text
stringlengths 2.85k
2.55M
| label
class label 11
classes |
|---|---|
1
Secure SWIPT for Directional Modulation Aided
AF Relaying Networks
arXiv:1803.05278v1 [cs.IT] 14 Mar 2018
Xiaobo Zhou, Jun Li, Feng Shu, Qingqing Wu, Yongpeng Wu, Wen Chen, and Hanzo Lajos
Abstract—Secure wireless information and power transfer
based on directional modulation is conceived for amplify-andforward (AF) relaying networks. Explicitly, we first formulate
a secrecy rate maximization (SRM) problem, which can be
decomposed into a twin-level optimization problem and solved
by a one-dimensional (1D) search and semidefinite relaxation
(SDR) technique. Then in order to reduce the search complexity,
we formulate an optimization problem based on maximizing the
signal-to-leakage-AN-noise-ratio (Max-SLANR) criterion, and
transform it into a SDR problem. Additionally, the relaxation
is proved to be tight according to the classic Karush-KuhnTucker (KKT) conditions. Finally, to reduce the computational
complexity, a successive convex approximation (SCA) scheme
is proposed to find a near-optimal solution. The complexity of
the SCA scheme is much lower than that of the SRM and the
Max-SLANR schemes. Simulation results demonstrate that the
performance of the SCA scheme is very close to that of the SRM
scheme in terms of its secrecy rate and bit error rate (BER), but
much better than that of the zero forcing (ZF) scheme.
Index Terms—Directional modulation, simultaneous wireless
information and power transfer, AF, artificial noise, secrecy rate.
I. I NTRODUCTION
The past decade has witnessed the rapid development of
Internet of Things (IoT). It is forecast that by 2025 about
30 billion IoT devices will be used worldwide [1], [2]. As
conventional battery is not convenient for such a huge number of devices, simultaneous wireless information and power
transfer (SWIPT) is recognized as a promising technology
to prolong the operation time of wireless devices [3]–[14].
The separated information receiver (IR) and energy receiver
(ER) are considered in [3]–[5]. The authors in [3], [15] considered a multi-user wireless information and power transfer
system, where the beamforming vector was designed by the
zero-forcing (ZF) algorithm and updated by maximizing the
energy harvested. In [4], the optimal beamforming scheme
was proposed for achieving the maximum secrecy rate, while
meeting the minimum energy requirement at the ER. In [5],
[16], the authors designed the robust information and energy
beamforming vectors for maximizing the energy harvested by
Xiaobo Zhou, Jun Li, and Feng Shu are with the School of Electronic and
Optical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing,
210094, China. e-mail: {zxb,jun.li}@njust.edu.cn, [email protected].
Xiaobo Zhou is also with the School of Fuyang normal university, Fuyang,
236037, China. Qingqing Wu is with the Department of Electrical and
Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117583, Singapore. e-mail: [email protected]. Yongpeng Wu and Wen Chen are
with Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Minhang 200240, China. e-mail:
{yongpeng.wu,wenchen}@sjtu.edu.cn. Hanzo Lajos is with the Department
of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, U. K. email:[email protected].
the ER under specific constraints on the signal-to-interference
plus noise ratio (SINR) at the IR. A power splitting (PS)
scheme was utilized to divide the received signal into two
parts in order to simultaneously harvest energy and to decode
information [6], [7], [9], [10]. The authors of [11], [12]
investigated both PS and time switching (TS) schemes and
compared the performance of these two schemes.
As an important technique of expanding the coverage of
networks, relaying can also beneficially enhance the communication security, whilst simultaneously enhancing energy
harvesting [17]–[21]. For the case of perfect channel state information (CSI) situations, secure SWIPT invoked in relaying
networks has been investigated [22]–[24]. Literature [22], proposed a constrained concave convex procedure (CCCP)-based
iterative algorithm for designing the beamforming vector of
multi-antenna aided non-regenerative relay networks. While in
[23], the analytical expressions of the ergodic secrecy capacity
were derived separately based on TS, PS and on ideal relaying
protocols. The beamforming vectors of SWIPT were designed
for amplify and forward (AF) two-way relay networks through
a sequential parametric convex approximation (SPCA)-based
iterative algorithm to find its locally optimal solution in [24].
By contrast, for the imperfect CSI scenarios, the channel
estimation uncertainty model was considered [25]–[29]. In
[25]–[27], the robust information beamformer and artificial
noise (AN) covariance matrix were designed with the objective
of maximizing the secrecy rate under the constraint of a certain
maximum transmit power. The secrecy rate maximization
(SRM) problem was a non-convex problem in [25]–[27], the
critical process is, how to transform it into a tractable convex
optimization problem by using the S-Procedure. In [28] and
[29], the authors formulate the power minimization problem
under a specific secrecy rate constraint and minimum energy
requirement at the energy harvester (EH), which was solved in
a similar manner. In general, for the imperfect CSI situations,
the channel estimation error is usually modeled obeying the
ellipsoid bound constraint, and then be transformed into a
convex constraint by using the S-procedure.
Recently, a promising physical layer security technique,
known as directional modulation (DM), has attracted a lot
of attention. In contrast to conventional information beamforming techniques, DM has the ability to directly transmit
the confidential messages in desired directions to guarantee
the security of information transmission, while distorting the
signals leaking out in other directions [30]–[34]. In [30], the
authors proposed a DM technique that employed a phased
array to generate the modulation. By controlling the phase
shift for each array element, the magnitude and phase of each
2
computational complexity, we propose an algorithm based on
successive convex approximation (SCA). Specifically, we first
formulate the SRM optimization problem and then transform
it into a second-order cone programming (SOCP) which is
finally solved by the SCA method. Furthermore, we analyse
and compare the complexity of the aforementioned three
schemes.
3) The formulated optimization problems include random
variables corresponding to the estimation error of the direction
angles, which makes the optimization problems very difficult
to tackle directly. To facilitate solving this problem, we derive
the analytical expression of the covariance matrix of each
eavesdroppers’ steering vector and substitute it into the optimization problems to replace the random variable. Moveover,
we add relay and energy harvesting node to the DM-based
secure systems, which further expand the application of DM
technology. Simulation results demonstrate that the bit error
rate (BER) performance of all our schemes in the desired
direction is significantly better than that in other directions,
while the BER is poor in the vicinity of the eavesdroppers’
directions, showing the advantages of our DM technology in
the field of physical layer security.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section II
introduces the system model. In Section III, three algorithms
are proposed to design the robust secure beamforming. Section
IV provides our simulation results. while, Section V concludes
the paper.
Notation: Boldface lowercase and uppercase letters represent vectors and matrices, respectively, A∗ , AT , AH , Tr(A),
rank(A), A ≻ 0 and A 0 denote conjugate, transpose,
conjugate transpose, trace, rank, positiveness and semidefiniteness of matrix A, respectively, E[·], j, and k · k denote the
statistical expectation, pure imaginary number, and Euclidean
norm, respectively, and ⊗ denotes the Kronecker product.
II. S YSTEM M ODEL
As shown in Fig. 1, we consider AF-aided secure SWIPT,
where the source transmitter sends confidential messages to
an IR with the aid of an AF relay in the presence of an ER
and M eavesdroppers (E1 , · · · , EM ). It is assumed that the
AF relay is equipped with an N -element antenna array, while
all other nodes have a single antenna.
IR
h(q
rd
)
h(q r p
)
ER
h(q s r )
h(qr )
e1
Source
Relay
h(q
E1
re
M
)
...
symbol can be adjusted in the desired direction. The authors in
[31] proposed a method of orthogonal vectors and introduced
the concept of AN into DM systems and synthesis. Since the
AN contaminates the undesired receiver, the security of the
DM systems is greatly improved. Subsequently, the orthogonal
vector method was applied to the synthesis of multi-beam DM
systems [32]. The proposed methods in [31] and [32] achieve
better performance at the perfect direction angle, but it is
very sensitive to the estimation error of the direction angle.
The authors in [33] modeled the error of angle estimation as
uniform distribution and proposed a robust synthesis method
for the DM system to reduce the effect of estimation error. In
[34], the authors also considered the estimation error of the
direction angle and proposed a robust beamforming scheme in
the DM broadcast scenario.
However, none of these contributions consider DM-based
relaying techniques. For example, if the desired user is beyond
the coverage of the transmitter or there is no direct link between the transmitter and the desired user, the above methods
are not applicable. Moreover, in [33], [34], the proposed robust
methods only designed the normalized confidential messages
beamforming and AN projection matrix without considering
the power allocation problem. In fact, the power allocation
of confidential messages and AN has a great impact on the
security of DM systems. To the best of our knowledge, there
exists no DM-based scheme considering secure SWIPT, which
thus motivates this work.
To tackle this open problem, we propose a secure SWIPT
scheme based on AF aided DM. Compared to [25]–[29],
instead of channel estimation error modeled obeying the
ellipsoid bound constraint, we model the estimation error of
direction angle as the truncated Gaussian distribution which is
more practical in our DM scenario [34]. The main contributions of this paper are summarized as follows.
1) We formulate the SRM problem subject to the total
power constraint at an AF relay and to the minimum energy
requirement at the ER. Since the secrecy rate expression is
the difference of two logarithmic functions, it is noncovex
and difficult to tackle directly. Additionally, the estimates
of the eavesdropper directions are usually biased. To solve
this problem and to find the robust information beamforming
matrix as well as the AN covariance matrix, we convert the
original problem into a twin-level optimization problem, which
can be solved by a one-dimensional (1D) search and the classic
semidefinite relaxation (SDR) technique. The 1D search range
is bounded into a feasible interval. Furthermore, the SDR
is proved tight by invoking the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT)
condition.
2) To reduce the the search complexity, we propose a
suboptimal solution for maximizing the signal-to-leakage-ANnoise-ratio (Max-SLANR) subject to the total power constraint
of the relay and to the minimum energy required at the ER.
Due to the existence of multiple eavesdroppers, we consider
the sum-power of the confidential messages leaked out to all
the eavesdroppers. This optimization problem is also shown
to be nonconvex, but it can be transformed into a semidefinite
programming (SDP) problem and then solved by the SDR
technique. Its tightness is also quantified. To further reduce the
EM
Fig. 1. System model of secure beamforming with SWIPT based on
directional modulation in AF relaying networks
3
Similar to the literature on DM [33], [34], this paper adopts
the free-space path loss model which is practical for some
scenarios such as communication in the air and rural areas. The
steering vector between node a and node b can be expressed
as [31]
iT
√
1 h j2πΨθ (1)
ab
e
, · · · , ej2πΨθab (N ) , (1)
h(θab ) = gab √
N
|
{z
}
The normalized steering vector
where gab is the path loss between node a and node b. The
function Ψθab (n) can be expressed as
(n − (N + 1)/2)l cos θab
, n = 1, . . . , N, (2)
λ
where θab denotes the angle of direction between node a and
node b, l denotes the distance between two adjacent antenna
elements, and λ is the wavelength.
We assume that there is no direct link from the source to
the IR, ER or to any of the eavesdroppers. Thus the relay
helps the source to transmit the confidential message x to IR.
The relay node is assumed to operate in an AF half-duplex
mode. Simultaneously, ER intends to harvest energy, while
the eavesdroppers try to intercept the confidential message.
The power of the signal x is normalized to, E[xxH ] = 1. In
the first time slot, the source transmits the signal x to the relay,
and the signal received at the relay is given by
p
yr = Ps h(θsr )x + nr ,
(3)
Ψθab (n) , −
where Ps is the transmission power of the source, h(θsr )
denotes the steering vector between the source and the relay,
nr ∼ CN (0, σr2 IN ) is a circularly symmetric complex Gaussian (CSCG) noise vector, and θsr is the angle of direction
between the source and the relay. In the second time slot, the
relay amplifies and forwards the received signal to IR. The
signal transmitted from the relay is given by
p
(4)
xr = Wyr + z = Ps Wh(θsr )x + Wnr + z,
respectively, where h(θrd ), h(θrp ), and h(θrem ) denote the
steering vectors from the relay to IR, ER, and the m-th
eavesdropper respectively. Furthermore, n0 , np , and ne represent the CSCG noise at IR, ER, and the m-th eavesdropper,
respectively, while n0 ∼ CN (0, σ02 ), np ∼ CN (0, σk2 ), and
ne ∼ CN (0, σe2 ). Without loss of generality, we assume that
σr2 , σ02 , σk2 , and σe2 are all equal to σ 2 .
Similar to the considerations in [26] and [28], namely that
the perfect CSI of the destination is available at the relay,
here we assume that the relay has the perfect knowledge of
direction angles to the IR. However, there is an estimation error
of the direction angles of eavesdroppers at the relay, and we
assume that the relay has the statistical information about these
estimation errors. Therefore, the m-th eavesdropper’s direction
angle to the relay can be modeled as
θrem = θ̂rem + ∆θrem , m ∈ M,
(9)
where θ̂rem is the estimate of the m-th eavesdropper’s direction angle at the relay, and ∆θrem denotes the estimation error,
while is assumed to follow a truncated Gaussian distribution
spread over the interval [−∆θmax , ∆θmax ] with zero mean
and variance σθ2 . The probability density function of ∆θrem
can be expressed as
f (∆θrem ) =
2
−∆θre
m
1
2σ2
√
θ
e
, −∆θmax ≤ ∆θrem ≤ ∆θmax , (10)
Ke 2πσθ
0,
otherwise,
where Ke is the normalization factor defined as
2
Z ∆θmax
−∆θre
m
1
2σ2
θ
√
e
d(∆θrem ).
Ke =
2πσθ
−∆θmax
(11)
III. ROBUST S ECURE SWIPT D ESIGN
(5)
In this section, three algorithms are proposed to design
the robust secure beamforming under the assumption that an
estimation error of the direction angles of eavesdroppers exists
at the relay. To design the robust beamforming matrix and AN
covariance matrix, we first define
i
h
Hrem , E h(θ̂rem + ∆θrem )hH (θ̂rem + ∆θrem ) , m ∈ M,
(12)
The signal received at the IR, ER, and the m-th eavesdropper
can be expressed as
and Hrem ∈ CN ×N . Let Hrem (p, q) denote the p-th row and
q-th column entry of Hrem , and Hrem (p, q) can be written as
yd =hH (θrd )xr + n0
p
= Ps hH (θrd )Wh(θsr )x + hH (θrd )Wnr
Hrem (p, q) = Γ1m (p, q) − jΓ2m (p, q),
+ hH (θrd )z + n0 ,
(6)
p
Ps hH (θrp )Wh(θsr )x + hH (θrp )Wnr
(7)
p
Ps hH (θrem )Wh(θsr )x + hH (θrem )Wnr
(8)
where W ∈ CN ×N is the beamforming matrix, and z ∈ CN ×1
is the AN vector assumed to obey a (CSCG) distribution
CN (0, Ω) with Ω 0. In general, the relay has a total transmit
power constraint Pt , therefore we have
Ps kWh(θsr )k2 + σr2 Tr(WH W) + Tr(Ω) ≤ Pt .
yp =
+ hH (θrp )z + np ,
and
yem =
+ hH (θrem )z + ne , m ∈ M = [1, 2, ..., M ],
(13)
where Γ1m and Γ2m can be found in (64) and (67), respectively. The specific derivation procedure is detailed in
Appendix A.
According to (7), the energy harvested at the ER is given
by [35]
E =ρ Ps |hH (θrp )Wh(θsr )|2 + σ 2 kWH h(θrp )k2
+ hH (θrp )Ωh(θrp ) ,
(14)
where 0 < ρ ≤ 1 denotes the energy transfer efficiency of the
ER.
4
From (6), the SINR at the IR can be expressed as
SINRd =
and
Ps |hH (θrd )Wh(θsr )|2
. (15)
2
H
σ kW h(θrd )k2 + hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2
According to (8), the m-th eavesdropper’s SINR is given
by
SINRem =
Ps |hH (θrem )Wh(θsr )|2
.
2
2
H
rem )k + h (θrem )Ωh(θrem ) + σ
(16)
σ 2 kWH h(θ
Thus, the achievable secrecy rate at the IR can be expressed
as [36]
Rs = min
m∈M
1
{log2 (1 + SINRd ) − E [log2 (1 + SINRem )]},
2
(17)
where the scaling factor 12 is due to the fact that two time slots
are required to transmit one message. By invoking Jensen’s
inequality, the worst-case secrecy rate is given by
Rs ≥ R̄s =
1
min {log2 (1 + SINRd ) − log2 (1 + E [SINRem ])}, (18)
m∈M 2
where the expectation of the SINRem can be approximated as
[37] [38]
(19)
E [SINRem ] ≈
2
H
E[Ps |h (θrem )Wh(θsr )| ]
.
E[σ 2 kWH h(θrem )k2 ] + E[hH (θrem )Ωh(θrem )] + σ 2
A. Secrecy Rate Maximization based on One-Dimensional
search Scheme (SRM-1D)
In this subsection, the robust information beamforming
matrix W and AN covariance matrix Ω are designed by our
SRM-1D scheme. Specifically, according to (5), (14), and
(17), we maximize the worst-case secrecy rate subject to the
total transmit power and the harvested energy constraints. Then
the optimization problem can be formulated as
(P1) : max R̄s
(20a)
W,Ω
2
2
H
s.t. Ps kWh(θsr )k + σ Tr(W W) + Tr(Ω) ≤ Pt , (20b)
ρ Ps |hH (θrp )Wh(θsr )|2 + σ 2 kWH h(θrp )k2
+ hH (θrp )Ωh(θrp ) ≥ Pmin , Ω 0,
(20c)
where (20b) denotes total power constraint at the relay, and
the first term in (20c) denotes the minimum power required by
the ER. We employ a 1D search and a SDR-based algorithm to
solve problem (P1). Observe that R̄s is the difference of two
logarithmic functions, which is non-convex and untractable.
Similar to [35], we decompose (20) into two sub-problems,
yielding:
1 + φ(β)
1
max log2
β
2
1+β
s.t. 0 ≤ β ≤ βmax ,
(21)
Ps |hH (θrd )Wh(θsr )|2
W,Ω σ 2 kWH h(θrd )k2 + hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2
E[Ps |hH (θrem )Wh(θsr )|2 ]
s.t.
E[σ 2 kWH h(θrem )k2 ] + E[hH (θrem )Ωh(θrem )] + σ 2
≤ β, m ∈ M,
(20b), (20c),
(22)
φ(β) = max
where β is a slack variable. The main steps to solve the
problem (P1) are as follows. First, for each β inside the
interval [0, βmax ], we can obtain a corresponding φ(β) by
solving the problem (22). Second, upon substituting β and
φ(β) into the objective function of (21), we obtain the secrecy
rate corresponding to the given β. Thirdly, we perform a 1D
search for β, compare all the secrecy rates obtained and then
finally we find the optimal value for (21).
As for the above procedure of solving the problem (P1), the
most important and complex part is to solve the problem (22)
to obtain φ(β). This are illustrated as follows. Upon defining
2
w , vec(W) ∈ CN ×1 , we can rewrite (22) as
Ps wH A1 w
, (23a)
w,Ω σ 2 wH A2 w + hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2
Ps wH B1m w
s.t. 2 H
≤ β, m ∈ M, (23b)
σ w B2m w + Tr(Hrem Ω) + σ 2
Ps wH C1 w + σ 2 wH w + Tr(Ω) ≤ Pt ,
(23c)
φ(β) = max
Ps wH D1 w + σ 2 wH D2 w + hH (θrp )Ωh(θrp )
Pmin
, Ω 0,
≥
ρ
(23d)
where
A1 = h∗ (θsr )hT (θsr ) ⊗ h(θrd )hH (θrd ) ,
A2 =IN ⊗ h(θrd )hH (θrd ) ,
∗
B1m = h (θsr )hT (θsr ) ⊗ (Hrem ) , m ∈ M,
B2m =IN ⊗ (Hrem ) , m ∈ M,
C1 = h∗ (θsr )hT (θsr ) ⊗ IN ,
D1 = h∗ (θsr )hT (θsr ) ⊗ h(θrp )hH (θrp ) ,
D2 =IN ⊗ h(θrp )hH (θrp ) .
(24a)
(24b)
(24c)
(24d)
(24e)
(24f)
(24g)
With the above vectorization, we show problem (23) can
be transformed into a standard SDP problem. Upon defining
2
2
W̃ , wwH ∈ CN ×N , (23) can be rewritten as
Ps Tr(A1 W̃)
(25a)
σ 2 Tr(A2 W̃) + hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2
s.t. Ps Tr(B1m W̃) − βσ 2 Tr(B2m W̃) − βTr(Hrem Ω)
φ(β) = max
W̃,Ω
− βσ 2 ≤ 0, m ∈ M,
(25b)
2
Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ Tr(W̃) + Tr(Ω) ≤ Pt ,
2
H
(25c)
Ps Tr(D1 W̃) + σ Tr(D2 W̃) + h (θrp )Ωh(θrp )
Pmin
,
(25d)
≥
ρ
rank(W̃) = 1, W̃ 0, Ω 0.
(25e)
5
Note that the rank constraint in (25e) is non-convex. By
dropping the rank-one constraint in (25e), the SDR of problem
(25) can be expressed as
Ps Tr(A1 W̃)
+ hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2
s.t. (25b), (25c), (25d), W̃ 0, Ω 0.
(26)
According to the fact that the secrecy rate is always higher
than or equal to zero, we get
Ps wH A1 w
σ 2 wH A2 w + hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2
Ps wH A1 w
.
≤ 2 H
σ w A2 w + σ 2
β≤
φ(β) = max
W̃,Ω σ 2 Tr(A2 W̃)
It can be observed that (26) constitutes a quasi-convex problem, which can be transformed into a convex optimization
problem by using the Charnes-Cooper transformation [39].
Upon introducing slack variable τ , problem (26) can be
equivalently rewritten as
φ(β) = max Ps Tr(A1 Q)
From the transmit power constraint in (23), we have
σ2 H
Pt w w ≤ 1, hence
β≤
Ps wH A1 w
Ps wH A1 w
=
.
4
4
σ 2 wH A2 w + σPt wH w
wH (σ 2 A2 + σPt IN 2 )w
(30)
− βσ 2 τ ≤ 0, m ∈ M,
Observe that A1 can be recast as
A1 = [h∗ (θsr ) ⊗ h(θrd )] hT (θsr ) ⊗ hH (θrd ) = a1 aH
1 ,
(31)
σ 2 Tr(A2 Q) + hH (θrd )Υh(θrd ) + σ 2 τ = 1,
where a1 ∈ CN ×1 . Therefore, we have rank(A1 ) = 1.
According to (30) and (31), the upper bound of β is given by
Q,Υ,τ
s.t. Ps Tr(B1m Q) − βσ 2 Tr(B2m Q) − βTr(H̄rem Υ)
Ps Tr(C1 Q) + σ 2 Tr(Q) + Tr(Υ) ≤ Pt τ,
Ps Tr(D1 Q) + σ 2 Tr(D2 Q) + hH (θrp )Υh(θrp )
Pmin τ
, Q 0, Υ 0, τ > 0,
(27)
≥
ρ
where Q = W̃τ and Υ = Ωτ . Since problem (27) is a
standard SDP problem [40], its optimal solution can be found
by using SDP solvers, such as CVX. If the optimal solution
of problem (27) is (Q⋆ , Υ⋆ , τ ), then (Q⋆ /τ, Υ⋆ /τ ) will be
the optimal solution of problem (26).
Since we have dropped the rank-one constraint in the
problem (25) and reformulated it as a SDR problem (26),
the optimal solution of (26) may not be rank-one and thus
the optimal objective value of (26) generally serves an upper
bound of (25). Next, we show that the above SDR is in fact
tight. We consider the power minimization problem as follows
min Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃)
W̃,Ω
s.t.
(29)
Ps Tr(A1 W̃)
≥ φ(β),
+ hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2
(25b), (25c), (25d), W̃ 0, Ω 0,
(28)
σ 2 Tr(A2 W̃)
where φ(β) is the optimal value of problem (26). Observe
that the optimal solution of problem (28) is also an optimal
solution of (26). The proof is similar to that in [41] and thus
omitted here for brevity. In order to obtain the optimal solution
of (25), we should first obtain the optimal solution (W̃⋆ , Ω⋆ )
and the optimal value φ(β) of problem (26) by solving (27).
If rank(W̃⋆ ) = 1, then we get the optimal solution of (25).
Otherwise, the rank-one solution can be found by solving (28).
Lemma 1: The optimal solution W̃⋆ in (28) satisfies
rank(W̃⋆ ) = 1.
Proof : See Appendix B.
Since W̃⋆ is a rank-one matrix, we can write W̃⋆ =
⋆ ⋆H
w w
by using eigenvalue decomposition. Thus, the SDR
is tight and the optimal solution of (23) is w⋆ and Ω⋆ . Up to
now, we have solved the problem (22).
Let us now return to the procedure used for the problem
(21). The maximum of β should be found by a 1D search.
2
2
β ≤ Ps aH
1 (σ A2 +
σ4
IN 2 )−1 a1 = βmax .
Pt
(32)
The proposed SRM-1D scheme is summarized in Algorithm
1.
Algorithm 1 Maximize secrecy rate based on 1D search
Initialize ε, n, β, and compute βmax .
repeat
1) Set n = n + 1, β = β + ε.
2) Solve problem (27) and obtain the optimal solution
(Q̃⋆ (n), Υ⋆ (n), τ ⋆ (n)) and optimal value φ(β)(n).
3) Compute secrecy rate Rs (n) according to the objective
function of (21).
until β > βmax .
• n = arg max Rs(n), and W̃⋆ = Q⋆ (n)/τ ⋆ (n),
n
Ω⋆ = Υ̃⋆ (n)/τ ⋆ (n). If rank(W̃⋆ )=1, then go to next step;
otherwise, solve (28).
• By using eigenvalue decomposition, we can obtain w⋆ ,
1
and reconstruct W⋆ ; z = Ω⋆ 2 v and v ∼ CN (0, IN ).
return W⋆ and z⋆ .
B. Maximization of Signal-to-Leakage-AN-Noise-Ratio (MaxSLANR) Scheme
In the previous subsection, we employed a 1D search and
a SDR-based algorithm to solve problem (P1). Although we
have already derived βmax , to limit the range of the 1D search,
the complexity of the 1D search still remains high since for
each β, a SDP with O(N 13 ) needs to be solved. In order
to avoid employing the 1D search, we propose an alternative
algorithm for the suboptimal solution of (P1). Specifically, we
propose an algorithm to maximize the SLANR rather than
secrecy rate, subject to the total power and to the harvested
energy constraints. Based on the concept of leakage [42], from
(6) and (8), the optimization problem (P1) can be reformulated
as (33) at the top of the next page. The numerator of the
6
Ps |hH (θrd )Wh(θsr )|2
max PM
E[Ps |hH (θrem )Wh(θsr )|2 ] + hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2 kWH h(θrd )k2 + σ 2
s.t. Ps kWh(θsr )k2 + σ 2 Tr(WH W) + Tr(Ω) ≤ Pt ,
Pmin
Ps |hH (θrp )Wh(θsr )|2 + σ 2 kWH h(θrp )k2 + hH (θrp )Ωh(θrp ) ≥
, Ω 0.
ρ
W,Ω
m=1
max PM
W̃,Ω
m=1
Ps Tr(A1 W̃)
Ps Tr(B1m W̃) + hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + σ 2 Tr(A2 W̃) + σ 2
s.t. Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃) + Tr(Ω) ≤ Pt ,
Ps Tr(D1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(D2 W̃) + hH (θrp )Ωh(θrp ) ≥
objective function in (33) represents the received confidential
message power at the IR, and the first term in the denominator
denotes the sum of confidential message power leaked to all
eavesdroppers.
Following similar steps as in Section III-A and dropping
the rank-one constraint, the related SDR problem can be
formulated as show in (34) at the top of the page, where
2
2
2
W̃ = wwH ∈ CN ×N and w = vec(W) ∈ CN ×1 . Note
that all constraints in (34) are convex. However, the objective
function is a linear fractional function, which is quasi-convex.
Similar to (26), we transform (34) into a convex optimization
problem by using the Charnes-Cooper transformation [39].
Problem (34) can then be equivalently rewritten as
max Ps Tr(A1 Q)
Q,Υ,τ
M
X
s.t.
(33)
Ps Tr(B1m Q) + hH (θrd )Υh(θrd )+
m=1
σ 2 Tr(A2 Q) + σ 2 τ = 1,
Ps Tr(C1 Q) + σ 2 Tr(Q) + Tr(Υ) ≤ Pt τ,
Ps Tr(D1 Q) + σ 2 Tr(D2 Q) + hH (θrp )Υh(θrp )
Pmin τ
, Q 0, Υ 0, τ > 0,
(35)
≥
ρ
where τ is a slack variable, Q = W̃τ and Υ = Ωτ . To prove
that the relaxation is tight, we consider the associated power
minimization problem, which is similar to that in Section
III-A, yielding
min Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃)
Pmin
, W̃ 0, Ω 0.
ρ
(34)
Lemma 2: The optimal solution W̃⋆ in (36) satisfies
rank(W̃⋆ ) = 1.
Proof : See Appendix C.
C. Low-complexity SCA Scheme
In the III-A and III-B, we have proposed the SRM-1D and
the Max-SLANR schemes to obtain the information beamforming matrix and the AN covariance matrix. Both of the two
schemes have high computational complexity because their optimization variables are matrices. To facilitate implementation
in practice, we propose a low complexity scheme based on
SCA in this subsection. Specifically, we first formulate the
optimization problem, then convert it into the SOCP problem,
and use the SCA method to solve the problem iteratively.
Different from designing the AN covariance matrix Ω in the
previous two subsections, here we are devoted to designing
the AN beamforming vector v, where Ω = vvH .
The optimization problem (20) can be rewritten as
1 + SINRd
1 + E[SINRem ]
s.t. wH (Ps C1 + σ 2 IN 2 )w + vH v ≤ Pt ,
max min
w,v
m
(37a)
(37b)
P
min
,
wH (Ps D1 + σ 2 D2 )w + vH h(θrp )hH (θrp )v ≥
ρ
(37c)
W̃,Ω
s.t. − Ps Tr(A1 W̃) + φ
M
X
Ps Tr(B1m W̃)+
m=1
φhH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + φσ 2 Tr(A2 W̃) + φσ 2 ≤ 0,
Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃) + Tr(Ω) ≤ Pt ,
Ps Tr(D1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(D2 W̃) + hH (θrp )Ωh(θrp )
Pmin
≥
, Ω 0, W̃ 0,
(36)
ρ
where φ is the optimal value of (35). Problem (36) is a
standard SDP problem.
where SINRd and E[SINRem ] are defined in (23a) and (23b),
respectively. By introducing slack variables r1 and r2 , problem
(37) is equivalently rewritten as
max
w,v,r1 ,r2
r1 r2
s.t. 1 + SINRd ≥ r1 ,
1
1 + E[SINRem ] ≤ , m ∈ M,
r2
(37b), (37c).
(38a)
(38b)
(38c)
(38d)
7
(38b) and (38c) can be rearranged as
σ 2 wH A2 w + vH h(θrd )hH (θrd )v + σ 2 ≤
H
Ps w A1 w
,
r1 − 1
(39a)
wH (Ps B1m + σ 2 B2m )w + vH Hrem v + σ 2
1
≤ (σ 2 wH B2m w + vH Hrem v + σ 2 ), m ∈ M, (39b)
r2
respectively. Since the quadratic-over-linear function is convex
[40], the right-hand-side (RHS) of (39a) and (39b) are convex
functions (r1 > 1, r2 > 0). In the following, we first transform
the (39a) and (39b) into convex constraints by using the firstorder Talyor expansions [43], and then convert them into the
second-order cone (SOC) constraints. To this end, we define
H
x Ax
,
(40)
r−a
where A 0 and r > a. We perform a first-order Taylor
expansion on (40) at point (x̃, r̃) [22], yielding:
fA,a (x, r) =
fA,a (x, r) ≥FA,a (x, r, x̃, r̃)
2Re{x̃H Ax}
x̃H Ax̃
=
(r − a),
−
r̃ − a
(r̃ − a)2
(41)
where the inequality holds due to the convexity of fA,a (x, r)
with respect to x and r. Therefore, (39a) and (39b) can be
rewritten as
σ 2 wH A2 w + vH h(θrd )hH (θrd )v + σ 2
≤ Ps FA1 ,1 (w, r1 , w̃, r̃1 ),
H
2
H
(42a)
w (Ps B1m + σ B2m )w + v Hrem v + σ ≤ Fm ,
which can be transformed into the SOC constraints, i.e.,
1
2σA22 w; 2hH (θrd )v; 2σ; Ps FA1 ,1 (w, r1 , w̃, r̃1 ) − 1
≤ Fm + 1, m ∈ M,
(43a)
(43b)
where Fm is defined as
Fm =σ 2 FB2m ,0 (w, r2 , w̃, r̃2 ) + FHrem ,0 (v, r2 , ṽ, r̃2 )
r2
2
2
(44)
− 2 .
+σ
r̃2
r̃2
It is easy to see that the objective function of the problem
(38) is non-concave and the constraint (37c) is non-convex.
To handle the non-concave objective function, we introduce
slack variables t and ψ and then rewrite the problem (38) as
max
w,v,r1 ,r2 ,t,ψ
t
s.t. r1 r2 ≥ ψ 2 , ψ 2 ≥ t, .
(43a), (43b), (37b), (37c).
(45a)
(45b)
(45c)
Note that the first term of the (45b) can be rearranged as the
SOC constraint, i.e.,
k[r1 − r2 ; 2ψ]k ≤ r1 + r2 .
(46)
(47)
In the following, we will focus on dealing with the nonconvex constraint (37c). To convert (37c) into the convex
constraint, we define
uA (x) = xH Ax,
(48)
where A 0. Since uA (x) is a convex function, we have the
following inequality
uA (x) ≥ UA (x, x̃) = 2Re(x̃H Ax) − x̃H Ax̃,
(49)
where the inequality (49) holds based on the first-order Taylor
expansion at the point x̃. According to (49), (37c) can be
rewritten as
Pmin
,
(50)
UG (w, w̃) + UHrp (v, ṽ) ≥
ρ
where G = Ps D1 + σ 2 D2 and Hrp = h(θrp )hH (θrp ). In
addition, (37b) can be equivalently rewritten as
p
1
(Ps C1 + σ 2 IN 2 ) 2 w; v ≤ Pt .
(51)
According to the above transformation of the objective function and the constraints of problem (37), we can convert (37)
into the following SOCP problem
w,v,r1 ,r2 ,t,ψ
(42b)
≤ Ps FA1 ,1 (w, r1 , w̃, r̃1 ) + 1,
1
1
2
2(Ps B1m + σ 2 B2m ) 2 w; 2Hre
m v; 2σ; Fm − 1
2ψ̃ψ − ψ̃ 2 ≥ t.
max
2
m ∈ M,
For the second term of the (45b), we employ the first-order
Taylor expansion at the point ψ̃ and transform it into the linear
constraint, i.e.,
t
s.t. (46), (47), (50), (51), (43a), (43b).
(52)
It can be seen that the optimization problem (52) consists
of a linear objective function and several SOC constraints.
Therefore, problem (52) is a convex optimization problem.
For a given feasible solution (w̃, ṽ, r̃1 , r̃2 , ψ̃), we can solve the
problem (52) by means of convex optimization tools such as
CVX [40]. Based on the idea of SCA, the original optimization
problem (37) can be solved iteratively by solving a series
of convex subproblems (52). The current optimal solution
of the convex subproblem (52) is gradually approaching the
optimal solution of the original problem with the increase of
the number of iterations, until the algorithm converges [44].
Algorithm 2 lists the detailed process of the SCA algorithm.
Algorithm 2 SCA Algorithm for Solving Problem (37)
Initialize: Given a feasible solution (w̃0 , ṽ0 , r̃10 , r̃20 , ψ̃ 0 );
n=0.
repeat
1. Solve the problem (52) with (w̃n , ṽn , r̃1n , r̃2n , ψ̃ n ) and
obtain the current optimal solution (w̃∗ , ṽ∗ , r̃1∗ , r̃2∗ , ψ̃ ∗ );
n=n+1.
2. Update (w̃n , ṽn , r̃1n , r̃2n , ψ̃ n )=(w̃∗ , ṽ∗ , r̃1∗ , r̃2∗ , ψ̃ ∗ ).
3. Compute secrecy rate R̄sn .
until |R̄sn − R̄sn−1 | < δ is met, where δ denotes the
convergence tolerance.
8
TABLE I
C OMPLEXITY ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED ALGORITHMS
Algorithms
SRM-1D-Robust
Max-SLANR-Robust
SCA-Robust
Complexity order suppressing ln( 1ǫ )
√
O nT N 2 + N + M + 5 N 6 + N 3 + n(N 4 + N 2 + M + 5) + M + 5 + n2 , where n = O(N 4 + N 2 + 1).
√
O n N 2 + N + 5 N 6 + N 3 + n(N 4 + N 2 + 5) + 5 + n2 , where n = O(N 4 + N 2 + 1).
√
O nL 2M + 8 (N 2 + N )2 + (M + 1)(N 2 + N + 1)2 + 6 + 2n + n2 , where n = O(N 2 + N + 4).
D. Complexity Analysis
In this section, we analyze and compare the complexity of
the proposed three schemes in the previous three subsections.
For the SRM-1D scheme, we convert the SRM problem to the
SDP form and solve it with an 1D search. The complexity of
each search is calculated according to problem (27). Problem
(27) consists of M + 5 linear constraints with dimension 1,
one LMI constraint of size N 2 , and one LMI constraint of
size N . The number of decision variables n is on the order
of N 4 + N 2 + 1. Therefore, the total complexity based on the
SRM-1D scheme can be expressed as [45]
p
O nT N 2 + N + M + 5 N 6 + N 3 + n(N 4 + N 2 +
(53)
M + 5) + M + 5 + n2 ln (1/ǫ) ,
where T denotes the number of iterations in the 1D search
and ǫ denotes the computation accuracy.
For the Max-SLANR scheme, we compute the complexity
of the optimization problem (35), which consists of one LMI
constraint with size of N 2 , one LMI constraint with size of N
and five linear constraints. The number of decision variables n
is on the order of N 4 +N 2 +1. Therefore, the total complexity
based on the Max-SLANR scheme can be expressed as
p
O n N 2 + N + 5 N 6 + N 3 + n(N 4 + N 2 + 5)
(54)
+ 5 + n2 ln (1/ǫ) ,
For the proposed SCA scheme, we first formulate the SRM
problem, then convert it into the SOCP form, and use the
SCA algorithm to solve it iteratively. The complexity of each
iteration is calculated according to problem (52). Problem
(52) includes two linear constraints, one SOC constraint of
dimension 2, one SOC constraint of dimension N 2 + N , M+1
SOC constraints of dimension N 2 + N + 1. The number of
decision variables n is on the order of N 2 + N + 4. Therefore,
the total complexity based on the SCA scheme is given by
√
O nL 2M + 8 (N 2 + N )2 + (M + 1)(N 2 + N + 1)2
(55)
+ 6 + 2n + n2 ln (1/ǫ) ,
where L is the number of iterations. The complexity of the
proposed algorithms are also listed in Table I at the top the
page.
Discussions: Upon comparing (53), (54) and (55), it can
be observed that the complexity of the SCA algorithm is
much lower than that of the SRM-1D and the Max-SLANR
schemes. The complexity of Max-SLANR scheme is slightly
less than that of the SRM-1D scheme, but the SLANR scheme
does not require 1D search. Moreover, the complexity of the
SRM-1D scheme grows linearly upon increasing the precision
of the 1D search, with the number of iterations T , and
it grows with the number M of eavesdroppers, while the
complexity of the Max-SLANR scheme is not related to either
of them. This implies that when the number of eavesdroppers
increases, the complexity of the Max-SLANR scheme remains
constant, while the complexity of the SRM-1D and SCA
schemes increases. For example, for a system with N = 6,
M = 2, T = 12 and L = 6, the complexity of the SRM1D, the Max-SLANR, and SCA schemes, are O(3.98 × 1011),
O(3.25 × 1010 ), and O(8.87 × 106 ), respectively. Therefore,
the complexity of the SCA scheme is much lower than that of
the other two schemes.
IV. S IMULATION R ESULTS
TABLE II
S IMULATION PARAMETER
Parameters
The transmit power at the relay (Pt )
The transmit power at the source (Ps )
the noise variance (σ2 )
The number of transmit antennas at the relay (N )
The number of eavesdroppers (M )
the minimum energy required by the ER (Pmin )
The maximum angle estimation error (△θmax )
The normalization factor (Ke )
The energy transfer efficiency (ρ)
The direction angle of the source (θsr )
The direction angle of the IR (θrd )
The direction angle of the eavesdroppers (θre1 , θre2 )
The convergence tolerance (δ)
Values
30dBm
30dBm
−10dBm
6
2
10dBm
6◦
0.9
0.8
− 7π
18
π
2
π 11π
,
3 18
10−4
In this section, we evaluate the performance of our SRM1D, Max-SLANR, and SCA schemes by Monte Carlo simulations. Furthermore, we develop a method based on ZF [25]
to show the superiority of our schemes. Additionally, since
in our proposed scheme, we take into account the estimation
error of the direction angles of the eavesdroppers at the relay,
we also consider the scenario relying on perfect estimation of
the direction angle of eavesdroppers from the relay to arrive
at a performance upper-bound of our schemes.
In the following, we denote by ‘SRM-1D-Perfect’ and
‘SRM-1D-Robust’ the SRM-1D method with perfect and
imperfect knowledge of the direction angles from the relay to the eavesdroppers, respectively, and represent by
‘SCA-Robust’ and ‘Max-SLANR-Robust’ our SCA and MaxSLANR schemes, respectively, when takeing into consideration the estimation error of direction angles at the relay. The
9
simulation parameters are listed in Table II, unless otherwise
stated. The free-space path loss model used is defined as
−2
dmn
gmn =
,
(56)
d0
where gmn and dmn denote the path loss and distance between
node m and node n, while d0 is the reference distance, which
is set to 10m. The distances from relay to other nodes (source,
IR, ER and eavesdroppers) are assumed to be the same, which
1
. The direction angle of
are set to 80 meters, i.e., gmn = 64
the source, IR, ER and eavesdroppers are θsr = − 7π
18 , θrd =
π 11π
π
π
}
=
{
,
θ
,
θ
=
and
{θ
,
},
respectively.
The
rp
re1 re2
2
4
3 18
location of the source, relay, IR, ER and eavesdroppers in the
Cartesian coordinate system is shown in Fig. 2.
y
E2
scheme has the best secrecy rate, because it has perfectly
obtain the eavesdroppers’ directional angle information. Third,
the proposed SRM-1D-Robust slightly outperforms the proposed Max-SLANR-Robust arrangement. For example, when
Pt = 30dBm, the secrecy rate of the Max-SLANR-Robust
scheme is 0.05bits/s/Hz lower than that of the SRM-1DRobust scheme. This is because the SRM-1D-Robust scheme
is the optimal solution, while the Max-SLANR-Robust scheme
is a suboptimal solution. Fourth, the secrecy rate of SCARobust scheme is very close to that of the SRM-1D-Robust
scheme. However, the complexity of the SCA-Robust scheme
is much lower than that of the SRM-1D-Robust scheme.
Finally, compared to the ZF scheme, our schemes provide
significant performance improvement.
3.2
IR
E1
3
Secrecy rate(bits/s/Hz)
ER
x
R
80m
2.8
2.76
2.74
2.72
2.6
2.4
8
2.2
2
S
1.8
6
7
8
9
10
Fig. 4. Secrecy rate versus the minimum energy required by the ER for
N = 6, M = 2, Ps = 30dBm, Pt = 30dBm, ∆θmax = 6◦ .
3.2
Secrecy rate(bits/s/Hz)
5
Pmin(dBm)
Fig. 2. The location of source, relay, IR, ER and eavesdroppers.
3
2.62
2.8
2.6
2.6
28
2.4
2.2
2
SRM-Perfect
SRM-Robust
SCA-Robust
Max-SLANR-Robust
ZF
1.8
1.6
1.4
25
8.1
SRM-1D-Perfect
SRM-1D-Robust
SCA-Robust
Max-SLANR-Robust
ZF
26
27
28
29
30
Pt(dBm)
Fig. 3. Secrecy rate versus the transmit power at relay for N = 6, M = 2,
Ps = 30dBm, Pmin = 5dBm, ∆θmax = 6◦ .
In Fig. 3, we show the secrecy rate versus the total power
Pt at the relay. First, it can be observed that the secrecy rate
grows upon increasing the transmit power Pt at the relay for all
cases. Second, compared to other schemes, SRM-1D-Perfect
Fig. 4 shows the secrecy rate versus the minimum energy
required by the ER for N = 6, Ps = 30dBm, Pt = 30dBm,
∆θ = 6◦ . Naturally, the secrecy rate decreases with the
increase of the minimum energy required by the ER for
all cases. The reason behind this is that the more power is
used for energy harvesting, the less power remains for secure
communication, when the transmit power at the relay is fixed.
Furthermore, when Pmin < 9dBm, it is observed that the
secrecy rate decreases slowly. But when Pmin > 9dBm, the
secrecy rate decreases rapidly. This is because the signal is
transmitted over 80m away from the relay, hence the power
of the signal is only 12dBm due to the path loss. Since the
energy transfer efficiency is ρ = 0.8 and Pmin > 9dBm, the
power of the transmit signal is mainly used for satisfying the
energy harvesting constraint, which results in a rapid reduction
of the secrecy rate for all the schemes.
In Fig. 5, by fixing Pt = 30dBm and Pmin = 10dBm, we
investigate the effect of the maximum angular estimation error
∆θmax of the eavesdroppers on the secrecy rate. The SRM1D-Perfect curve remains constant for all ∆θmax values and
outperforms the other schemes due to the perfect knowledge of
the directional angle. With the increase of ∆θmax , the secrecy
10
2.5
2.5
2.3
2.335
2.2
2.33
2.1
4
2
4.02
SRM-1D-Perfect
SRM-1D-Robust
SCA-Robust
Max-SLANR-Robust
ZF
1.9
1.8
Secrecy rate(bits/s/Hz)
Secrecy rate(bits/s/Hz)
2.4
2
3
2
2.27
2.26
2.25
2.24
2.23
3.96
1.5
1
SRM-1D-Perfect
SRM-1D-Robust
SCA-Robust
Max-SLANR-Robust
ZF
0.5
4
5
0
6
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
∆θ max(degree)
The number of eavesdroppers (M)
Fig. 5. Secrecy rate versus the maximum estimate error angle for N = 6,
M = 2, Ps = 30dBm, Pt = 30dBm, Pmin = 10dBm.
Fig. 7. Secrecy rate versus the number of eavesdroppers for N = 6,
{θre1 , θre2 , θre3 , θre4 , θre5 , θre6 } = { π3 , 11π
, 3π
, π , 2π , 4π
}, Ps =
18
4 6 3
9
30dBm, Pt = 30dBm, Pmin = 10dBm, ∆θmax = 6◦ .
rates achieved by robust schemes degrades slowly, because the
proposed algorithms have considered the statistical property of
the estimation error. As such, they are robust against the effects
of estimation errors.
3
IR. The secrecy rate decreases because, as the relay continues
approaching the IR, it is getting farther away from the source
node, which decreases the SNR of the IR. We can observe that
the optimal point is yr = 30m. Moreover, when yr = 60m, it
is observed that the secrecy rates of all schemes converge to
the same points, because when the relay has a low SNR, all
these schemes have a similar secrecy rate performance.
2.914
2.912
2.91
2.908
2.906
2.904
2.902
2.6
2.4
100
5
SRM-1D-Perfect
SRM-1D-Robust
SCA-Robust
Max-SLANR-Robust
ZF
2
1.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
E1
10-1
2.2
E2
×10-3
BER
Secrecy rate(bits/s/Hz)
2.8
4
3
10-2
2
6
yr(m)
10-3
Fig. 6. Secrecy rate versus the location of relay for N = 6, M = 2,
Ps = 30dBm, Pt = 30dBm, Pmin = 10dBm, ∆θmax = 6◦ .
Fig. 6 shows the secrecy rate versus the location of the
relay. We denote the coordinates of the relay by (xr , yr ). In
this simulation, we fix xr to zero and assume that the relay
moves vertically along the y-axis, starting from the origin
towards the IR, while the locations of all the other nodes
are fixed. As the relay moves, it becomes closer to the IR
and farther from the source. We can see from Fig. 6 that
for all the schemes, the secrecy rate increases first and then
decreases. The secrecy rate increases because the received
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) increases as the relay moves to the
SRM-1D-Perfect
SRM-1D-Robust
SCA-Robust
Max-SLANR-Robust
ZF
1
90
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Direction Angle(degree)
Fig. 8. The performance of BER versus direction angle for N = 6, M = 2,
Ps = 30dBm, Pt = 25dBm, Pmin = 5dBm, ∆θmax = 6◦ .
Fig. 7 shows the secrecy rate versus the number of eavesdroppers. As can be seen from the Fig. 7, when M = 2 and
M = 6, the secrecy rate of the proposed algorithm decreases
rapidly. This is because the second and sixth eavesdroppers
are located near the DR. Moreover, when M = 6, the secrecy
rate of the ZF scheme is 0. This is because, the degrees of
11
freedom of the relay is 6 (N = 6), whereas the degrees of
freedom at eavesdroppers are 6 when M = 6. Therefore, there
is no degrees of freedom left for the DR.
Fig. 8 studies the bit error rate (BER) versus the direction
angle. We employ quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK)
modulation. As seen from Fig. 8, the BER performance in
the desired direction of 90◦ is significantly better than in other
directions for all cases. Observe from Fig. 8, that in the vicinity
of the two eavesdroppers’ directions, the BER performance is
poor, since the signals in these two directions are contaminated
by the AN. Thus the eavesdroppers cannot successfully receive
the information destined to the IR.
Substituting (58) into (57) yields
Z ∆θmax
Hrem (p, q) = Ĥrem (p, q)
e
−∆θmax
∆θ2
m +sin(θ̂
−jαpq cos(θ̂rem ) re
rem )∆θrem
2
Z
= Ĥrem (p, q)
∆θmax
−∆θmax
f (∆θrem ) d(∆θrem )
m
m
cos ξp,q
− j sin ξp,q
f (∆θrem ) d(∆θrem )
= Γ1m (p, q) − jΓ2m (p, q),
where
Ĥrem (p, q) =
V. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we investigated secure wireless information
and power transfer based on DM in AF relay networks.
Specifically, the robust information beamforming matrix and
the AN covariance matrix were designed based on the SRM1D scheme and on the Max-SLANR scheme. To solve the
optimization problem of SRM, we proposed a twin-level
optimization method that includes a 1D search and the SDR
technique. Furthermore, we proposed a suboptimal solution
for the SRM problem, which was based on the Max-SLANR
criterion. Finally, we formulated a SRM problem, which was
transformed into a SOCP problem, and solved by a lowcomplexity SCA method. Simulation results show that the
performance of the SCA scheme is very close to that of the
SRM-1D scheme in terms of its secrecy rate and bit error rate
(BER), and compared to the ZF scheme, the SCA scheme
and Max-SLANR schemes provide a significant performance
improvement.
A PPENDIX A
D ERIVATION OF Hrem (p, q)
Hrem (p, q) can be expressed as
i
h
)
+
∆θ
(
θ̂
Hrem (p, q) = E hp (θ̂rem + ∆θrem )hH
re
re
m
m
q
Z ∆θmax
grem
ejαpq cos(θ̂rem +∆θrem ) f (∆θrem ) d(∆θrem )
=
N −∆θmax
Z
n
grem ∆θmax
=
exp jαpq cos(θ̂rem ) cos(∆θrem )
N −∆θmax
o
(57)
− sin(θ̂rem ) sin(∆θrem ) f (∆θrem ) d(∆θrem ),
where αpq = 2π(q−p)l
. Assuming ∆θmax is a small value
λ
near zero, we get the following approximate expression using
second-order Taylor expansion
sin(∆θrem ) ≈∆θrem
2
∆θre
m
.
cos(∆θrem ) ≈1 −
2
(58)
(59)
grem jαpq cos(θ̂rem )
e
N
(60)
represents the p-th row and q-th column entry of
h(θ̂rem )hH (θ̂rem ), and
2
∆θre
m
m
ξp,q = αpq cos(θ̂rem )
+ sin(θ̂rem )∆θrem , (61a)
2
Γ1m (p, q) =
Z ∆θmax
m
cos ξp,q
f (∆θrem ) d(∆θrem ), (61b)
Ĥrem (p, q)
−∆θmax
Γ2m (p, q) =
Z
Ĥrem (p, q)
∆θmax
−∆θmax
m
f (∆θrem ) d(∆θrem ). (61c)
sin ξp,q
Now the task is to derive the analytic expression of Γ1m (p, q)
and Γ2m (p, q). To this end, we first expand the trigonometric
function into the following form
m
=
(62)
cos ξp,q
2
∆θre
m
cos αpq cos(θ̂rem )
+ αpq sin(θ̂rem )∆θrem
2
∆θ2
= cos αpq cos(θ̂rem ) rem cos αpq sin(θ̂rem )∆θrem
2
2
∆θre
m
− sin αpq cos(θ̂rem )
sin αpq sin(θ̂rem )∆θrem .
2
Then using the second-order Taylor series to approximate each
term, we can rewrite (62) as
!
4
2
2
)∆θ
α
cos
(
θ̂
re
m
re
pq
m
m
×
cos ξp,q
= 1−
8
!
2
α2pq sin2 (θ̂rem )∆θre
m
1−
2
2
∆θre
m
αpq sin(θ̂rem )∆θrem
− αpq cos(θ̂rem )
2
1
2
≈ 1 − α2pq sin2 (θ̂rem )∆θre
−
m
2
∆θ2
αpq sin(θ̂rem )∆θrem . (63)
αpq cos(θ̂rem ) rem
2
Since the last term in (63) is an odd function with respect
to ∆θrem , hence we have (64) at the top of the next page.
12
1
2
f (∆θrem ) d(∆θrem )
1 − α2pq sin2 (θ̂rem )∆θre
m
2
−∆θmax
2
∆θmax − 2σ12 ∆θmax
∆θmax
1
∆θmax
(a) Ĥrem (p, q)
2
2
2
θ
√
√
√
,
=
) − αpq sin (θ̂rem )σθ
)−
e
erf(
erf(
Kem
2
2σθ
2σθ
2πσθ
Γ1m (p, q) ≈ Ĥrem (p, q)
Z
∆θmax
(64)
1
2
f (∆θrem ) d(∆θrem )
αpq cos(θ̂rem )∆θre
m
2
−∆θmax
2
∆θmax − 2σ12 ∆θmax
∆θmax
Ĥrem (p, q)αpq cos(θ̂rem )σθ2 1
θ
√
√
)−
e
erf(
=
.
Kem
2
2σθ
2πσθ
Γ2m (p, q) ≈ Ĥrem (p, q)
Z
∆θmax
(67)
L(W̃, Ω, µ, νm , η, ζ, S1 , S2 ) =
Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃) + µ −Ps Tr(A1 W̃) + σ 2 φ(β)Tr(A2 W̃) + φ(β)hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + φ(β)σ 2
+
M
X
m=1
νm Ps Tr(B1m W̃) − βσ 2 Tr(B2m W̃) − βTr(H̄rem Ω) − βσ 2 + η Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃) + Tr(Ω) − Pt
Pmin
H
2
− Tr(S1 W̃) − Tr(S2 Ω).
− ζ Ps Tr(D1 W̃) + σ Tr(D2 W̃) + h (θrp )Ωh(θrp ) −
ρ
Note that step (a) in (64) results from the following equation
[46]
√
Z x
1
π
−q2 x2
2 −q2 t2
, (65)
erf(qx) − qxe
t e
dt = 3
2q
2
0
Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions related to the proof
are given as follows
S⋆1 = Ps C1 + σ 2 IN 2 − µ⋆ Ps A1 + µ⋆ σ 2 φ(β)A2 +
Ps
where erf(x) represents the error function defined as
2
erf(x) = √
π
Z
x
e
−t2
(69)
M
X
m=1
⋆
νm
B1m − βσ 2
M
X
⋆
νm
B2m + η ⋆ Ps C1 +
m=1
η ⋆ σ 2 IN 2 − ζ ⋆ Ps D1 − ζ ⋆ σ 2 D2 ,
dt.
(66)
0
Using a similar method as above, Γ2m (p, q) can be approximated as (67) at the top of the page. Combining (59), (64)
and (67), we obtain the analytic expression of Hrem (p, q) and
the proof is completed.
S⋆2 = µ⋆ φ(β)h(θrd )hH (θrd ) − β
⋆
⋆
H
η IN − ζ h(θrp )h (θrp ),
(70a)
M
X
⋆
νm
Hrem +
m=1
(70b)
S⋆1 W̃⋆ = 0, S⋆2 Ω⋆ = 0, S⋆1 0, S⋆2 0, W̃ 0.
(70c)
From (70b), we arrive at:
Ps h∗ (θsr )hT (θsr ) + σ 2 IN ⊗ S⋆2 = µ⋆ Ps φ(β)A1 +
A PPENDIX B
P ROOF OF L EMMA 1
µ⋆ σ 2 φ(β)A2 − βPs
The optimization problem (28) can be rewritten as
M
X
m=1
⋆
νm
B1m − βσ 2
M
X
⋆
νm
B2m +
m=1
η ⋆ Ps C1 + η ⋆ σ 2 IN 2 − ζ ⋆ Ps D1 − ζ ⋆ σ 2 D2 .
min Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃)
(71)
Substituting (71) into (70a), we have
W̃,Ω
S⋆1 + µ⋆ Ps [φ(β) + 1] A1 = Ξ,
s.t. − Ps Tr(A1 W̃) + σ 2 φ(β)Tr(A2 W̃)+
φ(β)hH (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + φ(β)σ 2 ≤ 0,
(25b), (25c), (25d), W̃ 0, Ω 0.
(72)
where
(68)
Since the problem (68) satisfies Slater’s constraint qualification [40], its objective function and constraints are convex, and
the optimal solution must satisfy KKT conditions. The Lagrangian of (68) is given in (69) at the top of the page, where
µ, νm , η, ζ, S1 and S2 denote the dual variables associated
with the constraint in (68). Let W̃⋆ , Ω⋆ be the optimal primal
⋆
variables and µ⋆ , νm
, η ⋆ , ζ ⋆ , S⋆1 , S⋆2 be the dual variables. The
Ξ =σ 2 IN 2 + Ps C1 + Ps (β + 1)
M
X
⋆
νm
B1m +
m=1 ⋆
Ps h (θsr )h (θsr ) + σ IN ⊗ S2 .
(73)
µ⋆ Ps (φ(β) + 1) A1 W̃⋆ = ΞW̃⋆ .
(74)
∗
T
2
Let us multiply both sides of (72) by W̃⋆ and substitute the
first term of (70c) into the resultant equation, yielding:
13
Since Ps h∗ (θsr )hT (θsr ) + σ 2 IN is a Hermitian positive
definite matrix, and S⋆2 0, according to the fact that [47]
λ(X ⊗ Y) = {µi γj , µi ∈ λ(X), γj ∈ λ(Y)},
Substituting (80) into (79a), we have
S⋆1 + µ⋆ Ps (1 + φ) A1 = Ξ,
where
we have
2
T
∗
Ps h (θsr )h (θsr ) + σ IN ⊗
S⋆2
0,
(76)
where λ(•) denotes the set of matrix eigenvalues. Upon
observing that the first term in (73) is the identity matrix
and the other three terms are Hermitian semidefinite matrices,
we have Ξ ≻ 0. By exploiting the fact that rank(AB) ≤
min{rank(A), rank(B)}, we obtain
rank(ΞW̃⋆ ) = rank(W̃⋆ ) ≤ rank(µ⋆ Ps (φ(β) + 1) A1 ).
(77)
Combining (74) with (77) and considering that A1 is a rankone matrix, we conclude that rank(W̃⋆ ) = 1 for µ⋆ > 0,
rank(W̃⋆ ) = 0 for µ⋆ = 0. However, W̃⋆ = 0 corresponds to no signal transmission. Hence we can conclude that
rank(W̃⋆ ) = 1, and the proof is completed.
A PPENDIX C
P ROOF OF L EMMA 2
Since the problem (36) satisfies Slater’s constraint qualification [40], its objective function and constraints are convex,
and the optimal solution must satisfy KKT conditions. The
Lagrangian associated with the problem (36) is given by
L(W̃, Ω, µ, η, ζ, S1 , S2 ) = Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃)
M
X
Ps Tr(B1m W̃)
+ µ − Ps Tr(A1 W̃) + φ
m=1
+ φh (θrd )Ωh(θrd ) + φσ 2 Tr(A2 W̃) + φσ 2
+ η Ps Tr(C1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(W̃) + Tr(Ω) − Pt
− ζ Ps Tr(D1 W̃) + σ 2 Tr(D2 W̃) + hH (θrp )Ωh(θrp )
Pmin
−
(78)
− Tr(S1 W̃) − Tr(S1 W̃) − Tr(S2 Ω),
ρ
H
where µ, η, ζ, S1 and S2 are dual variables associated with
the constraint in (36), while W̃⋆ , Ω⋆ are the optimal primal
variables and µ⋆ , η ⋆ , ζ ⋆ , S⋆1 , S⋆2 are dual variables. The KKT
conditions that are relevant to the proof are given by
S⋆1 = Ps C1 − µ⋆ Ps A1 + µ⋆ φσ 2 A2 + µ⋆ φPs
M
X
B1m +
m=1
⋆ 2
σ 2 IN 2 + η ⋆ Ps C1 + η ⋆ σ 2 IN 2 − ζ ⋆ Ps D1 − ζ σ D2 , (79a)
S⋆2 = µ⋆ φh(θrd )hH (θrd ) + η ⋆ IN − ζ ⋆ h(θrp )hH (θrp ),
(79b)
S⋆1 W̃⋆ = 0, S⋆2 Ω⋆ = 0, S⋆1 0, S⋆2 0, W̃ 0.
(79c)
From (79b), we get
Ps h∗ (θsr )hT (θsr ) + σ 2 IN ⊗ S⋆2 = µ⋆ Ps φA1 +
(80)
⋆ 2
⋆
⋆ 2
⋆
⋆ 2
(81)
(75)
µ σ φA2 + η Ps C1 + η σ IN 2 − ζ Ps D1 − ζ σ D2 .
Ξ =σ 2 IN 2 + Ps C1 + µ⋆ φPs
Ps h∗ (θsr )hT (θsr ) +
M
X
m=1
σ 2 IN
B1m +
⊗ S⋆2 .
(82)
It is clear from (82) that Ξ is a Hermitian positive definite
matrix. The remaining steps of the proof are similar to the
Lemma 1 and is omitted here. The proof is completed.
R EFERENCES
[1] Q. Wu, W. Chen, D. W. K. Ng, and R. Schober, “Spectral and energy
efficient wireless powered IoT networks: Noma or tdma?” IEEE Trans.
Veh. Technol., vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–1, 2018.
[2] Q. Wu, M. Tao, and W. Chen, “Joint Tx/Rx energy-efficient scheduling
in multi-radio wireless networks: A divide-and-conquer approach,” IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2727–2740, Apr. 2016.
[3] H. Son and B. Clerckx, “Joint beamforming design for multi-user wireless information and power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.,
vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 6397–6409, Nov 2014.
[4] Z. Chu, Z. Zhu, M. Johnston, and S. Y. L. Goff, “Simultaneous wireless
information power transfer for MISO secrecy channel,” IEEE Trans. Veh.
Technol., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 6913–6925, Sep. 2016.
[5] H. Zhang, Y. Huang, C. Li, and L. Yang, “Secure beamforming design
for SWIPT in MISO broadcast channel with confidential messages and
external eavesdroppers,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 11,
pp. 7807–7819, Nov. 2016.
[6] D. W. K. Ng, E. S. Lo, and R. Schober, “Robust beamforming for
secure communication in systems with wireless information and power
transfer,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 4599–4615,
Aug. 2013.
[7] W. Wu and B. Wang, “Robust secrecy beamforming for wireless information and power transfer in multiuser MISO communication system,”
Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications Networking, vol. 2015,
no. 1, pp. 161–171, Jun. 2015.
[8] Q. Wu, G. Li, W. Chen, and D. W. K. Ng, “Energy-efficient small cell
with spectrum-power trading,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 34,
no. 12, pp. 3394–3408, Dec. 2016.
[9] M. R. A. Khandaker and K. K. Wong, “Robust secrecy beamforming
with energy-harvesting eavesdroppers,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett.,
vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10–13, Feb. 2015.
[10] W. Mei, Z. Chen, and J. Fang, “Artificial noise aided energy efficiency
optimization in MIMOME system with SWIPT,” IEEE Commun. Lett.,
vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1795–1798, Aug 2017.
[11] Z. Xun, Z. Rui, and C. K. Ho, “Wireless information and power transfer:
Architecture design and rate-energy tradeoff,” IEEE Trans. Commun.,
vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 4754–4767, Nov. 2013.
[12] R. Zhang and C. K. Ho, “MIMO broadcasting for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.,
vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1989–2001, May. 2013.
[13] Q. Wu, G. Y. Li, W. Chen, D. W. K. Ng, and R. Schober, “An overview
of sustainable green 5G networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 24,
no. 4, pp. 72–80, Aug 2017.
[14] Q. Wu, M. Tao, D. W. K. Ng, W. Chen, and R. Schober, “Energy-efficient
resource allocation for wireless powered communication networks,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2312–2327, March
2016.
[15] Q. Wu, W. Chen, D. W. K. Ng, J. Li, and R. Schober, “User-centric
energy efficiency maximization for wireless powered communications,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 6898–6912, Oct.
2016.
[16] Q. Wu, G. Li, W. Chen, and D. W. K. Ng, “Energy-efficient d2d
overlaying communications with spectrum-power trading,” IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4404–4419, Jul 2017.
[17] X. Chen, D. W. K. Ng, and H. H. Chen, “Secrecy wireless information and power transfer: challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Wireless
Commun., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 54–61, Apr. 2015.
14
[18] Y. Zou, J. Zhu, X. Wang, and L. Hanzo, “A survey on wireless security:
Technical challenges, recent advances, and future trends,” Proc. IEEE,
vol. 104, no. 9, pp. 1727–1765, Sep. 2015.
[19] Y. Zou, B. Champagne, W. P. Zhu, and L. Hanzo, “Relay-selection
improves the security-reliability trade-off in cognitive radio systems,”
IEEE Trans. Commu., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 215–228, Jan. 2014.
[20] Y. Huang and B. Clerckx, “Relaying strategies for wireless-powered
mimo relay networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 9,
pp. 6033–6047, Sep 2016.
[21] P. Liu, S. Gazor, I. M. Kim, and D. I. Kim, “Noncoherent relaying
in energy harvesting communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 6940–6954, Dec 2015.
[22] Q. Li, Q. Zhang, and J. Qin, “Secure relay beamforming for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer in nonregenerative relay
networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 2462–2467,
Jun. 2014.
[23] A. Salem, K. A. Hamdi, and K. M. Rabie, “Physical layer security with
RF energy harvesting in AF multi-antenna relaying networks,” IEEE
Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 3025–3038, Jul. 2016.
[24] Q. Li, Q. Zhang, and J. Qin, “Secure relay beamforming for SWIPT
in amplify-and-forward two-way relay networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh.
Technol., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 9006–9019, Nov. 2016.
[25] H. Xing, K. K. Wong, Z. Chu, and A. Nallanathan, “To harvest and jam:
A paradigm of self-sustaining friendly jammers for secure AF relaying,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 24, pp. 6616–6631, Dec. 2015.
[26] Y. Feng, Z. Yang, W. P. Zhu, Q. Li, and B. Lv, “Robust cooperative
secure beamforming for simultaneous wireless information and power
transfer in amplify-and-forward relay networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh.
Technol., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 2354–2366, Mar. 2017.
[27] B. Li, Z. Fei, Z. Chu, and Y. Zhang, “Secure transmission for heterogeneous cellular networks with wireless information and power transfer,”
IEEE Syst. J., vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–12, 2017.
[28] H. Niu, B. Zhang, D. Guo, and Y. Huang, “Joint robust design for secure
AF relay networks with SWIPT,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 9369–9377,
2017.
[29] B. Li, Z. Fei, and H. Chen, “Robust artificial noise-aided secure beamforming in wireless-powered non-regenerative relay networks,” IEEE
Access, vol. 4, pp. 7921–7929, 2016.
[30] M. P. Daly and J. T. Bernhard, “Directional modulation technique for
phased arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2633–
2640, Sep 2009.
[31] Y. Ding and V. Fusco, “A vector approach for the analysis and synthesis
of directional modulation transmitters,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 361–370, Jan. 2014.
[32] ——, “Orthogonal vector approach for synthesis of multi-beam directional modulation transmitters,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett.,
vol. 14, pp. 1330–1333, 2015.
[33] J. Hu, F. Shu, and J. Li, “Robust synthesis method for secure directional modulation with imperfect direction angle,” IEEE Commun. Lett.,
vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1084–1087, Jun. 2016.
[34] F. Shu, X. Wu, J. Li, R. Chen, and B. Vucetic, “Robust synthesis scheme
for secure multi-beam directional modulation in broadcasting systems,”
IEEE Access, vol. 4, no. 99, pp. 6614–6623, 2016.
[35] L. Liu, R. Zhang, and K. C. Chua, “Secrecy wireless information and
power transfer with MISO beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process.,
vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1850–1863, Apr. 2014.
[36] L. Dong, Z. Han, A. P. Petropulu, and H. V. Poor, “Improving wireless
physical layer security via cooperating relays,” IEEE Trans. Signal
Process., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1875–1888, Mar. 2010.
[37] A. Mukherjee and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Robust beamforming for security
in MIMO wiretap channels with imperfect CSI,” IEEE Trans. Signal
Process., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 351–361, Jan. 2011.
[38] A. M. Alam, P. Mary, J. Y. Baudais, and X. Lagrange, “Asymptotic
analysis of area spectral efficiency and energy efficiency in PPP networks
with SLNR precoder,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 3172–
3185, Jul. 2017.
[39] A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper, “Programming with linear fractional
functionals,” Naval Research Logistics, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 181–186,
1962.
[40] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization. Cambridge U.K.:
Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004.
[41] Q. Li, Y. Yang, W. K. Ma, M. Lin, J. Ge, and J. Lin, “Robust cooperative
beamforming and artificial noise design for physical-layer secrecy in
AF multi-antenna multi-relay networks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process.,
vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 206–220, Jan. 2015.
[42] F. Shu, J. Tong, X. You, G. U. Chen, and W. U. Jiajun, “Adaptive robust
Max-SLNR precoder for MU-MIMO-OFDM systems with imperfect
CSI,” Science China Information Sciences, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1–14,
Jul. 2016.
[43] A. A. Nasir, H. D. Tuan, T. Q. Duong, and H. V. Poor, “Secrecy
rate beamforming for multicell networks with information and energy
harvesting,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 677–689,
Feb 2017.
[44] A. Zappone, E. Bjornson, L. Sanguinetti, and E. Jorswieck, “Globally
optimal energy-efficient power control and receiver design in wireless
networks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 2844–2859,
Jun. 2017.
[45] K. Y. Wang, A. M. C. So, T. H. Chang, W. K. Ma, and C. Y. Chi, “Outage
constrained robust transmit optimization for multiuser miso downlinks:
Tractable approximations by conic optimization,” IEEE Trans. Signal
Process., vol. 62, no. 21, pp. 5690–5705, Nov 2014.
[46] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and
Products, Seventh Edition. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic, 2007.
[47] G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix computations. John Hopkins
University Press, 1996.
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv:1710.01696v1 [math.ST] 4 Oct 2017
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF THE LATENT CLASS
MODEL THROUGH MODEL BOUNDARY DECOMPOSITION
ELIZABETH ALLMAN, HECTOR BAÑOS CERVANTES, ROBIN EVANS, SERKAN HOŞTEN,
KAIE KUBJAS, DANIEL LEMKE, JOHN RHODES, AND PIOTR ZWIERNIK
Abstract. The Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm is routinely used for the maximum likelihood estimation in the latent class analysis. However, the EM algorithm comes
with no guarantees of reaching the global optimum. We study the geometry of the latent
class model in order to understand the behavior of the maximum likelihood estimator. In
particular, we characterize the boundary stratification of the binary latent class model with
a binary hidden variable. For small models, such as for three binary observed variables, we
show that this stratification allows exact computation of the maximum likelihood estimator. In this case we use simulations to study the maximum likelihood estimation attraction
basins of the various strata. Our theoretical study is complemented with a careful analysis
of the EM fixed point ideal which provides an alternative method of studying the boundary
stratification and maximizing the likelihood function. In particular, we compute the minimal
primes of this ideal in the case of a binary latent class model with a binary or ternary hidden
random variable.
1. Introduction
Latent class models are popular models used in social sciences and machine learning. They
were introduced in the 1950s by Paul Lazarsfeld [23] and were used to find groups in a
population based on a hidden attribute (see also [24]). The model obtained its modern
probabilistic formulation in the 1970s (e.g. [16]). We refer to [11] for a more detailed literature
review. More recently, latent class models became also widely used in machine learning, where
they are called naive Bayes models. They became a popular method of text categorization
and of other types of classification schemes [4, Section 8.2.2].
The latent class model is an instance of a model with incomplete data. The maximum
likelihood estimation of such models may be challenging, and this is typically done via the
EM algorithm [8]. Stephen Fienberg in his discussion [10] of the paper introducing the EM
algorithm shed some light on the potential problems with this algorithm. His comments
are relevant in our case of the latent class model. Referring to [17] Fienberg noted two
main problems: (a) even for cases where the likelihood for the problem with complete data is
concave, the likelihood for the incomplete problem need not be concave, and (b) the likelihood
equations may not have a solution in the interior of the parameter space. He then wrote:
In the first case multiple solutions of the likelihood equations can exist, not
simply a ridge of solutions corresponding to a lack of identification of parameters, and in the second case the solutions of the likelihood equations occur on
the boundary of the parameter space,[. . . ].
Date: 30 September 2017.
Kubjas was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Marie
Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 748354).
1
The latent class model can be formulated as a graphical model with an unobserved variable
defined by a star graph like in Figure 1. The one-factor analysis model is a Gaussian model
with the same graphical representation, and there are many parallels between these two
models. Given that the variable for the internal vertex was observed, the underlying model
becomes a simple instance of an exponential family; so it admits a concave likelihood function
with a closed formula for the maximizer. However, the marginal likelihood will typically have
many critical points, and the maxima may lie on the boundary of the model. In practice, to
avoid the boundary problem, Bayesian methods need to be employed to push the solutions
away from the boundary by using appropriate priors [13].
2
1
3
5
4
Figure 1. The star graph model with 5 leaves. The internal vertex represents an
unobserved random variable.
1.1. Outline of Results. Our aim is to study the boundary problem for the latent class
model from the perspective of maximum likelihood estimation. We will use the link between
the latent class models and nonnegative tensor rank. For instance, the latent class model with
three binary observed variables and one binary hidden variable is the model of normalized
nonnegative 2 × 2 × 2 tensors of nonnegative rank (rank+ ) at most two. We will rely on
recent work in algebraic statistics on the description of the (algebraic) boundary of tensors of
nonnegative rank two [2]. Our Theorem 9 gives a complete characterization of the boundary
strata of binary latent class models with a binary hidden variable.
The geometry of these models allows us to identify boundary strata for which the maximum likelihood problem is easy, such as certain codimension two strata; see Section 4.1. In
Section 4.2, we will showcase the use of Theorem 9 for the maximum likelihood estimation
in the 2 × 2 × 2 case of rank+ ≤ 2 by solving the problem exactly: we will provide a formula
for the maximizer of the likelihood function over the algebraic set defining each boundary
strata. Together with the recent work in [27], this is the first non-trivial example of the exact
solution provided for a latent class model, which typically is fitted using the EM algorithm.
The geometry used for this exact solution provides also insight into the maximum likelihood
estimation in this model class, validating some of the concerns of Fienberg. We report the
results of our simulations which show that overwhelming majority of data has a maximum
likelihood estimator on the boundary of the model (where some model parameters are zero).
In fact, under certain scenarios, even if the true underlying distribution lies in the interior
of the model, the maximum likelihood estimator may be found on the boundary with high
probability.
In Section 5, we study the algebraic description of the fixed points of the EM algorithm
inspired by [21]. Here, we no longer look at just the cases where rank+ ≤ 2. In particular, we
compute the irreducible components of the EM fixed-point ideal for the 2 × 2 × 2 tensors of
rank+ ≤ 2 (Section 5) and of rank+ ≤ 3 (Section 6). In the first case, we demonstrate that we
can recover the formulas in Section 4.2 from certain components of the EM fixed-point ideal
2
via elimination. We will also prove Theorem 27 which shows that, essentially, the zero set of
the EM-fixed point ideal is the same as the zero set of the ideal corresponding to the KarushKuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions of the likelihood optimization problem. This result provides
a different angle for looking at the EM-fixed point ideals since it implies that the equations
of the EM-fixed point ideal as in Proposition 25 are just the complementary slackness part of
the KKT conditions.
We close in Section 6 by suggesting future directions for research. In particular, we give
the minimal primes of the EM fixed-point ideal for the 2 × 2 × 2 tensors of rank+ ≤ 3. Our
work on the EM fixed point ideal validates the results in [27]. We also examine briefly the
model of 3 × 3 × 2 tensors of nonnegative rank 3. Our simulations indicate that this model
occupies a tiny portion (approximately .019%) of the probability simplex.
2. Definitions and Background
If X is a random variable with values in {1, . . . , k} then its distribution is a point (p1 , . . . , pk )
in the probability simplex
∆k−1 = {(x1 , . . . , xk ) ∈
Rk
: x1 + . . . + xk = 1, x1 , . . . , xk ≥ 0}.
The vector X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ) is a binary random vector if Xi ∈ {1, 2} for each 1 ≤ i ≤ n. A
binary tensor P = (pi1 ···in ), where ij ∈ {1, 2}, is a 2 × 2 × · · · × 2 table of real numbers in
n
R2×···×2 = R2 . A tensor is nonnegative if it has only nonnegative entries. Every probability
distribution for a binary vector X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ) is a nonnegative binary tensor in the
probability simplex ∆2n −1 :
pi1 i2 ···in = Prob({X1 = i1 , X2 = i2 , . . . , Xn = in }).
The binary latent class model Mn,r is a statistical model for a vector of n binary random
variables X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ). It contains all distributions such that X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn are independent given an unobserved random variable with r ≥ 1 states. The model is therefore
parameterized by the distribution λ = (λ1 , λ2 , . . . , λr ) ∈ ∆r−1 of the unobserved variable and
the conditional distributions of each Xi given the unobserved variable, which we write in form
of a stochastic matrix
(i) (i)
a11 a12
.
.
(i)
..
A =
, i = 1, . . . , n,
..
(i)
(i)
ar1 ar2
(i)
(i)
where A(i) ≥ 0 and aj1 + aj2 = 1 for each j = 1, . . . , r. Letting Cn denote the n-dimensional
cube ∆n1 , then the parameter space of Mn,r is Θ := ∆r−1 × (Cn )r with elements
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
θ = (λ1 , . . . , λr , a11 , a12 , . . . , ar1 , ar2 , . . . , a11 , a12 , . . . , ar1 , ar2 ).
To be succinct, a choice of parameters θ is also denoted by θ = (λ, A(1) , A(2) , . . . , A(n) ). The
parameterization φn,r : Θ → ∆2n −1 of Mn,r is given by
(1)
φn,r :
θ
7→
(1) (2)
(n)
(1) (2)
(n)
pj1 j2 ···jn (θ) = λ1 a1j1 a1j2 · · · a1jn + · · · + λr arj1 arj2 · · · arjn .
This parameterization shows that the distributions in Mn,r admit a decomposition into r
summands, which can be phrased in terms of tensor decompositions. A binary tensor P has
rank one if it is an outer product of n vectors in R2 , that is, there exist u1 , . . . , un ∈ R2 such
3
that pi1 i2 ···in = u1i1 u2i2 · · · unin . A nonnegative tensor of rank one can be always written as
the outer product of nonnegative vectors in R2≥0 . A tensor has nonnegative rank (rank+ ) at
most r if it can be written as a sum of r nonnegative tensors of rank one. Equivalently, a
n
binary tensor with rank+ ≤ r is a point in the image of a map ψn,r : (R2≥0 )nr −→ R2 defined
as
r
r
n Y
X
Y
(1) (2)
(n)
(i) (i)
uji1 uji2 · · · ujin .
(uj1 , uj2 ) 7→ pi1 i2 ···in =
ψn,r :
j=1
i=1 j=1
For more on the connection between tensor rank, nonnegative tensor rank, and several of
the latent class models under consideration here, see, for example, [1, 7] or for a connection
to phylogenetic models [3]. Here we simply formulate the following result.
Proposition 1. The set of binary tensors with rank+ ≤ r is the cone over the binary latent
class model Mn,r .
In this paper we focus primarily on models with two latent classes, r = 2, and write
Mn := Mn,2 and φn := φn,2 . Binary tensors of rank+ ≤ 2 were studied in [2], where the
following theorem gives a description of Mn as a semi-algebraic set.
Theorem 2. [2, cf. Theorem 1.1] A binary tensor P = (pi1 i2 ···in ) has nonnegative rank at
most two if and only if P has flattening rank at most two and P is supermodular.
A matrix flattening of the binary tensor P is a 2|Γ| × 2n−|Γ| matrix where Γ ⊂ {1, . . . , n}
with 1 ≤ |Γ| ≤ n − 1. The flattening rank is the maximal rank of any of these matrices. This
rank condition provides the equations for the semi-algebraic description since the rank of a
matrix is at most two if and only if all 3−minors of that matrix vanish. Now, we briefly also
explain the supermodularity. Let π = (π1 , . . . , πn ) be an n-tuple of permutations πj ∈ S2 .
We say P is π−supermodular if
(2)
pi1 i2 ···in pj1 j2 ···jn ≤ pk1 k2 ···kn pℓ1 ℓ2 ···ℓn
holds when {is , js } = {ks , ℓs } and πs (ks ) ≤ πs (ℓs ) for s = 1, . . . , n. The tensor P is supermodular if it is π−supermodular for some π.
Corollary 3. The semi-algebraic description of P
the binary latent class model is given by
Theorem 2 together with the extra constraint that i1 ,...,in pi1 ···in = 1.
We close this section with a result that will simplify some of our arguments regarding the
boundary stratification of Mn .
Lemma 4. Let Mn,r be the latent class model for the random vector X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ), and
let B ⊂ {1, . . . , n} with |B| = m. Then the induced marginal model for XB = (Xi : i ∈ B) is
Mm,r . In particular, if P is a tensor in Mn,r given by parameters (λ1 , . . . , λr , A(1) , . . . , A(n) ),
then the corresponding marginal distribution PB is given by parameters λ1 , . . . , λr , and A(i)
for i ∈ B.
Proof. The marginal distribution PB is obtained from P = (pj1 ...jn ) by summing over all
indices jk with k ∈
/ B. When we compute the sum using the parameterization (1) the result
(k)
(k)
follows because ai1 + ai2 = 1 for all i = 1, . . . , r.
4
3. Boundary Stratification of Mn
The semi-algebraic description of Mn can be further used to understand the topological
boundary of this set. We begin our analysis with the following proposition.
Proposition 5. The dimension of the model Mn is 2n + 1. The boundary of this semialgebraic set is defined by 2n irreducible components. Each component is the image of the set
(i)
in the domain of φn given by a1j = 0 for i = 1, . . . , n and j = 1, 2.
Proof. The dimension of Mn can be easily computed by counting independent parameters
in the domain of φn . The statement about the boundary is Theorem 1.2 in [2], and the
statement about each component is found in the proof of the same result.
(i)
Observe that these components are also defined by a2j = 0, but one can interchange the
first and second rows of the matrices A(i) and get the same points on the boundary. Each
such component is the collection of tensors where one slice has rank one. Here by a slice of a
tensor P = (pi1 ···in ) we mean a subtensor obtained by fixing one index ik . We note that for
general tensors with nonnegative rank bigger than two, the boundary of the corresponding
model M is not well understood. For instance, points on the boundary of the parameter
space defined by setting one parameter equal to zero no longer map to the boundary of the
model M; see Section 6.1 as well as Example 5.2 in [2]. A recent development is [27] where
the boundary of M3,3 has been described.
In this paper, we consider also lower dimensional pieces of the boundary of Mn . Our
motivation is to perform maximum likelihood estimation over such models efficiently. Proposition 5 implies that various intersections of the 2n irreducible codimension one components
define lower dimensional boundary pieces. We call a set of boundary points of dimension k
obtained as such an intersection a k-dimensional stratum. We will identify and describe the
boundary strata that are relevant for maximum likelihood estimation. The relevant boundary
strata are those which are not degenerate.
Definition 1. The degenerate part of ∆2n −1 is the set of tensors P = (pi1 ···in ) where for fixed
1 ≤ j < k ≤ n and a choice ij = s and ik = t with s, t ∈ {1, 2} the entries pi1 ···s···t···in = 0 for
all iu , u 6= j, k.
Another way of detecting that a binary tensor P is degenerate is to look at the marginal
table P{j,k} . If any of the entries of this 2 × 2 table is zero for any j, k, then P is degenerate.
For instance, if
p11 p12
α 0
P{j,k} =
=
p21 p22
β γ
with α, β, γ > 0, then knowing that Xj = 1 implies that Xk = 1. By restricting to nondegenerate tensors, we will avoid this kind of probabilistically degenerate situations. We note
that our main theorem could be formulated only for the interior of the probability simplex.
From the mathematical point of view, extending it to some parts of the boundary seems like
an incremental gain. As we will see later, from the statistical point of view, the gain is quite
dramatic because it allows us to understand the maximum likelihood estimation even when
the data tables contain zeros (as long as two-way marginal tables have no zeros). This will
be especially important to validate our simulations in Section 4, when the sample sizes are
relatively small.
5
3.1. Singular locus of the parametrization map. To state and prove our main result,
we need an understanding of the singular locus of the parameterization map φn . Recall that
a point of the domain Θ is a singular point of φn if the Jacobian of the map drops rank at
this point. To describe this set, we look at various (overlapping) subsets of the parameter
space. Specifically, let
Θλ1 λ2 ⊆ Θ be the subset defined by λ1 λ2 = 0;
Θij ⊆ Θ be the subset where rank(A(k) ) = 1 for all k 6= i, j with 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n; and
Θj ⊆ Θ be the subset where rank(A(k) ) = 1 for all k 6= j.
Finally, we denote by Θ1 the subset of Θ where rank(A(k) ) = 1 for all k. It is clear that
Θij = Θji and Θ1 ⊂ Θk ⊂ Θjk for all 1 ≤ j 6= k ≤ n.
Remark : For those familiar with tensor decompositions, these subsets of parameters have simple descriptions in terms of the ranks of the matrices A(i) . Suppose that θ = (λ, A(1) , . . . , A(n) ),
then the m-rank of θ is the n-tuple (rank(A(1) ), . . . , rank(A(n) )). In this setting, we see that,
for example, Θ12 corresponds to parameters with m-rank (r1 , r2 , 1, 1, . . . , 1) with r1 , r2 ≤ 2.
The subset Θ1 corresponds to parameters with m-rank (r1 , 1, 1, . . . , 1), and Θ1 to those parameters with m-rank (1, 1, . . . , 1). Indeed, this perspective makes it quite easy to determine
the singular locus of φn .
S
Proposition 6. The singular locus of the parametrization map φn is equal to Θλ1 λ2 ∪ 1≤i6=j≤n Θij .
Proof. It is clear that the image of Θλ1 λ2 and Θ1 map under φn to distributions in Mn of nonnegative rank 1, and thus that the Jacobian drops rank at these points. A simple computation
shows that φn maps points in Θk to tensors of rank+ = 1, and the Jacobian is rank deficient
at these parameter points too. Consider now those parameters θ with (up to permutation)
m-rank (2, 2, 1, . . . , 1) and, without loss of generality, θ ∈
/ Θλ1 ,λ2 . Let Pθ = φn (θ). We quickly
show that Pθ has nonnegative rank 2, and that θ is a singular point of the parameterization. Since A(3) , . . . , A(n) are singular matrices, let v be the tensor product of their top rows.
Stated in more statistical language, v is the (vectorized) joint distribution of the independent
binary variables X3 , . . . , Xn . Using A(1) , A(2) for the matrix parameters of rank 2, then the
joint distribution Pθ is Pθ = (A(1) )T diag([λ1 , λ2 ]) A(2) ⊗ v. Since (A(1) )T diag([λ1 , λ2 ]) A(2)
is a rank 2 matrix, Pθ is a rank 2 tensor. However, the fiber of Pθ is positive dimensional.
This follows because the matrix factorization (A(1) )T diag([λ1 , λ2 ]) A(2) above is not unique.
If Σ is taken to be any matrix sufficiently close to the identity andwith
column sums equal
1
(1)
T
(1)
−1
(2)
to 1, then Ã
= Σ A is Markov, λ̃ = Σ diag([λ1 , λ2 ])A
has positive entries,
1
Ã(2) = diag(λ̃)−1 Σ−1 diag([λ1 , λ2 ])A(2) is Markov, and φn (λ̃, Ã(1) , Ã(2) , A(3) , . . . A(n) ) also
equals Pθ . It follows that θ is a singular point of the parameterization φn .
Finally, consider parameters θ of m-rank (2, 2, 2, r4 , . . . , rn ) up to permutation, θ ∈
/ Θλ1 λ2 .
Then by Kruskal’s Theorem [19, 20] together with techniques developed in [1] for proving
parameter identifiability, θ is identifiable and the fiber of Pθ is of size 2. This means that θ
is not a singular point of φn .
This result is not new, cf. [25, Corollary 7.17]. It could be also inferred from Theorem 13
and Theorem 14 in [14]. The proof above is based on ideas from [1] and [7].
Next, we state and prove two lemmas which we will use in the proof of Theorem 9 repeatedly.
Lemma 7. φn (Θij ) is an (n + 1)-dimensional subset of ∆2n −1 isomorphic to ∆3 × (∆1 )n−2 .
6
Proof. A 2 × 2 stochastic matrix has rank one if and only if both of its rows are equal.
Therefore, points in the image of Θij are of the form
Y (l)
(i) (j)
(i) (j)
pk1 ···kn = (λ1 a1ki a1kj + λ2 a2ki a2kj )
a1kl .
l6=i,j
It is then clear that φn (Θij ) is a subset of ∆2n −1 isomorphic to ∆3 × (∆1 )n−2 . The equality
follows from a well-known fact that M2 = ∆3 , see, e.g., [15, Corollary 2.2].
(k)
Lemma 8. The parametrization φn maps Θij ∩ {ast = 0} for k 6= i, j and s, t ∈ {1, 2} to the
degenerate part of the boundary of ∆2n −1 .
(k)
(k)
Proof. Consider the case a11 = 0. Then a12 = 1, and since A(k) has rank one we conclude
(k)
(k)
that a21 = 0 and a22 = 1. This means that the first slice of the image tensor along dimension
(k)
k is identically zero. Similar reasoning applies for all ast = 0.
Below we consider the intersection of various subsets of the boundary of Θ with pieces of
the singular locus. Motivated by the last lemma, we will denote Θij ∩ int(Θ) by Θ◦ij . We also
let Θ◦k = Θk ∩ int(Θ).
3.2. Main Theorem. Now we are ready to state our main theorem.
Theorem 9. For n ≤ k ≤ 2n + 1, the k-dimensional strata of the nondegenerate part of Mn
are in bijection with the k − (n + 1)-dimensional faces of the cube
Cn , except for k = 2n − 1
n
when n additional strata are present, and for k = n+1 when 2 additional strata are present.
More precisely,
(1) the interior of Mn has dimension 2n + 1 and each point is the image under φn of a
nonsingular point in the interior of Θ,
(2) except for k = 2n − 1 and k = n + 1, each k-dimensional stratum with k > n is the
image of points in
[
\ (i)
\ (i)
{a = 0}
{a = 0}
1si
2si
si :i∈I
si :i∈I
where |I| = 2n + 1 − k; for k = 2n − 1, a stratum corresponding to a codimension two
face of Cn is the image of points in
[ (i)
[
(i)
(j)
(j)
{a1s = 0} ∩ {a1t = 0}
{a2s = 0} ∩ {a2t = 0}
Θ◦ij ,
for 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n and s, t = 1, 2,
(3) for k = 2n − 1, there are n additional (2n − 1)-dimensional strata; each such stratum
is the image of points in
[ (i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
{a11 = 0} ∩ {a22 = 0} {a12 = 0} ∩ {a21 = 0},
for i = 1, . . . , n,
(4) for k = n + 1, there are n2 additional (n + 1)-dimensional strata; each such stratum
is the image of points in Θ◦ij for 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n,
(5) there is a single n-dimensional stratum corresponding to the empty face of Cn given
by the image of points in Θλ1 λ2 .
7
Corollary 10. Let n ≤ k ≤ 2n + 1 with k = 2n + 1 − ℓ. Then the number of nondegenerate
k-dimensional strata of Mn is
n ℓ
2
ℓ 6= 2, n, n + 1
ℓ
n 4+n
ℓ=2
2
n
n
2
+
ℓ=n
2
1
ℓ = n+1
We turn to the proof of Theorem 9 at the end of this section. First a few comments are in
order. In general, the set of probability distributions contained in a single stratum does not
allow a clean and simple interpretation. Though, in a few cases we do observe nice patterns.
Here we will describe them.
(a) Codimension one strata. The 2n codimension one strata have a simple recursive descrip(1)
(1)
tion. For example, if a11 = 0 then a12 = 1, and the slice (p1j2 ···jn ) of the tensor P is a binary
tensor of rank one. This corresponds to the context specific independence model where
X2 , . . . , Xn are independent conditionally on {X1 = 1}. It is described in the probability
simplex ∆2n−1 −1 by the binomial equations
(3)
p1i2 ···in p1j2 ···jn − p1k2 ···kn p1l2 ···ln = 0
for {is , js } = {ks , ls } and s = 2, . . . , n.
The other slice (p2j2 ···jn ), after normalization, is a tensor from the model Mn−1 . Hence,
knowing the description of Mn−1 will help describe the codimension one strata of Mn .
(b) The exceptional codimension two strata (type (3)). If A(1) is the identity matrix, then the
parameterization in (1) specializes to
(2)
(n)
(2)
p1j2 ···jn = λ1 a1j2 · · · a1jn ,
(n)
p2j2 ···jn = λ2 a2j2 · · · a2jn .
Since A(2) , . . . , A(n) are arbitrary stochastic matrices, this strata of type (3) corresponds to
the conditional independence model, where X2 , . . . , Xn are independent conditionally on X1 .
This is a graphical model given by the graph in Figure 2. This model is fully described in the
probability simplex ∆2n −1 by the binomial equations
pii2 ···in pij2 ···jn − pik2 ···kn pil2 ···ln = 0 for i = 1, 2, {is , js } = {ks , ls } and s = 2, . . . , n
with no additional inequalities. The analysis is analogous for the n − 1 remaining strata given
by one of A(2) , . . . , A(n) being the identity matrix.
(c) The n dimensional stratum (type(5)). This unique stratum is given by all rank one tensors
in ∆2n −1 . This stratum is defined by the equations
pi1 i2 ···in pj1 j2 ···jn − pk1 k2 ···kn pl1 l2 ···ln = 0 if {is , js } = {ks , ls } for s = 1, . . . , n.
The strata of Mn form a partially ordered set where for two strata S, S ′ we have S S ′
if the closure of S is contained in the closure of S ′ . In particular, the interior of Mn is the
unique maximal element, and the unique strata of type (5) is the unique minimal element.
8
2
1
3
5
4
(1)
(1)
Figure 2. The graph representing the strata given by a12 = a21 = 0.
For example for M3 there are six dimension 6 strata, which we label by {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} corresponding to equations
(1) p111 p122 = p112 p121
(2) p211 p222 = p212 p221
(3) p111 p212 = p112 p211
(4) p121 p222 = p122 p221
(5) p111 p221 = p121 p211
(6) p112 p222 = p122 p212
respectively. These six equations are naturally grouped in pairs as indicated by the three
rows above. Each of these three pairs defines one of the three special strata of type (3). In
general, each special stratum of this kind is obtained as the intersection of codimension one
strata which correspond to “opposite” facets of Cn . For M3 , each special stratum of type (4)
is defined by four equations found in two rows of the six equations above. If one ignores these
special strata, the poset is isomorphic to the face poset of the cube Cn . The Hasse diagram
of the poset for M3 is given in Figure 3.
∅
1
12
1234
13
14
135
15
136
2
16
145
23
3
24
146
4
34
1256
5
25
235
26
6
35
236
36
245
45
46
246
56
3456
123456
Figure 3. The boundary stratification poset of M3 . The red and blue nodes correspond to strata of type (3) and of type (4), respectively.
Now we turn to the proof of Theorem 9. The result will follow from a sequence of lemmas.
By Proposition 5 there are exactly 2n strata of codimension one. Each consists of tensors
where in one slice along a given dimension the subtensor has rank at most one. In other
9
words, each strata is described by a collection of equations of the form (3) together with the
inequalities forcing supermodularity. We will denote these strata by Γis where i = 1, . . . , n
and s = 1, 2.
We first formulate a lemma that shows that boundary points are mapped to boundary
points under the marginalization P 7→ PB (c.f. Lemma 4).
Lemma 11. Suppose that n ≥ 4 and let B ⊂ {1, . . . , n} with |B| = m ≥ 3. For i ∈ B, if
a point P in Mn lies on Γis , then PB lies in the corresponding stratum Γis of the marginal
model Mm .
Proof. If P is the image of (λ1 , λ2 , A(k) : k = 1, . . . , n), by Lemma 4, PB is the image of
(λ1 , λ2 , A(k) : k ∈ B). Hence if the slice s in dimension i of P has rank one, so will the slice
s in dimension i of PB .
Proposition 12. The preimage of the codimension one stratum Γis under φn is
[
[
(i)
(i)
∪k6=i Θ◦ik .
φ−1
Θλ1 λ2
n (Γis ) = {a1s = 0} ∪ {a2s = 0}
Proof. We first show that
(i)
(i)
{a1s = 0} ∪ {a2s = 0}
(i)
(i)
[
Θλ1 λ2
[
∪k6=i Θ◦ik ⊂ φ−1
n (Γis ).
Clearly {a1s = 0} ∪ {a2s = 0} ∪ Θλ1 λ2 lies in the preimage. To show that the preimage
contains also Θ◦ik for each k 6= i, note that the image of a point in Θ◦ik is given by
Y (r)
(i) (k)
(i) (k)
a1jr .
pj1 ···ji ···jk ···jn = (λ1 a1ji a1jk + λ2 a2ji a2jk )
r6=i,k
The points on Γis must satisfy pi1 ···s···in pj1 ···s···jn = pν1 ···s···νn pµ1 ···s···µn for {it , jt } = {νt , µt }
where 1 ≤ t 6= i ≤ n. The above point satisfies such equations since
(i) (k)
(i) (k)
(i) (k)
(i) (k)
(λ1 a1s a1ik + λ2 a2s a2ik )(λ1 a1s a1jk + λ2 a2s a2jk ) =
(i) (k)
(i) (k)
(i) (k)
(i) (k)
(λ1 a1s a1νk + λ2 a2s a2νk )(λ1 a1s a1µk + λ2 a2s a2µk ).
Next we show that no other points lie in the preimage. To this end, from now on suppose
S
(i)
(i)
that a1s 6= 0, a2s 6= 0, λ1 · λ2 6= 0 and the parameters are not in k6=i Θ◦ik . Hence we
can assume that P ∈ Γis is given by a parameter vector such that for some j, k 6= i the
matrices A(j) , A(k) have rank 2. Consider the marginal distribution over {i, j, k} and denote
its coordinates by qui uj uk , ui , uj , uk ∈ {1, 2}. By Lemma 11, it is a point in M3 parameterized
by (λ1 , λ2 , A(i) , A(j) , A(k) ), and it satisfies qs11 qs22 = qs12 qs21 . A quick computation shows that
this is equivalent to
(4)
(i) (i)
λ1 λ2 a1s a2s det(A(j) ) det(A(k) ) = 0.
However, by our assumption, this is impossible.
Our strategy to prove Theorem 9 is to intersect preimages of codimension one strata Γis .
Proposition 12 implies that we will have to consider intersections of subsets of the boundary
of the parameter space Θ and intersections of various subsets of the singular locus of φn in
the interior of Θ. When doing this, we would like to disregard two types of intersections. The
first type consists of subsets of the parameter space whose points map to the degenerate part
of ∆2n −1 . Since we will compute nondegenerate intersections of Γis , these kinds of subsets
10
are irrelevant. The second type consists of subsets of the parameter space whose points map
to tensors of rank one. The next proposition justifies the irrelevance of these subsets.
Proposition 13. The intersection of all Γis for i = 1, . . . , n and s = 1, 2 contains all tensors
of rank one.
Proof. Every tensor in ∆2n −1 of rank one is the image of a parameter vector in Θ where
λ1 = 0. Such a parameter vector is in Θλ1 λ2 . By Proposition 12, the image of Θλ1 λ2 under
the parametrization map is contained in every Γis .
In Corollary 22 we will prove that intersection of all nondegenerate Γis for i = 1, . . . , n and
s = 1, 2 is equal to the set of tensors of rank one. This intersection will give us the unique
n-dimensional stratum (type (5)). Hence, when we are intersecting preimages of Γis we will
ignore this second type of subsets since they are in every possible intersection. In summary,
when we refer to intersections of φ−1
n (Γis ) we will consider only the relevant part, meaning only
those points that are not the two types of irrelevant points. For the rest of the paper, whenever
we refer to a subset of Θ being relevant, we will be removing those parameter vectors that
map to the degenerate part of the boundary of ∆2n −1 as well as those which map to rank-one
tensors. Notice that the relevant part of the singular set, say, Θ◦12 consists of parameter vectors
with m-rank (2, 2, 1, 1, . . . , 1). However, to not make the notation further complicated, we will
refer to the relevant part of these singular sets by Θ◦ij as well. For instance, by Proposition
S
(i)
(i)
◦
12 the relevant part of φ−1
n (Γis ) consists of {a1s = 0} ∪ {a2s = 0} ∪ k6=i Θik .
−1
Lemma 14. The relevant part of φ−1
n (Γis ) ∩ φn (Γjt ) where i 6= j is
[ (i)
[
(i)
(j)
(j)
{a1s = 0} ∩ {a1t = 0}
{a2s = 0} ∩ {a2t = 0}
Θ◦ij .
(i)
(j)
Proof. The points in the set {a1s = 0} ∩ {a2t = 0} map to degenerate tensors since in the
marginalization of the image tensor P{i,j} (Xi = s, Xj = t) = 0. A similar argument shows
(i)
(j)
that {a2s = 0} ∩ {a1t = 0} is irrelevant. So we just need to compute the intersection of
∪k6=i Θ◦ik and ∪k̄6=j Θ◦j k̄ . When k = j and k̄ = i, we get Θ◦ij . Also, Θ◦ij ∩ Θj k̄ = Θ◦j when k̄ 6= i,
and Θ◦ik ∩ Θji = Θ◦i when k 6= j. Both are irrelevant. For the case k 6= j and k̄ 6= i, we either
get Θ1 if k 6= k̄, or Θ◦k if k = k̄. Again both cases give irrelevant subsets.
Corollary 15. The nondegenerate
intersection of Γis with Γjt where i 6= j is a stratum of
n
dimension 2n − 1. There are 2 4 such strata.
S
(i)
(j)
Proof. The parametrization map φn is generically smooth on u=1,2 {aus = 0} ∩ {aut = 0},
and a simple parameter count shows that this set has dimension equal to 2n − 1. Together
with Lemma 7 this implies the result. For each
1 ≤ i < j ≤ n and each choice of s, t ∈ {1, 2}
we get such a stratum. Hence, there are n2 4 of them.
−1
Lemma 16. The relevant part of φ−1
n (Γi1 ) ∩ φn (Γi2 ) is
[ (i)
[
(i)
(i)
(i)
{a11 = 0} ∩ {a22 = 0} {a12 = 0} ∩ {a21 = 0} ∪k6=i Θ◦ik .
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
Proof. The intersections {a11 = 0} ∩ {a12 = 0} and {a21 = 0} ∩ {a22 = 0} are empty in the
parameter space Θ.
Corollary 17. The nondegenerate intersection Γi1 ∩ Γi2 is a stratum of dimension 2n − 1.
There are n such exceptional strata.
11
(i)
(i)
Proof. The parametrization map φn is generically smooth on {a11 = 0} ∩ {a22 = 0}, and on
(i)
(i)
{a12 = 0} ∩ {a21 = 0}, and the dimension of this set is 2n − 1. Together with Lemma 7 this
gives the first statement. The count is obvious.
−1
−1
Lemma 18. The relevant part of φ−1
n (Γis ) ∩ φn (Γjt ) ∩ φn (Γkv ) where i, j, k are distinct is
[
(j)
(i)
{aus
= 0} ∩ {aut = 0} ∩ {a(k)
uv = 0}.
u=1,2
Proof. We proceed as in the proof Lemma 14. After discarding irrelevant subsets such as
(i)
(j)
(k)
{a1s = 0} ∩ {a1t = 0} ∩ {a2v = 0} (since they map to degenerate tensors) we also see that
the desired intersection contains Θ◦ij ∩ Θ◦ik ∩ Θ◦jk = Θ1 . This is also irrelevant.
Corollary 19. Let I ⊂ {1, . . . , n} where
T |I| = ℓ ≥ 3. Then for each choice of si ∈ {1, 2} for
i ∈ I the nondegenerate intersection i∈I Γisi is a stratum of dimension 2n + 1 − ℓ. There
are nℓ 2ℓ such strata.
T
Proof. Lemma 18 implies that the relevant part of i∈I φ−1
n (Γisi ) is
[
\
{a(i)
usi = 0} .
u=1,2
si :i∈I
Each piece of this union
T has dimension 2n + 1 − ℓ, and since φn is generically smooth on these
sets the intersection i∈I Γisi is a stratum of the same dimension. One more time it is easy
to count such strata.
−1
−1
◦
Lemma 20. The relevant part of φ−1
n (Γi1 ) ∩ φn (Γi2 ) ∩ φn (Γj1 ) is Θij . Moreover, this is
−1
−1
−1
equal to the relevant part of φ−1
n (Γi1 ) ∩ φn (Γi2 ) ∩ φn (Γj1 ) ∩ φn (Γj2 ).
−1
Proof. We have computed φ−1
n (Γi1 ) ∩ φn (Γi2 ) in Lemma 16. Together with Proposition 12
we conclude that we need to describe the intersection of
[ (i)
[
(i)
(i)
(i)
{a11 = 0} ∩ {a22 = 0} {a12 = 0} ∩ {a21 = 0} ∪k6=i Θ◦ik
with
(j)
(j)
{a11 = 0} ∪ {a21 = 0}
[
∪k6=j Θ◦jk .
(i)
(i)
(j)
Up to symmetry, we get the following intersections: (i) {a12 = 0, a21 = 0, a11 = 0}, (ii)
Θ◦ij . It is therefore enough to show that the first set is irrelevant. Let P be a tensor that
is in the image of a point in the set (i). Then in the marginal distribution P{i,j} we have
P{i,j} (Xi = 1, Xj = 1) = 0. Hence P is degenerate. Finally, when we intersect further with
S
(j)
(j)
◦
φ−1
n (Γj2 ) = {a12 = 0} ∪ {a22 = 0} ∪ k6=j Θjk , still the only thing that survives as relevant
◦
is Θij .
Corollary 21. For i 6= j, the nondegenerate
intersection of Γi1 ∩ Γi2 ∩ Γj1 ∩ Γj2 is a stratum
n
of dimension n + 1. There are 2 such strata.
Proof. The nondegenerate intersection given in the statement is the image of Θ◦ij by Lemma
20. This intersection is not contained in any other Γk1 or Γk2 for k 6= i, j since by Proposition
12 everything in Θ◦ij ∩φ−1
n (Γk1 ) maps to tensors of rank one. Hence, indeed Γi1 ∩Γi2 ∩Γj1 ∩Γj2
defines a stratum.
Lemma
7 implies that the dimension of this stratum is n + 1. Clearly,
there are n2 such strata.
12
Corollary 22. The intersection of all nondegenerate Γis for i = 1, . . . , n and s = 1, 2 is the
unique stratum of dimension n consisting of all tensors of rank one.
Proof. Proposition 13 says that
T the intersection contains the set of tensors of rank one. Corollary 21 implies that already s=1,2 (Γis ∩ Γjs ∩ Γks ) is contained in the set of tensors of rank
one. This shows that indeed the intersection of all codimension one strata is a stratum. The
dimension of the set of all tensors of rank one is n.
Finally we are in a position to prove our main theorem.
Proof of Theorem 9: Proposition 5 implies that the interior of Mn has dimension 2n + 1. The
(i)
(i)
above results imply that any parameter vector with a1s = 0 or a2s = 0 for s = 1, 2 maps to
◦
the boundary of Mn . Similarly, any parameter vector in Θij for 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n as well as
a parameter vector in Θλ1 λ2 is mapped to the boundary of Mn . The remaining parameter
vectors must map to the interior of Mn , and these points are nonsingular parameter vectors
that are in the interior of Θ. We will associate the interior of Mn with the interior of the
n-dimensional cube Cn .
Proposition 5 also implies that Γis for i = 1, . . . , n and s = 1, 2 are precisely 2n boundary
strata of dimension 2n. They are in bijection with the 2n facets of Cn . By Proposition 12,
S
S
(i)
(i)
the preimage of each Γis is {a1s = 0} ∪ {a2s = 0} Θλ1 λ2 ∪k6=i Θ◦ik . An argument that can
be found in the proof of Lemma 4.5 in [2] shows that points in Γis can be obtained as images
(i)
(i)
of points in {a1s = 0} ∪ {a2s = 0} only. Lemma 14 proves that Γis ∩ Γjt for i 6= j is the
S (i)
S ◦
(i)
(j)
(j)
image of points in {a1s = 0} ∩ {a1t = 0} {a2s = 0} ∩ {a2t = 0}
Θij . By Corollary 15
this is the non-exceptional strata of dimension k = 2n − 1 and they correspond to n − 2
dimensional faces of Cn which are obtained as intersections of nonparallel facets of the cube
(i.e. i 6= j). Lemma 18 and Corollary 19
take care of the non-exceptional
strata of dimension
T
S
(i)
n < k < 2n − 1 as the image of u=1,2
si :i∈I {ausi = 0} . This image is the intersection of
T
i∈I Γisi where |I| = 2n + 1 − k. They correspond to faces of Cn of dimension k − n − 1. This
gives us all nondegenerate strata accounted by (1) and (2) in the statement of the theorem.
The exceptional strata of codimension two (k = 2n − 1) in (3) is dealt with in Lemma
16 and Corollary 17 together with the proof of Lemma 4.5 in [2]. The statement about the
exceptional strata of dimension k = n + 1 in (4) follows from Lemma 20 and Corollary 21.
And finally, the proof of Lemma 20 and Corollary 22 provide the description of the unique
n-dimensional stratum in (5).
In the next section we present how our understanding of the boundary of Mn provides
a partial understanding of the maximum likelihood estimation over this model class. In the
special case of M3 we were able to solve this problem exactly.
4. Maximum likelihood estimation over Mn
Suppose an independent sample of size N > 1 was observed from a binary distribution.
We report the data in a tensor of counts U = (ui1 ···in ) where ui1 ···in is the number of times
the event {X1 = i1 , . . . , Xn = in } was observed. The sum of all elements in U is equal to N .
The log-likelihood function ℓ : Θ −→ R is
(5)
ℓ(θ) =
2
X
ui1 ···in log(pi1 ···in (θ)),
i1 ,...,in =1
13
where pi1 ···in (θ) is as in (1). In this section we are interested in maximizing the log-likelihood
function over Mn to compute a maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) for the data U . We
remark that ℓ(θ) is a strictly concave function on the entire ∆2n −1 , and if its unique maximizer
over the entire probability simplex is not in Mn , then its maximizer over Mn , i.e. the MLE,
must be on the boundary of Mn .
In our analysis of the boundary strata we restricted ourselves to the nondegenerate part
of ∆2n −1 . The lemma below ensures that by looking at the data U we can detect when the
MLE is going to lie in this nondegenerate part, and so, when we can apply Theorem 9. It
implies that if the sample proportions tensor Q = N1 U lies outside the degenerate part of
∆2n −1 , then the MLE P̂ over Mn will also be nondegenerate.
Lemma 23. Let M be a model in ∆k−1 for some k ≥ 1 and let Q = N1 U be the sample
proportions for data U . Then if the MLE P̂ for U exists, the support of Q is contained in the
support of P̂ .
Proof. The MLE is the constrained maximizer over M of the log-likelihood
k
X
i=1
X
ui log Pi =
ui log Pi .
i∈supp(Q)
It is equal to −∞ at all points P with Pi = 0 for some i ∈ supp(Q).
4.1. General results. In order to solve the optimization problem for the log-likelihood (5),
one can compute all critical points of ℓ(θ) over the interior and all boundary strata of Mn .
For many parametrized statistical models the equations defining these critical points are just
rational functions in the parameter vector θ. This is the case for the latent class models
that we study in this paper. We will call the number of complex critical points of ℓ(θ)
over a model for generic data U the maximum likelihood degree (ML-degree) of that model.
The ML-degree for general algebraic statistical models were introduced in [6] and [18]. In
particular, it was shown that the ML-degree of such a model is a stable number. We will use
the ML-degrees of the boundary strata of Mn as an indication for the complexity of solving
the maximum likelihood estimation problem. For instance, if the ML-degree is ≤ 4, then
one can express the MLE with closed form formulas as a function of U . In particular, if the
ML-degree is equal to one, then the MLE can be expressed as a rational function of U .
In order to solve the constrained optimization problem of maximizing the likelihood function, one can employ the following simple scheme:
(a) For each stratum S of Mn list the critical points of the log-likelihood function constrained to its closure S.
(b) Pick the best point from the list of those critical points that lie in Mn .
Our first observation for this procedure is that we never need to check all the strata to find
the global maximum. For this consider the poset of the boundary stratification as described
in the previous section. In our search for the global maximum we will start from the maximal
element of the poset and move recursively down. If a global maximum over the closure S lies
in the stratum S, there is no need to optimize over any stratum S ′ S. As we will see below,
indeed for many strata the MLE is guaranteed to lie in Mn .
Our second observation is that maximizing the log-likelihood over most of the strata is
challenging. The defining constraints correspond to complicated context specific independence constraints [5], and there is yet no general theory on how to optimize over these models
14
exactly. However, there are several exceptions. They are the strata we considered in Section 3. Before we go through them we introduce notation that will be used below: For the
(r,s)
data tensor U = (ui1 ···in ) denote by U (r,s) = (uij ) the matrix whose (i, j)-th entry is the
(r)
count of the event {Xr = i, Xs = j} and by U (r) = (ui ) the vector whose entries are the
counts of the event {Xr = i}.
(a) Codimension one strata. Each tensor on one of these 2n strata corresponds to a context
specific independence model, such as where X2 , . . . , Xn are independent conditionally on
{X1 = 1}. The ML-degree of the corresponding conditional model is one; hence, the MLE is
expressed as a rational function of the data:
(12) (13)
p̂1j2 ···ji ···jn =
(1n)
u1j2 u1j3 · · · u1jn
(1) n−2
.
N u1
After normalization, the other slice is a tensor from the model Mn−1 . Therefore p̂2j2 ···ji ···jn
can be computed by employing any procedure that can be used for Mn−1 . For instance,
in the next section we will get a closed form formula for the maximizer on each boundary
stratum of M3 . Hence, in the case of M4 all codimension one strata will also have closed
form formulas.
(b) The exceptional codimension two strata (type (3)). As we noted in Section 3, these strata
correspond to simple graphical models over graphs like in Figure 2. The ML-degree of this
model is one; hence, the MLE is expressed as a rational function of the data (also see [22,
Section 4.4.2]):
(12) (13)
p̂j1 j2 ···ji ···jn =
(1n)
uj1 j2 uj1 j3 · · · uj1 jn
(1) n−2
.
N uj1
This point is always guaranteed to lie in Mn and so we never have to check strata
that lie
n
below that in the Hasse diagram defined in the previous section. These are the 2 strata of
type (4) and the type (5) stratum. Nevertheless, optimizing over these special strata is simple
so we describe it next.
(c) The n + 1 dimensional strata of type(4). These strata correspond to graphical models with
one edge and n − 2 disconnected nodes. The ML-degree of this model is one. For example, if
1 and 2 are connected by an edge and all other nodes are disconnected, the MLE is
p̂j1 j2 j3 ···jn =
1
(12) (3)
(n)
u u · · · uj n .
N n−1 j1 j2 j3
(d) The n dimensional stratum of type(5). This stratum corresponds to the full-independence
model and has ML-degree one. The MLE over this stratum is simply
p̂j1j2 ···ji ···jn =
1 (1) (2)
(n)
u u · · · uj n .
N n j1 j2
There is one exceptional case, n = 3, when all strata are defined by binomial equations, in
which case the closure of each strata corresponds to a log-linear model. The MLE is therefore
uniquely given and can be easily computed. We discuss this in more detail in the following
subsection.
15
4.2. Maximum Likelihood Estimation for M3 . The binary latent class model for three
observed variables in the probability simplex ∆7 is parametrized by
pijk = λ1 a1i b1j c1k + λ2 a2i b2j c2k
where
a11 a12
b11 b12
c11 c12
A=
B=
C=
,
a21 a22
b21 b22
c21 c22
are stochastic matrices. We will depict the resulting tensor P as
a11 b11 c11 a11 b11 c12 a12 b11 c11 a12 b11 c12
a21 b21 c21 a21 b21 c22 a22 b21 c21 a22 b21 c22
λ1
+λ2
a11 b12 c11 a11 b12 c12 a12 b12 c11 a12 b12 c12
a21 b22 c21 a21 b22 c22 a22 b22 c21 a22 b22 c22
M3 has dimension 7 and it has the following stratification, c.f. Figure 3.
P
1. The interior of M3 has dimension 7. Its Zariski closure is the linear space {p :
pijk = 1}.
Its ML-degree is one and the MLE is computed by
uijk
i, j, k = 1, 2
p̂ijk =
u+++
2. There are six 6-dimensional strata. Each is obtained as the image of those matrices where
one entry in the first row of A, B, or C is set to 0, such as a11 = 0. The resulting tensor is
of the form
0 0 b11 c11 b11 c12
a21 b21 c21 a21 b21 c22 a22 b21 c21 a22 b21 c22
λ1
+ λ2
0 0 b12 c11 b12 c12
a21 b22 c21 a21 b22 c22 a22 b22 c21 a22 b22 c22
Hence its first slice is a rank one matrix whereas its second slice is generically
P a rank two
matrix. The Zariski closure is defined by p111 p122 − p112 p121 (together with
pijk − 1) and
forms a log-linear model. From the statistical point of view this stratum corresponds to the
context specific independence model, where X2 is independent of X3 given {X1 = 1}. Its
ML-degree is one and the MLE is computed by
u2jk
u1j+ · u1+k
,
p̂2jk =
j, k = 1, 2
p̂1jk =
u1++ · u+++
u+++
There are two kinds of boundary strata of dimension 5.
3a. There are 12 of the first kind. Each is obtained as the image of two types of parameters.
The first type comes from parameters where from two matrices one entry in the first row of
each is zero. The canonical example is a11 = 0 and b11 = 0. The resulting tensor is of the
form
a21 b21 c21 a21 b21 c22 a22 b21 c21 a22 b21 c22
0
0 0 0
+ λ2
λ1
a21 b22 c21 a21 b22 c22 a22 b22 c21 a22 b22 c22
0 0 c11 c12
The second type comes from parameters where one of the matrices has rank one. The corresponding example for the above canonical example is when rank(C) = 1, in which case,
c11 = c21 = c and c12 = c22 = c̄, since C is a stochastic matrix. The resulting tensor is of the
form
a21 b21 c a21 b21 c̄ a22 b21 c a22 b21 c̄
a11 b11 c a11 b11 c̄ a12 b11 c a12 b11 c̄
+ λ2
λ1
a11 b12 c a11 b12 c̄ a12 b12 c a12 b12 c̄
a21 b22 c a21 b22 c̄ a22 b22 c a22 b22 c̄
Two (overlapping)
tensors are
slices of both
of these
rank one matrices, namely, the slices
p111 p112
p111 p112
corresponding to
and
. The Zariski closure is defined by the
p121 p122
p211 p212
16
p111 p121 p211
2-minors of
, and it corresponds to two context specific independence
p112 p122 p212
constraints. Its ML-degree is one and the MLE is computed by
p̂ijk =
uij+ · (u++k − u22k )
(u+++ − u221 − u222 ) · u+++
ijk 6= 221, 222
p̂22k =
u22k
u+++
k = 1, 2
3b. There are three of the second kind. Each is also obtained as the image of two types of
parameters. The first type comes from parameters where one of the matrices A, B, C is the
identity matrix. The canonical example is a12 = 0 and a21 = 0. The resulting tensor is of the
form
0 0 b21 c21 b21 c22
b11 c11 b11 c12 0 0
+ λ2
λ1
0 0 b22 c21 b22 c22
b12 c11 b12 c12 0 0
The second type comes from parameters where one of the matrices has rank one. The corresponding example for the above canonical example is when rank(C) = 1 or rank(B) = 1.
In the case of rank(C) = 1 we obtain the tensor as the second tensor in 3a. Two parallel
are each rank one matrices, namely, the slices corresponding to
slices of these
tensors
p111 p112
p211 p212
and
. The Zariski closure is defined by p111 p122 − p112 p121 and
p121 p122
p212 p222
p211 p222 − p212 p221 , and it corresponds to conditional independence of X2 and X3 given X1 .
As indicated in the end of Section 3, the ML degree is one and the MLE is computed by
p̂ijk =
uij+ · ui+k
ui++ · u+++
i, j, k = 1, 2
4a. There are 8 four-dimensional strata of type (2). They are defined by the image of
matrices where one entry from the first row of each matrix is zero. The canonical example is
a11 = b11 = c11 = 0. The resulting tensor is of the form
a21 b21 c21 a21 b21 c22 a22 b21 c21 a22 b21 c22
0 0 0 0
+ λ2
λ1
a21 b22 c21 a21 b22 c22 a22 b22 c21 a22 b22 c22
0 0 0 1
The Zariski closure is also a log-linear
1
0
0
A=
1
0
0
model whose design matrix A can be chosen to be
1 0 0 0 0 −1 0
0 1 1 0 0
1 0
0 0 0 1 1
1 0
0 1 0 1 0
1 0
1 0 1 0 1
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1
where the columns correspond to p111 , p112 , p121 , p122 , p211 , p212 , p221 , p222 . The defining equations are given by the ideal
p111 p121
p111 p121 p211
I2
+ I2 p112 p122
p112 p122 p212
p211 p221
which is minimally generated by five quadrics. The ML-degree is two and the MLE is com222
. Then
puted by choosing one of the two solutions obtained as follows. First p̂222 = uu+++
17
let
u111 + u112 − u221
u+++
u121 + u122 + u221
B=
u+++
u211 + u212 + u221
C=
u+++
u111 + u121 + u211 + u221
D=
u+++
A=
Then for each root p̂221 of
Dp2221 − [(A + C)(A + B) + D(C + B)]p221 + BCD = 0
compute
p̂212
p̂211
p̂122
p̂121
p̂111
p̂112
D
CD
=
p̂221 + C −
A+C
A+C
= −p̂212 − p̂221 + C
BD
D
p̂221 + B −
=
A+B
A+B
= −p̂122 − p̂221 + B
= −p̂121 − p̂211 − p̂221 + D
= −p̂111 + p̂221 + A
Note that the computations should be done in the exact order given above.
4b. There are three four dimensional strata of type (4). They are obtained by letting one
of the matrices A, B, C to have rank one. A canonical example is where a21 = a11 = a,
a22 = a12 = ā. The resulting tensor is of the form
ab21 c21 ab21 c22 āb21 c21 āb21 c22
ab11 c11 ab11 c12 āb11 c11 āb11 c12
+ λ2
λ1
ab12 c11 ab12 c12 āb12 c11 āb12 c12
ab22 c21 ab22 c22 āb22 c21 āb22 c22
As indicated in the end of Section 3, the ML degree is one and the MLE is computed by
uij+ · u++k
p̂ijk =
u2+++
5. There is one stratum of dimension three formed by rank one tensors, also known as the
independence model on three binary random variables. This is a toric model and has ML
degree one where the ML estimate is computed by
ui++ · u+j+ · u++k
p̂ijk =
u3+++
4.3. Simulations. The exact maximum likelihood estimation for M3 gives us a valuable
insight into the geometry of the likelihood function for the latent class models. In this subsection we report on simulations that were designed to unearth this geometry.
18
(a) We say that a point P ∈ ∆7 lies in the attraction basin of a stratum S, if, given that
the sample proportions tensor is P , the global maximum of the likelihood function lies in S.
In our first simulation we approximate the relative volumes of the attraction basins of each
stratum. Attraction basins for strata of type (4) and (5) are lower dimensional and so have
volume zero.
We run 106 iterations, each time sampling P uniformly from ∆7 and then sampling data
of size N = 1000 from P . We use the resulting data tensor to find the MLE. Table 1 reports
our findings. In 8.38% of cases, the MLE lies in the interior of M3 . Quite interestingly,
the fifteen 5-dimensional strata attract almost 50% of the points. In particular, the three
special strata of type (3) attract 17.29% of the points so each of them attracts approximately
6%. This is not far from how much the interior attracts, and virtually same as any of the
codimension one strata. Because we are trying to estimate the attraction basin volumes, we
omitted strata of type (4) and (5) in the table. However, despite the fact that for a given
sample size (especially if small) there may be a positive probability of the MLE lying on this
strata, this did not happen in simulations that led to Table 1.
Table 1
Relative volume of MLE attraction basins of strata in M3 ; for data uniformly
distributed over ∆7 .
1× 7-dim 6× 6-dim 12× 5a-dim 3× 5b-dim 8× 4a-dim
8.38
36.24
29.75
17.29
8.34
The fact that codimension two strata attract more points than the interior and the codimension one strata together may be a bit counterintuitive at first, but follows directly from
the geometry of the model. The log-likelihood function is a strictly concave function over
∆7 with the unique maximum given by the sample proportions. Its level sets are convex and
centered around the sample proportions Q = N1 U . On the other hand, M3 is highly concave,
as illustrated by its 3-dimensional linear section in Figure 1 of [2]. It is then natural to expect
that lower-dimensional strata have higher probability of containing the global maximum as
long as the sample proportions lie outside of M3 . In the next simulation, we argue that this
is not a desirable feature of the latent class model.
(b) Suppose that the true data generating distribution lies in M3 and the corresponding
parameters are λ1 = λ2 = 21 and
1−ǫ
ǫ
A=B=C=
for ǫ ∈ (0, 0.5].
ǫ
1−ǫ
If ǫ is small, all variables are closely correlated with the unobserved variable. On the other
extreme, if ǫ = 0.5, all variables are independent of the unobserved variable. We generate
N samples from the given distribution with a fixed ǫ and compute the MLE, repeating this
10,000 times. We start with N = 1000 which is a large number for such a small contingency
table. In Table 2 we see that for ǫ close to 0.5 the probability of the MLE landing in the
interior of M3 is small despite the fact that the data generating distribution lies in the model
and that N is very large. This means that, even when the data generating distribution lies in
the model, with high probability we can expect estimates with zeros. This obviously becomes
more dramatic for smaller values of N = 100 and N = 50, see Table 3 and Table 4 respectively.
In the last case, even for small values of ǫ, there is a high probability of hitting the boundary.
19
This shows that the latent class models must be used with caution, especially if correlations
between variables are small and the sample size is relatively small. Finally, we note that in
producing the last row of Table 4 we observed some MLEs on the 3-dimensional strata of rank
one tensors. Because these MLEs are also MLEs over the strata 5b, we report them there.
Table 2
Relative volume of MLE attraction basins of strata in M3 ; for the special generating
distributions given by ǫ. Sample size N = 1000, number of iterations 10000.
ǫ 1× 7-dim 6× 6-dim 12× 5a-dim 3× 5b-dim 8× 4a-dim
0.5
12.02
47.59
22.09
13.06
5.24
0.4
34.52
43.87
12.13
7.94
1.54
0.3
99.32
0.67
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.2
100
0
0
0
0
0.1
100
0
0
0
0
Table 3
Same as in Table 2 but with sample size N = 100.
ǫ 1× 7-dim 6× 6-dim 12× 5a-dim 3× 5b-dim 8× 4a-dim
0.5
10.72
45.97
22.92
14.35
6.04
0.4
12.15
46.07
21.29
15.27
5.22
0.3
38.00
43.62
10.84
6.36
1.18
0.2
80.53
17.92
1.60
0.32
0.03
0.1
90.02
9.54
0.3
0.13
0.01
Table 4
Same as in Table 2 but with sample size N = 50.
ǫ 1× 7-dim 6× 6-dim 12× 5a-dim 3× 5b-dim 8× 4a-dim
0.5
10.52
45.74
23.33
14.3
6.06
0.4
10.83
45.24
23.36
14.67
5.90
0.3
21.59
47.16
17.11
11.49
2.65
0.2
51.84
38.72
5.87
3.25
0.32
0.1
48.59
39.37
8.33
2.42
1.29
5. EM fixed point ideals
A common algorithm for finding the maximum likelihood estimate for latent class models
is the EM algorithm [8]. However, it does not come with a guarantee for converging to the
global optimum of the likelihood function. In this section, we study an object, the EM fixed
point ideal introduced in [21], that eliminates this drawback as we will explain now. An EM
fixed point for an observed data tensor U is a parameter vector in Θ which stays fixed after
one iteration of the EM algorithm. The EM fixed points are precisely the candidates for the
global maxima of the likelihood function; see Lemma 24. The solution set of the EM fixed
point ideal contains all the EM fixed points, and in particular all the global maxima of the
likelihood function. Once one finds all the solutions of the EM fixed ideal, then one has also
found all the global maxima of the likelihood function. Moreover, for a given model M, the
20
EM fixed point ideal consists of the equations defining all EM fixed points for any data tensor
U . Hence, for M it has to be computed and investigated once and for all.
In this section, after describing the equations of the EM fixed point ideal for M3 in Proposition 25, we will present the full prime decomposition of this ideal in Theorem 26. Then we
will illustrate two important uses of this decomposition. First, we will show that using these
components one can recover the formulas for the maximum likelihood estimator for various
strata that we presented in Section 4.2. Those formulas were obtained by painstaking work
and attention, whereas an automatic elimination process performed by a computer algebra
system could compute them provided that the decomposition of the EM fixed point ideal is
computed. Second, we will point out that the relevant components of this decomposition
which contain stochastic parameter matrices correspond precisely to the boundary strata of
M3 , also reported in Section 4.2. This hints at the usefulness of the EM fixed point ideal
for the discovery of such boundary strata. In fact, we will showcase this discovery process
in Section 6.1 by computing the decomposition of the EM fixed point ideal of M3,3 . The
components we get give the boundary stratification of M3,3 as reported in [27].
We present a version of the EM algorithm adapted to latent class models with three observed variables in Algorithm 1. We no longer assume that the observed or hidden variables
are binary. We let X1 , X2 , X3 be the observed random variables with d1 , d2 , d3 states, respectively, and we assume that the hidden variable takes values in {1, . . . , r}. We denote this
model by Md1 ×d2 ×d3 ,r . Our presentation is based on [26, Section 1.3] and [21, Algorithm 1].
Input: Observed data tensor U ∈ Zd1 ×d2 ×d3 .
Output: A proposed maximum P̂ ∈ ∆d1 d2 d3 −1 of the log-likelihood function ℓ on the
model Md1 ×d2 ×d3 ,r .
Step 0: Initialize randomly (λ1 , . . . , λr ) ∈ ∆r−1 , (ai1 , . . . , aid1 ) ∈ ∆d1 −1 ,
(bi1 , . . . , bid2 ) ∈ ∆d2 −1 , and (ci1 , . . . , cid3 ) ∈ ∆d3 −1 for i = 1, . . . , r.
Run the E-step and M-step until the entries of P ∈ ∆d1 d2 d3 −1 converge.
E-Step: Estimate the hidden data:
λa b c
Set vlijk := Pr l λlil aljli blklj clk uijk for l = 1, . . . , r, i = 1, . . . , d1 , j = 1, . . . , d2 , and
l=1
k = 1, . . . , d3 .
M-Step: Maximize the log-likelihood function of the model with complete data using the
estimates for the hidden data from the E-step:
P 1 Pd2 Pd3
Set λl := di=1
i=1 vijkl /u+++ for l = 1, ..., r.
Pd2 Pi=1
d3
Set ali := j=1 k=1 vijkl /(u+++ λl ) for l = 1, . . . , r, i = 1, . . . , d1 .
P 1 Pd3
vijkl /(u+++ λl ) for l = 1, . . . , r, j = 1, . . . , d2 .
Set blj := di=1
Pd1 Pk=1
d2
Set clk := i=1 j=1 vijkl /(u+++ λl ) for l = 1, . . . , r, k = 1, . . . , d3 .
Update the joint distribution
for the latent class model:
P
Set pijk := rl=1 λl ali blj clk for i = 1, . . . , d1 , j = 1, . . . , d2 , k = 1, . . . , d3 .
Return P .
Algorithm 1: EM algorithm for the latent class model with three observed variables
An EM fixed point for an observed data tensor U is an element of Θ := ∆r−1 × (∆d1 −1 )r ×
(∆d2 −1 )r × (∆d3 −1 )r which stays fixed after one E-step and M-step of the EM-algorithm with
the input U .
Lemma 24. An element of Θ to which the EM-algorithm can converge to for some random
starting point is an EM fixed point.
21
Proof. Denote the function defined by one step of the EM-algorithm by EM . Pick an initial
point (λ(0) , A(0) , B (0) , C (0) ) ∈ Θ. Let
(6)
(λ(k+1) , A(k+1) , B (k+1) , C (k+1) ) = EM (λ(k) , A(k) , B (k) , C (k) ).
Assume that limk→∞ (λ(k) , A(k) , B (k) , C (k) ) exists and the limit is (λ, A, B, C). Then taking
the limit of both sides of (6) gives
lim (λ(k+1) , A(k+1) , B (k+1) , C (k+1) ) = lim EM (λ(k) , A(k) , B (k) , C (k) ).
k→∞
k→∞
Since EM is a continuous function, on the right hand side, we can bring the limit inside:
lim (λ(k+1) , A(k+1) , B (k+1) , C (k+1) ) = EM ( lim (λ(k) , A(k) , B (k) , C (k) )).
k→∞
k→∞
Hence (λ, A, B, C) = EM (λ, A, B, C).
Lemma 24 justifies the study of the set of the EM fixed points as they contain the approximate outputs of the EM algorithm. In [21, Section 3], the set of all EM fixed points of a
latent class model with two observed variables is studied through the minimal set of polynomial equations that they satisfy. These equations are called the EM fixed point equations and
they define the EM fixed point ideal. Here we study the EM fixed point ideal for M3 .
Proposition 25. The EM fixed point equations for 2 × 2 × 2-tensors of rank+ ≤ 2 on the
parameter space Θ are
2
X
aℓi
rijk bℓj cℓk = 0
for all ℓ, i = 1, 2,
j,k=1
bℓj
2
X
i,k=1
cℓk
h
where [rijk ] = u+++ −
2
X
i,j=1
uijk
pijk
i
.
rijk aℓi cℓk = 0
for all
ℓ, j = 1, 2,
rijk aℓi bℓj = 0
for all
ℓ, k = 1, 2,
Proof. This proof follows the proof of [21, Theorem 3.5]. Elements of Θ that stay fixed after
one E-step and M-step are characterized by the rational equations
λℓ =
aℓi =
bℓj =
cℓk =
1
u+++
1
2
X
λℓ aℓi bℓj cℓk
· uijk
P2
λ
a
b
c
s
si
sj
sk
s=1
i,j,k=1
u+++ λℓ
1
u+++ λℓ
1
u+++ λℓ
2
X
λℓ aℓi bℓj cℓk
· uijk
P2
λ
a
b
c
s
si
sj
sk
s=1
j,k=1
2
X
λℓ aℓi bℓj cℓk
· uijk
P2
λ
a
b
c
s
si
sj
sk
s=1
i,k=1
2
X
λℓ aℓi bℓj cℓk
· uijk
P2
λ
a
b
c
s
si
sj
sk
s=1
i,j=1
22
for ℓ = 1, 2,
for ℓ, i = 1, 2,
for ℓ, j = 1, 2,
for ℓ, k = 1, 2.
Assuming that the observed data tensor U and the starting parameters are positive, then λl
will always stay positive, because al , bl , cl being stochastic vectors implies that there is always
one non-zero summand in the equation for λl . This allows us to cancel out λl from other
equations. After this cancellation, the first equation follows from any of the other equations.
We can further modify these equations:
aℓi =
1
u+++
aℓi u+++ =
2
X
j,k=1
2
X
j,k=1
aℓi u+++
aℓi
2
X
j,k=1
2
X
2
X
aℓi bℓj cℓk
P2
aℓi bℓj cℓk
P2
aℓi bℓj cℓk
s=1 λs asi bsj csk
s=1 λs asi bsj csk
· uijk =⇒
· uijk =⇒
· uijk =⇒
λ
a
b
c
s
si
sj
sk
s=1
j,k=1
j,k=1
!
uijk
u+++ − P2
· bℓj cℓk = 0 =⇒
s=1 λs asi bsj csk
2
X
u
ijk
· bℓj cℓk = 0, for ℓ, i = 1, 2.
aℓi
u+++ −
pijk
bℓj cℓk =
P2
j,k=1
P2
The third line follows from j,k=1 bℓj cℓk = 1 and the last line follows from pijk =
Applying similar arguments for the equations for blj and clk and setting
uijk
rijk = u+++ −
,
pijk
gives the desired equations.
P2
ℓ=1 λℓ aℓi bℓj cℓk .
We call the ideal generated by the equations in Proposition 25 the EM fixed point ideal and
denote it by F. This ideal is not prime and it defines a reducible variety.
A minimal prime of
P2
F is called relevant if it contains none of the 8 polynomials pijk = ℓ=1 aℓi bℓj cℓk and none of
the six ideals hal1 , al2 i, hbl1 , bl2 i and hcl1 , cl2 i. Equivalently, an ideal is relevant, if not all its
solutions have a coordinate of P identically zero and after normalizing the parameters come
from stochastic matrices.
Theorem 26. The radical of the EM fixed point ideal F for M3 has precisely 63 relevant
primes consisting of 9 orbital classes.
Proof. This proof follows the proof of [21, Theorem 5.5] in using the approach of cellular
components from [9]. The EM fixed point ideal F is given by
* 2
+
2
2
X
X
X
aℓi
rijk bℓj cℓk , bℓj
rijk aℓi cℓk , cℓk
rijk aℓi bℓj : i, j, k, l = 1, 2 .
j,k=1
i,j=1
i,k=1
P2
Any prime ideal containing F contains either aℓi or j,k=1 rijk bℓj cℓk for ℓ, i ∈ {1, 2}, and
P
P
either bℓj or 2i,k=1 rijk aℓi cℓk for ℓ, j ∈ {1, 2}, and either cℓk or 2i,j=1 rijk aℓi bℓj for ℓ, k ∈
{1, 2}. We categorize all primes containing F according to the set S of parameters aℓi ,
bℓj , and cℓk contained in them. The symmetry group acts on the parameters by permuting
23
the rows of A, B, and C simultaneously, the columns of A, B, and C separately, and the
matrices A, B, and C themselves. For each orbit that consists of relevant ideals,
Q we pick one
representative S and compute the cellular component FS = ((F + hSi) : ( S c )∞ ), where
S c = {a11 , ...a22 , b11 , ..., b22 , c11 , ...c22 }\S. Next we remove all representatives S such that
FT ⊂ FS for a representative T in another orbit. For each remaining cellular component FS ,
we compute its minimal primes. In each case, we use either the Macaulay2 minimalPrimes
function or the linear elimination sequence from [12, Proposition 23(b)]. Finally, we remove
those minimal primes of FS that contain a cellular component FT for a set T (not necessarily
a representative) in another orbit. The remaining 9 minimal primes correspond to the rows of
Table 5 and are uniquely determined by their properties. These are the set S, the degree and
codimension, the ranks rA = rank(A), rB = rank(B), and rC = rank(C) at a generic point.
The 63 ideals are obtained when counting each orbit with its orbit size in the last column of
Table 5.
Table 5
Minimal primes of EM fixed point ideal F for 2 × 2 × 2-tensors of rank+ 2.
|S| a’s b’s c’s deg codim rA rB rC orbit
0
0
0
0
60
7
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
48
7
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
48
7
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
48
7
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
8
2
2
2
1
{a11 }
1
1
0
0
5
8
2
2
2
12
{a11 , a22 }
2
2
0
0
25
8
2
2
2
6
{a11 , b11 }
2
1
1
0
11
8
2
2
2
24
{a11 , b11 , c11 } 3
1
1
1
23
8
2
2
2
16
Class S
{∅}
The orbit sizes in Table 5 are twice the number of corresponding strata in Corollary 10,
except for the rows represented by {∅}. The reason for this is that in this table we consider
the ideal that is obtained by switching the rows of A, B and C different from the original
ideal.
The rows of Table 5 correspond to different boundary strata in Theorem 9. The row 1
corresponds to the unique 3-dimensional type (5) stratum that consists of rank-one tensors.
This can be seen by considering ranks of A, B and C that are all one. The rows 2–4 correspond
to the type (4) boundary strata, where exactly one Markov matrix A, B or C is of rank one.
The row 5 corresponds to the interior (type(1)).
The row 6 corresponds to a 6-dimensional type (2) stratum, where a11 = 0. The row 7
corresponds to a 5-dimensional type (3) stratum, where a11 = a22 = 0. The row 8 corresponds
to a 5-dimensional type (2) stratum, where a11 = b11 = 0. The row 9 corresponds to a 4dimensional type (2) stratum, where a11 = b11 = c11 = 0.
In the next example we will explain how to derive the EM fixed points and the potential
MLEs from the former type of minimal primes of the EM fixed point ideal.
24
Example 1. Consider the minimal prime of the EM fixed point ideal corresponding to a11 =
a22 = 0:
I1 =ha22 , a11 , r212 r221 − r211 r222 , c11 r221 + c12 r222 , b11 r212 + b12 r222 , c11 r211 + c12 r212 ,
b11 r211 + b12 r221 , r112 r121 − r111 r122 , c21 r121 + c22 r122 , b21 r112 + b22 r122 ,
c21 r111 + c22 r112 , b21 r111 + b22 r121 i.
We add to the ideal I1 the ideal of the parametrization map
I2 =h−a21 b21 c21 + p111 , −a21 b21 c22 + p112 , −a21 b22 c21 + p121 , −a21 b22 c22 + p122 ,
− a12 b11 c11 + p211 , −a12 b11 c12 + p212 , −a12 b12 c11 + p221 , −a12 b12 c12 + p222 i.
Eliminating parameters a11 , . . . , c22 from I1 + I2 , gives the ideal
J =hp212 p221 − p211 p222 , r221 p221 + r222 p222 , r211 p221 + r212 p222 , r212 p212 + r222 p222 ,
r211 p212 + r221 p222 , r221 p211 + r222 p212 , r212 p211 + r222 p221 , r211 p211 − r222 p222 ,
p112 p121 − p111 p122 , r121 p121 + r122 p122 , r111 p121 + r112 p122 , r112 p112 + r122 p122 ,
r111 p112 + r121 p122 , r121 p111 + r122 p112 , r112 p111 + r122 p121 , r111 p111 − r122 p122 ,
r212 r221 − r211 r222 , r112 r121 − r111 r122 i
Finally, we substitute to the ideal J the expressions
rijk = u+++ −
uijk
pijk
and clear the denominators. To obtain an estimate for p111 , we eliminate all other pijk . This
gives the ideal generated by p111 u1++ u+++ − u11+ u1+1 . Hence
p111 =
u11+ u1+1
,
u1++ u+++
as in Section 4. Similarly, one can derive estimates for other pijk .
We used the method in Example 1 to verify the formulas in Section 4.2 for MLEs on different
strata for all cases besides the 3- and 4-dimensional strata. For the 3- and 4-dimensional
strata, the elimination of pijk ’s did not terminate.
Since the rows of Table 5 are in correspondence with the boundary strata of M3 , we
believe that the method of decomposing the EM fixed point ideal will be useful for identifying
boundary strata for models whose geometry is not as well understood as for M3 . In Section 6,
we will present the minimal primes of the EM fixed point ideal for 2 × 2 × 2 tensors of
nonnegative rank at most three. We hope that such computations will serve as a starting
point for studying tensors of higher nonnegative rank.
5.1. The KKT ideal and the EM fixed point ideal. This section is devoted to a small
detour which we believe is the beginning for future work to understand the EM algorithm
better. Here, we start with the observation that the EM algorithm is trying to solve a
particular optimization problem. Then we demonstrate that the equations defining the EM
fixed point ideal are nothing but the complementary slackness conditions that appear in the
optimality (KKT) conditions for this optimization problem.
25
We start with the straightforward formulation of the MLE problem as an optimization
problem:
max
2
2 X
2 X
X
uijk log(pijk )
i=1 j=1 k=1
subject to a11 + a12 = 1
a21 + a22 = 1
b11 + b12 = 1
b21 + b22 = 1
c11 + c12 = 1
c21 + c22 = 1
λ1 + λ2 = 1
aℓj , bℓj , cℓj , λℓ ≥ 0 for ℓ, j = 1, 2
where pijk is defined as in (1). For equality constraints we introduce dual variables µa1 ,
µa2 , µb1 , µb2 , µc1 , µc2 , µλ , and for inequality constraints we also introduce dual variables
νaℓj , νbℓj , νcℓj , νλℓ for ℓ, j = 1, 2. The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions for our optimization problem consist of all the feasibility conditions in this problem together with the
complementary slackness conditions
aℓj · νaℓj = 0, bℓj · νbℓj = 0, cℓj · νcℓj = 0, λℓ · νλℓ = 0, for ℓ, j = 1, 2
and the stationarity conditions
∂f
∂aℓj
∂f
∂bℓj
∂f
∂cℓj
∂f
∂λℓ
= µaℓ + νaℓj
= µbℓ + νbℓj
= µcℓ + νcℓj
= µλ + νλℓ ,
where
f=
2 X
2 X
2
X
i=1 j=1 k=1
uijk log(pijk ) =
2 X
2 X
2
X
i=1 j=1 k=1
2 X
2 X
2
X
pijk .
uijk log(pijk ) − u+++ log
i=1 j=1 k=1
The KKT conditions are necessary conditions for optimality: if (a∗ℓj , b∗ℓj , c∗ℓj , λ∗ℓ ) is
solution for the original MLE problem and (µ∗aℓ , µ∗bℓ , µ∗cℓ , µ∗λ , νa∗ℓj , νb∗ℓj , νc∗ℓj , νλ∗ℓ ) is
an optimal
an optimal
solution to the Lagrangian dual problem, then together they make up a solution for the KKT
conditions. We call the ideal defined by the equations in the KKT conditions (but disregarding
all inequality constraints) the KKT ideal.
Theorem 27. Let (a∗ℓj , b∗ℓj , c∗ℓj , λ∗ℓ ; µ∗aℓ , µ∗bℓ , µ∗cℓ , µ∗λ , νa∗ℓj , νb∗ℓj , νc∗ℓj , νλ∗ℓ ) be a zero of the KKT
ideal with λ1 , λ2 6= 0. Then (a∗ℓj , b∗ℓj , c∗ℓj , λ∗ℓ ) is a zero of the EM fixed point ideal. Conversely,
if (a∗ℓj , b∗ℓj , c∗ℓj , λ∗ℓ ) is a zero of the EM fixed point ideal with aℓ1 + aℓ2 = bℓ1 + bℓ2 = cℓ1 + cℓ2 = 1
26
for ℓ = 1, 2, and λ1 + λ2 = 1, then there exists (µ∗aℓ , µ∗bℓ , µ∗cℓ , µ∗λ , νa∗ℓj , νb∗ℓj , νc∗ℓj , νλ∗ℓ ) which
extends to a zero of the KKT ideal.
Proof. For the forward direction, we first prove that µ∗aℓ , µ∗bℓ , µ∗cℓ , µ∗λ = 0. We compute that
2
2
2
XXX
∂f
=
∂λℓ
i=1 j=1 k=1
uijk
− u+++ aℓi bℓj cℓk = µλ + νλℓ .
pijk
∂f
∂f
+λ2 ∂λ
= 0, and this in turn is equal to µλ (λ1 +λ2 )+νλ1 λ1 +νλ2 λ2 =
It is easily seen that λ1 ∂λ
1
2
µλ . We will also explicitly prove that µa1 = 0 (the other cases are done with the exact same
reasoning). Again we compute that
2
2
XX
∂f
=
∂a1s
j=1 k=1
usjk
− u+++ λ1 b1j c1k = µa1 + νa1s .
psjk
Now on the one hand
a11
∂f
∂f
+ a12
= µa1 (a11 + a12 ) + νa11 a11 + νa12 a12 = µa1 ,
∂a11
∂a12
and on the other hand the direct computation gives
a11
∂f
∂f
+ a12
= 0.
∂a11
∂a12
This shows that µa1 = 0. We are ready to conclude, for instance,
2
2 X
X
u1jk
∂f
= a11
− u+++ λ1 b1j c1k = 0.
a11
∂a11
p1jk
j=1 k=1
After dividing by λ1 6= 0 we obtain an equation of the EM fixed point ideal:
2
2 X
X
r1jk b1j c1k = 0.
a11
j=1 k=1
The other equations are derived in a similar way.
Conversely, given a solution of the EM fixed point ideal, let µaℓ = µbℓ = µcℓ = µλ = 0, and
let
2 X
2
X
rijk λℓ bℓj cℓk .
νaℓi :=
j=1 k=1
Define νbℓj and νcℓk in a similar manner. Note that νaℓi =
νλℓ :=
2
2 X
2 X
X
∂f
∂aℓi .
Also let
rijk aℓi bℓj cℓk ,
i=1 j=1 k=1
and note that νλℓ =
∂f
∂λℓ .
27
6. Other models and Simulations
In this section, we briefly outline some interesting questions that our investigations have
brought up, and highlight possible directions for future research. We will not be comprehensive here, only reporting preliminary results in scant detail, but with an eye towards spurring
and encouraging a wider audience to be interested in these topics where so much remains
unknown.
In particular, we note that we have focused primarily on latent class models with r = 2
states at the hidden node. This corresponds to distributions that are tensors of rank+ ≤ 2.
This case in some ways is ‘easy’ since both the algebraic boundary and the singular set
of the parameterization map are well understood. Indeed, it is convenient that if a Markov
matrix parameter is singular, then it has identical rows. When considering questions of higher
nonnegative rank, we have no such tools at our disposal. In a first extension of our work, we
investigate 2 × 2 × 2 tensors of rank+ ≤ 3 and in particular minimal primes of its EM fixed
point ideal. We link the results with the boundary stratification poset of M3,3 in [27].
For a second generalization, we consider 3 × 3 × 2 tensors of nonnegative rank 3. This
latent class model has the advantage, like M3 , that its Zariski closure is the full ambient
space so that its points satisfy a single trivial equation: the sum of coordinates is 1. Here
we have no theorems about the boundary stratification nor formulas for MLEs. Instead, we
looked at EM attraction basins for interior points and facets corresponding to the boundary
of parameter space Θ. In doing so, we can report the relative volume of the model space in
the simplex ∆17 . Details are given below in subsection 6.2.
Since we only consider distributions for models with only n = 3 random variables in this
section, we
that the matrix parameters will be denoted by
adapt the convention
once again
A = aij , B = bij , and C = cij and the format determined by the particular model
under consideration. Thus, for instance, in the EM fixed point ideal computation all three
matrices are 3 × 2.
6.1. EM fixed point ideal for M3 . We extend the computations of Theorem 26 to the
case of 2 × 2 × 2-tensors of nonnegative rank ≤ 3.
Theorem 28. The radical of the EM fixed point ideal F for M3,3 has precisely 317 relevant
primes consisting of 21 orbital classes. The properties of these orbital classes are listed in
Table 6.
Table 6
Minimal primes of EM fixed point ideal F for 2 × 2 × 2-tensors of rank+ 3.
Set S
{∅}
{a11 }
{a11 , a21 }
|S| a’s b’s c’s deg cdim rA rB rC orbit
0
0
0
0 121
10
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0 162
9
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
0 162
9
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0 162
9
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
38
10
2
2
2 6×1
0
0
0
0
1
8
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
10
10
2
2
2
18
2
2
0
0
5
9
2
2
2
18
28
Table 6 (Continued)
Set S
|S| a’s b’s c’s deg cdim rA rB rC orbit
{a11 , b11 }
2
1
1
0
39
10
2
2
2
36
{a11 , a21 , a32 }
3
3
0
0
50
11
2
2
2
18
{a11 , b11 , c11 }
3
1
1
1
60
11
2
2
2
24
{a11 , a21 , b11 , b21 }
4
2
2
0
11
10
2
2
2
36
{a11 , a22 , b11 , b22 }
4
2
2
0
8
11
2
2
2
36
{a11 , a21 , b11 , b21 , c11 , c21 } 6
2
2
2
23
11
2
2
2
24
{a11 , a21 , b11 , b22 , c11 , c22 } 6
2
2
2
20
12
2
2
2
72
{a11 , a22 , b11 , b22 , c11 , c22 } 6
2
2
2
23
12
2
2
2
24
Some of the ideals listed in Table 6 have further constraints on A, B and C that cannot
be read off directly from the table. These constraints are:
(1) One out of the six ideals of degree 38 corresponding to {∅} contains polynomials
a11 a22 − a12 a21 , b21 b32 − b22 b31 and c11 c32 − c12 c31 . Constraints for the rest of the five
ideals are obtained by permuting simultaneously the rows of A, B and C.
(2) The ideal corresponding to {a11 } contains polynomials b21 b32 − b22 b31 and c21 c32 −
c22 c31 .
(3) The ideal corresponding to {a11 , b11 } contains the polynomial c21 c32 − c22 c31 .
(4) The ideal corresponding to {a11 , a21 , a32 } contains polynomials b11 b22 − b12 b21 and
c11 c22 − c12 c21 .
(5) The ideal corresponding to {a11 , b11 , c11 } contains polynomials a21 a32 −a22 a31 , b21 b32 −
b22 b31 and c21 c32 − c22 c31 .
The semialgebraic description, boundary stratification and closed formulas for MLEs for
M3,3 are obtained in [27]. The boundary stratification poset for M3,3 agrees with the one
for M3 in Figure 3. The parameters that yield different types of boundary strata for M3,3
are included in Table 6:
(1) Interior: {∅} (A, B, C rank 2, no further constraints on A, B and C).
(2) Codimension 1 strata: {a11 }∗ , {a11 , a21 }.
(3) Exceptional codimension 2 strata: {a11 , a21 , a32 }∗ .
(4) Codimension 2 strata: {a11 , b11 }∗ , {a11 , a21 , b11 , b21 }.
(5) Exceptional codimension 3 strata: {∅}∗ (A, B or C rank 1).
(6) Codimension 3 strata: {a11 , b11 , c11 }∗ , {a11 , a21 , b11 , b21 , c11 , c21 }.
(7) Unique codimension 4 stratum: {∅}∗ (A, B and C rank 1).
(8) Other: {∅}∗ (A, B, C rank 2, further constraints on A, B and C), {a11 , a22 , b11 , b22 },
{a11 , a21 , b11 , b22 , c11 , c22 }, {a11 , a22 , b11 , b22 , c11 , c22 }.
A star indicates that besides setting the elements in the set to zero, further equation constraints on the parameters (either rank constraints from Table 6 or other constraints from the
list above) are needed to define the stratum. Taking these further constraints into account,
for a fixed type of boundary stratum, all parametrizations from Table 6 are minimal. All the
rows of Table 6 that do not give boundary strata lie on the singular locus of M3,3 .
6.2. EM attraction basins for 3×3×2 tensors of rank+ ≤ 3. We do not have a complete
description of the boundary strata for tensors of nonnegative rank 3, nor formulas for MLEs.
This model, denoted by M∗ , lies as a full-dimensional, proper subset of ∆17 (i.e. with Zariski
closure the full ambient space). To be concrete, dim(Θ) = 17 = dim(M∗ ), and we are
29
interested in giving an estimate for the relative volume of M∗ in ∆17 and in obtaining some
preliminary understanding of attraction basins for distributions sampled from ∆17 under EM.
The EM algorithm was coded in MATLAB, and two sorts of tests were undertaken. For an
arbitrary distribution P ∈ ∆17 , we ran EM from ten different starting points, recorded the
parameters θ0 ∈ Θ to which EM converged, and took the optimal estimate. Without a full
description of the boundary strata of M∗ , we classified the EM estimate into four categories:
1) the EM estimate θ0 contains strictly positive entries; 2) the EM estimate θ0 contains exactly
one zero entry in a 3 × 3 Markov matrix; 3) the EM estimate θ0 contains exactly one zero
entry in the 3 × 2 Markov matrix; 4) the EM estimate θ0 contains exactly k zero entries for
k ∈ {2, ..., 11}. The idea is that these numbers give approximations to which points of Θ,
either interior or on a boundary face of Θ, the EM estimates are drawn. Concretely, these
numbers are used to estimate
(1) the relative volume of M∗ ( ∆17 ;
(2) the EM attraction basin proportion for the 6 irreducible components of the algebraic
boundary given by a single zero in a 3 × 3 Markov matrix A or B;
(3) the EM attraction basin proportion for the 2 irreducible components of the algebraic
boundary given by a single zero in the 3 × 2 Markov matrix C;
(4) the EM attraction basin proportions for intersections of k facets of Θ.
For 106 iterations, the proportions (given as percentages) of these EM attraction basins
are given in Table 7, where 1a-codim corresponds to the relative volume of category (2) and
1b-codim to the relative volume of category (3). We separated categories (2) and (3), since
(3) corresponds to a context specific independence model, but (2) does not.
We note that the highest concentration of estimates is in the faces of Θ of codimension 4,
though we have no insight as to why this is the case. Also the relative volume of M∗ ( ∆17 ,
filling out only approximately .019% is remarkably small, particularly when compared to
relative volume estimates for M3 and M3,3 .
As a second test, we ran EM for the same P ∈ ∆17 , but with 104 different starting points.
As expected, EM converged to many local optima on the nonconvex M∗ , with a majority
(almost 76%) in the codim-4 stratum.
Table 7
Relative volume of EM attraction basins of strata in M∗ using 10 different starting
parameters for 106 uniformly distributed points over ∆17 .
0-codim 1a-codim 1b-codim 2-codim 3-codim 4-codim
0.019
0.2845
0.0621
3.4814 17.0098 40.1676
5-codim 6-codim 7-codim 8-codim 9-codim 10-codim 11-codim
25.7120 11.2486 1.7677
0.2249
0.0199
0.0025
0
7. Conclusions
Latent class model admits a nonconvex likelihood function with many local maxima. Typically, the model is fitted with the EM algorithm but this procedure comes with no guarantees
of reaching the global maximum. The complicated geometry of this model class does not
allow for a simple analysis. In this paper we carefully studied the boundary of the binary
latent class model in order to get better control over the likelihood optimization process.
30
For the 2 × 2 × 2 case we obtained an exact procedure of computing the global maximum
of the likelihood function over the corresponding model. This gave us tools for studying the
performance of the EM algorithm. Our simulations provide evidence that unless correlations
between the variables in the model are high and the sample size is reasonably large, with high
probability, the MLE will lie on the boundary of the probability simplex. This points to a
limitation of the latent class models.
Our theoretical work shows that the boundary of the binary latent class model is very
structured and the singular locus plays an important role in its description. The complementary work of [27] exhibits that similar techniques can be used for latent class models with
a larger number of latent states. Understanding more general latent class models and their
connections to other models, like Restricted Boltzmann Machines, is an important research
direction. We expect that further simplifications can be obtained by taking into account
various group actions.
References
[1] Elizabeth S. Allman, Catherine Matias, and John A. Rhodes. Identifiability of parameters in latent structure models with many observed variables. Ann. Statist., 37(6A):3099–3132, 2009.
[2] Elizabeth S. Allman, John A. Rhodes, Bernd Sturmfels, and Piotr Zwiernik. Tensors of nonnegative rank
two. Linear Algebra Appl., 473:37–53, 2015.
[3] Elizabeth S. Allman, John A. Rhodes, and Amelia Taylor. A semialgebraic description of the general
Markov model on phylogenetic trees. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 28(2):736–755, 2014.
[4] Christopher M. Bishop. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Information Science and Statistics.
Springer, New York, 2006.
[5] Craig Boutilier, Nir Friedman, Moises Goldszmidt, and Daphne Koller. Context-specific independence
in bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the Twelfth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial
intelligence, pages 115–123. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1996.
[6] Fabrizio Catanese, Serkan Hoşten, Amit Khetan, and Bernd Sturmfels. The maximum likelihood degree.
Amer. J. Math., 128(3):671–697, 2006.
[7] Vin de Silva and Lek-Heng Lim. Tensor rank and the ill-posedness of the best low-rank approximation
problem. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 30(3):1084–1127, 2008.
[8] A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM
algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 39(1):1–38, 1977. With discussion.
[9] David Eisenbud and Bernd Sturmfels. Binomial ideals. Duke Mathematical Journal, 84(1):1–45, 1996.
[10] Stephen E. Fienberg. Discussion on the paper by Dempster, Laird, and Rubin. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser.
B, 39(1):29–30, 1977.
[11] Stephen E. Fienberg, Patricia Hersh, Alessandro Rinaldo, and Yi Zhou. Maximum likelihood estimation
in latent class models for contingency table data. In Algebraic and geometric methods in statistics, pages
27–62. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010.
[12] Luis David Garcia, Michael Stillman, and Bernd Sturmfels. Algebraic geometry of Bayesian networks. J.
Symbolic Comput., 39(3-4):331–355, 2005.
[13] Francisca Galindo Garre and Jeroen K Vermunt. Avoiding boundary estimates in latent class analysis by
bayesian posterior mode estimation. Behaviormetrika, 33(1):43–59, 2006.
[14] Dan Geiger, David Heckerman, Henry King, and Christopher Meek. Stratified exponential families: graphical models and model selection. Annals of Statistics, pages 505–529, 2001.
[15] Zvi Gilula. Singular value decomposition of probability matrices: Probabilistic aspects of latent dichotomous variables. Biometrika, 66(2):339–344, 1979.
[16] Leo A. Goodman. On the estimation of parameters in latent structure analysis. Psychometrika, 44(1):123–
128, Mar 1979.
[17] Shelby J. Haberman. Log-linear models for frequency tables derived by indirect observation: maximum
likelihood equations. Ann. Statist., 2:911–924, 1974.
[18] Serkan Hoşten, Amit Khetan, and Bernd Sturmfels. Solving the likelihood equations. Found. Comput.
Math., 5(4):389–407, 2005.
31
[19] Joseph B. Kruskal. More factors than subjects, tests and treatments: an indeterminacy theorem for
canonical decomposition and individual differences scaling. Psychometrika, 41(3):281–293, 1976.
[20] Joseph B. Kruskal. Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with application
to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra and Appl., 18(2):95–138, 1977.
[21] Kaie Kubjas, Elina Robeva, and Bernd Sturmfels. Fixed points EM algorithm and nonnegative rank
boundaries. Ann. Statist., 43(1):422–461, 2015.
[22] Steffen L. Lauritzen. Graphical models, volume 17 of Oxford Statistical Science Series. The Clarendon
Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996. Oxford Science Publications.
[23] Paul F. Lazarsfeld. The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. Studies in Social
Psychology in World War II Vol. IV: Measurement and Prediction, pages 362–412, 1950.
[24] Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Neil W. Henry. Latent Structure Analysis. Houghton, Mifflin, New York, 1968.
[25] Mateusz Michalek, Luke Oeding, and Piotr Zwiernik. Secant cumulants and toric geometry. International
Mathematics Research Notices, 2015(12):4019–4063, 2015.
[26] Lior Pachter and Bernd Sturmfels. Algebraic statistics for computational biology, volume 13. Cambridge
university press, 2005.
[27] Anna Seigal and Guido Montúfar. Mixtures and products in two graphical models. arXiv:1709.05276,
2017.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Alaska, Fairbanks
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Alaska, Fairbanks
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Statistics, University of Oxford
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics, San Francisco State University.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Laboratory for Information & Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Laboratoire d’Informatique, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics, San Francisco State University.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Alaska, Fairbanks
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
32
| 10math.ST
|
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
arXiv:1409.1085v3 [math.GR] 2 Apr 2016
WERNER THUMANN
Abstract. We propose a new unifying framework for Thompson-like groups
using a well-known device called operads and category theory as language.
We discuss examples of operad groups which have appeared in the literature
before. As a first application, we proof a theorem which implies that planar or
symmetric or braided operads with transformations satisfying some finiteness
conditions yield operad groups of type F∞ . This unifies and extends existing
proofs that certain Thompson-like groups are of type F∞ .
Contents
1. Introduction
1.1. Structure of the article
1.2. Notation and conventions
1.3. Acknowledgements
2. Preliminaries on categories
2.1. Comma categories
2.2. The classifying space of a category
2.3. The fundamental groupoid of a category
2.4. Coverings of categories
2.5. Contractibility and homotopy equivalences
2.6. Smashing isomorphisms in categories
2.7. Calculus of fractions and cancellation properties
2.8. Monoidal categories
2.9. Cones and joins
2.10. The Morse method for categories
3. Operad groups
3.1. Basic definitions
3.2. Normal forms
3.3. Calculus of fractions and cancellation properties
3.4. Operads with transformations
3.5. Examples
4. A topological finiteness result
4.1. Three types of arc complexes
4.2. A contractible complex
4.3. Isotropy groups
4.4. Finite type filtration
4.5. Connectivity of the filtration
4.6. Applications
References
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
11
13
14
18
18
22
23
24
26
32
33
39
39
42
43
53
54
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 20F65; Secondary 57M07, 20F05, 18D50.
Key words and phrases. Thompson groups, operads, finiteness properties.
1
2
WERNER THUMANN
1. Introduction
In unpublished notes of 1965, Richard Thompson defined three interesting groups
F, T, V . For example, F is the group of all orientation preserving piecewise linear
homeomorphisms of the unit interval with breakpoints lying in the dyadic rationals
and with slopes being powers of 2. It has the presentation
F = x0 , x1 , x2 , . . . | x−1
k xn xk = xn+1 for k < n
In the subsequent years until the present days, hundreds of papers have been devoted to these and to related groups. The reason for this is that they have the ability
to unite seemingly incompatible properties. For example, Thompson showed that
V is an infinite finitely-presented simple group which contains every finite group
as a subgroup. Even more is true: Brown showed in [7] that V is of type F∞
which means that there is a classifying space for V with finitely many cells in every
dimension. For F , this was proven by Brown and Geoghegan in [8]. They also
showed that H k (F, ZF ) = 0 for every k ≥ 0. This implies in particular that all
homotopy groups of F at infinity vanish and that F has infinite cohomological dimension. Thus, they found the first example of an infinite dimensional torsion-free
group of type F∞ . In [6], Brin and Squier showed that F is a free group free group,
i.e. contains no non-abelian free subgroups. Geoghegan conjectured in 1979 that F
is non-amenable. If this is true, F would be an elegant counterexample to the von
Neumann conjecture. Ol’shanskii disproved the von Neumann conjecture around
1980 by giving a different counterexample (see [32] and the references therein). Despite several attempts of various authors, the amenability question for F still seems
to be open at the time of writing. During the 1970s, Thompson’s group F was
rediscovered twice: In the context of homotopy theory by Freyd and Heller [21] and
in connection with a problem in shape theory by Dydak [12].
Since the introduction of the classical Thompson groups F, T and V , a lot of
generalizations have appeared in the literature which have a “Thompson-esque”
feeling to them. Among them are the so-called diagram or picture groups [25],
various groups of piecewise linear homeomorphisms of the unit interval [39], groups
acting on ultrametric spaces via local similarities [26], higher dimensional Thompson groups nV [4] and the braided Thompson group BV [5]. A recurrent theme
in the study of these groups are topological finiteness properties, most notably
property F∞ . The proof of this property is very similar in each case, going back
to a method of Brown, the Brown criterion [7], and a technique of Bestvina and
Brady, the discrete Morse Lemma for affine complexes [2]. This program has been
conducted in all the above mentioned classes of groups: For diagram or picture
groups in [14, 15], for the piecewise linear homeomorphisms in [39], for local similarity groups in [16], for the higher dimensional Thompson groups in [20] and for
the braided Thompson group in [9].
The main motivation to define the class of operad groups, which are the central
objects in this article, was to find a framework in which a lot of the Thompsonlike groups could be recovered and in which the established techniques could be
performed to show property F∞ , thus unifying and extending existing proofs in the
literature. The main device to define these groups are discrete operads. Operads are
well established objects whose importance in mathematics and physics has steadily
increased during the last decades. Representations of operads constitute algebras
of various types and consequently find applications in such diverse areas as LieTheory, Noncommutative Geometry, Algebraic Topology, Differential Geometry,
Field Theories and many more. To apply our F∞ theorem to a given Thompsonlike group, one has to find the operadic structure underlying the group. Then one
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
3
has to check whether this operad satisfies certain finiteness conditions. In a lot of
cases, the proofs of these conditions are either trivial or straightforward.
1.1. Structure of the article. Our language will be strongly category theory
flavoured. Although we assume the basics of category theory, we collect and recall
in Section 2 all the tools we will need for the definition of operad groups and for
our main result. We lay a particular emphasis on topological aspects of categories
by considering categories as topological objects via the nerve functor. This can be
made precise by endowing the category of (small) categories with a model structure
Quillen equivalent to the usual homotopy category of spaces, but we won’t use this
fact. In Subsection 2.10, we will discuss a tool which is probably not so well-known
as the others. There, we introduce the discrete Morse method for categories in
analogy to the one for simplicial complexes: With the help of a Morse function,
a category can be filtered by a nested sequence of full subcategories. The relative
connectivity of such a filtration is controlled by the connectivity of certain categories
associated to each filtration step, the so-called descending links. This can be used
to compute lower bounds for the connectivity of categories.
In Section 3, we will introduce the main objects of this article, the so-called
operad groups. Before we do this, we recall the notion of operads (internal to the
category of sets). This is an abstract algebraic structure generalizing that of a
monoid. It comes with an associative multiplication and with identity elements.
However, elements in an operad, which are called operations, can be of higher arity
(or degree): An operation posseses several inputs and one output. If we have an
operation with n inputs, then we can plug the outputs of n other operations into
the inputs of the first one, yielding composition maps for the operad. This concept
can be generalized even more: Just as one proceeds from monoids to categories by
introducing further objects, we can introduce colors to operads and label the inputs
and outputs of operations with these colors. Then we require that the composition
maps respect this coloring. Furthermore, we can introduce actions of the symmetric
or braid groups on the inputs of the operations and obtain symmetric or braided
operads.
We then attach, in a very natural way, a category to each operad, called the
category of operators. When taking fundamental groups of these categories, we
arrive at the concept of operad groups. In Subsection 3.5, we then discuss some
examples of operads and corresponding operad groups. We will see that all of the
Thompson-like groups mentioned in the first part of the introduction can be realized
as operad groups. Furthermore, we give new examples and even a procedure how
to generate a lot of these Thompson-like groups as operad groups associated to
suboperads of endomorphism operads.
We will also discuss so-called operads with transformations which are operads
with invertible degree 1 operations. In this context, we will introduce very elementary and elementary operations. These model in some sense the generators and
relations in such an operad with transformations. In particular, we can define what
it means for such an operad to be finitely generated or of finite type. This will be
important in Section 4 where we prove the following
Theorem. Let O be a finite type (symmetric/braided) operad with transformations
which is color-tame and such that there are only finitely many colors and degree 1
operations. Assume further that O satisfies the cancellative calculus of fractions.
Then the operad groups associated to O are of type F∞ .
The conditions are explained in the text and are usually not hard to verify in
practice. The proof proceeds roughly as follows and the ideas are mainly inspired
by [2, 7, 9, 20, 39]. Denote by S the category of operators of O. We then can
4
WERNER THUMANN
look at the universal covering category U of S which is contractible due to the
conditions in the theorem. We mod out the isomorphisms in U and obtain the
quotient category U/G which is still contractible. The operad group Γ, which is
the fundamental group of S, acts on U by deck transformations. This induces an
action on U/G. Brown’s criterion applied to this action yields that Γ is of type F∞
if we show that the isotropy groups of the action are of type F∞ and if we find a
filtration by invariant finity type subcategories with relative connectivity tending
to infinity. The latter is shown by appealing to the discrete Morse method for
categories mentioned earlier. Thus, we have to inspect the connectivity of certain
descending links. This is the hardest part of the proof. We filter each descending
link by two subcategories, the core and the corona. The core is related to certain
arc complexes in Rd with d = 1, 2, 3. A lower bound for the connectivity of these
complexes is given in Theorem 4.9. The connectivity for the corona and for the
whole descending link is then deduced from the connectivity of the core by using
again the discrete Morse method.
1.2. Notation and conventions. When f : A → B and g : B → C are two composable arrows, we write f ∗ g or f g for the composite A → C instead of the usual
notation g ◦ f . Consequently, it is often better to plug in arguments from the left.
When we do this, we use the notation x⊲f for the evaluation of f at x. However,
we won’t entirely drop the usual notation f (x) and use both notations side by side.
Objects of type Aut(X) will be made into a group by the definition f · g := f ∗ g.
Conversely, a group G is considered as a groupoid with one object and arrows the
elements in G together with the composition f ∗ g := f · g.
1.3. Acknowledgements. I want to thank my adviser Roman Sauer for the opportunity to pursue mathematics, for his guidance, encouragement and support
over the last few years. I also gratefully acknowledge financial support by the DFG
grants 1661/3-1 and 1661/3-2.
2. Preliminaries on categories
In this section, we review some aspects of category theory which we need for
later considerations. In particular, we want to emphasize the concept of seeing
categories as topological objects. Note that everything, except the Morse method
for categories explained in Subsection 2.10, should be mathematical folklore and
we make no claim of originality.
f
g
2.1. Comma categories. Let A −
→ C ←
− B be two functors. Then the comma
category f ↓g has as objects all the triples (A, B, γ) where A resp. B is an object
in A resp. B and γ : f (A) → g(B) is an arrow in C. An arrow from (A, B, γ) to
(A′ , B ′ , γ ′ ) is a pair (α, β) of arrows α : A → A′ in A and β : B → B ′ in B such
that the diagram
f (A)
γ
f (α)
f (A′ )
/ g(B)
g(β)
γ′
/ g(B ′ )
commutes. Composition is given by composing the components.
If f is the inclusion of a subcategory, we write A↓g for the comma category f ↓g.
Furthermore, if A is just a subcategory with one object A and its identity arrow, we
write A↓g. In this case, the objects of the comma category are pairs (B, γ) where
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
5
B is an object in B and γ : A → g(B) is an arrow. An arrow from (B, γ) to (B ′ , γ ′ )
is an arrow β : B → B ′ such that the triangle
g(B)
③<
③
③③
③③
③③
g(β)
A❉
❉❉
❉❉
❉❉
❉"
γ′
g(B ′ )
γ
commutes. Of course, there are analogous abbreviations for the right factor.
2.2. The classifying space of a category. We assume that the reader is familiar
with the basics of simplicial sets (see e.g. [24]). The nerve N (C) of a category C is
a simplicial set defined as follows: A k-simplex is a sequence
α
α
αk−1
1
0
. . . −−−→ Ak
A1 −→
A0 −→
of k composable arrows. The i’th face map di : N (C)k → N (C)k−1 is given by
composing the arrows at the object Ai . When i is 0 or k, then the object Ai
is removed from the sequence instead. The i’th degeneracy map si : N (C)k →
N (C)k+1 is given by inserting the identity at the object Ai .
The geometric realization |N (C)| of N (C) is a CW-complex which we call the
classifying space B(C) of C. See [43] for the reason why this is called a classifying
space. If the category C is a group, then B(C) is the usual classifying space of
the group which is defined as the unique space (up to homotopy equivalence) with
fundamental group the given group and with higher homotopy groups vanishing.
Since we can view any category as a space via the above construction, any
topological notion or concept can be transported to the world of categories. For
example, if we say that the category C is connected, then we mean that B(C) is
connected. Of course, one can easily think of an intrinsic definition of connectedness
for categories and we will give some for other topological concepts below. But there
are also concepts for which a combinatorial description is at least unknown, for
example higher homotopy groups.
Transporting topological concepts to the category CAT of (small) categories via
the nerve functor can be made precise: The Thomason model structure on CAT
[10, 40] is a model structure Quillen equivalent to the usual model structure on
SSET, the category of simplicial sets.
Every simplicial complex is homeomorphic to the classifying space of some category: A simplicial complex can be seen as a partially ordered set of simplices
with the order relation given by the face relation. Moreover, a partially ordered
set (poset) is just a category with at most one arrow between any two objects.
The classifying space of a poset coming from a simplicial complex is exactly the
barycentric subdivision of the simplicial complex.
Even more is true: McDuff showed in [31] that for each connected simplicial complex there is a monoid (i.e. a category with only one object) with classifying space
homotopy equivalent to the given complex. Thus, every path-connected space has
the weak homotopy type of some monoid. For example, observe the monoid consisting of the identity element and elements xij with multiplication rules xij xkl = xil .
In [17] it is shown that its classifying space is homotopy equivalent to the 2-sphere.
2.3. The fundamental groupoid of a category. Following the philosophy of
transporting topological concepts to categories via the nerve functor, we define the
fundamental groupoid π1 (C) of a category C to be the fundamental groupoid of its
6
WERNER THUMANN
classifying space. There is also an intrinsic description of the fundamental groupoid
of C in terms of the category itself which we will describe now (see e.g. [24, Chapter
III, Corollary 1.2] that these two notions are indeed the same up to equivalence).
The objects of π1 (C) are the objects of C and the arrows of π1 (C) are paths modulo
homotopy. Here, a path in C from an object A to an object B is a zig-zag of
morphisms from A to B, i.e. starting from A, one travels from object to object
over the arrows of C, regardless of the direction of the arrows. For example, the
following zig-zag is a path in C
A ← C1 → C2 ← C3 ← C4 → C5 → B
Paths can be concatenated in the obvious way. The homotopy relation on paths is
the smallest equivalence relation respecting the operation of concatenation of paths
generated by the following elementary relations:
α
β
α
β
α
α
A
A
id
A
id
A
A−
→B−
→C
A←
−B←
−C
αβ
∼
A −−→ C
∼
A ←−− C
A−
→B←
−A ∼
α
α
A←
−B−
→A ∼
A −→ A ∼
A ←− A ∼
βα
where the A’s on the right represent the empty path at A. Composition in π1 (C)
is given by concatenating representatives. The identities are represented by the
empty paths. If A is an object of C then we denote by π1 (C, A) the automorphism
group of π1 (C) at A and call it the fundamental group of C at A.
The fundamental groupoid of C has two further descriptions: First, denote by
G the left adjoint functor to the inclusion functor from groupoids to categories.
Then we have π1 (C) = G(C). Second, it is the localization C[C −1 ] of C (at all its
morphisms) since it comes with a canonical functor ϕ : C → π1 (C) satisfying the
following universal property: Having any other functor η : C → A with the property
that η(f ) is an isomorphism in A for every arrow f in C, then there is a unique
functor ǫ : π1 (C) → A such that ϕǫ = η.
ϕ
/ π1 (C)
C❉
❉❉
❉❉
❉
ǫ
η ❉❉
❉!
A
2.4. Coverings of categories. Let P : D → C be a functor. We say that P is a
covering if for every arrow a in C and every object X in D which projects via P
onto the domain or the codomain of a, there exists exactly one arrow b in D with
domain resp. codomain X and projecting onto a via P . In other words, arrows
can be lifted uniquely provided that the lift of the domain or codomain is given.
Of course, P yields a map on the classifying spaces. To justify the definition of
covering functor, we have the following:
Proposition 2.1. Let P : D → C be a functor. Then P is a covering functor if
and only if BP : BD → BC is a covering map of spaces.
Proof. By [22, Appendix I, 3.2], BP = |N P | : |N D| → |N C| is a covering map if and
only if N P : N D → N C is a covering of simplicial sets as defined in [22, Appendix
I, 2.1]. This means that every n-simplex in N C uniquely lifts to N D provided that
the lift of a vertex of the simplex is given. The lifting property for P as defined
above says that this is true for 1-simplices. So it is clear that P is a covering functor
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
7
provided that BP is a covering map of spaces. For the converse implication, one
exploits special properties of nerves of categories. Not every simplicial set arises
as the nerve of a category. The Segal condition gives a necessary and sufficient
condition for a simplicial set to come from a category: Every horn Λin for 0 < i < n
can be uniquely filled by an n-simplex. Using this, the lifting property for 1simplices implies the lifting property for n-simplices.
Now let C be a category and X an object in C. Observe the canonical functor
ϕ : C → π1 (C). Define UX (C) to be the category X↓ϕ. The canonical projection
UX (C) → C sending an object (B, γ) to B is a covering. Furthermore, UX (C) is
simply connected, i.e. connected and its fundamental groupoid is equivalent to the
terminal category (see [33]). So it deserves the name universal covering category.
More precisely, it is the universal covering of the component of C which contains
the object X.
There is a canonical functor π1 (C) → CAT taking objects X to the category
UX (C) and an arrow f : X → Y to a functor UX (C) → UY (C) which is given by
precomposition with f −1 . Fixing the object X, this functor restricts to a functor
π1 (C, X) → CAT sending the unique object of the group π1 (C, X) to the universal
covering UX (C). This is the same as a representation
of π1 (C, X) in CAT, i.e. a group
homomorphism ρ : π1 (C, X) → Aut UX (C) into the group of invertible functors
with multiplication given by f · g := f ∗ g. Equivalently, this is a right action of the
group π1 (C, X) on UX (C) given by the formula α · γ := α⊲(γ⊲ρ) for γ ∈ π1 (C, X)
and arrows α in UX (C). This gives the usual deck transformations on the universal
covering.
2.5. Contractibility and homotopy equivalences. We say that a category is
contractible if its classifying space is contractible and we say that a functor F : C →
D is a homotopy equivalence if BF : BC → BD is one. There are some standard
conditions which assure that a category is contractible or a functor is a homotopy
equivalence. These will be recalled below.
A non-empty category C is contractible if
i) C has an initial object.
ii) C has binary products.
iii) C is a generalized poset (see Definition 2.8) and there is an object X0
together with a functor F : C → C such that for each object X there exist
arrows X → F (X) ← X0 (compare with [35, Subsection 1.5]).
iv) C is filtered which means that for every two objects X, Y there is an object
Z with arrows X → Z, Y → Z and for every two arrows f, g : A → B there
is an arrow h : B → C such that f h = gh.
Of course, the dual statements are also true. It is instructive to sketch the arguments for these four claims:
i) Let I be the category with two objects and one non-identity arrow from
the first to the second object. The classifying space of I is the unit interval
I. A natural transformation of two functors f, g : C → D can be interpreted
as a functor C × I → D. On the level of spaces, this gives a homotopy
BC × I → BD. If C is a category with initial object X0 , then there is
a unique natural transformation from the functor constX0 (sending every
arrow of C to idX0 ) to the identity functor idC . On the level of spaces, this
yields a homotopy between idBC and the constant map BC → BC with
value the point X0 .
ii) Choose an object X0 in C. Let F : C → C be the functor Y 7→ X0 × Y .
Projection onto the first factor yields a natural transformation F → constX0
and projection onto the second factor yields a natural transformation F →
8
WERNER THUMANN
idC . This gives two homotopies which together give the desired contraction
of BC.
iii) First note that, if F, G : C → C are two functors with the property that
there is an arrow F (X) → G(X) for each object X, then this already
defines a natural transformation F → G by uniqueness of arrows in the
generalized poset. Now the conditions on X0 and F yield that there are
natural transformations idC → F and constX0 → F . On the level of spaces
this gives the desired contraction of BC.
iv) First, let D be a finite subcategory of C. We claim that there exists a
cocone over D in C, i.e. there is an object Z in C and for each object Y in
D an arrow Y → Z which commute with the arrows in D. This cocone is
contractible because Z is a terminal object. A cocone can be constructed
as follows: First pick two objects Y1 , Y2 in D and find an object Z ′ with
arrows Y1 → Z ′ and Y2 → Z ′ . Pick another object Y3 and find an object
Z ′′ with arrows Y3 → Z ′′ and Z ′ → Z ′′ . Repeating this with all objects of
D, we obtain an object Q together with arrows fY : Y → Q for every object
Y in D. The fY probably won’t commute with the arrows in D yet, but we
can repair this by repeatedly applying the second property of filteredness.
Pick an arrow d : Y → Y ′ in D and observe the parallel arrows dfY ′ and fY .
Apply the second property to find an arrow ω : Q → Q′ with dfY ′ ω = fY ω.
Replace Q by Q′ and all the arrows fD for objects D in D by fD ω. Repeat
this with all the other arrows in D.
Now to finish the proof of this item, take a map S n → BC. Since S n
is compact, it can be homotoped to a map such that the image is covered
by the geometric realization of a finite subcategory. The cocone over this
subcategory then gives the desired null-homotopy.
We recall Quillen’s famous Theorem A from [34] which gives a sufficient but in
general not necessary condition for a functor to be a homotopy equivalence.
Theorem 2.2. Let f : C → D be a functor. If for each object Y in D the category
Y ↓f is contractible, then the functor f is a homotopy equivalence. Similarly, if
the category f ↓Y is contractible for each object Y in D, then f is a homotopy
equivalence.
Remark 2.3. When applying this theorem to an inclusion f : A → B of a full
subcategory, it suffices to check Y ↓f = Y ↓A for objects Y not in A. If Y is an
object in A, the comma category Y ↓A has the object (Y, idY ) as initial object and
thus is automatically contractible. Similar remarks apply to the comma categories
f ↓Y = A↓Y .
Remark 2.4. If D is a groupoid, then for Y, Y ′ ∈ D the comma categories Y ↓f and
Y ′ ↓f are isomorphic. Thus one has to check contractibility only for one Y . The
same remarks apply to the comma categories f ↓Y .
2.6. Smashing isomorphisms in categories. Recall that a connected groupoid
is equivalent, as a category, to any of its automorphism groups. Consequently,
a connected groupoid is contractible if and only if its automorphism groups are
trivial. This is the case if and only if there is exactly one isomorphism between any
two objects.
Let C be a category and G ⊂ C a subcategory which is a disjoint union of contractible groupoids. We define the quotient category C/G as follows: The objects of
C/G are equivalence classes of objects of C where we say that X ∼ Y are equivalent
if there is an isomorphism X → Y in G. Note that such an isomorphism is unique
since each component of G is contractible. We define
HomC/G [X], [Y ] := A → B in C A ∈ [X], B ∈ [Y ] ∼
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
9
where two elements (A → B) ∼ (A′ → B ′ ) in the set are defined to be equivalent
if the diagram
/B
A✤
✤
✤
✤
G∋ ✤
✤ ∈G
′
/ B′
A
commutes. Let [α : A → B] and [β : C → D] be two composable arrows, i.e. [B] =
[C], then there is a unique isomorphism γ : B → C in G and one defines
[α : A → B] ∗ [β : C → D] := [αγβ : A → D]
Set id[X] = [idX ]. One easily checks that C/G is a well-defined category.
Remark 2.5. Observe that if X → Y is an arrow in C/G and representatives X and
Y have been chosen for X and Y, then there is a unique arrow X → Y representing
X → Y.
Remark 2.6. Let X and Y be two objects in C/G. Fix some object X0 representing
X . Then the arrows X → Y in C/G are in one to one correspondence with arrows
X0 → Y in C modulo isomorphisms in G on the right. Likewise, if we fix some object
Y0 representing Y, then arrows X → Y in C/G are in one to one correspondence
with arrows X → Y0 in C modulo isomorphisms in G on the left.
Proposition 2.7. The canonical projection p : C → C/G is a homotopy equivalence.
Proof. We want to apply Quillen’s Theorem A (Theorem 2.2) to the projection
p : C → C/G. Hence, we have to show that for each object [X] in C/G the comma
category [X]↓p is contracible. Indeed, it follows with Remark 2.5 that the object
(X, id[X] ) in [X]↓p is an initial object.
In the following, this technique will be applied primarily to generalized posets:
Definition 2.8. A generalized poset is a category such that α = β whenever
α, β : A → B.
Recall that a (honest) poset is a category with at most one arrow between any
two objects (regardless of the direction of the arow). In a generalized poset C,
however, we allow objects to be uniquely isomorphic. Every subgroupoid G of a
generalized poset is a disjoint union of contractible ones and C/G is a generalized
poset again. If we collapse each connected component of the subgroupoid consisting
of all the isomorphisms, we even get a homotopy equivalent (honest) poset which
we call the underlying poset of the generalized poset.
2.7. Calculus of fractions and cancellation properties. The next definition
is very classical and due to Gabriel and Zisman [22].
Definition 2.9. Let C be a category. It satisfies the calculus of fractions if the
following two conditions are satisfied:
• (Square filling) For every pair of arrows f : B → A and g : C → A there are
arrows a : D → B and b : D → C such that af = bg.
D
a
f
b
C
/B
g
/A
10
WERNER THUMANN
• (Equalization) Whenever we have arrows f, g : A → B and a : B → C such
that f a = ga, then there exists an arrow b : D → A with bf = bg.
D
b
/A
f
g
// B
a
/C
More precisely, this is called the right calculus of fractions. There is also a dual
left calculus of fractions. Since we are mainly interested in the right calculus of
fractions, we omit the word “right”.
Remark 2.10. The existence of binary pullbacks in C trivially implies the square
filling property but it also implies the equalization property [1, Lemma 1.2]. So a
category with binary pullbacks satisfies the calculus of fractions.
The calculus of fractions has positive effects on the complexity of the fundamental
groupoid π1 (C): One can show (see e.g. [22] or [3]) that each class in π1 (C) can be
represented by a span which is a zig-zag of the form
/•
•o
•
Furthermore, two spans
•
⑧ ❅❅❅
⑧
❅❅
⑧
❅❅
⑧⑧
⑧
⑧
• _❅
•
?
❅❅
⑧⑧
❅❅
⑧
❅❅ ⑧⑧⑧
⑧
•
are homotopic if and only if the diagram can be filled in the following way:
•
⑧ O ❅❅❅
⑧
❅❅
⑧
❅❅
⑧⑧
o ⑧
⑧
/
• _❅
•
?•
❅❅
⑧
❅❅
⑧⑧
❅❅ ⑧⑧⑧
⑧
•
In other words, the elements in the localization can be described as fractions and
this explains the name of the calculus of fractions. We will frequently write (α, β)
for a span consisting of arrows α and β where the first arrow α points to the left
(i.e. is the denominator) and the second arrow β points to the right (i.e. is the
nominator). Two spans are composed by concatenating representatives to a zig-zag
and then transforming the zig-zag into a span by choosing a square filling of the
middle cospan.
•❖ ❖
♦ ♦
❖ ❖
♦
♦
❖ ❖
♦
♦
❖'/
w♦
/•o
•
•
•o
•
The canonical functor ϕ : C → π1 (C) is given by sending an arrow α to the class
represented by the span
id
α /
•o
•
•
Using the special form of the homotopy relation from above, we see that two arrows
α, β : X → Y are homotopic if and only if there is an arrow ω : A → X such that
ωα = ωβ.
We now turn to cancellation properties in categories.
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
11
Definition 2.11. Let C be a category. It is called right cancellative if f a = ga for
arrows f, g, a implies f = g. It is called left cancellative if af = ag implies f = g.
It is called cancellative if it is left and right cancellative.
Remark 2.12. Note that we have the following implications:
right cancellation =⇒ equalization
equalization + left cancellation =⇒ right cancellation
Proposition 2.13. Let C be a category satisfying the cancellative calculus of fractions. Then the canonical functor ϕ : C → π1 (C) is faithful and a homotopy equivalence.
Proof. Injectivity is easy: Let f, g be arrows in C which are mapped to the same
arrow in π1 (C). This means that f, g are homotopic. Since C satisfies the calculus of
fractions, this implies that there is an arrow ω with ωf = ωg. From the cancellation
property it follows that f = g.
For showing that the functor is a homotopy equivalence, we apply Quillen’s
Theorem A (Theorem 2.2) to the functor ϕ : C → π1 (C). Let X be an object
in π1 (C), i.e. an object in C. We have to check that the comma category X↓ϕ is
contractible. Note that this is the universal covering category UX (C). First we claim
that this category is a generalized poset: Let (Z, a) and (Z ′ , a′ ) be objects in X↓ϕ
and γ1 , γ2 be two arrows from (Z, a) to (Z ′ , a′ ). This means that Z, Z ′ are objects
in C, a : X → Z⊲ϕ and a′ : X → Z ′ ⊲ϕ are arrows in π1 (C) and γ1 , γ2 : Z → Z ′ are
arrows in C such that a ∗ (γ1 ⊲ϕ) = a′ = a ∗ (γ2 ⊲ϕ) in π1 (C). It follows γ1 ⊲ϕ = γ2 ⊲ϕ
and therefore γ1 = γ2 by injectivity.
Now we want to show that this generalized poset is cofiltered. Then we can
apply item iv) of Subsection 2.5. We have to show that for each two objects A, A′
in X↓ϕ there is another object B and arrows B → A and B → A′ . Let A = (Z, a)
and A′ = (Z ′ , a′ ) with arrows a : X → Z⊲ϕ and a′ : X → Z ′ ⊲ϕ which can be
represented by spans (α, β) and (α′ , β ′ ) respectively. Choose a square filling (γ, γ ′ )
of the cospan (α, α′ ).
Z⊲ϕ
β ②②< O✤
②② ✤
②②
✤
• c❋❋
✤
⑥
γ
❋
α ⑥
❋❋ ✤
⑥
⑥
❋
~⑥
X `❆o❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ Y✤
❆❆
①①
❆
①① ✤
α′ ❆ {①① γ ′ ✤
• ❊❊
✤
❊❊
❊❊ ✤
β′ "
Z ′ ⊲ϕ
Then the arrow ω := γα = γ ′ α′ can be interpreted as the denominator of a span
representing an arrow in π1 (C) which we denote by ω −1 . Furthermore, since ϕ : C →
π1 (C) is the identity on objects, we can write Y = Y ⊲ϕ. Thus, we can define the
object B := (Y, ω −1 ) in X↓ϕ. Finally, the arrows γβ and γ ′ β ′ give arrows B → A
and B → A′ respectively.
Remark 2.14. The functor ϕ : C → π1 (C) in Proposition 2.13 is still a homotopy
equivalence if we drop the cancellation property from the hypothesis. This is proved
in [11, Section 7].
2.8. Monoidal categories. We assume that the reader is acquainted with the definition of monoidal categories, symmetric monoidal categories and braided monoidal
categories (see e.g. [30]). In the following, we will always assume the strict versions,
12
WERNER THUMANN
i.e. the associator, right and left unitor are identities. We frequently use the symbol I to denote the unit object. Moreover, for objects X and Y , the symbol γX,Y
denotes the natural braiding isomorphism X ⊗ Y → Y ⊗ X. We will sometimes
call a monoidal category planar in order to stress that it’s neither symmetric nor
braided.
Joyal and Street introduced the notion of braided monoidal categories in [27].
It is designed such that the braided monoidal category freely generated by a single
object is the groupoid with components the braid groups Bn . More precisely,
we have an object for each natural number n, there are no morphisms n → m
with n 6= m and Hom(n, n) = Bn . More generally, they indroduced the braided
monoidal category Braid(C) freely generated by another category C [27, page 37]:
The objects are free words in the objects of C, i.e. finite sequences of objects of
C. A morphism consists of a braid β ∈ Bn where the strands are labelled with
morphisms αi : Ai → Bi of C, yielding an arrow
(β, α1 , . . . , αn ) : (A1⊲β , . . . , An⊲β ) → (B1 , . . . , Bn )
in Braid(C). Composition is performed by composing the braids and applying
composition in C to every strand. The tensor product is given by juxtaposition,
i.e. by
(β, α1 , . . . , αn ) ⊗ (β ′ , α′1 , . . . , α′n ) = β ⊗ β ′ , α1 , . . . , αn , α′1 , . . . , α′n
where β ⊗ β ′ means juxtaposition of braids. A set C can be viewed as a discrete
category, so we also obtain the notion of a braided monoidal category Braid(C)
freely generated by a set. The arrows are just braids with strands labelled by the
elements of C, i.e. are colored.
The same remarks apply to the symmetric version. In particular, a category C
freely generates a symmetric monoidal category Sym(C).
Even simpler, we can form the free monoidal category Mon(C) generated by a
category C. The strands are decorated by arrows in C but they are not allowed to
braid or cross each other.
If C is a (symmetric/braided) monoidal category, then there is exactly one tensor
structure on π1 (C) making it into a (symmetric/braided) monoidal category and
such that the canonical functor ϕ : C → π1 (C) respects that structure, i.e.
ϕ(X ⊗ Y )
ϕ(α ⊗ β)
ϕ(I)
ϕ(γX,Y )
= ϕ(X) ⊗ ϕ(Y )
= ϕ(α) ⊗ ϕ(β)
= I
= γϕ(X),ϕ(Y )
for objects X, Y and arrows α, β. The tensor product on the level of arrows can be
constructed as follows: Let one arrow be represented by the zig-zag
A0
α
1
←−
A1
α
2
−→
···
α
k
−−→
Ak
and the other arrow by the zig-zag
B0
β1
−→ B1
β2
←−
···
βl
−→ Bl
Then the tensor product may be represented by the zig-zag
α
A0
⊗
1
←−
⊗
B0
←−
id
α
A1
⊗
2
−→
···
⊗ ···
B0
−→
id
···
α
k
−−→
Ak
⊗
⊗
id
−→
B0
id
−→
⊗
β1
−→
id
Ak
⊗
←−
⊗
B1
←−
β2
id
···
···
−→
⊗
···
−→
βl
Ak
⊗
Bl
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
13
2.9. Cones and joins. Let C, D be two categories. We define the join C ∗ D. The
set of objects of C ∗ D is the disjoint union of the objects of C and D. The set of
arrows is the disjoint union of the arrows of C and D together with exactly one arrow
C → D for each pair (C, D) of objects C of C and D of D. The composition rules are
the unique ones extending the compositions in C and D. The classifying space of the
join is homotopy equivalent to the join of the classifying spaces B(C ∗D) ≃ BC ∗BD.
Now we define the cone over a category. The objects of Cone(C) are the objects
of C plus another object called tip. The arrows are the arrows of C together with
exactly one arrow from tip to every object in C. Dually, there is a Cocone(C) over
C. In the cocone, the extra arrows go from the objects of C to the extra object tip.
Last but not least, when we have a join C ∗ D of two categories, there is a mixed
version Coone(C ∗ D) which we call the coone over the join. Again, there is one
extra object tip and for every object in C ∗ D we have an extra arrow. When we
have an object in C, the extra arrow goes to tip. When we have an arrow in D,
the extra arrow comes from tip. The composition of an arrow C → tip with an
arrow tip → D is the unique arrow C → D from the definition of the join. All
three coning versions give the usual conings on the topological level:
B(Cone(C))
B(Cocone(C))
B(Coone(C ∗ D))
∼
=
∼
=
∼
=
Cone(B(C))
Cone(B(C))
Cone(B(C ∗ D))
The join of two spaces X and Y is defined to be the homotopy pushout of the two
projections X ← X × Y → Y . Thus, it is defined only up to homotopy and there
is some freedom to choose models of a join. Indeed, there is another construction
giving the join of two categories. For this, we need to recall the Grothendieck
construction: Let J be some indexing categoryRand F : J → CAT a diagram in CAT.
The objects of the Grothendieck construction F are pairs (J, X) of objects J in
J and X in J⊲F . An arrow from (J, X) to (J ′ , X ′ ) is a pair (f, α) consisting of an
arrow f : J → J ′ and an arrow α : X⊲(f ⊲F ) → X ′ . Composition is given by
(f, α) ∗ (f ′ , α′ ) := f ∗ f ′ , α⊲(f ′ ⊲F ) ∗ α′
In [40] it is shown that there is a model structure on CAT Quillen equivalent to SSET,
nowadays called the Thomason model Rstructure, and in [41] it is shown that the
nerve of the Grothendieck construction F is homotopy equivalent to the homotopy
pushout of the diagram F R∗ N which is obtained from the diagram F by applying
the nerve functor. In fact, F realizes the homotopy pushout of F with respect to
the Thomason model structure on CAT [19, Section 3].
Now let C, D be categories. We call the Grothendieck construction of the diagram
pr
pr
C
D
C ←−−
C × D −−→
D
the Grothendieck join of C and D and denote it by C ◦ D. From [41] we know that
B(C ◦ D) is homotopy equivalent to the homotopy pushout of the diagram
pr
pr
BC ←−BC
−− BC × BD −−BD
−→ BD
But the latter is the join BC ∗ BD by definition. So we have B(C ◦ D) ≃ BC ∗ BD.
One can show that the Grothendieck join is associative and thus we can write
C1 ◦ . . . ◦ Ck for a finite collection Ci of categories. The objects of such an iterated
Grothendieck join are elements of the set
a
Y
obj(C1 ◦ . . . ◦ Ck ) =
obj(Cs )
S⊂{1,...,k} s∈S
14
WERNER THUMANN
Whenever we have S ⊂ T ⊂ {1, . . . , k}, objects (Yt )t∈T and (Xs )s∈S and arrows
αs : Ys → Xs in Cs for each s ∈ S, then there is an arrow
(αs )s∈S : (Yt )t∈T → (Xs )s∈S
For R ⊂ S ⊂ T the composition is given by
(αs )s∈S ∗ (βr )r∈R = (αr ∗ βr )r∈R
There is also a dual notion of the Grothendieck join which we define as
C • D := (C op ◦ Dop )op
Since B(Aop ) = B(A) for any category, we still have B(C • D) ≃ BC ∗ BD. Furthermore, it is still associative, so that we can write C1 • . . . • Ck for a finite collection Ci
of categories. The objects of such an iterated dual Grothendieck join are elements
of the set
a
Y
obj(C1 • . . . • Ck ) =
obj(Cs )
S⊂{1,...,k} s∈S
Whenever we have S ⊂ T ⊂ {1, . . . , k}, objects (Xs )s∈S and (Yt )t∈T and arrows
αs : Xs → Ys in Cs for each s ∈ S, then there is an arrow
(αs )s∈S : (Xs )s∈S → (Yt )t∈T
For R ⊂ S ⊂ T the composition is given by
(βr )r∈R ∗ (αs )s∈S = (βr ∗ αr )r∈R
2.10. The Morse method for categories. We first recall the Morse method
in the case of simplicial complexes which has been used in [2] to prove finiteness
properties of certain groups. We then explain the same method in the context of
categories.
Let C be a simplicial complex. Let v be a vertex in C. Denote by C −v the full
subcomplex spanned by the vertices of C except v. Observe the link lk(v) of v in C
which is contained in C −v . We then have a canonical pushout diagram
/ Cone lk(v)
lk(v)
C −v
/C
where Cone lk(v) denotes the simplicial cone over lk(v). The following lemma
expresses the connectivity of the pair (C, C −v ) in terms of the connectivity of lk(v).
Lemma 2.15. Let X and L be two spaces and L → C a cofibration into a contractible space C. Let
/C
L
/Z
X
be a pushout of spaces. If L is (n−1)-connected, then the pair (Z, X) is n-connected.
The proof is a standard application of the Seifert–van Kampen theorem, the
Hurewicz theorem and the Mayer–Vietoris sequence for pushouts.
More generally, let X0 be the full subcomplex of the simplicial complex X
spanned by a subset of vertices. Then X can be built up from X0 by successively adding vertices. We thus get a filtration X0 ⊂ X1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ X of X by full
subcomplexes. If v is the vertex in Xi which is not contained in Xi−1 , then we
define
lk↓ (v) := lkXi (v) = lkX (v) ∩ Xi−1
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
15
to be the descending link of v. If all the descending links appearing this way are
highly connected, then also the pair (X , X0 ) will be highly connected and, using
the long exact homotopy sequence, we obtain the following:
Proposition 2.16. Let x0 ∈ X0 be a point. Assume that each descending link is
n-connected. Then, we have
πk (X0 , x0 ) ∼
= πk (X , x0 )
for k = 0, . . . , n.
Note that, in general, the descending links depend on the order in which the
vertices are added. We call two vertices v1 , v2 in X \ X0 independent if they are not
joined by an edge in X . Assume now that we want to add v1 and then v2 at some
step of the process. The independence condition ensures that the descending links
of v1 and v2 do not depend on the order in which v1 and v2 are added.
The adding order is often encoded in a Morse function. This is a function f
assigning to each vertex in X \ X0 an element in a totally ordered set, e.g. N. We
require that vertices with the same f -value are pairwise independent. We then
add vertices in order of ascending f -values. Because of the independence property, the adding order of vertices with the same f -value can be chosen arbitrarily.
Alternatively, we can add vertices with the same f -value all at once.
We now give a version of this concept for categories. Let C be a category and X
an object in C with HomC (X, X) = {idX }. Define C −X to be the full subcategory
of C spanned by the objects of C except X. We define
lk↓ (X) := C −X ↓X
to be the descending up link of X and
lk↓ (X) := X↓C −X
to be the descending down link of X. Furthermore, define
lk↓ (X) := lk↓ (X) ∗ lk↓ (X)
to be the descending link of X.
We have a commutative diagram D as follows:
lk↓ (X)
/ Coone lk↓ (X) ∗ lk (X)
↓
C −X
/C
The horizontal arrows are the obvious inclusions. We explain the vertical arrows,
starting with
lk ↓ (X) ∗ lk↓ (X) → C −X
An object either comes from lk↓ (X) and thus is a pair (Y, Y → X) with Y an
object in C −X or comes from lk↓ (X) and thus is a pair (Y, X → Y ) with Y an
object in C −X . In both cases, the object will be sent to Y . Similarly, on the level of
arrows, it is also the canonical projection from lk↓ (X) or lk ↓ (X) to C −X . However,
for each object (Y, Y → X) in lk↓ (X) and each object (Y ′ , X → Y ′ ) in lk ↓ (X),
there is another unique arrow in the join. Send this arrow to the composed arrow
Y → X → Y ′ . Next, we will define the arrow
Coone lk↓ (X) ∗ lk↓ (X) → C
Of course, in order to make the diagram commutative, this functor restricted to
the base lk↓ (X) of the coone is the one already defined above. So we have to define
the images of the extra object tip and the extra arrows. Send tip to X. Let
16
WERNER THUMANN
(Y, Y → X) be an object of lk↓ (X). The arrow from this object to tip is sent to
the arrow Y → X. Similarly, let (Y, X → Y ) be an object of lk↓ (X). Then the
arrow from tip to this object is sent to the arrow X → Y .
Our goal is to show that the diagram D becomes a pushout on the level of
classifying spaces. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Consider for example
the groupoid • ⇄ • with two objects and two non-identity arrows which are inverse
to each other. In all these cases, however, the situation is even better:
Lemma 2.17. Assume that there is an object A 6= X and arrows α : X → A and
β : A → X. Then the inclusion C −X → C is a homotopy equivalence.
Proof. We show that C −X ↓X is filtered and thus contractible. The lemma then
follows from Theorem 2.2 and Remark 2.3. Let (Y, γ) be an object in C −X ↓X,
i.e. γ : Y → X is an arrow in C with Y an object in C −X . Set ǫ := γα. Because of
the assumption HomC (X, X) = {idX }, the arrow αβ : X → X must be the identity.
Then we calculate
γ = γ(αβ) = (γα)β = ǫβ
This shows that ǫ represents an arrow (Y, γ) → (A, β) in C −X ↓X. In particular,
for every two objects in the comma category, there are arrows to the object (A, β).
This shows the first property of a filtered category.
For the second property, we have to show that any two parallel arrows are coequalized by another arrow. So let (Z, ν) and (Y, γ) be two objects and ǫ, ǫ′ : (Z, ν) →
(Y, γ) be two arrows, i.e. ǫ, ǫ′ : Z → Y are arrows in C −X and we have ǫγ = ν = ǫ′ γ.
Set µ = γα which is an arrow (Y, γ) → (A, β) as already pointed out. Then we
calculate
ǫµ = ǫγα = να = ǫ′ γα = ǫ′ µ
and we are done.
In all other cases, diagram D is indeed a pushout on the level of classifying
spaces:
Lemma 2.18. Assume that for any object A 6= X either there are only arrows from
X to A or there are only arrows from A to X, but never both. Then the diagram
B(D)
/ Cone B lk↓ X
B lk↓ X
B C −X
/ B(C)
is a pushout of spaces.
Proof. We claim that the nerve functor applied to the diagram D
/ N Coone lk↓ X ∗ lk↓ X
N lk↓ X
N C −X
/ N (C)
yields a pushout in SSET. Since the geometric realization functor |?| : SSET →
TOP is left adjoint to the singular simplex functor, it preserves all colimits and in
particular all pushouts. Therefore, applying the geometric realization functor |?| to
the diagram N (D), we obtain a pushout in TOP, as claimed in the lemma.
A simplex in N (C) is just a string of composable arrows A0 → . . . → Ak . One
can easily deduce from the assumption that whenever there are two occurences of
X in such a string of composable arrows, then there cannot be objects different
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
17
from X in between. In other words, if X occurs at all, then all the X in the string
are contained in a maximal substring of the form X → X → . . . → X where all the
arrows are (necessarily) idX .
Assume now that we have a commutative diagram as follows:
/ N Coone lk↓ X ∗ lk↓ X
N lk↓ X
❇❇
❇❇
❇❇
❇❇
❇❇f
−X
/
❇❇
N C
N (C) ◗
❨❨❨❨❨❨❨
❇
❨❨❨❨❨❨
◗
◗ ◗h ❇❇❇
❨❨❨❨❨❨
❨❨❨❨❨❨
◗ ❇❇
❨❨❨❨❨❨
g
❨❨❨❨❨❨◗ ◗ ❇◗❇
❨❨❨❨,(
Z
We will show that h is uniquely determined by f and g. Assume σ is a simplex
in N (C) given by a string of composable arrows A0 → . . . → Ak . If all the Ai are
−X
contained
then σ is a simplex in the simplicial subset
in the full subcategory C
−X
N C
and then necessarily h(σ) = g(σ). On the other hand, assume that not
all the Ai are objects of C −X , i.e. at least one Ai = X. As pointed out above, σ
must be of the form
B0 → . . . → Br → X → . . . → X → C0 → . . . → Cs
where Bi 6= X for all i = 0, . . . , r and Cj 6= X for all j = 0, . . . , s. All the Bi
are in the image of lk↓ (X) because, after composing, we get an arrow Bi → X.
Analogously, all the Cj are in the image of lk↓ (X). Such a simplex σ always lifts
to a unique simplex σ̄ along the map
N Coone lk ↓ X ∗ lk ↓ X → N (C)
Thus we have h(σ) = f (σ̄). This proves uniqueness of h. Showing that h actually
defines a map of simplicial sets is left to the reader.
We combine Lemmas 2.15, 2.17 and 2.18 to get:
Proposition 2.19. If the descending link lk↓ (X) is (n − 1)-connected, then the
pair (C, C −X ) is n-connected.
More generally, let X0 be the full subcategory of the category X spanned by a
collection of objects in X . Assume that HomX (X, X) = {idX } for all objects X
in X \ X0 . Then X can be built up from X0 by successively adding objects. If all
the descending links appearing this way are highly connected, then also the pair
(X , X0 ) will be highly connected and, using the long exact homotopy sequence, we
obtain the following:
Theorem 2.20. Let x0 ∈ X0 be an object. Assume that each descending link is
n-connected. Then, we have
∼ πk (X , x0 )
πk (X0 , x0 ) =
for k = 0, . . . , n.
We say that two objects x1 and x2 in X \ X0 are independent if there are no
arrows x1 → x2 or x2 → x1 in X . This guarantees independence of lk↓ (x1 ) and
lk↓ (x2 ) from the adding order of x1 and x2 .
Again, we can encode the adding order with the help of a Morse function f which
assigns to each object in X \ X0 an element in a totally ordered set, e.g. N. We
require that objects with the same f -value are pairwise independent and we add
objects in order of increasing f -values.
18
WERNER THUMANN
3. Operad groups
In this section, we want to introduce our main objects of study, the operad
groups. We first define the types of operads we will be working with. We will then
define operad groups to be the fundamental groups of the category of operators
naturally associated to operads. In the last subsection, we will discuss examples
of operads and their corresponding operad groups. We will recover some already
well-known Thompson-like groups this way.
3.1. Basic definitions.
Definition 3.1. An operad O consists of a set of colors C and sets of operations
O(a1 , . . . , an ; b) for each finite ordered sequence a1 , . . . , an , b of colors in C (the ai
are the input colors and b is the output color) with n ≥ 1 (allowing operations
with no inputs is possible, but we won’t consider such operads). See Figure 1 for a
visualization of operations. There are composition maps (Figure 1)
O(c11 , . . . , c1k1 ; a1 ) × . . . × O(cn1 , . . . , cnkn ; an ) × O(a1 , . . . , an ; b)
O(c11 , . . . , c1k1 , c21 , . . . , cnkn ; b)
denoted by (φ1 , . . . , φn ) ∗ θ. Composition is associative (Figure 2):
(ψ11 , . . . , ψ1k1 ) ∗ φ1 , . . . , (ψn1 , . . . , ψnkn ) ∗ φn ∗ θ
k
(ψ11 , . . . , ψ1k1 , ψ21 , . . . , ψnkn ) ∗ (φ1 , . . . , φn ) ∗ θ
For each color a there are distinguished unit elements 1a ∈ O(a; a) such that
(1a1 , . . . , 1an ) ∗ θ = θ = θ ∗ 1b
for each operation θ. Sometimes we call such an operad planar in order to distinguish it from the symmetric or braided versions below.
A symmetric/braided operad comes with additional maps (Figure 3)
x · : O(a1 , . . . , an ; b) → O(a1⊲x , . . . , an⊲x ; b)
for each x in the symmetric group Sn or in the braid group Bn respectively. Here,
i⊲x for x ∈ Sn means plugging the element i into the permutation x which is
considered as a bijection of the set {1, . . . , n}. There is a canonical projection
Bn → Sn , so this makes sense also in the braided case. These maps are assumed
to be actions:
x · (y · θ) = (xy) · θ
1·θ =θ
They also have to be equivariant with respect to composition (Figure 4):
(φ1⊲x , . . . , φn⊲x ) ∗ (x · θ) = x̄ · (φ1 , . . . , φn ) ∗ θ
(y1 · φ1 , . . . , yn · φn ) ∗ θ = (y1 , . . . , yn ) · (φ1 , . . . , φn ) ∗ θ
Here, x̄ is obtained from x by replacing the i’th strand of x by ni strands and ni is
the number of inputs of φi⊲x . Furthermore, (y1 , . . . , yn ) is the juxtaposition of the
permutations resp. braidings yi .
Remark 3.2. There is an equivalent way of writing the composition, namely with
so-called partial compositions. The i’th partial compositions
∗i : O(c1 , . . . , ck ; ai ) × O(a1 , . . . , an ; b) → O(a1 , . . . , ai−1 , c1 , . . . , ck , ai+1 , . . . , an ; b)
are defined as
φ ∗i θ := 1a1 , . . . , 1ai−1 , φ, 1ai+1 , . . . , 1an ∗ θ
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
c11
c12
a1
a2
θ
a3
a1
φ1
c21
c31
c32
c33
b
19
a2
φ2
θ
b
a3
φ3
Figure 1. Visualization of an operation and composition of operations.
ψ11
φ1
ψ21
θ
φ2
ψ22
ψ11
φ1
ψ21
θ
φ2
ψ22
Figure 2. Associativity.
aa22
a3
aa11
a1
a2
a3
θ
b
Figure 3. Action of the braid groups on the operations.
φ1
φ2
φ3
θ
φ2
θ
φ3
φ1
φ1
φ1
φ2
φ3
θ
φ2
φ3
Figure 4. First and second equivariance property.
θ
20
WERNER THUMANN
φ1
φ2
φ3
Figure 5. Arrow in S(O).
Conversely, one could define operads via partial compositions and obtain the usual
composition from successive partial compositions.
The planar operads, symmetric operads and braided operads can be organized
into categories OP, SYM.OP and BRA.OP respectively. Denote by MON, SYM.MON and
BRA.MON the categories of monoidal categories, symmetric monoidal categories and
braided monoidal categories respectively. There are functors
End : MON −→ OP
End : SYM.MON −→ SYM.OP
End : BRA.MON −→ BRA.OP
assigning to each (symmetric/braided) monoidal category C an operad End(C),
called the endomorphism operad. The colors of End(C) are the objects of C and
the sets of operations are given by
End(C)(a1 , . . . , an ; b) = HomC (a1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ an , b)
Composition in End(C) is induced by the composition in C in the obvious way. The
unit element in End(C)(a; a) is the identity ida : a → a in C. In the symmetric or
braided case, C comes with additional natural isomorphisms γX,Y : X ⊗Y → Y ⊗X.
These can be used to define the action of the symmetric resp. braid groups on the
sets of operations. In the theory of operads, these endomorphism operads play an
important role since morphisms of operads
O → End(C)
are representations of or algebras over the operad O.
The functors End have left adjoints
S : OP −→ MON
S : SYM.OP −→ SYM.MON
S : BRA.OP −→ BRA.MON
The (symmetric/braided) monoidal category S(O) is called the category of operators. We will define these categories explicitly. We start with the planar case and
then use it to define the braided case. The symmetric case is similar to the braided
case.
So let O be a planar operad with a set of colors C. The objects of S(O) are free
words in the colors, i.e. finite sequences of colors in C. An arrow in S(O) is a finite
sequence of operations in O: If X1 , . . . , Xn are operations in O, the (ordered) input
colors of Xi are (c1i , . . . , cki i ) and the output color of Xi is di , then the Xi give an
arrow
(X1 , . . . , Xn ) : (c11 , . . . , ck11 , c12 , . . . , cknn ) → (d1 , . . . , dn )
in S(O). Composition is induced by the composition in the operad O and the
identities are given by the identity operations in O. The tensor product is given by
juxtaposition.
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
21
φ1
φ2
φ3
φ1
φ2
φ3
φ1
φ2
φ3
Figure 6. Equivalence in S(O).
Now let O be a braided operad with set of colors C. By forgetting the action
of the braid groups, we get a planar operad Opl . The braided monoidal category
S(O) is a certain product Braid(C) ⊠ S(Opl ). The objects of S(O) are once more
finite sequences of colors in C. Arrows in S(O) are equivalence classes of pairs
(β, X) ∈ Braid(C) × S(Opl ) consisting of a C-colored braid β and a sequence
X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ) of operations of O where the codomain of β equals the domain
of X (Figure 5). The equivalence relation on such pairs is the following: Let (β, X)
be such a pair with X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ). For each i = 1, . . . , n let σi be a C-colored
braid such that σi · Xi is defined. Let σ := σ1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ σn and define
σ · (β, X) := β ∗ σ −1 , (σ1 · X1 , . . . , σn · Xn )
We require (β, X) and (β ′ , X ′ ) to be equivalent if there exists a σ as above such
that (β ′ , X ′ ) = σ · (β, X). In other words, it is the smallest equivalence relation
respecting juxtaposition and which is generated by the relation
(β ∗ σ, X) ∼ (β, σ · X)
with X a single operation. This is visualized in Figure 6.
Composition in S(O) is defined on representatives (β, X) and (δ, Y ). Loosely
speaking, we push the sequence X of operations through the colored braid δ just
as in the definition of equivariance for operads, obtain another colored braid Xyδ
which is obtained from δ by multiplying the strands according to X and another
sequence of operations Xxδ which is obtained from X by permuting the operations
according to δ, and finally compose the left and right side in Braid(C) and S(Opl )
22
WERNER THUMANN
φ1
ψ1
φ2
ψ2
φ3
φ1
ψ1
φ3
φ2
φ1
ψ2
ψ1
φ3
φ2
ψ2
Figure 7. Composition in S(O).
respectively:
(β, X) ∗ (δ, Y ) := β ∗ Xyδ, Xxδ ∗ Y
See Figure 7 for a visualization of this procedure. That this definition is independent
of the chosen representatives follows from the equivariance properties of operads.
Last but not least, the tensor product is defined on representatives (β, X) and
(δ, Y ) via juxtaposition, i.e. (β, X) ⊗ (δ, Y ) := (β ⊗ δ, X ⊗ Y ). The identity arrows
are those represented by a pair of identities.
Definition 3.3. The degree of an operation is its number of inputs. The degree of
an object in S(O) is the length of the corresponding color word. The degree of an
arrow in S(O) is the degree of its domain. A higher degree operation resp. object
resp. arrow is one with degree at least 2.
Definition 3.4. Let O be a planar, symmetric or braided operad and let X be an
object in S(O). Then the group
π1 (O, X) := π1 S(O), X
is called the operad group associated to O based at X.
3.2. Normal forms. In case O is a planar operad, arrows in S(O) are just tensor
products of operations. In the symmetric and braided case, however, arrows are
equivalence classes of pairs (β, X). In this subsection, we want to give a normal
form of such arrows, i.e. canonical representatives (β, X). We will treat the braided
case, the symmetric case is similar and simpler.
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
23
Consider a colored braid β with n strands. The i’th strand is the strand starting
from the node with index i ∈ {1, . . . , n}. Let S be a subset of the index set
{1, . . . , n}. Deleting all strands in β other than those with an index in S yields
another colored braid β|S . We say that β is unbraided on S if β|S is trivial.
Let (n1 , . . . , nk ) be a sequence of natural numbers with 1 = n1 < n2 < . . . <
nk = n + 1. A sequence like this is called a partition of n, denoted by [n1 , . . . , nk ],
because the sets Si := {ni , . . . , ni+1 − 1} form a partition of the set {1, . . . , n}. We
say β is unbraided with respect to the partition [n1 , . . . , nk ] if it is unbraided on
the sets Si .
Lemma 3.5. Let [n1 , . . . , nk ] be a partition of n and β a colored braid with n
strands. Then there is a unique decomposition β = βp ∗ βu into colored braids βp
and βu such that βp = βp1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ βpk−1 is a tensor product of colored braids βpi with
|Si | strands and βu is unbraided with respect to [n1 , . . . , nk ].
Proof. Define βpi := β|Si and
−1
βu := β|−1
S1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ β|Sk−1 ∗ β
Then we have β = βp ∗ βu and βu is unbraided with respect to [n1 , . . . , nk ]. The
uniqueness statement is left to the reader.
Now let [β, X] be an arrow in S(O) with X = (X1 , . . . , Xk ). Assume deg(Xi ) =
Pi−1
di and d1 + . . . + dk = n. Define ni = 1 + j=1 dj for i = 1, . . . , k + 1 and observe
the partition [n1 , . . . , nk+1 ]. Decompose the colored braid β −1 as in the previous
lemma to obtain β = τ ∗ ρ where τ −1 is unbraided with respect to [n1 , . . . , nk+1 ]
and ρ = ρ1 ⊗ . . .⊗ ρk is a tensor product of colored braids ρi with di strands. Define
Yi = ρi · Xi . Then from the definition of arrows in S(O) it follows that
[β, X] = [τ, Y ]
with Y = (Y1 , . . . , Yk ). So each arrow has a representative (τ, Y ) such that τ −1
is unbraided in the ranges defined by the domains of the operations in the second
component. It is easy to see that there is at most one such pair.
Similarly, in the symmetric case, for each arrow in S(O), there is a unique
representative (τ, Y ) such that the colored permutation τ −1 is unpermuted on the
domains of the operations in the second component.
Definition 3.6. The unique representative (τ, Y ) of an arrow in S(O) with τ −1
unpermuted resp. unbraided on the domains of the operations in Y is called the
normal form of that arrow.
3.3. Calculus of fractions and cancellation properties. In the following, we
write θ ≈ ψ if two operations θ, ψ in an operad are equivalent modulo the action of
the symmetric resp. braid groups, i.e. there exists a permutation resp. braid γ such
that θ = γ · ψ. Of course, in the planar case, this just means equality of operations.
Definition 3.7. Let O be a (symmetric/braided) operad. We say that O satisfies
the calculus of fractions if the following two conditions are satisfied:
• (Square filling) For every pair of operations θ1 and θ2 with the same output
color, there are sequences of operations Ψ1 = (ψ11 , . . . , ψ1k1 ) and Ψ2 =
(ψ21 , . . . , ψ2k2 ) such that Ψi ∗ θi is defined for i = 1, 2 and such that Ψ1 ∗ θ1 ≈
Ψ 2 ∗ θ2 .
• (Equalization) Assume we have an operation θ and sequences of operations
Ψ1 = (ψ11 , . . . , ψ1k ) and Ψ2 = (ψ21 , . . . , ψ2k ) such that Ψ1 ∗θ ≈ Ψ2 ∗θ, i.e. there
is a γ with Ψ1 ∗θ = γ ·(Ψ2 ∗θ). Then γ is already of the form γ = γ1 ⊗. . .⊗γk
24
WERNER THUMANN
such that γj · ψ2j is defined for each j = 1, . . . , k and there is a sequence of
operations Ξj for each j = 1, . . . , k such that Ξj ∗ ψ1j = Ξj ∗ (γj · ψ2j ).
Definition 3.8. Let O be a (symmetric/braided) operad. We define right cancellativity and left cancellativity for O as follows:
• (Right cancellativity) Assume we have an operation θ and sequences of
operations Ψ1 = (ψ11 , . . . , ψ1k ) and Ψ2 = (ψ21 , . . . , ψ2k ) such that Ψ1 ∗ θ ≈
Ψ2 ∗ θ, i.e. there is a γ with Ψ1 ∗ θ = γ · (Ψ2 ∗ θ). Then γ is already of the
form γ = γ1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ γk such that γj · ψ2j is defined and equal to ψ1j for each
j = 1, . . . , k.
• (Left cancellativity) Assume we have operations θ1 and θ2 and a sequence
of operations Ψ such that Ψ ∗ θ1 = Ψ ∗ θ2 . Then θ1 = θ2 .
We say that O is cancellative if it is both left and right cancellative.
These two definitions are designed such that the following two propositions hold.
The proofs are straightforward and left to the reader (see also [42]).
Proposition 3.9. O satisfies the calculus of fractions if and only if S(O) does.
Proposition 3.10. O satisfies the left resp. right cancellation property if and only
if S(O) does.
3.4. Operads with transformations. Observe that the colors of an operad O
together with the degree 1 operations form a category I(O). In general, this category could be any category. Thus, to prove certain theorems, it is often necessary
to impose restrictions on the degree 1 operations.
Definition 3.11. A planar resp. symmetric resp. braided operad O is called a
planar resp. symmetric resp. braided operad with transformations if the category
I(O) is a groupoid. In other words, all the degree 1 operations are invertible.
For such an operad, a transformation is an arrow in S(O) of the form [σ, X] where
X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ) is a sequence of operations of degree 1. The transformations form
a groupoid which we call T (O).
We say that two operations θ1 and θ2 are transformation equivalent if there is a
transformation α such that θ2 = α ∗ θ1 . We denote by T C(O) the set of equivalence
classes of operations modulo transformation. Note that two transformation equivalent operations have the same degree. Thus, we also have a notion of degree for
elements in T C(O). We define a partial order on the set T C(O) as follows: Write
Θ1 ≤ Θ2 if there is an operation θ1 with [θ1 ] = Θ1 and operations ψ1 , . . . , ψn such
that (ψ1 , . . . , ψn ) ∗ θ1 ∈ Θ2 . Then, for every θ1 with [θ1 ] = Θ1 there are operations
ψ1 , . . . , ψn such that (ψ1 , . . . , ψn )∗θ1 ∈ Θ2 . It is not hard to prove that this relation
is indeed a partial order. Note that the degree function on T C(O) strictly respects
this order relation which means
Θ1 < Θ2
=⇒
deg(Θ1 ) < deg(Θ2 )
The following observation, which easily follows from the definitions, reinterpretes
the square filling property of Definition 3.7 in terms of the poset T C(O) of transformation classes:
Observation 3.12. Let O be a (symmetric/braided) operad with transformations.
Then O satisfies the square filling property if and only if for each pair Θ1 , Θ2 of
transformation classes with the same codomain color there is another transformation class Θ with Θ1 ≤ Θ ≥ Θ2 .
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
25
3.4.1. Spines in graded posets. We call a poset P graded if there is degree function
deg : P → N such that deg(x) < deg(y) whenever x < y. For example, T C(O)
above is graded.
Definition 3.13. Let P be a graded poset and M ⊂ P be the subset of minimal
elements in P . The spine S of P is the smallest subset S ⊂ P such that M ⊂ S
and which satisfies the following property: Whenever v ∈ P \ S, then there is a
greatest element g ∈ S such that g < v.
We want to prove that the spine of a graded poset always exists.
Construction 3.14. We define Si ⊂ P for i ∈ {0, 1, 2, . . .} inductively. Set S0 =
M . Assume that Si has been constructed. For each pair x, y ∈ Si with x 6= y,
define Mi+1 (x, y) ⊂ P to be the set consisting of all the minimal elements z with
the property
x ≤ z ≥ y. Now, let Si+1 be the union of all the Mi+1 (x, y). Finally,
S∞
define S = i=0 Si .
In the following, we want to show that this S satisfies the defining properties of
the spine of P .
Observation 3.15. Let A ⊂ P . Assume that v ∈ P satisfies a < v for all a ∈ A. We
claim that there is a minimal element p in the set {z ∈ P | ∀a∈A a ≤ z} which also
satisfies p ≤ v. If v is already minimal, then we can set p = v. If it is not minimal,
there must be another element v ′ ∈ P with a ≤ v ′ < v for all a ∈ A. Then v ′ has
strictly smaller degree than v. If we repeat this argument with v ′ , we have to end
up with a minimal element p at some time, because the degree function is bounded
below. This p surely satisfies p ≤ v.
Let v ∈ P \ S. We want to find the greatest element in the set
V := {z ∈ S | z < v}
Si↓
For each i, set
= Si ∩ V . We claim: There exists exactly one i0 such that
|Sj↓ | > 1 for j < i0 , |Si↓0 | = 1 and Sj↓ = ∅ for j > i0 and the unique element in Si↓0
is the greatest element in V .
Observation 3.15 applied to A = ∅ reveals that S0↓ 6= ∅. Note that either all but
finitely many of the Si are empty or the sequence of numbers
di := min{deg(z) | z ∈ Si }
tends to infinity. But the degree of all the elements in all the Si↓ is bounded by
deg(v). It follows that in any case there must be an i0 such that Sj↓ = ∅ for all
j > i0 . Choose the i0 which is minimal with respect to this property, i.e. Si↓0 6= ∅.
Assume |Si↓0 | > 1 and let x 6= y be two elements in this set. Write A = {x, y}
and recall that x, y < v. Thus, by Observation 3.15, we know that there must be
a p ∈ Mi0 +1 (x, y) with p ≤ v. Since v 6∈ S, we have indeed p < v. Consequently,
p ∈ Si↓0 +1 , a contradiction. So we have indeed |Si↓0 | = 1. Next, observe that for
any j, if Sj 6= ∅, then Sj−1 consists of at least two elements. This follows directly
from the definitions. Consequently, the same holds for the Sj↓ . From this, it easily
follows |Sj↓ | > 1 for j < i0 .
We now use this to prove that the unique element g ∈ Si↓0 is the greatest element
in V , i.e. x ≤ g whenever x ∈ S with x < v. Let x be such an element. If x 6= g,
then there must be some j < i0 such that x ∈ Sj↓ . There is another element x′
↓
in this Sj↓ . Observation 3.15 applied to A = {x, x′ } shows that there is p ∈ Sj+1
with x ≤ p. If j + 1 = i0 , that p must be g and we are done. Else, we repeat this
process with p in place of x until we reach level i0 . This completes the proof that
S satisfies the last property in Definition 3.13.
26
WERNER THUMANN
Remains to prove that S is the smallest subset containing M and satisfying
this property. So let S ′ ⊂ P be another subset containing M and satisfying this
property. We have to show S ⊂ S ′ . We will prove Si ⊂ S ′ by induction over i. The
induction start is trivial because S0 = M . For the induction step, assume Si ⊂ S ′ .
Let v ∈ Si+1 . Assume that v 6∈ S ′ . Then there is a greatest element p ∈ S ′ with
p < v. Furthermore, there must be x, y ∈ Si with x 6= y and v ∈ Mi+1 (x, y). This
means that v is minimal with respect to x ≤ v ≥ y. Since x, y ∈ S ′ but v 6∈ S ′ we
have indeed x < v > y. Since p is the greatest element in S ′ with p < v, we obtain
x ≤ p ≥ y. This contradicts the minimality of v. So we must have v ∈ S ′ and thus
Si+1 ⊂ S ′ .
3.4.2. Elementary and very elementary operations. Denote by T C ∗ (O) the full subposet of T C(O) spanned by the higher degree classes (i.e. the elements of degree at
least 2).
Definition 3.16. Let O be a (symmetric/braided) operad with transformations.
The minimal elements in T C ∗ (O) are called very elementary transformation classes.
Denote the set of very elementary classes by V E.
Let Θ, Θ1 , . . . , Θk ∈ T C(O) be (not necessarily distinct) transformation classes.
We say that Θ is decomposable into the classes Θi if we find operations θi ∈ Θi for
i = 1, . . . , k which can be partially composed (see Remark 3.2) in a certain way to
an operation in Θ. It can be shown that any class in T C ∗ (O) decomposes into very
elementary classes.
Definition 3.17. Let O be a (symmetric/braided) operad with transformations.
The elements in the spine of T C ∗ (O) are called elementary transformation classes.
Denote the set of elementary classes by E.
An operation in O is called (very) elementary if it is contained in a (very) elementary transformation class. We will call the elementary but not very elementary
classes resp. operations strictly elementary.
Definition 3.18. O is finitely generated if there are only finitely many very elementary transformation classes. It is of finite type if there are only finitely many
elementary transformation classes.
The following proposition states that the subsets V E and E are invariant under
the right action of degree 1 operations.
Proposition 3.19. Let O be a (symmetric/braided) operad with transformations.
Let θ be a higher degree operation and γ be a degree 1 operation. Then the transformation class [θ] is (very) elementary if and only if the class [θ] ∗ γ := [θ ∗ γ] is
(very) elementary. In particular, the operation θ is (very) elementary if and only
if θ ∗ γ is (very) elementary.
Proof. The main observation is that if Θ, Θ′ are two transformation classes, then
Θ < Θ′ holds if and only if Θ ∗ γ < Θ′ ∗ γ holds. This implies that Θ ∈ V E if and
only if Θ ∗ γ ∈ V E or, in other words, V E ∗ γ = V E. Now write E ′ = E ∗ γ. We
then have V E ⊂ E ′ . Let Θ ∈ T C ∗ (O) \ E ′ . Then Θ ∗ γ −1 ∈ T C ∗ (O) \ E. Thus,
by the definition of E as the spine of T C ∗ (O), we have that there is a greatest
element Ψ ∈ E with Ψ < Θ ∗ γ −1 . Then Ψ ∗ γ ∈ E ′ is the greatest element with
Ψ ∗ γ < Θ. Consequently, E ′ satisfies the defining properties of the spine E. It
follows E ⊂ E ′ = E ∗ γ. Since this holds for arbitrary γ, we obtain E = E ∗ γ.
3.5. Examples. In this subsection, we want to present some examples of operads
leading to already well-known operad groups as well as to new groups to which the
finiteness result of Section 4 is applicable.
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
27
3.5.1. Free operads. Only very briefly we want to remark that the operad groups
associated to operads freely generated by operations of degree at least 2 correspond
exactly to the so-called diagram groups defined in [25]. When considering free
symmetric operads, we get symmetric versions of diagram groups which are called
“braided” in [25, Definition 16.2]. The truly braided diagram groups are the ones
arising from free braided operads.
In particular, the operad group associated to the operad OF freely generated by
one color and a single binary operation is isomorphic to Thompson’s group F . This
has first been observed in [18]. Moreover, if we consider the symmetric resp. braided
operad OV resp. OBV freely generated by one color and a single binary operation,
we obtain Thompson’s group V resp. the braided Thompson group BV .
More details on the free case can be found in [42].
3.5.2. Suboperads of endomorphism operads. Recall that there is a planar resp. symmetric resp. braided operad End(C) naturally associated to each planar resp. symmetric resp. braided monoidal category C, called the endomorphism operad. The
colors of End(C) are the objects in C and the sets of operations are given by
End(C)(a1 , . . . , an ; b) = HomC (a1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ an , b)
Let G be a subgroupoid of C and S be a set of higher degree operations in E :=
End(C) with outputs and inputs being objects of G. Then we can look at the
suboperad of E generated by this data: It is the smallest suboperad O such that
I(O) = G and such that the elements in S are operations in O. These suboperads
are in general not free in the sense of 3.5.1 though we have only specified generators.
The relations are automatically modelled by the ambient category C.
Not always is the map S → T C(O) sending an operation to its transformation
class a bijection onto the set of very elementary classes. However, this is true if the
following conditions are satisfied:
(V1 ) If θ, θ′ ∈ S with θ 6= θ′ , then [θ] and [θ′ ] are incomparable, i.e. [θ] 6≤ [θ′ ]
and [θ] 6≥ [θ′ ]. In particular, they are not equal.
(V2 ) The set of transformation classes represented by operations in S is closed
under right multiplication with operations in G, i.e. for each θ ∈ S and
γ ∈ G there is θ′ ∈ S with [θ ∗ γ] = [θ′ ].
We want to be a bit more explicit now and observe suboperads of the endomorphism operad E of the symmetric monoidal category (TOP, ⊔) where ⊔ is the
coproduct (i.e. the disjoint union) of topological spaces. We call an operation
(f1 , . . . , fk ) in E mono if the images of the maps fi : Xi → X are pairwise disjoint
in X and the fi are injective. We call it epi if the images cover X. It is not hard
to prove that if all operations in a suboperad of E are mono, then it satisfies the
right cancellation property. Likewise, if all the operations are epi, then it satisfies
the left cancellation property.
We give an explicit example to illustrate the above procedure. Consider the unit
square and the right angled triangle obtained by halving the unit square:
Consider all isometries of the square and the triangle, i.e. the dihedral group D4
and Z/2Z. The disjoint union of these isometry groups forms a groupoid G lying
in TOP. Consider the following subdivisions, called very elementary subdivisions:
28
WERNER THUMANN
The set S has three elements, one for each sudivision: The first one maps four
squares to each square in the first subdivision via coordinate-wise linear transformations. The second one maps four triangles to each triangle in the second
subdivision via orientation preserving similarities. The third one maps two triangles to each triangle in the third subdivision via orientation preserving similarities.
As above, the groupoid G together with the set S generate a suboperad O of the
symmetric operad E = End(TOP, ⊔).
The transformation classes are in one to one correspondence with subdivisions of
the square or the triangle which can be obtained by iteratively applying the three
subdivisions above. We have Θ1 ≤ Θ2 if and only if Θ2 can be obtained from Θ1
by performing further subdivisions. For example, we have
≤
From this it follows easily that the transformation classes represented by the very
elementary subdivisions are not comparable, i.e. (V1 ) is satisfied. Furthermore,
when applying an isometry of the square or the triangle to one of the operations
in S, we obtain the same operation with a transformation precomposed. Thus,
also (V2 ) is satisfied. It follows that the very elementary subdivisions correspond
exactly to the very elementary classes of O.
To find all the elementary transformation classes, we have to follow the construction in 3.14. There is exactly one minimal subdivision of the square which refines
the two very elementary subdivisions of the square:
Thus, this subdivision represents the only elementary class which is not very elementary.
All the operations in O are clearly epi, so it satisfies the left cancellation property.
Not all of them are mono, but we can change the definitions a little bit and obtain an
isomorphic operad where all operations are mono: Instead of the closed square and
triangle, we can consider the open square and triangle and also subdivisions into
open squares and triangles. Thus, O also satisfies the right cancellation property.
Moreover, we claim that it satisfies square filling. To see this, consider the following
chains of subdivisions:
···
···
These are cofinal in the sense that every subdivision of the square resp. triangle is
smaller than or equal to one of the subdivisions of the first resp. second chain. From
Observation 3.12 it follows that O satisfies square filling. All in all, O satisfies the
cancellative calculus of fractions.
⊲ Cube cutting operads. Let N be a finite set of natural numbers greater than
or equal to 2. Denote by hN i the multiplicative submonoid of N generated by
the numbers in N . We say that the numbers in N are independent if, whenever
a natural number n can be written as a product nr11 · · · nrkk of pairwise distinct
numbers ni ∈ N , then the exponents ri are already uniquely determined by n. In
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
29
other words, N is a basis for hN i. This is satisfied for example if the numbers in
N are pairwise coprime or, even stronger, if they are prime. For later reference, we
record the following two trivial observations:
(B1 ) No number n ∈ N is a product of other numbers in N .
(B2 ) Whenever n1 , . . . , nk ∈ N are pairwise distinct numbers and n ∈ hN i is
divisible by each ni in hN i, i.e. there is mi ∈ hN i with n = ni mi , then n is
also divisible by the product n1 · · · nk in hN i.
There are non-bases N which satisfy (B1 ) but not (B2 ), for example N = {2, 6, 7, 21}.
For this N we have 6 · 7 = 42 = 2 · 21.
In the same vein as above, we now construct cube cutting operads. For d ≥ 1,
consider the d-dimensional unit cube and a subgroup if its group of isometries.
Define this group to be the groupoid G lying in TOP. Next, we want to specify very
elementary subdivisions of the cube. For each j ∈ {1, . . . , d}, let Nj ⊂ N be a set of
natural numbers as in the preceding paragraph. For each such j and n ∈ Nj , there
is a very elementary subdivision of the cube given by cutting it, perpendicularly
to the j’th coordinate axis, into n congruent subbricks. The following are the very
elementary subdivisions in the case d = 2, N1 = {2} and N2 = {3}:
There is one operation in S for each such very elementary subdivision: Cubes are
coordinate-wise linearly rescaled to fit into the subbricks of the subdivisions. The
groupoid G together with the set S generate a suboperad O of E = End(TOP, ⊔)
which we call a symmetric cube cutting operad since we will also define planar cube
cutting operads below.
The transformation classes are in one to one correspondence with subdivisions
of the cube obtained by iteratively applying n-cuts in direction j as above. Two
transformation classes are comparable if and only if one is a subdivision of the
other. From (B1 ) it follows that two very elementary subdivisions are not comparable. Consequently, (V1 ) is satisfied. It is not always true that right multiplication
of elements in G with operations in S yields another operation in S up to transformation. For example, a rotation of a vertically cutted square by an angle of π/2
yields a horizontally cutted square. Whether (V2 ) is satisfied or not depends on the
interplay between the isometries in G and the sets Nj . For example, it is satisfied if
G = 1 or if N1 = . . . = Nd . Let us always assume that G and the Nj are compatible
in a way such that (V2 ) is satisfied. Then the very elementary subdivisions are in
one to one correspondence with the very elementary transformation classes.
We want to identify the elementary transformation classes. For each element
T = (T1 , . . . , Td ) ∈ 2N1 × . . . × 2Nd of the product of the power sets such that
T 6= (∅, . . . , ∅), there is a transformation class ΘT which is obtained by iteratively
performing, for each j ∈ {1, . . . , d} and each n ∈ Tj , an n-cut in direction j on
every subbrick. The result is independent of the order of the cuts. These classes
are exactly the elementary classes. To see this, we make the following claim: If
ΘT and ΘT ′ are two such classes, then ΘT ∪T ′ is the smallest class Θ satisfying
ΘT ≤ Θ ≥ ΘT ′ . Here, the inclusion T ⊂ T ′ and the union T ∪ T ′ is meant to be
coordinate-wise. The figure below pictures the elementary operations in the case
d = 2, N1 = {2, 3} and N2 = {2, 3}.
30
WERNER THUMANN
E0
E1
E2
E3
To see the above claim, we consider the case d = 1 and set N := N1 . The case
d > 1 can be derived by applying the following observations coordinate-wise. Call a
transformation class regular if all the subintervals in the corresponding subdivision
of the unit interval have the same length. Now, let Θ be a transformation class
with ΘT ≤ Θ ≥ ΘT ′ . It is not hard to find the greatest regular class Θr with
Θr ≤ Θ. Since ΘT and ΘT ′ are regular, we have ΘT ≤ Θr ≥ ΘT ′ . There is a
unique n ∈ hN i such that n1 is the length of the subintervals in the subdivision of
Θr . Then ΘT ≤ Θr means that the product of the numbers in T divides n in hN i.
In particular, each t ∈ T divides n in hN i. Likewise, each t′ ∈ T ′ divides n in hN i.
It follows from (B2 ) that the product of the numbers in T ∪ T ′ divides n in hN i.
This implies ΘT ∪T ′ ≤ Θr and it follows ΘT ∪T ′ ≤ Θ, q.e.d.
All the operations in O are epi and O is isomorphic to a suboperad of E where
all operations are mono by considering open cubes instead of closed ones. Consequently, O satisfies the left and right cancellation property. We also find a cofinal
chain of subdivisions: The first subdivision in this chain is obtained by iteratively
applying, for each j ∈ {1, . . . , d} and each n ∈ Nj , an n-cut in direction j on every
subbrick. Then the whole chain is obtained by iterating this with every subbrick.
For example, in the case d = 2, N1 = {2} and N2 = {3}, we can take the following
chain:
···
Thus, O satisfies the square filling property. All in all, it satisfies the cancellative
calculus of fractions.
Note that the symmetric cube cutting operads are symmetric operads with transformations. When forgetting the symmetric structure on E, we obtain a planar
operad Epl and we can define suboperads, which are then planar operads with
transformations and which we call planar cube cutting operads, as follows: Consider the case d = 1. Set G = 1. Let N ⊂ N be a set of natural numbers as in
the first paragraph. There is one very elementary subdivision of the unit interval for each n ∈ N , cutting it into n pieces of equal length. The operations in
S linearly map unit intervals to the subintervals of very elementary subdivisions.
This time, however, we specify the order of these maps. We require that they are
ordered by their images via the natural ordering on the unit interval. Denote by
O the suboperad of Epl generated by this data. Note that O is a planar operad
with transformations which is degenerate in the sense that there are no degree 1
operations besides the identities. Thus, a transformation class is the same as an operation. Operations in O are in one to one correspondence with subdivision of the
unit interval which are obtained by iteratively applying n-cuts for various n ∈ N .
Two operations are related if and only if one is a subdivision of the other. The very
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
31
elementary operations are in one to one correspondence with the very elementary
subdivisions and the elementary operations can be described just as in the case of
symmetric cube cutting operads. Furthermore, O satisfies the cancellative calculus
of fractions.
We now look at the operad groups associated to these planar resp. symmetric
cube cutting operads. Using the fact that arrows in the fundamental groupoid of a
category satisfying the calculus of fractions can be represented by spans, it is easy
to identify the following operad groups (where G = 1 in each case):
• The Higman-Thompson groups Fn,r resp. Vn,r arise as the operad groups
(based at the object represented by a disjoint union of r unit intervals)
associated to the planar resp. symmetric cube cutting operads with d = 1
and N = {n}.
• The groups of piecewise linear homeomorphisms
of the (Cantor) unit
inter1
1
val F r, Z[ n1 ···n
],
hn
,
.
.
.
,
n
i
resp.
G
r,
Z[
],
hn
,
.
.
.
,
n
i
consid1
k
1
k
n1 ···nk
k
ered in [39] arise as the operad groups (based at the object represented by
a disjoint union of r unit intervals) associated to the planar resp. symmetric
cube cutting operads with d = 1 and N = {n1 , . . . , nk }.
• The higher dimensional Thompson groups nV (see [4]) arise as the operad
groups (based at the object represented by the n-dimensional unit cube)
associated to the symmetric cube cutting operads with d = n and Nj = {2}
for all j = 1, . . . , d.
⊲ Local similarity operads. In [26] groups were defined which act in a certain
way on compact ultrametric spaces. We recall the definition of a finite similarity
structure:
Definition 3.20. Let X be a compact ultrametric space. A finite similarity structure SimX on X consists of a finite set SimX (B1 , B2 ) of similarities B1 → B2 for
every ordered pair of balls (B1 , B2 ) such that the following axioms are satisfied:
• (Identities) Each SimX (B, B) contains the identity.
• (Inverses) If γ ∈ SimX (B1 , B2 ), then also γ −1 ∈ SimX (B2 , B1 ).
• (Compositions) If γ1 ∈ SimX (B1 , B2 ) and γ2 ∈ SimX (B2 , B3 ), then also
γ1 γ2 ∈ SimX (B1 , B3 ).
• (Restrictions) If γ ∈ SimX (B1 , B2 ) and B3 ⊂ B1 is a subball, then also
γ|B3 ∈ SimX (B3 , γ(B3 )).
Here, a similarity γ : X → Y of metric spaces is a homeomorphism such that
there is a λ > 0 with d(γ(x1 ), γ(x2 )) = λd(x1 , x2 ) for all x1 , x2 ∈ X. Let SimX be a
finite similarity structure on the compact ultrametric space X. A homeomorphism
γ : X → X is said to be locally determined by SimX if for every x ∈ X there is a
ball x ∈ B ⊂ X such that γ(B) is a ball and γ|B ∈ SimX (B, γ(B)). The set of all
such homeomorphisms forms a group which we denote by Γ(SimX ).
To a finite similarity structure SimX , we can associate a symmetric operad with
transformations O, a suboperad of E = End(TOP, ⊔), and reobtain the groups
Γ(SimX ) as operad groups. We do this by appealing to the procedure above. Two
balls B1 , B2 in X are called SimX -equivalent if SimX (B1 , B2 ) 6= ∅. Choose one ball
in each SimX -equivalence class (the isomorphism class of the operad we will define
does not depend on this choice). Consider the groupoid G lying in TOP which is the
disjoint union of the groups SimX (B, B) with B a chosen ball. The set S contains
one operation in E for each chosen ball B: Consider the maximal proper subballs
A1 , . . . , Ak of B. For each i = 1, . . . , k choose a similarity γi ∈ SimX (Bi , Ai ) where
Bi is the unique chosen ball equivalent to Ai . Now the operation associated to B
maps the chosen balls Bi to Ai using the similarities γi . The data (G, S) generates
a suboperad O of E.
32
WERNER THUMANN
Each transformation class in O is uniquely determined by a chosen ball together
with a subdivision into subballs. Two such subdivisions are related if and only if one
can be obtained from the other by further subdividing the subballs. Condition (V1 )
is trivially true since the operations in S have different codomains. A similarity in
SimX (B, B) is an isometry γ : B → B which permutes the maximal proper subballs
and the restriction of γ to a maximal proper subball is again a similarity in SimX . It
follows that right multiplication of an element in G with an operation in S gives the
same operation modulo transformation. In particular, (V2 ) is satisfied. Thus, the
very elementary classes of O are in one to one correspondence with the chosen balls
together with their subdivisions into the proper maximal subballs. Since every two
very elementary classes have different colors as codomains, there are no elementary
classes which are not very elementary.
All the operations in O are both mono and epi. Thus, it satisfies both left and
right cancellation. It also satisfies square filling and thus the cancellative calculus
of fractions since we again find a cofinal sequence of subdivisions for each chosen
ball B: Define the chain inductively by subdividing each subball by their maximal
proper subballs.
Using the fact that arrows in the fundamental groupoid of a category satisfying
the calculus of fractions can be represented by spans, it is not hard to establish an
isomorphism π1 (O, X) ∼
= Γ(SimX ) where we assume that X is the chosen ball of
its SimX -equivalence class.
3.5.3. Ribbon Thompson group. To close this subsection, we briefly want to discuss
an operad yielding an operad group RV which naturally fits into the sequence of
well-known groups F, V, BV . First observe the free braided operad with transformations generated by a single color, the group Z as groupoid of degree 1 operations
and a single binary operation. The components of the corresponding groupoid of
transformations are the groups Bn ⋉ Zn . Think of elements of these groups as
ribbons which can braid and twist. A single twist corresponds to a generator in Z.
Then we impose the following relation on this operad:
=
The caret corresponds to the generating binary operation. The operations in this
braided operad with transformations are in one to one correspondence with binary
trees together with braiding and twisting ribbons attached to the leaves. The
transformation classes are in one to one correspondence with binary trees. The
only very elementary class is represented by the binary tree with two leaves (the
caret). There are no strictly elementary classes. It satisfies the cancellative calculus
of fractions. Consequently, elements in the associated operad group based at 1 can
be represented by pairs of binary trees where the leaves are connected by braiding
and twisting ribbons. Composition is modelled by concatenating two such tree
pair diagrams, removing all dipoles formed by carets and then applying the above
relation in order to obtain another tree pair diagram.
4. A topological finiteness result
Before we state the main theorem of this article, we have to introduce two more
definitions.
+
Definition 4.1. We say that a group G is of type F∞
if G and all of its sub+
groups are of type F∞ . We then say that a groupoid is of type F∞
(or F∞ ) if its
+
automorphism groups are of type F∞ (or F∞ ).
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
33
+
For example, all finite groups and Z are of type F∞
.
Definition 4.2. Let O be a (symmetric/braided) operad with transformations. An
object X in S(O) is called reduced if no non-transformation arrow in S(O) has X
as its domain. We call O color-tame if the degree of all reduced objects is bounded
from above.
Note that if O is monochromatic and there exists at least one higher degree
operation, then it is automatically color-tame.
Theorem 4.3. Let O be a planar or symmetric or braided operad with transformations. Assume that O has only finitely many colors and is color-tame. Assume
further that O satisfies the cancellative calculus of fractions, is of finite type and
+
I(O) is a groupoid of type F∞
. Then for every object X in S(O) the operad group
π1 (O, X) is of type F∞ .
Question 4.4. Can the requirement color-tameness be dropped?
Remark 4.5. There is also a version of this theorem for free operads: Assume that
O is free as a (symmetric/braided) operad with transformations, has only finitely
many colors, is color-tame, finitely generated and that I(O) is a groupoid of type
F∞ . Then π1 (O, X) is of type F∞ .
The proof of the free case is parallel to the proof in this article (with small
modifications and additions, see [42]). Parts of the theorem for the free case are
also proven in [14, 15] (in the language of diagram groups).
Concerning the examples in Subsection 3.5, it should be noted that the free
operads OF , OV and OBV also satisfy the conditions in Theorem 4.3.
The main tool to prove this theorem is, as usual, Brown’s criterion [7]. More
precisely, we will need the following special version of it:
Theorem 4.6. Let Γ be a discrete group and X be a contractible Γ-CW-complex
with isotropy groups of type F∞ . Assume we have a filtration (Xn )n∈N of X such
that each Xn is a Γ-CW-subcomplex of finite type and such that the connectivity of
the pairs (Xn , Xn−1 ) tends to infinity as n → ∞. Then Γ is of type F∞ .
We sketch a geometric proof of this criterion using a blow-up construction of
Lück [29, Lemma 4.1]: For each conjugacy class [H] of isotropy groups of X, we
choose a free contractible H-CW-complex EH of finite type. Using these, we
can construct a free Γ-CW-complex F (X) which is homotopy equivalent to X.
The idea is to replace the equivariant cell Γ/H × Dn in X by the Γ-CW-complex
(Γ ×H EH) × Dn . More details can be found in the proofs of [29, Lemma 4.1 and
Theorem 3.1]. We can also apply this construction to each Γ-CW-subcomplex Xn
and obtain free Γ-CW-complexes F (Xi ) homotopy equivalent to Xi and of finite
type. For each n ∈ N we find k ∈ N big enough so that Xk and hence F (Xk )
is n-connected. By equivariantly gluing cells in dimensions n + 2 and higher, we
obtain a free contractible Γ-CW-complex with finitely many equivariant cells up to
dimension n + 1. Consequently, Γ is of type Fn+1 . Since n was arbitrary, it follows
that Γ is of type F∞ (see e.g. [23, Proposition 7.2.2]).
The remaining subsections are devoted to the proof of Theorem 4.3.
4.1. Three types of arc complexes. Let d ∈ {1, 2, 3} and C be a set of colors.
Let X = (c1 , . . . , cn ) be a word in the colors of C. An archetype consists of a unique
identifier together with a word in the colors of C of length at least 2. Let A be a set
of archetypes. To this data, we will associate a simplicial complex AC d (C, A; X).
Consider the points 1, . . . , n ∈ R and embed them into Rd via the first component
embedding R → Rd . Color these points with the colors in the word X (i.e. the point
34
WERNER THUMANN
i is colored with the color ci ) and call them nodes. Denote the set of nodes by N .
A link is the image of an embedding γ : [0, 1] → Rd such that γ(0) and γ(1) are
nodes. Note that a link may contain more than two nodes. Two links connecting
the same set of nodes are equivalent if there is an isotopy of Rd \ N which takes one
link to the other. An equivalence class of links is called an arc. Note that in the
case d = 1, arcs and links are the same since each arc is represented by a unique
link. We say that two arcs are disjoint if there are representing links which are
disjoint. In the cases d = 2, 3, we can choose representing links of a collection of
arcs such that the links are in minimal position:
Lemma 4.7. Assume d = 2 or d = 3. Let a0 , . . . , ak be arcs with ai 6= aj for each
i 6= j. Then there are representing links α0 , . . . , αk such that |αi ∩ αj | is finite and
minimal for each i 6= j.
Proof. In the case d = 3, we can always find representing links which only intersect
at nodes, if at all. The case d = 2 is a bit more complicated. We use the ideas from
[9, Lemma 3.2]: Consider the nodes as punctures in the plane R2 . Then we can
find a hyperbolic metric on that punctured plane. Now define αi to be the geodesic
within the class ai .
A link connecting a set of nodes M is called admissible if there is an isotopy of
Rd \ M taking the link into the image of the first component embedding R → Rd .
In the case d = 1, this is vacuous. In the case d = 2, this implies in particular
that, when travelling the link starting from the lowest node, the nodes are visited
in ascending order. This last property is even equivalent to being admissible in the
case d = 3. An arc is called admissible if one and consequently all of its links are
admissible. Now label an admissible arc with the identifier of an archetype in A.
We require that the word formed by the colors of the connected nodes (in ascending
order) equals the color word of the archetype. Call such a labelled admissible arc
an archetypal arc.
The vertices of AC d (C, A; X) are the archetypal arcs. Two vertices are joined
by an edge if the corresponding arcs are disjoint. This determines the complex as
a flag complex. A k-simplex is therefore a set of k + 1 pairwise disjoint archetypal
arcs. We call this an archetypal arc system. It follows from Lemma 4.7 above
that if {a0 , . . . , ak } is an archetypal arc system, then we always find representing
links αi of ai such that the αi are pairwise disjoint. The following are examples of
2-simplices in the cases d = 1, 2, 3 (where we have omitted the labels on the arcs).
The following are non-examples of simplices in the case d = 2. In the first diagram,
the two arcs are not disjoint and in the second diagram, the arc is not admissible.
However, the second diagram would represent an admissible arc in the case d = 3.
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
35
Definition 4.8. Let C be a set of colors and A be a set of archetypes. A word
in the colors of C is called reduced if it admits no archetypal arc on it. The set
of archetypes A is called tame if the length of all reduced words is bounded from
above. The length of an archetype is the length of its color word. The set of
archetypes A is of finite type if the length of all archetypes is bounded from above.
Theorem 4.9. Let d ∈ {1, 2, 3}. Let C be a set of colors and A be a set of
archetypes. Assume that A is tame and of finite type. Let mr be the smallest
natural number greater than the length of any reduced color word and ma be the
maximal length of archetypes in A. Define
l − mr
−1
νκ (l) :=
κ
Let X be a word in the colors of C and denote by lX the length of X. Then the
complex AC d (C, A; X) is νκd (lX)-connected where
κ1 := 2ma + mr − 2
κ2 := 2ma − 1
κ3 := 2ma − 1
For the proof in the case d = 2 we have to pass to a slightly larger class of
complexes: Instead of R2 we consider links and arcs in the punctured plane S =
R2 \ {p1 , . . . , pl } with finitely many punctures pi ∈ R2 disjoint from the nodes.
Here, we define two links connecting the same set of nodes to be equivalent if
they differ by an isotopy of S \ N and a link connecting a set of nodes M to be
admissible if there is an isotopy of R2 \ M taking the link into the image of the first
component embedding R → R2 . Note that in the latter case, we require an isotopy
of R2 \ M and not of S \ M , i.e. we allow the links to be pulled over punctures. We
denote the corresponding complex of archetypal arc systems again by AC d (C, A; X),
suppressing the additional data of punctures since, as we will see, Theorem 4.9 is
still valid for this larger class of complexes.
4.1.1. Proof of the connectivity theorem. The proof essentially consists of slightly
modified ideas from [9, Subsection 3.3].
We induct over the length lX of X. The induction start is lX ≥ mr . This implies
that X is not reduced and thus admits an archetypal arc on it. It follows that
AC d (C, A; X) is non-empty, i.e. (−1)-connected. For the induction step, assume
lX ≥ mr + κd . We look at the cases d = 1, 2, 3 separately, starting with the case
d = 2 since it is the hardest one.
⊲ The two-dimensional case. Choose a vertex of AC 2 := AC 2 (C, A; X) represented by an archetypal arc b. Let v1 < . . . < vt be the nodes connected by b. Let
AC 02 be the full subcomplex of AC 2 spanned by the archetypal arcs which do not
meet the nodes vi .
We want to estimate the connectivity of the pair (AC 2 , AC 02 ) using the Morse
method for simplicial complexes (see e.g. Subsection 2.10). Let a be an archetypal
arc. Define
(
1 if a meets vi
si (a) :=
0 else
36
WERNER THUMANN
for each i = 1, . . . , t. Now set
h(a) := s1 (a), . . . , st (a)
Note that the right side is a sequence of t numbers in {0, 1}. Interpret these
sequences as binary numbers and order them accordingly. Then h is a Morse
function building up AC 2 from AC 02 since archetypal arcs with h-value equal to
(0, . . . , 0) are exactly the archetypal arcs in AC 02 and two archetypal arcs with the
same h-value different from (0, . . . , 0) are not connected by an edge.
We want to inspect the descending links with respect to this Morse function h.
Let a be an archetypal arc with Morse height greater than (0, . . . , 0). Find the
smallest τ ∈ {1, . . . , t} such that sτ (a) = 1. It is not hard to prove that lk↓ (a)
is the full subcomplex of AC 2 spanned by archetypal arcs disjoint from a and not
meeting any vi with i < τ . Let X ′ be the color word which is obtained from X
by removing the colors corresponding to nodes which are contained in a and to
the nodes vi with i < τ . Then we see that lk↓ (a) is isomorphic to AC 2 (C, A; X ′ )
with an additional puncture corresponding to a and further additional punctures
corresponding to the nodes vi with i < τ . By induction, it follows that lk↓ (a) is
νκ2 (lX ′ )-connected. Denote by la the length of a, i.e. the number of nodes it meets.
Then we can estimate
lX ′ = lX − la − (τ − 1)
≥ lX − la − t + 1
≥ lX − ma − t + 1
≥ lX − 2ma + 1
Thus, lk↓ (a) is νκ2 (lX − 2ma + 1)-connected. Consequently, by the Morse method,
the connectivity of the pair (AC 2 , AC 02 ) is
νκ2 (lX − 2ma + 1) + 1 = νκ2 (lX)
because of κ2 = 2ma − 1.
The second step of the proof consists of showing that the inclusion ι : AC 02 → AC 2
induces the trivial map in πm for m ≤ νκ2 (lX). It then follows from the long exact
homotopy sequence of the pair (AC 2 , AC 02 ) that AC 2 is νκ2 (lX)-connected which
completes the proof in the case d = 2.
Let ϕ : S m → AC 02 be a map with m ≤ νκ2 (lX). We have to show that ψ :=
ϕ ∗ ι : S m → AC 2 is homotopic to a constant map. Think of S m as the boundary
of an (m + 1)-simplex. By simplicial approximation [37, Theorem 3.4.8] we can
subdivide S m and homotope ϕ to a simplicial map. So we will assume in the
following that ϕ is simplicial. Next, we want to apply [9, Lemma 3.9] in order
to subdivide S m further and homotope ψ to a simplexwise injective map. This
means that whenever vertices v 6= w in S m are joined by an edge, then ψ(v) 6=
ψ(w). To apply the lemma, we have to show that the link of every k-simplex σ in
AC 2 is (m − 2k − 2)-connected. So let a0 , . . . , ak be pairwise disjoint archetypal
arcs representing a k-simplex σ. The link of this simplex is the full subcomplex
spanned by the archetypal arcs which are disjoint from every ai . Deleting every
color corresponding to nodes which are contained in one of the ai from X, we
obtain a color word X ′ and it is easy to see that the link of σ is isomorphic to
AC 2 (C, A; X ′ ) with one additional puncture for each ai . By induction, we obtain
that lk(σ) is νκ2 (lX ′ )-connected. We have the estimate lX ′ ≥ lX − (k + 1)ma and
thus
νκ2 (lX ′ ) ≥ νκ2 lX − (k + 1)ma
lX − (k + 1)ma − mr
=
−1
2ma − 1
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
37
(k + 1)ma
lX − mr
−1
−
2ma − 1
2ma − 1
lX − mr
(2k + 2)(2ma − 1)
≥
−
−1
2ma − 1
2ma − 1
= νκ2 (lX) − (2k + 2)
=
≥ m − 2k − 2
So the hypothesis of the lemma is satisfied and we will assume in the following that
ψ is simplexwise injective.
We now want to show that ψ can be homotoped so that the image is contained
in the star of b. Since the star of a vertex is always contractible, this will finish the
proof. We will homotope ψ by moving single vertices of S m step by step, eventually
landing in the star of b. Consider the vertices a1 , . . . , al of ψ(S m ) which do net yet
lie in the star of b, i.e. which are not disjoint to b. Choose representing links αi
of ai and β of b such that the system of links (β, α1 , . . . , αl ) is in minimal position
as in Lemma 4.7. Note the little subtlety that archetypal arcs may have the same
underlying arc but are different because they have different labels. In this case,
homotope the corresponding links a little bit so that they intersect only at nodes.
Note also that each αi intersects β, but not at nodes since each ai comes from AC 02 .
Last but not least, we can assume that whenever p is an intersection point of β
with one of the αi , then there is at most one αi meeting the point p.
Now look at the intersection point p of one of the αi with β which is closest
to v1 along β. Write α for the link which intersects β at this point and a for the
corresponding arc.
α
vj
w
vj+1
w′
β
Choose a vertex x in S m which maps to a via ψ. Define another link α′ as follows:
Let j be such that the intersection point p lies on the segment of β connecting
vj with vj+1 . Denote by w < w′ the nodes such that p lies on the segment of α
connecting w with w′ . Now push this segment of α along β over the node vj such
that α and α′ bound a disk whose interior does not contain any puncture or node
other than vj .
α′
β
Note that α′ is still admissible. Denote by a′ the archetypal arc with link α′ and
the same label as a. Our goal is now to homotope ψ to a simplicial map ψ ′ such
that ψ ′ (x) = a′ and ψ ′ (y) = ψ(y) for all other vertices y. Iterating this procedure
often enough, we arrive at a map ψ ∗ homotopic to ψ such that ψ ∗ (y) ∈ st(b) for
each vertex y. For example, the next step would be to move x to the vertex α′′ :
38
WERNER THUMANN
α′′
β
By simplexwise injectivity, no vertex of lk(x) is mapped to a. Furthermore, a
vertex of AC 2 in the image of ψ disjoint to a must also be disjoint to a′ because
we have chosen α such that no other αi intersects β between p and v1 . From these
observations, it follows that
ψ lk(x) ⊂ lk(a) ∩ lk(a′ )
This inclusion enables us to define a simplicial map ψ ′ : S m → AC 2 with ψ ′ (x) = a′
and ψ ′ (y) = ψ(y) for all other vertices y. Let X ′ be the color word obtained from
X by removing all colors corresponding to nodes which are contained in a or to
the node vj . Then lk(a) ∩ lk(a′ ) is isomorphic to AC 2 (C, A; X ′ ) with an additional
puncture corresponding to the disk bounded by α ∪ α′ . Thus, by induction, it is
νκ2 (lX ′ )-connected. We have the estimate lX ′ ≥ lX − ma − 1 and therefore
νκ2 (lX ′ ) ≥ νκ2 lX − ma − 1
lX − ma − 1 − mr
−1
=
2ma − 1
ma + 1
lX − mr
−1
−
=
2ma − 1
2ma − 1
lX − mr
2ma − 1
≥
−
−1
2ma − 1
2ma − 1
= νκ2 (lX) − 1
≥m−1
Since lk(x) is an (m − 1)-sphere, this connectivity bound for lk(a) ∩ lk(a′ ) implies
that the map ψ|lk(x) : lk(x) → lk(a) ∩ lk(a′ ) can be extended to the star st(x) of x
which is an m-disk. So we obtain a map ϑ : st(x) → lk(a) ∩ lk(a′ ) coinciding with
ψ on the boundary lk(x). We can now homotope ψ|st(x) rel lk(x) to ϑ within st(a)
and further to ψ ′ within st(a′ ). This finishes the proof of the theorem in the case
d = 2.
⊲ The three-dimensional case. Choose an archetypal arc b connecting the nodes
v1 < . . . < vt and let AC 03 be the full subcomplex of AC 3 := AC 3 (C, A; X) spanned
by the archetypal arcs which do not meet the nodes vi .
With a very similar Morse argument as in the case d = 2 above, we can show
that the pair (AC 3 , AC 03 ) is νκ3 (lX)-connected.
Again, the second step consists of showing that the inclusion ι : AC 03 → AC 3
induces the trivial map in πm for m ≤ νκ3 (lX). This is much easier in the case
d = 3: Let ϕ : S m → AC 03 be a map and assume without loss of generality that it is
simplicial. But then the map ψ := ϕ ∗ ι : S m → AC 3 already lies in the star st(b)
of b since an archetypal arc not meeting any of the nodes vi is already disjoint to
b. Consequently, ψ can be homotoped to a constant map and this concludes the
proof in the case d = 3.
⊲ The one-dimensional case. Choose an archetypal arc b connecting the nodes
v1 < . . . < vt such that the color word formed by the first r nodes w < v1 is
reduced. Let AC 01 be the full subcomplex of AC 1 := AC 1 (C, A; X) spanned by the
archetypal arcs which do not meet the nodes vi . This condition is equivalent to not
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
39
meeting any nodes w ≤ vt . These are simply the first s nodes w1 < . . . < ws where
s = r + t. In other words, wi is the point i ∈ R colored with the color ci from X.
For each archetypal arc a not contained in AC 01 there exists a unique 1 ≤ q ≤ s
such that a meets wq but not w1 , . . . , wq−1 . In this case, define h(a) = −q. Then h
is a Morse function building up AC 1 from AC 01 . So let a be such an archetypal arc.
Let X ′ be the color word obtained from X by removing all colors corresponding to
the nodes contained in a and to the nodes w1 , . . . , wq−1 . Then the descending link
lk↓ (a) is isomorphic to AC 1 (C, A; X ′ ) and by induction, it is νκ1 (lX ′ )-connected.
We can estimate
lX ′ = lX − la − (q − 1)
= lX − la − q + 1
≥ lX − ma − q + 1
≥ lX − ma − (ma + mr − 1) + 1
= lX − 2ma − mr + 2
Thus, lk↓ (a) is νκ1 (lX − 2ma − mr + 2)-connected. Consequently, by the Morse
method, the connectivity of the pair (AC 1 , AC 01 ) is
νκ1 (lX − 2ma − mr + 2) + 1 = νκ1 (lX)
because of κ1 = 2ma + mr − 2.
Just as in the case d = 3, one can show that the inclusion ι : AC 01 → AC 1 induces
the trivial map in πm for m ≤ νκ1 (lX). This proves the theorem in the case d = 1.
Remark 4.10. The method used in the proof of [14, Proposition 4.11] yields the
better connectivity νκ (lX) with κ = ma + mr − 1 for the case d = 1.
4.2. A contractible complex. From now on, let O be an operad as in Theorem
4.3. Furthermore, let X be an object in S := S(O). By abuse of notation, the
connected component of S containing the object X will again be denoted by S.
Furthermore, we abbreviate Γ := π1 (O, X).
As already noted above, the strategy to prove Theorem 4.3 is to apply Brown’s
criterion 4.6 to a suitable contractible complex on which the group in question acts.
Consider the universal covering category U := UX (S) of S based at X. We claim:
U is a generalized poset and contractible.
This follows from Proposition 2.13. The first claim together with the remarks after
Definition 2.8 implies that we can form the quotient category U/G where G is the
subgroupoid of U consisting of the transformations in S (lifted to U) and that U/G
is a poset, the underlying poset of U. Recall that Γ acts on U which is encoded
in a functor Γ → CAT sending the unique object of Γ to U. One can easily see
that this functor induces a functor Γ → CAT sending the unique object to U/G. In
other words, Γ also acts on U/G. More concretely, an arrow f : X → X in Γ acts
on an object [g : X → Y ] of U/G from the right via [g] · f := [f −1 g]. This will be
the action to which we want to apply Brown’s criterion. Since U/G is homotopy
equivalent to U, the second claim implies that also U/G is contractible. So the first
condition in Brown’s criterion is satisfied.
4.3. Isotropy groups. We continue to verify the conditions in Brown’s criterion
for the action of Γ on U/G. In this subsection, we show that cell stabilizers are of
type F∞ . First, we note that U/G is indeed a Γ-CW-complex. This follows from
the following general remark.
Remark 4.11. Let G be a group acting on a category C. An element g ∈ G fixing a
cell setwise already fixes its vertices and so fixes the cell pointwise. Consequently,
40
WERNER THUMANN
a category with an action of a discrete group G is a G-CW-complex. If C is a
generalized poset, a cell stabilizer is equal to the intersection of the vertex stabilizers
of that cell.
In the following, we abbreviate T := T (O) and I := I(O).
Lemma 4.12. The groupoid T formed by the transformations in S is of type F∞ .
Proof. By assumption, the groupoid I formed by the degree 1 operations is of type
F∞ . The groupoid T is Mon(I) in the planar case, Sym(I) in the symmetric case
and Braid(I) in the braided case (see Subsection 2.8 for the definitions of these
categories).
Choose a color in each component of I. Let Y be an object in T . We have to
show that AutT (Y ) is of type F∞ . We can assume without loss of generality that
Y decomposes as a tensor product of chosen colors: Y = c1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ ck . In the planar
case we have
AutMon(I) (Y ) = AutI (c1 ) × . . . × AutI (ck )
and the claim follows because the AutI (ci ) are of type F∞ . For the symmetric and
braided case, first assume that all the colors ci are equal to one chosen color c. In
the symmetric case, we then have
AutSym(I) (Y ) = Sk ⋉ AutI (c)k
where Sk , the symmetric group on k strands, acts by permutation of the factors.
More precisely, we have the group homomorphism
ϕ : Sk → Aut(Gk )
σ 7→ (g1 , . . . , gk ) 7→ (g1⊲σ−1 , . . . , gk⊲σ−1 )
which gives a right action of Sk on Gk by the definition g · σ = g⊲(σ⊲ϕ). The
multiplication in the semidirect product Sk ⋉ Gk is then given by
(σ, g) ∗ (σ ′ , g ′ ) := σ ∗ σ ′ , (g · σ ′ ) ∗ g ′
Since Sk is a finite group, it is also of type F∞ . Since semidirect products of type
F∞ groups are of type F∞ [23, Exercise 1 on page 176 and Proposition 7.2.2], it
follows that AutSym(I) (Y ) is of type F∞ . In the braided case we have
AutBraid(I) (Y ) = Bk ⋉ AutI (c)k
where Bk , the braid group on k strands, acts via permutation of the factors through
the projection Bk → Sk . The braid groups Bk are of type F∞ [38, Theorem A]. As
above, it follows that AutBraid(I) (Y ) is of type F∞ .
Remains to handle the case where not all the colors ci lie in the same component
of I. Denote by Bk′ the finite index subgroup of Bk consisting of the elements σ
with the property ci⊲σ = ci . Since different ci are not connected by an isomorphism
in I, we now have
AutBraid(I) (Y ) = Bk′ ⋉ AutI (c1 ) × .. × AutI (ck )
where Bk′ still acts by permuting the factors. This action is well-defined due to
the definition of Bk′ . Recall that a group is of type F∞ if and only if a finite
index subgroup is of type F∞ [23, Corollary 7.2.4]. It follows that Bk′ and thus
AutBraid(I) (Y ) is of type F∞ . The symmetric case can be treated similarly.
Lemma 4.13. Let P be an object in U/G. Then the stabilizer subgroup StabΓ (P)
is of type F∞ .
Proof. Fix an arrow p : X → Y in π1 (S) which represents the object P in U/G,
i.e. [p] = P. Let γ ∈ Γ fix the point P. This means [γ −1 p] = [p] · γ = [p]. It
follows that there is some transformation t : Y → Y such that γ −1 p = pt. This
is equivalent to p−1 γp = t−1 which implies that p−1 γp is an element in AutT (Y ).
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
41
Conversely, for τ a transformation in AutT (Y ), the element pτ p−1 is contained in
StabΓ (P). Thus, the map
StabΓ (P) → AutT (Y )
γ 7→ p−1 γp
is an isomorphism with inverse given by τ 7→ pτ p−1 . Since AutT (Y ) is of type F∞
by the previous lemma, the claim follows. Note that this isomorphism depends on
the choice of p. However, two such choices differ by a transformation τ and the two
corresponding isomorphisms differ by conjugation with τ .
We say that two operations θ1 and θ2 are two-sided transformation equivalent if
there are transformations α, γ such that θ2 = α ∗ θ1 ∗ γ.
Proposition 4.14. The stabilizer subgroups of cells in U/G are of type F∞ .
Proof. In the following, we restrict ourselves to the braided case. The planar and
symmetric cases are similar and simpler.
We first choose a color in each connected component of I. Next, we choose an
operation in each two-sided transformation class such that the output of the chosen
operation is a chosen color.
A non-degenerate cell in the geometric realization of U/G is a sequence of composable non-trivial arrows in U/G
P0
ǫ0
ǫ1
/ P1
/ ···
ǫk−1
/ Pk
Let pk : X → Yk be a representing path of Pk such that Yk = c1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ cl is a tensor
product of chosen colors. In the proofs of Lemmas 4.12 and 4.13, we have seen that
pk induces an isomorphism
ϕ : StabΓ (Pk ) → Bl′ ⋉ AutI (c1 ) × .. × AutI (cl )
Choose some Pi =: P different from Pk and observe the arrow ǫ : P → Pk which
is the composition of the ǫj in between. Choose a representing path p : X → Y of
P. Then there is exactly one arrow e : Y → Yk representing ǫ. One can compose p
and pk with transformations η and λ such that λ : Yk → Yk is a tensor product of
degree 1 operations λi : ci → ci and e is a tensor product of chosen operations. Write
p′k = pk λ for the new representative of Pk . To p′k corresponds another isomorphism
ϕ′ : StabΓ (Pk ) → Bl′ ⋉ AutI (c1 ) × .. × AutI (cl )
which differs from ϕ by conjugation with λ. Denote the new representative pη of
P again by p.
Now let γ ∈ StabΓ (Pk ). Then γ fixes also P, i.e. P · γ = P, if and only if
[p′k e−1 ] = [p] = [p] · γ
= [γ −1 p]
= [γ −1 p′k e−1 ]
−1 −1 ′ −1
γ pk e ]
′ −1 −1
[pk tγ e ]
= [p′k p′k
=
−1
where we have set tγ := p′k γp′k , an element in the image of the isomorphism
ϕ′ . Therefore, we have to identify all such tγ which satisfy this equation. In other
words, we look for all tγ such that there is a transformation τ with
etγ = τ e
Roughly speaking, we look for all tγ which can be pulled through e from the
codomain to the domain.
42
WERNER THUMANN
For better readability, we assume without loss of generality that the colors ci
are all equal to one color c. In particular, the codomains of ϕ and ϕ′ are of
the form Bl ⋉ AutI (c)l . Then write e = θ1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ θl where the θi are chosen
operations with codomain the chosen color c. Define Hi to be the subgroup of
AutI (c) consisting of elements h which can be pulled through the operation θi ,
i.e. there exists a transformation τ with θi h = τ θi . Furthermore, let Bl∗ be the
finite index subgroup of Bl consisting of the elements σ with the property θi⊲σ = θi .
Denote by StabΓ (P, Pk ) the subgroup of StabΓ (Pk ) which also fixes P. Then the
isomorphism ϕ′ restricts to an isomorphism
ϕ′P : StabΓ (P, Pk ) → Bl∗ ⋉ (H1 × . . . × Hl ) =: ΛP
where the subgroup Bl∗ still acts via permutation of the factors and this is welldefined due to the definition of Bl∗ . The proof of this is straightforward and uses
the fact that two two-sided transformation equivalent θi must be equal.
Recall that ϕ′ differs from ϕ by conjugation with λ. So the image of StabΓ (P, Pk )
under ϕ is its image under ϕ′ conjugated with λ. More precisely, ϕ restricts to an
isomorphism
ϕP : StabΓ (P, Pk ) → λΛP λ−1 =: ΩP
Consider the pure braid group Pl which is a finite index subgroup of Bl . It is also
a finite index subgroup of Bl∗ . Recall that we have λ = λ1 ⊗ . . . ⊗ λl where the λi
are degree 1 operations. We have
λ Pl ⋉ (H1 × . . . × Hl ) λ−1 = λ Pl × (H1 × . . . × Hl ) λ−1
= Pl × λ1 H1 λ1−1 × . . . × λl Hl λ−1
l
= Pl × H1P × . . . × HlP
where HiP := λi Hi λ−1
is isomorphic to Hi . This is a finite index subgroup of ΩP .
i
Remains to consider the case when γ ∈ StabΓ (Pk ) fixes more than one additional
vertex Pi . For this we have to show that the intersection
ΩP0 ∩ . . . ∩ ΩPk−1 ⊂ Bl ⋉ AutI (c)l
is of type F∞ . For better readability, we assume without loss of generality that
k = 2. Then the last statement is equivalent to
Pl × H1P0 × . . . × HlP0 ∩ Pl × H1P1 × . . . × HlP1 =
Pl × H1P0 ∩ H1P1 × . . . × HlP0 ∩ HlP1
being of type F∞ since it is a finite index subgroup. This is true because Pl is of
type F∞ and all the groups HiP0 ∩ HiP1 are of type F∞ . The latter statement is
+
.
true because the groups HiP0 ∩ HiP1 are subgroups of AutI (c) which is of type F∞
This completes the proof of the proposition.
4.4. Finite type filtration. To apply Brown’s criterion to the Γ-CW-complex
U/G, we need a filtration by Γ-CW-subcomplexes (U/G)n which are of finite type.
Observe that the degree function on S induces degree functions on U and U/G.
Define Sn resp. Un resp. (U/G)n to be the full subcategories spanned by the objects
of degree at most n. Note that we have Un /Gn = (U/G)n where Gn = G ∩ Un . In
the following, we want to show that (U/G)n only has finitely many Γ-equivariant
cells in each dimension.
Choose one operation in each very elementary transformation class and denote
the resulting set of operations by S. By the assumptions in Theorem 4.3, S is a
finite set.
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
43
Observation 4.15. Let θ ∈ S and γ be a degree 1 operation such that θ ∗γ is defined.
Then, by Proposition 3.19, θ ∗ γ is again very elementary and there is a θ′ ∈ S and
a transformation τ with θ ∗ γ = τ ∗ θ′ .
Denote by Ω the set of all identity operations together with all operations of
degree at most n which are obtained by partially composing operations in S. Note
that Ω is finite because S is finite and there are only finitely many colors by assumption. Denote by Λ the set of arrows in Sn which are obtained by taking tensor
products of operations in Ω. Again, the set Λ is finite.
Let Λ∗p ⊂ Λp be the subset of p-tuples of composable arrows in Λ. We claim
that there is a surjective function
Λ∗p ։ p-cells in (U/G)n Γ
which proves that there are only finitely many Γ-equivariant cells in (U/G)n . Let
(e0 , . . . , ep−1 ) ∈ Λ∗p . Choose a path p0 : X → dom(e0 ). Define paths pk : X →
dom(ek ) by the composite pk := p0 e0 . . . ek−1 . The pi represent objects Pi and the
ei represent arrows ǫi : Pi → Pi+1 in (U/G)n . Thus, the sequence ǫ0 , . . . , ǫp−1 gives
a p-cell in (U/G)n . This p-cell surely depends on the choice of p0 but two such
choices give equivalent p-cells modulo the action of Γ. So we get a well-defined
function as above.
Remains to show that this function is indeed surjective. Consider a p-cell in
(U/G)n in the form of a string
ǫ
ǫ
ǫp−1
1
0
· · · −−−→ Pp
P1 −→
P0 −→
of composable arrows in (U/G)n . For each Pi we can choose representatives Pi in
Un . Then each ǫi is represented by a unique arrow ei : Pi → Pi+1 in Un . We now
want to change these representatives so that each ei lies in Λ.
Start with the last arrow ep−1 = [σ, Θ]. Let T be the set of operations of the
form τ ∗ θ where τ is a transformation and θ ∈ S. In other words, T is the set of all
very elementary operations. Each higher degree operation θ in the sequence Θ can
be written, up to transformation, as a partial composition of operations in T (see
the remarks after Definition 3.16). It follows θ = s ∗ ψ where s is a transformation
and ψ is an operation decomposable into operations of the form (γ1 , . . . , γk ) ∗ ξ
with ξ ∈ S and γi of degree 1. Using Observation 4.15, we can pull the degree 1
operations to the domain of ψ, starting with the rightmost degree 1 operations, and
obtain θ = s ∗ ψ where s is a transformation and ψ is an operation decomposable
into operations of S. We now have ep−1 = τ ∗Ψ where τ is some transformation and
Ψ is simply a tensor product of identities or higher degree operations decomposable
into operations of S. By changing the representives Pp−1 , ep−1 and ep−2 in their
respective classes modulo the subgroupoid G, we can assume τ = id and thus that
ep−1 lies in Λ. We can now repeat this argument with ep−2 and then with ep−3 and
so forth until we have changed each ei to lie in Λ. This proves surjectivity.
4.5. Connectivity of the filtration. It remains to show the connectivity statement in Brown’s criterion,
i.e. we have to show that the connectivity of the pair
(U/G)n , (U/G)n−1 tends to infinity as n → ∞. To show this, we apply the Morse
method for categories. The degree function on U/G is a Morse function and the
corresponding filtration is exactly (U/G)n . Thus, we have to prove that the connectivity of the descending link lk↓ (K) tends to infinity as the degree of the object
K tends to infinity. Note that the descending up link lk↓ (K) is always empty, so
we have lk↓ (K) = lk↓ (K).
Definition 4.16. An arrow [σ, Θ] in S is called (very) elementary if it is not a
transformation and every higher degree operation in Θ is (very) elementary. An
44
WERNER THUMANN
arrow in U is called (very) elementary if the corresponding arrow in S is (very) elementary. An arrow in U/G is called (very) elementary if there is a (very) elementary
representative in U.
It follows from Proposition 3.19 that the number of (very) elementary operations
in an arrow a ∈ U does does not change if we replace a by another representative
in the class [a] ∈ U/G. In particular, if the arrow α ∈ U/G is (very) elementary,
then all representing arrows a ∈ U of α are (very) elementary.
The data of an object in lk↓ (K) consists of an object Y in U/G with deg(Y) <
deg(K) and an arrow α : K → Y in U/G. Now we define Core(K) to be the full
subcategory of lk↓ (K) spanned by the objects (Y, α) where α is a very elementary
arrow. Denote by Corona(K) the full subcategory of lk↓ (K) spanned by the objects
(Y, α) with α an elementary arrow. So we have
Core(K) ⊂ Corona(K) ⊂ lk ↓ (K)
and we will study the connectivity of these spaces successively.
4.5.1. The core. In this subsubsection, we adopt the normal form point of view of
Subsection 3.2: Arrows in S are always represented by a unique pair (σ, Θ) such
that σ −1 is unpermuted resp. unbraided on the domains of the operations in the
sequence Θ.
We say that two operations θ1 and θ2 are right transformation equivalent if there
is a transformation γ such that θ2 = θ1 ∗ γ. Recall from Proposition 3.19 that being
elementary or very elementary is invariant under right transformations.
The object K in U/G is a class of objects in U modulo transformations. Fix
some representing object K. Then the objects in Core(K) are in one to one correspondence with pairs (Y, a) where Y is an object in U with deg(Y ) < deg(K)
and a : K → Y is a very elementary arrow in U modulo transformations on the
codomain (compare with Remark 2.6). Choose one operation in each right transformation equivalence class and denote the resulting set of operations by R. We
choose the identity for a class of degree 1 operations so that the degree 1 operations
in R are identities. Now define a very elementary R-arrow to be a very elementary
arrow (σ, Θ) in S such that the operations in Θ are elements of R. Thus, Θ is a
tensor product of identities and at least one very elementary operation lying in R.
This notion of very elementary R-arrows can be lifted to arrows in U. Now the
objects in Core(K) are in one to one correspondence with pairs (Y, a) where Y is
an object with deg(Y ) < deg(K) and a : K → Y is
• (planar case) a very elementary R-arrow.
• (symmetric case) a very elementary R-arrow modulo colored permutations
on the codomain.
• (braided case) a very elementary R-arrow modulo colored braidings on the
codomain.
The equivalence relation modulo braidings on the codomain is called “dangling” in
[9] because these objects may be visualized as a braiding where some strands at
one end are connected by very elementary operations in R, called “feet”, and these
are allowed to dangle freely (see [9, Figure 9]).
Now let C be the set of colors of the operad O. We define a set of archetypes A
as follows: For each operation in R, form an archetype with identifier this operation
and with color word the domain of that operation. The object K in U is a path of
arrows in S modulo homotopy. It starts at the color word X and ends at some other
color word T . Consider the simplicial complex AC d (C, A; T ) from Subsection 4.1.
It can be seen as a poset of simplices with an arrow from a simplex σ to another
simplex σ ′ if and only if σ is a face of σ ′ .
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
45
Proposition 4.17. The category Core(K) is a poset and isomorphic, as a poset, to
AC d (C, A; T ) where d = 1 in the planar case, d = 2 in the braided case and d = 3
in the symmetric case.
Proof. We restrict our attention to the braided case, i.e. d = 2. The other two cases
are much simpler.
First, it is clear that Core(K) is a poset since U/G is a poset. We want to understand the poset structure a bit better: Let Λ be an object of Core(K) in the form
of a very elementary R-arrow K → Y modulo dangling. Fix some very elementary
R-arrow λ representing this class with the property that the colored braiding of
that arrow is unbraided not only on the sets of strands connected to single operations but also on the set of strands connected to identity operations. Then arrows
in Core(K) with domain Λ are in one to one correspondence with very elementary
R-arrows α in U, modulo dangling, such that the very elementary operations of
α only connect to identity operations of λ in the composition λ ∗ α (since compositions of very elementary operations are not very elementary anymore). The
following diagram, in which the gray triangles are identity operations, illustrates
such a situation:
λ α
These considerations yield the following interpretation of the poset structure: We
have Λ → Λ′ if and only if there is a very elementary R-arrow λ representing the
dangling class Λ such that adding very elementary operations of R to loose strands
of λ (i.e. strands connected to identity operations) gives a very elementary R-arrow
representing the dangling class Λ′ .
We will consider an isomorphism of posets
comb : Core(K) → AC2 (C, A; T )
called “combing” as in [9, Section 4] and its inverse
weave: AC2 (C, A; T ) → Core(K)
which we call “weaving”.
To define the first map, start with an object Λ in Core(K). As above, it is a very
elementary R-arrow in normal form modulo dangling. Thus, it is represented by a
colored braid with unbraided strands connected by very elementary operations in
R. Think of the domain of the braid as being fixed on the line
L1 := {(x, 0, 1) | x ∈ R} ⊂ R3
the codomain as being fixed on the line
L0 := {(x, 0, 0) | x ∈ R} ⊂ R3
and visualize the operations as straight lines in L0 connecting the ends of the
corresponding strands. Now “combing straight” the braid means moving around
the ends of the braid in the plane P := R2 × {0} ⊂ R3 such that the whole braid
becomes unbraided. The segments representing the operations get deformed in P
this way and in fact become the archetypal arcs in comb(Λ). They are admissible
46
WERNER THUMANN
because the braid was required to be unbraided on the domains of the operations.
This process is visualized in [9, Figure 17]. Note that combing does not depend
on the representative under dangling, so it is a well-defined map on the objects of
Core(K). It also respects the poset structures, so it is a map of posets.
To define the second map, start with an archetypal arc system A. This is a priori
embedded in R2 but embed it in R3 via the embedding R2 × {0} ⊂ R3 . Connect
the nodes of the archetypal arc system with the line L1 by straight lines parallel
to the third coordinate axis. The process of weaving first tries to separate the
archetypal arcs by moving the nodes in the plane P . Here, being separate means
being separated by a straight line in P parallel to the second coordinate axis. Also,
the set of nodes which are not contained in an arc should be separated from the
arcs. By doing these moves, the vertical strands connecting the nodes with the line
L1 become braided in a certain way. The separation process is always possible but
the resulting braid is not unique (think of two nodes connected by an arc and turn
around the arc several times). To make the resulting braid unique (up to dangling),
we additionally require that the subbraid determined by an archetypal arc never
becomes braided during the separation process. This can be achieved for example
by the following additional movement rule: The nodes of an archetypal arc always
have to stay on the same line L in P parallel to the first coordinate axis. This line L
may move up and down and the nodes of the archetypal arc may move left and right
on L but they must never cross each other on L. Then, when the archetypal arcs
are separated from each other and from the isolated nodes, the property admissible
of the archetypal arcs ensures that they can be homotoped to straight lines lying
in L0 . The following figure visualizes this process:
Replacing the archetypal arcs by the identifier operations of the corresponding
archetype yields a representative of weave(A) and the class modulo dangling does
not depend on the weaving process. Thus, we get a well-defined map on the objects
of AC 2 (C, A; T ). It also respects the poset structures, so it is a map of posets.
It follows from the finiteness of V E that the set of archetypes A is of finite type
(though not finite in general) and from the color-tameness of O that it is tame.
More precisely, let mV be the largest degree of very elementary classes and mC
be the smallest natural number greater than the degree of any reduced object in
S. Then we can set ma = mV and mr = mC in Theorem 4.9. We thus get the
following
Corollary 4.18. Core(K) is νd (deg K)-connected where
l − mC
−1
ν1 (l) :=
2mV + mC − 2
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
47
l − mC
−1
2mV − 1
l − mC
ν3 (l) :=
−1
2mV − 1
ν2 (l) :=
Here, d = 1 corresponds to the planar case, d = 2 to the braided case and d = 3 to
the symmetric case.
4.5.2. The corona. We build up Corona(K) from Core(K) using again the Morse
method for categories. We then get a connectivity result for the corona from the
connectivity result for the core. The idea is attributed to [20].
We assumed O to be of finite type, i.e. the set of elementary classes E is finite.
Let mE be the largest degree of elementary classes. An object in Corona(K) is a
pair (Y, α : K → Y) where deg(Y) < deg(K) and α is an elementary arrow in U/G.
For 2 ≤ k ≤ mE denote by #kse (α) the number of strictly elementary operations of
degree k in any representative of α. Define
mE −1
E
(α), . . . , #2se (α), deg(Y)
f (Y, α) := #m
se (α), #se
Order the values of f lexicographically. Then f becomes a Morse function building
up Corona(K) from Core(K). Define
l − mC
−2
µ1 (l) :=
2mV + mC + mE
l − mC
µ2 (l) :=
−1
2mV + mE
l − mC
−1
µ3 (l) :=
2mV + mE
Proposition 4.19. For each object (Y, α) in Corona(K) which is not an object in
Core(K), the descending link lk↓ (Y, α) with respect to the Morse function f above
is µd (deg K)-connected.
From Theorem 2.20 we get that Core(K) and Corona(K) share the same homotopy groups up to dimension µd (deg K). We already know that Core(K) is
νd (deg K)-connected. Furthermore, we have νd (l) ≥ µd (l). Consequently, we get
the following
Corollary 4.20. Corona(K) is µd (deg K)-connected. In particular, its connectivity
tends to infinity as deg(K) → ∞.
In the rest of this subsubsection, we give a proof of Proposition 4.19. We distinguish between two sorts of objects (Y, α) in Corona(K) which are not objects
in Core(K): Such an object is called mixed if there is at least one very elementary
operation in α. It is called pure if there is no very elementary operation in α.
Lemma 4.21. Let (Y, α) be mixed. Then lk↓ (Y, α) and therefore lk↓ (Y, α) is
contractible. In particular, Proposition 4.19 is true for mixed objects.
Proof. The data of an object in lk ↓ (Y, α) is Ω = (L, β1 ), β2 where L is an object in
U/G, β1 is an elementary arrow in U/G, β2 is an arrow in U/G such that β1 β2 = α
and (L, β1 ) forms an object in Corona(K) of strictly smaller Morse height than
(Y, α). Let Ω′ = (L′ , β1′ ), β2′ be another such object. An arrow Ω → Ω′ is
48
WERNER THUMANN
represented by an arrow δ : L → L′ such that β1 δ = β1′ and δβ2′ = β2 .
α
/
K ❄❚❚❚❚
❥❥❥⑦5? Y
❥
❄❄ ❚❚❚❚
❥
❥
❚❚❚❚
❄❄
❥❥❥ ⑦⑦⑦
❚❚❚❚
❄❄
❥❥❥❥
⑦
❥
❥
′
❚
❥
❄❄
β
❚❚❚❚ ❥❥❥
2
β
⑦⑦β ′
β1
⑦
❥
❄❄ 1
❚
❥
⑦ 2
❚❚❚❚
❄
❥❥❥❥
⑦⑦
❚❚❚)
❥
❥
❥
/ L′
L❥
δ
It follows that lk ↓ (Y, α) is a poset since U/G is a poset.
Choose representatives K and Y of K and Y. Then α is represented by a unique
arrow a : K → Y . We can choose K such that a is a tensor product of higher
degree operations and identities. Let av : K → Y v be the arrow obtained from a
by replacing all strictly elementary operations θ with deg(θ) identity operations.
Let ase : Y v → Y be the arrow obtained from a by replacing all very elementary
operations by one identity operation each. We have av ase = a. An example of
a, av , ase is pictured below. There, a white triangle is a placeholder for a strictly
elementary operation. A black triangle indicates a very elementary operation. A
straight horizontal line represents an identity operation.
av
a
ase
Set Y v := [Y v ] and αv := [av ] as well as αse := [ase ]. Then (Y v , αv ) is an object in
Core(K) and αse represents an arrow (Y v , αv ) → (Y, α) in Corona(K). Moreover,
the pair Ξ := (Y v , αv ), αse is an object in lk↓ (Y, α).
Let Ω = (L, β1 ), β2 be an object in lk↓ (Y, α). We define another object F (Ω) =
(M, γ1 ), γ2 of lk↓ (Y, α) as follows: Choose a representative L of L such that β2
is represented by b2 : L → Y which is a tensor product of identities and higher
degree operations. Then β1 is represented by a unique b1 : K → L. Note that
b1 b2 = a. Think of b1 as splitting higher degree operations of a into operations of
smaller degree and of b2 as merging them back to their original form. Now define
the arrows g1 : K → M and g2 : M → Y to be the same splitting of a with the only
exception that no very elementary operation of a is splitted. An example fitting
to the example above is pictured below. There, a gray triangle is a placeholder
for an elementary operation or a degree 1 operation, a blue triangle can be any
operation and a dot on a straight horizontal line indicates a possibly non-trivial
degree 1 operation.
b1
b2
g1
Now set M := [M ] and γ1 := [g1 ] as well as γ2 = [g2 ].
g2
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
49
It is not hard to see that Ω 7→ F (Ω) extends to a functor lk↓ (Y, α) → lk↓ (Y, α)
which means that whenever we have an arrow δ : Ω → Ω′ , then there is an arrow
∆ : F (Ω) → F (Ω′ ).
M′
✈: O ●●●
✈
●●
✈✈ ∆
●●
✈✈
● ′
✈
′
M
γ1 ✈✈
6
P
P
♥
PPP ●●●γ●2
✈ ♥♥♥♥
✈
P
PPP ●●●
✈✈ ♥♥
P ●
✈✈♥♥♥♥γ1♥
✈
γ2 PPPP ●●
✈♥♥♥
PPP●●
✈
P#(
✈✈♥♥
♥
α
K ❅❯
❖❖❯❖❯❯❯
✐4/? E Y
✐
✐
✐
❅❅ ❖❖ ❯❯❯❯
✐✐✐✐ ⑧⑧☛
❅❅ ❖❖❖ ❯❯❯❯ β1′
✐✐se✐✐ ′ ⑧⑧⑧☛☛☛
❅❅ ❖❖❖ ❯❯❯❯
✐
✐
✐
❯❯ ✐✐
α
❖❖❖
β2 ⑧⑧ ☛
αv ❅❅❅
❖✐❖✐❖✐✐✐✐❯✐❯❯❯❯❯❯
⑧ ☛☛
✐
❯
❖
✐
❯* ′ ⑧ ☛☛ β2
❖❖❖
v ✐
LO ☛☛
Y
❖❖❖
❖❖❖
☛
δ
❖❖❖ ☛☛
β1
'
L
We also have arrows ξΩ : Ξ → F (Ω) and ιΩ : Ω → F (Ω).
6M❖
♥♥♥ ✌✌F W✵✵✵ ❖❖❖❖❖
♥
♥
❖❖❖γ2
γ1 ♥♥♥
✌
✵✵
❖❖❖
ιΩ
ξΩ ✌✌
♥♥♥
✵
♥
❖❖❖
♥
✌
✵✵
♥♥
✌
❖❖'
♥
♥
✌
♥
α
✵✵
✌
K ❆❯❯❯❯
✌
✐4/ Y
✐
✵
✐
✌
❆❆ ❯❯❯❯❯ ✌
✵✵ ✐✐✐✐✐ ⑧⑧?
✐
se
❆❆ β1 ❯❯❯✌✌❯
✐✵✐ α ⑧⑧
❆❆
⑧
✌ ❯❯❯❯❯❯✐✐✐✐✐✐✐ ✵✵
❆❆ ✌✌
❯
αv
✐
⑧⑧ β2
❯
✐
✵
❯
✐
⑧
❯
✐
❯
✌ ✐✐✐✐
❯❯❯* ⑧
L
Yv
The arrow ξΩ is represented by an arrow xΩ : Y v → M which satisfies av xΩ = g1 and
xΩ g2 = ase . The arrow ιΩ is represented by iΩ : L → M which satisfies b1 iΩ = g1
and iΩ g2 = b2 . In the example from above, these arrows look as follows:
xΩ
iΩ
The claim of the proposition now follows from item iii) in Subsection 2.5 applied
to the functor F and the object Ξ.
Lemma 4.22. Let (Y, α) be pure. Then lk↓ (Y, α) is µd (deg K)-connected and
Proposition 4.19 is true for pure objects.
Proof. Choose representatives K and Y of K and Y such that a : K → Y representing α is a tensor product of higher degree operations and identities.
First observe
the descending up link lk↓ (Y, α). An object in lk ↓ (Y, α) is a pair
(L, β1 ), β2 with f (L, β1 ) < f (Y, α) and β1 β2 = α. When choosing a representative L of L, we get unique representatives b1 : K → L of β1 and b2 : L → Y of β2
such that b1 b2 = a. As in the proof of the previous lemma, b1 can be interpreted
as splitting higher degree operations of a into operations of smaller degree and b2
as merging them back to their original form. Denote by Ai the full subcategory of
lk↓ (Y, α) spanned by the objects which only split the i’th higher degree operation
50
WERNER THUMANN
in a. Denote by n the number of higher degree operations in a. Observe now that
when splitting operations in a one by one, then we can also split all that operations
at once. This observation reveals that
lk↓ (Y, α) = A1 ◦ . . . ◦ An
is the Grothendieck join of the Ai (see Subsection 2.9). Note that the categories
Ai are all non-empty since all the higher degree operations in a are elementary but
not very elementary and splitting such a strictly elementary operation decreases
the Morse height. Thus, lk ↓ (Y, α) is (n − 2)-connected.
Now look at the descending down link lk↓ (Y, α). Objects are pairs (L, β1 ), β2
with f (L, β1 ) < f (Y, α) and αβ2 = β1 . When choosing a representative L of L,
we get unique representatives b1 : K → L of β1 and b2 : Y → L of β2 such that
ab2 = b1 . Looking at the Morse function f for the corona, one sees that the higher
degree operations of b2 must be very elementary operations which only compose
with identity operations of a. At this point, we have to distinguish between the
planar case on the one hand and the braided resp. symmetric case on the other.
We start with the braided resp. symmetric case: The arguments in the proof of
Proposition 4.17 reveal that lk ↓ (Y, α) is isomorphic to AC d (C, A; T ′ ) where T ′ is
the color word obtained from the codomain of a (viewed as an arrow in S) after
deleting the higher degree operations. Denote by l the length of T ′ , i.e. the number
of identity operations in a. Then we already know that AC d (C, A; T ′ ) is νd (l)connected (compare with Corollary 4.18). Consequently, the connectivity of the
descending link lk↓ (Y, α) = lk↓ (Y, α) ∗ lk↓ (Y, α) is
l − mC
−1
n + νd (l) = n +
2mV − 1
deg K − nmE − mC
−1
≥n+
2mV − 1
deg K − nmE − mC
≥n+
−1
2mV + mE
deg K − mC + 2mV n
=
−1
2mV + mE
deg K − mC
−1
≥
2mV + mE
= µd (deg K)
where we have used that nmE + l ≥ deg K.
Now we turn to the planar case: An identity component in a is a maximal
subsequence of identity operations. Let m be the number of identity components
and denote by li for i = 1, . . . , m the length of the i’th identity component. Denote
by l the total number of identity operations in a, i.e. the sum of the li . Define Bi
to be the full subcategory of lk ↓ (Y, α) spanned by the objects which only add very
elementary operations into the i’th identity component. Observe now that when
adding very elementary operations into different identity components one by one,
then we can also add all that operations at once. This reveals that lk↓ (Y, α) is the
Grothendieck join of the Bi . Note, though, when inspecting the direction of the
arrows in lk↓ (Y, α), one sees that it is in fact the dual Grothendieck join. So we
have
lk ↓ (Y, α) = B1 • . . . • Bm
Similarly as in the braided resp. symmetric case, Bi is isomorphic to AC 1 (C, A; Ti )
where Ti is the color word obtained from the codomain of a after deleting all
operations except the identity operations of the i’th identity component. The length
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
51
of Ti is li . Then we already know that AC 1 (C, A; Ti ) is ν1 (li )-connected. Therefore,
the connectivity of lk↓ (Y, α) is at least
2m − 2 +
m
X
ν1 (lj )
j=1
Thus, the connectivity of lk↓ (Y, α) is at least
n + 2m − 2 +
m
X
ν1 (lj ) ≥ n + m − 2 +
j=1
≥n−2+
m
X
lj − mC
2mV + mC
j=1
m
X
lj − mC
2mV + mC
j=1
l − mmC
2mV + mC
deg K − nmE − (n + 1)mC
≥n−2+
2mV + mC
deg K − nmE − nmC − mC
−2
≥n+
2mV + mC + mE
deg K − mC + 2mV n
=
−2
2mV + mC + mE
deg K − mC
≥
−2
2mV + mC + mE
≥ µ1 (deg K)
=n−2+
where we have used in the fourth step that m ≤ n + 1 and nmE + l ≥ deg K.
4.5.3. The whole link. In this last step, we show that the inclusion
Corona(K) ⊂ lk↓ (K)
is a homotopy equivalence. It then follows from Corollary 4.20 that the connectivity
of lk↓ (K) tends to infinity as deg(K) → ∞ which is what we wanted to show in
order to finish the proof of Theorem 4.3. This step is analogous to the reduction to
the Stein space of elementary intervals in [39]. We again apply the Morse method
for categories to build lk↓ (K) up from Corona(K). The Morse function on objects
of lk ↓ (K) which do not lie in Corona(K) is given by
f (Y, α) := − deg(Y)
We have lk↓ (Y, α) = ∅ and thus lk↓ (Y, α) = lk↓ (Y, α) with respect to this Morse
function. Similarly as in the proofs of Lemmas 4.21 and 4.22, we obtain
lk↓ (Y, α) = A1 ◦ . . . ◦ An
where the Ai are full subcategories of lk↓ (Y, α) spanned by the objects which correspond to splitting exactly one of the n higher degree operations in a representative
a of α. At least one of these operations must be non-elementary since (Y, α) is not
an object in Corona(K). Without loss of generality, assume that A1 corresponds to
such a non-elementary higher degree operation. If we show that A1 is contractible,
it follows that lk↓ (Y, α) is contractible. Thus, we are building lk ↓ (K) up from
Corona(K) along contractible descending links and it follows from Theorem 2.20
that the inclusion Corona(K) ⊂ lk↓ (K) is a homotopy equivalence. That A1 is
contractible follows from Proposition 4.24 below.
First, we want to reinterprete the defining property of E as the spine of T C ∗ (O)
in terms of the category U/G.
52
WERNER THUMANN
Lemma 4.23. Let α : K → Y be a non-elementary arrow in U/G such that deg(K) =
n > 1 and deg(Y) = 1. Then there is a unique pair (α1 , α2 ) of arrows in U/G (called
the maximal elementary factorization of α) such that α2 is elementary, α1 α2 = α
and such that the following universal property is satisfied: Whenever (β1 , β2 ) is
another pair with β2 elementary and β1 β2 = α (called an elementary factorization
of α), then there is a unique arrow γ with α1 γ = β1 and γβ2 = α2 .
K
✌ ✶✶✶
✌
✶✶
✌
✶✶
✌✌
✌
α1 ✌
✶✶β1
α
✌
✶✶
✌
✌
✶✶
✌
✌✌
/
o
Q α2 Y
P
A
β
2
❄
⑧
❏ γ t
❚ ❴ ❥
Proof. Recall that U/G is a poset. So there is at most one such γ. If also (β1 , β2 )
satisfies the universal property, then we must have Q = P and consequently α1 = β1
as well as α2 = β2 . This shows the uniqueness statements.
Remains to prove the existence of such a pair: Choose representatives K, Y of
K, Y. Then α is represented by a unique arrow a : K → Y . Note that a is just an
operation since deg(Y ) = 1. Denote the transformation class of a by Ω. Its degree
is deg(K) = n > 1 and it is non-elementary by assumption. Thus, by the definition
of E as the spine, there is a greatest elementary class Θ with the property Θ < Ω.
This implies that there is an operation θ ∈ Θ and an arrow q in S such that q ∗θ = a
in S. Define Q := K ∗ q as an object in U and further Q := [Q] as an object in
U/G. The arrows q : K → Q resp. θ : Q → Y in U represent arrows α1 resp. α2 in
U/G such that α1 α2 = α and α2 is elementary.
These two arrows satisfy the universal property: Let b1 : K → P and b2 : P → Y
be representatives of β1 : K → P and β2 : P → Y. Obviously, the transformation
class [b2 ] of b2 is elementary and satisfies [b2 ] < [a] = Ω. Since Θ = [θ] is the
greatest such class, we obtain [b2 ] ≤ [θ]. This means that there is an arrow g in
S such that g ∗ b2 = θ in S. If g is interpreted as an arrow Q → P in U, then it
represents an arrow γ : Q → Y in U/G which satisfies γβ2 = α2 . We then also have
α1 γ = β1 since U/G is a poset.
We now turn to the announced proposition which concludes the proof of the
main theorem.
Proposition 4.24. Let α : K → Y be a non-elementary arrow in U/G such that
deg(K) = n > 1 and deg(Y) = 1. Let M be the full subcategory of K↓(U/G)n−1
spanned by the objects (Z, β : K → Z) with deg(Z) > 1 and
L := M↓(Y, α)
the descending up link of (Y, α) with respect to the Morse function f above. Then
L is contractible.
Proof. Note that the data of an object of L is a non-trivial factorization of α, i.e. a
pair (α1 , α2 ) of arrows in U/G such that α1 6= id 6= α2 and α1 α2 = α. An arrow
from (α1 , α2 ) to (β1 , β2 ) is an arrow γ such that α1 γ = β1 and γβ2 = α2 . Clearly,
L is a poset.
Apply Lemma 4.23 above to obtain a maximal elementary factorization (α1 , α2 )
of α. Note that (α1 , α2 ) is an object of L and the universal property says that this
object is initial among the objects (β1 , β2 ) of L with β2 elementary.
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
53
More generally, for an object (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) of L with ǫ2 non-elementary, we can apply
the lemma to obtain a maximal elementary factorization (ǫ∗1 , ǫ∗2 ) of ǫ2 . Then define
F (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) := (ǫ1 ǫ∗1 , ǫ∗2 ) which is again an object in L. If ǫ2 is already elementary, we
set ǫ∗1 = id and ǫ∗2 = ǫ2 so that F (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) = (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ).
We claim that F extends to a functor L → L. So let (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) and (β1 , β2 ) be two
objects of L and γ : (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) → (β1 , β2 ) an arrow in L. We have to show that there
is an arrow ϕ : F (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) → F (β1 , β2 ).
•
⑧ ❅❅❅ β1
⑧
❅❅
⑧
❅❅
⑧⑧
α
⑧ γ
⑧
/ •
•❅
❅❅
⑧
⑧
❅❅
ǫ∗
⑧⑧ β1∗
1
⑧
ǫ2 ❅❅
β
⑧⑧ 2
• ∗ / • o ∗ B•
β2
❂ ǫ2
❍ ϕ ✈ ✁
❚❴❥
ǫ1
Observe first that if ǫ∗1 = id, then γβ1∗ is an arrow F (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) → F (β1 , β2 ) as required.
Else, observe that the pair (γβ1∗ , β2∗ ) is another elementary factorization of ǫ2 . Thus,
by the universal property, we get a unique arrow ϕ such that ϕβ2∗ = ǫ∗2 and ǫ∗1 ϕ =
γβ1∗ . This amounts to an arrow F (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) → F (β1 , β2 ).
Since F (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) is an elementary factorization of α, we get an arrow (α1 , α2 ) →
F (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) for each object (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) in L. Furthermore, ǫ∗1 clearly gives an arrow
(ǫ1 , ǫ2 ) → F (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ). The claim of the proposition now follows from item iii) in
Subsection 2.5 applied to the functor F and the object (α1 , α2 ).
4.6. Applications.
4.6.1. Suboperads of endomorphism operads. Consider the example with squares
and triangles, the cube cutting operads (planar or symmetric) and the local similarity operads from Subsubsection 3.5.2. There, we have seen that they all satisfy
the cancellative calculus of fractions. The squares and triangles operad and the
cube cutting operads are of finite type. The local similarity operads are of finite
type if and only if there are only finitely many SimX -equivalence classes of balls,
so we will assume this in the following. Then, in all three cases, the groupoid I(O)
is finite.
In order to apply Theorem 4.3, it therefore remains to check color-tameness.
The cube cutting operads are monochromatic, so color-tameness is trivially satisfied
here. The squares and triangles operad has two colors (the square and the triangle).
It is easy to check that any sequence of at least five squares and triangles is the
domain of a very elementary arrow in S(O). Consequently, it is color-tame as well.
In general, a local similarity operad is not color-tame.
As a special case, we obtain that the higher dimensional Thompson groups nV
are of type F∞ . This has been shown before in [20].
The one dimensional cube cutting operads (planar or symmetric) with trivial
groupoid of degree 1 operations yield the groups of piecewise linear homeomorphisms of the unit (Cantor) interval studied in [39] and from the main theorem, it
follows that they are of type F∞ . This has already been shown in [39].
The finiteness result for the local similarity groups has also been obtained in
[16, Theorem 6.5]. The hypothesis in this theorem consists of demanding that the
finite similarity structure posseses only finitely many SimX -equivalence classes of
balls and of the property rich in simple contractions which is implied by the easier
to state property rich in ball contractions [16, Definition 5.12]. It is not hard to see
54
WERNER THUMANN
that the latter property exactly means that O, the local similarity operad associated
to SimX , is color-tame.
4.6.2. Ribbon Thompson group. The braided operad O with transformations discussed in Subsubsection 3.5.3 satisfies the cancellative calculus of fractions. It is
monochromatic and therefore color-tame. There is only one very elementary transformation class and thus, O is of finite type. The groupoid I(O) is the group Z
+
which is of type F∞
. The main theorem yields that the Ribbon Thompson group
RV is of type F∞ .
References
[1] J. Bénabou, Some remarks on 2-categorical algebra. I, Bull. Soc. Math. Belg. Sér. A 41
(1989), no. 2, 127–194.
[2] M. Bestvina and N. Brady, Morse theory and finiteness properties of groups, Invent. Math.
129 (1997), no. 3, 445–470.
[3] F. Borceux, Handbook of categorical algebra. 1, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 50, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
[4] M. G. Brin, Higher dimensional Thompson groups, Geom. Dedicata 108 (2004), 163–192.
[5]
, The algebra of strand splitting. I. A braided version of Thompson’s group V , J.
Group Theory 10 (2007), no. 6, 757–788.
[6] M. G. Brin and C. C. Squier, Groups of piecewise linear homeomorphisms of the real line,
Invent. Math. 79 (1985), no. 3, 485–498.
[7] K. S. Brown, Finiteness properties of groups, Proceedings of the Northwestern conference on
cohomology of groups (Evanston, Ill., 1985), 1987, pp. 45–75.
[8] K. S. Brown and R. Geoghegan, An infinite-dimensional torsion-free FP∞ group, Invent.
Math. 77 (1984), no. 2, 367–381.
[9] K.-U. Bux, M. G. Fluch, M. Marschler, S. Witzel, and M. C. B. Zaremsky, The braided
Thompson’s groups are of type F∞ , arXiv:1210.2931v2 (2014).
[10] D.-C. Cisinski, La classe des morphismes de Dwyer n’est pas stable par retractes, Cahiers
Topologie Géom. Différentielle Catég. 40 (1999), no. 3, 227–231 (French, with English summary).
[11] W. G. Dwyer and D. M. Kan, Calculating simplicial localizations, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 18
(1980), no. 1, 17–35.
[12] J. Dydak, A simple proof that pointed FANR-spaces are regular fundamental retracts of
ANR’s, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. 25 (1977), no. 1, 55–62
(English, with Russian summary).
[13] D. S. Farley, Actions of picture groups on CAT(0) cubical complexes, Geom. Dedicata 110
(2005), 221–242.
, Finiteness and CAT(0) properties of diagram groups, Topology 42 (2003), no. 5,
[14]
1065–1082.
[15]
, Homological and finiteness properties of picture groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
357 (2005), no. 9, 3567–3584 (electronic).
[16] D. S. Farley and B. Hughes, Finiteness properties of some groups of local similarities, Proc.
Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 58 (2015), no. 2, 379–402.
[17] Z. Fiedorowicz, A counterexample to a group completion conjecture of J. C. Moore, Algebr.
Geom. Topol. 2 (2002), 33–35 (electronic).
[18] M. Fiore and T. Leinster, An abstract characterization of Thompson’s group F , Semigroup
Forum 80 (2010), no. 2, 325–340.
[19] T. M. Fiore, W. Lück, and R. Sauer, Euler characteristics of categories and homotopy colimits, Doc. Math. 16 (2011), 301–354.
[20] M. G. Fluch, M. Marschler, S. Witzel, and M. C. B. Zaremsky, The Brin-Thompson groups
sV are of type F∞ , Pacific J. Math. 266 (2013), no. 2, 283–295.
[21] P. Freyd and A. Heller, Splitting homotopy idempotents. II, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 89 (1993),
no. 1-2, 93–106.
[22] P. Gabriel and M. Zisman, Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 35, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, 1967.
[23] R. Geoghegan, Topological methods in group theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 243,
Springer, New York, 2008.
[24] P. G. Goerss and J. F. Jardine, Simplicial homotopy theory, Modern Birkhäuser Classics,
Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009.
[25] V. Guba and M. Sapir, Diagram groups, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 130 (1997), no. 620.
OPERAD GROUPS AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES
55
[26] B. Hughes, Local similarities and the Haagerup property, Groups Geom. Dyn. 3 (2009), no. 2,
299–315. With an appendix by Daniel S. Farley.
[27] A. Joyal and R. Street, Braided tensor categories, Adv. Math. 102 (1993), no. 1, 20–78.
, The geometry of tensor calculus. I, Adv. Math. 88 (1991), no. 1, 55–112.
[28]
[29] W. Lück, The type of the classifying space for a family of subgroups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra
149 (2000), no. 2, 177–203.
[30] S. Mac Lane, Categories for the working mathematician, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
[31] D. McDuff, On the classifying spaces of discrete monoids, Topology 18 (1979), no. 4, 313–320.
[32] N. Monod, Groups of piecewise projective homeomorphisms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110
(2013), no. 12, 4524–4527.
[33] R. Paré, Universal covering categories, Rend. Istit. Mat. Univ. Trieste 25 (1993), no. 1-2,
391–411 (1994).
[34] D. Quillen, Higher algebraic K-theory. I, Springer, Berlin, 1973, pp. 85–147. Lecture Notes
in Math., Vol. 341.
[35]
, Homotopy properties of the poset of nontrivial p-subgroups of a group, Adv. in Math.
28 (1978), no. 2, 101–128.
[36] P. Selinger, A survey of graphical languages for monoidal categories, New structures for
physics, Lecture Notes in Phys., vol. 813, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 289–355.
[37] E. H. Spanier, Algebraic topology, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York-Toronto, Ont.-London,
1966.
[38] C. C. Squier, The homological algebra of Artin groups, Math. Scand. 75 (1994), no. 1, 5–43.
[39] M. Stein, Groups of piecewise linear homeomorphisms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 332 (1992),
no. 2, 477–514.
[40] R. W. Thomason, Cat as a closed model category, Cahiers Topologie Géom. Différentielle 21
(1980), no. 3, 305–324.
[41]
, Homotopy colimits in the category of small categories, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 85 (1979), no. 1, 91–109.
[42] W. Thumann, Operad groups, PhD thesis, KIT Karlsruhe, 2015. urn:nbn:de:swb:90-454145.
[43] M. Weiss, What does the classifying space of a category classify?, Homology Homotopy Appl.
7 (2005), no. 1, 185–195.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
| 4math.GR
|
RESEARCH
REPORT
N° 8581
March 2015
Project-Teams Neo
ISRN INRIA/RR--8581--FR+ENG
Konstantin Avrachenkov, Alexey Piunovskiy,
Yi Zhang
ISSN 0249-6399
arXiv:1503.08548v2 [cs.PF] 10 Mar 2017
Hitting Times in Markov
Chains with Restart
and their Application to
Network Centrality
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
and their Application to Network Centrality
Konstantin Avrachenkov∗ , Alexey Piunovskiy† ,
Yi Zhang‡
Project-Teams Neo
Research Report n° 8581 — March 2015 — 17 pages
Abstract:
Motivated by applications in telecommunications, computer science and physics,
we consider a discrete-time Markov process with restart. At each step the process either with
a positive probability restarts from a given distribution, or with the complementary probability
continues according to a Markov transition kernel. The main contribution of the present work is
that we obtain an explicit expression for the expectation of the hitting time (to a given target set) of
the process with restart. The formula is convenient when considering the problem of optimization
of the expected hitting time with respect to the restart probability. We illustrate our results
with two examples in uncountable and countable state spaces and with an application to network
centrality.
Key-words:
Centrality
∗
†
‡
Discrete-time Markov Process with Restart, Expected Hitting Time, Network
Inria Sophia Antipolis, France, [email protected]
University of Liverpool, United Kingdom, [email protected]
University of Liverpool, United Kingdom, [email protected]
RESEARCH CENTRE
SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS – MÉDITERRANÉE
2004 route des Lucioles - BP 93
06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
Le Temps de Premier Passage dans les Processus de Markov
avec Redémarrage et leur Application à la Mesure de
Centralité de Réseau
Résumé :
Motivé par diverses applications provenant de télécommunications, informatique
et de la physique, nous considerons un processus generale de Markov dans l’espace de Borel avec
une possibilité de redémarrage. À chaque étape, avec une probabilité le processus redémarre
a partir d’une distribution donnée et avec la probabilité complémentaire le processus continue
l’évolution selon une noyau de Markov. Nous étudions l’espérance du temps de premier passage
à l’ensemble donné. Nous obtenons une formule explicite pour l’espérance du temps de premier
passage et démontrons que le processus avec redémarrage est Harris positif récurrent. Ensuite,
nous établissons que les assertions suivantes sont équivalentes : (a) le fait d’être limité (par
rapport à l’état initiale) de l’espérance du temps de premier passage; (b) la finitude de l’espérance
du temps de premier passage pour presque tous les états initiaux par rapport à la probabilité
invariante unique; et, (c) l’ensemble cible est de mesure positive par rapport à la probabilité
invariante. Enfin, nous illustrons nos résultats théoriques avec deux exemples dans les espaces
dénombrables et non dénombrables et avec l’application à la mesure de centralité de réseau.
Mots-clés :
Processus de Markov en Temps Discret, L’Espérance du Temps de Premier
Passage, La Mesure de Centralité de Réseau
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
1
3
Introduction
We give a self-contained study of a discrete-time Markov process with restart. At each step
the process either with the positive probability p restarts from a given distribution, or with
the complementary probability 1 − p continues according to a Markov transition kernel. Such
processes have many applications in telecommunications, computer science and physics. Let us
cite just a few. Both TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) and HTTP (Hypertext Transfer
Protocol) can be viewed as protocols restarting from time to time, [16], [20]. The PageRank
network centrality [10], in information retrieval, models the behaviour of an Internet user surfing
the web and restarting from a new topic from time to time. The sybil attack resistant network
centralities based on the hitting times of a random walk with restart have been proposed in
[14, 18]. Markov processes with restart are useful for the analysis of replace and restart types
protocols in computer reliability, [2], [3], [17]. The restart policy is also used to speedup the Las
Vegas type randomized algorithms [1], [19]. Finally, human and animal mobility patterns can be
modeled by Markov processes that restart from some locations [12], [24].
The main focus of the present work is the expectation of the hitting time (to a given target
set) of the process with restart, for which we obtain simple explicit expressions in terms of the
expected discounted hitting time of the original process without restart; see Theorem 2.1. These
formula is useful in the optimization of the expected hitting time with respect to the restart
probability. In addition, the formulae allow us to either refine, or give simple and self-contained
proofs of the stability results for the process with restart in terms of hitting times. Finally, in
Section 3, we illustrate the main results with two examples in uncountable and countable state
spaces and with an application to network centrality. In particular, we show that the hitting
time based network centrality can be more discerning than PageRank.
Let us mention some related work to the present one in the current literature. The continuoustime Markov process with restart was considered in [7]. According to Theorem 2.2 in [7], the
continuous-time Markov process with restart is positive Harris recurrent in case the original
process is honest. At the same time, the process with restart is not positive Harris recurrent if
the original process is not honest (i.e., the transition kernel is substochastic; in case the state
space is countable, that means the accumulation of jumps). The objective of [7] does not lie
in the expected hitting time, but in the representation of the transition probability function of
the (continuous-time) process with restart in terms of the one of the original (continuous-time)
process without restart. This is trivial in the present discrete-time setup. Here our focus is
on the characterization of the expected hitting time. We also would like to mention the two
works [11] and [15], dealing with the control theoretic formulation, where the controller decides
(dynamically) whether it is beneficial or not to perform a restart at the current state. That line
of research can be considered complementary to ours.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The description of the process with restart
and the main statements are presented in Section 2, which are illustrated by two examples and
network centrality application in Section 3. The paper is finished with a conclusion in Section 4.
2
Main statements
Let us introduce the model formally. As in [21], let E be a nonempty locally compact Borel
state space endowed with its Borel σ-algebra B(E). Consider a discrete-time Markov chain X̃ =
{X̃t , t = 0, 1, . . . } in the state space E with the transition probability function P̃ (x, dy) being
defined by
P̃ (x, Γ) := pν(Γ) + (1 − p)P (x, Γ),
RR n° 8581
(1)
4
K. Avrachenkov & A. Piunovskiy & Y. Zhang
for each Γ ∈ B(E), where p ∈ (0, 1) and P (x, dy) is a transition probability function, and ν is a
probability measure on B(E). Let X := {Xt , t = 0, 1, . . . } denote the Markov chain corresponding
to the transition probability P (x, dy). We assume the two processes X and X̃ are defined on
the common probability space (Ω, F, P); if we emphasize that the initial state is x ∈ E, then Ex
denotes the corresponding expectation operator, and the notation Px is similarly understood.
The process X̃ is understood as the modified version of the process X, and is obtained by
restarting (independently of anything else) the process X after each transition with probability
p ∈ (0, 1) and the distribution of the state after each restart being given by ν; whereas if there
is no restart after the transition (with probability 1 − p), the distribution of the post-transition
state is P (x, dy) (given that the current state is x).
The following notation is used throughout this paper. Let P t (x, dy), t = 0, 1, . . . , be defined
iteratively as follows; for each Γ ∈ B(E),
P 0 (x, Γ)
P t+1 (x, Γ)
:= I{x ∈ Γ},
Z
:=
P t (x, dy)P (y, Γ).
E
The power of other kernels is understood similarly.
Finally, thoughout this paper, the convention 0 · +∞ := 0 is in use.
2.1
Known facts
The materials in this subsection are standard and known from [21]. The purpose here is to give
a short and self-contained presentation. The main result of this paper is postponed to the next
subsection.
From (1) it is clear that the process X̃ is Harris recurrent with an irreducibility measure ν.
(Recall that the process X̃ is ν-irreducible if for each set Γ ∈ B(E) satisfying ν(Γ) > 0, it holds
that Px (τΓ < ∞) > 0 for each x ∈ E, where
τΓ := inf{t = 1, 2, · · · : X̃t ∈ Γ}.
(2)
As usual, inf ∅ := ∞.) If a Harris recurrent process admits an invariant probability, then it is
called positive Harris recurrent; in that case the invariant probability is unique. We verify that X̃
is positive Harris recurrent with the unique invariant probability q given in the next statement.
Proposition 2.1 The process X̃ is positive Harris recurrent with the unique invariant probability
measure q(dy) given by
q(Γ) =
Z X
∞
p(1 − p)t P t (y, Γ)ν(dy)
(3)
E t=0
for each Γ ∈ B(E).
Proof. Clearly, q(dy) is a probability measure, and routine calculations verify
Z
q(Γ) =
q(dx)P̃ (x, Γ)
E
for each Γ ∈ B(E).
2
We strengthen the above statement in the next corollary. Observe that the process X̃ is
aperiodic in the sense of p.118 of [21], and the state space E is a petite set since P̃ (x, ·) ≥ pν(·)
Inria
5
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
for each x ∈ E. By Theorem 16.0.2 (vi) of [21], we see that the process X̃ is uniformly ergodic
(see also related arguments in [22, 23]). However, in the next statement, we give a direct simple
proof of this fact, and obtain the rate of convergence in terms of the restart probability. Below,
|| · ||T V stands for the total variation norm of finite signed measures.
Corollary 2.1 The process X̃ is uniformly ergodic with the unique invariant probability measure
q(·) given in Proposition 2.1. In particular, we have
||P̃ n (x, ·) − q(·)||T V ≤ 2(1 − p)n .
(4)
Proof. We first note that
P̃ n (x, Γ) =
Z n−1
X
p(1 − p)t P t (y, Γ)ν(dy) + (1 − p)n P n (x, Γ),
E t=0
which can be easily shown by induction. Next, using the above expression and Proposition 2.1,
we can write
Z X
∞
||P̃ n (x, ·) − q(·)||T V = || −
p(1 − p)t P t (y, ·)ν(dy) + (1 − p)n P n (x, ·)||T V
E t=n
≤ (1 − p)n || −
Z X
∞
p(1 − p)t P t+n (y, ·)ν(dy) + P n (x, ·)||T V
E t=0
≤ 2(1 − p)n .
Thus, we have established inequality (4) and hence the uniform ergodicity.
2.2
2
Hitting times
In this paper we are primarily interested in the expected hitting time of the process X̃ to a given
set H ∈ B(E), defined by
ηH := inf{t = 0, 1, · · · : X̃t ∈ H}.
For the future reference, we put
HP
0
(x, E) := I{x ∈ E \ H}.
Denote
V (x) := Ex [ηH ]
(5)
and let
H P (x, Γ)
= P (x, Γ \ H)
be the taboo transition kernel with respect to the set H. Then, one can write
Z
Z
V (x) = 1 + p
V (y)ν(dy) + (1 − p)
V (y)H P (x, dy), ∀ x ∈ E \ H,
E
V (x) = 0,
RR n° 8581
∀ x ∈ H.
E
(6)
6
K. Avrachenkov & A. Piunovskiy & Y. Zhang
Furthermore, it is well known that the function V (x) defined by (5) is the minimal nonnegative
(measurable) solution to equation (6), and can be obtained by iterations
Z
Z
V (n+1) (x) = 1 + p
V (n) (y)ν(dy) + (1 − p)
V (n) (y)H P (x, dy), x ∈ E \ H, n = 0, 1, ...
E
E
with V (x) = 0 if x ∈ H for each n = 0, 1, . . . , and V (0) (x) ≡ 0; c.f. e.g., Proposition 9.10 of
[9].
One can actually obtain the minimal nonnegative solution to (6) in the explicit form.
(n)
Theorem 2.1 (a) The minimal nonnegative solution to (6) is given by the following explicit
form
t
∞ Z
X
V (x) = V1 (x)
p
V1 (y)ν(dy) , ∀ x ∈ E \ H,
E
t=0
(7)
∀ x ∈ H,
V (x) = 0,
where the function V1 is given by
V1 (x) :=
∞
X
(1 − p)t H P t (x, E),
∀ x ∈ E \ H;
t=0
(8)
∀ x ∈ H.
V1 (x) := 0,
It coincides with the unique bounded solution to the equation
Z
V1 (x) = 1 + (1 − p)
V1 (y)H P (x, dy),
∀ x ∈ E \ H;
E
(9)
∀ x ∈ H.
V1 (x) = 0,
(b) If q(H) > 0, then
V (x) =
1−p
R
V1 (x)
< ∞,
V (y)ν(dy)
E 1
∀ x ∈ H.
V (x) = 0,
∀ x ∈ E \ H,
(10)
Proof. (a) Observe that the function V1 given by (8) represents the expected total discounted
time before the first hitting of the process X at the set H given the initial state x and the
discount factor 1 − p. It thus follows from the standard result about the discounted dynamic
programming with a bounded reward that the function V1 is the unique bounded solution to
equation (9); see e.g., Theorem 8.3.6 of [13].
Now by multiplying both sides of the equation (9) by the expression
t
∞ Z
X
p
V1 (y)ν(dy)
t=0
E
for all x ∈ E \ H, it can be directly verified that the function V defined in terms of V1 by (7) is a
nonnegative solution to (6). We show that it is indeed the minimal nonnegative solution to (6)
as follows.
Let U ≥ 0 be an arbitrarily fixed nonnegative solution to (6). It will be shown by induction
that
t
n Z
X
U (x) ≥ V1 (x)
p
V1 (y)ν(dy)
∀ n = 0, 1, . . . , ∀ x ∈ E.
(11)
t=0
E
Inria
7
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
The case when x ∈ H is trivial.
Let x ∈ E \ H be arbitrarily fixed. It follows from (6) that
Z
U (x) ≥ 1 + (1 − p)
H P (x, dy) =
E
Z
1
X
(1 − p)t
t
P
(x,
dy)
≥ 1.
H
(12)
E
t=0
If for some n ≥ 1
Z
n
X
t
U (x) ≥
(1 − p)
H P (x, dy) ,
(13)
t
E
t=0
then by (6),
Z
U (x) ≥ 1 + (1 − p)
U (y)H P (x, dy)
E
n
X
Z
≥ 1 + (1 − p)
E
=
n+1
X
(1 − p)t
(1 − p)
t
Z
!
H P (x, dy)
H P (y, dz)
t
E
t=0
t
H P (x, dy) ,
Z
E
t=0
and so (13) holds for all n ≥ 0 and thus by (8)
U (x) ≥ V1 (x).
Consequently, (11) holds when n = 0.
Suppose (11) holds for n, and consider the case of n + 1. Then from (6),
Z
Z
U (x) = 1 + p
U (y)ν(dy) + (1 − p)
U (y)H P (x, dy)
≥
n+1
X
E
E
Z
t
Z
V1 (y)ν(dy) + (1 − p)
U (y)H P (x, dy),
p
E
t=0
(14)
E
where the inequality follows from the inductive supposition. Define the function W on E by
W (z) = Pn+1
t=0
U (z)
t ,
R
p E V1 (y)ν(dy)
∀ z ∈ E.
Then by (14),
Z
W (x) ≥ 1 + (1 − p)
H P (x, dy) =
E
1
X
(1 − p)t
t=0
Z
t
P
(x,
dy)
;
H
E
c.f. (12). Now, based on (14), a similar reasoning by induction as to the verification of (13) for
all n ≥ 0 shows that
W (x) ≥
Z
k
X
(1 − p)t
t=0
RR n° 8581
E
HP
t
(x, dy) ,
∀ k = 0, 1, . . . ,
8
K. Avrachenkov & A. Piunovskiy & Y. Zhang
and thus W (x) ≥ V1 (x). This means
U (x) ≥ V1 (x)
n+1
X
t
V1 (y)ν(dy) .
Z
p
t=0
E
Thus by induction, (11) holds for all n ≥ 0, and thus
U (x) ≥ V (x)
by (7), as desired.
R
(b) If q(H) > 0, then there exists some T ≥ 0 such that E P T (y, H)ν(dy) > 0, meaning that
R
0
there exists some T 0 ≤ T such that E H P T (x, E)ν(dx) < 1. Thus,
0≤p
Z X
∞
(1 − p)t H P t (y, E)ν(dy) < 1,
E t=0
and so the geometric series
P∞
t=0
R
p
E
t
V1 (y)ν(dy) converges. The statement follows.
2
The next corollary is immediate.
Corollary 2.2 If q(H) > 0, then both V1 (x) and V (x) are bounded with respect to the state
x ∈ E. In particular, we have
V1 (x) ≤
1
.
p
There is a nice probabilistic interpretation of the decomposition presented in Theorem 2.1.
Suppose q(H) > 0, which is case (b) in Theorem 2.1. Let us make a change of variable
ρ(x) = 1 − pV1 (x) = 1 − p
∞
X
(1 − p)t H P t (x, E) = Px [hit before restart].
t=0
Then, equation (10) takes the form
V (x) =
1 − ρ(x)
Px [no hit before restart]
=
.
pPν [hit before restart]
p E ρ(y)ν(dy)
R
The expected number of steps in a cycle from one restart to another is 1/p, and the expected
number of cycles until we hit the set H is roughly 1/Pν [hit before restart]. Thus, the total expected steps is approximately equal to 1/(pPν [hit before restart]). This is only an approximation
since we did not carefully take into account the impact of the first and the last incomplete cycles.
It turns out that the factor Px [no hit before restart] gives the necessary correction. Theorem 2.1
can be viewed as a generalization of the results of [5, 14] to the general state space from the
finite state space.
We also have the following chain of equivalent statements.
Theorem 2.2 The following statements are equivalent.
(a) q(H) > 0.
(b) V (x) = Ex [ηH ] < ∞ for each x ∈ E.
(c) V (x) = Ex [ηH ] < ∞ for almost all x ∈ E with respect to q(dy).
(d) supx∈E V (x) = supx∈E Ex [ηH ] < ∞.
Inria
9
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
The proof of this theorem follows from the next lemma.
Lemma 2.1 Statements (a) and (c) in Theorem 2.2 are equivalent.
Proof. Statement (a) implies statement (c) by Theorem 2.1(b). It remains to show that statement
(c) implies statement (a). To this end, suppose for contradiction that statement (a) does not
hold, i.e., q(H) = 0. Then it follows from (3) that
Z X
∞
P t (y, H)ν(dy) = 0.
E t=0
Thus, there exists a measurable subset Γ of E \ H such that
ν(Γ) = 1
(15)
X
Px [ηH
= ∞] = 1 ∀ x ∈ Γ,
(16)
X
ηH
:= inf{t = 0, 1, · · · : Xt ∈ H}.
(17)
and
where
Let x ∈ Γ be fixed. Then by (8) and (16)
X
ηH
−1
V1 (x) = Ex
X
(1 − p)t = Ex
t=0
"∞
X
t=0
#
(1 − p)t =
1
.
p
Since x ∈ Γ is arbitrarily fixed, and ν(Γ) = 1 by (15), we see from (7) and the fact that V1 (y) ≥ 1
if y ∈ E \ H that V (y) = ∞ for each y ∈ E \ H. Since q(E \ H) = 1, we see that statement (c)
does not hold.
2
Proof of Theorem 2.2. From Theorem 2.1(b), we see that (a) implies (b), which implies (c).
From Lemma 2.1, (c) implies (a). Clearly, (d) implies (b). Finally, (a) implies (d) because V1 (x)
is bounded; see Corollary 2.2.
2
Remark 2.1 Corollary 2.1 and Theorem 16.0.2 of [21] immediately give the relation (a) ⇒
(d) ⇒ (b) ⇒ (c) in Theorem 2.2. However, we gave its self-contained proof in the above without
referring to the result concerning the general Markov chains in [21].
2.3
Optimization problem
Next let us consider the dependance of V (x) on the restart probability p for each fixed x ∈ E.
When we emphasize the dependance on p, we explicitly write V (x, p) and V1 (x, p). In the above,
p ∈ (0, 1) was fixed. Now we formally put
V (x, 0) :=
∞
X
HP
t
(x, E) ∈ [1, ∞], ∀ x ∈ E \ H;
t=0
V (x, 0) := 0, ∀ x ∈ H,
RR n° 8581
10
K. Avrachenkov & A. Piunovskiy & Y. Zhang
which represents the expected hitting time of the process without restart, and
1
∈ [1, ∞], ∀ x ∈ E \ H;
ν(H)
V (x, 1) := 0, ∀ x ∈ H,
V (x, 1) :=
which represents the expected hitting time of the process that restarts with full probability at
each transition. Here and below, 0c := ∞ for any c > 0. As usual, the continuity of V (x, p) at
p = a means limp→a V (x, p) = V (x, a) ∈ [−∞, ∞].
Theorem 2.3 Suppose
Z X
∞
P t (y, H)ν(dy) > 0.
(18)
E t=0
Then the function V (x, p) is infinitely many times differentiable in p ∈ (0, 1) and is continuous
in p ∈ [0, 1]. As a consequence, the problem
Miniminize V (x, p) with respect to p ∈ [0, 1]
(19)
is solvable.
Remark 2.2 The condition (18) in the above statement is equivalent to q(H) > 0 for some and
then all p ∈ (0, 1) by (3).
Proof of Theorem 2.3. If x ∈ H, the statement holds trivially since V (x, p) = R0 for each p ∈ [0, 1].
Consider now x ∈ E \H. One can see that V1 (x, p) (as given by (8)) and (1−p E V1 (y, p)ν(dy))−1
are both infinitely many times differentiable in p ∈ (0, 1). It follows from this and (10) that V (x, p)
is infinitely many times differentiable in p ∈ (0, 1). For the the continuity of V (x, p) at p = 0, it
holds that
X
Z
Z
ηH −1
X
1−p
V1 (y, p)ν(dy) = 1 − p
Ey
(1 − p)t ν(dy)
E
Z
=1−
E
t=0
Z
h
i
h
i
X
X
Ey 1 − (1 − p)ηH ν(dy) =
Ey (1 − p)ηH ν(dy) → 1,
E
E
X
as p → 0, by the monotone convergence theorem; recall (17) for the definition of ηH
. It follows
from this fact, (8), (10) and the monotone convergence theorem that
lim V (x, p)
p→0
=
lim
V (x, p)
p→0R 1
= V (x, 0)
limp→0 1 − p E V1 (y, p)ν(dy)
as desired. The continuity of the function V (x, p) at p = 1 can be similarly established. The last
assertion is a well known fact; see e.g., [9].
2
We shall illustrate the optimization problem (19) by two examples in the next section.
Inria
11
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
3
Numerical examples and application
3.1
Uni-directional random walk on the line
Let E = R, H = [a, b] with a < b being two real numbers. The process X only moves to the
right, and the increments of each of the transitions are i.i.d. exponential random variables with
the common mean µ1 > 0. The restart probability is denoted as p ∈ (0, 1) as usual, and the
restart distribution ν is arbitrary. Below by using Theorem 2.1 we provide the explicit formula
for the expected hitting time at H of the restarted process X̃. (Clearly, if the initial state is
outside H, then the expected hitting time of the process X at the set H is infinite.)
We can give the following informal description of this example. There is a treasure hidden in
the interval [a, b] and one tries to find the treasure. Once the searcher checks one point in the
interval [a, b], he finds the treasure. The searcher has the means only to stop and to check points
between the exponentially distributed steps. This models the cost of checking frequently. It is
also natural to restart the search from some base. Intuitively, by restarting too frequently, the
searcher spends most of the time near the base and does not explore the area sufficiently. On
the other hand, restarting too seldom leads the search to very far locations where the searcher
spends most of the time for nothing. Hence, intuitively there should be an optimal value for
restarting probability.
One can verify that in this example the unique bounded solution to (9) is given by V1 (x) = 0
for each x ∈ [a, b],
1
p
(20)
1 1−p
−
1 − e−µ(b−a) e−µ(a−x)p
p
p
(21)
V1 (x) =
for each x > b,
V1 (x) =
for each x < a. In fact, this can be conveniently established using the following probabilistic
argument. Recall that V1 (x) represents the expected total discounted time up to the hitting of
the set H by the process X; see (8). So for (20) one merely notes that with the initial state
X
X
is defined by (17). For (21), one can write for each x < a that
= ∞, where ηH
x > b, ηH
X
X
ηH −1
ηH −1
X
X
X
V1 (x) = Ex
(1 − p)t = Ex Ex
(1 − p)t ηH
.
t=0
t=0
Now the expected hitting time of the restarted process X̃ to the set H = [a, b] is given by
X
t
∞ Z
1 1−p
V (x) =
−
1 − e−µ(b−a) e−µ(a−x)p
p
V1 (y)ν(dy) ,
p
p
E
t=0
with the initial state x < a, and by
t
∞ Z
1X
V (x) =
p
V1 (y)ν(dy) ,
p t=0
E
with the initial state x > b, recall (7). If the restart distribution ν is not concentrated on (b, ∞),
then q(H) > 0, and by Theorem 2.1(b) we have
1−p
1
1 − e−µ(b−a) e−µ(a−x)p
p − p
R
,
V (x) =
1 − p E V1 (y)ν(dy)
RR n° 8581
12
K. Avrachenkov & A. Piunovskiy & Y. Zhang
with the initial state x < a and by
V (x) =
1
,
p 1 − p E V1 (y)ν(dy)
R
for each x > b. In particular, if the process restarts from a single point r < a, the above
expressions can be specified to
V (x) =
1 − (1 − p)(1 − e−µ(b−a) )e−µ(a−x)p
,
p(1 − p)(1 − e−µ(b−a) )e−µ(a−r)p
for the initial state x < a and to
1
1
V (x) =
,
1 − e−µ(b−a)
p(1 − p)e−µ(a−r)p
for each x > b. For the latter case (x > b), by standard analysis of derivatives, one can find the
optimal value of the restart probability minimizing the expected hitting time of the process with
restart in a closed form, as given by
popt =
2 + µ(a − r) +
2
p
4 + µ2 (a − r)2
.
Now we can make several observations: the first somewhat interesting observation is that in the
case when the initial state is to the right of the interval [a, b], the value of the optimal restart
probability does not depend on the length of the interval but only on the average step size and
on the restart position. The second observation is that when µ(a − r) is small, i.e., when either
the average step size is large or the restart position is close to H, the optimal restart probability
is close to 1/2. Thirdly, when µ(a − r) is large, the optimal restart probability is small and reads
1
1
popt =
+o
.
1 + µ(a − r)
µ(a − r)
3.2
Random walk on the one dimensional lattice
Let us consider a symmetric random walk on the one dimensional lattice which aims to hit
H = {0} with restart at some node r. Assume without loss of generality that the restart state r
is on the positive half-line, i.e., r > 0.
From Theorem 2.1 we conclude that it is sufficient to solve the following equations
V1 (k) = 1 +
1−p
[V1 (k − 1) + V1 (k + 1)],
2
k 6= 0,
V1 (0) = 0.
Following the standard approach for solution of difference equations, we obtain
1
V1 (k) = cα1k + ,
p
where α1 < 1 is the minimal solution to the characteristic equation
α=
1−p
[1 + α2 ],
2
Inria
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
13
and the constant c = − p1 comes from the condition V1 (0) = 0. Consequently,
V (k) =
V1 (k)
1 − α1k
.
=
1 − pV1 (r)
pα1r
An elegant analysis can be done for the limiting case when the initial position k goes large, and
hence we now minimize limk→∞ V (k) = 1/(pα1r ), or equivalently, maximize pα1r with respect to
p ∈ (0, 1). This leads to the following equation for the optimal restart probability
p dα1
1
=− .
α1 dp
r
(22)
Indeed, we note that
p dα1
p dα1
= 0, lim
= −∞,
p→1 α1 dp
p→0 α1 dp
lim
and
d
dp
p dα1
α1 dp
1 − (1 − p2 )(1 − p)
1
< 0.
= −p
1 − (1 − p)2 (1 − p)2 (1 − (1 − p)2 )
Thus, the left hand side of (22) is a monotone function decreasing from zero to minus infinity.
Consequently, the unique solution of equation (22) is the global minimizer of 1/(pα1r ). The
equation (22) can be transformed to the polynomial equation
1
(1 − p)2 (2 − p) = p
r2
Consider the case of large r. This is a so-called case of singular perturbation, as the small
parameter 1/r2 is in front of the largest degree term, [4], [8]. It is not difficult to see that for
large values of r, the equation has one real root that can be expanded as
popt =
c1
c2
+ 4 + ...
r2
r
(23)
and two complex roots that move to infinity as r → ∞. By substituting the series (23) into the
polynomial equation, we can identify the terms ci , i = 1, 2, .... Thus, we obtain
popt =
3.3
2
10
− 4 + o(r−4 ).
2
r
r
Application to network centrality
One of the main tasks in network analysis is to determine which nodes are more “central” than
the others. Node degree and PageRank [10] are examples of widely used centrality measures.
We note that PageRank is a stationary distribution of the random walk with restart and in
our setting it is just measure q. Both node degree and PageRank are prone to manipulation or
so-called “sybil attack”. To mitigate this problem, the authors of [14, 18] proposed hitting time
based centrality measures. Here we show that the hitting time based centrality can be more
discerning. Let us first consider a simple 6-node network with weighted edges, see Figure 1. The
weights are depicted near the edges.
In Table 1 we give centrality values of the nodes with respect to node degree, PageRank and
Expected Hitting Times starting and restarting both from the uniform distribution.
RR n° 8581
14
K. Avrachenkov & A. Piunovskiy & Y. Zhang
Figure 1: Example of 6-node network with weighted edges.
Nodes
Node degree
PageRank, ∀p
Hitting time, p = 0.15
Table 1: Centralities for 6-node network.
A
B
C
D
E
F
3
3
3
3
3
3
1/6 1/6 1/6 1/6 1/6 1/6
6.28 8.28 8.28 6.28 8.28 8.28
The last row in Table 1 lists down the expected hitting times to the target state A, B, and so
on. It is intuitively clear that nodes A and D are more central in this network. However, both
node degree and PageRank indicate equal importance for the nodes. In contrast, the hitting time
based centrality clearly indicates that nodes A and D are more central than the other nodes.
Let us now consider an example of a real social network. The example was taken from online
social network VKontakte and represents a principal component of the interest group about
Game Theory [6]. The example has 71 nodes and 116 weighted edges, see Figure 2 (taken from
[6]). The edge weight is equal to the number of common friends. Only the edges with a weight
more than two have been kept.
Figure 2: Example of a social network.
In Table 2 we provide top-10 lists of nodes according to node degree, PageRank and the
expected hitting time.
Inria
15
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
Table 2: Top-10
Node degree
1 8 4
PageRank, p = 0.15
1 8 56
Hitting time, p = 0.15 1 8 56
lists for the social network example.
20 6 56 7 28 44 32
28 44 4 32 20 63 6
28 63 22 13 33 69 4
We observe that the top-10 list by PageRank has 9 nodes from the top-10 list by node degree.
The top-10 list by the expected hitting time has only 5 nodes from the top-10 list by node degree.
Note that nodes 22 and 13, which intuitively look quite central, are not in the top-10 list by
PageRank.
Finally, we would like to show in Figure 3 the expected hitting time from node A to node B
in the 6-node example as a function of the restart probability p. This function has a minimum
inside the interval [0, 1]. We think it will be interesting to study the minimization of the expected
hitting time in the context of network community analysis.
8
7.5
hAB(p)
7
6.5
6
5.5
5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
p
Figure 3: The expected hitting time from A to B.
4
Conclusion
In conclusion, in this paper we present a self-contained study of a discrete-time Markov process
with restart. Our primary interest is in the expected hitting time of the process with restart to
a target set. We obtained the formula of the expected hitting time of the restarted process to
a target set, and considered the optimization problem of the expected hitting time with respect
to the restart probability. We illustrated our results with two examples in uncountable and
countable state spaces and one application to network centrality. In particular, we show that the
network centrality based on hitting times is more selective. Our general results may also have
potential application to network community analysis, which we intend to explore in the future.
RR n° 8581
16
K. Avrachenkov & A. Piunovskiy & Y. Zhang
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the European Commission within the framework of the
CONGAS project FP7-ICT-2011-8-317672. Y.Zhang’s work was carried out with a financial
grant from the Research Fund for Coal and Steel of the European Commission, within the
INDUSE-2-SAFETY project (Grant No. RFSR-CT-2014-00025).
References
[1] Alt H., Guibas L., Mehlhorn K., Karp R. and Wigderson A., A method for obtaining randomized algorithms with small tail probabilities. Algorithmica. 16, 543-547, (1996).
[2] Asmussen S., Fiorini P., Lipsky L., Rolski T. and Sheahan R., Asymptotic behavior of total
times for jobs that must start over if a failure occurs. Mathematics of Operations Research.
33(4), 932-944, (2008).
[3] Asmussen S., Lipsky L. and Thompson S., Checkpointing in failure recovery in computing
and data transmission, In Proceedings of ASMTA’14, also in LNCS v.8499, 253-272, Springer,
(2014).
[4] Avrachenkov K., Filar J.A. and Howlett P.G., Analytic perturbation theory and its applications, SIAM, (2013).
[5] Avrachenkov K. and Litvak N., The effect of new links on Google PageRank. Stochastic
Models, 22(2), 319-331, (2006).
[6] Avrachenkov K., Mazalov V. and Tsynguev B., Beta current flow centrality for weighted
networks. In Proceedings of CSoNet 2015, also in Springer LNCS v.9197, 216-227, (2015).
[7] Avrachenkov K., Piunovskiy A. and Zhang Y., Markov processes with restart. Journal of
Applied Probability, 50, 960-968, (2013).
[8] Baumgärtel H., Analytic perturbation theory for matrices and operators, Birkhäuser, Basel,
(1985).
[9] Bertsekas D. and Shreve S., Stochastic optimal control: the discrete-time case. Academic
Press, New York, (1978).
[10] Brin S. and Page L., The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer
Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 107-117, (1998).
[11] Dumitriu I., Tetali P. and Winkler P., On playing golf with two balls. SIAM Journal on
Discrete Mathematics. 16(4), 604-615, (2003).
[12] González M.C., Hidalgo C.A. and Barabási A.-L., Understanding individual human mobility
patterns. Nature, 453, 779-782, (2008).
[13] Hernández-Lerma O. and Lasserre J.-B., Further topics in discrete-time Markov control
processes. Springer, New York, (1999).
[14] Hopcroft J. and Sheldon D., Manipulation-resistant reputations using hitting time. Internet
Mathematics, 5(1-2), 71-90, (2008).
Inria
Hitting Times in Markov Chains with Restart
17
[15] Janson S. and Peres Y., Hitting times for random walks with restarts. SIAM Journal on
Discrete Mathematics. 26(2), 537-547, (2012).
[16] Krishnamurthy B. and Rexford J., Web protocols and practice: HTTP/1.1, networking
protocols, caching, and traffic measurement. Addison Wesley, (2001).
[17] Kulkarni V., Nicola V. and Trivedi K., The completion time of a job on a multimode system.
Advances in Applied Probability. 19, 932-954, (1987).
[18] Liu B.K., Parkes D.C. and Seuken S., Personalized hitting time for informative trust mechanisms despite sybils. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous
Agents & Multiagent Systems, pp. 1124-1132, (2016).
[19] Luby M., Sinclair A. and Zuckerman D., Optimal speedup of Las Vegas algorithms. Information Processing Letters. 47, 173-180, (1993).
[20] Maurer S.M. and Huberman B.A., Restart strategies and Internet congestion. Journal of
Economic Dynamics and Control. 25, 641-654, (2001).
[21] Meyn S. and Tweedie R., Markov chains and stochastic stability. Springer, London, (1993).
[22] Nummelin E., MC’s for MCMC’ists. International Statistical Review. 70(2), 215-240, (2002).
[23] Nummelin, E. and Tuominen, P., Geometric ergodicity of Harris recurrent Marcov chains
with applications to renewal theory. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications. 12(2),
pp.187-202, (1982).
[24] Walsh P.D., Boyer D. and Crofoot M.C., Monkey and cell-phone-user mobilities scale similarly. Nature Physics. 6, 929-930, (2010).
Contents
1 Introduction
3
2 Main statements
2.1 Known facts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Hitting times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Optimization problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
4
5
9
3 Numerical examples and application
3.1 Uni-directional random walk on the line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Random walk on the one dimensional lattice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 Application to network centrality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11
11
12
13
4 Conclusion
15
RR n° 8581
RESEARCH CENTRE
SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS – MÉDITERRANÉE
2004 route des Lucioles - BP 93
06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
Publisher
Inria
Domaine de Voluceau - Rocquencourt
BP 105 - 78153 Le Chesnay Cedex
inria.fr
ISSN 0249-6399
| 3cs.SY
|
Single-sink Fractionally Subadditive Network Design
Guru Guruganesh
∗1
, Jennifer Iglesias
† 1
, R. Ravi
‡1
, and Laura Sanità2
1
arXiv:1707.01487v2 [cs.DS] 11 Jul 2017
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA , {ggurugan, jiglesia,
ravi}@andrew.cmu.edu
2
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada , [email protected]
July 12, 2017
Abstract
We study a generalization of the Steiner tree problem, where we are given a weighted network
G together with a collection of k subsets of its vertices and a root r. We wish to construct a
minimum cost network such that the network supports one unit of flow to the root from every
node in a subset simultaneously. The network constructed does not need to support flows from
all the subsets simultaneously.
We settle an open question regarding the complexity of this problem for k = 2, and give a
3
2 -approximation algorithm that improves over a (trivial) known 2-approximation. Furthermore,
we prove some structural results that prevent many well-known techniques from doing better than
the known O(log n)-approximation. Despite these obstacles, we conjecture that this problem
should have an O(1)-approximation. We also give an approximation result for a variant of the
problem where the solution is required to be a path.
Subject Class: F.2.2 Nonnumerical Algorithms and Problems, G2.2 Graph Theory
Keywords: Network design, single-commodity flow, approximation algorithms, Steiner tree.
1
Introduction
We study a robust version of a single-sink network design problem that we call the Single-sink
fractionally-subadditive network design (f-SAND) problem. In an instance of f-SAND, we are given
an undirected graph G = (V, E) with edge costs we ≥ 0 for all e ∈ E, a root node r ∈ V , and k
colors represented as vertex subsets Ci ⊆ V \ {r} for all i ∈ [k], that wish to send flow to r. A
feasible solution is an integer capacity installation on the edges of G, such that for every i ∈ [k],
each node in Ci can simultaneously send one unit of flow to r. Thus, the total flow sent by color
i nodes is is |Ci | while the flows sent from nodes of different colors are instead non-simultaneous
and can share capacity. An optimal solution is a feasible one that minimizes the total cost of the
installation.
∗
This material is based upon work supported in part by National Science Foundation awards CCF-1319811,CCF1536002, and CCF-1617790
†
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
Program under Grant No. 2013170941
‡
This material is based upon research supported in part by the U. S. Office of Naval Research under award number
N00014-12-1-1001, and the U. S. National Science Foundation under award number CCF-1527032.
1
The single-sink nature of the problem suggests a natural cut-covering formulation, namely:
X
min
we xe s.t.
e∈E
X
xe ≥ f (S)
∀S ⊂ V \ {r}
(IP)
e∈δ(S)
x ≥ 0,
x ∈ Z,
where δ(S) denotes the set of edges with exactly one endpoint in S, and
f (S) := max{|Ci ∩ S|}
(1)
i∈[k]
for all S ⊆ V \ {r}. Despite having exponentially many constraints, the LP-relaxation of (IP) can
be solved in polynomial-time because the separation problem reduces to performing k max-flow
computations. The main challenge is to round the resulting solution into an integer solution.
Rounding algorithms for the LP relaxation of (IP) have been investigated by many authors, under
certain assumptions of the function f (S). Prominent examples are some classes of 0/1-functions
(such as uncrossable functions), or integer-valued functions such as proper functions, or weakly
supermodular functions [12, 19]; however, these papers consider arbitrary cut requirements rather
than the single-sink connectivity requirements we study.
Our single-sink problem is a special case of a broader class of subadditive network design problems
where the function f is allowed to be a general subadditive function. Despite their generality, the
single-sink network design problem for general subadditive functions can be approximated within
an O(log |V |) factor by using a tree drawn from the probabilistic tree decomposition of the metric
induced by G using the results of Fakcharoenphol, Rao, and Talwar [8], and installing the required
capacity on the tree edges. Hence, a natural direction is to consider special cases of such subadditive
cut requirement functions.
Our function f (S) defined in (1) is an interesting and important special case of subadditive
functions. It was introduced as XOS-functions (max-of-sum functions) in the context of combinatorial
auctions by Lehman et al. [21]. Feige [9] proved that this function is equivalent to fractionallysubadditive functions which are a strict generalization of submodular functions (hence the title).
These functions have been extensively studied in the context of learning theory and algorithmic
game theory [1, 3, 21]. Our work is an attempt to understand their behavior as single-sink network
design requirement functions.
f-SAND was first studied by Oriolo et al. [22] in the context of robust network design, where
the goal is to install minimum cost capacity on a network in order to satisfy a given set of (nonsimultaneous) traffic demands among terminal nodes. Each subset Ci can in fact be seen as a way
to specify a distinct traffic demand that the network would like to support. They observed that
f-SAND generalizes the Steiner tree problem: an instance of the Steiner tree problem with k + 1
terminals t1 , . . . , tk+1 is equivalent to the f-SAND instance with r := tk+1 and Ci := {ti } for all
i ∈ [k]. This immediately shows that f-SAND is NP-hard (in fact, APX-hard [6]) when k is part of
the input. The authors in [22] strengthened the hardness result by proving that f-SAND is NP-hard
even if k is not part of the input, and in particular for k = 3 (if k = 1 the problem is trivially
solvable in polynomial-time by computing a shortest path tree rooted at r). From the positive
side, they observed that there is a trivial k-approximation algorithm, that relies on routing via
shortest paths, and an O(log | ∪i Ci |)-approximation algorithm using metric embeddings [8, 17].
The authors conclude their paper mentioning two open questions, namely whether the problem is
polynomial-time solvable for k = 2, and whether there exists an O(1)-approximation algorithm.
2
1.1
Our results
1. In this paper, we answer the first open question in [22] by showing that f-SAND is NP-hard
for k = 2 via a reduction from SAT.
2. We give a 32 -approximation algorithm for this case (k = 2). This is the first improvement over
the (trivial) k-approximation obtained using shortest paths for any k. Our approximation
algorithm is based on pairing terminals of different groups together, and therefore reducing to
a suitable minimum cost matching problem. While the idea behind the algorithm is natural,
its analysis requires a deeper understanding of the structure of the optimal solution.
3. We also introduce an interesting variant of f-SAND, which we call the Latency-f-SAND problem,
where the network built is restricted to being a path with the root r being one of the endpoints
(f-SAND-path). We show a O(log2 k log n)-approximation using a new reformulation of the
problem that allows us to exploit techniques recently developed for latency problems [4].
4. While being a generalization of well-studied problems, f-SAND does not seem to admit an
easy O(1)-approximation via standard LP-rounding techniques for arbitrary values of k. We
prove some structural results that highlight the difficulty of the general problem (see Appendix
A). In particular, we show a family of a instances providing a super-constant gap between
an optimal f-SAND solution and an optimal tree-solution, i.e., a solution whose support is
a tree – this rules out many methods that output a solution with a tree structure. The
bulk of the construction was shown in [13] and we amend it to our problem using a simple
observation. Furthermore, we give some evidence that an iterative rounding approach (as
in Jain’s fundamental work [19]) is unlikely to work. This follows by considering a special
class of Kneser Graphs, where the LP seems to put low fractional weight on each edge in an
extreme point.
5. Open Questions. We offer the following conjecture as our main open question.
1
Conjecture 1 There exists an O(1)-approximation algorithm for the f-SAND problem.
Although standard LP-based approaches seem to fail in providing a constant factor approximation, the worst known integrality gap example we are aware of yields a (trivial) lower
bound of 2 on the integrality gap of (IP) for f-SAND. A related open question is if there is an
instance of f-SAND for which the integrality gap of (IP) is greater than 2.
1.2
Related work.
Network design problems where the goal is to build a minimum cost network in order to support a
given set of flow demands, have been extensively studied in the literature (we refer to the survey
[5]). There has been a huge amount of research focusing on the case the set of demands is described
via a polyhedron (see e.g. [2]). In this context a very popular model is the Virtual private network
[7, 11], for which many approximation results have been developed (see e.g. [14, 15, 16] and the
references therein). For the case where the set of demands is instead given as a (finite) discrete
list, the authors in [22] developed a constant factor approximation algorithm on ring networks, and
proved that f-SAND is polynomial-time solvable on ring networks.
1
Although the problem is known in some circles, it has not been explicitly stated as a conjecture. We do so here,
in the hopes that it will encourage others to work on this problem.
3
Regarding the formulation (IP), Goemans and Williamson [12] gave a O(log(fmax ))-approximation
algorithm for solving (IP) whenever f (S) is an integer-valued proper function that can take values
up to fmax , based on a primal-dual approach. Subsequently, Jain [19] improved this result by
giving a 2-approximation algorithm using iterative rounding of the LP-relaxation. Recently, a
strongly-polynomial time FPTAS to solve the LP-relaxation of (IP) with proper functions has been
given in [10].
2
3/2-approximation for the two color case
The goal of this section is to give a 32 -approximation algorithm for SAND with two colors. We
remark that our algorithm bypasses the difficulties mentioned in the previous section. In particular,
the final output is not a tree.
2.1
Simplifying Assumptions.
We will refer to the two colors as green and blue, and let CG ⊂ V denote the set of green terminals,
and CB ⊂ V denote the set of blue terminals. Without loss of generality, we will assume that
|CG | = |CB |, i.e., the cardinality of green terminals is equal to the cardinality of blue terminals (if
not, we could easily add dummy nodes at distance 0 from the root). Furthermore, by replacing each
edge in the original graph with |CG | parallel edges of the same cost, we can assume that in a feasible
solution the capacity installed on each edge must be either 0 or 1. This means that each edge is
used by at most one terminal of CG (resp. CB ) to carry flow to the root. Lastly, we assume that
every terminal in CG shares at least one edge with some terminal in CB in the optimal solution.2
Let OPT denote an optimal solution to a given instance of SAND with two colors. We start by
developing some results on the structure of OPT, that will be crucial to analyze our approximation
algorithm later.
2.2
Understanding the structure of OPT
A feasible solution of a SAND instance consists of a (integer valued) capacity installation on the
edges that allows for a flow from the terminals to the root. Given a feasible solution, each terminal
will send its unit of flow to t on a single path. Let us call the collection of such paths a routing
associated with the feasible solution. The first important concept we need is the concept of splits.
2.2.1
Shared Edges and Splits.
Given a routing, for each terminal g ∈ CG (and b ∈ CB respectively) let Pg (Pb ) denote the path
along which g (b) sends flow to the root; i.e. Pg := {g = x0 , x1 , . . . , x|Pg | = r}. We say that an edge
e is shared if the paths of two terminals of different color contain the edge. We say that g ∈ CG
and b ∈ CB are partners with respect to a shared edge e = uv, if their respective paths use the
edge e; i.e. e ∈ Pg ∩ Pb .
Definition 2.1 A split in the path Pg is a maximal set of consecutive edges of the path such that g is
partnered with some b on all the edges of this set.
We can easily ensure this e.g. by modifying our instance as follows: we add a dummy node r0 which is only
connected to r with |CG | parallel edges of 0 cost, and we make r0 be the new root. In this way, all terminals will use
one copy of the edge (r, r0 ).
2
4
If {(xi , xi+1 ), (xi+1 , xi+2 ), . . . , (xi+j−1 , xi+j )} is a split in the path Pg = {g = x0 , x1 , . . . , x|Pg | =
r} for g ∈ CG , then there exists a unique terminal b ∈ CB such that Pb contains the edges
{(xi , xi+1 ), (xi+1 , xi+2 ), . . . , (xi+j−1 , xi+j )}, Pb does not contain the edge (xi−1 , xi ), and if xi+j 6= r
then Pb does not contain the edge (xi+j , xi+j+1 ). By our assumptions, the terminal b is unique as
each edge is used by at most one terminal of each color.
Since the flow is going from a terminal g to r, the path Pg naturally induces an orientation on
its edges given by the direction of the flow, even though the edges are undirected. Of course, the
paths of different terminals could potentially induce opposite orientations on (some of) the shared
edges (see Figure 1).
Definition 2.2 A split is wide, if the paths of the two terminals that are partners on the edges of the
split induce opposite orientations on the edges. A split is thin, if the paths of the two terminals that are
partners on the edges of the split induce the same orientation on the edges.
The above notions are well defined for any routing with respect to a feasible solution. Now, we
focus on the structure of an optimal routing, i.e., a routing with respect to an optimal solution. For
the rest of this section, we let {Pg }g∈CG and {Pb }b∈CB be an optimal routing. The following lemma
is immediate.
Lemma 2.3 Let {(xi , xi+1 ), (xi+1 , xi+2 ), . . . , (xi+j−1 , xi+j )} be a split in the path Pg (for some
g ∈ CG ). The edges of the split form a shortest path from xi to xi+j .
Proof. If not, we could replace this set of edges with the set of edges of a shortest path from xi
to xi+j , in both Pg and Pb , where b is the partner of g on the split. Therefore, we can install one
unit of capacity on these edges, and remove the unit of capacity from the edges of the split. We get
another feasible solution with smaller cost, a contradiction to the optimality of our initial solution.
2
2.2.2
Split Graph.
A consequence of Lemma 2.3 is each split is entirely characterized by the endpoints of the split and
the terminals that share them. We denote each split by a tuple (u, v, g, b) which states that there is
a shortest path between u and v whose edges are shared by g and b.
Let S denote the set of all splits in the optimal routing. We construct a directed graph GS
whose vertex set corresponds to V = S ∪ CG ∪ CB (i.e. the vertex set contains one vertex for
each split and one vertex for each terminal). For each g ∈ CG , we place a directed green edge
going between two consecutive splits in Pg . Specifically, if {(xi , xi+1 ), . . . , (xi+j−1 , xi+j )} and
{(xi0 , xi0 +1 ), . . . , (xi0 +j 0 −1 , xi0 +j 0 )} are two splits in Pg with i < i0 , we say that they are consecutive if
the subpath from xi+j to xi0 does not contain any split. In this case, we place a directed edge in GS
whose tail is the vertex corresponding to the first split, and whose head is the vertex corresponding
to the second one. Similarly, for each b ∈ CB we place a directed blue edge between vertices of
consecutive splits that appear in Pb . Furthermore, for each g ∈ CG (resp. b ∈ CB ) we place a
directed green (resp. blue) edge from g (resp. b) to the vertex corresponding to the first split on the
path Pg (resp. Pb ), if any. This graph is denoted as the Split Graph (see Figure 1).
Each split indicates that two terminals of different colors are sharing the capacity on a set of
edges in an optimal routing. Hence, each split-vertex in GS has indegree 2 (in particular, one edge of
each color). Furthermore, each split-vertex in GS has outdegree either 0 or 2; if it has two outgoing
edges, one is green and one is blue. Similarly, each terminal has indegree 0, and outdegree 1 (as we
assume that each terminal shares at least one edge).
5
r
g1 − b2
g2 − b1
g1 − b1
b2
g2
g2
b2
b1
g1
b1
g1
Figure 1: The above left graph (where each undirected edge is supposed to have unit capacity)
shows an optimal routing for some f-SAND instance. Note that b1 and g2 (resp. b2 and g1 ) send
flow to r going counterclockwise (resp. clockwise) on the edges of the cycle. The path Pb1 contains
two splits: the first is wide (b1 is partnered with g1 ), the second is thin (b1 is partnered with g2 ).
The graph on the right is the Split Graph for the optimal solution on the left. The pair of vertices
g1 , b1 and the pair of vertices g2 , b2 constitute the fresh pairs.
2.2.3
Fresh Pairs.
We need one additional definition before proceeding to the algorithm.
Definition 2.4 An S-alternating sequence is a sequence of vertices of the Split Graph {v, s1 , s2 , . . . , sh , w}
with h ≥ 1, that satisfies the following:
(i) (v, s1 ) and (w, sh ) are directed edges in GS and v, w are terminals of different color.
(ii) For all even i ≥ 2, (si , si−1 ) and (si , si+1 ) are both directed edges in GS with opposite colors.
We call the path obtained by taking the edges in (i) and (ii) an S-alternating path. We call (v, w) a
fresh pair if they are the endpoints of an S-alternating path.
By definition, in an S-alternating sequence the vertices s1 , . . . , sh are all split-vertices, and h is odd.
We remark here that an S-alternating path is not a directed path. (See again Figure 1).
Lemma 2.5 We can find a set of edge-disjoint S-alternating paths in the Split Graph such that each
terminal is the endpoint of exactly one path in this set.
Proof. We construct the desired set as follows. For each vertex g ∈ CG , there is a unique
outgoing edge to a split vertex s ∈ S (as we assume every terminal participates in a split). Since
each split-vertex has indegree 2, s has another ingoing edge coming from a different vertex w. If
w ∈ CB , then (v, w) is a fresh pair and we have found an S-alternating sequence {v, s, w}. If w is a
split-vertex, then it has another outgoing edge to a different split-vertex s0 , which in its turn has
another incoming edge from a different vertex w0 . We continue to build an alternating sequence
(and a corresponding alternating path) in this way until it terminates in a terminal. Since the path
is of even length and the colors alternate, we can conclude that this will terminate in a terminal of
opposite color. We remove the edges of this path from the Split Graph, and iterate the process.
Each terminal will belong to exactly one S-alternating path, as it has outdegree exactly 1, and all
the paths are edge-disjoint, proving the lemma.
2
6
2.3
The Algorithm
We are now ready to present our matching algorithm. The algorithm has two steps. First, construct
a complete bipartite graph H with the bipartitions CG and CB , where the weight on the edge
(g, b) ∈ CG × CB is equal to the cost of the Steiner tree in G connecting g, b and the root. Note
that the graph H can be computed in polynomial time, since a Steiner tree on 3 vertices can be
easily computed in polynomial time.
Second, find a minimum-weight perfect matching M in H, and for each edge (g, b) ∈ M install
(cumulatively) one unit of capacity on each edge of G that is in the Steiner tree associated to the
edge (g, b) ∈ M. The capacity installation output by this procedure is a feasible solution to f-SAND,
and has total cost equal to the weight of M.
Lemma 2.6 The matching algorithm is a 32 -approximation algorithm.
Proof. First, we partition OP T into four parts; let wb (and wg respectively) be the cost of the
edges which are used only by blue (green respectively) terminals in OP T , and let wt (wd ) be the
cost of edges in thin (wide) splits in OP T . Thus, w(OP T ) = wb + wg + wt + wd . By Lemma 2.5,
we can extract from the Split Graph associated to OP T a set of S-alternating paths such that each
terminal is contained in exactly one fresh pair. Consider the matching M1 determined by the set of
fresh pairs found by the aforementioned procedure. We will now bound the weight of M1 .
Claim 1 The weight of the matching formed by connecting the fresh pairs is at most
3
3
· wb + · wg + 1 · wt + 3 · wd .
2
2
Proof. Let (g, b) be a fresh pair and (g, s1 , . . . , sh , b) be the corresponding S-alternating sequence.
The edges of the associated S-alternating path naturally correspond to paths in G composed by
non-shared edges (that connect either the endpoints of two different splits, or one terminal and
one endpoint of a split). These paths together with the edges of the wide splits in the sequence,
naturally yield a path P (b, g) in G connecting g and b.
If we do this for all fresh pairs, we obtain that the total cost of the paths P (b, g) is upper
bounded by 1 · wb + 1 · wg + 2 · wd . The reason for having a coefficient of 2 in front of wd is because
the S-alternating paths of Lemma 2.5 are edge-disjoint, but not necessarily vertex-disjoint: however,
since each split-vertex has at most 4 edges incident into it, it can be part of at most 2 S-alternating
paths.
Using the aforementioned connection, we can move all terminals in CG to their partners in CB .
Subsequently, we connect them to the root using the Pb for all b ∈ CB . This connection to the
root will incur a cost of 1 · wb + 1 · wd + 1 · wt . Combining this together, we get a total cost of
2 · wb + 1 · wg + 1 · wt + 3 · wd . Analogously, if we connect the partners in CG to the root using the
the path Pg for all g ∈ CG , we will incur a total cost of 1 · wb + 2 · wg + 1 · wt + 3 · wd . Since the
sum of the cost of the Steiner trees connecting the fresh pairs to the root is no more than either of
these two values, we can bound the weight of M1 by their average:
3
3
· wb + · wg + 1 · wt + 3 · wd .
2
2
2
Claim 2 There exists a matching in H of weight at most 1 · wb + 1 · wg + 2 · wt .
7
Proof. Consider the flow routed on the optimal paths by the set of all terminals CG ∪ CB . We
modify the flow (and the corresponding routing) as follows. Whenever two terminals traverse a
wide-split, re-route the flows so as to not use the wide-split. This is always possible as the two
terminals traverse these edges in opposite directions (by definition of wide splits). This re-routing
ensures that all the edges of wide-splits are not used anymore in the resulting paths. However,
thin-splits which contained terminals of different colors passing in the same direction, might now
contain two terminals of the same color passing through the edges. This means that these edges
will be used twice (or must have twice the capacity installed). All other edges do not need to have
their capacity changed. Thus, the resulting flow can be associated with a feasible solution of cost at
most 1 · wb + 1 · wg + 2 · wt + 0 · wd . This flow corresponds to all vertices directly connecting to the
root as any shared edge is counted twice. Hence, this is a bound on any matching in H.
2
The average weight of the above matchings is an upper-bound on the minimum weight of a matching
in H. Hence, the weight of M is at most
1
1 3
3
·
· wb + · wg + 1 · wt + 3 · wd + · 1 · wb + 1 · wg + 2 · wt + 0 · wd
2 2
2
2
3
≤ · wb + wg + wt + wd )
2
Therefore, the matching algorithm is 32 -approximation algorithm.
3
2
Hardness for two colors
We prove that the SAND problem is NP-hard even with just two colors.
Theorem 3.1 The SAND problem with 2 colors is NP-hard.
Proof. We use a reduction from a variant of the Satisfiability (SAT) problem, where each variable
can appear in at most 3 clauses, that is known to be NP-hard [23]. Formally, in a SAT instance we
are given m clauses K1 , . . . , Km , and p variables x1 , . . . , xp . Each clause Kj is a disjunction of some
literals, where a literal is either a variable xi or its negation x̄i , for some i in 1, . . . , p. The goal
is to find a truth assignment for the variables that satisfies all clauses, where a clause is satisfied
if at least one of its literals takes value true. In the instances under consideration, each variable
xi appears in at most 3 clauses, either as a literal xi , or as a literal x̄i . It is not difficult to see
that, without loss of generality, we can assume that every variable appears in exactly 3 clauses.
Furthermore, by possibly replacing all occurrences of xj with x̄j and vice versa, we can assume that
each variable xi appears in exactly one clause in its negated form (x̄i ).
Given such a SAT instance, we define an instance of SAND as follows (see Fig. 2). We construct
a graph G = (V, E) by introducing one sink node r, one node kj for each clause Kj , and 7 distinct
nodes yi` , (` = 1, . . . , 7), for each variable xi . That is,
( p
)
[
V := {r} ∪ {k1 , . . . , km } ∪
{yi1 , yi2 , yi3 , yi4 , yi5 , yi6 , yi7 }
i=1
The set of edges E is the disjoint union of three different sets, E := E1 ∪ E2 ∪ E3 , where:
( 4
)
( 6
)
p
p
[
[
[
[
E1 :=
{r, yi2`−1 } ; E2 :=
{yi` , yi`+1 } .
i=1
i=1
`=1
8
`=1
Figure 2: The picture shows the subgraph introduced for every variable xi . Bold edges have cost 2,
solid edges have cost 1, and dashed edges have cost M . Black circles indicate nodes in C1 , and grey
circles indicate nodes in C2 . Nodes in C1 ∩ C2 are colored half-black and half-grey.
To define the set E3 , we need to introduce some more notation. For a variable xi , we let i1 and
i2 be the two indices of the clauses containing the literal xi , and we let i3 be the index of the clause
containing the literal x̄i . We then have
E3 :=
p
[
{yi2 , ki1 }, {yi4 , ki3 }, {yi6 , ki2 } .
i=1
We assign cost 2 to the edges in E1 , unit cost to the edges in E2 , and a big cost M >> 0 to the
edges of E3 (in particular, M > 2m + 8p). Finally, we let the color classes3 be defined as:
( p
)
( p
)
[
[
1 5
3 7
C1 := {k1 , . . . , km } ∪
{yi , yi } ; C2 := {k1 , . . . , km } ∪
{yi , yi } .
i=1
i=1
We claim that there exists an optimal solution to the SAND instance of cost at most (M +2)m+8p
if and only if there is a truth assignment satisfying all clauses for the SAT instance.
3.1
Completeness
First, let us assume that the SAT instance is satisfiable. For each clause Kj , we select one literal
that is set to true in the truth
S assignment. We define the paths for our terminal nodes in C1 as
follows. For each node y ∈ pi=1 {yi1 , yi5 }, we let the flow travel from y to r along the edge {y, r}.
For each kj , we let the flow travel to r on a path P1j , that we define based on the literal selected for
Kj . Specifically, let xi be the variable corresponding to the literal selected for the clause Kj . Then:
• if Kj = Ki1 , we let P1j be the path with nodes {kj , yi2 , yi3 , r},
• if Kj = Ki2 , we let P1j be the path with nodes {kj , yi6 , yi7 , r},
• if Kj = Ki3 , we let P1j be the path with nodes {kj , yi4 , yi3 , r}.
S
We define the paths for our terminal nodes in C2 similarly. For each node y ∈ pi=1 {yi3 , yi7 }, we let
the flow travel from y to r along the edge {y, r}. For each kj , we let the flow travel to r on a path
P2j defined as follows. Let xi be the variable corresponding to the literal selected for the clause Kj .
Then:
3
We here have C1 ∩ C2 6= ∅. However, the reduction can be easily modified to prove hardness of instances where
C1 ∩ C2 = ∅, by simply adding for all j two nodes kj1 , kj2 adjacent to kj with an edge of zero cost, and by letting kj1
(resp. kj2 ) be in C1 (resp. C2 ) instead of kj .
9
• if Kj = Ki1 , we let P2j be the path with nodes {kj , yi2 , yi1 , r},
• if Kj = Ki2 , we let P2j be the path with nodes {kj , yi6 , yi5 , r},
• if Kj = Ki3 , we let P2j be the path with nodes {kj , yi4 , yi5 , r}.
Note that the paths of terminals belonging to the same color set do not share edges. In fact, by
construction, the paths of two terminals in C1 could possibly share an edge only if for two distinct
clauses Kj 6= Kj 0 we selected a literal corresponding to the same variable xi , and we have Kj = Ki1
0
and Kj 0 = Ki3 , since in this case the paths P1j and P1j would share the edge {yi3 , r}. However,
selecting xi for Ki1 means xi takes value true in the truth assignment, while selecting xi for Ki3
means xi takes value false in the truth assignment, which is clearly a contradiction. A similar
observation applies to paths of terminals in C2 . It follows that installing one unit of capacity on
every edge that appears in (at least) one selected path is enough to support the flow of both color
sets. The total installation cost is exactly 8p + (M + 2)m.
3.2
Soundness
Suppose there is an optimal solution to the SAND instance of cost at most (M + 2)m + 8p. Let S
denote such solution. Since the support of any feasible solution has to include at least one distinct
edge of cost M for each node kj , and M > 2m + 8p, it follows that S has exactly m edges of cost
M in its support, each with one unit of capacity installed. Hence, if we denote by P1j (resp. P2j ) the
path used by kj to send flow to r with terminals in C1 (resp. C2 ), we have the following fact.
Fact 1. For each j = 1, . . . , m, the paths P1j and P2j from kj to r share the first edge.
We use this insight to construct a truth assignment for the SAT variables. Specifically, let yi`
be the endpoint of the first edge of P1j and P2j . We set xi to true if yi` = yi2 or if yi` = yi6 , and we
set xi to false if yi` = yi4 . We repeat this for all clauses j = 1, . . . , m, and we assign an arbitrary
truth value to all remaining variables, if any. In order to finish the proof, we have to show that this
assignment is consistent for all i = 1, . . . , p. To this aim, let us say that a variable xi is in conflict
if there is a node kj sending flow to r on a path whose first edge has endpoint yi4 , and there is
node kj 0 6= kj sending flow to r on a path whose first edge has endpoint yi2 or yi6 . Note that our
assignment procedure is consistent and yields indeed a valid truth assignment if and only if there is
no variable in conflict.
We now make a few claims on the structure of S, that will be useful to show that no variable
can be in conflict. Next fact follows from basic flow theory.
Fact 2. Without loss of generality, we can assume that the flow sent from terminals in C1 (resp. C2 )
to r, does not induce directed cycles.
Claim 3 Without loss of generality,
assume that every terminal sends flow to r on a path
Spwe can
1
that contains exactly one node y ∈ i=1 {yi , yi3 , yi5 , yi7 }.
We defer the proof of this claim which is central to the remaining proof to the end. Let Gi be the
subgraph of G induced by the nodes {r, yi1 , . . . , yi7 }, and let χi be the total costPof the capacity that
S installs on the subgraph Gi . Note that, by Fact 1, the cost of S is m · M + m
i=1 χi . We will use
Claim 1 to give a bound on the value χi . To this aim, let ni be the number of nodes kj whose path
P1j contains edges of Gi . Note that 0 ≤ ni ≤ 3, and each kj contributes to exactly one ni , for some
i = 1, . . . , p.
Claim 4 We have χi ≥ 8 + 2ni , with the inequality being strict if the variable xi is in conflict.
10
Claim 4 finishes our proof, since it implies that the cost of S is at least
m·M +
p
X
χi ≥ m · M +
i=1
p
X
(8 + 2ni ) = m · M + 8p + 2m,
i=1
with the inequality being tight if and only if there is no variable in conflict.
4
2
Latency SAND
As described in Section A, there is a Ω(log n) gap between the tree and graph version of f-SAND.
This naturally raises the question of approximating f-SAND when the solution must be restricted to
different topologies. In this section, we consider the f-SAND when the output topology must be a
path. Since this variant of f-SANDis not easy to solve on a tree, it is not clear how to solve it using
tree metrics.
Definition 4.1 In the latency-f-SAND problem, we are given an instance of f-SAND, but require the
output to be a path with the root r as one of its endpoints. Our goal is output a minimum cost path,
where the cost of an edge is we · (load on e). The load on an edge is the maximum number of nodes of
one color it separates from the root.
We assume that the lengths are integers and polynomially bounded in the input and give
a time-indexed length formulation for this problem. This linear programming formulation was
introduced by Chakrabarty and Swamy [4] for orienteering problems.
The Linear Programming Formulation for Latency-f-SAND
X
min
t · xj,t
(LPbP )
j,t
X
s.t.
xj,t ≥ 1
∀j ∈ [m]
(2)
zP,t ≤ 1
∀t ∈ [T ]
(3)
∀j ∈ [m], t ∈ [T ]
(4)
t
X
P ∈Pb·t
X
P ∈Pb·t :j∈P
zP,t ≥
X
xj,t0
t0 ≤t
x, z ≥ 0
We assume without loss of generality, that |Ci | = m for all i ∈ [k]. Pt denotes the set of paths
of weight at most t starting from the root. Since the lengths are polynomially bounded, we can
contain a variable for each possible length (we denote T to be the maximum possible length). We
use j ∈ Pt to indicate that the path Pt contains j terminals of each color. The variable xj,t indicates
that we have seen j terminals of each color by time t and zP,t indicates that we use path P to visit
the terminals at time t.
Lemma 4.2 The linear program LPbP is a relaxation of Latency-f-SANDfor b ≥ 1.
Proof. We show that the contraints and objective are valid for any feasible solution to Latency-fSAND.
11
• Constraint 2 ensures that j terminals of each color are covered at some given time period, for
every j ∈ [m].
• Constraint 3 ensures that only one path is (fractionally) picked for each time period t.
• Constraint
4 indicates that we must have picked a path P that covers j terminals by time t if
P
0
x
=
1.
0
t ≤t j,t
• The objective function correctly captures the cost of the path. For an integer solution, xj,t = 1
indicates that time t is the first time j terminals of each color are present in the path. Thus
the objective counts the prefix length t1 corresponding to where x1,t1 = 1 in all m of the terms,
the next prefix of length t2 − t1 in m − 1 of them and so on. This accurately accounts for the
loads in these segments of the path according to the objective function in f-SAND. Finally,
b ≥ 1 only allows the paths to be of lengths longer by a factor of b so keeps the optimal
solution feasible.
2
First, we can relax the above LP by replacing Pt with Tt which is the set of all trees of size at
most t. This is a relaxation as Pt ⊆ Tt . Lemma 4.3, shows that we can round LPbT to get a O(b)
approximation to latency-f-SAND.
Lemma 4.3 Given a fractional solution (x, z) to LPbT , we can round it to a solution to latency-f-SAND
with cost at most O(b) times the cost of LPbT .
We defer the proof to the appendix due to space constraints but briefly sketch the argument.
Roughly, we sample the trees at geometric intervals and “eulerify” them to produce a solution whose
cost is not too much larger than the LP-objective.
Despite, being able to round the LP, we cannot hope to solve it effeciently due to the exponential
number of variables in the primal. We will use the dual to obtain a solution to a relaxed version of
the primal.
X
X
max
αj −
βt
(DualbP )
j
t
αj ≤ t +
s.t.
X
θj,t0
∀j, t
(5)
∀t, P ∈ Pbt
(6)
t0 ≥t
X
θj,t ≤ βt
j∈P
α, β, θ ≥ 0.
(7)
Following [4] it is suffient that an “approximate separation oracle” in the sense of Lemma 4.4 is
sufficient to compute an optimal solution to LPbT .
Lemma 4.4 Given a solution (α, β, θ), we can show that either (α, β, θ) is a solution to Dual1T or find
a violated inequality for (α, β, θ) for DualbT for b = O(log2 k log n).
Once again, we defer the proof to the appendix, but sketch the argument. To efficiently separate,
we observe that constraint 6 can be recast as a covering Steiner tree problem. Using approximation
algorithms for this problem, we find a violated inequality for a (stronger) constraint. This results in
the “approximate separation oracle”.
12
Theorem 4.5 There exists a O(log2 k log n) approximation to the Latency-SAND problem.
Proof. Combining Lemma 3.2 of [4] with Lemma 4.4, we can now compute an -additive optimal
solution to LPbT for b = O(log2 k log n). Using Lemma 4.3, we then achieve an O(b) approximation
for our problem.
2
References
[1] M. Balcan, F. Constantin, S. Iwata, and L. Wang. Learning valuation functions. In Conference
on Learning Theory, volume 23, pages 4–1, 2012.
[2] W. Ben-Ameur and H. Kerivin. Routing of uncertain demands. Optimization and Engineering,
3:283–313, 2005.
[3] K. Bhawalkar and T. Roughgarden. Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item
bidding. In Proceedings of the twenty-second annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete
Algorithms, pages 700–709. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2011.
[4] D. Chakrabarty and C. Swamy. Facility location with client latencies: LP-based techniques for
minimum-latency problems. Mathematics of Operations Research, 41(3):865–883, 2016.
[5] C. Chekuri. Routing and network design with robustness to changing or uncertain traffic
demands. SIGACT News, 38(3):106–128, 2007.
[6] M. Chlebik and J. Chlebikova. Approximation hardness of the steiner tree problem on graphs.
Proceedings of the Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory, pages 170–170, 2002.
[7] N.G. Duffield, P. Goyal, A.G. Greenberg, P.P. Mishra, K.K. Ramakrishnan, and J.E. van der
Merwe. A flexible model for resource management in virtual private networks. Proceedings of
SIGCOMM, 29:95–108, 1999.
[8] J. Fakcharoenphol, S. Rao, and K. Talwar. A tight bound on approximating arbitrary metrics
by tree metrics. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 69:485–497, 2004.
[9] U. Feige. On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive. SIAM Journal on
Computing, 39(1):122–142, 2009.
[10] A.E. Feldmann, J. Könemann, K. Pashkovich, and L. Sanità. Fast approximation algorithms
for the generalized survivable network design problem. Proceedings of ISAAC (International
symposium on algorithms and computation), pages 33:1– 33:12, 2016.
[11] J. Fingerhut, S. Suri, and J. Turner. Designing least-cost nonblocking broadband networks.
Journal of Algorithms, 24(2):287–309, 1997.
[12] M.X. Goemans and D.P. Williamson. A general approximation technique for constrained forest
problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 24(2):296–317, 1995.
[13] N. Goyal, N. Olver, and F. B. Shepherd. Dynamic vs. oblivious routing in network design.
Algorithmica, 61(1):161–173, 2011.
[14] N. Goyal, N. Olver, and F. B. Shepherd. The VPN conjecture is true. Journal of the ACM,
60(3):17:1–17:17, June 2013.
13
[15] F. Grandoni, T. Rothvoß, and L. Sanità. From uncertainty to non-linearity: Solving virtual
private network via single-sink buy-at-bulk. Mathematics of Operations Research, 36(2):185–204,
2011.
[16] A. Gupta, J. Kleingerg, R. Kumar, B. Rastogi, and B. Yener. Provisioning a virtual private
network: A network design problem for multicommodity flow. Proceedings of Symposium on
Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 389–398, 2001.
[17] A. Gupta, V. Nagarajan, and R. Ravi. An improved approximation algorithm for requirement
cut. Operations Research Letters, 38(4):322–325, 2010.
[18] A. Gupta and A. Srinivasan. On the covering steiner problem. In International Conference
on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, pages 244–251.
Springer, 2003.
[19] K. Jain. A factor 2 approximation algorithm for the generalized steiner network problem.
Combinatorica, 21(1):39–60, 2001.
[20] G. Konjevod and R. Ravi. An approximation algorithm for the covering steiner problem. In
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA
’00, pages 338–344, 2000.
[21] B. Lehmann, D. Lehmann, and N. Nisan. Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal
utilities. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 18–28.
ACM, 2001.
[22] G. Oriolo, L. Sanità, and R. Zenklusen. Network design with a discrete set of traffic matrices.
Operations Research Letters, 41(4):390–396, 2013.
[23] M. Yannakakis. Node-and edge-deletion np-complete problems. In Proceedings of the tenth
annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 253–264. ACM, 1978.
A
Obstacles to an O(1)-approximation
f-SAND, while being a generalization of well-studied problems, cannot be easily approximated by
many common approximation techniques. This section presents some of the obstacles to getting a
O(1)-approximation for f-SAND.
A.1
Tree solutions are far from optimal
One of the most interesting (and frustrating) aspect of this problem is that a tree solution can be
far from optimal. This rules out many algorithms used for other network design problems (such as
the primal-dual “moat-growing”) as the resulting solution produced is a tree.
Lemma A.1 There exists a family of instances with a Ω(log n) gap between the best solution on a
graph and the best solution which is a tree. We emphasize that n is not the length of the input but the
number of nodes in the graph.
Proof. We adapt a construction from [13]. Consider an expander graph G = (V, E) with constant
degree d ≥ 3 and edge-expansion at least 1. Now let G0 be G with an additional node r, where r
14
has an edge to every vertex in V . Let the colors consist of all sets of size b = log n of the vertices,
V
n
b . All edges adjacent to the root r have cost b and the remaining edges have cost 1.
0
One valid graph solution on G is to take any b edges adjacent to r and then all the edges in
G. Consider any color Ci . Consider any subset S of vertices of V . By the expansion property of
G, the number of edges adjacent to S is at least |S| when |S| ≤ n/2, so δ(S) ≥ |S ∩ Ci |. When
|S| > n/2, at least n − |S| edges from G and at least b − (n − |S|) edges adjacent to r. Hence,
δ(S) ≥ b when |S| > n/2 implying δ(S) ≥ |S ∩ Ci |. Therefore a flow from Ci to r exists and this is
a feasible solution. This solution has cost 3 · n + b · n/b = 4n = O(n).
The original paper [13] presenting this example shows that any tree solution has cost Ω(n log n).
They prove this by arguing that either a large number of b cost edges adjacent must be used or
there must be a large number of long paths which are disjoint.
2
Therefore, if any algorithm always built a tree, we can’t expect to do better than Ω(log n). We
can achieve O(log n) with a tree solution by simply using FRT though. Therefore, any algorithm
which improves on O(log n) must avoid always build a tree.
A.2
A Bad Case for Iterative Rounding
We now give a set of examples which seems to rule out the iterative rounding approach due to
Jain [19]. This example comes from a special case of Kneser Graphs known as Odd Graphs. Odd
Graphs, denoted Os , contain a vertex for every s-size subset of [2s + 1]. We connect to sets
S, T ⊆ [2s + 1] in this graph iff S ∩ T = ∅. The graph has n = 2s+1
vertices and every vertex has
s
degree s + 1.
Our instance considers Os with an additional node r which will serve as the root. We connect the
root r to all other nodes in Os . The edges adjacent to the root r all have weight 2 and all the remaining
edges have weight 1. In a For any edge (u, v) ∈ E, we define a color Cuv = ({u} ∪ N (u)) − {v}
(i.e. u and u’s whole neighborhood except for v).
One valid fractional solution is for all the edges e, adjacent to the root to have xe = s+1
n , and all
the edges e, not adjacent to the root to have weight xe =
2n
s+1
s2 +1
−
(s+1)2
.
(s2 +1)n
So, the total cost is:
s + 1 n(s + 1) s + 1
(s + 1)2
n s+1
n 3
+
( 2
− 2
) ≈ 2(s + 1) + −
≈ + (s + 1)
n
2
s + 1 (s + 1)n
2
2
2 2
Any valid integral solution must have every node attached to the root. Therefore, the cost of
the minimum spanning tree is a lower bound on the cost of the best integral solution. The cost of
a minimum spanning tree is at least n + 1; there are n + 1 nodes in the whole graph, and all the
edges have weight 1 except for all the edges adjacent to the root which all have weight 2.
As s increases, then we get the ratio between the best fractional solution and the best integral
solution goes to 2. Therefore, the best approximation we can hope for when using this LP is 2.
In addition, we believe that the solution we gave above is an extreme point and can numerically
verify this for s ≤ 15 (a graph containing over 300 million vertices). The values xe get arbitrarily
close to 0 as s increases. This indicates that iterative rounding on this LP will not yield a constant
approximation.
B
B.1
Missing Proofs in Section 3
Proof of Claim 3
Proof. In order to prove this claim, it is enough to show that if S does not satisfy the condition
of the claim for some subset of terminals C ⊆ C1 ∪ C2 , then we can construct another solution S 0 ,
15
whose cost is at most the cost of S, that does not satisfy the condition of the claim for some subset
of nodes C 0 ⊂ C.
Let z ∈ Cq be an arbitrary terminal for
S which the condition of the claim is not satisfied, with
q ∈ {1, 2}, and let y be the first node in pi=1 {yi1 , yi3 , yi5 , yi7 } on its path P to r. By assumption, P
does not contain the edge e := {y, r}.
Suppose first that y = yi1 for some index i (the proof for y = yi7 is similar). Then, necessarily,
z = yi1 , and the first two edges of P are {yi1 , yi2 } and {yi2 , yi3 }. We construct S 0 by changing P with
the path formed by the single edge e = {yi1 , r}. If e is in the support of S, by Fact 2, there can be
only terminals in C2 using it, and therefore in S 0 we do not need to increase the capacity of any
edge. If instead the edge e is not in the support of S, then the node yi1 is a node of degree one in the
support of S. When we change the path for yi1 , in S 0 we have to increase the capacity of e to one.
On the other hand, we can decrease the amount of capacity of the edge {yi1 , yi2 } by one, since no
other terminal is using that edge. As for the edge {yi2 , yi3 }, note that this edge is either not used by
any terminal, or it is used by one terminal kj ∈ C1 ∩ C2 for some j. In both cases, we can decrease
its amount of capacity by one. It follows that the cost of S 0 is at most the cost of S, and C 0 ⊂ C.
Suppose now that y = yi3 for some index i (the proof for yi5 is similar). Then, necessarily, the
first two edges of the subpath P̃ ⊆ P from yi3 to r, are either {yi3 , yi2 } and {yi2 , yi1 }, or {yi3 , yi4 } and
{yi4 , yi5 }, and we have therefore two cases.
Case A: the first two edges of P̃ are {yi3 , yi2 } and {yi2 , yi1 }. Let q̄ ∈ {1, 2} be different from q. If
there is no terminal in Cq̄ whose path to r uses these edges, then changing P̃ to e = {yi3 , r} implies
increasing the capacity on e by one, and decreasing the capacity of the edges {yi3 , yi2 } and {yi2 , yi1 }
by one. This yields a solution S 0 with C 0 ⊂ C, whose cost is no greater than the cost of S. Suppose
now that there is a terminal z̄ in Cq̄ whose path uses both the edges {yi3 , yi2 } and {yi2 , yi1 }. Note
that z̄ 6= yi1 , since otherwise yi1 ∈ C but by the previous argument we can assume that this is not the
case. Therefore, necessarily, the flow going from z̄ to r travels first on the edge {yi3 , yi2 } and then on
{yi2 , yi1 } (i.e. the flow from z to r and the flow from z̄ to r induce the same orientation on these
edges). Then, in the solution S 0 we change the paths for both z and z̄, by substituting the subpaths
from yi3 to r with the edge e. Once again, this implies increasing the capacity on e by one, and
decreasing the capacity of the edges {yi3 , yi2 } and {yi2 , yi1 } by one, and therefore S 0 has C 0 ⊂ C, and
cost no greater than the cost of S. Finally, suppose that there is no terminal in Cq̄ whose path uses
both the edges {yi3 , yi2 } and {yi2 , yi1 }, but there is a terminal z̄ ∈ Cq̄ that uses exactly one of them.
Then, z̄ = ki1 . If Pq̄i1 is the path with nodes {ki1 , yi2 , yi1 , r}, then we construct S 0 by changing Pq̄i1
to the path with nodes {ki1 , yi2 , yi3 , r}, and by changing P̃ to e. This implies decreasing the capacity
on the edges {yi2 , yi1 } and {yi1 , r} by one, and increasing by one the capacity on the edges {yi2 , yi3 }
and {yi3 , r}. One can see that S 0 has C 0 ⊂ C, and cost no greater than the cost of S. If instead Pq̄i1
is not the path with nodes {ki1 , yi2 , yi1 , r}, then necessarily the second edge of Pq̄i1 is {yi2 , yi3 }. By
Fact 2, this implies that there is no terminal of Cq̄ using the edge {yi1 , r}, other than possibly yi1 .
Furthermore, by Fact 1, we know that also the first edge of Pqi1 is {kj , yi2 }, and by Fact 2, the other
edges of Pqi1 are {yi2 , yi1 } and {yi1 , r}. This implies that the capacity of the edge {yi1 , r} is at least 2
in S. If we construct S 0 by changing P̃ to e, we can decrease the capacity of the edge {yi1 , r} by
one, and increase the capacity on e by one. Once again, the result follows.
Case B: the first two edges of P̃ are {yi3 , yi4 } and {yi4 , yi5 }. If there is no terminal in Cq̄ using the
edges {yi3 , yi4 } and {yi4 , yi5 }, or if there is a terminal z̄ ∈ Cq̄ that uses (at least one of) these edges,
but such that the flow going from z to r and the flow from z̄ to r induce the same orientation on
these edges, then the statement follows similarly to the previous Case A. The only additional case
we have to handle here, arises if there is a terminal z̄ ∈ Cq̄ that uses the edge {yi3 , yi4 } but such
that the flow from z̄ to r and the flow from z to r induce opposite orientation on this edge. In this
16
case, by the arguments of Case A, we can assume that the flow from z̄ to r travels on the edge
e = {yi3 , r}. Therefore, if there is no terminal in Cq using e we construct S 0 by simply changing
P̃ to e. One sees that S 0 has the same cost as S and C 0 ⊂ C. Suppose instead that there is some
terminal in Cq using e. Then, necessarily q 6= 1 (because the only terminal in C1 different from z
that could potentially use e without violating Fact 2 is yi1 , but we already argued that yi1 routes on
the edge {yi1 , r}). Furthermore, using again Fact 2, we can say that there is exactly one terminal z̃
in C2 routing on e, and we have either z̃ = yi3 and z̄ = ki1 , or z̄ = yi3 and z̃ = ki1 . In either case, by
Fact 1 and Fact 2, we know that P1i1 must contain the edges {yi2 , yi1 } and {yi1 , r}. We construct S 0
by changing P̃ to e, and by changing P2i1 to be equal to P1i1 . One can see that these changes do not
require increasing the capacity on any edge, and therefore the result follows.
2
B.2
Proof of Claim 4
Proof.
First, observe that a straightforward corollary of Claim 3 is that every terminal y ∈
Sp
1 , y 3 , y 5 , y 7 } sends flow to r on the path {y, r}. Let ñ ≤ n be the number of nodes k
{y
i
i
j
i
i
i
i=1 i
j
j
that use edges of Gi to route flow to r and, in addition, satisfy P1 = P2 . Using the previous
observation, the cost of the capacity on the edges E1 ∩ E(Gi ) is at least 2(4 + ñi ). Furthermore,
another consequence of Claim 1 is that if a terminal kj uses edges of Gi to route flow to r, and the
paths P1j and P2j share the second edge, then P1j = P2j and these paths contain exactly one edge of
E2 (and one edge of E1 ). It follows that the capacity installed on the edges E2 ∩ E(Gi ) is exactly
ñi + 2(ni − ñi ) = 2ni − ñi . Putting things together,
χi ≥ 2(4 + ñi ) + 2ni − ñi = 8 + 2ni + ñi ≥ 8 + 2ni
(8)
We now prove that if xi is in conflict, then either the first or the last inequality of (8) is strict. If xi
is in conflict, then ni > 1. Suppose ni = 2, and let kj , kj 0 be the terminals that use edges of Gi to
route flow to r. Without loss of generality, let the endpoint of the first edge of Pj1 be yi2 , and the
endpoint of the first edge of Pj10 be yi4 (the other case is similar). If ñi > 0 then the last inequality
0
0
of (8) is strict. If instead ñi = 0, we know that P1j and P2j as well as P1j and P2j do not share the
second edge. In this case, the cost of the capacity installed on the edges E2 ∩ E(Gi ) is 4. However,
we need 2 units of capacity on at least one edge of E1 ∩ E(Gi ), implying that the cost of the capacity
installed on the edges E1 ∩ E(Gi ) is at least 10, and therefore χi is at least 14 > 8 + 2ni .
Suppose ni = 3. As in the previous case, if ñi > 0 the last inequality of (8) is strict. If instead
ñi = 0, then all the paths used by these ni terminals to route flow to r do not share the second
edge. Then, the cost of the capacity installed on the edges E2 ∩ E(Gi ) is 6. However, in this case
we also need 2 units of capacity on at least two edges of E1 ∩ E(Gi ), implying that the cost of the
capacity installed on the edges E1 ∩ E(Gi ) is at least 12, and therefore χi ≥ 18 > 8 + 2ni .
2
C
C.1
Missing Proofs in Section 4
Proof of Lemma 4.3
Proof. For each time t = 2i for i = 0, . . . , log L, sample a tree based on the distribution zT ,t - here
L is an upper bound on the length of a tree that covers all colors, such as the value of an MST on
them. Denote the tree sampled at time t by Tt . We “Eulerify” (walk around the tree) Tt into a
path Pt which starts and ends at r. This path Pt has length at most 2bt. Now our solution will be
the path formed by concatenating P1 , P2 , P4 , . . . , PL . This is a feasible solution because at time 2L
17
we are able to pick up all the nodes of all colors by taking a path around a spanning tree. (By using
standard scaling methods [4], we can reduce the log L factor in this sampling to O(log n) to get a
strongly polynomial algorithm - we omit the details.)
Now we show that the expected P
cost of this solution is O(b) times the cost of the linear program.
Let tj denote the first time when t xj,t ≥ 2/3. Then, we know the contribution of the xj,t to
the objective function is at least 13 tj . For every time t0 ≥ tj the probability the tree we pick has j
elements of each color is at least 2/3 by our definition of tj . So, the expected length of the path
before we get j elements of each colors in the path is given by a geometric sum.
∞
X
Pr[ j ∈ T2i and j ∈
/ T2i−1 ](Cost of the first i trees)
i=log tj
∞
X
2 1 i−log tj
=
(4b2i )
3 3
i=log tj
∞
8 log tj X i−log tj 1 i−log tj
2
= b2
3
3
i=log tj
8
= btj
3
∞
X
i=0
2i
3
16
= btj
3
Since the contribution of the xj,t to the objective function is at least 13 tj , the expected cost of the
whole path is at most O(b) times the cost of the LP.
2
C.2
Proof of Lemma 4.4
Proof. Given (α, β, θ), it is easy to verify all constraints except for Equation 6. We interpret θj,t
to be the reward for collecting j terminals of each color by time t and βt to be the budget by time t.
This constraint says that we want to ensure that every path (tree in the relaxation) rooted at r of
length at most bt can achieve no more than βt rewards.
To find a violated constraint, we solve a covering Steiner tree problem [20], one for each j:
the problem is defined by k groups one for each color Ci and we require that each group has j
terminals connected using the smallest length tree. Using the best-known approximation algorithm
for covering Steiner tree [18] we obtain an approximation factor of b = O(log2 k log n). Now we can
check for each time t, if the rewards collected are bounded above by the budget βt where we allow
trees of size bt.
2
18
| 8cs.DS
|
Flexible Resource Allocation for Clouds and
All-Optical Networks
Dmitriy Katz1 , Baruch Schieber1 , and Hadas Shachnai2?
arXiv:1605.04982v1 [cs.DS] 16 May 2016
1
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.
E-mail: {katzrog,sbar}@us.ibm.com
2
Computer Science Department, Technion, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract. Motivated by the cloud computing paradigm, and by key
optimization problems in all-optical networks, we study two variants of
the classic job interval scheduling problem, where a reusable resource is
allocated to competing job intervals in a flexible manner. Each job, Ji ,
requires the use of up to rmax (i) units of the resource, with a profit of
pi ≥ 1 accrued for each allocated unit. The goal is to feasibly schedule a
subset of the jobs so as to maximize the total profit. The resource can be
allocated either in contiguous or non-contiguous blocks. These problems
can be viewed as flexible variants of the well known storage allocation
and bandwidth allocation problems.
We show that the contiguous version is strongly NP-hard, already for
instances where all jobs have the same profit and the same maximum
resource requirement. For such instances, we derive the best possible
positive result, namely, a polynomial time approximation scheme. We
further show that the contiguous variant admits a ( 45 + ε)-approximation
algorithm, for any fixed ε > 0, on instances whose job intervals form a
proper interval graph. At the heart of the algorithm lies a non-standard
parameterization of the approximation ratio itself, which is of independent interest.
For the non-contiguous case, we uncover an interesting relation to the
paging problem that leads to a simple O(n log n) algorithm for uniform
profit instances of n jobs. The algorithm is easy to implement and is thus
practical.
1
Introduction
1.1
Background and Motivation
Interval scheduling is one of the basic problems in the study of algorithms, with
a wide range of applications in computer science and in operations research (see,
e.g., [17]). We focus on scheduling intervals with resource requirements. In this
?
This work was partly carried out during a visit to DIMACS supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number CCF-1144502.
model, we have a set of intervals (or, activities) competing for a reusable resource.3 Each activity utilizes a certain amount of the resource for the duration
of its execution and frees it upon completion. The problem is to find a feasible
schedule of the activities that satisfies certain constraints, including the requirement that the total amount of resource allocated simultaneously to activities
never exceeds the amount of resource available.
In this classic model, two well-studied variants are the storage allocation
(see, e.g., [18,5]), and the bandwidth allocation problems (see, e.g., [3,10]). In
the storage allocation problem (sap), each activity requires the allocation of a
contiguous block of the resource for the duration of its execution. Thus, the
input is often viewed as a set of axis-parallel rectangles; and the goal is to pack
a maximum profit subset of rectangles into a horizontal strip of a given height,
by sliding the rectangles vertically but not horizontally. When the resource can
be allocated in non-contiguous blocks, we have the bandwidth allocation (ba)
problem, where we only need to allocate to each activity the required amount of
the resource.
Scheduling problems of this ilk arise naturally in scenarios where activities
require (non-contiguous or contiguous) portion of an available resource, with
some revenue associated with the allocated amount. In the cloud computing
paradigm, the resource can be servers in a large computing cluster, storage capacity, or bandwidth allocated to time-critical jobs (see, e.g. [14,20]).
In flexgrid all-optical networks, the resource is the available spectrum of
light that is divided into frequency intervals of variable width, with a gap of
unused frequencies between them (see, e.g., [15,13]). Several high-speed signals
connecting different source-destination pairs may share a link, provided they are
assigned disjoint sub-spectra (see, e.g., in [22]). Given a path network and a set
of connection requests, represented by intervals, each associated with a profit
per allocated spectrum unit and a maximum bandwidth requirement, we need
to feasibly allocate frequencies to the requests, with the goal of maximizing the
total profit. In the fbap variant the sub-spectra allocated to each request need
not be contiguous, while in the fsap variant each request requires a contiguous
frequency spectrum.
1.2
Problem Statement
We consider a variant of sap where each interval can be allocated any amount
of the resource up to its maximum requirement, with a profit accrued from each
resource unit allocated to it. The goal is to schedule the intervals contiguously,
subject to resource availability, so as to maximize the total profit. We refer to
this variant below as the flexible storage allocation problem (fsap).
We also consider the flexible bandwidth allocation (fbap) problem, where
each interval specifies an upper bound on the amount of the resource it can be
allocated, as well as the profit accrued from each allocated unit of the resource.
3
Throughout the paper, we use the terms ‘intervals’ and ‘activities’ interchangeably.
2
The goal is to determine the amount of resource allocated to each interval so as
to maximize the total profit.
Formally, in our general framework, the input consists of a set J of n intervals. Each interval Ji ∈ J requires the utilization of a given, limited, resource.
The amount of resource available, denoted by W > 0, is fixed over time. Each
interval Ji is defined by the following parameters.
(1) A left endpoint, si ≥ 0, and a right endpoint, ei ≥ 0. In this case Ji is
associated with the half-open interval [si , ei ) on the real line.
(2) The amount of resource allocated each interval, Ji , which can take any value
up to the maximum possible value for Ji , given by rmax (i).
(3) The profit pi ≥ 1 gained for each unit of the resource allocated to Ji .
A feasible solution has to satisfy the following conditions. (i) Each interval Ji ∈ J is allotted an amount of the resource in its given range. (ii) The
total amount of the resource allocated at any time does not exceed the available amount, W . In fbap, we seek a feasible allocation which maximizes the
total profit accrued by the intervals. In fsap, we add the requirement that the
allocation to each interval is a contiguous block of the resource.
Given an algorithm A, let A(J ), OP T (J ) denote the profit of A and an
optimal solution for a problem instance J , respectively. For ρ ≥ 1, we say that
T (J )
A is a ρ-approximation algorithm if, for any instance J , OP
A(J ) ≤ ρ.
1.3
Our Contribution
We derive both positive and negative results. On the positive side, we uncover
an interesting relation of fbap to the classic paging problem that leads to a
simple O(n log n) algorithm for uniform profit instances (see Section 3). Thus,
we substantially improve the running time of the best known algorithm for fbap
(due to [25]) which uses flow techniques. Our algorithm is easy to implement and
is thus practical.
On the negative side, we show (in Section 5) that fsap is strongly NP-hard,
already for instances where all jobs have the same profit and the same maximum
resource requirement. For such instances, we derive the best possible positive
2k
result, namely, a PTAS. We also present (in the Appendix) a 2k−1
-approximation
W
algorithm, where k = d Max e, which is of practical interest. We further show (in
Section 4) that fsap admits a ( 54 + ε)-approximation algorithm, for any fixed
ε > 0, on instances whose job intervals form a proper interval graph.
Techniques: Our Algorithm, Paging fba, for the non-contiguous version of the
problem, uses an interesting relation to the offline paging problem. The key idea
is to view the available resource as slots in fast memory, and each job (interval) Ji
as rmax (i) pairs of requests for pages in the main memory. Each pair of requests
is associated with a distinct page: one request at si and one at ei − 1. We apply
Belady’s offline paging algorithm that − in case of a page fault − evicts the
page that is requested furthest in the future (see Section 3). If a page remains in
the fast memory between the two times it was requested, then the resource that
3
corresponds to its fast memory slot is allocated to the corresponding job. In fact,
Paging fba solves the flexible bandwidth allocation problem optimally for more
general instances, where each interval Ji has also a lower bound, 0 < rmin (i) on
the amount of resource Ji is allocated.4
At the heart of our ( 45 + ε)-approximation algorithm for proper instances lies
a non-standard parameterization of the approximation ratio itself. Specifically,
the algorithm uses a parameter β ∈ {0, 1} to guess the fraction of total profit
obtained by wide intervals, i.e., intervals with high maximum resource requirement, in some optimal solution. If the profit from these intervals is at least this
fraction β of the optimum for the given instance, such a high profit subset of
wide intervals is found by the algorithm; else, the algorithm proceeds to find
a high profit subset of narrow and wide intervals, by solving an LP relaxation
of a modified problem instance. In solving this instance, we require that the
profit from extra units of the resource assigned to wide intervals (i.e., above certain threshold value) is bounded by a β fraction of the optimum (see Section
4). This tighter constraint guarantees a small loss in profit when rounding the
(fractional) solution for the LP. The approximation ratio of ( 54 + ε) is attained
by optimizing on the value of β. We believe this novel technique can lead to
better approximation algorithms for other problems as well.
1.4
Related Work
The classic interval scheduling problem, where each interval requires all of the
resource for its execution, is solvable in O(n log n) time [3]. The storage allocation
problem (sap) is NP-hard, since it includes Knapsack as a special case. sap was
first studied in [3,18]. Bar-Noy et al. [3] presented an approximation algorithm
that yields a ratio of 7. Chen et al. [11] presented a polynomial time exact
algorithm for the special case where all resource requirements are multiples of
W/K, for some fixed integer K ≥ 1. Bar-Yehuda et al. [4] presented a randomized
algorithm for sap with ratio 2 + ε, and a deterministic algorithm with ratio
2e−1
e−1 + ε < 2.582. The best known result is a deterministic (2 + ε)-approximation
algorithm due to [23].
The bandwidth allocation (ba) problem is known to be strongly NP-hard,
already for uniform profits [12]. The results of Albers et al. [1] imply a constant
factor approximation (where the constant is about 22). The ratio was improved
to 3 by Bar-Noy et al. [3]. Calinescu et al. [8] developed a randomized approximation algorithm for ba with expected performance ratio of 2 + ε, for every
ε > 0. The best known result is an LP-based deterministic (2+ε)-approximation
algorithm for ba due to Chekuri et al. [10].
Both ba and sap have been widely studied also in the non-uniform resource
case, where the amount of available resource may change over time. In this
setting, ba can be viewed as the unsplittable flow problem (UFP) on a path. The
best known result is a (2+ε)-approximation algorithm due to Anagnostopoulos et
al. [2]. Batra et al.[6] obtained approximation schemes for some spacial cases.5
4
5
In obtaining all other results, we assume that rmin (i) = 0 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
See also the recent results on UFP with Bag constraints (BagUFP) [9].
4
For sap with non-uniform resource, the best known ratio is 2 + ε, obtained by a
randomized algorithm of Mömke and Wiese [21].
The flexible variants of sap and ba were introduced by Shalom et al.[25].
The authors study instances where each interval i has a minimum and a maximum resource requirement, satisfying 0 ≤ rmin (i) < rmax (i) ≤ W , and the
goal is to find a maximum profit schedule, such that the amount of resource
allocated to each interval i is in [rmin (i), rmax (i)]. The authors show that fbap
can be optimally solved using flow techniques. The paper also presents a 43 approximation algorithm for fsap instances in which the input graph is proper,
(i)
e, for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n. The paper [24] shows NP-hardness
and rmin (i) ≤ d rmax
2
of fsap instances where each interval has positive lower and upper bounds on
the amount of resource it can be allocated. The problem remains difficult even if
the bounds are identical for all activities, i.e., rmin (i) = Min and rmax (i) = Max,
for all i, where 0 < Min < Max ≤ W . The authors also show that fsap is NPhard for the subclass of instances where rmin (i) = 0 and rmax (i) is arbitrary, for
all i, and present a (2 + ε)-approximation algorithm for such instances, for any
fixed ε > 0. We strengthen the hardness result of [24], by showing that fsap is
strongly NP-hard even if rmin (i) = 0 and rmax (i) = Max, for all i.
Finally, the paper [23] considers variants of fsap and fbap where 0 ≤
rmin (i) < rmax (i) ≤ W , and the goal is to feasibly schedule a subset S of the
intervals of maximum total profit (namely, the amount of resource allocated to
each interval i ∈ S is in [rmin (i), rmax (i)]). The paper presents a 3-approximation
algorithm for this version of fbap, and a (3 + ε)-approximation for the corresponding version of fsap, for any fixed ε > 0.
2
Preliminaries
We represent the input J as an interval graph, G = (V, E), in which the set of
vertices, V , represents the n jobs, and there is an edge (vi , vj ) ∈ E if the intervals
representing the jobs Ji , Jj intersect. For simplicity, we interchangeably use Ji
to denote the i-th job, and the interval representing the i-th job on the realline. We say that an input J is proper, if in the corresponding interval graph
G = (V, E), no interval Ji is properly contained in another interval Jj , for all
1 ≤ i, j ≤ n.
Throughout the paper, we use coloring terminology when referring to the assignment of bandwidth to the jobs. Specifically, the amount of available resource,
W , can be viewed as the amount of available distinct colors. Thus, the demand
of a job Ji for (contiguous) allocation from the resource, where the allocated
amount is an integer in the range [0, rmax (i)], can be satisfied by coloring Ji
with a (contiguous) set of colors, of size in the range [0, rmax (i)].
Let C = {1, 2, . . . , W } denote the set of available colors. Recall that in a
contiguous coloring, c, each interval Ji is assigned a block of |c(Ji )| consecutive
colors in {1, . . . , W }. In a circular contiguous coloring, c, we have the set of
colors positioned consecutively on a circle. Each interval Ji ∈ J is assigned a
block of |c(Ji )| consecutive colors on the circle. Formally, Ji can be assigned
5
any consecutive sequence of |c(Ji )| indices, {`, (` mod W ) + 1, . . . , [(` + |c(Ji )| −
2) mod W ]+1}, where 1 ≤ ` ≤ W . Given a coloring of the intervals, c : J → 2C ,
let |c(Ji )|P
be the number of colors assigned to Ji , then the total profit accrued
n
from c is i=1 pi |c(Ji )|.
Let S ⊆ J be the subset of jobs Ji for which |c(Ji )| ≥ 1 in a (contiguous)
coloring C for the input graph G. We call the subgraph of G induced by S,
denoted GS = (S, ES ), the support graph of S.
3
The Flexible Bandwidth Allocation Problem
In this section we study fbap, the non-contiguous version of our problem. We
consider a generalized version of fbap, where each activity i has also a lower
bound rmin (i) on the amount of resource it is allocated.
Shalom et al.[25] showed that this generalized fbap can be solved optimally
by using flow techniques. We show that in the special case where all jobs have
the same (unit) profit per allocated color (i.e., resource unit), the problem can
be solved by an efficient algorithm based on Belady’s well known algorithm for
offline paging [7]. From now on, assume that we have a feasible instance, that is,
there are enough colors to allocate at least rmin (i) colors to each job Ji .
To gain some intuition, assume first that rmin (i) = 0 for all i ∈ [1..n]. We
view the available colors as slots in fast memory, and each job (interval) Ji as
rmax (i) pairs of requests for pages in the main memory. Each pair of requests
is associated with a distinct page: one request at si and one at ei − 1. We now
apply Belady’s offline paging algorithm: if a page remains in the fast memory
between the two times it was requested, then the color that corresponds to its
fast memory slot is allocated to the corresponding job.
When rmin (i) > 0, we follow the same intuition while allocating at least
rmin (i) colors to each Ji , to ensure feasibility. We show below that the optimality
of the paging algorithm implies the optimality of the solution for our fbap
instance.
The algorithm is implemented iteratively, by reassigning colors as follows.
The algorithm scans the left endpoints of the intervals, from left to right. When
the algorithm scans si , it first assigns rmin (i) colors to Ji to ensure feasibility.
The algorithm starts by assigning the available colors. If there are less than
rmin (i) colors available at si , the algorithm examines the intervals intersecting
Ji at si in decreasing order of right endpoints, and feasibly decreases the number
of colors assigned to these intervals and reassigns them to Ji , until Ji is allocated
rmin (i) colors. The feasibility of the instance implies that so many colors can be
reassigned.
Next, the algorithm allocates up to rmax (i) − rmin (i) additional colors to
interval Ji , to maximize profit. If rmax (i) − rmin (i) colors are available at si ,
then they are assigned to Ji . If so many colors are unavailable, and thus Ji is
assigned less than rmax (i) colors, then the algorithm follows Belady’s algorithm
to potentially assign additional colors to Ji . The algorithm examines the intervals intersecting Ji at si , and in case there are such intervals with larger right
6
endpoint than ei , it feasibly decreases the number of colors assigned to such
intervals with the largest right endpoints (furthest in the future), and increases
the number of colors assigned to Ji , up to rmax (i).
When the algorithm scans ei , the right endpoint of an interval Ji , the colors
assigned to Ji are released and become available. The pseudocode for Paging fba
is given in the Appendix (see Algorithm 2).
Theorem 1. Paging fba is an optimal O(n log n) time algorithm, for any fbap
instance where pi = 1 for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
Proof. Given an instance of fbap, where pi = 1 for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n, define a
respective multipaging problem instance, where the size of the fast memory is
W , as follows. (The multipaging problem is a variant of the paging problem,
where more than one page is requested at the same time.) For each job Ji ∈ J
define two types of page requests: feasibility requests and profit requests. For
each si ≤ t < ei there are rmin (i) feasibility requests for the same rmin (i) pages.
In addition there are rmax (i) − rmin (i) pairs of requests for rmax (i) − rmin (i)
distinct pages. The first request of each pair is at si and the second at ei − 1.
It is not difficult to see that Belady’s algorithm is optimal also for the multipaging problem [19]. Consider an implementation of Belady’s algorithm for this
instance where the feasibility requests are always processed before the profit requests. In this case it is easy to see that none of the pages that are requested
in the feasibility requests will be evicted before the last time in which they are
requested. Note that Paging fba implements this variant of Belady’s algorithm,
where AVAIL corresponds to the available memory slots. The optimality of Belady’s algorithm guarantees that the number of page faults is minimized. The
page faults
Pnwhenever a new page is requested cannot be avoided. (Note that
there are i=1 rmax (i) such faults.) Additional page faults may occur when the
second occurrence of a page in the pairs of the profit requests needs to be accessed. Minimizing the number of such page faults is equivalent to maximizing
the number of pairs of profit requests for which the requested page is in memory throughout the interval [si , ei ), that is, maximizing the profit of allocated
resources in the fbap instance. Paging fba can be implemented in O(n log n)
time, by noting that the total number of color reassignments is linear, and that
once we sort the intervals by left endpoints, the ‘active’ intervals can be stored
in a priority queue by right endpoints to implement the reassignments.
4
Approximating Flexible Storage Allocation
In this section we consider the flexible storage allocation problem. We focus below
on fsap instances in which the jobs form a proper interval graph, and give an
approximation algorithm that yields a ratio of ( 45 +ε) to optimal. Our Algorithm,
Proper fsap, uses the parameters ε > 0 and β ∈ (0, 1) (to be determined).
Initially, Proper fsap guesses the value of an optimal solution OP T fsap (J ).
(The guessing is done by binary search and it is straightforward to verify by the
7
results of Proper fsap whether the guess is correct, or whether it is under or
above the optimal value.)
Let Jwide denote the set of wide intervals Ji for which rmax (i) ≥ εW . Let
Jnarrow denote the complement set of narrow intervals. If the profit from the
wide intervals that are actually assigned at least εW colors is large, namely,
at least β · OP T fsap (J ), then such a high profit subset of intervals is found
and returned by the algorithm as the solution. Otherwise, Proper fsap calls
Algorithm AN arrow Color that finds a solution of high profit accrued from both
narrow and wide intervals. The pseudocode for Proper fsap follows.
Algorithm 1 Proper fsap(J , r̄max , p̄, W, ε, β)
1: Guess the value of OP T fsap (J ), the optimal solution of fsap on the input
J.
2: Find in Jwide a solution S of fsap with maximum total profit among all
solutions in which intervals that are assigned colors are assigned at least
dεW e colors.
3: if P (S) < βOP Tfsap (J ) then
4:
Let S be the solution output by AN arrow Color (J , r̄max , p̄, W, ε, βOP T fsap (J ))
5: end if
6: Return S and the respective contiguous coloring
We now describe Algorithm AN arrow Color that finds an approximate solution
for fsap in case the extra profit of the wide intervals − above the profit of their
first dεW e assigned colors − is bounded by β fraction of the optimal solution.
First, AN arrow Color solves a linear program LPfba that finds a (fractional)
maximum profit solution of the fbap problem on the set J , in which the number
of colors used is no more than (1 − ε)W . Note that, according to our guess, the
value of the solution is at least (1 − ε)OP Tfsap (J ). This is since the value of the
optimal solution for LPfba when all W colors are used is at least OP Tfsap (J ).
The solution needs to satisfy an upper bound on the extra profit accrued from
wide intervals that are assigned more than εW colors.
Next, this solution is rounded to an integral solution of the fbap instance,
of value at least (1 − 2ε)OP T fsap (J ). AN arrow Color proceeds by converting the
resulting (non-contiguous) coloring to a contiguous circular coloring with the
same profit. Finally, this coloring is converted to a valid (non-circular) coloring.
In this part, AN arrow Color searches for the ‘best’ index for ‘cutting’ the circular
coloring. This is done by examining a polynomial number of integral points,
` ∈ [1, (1 − ε)W ], and calculating in each the loss in profit due to eliminating
at most half of the colors for each wide interval whose (contiguous) color set
includes color `. The algorithm ‘cuts the circle’ in the point ` which causes
the smallest harm to the total profit. For each wide interval Ji crossing `, we
assign the largest among its first block of colors (whose last color is `), or the
second block of colors (which starts at ` mod b(1 − ε)W c + 1). For each narrow
8
interval that included `, we assign the same number of new colors in the range
[(1 − ε)W, W ]. We give the pseudocode of AN arrow Color in Algorithm 3 in the
Appendix.
4.1
Analysis of Proper fsap
Our main result is the following.
Theorem 2. Proper fsap is a ( 45 +ε)-approximation algorithm for any instance
of fsap in which the input graph is proper.
We prove the theorem using the following results. First, we consider the case
where there exists an optimal solution of fsap in which the profit from the
intervals in Jwide that are assigned at least εW colors is at least βOP T fsap (J ).
Lemma 3 If there exists an optimal solution of fsap for J in which the profit
from the intervals in Jwide that are assigned at least εW colors is at least
βOP T fsap (J ), then a solution of profit at least βOP T fsap (J ) can be found in
polynomial time.
Proof. We consider only the intervals in Jwide and the set of feasible solutions S
with the property that each interval in S is assigned at least εW colors. Note that
for each such feasible solution, at any time t > 0, the number of active intervals
is bounded by 1/ε, which is a constant. Hence, we can use dynamic programming
to find a solution of maximum profit among all these feasible solutions.6 By our
assumption, the value of this solution is at least βOP T fsap (J ).
Next, we consider the complement case. In Figure 1 we give the linear program used by Algorithm AN arrow Color . For each Ji ∈ Jnarrow the linear program has a variable xi indicating the number of colors assigned to Ji . For each
Ji ∈ Jwide , the linear program has two variables: xi and yi , where xi + yi is the
number of colors assigned to Ji ; yi gives the number of assigned colors “over”
the first dεW e colors.
Constraint (1) bounds the total profit from the extra allocation for each
interval Ji ∈ Jwide . The constraints (2) bound the total number of colors used
at any time t > 0 by (1 − ε)W . We note that the number of constraints in (2)
is polynomial in |J |, since we only need to consider the “interesting” points of
time t, when t = si for some interval Ji ∈ J , i.e., we have at most n constraints.
Lemma 4 For any ε > 0, there is an integral solution of LP fba of total profit
at least (1 − 2ε)OP T fsap (J ).
Proof. Let x̄∗ , ȳ ∗ be an optimal (fractional) solution of LP fba . Note that, by
possibly move value from yi∗ to x∗i , we can always find such a solution in which
for any Ji ∈ Jwide , if yi∗ > 0 then x∗i = dεW e.
6
This is similar to the dynamic programming algorithm for bounded load instances
given in [25]. Thus, we omit the details.
9
(LP fba ) :
max
X
Ji ∈Jnarrow
s.t.
X
X
p i xi +
pi (xi + yi )
Ji ∈Jwide
pi yi ≤ β(1 − ε)OP Tfsap (J )
(1)
Ji ∈Jwide
X
X
xi +
{Ji ∈J :t∈Ji }
yi ≤ (1 − ε)W
∀t > 0 (2)
{Ji ∈Jwide :t∈Ji }
0 ≤ xi ≤ min{rmax (i), dεW e}
0 ≤ yi ≤ rmax (i) − dεW e
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n
for Ji ∈ Jwide
.
Fig. 1: The linear program LPfba
Let Sw be the set of intervals in Jwide for which yi > 0. Consider now the
solution x̄∗ , z̄, where zi = byi∗ c, for all Ji ∈ Sw . We bound the loss due to the
rounding down.
P
P
Ji ∈Sw pi (xi + byi c) ≥ PJi ∈Sw pi (xi + yi − 1)
≥ Ji ∈Sw pi (xi + yi )(1 − x1i )
P
1
≥ Ji ∈Sw pi (xi + yi )(1 − dεW
e)
The last inequality follows from the fact that xi = dεW e, for any Ji ∈ Sw . Thus,
for W ≥ 1/ε2 , we have that the total profit after rounding the yi values is at
least (1 − 2ε)OP T fba (J ).
Now, consider the linear program LPround , in which we fix bi = byi∗ c, for
Ji ∈ Sw . We have that x̄∗ is a feasible (fractional) solution of LP round with
(LP round ) :
max
n
X
pi xi
i=1
s.t.
X
{Ji ∈J :t∈Ji }
X
xi +
bi ≤ (1 − ε)W ∀t > 0
{Ji ∈Sw :t∈Ji }
0 ≤ xi ≤ min{rmax (i), dεW e}
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n
P
profit at least (1 − 2ε)OP T fba (J ) − Ji ∈Sw pi bi . The rows of the coefficient
matrix of LP round can be permuted so that the time points associated with
the rows form an increasing sequence. In the permuted matrix each column has
consecutive 1’s, thus this matrix is totally unimodular (TU). It follows that we
can find in polynomial time an integral solution, x̄∗I , of the same total profit.
Thus, the integral solution x̄∗I , z̄ satisfies the lemma.
10
0
Lemma 5 Let P (c0 (Sw
)), P (c0 (Sn0 )) be the total profit from the intervals in the
0
0
sets Sw and Sn in the circular coloring c0 generated in Step 3. of AN arrow Color .
0
0
Then, (i) P (c00 (Sw
)) ≥ 34 P (c0 (Sw
)), and (ii) P (c00 (Sn0 )) = P (c0 (Sn0 )).
Proof. Property (i) follows from a result of [25], which implies that the non0
circular contiguous coloring c00 , obtained for Sw
in Steps 17−18 of AN arrow Color ,
3
0
0
has a total profit at least 4 P (c (Sw )). As shown in [25], this algorithm can be
implemented in polynomial time.
Also, (ii) holds since (in Steps 22−23) Algorithm AN arrow Color assigns
|c0 (Ji )| colors to any Ji ∈ Sn0 , i.e., in the resulting non-circular contiguous coloring, c00 , we have |c00 (Ji )| = |c0 (Ji )|, ∀ Ji ∈ Sn0 . We note that c00 is a valid coloring,
since at most one interval (in particular, an interval Ji ∈ Sn0 ) can be assigned the
color `good at any time t > 0. It follows, that the intervals Ji in Sn0 that contain
in c0 (Ji ) `good form an independent set. Since, for any Ji ∈ Sn0 , rmax (i) ≤ dεW e,
we can assign to all of these intervals the same set of new colors in the range
{b(1 − ε)W c + 1, . . . , W }.
Proof of Theorem 2: Let 0 < β < 1 be the parameter used by Proper fsap.
For a correct guess of OP T fsap (J ) and a fixed value of ε > 0, let ε̂ = ε/3.
(i) If there is an optimal solution in which the profit from the intervals in Jwide
that are assigned at least εW colors is at least βOP T fsap (J ) then, by Lemma
3, Proper fsap finds in Step 2 a solution of profit at least βOP Tfsap (J ) in
polynomial time.
(ii) Otherwise, consider the coloring c00 output by AN arrow Color . Then, using
Lemma 5, we have that
0
)) + P (c0 (Sn0 ))
P (c0 (J ))
P (c0 (Sw
=
≤ max
0
0
3P (c (Sw ))
0<x≤β
P (c00 (J ))
+ P (c0 (Sn0 ))
4
3x
4
4
1
=
4
−
β
+1−x
Now, applying Lemma 4, and the rounding in Step 6 of AN arrow Color with
ε̂, we have that P (c0 (J )) ≥ (1 − 3ε̂)OP T fsap (J ) = (1 − ε)OP T fsap (J ).
The theorem follows by taking β = 45 .
5
Uniform fsap Instances
We now consider uniform instances of fsap, in which rmax (i) = Max, for some
1 ≤ Max ≤ W , and pi = 1, for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Let k = dW/Maxe.
We first prove that if k = W/Max (i.e., W is an integral multiple of Max)
then fsap can be solved optimally by finding a maximum k-colorable subgraph
in G, and assigning to each interval in this subgraph Max contiguous colors. In
contrast to this case if k > W/Max, then we show that fsap is NP-Hard, and
give a polynomial approximation scheme to solve such instances.
Lemma 6 An fsap instance where for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n, rmax (i) = Max, and W is
multiple of Max can be solved exactly in polynomial time.
11
Proof. Consider an fbap instance where for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n, rmax (i) = Max, and
W is multiple of Max. We claim that there exists an optimal solution to this
fbap instance in which each job gets either 0 or Max colors. To see that consider
the behavior of the algorithm Paging fba on such an instance, i.e., in which
rmin (i) = 0 and rmax (i) = Max. Note that when we start the algorithm |AVAIL|
is a multiple of Max and thus when the first (left) endpoint s1 is considered the
job J1 is allocated Max colors and |AVAIL| remains a multiple of Max. Assume
inductively that as the endpoints are scanned all the jobs that were allocated
colors up to this endpoint were allocated Max colors and that |AVAIL| is a multiple of Max. If the current scanned endpoint is a right endpoint ei then by the
induction hypothesis either 0 or Max colors are added to AVAIL and nothing else is
changed. Suppose that the scanned endpoint is a left endpoint si . If |AVAIL| > 0
then Max colors from AVAIL are allocated to Ji . Otherwise, Ji may be allocated
colors that were previously allocated to another job J` , for ` < i. However, in
this case because rmin (`) = 0 all the Max colors allocated to J` will be moved to
Ji , and the hypothesis still holds.
The optimal way to assign either 0 or Max colors to each job is given by
computing the maximum k = (W/Max)-colorable subgraph of G and assigning
Max colors to each interval in the maximum k-colorable subgraph. Since the
assignment of these colors can be done contiguously it follows that this is also
the optimal solution to the respective fsap instance.
In the Appendix, we give a proof of hardness in case k > W/Max.
Theorem 7. fsap is strongly NP-hard even if for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n rmax (i) = 3,
and W is not divisible by 3.
5.1
An Approximation Scheme
We now describe a PTAS for uniform istances of fsap. Fix ε > 0, and let J be a
uniform input for fsap. Denote by OP Tfsap (J ) the value of an optimal solution
for instance J of fsap.
The scheme handles separately two subclasses of inputs, depending on the
value of Max. First, we consider the case where Max is large relative to W , or
more precisely k = dW/Maxe ≤ 1/ε. We prove in the next lemma that in this
case if we partition the colors into a constant number of contiguous strips and
limit our solution to always assigning all the colors in the same strip to the same
job, we can find a solution that is at least (1 − ε)OP Tfsap (J ). The size of each
strip (except possibly the last one) is bεMax/4c ≥ 1. Since the number of strips is
O(1/ε2 ), we can find an approximation in this case using dynamic programming
as shown in [25].
Lemma 8 Any optimal solution for a uniform input J for fsap where k =
dW/Maxe ≤ 1/ε can be converted to a solution where each interval is assigned a
number of colors that is an integral number of strips, and the total profit is at
least (1 − ε)OP Tfsap (J ).
12
Proof. W.l.o.g., we may assume that bεMax/4c ≥ 1, else we have that W is a
constant, and we can solve fsap optimally in polynomial time (see [25]). Given
an optimal solution for a uniform input J , let S be the subset of intervals Ji
for which |c(Ji )| > 0, and let GS be the support graph for S (i.e., the subgraph
of the original interval graph induced by the intervals in S). Using the above
4W
e strips. Denote by Cj
partition of the colors to strips, we have 1 ≤ N ≤ d εMax
the subset of colors of strip j. We obtain the strip structure for the solution
as follows. Let Sj ⊆ S be the subset of intervals with colors in strip j, i.e.,
Sj = {Ji |c(Ji )∩Cj 6= ∅}. Initialize for all Ji ∈ S, c0 (Ji ) = ∅. (i) For all 1 ≤ j ≤ N ,
find in GS a maximum independent set, Ij of intervals Ji ∈ Sj . For any Ji ∈ Ij ,
assign to Ji all colors in Cj , i.e., c0 (Ji ) = c0 (Ji ) ∪ Cj . (ii) For any Ji ∈ S, if
|c0 (Ji )| > Max then omit from the coloring of Ji a consecutive subset of strips,
starting from the highest 1 ≤ j ≤ N , such that Cj ⊆ c0 (Ji ), until for the first
time |c0 (Ji )| ≤ Max.
We show below that the above strip coloring for S is feasible, and that the
total profit from the strip coloring is at least (1 − ε)OP T fsap (J). To show feasibility, note that if Ji ∈ Sj and Ji ∈ Sj+2 then because the coloring is contiguous
Ji is allocated all the colors in Sj+1 , and thus any maximum independent set
Ij+1 will contain Ji since it has no conflicts with other jobs in Sj+1 . It follows that if a job Ji is allocated colors in more than two consecutive strips, i.e.,
Ji ∈ Sj ∩ Sj+1 ∩ · · · ∩ Sj+` , for ` > 1, then Ji ∈ Ij+1 ∩ · · · ∩ Ij+`−1 . Thus, each
interval Ji ∈ S will be assigned in step (i) a consecutive set of strips. Hence c0
is a contiguous coloring. In addition, after step (ii), for all Ji ∈ S we have that
|c0 (Ji )| ≤ Max.
Now, consider the profit of the strip coloring. We note that after step (i),
the total profit of c0 is at least OP T fsap (J). This is because for each strip j,
|Cj | · |Ij | is an upper bound on the profit that can be obtained from this strip.
We show that the harm of reducing the number of colors in step (ii) is small.
We distinguish between two type of intervals in S.
(a) Intervals Ji for which |c(Ji )| ≥ (1−ε/2)Max. Since coloring c is valid it follows
that |c0 (Ji )| is reduced in step (ii) only if before this step |c0 (Ji )| > |c(Ji )|.
Consider all the strips that contain colors assigned to Ji in the original
coloring c. Note that in all such strips except at most two no colors are
assigned to any interval that intersects Ji . Thus |c0 (Ji )| is reduced in step
(ii) by at most 2b εMax
4 c ≤ (ε/2)Max. Since |c(Ji )| ≥ (1 − ε/2)Max, we have
that after step (ii), |c0 (Ji )| ≥ |c(Ji )| − (ε/2)Max ≥ (1 − ε)Max.
(b) For any interval Ji for which |c(Ji )| < (1 − ε/2)Max, since after step (i)
0
|c0 (Ji )| ≤ |c(Ji )| + 2b εMax
4 c, we have that |c (Ji )| ≤ Max. Thus, no colors are
omitted from Ji in step (ii).
From (a) and (b), we have that the total profit from the strip coloring satisfies
OP T 0 fsap (J ) ≥ (1 − ε)OP T fsap (J ).
Now, consider the case where Max is small, i.e., k = dW/Maxe > 1/ε. In this
case we consider just (k − 1)Max consecutive colors and ignore the remainder up
to εW colors. Recall that when the number of colors is a multiple of Max we can
13
find an optimal solution. Let OP Tfsap(W ) (J ) denote the value of an optimal solution for instance J of fsap with W colors, and recall that k = dW/Maxe.
Since (k − 1)Max < W < kMax, OP Tfsap((k−1)Max) (J ) < OP Tfsap(W ) (J ) <
OP Tfsap(kMax) (J ). The value of OP Tfsap((k−1)Max) is Max times the size of the
max (k − 1)-colorable subgraph of G, and the value of OP Tfsap(kMax) is Max times
the size of the max k-colorable subgraph of G. Clearly, the ratio of the sizes
of these subgraphs and thus the ratio of the two optimal values is bounded by
1−1/k > 1−ε. It follows that OP Tfsap((k−1)Max) (J ) ≥ (1−ε)OP Tfsap(kMax) (J ) >
(1 − ε)OP Tfsap(W ) (J ). Combining the results, we have
Theorem 9. The above algorithm is a PTAS for uniform fsap instances.
Acknowledgments: We thank Magnús Halldórsson and Viswanath Nagarajan
for valuable discussions.
References
1. S. Albers, S. Arora, and S. Khanna. Page replacement for general caching problems.
In SODA, pages 31–40, 1999.
2. A. Anagnostopoulos, F. Grandoni, S. Leonardi, and A. Wiese. A mazing 2+
approximation for unsplittable flow on a path. In SODA, pages 26–41, 2014.
3. A. Bar-Noy, R. Bar-Yehuda, A. Freund, J. Naor, and B. Schieber. A unified approach to approximating resource allocation and scheduling. JACM, 48(5):735–744,
2000.
4. R. Bar-Yehuda, M. Beder, Y. Cohen, and D. Rawitz. Resource allocation in
bounded degree trees. Algorithmica, 54(1):89–106, 2009.
5. R. Bar-Yehuda, M. Beder, and D. Rawitz. A constant factor approximation algorithm for the storage allocation problem: extended abstract. In SPAA, pages
204–213, 2013.
6. J. Batra, N. Garg, A. Kumar, T. Mömke, and A. Wiese. New approximation
schemes for unsplittable flow on a path. In SODA, pages 47–58, 2015.
7. L. A. Belady. A study of replacement algorithms for virtual-storage computer.
IBM Systems Journal, 5(2):78–101, 1966.
8. G. Călinescu, A. Chakrabarti, H. J. Karloff, and Y. Rabani. An improved approximation algorithm for resource allocation. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 7(4),
2011.
9. V. T. Chakaravarthy, A. R. Choudhury, S. Gupta, S. Roy, and Y. Sabharwal.
Improved algorithms for resource allocation under varying capacity. In ESA, pages
222–234, 2014.
10. C. Chekuri, M. Mydlarz, and F. B. Shepherd. Multicommodity demand flow in a
tree and packing integer programs. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 3(3), 2007.
11. B. Chen, R. Hassin, and M. Tzur. Allocation of bandwidth and storage. IIE
Transactions, 34(5):501–507, 2002.
12. M. Chrobak, G. J. Woeginger, K. Makino, and H. Xu. Caching is hard - even in
the fault model. Algorithmica, 63(4):781–794, 2012.
13. O. Gerstel. Flexible use of spectrum and photonic grooming. In Photonics in
Switching, 2010.
14. N. Jain, I. Menache, J. Naor, and J. Yaniv. A truthful mechanism for value-based
scheduling in cloud computing. In SAGT, pages 178–189, 2011.
14
15. M. Jinno, H. Takara, B. Kozicki, Y. Tsukishima, Y. Sone, and S. Matsuoka.
Spectrum-efficient and scalable elastic optical path network: architecture, benefits, and enabling technologies. Comm. Mag., 47:66–73, 2009.
16. R. M. Karp. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In Proc. Complexity of
Computer Computations, pages 85–103, 1972.
17. A. W. Kolen, J. K. Lenstra, C. H. Papadimitriou, and F. C. Spieksma. Interval
scheduling: A survey. Naval Research Logistics, 54(5):530–543, 2007.
18. S. Leonardi, A. Marchetti-Spaccamela, and A. Vitaletti. Approximation algorithms
for bandwidth and storage allocation problems under real time constraints. In
FSTTCS, pages 409–420, 2000.
19. V. Liberatore. Uniform multipaging reduces to paging. Inf. Process. Lett., 67(1):9–
12, 1998.
20. M. Mao and M. Humphrey. Auto-scaling to minimize cost and meet application
deadlines in cloud workflows. In SC, 2011.
21. T. Mömke and A. Wiese. A (2+)-approximation algorithm for the storage allocation problem. In ICALP, pages 973–984, 2015.
22. R. Ramaswami, K. N. Sivarajan, and G. H. Sasaki. Optical Networks: A Practical
Perspective. Morgan Kaufmann Publisher Inc., San Francisco, 2009.
23. H. Shachnai, A. Voloshin, and S. Zaks. Flexible bandwidth assignment with application to optical networks. In MFCS, 2014.
24. H. Shachnai, A. Voloshin, and S. Zaks. Optimizing bandwidth allocation in flexgrid optical networks with application to scheduling. In IPDPS, 2014.
25. M. Shalom, P. Wong, and S. Zaks. Profit maximization in flex-grid all-optical
networks. In SIROCCO, 2013.
A
Algorithm Paging fba
Algorithm 2 gives the pseudocode of Paging fba.
B
Hardness of fsap for Uniform Instances
Proof of Theorem 7: The reduction is from of the 3-Exact-Cover (3XC) problem defined as follows. Given a universal set U = {e1 , . . . , e3n } and a collection
S = {S1 , . . . , Sm } of 3 element subsets of U , is there a sub-collection S 0 ⊆ S such
that each element of U occurs in exactly one member of S 0 . Note that |S 0 | = n,
if such exists. Recall that Karp showed in his seminal paper [16] that 3XC is
NP-Complete.
To simplify the presentation, we first assume that the intervals have different
profits per allocated unit. For the reduction, we use several sets of intervals. One
such set is shown in Fig. 2. It consists of 16 intervals whose lengths and relative
positions are given in the figure. Assume that the profit of each of the intervals
9, . . . , 16 is higher than the sum of the profits of intervals 1, . . . , 8, and that the
profit of each of the intervals 2 to 7 is higher than the profit of intervals 1 and 8.
Suppose that we are given two “banks” of contiguous colors to allocate to this
set of intervals: one bank consists of four contiguous colors and one consists of
three contiguous colors. Given that rmax (i) = 3, our first priority is to allocate
three colors to each interval in [9..16]. Assuming that three colors are indeed
15
Algorithm 2 Paging fba(J , r̄min , r̄max , W )
1: SOL = 0.
2: AVAIL = [1..W ].
3: W.l.o.g. assume that all endpoints are distinct. Sort the left endpoints of the
intervals in J in non-decreasing order. Let L denote the sorted list.
4: while not end-of-list do
5:
Consider the next endpoint L.
6:
if the endpoint is si , the left endpoint of Ji , then
7:
SOL+ = rmin (i).
8:
Ai = ∅.
9:
if |AVAIL| > rmin (i) then
10:
Move rmin (i) colors from AVAIL to Ai .
11:
else
12:
Ai = AVAIL
13:
AVAIL = ∅.
14:
while |Ai | < rmin (i) do
15:
Among all intervals such that sk < si and |Ak | > rmin (k), let Jk
be the interval with maximum right endpoint ek .
16:
Move min{|Ak | − rmin (k), rmin (i) − |Ai |} colors from Ak to Ai .
17:
end while
18:
end if
19:
Move min{|AVAIL|, rmax (i) − rmin (i)} colors from AVAIL to Ai .
20:
SOL+ = min{|AVAIL|, rmax (i) − rmin (i)}.
21:
Let Ji = {Jk ∈ J |sk < si ∧ ek > ei ∧ |Ak | > rmin (k)}.
22:
while |Ai | < rmax (i) ∧ |Ji | > 0 do
23:
Let Jk be the interval with the maximum right endpoint in Ji .
24:
Move min{|Ak | − rmin (k), rmax (i) − |Ai |} colors from Ak to Ai
25:
end while
26:
else
27:
{The endpoint is ei , the right endpoint of Ji }
28:
AVAIL = AVAIL ∪ Ai
29:
end if
30: end while
31: Return SOL and the sets A1 , . . . An of colors assigned to the jobs in J .
allocated to each interval in [9..16], note that any other interval can be allocated
at most one color. This is since any other interval intersects two intervals from
[9..16] at a point.
We say that two intervals from [1..8] conflict if both cannot be allocated
colors simultaneously. Note that two such intervals conflict if both intersect two
intervals from [9..16] at the same time point because only 7 colors are available.
Define the conflict graph to be a graph over the vertices [1..8], where two vertices
are connected if the respective intervals conflict. It is easy to see that the conflict
graph is the path 1 – 5 – 2 – 6 – 3 – 7 – 4 – 8. Since the profit of intervals [2..7]
16
2
4
1
3
7
5
6
9
8
10
11
13
12
14
1
2
3
4
5
15
6
7
9
8
16
10
11
12
13
14
15
Fig. 2: The “two-choice” set of intervals
is higher than the profit of intervals 1 and 8, the best strategy is to allocate one
color to three of the intervals in [2..7] and one color to either interval 1 or 8.
The only two possibilities for allocating the two banks of colors in such a way
are illustrated in Fig. 3. Because of this property, we call this set of intervals
a “two-choice” gadget. Note that, in the first option, the bank of 3 colors is
unassigned at times: 5, 9 and 13, while in the second option, it is unassigned at
times 3, 7 and 11.
1
3
10
9
12
11
2
9
4
11
10
12
8
6
15
13
13
15
14
16
5
Option 1
14
7
16
Option 2
Fig. 3: The set of intervals
We need to define also a pair of intervals called an “overlapping” pair of
intervals, illustrated in Fig. 4. Note that to be able to allocate 3 colors to both
intervals, we need one bank of 3 contiguous colors at time interval [t1 , t2 + 1)
and another at time interval [t2 , t3 ); that is, we need both banks at time interval
[t2 , t2 + 1).
17
t2
t3
t1
Fig. 4: Overlapping intervals
We now describe the reduction from the 3XC problem. For each set Si ∈ S,
associate a “two-choice” gadget. The “two choices” correspond to the decision
whether to include Si in the cover or not. For each element e ∈ U , and for each
set Si such that e ∈ Si , we associate a pair of overlapping intervals, where the
overlap is in one of the times in which the “two choice” gadget corresponding
to set Si has an unassigned bank of 3 colors. In addition, we define some extra
intervals as detailed below.
Given a 3XC problem instance, set W = 9m+7 and rmax = 3 for all intervals.
Let P = 8n + 45m. In the reduction, we have 5 groups of intervals defined as
follows.
(i) Left border: 3m + 3 intervals L1 , . . . , L3m+3 each of profit P 2 . For i ∈ [1..3n],
Li = [0, i), for i ∈ [3n + 1..3m], Li = [0, 4n), and for i ∈ [3m + 1..3m + 3],
Li = [0, 4n + 15m).
(ii) Right border: 3m+3 intervals R1 , . . . R3m+3 each of profit P 2 . For i ∈ [1..3n],
Ri = [5n + 45m + i, 8n + 45m + 1), for i ∈ [3n + 1..3m], Ri = [4n + 45m, 8n +
45m + 1), and for i ∈ [3m + 1..3m + 3], Ri = [4n + 30m, 8n + 45m + 1).
(iii) “two choice” gadgets: m copies of the “two choice” gadget, one for each set
Si ∈ S. The gadget associated with set Si starts at time 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1)
and its length is 15 time units. The profit of intervals 1 and 8 in each copy
is 1, the profit of intervals 2 to 7 is 2, and the profit of intervals 9 to 16 is
P 2.
(iv) element overlapping pairs: 3m overlapping pairs of intervals, one per occurrence of an element in a set. For each Si ∈ S, let Si = {ea , eb , ec },
where {a, b, c} ⊆ [1..3n]. The respective three overlapping pairs are (1)
[a, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 3) and [4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 2, 5n + 45m + a), (2)
[b, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 7) and [4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 6, 5n + 45m + b), and
(3) [c, 4n+15m+15(i−1)+ 11) and [4n+15m+15(i−1)+10, 5n+45m+c).
The profit of each such interval is its length. Note that the profit of any pair
of overlapping intervals is 5n + 45m + 1.
(v) “filler” overlapping pairs: 3m overlapping pairs, three per set. For each Si ∈
S, the respective three overlapping pairs are (1) [4n, 4n+15m+15(i−1)+5)
and [4n+15m+15(i−1)+4, 4n+45m), (2) [4n, 4n+15m+15(i−1)+9) and
[4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 8, 4n + 45m), and (3) [4n, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 13)
and [4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 12, 4n + 45m). The profit of each such interval is
its length. Note that the profit of any pair of overlapping intervals is 45m+1.
18
Lemma 10 The 3XC instance has an exact cover if and only if the associated
fsap instance has profit (18m + 14 + 24m)P 2 + 7m + 9n(5n + 45m + 1) + (9m −
9n)(45m + 1) = (42m + 14)P 2 + 405m2 + 45n2 + 16m.
Proof. Assume that the 3XC instance has an exact cover. We show an assignment
of the intervals in the fsap instance that achieves the desired profit. First, assign
color 1 to L3m+2 and R3m+2 and colors 2, 3, 4 to L3m+3 and R3m+3 . Also assign
colors 5, 6, 7 to L3m+1 and colors 9m+5, 9m+6, 9m+7 to R3m+1 . Now, consider
Si , for i ∈ [1..m]. Assume that 0 ≤ k < i sets Sj , for j < i are in the cover. (See
also Fig. 5.)
1
3
10
9
12
11
2
OL3i+1
OL3i+2
14
9
OLa
OR3i+2
15
OL3i+3
15
13
14
5
4
OR3i+1
13
8
6
OR3i+3
OLb
16
OLc
16
7
ORa
10
ORb
11
ORc
12
(OL3i+1 ,OR3i+1) (OL3i+2 ,OR3i+2) and (OL3i+3 ,OR3i+3) are
(OLa ,ORa) (OLb ,ORb) and (OLc ,ORc) are element
“filler”overlapping pairs
overlapping pairs of elements ea, eb, ec
Fig. 5: Assigning intervals related to Si
If Si is not in the cover choose the first option for the “two choice” gadget
associated with Si . Namely, assign colors [1..4] to intervals [1..4] and [9..12] in
the gadget, and for j ∈ [13..16] assign colors 9i + 3j − 43, 9i + 3j − 42, 9i + 3j − 41
to interval j. Also, assign colors 9i−4, 9i−3, 9i−2 to R3(n+i−k)−2 ; for j ∈ {2, 3},
assign colors 9i+3j−7, 9i+3j−6, 9i+3j−5 to L3(n+i−k)+j−4 and R3(n+i−k)+j−3 ,
and assign colors 9i+5, 9i+6, 9i+7 to L3(n+i−k) . Finally, assign 3 colors to the 3
“filler” overlapping pairs corresponding to Si as follows: colors 9i−4, 9i−3, 9i−2
to interval [4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 4, 4n + 45m), colors 9i − 1, 9i, 9i + 1 to
intervals [4n, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 5) and [4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 8, 4n +
45m), colors 9i + 2, 9i + 3, 9i + 4 to intervals [4n, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 9) and
19
[4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 12, 4n + 45m), and colors 9i + 5, 9i + 6, 9i + 7 to interval
[4n, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 13).
Suppose that Si is in the cover. Let Si = {ea , eb , ec }, where {a, b, c} ⊆ [1..3n].
Choose the second option for the “two choice” gadget associated with Si . Namely,
assign colors [1..4] to intervals [5..8] and [13..16] in the gadget, and for j ∈ [9..12]
assign colors 9i + 3j − 31, 9i + 3j − 30, 9i + 3j − 29 to interval j. The respective
element overlapping pairs and the border intervals are assigned colors as follows:
colors 9i−4, 9i−3, 9i−2 to [4n+15m+15(i−1)+2, 5n+45m+a) and Ra , colors
9i − 1, 9i, 9i + 1 to La , [a, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 3), [4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 6, 5n +
45m + b) and Rb , colors 9i + 2, 9i + 3, 9i + 4 to Lb , [b, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 7),
[4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 10, 5n + 45m + c) and Rc , and colors 9i + 5, 9i + 6, 9i + 7
to Lc and [c, 4n + 15m + 15(i − 1) + 11).
Note that the assignment is valid, that is, no two overlapping intervals are
assigned the same color. To calculate the total profit of the assignment note that
L3m+1 , L3m+3 , R3m+1 and R3m+3 are each assigned 3 colors and L3m+2 , R3m+2
are assigned a single color. This contributes 14P 2 to the profit. Also, intervals
[9..16] in all the “two choice” gadgets are assigned 3 colors, and either intervals
[1..4] or [5..8] are assigned a single color. This contributes 24mP 2 + 7m to the
profit. Since we start from a cover, all the element overlapping pairs as well as
the corresponding left and right border intervals are assigned 3 colors each. This
contributes 3 · 6nP 2 + 3 · 3n(5n + 45m + 1) to the profit. Since the cover is exact,
3m − 3n “filler” overlapping pairs as well as the corresponding left and right
border intervals are assigned 3 colors each. This contributes 3(6m − 6n)P 2 +
3(3m − 3n)(45m + 1) to the profit. Overall, the profit is (42m + 14)P 2 + 405m2 +
45n2 + 16m.
We now prove the other direction. Suppose that we find an assignment of
colors to intervals with total profit (42m + 14)P 2 + 405m2 + 45n2 + 16m. The
only way to get total profit of at least (42m + 14)P 2 is by assigning 3 colors to
all intervals with P 2 profit per allocated unit in the “two choice” gadgets, and
in addition, by assigning 3 colors to all but one left (and right) border intervals,
and by assigning the 1 remaining color to the remaining left (and right) border
interval.
Consider the (element and “filler”) overlapping pairs. At most 3m left (and
right) intervals out of these overlapping pairs can be assigned 3 colors each, since
any additional assignment would conflict with the assignment of colors to the
border intervals. Out of these 3m left and right intervals, at most 3n left (and
right) intervals can be element overlapping intervals.
Since all intervals with P 2 profit per allocated unit in the “two choice” gadgets are assigned 3 colors, there are 3m remaining 3 color blocks throughout the
interval [4n + 15m, 4n + 30m) and at most one more block of 3 colors is available
in each of the 6m time units when some of the intervals with P 2 profit per allocated unit in the “two choice” gadgets are not assigned any color (see Fig. 3).
The maximum profit that can be attained by assigning these colors to the unassigned intervals in the “two choice” gadgets is at most 3 · (2 · 6 + 2)m = 42m.
Thus the only way to achieve the 405m2 term in the profit (for large enough
20
m) is by actually assigning 3 colors to 3m left and 3m right intervals out of the
overlapping pairs.
Consider the 3m left intervals of the overlapping pairs that are assigned 3
colors in increasing length order and the right intervals of the overlapping pairs
that are assigned 3 colors in decreasing length order. Denote these two sequences
L
R
by O1L , . . . , O3m
and O1R , . . . , O3m
.
Claim 1 For i ∈ [1..3m], if OiL and OiR overlap, they cannot overlap by more
than one time unit.
Proof. Suppose the claim does not hold, and let i be the minimum index for
which OiL and OiR overlap by more than one time unit. However, in this case
OiL and OiR must overlap in at least one time unit t when the intervals with P 2
profit per allocated unit in the “two choice” gadgets are assigned two blocks of 3
R
colors. Since OiR contains time t, t is contained also in O1R , . . . , Oi−1
. Similarly,
L
L
L
since Oi contains time t, t is contained also in Oi+1 , . . . , O3m . But this implies
that 3m + 1 intervals out of the overlapping pairs and 2 intervals from the “two
choice” gadget are each assigned 3 colors. This is impossible, since there are only
9m + 7 colors.
From the discussion above, it follows that if OiL and OiR overlap they must be
an overlapping pair. The maximum profit that can be attained from the intervals
in the “two choice” gadgets that do not have P 2 profit per allocated unit is 14m.
Thus, to achieve the additional 405m2 + 45n2 terms in the profit, we must have
that for all i ∈ [1..3m], intervals OiL and OiR are an overlapping pair, and 3n
out of these overlapping pairs are element overlapping pairs. This will contribute
405m2 + 45n2 + 9m to the profit. The extra 7m profit needs to be attained by
assigning colors to the intervals in the “two choice” gadgets that do not have
P 2 profit per allocated unit. It follows that each “two choice” gadget needs to
be colored using one of the two options described above and exactly n of them
have to be colored using the second option. These n gadgets correspond to the
exact cover.
Finally, we note how the reduction can be modified to include only intervals
of identical profit per allocated unit. The idea is to “slice” each interval in the
original reduction to smaller intervals whose number is the profit per allocated
unit of the original interval. When doing so, we need to ensure that it is not beneficial to move from a “slice” of one interval to a “slice” of another interval. This
is done by assigning different displacements to the slices in different intervals,
so that whenever we attempt to gain from a move from a “slice” of one interval
to a “slice” of another interval, we lose at least one slice due to the different
displacements. Thus, the same set of colors will be used for all slices associated
with the original interval. This completes the proof of the theorem.
C
Algorithm AN arrow
The pseudocode of AN arrow
Color
Color
is given in Algorithm 3.
21
Algorithm 3 AN arrow Color (J , r̄max , p̄, W, ε, P ))
1: Solve the linear program LP fba
2: Round the solution to obtain a (non-contiguous) coloring c.
3: Find a circular contiguous coloring c0 of the same total profit as c. Such a
coloring exists since the input graph is proper, and is obtained by scanning
the intervals from left to right and assigning the colors in a fixed circular
order.
4: Let S 0 be the set of colored intervals in c0 .
0
5: Let Sw
⊆ S 0 be the subset of intervals Ji ∈ S 0 for which |c0 (Ji )| ≥ εW , and
0
0
let Sn = S 0 \ Sw
.
0
6: for any Ji ∈ Sw , round down |c0 (Ji )| to the nearest integral multiple of ε2 W ,
and eliminate the corresponding amount of colors in c0 (Ji ), such the first
color assigned to Ji is fi = br · ε2 W c, for some integer r ≥ 0.
7: for ` = br · ε2 W c, r = 0, 1, . . . , d ε12 e do
0
0
|{`, [` mod b(1 − ε)W c] + 1} ⊆ c0 (Ji )}
(`) = {Ji ∈ Sw
8:
Let Sw
0
9:
Let P (Sw (`)) = 0
0
(`) do
10:
for Ji ∈ Sw
11:
Suppose that c0 (Ji ) = {fi , [fi mod b(1 − ε)W c] + 1, . . . , ti },
for some 1 ≤ fi , ti ≤ b(1 − ε)W c.
12:
Partition the set of |c0 (Ji )| colors assigned to Ji into two contiguous
blocks:
Block 1 (i) = {fi , . . . , `}, and Block 2 (i) = {` mod b(1 − ε)W c +
1, . . . , ti }.
0
13:
Let P (Sw
(`))+ = pi · min{|Block 1 (i)|, |Block 2 (i)|}
14:
end for
15: end for
0
(`)).
16: Let `good = argmin1≤`≤b(1−ε)W c P (Sw
0
17: for Ji ∈ Sw (`good ) do
18:
Assign to Ji the larger of Block 1 (i) and Block 2 (i).
19: end for
20: Renumber the first b(1 − ε)W c colors starting at `good mod b(1 − ε)W c + 1.
21: Let Sn0 (`good ) = {Ji ∈ Sn0 |{`good , [`good mod b(1 − ε)W c] + 1} ⊆ c0 (Ji )}
22: for Ji ∈ Sn0 (`good ) do
23:
Assign to Ji |c0 (Ji )| contiguous colors in the set {b(1 − ε)W c + 1, . . . , W }.
24: end for
25: Return c00 the resulting coloring of S 0 .
D
A
2k
-approximation
2k−1
Algorithm for Uniform fsap
We describe below Algorithm AM axSmall for uniform fsap instances. It yields soW
lutions that are close to the optimal as k = d Max
e gets large. Initially, AM axSmall
solves optimally fbap on the input graph G. Let G0 be the support graph for
this solution. AM axSmall proceeds by generating a feasible solution for fsap as
22
follows. Consider the set of intervals Ji ∈ G0 for which |c(Ji )| = Max. Denote
the support subgraph of this set of intervals G2 . Observe that the graph G2 is
(k − 1)-colorable, since there is no clique of size k in G2 (as it would require
kMax > W colors). Consequently, each interval in G2 can be assigned a set of
Max contiguous colors, using a total of (k − 1)Max colors. AM axSmall then finds a
maximum independent set of intervals in the remaining subgraph G1 = G0 \ G2 ,
and colors contiguously each interval in this set using the remaining W mod Max
colors (see the pseudocode in Algorithm 4).
Algorithm 4 AM axSmall (J , Max, W )
1: Find an optimal solution for fbap on G, the interval graph of J , using
Algorithm Paging fba.
2: Let S ⊆ J be the solution set of intervals, and G0 ⊆ G the support graph of
S.
3: Let G2 ⊆ G0 the subgraph induced by the intervals Ji for which |c(Ji )| = Max.
4: Let G1 ⊆ G0 be the subgraph induced by the rest of the intervals, i.e.,
intervals Ji for which |c(Ji )| < Max.
5: Scan the intervals Ji in G2 from left to right and color contiguously each
6:
7:
8:
9:
interval with the lowest available Max colors.
Let r = W mod Max.
Let I be a maximum independent set in G1 .
Color each interval in I contiguously with r colors.
Return the coloring of the intervals in G1 ∪ G2 .
Theorem 11. For any uniform instance of fsap, AM axSmall yields an optimal
2k
solution for fsap, if k ∈ {1, 2}, and a 2k−1
-approximation for any k ≥ 3.
The proof of Theorem 11 uses the next lemma. Recall that G1 ⊆ G0 is the
subgraph induced by the intervals Ji for which |c(Ji )| < Max.
Lemma 12 The subgraph G1 ⊆ G0 is proper and 2-colorable.
Proof. We first note that if G1 is not proper, then there exist two intervals, Ji and
Jj , such that Jj is properly contained in Ji . By the way Paging fba proceeds,
when it colors Jj , some colors that were assigned to Ji should be assigned to
Jj , until either |c(Jj )| = Max, or |c(Ji )| = 0. Since none of the two occurs - a
contradiction.
We now show that G1 is 2-colorable. Throughout the proof, we assume that
there are n1 intervals in G1 sorted by their starting points, and numbered
1, 2, . . . P
, n1 , i.e., s1 < s2 , < · · · < sn1 . For any t ∈ [s1 , en1 ), say that t is
tight if {J` ∈J :t∈J` } |c(J` )| = W . Let T denote the set of tight time points. To
keep a discrete set of such points, we consider only tight points t which are also
the start-times of intervals, i.e., t = si for some 1 ≤ i ≤ n. We note that every
23
interval Ji ∈ G1 contains at least one tight time point (otherwise, Paging fba
would assign more colors to Ji ). We complete the proof using the next claim.
Claim 2 Every time point t ∈ T is contained in exactly one interval Ji ∈ G1 .
We now show that Claim 2 implies that G1 is 2-colorable. Assume that there
exists in G1 a clique of at least 3 intervals. Let Ja , Jb , Jc be three ordered intervals
in this clique. We note that there is no t ∈ Jb that is not contained in either Ja
or Jc . However, Jb must contain a tight time point. Contradiction to Claim 2.
Proof of Claim 2: First, note that since W is not a multiple of Max every
tight time point has to be contained in at least one interval Ji ∈ G1 . We prove
that it cannot be contained in more than one such interval by induction. Let t1
be the earliest time point in T . Since each Ji ∈ G1 contains a tight time point,
t1 ∈ J1 . If t1 < s2 then clearly the claim holds for t1 . Suppose that t1 ≥ s2 . In
this case, since there is at least one available color in [s1 , s2 ), and since e2 > e1 ,
Algorithm Paging fba would assign at least one additional color to J1 rather
than to J2 . A contradiction.
For the inductive step, let i > 1, and consider ti ∈ T . Assume that the claim
holds for ti−1 ∈ T , and let ti−1 ∈ J` . Since ti−1 is not contained in any other
interval in G1 , and since it is tight, we must have |c(J` )| = W mod Max. To obtain
a contradiction assume that ti is contained in more than one interval in G1 . At
least one of these intervals must be J`+1 (since ti > e`−1 ). If ti is not contained in
J` then clearly, by our assumption, ti must also be contained in J`+2 . However,
even if ti ∈ J` , since |c(J` )| = W mod Max, in order for ti to be tight, it must be
contained also in J`+2 . In this case, since there is at least one available color in
[s`+1 , s`+2 ), and since e`+2 > e`+1 , Algorithm Paging fba would assign at least
one additional color to J`+1 , rather than to J`+2 . A contradiction.
We are ready to show the performance ratio of Algorithm AM axSmall .
Proof of Theorem 11: Given the graphs G0 and G1 , G2 , as defined in Steps
4, and 3 of AM axSmall , respectively. Let OP T fsap (G) and A(G) be the value of
an optimal solution and the solution output by AM axSmall , respectively, for an
input graph G. Clearly, OP T fsap (G) ≤ OP T fba (G).
Case 1: k < 3. Since in this case G1 is an independent set, A(G) = OP T fba (G),
and thus A(G) = OP T fsap (G).
Case 2: k ≥ 3. Since in this case G1 is 2-colorable, A(G) ≥ OP T fba (G) − 21 ·
2k
(W mod Max) · |G1 |. Hence, to get the approximation ratio 2k−1
, we need to
1
show that (W mod Max) · |G1 | ≤ k OP T fba (G). Let λMax = W mod Max. Note
that 0 < λ < 1. In fact, we prove a slightly better bound, as we show that
(W mod Max) · |G1 |
λ
1
≤
< .
OP T fba (G)
k−1+λ
k
(3)
2k
This implies the approximation ratio 2k−2+2λ
2k−2+λ < 2k−1 . To obtain a contradiction,
assume that inequality (3) does not hold. Recall that OP T fba (G) = (W mod
24
Max) · |G1 | + Max · |G2 |, and that |G2 | = |G0 | − |G1 |. We get
(W mod Max) · |G1 |
λMax|G1 |
=
0
OP T fba (G)
Max|G | − Max(1 − λ)|G1 |
=
|G0 |
λ|G1 |
λ
>
.
− (1 − λ)|G1 |
k−1+λ
This implies k|G1 | > |G0 |, and thus
OP T fba (G) = λMax|G1 | + Max(|G0 | − |G1 |) = Max|G0 | − (1 − λ)Max|G1 |
k−1+λ
1
· Max|G0 |.
< (1 − (1 − λ))Max|G0 | =
k
k
Note than G0 , the support graph of the solution obtained by Paging fba,
is k-colorable, since it cannot contain any clique of size k + 1. Indeed, such
a clique can have at most 2 intervals from G1 , and at least k − 1 intervals
from G2 , and thus requires more than W colors (since Algorithm Paging fba
assigns W mod Max colors to each interval in G1 ). We can use the k coloring to
obtain a solution of the fbap instance, by assigning Max colors to intervals in the
k − 1 largest color classes, and W mod Max to the remaining color class. Thus,
k−1+λ
0
OP T fba (G) ≥ k1 · λMax|G0 | + k−1
· Max|G0 |. A contradiction.
k · Max|G | =
k
25
| 8cs.DS
|
The pure braid groups and their relatives
arXiv:1602.05291v2 [math.GR] 29 May 2016
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
Abstract In this mostly survey paper, we investigate the resonance varieties, the
lower central series ranks, and the Chen ranks, as well as the residual and formality
properties of several families of braid-like groups: the pure braid groups Pn , the
welded pure braid groups wPn , the virtual pure braid groups vPn , as well as their
‘upper’ variants, wPn+ and vPn+ . We also discuss several natural homomorphisms
between these groups, and various ways to distinguish among the pure braid groups
and their relatives.
Key words: Pure braid groups, welded pure braid group, virtual pure braid groups,
lower central series, Chen ranks, resonance varieties, residually nilpotent, formality.
1 Introduction
1.1 Cast of characters
Let Fn be the free group on generators x1 , . . . , xn , and let Aut(Fn ) be its automorphism group. Magnus [51] showed that the map Aut(Fn ) → GLn (Z) which sends
an automorphism to the induced map on the abelianization (Fn )ab = Zn is surjective. Furthermore, the kernel of this homomorphism, denoted by IAn , is generated
by automorphisms αi j and αi jk (1 ≤ i 6= j 6= k ≤ n) which send xi to x j xi x−1
j and
Alexander I. Suciu
Department of Mathematics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
Supported in part by the National Security Agency (grant H98230-13-1-0225) and the Simons
Foundation (collaboration grant for mathematicians 354156)
He Wang
Department of Mathematics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
1
2
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
IA+
n
vPn+
wPn+
Aut(Fn )
IAn
vPn
wPn
GLn (Z)
vBn
wBn
Pn
Sn
Sn
Bn
Sn
Fig. 1 Braid-like groups and automorphism groups of free groups.
−1
xi x j xk x−1
j xk , respectively, and leave invariant the remaining generators of Fn . The
subgroup generated by the automorphisms αi j and αi jk with i < j < k is denoted by
IA+
n.
An automorphism of Fn is called a ‘permutation-conjugacy’ if it sends each
generator xi to a conjugate of xτ(i) , for some permutation τ ∈ Sn . The classical
Artin braid group Bn is the subgroup of Aut(Fn ) consisting of those permutationconjugacy automorphisms which fix the word x1 · · · xn ∈ Fn , see for instance Birman’s book [17]. The kernel of the canonical projection from Bn to the symmetric
group Sn is the pure braid group Pn on n strings. As shown by Fadell, Fox, and
Neuwirth [33, 38], a classifying space for Pn is Confn (C), the configuration space
of n ordered points on the complex line.
The set of all permutation-conjugacy automorphisms of Fn forms a subgroup
of Aut(Fn ), denoted by BΣn . The subgroup PΣn = BΣn ∩ IAn is generated by the
Magnus automorphisms αi j (1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n), while the subgroup PΣn+ = PΣn ∩IA+
n is
generated by the automorphisms αi j with i < j. In [56], McCool gave presentations
for the groups PΣn and PΣn+ ; these groups are now also called the McCool groups
and the upper McCool groups, respectively.
The welded braid groups were introduced by Fenn, Rimányi, and Rourke in [37],
who showed that the welded braid group wBn is isomorphic to BΣn . These groups,
together with the welded pure braid groups wPn ∼
= PΣn and the upper welded pure
braid groups wPn+ ∼
= PΣn+ have generated quite a bit of interest since then, see for
instance [3, 4, 8, 15, 30] and references therein. The welded pure braid group wPn
can be identified with group of motions of n unknotted, unlinked circles in the 3sphere. As shown by Brendle and Hatcher in [18], this group can be realized as the
fundamental group of the space of configurations of parallel rings in R3 .
A related class of groups are the virtual braid groups vBn , which were introduced
by Kauffman in [45] in the context of virtual knot theory, see also [42]. The kernel
of the canonical epimorphism vBn → Sn is called the virtual pure braid group vPn .
In [5], Bardakov found a concise presentation for vPn , and defined accordingly the
The pure braid groups and their relatives
3
upper virtual pure braid group vPn+ . Whether or not the virtual (pure) braid groups
are subgroups of Aut(Fn ) is an open question that goes back to [5].
The groups vPn and vPn+ were also independently studied by Bartholdi, Enriquez,
Etingof, and Rains [11] and P. Lee [50] as groups arising from the Yang-Baxter
equations. Classifying spaces for these groups (also known as the quasi-triangular
groups and the triangular groups, respectively) can be constructed by taking quotients of permutahedra by suitable actions of the symmetric groups.
The groups mentioned so far fit into the diagram from Figure 1 (a related diagram can be found in [3]). We will discuss presentations for these groups, various
extensions and homomorphisms between them, as well as their centers in §2.
1.2 Lie algebras, LCS ranks, and formality
To any finitely generated group G, there corresponds a graded Lie algebra, gr(G),
obtained by taking the direct sum of the successive quotients of the lower central
series of G, and tensoring with C. The LCS ranks of the group G are defined as
the dimensions, φk (G) = dim grk (G), of the graded pieces of this Lie algebra. As
explained in Theorem 9, the computation of these ranks is greatly simplified if the
group G satisfies certain formality properties, and its cohomology algebra is Koszul.
d is a complete,
The set of primitive elements of the completed group algebra CG
filtered Lie algebra over C, called the Malcev Lie algebra of G, and denoted by
m(G). By a theorem of Quillen [62], there exists an isomorphism of graded Lie
algebras between gr(G) and gr(m(G)).
The group G is said to be graded-formal if its associated graded Lie algebra,
gr(G), admits a quadratic presentation. The group G is said to be filtered-formal if
there exists an isomorphism of filtered Lie algebras between m(G) and the degree
completion of gr(G). Furthermore, the group G is called 1-formal if it is gradedformal and filtered-formal, or, equivalently, if there is a 1-quasi-isomorphism between the 1-minimal model of G and the cohomology algebra H ∗ (G, C) endowed
with the zero differential. We refer to [69] for a comprehensive study of these formality notions for groups.
A presentation for the Malcev Lie algebra of Pn was given by Kohno in [48],
while the associated graded Lie algebra gr(Pn ) and its graded ranks were computed
by Kohno [49] and Falk–Randell [35]. It was also realized around that time that the
pure braid groups Pn are 1-formal. As shown by Berceanu and Papadima in [15],
the Malcev Lie algebras of wPn and wPn+ admit quadratic presentations, that is, the
groups wPn and wPn+ are 1-formal. Furthermore, as shown in [11, 50], the groups
vPn and vPn+ are graded-formal. On the other hand, we show in [71] that the virtual
pure braid groups vPn and vPn+ are 1-formal if and only if n ≤ 3.
A lot is also known about the residual properties of the pure braid-like groups,
especially as they relate to the lower central series. For instance, a theorem of
Berceanu and Papadima [15], which uses work of Andreadakis [1] and an idea of
Hain [43], shows that the groups IAn are residually torsion-free nilpotent, for all n.
4
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
Table 1 Hilbert series, Koszulness, and formality of pure braid-like groups.
G
Hilbert series Hilb(H ∗ (G; C),t)
Koszulness
1-Formality
n−1
∏ (1 + jt)
Pn
j=1
(1 + nt)n−1
wPn
[49]
[44]
Yes
No (for n ≥ 4)
[2, 49, 64]
[29]
Yes
Yes
[48]
[15]
n−1
wPn+
∏ (1 + jt)
j=1
n−1
vPn
∑
i=0
[28]
n!
n−1
ti
i
(n − i)!
Yes
n
∑
j=1
j−1
j
∑ (−1)i i (k − i)n t n− j
[11, 50]
j!
[11]
[15]
[70]
No (for n ≥ 4)
Yes
i=0
Yes
No (for n ≥ 4)
Yes
[11]
vPn+
[22]
[11, 50]
[70]
Thus, the groups Pn , wPn , and wPn+ also enjoy this property. The fact that the pure
braid groups Pn are residually torsion-free nilpotent also follows from the work of
Falk and Randell [35, 36]. It is also known that the virtual pure braid groups vPn and
vPn+ are residually torsion-free nilpotent for n ≤ 3, but it is not known whether this
is the case for n ≥ 4.
1.3 Resonance varieties and Chen ranks
We conclude our survey with a discussion of the cohomology algebras of the pure
braid-like groups, and of two other related objects: the resonance varieties attached
to these graded algebras, and the Chen ranks associated to the groups themselves.
The cohomology algebra of the classical pure braid group Pn was computed by
Arnol0 d in his seminal paper on the subject, [2]. An explicit presentation for the
cohomology algebra of the McCool group wPn was given by Jensen, McCammond
and Meier [44], thereby confirming a conjecture of A. Brownstein and R. Lee. Using different methods, F. Cohen, Pakianathan, Vershinin, and Wu [28] determined
the cohomology algebra of the upper McCool group wPn+ . Finally, the cohomology
algebras of the virtual pure braid groups vPn and vPn+ were computed by Bartholdi
et al. [11] and Lee [50].
For all these groups G, the cohomology algebra A = H ∗ (G, C) is quadratic, i.e.,
it is generated in degree 1 and the ideal of relations is generated in degree 2. In fact,
for all but the groups wPn , n ≥ 4, the ideal of relations admits a quadratic Gröbner
The pure braid groups and their relatives
5
Table 2 Resonance and Chen ranks of braid-like groups.
G
First resonance variety
R1 (G) ⊆ H 1 (G; C)
n
n
3 + 4
Pn
n
planes
Resonance–
Chen ranks
formula
Chen ranks θk (G), k ≥ 3
(k − 1)
[27]
n
(k − 1)
wPn
2
planes and 4 linear
spaces of dimension 3
[21]
wPn+
(n − i) linear spaces of
dimension i ≥ 2
[71]
vP3
H 1 (vP3 , C) = C6
vP4+
3-dimensional
non-linear subvariety of
degree 6
k
[10, 70]
[70]
∑
i=3
n+1
4
n
2
2 + (k − 1)
for k 3
n+i−2
n+1
i+1 + 4
[24]
k
2
[27]
n
3
[23]
[71]
k+3
k+2
k+1
5 + 4 + 3 +
k
[70]
6 2 +k−2
(k3 − 1) +
Yes
[70]
Yes
No
No
No
[23]
[71]
[70]
[70]
basis, and so the algebra A is Koszul. For more details and references regarding this
topic, we direct the reader to Table 1 and to §3.1.
Given a group G satisfying appropriate finiteness conditions, the resonance varieties Rsi (G) are certain closed, homogeneous subvarieties of the affine space
A1 = H 1 (G; C), defined by means of the vanishing cup products in the cohomology
algebra A = H ∗ (G, C). We restrict our attention here to the first resonance variety
R1 (G) = R11 (G) attached to a finitely generated group G. This variety consists of
all elements a ∈ A1 for which there exists an element b ∈ A1 such that a ∪ b = 0, yet
b is not proportional to a.
The aforementioned computations of the cohomology algebras of the various
pure braid-like groups allows one to determine the corresponding resonance varieties, at least in principle. In the case of the first resonance varieties of the groups
Pn , wPn , and wPn+ , complete answers can be found in [27], [21], and [71], respectively, while for the virtual pure braid groups, partial answers are given in [70]. We
list some of the features of these varieties in Table 2.
By comparing the resonance varieties of the groups Pn and wPn+ , it can be shown
that these groups are not isomorphic for n ≥ 4 (cf. [71]); this answers a question of
F. Cohen et al. [28], see Remark 18. By computing the resonance variety R1 (vP4+ ),
and using the Tangent Cone Theorem from [32], we prove that the group vP4+ is not
1-formal. In view of the retraction property for 1-formality established in [69], we
conclude that the groups vPn and vPn+ are not 1-formal for n ≥ 4.
The Chen ranks of a finitely generated group G are the dimensions, θk (G) =
dim grk (G/G00 ), of the graded pieces of the graded Lie algebra associated to the
maximal metabelian quotient of G. In [19], K.-T. Chen computed the Chen ranks
6
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
of the free groups Fn , while in [54], W.S. Massey gave an alternative method for
computing the Chen ranks of a group G in terms of the Alexander invariant G0 /G00 .
The Chen ranks of the pure braid groups Pn were computed in [24], while an explicit relation between the Chen ranks and the resonance varieties of an arrangement
group was conjectured in [67]. Building on work from [26, 63, 65] and especially
[58], Cohen and Schenck confirmed this conjecture in [23] for a class of 1-formal
groups which includes arrangement groups. In the process, they also computed the
Chen ranks θk (wPn ) for k sufficiently large.
Using the Gröbner basis algorithm from [24, 26], we compute in [71] all the
Chen ranks of the upper McCool groups wPn+ . This computation, recorded here in
Theorem 16, shows that, for each n ≥ 4, the group wPn+ is not isomorphic to either
the pure braid group Pn , or to the product ∏n−1
i=1 Fi , although these three groups share
the same LCS ranks and the same Betti numbers. We also provide the Chen ranks of
the groups vPn and vPn+ for low values of n. The full computation of the Chen ranks
of the virtual pure braid groups remains to be done.
2 Braid groups and their relatives
2.1 Braid groups and pure braid groups
Let Aut(Fn ) be the group of (right) automorphisms of the free group Fn on generators x1 , . . . , xn . Recall that the Artin braid group Bn consists of those permutationconjugacy automorphisms which fix the word x1 · · · xn ∈ Fn . In particular, B1 = {1}
and B2 = Z. The natural inclusion αn : Bn ,→ Aut(Fn ) is also known as the Artin
representation of the braid group.
For each 1 ≤ i < n, let σi be the braid automorphism which sends xi to xi xi+1 xi−1
and xi+1 to xi , while leaving the other generators of Fn fixed. As shown for instance
in [17], the braid group Bn is generated by the elementary braids σ1 , . . . , σn−1 , subject to the well-known relations
(
σi σi+1 σi = σi+1 σi σi+1 , 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 2,
(R1)
|i − j| ≥ 2.
σi σ j = σ j σi ,
On the other hand, the symmetric group Sn has a presentation with generators si
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 and relations
si si+1 si = si+1 si si+1 , 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 2,
|i − j| ≥ 2.
si s j = s j si ,
(R2)
2
1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1;
si = 1,
The canonical projection from the braid group to the symmetric group, which
sends the elementary braid σi to the transposition si , has kernel the pure braid group
The pure braid groups and their relatives
7
on n strings,
Pn = ker(φ : Bn Sn ) = Bn ∩ IAn ,
(1)
where φ (σi ) = si for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1. The group Pn is generated by the n-stranded
braids
−1
−1
(2)
· · · σ −1
Ai j = σ j−1 σ j−2 · · · σi+1 σi2 σi+1
j−2 σ j−1 ,
for 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n. It is readily seen that P1 = {1}, P2 = Z, and P3 ∼
= F2 × Z. More
generally, as shown by Fadell and Neuwirth [33] (see also [35, 36, 25]), the pure
braid group Pn can be decomposed as an iterated semi-direct product of free groups,
Pn = Fn−1 oαn−1 Pn−1 = Fn−1 o Fn−2 o · · · o F1 ,
(3)
where αn−1 : Pn−1 ,→ Aut(Fn ) is the restriction of the Artin representation of the
braid group Bn−1 to the pure braid subgroup Pn−1 .
Work of Chow [20] and Birman [17] shows that the center Z(Pn ) of the pure
braid group on n ≥ 2 strands is infinite cyclic, generated by the full twist braid
= Pn × Z, where Pn = Pn /Z(Pn ).
∏1≤i< j≤n Ai j . It follows that Pn ∼
2.2 Welded braid groups
The set of all permutation-conjugacy automorphisms of the free group of rank n
forms the braid-permutation group wBn . This group has a presentation with generators σi and si (1 ≤ i < n) and relations (R1) and (R2), as well as
(
si σ j = σ j si ,
|i − j| ≥ 2,
(R3)
σi si+1 si = si+1 si σi+1 , 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 2,
and
si σi+1 σi = σi+1 σi si+1 ,
classical
1 ≤ i ≤ n − 2.
welded
(R4)
virtual
Fig. 2 Braid crossings.
The three types of braid crossings mentioned above are depicted in Figure 2.
The welded pure braid group wPn , also known as the group of basis-conjugating
automorphisms in [4, 37, 21], or the McCool group in [15], is defined as
wPn = ker(ρ : wBn Sn ) = wBn ∩ IAn ,
(4)
8
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
where ρ(σi ) = ρ(si ) = si for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1. As shown by McCool in [56], this group
is generated by the Magnus automorphisms αi j , for all 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n, subject to the
relations
αi j αik α jk = α jk αik αi j ,
for i, j, k distinct,
[αi j , αst ] = 1,
if {i, j} ∩ {s,t} = 0,
/
[αik , α jk ] = 1,
for i, j, k distinct.
In particular, wP1 = {1} and wP2 = F2 .
Consider now the upper welded pure braid group (or, the upper McCool group)
wPn+ = wPn ∩ IA+
n . This is the subgroup of wPn generated by all the automorphisms
αi j with i < j. It readily seen that wP1+ = {1}, wP2+ = Z, and wP3+ ∼
= F2 × Z. Furthermore, as shown by F. Cohen et al. [28], the group wPn+ can be decomposed as
an iterated semi-direct product of free groups,
+
wPn+ = Fn−1 oα + wPn−1
= Fn−1 o Fn−2 o · · · o F1 ,
n−1
(5)
+
+
,→ Aut(Fn−1 ) is the restriction of the Artin representation of
: wPn−1
where αn−1
+
Bn−1 to wPn−1 .
It follows from the previous discussion that Pn ∼
= wPn+ for n ≤ 3. In view of this
fact, a natural question (asked by F. Cohen et al. in [28]) is whether the groups Pn
and wPn+ are isomorphic for n ≥ 4. A negative answer will be given in Corollary 17.
In the same circle of ideas, let us also mention the following result from [71].
Proposition 1 ([71]). For each n ≥ 4, the inclusion map wPn+ ,→ wPn is not a split
monomorphism.
The proof of this proposition is based upon the contrasting nature of the resonance varieties of the two groups. We will come back to this point in §3.
Cohen and Pruidze showed in [22] that the center of the group wPn+ (n ≥ 2) is
infinite cyclic, generated by the automorphism ∏1≤ j≤n−1 α j,n . On the other hand,
Dies and Nicas showed in [31] that the center of the group wPn is trivial for n ≥ 2.
2.3 Virtual braid groups
Closely related are the virtual braid groups vBn , the virtual pure braid groups vPn ,
and their upper triangular subgroups, vPn+ , obtained by omitting certain commutation relations from the respective McCool groups. The group vBn admits a presentation with generators σi and si for i = 1, . . . , n − 1, subject to the relations (R1), (R2),
and (R3). The virtual pure braid group vPn is defined as the kernel of the canonical
epimorphism ψ : vBn → Sn given by ψ(σi ) = ψ(si ) = si for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1, see [5].
A finite presentation for vPn was given by Bardakov [5]. The virtual pure braid
group vPn and its ‘upper’ subgroup, vPn+ , were both studied in depth (under different names) by Bartholdi et al. and Lee in [11, 50]. These groups are generated by
The pure braid groups and their relatives
9
elements xi j for i 6= j (respectively, for i < j), subject to the relations
xi j xik x jk = x jk xik xi j ,
for i, j, k distinct,
if {i, j} ∩ {s,t} = 0.
/
[xi j , xst ] = 1,
Unlike the inclusion map wPn+ ,→ wPn from Proposition 1, the inclusion vPn+ ,→
vPn does admit a splitting, see [11, 70].
Proposition 2. There exist monomorphisms and epimorphisms making the following diagram commute.
Bn
Pn
ϕn
vBn
vPn
πn
wBn
wPn
Furthermore, the compositions of the horizontal homomorphisms are also injective.
Proof. There are natural inclusions ϕn : Bn ,→ vBn and ψn : Bn ,→ wBn that send σi
to σi , as well as a canonical projection πn : vBn wBn , that matches the generators
σi and si of the respective groups. By construction, we have that πn ◦ ϕn = ψn .
We claim that these homomorphisms restrict to homomorphisms between the
respective pure-braid like groups. Indeed, as shown Bartholdi et al. in [11], the homomorphism ϕn restricts to a map Pn ,→ vPn , given by
Ai j 7→ x j−1, j . . . xi+1, j xi, j x j,i (x j−1, j . . . xi+1, j )−1 .
(6)
Clearly, the projection πn restricts to a map vPn wPn that sends xi j to αi j . Using
these observations, together with work of Bardakov [5], we see that the homomorphism ψn restricts to an injective map Pn ,→ wPn .
t
u
From the defining presentations, it is readily seen that vP2+ ∼
= Z and vP2 ∼
= F2 ,
+ ∼
2
while vP3 = Z ∗ Z . Moreover, using a computation of Bardakov et al. [10], we
show in [70] that vP3 ∼
= P4 ∗ Z. Consequently vP2 , vP3 and vP3+ have trivial centers.
More generally, Dies and Nicas showed in [31] that the center of the group vPn is
trivial for n ≥ 2; furthermore, the center of vPn+ is trivial for n ≥ 3, with one possible
exception (and no exception if Wilf’s conjecture is true).
Remark 3. In Lemma 6 from [5], Bardakov states that the group vPn splits as a
semi-direct product of the form Vn∗ o vPn−1 , where Vn∗ is a free group. This lemma
would imply, via an easy induction argument, that Z(vPn ) = {1} for n ≥ 2 and
Z(vPn+ ) = {1} for n ≥ 3. Unfortunately, there seems to be a problem with this
lemma, according to the penultimate remark from [39, §6].
10
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
2.4 Topological interpretations
All the braid-like groups mentioned previously admit nice topological interpretations. For instance, the braid group Bn can be realized as the mapping class group
of the 2-disk with n marked points, Mod10,n , while the pure braid group Pn can be
viewed as the fundamental group of the configuration space of n ordered points on
the complex line, Confn (C) = {(z1 , . . . , zn ) ∈ Cn | zi 6= z j for i 6= j}, see for instance
[17].
Classical move
Welded move
Fig. 3 Untwisted flying rings.
The welded braid group wBn is the fundamental group of the ‘untwisted ring
space,’ which consists of all configurations of n parallel rings (i.e., unknotted circles)
in R3 , see Figure 3. However, as shown in [18], this space is not aspherical. The
welded pure braid group wPn can be viewed as the pure motion group of n unknotted,
unlinked circles in R3 , cf. Goldsmith [40]. The group wPn+ is the fundamental group
of the subspace consisting of all configurations of circles of unequal diameters in the
‘untwisted ring space,’ see Brendle–Hatcher [18] and Bellingeri–Bodin [13].
(2,1,3)
(1,2,3)
(1,3,2)
(2,3,1)
(3,2,1)
(3,1,2)
Fig. 4 P3 and P4 .
A classifying space for the group vPn+ is identified in [11] as the quotient space of
the (n − 1)-dimensional permutahedron Pn by actions of certain symmetric groups.
More precisely, let Pn be the convex hull of the orbit of a generic point in Rn under
The pure braid groups and their relatives
11
the permutation action of the symmetric group Sn on its coordinates. Then Pn is a
polytope whose faces are indexed by all ordered partitions of the set [n] = {1, . . . , n};
see Figure 4. For each r ∈ [n], there is a natural action of Sr on the disjoint union of
all (n − r)-dimensional faces of this polytope, C1 t · · · tCr . Similarly, a classifying
space for vPn can be constructed as a quotient space of Pn × Sn .
3 Cohomology algebras and resonance varieties
3.1 Cohomology algebras
Recall that the pure braid group Pn is the fundamental group of the configuration
space Confn (C). As shown by Arnol0 d in [2], the cohomology ring H ∗ (Pn ; Z) is
the skew-commutative ring generated by degree 1 elements ui j (1 ≤ i < j ≤ n),
dz −dz
identified with the de Rham cocycles zii −z j j . The cohomology algebras of the other
pure braid-like groups were computed by several groups of researchers over the last
ten years, see [44, 28, 11, 50].
We summarize these computations, as follows. To start with, we denote the standard (degree 1) generators of H ∗ (wPn ; C) and H ∗ (vPn ; C) by ai j for 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n,
and we denote the generators of H ∗ (wPn+ ; C) and H ∗ (vPn+ ; C) by ei j for 1 ≤ i < j ≤
n. Next, we list several types of relations that occur in these algebras.
u jk uik = ui j (uik − u jk )
for i < j < k,
(I1)
for i 6= j,
(I2)
ak j aik = ai j (aik − a jk )
for i, j, k distinct,
(I3)
a ji aik = (ai j − aik )a jk
for i, j, k distinct,
(I4)
ei j (eik − e jk ) = 0
for i < j < k,
(I5)
(ei j − eik )e jk = 0
for i < j < k.
(I6)
ai j a ji = 0
Finally, we record in Table 3 the cohomology algebras of the pure braid groups,
the welded pure braid groups, the virtual pure braid groups, and their upper triangular subgroups.
Table 3 Cohomology algebras of the pure braid-like groups.
Generators
Relations
H ∗ (Pn ; C)
H ∗ (wPn ; C)
H ∗ (wPn+ ; C)
H ∗ (vPn ; C)
H ∗ (vPn+ ; C)
[2]
[44]
[28]
[11, 50]
[11, 50]
ui j
ai j
1 ≤ i < j ≤ n 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n
(I1)
(I2) (I3)
ei j
ai j
ei j
1 ≤ i < j ≤ n 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n
(I5)
(I2) (I3) (I4)
(I5) (I6)
12
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
The above presentations of the cohomology algebras differ slightly from those
given in the original papers. Using these presentations, it is easily seen that the
aforementioned homomorphisms, fn : vPn ,→ wPn and gn : vPn+ ,→ wPn+ , induce epimorphisms in cohomology with C-coefficients.
Let us also highlight the fact that the cohomology algebras of the pure braidlike groups are quadratic algebras. More precisely, they are all algebras of the form
A = E/I, where E is an exterior algebra generated in degree 1, and I is an ideal
generated in degree 2.
It is also known that the cohomology algebras of all these groups (with the exception of wPn for n ≥ 4) are Koszul algebras. That is to say, for each such algebra A, the ground field C admits a free, linear resolution over A, or equivalently,
TorAi (C, C) j = 0 for i 6= j. In fact, it is known that in all these cases, the relations
specified in Table 3 form a quadratic Gröbner basis for the ideal of relations I, a fact
which implies Koszulness for the algebra A = E/I. On the other hand, it was recently shown by Conner and Goetz [29] that the cohomology algebras of the groups
wPn are not Koszul for n ≥ 4.
For a summary of the above discussion, as well as detailed references for the
various statements therein we refer to Table 1.
3.2 Resonance varieties
Now let A = i≥0 Ai be a graded, graded-commutative algebra over C. We shall
assume that A is connected, i.e., A0 = C, generated by the unit 1. For each element
a ∈ A1 , one can form a cochain complex, (A, δa ), known as the Aomoto complex,
with differentials δai : Ai → Ai+1 given by δai (u) = a · u.
The resonance varieties of the graded algebra A are the jump loci for the cohomology of the Aomoto complexes parametrized by the vector space A1 . More
precisely, for each i ≥ 0 and s ≥ 1, the (degree i, depth s) resonance variety of A is
the set
Rsi (A) = {a ∈ A1 | dim H i (A, δa ) ≥ s}.
(7)
L
If A is locally finite (i.e., each graded piece Ai is finite-dimensional), then all these
sets are closed, homogeneous subvarieties of the affine space A1 .
The resonance varieties of a finitely-generated group G are defined as Rsi (G) :=
i
Rs (A), where A = H ∗ (G, C) is the cohomology algebra of the group. If G admits
a classifying space with finite k-skeleton, for some k ≥ 1, then the sets Rsi (G) are
algebraic subvarieties of the affine space A1 , for all i ≤ k, see [60, Corollary 4.2].
We will focus here on the first resonance variety R1 (G) := R11 (G), which can be
described more succinctly as
R1 (G) = {a ∈ A1 | ∃ b ∈ A1 \ C · a such that ab = 0 ∈ A2 }.
(8)
The idea of studying a family of cochain complexes parametrized by the cohomology ring in degree 1 originated from the theory of hyperplane arrangements, in
The pure braid groups and their relatives
13
the work of Falk [34], while the more general concept from (8) first appeared in
work of Matei and Suciu [55].
The resonance varieties of a variety spaces and groups have been studied intensively from many perspectives and in varying degrees of generality, see for instance
[32, 68, 60] and reference therein. In particular, the first resonance varieties of the
groups Pn , wPn , and wPn+ have been completely determined in [27, 21, 71]. We
summarize those results as follows.
Theorem 4 ([27]). For each n ≥ 3, the first resonance variety of the pure braid
group Pn has decomposition into irreducible components given by
R1 (Pn ) =
[
[
Li jk ∪
Li jkl ,
1≤i< j<k<l≤n
1≤i< j<k≤n
where
• Li jk is the plane defined by the equations ∑{p,q}⊂{i, j,k} x pq = 0 and xst = 0 if
{s,t} * {i, j, k};
• Li jkl is the plane defined by the equations ∑{p,q}⊂{i, j,k,l} x pq = 0, xi j = xkl , x jk =
xil , xik = x jl and xst = 0 if {s,t} * {i, j, k, l}.
Theorem 5 ([21]). For each n ≥ 2, the first resonance variety of the group wPn has
decomposition into irreducible components given by
R1 (wPn ) =
[
[
Li j ∪
1≤i< j≤n
Li jk ,
1≤i< j<k≤n
where Li j is the plane defined by the equations x pq = 0 if {p, q} =
6 {i, j} and Li jk is
the 3-dimensional linear subspace defined by the equations x ji + xki = xi j + xk j =
xik + x jk = 0 and xst = 0 if {s,t} * {i, j, k}.
Theorem 6 ([71]). For each n ≥ 2, the first resonance variety of the group wPn+ has
decomposition into irreducible components given by
R1 (wPn+ ) =
[
Li, j ,
n−1≥i> j≥1
where Li, j is the linear subspace of dimension j +1 spanned by ei+1, j+1 and e j+1,k −
ei+1,k , for 1 ≤ k ≤ j.
Much less is known about the resonance varieties of the virtual pure braid groups.
For low values of n, the varieties R1 (vPn ) and R1 (vPn+ ) have been determined in
[70]. For instance, the decomposition vP3 ∼
= P4 ∗ Z and known properties of resonance varieties of free products leads to the equality R1 (vP3 ) = H 1 (vP3 , C). We will
need the following computation later on.
Proposition 7 ([70]). The resonance variety R1 (vP4+ ) is the degree 6, irreducible,
3-dimensional subvariety of the affine space H 1 (vP4+ , C) = C6 defined by the equations
14
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
x12 x24 (x13 + x23 ) + x13 x34 (x12 − x23 ) − x24 x34 (x12 + x13 ) = 0,
x12 x23 (x14 + x24 ) + x12 x34 (x23 − x14 ) + x14 x34 (x23 + x24 ) = 0,
x13 x23 (x14 + x24 ) + x14 x24 (x13 + x23 ) + x34 (x13 x23 − x14 x24 ) = 0,
x12 (x13 x14 − x23 x24 ) + x34 (x13 x23 − x14 x24 ) = 0.
4 Lie algebras and formality
4.1 The associated graded Lie algebra of a group
The lower central series of a group G is a descending sequence of normal subgroups,
{γk G}k≥1 , defined inductively by γ1 G = G and γk+1 G = [γk G, G]. The successive
quotients of this series, γk G/γk+1 G, are abelian groups. The direct sum of these
groups,
M
gr(G; Z) =
γk G/γk+1 G,
(9)
k≥1
endowed with the Lie bracket [x, y] induced from the group commutator, has the
structure of a graded Lie algebra over Z. The associated graded Lie algebra of G
over C is defined as gr(G) = gr(G; Z) ⊗Z C. Before proceeding, let us recall the
following lemma due to Falk and Randell [36].
Lemma 8 ([36]). Let 1 / N / G / Q / 1 be a split exact sequence of groups,
and suppose Q acts trivially on N/[N, N]. Then, for each k ≥ 1, there is an induced
split exact sequence, 1 / γk (N) / γk (G) / γk (Q) / 1 .
If a group G is finitely generated, its lower central series quotients are finitely
generated abelian groups. Set
φk (G) = rank γk G/γk+1 G,
(10)
or, equivalently, φk (G) = dim grk (G). These LCS ranks can be computed from
the Hilbert series of the universal enveloping algebra of gr(G) by means of the
Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem, as follows:
∏ (1 − t k )−φk (G) = Hilb(U(gr(G)),t).
(11)
k≥1
A finitely generated group G is said to be graded-formal if the associated graded
Lie algebra gr(G) is quadratic, that is, admits a presentation with generators in degree 1 and relators in degree 2. The next theorem was proved under some stronger
hypothesis by Papadima and Yuzvinsky in [61], and essentially in this form in [69].
For completeness, we sketch the proof.
Theorem 9 ([61, 69]). If G is a finitely generated, graded-formal group, and its
cohomology algebra, A = H ∗ (G; C), is Koszul, then the LCS ranks of G are given
The pure braid groups and their relatives
15
by
∞
∏ (1 − t k )φk (G) = Hilb(A, −t).
(12)
k=1
Proof. By assumption, the graded Lie algebra g = gr(G) is quadratic, while the
algebra A = H ∗ (G; C) is Koszul, hence quadratic. Write A = T (V )/I, where T (V ) is
the tensor algebra on a finite-dimensional C-vector space V concentrated in degree
1, and I is an ideal generated in degree 2. Define the quadratic dual of A as A! =
T (V ∗ )/I ⊥ , where V ∗ is the vector space dual to V and I ⊥ is the ideal generated by
all α ∈ V ∗ ∧V ∗ with α(I2 ) = 0, see [64]. It follows from [61, Lemma 4.1] that A! is
isomorphic to U(g).
Now, since A is Koszul, its quadratic dual is also Koszul. Thus, the following
Koszul duality formula holds:
Hilb(A,t) · Hilb(A! , −t) = 1.
(13)
t
u
Putting things together and using (11) completes the proof.
4.2 The LCS ranks of the pure-braid like groups
We now turn to the associated graded Lie algebras of the pure braid-like groups. We
start by listing the types of relations occurring in these Lie algebras:
[xi j , xik ] + [xi j , x jk ] + [xik , x jk ] = 0
for distinct i, j, k,
(L1)
[xi j , xkl ] = 0
for {i, j} ∩ {k, l} = 0,
/
(L2)
[xik , x jk ] = 0
for distinct i, j, k,
(L3)
for m = j, k and i, j, m distinct.
(L4)
[xim , xi j + xik + x jk ] = 0
The corresponding presentations for the associated graded Lie algebras of the
groups Pn , wPn , wPn+ , vPn , and vPn+ are summarized in Table 4. It is readily seen that
all these graded Lie algebras are quadratic. Consequently, all aforementioned pure
braid-like groups are graded-formal.
Table 4 Associated graded Lie algebras of the pure braid-like groups.
Generators
Relations
gr(Pn )
gr(wPn )
gr(wPn+ )
gr(vPn )
gr(vPn+ )
[48, 35]
[44]
[28]
[11, 50]
[11, 50]
xi j ,
xi j ,
1 ≤ i < j ≤ n 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n
(L2) (L4)
xi j ,
xi j ,
xi j ,
1 ≤ i < j ≤ n 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n
(L1) (L2) (L3) (L1) (L2) (L3)
(L1) (L2)
(L1) (L2)
16
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
The various homomorphisms between the pure-braid like groups defined previously induce morphisms between the corresponding associated graded Lie algebras.
These morphisms fit into the following commuting diagram.
gr(vPn+ )
gr(vPn )
gr(Pn ) .
gr(wPn+ )
(14)
gr(wPn )
As shown by Bartholdi et al. in [11], the morphism gr(ϕn ) : gr(Pn ) → gr(vPn )
is injective. Using the presentations given in Table 4, we see that the remaining
morphisms are either injective or surjective (as indicated in the diagram), with the
possible exception of gr(ψn ) : gr(Pn ) → gr(wPn ), whose injectivity has not been
established, as far as we know.
The LCS ranks of the pure braid groups Pn were computed by Kohno [49], using
methods from rational homotopy theory, and by Falk and Randell [35], using the
decomposition (3) and Lemma 8. The LCS ranks of the upper welded braid groups
wPn+ were computed by F. Cohen et al. [28], using the decomposition (5) and again
Lemma 8. Finally, work of Bartholdi et al. [11] and P. Lee [50] gives the LCS ranks
of vPn and vPn+ . We summarize these results in the next theorem.
Theorem 10. The LCS ranks of the groups G = Pn , wPn+ , vPn , and vPn+ are given
k φk (G) = Hilb(H ∗ (G; C), −t), with the relevant Hilbert
by the identity ∏∞
k=1 (1 − t )
series given in Table 1.
Alternatively, this result follows from Theorem 9 once it is shown that, in all these
cases, the Lie algebra gr(G) is quadratic and the cohomology algebra A = H ∗ (G; C)
is Koszul.
On the other hand, as mentioned previously, the cohomology algebras H ∗ (wPn , C)
are not Koszul for n ≥ 4. The (computer-aided) proof of this fact by Conner and
Goetz [29] implies that the LCS ranks of wPn are not given by formula (12).
For instance, the formula would say that the first eight LCS ranks of wP4 are
12, 18, 60, 180, 612, 2 010, 7 020, and 24 480. Using the computations from [29], we
see that the first seven values of φk (wP4 ) are correct, but that φ8 (wP4 ) = 24 490.
4.3 Residual properties
Let P be a group-theoretic property. A group G is said to be residually P if for
any g ∈ G, g 6= 1, there exists a group Q satisfying property P, and an epimorphism
ψ : G → Q such that ψ(g) 6= 1.
We are mainly interested here in the residual properties related to the lower central series of G. For instance, we say that the group G is residually nilpotent if every
non-trivial element can be detected in a nilpotentT quotient. This happens precisely
when the nilpotent radical of G is trivial, that is, k≥1 γk G = {1}.
The pure braid groups and their relatives
17
Likewise, we say that a group G is residually torsion-free nilpotent if every nontrivial element can
be detected in a torsion-free nilpotent quotient. This happens
T
precisely when k≥1 τk G = {1}, where
τk G = {g ∈ G | gn ∈ γk G, for some n ∈ N}.
(15)
Clearly, the second property is stronger than the first. Nevertheless, the following
holds: if G is residually nilpotent and grk (G, Z) is torsion-free, for each k ≥ 1, then
G is residually torsion-free nilpotent. In turn, this last property implies that G is
torsion-free. Moreover, residually nilpotent groups are residually finite.
For a group G, the properties of being residually nilpotent or residually torsionfree nilpotent are inherited by subgroups H < G, since γk H < γk G and τk H < τk G.
Moreover, both properties are preserved under direct products and free products, see
Malcev [52] and Baumslag [12]. For more on this subject, see also [6, 7, 46].
In [1], Andreadakis introduced a new filtration on the automorphism group of
a group G, nowadays called the Andreadakis–Johnson filtration. This filtration is
defined by setting
Φk (Aut(G)) = ker(Aut(G) → Aut(G/γk+1 (G)),
(16)
for all k ≥ 0. Note that Φ0 (Aut(G)) = Aut(G); the group I (G) = Φ1 (Aut(G)) is
called the Torelli group of G.
T
As shown
by Andreadakis, if the intersection k≥1 γk G is trivial then the interT
section k≥1 Φk (Aut(G)) is also trivial. Furthermore, a theorem of L. Kaloujnine
implies that γk (I (G)) < Φk (Aut(G)) for all k ≥ 1, see e.g. [59]. We thus have the
following basic result.
Theorem 11 ([1]). Let G be a residually nilpotent group. Then the Torelli group
I (G) is also residually nilpotent.
As noted by Hain [43] in the case of the Torelli group of a Riemann surface and
proved by Berceanu and Papadima [15] in full generality, a stronger assumption
leads to a stronger conclusion.
Theorem 12 ([43, 15]). Let G be a finitely generated, residually nilpotent group,
and suppose grk (G, Z) is torsion-free for all k ≥ 1. Then the Torelli group I (G) is
residually torsion-free nilpotent.
We specialize now to the case G = Fn . In [51] Magnus showed that all free
groups are residually torsion-free nilpotent (this also follows from the aforementioned results of Malcev and Baumslag). Furthermore, P. Hall and Magnus showed
that gr(Fn , Z) is the free Lie algebra on n generators, and thus is torsion-free (see
[66, Ch. IV, §6]). Therefore, by Theorem 12, the Torelli group IAn = I (Fn ) is resid+
ually torsion-free nilpotent. Hence, all its subgroups, such as IA+
n , Pn , wPn , and wPn
also enjoy this property.
Let us now look in more detail at the residual properties of the braid groups and
their relatives. We start with the classical braid groups. As shown by Krammer [47]
18
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
and Bigelow [16], the braid groups Bn admit faithful linear representations, and thus,
by a theorem of Malcev, they are residually finite. On the other hand, it was shown
in [41] by Gorin and Lin that γ2 Bn = γ3 Bn for n ≥ 3 (see [14] for an alternative
proof); thus, the braid groups Bn are not residually nilpotent for n ≥ 3. Since both
the welded braid group wBn and the virtual braid group vBn contain the braid group
Bn as a subgroup, we conclude that wBn and vBn are not residually nilpotent for
n ≥ 3, either (see also [6]).
A different approach to the residual properties of the pure braid groups was taken
by Falk and Randell in [36]. Using the semi-direct product decomposition (3) and
Lemma 8, these authors gave another proof that the groups Pn are residually nilpotent; in fact, their proof shows that Pn is residually torsion-free nilpotent, see [6]. A
similar approach, based on decomposition (5) provides another proof that the upper
McCool groups wPn+ are residually torsion-free nilpotent.
From the work of Berceanu and Papadima [15] mentioned above, we know that
the full McCool groups wPn are residually torsion-free nilpotent. For n = 3, an
even stronger result was proved by Metaftsis and Papistas [57], who showed that
grk (wP3 , Z) is torsion-free for all k. Whether an analogous statement holds for the
McCool groups wPn with n ≥ 4 is an open problem.
Finally, let us consider the virtual pure braid groups. Clearly, the groups vP2+ = Z,
vP2 = F2 , and vP3+ = Z ∗ Z2 are all residually torsion-free nilpotent. Bardakov et
al. [10] show that the group vP3 also enjoys this property. Alternatively, this can be
seen from our decomposition vP3 ∼
= P4 ∗ Z, the fact that both P4 and Z have this
property, and the aforementioned result of Malcev. Whether or not the groups vPn
and vPn+ are residually torsion-free nilpotent for n ≥ 4 is an open problem, see [6].
4.4 Malcev Lie algebras and formality properties
For each finitely-generated, torsion-free nilpotent group N, A.I. Malcev [53] constructed a filtered Lie algebra m(N) over Q, which is now called the Malcev Lie
algebra of N. Given a finitely generated group G, the inverse limit of the Malcev
Lie algebras of the torsion free parts of the nilpotent quotients G/γi G for i ≥ 2 defines the Malcev Lie algebra of the group G, which we denote by m(G). This Lie
algebra coincides with the dual Lie algebra of the 1-minimal model of G defined by
D. Sullivan. For relevant background, we refer to [69] and references therein.
We will use another equivalent definition of the Malcev Lie algebra which was
given by Quillen in [62]. The group-algebra CG has a natural Hopf algebra structure
with comultiplication ∆ : CG ⊗ CG → CG given by ∆ (x) = x ⊗ x for x ∈ G. Let
d = lim CG/I r be the completion of CG with respect to the I-adic filtration,
CG
←−r
d is called primitive if ∆bx =
where I is the augmentation ideal. An element x ∈ CG
ˆ
ˆ
x⊗1 + 1⊗x. The Malcev Lie algebra m(G) is then the set of all primitive elements
d with Lie bracket [x, y] = xy − yx, and endowed with the induced filtration.
in CG,
The pure braid groups and their relatives
19
The group G is said to be filtered-formal if there exists an isomorphism of filtered
b
Lie algebras, m(G) ∼
The group G is 1-formal if there exists an filtered Lie
= gr(G).
algebra isomorphism m(G) ∼
h, where h is a quadratic Lie algebra. As shown in
=b
[69], a finitely generated group G is 1-formal if and only if it is both graded-formal
and filtered-formal.
Theorem 13. For each n ≥ 1, the following hold.
1. ([2, 48]) The pure braid group Pn is 1-formal.
2. ([15]) The welded pure braid groups wPn and wPn+ are 1-formal.
3. ([11, 50]) The virtual pure braid groups vPn and vPn+ are graded-formal.
Let us now recall the following consequence of the ‘Tangent Cone Theorem’
from [32].
Theorem 14 ([32]). Let G be a finitely generated, 1-formal group. Then all irreducible components of R1 (G) are rationally defined linear subspaces of H 1 (G, C).
In view of Proposition 7 and Theorem 14, the group vP4+ is not 1-formal. In fact,
we have the following theorem.
Theorem 15 ([71]). For the virtual pure braid group vPn and its upper-triangular
subgroup, vPn+ , the following hold: both are 1-formal for n ≤ 3, and both are nonfiltered-formal for n ≥ 4.
4.5 Chen ranks
The Chen Lie algebra of a finitely generated group G is defined to be the associated
graded Lie algebra of its second derived quotient, G/G00 . The projection π : G
G/G00 induces an epimorphism, gr(π) : gr(G) gr(G/G00 ). It is readily verified
that grk (π) is an isomorphism for k ≤ 3.
In [19], K.-T. Chen gave a method for finding a basis for gr(G/G00 ) via a path
integral technique for free groups. In the process, he showed that the Chen ranks of
the free group of rank n are given by θ1 (Fn ) = n and
n+k−2
θk (Fn ) =
(k − 1), for k ≥ 2.
(17)
k
As shown by Massey in [54], the Chen ranks of a group G can be computed
from the Alexander invariant G0 /G00 . In [24, 26], Cohen and Suciu developed this
method, by introducing the use of Gröbner basis techniques in this context. As an
application, they showed in [24] that the Chen ranks of the pure braid groups Pn are
given by
n+1
θk (Pn ) = (k − 1)
, for k ≥ 3.
(18)
4
20
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
Based on this and many other similar computations, the first author conjectured
in [67] that for k 0, the Chen ranks of an arrangement group G are given by
θk (G) =
∑ cm · θk (Fm ),
(19)
m≥2
where cm is the number of m-dimensional components of R1 (G). Much work has
gone into proving this conjecture, with special cases being verified in [63, 58, 65].
A key advance was made in [58], where it was shown that the Chen ranks of a
finitely presented, 1-formal group G are determined by the truncated cohomology
ring H ≤2 (G, C).
Using this fact, Cohen and Schenck show in [23] that, for a finitely presented,
commutator-relators 1-formal group G, the Chen ranks formula (19) holds, provided the components of R1 (G) are isotropic, projectively disjoint, and reduced
as a scheme. They also verify that arrangement groups and the welded pure braid
groups wPn satisfy these conditions. From the Chen ranks formula (19) and the first
resonance varieties of wPn in (5), they deduce that for k 1, the Chen ranks of wPn
are given by
n
n
θk (wPn ) = (k − 1)
+ (k2 − 1)
.
(20)
2
3
We conjecture that formula (20) holds for all n and all k ≥ 4. We have verified
this conjecture for n ≤ 8, based on direct computations of the Chen ranks of the
groups wPn in that range.
However, the resonance varieties of wPn+ do not satisfy the isotropicity hypothesis. Nevertheless, we compute in [71] the Chen ranks of these groups, using the
Gröbner basis algorithm outlined in [24]. The result reads as follows.
Theorem 16 ([71]). The Chen ranks of wPn+ are given by θ1 = n2 , θ2 = n3 , θ3 =
2 n+1
4 , and
θk =
k
n+k−2
n+i−2
n+1
+ θk−1 = ∑
+
k+1
i+1
4
i=3
for k ≥ 4.
We have seen previously that the pure braid group Pn , the upper McCool group
wPn+ , and the group Πn = ∏n−1
i=1 Fi share the same LCS ranks and the same Betti
numbers. Furthermore, the centers of all these groups are infinite cyclic, provided
n ≥ 2. However, the Chen ranks can distinguish these groups.
Corollary 17 ([71]). For n ≥ 4, the pure braid group Pn , the upper McCool group
wPn+ , and the group Πn are all pairwise non-isomorphic.
Remark 18. The fact that Pn ∼
6 wPn+ for n ≥ 4 answers in the negative Problem
=
1 from [28, §10]. An alternate solution for n = 4 was given by Bardakov and
Mikhailov in [9], but that solution relies on the claim that the single-variable Alexander polynomial of a finitely presented group G is an invariant of the group, a claim
which is far from being true if b1 (G) > 1.
The pure braid groups and their relatives
21
The Chen ranks of the virtual pure braid groups and their upper triangular subgroups are more complicated. We summarize some of our computations of these
ranks, as follows.
∑ θk (vP3+ )t k−2 = (2 − t)/(1 − t)3 ,
k≥2
∑ θk (vP4+ )t k−2 = (8 − 3t + t 2 )/(1 − t)4 ,
k≥2
∑ θk (vP5+ )t k−2 = (20 + 15t + 5t 2 )/(1 − t)4 ,
k≥2
∑ θk (vP6+ )t k−2 = (40 + 35t − 40t 2 − 20t 3 )/(1 − t)5 .
k≥2
∑ θk (vP3 )t k−2 = (9 − 20t + 15t 2 − 4t 4 + t 5 )/(1 − t)6 .
k≥2
It would be interesting to find closed formulas for the Chen ranks of the groups
vPn+ and vPn , but this seems to be a very challenging undertaking.
References
1. Stylianos Andreadakis, On the automorphisms of free groups and free nilpotent groups, Proc.
London Math. Soc. (3) 15 (1965), no. 1, 239–268. MR0188307 1.2, 4.3, 11
2. Vladimir I. Arnol0 d, The cohomology ring of the group of dyed braids, Mat. Zametki 5 (1969),
no. 2, 227–231. MR0242196 1, 1.3, 3.1, 3, 1
3. Benjamin Audoux, Paolo Bellingeri, Jean-Baptiste Meilhan, and Emmanuel Wagner, On
usual, virtual and welded knotted objects up to homotopy, J. Math. Soc. Japan (to appear),
arXiv:1507.00202v2. 1.1
4. Dror Bar-Natan and Zsuzsanna Dancso, Finite type invariants of w-knotted objects I: wknots and the Alexander polynomial, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 16 (2016), no. 2, 1063–1133.
MR3493416 1.1, 2.2
5. Valerij G. Bardakov, The virtual and universal braids, Fund. Math. 184 (2004), 1–18.
MR2128039 1.1, 2.3, 2.3, 3
6. Valerij G. Bardakov and Paolo Bellingeri, Combinatorial properties of virtual braids, Topology Appl. 156 (2009), no. 6, 1071–1082. MR2493369 4.3, 4.3
7. Valerij G. Bardakov and Paolo Bellingeri, On residual properties of pure braid groups of
closed surfaces, Comm. Algebra 37 (2009), no. 5, 1481–1490. MR2526317 4.3
8. Valeriy G. Bardakov and Paolo Bellingeri, Groups of virtual and welded links, J. Knot Theory
Ramifications 23 (2014), no. 3, 1450014, 23 pp. MR3200494 1.1
9. Valery G. Bardakov and Roman Mikhailov, On certain questions of the free group automorphisms theory, Comm. Algebra 36 (2008), no. 4, 1489–1499. MR2406602 18
10. Valery G. Bardakov, Roman Mikhailov, Vladimir Vershinin, and Jie Wu, On the pure virtual
braid group PV3 , Comm. Algebra 44 (2016), no. 3, 1350–1378. MR3463147 2, 2.3, 4.3
11. Laurent Bartholdi, Benjamin Enriquez, Pavel Etingof, and Eric Rains, Groups and Lie algebras corresponding to the Yang-Baxter equations, J. Algebra 305 (2006), no. 2, 742–764.
MR2266850 1.1, 1.2, 1, 1.3, 2.3, 2.3, 2.4, 3.1, 3, 4, 4.2, 3
12. Gilbert Baumslag, Finitely generated residually torsion-free nilpotent groups. I, J. Austral.
Math. Soc. Ser. A 67 (1999), no. 3, 289–317. MR1716698 4.3
22
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
13. Paolo Bellingeri and Arnaud Bodin, The braid group of a necklace, Math. Zeit. (to appear),
arXiv:1404.2511v3. 2.4
14. Paolo Bellingeri, Sylvain Gervais, and John Guaschi, Lower central series of Artin-Tits and
surface braid groups, J. Algebra 319 (2008), no. 4, 1409–1427. MR2383053 4.3
15. Barbu Berceanu and Ştefan Papadima, Universal representations of braid and braid-permutation groups, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 18 (2009), no. 7, 999–1019. MR2549480 1.1,
1.2, 1, 2.2, 4.3, 12, 4.3, 2
16. Stephen J. Bigelow, Braid groups are linear, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), no. 2, 471–486.
MR1815219 4.3
17. Joan S. Birman, Braids, links, and mapping class groups, Annals of Mathematics Studies,
no. 82, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1974.
MR0375281 1.1, 2.1, 2.1, 2.4
18. Tara E. Brendle and Allen Hatcher, Configuration spaces of rings and wickets, Comment.
Math. Helv. 88 (2013), no. 1, 131–162. MR3008915 1.1, 2.4
19. Kuo-Tsai Chen, Integration in free groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 54 (1951), no. 1, 147–162.
MR0042414 1.3, 4.5
20. Wei-Liang Chow, On the algebraical braid group, Ann. of Math. (2) 49, (1948), no. 3, 654–
658. MR0026050 2.1
21. Daniel C. Cohen, Resonance of basis-conjugating automorphism groups, Proc. Amer. Math.
Soc. 137 (2009), no. 9, 2835–2841. MR2506439 2, 1.3, 2.2, 3.2, 5
22. Daniel C. Cohen and Goderdzi Pruidze, Topological complexity of basis-conjugating automorphism groups, Pacific J. Math. 238 (2008), no. 2, 233–248. MR2442993 1, 2.2
23. Daniel C. Cohen and Henry K. Schenck, Chen ranks and resonance, Advances in Math. 285
(2015), 1–27. MR3406494 2, 1.3, 4.5
24. Daniel C. Cohen and Alexander I. Suciu, The Chen groups of the pure braid group, in: The
Čech centennial (Boston, MA, 1993), 45–64, Contemp. Math., vol. 181, Amer. Math. Soc.,
Providence, RI, 1995, MR1320987 2, 1.3, 4.5, 4.5
25. Daniel C. Cohen and Alexander I. Suciu, Homology of iterated semidirect products of free
groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 126 (1998), no. 1-3, 87–120. MR1600518 2.1
26. Daniel C. Cohen and Alexander I. Suciu, Alexander invariants of complex hyperplane arrangements, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351 (1999), no. 10, 4043–4067. MR1475679 1.3, 4.5
27. Daniel C. Cohen and Alexander I. Suciu, Characteristic varieties of arrangements, Math.
Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 127 (1999), no. 1, 33–53. MR1692519 2, 1.3, 3.2, 4
28. Frederick R. Cohen, Jonathan Pakianathan, Vladimir V. Vershinin, and Jie Wu, Basis-conjugating automorphisms of a free group and associated Lie algebras, in: Groups, homotopy and
configuration spaces, 147–168, Geom. Topol. Monogr., vol. 13, Geom. Topol. Publ., Coventry,
2008. MR2508204 1, 1.3, 1.3, 2.2, 2.2, 3.1, 3, 4, 4.2, 18
29. Andrew Conner and Peter Goetz, Some non-Koszul algebras from rational homotopy theory,
Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 47 (2015), no. 3, 473–482. MR3354442 1, 3.1, 4.2
30. Celeste Damiani, A journey through loop braid groups, preprint (2016),
arXiv:1605.02323v2. 1.1
31. Emily Dies and Andrew Nicas, The center of the virtual braid group is trivial, J. Knot Theory
Ramifications 23 (2014), no. 8, 1450042, 6 pp. MR3261954 2.2, 2.3
32. Alexandru Dimca, Ştefan Papadima, and Alexander I. Suciu, Topology and geometry of cohomology jump loci, Duke Math. J. 148 (2009), no. 3, 405–457. MR2527322 1.3, 3.2, 4.4,
14
33. Edward Fadell and Lee Neuwirth, Configuration spaces, Math. Scand. 10 (1962), 111–118.
MR0141126 1.1, 2.1
34. Michael Falk, Arrangements and cohomology, Ann. Comb. 1 (1997), no. 2, 135–157.
MR1629681 3.2
35. Michael Falk and Richard Randell, The lower central series of a fiber-type arrangement, Invent. Math. 82 (1985), no. 1, 77–88. MR808110 1.2, 2.1, 4, 4.2
36. Michael Falk and Richard Randell, Pure braid groups and products of free groups, in: Braids
(Santa Cruz, CA, 1986), 217–228, Contemp. Math., vol. 78, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence,
RI, 1988. MR975081 1.2, 2.1, 4.1, 8, 4.3
The pure braid groups and their relatives
23
37. Roger Fenn, Richárd Rimányi, and Colin Rourke, The braid-permutation group, Topology 36
(1997), no. 1, 123–135. MR1410467 1.1, 2.2
38. Edward Fadell and Ralph Fox, The braid groups, Math. Scand. 10 (1962), 119–126.
MR0150755 1.1
39. Eddy Godelle and Luis Paris, K(π, 1) and word problems for infinite type Artin-Tits
groups, and applications to virtual braid groups, Math. Z. 272 (2012), no. 3-4, 1339–1364.
MR2995171 3
40. Deborah L. Goldsmith, The theory of motion groups, Michigan Math. J. 28 (1981), no. 1,
3–17. MR600411 2.4
41. Evgeny A. Gorin and Vladimir Ja. Lin, Algebraic equations with continuous coefficients, and
certain questions of the algebraic theory of braids, Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 78 (120) (1969), no. 4,
579–610. MR0251712 4.3
42. Mikhail Goussarov, Michael Polyak, and Oleg Viro, Finite-type invariants of classical and
virtual knots, Topology 39 (2000), no. 5, 1045–1068. MR1763963 1.1
43. Richard M. Hain, Infinitesimal presentations of the Torelli groups, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10
(1997), no. 3, 597–651. MR1431828 1.2, 4.3, 12
44. Craig Jensen, Jon McCammond, and John Meier, The integral cohomology of the group of
loops, Geom. Topol. 10 (2006), 759–784. MR2240905 1, 1.3, 3.1, 3, 4
45. Louis H. Kauffman, Virtual knot theory, European J. Combin. 20 (1999), no. 7, 663–690.
MR1721925 1.1
46. Constantinos Kofinas, Vassilis Metaftsis, and Athanassios I. Papistas, Relatively free nilpotent torsion-free groups and their Lie algebras, Comm. Algebra 39 (2011), no. 3, 843–880.
MR2782568 4.3
47. Daan Krammer, Braid groups are linear, Ann. of Math. (2) 155 (2002), no. 1, 131–156.
MR1888796 4.3
48. Toshitake Kohno, On the holonomy Lie algebra and the nilpotent completion of the fundamental group of the complement of hypersurfaces, Nagoya Math. J. 92 (1983), 21–37. MR726138
1.2, 1, 4, 1
49. Toshitake Kohno, Série de Poincaré-Koszul associée aux groupes de tresses pures, Invent.
Math. 82 (1985), no. 1, 57–75. MR808109 1.2, 1, 4.2
50. Peter Lee, The pure virtual braid group is quadratic, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 19 (2013), no. 2,
461–508. MR3090235 1.1, 1.2, 1, 1.3, 2.3, 3.1, 3, 4, 4.2, 3
51. Wilhelm Magnus, Beziehungen zwischen Gruppen und Idealen in einem speziellen Ring,
Math. Ann. 111 (1935), no. 1, 259–280. MR1512992 1.1, 4.3
52. Anatoli I. Mal0 cev, Generalized nilpotent algebras and their associated groups, Mat. Sbornik
N.S. 25(67) (1949), no. 3, 347–366. MR0032644 4.3
53. Anatoli I. Mal0 cev, On a class of homogeneous spaces, Izvestiya Akad. Nauk. SSSR. Ser. Mat.
13 (1949), no. 1, 9–32. MR0028842 4.4
54. William S. Massey, Completion of link modules, Duke Math. J. 47 (1980), no. 2, 399–420.
MR575904 1.3, 4.5
55. Daniel Matei and Alexander I. Suciu, Cohomology rings and nilpotent quotients of real
and complex arrangements, in: Arrangements–Tokyo 1998, 185–215, Advanced Studies Pure
Math., vol. 27, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 2000. MR1796900 3.2
56. James McCool, On basis-conjugating automorphisms of free groups, Canad. J. Math. 38
(1986), no. 6, 1525–1529. MR873421 1.1, 2.2
57. Vassilis Metaftsis and Athanassios I. Papistas, On the McCool group M3 and its associated
Lie algebra, preprint (2015), arXiv:1506.06495v1. 4.3
58. Stefan Papadima and Alexander I. Suciu, Chen Lie algebras, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2004, no. 21,
1057–1086. MR2037049 1.3, 4.5
59. Stefan Papadima and Alexander I. Suciu, Homological finiteness in the Johnson filtration of
the automorphism group of a free group, J. Topol. 5 (2012), no. 4, 909–944. MR3001315 4.3
60. Stefan Papadima and Alexander I. Suciu, Jump loci in the equivariant spectral sequence,
Math. Res. Lett. 21 (2014), no. 4, 863–883. MR3275650 3.2, 3.2
61. Stefan Papadima and Sergey Yuzvinsky, On rational K[π, 1] spaces and Koszul algebras, J.
Pure Appl. Algebra 144 (1999), no. 2, 157–167. MR1731434 4.1, 9, 4.1
24
Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang
62. Daniel Quillen, Rational homotopy theory, Ann. of Math. 90 (1969), no. 2, 205–295.
MR0258031 1.2, 4.4
63. Henry K. Schenck and Alexander I. Suciu, Lower central series and free resolutions of hyperplane arrangements, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), no. 9, 3409–3433. MR1911506
1.3, 4.5
64. Brad Shelton and Sergey Yuzvinsky, Koszul algebras from graphs and hyperplane arrangements, J. London Math. Soc. 56 (1997), no. 3, 477–490. MR1610447 1, 4.1
65. Henry K. Schenck and Alexander I. Suciu, Resonance, linear syzygies, Chen groups, and
the Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand correspondence, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), no. 5,
2269–2289. MR2197444 1.3, 4.5
66. Jean-Pierre Serre, Lie algebras and Lie groups, 1964 lectures given at Harvard University.
Second edition. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1500, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.
MR1176100 4.3
67. Alexander I. Suciu, Fundamental groups of line arrangements: enumerative aspects, in: Advances in algebraic geometry motivated by physics (Lowell, MA, 2000), 43–79, Contemp.
Math., vol. 276, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001. MR1837109 1.3, 4.5
68. Alexander I. Suciu, Resonance varieties and Dwyer–Fried invariants, in: Arrangements of
Hyperplanes—Sapporo 2009, 359–398, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 62, Kinokuniya, Tokyo,
2012. MR2933803 3.2
69. Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang, Formality properties of finitely generated groups and Lie
algebras, preprint (2015), arXiv:1504.08294v2. 1.2, 1.3, 4.1, 9, 4.4
70. Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang, Pure virtual braids, resonance, and formality, preprint
(2016), arXiv:1602.04273v1. 1, 2, 1.3, 2.3, 2.3, 3.2, 7
71. Alexander I. Suciu and He Wang, Chen ranks and resonance varieties of the upper McCool
groups, preprint (2016). 1.2, 2, 1.3, 1.3, 2.2, 1, 3.2, 6, 15, 4.5, 16, 17
| 4math.GR
|
Registration and Fusion of Multi-Spectral Images Using a Novel Edge Descriptor
Nati Ofir
Shai Silberstein
Dani Rozenbaum
Sharon Duvdevani Bar
arXiv:1711.01543v4 [cs.CV] 24 Jan 2018
Abstract
In this paper we introduce a fully end-to-end approach
for multi-spectral image registration and fusion. Our
method for fusion combines images from different spectral
channels into a single fused image by different approaches
for low and high frequency signals. A prerequisite of fusion is a stage of geometric alignment between the spectral bands, commonly referred to as registration. Unfortunately, common methods for image registration of a single spectral channel do not yield reasonable results on images from different modalities. For that end, we introduce a
new algorithm for multi-spectral image registration, based
on a novel edge descriptor of feature points. Our method
achieves an accurate alignment of a level that allows us to
further fuse the images. As our experiments show, we produce a high quality of multi-spectral image registration and
fusion under many challenging scenarios.
Figure 1. Example of a multi-spectral image registration and fusion. Left: RGB image of the visible channel 0.4 − 0.7µm, contains the information about the color. Right: aligned grayscale
MWIR images 3 − 5µm, ”sees” behind the haze, captures information about the cars in the far road. Center: fused image with
the advantages of both channels, color information combines with
good visibility of far objects.
images from the same modal [25, 27] is by Scale-InvariantFeature-Transform (SIFT) [18]. Even though this method is
robust, it does not reproduce its success on images from different modalities. The reason for this failure is that the appearance of the same object, under different spectral wavelengths, varies. Since we found out that unfortunately, SIFT
descriptors are not invariant to different wavelengths, we
offer to perform registration of multi-spectral images in a
similar way, but to use instead a novel edge descriptor. Our
method detects keypoints by Harris corner detection [11]
and describes them using an edge descriptor. We measure the keypoint similarities by correlation of descriptors
and we compute the final transformation by a new variant
of Random-Sample-Consensus (RANSAC). As our experiments show, this new approach produces accurate registration results on multi-spectral images, since their edge information is indeed invariant to different wavelengths. Moreover, since measuring similarities by our edge descriptors is
fast, our scheme can be incorporated into real-time vision
systems.
1. Introduction
This paper addresses the problem of multi-spectral registration and fusion. Different spectral channels capture different scenes, therefore, their fusion is interesting, and their
registration is challenging. See Figure 1 for example, the
visible channel in wavelength 0.4 − 0.7µm, captures the
colors of the scene on the one hand, but suffers from low
visibility due to haze on the other hand. On the right, the
Middle-Wave-Infrared (MWIR) channel in wavelength of
3 − 5µm, is complementary to the visible channel. It does
not capture colors, but utilizes a good visibility even in the
presence of haze. For an example of good visibility, see the
objects in the far road, where ”hot” cars can be easily seen in
the thermal (MWIR) image. The fused image in the middle
contains the advantages of both channels: good visibility
of far distant objects combined with color information. In
this work we introduce a method for performing registration
of this kind of images, that manages to align multi-spectral
images even though their captured information is highly different. In addition, we introduce a fast method for fusion of
color-visible with IR-thermal images.
Image registration is a famous problem in computer vision with profound research. A classic way to align two
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we
cover previous work on the topics of registration and fusion. In Section 3 we introduce our method, for registration
of multi-spectral images, based on our new edge descriptor.
Then, in Section 4, we explain how to fuse two registered
images: a color image of the visible channel, and a MWIR
gray-scale image. In Section 5, we demonstrate evaluations
of the accuracy of our registration algorithm, as well as examples of fusion of images captured from different sensors.
1
2. Previous Work
Image registration is a fundamental problem in computer
vision which has been studied for decades. Image registration methods [3, 27] are being used to fuse images, for
matching stereo to recover object shape, or to produce a
wide panorama image. Early methods rely on primitive
characteristics of the images, for example, techniques that
find translation by correlation [22] of image pixels, [19]
solves registration based on the spatial intensity gradient
of the image. [23] solves translation, rotation and scale by
and FFT-based technique. More advanced methods rely on
key-points [11, 18] and invariant descriptors to find featurebased registration [25].
A distinct group of works tried to solve the problem
of image registration on images from different modalities
or spectral channels [7, 24]. In [20] registration was carried out by two medical images based on maximization of
mutual information. Since contours and gradients are invariant to different spectral images, [4, 14, 15, 16] offer
to utilize them for registration. When trying to solve only
translation, measuring correlation on Sobel image [10], or
Canny image [6] may help to register multi-modal images.
We show experimentally that our method outperforms these
approaches. Note that we align images of a wide spectral range, visible to MWIR, while other methods [4, 15]
work on a narrower range, visible to Near-Infrared (NIR).
When spectral ranges are closer, the captured images are
more similar and therefore easier to align. [1] solves registration by FAST features [26] and unique descriptors for
non linear intensity variations. [2] measures cross spectral
similarity by Convolutional-Neural-Network (CNN). They
achieve high accuracy in classification of patches as same
or different, however, their method cannot be incorporated
into a fully registration scheme due to insensitivity to slight
geometrical transformations. Our approach utilizes the fact
that edges are invariant to multi-spectral images, and use it
within a feature-based registration. Edge descriptors are effective and relevant for our purpose also because they are
sensitive to geometric transformation and since their computation is fast. In Section 3 we describe in details our novel
edge descriptor and how to use it for multi-spectral registration.
Fusion of images retrieved from different sensors is a
fundamental image processing problem addressed by many
previous works [13, 8]. The most basic group of fusion
methods, named α blending, and can be written as a linear combination, αI1 + (1 − α)I2 , where I1 , I2 are the
input images. Early methods of image fusion are based
on wavelets transform [17], or on Laplacian pyramid of an
image [5]. More advanced approaches rely on PrincipalComponent-Analysis (PCA) transform of the fused images
[21], and on Intensity-Hue-Saturation (IHS) technique [12].
In this work, we introduce a new technique named High-
Pass-Low-Pass (HPLP). This method applies different fusion techniques to the low frequency signals and the high
frequencies, it is described in details in Section 4.
3. Multi-Spectral Image Registration
The algorithm for multi-spectral image registration consists of 3 major steps: corners detection by Harris [11],
feature matching by a novel edge descriptor and iterative
Random-Sample-Consensus (RANSAC) [9] for outliers rejection.
Corners Detection. Our multi-spectral registration
scheme is based on feature-points, whereas each point is
a Harris corner [11]. This method is useful for our purpose,
since the groups of corners of the two spectral images has
a large overlap. We apply the following algorithm to detect
the corners in each spectral image.
Let I be the input image, Ix , Iy be the horizontal and vertical derivatives of I respectively. Given a Gaussian window
w compute the Harris matrix for every pixel:
XX
Ix (u, v)2
Ix (u, v)Iy (u, v)
A=
w(u, v)
Ix (u, v)Iy (u, v)
Ix (u, v)2
u
v
(1)
A corner is characterized by a large positive eigenvalues
λ1 , λ2 of the matrix A. Since the computation of exact
eigenvalues is expensive, we instead compute the corner
score: S = λ1 λ2 − k(λ1 + λ2 )2 = det(A) − k · trace2 (A),
where k is a sensitivity parameter. For every pixel x we
compute the score S to obtain a Harris score image S(x).
In practice, we apply a non-maximal-suppression by a window of size w1 × w1 , such that every corner pixel, is a local
maximum in its surrounding window in S(x).
Feature Matching by an Edge Descriptor. We describe
every corner point in one of the multi-spectral images by
a novel edge descriptor. The uniqueness of this descriptor
is its invariance over different wavelengths. Note that although the same object is acquired differently in the visible
channel and in the MWIR channel, it has high similarity
after applying our edge descriptor.
Denote by CV the set of corners in the visible image
and by CIR the corners in the MWIR image. Every point
p ∈ CV or p ∈ CIR is basically described by its center
pixel (xp , yp ). In addition, in a surrounding window of size
w2 × w2 , we compute the Canny [6] edge image Ep and
the Gradient directions Gp . Note that Ep is a binary image,
Gp is an image with indexes of directions and reasonable
results are achieved also with smaller size of window. The
whole 360o directions are quantized in Gp to k1 bins. To
conclude, the descriptor Dp of a point contains the following information: Dp = {xp , yp , Ep , Gp }.
Given two points, p ∈ CV and q ∈ CIR , we match
them according to their descriptors Dp , Dq . We first require
that the difference in the gradient direction, will be less or
equal than a single bin in any pixel x: SameGradp,q (x) =
|Gp (x)−Gq (x)|mod16 ≤ 1. Hence, the similarity measure
between p and q is the normalized correlation of the pixels
that are in the same Gradient directions:
P
Ep (x) ∧ Eq (x) ∧ SameGradp,q (x)
pP
.
Similarity(p, q) = x
x Eq (x)
(2)
Then, for every corner p ∈ CV , we iterate over all the corners q ∈ CIR and search for the match with p
theP
highest similarity. We normalize Similarity(p, q) by
x Eq (x) to
avoid high scores in cases of many edge pixels in Eq .
Iterative RANSAC. Eventually, we compute the final
transformation between the images by our iterative version of RANSAC [9]. We do so in 3 iterations, the first
one is a by applying RANSAC in the regular way as follows. We compute for each corner p ∈ CV its best match
q ∗ ∈ CIR , and thus we get a group of matches M1 . This
group contains inlier and outlier matches, therefore we apply the RANSAC outliers rejection approach. We sample
small groups of matches m1 , ..., ml , ... ∈ M1 and compute by least square the transformation Tl that best describes
these matches for every subgroup ml . Each match induces
two linear constraints and therefore if our transformation
T is characterized by n parameters, |ml | = d n2 e. Finally,
we select the best transformation T ∗ derived from the best
group of matches m∗ , that has the greatest support in the
whole group of matches M1 . The support of a transformation is the number of other matches that ”agree” with it, a
match ”agree” with a transformation if
xp
xq ∗
||T2×3 yp − yq∗ ||2 ≤ RansacDistance. (3)
1
1
The RansacDistance in the first iteration is rd1 . We denote by T1 the transformation that is found by RANSAC in
the first iteration.
In the second iteration we repeat the same process as in
the first, but with initial guess T1 . We use this initial guess
to restrict the group of all matches in the second iteration
M2 as follows. p ∈ CV can be matched to q ∈ CIR only
if their distance under T1 (similar to Eq. (3)), is less than
M atchDistance. In iteration 2, M atchDistance = md1
and RansacDistance = rd1 such that md1 < ∞. We
denote by T2 the transformation found by our iterative
RANSAC in the second iteration.
In the third and final iteration, we use T2 as initial guess and we decrease the thresholds, such that
RansacDistance = rd2 and M atchDistance = md2
such that rd2 < rd1 , md2 < md1 . Because these thresholds are relatively low, the final transformation is more accurate. Finally, we denote by T3 the transformation found
by RANSAC in the third iteration. This is the final transformation of our multi-spectral registration algorithm. Note
that we can search for different types of transformations
between the input images. Our implementation supports
searching for any type of geometric relations.
4. Fast Image Fusion
Given two registered images, a visible channel image V
and a MWIR image IR, we would like to obtain their colored fusion image Fc , which its luminance gray-scale image
is F . Since V is an RGB image, we denote by Y (V ) its luminance channel and by R(V ), G(V ), B(V ) its color channels. In this section we introduce a new fusion technique
which we call High-Pass-Low-Pass (HPLP). This method
fuses Y (V ) with IR by different approach for the lowfrequency signals in the image and for the high-frequency
signals. Then we explain how to restore the colors of V in
the fused color image Fc . Note that our fusion method is
fast and can be run in real-time algorithms easily.
Given an image I and a Gaussian kernel gσ with standard deviation of σ, we divide the image to high and low
frequencies by a simple convolution, LPσ (I) = I ∗ gσ for
low pass, and then the high-pass is HPσ (I) = I − LPσ (I).
We fuse the low-frequencies by alpha-fusion,
LPσ (F ) = α · LPσ (Y (V )) + (1 − α) · LPσ (IR).
(4)
The high-frequency image is fused by maximum criterion,
such that in each pixel we take the value of the channel with
the highest absolute value. Denote by b the indicator b =
1|HPσ (Y (V ))|≥|HPσ (IR)| , then in any pixel,
HPσ (F ) = b · HPσ (Y (V )) + (1 − b) · HPσ (IR). (5)
Now, the fused image is the low-pass plus the high-pass
times gain to emphasize sharpness, Fσ = LPσ (F )+gain×
HPσ (F ). We repeat the whole process for three levels of
σ = σ1 , σ2 , σ3 and then we fuse all the three with equal
weights, F = 31 (Fσ1 + Fσ2 + Fσ3 ).
Now that we have a gray-scale fusion of V and IR, we
would like to compute the color fusion Fc . For that end we
apply color restoration from V . Our criterion is that the folR(Fc )
G(Fc )
F
lowing ratio will be preserved, Y (V
) = R(V ) = G(V ) =
B(Fc )
B(V ) .
Therefore, the final color fusion is this ratio times
F
the input visible image, Fc = Y (V
) ·V.
5. Experiments
We tested our algorithm for multi-spectral registration
and fusion on various real images captured by multi-spectral
imaging systems. The transformation between the channels
is unknown in advance and we found it automatically by
our method to create fusion examples. We evaluated the
accuracy of our approach by creating a dataset of manuallyaligned images, and then finding a solution to a known simulated transformation. We tested our method on this dataset
Algorithm
Our method
Canny
Sobel
Mutual Information
LGHD
VIS-SWIR
0.62
2.13
3.84
1.38
24.1
VIS-MWIR
0.76
1.43
3.2
2.48
8.13
Table 1. Accuracy in pixels of multi-spectral registration when
searching for translation only. Our method is compared to correlation of Canny, correlation of Sobel, maximization of mutualinformation and LGHD. As can be seen (in bold), our approach
achieves the highest accuracy and it is the only one which is subpixel accurate (score is less than 1).
and compared it to several approaches for solving simple
multi-spectral registrations. Our registration code is written
in C++ and its runtime is less than 4 seconds on a CPU.
By utilizing parallel computing or GPU its runtime could
be dramatically decreased, even to the level of real time algorithm. Our fusion scheme is implemented in Matlab and
its runtime is negligible since it contains simple arithmetic
computations.
In Table 1 we present a comparison between our accuracy to those of correlation of Canny [6] images, correlation of Sobel [10] images and maximization of mutualinformation [20]. We also compare to [1] but this method
achieves no accurate results on our dataset. We simulated a
known translation between the channels and tested the various methods when trying to solve translation only. Eventually, we find the Euclidean distance between the known
translation to the output of each method to derive accuracy
in pixels. We repeat this test for several images and store the
mean of accuracy of all iterations. We test the performance
for visible to Short-Wave-Infrared (SWIR, 1.4 − 3µm) registration, and for visible to MWIR registration. It can be
seen that in both wavelengths we achieve the most accurate results among all the compared approaches. Moreover,
our algorithm is the only one that produces registration with
sub-pixel accuracy (its score is less that 1 pixel in both channels).
We evaluate our accuracy on different scales between
two spectral channels in Figure 2. We report the Euclidean
distance between the translation we found automatically to
the one we simulated. The same distance in the scale parameter is less than 0.001 and therefore it is negligible. It can
be seen that our accuracy is around 1 pixel, in both channels SWIR and MWIR. In addition, we maintain this level
of accuracy along all simulated scale transformations from
0.9 to 1.1.
We show an interesting example of registration and fusion in Figure 3 . We perform registration between different
spectral channels visible and MWIR, by our method. Then,
we fuse the aligned images by HPLP technique. It can be
seen that the left column contains all the information about
Figure 2. Accuracy in pixels of multi-spectral registration as a
function of scale between the images. Left: visible to SWIR registration. Right: visible to MWIR registration. The accuracy is
around 1 pixel for all scales between 0.9 to 1.1 in both graphs.
Figure 3. Example of a multi-spectral image registration and fusion. Left: RGB image of the visible channel 0.4 − 0.7µm, contains color information. Right: aligned grayscale MWIR images
3 − 5µm captures thermal information of objects. Center: fusion
image with the advantages of both channels.
Figure 4. Example of HPLP fusion captured by an aerial platform.
From left to right: visible image, MWIR image and regular HPLP
fusion.
colors of the captured objects, while the right column contains all the thermal information of the objects. The image of the ”hot” factory building demonstrates how the two
channels are naturally different. This object is very hot in
the MWIR image and yet very colorful in the visible image.
In the fused image we can see its colors together with its
brightness indicating a high temperature.
In Figure 4 we show images captured by and aerial platform. The images provide an interesting example of fusion. The visible image captures color of the clouds, but
cannot provide information beyond far distances, whereas
the MWIR image captures the far land. As can be seen, the
fusion method contains the interesting information captured
in both channels.
6. Conclusions
We introduced a novel method to register images captured by multi-spectral sensors. Our approach is feature
based and it utilizes the characteristic that edge descriptors
are invariant to different wavelengths. The multi-spectral
registration is accurate enough to allow the fusion of images. For that end we developed a new technique for fusion,
named High-Pass-Low-Pass, that fuses the images in different ways for the low and high frequencies. Our method out-
puts informative fusion results that use the benefits of both
spectral channels.
References
[1] C. Aguilera, A. D. Sappa, and R. Toledo. Lghd: A feature descriptor for matching across non-linear intensity variations.
In Image Processing (ICIP), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, page 5. IEEE, Sep 2015. 2, 4
[2] C. A. Aguilera, F. J. Aguilera, A. D. Sappa, and R. Toledo.
Learning cross-spectral similarity measures with deep convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 1–9, 2016. 2
[3] L. G. Brown. A survey of image registration techniques.
ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 24(4):325–376, 1992. 2
[4] M. Brown and S. Süsstrunk. Multispectral SIFT for scene
category recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR11), pages 177–184, Colorado Springs,
June 2011. 2
[5] P. Burt and E. Adelson. The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Transactions on communications,
31(4):532–540, 1983. 2
[6] J. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE
Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence,
(6):679–698, 1986. 2, 4
[7] C. Chen, Y. Li, W. Liu, and J. Huang. Sirf: simultaneous satellite image registration and fusion in a unified framework. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,
24(11):4213–4224, 2015. 2
[8] L. Dong, Q. Yang, H. Wu, H. Xiao, and M. Xu. High quality
multi-spectral and panchromatic image fusion technologies
based on curvelet transform. Neurocomputing, 159:268–274,
2015. 2
[9] M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image
analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the
ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981. 2, 3
[10] W. Gao, X. Zhang, L. Yang, and H. Liu. An improved sobel
edge detection. In Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT), 2010 3rd IEEE International Conference
on, volume 5, pages 67–71. IEEE, 2010. 2, 4
[11] C. Harris and M. Stephens. A combined corner and edge
detector. In Alvey vision conference, volume 15, pages 10–
5244. Manchester, UK, 1988. 1, 2
[12] C. He, Q. Liu, H. Li, and H. Wang. Multimodal medical
image fusion based on ihs and pca. Procedia Engineering,
7:280–285, 2010. 2
[13] B. Huang, H. Song, H. Cui, J. Peng, and Z. Xu. Spatial and spectral image fusion using sparse matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,
52(3):1693–1704, 2014. 2
[14] M. Irani and P. Anandan. Robust multi-sensor image alignment. In Computer Vision, 1998. Sixth International Conference on, pages 959–966. IEEE, 1998. 2
[15] Y. Keller and A. Averbuch. Multisensor image registration
via implicit similarity. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis
and machine intelligence, 28(5):794–801, 2006. 2
[16] H. Li, B. Manjunath, and S. K. Mitra. A contour-based approach to multisensor image registration. IEEE transactions
on image processing, 4(3):320–334, 1995. 2
[17] H. Li, B. Manjunath, and S. K. Mitra. Multisensor image
fusion using the wavelet transform. Graphical models and
image processing, 57(3):235–245, 1995. 2
[18] D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant
keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60:91–
110, 2004. 1, 2
[19] B. D. Lucas, T. Kanade, et al. An iterative image registration
technique with an application to stereo vision. 1981. 2
[20] F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, G. Marchal, and
P. Suetens. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE transactions on medical
imaging, 16(2):187–198, 1997. 2, 4
[21] U. Patil and U. Mudengudi. Image fusion using hierarchical
pca. In image Information Processing (ICIIP), 2011 International Conference on, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2011. 2
[22] W. K. Pratt. Correlation techniques of image registration.
IEEE transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems,
(3):353–358, 1974. 2
[23] B. S. Reddy and B. N. Chatterji. An fft-based technique
for translation, rotation, and scale-invariant image registration. IEEE transactions on image processing, 5(8):1266–
1271, 1996. 2
[24] X. Shen, L. Xu, Q. Zhang, and J. Jia. Multi-modal and multispectral registration for natural images. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 309–324. Springer, 2014.
2
[25] M. Subramanyam et al. Automatic feature based image registration using sift algorithm. In Computing Communication
& Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 2012 Third International Conference on, pages 1–5. IEEE, 2012. 1, 2
[26] G. Takacs, V. Chandrasekhar, S. Tsai, D. Chen,
R. Grzeszczuk, and B. Girod. Unified real-time tracking and recognition with rotation-invariant fast features. In
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010
IEEE Conference on, pages 934–941. IEEE, 2010. 2
[27] B. Zitova and J. Flusser. Image registration methods: a survey. Image and vision computing, 21(11):977–1000, 2003.
1, 2
| 1cs.CV
|
arXiv:1602.08307v2 [math.ST] 13 Nov 2017
A note on maximum likelihood estimation for
cubic and quartic canonical toric Del Pezzo
surfaces
Dimitra Kosta
Abstract
This article focuses on the study of algebraic statistical models corresponding to toric Del Pezzo surfaces with Du Val singularities. A closedform for the maximum likelihood estimate of algebraic statistical models
which correspond to cubic and quartic toric Del Pezzo surfaces with Du
Val singular points is given. Also, we calculate the ML degrees of some
toric Del Pezzo surfaces of degree less than or equal to six and show that
they equal the degree of the surface in all the cases but one, namely the
quintic Del Pezzo with two points of type A1 .
1
Introduction
Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) is a standard approach to parameter
estimation and inference, and a fundamental computational task in statistics.
It consists of the following problem: given the observed data and a model of
interest, find the probability distribution that is most likely to have produced the
data. In the past decade, algebraic techniques for the computation of maximum
likelihood estimates have been developed for algebraic statistical models for
discrete data (see [3], [6], [7]).
These efforts to solve the likelihood equations for algebraic statistical models
have focused on specifying the ML-degree of the corresponding models (see [3],
[6], [7] and [12]). In [7] algebraic algorithms are presented for computing all
critical points of the likelihood function, with the aim of identifying the local
maxima in the probability simplex. Using these algorithms the authors derived
an explicit formula for the ML-degree of a projective variety which is a generic
complete intersection and this formula serves as an upper bound for the MLdegree of special complete intersections. Moreover, a geometric characterisation
of the ML-degree of a smooth variety in the case when the divisor corresponding
to the rational function is a normal crossings divisor was given in [3]. In the same
The author would like to thank Ivan Cheltsov, Alexander Davie, Milena Hering, Kaie Kubjas and Bernd Sturmfels for valuable comments and suggestions. This article was completed
during a Daphne Jackson Trust Fellowship, funded jointly by EPSRC and the University of
Edinburgh.
1
paper an explicit combinatorial formula for the ML-degree of a toric variety is
derived by relaxing the restrictive smoothness assumption and allowing some
mild singularities. Also, in [8] a geometric description of all varieties with MLdegree 1 is given via Horn Uniformization, however given a variety it is hard to
tell if that variety has ML-degree 1. For an introduction to the geometry behind
the MLE for algebraic statistical models for discrete data the interested reader
is refered to [9], which includes most of the current results on the MLE problem
from the perspective of algebraic geometry as well as statistical motivation.
This article is concerned with the problem of MLE for algebraic statistical
models with singularities, in particular those which correspond to toric Del
Pezzo surfaces with Du Val singular points (also called canonical toric Del Pezzo
surfaces). The focus is not towards specifying the ML degree, but towards
providing a closed form for the maximum likelihood estimate. Throughout this
paper, we work over the field C of complex numbers. In particular we prove the
following result.
Theorem 1.1 Let Xd be a toric Del Pezzo surface of degree d with Du Val
singularities. Then there is a closed form for the unique maximum likelihood
estimate for the corresponding algebraic statistical model only in the case of a
cubic X3 and a quartic X4 toric Del Pezzo surface.
The importance of algebraic statistical models corresponding to toric varieties is due to their correspondence to log-linear models in Statistics (see [5]).
Since the seminal papers by L.A. Goodman in the 70s, log-linear models have
been widely used in statistics and areas like natural language processing when
analysing crossclassified data in multidimensional contingency tables [2].
Another reason for studying the MLE for such algebraic statistical models,
is that they correspond to singular varieties. Singularities play an important
role in statistical inference as the commonly assumed smoothness of algebraic
statistical models is very restrictive and is almost never satisfied for models of
statistical relevance (see [5, p. 100], [16]). For instance, algebraic statistical
models of binary symmetric phylogenetic three-valent trees are proven to be
Fano varieties with Gorenstein terminal singularities in [17]. Statistical applications point towards a better understanding of the MLE problem for higher
dimensional singular toric Fano models and studying the MLE problem for algebraic statistical models corresponding to toric Del Pezzo surfaces with Du Val
singular points is the natural first step.
2
Preliminaries
The relevant definitions to this problem are given in this section. In section 2.1
we introduce the reader to the MLE problem from the perspective of algebraic
geometry. In section 2.2, we define toric models following the notation used in
Chapter 1.2 of [13]. Section 2.3 serves as a brief introduction to canonical Del
2
Pezzo surfaces with a focus on the properties of the toric ones that will be used
in the proof of Theorem 1.1.
2.1
Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Consider the complex projective space Pn with coordinates (p0 , p1 , ..., pn ). In
our setting we will consider X to be a discrete random variable taking values
on the state space [n]. Then the coordinate pi represents the probability of the
i-event
pi = P (X = i),
where i = 0, · · · , n, therefore p0 + p1 + ... + pn = 1. The set of points in Pn with
positive real coefficients is identified with the probability simplex
∆n = {(p0 , p1 , ..., pn ) ∈ Rn+1 : p0 , p1 , ..., pn ≥ 0 and p0 + p1 + ... + pn = 1} .
An algebraic statistical model is a Zariski closed subset M of complex projective
space Pn , with the model itself being the intersection of M with the probability
simplex ∆n . The data is given by a non-negative integer vector (u0 , u1 , ..., un ) ∈
Nn+1 , where ui is the number of times the i-event is observed.
The maximum likelihood estimation problem consists of finding a model
point p ∈ M which maximises the likelihood of observing the data. This
amounts to maximising the corresponding likelihood function
L(p0 , p1 , ..., pn ) =
pu0 0 · pu1 1 · · · punn
(p0 + p1 + ... + pn )(u0 +u1 +...+un )
over the model M, where here we ignore a multinomial coefficient. Statistical
computations are usually implemented in the affine n-plane p0 +p1 +...+pn = 1.
However, including the denominator makes the likelihood function a well-defined
rational function on the projective space Pn , enabling one to use projective
algebraic geometry to study its restriction to the variety M.
The likelihood function might not be convex, so it can have many local
maxima and the problem of finding and certifying a global maximum is difficult. Therefore, in most recent works the problem of finding all critical points
of the likelihood function is considered, with the aim of identifying all local
maxima (see [3], [6] and [7]). This corresponds to solving a system of polynomial equations and these equations, defining the critical points of the likelihood
function L, are called likelihood equations. The number of complex solutions
to the likelihood equations equals the number of complex critical points of the
restriction of the likelihood function L to the model M, which is called the
maximum likelihood (ML) degree of the variety M.
2.2
Toric models
In this article we are studying the maximum likelihood estimation problem for
toric models which are models with a well behaved likelihood function. Toric
3
models are known as log-linear models in statistics, because the logarithms of the
probabilities are linear functions in the logarithms of the parameters θi . They
have the property that maximum likelihood estimation is a convex optimization
problem. Assuming that the parameter domain Θ is bounded, it follows that
the likelihood function has exactly one local maximum.
Let A = (aij ) be a non-negative integer d × m matrix with the property that
all column sums are equal:
d
X
ai1 =
d
X
ai2 = ... =
aim .
i=1
i=1
i=1
d
X
The j-th column vector aj of the matrix A represents the monomial
a
a
a
θaj := θ1 1j · θ2 2j · · · θd dj for all j = 1, ...m
and the assumption that the column sums of the matrix A are all equal means
these monomials all have the same degree.
Definition 2.1 The toric model of A is the image of the orthant Θ = Rd>0
under the map
1
f : Rd → Rm , θ 7→ Pm
aj
j=1 θ
· (θa1 , θa2 , ..., θam ) .
Maximum likelihood estimation for the toric model means solving the optimization problem of maximising the function
pu1 1 · pu1 2 · ... · pumm
subject to the constrains f (Rd>0 ). This is equivalent to maximising function
θA·u subject to θ ∈ Rd>0 and
where
θAu =
d
Y
m
X
θaj = 1,
j=1
θiai1 u1 +ai2 u2 +...+aim um and θaj =
d
Y
a
θi ij .
i=1
i=1
Let b := Au denote the sufficient statistic, then the optimisation problem above
is equivalent to maximising
θb subject to θ ∈ Rd>0 and
m
X
θ aj = 1 .
j=1
Then by the next Proposition [13, Proposition 1.9] we get an equation satisfied
by the local maximum.
4
Proposition 2.2 Fix a toric model A and data u ∈ Nm with sample size N =
u1 +· · ·+um and sufficient statistic b = Au. Let p̂ = f (θ̂) be any local maximum
for the equivalent optimization problems above. Then
A · p̂ =
1
· b.
N
Given a matrix A ∈ Nd×m and any vector b ∈ Rd , we consider the set
PA (b) = {p ∈ Rm : A · p =
1
· b and pj > 0 for all j}.
N
This is a relatively open polytope and Birch’s theorem [13, Theorem 1.10] below
asserts that it is either empty or meets the toric model in precisely one point.
Theorem 2.3 (Birch’s Theorem) Fix a toric model A and let u ∈ Nm
>0 be a
strictly positive data vector with sufficient statistic b = Au. The intersection of
the polytope PA (b) with the toric model f (Rd>0 ) consists of precisely one point.
That point is the maximum likelihood estimate p̂ for the data u.
2.3
Del Pezzo surfaces
This section aims to provide a brief introduction to Del Pezzo surfaces with the
reader being referred to [4] for a more detailed study of this classical subject
of algebraic geometry. In particular, we are focusing on the characterisation of
toric Del Pezzo surfaces with Du Val singularities in terms of their polytopes
which will be used in the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Del Pezzo surfaces were named after the Italian mathematician Pasquale Del
Pezzo who encountered this class of surfaces when studying surfaces of degree d
embedded in Pd . They are two dimensional examples of Fano varieties, a class
of varieties with ample anticanonical divisor class which have been extensively
studied in birational geometry in the context of the minimal model program
(see [10]).
Definition 2.4 A complex projective algebraic surface X with ample anticanonical divisor class −KX is called a Del Pezzo surface.
2
The self-intersection number KX
of the canonical class of the Del Pezzo
surface is called the degree d of the Del Pezzo surface X. Often Del Pezzo
surfaces are assumed to be smooth, but here our Del Pezzo surfaces are allowed
to have mild singularities and, in particular, at most Du Val singularities.
Definition 2.5 A point P of a normal surface X is called a Du Val singularity
if there exists a minimal resolution π : X̃ → X such that KX̃ · Ei = 0 for every
exceptional curve Ei ⊂ X̃.
Every Del Pezzo surface is either a product of two projective lines P1 × P1
(with d=8), or the blow-up of a projective plane in 9 − d points with no three
5
collinear, no six on a conic, and no eight of them on a cubic having a node at one
of them. Conversely any blowup of the plane in points satisfying these conditions
is a Del Pezzo surface. In dimension two, the class of Du Val singularities is
the same as the class of canonical singularities firstly introduced by M. Reid
(see [14]), although this is not the case in higher dimensions. This is why we
refer to Del Pezzo surfaces with Du Val singularities also as canonical Del Pezzo
surfaces.
Toric Del Pezzo surfaces correspond to certain convex lattice polytopes
whose boundary lattice points are dictated by the singularities involved. In
particular, the corresponing polytope of a toric Del Pezzo surface with Du Val
singularities is a reflexive polytope. According to the classification results of
reflexive polytopes (see [11], [15]), we have the following.
Proposition 2.6 There are exactly 16 isomorphism classes of two-dimensional
reflexive polytopes given in the list bellow. The number in the labels is the number
of lattice points on the boundary.
Table 1: Two-dimensional reflexive polytopes
6
3
Main Calculation
In this section we determine a closed form for the maximum likelihood estimates
of all algebraic statistical models corresponding to cubic (d=3) and quartic
(d=4) toric Del Pezzo surfaces with Du Val singularities. In each case we will
explain how one can detect the type and number of singular points from the
corresponding polytope.
3.1
Cubic Del Pezzo with three singular points of type A2
Consider the case of a reflexive polytope in Z2 with three lattice points (1, 0),
(0, 1) and (−1, −1) on the boundary, as in the graph below.
By computing the normal fan we see its minimal generators span a sublattice of
index 3 in Z2 . This corresponds to a cubic surface with three Du Val singular
points of type A2 . Another way to see this is by using the characters coming from
the lattice points of the polygon. The corresponding toric variety is isomorphic
to the cubic surface with three double points of type A2 and equation S3 :
p34 − p1 p2 p3 = 0 in P3 .
This polytope generated by the lattice points (1, 0), (0, 1), (−1, −1) in Z2
gives rise to the same projective toric variety as the polytope which is generated
by the lattice points (2, 1, 0), (1, 2, 0), (0, 0, 3), (1, 1, 1) in Z3 .
We are interested in the algebraic statistical model given by the matrix
2 1 0 1
A = 1 2 0 1 .
0 0 3 1
This non-negative integer matrix A corresponds to the map
f : C3 → C3 , (θ1 , θ2 , θ3 ) 7→
(θ12 θ2 , θ1 θ22 , θ33 , θ1 θ2 θ3 )
2
(θ1 θ2 + θ1 θ22 + θ33 + θ1 θ2 θ3 )
.
According then to Birch’s theorem there is a unique maximum likelihood
estimate p̂ for the data u = (u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 ) with N = u1 + u2 + u3 + u4 . This
unique MLE satisfies the equation
A · p̂ =
1
·A·u ,
N
7
where N = u1 + u2 + u3 + u4 and p̂ is the probability distribution corresponding
to the parameter values (θ̂1 , θ̂2 , θ̂3 ). This gives us the equations
1
(3u1 + u4 )
N
1
3p̂2 + p̂4 =
(3u2 + u4 )
N
1
3p̂3 + p̂4 =
(3u3 + u4 ) .
N
s
s
2
p
p2 √
We then compute (θ̂1 , θ̂2 , θ̂3 ) = ( 3 1 , 3 2 , 3 p3 ), where each pk , k = 1, 2, 3 is
p2
p1
given by a cubic equation
3p̂1 + p̂4
=
N − 28(3uk + u4 ) 2
p̂k
28N
(ui − uk )(uj − uk ) − 9(3uk + u4 )2
(3uk + u4 )3
+
p̂
−
=0
k
28N 2
28N 3
p̂3k −
for i, j, k = 1, 2, 3 and i 6= j 6= k.
3.2
Quartic Del Pezzo with fourA1 type singular points.
Consider the reflexive polytope with four lattice points on the boundary, as in
the graph below.
If we compute the normal fan, we see that it corresponds to a quartic surface
with four Du Val singular points of type A1 . Another way to see this, is by
using the characters coming from the lattice points of the polygon. Then the
corresponding projective toric variety is isomorphic to a quartic surface. This
is the complete intersection of the two quadric equations S4 : p1 p4 − p25 =
p2 p3 − p25 = 0 in P4 , which has four double points of type A1 . The polytope
generated by the lattice points (1, 0), (0, 1), (0, −1), (−1, 0) ∈ Z2 gives rise to
the same projective toric variety as the polytope generated by the lattice points
(2, 1, 0), (1, 2, 0), (1, 0, 2), (0, 1, 2), (1, 1, 1) in Z3 .
The non-negative integer matrix
2 1 1 0 1
A = 1 2 0 1 1
0 0 2 2 1
8
corresponds to the map
f : C3 → C4 , (θ1 , θ2 , θ3 ) 7→
(θ12 θ2 , θ1 θ22 , θ1 θ32 , θ2 θ32 , θ1 θ2 θ3 )
.
(θ12 θ2 + θ1 θ22 + θ1 θ32 + θ2 θ32 )
According to Birch’s theorem there is a unique maximum likelihood estimate θ̂
for the data u = (u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 , u5 ) which satisfies the equation
A · p̂ =
1
·A·u ,
N
where N = u1 + u2 + u3 + u4 + u5 and p̂ is the probability distribution corresponding to the parameter values (θ̂1 , θ̂2 , θ̂3 ). This gives us the equations
p̂1 − p̂4
=
p̂2 − p̂3
=
2p̂3 + 2p̂4 − p̂5
=
1
(u1 − u4 )
N
1
(u2 − u3 )
N
1
(2u3 + 2u4 − u5 ).
N
Then
s the
s unique
s maximum likelihood estimate θ̂ for the data u is (θ̂1 , θ̂2 , θ̂3 ) =
2
2
p̂
p̂
p̂35
( 3 1, 3 2, 3
), where p̂1 , p̂2 , p̂5 are given by the quartic equations below
p̂2
p̂1
p̂1 p̂2
and
and
h
(2u1 + 2u2 + u5 )(2u1 + 2u3 + u5 ) i2
4N + (u1 − u4 )
p̂1 +
p̂21 −
N
N2
h
ih
(u1 − u4 )p̂1
2N + 2(u1 − u4 ) i2
− p̂21 −
=0
4p̂1 −
N
N
h
4N + (u2 − u3 )
(2u1 + 2u2 + u5 )(2u2 + 2u4 + u5 ) i2
p̂22 −
p̂2 +
N
N2
ih
h
2N
+
2(u
−
u3 ) i 2
(u
−
u
)p̂
2
2
3
2
4p̂2 −
=0
− p̂22 −
N
N
h
(2u1 + 2u2 + u5 )(2u3 + 2u4 + u5 )
p̂25 − 2p̂5 +
N2
(2u1 − 2u4 )(N + u2 − u3 ) i2
(u1 − u4 )
+
− (2 − 2p̂5 )2 [
+ 4p̂25 ] = 0
2
N
N2
3.3
Quartic Del Pezzo with one A2 and two A1 type singular points
Consider the case of a reflexive polytope with four lattice points on the boundary. By using the characters coming from the lattice points of the polygon,
9
the corresponding toric variety is isomorphic to a quartic surface. This is the
′′
complete intersection of two quadrics S4 : p1 p3 − p2 p5 = p2 p4 − p25 = 0 in P4 ,
which has one A2 and two A1 type singular points.
The polytope generated by the lattice points (1, 0), (0, 1), (−1, 1), (0, −1) in
Z2 gives rise to the same projective toric variety as the polytope generated by
the lattice points (2, 1, 0), (1, 2, 0), (0, 2, 1), (1, 0, 2), (1, 1, 1) in Z3 .
The non-negative integer matrix
2 1
A = 1 2
0 0
0 1
2 0
1 2
corresponds to the map
f : C3 → C4 , (θ1 , θ2 , θ3 ) 7→
1
1
1
(θ12 θ2 , θ1 θ22 , θ22 θ3 , θ1 θ32 , θ1 θ2 θ3 )
.
(θ1 θ32 + θ22 θ3 + θ1 θ22 + θ12 θ2 + θ1 θ2 θ3 )
According to Birch’s theorem there is a unique maximum likelihood estimate
θ̂ for the data u = (u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 , u5 ) which satisfies the equation
A · p̂ =
1
·A·u ,
N
where N = u1 + u2 + u3 + u4 + u5 and p̂ is the probability distribution corresponding to the parameter values (θ̂1 , θ̂2 , θ̂3 ).
This gives us the equations
p̂1 + 2p̂4 + p̂5
=
p̂2 − 3p̂4 − p̂5
=
p̂3 + 2p̂4 + p̂5
=
1
(u1 + 2u4 + u5 )
N
1
(u2 − 3u4 − u5 )
N
1
(u3 + 2u4 + u5 ) .
N
Then the unique maximum likelihood estimate θ̂ for the data u is (θ̂1 , θ̂2 , θ̂3 ) =
10
(
s
3
p̂21
,
p̂2
s
3
p̂22
,
p̂1
s
3
p̂35
), where p̂1 is given by the quartic equation below
p̂1 p̂2
h
4(3u1 + 2u2 + u5 ) − 6(u1 − u3 )
(u1 − u3 )2 ih
16p̂2
9p̂22 +
p̂2 +
N
N2
i
h
6(3u1 + 2u2 + u5 ) − 9(u1 − u3 ) 2
− 33p̂22
+
N
23(3u1 + 2u2 + u5 ) − 43(u1 − u3 ) + (u1 + u2 − u4 )
+
p̂2
N
2 i2
(3u3 + 2u2 + u5 )
=0
+
N2
p̂2 is given by the quartic equation
h
(3u1 + 2u2 + u5 )2 ih
8(u1 − u3 ) − 6(3u1 + 2u2 + u5 )
19p̂1
p̂1 +
p̂21 +
N
N2
2(u1 + u2 − u4 ) − 7(3u1 + 2u2 + u5 ) i2 h 2
− 3p̂1
+
N
12(u1 − u3 ) − 8(3u1 + 2u2 + u5 ) − 6(u1 + u2 − u4 )
+
p̂1
N
(3u3 + 2u2 + u5 )2 + 2(3u3 + 2u2 + u5 )(u1 + u2 − u4 ) i2
=0
+
N2
and the probability distribution p̂5 is given by the quartic equation
a5 p̂45 + b5 p̂35 + c5 p̂25 + d5 p̂5 + e5 = 0
where
a5
= 51
b5
c4
= −35(u + v + w) − 4v
= (u + v + w)(9u + 36v + w) + 75uw − 8v 2
d4
e4
with u =
3.4
= −3(u + v + w)[12uw + (6v + 6w + 4v)v] − 3uvw
= 3uw[9uw + (6u + 6w + 4v)v] ,
u1 +2u4 +u5
,
N
v=
u3 +2u4 +u5
N
and w =
u2 −3u4 −u5
.
N
Quartic Del Pezzo surface with one A3 and two A1 type
singular points.
Consider the case of a reflexive polytope with four lattice points on the boundary, as in the graph below.
11
We use the characters coming from the lattice points of the polygon. Then
the corresponding toric variety is isomorphic to a quartic surface, which is the
′′′
complete intersection of two quadrics S4 : p2 p4 − p23 = p1 p3 − p25 = 0 in P4 ,
which has one A3 and two A1 type singular points. We can see that the polytope
generated by the lattice points (1, 1), (0, 1), (−1, 1) and (0, −1) in Z2 gives rise
to the same projective toric variety as the polytope generated by the lattice
points (1, 0, 3), (2, 2, 0), (1, 2, 1), (0, 2, 2), (1, 1, 2) in Z3 .
The non-negative integer matrix
1 2 1 0 1
A = 0 2 2 2 1
3 0 1 2 2
gives the map
f : C3 → C4 , (θ1 , θ2 , θ3 ) 7→
(θ1 θ33 , θ12 θ22 , θ1 θ22 θ3 , θ22 θ32 , θ1 θ2 θ32 )
.
(θ1 θ33 + θ12 θ22 + θ1 θ22 θ3 + θ22 θ32 )
According to Birch’s theorem there is a unique maximum likelihood estimate
θ̂ for the data u = (u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 , u5 ) which satisfies the equation
A · p̂ =
1
·A·u ,
N
where N = u1 + u2 + u3 + u4 + u5 and p̂ is the probability distribution corresponding to the parameter values (θ̂1 , θ̂2 , θ̂3 ).
This gives us the equations
p̂1 − p̂4
=
2p̂2 + p̂4 + p̂5
=
2p̂3 + p̂5
=
1
(u1 − u4 )
N
1
(2u2 + u4 + u5 )
N
1
(2u3 + u5 ) .
N
We can compute the unique maximum likelihood estimate θ̂ for the data u,
which is
s
p̂2 4 p̂25
θ̂1 =
p̂3 p̂2
s
p̂3
θ̂2 = p̂3 4 26
p̂5
s
p̂2
θ̂3 = 4 5 ,
p̂2
where p̂2 is given by the quartic equation
−40p̂42 + (76w − 92u + 16v)p̂32 + [ − 4u2 + 4(u − w)(3w − 5u + 2v)
− 2(w + v − u)2 ]p̂22 + [(w − u)(w + v − u) − 2u2 (3u + v − w)]p̂2 + u4 = 0 ,
12
where p̂3 is given by the quartic equation
10p̂43 − 2(10u + 3v + 2w)p̂33 + [6u2 + (4u + v)(3u + v + w)]p̂23
− u2 (7u + 2v + w)p̂3 + u4 = 0 ,
and p̂5 is given by the quartic equation
5p̂45 + (6v + 4w)p̂35 + [6u2 + (2v − 4u)(v + w)]p̂25 + [ − 4u3
− 2v(u2 + 2uv + 2wu)]p̂5 + [u4 + 2uv(uv + wu)] = 0
with u =
3.5
2u3 +u5
,
N
v=
u1 −u4
N
and w =
2u2 +u4 +u5
.
N
Toric Del Pezzo surfaces of degree greater than five.
When the degree of the Del Pezzo surface is greater than or equal to five, each
of the defining equations of the probability distribution (p̂1 , p̂2 , p̂3 , · · · p̂n ) satisfy
an equation of degree five or higher. By the Abel-Ruffini theorem there is no
algebraic solution for a general polynomial equation of degree five or higher,
therefore one cannot obtain a closed form solution for the maximum likelihood
estimate in these cases.
Also, Table 2 provides a list of the ML degrees of toric Del Pezzo surfaces
of degree up to six using Macaulay2 and Algorithm 6 in Section 4 of [7].
Already for the case of a septic Del Pezzo surface corresponding to the
reflexive polytope 7a in Table 1, the memory of a Dell laptop with 2.4 GHz
Intel Core i5 processor was not sufficient for the computation to be completed.
However, the results described in Table 2 are in accordance with [9, Theorem
3.2], which states that the ML degree of a projective toric variety is bounded
above by its degree. The cubic and quartic Del Pezzo surfaces in Table 2 are
complete intersections and have ML degree which equals the degree of the Del
Pezzo surface. It is known, that Del Pezzo surfaces of degree greater than or
equal to five are no longer complete intersections (see [4]). We see in Table 2
that the ML degree drops to three in the case of a quintic Del Pezzo surface S5
corresponding to the reflexive polytope 5b in Table 1.
The natural next step is to consider the maximum likelihood estimation
problem for scaled toric Del Pezzo surfaces which give different embeddings
of isomorphic Del Pezzo surfaces in projective space and compute their ML
degrees, as is the line of research in [1].
The author would like to thank the referees for their useful comments and
suggestions which greatly improved this paper.
References
[1] C. Amendola, N. Bliss, I. Burke, C. R. Gibbons, M. Helmer, S. Hosten,
E. D. Nash, J. I. Rodriguez, D. Smolkin, The maximum likelihood degree
of toric varieties, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.02251.pdf.
13
Ideal of some degree d Del Pezzo Sd
p34
S3 : p 1 p 2 p 3 −
S4 : p1 p4 − p25 , p2 p3 − p1 p4
′
S4 : p2 p4 − p3 p5 , p1 p3 − p25
′′
S4 : p2 p4 − p23 , p1 p3 − p25
S5 : p3 p5 − p4 p6 , p2 p5 − p26 , p2 p4 − p3 p6
p1 p4 − p26 , p1 p3 − p2 p6
′
S5 : p3 p5 − p4 p6 , p2 p5 − p26 , p2 p4 − p3 p6
p1 p4 − p2 p6 , p22 − p1 p3
S6 : p4 p6 − p5 p7 , p3 p6 − p27 , p2 p6 − p1 p7
p3 p5 − p4 p7 , p2 p5 − p27 , p1 p5 − p6 p7
p2 p4 − p3 p7 , p1 p4 − p27 , p1 p3 − p2 p7
′
S6 : p 5 p 6 − p 1 p 7 , p 4 p 6 − p 2 p 7 , p 3 p 5 − p 4 p 7
p2 p5 − p27 , p2 p4 − p3 p7 , p1 p4 − p27
p1 p3 − p2 p7 , p22 − p3 p6 , p1 p2 − p6 p7
′′
S6 : p26 − p5 p7 , p4 p6 − p3 p7 , p3 p6 − p2 p7
p4 p5 − p2 p7 , p3 p5 − p2 p6 , p2 p4 − p1 p7
p23 − p1 p7 , p2 p3 − p1 p6 , p22 − p1 p5
′′′
S6 : p26 − p5 p7 , p5 p6 − p4 p7 , p3 p6 − p2 p7
p25 − p4 p6 , p3 p5 − p2 p6 , p3 p4 − p2 p5
p23 − p1 p6 , p2 p3 − p1 p5 , p22 − p1 p4
ML-degree
3
4
4
4
3
5
6
6
6
6
Table 2: ML degree of some Del Pezzo surfaces
[2] Y. M. Bishop, S. E. Fienberg and P. W. Holland, Discrete Multivariate
Analysis: Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag (2007), New York.
[3] F. Catanese, S. Hosten, A. Khetan and B. Sturmfels, The Maximum likelihood degree, American Journal of Mathematics, 18 (2006), 671-697.
[4] I. V. Dolgachev, Del Pezzo surfaces in Classical Algebraic Geometry: A
Modern View, Cambridge University Press (2012), 347-425.
[5] M. Drton, B. Sturmfels, S. Sullivant, Lectures on Algebraic Statistics, Oberwolfach Seminars, 39 (2008), Birkhuser, Basel.
[6] J. D. Hauenstein, J. Rodriguez, and B. Sturmfels, Maximum likelihood for
matrices with rank constraints, Journal of Algebraic Statistics, 5 (2014),
18-38.
[7] S. Hosten, A. Khetan and B. Sturmfels, Solving the likelihood equations,
Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 5 (2005), 389-407.
[8] J. Huh, Varieties with maximum likelihood degree one, Journal of Algebraic
Statistics, 5 (2014), 1-17.
14
[9] J. Huh, B. Sturmfels, Likelihood Geometry in Combinatorial Algebraic
Geometry, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 2108 (2014), 63-117.
[10] J. Kollár, Minimal models of algebraic threefolds: Mori’s program, Astrisque 177 (1989), 303-326.
[11] M. Kreuzer, H. Skarke, On the classification of reflexive polyhedra, Commun. Math. Phys. 185 (1997) 495-508.
[12] S. Lin, B. Sturmfels, and Z. Xu, Marginal Likelihood Integrals for Mixtures
of Independence Models, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10 (2009),
1611-1631.
[13] L. Pachter and B. Sturmfels, Algebraic Statistics for Computational Biology,
(2005) Cambridge University Press, New York.
[14] M. Reid, Canonical 3-folds, Journées de Géometrie Algébrique dAngers,
Juillet 1979/Algebraic Geometry, Angers, 1979, Sijthoff & Noordhoff,
Alphen aan den Rijn (1980), 273-310.
[15] H. Sato, Toward the classification of higher-dimensional Fano varieties, Tohoku Math. J., 52 (2000), 383-413.
[16] B. Sturmfels, Open problems in Algebraic Statistics, In ”Emerging Applications of Algebraic Geometry”, I.M.A. Volumes in Mathematics and its
Applications, 149 (2009), Springer, New York, 351-364.
[17] W. Buczynska, J. Wisniewski, On the geometry of binary symmetric models
of phylogenetic trees, J. Euro. Math. Society, 9 (2007), no. 3, 609-635.
Dimitra Kosta
School of Mathematics and Statistics,
University of Glasgow,
Glasgow G12 8SQ, UK.
[email protected]
15
| 10math.ST
|
arXiv:1506.01074v3 [math.GR] 11 Mar 2016
Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science
DMTCS vol. 18:3, 2016, #1
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer
procedure
J. Almeida1∗
1
2
3
J. C. Costa2†
M. Zeitoun3‡
Centro de Matemática e Departamento de Matemática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Portugal
Centro de Matemática e Departamento de Matemática e Aplicações, Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Univ. Bordeaux, LaBRI, UMR 5800, F-33400 Talence, France
received 4th June 2015, accepted 2nd Feb. 2016.
We consider implicit signatures over finite semigroups determined by sets of pseudonatural numbers. We prove that,
under relatively simple hypotheses on a pseudovariety V of semigroups, the finitely generated free algebra for the
largest such signature is closed under taking factors within the free pro-V semigroup on the same set of generators.
Furthermore, we show that the natural analogue of the Pin-Reutenauer descriptive procedure for the closure of a
rational language in the free group with respect to the profinite topology holds for the pseudovariety of all finite
semigroups. As an application, we establish that a pseudovariety enjoys this property if and only if it is full.
Keywords: pseudovariety, profinite semigroup, profinite topology, topological closure, unary implicit signature, pure
implicit signature, rational language, aperiodic semigroup, Burnside pseudovariety, factorial pseudovariety, full pseudovariety, Pin-Reutenauer procedure
1 Introduction
Context and motivations. This paper deals with the computation of the closure of a given rational
language within a relatively free algebra, with respect to a suitable implicit signature and a profinite
topology. A motivation for this line of research is the separation problem, which, given two rational
languages K and L, asks whether there is a rational language from a fixed class C containing K and
disjoint from L. The separation problem has several motivations. First, the membership problem for C
reduces to the separation problem for C, since a language belongs to the class C if and only if it is separable
from its complement by a language from C.
∗ Work partially supported by CMUP (UID/MAT/ 00144/2013), which is funded by FCT (Portugal) with national (MCTES) and
European structural funds (FEDER), under the partnership agreement PT2020.
† Work supported, in part, by the European Regional Development Fund, through the program COMPETE, and by the Portuguese
Government through FCT, under the project PEst-OE/MAT/UI0013/2014.
‡ Work carried out with financial support from the French State, managed by the French National Research Agency (ANR) in the
frame of ANR 2010 BLAN 0202 01 FREC and of the "Investments for the future" Programme IdEx Bordeaux – CPU (ANR-10IDEX-03-02).
ISSN 1365–8050
c 2016 by the author(s)
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
Furthermore, solving this problem gives more information about the class under investigation, and is
more robust when applying transformations to the class. For instance, is was proved by Steinberg (2001)
and Place and Zeitoun (2015) that the classical operator V 7→ V ∗ D on pseudovarieties preserves decidability of the separation problem, while it has been shown by Auinger (2010) that it does not preserve
decidability of the membership problem (on the other hand, the status with respect to separation is unknown for other operators that do not preserve the decidability of membership, such as the power, as
shown by Auinger and Steinberg (2003)).
Finally, deciding separation for some class can be used to decide membership for more involved classes:
this is for instance a generic result in the quantifier alternation hierarchy, established by Place and Zeitoun
(2014a), that deciding separation at level Σn in this hierarchy entails a decision procedure for membership
at level Σn+1 .
Almeida (1999) has related the separation problem with a purely topological question, which is the
main topic of this paper: the separation problem has a negative answer on an instance K, L of rational
languages if and only if the closures of K and L in a suitable relatively free profinite semigroup, which
depends on the class of separator languages we started from, have a nonempty intersection. Determining
whether such closures intersect can be in turn reformulated in terms of computation of pointlike twoelement sets in a given semigroup.
Deciding whether closures of rational languages intersect is often nontrivial, in particular because the
profinite semigroup in question is uncountable in general. Yet, several classes of languages enjoy a property called reducibility(i) that states that the closures of two rational languages intersect in the suitable
relatively free profinite semigroup if and only if their traces in a more manageable universe also intersect.
This more manageable universe may in particular be countable, and is therefore amenable to algorithmic
treatment. In summary, reducibility is a property of the class of separators under investigation (or of the
class of semigroups recognizing these separators), which reduces the search of a witness in the intersection
into a simpler universe.
The most important example from the historical point of view is the class of languages recognized by
finite groups. In this case, the relatively free algebra is the free group over some set X of generators,
which is indisputably much better understood than the free profinite group over X. In particular, it is
countable. Since it is known that the closures in the free profinite group of two rational languages intersect
if and only if their traces in the free group also intersect (that is, the class of finite groups enjoys the
reducibility property), this justifies the quest for an algorithm computing the closure in the free group of
a rational language. Such an algorithm is known as the Pin-Reutenauer procedure, which we describe
below, and has been developed along a successful line of research, see the work of Pin and Reutenauer
(1991); Pin (1991); Ash (1991); Henckell et al. (1991); Ribes and Zalesskiı̆ (1993); Herwig and Lascar
(2000); Auinger (2004); Auinger and Steinberg (2005). As a consequence, the separation problem by
group languages is decidable.
This framework can be generalized to classes consiting of other types of semigroups than just groups.
Denote by κ the signature consisting of the binary multiplication and the unary (ω − 1)-power, with their
usual interpretation in profinite semigroups. Note that the set of all κ-terms over X is isomorphic to the
free group over X: the mapping sending each generator to itself and xω−1 to x−1 , the inverse of x in the
free group, can be extended to a group isomorphism. More generally, given a pseudovariety V of finite
semigroups, consider the semigroup ΩκX V, which can be seen as the set of all interpretations over V of
(i)
More precisely and technically, reducibility for 2-pointlike sets.
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
3
κ-terms over X. This subalgebra of the pro-V semigroup over X is countable and thus, as said above,
amenable to algorithmic treatment. One central problem in this context is the κ-word problem: given two
κ-terms over X, decide whether they represent the same element in the relatively free profinite semigroup
in the pseudovariety under consideration. This problem has already been investigated for several classical
pseudovarieties besides that of finite groups, for instance by Almeida (1991, 1995) for the pseudovariety
J of all finite J-trivial semigroups, by Almeida and Zeitoun (2004, 2007) for the pseudovariety R of all
finite R-trivial semigroups, by Costa (2001) for the pseudovariety LSl of all finite semigroups whose local
monoids are semilattices and by Moura (2011) for the pseudovariety DA of all finite semigroups whose
regular J-classes are aperiodic semigroups. Moreover, reducibility has been shown to hold for several
pseudovarieties, in particular by Almeida (2002) for J, by Almeida et al. (2005) for R, by Costa and
Teixeira (2004) for LSl and, as already mentioned, by Ash (1991); Almeida and Steinberg (2000a) for
the pseudovariety G of all finite groups. A further example is the pseudovariety A of aperiodic languages
which, in a forthcoming paper, will be derived from the work of Henckell (1988), recently revisited by
Place and Zeitoun (2014b, 2016), from which one can derive reducibility of this class. In other words, for
these classes of languages, the separation problem reduces to testing that the intersection of the closures
of two given rational languages in the suitable countable relatively free algebra is empty. This motivates
designing algorithms to compute closures of rational languages in these relatively free algebras. This is
one of the main contributions of this paper.
The Pin-Reutenauer procedure. In the core of the paper, we investigate how the profinite closure of
rational languages in free unary algebras interacts with concatenation and iteration. The natural guide for
this work is provided by a procedure proposed by Pin and Reutenauer (1991) for the case of the free group.
This procedure gives a way to compute a representation of the closure of a rational language inductively
on the structure of the rational expression. Of course, the closure of a union is the union of the closures.
The other two rules of the Pin-Reutenauer procedure deal with concatenation and iteration. For instance,
when computing in ΩκX V, the smallest subalgebra of the pro-V semigroup closed under multiplication and
(ω − 1)-power, establishing the Pin-Reutenauer procedure amounts to showing the following equalities:
KL = K L,
L+ = hLiκ ,
where L is the topological closure of L in ΩκX V, and hLiκ is the subalgebra of ΩκX V generated by L. Notice that these equalities yield a recursive procedure to compute a finite algebraic representation of L when
L is rational. Such a finite representation may not immediately yield algorithms to decide membership
in L for a given rational language L, but it reduces the problem of computing topological closures L to
the problem of computing algebraic closures hLiκ . Since the signature κ is finite, this representation also
provides a recursive enumeration of elements of L. Additionally, assume that the following two properties
hold:
(1) the word problem for κ-terms over V is decidable,
(2) the pseudovariety V is κ-reducible.
Then one can decide the separation problem of two rational languages K, L by a V-recognizable language.
Indeed, Almeida (1999) has shown that this problem is equivalent to checking whether the closures of K
4
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
and L in ΩX V intersect, which by reducibility is equivalent to checking whether K ∩ L 6= ∅. In turn, this
may be tested by running two semi-algorithms in parallel:
(1) one that enumerates elements of K and L and checks, using the solution over V of the word problem
for κ-terms, whether there is some common element;
(2) another one that enumerates all potential V-recognizable separators.
Thus, the Pin-Reutenauer procedure is one of the ingredients to understand why a given class has decidable
separation problem.
Contributions. It has been established recently by Almeida et al. (2014) that The Pin-Reutenauer procedure holds for a number of pseudovarieties. However, the results of this paper rely on independent,
technically nontrivial results for the pseudovariety A of aperiodic semigroups: first, it was proved that
the Pin-Reutenauer procedure is valid for A using the solution of the word problem for the free aperiodic
κ-algebra given by McCammond (2001); Huschenbett and Kufleitner (2014); Almeida et al. (2015). Then,
a transfer result was established to show that it is also valid for subpseudovarieties of A.
In this paper, we revisit the Pin-Reutenauer procedure, obtaining general results with simpler arguments. We consider unary signatures, made of multiplication and operations of arity 1. Our main result,
Theorem 3.1, establishes that the Pin-Reutenauer procedure holds for the pseudovariety S of all finite
semigroups, for unary signatures satisfying an additional technical condition, which is met for κ. The
fact that rational languages are involved is crucial, since, as observed by Almeida et al. (2014, p. 10), the
equality KL = K · L fails for some languages K, L ⊆ X + , where closures are taken with respect to S
and the signature κ.
This result is obtained by first investigating a property named factoriality. Factoriality of V with respect
to, say, the signature κ means that ΩκX V is closed under taking factors in ΩX V. It was shown by Almeida
et al. (2014) that if V is factorial, then the Pin-Reutenauer procedure holds with respect to concatenation,
that is, KL = K L for arbitrary K, L (not just for rational ones). However, it was also noted that the
pseudovariety S cannot be factorial for nontrivial countable signatures, such as κ. In contrast, we show
that any nontrivial pseudovariety of semigroups V closed under concatenation is factorial for the signature
1 consisting of multiplication and all unary operations. As an application, we obtain a new proof that the
minimum ideal of the free pro-V semigroup on at least two generators contains no 1-word. This property
is a weaker version of a result obtained by Almeida and Volkov (2006). Besides the independent interest
of such results, the technical tool used to prove them, named factorization history, is also the key to
establish that the Pin-Reutenauer is valid for S. We further characterize pseudovarieties in which the PinReutenauer procedure holds in terms of an abstract property named fullness, introduced by Almeida and
Steinberg (2000a). The main idea is that the validity of the Pin-Reutenauer procedure for a pseudovariety
V is inherited by a subpseudovariety W, as established by Almeida et al. (2014), provided both V and W
are full. Conversely, we prove that if the Pin-Reutenauer procedure works for V, then V is full. Since the
pseudovariety of all finite semigroups is full, this yields that a pseudovariety enjoys the Pin-Reutenauer
property if and only if it is full.
Finally, we show that a variation of the Pin-Reutenauer procedure, known to hold in the case of all
groups, also holds for pseudovarieties of groups in which every finitely generated subgroup of the free
κ-algebra is closed.
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
5
Organization. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the notion of history of
a factorization and we show that any nontrivial pseudovariety closed under concatenation product is 1factorial. In Section 3, we establish that the Pin-Reutenauer property holds for S and unary signatures
satisfying an additional condition. In Section 4, we relate the Pin-Reutenauer property with fullness, in
the general case and in the case of pseudovarieties of groups.
2 1-factoriality
We assume that the reader has some familiarity with profinite semigroups. For details, we refer the reader
to the books of Almeida (1995); Rhodes and Steinberg (2009) and to the article of Almeida (2005). Here,
we briefly introduce the required notation and key notions.
Preliminaries. Throughout the paper, we work with a finite alphabet X. For a pseudovariety V of
semigroups, we denote by ΩX V the free pro-V semigroup generated by X. Elements of ΩX V are called
X-ary implicit operations over V. See the paper of Almeida (1995) for details.
An implicit signature, as defined by Almeida and Steinberg (2000a), is a set of implicit operations of
finite arity including the formal binary multiplication. A σ-semigroup is an algebra in the signature σ
whose multiplication is associative. Thus, σ-semigroups form a Birkhoff variety. We call an element of
the free σ-semigroup generated by X a σ-term. For convenience, we allow the empty σ-term.
Every pro-V semigroup has a natural structure of σ-semigroup. We denote by ΩσX V the sub-σ-semigroup
of ΩX V generated by X. A σ-word over V is an element of ΩσX V. We denote by [_]V the surjective homomorphism of σ-semigroups that associates to a σ-term t its interpretation [t]V in ΩσX V. When t is a word
and V is clear from the context, we write t instead of [t]V .
b be the profinite completion of (N, +), i.e., the free profinite monoid
Unary implicit signatures. Let N
on one generator. We denote by 1 the implicit signature consisting of multiplication together with all
b \ N. An implicit signature is called unary if it is contained in 1 and it
implicit operations _α with α ∈ N
b such
contains at least one unary implicit operation. For a unary implicit signature σ, an element α ∈ N
α
that the α-power operation _ belongs to σ is said to be a σ-exponent. Note that by definition of 1, every
σ-exponent is infinite. An important example of a unary implicit signature is the signature κ, for which
ω − 1 is the only κ-exponent.
The σ-rank rankσ (t) of a σ-term t is the maximal nesting depth of elements of σ, disregarding multiplication, that occur in t. It is defined inductively by rankσ (t1 t2 ) = max(rankσ (t1 ), rankσ (t2 )) and
rankσ (π(t1 , . . . , tn )) = 1 + max1,...,n (rankσ (ti )) in case π is an operation from σ which is not multiplication. For a σ-term
αm
1
t = t0 s α
(2.1)
1 t1 · · · s m tm ,
where the ti ’s and the sj ’s are σ-terms such that rankσ (ti ) 6 rankσ (sj ) = rankσ (t) − 1 and each αj is
i
a σ-exponent, we denote by νσ (t) the number m of subterms sα
i of t. When σ is clear from the context,
we may write rank(t), ν(t) instead of rankσ (t), νσ (t), respectively.
Complete unary implicit signatures. A unary implicit signature σ is said to be complete if the set of σexponents is stable under the mappings α 7→ α − 1 and α 7→ α + 1. Note that 1 is complete, while κ is not.
The intersection of a nonempty set of complete unary signatures either consists of multiplication solely, or
6
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
is again a complete unary signature. Therefore, the smallest complete unary signature containing a given
unary signature σ exists. It is called the completion of σ and it is denoted by σ̄. By definition, we have
σ ⊆ σ̄, and a signature σ is complete if and only if σ̄ = σ. Note that for every 1-exponent α and every
u ∈ ΩX S, the equalities uα−1 = uα uω−1 and uα+1 = uα u hold. This proves the following useful fact.
Remark 1. Let σ be a unary signature containing κ. Then Ωσ̄X V = ΩσX V.
2.1 Factorization sequences
b we choose a sequence (ξn (α))n of natural integers converging to α. One can assume that
For α ∈ N,
(ξn (α))n is constant if α is finite, or strictly increasing otherwise. Let t be a 1-term. We denote by
ξn (t) the word obtained by replacing each subterm v α with α infinite by v ξn (α) , recursively. For instance,
ξn ((aα b)β ) = (aξn (α) b)ξn (β) . The factorizations ξn (t) = x·y with x ∈ X ∗ and y ∈ X + may be obtained
recursively as follows:
• if rank(t) = 0, then ξn (t) = t for all n and there are |t| such factorizations of ξn (t);
αm
1
• if rank(t) > 0 and t = t0 sα
1 t1 · · · sm tm , where the ti ’s and the sj ’s are σ-terms such that
rank(ti ) 6 rank(sj ) = rank(t) − 1 (where the ti ’s may be empty), then the factorizations of ξn (t)
are those of the following forms:
α
α
j+1
j
αm
′
′′
1
ξn (t) = ξn (t0 sα
1 · · · tj−1 sj ) tj · tj ξn (sj+1 tj+1 · · · sm tm )
(2.2)
where ξn (tj ) = t′j t′′j , and
α
α
j+1
j−1
αm
k ′
′′
ℓ
1
ξn (t) = ξn (t0 sα
1 · · · sj−1 tj−1 sj )sj · sj ξn (sj tj sj+1 · · · sm tm )
(2.3)
where ξn (sj ) = s′j s′′j , k, ℓ ∈ N, and k + ℓ + 1 = ξn (αj ).
The condition y ∈ X + , forbidding y to be empty, is used recursively to ensure that each factorization of
ξn (t) is either of type (2.2) or (2.3), but not of both types: one can verify that each factorization of ξn (t)
is obtained by exactly one of the equations (2.2) and (2.3), where j, t′j , t′′j (in case (2.2)), or j, k, ℓ, s′j , s′′j
(in case (2.3)) are uniquely determined. In particular, the factorization
α
p+1
αp
αm
1
ξn (t0 sα
1 · · · tp−1 sp tp ) · ξn (sp+1 tp+1 · · · sm tm )
cannot be of type (2.2), since this would force t′′p to be empty, which is forbidden. This factorization is in
fact of type (2.3) with j = p + 1 and k = 0.
As an example, for t = aω baω , the expression (2.1) is obtained for m = 2, where t0 and t2 are empty,
α2
ω
ω
1
while sα
1 = a , t1 = b, and s2 = a . Assuming ξn (ω) = n!, we obtain
– the factorization an! · ban! by (2.2), with j = 1, t′1 empty and t′′1 = b;
– the factorization an! b · an! by (2.3), j = 2, k = 0, ℓ = n! − 1, s′2 empty and s′′2 = a.
The history hn (t, x, y) of a factorization ξn (t) = xy is defined recursively as follows:
– if rank(t) = 0, then hn (t, x, y) = (x, y);
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
7
– if rank(t) > 0 and the factorization is of the form (2.2), then hn (t, x, y) is obtained by concatenating the pair (1, j) with hn (tj , t′j , t′′j );
– if rank(t) > 0 and the factorization is of the form (2.3), then hn (t, x, y) is obtained by concatenating the 4-tuple (2, j, k, ℓ) with hn (sj , s′j , s′′j ).
The history hn (t, x, y) is thus a word on an alphabet that depends on the integer n, which gives information
on how the word ξn (t) is split by the factorization xy. Note that the length of the history hn (t, x, y) is at
most rank(t) + 1.
The simplified history sh n (t, x, y) of the factorization ξn (t) = xy is obtained from the history hn (t, x, y)
by replacing each 4-tuple (2, j, k, ℓ) by (2, j). On the other hand, dropping the first two components of
each letter of the history hn (t, x, y), we obtain a word whose letters are pairs of nonnegative integers,
which we identify with an integer vector in even dimension, called the exponent vector. A factorization
of ξn (t) can be recovered from its history but may not be recoverable from its simplified history without
the extra information contained in the exponent vector.
Observe that (ξn (t))n converges to [t]S in ΩX S. We will be interested in sequences (xn , yn )n such that
xn yn = ξn (t). We call such a sequence a factorization sequence for t.
It will be convenient in the proofs to work with factorization sequences having additional properties.
Note that the set of simplified histories of factorizations of ξn (t) is finite and depends only on t. Moreover,
the dimension of all exponent vectors is bounded by 2 rank(t). Therefore, any factorization sequence for
t has a subsequence whose
(a) induced sequence of simplified histories is constant,
b d \ Nd .
(b) induced sequence of exponent vectors belongs to Nd for some constant d and converges in N
We call filtered a sequence with these properties. An application of this notion is the following simple
statement.
Lemma 2.1. Let (xn , yn )n be a factorization sequence for a 1-term. Then both (xn )n and (yn )n have
subsequences converging in ΩX S to 1-words.
Proof: Let t be the 1-term of the statement. By the above, one may assume that the sequence (xn , yn )n
is filtered. We proceed by induction on rank(t). The case rank(t) = 0 is straightforward. Otherwise,
αm
1
let t = t0 sα
1 t1 · · · sm tm as in (2.1). There are two cases, according to the first letter of sh n (t, x, y),
which can be of the form (1, j) or (2, j). Both cases are similar, so assume that it is of the form (1, j).
αj
′
1
Therefore, the factorization xn yn of ξn (t) is given by (2.2), hence xn = ξn (t0 sα
1 · · · tj−1 sj ) tj,n and
αj+1
′′
αm
′
′′
yn = tj,n ξn (sj+1 tj+1 · · · sm tm ) where ξn (tj ) = tj,n tj,n . By definition, tj is a 1-term and rank(tj ) <
rank(t), whence by induction (t′j,n )n and (t′′j,n )n have subsequences converging to 1-terms, respectively
αj ′
1
t′j and t′′j . Therefore, (xn )n (resp. (yn )n ) has a subsequence converging to the 1-term t0 sα
1 · · · tj−1 sj ·tj
αj+1
m
tj+1 · · · sα
(resp. t′′j · sj+1
m tm ).
8
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
2.2 Factoriality of some pseudovarieties
A pseudovariety of semigroups is said to be closed under concatenation if the corresponding variety of
rational languages has that property. A nontrivial pseudovariety V is closed under concatenation if and
only if it contains A, the pseudovariety of aperiodic (or group-free) semigroups, and the multiplication of
the profinite semigroup ΩX V is an open mapping for every finite alphabet X as proved by Almeida and
Costa (2009) based on results of Straubing (1979) (in the monoid case) and Chaubard et al. (2006) (in the
semigroup case) characterizing such pseudovarieties in terms of certain algebraic closure properties.
A pseudovariety V is said σ-factorial if, for every finite alphabet X, every factor in ΩX V of a σ-word
over V is also a σ-word over V. Note that the pseudovariety S is not κ-factorial, since xα is a prefix of xω
b
for every α ∈ N.
Theorem 2.2. Let V be a pseudovariety closed under concatenation. Then V is 1-factorial.
Proof: The statement is obvious if V is trivial. Otherwise, let u = vw be a factorization in ΩX V of an
arbitrary element of Ω1X V. Let t be a 1-term such that [t]V = u. Since the sequence (ξn (t))n converges
to u = vw in ΩX V and the multiplication is open in ΩX V, for all sufficiently large n, each ξn (t) may be
factorized as ξn (t) = vn wn in such a way that lim vn = v and lim wn = w.
By Lemma 2.1, both (vn )n and (wn )n have subsequences converging, in ΩX S, to 1-words over S.
Therefore, in ΩX V, these subsequences converge to 1-words over V, so that v and w are actually 1-words
over V.
For a pseudovariety H of groups, H denotes the pseudovariety of all finite semigroups whose subgroups
lie in H. In particular, when H is the trivial pseudovariety, then H = A. It is a well-known and elementary
fact that H is always closed under concatenation. Denote by Bn the Burnside pseudovariety of all finite
groups of exponent dividing n. The pseudovariety Bn is thus defined by the pseudoidentity xω+n = xω .
In the following result, the special case n = 1, corresponding to the pseudovariety A, was first shown
by Almeida et al. (2015) with a much more involved proof.
Corollary 2.3. For every positive integer n the pseudovariety Bn is κ-factorial. In particular, the pseudovariety A is κ-factorial.
Proof: We claim that the equality ΩκX Bn = Ω1X Bn holds for |X| = 1 and so also for every finite alphabet
X. Therefore, the result follows from Theorem 2.2. To prove the claim, we show that Ω{x} Bn = {xk |
k ∈ N} ∪ {xω , xω+1 , . . . , xω+(n−1) }. For this, let α be a 1-exponent and let (ak )k be a sequence of
integers converging to α. One can assume that ak modulo n is a constant a, hence ak = nbk + a with
bk ∈ N for all k. In Ω{x} Bn , we then have xα = xω+α = limk xω+ak = limk xω+nbk +a = xω+a ∈
ΩκX Bn .
Another application of Theorem 2.2 is the following result, which is a weaker version of one that was
established in (Almeida and Volkov, 2006, Corollary 8.12). Although the original result was formulated
for the pseudovariety of all finite semigroups, the proof applies unchanged to pseudovarieties containing
all finite local semilattices. Related results, under the same hypothesis as the following corollary, have
been obtained by Steinberg (2010).
Corollary 2.4. If |X| > 2 and V is a nontrivial pseudovariety closed under concatenation, then there is
no 1-word in the minimum ideal of ΩX V.
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
9
Proof: Since V is 1-factorial by Theorem 2.2 and since every element of ΩX V is a factor of every element
of the minimum ideal, if there were a 1-word in the minimum ideal then every element of ΩX V would be
a 1-word. We claim that this is impossible under the hypothesis that |X| > 2.
To prove the claim, observe that by definition, every 1-word of ΩX V which is not a word has at least
one infinite power of a finite word as an infix. In particular, it admits as factors powers of finite words
of arbitrarily large exponent. Thus, it suffices to exhibit an element of ΩX V that fails this condition. For
this purpose let x, y ∈ X be distinct letters and consider the Prouhet-Thue-Morse substitution, defined
by ϕ(x) = xy, ϕ(y) = yx, and ϕ(z) = z for all z ∈ X \ {x, y}. This extends to a unique continuous endomorphism of ΩX V, which we also denote ϕ. Since, as proved by Hunter (1983), the monoid
of continuous endomorphisms of ΩX V is profinite under the pointwise convergence topology, we may
consider the element ϕω (x) = lim ϕn! (x). Now, it is well known that each word ϕn! (x) is cube free
(see, for instance, Lothaire (1983)). Since V is nontrivial and closed under concatenation product, it contains A. Therefore, the sets of the form (ΩX V)1 u(ΩX V)1 , where u is a word, are open (Almeida, 1995,
Theorem 3.6.1). Hence, ϕω (x) is also free of cubes of finite words and so ϕω (x) is not a 1-word.
3 The Pin-Reutenauer procedure over S for pure signatures
Given a pseudovariety V of semigroups, an implicit signature σ and a subset L ⊆ ΩσX V, we denote by L
the closure of L in ΩσX V. Both the implicit signature σ and the pseudovariety V are understood in this
notation. We are interested in computing a representation of such closures in two cases:
(a) when L is of the form pV (K) for some rational subset K of X + , where pV is the natural continuous
homomorphism from ΩX S to ΩX V;
(b) when L is a rational subset of ΩσX V.
Recall that the class of rational subsets of a semigroup M is the smallest family of subsets of M
containing the empty set and the singletons {m} for m ∈ M , and closed under union
S (Y, Z) 7→ Y + Z,
product (Y, Z) 7→ Y Z = {yz | y ∈ Y, z ∈ Z} and iteration Y 7→ Y + = k>1 Y k . Since the
homomorphic image of a rational set is rational, any set of the form a is also of the form b. Conversely,
there are of course rational sets of ΩσX V that are not obtained as image of a rational set of X + under pV ,
b is a σ-exponent.
such as the singletons {aα } where α ∈ N
We say that the Pin-Reutenauer procedure holds for a class C of subsets of ΩσX V if, for every K, L ∈ C,
the following conditions are satisfied:
KL = K L,
(3.1)
L+
(3.2)
= hLiσ ,
where hU iσ denotes the σ-subalgebra generated by the subset U of ΩσX V. Again, in this notation, the fact
that closures are taken in ΩσX V is understood.
We say that V is (weakly) σ-PR if, for every finite alphabet X, the Pin-Reutenauer procedure holds
for the class of all subsets of ΩσX V of the form pV (L) with L ⊆ X + a rational language. We say that V
is strongly σ-PR if, for every finite alphabet X, the Pin-Reutenauer procedure holds for the class of all
rational subsets of ΩσX V.
10
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
In this section, we only deal with the pseudovariety S. In Section 4, we shall transfer our results from S
to other pseudovarieties. The main result of this section is the following theorem. It applies only to pure
signatures, which we describe below.
Theorem 3.1. The pseudovariety S is σ-PR for every pure unary signature σ containing κ.
The additional purity property that σ is required to possess is the following.
b if dα
Definition. A unary signature σ is said to be pure if, for every positive integer d and for all α ∈ N,
is a σ̄-exponent, then α is also a σ̄-exponent.
b and d ∈ N \ {0}
Note that the quotient of dα by d is actually uniquely determined: if α, β ∈ N
are such that dα = dβ, then α = β. This follows immediately from the fact that the free profinite
b \ N, is torsion-free. Let us show this fact directly:
group on one generator, which is isomorphic to N
dα = dβ means that all finite semigroups satisfy xdα = xdβ . To show that all finite semigroups also
satisfy xα = xβ , it is sufficient to consider 1-generated semigroups. Such semigroups have presentations
of the form Sm,p = ha : am = am+p i, for integers m, p > 0. Note that the semigroup homomorphism
ϕ : Sm,p → Sdm,dp mapping a to ad is injective. Since Sdm,dp satisfies xdα = xdβ , we have in Sdm,dp
the equalities ϕ(aα ) = adα = adβ = ϕ(aβ ), whence Sm,p satisfies xα = xβ . This proves that α = β.
In view of the following lemma, Theorem 3.1 can be applied to the signature κ.
Lemma 3.2. The unary signature κ is pure.
Proof: Every κ̄-exponent is of the form ω + n, where n ∈ Z. Therefore, it suffices to show that, if n is an
b is such that ω + n = dα, then d divides n, whence α = ω + n is
integer, d is a positive integer, and α ∈ N
d
again a κ̄-exponent. For that purpose, consider the unique continuous homomorphism of additive monoids
b → Z/dZ which maps 1 to 1. We have ϕ(ω) = ϕ(limk k!) = 0 and ϕ(dα) = dϕ(α) = 0, and we
ϕ:N
deduce from the equality ω + n = dα that ϕ(n) = 0.
To establish Theorem 3.1, we first prove a technical key lemma in Section 3.1. We shall then consider
separately the cases of concatenation and iteration respectively in Sections 3.2 and 3.3.
3.1 A key lemma
We first prove a technical result which will be the key lemma in the sequel. It shows that, under suitable hypotheses, one can balance the factors of a factorization of a given σ̄-term to make them σ̄-terms
themselves, without affecting membership in given clopen sets. For L ⊆ X + , we denote by cl(L) the
topological closure of L in ΩX S.
Given 1-terms t1 , . . . , tm and languages L1 , . . . , Lm , we say that (t1 , . . . , tm ) is a (L1 , . . . , Lm )splitting of a 1-term t if the following conditions hold:
(i) t = t1 · · · tm ;
(ii) [ti ]S ∈ cl(Li ) for every i = 1, . . . , m.
Given a σ-term t, let λσ (t) = (rankσ (t), νσ (t)). We may write λ instead of λσ when σ is clear from the
context.
Lemma 3.3. Let σ be a unary signature containing κ, let t be a σ̄-term, and let L1 , . . . , Lm be rational
languages. If t admits an (L1 , . . . , Lm )-splitting (t1 , . . . , tm ), then there exists a σ̄-term z admitting an
(L1 , . . . , Lm )-splitting (z1 , . . . , zm ) such that:
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
11
(1) [z]S = [t]S ,
(2) zi is a σ̄-term for i = 1, . . . , m,
(3) λσ̄ (zi ) = λ1 (ti ) for i = 1, . . . , m.
Proof: We only prove the statement for m = 2, since it is representative of the general case, and it allows
a simplified notation.
Let (t1 , t2 ) be an (L1 , L2 )-splitting of t. Set xn = ξn (t1 ) and yn = ξn (t2 ). By ii, lim xn = [t1 ]S
belongs to cl(L1 ), which is open by rationality of L1 (Almeida, 1995, Thm. 3.6.1). Therefore, the word
xn belongs to L1 for all sufficiently large n. Similarly, the word yn belongs to L2 for all sufficiently
large n. Let ϕ : X + → S be a homomorphism into a finite semigroup recognizing both languages L1
and L2 . In view of i, (xn , yn )n is a factorization sequence for t. Let (xnr , ynr )r be a filtered subsequence
of (xn , yn )n , and let (k1,r , ℓ1,r , . . . , kd,r , ℓd,r )r be the sequence of exponent vectors for the factorization
ξnr (t) = xnr ynr . When (ki,r )r (resp. (ℓi,r )r ) is constant, let ki (resp. ℓi ) be this constant value. Otherwise, by taking a subsequence, we may assume that for each s ∈ S, each of the sequences (ski,r )r and
(sℓi,r )r is constant, say with value respectively ski and sℓi (i = 1, . . . , d), the integers ki and ℓi being
independent of the element s ∈ S.
In view of Case (2.3) of the definition of factorization sequence and since t is a σ̄-term, each sequence
(ki,r + ℓi,r + 1)r converges to some σ̄-exponent γi . In particular, γi is infinite. Define (αi , βi ) by
if (ki,r )r is constant and (ℓi,r )r unbounded,
(ki , γi − ki − 1)
(αi , βi ) = (γi − ℓi − 1, ℓi )
if (ki,r )r is unbounded and (ℓi,r )r constant,
(γi − ℓi − 1, ω + ℓi ) if both (ki,r )r and (ℓi,r )r are unbounded.
Note that in all cases, we have
αi + βi + 1 = γi .
(3.3)
Let z1 (resp. z2 ) be the 1-term obtained from xnr (resp. from ynr ) by replacing for every i the exponent
ki,r by αi and the exponent ℓi,r by βi . Set
z = z1 z2 ,
and let us verify that z1 , z2 and z fulfill the desired properties. We have to show properties 1–3, and that
(z1 , z2 ) is an (L1 , L2 )-splitting of z.
First note that, by (3.3), we have [y αi +βi +1 ]S = [y γi ]S for all 1-term y. Since (ki,r + ℓi,r + 1)r
converges to γi , using (2.3) we deduce that [z]S = [t]S , which proves 1. Next, by definition αi and βi
either belong to N, or are of one of the forms γi − n or ω + n where n ∈ N. Since γi is a σ̄-exponent
and since σ contains κ, both αi and βi are σ̄-exponents, whence both z1 , z2 are σ̄-terms, which proves 2.
Finally, we have λσ̄ (zi ) = λ1 (ti ) by construction, which is 3.
It remains to verify that (z1 , z2 ) is an (L1 , L2 )-splitting of z. Condition i is satisfied by definition
of z. Let us verify that z1 ∈ cl(L1 ) (showing that z2 ∈ cl(L2 ) is similar). Let ϕ̂ : ΩX S → S be
the continuous extension of ϕ to ΩX S. By ii applied to the (L1 , L2 )-splitting (t1 , t2 ) of t, we have
t1 ∈ cl(L1 ) = ϕ̂−1 (ϕ(L1 )). Since t1 is the limit of (xnr )r , it suffices to show that ϕ̂(z1 ) = ϕ(xnr ). This
follows from the claim that for r large enough, sξnr (αi ) = ski = skir , which is clear if (kir )r is constant,
while it is obtained by reasoning in the group {sω+p | p > 0} if (kir )r is unbounded.
12
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
3.2 The case of concatenation
We are now ready to treat the case of concatenation, that is, to establish Property (3.1).
Theorem 3.4. Equality (3.1) holds over the pseudovariety S for every unary signature σ containing κ
and for all rational languages K, L ⊆ X + .
Proof: The inclusion from right to left in (3.1) amounts to continuity of multiplication in ΩσX S and thus
it is always valid. For the direct inclusion, let v be an arbitrary element of KL. We need to show that v
belongs to K · L.
Choose a σ-term t such that [t]S = v. Since v ∈ cl(KL) and since the closure cl(KL) of the rational
language KL is clopen (Almeida, 1995, Thm. 3.6.1), the word ξn (t) belongs to KL for all sufficiently
large n. For such n, let t1,n ∈ K and t2,n ∈ L be words such that ξn (t) = t1,n t2,n , and let (t1,nr , t2,nr )r
be a filtered subsequence of (t1,n , t2,n )n . For i = 1, 2, let ti be the term obtained by substituting each
b d , so that lim ti,n = [ti ]S , and
exponent vector with the limit of the sequence of exponent vectors, in N
r
(t1 , t2 ) is a (K, L)-splitting of t. By Lemma 3.3, it follows that there exists a σ̄-term z such that v = [z]S
and z admits a (K, L)-splitting (z1 , z2 ) into σ̄-terms. Since the unary signature σ contains κ, we have
Ωσ̄X S = ΩσX S by Remark 1. Hence, [z1 ]S ∈ cl(K) ∩ Ωσ̄X S = cl(K) ∩ ΩσX S = K, and similarly [z2 ]S ∈ L.
Finally, v = [z]S = [z1 z2 ]S = [z1 ]S · [z2 ]S ∈ K · L.
3.3 The case of iteration
We now show that (3.2) holds over the pseudovariety S, for every pure implicit signature σ containing κ
and every rational language L ⊆ X + . It is easy to see that the inclusion from right to left in (3.2) always
holds, see Almeida et al. (2014). The rest of this subsection is devoted to the proof of the other inclusion.
Theorem 3.5. Equality (3.2) holds over the pseudovariety S for every pure unary signature σ containing
κ and for every rational language L ⊆ X + .
The proof of Theorem 3.5 follows the lines of its analog for the pseudovariety A which is presented
in (Almeida et al., 2014, Section 6), even though the argument requires significant changes in several
points.
Consider an element v of L+ . We must show that there is a σ-term which coincides with v when
evaluated on (finitely many) suitable elements of L. It turns out to be convenient to assume more generally
that v ∈ clσ̄ (L+ ), so that there exists a σ̄-term t such that [t]S = v. Therefore, we want to show that, for
every σ̄-term t,
for every rational language L, [t]S ∈ L+ implies [t]S ∈ hLiσ .
(Pt )
Let wk = ξk (t). The sequence of words (wk )k converges to v = [t]S in ΩX S. As v belongs to the open
set L+ , the word wk belongs to L+ for all sufficiently large k, and we may therefore assume that there
are factorizations
wk = w1,k · · · wrk ,k ,
(3.4)
with each wi,j ∈ L. If there is a bounded subsequence of the sequence (rk )k , which counts the number of
factors from L, then Theorem 3.4 yields that v belongs to the subsemigroup of ΩσX S generated by L and
we are done. We may therefore assume that lim rk = ∞, which implies that rank(t) > 1. We first reduce
the problem to the case ν(t) = 1.
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
13
Proposition 3.6. Assume that (Pt ) holds for every σ̄-term t with ν(t) = 1. Then, it holds for every σ̄-term
t.
Proof: Let t be a σ̄-term such that ν(t) > 1. Let v = [t]S , and assume that v ∈ L+ . To show that v ∈ hLiσ ,
we proceed by induction on λ(t), for the lexicographical order on N × N. Consider the factorization of t
in σ̄-terms as in (2.1) and the factorization (3.4) of wk = ξk (t). We distinguish three cases.
Case 1 Suppose first that there are infinitely many indices k for which there exists ik ∈ {1, . . . , rk }
such that the first letter of the simplified history
sh k (t, w1,k · · · wik ,k , wik +1,k · · · wrk ,k )
is of one of the forms (1, j) with 0 6= j 6= m, or (2, j) with 1 6= j 6= m. That is, the corresponding
factorizations (xk , yk ), where xk = w1,k · · · wik ,k and yk = wik +1,k · · · wrk ,k , do not split ξk (t) in its
αm
1
prefix ξk (t0 sα
1 ), nor in its suffix ξk (sm tm ).
By Lemma 2.1, both (xk )k and (yk )k admit subsequences converging to 1-words, say v1 = [u1 ]S
and v2 = [u2 ]S respectively, with u1 u2 = t. Since both xk and yk belong to L+ , we deduce that
v1 , v2 ∈ cl(L+ ). Therefore, one can apply Lemma 3.3: there exist σ̄-terms z1 and z2 such that v = [z1 z2 ]S ,
and for i = 1, 2, λ(zi ) = λ(ui ) and [zi ]S ∈ cl(L+ ). By Remark 1, we obtain [zi ]S ∈ L+ . By the
assumption on the first letter of the simplified histories, we have rank(ui ) = rank(t) and ν(ui ) < ν(t),
hence λ(zi ) = λ(ui ) < λ(t) (i = 1, 2). Arguing inductively, we deduce that [z1 ]S and [z2 ]S belong to
hLiσ , whence so does v = [z1 z2 ]S = [z1 ]S · [z2 ]S . This concludes the proof for Case 1.
Case 2 Assume now that for all sufficiently large k, there is an index ik such that the first letters of the
simplified histories
sh k (t, w1,k · · · wik −1,k , wik ,k · · · wrk ,k )
sh k (t, w1,k · · · wik ,k , wik +1,k · · · wrk ,k )
are of the forms (1,0) or (2,1) for the first one, and (1, m) or (2, m) for the second one. In other words,
αm
1
the factor wik ,k of ξk (t) jumps from the prefix ξk (t0 sα
1 ) to the suffix ξk (sm tm ).
As in the first case, we may apply twice Lemma 2.1 to obtain from the following sequence of factorizations
wk = w1,k · · · wik −1,k · wik ,k · wik +1,k · · · wrk ,k
(k > 1),
an (L+ , L, L+ )-splitting of t into 1-terms, say t = u1 u2 u3 . Applying Lemma 3.3, we deduce that there
exists an (L+ , L, L+ )-splitting (z1 , z2 , z3 ) into σ̄-terms of a σ̄-term z such that [z]S = v and λ(zi ) =
λ(ui ), i = 1, 2, 3. By Remark 1, we obtain [z1 ]S , [z3 ]S ∈ L+ and [z2 ]S ∈ L. By the hypothesis of Case
2, we know that for i = 1, 3, we have either rank(ui ) = rank(t) and ν(ui ) = 1, or rank(ui ) < rank(t).
Hence, λ(zi ) < λ(t). Thus, we may apply the induction hypothesis to deduce that [z1 ]S and [z3 ]S belong
to hLiσ . Hence, we finally have v = [z1 ]S · [z2 ]S · [z3 ]S ∈ hLiσ · L · hLiσ ⊆ hLiσ .
Case 3 Assume finally that for all sufficiently large k and for all indices ik , the first letter of the simplified history sh k (t, w1,k · · · wik −1,k , wik ,k · · · wrk ,k ) is
1
(a) either of the form (1,0) or (2,1), which means that wrk ,k spans from the prefix ξk (t0 sα
1 ) to the end
of ξk (t),
14
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
(b) or of the form (1, n) or (2, n), which means that w1,k jumps from the beginning of ξk (t) to the suffix
m
ξk (sα
m tm ).
This case is treated as Case 2, setting v3 (resp. v1 ) to be the empty term, in case a or b occurs.
To conclude the proof of Theorem 3.5, it remains to treat the case where ν(t) = 1. For dealing with
this case, we use directed weighted multigraphs. A (multi)graph is a tuple (Q, (Ep,q )(p,q)∈Q×Q ) where
Q is a set of vertices, and Ep,q is a set of edges having source p and target q, for each pair of vertices
(p, q) ∈ Q × Q. In the sequel, the graphs shall always be finite. A weighted multigraph is given by a
multigraph together with a weight function, which associates to each edge e a nonnegative integer w(e).
If e is an edge with source p and target q, we represent this edge by
w(e)
p −−−→ q.
For a path γ of a graph Γ, let c(γ) denote the edge-induced subgraph of Γ whose edges are those
traversed by γ. We call c(γ) the support of γ. Furthermore, if ζ is an edge of Γ, then |γ|ζ denotes the
number of times γ goes through the edge ζ. For a subgraph Γ′ of Γ, we denote by |γ|Γ′ the minimum of
|γ|ζ with ζ an arbitrary edge of Γ′ .
Lemma 3.7. Let (πk )k be a sequence of paths of a finite multigraph Γ. If there is some edge ζ for which
the sequence (|πk |ζ )k is unbounded, then there is some cycle γ such that (|πk |c(γ) )k is unbounded.
Proof: Consider on each path πk the subpaths which start with the edge ζ and whose length is the total
number of vertices of the graph Γ. Since there are only finitely many such subpaths, at least one of them,
say δ, must be used an unbounded number of times. Because δ must go at least twice through the same
vertex, δ contains some cycle which satisfies the required condition.
We conclude the proof of Theorem 3.5 by establishing the following result, which, combined with Proposition 3.6, implies that Property (Pt ) holds for every σ̄-term t.
Proposition 3.8. Property (Pt ) holds for every σ̄-term t with ν(t) = 1.
Proof: Let t be a σ̄-term with ν(t) = 1. Let w = [t]S . Assuming that w ∈ L+ , we want to show that
1
w ∈ hLiσ . We have t = t0 sα
1 t1 , with rank(t0 ), rank(t1 ) 6 rank(s1 ) = rank(t) − 1. Let wk = ξk (t).
Since for k large enough, we have wk ∈ L+ , one may consider a factorization (3.4) of wk . Using a similar
argument as in the proof of Case 2 of Proposition 3.6, we may assume, replacing (wk )k by a subsequence
if necessary, that ξk (t0 ) is a prefix of w1,k and ξk (t1 ) is a suffix of wrk ,k .
Since L is a rational language of X + , there is a homomorphism ϕ : X ∗ → M onto a finite monoid M
such that ϕ−1 (1) = {1} and ϕ−1 (ϕ(L)) = L. Let m and p be positive integers such that
am+p = am for every a ∈ M .
(3.5)
We construct for each k a finite directed multigraph Γk . The set of vertices is
Vk = (a, b) ∈ M × M : ξk (s1 ) ∈ ϕ−1 (a)L∗ ϕ−1 (b) ∪ {ˆ, $},
where the two symbols ˆ and $ do not belong to M . The following are the edges of the graph Γk , where
e denotes a natural number that does not exceed ξk (α1 ):
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
15
e+1
• there is an edge (a1 , b1 ) −−→ (a2 , b2 ) if L ∩ ϕ−1 (b1 )ξk (se1 )ϕ−1 (a2 ) 6= ∅;
e
• there is an edge ˆ −
→ (a, b) if L ∩ ξk (t0 se1 )ϕ−1 (a) 6= ∅;
e+1
• there is an edge (a, b) −−→ $ if L ∩ ϕ−1 (b)ξk (se1 t1 ) 6= ∅.
e
→ q2 with e > m if and only
Observe that, in view of (3.5), there is an edge in the graph of the form q1 −
e+p
if there is also an edge q1 −−→ q2 and e + p 6 ξk (α1 ).
The purpose of this graph is to capture factorizations of the product ξk (t0 )ξk (s1 )ξk (α1 ) ξk (t1 ) belonging
to L+ . More precisely, for each k, the factorizations
wk = ξk (t0 )ξk (s1 )ξk (α1 ) ξk (t1 )
(3.6)
= w1,k · · · wrk ,k
determine a path πk from vertex ˆ to vertex $: the factors wi,k which are not completely contained
in some factor ξk (s1 ) determine the edges. Each intermediate vertex in the path corresponds to a factor
ξk (s1 ) together with a factorization into a word, followed by a possibly empty product of elements from L,
followed by a word, where only the values under ϕ of the prefix and suffix words are relevant.
Conversely, every path γ from ˆ to $ determines a factorization of a word of the form ξk (t0 sℓ1 t1 ) into a
product of elements of L. Indeed, we may choose for each intermediate vertex q words uq,k , vq,k ∈ X ∗
and zq,k ∈ L∗ such that
ξk (s1 ) = uq,k zq,k vq,k .
(3.7)
e+1
Then, for each edge ζ : qζ −−→ qζ′ , the word
yζ,k = vqζ ,k ξk (se1 ) uqζ′ ,k
(3.8)
e
e+1
belongs to L. If the path γ is the sequence of edges (ζ0 , ζ1 , . . . , ζr ), with ζ0 : ˆ −
→ qζ′ 0 and ζr : qζr −−→ $,
then we also have words
yζ0 ,k = ξk (t0 se1 ) uqζ′
0
,k
yζr ,k = vqζr ,k ξk (se1 t1 )
in L. Then the following is the factorization associated with the path:
ξk (t0 sℓ1 t1 ) = yζ0 ,k zqζ1 ,k yζ1 ,k · · · zqζr ,k yζr ,k .
(3.9)
The total number ℓ of factors ξk (s1 ) that are covered by following the path γ is the sum of the weights
of the edges, taking into account multiplicities; we call it the total weight of the path. Combining with
Euler’s Theorem (Almeida, 1995, Theorem 5.7.1), it is now easy to deduce that each of the following
transformations does not change the total weight of a path and therefore the value of the left side of the
equality (3.9):
1. to traverse the edges in a path in a different order, without changing the number of times we go
through each edge;
16
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
2. suppose that in the support of the path there are two cycles δ1 and δ2 , with respective total weights
n1 and n2 , and that the positive integers r1 and r2 are such that n1 r1 = n2 r2 ; suppose further that
the path goes through each edge in δi more than ri times; to replace the path by another one which
goes through each edge in δ1 less r1 times than before and through each edge in δ2 more r2 than
before;
e
e2 +p
1
q2 and q3 −−−→ q4 in the path with both e1 , e2 > m, to replace in the
3. if there are two edges q1 −→
e1 +p
e1
q2 by that of the edge q1 −−−→ q2 , provided we compensate
path one occurrence of the edge q1 −→
e2 +p
e2
q4 ;
by replacing one occurrence of the edge q3 −−−→ q4 by q3 −→
4. suppose that in the support of the path there is a cycle δ with total weight n and that the path goes
e
→ q2 with
through each edge in δ at least p + 1 times; suppose further that there is an edge q1 −
weight at least m; replace the path by another one which goes through each edge in δ less p times
e+np
e
→ q2 by q1 −−−→ q2 .
than before and change the edge q1 −
Using transformations of type 3, we may assume that the path πk goes through at most one edge whose
weight exceeds m + p − 1. Therefore, the remaining edges in πk are taken from a fixed finite set. Thus,
by taking a subsequence, we may further assume that all paths πk use exactly the same edges of weight
at most m + p − 1 and, either none of the πk use any other edges or, otherwise they all use only one
additional edge ζk connecting two fixed vertices. Hence all the graphs c(πk ) are the same finite graph, up
to an isomorphism that only changes one edge.
On the other hand, using transformations of type 4, we may assume that if all the paths πk go through
some edge of weight at least m, then the graph c(πk ) contains no cycle in which every edge is used at
least p + 1 times.
We now split the argument into two cases. Suppose first that every c(πk ) contains an edge of weight at
least m. In this case, one can apply Lemma 3.7 to deduce that there is a bound on the length of the paths
πk and, therefore, we may assume that they all have the same length. Moreover, we may further assume
that, except for the edge ζi,k , at the same position i, all paths πk = (ζ0 , . . . , ζi−1 , ζi,k , ζi+1 , . . . , ζr ) are
identical. Consider the factorizations
wk = yζ0 ,k zqζ1 ,k · · · yζi−1 ,k zqζi ,k yζi,k ,k zqζi+1 ,k yζi+1 ,k · · · zqζr ,k yζr ,k
of the form (3.9) associated with each of the paths πk .
Let ej be the weight of each edge ζj (j 6= i) and let ei,k be the weight of the edge ζi,k . Computing the
total weight, we obtain the formula
ξk (α1 ) = ei,k +
X
ej .
(3.10)
j6=i
P
Letting k → ∞ in (3.10), we deduce that lim ei,k = α1 − j6=i ej and, therefore, ei = lim ei,k is a
σ̄-exponent, since so is α1 and since by definition, σ̄ is complete.
According to (3.8), the factors yζj ,k with j ∈
/ {0, i, r} are given by
e
yζj ,k = vqζj ,k ξk (s1j )uqζj+1 ,k .
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
17
By compactness of ΩX S, we may assume that each of the sequences (uq,k )k , (vq,k )k , and (zq,k )k converges to the respective limit uq , vq , and zq (q = qζ1 , . . . , qζr ). Let
y0 = [t0 se10 ]S uqζ1
yr = vqζr [se1r t1 ]S
e
yj = vqζj [s1j ]S uqζj+1 (j = 1, . . . , r − 1).
Then we obtain a factorization
w = y0 zqζ1 · · · yi−1 zqζi yi zqζi+1 yi+1 · · · zqζr yr
in which each yj belongs to cl(L), while the zq belong to cl(L+ ) ∪ {1}. By Lemma 3.3, we may assume
that each uq , vq , and zq is a σ̄-word. By definition (3.7) of the words zq,k , the latter has rank less than
rank(w). It follows that so is each yj . Hence the yj ’s belong to L and the zq belong to L+ ∪ {1}. By the
induction hypothesis, each zq belongs to hLiσ . Hence, w belongs to hLiσ , which completes the proof of
the first case.
It remains to consider the case where all edges have weight less than m. By previous reductions, we
know that the graph c(πk ) is constant. Because the total weight tends to ∞, so does the length of the
path πk . By Lemma 3.7, there is some simple cycle γ for which the sequence (|πk |c(γ) )k is unbounded.
Applying transformations of type 2, we may assume that there is only one such cycle. By Lemma 3.7, we
deduce that the paths δ with c(δ) ⊆ c(πk ) which go at most once through each edge in c(γ) have bounded
length. Hence, using transformations of type 1, we may assume that there is a path δ from ˆ to $ such
that the path πk is obtained by inserting the power cycle γ ℓk at a fixed vertex in the path δ, say πk is the
concatenated path δ0 γ ℓk δ1 . Let the total weights of the paths δi and γ be respectively ni and n. Then the
total weight of the path πk is given by the formula
ξk (α1 ) = n0 + n1 + nℓk .
(3.11)
b From (3.11),
By taking a subsequence, we may assume that the sequence (ℓk )k converges to some β ∈ N.
it follows that nβ = α1 − n0 − n1 . Since the signature σ is assumed to be pure, we deduce that β is a
σ̄-exponent.
By the argument in the preceding case, using the induction hypothesis, each of the paths δi and γ
determines a corresponding element of hLiσ , say respectively yi and y, such that w = y0 y β y1 . Since β is
a σ̄-exponent, we may now end the proof by observing that it follows that w ∈ hLiσ .
4 Pin-Reutenauer versus fullness
In this section, we apply the main results of Section 3 to show that the Pin-Reutenauer procedure is valid
for many pseudovarieties. For this purpose, we establish relationships between that property and fullness,
a notion introduced by Almeida and Steinberg (2000a). See also Almeida and Steinberg (2000b); Almeida
et al. (2014) for related properties and other applications of fullness.
Recall that pV denotes the natural continuous homomorphism from ΩX S to ΩX V. The pseudovariety
V is said to be full with respect to a class C of subsets of ΩσX S if the following equality holds for every
L ∈ C:
(4.1)
pV (L) = pV (L).
18
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
The closure of the left hand side of (4.1) is taken in ΩσX S, while the closure of the right hand side is taken
in ΩσX V. We say that V is (weakly) σ-full if, for every finite alphabet X, V is full with respect to the set of
all rational languages of X + . We also say that V is strongly σ-full if, for every finite alphabet X, V is full
with respect to the class of all rational subsets of ΩσX S.
4.1 The general case
We first consider the case of arbitrary pseudovarieties and signatures.
Proposition 4.1. Let σ be an arbitrary implicit signature, V be a pseudovariety, and C be the closure
under the rational operations of some set of finite subsets of ΩσX S. If the Pin-Reutenauer procedure holds
for C, then V is full with respect to C.
Proof: Let L be an arbitrary member of C. We need to show that the equality (4.1) holds. The inclusion
from left to right is an immediate consequence of the continuity of the mapping pV . For the reverse
inclusion, we proceed by induction on the construction of a rational expression of L in terms of finite
sets in C. If L is a finite set, then pV (L) = pV (L) and pV (L) = pV (L), and so the equality (4.1) is
trivially verified. Suppose next that L1 and L2 are elements of C for which the equality (4.1) holds. Since
topological closure and the application of mappings commutes with union, the equality (4.1) also holds
for L = L1 ∪ L2 . On the other hand, we have the following equalities and inclusions:
pV (L1 L2 ) = pV (L1 ) · pV (L2 ) since the Pin-Reutenauer procedure holds
for C
= pV (L1 ) · pV (L2 ) by the induction hypothesis
= pV (L1 · L2 )
since pV is a homomorphism
⊆ pV (L1 L2 )
by continuity of multiplication.
Taking into account that pV is a homomorphism of σ-semigroups and that the inclusion from right to left
in (3.2) always holds (see the paragraph preceding Theorem 3.5, p. 12), one can similarly show that (4.1)
holds for L = L+
1.
The following is an immediate application of Proposition 4.1.
Corollary 4.2. Let σ be an arbitrary implicit signature and V a pseudovariety. If V is (strongly) σ-PR
then V is (respectively strongly) σ-full.
The weak version of the following result is proved in (Almeida et al., 2014, Proposition 3.2). The same
proof applies to the strong case.
Proposition 4.3. Let V and W be two (strongly) σ-full pseudovarieties such that V ⊆ W. If W is
(respectively strongly) σ-PR, then so is V.
Note that S is trivially σ-full for every implicit signature σ. Combining Theorem 3.1 with Corollary 4.2
and Proposition 4.3, we obtain the following result.
Corollary 4.4. Let σ be a pure unary signature containing κ. Then a pseudovariety V is σ-PR if and only
if it is σ-full.
We do not know whether the hypothesis on the signature can be dropped in Corollary 4.4.
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
19
4.2 The group case
We now consider the case of pseudovarieties of groups, for the signature κ.
Recall that a group is LERF (locally extendible residually finite) if every finitely generated subgroup
is closed in the profinite topology. We say that a pseudovariety of groups H is LERF if, for every finite
alphabet X, the relatively free group ΩκX H is LERF. By a classical result of Hall (1950), the pseudovariety
G of all finite groups is LERF.
By (Margolis et al., 2001, Proposition 2.9), G is in fact the only nontrivial extension-closed pseudovariety of groups that is LERF. On the other hand, it is easy to check that, for the pseudovariety Ab of all
finite Abelian groups, every subgroup of ΩκX Ab is closed (Delgado, 1998, Proposition 3.8).
A slightly different notion of strongly κ-PR pseudovariety was considered by Pin and Reutenauer (1991)
and Delgado (2001) (where it is simply called PR). Instead of property (3.2), the following property is
considered:
L+ = hLiσ .
(4.2)
Compared to (3.2), the topological closure in the right hand side of (4.2) has been dropped. As observed
in (Almeida et al., 2014, end of Section 4), Equation (4.2) fails for the pseudovariety S and the implicit
signature κ, for L = a+ b+ , since aω b ∈ L+ \ hLiσ . However, the two notions coincide for the pseudovariety G (Pin and Reutenauer, 1991, Theorem 2.4). With same argument, we generalize this result to LERF
pseudovarieties.
Lemma 4.5. Let V be a pseudovariety. If V satisfies (4.2) for a subset L of ΩσX V, then (3.2) also holds.
If V is a LERF pseudovariety of groups and σ = κ, then (4.2) holds for rational subsets L of ΩκX V.
Proof: Since for L ⊆ ΩσX V, the inclusions hLiσ ⊆ hLiσ ⊆ L+ always hold, it is clear that (4.2) implies
(3.2).
For the second part, we argue as in (Almeida et al., 2014, p. 4). Let L be a rational subset of ΩκX V.
Then, hLiκ = (L∪L−1 )+ is rational in ΩκX V. By a well-known theorem of Anissimow and Seifert (1975),
the subgroup hLiκ is therefore finitely generated. Hence, hLiκ is closed in ΩκX V, by the assumption that
V is a LERF pseudovariety. Finally, we have L+ ⊆ hLiκ , hence L+ ⊆ hLiκ , which, combined with the
reverse inclusion, which always holds, yields the result.
It can be shown easily that a κ-PR pseudovariety of groups is LERF (see Delgado (1997)). Thus,
a pseudovariety of groups is strongly κ-PR if and only if it is PR in the sense of Delgado (2001). In
(Delgado, 2001, Corollary 3.9), it is also established that every “weakly PR” pseudovariety of groups is
κ-full, a result which is considerably improved in the present paper, in the form of Corollaries 4.2 and 4.4.
It was conjectured by Pin and Reutenauer (1991) that G is strongly κ-PR. Their conjecture was reduced
to another conjecture, namely that the product of finitely many finitely generated subgroups of a free
group is closed. The latter conjecture was established by Ribes and Zalesskiı̆ (1993). Combining with
Proposition 4.3 and Corollary 4.2, we obtain the following result.
Theorem 4.6. A pseudovariety of groups is strongly κ-PR if and only if it is strongly κ-full.
The diagram in Fig. 1 summarizes the results of this subsection. We say that a pseudovariety of groups H
is strong RZ if in every finitely generated free H-group, any finite product of finitely generated subgroups
is closed. We say that H is weak RZ if, in every finitely generated free H-group, any finite product of
finitely generated closed subgroups is also closed.
20
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
Strong
κ-full
Thm. 4.6
Strong
κ-PR
(Delgado, 1997, Thm. 4.2.1)
Strong
RZ
LERF
Weak
κ-full
Cor. 4.4
Weak
κ-PR
Weak
RZ
Fig. 1: Summary of results: pseudovarieties of groups
References
J. Almeida. Implicit operations on finite J-trivial semigroups and a conjecture of I. Simon. J. Pure Appl.
Algebra, 69(3):205–218, 1991.
J. Almeida. Finite Semigroups and Universal Algebra. World Scientific, Singapore, 1995.
J. Almeida. Some algorithmic problems for pseudovarieties. Publ. Math. Debrecen, 54 Suppl.:531–552,
1999.
J. Almeida. Finite semigroups: an introduction to a unified theory of pseudovarieties. In G. M. S. Gomes,
J.-É. Pin, and P. V. Silva, editors, Semigroups, Algorithms, Automata and Languages, pages 3–64,
Singapore, 2002. World Scientific.
J. Almeida. Profinite semigroups and applications. In V. B. Kudryavtsev and I. G. Rosenberg, editors,
Structural Theory of Automata, Semigroups, and Universal Algebra, volume 207 of NATO Science
Series II: Mathematics, Physics Chemistry, New York, 2005. Springer. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Structural Theory of Automata, Semigroups and Universal Algebra, Montréal,
Québec, Canada, 7-18 July 2003.
J. Almeida and A. Costa. Infinite-vertex free profinite semigroupoids and symbolic dynamics. J. Pure
Appl. Algebra, 213:605–631, 2009.
J. Almeida and B. Steinberg. On the decidability of iterated semidirect products and applications to
complexity. Proc. London Math. Soc., 80:50–74, 2000a.
J. Almeida and B. Steinberg. Syntactic and global semigroup theory, a synthesis approach. In J. C. Birget,
S. W. Margolis, J. Meakin, and M. V. Sapir, editors, Algorithmic Problems in Groups and Semigroups,
pages 1–23. Birkhäuser, 2000b.
J. Almeida and M. V. Volkov. Subword complexity of profinite words and subgroups of free profinite
semigroups. Int. J. Algebra Comput., 16(2):221–258, 2006.
J. Almeida and M. Zeitoun. The equational theory of ω-terms for finite R-trivial semigroups. In M. Branco
and G. Gomes, editors, Semigroups and Languages, pages 1–23. World Scientific, 2004.
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
21
J. Almeida and M. Zeitoun. An automata-theoretic approach to the word problem for ω-terms over r.
Theoret. Comput. Sci., 370(1–3):131–169, 2007.
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, and M. Zeitoun. Tameness of pseudovariety joins involving R. Monatsh. Math.,
146:89–111, 2005.
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, and M. Zeitoun. Closures of regular languages for profinite topologies. Semigroup
Forum, 89:20–40, 2014.
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, and M. Zeitoun. McCammond normal forms for free aperiodic semigroups
revisited. LMS J. Comput. Math., 18:130–147, 2015.
A. W. Anissimow and F. D. Seifert. Zur algebraischen Charakteristik der durch kontext-freie Sprachen
definierten Gruppen. Elektron. Informationsverarbeit. Kybernetik, 11(10–12):695–702, 1975.
C. J. Ash. Inevitable graphs: a proof of the type II conjecture and some related decision procedures. Int.
J. Algebra Comput., 1:127–146, 1991.
K. Auinger. A new proof of the Rhodes type II conjecture. Int. J. Algebra Comput., 14:551–568, 2004.
K. Auinger. On the decidability of membership in the global of a monoid pseudovariety. Int. J. Algebra
Comput., 20(2):181–188, 2010.
K. Auinger and B. Steinberg. On the extension problem for partial permutations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,
131:2693–2703, 2003.
K. Auinger and B. Steinberg. A constructive version of the Ribes-Zalesskiı̆ product theorem. Math. Z.,
250:287–297, 2005.
L. Chaubard, J.-É. Pin, and H. Straubing. Actions, wreath products of C-varieties and concatenation
product. Theor. Comp. Sci., 356:73–89, 2006.
J. C. Costa. Free profinite locally idempotent and locally commutative semigroups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra,
163(1):19–47, 2001.
J. C. Costa and M. L. Teixeira. Tameness of the pseudovariety LSl. Int. J. Algebra Comput., 14:627–654,
2004.
M. Delgado. The type II theorem and hyperdecidability of pseudovarieties of groups. PhD thesis, Univ.
Porto, 1997. In Portuguese.
M. Delgado. Abelian poinlikes of a monoid. Semigroup Forum, 56:339–361, 1998.
M. Delgado. On the hyperdecidability of pseudovarieties of groups. Int. J. Algebra Comput., 11:753–772,
2001.
M. Hall. A topology for free groups and related groups. Ann. of Math., 52:127–139, 1950.
K. Henckell. Pointlike sets: the finest aperiodic cover of a finite semigroup. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 55:
85–126, 1988.
22
J. Almeida, J. C. Costa, M. Zeitoun
K. Henckell, S. W. Margolis, J.-É. Pin, and J. Rhodes. Ash’s type II theorem, profinite topology and
Malc’ev products. I. Int. J. Algebra Comput., 1:411–436, 1991.
B. Herwig and D. Lascar. Extending partial automorphisms and the profinite topology on free groups.
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 352:1985–2021, 2000.
R. P. Hunter. Some remarks on subgroups defined by the Bohr compactification. Semigroup Forum, 26:
125–137, 1983.
M. Huschenbett and M. Kufleitner. Ehrenfeucht-Fraissé Games on Omega-Terms. In E. W. Mayr and
N. Portier, editors, STACS’14), volume 25 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs),
pages 374–385. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2014.
M. Lothaire. Combinatorics on Words. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1983.
S. W. Margolis, M. V. Sapir, and P. Weil. Closed subgroups in pro-V topologies and the extension problem
for inverse automata. Int. J. Algebra Comput., 11:405–446, 2001.
J. P. McCammond. Normal forms for free aperiodic semigroups. Int. J. Algebra Comput., 11:581–625,
2001.
A. Moura. The word problem for ω-terms over DA. Theor. Comp. Sci., pages 6556–6569, 2011.
J. Pin. Topologies for the free monoid. J. Algebra, 137(2):297–337, 1991.
J.-É. Pin and Ch. Reutenauer. A conjecture on the Hall topology for the free group. Bull. London Math.
Soc., 23:356–362, 1991.
T. Place and M. Zeitoun. Going higher in the first-order quantifier alternation hierarchy on words. In
J. Esparza, P. Fraigniaud, T. Husfeldt, and E. Koutsoupias, editors, ICALP’14, volume 8573 of Lect.
Notes Comp. Sci., pages 342–353, 2014a.
T. Place and M. Zeitoun. Separating regular languages with first-order logic. In CSL-LICS’14, pages
75:1–75:10, 2014b.
T. Place and M. Zeitoun. Separation and the Successor Relation. In E. W. Mayr and N. Ollinger, editors,
STACS’15), volume 30 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 662–675.
Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2015.
T. Place and M. Zeitoun. Separating regular languages with first-order logic. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 12(5):1–30, 2016.
J. Rhodes and B. Steinberg. The q-theory of finite semigroups. Springer Monographs in Mathematics.
Springer, 2009.
L. Ribes and P. A. Zalesskiı̆. On the profinite topology on a free group. Bull. London Math. Soc., 25:
37–43, 1993.
B. Steinberg. A delay theorem for pointlikes. Semigroup Forum, 63:281–304, 2001.
Factoriality and the Pin-Reutenauer procedure
23
B. Steinberg. A combinatorial property of ideals in free profinite monoids. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 214:
1693–1695, 2010.
H. Straubing. Aperiodic homomorphisms and the concatenation product of recognizable sets. J. Pure
Appl. Algebra, 15:319–327, 1979.
| 4math.GR
|
1
Adversarial Generation of Training Examples:
Applications to Moving Vehicle License Plate
Recognition
arXiv:1707.03124v3 [cs.CV] 10 Nov 2017
Xinlong Wang, Zhipeng Man, Mingyu You, Chunhua Shen
Abstract—Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) have attracted much research attention recently, leading to impressive
results for natural image generation. However, to date little success was observed in using GAN generated images for improving
classification tasks. Here we attempt to explore, in the context
of license plate recognition for moving cars using a moving
camera, whether it is possible to generate synthetic training data
using GAN to improve recognition accuracy. With a carefullydesigned pipeline, we show that the answer is affirmative. First,
a large-scale image set is generated using the generator of GAN,
without manual annotation. Then, these images are fed to a deep
convolutional neural network (DCNN) followed by a bidirectional
recurrent neural network (BRNN) with long short-term memory
(LSTM), which performs the feature learning and sequence
labelling. Finally, the pre-trained model is fine-tuned on real
images.
Our experimental results on a few data sets demonstrate
the effectiveness of using GAN images: an improvement of 7.5
recognition accuracy percent points (pp) over a strong baseline
with moderate-sized real data being available. We show that the
proposed framework achieves competitive recognition accuracy
on challenging test datasets. We also leverage the depthwise
separate convolution to construct a lightweight convolutional
recurrent neural network (LightCRNN), which is about half
size and 2× faster on CPU. Combining this framework and
the proposed pipeline, we make progress in performing accurate
recognition on mobile and embedded devices.
Index Terms—Generative adversarial network (GAN), Convolutional neural network (CNN), Bidirectional recurrent neural
network (BRNN), Long short-term memory (LSTM), Depthwise
separate convolution.
I. I NTRODUCTION
S GANs [6, 27] have been developed to generate compelling natural images, we attempt to explore whether
GAN-generated images can help training as well as real images. GANs are used to generate images through an adversarial
training procedure that learns the real data distribution. Most
of previous work focuses on using GANs to manipulate images
for computer graphics applications [14, 29]. However, to date
little success was observed in using GAN generated images for
improving classification tasks. To our knowledge, we are one
of the first to exploit GAN-generated images to supervised
recognition tasks and gain remarkable improvements. For
many tasks, labelled data are limited and hard to collect, not to
A
X. Wang, Z. Man, M. You are with College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai China (e-mail: [email protected]).
C. Shen is with School of Computer Science, The University of Adelaide,
SA 5005, Australia (e-mail: [email protected]).
mention the fact that training data with manual annotation typically costs tremendous effort. This problem becomes worse in
the deep learning era as in general deep learning methods are
much more data-hungry. Applications are hampered in these
fields when training data for the task is scarce. Inspired by the
excellent photo-realistic quality of images generated by GANs,
we explore its effectiveness in supervised learning tasks.
More specifically, in this work we study the problem of
using GAN images in the context of license plate recognition
(LPR). License plate recognition is an important research
topic, as a crucial part in intelligent transportation systems
(ITS). A license plate is a principal identifier of a vehicle. This
binding relationship creates many applications using license
plate recognition, such as traffic control, electronic payment
systems and criminal investigation. Most research on LPR
have been focused on using a fixed camera to capture car
license images. However, the task of using a moving camera
to capture license plate images of moving cars can be much
more challenging. This task is not well studied in the literature.
Moreover, Lack of a large labelled training data for this task
renders data-hungry deep learning methods to not well.
Recent advances in deep learning algorithms bring multiple
choices which can achieve great performance in specific
datasets. A notable cascade framework [18] applies a sliding
window to feature extraction, which perform the LPR without
segmentation. Inspired by the work of [18, 33] and CNN’s
strong capabilities of learning informative representations from
images, we combine deep convolutional neural network and
recurrent neural network in a single framework, and recognize
a license plate without segmentation, which views a license
plate as a whole object and learns its inner rules from data.
Independent of the deep models being applied, to achieve a
high recognition accuracy requires a large amount of annotated
license plate image data. However, due to privacy issues,
image data of license plates are hard to collect. Moreover,
manual annotation is expensive and time-consuming. What
is more, LPR is a task with regional characteristic: license
plates differ in countries and regions. For many of regions, it
is even harder to collect sufficient samples to build a robust and
high-performance model. To tackle this problem, we propose
a novel pipeline which leverages GAN-generated images in
training. The experiments on Chinese license plates show its
effectiveness especially when training data are scarce.
To achieve this goal, first, we use computer graphic scripts
to synthesize images of license plates, following the fonts,
colors and composition rules. Note that these synthetic images
2
are not photo realistic, as it is very difficult to model the
complex distribution of real license plate images by using
hand-crafted rules only. This step is necessary as we use these
synthetic images as the input to the GAN. Thus the GAN
model refines the image style to make images look close
to real images. At the same time the content, which is the
actual vehicle plate number, is kept. This is important as we
need the plate number—the ground-truth label—for supervised
classification in the sequel. We then train a CycleGAN [44]
model to generate realistic images of license plates with labels,
by learning the mapping from synthetic images to real images.
The main reason for using CycleGAN is that, we do not have
paired input-output examples for training the GAN. As such,
methods like pixel-to-pixel GAN [14] are not applicable. CycleGAN can learn to translate between domains without paired
input-output examples. An assumption of CycleGAN is that
there is an underlying relationship between the two domains.
In our case, this relationship is two different renderings of
the same license plate: synthetic graphics versus real photos.
We rely on CycleGAN to learn the translation from synthetic
graphics to real photos.
Finally, we train the convolutional recurrent neural network
[33] on the GAN images, and fine-tune it on real images, as
illustrated in Fig. 1(b) in the manner of curriculum learning
paradigm [4].
The core insight behind this is that we exploit the license
number from synthetic license plates and the photo-realistic
style from real license plates, which combines knowledgebased (i.e., hand-crafted rules) and learning-based data-driven
approaches. Applying the proposed pipeline, we achieve significantly improved recognition accuracy on moderate-sized
training sets of real images. Specifically, the model trained
on 25% training data (50k) achieves an impressive accuracy
of 96.3%, while the accuracy is 96.1% when trained on the
whole training set (200k) without our approach.
Besides the proposed framework, we consider semisupervised learning using unlabeled images generated by deep
convolutional GAN (DCGAN) [27] as an add-on, for the
sake of comparison between our approach and existing semisupervised method using GAN images.
To run the deep LPR models on mobile devices, we replace
the standard convolutions with depthwise separate convolutions [34] and construct a lightweight convolutional RNN. This
architecture efficiently decreases the model size and speed up
the inference process, with only a small reduction in accuracy.
The main contributions of this work can be summarized as
follows.
•
We propose a pipeline that applies GAN-generated images to supervised learning as auxiliary data. Furthermore, we follow a curriculum learning strategy to train
the system with gradually more complex training data. In
the first step, we use a large number of GAN-generated
images whose appearance is simpler than real images,
and a large lexicon of license plate numbers1 . At the
1 Recall that the vehicle license plate numbers/letters follow some rules or
grammars. Our system learns the combinatorial rules with BRNN on the large
number of GAN images.
same time, the first step finds a good initialization of
the appearance model for the second step. By employing
relatively small real-world images, the system gradually
learns how to handle complex appearance patterns.
• We show the effectiveness of Wasserstein distance loss
in CycleGAN training, which aids data variety and converged much better. The original CycleGAN uses a leastsquares loss for the adversarial loss, which is more stable
than the standard maximum-likelihood loss. We show
that the Wasserstein distance loss as in Wasserstein GAN
(WGAN) [3] works better for CycleGAN as well.
• We show that when and why GAN images help in
supervised learning.
• We build a small and efficient LightCRNN, which is half
model size and 2× faster on CPU.
The rest of paper is arranged as follows. In Section 2 we
review the related works briefly. In Section 3 we describe
the details of networks used in our approach. Experimental
results are provided in Section 4, and conclusions are drawn
in Section 5.
II. R ELATED W ORK
In this section, we discuss the relevant work on license
plate recognition, generative adversarial networks and data
generation for training.
A. License Plate Recognition
Existing methods on license plate recognition (LPR) can
be divided into two categories: segmentation-based [7, 9, 23]
and segmentation free-based [18]. Segmentation-based methods firstly segment the license plate into individual characters, and then recognize the segmented character respectively
using a classifier. Segmentation algorithms mainly consist
of projection-based [9, 23] and connected component-based
[2, 16]. After the segmentation, template matching based
[5, 28] and learning based [16, 21, 38] algorithms can be used
to tackle this character level classification task.
Learning based algorithms including support vector machine [38], hidden Markov model (HMM) [21] and neural
networks [16, 35] are more robust than the template matching based methods since they extract discriminative features.
However, the segmentation process loses information about
inner rules in license plates and the segmentation performance
has a significant influence on the recognition performance.
Li and Shen [18] proposed a cascade framework using deep
convolutional neural networks and LSTMs for license plate
recognition without segmentation, where a sliding window is
applied to extracting feature sequence. Our method is also
a segmentation-free approach based on framework proposed
by [33], where a deep CNN is applied for feature extracting
directly without a sliding window, and a bidirectional LSTM
network is used for sequence labeling.
B. Generative Adversarial Networks
The generative adversarial networks [6] train a generative
model and discriminative model simultaneously via an adversarial process. Deep convolutional generative adversarial
3
(a) The CycleGAN Model
(b) Our proposed Pipeline
Fig. 1. (a) The architecture of the CycleGAN model, which is essential for our framework. There are two generators (or mapping functions): G and F . S
and R represent the synthetic and real images respectively. Adversarial loss (Lad ) is used to evaluate the performance of each generator and corresponding
discriminator. Besides, the cycle consistency loss (Lcyc ) is employed to evaluate whether G and F are cycle-consistent. (b) The pipeline of proposed approach.
There are two components: a generative adversarial model and a convolutional recurrent neural network. The “Synthetic Data” represent the labeled images
generated by our scripts.
networks (DCGANs) [27] provide a stable architecture for
training GANs. Conditional GAN [22] generate images with
specific class labels by conditioning on both the generator and
discriminator. Not only class labels, GANs can be conditioned
on text descriptions [29] and images [14], which build a textto-image or image-to-image translation.
Zhu et al. [44] proposed the CycleGAN. It learns a mapping
between two domains without paired images, upon which our
model builds. In order to use unpaired images for training,
CycleGAN introduces the cycle consistency loss to fulfill the
idea of “If we translate from one domain to another and back
again we must arrive where we start”.
The work of Wasserstein GAN (WGAN) [3] designed a
training algorithm that provides some techniques to improve
the stability of learning and prevent from mode collapse.
Beyond that, GANs have also achieved impressive results in
image inpainting [25], representation learning [32] and 3D
object generation [39].
However, to date, little results were reported to demonstrate
the GAN images’ effectiveness in supervised learning. We
propose to use CycleGAN [44] and techniques in WGAN to
generate labeled images and show that these generated images
indeed help improve the performance of recognition.
C. Data Generation for Training
Typically, supervised deep networks achieve acceptable
performance only with a large amount of labeled examples
available. The performance often improves as the dataset
size increases. However, in many cases, it is hard or even
impossible to obtain a large number of labeled data.
Synthetic data are used to show great performance in text
localisation [10] and scene text recognition [15], without
manual annotation. Additional synthetic training data [19]
yields improvements in person detection [40], font recognition
[36] and semantic segmentation [30]. But, the knowledgebased approach which hard encodes knowledge about what the
real images look like are fragile, as the generated examples
often look like toys to discriminative model when compared to
real images. Zheng et al. [43] use unlabeled samples generated
by a vanilla DCGAN for semi-supervised learning, which
slightly improves the person re-identification performance.
In this work, we combine knowledge-based approach and
learning-based approach, to generate labeled license plates
from generator of GANs for supervised training. For comparison, we also perform a semi-supervised learning using
unlabeled GAN images.
III. N ETWORK OVERVIEW
In this section, the pipeline of the proposed method is
described. As shown in Fig. 1, we train the GAN model using
synthetic images and real images simultaneously. We then use
the generated images to train a convolutional BRNN model.
Finally we fine tune this model using real images. Below is
an illustration of the two components, namely, the GAN and
the convolutional RNN, in detail.
A. Generative Adversarial Network
The generative adversarial networks generally consists of
two sub-networks: a generator and a discriminator. The adversarial training process is a minimax game: both subnetworks aim to minimize its own cost and maximize the
other’s cost. This adversarial process leads to a converged
status that the generator outputs realistic images and the
discriminator extracts deep features. The GAN frameworks
we used in this pipeline are Cycle-Consistent Adversarial
Networks (CycleGAN) [44] with the Wasserstein distance loss
as in Wasserstein GAN (WGAN) [3].
CycleGAN As our goal is to learn a mapping that maps
synthetic images into real images, namely domain S to domain
R, we use two generators: G : S → R, F : R → S,
and two discriminators DS and DR . The core insight behind
this is that, we not only want to have G(S) ≈ R, but also
F (G(S)) ≈ S, which is an additional restriction used to
prevent the well-known problem of mode collapse, where all
input images map into the same output image. As illustrated
in Fig. 1(a), mapping functions G and F both should be
cycle-consistent. We follow the settings in [44]. The generator
network consists of two stride-2 convolutions, six residual
4
blocks and two fractionally-strided convolutions with stride
1
2 , i.e., deconvolutions that upsample the feature maps. For
the discriminator networks, we use 70 × 70 PatchGANs [14],
which, instead of classifying the entire image, classifies 70×70
image patches to be fake or real. The objective is defined as
the sum of adversarial loss and cycle consistency loss:
TABLE I
C ONFIGURATION OF THE CONVOLUTIONAL RNN MODEL . “ K ”, “ S ” AND
“ P ” REPRESENT KERNEL SIZE , STRIDE AND PADDING SIZE .
Layer Type
Bidirectional-LSTM
Bidirectional-LSTM
ReLu
BatchNormalization
Convolution
ReLu
BatchNormalization
Convolution
MaxPooling
ReLu
Convolution
ReLu
BatchNormalization
Convolution
MaxPooling
ReLu
Convolution
ReLu
BatchNormalization
Convolution
MaxPooling
ReLu
Convolution
MaxPooling
ReLu
Convolution
Input
L(G, F, DS , DR ) =LLSGAN (G, DR , S, R)
+ LLSGAN (F, DS , R, S)
(1)
+ λLcyc (G, F ).
Here LLSGAN (G, DR , S, R) evaluates the adversarial leastsquares loss of the mapping function G : S → R and
discriminator DR :
LLSGAN (G, DR , S, R) =Er∼pdata (r) [(DR (r) − 1)2 ]
+ Es∼pdata (s) [DR (G(s))2 ].
(2)
G tries to minimize (2) against DR that tries to maximize it:
while G aims to generate images G(s) that look similar to
real images, DR tries to distinguish between G(s) and real
images r, and vice versa. Cycle consistency loss is defined as
below:
Lcyc (G, F ) =Es∼pdata (s) [kF (G(s)) − sk1 ]
+ Er∼pdata (r) [kG(F (r)) − rk1 ].
(3)
The optimization of (3) brings F (G(s)) back to s, G(F (r))
to r. λ in (1) represent the strength of the cycle consistency.
Details of CycleGAN can be referred to [44].
Wasserstein GAN We apply the techniques proposed in
[3] to CycleGAN and propose the CycleWGAN. In training
of GANs, the method of measuring the distance between two
distances plays a crucial role. A poor evaluation of distance
makes it hard to train, even causes mode collapse. The EarthMover (EM) distance, a.k.a. Wasserstein distance, is used
when deriving the loss metric, as it is more sensible and
converges better. The EM distance between two distributions
Pr and Ps is defined as below:
EM (Pr , Ps ) =
E(x,y)∼λ [kx
Qinf
λ∈ (Pr ,Ps )
− yk],
(4)
which can be interpreted as the “mass” must be moved to
transform the distribution Pr into the distribution Ps . To make
it tractable, we apply the Kantorovich-Rubinstein duality and
get
EM (Pr , Ps ) = sup Ex∼Pr [f (x)] − Ex∼Ps [f (x)],
(6)
we can find a parameterized family of functions {fw }w∈W
which are K-Lipschitz for some constant K such that kf kL ≤
K. Then this problem is transformed to
max Ex∼Pr [f (x)] − Ex∼Ps [f (x)].
w∈W
LWGAN (G, DR , S, R) =Er∼pdata (r) [DR (r)]
− Es∼pdata (s) [DR (G(s))].
(8)
•
•
•
The same to LLSGAN (F, DS , R, S).
Update discriminators diter times before each update of
generators.
Clamp the parameters of discriminators to a fixed range
after each gradient update.
Use RMSProp [31] for optimization, instead of Adam
[17].
B. Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network
where f are 1-Lipschitz function. To solve the problem
max Ex∼Pr [f (x)] − Ex∼Ps [f (x)],
range after each gradient update. In the training of GAN, the
discriminator play the role of f above.
Specifically, we make four modifications based on CycleGAN described above:
• Replace the original adversarial loss (2) with:
(5)
kf kL ≤1
kf kL ≤1
Configurations
#hidden units: 256
#hidden units: 256
#filters:512, k:2 × 2, s:1, p:0
#filters:512, k:2 × 2, s:1, p:0
s:1 × 2, p:1 × 0
#filters:512, k:3 × 3, s:1, p:1
#filters:512, k:3 × 3, s:1, p:1
s:1 × 2, p:1 × 0
#filters:256, k:3 × 3, s:1, p:1
#filters:256, k:3 × 3, s:1, p:1
p:2 × 2, s:2
#filters:128, k:3 × 3, s:1, p:1
p:2 × 2, s:2
#filters:64, k:3 × 3, s:1, p:1
160 × 48 × 3 RGB images
(7)
In order to enforce a Lipschitz constraint that parameters w
range in a compact space, we clamp the weights to a fixed
The framework that we use is a combination of deep
convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks
based on [33]. The recognition procedure consists of three
components: Sequence feature learning, sequence labelling
and sequence decoding, corresponding to the convolutional
RNN architecture of convolutional layers, recurrent layers and
decoding layer one to one. The overall configurations are
presented in Table I.
Sequence feature learning CNNs have demonstrated impressive ability of extracting deep features from image [37].
An 8-layer CNN model is applied to extracting sequence
5
TABLE II
C OMPOSITION OF THE REAL DATASETS . T HE TWO DATASETS ARE COLLECTED SEPARATELY BUT BOTH COME FROM OPEN ENVIRONMENTS .
Name
Dataset-1
Dataset-2
Width
100 ∼ 160
50 ∼ 150
Height
30 ∼ 50
15 ∼ 40
Time
Day, Night
Day, Night
Style
Blue, Yellow
Blue, Yellow
features, as shown in Table I. Batch normalization is applied
in 3rd, 5th, 7th and 8th layers, and rectified linear units are
followed after all these 8 layers. All three channel in RGB
images are used: images are resized to 160 × 48 × 3 before
fed to networks. After the 8-layer extraction, a sequence of
feature vectors is outputted, as the informative representation
of the raw images, and the input for the recurrent layers.
Sequence labelling The RNNs have achieved great success in sequential problems such as handwritten recognition
and language translation. To learn contextual cues in license
numbers, a deep bidirectional recurrent neural network is built
on the top of CNNs. To avoid gradient vanishing, LSTM is
employed, instead of vanilla RNN unit. LSTM is a special
type of RNN unit, which consists of a memory cell and gates.
The form of LSTM in [41] is adopted in this paper, where a
LSTM contains a memory cell and four multiplicative gates,
namely input, input modulation, forget and output gates. A
fully-connected layer with 68 neurons is added behind the
last BiLSTM layer, for the 68 classes of label—31 Chinese
characters, 26 letters, 10 digits and “blank”. Finally the feature
sequence is transformed into a sequence of probability distributions X = {x1 , x2 , ..., xT } where T is the sequence length
of input feature vectors and the superscript can be interpreted
as time step. xt is a probability distribution of time t: xtk is
interpreted as the probability of observing label k at time t,
which is a probability distribution over the set L(T ) where T
is the length and L contains all of the 68 labels, as illustrated
in Fig. 2.
Sequence decoding Once we have the sequence of probability distributions, we transform it into character string using
best path decoding [8]. The probability of a specific path π
given an input x is defined as below:
Provinces
30/31
4/31
Training set size
203,774
45,139
Test set size
9,986
5,925
Fig. 2. License plate recognition confidence map. The top is the license plate
to be predicted. The color map is the recognition probabilities from the linear
projections of output by the last LSTM layer. The recognition probabilities
on 68 classes are shown vertically (with classes order from top to bottom:
0-9, A-Z, Chinese characters and “blank”). Confidence increases from green
to white.
(9)
Fig. 3. Some Samples of Dataset-1. The license plates in Dataset-1 come
from 30 different provinces of all 31 provinces. All of them are captured
from real traffic monitoring scenes.
As described above, yπt t means the probability of observing
label πt at time t, which is visualized in Fig. 2. For the best
path decoding, the output is the labelling of most probable
path:
l = B(π ∗ ),
(10)
Training method We train the networks with stochastic
gradient descent (SGD). The labelling loss is derived using
Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) [8]. Then the optimization algorithm Adadelta [42] is applied, as it converges
fast and requires no manual setting of a learning rate.
p(π | x) =
T
Y
yπt t .
t=1
where π ∗ = arg max p(π | x).
π
Here we define the operation B as removing all blanks and
repeated labels from the path. For example, B(aa − ab − −) =
B(−a−aa−b) = aab. As there is no tractable globally optimal
decoding algorithm for this problem, the best path decoding is
an approximate method that assumes the most probable path
corresponds to the most probable labelling, which simply takes
the most active output at each time step as π ∗ and then map π ∗
onto l . More sophisticated decoding methods such as dynamic
programming may lead to better results.
IV. E XPERIMENTS
A. Datasets
We collect two datasets in which images are captured from
a wide variety of real traffic monitoring scenes under various
viewpoints, blurring and illumination. As listed in Table II,
Dataset-1 contains a training set of 203,774 plates and a
test set of 9,986 plates; Dataset-2 contains a training set of
45,139 plates and a test set of 5,925 plates. Some sample
images are shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4. For Chinese license
6
TABLE III
C OMPARISON OF MODELS USING DIFFERENT FRAMEWORKS ON
DATASET-1. R ECOGNITION ACCURACY (%) AND CHARACTER
RECOGNITION ACCURACY (%) ACCURACY ARE LISTED .
SVM + ANN [20]
CNN + LSTMs
Fig. 4. Some samples of Dataset-2. All of license plates in Dataset-2 are
collected from four provinces, from different channels with Dataset-1.
plates, the first character is a Chinese character that represents
province. While there are 31 abbreviations for all of the
provinces, Dataset-1 contains 30 classes of them and Dataset2 contains 4 classes of them, which means the source areas of
our data covers a wide range of ground-truth license plates.
Our datasets are very challenging and comprehensive due to
the extreme diversity of character patterns, such as different
resolution, illumination and character distortion. Note that
these two datasets come from different sources and do not
follow the same distribution.
B. Evaluation Criterion
In this work, we evaluate the model performance in terms
of recognition accuracy and character recognition accuracy,
which are evaluated at the license plate level and character
level, respectively. Recognition accuracy is defined as the
number of license plates that each character is correctly
recognized divided by the total number of license plates:
Number of correctly recognized license plates
.
Number of all license plates
(11)
Character recognition accuracy is defined as the number of
correctly recognized characters divided by the number of all
characters:
Number of correctly recognized characters
CRA =
.
Number of all characters
(12)
Besides, we compute the top-N recognition accuracy as
well. Top-N recognition accuracy is defined as the number
of license plates that ground-truth label is in top N predictions divided by the total number of license plates. The
recognition accuracy defined above is a special case of the
top-N recognition with N equals 1. Benefiting from LSTMs
sequence output, we can easily obtain the top-N recognition
accuracy by making a beam search decoding on the output
logits. The top-N recognition accuracy make sense in criminal
investigation: an accurate list of candidates can be provided
when searching for a specific license plate, which means a
high top-N accuracy promise a low missing rate.
RA =
C. Implementation Details
The recognition framework The convolutional RNN
framework is similar to that of [33] and [18], We implement it
using Tensorflow [1]. The images are first resized to 160 × 48
and then fed to the recognition framework. We modify the last
fully-connected layer to have 68 neurons according to the 68
classes of label—31 Chinese characters, 26 letters, 10 digits
RA (top-1)
68.2
96.1
CRA
82.5
98.9
and “blank”. Note that, the decoding method that we use in
the above decoding process, independent of top-1 or top-N , is
based on a greedy strategy. It means that we get the best path—
most probable path, not the most probable labelling. Graves
et al. [8] find the almost best labeling using prefix search
decoding, which achieves a slight improvement over best path
decoding, at the cost of expensive computation and decoding
time. Same as [18, 33], we adopt the best path decoding in
inference.
Synthetic data We generate 200,000 synthetic license plates
as our SynthDataset using computer graphics scripts, following
the fonts, composition rules and colors, adding some Gaussian
noise, motion blurring and affine deformation. The composition rules is according to the standard of Chinese license
plates, such as the second character must be letter and at most
two letters (exclude “I” and “O”) in last five characters, as
depicted in Fig. 6. Some synthetic license plates are shown in
Fig. 5(a).
GAN training and testing We first train the CycleGAN
model on 4,500 synthetic blue license plates from SynthDataset and 4,500 real blue license plates from training set
of Dataset-1, as depicted in Fig. 1. We follow the settings in
[44]. The λ in Equation (1) is set to 10 in our experiments.
All the images are scaled to 143 × 143, cropped to 128 × 128
and randomly flipped for data augmentation. We use Adam
with β1 = 0.5, β2 = 0.999 and learning rate of 0.0002. We
save the model for each epoch and stop training after 30
epochs. When testing, we use the last 20 models to generate
100,000 blue license plates. The same goes for yellow license
plates. Finally, we obtain 200,000 license plates that acquire
the license number and realistic style from SynthDataset and
Dataset-1 separately. When applying the training method of
WGAN, diter is set to 5, and the parameters of discriminator
are clamped to [−0.01, 0.01] after each gradient update. Note
that only the training set of Dataset-1 is used when training
the GAN models. For data augmentation, 200,000 images are
randomly cropped to obtain 800,000 images before fed to the
convolutional RNN models.
D. Evaluation
The convolutional RNN baseline model We train the
baseline models on two datasets directly. As shown in Table
V, we achieve a top-1 recognition accuracy of 96.1% and
character accuracy of 98.9% on Dataset-1, without additional
data. This baseline already yields a high accuracy, especially
the top-3 and top-5 accuracy which are 98.0% and 98.5%. On
Dataset-2, the recognition accuracy and character recognition
accuracy are 94.5% and 98.4%, as shown in Table VI.
For comparison and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the
CRNN framework on the task of license plate recognition,
7
(a) Script Images
(b) CycleGAN Images
(c) CycleWGAN Images
(d) Real Images
Fig. 5. (a) The examples of license plates generated by our scripts (simple graphics with hand-crafted rules; in other words, colors and character deformation
are hard-coded). Note that these images are generated with labels. (b) The examples of license plates generated by CycleGAN [44] model, using synthetic
images as input. (c) The examples of license plates generated by CycleWGAN model, in which WGAN [3] techniques are applied. (d) Real license plates
from Dataset-1.
TABLE IV
C OMPARISON OF MODELS THAT USE DIFFERENT GENERATED IMAGES FOR
SUPERVISED LEARNING WITHOUT REAL IMAGES . T HE PERFORMANCE IS
EVALUATED ON TEST SET OF DATASET-1. “R ANDOM ” REPRESENTS THE
RANDOMLY INITIALIZED MODEL . R ECOGNITION ACCURACY (%) AND
CHARACTER RECOGNITION ACCURACY (%) ARE LISTED . “CRA-C” IS THE
RECOGNITION ACCURACY (%) OF C HINESE CHARACTER WHICH IS THE
FIRST CHARACTER , AND “CRA-NC” IS THE RECOGNITION ACCURACY
(%) OF LETTERS AND DIGITS WHICH ARE THE LAST SIX CHARACTERS .
Random
Script
CycleGAN
CycleWGAN
RA (top-1)
0.0
4.4
34.6
61.3
CRA
0.8
30.0
82.8
90.6
CRA-C
0.0
20.0
41.3
66.2
9k
50k
200k (All)
Methods
Baseline
Script
CycleWGAN
Baseline
Script
CycleWGAN
Baseline
Script
CycleWGAN
RA (top-1)
86.1
90.2
93.6
93.1
95.2
96.3
96.1
96.7
97.6
CRA
94.9
97.0
98.4
97.9
98.8
99.2
98.9
99.1
99.5
Baseline
CycleWGAN
RA (top-1)
94.5
96.2
CRA
98.4
99.2
top-3
97.6
98.7
top-5
98.1
99.1
CRA-NC
0.9
31.7
89.8
94.8
TABLE V
C OMPARISON OF USING DIFFERENT VOLUMES OF THE REAL DATA AND
SYNTHETIC DATA GENERATED BY DIFFERENT METHODS ON DATASET-1,
I . E ., SCRIPTS AND C YCLE WGAN MODEL . I T MEANS THE GENERATED
IMAGES ARE USED FOR TRAINING FIRST, THEN SPECIFIC PROPORTION OF
DATASET-1 IS FED TO THE MODEL . T HE PERFORMANCE IS EVALUATED ON
THE TEST SET OF DATASET-1. T HE CRNN BASELINE THAT TRAINED ON
DATASET-1 ONLY IS ALSO PROVIDED . R ECOGNITION ACCURACY (%),
CHARACTER RECOGNITION ACCURACY (%), TOP -3 RECOGNITION
ACCURACY (%) AND TOP -5 RECOGNITION (%) ACCURACY ARE LISTED .
Training Data
TABLE VI
C OMPARISON OF THE BASELINE ON DATASET-2. W E FINE - TUNE THE
MODEL ON DATASET-2 AFTER PRETRAINING ON C YCLE WGAN IMAGES .
R ECOGNITION ACCURACY (%), CHARACTER RECOGNITION ACCURACY
(%), TOP -3 RECOGNITION ACCURACY (%) AND TOP -5 RECOGNITION (%)
ACCURACY ARE SHOWN .
top-3
90.1
94.6
96.8
96.4
97.7
98.3
98.0
98.6
98.9
top-5
92.3
95.6
97.4
97.2
98.1
98.8
98.5
98.8
99.2
we also evaluate the performance of EasyPR [20] on test set
of Dataset-1, which is a popular open source software using
support vector machines to locate plates and a single hidden
layer neural network for character-level recognition. EasyPR
is a segmentation based method. As shown in Table III, our
approach yield a superior accuracy.
Fig. 6. Standard Chinese license plate. The first character is Chinese character
representing region. The second must be a letter. And the last 5 characters
can be letter (exclude “I” and “O”) or digit, but there should be no more than
two letters.
Synthetic data only To directly evaluate the effectiveness
of the data generated by different methods, we train the
models using synthetic data generated by script, CycleGAN
and CycleWGAN respectively. Then accuracy evaluations are
performed, which are listed in Table IV.
When we only use the SynthDataset which is generated
by script for training, the recognition accuracy on test set
of Dataset-1 is just 4.4%. To rule out the possibility of
random initialization, we take a test on the model with random
initial weights, which produces a result of 0.0% and 0.8%
on recognition accuracy and character recognition accuracy.
It means these synthetic images generated by script do help.
However, compared with real license plates in Fig. 3, our
synthetic license plates generated by script are overly simple.
The CycleGAN images achieve a recognition accuracy of
8
34.6%. The improvement of recognition accuracy from 4.4%
to 34.6% demonstrates that the distribution generated by
CycleGAN is much closer to the real distribution, which means
that the generator performs a good mapping from synthetic
data to real data with the regularization of discriminator. Some
of the samples are shown in Fig. 5(b). However, we observe
the phenomenon that the outputs of generator tend to converge
to a specific style, which shows some kind of mode collapse
[6, 13, 27], the well-known problem of GAN training.
As shown in Fig. 5(c), the CycleWGAN images show
more various styles of texture and colors. Part of them are
really undistinguishable from real images. Although to the
naked eyes the images quality may be slightly lower, which
is similar to the observation in [3], CycleWGAN shows
aggressive rendering ability that prevents from mode collapse.
When we use the CycleWGAN images, we yield 61.3 RA,
which indicates the CycleWGAN images make a relatively
improvements of 1300% compared to the script images. Note
that, the recognition accuracy of non-Chinese characters (last
six characters) has already achieved 94.8% without using any
real data, as letters and digits are much easier than Chinese
characters.
The results are consistent with the appearance of the images
in Fig. 5. We conclude that the trained model is more accurate
if the synthetic data is more real.
Curriculum learning To further explore these synthetic
images’ significance, we then fine tune the pre-trained models
on Dataset-1. Thus, we follow a curriculum learning strategy
to train the system with gradually more complex training data.
As in the first step, the large number of synthetic images whose
appearance is simpler than real images, and a large lexicon of
license plate numbers. At the same time, the first step finds
a good initialization of the appearance model for the second
step which uses real images.
As shown in Table V, with the help of CycleWGAN images,
we obtain an impressive improvement of 1.5 pp over such a
strong baseline.
To provide more general insights about the ability of
GAN to generate synthetic training data, we adopt a crossdataset strategy where the CycleWGAN is trained on data
from Dataset-1 and produces images that will be used to
train a model on Dataset-2. Thus, the model pre-trained on
CycleWGAN images is fine tuned on Dataset-2, with the
same procedure. We observe an improvement of 1.7 pp (from
94.5% to 96.2%) in Table VI. The experimental results on the
Dataset-1 and Dataset-2 demonstrate the effectiveness: even
on a strong baseline, these CycleWGAN images effectively
yield remarkable improvements.
Smaller datasets, more significant improvements What
if we only have a small real dataset? It is a common problem faced by some special tasks, especially when related to
personal privacy.
We sample a small set of 9,000 ground-truth labeled license
plate images from Dataset-1, For the first method, we train
our recognition networks directly using these 9,000 license
plates. The second method is the pipeline proposed in Section
1 that we use this dataset to train a GAN model and generate
synthetic license plates. We then fine-tune this pre-trained
model using 9,000 real images.
As shown in Table V, when we add 800k GAN images to
the network’s training, our method significantly improves the
LPR performance. We observe an impressive improvement of
7.5 pp (from 86.1% to 93.6%). When using 50,000 real images
for the fine-tuning instead of 9,000, we also observe impactful
improvement of 3.2 pp (from 93.1% to 96.3%). It is clear that
the improvement is more remarkable with a smaller training
set of real images. What is more, the model trained on 9,000
training set and GAN images deliver better performance than
the model trained on a training set with size of 50,000. This
comparison can also be found between 50k and 200k in Table
V. It means that we can train a better model on a smaller real
training set using this method, validating the effectiveness of
the proposed pipeline.
Fig. 7. License plate samples generated by a DCGAN model trained on part
of Dataset-1. Through the all-in-one method, they are mixed with real license
plates to regularize the CRNN model.
TABLE VII
C OMPARISON OF MIXING DIFFERENT AMOUNT OF REAL IMAGES WITH
DCGAN IMAGES . F OR ALL - IN - ONE METHOD , 50,000 DCGAN IMAGES IS
MIXED WITH REAL IMAGES . R ECOGNITION ACCURACY (%), CHARACTER
RECOGNITION ACCURACY (%), TOP -3 RECOGNITION ACCURACY (%) AND
TOP -5 RECOGNITION (%) ACCURACY ARE SHOWN .
Dataset-1-9k
Dataset-1-9k + All in one
Dataset-1-50k
Dataset-1-50k + All in one
Dataset-1-200k
Dataset-1-200k + All in one
RA (top-1)
86.1
78.1
93.1
92.6
96.1
96.0
CRA
94.9
92.8
97.9
97.7
98.9
98.9
Unlabeled DCGAN images To compare the effectiveness
of labeded CycleWGAN images and unlabeled images generated by DCGAN [27], we train a DCGAN model to generate
unlabeled images, and apply the all-in-one [24, 32, 43] method
to them for a semi-supervised learning. All-in-one is an
approach that takes all generated unlabeled data as one class.
DCGAN provides a stable architecture for training GANs
and can only generate unlabeled images. It consists of one
generator and one discriminator. We follow the settings in [27].
For the generator, we use four fractionally-strided convolutions
after projecting and reshaping a 100-dim random vectors to
4 × 4 × 16 to generate images with size of 64 × 64 × 3. For the
discriminator, a fully-connected layer following four stride2 convolutions with kernel size of 5 × 5 is used to perform
a binary classification that whether the image is real or fake.
We train the DCGAN model on 46,400 images from Dataset-1,
and then use the model to generate 50,000 images by inputting
100-dim random vectors in which each entry is in a range of
[−1, 1]. Some samples are shown in Fig. 7.
9
For all of our license plates, there are 68 different characters,
which means 68 classes. We create a new character class,
and every character in generated license plate is assigned to
this class. Same as [43], these generated images and ground
truth images are mixed and trained simultaneously. As shown
in Table VII, we explore the effect of adding these 50,000
images to Dataset-1-9k, Dataset-1-50k and Dataset-1-200k.
The results show that the DCGAN images fail to obtain
improvements, which is opposite to the results of [43]. We
think it is because that the bias in the task of person reidentification does not exist in LPR.
Fig. 8. Random images that consist of random value at each pixel. They are
input to a trained model to produce the condition distribution which can be
viewed as the knowledge of the model.
E. Interpretation
Thus far we empirically prove the effectiveness of CycleGAN generated images for recognition. However from a
theoretical perspective, it is not clear about the effect of
images generated by GAN, in real learning tasks. Thus, we
perform some visualizations to interpret the effectiveness of
GAN images.
The knowledge of a model can be viewed as the conditional
distribution it produces over outputs given an input [11, 26].
Inspired by this insight, we input 5,000 random-generated
images to models, then average the outputs of last fullyconnected layer together as a confidence map to simulate
the output distribution. Some samples of random images are
shown in Fig. 8. The confidence map namely y is illustrated
in Fig. 2, where ytk can interpreted as probability of observing
label k at time t as described in Section 3.2.
Here, we mainly explain this question: why do those labeled
GAN images yield further improvements? First, the model
trained on script-generated images only is visualized, as shown
in Fig. 11(a). We observe that the bottom of the first column
is blue while the top is green, which means that it is more
probable to observe Chinese characters in the place of license
plate’s first character. On the contrary, the rest places tend to
be digits and letters.
When we observe the model trained on CycleWGAN images only, the composition rules of license plates are more
clear, as illustrated in Fig. 11(b). Besides, the columns next to
the first column show concentrated probabilities in middle position, which indicate the second character tends to be letters.
These observations match the ground truth rules explicitly. The
above results indicate the knowledge of composition rules that
are hard-coded in scripts is learned by the model and help in
sequence labelling.
Once the model pre-trained on CycleWGAN images is
fine-tuned on real images instead of script images, these
general rules are still clear. However, the model trained on
real images directly learns the non-general features, e.g., very
high probability of “9” which is caused by the many “9”s in
training set, as depicted in Fig. 11(d). The non-general features
cause over-fitting. Besides, we pick the images that make up
the improvements. About 35% of them are caused by the first
character (Chinese character), and about one quarter of them
are caused by the confusing pairs like “0” & “D”, “8” & “B”
and “5” & “S”. It means that these CycleWGAN images help
extract discriminative features of license plates.
In a word, the knowledge and prior hard-coded in script
does help; the GAN images soften these knowledge and
make output distribution be close to ground-truth distribution
which lead to further improvements. It is consistent with the
experimental results in Section 4.4. When training data is
large, the knowledge in additional GAN images help less
because the real training set is sufficiently large to carry most
of these knowledge.
F. Model Compression
To further meet requirements of inference on mobile and
embedded devices, we replace the standard convolution with
depth-wise separable convolution [34] and adopt the hyperparameter width multiplier proposed by [12]. A depth-wise
separate convolution contains a depth-wise convolution and a
1×1 (point-wise) convolution. For depth-wise convolution, a
single filter is applied to each input channel separately. Then a
pointwise convolution is applied which is a 1×1 convolution
that combines different channels to create new features. This
factorized convolution efficiently reduces the model size and
computation.
With stride one and padding, a standard convolution filtering
on a H ×W ×M feature map R outputs a H ×W ×N feature
map O. Here, H and W represent the height and width of
the feature map. M and N are the depth of the input and
output feature map. While the size of convolution kernel K is
F × F × M × N where F denotes the spatial dimension of
the kernel, we can compute the output feature map O as:
X
Op,q,n =
Ki,j,m,n · Rp+i−1,q+j−1,m .
(13)
i,j,m
During this forward computation, the computation cost is
defined as below:
Cstandard = F · F · M · N · H · W.
(14)
As for the depth-wise convolution, the temporary output
feature map is computed as:
X
Ôp,q,m =
K̂i,j,m · Rp+i−1,q+j−1,m .
(15)
i,j
Then we perform a 1 × 1 convolution to produce the final
output feature map of this depth-wise separate convolution.
Over all, the computation cost of the depth-wise separate
convolution is:
F · F · M · H · W + M · N · H · W.
(16)
To explore the trade off between the accuracy and inference
speed, we bring in a hyper-parameter called width multiplier.
At each layer, we multiply both input depth M and output
10
depth N by α. Then the computation cost of the separate
depth-wise convolution becomes:
Cseparate = F · F · αM · H · W + αM · αN · H · W. (17)
Dividing the Cseparate by Cstandard , we then get the ratio of
computation cost:
Cseparate
F · F · αM · H · W + αM · αN · H · W
=
Cstandard
F ·F ·M ·N ·H ·W
(18)
1
2 1
= α + α 2.
N
F
If we use the default width multiplier of 1.0 and 3×3 depthwise separable convolutions, the computation cost becomes
about 9 times less than the original standard convolution, while
the output depth N is large.
Based on this efficient depth-wise separable convolution and
the existing CRNN framework, we construct a lightweight
convolutional recurrent neural network and denote it as
“LightCRNN”. Note that only the convolutions are modified,
while the parameters and computation cost in LSTM and the
fully-connected layer in it are kept. The entire architecture is
defined in Table VIII.
TABLE VIII
C ONFIGURATION OF THE L IGHT CRNN MODEL . “ K ”, “ S ” AND “ P ”
REPRESENT KERNEL SIZE , STRIDE AND PADDING SIZE . E ACH
CONVOLUTION IS FOLLOWED BY BATCH NORMALIZATION AND R E LU
NONLINEARITIES .
Layer Type
Bidirectional-LSTM
Bidirectional-LSTM
Conv
Depthwise Conv
Conv
Depthwise Conv
MaxPooling
Conv
Depthwise Conv
MaxPooling
Conv
Depthwise Conv
Conv
Depthwise Conv
Conv
Input
Configurations
#hidden units: 256
#hidden units: 256
#filters:512, k:1 × 1, s:1, p:0
k:2 × 2, s:1, p:0
#filters:512, k:1 × 1, s:1, p:0
k:2 × 2, s:1, p:0
s:1 × 2, p:1 × 0
#filters:512, k:1 × 1, s:1, p:0
k:3 × 3, s:1, p:1
s:1 × 2, p:1 × 0
#filters:256, k:1 × 1, s:1, p:0
k:3 × 3, s:2, p:1
#filters:128, k:1 × 1, s:1, p:0
k:3 × 3, s:2, p:1
#filters:64, k:3 × 3, s:1, p:1
160 × 48 × 3 RGB images
TABLE X
R ESULTS ON TEST SET OF DATASET-3. F INE - TUNING ON THE MODEL
PRE - TRAINED ON THE C YCLE WGAN IMAGES IMPROVES THE BASELINE .
R ECOGNITION ACCURACY (%) AND CHARACTER RECOGNITION
ACCURACY (%) ACCURACY ARE LISTED .
Baseline
CycleWGAN +
PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASES THE MODEL SIZE
AND SPEEDS UP THE INFERENCE .
RA (top-1)
96.5
97.0
98.6
Size
40.3
44.2
44.2
Fig. 9. Some samples of Dataset-3. The videos are shot when both the source
and target objects are moving.
Fig. 10. Some samples of CycleWGAN images for moving LPR. The
CycleWGAN models are trained using script images and training set of
Dataset-3.
TABLE IX
C OMPARISON OF USING DIFFERENT MODELS . A LL ARE TRAINED ON
DATASET-1 AND TESTED ON ITS TEST SET. R ECOGNITION ACCURACY (%),
MODEL SIZE (MB) AND INFERENCE SPEED (FPS) ARE LISTED . T HE
Model
LightCRNN
1.2 LightCRNN
1.2 LightCRNN + CycleWGAN images
forward inference. As shown in Table IX, the LightCRNN
not only efficiently decreases the model size from 71.4M B
to 40.3M B and speeds up the inference from 7.2F P S to
13.9F P S, but also increase the recognition accuracy. It is
probably because this LightCRNN reduce the overfitting of the
model. To adjust the trade off between latency and accuracy,
we apply the width multiplier of 1.2. This 1.2 LightCRNN
brings another improvement of 0.5 pp. We then apply the
proposed pipeline which leverages CycleWGAN image data
and yields an improvement of 1.6 pp.
Thus, the combination of our proposed pipeline and architecture make it more close to perform accurate recognition on
mobile and embedded devices.
Speed
13.9
11.5
11.5
We evaluate the proposed LightCRNN on Dataset-1 without
GPU. The following experiments are carried out on a workstation with 2.40 GHz Intel(R) Xeon(R) E5-2620 CPU and 64GB
RAM. The LightCRNN models are trained and tested using
TensorFlow [1]. Only a single core is used when we perform
RA (top-1)
89.4
92.1
CRA
97.6
98.0
G. Moving LPR
We further validate our pipeline on more complicated data.
We shoot in a moving car and capture the license plates of
other vehicles. Both the viewpoint and target object are moving
fast and irregularly. This data is much more hard than the
normal monitoring data which is collected at settled location
and angle. The LPR task then becomes more challenging and
we denote it as the task of moving LPR, which is with wide
applications in driving assistance, surveillance and mobile
robotics, etc.
The moving LPR has two main bottlenecks. First, this
harder task needs more examples and large-scale data are
expensive to collected, as you can not just export the data from
11
monitoring camera but have to shoot videos in various regions
to meet the requirement of diversity. Second, the models need
to be more efficient when you deploy the systems in vehicles
or drones. Our proposed pipeline eases up the first bottleneck,
and the proposed LightCRNN helps the latter.
These images are collected in Suzhou, a normal Chinese
city. They cover various situatiions, such as night, highway,
crossroad and so on. Some samples are shown in Fig. 9. After
the images are annotated and cropped, we obtain 22026 license
plates, namely, the Dataset-3. 2000 of them are splitted as test
set of Dataset-3.
Considering the trade off between accuracy and latency,
we adopt the 1.2x LightCRNN in our following experiments.
We first train a model using the training set of Dataset-3 and
evaluate on the corresponding test set. We obtain a recognition
accuracy of 89.4%. Then the proposed pipeline is applied.
First, we train the CycleWGAN using script images and the
training set of Dataset-3. Both are 20k images. Then we feed
the script images to the trained generators and obtain 800k
synthetic CycleWGAN images. We show some samples in Fig.
10. The recognition model is pre-trained on the CycleWGAN
images and fine-tuned on the training set of Dataset-3. As thus,
we yield an improvement of 2.7 pp, as listed in Table X. It
indicates that our methods work well on even more hard LPR
scenario.
V. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we integrate the GAN images into supervised
learning, i.e., license plate recognition. Using our method,
large-scale realistic license plates with arbitrary license numbers are generated by a CycleGAN model equipped with
WGAN techniques. The convolutional RNN baseline network
is trained on GAN images first, and then real images in a
curriculum learning manner.
Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed pipeline
brings significant improvements on different license plates
datasets. The significance of GAN-generated data is magnified
when real annotated data is limited. Furthermore, the question
that why and when do these GAN images help in supervised
learning is answered, using clear visualizations. We also propose a lightweight convolutional RNN model using depth-wise
separate convolution, to perform fast and efficient inference.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The work was supported by the Shanghai Natural Science
Foundation (No. 17ZR1431500).
R EFERENCES
[1] M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro, G. S.
Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, et al. Tensorflow: Large-scale
machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1603.04467, 2016.
[2] C. N. E. Anagnostopoulos, I. E. Anagnostopoulos, V. Loumos, and
E. Kayafas. A license plate-recognition algorithm for intelligent
transportation system applications. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent
transportation systems, 7(3):377–392, 2006.
[3] M. Arjovsky, S. Chintala, and L. Bottou. Wasserstein generative
adversarial networks. In D. Precup and Y. W. Teh, editors, Proceedings
of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70
of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 214–223, International Convention Centre, Sydney, Australia, 06–11 Aug 2017. PMLR.
[4] Y. Bengio, J. Louradour, R. Collobert, and J. Weston. Curriculum
learning. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine
Learning, pages 41–48, 2009.
[5] S. Goel and S. Dabas. Vehicle registration plate recognition system using
template matching. In Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC),
2013 International Conference on, pages 315–318. IEEE, 2013.
[6] I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley,
S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In
Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 2672–2680,
2014.
[7] C. Gou, K. Wang, Y. Yao, and Z. Li. Vehicle license plate recognition
based on extremal regions and restricted boltzmann machines. IEEE
Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(4):1096–1107,
2016.
[8] A. Graves, S. Fernández, F. Gomez, and J. Schmidhuber. Connectionist temporal classification: labelling unsegmented sequence data with
recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd international
conference on Machine learning, pages 369–376. ACM, 2006.
[9] J.-M. Guo and Y.-F. Liu. License plate localization and character
segmentation with feedback self-learning and hybrid binarization techniques. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(3):1417–1424,
2008.
[10] A. Gupta, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Synthetic data for text
localisation in natural images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference
on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2315–2324, 2016.
[11] G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean. Distilling the knowledge in a neural
network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015.
[12] A. G. Howard, M. Zhu, B. Chen, D. Kalenichenko, W. Wang,
T. Weyand, M. Andreetto, and H. Adam. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1704.04861, 2017.
[13] D. J. Im, C. D. Kim, H. Jiang, and R. Memisevic. Generating images
with recurrent adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.05110,
2016.
[14] P. Isola, J.-Y. Zhu, T. Zhou, and A. A. Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In Proceedings of IEEE
Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017.
[15] M. Jaderberg, K. Simonyan, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Synthetic
data and artificial neural networks for natural scene text recognition.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2227, 2014.
[16] J. Jiao, Q. Ye, and Q. Huang. A configurable method for multi-style
license plate recognition. Pattern Recognition, 42(3):358–369, 2009.
[17] D. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
[18] H. Li and C. Shen. Reading car license plates using deep convolutional
neural networks and lstms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.05610, 2016.
[19] P. Lim, C. K. Goh, and K. C. Tan. Evolutionary cluster-based synthetic
oversampling ensemble (eco-ensemble) for imbalance learning. IEEE
transactions on cybernetics, 2017.
[20] R. Liu and M. Li. Easypr. https://github.com/liuruoze/EasyPR, 2016.
[21] D. Llorens, A. Marzal, V. Palazón, and J. Vilar. Car license plates
extraction and recognition based on connected components analysis and
hmm decoding. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, pages 357–
362, 2005.
[22] M. Mirza and S. Osindero. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1411.1784, 2014.
[23] S. Nomura, K. Yamanaka, O. Katai, H. Kawakami, and T. Shiose. A
novel adaptive morphological approach for degraded character image
segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 38(11):1961–1975, 2005.
[24] A. Odena. Semi-supervised learning with generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01583, 2016.
[25] D. Pathak, P. Krahenbuhl, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and A. A. Efros.
Context encoders: Feature learning by inpainting. In Proceedings of the
IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages
2536–2544, 2016.
[26] G. Pereyra, G. Tucker, J. Chorowski, Ł. Kaiser, and G. Hinton. Regularizing neural networks by penalizing confident output distributions.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06548, 2017.
[27] A. Radford, L. Metz, and S. Chintala. Unsupervised representation
learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1511.06434, 2015.
[28] S. Rasheed, A. Naeem, and O. Ishaq. Automated number plate
recognition using hough lines and template matching. In Proceedings of
the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, volume 1,
pages 24–26, 2012.
[29] S. Reed, Z. Akata, X. Yan, L. Logeswaran, B. Schiele, and H. Lee.
Generative adversarial text to image synthesis. In Proceedings of
International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 3, 2016.
[30] G. Ros, L. Sellart, J. Materzynska, D. Vazquez, and A. M. Lopez. The
12
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
synthia dataset: A large collection of synthetic images for semantic
segmentation of urban scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference
on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3234–3243, 2016.
S. Ruder. An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747, 2016.
T. Salimans, I. Goodfellow, W. Zaremba, V. Cheung, A. Radford, and
X. Chen. Improved techniques for training gans. In Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems, pages 2226–2234, 2016.
B. Shi, X. Bai, and C. Yao. An end-to-end trainable neural network
for image-based sequence recognition and its application to scene text
recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine
Intelligence, 2016.
L. Sifre. Rigid-motion scattering for image classification. PhD thesis,
Ph. D. thesis, 2014.
D. Tao, X. Lin, L. Jin, and X. Li. Principal component 2-d long shortterm memory for font recognition on single chinese characters. IEEE
transactions on cybernetics, 46(3):756–765, 2016.
Z. Wang, J. Yang, H. Jin, E. Shechtman, A. Agarwala, J. Brandt, and
T. S. Huang. Deepfont: Identify your font from an image. In Proceedings
of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 451–
459. ACM, 2015.
Y. Wei, Y. Zhao, C. Lu, S. Wei, L. Liu, Z. Zhu, and S. Yan. Cross-modal
retrieval with cnn visual features: A new baseline. IEEE transactions
on cybernetics, 47(2):449–460, 2017.
Y. Wen, Y. Lu, J. Yan, Z. Zhou, K. M. von Deneen, and P. Shi. An
algorithm for license plate recognition applied to intelligent transportation system. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,
12(3):830–845, 2011.
J. Wu, C. Zhang, T. Xue, W. T. Freeman, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Learning
a probabilistic latent space of object shapes via 3d generative-adversarial
modeling. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages
82–90, 2016.
J. Yu, D. Farin, C. Krüger, and B. Schiele. Improving person detection
using synthetic training data. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2010 17th
IEEE International Conference on, pages 3477–3480. IEEE, 2010.
W. Zaremba, I. Sutskever, and O. Vinyals. Recurrent neural network
regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.2329, 2014.
M. D. Zeiler. Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1212.5701, 2012.
Z. Zheng, L. Zheng, and Y. Yang. Unlabeled samples generated by
gan improve the person re-identification baseline in vitro. In The IEEE
International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Oct 2017.
J.-Y. Zhu, T. Park, P. Isola, and A. A. Efros. Unpaired image-to-image
translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In The IEEE
International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Oct 2017.
13
(a) 800k script images
(b) 800k CycleWGAN images
(c) 200k real after 800k CycleGAN images
(d) 200k real images
Fig. 11. Comparison of models trained on different datasets. The recognition probabilities on 68 classes are shown vertically (with classes order from top to
bottom: 0-9, A-Z, Chinese characters and “blank”). Confidence increases from green to white. (a) The model trained on 800k script-generated images only.
The blue area indicates a higher probability to be digits and letters. (b) The model trained on 800k CycleWGAN images only. Here shows a more clear color
distribution which indicates the composition rule of the Chinese license plates. (c) The model pre-trained on 800k CycleWGAN images and fine-tuned on
200k real images. (d) The model trained on 200k real images only. The high confidence in the red bounding box represent the not discriminative features.
| 1cs.CV
|
A
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
arXiv:1407.0904v2 [cs.MS] 4 Jul 2014
Fabio Luporini, Imperial College London
Ana Lucia Varbanescu, University of Amsterdam
Florian Rathgeber, Imperial College London
Gheorghe-Teodor Bercea, Imperial College London
J. Ramanujam, Louisiana State University
David A. Ham, Imperial College London
Paul H.J. Kelly, Imperial College London
The numerical solution of partial differential equations using the finite element method is one of the key
applications of high performance computing. Local assembly is its characteristic operation. This entails the
execution of a problem-specific kernel to numerically evaluate an integral for each element in the discretized
problem domain. Since the domain size can be huge, executing efficient kernels is fundamental. Their optimization is, however, a challenging issue. Even though affine loop nests are generally present, the short
trip counts and the complexity of mathematical expressions make it hard to determine a single or unique
sequence of successful transformations. Therefore, we present the design and systematic evaluation of COFFEE, a domain-specific compiler for local assembly kernels. COFFEE manipulates abstract syntax trees
generated from a high-level domain-specific language for PDEs by introducing domain-aware composable
optimizations aimed at improving instruction-level parallelism, especially SIMD vectorization, and register
locality. It then generates C code including vector intrinsics. Experiments using a range of finite-element
forms of increasing complexity show that significant performance improvement is achieved.
Categories and Subject Descriptors: G.1.8 [Numerical Analysis]: Partial Differential Equations - Finite
element methods; G.4 [Mathematical Software]: Parallel and vector implementations
General Terms: Design, Performance
Additional Key Words and Phrases: Finite element integration, local assembly, compilers, optimizations,
SIMD vectorization
ACM Reference Format:
Fabio Luporini, Ana Lucia Varbanescu, Florian Rathgeber, Gheorghe-Teodor Bercea, J. Ramanujam, David
A. Ham, and Paul H. J. Kelly, 2014. COFFEE: an Optimizing Compilerfor Finite Element Local Assembly.
ACM Trans. Arch. & Code Opt. V, N, Article A (January YYYY), 22 pages.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/0000000.0000000
This research is partly funded by the MAPDES project, by the Department of Computing at Imperial College London, by EPSRC through grants EP/I00677X/1, EP/I006761/1, and EP/L000407/1, by NERC grants
NE/K008951/1 and NE/K006789/1, by the U.S. National Science Foundation through grants 0811457 and
0926687, by the U.S. Army through contract W911NF-10-1-000, and by a HiPEAC collaboration grant. The
authors would like to thank Dr. Carlo Bertolli, Dr. Lawrence Mitchell, and Dr. Francis Russell for their
invaluable suggestions and their contribution to the Firedrake project.
Author’s addresses: Fabio Luporini & Florian Rathgeber & Gheorghe-Teodor Bercea & Paul H. J. Kelly, Department of Computing, Imperial College London; Ana Lucia Varbanescu, Informatics Institute, University
of Amsterdam; David A. Ham, Department of Computing and Department of Mathematics, Imperial College
London; J. Ramanujam, iCenter for Computation and Technology and the School of Elec. Engr.& Comp. Sci.,
Louisiana State University.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted
without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that
copies show this notice on the first page or initial screen of a display along with the full citation. Copyrights
for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, to redistribute to lists, or to use any component
of this work in other works requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Permissions may be requested
from Publications Dept., ACM, Inc., 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701, New York, NY 10121-0701 USA, fax +1 (212)
869-0481, or [email protected].
c YYYY ACM 1539-9087/YYYY/01-ARTA $15.00
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/0000000.0000000
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:2
F. Luporini et al.
1. INTRODUCTION
In many fields such as computational fluid dynamics, computational electromagnetics
and structural mechanics, phenomena are modelled by partial differential equations
(PDEs). Numerical techniques, like the finite volume method and the finite element
method, are widely employed to approximate solutions of these PDEs. Unstructured
meshes are often used to discretize the computational domain, since they allow an
accurate representation of complex geometries. The solution is sought by applying
suitable numerical operations, or kernels, to the entities of a mesh, such as edges,
vertices, or cells. On standard clusters of multicores, typically, a kernel is executed
sequentially by a thread, while parallelism is achieved by partitioning the mesh and
assigning each partition to a different node or thread. Such an execution model, with
minor variations, is adopted, for example, in [Markall et al. 2013], [Logg et al. 2012],
[AMCG 2010], [DeVito et al. 2011].
The time required to apply the numerical kernels is a major issue, since the equation
domain needs to be discretized into an extremely large number of cells to obtain a
satisfactory approximation of the PDE, possibly of the order of trillions [Rossinelli et al.
2013]. For example, it has been well established that mesh resolution is critical in the
accuracy of numerical weather forecasts. However, operational forecast centers have a
strict time limit in which to produce a forecast - 60 minutes in the case of the UK Met
Office. Producing efficient kernels has a direct scientific payoff in higher resolution,
and therefore more accurate, forecasts. Computational cost is a dominant problem in
computational science simulations, especially for those based on finite elements, which
are the subject of this paper. We address, in particular, the well-known problem of
optimizing the local assembly phase of the finite element method [Russell and Kelly
2013; Olgaard and Wells 2010; Knepley and Terrel 2013; Kirby et al. 2005], which can
be responsible for a significant fraction of the overall computation run-time, often in
the range 30-60%. With respect to these studies, we propose a novel set of composable
code transformations targeting, for the first time, instruction-level parallelism - with
emphasis on SIMD vectorization - and register locality.
During the assembly phase, the solution of the PDE is approximated by executing
a problem-specific kernel over all cells, or elements, in the discretized domain. In this
work, we focus on relatively low order finite element methods, in which an assembly
kernel’s working set is usually small enough to fit the L1 cache. Low order methods
are by no means exotic: they are employed in a wide variety of fields, including climate
and ocean modeling, computational fluid dynamics, and structural mechanics. High
order methods such as the spectral element method [Vos et al. 2010] commonly require
different algorithms to solve PDEs and therefore are excluded from our study.
An assembly kernel is characterized by the presence of an affine, often non-perfect
loop nest, in which individual loops are rather small: their trip count rarely exceeds
30, and may be as low as 3 for low order methods. In the innermost loop, a problemspecific, compute intensive expression evaluates a two dimensional array, representing
the result of local assembly in an element of the discretized domain. With such a kernel
structure, we focus on aspects like minimization of floating-point operations, register
allocation and instruction-level parallelism, especially in the form of SIMD vectorization.
Achieving high-performance is non-trivial. The complexity of the mathematical expressions, often characterized by a large number of operations on constants and small
matrices, makes it hard to determine a single or specific sequence of transformations
that is successfully applicable to all problems. Loop trip counts are typically small and
can vary significantly, which further exacerbates the issue. A compiler-based approach
is, therefore, the only reasonable option to obtain close-to-peak performance in a wide
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
A:3
range of different local assembly kernels. Optimizations like padding, generalized loopinvariant code motion, vector-register tiling, and expression splitting, as well as their
composition, are essential. but none are supported by state-of-the-art polyhedral and
vendor compilers. BLAS routines could theoretically be employed, although a fairly
complicated control and data flow analysis would be required to automate identification and extraction of matrix-matrix multiplies. In addition, as detailed in Section 5.9,
the small dimension of the matrices involved and the potential loss in data locality can
limit or eliminate the performance gain of this approach.
In order to overcome the constraints of the available compilers and specialized linear
algebra libraries, we have automated a set of generic and model-driven code transformations in COFFEE1 , a compiler for optimizing local assembly kernels. COFFEE is
integrated with Firedrake [Firedrake contributors 2014], a system for solving PDEs
through the finite element method based on the PyOP2 abstraction [Rathgeber et al.
2012; Markall et al. 2013]. All problems expressible with this framework are supported
by COFFEE, including equations that can be found at the core of real-world simulations, such as those used in our performance evaluation. In evaluating our code transformations for a range of relevant problems, we vary two key parameters that impact
solution accuracy and kernel cost: the polynomial order of the method (we investigate
from p = 1 to p = 4) and the geometry of elements in the discretized domain (2D triangle, 3D tetrahedron, 3D prism). From the point of view of the generated code, these two
parameters directly impact the size of both loop nests and mathematical expressions,
as elaborated in Section 5.2.
Our experiments show that the original generated code for non-trivial assembly kernels, despite following state-of-the-art techniques, remains suboptimal in the context
of modern multicore architectures. Our domain-aware cost-model-driven sequence of
code transformations, aimed at improving SIMD vectorization and register data locality, can result in performance improvements up to 4.4× over original kernels, and
around 70% of the test cases obtain a speed up greater than 2×. The contributions of
this paper are
(1) An optimization strategy for finite element local assembly that exploits domain
knowledge and goes beyond the limits of both vendor and research compilers.
(2) The design and implementation of a compiler that automates the proposed code
transformations for any problems expressible in Firedrake.
(3) A systematic analysis using a suite of examples of real-world importance that is
evidence of significant performance improvements on two Intel architectures, a
Sandy Bridge CPU and the Xeon Phi.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we provide some background on local
assembly, show code generated by Firedrake and emphasize the critical computational
aspects. Section 3 describes the various code transformations, highlighting when and
how domain knowledge has been exploited. The design and implementation of our
compiler is discussed in Section 4. Section 5 shows performance results. Related work
is described in Section 6, while Section 7 reviews our contributions in the light of our
results, and identifies priorities for future work.
2. BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATING EXAMPLES
Local assembly is the computation of contributions of a specific cell in the discretized
domain to the linear system which yields the PDE solution. The process consists of
numerically evaluating problem-specific integrals to produce a matrix and a vector
[Olgaard and Wells 2010; AMCG 2010], whose sizes depend on the order of the method.
1 COFFEE
stands for COmpiler For FinitE Element local assembly.
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:4
F. Luporini et al.
Input: element matrix (2D array, initialized to
0), element coordinates (array), coefficient fields (array,
e.g. velocity)
Output: element matrix (2D array)
- Compute Jacobian from coordinates
- Define basis functions
- Compute element matrix in an affine loop nest
Fig. 1: Structure of a local assembly kernel
This operation is applied to all cells in the discretized domain. In this work we focus on
local matrices, or “element matrices”, which are more costly to compute than element
vectors.
Given a finite element description of the input problem, expressed through the
domain-specific Unified Form Language (UFL) [Alnæs et al. 2014], Firedrake employs
the FEniCS form compiler (FFC) [Kirby and Logg 2006] to generate a C-code kernel
implementing assembly using a numerical quadrature. This kernel can be applied to
any element in the mesh, which follows from a mathematical property of the finite element method. The evaluation of a local matrix can be reduced to integration on a fixed
“reference” element — a special element that does not belong to the domain — after
a suitable change of coordinates. Firedrake triggers the compilation of an assembly
kernel using an available vendor compiler, and manages its (parallel) execution over
all elements in the mesh. As already explained, the subject of this paper is to enhance
this execution model by adding an optimization stage prior to the generation of C code.
The structure of a local assembly kernel is shown in Figure 1. The inputs are a
zero-initialized two dimensional array used to store the element matrix, the element’s
coordinates in the discretized domain, and coefficient fields, for instance indicating
the values of velocity or pressure in the element. The output is the evaluated element
matrix. The kernel body can be logically split into three parts:
(1) Calculation of the Jacobian matrix, its determinant and its inverse required for the
aforementioned change of coordinates from the reference element to the one being
computed.
(2) Definition of basis functions used, intuitively, to interpolate the contribution to the
PDE solution over the element. The choice of basis functions is expressed in UFL
directly by users. In the generated code, they are represented as global read-only
two dimensional arrays (i.e., using static const in C) of double precision floats.
(3) Evaluation of the element matrix in an affine loop nest, in which the integration is
performed.
Table I shows the variable names we will use in the upcoming code snippets to refer to
the various kernel objects.
Table I: Type and variable names used in the various listings to identify local assembly
objects.
Object name
Determinant of the Jacobian matrix
Inverse of the Jacobian matrix
Coordinates
Fields
Numerical integration weights
Basis functions (and derivatives)
Element matrix
Type
double
double
double**
double**
double[]
double[][]
double[][]
Variable name(s)
det
K1, K2, ...
coords
w
W
X, Y, X1, ...
A
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
A:5
LISTING 1: Local assembly code generated by Firedrake for a Helmholtz problem on a 2D
triangular mesh using Lagrange p = 1 elements.
void helmholtz(double A[3][3], double **coords) {
// K, det = Compute Jacobian (coords)
static const double W[3] = {...}
static const double X D10[3][3] = {{...}}
static const double X D01[3][3] = {{...}}
for (int i = 0; i<3; i++)
for (int j = 0; j<3; j++)
for (int k = 0; k<3; k++)
A[j][k] += ((Y[i][k]*Y[i][j]+
+((K1*X D10[i][k]+K3*X D01[i][k])*(K1*X D10[i][j]+K3*X D01[i][j]))+
+((K0*X D10[i][k]+K2*X D01[i][k])*(K0*X D10[i][j]+K2*X D01[i][j])))*
*det*W[i]);
}
LISTING 2: Local assembly code generated by Firedrake for a Burgers problem on a 3D tetrahedral mesh using Lagrange p = 1 elements.
void burgers(double A[12][12], double **coords, double **w) {
// K, det = Compute Jacobian (coords)
static const double W[5] = {...}
static const double X1 D001[5][12] = {{...}}
static const double X2 D001[5][12] = {{...}}
//11 other basis functions definitions.
...
for (int i = 0; i<5; i++) {
double F0 = 0.0;
//10 other declarations (F1, F2,...)
...
for (int r = 0; r<12; r++) {
F0 += (w[r][0]*X1 D100[i][r]);
//10 analogous statements (F1, F2, ...)
...
}
for (int j = 0; j<12; j++)
for (int k = 0; k<12; k++)
A[j][k] += (..(K5*F9)+(K8*F10))*Y1[i][j])+
+(((K0*X1 D100[i][k])+(K3*X1 D010[i][k])+(K6*X1 D001[i][k]))*Y2[i][j]))*F11)+
+(..((K2*X2 D100[i][k])+...+(K8*X2 D001[i][k]))*((K2*X2 D100[i][j])+...+(K8*X2 D001[i][j]))..)+
+ <roughly a hundred sum/muls go here>)..)*
*det*W[i]);
}
}
The actual complexity of a local assembly kernel depends on the finite element problem being solved. In simpler cases, the loop nest is perfect, has short trip counts (in the
range 3–15), and the computation reduces to a summation of a few products involving
basis functions. An example is provided in Listing 1, which shows the assembly kernel
for a Helmholtz problem using Lagrange basis functions on 2D elements with polynomial order p = 1. In other scenarios, for instance when solving the Burgers equation,
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:6
F. Luporini et al.
the number of arrays involved in the computation of the element matrix can be much
larger. The assembly code is given in Listing 2 and contains 14 unique arrays that
are accessed, where the same array can be referenced multiple times within the same
expression. This may also require the evaluation of constants in outer loops (called F
in the code) to act as scaling factors of arrays. Trip counts grow proportionally to the
order of the method and arrays may be block-sparse. In addition to a larger number
of operations, more complex cases like the Burgers equation are characterized by high
register pressure.
The Helmholtz and Burgers equations exemplify a large class of problems and, as
such, will constitute our benchmark problems, along with the Diffusion equation. We
carefully motivate this choice in Section 5.2.
Despite the infinite variety of assembly kernels which Firedrake can generate, it
is still possible to identify common domain-specific traits that can be exploited for
effective code transformations and SIMD vectorization. These include: 1) memory accesses along the three loop dimensions are always unit stride; 2) the j and k loops are
interchangeable, whereas interchanges involving the i loop require pre-computation
of values (e.g. the F values in Burgers) and introduction of temporary arrays, as explained in Section 3; 3) depending on the problem being solved, the j and k loops could
iterate over the same iteration space; 4) most of the sub-expressions on the right hand
side of the element matrix computation depend on just two loops (either i-j or i-k).
In Section 3 we show how to exploit these observations to define a set of systematic,
composable optimizations.
3. CODE TRANSFORMATIONS
The code transformations presented in this section are applicable to all finite element
problems that can be formulated in Firedrake. As already emphasized, the structure
of mathematical expressions evaluating the element matrix and the variation in loop
trip counts, although typically limited to the order of tens of iterations, render the
optimization process challenging. It is not always the same set of optimizations that
bring performance closest to the machine peak. For example, the Burgers problem in
Listing 2, given the large number of arrays accessed, suffers from high register pressure, whereas the Helmholtz problem in Listing 1 does not; this intuitively suggests
that the two problems require a different treatment, based on an in-depth analysis of
both data and iteration spaces. Furthermore, domain-knowledge enables transformations that a general-purpose compiler could not apply, making the optimization space
even larger. In this context, our goal is to understand the relationship between distinct
code transformations, their impact on local assembly kernels, and to what extent their
composability is effective in a class of problems and architectures.
3.1. Padding and Data Alignment
The absence of stencils renders the element matrix computation easily autovectorizable by a vendor compiler. Nevertheless, auto-vectorization is not efficient if
data are not aligned and if the length of the innermost loop is not a multiple of the
vector length VL, especially when the loops are small as in local assembly.
Data alignment is enforced in two steps. Firstly, all arrays are allocated to addresses
that are multiples of VL. Then, two dimensional arrays are padded by rounding the
number of columns to the nearest multiple of VL. For instance, assume the original
size of a basis function array is 3×3 and VL = 4 (e.g. AVX processor, with 256 bit long
vector registers and 64-bit double-precision floats). In this case, a padded version of
the array will have size 3×4. The compiler is explicitly informed about data alignment
using a suitable pragma.
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
A:7
Padding of all two dimensional arrays involved in the evaluation of the element matrix also allows to safely round the loop trip count to the nearest multiple of VL. This
avoids the introduction of a remainder (scalar) loop from the compiler, which would
render vectorization less efficient. These extra iterations only write to the padded region of the element matrix, and therefore have no side effects on the final result.
3.2. Generalized Loop-invariant Code Motion
From the inspection of the codes in Listings 1 and 2, it can be noticed that the computation of A involves evaluating many sub-expressions which only depend on two
iteration variables. Since symbols in most of these sub-expressions are read-only variables, there is ample space for loop-invariant code motion. Vendor compilers apply this
technique, although not in the systematic way we need for our assembly kernels. We
want to overcome two deficiencies that both Intel and GNU compilers exhibit. First,
they only identify sub-expressions that are invariant with respect to the innermost
loop. This is an issue for sub-expressions depending on i-k, which are not automatically lifted in the loop order ijk. Second, the hoisted code is scalar and therefore not
subjected to auto-vectorization.
We work around these limitations with source-level loop-invariant code motion. In
particular, we pre-compute all values that an invariant sub-expression assumes along
its fastest varying dimension. This is implemented by introducing a temporary array per invariant sub-expression and by adding a new loop to the nest. At the price
of extra memory for storing temporaries, the gain is that lifted terms can be autovectorized as part of an inner loop. Given the short trip counts of our loops, it is important to achieve auto-vectorization of hoisted terms in order to minimize the percentage
of scalar instructions, which could otherwise be significant. It is also worth noting that,
in some problems (e.g. Helmholtz), invariant sub-expressions along j are identical to
those along k, and both loops iterate over the same iteration space, as anticipated in
Section 2. In these cases, we safely avoid redundant pre-computation.
Listing 3 shows the Helmholtz assembly code after the application of loop-invariant
code motion, padding, and data alignment.
3.3. Model-driven Vector-register Tiling
One notable problem of assembly kernels concerns register allocation and register locality. The critical situation occurs when loop trip counts and the variables accessed
are such that the vector-register pressure is high. Since the kernel’s working set fits
the L1 cache, it is particularly important to optimize register management. Standard
optimizations, such as loop interchange, unroll, and unroll-and-jam, can be employed
to deal with this problem. In COFFEE, these optimizations are supported either by
means of explicit code transformations (interchange, unroll-and-jam) or indirectly by
delegation to the compiler through standard pragmas (unroll). Tiling at the level of
vector registers is an additional feature of COFFEE. Based on the observation that
the evaluation of the element matrix can be reduced to a summation of outer products along the j and k dimensions, a model-driven vector-register tiling strategy can
be implemented. If we consider the code snippet in Listing 3 and we ignore the presence of the operation det*W3[i], the computation of the element matrix is abstractly
expressible as
X
Ajk =
xj · yk
j, k = 0, ..., 2
(1)
x∈B 0 ⊆B
y∈B 00 ⊆B
where B is the set of all basis functions (or temporary variables, e.g., LI 0) accessed in
the kernel, whereas B 0 and B 00 are generic problem-dependent subsets. Regardless of
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:8
F. Luporini et al.
LISTING 3: Local assembly code for the Helmholtz problem in Listing 1 after application of
padding, data alignment, and licm, for an AVX architecture. In this example, sub-expressions
invariant to j are identical to those invariant to k, so they can be precomputed once in the r loop.
void helmholtz(double A[3][4], double **coords) {
#define ALIGN attribute ((aligned(32)))
// K, det = Compute Jacobian (coords)
static const double W[3] ALIGN = {...}
static const double X D10[3][4] ALIGN = {{...}}
static const double X D01[3][4] ALIGN = {{...}}
for (int i = 0; i<3; i++) {
double LI 0[4] ALIGN;
double LI 1[4] ALIGN;
for (int r = 0; r<4; r++) {
LI 0[r] = ((K1*X D10[i][r])+(K3*X D01[i][r]));
LI 1[r] = ((K0*X D10[i][r])+(K2*X D01[i][r]));
}
for (int j = 0; j<3; j++)
#pragma vector aligned
for (int k = 0; k<4; k++)
A[j][k] += (Y[i][k]*Y[i][j]+LI 0[k]*LI 0[j]+LI 1[k]*LI 1[j])*det*W[i]);
}
}
the specific input problem, by abstracting from the presence of all variables independent of both j and k, the element matrix computation is always reducible to this form.
Figure 2 illustrates how we can evaluate 16 entries (j, k = 0, ..., 3) of the element matrix using just 2 vector registers, which represent a 4×4 tile, assuming |B 0 | = |B 00 | = 1.
Values in a register are shuffled each time a product is performed. Standard compiler
auto-vectorization for both GNU and Intel compilers, instead, executes 4 broadcast
operations (i.e., “splat” of a value over all of the register locations) along the outer dimension to perform the calculation. In addition to incurring a larger number of cache
accesses, it needs to keep between f = 1 and f = 3 extra registers to perform the same
16 evaluations when unroll-and-jam is used, with f being the unroll-and-jam factor.
After the first permutation
Intial configuration
x
0
1
2
3
0
1
×
y
0
1
1,1
3
After the second permutation After the third permutation
0
1
2
3
1
0
3
2
2
3
=
2,2
3,3
0,1
1,0
2
3
0
1
×
×
=
A 0,0
2
0
1
3
2
3,2
0,2
1,3
3
1
0
2,1
3,0
=
=
2,3
2
×
2,0
3,1
0,3
1,2
Fig. 2: Outer-product vectorization by permuting values in a vector register.
The storage layout of A, however, is incorrect after the application of this outerproduct-based vectorization (op-vect, in the following). It can be efficiently restored
with a sequence of vector shuffles following the pattern highlighted in Figure 3, executed once outside of the ijk loop nest. The generated pseudo-code for the simple
Helmholtz problem when using op-vect is shown in Figure 4.
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
Initial configuration
After the first set of shuffles
A:9
After the second set of shuffles
Layout restored
(0, 0)
(1, 1)
(2, 2)
(3, 3)
(0, 0)
(1, 1)
(2, 2)
(3, 3)
(0, 0)
(0, 1)
(2, 2)
(2, 3)
(0, 0)
(0, 1)
(0, 2)
(0, 3)
(0, 1)
(1, 0)
(2, 3)
(3, 2)
(0, 1)
(1, 0)
(2, 3)
(3, 2)
(1, 0)
(1, 1)
(3, 2)
(3, 3)
(1, 0)
(1, 1)
(1, 2)
(1, 3)
(0, 2)
(1, 3)
(2, 0)
(3, 1)
(0, 2)
(1, 3)
(2, 0)
(3, 1)
(0, 2)
(0, 3)
(2, 0)
(2, 1)
(2, 0)
(2, 1)
(2, 2)
(2, 3)
(0, 3)
(1, 2)
(2, 1)
(3, 0)
(0, 3)
(1, 2)
(2, 1)
(3, 0)
(1, 2)
(1, 3)
(3, 0)
(3, 1)
(3, 0)
(3, 1)
(3, 2)
(3, 3)
Fig. 3: Restoring the storage layout after op-vect. The figure shows how 4×4 elements
in the top-left block of the element matrix A can be moved to their correct positions.
Each rotation, represented by a group of three same-colored arrows, is implemented
by a single shuffle intrinsic.
LISTING 4: Local assembly code generated by Firedrake for the Helmholtz problem after application of op-vect on top of the optimizations shown in Listing 3. In this example, the unrolland-jam factor is 1.
void helmholtz(double A[4][4], double **coords) {
// K, det = Compute Jacobian (coords)
// Declaration of basis function matrices
for (int i = 0; i<3; i++) {
// Do generalized loop-invariant code motion
for (int j = 0; j<4; j+=4)
for (int k = 0; k<4; k+=4) {
// load and set intrinsics
// Compute A[0,0], A[1,1], A[2,2], A[3,3]
// One permute pd intrinsic per k-loop load
// Compute A[0,1], A[1,0], A[2,3], A[3,2]
// One permute2f 128 pd intrinsic per k-loop load
// ...
}
// Remainder loop (from j = 4 to j = 6)
}
// Restore the storage layout:
for (int j = 0; j<4; j+=4) {
m256d r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7;
for (int k = 0; k<4; k+=4) {
r0 = mm256 load pd (&A[j+0][k]);
// Load A[j+1][k], A[j+2][k], A[j+3][k]
r4 = mm256 unpackhi pd (r1, r0);
r5 = mm256 unpacklo pd (r0, r1);
r6 = mm256 unpackhi pd (r2, r3);
r7 = mm256 unpacklo pd (r3, r2);
r0 = mm256 permute2f128 pd (r5, r7, 32);
r1 = mm256 permute2f128 pd (r4, r6, 32);
r2 = mm256 permute2f128 pd (r7, r5, 49);
r3 = mm256 permute2f128 pd (r6, r4, 49);
mm256 store pd (&A[j+0][k], r0);
// Store A[j+1][k], A[j+2][k], A[j+3][k]
}
}
}
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:10
F. Luporini et al.
3.4. Expression Splitting
LISTING 5: Local assembly code generated by Firedrake for the Helmholtz problem in which
split has been applied on top of the optimizations shown in Listing 3. In this example, the split
factor is 2.
void helmholtz(double A[3][4], double **coords) {
// Same code as in Listing 3 up to the j loop
for (int j = 0; j<3; j++)
#pragma vector aligned
for (int k = 0; k<4; k++)
A[j][k] += (Y[i][k]*Y[i][j]+LI 0[k]*LI 0[j])*det*W3[i];
for (int j = 0; j<3; j++)
#pragma vector aligned
for (int k = 0; k<4; k++)
A[j][k] += LI 1[k]*LI 1[j]*det*W3[i];
}
In complex kernels, like Burgers in Listing 2, and on certain architectures, achieving
effective register allocation can be challenging. If the number of variables independent
of the innermost-loop dimension is close to or greater than the number of available
CPU registers, poor register reuse is likely. This usually happens when the number of
basis function arrays, temporaries introduced by generalized loop-invariant code motion, and problem constants is large. For example, applying loop-invariant code motion
to Burgers on a 3D mesh requires 24 temporaries for the ijk loop order. This can make
hoisting of the invariant loads out of the k loop inefficient on architectures with a relatively low number of registers. One potential solution to this problem consists of suitably “splitting” the computation of the element matrix A into multiple sub-expressions;
an example, for the Helmholtz problem, is given in Listing 5. The transformation can
be regarded as a special case of classic loop fission, in which associativity of the sum is
exploited to distribute the expression across multiple loops. To the best of our knowledge, expression splitting is not supported by available compilers.
Splitting an expression has, however, several drawbacks. Firstly, it increases the
number of accesses to A proportionally to the “split factor”, which is the number of
sub-expressions produced. Also, depending on how the split is executed, it can lead
to redundant computation. For example, the number of times the product det ∗ W 3[i]
is performed is proportional to the number of sub-expressions, as shown in the code
snippet. Further, it increases loop overhead, for example through additional branch
instructions. Finally, it might affect register locality: for instance, the same array could
be accessed in different sub-expressions, requiring a proportional number of loads be
performed. This is not the case for the Helmholtz example. Nevertheless, as shown in
Section 5, the performance gain from improved register reuse along inner dimensions
can still be greater, especially if the split factor and the splitting itself use heuristics
to minimize the aforementioned issues.
Table II summarizes the code transformations described so far. Given that many of
these transformations depend on some parameters (e.g. tile size), we need a mechanism to prune such a large optimization space. This aspect is treated in Section 4.
4. OVERVIEW OF COFFEE
Firedrake users employ the Unified Form Language to express problems in a notation
resembling mathematical equations. At run-time, the high-level specification is translated by a modified version of the FEniCS Form Compiler (FFC) [Kirby and Logg 2006]
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
A:11
Table II: Overview of code transformations for Firedrake-generated assembly kernels.
Name (Abbreviation)
Generalized loop-invariant code motion (licm)
Padding
Data Alignment
Loop interchange
Loop unrolling
Outer-product vectorization (op-vect)
Expression splitting (split)
Parameter
loops
unroll factor
tile size
split point, split factor
into an abstract syntax tree (AST) representation of one or more finite element assembly kernels. ASTs are then passed to COFFEE to apply the transformations described
in Section 3. The output of COFFEE, C code, is eventually provided to PyOP2 [Rathgeber et al. 2012; Markall et al. 2013], where just-in-time compilation and execution over
the discretized domain take place. The flow is summarized in Figure 4.
Because of the large number of parametric transformations, COFFEE needs a mechanism to select the most suitable optimization strategy for a given problem. Autotuning might be used, although it would significantly increase the run-time overhead,
since the generation of ASTs occurs at run-time as soon as problem-specific data are
available. Our optimization strategy, based on heuristics and a simple cost model, is
described in the following, along with an overview of the compiler.
The compiler structure is outlined in Figure 5. Initially the AST is inspected, looking for the presence of iteration spaces and domain-specific information provided by
the higher layer. If the kernel lacks an iteration space, then so-called inter-kernel vectorization, in which the outer, non-affine loop over mesh elements is vectorized, can be
applied. This feature, currently under development, has been shown to be useful in several finite volume applications [Reguly et al. 2007]. Subsequently, an ordered sequence
of optimization steps are executed. Application of licm must precede padding and data
alignment, due to the introduction of temporary arrays. Based on a cost model, loop
interchange, split, and op-vect may be introduced. Their implementation is based on
analysis and transformation of the kernel’s AST. When op-vect is selected, the compiler
outputs AVX or AVX-512 intrinsics code. Any possible corner cases are handled: for example, if op-vect is to be applied, but the size of the iteration space is not a multiple of
the vector length, then a remainder loop, amenable to auto-vectorization, is inserted.
All loops are interchangeable, provided that temporaries are introduced if the nest
is not perfect. For the employed storage layout, the loop permutations ijk and ikj are
UFL
UFL
code
FFC
Kernel
AST
COFFEE
Kernel
C code
PyOP2
Run-time compilation
Execution over the mesh
Handle parallelism
Unstructured mesh used to
discretized the domain of the PDE.
A local assembly kernel is
executed in all cells
Fig. 4: High-level view of Firedrake. COFFEE is at the core, receiving ASTs from a
modified version of the FEniCS Form compiler and producing optimized C code kernels.
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:12
F. Luporini et al.
Input:
ast: abstract syntax tree of a local assembly kernel produced by FFC
wrapper: the function within which the kernel is invoked
isa: represents the SIMD Instruction Set Architecture
Output: assembly code (C string)
// Analyze ast and build optimization plan
it space = analyze(ast)
if not it space
ast.apply inter kernel vectorization(wrapper, isa)
return wrapper + ast.from ast to c()
plan = cost model(it space.n inner arrays, isa.n regs)
// Optimize ast based on plan
ast.licm()
ast.padding()
ast.align data()
if plan.permute
ast.permute assembly loops()
if plan.split factor
ast.split(plan.split factor)
if plan.uaj factor
uaj = MIN(plan.uaj factor, it space.j.size/isa.vf)
ast.op vect(uaj)
return wrapper + ast.from ast to c()
Fig. 5: Outline of the COFFEE architecture.
likely to maximize performance. Conceptually, this is motivated by the fact that if the i
loop were in an inner position, then a significantly higher number of load instructions
would be required at every iteration. We tested this hypothesis in manually crafted
kernels. We found that the performance loss is greater than the gain due to the possibility of accumulating increments in a register, rather than memory, along the i loop.
The choice between ijk and ikj depends on the number of load instructions that can
be hoisted out of the innermost dimension. Our compiler chooses as outermost the loop
along which the number of invariant loads is smaller so that more registers remain
available to carry out the computation of the element matrix.
Loop unroll (or unroll-and-jam of outer loops) is fundamental to the exposure of
instruction-level parallelism, and tuning the unroll factor is particularly important.
However, we noticed, by comparison with implementations having manually-unrolled
loops, that recent versions of the Intel compiler estimate close-to-optimal unroll factors when the loops are affine and their bounds are small and known at compile-time,
which is the case of our kernels. We therefore leave the backend compiler in charge
of selecting unroll factors. This choice also simplifies COFFEE’s cost model. The only
situation in which we explicitly unroll-and-jam a loop is when op-vect is used, since the
transformed code prevents the Intel compiler from applying this optimization, even if
specific pragmas are added.
The cost model is shown in Figure 6. It takes into account the number of available logical vector registers, n regs, and the number of unique variables accessed:
n consts counts variables independent of both j and k loops and temporary registers,
n outer arrays counts j-dependent variables, and n inner arrays counts k-dependent
variables, assuming the ijk loop order. These values are used to estimate unroll-andjam and split factors for op-vect and split. If a factor is 0, then the corresponding transformation is not applied. The split transformation is triggered whenever the number
of hoistable terms is larger than the available registers along the outer dimension
(lines 3-8), which is approximated as half of the total (line 3). A split factor of n means
that the assembly expression should be “cut” into n sub-expressions. Depending on
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
A:13
Input: n outer arrays, n inner arrays, n consts, n regs
Output: uaj factor, split factor
n outer regs = n regs / 2
split factor = 0
// Compute spltting factor
while n outer arrays > n outer regs
n outer arrays = n outer arrays / 2
split factor = split factor + 1
// Compute unroll-and-jam factor for op-vect
n regs avail = n regs - (n outer arrays + n consts)
uaj factor = n reg avail / n inner arrays
// Estimate the benefit of permuting loops
permute = n outer arrays > n inner arrays
return <permute, split factor, uaj factor>
Fig. 6: The cost model is employed by the compiler to estimate the most suitable unrolland-jam (when op-vect is used) and split factors, avoiding the overhead of auto-tuning.
the structure of the assembly expression, each sub-expression might end up accessing a different number of arrays; the cost model is simplified by assuming that all
sub-expressions are of the same size. The unroll-and-jam factor for the op-vect transformation is determined as a function of the available logical registers, i.e., those not
used for storing hoisted terms (line 9-11). Finally, the profitability of loop interchange
is evaluated (line 13).
5. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
5.1. Experimental Setup
Experiments were run on a single core of two Intel architectures, a Sandy Bridge (I72600 CPU, running at 3.4GHz, 32KB L1 cache and 256KB L2 cache) and a Xeon Phi
(5110P, running at 1.05Ghz in native mode, 32KB L1 cache and 512KB L2 cache). We
have chosen these two architectures because of the differences in the number of logical registers and SIMD lanes, which can impact the effectiveness of the optimization
strategy. The icc 13.1 compiler was used. On the Sandy Bridge, the compilation flags
used were -O2 and -xAVX for auto-vectorization. On the Xeon Phi, optimization level
-O3 was used. Other optimization levels performed, in general, slightly worse.
5.2. The Helmholtz, Diffusion, and Burgers equations
Our code transformations were evaluated in three real-world problems based on the
following PDEs
(1) Helmholtz
(2) Advection-Diffusion
(3) Burgers
The three chosen benchmarks are real-life kernels and comprise the core differential
operators in some of the most frequently encountered finite element problems in scientific computing. The Helmholtz and Diffusion kernels are archetypal second order
elliptic operators. They are complete and unsimplified examples of the operators occurring for diffusion and viscosity in fluids, and for imposing pressure in compressible
fluids. As such, they are both extensively used in climate and ocean modeling. Very
similar operators, for which the same optimisations are expected to be equally effective, apply to elasticity problems, which are at the base of computational structural
mechanics. The Burgers kernel is a typical example of a first order hyperbolic conservation law, which occurs in real applications whenever a quantity is transported by a
fluid (the momentum itself, in our case). We chose this particular kernel since it apACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:14
F. Luporini et al.
Table III: Performance improvement due to generalized loop-invariant code motion,
for different element shapes (triangle, tetrahedron, prism) and polynomial orders (p ∈
[1, 4]), over the original non-optimized code, for the Helmholtz, Diffusion and Burgers
problems.
Sandy Bridge
p2
p3
1.46
1.68
2.10
2.64
2.28
2.45
problem
Helmholtz
Helmholtz
Helmholtz
shape
triangle
tetrahedron
prism
p1
1.05
1.36
2.16
Diffusion
Diffusion
Diffusion
triangle
tetrahedron
prism
1.09
1.30
2.15
1.68
2.20
1.82
Burgers
Burgers
Burgers
triangle
tetrahedron
prism
1.53
1.61
2.11
1.81
2.24
2.20
p4
1.67
2.27
2.06
p1
1,49
1,28
1,04
Xeon
p2
1,06
1,29
2,26
Phi
p3
1,05
2,05
1,93
p4
1,17
1,73
1,64
1.97
3.12
2.71
1.64
2.60
2.32
1,07
1,00
1,11
1,06
1,38
2,16
1,18
2,02
1,85
1,16
1,74
2,83
2.68
1.69
1.66
2.46
1.59
1.32
1,21
1,01
1,39
1,42
2,55
1,56
2,34
0,98
1,18
2,97
1,21
1,04
plies to a vector-valued quantity, while the elliptic operators apply to scalar quantities;
this impacts the generated code, as explained next. In this way, the operators we have
selected are characteristic of both the second and first order operators that dominate
in fluids and solids simulations, and a wide variety on local assembly codes can be
tested.
The benchmarks were written in UFL (code available at [Luporini 2014]) and executed over real unstructured meshes through Firedrake. The Helmholtz code has already been shown in Listing 1. For Advection-Diffusion, the Diffusion equation, which
uses the same differential operators as Helmholtz, is considered. In the Diffusion kernel code, the main differences with respect to Helmholtz are the absence of the Y
array and the presence of a few more constants for computing the element matrix.
Burgers is a non-linear problem employing differential operators different from those
of Helmholtz and relying on vector-valued quantities, which has a major impact on
the generated assembly code (see Listing 2), where a larger number of basis function
arrays (X1, X2, ...) and constants (F 0, F 1, ..., K0, K1, ...) are generated.
These problems were studied varying both the shape of mesh elements and the polynomial order p of the method, whereas the element family, Lagrange, is fixed. As might
be expected, the larger the element shape and p, the larger the iteration space. Triangles, tetrahedron, and prisms were tested as element shape. For instance, in the case
of Helmholtz with p = 1, the size of the j and k loops for the three element shapes is,
respectively, 3, 4, and 6. Moving to bigger shapes has the effect of increasing the number of basis function arrays, since, intuitively, the behavior of the equation has now
to be approximated also along a third axis. On the other hand, the polynomial order
affects only the problem size (the three loops i, j, and k, and, as a consequence, the
size of X and Y arrays). A range of polynomial orders from p = 1 to p = 4 were tested;
higher polynomial orders are excluded from the study because of current Firedrake
limitations. In all these cases, the size of the element matrix rarely exceeds 30×30,
with a peak of 105×105 in Burgers with prisms and p = 4.
5.3. Loop permutation
In the following, only results for the loop order ijk are shown. For the considerations
exposed in Section 4, loop interchanges having an inner loop along i caused slow
downs; also, interchanging j and k loops while keeping i as outermost loop did not
provide any benefits.
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
A:15
Table IV: Performance improvement due to generalized loop-invariant code motion,
data alignment, and padding, for different element shapes (triangle, tetrahedron,
prism) and polynomial orders (p ∈ [1, 4]), over the original non-optimized code, for
the Helmholtz, Diffusion and Burgers problems.
Sandy Bridge
p2
p3
problem
shape
p1
Helmholtz
Helmholtz
Helmholtz
triangle
tetrahedron
prism
1.32
1.35
2.63
1.88
3.32
2.74
Diffusion
Diffusion
Diffusion
triangle
tetrahedron
prism
1.38
1.41
2.55
Burgers
Burgers
Burgers
triangle
tetrahedron
prism
1.56
1.61
2.19
Xeon Phi
p2
p3
p4
p1
2.87
2.66
2.43
4.13
3.27
2.75
1,50
1,41
2,38
2,41
1,50
2,47
1,30
2,79
2,15
1,96
2,81
1,71
p4
1.99
3.70
3.13
3.07
3.18
2.73
4.28
3.82
2.69
1,08
1,05
2,41
1,88
1,51
2,52
1,20
2,76
2,05
1,97
3,00
2,48
2.28
2.10
2.32
2.61
1.60
1.64
2.77
1.78
1.42
2,84
1,48
2,18
2,26
3,83
2,82
3,96
1,55
1,24
4,27
1,29
1,25
5.4. Impact of Generalized Loop-invariant Code Motion
Table III illustrates the performance improvement obtained when licm is applied. In
general, the speed ups are notable. The main reasons were anticipated in Section 3.2:
in the original code, 1) sub-expressions invariant to outer loops are not automatically
hoisted, while 2) sub-expressions invariant to the innermost loop are hoisted, but their
execution is not auto-vectorized. These observations come from inspection of assembly
code generated by the compiler.
The gain tends to grow with the computational cost of the kernels: bigger loop nests
(i.e., larger element shapes and polynomial orders) usually benefit from the reduction
in redundant computation, even though extra memory for the temporary arrays is
required. Some discrepancies to this trend are due to a less effective auto-vectorization.
For instance, on the Sandy Bridge, the improvement at p = 3 is larger than that at
p = 4 because, in the latter case, the size of the innermost loop is not a multiple of the
vector length, and a reminder scalar loop is introduced at compile time. Since the loop
nest is small, the cost of executing the extra scalar iterations can have a significant
impact. The reminder loop overhead is more pronounced on the Xeon Phi, where the
vector length is twice as big, which leads to proportionally larger scalar reminder loops.
5.5. Impact of Padding and Data Alignment
Table IV shows the cumulative impact of licm, data alignment, and padding over
the original code. In the following, this version of the code is referred to as licm-ap.
Padding, which avoids the introduction of a reminder loop as described in Section 5.4,
as well as data alignment, enhance the quality of auto-vectorization. Occasionally the
run-time of licm-ap is close to that of licm, since the non-padded element matrix size
is already a multiple of the vector length. Rarely licm-ap is slower than licm (e.g. in
Burgers p = 3 on the Sandy Bridge). One possible explanation is that the number of
aligned temporaries introduced by licm is so large to induce cache associativity conflicts.
5.6. Impact of Vector-register Tiling
In this section, we evaluate the impact of vector-register tiling. We compare two versions: the baseline, licm-ap; and vector-register tiling on top of licm-ap, which in the
following is referred to simply as op-vect.
Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the speed up achieved by op-vect over licm-ap in the Helmoltz and Diffusion kernels, respectively. As explained in Section 4, the op-vect version
requires the unroll-and-jam factor to be explicitly set. To distinguish between the two
ways this parameter was determined, for each problem instance (equation, element
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:16
F. Luporini et al.
shape, polynomial order) we report two bars: one shows the best speed-up obtained
after all feasible unroll-and-jam factors were tried; the other shows the speed up when
the unroll-and-jam factor was retrieved via the cost model. In a plot legend, cost model
bars are suffixed with “CM”.
It is worth noticing that, in most cases, the cost model successfully determines how
to transform a kernel to maximize its performance. This is chiefly because assembly
kernels fit the L1 cache, so, within a certain degree of confidence, it is possible to predict how to obtain a fast implementation by simply reasoning on the register pressure.
For each problem, the cost model stated to use the default loop permutation, to apply
a particular unroll-and-jam factor, and not to perform expression splitting, which, as
explained in Section 5.7, only deteriorates performance in Helmholtz and Diffusion.
The rationale behind these results is that the effect of op-vect is significant in problems in which the assembly loop nest is relatively big. When the loops are short, since
the number of arrays accessed at every loop iteration is rather small (between 4 and 8
temporaries, plus the element matrix itself), there is no need for vector-register tiling;
extensive unrolling is sufficient to improve register re-use and, therefore, to maximize the performance. However, as the iteration space becomes larger, op-vect leads
to improvements up to 1.4× on the Sandy Bridge (Diffusion, prismatic mesh, p = 4
- increasing the overall speed up from 2.69× to 3.87×), and up to 1.4× on the Xeon
Phi (Helmholtz, tetrahedral mesh, p = 3 - bringing the overall speed up from 1.71× to
2.42×).
Using the Intel Architecture Code Analyzer tool [Intel Corporation 2012] on the
Sandy Bridge, we confirmed that speed ups are a consequence of increased register
re-use. In Helmholtz p = 4, for example, the tool showed that when using op-vect the
number of clock cycles to execute one iteration of the j loop decreases by roughly 17%,
and that this is a result of the relieved pressure on both of the data (cache) ports
available in the core.
On the Sandy Bridge, we have also measured the performance of individual kernels
in terms of floating-point operations per second. The theoretical peak on a single core,
with the Intel Turbo Boost technology activated, is 30.4 GFlop/s. In the case of Diffusion using a prismatic mesh and p = 4, we achieved a maximum of 21.9 GFlop/s with
op-vect enabled, whereas 16.4 GFlop/s was obtained when only licm-ap is used. This
result is in line with the expectations: analysis of assembly code showed that, in the
jk loop nest, which in this problem represents the bulk of the computation, 73% of
instructions are actually floating-point operations.
Application of op-vect to the Burgers problem induces significant slow downs due to
the large number of temporary arrays that need to be tiled, which exceeds the available
logical registers on the underlying architecture. Expression splitting can be used in
combination with op-vect to alleviate this issue; this is discussed in the next section.
5.7. Impact of Expression Splitting
Expression splitting relieves the register pressure when the element matrix evaluation
needs to read from a large number of basis function arrays. As detailed in Section 3.4,
in the price to pay for this optimazion, there are an increased number of accesses to the
element matrix and, potentially, redundant computation. Similarly to the analysis of
vector-register tiling, we compare two versions: the baseline, licm-ap; and expression
splitting on top of licm-ap, which, for simplicity, in the following is referred to as split.
For the Helmholtz and Diffusion kernels, in which only between 4 and 8 temporaries
are read at every loop iteration, split tends to slow down the computation, because of
the aforementioned drawbacks. Slow downs up to 1.4× and up to 1.6× were observed,
respectively, on the Sandy Bridge and the Xeon Phi. Note that the cost model prevents
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
1.4
Triangles
Triangles-CM
Tetrahedrons
Tetrahedrons-CM
Prisms
Prisms-CM
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
p1
p2
p3
Impact of op-vect on the Helmoltz kernel (Xeon Phi)
Performance improvement over licm-ap
Performance improvement over licm-ap
Impact of op-vect on the Helmholtz kernel (Sandy Bridge)
1.6
A:17
p4
1.6
1.4
Triangles
Triangles-CM
Tetrahedrons
Tetrahedrons-CM
Prisms
Prisms-CM
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
p1
Polynomial Order
p2
p3
p4
Polynomial Order
(a) Sandy Bridge
(b) Xeon Phi
Fig. 7: Performance improvement over licm-ap obtained by op-vect in the Helmholtz
kernel. Bars suffixed with “CM” indicate that the cost model was used to transform
the kernel.
1.4
Triangles
Triangles-CM
Tetrahedrons
Tetrahedrons-CM
Prisms
Prism-CM
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
p1
p2
p3
Polynomial Order
(a) Sandy Bridge
Impact of op-vect on the Diffusion kernel (Xeon Phi)
Performance improvement over licm-ap
Performance improvement over licm-ap
Impact of op-vect on the Diffusion kernel (Sandy Bridge)
1.6
p4
1.6
1.4
Triangles
Triangles-CM
Tetrahedrons
Tetrahedrons-CM
Prisms
Prism-CM
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
p1
p2
p3
p4
Polynomial Order
(b) Xeon Phi
Fig. 8: Performance improvement over licm-ap obtained by op-vect in the Diffusion
kernel. Bars suffixed with “CM” indicate that the cost model was used to transform
the kernel.
the adoption of the transformation: the while statement in Figure 6 is indeed never
entered.
In the Burgers kernels, between 12 and 24 temporaries are accessed at every loop
iteration, so split plays a key role on the Sandy Bridge, where the number of available
logical registers is only 16. Figure 9 shows the performance improvement achieved by
split over licm-ap. In almost all cases, a split factor of 1, meaning that the original
expression was divided into two parts, ensured close-to-peak perforance. The transformation negligibly affected register locality, so speed ups up to 1.5× were observed.
For instance, on the Sandy Bridge, when p = 4 and a prismatic mesh is employed, the
overall performance improvement (i.e., the one over the original code) increases from
1.44× to 2.11×. On the Xeon Phi, the impact of split is only marginal, since register
spilling is limited by the presence of 32 logical vector units.
On the Sandy Bridge, the performance of the Burgers kernel on a prismatic mesh
was 20.0 GFlop/s from p = 1 to p = 3, while it was 21.3 GFlop/s in the case of p = 4.
These values are notably close to the peak performance of 30.4 GFlop/s. Disabling split
makes the performance drop to 17.0 GFlop/s for p = 1, 2, 18.2 GFlop/s for p = 3, and
14.3 GFlop/s for p = 4. These values are in line with the speedups shown in Figure 9.
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:18
F. Luporini et al.
The split transformation was also tried in combination with op-vect (split-op-vect), although the cost model prevents its adoption on both platforms. Despite improvements
up to 1.22×, split-op-vect never outperforms split. This is motivated by two factors: for
small split factors, such as 1 and 2, the data space to be tiled is still too big, and register spilling affects run-time; for higher ones, sub-expressions become so small that, as
explained in Section 5.6, extensive unrolling already allows to achieve a certain degree
of register re-use.
1.4
Triangles
Triangles-CM
Tetrahedrons
Tetrahedrons-CM
Prisms
Prisms-CM
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
p1
p2
p3
Polynomial Order
(a) Sandy Bridge
Impact of split on the Burgers kernel (Xeon Phi)
Performance improvement over licm-ap
Performance improvement over licm-ap
Impact of split on the Burgers kernel (Sandy Bridge)
1.6
p4
1.6
1.4
Triangles
Triangles-CM
Tetrahedrons
Tetrahedrons-CM
Prisms
Prisms-CM
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
p1
p2
p3
p4
Polynomial Order
(b) Xeon Phi
Fig. 9: Performance improvement over licm-ap obtained by split in the Burgers kernel.
Bars suffixed with “CM” indicate that the cost model was used to transform the kernel.
5.8. Comparison with FEniCS Form Compiler’s built-in Optimizations
We have modified the FEniCS Form Compiler (FFC) to return an abstract syntax tree
representation of a local assembly kernel, rather than plain C++ code, so as to enable code transformations in COFFEE. Besides Firedrake, FFC is used in the FEniCS project [Logg et al. 2012]. In FEniCS, FFC can apply its own model-driven optimizations to local assembly kernels [Olgaard and Wells 2010], which mainly consist of
loop-invariant code motion and elimination, at code generation time, of floating point
operations involving zero-valued entries in basis function arrays.
The FEniCS Form Compiler’s loop-invariant code motion is different from COFFEE’s. It is based on expansion of arithmetic operations, for example applying distributivity and associativity to products and sums at code generation time, to identify
terms that are invariant of the whole loop nest. Depending on the way expansion is
performed, operation count may not decrease significantly.
Elimination of zero-valued terms, which are the result of using vector-valued quantities in the finite element problem, has the effect of introducing indirection arrays
in the generated code. This kind of optimization is currently under development in
COFFEE, although it will differ from FEniCS’ by avoiding non-contiguous memory
accesses, which would otherwise affect vectorization, at the price of removing fewer
zero-valued contributions.
Table V summarizes the performance achieved by COFFEE over the fastest FEniCS
(FFC) implementation on the Sandy Bridge for the Burgers, Helmholtz and Diffusion
kernels. Burgers’ slow downs occur in presence of a small iteration space (triangular mesh, p ∈ [1, 2]; tetrahedral mesh, p ∈ [1, 2]; prismatic mesh, p = 1). The result
shown represents the worst slow down, which was obtained with a triangular mesh
and p = 1. This is a result of removing zero-valued entries in FEniCS’ basis function
arrays: some operations are avoided, but indirection arrays prevent auto-vectorization,
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
A:19
which significantly impacts performance as soon as the element matrix becomes bigger than 12×12. However, with the forthcoming zero-removal optimization in COFFEE, we expect to outperform FEniCS in all problems. In the cases of Helmholtz and
Diffusion, the minimum improvements are, respectively, 1.10× and 1.18× (2D mesh,
p = 1), which tend to increase with polynomial order and element shape up to the
values illustrated in the table.
Table V: Performance comparison between FEniCS and COFFEE on the Sandy Bridge.
Problem
Helmholtz
Diffusion
Burgers
Max slow down
2.24×
Max speed up
4.14×
4.28×
1.61×
5.9. Comparison with hand-made BLAS-based implementations
For the Helmholtz problem on a tetrahedral mesh, manual implementations based
on Intel MKL BLAS were tested on the Sandy Bridge. This particular kernel can be
easily reduced to a sequence of four matrix-matrix multiplies that can be computed via
calls to BLAS dgemm. In the case of p = 4, where the element matrix is of size 35×35,
the computation was almost twice slower than the case in which licm-ap was used,
with the slow down being even worse for smaller problem sizes. These experiments
suggest that the question regarding to what extent linear algebra libraries can improve
performance cannot be trivially answered. This is due to a combination of issues: the
potential loss in data locality, as exposed in Section 3.4, the actual effectiveness of these
libraries when the arrays are relatively small, and the problem inherent to assembly
kernels concerning extraction of matrix-matrix multiplies from static analysis of the
kernel’s code. A comprehensive study of these aspects will be addressed in further
work.
6. RELATED WORK
The finite element method is extensively used to approximate solutions of PDEs. Wellknown frameworks and applications include nek5000 [Paul F. Fischer and Kerkemeier
2008], the FEniCS project [Logg et al. 2012], Fluidity [AMCG 2010], and of course
Firedrake. Numerical integration is usually employed to implement the local assembly phase. The recent introduction of domain specific languages (DSLs) to decouple
the finite element specification from its underlying implementation facilitated, however, the development of novel approaches. Methods based on tensor contraction [Kirby
and Logg 2006] and symbolic manipulation [Russell and Kelly 2013] have been implemented. We have designed COFFEE to specifically target numerical integration because it has been demonstrated that it remains the optimal choice for a wide class of
problems [Olgaard and Wells 2010].
Optimization of local assembly using numerical integration for CPU platforms has
been addressed in FEniCS [Olgaard and Wells 2010]. The comparison between COFFEE and this work is presented in Section 5.8. In [Markall et al. 2010], and more
recently in [Knepley and Terrel 2013], the problem has been studied for GPU architectures. In [Kruel and Bana 2013], variants of the standard numerical integration
algorithm have been specialized and evaluated for the PowerXCell processor, but an
exhaustive study from the compiler viewpoint - like ours - is missing, and none of the
optimizations presented in Section 3 are mentioned. Among these efforts, to the best
of our knowledge, COFFEE is the first work targeting low-level optimizations through
a real compiler approach.
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:20
F. Luporini et al.
Our compiler-based optimization approach is made possible by the top-level DSL,
which enables automated code generation. DSLs have been proven successful in autogenerating optimized code for other domains: Spiral [Püschel et al. 2005] for digital
signal processing numerical algorithms, [Spampinato and Püschel 2014] for dense
linear algebra, or Pochoir [Tang et al. 2011] and SDSL [Henretty et al. 2013] for image processing and finite difference stencils. Similarly, PyOP2 is used by Firedrake
to express iteration over unstructured meshes in scientific codes. COFFEE improves
automated code generation in Firedrake.
Many code generators, like those based on the Polyhedral model [Bondhugula et al.
2008] and those driven by domain-knowledge [Stock et al. 2011], make use of cost
models. The alternative of using auto-tuning to select the best implementation for a
given problem on a certain platform has been adopted by nek5000 [Shin et al. 2010]
for small matrix-matrix multiplies, the ATLAS library [Whaley and Dongarra 1998],
and FFTW [Frigo et al. 2005] for fast fourier transforms. In both cases, pruning the
implementation space is fundamental to mitigate complexity and overhead. Likewise,
COFFEE uses a cost model and heuristics (Section 4) to steer the optimization process.
7. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we have presented the design, optimizations and systematic performance
evaluation of COFFEE, a compiler for finite element local assembly. In this context,
to the best of our knowledge, COFFEE is the first compiler capable of introducing
low-level optimizations to maximize instruction-level parallelism, register locality and
SIMD vectorization. Assembly kernels have particular characteristics. Their iteration
space is usually very small, with the size depending on aspects like the degree of accuracy one wants to reach (polynomial order of the method) and the mesh discretization
employed. The data space, in terms of number of arrays and scalars required to evaluate the element matrix, grows proportionally with the complexity of the finite element
problem. COFFEE has been developed taking into account all of these degrees of freedom, based on the idea that reducing the problem of local assembly optimization to
a fixed sequence of transformations is far too superficial if close-to-peak performance
needs to be reached. The various optimizations overcome limitations of current vendor
and research compilers. The exploitation of domain knowledge allows some of them to
be particularly effective, as demonstrated by our experiments on two state-of-the-art
Intel platforms. Further work includes a comprehensive study about feasibility and
constraints on transforming kernels into a sequence of calls to external linear algebra libraries. COFFEE supports all of the problems expressible in Firedrake, and is
already integrated with this framework.
REFERENCES
M. S. Alnæs, A. Logg, K. B. Ølgaard, M. E. Rognes, and G. N. Wells. 2014. Unified Form Language: A domainspecific language for weak formulations of partial differential equations. ACM Trans Math Software 40,
2, Article 9 (2014), 9:1–9:37 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2566630
AMCG. 2010. Fluidity Manual (version 4.0-release ed.). Applied Modelling and Computation Group, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London,
SW7 2AZ, UK. available at http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/7086.
Uday Bondhugula, Albert Hartono, J. Ramanujam, and P. Sadayappan. 2008. A Practical Automatic Polyhedral Parallelizer and Locality Optimizer. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on
Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 101–113.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1375581.1375595
Zachary DeVito, Niels Joubert, Francisco Palacios, Stephen Oakley, Montserrat Medina, Mike Barrientos,
Erich Elsen, Frank Ham, Alex Aiken, Karthik Duraisamy, Eric Darve, Juan Alonso, and Pat Hanrahan.
2011. Liszt: A Domain Specific Language for Building Portable Mesh-based PDE Solvers. In Proceedings
of 2011 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis
(SC ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 12 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2063384.2063396
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
COFFEE: an Optimizing Compiler for Finite Element Local Assembly
A:21
Firedrake contributors. 2014. The Firedrake Project. http://www.firedrakeproject.org. (2014).
Matteo Frigo, Steven, and G. Johnson. 2005. The design and implementation of FFTW3. In Proceedings of
the IEEE. 216–231.
Tom Henretty, Richard Veras, Franz Franchetti, Louis-Noël Pouchet, J. Ramanujam, and P. Sadayappan.
2013. A Stencil Compiler for Short-vector SIMD Architectures. In Proceedings of the 27th International
ACM Conference on International Conference on Supercomputing (ICS ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13–24. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2464996.2467268
Intel Corporation. 2012. Intel architecture code analyzer (IACA). [Online]. Available:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-architecture-code-analyzer/.
Robert C. Kirby, Matthew Knepley, Anders Logg, and L. Ridgway Scott. 2005. Optimizing the
Evaluation of Finite Element Matrices. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27, 3 (Oct. 2005), 741–758.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/040607824
Robert C. Kirby and Anders Logg. 2006. A Compiler for Variational Forms. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 32, 3
(Sept. 2006), 417–444. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1163641.1163644
Matthew G. Knepley and Andy R. Terrel. 2013. Finite Element Integration on GPUs. ACM Trans. Math.
Softw. 39, 2, Article 10 (Feb. 2013), 13 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2427023.2427027
Filip Kruel and Krzysztof Bana. 2013. Vectorized OpenCL Implementation of Numerical Integration for Higher Order Finite Elements. Comput. Math. Appl. 66, 10 (Dec. 2013), 2030–2044.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2013.08.026
Anders Logg, Kent-Andre Mardal, Garth N. Wells, and others. 2012. Automated Solution of Differential
Equations by the Finite Element Method. Springer. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8
Fabio Luporini. 2014. Helmholtz, Advection-Diffusion, and Burgers UFL code. https://github.com/
firedrakeproject/firedrake/tree/pyop2-ir-perf-eval/tests/perf-eval. (2014).
Graham R. Markall, David A. Ham, and Paul H.J. Kelly. 2010. Towards generating optimised finite element
solvers for {GPUs} from high-level specifications. Procedia Computer Science 1, 1 (2010), 1815 – 1823.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.04.203 {ICCS} 2010.
G. R. Markall, F. Rathgeber, L. Mitchell, N. Loriant, C. Bertolli, D. A. Ham, and P. H. J. Kelly. 2013. Performance portable finite element assembly using PyOP2 and FEniCS. In Proceedings of the International
Supercomputing Conference (ISC) ’13 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 7905. In press.
Kristian B. Olgaard and Garth N. Wells. 2010. Optimizations for quadrature representations of finite element tensors through automated code generation. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 37, 1, Article 8 (Jan. 2010),
23 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1644001.1644009
James W. Lottes Paul F. Fischer and Stefan G. Kerkemeier. 2008. nek5000 Web page. (2008).
http://nek5000.mcs.anl.gov.
Markus Püschel, José M. F. Moura, Jeremy Johnson, David Padua, Manuela Veloso, Bryan Singer, Jianxin
Xiong, Franz Franchetti, Aca Gacic, Yevgen Voronenko, Kang Chen, Robert W. Johnson, and Nicholas
Rizzolo. 2005. SPIRAL: Code Generation for DSP Transforms. Proceedings of the IEEE, special issue on
“Program Generation, Optimization, and Adaptation” 93, 2 (2005), 232– 275.
Florian Rathgeber, Graham R. Markall, Lawrence Mitchell, Nicolas Loriant, David A. Ham, Carlo Bertolli,
and Paul H.J. Kelly. 2012. PyOP2: A High-Level Framework for Performance-Portable Simulations on
Unstructured Meshes. In High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SCC), 2012
SC Companion:. 1116–1123. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SC.Companion.2012.134
I. Z. Reguly, E. László, G. R. Mudalige, and M. B. Giles. 2007. Vectorizing Unstructured Mesh
Computations for Many-core Architectures. In Proceedings of Programming Models and Applications on Multicores and Manycores (PMAM’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 39, 12 pages.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2560683.2560686
Diego Rossinelli, Babak Hejazialhosseini, Panagiotis Hadjidoukas, Costas Bekas, Alessandro Curioni, Adam
Bertsch, Scott Futral, Steffen J. Schmidt, Nikolaus A. Adams, and Petros Koumoutsakos. 2013. 11
PFLOP/s Simulations of Cloud Cavitation Collapse. In Proceedings of the International Conference on
High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA,
Article 3, 13 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2503210.2504565
Francis P. Russell and Paul H. J. Kelly. 2013. Optimized Code Generation for Finite Element Local Assembly
Using Symbolic Manipulation. ACM Trans. Math. Software 39, 4 (2013).
Jaewook Shin, Mary W. Hall, Jacqueline Chame, Chun Chen, Paul F. Fischer, and Paul D. Hovland. 2010. Speeding Up Nek5000 with Autotuning and Specialization. In Proceedings of the 24th
ACM International Conference on Supercomputing (ICS ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 253–262.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1810085.1810120
Daniele G. Spampinato and Markus Püschel. 2014. A Basic Linear Algebra Compiler. In International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization (CGO).
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:22
F. Luporini et al.
Kevin Stock, Tom Henretty, Iyyappa Murugandi, P. Sadayappan, and Robert Harrison. 2011. Model-Driven
SIMD Code Generation for a Multi-resolution Tensor Kernel. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS ’11). IEEE Computer Society, Washington,
DC, USA, 1058–1067. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2011.101
Yuan Tang, Rezaul Alam Chowdhury, Bradley C. Kuszmaul, Chi-Keung Luk, and Charles E. Leiserson.
2011. The Pochoir Stencil Compiler. In Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual ACM Symposium
on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 117–128.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1989493.1989508
Peter E. J. Vos, Spencer J. Sherwin, and Robert M. Kirby. 2010. From H to P Efficiently: Implementing Finite
and Spectral/Hp Element Methods to Achieve Optimal Performance for Low- and High-order Discretisations. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 13 (July 2010), 5161–5181. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.03.031
R. Clint Whaley and Jack J. Dongarra. 1998. Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra Software. In Proceedings
of the 1998 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (Supercomputing ’98). IEEE Computer Society,
Washington, DC, USA, 1–27. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=509058.509096
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
| 5cs.CE
|
ON FUNCTION COMPOSITIONS THAT ARE POLYNOMIALS
arXiv:1601.01779v1 [math.AC] 8 Jan 2016
ERHARD AICHINGER
Abstract. For a polynomial map f : k n → k m (k a field), we investigate those
polynomials g ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ] that can be written as a composition g = h ◦ f ,
where h : k m → k is an arbitrary function. In the case that k is algebraically
closed of characteristic 0 and f is surjective, we will show that g = h◦f implies
that h is a polynomial.
1. Introduction
In the present note we investigate the situation that the value of a polynomial
depends only on the value of certain given polynomials. To be precise, let k be a
field, m, n ∈ N, and let g, f1, . . . , fm ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. We say that g is determined
by f = (f1 , . . . , fm ) if for all a, b ∈ k n with f1 (a) = f1 (b), . . . , fm (a) = fm (b),
we have g(a) = g(b). In other words, g is determined by f if and only if there is
a function h : k m → k such that
g(a) = h(f1 (a), . . . , fm (a)) for all a ∈ k n .
For given f1 , . . . , fm ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ], the set of all elements of k[t1 , . . . , tn ] that are
determined by (f1 , . . . , fm ) is a k-subalgebra of k[t1 , . . . , tn ]; we will denote this
k-subalgebra by khf1 , . . . , fm i or khf i. As an example, we see that t1 ∈ Rht1 3 i;
more generally, if (f1 , . . . , fm ) ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ]m induces an injective map from k n
to k m , we have khf i = k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. In the present note, we will describe khf i in
the case that k is algebraically closed and f induces a map from k n to k m that
is surjective, or, in a sense specified later, at least close to being surjective.
The first set that khf i is compared with is the k-subalgebra of k[t1 , . . . , tn ]
generated by {f1 , . . . , fm }, which we will denote by k[f1 , . . . , fm ] or k[f ]; in this
algebra, we find exactly those polynomials that can be written as p(f1 , . . . , fm )
with p ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ]. Clearly, k[f ] ⊆ khf i. The other inclusion need not hold
f2
in general: on any field k, let f1 = t1 , f2 = t1 t2 . Then f21 = t1 t22 is (f1 , f2 )determined, but t1 t22 6∈ k[f1 , f2 ].
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13B25 (12E05).
Key words and phrases. polynomial composition, polynomial maps.
Supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF):P24077.
1
2
ERHARD AICHINGER
The second set with which we will compare khf i is the set of all polynomials
that can be written as rational functions in f1 , . . . , fm . We denote the quotient
field of k[t1 , . . . , tn ] by k(t1 , . . . , tn ). For r1 , . . . , rm ∈ k(t1 , . . . , tn ), the subfield of
k(t1 , . . . , tn ) that is generated by k ∪ {r1 , . . . , rm } is denoted k(r1 , . . . , rm ). We
first observe that there are polynomials that can be written as rational functions
in f , but fail to be f -determined. As an example, we see that t2 ∈ k(t1 , t1 t2 ), but
since (0, 0 · 0) = (0, 0 · 1) and 0 6= 1, the polynomial t2 is not (t1 , t1 t2 )-determined.
As for the converse inclusion, we take a field k of positive characteristic χ. Then
t1 is (t1 χ )-determined, but t1 6∈ k(t1 χ ).
On the positive side, it is known that k[f1 , . . . , fm ] = khf1 , . . . , fm i holds in
the following cases (cf. [1, Theorem 3.1]):
• k is algebraically closed, m = n = 1, and the derivative f ′ of f is not the
zero polynomial, and, more generally,
• k is algebraically closed, m = n, and there are univariate polynomials
′
g1 , . . . , gm ∈ k[t] with g1′ 6= 0, . . . , gm
6= 0, f1 = g1 (t1 ), . . . , fm = gm (tm ).
Let us now briefly outline the results obtained in the present note: Let k be an
algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, and let f1 , . . . , fm ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ] be
algebraically independent over k. Then we have khf i ⊆ k(f ) (Theorem 3.3). The
equality k[f ] = khf i holds if and only if f induces a map from k n to k m that
is almost surjective (see Definition 2.1). This equality is stated in Theorem 3.4.
Similar results are given for the case of positive characteristic.
The last equality has a consequence on the functional decomposition of polynomials. If f induces a surjective mapping from k n to k m , (k algebraically closed
of characteristic 0), and if h : k m → k is an arbitrary function such that h ◦ f
is a polynomial function, then h is a polynomial function. In an algebraically
closed field of positive characteristic χ, we will conclude that h is a composition
of taking χ-th roots and a polynomial function (Corollary 4.2).
2. Preliminaries about polynomials
For the notions from algebraic geometry used in this note, we refer to [2];
deviating from their definitions, we call the set of solutions of a system of polynomial equations an algebraic set (instead of affine variety). For an algebraically
closed field k and A ⊆ k m , we let Im (A) (or simply I(A)) be the set of polynomials vanishing on every point in A, and for P ⊆ k[t1 , . . . , tm ], we let Vm (P )
(or simply V (P )) be the set of common zeroes of P in k m . The Zariski-closure
V (I(A)) of a set A ⊆ k m will be abbreviated by A. The dimension of an algebraic set A is the maximal d ∈ {0, . . . , m} such that there are i1 < i2 < · · · <
id ∈ {1, . . . , m} with I(A) ∩ k[xi1 , . . . , xid ] = {0}. We abbreviate the dimension
of A by dim(A) and set dim(∅) := −1. For f1 , . . . , fm , g ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ], and
ON FUNCTION COMPOSITIONS THAT ARE POLYNOMIALS
3
D := {(f1 (a), . . . , fm (a), g(a)) | a ∈ k n }, its Zariski-closure D is an irreducible
algebraic set, and its dimension is the maximal number of algebraically independent elements in {f1 , . . . , fm , g}. The Closure Theorem [2, p. 258] tells that there
exists an algebraic set W ⊆ k m+1 with dim(W ) < dim(D) such that D = D ∪ W .
If dim(D) = m, then there exists an irreducible polynomial p ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm+1 ]
such that D = V (p). We will denote this p by Irr(D); Irr(D) is then defined up
to a multiplication with a nonzero element from k. Above this, we recall that
a set is constructible if and only if it can be generated from algebraic sets by a
finite application of the set-theoretic operations of forming the union of two sets,
the intersection of two sets, and the complement of a set, and that the range of
a polynomial map from k n to k m and its complement are constructible. This is
of course a consequence of the Theorem of Chevalley-Tarski [4, Exercise II.3.19],
but since we are only concerned with the image of k n , it also follows from [2,
p.262, Corollary 2].
Definition 2.1. Let k be an algebraically closed field, m, n ∈ N, and let f =
(f1 , . . . , fm ) ∈ (k[t1 , . . . , tn ])m . By range(f ), we denote the image of the mapping
f̂ : k n → k m that is induced by f . We say that f is almost surjective on k if the
dimension of the Zariski-closure of k m \ range(f ) is at most m − 2.
Proposition 2.2. Let k be an algebraically closed field, and let (f1 , . . . , fm ) ∈
k[t1 , . . . , tn ]m be almost surjective on k. Then the sequence (f1 , . . . , fm ) is algebraically independent over k.
Proof: Seeking a contradiction, we suppose that there is u ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] with
u 6= 0 and u(f1 , . . . , fm ) = 0. Then range(f ) ⊆ V (u), hence dim(range(f )) ≤
m − 1. Since f is almost surjective, k m is then the union of two algebraic sets of
dimension ≤ m − 1, a contradiction.
We will use the following easy consequence of the description of constructible
sets:
Proposition 2.3. Let k be an algebraically closed field, and let B be a constructible subset of k m with dim(B) ≥ m−1. Then there exist algebraic sets W, X
such that W is irreducible, dim(W ) = m − 1, dim(X) ≤ m − 2, W \ X ⊆ B.
Since B is constructible, there are irreducible algebraic
sets V1 , . . . , Vp and
Sp
algebraic sets W1 , . . . , Wp with Wi ( Vi and B = i=1 (Vi \ Wi ) (cf. [2, p.
262]). We assume that the Vi ’s are ordered with nonincreasing dimension. If
dim(V1 ) = m, then k m \ W1 ⊆ B. Let U be an irreducible algebraic set of
dimension m − 1 with U 6⊆ W1 . Then U ∩ (k m \ W1 ) = U \ (W1 ∩ U). Since
W1 ∩ U 6= U, setting W := U, X := W1 ∩ U yields the required sets.
If dim(V1 ) = m − 1, then W := V1 and X := W1 are the required sets.
The case dim(V1 ) ≤ m − 2 cannot occur because then B ⊆ V1 ∪ . . . ∪ Vp has
dimension at most m − 2.
4
ERHARD AICHINGER
Let k be a field, and let p, q, f ∈ k[t] such that deg(f ) > 0. It is known that
p(f ) divides q(f ) if and only if p divides q [3, Lemma 2.1 and 2.2]. The following
Lemma yields a multivariate version of this result.
Lemma 2.4. Let k be an algebraically closed field, m, n ∈ N, and let f =
(f1 , . . . , fm ) ∈ (k[t1 , . . . , tn ])m . Then the following are equivalent:
(1) f is almost surjective on k.
(2) k(f1 , . . . , fm )∩k[t1 , . . . , tn ] = k[f1 , . . . , fm ] and (f1 , . . . , fm ) is algebraically
independent over k.
(3) For all p, q ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] with p(f1 , . . . , fm ) | q(f1 , . . . , fm ), we have
p | q.
Proof: (1)⇒(2): (This proof uses some ideas from the proof of Theorem 4.2.1 in
[5, p. 82].) Let g ∈ k(f1 , . . . , fm )∩k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. Then there are r, s ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ]
with gcd(r, s) = 1 and g = r(f1 , . . . , fm )/s(f1 , . . . , fm ), and thus
(2.1)
g(t1 , . . . , tn ) · s(f1 , . . . , fm ) = r(f1 , . . . , fm ).
Suppose s 6∈ k. Then V (s) has dimension m − 1. We have V (s) = (V (s) ∩
range(f )) ∪ (V (s) ∩ (k m \ range(f ))) ⊆ V (s) ∩ range(f ) ∪ V (s) ∩ (k m \ range(f )).
Since f is almost surjective, V (s) ∩ range(f ) is then of dimension m − 1. Hence
it contains an irreducible component of dimension m − 1, and thus there is an
irreducible p ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that V (p) ⊆ V (s) ∩ range(f ). Since then
V (p) ⊆ V (s), the Nullstellensatz yields n1 ∈ N with p | sn1 , and thus by the
irreducibility of p, p | s. Now we show that for all a ∈ V (s) ∩ range(f ), we have
r(a) = 0. To this end, let b ∈ k n with f (b) = a. Setting t := b in (2.1), we
obtain r(a) = 0. Thus V (s) ∩ range(f ) ⊆ V (r), and therefore V (s) ∩ range(f ) ⊆
V (r), which implies V (p) ⊆ V (r). By the Nullstellensatz, we have an n2 ∈ N
with p | r n2 and thus by the irreducibility of p, p | r. Now p | r and p | s,
contradicting gcd(r, s) = 1. Hence s ∈ k, and thus g ∈ k[f1 , . . . , fm ]. The
algebraic independence of (f1 , . . . , fm ) follows from Proposition 2.2.
(2)⇒(3): Let p, q ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that p(f1 , . . . , fm ) | q(f1 , . . . , fm ). If
p(f1 , . . . , fm ) = 0, then q(f1 , . . . , fm ) = 0, and thus by the algebraic independence
of (f1 , . . . , fm ), we have q = 0 and thus p | q. Now assume p(f1 , . . . , fm ) 6= 0. We
have a(t1 , . . . , tn ) ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ] such that
(2.2)
q(f1 , . . . , fm ) = a(t1 , . . . , tn ) · p(f1 , . . . , fm )
and thus a(t1 , . . . , tn ) ∈ k(f1 , . . . , fm ) ∩ k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. Thus there exists b ∈
k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that a(t1 , . . . , tn ) = b(f1 , . . . , fm ). Now (2.2) yields
q(f1 , . . . , fm ) = b(f1 , . . . , fm ) · p(f1 , . . . , fm ).
Using the algebraic independence of (f1 , . . . , fm ), we obtain q(x1 , . . . , xm ) =
b(x1 , . . . , xm ) · p(x1 , . . . , xm ), and thus p | q.
ON FUNCTION COMPOSITIONS THAT ARE POLYNOMIALS
5
(3)⇒(1) Seeking a contradiction, we suppose that f is not almost surjective.
Let B := k m \ range(f ). Then dim(B) ≥ m − 1. Since B is constructible,
Proposition 2.3 yields W, X with W irreducible, dim(W ) = m − 1, dim(X) ≤
m − 2, W \ X ⊆ B. Since W is irreducible of dimension m − 1, there is p ∈
k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that W = V (p). Since dim(W ) > dim(X), we have W 6⊆ X,
thus I(X) 6⊆ I(W ), and therefore there is q ∈ I(X) with q 6∈ I(W ). We have
W ⊆ B ∪ X, and thus W ∩ range(f ) ⊆ X. This implies that for all a ∈ k n
with p(f (a)) = 0, we have q(f (a)) = 0: in fact, if p(f (a)) = 0, then f (a) ∈
V (p)∩range(f ) = W ∩range(f ) ⊆ X. Hence q(f (a)) = 0. By the Nullstellensatz,
we obtain a ν ∈ N such that p(f1 , . . . , fm ) | q(f1 , . . . , fm )ν . Therefore, using (3),
we have p | q ν . This implies V (p) ⊆ V (q). Thus we have W ⊆ V (q) and
therefore q ∈ I(W ), contradicting the choice of q. Hence f is almost surjective,
proving (1).
3. f -determined polynomials
We will first show that often all f -determined polynomials are rational functions of f . Special care, however, is needed in the case of positive characteristic.
In an algebraically closed field of characteristic χ > 0, the unary polynomial t1
is (tχ1 )-determined, but t1 is neither a polynomial nor a rational function of tχ1 .
Definition 3.1. Let k be a field of characteristic χ > 0, let n ∈ N, and let P be
a subset of k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. We define the set radχ (P ) by
ν
radχ (P ) := {f ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ] | there is ν ∈ N0 such that f χ ∈ P }.
Lemma 3.2. Let k be an algebraically closed field, let m, n ∈ N, let f1 , . . . , fm be
algebraically independent polynomials in k[t1 , . . . , tn ], let g ∈ khf1 , . . . , fm i, and
let D := {(f1 (a), . . . , fm (a), g(a)) | a ∈ k n }. Then dim(D) = m.
Proof: By the closure theorem [2, p. 258], there is an algebraic set W such
that D = D ∪ W and dim(W ) < dim(D). Let π : k m+1 → k m , (y1 , . . . , ym+1 ) 7→
(y1 , . . . , ym ) be the projection of k m+1 onto the first m coordinates, and let π(W )
be the Zariski-closure of π(W ) in k m . We will now examine the projection of
D. Since (f1 , . . . , fm ) is algebraically independent, π(D) is Zariski-dense in k m ,
and hence dim(π(D)) = m. Since dim(V ) ≥ dim(π(V )) holds for every algebraic
set V , we then obtain dim(D) ≥ dim(π(D)) ≥ dim(π(D)) = m. Seeking a
contradiction, we suppose that dim(D) = m + 1.
In the case dim(π(W )) = m, we use [2, p. 193, Theorem 3], which tells π(W ) =
Vm (I(W ) ∩ k[x1 , . . . , xm ]), and we obtain that k m = Vm (I(W ) ∩ k[x1 , . . . , xm ]),
and therefore I(W ) ∩ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] = {0}. Hence, x1 + I(W ), . . . , xm + I(W )
are algebraically independent in k[x1 , . . . , xm+1 ]/I(W ). Since dim(W ) ≤ m, we
observe that the sequence (x1 + I(W ), . . . , xm+1 + I(W )) is algebraically dependent over k, and therefore, there is a polynomial q(x1 , . . . , xm+1 ) ∈ I(W ) with
6
ERHARD AICHINGER
degxm+1 (q) > 0. Let r be the leading coefficient of q with respect to xm+1 , and
let (y1 , . . . , ym ) ∈ k m be such that r(y1, . . . , ym ) 6= 0. Then there are only finitely
many z ∈ k with (y1 , . . . , ym, z) ∈ W . Since D = k m+1 , there are then infinitely many z ∈ k with (y1 , . . . , ym , z) ∈ D, a contradiction to the fact that g is
f -determined.
In the case dim(π(W )) ≤ m − 1, we take (y1 , . . . , ym ) ∈ k m \ π(W ). For
all z ∈ k, we have (y1 , . . . , ym , z) ∈ D and (y1 , . . . , ym , z) 6∈ W , and therefore
all (y1 , . . . , ym , z) are elements of D, a contradiction to the fact that g is f determined.
Hence, we have dim(D) = m.
Theorem 3.3. Let k be an algebraically closed field, let χ be its characteristic,
let m, n ∈ N, and let (f1 , . . . , fm ) be a sequence of polynomials in k[t1 , . . . , tn ] that
is algebraically independent over k. Then we have:
(1) If χ = 0, then khf1 , . . . , fm i ⊆ k(f1 , . . . , fm ) ∩ k[t1 , . . . , tn ].
(2) If χ > 0, then khf1 , . . . , fm i ⊆ radχ (k(f1 , . . . , fm ) ∩ k[t1 , . . . , tn ]).
Proof: Let g ∈ khf1 , . . . , fm i. We define
D := {(f1 (a), . . . , fm (a), g(a)) | a ∈ k n },
we let D be its Zariski-closure in k m+1 , and we let W be an algebraic set with
dim(W ) < dim(D) and D = D ∪ W . By Lemma 3.2, we have dim(D) = m.
Now, we distinguish cases according to the characteristic of k. Let us first suppose χ = 0. Let q := Irr(D) be an irreducible polynomial with D = V (q),
and let d := degxm+1 (q). Since f1 , . . . , fm are algebraically independent over
k, wePhave d ≥ 1. We will now prove d = 1. Suppose d > 1. We write
q = di=0 qi (x1 , . . . , xm ) xim+1 . We recall that for a field K, and f, g ∈ K[t] of
positive degree, the resultant rest (f, g) is 0 if and only if deg(gcdK[t] (f, g)) ≥ 1
∂
[2, p. 156, Proposition 8]. Let r := resxm+1 (q, ∂xm+1
q) be the resultant of q
and its derivative when seen as elements of the ring k(x1 , . . . , xm )[xm+1 ]. If
∂
q have a common divisor in k(x1 , . . . , xm )[xm+1 ] with
r = 0, then q and ∂xm+1
1 ≤ degxm+1 (q) ≤ d − 1 in k(x1 , . . . , xm )[xm+1 ]. Using a standard argument
involving Gauß’s Lemma, we find a divisor a of q in k[x1 , . . . , xm+1 ] such that
1 ≤ degxm+1 (a) ≤ d − 1. This contradicts the irreducibility of q. Hence r 6= 0.
Since dim(π(W )) ≤ m−1, r 6= 0, and qd 6= 0, we have V (r) ∪V (qd ) ∪π(W ) 6= k m .
Thus we can choose a ∈ k m such that r(a) 6= 0, qd (a) 6= 0, and a 6∈ π(W ). Let
q̃(t) := q(a, t). Since rest (q̃(t), q̃ ′ (t)) = r(a) 6= 0, q̃ has d different roots in
k, and thus q(a, x) = 0 has d distinct solutions for x, say b1 , . . . , bd . We will
now show {(a, bi ) | i ∈ {1, . . . , d}} ⊆ D. Let i ∈ {1, . . . , d}, and suppose that
(a, bi ) 6∈ D. Then (a, bi ) ∈ W , and thus a ∈ π(W ), a contradiction. Thus all
the elements (a, b1 ), . . . , (a, bd ) lie in D. Since d > 1, this implies that g is not
ON FUNCTION COMPOSITIONS THAT ARE POLYNOMIALS
7
(f1 , . . . , fm )-determined. Therefore we have d = 1. Since (f1 , . . . , fm ) is algebraically independent, the polynomial q witnesses that g is algebraic of degree 1
over k(f1 , . . . , fm ), and thus lies in k(f1 , . . . , fm ). This concludes the case χ = 0.
Now we assume χ > 0. It follows from Lemma 3.2 that for every h ∈
kht1 , . . . , tn i, the Zariski-closure of D(h) := {(f1 (a), . . . , fm (a), h(a)) | a ∈ k n }
is an irreducible variety of dimension m in k m+1 . This implies that there is an
irreducible polynomial Irr(D(h)) ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that D(h) = V (Irr(D(h))).
Furthermore, by the closure theorem [2], there is an algebraic set W (h) ⊆ k m
such that dim(W (h)) ≤ m − 1 and D(h) ∪ W (h) = D(h). We will now prove the
following statement by induction on degxm+1 (Irr(D(h))).
Every f -determined polynomial h ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ] is an element of
radχ (k(f1 , . . . , fm ) ∩ k[t1 , . . . , tn ]).
Let
d := degxm+1 (Irr(D(h))).
If d = 0, then f1 , . . . , fm are algebraically dependent, a contradiction. If d = 1,
then since f1 , . . . , fm are algebraically independent, h is algebraic of degree 1 over
k(f1 , . . . , fm ), and thus lies in k(f1 , . . . , fm ) ∩ k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. Let us now consider
the case d > 1. We set
∂
Irr(D(h))).
e := degxm+1 ( ∂xm+1
If
∂
Irr(D(h))
∂xm+1
= 0, then there is a polynomial p ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm+1 ] such that
Irr(D(h)) = p(x1 , . . . , xm , xχm+1 ). We know that hχ is f -determined, hence by
Lemma 3.2, D(hχ ) is of dimension m. Since
p (f1 , . . . , fm , hχ ) = Irr(D(h)) (f1 , . . . , fm , h) = 0,
we have p ∈ I(D(hχ )). Thus D(hχ ) ⊆ V (p). Therefore, the irreducible polynomial Irr(D(hχ )) divides p, and thus
degxm+1 (Irr(D(hχ ))) ≤ degxm+1 (p) < degxm+1 (Irr(D(h))).
By the induction hypothesis, we obtain that hχ is an element of
radχ (k(f1 , . . . , fm )∩k[t1 , . . . , tn ]). Therefore, h ∈ radχ (k(f1 , . . . , fm )∩k[t1 , . . . , tn ]).
∂
This concludes the case that ∂xm+1
(Irr(D(h))) = 0.
If e = 0, we choose a = (a1 , . . . , am ) ∈ k m such that
∂
Irr(D(h)) (a1 , . . . , am , 0) 6= 0,
∂xm+1
such that the leading coefficient of Irr(D(h)) with respect to xm+1 does not vanish
at a, and such that a 6∈ π(W (h)). Then Irr(D(h))(a, x) = 0 has d different
solutions for x, say b1 , . . . , bd . Since {(a, bi ) | i ∈ {1, . . . , d}}∩W (h) = ∅ because
8
ERHARD AICHINGER
a 6∈ π(W (h)), we have {(a, bi ) | i ∈ {1, . . . , d}} ⊆ D(h). Since h is f -determined,
d = 1, contradicting the case assumption.
(d,e)
∂
If e > 0, then we compute the resultant r := resxm+1 (Irr(D(h)), ∂xm+1
Irr(D(h))),
seen as polynomials of degrees d and e over the field k(x1 , . . . , xm ) in the variable
xm+1 . As in the case χ = 0, the irreducibility of Irr(D(h)) yields r 6= 0. Now
we let a ∈ k m be such that r(a) 6= 0, the leading coefficient (Irr(D(h)))d of
Irr(D(h)) with respect to xm+1 does not vanish at a, and a 6∈ π(W (h)). Setting
(d,e)
q̃(t) := Irr(D(h)) (a, t), we see that rest (q̃(t), q̃ ′ (t)) 6= 0. Thus q̃ has d distinct
zeroes b1 , . . . , bd , and then {(a, bi ) | i ∈ {1, . . . , d}} ⊆ D(h). Since d > 1, this
contradicts the fact that h is f -determined.
Theorem 3.4. Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, let m, n ∈
N, and let f = (f1 , . . . , fm ) be a sequence of algebraically independent polynomials
in k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. Then the following are equivalent:
(1) khf1 , . . . , fm i = k[f1 , . . . , fm ].
(2) f is almost surjective.
Proof: (1)⇒(2): Suppose that f is not almost surjective. Then by Lemma 2.4,
there are p, q ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that p(f1 , . . . , fm ) | q(f1 , . . . , fm ) and p ∤ q.
Let d := gcd(p, q), p1 := p/d, q1 := q/d. Let a(t1 , . . . , tn ) ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ] be such
that
(3.1)
p1 (f1 , . . . , fm ) · a(t1 , . . . , tn ) = q1 (f1 , . . . , fm ).
We claim that b(t1 , . . . , tn ) := q1 (f1 , . . . , fm ) · a(t1 , . . . , tm ) is f -determined and
is not an element of k[f1 , . . . , fm ]. In order to show that b is f -determined,
we let c, d ∈ k n such that f (c) = f (d ). If p1 (f (c)) 6= 0, we have b(c) =
(c))
(d ))
q1 (f (c)) · a(c) = q1 (f (c)) · pq11(f
= q1 (f (d )) · pq11(f
= q1 (f (d )) · a(d ) = b(d ).
(f (c))
(f (d ))
If p1 (f (c)) = 0, we have b(c) = q1 (f (c)) · a(c). By (3.1), we have q1 (f (c)) = 0,
and thus b(c) = 0. Similarly b(d ) = 0. This concludes the proof that b is
f -determined.
Let us now show that b 6∈ k[f1 , . . . , fm ]. We have
b(t1 , . . . , tn ) =
q1 (f1 , . . . , fm )2
.
p1 (f1 , . . . , fm )
If b ∈ k[f1 , . . . , fm ], there is r ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] with r(f1 , . . . , fm ) = b(t1 , . . . , tn ).
Then r(f1 , . . . , fm )·p1 (f1 , . . . , fm ) = q1 (f1 , . . . , fm )2 . From the algebraic independence of (f1 , . . . , fm ), we obtain r(x1 , . . . , xm ) · p1 (x1 , . . . , xm ) = q1 (x1 , . . . , xm )2 ,
hence p1 (x1 , . . . , xm ) | q1 (x1 , . . . , xm )2 . Since p1 , q1 are relatively prime, we then
have p1 (x1 , . . . , xm ) | q1 (x1 , . . . , xm ), contradicting the choice of p and q. Hence
f is almost surjective.
ON FUNCTION COMPOSITIONS THAT ARE POLYNOMIALS
9
(2)⇒(1): From Theorem 3.3, we obtain khf i ⊆ k(f ) ∩ k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. Since
f is almost surjective, Lemma 2.4 yields k(f ) ∩ k[t1 , . . . , tn ] = k[f ], and thus
khf i ⊆ k[f ]. The other inclusion is obvious.
Theorem 3.5. Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic χ > 0, let
m, n ∈ N, and let f = (f1 , . . . , fm ) be a sequence of algebraically independent
polynomials in k[t1 , . . . , tn ]. Then the following are equivalent:
(1) khf1 , . . . , fm i = radχ (k[f1 , . . . , fm ]).
(2) f is almost surjective.
Proof: (1)⇒(2): As in the proof of Theorem 3.4, we produce an f -determined
polynomial b and relatively prime p1 , q1 ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] with p1 ∤ q1 and
b(t1 , . . . , tn ) =
q1 (f1 , . . . , fm )2
.
p1 (f1 , . . . , fm )
ν
ν
Now suppose that there is ν ∈ N0 with bχ ∈ k[f1 , . . . , fm ]. Then p1 (f1 , . . . , fm )χ
divides
ν
ν
q1 (f1 , . . . , fm )2χ in k[f1 , . . . , fm ], and thus p1 (x1 , . . . , xm ) divides q1 (x1 , . . . , xm )2χ
in k[x1 , . . . , xm ]. Since p1 and q1 are relatively prime, we obtain p1 | q1 , contradicting the choice of p1 and q1 .
(1)⇒(2): From Theorem 3.3, we obtain khf i ⊆ radχ (k(f )∩k[t1 , . . . , tn ]). Since
f is almost surjective, Lemma 2.4 yields k(f ) ∩ k[t1 , . . . , tn ] = k[f ], and thus
khf i ⊆ radχ (k[f ]). The other inclusion follows from the fact that the map ϕ :
k → k, ϕ(y) := y χ is injective.
4. Function compositions that are polynomials
For a field k, let f = (f1 , . . . , fm ) ∈ (k[t1 , . . . , tn ])m , and let h : k m → k
be an arbitrary function. Then we write h ◦ f for the function defined by (h ◦
f ) (a) = h(f1 (a), . . . , fm (a)) for all a ∈ k n . For an algebraically closed field K
ν
of characteristic χ > 0, y ∈ K and ν ∈ N0 , we let s(χ ) (y) be the element in K
ν
ν
ν
with (s(χ ) (y))χ = y; so s(χ ) takes the χν -th root.
Theorem 4.1. Let k be a field, let K be its algebraic closure, let m, n ∈ N, let
g, f1 , . . . , fm ∈ k[t1 , . . . , tn ], and let h : K m → K be an arbitrary function. Let
R := f (K n ) be the range of the function from K n to K m that f = (f1 , . . . , fm )
induces on K. We assume that dim(K m \ R) ≤ m − 2, and that h ◦ f = g on K,
which means that
h(f (a)) = g(a) for all a ∈ K n .
Then we have:
(1) If k is of characteristic 0, then there is p ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that h(b) =
p(b) for all b ∈ R.
10
ERHARD AICHINGER
(2) If k is of characteristic χ > 0, then there is p ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] and ν ∈ N0
ν
such that h(b) = s(χ ) (p(b)) for all b ∈ R.
Proof: Let us first assume that k is of characteristic 0. We observe that as a
polynomial in K[t1 , . . . , tn ], g is f -determined. Hence by Theorem 3.4, there is
q ∈ K[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that q(f1 , . . . , fm ) = g. Writing
X
αi1 ,...,im xi11 · · · ximm ,
q=
P
(i1 ,...,im )∈I
im
we obtain g = (i1 ,...,im )∈I αi1 ,...,im f1i1 · · · fm
. Expanding the right hand side and
comparing coefficients, we see that (αi1 ,...,im )(i1 ,...,im )∈I is a solution of a linear
system with coefficients in k. Since this system has a solution over K, it also
has a solution over k. The solution over k provides the coefficients of a polynomial p ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that p(f1 , . . . , fm ) = g. From this, we obtain that
p(f1 (a), . . . , fm (a)) = g(a) for all a ∈ K n , and thus p(b) = h(b) for all b ∈ R.
This completes the proof of item (1).
In the case that k is of characteristic χ > 0, Theorem 3.5 yields a polynomial
ν
q ∈ K[x1 , . . . , xm ] and ν ∈ N0 such that q(f1 , . . . , fm ) = g χ . As in the previous
ν
case, we obtain p ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xm ] such that p(f1 , . . . , fm ) = g χ . Let b ∈ R,
ν
ν
and let a be such that f (a) = b. Then s(χ ) (p(b)) = s(χ ) (p(f (a))) = g(a) =
h(f (a)) = h(b), which completes the proof of (2).
We will now state the special case that k is algebraically closed and f is surjective in the following corollary. By a polynomial function, we will simply mean
a function induced by a polynomial with all its coefficients in k.
Corollary 4.2. Let k be an algebraically closed field, let f = (f1 , . . . , fm ) ∈
(k[t1 , . . . , tn ])m , and let h : k m → k be an arbitrary function. We assume that
f induces a surjective mapping from k n to k m and that h ◦ f is a polynomial
function. Then we have:
(1) If k is of characteristic 0, then h is a polynomial function.
ν
(2) If k is of characteristic χ > 0, then there is ν ∈ N0 such that hχ :
ν
(y1, . . . , ym ) 7→ h(y1 , . . . , ym )χ is a polynomial function.
References
1. E. Aichinger and S. Steinerberger, A proof of a theorem by Fried and MacRae and applications to the composition of polynomial functions, Arch. Math. (Basel) 97 (2011), no. 2,
115–124.
2. D. Cox, J. Little, and D. O’Shea, Ideals, varieties, and algorithms, third ed., Undergraduate
Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2007.
3. H. T. Engstrom, Polynomial substitutions, Amer. J. Math. 63 (1941), 249–255.
4. R. Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, no. 52, Springer-Verlag,
New York, 1977.
ON FUNCTION COMPOSITIONS THAT ARE POLYNOMIALS
11
5. A. van den Essen, Polynomial automorphisms and the Jacobian conjecture, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 190, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2000.
Erhard Aichinger, Institut für Algebra, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz,
4040 Linz, Austria
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: http://www.algebra.uni-linz.ac.at
| 0math.AC
|
Minimum Throughput Maximization in UAV-Aided
Wireless Powered Communication Networks
Junhee Park, Hoon Lee, Subin Eom, and Inkyu Lee, Fellow, IEEE
School of Electrical Eng., Korea University, Seoul, Korea
arXiv:1801.02781v1 [cs.IT] 9 Jan 2018
Email: {pjh0585, ihun1, esb777, inkyu}@korea.ac.kr
Abstract
This paper investigates unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-aided wireless powered communication
network (WPCN) systems where a mobile access point (AP) at the UAV serves multiple energyconstrained ground terminals (GTs). Specifically, the UAVs first charge the GTs by transmitting the
wireless energy transfer (WET) signals in the downlink. Then, by utilizing the harvested wireless
energy from the UAVs, the GTs send their uplink wireless information transmission (WIT) signals
to the UAVs. In this paper, depending on the operations of the UAVs, we adopt two different scenarios,
namely integrated UAV and separated UAV WPCNs. First, in the integrated UAV WPCN, a UAV acts
as a hybrid AP in which both energy transfer and information reception are processed at a single UAV.
In contrast, for the separated UAV WPCN, we consider two UAVs each of which behaves as an energy
AP and an information AP independently, and thus the energy transfer and the information decoding
are separately performed at two different UAVs. For both systems, we jointly optimize the trajectories
of the UAVs, the uplink power control, and the time resource allocation for the WET and the WIT
to maximize the minimum throughput of the GTs. Since the formulated problems are non-convex, we
apply the concave-convex procedure by deriving appropriate convex bounds for non-convex constraints.
As a result, we propose iterative algorithms which efficiently identify a local optimal solution for the
minimum throughput maximization problems. Simulation results verify the efficiency of the proposed
algorithms compared to conventional schemes.
Index Terms
UAV communication, energy harvesting, wireless powered communication networks (WPCNs),
trajectory optimizations.
2
I. I NTRODUCTION
Recently, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been adopted in many applications such as
weather monitoring and traffic control [1], and the usage of the UAV in wireless communication
systems has drawn great attentions [2]–[11]. Compared to conventional networks where APs are
fixed at given locations, wireless communication networks employing a UAV-mounted access
point (AP) exhibit cost-efficiency and deployment flexibility. Moreover, the mobility of the UAV
can provide an opportunity for the wireless networks to enhance the system capacity.
In [2]–[4], UAV-enabled relaying channels were studied where UAVs act as mobile relays
which forward the information of sources to destinations located on the ground. For the UAV
relay networks, deployment and direction control problems were investigated in [2], and the
work in [3] minimized the network outage probability when the UAV trajectory is given as a
circular path. The authors in [4] solved the throughput maximization problem by optimizing
the source and the relay transmit power allocation along with the UAV relay trajectory. In
addition, UAVs have been employed as mobile base stations in various wireless networks [5]–
[9]. The mobile base station placement problems were investigated in [5] and [6] in order to
maximize the overall wireless coverage. In [7], analytical expressions for the optimal UAV
height were derived to minimize the outage probability of air-to-ground links. The authors in
[8] focused on the theoretical energy consumption modeling for UAVs, and proposed trajectory
optimization methods for maximizing the energy efficiency of a UAV. Also, the trajectories of
multiple UAVs were examined in [9] to maximize the minimum throughput performance of
multiple ground terminals (GTs). Moreover, UAV-aided caching and mobile cloud computing
systems were researched in [10] and [11], respectively.
In the meantime, energy harvesting (EH) techniques based on radio frequency (RF) signals
have been considered as promising solutions for extending the lifetime of battery-limited wireless
devices [12]–[20]. By utilizing wireless energy transfer (WET) and wireless information transmission (WIT), the RF-based EH methods have been studied for traditional wireless communications,
and wireless powered communication networks (WPCN) protocols have been widely investigated
in recent literature [17]–[20].
Particularly, in the WPCN, a hybrid access point (H-AP) sends wireless energy via the RF
signals to energy-constrained devices in the downlink WET phase. In the subsequent uplink WIT
phase, the devices transmit their information signals to the H-AP by using the harvested energy.
3
In [17], throughput maximization problems were introduced for the WPCN by optimizing the
time resource allocated to users under the harvest-then-transmit protocol. The authors in [18]
proposed the multi-antenna energy beamforming and time allocation algorithms to maximize the
minimum throughput performance. The sum-rate maximization problems with a full-duplex HAP were investigated in [19] for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, and the precoding
methods for the multiple-input multiple-output WPCN was provided in [20]. Note that these
works were restricted to a static H-AP setup, and thus it would suffer from the ‘doubly near-far’
problem [17], which is induced by the doubly distance-dependent signal attenuation both in the
downlink and the uplink.
Recently, there have been several works combining mobile vehicle techniques and the WPCN
[21]–[27]. For the magnetic resonant based WET, [21]–[24] considered wireless charging vehicles
which travel the networks to supply power to wireless sensors. However, due to short charging
coverage of the magnetic resonance technique, the vehicles should stay quite a while to transfer
energy to nearby sensors. To overcome this limitation, the authors in [25] adopted the RF-based
WET methods to UAV-aided WPCN where a UAV flies towards a GT to transmit the RF energy
signal and receive uplink data. However, only a single GT case was considered in [25] under a
fixed line trajectory setup without optimizing the traveling path of the UAV. The works in [26]
and [27] also examined the UAV-enabled WET systems, but they did not take into account the
communications of GTs.
In this paper, we investigate the UAV-aided WPCN where multiple energy-constrained GTs
are served by UAVs with arbitrary trajectories. Depending on the roles of the UAVs, we classify
the UAV WPCN into two categories: integrated UAV and separated UAV WPCNs. First, in the
integrated UAV WPCN, a single UAV behaves as an H-AP which broadcasts the RF energy
signal to the GTs in the downlink WET phase and decodes the information from the GTs in the
uplink WIT phase. In contrast, in the separated UAV WPCN, the WET and WIT operations are
assigned to two different UAVs separately. In both systems, we adopt a time division multiple
access (TDMA) based harvest-then-transmit protocol in [17] where the WET of the UAVs and
the WIT at the GTs are performed over orthogonal time resources.
In our proposed systems, we jointly optimize the trajectories of the UAVs, the uplink power
control at the GTs, and the time resource allocation with the aim of maximizing the minimum
throughput performance among the GTs. Since the location of the UAVs changes continuously,
the time resource allocation in the UAV WPCN is totally different from that of the conventional
4
WPCN with static H-APs. Also, compared to [25] where the trajectory of the UAV is restricted
to a straight line, our systems consider a general traveling path optimization problem without
any constraints on the UAV trajectory.
As the problem is non-convex, we propose iterative algorithms to obtain the local optimal
solution by applying the alternating optimization method. To be specific, we first jointly optimize the trajectory of the UAVs and the uplink power of the GTs with given time allocation,
and then update the time resource allocation solution by fixing other variables. First, to find
the trajectory and the uplink power control solution, the concave-convex procedure (CCCP)
framework [28] [29] is employed which successively solves approximated convex problems of
the original problem. Next, the time allocation solution can be determined by applying linear
programming (LP). The convergence and the local optimality of the proposed algorithms are then
mathematically proved. From numerical results, we demonstrate that the proposed algorithms
substantially improve the performance of the UAV WPCN compared to conventional schemes.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section II explains a system model for the
UAV WPCN and formulates the minimum throughput maximization problems. In Sections III
and IV, we propose efficient algorithms for the integrated UAV and the separated UAV systems,
respectively. Section V presents simulation results for the proposed algorithms and compares
the performance with conventional schemes. Finally, the paper is terminated in Section VI with
conclusions.
Throughout this paper, normal and boldface letters represent scalar quantities and column
vectors, respectively. We denote the Euclidean space of dimension n as Rn , and (·)T indicates
the transpose operation. Also, |·| and k·k stand for the absolute value and the 2-norm, respectively.
II. S YSTEM M ODEL
As shown in Figure 1, we consider a UAV-aided WPCN where K single antenna GTs are
supported by single antenna UAVs which transmit and receive the RF signals. It is assumed that
the GTs do not have any embedded power supplies, while the UAVs are equipped with stable
and constant power sources. To communicate with the GTs, the UAVs travel through the area of
interest while transferring energy to the GTs in the downlink. By utilizing the harvested energy
from the UAV, the GTs send their information in the uplink. We assume that the UAVs fly at
a constant altitude of H with the maximum speed vmax for the time period T , whereas all the
GTs are fixed at given locations.
5
ݖ
ݖ
8$9 Downlink WET
8$9 Downlink WET
GT Uplink WIT
GT Uplink WIT
(࢞ࡵ(
(࢞(࢚),࢟(࢚),ࡴ)
࢚)
,࢟ࡵ (
࢚) ,ࡴ ) (࢞ࡱ(࢚),࢟ࡱ(࢚),ࡴ)
,'8$9
(78$9
ݕ
ݕ
ݔ
GT
࢞, ࢟,
GT ࡷ
࢞ࡷ, ࢟ࡷ,
GT
࢞, ࢟,
(a) Integrated UAV WPCN
ݔ
GT
࢞, ࢟,
GT
࢞, ࢟,
GT ࡷ
࢞ࡷ, ࢟ࡷ,
(b) Separated UAV WPCN
Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams of UAV-aided WPCNs.
Depending on the operations of the UAVs, we classify the UAV-aided WPCN into two
categories. First, in the integrated UAV WPCN illustrated in Figure 1(a), a single UAV transmits
energy and collects data of the GTs. Thus, the UAV in the integrated UAV WPCN acts as an
H-AP in the conventional WPCN [17]. Second, in the separated UAV WPCN in Figure 1(b), the
WET and the WIT are independently performed at two different UAVs. Therefore, each UAV
in the separated system is dedicated to the energy transferring (ET) or the information decoding
(ID). In the following, we present the system model for both UAV WPCN systems.
A. Integrated UAV WPCN
Let us denote p(t) = [xp (t), yp (t)]T as the position of the UAV at time instant t ∈ [0, T ] and
uk = [xk , yk ]T as the location of GT k ∈ K , {1, ..., K}, which is assumed to be known to
the UAV in advance. For ease of analysis, the total time period T is equally divided into N
time slots as in [9], where the number of time slots N is chosen as a sufficiently large number
such that the distance between the UAV and the GTs within each time slot can be considered
approximately static.
Therefore, the trajectory of the UAV can be represented by a sequence of locations {p[n]} at
each time slot n ∈ N , {1, ..., N} as
p[n] , p(nδN ) = [xp (nδN ), yp (nδN )]T ,
6
time slot ݊
time slot 1
ߜܰ = ܶ/ܰ
time slot ܰ
ߜܰ
ߜܰ
UAV
Downlink
WET
GT
Uplink
WIT
GT
Uplink
WIT
GT ࡷ
Uplink
WIT
߬0[݊]ߜܰ
߬1[݊]ߜܰ
߬2[݊]ߜܰ
߬ܰߜ]݊[ܭ
Fig. 2. Protocol structure for UAV-aided WPCN.
Wireless Communication Lab.
Korea University
where δN , T /N indicates the length of the time slot. Since we consider the discrete time
trajectory p[n] for n ∈ N , the maximum speed constraint can be expressed as
kp[n] − p[n − 1]k ≤ δN vmax , for n ∈ N̂ , {2, ..., N}.
For the air-to-ground channel between the UAV and the GTs, the deterministic propagation
model is adopted in this paper which assumes the line-of-sight links without the Doppler effect
[4], [8], [11]. Then, the average channel power gain γk [n] between the UAV and GT k at time
slot n is given by
γk [n] =
g0
, for n ∈ N and k ∈ K,
kp[n] − uk k2 + H 2
where g0 denotes the reference channel gain at distance of 1 meter.
Next, we explain the transmission protocol for the UAV-aided WPCN. As shown in Figure 2,
we divide each time slot n into K + 1 subslots, where the 0-th subslot of duration τ0 [n]δN is
allocated to the dedicated downlink WET and the k-th subslot of duration τk [n]δN for k ∈ K is
assigned to the uplink WIT of GT k. Note that the variable τk [n] accounts for the time durations
at the k-th subslot in time slot n. Thus we have the following constraints on the time resource
allocation variable τk [n] as
0 ≤ τk [n] ≤ 1, for n ∈ N and k ∈ K̆,
K
X
k=0
where K̆ , K ∪ {0}.
τk [n] ≤ 1, for n ∈ N ,
7
Now, we describe the WET and the WIT procedures of the integrated UAV WPCN. At the
0-th subslot of each time slot, the UAV broadcasts the wireless energy signals with the transmit
power P DL . Then, the harvested energy Ek [n] of GT k at time slot n can be written as
Ek [n] , τ0 [n]δN · ζk γk [n]P DL
ζk g0 P DL
, for n ∈ N and k ∈ K,
= τ0 [n]δN
kp[n] − uk k2 + H 2
where ζk ∈ (0, 1] stands for the energy harvesting efficiency of GT k. For simplicity, we assume
that all the GTs have the same energy harvesting efficiency, i.e., ζk = ζ for k ∈ K.
Due to the processing delay of EH circuits at the GTs, the harvested energy Ek [n] may
not be available at time slot n. Hence, GT k only can utilize Ek [n] at the future time slots
n + 1, n + 2, ..., N. Defining PkUL [n] as the uplink transmit power of GT k at time slot n, the
available energy Ẽk [n] at time slot n of GT k can be expressed as
Ẽk [n] =
n−1
X
Ek [i] −
i=1
n−1
X
τk [i]δN PkUL [i],
i=1
where the first and the second terms represent the cumulative harvested energy and the consumed
energy of GT k during the past time slots for i = 1, 2, ..., n − 1, respectively. As a result, the
uplink power constraint for GT k at time slot n is given as
τk [n]δN PkUL [n] ≤ Ẽk [n], for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
(1)
where we have PkUL [1] = 0 due to the EH circuit delay.
Also, the instantaneous throughput Rk [n] of GT k at time slot n can be obtained as
ηk γk [n]PkUL [n]
Rk [n] , log2 1 +
σ2
g0 ηk
PkUL [n]
= log2 1 + 2
, for n ∈ N and k ∈ K,
σ kp[n] − uk k2 + H 2
where ηk ∈ (0, 1] is a portion of the stored energy used for the uplink information transmission
at GT k. For simplicity, we assume ηk = η for k ∈ K. Then, the average throughput Rk of GT
k for the time period T can be written by
N
1 X
δN
τk [n]Rk [n]
T
n=2
N
1 X
g0 η
PkUL [n]
=
τk [n] log2 1 + 2
, for k ∈ K.
N n=2
σ kp[n] − uk k2 + H 2
Rk ,
(2)
8
In this paper, we aim to maximize the minimum average throughput of the GTs by jointly
optimizing the UAV trajectory {p[n]}, the uplink power control {PkUL[n]} at the GTs, and the
time resource allocation variables {τk [n]}. Denoting Rmin as the minimum throughput of the
GTs, the optimization problem can be formulated as
(P1)
max
Rmin ,{PkUL [n]},{p[n]},{τk [n]}
Rmin
N
g0 η
PkUL [n]
1 X
τk [n] log2 1 + 2
≥ Rmin , for k ∈ K,
s.t.
N n=2
σ kp[n] − uk k2 + H 2
n
X
τk [i]PkUL [i]
i=2
≤
n−1
X
i=1
τ0 [i]g0 ζk P DL
, for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
kp[i] − uk k2 + H 2
(3)
(4)
kp[n] − p[n − 1]k ≤ δN vmax , for n ∈ N̂ ,
(5)
kp[N] − p[1]k ≤ δN vmax ,
(6)
UL
0 ≤ PkUL [n] ≤ Pmax
, for n ∈ N and k ∈ K,
(7)
0 ≤ τk [n] ≤ 1, for n ∈ N and k ∈ K̆,
(8)
K
X
τk [n] = 1 for n ∈ N ,
(9)
k=0
where the uplink energy constraint in (4) is derived from (1), (6) indicates the periodical constraint
that the UAV needs to get back to the starting position after one time period T [9]1 , and (7) is
the peak uplink power constraint. One can check that (P1) is non-convex due to the constraints
in (3) and (4), and therefore it is not straightforward to obtain the globally optimal solution.
B. Separated UAV WPCN
In the separated UAV WPCN, we design the trajectories of two different UAVs, i.e., ID UAV
and ET UAV. Let us define pI [n] ∈ R2 and pE [n] ∈ R2 as the position of the ET UAV and the
ID UAV at time slot n, respectively. Similar to the integrated UAV WPCN, we adopt the TDMA
1
Depending on the application, one may want to determine the initial location and the final location of the UAV in advance.
In this case, we can simply add constraints on p[0] and p[N ] and discard the constraint in (6).
9
protocol in Figure 2. Then, the uplink energy constraint of GT k at time slot n and the average
throughput of GT k Rk,S can be respectively expressed as
!
DL
ζ
g
P
k
0
− τk [i]δN PkUL [i] ,
τk [n]δN PkUL [n] ≤
τ0 [n]δN
2
2
kp
E [i] − uk k + HE
i=1
N
g0 η
PkUL [n]
1 X
τk [n] log2
,
Rk,S ,
N n=2
σ 2 kpI [n] − uk k2 + HI2
n−1
X
where HI and HE stand for the flight altitude of the ID UAV and the ET UAV, respectively.
Thus, the minimum throughput maximization problem for the separated UAV WPCN is given
as
(P2)
max
Rmin ,{PkUL [n]},{pI [n]},
{pE [n]},{τk [n]}
Rmin
N
1 X
g0 η
PkUL [n]
s.t.
τk [n] log2 1 + 2
≥ Rmin , for k ∈ K,
N n=2
σ kpI [n] − uk k2 + HI2
n
X
τk [i]PkUL [i] ≤
i=2
n−1
X
i=1
τ0 [i]g0 ζk P DL
, for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
kpE [i] − uk k2 + HE2
(10)
(11)
x
kpx [n] − px [n − 1]k ≤ δN vmax
, for x ∈ {I, E} and n ∈ N̂ ,
(12)
x
kpx [N] − px [1]k ≤ δN vmax
, for x ∈ {I, E},
(13)
UL
0 ≤ PkUL [n] ≤ Pmax
, for n ∈ N and k ∈ K,
(14)
(8) - (9),
I
E
where vmax
and vmax
represent the maximum speed of the ID UAV and the ET UAV, respectively.
This problem is also non-convex due to the constraints (10) and (11). In the following sections,
we present efficient approaches for solving (P1) and (P2).
III. P ROPOSED S OLUTION
FOR I NTEGRATED
UAV WPCN
In this section, we propose an iterative algorithm for (P1) which yields a local optimal solution.
To this end, we employ the alternating optimization framework which first finds a solution for
the trajectory {p[n]} and the uplink power {PkUL [n]} with given time resource allocation {τk [n]},
and then computes {τk [n]} by fixing {p[n]} and {PkUL [n]}.
10
A. Joint Trajectory and Uplink Power Optimization
For a given time resource allocation {τk [n]}, (P1) can be simplified as
max
Rmin ,{PkUL [n]},{p[n]}
s.t.
Rmin
(15)
(3) - (7).
Problem (15) is still non-convex due to the constraints in (3) and (4). To tackle this difficulty,
let us first introduce auxiliary variables {zk [n]} such that kp[n] − uk k2 ≤ zk [n] for k ∈ K
and n ∈ N . Then, the left hand side (LHS) of (3) and the right hand side (RHS) of (4) are
respectively lower-bounded by
N
N
g0 η UL
g0 η UL
P [n]
P [n]
1 X
1 X
σ2 k
σ2 k
τk [n] log2 1 +
τk [n] log2 1 +
≥
,
N n=2
kp[n] − uk k2 + H 2
N n=2
zk [n] + H 2
n−1
X
i=1
n−1
X
g0 ζP DL
g0 ζP DL
τ0 [i]
≥
τ
[i]
.
0
kp[i] − uk k2 + H 2
zk [i] + H 2
i=1
For these bounds, we can construct an equivalent problem for (15) based on the following lemma.
Lemma 1: The optimal solution for the problem (15) can be obtained by solving the following
optimization problem:
(P1.1)
max
Rmin ,{PkUL [n]},{p[n]},{zk [n]}
Rmin
N
g0 η PkUL [n]
1 X
τk [n] log2 1 + 2
≥ Rmin , for k ∈ K,
s.t.
N n=2
σ zk [n] + H 2
n
X
τk [i]PkUL [i] ≤
n−1
X
i=1
i=2
2
τ0 [i]
g0 ζk P DL
, for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
zk [i] + H 2
kp[n] − uk k ≤ zk [n], for n ∈ N and k ∈ K,
(16)
(17)
(18)
(5) - (7).
∗
Proof: First, let Rmin
and R̃min denote the optimal value of problem (15) and (P1.1),
∗
respectively. Then it can easily be checked that Rmin
≥ R̃min , where the equality holds when
zk [n] = kp[n] − uk k2 , ∀n and ∀k. Next, by contradiction, we will prove that the optimum of
(P1.1) can be attained when zk [n] = kp[n] − uk k2 . Suppose that there exists at least one zk [n]
satisfying zk [n] > kp[n]−uk k2 at the optimum of (P1.1) and denote a set of such k as K′ ⊂ K. If
the equality holds in (16) for k ′ ∈ K′ , the minimum throughput R̃min can be increased by reducing
zk′ [n] so that constraints (16) and (17) hold with equality. This contradicts the assumption. Even
11
if the equality does not hold in (16) for k ′ at the optimum, decreasing zk′ [n] does not affect
the minimum throughput R̃min . Therefore, for all these cases, we can always find the optimal
zk [n] for (P1.1) satisfying zk [n] = kp[n] − uk k2 . As a result, the optimal solution of (15) can
be equivalently obtained by solving (P1.1).
Still, (P1.1) is non-convex in general. Thus, we provide the CCCP [28] approach to address
(P1.1). First, we consider the throughput constraint in (16). By using a first-order Taylor approximation at zk [n] = ẑk [n], we can derive a concave lower bound for the LHS of (16) as
zk [n] + H 2 + gσ02η PkUL [n]
g0 η PkUL [n]
zk [n] + H 2
log2 1 + 2
≥
log
−
+1
2
σ zk [n] + H 2
ẑk [n] + H 2
ẑk [n] + H 2
, RkL [n](zk [n], PkUL [n] | ẑk [n]).
(19)
Note that RkL [n](zk [n], PkUL [n] | ẑk [n]) is a jointly concave function with respect to zk [n] and
PkUL [n], and gives a tight lower bound in which equality holds at ẑk [n] = zk [n]. In a similar way,
the RHS of constraint (17), which is convex with respect to zk [n], can be lower-bounded by
zk [n] + H 2
τ0 [n]δN ζg0P DL
ζk g0 P DL
2−
≥
τ0 [n]δN
zk [n] + H 2
ẑk [n] + H 2
ẑk [n] + H 2
, EkL [n](zk [n] | ẑk [n]).
(20)
With (19) and (20) at hand, an approximated convex problem for (P1.1) with given ẑk [n] can
be formulated as
(P1.1A)
max
Rmin ,{PkUL [n]},{p[n]},{zk [n]}
Rmin
N
1 X
s.t.
τk [n]RkL [n](zk [n], PkUL [n] | ẑk [n]) ≥ Rmin , for k ∈ K,
N n=2
n
X
τk [i]PkUL [i]
i=2
(5) - (7), (18).
(21)
n−1
1 X L
≤
E [i](zk [i] | ẑk [i]), for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
δN i=1 k
(22)
(P1.1A) can be solved by existing convex solvers, e.g., CVX [30]. Since the feasible region of
(P1.1A) is a subset of that of the original problem (P1.1), we can always obtain a lower bound
solution for problem (P1.1) from its approximation (P1.1A).
As a result, a solution for (P1.1) can be calculated by iteratively solving (P1.1A) based on
(i)
the CCCP. At the i-th iteration of the CCCP algorithm, we compute the solution zk [n] and
UL(i)
Pk
(i−1)
[n] of (P1.1A) by setting ẑk [n] = zk
(i)
UL(i)
[n], where zk [n] and Pk
determined at the i-th iteration. In this algorithm, we set
(0)
zk [n]
to
(0)
zk [n]
[n] are the solution
= kp[n] − uk k2 for
12
all n ∈ N and k ∈ K. It has been proved that this CCCP method converges to at least a local
optimal point [28]. Note that for solving (P1.1) with the CCCP, we need to carefully initialize
{p[n]}. This will be clearly explained in Section III-C.
B. Time Resource Allocation
Now, we identify a solution for the time resource allocation {τk [n]} for given {p[n]} and
{PkUL [n]}. The problem is written as
(P1.2)
max
Rmin ,{τk [n]}
Rmin
N
1 X
Ak [n]τk [n] ≥ Rmin , for k ∈ K,
s.t.
N n=2
n
X
PkUL [i]τk [i] ≤
i=2
Bk [i]τ0 [i], for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
(24)
i=1
(8) - (9),
where Ak [n] , log2 1 +
n−1
X
(23)
PkUL [n]
g0 η
2
2
2
σ kp[n]−uk k +H
and Bk [n] ,
g0 ζk P DL
.
kp[n]−uk k2 +H 2
It can be shown that
(P1.2) is a convex LP, which can be optimally solved by the standard LP optimization tools.
Algorithm 1: Proposed Algorithm for (P1)
(q)
Initialize τk [n] and p(q) [n], ∀n and ∀k, and set q = 0.
Repeat
(q,i)
Set q ← q + 1, i ← 0 and zk
[n] = kp(q−1) [n] − uk k2 , ∀n and ∀k.
Repeat
(q,i)
Set ẑk [n] = zk
[n], ∀n and ∀k.
(q−1)
Solve (P1.1A) for given {τk
[n]} by using the CVX.
Update i ← i + 1.
Until convergence.
UL(q)
Update p(q) [n] = p(q,i) [n] and Pk
(q)
(q)
UL(q,i)
[n] = Pk
[n], ∀n and ∀k.
UL(q)
Compute Rmin and {τk [n]} from (P1.2) for given {p(q) [n]} and {Pk
(q)
Until Rmin converges.
[n]}.
13
As a result, a solution of (P1) can be obtained by employing the alternating optimization
framework and the overall process is given in Algorithm 1. In this algorithm, (P1.1) and (P1.2)
are iteratively solved by fixing {τk [n]} and {p[n], PkUL [n]}, respectively. To be specific, at the
(q−1)
q-th iteration, Algorithm 1 first successively solves (P1.1A) for given {τk
[n]} based on the
CCCP until the objective value converges. Note that we denote the solution obtained at the i-th
UL(q,i)
iteration of the CCCP method as {p(q,i) [n], Pk
computed for given
UL(q)
{p(q) [n], Pk
[n]},
(q,i)
[n], zk
[n]}. Then, a solution of (P1.2) is
and this procedure is repeated until convergence.
(q)
(q)
Now, we verify the convergence of Algorithm 1. Let us define R̃min and Rmin as the objective
value from the CCCP for (P1.1) and the optimal value of (P1.2) at the q-th iteration, respectively.
(q)
(q+1)
Then, it is obvious that Rmin ≤ R̃min
since the CCCP algorithm monotonically increases
the objective value of (P1.1A) with respect to the iteration index i. Also, due to the fact that
(q+1)
Rmin
(q+1)
R̃min
UL(q+1)
is the global optimal value of (P1.2) for given {p(q+1) [n]} and {Pk
≤
[n]}, it follows
(q+1)
Rmin .
As a result, we have
(q)
(q+1)
Rmin ≤ R̃min
(q+1)
≤ Rmin ,
(q)
which implies that Rmin is non-decreasing with respect to the iteration index q. Because the
minimum throughput Rmin is upper-bounded by a certain value, Algorithm 1 is guaranteed to
converge. It is worth noting that the solutions at each iteration of Algorithm 1 are given by
the local optimum and the global optimum for (P1.1) and (P1.2), respectively. For this reason,
Algorithm 1 always yields at least a local optimal point for (P1).
C. Trajectory Initialization
In this subsection, we present a simple initialization method for Algorithm 1. Although the
time resource allocation {τk [n]} satisfying (8) and (9) can be initialized without problems, it is
not easy to determine the feasible initial trajectory {p[n]} due to the complicated constraints
in (5) and (6). Thus, we apply the circular path scheme in [9] to our scenario whose center
c = [xc yc ]T and radius r on xy-plane are respectively set to
c ,
K
1 X
uk ,
K
k=1
r , max(r md, r max ),
14
where c represents the centroid of the GTs, and r md ,
1
K
PK
k=1
kc − uk k and r max ,
vmax T
2π
indicate the mean distance between c and the GTs and the maximum allowable radius of the
path with given speed constraint vmax , respectively. Thereby, the initial UAV trajectory becomes
2πn
2πn T
p[n] = [xc + r cos
yc + r sin
] , for n ∈ N .
(25)
N
N
Note that for Algorithm 1, the time resource allocation {τk [n]} should also be initialized. The
details will be discussed in Section V.
IV. P ROPOSED S OLUTION
FOR
S EPARATED UAV WPCN
In this section, we present an efficient algorithm for (P2) based on the alternating optimization.
Similar to the integrated UAV WPCN, we first finds a solution for the trajectories {pI [n]} and
{pE [n]} and the uplink power {PkUL [n]} for given {τk [n]}, and then computes {τk [n]} for fixed
{pI [n]}, {pE [n]}, and {PkUL [n]}. The details are described in the following subsections.
A. Joint Trajectories and Uplink Power Optimization
In this subsection, we optimize {pI [n]}, {pE [n]}, and {PkUL [n]} with given {τk [n]}. In this
case, (P2) can be simplified as
max
Rmin ,{PkUL [n]},{pI [n]},{pE [n]}
s.t.
Rmin
(26)
(10) - (14).
To solve the non-convex problem (26), similar to (P1.1), we introduce new auxiliary variables
{zkI [n]} and {zkE [n]} such that kpI [n] − uk k2 ≤ zkI [n] and kpE [n] − uk k2 ≤ zkE [n] for k ∈ K and
n ∈ N.
Then, problem (26) can be reformulated as
(P2.1)
max
Rmin ,{PkUL [n]},{pI [n]},
{pE [n]},{zkI [n]},{zkE [n]}
Rmin
N
g0 η PkUL [n]
1 X
τk [n] log2 1 + 2 I
≥ Rmin , for k ∈ K,
s.t.
N n=2
σ zk [n] + HI2
n
X
τk [i]PkUL [i]
≤
i=2
2
kpI [n] − uk k ≤
n−1
X
τ0 [i]
i=1
zkI [n],
g0 ζk P DL
, for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
zkE [i] + HE2
(27)
(28)
for n ∈ N and k ∈ K,
(29)
kpE [n] − uk k2 ≤ zkE [n], for n ∈ N and k ∈ K,
(30)
(12) - (14).
15
The equivalence between problem (26) and (P2.1) can be easily verified by a similar approach
in Lemma 1 since we have kpI [n] − uk k2 = zkI [n] and kpE [n] − uk k2 = zkE [n] at the optimal
point of (P2.1).
As in (P1.1), we can check that (P2.1) with the non-convex constraints (27) and (28) is the
difference of convex problem which can be handled by the CCCP method [28]. Thus, at each
iteration of the CCCP algorithm, we address the following approximated convex problem as
(P2.1A)
max
Rmin ,{PkUL [n]},{pI [n]},
{pE [n]},{zkI [n]},{zkE [n]}
Rmin
N
1 X
τk [n]RkL [n](zkI [n], PkUL [n] | ẑkI [n]) ≥ Rmin , for k ∈ K,
s.t.
N n=2
n
X
τk [i]PkUL [i]
i=2
(31)
n−1
1 X L
E [i](zkE [i] | ẑkE [i]), for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
≤
δN i=1 k
(32)
(12) - (14), (29) - (30),
where the approximations in (31) and (32) are obtained from (19) and (20), respectively. Therefore, we can compute a local optimal solution for (P2.1) by iteratively solving (P2.1A) with
I(i)
E(i)
ẑkI [n] = zk [n] and ẑkE [n] = zk
[n] for n ∈ N and k ∈ K, whose convergence has been shown
in [28]. The overall procedure is similar to that for (P1.1) and thus omitted here for brevity.
B. Time Resource Allocation
With given {pI [n]}, {pE [n]}, and {PkUL [n]}, we now determine the time resource allocation
solution {τk [n]}. The problem is written as
(P2.2)
max
Rmin ,{τk [n]}
Rmin
N
1 X I
A [n]τk [n] ≥ Rmin , for k ∈ K,
s.t.
N n=2 k
n
X
PkUL [i]τk [i] ≤
i=2
BkE [i]τ0 [i], for n ∈ N̂ and k ∈ K,
(34)
i=1
(8) - (9),
where AIk [n] , log2 1 +
n−1
X
(33)
PkUL [n]
g0 η
σ2 kpI [n]−uk k2 +H 2
and BkE [n] ,
g0 ζk P DL
.
kpE [n]−uk k2 +H 2
One can check that
(P2.2) is a convex LP which can be optimally solved by the standard LP solver.
Finally, we can obtain a local optimal solution of (P2) by applying the alternating optimization
where we first identify a solution of (P2.1) via the CCCP algorithm, and then update {τk [n]} from
16
60
40
GTs
Integrated
Separated (ID UAV)
Separated (ET UAV)
y-axis [m]
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
x-axis [m]
Fig. 3. Trajectories of UAVs optimized by the proposed algorithms for T = 30 sec.
(P2.2). This procedure is repeated until the minimum throughput converges. The convergence
and the local optimality of such a process can be directly verified by following the convergence
proof of Algorithm 1, and thus are omitted. Also, for initializing the trajectories of two UAVs
{pI [n]} and {pE [n]}, we can adopt the circular trajectory scheme presented in Section III-C.
V. S IMULATION R ESULTS
In this section, we evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms by numerical results.
Unless stated otherwise, the maximum uplink power constraint at the GTs and the downlink
UL
transmission power at the UAVs are equal to Pmax
= −10 dBm and P DL = 30 dBm, respectively.
Also, ζ and η are fixed as ζ = 0.6 and η = 0.9, respectively. We set the reference channel gain
g0 to g0 = −30 dB and the noise variance is given by σ 2 = −90 dBm. The speed of the UAVs
is limited to vmax = 5 m/s and the altitude of the UAVs is fixed to H = HI = HE = 8 m.
For simulations, we adopt a system with seven GTs (K = 7), whose locations are marked by
squares in Figure 3. The initial time resource allocation {τk [n]} for the proposed algorithms is
determined as τk [n] =
1
,
K+1
∀n and ∀k.
17
60
40
GTs
Integrated
Separated (ID UAV)
Separated (ET UAV)
y-axis [m]
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
40
60
x-axis [m]
Fig. 4. Trajectories of UAVs optimized by the proposed algorithms for T = 50 sec.
60
40
GTs
Integrated
Separated (ID UAV)
Separated (ET UAV)
y-axis [m]
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-60
-40
-20
0
20
x-axis [m]
Fig. 5. Trajectories of UAVs optimized by the proposed algorithms for T = 100 sec.
18
Figures 3-5 illustrate the optimized trajectories of the UAVs in the integrated UAV and the
separated UAV WPCNs for T = 30, 50, and 100 sec, respectively. The triangular and circular
markers represent the positions of UAVs sampled at every 10 sec. First, in Figure 3, we can see
that the UAV in the integrated UAV WPCN tries to cover all GTs by traveling a path whose
center is close to the centroid of the GTs. In contrast, in the separated system, two UAVs mainly
cover two different areas so that the ET UAV flies over the upper-right side of the area, while the
ID UAV gets around the lower-left side. This is because when T = 30 sec, the time period is not
enough for two UAVs to visit all the GTs. Therefore, by sectorizing the area, the separated UAV
WPCN can transfer energy and receive information more efficiently compared to the integrated
WPCN. This tendency also can be observed in Figure 4. Note that the minimum throughput
performance of the separated UAV WPCN is 51% and 31% larger than that of the integrated
UAV WPCN for T = 30 and 50 sec, respectively.
In Figure 5, the optimized trajectory for the integrated UAV WPCN converges to a path
consisting of line segments which connect the locations of the GTs for large T as in [9].
Nevertheless, the separated UAV WPCN still exhibits non-trivial trajectories due to the decoupled
WET and WIT operations. When T = 100 sec, the minimum throughput performance of the
separated UAV WPCN is about 15% larger than that of the integrated UAV WPCN.
Figure 6 illustrates the minimum throughput performance of the proposed algorithms with
respect to the time interval T . For comparison, we also plot the performance of the following
baseline schemes.
•
Static AP: The conventional WPCN [17] with a static H-AP is adopted where the H-AP is
fixed at the centroid of GTs with the altitude of H = 8 m. The time resource allocation
solution is optimized from the algorithm presented in [17].
•
Circular trajectory: The UAVs follow the circular path presented in Section III-C. Then,
the uplink power and the time resource allocation are optimized from Algorithm 1 with
fixed {p[n]} in (25). Note that with the circular trajectory, both the integrated UAV and the
separated UAV WPCNs achieve the same minimum rate performance.
•
Equal time allocation (ETA): With equal time resource allocation τk [n] =
1
,
K+1
∀n and ∀k,
the uplink power and the trajectory of the UAV are obtained from (P1.1) by applying the
CCCP algorithm explained in Section III-A.
•
Naive power control (NPC): With the trajectory and the time resource allocation optimizations based on the proposed algorithms, each GT uses all of the energy harvested at
19
0.5
Proposed (separated)
Proposed (integrated)
NPC (separated)
NPC (integrated)
ETA (separated)
ETA (integrated)
Circular trajectory
Static
0.45
Minimum throughput [bps/Hz]
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
Time period T [sec]
Fig. 6. Minimum throughput with respect to time interval T for various systems.
the previous time slot for WIT. If the stored energy at the GT exceeds the uplink power
UL
UL
constraint, i.e., Ek [n − 1] > δN τk [n]Pmax
, the GT transmits the information signal with Pmax
at the n-th time slot.
From Figure 6, we can check that even when the trajectory is simply set to the circular path,
the minimum throughput can be improved compared to the conventional static WPCN. Also, the
ETA case shows a performance enhancement by optimizing the trajectory of the UAV without the
time resource allocation. These infer that the mobility of the UAV well compensates the doubly
near-far problem of the static WPCN. Although the NPC scheme naively controls the uplink
power, the minimum throughput is further improved in comparison with other baseline schemes
by jointly optimizing the UAV trajectories and the time resource allocation. The minimum
throughput performance of the proposed algorithms increases as the time period T grows, and the
performance increment becomes smaller for a large T . In addition, the performance gap between
the proposed schemes and the conventional methods grows with T . Note that this indicates that
the optimization of the UAV trajectories and the time resource allocation can bring a huge gain
on system performance, and thus these are critical design factors. Moreover, the separated UAV
20
0.5
T = 100 sec
0.45
Minimum throughput [bps/Hz]
0.4
0.35
0.3
Separated
Integrated
0.25
T = 50 sec
0.2
0.15
T = 30 sec
0.1
0.05
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Number of iterations
7
8
9
10
Fig. 7. Convergence of the proposed algorithms.
WPCN always performs better than the integrated UAV WPCN in the proposed scheme, while
the baseline schemes do not exhibit such advantages. This can be attributed to a fact that in the
NPC and the ETA schemes, both the ID and the ET UAV trajectories in the separated system
converge to the same trajectory, due to the limited energy causality and time resource allocation.
Therefore, we can conclude that jointly optimization of trajectories, uplink power control and
time resource allocation is important for the UAV WPCNs.
In Figure 7, we show the convergence of the proposed algorithms for the UAV WPCNs. We
observe that for all time periods, the proposed algorithms for the integrated UAV WPCN seem
to converge within one iteration, while that for the separated UAV WPCN requires about three
iterations for convergence.
VI. C ONCLUSION
This paper has investigated the UAV WPCN where mobile UAVs support the WET and
the WIT of multiple GTs. For both the integrated UAV and the separated UAV WPCNs, we
have jointly optimized the trajectories of the UAVs, the uplink power at the GTs, and the time
21
resource allocation strategies in order to maximize the minimum throughput among the GTs.
To solve these non-convex problems, we have adopted the alternating optimization framework
and the CCCP algorithm. As a result, a locally optimal solution of the original non-convex
problems has been efficiently computed by the proposed algorithms whose convergence has
been mathematically proved. From the simulation results, we have demonstrated the efficiency
of the proposed algorithms over the conventional schemes.
R EFERENCES
[1] Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, “Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges,”
IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, pp. 36–42, May 2016.
[2] P. Zhan, K. Yu, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Wireless Relay Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Performance
and Optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 47, pp. 2068–2085, Jul. 2011.
[3] F. Ono, H. Ochiai, and R. Miura, “A Wireless Relay Network Based on Unmanned Aircraft System With Rate
Optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, pp. 7699–7708, Nov. 2016.
[4] Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, “Throughput Maximization for UAV-Enabled Mobile Relaying Systems,” IEEE
Transactions on Communications, vol. 64, pp. 4983–4995, Dec. 2016.
[5] J. Lyu, Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, “Placement Optimization of UAV-Mounted Mobile Base Stations,” IEEE
Communications Letters, vol. 21, pp. 604–607, Mar. 2017.
[6] M. Alzenad, A. El-Keyi, F. Lagum, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “3-D Placement of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Base Station
(UAV-BS) for Energy-Efficient Maximal Coverage,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 6, pp. 434–437, Aug.
2017.
[7] M. Azari, F. Rosas, K.-C. Chen, and S. Pollin, “Ultra Reliable UAV Communication Using Altitude and Cooperation
Diversity,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, to be published. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02877.
[8] Y. Zeng and R. Zhang, “Energy-Efficient UAV Communication With Trajectory Optimization,” IEEE Transactions on
Wireless Communications, vol. 16, pp. 3747–3760, Jun. 2017.
[9] Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Joint Trajectory and Communication Design for Multi-UAV Enabled Wireless Networks,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02723v1, May 2017.
[10] M. Chen, M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, C. Yin, M. Debbah, and C. S. Hong, “Caching in the Sky: Proactive Deployment
of Cache-Enabled Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Optimized Quality-of-Experience,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in
Communications, vol. 35, pp. 1046–1061, May 2017.
[11] S. Jeong, O. Simeone, and J. Kang, “Mobile Edge Computing via a UAV-Mounted Cloudlet: Optimization of Bit
Allocation and Path Planning,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, to be published. [Online]. Available:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05362.
[12] R. Zhang and C. K. Ho, “MIMO Broadcasting for Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer,” IEEE
Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, pp. 1989–2001, May 2013.
[13] Q. Shi, L. Liu, W. Xu, and R. Zhang, “Joint Transmit Beamforming and Receive Power Splitting for MISO SWIPT
Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, pp. 3269–3280, Jun. 2014.
[14] H. Lee, S.-R. Lee, K.-J. Lee, H.-B. Kong, and I. Lee, “Optimal Beamforming Designs for Wireless Information and Power
Transfer in MISO Interference Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, pp. 4810–4821, Sep.
2015.
22
[15] C. Song, J. Park, B. Clerckx, I. Lee, and K.-J. Lee, “Generalized Precoder Designs Based on Weighted MMSE Criterion for
Energy Harvesting Constrained MIMO and Multi-User MIMO Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,
vol. 15, pp. 7941–7954, Dec. 2016.
[16] J. Kim, H. Lee, C. Song, and I. Lee, “Sum Throughput Maximization for Multi-User MIMO Cognitive Wireless Powered
Communication Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, pp. 913–923, Feb. 2017.
[17] H. Ju and R. Zhang, “Throughput Maximization in Wireless Powered Communication Networks,” IEEE Transactions on
Wireless Communications, vol. 13, pp. 418–428, Jan. 2014.
[18] L. Liu, R. Zhang, and K.-C. Chua, “Multi-Antenna Wireless Powered Communication With Energy Beamforming,” IEEE
Transactions on Communications, vol. 62, pp. 4349–4361, Dec. 2014.
[19] H. Kim, H. Lee, M. Ahn, H.-B. Kong, and I. Lee, “Joint Subcarrier and Power Allocation Methods in Full Duplex
Wireless Powered Communication Networks for OFDM Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15,
pp. 4745–4753, Jul. 2016.
[20] H. Lee, K.-J. Lee, H.-B. Kong, and I. Lee, “Sum-Rate Maximization for Multiuser MIMO Wireless Powered Communication
Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 65, pp. 9420–9424, Nov. 2016.
[21] Y. Shi, L. Xie, Y. Hou, and H. D. Sherali, “On Renewable Sensor Networks with Wireless Energy Transfer,” In Proc.
IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 1350–1358, Apr. 2011.
[22] L. Xie, Y. Shi, Y. T. Hou, and H. D. Sherali, “Making Sensor Networks Immortal: An Energy-Renewal Approach With
Wireless Power Transfer,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 20, pp. 1748–1761, Dec. 2012.
[23] S. Guo, C. Wang, and Y. Yang, “Joint Mobile Data Gathering and Energy Provisioning in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor
Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 13, pp. 2836–2852, Dec. 2014.
[24] M. Zhao, J. Li, and Y. Yang, “A Framework of Joint Mobile Energy Replenishment and Data Gathering in Wireless
Rechargeable Sensor Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 13, pp. 2689–2705, Dec. 2014.
[25] T. Li, P. Fan, Z. Chen, and K. B. Letaief, “Optimum Transmission Policies for Energy Harvesting Sensor Networks Powered
by a Mobile Control Center,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, pp. 6132–6145, Sep. 2016.
[26] L. Fu, P. Cheng, Y. Gu, J. Chen, and T. He, “Optimal Charging in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks,” IEEE
Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 65, pp. 278–291, Jan. 2016.
[27] J. Xu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “UAV-Enabled Wireless Power Transfer: Trajectory Design and Energy Region Characterization,” to be presented in IEEE Globecom 2017, Dec. 2017.
[28] L. T. H. An and P. D. Tao, “The DC (Difference of Convex Functions) Programming and DCA Revisited with DC Models
of Real World Nonconvex Optimization Problems,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 133, pp. 23–46, Jan. 2005.
[29] Y. Sun, P. Babu, and D. P. Palomar, “Majorization-Minimization Algorithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and
Machine Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, pp. 794–816, Feb. 2017.
[30] M. Grant and S. Boyd, “CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1.” http://cvxr.com/cvx,
2017.
| 7cs.IT
|
Predicting potential treatments for complex
diseases based on miRNA and tissue
specificity
Liang Yu*
School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071,
P.R.China
[email protected]
*Corresponding author
Jin Zhao
School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071,
P.R.China
[email protected]
Lin Gao
School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071,
P.R.China
[email protected]
Abstract
Network-based computational method, with the emphasis on biomolecular
interactions and biological data integration, has succeeded in drug development and
created new directions, such as drug repositioning and drug combination. Drug
repositioning, that is finding new uses for existing drugs to treat more patients, offers
time, cost and efficiency benefits in drug development, especially when in silico
techniques are used. microRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in multiple
biological processes and have attracted much scientific attention recently. Moreover,
cumulative studies demonstrate that the mature miRNAs as well as their precursors
can be targeted by small molecular drugs. At the same time, human diseases result
from the disordered interplay of tissue- and cell lineage-specific processes. However,
few computational researches predict drug-disease potential relationships based on
miRNA data and tissue specificity. Therefore, based on miRNA data and the tissue
specificity of diseases, we propose a new method named as miTS to predict the
potential treatments for diseases. Firstly, based on miRNAs data, target genes and
information of FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved drugs, we evaluate the
relationships between miRNAs and drugs in the tissue-specific PPI (protein-protein)
network. Then, we construct a tripartite network: drug-miRNA-disease Finally, we
obtain the potential drug-disease associations based on the tripartite network. In this
paper, we take breast cancer as case study and focus on the top-30 predicted drugs. 25
of them (83.3%) are found having known connections with breast cancer in CTD
(Comparative Toxicogenomics Database) benchmark and the other 5 drugs are
potential drugs for breast cancer. We further evaluate the 5 newly predicted drugs
from clinical records, literature mining, KEGG pathways enrichment analysis and
overlapping genes between enriched pathways. For each of the 5 new drugs, strongly
supported evidences can be found in three or more aspects. In particular, Regorafenib
(DB08896) has 15 overlapping KEGG pathways with breast cancer and their p-values
are all very small. In addition, whether in the literature curation or clinical validation,
Regorafenib has a strong correlation with breast cancer. All the facts show that
Regorafenib is likely to be a truly effective drug, worthy of our further study. It
further follows that our method miTS is effective and practical for predicting new
drug indications, which will provide potential values for treatments of complex
diseases.
Keywords: drug repositioning; miRNAs; tissue specificity; module distance
Introduction
The identification of therapeutic approaches for the treatment of cancer is an arduous,
costly, and often inefficient process. By conservative estimates, it now takes over 15
years and $800 million to $1 billion to bring a new drug to market 1 . Drug
repositioning, which is the discovery of new indications for existing drugs, is an
increasingly attractive mode of therapeutic discovery. A repositioned drug does not
need the initial six to nine years required for the development of new drugs, but
instead goes directly to preclinical testing and clinical trials, thus reducing risk and
costs 2 . Repositioning drugs has been implemented in several ways. One of the
well-known examples is sildenafil citrate, which was repositioned from a
hypertension drug to a therapy for erectile dysfunction3. Drugs treat diseases by
targeting the proteins related to the phenotypes arising from the disease. However,
drug development does not accurately follow the “one gene, one drug, one disease”
principle, which has been challenged in many cases 4 and the traditional drug
repositioning methods by accident makes it hard to satisfy medical needs by
successfully repositioning a large number of existing drugs. Computational methods
are able to solve this question by high-level integration of available biological data
and elucidation of unknown mechanisms.
In recent years, systems biology continues to make important progress to solve
fundamental problems in biology and leading to practical applications in medicine
and drug discovery5. Network-based computational systems biology emphasizes the
interactions among biomolecules and highlights the network concept. Typically, a
network comprises a set of nodes and edges, and is described by graph theory in a
mathematical manner6. A node can be a biological molecule, for example, gene, RNA,
protein, metabolite, and pathway. A node can also be at the phenotype level such as
disease and drug. An edge can represent the complex interaction between two nodes
such as protein-protein interaction, drug-disease therapeutic relationship, drug-protein
target relationship, and so on. The accumulation of different high-throughput biology
data, such as gene expression data, miRNA expression data and drug-target data, has
made the reconstruction of biomolecular and cellular networks possible. Cheng et al.
built a bipartite graph composed of the approved drugs and proteins linked by drug
target binary associations, and relied on a supervised network-based inference method
to predict drug-target interactions7. Chen et al. constructed a general heterogeneous
network which comprised drugs and proteins linked by protein-protein sequence
similarity, drug-drug chemical similarity, and the known drug-target interaction8. Yeh
et al.9 developed a network flow approach for identifying potential target proteins,
which have a strong influence on disease genes in the context of biomolecular
networks. The biomolecular networks are weighted by degree of co-expression of
interacting protein pair.
More recently, many studies have demonstrated that drugs can regulate microRNA
(miRNAs) expression and mature miRNAs as well as their precursors can be targeted
by small molecular drugs10,11,12,13. For example, Miravirsen (SPC3649) is the first
miRNA-targeted drug in clinical trials, which can successfully inhibit miR-122
expression that is required by hepatitis C virus replication14. The expression levels of
32 miRNAs (significant up-regulation of 22 miRNAs and down-regulation of 10
miRNAs) were changed after the treatment of trichostatin A in human breast cancer
cell lines
15
. miRNAs are non-coding small RNAs (∼23 nucleotides) that
downregulate gene expression at the post transcriptional level by inhibiting translation
or initiating mRNA degradation and are dysregulated in most of human cancers16.
Increasingly evidences have demonstrated that miRNAs play significant roles in many
important biological processes, such as cell growth17 , cellular signaling18 , tissue
development19 and disease process20. Although only approximately 2000 miRNAs
exist in humans, they regulate 30% of all genes. miRNAs have been identified to play
a crucial role in various human disease, especially in cancers. Therefore, targeting
miRNAs with drugs will provide a new type of therapy for complex diseases21 and a
new direction for drug repositioning. However, few computational researches predict
drug-disease relationships based on miRNA data. Moreover, many genes with
tissue-specific expression and function are expected to underlie many human
diseases22,23.
Therefore, in this study, we propose a new method based on miRNA data and tissue
specificity of diseases, named as miTS, to predict potential drugs for diseases. The
framework of miTS is shown in Figure 1. Firstly, we download miRNA expression
data of diseases from TCGA24, miRNA-target gene relationship data from three
experimentally validated databases: miRecords25, miRTarbase26 and TarBase27, and
the drug-target gene data from Drugbank28 and KEGG29. Secondly, we select
differentially expressed miRNAs of diseases based on a threshold and preprocess the
target information of FDA approved drugs. Thirdly, we evaluate the relationships
between miRNAs and drugs in the tissue-specific PPI network. And then, we
construct a tripartite network: drug-miRNA-disease. Finally, we obtain the potential
drug-disease associations based on the tripartite network. In this paper, we take breast
cancer as case study and evaluate the results from CTD benchmark, clinical records,
literature mining, KEGG pathways enrichment analysis and overlapping genes
between enriched pathways. In the top-30 drugs, we find 5 new drugs for breast
cancer. In particular, Regorafenib (DB08896) has 15 overlapping KEGG pathways
with breast cancer and their p-values are all very small. In addition, whether in the
literature curation or clinical validation, Regorafenib has a strong correlation with
Figure 1. The framework of our method miTS. (A) Data preparation: miRNA expression data of breast
cancer got from TCGA, miRNA-target gene data got from miRecords, miRTarbase and TarBase, and
drug-target gene data got from Drugbank and KEGG. (B) Data preprocessing: we use Z-score to obtain
the differentially expressed miRNAs for diseases and preprocess the target information of drugs. (C) In
the tissue-specific PPI network, the targets of drug and miRNA are mapped to the PPI network. Orange
nodes represent the target genes of miRNAs. Purple nodes represent the target genes of drugs. Green
nodes represent the background genes. (D) Based on the module distance algorithm, we construct a
drug-miRNA-disease tripartite network, and then based on the tripartite network, we get potential drugs
for diseases. dA,B represents the association score between a drug and a disease.
breast cancer. All the facts show that Regorafenib is likely to be a truly effective drug,
worthy of our further study.
Data and Method
Data
Drug-target data: FDA-approved drugs of human and their corresponding targets are
downloaded from KEGG database and Drugbank. We merge the two datasets and get
1,732 drugs, 1,714 targets and 12,361 drug-target pairs.
miRNA-target data: The target genes of miRNAs are downloaded from miRecords,
miRTarbase, and TarBase databases. We merge the three datasets and get 340
miRNAs, 2,028 targets and 3,652 miRNA-target pairs.
miRNA-disease data: The miRNA-disease curated relationships are downloaded
from HMDD (the Human microRNA Disease Database)30. HMDD presents more
detailed and comprehensive annotations to the human miRNA-disease association
data, including miRNA-disease association data from the evidence of genetics,
epigenetics, circulating miRNAs, and miRNA-target interactions. Finally, we get 578
miRNAs, 383 diseases and 6,448 miRNA-disease relationships.
miRNA expression data: Taking breast cancer as case study, we download the
miRNAs expression data related with breast cancer from TCGA and get a matrix of
503 rows and 1,189 columns, row representing miRNA, column representing cancer
sample, and the values in the matrix representing the RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase per
Million mapped reads) for the miRNAs. We take the mean value of the RPKM values
for 1,189 samples as the final value.
Disease-gene data: The genes related with breast cancer are downloaded from
OMIM31 database.
Tissue-specific
PPI
Interaction
network:
We
download
the
mammary
tissue-specific PPI network marked as “Top Edges” from GIANT (Genome-scale
Integrated Analysis of gene Networks in Tissues) database32 (http://giant.princeton.edu/)
(2017 version). GIANT proposes a tissue-specific benchmark to automatically
up-weight datasets relevant to a tissue from a large data of different tissues and
cell-types. Finally, we get 15,269 proteins and 883,071 protein-protein interactions.
The weights on the edges are proportional to the relationships between nodes. In order
to apply module distance algorithm33 to calculate the relationships between drugs and
miRNAs, we use the Gaussian kernel e w
2
to transfer protein-protein closeness w
to protein-protein distance w , as shown in formula (1).
2
w ' ew
(1)
Method
Screening differentially expressed miRNAs
In order to obtain the differentially expressed miRNAs of breast cancer, we first filter
the miRNAs expression data downloaded from TCGA. For a miRNA r , we use
formula (2) to calculate its Z - score .
Z - score =
R - mean(r )
(r )
(2)
Where R is the RPKM value of miRNA r ; mean (r ) and (r ) represent mean
value and standard deviation of r , respectively. Then we choose Z - score =1.645
(p-value = 0.05) as threshold to screen differentially expressed miRNAs. Finally, we
get a total of 40 differentially expressed miRNAs of breast cancer (see Table 1). In
Table 1, the miRNAs marked by “*” represent they have connections with breast
cancer in HMDD. We find 34 of 40 (85%) differentially expressed miRNAs are
related with breast cancer, which indicates that miRNAs associated with breast cancer
tend to be highly expressed in breast cancer patients. Then, we choose the 34 miRNAs
marked by “*” in Table 1 for further study.
Table 1. Differentially expressed miRNAs of breast cancer
miRNA name
Z-score
miRNA name
Z-score
hsa-mir-21*
hsa-mir-22*
miRNA name
Z-score
3.32
hsa-mir-375*
2.94
hsa-mir-101-1*
2.32
hsa-mir-23a*
1.91
2.29
hsa-mir-199a-2*
1.90
hsa-mir-10b*
2.93
hsa-mir-200c*
2.28
hsa-mir-126*
1.90
hsa-mir-30a*
2.85
hsa-mir-25*
2.27
hsa-mir-100*
1.86
hsa-mir-148a*
2.77
hsa-let-7a-3*
2.21
hsa-let-7c*
1.79
hsa-mir-99b
2.73
hsa-let-7a-1*
2.21
hsa-mir-151
1.78
hsa-mir-143*
2.73
hsa-mir-30d*
2.19
hsa-mir-199a-1*
1.73
hsa-mir-182*
2.72
hsa-mir-92a-2*
2.18
hsa-mir-26a-2*
1.72
hsa-let-7b*
2.61
hsa-let-7f-2*
2.12
hsa-mir-142
1.72
hsa-mir-10a*
2.56
hsa-mir-93*
2.03
hsa-mir-29c*
1.70
hsa-mir-103-1
2.50
hsa-mir-29a*
2.03
hsa-mir-181a-1*
1.69
hsa-let-7a-2*
2.44
hsa-mir-28
2.00
hsa-mir-141*
1.66
hsa-mir-30e
2.38
hsa-mir-199b*
1.98
hsa-mir-183*
2.37
hsa-mir-203*
1.94
The miRNAs marked by “*” represent they have relationship with breast cancer in HMDD.
Construct drug-miRNA-disease tripartite network
The relationship between a miRNA and a drug is derived by measuring the correlation
between their target sets. Because miRNA target genes, drug target genes and
protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks remain largely incomplete, we calculate the
distance between two modules based on the shortest path in incomplete networks33.
Figure 2 gives an example to calculate the distance between miRNA A and drug B in a
weighted tissue-specific PPI network. As shown in Figure 2, miRNA A has three
target genes, marked as a, b, c and drug B has four targets, marked as c, d, e, f. For the
node a, its distance to targets {c, d, e, f} of drug B are 0.8, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.9
respectively, so its shortest distance to drug B is 0.8. In this way, we can obtain the
distances between each node in gene set {a, b, c} and drug B, and the distances
between each node in target set {c, d, e, f} and miRNA A, shown in Figure 2. Finally,
the distance between miRNA A and drug B, dA,B , is equals to the sum of all the
distances divided by the total number of nodes related to miRNA A and drug B. Here,
the total number is 7.
Figure 2. An example for calculating the distance between target set of miRNA A and target set of drug
B. Orange and purple nodes represent genes related to miRNA A and drug B, respectively. Node c is a
shared node, so it is marked by two colors.
Through the above calculation process, we get 1,017 drugs, 25 miRNAs and 25,425
drug-miRNA relationships. Combining the drug-miRNA relations with the
miRNA-breast cancer information, we construct a drug-miRNA-breast cancer
tripartite network.
Predicting potential drugs for breast cancer
Based on the drug-miRNA-breast cancer tripartite network, we predicting potential
drugs for breast cancer. If a drug and breast cancer have common miRNA neighbors,
there will be a connection between them. Finally, there are 25 common miRNAs
between drugs and breast cancer. We use formula (3) to calculate the average distance
between the 25 miRNAs related to breast cancer and drugs as the drug-breast cancer
relationship distance score, d A, B .
n
d A, B
d
i 1
Ai , B
'
n
(3)
Where d Ai , B ' represents the distance between the i -th miRNA of disease A and the
drug B ; n represents the number of miRNAs corresponding to disease A . Here, A =
breast cancer and n = 25.
In order to make the drug-disease distances be proportional to their direct correlations,
we use formula (4) to normalize d A, B as S A, B :
S A, B
Maxd d A, B
Maxd Mind
(4)
Where Maxd and Mind represent the maximum and the minimum of all the
drug-disease distances, respectively; d A, B represents the distance between disease A
and drug B; S A, B represents the direct association between disease A and drug B.
Results
CTD benchmark verification
In our study, we choose breast cancer as case, the drug-breast cancer associations are
ranked in descending order according to their scores. In order to verify the accuracy
of our results, we use the drug-breast cancer relationships data in Comparative
Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)34 as benchmark. As shown in Figure 3, we give the
precision curves of predicted drug-breast cancer relationship results. For each given
threshold, the precision of our method is calculated by formula (5).
precision=
PCTD
P
(5)
Where P represents the number of predicted drug-disease pairs; PCTD represents
the number of drug-disease pairs, which can be found in CTD database.
In Figure 3, we give the precision curves of predicted drug-breast cancer pairs at
different top-x%. From the figure, we find the higher the associations ranking, the
higher the accuracy. Hence, for the breast cancer, we choose top 30 drugs for further
analysis. The top 30 drugs related to breast cancer are shown in Table 2. We validate
the 30 drugs by CTD database and find 11 (36.7%) of them are marked as
“therapeutic (T)”, which means that they have a highly correlation with breast cancer.
In addition, we find 14 of the rest 19 drugs also have connections with breast cancer
in CTD database with inference score over 0 and they are marked as “Ref” in Table 2.
That is to say, there are 83.3% (25/30) drugs can be found in the CTD database and
we predict five potential drugs for breast cancer (DB08871, DB00031, DB08813,
DB08896, and DB06813, marked as boldface in Table 2).
Figure 3. The precision of our predictions at different top-x% drug-breast cancer pairs.
Clinical evaluation
For the five predicted drugs, we further analyze them based on the ClinicalTrials.gov
(https://clinicaltrials.gov/). ClinicalTrials.gov is a registry and results database of
publicly and privately supported clinical studies of human participants conducted
around the world. Currently, it lists 242,537 studies with locations in all 50 states and
in 198 countries (April 25, 2017). From the ClinicalTrials.gov, we can find 84 records
for drug Eribulin mesylate (DB08871) treat breast cancer. For example, “Eribulin
Mesylate Phase IV Clinical Trial in Korean Patients with Metastatic or Locally
Advanced Breast Cancer (ESKIMO) (NCT01961544)”, the purpose is assessing the
safety of Eribulin which is approved for the treatment of the patients in Korea with
locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer; “Eribulin with Trastuzumab as First-line
Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
Table 2. The top 30 drugs related to breast cancer
Rank
Drugbank ID
Drug name
Marker
Inference Score
Similarity Score
1
DB08818
Hyaluronic acid
Ref
61.1
1.00000
2
DB00570
Vinblastine
T
40.6
0.97977
3
DB00642
Pemetrexed
T
12.38
0.97666
4
DB01169
Arsenic trioxide
T
212.32
0.96998
5
DB00242
Cladribine
Ref
14.83
0.96343
6
DB04967
Lucanthone
Ref
45.07
0.96120
7
DB09073
Palbociclib
T
53.75
0.96083
8
DB02701
Nicotinamide
Ref
63.26
0.96013
9
DB01005
Hydroxyurea
Ref
32.57
0.95909
10
DB01204
Mitoxantrone
T
25.1
0.95847
11
DB00309
Vindesine sulfate
T
2.54
0.95388
12
DB00361
Vinorelbine
T
4.36
0.95388
13
DB08871
Eribulin
None
None
0.95388
14
DB01394
Colchicine
Ref
50.29
0.95213
15
DB01229
Paclitaxel
T
111.41
0.95050
16
DB01248
Docetaxel
T
72.35
0.95050
17
DB00440
Trimethoprim
Ref
6.82
0.94971
18
DB01179
Podofilox
Ref
2.87
0.94918
19
DB05260
Gallium nitrate
Ref
19.88
0.94671
20
DB00441
Gemcitabine
T
112.67
0.94582
21
DB00031
Tenecteplase
None
None
0.94357
22
DB08813
Nadroparin
None
None
0.94325
23
DB00432
Trifluridine
Ref
12.49
0.94205
24
DB01073
Fludarabine
Ref
59.43
0.94184
25
DB00694
Daunorubicin
Ref
85.05
0.94044
26
DB00970
Dactinomycin
Ref
98.94
0.93988
27
DB08896
Regorafenib
None
None
0.93853
28
DB06813
Pralatrexate
None
None
0.93853
29
DB00563
Methotrexate
T
123.36
0.93799
30
DB00615
Rifabutin
Ref
2.89
0.93433
Ranked by drug-breast cancer similarity score. Marker has three values: T(therapeutic), Ref (inferred by genes) and None (no
record in CTD database). Inference Score represents the score for the inference based on the topology of the network consisting
of the chemical, disease, and one or more genes used to make the inference.
(NCT01269346)”, the purpose is evaluating the safety and efficacy of Eribulin
mesylate in combination with trastuzumab as first line treatment in female subjects
with locally recurrent or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)
positive breast cancer; “Eribulin Mesylate in Treating Patients with Previously
Treated Metastatic Breast Cancer (NCT01908101)”, and so on. For drug Nadroparin
(DB08813),
we
find
one
record:
“Prevention
of
Venous
and
Arterial
Thromboembolism, in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy, With a Low
Molecular Weight Heparin (Nadroparin Calcium) (NCT00951574)”, 1200 patients
with lung, breast, gastrointestinal (stomach, colon-rectum, pancreas), ovarian or head
and neck cancer undergoing chemotherapy will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio
and in double-blind conditions to a treatment with subcutaneous low molecular
weight heparin (nadroparin calcium, one injection/day) or placebo for the overall
duration of chemotherapy or up to a maximum of 4 months. For drug Regorafenib
(DB08896), we find three records related with breast cancer, “Refametinib in
Combination with Regorafenib in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Cancer
(NCT02168777)”, “Effect of Regorafenib on Digoxin and Rosuvastatin in Patients
with Advanced Solid Malignant Tumors (NCT02106845)”, and so on. For drug
Pralatrexate (DB06813), we find a clinical study of Pralatrexate in 22 female patients
with previously-treated breast cancer (NCT01118624). Only one drug, Tenecteplase
(DB00031) was not found in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Literature curation
In the above section, the top 30 drugs related with breast cancer are validated by CTD
database and Clinical database. After our analysis, we obtain five potential drugs
(Eribulin mesylate, Tenecteplase, Nadroparin, Regorafenib, Pralatrexate) for breast
cancer. In ClinicalTrials.gov database, only one drug, Tenecteplase, cannot be found
its corresponding record. In this section, we will analyze the five potential drugs for
breast cancer by literature mining.
Eribulin mesylate (DB08871) is an anticancer drug marketed by Eisai Co. under the
trade name Halaven, which was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) on November 15, 2010, to treat patients with metastatic breast cancer35. In
2016, Kurebayashi J et al. investigated the combined effects of Eribulin and
antiestrogens. They used a panel of eight breast cancer cell lines, including five
estrogen receptors (ER)-positive and three ER-negative cell lines. The results of this
study demonstrate that Eribulin had potent antitumor effects on estrogen-stimulated
ER-positive breast cancer cells36.
Nadroparin (DB08813) is an anticoagulant belonging to a class of drugs called low
molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), which is used in general and orthopedic
surgery to prevent thromboembolic disorders. In 2015, Sun Y et al.37 used the MTT
test to observe the effect of different concentrations of nadroparin on the growth
capacity of breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231. The purpose was to study the effect of
nadroparin in the migration of breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 and its action
mechanism. The results show that nadroparin can inhibit the growth capacity of breast
cancer cells MDA-MB-231 and the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells
MDA-MB-231. Its mechanism is to down-regulate MMP-2 and MMP-9 expressions
after combining with Integrin β3.
Regorafenib (DB08896) is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor developed by Bayer which
targets angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK).
Regorafenib has been demonstrated to increase the overall survival of patients with
metastatic colorectal cancer38. Stalker L et al. using regorafenib in mammary tumor
cell lines, the results show regorafenib may prove clinically useful in inhibiting breast
cancer cell migration and metastasis39. Su J C et al. investigated the potential of
regorafenib to suppress metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells
through targeting SHP-1/p-STAT3/VEGF-A axis and found a significant correlation
between cancer cell migration and SHP-1/p-STAT3/VEGF-A expression in human
TNBC cells40.
Pralatrexate (DB06813) is an anti-cancer drug. It is the first drug approved as a
treatment for patients with relapsed T-cell lymphoma 41 . Pralatrexate results in
increased activity of CASP3 protein, which has been found to be necessary for normal
brain development as well as its typical role in apoptosis, where it is responsible for
chromatin condensation and DNA fragmentation42.
Tenecteplase (DB00031) is a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) produced by
recombinant DNA technology using an established mammalian cell line and used as a
thrombolytic drug. Nielsen VG et al.43 to study whether tissue-type plasminogen
activator (tPA) in plasma obtained from patients with breast cancer, lung cancer,
pancreatic cancer and colon cancer is less than that obtained from normal individuals.
The results show that tissue-type plasminogen activator-induced fibrinolysis in breast
cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and colon cancer patients is enhanced.
Sumiyoshi K et al.44 found that the increase in levels of plasminogen activator and
type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor in human breast cancer may play a role in
tumor progression and metastasis. Although we have not found the relationship
between tenecteplase (DB00031) and breast cancer through the literatures, the drug
had the similar effects as nadroparin45. Therefore, we infer that tenecteplase is likely
to have effect on breast cancer.
KEGG pathway functional enrichment analysis
In this section, we will further make KEGG pathway enrichment analysis on five
potential drugs and their associated disease. KEGG (http://www.kegg.jp/ or
http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) is an encyclopedia of genes and genomes46. Its primary
goal is to assign functional meanings to genes and genomes both at the molecular and
higher levels. Thus, drugs or diseases can be associated with certain pathways through
their related genes. If a drug has overlapping KEGG pathways with a disease, the drug
and the disease may have great relevance. That is, the drug may treat or cause the
disease by acting on the overlapping pathways.
We use DAVID 47 , 48 functional annotation tool for KEGG pathway enrichment
analysis. DAVID provides a comprehensive set of functional annotation tools for
investigators to understand biological significance of a large number of genes. For
any given gene list, DAVID is able to visualize genes on BioCarta & KEGG pathway
maps, identify enriched biological themes, especially GO terms, and so on. Therefore,
we use DAVID to identify overlapping KEGG pathways between potential drugs and
breast cancer. The p-value is set to be less than 0.05.
We find Nadroparin and Regorafenib have 4 and 15 overlapping KEGG pathways
with breast cancer, respectively. The details are shown in Table 3. From Table 3, we
can find their corresponding p-values are very small.
Although the drug Eribulin mesylate has not overlapping functional pathways with
the breast cancer at present, it can be enriched to “hsa04540: Gap junction”. In fact,
protein connexin 43 (Cx43), a part of intercellular gap junctions, is frequently
down-regulated in tumors 49 . Studies have demonstrated that gap junctions (GJs)
composed of connexin (Cx) proteins have the potential to modulate drug
chemosensitivity in multiple tumor cells50.
Table 3. Overlapping KEGG pathways between potential drugs and breast cancer
Drug Name
Nadroparin
Regorafenib
Overlapping enriched pathways
p-value
hsa05210: Colorectal cancer
0.00897
hsa05161: Hepatitis B
0.02098
hsa05166: HTLV-I infection
0.03704
hsa05200: Pathways in cancer
0.04687
hsa04015: Rap1 signaling pathway
3.41E-14
hsa04014: Ras signaling pathway
7.18E-14
hsa04151: PI3K-Akt signaling pathway
3.36E-10
hsa05230: Central carbon metabolism in cancer
4.38E-08
hsa05215: Prostate cancer
2.21E-07
hsa05200: Pathways in cancer
1.13E-06
hsa05218: Melanoma
4.76E-06
hsa05214: Glioma
1.65E-04
hsa05221: Acute myeloid leukemia
0.00404
hsa05205: Proteoglycans in cancer
0.00433
hsa05220: Chronic myeloid leukemia
0.00660
hsa04012: ErbB signaling pathway
0.00952
hsa05206: MicroRNAs in cancer
0.01157
hsa05231: Choline metabolism in cancer
0.01269
hsa04722: Neurotrophin signaling pathway
0.01761
For drug Tenecteplase, we find one function enrichment pathway: “hsa04610:
Complement and coagulation cascades”. In 2016, based on the microarray data of
GSE3467 from Gene Expression Omnibus(GEO) database, Yu J et al.51 identified the
differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between 9 PTC samples and 9 normal controls.
The purpose was predicted key genes and pathways in papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Their results showed that the highly expressed genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma
were mainly enriched on the “hsa04610: Complement and coagulation cascades”
functional pathway. As for Pralatrexate, because it has only two targets: DHFR and
TYMS, it has few related KEGG pathways. That is the main reason that Pralatrexate
has no overlapping KEGG pathways with breast cancer at present.
Overlapping genes between enriched KEGG pathways
To further analyze our results, for Eribulin mesylate, Tenecteplase and Pralatrexate,
we calculate the common genes between enriched pathways of each drug and those of
breast cancer. The more common genes, the stronger relationship between the drug
and disease. The results are shown in Figure 4A-C, respectively. The purple hexagon
nodes represent the enriched pathways of a drug. The light green circular nodes
represent breast cancer enriched pathways. The width of edges represents the number
of common genes between two pathway sets. The wider the edge, the more the
number of common genes. From Figure 4, we can find the three drugs Eribulin
mesylate, Tenecteplase and Pralatrexate all have strong connection with breast cancer,
which further imply the three drugs are likely to be the potential treatments of breast
cancer.
A
B
C
Figure 4. The common genes between enriched pathway sets of drugs and breast cancer. The purple
hexagon nodes represent the enriched pathways of a drug. The light green circular nodes represent
breast cancer enriched pathways. The width of edges represents the number of common genes between
two pathway sets. The wider the edge, the more the number of common genes. (A) The common genes
between enriched pathway sets of Eribulin mesylate and breast cancer. (B) The common genes between
enriched pathway sets of Tenecteplase and breast cancer. (C) The common genes between enriched
pathway sets of Pralatrexate and breast cancer.
Discussions and conclusions
At present, “undruggable” proteins can be targeted via their miRNA gene regulators,
enabling the treatment of diseases that seem impossible to cure. Human diseases
result from the disordered interplay of tissue- and cell lineage–specific processes.
Therefore, here we propose a new method miTS to predict new indications of drugs
based on miRNA data and the tissue specificities of diseases. Taking breast cancer as
case study, we predict five potential drugs and analyze them from five aspects: CTD
benchmark, clinical records, literature curation, KEGG pathway functional
enrichment analysis and overlapping genes between enriched KEGG pathways. We
find for the five new drugs, they are supported at least in three ways. In particular,
Regorafenib (DB08896) has 15 overlapping KEGG pathways with breast cancer and
their p-values are all very small. In addition, whether in the literature curation or
clinical validation, Regorafenib has a strong correlation with breast cancer. All the
evidence shows Regorafenib is likely to be a truly effective drug, worthy of our
further study. The results have demonstrated the performance of our model and the
feasibility of drug repositioning based on miRNA data and tissue specificity.
Due to the incompleteness of data, there may be some biases in our method. With the
continuous improvement of data, our method miTS will find more effective drugs for
disease treatment. All in all, our research reveals a promising perspective to predict
drug-disease relationships and seeks new opportunities for drug repositioning.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Nos. 61672406, 61532014, 91530113,61502363 and 61402349), the Natural Science
Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Nos. 2016JQ6057, 2015JM6283).
Reference
[1] Adams C P, Brantner V V. Estimating the cost of new drug development: is it
really $802 million? [J]. Health affairs, 2006, 25(2): 420-428.
[2] Ashburn T T, Thor K B. Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses
for existing drugs[J]. Nature reviews Drug discovery, 2004, 3(8): 673-683.
[3] Novac N. Challenges and opportunities of drug repositioning[J]. Trends in
pharmacological sciences, 2013, 34(5): 267-272.
[4] Hopkins A L. Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery[J].
Nature chemical biology, 2008, 4(11): 682-690.
[5] Wang Y, Zhang X S, Chen L. Modelling biological systems from molecules to
dynamical networks[J]. BMC systems biology, 2012, 6(1): S1.
[6] Barabasi A L, Oltvai Z N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional
organization[J]. Nature reviews genetics, 2004, 5(2): 101-113.
[7] Cheng F, Liu C, Jiang J, et al. Prediction of drug-target interactions and drug
repositioning via network-based inference[J]. PLoS Comput Biol, 2012, 8(5):
e1002503.
[8] Chen X, Liu M X, Yan G Y. Drug–target interaction prediction by random walk
on the heterogeneous network[J]. Molecular BioSystems, 2012, 8(7): 1970-1978.
[9] Yeh S H, Yeh H Y, Soo V W. A network flow approach to predict drug targets
from microarray data, disease genes and interactome network-case study on
prostate cancer[J]. Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2012, 2(1): 1.
[10] Bose D, Jayaraj G, Suryawanshi H, et al. The Tuberculosis Drug Streptomycin as
a Potential Cancer Therapeutic: Inhibition of miR‐21 Function by Directly
Targeting Its Precursor[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012, 51(4):
1019-1023.
[11] Xu S. miRNAs as Novel Therapeutic Targets and Diagnostic Biomarkers for
Parkinsons Disease: U.S. Patent Application 14/416,932[P]. 2013-7-24.
[12] Liu Z, Sall A, Yang D. MicroRNA: an emerging therapeutic target and
intervention tool[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2008, 9(6):
978-999.
[13] Srinivasan S, Selvan S T, Archunan G, et al. MicroRNAs: the next generation
therapeutic targets in human diseases[J]. 2013.
[14] Lanford R E, Hildebrandt-Eriksen E S, Petri A, et al. Therapeutic silencing of
microRNA-122 in primates with chronic hepatitis C virus infection[J]. Science,
2010, 327(5962): 198-201.
[15] Rhodes L V, Nitschke A M, Segar H C, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor
trichostatin A alters microRNA expression profiles in apoptosis-resistant breast
cancer cells[J]. Oncology reports, 2012, 27(1): 10.
[16] Bartel D P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function[J]. cell,
2004, 116(2): 281-297.
[17] Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack F J. Oncomirs—microRNAs with a role in cancer[J].
Nature Reviews Cancer, 2006, 6(4): 259-269.
[18] Cui Q, Yu Z, Purisima E O, et al. Principles of microRNA regulation of a human
cellular signaling network[J]. Molecular systems biology, 2006, 2(1): 46.
[19] Krichevsky A M, King K S, Donahue C P, et al. A microRNA array reveals
extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development[J]. Rna, 2003,
9(10): 1274-1281.
[20] Calin G A, Croce C M. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers[J]. Nature
reviews cancer, 2006, 6(11): 857-866.
[21] Zhang S, Chen L, Jung E J, et al. Targeting microRNAs with small molecules:
Between Dream and Reality[J]. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2010,
87(6): 754.
[22] Cai, J.J. & Petrov, D.A. Relaxed purifying selection and possibly high rate of
adaptation in primate lineage-specific genes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 393–409 (2010).
[23] Winter, E.E., Goodstadt, L. & Ponting, C.P. Elevated rates of protein secretion,
evolution, and disease among tissue-specific genes. Genome Res. 14, 54–61 (2004).
[24] Weinstein J N, Collisson E A, Mills G B, et al. The cancer genome atlas
pan-cancer analysis project[J]. Nature genetics, 2013, 45(10): 1113-1120.
[25] Xiao F, Zuo Z, Cai G, et al. miRecords: an integrated resource for
microRNA–target interactions[J]. Nucleic acids research, 2009, 37(suppl 1):
D105-D110.
[26] Chou C H, Chang N W, Shrestha S, et al. miRTarBase 2016: updates to the
experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions database[J]. Nucleic acids
research, 2016, 44(D1): D239-D247.
[27] Vlachos I S, Paraskevopoulou M D, Karagkouni D, et al. DIANA-TarBase v7. 0:
indexing more than half a million experimentally supported miRNA: mRNA
interactions[J]. Nucleic acids research, 2015, 43(D1): D153-D159.
[28] Wishart D S, Knox C, Guo A C, et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for
in silico drug discovery and exploration[J]. Nucleic acids research, 2006, 34(suppl 1):
D668-D672.
[29] Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes[J].
Nucleic acids research, 2000, 28(1): 27-30.
[30] Li Y, Qiu C, Tu J, et al. HMDD v2. 0: a database for experimentally supported
human microRNA and disease associations[J]. Nucleic acids research, 2013: gkt1023.
[31] Hamosh A, Scott A F, Amberger J S, et al. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man
(OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders[J]. Nucleic acids
research, 2005, 33(suppl 1): D514-D517.
[32] Greene C S, Krishnan A, Wong A K, et al. Understanding multicellular function
and disease with human tissue-specific networks[J]. Nature genetics, 2015, 47(6):
569-576.
[33] Menche J, Sharma A, Kitsak M, Ghiassian S, Vidal M, Loscalzo J, et
al.Uncovering disease?disease relationships through the incompleteinteractome.
Science 2015;347(6224):1257601.
[34] Davis A P, Grondin C J, Lennon-Hopkins K, et al. The Comparative
Toxicogenomics Database's 10th year anniversary: update 2015[J]. Nucleic acids
research, 2015, 43(D1): D914-D920.
[35] US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves new treatment option for
late-stage breast cancer[J]. Press release, 2013.
[36] Kurebayashi J, Kanomata N, Yamashita T, et al. Antitumor and anticancer stem
cell activities of eribulin mesylate and antiestrogens in breast cancer cells[J]. Breast
Cancer, 2016, 23(3): 425-436.
[37] Sun Y, Gu J. Study on effect of naringenin in inhibiting migration and invasion of
breast cancer cells and its molecular mechanism[J]. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi.
2015, 40(6): 1144-1150.
[38] Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A F, Siena S, et al. Phase III CORRECT trial of
regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)[J]. 2012.
[39] Stalker L, Pemberton J, Moorehead R A. Inhibition of proliferation and migration
of luminal and claudin-low breast cancer cells by PDGFR inhibitors[J]. Cancer cell
international, 2014, 14(1): 89.
[40] Su J C, Mar A C, Wu S H, et al. Disrupting VEGF-A paracrine and autocrine
loops by targeting SHP-1 suppresses triple negative breast cancer metastasis[J].
Scientific Reports, 2016, 6.
[41] O'connor O A. Pralatrexate: an emerging new agent with activity in T-cell
lymphomas[J]. Current opinion in oncology, 2006, 18(6): 591-597.
[42] Porter A G, Jänicke R U. Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis[J]. Cell death
and differentiation, 1999, 6(2): 99-104.
[43] Nielsen V G, Matika R W, Ley M L B, et al. Tissue-type plasminogen
activator-induced fibrinolysis is enhanced in patients with breast, lung, pancreas and
colon cancer[J]. Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 2014, 25(3): 248-253.
[44] Sumiyoshi K, Baba S, Sakaguchi S, et al. Increase in levels of plasminogen
activator and type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor in human breast cancer: possible
roles in tumor progression and metastasis[J]. Thrombosis research, 1991, 63(1):
59-71.
[45] De Luca G, Marino P. Adjunctive benefits from low-molecular-weight heparins
as compared to unfractionated heparin among patients with ST-segment elevation
myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. A meta-analysis of the randomized
trials[J]. American heart journal, 2007, 154(6): 1085. e1-1085. e6.
[46] Minoru Kanehisa1, Miho Furumichi1 Mao Tanabe, Yoko Sato and Kanae
Morishima. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs.
Nucl. Acids Res. (2016) doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092.
[47] Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA.Systematic and integrative analysis of
large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources.Nature Protocols2008, 4: 44.
[48] Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths
toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids
Research2009,37:1-13.
[49] Radić J, Krušlin B, Šamija M, et al. Connexin 43 Expression in
PrimaryColorectal Carcinomas in Patients with Stage III and IV Disease[J].
Anticancer research, 2016, 36(5): 2189-2196.
[50] Yang Y, Zhu J, Zhang N, et al. Impaired gap junctions in human hepatocellular
carcinoma limit intrinsic oxaliplatin chemosensitivity: A key role of connexin 26[J].
International journal of oncology, 2016, 48(2): 703-713.
[51] Yu J, Mai W, Cui Y, et al. Key genes and pathways predicted in papillary thyroid
carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis[J]. Journal of endocrinological
investigation, 2016, 39(11): 1285-1293.
| 5cs.CE
|
A Quadratic Assignment Formulation
of the Graph Edit Distance
Sébastien Bougleux1,4 , Luc Brun1,4 , Vincenzo Carletti1,2 , Pasquale Foggia2 ,
Benoit Gaüzère3,4 , and Mario Vento2
arXiv:1512.07494v1 [cs.DS] 23 Dec 2015
2 MVIA,
1 GREYC UMR 6072, CNRS - Université de Caen Normandie - ENSICAEN, France
Dept. of Information, Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Univ. of Salerno, Italy
3 LITIS, INSA de Rouen, France
4 NormaSTIC FR CNRS 3638, France
January 15, 2018
Abstract
Computing efficiently a robust measure of similarity or dissimilarity between graphs
is a major challenge in Pattern Recognition. The Graph Edit Distance (GED) is a
flexible measure of dissimilarity between graphs which arises in error-tolerant graph
matching. It is defined from an optimal sequence of edit operations (edit path) transforming one graph into an other. Unfortunately, the exact computation of this measure is NP-hard. In the last decade, several approaches have been proposed to approximate the GED in polynomial time, mainly by solving linear programming problems.
Among them, the bipartite GED has received much attention. It is deduced from a linear sum assignment of the nodes of the two graphs, which can be efficiently computed
by Hungarian-type algorithms. However, edit operations on nodes and edges are not
handled simultaneously, which limits the accuracy of the approximation. To overcome
this limitation, we propose to extend the linear assignment model to a quadratic one,
for directed or undirected graphs having labelized nodes and edges. This is realized
through the definition of a family of edit paths induced by assignments between nodes.
We formally show that the GED, restricted to the paths in this family, is equivalent
to a quadratic assignment problem. Since this problem is NP-hard, we propose to
compute an approximate solution by an adaptation of the Integer Projected Fixed
Point method. Experiments show that the proposed approach is generally able to
reach a more accurate approximation of the optimal GED than the bipartite GED,
with a computational cost that is still affordable for graphs of non trivial sizes.
1
Introduction
The definition of efficient similarity or dissimilarity measures between graphs is a key
problem in structural pattern recognition [6, 9, 36]. This problem is nicely addressed
by the graph edit distance, which constitutes one of the most flexible graph dissimilarity
measure [35, 3, 32, 2]. Given two graphs G1 and G2 , such a distance may be understood as a
measure of the minimal amount of distortion required to transform G1 into G2 . The graph
edit distance is defined from the notion of edit path which corresponds to a sequence of
elementary transformations of a graph into another. An edit operation is a transformation
performed on the structure of a graph, here restricted to be elementary: node or edge
insertion, removal and substitution. This is illustrated in Fig. 1. Edit operations are
penalized by a real non-negative cost function ce (.), and the cost of the edit path is defined
as the sum of all its elementary operation’s costs. An optimal edit path, transforming a
graph G1 = (V1 , E1 ) into a graph G2 = (V2 , E2 ), have a minimal cost among all edit paths
from G1 to G2 . Its cost defines the GED from G1 to G2 :
GED(G1 , G2 ) =
min
(e1 ,...,ek )∈P(G1 ,G2 )
k
X
ce (ei ).
i=1
1
(1)
a
a
G1
d
d
b
b
c
c
G1
G2
a
e
a
add-edge(d,c)
d
b
d
c
b
c
del-edge(b,c)
a
d
a
add-node(e)
b
c
d
e
b
c
add-edge(b,e)
a
a
G2
add-edge(c,e)
d
d
b
c
b
c
e
e
Figure 1: A possible edit path to transform the graph G1 into the graph G2 . If we assume
that all the edit operation have an unitary cost, the overall cost of the transformation is
equal to 5.
where P(G1 , G2 ) is the set of all edit paths from G1 to G2 , and ei is an edit operation. In
this paper, graphs are assumed to be simple and labeled.
Computing the GED is NP-hard, in fact NP-complete, and its approximation is APXhard [21]. A common approach consists in representing the problem into a state space where
the optimal solution can be found using for example the A∗ algorithm, in exponential time
complexity. This is thus restricted to small graphs composed of about 10 nodes. Such a
complexity compromises the suitability of the GED in many practical applications where
the graphs are usually one order of magnitude bigger. However, most of real world problems
do not require the computation of the exact GED, and the use of an approximation is
often sufficient. For this reason, the interest of the scientific community has been focused
on methods providing efficient approximations of the GED, mainly linear and suboptimal
ones.
In [15], the GED is modeled as a binary linear programming problem for graphs with
labeled nodes and unlabeled edges. The relaxation of the initial problem provides a lower
bound of the GED which however cannot be readily associated to an edit path. An upper
bound is also provided through an approximation of the binary program. The resulting
problem corresponds to a square linear sum assignment problem (LSAP), i.e. a weighted
2
bipartite graph matching, such that the nodes of graph G1 can be removed, substituted
to the nodes of graph G2 , as well as the nodes of G2 can be inserted. A node assignment
incorporating possible removals and insertions is then defined as a bijective mapping, thus
representing a set of edit operations on nodes. Each edit operation is penalized by a cost.
The cost of an assignment is then defined as the sum of the costs of its corresponding edit
operations on nodes. The LSAP consists in selecting an assignment having a minimal cost,
which can be computed in polynomial time complexity, for instance with the Hungarian
algorithm, see [34, 4] for more details on linear programming and LSAP. The resulting
optimal node assignment allows to deduce, in a non ambiguous way, the edge operations
that define an edit path, mostly not minimal but short. The cost of such a short path
defines an approximate GED.
The same line of research has been followed in [31, 26], but such that labels of edges
are also taken into account in the assignment through the cost of edit operations on nodes,
which is neglected in the upper bound proposed in [15]. The resulting distance, called
the bipartite GED, has received much attention [37, 7, 33, 10, 29, 28, 27, 30, 8, 5]. In
order to select a relevant assignment, a bag of patterns is attached to each node, and each
possible substitution is penalized by a cost that measures the affinity between the bags,
hence taking into account the edge information. Similarly, node removals and insertions
are penalized by a cost measuring the importance of the bags.
The definition of the bags of patterns is a key point, as well as the associated measure
of affinity. Incident edges have been initially proposed in [31, 26], and the cost between two
nodes (or bags) is itself defined as the cost of the linear sum assignment of the patterns
within the bags, following the same framework as the one defined for the nodes. The cost of
substituting, removing and inserting the patterns depends on the original edit cost function
ce . The resulting optimal node assignment allows to deduce, in a non ambiguous way, the
edge operations that define an edit path, mostly not minimal but short. The cost of such
a short path defines the bipartite GED.
Remark that this approach assumes that an edit path may be deduced from a sequence
of edit operations applied on nodes only. As we will see in this paper, this is possible because
there is an equivalence relation between assignments and edit paths. Intuitively, this is due
to the strong relationship that exists between GED and morphism between graphs. Under
special conditions on the cost of edit operations, computing the GED is equivalent to
compute a maximum common subgraph of two graphs [1, 2]. More generally, any mapping
between the nodes of two graphs induces an edit path which substitutes all mapped nodes
together with all their incident edges, and inserts or removes the non-mapped nodes/edges.
Conversely, given an edit path between two graphs, such that each node and each edge is
substituted only once, one can define a mapping between the substituted nodes and edges
of both graphs.
While the bipartite GED provides a good approximation of the GED, it overestimates
it. As shown by several works, this overestimation can only be marginally reduced, for
instance by considering more global information than the one supported by incident edges
[37, 10, 5], or by modifying the resulting edit path by genetic algorithms [29], see [27]
for more details. Although these methods provide an interesting compromise between
time complexity and approximation quality, they are inherently limited to compute linear
approximations of the GED.
To fully describe the GED, both node and edge assignments should be considered simultaneously. Indeed, operations on edges can only be deduced from operations performed
on their two incident nodes. For instance, an edge can be substituted to another one only
if its incident nodes are substituted. This pairwise constraint on nodes is closely related
to the one involved in graph matching. It is known that graph matching problems, and
more generally problems that incorporate pairwise constraints, can be cast as a quadratic
assignment problem (QAP) [16, 18, 19, 23, 4]. QAPs are NP-hard and so different relaxation algorithms have been proposed to find an approximate solution, such as Integer
Projected Fixed Point (IPFP) [20], or Graduated NonConvexity and Concavity Procedure
[22]. Even if computing the GED is generally not equivalent to solving a graph matching
problem, it should also be formalized as a QAP. To the best of our knowledge, this aspect
has only been considered through the definition of fuzzy paths by [25]. Thus, the strong
3
relationships between the GED and the QAP have not yet been analyzed.
In this paper, we extend the LSAP with insertions and removals [31, 26] to a quadratic
one. First, preliminary results concerning edit paths are established (Section 2), allowing
to formalize the relation between the LSAP (Section 3) or the QAP (Section 4), and such
paths. In particular, we show that the GED is a QAP when graphs are simple. Then, we
propose an improved IPFP algorithm adapted to the minimization of quadratic functionals
to approximate the GED (Section 5). The approach, validated through experiments in
Section 6, generally provides a more accurate approximation of the exact GED than the
bipartite GED, with a computational cost still affordable for graphs of non trivial sizes.
2
Preliminaries
This section introduces some basics about graphs, graph edit distance and edit paths. We
futher introduce different familly of edit paths and show that one of this familly is in direct
correspondence with a familly of mapping functions between the set of nodes of two graphs.
2.1
Graph Basics
Definition 1 (Unlabeled graph) An unlabeled graph G is defined by the couple G =
(V, E) where V is the set of nodes and E ⊆ V × V is the set of edges. Each edge is an
orded couple of nodes (i, j) with i, j ∈ V . The direction of an edge is implicitly given by
the order of its nodes, i.e. the direction of (i, j) is from i to j.
Definition 2 (Nodes Adjacency) Given a graph G = (V, E) and two nodes i, j ∈ V . i
and j are said to be adjacent iff ∃(i, j) ∈ E.
Definition 3 (Unlabeled simple graph) An unlabeled graph is said to be simple iff:
1. It exists at most one edge between any pair of nodes,
2. The graph does not contain self loops ((i, i) 6∈ E, ∀i ∈ V )
Definition 4 (Labeled simple graph) Let L be a finite alphabet of node and edge labels.
A labeled simple graph is a tuple G = (V, E, µ, ν) where
• the couple (V, E) defines an unlabeled simple graph,
• µ : V → L is a node labeling function,
• ν : E → L is an edge labeling function.
The unlabeled graph associated to a given labeled graph G = (V, E, µ, ν) is defined by the
couple (V, E).
In the following we will only consider simple graphs that we will simply denote by
unlabeled (resp. labeled) graphs. The term graph will denote indifferently a labeled or an
unlabeled graph.
Definition 5 (Undirected graph)
• A simple graph G = (V, E) is said to be undirected iff
∀(i, j) ∈ E ∃(j, i) ∈ E.
• A labeled simple graph G = (V, E, µ, ν) is said to be undirected iff
∀(i, j) ∈ E ∃(j, i) ∈ E ∧ ν(i, j) = ν(j, i).
Definition 6 (Bipartite graph) A graph G, labeled or not, is said to be bipartite iff
∃V1 , V2 ⊆ V : ∀(i, j) ∈ E, (i ∈ V1 ∧ j ∈ V2 ) ∨ (i ∈ V2 ∧ j ∈ V1 ).
Definition 7 (Subgraph)
4
• An unlabeled graph G1 = (V1 , E1 ) is said to be an unlabeled subgraph of G2 = (V2 , E2 )
if V1 ⊆ V2 and E1 ⊆ E2 ∩ (V1 × V1 ). The unlabeled subgraph G1 is called an unlabeled
proper subgraph if V1 6= V2 or E1 6= E2 .
• If G1 = (V1 , E1 , µ1 , ν1 ) and G2 = (V2 , E2 , µ2 , ν2 ) are both labeled graphs then G1 is a
(proper) subgraph of G2 if (V1 , E1 ) is an unlabeled (proper) subgraph of (V2 , E2 ) and
if the following additional constraint is fulfilled: µ2 |V1 = µ1 and ν2 |E1 = ν1 , where f|
denotes the restriction of function f to a particular domain.
• A structural subgraph of a labeled graph G is an unlabeled subgraph of the unlabeled
graph associated to G.
2.2
Edit operations, paths, and distance
Definition 8 (Elementary edit operations) An elementary edit operation is one of the
following operation applied on a graph:
• Node/Edge removal. Such removals are defined as the removal of the considered
element from sets V or E.
• Node/Edge insertion. On labeled graphs, a vertex/edge insertion also associates a
label to the inserted element.
• Node/Edge substitution if the graph is a labeled one. Such an operation modifies the
label of a node or an edge and thus transforms the node or edge labeling functions.
Definition 9 (Cost of an elementary edit operation) Each elementary operation x
is associated to a cost encoded by a specific function for each type of operation:
• Node (cvd (x)) and edge removal (ced (x))
• Node (cvi (x)) and edge (cei (x)) insertion,
• Node (cvs (x)) and edge (ces (x)) substitution on labeled graphs.
By extension, we will consider that functions cvd and cvi (resp. ced and cei ) apply on the
set of nodes (resp. the set of edges) of a graph. Hence, the cost cvd (v) denotes the cost of
removing node v.
We assume that a substitution transforming one label into the same label has zero cost:
∀l ∈ L, cvs (l → l) = ces (l → l) = 0
where l → l′ denotes the substitution of label l into l′ on some edge or node.
Definition 10 (Edit path) An edit path of a graph G is a sequence of elementary operations applied on G, where node removal and edge insertion have to satisfy the following
constraints:
1. A node removal implies a first removal of all its incident edges,
2. An edge insertion can be applied only between two existing or already inserted nodes.
3. Edge insertions should not create more than one edge between two vertices nor create
self-loops.
An edit path that transforms a graph G1 into a graph G2 is an edit path of G1 whose last
graph is G2 . If G1 and G2 are unlabeled we assume that no node nor edge substitutions
are performed.
Definition 11 (Cost of an edit path) The cost of an edit path P , denoted γ(P ) is the
sum of the costs of its elementary edit operations.
5
Definition 12 (Edit distance) The edit distance from a graph G1 to a graph G2 is defined as the minimal cost of all edit paths from G1 to G2 .
d(G1 , G2 ) =
min
P ∈P(G1 ,G2 )
γ(P )
where P(G1 , G2 ) is the set of all edit paths transforming G1 into G2 . An edit path from
G1 to G2 with a minimal cost is called an optimal path.
Proposition 1 Given any graph G, and any edit path P of G, the transformation of G by
P is still a simple graph.
Proof: Let G = (V, E, µ, ν) and G′ = (V ′ , E ′ , µ′ , ν ′ ) denote the initial graph and its
transformation by P . Since the insertion of nodes and edges induces the definition of their
labels, function µ′ (resp. ν ′ ) defines a valid labeling function over V ′ (resp. E ′ ).
Let us consider (u, v) ∈ E ′ . Vertices u and v should either be present in V or have been
inserted before the insertion of edge (u, v) (Definition 10, condition 2). Moreover, none
of these nodes can be removed after the last insertion of edge (u, v) since such a removal
would imply the removal of (u, v) (Definition 10, condition 1). Both u and v thus belong to
V ′ . Hence E ′ ⊆ V ′ × V ′ . Moreover, according to Definition 10, condition 3 the edge (u, v)
can not be inserted if it already exists in G and u 6= v. It follows that G′ = (V ′ , E ′ , µ′ , ν ′ )
is a labeled simple graph according to Definition 4.
Definition 13 (Independent edit path) An independent edit path between two labeled
graphs G1 and G2 is an edit path such that:
1. No node nor edge is both substituted and removed,
2. No node nor edge is simultaneously substituted and inserted,
3. Any inserted element is never removed,
4. Any node or edge is substituted at most once,
Note that an independent edit path is not minimal in the number of operations. Indeed,
Definition 13 still allows to replace one substitution by one removal followed by one insertion (but such an operation can be performed only once for each node or edge thanks to
condition 3). We however forbid useless operations such as the substitution of one node
followed by its removal (condition 1) or the insertion of a node with a wrong label followed
by its substitution (condition 2).
In the following we will only consider independent edit paths that we simply call edit
paths.
Proposition 2 The elementary operations of an independent edit path between two graphs
G1 and G2 may be ordered into a sequence of removals, followed by a sequence of substitutions and terminated by a sequence of insertions.
Proof: Let R, S and I denote the sub-sequences of Removals, Substitutions and Insertions
of an edit path P , respectively. Since no removal may be performed on a substituted
element (condition 1 of Definition 13) and no removal may be performed on an inserted
element (condition 3), removals only apply on elements which are neither substituted nor
inserted. Such removals operations may thus be grouped at the beginning of the edit
path. Now, since an element cannot be substituted after its insertion, substitutions can
only apply on the remaining elements after the removal step and can be grouped after the
removal operations. The remaining operations only contain insertions.
Let us consider the sequence of elementary operations (R, S, I) the order within sequences R, S and I being deduced from the one of P . Such a sequence may be defined
since operations in R apply on elements not in S and I while operations in S do not apply
on the same elements than operations in I. Such sets are independent, leading to the
definition of independent edit paths. However, we still have to show that the sequence
(R, S, I) defines a valid edit path.
6
1. Since R contains all the removal operations contained in P , if P satisfies condition 1
of Definition 10, so does the sequence R.
2. Let us suppose that an edge insertion is valid in sequence P while it violates Definition 10, condition 2 in sequence (R, S, I). Let us denote by (u, v) such an edge. Edge
(u, v) violates condition 2 in sequence (R, S, I) only if either the removal of u or v
belongs to R. In such a case the insertion of (u, v) in P should be made before the
removal of u or v. But such a removal would imply the removal of all the incident
edges of u or v (Definition 10, condition 1) including the newly inserted edge (u, v).
Such an operation would violate the independence of P (Definition 13, condition 3).
The sequence (R, S, I) is thus a valid edit path which transforms a graph G1 into G2 if P
do so. Furthermore, it is readily seen that all the conditions of Definition 13 are satisfied
by the sequence (R, S, I) as soon as they are satisfied by P . The sequence (R, S, I) is thus
an independent edit path.
Proposition 3 Let P be an edit path between two graphs G1 and G2 . Let us further
denote by R, S and I the sequence of node and edge Removals, Substitutions and Insertions
performed by P , the order in each sequence being deduced from the one of P . Then:
• the graph Ĝ1 obtained from G1 by applying removal operations R is a subgraph of G1 ,
• the graph Ĝ2 obtained from G1 by applying the sequence of operations (R, S) is a
subgraph of G2 ,
• Both Ĝ1 and Ĝ2 correspond to a same common structural subgraph of G1 and G2 .
Proof:
1. Since the sequence R is an edit path, Ĝ1 is a graph by Proposition 1. Moreover, since
R is only composed of removal operations, we trivially have V̂1 ⊂ V1 and Ê1 ⊂ E1 .
The fact that Ê1 ⊂ E1 ∩ V̂1 × V̂1 is induced by the fact that Ĝ1 is a graph. Moreover,
if G1 is a labeled graph, since removal operations do not modify labels, labels on Ĝ1
are only the restriction of the ones on G1 to V̂1 and Ê1 .
2. The graph Ĝ2 is deduced from G1 by the edit path (R, S), it is thus a graph. Moreover, G2 is deduced from Ĝ2 by the sequence of insertions I. We thus trivially have:
V̂2 ⊂ V2 and Ê2 ⊂ E2 ∩ V̂2 × V̂2 . Moreover, since insertion operations do not modify
the label of existing elements, the restriction of the label functions of G2 to V̂2 and
Ê2 corresponds to the label functions of Ĝ2 .
3. Sub graph Ĝ2 is deduced from Ĝ1 by the sequence of substitution operations S. Since
substitution operations only modify label functions, the structure of both graphs is
the same and there exists a structural isomorphism between both graphs.
One should note that it may exist several structural isomorphisms between Ĝ1 and Ĝ2 .
The set of substitutions S fixes one of them, say f such that the image of any element of
Ĝ1 by f have the same label than the one defined by the substitution. More precisely, let
us suppose that we enlarge the set of substitution S by 0 cost substitutions so that all the
nodes and edges of Ĝ1 = (V̂1 , Ê1 , µ1 , ν1 ) are substituted. In this case, we have:
∀v ∈ V̂1 , µ2 (f (v)) = lv
∀e ∈ Ê1 , ν2 (f (e)) = le
where lv and le correspond to the labels defined by the substitutions of v and e and µ2 and
ν2 define respectively the node and edge labeling functions of G2 .
Corollary 1 Using the same notations than in Proposition 3, the cost γ(P ) of an edit path
is defined by:
X
γ(P ) =
cvd (v) +
X
v∈V1 \V̂1
e∈E1 \Ê1
X
X
+
v∈V2 \V̂2
cvi (v) +
ced (e) +
X
v∈V̂1
cei (e)
e∈E2 \Ê2
7
cvs (v) +
X
e∈Ê1
ces (e)
Proof: The edit path P and its rewriting in (R, S, I) have the same set of operations and
thus a same cost.
From G1 to Ĝ1 : Operations in R remove nodes in V1 \ V̂1 and edges in E1 \ Ê1 .
From Ĝ1 to Ĝ2 : Substitutions of S apply between the two graphs Ĝ1 and Ĝ2 . Let us
consider the set of substitutions S ′ which corresponds to the completion of S by 0
cost substitutions so that all nodes and edges of Ĝ1 are substituted. Both S and S ′
have a same cost. The cost of S ′ is defined as the sum of costs of the substituted
nodes and edges of Ĝ1 .
From Ĝ2 to G2 : Operations in I insert nodes of V2 \ V̂2 and edges of E2 \ Ê2 in order to
obtain G2 from Ĝ2 .
Remark 1 Using the same notations than Proposition 3 if both G1 and G2 are undirected
we have:
γ(P ) = γv (P ) + γe (P )
with
γv (P ) =
γe (P )
=
X
cvd (i) +
i∈V
1 \V̂1
1
2
X
X
cvs (i) +
cvi (k)
k∈V2 \V̂2
i∈V̂1
X
ces ((i, j)) +
(i,j)∈Ê1
X
ced ((i, j)) +
(i,j)∈E1 \Ê1
X
(k,l)∈E2 \Ê2
cei ((k, l))
Indeed, if both graphs G1 and G2 are undirected both (i, j) and (j, i) belong to E1 while
encoding a single edge e. The removal or the substitution of the edge e is thus counted
twice in γe (P ). In the same way (k, l) and (l, k) represent the same edge e of E2 \ Ê2 which
is thus inserted twice in γe (P ). The factor 12 of γe (P ) removes this double couting of edge
operations.
Corollary 2 If all costs do not depend on the node/edge involved in the operations, i.e.
edit cost functions cvd , ced , cvs , ces , cvi , and cei are constant, the cost of an edit path P is
equal to:
γ(P ) =
(|V1 | − |V̂1 |)cvd + (|E1 | − |Ê1 |)ced + Vf cvs + Ef ces
+ (|V2 | − |V̂2 |)cvi + (|E2 | − |Ê2 |)cei
where Vf (resp. Ef ) denotes the number of nodes (resp. edges) substituted with a non-zero
cost.
Moreover, minimizing the cost of such an edit path is equivalent to maximizing the
following formula:
def.
M (P ) = |V̂1 |(cvd + cvi ) + |Ê1 |(ced + cei ) − Vf cvs − Ef ces
Proof: We deduce immediately from Corollary 1 the following formula:
γ(P ) =
(|V1 | − |V̂1 |)cvd + (|E1 | − |Ê1 |)ced + Vf cvs + Ef ces
+ (|V2 | − |V̂2 |)cvi + (|E2 | − |Ê2 |)cei
We obtain by grouping constant terms:
γ(P ) =
|V1 |cvd + |E1 |ced + |V2 |cvi + |E2 |cei
i
h
− |V̂1 |cvd + |Ê1 |ced + |V̂2 |cvi + |Ê2 |cei − Vf cvs − Ef ces
8
Since there is a structural isomorphism between Ĝ1 and Ĝ2 , we have V̂1 = V̂2 and Ê1 = Ê2 .
So:
γ(P ) =
|V1 |cvd + |E1 |ced + |V2 |cvi + |E2 |cei
h
i
− |V̂1 |(cvd + cvi ) + |Ê1 |(ced + cei ) − Vf cvs − Ef ces
The first part of the above equation being constant, the minimization of γ(P ) is equivalent
to the maximization of the last part of the equation.
Definition 14 (Restricted edit path) A restricted edit path is an independent edit path
in which any node or any edge cannot be removed and then inserted.
The term restricted should be understood as minimal number of operations. The cost of
a restricted edit path may not be minimal (among all edit paths) if the cost of a removal
operation followed by an insertion is lower than the cost of the associated substitution.
However, such a drawback may be easily solved by setting a new substitution cost equal
to the minimum between the old substitution cost and the sum of the costs of a removal
and an insertion. In this case all non-zero cost substitutions, for nodes and edges, may be
equivalently replaced by a removal followed by an insertion.
Proposition 4 If G1 and G2 are simple graphs, there is a one-to-one mapping between
the set of restricted edit paths between G1 and G2 and the set of injective functions from
a subset of V1 to V2 . We denote by ϕ0 , the special function from the empty set onto the
empty set.
Proof: Let P denote an edit path. If no node substitution occurs, all node of G1 are first
removed and then all nodes of G2 are inserted. We associate this edit path to ϕ0 .
If substitutions occur. We associate to P the function previously mentioned which
maps each substituted node of V1 onto the corresponding node of G2 .
Let ψ denotes this mapping. Let us consider an injective function f 6= ϕ0 from a set
Vˆ1 ⊂ V1 onto V2 . We associate to f the sets of node
• removals: cvd (v → ǫ), v ∈ V1 − Vˆ1 ,
• insertions: cvi (ǫ → v), v ∈ V2 − f (Vˆ1 ), and
• substitutions: cvs (v → f (v)), v ∈ Vˆ1 .
Moreover, since G1 and G2 are simple graphs it exists at most one edge between any pair
of nodes. We thus define the following set of edge operations:
• removals: ced ((i, j) → ǫ) such that i or j does not belong to Vˆ1 or (f (i), f (j)) do not
belongs to E2 ,
• insertions cei (ǫ → (k, l)) such that k or l does not belong to f (Vˆ1 ) or (f −1 (k), f −1 (l))
do not belongs to E1 ,
• substitutions ces ((i, j) → (f (i), f (j))), (i, j) ∈ (Vˆ1 × Vˆ1 ) ∩ E1 and (f (i), f (j))) ∈ E2 .
Let us denote respectively by R, S and I the set of removals/substitutions/insertions defined both on node and edges. The sequence (R, S, I) defines a valid restricted edit path
whose image by ψ is by construction equal to f . The function ψ is thus surjective.
Let us consider two different edit paths P = (R, S, I) and P ′ = (R′ , S ′ , I ′ ). Then:
• If R 6= R′ . If node removals are not equal, ψ(P ) and ψ(P ′ ) are not defined on the
same set and are consequently not equal. Otherwize, let us suppose that an edge (i, j)
is removed in P and not in P ′ . Let us further suppose that ψ(P )(i) = ψ(P ′ )(i) and
ψ(P )(j) = ψ(P ′ )(j). Since (i, j) is not removed in P ′ we have (ψ(P )(i), ψ(P )(j)) =
(ψ(P ′ )(i), ψ(P ′ )(j)) ∈ E2 . The edge (i, j) should thus be first removed and then
inserted in P which contradicts the definition of a restricted edit path. Therefore,
one of the two following conditions should holds:
9
1. ψ(P )(i) 6= ψ(P ′ )(i) or ψ(P )(j) 6= ψ(P ′ )(j),
2. the set of edge removal operations is the same in P and P ′ .
If the first condition holds ψ(P ) 6= ψ(P ′ ). If the second condition holds, since R 6= R′ ,
the set of node removals is different in P and P ′ . In this case we get also ψ(P ) 6= ψ(P ′ ).
• If S 6= S ′ . Node substitutions are different if they are either defined on different sets
or do not correspond to the same node mapping. In both cases, ψ(P ) 6= ψ(P ′ ). If
node substitutions are identical but if S and S ′ differ by the edge substitutions, an
edge of G1 is substituted by P and P ′ to an edge of G2 with two different labels.
Since an edge may be substituted at most once in an independent edit path, either
P or P ′ is not a valid edit path between G1 and G2 . Hence S and S ′ differ only if
their node substitutions differ, in which case we have ψ(P ) 6= ψ(P ′ ).
• If I 6= I ′ (with R = R′ and S = S ′ ). If a node k ∈ V2 is inserted by I but not by
I ′ , this means that k is substituted by S ′ . Hence we contradict S = S ′ . In the same
way, if an edge (k, l) ∈ E2 is inserted by I and not by I ′ , (k, l) is substituted by S ′
but not by S. We again contradict S = S ′ .
Note that the last item of the previous decomposition shows (as a side demonstration) that
given the initial and final graphs, a restricted edit path is fully defined by its set of removals
and substitutions. Moreover, if the set of removals or substitutions of two restricted edit
paths differ, then the associated mapping is different. The function ψ is thus injective and
hence bijective.
Proposition 5 Let P be a restricted edit path not associated with ϕ0 (hence with some
substitutions). Let us denote by ϕ : Vˆ1 → V2 the injective function associated to P and let
us denote ϕ(Vˆ1 ) by Vˆ2 . We further introduce the following two sets:
R12
I21
=
=
{(i, j) ∈ E1 ∩ (Vˆ1 × Vˆ1 ) | (ϕ(i), ϕ(j)) 6∈ E2 }
{(k, l) ∈ E2 ∩ (Vˆ2 × Vˆ2 ) | (ϕ−1 (k), ϕ−1 (k)) 6∈ E1 }
• The set of substituted/removed/inserted nodes by P are respectively equal to: Vˆ1 ,
V1 \ Vˆ1 and V2 \ Vˆ2 .
• The set of edges substituted/removed/inserted by P are respectively equal to:
– Substituted: Ê1 = E1 ∩ (Vˆ1 × Vˆ1 ) \ R12
with Ê2 = ϕ(Eˆ1 ) = E2 ∩ (Vˆ2 × Vˆ2 ) \ I21
– Removed: E1 \ Ê1 = E1 ∩ ((V1 \ Vˆ1 ) × V1 ) ∪ (V1 × (V1 \ Vˆ1 )) ∪ R12
– Inserted: E2 \ Ê2 = E2 ∩ ((V2 \ Vˆ2 ) × V2 ) ∪ (V2 × (V2 \ Vˆ2 )) ∪ I21
Proof: Node substitions/removal/insertions are direct consequences of the proof of Proposition 4 and the bijective mapping between injective functions from a subset Vˆ1 ⊂ V1 onto
V2 and restricted edit paths.
• If (i, j) ∈ Eˆ1 , {ϕ(i), ϕ(j)} ⊂ Vˆ2 and (ϕ(i), ϕ(j)) ∈ E2 . Since (i, j) cannot be removed
and then inserted it must be substituted. Conversely, if (i, j) ∈ E1 is substituted, i
an j must be substituted ({i, j} ⊂ Vˆ1 ). Moreover, the edge (ϕ(i), ϕ(j)) should exists
in E2 . Hence (i, j) 6∈ R12 and (i, j) ∈ Ê1 .
If (k, l) ∈ Eˆ2 = ϕ(Eˆ1 ), it exits (i, j) ∈ E1 such that k = ϕ(i) and l = ϕ(j). Hence
(k, l) 6∈ I21 . Since (i, j) 6∈ R12 , (k, l) ∈ E2 and {k, l} ⊂ Vˆ2 . Hence (k, l) ∈ ϕ(Eˆ1 ) =
E2 ∩ (Vˆ2 × Vˆ2 ) \ I21 . Conversely, if (k, l) ∈ E2 ∩ (Vˆ2 × Vˆ2 ) \ I21 , it exits (i, j) such that
k = ϕ(i) and l = ϕ(j) ({k, l} ∈ Vˆ2 ). Since (k, l) ∈ E2 \ I21 we have (i, j) ∈ E1 \ R12 .
Finally, {k, l} ⊂ Vˆ2 implies that {i, j} ⊂ Vˆ1 hence (i, j) ∈ Eˆ1 and (k, l) ∈ Ê2 = ϕ(Eˆ1 ).
10
• Any non substited edge of G1 must be removed. Hence, the set of removed edges is
equal to E1 \ Ê1 . The remaining equation, is deduced by a negation of the conditions
defining Ê1 .
• In the same way, any edge of G2 which is not produced by a substitution of an edge
of G1 must be inserted. Hence, the set of inserted edges is equal to E2 \ Eˆ2 . The
negation of the condition defining Eˆ2 provides the remaining equation.
2.3
Linear and quadratic assignment problems
Within this report, an assignment corresponds to a bijective mapping ϕ : X →Y between
two finite sets X and Y having the same size |X | = |Y| = n. When these sets are reduced to
the same set of integers, i.e. X = Y = {1, . . . , n}, the bijection ϕ reduces to the permutation
(ϕ(1), . . . , ϕ(n)). Any permutation ϕ can be represented by a n × n permutation matrix
X = (xi,j )i,j=1,...,n with
(
1 if j = ϕ(i)
xi,j =
(2)
0 else
More generally, recall that a permutation matrix is defined as follows.
Definition 15 (Permutation Matrix) A n × n matrix X is a permutation matrix iff it
satisfies the following contraints:
n
X
xi,j = 1
∀j
=
1,
.
.
.
,
n,
i=1
n
X
(3)
xi,j = 1
∀i = 1, . . . , n,
j=1
∀i, j = 1, . . . , n, xi,j ∈ {0, 1}
These constraints ensure X to be binary and doubly stochastic (sum of rows and sum of
columns equal to 1).
The selection of a relevant assignment, among all possible ones from X to Y, depends
on the problem. Nevertheless, each assignment is commonly penalized by a cost, and a
relevant assignment becomes one having a minimal or a maximal cost. In this report, we
consider minimal costs only. The cost of an assignment is usually defined as a sum of
elementary costs. An elementary cost may penalize the assignment of an element of X to
an element of Y, or the simultaneaous assignment of two elements i and j of X to two
elements k and l of Y, respectively.
Definition 16 (Linear Sum Assignment Problem (LSAP)) Let C ∈ [0, +∞)n×n be
a matrix such that ci,j corresponds to the cost of assigning the element i ∈ X to the element j ∈ Y. The Linear Sum Assignment Problem (LSAP) consists in finding an optimal
permutation
)
( n
X
(4)
ci,ϕ(i) | ϕ ∈ Sn
ϕ̂ ∈ argmin
i=1
where Sn is the set of all permutations of {1, . . . , n}. Equivalently, the LSAP consists in
finding an optimal n × n permutation matrix
n
n X
X
ci,j xi,j | X satisfies Eq. 3 .
(5)
X̂ ∈ argmin
i=1 j=1
2
Let c = vec(C) ∈ [0, +∞)n be the vectorization of the cost matrix C, obtained by con2
catenating its rows. Similarly, let x = vec(X) ∈ {0, 1}n be the vectorization of X. Then,
the LSAP consists in finding an optimal vector
n
o
2
x̂ ∈ argmin cT x | Lx = 12n , x ∈ {0, 1}n ,
(6)
11
where the linear system Lx = 1 is the matrix version of the constraints defined by Eq. 3.
2
The matrix L ∈ {0, 1}2n×n represents the node-edge incidence matrix of the complete
bipartite graph Kn,n with node sets X and Y:
(
1 if (j = i) ∨ (k = i)
li,(j,k) =
(7)
0 else
The system Lx = 1, together with the binary constraint on x, selects exactly one edge of
Kn,n for each element of X ∪ Y. In other terms, these constraints represent a subgraph of
Kn,n , with node sets X and Y, such that each node has degree one. Indeed, the LSAP is
a weighted bipartite graph matching problem.
More details on the LSAP can be found in [34, 4]. In particular, Eq. 6 is a binary linear
programming problem, efficiently solvable in polynomial time complexity, for instance with
the Hungarian algorithm [17, 24, 19] combined with pre-processing steps [14]. In our
experiments, we have used the O(n3 ) (time complexity) version of the Hungarian algorithm
proposed in [19, 4].
Problems that incorporate pairwise constraints, i.e. simultaneously assigning two
elements of X to two elements of Y, can be cast as a quadratic assignment problem
[16, 18, 19, 23, 4]. This is the case for the graph matching problem, and for the GED as
demonstrated in Section 4. In this paper, we consider the general expression of quadratic
assignment problems [18].
2
2
Definition 17 (Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP)) Let D ∈ [0, +∞)n ×n be
a matrix such that dik,jl corresponds to the cost of simultaneously assigning the elements i
and j of X to the elements k and l of Y, respectively. The quadratic assignment problem
(QAP) consists in finding an optimal permutation
n X
n
X
diϕ(i),jϕ(j) | ϕ ∈ Sn .
(8)
ϕ̂ ∈ argmin
i=1 j=1
Equivalently, the QAP consists in finding an optimal n × n permutation matrix
n X
n X
n X
n
X
X̂ ∈ argmin
dik,jl xi,k xj,l | X satisfies Eq. 3 .
i=1 k=1 j=1 l=1
Note that i ∈ X is assigned to k ∈ Y, and j ∈ X is assigned to l ∈ Y, simultaneously iff
xi,k = xj,l = 1.
The QAP can be rewritten as a quadratic program:
o
n
2
argmin xT Dx | Lx = 12n , x ∈ {0, 1}n
where x is the vectorization of X, and the right-hand side is the matrix version of the
constraints defined by Eq. 3.
The quadratic term is able to incorporate a linear one. Indeed, any simultenous assignment of the same element i ∈ X to the same element k ∈ Y is penalized by the cost dik,ik ,
i.e. a diagonal element of D. Since xi,k ∈ {0, 1}, we have dik,ik xi,k xi,k = dik,ik xi,k . Then
the total contribution of diagonal elements to the quadratic cost is given by
n X
n
X
dik,ik xi,k = diag(D)T x
i=1 k=1
where diag denotes the diagonal vector. So, if diag(D) 6= 0, the quadratic functional incorporates a linear term which decribes the linear sum assignment between the elements of
X and Y. When these constraints are also part of the underlying problem, it is sometimes
more convenient to rewritte the QAP as
n
o
2
argmin xT Dx + cT x | Lx = 12n , x ∈ {0, 1}n
(9)
12
where diag(D) = 0, and c is the cost of assigning each element of X to each element of Y.
As the GED, the QAP is in general NP-hard, and exact algorithms can only be used
with sets of small cardinality [4]. Indeed, the cost functional is generally not convex, and
methods based on relaxation and linearization are usually considered to find an approximate solution. See Section 5 for more details.
3
Bipartite Graph Edit Distance
As already mentionned, the GED can be challenging to compute, even on small graphs. In
order to deal with such a complexity, several methods approximate the GED by computing
an optimal linear sum assignment between the nodes of the two graphs to be compared.
This is formalized through the definition of a specific LSAP [31, 26] that takes into account
edit operations, as described in this section. In particular, we show in Section 3.1 that there
is a one-to-one relation between restricted edit paths and assignment matrices.
3.1
Edit operations, assignments and restricted edit paths
Let X and Y be two finite sets, with |X | = n and |Y| = m. Without loss of generality,
we assume that X = {1, . . . , n} and Y = {1, . . . , m}. Each element of X can be assigned to
an element of Y. Such a mapping represents a possible substitution. Also each element of
X can be removed, and each element of Y can be inserted into X . In order to represent
insertions, X is augmented by m dummy elements EX = {ǫ1 , . . . , ǫm }, such that j ∈ Y can
only be inserted into Y by assiging ǫj to j. Similarly, the set Y is augmented by n dummy
elements EY = {ǫ1 , . . . , ǫn }, such that i ∈ X is removed by assigning it to ǫi . In other terms,
it is not possible to assign an element i ∈ X to an element ǫk ∈ EY with k 6= i, and similarly
any assignment from ǫj ∈ EX to k ∈ Y with k 6= j is forbidden.
Let X ǫ = X ∪ EX and Y ǫ = Y ∪ EY be the two augmented sets, which thus have the same
size n + m. We assume without loss of generality that symbols ǫi and ǫj represent integers,
i.e. EX = {n + 1, . . . , n + m} and EY = {m + 1, . . . , m + n}. It is now possible to define
assignments that take into account removal, substitution, and insertion of elements.
Definition 18 (ǫ-assignment) An ǫ-assignment from X to Y is a bijective mapping
ψ : X ǫ → Y ǫ , here a permutation, such that for each element of X ǫ one of the four following cases occurs:
1. Substitutions: ψ(i) = j with (i, j) ∈ X × Y.
2. Removals: ψ(i) = ǫi with i ∈ X .
3. Insertions: ψ(ǫj ) = j with j ∈ Y.
4. Finally ψ(ǫj ) = ǫi allow to complete the bijective property of ψ, and thus should be
ignored. This occurs when i ∈ X and j ∈ Y are both substituted.
Let Ψǫ (X , Y) be the set of all ǫ-assignments from X to Y.
In other terms, an ǫ-assignment is a bijection (or permutation) with additional constraints.
The corresponding (n + m) × (m + n) permutation matrix can be decomposed as follows:
1···m
Xsub
X =
ins
X
ǫ1 · · · ǫn
Xrem
Xǫ
1
.
..
n
ǫ1
.
.
.
ǫm
(10)
where matrix Xsub ∈ {0, 1}n×m encodes node substitutions, Xrem ∈ {0, 1}n×n encodes node
removals, and Xins ∈ {0, 1}m×m encodes node insertions. Matrix Xǫ ∈ {0, 1}m×n is an
13
auxiliary matrix (case 4 above), it ensures that X is a permutation matrix. Due to the
constraints on dummy nodes (cases 2 and 3 above) matrices Xrem and Xins always satisfy:
∀(i, j) ∈ {1, . . . , n}2 , i 6= j,
xrem
i,j = 0
(11)
∀(i, j) ∈ {1, . . . , m}2 , i 6= j, xins
i,j = 0.
Definition 19 (ǫ-assignment matrix) A (n + m) × (m + n) matrix satisfying equations
3, 10 and 11 is called an ǫ-assignment matrix. The set of all (n + m) × (m + n) ǫ-assignment
matrices is denoted by An,m .
The auxiliary matrix Xǫ in Eq. 10 suggests the definition of an equivalence relation between
ǫ-assignment matrices.
Definition 20 Two ǫ-assignment matrices X1 and X2 , defined by the two sequences of
rem
ins
ǫ
sub
rem
ins
ǫ
block matrices (Xsub
1 , X1 , X1 , X1 ) and (X2 , X2 , X2 , X2 ), are equivalent iff
rem
ins
ins
= Xrem
(Xsub
= Xsub
2 ) ∧ (X1
2 ) ∧ (X1 = X2 ).
1
The set of ǫ-assignment matrices up to this equivalence relation is denoted by A∼
n,m .
Proposition 6 There is a one-to-one relation between A∼
n,m and the set of injective functions from a subset of X to Y.
Proof: Recall that X = {1, . . . , n} and Y = {1, . . . , m}. Let X = (Xsub , Xrem , Xins , Xǫ ) =
(Q, R, S, T) denote an ǫ-assignment matrix. If Q = 0 we associate to X the application ϕ0
from the empty set onto itself (Proposition 4). Otherwise, let us introduce the set:
X̂ = {i ∈ X | ∃j ∈ Y, qi,j = 1}
Since X is a permutation matrix, for any i ∈ Xˆ there is exactly one j ∈ Y such that qi,j = 1.
We can thus define the mapping:
X̂ → Y
ϕX
i
7→ j
Moreover if ϕX (i1 ) = ϕX (i2 ) then we have qi1 ,j = qi2 ,j = 1. Since X is a permutation matrix,
such a case is possible only if i1 = i2 , and ϕX is thus injective. We can thus associate to
each assignement matrix an injective function ϕX from a subset of X to Y. We denote by
χ this mapping. We have to show that χ is bijective.
Consider an injective mapping ϕ from a subset X̂ onto Y. If ϕ = ϕ0 , we have χ(X) = ϕ0
with X = (0n×m , In×n , Im×m , 0m×n ). Otherwise, the sub-blocks of X are defined as follows:
(
1 iff ∃i ∈ X̂ , with ϕ(i) = j,
qi,j =
0 else
(
1 iff i ∈ X \ Xˆ
ri,i =
0 else
(
1 iff j ∈ Y \ ϕ[Xˆ ]
sj,j =
0 else
Note that off-diagonal elements of R and S are equal to 0 by definition of ǫ-assignement
matrices (Eq. 11).
By using the above definition, qi,j = 1 ⇒ ri,i = sj,j = 0. Hence, if T was filled with 0,
the line corresponding to ǫi ∈ Y ǫ (column m + i) and ǫj ∈ X ǫ (row n + j) would be filled by
0 in X, which would thus not be an ǫ-assignment matrix. Moreover, since ϕ is injective,
we have |Xˆ| = |ϕ[Xˆ ]|. Hence the set of indices:
A = {(j, i) ∈ {1, . . . , m} × {1, . . . , n} | qi,j = 1}
defines a square submatrix of T, which can be defined as a permutation matrix on A and 0
elsewhere. Now we check that each row and column of X = (Q, R, S, T) contains exactly
one value equal to 1.
14
For the rows:
• If i ∈ X̂ , then ϕ(i) = j, qi,j = 1 and ri,i = 0. Moreover, since ϕ is an application, we
have qi,j ′ = 0 for any j ′ ∈ Y \ {j}.
• If i ∈ X \ X̂ , by definition qi,j = 0 for all j ∈ Y and ri,i = 1. There is thus a single 1
in row i.
• For j ∈ Y with sj,j = 1, by definition of S we have j ∈ Y \ ϕ[Xˆ ], and thus ∀i ∈
X , qi,j = 0. Hence there is no i such that (j, i) ∈ A. By definition of T, its row j is
filled with 0.
• For j ∈ Y with sj,j = 0, then j ∈ ϕ[X ] and it exists a unique i ∈ X such that
qi,j = 1. Hence (j, i) ∈ A. Since T defines a permutation matrix on A, it should
exists a unique k satisfying (j, k) ∈ A such that tj,k = 1. This value is unique on the
row j of T by definition of T.
Hence for each element of X ǫ , there is a unique 1 on the corresponding row of X.
The proof for columns is similar. So there is a unique 1 value on each row and each
column of X. Matrix X is thus a permutation matrix. Moreover, since elements of the
blocks R and S are equal to 0 on off-diagonal indices, X is an ǫ-assignement matrix with
χ(X) = ϕ, by construction.
The application χ is thus surjective. Let us show that it is also injective. To this
end, we consider two non-equivalent assignement matrices X = (Q, R, S, T) and X′ =
(Q′ , R′ , S′ , T′ ).
• If Q 6= Q′ , then we may suppose without loss of generality that there exists (i, j) ∈
′
X × Y such that qi,j = 1 and qi,j
= 0. Since qi,j = 1, i ∈ X̂X , where XˆX denotes the
subset of X on which χ(X) is defined.
′
′
– If qi,j
∈ Y then i ∈ X \ X̂X′ . Hence χ(X) and χ(X′ ) are not
′ = 0 for all j
defined on the same set and are consequently not equal.
′
′
′
– If it exists j ′ ∈ Y such that qi,j
′ = 1 we have χ(X)(i) = j and χ(X )(i) = j .
′
Applications χ(X) and χ(X ) are consequently not equal.
′
• If R 6= R′ we may suppose that it exists i ∈ X such that ri,i = 1 and ri,i
= 0. Hence
′
i 6∈ XˆX and i ∈ XˆX′ . Applications χ(X) and χ(X ) are not defined on the same set
and are consequently not equal.
• If S 6= S′ , let us consider j ∈ Y such that sj,j = 1 and s′j,j = 0. We have j 6∈ χ(X)[XˆX ]
and j ∈ χ(X′ )[XˆX′ ]. Applications χ(X) and χ(X′ ) have different set of mappings
and are consequently not equal.
Note that we do need to consider matrix T since this matrix is not implied in the equivalence
relationship. In all cases application χ maps two non-equivalent ǫ-assignement matrices to
different injective functions. The application χ is thus injective.
Application χ being both surjective and injective, it is bijective.
So, ǫ-assignment matrices on X ǫ and Y ǫ , and injective functions defined on a subset of X
onto Y, are in one-to-one correspondence.
It is now possible to link ǫ-assignments to edit paths. Consider two simple graphs G1
and G2 , with node sets V1 and V2 respectively. An ǫ-assignment from V1 to V2 can be
defined by constructing the sets V1ǫ and V2ǫ . According to the above proposition, there is
a one-to-one correspondence between ǫ-assignment matrices on V1ǫ and V2ǫ , and injective
functions defined on a subset of V1 onto V2 . By using Proposition 4, we can connect such a
mapping to a restricted edit path between G1 and G2 (Definition 10). Up to the equivalence
relation (Definition 20), there is thus a one-to-one correspondence between ǫ-assignment
matrices and restricted edit paths.
This shows that restricted edit paths can be deduced from ǫ-assignments.
15
3.2
LSAP for ǫ-assignments
Let X = {1, . . . , n} and Y = {1, . . . , m} be two sets. These two sets are augmented by
dummy elements as described in the previous section, i.e. X ǫ = X ∪ EX and Y ǫ = Y ∪ EY .
An ǫ-assignment from X to Y, i.e. a bijective mapping from X ǫ onto Y ǫ , represents a set
of edit operations.
The selection of a relevant ǫ-assignment is realized through the design of a pairwise cost
function adapted to edit operations. To this, each possible mapping of an element i ∈ X ǫ
to an element j ∈ Y ǫ is penalized by a non-negative cost ci,j . All costs can be encoded by
a (n + m) × (m + n) matrix (having the same structure as ǫ-assignment matrices) [31, 26]
1···m
ǫ1 · · · ǫn
Crem
Csub
C =
ins
C
0m,n
1
.
..
n
ǫ1
.
.
.
ǫm
(12)
where the matrix Csub ∈ [0, +∞)n×m encodes substitution costs, Crem ∈ [0, +∞)n×n encodes removal costs, and Cins ∈ [0, +∞)m×m encodes insertion costs. According to cases 2
and 3 in Definition 18, off-diagonal values of Crem and Cins are typically set to a large value
ω, such that max{ci,ψ(i) | ∀i ∈ X ǫ , ∀ψ ∈ Ψǫ (X , Y)} ≪ ω < +∞, in order to avoid forbidden
mappings. According to case 4 in Definition 18, the mapping of any ǫi to an ǫj should
not induce any cost, so the last block of C is set to the null matrix 0m,n . The cost of an
ǫ-assignment ψ can then be measured by the sum (see Definition 18 for the decomposition)
n+m
X
i=1
ci,ψ(i) =
X
ci,ψ(i) +
ci,ǫi +
i∈X \X̂
i∈X̂
|
X
{z
}
|
substitutions
{z
removals
X
cǫj ,j .
(13)
j∈Y−ψ[X̂ ]
}
|
{z
insertions
}
where Xˆ = {i ∈ X | ∃j ∈ Y, ψ(i) = j}.
An optimal ǫ-assignment is then defined as one having a minimal cost (several optimal
ǫ-assignment may exist) among all ǫ-assignments:
)
(n+m
X
ci,ψ(i) | ψ ∈ Ψǫ (X , Y)
(14)
ψ̂ ∈ argmin
i=1
which is a LSAP (Section 2.3). It can thus be rewritten as a binary programming problem
(Eq. 6)
x̂ ∈ argmin cT x | x ∈ vec[A∼
(15)
n,m ] ,
2
where x = vec(X) ∈ {0, 1}(n+m) is the vectorization of the ǫ-assignment matrix X associ2
ated with ψ (Eq. 10), c = vec(C) ∈ [0, +∞)(n+m) is the vectorization of the cost matrix C,
2
(n+m)
and vec[A∼
is the set of all vectorized ǫ-assignment matrices. Note that,
n,m ] ⊂ {0, 1}
using equation 13, two equivalent ǫ-assignment matrices have a same cost.
The optimal solution of the LSAP defined by Eq. 15 can be computed by any algorithm that solves LSAPs, such as Hungarian-type algorithms. Note that mappings in Ψǫ ,
or matrices in An,m , are much more constrained than bijective mappings or permutation
matrices. These constraints, i.e. forbidden assignments, are satisfied in [31, 26] through
the large ω values in the cost matrix. This is a classical trick used in LSAPs to avoid some
specific assignments of elements [4]. While these assignments are avoided, the corresponding large ω values are still treated by the algorithms. A better way to take into account the
additionnal constraints would be to modify the algorithms such that forbidden assignments
are not treated at all. This is the choice we made in our experimentations. This improves
the time complexity.
16
3.3
Bipartite GED
It is now possible to define a framework to approximate the GED, based on ǫ-assignments
and the corresponding LSAP [31, 37, 26, 10, 27]. Within this framework, a resulting
approximate GED is called a bipartite GED.
Let G1 and G2 be two graphs, with node sets V1 and V2 respectively. The computation
of a bipartite GED from G1 to G2 is performed in four main steps detailed below.
Step 1 - construction of the bags of patterns. For each node of each graph a bag
of patterns is constructed. This bag represents a part of the graph connected to a specific
node by some structured subgraphs, such as incident edges [31, 26], subtrees [37] or walks
[10]. A set of bags of patterns is then obtained for each graph. Let B1 and B2 be the ones
associated to G1 and to G2 respectively. We have thus |B1 | = |V1 | and |B2 | = |V2 |. The idea
is then to find an optimal ǫ-assignment from B1 to B2 , according to a given pairwise cost
matrix.
Step 2 - construction of the cost matrix. Each possible mapping of a bag bi ∈ B1 to
a bag bj ∈ B2 is penalized by a cost measuring the affinity between the two bags. This cost
is initially defined as the cost of editing bi such that it is transformed into bj , i.e. the cost
of an optimal ǫ-assignment of the elements of the two bags [31, 26, 10, 27]. Also the bags
of B1 can be removed, and the bags of B2 can be inserted into B1 , which is penalized by a
cost measuring the relevance of the bag. In order to approximate the GED, all theses costs
depend on the original edit cost functions defined in Section 2.2. They are encoded by a
cost matrix C (Eq. 12). Note that in this step |V1 | × |V2 | LSAP are solved for computing
the costs of assigning bags of B1 to bags of B2 .
Step 3 - construction of an ǫ-assignment between the nodes. Given the cost
matrix C computed in the previous step, an optimal ǫ-assignment from B1 to B2 is then
computed by solving again a LSAP. The computed optimal assignment hence provides an
optimal mapping ψ ∈ Ψǫ (V1 , V2 ).
Step 4 - construction of a restricted edit path. The ǫ-assignment ψ can be interpreted as a partial edit path between the graphs G1 and G2 . Indeed, it is only composed
of edit operations involving nodes. Therefore this partial edit path has to be completed
with edit operations applied on edges. This set of edit operations is directly induced by
the set of edit operations operating on nodes, defined by the mapping computed in the
previous step. The substitution, removal or insertion of any edge depends thus on the edit
operations performed on its incident nodes. The cost of the complete edit path is finally
defined by the sum of edit operations on nodes and edges. This cost only corresponds to
an approximation of the GED between G1 and G2 since the mapping computed during
Step 3 may not be optimal. Therefore, this cost corresponds to an overestimation of the
exact GED, known as bipartite GED.
The definition of the cost matrix C in Step 2 is a keypoint of the framework. The
initial approach proposed in [31, 26] defines bag of patterns as the corresponding node
itself and its direct neighborhood, i.e. the set of incident edges and adjacent nodes. The
cost of assigning a bag bi ∈ B1 to a bag bj ∈ B2 is then defined as the substitution cost of
the associated node i ∈ V1 and j ∈ V2 , plus the cost associated to an optimal ǫ-assignment
between the two sets composed of their incident edges and their adjacent nodes. Using such
bags of patterns can be discriminant enough, in which case the bipartite GED provides
a good approximation of the GED. But this approach lacks of accuracy in some cases, in
particular when the direct neighbourhood of the nodes is homogeneous in the graph. When
considering such graphs, the cost associated to each pair of bags do not differ sufficiently,
and the optimal ǫ-assignment depends more on the traversal of the nodes by the LSAP
solver than on the graph’s structure.
In order to improve the accuracy of the bipartite GED, the information attached to
each node needs to be more global, for instance by considering bags of walks up to a length
17
k [10], instead of the direct neighbourhood. This approach follows the same scheme as the
one used in [31, 26], except that patterns associated to a node are defined as walks of length
k starting at this node. Considering bags of such patterns allow to extend the amount of
information associated to the nodes, which leads to a better approximation of the GED.
However, the use of bags of walks induces some drawbacks. First, the set of computed
walks suffers from the tottering phenomenon which leads to consider irrelevant patterns,
especially when considering high values of k. These irrelevant patterns affect the cost of
the ǫ-assignment, and thus the quality of the approximation of the GED. In addition, the
mapping cost between two bags of walks can only be approximated, which induces another
loss of accuracy.
These drawbacks can be avoided by using bags of subgraphs rather than bags of walks,
such as all subgraphs centered on a given node and up to a radius k [5]. The cost associated
to the mapping of two bags of such patterns is defined as the edit distance between the two
k-subgraphs centered on the respective nodes. Despite the fact that we can control the size
of these subgraphs thanks to the parameter k, this approach requires significantly more
computational time than the previous ones. However, the use of accurate sub-structures
allows to obtain a better approximation of the GED.
4
GED as a Quadratic Assignment Problem
The bipartite GED is a good candidate approximation of the GED, but it is based on the
construction of a restricted edit path which generally does not have a minimal cost. Costs
on edges can only be deduced from operations performed on their two incident nodes.
This cannot be taken into account by the approach based on the LSAP, which considers
information about edges separately in each node. To fully describe the GED, the model
must take into account simultaneous node and edge assignments. This can be formalized
as a quadratic assignment problem [31, 26]. In this section, we propose to extend the linear
model to a quadratic one based on ǫ-assignments, and we show that this model corresponds
to the cost of a restricted edit path.
4.1
Simultaneous node assignment and quadratic cost
Let G1 = (V1 , E1 ) and G2 = (V2 , E2 ) be two graphs, and let ψ ∈ Ψ(V1ǫ , V2ǫ ) be an ǫassignment (Definition 18). When a pair (i, j) ∈ V1ǫ × V1ǫ is assigned by ψ to a pair
(ψ(i), ψ(j)) ∈ V2ǫ × V2ǫ , one of the following cases occurs:
1. Edge substitution: (ψ(i), ψ(j)) ∈ E2 with (i, j) ∈ E1 .
2. Edge removal: (ψ(i), ψ(j)) 6∈ E2 with (i, j) ∈ E1 .
3. Edge insertion: (ψ(i), ψ(j)) ∈ E2 with (i, j) 6∈ E1 .
4. Finally (ψ(i), ψ(j)) 6∈ E2 with (i, j) 6∈ E1 allows to complete the bijection property.
Each possible simultaneous mapping of nodes i, j ∈ V1ǫ onto respectively nodes k and l
in V2ǫ , is penalized by a non-negative cost dik,jl which depends on the underlying edit
operation described by one of the cases above. The overall edge’s cost associated to a
simultaneous node assignment is then measured by:
d(ψ) =
n+m
X n+m
X
diψ(i),jψ(j) ,
(16)
i=1 j=1
where cost values are defined as follows.
Recall that all mappings from a node of V1ǫ to a node of V2ǫ are not allowed. Indeed
(Section 3.1), i → ǫj with i ∈ V1 and j 6= i, and reciprocally ǫk → l with l ∈ V2 and k 6= l are
forbidden. Then, a simultaneous node mapping involving at least one of these two cases is
also forbidden. We denote by 6→ a forbidden mapping. As in Section 3.2, the cost is set to
a (large) value ω in this case.
For any other simultaneous node mapping (i → k, j → l), with i, j ∈ V1ǫ and k, l ∈ V2ǫ , its
cost depends on the presence or the absence of edges (i, j) ∈ E1 and (k, l) ∈ E2 :
18
• If (i, j) ∈ E1 and (k, l) ∈ E2 then dik,jl is the cost of the edge assignment (i, j) → (k, l),
i.e. edge substitution.
• If (i, j) ∈ E1 and (k, l) 6∈ E2 then dik,jl is the cost of removing the edge (i, j).
• If (i, j) 6∈ E1 and (k, l) ∈ E2 then dik,jl is the cost of inserting the edge (k, l).
• Else, the simultaneous mapping must not influence the overall cost and so its cost is
always set to 0.
By using the edit cost functions defined in Section 2.2, the cost of an allowed simultaneous
node mapping is then defined by
ce (i → k, j → l) = ces ((i, j) → (k, l)) δ(i,j)∈E1 δ(k,l)∈E2
+ ced (i, j) δ(i,j)∈E1 (1 − δ(k,l)∈E2 )
(17)
+ cei (k, l) (1 − δ(i,j)∈E1 )δ(k,l)∈E2
where δe ∈ E = 1 if e ∈ E and 0 else, (i, j) → ǫ denotes edge removal and ǫ → (k, l) denotes
edge insertion. Since graphs do not have self-loops, we have dik,ik = 0 for all i ∈ V1ǫ and
k ∈ V2ǫ . Remark also that the symmetry of ce (i → k, j → l) depends on the one of edit
operations and the one of directed edges when the two graphs are directed.
Finally, the cost of a simultaneous node mapping is given by
(
ω
if (i 6→ k) ∨ (j 9 l)
dik,jl =
(18)
ce (i → k, j → l) else
2
(n+m)
Let x ∈ vec[A∼
be the vectorization of the ǫ-assignment matrix asson,m ] ⊂ {0, 1}
ciated to ψ. All costs can be represented by a (n + m)2 × (n + m)2 matrix D = (dik,jl )i,k,j,l
such that dik,jl xik xjl = diψ(i),jψ(j) if xik = xjl = 1, and 0 else. So each row and each column
of D, and x, have the same organization of pairwise indices, and then the total cost of the
simultaneous node assignment can be written in quadratic form as:
d(ψ) =
n+m
X m+n
X n+m
X m+n
X
dik,jl xik xjl = xT Dx,
i=1 k=1 j=1 l=1
The cost matrix D can be
D1,1 · · ·
..
..
.
.
Dn,1 · · ·
D=
Dǫ1 ,1 · · ·
..
..
.
.
Dǫm ,1
···
decomposed as follows into blocks:
D1,ǫ1 · · · D1,ǫm
D1,n
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
n,ǫm
n,ǫ1
n,n
··· D
D
D
Dǫ1 ,n Dǫ1 ,ǫ1 · · · Dǫ1 ,ǫm
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
Dǫm ,n
Dǫm ,ǫ1
···
(19)
Dǫm ,ǫm
where each block Di,j ∈ [0, +∞)(m+n)×(m+n) defines the cost of assigning i and j of V1ǫ
to respectively k and l for all k, l ∈ V2ǫ , i.e. [Di,j ]k,l = dik,jl . Remark that blocks Di,j are
organized in four main blocks corresponding to the nature of nodes i and j (dummy nodes
or not). Each block Di,j is itself decomposed into four blocks as follows:
i,j
D
=
j1 · · · jm
jǫ1 · · · jǫn
Di,j
1,1
Di,j
1,2
Di,j
2,1
Di,j
2,2
i1
.
..
im
iǫ1
.
.
.
iǫn
(20)
m×m
m×n
n×m
n×n
where Di,j
, Di,j
, Di,j
and Di,j
.
1,1 ∈ [0, +∞)
1,2 ∈ [0, +∞)
2,1 ∈ [0, +∞)
2,2 ∈ [0, +∞)
The different values taken by the elements of D, depending on the values of the indices,
are reported in Table 1.
19
nodes in V2ǫ
case
block
1
Di,j
1,1
k, l
2
Di,j
1,2
3
Di,j
2,1
4
Di,j
2,2
5
l
Di,ǫ
1,1
6
l
Di,ǫ
1,2
7
l
Di,ǫ
2,1
8
l
Di,ǫ
2,2
9
k ,j
Dǫ1,1
10
k ,j
Dǫ1,2
11
k ,j
Dǫ2,1
12
k ,j
Dǫ2,2
13
k ,ǫl
Dǫ1,1
14
k ,ǫl
Dǫ1,2
15
k ,ǫl
Dǫ2,1
16
k ,ǫl
Dǫ2,2
k, ǫj
else
ǫi , l
else
ǫi , ǫj
else
k, l
else
k, ǫ
ǫi , l
else
ǫi , ǫ
else
k, l
else
k, ǫj
else
ǫ, l
ǫ, ǫj
else
k, l
else
k, ǫ
else
ǫ, l
else
ǫ, ǫ
d(i,j),(k,l)
ces ((i, j) → (k, l))δ(i,j)∈E1 δ(k,l)∈E2 +
ced (i, j)δ(i,j)∈E1 (1 − δ(k,l)∈E2 ) +
cei (k, l)(1 − δ(i,j)∈E1 )δ(k,l)∈E2
ced (i, j)δ(i,j)∈E1
ω
ced (i, j)δ(i,j)∈E1
ω
ced (i, j)δ(i,j)∈E1
ω
cei (k, l)δ(k,l)∈E2
ω
0
0
ω
0
ω
cei (k, l) δ(k,l)∈E2
ω
0
ω
0
0
ω
cei (k, l) δ(k,l)∈E2
ω
0
ω
0
ω
0
Table 1: Elements of matrix D according to the configuration of its indices. We consider
that i, j ∈ V1 , k, l ∈ V2 , ǫk , ǫl ∈ E1 , and ǫi , ǫj ∈ E2 . Epsilon values without indices mean any
ǫ-value.
Proposition 7 If both G1 and G2 are undirected, then:
∀(i, k, j, l) ∈ V1ǫ × V2ǫ × V1ǫ × V2ǫ , dik,jl = djl,ik .
Proof: If both G1 and G2
and :
ces ((i, j) → (k, l))
ced (i, j)
cei (k, l)
are undirected, then δ(i,j)∈E1 = δ(j,i)∈E1 , δ(k,l)∈E2 = δ(l,k)∈E2
= ces ((j, i) → (l, k))
= ced (j, i)
= cei (l, k)
Hence if none of i, j, k or l are equal to ǫ, the first line of Table 1 remains unchanged.
Moreover, if ǫ ∈ {i, j, k, l}, then permuting indices (i, k) and (j, l) leads to the following
permutations of the lines of Table 1 (after the appropriate renaming of variables):
(2, 3)(4)(5, 9)(6, 11)(7, 10)(8, 12)(13)(14, 15)(16)
One can check that in each case dik,jl = djl,ik .
Remark 2 If the rows of matrix D correspond to (i, k) and the columns to (j, l), then
under the hypothesis of Proposition 7, D is symmetric and we get DT = D.
20
To fully represent edit operations we also need to consider the ones performed on nodes.
This can be measured by the linear sum cT x defined in Section 3.2, where c = vec(C) ∈
2
[0, +∞)(n+m) represents the cost of edit operations on nodes (Eq. 12):
csub
i,k = cvs (i → k)
(
cvd (i) if k = i
rem
ci,k =
ω
else
(
cvi (k) if i = k
cins
i,k =
ω
else
4.2
(21)
QAP for ǫ-assignments, restricted edit paths and GED
According to the following result, summing the quadratic and the linear costs defined above
leads to the cost of a restricted edit path.
Proposition 8 Let ∆ = D if both G1 and G2 are undirected and ∆ = D + DT else.
Note that using Proposition 7, ∆ is symmetric. Any non-infinite value of 12 xT ∆x + cT x
corresponds to the cost of a minimal edit path. Conversely the cost of any minimal edit
path may be written as 12 xT ∆x + cT x with the appropriate x.
Proof: If 12 xT ∆x + cT x is not infinite, x corresponds to a matrix of assignment (Definition 10). Hence by propositions 6 and 4, there is a unique restricted edit path P such
that P and x correspond to the same injective function ϕ from a subset V̂1 of V1 onto V2 .
The edit path P substitutes each node v, belonging to V̂1 onto ϕ(v), removes all nodes
belonging to V1 \ V̂1 and insert all nodes belonging to V2 \ ϕ[V̂1 ] (Proposition 6).
Consider the notations of the proof of Proposition 6, i.e. the matrix X = (Q, R, S, T)
defining x. The three first blocks are defined as: qi,ϕ(i) = 1 for any i ∈ V̂1 , ri,i = 1 for any
i ∈ V1 \ V̂1 and sj,j = 1 for any j ∈ V2 \ ϕ[V̂1 ]. These blocks are filled with 0 outside these
indices (Proposition 4).
Let us decompose the cost γ(P ) of P into a cost γv (P ) related to operations on nodes
and a cost γe (P ) related on operation on edges:
γ(P ) = γv (P ) + γe (P )
We have according to corollary 1:
X
X
γv (P ) =
cvd (v) +
cvs (v) +
v∈V1 \V̂1
v∈V̂1
X
cvi (v)
v∈V2 \V̂2
On the other hand, let us denote by Csub , Crem and Cins the blocks corresponding to
(Q, R, S) in the cost matrix C defining c (Section 3.2). The term cT x is equal to:
T
c x=
n X
m
X
csub
i,j qi,j
i=1 j=1
=
X
i∈V̂1
=
X
i∈V̂1
csub
i,ϕ(i) +
+
n X
n
X
crem
i,j ri,j
+
crem
i,i +
i∈V1 \V̂1
cvs (i → ϕ(i)) +
cins
i,j si,j
i=1 j=1
i=1 j=1
X
m X
m
X
X
cins
j,j
j∈V2 \ϕ[V̂1 ]
X
cvd (i) +
i∈V1 \V̂1
X
cvi (j)
j∈V2 \ϕ[V̂1 ]
The first line takes into account that the block corresponding to T in matrix C is equal to
0. Thus, this block does not play any role in the computation of cT x. The last line is due
to the definition of the remaining blocks of C (equation 21).
21
We have thus γv (P ) = cT x. Let us show that γe (P ) = 21 xT ∆x. We have:
n X
m
n X
m
m X
n
X
X
X
X
T
dik,jl si,k
x D jl =
dik,jl xik =
dik,jl qi,k +
dik,jl ri,k +
i,k
=
n X
m
X
dik,jl qi,k +
i=1 k=1
=
X
i=1 k=1
n
X
i=1 k=1
diǫ,jl ri,i +
i=1
diϕ(i),jl +
X
k=1 i=1
dǫk,jl sk,k
k=1
X
diǫ,jl +
dǫk,jl
k∈V2 \V̂2
i∈V1 \V̂1
i∈V̂1
m
X
where Vˆ2 = ϕ[V̂1 ] (Proposition 5). In the same way we have:
X
X
X
X
xT Dx =
xT D jl xjl =
xT D jϕ(j) +
xT D jǫ +
xT D ǫl
j,l
j∈V1 \V̂1
j∈V̂1
l∈V2 \V̂2
We have:
X
X X
X
xT D jϕ(j) =
diϕ(i),jϕ(j) +
diǫ,jϕ(j) +
j∈V̂1
j∈V̂1
=
i∈V1 \V̂1
i∈V̂1
X
diϕ(i),jϕ(j) +
(i,j)∈V̂12
X
xT D jǫ =
j∈V1 \V̂1
X
X
j∈V1 \V̂1
k∈V2 \V̂2
ced (i, j) +
(i,j)∈E1 ∩(V1 \V̂1 )×V̂1
X
diϕ(i),jǫ +
X
dǫk,jϕ(j)
X
cei (k, l)
(k,l)∈E2 ∩(V2 \V̂2 )×V̂2
X
diǫ,jǫ +
i∈V1 \V̂1
i∈V̂1
X
=
X
k∈V2 \V̂2
ced (i, j)
dǫk,jǫ
(i,j)∈E1 ∩V1 ×(V1 \V̂1 )
X
l∈V2 \V̂2
xT D ǫl =
X
l∈V2 \V̂2
=
X
diϕ(i),ǫl +
diǫ,ǫl +
X
k∈V2 \V̂2
i∈V1 \V̂1
i∈V̂1
X
X
cei (k, l)
dǫk,ǫl
(k,l)∈E2 ∩V2 ×(V2 \V̂2 )
where all substitutions of dij,kl by the corresponding removal or insertion costs are deduced
from Table 1.
Moreover, we have, using the notations of Proposition 5:
2
=
{(i, j) ∈ Vˆ1 | δ(i,j)∈E1 = δ(ϕ(i),ϕ(j))∈E2 = 1}
2
ˆ
=
{(i, j) ∈ V1 | δ(i,j)∈E1 = 1, δ(ϕ(i),ϕ(j))∈E2 = 0}
2
{(k, l) ∈ Vˆ2 | δ(ϕ−1 (k),ϕ−1 (l))∈E1 = 0, δ(k,l)∈E2 = 1} =
Hence:
X X
diϕ(i),jϕ(j) =
j∈V̂1 i∈V̂1
X
ces ((i, j) → (ϕ(i), ϕ(j)))+
X
Ê1
R12
I21
ced (i, j)+
(i,j)∈R12
(i,j)∈Ê1
X
cei (k, l)
(k,l)∈I21
Moreover we have:
(V1 \ Vˆ1 ) × Vˆ1 ∪ V1 × (V1 \ Vˆ1 ) = (V1 \ Vˆ1 ) × V1 ∪ V1 × (V1 \ Vˆ1 )
Indeed:
(V1 \ Vˆ1 ) × V1 ∪ V1 × (V1 \ Vˆ1 ) =
=
(V1 \ Vˆ1 ) × Vˆ1 ∪ (V1 \ Vˆ1 ) × (V1 \ Vˆ1 ) ∪ V1 × (V1 \ Vˆ1 )
(V1 \ Vˆ1 ) × Vˆ1 ∪ V1 × (V1 \ Vˆ1 )
22
Hence by grouping appropriate terms we get:
X
xT Dx =
ces ((i, j) → (ϕ(i), ϕ(j)))
(i,j)∈Ê1
+
X
ced (i, j)
(i,j)∈E1 ∩((V1 \Vˆ1 )×V1 ∪V1 ×(V1 \Vˆ1 ))∪R12
Using Proposition 5 we finally get:
X
ces ((i, j) → (ϕ(i), ϕ(j))) +
xT Dx =
(i,j)∈Ê1
X
+
cei (k, l)
(k,l)∈E2 ∩((V2 \Vˆ2 )×V2 ∪V2 ×(V2 \Vˆ2 ))∪I21
X
ced (i, j) +
(i,j)∈E1 \Eˆ1
X
cei (k, l)
(k,l)∈E2 \Eˆ2
Using Corollary 1 if both G1 and G2 are directed we get γe (P ) = xT Dx. However in this
case:
1 T
1 T
1 T
1
x Dx + xT DT x =
x Dx + xT Dx = xT Dx
x ∆x = xT D + DT x =
2
2
2
2
Hence γe (P ) = 12 xT ∆x.
Using Remark 1 we get γe (P ) = 12 xT Dx = 21 xT ∆x if both G1 and G2 are undirected.
Thus γ(P ) = 21 xT ∆x + cT x with ∆ = D if both G1 and G2 are undirected and
∆ = D + DT else.
Hence, the determination of a restricted edit path with a minimal cost is equivalent to
searching for an optimal ǫ-assignment
1 T
T
∼
x̂ ∈ argmin
x ∆x + c x | x ∈ vec[An,m ]
(22)
2
In other terms, for the class of graphs under consideration, i.e. simple graphs, we have
1 T
x ∆x + cT x | x ∈ vec[A∼
]
(23)
GED(G1 , G2 ) = min
n,m
2
This is a QAP, see [18, 4] for more details on QAPs. In particular, QAPs are NP-hard
and exact algorithms can solve QAPs of small size only. So, many heuristics able to find
suboptimal solutions in short computing time have been explored.
Remark 3 Note that the functional involved in the QAP defined by Eq. 22 can be rewritten
as a general quadratic term:
1 T
1
1
x ∆x + cT x = xT ∆x + xT diag(c)x = xT
∆ + diag(c) x
(24)
2
2
2
where diag(c) is the diagonal matrix with c as diagonal. So the GED can be equivalently
defined by
(25)
GED(G1 , G2 ) = min xT ∆x | x ∈ vec[A∼
n,m ]
where ∆ = 21 ∆ + diag(c) represents the cost of both node and edge edit operations. As graphs
are simple, they have no self-loops and then the diagonal elements of ∆ are all equal to 0.
So the diagonal of ∆ is always equal to c.
5
Solving QAPs with the Integer Projected Fixed Point
Algorithm
We propose to compute an approximate GED by finding a solution of the QAP defined by
Eq. 22, and rewritten here as the following binary quadratic programming problem:
def. 1 T
T
n
(26)
argmin S(x) = x ∆x + c x | Ax = 1n , x ∈ {0, 1}
2
23
where Ax = 1n , with x ∈ {0, 1}n and A ∈ {0, 1}n×n, is the matrix version of the bijectivity
constraints given by Eq. 3, see [4, 34] for more details. Also, we suppose that c ∈ [0, +∞)n ,
and ∆ ∈ [0, +∞)n×n is assumed to be symmetric. Note that Eq. 22 is equivalent to Eq. 26,
with additional constraints on x (Eq. 11) imposed by ω values in the expression of ∆
(Eq. 18 and Proposition 8) and c (Eq. 21).
QAPs are generally NP-hard, which depends on the structure of the cost matrix
∆ = 12 ∆ + diag(c) (see previous section), and so most algorithms find approximate local or
global optimal solutions by relaxing the bijectivity constraints on the solution, which leads
to find a continuous solution instead of a discrete one:
argmin {S(x) | Ax = 1, x ∈ [0, +∞)n } .
(27)
While this relaxed problem is also NP-hard, several polynomial-time algorithms have been
designed to converge close to a local or global solution in a short computing time. The
ones based on linearization of the cost function S are known to be particularly efficient.
They transform the relaxed problem into a sequence of convex problems, such that a given
initial solution is improved iteratively by decreasing the cost function up to a fixed point.
Then, the final continuous solution is binarized and used as a solution of the QAP. But as
shown experimentally in [20] in the context of graph matching, the continuous optimum
is not necessarily close to the global discrete optimum. To try to overcome this problem,
it seems to be more efficient to try to find a discrete solution as close as possible to a
continuous one, at each iteration, as done by Sof-Assign [11, 12, 13] or Integer Projected
Fixed Point (IPFP) [20].
We present here an adaptation of the IPFP algorithm, originally proposed for maximization of a quadratic term [20], to minimization. We also improve the computational
complexity of several steps of the algorithm.
Given an initial continuous (or discrete) candidate solution x0 , The idea of [20] is to
iteratively improve (here reduce) the corresponding quadratic cost in two steps at each
iteration:
1. Compute a discrete linear approximation bk+1 of the quadratic cost S around the
current solution xk by solving a LSAP.
2. Compute the next candidate solution xk+1 by solving the relaxed problem, reduced
to compute the extremum of S between xk and bk+1 included.
The iteration of these steps converges to an optimum of the relaxed problem, which is
either continuous or discrete but generally not the global one. This last point depends on
the initialization. The whole process is detailed in Algorithm 5.
At each iteration, in the first step, the cost S is linearly approximated. The differential
of S in xk in the direction h is given by:
DS(xk ) · h = xTk ∆h + cT h
(since ∆ is symmetric).
Hence the first-order Taylor expansion of S around the current solution xk is given by:
S(b) ≈ S(xk ) + xTk ∆ + cT (b − xk )
(28)
≈ S(xk ) + R(b) − R(xk )
where R(x) = (xTk ∆ + cT )x and b ≥ 0. Keeping xk fixed, S(xk ) and R(xk ) are constant,
and so the minimization of S(b) is approximatively equivalent to the minimization of R(b):
bk+1 ∈ argmin xTk ∆ + cT b | Ab = 1, b ≥ 0n .
(29)
This is a linear programming problem with totally unimodular constraint matrix A and
the right-hand side vector of the linear system Ab = 1 is integer valued. So, by standard
tools in linear programming, there is an integer optimal solution, here binary and equal to
the solution of the LSAP [34, 4]
(30)
bk+1 ∈ argmin xTk ∆ + cT b | Ab = 1, b ∈ {0, 1}n×n .
24
Algorithm 1
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
16:
17:
18:
19:
20:
21:
22:
IPFPmin(x0 , c, ∆, kmax )
k ← 0, L ← cT x0 , Sk ← 12 xT0 ∆x0 + L
repeat
// Projection of the cost by solving a LSAP
bk+1 ← argmin{(xTk ∆ + cT )b | b ∈ A∼
n,m }
// Minimize the quadratic cost along the direction bk+1
L′ ← cT bk+1
Sbk+1 ← 12 bTk+1 ∆bk+1 + L′
α ← R(bk+1 ) − 2Sk + L
β ← Sbk+1 + Sk − R(bk+1 ) − L
t0 ← −α/(2β)
if (β ≤ 0) ∨ (t0 ≥ 1) then
xk+1 ← bk+1 , Sk+1 ← Sbk+1 , L ← L′
else
xk+1 ← xk + t0 (bk+1 − xk )
Sk+1 ← Sk − α2 /(4β)
L ← cT xk+1
end if
k ←k+1
until (xk+1 = xk ) ∨ (k ≥ kmax )
if xk+1 = bk+1 then return (xk+1 , Sk+1 )
xk+1 ← argmin{xTk+1 b | b ∈ A∼
n,m }
return (xk+1 , Sk+1 )
In our experiments, this problem is solved by the O(n3 ) version of the Hungarian algorithm
[19, 4], modified such that forbidden assignments represented by ω values in ∆ and c are
not treated. The resulting assignment bk+1 determines a direction of largest possible
decrease of S in the first-order approximation. Let us additionally note that the first order
approximation of S(b) is lower than S(xk ) since R(bk+1 ) ≤ R(xk ). However we cannot
yet conclude since this is only an approximation.
The second step of each iteration of Algorithm 5 consists in minimizing the quadratic
function S in the continuous domain along the direction given by bk+1 . This can be
done analytically. Let xt = xk + t(bk+1 − xk ), with t ∈ [0, 1], be a parameterization of the
segment between xk and bk+1 . The evolution of S on this segment is provided by:
S(xt ) = S(xk + t(bk+1 − xk ))
= 21 [xk + t(bk+1 − xk )]T ∆[xk + t(bk+1 − xk )] + cT [xk + t(bk+1 − xk )]
= 21 xTk ∆xk + cT xk + txTk ∆(bk+1 − xk ) + 21 t2 (bk+1 − xk )T ∆(bk+1 − xk )
+ tcT (bk+1 − xk )
= S(xk ) + t[xTk ∆(bk+1 − xk ) + cT (bk+1 − xk )] + 21 t2 (bk+1 − xk )T ∆(bk+1 − xk )
= S(xk ) + tR(bk+1 − xk ) + 21 t2 (bk+1 − xk )T ∆(bk+1 − xk )
= S(xk ) + αt + βt2
where
α = R(bk+1 − xk ) = R(bk+1 ) − R(xk ) ≤ 0
= R(bk+1 ) − xTk ∆xk − cT xk = R(bk+1 ) − 2( 21 xTk ∆xk + cT xk ) + cT xk
= R(bk+1 ) − 2S(xk ) + cT xk
β = 12 (bk+1 − xk )T ∆(bk+1 − xk )
= 21 bTk+1 ∆bk+1 − xTk ∆bk+1 + 21 xTk ∆xk
= 12 bTk+1 ∆bk+1 + cT bk+1 − R(bk+1 ) + 12 xTk ∆xk
= S(bk+1 ) + S(xk ) − R(bk+1 ) − cT xk
25
1
1
S(xt )
1
S(xt )
S(xt )
S(xt0 )
t
1
(a) β ≥ 0, t0 ≤ 1
t
t
1
(b) β ≥ 0, t0 ≥ 1
1
(c) β < 0
Figure 2: Illustration of the 3 cases relating β and t0 .
The main advantage of the above expression for the calculation of α, and not used in
the original algorithm [20], is that R(bk+1 ) is already computed by the LSAP algorithm
that computes bk+1 . Moreover S(xk ) and cT xk may be stored from the previous iteration
of the algorithm. Note that since α = R(bk+1 ) − R(xk ) we have α ≤ 0. For β, the
improvement is a bit more tedious. We have indeed to compute S(bk+1 ). Hence the gain
is not obvious compared to the direct computation of (bk+1 − xk )T ∆(bk+1 − xk ) as done
in the original algorithm [20]. Note however that S(bk+1 ) will also be used in a following
step, so computations are factorized. The problem is thus transformed into finding the
optimal value
t0 = argmin S(xt ) = S(xk ) + αt + βt2 | t ∈ [0, 1] .
(31)
The derivative of S(xt ) cancels at t0 = −α/(2β). Then as shown in Fig. 2, we have:
• If β > 0
– If t0 ≤ 1, S(xt0 ) is the minimum of S(xt ), in particular it is lower than S(xk )
and S(bk+1 ). Moreover:
S(xt0 ) = S(xk ) −
α2
α2
α2
+
= S(xk ) −
2β
4β
4β
– If t0 ≥ 1, then S ′ (xt ) < 0 ∀t ∈ [0, 1], and the minimal value of S(xt ) is S(x1 ) =
S(bk+1 ).
• If β ≤ 0, since α ≤ 0, S(xt ) decreases between t = 0 and t = 1. Its minimal value is
thus S(x1 ) = S(bk+1 ).
So, if either β < 0 or β > 0, but t0 ≥ 1, the minima of S(xt ) within the range t ∈ [0, 1] is
obtained for t0 = 1, i.e. xt0 = bk+1 (lines 11-12). Note that in this case the new solution is
discrete. In the remaining case (lines 13-16), S(xt ) passes by a minimal value lower than
S(xk ) and S(bk+1 ). In both cases xt0 is taken as the solution xk+1 for the next iteration.
Hence, as in the original algorithm [20], S(xk ) decreases at each iteration, and since ∆ and
c are positive, S is bounded bellow 0 and the algorithm converges.
The whole process is iterated until a fixed point is reached, in which case xk+1 is
ensured to be a minimum of the relaxed problem defined by Eq. 27. When a minimum
of the original problem defined by Eq. 26 is requested as for the GED, the discrete vector
closest to the minimum of the relaxed problem is selected. Note that the method [15]
does not guarantee the solution to be binary. The minimum of the relaxed problem is not
guaranteed to be global. This depends on the initial vector x0 , which influences both the
value of the resulting cost and the number of iterations required to reach the convergence.
For the approximation of the GED, we have tested several initializations based on the
LSAP, as described in the following section. We have observed that the exact GED is
often obtained, meaning that the optimal solution of the original problem can be reached
by the algorithm.
26
Table 2: Characteristics of the four GREYC’s chemistry datasets.
Dataset
Alkane
Acyclic
M AO
P AH
Number of graphs
150
183
68
94
Avg Size
8.9
8.2
18.4
20.7
Avg Degree
1.8
1.8
2.1
2.4
Table 3: Accuracy and complexity scores. d is the average edit distance, e the average
error and t the average computational time.
Algorithm
A∗
[26]
[10]
[5]
IP F PRandom init
IP F Pinit [26]
IP F PInit [10]
6
d
Alkane
e
t
15
35
33
26
22.6
22.4
20.5
18
18
11
7.1
7.0
5
1.29
≃ 10−3
≃ 10−3
2.27
0.007
0.007
0.006
d
Acyclic
e
t
17
35
31
28
23.4
22.6
20.7
18
14
9
6.1
5.3
3.4
6.02
≃ 10−3
≃ 10−2
0.73
0.006
0.006
0.005
d
105
49
44
65.2
59
33.6
MAO
t
≃ 10−3
≃ 10−2
6.16
0.031
0.031
0.016
d
138
120
129
63
62.2
52.5
PAH
t
≃ 10−3
≃ 10−2
2.01
0.04
0.04
0.037
Experiments
In this section, we present some experimentation results to show the effectiveness of our
quadratic assignment approach with respect to the ones based on LSAPs. To this purpose,
we compare our approach to three methods based on the LSAP and one method to compute
the exact graph edit distance based on A∗ algorithm. The latter method is used as a
baseline to measure the error induced by approximations. However, A∗ is restricted to
very simple graphs and it wasn’t possible to compute exact graph edit distances for two
over the four used datasets. The three LSAP methods, i.e. bipartite GEDs, are the ones
proposed in [26, 10, 5]. They differ on the definition of the cost between elements, as
already discussed.
The experiments have been performed on four chemoinformatics datasets1 (see Table 2
for their characteristics) plus one synthetic dataset to test larger graphs. The variety of
these datasets allows to see the behavior of different approaches on four kind of graphs:
acyclic labeled (Acyclic), acyclic not labeled (Alkane), cyclic labeled (MAO), cyclic not
labeled (PAH). Finally, the synthetic dataset is composed of graphs having same characteristics as the ones in MAO dataset but extended up to 100 nodes (details bellow).
Table 3 shows the results of our experiments on the four GREYC’s datasets. Note that,
in order to avoid some bias, these results have been computed using random permutations of
the adjacency matrices before computing graph edit distances. Moreover, all experiments
have been computed on the same machine, hence providing comparable computational
times. In order to show the relevancy of our proposal, we compute the average edit distance
(d), the average approximation error (e) with respect to the exact graph edit distance and
the average computational time (t) required to get the graph edit distance for a pair of
graphs. For these three measures, lower values correspond to better results. Indeed, since
approximation approaches overestimate graph edit distance, a lower average edit distance
can be considered as better than an higher one. Due to the computational complexity
required by A* algorithm, the exact graph edit distance has not been computed on PAH
and MAO datasets which are composed of larger graphs than the ones in Acyclic and
Alkane datasets.
IPFP approach allows to drastically improve the accuracy of the approximation with
respect to LSAP approaches while keeping a reasonable computational time. This observation can be made on the four datasets, hence showing the consistency of this QAP
approach.
Results shown in Table 3 also highlight the importance of the initialization step. Since
1 Available
at https://brunl01.users.greyc.fr/CHEMISTRY/
27
4
100
Percentage of perfect approximation
time (s)
mean error
3.5
2.5
50
2
percentage
time, average error
3
1.5
1
0.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Figure 3: Analysis of complexity on a synthetic dataset.
the functional of QAP formulation is not convex, different initializations can lead to different local minima. Obviously, initializations close to the global minimum have an higher
probability to reach it than initializations far from it. This behavior is observed in the
results where better approximations are obtained by using the approach giving the best
approximation considering LSAP framework. Moreover, less iterations are required to
reach convergence since the algorithm is initialized close to the minima. This phenomenon
explains the low differences of computational time between the different approaches. Note
that we didn’t test the method presented in [5] due to its high computational time. In conclusion, these results show that the QAP approach is a relevant approach to approximate
graph edit distance and outperforms methods based on LSAP formulation while keeping
an interesting computational time with respect to the one required to compute an exact
graph edit distance.
Figure 3 shows how our IPFP approach scales with the size of graphs. This results have
been computed on a synthetic dataset having same node’s and edge’s labels distribution
and same ratio between the number of edges and the number of nodes as MAO dataset but
generalized to different graph sizes. For a given number of nodes, a synthetic dataset is
composed of 100 pairs of source and target graphs. Each target graph has been generated
by removing one node and substituting another one from the associated source graph. The
overall edit distance between source and target graphs is then defined by the cost associated
to this two node operations together with the induced edit operations on edges. The graph
edit distance between each pair of graphs is around 10. Given this protocol, we generated
a synthetic dataset composed of 100 couples of graphs for different graph’s sizes, hence
obtaining 10 datasets from 10 to 100 nodes.
In Figure 3, the dashed green line corresponds to the computational time required to
compute an approximation of the graph edit distance, the plain blue line to the average
approximation error and the dotted red line corresponds to the percentage of pairs for
which the exact graph edit distance is computed using IPFP. The x axis corresponds to
the size of the graphs. The y axis on the left of Figure 3 represents simultaneously the
mean execution times and the average error using a same scaling. Hence, for example,
0.5 should be read as 0.5 seconds on the dashed green line and as an average error of 0.5
28
on the plain blue curve. The y axis on the right corresponds to the percentage of exact
graph edit distances computed by our algorithm and should be used for the analysis of the
dotted red curve. As we can see, the accuracy of the approximation using IPFP is stable
for all tested sizes. The average error for each dataset remains about 5 to 10 % of the exact
graph edit distance which corresponds to a good approximation. Moreover, the percentage
of perfect approximation shows that we are able to compute the exact graph edit distance
for 75% to 91% pairs of graphs. From a computational point of view, the curve seems to
describe a polynomial function with respect to the size of graphs. Considering a bounded
number of iterations, this observation is conform with the cubic complexity associated to
the algorithm used to resolve LSAP problems, which is used in each iteration of the IPFP
algorithm.
7
Conclusion
We have in this paper characterized the solutions of some LSAP and QAP as edit paths
belonging to a certain family. This characterization has allowed us to solve the graph edit
distance problem through a QAP with a clear definition of the family of edit paths implied
in the minimization process.
The proposed algorithm used to solve the QAP usually provides a permutation matrix,
and hence a value which can be directly interpreted as an approximation of the GED. If
the final matrix is only stochastic, we simply project it on the set of permutation matrices
in order to obtain the desired value.
Our experiments show that the proposed algorithm usually find values quite close from
the optimal solutions within computational times which allow to apply it on graphs of non
trivial sizes. These experiments also show the importance of the initialization step since a
good initialization both improves the final result and reduces the number of iterations.
Our further works should investigate different directions: the initialization step, the
removal within our algorithm of the different instances of ǫ values and finally the definition of alternative QAP solvers. Such improvements should allow in a near future to
compute efficiently close approximations of the graph edit distance on graphs composed of
a thousand of nodes.
References
[1] H. Bunke. On a relation between graph edit distance and maximum common subgraph. Pattern
Recognition Letters, 18:689–694, 1997.
[2] H Bunke. Error correcting graph matching: on the influence of the underlying cost function. IEEE
Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(9):917–922, 1999.
[3] H. Bunke and G. Allermann. Inexact graph matching for structural pattern recognition. Pattern
Recognition Letters, 1(4):245–253, 1983.
[4] R. Burkard, M. Dell’Amico, and S. Martello. Assignment Problems. SIAM, 2009.
[5] V. Carletti, B. Gaüzère, L. Brun, and M. Vento. Approximate graph edit distance computation
combining bipartite matching and exact neighborhood substructure distance. In Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition, volume 9069 of LNCS, pages 168–177. 2015.
[6] D. Conte, P. Foggia, C. Sansone, and M. Vento. Thirty years of graph matching in Pattern Recognition.
International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 18(3):265–298, 2004.
[7] S. Fankhauser, K. Riesen, and H. Bunke. Speeding up graph edit distance computation through fast
bipartite matching. In Graph-based Representations in Pattern Recognition, volume 6658 of LNCS,
pages 102–111. 2011.
[8] M. Ferrer, F. Serratosa, and K. Riesen. A First Step Towards Exact Graph Edit Distance Using
Bipartite Graph Matching. In Graph Based Representations in Pattern Recognition, volume 9069 of
LNCS, pages 77–86. 2015.
[9] P. Foggia, G. Percannella, and M. Vento. Graph matching and learning in pattern recognition on the
last ten years. Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 28(1), 2014.
[10] B. Gaüzère, S. Bougleux, K. Riesen, and L. Brun. Approximate Graph Edit Distance Guided by
Bipartite Matching of Bags of Walks. In Structural, Syntactic and Statistical Pattern Recognition,
volume 8621 of LNCS, pages 73–82. Springer, 2014.
[11] S. Gold, E. Mjolsness, and A. Rangarajan. Clustering with a domain-specific distance measure.
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 6:96–103, 1994.
29
[12] S. Gold and A. Rangarajan. A graduated assignment algorithm for graph matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(4):377–388, 1996.
[13] S. Gold and A. Rangarajan. Softmax to softassign: Neural network algorithms for combinatorial
optimization. Journal of Artificial Neural Networks, 2(4):381–399, 1996.
[14] R. Jonker and A. Volgenant. A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear
assignment problems. Computing, 38(4):325–340, 1987.
[15] D. Justice and A. Hero. A binary linear programming formulation of the graph edit distance. IEEE
Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 28(8):1200–1214, 2006.
[16] T.C. Koopmans and M. Beckmann. Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities.
Econometrica, 25(1):53–76, 1957.
[17] H. W. Kuhn. The hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,
2(1-2):83–97, 1955.
[18] E. L. Lawler. The quadratic assignment problem. Management Science, 9(4):586–599, 1963.
[19] E. L. Lawler. Combinatorial Optimization: Networks and Matroids. Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
New York, 1976.
[20] M. Leordeanu, M. Hebert, and R. Sukthankar. An integer projected fixed point method for graph
matching and map inference. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 22,
pages 1114–1122. 2009.
[21] C. Lin. Hardness of approximating graph transformation problem. In 5th Annual International
Symposium on Algorithms and Computation, volume 834 of LNCS, pages 74–82. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 1994.
[22] Z. Y. Liu and H. Qiao. GNCCP - Graduated Nonconvexity and concavity procedure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36(6):1258–1267, 2014.
[23] E. M. Loiola, N. M. M. de Abreu, P. O. Boaventura-Netto, P. Hahn, and T. Querido. A survey for
the quadratic assignment problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 176:657–690, 2007.
[24] J. Munkres. Algorithms gor the assignment and trasportation problems. Journal of the Society for
Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 5:32–38, 1957.
[25] M. Neuhaus and H. Bunke. A quadratic programming approach to the graph edit distance problem.
In Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition, volume 4538 of LNCS, pages 92–102. 2007.
[26] K. Riesen and H. Bunke. Approximate graph edit distance computation by means of bipartite graph
matching. Image and Vision Computing, 27:950–959, 2009.
[27] K. Riesen and H. Bunke. Improving bipartite graph edit distance approximation using various search
strategies. Pattern Recognition, 28(4):1349–1363, 2015.
[28] K. Riesen, A. Fischer, and H. Bunke. Combining Bipartite Graph Matching and Beam Search for
Graph Edit Distance Approximation. In Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition, volume
8774 of LNCS, pages 117–128, 2014.
[29] K. Riesen, A. Fischer, and H. Bunke. Improving approximate graph edit distance using genetic
algorithms. In Structural, Syntactic and Statistical Pattern Recognition, volume 8621 of LNCS, pages
63–72. Springer, 2014.
[30] K. Riesen, A. Fischer, and H. Bunke. Estimating graph edit distance using lower and upper bounds
of bipartite approximations. Int. J. Patt. Recogn. Artif. Intell., 29(2), 2015.
[31] K. Riesen, M. Neuhaus, and H. Bunke. Bipartite graph matching for computing the edit distance of
graphs. In Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition, volume 4538 of LNCS, pages 1–12.
2007.
[32] A. Sanfeliu and K.-S. Fu. A distance measure between attributed relational graphs for pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 13(3):353–362, 1983.
[33] F. Serratosa. Fast computation of Bipartite graph matching. Pattern Recognition Letters, 45:244–250,
2014.
[34] G. Sierksma. Linear and Integer Programming: Theory and Practice. Advances in Applied Mathematics. CRC Press, 2nd edition, 2001.
[35] W.-H. Tsai and K.-S. Fu. Error-correcting isomorphisms of attributed relational graphs for pattern
analysis. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9(12):757–768, 1979.
[36] M. Vento. A long trip in the charming world of graphs for pattern recognition. Pattern Recognition,
48(2):1–11, 2015.
[37] Z. Zeng, A. K. H. Tung, J. Wang, J. Feng, and L. Zhou. Comparing stars: On approximating graph
edit distance. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2(1):25–36, 2009.
30
| 8cs.DS
|
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
Michael Mendler
Faculty of Information Systems and Applied Computer Sciences
Bamberg University
[email protected]
In this paper we propose an algebra of synchronous scheduling interfaces which combines the expressiveness of Boolean algebra for logical and functional behaviour with the min-max-plus arithmetic
for quantifying the non-functional aspects of synchronous interfaces. The interface theory arises from
a realisability interpretation of intuitionistic modal logic (also known as Curry-Howard-Isomorphism
or propositions-as-types principle). The resulting algebra of interface types aims to provide a general
setting for specifying type-directed and compositional analyses of worst-case scheduling bounds.
It covers synchronous control flow under concurrent, multi-processing or multi-threading execution
and permits precise statements about exactness and coverage of the analyses supporting a variety
of abstractions. The paper illustrates the expressiveness of the algebra by way of some examples
taken from network flow problems, shortest-path, task scheduling and worst-case reaction times in
synchronous programming.
1
Introduction
The algebra discussed in this paper aims at the specification of behavioural interfaces under the execution
model of synchronous programming. Such interfaces abstract externally observable Boolean controls
for components activated under the regime of a global synchronous scheduler familiar from data-flow
oriented languages such as Lustre [11], Signal [8], Lucid Synchrone [24], or imperative control-flow
oriented languages such as Statecharts [12, 23], Esterel [5] and Quartz [25]. In this model computations
are coordinated under one or more global system clocks, which may be physical or logical. They divide
physical time into a sequence of discrete ticks, or instants. During each instant the synchronous components interact using broadcast signals, which can have one of two statuses, present or absent. These
signal statuses evolve monotonically as they are propagated through the system, generating the emission
or inhibition of further signals and computations. Under the synchrony hypothesis [10] it is assumed
that at each instant, outputs are synchronous with the inputs. In other words, computations take place
instantaneously and appear to happen at each tick “all at once.”
The synchrony hypothesis conveniently abstracts internal, possibly distributed computations into
atomic reactions, making signals appear almost like Boolean variables and (stateful) interfaces almost
like Mealy automata with Boolean labels. Unfortunately, this abstraction is not perfect, so that Boolean
algebra is insufficient. First, it is well-known [14, 20] that classical two-valued Boolean analysis is inadequate to handle the causality and compositionality problems associated with the synchrony hypothesis
adequately. E.g., Boolean algebra by itself cannot guarantee there are no races between signal presence
and absence, thus guaranteeing unique convergence after a finite number of signal propagation steps.
Some form of causality information needs to be preserved. Secondly, quite practically, in many applications we want to compute non-Boolean information about otherwise “instantaneous” control signals,
such as latency or worst-case reaction times, maximal throughput, earliest deadlines, or other quantitative information about the scheduling process. This provides one way to motivate the work reported
Benoı̂t Caillaud and Axel Legay (Eds.):
Foundations of Interface Technologies (FIT’10)
EPTCS 46, 2011, pp. 28–48, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.46.3
c Michael Mendler
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution License.
Michael Mendler
29
here, viz. the search for a fully abstract synchronisation algebra as an economic refinement of classical Boolean algebra in situations where Booleans are subject to synchronous schedules and quantitative
resource consumption.
Another motivation may be drawn from the arithmetical point of view. One of the challenges in
quantitative resource analysis is the clever interchange (distribution) of max, min and +. For instance,
consider the analysis of worst-case reaction times (WCRT). In its simplest form, given a weighted dependency graph, the WCRT is the maximum of all sums of paths delays, an expression of the form
max(∑i∈p1 di1 , ∑i∈p2 di2 , . . . , ∑i∈pn din ) where p j are execution paths of the system and di j the delay of
path segment i in path p j . As it happens, the number n of paths is exponential in the number of elementary nodes of a system. Practicable WCRT analyses therefore reduce the max-of-sums to the polynomial
complexity of sum-of-maxes (dynamic programming on dependency graphs) employing various forms
of dependency abstraction. For illustration, imagine two alternative path segments of length d1 , e1 sequentially followed by two alternative path segments of length d2 , e2 , respectively. The distribution
max(d1 + d2 , d1 + e2 , e1 + d2 , e1 + e2 ) = max(d1 , e1 ) + max(d2 , e2 ) for efficiently calculating the longest
possible path, is exact only if we have a full set of path combinations. In general, there will be dependencies ruling out certain paths, in which case sum-of-maxes obtains but conservative over-approximations.
E.g., assume the combination of d1 with e2 is infeasible. Then, the sum-of-maxes is not exact since
max(d1 , e1 ) + max(d2 , e2 ) ≥ max(d1 + d2 , e1 + d2 , e1 + e2 ). On the other hand, knowing the infeasibility of d1 + e2 we would rather compute max(d1 + d2 , e1 + max(d2 , e2 )) = max(d1 + d2 , e1 + d2 , e1 + e2 )
which eliminates one addition and thus is both exact and more efficient than the full conservative maxof-sums. The same applies to min-plus problems such as shortest path or network flow. In the former,
the efficient sum-of-mins is an under-approximation of the exact min-of-sums on all feasible paths. For
network flow the arithmetic is complicated further by the fact that min/max do not distribute over +, i.e.,
min(d, e1 + e2 ) 6= min(d, e1 ) + min(d, e2 ) which obstructs simple linear programming techniques.
The art of scheduling analysis consists in finding a judicious trade-off between merging paths early
in order to aggregate data on the one hand, and refining dependency paths by case analysis for the sake
of exactness, on the other hand. A scheduling algebra for practicable algorithms must be able to express
and control this trade-off. In this paper we present an interface theory which achieves this by coupling
resource weights d with logic formulas φ . A pair d : φ specifies the semantic meaning of d within
the control-flow of a program module. Logical operations on the formulas then go hand-in-hand with
arithmetic operations on resources. E.g., suppose a schedule activates control points X and Y with a cost
of d1 and d2 , respectively, expressed d1 : ◦X ∧ d2 : ◦Y . If the threads are resource concurrent then both
controls are jointly active within the maximum, i.e., max(d1 , d2 ) : ◦(X ∧ Y ). If we are only concerned
whether one of the controls is reached, then we take the minimum min(d1 , d2 ) : ◦(X ⊕Y ). If activations
of X and Y requires interleaving of resources, then we must use addition d1 + d2 : ◦(X ⊗Y ).
Our interface theory combines min-max-plus algebra (N∞ , min, max, +, 0, −∞, +∞), see e.g. [4], with
a refinement of Boolean algebra to reason about logical control-flow. It features two conjunctions ∧, ⊗ to
distinguish concurrent from multi-threading parallelism, two disjunctions ∨, ⊕ to separate external from
internal scheduling choices, respectively. A consequence of its constructive nature, our algebra replaces
classical negation by a weaker and more expressive pseudo-complement for which x = x and x + x = 1
are no longer tautologies. This turns Boolean into a so-called Heyting algebra. The work presented here
is an extension and adaptation of our earlier work on propositional stabilisation theory [21] which has
been developed to provide a semantic foundation for combinational timing analyses.
The plan for the paper is as follows: To start with, Sec. 2 lays out the syntactic and semantical groundwork for our interface type theory which is then studied in some more detail in Sec. 3. For compactness
we keep these theoretical Sections 2 and 3 fairly condensed, postponing examples to Secs. 4 and 5. In
30
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
the former, Sec. 4, we sketch applications to network flow, shortest path and task scheduling, while in
Sec. 5 we discuss the problem of WCRT analysis for Esterel-style synchronous processing. The paper
concludes in Sec. 6 with a discussion of related work.
2
Syntax and Semantics of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
Synchronous scheduling assumes that all dependencies in the control flow of a single instant are acyclic
and the propagation of control, for all threads, is a monotonic process in which each atomic control point
is only ever activated at most once. Let V be a set of signals, or control variables, which specify the
atomic control points in the interface of a synchronous module. An event is a subset E ⊆ V of control
variables. A synchronous activation sequence, or simply an activation, is a monotonically increasing
function σ ∈ n → 2V from n = {0, 1, . . . , n−1} into the set of events, i.e., σ (i) ⊆ σ ( j) for all 0 ≤ i ≤ j < n.
The length |σ | of σ is the number of events it contains, i.e., |σ | = n. The unique activation of length
0 = 0/ is called the empty activation, also denoted 0.
/
Activations model the monotonic process of signal propagation during one synchronous instant, i.e.,
between two ticks of the logical clock. They induce a Boolean valuation on the control variables in the
sense that A ∈ V may be considered “present” for the instant if A ∈ σ (i) for some 0 ≤ i < |σ | and “absent”
otherwise. In the former case, index i is the activation level for the presence of control A. In general, the
domain n over which an activation is defined acts as a discrete domain of quantifiable resources which
are consumed by control variables becoming active at different resource levels. In this way, activation
sequences give an operational understanding of truth values that is faithful to causality and resource
consumption. A canonical interpretation is the temporal reading: The length |σ | is the duration of the
synchronous instant, i.e., the overall reaction time, and A ∈ σ (i) means that A is activated, or is present
from micro-step i.
Definition 2.1 Let σ ∈ n → 2V be an activation.
• A sub-activation σ 0 ⊆ σ of σ is an activation σ 0 ∈ m → 2V such that there exists a strictly monotonic function f ∈ m → n with σ 0 (i) = σ ( f (i)) for all i ∈ m.
• We write σ = σ1 ∪ σ2 to express that sub-activations σ1 , σ2 ⊆ σ form an activation cover of σ ,
or an interleaving decomposition in the sense that each event is contained in σ1 or in σ2 , i.e.,
∀i ∈ |σ |. ∃ j = 1, 2. ∃k ∈ |σ j |. i = f j (k) where f j are the index embeddings of σ j , j = 1, 2.
• For every i ∈ N we define the shifted activation σ [i, :] : m → 2V , where m =d f { j | 0 ≤ j + i < n}
and σ [i, :]( j) =d f σ ( j + i).
A shifted activation is also a sub-activation, σ [i, :] ⊆ σ . We have σ [i, :] = 0/ if σ = 0/ or if i ≥ |σ |.
The shift operator is monotonic wrt sub-activations and antitonic wrt resource level, i.e., if σ 0 ⊆ σ and
0 ≤ i ≤ j then σ 0 [ j, :] ⊆ σ [i, :]. This depends on strict monotonicity of the index embedding in σ 0 ⊆ σ .
In order to model non-determinism (abstracting from internal parameters or external environment)
our interfaces are interpreted over subsets Σ of activation sequences, called (synchronous) schedules.
These schedules (of a program, a module, or any other program fragment) will be specified by a scheduling type φ generated by the logical operators
φ
::= A | true | false | φ ∧ φ | ¬φ | φ ⊃ φ | φ ∨ φ | φ ⊕ φ | φ ⊗ φ | ◦φ
generated from control variables A ∈ V. We will write Σ |= φ (σ |= φ ) to say that schedule Σ (activation σ )
satisfies the type φ . The semantics of types is formally defined below in Def. 2.2. As a type specification,
Michael Mendler
31
each control variable A ∈ V represents the guarantee that “A is active (the signal is present, the program
label has been traversed, the state is activated) in all activations of Σ”. The constant true is satisfied
by all schedules and false only by the empty schedule or the schedule which contains only the empty
activation. The type operators ¬, ⊃ are negation and implication. The operators ∨ and ⊕ are two
forms of logical disjunction to encode internal and external non-determinism and ∧, ⊗ are two forms
of logical conjunction related to true concurrency and interleaving concurrency, respectively. Finally,
◦ is the operator to express resource consumption. The usual bracketing conventions apply: The unary
operators ¬, ◦ have highest binding power, implication ⊃ binds most weakly and the multiplicatives ∧, ⊗
are stronger than the summations ∨, ⊕. Occasionally, bi-implication φ ≡ ψ is useful as an abbreviation
for (φ ⊃ ψ) ∧ (ψ ⊃ φ ). Also, we note that ¬φ is equivalent to φ ⊃ false.
A scheduling type φ by itself only captures the functional aspect of an interface. To get a full interface
we need to enrich types by resource information. To this end, we associate with every scheduling type φ
a set of scheduling bounds Bnd(φ ) recursively as follows:
Bnd(false) = 1
Bnd(true) = 1
Bnd(A) = 1
Bnd(¬φ ) = 1
Bnd(φ ∧ ψ) = Bnd(φ ) × Bnd(ψ)
Bnd(φ ⊕ ψ) = Bnd(φ ) × Bnd(ψ)
Bnd(◦φ ) = N∞ × Bnd(φ )
Bnd(φ ∨ ψ) = Bnd(φ ) + Bnd(ψ)
Bnd(φ ⊃ ψ) = Bnd(φ ) → Bnd(ψ)
Bnd(φ ⊗ ψ) = Bnd(φ ) × Bnd(ψ),
where 1 = {0} is a distinguished singleton set. Elements of the disjoint sum Bnd(φ ) + Bnd(ψ) are
presented as pairs (0, f ) where f ∈ Bnd(φ ) or (1, g) where g ∈ Bnd(ψ). The set Bnd(φ ) × Bnd(ψ) is the
Cartesian product of the sets Bnd(φ ) and Bnd(ψ) and Bnd(φ ) → Bnd(ψ) the set of total functions from
Bnd(φ ) to Bnd(ψ). Intuitively, an element f ∈ Bnd(φ ) may be seen as a form of generalised higher-order
resource matrix for schedules of shape φ .
Definition 2.2 A scheduling interface is a pair f : φ consisting of a scheduling type φ and a scheduling
bound f ∈ Bnd(φ ). An activation σ satisfies an interface f : φ , or satisfies the scheduling type φ with
bound f , written σ |= f : φ , according to the following inductive rules:
σ |= 0 : false
iff |σ | = 0, i.e., σ = 0/
σ |= 0 : true
iff always
σ |= 0 : A
iff ∀0 ≤ i < |σ | ⇒ A ∈ σ (i)
σ |= ( f , g) : φ ∧ ψ iff σ |= f : φ and σ |= g : ψ
σ |= (0, f ) : φ ∨ ψ iff σ |= f : φ
σ |= (1, g) : φ ∨ ψ iff σ |= g : ψ
σ |= ( f , g) : φ ⊕ ψ iff σ |= f : φ or σ |= g : ψ
σ |= f : φ ⊃ ψ
iff ∀σ 0 ⊆ σ . ∀g ∈ Bnd(φ ). (σ 0 |= g : φ ⇒ σ 0 |= f g : ψ)
σ |= (d, f ) : ◦φ
iff |σ | = 0 or ∃i ∈ N. 0 ≤ i ≤ d and σ [i, :] |= f : φ
σ |= ( f , g) : φ ⊗ ψ iff ∃σ1 , σ2 ⊆ σ . σ = σ1 ∪ σ2 and σ1 |= f : φ and σ2 |= g : ψ.
A schedule Σ satisfies φ with bound f , written Σ |= f : φ , if for all σ ∈ Σ, σ |= f : φ . A schedule satisfies
φ or is bounded for φ if there exists f ∈ Bnd(φ ) such that Σ |= f : φ .
The semantics Σ |= f : φ as formalised in Def. 2.2 is a ternary relation: It links schedules, types and
bounds. The symbol |= separates the behavioural model Σ from the formal interface f : φ . The latter,
in turn, combines a qualitative and a quantitative aspect. The type φ captures the causal relationships
between the control points and the bound f ∈ Bnd(φ ) refines this quantitatively by weaving in concrete
activation levels. The colon : is a binary connective which separates these concerns.
32
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
Proposition 2.3 σ |= f : φ and σ 0 ⊆ σ implies σ 0 |= f : φ . Moreover, |σ | = 0 implies σ |= f : φ .
Prop. 2.3 says that interfaces are inherited by sub-activations. This is natural since a sub-activation
selects a subset of events and thus (in general) contains more control variables with lower activation distances. The degenerated case is the empty activation which is inconsistent and thus satisfies all interfaces,
including the strongest specification 0 : false, viz. “everything is true with zero resource consumption”.
The most general way to use the semantic relation of Def. 2.2 is to consider the set of (typically
abstracted) activations for a given module P as a schedule ΣP , and then determine a suitable interface for
it. Any such f : φ with ΣP |= f : φ may be taken as a valid interface specification of P giving a quantified
behavioural guarantee for all activations σ ∈ ΣP under the given scheduling assumptions. Ideally, we are
interested in the best fitting or tightest interface, if such exists. To measure the relative strength of an
interface we employ Def. 2.2 to associate with every pair f : φ the schedule [[ f : φ ]] = { σ | σ |= f : φ }
which is the semantic meaning of the interface. Interfaces may then be compared naturally. The smaller
the set of associated activations [[ f : φ ]] the tighter is the interface f : φ . Formally, we write
f :φ g:ψ
if
[[ f : φ ]] ⊆ [[g : ψ]]
∼ g : ψ in case [[ f : φ ]] = [[g : ψ]]. We call an interface f : φ tight for ΣP if it is minimal wrt
and f : φ =
, i.e., whenever g : ψ f : φ and ΣP |= g : ψ then f : φ ∼
= g : ψ. A tight interface provides exact
information about ΣP in both the functional and the resource dimensions within the expressiveness of
our typing language. Typically, however, we are given some schedule ΣP together with a fixed type φ
and ask for a minimal bound f such that ΣP |= f : φ . If such a tight bound exists and is unique we call it
worst-case for φ .
We generalise equivalence to arbitrary types, taking φ ∼
= ψ to mean that for every f ∈ Bnd(φ ) there
is g ∈ Bnd(ψ) such that f : φ ∼
= g : ψ and vice versa, for each g ∈ Bnd(ψ) we can find f ∈ Bnd(φ )
with g : ψ ∼
= f : φ . The main purpose of the relations and ∼
= is to justify strengthening, weakening or
semantics-preserving, transformations to handle interfaces as tightly as sensible. They are the basis of
the interface algebra, some of whose laws will be studied next.
3
The Algebra of Scheduling Types
The set of scheduling bounds Bnd(φ ) captures the amount of resource information associated with a
type φ . In this respect the most simple class of types is that for which Bnd(φ ) is (order) isomorphic
to 1. Such types are called pure since they do not carry resource information and thus specify only
functional behaviour. It will be convenient to exploit the isomorphisms Bnd(ζ ) ∼
= 1 and identify all
bounds f ∈ Bnd(ζ ) of a pure type canonically with the unique 0 ∈ 1. Further, since it is unique, we
may as well drop the (non-informative) bound and simply write ζ instead of 0 : ζ . This means, e.g., that
ζ1 ∧ ζ2 , (0, 0) : ζ1 ∧ ζ2 and 0 : ζ1 ∧ ζ2 are all identified.
Second, with this simplification on pure types in place, we may mix bounds and types and apply
the type operators to full interfaces. Since f : φ specifies individual activations it formally behaves like
an atomic statement. Hence, it is possible to use interfaces f : φ themselves as generalised “control
variables” in types such as ( f : φ ) ∧ ψ or ◦( f : φ ). We simply define
Bnd( f : φ ) =d f 1
σ |= 0 : ( f : φ ) iff σ |= f : φ
which turns an interface f : φ into a pure type. Then, e.g., [[ f : φ ∧ g : ψ]] = [[(0, 0) : ( f : φ ∧ g : ψ)]] =
[[0 : ( f : φ )]] ∩ [[0 : (g : ψ)]] = [[ f : φ ]] ∩ [[g : ψ]].
Michael Mendler
33
A few basic facts about the interface algebra arising from Def. 2.2 are readily derived. Not really
surprisingly, true and false are complements, ¬true ∼
= false, ¬false ∼
= true as well as neutral false ⊗ φ ∼
=
∼
∼
∼
∼
∼
∼
false ⊕ φ = true ∧ φ = φ and dominant elements false ∧ φ = false, true ⊕ φ = true ∨ φ = true ⊗ φ = true.
Shifting a type by −∞ and +∞ produces the strongest and weakest statements false and true, respectively:
Proposition 3.1 For arbitrary types φ , −∞ : ◦φ ∼
= false and +∞ : ◦φ ∼
= true.
All operators ∨, ∧, ⊕ and ⊗ are commutative. The pairs ∨ ↔ ∧ and ⊕ ↔ ∧ fully distribute over
each other, while ⊗ distributes over both ⊕ and ∨, but not the other way round. Between ⊗ and ∧ no
distribution is possible, in general. One can show that the fragment ∨, ∧, false, ¬, ⊃ satisfies the laws of
Heyting algebras seen in Prop. 3.2.
Proposition 3.2 For arbitrary types φ1 , φ2 , ψ:
ψ ⊃ψ ∼
= true
(φ1 ∧ φ2 ) ⊃ ψ ∼
= φ1 ⊃ (φ2 ⊃ ψ)
(φ1 ∨ φ2 ) ⊃ ψ ∼
= (φ1 ⊃ ψ) ∧ (φ2 ⊃ ψ)
false ⊃ ψ ∼
= true
∼
ψ ⊃ false = ¬ψ
φ1 ⊃ (φ2 ⊃ φ1 ) ∼
= true
(φ1 ⊃ φ2 ) ∧ φ1 ∼
= φ1 ∧ φ2
ψ ⊃ (φ1 ∧ φ2 ) ∼
= (ψ ⊃ φ1 ) ∧ (ψ ⊃ φ2 )
∼
ψ ⊃ true = true
true ⊃ ψ ∼
= ψ.
It is worthwhile to observe that the classical principles of the Excluded Middle A ⊕ ¬A and A ∨ ¬A
are both different and not universally valid in WCRT algebra. The latter says A is static, i.e., A is present
in all activations or absent in all activations, the former that signal A is stable, i.e., in each activation
individually, A is either present from the start or never becomes active. Clearly, not every signal is
static or stable. The absence of the axioms A ⊕ ¬A, A ∨ ¬A, which arises naturally from the activation
semantics, is a definitive characteristics of intuitionistic logic or Heyting algebra. This feature is crucial
to handle the semantics of synchronous languages in a compositional and fully abstract way [20].
Boolean Types. An important sub–class of pure types are negated types ¬φ . They express universal
statements about each singleton event of each activation sequence in a schedule. For instance, Σ |=
¬(A ⊗ B) says that no event σ (i) ⊆ V (0 ≤ i < |σ |) in any σ ∈ Σ contains A or B. Similarly, ¬(A ⊃ B)
states that A is present and B is absent in every event of every activation sequence, which is the same as
¬¬(A ∧ ¬B). Negated types are expressively equivalent to, and can be transformed into, Boolean types
obtained from the following grammar, where φ is an arbitrary type:
β
::= true | false | A | ¬β | β ∧ β | β ⊗ β | φ ⊃ β .
Proposition 3.3 The Boolean types form a Boolean algebra with ¬, ∧, ⊗ as classical complement,
conjunction and disjunction, respectively. Moreover, Σ |= β iff for every σ ∈ Σ and i ∈ |σ | the event
σ (i) ⊆ V satisfies β as a classical Boolean formula in control variables V.
A consequence of Prop. 3.3 is that the interface algebra contains ordinary classical Boolean algebra as
the fragment of Boolean types. In particular, for Boolean types the Double Negation principle ¬¬β ∼
=β
and Excluded Middle ¬β ⊗ β ∼
= true hold as well as the De-Morgan Laws ¬(β1 ∧ β2 ) ∼
= ¬β1 ⊗ ¬β2 and
¬(β1 ⊗ β2 ) ∼
= ¬β1 ∧ ¬β2 . Boolean types, like all types satisfying ¬¬φ ∼
= φ or ¬φ ⊗ φ ∼
= true, behave
exactly like expressions of Boolean algebra, encapsulating a Boolean condition to be satisfied by each
event in a sequence.
34
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
Pure Types. The sum operator ⊕ takes us outside the sub-language of Boolean types. The reason is
that the truth of ⊕, e.g., in stability A ⊕ ¬A, depends on the global behaviour of an activation and cannot
be reduced to a single Boolean condition. This is highlighted by the difference between σ |= A ⊕ B
which is the condition ∀i ∈ |σ |, A ∈ σ (i) or ∀i ∈ |σ |, B ∈ σ (i) and σ |= A ⊗ B which says ∀i ∈ |σ |, A ∈
σ (i) or B ∈ σ (i). The larger class of pure types, which includes ⊕, give us the possibility to express
“Boolean” conditions across activations, as opposed to Boolean types which act within activations. The
pure types, denoted by meta-variable ζ , are characterised syntactically as follows:
ζ
::= β | ζ ∧ ζ | ζ ⊕ ζ | ζ ⊗ ζ | φ ⊃ ζ ,
where β is Boolean and φ is an arbitrary type. Notice that not only every Boolean type, but also every
negation ¬φ = φ ⊃ false, is pure according to this syntactic criterion.
L
Proposition 3.4 Every pure type ζ has a representation ζ ∼
= i βi over Boolean types βi .
Elementary Types. Pure types have the special property that schedules Σ are bounded for them iff each
individual activation σ ∈ Σ is bounded, i.e., they express properties of individual activations. Formally,
if Σ1 |= ζ and Σ2 |= ζ then Σ1 ∪ Σ2 |= ζ . Disjunctions ζ1 ∨ ζ2 and resource types ◦ζ , in contrast, do
not share this locality property: Although each activation σ may satisfy ζ1 or ζ2 , the schedule Σ as
a whole need not be resource-bounded for ζ1 ∨ ζ2 as this would mean all activations satisfy ζ1 or all
satisfy ζ2 . Similarly, each individual activation σ ∈ Σ may validate ζ with some resource bound, without
necessarily there being a single common bound for all activations in Σ.
A useful class of types containing ∨ and ◦ are those for which Bnd(φ ) is canonically order-isomorn for some n ≥ 0. These scheduling types φ with
phic to a Cartesian product of numbers, i.e., to N∞
Bnd(φ ) ∼
= Nn∞ are called elementary. They are generated by the grammar
θ
::= ζ | θ ∧ θ | θ ⊕ θ | θ ⊗ θ | ◦ζ | ψ ⊃ θ ,
where ζ is pure and ψ is ◦-free. Elementary scheduling types are of special interest since their elements
are first-order objects, i.e., vectors and matrices of natural numbers.
Elementary interfaces specify the resource consumption of logical controls. For instance, σ |= (d, 0) :
◦ζ , given ζ = ⊕i βi (see Prop. 3.4), says that σ enters and remains inside a region of events described
by one of the Boolean conditions βi and consumes at most d resource units to do that. The special case
σ |= d : ◦false says that σ consumes no more than d units during any instant. Similarly, σ |= ζ ⊃ (d, 0) :
◦ξ with ζ = ⊕i βi and ξ = ⊕ j γ j says that every sub-activation σ 0 ⊆ σ that runs fully inside one of the
regions βi must reach one of the regions γ j with resources bounded by d. Then, σ |= ζ ⊃ (d, 0) : ◦false
means that σ consumes no more than d units while staying in any of the regions βi .
To compactify the notation we will write tuples (d1 , d2 ) for the bounds ((d1 , 0), (d2 , 0)) ∈ (N∞ × 1) ×
(N∞ × 1) ∼
= N∞ × N∞ of types such as ◦ζ1 ⊕ ◦ζ2 , ◦ζ1 ∧ ◦ζ2 , ◦ζ1 ⊗ ◦ζ2 . We apply this simplification
also to bounds f ∈ 1 → N∞ × 1 ∼
= N∞ for types such as ζ1 ⊃ ◦ζ2 : We write [d] : ζ1 ⊃ ◦ζ2 , treating
the bracketed value [d] like a function λ x. (d, 0). In fact, [d] : ζ1 ⊃ ◦ζ2 is the special case of a 1 × 1
matrix. We will systematically write column vectors [d1 ; d2 ] instead of λ x.((d1 , 0), (d2 , 0)) for the bounds
of types such as ζ ⊃ ◦ζ1 ⊕ ◦ζ2 , ζ ⊃ ◦ζ1 ∧ ◦ζ2 or ζ ⊃ ◦ζ1 ⊗ ◦ζ2 , and row-vectors [d1 , d2 ] in place of
λ x. case x of [(0, 0) → (d1 , 0), (1, 0) → (d2 , 0)] for types ζ1 ∨ ζ2 ⊃ ◦ζ . Our linearised matrix notation uses
semicolon for row-wise and ordinary colon for columns-wise composition of sub-matrices. Specifically,
[d11 ; d21 , d12 ; d22 ] and [d11 , d12 ; d21 , d22 ] denote the same 2 × 2 matrix.
Michael Mendler
35
In the following Secs. 4 and 5 we are going illustrate different sub-algebras of specialised elementary
types to manipulate combined functional and quantitative information and to facilitate interface abstractions. These generalise the algebra of dioids [4, 17] to full max-min-plus, obtaining an equally tight as
uniform combination of scheduling algebra and logical reasoning.
4
Examples I: Network Flow, Shortest Path, Task Scheduling
The logical operations on types control the arithmetical operations on resource bounds. The next two
Props. 4.1 and 4.2 sum up some important basic facts.
Proposition 4.1 The arithmetic operations min, max and + compute worst-case bounds such that
[d1 ] : ζ1 ⊃ ◦ζ2 ∧ [d2 ] : ζ2 ⊃ ◦ζ3 [d1 + d2 ] : ζ1 ⊃ ◦ζ3
(1)
[d1 ] : ζ ⊃ ◦ζ1 ∧ [d2 ] : ζ ⊃ ◦ζ2 [min(d1 , d2 )] : ζ ⊃ ◦(ζ1 ⊕ ζ2 )
(3)
[d1 ] : ζ1 ⊃ ◦ζ ∧ [d2 ] : ζ2 ⊃ ◦ζ
(5)
[d1 ] : ζ ⊃ ◦ζ1 ∧ [d2 ] : ζ ⊃ ◦ζ2 [max(d1 , d2 )] : ζ ⊃ ◦(ζ1 ∧ ζ2 )
(2)
[d1 ] : ζ1 ⊃ ◦ζ ∧ [d2 ] : ζ2 ⊃ ◦ζ
(4)
[max(d1 , d2 )] : (ζ1 ⊕ ζ2 ) ⊃ ◦ζ
[min(d1 , d2 )] : (ζ1 ∧ ζ2 ) ⊃ ◦ζ .
The law (1) expresses a sequential composition of an offset by d1 from control point ζ1 to ζ2 with
a further shift of d2 from ζ2 to ζ3 . The best guarantee we can give for the cost between ζ1 and ζ3 is
the addition d1 + d2 . The bounds [d1 ] and [d2 ] act like typed functions with [d1 + d2 ] being function
composition, [d2 ] · [d1 ] = [d1 + d2 ]. This is nothing but the multiplication of 1 × 1 matrices in max-plus or
min-plus algebra. The law (2) is conjunctive forking: If it takes at most d1 units from ζ to some control
point ζ1 and at most d2 to ζ2 , then we know that within max(d1 , d2 ) we have activated both together,
ζ1 ∧ ζ2 . A special case of this occurs when ζ ∼
= true, i.e., d1 : ◦ζ1 ∧ d2 : ◦ζ2 ∼
= max(d1 , d2 ) : ◦(ζ1 ∧ ζ2 ).
Now suppose conjunction is replaced by sum ζ1 ⊕ ζ2 , i.e., we are only interested in activating one of ζ1
or ζ2 , but do not care which. The worst-case bound for this disjunctive forking is the minimum, as seen
in (3). Again, there is the special case d1 : ◦ζ1 ∧ d2 : ◦ζ2 ∼
= min(d1 , d2 ) : ◦(ζ1 ⊕ ζ2 ). Dually, disjunctive
joins (4) are governed by the maximum: Suppose that starting in ζ1 activates ζ with at most d1 cost and
starting in ζ2 takes at most d2 resource units. Then, if we only know the activation starts from ζ1 or ζ2
but not which, we can obtain ζ if we are prepared to expend the maximum of both costs. If, however, we
assume the schedule activates both ζ1 and ζ2 , which amounts to conjunctive join, then the destination ζ
is obtained with the minimum of both shifts, see (5).
Proposition 4.2 Let ζ1 , ζ2 be pure types which are persistent in the sense that whenever σ (k) |= ζi for
0 ≤ k < |σ |, then σ [k, :] |= ζi , too. Then,
d1 : ◦ζ1 ⊗ d2 : ◦ζ2 d1 + d2 : ◦(ζ1 ⊕ ζ2 )
(d1 : ◦ζ1 ∧ (ζ1 ⊃ ζ2 )) ⊗ (d2 : ◦ζ2 ∧ (ζ2 ⊃ ζ1 )) d1 + d2 : ◦(ζ1 ∧ ζ2 ).
(6)
(7)
Consider (6) of Prop. 4.2. Suppose a schedule σ splits into two (sub-)threads σ = σ1 ∪ σ2 each
switching control ζ1 and ζ2 consuming at most d1 and d2 units, respectively. Since they can be arbitrarily
interleaved and we do not know which one completes first, all we can claim is σ (k) |= ζi for some
k ≤ d1 + d2 and i = 1, 2. By persistence, this suffices to maintain ζi from level k onwards, so that
σ |= d1 + d2 : ◦(ζ1 ⊕ ζ2 ). Without imposing further assumptions, a sub-thread may be allocated an
unknown number of resource units, thereby stalling the progress of the other, unboundedly. The situation
36
Michael
Mendler
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
9
changes, however,
however, if
if the
the ζζii are
are synchronisation
synchronisation points
points where
where the
the threads
threads must
must give
give up
up control
control unless
unless the
the
changes,
other
thread
has
passed
its
own
synchronisation
point
ζ
(i
=
6
j),
too.
This
is
the
content
of
(7)
and
other thread has passed its own synchronisation point ζ jj (i 6= j), too. This is the content of (7) and
specified formally
formally by
by the
the additional
additional constraints
constraints ζζii ⊃
⊃ ζζ jj..
specified
Prop.
4.1
and
4.2
highlight
how
the
arithmetic
of min-max-plus
min-max-plus algebra
algebra are
are guided
guided by
by the
the logical
logical
Prop. 4.1 and 4.2 highlight how the arithmetic of
semantics of
of interface
interface types.
types. From
From this
this vantage
vantage point,
point, resource
resource analysis
analysis is
is nothing
nothing but
but aa semanticssemanticssemantics
consistent
manipulation
of
a
collection
of
numbers:
Whether
[d
]
:
φ
,
[d
]
:
φ
are
to
be
added,
maximised
1
1
2
2
consistent manipulation of a collection of numbers: Whether [d1 ] : φ1 , [d2 ] : φ2 are to be added, maximised
or minimised
minimised depends
depends on
on their
their types
types φφ11 and
and φφ22.. In
In particular,
particular, keeping
keeping track
track of
of the
the types
types will
will make
make the
the
or
difference between
between aa max-of-sums
max-of-sums (sum-of-mins)
(sum-of-mins) as
as opposed
opposed to
to aa sum-of-maxes
sum-of-maxes (min-of-sums).
(min-of-sums).
difference
4.1 Network
Network Flow
Flow
4.1
Consider the
the dependency
dependency graph
graph in
in Fig.
Fig. 11 with
with conconConsider
trol
nodes
V
=
{A,
B,C,
D,
E,
F}
and
dependency
2
trol nodes V = {A, B,C, D, E, F} and dependency
E
B
edges
labelled
by
positive
integers.
Let
us
asedges labelled by positive integers. Let us as5
1
5
sume the
the graph
graph models
models aa communication
communication network
network
sume
2
D
in which
which control
control nodes
nodes represent
represent packet
packet routers
routers
A
in
4
4
and edges
edges are
are directed
directed point-to-point
point-to-point connections
connections
and
3
F
8
of limited
limited bandwidth.
bandwidth. For
For instance,
instance, the
the router
router at
at
of
C
node D
D receives
receives packets
packets from
from routers
routers B
B and
and C
C
node
through
channels
of
bandwidth
1
and
4,
respecFigure
through channels of bandwidth 1 and 4, respecFigure 1:
1: Scheduling
Scheduling Dependency
Dependency Graph
Graph N
N
tively. It
It forwards
forwards the
the incoming
incoming traffic
traffic to
to routers
routers
tively.
E or
or F
F of
of bandwidth
bandwidth 55 and
and 4,
4, respectively.
respectively. The
The bandwidth
bandwidth measures
measures the
the maximal
maximal amount
amount of
of information
information
E
that
can
travel
across
the
channel
per
synchronisation
instant.
The
analysis
of
the
maximum
throughput
that can travel across the channel per synchronisation instant. The analysis of the maximum throughput
is aa synchronous
synchronous scheduling
scheduling problem
problem which
which can
can be
be modelled
modelled using
using interface
interface types.
types.
is
We
associate
with
the
network
N
a
scheduling
type
φ
,
such
that
the
amount
of packets
packets that
that can
can
We associate with the network N a scheduling type φNN, such that the amount of
be
pushed
into
a
node
X
is
given
by
the
minimal
d
such
that
φ
X
⊃
d
:
◦false,
i.e.,
the
maximal
be pushed into a node X is given by the minimal d such that φNN X ⊃ d : ◦false, i.e., the maximal
number of
of scheduling
scheduling cycles
cycles that
that node
node X
X may
may be
be kept
kept alive
alive within
within any
any activation
activation specified
specified by
by φφNN .. The
The
number
idea
is
that
if
σ
∈
[[φ
]]
is
a
valid
activation
of
N
then
each
cycle
i
∈
|σ
|
such
that
X
∈
σ
(i)
represents
idea is that if σ ∈ [[φNN ]] is a valid activation of N then each cycle i ∈ |σ | such that X ∈ σ (i) represents
packet unit
unit ii sent
sent through
through X
X.. The
The event
event σ
σ (i)
(i) ⊆
⊆V
V encodes
encodes the
the packet’s
packet’s path,
path, i.e.,
i.e., the
the set
set of
of all
all routers
routers
aa packet
that
payload
unit
i
is
passing
on
its
journey
through
the
network.
The
statement
σ
|=
X
⊃
d
:
◦false
then
that payload unit i is passing on its journey through the network. The statement σ |= X ⊃ d : ◦false then
says
that
whenever
X
becomes
alive
in
activation
σ
it
handles
no
more
d
packets.
This
number
may
vary
says that whenever X becomes alive in activation σ it handles no more d packets. This number may vary
between activations.
activations. The
The minimal
minimal d,
d, bounding
bounding all
all activations
activations in
in this
this way,
way, is
is the
the maximal
maximal throughput
throughput
between
at
X
permitted
by
specification
φ
.
Observe
that
both
capacity
values
0
and
−∞
are
equivalent,
at X permitted by specification φNN . Observe that both capacity values 0 and −∞ are equivalent, 00 ::
∼
∼
◦false ∼
−∞ :: ◦false
◦false ∼
false. In
In fact,
fact, the
the type
type X
X⊃
⊃ 00 :: ◦false
◦false paraphrased
paraphrased “X
“X forwards
forwards 00 packets”
packets” and
and
= −∞
= false.
◦false
=
=
X
⊃
−∞
:
◦false
saying
“X
does
not
forward
any
packets”,
are
the
same
statements
and
equivalent
to
¬X.
X ⊃ −∞ : ◦false saying “X does not forward any packets”, are the same statements and equivalent to ¬X .
Now consider
consider node
node D
D again.
again. Within
Within the
the synchronous
synchronous measurement
measurement instant,
instant, all
all packets
packets arriving
arriving at
at D
D
Now
must be
be scheduled
scheduled to
to leave
leave through
through channels
channels D
D→
→E
E or
or D
D→
→ F.
F. Consider
Consider an
an activation
activation σ
σ |=
|= D,
D, i.e.,
i.e., all
all
must
ii ∈
∈ ||σ
|
are
packets
dispatched
through
D.
Some
of
these
will
go
to
E,
others
to
F
and
all
go
to
one
of
σ | are packets dispatched through D. Some of these will go to E, others to F and all go to one of
the two.
two. Hence
Hence there
there are
are sub-activations
sub-activations σ
σ=
=σ
σ11 ∪
∪σ
σ22 such
such that
that σ
σ11 |=
|= E
E and
and σ
σ22 |=
|= F.
F. Also,
Also, because
because of
of
the
the
channel
limitations,
there
can
be
at
most
5
packet
units
of
the
former
and
4
of
the
latter
type.
Thus,
the channel limitations, there can be at most 5 packet units of the former and 4 of the latter type. Thus,
σ11 |=
|= E
E∧
∧ 55 :: ◦false
◦false and
and σ
σ22 |=
|= F
F∧
∧ 44 :: ◦false.
◦false. All
All in
in all,
all, we
we have
have found
found the
the type
type specifying
specifying D
D and
and its
its
σ
connections in
in N
N to
to be
be D
D⊃
⊃ (E
(E ∧
∧ 55 :: ◦false)
◦false) ⊗
⊗ (F
(F ∧
∧ 44 :: ◦false).
◦false).
connections
The
tensor
⊗
is
used
to
model
the
output
branching
at aa node.
node. Observe
Observe that
that if
if we
we increase
increase one
one of
of
The tensor ⊗ is used to model the output branching at
the channel
channel capacities
capacities to
to +∞,
+∞, say
say the
the one
one giving
giving access
access to
to E,
E, we
we get
get D
D⊃
⊃ (E
(E ∧
∧ +∞
+∞ :: ◦false)
◦false) ⊗
⊗ (F
(F ∧
∧ 44 ::
the
∼
∼
∼
◦false)
D
⊃
E
⊗
(F
∧
4
:
◦false)
because
E
∧
+∞
:
◦false
E
∧
true
E.
This
means
the
channel
∼
∼
∼
=
=
=
◦false) = D ⊃ E ⊗ (F ∧ 4 : ◦false) because E ∧ +∞ : ◦false = E ∧ true = E. This means the channel
D→
→E
E does
does not
not impose
impose any
any further
further constraints
constraints on
on the
the throughput
throughput besides
besides what
what E
E prescribes.
prescribes. If
If we
we
D
Michael Mendler
37
decrease the capacity to 0, the type reduces to D ⊃ (E ∧ 0 : ◦false) ⊗ (F ∧ 4 : ◦false) ∼
= D ⊃ F ∧ 4 : ◦false
since E ∧ 0 : ◦false ∼
= E ∧ false ∼
= false and false ⊗ φ ∼
= φ . Hence, a capacity of 0 behaves as if the
channel was cut off completely. Consequently, the degenerated case of a node X without any exits would
be specified by X ⊃ false or ¬X. If we conjoin the types for all nodes of N as seen in Fig. 1, we get
φN =d f
true ⊃ (A ∧ +∞ : ◦false)
∧ A ⊃ ((B ∧ 5 : ◦false) ⊗ (C ∧ 3 : ◦false))
(8)
(9)
∧ B ⊃ ((E ∧ 2 : ◦false) ⊗ (D ∧ 1 : ◦false))
(10)
∧ D ⊃ ((E ∧ 5 : ◦false) ⊗ (F ∧ 4 : ◦false))
(12)
∧ F ⊃ (true ∧ +∞ : ◦false).
(14)
∧C ⊃ ((D ∧ 4 : ◦false) ⊗ (F ∧ 8 : ◦false))
∧ E ⊃ (F ∧ 2 : ◦false)
(11)
(13)
Type (8) designates A as the source node of the network. It formalises a source channel of infinite
capacity permitting the global environment, represented by the logical control true, to push as many
packets as possible into A. Analogously, destination node F (14) returns packets back to the external
environment. Again, this sink channel has infinite capacity, since all packets arriving at F will delivered.
The throughput dN of N is the smallest d such that φN d : ◦false. To get the “exact” or “optimal”
bound we must explore the network in breadth and depth. The analysis strategy involves non-linear
global optimisation such as the Ford-Fulkerson or Goldberg’s Preflow-Push algorithms. This is not the
place to review these algorithm. We shall merely indicate how their logical content can be coded in type
theory. Consider that each of the network implications (8)–(14) of the form X ⊃ ⊗Y (Y ∧ dY : ◦false) can
be used as an equation X ∼
= X ∧ ⊗Y (Y ∧ dY : ◦false) for transformations by substitution. For example,
proceeding forwards from the source A, breadth-first, we can derive
true ∼
=A
∼
= A ∧ ((B ∧ 5 : ◦false) ⊗ (C ∧ 3 : ◦false))
∼
= A ∧ ((B ∧ ((E ∧ 2 : ◦false) ⊗ (D ∧ 1 : ◦false)) ∧ 5 : ◦false)
⊗ (C ∧ ((D ∧ 4 : ◦false) ⊗ (F ∧ 8 : ◦false)) ∧ 3 : ◦false))
∼
= ((A ∧ B ∧ E ∧ 2 : ◦false)
⊗ (A ∧ B ∧ D ∧ 1 : ◦false))
⊗ (((A ∧C ∧ D ∧ 3 : ◦false)
⊗ (A ∧C ∧ F ∧ 3 : ◦false)) ∧ 3 : ◦false),
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
using the special ∧/⊗ distribution X ∧ (φ1 ⊗ φ2 ) ∼
= (X ∧ φ1 ) ⊗ (X ∧ φ2 ) for atoms X ∈ V, and the derivable
laws ((φ1 ∧ d1 : ◦false) ⊗ (φ2 ∧ d2 : ◦false)) ∧ e : ◦false ∼
= (φ1 ∧ d1 : ◦false) ⊗ (φ2 ∧ d2 : ◦false) for e ≥ d1 +
d2 and ((φ1 ∧ d1 : ◦false) ⊗ (φ2 ∧ d2 : ◦false)) ∧ e : ◦false ∼
= (φ1 ∧ e : ◦false) ⊗ (φ2 ∧ e : ◦false) ∧ e : ◦false
for e ≤ min(d1 , d2 ).
The type (15)–(18) describes the resource usage of packets entering the network up to a depth of 3
nodes, classifying them into 4 separate flows: The packets from (15) pass through A → B → E and can
occupy at most 2 bandwidth units, those from (16) follow the path A → B → D and have a volume of at
most 1 unit. Furthermore, the packets (17) travelling along A → C → D or (18) on path A → C → F each
have at most volume 3, as specified by A ∧C ∧ D ∧ 3 : ◦false and A ∧C ∧ F ∧ 3 : ◦false. Moreover, their
sum must not exceed the limit 3 either, as enforced by the extra outer conjunct 3 : ◦false. The maximal
38
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
flow through the network can be obtained by applying the (in-)equations (15)–(18) in this fashion until
saturation is achieved, when all logical controls may be dropped, turning equation ∼
= into inequation :
true ∼
= A ∼
= ···
∼
= ((A ∧ B ∧ E ∧ F ∧ 2 : ◦false)
⊗ (A ∧ B ∧ D ∧ F ∧ 1 : ◦false))
⊗ (((((A ∧C ∧ D ∧ F ∧ 3 : ◦false)
⊗ (A ∧C ∧ D ∧ E ∧ F ∧ 2 : ◦false)) ∧ 3 : ◦false)
⊗ (A ∧C ∧ F ∧ 3 : ◦false)) ∧ 3 : ◦false)
(2 : ◦false ⊗ 1 : ◦false)
⊗ ((((3 : ◦false ⊗ 2 : ◦false) ∧ 3 : ◦false) ⊗ 3 : ◦false) ∧ 3 : ◦false) ∼
= 6 : ◦false,
using the laws d : ◦false ∧ e : ◦false ∼
= min(d, e) : ◦false and d : ◦false ⊗ e : ◦false ∼
= d + e : ◦false, derived
from (3) and (6), respectively.
This saturation process is a fixed-point construction which may be implemented using a standard
“max-flow” algorithm. Specifically, the graph algorithms of Ford-Fulkerson or Goldberg are efficient
decision procedures for deciding the algebra induced by the fragment of types appearing in (8)–(18).
This sub-algebra of “logical numbers” provides a purely algebraic interpretation for these standard algorithms. It should be clear that the graph-theoretic information is coded in the syntactic structure of the
types. However, in contrast to plain graphs, types are equipped with behavioural meaning in the form of
scheduling sequences. They generate a plus-min algebra of scheduling sequences which is not a linear
algebra, as it does not satisfy distribution. Specifically, e : ◦false ∧ (d1 : ◦false ⊗ d2 : ◦false) ∼
= min(e, d1 +
d2 ) : ◦false min(e, d1 ) + min(e, d2 ) : ◦false ∼
= (e : ◦false ∧ d1 : ◦false) ⊗ (e : ◦false ∧ d2 : ◦false). This
approximation offset, of course, is why max-flow problems are not linear matrix problems but require
global search and relaxation methods.
4.2
Shortest Path
A different interpretation of the scheduling graph Fig. 1 reads the edge labels as distances and asks for
the length of the shortest path through the network. This leads to an “inverted” network algebra: The
sequential composition of edges is addition and the branching of edges at a node is associated with the
minimum operation, whereas in the network flow situation of Sec. 4.1, sequential composition corresponds to minimum and branching is addition. Not surprisingly, the shortest path interpretation invokes
a different fragment of the type theory. Again, each node is a control variable V = {A, B,C, D, E, F}.
An activation σ models a journey through the network activating control nodes as it passes them. If σ
activates X at time i, then X ∈ σ (i), and if it traverses an edge X → Y with distance label d, then for
some 0 ≤ k ≤ d, Y ∈ σ (i + k). Hence σ satisfies the type X ⊃ d : ◦Y . If there are several outgoing edges
X → Y1 and X → Y2 and σ reaches X, then, because we are interested in the shortest path, we permit σ
to explore both branches “in parallel”. Hence, σ fulfils both implications X ⊃ d1 : ◦Y1 and X ⊃ d2 : ◦Y2 .
Following this idea, the network N as given in Fig. 1 comes out as the type specification
φN =d f A ⊃ 5 : ◦B ∧ A ⊃ 3 : ◦C ∧ B ⊃ 1 : ◦D ∧ B ⊃ 2 : ◦E
∧ C ⊃ 4 : ◦D ∧ C ⊃ 8 : ◦F ∧ D ⊃ 5 : ◦E ∧ D ⊃ 4 : ◦F ∧ E ⊃ 2 : ◦F.
(19)
The length of the shortest path between X and Y is the minimal d such that φN X ⊃ d : ◦Y . By (1),
sequentially connecting edges X ⊃ d1 : ◦Y and Y ⊃ d2 : ◦Z yields X ⊃ d1 + d2 : ◦Z, and a choice of two
Michael Mendler
39
paths X ⊃ d1 : ◦Z and X ⊃ d2 : ◦Z between the same start and end node, by (3) implies X ⊃ min(d1 , d2 ) :
◦Z as desired. Now the values of 0 and −∞ have different meaning: X ⊃ 0 : ◦Y is equivalent to X ⊃ Y
modelling an edge without cost. In contrast, X ⊃ −∞ : ◦Y is semantically the same as X ⊃ false which
says that no activation reaches control node X. A distance +∞ expresses absence of a connection since
X ⊃ +∞ : ◦Y ∼
= X ⊃ true ∼
= true which does not give any information about how to reach Y from X.
It is well-known how to compute shortest paths by linear programming. This exploits the distribution
law min(e + d1 , e + d2 ) = e + min(d1 , d2 ), which permits us to organise the scheduling bounds in the
network theory (19) in form of matrices and to manipulate them using typed matrix multiplications. For
instance, we can combine the two outgoing edges of A into a single type
(A ⊃ 5 : ◦B) ∧ (A ⊃ 3 : ◦C) ∼
= A ⊃ (5, 3) : ◦B ∧ ◦C ∼
= [5; 3] : A ⊃ ◦B ∧ ◦C,
(20)
where [5; 3] abbreviates the function λ x. ((5, 0), (3, 0)) interpreted as a column vector of numbers. Dually,
the two incoming edges into node D can be combined into a single type
(B ⊃ 1 : ◦D) ∧ (C ⊃ 4 : ◦D) ∼
= [1, 4] : B ∨C ⊃ ◦D,
(21)
where [1, 4] is the function λ x. case x of [0 → (1, 0), 1 → (4, 0)] thought of as a row vector. The type
algebra, essentially (1) and (3), proves that the conjunction of both (20) and (21) implies the matrix
multiplication
([5; 3] : A ⊃ ◦B ∧ ◦C) ∧ ([1, 4] : B ∨C ⊃ ◦D) min(5 + 1, 3 + 4) : A ⊃ ◦D = [1, 4] · [5; 3] : A ⊃ ◦D
in min-plus algebra. More generally, for every sub-network with source nodes X1 , X2 , . . . , Xm and sink
n
nodes Y1 ,Y2 , . . . ,Yn we have an elementary type D : ∨m
i=1 Xi ⊃ ∧ j=1 ◦Y j describing the shortest path ben
tween any source to any target, in which the scheduling bound D ∈ Bnd((∨m
i=1 Xi ) ⊃ ⊗ j=1 ◦Y j ) behaves
like a n × m matrix in min-plus algebra. For instance, take the decomposition of N into the edge sets
N1 =d f {A → B, A → C}, N2 =d f {B → E, B → D,C → D,C → F} and N3 =d f {D → E, D → F, E → F}:
D(N1 ) = [5; 3] : A ⊃ (◦B ∧ ◦C)
D(N2 ) = [1; 2; +∞, 4; +∞; 8] : (B ∨C) ⊃ (◦D ∧ ◦E ∧ ◦F)
D(N3 ) = [4, 2, 0] : (D ∨ E ∨ F) ⊃ ◦F.
The shortest path from A to F is then obtained by multiplying these matrices
[4, 2, 0] · [1; 2; +∞, 4; +∞; 8] · [5; 3] = [4, 2, 0] · [6; 7; 11] = 9 : A ⊃ ◦F
in min-plus-algebra. The type-theoretic approach facilitates a compositional on-the-fly construction of
the shortest path matrix. The pure algebraic technique would combine all the information in a global
6 × 6 network matrix N : (∨X∈V X) ⊃ (∧X∈V ◦X) where (N)XY = d < +∞ if there exists an edge X ⊃ d : Y
in φN . Then, the shortest path matrix is N ∗ = Id ∧ N ∧ N 2 ∧ · · · , where Id is the identity matrix with 0s in
the diagonal and +∞ everywhere else and ∧ is the operation of forming element-wise minimum, lifting
the logical operation d1 : ◦X ∧ d2 : ◦X ∼
= min(d1 , d2 ) : ◦X to matrices. The entries in N ∗ are the shortest
distances between any two nodes in the network.
This way of solving shortest paths is well-known, of course. But now the behavioural typing permits
us safely to play over- and under-approximation games which are difficult to control in pure algebra
or graph theory without model-theoretic semantics. Just to give a simple example, suppose we wanted
to derive a lower bound on the shortest path. Such can be obtained by identifying some of the control
40
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
nodes, i.e., pretending we could jump between them on our path to reach the destination. For instance,
assuming C ≡ B, we find that φN ∧ C ≡ B A ⊃ 7 : ◦F is the shortest distance. Since the conjunction
φN ∧C ≡ B specifies a subset of activations, the shortest distance between A and F relative to φN ∧C ≡ B
is a lower bound on the shortest distance relative to φN . It may be more efficient to compute since the
network φN ∧C ≡ B only has 5 different nodes rather than 6 as with φN .
4.3
Task Scheduling
In yet another interpretation of network N the nodes are tasks and edges scheduling dependencies associated with upper bounds for task completion. Computing the worst-case completion time for the overall
schedule, sequential composition of edges corresponds to addition as in the shortest path scenario Sec. 4.2
but branching now involves maximum rather than the minimum. Again, this is induced by the logical
nature of the problem, the fact that the input join now is conjunctive rather than disjunctive as before. For
instance, task D in Fig. 1 cannot start before both tasks C and B have started with a set-up delay of 4 time
units from the start of C and 1 unit from B. Let us assume the task activation times are included in these
set-up delays. To model this type-theoretically we take the edges as the atomic control variables, i.e.,
V = {AC, AB,CD,CF, BD, BE, DE, DF, F}. Whenever XY ∈ σ (i), for i ∈ |σ |, this says that the edge XY
is ready, i.e., the source task X is completed and the start token has arrived at the corresponding control
input of target task Y . The node D establishes a logical-arithmetical relationship between its input edges
CD, BD and its output edges DF, DE, given by CD ∧ BD ⊃ (4 : ◦DF) ∧ (5 : ◦DE). Overall,
φN =d f (true ⊃ 3 : ◦AC ∧ 5 : ◦AB) ∧ (AC ⊃ 4 : ◦CD ∧ 8 : ◦CF)
∧ (AB ⊃ 1 : ◦BD ∧ 2 : ◦BE) ∧ ((CD ∧ BD) ⊃ 4 : ◦DF ∧ 5 : ◦DE)
∧ (DE ∧ BE ⊃ 2 : ◦EF) ∧ (CF ∧ DF ∧ EF ⊃ 0 : ◦F).
The critical path is the minimal d such that φN d : ◦F. It can be computed by linear programming
involving matrix multiplication in max-plus algebra using essentially the laws (1) and (2).
5
Examples II: Esterel-style Synchronous Multi-threading
Like task scheduling in Sec. 4.3, the timing analysis of Esterel programs [6, 22] involves max-plus
algebra, yet takes place in an entirely different fragment of the type theory. Instead of implications
ζ1 ∧ ζ2 ⊃ ◦ξ1 ∧ ◦ξ2 as in Sec. 4.3 we employ dependencies of the form ζ1 ∨ ζ2 ⊃ ◦ξ1 ⊕ ◦ξ2 , which
are handled by (1) and (4) rather than (1) and (2). In addition, we use the tensor ⊗ for capturing multithreaded parallelism. Here we provide some further theoretical background for the work reported in [22].
Esterel programs communicate via signals, which are either present or absent during one instant.
Signals are set present by the emit statement and tested with the present test. They are reset at the
start of each instant. Esterel statements can be either combined in sequence (;) or in parallel (||).
The loop statement simply restarts its body when it terminates. All Esterel statements are considered
instantaneous, except for the pause statement, which pauses for one instant, and derived statements like
halt (= loop pause end), which stops forever. Esterel supports multiple forms of preemption, e. g.,
via the abort statement, which simply terminates its body when some trigger signal is present. Abortion
can be either weak or strong. Weak abortion permits the activation of its body in the instant the trigger
signal becomes active, strong abortion does not. Both kinds of abortions can be either immediate or
delayed. The immediate version already senses for the trigger signal in the instant its body is entered,
while the delayed version ignores it during the first instant in which the abort body is started.
Michael Mendler
14
41
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
Consider the Esterel fragment in Figure 2b. It consists of two threads. The first thread G emits signals
Consider the Esterel fragment in Figure 2b. It consists of two threads. The first thread G emits signals
R, S, T depending on some input signal I. In any case, it emits signal U and terminates instantaneously.
R, S, T depending on some input signal I. In any case, it emits signal U and terminates instantaneously.
The thread H continuously emits signal R, until signal I occurs. Thereafter, it either halts, when E is
The thread H continuously emits signal R, until signal I occurs. Thereafter, it either halts, when E is
present, or emits S and terminates otherwise, after having executed the skip statement nothing.
present, or emits S and terminates otherwise, after having executed the skip statement nothing.
1
21
32
T0
43
54
v0 fork
G0
65
76
G
H
v1 present I
_
+
109
11
10
v8 wabort I
L5
12
11
13
12
L12
G1 v2 emit R
14
13
15
14
v9 pause
L6
15
L13
v3 present I
+
87
98
H0
H3 v10 emit R
v12 present E
v5 emit S
v4 goto
_
+
L14
v11 goto
L16
v13 halt
L9
H2
v14 emit S
L18
G2 v6 emit T
v15 nothing
L10
v7 emit U
L19
L11
v16 join
L20
(a) CKAG
(a) CKAG
R end present;
S;
emitpresent;
T end present;
R end
S; emit T end present;
end present;
end present;
(b) Esterel module T
(b) Esterel module T
H1 I
_
L7 G3
% module T
[ %
threadTG
%
module
[ present
% threadI Gthen emit
present I then
else emit
emit
U; I else emit
present
|| emit U;
|| % thread H
weak
abort
% thread
H
loopabort
weak
pause;emit R
loop
endpause;emit
loop
R
when
I;
end immediate
loop
present
E then halt
when immediate
I;
emit
S; nothing;
present
E then halt
] emit S; nothing;
]
L01:
L02:
L01:
L03:
L02:
L03:
L04:
L05:
L04:
L06:
L05:
L07:
L06:
L08:
L07:
L09:
L08:
L10:
L09:
L10:
L11:
L12:
L11:
L13:
L12:
L14:
L13:
L15:
L14:
L16:
L15:
L17:
L16:
L18:
L17:
L18:
L19:
L19:
T0: PAR 1,G0,1
T0: PAR
PAR 1,H0,2
1,G0,1
PARE
A1
PAR 1,H0,2
PARE A1
G0: PRESENT I,G1
R I,G1
G0: EMIT
PRESENT
G1: PRESENT
EMIT R I,G3
G2 I,G3
G1: GOTO
PRESENT
G3: EMIT
GOTOSG2
G3: EMIT
EMIT T
S
G2: EMIT
EMIT U
T
G2: EMIT U
H0: WABORT I,H1
H3:
H0: PAUSE
WABORT I,H1
H3: EMIT
PAUSER
GOTO
EMIT RH3
H1: PRESENT
GOTO H3 E,H2
H1: HALT
PRESENT E,H2
H2: EMIT
HALT S
H2: NOTHING
EMIT S
NOTHING
A1: JOIN
A1: JOIN
(c) KEP Assembler
(c) KEP Assembler
Figure 2: Esterel module T (b) with control-flow graph (a) and resulting KEP Assembler (c).
Figure 2: Esterel module T (b) with control-flow graph (a) and resulting KEP Assembler (c).
The concurrent KEP assembler graph [18] (CKAG, see Fig. 2a) captures the control flow, both
The concurrent
assembler
graph program.
[18] (CKAG,
see Fig.is 2a)
captures
the Esterel
controlprogram
flow, both
standard
control and KEP
abortions,
of an Esterel
The CKAG
derived
from the
by
standard
control
and
abortions,
of
an
Esterel
program.
The
CKAG
is
derived
from
the
Esterel
program
by
structural translation. For a given CKAG, the generation of assembly code for the Kiel Esterel Processor
structural
translation.
For
a
given
CKAG,
the
generation
of
assembly
code
for
the
Kiel
Esterel
Processor
(KEP) [18, 19], executing synchronous parallelism by multi-threading, is straight-forward (see Fig. 2c).
(KEP)
19],
executing
synchronous
parallelism
multi-threading,
is straight-forward
(see synchroFig. 2c).
Let[18,
S, L
and
M be disjoint
sets of
(input orby
output)
signals, control
flow labels and
Let S,
L and
M be disjoint
(inputmodule
or output)
signals,
synchronisation
states,
respectively.
Forsets
the of
Esterel
in Fig.
2 we control
have S flow
= {I,labels
E, R, S,and
T,U},
L=
nisation
states,
respectively.
For
the
Esterel
module
in
Fig.
2
we
have
S
=
{I,
E,
R,
S,
T,U
}, Lde=
{L0, . . . , L20, G0, . . . , G3, H0, . . . , H3}. As synchronisation states we use the names of the atomic
{L0, . . . , L20, G0, . . . , G3, H0, . . . , H3}. As synchronisation states we use the names of the atomic de-
42
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
lay nodes, i.e., the pause, halt and join nodes, M = {v9 , v13 , v16 }. These describe the different state
bits of the synchronous automaton coded by the program block T . To distinguish the cases of a thread
starting from or ending in a given state s ∈ M during an instant we use the modifiers out(s) and in(s).
The former expresses that the thread is leaving from s at the beginning of the instant and the latter that
it enters and terminates the instant in s. The set M+ =d f {out(s), in(s) | s ∈ M} collects these atomic
statements. The set of control variables, specifying the atomic control points of a program module, is
the union V = S ∪ L ∪ M+ . All the controls out(s) are stable, i.e., we may assume out(s) ⊕ ¬out(s). This
is not true for controls in(s) which are switched on dynamically as the schedule enters a delay node.
One possible activation of the Esterel module T in Fig. 2a would be as follows. Initially, control
variable T 0 is set, so σ (0) = {T 0}. Then the PAR and PARE instructions making up the fork node v0
are executed in line numbers L01, L02, L03 of Fig. 2c, each taking one instruction cycle (ic). The two
PAR instructions set up internal counters for thread control, which does not change the set of events
in the variables of Fig. 2a. Hence, σ (1) = σ (2) = {T 0}. After the PARE both control variable G0,
H0 become present bringing threads G and H to life. This means σ (3) = {T 0, G0, H0}. The next
instruction could be any of the two first instructions of G or H. As it happens, the KEP Assembler
Fig. 2c assigns higher priority to H so that our activation continues with wabort (node v8 ), i.e., σ (4) =
{T 0, G0, H0, L12}. This brings up the pause instruction v9 . Now, depending on whether signal I is
present or not the activation of pause either moves to v12 (weak immediate abort) or terminates. Let us
assume the latter, i.e., σ (5) = {T 0, G0, H0, L12, in(v9 )}, where thread H is finished up for the instant
and has entered a wait state in node v9 . The activation continues with the first instruction of G, the
present node v1 at label G0. Since I is assumed absent, its activation effects a jump to label G1, i.e.,
σ (6) = {T 0, G0, H0, L12, in(v9 ), G1}. Thereafter, we run sequentially through nodes v3 , v5 , v6 , v7 giving
σ (7) = σ (6) ∪ {G3}, σ (8) = σ (7) ∪ {L9} and σ (9) = σ (8) ∪ {L10}.
Executing the final emit instruction v7 hits the join at entry L11, so that σ (10) = {T 0, G0, H0,
L12, in(v9 ), G1, G3, L9, L10, L11}. Now both threads G and H are finished. While G is terminated and
hands over to the main thread T for good, H is still pausing in v9 . It takes one activation step of the
join node v16 to detect this and to terminate the synchronous instant of T with the final event σ (11) =
{T 0, G0, H0, L12, in(v9 ), G1, G3, L9, L10, L11, in(v16 )}. Overall, we get an activation of the outer-most
main thread of T , σ = σ (0), . . . , σ (11), starting from program label T 0 consisting of 12 ics in total. In the
next logical instant when T is resumed in v16 and v9 , with initial event σ (0) = {out(v9 ), out(v16 )}, and
thread H eventually comes out at control point L19 (if signal I is present and E absent), then executing
the join v16 will bring us to control point L20 and out of T instantaneously.
Activation sequences starting in control label T 0 and ending in L20 are called through paths, those
starting in T 0 and pausing in a synchronisation state in(s), s ∈ {v9 , v13 , v16 }, are sink paths; source paths
begin in a state out(s) and end in L20, while internal paths begin in a state and end in a state.
Esterel IO-Interface Types. Our normal form interfaces to describe Esterel-KEP modules are of the
W
Ln
form θ = φ ⊃ ψ, with input control φ = m
i=1 ζi and output control ψ =
k=1 ◦ξk where the ζi and ξk
are pure types. The former φ captures all the possible ways in which a program module (or any other
fragment) of type θ can be started within an instant and the latter ψ sums up the ways in which it can
be exited during the instant. Intuitively, Σ |= θ says that whenever the schedule Σ enters the fragment
through one of the input controls ζi then within some bounded number of ics it is guaranteed to exit
through one of the output controls ξk . The disjunction ∨ in the input control φ models the external
non-determinism resolved by the environment which determines how a program block is started. On the
output side ψ, the selection of which exit ξk is taken is expressed by ⊕ since it is an internal choice which
Michael Mendler
43
is dynamically resolved during each activation. Each delay operator ◦ stands for a possibly different delay
L
depending on which output ξk is taken. Contrast this with an output control such as ψ = ◦( nk=1 ξk )
which only specifies one bound for all exits ξk . An interface bound T ∈ Bnd(φ ⊃ ψ) can be understood
as a n × m shaped timing matrix relative to the Boolean controls ζi and ξk serving as “base” vectors.
The logical conjunction of these interfaces in a fixed set of such base controls corresponds to matrix
multiplications in max-plus algebra. Furthermore, using logical reasoning on base controls ζi , ξ j we can
massage the semantics of timing matrices very much like we do with base transformations in ordinary
linear algebra. Two important operations on IO-interfaces are matrix multiplication and the Kronecker
product which in our scheduling algebra are now strongly typed and thus receive semantic meaning in
logical spaces.
Transient and Sequential Submodules G and H. A full and exact WCRT specification encapsulating
the synchronous block G as a component would require mention of program labels G1, G3, G2 which are
accessible from outside for jump statements. Therefore, the interface type for single-threaded scheduling
of G would be [6, 4, 3, 1] : G0 ∨ G1 ∨ G3 ∨ G2 ⊃ ◦L11. This is still not the exact description of G since
it neither expresses the dependency of the WCRT on signal I, nor the emissions of R, S, T , U. For
instance, if I is present then all threads must take control edges L5 and L7 rather than G1 or G3 which
are blocked. If I is absent then both G1 and G3 must be taken instead. As a result the longest path
v1 + v2 + v3 + v5 + v6 + v7 with delay 6 is not executable. To capture this, we consider signal I as another
control input and refine the WCRT interface type of G:
[5, 5, 3, 4, 3, 1] : (G0 ∧ I) ∨ (G0 ∧ ¬I) ∨ (G1 ∧ I) ∨ (G1 ∧ ¬I) ∨ G3 ∨ G2 ⊃ ◦L11.
(22)
The inclusion of signal I in the interface has now resulted in the distinction of two different delay values
3 and 4 for G1 ⊃ ◦L11 depending on whether I is present or absent. On the other hand, G0, split into
controls G0 ∧ I and G0 ∧ ¬I, produces the same delay of 5 ics in both cases, which is a decrease of
WCRT compared to [6] : G0 ⊃ ◦L11 from above. Assuming that input signal I is causally stable, i.e.,
I ⊕ ¬I ∼
= true, it is possible to optimise the interface without losing precision: since (G0 ∧ I) ⊕ (G0 ∧
¬I) ∼
G0
∧ (I ⊕ ¬I) ∼
=
= G0 ∧ true ∼
= G0 the column vector [0; 0] : G0 ⊃ ◦(G0 ∧ I) ⊕ ◦(G0 ∧ ¬I) is sound
and can be used to compress the two entries of value 5 in (22) into a single value 5 = max(5, 5) giving
[5, 3, 4, 3, 1] : G0 ∨ (G1 ∧ I) ∨ (G1 ∧ ¬I) ∨ G3 ∨ G2 ⊃ ◦L11. In the same vein, but this time without
referring to stability, we could further bundle G1 ∧ I and G3 into a single control with the single delay
[3] : (G1 ∧ I) ⊕ G3 ⊃ ◦L11 at the same level of precision. This finally yields [5, 3, 4, 1] : G0 ∨ ((G1 ∧ I) ⊕
G3) ∨ (G1 ∧ ¬I) ∨ G2 ⊃ ◦L11. Still, if we only ever intend to use G as an encapsulated block with entry
G0 and exit L11 the following typing is sufficient:
[5] : G0 ⊃ ◦L11.
(23)
Now we take a look at the sequential control flow which starts and terminates in pause and halt
nodes. Consider the sub-module H from Fig. 2a consisting of nodes v8 –v15 . Nodes wabort, emit, goto,
present, nothing are transient and specified as before for G. But now the instantaneous paths are broken
by the delay nodes v9 and v13 .
First, consider the pause node v9 . It can be entered by two controls, line number L12 and program
label H3, and left via two exits, a non-instantaneous edge L13 and an instantaneous exit H1 (weak
abortion). When a control thread enters v9 then either it terminates the current instant inside the node or
leaves through the weak abort H1 (data-dependent, if signal I is present) continuing the current reaction,
instantaneously. A thread entering v9 never exits through L13 in the same instant. On the other hand, if
44
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
a thread is started (resumed) from inside the pause node v9 then control can only exit through L13. This
suggests to specify the pause node as follows:
[1; 1, 1; 1] : H3 ∨ L12 ⊃ ◦H1 ⊕ ◦in(v9 )
[1] : out(v9 ) ⊃ ◦L13.
(24)
(25)
The interface (24) says that if pause is entered through H3 or L12 it can be left through H1 or terminate
(in) inside the pause. In all cases activation takes 1 instruction cycle. Since there are no differences
in the delays we could bundle the controls H3, L12 and compress the matrix (24) as [1] : H3 ⊕ L12 ⊃
◦(H1 ⊕ in(v9 )) without losing information. We could also record the dependency of control on signal I,
with the more precise interface [1; −∞, −∞, 1] : ((H3 ⊕ L12) ∧ I) ∨ ((H3 ⊕ L12) ∧ ¬I) ⊃ ◦H1 ⊕ ◦in(v9 ).
This separates the threads which must stop inside the pause from those which must leave via H1 due
to a weak immediate abort on signal I. The specification (25) accounts for threads starting in the pause
which must necessarily pass control to L13 within one instruction cycle.
The halt node v13 in Fig. 2a is not only a sink for control threads entering through L16 but it also
has an internal path of length 1 (which is repeated at every instant). It is specified by the interface
[1, 1] : (out(v13 ) ∨ L16) ⊃ ◦in(v13 ). By composition from the WCRT interfaces of nodes v12 –v15 using
matrix multiplications in max-plus algebra we get
H = [5; 4, 7; 6] : H0 ∨ out(H) ⊃ ◦L19 ⊕ ◦in(H)
(26)
recording the lengths of the longest through path v8 + v9 + v12 + v14 + v15 , sink path v8 + v9 + v12 + v13 ,
source path v9 + v10 + v11 + v9 + v12 + v14 + v15 and internal path v9 + v10 + v11 + v9 + v12 + v13 .
Multi-threading Composition: Fork and Join. Finally, consider the two blocks G and H as they are
combined inside the Esterel module T (Fig. 2a) and synchronised by fork and join nodes v0 and v16 . The
main thread starts G and H in their initial controls, i.e., by activating G0 ∧ H0. Then, the executions
of G and H are interleaved, depending on the priorities assigned by the compiler about which we shall
make no assumptions. Child thread G can only run through its instantaneous path until it reaches L11
where it is stopped by the join. The sequential block H has two options: It can take its instantaneous
through path stopping at L19 or it pauses in one of its delay nodes. In the former case we have reached
L11 ∧ L19, where the synchronising join takes over letting the main thread continue by instantaneously
activating L20 within the same instant. In the latter case we have activated L11 ∧ in(H) where the
synchronous instant is finished and the combined system pauses. Activation is resumed in the next
instant from L11 ∧ out(H), while G is still inactive and waiting at L11. Child thread H may either leave
instantaneously through L19, giving L11 ∧ L19 overall, or once more pause internally, leading again to
L11 ∧ in(H).
This synchronous composition is obtained by the Kronecker product GH =d f G0 ⊗ H 0 where G0 and
H 0 are the stand-alone interfaces of G (23) and H (26) instrumented for the synchronisation:
G0 = Sync1 ∧ [5, 0] : G0 ∨ L11 ⊃ ◦L11
H 0 = Sync2 ∧ [5; 4, 7; 6] : H0 ∨ out(H) ⊃ ◦L19 ⊕ ◦in(H).
G is extended by the additional input control L11 and trivial path [0] : L11 ⊃ ◦L11 to let G start an instant
from L11 when H is pausing. The conjunct Sync1 =d f ¬L11 expresses the synchronisation whereby G
finishes once it reaches L11. Similarly, the conjunct Sync2 =d f ¬(L19⊕in(H)) added to the interface (26)
Michael Mendler
45
stops H from continuing its activation instant past L11 or in(H). The Kronecker product G0 ⊗ H 0 now
generates all possible interleaving of activations specified by type G0 with those from type H 0 :
G0 ⊗ H 0 [5, 0] ⊗ [5; 4, 7; 6] = [5 · [5; 4, 7; 6], 0 · [5; 4, 7; 6]] = [10; 9, 12; 11, 5; 4, 7; 6]
: (G0 ∧ H0) ∨ (G0 ∧ out(H)) ∨ (L11 ∧ H0) ∨ (L11 ∧ out(H)) ⊃ ◦(L11 ∧ L19) ⊕ ◦(L11 ∧ in(H)).
In the synchronised composition GH we are only interested in the (surface) paths initiated by G0 ∧ H0
and the (depth) paths activated by the combination L11 ∧ out(H). All other paths cannot be activated
inside the fork and join context. Thus, we drop these column vectors and only continue with
GH = [10; 9, 12; 11, 5; 4, 7; 6] · [0; −∞; −∞; −∞, −∞; −∞; −∞, 0] = [10; 9, 7; 6]
: (G0 ∧ H0) ∨ (L11 ∧ out(H)) ⊃ ◦(L11 ∧ L19) ⊕ ◦(L11 ∧ in(H)).
This models the concurrent composition of G and H but not yet the interface of the composite block T
with fork and join as depicted in Fig. 2a. These are additional components specified as
join =[1; −∞, −∞; 1] : (L11 ∧ L19) ∨ (L11 ∧ in(H)) ⊃ ◦L20 ⊕ ◦in(T )
fork =[3; −∞, −∞; 0] : T 0 ∨ out(T ) ⊃ ◦(G0 ∧ H0) ⊕ ◦(L11 ∧ out(H))
with new state controls in(T ) and out(T ) for module T . The JOIN instruction in line 19 of Fig. 2c is
always executed upon termination of both threads from G and H inside T and the associated activation
time of one ic is accounted for in the join interface above. Specifically, this is a through path [1] :
(L11 ∧ L19) ⊃ ◦L20 and source path [1] : L11 ∧ in(H) ⊃ ◦in(T ). The entry [3] : T 0 ⊃ ◦(G0 ∧ H0) of fork
includes the ics for two PAR, one PARE from lines 1-3 of Fig. 2c. Adding fork and join on the input and
output side then obtains
T = [1; −∞, −∞; 1] · [10; 9, 7; 6] · [3; −∞, −∞; 0] = [14; 13, 8; 7] : T 0 ∨ out(T ) ⊃ ◦L20 ⊕ ◦in(T )
for the composite module T . Indeed, the longest through path is exemplified by the sequence of nodes
v0 (3) + {v1 + v2 + v3 + v4 + v7 }G (5) + {v8 + v9 + v12 + v14 + v15 }H (5) + v16 (1) = 14. A longest sink path
is v0 (3) + {v1 + v2 + v3 + v4 + v7 }G (5) + {v8 + v9 + v12 + v13 }H (4) + v16 (1) = 13. As a maximal source
path we could take {}G (0) + {v9 + v10 + v11 + v9 + v12 + v14 + v15 }H (7) + v16 (1) = 8 and as a possible
longest internal path {}G (0) + {v9 + v10 + v11 + v9 + v12 + v13 }H (6) + v16 (1) = 7.
In specific WCRT algorithms such as the one of [6] many of the matrix multiplications shown above
are executed efficiently in the combinatorics of traversing the program’s control flow graph forming
maximum and additions as we go along. This is possible only so far as control flow dependencies
are represented explicitly in the graph. In general, with data-dependencies, this may be an exponential
problem so that symbolic techniques for modular analyses are needed. Our logical interface algebra can
be used to keep track of the semantic meaning of WCRT data. Even without data-dependencies, the
WCRT interfaces presented here give rise to a depth-first search algorithm [22] which is already more
precise than the one presented in [6].
6
Related Work
Most interface models in synchronous programming are restricted to causality issues, i. e., dependency
analysis without considering quantitative time. Moreover, the granularity of dependency is limited. E.g.,
the modules of André et al. [3] do not permit instantaneous interaction. Such a model is not suitable
46
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
for compositional, intra-instant, scheduling analysis. Hainque et al. [9] use a topological abstraction
of the underlying circuit graphs (or syntactic structure of Boolean equations) to derive a fairly rigid
component dependency model. A component is assumed executable iff all of its inputs are available;
after component execution all of its outputs become defined. This is fine for concurrent execution but
too restricted to model single- or multi-threaded execution compositionally. The interface model also
does not cover data dependencies and thus cannot deal with dynamic schedules. It also does not support
quantitative resource information, either.
The causality interfaces of Lee et al. [17] are much more flexible. These are functions associating
with every pair of input and output ports an element of a dependency domain D, which expresses if and
how an output depends on some input. Causality analysis is then performed by multiplication on the
global system matrix. Using an appropriate dioid structure D, one can perform the analyses of Hainque
et. al. [9] as well as restricted forms of WCRT. Lee’s interfaces presuppose a fixed static distinction
between inputs and outputs and cannot express the difference between an output depending on the joint
presence of several values as opposed to depending with each input individually. Similarly, there is no
coupling of outputs, e. g., that two outputs always occur together at “the same time.” Thus, they do
not support full AND- and OR-type synchronisation dependencies for representing multi-threading and
multi-processing. Also, the model does not include data dependency. The work reported here can be seen
as an extension of [17] to include such features. In particular, note that our scheduling interfaces can also
be used in situations where linear algebra is not applicable, as in the case of network flow problems.
Recent works [27, 13] combining network calculus [4, 7] with real-time interfaces are concerned
with the compositional modelling of regular execution patterns. Existing interface theories [17, 27, 13],
which aim at the verification of resource constraints for real-time scheduling, handle timing properties
such as task execution latency, arrival rates, resource utilisation, throughput, accumulated cost of context
switches, and so on. The dependency on data and control flow is largely abstracted. For instance,
since the task sequences of Henzinger and Matic [13] are independent of each other, their interfaces
do not model concurrent forking and joining of threads. The causality expressible there is even more
restricted than that by Lee et al. [17] in that it permits only one-to-one associations of inputs with outputs.
The interfaces of Wandeler and Thiele [27] for modular performance analysis in real-time calculus are
like those of Henzinger and Matic [13] but without sequential composition of tasks and thus do not
model control flow. On the other hand, the approaches [27, 13] can describe continuous and higher-level
stochastic properties which our interface types cannot.
AND- and OR-type synchronisation dependencies are important for synchronous programming since
reachability of control nodes in general depends both conjunctively and disjunctively on the presence
of data. Also, control branching may be conjunctive (as in multi-threading or concurrent execution)
or disjunctive (as in single-threaded code). Moreover, execution may depend on the absence of data
(negative triggering conditions), which makes compositional modelling rather a delicate matter in the
presence of logical feedback loops. This severely limits the applicability of existing interface models.
The assume-guarantee style specification [27, 13] does not address causality issues arising from feedback
and negative triggering conditions. The interface automata of Alfaro, Henzinger, Lee, Xiong [1, 15]
model synchronous macro-states and assume that all stabilisation processes (sequences of micro-states)
can be abstracted into atomic interaction labels. The introduction of transient states [16] alleviates
this, but the focus is still on regular (scheduling) behaviour. The situation is different, however, for
cyclic systems, in which causality information is needed. Our interface algebra is semantically sound
with respect to feedback and indeed supports causality analysis as a special case: A signal A is causal
if ◦A ⊕ ¬A can be derived in the type theory of a module. Because of the complications arising from
causality issues, there is currently no robust component model for synchronous programming. We believe
Michael Mendler
47
that the interface types introduced in this paper, cover new ground towards such a theory.
Finally, note that our algebra is not intended as a general purpose interface model such as, e.g., the
relational interfaces of Tripakis et al. [26]. While these relational interfaces permit contracts in firstorder logic between inputs and outputs, our interfaces only describe propositional relations. Therefore,
our algebra cannot describe the full functional behaviour of data processing (other than by coding it
into finite Booleans). Our interfaces are logically restricted to express monotonic scheduling processes
and the resource consumption inside synchronous instants. Because we use an intuitionistic realisability
semantics (Curry-Howard) we obtain enough expressiveness to deal with causality problems and upperbound scheduling costs. The interface algebra does not aim to cover behavioural aspects of sequences
of instants such as in approaches based on temporal logics or the timed interfaces of Alfaro, Henzinger
and Stoelinga [2], which build on timed automata. The scheduling problem addressed here is a simpler
problem in the sense that it arises afresh within each synchronous step and does not need to carry (e.g.,
timing) constraints across steps. However, note that our algebra can fully capture finite-state sequential
transition functions in the standard way by duplicating propositional state variables s using out(s) and
in(s) as seen in Sec. 5. An inter-instant transition (instantaneous, no clock tick) between s1 and s2 is
given by the implication out(s1 ) ⊃ ◦in(s2 ) while the intra-instant transition (sequential, upon clock tick)
is the weak implication ¬in(s1 ) ⊕ out(s2 ). In this way, we can derive exact state-dependent worst-case
bounds across all reachable states of a finite state behaviour.
The scheduling algebra in this paper extends [21] in that it not only captures concurrent execution
(as in combinational circuits) but also includes the tensor ⊗ for multi-threading. More subtly, while [21]
is restricted to properties of activation sequences stable under the suffix preordering, here we consider
the much richer lattice of arbitrary sub-sequences. This paper introduces the theory behind [22] which
reported on the application to WCRT analysis for Esterel and also provides more detailed information on
the modelling in Sec. 5.
Acknowledgements. The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions to
improve the presentation.
References
[1] L. de Alfaro & T. Henzinger (2001): Interface automata. In: Proc. Foundations of Software Engineering,
ACM Press, pp. 109–120.
[2] L. de Alfaro, Th. Henzinger & Marielle Stoelinga (2002): Timed interfaces. In: Proc. EMSOFT’02.
[3] C. André, F. Boulanger, M.-A. Péraldi, J. P. Rigault & G. Vidal-Naquet (1997): Objects and synchronous
programming. European Journal on Automated Systems 31(3), pp. 417–432.
[4] F. L. Baccelli, G. Cohen, G. J. Olsder & J.-P. Quadrat (1992): Synchronisation and Linearity. John Wiley &
Sons.
[5] Gérard Berry & Georges Gonthier (1992): The Esterel synchronous programming language: Design, semantics, implementation. Science of Computer Programming 19(2), pp. 87–152.
[6] Marian Boldt, Claus Traulsen & Reinhard von Hanxleden (2008): Worst case reaction time analysis of concurrent reactive programs. ENTCS 203(4), pp. 65–79. Proc. SLA++P’07, March 2007, Braga, Portugal.
[7] J. Le Boudec & P. Thiran (2001): Network Calculus - A theory of deterministic queuing systems for the
internet, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2050. Springer.
[8] Paul Le Guernic, Thierry Goutier, Michel Le Borgne & Claude Le Maire (1991): Programming real time
applications with SIGNAL. Proceedings of the IEEE 79(9).
48
An Algebra of Synchronous Scheduling Interfaces
[9] Olivier Hainque, Laurent Pautet, Yann Le Biannic & Eric Nassor (1999): Cronos: A separate compilation
toolset for modular Esterel applications. In: Jeannette M. Wing, Jim Woodcock & Jim Davies, editors: World
Congress on Formal Methods, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1709, Springer, pp. 1836–1853.
[10] Nicolas Halbwachs (1998): Synchronous programming of reactive systems, a tutorial and commented bibliography. In: Tenth International Conference on Computer-Aided Verification, CAV ’98, LNCS 1427,
Springer Verlag, Vancouver (B.C.).
[11] Nicolas Halbwachs (2005): A synchronous language at work: The story of Lustre. In: Third ACM-IEEE
International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Codesign, MEMOCODE’05, Verona, Italy.
[12] D. Harel, A. Pnueli, J. Pruzan-Schmidt & R. Sherman (1987): On the formal semantics of Statecharts. In:
LICS ’87, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 54–64.
[13] Th. Henzinger & S. Matic (2006): An interface algebra for real-time components. In: Proceedings of the
12th Annual Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS), IEEE Computer
Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 253–266.
[14] C. Huizing (1991): Semantics of Reactive Systems: Comparison and Full Abstraction. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology.
[15] E. A. Lee & Y. Xiong (2001): System-level types for component-based design. In: Workshop on Embedded
Software EMSOFT 2001, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA.
[16] E. A. Lee & Y. Xiong (2004): A behavioral type system and its application in Ptolemy II. Formal Aspects of
Computing 13(3), pp. 210–237.
[17] E. A. Lee, H. Zheng & Y. Zhou (2005): Causality interfaces and compositional causality analysis. In:
Foundations of Interface Technologies (FIT’05), ENTCS, Elsevier.
[18] Xin Li, Marian Boldt & Reinhard von Hanxleden (2006): Mapping Esterel onto a multi-threaded embedded
processor. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming
Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS’06), San Jose, CA.
[19] Xin Li & Reinhard von Hanxleden (2010): Multi-threaded reactive programming—The Kiel Esterel processor. IEEE Transactions on Computers .
[20] G. Luettgen & M. Mendler (2002): The intuitionism behind Statecharts steps. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 3(1), pp. 1–41.
[21] M. Mendler (2000): Characterising combinational timing analyses in intuitionistic modal logic. The Logic
Journal of the IGPL 8(6), pp. 821–853.
[22] Michael Mendler, Reinhard von Hanxleden & Claus Traulsen (2009): WCRT algebra and interfaces for
Esterel-style synchronous processing. In: Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe
(DATE’09), Nice, France.
[23] Amir Pnueli & M. Shalev (1991): What is in a step: On the semantics of Statecharts. In: TACS ’91:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software, Springer-Verlag,
London, UK, pp. 244–264.
[24] Marc Pouzet (2006): Lucid Synchrone, version 3. Tutorial and reference manual. Université Paris-Sud, LRI.
Distribution available at: www.lri.fr/∼pouzet/lucid-synchrone.
[25] Klaus Schneider (2002): Proving the equivalence of microstep and macrostep semantics. In: TPHOLs ’02:
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, SpringerVerlag, London, UK, pp. 314–331.
[26] S. Tripakis, B. Lickly, Th. A. Henzinger & E. A. Lee (2009): On relational interfaces. Technical Report
UCB/EECS-2009-60, Electrical Enginering and Computer Sciences, Univ. of California at Berkely.
[27] E. Wandeler & L. Thiele (2005): Real-time interfaces for interface-based design of real-time systems with
fixed priority scheduling. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Embedded Software
(EMSOFT’05).
| 6cs.PL
|
arXiv:0912.4877v1 [cs.PL] 24 Dec 2009
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 86 No. 2 (2003)
14 pages
Typing rule-based transformations over
topological collections
Julien Cohen
1
LaMI, U.M.R. 8042
CNRS – Université d’Évry Val d’Essonne
523 place des Terrasses de l’Agora
91000 Évry, France
Abstract
Pattern-matching programming is an example of a rule-based programming style developed in functional
languages. This programming style is intensively used in dialects of ML but is restricted to algebraic
data-types.
This restriction limits the field of application. However, as shown by [9] at RULE’02, case-based function
definitions can be extended to more general data structures called topological collections. We show in this
paper that this extension retains the benefits of the typed discipline of the functional languages. More
precisely, we show that topological collections and the rule-based definition of functions associated with
them fit in a polytypic extension of mini-ML where type inference is still possible.
1
Introduction
Pattern-matching on algebraic data-types (ADT) allows the definition of functions
by cases, a restricted form of rule based programming that is both relevant and powerful to specify function acting on ADTs. ML adopted a restricted form of pattern
matching, where only the top-level structure of an ADT is matched against the pattern [15]. Examples of more expressive patterns are given, e.g., by the Mathematica
language. However, both ML-like language or Mathematica are restricted to the
handling of terms, that is, tree-shaped data structures (sets or multisets handled in
Mathematica are represented by terms modulo associativity and commutativity).
In [9] and [8] a framework where pattern matching can be expressed uniformly
on many different data structures is exhibited. They rely on the notion of topological collection which embeds a neighborhood relation over its elements. The
neighborhood relation enables the definition of a general notion of path (a sequential specification of a sub-structure); a pattern is used to specify a path that selects
1 The author is grateful to Olivier Michel and Jean-Louis Giavitto of the MGS Project for their valuable
support.
Cohen
an arbitrary sub-collection to be substituted. This leads to a general functional
language where the pattern matching is not limited to ADTs.
We show in this paper that the topological collections bring a smooth extension
of the Hindley-Milner type system [10][14] with some polytypism [12] and we suggest
an extension of the Damas-Milner type inference algorithm that allows to find a type
to programs expressed in an extension of mini-ML with topological collections and
rule based transformations over them.
Section 2 gives a brief description of the topological collections and their transformation; section 3 gives an overview of types in this framework; the types are
investigated in section 4 where the typing rules and the inference algorithm are
given; several direct extensions of the language are discussed in section 5 and section 6 concludes this paper.
2
Topological Collections and Transformations
Topological collections are data structures corresponding conceptually to a mapping
from a set of positions into a set of values such that there is a neighborhood relation
over the positions. Two values of a collection are said to be neighbors if their
positions are neighbors. The sequence is an example of topological collection where
the elements have at most a left neighbor and a right neighbor. The NEWS grid
which is a generalization of arrays of dimension 2 is another example where each
element has at most four neighbors, considering a Von Neumann neighborhood [13].
The notion of neighborhood is a means to embed in the programming language
the spatial locality of computations of programs.
Many other data structures can be seen from the topological point of view. For
example the set and the multi-set (or bag) are topological collections where each
element is neighbor of each other element (the set of positions of a set, is the set of
the elements itself). See [7] for other examples of topological collections.
These data structures come with a rule based style of programming: a rule defines a local transformation by specifying some elements to be matched and the
corresponding action. The topological disposition of the matched elements is expressed directly within the pattern of the rule. Thus a collection can be transformed
by the simultaneous application of local transformations to non-intersecting matching sub-sets of the collection.
The MGS programming language described in [7] and [8] supplies the topological
collections as first-class values and transformations as a means to describe rule based
functions over collections. The language we work on in our paper is largely inspired
by MGS although some features such as the possibility for a collection to contain
elements of different types have been left out.
In the rest of this section we describe the handling of collections via rules in our
restriction of MGS.
A rule is written p=>e where p is the pattern and e is the expression that will
replace the instances of p. A transformation is a list of rules introduced by the
keyword trans. The application of a transformation trans[p1 =>e1 ; p2 =>e2 ] to a
2
Cohen
collection c consists in selecting a number of non-intersecting occurrences of p1 in c
such that there is no further possible occurrence; then replacing the selected parts
by the appropriate elements calculated from e1 ; then selecting a number of nonintersecting occurrences of p2 and replacing them with the appropriate values.
The pattern can be a single element x or a single element satisfying a condition
x/e where e is a boolean expression; it can also be a two elements pattern x, y such
that y is a neighbor of x. Here the comma expresses the neighborhood relation and
is not intended to express a tuple. The pattern x/(x = 0), y/(y = 1), z/(z = 2)
matches three values such that the first is a 0, the second is a 1, the third is a 2,
the second is in the neighborhood of the first and the third is in the neighborhood
of the second.
The right hand side of the rule is composed of an expression denoting the elements replacing the selected elements. In order to allow the replacement of parts
by parts of different size, the value expressed in the right hand side of a rule must
be a sequence. The elements of this sequence will substitute the matched elements.
Thus we can consider rules replacing sub-parts constituted of a single element with
several element, or sub-parts constituted of several elements with one element or
even with no element, and so on.
A way of building a sequence is using the empty sequence empty seq and the
constructor ::. The syntactic shortcut [e] can be used to express e::empty seq.
2.1
Two examples
The following two examples show two programs acting respectively on sequences
and sets.
Sorting a Sequence.
A kind of bubble-sort is immediate:
trans[ x, y/(y<x) => y ::
x ::
empty seq ; x => [x] ]
This two rules transformation has to be applied on the sequence until a fixpoint
is reached. The fixpoint is a sorted sequence.
This is not really the bubble-sort because the swapping of elements can happen
at arbitrary places; hence an out-of-order element does not necessarily bubble to
the top in the characteristic way.
We will see in section 4 that the rule x => [x] is required.
Eratosthene’s Sieve on a Set.
The idea is to apply the transformation on the set of the integers between 2
and n. The transformation replaces an x and an y such that x divides y by x.
The iteration until a fixpoint of this transformation results in the set of the prime
integers less than n.
trans [ x, y/(y mod x = 0) => [x] ; x => [x] ]
3
Cohen
3
Typing the Collections and the Transformations
The type of a topological collection is described by two pieces of information: the
type of the elements inside the collection and its organization. The former is called
its content type and the latter its topology (see [11] for an example of separation
between the shape and the data). For example, a set of integers and a set of strings
do not have the same content type but have the same topology. Collection types
will be denoted by [τ ]ρ where τ is the content type and ρ is the topology. Thus a
set of strings will have the type [string]set.
The usual notion of polymorphism of ML languages is provided on the content
type. For example the cardinal function that returns the number of elements of
a set would have the type [α]set → int where α is a free type variable since it
can be applied to a set irrespectively of the type of its elements. The nature of
the content type does not affect the behavior of the cardinal function, therefore the
polymorphism is said to be uniform on the content type.
Instead of providing different functions that count the number of elements for
each topology, the language provides the function size with the type [α]θ → int
where θ is a free topology variable. Functions that accept any kind of topology are
said to be polytypic [12].
A way of handling collections is using polytypic operators and constant collections: the constructor operator :: has the type α → [α]θ → [α]θ; the destructors
oneof and rest have the type [α]θ → α and [α]θ → [α]θ and are such that for any
collection c, oneof(c) and rest(c) make a partition of c (see [3]).
The constant collections are empty set, empty seq and so on.
Collections can also be handled with transformations. As seen in the previous
section, transformations are functions on collections described by rewriting rules.
This kind of function is introduced by the keyword trans. For example the function
trans [ x=>[x] ] implements the identity over collections and has the type [α]θ →
[α]θ. It is the identity because it maps the identity to all the elements of the
collection.
As we said, the right hand side of a rule must be a sequence because the pattern
matched can be replaced by a different number of elements. On some topologies
such as the grid, the pattern and the replacement sequence must have the same
size. If the sizes are not compatible a structural error will be raised at execution
time. These structural errors are not captured by our type system. See [7] for more
details on the substitution process in the collections.
The map function can be expressed as follows:
fun f -> trans [ x => [f x] ]
and has the type (α → β) → [α]θ → [β]θ.
Unlike in the original MGS language, a collection cannot contain elements of
different types. We have chosen to set this restriction to allow to build an inference
4
Cohen
e
l
::=
id | cte | (e, e) | fun x-> e
|
e e | let id = e in e
|
trans [ l ]
::=
|
id => e
p
::=
id
|
id/e
|
id,p
|
id/e,p
p => e ; l
Fig. 1. Syntax of the language
algorithm in the Damas-Milner style [5]. Allowing such heterogeneous collections
would lead to a system with subsumption and union types that would need complex
techniques to determine the types of a program.
4
The Language
In this section we first describe the syntax of the studied language. Then we describe
the type verification rules and finally we give the type inference algorithm that
computes the principal type of a program.
4.1
Syntax
Topological collections are values manipulated with constants, operators, functions
and transformations, no new syntactic construction is needed.
For the transformation we have to enrich the syntax of mini-ML [4] as shown in
figure 1.
The construction p => e is called a rule and a transformation is a syntactic list
of rules. In the construction id/e occurring in a pattern, e is called a guard.
The last rule of a transformation must be a variable for exhaustiveness purpose.
Putting the rule x => [x] in last position of a transformation expresses that all
unmatched values are left unmodified. It is not possible to infer a relevant default
case for a transformation. For example the rule x => [x] cannot be the default case
for a transformation of the type [string]θ → [int]θ. Therefore the default case must
be specified explicitly by the programmer. This explains the grammar for the list of
rules l which enforces the presence of a last rule of the form id => e matching every
remaining element. The expression e in the right hand side provides the appropriate
default value.
We will use some operators such as :: in an infix position but this syntax can
be easily transformed into the one of figure 1. Operators are functional constants
of the language.
5
Cohen
4.2
The Type System
Types Algebra
We enrich the polymorphic type system of mini-ML with the topological collections.
The collection type introduces a new kind of construction in types: the topology.
From a type point of view, transformations are just functions that act on topological collections without changing their topology, so no new construct is needed
for them in the type algebra.
Types :
Topologies :
τ ::=
T
base type (int, float, bool, string)
|
α
type variables
|
τ →τ
functions
|
τ ×τ
tuples
|
[τ ]ρ
collections
ρ ::=
R
base topology (bag, set, seq, grid, ...)
|
θ
topology variables
We give in appendix A the definitions of Lt and Lr which calculate the type
variables and the topology variables occurring in a type.
Type Schemes
A type scheme is a type quantified over some type variables and some topology
variables:
σ ::= ∀[α1 , . . . , αn ][θ1 , . . . , θm ].τ
A type τ is an instance of a type scheme σ = ∀[α1 , . . . , αn ][θ1 , . . . , θm ].τ ′ and
we write σ ≤ τ if and only if there are some types τ1 , . . . , τn and some topologies
ρ1 , . . . , ρm such that τ = τ ′ [α1 τ1 , . . . , αn τn , θ1 ρ1 , . . . , θm ρm ] .
In the following, an environment is a function from identifiers to type schemes.
T C is the function that gives the type scheme of the constants of the language.
For example T C(::) is ∀[α][θ].α → [α]θ → [α]θ.
Lt and Lr are extended to type schemes and calculate the free variables of a type
scheme, that is the variables occurring in the type scheme which are not bound by
the quantifier. For example if σ is ∀[α1 ][θ1 ].[α1 ]θ1 → [α2 ]θ2 then Lt (σ) is α2 and
Lr (σ) is θ2 .
Typing Rules
The typing rules are nearly the same as the Hindley-Milner rules [10][14]. The
differences are that a rule has been added for the transformations and that the
notions of instance and the Gen function have been adapted to the type algebra.
The Gen function transforms a type into a type scheme by quantifying the
variables that are free in the type and that are not bound in the current environment.
6
Cohen
The definition of Gen is the following:
Gen(τ, Γ) = ∀[α1 , . . . , αn ][θ1 , . . . , θm ].τ with {α1 , . . . , αn } = Lt (τ )\Lt (Γ) and
{θ1 , . . . , θm } = Lr (τ )\Lr (Γ).
The typing rules are:
Γ(x) ≤ τ
(var − inst)
Γ⊢x:τ
T C(c) ≤ τ
(const − inst)
Γ⊢c:τ
Γ ⊢ e1 : τ ′ → τ Γ ⊢ e2 : τ ′
(app)
Γ ⊢ e1 e2 : τ
Γ ∪ {x : τ1 } ⊢ e : τ2
(f un)
Γ ⊢ (fun x → e) : τ1 → τ2
Γ ⊢ e1 : τ1 Γ ∪ {x : Gen(τ1 , Γ)} ⊢ e2 : τ2
(let)
Γ ⊢ (let x = e1 in e2 ) : τ2
˘
¯
Γ ∪ {xji : τ }(j≤mi ) ∪ {self : [τ ]ρ} ⊢ ei : [τ ′ ]seq (i≤n)
˘
¯
Γ ∪ {xji : τ }(j≤k) ∪ {self : [τ ]ρ} ⊢ eki : bool (i≤n),(k≤m
)
i
(trans)
m1
mn
mn
1
1
1
′
Γ ⊢ trans [x11 /e11 ,...,xm
1 /e1 =>e1 ;...;xn /en ,...,xn /en =>en ] : [τ ]ρ → [τ ]ρ
In the (trans) rule, kn is always equal to 1 and e1n is always equal to true.
Inside a rule the self identifier refers to the collection the transformation is
applied on.
The (trans) rule expresses that a transformation has the type [τ ]ρ → [τ ′ ]ρ if
when you suppose that all the xji have the same type τ and that self has the type
[τ ]ρ it can be proven that the eji are boolean values and that the ei have the type
[τ ′ ]seq.
We can see that if self is not used in a transformation, this one will be polytypic
since ρ will not be bound to any topology.
The following examples show a type verification on a polytypic transformation
and on a non-polytypic one.
Polytypic Example
The following transformation can be proven to be an [int]θ → [int]θ function for
any topology θ.
trans [ x, y/x>y => x ::
y ::
(x-y) ::
empty seq ; x => [x] ]
The proof is given in figure 2a where Γ0 = {x : int; y : int; self : [int]θ},
Γ1 = {x : int; self : [int]θ} and with the following lemmas:
Γ ⊢ e1 : int Γ ⊢ e2 : [int]seq
Γ ⊢ e1 ::e2 : [int]seq
Γ⊢e:τ
Γ ⊢ [e] : [τ ]seq
Non-Polytypic Example
The operator is left acts as a predicate that returns true if the element is at
the left extremity of the sequence. Thus it returns false is the element has a left
7
...
...
Γ2 (x) ≤ int
T C(not) ≤ bool → bool
Γ2 ⊢ not : bool → bool Γ2 ⊢ not(is left x self) : bool
Γ2 ⊢ x+(left x self) : int
Γ2 ⊢ x : int
Γ2 ⊢ not(is left x self) : bool
Γ2 ⊢ [x+(left x self)] : [int]seq Γ2 ⊢ [x] : [int]seq
⊢ trans [ x/(not(is left x self))=>[x+(left x self)] ; x=>[x] ] : [int]seq → [int]seq
(b)
Cohen
8
Fig. 2. Two examples of type verification
Γ0 (x) ≤ int
...
Γ1 (x) ≤ int
...
Γ0 ⊢ x : int Γ0 ⊢ y::(x-y)::empty seq : [int]seq
Γ1 ⊢ x : int
Γ0 ⊢ x>y : bool
Γ0 ⊢ x::y::(x-y)::empty seq : [int]seq
Γ1 ⊢ [x] : [int]seq
⊢ trans [ x,y/x>y => x::y::(x-y)::empty seq ; x=>[x] ] : [int]θ → [int]θ
Cohen
neighbor. It can be used only within a transformation 2 and takes two arguments:
the first is a pattern variable and the second is a collection. Similarly, the operator
left takes a pattern variable x and a sequence s and returns the left neighbor of x
in s.
Let us consider the following transformation:
trans [ x/(not (is left x self)) => [x+(left x self)] ; x=>[x] ]
This transformation does not have the same effect as the following one:
trans [ l, x => (l ::
l+x ::
empty seq) ; x=>[x] ]
because in the former, every element x of the sequence except the leftmost one will
be replaced by the sum of itself and its left neighbor whereas in the latter, the l
element will be replaced by itself and thus will not be increased. For example the
former transformation applied to the sequence (1::2::3::4::empty seq) results
in (1::3::5::7::empty seq) whereas the application of the latter transformation
to the same sequence would result in (1::4::3::7::emty seq).
The figure 2b where Γ2 = {x : int; self : [int]seq} proves that the first transformation has the type [int]seq → [int]seq.
This transformation cannot be proven to have the type [int]ρ → [int]ρ if ρ 6= seq
because left and is left act exclusively on sequences.
4.3
Type Inference
The typing rules given in section 4.2 are a means to verify that a program has a
given type but this type is a parameter of the verification procedure. We now give
the equivalent of the Damas-Milner type inference that enables the full automated
type verification since it computes the principal type of a program. The resulting
type is said to be principal because every type that can fit the program is an instance
of this type.
The type inference algorithm is given after the unification procedure.
Unification
Unifying two types τ1 and τ2 consists in finding a substitution ϕ over the free
variables of τ1 and τ2 called the unifier such that ϕ(τ1 ) = ϕ(τ2 ).
A substitution is a most general unifier (mgu) for two types τ1 and τ2 if for any
unifier ϕ1 of τ1 and τ2 , there is a substitution ϕ2 such that ϕ = ϕ2 ◦ ϕ1 .
We give the mgu function that computes the most general unifier of a set of
pairs of types denoted by τ1 = τ2 . This function is necessary to the type inference
procedure. If mgu fails then there is no unifier for the given types.
The difference between our mgu and Damas and Milner’s original mgu is the
addition of the case for the collection types. Two collection types are unified by
unifying their content types and their topologies. The substitution doing this unifi2 The is left operator is only available in transformations, where the identifiers introduced by the pattern
are bound to a position in the collection. Allowing only such identifiers to be arguments of is left allows
to remove any ambiguity on the position denoted in the sequence, even if the position contains a value
occurring several times.
9
Cohen
cation is found as ϕ1 ◦ ϕ2 where ϕ2 unifies the topologies and ϕ1 unifies the content
types. The computation of ϕ2 is made by the dedicated mgur function. This function fails when the two topologies are different base topologies since they cannot be
unified. The substitution ϕ2 is applied to the content types before computing ϕ1
with mgu.
The standard cases of the definition of mgu are:
mgu ∅
= []
mgu {τ = τ } ∪ C)
=
mgu(C)
mgu {α = τ } ∪ C) (if α is not free in τ )
=
let ϕ = [α
mgu {τ = α} ∪ C) (if α is not free in τ )
mgu {τ1 → τ2 = τ1′ → τ2′ } ∪ C
mgu {τ1 × τ2 = τ1′ × τ2′ } ∪ C
=
τ ] in mgu(ϕ(C)) ◦ ϕ
mgu {τ1 = τ ′ 1 ; τ2 = τ ′ 2} ∪ C
mgu {τ1 = τ ′ 1 ; τ2 = τ ′ 2} ∪ C
=
=
τ ] in mgu(ϕ(C)) ◦ ϕ
let ϕ = [α
The new case for the collections is:
mgu {[τ ]ρ = [τ ′ ]ρ′ } ∪ C
= let ϕ = mgur (ρ = ρ′ ) in mgu ϕ {τ = τ ′ } ∪ C ◦ ϕ
The unification of topologies is defined by:
mgur (ρ = ρ)
=
[]
mgur (θ = ρ)
=
[θ
ρ]
mgur (ρ = θ)
=
[θ
ρ]
Type Inference
The type reconstruction algorithm is nearly the same as the Damas-Milner one. The
differences are that it uses specialized versions of mgu and Gen functions and that
there is a new case for the transformations. It is described here in an imperative
way: ϕ is the current substitution and Vt and Vr are sets of free type variables and
topology variables.
The algorithm is given in figure 3.
The case for the transformations consists in unifying the types of all the pattern
variables and unifying the types of the right hand side rules together and with a
sequence collection type. These unifications have to be made with respect to the
guards that are boolean values.
If W succeeds it computes the most general type of the program analyzed and
this one can be run without type error. If it fails because of an mgu or an mgur
failure then the program is ill-typed and might lead to a type error at execution
time.
10
Cohen
fresh t
=
fresh r
=
let α ∈ Vt
do Vt Vt \{α}
return α
let θ ∈ Vr
do Vr
Vr \{θ}
return θ
W (Γ ⊢ e) =
(* original cases *)
If e = x
let ∀[α1 , . . . , αn ][θ1 , ..., θm ].τ = Γ(x)
let α′1 , . . . , α′n = fresh t, . . . , fresh t
′ = fresh r, . . . , fresh r
let θ1′ , . . . , θm
return τ [α1 α′1 , . . . , αn α′n , θ1 θ1′ , . . . , θm
If e = fun x → e
let α = fresh t
let τ = W (Γ ∪ x : ∀[ ][ ].α ⊢ e)
return α → τ
If e = e1 e2
let τ1 = W (Γ ⊢ e1 )
let τ2 = W (Γ ⊢ e2 )
let α = fresh t
do ϕ mgu(ϕ(τ1 ) = ϕ(τ2 → α)) ◦ ϕ
If e = let x = e1 in e2
let τ1 = W (Γ ⊢ e1 )
let σ = Gen(ϕ(τ1 ), ϕ(Γ))
return W (Γ ∪ {x : σ} ⊢ e2 )
′ ]
θm
(* new case for the transformations *)
If e = trans [p1 =>e1 ; ...; pn =>en ]
let α, β = fresh t, fresh t
let θ = fresh r
for i = 1..n
mi
i
let id1i /e1i , . . . , idm
= pi
i /ei
for j = 1..mi`
let τij = W Γ ∪ {self : [α]θ} ∪ {idki : α}k≤j ⊢ eji )
`
do ϕ mgu {ϕ(τij ) = bool}) ◦ ϕ
´
`
let τi = W Γ ∪ {self : [α]θ} ∪ {idki : α}k≤mi ⊢ ei
`
´
do ϕ mgu {ϕ(τi ) = ϕ([β]seq)} ◦ ϕ
return [α]θ → [β]θ
Fig. 3. Type inference algorithm
5
Extensions
5.1
Repetition in a Pattern
The star * expressing an arbitrary repetition of a sub-pattern during the matching
process has been introduced in [9]. The pattern x/(x=0), * as y, z/(z=0) for
example can match an arbitrary subcollection such that it contains two 0 and that
there is a path between these 0. This means that one can reach the second 0 from
the first one only by going from an element to one of its neighbors repetitively.
To take the star into account we modify the syntax of the patterns as follows:
p ::= q | q, p
q ::= id | ∗ as id
where q stands for elementary patterns.
We have not kept the guards in the elementary patterns in order to keep the
11
Cohen
formulas readable but their addition does not lead to new problems.
The elements matched by the star are named and can be referred to as a sequence.
The star could have been considered as a repetition of a subpattern as in
(x,y/x=y)* but we have chosen to restrict the star to the repetition of single elements for the sake of simplicity.
Before giving the new typing rule, we introduce a function which gives the type
binding corresponding to an elementary pattern: b(q, τ ) is such that b(x, τ ) = (x : τ )
and b(* as x, τ ) = (x : [τ ]seq). This function is used in the trans typing rule which
is modified as follows:
Γ ∪ {b(qij , τ )}j≤mi ∪ {self : [τ ]ρ} ⊢ ei : [τ ′ ]seq
i≤n
Γ ⊢ trans [q11 ,...,q1m1 =>e1 ;...;qn1 ,...,qnmn =>en ] : [τ ]ρ → [τ ′ ]ρ
5.2
(trans′ )
Directions in Patterns
In section 4.2 we saw the operator left that returns the left neighbor of an element
in a sequence. In the framework of topological collections, a topology can supply
several neighborhood operators. For example left and right are the neighborhood
operators of the sequence and north and east are neighborhood operators of the
grid. Neighborhood operators are also called directions.
A direction can be used to refine the patterns: the commas of the pattern can
be substituted by a direction to restrict the accepted neighbors for the rest of the
pattern. The substituting direction is surrounded with the symbols | and > to
sketch a kind of arrow.
For example if d is a direction we can use the pattern x |d> y which is a shortcut 3 for x,y/y=(d x self). However, the pattern x |d> y allows faster research
of the instances of the pattern in the collection than x,y/y=(d x self).
The pattern x |d> y can be typed as x,y/y=(d x self).
The Bead-Sort Example
The bead-sort is an original way of sorting positive integers presented by [2]. The
sorting algorithm considers a column of numbers written in unary basis. Figure 4a
shows the numbers 3, 2, 4 and 2 where the beads stand for the digits. The sorting
is done by letting the beads fall down as shown on figure 4b.
The problem can be represented on a grid of booleans where true stands for
a digit and false for the absence of digit as shown on figure 4c. The bead-sort is
achieved by iterating the application of the following transformation until a fixpoint
is reached:
trans [ x/x=false |north> y/y=true => y::x::empty seq ; x=>[x] ]
The first rule of this transformation is expressed as
3 The expression y=(d x self) in a guard where y is a pattern variable and d is a direction tests that the
values denoted are the same and that their positions in the collection are the same. See the MGS manual [6]
for more details.
12
Cohen
(3)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(4)
(a)
(b)
t
t
t
f
f
t
t
t
f
t
t
f
t
f
t
t
t
t
t
f
t
f
t
t
t
t
t
t
(c)
f
f
f
t
(d)
Fig. 4. The Bead-Sort
x/x=false , y/(y=true && y=north x self) => y::x::empty seq
in order to fit the type system. The result of W on this transformation is [bool]grid →
[bool]grid.
5.3
Strategies
As far as the rules application strategy guarantees that every element of the collection is matched (this is always possible since the last rule always matches) the type
system is not affected.
For instance, the MGS language provides several strategies such as higher priority given to the first rules or random application of the rules.
6
Conclusion
Including the topological collections and pattern matching programming on these
structures in the ML framework allows to bring together a powerful programming
language with a rule programming framework common to several other languages.
Our algorithm has been tested on MGS programs and has been included in a
prototype MGS compiler in order to achieve type-oriented optimizations on the produced code. We believe that the best pattern matching algorithms would be wasted
on a dynamically typed language and thus a type inference algorithm is an important step in the development of an efficient compiler for rule based transformations.
However some restrictions on the MGS language had to be done in order to
keep the simplicity of the Damas-Milner algorithm. We are currently working on a
type inference system with union types [1] to account for heterogeneous collections
supplied by the MGS language.
Finally, we said that an error could occur when a transformation tries to replace
a subpart by a part of different shape on topologies as the grid which cannot get
out of shape. Such errors are not type errors but some of them could be detected
statically with a specific type based analysis. Some research such as [11] manage
with this kind of error but the concerned languages do not provide the flexibility of
the rule based transformations proposed here.
A
Free Variables
The free variables of a type are the variables occurring in that type. Lt computes
the free type variables whereas Lr computes the free topology variables.
13
Cohen
Lt (T )
=
∅
Lt (α)
=
{α}
Lt (τ1 → τ2 )
=
Lt (τ1 ) ∪ Lt (τ2 )
Lt (τ1 × τ2 )
=
Lt (τ1 ) ∪ Lt (τ2 )
Lt ([τ ]ρ)
=
Lt (τ )
Lr (T )
=
∅
Lr (α)
=
∅
Lr (τ1 → τ2 )
=
Lr (τ1 ) ∪ Lr (τ2 )
Lr (τ1 × τ2 )
=
Lr (τ1 ) ∪ Lr (τ2 )
Lr ([τ ]θ)
=
{θ} ∪ Lr (τ )
Lr ([τ ]R) = Lr (τ )
The free variables of a type scheme are the non-quantified variables occurring
in it:
Lt (∀[α1 , . . . , αn ], [θ1 , . . . , θm ].τ ) = Lt (τ )\{α1 , . . . , αn }
Lr (∀[α1 , . . . , αn ], [θ1 , . . . , θm ].τ ) = Lr (τ )\{θ1 , . . . , θm }
References
[1] Aiken, A. and E. Wimmers, Type inclusion constraints and type inference, in: Proceedings of the Seventh
ACM Conference on Functional Programming and Computer Architecture, 1993, pp. 31–41.
[2] Arulanandham, J. J., C. S. Calude and M. J. Dinneen, Bead-Sort: A natural sorting algorithm, EATCS
Bull 76 (2002), pp. 153–162.
[3] Buneman, P., S. Naqvi, V. Tannen and L. Wong, Principles of programming with complex objects and
collection types, Theoretical Computer Science 149 (1995), pp. 3–48.
[4] Clement, D., J. Despeyroux, T. Despeyroux and G. Kahn, A simple applicative language: Mini-ML,
in: Proceedings of the ACM conference on LISP and Functional Programming, 1986, pp. 13–27.
[5] Damas, L. and R. Milner, Principal type-schemes for functionnal programs, in: Proceedings of the 15’th
Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (1982), pp. 207–212.
[6] Giavitto, J.-L. and O. Michel, MGS: a programming language for the transformations of topological
collections, Technical Report lami-61-2001, LaMI Université d’Évry Val d’Essonne (2001).
[7] Giavitto, J.-L. and O. Michel, MGS: a rule-based programming language for complex objects and
collections, in: M. van den Brand and R. Verma, editors, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer
Science, 59 (2001).
[8] Giavitto, J.-L. and O. Michel, Data structure as topological spaces, in: Proceedings of the 3nd
International Conference on Unconventional Models of Computation UMC02, 2509, Himeji, Japan,
2002, pp. 137–150, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[9] Giavitto, J.-L. and O. Michel, Pattern-matching and rewriting rules for group indexed data structures,
in: RULE’02 (2002), pp. 55–66.
[10] Hindley, J., The principal type scheme of an object in combinatory logic, Transactions of the American
Mathematical Society 146 (1969), pp. 29–60.
[11] Jay, C. B., A semantics for shape, Science of Computer Programming 25 (1995), pp. 251–283.
[12] Jeuring, J. and P. Jansson, Polytypic programming, in: J. Launchbury, E. Meijer and T. Sheard, editors,
Advanced Functional Programming, Second International School (1996), pp. 68–114, LNCS 1129.
[13] Lisper, B. and P. Hammarlund, On the relation between functional and data-parallel programming
languages, in: Proc. of the 6th. Int. Conf. on Functional Languages and Computer Architectures, ACM,
1993, pp. 210–222.
[14] Milner, R., A theory of type polymorphism in programming, Journal of Computer and System Sciences
17 (1978), pp. 348–375.
[15] Wadler, P., “Efficient compilation of pattern matching,” Prentice-Hall, 1987 Ch. 6 of ”The
Implementation of Functionnal Programming Language”, S. L. Peyton Jones.
14
| 6cs.PL
|
New efficient algorithms for multiple change-point detection with
kernels
A. Célissec,e , G. Marota,c , M. Pierre-Jeana,b , G.J. Rigaillb,d
a Univ. Lille Droit et Santé EA 2694 - CERIM, F-59000 Lille, France
8071 CNRS - Université d’Evry - INRA Laboratoire Statistique et Génome Evry
c Inria Lille Nord Europe Équipe-projet Inria MODAL
d Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay, UMR 9213/UMR1403, CNRS, INRA, Université Paris-Sud,
Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité
e Univ. Lille Sciences et Technologies, CNRS, UMR 8524 - Laboratoire Paul Painlevé, F-59000 Lille, France
arXiv:1710.04556v1 [math.ST] 12 Oct 2017
b UMR
Abstract
Several statistical approaches based on reproducing kernels have been proposed to detect abrupt
changes arising in the full distribution of the observations and not only in the mean or variance.
Some of these approaches enjoy good statistical properties (oracle inequality, . . . ). Nonetheless,
they have a high computational cost both in terms of time and memory. This makes their application difficult even for small and medium sample sizes (n < 104 ). This computational issue is
addressed by first describing a new efficient and exact algorithm for kernel multiple change-point
detection with an improved worst-case complexity that is quadratic in time and linear in space.
It allows dealing with medium size signals (up to n ≈ 105 ). Second, a faster but approximation
algorithm is described. It is based on a low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix. It is linear
in time and space. This approximation algorithm can be applied to large-scale signals (n ≥ 106 ).
These exact and approximation algorithms have been implemented in R and C for various kernels. The computational and statistical performances of these new algorithms have been assessed
through empirical experiments. The runtime of the new algorithms is observed to be faster than
that of other considered procedures.
Finally, simulations confirmed the higher statistical accuracy of kernel-based approaches to
detect changes that are not only in the mean. These simulations also illustrate the flexibility of
kernel-based approaches to analyze complex biological profiles made of DNA copy number and
allele B frequencies.
An R package implementing the approach will be made available on github.
Keywords: Kernel method, Gram matrix, nonparametric change-point detection, model
selection, algorithms, dynamic programming, DNA copy number, allele B fraction
1. Introduction
In this paper we consider the multiple change-point detection problem [13] where the goal is to
recover abrupt changes arising in the distribution of a sequence of n independent random variables
X1 , . . . , Xn observed at respective time t1 < t2 < . . . < tn .
Preprint submitted to Elsevier
October 13, 2017
State-of-the-art. Many parametric models (Normal, Poisson,. . . ) have been proposed [29, 47, 17].
These models allow detecting different types of changes: in the mean, in the variance and in
both the mean and variance (see also [29, 33, 44]). Efficient algorithms and heuristics have been
proposed for these models. Some of them scale in O(n log(n)) or even in O(n). In practice, these
parametric approaches have proven to be successful for various application fields (see for example
[31, 15]). However one of their main drawbacks is their lack of flexibility. For instance, any change
of distributional assumption requires the development of a new dedicated inference scheme.
By contrast, the recently proposed kernel change-point detection approach [28, 3] is more
generic. It has the potential to detect any change arising in the distribution, which is not easily
captured by standard parametric models. More precisely in this approach, the observations are
first mapped into a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) through a kernel function [4]. The
difficult problem of detecting changes in the distribution is then recast as simply detecting changes
in the mean element of observations in the RKHS, which is made possible using the well-known
kernel trick.
One practical limitation of this kernel-based approach is its considerable computational cost
owing to the use of a n × n Gram matrix combined with a dynamic programming algorithm [6].
More precisely [28] described a dynamic programming algorithm to recover the best segmentation
from 1 to Dmax segments. They claim that their algorithm has a O(Dmax n2 ) time complexity.
However, the latter is not described in full details and its straightforward implementation is not
efficient. First, it requires the storage of a n × n cost matrix (personal communication with the
first author of [28] who was kind enough to send us his code). Thus the algorithm has a O(n2 )
space complexity, which is a severe limitation with nowadays sample sizes. For instance analyzing
a signal of length n = 105 requires storing a 105 × 105 matrix of doubles, which takes 80 GB.
Second, computing the cost matrix is not straightforward. In fact simply using formula (8) of [28]
to compute each term of this cost matrix leads to an O(n4 ) time complexity.
Contributions. The present paper contains several contributions to the computational aspects and
the statistical performance of the kernel change-point procedure introduced by [3].
The first one is to describe a new algorithm to simultaneously perform the dynamic programming step of [28] and also compute the required elements of the cost matrix on the fly. On the
one hand, this algorithm has a complexity of order O(Dmax n2 ) in time and O(Dmax n) in space
(including both the dynamic programming and the cost matrix computation). We also emphasize
that this improved space complexity comes without an increased time complexity. This is a great
algorithmic improvement upon the change-point detection approach described by [3] since it allows
the efficient analysis of signals with up to n = 105 data-points in a matter of a few minutes on a
standard laptop.
On the other hand, our approach is generic in the sense that it works for any positive semidefinite
kernels. Importantly one cannot expect to exactly recover the best segmentations from 1 to Dmax
segments in less than O(Dmax n2 ) without additional specific assumptions on the kernel. Indeed,
2
computing the cost of a given segmentation has already a time complexity of order O(n2 ).
It is also noticeable that our algorithm can be applied to other existing strategies such as the
so-called ECP [40]. To be specific, we show that the divisive clustering algorithm it is based on
and that provides an approximate solution with a complexity of order O(n2 ) in time and space
can be replaced by our algorithm that provides the exact solution with the same time complexity
and reduced memory complexity.
Our second contribution is a new algorithm dealing with larger signals (n > 105 ) based on a
low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix. This computational improvement is possible at the
price of an approximation. It returns approximate best segmentations from 1 to Dmax segments
with a complexity of order O(Dmax p2 n) in time and O((Dmax + p)n) in space, where p is the rank
of the approximation.
The last contribution of the paper is the empirical assessment of the statistical performance
of the KCP procedure introduced by [3]. This empirical analysis is carried out in the biological
context of detecting abrupt changes from a two-dimensional signal made of DNA copy numbers
and allele B fractions [35]. The assessment is done by comparing our approach to state-of-the-art
alternatives on resampled real DNA copy number data [45, 40]. This illustrates the versatility of
the kernel-based approach. To be specific this approach allows the detection of changes in the
distribution of such complex signals without explicitly modeling the type of change we are looking
for.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe our kernel-based
framework and detail the connection between detecting abrupt changes in the distribution and
model selection as described in [3]. A slight generalization of the KCP procedure [3] is also derived
in Section 2.5 by introducing a new parameter ` encoding an additional constraint on the minimal
length of any candidate segment. This turns out to be particularly useful in low signal-to-noise
ratio settings. The versatility of this kernel-based framework is emphasized in Section 2.6 where it
is shown how the ECP approach [40] can be rephrased in terms of kernels. Our main algorithmic
improvements are detailed and justified in Section 3. We empirically illustrate the improved runtime of our algorithm and compare it to the ones of ECP and RBS in Section 3.1.3. In Section 3.2
we detail our faster (but approximate) algorithm used to analyze larger profiles (n > 105 ). It is
based on the combination of a low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix and the binary segmentation heuristic [53]. An empirical comparison of the runtimes of the exact and approximate
algorithms is provided in Section 3.2.3. Finally, Section 4 illustrates the statistical performance
of our kernel-based change-point procedure in comparison with state-of-the-art alternatives in the
context of biological signals such as DNA copy numbers and allele B fractions [35].
2. Kernel framework
In this section we recall the framework of [28] where detecting changes in the distribution of a
complex signal is rephrased as detecting changes of the mean element of a sequence of points in a
3
Hilbert space. Then we detail the so-called KCP (Kernel Change-point Procedure) [3], which has
been proved to be optimal in terms of an oracle inequality.
2.1. Notation
Let X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn ∈ X be a time-series of n independent random variables, where X denotes
any set assumed to be separable [19] throughout the paper. Let k : X ×X → R denote a symmetric
positive semi-definite kernel [4], and H be the associated reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS).
We refer to [11] for an extensive presentation about kernels and RKHS. Let us also introduce the
canonical feature map Φ : X → H defined by Φ(x) = k(x, ·) ∈ H, for every x ∈ X . This canonical
feature map allows to define the inner product on H from the kernel k, by
∀x, y ∈ X ,
hΦ(x), Φ(y)iH = k(x, y).
(1)
The asset of kernels. One main advantage of kernels is to enable dealing with complex data of any
type provided a kernel can be defined. In particular no vector space structure is required on X .
For instance X can be a set of DNA sequences, a set of graphs or a set of distributions to name
but a few examples (see [24] for various instances of X and related kernels). Therefore, as long as
a kernel k can be defined on X , any element x ∈ X is mapped, through the canonical feature map
Φ, to an element of the Hilbert space H. This provides a unified way to deal with different types
of (simple or complex) data. Then for every index 1 ≤ t ≤ n, let us note
Yt = Φ(Xt ) ∈ H.
(2)
From now on, we will only consider the following sequence Y1 , . . . , Yn ∈ H of independent Hilbertvalued random vectors.
The kernel trick. As a space of functions from X to R, the RKHS H can be infinite dimensional.
From a computational perspective one could be worried that manipulating such objects is computationally prohibitive. However this is not the case and our algorithm relies on the so-called
kernel trick, which consists in translating any inner product in H in terms of the kernel k by use
of Eq. (1). For every 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n, it results
hYi , Yj iH = k(Xi , Xj ) = Ki,j ,
where Ki,j denotes the (i, j)-th coefficient of the n × n Gram matrix K = [ k(Xi , Xj ) ]1≤i,j≤n .
2.2. Detecting changes in the distribution using kernels
Let us consider the model introduced by [3], which connects every Yt to its “mean” µ?t ∈ H by
∀ 1 ≤ t ≤ n,
Yt = Φ(Xt ) = µ?t + t ∈ H,
(3)
where µ?t denotes the mean element associated with the distribution PXt of Xt , and t = Yt − µ?t .
Let us also recall [38] that if X is separable and E [ k(Xt , Xt ) ] < +∞, then µ?t exists and is defined
as the unique element in H such that
∀ f ∈ H,
hµ?t , f iH = E hΦ(Xt ), f iH .
4
(4)
For characteristic kernels [50], a change in the distribution of Xt implies a change in the mean
element µ?t , that is
∀ 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n,
PXi 6= PXj ⇒ µ?i 6= µ?j ,
(5)
the converse implication being true by definition of µ?t in Eq. (4). The idea behind kernel changepoint detection [3] is to translate the problem of detecting changes in the distribution into detecting
changes in the mean of Hilbert-valued vectors.
Remark 1. When considering X ⊂ Rq for some integer q > 0, several classical kernels are
characteristic. For instance,
• The Gaussian kernel: k(x, y) = e−kx−yk
2
/δ
, with x, y ∈ Rq and δ > 0,
• The Laplace kernel: k(x, y) = e−kx−yk/δ , with x, y ∈ Rq and δ > 0,
• The exponential kernel: k(x, y) = e−hx,yiq /δ , with x, y ∈ Rq and δ > 0,
where k·k and h·, ·iq respectively denote the usual Euclidean norm and inner product in Rq . The
energy-based kernel discussed in Section 2.6 is also a characteristic kernel (see Lemma 1 in [41]).
However, with more general sets X , building a characteristic kernel is challenging as illustrated by
[50] and [14].
Let us also notice that the procedure developed by [3] can be seen as a “kernelized version” of
the procedure proposed by [37], which was originally designed to detect changes in the mean of
real-valued variables.
2.3. Statistical framework
From Eq. (5) it results that any sequence of abrupt changes in the distribution along the
∗
time corresponds to a sequence of D∗ true change-points 1 = τ1∗ < τ2∗ < . . . < τD
∗ ≤ n (with
∗
τD
∗ +1 = n + 1 by convention) such that
µ∗1 = . . . = µ∗τ1∗ −1 6= µ∗τ1∗ = . . . = µ∗τ2∗ −1 6= . . . 6= µ∗τ ∗ ∗ = . . . = µ∗n .
D
∗
In other words we get that µ =
(µ∗1 , . . . , µ∗n )0
n
∈ H is piecewise constant.
From a set of D candidate change-points 1 = τ1 < . . . < τD ≤ n, let τ be defined by
τ = (τ1 , τ2 , . . . , τD−1 , τD ) ,
with the convention τ1 = 1 and τD+1 = n + 1. With a slight abuse of notation, we also call τ
the segmentation of {1, . . . , n} associated with the change-points 1 = τ1 < . . . < τD ≤ n. The
0
0
estimator µ̂τ = (µ̂τ1 , . . . , µ̂τn ) ∈ Hn of µ∗ = (µ∗1 , . . . , µ∗n ) proposed by [3] is defined by
∀ 1 ≤ i ≤ D,
∀ t ∈ {τi , . . . , τi+1 − 1} ,
µ̂τt =
τi+1 −1
X
1
Yt0 .
τi+1 − τi 0
t =τi
τ
The performance of µ̂ is measured by the quadratic risk:
" n
#
h
i
X
τ
∗
τ 2
∗
τ 2
R(µ̂ ) = E kµ − µ̂ kH,n = E
kµi − µ̂i kH ,
i=1
where k·kH denotes the norm in the Hilbert space H.
5
2.4. Model selection
If the signal-to-noise ratio is small, [3] emphasized that all true change-points cannot be recovered without including false change-points. This leads them to define the best segmentation τ ∗
(for a finite sample size) as
τ ∗ = arg min kµ∗ − µ̂τ kH,n ,
τ ∈Tn
where Tn denotes the collection of all possible segmentations τ of {1, . . . , n} with at most Dmax
segments. When the signal-to-noise ratio is large enough, τ ∗ coincides with the true segmentation.
As a surrogate to the previous unknown criterion, [3] optimize the following penalized criterion
n
o
n−1
τ 2
τ̂ = arg min kY − µ̂ kH,n + pen(τ ) ,
with pen(τ ) = c1 Dτ + c2 log
,
(6)
D−1
τ ∈Tn
where Y = (Y1 , . . . , Yn )> ∈ Rn , c1 , c2 > 0 are constants to be fixed, and Dτ denotes the number of
segments of the segmentation τ . Since this penalty only depends on τ through Dτ , optimizing (6)
can be formulated as a two-step procedure. The first step consists in solving:
∀ 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax ,
2
τ̂D = arg min kY − µ̂τ kH,n ,
(7)
τ ∈TD
where TD denotes the set of segmentations with D segments. This optimization problem, which is
usually solved by dynamic programming [6, 47], is computationally hard since the cardinality of
n−1
TD is D−1
. The second step is to straightforwardly optimize:
D̂ = arg min
1≤D≤Dmax
n
o
2
kY − µ̂τ̂D kH,n + pen(τ̂D )
and τ̂ = τ̂D̂ .
(8)
The right-most term in the penalty (6) accounts for the number of candidate segmentations
with D segments (see the comments of Theorem 2 in [3]). Intuitively this term balances the trend
of the estimator (7) to overfit because of the large number of candidate segmentations.
Remark 2. It is important to notice that the above two-step procedure depends on the hyperparameter Dmax , which is the maximum number of segments of the candidate segmentations.
In fact choosing an appropriate Dmax is related to the calibration of constants c1 and c2 in the
penalty term of (6). Since the optimal values of c1 and c2 depend (at least) on the variance of the
signal at hand, they have to be calibrated in a data-driven way. Here they have been calibrated by
using the so-called slope heuristic technique described in [3] (see also the numerical experiments in
Section 4 for more details). In particular Dmax has to be chosen large enough to make the slope
heuristic work well. Given some prior knowledge of an adequate range of values for D taking Dmax
to be 10 to 20 times larger than that seems to work well in practice. Typically for copy number
data (see Section 4.1.1) one rarely expect more than 10 change-points per chromosome and taking
Dmax ≈ 100 or 200 often make sense.
From a theoretical point of view, this model selection procedure has been proved to be optimal
in terms of an oracle inequality by [3]. This is the usual non-asymptotic optimality result for model
6
selection procedures [12]. This procedure has also been proved to provide consistent estimates of
the change-points [23]. However, from a computational point of view, the first step (i.e. solving
Eq. (7)) remains challenging. Indeed existing dynamic programming algorithms are time and
space consuming when used in the kernel framework as it will be clarified in Section 3.1.1. The
main purpose of the present paper is to provide a new computationally efficient algorithm to solve
Eq. (7). Our new algorithm has a reduced space and time complexity and allows the analysis of
signals larger than n = 104 .
2.5. Low signal-to-noise and minimal length of a segment
In settings where the signal-to-noise ratio is weak (see for instance Figure 4 where the tumor
percentage is low) change-point detection procedures are more likely to put changes in noisy regions.
This results in overfitting and meaningless small segments [1]. A common solution is to include a
constraint on the minimum length ` of segments. For instance by default ECP enforces that the
estimated segmentation has segments with at least ` = 30 points [32].
One important side effect of this constraint on ` is that the total number of candidate segmentations with D segments quickly decreases with `. Therefore the penalty in (6) has to be
modified.
The following lemma gives the cardinality of this set of segmentations.
Lemme 1. Let Tn` (D) denote the set of segmentations of (1, . . . , n) in exactly D ≥ 1 segments
such that the length of each segment is at least ` ≥ 1. Then the cardinality of Tn` (D) satisfies
n − D(` − 1) − 1
Card Tn` (D) =
.
D−1
Let us notice that if ` = 1, one recovers the usual cardinality that is used in the penalty (see
Eq. (6)). As an illustration of the influence of the constraint on `, let us consider the set-up where
n = 100, D = 10, and ` = 10. Then the size of the unconstrained set of segmentations with 10
1
10
segments T100 (10) = T100
(10) is Card (T100 (10)) ≈ 1.7 · 1012 , whereas the constrained set T100
(10)
is smaller since its cardinality is equal to 1.
Proof of Lemma 1. The proof consists in showing that there is a one-to-one mapping between the
set Tn` (D) of segmentations of (1, . . . , n) with D segments of length at least ` ≥ 1, and the set
Sn` (D) of segmentations of (1, . . . , n − D(` − 1)) with D (non-empty) segments.
Let us consider one segmentation τ ∈ Tn` (D). Since each segment of τ is of length at least
`, let us remove ` − 1 points from the left edge of each of the D segments. Then the resulting
segmentation belongs to Sn` (D).
Conversely, take one segmentation τ ∈ Sn` (D). Then each segment of τ contains at least one
point. Adding ` − 1 points to each segment (from the left edge) clearly provides a segmentation
with D segments of length at least `. This allows to conclude.
This leads to the following generalized change-points detection procedure involving a constraint
on the minimum length ` ≥ 1 of each segment.
7
Step 1: Solve
2
`
τ̂D
= arg min kY − µ̂τ kH,n ,
∀ 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax ,
(9)
τ ∈Tn` (D)
where Tn` (D) denotes the set of segmentations with D segments of length at least ` ≥ 1.
Step 2: Find
`
D̂ = arg min
`
τ̂D
Y − µ̂
D
where pen` (τ ) = c1 Dτ + c2 log
2
H,n
n−Dτ (`−1)−1
Dτ −1
+
`
pen` (τ̂D
)
`
and τ̂ ` = τ̂D̂
`,
(10)
.
Let us emphasize that this generalized procedure, including this additional parameter ` ≥ 1,
is very similar the previous one. The optimization step of Eq. (9) is performed by dynamic
programming up to a minor change of implementation. The optimization of the second step (10)
remains unchanged except it involves a slightly different penalty shape. The tuning of the constant
c1 and c2 is still made by the slope heuristic (see Section 4).
2.6. A link between kernels and energy-based distances
Note that the kernel-based framework developed in Sections 2.1–2.3 is very general. Various
existing procedures can be rephrased in this framework by use of a particular kernel. For example
the procedure of [37], which is devoted to the detection of changes in the mean of a one-dimensional
real-valued signal, reduces to ours by use of the linear kernel. More interestingly the procedure
called ECP developed by [40] and that relies on an energy-based distance to detect changes in
multivariate distributions, can also be integrated into our framework using a particular kernel as
explained in what follows.
α
For every α ∈ (0, 2), let us define ρα (x, y) = kx − yk , where x, y ∈ Rq and k·k denotes the
Euclidean norm on Rq . Then ρα is a semimetric of negative type [10], and for any independent
random variables X, X 0 , Y, Y 0 ∈ Rd with respective probability distributions satisfying PX = PX 0
and PY = PY 0 , [40] introduce the energy-based distance:
E(X, Y ; α) = 2E [ ρα (X, Y ) ] − E [ ρα (X, X 0 ) ] − E [ ρα (Y, Y 0 ) ] ,
(11)
with the assumption that max (E [ ρα (X, X 0 ) ] , E [ ρα (X, Y ) ] , E [ ρα (Y, Y 0 ) ]) < +∞. Then following [48] and for every x0 ∈ Rd , we define
kαx0 (x, y) =
1
[ ρα (x, x0 ) + ρα (y, x0 ) − ρα (x, y) ] ,
2
(12)
0
which is a positive semi-definite kernel leading to an RKHS Hα
. Plugging this in Eq. (11), one
8
can easily check that
E(X, Y ; α) = 2E [ ρα (X, x0 ) + ρα (Y, x0 ) − 2kαx0 (X, Y ) ]
− E [ ρα (X, x0 ) + ρα (X 0 , x0 ) − 2kαx0 (X, X 0 ) ]
− E [ ρα (Y, x0 ) + ρα (Y 0 , x0 ) − 2kαx0 (Y, Y 0 ) ]
= 2E [ kαx0 (X, X 0 ) + kαx0 (Y, Y 0 ) − 2kαx0 (X, Y ) ]
α
= 2 µα
PX − µPY
2
H0α
,
α
0
where µα
PX , µPY ∈ Hα respectively denote the mean elements of the distributions PX and PY , and
0
k·kH0α is the norm in Hα
.
An important consequence of this derivation is that the exact and approximation algorithms
described in Section 3 immediately apply to procedures relying on the optimization of the energybased distance E(X, Y ; α). This is all the more noticeable as our exact algorithm has a lower
memory complexity than the approximate optimization algorithm of ECP (with a similar time
complexity). Therefore, for the same computational time, our exact optimization algorithm could
replace the approximate algorithm used in ECP. One can also emphasize that our approximate
algorithm which is even faster could also be used (see its description in Section 3.2). This particular energy-based kernel, which is a characteristic kernel, has been involved in our simulation
experiments as well (Section 4.2.1).
3. New algorithms
In this section we first show how to avoid the preliminary calculation of the cost matrix required
by [28] to apply dynamic programming. The key idea is to compute the elements of the cost matrix
on the fly when they are required by the dynamic programming algorithm. Roughly, this can be
efficiently done by reordering the loops involved in Algorithm 1 proposed in [28]. This leads to the
new exact Algorithm 3. It has a reduced space complexity of order O(n) compared to O(n2 ) for
the one used in [28]. Note that including the constraint (introduced in Section 2.5) on the segment
sizes mostly change the index of the for loops in Algorithm 3. We choose to describe the algorithm
in the unconstrained version (7) to ease the understanding.
Second, we provide a faster but approximation algorithm (Section 3.2), which enjoys a smaller
complexity of order O(Dmax n) in time. It combines a low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix
and the use of the binary segmentation heuristic (Section 3.2.2). This approximation algorithm
allows the analysis of very large signals (n ≥ 106 ).
3.1. New efficient algorithm to recover the best segmentation from the Gram matrix
As exposed in Section 2.4, the main computational cost of the change-point detection procedure
results from Eq. (7), that is recovering the best segmentation with 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax segments and
9
solving
2
LD,n+1 = min kY − µ̂τ kH,n
(best fit to the data)
τ ∈TD
2
m̂D = arg min kY − µ̂τ kH,n
(best segmentation)
(13)
τ ∈TD
for every 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax , where TD denotes the collection of segmentations of {1, . . . , n} with D
segments. This challenging step involves the use of dynamic programming [9, 7], which provides
the exact solution to the optimization problem (13). Let us first provide some details on the usual
way dynamic programming is implemented.
3.1.1. Limitations of the standard dynamic programming algorithm for kernels
Let τ denote a segmentation in D segments (with the convention that τ1 = 1 and τD+1 = n+1).
For any 1 ≤ d ≤ D, the segment {τd , . . . , τd+1 − 1} of the segmentation τ has a cost that is equal
to
τd+1 −1
Cτd ,τd+1 =
X
k(Xi , Xi ) −
i=τd
τd+1 −1
X
1
τd+1 − τd i=τ
d
τd+1 −1
X
k(Xi , Xj ).
(14)
j=τd
Then the cost of the segmentation τ is given by
kY − µ̂τ k2H,n =
D
X
Cτd ,τd+1 ,
d=1
which is clearly segment additive [28, 3].
Dynamic programming solves (13) for all 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax by applying the following update rules
∀ 2 ≤ D ≤ Dmax ,
LD,n+1 = min{ LD−1,τ + Cτ,n+1 },
τ ≤n
(15)
which exploits the property that the optimal segmentation in D segments over {1, . . . , n} can
be computed from optimal ones with D − 1 segments over {1, . . . , τ } (τ ≤ n). Making the key
assumption that the cost matrix {Ci,j }1≤i,j≤n+1 has been stored, we can compute LD,n+1 with
Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 1 Basic use of Dynamic Programming
1: for D = 2 to Dmax do
2:
3:
4:
5:
for τ 0 = D to n do
LD,τ 0 +1 = minτ ≤τ 0 { LD−1,τ + Cτ,τ 0 +1 }
end for
end for
This algorithm is used by [28] and suffers two main limitations. First it assumes that the
Cτ,τ 0 have been already computed, and does not take into account the computational cost of its
calculation. Second, it stores all Cτ,τ 0 in a O(n2 ) matrix, which is memory expensive.
A quick inspection of the algorithm reveals that the main step at Line 3 requires O(τ 0 ) operations (assuming the Ci,j s have been already computed). Therefore, with the two for loops we get
10
a complexity of O(Dmax n2 ) in time. Note that without any particular assumption on the kernel
2
k(·, ·), computing kY − µ̂τ kH,n for a given segmentation τ is already of order O(n2 ) in time since it
involves summing over a quadratic number of terms of the Gram matrix (see Eq. (14)). Therefore,
there is no hope to solve (13) exactly in less than quadratic time without additional assumptions
on the kernel.
From Eq. (14) let us also remark that computing each Ci,j (1 ≤ i < j ≤ n) naively requires itself
a quadratic number of operations. Computing the whole cost matrix would require a complexity
O(n4 ) in time. Taking this into account, the dynamic programming step (Line 3 of Algorithm 1)
is not the limiting factor and the overall time complexity of Agorithm 1 is O(n4 ).
Finally, let us emphasize that this high computational burden is not specific of detecting changepoints with kernels. It is rather representative of most learning procedures based on reproducing
kernels and the associated Gram matrix [8].
3.1.2. Improved use of dynamic programming for kernel methods
Reducing space complexity. From Algorithm 1, let us first remark that each Cτ,τ 0 is used several
times along the algorithm. A simple idea to avoid that is to swap the two for loops in Algorithm 1.
This leads to the following modified Algorithm 2, where each column C·,τ 0 +1 of the cost matrix is
only used once unlike in Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 2 Improved space complexity
1: for τ 0 = 2 to n do
2:
3:
4:
5:
for D = 2 to min(τ 0 , Dmax ) do
LD,τ 0 +1 = minτ ≤τ 0 { LD−1,τ + Cτ,τ 0 +1 }
end for
end for
Importantly swapping the two for loop does not change the output of the algorithm and does
not induce any additional calculations. Furthermore, at step τ 0 of the first for loop we do not need
the whole n × n cost matrix to be stored, but only the column C·,τ 0 +1 of the cost matrix. This
column is of size at most O(n).
Algorithm 2 finally requires storing coefficients {Ld,τ }1≤d≤D,
2≤τ ≤n
that are computed along
the algorithm as well as successive column vectors {C·,τ }2≤τ ≤n (of size at most n) of the cost
matrix. This leads to an overall complexity of O(Dmax n) in space. The only remaining problem is
to compute these successive column vectors efficiently. Let us recall that a naive implementation
is prohibitive: each coefficient of the column vector can be computed in O(n2 ), which would lead
to O(n3 ) to get the entire column.
Iterative computation of the columns of the cost matrix. The last ingredient of our final exact
algorithm is the efficient computation of each column vector {C·,τ }2≤τ ≤n . Let us explain how to
iteratively compute each vector in linear time.
11
First it can be easily observed that Eq. (14) can be rephrased as follows
Cτ,τ 0 =
0
τX
−1
i=τ
where Dτ,τ 0 =
Pτ 0 −1
i=τ
0
Ai,τ 0
k (Xi , Xi ) − 0
τ −τ
= Dτ,τ 0
τ −1
1 X
− 0
Ai,τ 0 ,
τ − τ i=τ
k (Xi , Xi ) and
Ai,τ 0 = −k(Xi , Xi ) + 2
0
τX
−1
k(Xi , Xj ).
j=i
Second, both Dτ,τ 0 and {Ai,τ 0 }i≤τ 0 can be iteratively computed from τ 0 to τ 0 + 1 by use of the two
following equations:
Dτ,τ 0 +1 = Dτ,τ 0 + k(Xτ 0 , Xτ 0 ),
Ai,τ 0 +1 = Ai,τ 0 + 2k(Xτ 0 , Xτ 0 ), ∀i ≤ τ 0 ,
and
with Aτ 0 +1,τ 0 +1 = −k(Xτ 0 +1 , Xτ 0 +1 ). Therefore, as long as computing k(xi , xj ) requires O(1)
operations, updating from τ 0 to τ 0 + 1 requires O (τ 0 ) operations.
Remark 3. Note that for many classical kernels, computing k(xi , xj ) is indeed O(1) in time. If
xi ∈ Rq with q a positive integer being negligible with respect to other influential quantities such as
Dmax and n, several kernels such as the Gaussian, Laplace, or χ2 ones lead to a O(q) = O(1) time
complexity for evaluating k(xi , xj ). By contrast in case where q is no longer negligible, the resulting
time complexity is multiplied by a factor q, which corroborates the intuition that the computational
complexity increases with the “complexity” of the objects in X .
This update rule leads us to the following Algorithm 3, where each column C·,τ 0 +1 in the first
for loop is computed only once:
Algorithm 3 Improved space and time complexity (Kernseg)
1: for τ 0 = 2 to n do
2:
Compute the (τ 0 + 1)-th column C·,τ 0 +1 from C·,τ 0
3:
for D = 2 to min(τ 0 , Dmax ) do
LD,τ 0 +1 = minτ ≤τ 0 {LD−1,τ + Cτ,τ 0 +1 }
4:
end for
5:
6:
end for
From a computational point of view, each step of the first for loop in Algorithm 3 requires
O(τ 0 ) operations to compute C·,τ 0 +1 and at most O(Dmax τ 0 ) additional operations to perform the
dynamic programming step at Line 4. Then the overall complexity is O(Dmax n2 ) in time and
O(Dmax n) in space. This should be compared to the O(Dmax n4 ) time complexity of the naive
calculation of the cost matrix and to the O(n2 ) space complexity of the standard Algorithm 1 from
[28].
12
3.1.3. Runtimes comparison to other implementations
The purpose of the present section is to perform the comparison between Algorithm 3 and other
competitors to illustrate their performances as the sample size increases with Dmax = 100.
The first comparison has been carried out between Algorithm 3 and the naive quartic computation of the cost matrix (Algorithm 1). These two algorithms have been implemented in C
and packaged in R. Results for these algorithms are reported in Figure 1 (Left). Unsurprisingly,
our quadratic algorithm (called Kernseg) is faster than a quartic computation of the cost matrix
(called KCP) even for very small sample sizes (n < 320).
Second, we also compared the runtime of Kernseg (Algorithm 3) with that of ECP discussed
in Section 2.6 implemented in the R-package [32] (see the middle panel of Figure 1). Since ECP
is based on the binary segmentation heuristic applied to an energy-based distance, its worst-case
complexity is at most O(Dmax n2 ) in time, which is the same as that of Kernseg. Note also that the
native implementation of ECP involves an additional procedure relying on permutations to choose
the number of change-points. If B denotes the number of permutations, the induced complexity
is then O(BDmax n2 ) in time. To be fair, we compared our approach and ECP with and without
the permutation layer. Finally it is also necessary to emphasize that unlike Kernseg, ECP does
not provide the exact but only an approximate solution to the optimization problem (13). Results
are summarized in Figure 1 (Middle). It illustrates that our exact algorithm (Kernseg) has a
quadratic complexity similar to that of ECP with and without permutations. Our algorithm is
the overall fastest one even for small sample size (n < 1 000). Although this probably results from
implementation differences, it is still noteworthy since Kernseg is exact unlike ECP.
Finally, Figure 1 (Right) illustrates the worse memory use of ECP (with and without any
permutations) as compared to that of the exact KS.Gau (Kernseg used with the Gaussian kernel).
ECP has an O(n2 ) space complexity, while KS.Gau is O(n). For n larger than 104 the quadratic
space complexity of ECP is a clear limitation since several Gb of RAM are required.
3.2. Approximating the Gram matrix to speed up the algorithm
In Section 3.1.2, we described an improved algorithm called Kernseg, which carefully combines
dynamic programming with the computation of the cost matrix elements. This new algorithm
(Algorithm 3) provides the exact solution to the optimization problem given by Eq. (13). However
without any further assumption on the underlying reproducing kernel, this algorithm only achieves
the complexity O(n2 ) in time, which is a clear limitation with large scale signals (n ≥ 105 ). Note
also that this limitation results from the use of general positive semi-definite kernels (and related
Gram matrices) and cannot be improved by existing algorithms to the best of our knowledge. For
instance, the binary segmentation heuristic [22], which is known to be computationally efficient for
parametric models, suffers the same O(n2 ) time complexity when used in the reproducing kernel
framework (see Section 3.2.2).
Let us remark however that for some particular kernels it is possible to reduce this time complexity. For example for the linear one k(x, y) = hx, yiRd , x, y ∈ Rd , one can use the following
13
1
2
ECP
ECPnoPerm
KS.Gau
2
400
6
3
1
2
2
1
40
2
200
4
time in seconds
80
60
2
Memory in Mo
2
300
100
8
120
10
ECP
ECPnoPerm
KS.Gau
3
1
2
2
2
2
20
3
1
2
2
150
1
200
250
1
1
1
300
350
2
3
11
22
21
21
1
21
0
1000
2
2
1
2
1
3
32
2
31
2
31
2
31
2
1
3
1
21
0
1
0
2
1
2
1
100
2
0
time in seconds
KernSeg and ECP (Memory)
600
KernSeg and ECP (Time)
2
500
KernSeg and KCP
KS.Gau
quarticKCP
2000
3000
n
4000
5000
6000
7000
0
1000
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
n
n
Figure 1: (Left) Runtime in seconds of Algorithm 3 as a function of the length of the signal (n) for Dmax = 100.
(1-red) and a quartic computation of the cost matrix (2-violet). (Middle) Runtime in seconds of Algorithm 3 as
a function of the length of the signal (1-red) and of ECP without permutation (2-blue) and ECP with the default
number of permutations (3-green). (Right) Memory in mega-octet of Algorithm 3 as a function of the length of
the signal (1-red) and of ECP without permutation (2-blue) and ECP with the default number of permutations
(3-green). The performances of ECP with or without permutation are exactly the same.
trick
*
X
1≤i6=j≤n
k(Xi , Xj ) =
X
1≤i≤n
Xi ,
n
X
+
Xj − Xi
j=1
=
n
X
2
Xi
−
i=1
n
X
2
kXi k ,
(16)
i=1
where k·k denotes the Euclidean norm in Rd .
The purpose of the present section is to describe a versatile strategy (i.e applicable to any kernel)
relying on a low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix [52, 49, 21]. This approximation allows
to considerably reduce the computation time by exploiting (16). Note however that the resulting
procedure achieves this lower time complexity at the price of only providing an approximation to
the exact solution to (13) (unlike the algorithm described in Section 3.1.2).
3.2.1. Low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix
The main idea is to follow the same strategy as the one described by [20] to derive a low-rank
approximation to the Gram matrix K = {Ki,j }1≤i,j≤n , where Ki,j = k(Xi , Xj ).
Assuming K has rank rk(K) n, we could be tempted to compute the best rank approximation
to K by computing the rk(K) largest eigenvalues (and corresponding eigenvectors) of K. However
such computations induce a O(n3 ) time complexity which is prohibitive.
Instead, [20] suggest applying this idea on a square sub-matrix of K with size p n. For any
subsets I, J ⊂ {1, . . . , n}, let KI,J denote the sub-Gram matrix with respectively row and column
indices in I and J. Let Jp ⊂ {1, . . . , n} denote such a subset with cardinality p, and consider
the sub-Gram matrix KJp ,Jp which is of rank r ≤ p. Further assuming r = p, the best rank p
approximation to KJp ,Jp is KJp ,Jp itself. This leads to the final approximation to the Gram Matrix
14
K [20, 8] by
e = KI ,J K+
K
n p
Jp ,Jp KJp ,In ,
where In = {1, . . . , n}, and K+
Jp ,Jp denotes the pseudo-inverse of KJp ,Jp . Further considering the
SVD decomposition of KJp ,Jp = U0 ΛU, for an orthonormal matrix U, we can rewrite
e = Z0 Z,
K
with
Z = Λ−1/2 U KJp ,In ∈ Mp,n (R).
Note that the resulting time complexity is O(p2 n), which is smaller than the former O(n3 ) as long
√
as p = o( n). This way, columns {Zi }1≤i≤n of Z act as new p-dimensional observations, and each
e i,j can be seen as the inner product between two vectors of Rp , that is
K
e i,j = Z 0 Zj .
K
i
(17)
The main interest of this approximation is that, using Eq. (16), computing the cost of a segment
of length t has a complexity O(t) in time unlike the usual O(t2 ) that holds with general kernels.
Interestingly such an approximation to the Gram matrix can be also built from a set of deterministic points in X . This remark has been exploited to compute our low-rank approximation for
instance in the simulation experiments as explained in Section 4.4.5.
e is of great
Note that choosing the set Jp of columns/rows leading to the approximation K
interest in itself for at least two reasons. First from a computational point of view, the p columns
have to be selected following a process that does not require to compute the n possible columns
e to
beforehand (which would induce an O(n2 ) time complexity otherwise). Second, the quality of K
e that has to be as close as possible to that of K,
approximate K crucially depends on the rank of K
which remains unknown for computational reasons. However such questions are out of scope of the
present paper, and we refer interested readers to [52, 20, 8] where this point has been extensively
discussed.
3.2.2. Binary segmentation heuristic
Since the low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix detailed in Section 3.2.1 leads to finite dimensional vectors in Rp (17), the change-point detection problem described in Section 2.3
amounts to recover abrupt changes of the mean of a p-dimensional time-series. Therefore any existing algorithm usually used to solve this problem in the p-dimensional framework can be applied.
An exhaustive review of such algorithms is out of the scope of the present paper. However we
will mention only a few of them to highlight their drawbacks and motivate our choice. Let us also
recall that our purpose is to provide an efficient algorithm allowing: (i) to (approximately) solve
Eq. (13) for each 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax and (ii) to deal with large sample sizes (n ≥ 106 ).
The first algorithm is the usual version of constrained dynamic programming [7]. Although
it has been recently revisited with p = 1 by [46, 16, 39], it has a O(n2 ) time complexity with
p > 1 , which excludes dealing with large sample sizes. Another version of regularized dynamic
15
programming has been explored by [34] who designed the PELT procedure. It provides the best
segmentation over all segmentations with a penalty of λ per change-point with an O(n) complexity
in time if the number of change-points is linear in n. Importantly, the complexity of the pruning
inside PELT depends on the true number of change-points. For only a few change-points, the
PELT complexity remains quadratic in time. With PELT, it is not straightforward to efficiently
solve Eq. (13) for each 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax , which is precisely the goal we pursue. Note however that
it would still be possible to recover some of those segmentations by exploring a range of λ values
like in CROPS [30].
A second possible algorithm is the so-called binary segmentation [43, 53, 22] that is a standard
heuristic for approximately solving Eq. (13) for each 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax . This iterative algorithm
computes the new segmentation τe (D + 1) with D +1 segments from τe (D) by splitting one segment
of τe (D) into two new ones without modifying other segments. More precisely considering the set
of change-points τe (D) = {τ1 , . . . , τD+1 }, binary segmentation provides
τe (D + 1) =
arg min
τ ∈TD+1 |τ ∩e
τ (D)=e
τ (D)
kY − µ̂τ k2H,n .
Since only one segment of the previous segmentation is divided into two new segments at each step,
the binary segmentation algorithm provides a simple (but only approximate) solution to Eq. (13)
for each 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax .
We provide some pseudo-code for binary segmentation in Algorithm 5. It uses a sub-routine
described by Algorithm 4 to compute the best split of any segment [τ, τ 0 [ of the data. To be specific,
this BestSplit routine outputs four things: (1) the reduction in cost of spliting the segment [τ, τ 0 [,
(2) the best change to split (3) the resulting left segment and (4) the resulting right segment.
In the binary segmentation algorithm candidate splits are stored and handled using a binary
heap data structure [18] using the reduction in cost as a key. This data structure allows to efficiently
insert new splits and extract the best split in O(log(Dmax )) at every time step. Without such a
structure inserting splits and extracting the best split would typically be in O(Dmax ) and for large
Dmax the binary segmentation heuristic is at best O(n2 ). Note that the RBS procedure [45], which
is involved in our simulation experiments (Section 4.2.3), also uses this heuristic.
Algorithm 4 BestSplit of segment [τ, τ 0 [
1:
m̂ = min 0 {Cτ,t + Ct,τ 0 } and t̂ = arg min{Cτ,t + Ct,τ 0 }
2:
Output four things (1) Cτ,t − m̂, (2) t̂ , (3) [τ, t̂[ and (4) [t̂, τ 0 [
τ <t<τ
τ <t<τ 0
16
Algorithm 5 Binary Segmentation
1: Segs = {[1, n + 1[}
2:
Changes = ∅
3:
CandidateSplit = ∅ [a binary heap]
4:
for Dmax iteration do
5:
for aseg ∈ Segs do
6:
Insert BestSplit(aseg) in CandidateSplit
7:
end for
8:
Extract the best split of CandidateSplit and recover: t̂, [τ, t̂[ and = [t̂, τ 0 [
9:
Add t̂ in Changes
10:
11:
Set Segs to { [τ, t̂[, [t̂, τ 0 [ }
end for
Assuming the best split of any segment is linear in its length the overall time complexity of
binary segmentation for recovering approximate solutions to (13) for all 1 ≤ D ≤ Dmax is around
O (log(Dmax )n) in practice. The worst case time complexity is O (Dmax n). A typical setting where
it is achieved is with the linear kernel when i 7→ Xi = exp(i) for instance. At the i-th iteration of
the binary segmentation algorithm, the best split of a segment of length n − i + 1 corresponds to
one segment of length 1 and another one of length n − i.
An important remark is that binary segmentation only achieves this reduced O (log(Dmax )n)
time complexity provided that recovering the best split of any segment is linear in its length. This
is precisely what has been allowed by the low-rank matrix approximation summarized by Eq. (17).
Indeed with the low-rank approximation, computing the best split of any segment is linear in n and
p. The resulting time complexity of binary segmentation is thus O (p log(Dmax )n), which reduces
to O (log(Dmax )n) as long as p is small compared to n. By contrast without the approximation
recovering the best split is typically quadratic in the length of the segment and binary segmentation
would suffer an overall time complexity of order O(log(Dmax )n2 ) or O(Dmax n2 ).
3.2.3. Implementation and runtimes of the approximate solution
The approximation algorithm we recommend is the combination of the low-rank approximation
step detailed in Section 3.2.1 and of the binary segmentation discussed in Section 3.2.2. The
resulting time complexity is then O(p2 n + p log(Dmax )n), which allows dealing with large sample
sizes (n ≥ 106 ).
From this time complexity it arises that an influential parameter is the number p of columns of
the matrix used to build the low-rank approximation. In particular this low-rank approximation
√
remains computationally attractive as long as p = o( n). Figure 2 illustrates the actual time
complexity of this fast algorithm (implemented in C) with respect to n for various values of p: (i)
√
a constant value of p and (ii) p = n. To ease the comparison, we also plotted the runtime of the
exact algorithm (Algorithm 3) detailed in Section 3.1.2 and RBS that uses binary segmentation
17
KernSeg Exact and Heuristic
4
4
1e+02
1e+03
Heuristic (p=10)
Heuristic (p=sqrt(n))
RBS
KS.Gau
4
1e+01
3
1
2
4
3
4
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
4
3
1e−01
2
4
1e+00
time in seconds
4
3
1
2
3
3
2
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
1
1e+03
1
1
1
5e+03
5e+04
5e+05
n
Figure 2: Runtime as a function of n (length of the signal) for Dmax = 100. Runtime of our approximation algorithm
√
with p = 100 (1-black) and p = n (2-orange), RBS (3-cyan), exact Algorithm 3 (4-red)
(see Section 4.2.3).
Our fast approximation algorithm (ApKS ) recovers a quadratic complexity if p =
√
n. However
its overhead is much smaller than that of the exact algorithm, which makes it more applicable than
the latter with large signals in practice. Note also that Figure 2 illustrates that ApKS returns the
solution in a matter of seconds with a sample size of n = 105 , which is much faster than Kernseg
(based on dynamic programming) that requires a few minutes. The RBS implementation involves
preliminary calculations which make it slower than ApKS with n ≤ 2 · 103 . However for larger
values (n ≥ 104 ) RBS is as fast as ApKS with p = 10.
4. Segmentation assessment
From a statistical point of view Kernseg provides the same performance as that of [3]. However
it greatly improves on the latter in terms of computational complexity as proved in Section 3.1.
In their simulation experiments [3] mainly focus on detecting change-points in the distribution of
R-valued data as well as of more structured objects such as histograms. Here we rather investigate
the performance of the kernel change-point procedure on specific two-dimensional biological data:
the DNA copy number and the BAF profiles (see Section 4.1.1). More precisely our experiments
highlight two main assets of applying reproducing kernels to these biological data: (i) reasonable
kernels avoid the need for modeling the type of change-points we are interested in and improve
upon state-of-the-art approaches in this biological context, and (ii) the high flexibility of kernels
facilitates data fusion, that is allows to combine different data-types and get more power to detect
true change-points.
In the following we first briefly introduce the type of data we are looking at, and describe our
18
simulation experiments obtained by resampling from a set of real annotated DNA profiles. Second,
we provide details about the change-point procedures involved in our comparison. We also define
the criteria used to assess the performance of the estimated segmentations. Finally, we report and
discuss the results of these experiments.
4.1. Data description
4.1.1. DNA copy number data
DNA copy number alterations are a hallmark of cancer cells [27]. The accurate detection and
interpretation of such changes are two important steps toward improved diagnosis and treatment.
Normal cells have two copies of DNA, inherited from each biological parent of the individual. In
tumor cells, parts of a chromosome of various sizes (from kilobases to a chromosome arm) can
be deleted, or copied several times. As a result, DNA copy numbers in tumor cells are piecewise
constant along the genome. Copy numbers can be measured using microarray or sequencing experiments. Figure 3 displays an example of copy number profiles that can be obtained from SNP-array
data [42].
The left panel (denoted by TCN) represents estimates of the total copy number (TCN). The
right panel (denoted by BAF) represents estimates of allele B fractions (BAF) using only homozygous position. We refer to [42] for an explanation of how these estimates are obtained. In the
normal region [0-2200], TCN is centered around two copies and BAF has three modes at 0, 1/2
and 1.
On top of Figure 3, numbers (a, b) represent each parental copy number in the corresponding
segment. For instance (0, 2) means that the total number of copies in the segment is 2. But a copy
from one of the two parents is missing while the other copy has been duplicated. Importantly any
(1,2)
(0,2)
(1,1)
(1,2)
(0,2)
0.5
BAF
2
0
0.0
1
TCN
3
1.0
4
(1,1)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
Figure 3: SNP array data. Total copy numbers (TCN), allelic ratios (BAF) along 10,000 genomic loci. Red
vertical lines represent change-points, and red horizontal lines represent estimated mean signal levels between two
change-points.
change in only one of the parental copy numbers is reflected in both TCN and BAF. Therefore it
makes sense to jointly analyze both dimensions to ease the identification of change-points.
19
10000
Importantly in the following, allelic ratios (BAF) are always symmetrized (or folded)– that
is we consider |BAF − 0.5|–to facilitate the segmentation task. This is common practice in the
field [51].
4.1.2. Generated data
Realistic DNA profiles with known truth (similar to that of Figure 3) have been generated
using the acnr package [45]. The constituted benchmark consists of profiles with 5, 000 positions
of heterozygous SNPs and exactly K = 10 change-points. As in [45] we only consider four biological
states for the segments. The acnr package allows to vary the difficulty level by adding normal cell
contamination, thus degrading tumor percentage. Three levels of difficulty have been considered
by varying tumor percentage: 100% (easy case), 70%, and 50% (difficult case). Figure 4 displays
three examples of simulated profiles (one for each tumor purity level).
100% tumor
1.00
3
BAF
TCN
0.75
2
0.50
0.25
1
0.00
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0
1000
2000
position
3000
4000
5000
3000
4000
5000
position
70% tumor
0.8
4
3
BAF
TCN
0.6
2
0.4
1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0
1000
2000
position
position
50% tumor
4
0.6
BAF
TCN
3
0.4
2
0.2
1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0
1000
2000
position
3000
4000
5000
position
Figure 4: Benchmark 1: Profiles simulated with the acnr package. Each line corresponds to a tumor percentage
(100%, 70% and 50%). The first column correspond to copy number (TCN) and the second to the allele B fraction
(BAF).
For each level, N = 50 profiles (with the same segment states and change-points) are generated
making a total of 150 simulated profiles both for BAF and TCN.
20
4.2. Competing procedures
4.2.1. Kernseg and ApKS
The implemented exact algorithm Kernseg (corresponding to Algorithm 3) and its fast approximation ApKS (based on binary segmentation) are applicable with any kernel (Gaussian,
exponential, polynomial, . . . ).
In our simulation experiments we consider three kernels.
• The first one is the so-called linear kernel defined by k(x, y) = hx, yi, where x, y ∈ R. It is
used as a benchmark since Kernseg with this kernel reduces to the procedure of [37]. The
corresponding procedure is denoted by KS.Lin.
• The second one is the Gaussian kernel defined for every x, y ∈ R by
#
"
2
− |x − y|
,
∀δ > 0.
kδ (x, y) = exp
δ
Since it belongs to the class of characteristic kernels [50], it is a natural choice to detect any
abrupt changes arising in the full distribution [3]. We call this procedure KS.Gau.
• The third one is the kernel associated with the energy-based distance introduced in Eq. (12)
with α = 1 and x0 = 0. This particular choice is the prescribed value in the ECP package
[32]. We call this procedure KS.ECP.
These three kernels allow to (i) illustrate the interest of characteristic kernels compared to non characteristic ones, and (ii) assess the performances of change-point detection with kernels (Kernseg)
compared to other approaches (ECP, RBS). However other characteristic kernels such as the
Laplace or exponential ones (see Section 2.2) could have been considered as well.
For all kernels we considered Dmax = 100. Note also that for all approaches and for both TCN
and BAF profiles we first scaled the data using a difference based estimator of the variance. To
√
be specific we get an estimator of the variances by dividing by 2 the median absolute deviation
of disjoint successive differences. This is common practice in the change-point literature (see for
example [22]). Such estimators are less sensitive to any shift in the mean than the classical ones.
For the Gaussian kernel we then used δ = 1.
As mentioned earlier, one main asset of kernels is that they allow to easily perform data
fusion, which consists here in combining several data profiles to increase the power of detecting
small changes arising at the same location in several of them. Here the joint segmentation of the
two-dimensional signal (TCN, BAF) is carried out by defining a new kernel as the sum of two
coordinate-wise kernels [5], that is
k(x1 , x2 ) = k(c1 , c2 ) + k(b1 , b2 )
(18)
with x1 = (c1 , b1 ) and x2 = (c2 , b2 ) where the first coordinates of x1 and x2 refer to TCN and the
second ones to BAF.
21
Remark 4. Let us point out that many alternative ways exist to build such a “joint kernel”, using
the standard machinery of reproducing kernels exposed in [5, 24].
For instance replacing the sum in Eq. (18) by a product of kernels is possible. With the Gaussian
kernel, this amounts to consider one Gaussian kernel applied to a mixture of squared norms where
each coordinate receives a different weight depending on its influence. Another promising direction
is to exploit some available side information about the importance of each coordinate in detecting
change-points. This can be done by considering a convex sum of kernels where the weights reflect
this a priori knowledge.
Finally let us mention that designing the optimal kernel for a learning task is a widely open
problem in the literature even if some attempts exist (see Section 7.2 in [2] for a thorough discussion,
and [26] for a first partial answer with two-sample tests).
4.2.2. ECP
The ECP procedure [40] (earlier discussed in Section 2.6) has been also introduced in our
comparison since it allows us to detect changes in the distribution of multivariate observations.
We used the implementation provided by the authors in the R-package [32]. We used the
default parameters α = 1 and ` = 30 (minimum length of any segment). Let us notice that, unlike
our kernel-based procedures relying on efficiently minimizing a prescribed penalized criterion, ECP
chooses the number of segments by iteratively testing each new candidate change-point by means
of a permutation test, which makes it highly time-consuming on large profiles (around 15 minutes
per profiles for n = 5000 compared to 5 seconds for KS.Gau).
4.2.3. Recursive Binary Segmentation (RBS)
In the recent paper by [45], it has been shown that for a known number of change-points the Recursive Binary Segmentation (RBS) [25] is a state-of-the-art change-point procedure for analyzing
(TCN, BAF) profiles. RBS is a two-step procedure. In a first step it uses the binary segmentation
heuristic (described in Section 3.2.2) on the (TCN) or (TCN,BAF) profile. In a second step it
uses dynamic programming on the set of changes identified by the binary segmentation heuristic.
We refer interested readers to [45] for a discussion as to why RBS can outperform a pure dynamic
programming strategy despite the fact that it provides only an approximation to the targeted
optimization problem.
Since the present biological context is the same as that of [45], we therefore decided to carry
out the comparison between our kernel-based procedures and RBS.
From a computational perspective RBS relies on the binary segmentation algorithm described
in Algorithm 5. The final segmentation output by RBS is then an approximate solution to the
optimization problem (in the same way as ApKS ), while being efficiently computed as illustrated
by Figure 2.
22
4.3. Performance assessment
The quality of the resulting segmentations is quantified in two ways. First we infer the ability of
the procedure to provide a reliable estimate of the regression function by computing the quadratic
risk of the estimator based on the TCN profile (Section 4.3.1). Second, we also assess the quality
of the estimated segmentations by measuring the discrepancy between the true and estimated
change-points using the Frobenius distance (Section 4.3.2).
4.3.1. Risk of a segmentation
From a practical point of view, there is no hope to recover true change-points in regions where
the signal-to-noise ratio is too low without including false positives, which we would like to avoid.
In such non-asymptotic settings, the quality of the estimated segmentation τ can be measured by
the risk R(fˆτ ) which measures the gap between the regression function f = (f1 , . . . , fn ) ∈ Rn and
its piecewise-constant estimator based on τ , that is fˆτ = fˆ1τ , . . . , fˆnτ ∈ Rn . This risk is defined
by
n
2
1X
τ
τ
ˆ
ˆ
E fi − fi
.
R(f ) =
n i=1
In the following simulation results, the risks of all segmentations are always computed with respect
to the regression function of the corresponding TCN profile.
4.3.2. Frobenius distance
We also quantify the gap between a segmentation τ and the true segmentation τ ∗ by using the Frobenius distance [36] between matrices as follows. First, for any segmentation τ =
τ
(τ1 , τ2 , . . . , τD ), let us introduce a matrix M τ = Mi,j
such that
1≤i,j≤n
τ
Mi,j
=
D
X
1(τk ≤i,j<τk+1 )
k=1
τk+1 − τk
,
(with τ1 = 1 and τD+1 = n + 1 by convention)
τ
where 1(τk ≤i,j<τk+1 ) = 1, if i, j ∈ [τk , τk+1 [∩N, and 0 otherwise. Note that Mi,j
6= 0 if and only
if i, j are in the same segment of τ , which leads to a block-diagonal matrix with D blocks (whose
squared Frobenius norm is equal to D). The idea behind the value in each block of this matrix is to
define a one-to-one mapping between the set of segmentations in D segments and matrices whose
squared Frobenius norm is D.
?
Let us now consider the matrix M τ defined from the true segmentation τ ∗ in the same way.
Then, the Frobenius distance between segmentations τ and τ ∗ is given, through the distance
?
between matrices M τ and M τ , by
dF (τ, τ ? ) = M τ − M τ
?
F
23
v
uX
u n
τ − M τ ? 2.
=t
Mi,j
i,j
i,j=1
4.4. Results
In our experiments, we successively considered two types of signals: (i) the total copy number
profiles (TCN) and (ii) the joint profiles in R2 made of (TCN,BAF).
4.4.1. Comparison with KS.Lin and ECP for a high tumor percentage (easy case)
First we compare all approaches in the simple case where the tumor percentage is equal to 100%.
The performances, using only the TCN or the (TCN,BAF) profiles, are reported in Figure 5 and
measured in terms of accuracy (Left) and risk (Right).
Accuracy (100)
LossInCn (100)
TCN
TCN + BAF
TCN
TCN + BAF
2.0
2.0
●
●
1.0
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Risk in TCN
Accuracy (Frobenius distance)
1.8
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.2
●
0.5
1.0
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.0
RBS
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
ECP
●
●
●
●
●
RBS
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
ECP
●
0.8
●
RBS
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
ECP
RBS
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
ECP
Figure 5: Accuracy (left) and Risk (right) on TCN and (TCN,BAF) profiles with a tumor percentage of 100%.
Boxplots of RBS, ECP, KS.Lin, KS.Gau and KS.ECP for their selected number of change-points (D̂) are shown.
In all these experiments RBS clearly performs badly. We believe this is mostly due to the poor
estimation of the number of segments made by RBS. Indeed the performances of RBS are closer
to the ones of other approaches when considering the true number of segments (results not shown
here).
We then compare KS.Lin to KS.Gau, KS.ECP, and ECP. With TCN data, KS.Lin has a small
advantage over KS.Gau (with an average accuracy difference of 0.03 and a p-value of 0.012) and
ECP (with an average accuracy difference of 0.1 and p-values of 0.007). This is also true when
considering the risk. KS.ECP has a slightly better empirical average accuracy than KS.Lin but this
difference is not significant. Let us also mention that none of the differences are found significant
with the (TCN, BAF) profiles. It is our opinion that in this simple scenario all true changepoints arise mostly in the mean of the distribution. Thus it is noticeable that the performances
of approaches also looking for changes in the whole distribution (like ECP, KS.Gau, KS.ECP) are
(almost) on par with those specifically looking for change-points in the mean (like KS.Lin and RBS
for the true number of change-points D? ).
We also compared ECP to KS.Gau and KS.ECP. We found no differences except between ECP
and KS.ECP for TCN profiles. In that case KS.ECP has significantly better accuracy and risk
than ECP. But this difference remains small as can be seen on Figure 5.
Note that for all approaches, performances on (TCN,BAF) profiles are slightly better than
those with TCN profiles (p-values smaller than 10−4 ).
24
TCN: Accuracy ( 50 )
1.8
min.size=0
RBS/ECP
min.size=30
Accuracy (Frobenius distance)
1.6
1.4
●
●
1.2
1.0
RBS
ECP
KS.Lin.
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
KS.Lin
KS.Gauss
KS.ECP
Figure 6: Performances of KS.Lin, KS.Gau and KS.ECP for the true number of changepoints D? = 10 with or
without a constraint on the minimal size of segments (left: ` ≥ 1, right: ` ≥ 30). The results for RBS and ECP for
D? = 10 are also reported. RBS does not include a constraint while ECP has a default minimal size of 30.
.
4.4.2. Constraint on the segment sizes for a low tumor percentage (difficult case)
We then turn to the more difficult case where the tumor percentage is equal to 50%. In this
scenario excluding segments with less than 30 points (as is done by default in ECP) is beneficial.
Figure 6 illustrates this strong improvement when adding this constraint to KS.Lin, KS.Gau and
KS.ECP and when considering the true number of change-points D? = 10 (p-values of respectively
(8.10−9 , 9.10−3 and 10−4 ). More generally it is our experience that such a constraint can greatly
improve performances when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. For this reason, in the remainder of
our experiments and for a tumor percentage of 50%, we will report results including the constraint
on the segment sizes (` = 30). Let us also mention that for higher tumor percentages adding the
constraint does not change the segmentation in D? segments recovered by KS.Lin, KS.Gau and
KS.ECP.
4.4.3. Comparison with KS.Lin and ECP for a low tumor percentage (difficult case)
We compared KS.Lin to KS.Gau, KS.ECP, and ECP for a tumor percentage of 50%. The
accuracy of all these approaches is reported in Figure 7. The minimum length of any segment is
fixed at ` = 30 for all approaches (except RBS as it is not possible) and the number of segments
is estimated.
In all these experiments RBS performs badly. We believe this is because it poorly selects the
number of segments and also because it does not include a constraint on segment sizes.
We compared KS.Lin to KS.Gau, KS.ECP, and ECP. For both TCN and (TCN,BAF) profiles
KS.Lin performs worse than KS.Gau, KS.ECP, and ECP in terms of accuracy and risk (all p25
Accuracy (50)
2.5
LossInCn (50)
TCN
TCN + BAF
TCN
TCN + BAF
●
2.5
●
Risk in TCN
Accuracy (Frobenius distance)
●
2.0
1.5
2.0
●
●
1.5
●
1.0
●
●
●
RBS
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
ECP
RBS
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
ECP
RBS
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
ECP
RBS
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
ECP
Figure 7: Accuracy (left) and Risk (right) on TCN and (TCN,BAF) profiles with a tumor percentage of 50%.
Boxplots of RBS, ECP, KS.Lin, KS.Gau and KS.ECP for their selected number of changepoints (D̂) are shown.
values are smaller than 2.10−4 ). In this more difficult scenario, changes do not arise only in the
mean of the distribution, which gives an advantage to approaches looking for changes in the whole
distribution and not only in the mean as KS.Lin does.
We then compare ECP to KS.Gau and KS.ECP. First, KS.Gau seems to have a slightly better
accuracy and risk than ECP for both TCN and (TCN,BAF) profiles. Two of these differences are
found significant with a cut-off of 5% and none with a cut-off of 1%. This leads us to conclude
that ECP and KS.Gau have similar performances in the present experiments. Second, KS.ECP
has a slightly better accuracy and risk than ECP in TCN for both TCN and (TCN,BAF) profiles.
All of these differences are found significant (for the accuracy in (TCN,BAF) p = 0.0076, in TCN
p = 0.015, for the risk in (TCN,BAF) p = 0.0081 and in TCN p = 0.00016). Although significant
these differences remain small (about three times smaller than the differences between KS.Lin and
ECP).
Finally it should be noted that KS.ECP is faster than ECP for a profile of n = 5000 (5 seconds
against 15 minutes). All of this leads to conclude that, in our simulation experiments, KS.Gau
and KS.ECP are the best change-point detection procedures among the considered ones since they
perform as well as ECP while being by far less memory and time consuming.
4.4.4. Estimation of the number of segments including the minimum length constraint
Let us now assess the behaviour of the model selection procedure derived in Section 2.5 by
taking into account the new constraint on the minimal length of the candidate segments.
From Figure 8 it can be seen that whatever the kernel the performances of the Kernseg procedure at the estimated number of segments are worse than those at D? . But this difference
remains very small. This empirically validates the use of our modified penalty taking into account
a constraint on the size of the segments. We recall that adding this constraint is important in
low-signal-to-noise settings, which are common in practice.
26
TCN: Accuracy (50)
D*
●
^
D
Accuracy (Frobenius distance)
2.0
1.8
●
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
●
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
KS.Lin
KS.Gau
KS.ECP
Figure 8: Accuracy of KS.Lin, KS.Gau and KS.ECP on (TCN,BAF) for a tumor percentage of 50% for D∗ (left)
and D̂ (right).
4.4.5. Quality of the approximation
The purpose of the present section is to illustrate the behaviour of ApKS (in terms of statistical
precision) as an alternative to Kernseg (which is more time consuming). Since we do not provide
any theoretical warranty on the model selection performances of ApKS , we only show its results
for several values of p ∈ {4, 10, 40, 80, 160} at the true number of segments D? . For each value
of p and each of the TCN and BAF profiles, we compute the approximation by: (i) evaluating
the smallest and largest observed value (respectively denoted by m and M ), (ii) using an equally
spaced grid of p deterministic values between m and M and (iii) use those p values to perform the
approximation of the Gram matrix.
From Figure 9 it clearly appears that the number of points used to build the low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix is an influential parameter that has to be carefully fixed. However
as long as p is chosen large enough, the approximation seems to provide very similar results. This
suggests that one should find a trade-off between the statistical performances and the computation
cost. Indeed from a statistical point of view increasing p is beneficial (or at least not detrimental).
In contrast from a computationnal point of view increasing p is detrimental and increases the
complexity in time (O(p2 n)).
Let us finally emphasize that for large enough p the performances of ApKS are very close to
those of KS.Gau. Given the low time complexity of ApKS compared to KS.Gau we argue that for
large profiles (n 105 ) ApKS could be an interesting alternative to KS.Gau.
Nevertheless several questions related to the use of ApKS remain open. For instance, the
optimal way to build the low-rank approximation of the Gram matrix is a challenging question
which can be embedded in the more general problem of choosing the optimal kernel. Designing a
theoretically grounded penalized criterion to perform model selection with ApKS is also a crucial
problem which remains to be addressed.
27
TCN+BAF: Accuracy ( 100 )
Accuracy (Frobenius distance)
1.5
1.0
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.5
0.0
●
Ap4KS.Gau
Figure 9:
Ap10KS.Gau
Ap40KS.Gau
Ap80KS.Gau
Ap160KS.Gau
KS.Gau
Accuracy of ApKS with the Gaussian Kernel and for various p and of KS.Gau on (TCN,BAF) for a
tumor percentage of 50% for D∗.
5. Conclusion
Existing nonparametric change-point detection procedures such as that of [3] exhibit promising
statistical performances. Yet their high computational costs (time and memory) are severe limitations that often make it difficult to use for practitioners. Therefore an important task is to develop
computationally efficient algorithms (leading to exact or approximate solutions) reducing the time
and memory costs of these statistically effective procedures.
In this paper we focus on the multiple change-points detection framework with reproducing
kernels. We have detailed a versatile (i.e. applicable to any kernel) exact algorithm which is
quadratic in time and linear in space. We also provided a versatile approximation algorithm which
is linear both in time and space and allows to deal with very large signals (n ≥ 106 ) on a standard
laptop. The computational efficiency in time and space of these two new algorithms has been
illustrated on empirical simulation experiments showing that the new algorithms is more efficient
than its direct competitor ECP. The statistical accuracy of our kernel-based procedures has been
empirically assessed in the setting of DNA copy numbers and allele B fraction profiles. In particular,
results illustrate that characteristic kernels (enabling the detection of changes in any moment of
the distribution) can lead to better performances than procedures dedicated to detecting changes
arising only in the mean.
Acknowledgements
This work has been funded by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) under
reference ANR-11-BS01-0010, by the CNRS under the PEPS BeFast, by the CPER Nord-Pas
de Calais/FEDER DATA Advanced data science and technologies 2015-2020, and by Chaire
d’excellence 2011-2015 Inria/Lille 2.
28
References
References
[1] Arlot, S., Celisse, A., 2011. Segmentation of the mean of heteroscedastic data via cross-validation. Stat. Comput.
21 (4), 613–632.
[2] Arlot, S., Celisse, A., Harchaoui, Z., Feb. 2012. Kernel change-point detection. ArXiv:1202.3878v1.
[3] Arlot, S., Celisse, A., Harchaoui, Z., 2012. A kernel multiple change-point algorithm via model selection. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1202.3878.
[4] Aronszajn, N., 1950. Theory of reproducing kernels. Transactions of the American mathematical society 68 (3),
337–404.
[5] Aronszajn, N., May 1950. Theory of reproducing kernels. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
68 (3), 337–404.
[6] Auger, I. E., Lawrence, C. E., 1989. Algorithms for the optimal identification of segment neighborhoods.
Bulletin of mathematical biology 51 (1), 39–54.
[7] Auger, I. E., Lawrence, C. E., 1989. Algorithms for the optimal identification of segment neighborhoods.
Bulletin of mathematical biology 51 (1), 39–54.
[8] Bach, F., 2013. Sharp analysis of low-rank kernel matrix approximations. In: In Proc. COLT, 2013. pp. 185–209.
[9] Bellman, R., 1961. On the approximation of curves by line segments using dynamic programming. Communications of the ACM 4 (6), 284.
[10] Berg, C., Christensen, J. P. R., Ressel, P., 1984. Harmonic Analysis on Semigroups. Springer, New-York.
[11] Berlinet, A., Thomas-Agnan, C., 2004. Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces in probability and statistics. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, with a preface by Persi Diaconis.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9096-9
[12] Birgé, L., Massart, P., 2007. Minimal penalties for Gaussian model selection. Probab. Theory Related Fields
138 (1-2), 33–73.
[13] Brodsky, E., Darkhovsky, B. S., 2013. Nonparametric methods in change point problems. Vol. 243. Springer
Science & Business Media.
[14] Christmann, A., Steinwart, I., 2010. Universal kernels on non-standard input spaces. In: Advances in neural
information processing systems. pp. 406–414.
[15] Cleynen, A., Dudoit, S., Robin, S., 2014. Comparing segmentation methods for genome annotation based on
rna-seq data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 19 (1), 101–118.
[16] Cleynen, A., Koskas, M., Lebarbier, E., Rigaill, G., Robin, S., 2014. Segmentor3isback: an r package for the
fast and exact segmentation of seq-data. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 9, 6.
[17] Cleynen, A., Lebarbier, E., 2014. Segmentation of the poisson and negative binomial rate models: a penalized
estimator. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 18, 750–769.
[18] Cormen, T. H., 2009. Introduction to algorithms. MIT press.
[19] Dieuleveut, A., Bach, F., 2016. Nonparametric stochastic approximation with large step-sizes. The Annals of
Statistics 44 (4), 1363–1399.
[20] Drineas, P., Mahoney, M. W., 2005. On the nyström method for approximating a gram matrix for improved
kernel-based learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research 6, 2153–2175.
[21] Fine, S., Scheinberg, K., Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J., Williamson, B., 2001. Efficient svm training using
low-rank kernel representations. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2, 243–264.
[22] Fryzlewicz, P., 2014. Wild binary segmentation for multiple change-point detection. The Annals of Statistics
42 (6), 2243–2281.
[23] Garreau, D., Arlot, S., 2016. Consistent change-point detection with kernels. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.04740.
[24] Gartner, T., 2008. Kernels for structured data. Vol. 72. World Scientific.
[25] Gey, S., Lebarbier, E., 2008. Using cart to detect multiple change points in the mean for large sample. Tech.
29
rep., HAL.
URL https://hal.inria.fr/file/index/docid/327146/filename/article_CART.pdf
[26] Gretton, A., Sejdinovic, D., Strathmann, H., Balakrishnan, S., Pontil, M., Fukumizu, K., Sriperumbudur, B. K.,
2012. Optimal kernel choice for large-scale two-sample tests. In: Advances in neural information processing
systems. pp. 1205–1213.
[27] Hanahan, D., Weinberg, R. A., 2011. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144 (5), 646–674.
[28] Harchaoui, Z., Cappé, O., 2007. Retrospective mutiple change-point estimation with kernels. In: Statistical
Signal Processing, 2007. SSP’07. IEEE/SP 14th Workshop on. IEEE, pp. 768–772.
[29] Hautaniemi, A. R., Kauraniemi, S., Yli-Harja, P., Astola, O., Wolf, J., Kallioniemi, M., 2003. A cgh-plotter:
Matlab toolbox for cgh-data analysis. Bioinformatics 13 (1714–1715).
[30] Haynes, K., Eckley, I. A., Fearnhead, P., 2017. Computationally efficient changepoint detection for a range of
penalties. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 26 (1), 134–143.
[31] Hocking, T., Schleiermacher, G., Janoueix-Lerosey, I., Boeva, V., Cappo, J., Delattre, O., Bach, F., Vert, J.-P.,
2013. Learning smoothing models of copy number profiles using breakpoint annotations. BMC Bioinformatics
14 (1), 164.
[32] James, N. A., Matteson, D. S., 2013. ecp: An r package for nonparametric multiple change point analysis of
multivariate data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.3295.
URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ecp/index.html
[33] Jong, K., Marchiori, E., van der Vaart, A., Ylstra, B., Weiss, M., Meijer, G., 2003. Applications of evolutionary
computing. In: EvoWorkshops 2003: Proceedings. Vol. 2611 of chap. chromosomal breakpoint detection in
human cancer. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, pp. 54–65.
[34] Killick, R., Fearnhead, P., Eckley, I., 2012. Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost.
Journal of the American Statistical Association 107 (500), 1590–1598.
[35] Lai, Y., Jun. 2012. Change-Point analysis of paired Allele-Specific copy number variation data. Journal of
Computational Biology 19 (6), 679–693.
[36] Lajugie, R., Bach, F., Arlot, S., 2014. Large-margin metric learning for constrained partitioning problems. In:
International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 297–305.
[37] Lebarbier, E., Apr. 2005. Detecting multiple change-points in the mean of gaussian process by model selection.
Signal Process. 85 (4), 717–736.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2004.11.012
[38] Ledoux, M., Talagrand, M., 1991. Probability in Banach spaces. Vol. 23 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und
ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, isoperimetry
and processes.
[39] Maidstone, R., Hocking, T., Rigaill, G., Fearnhead, P., 2017. On optimal multiple changepoint algorithms for
large data. Statistics and Computing 27 (2), 519–533.
[40] Matteson, D. S., James, N. A., 2014. A nonparametric approach for multiple change point analysis of multivariate data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 109 (505), 334–345.
[41] Matteson, D. S., James, N. A., 2014. A nonparametric approach for multiple change point analysis of multivariate data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 109 (505), 334–345.
[42] Neuvial, P., Bengtsson, H., Speed, T. P., Mar. 2011. Statistical analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism
microarrays in cancer studies. In: Handbook of Statistical Bioinformatics, 1st Edition. Springer Handbooks of
Computational Statistics. Springer, pp. 225–255.
[43] Olshen, A. B., Venkatraman, E. S., Lucito, R., Wigler, M., 2004. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis
of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 5 (4), 557–572.
[44] Picard, F., Robin, S., Lavielle, M., Vaisse, C., Daudin, J.-J., Jan. 2005. A statistical approach for array-CGH
data analysis. BMC bioinformatics 6, 27.
URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15705208
[45] Pierre-Jean, M., Rigaill, G., Neuvial, P., 2014. Performance evaluation of DNA copy number segmentation
30
methods. Briefings in Bioinformatics.
URL http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/09/08/bib.bbu026.abstract
[46] Rigaill, G., 2015. A pruned dynamic programming algorithm to recover the best segmentations with 1 to k max
change-points. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique 156 (4), 180–205.
[47] Rigaill, G., Lebarbier, É., Robin, S., 2012. Exact posterior distributions and model selection criteria for multiple
change-point detection problems. Statistics and Computing 22 (4), 917–929.
[48] Sejdinovic, D., Sriperumbudur, B., Gretton, A., Fukumizu, K., 2013. Equivalence of distance-based and RKHSbased statistics in hypothesis testing. The Annals of Statistics 41 (5), 2263–2291.
[49] Smola, A. J., Schölkopf, B., 2000. Sparse greedy matrix approximation for machine learning. In: Proceedings
of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML ’00. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 911–918.
URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645529.657980
[50] Sriperumbudur, B. K., Fukumizu, K., Lanckriet, G. R., 2010. On the relation between universality, characteristic kernels and rkhs embedding of measures. In: Proc. of 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence
and Statistics. pp. 773–780.
[51] Staaf, J., Lindgren, D., Vallon-Christersson, J., Isaksson, A., et al., Oct. 2008. Segmentation-based detection
of allelic imbalance and loss-of-heterozygosity in cancer cells using whole genome SNP arrays. Genome Biol
9 (9), R136.
[52] Williams, C., Seeger, M., 2001. Using the Nyström method to speed up kernel machines. In: Advances in
Neural Information Processing Systems 13. MIT Press, pp. 682–688.
[53] Yang, T., 2012. Simple binary segmentation frameworks for identifying variation in DNA copy number. BMC
bioinformatics 13 (1), 277.
31
| 10math.ST
|
EXISTENCE OF ALMOST COHEN-MACAULAY ALGEBRAS IMPLIES
THE EXISTENCE OF BIG COHEN-MACAULAY ALGEBRAS
arXiv:1601.03335v2 [math.AC] 29 Mar 2016
RAJSEKHAR BHATTACHARYYA
Abstract. In [1], the dagger closure is extended over finitely generated modules over
Noetherian local domain (R, m) and it is proved to be a Dietz closure. In this short note
we show that it also satisfies the ‘Algebra axiom’ of [9] and this leads to the following
result of this paper: For a complete Noetherian local domain, if it is contained in an almost Cohen-Macaulay domain, then there exists a balanced big Cohen-Macaulay algebra
over it.
1. introduction
A big Cohen-Macaulay algebra over a local ring (R, m) is an R-algebra B such that
some system of parameters of R is a regular sequence on B. It is balanced if every system
of parameters of R is a regular sequence on B. Big Cohen-Macaulay algebras exist in equal
characteristic [7], [6] and also in mixed characteristic when dim R ≤ 3 [8]. The existence of
big Cohen-Macaulay algebras is extremely important as for example, it gives new proofs
for many of the homological conjectures, such as the direct summand conjecture, monomial
conjecture, and vanishing conjecture for maps of Tor.
In equal characteristic, the tight closure operation has been used to present proofs of
the existence of balanced big Cohen-Macaulay modules and algebras. In [2], a list of seven
axioms for a closure operation is defined for finitely generated modules over a complete
local domain R. Any closure operation which satisfies these seven axioms is called Dietz
closure. A Dietz closure is powerful enough to produce big Cohen-Macaulay modules. It
is to be noted that, in a recent work of Dietz [3], axioms are extended beyond finitely
generated modules.
In this context, it is worth it to recall the definition of an almost Cohen-Macaulay
algebra ([10]): Let A be an algebra over a Noetherian local domain (R, m), equipped with
a normalized value map v : A → R ∪ {∞}. A is called almost Cohen-Macaulay if each
element of ((x1 , . . . , xi−1 )A :A xi )/(x1 , . . . , xi−1 )A is annihilated by elements of sufficiently
small order with respect to v for all system of parameters x1 , . . . , xd of A.
In [1], using the algebra with normalized value map, we extend the definition of dagger
closure to the finitely generated modules over local domain and we showed that dagger
closure is a Dietz closure ([1], Proposition 4.5) when A is almost Cohen-Macaulay. As
a consequence we showed that for a complete Noetherian local domain, if it is contained
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13C14.
Key words and phrases. Almost Cohen-Macaulay, Big Cohen-Macaulay, Closure operation.
1
2
RAJSEKHAR BHATTACHARYYA
in an almost Cohen-Macaulay domain, then there exists a balanced big Cohen-Macaulay
module over it ([1], Corollary 4.6).
Recently, in [9], an additional axiom is introduced, which is known as the ‘Algebra
Axiom’, and it is shown there that many closure operations satisfy this axiom. It is also
proved that a local domain R has a Dietz closure that satisfies the Algebra Axiom if and
only if R has a big Cohen-Macaulay algebra. In this short note we show that dagger
closure as in [1] also satisfies the ‘Algebra axiom’ of [9]. This leads us to the following
result of this paper.
Theorem 1 (Theorem 3.2). For a complete Noetherian local domain, if it is contained
in an almost Cohen-Macaulay domain, then there exists a balanced big Cohen-Macaulay
algebra over it.
In [8], Hochster proves the existence of weakly functorial big Cohen-Macaulay algebras
from the existence of almost Cohen-Macaulay algebras when dim R ≤ 3. Our result
provides a partial extension that is not tied to the Krull dimension of the ring.
2. preliminary results
Hochster and Huneke defined dagger closure for ideals in a local domain via elements
of small order. See [4]. We previously extended that notion as follows:
Definition 2.1. ([1]) Let A be a local algebra with a normalized valuation v : A → R∪{∞}
v if
and M be an A-module. Consider a submodule N ⊂ M . Given x ∈ M , we say x ∈ NM
for every ǫ > 0, there exists a ∈ A such that v(a) < ǫ and ax ∈ N .
Now we extend the definition of dagger closure to finitely generated modules ([1]) and
we call this new closure as dagger closure to local domains contained in such an A as
above.
Definition 2.2. Let (R, m) be a Noetherian local domain and let A be a local domain
containing R with a normalized valuation v : A → R ∪ {∞}. For any finitely generated
v if 1 ⊗ x ∈
R-module M and for its submodule N , given x ∈ M we say that x ∈ NM
v the dagger closure of N inside M .
im(A ⊗ N → A ⊗ M )vA⊗M . We call NM
We recall the definition of Dietz closure.
Definition 2.3. For a Noetherian local domain, if a closure operation satisfies all the
axioms of Axiom 1.1 of [2], then it is defined as Dietz closure.
We restate the results of Proposition 4.5 and Corollary 4.6 of [1] in a single theorem.
Theorem 2.4. Let R be a complete Noetherian local domain and let A be a local domain
containing R, equipped with a normalized valuation v : A → R ∪ {∞}. Consider the dagger
closure operation as defined in Definition 2.2. If A is an almost Cohen-Macaulay algebra,
then dagger closure becomes a Dietz closure. Moreover in this case, there exists a balanced
big Cohen-Macaulay module over R.
EXISTENCE OF ALMOST COHEN-MACAULAY ALGEBRAS IMPLIES THE EXISTENCE OF BIG COHEN-MACAULAY ALGEBRA
As mentioned earlier, in [3], axioms are extended beyond finitely generated modules.
These new axioms should imply that dagger closure (as defined in Definition 2.2) is a Dietz
closure even without assuming that the module is finitely generated. The new work also
extends the definition of phantom extensions for non finitely generated modules.
We recall the definition of phanton extension for a closure operation (see [5] and [2]). Let
R be a ring with a closure operation cl, M a finitely generated R-module, and α : R → M
an injective map with cokernel Q. We have a short exact sequence
α
0 −−−−→ R −−−−→ M −−−−→ Q −−−−→ 0.
Let P• be a projective resolution (equivalently, free resolution since R is local) for Q over
R. Then, this yields the following commutative diagram
0 −−−−→
x
α
R −−−−→
x
φ
M −−−−→
x
Q −−−−→ 0
x
id
d
P2 −−−−→ P1 −−−−→ P0 −−−−→ Q −−−−→ 0.
Let ǫ ∈ Ext1R (Q, R) be the element corresponding to this short exact sequence via the
Yoneda correspondence. We say that α is a cl-phantom extension, if for above projective
resolution P• of Q, a cocycle representing ǫ in HomR (P1 , R) is in im(HomR (P0 , R) →
HomR (P1 , R))cl
HomR (P1 ,R) . When closure operation is dagger closure as defined above, we
call cl-phantom extension as ‘dag-phantom’ extension.
α
The Algebra Axiom of [9] states that: For any closure operation cl, if R → M, is clα′
phantom, then the map R → Sym2 (M ), sending 1 7→ α(1) ⊗ α(1) is also cl-phantom. The
author proves (Theorem 3.3) that if a local domain R has a Dietz closure cl that satisfies
the Algebra axiom, then R has a balanced big Cohen-Macaulay algebra.
3. main result
In this section we prove the main theorem. We begin with the following lemma.
Lemma 3.1. Let R be a complete Noetherian local domain and let A be an almost CohenMacaulay local domain containing R, possessing a normalized valuation map v : A →
R ∪ {∞}. For a finitely generated R-module M , an injection α : R → M is dag-phantom
if and only if for every ǫ > 0, there exist an element a ∈ A with v(a) < ǫ and an Amodule homomorphism idA ⊗R γǫ : A ⊗R M → A, such that (idA ⊗R γǫ ) ◦ (idA ⊗R α) =
a(idA ⊗R idR ).
Proof. Since A is a torsion free R-module ([9], Lemma 3.9), A
idA ⊗R α
→
A ⊗R M is injective.
Observe the short exact sequence
α
0 −−−−→ R −−−−→ M −−−−→ Q −−−−→ 0,
and let P• projective resolution of Q. This implies the following commutative diagram
where A ⊗R P• is a projective resolution (equivalently, free resolution) of A ⊗R Q over A.
4
RAJSEKHAR BHATTACHARYYA
0
x
−−−−→
id ⊗ α
R
A
−−A−−−
→ A ⊗R M −−−−→ A ⊗R Q −−−−→ 0
x
x
x
id ⊗ φ
id
A R
id ⊗ d
R
A ⊗R P2 −−−−→ A ⊗R P1 −−A−−−
→ A ⊗R P0 −−−−→ A ⊗R Q −−−−→ 0.
Now consider the following statement: For every ǫ > 0, there exist an element a ∈ A
with v(a) < ǫ and an A-module homomorphism idA ⊗R γǫ : A ⊗R M → A, such that
(idA ⊗R γǫ ) ◦ (idA ⊗R α) = a(idA ⊗R idR ). Clearly, this is true if and only if,
a(idA ⊗R φ) ∈ im(A ⊗R HomR (P0 , R) → A ⊗R HomR (P1 , R)),
by Lemma 5.6 of [5]. This is equivalent to
a(idA ⊗R φ) ∈ im(A ⊗R B → A ⊗R HomR (P1 , R)),
where B is the module of coboundaries in HomR (P1 , R). Further from definition of dagger
v
closure, this is equivalent to φ ∈ BHom
. Finally, from Lemma 5.6 of [5] again, the
R (P1 ,R)
α
last statement is equivalent to the fact that the map R → M is dag-phantom.
Now we state our main result.
Theorem 3.2. Let R be a complete Noetherian local domain and let A be an almost CohenMacaulay local domain containing R, possessing a normalized valuation v : A → R ∪ {∞}.
Then there exists a balanced big Cohen-Macaulay algebra over R.
Proof. Consider the dagger closure operation as defined in Definition 2.2 of the previous
section and from Theorem 2.4, we know that it is a Dietz closure. Now, if we can show
that this dagger closure also satisfies ‘Algebra axiom’ as stated in [9], then using Theorem
3.3 of [9], we can conclude.
To see that dagger closure satisfies the ‘Algebra axiom’ of [9], we assume that injective
α
map R → M is dag-phantom, where M is a finitely generated R-module. From Lemma
3.1, this is equivalent to the fact that for every ǫ > 0, there exist an element a ∈ A
with v(a) < ǫ and an A-module homomorphism idA ⊗R γǫ : A ⊗R M → A, such that
(idA ⊗R γǫ ) ◦ (idA ⊗R α) = a(idA ⊗R idR ). We need to show that α′ : R → Sym2 (M ) is
also dag-phantom, where α′ (1) = α(1) ⊗ α(1). For ǫ > 0, take a ∈ A with v(a) < ǫ/2
such that (idA ⊗R γǫ/2 ) ◦ (idA ⊗R α) = a(idA ⊗R idR ). Set b = a2 and from properties
of valuation, v(b) < ǫ. Since symmetric algebra commutes with base change, we define
idA ⊗R γǫ′ : A ⊗R Sym2 (M ) → A by
(idA ⊗R γǫ′ )(a ⊗ (m ⊗ m′ )) = aγǫ/2 (m)γǫ/2 (m′ ).
Then
(idA ⊗R γǫ′ )((idA ⊗R α′ )(1)) = (idA ⊗R γǫ′ )(1 ⊗ (α(1) ⊗ α(1))) = (γǫ/2 (α(1)))2 = a2 = b,
since
γǫ/2 (α(1)) = 1 ⊗ γǫ/2 (α(1)) = (idA ⊗R γǫ/2 α)(1 ⊗ 1) = (idA ⊗R γǫ/2 ) ◦ (idA ⊗R α)(1 ⊗ 1) =
EXISTENCE OF ALMOST COHEN-MACAULAY ALGEBRAS IMPLIES THE EXISTENCE OF BIG COHEN-MACAULAY ALGEBRA
a(idA ⊗R idR )(1 ⊗ 1) = a.
Again, using Lemma 3.1, we get that α′ is also dag-phantom and thus we conclude.
Acknowledgement . I would like thank the referee for careful reading of the paper and for
all the valuable comments and suggestions for the improvement of the paper.
References
[1] M. Asgharzadeh and R. Bhattacharyya, Applications of closure operations on big Cohen-Macaulay
algebras, J. Algebra Appl. 11 (2012), no. 4.
[2] G. Dietz, Characterization of closure operation that induced big Cohen-Macaulay algebra, Proc. AMS
138 (2010), 3849-3862.
[3] G. Dietz, Axiomatic closure operations, Phantom extensions, and Solidity, arXiv:1511.04286.
[4] M. Hochster and C. Huneke, Tight closure and elements of small order in integral extensions, Journal
of Pure and Applied Algebra 71 (1991), 233-247.
[5] M. Hochster and C. Huneke, Tight closure of parameter ideals and splitting in module finite extensions,
J. Algebraic Geom. 3 (1994), no. 4, 599-670
[6] M. Hochster and C. Huneke, Applications of the existence of big Cohen-Macaulay algebras, Adv. Math.
113 (1995), no. 1, 45-117.
[7] M. Hochster, Topics in the homological theory of modules over commutative rings, CBMS Regional
Conference Series 24, Amer. Math. Soc., 1975.
[8] M. Hochster, Big Cohen-Macaulay algebras in dimension three via Heitmann’s theorem, J. Algebra
254 (2002), no. 2, 395-408.
[9] Rebecca R.G, Closure operations that induce big Cohen-Macaulay algebras, arXiv: 1512.07862v1.
[10] P. Roberts, A. Singh and V. Srinivas, The annihilator of local cohomology in characteristic zero, Illinois
J. Math. 51 (2007), 237-254.
Dinabandhu Andrews College, Kolkata 700084, India
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Isogeometric shape optimisation of shell structures using multiresolution subdivision
surfaces
Kosala Bandara, Fehmi Cirak∗
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, U.K.
arXiv:1605.06288v1 [math.NA] 20 May 2016
Abstract
We introduce the isogeometric shape optimisation of thin shell structures using subdivision surfaces. Both triangular Loop and
quadrilateral Catmull-Clark subdivision schemes are considered for geometry modelling and finite element analysis. A gradientbased shape optimisation technique is implemented to minimise compliance, i.e. to maximise stiffness. Different control meshes
describing the same surface are used for geometry representation, optimisation and finite element analysis. The finite element
analysis is performed with subdivision basis functions corresponding to a sufficiently fine control mesh. During iterative shape
optimisation the geometry is updated starting from the coarsest control mesh and proceeding to increasingly finer control meshes.
The proposed approach is applied to three optimisation examples, namely a catenary, roof over a rectangular domain and freeform
architectural shell roof. The influence of the geometry description and the used subdivision scheme on the obtained optimised
curved geometries are investigated in detail.
Keywords: shape optimisation, thin shells, isogeometric analysis, subdivision surfaces, finite elements
1. Introduction
Shell structures are curved solids with one dimension significantly smaller than the other two. They are prevalent in
many engineering applications, most prominently in aerospace,
automotive and structural engineering. The load carrying capacity of shells can be greatly increased by systematically optimising their curved shape. Due to their small thickness the
mechanics of shells can be efficiently described with surface
models. The mechanical response of a thin shell depends, according to the Kirchhoff-Love model, on the first and second
fundamental forms of the surface. In shape optimisation of
shells the efficient and flexible description of freeform surfaces
and the finite element discretisation of the governing equations
defined on them are intrinsically linked. In this paper we use the
subdivision surfaces as a common representation for geometric
modelling and finite element discretisation of Kirchhoff-Love
shell equations.
Isogeometric analysis aims to unify geometric modelling
and finite element analysis by using for the latter usual computeraided design (CAD) basis functions, like NURBS. Since its inception by Hughes et al. [1, 2] isogeometric analysis has become immensely popular and has been applied to a wide range
of engineering problems, too many to list here. Prior to the
advent of isogeometric analysis, the integrated geometric modelling and finite element analysis of shells using subdivision
surfaces was proposed in [3]. Specifically, Loop subdivision
surfaces were used for discretising the Kirchhoff-Love shells
and representing their geometry. As an extension of this approach, the treatment of industrially prevalent non-manifold shell
∗ Corresponding
author
Preprint submitted to Elsevier
geometries and the inclusion of out-of-plane shear deformations relevant for thicker shells were proposed in [4] and [5],
respectively. More recently the isogeometric analysis of shells
and beams using NURBS basis functions were introduced in [6,
7]. The use of smooth subdivision and NURBS basis functions
has also the advantage that they have square-integrable curvatures, which is necessary for discretising the Kirchhoff-Love
shell equations depending on curvatures.
In the present work, we investigate the gradient-based shape
optimisation of shell structures using subdivision surfaces for
geometric modelling and finite element analysis. The minimised
cost function is the compliance so that (qualitatively) displacements, strains and stresses are minimised. In a typical industrial design setting both the input to and output from structural
optimisation is a geometry, i.e. a CAD model. During optimisation the cost function and its derivatives with respect to some
geometric design parameters need to be computed with finite
element analysis. Hence, as a matter of fact, the interoperability of geometry and finite element models is crucial. Equally
important are techniques for choosing suitable geometric design variables that can parameterise a sufficiently large set of
geometries. Over the years, a wide variety of shape parameterisation techniques have been proposed that are based either
on the CAD, finite element or an intermediary model [8, 9].
In one group of techniques the geometric design variables are
the parameters of the CAD model or a reconstructed CAD-like
spline model [10–14]. In the second group of techniques the
design variables are the vertex positions of the finite element
mesh [15–17]. Yet in another group of parameterisation techniques, like the ones based on radial basis functions [18] or
free-form deformations [19, 20], the design variables are only
May 23, 2016
(a) Coarse control mesh.
(b) Finite element mesh.
(c) Vertical displacement isocontours.
Figure 1: Shape optimised thin shell roof structure emanating from a flat plate with stiffeners. The structure is loaded with a
uniformly distributed vertical load and is supported at its four corners. The vertex positions of the coarse control mesh (a) represent
the optimisation design variables. The compliance cost function and its derivatives are evaluated with finite element analysis
using the twice subdivided control mesh (b) and the corresponding smooth subdivision basis functions. The limit surface and the
isocontours of the vertical displacement are shown in (c).
in this paper was introduced in [26]. In that exploratory work
Loop subdivision and non-gradient based optimisation algorithms were used. More recently the proposed multiresolution
approach has been applied to other types of optimisation problems, namely electrostatic shape optimisation of high-voltage
devices [27] and shape optimisation of volumetric solids [28].
The electrostatic simulations are performed with the boundary
element method and the solid simulations with a the voxelbased immersed finite element method.
This paper is organised as follows. In Section 2 we begin
with reviewing the Kirchhoff-Love model for thin shells and its
discretisation with subdivision basis functions. We then introduce the compliance optimisation problem and compute with
an adjoint approach the cost function derivatives with respect
to the vertex positions of the subdivision control mesh. Section 3 provides a very brief introduction to subdivision surfaces.
Subsequently, in Section 4 the multiresolution algorithm is introduced. Finally, in Section 5 we introduce three examples of
increasing complexity, namely the shape optimisation of a thinstrip, roof over a rectangular domain and freeform architectural
shell roof.
indirectly linked to the CAD or FEA model. This list of parameterisation techniques is not intended to be complete. The abundance of shape parameterisation techniques is partly due to the
inherent limitations and incompatibilities of conventional CAD
and FEA models in the context of shape optimisation. With
isogeometric analysis using subdivision surfaces most of the incompatibilities between the CAD and FEA representations can
be elegantly circumvented. To this end, the increasing availability of subdivision surfaces in CAD systems, including PTC
Creo, CATIA, Siemens NX or Autodesk Fusion 360, is noteworthy.
In isogeometric shape optimisation with subdivision surfaces different resolutions, i.e. control meshes, of a surface
are employed for optimisation and performing the finite element analysis, see Figure 1. In computer graphics subdivision surfaces are usually viewed as a process for generating
increasingly finer meshes that converge in the limit to a surface [21]. Alternatively, they can be viewed as the generalisation of splines to arbitrary connectivity meshes [22]. In the
proposed optimisation approach, both viewpoints are simultaneously exploited. Subdivision surfaces are best considered
as generalised splines when used as finite element basis functions. On the other hand, the discrete computer graphics viewpoint with the associated data structures and algorithms is best
suited for simultaneously operating on different resolutions in
a memory and time efficient manner. Our present implementation is based on the triangular Loop [23] and quadrilateral
Catmull-Clark schemes [24], or more specifically on their extended versions introduced in [25]. The finite element analysis is performed with basis functions corresponding to a sufficiently fine control mesh. Within the optimisation loop, starting with the coarsest, the vertex positions of increasingly finer
control meshes are used as design variables. The resolution
of the control mesh determines the extent of applied geometry changes, because each vertex has control over the surface
within a two-ring of adjacent elements. An earlier two-level
version of the multiresolution optimisation approach proposed
2. Thin-shells
2.1. Governing equations and discretisation
We consider a thin-shell with the undeformed mid-surface Ω
and the thickness t. The surface Ω is parameterised with the
curvilinear coordinates (θ1 , θ2 ) ∈ 2 providing each material
point on the surface with a unique parametric coordinate. The
position of the material points is denoted with the coordinates
x(θ1 , θ2 ) ∈ 3 .
The standard covariant basis vectors of the mid-surface aα
and the unit normal a3 are given by
aα =
∂x
= x,α ,
∂θα
a3 =
a1 × a2
.
|a1 × a2 |
(1)
The corresponding contravariant base vectors aα are defined
through the relation aα · aβ = δαβ , where δαβ is the Kronecker
2
Figure 2: Solid thin-shell and its mid-surface (right) with the position vector x(θ1 , θ2 ). Parameter space with the coordinates (θ1 , θ2 )
is shown on the left. The covariant base vectors a1 and a2 with the normal a3
where E is the Young’s modulus, ν is the Poisson’s ratio and
H = H αβγδ aα ⊗ aβ ⊗ aγ ⊗ aδ is an auxiliary fourth order tensor
with the contravariant components
delta. Here and in the following the Greek indices take the values {1, 2}, Latin indices the values {1, 2, 3} and the summation
convention is used.
Displacing each material point on the mid-surface with a
displacement vector u(θ1 , θ2 ) ∈ 3 yields a deformed (or, displaced) mid-surface. Subject to few mechanical assumptions,
it can be shown that the differences in the first and second fundamental forms of the original and displaced surface provide
suitable strain measures. The difference in the first fundamental
form is referred to as the membrane strain α and the difference
in the second fundamental form as the bending strain β. In case
of small displacements the linearised membrane strain tensor is
ααβ =
1
aα · u,β + u,α · aβ aα ⊗ aβ
2
1
H αβγδ = ν aαβ aγδ + (1 − ν) (aαγ aβδ + aαδ aβγ )
2
and the contravariant metric aαβ = aα · aβ .
The equilibrium configurations of the shell with prescribed
loading are obtained from minimising (4). Note that for a well
posed problem also the displacements on some parts of the
boundary have to be prescribed in addition to the loading. In a
finite element approximation, the mid-surface position and the
displacement vectors in (4) are approximated with basis functions and their coefficients
X
X
Ni (θ1 , θ2 )ui . (7)
Ni (θ1 , θ2 )xi , u(θ1 , θ2 ) ≈
x(θ1 , θ2 ) ≈
(2)
and the linearised bending strain tensor is
In our implementation, the basis functions Ni (θ1 , θ2 ) are obtained either from triangular Loop subdivision or quadrilateral
Catmull-Clark subdivision. In both schemes there is one basis
function associated with each each vertex of the control mesh.
Hence, the coefficients xi and ui are simply the position and
displacements of a (control) vertex with the index i. Introducing the approximations (7) into the potential (4) yields a discrete minimisation problem for computing the vertex displacements ui .
Next, we consider the potential energy of the displaced shell
Z
Π(u) =
W m (α) + W b (β) |a1 × a2 | d Ω
ZΩ
Z
(4)
−
p· udΩ −
r · u d Γ,
Γ
ui = arg min Π(ui ) ⇒
ui
where the first integral is the internal potential energy consisting of the sum of the internal membrane and bending energy
densities W m and W b , respectively. The remaining two integrals represent the external potential energy resulting from the
prescribed surface load vector p and the edge load vector r. For
an elastic material the two internal energy densities are defined
with
1 Et
α:H:α
2 1 − ν2
1
Et3
W b (β) =
β : H : β,
2 12(1 − ν2 )
i
i
1
β = −u,αβ · a3 + √ [u,1 ·(aα,β × a2 ) + u,2 ·(a1 × aα,β )]
a
(3)
!
a3 · aα,β
+
[u,1 ·(a2 × a3 ) + u,2 ·(a3 × a1 )] aα ⊗ aβ .
|a1 × a2 |
Ω
(6)
∂Π(ui )
=0
∂ui
(8)
In order to compute the stationary points of Π(ui ) domain integrals are numerically evaluated in a usual finite element fashion
by iterating over the elements/faces in the control mesh. To
this end, we use Gauss integration with 3 points for Loop and 4
points for Catmull-Clark subdivision. The basis function values
at the Gauss points are evaluated with the simplified version of
the algorithm proposed by Stam [29, 30], see [3, 4]. Specifically, since the Gauss points are relatively far from extraordinary vertices there are no efficiency gains from the eigendecomposition considered in [29, 30]. After numerical integration the
W m (α) =
(5)
3
stationarity condition for the minimisation problem (8) yields a
discrete system of equations
∂Π(ui )
= 0 ⇒ Ku = f,
∂ui
Hence, in gradient-based shape optimisation the vertex coordinates have to be perturbed in the direction
v = −2uT
(9)
2.2. Shape gradients
In shape optimisation we consider a shell structure with prescribed loading and displacement boundary conditions and aim
to find its mid-surface such that a user chosen cost function
(10)
x
is minimised. As a constraint the array of the vertex displacements u has to satisfy the equilibrium equations (9). In practice, there are additional constraints, for instance pertaining to
the surface area of the shell or the position of selected vertices,
which will be omitted in this section. Moreover, in all examples presented in this paper the cost function is the compliance
of the structure
J(x, u) = uT f = uT Ku .
3. Subdivision surfaces
In the isogeometric analysis context it is expedient to consider subdivision surfaces as the generalisation splines to arbitrary connectivity meshes. As known, refinable basis functions
allow to represent the same spline surface with control meshes
of different resolutions. Loop subdivision [23] is the generalisation of quartic box-splines to arbitrary connectivity triangular
meshes and Catmull-Clark [24] subdivision is the generalisation of tensor-product cubic b-splines to arbitrary connectivity
quadrilateral meshes. Both schemes lead to basis functions that
are refinable.
The control meshes are refined by quadrisection of elements.
In triangular Loop subdivision this is achieved by introducing a
new vertex on each edge. In Catmull-Clark in addition to new
vertices on the edges a new vertex at the centre of each element
is created. The control vertex coordinates of a refined mesh at
level `+1 are obtained from the vertex coordinates of the coarse
mesh at level ` according to
(11)
Informally, minimising the compliance leads to stiffer shell structures with smaller displacements u. The subsequent derivations
carry over to other cost functions, see e.g. [31].
In order to use a gradient-based optimisation algorithm for
minimising J(x, u) the derivatives of the cost function with respect to the vertex coordinates, also refereed to as shape gradients or design sensitivities, are needed. To this end, we consider
the adjoint formulation with
L(x, u, λ) = uT Ku + λT [f − Ku],
(12)
where λ is an array of Lagrange parameters. The stationarity
condition for L(x, u, λ) with respect to the vertex displacements
leads to the adjoint problem
∂L(x, u, λ)
=0
∂u
⇒
Kλ = 2Ku
⇒
(16)
to achieve a decrease in the cost function. In order to compute v
the derivatives of the load vector and stiffness matrix with respect to the vertex coordinates are needed. For the considered
Kirchhoff-Love shell formulation it is straightforward to compute these derivatives by systematic element-by-element differentiation of the discrete equilibrium equations (9). Note that
other shell formulations, especially ones available in commercial software, contain as degrees of freedom in addition to vertex positions also the rotations of vertex director vectors. This
usually makes the computation of the related the shape gradients more complex.
where K is the symmetric, positive-definite stiffness matrix, u
is the array of vertex displacements containing all ui and f is the
array of vertex forces.
min J(x, u)
∂f
∂K
+ uT u .
∂x
∂x
x`+1 = Sx` .
(17)
For vertices located in the regular regions of a mesh the subdivision matrix S contains the standard knot insertion weights.
The matrix components associated to the vertices in the irregular regions are given by the specific subdivision scheme. The
successive subdivision refinement of a control mesh can be interpreted as the chain of linear mappings
λ = 2u . (13)
Here, we made use of the symmetry of the stiffness matrix K.
The equality between the Lagrange parameters λ and displacements u (up to the constant 2) is only valid when the compliance cost functions is considered. The stationarity condition
for L(x, u, λ) with respect to the vertex coordinates leads to the
discrete shape gradients
"
#
∂L(x, u, λ)
∂K
T ∂K
T ∂f
=u
u + 2u
−
u
(14)
∂x
∂x
∂x ∂x
∂f
∂K
= 2uT
− uT u .
(15)
∂x
∂x
x0
S
x1
S
x2
S
···
S
x`−1
S
x`
. (18)
The size of the vertex coordinate x` increases with increasing `
and the size of the subdivision matrix S increases accordingly.
All control meshes converge irrespective of their level ` to the
same surface. The algorithm proposed by Stam [29, 30] provides a spline based parameterisation of subdivision surfaces
so that the properties of arbitrary surface points can be evaluated, cf (7). There are also alternative parameterisations available, see [32, 33].
At equilibrium, that is when Ku − f = 0 is exactly satisfied,
the gradients of the Lagrangian L(x, u, λ) and the cost function J(x, u) with respect to the vertex coordinates are identical.
4
Algorithm 1 Multiresolution shape optimisation
In shape optimisation the coarsening of the refined subdivision control meshes is also needed, that is,
x` = Rx`+1
with R = (ST S)−1 ST ,
// read maximum optimisation level `o,max
// read finite element analysis level `c
// read input coarse control mesh x0
// initialise optimisation level
(19)
where the coarsening matrix R is defined as the pseudo-inverse
of the subdivision matrix S. The span of geometries that can be
represented with x`+1 are larger than the one with x` , hence the
specific form of R is a choice. Similar to subdivision refinement
the coarsening matrix can be successively applied in order to
obtain coarser representations of the geometry, i.e.,
x0
R
x1
R
x2
R
···
R
x`−1
R
x`
1:
`o = 0
// initialise cost function
2:
J=∞
// iterate over optimisation levels
3:
while `o ≤ `o,max do
// update vertex coordinates x`o while cost function decreases
4:
repeat
// subdivide optimisation level `o up to analysis level `c
. (20)
5:
6:
Note that, by definition (19), one step of subdivision refinement
followed by one step of coarsening does not change the vertex
coordinates, or RS = I.
for ` ← `o to `c do
x` ← Sx`
// compute cost function J = J(x`c , u`c ) and its gradient v`c
// project gradient to optimisation level
7:
8:
for ` ← `c to `o do
v` ← Rv`
// update vertex coordinates of the optimisation level
4. Shape optimisation
9:
10:
The subdivision surfaces enable us to use different resolutions of the same geometry for optimisation and analysis. Crucially, in the spirit of isogeometric analysis the control meshes
for analysis and optimisation represent the same surface. A
simplified two-level version of the proposed iterative gradientbased optimisation algorithm is shown Algorithm 1. The optimisation and analysis meshes correspond to different refinement levels in a subdivision hierarchy. The optimisation level
is `o = 0 and the analysis level is `c = n, where n is user prescribed. The gradient of the compliance cost function v`c is
computed with a finite element analysis using basis functions
of the control mesh at level `c , see Section 2. Subsequently,
through successive multiplication of the gradient with the coarsening matrix R the optimisation level gradient v`o is obtained.
As indicated in Algorithm 1 the updated coordinates x`o of the
optimisation level can be, for instance, obtained with a simple
steepest descent method. Instead of this simple update algorithm, we use in the presented examples the MMA optimisation algorithm in the NLopt library [34]. The MMA algorithm
usually requires fewer iterations to converge and is able to consider both equality and inequality side constraints. Moreover,
in the presented examples the optimisation level is successively
increased every time a stationary point is reached until a user
prescribed maximum optimisation level is reached. It is evident
that `o ≤ `c .
x`o ← (x`o − αv`o )
with α ≥ 0
until (Jprevious − J) < tolerance
// increment optimisation level
11:
`o ← (`o + 1)
5. Examples
Three examples are presented to demonstrate the functioning of the proposed isogeometric shape optimisation of thinshell structures using subdivision. In all examples the objective
is to minimise the compliance. As subdivision schemes triangular Loop and quadrilateral Catmull-Clark scheme are used.
In order to preserve corners and edges of the original geometry, at vertices and edges on the boundary modified subdivision
stencils are applied [4, 25].
5.1. Thin strip
In this verification example, a thin strip pinned at both ends
and subjected to a vertical distributed load is optimised, see Figure 3. Initially, the strip is a narrow flat plate with length 1
equal to the distance between the supports. The magnitude of
the vertical uniformly distributed load is 1000. The width of
the strip is 0.05; the thickness is 0.02; the Young’s modulus
is E = 2 × 108 ; and the Poisson’s ratio is ν = 0.3.
The Catmull-Clark subdivision scheme is used for representing the geometry and finite element analysis. The initial
coarse mesh used for optimisation contains only 3 elements
along the length and 1 element across the width of the strip.
This increases to 48 in the twice subdivided analysis fine mesh,
i.e. `c ≡ 2. During compliance optimisation the mesh resolution is increased starting from `o = 0 up to `o = 2. Only the
out-of-plane position of the control points in the direction of the
load vector are optimised. The length of the optimised strip is
prescribed to be either 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3.
5
(a) Initial geometry.
(a) Prescribed length = 1.1.
(b) Optimised geometry.
Figure 3: Optimisation of an uniformly loaded thin strip.
As known from classical mechanics, the shape of the curve
assumed by a loose string pinned at both ends is a catenary
curve [35], which is for the considered geometry of the form
y = c1 · cosh (x/c1 ) + c2 ,
(b) Prescribed length = 1.2.
(21)
where the y-axis is parallel to the applied load vector and the left
and right supports have the coordinates (−0.5, 0) and (0.5, 0),
respectively. The constants c1 and c2 depend on the chosen
length of the optimised strip. The comparison of the optimisation results with the corresponding catenary curves is shown
in Figure 4. The reduction of the cost compliance function is
more than 99.9% and the optimisation results show good visual agreement with the catenary curve. The slight deviation
from the catenary is possibly due to the finite width of the strip,
which leads during optimisation to some curvature generation
across the width of the shell (visible in Figure 3b).
(c) Prescribed length = 1.3.
Figure 4: Optimisation of a thin strip with different prescribed
lengths. The blue lines show the centre line of the strip before
and after optimisation and the dotted black line is the catenary
curve.
5.2. Shell roof over a rectangular domain
Our second example is adapted from Bletzinger and Ramm [11]
and considers the compliance optimisation of a roof over a rectangular domain, see Figure 5. The roof has the plan of 6×12 and
is pinned along its two long edges. The applied loading consists of a uniformly distributed vertical load of 5000. The shell
thickness is t = 0.05; the Young’s modulus is E = 3 × 1010 ; and
the Poisson’s ratio is ν = 0.2. As indicated in Figure 5, Bletzinger and Ramm used only the two height parameters s1 and s2
to optimise the roof geometry while maintaining a bi-parabolic
shape. Moreover, they chose a cylindrical shell as their initial
shape prior to optimisation.
6
Figure 6: Roof over a rectangular domain with four different coarse control meshes. Each column shows the coarse control mesh,
the obtained optimised geometry and the corresponding cost function value.
In the performed computations a flat rectangle with four
different control mesh layouts is used as the initial geometry,
see Figure 6. The aim of choosing the different initial meshes
is to highlight the mesh dependence of the optimised shape.
With a gradient-based algorithm a certain mesh dependence of
the optimisation results is unavoidable because most structural
optimisation problems are non-convex. In the computed four
different cases, during optimisation only the out-of-plane position of vertices are modified with an prescribed upper bound
of 6 in order to reproduce the effect of limiting the maximum
height s1 ≤ 6 in [11]. In all cases the analysis level is chosen
with `c ≡ 2. The optimisation level starts with `o = 0 and is incremented each time the cost function reaches a steady state as
long as `o ≤ `c ≡ 2. In Figure 6 the optimised geometries and
the corresponding cost function values are shown. The given
cost function values are obtained using a fine computational
mesh, which has a comparable resolution in all four cases. For
comparison, the cost function of the initial flat rectangular plate
is ≈ 46 × 104 . In all four cases a large reduction in the cost
function is achieved and there are significant differences in the
final geometries. Only starting off with very few optimisation
variables in the initial coarse mesh, like in A and B, appears
to give the lowest minima. Note also the resemblance of the
optimised geometries for meshes A and B to the result given
in [11] shown in Figure 5b. The results for meshes A and B
have lower cost function values possibly due to the presence of
the fine scale ripples on the optimised geometries that can be
seen Figure 6, first and second columns.
The choice of the optimisation and computational levels `o
and `c is studied next, see Figure 7. In one set of computations,
referred to as single resolution optimisation, the two levels are
chosen to be the same `o ≡ `c . This means the optimisation
variables are simply the out-of-plane positions of the vertices
of the computational mesh. In a second set of computations, referred to as multiresolution optimisation, the optimisation level
always starts with `o = 0 and is successively incremented as
long as `o ≤ `c , as discussed in the preceding paragraph. The
(a) Initial geometry (J(x, u) = 2108).
(b) Optimised geometry (J(x, u) = 149.68)
Figure 5: Roof over a rectangular domain. Initial and optimised
geometries from Bletzinger and Ramm [11]. The given compliance cost functions values are computed with the introduced
thin-shell solver.
7
obtained cost functions for the two different optimisation strategies and for `c ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} are plotted in Figure 7. In the cost
function plot each point represents one independent optimisation problem. For all problems the initial control mesh is the
quadrilateral mesh A shown in Figure 6. Note that as expected
the result for the multiresolution optimisation for large `c ≥ 2
is the same as in Figure 6, first column. In contrast, for single
level optimisation the obtained geometries become highly oscillatory when the level `o ≡ `c is increased. In Figure 7 all the
given cost functions are obtained using a fine control mesh with
the same resolution for all data points.
Design A
Design B
Design C
Labels of the fixed vertices
square, filled diamond
square, filled diamond, empty diamond
square
Table 1: Three design scenarios for the architectural shell roof.
The labels refer to the vertices in Figure 9 whose coordinates
are fixed during optimisation.
where A0 is the area of the original surface. The initial value of
the compliance cost function is 31.36. Design C results in the
most efficient optimised shape with a 79.13% reduction in cost,
followed by Design A with a reduction of 38.88%. The total reduction in the most constrained Design B is only 23.97%. The
corresponding optimised shapes for each design scenario are
shown in Figures 10, 11 and 12. As can be seen in these figures
the optimised Design C has more variation in the surface curvature, which usually leads to stiffer and less compliant structures.
This variation of the curvature is especially pronounced in the
large overhanging front part of the shell structure. Note also
that on all surfaces the characteristic ridge feature and the sharp
corners at both ends of the shell are preserved due to the use of
extended subdivision schemes.
5.3. Freeform architectural shell roof
In design practice, such as in architectural engineering, in
addition to structural efficiency there are a number of equally
important, often not explicitly quantifiable, design objectives.
Although there is a dearth of research on the use of optimisation in a professional design setting, a recent study shows that
designers usually use optimisation for generating ideas, that is
to discover new and unexpected geometries, and do not see it
as a means for generating the ultimate design [36]. Within this
context, isogeometric shape optimisation can aid the systematic
search for structurally efficient geometries.
To illustrate the use of multiresolution optimisation in a
more realistic design setting we consider the roof structure shown
in Figure 8. The approximate dimensions of the shell structure
are 2.31 × 6.27 × 0.75. It is supported only at three points and
contains at the top an opening for lighting purposes and a crease
(G0 -continuous feature line). The applied loading consists of a
uniformly distributed load of −1000 (downwards). The shell
thickness is t = 0.02; the Young’s modulus is E = 1010 ; and the
Poisson’s ratio is ν = 0.2. The triangular control mesh with 26
vertices is depicted in Figure 9. On the control mesh some
of the vertices are tagged as corner vertices (empty squares)
and some of the edges as crease edges (thick lines). At tagged
vertices and edges locally modified stencils are applied during
subdivision refinement, see [4, 25] for details. These stencils
ensure that sharp corners and G0 -continuous feature lines are
preserved. The visual effect of the tagging on the limit surface
in Figure 8 is evident. Moreover, the tags have an influence
on the entries in the subdivision matrix S and the coarsening
matrix R defined in Section 3 and the basis functions Ni (θ1 , θ2 )
defined in Section 2.1.
For shape optimisation three different design scenarios, referred to as Design A, Design B and Design C, are considered,
see Table 1. Depending on the design scenario the positions
of some of the highlighted vertices in Figure 9 are fixed during
the optimisation iterations. The coarsest control mesh shown in
Figure 9 for optimisation contains 26 vertices and the twice subdivided finite element mesh with `c = 2 contains 272 vertices.
The design variables in optimisation are the out-of-plane plane
positions of the vertices. This choice ensures that the planform
of the roof shell is preserved. Only the positions of vertices in
levels `o = 0 and `o = 1 are optimised, in turn. The optimisation of the vertex positions in the second level results in surfaces
with fine-scale oscillations and has been omitted. It is also necessary to restrict the surface area of the shell to A ≤ 1.2A0 ,
5.4. Conclusions
We introduced the isogeometric shape optimisation of shell
structures using triangular Loop and quadrilateral Catmull-Clark
subdivision surfaces as a common representation for geometric modelling and finite element analysis. The presented examples demonstrate that efficient and flexible representation of
freeform shell geometries is essential for shape optimisation. In
the implemented gradient-based shape optimisation approach
more optimal geometries are obtained when, starting from the
coarsest control mesh, the vertices of increasingly finer control
meshes are chosen as geometric design variables. Irrespective
of the control mesh resolution for optimisation a sufficiently
fine control mesh can always be used for finite element discretisation. In general the finite element control meshes have
to be finer than the optimisation control meshes for accuracy
reasons. The introduced approach effectively allows the designer to choose an optimal geometry with a visually pleasing
and technically feasible smallest feature size. With the increasing availability of subdivision surfaces in CAD systems it is
expected that it will become feasible to import the optimised
geometries back into a CAD environment for continuing with
the design process.
The presented isogeometric shape optimisation approach can
be extended and improved in several ways. First, we considered
only the structural compliance as a cost function and that for
only one loading case. In practice, there are many more load
cases and competing cost functions which have to be taken into
account. For instance, the structural stability, i.e. buckling,
of optimised thin shells is often critical and has to be taken
into account [37]. Moreover, the geometric fidelity of the surfaces in the presented approach can be improved using more
8
Figure 7: Comparison of single and multiresolution optimisation for a roof over a rectangular domain. The coarse control mesh in all
cases is the quadrilateral mesh A shown in Figure 6. The dashed red line indicates single resolution optimisation with `o ≡ `c . The
dotted blue line indicates multiresolution optimisation, which starts with optimisation level `o = 0 and increments it while `o ≤ `c .
Each data point in the plot denotes the final cost on an independent optimisation study. Inset pictures are the optimised shapes at
the indicated data points.
(b) Front view.
(a) Perspective view.
(c) Back view.
Figure 8: Freeform architectural roof supported at three points and containing a central opening and a creased ridge (with G0
continuity). The corresponding coarse resolution control mesh is shown in Figure 9.
9
(b) Front view.
(a) Top view.
(c) Back view.
Figure 9: Triangular coarse control mesh with vertex and edge tags. The black square vertices indicate corner tags and the thick
black edges indicate crease tags. The effect of the tagging on the limit surface can be observed in Figure 8. During the considered
three optimisation design case studies (Design A, Design B and Design C) some of the vertex coordinates are fixed as specified in
Table 1.
(b) Front view
(a) Perspective view.
(c) Back view
Figure 10: Limit surface of the optimised architectural roof Design A. The final value of the compliance is 19.17 representing
a 38.88% reduction.
(b) Front view.
(a) Perspective view.
(c) Back view.
Figure 11: Limit surface of the optimised roof Design B. The final value of the compliance is 23.84 representing a 23.97% reduction.
10
(b) Front view.
(c) Back view.
(a) Perspective view.
Figure 12: Limit surface of the optimised roof Design C. The final value of the objective function is 6.55 representing a 79.13%
reduction.
recent higher-degree subdivision surfaces, such as the NURBScompatible subdivision surfaces [38], or adaptively refined subdivision surfaces [39, 40]. Finally, the multiresolution editing
techniques from computer graphics based on wavelet-like decomposition of surfaces can be employed for interlacing geometry generation by the user with automated structural optimisation [28].
[14]
[15]
[16]
References
[17]
[1] T. J. R. Hughes, J. A. Cottrell, Y. Bazilevs, Isogeometric analysis: CAD,
finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement, Computer
Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 194 (2005) 4135–4195.
[2] J. A. Cottrell, T. J. R. Hughes, Y. Bazilevs, Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2009.
[3] F. Cirak, M. Ortiz, P. Schröder, Subdivision surfaces: A new paradigm
for thin-shell finite-element analysis, International Journal for Numerical
Methods in Engineering 47 (2000) 2039–2072.
[4] F. Cirak, Q. Long, Subdivision shells with exact boundary control and
non-manifold geometry, International Journal for Numerical Methods in
Engineering 88 (2011) 897–923.
[5] Q. Long, P. B. Bornemann, F. Cirak, Shear-flexible subdivision shells,
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 90 (2012)
1549–1577.
[6] J. Kiendl, K.-U. Bletzinger, J. Linhard, W. R., Isogeometric shell analysis
with Kirchhoff-Love elements, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics
and Engineering 198 (2009) 3902–3914.
[7] A. P. Nagy, M. M. Abdalla, Z. Gürdal, Isogeometric sizing and shape optimisation of beam structures, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics
and Engineering 199 (2010) 1216–1230.
[8] R. T. Haftka, R. V. Grandhi, Structural shape optimization — a survey,
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 57 (1986) 91–
106.
[9] J. A. Samareh, Survey of shape parameterization techniques for highfidelity multidisciplinary shape optimization, AIAA journal 39 (2001)
877–884.
[10] V. Braibant, C. Fleury, Shape optimal design using b-splines, Computer
Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 44 (1984) 247–267.
[11] K.-U. Bletzinger, E. Ramm, Form finding of shells by structural optimization, Engineering with Computers 9 (1993) 27–35.
[12] E. Cervera, J. Trevelyan, Evolutionary structural optimisation based on
boundary representation of NURBS. Part I: 2D algorithms, Computers &
Structures 83 (2005) 1902–1916.
[13] T. T. Robinson, C. G. Armstrong, H. S. Chua, C. Othmer, T. Grahs, Optimizing parameterized CAD geometries using sensitivities based on ad-
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
11
joint functions, Computer-Aided Design and Applications 9 (2012) 253–
268.
X. Han, D. W. Zingg, An adaptive geometry parametrization for aerodynamic shape optimization, Optimization and Engineering 15 (2014) 69–
91.
C. Le, T. Bruns, D. Tortorelli, A gradient-based, parameter-free approach
to shape optimization, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 200 (2011) 985–996.
M. Firl, R. Wüchner, K.-U. Bletzinger, Regularization of shape optimization problems using FE-based parametrization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 47 (2013) 507–521.
K.-U. Bletzinger, A consistent frame for sensitivity filtering and the vertex assigned morphing of optimal shape, Structural and Multidisciplinary
Optimization 49 (2014) 873–895.
S. Jakobsson, O. Amoignon, Mesh deformation using radial basis functions for gradient-based aerodynamic shape optimization, Computers &
Fluids 36 (2007) 1119–1136.
M. H. Imam, Three-dimensional shape optimization, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 18 (1982) 661–673.
T. W. Sederberg, S. R. Parry, Free-form deformation of solid geometric
models, SIGGRAPH 1986 Conference Proceedings 20 (1986) 151–160.
D. Zorin, P. Schröder, Subdivision for Modeling and Animation, SIGGRAPH 2000 Course Notes, 2000.
J. Peters, U. Reif, Subdivision Surfaces, Springer Series in Geometry and
Computing, Springer, 2008.
C. T. Loop, Smooth Subdivision Surfaces Based on Triangles, Master’s
thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 1987.
E. Catmull, J. Clark, Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary
topological meshes, Computer-Aided Design 10 (1978) 350–355.
H. Biermann, A. Levin, D. Zorin, Piecewise Smooth Subdivision Surfaces with Normal Control, in: SIGGRAPH 2000 Conference Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, 113–120, 2000.
F. Cirak, M. J. Scott, E. K. Antonsson, M. Ortiz, P. Schröder, Integrated
modeling, finite-element analysis, and engineering design for thin-shell
structures using subdivision, Computer-Aided Design 34 (2002) 137–
148.
K. Bandara, F. Cirak, G. Of, O. Steinbach, J. Zapletal, Boundary element based multiresolution shape optimisation in electrostatics, Journal
of Computational Physics 297 (2015) 584–598.
K. Bandara, T. Rüberg, F. Cirak, Shape optimisation with multiresolution
subdivision surfaces and immersed finite elements, Computer Methods in
Applied Mechanics and Engineering 300 (2016) 510–539.
J. Stam, Exact evaluation of Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces at arbitrary parameter values, in: SIGGRAPH 1998 Conference Proceedings,
Orlando, FL, 395–404, 1998.
J. Stam, Evaluation of Loop subdivision surfaces, in: SIGGRAPH 1999
Course Notes, Los Angeles, CA, 1999.
E. J. Haug, K. K. Choi, V. Komkov, Design Sensitivity Analysis of Struc-
tural Systems, Academic Press, 1986.
[32] I. Boier-Martin, D. Zorin, Differentiable parameterization of CatmullClark subdivision surfaces, in: Eurographics 2004 Conference Proceedings, ACM, 155–164, 2004.
[33] M. Antonelli, C. V. Beccari, G. Casciola, R. Ciarloni, S. Morigi, Subdivision surfaces integrated in a CAD system, Computer-Aided Design 45
(2013) 1294–1305.
[34] S. G. Johnson, The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package, http://abinitio.mit.edu/nlopt.
[35] E. H. Lockwood, A book of curves, Cambridge University Press, 1961.
[36] E. Bradner, F. Iorio, M. Davis, Parameters tell the design story: ideation
and abstraction in design optimization, in: Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design, 26, Society for
Computer Simulation International, 2014.
[37] R. Reitinger, E. Ramm, Buckling and imperfection sensitivity in the optimization of shell structures, Thin-walled structures 23 (1995) 159–177.
[38] T. J. Cashman, U. H. Augsdörfer, N. A. Dodgson, M. A. Sabin, NURBS
with extraordinary points: high-degree, non-uniform, rational subdivision
schemes, in: SIGGRAPH 2009 Conference Proceedings, New Orleans,
LA, 46:1–46:9, 2009.
[39] X. Wei, Y. Zhang, T. J. R. Hughes, M. A. Scott, Truncated hierarchical
Catmull–Clark subdivision with local refinement, Computer Methods in
Applied Mechanics and Engineering 291 (2015) 1–20.
[40] P. B. Bornemann, F. Cirak, A subdivision-based implementation of the hierarchical b-spline finite element method, Computer Methods in Applied
Mechanics and Engineering 253 (2013) 584–598.
12
| 5cs.CE
|
AN ALGORITHM FOR CANONICAL FORMS OF FINITE
SUBSETS OF Zd UP TO AFFINITIES
arXiv:1408.3310v3 [cs.DS] 8 Feb 2016
GIOVANNI PAOLINI
Abstract. In this paper we describe an algorithm for the computation of
canonical forms of finite subsets of Zd , up to affinities over Z. For fixed dimension d, this algorithm has worst-case asymptotic complexity O(n log2 n s µ(s)),
where n is the number of points in the given subset, s is an upper bound to the
size of the binary representation of any of the n points, and µ(s) is an upper
bound to the number of operations required to multiply two s-bit numbers.
This problem arises e.g. in the context of computation of invariants of
finitely presented groups with abelianized group isomorphic to Zd . In that
context one needs to decide whether two Laurent polynomials in d indeterminates, considered as elements of the group ring over the abelianized group, are
equivalent with respect to a change of base.
1. Introduction
The problem we are going to study is that of algorithmically determining whether
two configurations of points in the d-dimensional integral lattice can be obtained,
one from the other, through an affine automorphism of Zd . Such affine automorphism need not preserve the order in which the elements of the two sets are specified.
If we required instead the order to be preserved, the problem could be more easily
solved using the Hermite normal form (see Section 3).
For instance, the second set of points in Figure 1 can be obtained from the first
one by applying the affinity
−1 −1
13
x 7→
x+
.
0
1
0
x2
x2
x1
x1
Figure 1. Example of two equivalent sets for d = 2.
1
2
GIOVANNI PAOLINI
Instead of trying to directly find if two given sets of points are equivalent (i.e. if
there is an affinity that maps one onto the other), we will describe a procedure to
compute a “canonical form” of a set. Then, to check the equivalence of two sets, it
will suffice to check the equality of their canonical forms.
Different possible approaches to this problem were tried by the author, before
coming to the one described in this paper. For instance one can exploit geometric
and/or combinatorial constructions, such as the convex hull, which is equivariant
under the action of the affine group. In dimension d ≤ 3, a fast algorithm (linear
up to a logarithmic factor) based on the computation of the convex hull was indeed
found, but was not published. Another approach could be to define the canonical
form of a set as an element of the orbit which minimizes some quantity (such as the
k · k1 norm or the k · k∞ norm), but we couldn’t find a reasonably fast algorithm
to do this. The approach presented here is completely different, and is based on
arithmetic properties of the integral lattice. Its advantages are the almost linear
asymptotic complexity (in terms of the size of the set), the generality (it works for
any dimension d, despite the running time strongly depends on it) and a simple
implementation.
One situation in which this problem arises is in the context of isomorphism
between finitely presented torsion-free groups, and particularly in the case of fundamental groups of topological spaces. Let G be a finitely presented group with
abelianized group H isomorphic to Zd , and let ψ : H → Zd be an isomorphism. In
[3] it is shown how to construct, from G and ψ, a Laurent polynomial ∆(t1 , . . . , td ),
called Alexander polynomial, which is defined up to a factor ±tλ1 1 · · · tλd d (λi ∈ Z).
This polynomial depends on the chosen isomorphism ψ between the abelianized
group and Zd (in other words, it depends on the choice of a base for H). In order
to obtain an invariant of G (up to group isomorphisms), one should determine a
canonical form for the Alexander polynomial up to change of base for H. It turns out
(see [1]) that a change of base, given by a linear automorphism A of Zd , affects every
md
1
monomial αtm
by transforming the exponents vector (m1 , . . . , md )t with A.
1 · · · td
Since the Alexander polynomial is itself determined up to a factor ±tλ1 1 · · · tλd d , an
invariant of G is given by the Alexander polynomial up to the action of the group
of affine automorphisms of Zd (and a possible change of sign). The determination
of a canonical form for such action is therefore related to the problem we are going
to discuss.
In Section 2, we will formally state the problem we are going to solve, and we will
introduce some notation. Throughout Sections 3-5 we will describe the algorithm,
prove its correctness and analyze its complexity. In Section 6, we illustrate how
to modify the algorithm in order to compute a canonical form of the Alexander
polynomial. Section 7 provides a final discussion with some concluding remarks.
2. Preliminaries and notations
Let d be a fixed positive integer. Let GL(d, Z) be the group of linear automorphisms of Zd over Z, i.e. the group of d × d matrices with entries in Z and
determinant ±1. Moreover, let Aff(d, Z) be the group of affinities of Zd . The group
Aff(d, Z) can be regarded as a subgroup of GL(d + 1, Z): the affinity x 7→ Ax + b,
with A ∈ GL(d, Z) and b ∈ Zd , is represented by the block matrix
A b
.
0 1
CANONICAL FORM OF FINITE SUBSETS OF Zd
3
Let Xd be the set of all finite subsets Λ of Zd . The natural action of Aff(d, Z)
on Zd induces an action of Aff(d, Z) on Xd : explicitly, if ϕ ∈ Aff(d, Z) and Λ =
{p1 , p2 , . . . , pn } ⊆ Zd , the action is given by
ϕ({p1 , p2 , . . . pn }) = {ϕ(p1 ), ϕ(p2 ), . . . ϕ(pn )}.
Our purpose is to describe a canonical form for elements of Xd up to the action
of Aff(d, Z), and an algorithm for the computation of such a canonical form. For
any fixed dimension d, our algorithm will have worst-case asymptotic complexity
O(n log2 n s µ(s)). Here, n is the size of the given subset Λ of Zd (as above) and
s is an upper bound on the size of the binary representation of any coordinate of
any point of Λ. Since d is fixed, s is also (up to a constant) an upper bound to
the size of the binary representation of any point of Λ. With µ(s) we indicate an
upper bound to the cost of multiplying two s-bit integers; for instance, using the
Schönhage-Strassen algorithm [7] we would have µ(s) = s log s log log s.
Since the concept of “canonical form” plays a key role in this work, we will give
the following formal definition.
Definition 2.1. Let S be a set, and G be a group acting on S. A canonical form
for S with respect to the action of G is a function f : S → S satisfying the following
two conditions:
(1) f (x) ∈ Orb(x) for all x ∈ S (here we denote by Orb(x) the orbit of x);
(2) f (gx) = f (x) for all x ∈ S and g ∈ G.
We also say that f : S → S is a weak canonical form if it satisfies condition (2) but
doesn’t necessarily satisfy condition (1).
The second condition simply says that f is constant over any orbit, so f picks
a “canonical representative” from each orbit. Having a computable canonical form
allows to test whether two elements x, y ∈ S belong to the same orbit: this happens
if and only if f (x) = f (y).
We now give a few more definitions which will be useful later.
Definition 2.2. A frame is an ordered set of affinely independent points of Qd .
Given a set Λ ⊆ Zd , a Λ-frame is a frame included in Λ. A frame Q is Λ-covering
if Λ ⊆ Span(Q). A Λ-frame which is also Λ-covering is shortly called a complete
Λ-frame.
By “Span”, we always mean the affinely generated subspace over the field of the
rational numbers (not over Z). Also the expression “affinely independent” is always
to be intended over Q, not over Z. Notice that a Λ-covering frame is not necessarily
a Λ-frame.
We denote by F (Λ) the set of all the Λ-frames, and by Fc (Λ) ⊆ F(Λ) the set of
all the complete Λ-frames.
Let Yd be the set of the pairs (Λ, Q), with Λ ∈ Xd and Q a Λ-covering frame.
Roughly speaking, an element of Yd is a finite subset of Zd together with an affine
coordinate system. In order to find a canonical form for elements Λ ∈ Xd , we will
first do it for elements (Λ, Q) ∈ Yd , and then we will describe a canonical way to
choose a frame Q for each set Λ.
3. Canonical form, given a frame
In this section, we want to describe an algorithm that, given a pair (Λ, Q) ∈ Yd ,
returns a pair (Ω, U ) = f (Λ, Q) which has the following properties:
4
GIOVANNI PAOLINI
(1) Ω is a finite subset of Zd in the same orbit of Λ with respect to the action
of Aff(d, Z);
(2) U is a complete Ω-frame;
(3) f is a weak canonical form for Yd in the sense of Definition 2.1, i.e.
f ϕ(Λ), ϕ(Q) = f (Λ, Q) ∀ ϕ ∈ Aff(d, Z).
Notice that f is not required to be a canonical form (the frame U is not necessarily
the image of the frame Q under some affinity; in general, they don’t even have the
same size).
In what follows we are going to use the Hermite normal form (see for instance
[2] and [6]), shortened “HNF”. Briefly, the Hermite normal form of an integer d × n
matrix is a canonical form up to left-multiplication by elements of GL(d, Z) (but
this is not the only property of the HNF we will use).
The following is the pseudocode of the algorithm, which will be subsequently
described in words.
Algorithm 3.1 (Canonical form, given a frame). This algorithm takes in input a
pair (Λ, Q) ∈ Yd and outputs a pair (Ω, U ) with the properties described above.
1: function CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, Q)
2:
T ← Q ∩ Λ as a list, with the ordering induced by Q
3:
k ← dim Span(Λ)
4:
while |T | < k + 1 do
5:
p ← the point of Λ \ Span(T ) such that its coordinates with respect to
6:
the frame Q are lexicographically minimal
7:
T ← T ∪ {p}
8:
end while
9:
{p0 , . . . , pk } ← T
10:
M ← d × k matrix with columns p1 − p0 , . . . , pk − p0
11:
A ← any element of GL(d, Z) such that AM = HNF(M )
12:
ψ ← affinity definedby x 7→ A(x − p0 )
13:
return ψ(Λ), ψ(T )
14: end function
Let us describe briefly the steps of Algorithm 3.1. On line 2, we initialize a new
frame T (which is actually a Λ-frame), extracting from Q the elements that also
belong to Λ. T is given the ordering induced as a subset of Q. Then, on lines 4-8,
we complete T to a Λ-covering frame using points of Λ (thus T becomes a complete
Λ-frame). This is done adding a point of Λ at a time, each time choosing the point
that minimizes the coordinates vector with respect to the frame Q (the coordinates
vectors are compared lexicographically). Then, if p0 , . . . , pk are the elements of T ,
on line 10 we define the matrix M as
M = p1 − p0 . . . pk − p0 .
On line 11, we define A as any d × d matrix such that the left multiplication by
A sends M to its Hermite normal form (the standard algorithms to compute the
HNF also compute such an A). Finally, we define ψ as the affinity x 7→ A(x − p0 ),
which is the affinity that maps p0 to the origin and each pi (i = 1, . . . , k) to the i-th
column of HNF(M ). The affinity ψ is used to transform the pair (Λ, T ) into the
pair which is then returned. Properties (1) and (2) at the beginning of this section
CANONICAL FORM OF FINITE SUBSETS OF Zd
5
are automatically verified by Algorithm 3.1. Property (3) is given by the following
theorem.
Theorem 3.2. The function defined by Algorithm 3.1 is a weak canonical form.
Proof. Suppose the function CanonicalFormWithFrame is given in input the
pair (Λ̃, Q̃) instead of (Λ, Q), where Λ̃ = ϕ(Λ) and Q̃ = ϕ(Q) for some ϕ ∈ Aff(d, Z).
Let’s analyze how this change affects the output. We denote all the variables of the
execution of the call CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ̃, Q̃) by adding a tilde over
them, in order to distinguish them from those of the call CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, Q).
First (line 2), we have T̃ = Q̃ ∩ Λ̃ = ϕ(Q) ∩ ϕ(Λ) = ϕ(T ). Then we turn to lines
4-8: inductively it is easy to show that, at each step of the cycle, T̃ = ϕ(T ) (this
is true because the coordinates of a point p ∈ Λ with respect to the frame Q are
the same as the coordinates of the point ϕ(p) ∈ ϕ(Λ) with respect to the frame
ϕ(Q)). So, after the execution of the cycle, we still have T̃ = ϕ(T ) as ordered sets.
Let p̃0 , . . . p̃k be the elements of T̃ , so that p̃i = ϕ(pi ) for all i. Let B be the linear
part of the affinity ϕ (so ϕ has the form x 7→ Bx + v, for some v ∈ Zd ). The i-th
column of the matrix M̃ (line 10) is then p̃i − p̃0 = ϕ(pi ) − ϕ(p0 ) = B(pi − p0 ).
Thus we have the relation M̃ = BM , which means that the matrices M̃ and M
are equivalent to each other, up to left multiplication. In particular, they have the
same Hermite normal form. This means that ÃM̃ = AM (line 11). In other words
(reading this equality column by column), for each i we have that
(1)
à B(pi − p0 ) = A(pi − p0 ).
Relation (1) can be interpreted as follows: the linear transformations ÃB and A
coincide on the vectors pi − p0 , and so they coincide on the linear span of these
vectors, which is the tangent space of Span(Λ) in the point p0 . The affinity ψ̃
defined on line 12 maps x to Ã(x − p̃0 ) = Ã(x − ϕ(p0 )). Now, let p̃ = ϕ(p) be a
point of Λ̃, with p ∈ Λ. Then,
ψ̃(p̃) = Ã p̃ − ϕ(p0 ) = Ã ϕ(p) − ϕ(p0 )
(∗)
= Ã B(p − p0 ) = A(p − p0 ) = ψ(p),
where the equality marked with a (∗) follows by the fact that p − p0 belongs to
the tangent space of Span(Λ) in the point p0 . So we have finally proved that
ψ̃(Λ̃) = ψ(Λ). Similarly, we also have that ψ̃(p̃i ) = ψ(pi ) for all i, and thus
ψ̃(T̃ ) = ψ(T ) as ordered sets.
Remark 3.3. Line 2 of Algorithm 3.1 could be replaced by the simpler initialization
“T ← ∅”, and Theorem 3.2 would still hold. But the slightly more complicated
initialization of line 2 will be required in the proof of Lemma 4.8.
Theorem 3.4. If d is fixed, then the worst-case asymptotic complexity of Algorithm 3.1 is O(n µ(s)), where n = |Λ| and s is an upper bound on the size of the
binary representation of any element of Λ or Q. Moreover, the size of the binary
representation of any element of the returned set Ω is O(s).
Proof. Lines 2-10 require O(n µ(s)) operations. Since the size of M is O(s) the
computation of the Hermite normal form of M can be done in O(µ(s)) time, for
instance combining the triangularization algorithm in [4] and the HNF computation
in [8]. In [8] it is also shown that log kHNF(M )k = O(s), where k · k denotes the
6
GIOVANNI PAOLINI
maximum absolute value of an entry of the matrix. In O(µ(s)) time, A and ψ can
be computed too (and they share the same bound on the coefficients as HNF(M )).
Finally, the computation of ψ(Λ) requires O(n µ(s)) operations, and that of ψ(T )
requires O(µ(s)) operations.
The fact that the binary representation of the elements of Ω is O(s) follows easily
from the previous arguments.
4. Getting an Aff(d, Z)-equivariant set of complete Λ-frames
We will now describe an algorithm which, given an input set Λ ⊆ Zd , equivariantly returns a nonempty set of complete Λ-frames. Here by “equivariantly” we
mean Aff(d, Z)-equivariantly: if Λ̃ = ϕ(Λ) for some ϕ ∈ Aff(d, Z), and the output
of the algorithm applied to Λ is a set of frames {R1 , . . . , Rm }, then the output of
the algorithm applied to Λ̃ is {ϕ(R1 ), . . . , ϕ(Rm )}. Notice that the output set of
frames is unordered, whereas each of the frames is itself an ordered set of points.
Remark 4.1. The set of all complete Λ-frames satisfies the equivariance condition,
but this set is too large for any practical purpose (its size is Ω(nd ) in the worst
case). For this reason we need to equivariantly select a “small” subset of it.
Recall from Section 2 that we denote by F (Λ) the set of all the Λ-frames, and by
Fc (Λ) the set of all complete Λ-frames. The pseudocode for the above-mentioned
algorithm is the following.
Algorithm 4.2 (Equivariant set of complete Λ-frames). This algorithm takes in
input a finite set Λ ⊆ Zd and equivariantly returns a nonempty set of complete
Λ-frames.
1: function EquivariantFrames(Λ)
2:
if |Λ| = 1 then
⊲ Λ has size 1 (base step of the recursion)
3:
return {Λ}
4:
end if
5:
if all the points of Λ are congruent modulo 2 then
6:
p ← any point of Λ
7:
Λ′ ← (Λ − p)/2
⊲ translate point p to origin and divide by 2
8:
S ← EquivariantFrames(Λ′ )
9:
return 2S + p
⊲ perform the inverse transformation
10:
else
11:
{Λ1 , . . . , Λh } ← partition of Λ in congruence classes modulo 2
12:
for i ∈ {1, . . . h} do
13:
Si ← EquivariantFrames(Λi )
14:
end for
Sh S
15:
Λ′ ← i=1 R∈Si R
16:
F ← { T ∈ Fc (Λ′ ) | CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, T ) is
17:
lexicographically minimal }
18:
return F
19:
end if
20: end function
We will now prove the correctness of Algorithm 4.2.
CANONICAL FORM OF FINITE SUBSETS OF Zd
7
Lemma 4.3. Let p, q ∈ Zd , and let ϕ be an element of Aff(d, Z). Then, p ≡ q
(mod 2) if and only if ϕ(p) ≡ ϕ(q) (mod 2). In other words, being congruent
modulo 2 is an affine invariant.
Proof. The affinity ϕ will be of the form x 7→ Ax + b, for some A ∈ GL(d, Z) and
b ∈ Zd . The condition p ≡ q (mod 2) is equivalent to p = q + 2v for some v ∈ Zd .
Applying ϕ to both sides we obtain ϕ(p) = ϕ(q + 2v) = ϕ(q) + 2Av, so ϕ(p) ≡ ϕ(q)
(mod 2). The same argument applied to ϕ−1 proves the converse implication.
Theorem 4.4. Algorithm 4.2 terminates, and it equivariantly returns a set of
complete Λ-frames.
Proof. In each recursive call of EquivariantFrames, either the diameter of Λ is
halved or the size of Λ decreases: the former case occurs if the condition of line 5
holds; the latter occurs in the other case (if not all the points of Λ are congruent
modulo 2, then the partition of line 11 is made of at least two subsets). As long as
the size of Λ remains greater than 1, the diameter of Λ is ≥ 1. So neither of the two
above possibilities can happen infinitely many times, and the algorithm eventually
terminates.
We prove the rest of the statements by induction on the size n of Λ and its
diameter. The base step is n = 1, for which the claim is obvious. We may now
assume n > 1. We will distinguish two cases.
• First case: the condition of line 5 holds. Clearly, by induction, the frames
returned on line 9 are complete Λ-frames. Suppose now that Λ is replaced
by Λ̃ = ϕ(Λ), where ϕ is the affinity given by x 7→ Ax + b. In line 6, a point
p̃ = ϕ(q) is chosen, for some q ∈ Λ. The set Λ̃′ calculated in line 7 is given
by
ϕ(Λ) − ϕ(q)
A(Λ) − A(q)
Λ̃ − p̃
=
=
2
2
2
p−q
p−q
Λ−p
′
+A
= A(Λ ) + A
.
=A
2
2
2
Λ̃′ =
Then the sets Λ′ and Λ̃′ can be obtained one from the other by applying
the affinity x 7→ Ax+ A p−q
. By induction, the set of frames S̃ calculated
2
in line 8 is equivariant. Consequently,
p−q
S̃ = A(S) + A
.
2
Finally, the return value of the call EquivariantFrames(Λ̃) is
p−q
+ ϕ(q)
2S̃ + p̃ = 2A(S) + 2A
2
= 2A(S) + A(p) − A(q) + A(q) + b
= A(2S + p) + b
= ϕ(2S + p),
which is what we wanted.
• Second case: the condition of line 5 is not verified. The sets in F are
complete Λ′ -frames. By construction, Λ′ is a subset of Λ and Span(Λ′ ) =
Span(Λ). So the sets in F are also complete Λ-frames. By Lemma 4.3,
the partition computed on line 11 is Aff(d, Z)-equivariant (notice that such
8
GIOVANNI PAOLINI
partition is an unordered set). Thus the unordered set {S1 , . . . , Sh } is
also equivariant, and so is the union Λ′ . Finally minimizing CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, T ) is an equivariant condition since CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, T ) is Aff(d, Z)-invariant (by Theorem 3.2), so F is
itself equivariant.
Unfortunately, when the partition found on line 11 of Algorithm 4.2 is very
unbalanced (for instance, if |Λ1 | = 1 and |Λ2 | = n − 1), then the depth of the tree
of the recursive calls can grow linearly with n. For this reason, we now present a
variant to Algorithm 4.2, which will turn out to have the worst-case asymptotic
complexity we claimed in Section 2. The idea is to change what is done in lines
16-17, which is a quite rough way to find an equivariant set of frames. To do this,
the new recursive function EquivariantFrames2(Λ, Q) takes one more argument,
a frame Q, and equivariantly returns a nonempty set S of Λ-frames such that, for
each R ∈ S, Q ∪ R is a Λ-covering frame. Similarly to Algorithm 4.2, here by
“equivariantly” we mean that, for any ϕ ∈ Aff(d, Z), we have
EquivariantFrames2(ϕ(Λ), ϕ(Q)) = ϕ EquivariantFrames2(Λ, Q) .
In what follows, we say that a partition {Λ1 , . . . , Λh } of Λ is balanced if |Λi | ≤ n/2
for all i, where n is the size of Λ. Otherwise, we say that the partition is unbalanced.
Algorithm 4.5 (Equivariant set of Λ-frames). This algorithm takes in input a
finite set Λ ⊆ Zd and a frame Q ⊆ Qd , and equivariantly returns a nonempty set
S of Λ-frames, with the property that Q ∩ R = ∅ and Q ∪ R is a Λ-covering frame
for each R ∈ S.
1: function EquivariantFrames2(Λ, Q)
2:
Λ ← Λ \ Span(Q)
3:
if |Λ| ≤ 1 then
4:
return {Λ}
5:
end if
6:
if all the points of Λ are congruent modulo 2 then
7:
p ← any point of Λ
8:
Λ′ ← (Λ − p)/2
9:
Q′ ← (Q − p)/2
10:
S ′ ← EquivariantFrames2(Λ′ , Q′ )
11:
S ← 2S ′ + p
12:
return S
13:
else
14:
{Λ1 , . . . , Λh } ← partition of Λ in congruence classes modulo 2
15:
sort {Λ1 , . . . , Λh } by size
⊲ after this, we have |Λ1 | ≤ · · · ≤ |Λh |
16:
if |Λh | ≤ n/2 then
⊲ the partition is balanced
17:
for i ∈ {1, . . . h} do
18:
Si ← EquivariantFrames2(Λi , Q)
19:
end for
Sh S
20:
Λ′ ← i=1 V ∈Si V
21:
F ← { R ∈ F(Λ′ ) | Q ∩ R = ∅, Q ∪ R is a Λ-covering frame, and
22:
CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, Q ∪ R) is lexicographically
23:
minimal }
24:
else
⊲ the partition is unbalanced
25:
for i ∈ {1, . . . h − 1} do
CANONICAL FORM OF FINITE SUBSETS OF Zd
9
Si ← EquivariantFrames2(Λi , Q)
end for
S
S
Λ′ ← h−1
i=1
V ∈Si V
E ← { R ∈ F(Λ′ ) | Q ∩ R = ∅ and Q ∪ R is a (Λ \ Λh )-covering
26:
27:
28:
29:
frame }
30:
31:
32:
33:
34:
35:
36:
37:
38:
39:
for all R ∈ E do
SR ← EquivariantFrames2(Λh , Q ∪ R)
end for
F ← {R ∪ T | R ∈ E, T ∈ SR , and
CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, Q ∪ R ∪ T ) is
lexicographically minimal }
end if
return F
end if
end function
Let’s describe briefly the steps of Algorithm 4.5. As in Algorithm 4.2, the main
distinction is given by the condition on line 6 (whether all the points of Λ are
congruent modulo 2, or not).
If the condition on line 6 holds (lines 7-12), all the points of Λ and Q are translated and their coordinates are then divided by 2. The recursive call on line 10 gives
an unordered set S ′ of Λ′ -frames, which is then transformed to a set S of Λ-frames.
Lines 14-37 are executed if the condition on line 6 is not verified. If the partition
of line 14 is balanced (lines 17-23), the behaviour is similar to that of Algorithm
4.2: the function EquivariantFrames2 is called recursively for each subset of
the partition (line 18), and then the results are put together on lines 20-23. If the
partition is unbalanced (lines 25-35), the largest subset (Λh ) is treated separately
(notice that the cycle on line 25 goes from 1 to h − 1, not from 1 to h): as we will
see, the reason for this is to increase the asymptotic efficiency.
Remark 4.6. If Q = ∅, then Algorithm 4.5 equivariantly returns a set of complete
Λ-frames, exactly as Algorithm 4.2 does. However, the two outputs may differ:
Algorithms 4.2 and 4.5 calculate different “equivariant forms”.
In the rest of this section, we will prove the correctness of Algorithm 4.5 and we
will analyze its asymptotic complexity.
Theorem 4.7. Algorithm 4.5 terminates, and the set of frames it returns is equivariant.
Proof. The arguments are similar to those of Theorem 4.4. The only main difference
is given by how the set Λh is treated separately in lines 25-35: however, since there
can only be one subset of size greater than n/2, if such a subset exists then it is
equivariant (because the partition itself is equivariant, as we already pointed out
in the proof of Theorem 4.4). So, treating Λh differently from the other subsets of
the partition doesn’t violate the equivariance of the procedure.
Lemma 4.8. For each dimension d > 0 there exists hd > 0 such that, for any
Λ′ ⊆ Λ ⊆ Zd and frame Q such that Λ ⊆ Span(Q∪Λ′ ), and for any pair (Ω, U ) ∈ Yd ,
the set
S = {R Λ′ -frame | Q ∩ R = ∅, Q ∪ R is a Λ-covering frame, and
10
GIOVANNI PAOLINI
CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, Q ∪ R) = (Ω, U )}
has size ≤ hd .
Proof. Let n = |Λ| and k = dim Span(Λ). First of all, we reduce to the case
Span Λ = Qk (where Qk is the affine subspace of Qd consisting of the points with
the last d − k coordinates equal to zero). Notice that, if we change both Λ and Q
by an affinity ϕ ∈ Aff(d, Z), then S changes also by ϕ, and so its size remains the
same. Let’s choose the affinity ϕ (of the form x 7→ Ax + b) as follows.
• b = −q, where q is any fixed point of Λ.
• Let M be the d × n matrix with columns given by the vectors p − q, for
p ∈ Λ (the columns can be arranged in any order). Then, let A ∈ GL(d, Z)
be such that AM = HNF(M ).
Since the rank of M is k, the Hermite normal form of M has the last d − k rows
equal to zero. So the image of Λ through the affinity ϕ is included in Qk , as we
wished. We can thus assume, from now on, that Span(Λ) = Qk .
Let G be the subgroup of Aff(k, Z) given by the affinities ϑ of Zk ⊆ Qk such that
ϑ(Λ) = Λ. Since Λ generates Qk (as an affine space over Q), an affinity ϑ ∈ G is
completely determined by its restriction to Λ. Such a restriction is a permutation
of Λ, by definition of G. So the order of G is at most n!, and in particular G is
finite.
We are now going to define an injective map χ : S → G. Fix a frame R0 ∈ S.
Let R be any frame in S. By definition of S, we have
CFWF(Λ, Q ∪ R) = CFWF(Λ, Q ∪ R0 ) = (Ω, U ),
where we have shortened “CanonicalFormWithFrame” with “CFWF”. Let T
and T0 be the complete Λ-frames constructed throughout the execution of the
function CFWF applied to (Λ, Q ∪ R) and (Λ, Q ∪ R0 ), respectively. Recall that, as
an immediate consequence of how the function CFWF is defined, there exist (not
necessarily unique) affinities ψ, ψ0 ∈ Aff(d, Z) such that
ψ(Λ) = Ω, ψ(T ) = U, ψ0 (Λ) = Ω, ψ0 (T0 ) = U.
Let ξ = ψ
−1
◦ ψ0 . The situation is well explained by the following diagram.
(Λ, T0 )
ξ
ψ0
(Λ, T )
ψ
(Ω, U )
So, ξ(Λ) = Λ and ξ(T0 ) = T . The affinity ξ will be of the form x 7→ Bx + c, for
some B ∈ GL(d, Z) and c ∈ Zd . Since ξ(Λ) = Λ, the submodule Zk ⊆ Zd is mapped
into itself by ξ. So c belongs to Zk (because it is the image of 0, which belongs to
Zk ) and B can be written as a block matrix in the following way:
B1 B2
,
B=
0 B3
where the block B1 is k × k and the block B3 is (d − k) × (d − k). Notice that,
since B is in GL(d, Z), both B1 and B3 must have determinant equal to 1 or −1. In
particular, B1 is in GL(k, Z). Consequently, the affinity ϑ defined by x 7→ B1 x + c
CANONICAL FORM OF FINITE SUBSETS OF Zd
11
belongs to Aff(k, Z). By construction, we also have that ϑ(Λ) = Λ and ϑ(T0 ) = T .
Finally, we define
χ(R) = ϑ.
As anticipated, we will now show that χ is injective. Suppose that we have
χ(R1 ) = χ(R2 ) = ϑ, for some R1 , R2 ∈ S. Let T1 and T2 be the complete Λ-frames
constructed throughout the execution of the function CFWF applied to (Λ, Q ∪R1 )
and (Λ, Q∪R2 ), respectively. As a consequence of what we proved above, ϑ(T0 ) = T1
and ϑ(T0 ) = T2 . Thus, T1 = T2 . Assume now by contradiction that R1 6= R2 . Since
R1 and R2 are both subsets of Λ, we have that (Q ∪ R1 ) ∩ Λ 6= (Q ∪ R2 ) ∩ Λ. Then
the values of T1 and T2 , as they are initialized on line 2 of Algorithm 3.1, are
different. Therefore, T1 and T2 are different at the end of the execution too. This
is a contradiction, because we proved that T1 = T2 . So χ is injective.
Define now π : G → GL(k, Z) as the map that sends an affinity ϑ ∈ G, of the form
x 7→ Ex + c, to its linear part E ∈ GL(k, Z). The map π is a group homomorphism,
and ker π is the subgroup of G consisting of the translations. Since G is finite,
it doesn’t contain any nontrivial translation (because nontrivial translations have
infinite order). This means that ker π is trivial, so π is injective.
It is shown in [5] that, for any fixed d, there exists a constant hd > 0 such that
every finite subgroup of GL(d, Z) has order ≤ hd . The group G can be regarded
(through the injective homomorphism π) as a subgroup of GL(d, Z), so G has order
≤ hd . Since we have built an injection χ : S → G, the size of S is also ≤ hd .
Lemma 4.9. If the dimension d is fixed, then the number of frames returned by
any call to EquivariantFrames2 is O(1). In other words, there exists a constant
hd > 0 (depending on d) such that
|EquivariantFrames2(Λ, Q)| ≤ hd
∀ Λ, Q.
Proof. The constant hd will be the same as that of Lemma 4.8. Let us analyze
the possible return values of a call to EquivariantFrames2. The size of the set
returned on line 12 is that of EquivariantFrames2(Λ′ , Q′ ); working by induction
on the diameter of Λ, we can assume that such size is ≤ hd . The other possible
return values are those assigned on lines 21 and 33; in both cases, Lemma 4.8
assures that the size is ≤ hd .
Theorem 4.10. If the dimension d is fixed, then the asymptotic complexity of Algorithm 4.5 is O(n log2 n s µ(s)), where n and s are as in the statement of Theorem
3.4.
Proof. We prove by induction that the execution of EquivariantFrames2(Λ, Q)
requires at most γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s) + β operations, where γ and β are some
constants (depending on d), w = d − dim Span(Q), δ is the diameter of Λ (which
we will denote by diam(Λ)), and the function f is defined later in the proof (and
depends on d). Once we prove this, we are done since w ≤ d = O(1) and log δ =
O(s).
The induction is made on the triple (|Λ|, diam(Λ), |Q|). The ordering on such
triples is the lexiographic one.
Base case: |Λ| = 1. Only lines 2-4 are executed, and the total number of
operations is O(1). Thus, it is sufficient to choose the constant β large enough.
12
GIOVANNI PAOLINI
Inductive step. Lines 2-5 require O(ns) operations. Let us now analyze lines
6-12: their cost is O(ns) plus the cost of the recursive call on line 10, which is (by
induction) γf (w) n log2 n (log δ − 1) µ(s), since the diameter of Λ is halved.
Lines 14-15 require O(ns) operations, since h ≤ 2d = O(1).
Now we turn to lines 17-23. Let ni = |Λi |. The cost of the recursive calls alone
(line 18) is then, by induction,
h
X
γf (w) ni log2 ni log δ µ(s) + β
i=1
n
log δ µ(s) + hβ
2
= γf (w) n (log n − 1)2 log δ µ(s) + O(1).
≤ γf (w) (n1 + · · · + nh ) log2
By Lemma 4.9, the size of Λ′ on line 20 is O(1), so the number of operations required
for lines 21-23 is O(n µ(s)) (by Theorem 3.4) plus the cost of sets comparison, which
is O(ns log n).
We finally turn to lines 25-35. The cost of the recursive calls on line 26 is
h−1
X
γf (w) ni log2 ni log δ µ(s) + β
i=1
n
≤ γf (w) (n1 + · · · + nh−1 ) log2 log δ µ(s) + (h − 1)β
2
n
≤ γf (w) (log n − 1)2 log δ µ(s) + O(1).
2
By Lemma 4.9, the sets Λ′ and E have size O(1), so lines 28-29 require O(µ(s))
operations to be executed. As another consequence, there is a bound η on the
number of recursive calls on line 31. Notice that |Q ∪ R| > |Q|, because Λ′ is
nonempty (since h ≥ 2) and contains only points that don’t belong to Span(Q)
(thanks to line 2). So, each of the calls of line 31 requires a number of operations
bounded by
γf (w − 1) n log2 n log δ µ(s) + β.
Finally, O(n µ(s) + ns log n) operations are required for lines 33-35 (as for lines
21-23).
We now define the function f in the following way: f (w) = (2η)w , where η is
the bound we introduced in the previous paragraph.
Let us put everything together. We obtain the following results, depending on
which lines are executed.
• Lines 2-5 and 6-12 (all points of Λ are congruent modulo 2):
O(ns) + γf (w) n log2 n (log δ − 1) µ(s) + β
≤ α1 ns + γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s) − γf (w) n log2 n µ(s)
= γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s) + n α1 s − γf (w) log2 n µ(s)
≤ γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s).
The first inequality holds for any constant α1 such that α1 ns is greater
than the term O(ns) + β. The last inequality holds for a sufficiently large
value of γ, since µ(s) = Ω(s).
• Lines 2-5, 14-15 and 17-23 (balanced partition):
O(n µ(s) + ns log n) + γf (w) n (log n − 1)2 log δ µ(s)
CANONICAL FORM OF FINITE SUBSETS OF Zd
13
≤ α2 n log n µ(s) + γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s) − γf (w) n log n log δ µ(s)
≤ γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s) + n log n µ(s) α2 − γf (w) log δ
≤ γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s).
The first inequality holds for any constant α2 such that α2 n log n µ(s) is
greater than the term O(n µ(s) + ns log n). The last inequality holds for a
sufficiently large value of γ.
• Lines 2-5, 14-15 and 25-35 (unbalanced partition):
n
O(n µ(s) + ns log n) + γf (w) (log n − 1)2 log δ µ(s) +
2
+ η γf (w − 1) n log2 n log δ µ(s) + ηβ
1
≤ α3 n log n µ(s) + γf (w) n log n (log n − 1) log δ µ(s) +
2
+ η γf (w − 1) n log2 n log δ µ(s)
1
= α3 n log n µ(s) + γf (w) n (log2 n − log n) log δ µ(s) +
2
1
+ γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s)
2
1
= α3 n log n µ(s) + γf (w) n log2 n log δ µ(s) − γf (w) n log n log δ µ(s)
2
1
2
≤ γf (w) n log n log δ µ(s) + n log n µ(s) α3 − γf (w) log δ
2
2
≤ γf (w) n log n log δ µ(s).
The first inequality holds for any constant α3 such that α3 n log n µ(s) is
greater than the term O(n µ(s) + ns log n) + ηβ. The second step follows
from the identity 2ηf (w − 1) = f (w), which is an immediate consequence of
the definition of f . The last inequality is true for a sufficiently large value
of γ.
5. Canonical form for Xd
Using the results of Sections 3 and 4, we are now able to easily describe an
algorithm to compute a canonical form for Xd .
Algorithm 5.1 (Canonical form for Xd ). This algorithm takes in input a finite set
Λ ⊆ Zd , and returns a canonical form for Λ in the sense of Definition 2.1.
1: function CanonicalForm(Λ)
2:
S ← EquivariantFrames2(Λ, ∅)
3:
for all R ∈ S do
4:
(ΩR , UR ) ← CanonicalFormWithFrame(Λ, R)
5:
end for
6:
return min { ΩR | R ∈ S }
7: end function
In words, Algorithm 5.1 first equivariantly computes a set S of complete Λframes, using Algorithm 4.5. Then, for each Λ-frame R ∈ S, it finds a corresponding
canonical set ΩR . Finally, it returns the set which is lexicographically minimal
among the computed ones.
14
GIOVANNI PAOLINI
Theorem 5.2. The output of Algorithm 5.1 is a canonical form for Xd with respect to the action of Aff(d, Z). Moreover its worst-case asymptotic complexity is
O(n log2 n s µ(s)), where n and s are defined as in Section 2.
Proof. The first property of Definition 2.1 is verified since Algorithm 3.1 satisfies
property (1) at the beginning of Section 3. The second property of Definition 2.1
is an immediate consequence of Theorems 3.2 and 4.7.
By Theorem 4.10, the execution of line 2 requires O(n log2 n s µ(s)) operations.
By Lemma 4.9, the size of S is O(1). Thus, by Theorem 3.4, the execution of lines
3-5 requires O(n µ(s)) operations. The overall asymptotic complexity is therefore
O(n log2 n s µ(s)).
6. Canonical form of Alexander polynomials
In Section 1 we briefly presented the problem of computing a group invariant
from the Alexander polynomial ∆(t1 , . . . , td ), which is not an invariant itself since
it is not uniquely defined. In this section we are going to describe in more detail
how the group of integer affinities acts on the Alexander polynomial, and we are
going to illustrate how to adjust Algorithm 5.1 in order to compute a canonical
form of the Alexander polynomial. Such a canonical form gives rise to an invariant
of the group (actually there is still the possibility of changing the sign of the entire
polynomial, but this problem is easily solved e.g. choosing the sign so that the
leading term has positive coefficient).
−1
The Alexander polynomial belongs to the ring R = Z[t1 , t−1
1 , . . . , td , td ] of the
Laurent polynomials with integer coefficients. Hence it has the form
X
md
1
∆(t1 , . . . , td ) =
αm1 ,...,md tm
1 · · · td ,
m1 ,...,md ∈Z
where only a finite number of coefficients αm1 ,...,md is nonzero. The action of
Aff(d, Z) on R is by means of Z-linear automorphism, so it can be described on a
md
1
single monomial tm
1 · · · td . An integer affinity ϕ ∈ Aff(d, Z) maps the monomial
md
m1
t1 · · · td to the monomial tp11 · · · tpdd , where
m1
p1
..
..
. = ϕ . .
pd
md
A polynomial ∆(t1 , . . . , td ) ∈ R can be viewed as a finite set of points in Zd (the
set of vectors (m1 , . . . , md )t for which the coefficient αm1 ,...,md is nonzero) with
an integer coefficient αm1 ,...,md associated to each point. Under this identification,
the action of Aff(d, Z) is precisely the natural action on the subsets of Zd , with
the subtlety that these subsets are weighted. In analogy with the notation of the
previous sections, we will call Xdw the set of finite weighted subsets of Zd (the
weights are given by nonzero integers).
Algorithms 3.1, 4.5 and 5.1, without any change, work as well for the case of Xdw .
What changes is that every operation involving elements of Xd must now involve
elements of Xdw . For instance CanonicalFormWithFrame must output, as first
element of the pair, a weighted set. Therefore, on lines 33-35 of Algorithm 4.5, the
minimality check must take into account the weights as well, so that two sets with
the same elements but with different weight are not treated as equal.
CANONICAL FORM OF FINITE SUBSETS OF Zd
15
We omit the proof of correctness and the proof of the complexity bound since
they are entirely analogous to the case of Xd , which was thoroughly described in
the previous sections.
7. Conclusions
The algorithm we have presented in Sections 3-5 computes a canonical form of
subsets of Zd up to affinity, and has asymptotic complexity O(n log2 n s µ(s)) for
any fixed dimension d. We chose to omit explicit analysis on how the multiplicative
constant grows in terms of d.
There are many possible improvements that can lower such constant. For instance, in Algorithm 4.5, one can further exploit the canonical partition {Λ1 , . . . , Λh }
to significantly reduce the number of frames R considered on lines 21-23 and 33-35.
However, since such improvements affect only the constant, we have preferred to
ignore them in order to keep the pseudocode as essential as possible.
The described algorithms were implemented in Python by the author, using the
NZMATH library [9]. Several improvements were made, making the implemented
version slightly different from the pseudocode of the previous sections, in order to
achieve a higher efficiency.
It is finally worth noticing that the presented algorithms can be easily modified to
also output an affinity which sends the input set Λ to its canonical form. Therefore,
when deciding whether two given sets Λ and Λ′ are in the same orbit with respect
to the action of Aff(d, Z), in case of affirmative answer it is possible to explicitly
obtain an affinity that sends Λ to Λ′ .
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my father Maurizio Paolini for having introduced me to the
problem and for his valuable suggestions. I would also like to thank Luca Ghidelli
for the useful discussions and for his careful reading of this paper. Finally, I would
like to thank professors Patrizia Gianni, Carlo Traverso and Giovanni Gaiffi for
their advice.
References
[1] Giovanni Bellettini, Valentina Beorchia, Maurizio Paolini, and Franco Pasquarelli, Shape reconstruction from apparent contours: Theory and algorithms, vol. 44, Springer, 2015.
[2] Henri Cohen, A course in computational algebraic number theory, vol. 138, Springer, 1993.
[3] Ralph H. Fox, Free differential calculus II. The isomorphism problem of groups, Annals of
Mathematics 59 (1954), 196–210.
[4] James L. Hafner and Kevin S. McCurley, Asymptotically fast triangularization of matrices
over rings, SIAM Journal on Computing 20 (1991), no. 6, 1068–1083.
[5] Hermann Minkowski, Zur Theorie der positiven quadratischen Formen, Journal für die reine
und angewandte Mathematik 101 (1887), 196–202 (ger).
[6] Morris Newman, Integral matrices, vol. 45, Academic Press, 1972.
[7] Arnold Schönhage and Volker Strassen, Schnelle multiplikation grosser zahlen, Computing 7
(1971), no. 3-4, 281–292.
[8] Arne Storjohann, Computing Hermite and Smith normal forms of triangular integer matrices,
Linear Algebra and its Applications 282 (1998), no. 1, 25–45.
[9] Satoru Tanaka, Naoki Ogura, Ken Nakamula, Tetsushi Matsui, and Shigenori Uchiyama, Nzmath 1.0, Mathematical Software–ICMS 2010 (2010), 260–269.
| 4math.GR
|
arXiv:1704.06942v1 [cs.AI] 23 Apr 2017
Population Seeding Techniques for Rolling Horizon
Evolution in General Video Game Playing
Raluca D. Gaina
Simon M. Lucas
Diego Pérez-Liébana
University of Essex
Colchester, UK
Email: [email protected]
University of Essex
Colchester, UK
Email: [email protected]
University of Essex
Colchester, UK
Email: [email protected]
Abstract—While Monte Carlo Tree Search and closely related
methods have dominated General Video Game Playing, recent
research has demonstrated the promise of Rolling Horizon
Evolutionary Algorithms as an interesting alternative. However,
there is little attention paid to population initialization techniques
in the setting of general real-time video games. Therefore, this
paper proposes the use of population seeding to improve the
performance of Rolling Horizon Evolution and presents the
results of two methods, One Step Look Ahead and Monte Carlo
Tree Search, tested on 20 games of the General Video Game
AI corpus with multiple evolution parameter values (population
size and individual length). An in-depth analysis is carried out
between the results of the seeding methods and the vanilla
Rolling Horizon Evolution. In addition, the paper presents a
comparison to a Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm. The
results are promising, with seeding able to boost performance
significantly over baseline evolution and even match the high
level of play obtained by the Monte Carlo Tree Search.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Recent literature features General Video Game Playing
(GVGP) more and more, with various researchers using different Game AI frameworks for benchmarking general AI
agents [1][2][3]. The authors all seem to be in agreement that,
although this is a great challenge, its importance is undeniable,
exceeding video games.
GVGP is an area focused on developing Artificial Intelligence agents able to achieve a high performance in any
previously unknown environment, therefore striving towards
General Artificial Intelligence through video games. Games
make an excellent domain for testing AI techniques, due
to their varying complexity and wide range of problems
presented. Additionally, experiments can easily be run multiple
times in a constrained scenario, with minimal costs in case of
errors and fast feedback, a stark contrast to other areas such
as robotics.
This study is carried out using the General Video Game
AI [4] corpus of games, which provides a large collection
of interesting and diverse real-time challenges. The GVGAI
competition1 has been running for 3 years now and it has
increased its coverage in 2016 through a Two Player Planning
Track [5] and a Level Generation Track [6]. There are several
other types of problems in development, such as a Learning
1 www.gvgai.net
978-1-5090-4601-0/17/$31.00 c 2017 IEEE
Track (which strips the agents of the Forward Model), ScreenCapture Learning or Rule Generation.
As AI achieves super-human performance in even the most
complex of individual games, the more general approach
of GVGAI will become increasingly attractive. In 2016, AI
became super-human at Go [7], and this is speculation on our
part, but we believe StarCraft is likely to be dominated by AI
within the next few years.
The experiment described in this paper attempts to improve
upon a basic Rolling Horizon Evolutionary Algorithm (RHEA)
and obtain better performance when tested on a subset of
20 games of the GVGAI corpus. The proposed technique is
focused on generating a better than random initial population
from which to start the evolution process i.e. by seeding the
population. Two different methods are used to this end, a One
Step Look Ahead algorithm and Monte Carlo Tree Search,
their performance analyzed on multiple RHEA parameter configurations (varying population sizes and individual lengths).
The rest of this document follows a typical structure. Section
II gives an overview of literature in this domain. Section
III covers the basic background information necessary on
the framework and algorithms used in this study. Section
IV reviews the experimental approach and setup. Section V
reports the results obtained and offers a detailed analysis.
Finally, Section VI wraps up the paper by drawing conclusions
and identifying future work.
II. R ELEVANT R ESEARCH
Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) provide a simple, robust and
generally applicable approach for searching a wide variety
of spaces, and have been the subject of intensive research
for more than five decades. In terms of their application to
Game AI, much of the effort has been focused on evolving AI
agents, or on evolving game content (such as level design) [8]
[9], game rules or game parameters. Recently, it was shown
that Evolutionary Algorithms could be applied as any-time
and real-time decision making algorithms for use in Game AI,
adopting a similar simulation-driven approach to Monte Carlo
Tree Search, while being simpler to implement and offering
competitive performance [10]. This was initially done for oneplayer games, but was extended to 2-player games in the form
of Rolling Horizon Co-Evolution [11].
Various enhancements of EAs have been considered, including hybridization. One example is the usage of evolution integrated into the Monte Carlo Tree Search simulation
step [12] or in the roll-out phase to evolve a better policy [13].
Recently, work has moved to incorporate tree structures or
Upper Confidence Bounds (UCB) into the evolution instead
for a guided and more informed process [14].
One thing that all Evolutionary Algorithms have in common, regardless of any additional features or the actual evolutionary techniques used, is the initialization of the population.
There have been several attempts at exploring this particular
improvement. Kazimipour et al. [15] review all the various
methods present in literature and categorize them according to
various factors: randomness, compositionality and generality.
They identified several techniques which would work in a
general environment; however, they suggest that these methods
are computationally expensive, therefore not translating well
to real time games, for example, which is the domain this
paper focuses on.
In addition, Kim et al. [16] analyze the effects of initializing
an EA population using an optimal solution determined by a
Temporal Difference Learning algorithm in the game Othello.
This addition appears to lead to a significant improvement in
performance and future work in the area is encouraged.
The issue with initializing the population with pseudorandom numbers is raised by Maaranen et al. [17], who
instead propose a quasi-random sequence method meant to
obtain more evenly distributed points in a multi-individual
population, in order to better explore the search space. This
technique is applied to a genetic algorithm and it is tested on
52 global optimization problems. Their results are promising,
suggesting a higher level of performance over the traditional
initialization method.
When it comes to General Video Game Playing, Monte
Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) methods have dominated so far
and their variations have been explored in various works, as
depicted in a survey by Browne et al. [18]. In the General
Video Game AI competition, Open-Loop MCTS emerged as
the most powerful method out of the sample controllers provided, standing at the base of multiple participant algorithms
and even the winner of the first edition of the competition (ran
in 2014), Adrien Couëtoux [4].
However, the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE) [19],
still in use by companies such as Google DeepMind [20], was
one of the first frameworks to allow testing of general agents
on video games, presenting the agents with the game through
screen capture and requiring an in-game action at every step.
Unlike GVGAI, there are limitations to ALE games definition.
While the performance achieved by Mnih et al [20] using
Deep Q-Networks (DQN) applied to the ALE environment
was impressive, their main goal was to show what could be
achieved just be learning to act given the screen capture of the
game and a reward function, a process that involves a lengthy
training period.
Our interest in the current paper is in methods which can
exploit the Forward Model (FM) of the game to achieve
intelligent behaviour instantly. Rolling Horizon Evolutionary
Algorithms (RHEA) show great promise in this respect. The
Forward Model is a game simulator which can be used to
rapidly test the consequences of taking a series of actions,
given the current game state. As mentioned above, Perez et
al. [10] tested RHEA techniques on the Physical Salesman
Traveling Problem and their results were competitive with
MCTS, encouraging research in the area.
III. BACKGROUND
A. General Video Game AI
GVGAI aims to provide a framework for benchmarking
general Artificial Intelligent agents. It currently offers 140
games in total, 100 of which are single player and 40 twoplayer, some of which stochastic and all real-time. The study
in this paper is focused on the single player framework. The
games are played by the agents in black box mode, without
any knowledge of the rules (e.g. different scoring systems,
conditions for ending the game or types of objects in the game
- NPCs, portals, resources), but being able to query the current
game state for information on game objects.
In addition, future possible states may be simulated using
a Forward Model (FM), which requires an action the agent
would wish to perform and returns the game state resulting
from that action. However, it is worth noting that any states
returned by the FM may not be an accurate representation of
the real game due to stochasticity.
The agents have only 40ms to make decisions regarding
which action to play in the next game tick, except for the
initialization step at the start of a game, where they receive 1s
thinking time. A legal action must be provided at the end of
the allocated budget, which may vary in the games between
movement or special actions (such as shooting).
B. Evolutionary Algorithms
The algorithms used in this study are based on the Rolling
Horizon Evolutionary Algorithm (RHEA) [10], which encode
individuals as sequences of actions. The term “Rolling Horizon” refers to the fact that the first action of the plan evolved
is executed in one game step, then the plan is reevaluated
and adjusted, looking one step further into the future, thus
slowly expanding the “horizon”. Each individual in the EA is
evaluated in a similar manner: the actions are simulated with
the use of a Forward Model (FM) following the sequence; the
value associated with the state reached at the end (approximated by a heuristic function) is used as the fitness value of
the individual.
RHEA’s evolution process consists of several iterations
(dictated by a fixed number, or a time or memory budget,
for example) beginning with population initialization. Subsequently, mutation, tournaments, crossover and other evolutionary methods are used to change individuals and produce new
ones. The offspring are evaluated through the steps described
above and assigned a fitness value, which leads to the decision
of keeping or discarding it in order to move to the next
generation with the best individuals found so far. At the end
of the process, the algorithm returns the first gene of the best
individual in the final population as the action to be played
in the game. The evolution is then repeated in the next game
tick in the new game state received.
C. Monte Carlo Tree Search
Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is a search-based technique which consists of four steps, iterated over repeatedly
until a pre-defined budget is reached (a number of iterations,
memory or time, for example). The action returned at the end
of the process is the child of the root node considered the best
by a recommendation policy (e.g. the most visited child).
In the first step in the process, MCTS selects a non-terminal
and not yet fully expanded leaf of the tree via a tree policy.
Secondly, a child of the selected node is added to the tree.
Thirdly, it simulates ahead, using the new child as the root of
a Monte Carlo simulation, with the help of the FM provided
by the system. And finally, a heuristic is used to evaluate the
state reached at the end of the simulation step and all of the
parents of the selected node, up to the root of the tree, are
updated with this value.
The algorithm used in this paper implements an Open Loop
variant of this technique, concretely the sample controller from
the GVGAI competition. Open Loop means that only statistics
and not the actual game states are stored in the nodes of the
tree, the FM being used when traversing the tree to simulate
the game states. More details of Monte Carlo Tree Search,
together with its variations and applications can be found
in [18].
IV. A PPROACH AND E XPERIMENTAL S ETUP
The aim of this paper is to explore whether initializing
the population of an Evolutionary Algorithm with individuals
better than random produces an improvement in performance
when applied to General Video Game Playing.
This hypothesis was tested by using 2 different initialization
techniques to design variants of the vanilla RHEA, the baseline
algorithm in this study, A-Vanilla. Algorithm B-1SLA-S is
a seeding variant which employs a One Step Look Ahead
technique to select a better starting point in the search space.
Algorithm C-MCTS-S uses Monte Carlo Tree Search to seed
the RHEA for better analysis of the search space. A fourth
algorithm’s performance was compared against the RHEA
variants, an Open Loop Monte Carlo Tree Search (algorithm
D-MCTS), in the simple implementation of the GVGAI competition sample controller.
The effect of the initialization techniques was tested on different configurations of the RHEA algorithm, with population
sizes (P ) and individual lengths (L) in the subsequent ranges:
P = {1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20}, L = {6, 8, 10, 14, 16, 20}, following
the diagonal of the matrix these values would form. In the case
of algorithm D-MCTS, its roll-out depth was kept the same
as RHEA individual length in order to make the approaches
comparable. The largest value tested was 20 due to the fact
that, by allowing half of the budget for MCTS computation in
algorithm C-MCTS-S, higher values for population size and
TABLE I
NAMES , INDEXES AND TYPES OF THE 20 GAMES FROM THE SUBSET
SELECTED . L EGEND : S - S TOCHASTIC , D - D ETERMINISTIC .
Idx
0
13
18
25
36
49
58
61
75
84
Name
Aliens
Butterflies
Chase
Crossfire
Escape
Infection
Lemmings
Modality
Roguelike
Survive Zombies
Type
S
S
D
S
D
S
D
D
S
S
Idx
4
15
22
29
46
50
60
67
77
91
Name
Bait
Camel Race
Chopper
Dig Dug
Hungry Birds
Intersection
Missile Command
Plaque Attack
Sea Quest
Wait for Breakfast
Type
D
D
S
S
D
S
D
D
S
D
individual length would result in the algorithm not being able
to evaluate even 1 whole population in the initialization step.
A. Games
All of the algorithms were tested on the same subset of
20 single-player games of the current GVGAI corpus. As the
aim was to observe performance in different game types, two
classifications were used in order to determine a set of games
fit for this experiment. Mark Nelson presented a large scale
analysis of a basic Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm in 62
games, which were sorted based on the performance of this
algorithm [21]. Bontrager et al. used clustering techniques on
49 GVGAI games [22] based on various features to obtain
rough groups of similar games. The 20 games selected for
this experiment were uniformly sampled from both works for
a balanced set of 10 stochastic and 10 deterministic games
(see Table I for indices, names and types of these games, as
used in the rest of this paper).
In order to account for the stochastic aspect of the algorithms used in this study, as well as half of the games included
in the set, each algorithm was run 100 times on each game (20
times on each of the 5 levels available). The budget offered for
decision-making in each game tick was 900 FM calls, which is
the average number of FM calls that A-Vanilla achieves in the
40ms of computational time in the complete 100 games in the
GVGAI-1P corpus. The choice of using FM calls instead of
CPU time was made in order to ensure that variations on the
machine used for running the experiments would not impact
the results, together with the fact that simulating the game
ticks is the most expensive part of each algorithm under test.
B. Vanilla RHEA (Algorithm A-Vanilla)
The algorithm described in this subsection is the baseline
used in the study and follows the same technique described
in [23]. It employs a pseudo-random initialization of the
population, each gene in the individuals taking on an integer
value returned by an RNG (Random Number Generator). Each
value is between 0 and N − 1 inclusive, where N is the
maximum number of legal actions which can be performed
from the current game state, therefore the integers mapping to
an in-game action.
The evolutionary process continues slightly differently depending on the size of the population. When there is only 1
individual considered, a new one is mutated at each generation
and the individual with the highest fitness value is carried
forward to the next iteration. Uniform crossover is introduced
for population sizes of 2 or more and a tournament with size
2 is used to select the parents of the resulting offspring in
the cases where populations contain 3 or more individuals.
The mutation operator is random, the 1 gene of the individual
selected being changed to a different possible value, chosen
uniformly at random.
The fitness function consists of a simple heuristic, returning
the current game score of the state reached after advancing the
Forward Model through all the actions in the individual (or
until the end of the game). If an end-game state was reached
and it resulted in a loss or a win for the player, the value
returned is instead either a large penalty or a large reward,
respectively.
C. One Step Look Ahead Seeding (Algorithm B-1SLA-S)
The One Step Look Ahead (1SLA) algorithm is a simple
technique which exhaustively searches through the actions
available from the current state and associates each a Q value,
corresponding to the approximated value of the game state
reached after performing each action (the value is defined by
the same heuristic employed by RHEA). It then selects for
execution the action with the highest Q value.
Algorithm B-1SLA-S uses the same evolutionary process
as A-Vanilla described above, but the first individual in the
initial population is the solution recommended by the 1SLA
technique. L iterations of the algorithm are performed, one for
each gene in the individual: an exhaustive search is carried out
through all of the actions available from the current state, the
game state is advanced using the Forward Model, through the
best action found and the process is repeated until either the
end of the individual or the end of the game is reached. In the
second case, the rest of the individual is padded with randomly
selected actions.
If the population size is bigger than 1, the rest of the individuals are obtained by mutating the first individual obtained
from the 1SLA algorithm. This method was thought to reduce
random bias (the vanilla algorithm potentially not being able
to find the current best action because of the random seeding)
and to provide a better starting point for evolution.
D. Monte Carlo Tree Search Seeding (Algorithm C-MCTS-S)
Algorithm C-MCTS-S splits the budget received and uses
half of it to first run a Monte Carlo tree search on the current
game state, following the steps described in Section III-C. The
roll-out depth is set to the same value as the individual length
in A-Vanilla
√ and the UCB1 formula (with constant C taking
the value 2) is applied as tree policy (see Equation 1).
(
∗
a = arg max Q(s, a) + C
a∈A(s)
s
ln N (s)
N (s, a)
)
(1)
The first individual in the initial RHEA population is then
seeded using the solution recommended by MCTS. Only the
first K relevant nodes are selected, by traversing the tree
through the most visited actions (the same method used by
algorithm D-MCTS when selecting its final action to play). A
node is relevant if it has been visited at least M = 3 times.
The rest of the individual (if any genes have not received a
value) is padded with randomly chosen legal actions.
V. R ESULTS AND D ISCUSSION
The analysis in this section uses a two-tailed Mann-Whitney
non-parametric U test to measure the statistical significance
of the results for each game (p-value = 0.05), applied to two
performance indicators: win rate and game score achieved.
In general, both seeding techniques improve the performance of the vanilla algorithm much more when the population size and individual length are small than when they increase. This is in line with the findings in the study performed
by Gaina et. al [23], where Random Search (RS) emerged as
the best algorithm in the limited budget offered. Therefore, the
more the parameter values increase towards RS, the less the
impact of the seeding can be observed.
Table V presents an overall win rate comparison between the
two seeding variants and vanilla RHEA, across all games and
configurations. The bottom of the table sums up the number
of games in which one algorithm was significantly better than
the other two, leading to a total of unique games where a significant improvement was noticed, in all configurations tested.
Table IV is a complete results example for the configuration
P = 1, L = 6 (see Figure 1 for visualization), the rest of the
tables being omitted due to space limitations.
A. Overall Seeding Comparison
The general trend observed in this study is that the MCTS
seeding variant performs significantly better than both algorithms A-Vanilla and B-1SLA-S in 8 unique games for win
rate and 13 unique games for scores across all configurations,
while being significantly worse than either of the other two in
only 4 games for both win rate and score.
It is worth noting that there were a reduced number of games
in which A-Vanilla or B-1SLA-S turned out to consistently be
significantly better than C-MCTS-S: games with indices 36
and 91 (Escape and Wait for Breakfast, respectively) for both
win rate and score and game with index 50 (Intersection) for
score only. This is due to the poor performance of MCTS in
these games, which is improved in the seeded algorithm over
D-MCTS.
In addition, the MCTS seeding shows a steady improvement
in several games. The win rates in the games with indices 0,
13 and 22 (Aliens, Butterflies and Chopper, respectively) see
an increase to very close to 100% in all configurations. The
biggest improvement is observed in game 22, where the AVanilla win rate for the smallest configuration (P = 1, L = 6)
is only 26% to begin with (p 0.0001).
This leads to the conclusion that identifying the type of
game being played and applying the correct algorithm seeding
Fig. 1. Win rate of algorithms A-Vanilla, B-1SLA-S and C-MCTS-S with configuration P = 1, L = 6 in all 20 games.
TABLE II
PAIR - WISE SIGNIFICANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN VANILLA RHEA, O NE
S TEP L OOK A HEAD SEEDED RHEA AND MCTS SEEDED RHEA.
Algorithm
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
1-6
1 (1)
6 (7)
A-Vanilla
C-MCTS-S
2 (1)
10 (16)
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
2 (3)
6 (11)
2-8
0 (0)
1 (5)
2 (3)
6 (11)
2 (4)
8 (11)
5-10
0 (1)
0 (4)
10-14
3 (5)
0 (1)
4 (3)
1 (5)
2 (3)
4 (7)
2 (3)
4 (9)
3 (4)
6 (12)
15-16
5 (8)
0 (2)
20-20
5 (10)
0 (2)
Total
8 (11)
6 (8)
2 (4)
2 (5)
2 (4)
0 (5)
4 (5)
12 (16)
2 (4)
6 (11)
2 (4)
6 (11)
3 (5)
10 (13)
and parameters through a meta-heuristic would be highly
beneficial to a general AI agent. However, there are also
games such as 29 (Dig Dug), 58 (Lemmings) and 77 (Sea
Quest) in which the win rate for all algorithms remains at 0%,
these being particularly difficult games which require greater
exploration that neither technique can provide.
B. Pair-wise Seeding Comparison
Pair-wise significance comparison between algorithms AVanilla, B-1SLA-S and C-MCTS-S on all the configurations
tested can be observed in Table II. The values represent the
number of games (out of 20 total) in which one algorithm was
significantly better than the other regarding victories, as well
as scores, in brackets. The totals sum up the unique games
in which one algorithm was significantly better than the other
across all configurations (maximum of 20).
1) A-Vanilla vs B-1SLA-S: The One Step Look Ahead
seeding appears to produce the best results where the RHEA
parameter values are very small (improvements in 6 games
for win rate and 7 games for score), a change being, however,
noticed halfway through the table where the seeding variant
actually becomes significantly worse than the vanilla version
in up to 5 games for win rate and 10 games for score. Overall,
across all configurations tested, the 1SLA seeding appears to
be worse than the baseline algorithm.
A study of the complete matrix of small parameter values
(P = {1, 2, 5}, L = {6, 8, 10}), where the difference in
performance is most observed, reveals that the variance in
individual length and population size have different effects.
On the one hand, increasing the size of the population results
in a decrease in the number of games it is significantly better in
when compared to A-Vanilla, which is due to the fact that the
seeding variant explores the search space much less, with only
one optimal solution mutated for all of its individuals. On the
other hand, the performance is proportional to the individual
length, suggesting that the directed search provided by 1SLA
is more effective in cases with big L values compared to AVanilla’s random sampling.
2) A-Vanilla vs C-MCTS-S: With parameter values smaller
than P = 10, L = 14, the MCTS seeding is significantly better
than the vanilla version, the difference being most noticed,
again, when the parameter values are small. The decrease in
performance is thought to be caused by the roll-out depth of
MCTS exceeding the optimal range (10 − 12). Across all configurations, MCTS seeding improves the baseline algorithm in
60% of the games for win rate and 80% for score.
Comparing the complete matrix of small parameter values
shows that the population size has a much greater negative
effect on the performance than the individual length. The lack
of impact of the individual length can be explained by the
proportional increase in the roll-out length of MCTS, therefore
keeping results comparable. However, the decrease observed
with population size increase suggests that the algorithm fails
to explore the search space as well as RHEA, therefore
balancing of other parameters should be considered.
For configuration P = 5, L = 10, there are two interesting
games to look in depth at. In the game with index 77 (Sea
Quest), C-MCTS-S increases the win rate of the baseline
algorithm from 31% to 68% (p 0.0001) and the score from
1225.68 average points to 2485.43 (p 0.0001). Another big
effect size is perceived in game 15 (Camel Race), in which,
although the win rates remain small, there is an increase from
2% to 8% (p = 0.026). Both games benefit from the balanced
exploration and exploitation provided by the MCTS solution
which stands at the base of the evolutionary process.
TABLE III
S IGNIFICANCE COMPARISON OF ALGORITHMS A-VANILLA , C-MCTS-S
AND D-MCTS IN ALL 20 GAMES AND ALL CONFIGURATIONS .
Algorithm
A-Vanilla
C-MCTS-S
D-MCTS
Improved
Seeding
1-6
2 (1)
0 (2)
2 (3)
2-8
2 (3)
1 (1)
0 (0)
5-10
2 (3)
0 (3)
0 (1)
10-14
2 (3)
0 (0)
1 (3)
15-16
2 (4)
0 (1)
0 (3)
20-20
2 (4)
0 (1)
0 (3)
Total
3 (4)
1 (7)
3 (7)
10 (15)
4 (10)
2 (4)
0 (5)
2 (5)
0 (4)
10 (15)
3) B-1SLA-S vs C-MCTS-S: When the two seeding techniques are compared, C-MCTS-S achieves a consistently better
performance in 50% of the games for win rate and 65%
for scores, whereas being consistently significantly worse in
games with indices 36 and 91 (Escape and Wait for Breakfast,
respectively) for both win rate and scores and game 50
(Intersection) for score. In game 22 (Chopper), B-1SLA-S with
configuration P = 2, L = 8 achieves a 76% win rate, while
C-MCTS-S increases it to 100% (p 0.0001). In addition,
significant improvements with large effect sizes can also be
noticed in games 60 (Missile Command, p = 0.016) and 84
(Survive Zombies, p = 0.033). However, in the game with
index 36 (Escape), in which the MCTS algorithm cannot find
a solution, the win rate drops from 30% for B-1SLA-S to 0%
for C-MCTS-S (p 0.0001).
C. MCTS Comparison
Although the results indicate algorithm C-MCTS-S to be the
best in this setting, an analysis against a pure Monte Carlo Tree
Search technique was carried out to validate the findings. This
comparison can be seen in Table III, in which the values show
the number of games in which one algorithm was significantly
better than both the others in win rate (and scores, in brackets),
adding up to a total of unique games across all configurations.
The bottom line of Table III signifies the amount of games
in which, although C-MCTS-S was not the best algorithm,
the addition of MCTS seeding to RHEA made it in turn better
than the baseline algorithm. This takes into account the cases
where C-MCTS-S and D-MCTS were not significantly better
than each other, but they still achieved a higher performance
than A-Vanilla.
While A-Vanilla consistently obtains significantly more victories and higher scores in its best games (indices 36, 91 and
50), it must be highlighted that the apparent low performance
of C-MCTS-S is due to it not being significantly better than
D-MCTS. For the direct comparison between C-MCTS-S and
A-Vanilla, the reader is referred to Table II. In this case, the
MCTS seeding variant shows improvement over a wider range
of games, adding up to 50% games in which a larger win rate
was observed and 75% games in which the score increased.
The conclusion emerging is that MCTS seeding has a highly
beneficial effect, especially in low RHEA parameter values,
and further exploration of its advantages is encouraged.
VI. C ONCLUSION
This paper presented an experiment focused on observing
how a better than random population initialization technique
affects the performance of Rolling Horizon Evolutionary Algorithms (RHEA) in General Video Game Playing. Two different
seeding techniques were used for testing. First, a One Step
Look ahead method, which simply carries out an exhaustive
search through all actions available and chooses the best one at
each game step. Second, a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS),
which took half the budget to process the game from the
current state and recommend a solution to serve as a starting
point for the evolutionary process. Experiments were carried
out in a balanced set of 20 games of the General Video Game
AI framework and using various configurations of RHEA
parameters (population size (P ) and individual length (L)).
The results suggest that both seeding variants offer a significant improvement in performance, considering both win rate
and in-game score, in particular when the P and L values are
small. However, as the parameter values increase, the benefit of
seeding decreases, indicating that the unique solution offered
by the initialization methods, which the evolution searches
around, loses value compared to the wider search space at
the disposal of Vanilla RHEA. A conclusion drawn from this
is that the seeding directed evolution should be combined
with better exploration of the game space in order to achieve
optimal results. Nevertheless, as the aim of these algorithms is
to attain a high level of play on all games, a positive result on
a relatively small sample of games negates the null hypothesis
and recommends deeper investigation.
An in-depth comparison between vanilla RHEA, the MCTS
seeding algorithm and Open Loop Monte Carlo Tree Search
was also performed. The findings of this study pinpoint the
fact that, as the evolution parameters increase towards Random
Search, so does the performance of RHEA compared to the
tree search based methods in several games where the search
space is too large for MCTS to traverse efficiently enough.
Furthermore, the MCTS seeding does not produce worse
results than simply MCTS. Therefore, this seeding technique
is shown to have great promise in this environment.
The next steps will be focused on developing the algorithm’s
exploration of the game space, through further use of tree
structures for hybridization, additional roll-outs and circular
buffers. Moreover, a wider range of games will be used to
ascertain that the difference in performance would indeed be
significant in an even more general setting.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was funded by the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral
Training in Intelligent Games and Game Intelligence (IGGI)
EP/L015846/1.
R EFERENCES
[1] A. Babadi, B. Omoomi, and G. Kendall, “EnHiC: An Enforced Hill
Climbing Based System for General Game Playing,” in IEEE Conference
on Computational Intelligence and Games, vol. 1, 2015, pp. 193–199.
[2] C. Chu, H. Hashizume, Z. Guo, T. Harada, and R. Thawonmas,
“Combining Pathfinding Algorithm with Knowledge-based Monte-Carlo
Tree Search in General Video Game Playing,” in IEEE Conference on
Computational Intelligence and Games, vol. 1, 2015, pp. 523–529.
[3] H. Park and K.-J. Kim, “MCTS with Influence Map for General Video
Game Playing,” in IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and
Games (CIG), vol. 1, 2015, pp. 534–535.
Algorithm
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
Game
0
4
13
15
18
22
25
29
36
46
Victories (%)
87.00 (3.36)
97.00 (1.71)
100.00 (0.00)
4.00 (1.96)
4.00 (1.96)
6.00 (2.37)
78.00 (4.14)
90.00 (3.00)
95.00 (2.18)
4.00 (1.96)
3.00 (1.71)
5.00 (2.18)
1.00 (0.99)
2.00 (1.40)
9.00 (2.86)
26.00 (4.39)
48.00 (5.00)
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
2.00 (1.40)
4.00 (1.96)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
15.00 (3.57)
36.00 (4.80)
0.00 (0.00)
2.00 (1.40)
2.00 (1.40)
3.00 (1.71)
Significantly
better than ...
Ø
A
A, B
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
A
A
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
A
A, B
Ø
Ø
A
Ø
Ø
Ø
C
A, C
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Scores
59.33 (1.62)
61.95 (1.29)
68.87 (1.52)
2.10 (0.29)
3.28 (0.51)
3.41 (0.41)
33.12 (1.60)
32.48 (1.65)
30.48 (1.46)
−0.76 (0.05)
−0.77 (0.05)
−0.75 (0.05)
2.16 (0.20)
2.14 (0.22)
3.20 (0.24)
2.39 (0.62)
4.63 (0.78)
16.99 (0.28)
−1.01 (0.01)
−0.89 (0.08)
0.18 (0.10)
5.66 (0.76)
9.15 (0.77)
14.93 (1.17)
−0.64 (0.07)
0.34 (0.05)
0.00 (0.00)
2.00 (1.40)
2.00 (1.40)
4.60 (1.85)
Significantly
better than ...
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
Ø
A
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
A
A, B
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
A
A, B
Ø
A, C
A
Ø
Ø
A, B
Game
49
50
58
60
61
67
75
77
84
91
Victories (%)
98.00 (1.40)
96.00 (1.96)
97.00 (1.71)
79.00 (4.07)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
35.00 (4.77)
36.00 (4.80)
63.00 (4.83)
23.00 (4.21)
28.00 (4.49)
30.00 (4.58)
75.00 (4.33)
70.00 (4.58)
91.00 (2.86)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
33.00 (4.70)
37.00 (4.83)
58.00 (4.94)
23.00 (4.21)
29.00 (4.54)
40.00 (4.90)
35.00 (4.77)
65.00 (4.77)
9.00 (2.86)
Significantly
better than ...
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
A
A
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
Ø
A
C
A, C
Ø
Scores
11.09 (0.61)
11.84 (0.71)
15.25 (0.86)
−3.03 (1.16)
4.25 (0.69)
1.00 (0.00)
−9.11 (0.37)
−0.11 (0.05)
−0.03 (0.02)
1.47 (0.41)
1.72 (0.43)
4.65 (0.48)
0.23 (0.04)
0.28 (0.04)
0.30 (0.05)
35.37 (1.60)
33.05 (1.75)
47.17 (1.87)
1.60 (0.37)
3.54 (0.52)
5.44 (0.62)
903.56 (127.82)
1130.36 (137.78)
1807.79 (177.44)
0.92 (0.38)
0.92 (0.39)
2.27 (0.41)
0.35 (0.05)
0.65 (0.05)
0.09 (0.03)
Significantly
better than ...
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
A, C
A
Ø
A
A
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
A
A
Ø
Ø
A, B
Ø
Ø
A, B
C
A, C
Ø
TABLE IV
P ERCENTAGE OF VICTORIES AND AVERAGE OF SCORE ACHIEVED ( PLUS STANDARD ERROR ) IN 20 DIFFERENT GAMES WITH CONFIGURATION P = 1 AND
L = 6. F OURTH , SIXTH , NINTH AND ELEVENTH COLUMNS INDICATE THE APPROACHES THAT ARE SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE THAN THAT OF THE ROW,
USING THE NON - PARAMETRIC W ILCOXON SIGNED - RANK TEST WITH P - VALUE < 0.05. B OLD FONT FOR THE ALGORITHM THAT IS SIGNIFICANTLY
BETTER THAN ALL THE OTHER 2 IN EITHER VICTORIES OR SCORE .
[4] D. Perez-Liebana, S. Samothrakis, J. Togelius, T. Schaul, S. Lucas,
A. Couetoux, J. Lee, C.-U. Lim, and T. Thompson, “The 2014 General
Video Game Playing Competition,” in IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, vol. PP, no. 99, 2015, p. 1.
[5] R. D. Gaina, D. Perez-Liebana, and S. M. Lucas, “General Video Game
for 2 Players: Framework and Competition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE
Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conf., 2016.
[6] A. Khalifa, D. Perez-Liebana, S. Lucas, and J. T. and, “General Video
Game Level Generation,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), 2016, p. to appear.
[7] D. Silver, A. Huang, C. J. Maddison, A. Guez, L. Sifre, G. van den
Driessche, J. Schrittwieser, I. Antonoglou, V. Panneershelvam, M. Lanctot, S. Dieleman, D. Grewe, J. Nham, N. Kalchbrenner, I. Sutskever,
T. Lillicrap, M. Leach, K. Kavukcuoglu, T. Graepel, and D. Hassabis,
“Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree
Search,” Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, 2016.
[8] K. O. S. Julian Togelius, Georgios N. Yannakakis and C. Browne,
“Search-based Procedural Content Generation: A Taxonomy and Survey,” in IEEE Trans. on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games
(TCIAIG), vol. 3, no. 3, 2011, pp. 172–186.
[9] D. Perez, J. Togelius, S. Samothrakis, P. Rohlfshagen, and S. M.
Lucas, “Automated Map Generation for the Physical Traveling Salesman
Problem,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 18,
no. 5, pp. 708–720, Oct 2014.
[10] D. Perez-Liebana, S. Samothrakis, S. M. Lucas, and P. Rolfshagen,
“Rolling Horizon Evolution versus Tree Search for Navigation in
Single-Player Real-Time Games,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and
Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), 2013, pp. 351–358.
[11] J. Liu, D. Perez-Liebana, and S. M. Lucas, “Rolling Horizon Coevolutionary Planning for Two-Player Video Games,” in Proceedings of the
IEEE Conf. on Computational intelligence and Games, 2016.
[12] D. Perez, S. Samothrakis, and S. M. Lucas, “Knowledge-based Fast Evolutionary MCTS for General Video Game Playing,” in IEEE Conference
on Computational Intelligence and Games, 2014, pp. 1–8.
[13] S. M. Lucas, S. Samothrakis, and D. Perez, “Fast Evolutionary Adaptation for Monte Carlo Tree Search,” in EvoGames, 2014.
[14] J. Liu, D. Perez-Liebana, and S. M. Lucas, “Bandit-Based Random
Mutation Hill-Climbing,” CoRR, vol. abs/1606.06041, 2016. [Online].
Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06041
[15] B. Kazimipour, X. Li, and A. K. Qin, “A Review of Population Initialization Techniques for Evolutionary Algorithms,” in IEEE Congress on
Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2014.
[16] K. J. Kim, H. Choi, and S. B. Cho, “Hybrid of Evolution and Reinforcement Learning for Othello Players,” in 2007 IEEE Symposium on
Computational Intelligence and Games, April 2007, pp. 203–209.
[17] H. Maaranen, K. Miettinen, and M. Mäkelä, “Quasi-Random Initial
Population for Genetic Algorithms,” Computers and Mathematics with
Applications, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1885–1895, 2004.
[18] C. Browne, E. Powley, D. Whitehouse, S. Lucas, P. Cowling, P. Rohlfshagen, S. Tavener, D. Perez, S. Samothrakis, and S. Colton, “A Survey
of Monte Carlo Tree Search Methods,” in IEEE Trans. on Computational
Intelligence and AI in Games, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1–43.
[19] M. G. Bellemare, Y. Naddaf, J. Veness, and M. Bowling, “The Arcade
Learning Environment: An Evaluation Platform for General Agents,”
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 47, pp. 253–279, 2013.
[20] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G.
Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski,
S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran,
D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis, “Human-level Control Through
Deep Reinforcement Learning,” Nature, vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529–533,
2015.
[21] M. J. Nelson, “Investigating Vanilla MCTS Scaling on the GVGAI Game Corpus,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on
Computational Intelligence and Games, 2016.
[22] P. Bontrager, A. Khalifa, A. Mendes, and J. Togelius, “Matching Games
and Algorithms for General Video Game Playing,” in 12 Artificial
Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference, 2016, pp.
122–128.
[23] R. D. Gaina, J. Liu, S. M. Lucas, and D. P. Liébana, “Analysis of Vanilla
Rolling Horizon Evolution Parameters in General Video Game Playing,”
in Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, EvoApplications, 2017.
Game
0
4
13
15
18
22
25
29
36
46
49
50
58
60
61
67
75
77
84
91
Total
Algorithm
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
A-Vanilla
B-1SLA-S
C-MCTS-S
P = 1, L = 6
87.00 (3.36)
97.00 (1.71)
100.00 (0.00)
4.00 (1.96)
4.00 (1.96)
6.00 (2.37)
78.00 (4.14)
90.00 (3.00)
95.00 (2.18)
4.00 (1.96)
3.00 (1.71)
5.00 (2.18)
1.00 (0.99)
2.00 (1.40)
9.00 (2.86)
26.00 (4.39)
48.00 (5.00)
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
2.00 (1.40)
4.00 (1.96)*
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)*
15.00 (3.57)
36.00 (4.80)
0.00 (0.00)
2.00 (1.40)
2.00 (1.40)
3.00 (1.71)*
98.00 (1.40)
96.00 (1.96)
97.00 (1.71)*
79.00 (4.07)
100.00 (0.00)*
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
35.00 (4.77)
36.00 (4.80)
63.00 (4.83)
23.00 (4.21)
28.00 (4.49)
30.00 (4.58)
75.00 (4.33)
70.00 (4.58)
91.00 (2.86)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
33.00 (4.70)
37.00 (4.83)
58.00 (4.94)
23.00 (4.21)
29.00 (4.54)
40.00 (4.90)*
35.00 (4.77)
65.00 (4.77)
9.00 (2.86)
0 (0)
2 (3)
6 (11)
P = 2, L = 8
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)*
5.00 (2.18)
5.00 (2.18)
6.00 (2.37)
83.00 (3.76)
90.00 (3.00)
99.00 (0.99)
7.00 (2.55)
3.00 (1.71)
5.00 (2.18)
2.00 (1.40)
4.00 (1.96)
12.00 (3.25)
74.00 (4.39)
76.00 (4.27)
100.00 (0.00)
2.00 (1.40)
3.00 (1.71)
1.00 (0.99)*
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)*
32.00 (4.66)
30.00 (4.58)*
0.00 (0.00)
4.00 (1.96)
0.00 (0.00)
5.00 (2.18)
98.00 (1.40)
97.00 (1.71)
100.00 (0.00)*
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)*
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
46.00 (4.98)
47.00 (4.99)
62.00 (4.85)
26.00 (4.39)
22.00 (4.14)
25.00 (4.33)
79.00 (4.07)
72.00 (4.49)
89.00 (3.13)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)*
42.00 (4.94)
44.00 (4.96)
51.00 (5.00)
39.00 (4.88)
39.00 (4.88)
52.00 (5.00)
65.00 (4.77)
65.00 (4.77)
11.00 (3.13)
0 (0)
0 (2)
6 (10)
P = 5, L = 10
P = 10, L = 14
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)*
100.00 (0.00)*
9.00 (2.86)
8.00 (2.71)
4.00 (1.96)
5.00 (2.18)
7.00 (2.55)
7.00 (2.55)
94.00 (2.37)
96.00 (1.96)
90.00 (3.00)
87.00 (3.36)
100.00 (0.00)
99.00 (0.99)
2.00 (1.40)
7.00 (2.55)
3.00 (1.71)
7.00 (2.55)
8.00 (2.71)
5.00 (2.18)
7.00 (2.55)
6.00 (2.37)
4.00 (1.96)
1.00 (0.99)
8.00 (2.71)*
11.00 (3.13)
95.00 (2.18)
99.00 (0.99)
72.00 (4.49)
33.00 (4.70)
100.00 (0.00)
99.00 (0.99)*
2.00 (1.40)
7.00 (2.55)
4.00 (1.96)
4.00 (1.96)
2.00 (1.40)*
0.00 (0.00)*
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
33.00 (4.70)
44.00 (4.96)
33.00 (4.70)
31.00 (4.62)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
3.00 (1.71)
1.00 (0.99)
4.00 (1.96)
2.00 (1.40)
4.00 (1.96)
6.00 (2.37)
96.00 (1.96)
98.00 (1.40)
97.00 (1.71)
98.00 (1.40)
94.00 (2.37)*
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)*
100.00 (0.00)*
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)*
0.00 (0.00)*
0.00 (0.00)
51.00 (5.00)
57.00 (4.95)
49.00 (5.00)
39.00 (4.88)
59.00 (4.92)
67.00 (4.70)
28.00 (4.49)
26.00 (4.39)
23.00 (4.21)
25.00 (4.33)
26.00 (4.39)
28.00 (4.49)
89.00 (3.13)
96.00 (1.96)
85.00 (3.57)
89.00 (3.13)
83.00 (3.76)
85.00 (3.57)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
31.00 (4.62)
44.00 (4.96)
48.00 (5.00)
34.00 (4.74)
68.00 (4.66)
50.00 (5.00)
43.00 (4.95)
40.00 (4.90)
32.00 (4.66)
29.00 (4.54)
49.00 (5.00)
41.00 (4.92)*
68.00 (4.66)
76.00 (4.27)
59.00 (4.92)
72.00 (4.49)
29.00 (4.54)
21.00 (4.07)
0 (0)
2 (0)
0 (1)
0 (2)
3 (7)
0 (5)
TABLE V
P = 15, L = 16
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)*
11.00 (3.13)
10.00 (3.00)
5.00 (2.18)
91.00 (2.86)
84.00 (3.67)
98.00 (1.40)
5.00 (2.18)
7.00 (2.55)
4.00 (1.96)
8.00 (2.71)
4.00 (1.96)
11.00 (3.13)*
97.00 (1.71)
24.00 (4.27)
100.00 (0.00)
9.00 (2.86)
3.00 (1.71)
5.00 (2.18)*
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
42.00 (4.94)
33.00 (4.70)
0.00 (0.00)
3.00 (1.71)
1.00 (0.99)
7.00 (2.55)
96.00 (1.96)
97.00 (1.71)
97.00 (1.71)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)*
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)*
0.00 (0.00)
58.00 (4.94)
43.00 (4.95)
69.00 (4.62)
29.00 (4.54)
21.00 (4.07)
24.00 (4.27)
92.00 (2.71)
83.00 (3.76)
91.00 (2.86)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
58.00 (4.94)
52.00 (5.00)
56.00 (4.96)
45.00 (4.97)
33.00 (4.70)
43.00 (4.95)
71.00 (4.54)
65.00 (4.77)
24.00 (4.27)
0 (0)
0 (2)
2 (4)
P = 20, L = 20
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)*
5.00 (2.18)
5.00 (2.18)
6.00 (2.37)
92.00 (2.71)
87.00 (3.36)
97.00 (1.71)
7.00 (2.55)
2.00 (1.40)
5.00 (2.18)
6.00 (2.37)
3.00 (1.71)
11.00 (3.13)
98.00 (1.40)
13.00 (3.36)
99.00 (0.99)*
8.00 (2.71)
6.00 (2.37)
3.00 (1.71)*
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
39.00 (4.88)
37.00 (4.83)
1.00 (0.99)
3.00 (1.71)
1.00 (0.99)
4.00 (1.96)
98.00 (1.40)
99.00 (0.99)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)*
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)*
0.00 (0.00)
59.00 (4.92)
43.00 (4.95)
64.00 (4.80)
31.00 (4.62)
32.00 (4.66)
26.00 (4.39)
96.00 (1.96)*
82.00 (3.84)
97.00 (1.71)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)*
59.00 (4.92)
43.00 (4.95)
63.00 (4.83)
49.00 (5.00)
39.00 (4.88)
45.00 (4.97)
72.00 (4.49)
69.00 (4.62)
11.00 (3.13)
0 (1)
0 (2)
0 (4)
Total
97.83 (2.16)
99.50 (0.50)
100.00 (0.00)
7.00 (1.12)
5.5 (1.88)
6.16 (0.33)
89.00 (2.94)
88.00 (1.04)
98.00 (0.76)
5.33 (0.77)
4.16 (0.83)
5.33 (0.68)
5.00 (1.33)
3.00 (0.61)
10.33 (1.28)
81.5 (11.74)
44.33 (8.43)
99.67 (0.16)
4.67 (1.39)
3.67 (0.33)
2.50 (0.76)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
34.16 (4.56)
33.33 (1.11)
0.16 (0.16)
2.67 (0.42)
1.67 (0.53)
4.83 (0.57)
97.33 (0.57)
97.33 (0.33)
98.00 (1.00)
96.50 (3.50)
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
51.16 (3.51)
42.83 (2.02)
64.00 (1.60)
27.16 (0.87)
25.16 (1.02)
26.50 (0.88)
87.83 (3.24)
80.16 (3.27)
89.33 (1.32)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
0.00 (0.00)
44.50 (4.16)
43.00 (2.90)
57.67 (2.69)
39.83 (4.15)
33.50 (1.68)
45.00 (1.92)
64.50 (6.05)
65.83 (2.12)
17.50 (3.13)
2 (1)
2 (4)
8 (13)
AVERAGE OF VICTORIES IN ALL 20 GAMES . B OLD STYLE INDICATES THAT THE ALGORITHM IS SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER IN THAT GAME THAN THE
OTHER TWO SEEDING VARIANTS , REGARDING AVERAGE VICTORIES . * SYMBOL INDICATES THAT THE ALGORITHM IS SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER IN THAT
GAME THAN THE OTHER TWO SEEDING VARIANTS , REGARDING AVERAGE GAME SCORE . T HE BOTTOM OF THE TABLE ADDS UP THE NUMBER OF GAMES
IN WHICH THE ALGORITHM WAS SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER THAN THE OTHER TWO VARIANTS IN AVERAGE VICTORIES AND AVERAGE SCORES IN
BRACKETS . T HE NON - PARAMETRIC W ILCOXON SIGNED - RANK TEST WITH P - VALUE < 0.05 WAS USED TO DETERMINE SIGNIFICANCE .
| 9cs.NE
|
Which Distribution Distances are Sublinearly Testable?
arXiv:1708.00002v2 [cs.DS] 31 Oct 2017
Constantinos Daskalakis∗
EECS & CSAIL, MIT
[email protected]
Gautam Kamath†
EECS & CSAIL, MIT
[email protected]
John Wright‡
Physics, MIT
[email protected]
November 1, 2017
Abstract
Given samples from an unknown distribution p and a description of a distribution q, are p and q close
or far? This question of “identity testing” has received significant attention in the case of testing whether
p and q are equal or far in total variation distance. However, in recent work [VV11a, ADK15, DP17], the
following questions have been been critical to solving problems at the frontiers of distribution testing:
• Alternative Distances: Can we test whether p and q are far in other distances, say Hellinger?
• Tolerance: Can we test when p and q are close, rather than equal? And if so, close in which
distances?
Motivated by these questions, we characterize the complexity of distribution testing under a variety
of distances, including total variation, ℓ2 , Hellinger, Kullback-Leibler, and χ2 . For each pair of distances
d1 and d2 , we study the complexity of testing if p and q are close in d1 versus far in d2 , with a focus on
identifying which problems allow strongly sublinear testers (i.e., those with complexity O(n1−γ ) for some
γ > 0 where n is the size of the support of the distributions p and q). We provide matching upper and
lower bounds for each case. We also study these questions in the case where we only have samples from q
(equivalence testing), showing qualitative differences from identity testing in terms of when tolerance can
be achieved. Our algorithms fall into the classical paradigm of χ2 -statistics, but require crucial changes
to handle the challenges introduced by each distance we consider. Finally, we survey other recent results
in an attempt to serve as a reference for the complexity of various distribution testing problems.
1
Introduction
The arch problem in science is determining whether observations of some phenomenon conform to a conjectured model. Often, phenomena of interest are probabilistic in nature, and so are our models of these
phenomena; hence, testing their validity becomes a statistical hypothesis testing problem. In mathematical
notation, suppose that we have access to samples from some unknown distribution p over some set Σ of
size n. We also have a hypothesis distribution q, and our goal is to distinguish whether p = q or p 6= q.
For instance, we may want to test whether the sizes of some population of insects are normally distributed
around their mean by sampling insects and measuring their sizes.
Of course, our models are usually imperfect. In our insect example, perhaps our estimation of the mean
and variance of the insect sizes is a bit off. Furthermore, the sizes will clearly always be positive numbers.
Yet a Normal distribution could still be a good fit. To get a meaningful testing problem some slack may
be introduced, turning the problem into that of distinguishing whether d1 (p, q) ≤ ε1 versus d2 (p, q) ≥ ε2 ,
for some distance measures d1 (·, ·) and d2 (·, ·) between distributions over Σ and some choice of ε1 and ε2
which may potentially depend on Σ or even q. Regardless, for the problem to be well-defined, the sets of
distributions C = {p | d1 (p, q) ≤ ε1 } and F = {p | d2 (p, q) ≥ ε2 } should be disjoint. In fact, as our goal is
to distinguish between p ∈ C and p ∈ F from samples, we cannot possibly draw the right conclusion with
∗ Supported
by NSF CCF-1617730, CCF-1650733, and ONR N00014-12-1-0999.
by NSF CCF-1617730, CCF-1650733, and ONR N00014-12-1-0999. Part of this work was done while the author
was an intern at Microsoft Research New England.
‡ Supported by NSF grant CCF-6931885.
† Supported
1
probability 1 or detect the most minute deviations of p from C or F . So our guarantee should be probabilistic,
and there should be some “gap” between the sets C and F . In sum, the problem is the following:
(d1 , d2 )-Identity Testing: Given an explicit description of a distribution q over Σ, sample access to a
distribution p over Σ, and bounds ε1 ≥ 0, and ε2 , δ > 0, distinguish with probability at least 1 − δ
between d1 (p, q) ≤ ε1 and d2 (p, q) ≥ ε2 , whenever p satisfies one of these two inequalities.
A related problem is when we have sample access to both p and q. For example, we might be interested
in whether two populations of insects have distributions that are close or far. The resulting problem is the
following:
(d1 , d2 )-Equivalence (or Closeness) Testing: Given sample access to distributions p and q over Σ, and
bounds ε1 ≥ 0, and ε2 , δ > 0, distinguish with probability at least 1 − δ between d1 (p, q) ≤ ε1 and
d2 (p, q) ≥ ε2 , whenever p, q satisfy one of these two inequalities.
The above questions are of course fundamental, and widely studied since the beginning of statistics.
However, most tests only detect certain types of deviations of p from q, or are designed for distributions
in parametric families. Moreover, most of the emphasis has been on the asymptotic sample regime. To
address these challenges, there has been a surge of recent interest in information theory, property testing,
and sublinear-time algorithms aiming at finite sample and d1 -close vs. d2 -far distinguishers, as in the
formulations above; see e.g. [BFF+ 01, BKR04, Pan08, VV17, ADK15, CDGR16, DK16]. This line of work
has culminated in computationally efficient and sample optimal testers for several choices of distances d1
and d2 , as well as error parameters ε1 and ε2 , for example:
• for identity testing, when:
– d2 is taken to be the total variation distance, and ε1 = 0 [BFF+ 01, Pan08, VV17];
– d1 is taken to be the χ2 -divergence, d2 is taken to be the total variation distance, and ε1 =
(ε2 )2 /4 [ADK15, DK16];
• for equivalence testing, when d2 is taken to be the total variation distance, and ε1 = 0 [BFR+ 13, Val11,
CDVV14].
There are also several other sub-optimal results known for other combinations of d1 , d2 , ε1 and ε2 , and for
many combinations there are no known testers. A more extensive discussion of the literature is provided in
Section 1.2.
The goal of this paper is to provide a complete mapping of the optimal sample complexity required to
obtain computationally efficient testers for identity testing and equivalence testing under the most commonly
used notions of distances d1 and d2 . Our results are summarized in Tables 1, 2, and 3 and discussed in detail
in Section 1.1. In particular, we obtain computationally efficient and sample optimal testers for distances
d1 and d2 ranging in the set {ℓ2 -distance, total variation distance, Hellinger distance, Kullback-Leibler
divergence, χ2 -divergence},1 and for combinations of these distances and choice of errors ε1 and ε2 which
give rise to meaningful testing problems as discussed above. The sample complexities stated in the tables
are for probability of error 1/3. Throwing in extra factors of O(log 1/δ) boosts the probability of error to
1 − δ, as usual.2
Our motivation for this work is primarily the fundamental nature of identity and equivalence testing,
as well as of the distances under which we study these problems. It is also the fact that, even though
distribution testing is by now a mature subfield of information theory, property testing, and sublinear-time
algorithms, several of the testing questions that we consider have had unknown statuses prior to our work.
This gap is accentuated by the fact that, as we establish, closely related distances may have radically different
behavior. To give a quick example, it is easy to see that χ2 -divergence is the second-order Taylor expansion
of KL-divergence. Yet, as we show, the sample complexity for identity testing changes radically when d2
is taken to be total variation or Hellinger distance, and d1 transitions from χ2 to KL or weaker distances;
1 These
distances are nicely nested, as discussed in Section 2, from the weaker ℓ2 to the stronger χ2 -divergence.
one can repeat the test O(log 1/δ) times and output the majority result. One can analyze the resulting probability
of success by the Chernoff bound.
2 Namely,
2
see Table 1. Prior to this work we knew about a transition somewhere between χ2 -divergence and total
variation distance, but our work identifies a more refined understanding of the point of transition. Similar
fragility phenomena are identified by our work for equivalence testing, when we switch from total variation
to Hellinger distance, as seen in Tables 2 and 3.
Adding to the fundamental nature of the problems we consider here, we should also emphasize that
a clear understanding of the different tradeoffs mapped out by our work is critical at this point for the
further development of the distribution testing field, as recent experience has established. Let us provide a
couple of recent examples, drawing from our prior work. Acharya, Daskalakis, and Kamath [ADK15] study
whether properties of distributions, such as unimodality or log-concavity, can be tested in total variation
distance. Namely, given sample access to a distribution p, how many samples are needed to test whether
it has some property (modeled by a set P of distributions) or whether it is far from having the property,
i.e. dTV (p, P) > ε, for some error ε? Their approach is to first learn a proxy distribution p̂ ∈ P that
satisfies d′ (p, p̂) ≤ ε′ for some distance d′ , whenever p ∈ P, then reduce the property testing problem to
(d′ , dTV )-identity testing of p to p̂. Interestingly, rather than picking d′ to be total variation
distance, they
√
take it to be χ2 -divergence, which leads to optimal testers of sample complexity O( n/ε2 ) for several P’s
such as monotone, unimodal, and log-concave distributions over [n]. Had they picked d′ to be total variation
distance, they would be stuck with a Ω(n/ log n) sample complexity in the resulting identity testing problem,
as Table 1 illustrates, which would lead to a suboptimal overall tester. The choice of χ2 -divergence in the
work of Acharya et al. was somewhat ad hoc. By providing a full mapping of the sample complexity tradeoffs
in the use of different distances, we expect to help future work in identifying better where the bottlenecks
and opportunities lie.
Another example supporting our expectation can be found in recent work of Daskalakis and Pan [DP17].
They study equivalence testing of Bayesian networks under total variation distance. Bayesian networks are
flexible models expressing combinatorial structure in high-dimensional distributions in terms of a directed
acyclic graph (DAG) specifying their conditional dependence structure. The challenge in testing Bayes nets
is that their support scales exponentially in the number of nodes, and hence naive applications of known
equivalence tests lead to sample complexities that are exponential in the number of nodes, even when the
in-degree δ of the underlying DAGs is bounded. To address this challenge, Daskalakis and Pan establish
“localization-of-distance” results of the following form, for various choices of distance d: “If two Bayes nets
P and Q are ε-far in total variation distance, then there exists a small set of nodes S (whose size is ∆ + 1,
where ∆ is again the maximum in-degree of the underlying DAG where P and Q are defined) such that
the marginal distributions of P and Q over the nodes of set S are ε′ -far under distance d.” When they
take d to be total variation distance, they can show ε′ = Ω(ε/m), where m is the number of nodes in the
underlying DAG (i.e. the dimension). Given this localization of distance, to test whether two Bayes nets P
and Q satisfy P = Q vs. dTV (P, Q) ≥ ε, it suffices to test, for all relevant marginals PS and QS whether
PS = QS vs. dTV (PS , QS ) = Ω(ε/m). From Table 2 it follows that this requires sample size superlinear in m,
which is suboptimal. Interestingly, when they take d to be the square Hellinger distance, they can establish
a localization-of-distance result with ε′ = ε2 /2m. By Table 2, to test each S they need sample complexity
that is linear in m, leading to an overall dependence of the sample complexity on m that is Õ(m),3 which
is optimal up to log factors. Again, switching to a different distance results in near-optimal overall sample
complexity, and our table is guidance as to where the bottlenecks and opportunities lie.
Finally, we comment that tolerant testing (i.e., when ε1 > 0) is perhaps one of the most interesting
questions in the design of practically useful testers. Indeed, as mentioned before, in many statistical settings
there may be model misspecification. For example, why should one expect to be receiving samples from
precisely the uniform distribution? As such, one may desire that a tester is robust to small errors, and
accepts all distributions which are close to uniform. Unfortunately, Valiant and Valiant [VV11a] ruled out
the possibility
ofa strongly sublinear tester which has total variation tolerance, showing that such a problem
requires Θ logn n samples. However, as shown by Acharya, Daskalakis, and Kamath [ADK15], χ2 -tolerance
√
is possible with only O ε2n samples. This raises the following question: Which distances can a tester be
tolerant to, while maintaining a strongly sublinear sample complexity? We outline what is possible.
3 The
extra log factors are to guarantee that the tests performed on all sets S of size δ + 1 succeed.
3
dTV (p, q) ≥ ε
√
Ω ε2n [Pan08]
p=q
dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 /4
dKL (p, q) ≤ ε2 /4
√
dH (p, q) ≤ ε/2 2
Ω
n
log n
√
dH (p, q) ≥ ε/ 2
O
[Theorem 8]
dTV (p, q) ≤ ε/2 or ε2 /45
O
√
n
ε2
n
log n
dKL (p, q) ≥ ε2
Untestable [Theorem 7]
dχ2 (p, q) ≥ ε2
[Theorem 1]
[Corollary 3]
Table 1: Identity Testing. Rows correspond to completeness of the tester, and columns correspond to
soundness.
p=q
dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 /4
dKL (p, q) ≤ ε2 /4
√
dH (p, q) ≤ ε/2 2
dTV (p, q) ≤ ε/2 or ε2 /45
d (p, q) ≥ ε
o
n TV
1/2
2/3
O max nε2 , nε4/3 [CDVV14]
n 1/2 2/3 o
Ω max nε2 , nε4/3 [CDVV14]
Ω logn n [Theorem 9]
√
d (p, q) ≥ ε/ 2
n H3/4 2/3 o
O min nε2 , nε8/3 [Theorem 5]
n 3/4 2/3 o
[DK16]
Ω min nε2 , nε8/3
O
n
log n
dKL (p, q) ≥ ε2
Untestable [Theorem 7]
dχ2 (p, q) ≥ ε2
[Corollary 3]
Table 2: Equivalence Testing. Rows correspond to completeness of the tester, and columns correspond to
soundness.
1.1
Results
Our results are pictorially presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3. We note that these tables are intended to provide
only references to the sample complexity of each testing problem, rather than exhaustively cover all prior
work. As such, several references are deferred to Section 1.2. In Tables 1 and 2, each cell contains the
complexity of testing whether two distributions are close in the distance for that row, versus far in the
distance for that column.4 These distances and their relationships are covered in detail in Section 2, but
we note that the distances are scaled and transformed such that problems become harder as we traverse the
table down or to the right. In other words, lower bounds hold for cells which are down or to the right in
the table, and upper bounds hold for cells which are up or to the left; problems with the same complexity
are shaded with the same color. The dark grey boxes indicate problems which are not well-defined, i.e. two
distributions could simultaneously be close in KL and far in χ2 -divergence.
We highlight some of our results:
√
√
1. We give an O( n/ε2 ) sample algorithm for identity testing whether dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 /4 or dH (p, q) ≥ ε/ 2
(Theorem 1). This is the first algorithm which achieves the optimal dependence on both n and
√ ε for
identity testing with respect to Hellinger distance (even non-tolerantly). We note that a O( n/ε4 )
algorithm was known, due to optimal identity testers for total variation distance and the quadratic
relationship between total variation and Hellinger distance.
2. In the case of identity testing, a stronger form of tolerance (i.e., KL divergence instead of χ2 ) causes the
sample complexity to jump to Ω (n/ log n) (Theorem 8). We find this a bit surprising, as χ2 -divergence
is the second-order Taylor expansion of KL divergence, so one might expect that the testing problems
have comparable complexities.
3. In the case of equivalence testing, even χ2 -tolerance comes at the cost of an Ω (n/ log n) sample complexity (Theorem 9). This is a qualitative difference from identity testing, where χ2 -tolerance came at
no cost.
4 Note that we chose constants in our theorem statements for simplicity of presentation, and they may not match the
constants presented in the table. This can be remedied by appropriate changing of constants in the algorithms and constant
factor increases in the sample complexity.
5 We note that we must use ε/2 or ε2 /4 depending on whether we are testing with respect to TV or Hellinger. For more
details and other discussion of the n/ log n region of this chart, see Section 1.1.2.
4
d(p, q) ≤ fd (n, ε) vs. dℓ2 (p, q) ≥ ε
dℓ2 (p, q) ≤
dℓ2 (p, q) ≤
√ε
n
2
ε
√
n
vs. dTV (p, q) ≥ ε
vs. dH (p, q) ≥ ε
Identity Testing
Θ ε12 [Corollary 2]
√
Θ ε2n [Theorem 2]
√
Θ ε2n [Theorem 3]
Equivalence Testing
Θ ε12 [Corollary 2]
n 1/2 2/3 o
Θ max nε2 , nε4/3
[Theorem 4]
n 3/4 2/3 o
Θ min nε2 , nε8/3 [Theorem 5]
Table 3: ℓ2 Testing. fd (n, ε) is a quantity such that d(p, q) ≤ fd (n, ε) and dℓ2 (p, q) ≥ ε are disjoint.
4. However, in both identity and equivalence testing, ℓ2 tolerance comes at no additional cost (Theorems 2,
3, 4, and 5). Thus, in many cases, ℓ2 tolerance is the best one can do if one wishes to maintain a strongly
sublinear sample complexity.
From a technical standpoint, our algorithms are χ2 -statistical tests, and most closely resemble those
of [ADK15] and [CDVV14] (similar χ2 -tests were employed in [VV17, DKN15, CDGR16]). However, crucial
changes are required to satisfy the more stringent requirements of testing with respect to Hellinger distance.
In our identity tester for Hellinger, we deal with this different distance measure by pruning light domain
elements of q less aggressively than [ADK15], in combination with a preliminary test to reject early if the
difference between p and q is contained exclusively within the set of light elements – this is a new issue that
cannot arise when testing with respect to total variation distance. In our equivalence tester for Hellinger,
we follow an approach, similar to [CDVV14] and [DK16], of analyzing the light and heavy domain elements
separately, with the challenge that the algorithm does not know which elements are which. Finally, to
achieve ℓ2 tolerance in these cases, we use a “mixing” strategy in which instead of testing based solely on
samples from p and q, we mix in some number (depending on our application) of samples from the uniform
distribution. At a high level, the purpose of mixing is to make our distributions well-conditioned, i.e. to
ensure that all probability values are sufficiently large. Such a strategy was recently employed by Goldreich
in [Gol16] for uniformity testing.
1.1.1
Comments on ℓ2 -tolerance
ℓ2 tolerance has been indirectly considered in [GR00, BFF+ 01, BFR+ 13] through their weak tolerance for
total variation distance and the relationship with ℓ2 distance, though these results have suboptimal sample
complexity. Our equivalence testing results improve upon [CDVV14] by adding ℓ2 -tolerance. We note
that [DK16] also provides ℓ2 -tolerant testers (as well as [DKN15] for the case of uniformity), comparable to
those obtained in Theorems 2, 3, and 5, though this tolerance is not explicitly analyzed in their paper. This
can be seen by noting that the underlying tester from [CDVV14] is tolerant, and the “flattening” operation
they apply reduces the ℓ2 -distance between the distributions. The testers in [DK16] are those of Propositions
2.7, 2.10, and 2.15, combined with the observation of Remark 2.8. We rederive these results for completeness,
and to show a direct way of proving ℓ2 -tolerance. Note that Theorem 5 also improves upon Proposition 2.15
of [DK16] by removing log factors in the sample complexity.
1.1.2
Comments on the Θ(n/ log n) Results
Our upper bounds in the bottom-left portion of the table are based off the total variation distance estimation
algorithm of Jiao, Han, and Weissman [JHW16], where an Θ(n/ log n) complexity is only derived for ε ≥
1/ poly(n). Similarly, in [VV10a], the lower bounds are only valid for constant ε. We believe that the precise
characterization is a very interesting open problem. In the present work, we focus on the case of constant ε
for these testing problems.
We wish to draw attention to the bottom row of the table, and note that the√two testing problems are
dTV (p, q) ≤ ε/2 versus dTV (p, q) ≥ ε, and dTV (p, q) ≤ ε2 /4 versus dH (p, q) ≥ ε/ 2. This difference in parameterization is required to make the two cases in the testing problem disjoint. With this parameterization,
we conjecture that the latter problem has a greater dependence on ε as it goes to 0 (namely, ε−4 versus ε−2 ),
so we colour the box a slightly darker shade of orange.
5
1.2
Related Work
The most classic distribution testing question is uniformity testing, which is identity testing when ε1 = 0, d2
is total variation distance, and q is the uniform distribution. This was first studied in theoretical computer
science
√ in [GR00]. Paninski gave an optimal algorithm (for when ε2 is not too small) with a complexity
of O( n/ε2 ) and a matching lower bound [Pan08]. More generally, letting q be an arbitrary distribution,
exact total variation identity testing was studied [BFF+ 01], and
√ an (instance) optimal algorithm was given
by Valiant and Valiant [VV17], with the same complexity of O( n/ε2 ). Optimal algorithms for this problem
were rediscovered several times, see i.e. [DKN15, ADK15, DK16, DGPP16].
Equivalence (or closeness) testing was studied in [BFR+ 13], in the same setting (ε1 = 0, d2 is total
variation distance). A lower bound of Ω(n2/3 ) was given by [Val11]. Tight upper and lower bounds were
given in [CDVV14], which shows interesting behavior of the sample complexity as the parameter ε goes from
large to small. This problem was also studied in the setting where one has unequal sample sizes from the
two distributions [BV15, DK16]. When the distance d1 is Hellinger, the complexity is qualitatively different,
as shown by [DK16]. They prove a nearly-optimal upper bound and a tight lower bound for this problem.
[Wag15, DBNNR11] also consider testing problems with other distances, namely ℓp distances and earth
mover’s distance (also known as Wasserstein distance), respectively.
Tolerant identity testing (where ε1 = O(ε) and d1 is total variation distance) was studied in [VV10a,
VV10b, VV11a, VV11b], through the (equivalent) lens of estimating total variation distance between distributions. In these works, Θ (n/ log n) bounds were proven for the sample complexity. Several other related
problems (i.e., support size and entropy estimation) share the same sample complexity, and have enjoyed
significant study [AOST17, WY16, ADOS17]. The closest related results to our work are those on estimating
distances between distributions [JHW16, JVHW17, HJW16].
χ2 -tolerance (when d1 is χ2 -divergence and ε1 = O(ε2 )) was introduced and applied by [ADK15] for
testing families of distributions, i.e., testing if a distribution is monotone or far from being monotone. It
was shown that this tolerance
comes at no additional cost over vanilla identity testing; that is, the sample
√
complexity is still O( n/ε2 ). Testing such families of distributions was also studied by [CDGR16].
Testing with respect to Hellinger distance was applied in [DP17] for testing Bayes networks. Since lower
bounds of [ADK15] show that distribution testing suffers from the curse of dimensionality, further structural
assumptions must be made if one wishes to test multivariate distributions. This “high-dimensional frontier”
has also been studied on graphical models by [DDK18] and [CDKS17] (for Ising models and Bayesian
networks, respectively).
Our work focuses on characterizing the complexity of identity and equivalence testing in the worst case
over pairs p and q. Related works attempt to nail down the sample complexity of identity testing on
an instance-by-instance basis [VV17, JHW16, DK16, BCG17] – that is, reducing the sample complexity
depending on which distribution q is given as input (and sometimes depending on p as well). We consider
this to be an interesting open question for different distances d1 and d2 . For example, Theorem 7 states that
identity testing is impossible
√ when d2 is the KL divergence. However, if q is the uniform distribution, then
the complexity becomes Θ( n). An instance-by-instance analysis would allow one to bypass some of these
strong lower bounds.
This is only a fraction of recent results; we direct the reader to [Can15] for an excellent recent survey of
distribution testing.
1.3
Organization
The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we state preliminaries and notation used in this
paper. In Sections 3 and 4, we prove upper bounds for identity testing and equivalence testing (respectively)
based on χ2 -style statistics. In Section 5, we prove upper bounds for distribution testing based on distance
estimation. Finally, in Section 6, we prove testing lower bounds.
2
Preliminaries
In this paper, we will focus on discrete probability distributions over [n]. For a distribution p, we will use
the notation pi to denote the mass p places on symbol i. For a set S ⊆ [n] and a distribution p over [n], pS
6
is the vector p restricted to the coordinates in S. We will call this a restriction of distribution p.
The following probability distances and divergences are of interest to us:
Definition 1. The total variation distance between p and q is defined as
dTV (p, q) = max p(S) − q(S) =
S⊆[n]
1 X
|pi − qi | = kp − qk1 ∈ [0, 1].
2
i∈[n]
Definition 2. The KL divergence between p and q is defined as
X
pi
pi log
dKL (p, q) =
∈ [0, ∞).
qi
i∈[n]
This definition uses the convention that 0 log 0 = 0.
Definition 3. The Hellinger distance between p and q is defined as
sX
1
√
√ 2
dH (p, q) = √
( pi − qi ) ∈ [0, 1].
2 i∈[n]
Definition 4. The χ2 -divergence (or chi-squared divergence) between p and q is defined as
dχ2 (p, q) =
X (pi − qi )2
∈ [0, ∞).
qi
i∈[n]
Definition 5. The ℓ2 distance between p and q is defined as
sX
(pi − qi )2 = kp − qk2 ∈ [0, 1].
dℓ2 (p, q) =
i∈[n]
We also define these distances for restrictions of distributions pS and qS by replacing the summations over
i ∈ [n] with summations over i ∈ S.
We have the following relationships between these distances. These are well-known for distributions, i.e.,
see [GS02], but we prove them more generally for restrictions of distributions in Section A.
Proposition 1. Letting pS and qS be restrictions of distributions p and q to S ⊆ [n],
sX
q
√
(qi − pi ) + dKL (pS , qS ) ≤ dχ2 (pS , qS ).
d2H (pS , qS ) ≤ dTV (pS , qS ) ≤ 2dH (pS , qS ) ≤
i∈S
We recall that dℓ2 fits into the picture by its relationship with total variation distance:
Proposition 2. Letting p and q be distributions over [n],
dℓ2 (p, q) ≤ 2dTV (p, q) ≤
√
ndℓ2 (p, q).
The second inequality follows from Cauchy-Schwarz.
We will also need to following bound for Hellinger distance:
Proposition 3. 2d2H (p, q) ≤
n
X
(pi − qi )2
i=1
pi + qi
≤ 4d2H (p, q).
Proof. Expanding the Hellinger-squared distance,
n
d2H (p, q) =
n
1X √
√
1 X (pi − qi )2
( pi − qi )2 =
.
√
√
2 i=1
2 i=1 ( pi + qi )2
√
√
The fact now follows because (pi + qi ) ≤ ( pi + qi )2 ≤ 2(pi + qi ).
7
Pn
The quantity i=1 (pi − qi )2 /(pi + qi ) is sometimes called the triangle distance. However, we see here that
it is essentially the Hellinger distance (up to constant factors).
Proposition 4. Given a number δ ∈ [0, 1] and a discrete distribution r = (r1 , . . . , rn ), define
r+δ := (1 − δ) · r + δ · ( n1 , . . . , n1 ).
Then given two discrete distributions p = (p1 , . . . , pn ) and q = (q1 , . . . , qn ),
dℓ2 (p+δ , q +δ ) = (1 − δ)dℓ2 (p, q).
dTV (p+δ , q +δ ) = (1 − δ)dTV (p, q),
√
In addition, dH (p+δ , q +δ ) ≥ dH (p, q) − 2 δ.
Proof. The statements for total variation and ℓ2 distance are immediate. As for the Hellinger distance, we
have by the triangle inequality that
dH (p, q) ≤ dH (p, p+δ ) + dH (p+δ , q +δ ) + dH (q +δ , q).
We can bound the first term by
d2H (p, p+δ ) ≤ dTV (p, p+δ ) =
1
2
· kδ · p − δ · ( n1 , . . . , n1 )k1 ≤ δ,
where the last step is by the triangle inequality,
and a similar argument bounds the third term by
√
well. Thus, dH (p+δ , q +δ ) ≥ dH (p, q) − 2 δ.
√
δ as
A similar technique was employed in [Gol16].
At times, our algorithms will employ Poisson sampling. Instead of taking m samples from a distribution
p, we instead take Poisson(m) samples. As a result, letting Ni be the number of occurences of symbol i,
all Ni will be independent and distributed as Poisson(m · pi ). We note that this method of sampling is for
purposes of analysis – concentration bounds imply that Poi(m) = O(m) with high probability, so such an
algorithm can be converted to one with a fixed budget of samples at a constant-factor increase in the sample
complexity.
3
Upper Bounds for Identity Testing
In this section, we prove the following theorems for identity testing.
Theorem 1. There exists an algorithm for identity testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 ;
• dH (p, q) ≥ ε.
The algorithm uses O
n1/2
ε2
n1/2
ε2
n1/2
ε2
samples.
samples.
samples.
Theorem 2. There exists an algorithm for identity testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• dℓ2 (p, q) ≤
√ε ;
n
• dTV (p, q) ≥ ε.
The algorithm uses O
Theorem 3. There exists an algorithm for identity testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• dℓ2 (p, q) ≤
ε2
√
;
n
• dH (p, q) ≥ ε.
The algorithm uses O
We prove Theorem 1 in Section 3.1, and Theorems 2 and 3 in Section 3.2.
8
3.1
Identity Testing with Hellinger Distance and χ2 -Tolerance
We prove Theorem 1 by analyzing Algorithm 1. We will set c1 =
large constant.
1
100 , c2
=
6
25 ,
and let C be a sufficiently
Algorithm 1 χ2 -close versus Hellinger-far testing algorithm
1: Input: ε; an explicit distribution q; sample access to a distribution p
2: Implicitly define A ← {i : qi ≥ c1 ε2 /n}, Ā ← [n] \ A
3: Let p̂ be the empirical distribution6 from drawing m1 = Θ(1/ε2) samples from p
4: if p̂(Ā) ≥ 34 c2 ε2 then
5:
return Reject
6: end if
√
7: Draw a multiset S of Poisson(m2 ) samples from p, where m2 = C n/ε2
8: Let Ni be the number of occurrences of the ith domain element in S
9: Let S ′ be the set of domain elements observed in S
P
(Ni −m2 qi )2 −Ni
+ m2 (1 − q(S ′ ∩ A))
10: Z ←
i∈S ′ ∩A
m2 qi
3
2
11: if Z ≤ 2 m2 ε then
12:
return Accept
13: else
14:
return Reject
15: end if
√
√
We note that the sample and time complexity are both O( n/ε2 ). We draw m1 + m2 = Θ( n/ε2 )
samples total. All steps of the algorithm only involve inspecting domain elements where a sample falls, and
it runs linearly in the number of such elements. Indeed, Step 10 of the algorithm is written in an unusual
way in order to ensure the running time of the algorithm is linear.
We first analyze the test in Step 4 of the algorithm. Folklore results state that with probability at least
99/100, this preliminary test will reject any p with p(Ā) ≥ c2 ε2 , it will not reject any p with p(Ā) ≤ c22 ε2 ,
and behavior for any other p is arbitrary. Condition on the event the test does not reject for the remainder
of the proof. Note that since both thresholds here are Θ(ε2 ), it only requires m1 = Θ(1/ε2 ) samples, rather
than the “non-extreme” regime, where we would require Θ(1/ε4 ) samples.
Remark 1. We informally refer to this “extreme” versus “non-extreme” regime in distribution testing. To
give an example of what we mean in these two cases, consider distinguishing Ber(1/2) from Ber(1/2 + ε).
The complexity of this problem is Θ(1/ε2), and we consider this to be in the non-extreme regime. On the
other hand, distinguishing Ber(ε) from Ber(2ε) has a sample complexity of Θ(1/ε), and we consider this to
be in the extreme regime.
We justify that any p which may be rejected in Step 5 (i.e., any p such that p(Ā) > c22 ε2 ) has the property
that dχ2 (p, q) > ε2 (in other words, we do not wrongfully reject any p).
Consider a p such that p(Ā) ≥ c22 ε2 . Note that dχ2 (p, q) ≥ dχ2 (pĀ , qĀ ), which we lower bound as follows:
X (pi − qi )2
qi
i∈Ā
X
n
≥
(pi − qi )2
c1 ε 2
i∈Ā
2
1 X
n
(pi − qi )
·
≥
c1 ε 2 n
dχ2 (pĀ , qĀ ) =
i∈Ā
4
c2
2
− c1
c1
2
n ε
≥
c1 ε 2
=
c2
2
9
− c1
n
ε2
2
The first inequality is by the definition of Ā, the second is by Cauchy-Schwarz, and the third is since
p(Ā) ≥ c22 ε2 and q(Ā) ≤ c1 ε2 . By our setting of c1 and c2 , this implies that dχ2 (p, q) > ε2 , and we are not
rejecting any p which should be accepted.
For the remainder of the proof, we will implicitly assume that p(Ā) ≤ c2 ε2 .
Let
X (Ni − m2 qi )2 − Ni
Z′ =
.
m2 qi
i∈A
Note that the statistic Z can be rewritten as follows:
Z=
X (Ni − m2 qi )2 − Ni
+ m2 (1 − q(S ′ ∩ A))
m
q
2
i
′
i∈S ∩A
=
X (Ni − m2 qi )2 − Ni
X
+
m2 qi + m2 q(Ā)
m2 qi
′
′
i∈S ∩A
i∈A\S
i∈S ∩A
i∈A\S
X (Ni − m2 qi )2 − Ni
X (Ni − m2 qi )2 − Ni
+
+ m2 q(Ā)
=
m2 qi
m2 qi
′
′
′
= Z + m2 q(Ā)
We proceed by analyzing Z ′ . First, note that it has the following expectation and variance:
X (pi − qi )2
= m2 · dχ2 (pA , qA )
qi
i∈A
X p2
pi · (pi − qi )2
Var[Z ′ ] =
2 2i + 4m2 ·
qi
qi2
E[Z ′ ] = m2 ·
(1)
(2)
i∈A
These properties are proven in Section A of [ADK15].
We require the following two lemmas, which state that the mean of the statistic is separated in the
two cases, and that the variance is bounded. The proofs largely follow the proofs of two similar lemmas
in [ADK15].
Lemma 1. If dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 , then E[Z ′ ] ≤ m2 ε2 . If dH (p, q) ≥ ε, then E[Z ′ ] ≥ (2 − c1 − c2 )m2 ε2 .
Proof. The former case is immediate from (1).
For the latter case, note that
d2H (p, q) = d2H (pA , qA ) + d2H (pĀ , qĀ ).
We upper bound the latter term as follows:
d2H (pĀ , qĀ ) ≤ dTV (pĀ , qĀ )
1X
=
|pi − qi |
2
i∈Ā
1
p(Ā) + q(Ā)
≤
2
c1 + c2
ε2
≤
2
The first inequality is from Proposition 1, and the third inequality is from our prior condition that p(Ā) ≤
c2 ε 2 .
2
2
ε . Proposition 1 further implies that
Since d2H (p, q) ≥ ε2 , this implies d2H (pA , qA ) ≥ 1 − c1 +c
2
dχ2 (pA , qA ) ≥ (2 − c1 − c2 ) ε2 . The lemma follows from (1).
10
Lemma 2. If dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 , then Var[Z ′ ] = O(m22 ε4 ). If dH (p, q) ≥ ε, then Var[Z ′ ] ≤ O(E[Z ′ ]2 ). The
constant in both expressions can be made arbitrarily small with the choice of the constant C.
Proof. We bound the terms of (2) separately, starting with the first.
X p2
i
2
qi2
i∈A
=2
X (pi − qi )2
qi2
i∈A
2pi qi − qi2
+
qi2
2qi (pi − qi ) + qi2
(pi − qi )2
+
=2
qi2
qi2
i∈A
X (pi − qi )2
(pi − qi )
+2
≤ 2n + 2
qi2
qi
X
i∈A
≤ 4n + 4
≤ 4n +
X (pi − qi )2
qi2
i∈A
4n X (pi − qi )2
c1 ε 2
qi
i∈A
4n E[Z ′ ]
= 4n +
c1 ε 2 m2
4 √
nE[Z ′ ]
≤ 4n +
c1 C
(3)
2
The second inequality is the AM-GM inequality, the third inequality uses that qi ≥ c1nε for all i ∈ A, the
√
last equality uses (1), and the final inequality substitutes a value m2 ≥ C ε2n .
The second term can be similarly bounded:
!1/2
!1/2
X p2
X (pi − qi )4
X pi (pi − qi )2
i
≤ 4m2
4m2
qi2
q2
qi2
i∈A i
i∈A
i∈A
!1/2
1/2 X
4
4 √
(p
−
q
)
i
i
≤ 4m2 4n +
nE[Z ′ ]
c1 C
qi2
i∈A
!
X
√
2
(pi − qi )2
1/4
′ 1/2
n E[Z ]
≤ 4m2 2 n + √
qi
c1 C
i∈A
√
8
n1/4 E[Z ′ ]1/2 E[Z ′ ].
= 8 n+ √
c1 C
The first inequality is Cauchy-Schwarz, the second inequality uses (3), the third inequality uses the monotonicity of the ℓp norms, and the equality uses (1).
Combining the two terms, we get
√
8
4
nE[Z ′ ] + √
n1/4 E[Z ′ ]3/2 .
Var[Z ′ ] ≤ 4n + 8 +
c1 C
c1 C
We now consider the two cases in the statement of our lemma.
• When dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 , we know from Lemma 1 that E[Z ′ ] ≤ m2 ε2 . Combined with a choice of m2 ≥ C
and the above expression for the variance, this gives:
8
4
8
4
m22 ε4 + √ m22 ε4
+
Var[Z ′ ] ≤ 2 m22 ε4 +
2
C
C
c1 C
C c1
4
4
8
8
m22 ε4 = O(m22 ε4 ).
=
+ √ + 2+
C
C c1
C
c1 C 2
11
√
n
ε2
• When dH (p, q) ≥ ε, Lemma 1 and m2 ≥ C
√
n
ε2
give:
√
E[Z ′ ] ≥ (2 − c1 − c2 )m2 ε2 ≥ C(2 − c1 − c2 ) n.
Similar to before, combining this with our expression for the variance we get:
′
Var[Z ] ≤
8
4
8
4
+ 2
+ p
+
C(2 − c1 − c2 ) C c1 (2 − c1 − c2 ) C 2 (2 − c1 − c2 )2
C c1 (2 − c1 − c2 )
!
E[Z ′ ]2
= O(E[Z ′ ]2 ).
To conclude the proof, we consider the two cases.
• Suppose dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 . By Lemma 1 and the definition of A, we have that E[Z] ≤ (1 + c1 )m2 ε2 .
By Lemma 2, Var[Z] = O(m22 ε4 ). Therefore, for constant C sufficiently large, Chebyshev’s inequality
implies Pr(Z > 32 m2 ε2 ) ≤ 1/10.
• Suppose dH (p, q) ≥ ε. By Lemma 1, we have that E[Z ′ ] ≥ (2 − c1 − c2 )m2 ε2 . By Lemma 2,
Var[Z ′ ] = O(E[Z ′ ]2 ). Therefore, for constant C sufficiently large, Chebyshev’s inequality implies
Pr(Z ′ < 32 m2 ε2 ) ≤ 1/10. Since Z ≥ Z ′ , Pr(Z < 23 m2 ε2 ) ≤ 1/10 as well.
3.2
Identity Testing with ℓ2 Tolerance
In this section, we sketch the algorithms required to achieve ℓ2 tolerance for identity testing. Since the
algorithms and analysis are very similar to those of Algorithm 1 of [ADK15] and Algorithm 1, the full details
are omitted.
First, we prove Theorem 2. The algorithm is Algorithm 1 of [ADK15], but instead of testing on p and q,
1
1
we instead test on p+ 2 and q + 2 , as defined in Proposition 4. By this proposition, this operation preserves
total variation and ℓ2 distance, up to a factor of 2, and also makes it so that the minimum probability
1
element of q + 2 is at least 1/2n. In the case where dℓ2 (p, q) ≤ √εn , we have the following upper bound on
E[Z]:
X (pi − qi )2
E[Z ′ ] = m
≤ O m · n · d2ℓ2 (p, q) ≤ O(m2 ε2 ).
qi
i∈Ā
This is the same bound as in Lemma 2 of [ADK15]. The rest of the analysis follows identically to that of
Algorithm 1 of [ADK15], giving us Theorem 2.
Next, we prove Theorem 3. We observe that Algorithm 1 as stated can be considered as ℓ2 -tolerant
2
instead of χ2 -tolerant, if desired. First, we do not wrongfully reject any p (i.e., those with dℓ2 (p, q) ≤ √ε n )
in Step 5. This is because we reject in this step if there is ≥ Ω(ε2 ) total variation distance between p and q
(witnessed by the set Ā), which implies that p and q are far in ℓ2 -distance by Proposition 2. It remains to
2
prove an upper bound on E[Z ′ ] in the case where dℓ2 (p, q) ≤ √ε n .
E[Z ′ ] = m2 dχ2 (p, q) = m2
n
X (pi − qi )2
≤ O m2 · 2 · d2ℓ2 (p, q) ≤ O(m2 ε2 ).
qi
ε
i∈Ā
We note that this is the same bound as in Lemma 1. With this bound on the mean, the rest of the analysis
is identical to that of Theorem 1, giving us Theorem 3.
4
Upper Bounds for Equivalence Testing
In this section, we prove the following theorems for equivalence testing.
Theorem 4. There exists an algorithm for equivalence testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• dℓ2 (p, q) ≤
ε
√
2 n
12
• dTV (p, q) ≥ ε
n 2/3 1/2 o
samples.
The algorithm uses O max nε4/3 , nε2
Theorem 5. There exists an algorithm for equivalence testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• dℓ2 (p, q) ≤
2
ε√
32 n
• dH (p, q) ≥ ε
n 2/3 3/4 o
samples.
The algorithm uses O min nε8/3 , nε2
Consider drawing Poisson(m) samples from two unknown distributions p = (p1 , . . . , pn ) and q = (q1 , . . . , qn ).
Given the resulting histograms X and Y , [CDVV14] define the following statistic:
Z=
n
X
(Xi − Yi )2 − Xi − Yi
i=1
X i + Yi
.
(4)
This can be viewed as a modification to the empirical triangle distance applied to X and Y . Both of our
equivalence testing upper bounds will be obtained by appropriate thresholding of the statistic Z.
The organization of this section is as follows. In Section 4.1, we prove some basic properties of Z. In
Section 4.2, we prove Theorem 4. In Section 4.3, we prove Theorem 5.
4.1
Some facts about Z
Chan et al. [CDVV14] give the following expressions for the mean and variance of Z.
Proposition 5 ([CDVV14]). Consider the function
1 − e−x
.
f (x) = 1 −
x
Then for any subset A ⊆ [n],
E[ZA ] =
X (pi − qi )2
i∈A
pi + qi
m · f (m(pi + qi )).
(5)
As a result, Z is mean-zero when p = q. Furthermore,
Var[Z] ≤ 2 min{m, n} +
n
X
i=1
5m
(pi − qi )2
.
pi + qi
Applying Proposition 3, we immediately have the following corollary.
Corollary 1. Var[Z] ≤ 2 min{m, n} + 20mdH (p, q)2 .
Without the corrective factor of f (m(pi + qi )), Equation (5) would just be m times the triangle distance
between p and q. Our goal then is to understand the function f (x) and how it affects this quantity. Aside
from the removable discontinuity at x = 0, f is a monotonically increasing function, and for x > 0, it
is strictly bounded between 0 and 1. Furthermore, for x > 0 there are roughly two “regimes” that f (x)
exhibits: when x < 1, where f (x) is well-approximated by x/2, and when x ≥ 1, where f (x) is “morally the
constant one,” slowly increasing from e−1 to 1. In fact, we have the following explicit bound on f (x).
Fact 1. For all x > 0, f (x) ≤ min{1, x}.
1
. Hence,
In terms of f (m(pi + qi )), these regimes correspond to whether pi + qi is less than or greater than m
the expression for the mean of Z (i.e. Equation (5) for A = [n]) splits in two: those terms for “large” pi + qi
look roughly like the triangle distance (times m), and those terms for “small” pi + qi look roughly like the ℓ22
distance (times m2 ). This is why we have given ourselves the flexibility to consider subsets A of the domain.
We will now prove several upper and lower bounds on E[ZA ], based in part on whether we will apply
them in the large or small pi + qi regime. Let us begin with a pair of upper bounds.
13
Proposition 6. Suppose for every i ∈ A, pi + qi ≥ δ. Then
E[ZA ] ≤
m 2
d (pA , qA ).
δ ℓ2
Proof. Because f (x) ≤ 1 for all x > 0,
E[ZA ] =
X (pi − qi )2
i∈A
pi + qi
m · f (m(pi + qi )) ≤
X (pi − qi )2
i∈A
pi + qi
m≤
mX
m
(pi − qi )2 = d2ℓ2 (pA , qA ).
δ
δ
i∈A
Proposition 7. E[Z] ≤ m2 d2ℓ2 (p, q).
Proof. Let L be the set of i such that m(pi + qi ) ≥ 1. Then E[Z] = E[ZL ] + E[ZL ], and by Proposition 6,
E[ZL ] ≤ m2 d2ℓ2 (pL , qL ). On the other hand, by Fact 1, f (x) ≤ x, and therefore
E[ZL ] =
X (pi − qi )2
pi + qi
i∈L
m · f (m(pi + qi )) ≤
X
i∈L
(pi − qi )2 m2 = m2 d2ℓ2 (pL , qL ).
The proof is completed by noting that d2ℓ2 (pL , qL ) + d2ℓ2 (pL , qL ) = d2ℓ2 (p, q).
Now we give a pair of lower bounds.
Proposition 8. Suppose for every i ∈ A, m(pi + qi ) ≥ 1. Then
E[ZA ] ≥
2m 2
d (pA , qA ).
3 H
Proof. Because f (x) is monotonically increasing and f (1) = 1/e,
E[ZA ] = m
X (pi − qi )2
i∈A
pi + qi
f (m(pi + qi )) ≥ m
X (pi − qi )2
i∈A
pi + qi
f (1) ≥
2m 2
d (pA , qA ),
e H
where the first step is by Proposition 5 and the last is by Proposition 3. The result follows from e ≤ 3.
The next proposition is essentially the second half of the proof of Lemma 4 from [CDVV14].
Proposition 9. For any subset A,
E[ZA ] ≥
where we write p(A) =
P
i∈A
4m2
2|A| + m · (p(A) + q(A))
· d2TV (pA , qA ),
p(i) and likewise for q(A).
Proof. Consider the function g(x) = xf (x)−1 . Then g(x) ≤ 2 + x for nonnegative x. Furthermore,
(pi − qi )2
(pi − qi )2
=
g(m(pi + qi ))
m(pi + qi )
which, from Proposition 5, is
d2TV (pA , qA )
1
=
4
≤
1
4
X
i∈A
X
i∈A
1
m2
|pi − qi |
1−
1 − e−m(pi +qi )
m(pi + qi )
,
· E[Z{i} ]. As a result,
!2
1
=
4
!
(pi − qi )2
g(m(pi + qi ))
·
!2
p
g(m(pi + qi ))
|pi − qi | · p
g(m(pi + qi ))
i∈A
!
X
1
· E[ZA ] · (2|A| + m · (p(A) + q(A))),
g(m(pi + qi )) ≤
4m2
X
i∈A
where the first inequality is Cauchy-Schwarz. Rearranging finishes the proof.
14
4.2
Equivalence Testing with Total Variation Distance
In this section, we prove Theorem 4. We will take the number of samples to be
n1/2
n2/3
m = max C · 4/3 , C 3/2 · 2
,
ε
ε
(6)
where C is some constant which can be taken to be 1010 .
Rather than drawing samples from p or q, our algorithm draws samples from p+1/2 and q +1/2 . By
Proposition 4, we have the following guarantees in the two cases:
ε
(Case 1): dℓ2 (p+1/2 , q +1/2 ) ≤ √ ,
4 n
(Case 2): dTV (p+1/2 , q +1/2 ) ≥
ε
.
2
Furthermore, for any i ∈ [n], we know the i-th coordinates of p+1/2 and q +1/2 are both at least
forth, we will write p′ and q ′ for p+1/2 and q +1/2 , respectively.
In Case 1, if we apply Proposition 6 with A = [n] and δ = n1 and Proposition 7,
E[Z] ≤ min{m2 , mn} · d2ℓ2 (p′ , q ′ ) ≤ min{m2 , mn} ·
1
2n .
Hence-
m2
ε2
≤
· ε2 .
16n
4(2m + 2n)
On the other hand, in Case 2, applying Proposition 9 with A = [n],
E[Z] ≥
4m2
m2
· dTV (p′ , q ′ )2 ≥
· ε2 .
2m + 2n
2m + 2n
2
5m
ε2 , outputting “close” if it’s below this value
Our algorithm therefore thresholds Z on the value 8(2m+2n)
and “far” otherwise.
The two bounds in (6) meet when C 3 ε−4 = n, which is exactly when m = n. When m ≤ n, the first
bound applies, and when m > n the second bound applies. As a result, we will split our analysis into the
two cases.
Lemma 3. The tester succeeds in the m ≤ n case of Theorem 4.
Proof. By Corollary 1
Var[Z] ≤ 2 min{m, n} + 20mdH (p′ , q ′ )2 ≤ 22m,
where we used the fact that dH (p′ , q ′ ) ≤ 1. In Case 1, by Chebyshev’s inequality,
!
2
n
Var[Z]
m
5m2
2
.
ε ≤
Pr Z ≥
2 = O m4 4 = O
3 ε4
2
8(2m + 2n)
m
3m
n2 ε
ε2
8(2m+2n)
In Case 2,
5m2
64Var[Z]
Pr Z ≤
=O
ε2 ≤
8(2m + 2n)
9E[Z]2
m
m4 4
n2 ε
!
=O
n2
m3 ε 4
.
Both of these bounds can be made arbitrarily small constants by setting C sufficiently large.
Lemma 4. The tester succeeds in the m ≥ n case of Theorem 4.
Proof. We first consider Case 1. By Proposition 5,
Var[Z] ≤ 2 min{m, n} +
Then, we have that
5m2
Pr Z ≥
ε2 ≤
8(2m + 2n)
n
X
i=1
5m
(p′i − qi′ )2
≤ 2n + 5mnd2ℓ2 (p′ , q ′ ) ≤ 2n +
p′i + qi′
Var[Z]
3m2
2
8(2m+2n) ε
2 = O
15
mε2
n
+
m2 ε 4
m2 ε 4
=O
2
5
16 mε .
n
1
+
2
4
m ε
mε2
.
′
′
Next, we focus on Case 2. Write L for the set of i ∈ [n] such that m(p′i + qi′ ) ≥ 1. Then d2H (pL
, qL
) ≤
P
1
′
′
(p
+
q
)
≤
n/2m.
As
a
result,
by
Corollary
1
i
i∈L i
2
′
Var[Z] ≤ 2 min{m, n} + 20md2H (p′ , q ′ ) ≤ 12n + 20md2H (p′L , qL
).
2
′
′
By Proposition 8, E[Z] ≥ 2m
3 dH (pL , qL ). Hence,
′
64Var[Z]
md2H (p′L , qL
)
n
5m2
=
O
+
ε2 ≤
Pr Z ≤
8(2m + 2n)
9E[Z]2
E[Z]2
E[Z]2
n
n
1
1
=O
=
O
.
+
+
E[Z]2
E[Z]
m2 ε 4
mε2
Both of these bounds can be made arbitrarily small constants by setting C sufficiently large.
4.3
Equivalence Testing with Hellinger Distance
In this section, we prove Theorem 5. We will take the number of samples to be
n3/4
n2/3
,
m = min C · 8/3 , C 3/4 · 2
ε
ε
where C is some constant which can be taken to be 1010 .
Rather than drawing samples from p or q, our algorithm draws samples from p+δ and q +δ for δ = ε2 /32.
By Proposition 4, we have the following guarantees in the two cases:
(Case 1): dℓ2 (p, q) ≤
ε2
√ ,
32 n
(Case 2): dH (p, q) ≥
1
ε.
2
2
ε
. Henceforth,
Furthermore, for any i ∈ [n], we know the i-th coordinates of p+δ and q +δ are both at least 32n
′
′
+δ
+δ
we will write p and q for p and q , respectively.
The two bounds meet when C 3/4 ε−2 = n1/4 , which is exactly when m = n. When m ≤ n, the first bound
applies, and when m > n the second bound applies. As a result, we will split our analysis into the two cases.
Lemma 5. The tester succeeds in the m ≤ n case of Theorem 5.
Proof. In Case 1, if we apply Proposition 7,
E[Z] ≤ m2 · d2ℓ2 (p′ , q ′ ) ≤
m2 ε 4
.
322 n
On the other hand, in Case 2, applying Proposition 9 with A = [n],
4m2
m2 ε 4
4m2
′ ′ 2
E[Z] ≥
· dTV (p , q ) ≥
· dH (p′ , q ′ )4 ≥
.
2n + 2m
2n + 2m
16n
2 4
ε
Our algorithm therefore thresholds Z on the value m
128n , outputting “close” if it’s below this value and “far”
otherwise.
By Corollary 1
Var[Z] ≤ 2 min{m, n} + 20mdH (p′ , q ′ )2 ≤ 22m,
where we used the fact that dH (p′ , q ′ ) ≤ 1. In Case 1,
Var[Z]
m2 ε 4
≤
Pr Z ≥
=O
m2 ε4 2
128n
256n
m
m4 8
n2 ε
!
=O
n2
m3 ε 8
.
In Case 2,
m2 ε 4
64Var[Z]
Pr Z ≤
=O
≤
128n
49E[Z]2
m
m4 8
n2 ε
!
=O
n2
m3 ε 8
.
Both of these bounds can be made arbitrarily small constants by setting C sufficiently large.
16
Lemma 6. The tester succeeds in the m > n case of Theorem 5.
2
ε
Proof. In Case 1, if we apply Proposition 6 with A = [n] and δ = 16n
and Proposition 7,
2 4
n
n
mn o ε4
m ε mε2
mn o 2 ′ ′
2
2
.
,
E[Z] ≤ min m , 16 2 · dℓ2 (p , q ) ≤ min m , 16 2 · 2 = min
ε
ε
32 n
322 n 64
Case 2 is more complicated. We will need to define the set of “large” coordinates L = {i : m(p′i + qi′ ) ≥ 1}
and the set of “small” coordinates S = [n] \ L. Applying Proposition 9 to S, we have
4m2 2
4m2
2
′
′
E[ZS ] ≥
·
d
(p
,
q
)
≥
d (p′ , q ′ ),
TV
S
S
2|S| + m · (p′ (S) + q ′ (S))
3n TV S S
where m · (p′ (S) + q ′ (S)) ≤ n by the definition of S. If we also apply Proposition 8 to L, we get
2 4
4m2 2
2m 2 ′ ′
m ε mε2
′
′
E[Z] = E[ZS ] + E[ZL ] ≥
,
d (p , q ) +
d (p , q ) ≥ min
,
3n TV S S
3 H L L
48n 12
′
where the last step follows because d2H (p′S , qS′ ) + d2H (p′L , qL
) = d2H (p′ , q ′ ) and d2TV (p′S , qS′ ) ≥ d4H (p′S , qS′ ). As a
result, we threshold Z on the value
2 4
1
m ε mε2
,
· min
,
2
48n 12
outputting “close” if it’s below this value and “far” otherwise.
In Case 1, by Proposition 5,
Var[Z] ≤ 2 min{m, n} +
m
X
i=1
5m
(p′i − qi′ )2
80mn ′
5
≤ 2n +
kp − q ′ k22 ≤ 2n + mε2 .
′
′
2
pi + qi
ε
64
Hence, by Chebyshev’s inequality,
2 4
Var[Z]
1
m ε mε2
2 4
≤ 1
Pr Z ≥ · min
,
2
2
2
48n 12
( 8 · min m48nε , mε
12 )
≤O
!
n
mε2
mε2
+
+ m2 ε4 +
2 4
(mε2 )2
(mε2 )2
( mnε )2
( n )2
3
n
n
n2
1
+
+
+
=O
.
m4 ε 8
m2 ε 4
m3 ε 6
mε2
n
This can be made an arbitrarily small constant by setting C sufficiently large.
In Case 2, by Corollary 1,
4Var[Z]
8n + 80mdH (p′ , q ′ )2
E[Z]
≤
≤
.
Pr Z ≤
2
E[Z]2
E[Z]2
(7)
′
′
Because dH (p′ , q ′ )2 = d2H (p′S , qS′ ) + d2H (p′L , qL
), either d2H (p′S , qS′ ) or d2H (p′L , qL
) is at least 21 d2H (p′ , q ′ ). Suppose
1 2
′
′
′ ′
2
that dH (pS , qS ) ≥ 2 dH (p , q ). We note that
mX ′
n
mX p ′ p ′ 2
( pi − qi ) ≤
|pi + qi′ | ≤ ,
md2H (p′S , qS′ ) =
2
2
2
i∈S
i∈S
by the definition of S. Thus,
(7) ≤
8n + 160md2H (p′S , qS′ )
88n
≤ 4m2 2
=O
2
2 (p′ , q ′ ))2
′
′
2
( 4m
(
d
d
3n TV S S
3n TV (pS , qS ))
n3
4
4
m dTV (p′S , qS′ )
≤O
n3
m4 ε 8
,
where the last step used the fact that dTV (p′S , qS′ ) ≥ d2H (p′S , qS′ ) ≥ 12 d2H (p′ , q ′ ) ≥ 21 ε2 .
′
In the case when d2H (p′L , qL
) ≥ 12 d2H (p′ , q ′ ),
′
n
1
1
n
8n + 160md2H (p′L , qL
)
≤
O
.
+
+
=
O
(7) ≤
′ )
′ )
2
′
′
2
m2 d4H (p′L , qL
md2H (p′L , qL
m2 ε 4
mε2
( 2m
3 dH (pL , qL ))
This can be made an arbitrarily small constant by setting C sufficiently large.
17
5
Upper Bounds Based on Estimation
We start by showing a simple meta-algorithm – in short, it says that if a testing problem is well-defined (i.e.,
has appropriate separation between the cases) and we can estimate one of the distances, it can be converted
to a testing algorithm.
Theorem 6. Suppose there exists an m(n, ε)-sample algorithm which, given sample access to distributions
p and q over [n] and parameter ε, estimates some distance d(p, q) up to an additive ε with probability at
least 2/3. Consider distances dX (·, ·), dY (·, ·) and ε1 , ε2 > 0 such that dY (p, q) ≥ ε2 → dX (p, q) > 3ε1 /2 and
dX (p, q) ≤ ε1 → dY (p, q) < 2ε2 /3, and d(·, ·) is either dX (·, ·) or dY (·, ·).
Then there exists an algorithm for equivalence testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• dX (p, q) ≤ ε1 ;
• dY (p, q) ≥ ε2 .
The algorithm uses either m(n, O(ε1 )) or m(n, O(ε2 )) samples, depending on whether d = dX or dY .
Proof. Suppose that d = dX , the other case follows similarly. Using the m(n, ε1 /4) samples, obtain an
estimate τ̂ of dX (p, q), accurate up to an additive ε1 /4. If τ̂ ≤ 5ε1 /4, output that dX (p, q) ≤ ε1 , else output
that dY (p, q) ≥ ε2 . Conditioning on the correctness of the estimation algorithm, correctness for the case
when dX (p, q) ≤ ε1 is immediate, and correctness for the case when dY (p, q) ≥ ε2 follows from the separation
between the cases.
It is folklore that a distribution over [n] can be ε-learned in ℓ2 -distance with O(1/ε2 ) samples (see, i.e.,
[CDVV14, Wag15] for a reference). By triangle inequality, this implies that we can estimate the ℓ2 distance
between p and q up to an additive O(ε) with O(1/ε2 ) samples, leading to the following corollary.
Corollary 2. There exists an algorithm for equivalence testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• d(p, q) ≤ f (n, ε);
• dℓ2 (p, q) ≥ ε,
where d(·, ·) is a distance and f (n, ε) is such that dℓ2 (p, q) ≥ ε → d(p, q) ≥ 3f (n, ε)/2 and d(p, q) ≤ f (n, ε) →
dℓ2 (p, q) ≤ 2ε/3. The algorithm uses O(1/ε2 ) samples.
Finally, we note that total variation distance between p and q can be additively estimated up to a constant
using O(n/ log n) samples [LC06, VV11b, JHW16], leading to the following corollary:
Corollary 3. For constant ε > 0, there exists an algorithm for equivalence testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• dTV (p, q) ≤ ε2 /4;
√
• dH (p, q) ≥ ε/ 2.
The algorithm uses O(n/ log n) samples.
6
Lower Bounds
We start with a simple lower bound, showing that identity testing with respect to KL divergence is impossible.
A similar observation was made in [BFR+ 00].
Theorem 7. No finite sample test can perform identity testing between p and q distinguishing the cases:
• p = q;
• dKL (p, q) ≥ ε2 .
18
Proof. Simply take q = (1, 0) and let p be either (1, 0) or (1 − δ, δ), for δ > 0 tending to zero. Then p = q in
the first case and dKL (p, q) = ∞ in the second, but distinguishing between these two possibilities for p takes
Ω(δ −1 ) → ∞ samples.
Next, we prove our lower bound for KL tolerant identity testing.
Theorem 8. There exist constants 0 < s < c, such that any algorithm for identity testing between p and q
distinguishing the cases:
• dKL (p, q) ≤ s;
• dTV (p, q) ≥ c;
requires Ω(n/ log n) samples.
Proof. Let q = ( n1 , . . . , n1 ) be the uniform distribution. Let R(·, ·) denote the relative earthmover distance
(see [VV10a] for the definition). By Theorem 1 of [VV10a], for any δ < 41 there exist sets of distributions C
and F (for close and far ) such that:
• For every p ∈ C, R(p, q) = O(δ| log δ|).
• For every p ∈ F there exists a distribution r which is uniform over n/2 elements such that R(p, r) =
O(δ| log δ|).
δn
) samples.
• Distinguishing between p ∈ C and p ∈ F requires Ω( log(n)
Now, if p ∈ C then
dKL (p, q) =
n
X
i=1
pi log
pi
1/n
= log(n) − H(p) ≤ O(δ| log(δ)|),
where H(p) is the Shannon entropy of p, and here we used the fact that |H(p) − H(q)| ≤ R(p, q), which
follows from Fact 5 of [VV10a]. On the other hand, if q ∈ F , let r be the corresponding distribution which
is uniform over n/2 elements. Then
1
= dTV (p, q) ≤ dTV (q, p) + dTV (p, r) ≤ dTV (q, p) + O(δ| log δ|),
2
where we used the triangle inequality and the fact that dTV (p, r) ≤ R(p, r) (see [VV10a] page 4). As a result,
if we set δ to be some small constant, s = O(δ| log(δ)|), and c = 21 − O(δ| log δ|), then this argument shows
that distinguish dKL (p, q) ≤ s versus dTV (p, q) ≥ c requires Ω(n/ log n) samples.
Finally, we conclude with our lower bound for χ2 -tolerant equivalence testing.
Theorem 9. There exists a constant ε > 0 such that any algorithm for equivalence testing between p and q
distinguishing the cases:
• dχ2 (p, q) ≤ ε2 /4;
• dTV (p, q) ≥ ε;
requires Ω(n/ log n) samples.
Proof. We reduce the problem of distinguishing dH (p, q) ≤ √148 ε from dTV (p, q) ≥ 3ε to this. Define the
distributions
1
1
2
2
q ′ = p + q.
p′ = p + q,
3
3
3
3
Then m samples from p′ and q ′ can be simulated by m samples from p and q. Furthermore,
1
dH (p′ , q ′ ) ≤ √ ε,
48
dTV (p′ , q ′ ) =
19
1
dTV (p, q) ≥ ε,
3
where we used the fact that Hellinger distance satisfies the data processing inequality. But then, in the
“close” case,
n
n
X
X
(p′i − qi′ )2
(p′i − qi′ )2
1
dχ2 (p′ , q ′ ) =
≤ 12d2H (p′ , q ′ ) ≤ ε2 ,
≤
3
′
′
′
qi
pi + qi
4
i=1
i=1
where we used the fact that p′i ≤ 2qi′ and Proposition 3. Hence, this problem, which requires Ω(n/ log n)
samples (by the relationship between total variation and Hellinger distance, and the lower bound for testing
total variation-close versus -far of [VV10a]), reduces to the problem in the proposition, and so that requires
Ω(n/ log n) samples as well.
References
[ADK15]
Jayadev Acharya, Constantinos Daskalakis, and Gautam Kamath. Optimal testing for properties of distributions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, NIPS ’15,
pages 3577–3598. Curran Associates, Inc., 2015.
[ADOS17]
Jayadev Acharya, Hirakendu Das, Alon Orlitsky, and Ananda Theertha Suresh. A unified
maximum likelihood approach for estimating symmetric properties of discrete distributions. In
Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML ’17, pages 11–21.
JMLR, Inc., 2017.
[AOST17]
Jayadev Acharya, Alon Orlitsky, Ananda Theertha Suresh, and Himanshu Tyagi. Estimating
rényi entropy of discrete distributions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 63(1):38–56,
2017.
[BCG17]
Eric Blais, Clément L. Canonne, and Tom Gur. Distribution testing lower bounds via reductions
from communication complexity. In Proceedings of the 32nd Computational Complexity Conference, CCC ’17, pages 28:1–28:40, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2017. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum
fuer Informatik.
[BFF+ 01]
Tuğkan Batu, Eldar Fischer, Lance Fortnow, Ravi Kumar, Ronitt Rubinfeld, and Patrick White.
Testing random variables for independence and identity. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual
IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS ’01, pages 442–451, Washington,
DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society.
[BFR+ 00]
Tuğkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Warren D. Smith, and Patrick White. Testing
that distributions are close. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations
of Computer Science, FOCS ’00, pages 259–269, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. IEEE Computer
Society.
[BFR+ 13]
Tuğkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Warren D. Smith, and Patrick White. Testing
closeness of discrete distributions. Journal of the ACM, 60(1):4:1–4:25, 2013.
[BKR04]
Tuğkan Batu, Ravi Kumar, and Ronitt Rubinfeld. Sublinear algorithms for testing monotone
and unimodal distributions. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory
of Computing, STOC ’04, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
[BV15]
Bhaswar Bhattacharya and Gregory Valiant. Testing closeness with unequal sized samples. In
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, NIPS ’15, pages 2611–2619. Curran
Associates, Inc., 2015.
[Can15]
Clément L. Canonne. A survey on distribution testing: Your data is big. but is it blue?
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 22(63), 2015.
[CDGR16]
Clément L. Canonne, Ilias Diakonikolas, Themis Gouleakis, and Ronitt Rubinfeld. Testing
shape restrictions of discrete distributions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium on Theoretical
Aspects of Computer Science, STACS ’16, pages 25:1–25:14, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2016. Schloss
Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.
20
[CDKS17]
Clément L. Canonne, Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, and Alistair Stewart. Testing Bayesian
networks. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, COLT ’17, pages
370–448, 2017.
[CDVV14]
Siu-On Chan, Ilias Diakonikolas, Gregory Valiant, and Paul Valiant. Optimal algorithms for
testing closeness of discrete distributions. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA ’14, pages 1193–1203, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2014.
SIAM.
[DBNNR11] Khanh Do Ba, Huy L. Nguyen, Huy N. Nguyen, and Ronitt Rubinfeld. Sublinear time algorithms for earth movers distance. Theory of Computing Systems, 48(2):428–442, 2011.
[DDK18]
Constantinos Daskalakis, Nishanth Dikkala, and Gautam Kamath. Testing Ising models. In
Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA ’18,
Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018. SIAM.
[DGPP16]
Ilias Diakonikolas, Themis Gouleakis, John Peebles, and Eric Price. Collision-based testers are
optimal for uniformity and closeness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.03579, 2016.
[DK16]
Ilias Diakonikolas and Daniel M. Kane. A new approach for testing properties of discrete
distributions. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer
Science, FOCS ’16, pages 685–694, Washington, DC, USA, 2016. IEEE Computer Society.
[DKN15]
Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, and Vladimir Nikishkin. Testing identity of structured distributions. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms,
SODA ’15, pages 1841–1854, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2015. SIAM.
[DP17]
Constantinos Daskalakis and Qinxuan Pan. Square Hellinger subadditivity for Bayesian networks and its applications to identity testing. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference on
Learning Theory, COLT ’17, pages 697–703, 2017.
[Gol16]
Oded Goldreich. The uniform distribution is complete with respect to testing identity to a fixed
distribution. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 23(15), 2016.
[GR00]
Oded Goldreich and Dana Ron. On testing expansion in bounded-degree graphs. Electronic
Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 7(20), 2000.
[GS02]
Alison L. Gibbs and Francis E. Su. On choosing and bounding probability metrics. International
Statistical Review, 70(3):419–435, dec 2002.
[HJW16]
Yanjun Han, Jiao Jiantao, and Tsachy Weissman. Minimax rate-optimal estimation of divergences between discrete distributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.09124, 2016.
[JHW16]
Jiantao Jiao, Yanjun Han, and Tsachy Weissman. Minimax estimation of the ℓ1 distance. In
Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT ’16, pages
750–754, Washington, DC, USA, 2016. IEEE Computer Society.
[JVHW17]
Jiantao Jiao, Kartik Venkat, Yanjun Han, and Tsachy Weissman. Minimax estimation of
functionals of discrete distributions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 61(5):2835–
2885, 2017.
[LC06]
Erich Leo Lehmann and George Casella. Theory of Point Estimation. Springer, 2006.
[Pan08]
Liam Paninski. A coincidence-based test for uniformity given very sparsely sampled discrete
data. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 54(10):4750–4755, 2008.
[Val11]
Paul Valiant. Testing symmetric properties of distributions. SIAM Journal on Computing,
40(6):1927–1968, 2011.
21
[VV10a]
Gregory Valiant and Paul Valiant. A CLT and tight lower bounds for estimating entropy.
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 17(179), 2010.
[VV10b]
Gregory Valiant and Paul Valiant. Estimating the unseen: A sublinear-sample canonical estimator of distributions. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 17(180),
2010.
[VV11a]
Gregory Valiant and Paul Valiant. Estimating the unseen: An n/ log n-sample estimator for
entropy and support size, shown optimal via new CLTs. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual
ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, STOC ’11, pages 685–694, New York, NY,
USA, 2011. ACM.
[VV11b]
Gregory Valiant and Paul Valiant. The power of linear estimators. In Proceedings of the 52nd
Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS ’11, pages 403–412,
Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer Society.
[VV17]
Gregory Valiant and Paul Valiant. An automatic inequality prover and instance optimal identity
testing. SIAM Journal on Computing, 46(1):429–455, 2017.
[Wag15]
Bo Waggoner. lp testing and learning of discrete distributions. In Proceedings of the 6th
Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS ’15, pages 347–356, New
York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.
[WY16]
Yihong Wu and Pengkun Yang. Minimax rates of entropy estimation on large alphabets via
best polynomial approximation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 62(6):3702–3720,
2016.
A
Proof of Proposition 1
Recall that we will prove this
of probability distributionsP
to subsets of theP
support – in other
P
P for restrictions
words, we do not assume i∈S pi = i∈S qi = 1, we only assume that i∈S pi ≤ 1 and i∈S qi ≤ 1.
d2H (pS , qS ) ≤ dTV (pS , qS ) :
1X √
√
( pi − qi )2
2
i∈S
√ √
√
1X √
≤
| pi − qi |( pi + qi )
2
i∈S
1X
=
|pi − qi |
2
d2H (pS , qS ) =
i∈S
= dTV (pS , qS ).
22
dTV (pS , qS ) ≤
√
2dH (pS , qS ) :
d2TV (pS , qS )
1
=
4
1
=
4
1
≤
4
≤
X
i∈S
|pi − qi |
!2
!2
X √
√
√
√
| pi − qi | ( pi + qi )
i∈S
X √
√ 2
| pi − qi |
i∈S
d2H (pS , qS )
1
·
2
X√
√
( pi + qi )2
i∈S
X√
√
( pi + qi )2
i∈S
X
= d2H (pS , qS ) ·
!
pi +
i∈S
X
i∈S
!
!
!
qi − d2H (pS , qS )
≤ d2H (pS , qS ) · 2 − d2H (pS , qS )
≤ 2d2H (pS , qS ).
Taking the square root of both sides gives the result. The second inequality is Cauchy-Schwarz.
2d2H (pS , qS ) ≤
P
i∈S (qi
− pi ) + dKL (pS , qS ) :
2d2H (pS , qS ) =
X
i∈S
=
X
i∈S
(qi + pi ) − 2
X√
pi qi
i∈S
(qi + pi ) − 2
X
j∈S
pj
X
i∈S
pi
P
j∈S
pj
r
qi
pi
!
X
p
q
1
i
i
P
log
≤
(qi + pi ) − 2
pj exp
2
pi
pj
j∈S
i∈S
i∈S
j∈S
!
X
X
X
1
p
q
i
i
P
≤
(qi + pi ) − 2
pj 1 +
log
2
pi
pj
j∈S
i∈S
j∈S
i∈S
!
X
X
qi
=
(qi − pi ) −
pi log
pi
i∈S
i∈S
X
=
(qi − pi ) + dKL (pS , qS ).
X
X
i∈S
The first inequality is Jensen’s, and the second is 1 + x ≤ exp(x).
23
dKL (pS , qS ) ≤
P
i∈S (pi
− qi ) + dχ2 (pS , qS ) :
X
X
p
P i
dKL (pS , qS ) =
pj
j∈S
≤
X
=
X
=
X
≤
X
=
j∈S
j∈S
j∈S
j∈S
X
i∈S
i∈S
pj log P
pj log
pi
log
p
qi
j∈S j
!
X p2
!
1
i
j∈S
pj
1
P
j∈S
pj
pj log 2 + P
pj 1 + P
i∈S
dχ2 (pS , qS ) + 2
j∈S
pj
pj
dχ2 (pS , qS ) −
dχ2 (pS , qS ) −
(pi − qi ) + dχ2 (pS , qS ).
The first inequality is Jensen’s, and the second is 1 + x ≤ exp(x).
24
X
i∈S
1
1
j∈S
qi
X
i∈S
pi −
X
qi
i∈S
qi
!!
X
qi
i∈S
!!!
!!!
| 8cs.DS
|
Least squares estimator for non-ergodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck
processes driven by Gaussian processes
arXiv:1507.00802v2 [math.PR] 26 Sep 2016
Mohamed El Machkouri1 , Khalifa Es-Sebaiy2 and Youssef Ouknine3
Abstract: The statistical analysis for equations driven by fractional Gaussian process (fGp) is
relatively recent. The development of stochastic calculus with respect to the fGp allowed to study
such models. In the present paper we consider the drift parameter estimation problem for the
non-ergodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process defined as dXt = θXt dt + dGt , t ≥ 0 with an unknown
parameter θ > 0, where G is a Gaussian process. We provide sufficient conditions, based on the
properties of G, ensuring the strong consistency and the asymptotic distribution of our estimator
θet of θ based on the observation {Xs , s ∈ [0, t]} as t → ∞. Our approach offers an elementary,
unifying proof of [4], and it allows to extend the result of [4] to the case when G is a fractional
Brownian motion with Hurst parameter H ∈ (0, 1). We also discuss the cases of subfractional
Brownian motion and bifractional Brownian motion.
Key words: Parameter estimation, Non-ergodic Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.
1
Introduction
While the statistical inference of Ito’s type diffusions has a long history, the statistical analysis
for equations driven by fractional Gaussian process is relatively recent. The development of
stochastic calculus with respect to the fGp has allowed to study such models. We will recall
several approaches to estimate the parameters in fractional models but we mention that the list
below is not exhaustive:
- The MLE approach in [12], [16]: In general the techniques used to construct maximum
likelihood estimators (MLE) for the drift parameter are based on Girsanov’s transforms for
fBm and depend on the properties of the deterministic fractional operators (determined by
the Hurst parameter) related to the fBm. In this case, the MLE is not easily computable.
- A least squares approach has been proposed in [10]: The study of the asymptotic properties of
the estimator is based on certain criteria formulated in terms of the Malliavin calculus. In
the ergodic case, the statistical inference for several fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (fOU)
models has been recently developed in the papers [10], [1], [2], [11], [6], [5]. The case of
non-ergodic fOU process of the first kind and of the second kind can be found in [4] and
[7] respectively.
1
Laboratoire de Mathématiques Raphaël Salem UMR CNRS 6085, Université de Rouen, France. Email:
[email protected]
2
National School of Applied Sciences-Marrakesh, Cadi Ayyad University Av. Abdelkrim Khattabi,
40000, Guéliz-Marrakech, Morocco. Email: [email protected]
3
National School of Applied Sciences-Marrakesh, Cadi Ayyad University Av. Abdelkrim Khattabi,
40000, Guéliz-Marrakech, Morocco. Email: [email protected]
1
- Method of moments: A new idea has been provided in [9], to develop the statistical inference
for stochastic differential equations related to stationary Gaussian processes by proposing a
suitable criteria. This approach is based on the Malliavin calculus, and it makes in principle
the estimators easier to be simulated. Moreover, as an application, the models discussed
in [10], [1], [2], [6] have been studied in [9] by using this approach.
In this paper, we consider the non-ergodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process X = {Xt , t ≥ 0} given by
the following linear stochastic differential equation
X0 = 0;
dXt = θXt dt + dGt ,
t ≥ 0,
(1.1)
where G is a Gaussian process and θ > 0 is an unknown parameter.
A problem here is to estimate the parameter θ when one observes the whole trajectory of X. In
the case when the process X has Hölder continuous paths of order δ ∈ ( 12 , 1] we can consider the
following least squares estimator (LSE)
Rt
Xs dXs
b
θt = R0 t
,
2
0 Xs ds
t ≥ 0,
(1.2)
as estimator of θ, where the integral with respect to X is a Young integral (see Appendix). The
estimator θbt is obtained by the least squares technique, that is, θbt (formally) minimizes
θ 7−→
Z
t
0
2
Ẋs − θXs ds.
Moreover, using the formula (A-1) we can rewrite θbt as follows,
θbt =
X2
,
Rt t
2 0 Xs2 ds
θet =
X2
,
Rt t
2 0 Xs2 ds
t ≥ 0.
(1.3)
Motivated by (1.3) we propose to use, in the general case, the right hand of (1.3) as a statistic
to estimate the drift coefficient θ of the equation (1.1). More precisely, we define
t ≥ 0.
(1.4)
This estimator θet may exist even if X does not have Hölder continuous paths of order δ ∈ ( 12 , 1].
We shall provide sufficient conditions, based on the properties of G, under which the estimator θet is consistent (see Theorem 2.1), and the limit distribution of θet is a standard Cauchy
distribution (see Theorem 2.2).
Examples of the Gaussian process G.
Fractional Brownian motion:
Suppose that the process G given in (1.1) is a fractional Brownian motion with Hurst parameter
H ∈ (0, 1). By assuming that H > 12 , [4] studied the LSE θbt which coincides, in this case, with
θet by Remark 2.1. In this paper, we extend the result of [4] to the case H ∈ (0, 1). Moreover, we
offer an elementary proof (see Section 3.1).
2
Sub-fractional Brownian motion:
Assume that the process G given in (1.1) is a subfractional Brownian motion with parameter
H ∈ (0, 1). For H > 21 , using an idea of [4], [14] studied the LSE θbt which also coincides with
θet . But the proof of Lemma 4.3 in [14] relies on a possibly awed technique because the passage
R t θs H 2
−θt
from line -7 to -6 on page 671 does not allow to obtain the convergence of E e
0 e dSs
as t → ∞. In the present paper, we give a solution of this problem and we extend the result to
H ∈ (0, 1) (see Section 3.2).
Bifractional Brownian motion:
To the best of our knowledge there is no study of the problem of estimating the drift of (1.1) in
the case when G is a bifractional Brownian motion with parameters (H, K) ∈ (0, 1)2 . Section 3.3
is devoted to this question.
2
Asymptotic behavior of the estimator
Let G = (Gt , t ≥ 0) be a continuous centered Gaussian process defined on some probability space
(Ω, F, P ) (Here, and throughout the text, we assume that F is the sigma-field generated by G).
The following assumptions are required.
(H1) The process G has Hölder continuous paths of order δ ∈ (0, 1].
(H2) For every t ≥ 0, E G2t ≤ ct2γ for some positive constants c and γ.
2.1
Strong consistency
We will prove that the estimator θet given by (1.4) is strongly consistent.
It is clear that the linear equation (1.1) has the following explicit solution
Z t
θt
Xt = e
e−θs dGs ,
t ≥ 0,
(2.5)
0
where the integral is interpreted in the Young sense (see Appendix).
Suppose (H1) holds. Applying the formula (A-1) we can write
Xt = Gt + θeθt Zt ,
t ≥ 0,
(2.6)
where
Zt :=
Z
t
e−θs Gs ds,
0
t ≥ 0.
(2.7)
Let us introduce the following process
ξt :=
Z
t
e−θs dGs ,
0
t ≥ 0.
Thus, we can also write
ξt = e−θt Gt + θZt ,
3
t ≥ 0.
(2.8)
Remark 2.1. Suppose that G has Hölder continuous paths of order δ ∈ ( 21 , 1]. Then the process
X has δ-Hölder continuous paths which implies that the estimator θet coincides with the LSE
θbt by using (A-1). This property is satisfied in the cases of fractional Brownian motion with
Hurst parameter H > 21 , sub-fractional Brownian motion with parameter H > 12 and bifractional
Brownian motion with parameters (H, K) ∈ (0, 1)2 such that HK > 21 (see Section 3).
Indeed, let us prove that X has δ-Hölder continuous paths. From (2.6), it suffices to prove that
the process Z given in (2.7) has δ-Hölder continuous paths. Furthermore, Mean Value Theorem
and the continuity of G entail that Z has Hölder continuous paths of order 1. Thus, the result is
obtained.
The following theorem gives the strong consistency of the estimator θet .
Theorem 2.1. Assume that (H1) and (H2) hold and let θet be given by (1.4). Then
θet → θ almost surely as t → ∞.
(2.9)
In order to prove this theorem we make use of the following technical lemmas. We will analyze
separately the numerator and the denominator in the right hand side of the estimator (1.4). The
proofs of the following lemmas are given in Appendix.
Lemma
R ∞2.1. Assume that (H1) and (H2) hold. Let Z be the process defined in (2.7). Then,
Z∞ = 0 e−θs Gs ds is well-defined, and as t → ∞
Zt −→ Z∞
almost surely and in L2 (Ω).
(2.10)
Thus, as t → ∞
ξt −→ ξ∞ := θZ∞
almost surely and in L2 (Ω).
(2.11)
Lemma 2.2. Assume that (H1) and (H2) hold. Then, as t → ∞,
Z t
Z t
θ 2
ξ2
−2θt
2
−2θt
almost surely.
e
Xs ds = e
e2θs ξs2 ds −→ ∞ = Z∞
2θ
2
0
0
Proof of Theorem 2.1. By (2.6), we can write
2
Gt + θeθt Zt
ξ2
e
θt =
=
.
Rt
R tt
2 0 e2θs ξs2 ds
2e−2θt 0 e2θs ξs2 ds
(2.12)
The convergence (2.9) follows from Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2.
2.2
Asymptotic distribution
This section is devoted to the investigation of asymptotic distribution of the estimator θet of θ.
Then, the following assumptions are required.
Rt
(H3) The limiting variance of e−θt 0 eθs dGs exists as t → ∞, i.e., there exists a constant σG > 0
such that
"
2 #
Z
lim E
t→∞
t
e−θt
0
4
eθs dGs
2
−→ σG
.
(H4) For all fixed s ≥ 0
−θt
lim E Gs e
t→∞
Z
t
θr
e dGr
0
= 0.
The next theorem proves that θet is asymptotically Cauchy.
Theorem 2.2. Assume that (H1)-(H4) hold. Then, as t → ∞,
2σG
law
C(1),
eθt θet − θ −→ p
2 )
E (Z∞
with C(1) is the standard Cauchy distribution with the probability density function
(2.13)
1
;
π(1+x2 )
x ∈ R.
In order to prove this theorem we need the following lemmas. The proofs of these lemmas are
given in Appendix.
Lemma 2.3. Assume that (H1) holds. Then, for every t ≥ 0, we have
Z t
Z t
1 2
eθs dGs + Rt ,
Xs2 ds + θZt
Xt = θ
2
0
0
where
1
Rt := G2t − θ
2
Z
t
0
G2s ds
+θ
2
Z
t
ds
0
Z
s
drGs Gr e−θ(s−r) .
0
Lemma 2.4. Assume that (H1), (H3) and (H4) hold. Let F be any σ{G}-measurable random
variable such that P (F < ∞) = 1. Then, as t → ∞,
Z t
law
−θt
θs
F, e
e dGs −→ (F, σG N ) ,
0
where N ∼ N (0, 1) is independent of G.
Proof of Theorem 2.2. Using Lemma 2.3 we can write
Rt
e−θt 0 eθs dGs
θZtZ∞
e−θt Rt
θt e
×
+
e θt − θ
=
Rt
Rt
Z∞
e−2θt 0 Xs2 ds e−2θt 0 Xs2 ds
:= at × bt + ct .
Lemma 2.4 yields, as t → ∞,
law
at −→ σG
N
,
Z∞
where N ∼ N (0, 1) is independent of G, whereas Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2 imply that bt −→ 2 almost
surely as t → ∞. On the other hand , e−θt Rt −→ 0 in L1 (Ω) as t → ∞ because, as t → ∞,
e−θt E G2t ≤ ct2γ e−θt −→ 0,
Z t
t2γ+1 −θt
e−θt
E G2s ds ≤ c
e
−→ 0,
2γ + 1
0
5
and
e−θt
Z
t
ds
Z
0
0
s
drE |Gs Gr | e−θ(s−r) ≤ ce−θt
Z
t
ds
0
Z
s
dr(sr)γ =
0
ct2γ+2
e−θt −→ 0.
(γ + 1)(2γ + 2)
Combining this with Lemma 2.2, we obtain that ct −→ 0 in probability as t → ∞.
By plugging all these convergences together, we get that, as t → ∞,
N
law
.
eθt θet − θ −→ 2σG
Z∞
2
Moreover, Z∞ ∼ N 0, E Z∞
, which completes the proof.
3
Applications to fractional Gaussian processes
This section is devoted to some examples of the Gaussian process G given in (1.1). We will need
the following technical lemmas.
Lemma 3.1. Let g : [0, ∞) × [0, ∞) −→ R be a symmetric function such that ∂g
∂s (s, r) and
∂2g
∂s∂r (s, r) exist on (0, ∞) × [0, ∞). Then, for every t ≥ 0,
Z t
Z tZ t
−θt
θs
2 −2θt
∆g (t) := g(t, t) − 2θe
g(s, t)e ds + θ e
g(s, r)eθ(s+r) drds
0
0
0
Z t
Z s
Z t
∂2g
−2θt
θs
−2θt
θs ∂g
(s, 0)ds + 2e
(s, r)eθr .
(3.14)
dse
dr
= 2e
e
∂s
∂s∂r
0
0
0
Rs
Proof. Set h(s) := 0 g(s, r)eθr dr. Combining the integration by parts formula together with
Z s
∂g
∂h
θs
(s) = e g(s, s) +
(s, r)eθr dr,
∂s
0 ∂s
we obtain
Z t
Z t
Z s
∂g
∆g (t) = g(t, t) − 2θe−2θt
g(s, s)e2θs ds − 2θe−2θt
dseθs
dr (s, r)eθr
∂s
0
0
0
Z t
Z s
Z t
∂g(s, s)
∂g
(s)e2θs ds − 2θe−2θt
dseθs
= e−2θt
dr (s, r)eθr .
∂s
∂s
0
0
0
∂g(s,s)
∂g(s,s)
Since g is symmetric, 2 ∂g
is the derivative of the function
∂s (s, r)1{r=s} =
∂s (s) where
∂s
s −→ g(s, s). Thus by using again the integration by parts formula, the claim (3.14) is obtained.
Lemma 3.2. Let λ > −1. Define
Z tZ t
−2θt
Jλ (t) := e
eθs eθr |s − r|λ drds;
0
0
Then
lim Jλ (t) = lim
t→∞
t→∞
−θt
Iλ (t) := e
Z
1
Γ(λ + 1)
Iλ (t) =
.
θ
θ λ+2
6
0
t
eθr (t − r)λ dr.
(3.15)
Proof. Let t ≥ 0. We have
Jλ (t)
=
−2θt
2e
Z
t
θs
dse
0
2e−2θt
Z
Z
0
t
dse2θs
Z
s
dreθr (s − r)λ
s
dre−θu uλ
0
0
Z t
Z t
−2θt
−θu λ
= 2e
due u
dse2θs
0
u
Z t
Z t
1
λ −θu
−2θt
λ θu
u e du − e
u e du
=
θ
0
0
Γ(λ + 1)
→
as t → ∞,
θ λ+2
=
which proves (3.15).
3.1
Fractional Brownian motion
The fractional Brownian motion (fBm) B H = BtH , t ≥ 0 with Hurst parameter H ∈ (0, 1) is
defined as a centered Gaussian process starting from zero with covariance
1 2H
E BtH BsH =
t + s2H − |t − s|2H .
2
1
Note that, when H = 21 , B 2 is a standard Brownian motion.
Proposition 3.1. Suppose that, in (1.1), the process G is the fBm B H . Then for all fixed
H ∈ (0, 1) the convergences (2.9) and (2.13) hold.
Proof. By Kolmogorov’s continuity criterion and the fact
2
E BtH − BsH = |s − t|2H ; s, t ≥ 0,
we deduce that B H has Hölder continuous paths of order H − ε for all ε ∈ (0, H). So, the process
B H satisfies the assumptions (H1) and (H2). Thus the strong consistence (2.9) is obtained in
the case when G = B H .
For the convergence
it suffices to check (H3) and (H4). Let us first compute the limiting
R t θs(2.13),
−θt
H
variance of e
0 e dBs as t → ∞. We have
"
"
2 #
2 #
Z
Z
E
t
e−θt
0
eθs dBsH
e−θt eθt BtH − θ
=E
t
0
eθs BsH ds
Z t
Z tZ t
= t2H − 2θe−θt
eθs E(BsH BtH )ds + θ 2 e−2θt
eθs eθr E(BsH Br )dsdr
0
0
0
Z t
= t2H − θe−θt
eθs s2H + t2H − (t − s)2H ds
0
Z tZ t
1
eθs eθr s2H + r 2H − |r − s|2H dsdr
+ θ 2 e−2θt
2
0
0
θ2
= ∆gBH (t) + θI2H (t) − J2H (t),
2
7
(3.16)
where gB H (s, r) = 21 s2H + t2H .
On the other hand, (3.14) implies that
∆gBH (t) = 2He−2θt
Z
t
0
s2H−1 eθs ds → 0 as t → ∞.
Combining (3.15)-(3.17), we get for every H ∈ (0, 1)
"
2 #
Z t
HΓ(2H)
−θt
θs
H
E
−→
e
e dBs
θ 2H
0
(3.17)
as t → ∞.
Hence, to finish the proof it remains to check that, for all fixed s ≥ 0
Z t
H −θt
θr
H
lim E Bs e
e dBr = 0.
t→∞
0
Let us consider s < t. Setting fB H (s, r) = E(BsH BrH ), it follows from (A-1) that
Z t
Z t
E BsH e−θt
eθr dBrH
= fB H (s, t) − θe−θt
eθr fB H (s, r)dr
0
0
Z t
Z s
−θt
−θt
θr
= fB H (s, t) − θe
e fB H (s, r)dr − θe
eθr fB H (s, r)dr
s
0
Z s
Z t
∂f
H
B
−θt
−θt
−θ(t−s)
θr
(s, r)dr − θe
eθr fB H (s, r)dr.
= e
fB H (s, s) + e
e
∂r
0
s
Rs
It is clear that e−θ(t−s) fB H (s, s) − θe−θt 0 eθr fB H (s, r)dr −→ 0 as t → ∞.
Furthermore, if H = 12 ,
∂fBH
∂r
(s, r) = 0 for every r > s. Then, for H =
Z t
∂f H
−θt
e
eθr B (s, r)dr = 0.
∂r
s
Now, suppose that H ∈ (0, 12 ) ∪ ( 21 , 1). Since
Z t
eθr r 2H−1 − (r − s)2H−1 dr
s
≥
≥
Z
1
2
t
eθr r 2H−2 dr
s
Z t
2H−2
|2H − 1|st
eθr dr
|2H − 1|s
s
→ ∞ as t → ∞,
we can apply L’Hôspital’s rule to obtain
Z t
∂f H
−θt
eθr B (s, r)dr =
lim e
t→∞
∂r
s
Z
t
eθr r 2H−1 − (r − s)2H−1 dr
lim He
t→∞
s
Z t
≤ lim He−θt
eθr r 2H−1 − (r − s)2H−1 dr
t→∞
s
H 2H−1
2H−1
t
− (t − s)
= lim
t→∞
θ
sH|2H − 1|
2H−2
(t − s)
≤ lim
t→∞
θ
→ 0 as t → ∞,
(3.18)
−θt
which finishes the proof of Proposition 3.1.
8
3.2
Sub-fractional Brownian motion
The sub-fractional Brownian motion (sfBm) S H with parameter H ∈ (0, 1) is a centred Gaussian
process with covariance function
1
(t + s)2H + |t − s|2H .
E StH SsH = t2H + s2H −
2
1
Note that, when H = 21 , S 2 is a standard Brownian motion.
Proposition 3.2. Suppose that, in (1.1), the process G is the sfBm S H . Then for all fixed
H ∈ (0, 1) the convergences (2.9) and (2.13) hold.
Proof. By Kolmogorov’s continuity criterion and the fact
E StH − SsH
2
≤ (2 − 22H−1 )|s − t|2H ; s, t ≥ 0,
we deduce that S H has Hölder continuous paths of order H − ε for all ε ∈ (0, H). So, the process
S H satisfies the assumptions (H1) and (H2). Thus, by Theorem 2.1 the convergence (2.9) is
obtained.
To prove (2.13), it suffices to check (H3) and (H4). The case H = 21 has already been established
above. Suppose now that H ∈ (0, 21 ) ∪ ( 21 , 1). Using the same argument as in (3.16), we get
"
2 #
Z t
θ2
−θt
θs
H
E
= ∆gS H (t) + θI2H (t) − J2H (t),
e
e dSs
(3.19)
2
0
where gS H (s, r) = s2H + t2H − 21 (s + t)2H .
Moreover, we have
Z t
Z t
Z
∆gS H (t) = 2He−2θt
s2H−1 eθs ds − 2H(2H − 1)e−2θt
dseθs
0
0
s
dreθr (s + r)2H−2 .
0
Rt
It is easy to see that 2He−2θt 0 s2H−1 eθs ds → 0 as t → ∞.
Furthermore, using the fact that
Z t
Z s
Z t
Z
dseθs
dreθr (s + r)2H−2 ≥ (2t)2H−2
dseθs
0
0
0
=
(2t)2H−2
Z
2
0
→ ∞ as t → ∞,
L’Hôspital’s rule entails
Z t
Z
lim e−2θt
dseθs
t→∞
0
0
s
θr
2H−2
dre (s + r)
9
t
s
0
e2θs ds
dreθr
2
Z
1 −θt t θr
2H−2
=
lim
e
e (t + r)
dr
t→∞ 2θ
0
2H−2
Z t
t
−θt
θr
e
e dr
≤
lim
t→∞
2θ
0
→ 0 as t → ∞.
Thus, we deduce that
∆gS H (t) → 0 as t → ∞.
Combining (3.19), (3.20) and (3.15) we get
"
2 #
Z t
−θt
θs
H
E
e
e dSs
−→
0
HΓ(2H)
θ 2H
(3.20)
as t → ∞.
Hence, to finish the proof it remains to check that, for all fixed s ≥ 0
Z t
H −θt
θr
H
lim E Ss e
e dSr = 0.
t→∞
0
Let us consider s < t and let fS H (s, r) = E(SsH SrH ). Then, as in the fBm case, we can write
Z s
Z t
Z t
−θt
H −θt
θr
H
−θ(t−s)
−θt
θr ∂fS H
(s, r)dr − θe
eθr fS H (s, r)dr.
E Ss e
e dSr
= e
f (s, s) + e
e
∂r
0
0
s
R
s
It is clear that e−θ(t−s) fS H (s, s) − θe−θt 0 eθr fS H (s, r)dr −→ 0 as t → ∞.
On the other hand, since
Z
Z t
H −θt t θr
−θt
θr ∂fS H
(s, r)dr = e
e 2r 2H−1 − (r + s)2H−1 − (r − s)2H−1 dr,
e
e
∂r
2
s
s
the same argument as in (3.18) leads to
Z t
∂f H
−θt
e
eθr S (s, r)dr −→ 0
∂r
s
as t → ∞,
which finishes the proof.
3.3
Bifractional Browian motion
Let B H,K = BtH,K , t ≥ 0 be a bifractional Brownian motion (bifBm) with parameters H ∈ (0, 1)
and K ∈ (0, 1]. This means that B H,K is a centered Gaussian process with the covariance function
K
1
E(BsH,K BtH,K ) = K t2H + s2H
− |t − s|2HK .
2
The case K = 1 corresponds to the fBm with Hurst parameter H. The process B H,K verifies
2
H,K
H,K
− Bs
E Bt
≤ 21−K |t − s|2HK ,
so B H,K has (HK − ε)−Hölder continuous paths for any ε ∈ (0, HK) thanks to Kolmogorov’s
continuity criterion. The bifBm B H,K can be extended for 1 < K < 2 with H ∈ (0, 1) and
HK ∈ (0, 1) (see [3] and [13]).
Proposition 3.3. Suppose that, in (1.1), the process G is the bifBm B H,K . Then the convergences (2.9) and (2.13) hold true for all fixed (H, K) ∈ (0, 1)2 .
10
Proof. Since B H,K has Hölder continuous paths of order HK − ε for all ε ∈ (0, HK), it satisfies
the assumptions (H1) and (H2). Thus the convergence (2.9) is satisfied.
To prove (2.13), it suffices to check (H3) and (H4). Using the same argument as in (3.16), we
have
"
2 #
Z t
−θt
θs
H,K
E
e
= ∆gBH,K (t) + 21−K θI2HK (t) − 2−K θ 2 J2HK (t),
(3.21)
e dBs
0
where gB H,K (s, r) =
On the other hand,
1
2K
s2H + r 2H
2−K
K
−2θt
Z
.
t
s2HK−1 eθs ds
0
Z t
Z
3−K 2
−2θt
θs
−2
H K(K − 1)e
dse
∆gBH,K (t) = 2
HKe
0
s
dreθr (sr)2H−1 s2H + r 2H
0
K−2
.
Rt
The convergence 22−K HKe−2θt 0 s2HK−1 eθs ds → 0 as t → ∞ is immediate.
Also, it is straightforward to check that there exists a constant CH,K depending on H, K such
that
Z t
Z s
Z s
Z t
θs
θs
θr
2H−1
2H
2H K−2
2HK−2
dse
dreθr
dse
dre (sr)
s +r
≥
CH,K t
0
s
2
t
2
0
≥
→∞
CH,K 2HK−2
t
2
as t → ∞.
Z
t
3θ
se 2 s ds
t
2
So, we can apply L’Hôspital’s rule to obtain
Z t
Z s
−2θt
θs
θr
2H−1
2H
2H K−2
lim e
dse
dre (sr)
s +r
t→∞
0
0
−θt Z t
K−2
e
eθr (tr)2H−1 t2H + r 2H
dr
=
lim
t→∞
2θ 0
K−3 −θt Z t
2
e
θr
HK−1
≤
lim
e (tr)
dr
t→∞
θ
0
K−3 2HK−2
Z t
2
t
−θt
θr
e
e dr
≤
lim
t→∞
θ
0
→ 0 as t → ∞.
Hence, for every (H, K) ∈ (0, 1)2
∆gBH,K (t) → 0 as t → ∞.
Consequently, (3.21), (3.22) and (3.15) imply
"
2 #
Z t
−θt
θs
H,K
E
e
−→
e dBs
0
11
HKΓ(2HK)
θ 2HK
(3.22)
as t → ∞.
Hence, to finish the proof it remains to check that, for all fixed s ≥ 0
Z t
H,K −θt
θr
H,K
lim E Bs e
e dBr
= 0.
t→∞
0
Let us consider s < t and let fB H,K (s, r) = E(BsH,K BrH,K ). Then, as in the fBm case, we can
write
Z t
H,K −θt
θr
H,K
E Bs e
e dBr
0
Z s
Z t
−θt
−θt
−θ(t−s)
θr ∂fB H,K
(s, r)dr − θe
eθr fB H,K (s, r)dr.
= e
fB H,K (s, s) + e
e
∂r
0
s
R
s
We have e−θ(t−s) fB H,K (s, s) − θe−θt 0 eθr fB H,K (s, r)dr −→ 0 as t → ∞.
Also,
Z t
Z t
K−1
1−K
−θt
−θt
θr ∂fB H,K
(s, r)dr = 2
HKe
− (r − s)2HK−1 dr.
eθr r 2H−1 s2H + r 2H
e
e
∂r
s
s
Hence, if HK < 12 , L’Hôspital’s rule leads to
Z t
Z t
1−K
−θt
−θt
θr ∂fB H,K
(s, r)dr
≤ 2
HKe
eθr r 2HK−1 + (r − s)2HK−1 dr
e
e
∂r
s
s
Z t
≤ 22−K HKe−θt
eθr (r − s)2HK−1 dr
s
2−K
2
HK
2HK−1
(t − s)
= 0 as t → ∞.
−→ lim
t→∞
θ
If HK = 12 ,
e−θt
Z
t
s
∂f H,K
eθr B
(s, r)dr
∂r
=
2−K e−θt
Z
t
eθr
s
−→ 0
as t → ∞.
1− 1+
s 2H K−1
r
The last convergence comes from the fact that for r large,
s 2H K−1
s K−1
s
≤1− 1+
∼ (1 − K) ,
1− 1+
r
r
r
!
dr
and L’Hôspital’s rule. Similarly, if HK > 21 ,
Z t
∂f H,K
e−θt
eθr B
(s, r)dr
∂r
s
Z t
s 2H K−1
s 2HK−1
1−K
−θt
θr 2HK−1
− 1−
dr
≤ 2
HKe
e r
1+
r
r
s
−→ 0
as t → ∞,
which completes the proof.
12
Acknowledgement : The authors would like to thank the editor and two anonymous referees
for their careful reading of the manuscript and for their valuable suggestions and remarks. The
second author would also like to acknowledge the financial support of the University of Rouen.
The third author was supported by Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology.
Appendix
In this section we present some calculations used in the paper.
For any α ∈ (0, 1], we denote by H α ([0, T ]) the set of α-Hölder continuous functions, that is,
the set of functions f : [0, T ] → R such that
|f |α :=
sup
0≤s<t≤T
|f (t) − f (s)|
< ∞.
(t − s)α
We also set |f |∞ = supt∈[0,T ] |f (t)|, and we equip H α ([0, T ]) with the norm kf kα := |f |α + |f |∞ .
Let f ∈ H α ([0, T ]), and consider the operator Tf : C 1 ([0, T ]) → C 0 ([0, T ]) defined as
Z t
Tf (g)(t) =
f (u)g ′ (u)du, t ∈ [0, T ].
0
It can be shown (see, e.g., [15, Section 3.1]) that, for any β ∈ (1 − α, 1), there exists a constant
Cα,β,T > 0 depending only on α, β and T such that, for any g ∈ H β ([0, T ]),
Z ·
f (u)g′ (u)du ≤ Cα,β,T kf kα kgkβ .
0
β
We deduce that, for any α ∈ (0, 1), any f ∈ H α ([0, T ]) and anyRβ ∈ (1− α, 1), the linear operator
·
Tf : C 1 ([0, T ]) ⊂ H β ([0, T ]) → H β ([0, T ]), defined as Tf (g) = 0 f (u)g′ (u)du, is continuous with
respect to the norm k · kβ . By density, it extends (in an unique way) to an operator defined on
H β . As consequence,
if f ∈ H α ([0, T ]), if g ∈ H β ([0, T ]) and if α + β > 1, then the (so-called)
R·
Young integral 0 f (u)dg(u) is well-defined as being Tf (g).
The Young integral obeys the followingR formula. Let
f ∈ H α ([0, T ]) with α ∈ (0, 1) and
R
.
.
g ∈ H β ([0, T ]) for all β ∈ (0, 1). Then 0 gu dfu and 0 fu dgu are well-defined as the Young
integrals. Moreover, for all t ∈ [0, T ],
Z t
Z t
fu dgu .
(A-1)
gu dfu +
ft gt = f0 g0 +
0
0
R∞
Proof of Lemma 2.1. We first notice that the integral Z∞ = 0 e−θs Gs ds is well-defined because
Z ∞
Z ∞
√
−θs
sγ e−θs ds < ∞.
e E(|Gs |)ds ≤ c
0
0
Now, we prove (2.10). By using Borel-Cantelli’s lemma, it is sufficient to prove that, for any
ε > 0,
Z ∞
X
−θs
P
sup
e Gs ds > ε < ∞.
n≥0
n≤t≤n+1
t
13
Notice that for every ε > 0,
E
sup
Z
n≤t≤n+1
∞
e−θs Gs ds
t
≤ E
√
Z
Z
∞
n
∞
e−θs |Gs | ds
e−θs sγ ds
n
Z
√ −θn ∞ −θs γ
≤
e 2 s ds
ce 2
0
1+γ
√
θ
2
cΓ (1 + γ)
=
e− 2 n .
θ
≤
Consequently,
X
P
sup
n≥0
n≤t≤n+1
Z
∞
−θs
e
t
dGs
c
X
−1
E
sup
>ε
≤ ε
n≤t≤n+1
n≥0
Z
∞
−θs
e
t
dGs
1+γ X
θ
2
cΓ (1 + γ)
e− 2 n < ∞,
θ
−1 √
≤ ε
n≥0
which implies that Zt −→ Z∞ almost surely as t → ∞. Moreover, since
Z ∞Z ∞
i
h
=
e−θr e−θs E (Gr Gs ) drds
E (Zt − Z∞ )2
t
Z ∞ tZ ∞
≤ c
e−θr e−θs (rs)γ drds
t
t
2
Z ∞
e−θs sγ ds
= c
t
→ 0 as t → ∞,
the proof of the claim (2.10) is finished. The convergence (2.11) is a direct consequence of (2.10)
and (2.8). Thus the proof of Lemma 2.1 is done.
2
Proof of Lemma 2.2. It follows from (2.11) that ξ∞ ∽ N 0, E ξ∞
, where
Z ∞Z ∞
2
2
E ξ∞
= θ 2 E Z∞
= θ2
e−θr e−θs E (Gr Gs ) drds
0
0
Z ∞Z ∞
2
≤ cθ
e−θr e−θs (rs)γ drds
0
0
Γ(γ + 1) 2
< ∞.
= c
θγ
This implies that
P (ξ∞ = 0) = 0.
The continuity of ξ entails that, for every t ≥ 0
Z t
Z t
t
e2θs ξs2 ds ≥
e2θs ξs2 ds ≥ eθt
t
2
0
2
14
inf
t
≤s≤t
2
(A-2)
ξs2
!
almost surely.
(A-3)
Furthermore, the continuity of ξ and (2.11) yield
!
inf ξs2
lim
t→∞
t
≤s≤t
2
2
= ξ∞
almost surely.
Combining this last convergence with (A-2) and (A-3), we deduce that
Z t
lim
e2θs ξs2 ds = ∞ almost surely.
t→∞ 0
Hence, we can use L’Hôspital’s rule to obtain
R t 2θs 2
e ξ ds
ξ2
ξ2
lim 0 2θt s
= lim t = ∞ almost surely,
t→∞
t→∞ 2θ
e
2θ
which completes the proof of Lemma 2.2.
Rt
Proof of Lemma 2.3. Let t ≥ 0. Setting ηt = 0 Xs ds, the equation (1.1) leads to
1 2 1 2 2 1 2
X = θ ηt + Gt + θηt Gt .
2 t
2
2
Moreover, (A-1) and (1.1) entail
Z t
Z t
Z t
Z t
1 2
−1
2
Gs Xs ds .
ηs Xs ds = θ
Xs ds −
ηs dηs =
η =
2 t
0
0
0
0
Rt
Define Yt := 0 eθs Gs ds. Then, by (2.6) and (A-1)
Z t
Z t
Gs Gs + θeθs Zs ds
Gs Xs ds =
0
0
Z t
Z t
eθs Gs Zs ds
G2s ds + θ
=
0
0
Z t
Z t
Zs dYs
G2s ds + θ
=
0
0
Z t
Z t
Ys dZs
G2s ds + θZt Yt − θ
=
0
0
Z t Z s
Z t
2
drGs Gr e−θ(s−r) .
ds
Gs ds + θZt Yt − θ
=
0
0
0
Thus, we deduce that
1 2
X =θ
2 t
Z
0
t
Xs2 ds − θ 2 Zt Yt + θηt Gt + Rt .
(A-4)
On the other hand, by (1.1) and (2.6) we get
θηt Gt = Gt (Xt − Gt ) = −θeθt Gt Zt .
This implies that
2
θt
−θ Zt Yt + θηt Gt = −θZt(θYt − e Gt ) = θZt
Combining this with (A-4) the proof of Lemma 2.3 is done.
15
Z
0
t
eθs dGs .
Proof of Lemma 2.4. For any d ≥ 1, s1 . . . sd ∈ [0, ∞), we shall prove that, as t → ∞,
Z t
law
−θt
θs
Bs 1 , . . . , Bs d , e
e dGs −→ (Bs1 , . . . , Bsd , σG N ) ,
(A-5)
0
which is enough to lead to the desired conclusion. Because the left-hand side in the previous
convergence is a Gaussian vector (see proof of Lemma 7 in [8]), to get (A-5) it is sufficient to
check the convergence of its covariance matrix. Thus, the assumptions (H3) and (H4) complete
the proof.
References
[1] Azmoodeh, E. and Morlanes, I. (2013). Drift parameter estimation for fractional OrnsteinUhlenbeck process of the Second Kind. Statistics: A Journal of Theoretical and Applied
Statistics. DOI: 10.1080/02331888.2013.863888.
[2] Azmoodeh, E. and Viitasaari, L. (2015). Parameter estimation based on discrete observations
of fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process of the second kind. Statistical Inference for Stochastic
Processes, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 205-227.
[3] Bardina, X. and Es-Sebaiy, K. (2011). An extension of bifractional Brownian motion. Communications on Stochastic Analysis, 5, pp. 333-340.
[4] Belfadli, R., Es-Sebaiy, K. and Ouknine, Y. (2011). Parameter estimation for fractional
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes: Non-ergodic case. Frontiers in Science and Engineering (An
International Journal Edited by Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology). 1, no. 1,
1-16.
[5] Cénac, P. and Es-Sebaiy, K. (2015). Almost sure central limit theorems for random ratios and
applications to LSE for fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. Probability and Mathematical Statistics, to appear.
[6] El Onsy, B., Es-Sebaiy, K. and Viens, F. (2014). Parameter estimation for a partially observed
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with long-memory noise. Preprint.
[7] El Onsy, B., Es-Sebaiy, K. and Tudor, C. (2014). Statistical analysis of the non-ergodic
fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process of the second kind. Preprint.
[8] Es-Sebaiy, K. and Nourdin, I. (2013). Parameter estimation for α-fractional bridges. Springer
Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics Volume 34, pp 385-412.
[9] Es-Sebaiy, K. and Viens, F. (2015). Parameter estimation for SDEs related to stationary
Gaussian processes. Preprint.
[10] Hu, Y. and Nualart, D. (2010). Parameter estimation for fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck
processes. Statistics and Probability Letters 80, 1030-1038.
16
[11] Hu, Y. and Song, J. (2013). Parameter estimation for fractional Ornstein- Uhlenbeck processes with discrete observations. F. Viens et al (eds), Malliavin Calculus and Stochastic
Analysis: A Festschrift in Honor of David Nualart, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and
Statistics 34, 427-442.
[12] Kleptsyna, M. and Le Breton, A. (2002). Statistical analysis of the fractional OrnsteinUhlenbeck type process. Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes 5, 229-241.
[13] Lifshits, M. and Volkova, K. (2015). Bifractional Brownian Motion: Existence and Border
Cases. Preprint, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.02217.pdf.
[14] Mendy, I. (2013). Parametric estimation for sub-fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 143, 663-674.
[15] Nourdin, I. (2012). Selected aspects of fractional Brownian motion. Bocconi & Springer Series
4. Springer, Milan; Bocconi University Press, Milan.
[16] Tudor, C. and Viens, F. (2007). Statistical aspects of the fractional stochastic calculus. Ann.
Statist. 35, no. 3, 1183-1212.
[17] Young, L. C. (1936). An inequality of the Hölder type connected with Stieltjes integration.
Acta Math. 67, 251-282.
17
| 10math.ST
|
Exploratory Data Analysis of The KelvinHelmholtz
instability in Jets
arXiv:1503.06331v1 [cs.CE] 21 Mar 2015
Santosh Tirunagari
Department of Computing & CVSSP
University of Surrey
Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
The KelvinHelmholtz (KH) instability is a fundamental wave instability that is frequently observed in all kinds
of shear layer (jets, wakes, atmospheric air currents etc). The study of KH-instability, coherent flow structures has
a major impact in understanding the fundamentals of fluid dynamics. Therefore there is a need for methods that
can identify and analyse these structures. In this Final assignment, we use machine-learning methods such as Proper
Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) and Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) to analyse the coherent flow structures.
We used a 2D co-axial jet as our data, with Reynolds number corresponding to Re: 10,000. Results for POD modes
and DMD modes are discussed and compared.
I.
I NTRODUCTION
The KelvinHelmholtz (KH) instability can occur when there is passive scalar shear in a single continuous
fluid, or where there is a passive scalar difference across the interface between two fluids [1]. To gain
deeper understanding on KH coherent flow strcutures, machine-learning methods can be utilised. This field
allows computers to adopt behaviors based on training data. These methods recognize complex patterns
and makes intelligent decisions based on data [2]. These techniques include: reduced order models or
dimensionality reduction methods [3], statistical, and machine vision methods. Dimensionality reduction is
a technique used to find a reduced order model on a given data. Such a technique includes feature selection
and feature extraction methods. Feature selection is based on selecting a subset of variables which best
define the data, whereas feature extraction transforms the data from high-dimensional space to a space
of fewer dimensions [2]. The data transformation may be linear, as in Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
(POD) [4] [5] [6] and may be non-linear such as in Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) [7] [8] [6].
From the literature, it is expected that POD and DMD would be good methods for analyzing the flow
structures. For example, Perrin et. al [4] used POD to obtain phase averaged turbulence properties for flow
past a cylinder. In highly turbulent flows, the coherent flow structures are difficult to identify due to the
combination of organized and chaotic fluctuating motions. Using POD analysis it is shown in [9], that
von Karman vortices can be reproduced within the first few modes. POD has been used as a tool for the
comparison of Particle Image Velocimetry1 (PIV) and Light Eddy Simulation(LES) data in [10] and it is
also shown that POD modes have a good qualitative agreement between PIV and LES. A paper by Schmidt
et. al [11], used DMD to a sequence of flow images of a slow jet entering quiescent fluid showcased the
detection of dynamically relevant coherent structures that play an important role in characterizing the fluid
behaviour over processed time interval. To identify the KH coherent flow structures, we study 2 cases of
co-axial jet:
•
1
When both the jets are close to each other (CASE =
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle image velocimetry
L
).
10
•
When both the jets are independent, far a part from each other (CASE =
L
).
5
where L is the domain side length i.e 2π or 256 pixels, as the grid resolution N is 28 pixels. Both the
cases of co-axial jet are studied at Reynolds number corresponding to Re: 10,000. The inverse momentum
L
thickness or the steepness parameter B = 10.5, the jet diameter ro is kept constant at 20
. The U ,V and P S
for a co-axial jet are defined as follows:
Umax = 0.1; Vmax=Umax/30; ro = L/20;
y1= L/2 - CASE; y2= L/2 + CASE;
U = Umax*0.5*(1-tanh(B*(abs(Y-y1)./ro - ro./abs(Y-y1))));
U = U+Umax*0.5*(1-tanh(B*(abs(Y-y2)./ro - ro./abs(Y-y2))));
U = Umax*U/max(max(U));
V = Vmax*(rand(N,N)-0.5);
PS = U/max(max(U));
Figure 1 shows the mean profile for the two cases investigated in this report. The interactions between
the jets in case 1 starts at step 40, whereas in case 2 it is at time step 100.
Fig. 1.
Mean Profiles of case 1 (left) and case 2 ( right) passive scalar fields
The objectives of the paper is as follows:
•
POD and DMD is implemented with Matlab and used to analyse LES of subsonic jet.
•
The potential of POD and DMD in the ICE applications is pointed out.
•
Results for POD and DMD are discussed and compared.
The organisation of this report is as follows: In section 2 we study the computational methods for POD
and DMD. Section 3 deals with the experiments and implemention details. Finally, conclusions are drawn
and further research directions are discussed in section 4.
II.
C OMPUTATIONAL M ETHODS
In this section, the POD and DMD methods are discussed.
A. POD (Method of Snapshots)
POD was first introduced in the field of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) by Lumley [12]. POD is
known by various names like KLD, Principle Componant Analysis (PCA) and Singular Value Decompostion
(SVD). This method aims at representing a 2D or 3D flow field in terms of orthogonal modes which
correspond to the energitic, coherent flow motions. Hence, POD may be used to extract certain derterministic
features from turbulent data. POD theory is best described in [9]. The present day analysis uses method
of snapshots introduced by Sirovich [13]. Here LES data at a particular interval of time, interpolated on a
uniform grid is considered to be one snapshot. This method was introduced to reduce the POD computations.
To compute the POD using the original method requires solving n×n eigenvalue problem. The main problem
is the calculation of auto-covariance matrix R. Method of snapshots proposes that auto-covariance matrix
can be approximated by a summation of ’snapshots’. Here x is snapshot matrix.
M
1 X n n
x x
Rij =
M n=1 i j
(1)
The snapshots are assumed to be distanced of spatial distance greater than the correlation distance. Nowadays
this method has become extremely popular [14] [9] [15]. Its use in certain flows are questionable however,
due to its assumption of the snapshots being uncorrelated. This discussion is briefly explained in [9].
B. Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD)
The mathematics underlying the extraction of dynamic information from time-resolved snapshots of LES
data is closely related to the idea underlying the Arnoldi algorithm. Let vj denote each instantaneous flow
field. A sequence of N is writen as :
V1N = [v1 v2 v3 v4 · · · vN ]
(2)
A linear mapping from one snapshot to another is assummed.
V1N = [v1 Av1 A2 v1 A3 v1 · · · AN −1 v1 ]
(3)
This can further more assumed to be a constant, so that the mapping A can be represented as:
vj+1 = Avj
(4)
By the linear combination of available data fields, we have a standard Arlondi iteration problem [8].
AviN −1 ≈ viN −1 S
(5)
where S is a companion matrix that simply shifts the snapshots 1 through N − 1 and approximates the
last snapshot N by a linear combination of previous N − 1 snapshots. Hence this procedure will result in
the low dimensional system matrix S. We solve the S matrix problem using eigenvalue analysis and obtain
the eigenvalues. It is known that eigenvalues of S, approximate some of the eigenvalues of the full system
A. The associated eigenvectors of S provide the coefficients of the linear combination that is necessary to
express the modal structure in the snapshot basis. S matrix is calculated as follows:
S = R−1 Q∗ vN
(6)
where Q∗ is the complex conjugate transpose of Q from the QR-decomposition of V1N −1 .
III.
E XPERIMENTS AND I MPLEMENTATION
Here we discuss the Experimental and implementation details of POD and DMD on 2D co-axial jet data.
Fig. 2.
case 1 (left) and case 2 (right).
A. Pre-Processing
Figure 2 shows 2D co-axial jet for both the cases. A total of 30 snapshots were considered with a time
interval of 5 steps.
Consider an example of a smoke in the wind flow, the concentration of the smoke C at a particluar time
~ = C(P,
~
t, is given by C
t). As part of experiments, snapshot matrix X is constructed at first. Let P be the
scalar concentration component:
1
P1 P12 ... P1N
..
..
..
(7)
C = [P 1 P 2 P 3 · · · P N ] = ...
.
.
.
N
2
1
PM PM ... PM
B. Implementation of POD
The fluctuating passive scalar matrix U is calculated by substracting the mean from individual snapshots.
Then the autocovariance matrix is computed as:
C = UT U
(8)
The eigenvalue problem for the matrix reads as follows:
CAi = λi Ai
(9)
The eigenvectors are arranged according to the decreasing order of eigenvalues reflecting the energies in
different POD modes.
λ1 > λ2 > λ3 > λ4 > · · · λN = 0.
(10)
Using the ordered eigenvectors the POD modes are constructed.
PN
i
φ =
k
Pn=1
N
n=1
Ain U n
Ain U n k
,
i = 1, 2, · · · , N.
(11)
C. Implementation of DMD
Calculation of fluctuating passive scalar matrix is not needed. But the snapshot matrix is divided into two
parts.
(12)
V1n−1 = [v1 v2 v3 · · · vn−1 ]
V2n = [v2 v3 v4 · · · vn ]
(13)
QR decomposition in economy mode is performed as :
[Q, R] = qr(V1n−1 , 0).
(14)
S = R−1 Q∗ V2n .
(15)
Companion matrix S is calculated as :
The eigenvalue analysis is computed on S matrix
[X, D] = eig(S)
(16)
The dynamic mode spectrum is computed as :
λj = log(Djj )/δt.
(17)
δt, is the time interval between the snapshots. The Dynamic modes can be computed as follows:
DMj = ViN −1 X(:, j)
(18)
where X is the original snapshot matrix. Dynamic mode decomposition contains not only information
about coherent structures, but also about their temporal evolution. Since at no stage of the algorithm the
system matrix A is needed, various extensions and attractive features of the algorithm should be noted. No
specific spatial arrangement of the sampled data is assumed, and the processing of subdomain data, i.e., data
extracted only in a small region of the complete flow domain, as well as the processing of unstructured data
is possible. This feature allows to probe a subregion of the flow as to the presence of a specific mechanism.
IV.
R ESULTS AND D ISCUSSION
The POD modes are the optimal decomposition for the flow and capture large scale structures thereby
providing information on the large scale behaviour. Total kinetic energy is contained within the first few
POD modes. Generally 95% of the total intensity fluctuations is used and the average flow field is described
in the first n POD modes. Dynamic modes represent the perturbation dynamics and capture the characteristic
pattern located near the shear layer. DMD spectrum quantatively describes the jet behaviour. Higher the
dynamic modes higher the is the frequency.
From the Figure 3, it is observed from POD modes, that there is a formation of symmetric structures of
inverse Kelvin Helmholz instability due to interactions of both the jets. But from Dynamic modes, the
inverse Kelvin Helmholz instability is clearly visible. The second dynamic mode shows a characteristic
pattern located near the shear layer, which represents the roll-up of the symmetric vortex sheet in Figure 3.
The first and third mode depict small scale structures near the nozzle exit region.
From the Figure 4, it is observed that there is the formation of the Kelvin Helmoltz instability in both the
jets. From Figure 5, the time coefficients of POD modes 3,4 show a phase difference of 5 time steps. In
the other words, the POD modes 3,4 are strongly correlated to each other, This phenomena would further
give rise to study helical and columnar features of instabilities.
POD and DMD methods can be utilised for analysing the LES data. The power of PODs fast convergence
allows for the large scale structures to be isolated from the small scale structures in the turbulence. This
Fig. 3.
Comparison of first 5 DMD modes (top) and POD modes (bottom) for case 1 passive scalar field.
Fig. 4.
Comparison of first 5 DMD modes (top) and POD modes (bottom) for case 2 passive scalar field.
Fig. 5.
Time coefficients of case 1(left) and case 2( right) passive scalar fields
would help in analysing the flow field in different ways. From the Figure 3 and Figure 4, POD and DMD
methods are shown as a powerful numerical tools, for use in jet flows. The ability to maximize the intensity
fluctuations of the flow with a miminal number of modes shows PODs strength in the analysis of the
coherent flow structures and reduced order modelling. The DMD method has clear advantages over POD,
as it strives for a representation of the dominant flow features with in a temporal orthogonal framework,
while POD is based on a spatial orthogonal framework.
From the Figure 6 the eigenvalues of S represent the mapping between subsequent snapshots: unstable
eigenvalues are given by a modulus greater than one (i.e. |λ| > 1, are located outside the unit disk); stable
Fig. 6.
Eigenvalues of DMD for case 1 passive scalar field.
eigenvalues have a modulus equal to one (i.e. |λ| = 1, can be found on the unit disk); unstable eigenvalues
have a modulus less than one (i.e. |λ| < 1, can be found inside the unit disk);. For applications in fluid
dynamics, it is common to transform the eigenvalues of S using a logarithmic mapping, after which the
unstable (stable) eigenvalues have a positive (negative) real part. The procedural steps for computing the
dynamic mode decomposition are given in section 3.
V.
C ONCLUSIONS
POD and DMD methods can be utilised for analysing the LES data. The power of PODs fast convergence
allows for the large scale structures to be isolated from the small scale structures in the turbulence. The
DMD method has clear advantages over POD, as it strives for a representation of the dominant flow features
with in a temporal orthogonal framework, while POD is based on a spatial orthogonal framework. This paper
summerizes that POD and DMD methods will provide the experimentalist with solid tools, in quantifying
important mechanisms in time resolved measurements of fluid dynamics. It is hoped that DMD and POD
methods help in further understanding of fundamental fluid processes. In the future, effect of the time
window between two frames of time resolved data on DMD method would be studied. Furthermore, the
sensitivity analysis of the POD modes would be studied to show that the POD modes are independent of
the number of snapshots.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I thank Ville Vuorinen, D.Sc.(Tech.) for motivating me and helping me with solid ideas on how to proceed
with this course work on ’Direct Numerical Simulations’ 2012 at Aalto University, Finland. It would have
been very difficult for me to understand the basics of the course work with out Ville’s guidence.
R EFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
J. Miles, “On the generation of surface waves by shear flows part 3. kelvin-helmholtz instability,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 6,
no. 04, pp. 583–598, 1959.
C. Bishop and SpringerLink, Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer New York, 2006, vol. 4.
M.-S. Paukkeri, I. Kivimäki, S. Tirunagari, E. Oja, and T. Honkela, “Effect of dimensionality reduction on different distance measures
in document clustering,” in Neural Information Processing. Springer, 2011, pp. 167–176.
R. Perrin, M. Braza, E. Cid, S. Cazin, A. Barthet, A. Sevrain, C. Mockett, and F. Thiele, “Obtaining phase averaged turbulence
properties in the near wake of a circular cylinder at high reynolds number using pod,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 43, pp. 341–355,
2007, 10.1007/s00348-007-0347-6. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00348-007-0347-6
V. Vuorinen, J. Yu, S. Tirunagari, O. Kaario, M. Larmi, C. Duwig, and B. Boersma, “Large-eddy simulation of highly underexpanded
transient gas jets,” Physics of Fluids (1994-present), vol. 25, no. 1, p. 016101, 2013.
S. Tirunagari, V. Vuorinen, O. Kaario, and M. Larmi, “Analysis of proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition
on les of subsonic jets,” CSI Journal of Computing, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 20–26, 2012.
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
P. Schmid, K. Meyer, and O. Pust, “Dynamic mode decomposition and proper orthogonal decomposition of flow in a lid-driven cylindrical
cavity,” in Proc. of the 8th Intl. Symp. on Particle Image Velocimetry, 2009.
P. Schmid, “Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 656, no. 1, pp. 5–28,
2010.
R. Gorder, “Use of proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows.” 2010.
K. Meyer, D. Cavar, and J. Pedersen, “Pod as tool for comparison of piv and les data,” in 7th International Symposium on Particle
Image Velocimetry, 2007.
P. Schmid, L. Li, M. Juniper, and O. Pust, “Applications of the dynamic mode decomposition,” Theoretical and Computational Fluid
Dynamics, vol. 25, no. 1-4, pp. 249–259, 2011.
G. Berkooz, P. Holmes, and J. Lumley, “The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows,” Annual review of fluid
mechanics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 539–575, 1993.
L. Sirovich, “Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. part i: Coherent structures,” Quarterly of applied mathematics, vol. 45,
no. 3, pp. 561–571, 1987.
C. Duwig and P. Iudiciani, “Extended proper orthogonal decomposition for analysis of unsteady flames,” Flow, turbulence and combustion,
vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 25–47, 2010.
K. Meyer, J. Pedersen, and O. Ozcan, “A turbulent jet in crossflow analysed with proper orthogonal decomposition,” Journal of Fluid
Mechanics, vol. 583, pp. 199–228, 2007.
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1412.4646v3 [cs.DM] 23 Dec 2015
On the density of Lyndon roots in factors
Maxime Crochemore∗
Robert Mercaş†
February 15, 2018
1
Introduction
The concept of a run coined by Iliopoulos et al. [11] when analysing repetitions
in Fibonacci words, has been introduced to represent in a succinct manner all
occurrences of repetitions in a word. It is known that there are only O(n)
many of them in a word of length n from Kolpakov and Kucherov [12] who
proved it in a non-constructive manner. The first explicit bound was later on
provided by Rytter [15]. Several improvements on the upper bound can be found
in [16, 4, 14, 5, 8]. Kolpakov and Kucherov conjectured that this number is in
fact smaller than n, which has been proved by Bannai et al. [1, 2]. Recently,
Holub [10] and Fischer et al. [9] gave a tighter upper bound reaching 22n/23.
In this note we provide a proof of the result, slightly different than the short
and elegant proof in [2]. Then we provide a relation between the border-free
root conjugates of a square and the critical positions [13, Chapter 8] occurring
in it. Finally, counting runs extends naturally to the question of their highest
density, that is, to the question of the type of factors in which there is a large
accumulation of runs. This is treated in the last section.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
a
b
a
a
b
a
b
b
a
b
a
b
b
Figure 1: Dotted lines show the 8 runs in abaababbababb. For example, [7 . . 11]
is the run of period 2 and length 5 associated with factor babab.
Formally, a run in a word w is an interval [i . . j] of positions, 0 ≤ i < j < |w|,
for which both the associated factor w[i . . j] is periodic (i.e. its smallest period
p satisfies p ≤ (j − i + 1)/2), and the periodicity cannot be extended to the
right nor to the left: w[i − 1 . . j] and w[i . . j + 1] have larger periods when these
words are defined (see Figure 1).
∗ King’s
† Kiel
College London and Université Paris-Est. [email protected]
University and King’s College London. [email protected]
1
2
Fewer runs than length
We consider an ordering < on the word alphabet and the corresponding lexicographic ordering denoted < as well. We also consider the lexicographic ordering
e called the reverse ordering, inferred by the inverse alphabet ordering <−1 .
<,
The main element in the proof of the theorem is to assign to each run its greatest
suffix according to one of the two orderings.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
a
b
a
a
b
a
b
b
a
b
a
b
b
Figure 2: Plain lines show the 8 greatest proper suffixes assigned to runs of
abaababbababb from Figure 1 in the proof of the theorem. Note that no two
suffixes start at the same position.
Theorem 1 The number of runs in a word of length n is less than n.
Proof. Let w be a word of length n. Let [i . . j] (0 ≤ i < j < n) be a run of
smallest period p in w. If j + 1 < n and w[j + 1] > w[j − p + 1] we assign to
the run the position k for which w[k . . j] is the greatest proper suffix of w[i . . j].
e
Else, k is the position of the greatest proper suffix of w[i . . j] according to <.
Note that if k > i then k > 0, and that w[k . . j] contains a full period of
the run factor, i.e. j − k + 1 ≥ p. Also note that w[k . . k + p − 1] is a greatest
conjugate of the period root w[i . . i+p−1] according to one of the two orderings.
Therefore, it is border-free, known property of Lyndon words.
We claim that each position k > 0 on w is the starting position of at most
one greatest proper suffix of a run factor. Let us consider two distinct runs [i . . j]
and [ī . . j̄] of respective periods p and q, and which are called respectively the
p-run and the q-run. Assume p 6= q since the runs cannot be distinct and have
the same period. For the sake of contradiction, we assume that their greatest
suffixes share the same starting position k.
First case, j = j̄, which implies w[k . . j] = w[k . . j̄]. Assume for example
that p < q. Then, w[k . . k + q − 1] has period p and thus is not border-free,
which is a contradiction.
Second case, assume without loss of generality that j < j̄ and that both
suffixes are the greatest in their runs according to the same ordering, say <. Let
d = w[j +1], the letter following the p-run. By definition we have w[j −p+1] < d
and then w[i . . j − p + 1] < w[i . . j − p]d. But since w[i + p . . j]d is a factor of
the q-run this contradicts the maximality of w[k . . j̄ − 1].
Third case, j 6= j̄ and the suffixes are greatest according to different orderings. Assume without loss of generality that p < q and the suffix of the p-run
e
factor is greatest according to <. Since q > 1 we have both w[k + q − 1]>w[k]
and w[k + q − 1] = w[k − 1], then w[k − 1] < w[k]. We cannot have p > 1
because this implies w[k − 1] > w[k]. And we cannot have either p = 1 because
this implies w[k − 1] = w[k]. Therefore we get again a contradiction.
2
This ends the proof of the claim and shows that the number of runs is no
more than the number n − 1 of potential values for k, as stated.
3
Lyndon roots
The proof of Theorem 1 by Bannai et al. [2] relies on the notion of a Lyndon root.
Recall that, for a fixed ordering on the alphabet, a Lyndon word is a primitive
word that is not larger than any of its conjugates (rotations). Equivalently, it is
smaller than all its proper suffixes. The root of a run [i . . j] of period p in w is
the factor w[i . . i + p − 1]. Henceforth, the Lyndon root of a run is the Lyndon
conjugate of its root. Therefore, since a run has length at least twice as long
as its root, the first occurrence of its Lyndon root is followed by its first letter.
This notion of Lyndon root is the basis of the proof of the 0.5n upper bound
on the number of cubic runs given in [6]. Recall that a run is said to be cubic
if its length is at least three times larger than its period.
Lyndon roots considered in [2] are defined according to the two orderings
e However, these Lyndon roots can be defined as smallest or greatest
< and <.
conjugates of the run root according to only one ordering.
The proof of Theorem 1 is inspired by the proof in [2] but does not use
explicitly the notion of Lyndon roots. The link between the two proofs is as
follows: when the suffix w[k . . j] is greatest according to < in the run factor,
then its prefix of period length, w[k . . k + p − 1], is a Lyndon word according
e As a consequence, the assignment of positions to runs is almost the same
to <.
whatever greatest suffixes or Lyndon roots are considered.
The use of Lyndon roots leaves more flexibility to assign positions to runs.
Indeed, a run factor may contain several occurrences of the run Lyndon root.
Furthermore, any two consecutive occurrences of this root do not overlap and
are adjacent. The multiplicity of these occurrences can be transposed to greatest
suffixes by considering their borders. Doing so, what is essential in the proof
of Theorem 1 is that the suffixes and borders so defined are at least as long as
the period of the run. Consequently, consecutive such marked positions can be
assigned to the same run. As a consequence, since every cubic run is associated
to at least two positions, this yields the following corollaries.
Corollary 2 If a word of length n contains c cubic runs, it contains less than
n − c runs.
Corollary 3 A word of length n contains less than 0.5n cubic runs.
The last statement is proved in [6] employing the notion of Critical position,
which is discussed in the next section.
4
Critical positions
The consideration of the two above orderings appears in the simple proof of the
Critical Factorisation Theorem [7] (for another proof see [13, Chapter 8]).
3
Let us recall that the local period at position |u| in uv is the length of the
shortest non-empty word z for which z 2 is a repetition centred at position |u|.
Equivalently, in simpler words, z is the shortest non-empty word that satisfies
both conditions: either z is a suffix of u or u is a suffix of z, and either z is
a prefix of v or v is a prefix of z. Note that vu satisfies the conditions but is
not necessarily the shortest word to do it. The Critical Factorisation Theorem
states that a word x of period p admits a factorisation x = uv whose local period
at position |u| is p. Such a factorisation uv of x is called a critical factorisation
and the position |u| on x a critical position.
When considering the starting positions of greatest suffixes defined above
e the shorter of the two is known to provide a critical
according to < and to <,
position following [7]. Thus, it does not come as a surprise to us that the simple
proof of Theorem 1 relies on alphabet orderings. Nevertheless, as the initial
question does not involve any ordering on the alphabet, we could expect a proof
using, for example, only the notion of critical positions. The next lemma may
be a step on this way.
v
u
y
v
y
p
v
u
q
u
z
z
Figure 3: If uv is a border-free factor of (vu)2 , then at least one of its local period
words y or z have length |uv|. Otherwise, the common part in the dash-box has
length equal to the sum of its periods p and q generating a contradiction.
Lemma 4 Let x2 = (vu)2 be a square whose root conjugate uv is border-free.
Then, at least |v| or |vuv| are critical positions on x2 .
Proof. Let y be the local period word at position |v| on x2 . Since uv is borderfree, v is a proper suffix of y. Similarly, for the local period word z at position
|vuv|, the border-freeness of uv implies that u is a proper prefix of z. The
situation is displayed in Figure 3.
For the sake of contradiction we assume the conclusion does not hold, i.e.,
both y and z are shorter than uv (note that they cannot be longer than uv).
Let |p| be the induced period of pu and |q| the induced period of vq. The
overlap between the two words p and q admits period lengths |p| and |q| and
has length |pu| − (|uv| − |vq|) = |p| + |q|. Thus, by the Periodicity Lemma, p
and q are powers of the same word r. But then r is a nonempty prefix of u and
a suffix of v contradicting the border-freeness of uv.
Example. Consider the square baba of period 2. The occurrence of its borderfree factor ab induces the two critical positions 1 and 3. On the contrary, the
first occurrence of its border-free factor ba induces only one critical position,
namely 2, while the local period at 0 has length 1 < 2.
4
In the square abaaba of period 3, the occurrence of the border-free factor
aab produces the critical position 2. However, its position 5 is not critical since
the local period 2 is smaller than the whole period of the square.
5
Lyndon roots density
In this section we consider a generalisation of the problem of counting the maximal number of runs in a word. In particular, we are interested in the following
problem concerning first occurrences of Lyndon roots within a run factor. Let us
call the interval corresponding to the first such occurrence the Lroot associated
with the run. Then, we are dealing with the following conjecture:
Conjecture 1 ([3]) For any two positions i and j on a word x, 0 ≤ i ≤ j < |x|,
the maximal number of run Lroots included in the interval [i . . j] is not more
than the interval length j − i + 1.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
a
b
a
b
a
a
b
a
b
b
a
b
a
b
b
Figure 4: Lines show the 6 run Lroots inside the interval [4 . . 9] corresponding
to the factor aababb.
Let us consider the word x = (ab)k a(ab)k b(ab)k b and the interval of positions [2k . . 4k + 1] corresponding to the factor a(ab)k b. The number of Lroots
corresponding to this interval is exactly the length 2(k + 1) of the interval. Figure 4 shows the situation when k = 2. This example gives a lower bound on the
maximal number of Lroots contained in an interval of positions.
Proposition 5 The number of Lroots contained in an interval of positions on
a word, can be as large as the length of the interval.
In addition to the conjecture, we believe that factors associated with intervals
of length at least 4 containing the maximal number of Lroots are of the form
a(ab)+ b for two different letters a and b. It can be checked that the maximal
number of Lroots is respectively 1 and 3 for intervals of lengths 1 and 3 with
factors a and aab, but is only 1 for intervals of length 2. All these factors are
Lyndon words for the ordering a < b. This is due to the fact that such factors
contain overlapping Lyndon roots making the whole factor a Lyndon word itself.
Remark 6 In order to obtain an upper bound on the number of Lroots inside an
interval of positions, it is enough to restrict ourselves to counting the maximal
number of Lroots within an interval corresponding to some Lyndon word.
Indeed, each Lroot corresponds to a Lyndon word. Since we want an interval
that contains the maximal such number, all the positions of this interval are
covered by some Lyndon word. However, since the overlap between every two
5
Lyndon words produces a Lyndon word, and since every word can be expressed
as a concatenation of Lyndon words, our claim follows.
We show that the number of Lroots inside an interval corresponding to a
Lyndon word is bounded by 1.5 times the length of the interval. For this we
make use of the result from [2] stating that each position of a word is the starting
position of at most one specific root associated with the run. The root is chosen
according to some order defined by the letter following the run. We denote such
a root relative to the order as the Oroot of the run. Formally:
Definition 1 Let r be a run of period pr of the word w and let rL be the Lroot
associated with r. If r ends at the last position of w, or if the letter at the
position following r is smaller than the letter pr positions before it, then the
Oroot is the interval corresponding to the first occurrence of a Lyndon root that
is not a prefix of r. Otherwise, the Oroot is the interval corresponding to the
length pr prefix of the greatest proper suffix of the run factor r.
Observe that since a run is at least as long as twice its minimal period, this
ensures the existence of both its Lroot as well as its Oroot. To see that the Oroot
is never a prefix of the run factor it is associated with, observe from its above
definition that in the second case this is actually the interval corresponding to
the length pr prefix of the maximal proper suffix of the run, which is different
from the run itself (being proper).
Henceforth we fix an interval [i . . j] with its corresponding Lyndon word w
of length ℓ. Furthermore, we denote by rL = [iL . . jL ] the Lroot of the run
r = [ir . . jr ] and by rO = [iO . . jO ] its Oroot. For r, we denote by pr the
(smallest) period of the run. Please note that |rL | = |rO | = pr , while both must
start and end within the run r.
We make the following remarks based on the already known properties of
Lroots and Oroots.
Remark 7 The Lroot and the Oroot associated with a run r start within the
first pr and pr + 1, respectively, positions of the run, and both have length pr .
As a direct consequence of the definition of the Oroot we have the following:
Remark 8 If the Oroot of a run r is a Lyndon word, then the Oroot and the
corresponding Lroot represent the same factor and, either iO = iL , or the run
r starts at position iL and iL + pr = iO .
In conclusion we have the following:
Remark 9 To bound the number of Lroots inside the interval [i . . j] corresponding to the word w, it is enough to consider all runs starting within the interval
corresponding to a factor wp w, where |wp | < |w|.
For the rest of this work let us fix the factor preceding a Lyndon word w
as wp , while the one following it by ws , such that the interval corresponding to
wp wws is the shortest interval that contains all runs with their Lroots in [i . . j].
6
Now we start looking at the relative positions of the Oroot and Lroot corresponding to the same run.
i+ℓ
iO i
iL
wp
ws
w
rO
rL
Figure 5: rO starts before the Lyndon word w
Lemma 10 Fix an Lroot occurring within an interval w = [i . . i + ℓ − 1] of a
word. If the Oroot corresponding to the same run starts outside w, then either:
1. the Lroot ends at position i+ℓ−1, and the Oroot starts at position i+ℓ, or
2. the Lroot starts at position i, and the Oroot starts before position i.
Proof. Following Remark 6, without loss of generality assume that wp starts
at position 0 and has length i, while w = [i . . i + ℓ − 1] is a Lyndon word. As
stated in the hypothesis, i ≤ iL and |rL | ≤ ℓ.
First let us assume that iO ≥ i + ℓ, hence the Oroot starts after the end of
the Lyndon word w. The result follows immediately from Remark 8.
For the second statement, consider Figure 5 where iO < i ≤ iL . Assume
towards a contradiction that i < iL . Since iO < i and rL corresponds to an
interval on w, it must be that the corresponding run starts before or on position
iO and it ends after or on position i + ℓ − 1. However, since w is a Lyndon
word, it must be that for any word x such that yx is a suffix of w, where y is
the factor corresponding to rL , we have w < yx. But in this case, unless y is a
prefix of w, we get a contradiction with the fact that rL is a Lyndon root. In
the former case, however, we get a contradiction with the definition of rL since
i < iL (rL is the interval corresponding to the first occurrence of a Lyndon root
of the run), and the conclusion follows in this case as well.
As a consequence of the above lemma, the number of Lroots is bounded by 2ℓ.
This is because the Oroots all start inside an interval of length |wp |+|w|+1 ≤ 2ℓ,
and no two share the same starting position [2]. In the following we reduce this
bound to 1.5ℓ. The next lemma shows that the situation in Lemma 10.1 is met
by at most one Oroot.
Lemma 11 For any word and any interval [i . . j] on it, there exists at most
one run that has its Oroot starting after position j while its Lroot corresponds
to an interval inside [i . . j].
Proof. According to Lemma 10.1, it must be the case that iO = j + 1, while
iL = j − pr + 1, for any appropriate run r. However, having more than one
Oroot starting at position j + 1 with the factor corresponding to its Lroot as
a suffix of the Lyndon word, would then imply that the larger of Lroots that
corresponds to a Lyndon word is bordered, which is a contradiction.
Now we are dealing with Oroots corresponding to Lemma 10.2.
7
Proposition 12 For a given word, any interval of length ℓ of positions on the
word contains at most 3ℓ/2 Lroots.
Proof. Let us denote once more our interval by w = [i . . i + ℓ − 1] and the
interval preceding it by wp . We know from the definition that an Lroot is the
first Lyndon root of a run, and therefore the letter ending every Lroot must be
greater than its first letter, while the one on the position right after the end of
the Lroot must be the same as the first letter of the Lroot.
Since for any Oroot starting in the interval associated with wp , the Lroot
corresponding to it in w starts at position i, we note that these can be bounded
by the number of length two factors in w that have the letter on the first position
larger than the letter on position i, while the second one identical. If the second
letter of such a factor is smaller than the letter on position i, than this situation
would make it impossible for a Lroot to start on position i and end before this
position (this is because an Lroot is the first Lyndon root occurrence of a run).
Since this number is obviously bounded by 2ℓ , while the whole length of
wp is bounded by ℓ − 1, (by considering the symmetric situation) we conclude
that there are less than ℓ−1
2 runs that start in wp such that their corresponding
Oroots start before position i, while their Lroots start at position i (the Lroots
correspond to prefixes of w). Hence, combining this with the fact that within w
we have at most ℓ Oroots starting there, see [2], and since according to Lemma 11
there is at most one Oroot starting after position j that has the Lroot in w, we
get an upper bound for our problem.
The bound given in the above proposition is not really tight. On this point
let us complete the conjecture:
Conjecture 2 For a given word, any interval of length ℓ > 0 of positions on
the word contains at most ℓ Lroots, and the maximum number is obtained only
ℓ−2
when the factor corresponding to the interval is of the form a(ab) 2 b, where
ℓ > 3, and the letters a and b satisfy a < b.
We end this article with a few more observations regarding the results
from [2], when we restrict ourselves to binary words. First we recall a property of Oroots:
Lemma 13 (Bannai et al. [2]) If two different Oroots obtained considering
the same order overlap, then their overlap is the shortest of the Oroots.
We observe that we can consider Oroots to be obtained according to a certain order based on the letter that these Oroots start with (thus all Oroots
starting with a are obtained according to the lexicographical order, while the
ones starting with b are obtained according to the inverse lexicographical one).
Proposition 14 For a given binary word, any interval of length ℓ of positions
on the word contains at most ℓ−1
2 Oroots obtained according to the same order.
8
Proof. Without loss of generality we fix an order; let us say lexicographical.
Observe first, that for a word to correspond to an Oroot, whenever they are
not binary, they must start with a letter a and end with a b (as previously
mentioned). Furthermore, it must be the case that this interval is preceded by
a b and followed by an a, as otherwise it does not correspond to a Lyndon root
(there exists another rotation that has an extra a in its longest unary prefix).
Finally, observe that considering their relative position, following Lemma 13,
two such Oroots are either included one in the other, or they are disjoint.
Now, considering two words corresponding to two Oroots, let us say u and v
with u a factor of v, we note that, since their lengths are different, following the
initial conditions, they must differ by a length of at least 2, whenever u is not
unary (each starts between a b and an a, and ends between an a and a b). For
the unary case, note that every block of consecutive a’s must be in-between two
occurrences of b. Furthermore, we cannot have two unary words corresponding
to Oroots overlapping each other. Thus if the position of the second a is an
Oroot in the word baℓ b, for ℓ > 0, it is impossible to have a length less than 3
for any word starting with the first a whose interval corresponds to an Oroot.
Given that for any two distinct adjoining Oroots both their lengths and the
number of Oroots they contain add up, the result follows in this case as well.
In order to get the −1, we observe that for any word of length at least 3,
for the interval it determines to have the maximum number of Oroots of the
same order, according to the previous facts, would imply the word to have the
form (ab)+ . However, now, the Oroots would correspond to words that are just
powers of one another, contradicting their property of being Lyndon words.
Furthermore, denoting by |w|u the number of all (possibly overlapping) occurrences of u in w, as consequence of the above we have the following:
Corollary 15 Every length ℓ interval associated with a factor w of a binary
word completely contains at most min{|w|ab , |w|ba } Oroots that correspond to
non-unary factors and are obtained according to the same order.
Corollary 16 The number of Oroots associated with unary runs within every
factor of a binary word is at most one extra than the number of unary maximal
blocks within the factor (by a maximal block we refer to a unary factor that
cannot be extended either to the left or to the right without losing its periodicity).
6
Acknowledgement
We would like to warmly thank Gregory Kucherov, Hideo Bannai, and Bill
Smyth for helpful discussions on the subject. The work of Robert Mercaş was
supported by the P.R.I.M.E. programme of DAAD with funds provided by the
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the European Union’s
Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and
demonstration (grant agreement no. 605728).
9
References
[1] H. Bannai, T. I, S. Inenaga, Y. Nakashima, M. Takeda, and K. Tsuruta.
A new characterization of maximal repetitions by Lyndon trees. In 26th
Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA, pages 562–
571, 2015.
[2] H. Bannai, T. I, S. Inenaga, Y. Nakashima, M. Takeda, and K. Tsuruta.
The “runs” theorem. CoRR, abs/1406.0263v7, 2015.
[3] M. Crochemore. Repeats in strings. Keynote talk at the 25th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching, Moscow, June 2014. Personal
communication.
[4] M. Crochemore and L. Ilie. Maximal repetitions in strings. Journal of
Computer and System Sciences, 74(5):796 – 807, 2008.
[5] M. Crochemore, L. Ilie, and L. Tinta. The “runs” conjecture. Theoretical
Computer Science, 412(27):2931–2941, 2011.
[6] M. Crochemore, C. S. Iliopoulos, M. Kubica, J. Radoszewski, W. Rytter,
and T. Waleń. The maximal number of cubic runs in a word. Journal of
Computer and System Sciences, 78(6):1828–1836, 2012.
[7] M. Crochemore and D. Perrin. Two-way string-matching. Journal of the
ACM, 38(3):651–675, 1991.
[8] A. Deza and F. Franek. A d-step approach to the maximum number
of distinct squares and runs in strings. Discrete Applied Mathematics,
163(3):268–274, 2014.
[9] J. Fischer, Š. Holub, T. I, and M. Lewenstein. Beyond the runs theorem.
In Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on String Processing
and Information Retrieval, SPIRE, volume 9309 of LNCS, pages 272–281,
2015.
[10] Š. Holub. Beyond the runs theorem. CoRR, abs/1502.04644v1, 2015.
[11] C. S. Iliopoulos, D. Moore, and W. F. Smyth. A characterization of the
squares in a Fibonacci string. Theoretical Computer Science, 172(1–2):281–
291, 1997.
[12] R. Kolpakov and G. Kucherov. Finding maximal repetitions in a word in
linear time. In 40th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer
Science, FOCS, pages 596–604, New York, 1999.
[13] M. Lothaire. Combinatorics on Words. Cambridge University Press, second
edition, 1997.
[14] S. J. Puglisi, J. Simpson, and W. F. Smyth. How many runs can a string
contain? Theoretical Computer Science, 401(1-3):165–171, 2008.
10
[15] W. Rytter. The number of runs in a string: Improved analysis of the
linear upper bound. In 23rd Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of
Computer Science, STACS, volume 3884 of LNCS, pages 184–195, 2006.
[16] W. Rytter. The number of runs in a string. Information and Computation,
205(9):1459–1469, 2007.
11
| 8cs.DS
|
arXiv:1304.4257v3 [math.AC] 8 Oct 2015
Markov bases and generalized Lawrence
liftings
Hara Charalambous, Apostolos Thoma and Marius Vladoiu
Abstract. Minimal Markov bases of configurations of integer vectors correspond to minimal binomial generating sets of the assocciated lattice
ideal. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the elements of a
minimal Markov basis to be (a) inside the universal Gröbner basis and
(b) inside the Graver basis. We study properties of Markov bases of
generalized Lawrence liftings for arbitrary matrices A ∈ Mm×n (Z) and
B ∈ Mp×n (Z) and show that in cases of interest the complexity of any
two Markov bases is the same.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). Primary 14M25; Secondary
14L32,13P10,62H17.
Keywords. Toric ideals, Markov basis, Graver basis, Lawrence liftings.
1. Introduction
Let A be an element of Mm×n (Z), for some positive integers m, n. The
object of interest is the lattice L(A) := KerZ (A). A Markov basis M of A is
a finite subset of L(A) such that whenever w, u ∈ Nn and w − u ∈ L(A) (i.e.
Aw = Au), there exists a subset {vi : iP
= 1, . . . , s} of M that connects
w to
Ps
p
u. This means that for 1 ≤ p ≤ s, w + i=1 vi ∈ Nn and w + i=1 vi = u.
A Markov basis M of A gives rise to a generating set of the lattice ideal
IL(A) := hxu − xv : Au = Avi .
Each u ∈ Zn can be uniquely written as u = u+ −u− where u+ , u− ∈ Nn are
vectors with non-overlapping support. In the seminal work of Diaconis and
Sturmfels in [4], it was shown that M is a Markov basis of A if and only if
+
−
the set {xu − xu : u ∈ M } is a generating set of IL(A) . A Markov basis M
of A is minimal if no subset of M is a Markov basis of A. We say that L(A)
is positive if L(A) ∩ Nn = {0} and non positive if L(A) ∩ Nn 6= {0}. When
L(A) is positive then the graded Nakayama Lemma applies and all minimal
.
2
Charalambous, Thoma and Vladoiu
Markov bases have the same cardinality. When L(A) is non positive, it is
possible to have minimal Markov bases of A of different cardinalities, see [3].
It is important to note that the study of non positive lattices has important
implications in the study of positive ones, see for example the proof of [10,
Theorem 3], [7, Lemma 5] and [8, Theorem 3.5]. The universal Markov basis of
A will be denoted by M(A) and is defined as the union of all minimal Markov
bases of A of minimal cardinality, where we identify a vector u with −u,
see [3, 10]. The sublattice of L(A) generated by all elements of L(A) ∩ Nn is
called the pure sublattice of L(A) and is important when considering minimal
Markov bases of A, see [3]. The pure sublattice of L(A) is zero exactly when
L(A) is positive.
Let u, v, w be non zero vectors in Zn . If u = v+w we write u = v+c w to
denote that this sum gives a conformal decomposition of u i.e. u+ = v+ + w+
and u− = v− +w− . The set consisting of all non zero elements of L(A) which
have no conformal decomposition is denoted by G(A) and is called the Graver
+
−
basis of A. When u ∈ G(A) the binomial xu − xu is called primitive. G(A)
is always a finite set, see [6, 11]. In this paper we examine in detail when an
element of a minimal Markov basis belongs to G(A). We show in Theorem 2.3
that M(A) ⊂ G(A) holds in just two cases: when L(A) is positive and when
L(A) is pure of rank 1. We point out that even though the inclusion for
positive lattices is well known, we could not locate its proof in the literature,
so we provide it here for completeness of the exposition.
By U(A) we denote the universal Gröbner basis of A, i.e. the set which
+
−
consists of all vectors u ∈ L(A) such that xu − xu is part of a reduced
n
Gröbner basis of IL(A) for some term order on N . The inclusion U(A) ⊂ G(A)
always hold (see [11, Lemma 4.6]). In this paper we examine the relation
between M(A) and U(A). In general M(A) is not a subset of U(A) even
when L(A) is positive as Example 2.8 shows. In Theorem 2.7 we give a
necessary and sufficient condition for M(A) to be contained in U(A) when
L(A) is positive.
In Section 3, for r ≥ 2, B ∈ Mp×n (Z), we study the generalized
Lawrence lifting Λ(A, B, r):
r−times
A
0
Λ(A, B, r) =
0
B
z
0
A
}|
{
..
0
B
.
···
0
0
.
A
B
When B = In one gets the usual r–th Lawrence lifting A(r) , see [10]. Such
liftings were used to prove for example the finiteness of the Graver basis
of A and are connected to hierarchical models in Algebraic Statistics, see
[10, 8]. We denote the columns of A by a1 , . . . , an and the columns of B by
Markov bases and generalized Lawrence liftings
3
b1 , . . . , bn . The (rm + p) × rn matrix Λ(A, B, r) has columns the vectors
{ai ⊗ ej ⊕ bi : 1 ≤ i ≤ n, 1 ≤ j ≤ r},
where e1 , . . . , en represents the canonical basis of Zn . Note that L(Λ(A, B, r))
is a sublattice of Zrn . Let C ∈ L(Λ(A, B, r)). We can assign to C an r × n
matrix C such that Ci,j = C(i−1)n+j . Each row of C corresponds to an element
of L(A) and the sum of the rows of C corresponds to an element in L(B). The
number of nonzero rows of C is the type of C. The complexity of any subset
of Λ(A, B, r) is the largest type of any vector in that set.
For r ≥ 2 we consider the Graver basis of Λ(A, B, r), G(Λ(A, B, r)). We
let the Graver complexity of (A, B) be the supremum over r of the complexities of G(Λ(A, B, r)) and denote it by g(A, B). By [8, Theorem 3.5], g(A, B)
is finite and equals the maximum 1-norm of the elements in the Graver basis of the matrix B · Gr(A), where Gr(A) is the matrix whose columns are
the elements of G(A). In the literature there are two definitions of Markov
complexity of (A, B). The first introduced in [10] defines the Markov complexity of (A, B) as the smallest integer m such that there exists a Markov
basis of Λ(A, B, r) of type less than or equal to m for any r ≥ 2. It is always finite and bounded by g(A, B). The second definition given in [8] defines
the Markov complexity of (A, B) as the largest type of any element in the
universal Markov basis of Λ(A, B, r) as r varies. The main result of Section
3 is Theorem 3.3. It states that when L(Λ(A, B, r)) is positive, all minimal
Markov bases of Λ(A, B, r) have the same complexity. This is computationally essential, since to compute the complexity of any minimal Markov basis
of Λ(A, B, r) one can start with any monomial order in Nn , compute the
reduced Gröbner basis of Λ(A, B, r), eliminate extraneous elements to obtain a minimal Markov basisof Λ(A, B, r) and then read the largest type of
the remaining elements. We note that in general L(Λ(A, B, r)) is positive for
some r ≥ 2 if and only if L(Λ(A, B, r)) is positive for all r ≥ 2 and to decide
whether this holds it suffices to check whether the lattice KerZ (A) ∩ KerZ (B)
is positive (see Lemma 3.2). When KerZ (A) ∩ KerZ (B) is non positive then
Theorem 3.5 shows that the Markov complexities of Λ(A, B, r) cannot be
bounded as r varies. In Example 3.7 we give matrices A, B such that for all
r ≥ 2, L(Λ(A, B, r)) has a minimal Markov basis of complexity k for every
2 ≤ k ≤ r. Finally, in Remark 3.8 we discuss implications of our work to the
two notions of Markov complexity.
2. Universal Markov and Gröbner bases
For simplicity of notation we write L for L(A), M for M(A), G for G(A), U
for U(A) and Lpure for the pure sublattice of L generated by the elements in
L ∩ Nn .
Theorem 2.1. [3, Theorem 4.18] If i) rank(Lpure ) > 1 or ii) rank(Lpure ) = 1
and L 6= Lpure then M is infinite.
4
Charalambous, Thoma and Vladoiu
Next we consider the fibers Fu of IL for any u ∈ L. We let Fu := {t ∈
Nn : u+ − t ∈ L}. We note that if L is positive then Fu is a finite set. We
construct a graph Gu with vertices the elements of Fu . Two vertices w1 ,
w2 are joined by an edge if there is an index i such that i-th component of
w1 and w2 are nonzero. Thus w1 , w2 are joined by an edge if and only if
(w1 − w2 )+ is componentwise smaller than w1 , meaning that at least one
component of their difference is strictly positive. The following necessary
condition for u ∈ L to be in M was observed in [2, Theorem 2.7] and [5,
Theorem 1.3.2] when L is positive.
Theorem 2.2. If L is positive then u is in the universal Markov basis of A if
and only if u+ and u− belong to different connected components of Gu .
Fu is called a Markov fiber when there exists an element v in the universal Markov basis of A such that v+ ∈ Fu . The Markov polyhedra of Fu are
the convex hulls of the elements of the connected components of Gu . When
L is positive, the Markov polyhedra of Fu are actually polytopes. For u ∈ L
we let P [u] be the convex hull of all elements of Gu . When u ∈ M the vertices of P [u] are vertices of the Markov polyhedra of Fu and we will see that
the vertices of the Markov polyhedra are decisive in determining whether u
belongs to the universal Gröbner basis of A. The criterion of Theorem 2.2 is
used in the proof of the next theorem.
Theorem 2.3. The universal Markov basis of A is a subset of the Graver basis
of A if and only if one of the following two conditions hold: i) L is positive
or ii) L = Lpure and rank L = 1.
Proof. Assume first that M ⊂ G. Theorem 2.1 says that if rank(Lpure ) > 1
or rank(Lpure ) = 1 and L 6= Lpure then the universal Markov basis M of A
is infinite. Since the Graver basis of A is finite the desired conclusion follows.
For the converse, assume first that L is non positive. By Theorem 2.1 we are
in the case where rank(Lpure ) = 1 and L = Lpure . We let 0 6= w ∈ Nn be
such that L = hwi. It is immediate that w ∈ G and thus M = G. Next we
examine the case where L is positive. We will show that if u ∈ L, u ∈
/ G
then u ∈
/ M. Since u ∈
/ G there exist nonzero vectors v, w ∈ L such that
u = v +c w. Thus u+ = v+ + w+ and u− = v− + w− . It follows that
u+ , u− and u+ − v = w+ + v− are all in Fu . Next we show that v+ is
nonzero. Indeed suppose not. Since v− = v − v+ = v ∈ L ∩ Nn = {0},
it follows that v = 0, a contradiction. Similarly w+ , v− , w− are nonzero.
Thus in the fiber Fu , the elements u+ , w+ + v− are connected by an edge
because (u+ − (w+ + v− ))+ = v+ , which is smaller than u+ . Similarly u− ,
w+ + v− are connected by an edge because ((w+ + v− ) − u− )+ = w+ , which
is smaller than w+ +v− . It follows that u+ , u− belong to the same connected
component of Gu and thus u ∈
/ M.
Remark 2.4. Let E be the union of all minimal Markov bases of A, not
necessarily of minimal cardinality, where we identify a vector u with −u.
Note that M ⊂ E. Next we show that E is a subset of G if and only if L is
Markov bases and generalized Lawrence liftings
5
a positive lattice. Indeed when L is a positive lattice then E = M ⊂ G as
pointed out in the introduction (see also [3]). Suppose now that L is a non
positive lattice and consider the only case left unanswered by Theorem 2.3:
namely consider the case where L = Lpure of rank 1. This means that L = hwi
for some 0 6= w ∈ Nn . It is easy to see that if k, l ≥ 2 are any two relatively
prime integers then {kw, lw} is a minimal Markov basis of A. Thus kw ∈ E
for every k and therefore E is infinite and cannot be a subset of the Graver
basis of A, which is equal to {w}.
Next we examine the relation between the universal Markov basis of A
and the universal Gröbner basis of A. We recall the following characterization
given in [11].
Theorem 2.5. [11, Theorem 7.8] If L is positive and u ∈ L then u is in the
universal Gröbner basis of A if and only if the greatest common divisor of
the coordinates of u is one and the line segment [u+ , u− ] is an edge of the
polytope P [u].
For u ∈ Rn , we let supp(u) := {i : ui 6= 0}. For X ⊂ Rn , we let
[
supp(X) :=
supp(u) .
u∈X
We note that if u ∈ M and L is positive then it is not hard to prove that
the supports of different connected components of Gu are disjoint. Hence the
Markov polytopes of Fu are disjoint.
Lemma 2.6. Let L be positive. An element u of the universal Markov basis of
A belongs to the universal Gröbner basis of A if and only if u+ and u− are
vertices of two different Markov polytopes.
Proof. Suppose that u ∈ U. Since u ∈ M, it follows by Theorem 2.2 that u+
and u− are elements of two different Markov polytopes of Fu . Since [u+ , u− ]
is an edge of P [u] it follows that u+ , u− are vertices of P [u] and thus of their
Markov polytopes as well.
For the converse assume u+ , u− are vertices of the disjoint Markov
polytopes P1 , P2 respectively. Since u+ , u− are vertices of P1 , P2 we can find
vectors c1 , c2 such that supp(ci ) ⊂ supp(Pi ) for i = 1, 2 with the property
that c1 · u+ = 0, c1 · v > 0 for all v ∈ P1 \ {u+ } and c2 · u− = 0, c2 · v > 0
for all v ∈ P2 \ {u− }. We define c as follows
(c1 )i , if i ∈ supp(c1 ),
(c2 )i , if i ∈ supp(c2 ),
ci =
1,
otherwise.
From the definition of c it follows that c · v = 0 for all v ∈ [u+ , u− ] and
c · v > 0 for all v ∈ conv(P1 ∪ P2 ) \ {[u+ , u− ]}. On the other hand c · v > 0
for all v ∈
/ conv(P1 ∪ P2 ), since P [u] ⊂ Rn+ . Therefore [u+ , u− ] is an edge of
P [u] and by Theorem 2.5 we have u ∈ U, as desired.
6
Charalambous, Thoma and Vladoiu
Note that if L is non positive and rank Lpure > 1, then M is infinite
by Theorem 2.1 and thus M 6⊂ U. On the other hand if L = Lpure and
rank L = 1 then M = U = {w} where w is the generator of L. The proof of
the next theorem follows immediately by these remarks and Lemma 2.6.
Theorem 2.7. Let A be an arbitrary integer matrix. The universal Markov
basis of A is a subset of the universal Gröbner basis of A if and only if one
of the following two conditions holds
1. L is positive and every element of a Markov fiber is a vertex of a Markov
polytope,
2. L = Lpure and rank L = 1.
We finish this section with an example which shows specific elements of
M not in U.
Example 2.8. Let
A=
2
4
4
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
2
4
0
2
2
2
0
4
2
2
3
3
3
6
6
3
3
3
0
0
3
3
3
6
0
3
3
3
0
6
.
Then L is a positive lattice. One can prove that {u, v, w} is a minimal Markov
basis of A where u = (1, 1, −1, −1, 0, 0, 0, 0), v = (0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, −1, −1)
and w = (2, 2, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, −1). The corresponding Markov fibers are
Fu = {u+ , u− } , Fv = {v+ , v− } and Fw = {3u+ , w+ , u+ + 2u− , 3u− , 2v+ ,
w− , 2v− }. The Markov polytopes of Fu and Fv are zero dimensional, they
consist of points. The Markov polytopes of Fw are one dimensional: they
are the line segments conv(3u+ , 3u− ) and conv(2v+ , 2v− ). We note that
w+ = 2u+ + u− is in conv(3u+ , 3u− ), w− = v+ + v− is in conv(2v+ , 2v− )
but they are not vertices. Thus w is not in the universal Gröbner basis of A.
Note that A has 12 different minimal Markov bases. Of those bases, exactly 4
are subsets of U. Moreover |M| = 14 and |M ∩ U| = 6. Moreover, computing
with 4ti2[1], we get that G = M and |U| = 6.
3. Generalized Lawrence liftings
Let L ⊂ Zn be a lattice. We say that 0 6= u is L–primitive if Qu ∩ L = Zu.
Suppose that L is non positive. In [3] it was shown that there exists an L–
primitive element u ∈ L∩Nn such that supp(u) = supp Lpure , [3, Proposition
2.7, Proposition 2.10]. If L = L(A) then this element can be extended to a
minimal basis of Lpure and then to a minimal Markov basis of A of minimal
cardinality by [3, Theorem 2.12, Theorem 4.1, Theorem 4.11]. This is the
point of the next lemma.
Lemma 3.1. If L is non positive, there exists an L–primitive element v ∈ Nn
such that v is in the universal Markov basis of A and supp(v) = supp Lpure .
Markov bases and generalized Lawrence liftings
7
Let A ∈ Mm×n (Z), B ∈ Mp×n (Z) and an integer r ≥ 2. We let
Lr := L(Λ(A, B, r)),
LA,B := KerZ (A) ∩ KerZ (B) .
We note that Lr ⊂ Zrn while LA,B ⊂ Zn .
Proposition 3.2. LA,B is positive if and only if Lr is positive for any r ≥ 2.
Proof. Let C ∈ LA,B ∩Nn . We think of the elements of Lr as r×n matrices, as
explained in the introduction. We have that [C · · · C]T ∈ Lr ∩Nrn . Conversely,
if [C1 · · · Cr ]T ∈ Lr ∩ Nrn then C1 + · · · + Cr ∈ LA,B ∩ Nn .
Suppose that Lr is positive. Let W ∈ Lr and let W the corresponding
r × n matrix with wi as its i-th row. We define σ(W) = {i : wi 6= 0, 1 ≤
i ≤ r}. Thus the type of W is the cardinality of σ(W). The Λ(A, B, r)–degree
of W is the vector Λ(A, B, r)W + . Thus the Λ(A, B, r)–degree of W is in the
span N(ai ⊗ ej ⊕ bi : 1 ≤ i ≤ n, j ∈ σ(W)). It is well known that the
Λ(A, B, r)–degrees of any minimal Markov basis of Λ(A, B, r) are invariants
of Λ(A, B, r), see [11].
Theorem 3.3. When Lr is positive the complexity of a minimal Markov basis
of Λ(A, B, r) is an invariant of Λ(A, B, r).
Proof. Let M1 , M2 be two minimal Markov bases of ILr . It is enough to show
that the complexity of M1 is less than or equal to the complexity of M2 . Let
W = [w1 · · · wr ]T ∈ M1 be such that the type of W is equal to the complexity
of M1 . We let V = [v1 · · · vr ]T ∈ M2 be such that the Λ(A, B, r)-degree of V
is the same as the Λ(A, B, r)-degree of W . Thus the Λ(A, B, r)–degree of V is
in N(ai ⊗ ej ⊕ bi : 1 ≤ i ≤ n, j ∈ σ(W)). This implies that vi+ = 0 for every
i 6∈ σ(W). Since every nonzero element in KerZ (A) has a nonzero positive part
(and a nonzero negative part) it follows that vi = 0 for every i 6∈ σ(W). Thus
σ(V) ⊂ σ(W). Reversing the argument we get that σ(W) = σ(V). Therefore
the complexity of M1 is less than or equal to the complexity of M2 .
As in [8, Theorem 3.5] one can prove the following statement for arbitrary integer matrices A ∈ Mm×n (Z), B ∈ Mp×n (Z). We denote by Gr(A)
the matrix whose columns are the vectors of the Graver basis of A.
Theorem 3.4. The Graver complexity g(A, B) is the maximum 1–norm of any
element in the Graver basis G(B·Gr(A)). In particular, we have g(A, B) < ∞.
Suppose that Lr is non positive. Next we show that Λ(A, B, r) has a
minimal Markov basis (of minimal cardinality) whose complexity is r.
Theorem 3.5. Suppose that Lr is non positive. There exists a minimal Markov
basis of Λ(A, B, r) of minimal cardinality, that contains an element of type
r.
Proof. We first show that Lr ∩ Nrn has an element of type r. By Lemma 3.2,
LA,B is non positive. We let w ∈ LA,B ∩ Nn be such that supp(w) =
8
Charalambous, Thoma and Vladoiu
supp((LA,B )pure ). It follows that
w
..
rn
. ∈ Lr ∩ N
w
has type r. Since (Lr )pure = hLr ∩ Nrn i, we are done by Lemma 3.1.
Remark 3.6. Suppose that r ≥ 2 and Lr is non positive. Let v be the Lr primitive element of Lemma 3.1. By adding positive multiples of v to the
other elements of the Markov basis of Lemma 3.1 the new set is still a minimal
Markov basis of Λ(A, B, r) with the property that all of its elements are of
type r (see [3]).
In the next example we give matrices A, B so that for any r ≥ 2
L(Λ(A, B, r)) is non positive and has the following interesting property: it
possesses minimal Markov bases of complexity ranging from 2 to r.
Example 3.7. We let A1 ∈ M2 (Z), A2 ∈ M2 (Z), B2 ∈ M2 (Z) and A, B ∈
M2×4 (Z) be the following matrices:
1 1
0 0
1 −1
A1 =
, A2 =
, A = (A1 |A2 ) , B2 =
,
0 0
1 −1
0 0
B = (I2 |B2 ) .
We consider the matrix Λ(A, B, r). After column permutations it follows
that Λ(A, B, r) =
A2 0
0
A 0
0
A1 0
0
0 A
0 A1
0
0 A2
0
0
.
.
.
..
..
..
.
→
0 0
0
0
A1
0
0
A2
A
B2 B2 · · · B2
I2 I2 · · · I2
B B ··· B
We note that the lattice L (Λ(A1 , I2 , r)|Λ(A2 , B2 , r)) is isomorphic to the
direct sum of the lattices L(Λ(A1 , I2 , r)) and L(Λ(A2 , B2 , r)).
The matrix Λ(A1 , I2 , r) is the defining matrix of the toric ideal of the
complete bipartite graph K2,r and has a unique minimal Markov basis corresponding to cycles of length 4: all its elements have type 2, see [9] and [12].
We denote by Ci the columns of Λ(A2 , B2 , r), for i = 1, . . . , 2r. We note that
C1 , C3 , . . . , C2r−1 are linearly independent while C2l−1 = −C2l for 1 ≤ l ≤ r.
It follows that the lattice L(Λ(A2 , B2 , r)) has rank r and is pure. Thus it has
infinitely many Markov bases ( see [3]). We consider the following minimal
Markov basis of Λ(A2 , B2 , r) consisting of elements of type 1:
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0 1 1
0 0
{ . . , . . , . . . , . . }.
.. .. .. ..
.. ..
0
0
0 0
1 1
Markov bases and generalized Lawrence liftings
9
For fixed 1 ≤ a ≤ r and 1 ≤ b ≤ 4 we let Ea,b be the matrix of
Mr×4 (Z) which has 1 on the (a, b)-th entry and 0 everywhere else. Moreover
for 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r and 1 ≤ s ≤ r, we let Pi,j ∈ Mr×4 (Z) and Ts ∈ Mr×4 (Z)
be the matrices
Pi,j = Ei,1 − Ei,2 − Ej,1 + Ej,2 ,
Ts = Es,3 + Es,4 .
It follows that the set M = {T1 , . . . , Tr } ∪ {Pi,j : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r} is a
minimal Markov basis of Λ(A, B, r) of cardinality r + r2 . The elements of
M have type 1 and 2, therefore the complexity of this Markov basis is 2.
Note that the set
{T1 , T1 + T2 , . . . , T1 + · · · + Tk , Tk+1 , · · · , Tr } ∪ {Pi,j : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r}
is a minimal Markov basis of Λ(A, B, r) and the type of its elements range
from 1 to k, where 2 ≤ k ≤ r. Therefore for any integer k between 2 and r
there are minimalPMarkov bases of Λ(A, B, r) of complexity k.
r
Moreover if T = s=1 Ts , then the set
{T, T + T2 , . . . , T + Tr } ∪ {T + Pi,j : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r}
is a minimal Markov basis of Λ(A, B, r) such that all its elements are of type
r (see [3]).
We remark that if S is any integer linear combination of the elements
Ts , 1 ≤ s ≤ r and 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r then the element S + Pi,j belongs to the
infinite universal Markov basis of Λ(A, B, r).
Remark 3.8. As pointed out in the introduction, in the literature there are
two definitions of Markov complexity. The one introduced in [10], namely the
smallest integer m such that there exists a Markov basis of Λ(A, B, r) of type
less than or equal to m for any r ≥ 2, is always finite: there exists a minimal Markov basis inside the Graver basis and thus (this) Markov complexity
is always smaller than the Graver complexity. When LA,B is a positive lattice then Theorem 3.3 becomes essential in the computation of this Markov
complexity: it guarantees that all minimal Markov bases have the same complexity. Even when LA,B is a non positive lattice this Markov complexity is
finite. For example, the Markov complexity of (A, B) of Example 3.7 is equal
to 2. The second definition was given in [8] where the Markov complexity
of (A, B) is the largest type of any element in the universal Markov basis of
Λ(A, B, r) as r varies. It is clear form Theorem 3.5 that this Markov complexity is infinite if LA,B is a non positive lattice. We point out that when LA,B
is a positive lattice which is the main case of interest in Algebraic Statistics,
by Theorem 3.3, all minimal Markov bases of Λ(A, B, r) have the same complexity for r ≥ 2 and thus the definition of [8] agrees computationally with
the definition of [10].
Acknowledgment. This paper was partially written during the visit of
the first and third author at the University of Ioannina. The third author
was supported by a Romanian grant awarded by UEFISCDI, project number
83/2010, PNII-RU code TE 46/2010, program Human Resources, “Algebraic
modeling of some combinatorial objects and computational applications”.
10
Charalambous, Thoma and Vladoiu
References
[1] 4ti2 team, 4ti2 - a software package for algebraic, geometric and combinatorial
problems on linear spaces, available at www.4ti2.de, 2007.
[2] H. Charalambous, A. Katsabekis, A. Thoma, Minimal systems of binomial
generators and the indispensable complex of a toric ideal, Proc. Amer. Math.
Soc. 135, 3443–3451 (2007).
[3] H. Charalambous, A. Thoma, M. Vladoiu, Markov bases of lattice ideals,
arXiv:1303.2303v2.
[4] P. Diaconis, B. Sturmfels, Algebraic algorithms for sampling from conditional
distributions, Ann. Statist. 26, 363–397 (1998).
[5] M. Drton, B. Sturmfels, S. Sullivant, Lectures on algebraic statistics, Oberwolfach Seminars, 39. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, viii+171 pp (2009).
[6] J. E. Graver, On the foundations of linear and integer linear programming I,
Math. Program. 9, 207–226 (1975).
[7] R. Hemmecke, K. Nairn, On the Gröbner complexity of matrices, J. Pure Appl.
Alg. 213, 1558–1563 (2009).
[8] S. Hoşten, S. Sullivant, A finiteness theorem for Markov bases of hierarchical
models, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 114, 311–321 (2007).
[9] H. Ohsugi, T. Hibi, Indispensable binomials of finite graphs, J. Algebra Appl.
4, 421–434 (2005).
[10] F. Santos, B. Sturmfels, Higher Lawrence configurations, J. Combin. Theory
Ser. A 103, 151–164 (2003).
[11] B. Sturmfels, Gröbner Bases and Convex Polytopes, University Lecture Series,
No 8, AMS, R.I. (1995).
[12] R. Villarreal, Rees algebras of edge ideals, Comm. Algebra 23, 3513–3524
(1995).
Hara Charalambous
Department of Mathematics
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki 54124
Greece
e-mail: [email protected]
Apostolos Thoma
Department of Mathematics
University of Ioannina
Ioannina 45110
Greece
e-mail: [email protected]
Marius Vladoiu
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
University of Bucharest
Str. Academiei 14
Bucharest, RO-010014
Romania
e-mail: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Protofold II:
Enhanced Model and Implementation for Kinetostatic Protein Folding∗
Pouya Tavousi1 , Morad Behandish2 , Horea T. Ilieş1,2 , and Kazem Kazerounian1
1
Kinematics Design Laboratory and 2 Computational Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, USA
arXiv:1712.05012v1 [cs.CE] 14 Nov 2017
Technical Report No. CDL-TR-16-03, March 22, 2016
form of enzymes, antibodies, motor proteins, transport proteins, etc. [3]. The function of a protein strongly depends on
its 3D structure (i.e., ‘conformation’) which in turn can be
directly determined from the linear sequence of amino acids
(AAs) linked together to form the protein chain (i.e., ‘configuration’) [4].1 Therefore, the computer-aided prediction
of the folded structure of a protein from the knowledge of
its sequence (referred to as ‘protein folding’) is the key to
understanding many biological processes in the cell. This
knowledge is crucial toward the ultimate goal of modeling
proper function or malfunction at molecular and cellular level
(e.g., deadly diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, etc.) and is central to a variety of bioengineering applications including ‘protein engineering’ [5, 6].
A reliable prediction of 3D protein structures from sequence
data remains a big challenge due to both theoretical and computational difficulties. We have previously shown that our kinetostatic compliance method (KCM) implemented into the Protofold
package can overcome some of the key difficulties faced by other
de novo structure prediction methods, such as the very small time
steps required by the molecular dynamics (MD) approaches or the
very large number of samples needed by the Monte Carlo (MC)
sampling techniques. In this article, we improve the free energy
formulation used in Protofold by including the typically underrated entropic effects, imparted due to differences in hydrophobicity of the chemical groups, which dominate the folding of most
water-soluble proteins. In addition to the model enhancement,
we revisit the numerical implementation by redesigning the algorithms and introducing efficient data structures that reduce the
expected complexity from quadratic to linear. Moreover, we develop and optimize parallel implementations of the algorithms on
both central and graphics processing units (CPU/GPU) achieving speed-ups up to two orders of magnitude on the GPU. Our
simulations are consistent with the general behavior observed in
the folding process in aqueous solvent, confirming the effectiveness of model improvements. We report on the folding process
at multiple levels; namely, the formation of secondary structural
elements and tertiary interactions between secondary elements or
across larger domains. We also observe significant enhancements
in running times that make the folding simulation tractable for
large molecules.
1
1.1
Related Work
There are several different computational approaches for protein folding prediction, ranging from knowledge-based techniques to methods starting from physical principles [7].
Knowledge-Based Methods. The knowledge-based approaches predict the structure of a given protein using the
information extracted from previously determined structures
and known types of folds. They are generally more reliable
than physics-based methods, but have limited applicability in
predicting new types of folds. Examples of knowledge-based
techniques are homology or comparative modeling [8–10] and
fold recognition or threading [11–13]. We refer the reader
to [7] for a comprehensive review of such methods.
Introduction
Physics-Based Methods. On the other hand, methods
that utilize models formulated empirically or obtained from
physical principles are less reliable and more time-consuming,
∗ This article was submitted on 09/08/2015 and published on
but apply to a wider range of folding simulations [7]. These
03/22/2016 in the ASME JNEM. For citation, please use:
methods range from de novo [14, 15] to ab initio [16, 17] prediction techniques. Here we briefly review some of the comTavousi, Pouya and Behandish, Morad and Ilieş, Horea T. and
Kazerounian, Kazem, 2016. “Protofold II: Enhanced Model and mon ab initio approaches, namely sampling methods and MD
Implementation for Kinetostatic Protein Folding.” Journal of Nan- simulations [7].
Proteins are large biomolecules that are responsible for a vast
array of biological functions inside the cell, and appear in the
otechnology in Engineering and Medicine, 6(3), p.034601.
1 In the robotics literature, the term configuration is typically used
to describe the complete set of kinematic variables. However, the term
conformation is typically used for that purpose in molecular biology.
This article is based on two shorter conference papers presented
at the ASME IDETC/CIE’2013 [1, 2].
1
Sampling methods generate numerous samples in the conformation space, followed by an evaluation of their free energies. Different search algorithms are used to find the unchallenged global minimum of the free energy, assumed to be
associated with the native structure according to the ‘thermodynamic hypothesis’ [4]. These search methods include
simulated annealing [18, 19], basin hopping [20–23], evolutionary algorithms [24–26] and MC simulation with biased
moves [27–29]. A review of conformation sampling methods
for protein folding can be found in [30]. Sampling methods
have two major limitations, namely 1) they do not provide
any information about the biological pathway; and 2) finding
the global minimum is not guaranteed because of the finite
number of samples.
On the other hand, MD approaches simulate the biological
pathway using a model built upon physical principles. Standard MD techniques include Newtonian dynamics [31–34],
Langevin dynamics [35–38] and Brownian dynamics [39–42].
A review of MD simulation methods for protein folding is
provided in [43]. In order to keep the numerical algorithms
stable, very small time steps (in the order of femtoseconds)
along the simulation trajectory are required, which does not
support folding simulation of typical proteins that span milliseconds except for small molecules [43].
protein—e.g., Coulombic and van der Waals forces exchanged
between atoms of the protein itself, ignoring the interactions
with solvent molecules. However, an important class of biologically significant proteins are water-soluble, whose folding
process is predominantly driven by the interactions with the
solvent, particularly the so-called ‘hydrophobic effect’2 which
was missing from Protofold I [48].
Computing Solvation Effects. From a computational
perspective, the solvation effects can be modeled in a number of different ways, broadly classified into ‘explicit’ and
‘implicit’ techniques.
The explicit methods use all-atom force field models such
as SPC, SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP5P [55, 56], or coarse-grained
(CG) models [57,58] which are less structured representations
of the solvent obtained by mapping two or more particles onto
a single interaction site [55]. A prohibitive computational
cost is associated with the large number of solvent molecules
required to model a bulk solution.
Alternatively, approximate schemes that include the solvent effects implicitly can provide useful quantitative estimates, yet remain computationally inexpensive [59]. The
implicit models estimate the contribution of each solventexposed atom to the solvation free energy using empirical formulae, most commonly expressed as a linear function of the
solvent accessible surface area (SASA) [60]. An exact computation of SASA requires obtaining the surface area of the
envelope of overlapping spheres [61], which is computationally expensive. Alternatively, approximate formulations have
been developed to efficiently predict the expected (i.e., probabilistic average) SASA based on simplifying assumptions
on the distribution of the coordinates of atoms (or groups
of atoms) in the 3D space. For instance, CHARMM [62]
uses the probabilistic approach from [63], which estimates the
SASA as a function of the distances between pairs of atoms or
residues. A similar model with similar parametrization [64]
was used in GROMOS [65], a recent improvement of which
was given in [66]. AMBER [67, 68] uses a fast linear combination of pairwise overlaps (LCPO) algorithm [69], which
improves the method in [63] by adding more terms to the approximation. Although being widely popular in well-known
MD packages, these methods rely on simplifying assumptions
that compromise accuracy. For example, the method in [63]
assumes a uniform random spatial distribution of atoms or
residues, which introduces bias into the simulation results.
The inclusion of the solvation free energy computed using
an adequately accurate evaluation of the SASA [1, 2] results
in a more realistic energy- and force-model for simulating the
natural behavior of water-soluble proteins.
Kinetostatic Compliance Method. The KCM was introduced in [44, 45] to overcome some of the key challenges
in the aforementioned approaches. In this method, implemented in the software package Protofold [46–48], the protein
chain is modeled as a kinematic linkage which complies under the kinetostatic effect of the force-field obtained form
intramolecular interactions between the atoms. The key contributions of KCM were
1. modeling the constrained kinematics of the protein chain
with significantly fewer degrees of freedom (DOF) than,
for example, those of the ‘beads and springs’ model used
in many MD methods; and
2. converging faster to the minimum energy state by using kinetostatic (i.e., 1st-order) variations rather than
dynamic (i.e., 2nd-order) response.
In KCM, each rotatable joint, used to model the constrained
motion of the chemical bonds, changes by an amount proportional to the effective torque on that joint. It was shown
that KCM is a faster and more stable alternative to the traditional dynamic simulation techniques [48]. The Protofold
platform has since provided a kinematic testbed for subsequent research activities. Examples are predicting hydrogen
bond connectivity sub-graphs [49], its application to the design of stable peptide nano-particles [50], the analysis of protein mobility (using the ‘pebble game’ algorithm) [51], the
development of mechanical models for secondary structural
elements [52], and nano-machanism synthesis from a ‘link
soup’ of pre-specified structural elements [53, 54].
In the earlier stages of the development, the energetics were
limited to intramolecular interactions in the gas-phase of the
2 The
hydrophobic effect is explained as the strong tendency of nonpolar sidechains to pack together to form a hydrophobic core protected
from the solvent by a hydrophilic surface [3]. This effect is formulated
in terms of entropic changes in the solvent molecules surrounding the
protein surface.
2
1.2
Outline & Contributions
the modern graphics hardware—onto which our data-parallel
SASA enumeration algorithm maps perfectly—we present a
In Section 2, we introduce an improved free energy model
GPU-parallel implementation and its optimization. The immaking use of the linear implicit model given in [60] to complementation takes advantage of the device memory hierarchy
pute the solvation free energy- and force-field from a knowland hiding memory access latencies, in turn leading to larger
edge of the SASA and its gradient for individual atoms at a
speed-ups (up to two orders of magnitude).
given 3D conformation. We develop a simple offset surface
enumeration technique that can approximate the SASA and
its gradient up to any desired accuracy. Our method is sig2 Formulation
nificantly more accurate than the probabilistic methods such
as those given in [63, 69] yet noteably faster than the exact Section 2.1 starts with an overview of the underlying kinemethod given in [61], while the trade-off between speed and matic principles of the KCM simulation first introduced in
accuracy can be adjusted by a proper choice of the enumer- [44–48]. The protein chain is modeled as an open kinematic
ation (i.e., surface sampling) density.
linkage with reduced DOF in terms of dihedral and rotamer
A second major contribution of this work is to develop angles, which complies under the effect of interatomic and solsignificantly more efficient algorithms and data structures in vation forces. Next, the energy- and force-field formulation
Section 3 to speed up the computations, and to implement used in Protofold II is described in Section 2.2, with special
them into Protofold II:
emphasis on the newly introduced solvation effects. Lastly,
1. We use a 3D hash table data structure based on a uni- the KCM optimization process is presented in Section 2.3.
form spatial grid that supports fast queries to identify
pairs of proximal atoms. This helps speeding up the 2.1 Kinematic Model
computations by eliminating negligibly small interactions associated with pairs of atoms that are farther than Proteins are long polymeric chains made of AAs, which exist
in only 20 different types (except for few rare exceptions),
a so-called ‘cut-off distance’.
joined together as a linear polypeptide chain [3], structural
2. We use a tree-based data structure to span the protein details of which are summarized in Appendix A. Here we rechain efficiently for the purpose of characterizing inter- strict ourselves to the kinematic representation of the chain’s
action types between pairs of atoms based on their dis- conformation within the scope of KCM.
tances along the topological structure of the chain.
Linkage Parameterization. Figure 1 schematically illustrates the repetitive sequence of −N−Cα −C− atoms,4 called
the ‘backbone’ or the ‘main chain’, with ‘side chains’ resembling branches that extend out of it. As explained in Appendix A, the backbone conformation can be specified to an
adequate accuracy by two sets of dihedral angles; namely,
3. We develop sequential and parallel surface enumeration
algorithms to compute the SASA and its gradient for
individual atoms needed for the solvation energy and
force computations, respectively, up to desired accuracy.
4. We employ prefix sums [70] to compute the joint torques
on the kinematic linkage of the protein chain, given the
resultant forces on the individual atoms.
• −180◦ ≤ φi < +180◦ (around N−Cα in AAi ); and
• −180◦ ≤ ψi < +180◦ (around Cα −C in AAi );
As a result, the numerical complexity for each KCM cycle,
including the computation of resultant forces on the atoms
and the links (except those resulting from solvation effects)
and their conversion to joint torques, is reduced from O(n2 )
in Protofold I [48] to O(n) in Protofold II, where n is the
number of atoms in the protein molecule.3
The SASA evaluations for solvation force computations
in our model turns out to be the bottleneck to the entire
simulation—up to several orders of magnitude slower than
the electrostatic and van der Waals force computations. Fortunately, the surface enumeration algorithm lends itself well
to high-throughput data parallelism. In Section 4 we first
present the CPU-parallel implementation using OpenMP,
leading to moderate speed-up factors (up to one order of magnitude). To leverage the massive processing power offered by
the single-instruction multiple-thread (SIMT) architecture of
for 1 ≤ i ≤ m, where m is the number of AA residues along
the chain. The conformation of each side chain, on the other
hand, can be specified by up to 4 extra angles −180◦ ≤ χi,k <
+180◦ for 1 ≤ k ≤ li where 0 ≤ li ≤ 4 is the number of side
chain links of AAi , and the subscript k corresponds to the
bonds numbered in the obvious order along the side chain C
and N atoms.
To set a reference for the angle measurements, the zeroreference position description (ZRPD) method [71] is used.
The zero-position (ZP) for the protein chain is defined as
the conformation of the serial linkage in which all peptide
planes are coplanar (i.e., φ0i = ψi0 = −180◦ ) and side chain
dihedrals are set to default low energy values identified as
‘rotamers’ [45].
3 This is only the case under certain assumptions given in the Section
3.2, which are relatively reasonable for practical cases.
4 Hereon, the notations C
α and C correspond to the alpha-carbon
and carboxyl-carbon, respectively.
3
Figure 1: The polypeptide chain is modeled as a kinematic linkage, in which the peptide planes are assumed to be rigid.
• b2i,0 (1 ≤ i ≤ m) is the base vector that connects the
Cα of AAi to the N of AAi+1 ; and
To unify the notations, all angular variables are denoted
by θj,k (1 ≤ j ≤ 2m, 0 ≤ k ≤ 4) where
θ2i−1,0 = φi + 180◦ ,
1 ≤ i ≤ m,
(1)
= ψi + 180◦ ,
1 ≤ i ≤ m,
(2)
θ2i,0
• b2i−1,k (1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ k ≤ 4) are the base vectors
along the successive side chain C and N atoms.
The first two sets of vectors listed above are called the ‘main
chain body vectors’. Every vector in the peptide plane that
◦
◦
where 0 ≤ θj,k < 360 . The shifts in (1) and (2) by the in- describes the relative positions of any two atoms can be
tercept values of φ0i = ψi0 = −180◦ and in (3) by the favorable obtained as a linear combination of these base vectors as
rotamer angles χ0i,k ensure θj,k = 0◦ at the ZP conformation. C1 b2i,0 + C2 b2i+1,0 . The coefficients C1 and C2 , referred
A similar indexing scheme is used to identify the unit vec- to as ‘peptide plane constants’, are invariant with respect to
tors along the rotation axes of revolute joints associated with the rotations in the chain, thus can be precomputed prior to
the KCM simulation. Different pairs of coefficients are used
these angles denoted by uj,k (1 ≤ j ≤ 2m, 0 ≤ k ≤ 4), i.e.,
for vectors describing the relative positions of different pairs
• u2i−1,0 (1 ≤ i ≤ m) is the unit vector along the bond of atoms. Based on experimental evidence, it is a reasonable assumption that these coefficients are the same across
between N of AAi and Cα of AAi ;
all AAs [72], and the average values are given in Table 1.5
• u2i,0 (1 ≤ i ≤ m) is the unit vector along the bond
In addition to the main chain body vectors, the ‘side chain
between Cα of AAi to the C of AAi ; and
body vectors’ (the third group listed above) are defined for
the relative positions of the C and N atoms along the side
• u2i−1,k (1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ k ≤ 4) are the unit vectors along chains. We refer the reader to [72] for more details about the
the successive side chain C and N atoms.
molecular model of the peptide unit.
For a protein chain with m AA residues, the number of
Thus the kinematics of the linkage—which abstracts the prolinks
can be obtained as
tein conformation—can be completely specified in terms of
!
m
X
the rigid body rotation transformations obtained from these
l = 2m +
li ≤ 6m = O(m),
(4)
rotation angles and rotation axes.
θ2i−1,k = χi,k −
χ0i,k ,
1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ k ≤ li ≤ 4,
(3)
i=1
The spatial orientation of the rigid peptide planes can be
described conveniently with a pair of base vectors whose lin- noting that li ≤ 4. The term 2m counts two rigid links per
ear combination spans the peptide plane. The so-called ‘body each AA’s backbone—one for −CO−NH− and one for −Cα −
vectors’ are denoted by bj,k (1 ≤ j ≤ 2m, 0 ≤ k ≤ 4), i.e.,
5 Nevertheless, in Protofold II the user has the option to choose
whether to use the values provided in Table 1 for all AAs, or to maintain
• b2i−1,0 (1 ≤ i ≤ m) is the base vector that connects the the refined values when available—e.g., when the protein is imported
from the protein data-bank (PDB).
N of AAi to the Cα of AAi ;
4
Table 1: Peptide plane constants for bond vectors [72].
BV
−−→
Cα C
−→
CN
C1
−0.2761
+1.2761
C2
+1.4488
−1.4488
BV
−→
CO
−→
NH
C1
−1.3324
+1.4103
where [Rr,s ] is the 3 × 3 matrix representation of the joint
rotation transformation Rr,s ∈ SO(3) around the ZP unit
vector u0r,s with an angle θr,s (1 ≤ r ≤ i, 0 ≤ s ≤ k) [45],
using the right-hand rule to choose the direction.
Once the body vectors are obtained using (6) for a given
conformation, the moved atom center positions can be computed for the individual atoms. Assuming that the N atom
at the amino-terminus is fixed at the origin, the coordinates
of the main chain N and Cα atoms are obtained as
C2
+2.3401
−2.5111
Table 2: Kinematic variables of the polypeptide linkage.
Symbol
θ2i−1,0
u2i−1,0
b2i−1,0
θ2i,0
u2i,0
b2i,0
θ2i−1,k
u2i−1,k
b2i−1,k
†
Description
Torsion angle φi around main chain N−Cα in AAi
Unit vector along main chain N−Cα in AAi
Body vector from N to Cα in AAi
Torsion angle ψi around main chain Cα −C in AAi
Unit vector along main chain Cα −C in AAi
Body vector from Cα in AAi to N in AAi+1 †
Torsion angle χi,k of side chain C/Ns in AAi
Unit vector along side chain C/Ns in AAi
Body vector connecting side chain Cs in AAi
[rj,0 ] =
j
X
[br,0 ],
1 ≤ j ≤ 2m − 1,
(9)
r=1
where the index j = 2i − 1 corresponds to the Cα atom of
residue AAi while the index j = 2i corresponds to the N atom
of the residue AAi+1 for 1 ≤ i ≤ m. The coordinates for the
other atoms in the peptide group, namely H, C and O, are
obtained from those for Cα and N, and a linear combination
C1 b2i,0 + C2 b2i+1,0 of main chain body vectors using the
coefficients C1 and C2 given in Table 1. For the side chain C
and N atoms, the coordinates are similarly obtained as
The exception is b2m,0 which connects Cα to the carboxyl H in AA2m .
in the peptide unit—in order to have each rigid link connected
k
2i−1
X
X
to the next with a single revolute joint along either N−Cα or
[b2i−1,s ], 1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ k ≤ 4,
[b
]
+
[r
]
=
r,0
2i−1,k
Cα −C, as depicted in Fig. 1. The second term accounts for
s=1
r=1
the number of additional side chain links. As a result, the
(10)
total DOF of the kinematic linkage is equal to the number of
where k = 1, 2, 3, and 4 corresponds to the successive side
links. Table 2 gives a complete description of dihedral angles,
chain C and N atoms in the residue AAi . The coordinates
unit vectors, and body vectors for the entire protein chain.
for all other side chain atoms are obtained similarly from
vectors along the side chain bonds subjected to the same set
Kinematic Equations. The instantaneous conformation of motions [44].
of the protein chain is related to the ZP conformation with
The atom position vectors obtained from (9) and (10) at
a set of rigid body transformations. Given a particular con- each iteration are used in Section 2.2 to compute the energies,
formation in terms of θj,k (1 ≤ j ≤ 2m, 0 ≤ k ≤ 4), the unit forces, and torques that will determine the motion for the
vectors and body vectors are transformed as follows:
subsequent iteration.
[uj,k ] = [Mj,k ][u0j,k ], 1 ≤ j ≤ 2m, 0 ≤ k ≤ 4,
(5)
[bj,k ] = [Mj,k ][b0j,k ],
1 ≤ j ≤ 2m, 0 ≤ k ≤ 4,
2.2
(6)
Force Model
The interatomic effects can be classified into covalent and
noncovalent interactions. The covalent interactions need not
be considered explicitly in the force-field, since they are implicitly introduced in terms of the kinematic constraints innate to the kinematic chain model adopted in Section 2.1.
The noncovalent forces, which are responsible for conformational changes in the protein chain, can be derived from the
free energy formulation that follows.
For a protein chain made of n atoms, we assign each atom
with a unique index 1 ≤ i ≤ n, and its center coordinates
ri ∈ R3 obtained from dihedral angles using kinematic equar=1
tions (9) and (10).6 Each atom is identified by a unique
while the transformation matrix for the side chain vectors tuple ai = (i, ri , Ri , qi , i , γi , · · · ) (1 ≤ i ≤ n), containing its
(k ≥ 1) is defined as a product of rotations around joints in index, position, radius, charge, well depth parameter, solvathe main chain, and those around the side chain:
tion parameter, and other atomic constants, to be introduced
shortly. The set of all the atoms in the molecule is denoted
2i−1
k
Y
Y
6 Note the slight change of notations from Section 2.1, where the
[M2i−1,k ] =
[Rr,0 ]
[R2i−1,s ], 1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ k ≤ 4,
where the superscript 0 indicates the reference ZP conformation. [Mj,k ] is the 3 × 3 matrix representation of the rigid
body transformation Mj,k ∈ SO(3) that maps the ZP unit
and body vectors u0j,k and b0j,k to their transformed orientations uj,k and bj,k , respectively. These vectors are expressed
using 3 × 1 column matrices. The transformation matrix for
the main chain vectors (k = 0) can be calculated as a product
of successive rotations around individual joints in the main
chain:
j
Y
[Mj,0 ] =
[Rr,0 ], 1 ≤ j ≤ 2m,
(7)
r=1
subscript j = 2i − 1 or 2i referred to the AA index 1 ≤ i ≤ m, while in
s=1
(8) Section 2.2 the single subscript 1 ≤ i ≤ n refers to the atom index.
5
by A = {a1 , a2 , · · · , an }. The aggregated free energy of all electrostatic interactions between atoms that are farther than
the atoms in A can be decomposed into the following terms: a so-called cut-off distance delec
cut := 9.0 Å are usually deemed
7
negligible
in
the
literature
[3].
Therefore (13) is approxiGtot (A) = Gelec (A) + Gvdw (A) + Gcav (A),
(11) mated as follows to reduce the number of pairwise computawhere Gelec (A) is the electrostatic energy, including in- tions between all the atoms:
X
1 qi qj
tramolecular charge interactions, hydrogen bonding effects,
ei,j ,
(14)
Felec
(Aelec
)≈
i
i
4πεi,j d2i,j
and the induced polarization in the solvent when the molecule
elec
a
∈A
j
i
is dissolved. Gvdw (A) is the sum of intramolecular van der
elec
Waals energies, also called ‘steric effects’, resulted from in- where Ai = {aj ∈ A − {ai } | di,j ≤ delec
cut } is referred to as
duced dipoles in the molecule. The sum of the first two terms the neighborhood of atom ai associated with the electrostatic
has been accounted for in Protofold I [46–48] using the AM- force-field, and consists of all the atoms whose distance to ai
BER force-field model [67]. Gcav (A) is the nonpolar solva- are bounded by the cut-off distance delec
cut .
tion free energy, the free energy change resulting from transfering a molecule from vacuum to solvent, i.e., the entropic Van der Waals Interactions. The van der Waals interacchange due to the formation of the cavity occupied by the tions are formulated using the empirical Lennard-Jones 6-12
instantaneous 3D shape of the protein [73]. Experimental potential function formula [67]:
"
12
6 #
results have shown that many water-soluble protein folding
X
X
D
D
i,j
i,j
vdw
reactions are predominantly driven by a favorable reduction
−2
,
G (A) =
i,j
di,j
di,j
in ∆Gcav (A) [3], hence we incorporated this term into the
ai ∈A aj ∈A−{ai }
improved energy formulation for Protofold II.
(15)
where di,j = kri − rj k2 is the interatomic center distance,
Electrostatic Interactions. The charge interactions are Di,j = Ri + Rj is the ‘van der Waals distance’ in which
formulated using the modified form of Coulomb’s law [67]:
Ri , Rj are the van der Waals radii of the atoms ai , aj ∈ A,
√
respectively.
i,j = i j is the ‘depth of potential well’ for
X
X
1 qi qj
elec
,
(12) the particular pair of atoms. It is worthwhile noting that
G (A) =
4πεi,j di,j
the van der Waals effects have the same origin as the electroai ∈A aj ∈A−{ai }
static forces, and reflect the induced dipoles due to transient
where di,j = kri − rj k2 is the interatomic center distance, fluctuations in electron clouds of the interacting atoms [3].
qi and qj are the electrostatic charges, and ri and rj are The resultant van der Waals force Fvdw = −∇ GvdW on the
ri
i
the position vectors of the pair of atoms ai , aj ∈ A, respec- atom a by other atoms is then obtained
as
i
tively. εi,j = κi,j ε0 is the ‘dielectric constant’ and is gen!
12
6
X
Di,j
Di,j
erally larger than vacuum permittivity ε0 ≈ 8.854 × 10−12
vdw
Fi (A) =
12i,j
ei,j ,
(16)
− 7
Farads (i.e., κi,j > 1). Thus (12) can be used to calculate
d13
di,j
i,j
aj ∈A−{ai }
the interactions between charges in the solvent, if a continuum dielectric model is used [3]. The dielectric constant where ei,j = (ri − rj )/di,j is the unit vector along the line
reflects the ability of the environment to attenuate electro- of centers of the pair of atoms ai , aj ∈ A. The van der
static interactions, e.g., κi,j ∼ 80 for aqueous solvent and Waals forces have a much smaller effect radius and are signifκi,j ∼ 2–4 for the interior of the protein [3], where the larger icant only when the atoms approach each other very closely.
value for the former is due to the induced polarization of The repulsive component becomes very large when the two
water molecules. It is worthwhile noting that because of atoms penetrate into each other, an effect widely known as
the nonuniformity of the dielectric medium, the most accu- the ‘steric clash’. The attractive component known as the
rate computation of the electrostatic energy requires solving ‘London dispersion’ force, on the other hand, is dominant
Poisson-Boltzman (PB) differential equations [74]. However, when the atoms are farther than the van der Waals distance
solving PB for every cycle of the KCM simulation is com- Di,j [3]. These interactions decay much faster than Coulomputationally expensive, and approximate alternatives such as bic forces, hence a smaller cut-off distance of dvdw
cut := 5.0 Å
generalized Born (GB) model can be used [75, 76]. A simple is sufficient [3] resulting in the following approximation:
!
distance-dependent dielectric constant is used here (following
12
6
X
Di,j
Di,j
vdw
vdw
the convention in [48]) to mimic the polarization effect, with
Fi (Ai ) ≈
12i,j
− 7
ei,j ,
(17)
d13
di,j
i,j
closer interactions weighted more heavily [67]. The resultant
aj ∈Avdw
i
Coulombic force Felec
= −∇ri Gelec applied on the atom ai
i
vdw
where Ai = {aj ∈ A − {ai } | di,j ≤ dvdw
cut } is referred to as
by other atoms is then obtained as
the neighborhood of the atom ai associated with the van der
X
1 qi qj
whose distance
ei,j ,
(13) Waals force-field, and consists of all the atoms
Felec
(A) =
i
vdw
4πεi,j d2i,j
to
a
are
bounded
by
the
cut-off
distance
d
.
i
cut
a ∈A−{a }
j
i
7 Our
experiments with larger molecules show that 9.0 Å is not al-
where ei,j = (ri − rj )/di,j is the unit vector along the line of ways a proper cut-off distance and larger values need to be used, as
centers of the pair of atoms ai , aj ∈ A. Since Felec
∝ 1/d2i,j , demonstrated in Section 5.3.
i
6
Table 3: Atomic solvation parameters adopted from [78]
for different adjustments by [79, 80].
Units are in
−2
kcal mol−1 Å .
Atom type
C
O/N
S
O−
N+
Adjustment in [79]
+0.004 ± 0.003
−0.113 ± 0.014
−0.017 ± 0.022
−0.166 ± 0.038
−0.169 ± 0.031
Adjustment in [80]
+0.012 ± 0.003
−0.116 ± 0.013
−0.018 ± 0.021
−0.175 ± 0.036
−0.186 ± 0.022
tain the atomic SASA at a given snapshot, a probe radius of
RH2 O = 1.2 − 1.4 Å is used to offset the van der Waals surfaces of the individual atoms as illustrated in Fig. 2. These
offset spheres are overlapped to obtain the contributions of
different atoms to the total SASA. The atomic solvation parameter γj is an estimate of the free energy per unit area
required to transfer the atom from vacuum to water, and depends on the atom type [78]. Table 3 shows the values of this
parameter for different atom types (namely, C, uncharged O
or N, S, O− , and N+ ) obtained in [78] based on the experimental results in [82] adjusted by [79, 80]. The hydrophobic
interaction forces Fcav
= −∇ri Gcav on the atom ai by other
i
atoms is then obtained as
X
Fcav
γj ∇ri Aexp
(21)
i (A) = −
j ,
Figure 2: The solvent-accessible and -excluded surfaces.
Interaction Classification. The interactions discussed so
far are between the pairs of atoms that are not covalently
bonded, thus (14) and (17) have to be modified to eliminate
the terms corresponding to the pairs of bonded atoms (i.e.,
‘1-2 interactions’). Furthermore, it is a common convention
in molecular mechanics to modify the electrostatic and van
der Waals interactions between the pairs of atoms bonded
to a common atom, i.e., atoms that are 2 bonds apart along
the chain (i.e., ‘1-3 interactions’), as well as the atoms that
are 3 bonds apart along the chain (i.e., ‘1-4 interactions’)
[77]. Consequently, the empirical forms of (14) and (17) are
modified as
elec
X wi,j
qi qj
elec
Felec
(A
)
≈
ei,j ,
(18)
i
i
4πε
d2i,j
i,j
elec
aj ∈Ai
!
6
12
X
D
D
i,j
i,j
vdw
Fvdw
(Avdw
)≈
− 7
ei,j , (19)
12wi,j
i,j
i
i
d13
di,j
i,j
vdW
aj ∈A
where ∇ri Aexp
is the gradient of the exposed area of the atom
j
aj due to an infinitesimal displacement of ai . It is important
to note that, unlike the force formulae presented earlier for
the electrostatic and van der Waals effects in (13) and (16),
the summation in (21) for the solvation free energy gradient
iterates over all aj ∈ A including ai itself.
aj ∈Ai
Considering the case when i = j, one realizes that displacing
the atom ai in any direction has the same effect on the
elec
vdw
where wi,j
and wi,j
are the weight factors for the electrogeometry of the protein surface as displacing all the other
static and van der Waals forces, respectively, for the pair
atoms in the opposite direction. Therefore
of atoms ai , aj ∈ A depending on their interaction type.
X
The weights are set to wi,j = 0 for 1-2 interactions, and
∇ri Aexp
=−
∇rj Aexp
(22)
i
i .
0 ≤ wi,j ≤ 1 for 1-3 and 1-4 interactions, whose values vary
aj ∈A−{ai }
across different force models [62, 65, 67, 68]. wi,j = 1 for all
other situations. In other words, the atoms that have at least Substituting for this term in (21) leads to the following sym4 bonds in between them along the graph of covalent bonds metric form, whose range of summation excludes ai itself,
are far enough to be considered unaffected by the covalent similar to (13) and (16):
electron clouds, as originally formulated in (14) and (17).
X
exp
Fcav
−
γj ∇ri Aexp
i (A) = −γi ∇ri Ai
j
Nonpolar Solvation Effects. The hydrophobic free enaj ∈A−{ai }
X
ergy of solvation, which reflects the entropy changes in the
=
γi ∇rj Aexp
− γj ∇ri Aexp
.
(23)
i
j
solvent molecules due to cavity creation, is formulated using
aj ∈A−{ai }
the linear empirical formulation in [78]:
X
We show in Section 4 that (23) is computationally preferable
Gcav (A) =
γj Aexp
(20)
j ,
over (21). To further simplify (23), note that for a pair of
aj ∈A
atoms ai and aj the infinitesimal displacement of one does not
where γj is the atomic solvation parameter and Aexp
is the affect the overlapped solvent exposed area of the other if their
j
Lee and Richards SASA for the atom aj ∈ A [81]. To ob- offset spheres (i.e., the spheres with radii Rioff = Ri + RH2 O
7
and Rjoff = Rj + RH2 O , respectively) do not intersect, i.e.,
∇ri Aexp
= ∇rj Aexp
= 0 if di,j > Ri +Rj +2RH2 O . Therefore,
j
i
the number of terms that contribute a nonzero value to the
summation of (23) is significantly reduced:
X
cav
− γj ∇rj Aexp
,
(24)
γi ∇ri Aexp
Fcav
i (Ai ) =
i
j
aj ∈Acav
i
where Acav
= {aj ∈ A − {ai } | di,j ≤ Ri + Rj + 2RH2 O }
i
is referred to as the neighborhood of the atom ai associated
with the nonpolar solvent effects. For practical reasons that
will be explained in Section 3.2, we use a larger neighborhood
= {aj ∈ A − {ai } | di,j ≤ dcav
redefined as Acav
cut } using the
i
more conservative (but constant across all pairs of atoms)
cut-off distance of dcav
cut := 2(Rmax + RH2 O ), where Rmax =
maxai ∈A {Ri }. A value of dcav
cut := 8.0 Å is typically safe. Note
that unlike the case with (13) and (16), eliminating pairwise
interactions with di,j > 8.0 Å from (24) does not impart an
approximation error.
Figure 3: The forces on each link are converted into an equivalent set of joint torques on the preceding joints in the chain.
denoted as ηk,h (1 ≤ k ≤ h, 1 ≤ h ≤ l), can be computed
using the conventional manipulator Jacobian matrix [J] [48]:
link
Th
T
[ηh ] = [J]
,
(27)
Flink
h
where [ηh ] = [η1,h , η2,h , · · · , ηh,h ]T represents an h × 1 array
of joint torques that the end-effector force and torque will
We use the KCM (presented in [44–48] for protein folding) to induce on the different joints preceding the end-effector along
T
explicitly integrate the conformational changes of the linkage the serial chain. [J] is the transpose of the 6 × h Jacobian
model under the kinetostatic effect of the force-field com- matrix [J] = [J1 , J2 , · · · , Jh ] for a given configuration of the
chain [48]. The k th column of the Jacobian associated with
puted in Section 2.2.
the k th revolute joint is given by
Link Forces and Torques. For a protein chain with a
uk
[J
]
=
,
(28)
k
total of l = O(m) links, where m is the number of AA
uk × (ph − pk )
th
residues, the resultant force and torque applied to the j
where uk is the unit vector along the k th joint and (ph − pk )
link (1 ≤ j ≤ l) are computed as
is a vector connecting a point pk along the k th joint’s axis
X
link
elec
vdw
cav
Fj =
Fi + Fi + Fi
,
(25) to the point ph where the end-effector force Fh applies—i.e.,
the atom positions obtained from (9) and (10). This process
ai ∈Lj
X
is repeated for all links to calculate the contribution of each
Tlink
=
ri × Felec
+ Fvdw
+ Fcav
,
(26)
j
i
i
i
link on the joints preceding that link in the serial chain. The
ai ∈Lj
total torque for each joint is obtained from a summation of
where ri is the absolute center position vector of the atom these contributions [48]:
2.3
Kinetostatic Simulation
ai ∈ A obtained from (9) and (10) in Section 2.1 (with dif
l
X
Tlink
T
h
ferent index notation), and Lj ⊂ A is the subset of atoms
τk = [Jk ]
,
(29)
Flink
that belong to the j th link along the chain. Note that the
h
h=k
origin of the absolute coordinate system (arbitrarily picked
the same as the N-terminus anchor of the chain) is selected where the indexing h = k, k + 1, · · · , l of the links is ordered along the main chain from amino-terminus to carboxylas the torque center for all links.
terminus, and can branch along the side chains. The range
of the summation in (29) implies that each joint torque
Equivalent Joint Torques. Since the revolute joints are
τ (1 ≤ k ≤ l) depends on the forces Flink
and torques Tlink
h
h
assumed to be frictionless, the action of the link forces and k
on the succeeding links (k ≤ h ≤ l).
torques can be replaced by an equivalent set of torques acting
on the joints [48], as shown in Fig. 3. For a given rigid
link, one can trace a unique serial chain of h successive links Kinetostatic Simulation. Making use of the assumption
(1 ≤ h ≤ l) starting from the N-terminus and ending at the in [48] that the inertia forces at the atomic scale have neglink under consideration, which is equivalent to a path along ligible effects on the dynamics of folding compared to inthe graph of the open linkage. The contribution of the force teratomic forces, the successive kinetostatic fold compliance
Flink
and the torque Tlink
applied to the end-effector link relates the joint torques to the changes in the dihedral angles
h
h
th
(i.e., the h link along the serial chain) to the joint torque as follows:
τj
,
(30)
∆θj = κ
at the k th joint along the chain preceding the end-effector,
|τmax |
8
0 ≤ li ≤ 4 is the number of side chain links of the residue
t−1
t−1
t
AAi ), the angles are obtained as θj,k
= θj,k
+ ∆θj,k
,
t−1
where the increment ∆θj,k is computed using (30) from
the previous step’s configuration and joint torques.
where ∆θj and τj are the angular change and the joint torque
of the j th revolute joint (1 ≤ j ≤ l), respectively. |τmax |
is the maximum joint torque throughout the entire chain,
used to normalize the torques to the interval [0, 1], and the
coefficient κ is chosen small enough to avoid large changes in
the angles, and to achieve numerical stability. One can notice
that the conformational change computed in (30) is analogous
to taking a step along the steepest-descent direction of the
free energy gradient in the conformation landscape.
The computed changes in the joint angles are applied to
the kinematic chain, and the entire process is repeated on the
updated conformation until a convergence criteria is reached,
as described in more detail is Section 4.
It is worthwhile noting that once the chain conformation
(i.e., optimization variables) is modeled as in Section 2.1 and
the energy-field (i.e., objective function) is formulated as in
Section 2.2, the search for local or global minima of the free
energy in (11) can be undertaken using a variety of classical
(e.g., conjugate-gradients) and stochastic (e.g., genetic algorithm) optimization methods. Since the focus of this article
is mainly on force-field modeling and computing, we skip a
detailed treatment of the search phase.
Once the dihedral angles are known, the transformation mat
trices [Mj,k
] are obtained from (7) and (8) using sequential
matrix multiplication traversing the linkage tree from the anchored amino-terminus to the open carboxyl-terminus. Next,
the unit vectors utj,k and the body vectors btj,k are computed
from (5) and (6). Since the number of links is clearly less
than the number of atoms, these computations take O(n)
time. The Cartesian coordinates of the individual atom center positions ri ∈ R3 (1 ≤ i ≤ n) are obtained from the body
vectors using (9) and (10), which also takes O(n). Hereon, we
assume that both dihedral angles and atom center positions
are known for the purpose of computing the next snapshot’s
energies, forces, and torques.
3.2
Proximity Queries
The brute-force approach for obtaining the proximity information at each snapshot is to check center distances against
the cut-off distance for all possible pairs of atoms, which takes
O(n2 ) time. Using this method, the approximate truncated
3 Algorithms
formulae given in (12), (15), and (20) would take the same
This section presents efficient algorithms and data structures asymptotic time as the exact all-pairs formulae given in (13),
to speed up the force field computation during kinetostatic (16), and (23), respectively, which is O(n2 ). Geometric hashiterations. To leverage the proximity information between ing provides a simple solution to speed up proximity queries.
the atoms, we use a 3D hash table data structure based on
a uniform spatial grid in Section 3.2. To classify the inter- 3D Hash Table. We use a 3D hash table data structure
atomic interaction types based on chain topology to compute based on a uniform Cartesian grid, which bounds the current
the electrostatic and van der Waals effects, we use a tree- 3D structure of the protein and arranges the atom indices into
based data structure in Section 3.3 that replaces the adja- groups based on their center positions. Each 3D grid cell is
cency matrix used in Protofold I [46–48]. To compute the sol- associated with a so-called ‘bucket’ that stores the indices of
vation effects, we develop an approximate (yet adequately ac- the atoms whose centers are located inside the cell in a linkedcurate) surface enumeration technique in 3.4, efficient CPU- list. The grid dimensions are set dynamically to adapt to the
and GPU-parallel implementations of which will be detailed shape of the protein’s bounding box at the current snapshot.
in Section 4. Finally, we compute joint torques by aggregatThe grid cells are chosen to be cubic, i.e., with equal edge
ing contributions of different links (traversed along different length s along all 3 Cartesian axes. Given the min/max
c
paths in the linkage graph) on the joints along the chain, us- corner coordinates of the bounding box of the atom centers
3
ing the well-known ‘prefix computation’ in Section 3.5 which r , r
min max ∈ R —which can be obtained in O(n) by scancan also be implemented efficiently in parallel [70]. We show ning through the n atom center coordinates—we choose s in
c
that the computational complexity of all steps is decreased such a way that it results in dαne grid cells/buckets, where
2
from O(n ) in Protofold I [46–48] to expected O(n) in Proto- α > 0 is an arbitrary constant. More precisely, we choose
1
fold II for a protein chain with a total of n atoms.
s = [v (A)/(αn)] 3 where v (A) is the protein bounding
c
BB
BB
box volume. The dimensions of the grid bounding box are
then chosen as d(rmax − rmin )/sc esc (slightly larger than the
3.1 Rigid Transformations
dimensions of the protein bounding box rmax − rmin ), where
At every snapshot t ≥ 0 of the KCM, the protein conformathe operator d·e is applied componentwise along the 3 Cartet
tion is described by a set of dihedral angles θj,k
defined in (1)
sian axes. Before we proceed with presenting the complexity
through (3).
analysis, we make the following assumptions:
• At the first iteration (t = 0), all angles are initialized as
Assumption 1 Due to the extremely strong repulsive van
0
θj,k
= 0 (ZP conformation).
der Waals forces, the atoms that are not covalently bonded
• At subsequent iterations (t ≥ 1), for 1 ≤ j ≤ 2m (where cannot penetrate into each other, and those covalently
m is the number of AA residues) and 0 ≤ k ≤ li (where bonded intersect over a small volume. Given any arbitrary
9
into the corresponding 3D array of buckets. The 3D index
k ∈ Z3 ∩ [0, +∞]3 of the bucket to which a given atom ai ∈ A
belongs is determined in O(1) time as k = b(ri − rmin )/sc c,
where the operator b·c is applied componentwise along the 3
Cartesian axes. Therefore, scanning through the atoms and
constructing the 3D grid data structure is expected to O(n)
time and to requires O(n) space.
Neighbor Queries. Once the atoms are arranged into the
buckets, the algorithm iterates through the grid cells and
scans through the linked-lists within the buckets. For each
atom ai in a given bucket associated with the grid cell index
k, the set of ‘neighbor atoms’ defined as
vdw cav
dcut ∈ {delec
cut , dcut , dcut }
(31)
can be identified rapidly for a given cut-off distance dcut associated with any of the energetic interactions explained in
Section 2.2. As illustrated
in Fig. 4, a spherical region
√
of radius rc = dcut + 3sc is considered around the (center point of) each grid cell to look for the (center point
of) ‘neighbor cells’, defined as the collection of cells which
completely lie inside this spherical region. The cut-off√distance dcut is offset by the diagonal size of the cells 3sc
which takes into account the worst-case difference of the distance between cell centers and the distance between atom
centers. This guarantees that the set of all the atoms inside this collection of covered cells (denoted as A0i ) contains the set of all neighbor atoms, i.e., A0i ⊇ Ai , where Ai
is one of the neighbor sets Aelec
, Avdw
, or Acav
i
i
i . Letting
A0 := A0i in Assumption 1, the volume occupied by this set
0
3
0
0
of atoms is v(A0i ) = 4π
3 |Ai |R̄ (Ai ). Noting that Ai is con3
tained inside the spherical region of radius rc , v(A0i ) ≤ 4π
3 rc
√
0
3
3
hence |Ai | ≤ (rc /R̄) = [(dcut + 3sc )/R̄] = O(1), since
R̄, sc ∼ 1 Å and dcut ∼ 10 Å. As a result, it is expected
to take O(1) time to scan through the atoms inside the collection of neighbor cells, and O(n) total time to traverse all
pairs of atoms using the 3D hash table.
For parallel implementation purposes, we construct (and
dynamically maintain) a ‘neighborhood matrix’ composed of
an array of n O(1)−sized linked-lists (one list per atom),
where the ith list (1 ≤ i ≤ n) contains the indices of the
neighbor atoms P
A0i . Constructing
Pn this data structure is exn
0
pected to take
|A
|
=
i
i=1
i=1 O(1) = O(n) time and
space, and accessing each atom’s neighbors is expected to
take |A0i | = O(1) time.
Ai = {aj ∈ A | kri − rj k2 ≤ dcut },
Figure 4: Atom centers are hashed into a 3D grid and the
neighbors are selected within a cut-off distance.
subset of atoms A0 ⊆ A with Rmin = minai ∈A0 Ri and
Rmax = maxai ∈A0 Ri , let the maximum penetration volume
between any pair of covalently bonded atoms ai , aj ∈ A0 be
3
upper-bounded by min{vi , vj } where vi = 4π
3 Ri is the vol1
ume of the atom ai , and 0 ≤ < 4 is a small number.
Since each atom makes at most 4 covalent bonds, the unpenetrated volume for the atom ai is lower-bounded by (1−4)vi ,
hence it is safe to assume that (1 − 4) > 0. Then the volume v(A0 ) occupied by the union of all the atoms in A0 is
4π
0
3
0
3
0
bounded as 4π
3 (1 − 4)|A |Rmin ≤ v(A ) ≤ 3 |A |Rmax . Con0
sequently, there exists an ‘average’ radius R̄(A ) bounded
1
as (1 − 4) 3 Rmin ≤ R̄(A0 ) ≤ Rmax , such that v(A0 ) =
4π
0
3
0
3 |A |R̄ (A ), where typically R̄ ∼ 1 Å.
Assumption 2 It is also reasonable to assume that if the
protein is either in an extended conformation aligned with
one of the Cartesian axes (which is the case near the ZP
conformation) or in a globular conformation (which is the
case for most water-soluble proteins at their folded conformation), the empty space inside the bounding box is not extremely larger than the space occupied by the protein atoms,
i.e., vBB (A)/v(A) = O(1). Supported by experimentation,
we assume this to be the case in the intermediate conformations as well, to simplify the analysis. However, there are
possible conformations (e.g., extended along a diagonal direction in the axis-aligned bounding box) that would violate
this assumption and result in slightly larger running times
than predicted here, in spite of the low probability.
Letting A0 := A (hence |A0 | = n) in Assumption 1, and
noting from the definition that vBB (A) = (αn)s3c , from As3
sumption 2 it follows that 3α
4π (sc /R̄) = O(1). Therefore, if
we choose the grid cell size sc ∼ 1 Å then α = O(1) and the
number of buckets will be dαne = O(n).
Energy and Force Computations. Once the pairs of
neighbors are identified, computing their electrostatic and
van der Waals forces can be done in O(1) time per pair, using the analytical truncated equations given in (18) and (19),
respectively. It is important to note that such interactions are
Table Construction. At each snapshot of the simulation, strictly pairwise, i.e., they depend on the relative positions
the algorithm scans through all the atoms with updated po- of pairs of atoms ai ∈ A and aj ∈ Aelec
or Avdw
, and the
i
i
sitions, and the deterministic hash function simply maps the presence of any third atom ak ∈ A (k 6= i, j) does not affect
atom center positions ri ∈ R3 that lie inside a grid cell the force exchanged between ai and aj . Therefore, the com10
putation algorithm is straightforward: it iterates over all the
atoms for 1 ≤ i ≤ n (sequentially or in parallel) and for each
atom, it computes Felec
(A0i ) and Fvdw
(A0i ), by sequentially
i
i
aggregating the contributions of the hashed neighbor atoms
aj ∈ A0i , using (18) and (19), respectively.
Unfortunately, this is not the case for solvation force computation using (23) or (24), which requires computing the
gradients of the atomic SASA with respect to the coordinates of the set of neighbor atoms. The SASA variations
in one atom ai ∈ A with respect to an infinitesimal change
in the position of another atom aj ∈ Acav
i , can be affected
by the presence of a third atom ak ∈ Acav
(k 6= i, j), thus
i
cannot be obtained in a pairwise fashion. This is because
the overlaps of the pairs of offset spheres are not mutually
disjoint. A segment of the offset surface can be overlapped
with more than one neighbor sphere simultaneously, thus displacing one of the overlapping spheres may or may not affect
the SASA. We return to this subject in Section 3.4 where a
surface sampling algorithm is proposed as a simple solution.
3.3
Bonds Tree/Graph
elec
vdw
To decide the weight factors wi,j
in (18) and wi,j
in (19),
one needs to quickly identify the types of interactions based
on the number of bonds between pairs of atoms as described
in Section 2.2. An n × n look-up table was used in Protofold
I [46–48] for all pairs of n atoms which required a preprocessing step with O(n2 ) time and space. This can be improved
by constructing a tree/graph data structure that stores the
combinatorial structure of the chain, in which the vertices are
atoms and edges are the covalent bonds between them. By
excluding a single edge from the loops associated with the
rare aromatic groups in certain side chains (e.g., imidazole
in His and indole in Trp), this graph can be converted to a
tree whose root is arbitrarily chosen as the N atom of the
amino-terminus. The interaction types are then identified by
the shortest path lengths between atoms.
The algorithm starts from the root and visits all vertices
using a standard tree traversal routine. For each vertex, it
stores a pointer to its parent and the index of the corresponding atom’s AA residue. During the force computation in each
KCM iteration, the residue indices for a pair of atoms of interest are checked. If the atoms are farther than a residue
apart (i.e., if AA indices are neither identical nor consecutive), the weights in (18) and (19) are simply set to 1 (i.e.,
1-4 interactions or beyond). Otherwise, the algorithm checks
1) if one atom is the parent of the other (i.e., 1-2 interaction);
2) if one atom is the grand parent or sibling of the other (i.e.,
1-3 interaction); or 3) if one atom is the great-grand parent
or sibling of parent of the other (1-4 interactions). This requires O(n) time and space for preprocessing and O(1) query
time during the KCM iterations.
3.4
Surface Enumeration
As mentioned in Section 1.1, several attempts have been
made to approximate the SASA and its derivative by a pair-
wise treatment of the overlaps, including the probabilistic
methods [63, 64, 66, 69], popular in many molecular simulation software such as CHARMM [62], GROMOS [65], and
AMBER [67,68]. In an early attempt to add solvation effects
to Protofold II, we used these pairwise approximate formulae, which made it possible to compute the solvation forces
with running times comparable to those of the electrostatic
and van der Waals force computations. However, a comparison with the exact method [61] showed that when the distribution of the atoms deviates from that assumed in the the
probabilistic methods, prohibitively large errors can be introduced into the resultant effects. The exact method [61] takes
O(|A0i |) operations for computing the SASA and its gradient
for ai ∈ A by using the coordinates of all neighbor atoms
⊆ A0i . This is asymptotically O(1) time per atom (since
Acav
i
we reasoned earlier that |A0i | = O(1) under Assumption 1),
but in practice it is not nearly as fast as using the pairwise
formulae. Alternatively, we use an approximate method that
relies on an enumeration of the surface area, in which the deviations from the exact results can be controlled to a desired
precision in a trade-off with computation time.
Offset Sphere Sampling. For a given atom ai ∈ A of
van der Waals radius Ri , an offset sphere of radius Rioff =
Ri + RH2 O concentric with the atom sphere is considered.
The atom’s SASA is obtained by measuring the area Aexp
i
of the portion of the offset surface that is not overlapped
by the offset sphere of any neighbor atom aj ∈ Acav
(hence
i
exposed to the solvent). To approximate the SASA, one can
generate a large but finite ‘quasi-uniform’ set of sample points
denoted as Qi (1 ≤ i ≤ n) on the surface of the offset sphere
of the atom ai ∈ A, by which we mean a sampling that allows
approximating the exposed fraction of the surface by the ratio
of the number of exposed sample points to the total number
of sample points. In other words, if we let
Qexp
= {q ∈ Qi | @aj ∈ A0i : kq − rj k2 ≤ Rjoff }
i
(32)
be the subset of the solvent-exposed sample points, i.e., the
points that are outside the offset spheres of all neighbors,
exp
off
then lim|Qi |→∞ |Qexp
i |/|Qi | = Ai /Ai . If we define the
exp
exp
‘exposure ratio’ as fi = |Qi |/|Qi |, the SASA can be apoff
off 2
proximated as Aexp
≈ fiexp Aoff
i where Ai = 4π(Ri ) , using
i
8
a large enough sample size |Qi | 1.
There are different ways to obtain a quasi-uniform deterministic sampling on a sphere with consistent incremental
quality [84]. For example, one could use a triangular spherical meshing algorithm, which starts from an icosahedron approximation of the sphere and recursively creates successive
triangular subdivisions projected back on the sphere. Alternatively, one could use a polar geodesic sampling algorithm,
8 An alternative approach is uniform random sampling, e.g., using
the simple method in [83]. Random sampling is easier to implement
in parallel since every sample point in Qi would be independent from
others, and results in Aexp
= [fiexp ]Aoff
where [fiexp ] is the expected
i
i
ratio of the exposed sample points in probabilistic terms. However, it
requires much larger sample sizes to approach the expectation and to
achieve adequate accuracy in practice.
11
which starts from a set of orbits with uniform angular distribution and samples a number of points uniformly on each
orbit proportional to the orbit’s circumference. We take the
latter approach whose details are presented in [2].
To improve the efficiency, one could always precompute the
coordinates for a single sampling Q on a unit sphere centered
at the origin, and map it into individual atoms with different offset sphere center positions ri and radii Rioff using the
mapping Qi = Ti (Q) where Ti (q) = ri + Rioff q for 1 ≤ i ≤ n
and q ∈ Q. This implies an equal number of sample points
off 2
N = |Q| for all the atoms, selected as N = 4π(Rmax
) /δA
off
where Rmax = Rmax + RH2 O is the maximum offset sphere
radius, and δA is the desired characteristic area element carried by each sample point. Hence the sampling takes O(nN )
operations for all the atoms regardless of the sampling technique. For implementation purposes, we assign an arbitrary
ordering to the sample points, letting Q = {q1 , q2 , · · · , qN }
and denoting transformed sample points as qi,k = Ti (qk ).
fjexp with respect to the positions of the atoms ai and aj ,
respectively:
∇rj fiexp ≈
exp
X fi,j,s
− fiexp
es ,
δr
s=1,2,3
(35)
where δr > 0 is the finite difference, es (s = 1, 2, 3) are
exp
the unit vectors along the 3 Cartesian axes, and fi,j,s
are the
exposure ratio of the atom ai ∈ A after changing the position
of the neighbor atom aj ∈ A0i from the current value rj to a
hypothetical variant rj + δres .
Enumeration Algorithm. In order to compute the exposure ratio and its finite-difference gradient, we use a binary enumeration function B : A × Q → {0, 1} (1 ≤ i ≤ n)
such that B(ai , qk ) = 1 if the sample point qi,k ∈ Ti (Q)
on the offset sphere of the atom ai ∈ A is overlapped by at
least one neighbor offset sphere (i.e., if ∃aj ∈ A0i such that
off
Energy and Force Approximations. Substituting for kTi (qk ) − rj k2 ≤ Rj ) and B(ai , qk ) = 0 if the sample point
exp
exp off
exp
off 2
Ai
≈ fi Ai = 4πfi (Ri ) into (20), the total sol- is exposed to the solvent. The algorithm iterates over all the
atoms for 1 ≤ i ≤ n and all the sample points for 1 ≤ k ≤ N
vation free energy can be computed directly from
(sequentially or in parallel). For each sample point, the inX
Gcav (A) ≈
4πγj fjexp (Rjoff )2 .
(33) dicator Bi,k := B(ai , qk ) is initialized to 0, and each point is
tested against the set of neighbors A0i , scanned sequentially.
aj ∈A
As soon as one overlapping neighbor is found, bi,k is set to 1
To obtain the solvation force on any atom ai ∈ A, the energy and there is no need to test the rest of the neighbors. The
must be differentiated with respect to the atom’s center co- exposure ratio is then computed as
ordinates ri ∈ R3 , giving rise to (23). It is very important
to note that an infinitesimal displacement of the atom ai can
N
X
X B(ai , qk )
Bi,k
change the SASA of ai itself, as well as that of the neighbor
=1−
.
(36)
fiexp = 1 −
|Q|
N
0
atoms aj ∈ Acav
⊆
A
.
However,
we
showed
in
Section
2.2
q
∈Q
k=1
k
i
i
that the two effects are geometrically dependent, yielding the
symmetric form in (24). From a computational perspective, In the worst case, this takes |A0i |N tests and N binary sums
per atom where N = |Q| is the sample size, which adds to
(24) is preferred over (24), because
O(N ) basic operations per atom (since we reasoned earlier
1. it eliminates the need for computing the gradient that |A0 | = O(1) under Assumption 1), and a total of O(nN )
i
exp
∇rj Ai for the cases when i = j, hence decreasing the time for all the atoms.
number of such computations from n2 to n(n − 1); and
For every sample point, the sequential inner loop of the alrepeated 3|A0i | times for computing the varia2. its symmetric form lends itself to a data-parallel imple- gorithmexpcan be
exp
exp
mentation that is balanced between computation and tions fi,j,1 , fi,j,2 , and fi,j,3 used in (35), after introducing the
finite difference to the 3 Cartesian coordinates (one at a time)
data sharing tasks, as we show in Section 4.
of each neighbor atom aj ∈ A0i . This takes 3|A0i |2 N more tests
This follows from the fact that for a given pair of indices per atom, still asymptotically O(N ) but not fast enough in
i 6= j, the first term in the formula for Fcav
is identical to practice. There is a notably more efficient way to do the latter
i
the second term in the formula for Fcav
(both
given
by (24)), computation by ruling out the subset of sample points that
j
exp
cutting the number of required SASA gradient computations cannot possibly contribute to fi,j,s
− fiexp (s = 1, 2, 3) in (35)
exp
to n(n − 1)/2. Substituting for Aexp
and
A
in
(24),
the
during the first iteration when computing Bi,k indicators. In
i
j
solvation forces can be approximated as
particular, if a sample point is overlapped by more than one
X
neighbor, displacing any neighbor does not affect its expo0
off 2
Fcav
∇rj fiexp
i (Ai ) ≈ 4πγi (Ri )
sure state (from overlapped to exposed or vice versa), hence
exp
aj ∈A0i
it does not contribute to fi,j,s
− fiexp . To leverage this propX
− 4π
γj (Rjoff )2 ∇ri fjexp ,
(34) erty, we expand the binary definition of the state function to
C : A × Q → Z ∩ [0, ∞) such that C(ai , qk ) counts the actual
aj ∈A0i
number of neighbors aj ∈ A0i that overlap the sample point
exp
exp
where ∇rj fi and ∇ri fj can be approximated using the qi,k ∈ Ti (Q). Three different states for a sample point are
forward-difference method from finite variations of fiexp and observed in terms of the changes in Ci,k := C(ai , qk ):
12
1. ‘Not overlapped’ or ‘exposed’ (Ci,k = 0). In this case,
displacing any neighbor either keeps the state at Ci,k = 0
or changes it to Ci,k = 1, where the latter case affects
the contribution to SASA. Hence the inner loop needs
to be repeated for all neighbors (i.e., for 3|A0i | times).
Algorithm 1: SASA enumeration algorithm for solvation
free energy and force computation.
Input: ri , Rioff , γi , Qi , and A0i for all ai ∈ A (1 ≤ i ≤ n);
Output: Gcav
and Fcav
for all ai ∈ A (1 ≤ i ≤ n);
i
i
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n (seq. or in k) do
Step 1: Energy Computation:
initialize fiexp ← 1;
off 2
initialize Gcav
← Gcav
i
i,0 ← 4πγi (Ri ) ;
for 1 ≤ k ≤ |Qi | (seq. or in k) do
over
initialize Ci,k ← 0; ji,k
← −1;
for j = indices of atoms in A0i (seq.) do
if kqi,k − rj k2 ≤ Rjoff then
increment Ci,k ← Ci,k + 1;
if Ci,k = 1 then
//Save critical neighbor index:
over
write ji,k
← j;
atomic read+modify+write
fiexp ← fiexp − 1/|Qi |;
Gcav
← Gcav
− Gcav
i
i
i,0 /|Qi |;
else
if Ci,k ≥ 2 then
over
← −1;
write ji,k
break;
Step 2: Force Computation:
exp
exp
exp
initialize fi,1
← fi,2
← fi,3
← fiexp ;
cav
cav
cav
initialize Fi,1 ← Fi,2 ← Fi,3 ← 0;
Synchronize for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n;
for 1 ≤ k ≤ |Qi | (seq. or in k) do
for 1 ≤ s ≤ 3 (seq. or in k) do
if Ci,k = 0 then
for j = indices of atoms in A0i (seq.) do
if kqi,k − (rj + δres )k2 ≤ Rjoff then
atomic read+modify+write
exp
exp
fi,j,s
← fi,j,s
− 1/|Qi |;
cav
cav
Fi,s ← Fi,s − Gcav
i,0 /(|Qi |δr);
cav
cav
†
Fj,s
← Fi,s
+ Gcav
i,0 /(|Qi |δr);
break;
else
if Ci,k = 1 then
over
over
write j ← ji,k
; //note: ji,k
6= −1
if kqi,k − (rj + δres )k2 > Rjoff then
atomic read+modify+write
exp
exp
fi,j,s
← fi,j,s
+ 1/|Qi |;
cav
cav
Fi,s ← Fi,s
+ Gcav
i,0 /(|Qi |δr);
cav
cav
†
Fj,s ← Fi,s − Gcav
i,0 /(|Qi |δr);
break;
cav
cav
cav
write Fcav
← (Fi,1
, Fi,2
, Fi,3
);
i
//† The instructions that require architecture-specific mutex.
2. ‘Critically overlapped’ (Ci,k = 1). In this case, the only
neighbor whose displacement may change the sample
point’s state to Ci,k = 0 is the one that originally overlapped it, and displacing any other neighbor either keeps
the state at Ci,k = 1 or changes it to Ci,k = 2, both of
which correspond to overlapped states that does not affect the contribution to SASA. Hence the inner loop is
repeated only 3 times after displacing that critical neighbor along the 3 Cartesian axes.
3. ‘Multiply overlapped’ (Ci,k ≥ 2). In this case, displacing any neighbor either keeps the state at Ci,k ≥ 2 or
changes it to Ci,k = 1, both of which correspond to overlapped states that does not affect the contribution to
SASA. Hence the inner loop need not be repeated at all.
Therefore, the only changes that contribute a nonzero value
exp
to fi,j,s
− fiexp (s = 1, 2, 3) are those from exposed (Ci,k = 0)
to critically overlapped (Ci,k = 1) and vice versa, thus a significant amount of computation time can be saved by early
detection of the rest. An atom aj ∈ A0i is called a ‘critical neighbor’ of the atom ai ∈ A with respect to a sample
point qi,k ∈ Qi along a particular direction es (s = 1, 2, 3),
if a finite displacement δres results in such a change. As
a direct consequence of geometry, if aj is a critical neighbor of ai along +es , then ai is also a critical neighbor of
aj along −es , both with respect to the same sample point.
Therefore, a pair of neighbor atoms ai , aj ∈ A exchange a
solvation force ±δFcav = ±4πγi (Rioff )2 /(N δr)es due to their
overlap at the sample point qi,k if and only if they are critical neighbors with respect to es . The improved algorithm
(based on the integer-valued Ci,k ) is different from the original (based on the binary-valued Bi,k ) in that the first iteration of the sequential inner loop for computing Ci,k terminates after the second (rather than the first) overlap is encountered, because all Ci,k ≥ 2 have equivalent implications
according to the above rules.9 During this step, the value of
fiexp is initialized to 1 for each atom, and every time a sample
point with Ci,k = 1 or 2 is discovered, fiexp is decremented
by 1/N . The next 3 repetitions of the inner loop per neighbor atom displacement depend on the aforementioned rules
based on the value of Ci,k . The 3 variants of the exposure
exp
ratio fi,j,s
(s = 1, 2, 3) are initialized to fiexp for each atom
with respect to displacements in all of its neighbors. Every
time a sample point with Ci,k = 0 or 1 is encountered, the
inner loop is repeated with displaced neighbor coordinates to
exp
discover the critical neighbors, each adding ±1/N to fi,j,s
.
Significant speed-ups are achieved in terms of the average
time, a rigorous analysis of which is not possible without
9 Hence one could redefine to C : A × Q → {0, 1, “2 or more”} to
implement the same trick with only 3 distinct flags, as in Algorithm 1.
13
assumptions on the spatial distribution of atoms. However,
the worst case time complexity is still O(nN ) for the sequential algorithm. One could easily parallelize the algorithm
at the outer loops over the atoms and sample points, while
the inner loops over the neighbor atoms is best implemented
sequentially. On a simple concurrent-read concurrent-write
(CRCW) parallel random-access machine (PRAM) with common conflict resolution (briefly introduced in Appendix C.1),
the parallel running time of O(nN/P ) can be achieved in theory using P processors (i.e., linear speed-up), which leads to
O(n) if we have P = O(N ) processors at our disposal—not
far from reality when using GPUs. However, there are more
complications to the machine architecture in practice, as will
be addressed in Section 4.
The complete process is described in pseudo-code in Algorithm 1. The instructions marked by a dagger († ) modify
variables that belong to different atoms iterated in parallel
by the outer-most loop, hence require a mutex with nuances
that depend on the architecture as described in Section 4.
3.5
Prefix Sum Calls
Figure 5: The main process flowchart of Protofold II
There are multiple references in Protofold II to the generic
prefix sum routine—explained in Appendix B, which can be
where [η] is an l × l upper-triangular matrix made of the
performed using optimal sequential and parallel algorithms
torque contributions ηk,h , whose hth column’s upper nonzero
in linear number of steps—that emerge naturally as a conseelements form the h × 1 column matrix [ηh ] introduced in
quence of the linear topology of the polypeptide backbone:
(27). Note that each link only affects the preceding joints
1. Computing the link transformations from the successive in the chain, hence ηk,h = 0 for all h ≤ k − 1. The total
matrix multiplications in (7) and (8), in which the do- torque joints τk (1 ≤ k ≤ l) can be obtained as a summation
main is Σ := SO(3) (represented by 3 × 3 rotation ma- over the rows of the above matrix via (29). In Protofold I
trices) and the operator ⊕ is the matrix multiplication. [46–48] this was accomplished by scanning through the terms
along the columns in (37), which took l(l + 1)/2 = O(l2 )
2. Computing the atom center coordinates from the suc- operations. In Protofold II we perform row scanning of the
cessive vector summations in (9) and (10), in which the matrix, starting from the bottom row and moving upwards.
domain is Σ := R3 (represented by 3 × 1 column matri- More specifically, by factoring out the Jacobian terms [JT ] in
k
ces) and the operator ⊕ is the vector summation.
each row of (37) and aggregating the generalized forces into
Pl
agg
yields τk = [Jk ]T [Pagg
k ] as the sum
3. Computing the joint torques from the successive super- [Pk ] = h=k [Ph ], (29)
agg
of
each
row.
Then
[P
]
can
be
obtained
in
O(1)
time from
k
position of the contributions of each link on the precedagg
agg
agg
[P
]
as
[P
]
=
[P
]
+
[P
],
which
leads
to
a total of
k
k+1
k
k+1
ing joints in the chain using (27) and (29), in which the
6
O(l)
prefix
computation
steps.
domain is Σ := R (represented by 6 × 1 column matrices) and the operator ⊕ is the inner product.
The first item clearly takes O(n) steps, while the latter two
take O(l) = O(m) steps (which is also O(n)). To explain the
last item further, let [Jk ] be the k th column of the Jacobian
T
matrix [J] and [Ph ] := [Tlink
Flink
be the so-called genh
h ]
eralized force on the right-hand side of (27) on the hth link
along the chain, both of which are 6 × 1 column matrices.
The contribution of Ph on the k th joint is obtained as the
inner product of the two matrices ηk,h = [Jk ]T [Ph ] arranged
into the following matrix:
T
J1 P 1 JT
JT
1 P2 · · ·
1 Pl
0
JT
JT
2 P2 · · ·
2 Pl
[η] =
(37)
,
..
..
.
.
..
..
.
.
0
0
· · · JT
l Pl
14
4
Implementation
Figure 5 is a schematic of the Protofold II architecture elaborated in Section 4.1. The remainder of this section is dedicated to the parallel implementation of Algorithm 1 on the
CPU in Section 4.2 and on the GPU in Section 4.3, which
are identified by the alternative shaded modules in Fig. 5.
4.1
Protofold II Architecture
Unlike Protofold I [46–48] that was programmed in Matlabr ,
Protofold II is reprogrammed with a new architecture in C++.
The CPU- and GPU-parallel algorithms are implemented as
external modules and linked to the main application thread
as dynamic link libraries (DLL), which can be integrated into
other folding packages.
As depicted in Fig. 5, a typical KCM simulation in Protofold II can be summarized into the following steps:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
with experimental observations except in the case of relatively short chains; e.g., folding simulation of α−helix coiling
described in section 5.1. This is due to a variety of reasons ranging from the sensitivity of the folding pathway to
the physical parameters (e.g., adjusted coefficients in the emInput: The user specifies a primary structure (i.e., AA pirical force-field equations) to the sensitivity of the spatial
sequence information) to the interface.
structure of long chains to simplifying geometric assumptions
Preprocessing: The program constructs the AA chain (e.g., the exact planarity of the peptide planes).
using the structural assumptions given in Section 2.1 to
arrange the atoms into the consecutive peptide planes. Additional Functionalities. In order to enable addressThe double-bond angles are all set to the fixed values of ing certain computer-aided structural studies on real proteins
ωi = 0◦ (cis) or −180◦ (trans) and the body vectors are effectively in spite of the aforementioned difficulties, we found
it imperative to include the following additional functionaliassigned with the values given in Table 1.
ties in Protofold II:
Initialization: The main chain dihedral angles are ini• The user has the option to 1) specify only sequence data,
tialized as φ0i = ψi0 = −180◦ and the side chain dihedral
from which the ‘canonical’ peptide plane geometry (i.e.,
angles are initialized to rotameric default values χ0i,k [45]
0
◦
assuming exact planarity ωi = 0◦ (cis) or −180◦ (trans)
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, 1 ≤ k ≤ li ≤ 4—i.e., set all θj,k = 0 in
and average lengths in Table 2); or 2) import the protein
(1) through (3) referred to as ZP initial conditions.
structure as a PDB file and retain the peptide group
Forward Kinematics: The conformation variables
geometry as-read when constructing the rigid links.
summarized in Table 2 are converted to the Cartesian co• The user has the option to limit the mobility of the linkordinates of the individual atoms by using the sequence
age by fixing as many dihedral angles as desired. This
of rigid body transformations described in Section 2.1.
enables folding studies at multiple levels and different
Coordinate Hashing: Using the 3D grid data strucscales. For example, it is possible to group collections
ture presented in Section 3.2, the atom coordinates
of AAs (e.g., secondary elements, motifs, domains, etc.)
are arranged into buckets for fast neighborhood queries
into presumed rigid bodies and limit the DOF to deforbased on the cut-off distances.
mations at the loops connecting them.
6. Force Computations: The free energy- and forcefields are computed from the atom coordinates using the
equations given in Section 2.2. This is where the CPUor GPU-parallel modules are called for computing the
solvation effects.
7. Torque Computations: The forces on the atoms are
converted to joint torques using the Jacobian transformation described in Section 2.2.
8. KCM Stepping: The kinetostatic effect of the joint
torques are computed using the simple steepest-descent
stepping explained in Section 2.3.
• In addition to the ZP initial conditions, the user may
choose to use other initial conditions, including but not
limited to completely random initial conditions or the
native conformation perturbed by arbitrary (deterministic or randomized) changes to certain dihedral angles.
• When importing PDB files, the program eliminates water molecules—since their effect is implicitly incorporated by the solvation energies—but retains other heteroatoms (e.g., metal ions, co-factors, substrates, etc.)
and includes them among chain atoms when computing
the force-field. This is crucial since the proper folding of
many proteins is dependent on these agents.
9. Termination: If the convergence criteria is met, the
program terminates; otherwise it repeats the steps 4 In addition to the above features, the following need to be
included in future versions:
through 8 above.
10. Output: The intermediate (every several frames) and
final conformations in PDB format, the variations of the
dihedral angles and free energy terms, and the performance measures (e.g., running times of different steps)
are exported by the program.
These steps characterize the process of arriving from sequence
configuration (i.e., primary structure) to stable 3D conformation (i.e., tertiary structure) without any additional assumptions. Although this is the ultimate goal of protein folding,
it is rather ambitious to obtain results that are consistent
15
• The program currently supports monomeric protein folding in its simplest topology. It is desirable to enable multimeric protein folding by maintaining multiple chains
bound together (i.e., quaternary structure) and more
complex topologies induced by other effects (e.g., disulfide bonds, hydrogen bonds, lipidation, etc.)
• the simplistic steepest-descent search process presented
in Section 2.3 has not evolved much since Protofold I
[46–48]. Our numerical experiments suggest that better
optimization algorithms such as a hybrid Monte Carlo
Figure 6: Thread execution model on the CPU.
sampling combined with steepest-descent or conjugategradients KCM10 could be more effective in avoiding local minima and enable faster convergence to the global
minimum.
The neighborhood information (i.e., the list of indices of
all aj ∈ Ai defined in (31) for each atom ai ∈ A) is constructed and saved in the global memory shared among all
processors, hence can be accessed concurrently from different
threads. Each thread stores the sample point coordinates,
the SASA and its gradient, and the resulting solvation energy
and force components in the local memory of the processor.
The thread iterates sequentially over the sample points on the
offset sphere, and a counter variable that keeps track of the
number of overlapped sample points is initialized within the
scope of the thread. For each sample point, the coordinates
are computed and tested sequentially against all neighbors to
obtain Ci,k (1 ≤ i ≤ n, 1 ≤ k ≤ |Qi |).
Once the exposure states are obtained for the original configuration of the neighbors, the thread loops over all neighbors one more time to examine the effects of their displacement along the 3 coordinate axes one at a time. If the criteria given in Section 3.4 are met, the pair of force components
±δF cav = ±4πγi (Rioff )2 /(N δr) need to be added to the total
solvation forces of two neighbor atoms ai and aj along the
proper coordinate axis, and in opposite directions. This results in two write operations per incidence, the first of which
modifies Fcav
of ai , which is safely assigned to the current
i
thread and occurs in the local memory without any concern
related to communication between the threads. The second
write operation, on the other hand, modifies Fcav
of aj , a
j
variable assigned to a different thread. This requires communication between the two threads, and has to be implemented using atomic write operations into the global memory to guarantee mutual exclusion. Figure 6 shows the multithreading scheme for the CPU-parallel algorithm. The algorithm is implemented using the OpenMP library. Although
linear speed-up is expected in theory on an abstract CRCW
PRAM, the actual speed-up is sublinear (as depicted in Section 5.2) in practice due to bus traffic, network contention,
cache invalidations, and serialized operations.
Parallel Implementations. As demonstrated in Section
3.4, the solvation energy and force computations using (24)
and Algorithm 1 are the most time-consuming steps of each
KCM iteration, mainly due to the large number of sample
points |Q| = N 1 required to enumerate the offset sphere
of each atom for an adequate approximation of SASA and its
gradient. To benefit from the single-instruction multiple-data
(SIMD) characteristic of Algorithm 1, the variables pertaining to different atoms are assigned to different processors.
The two terms on the right-hand side of (24) are computed
concurrently by different processors assigned to ai , aj ∈ A
and broadcasted to each other to minimize the computational
work. An immediate consequence is an additional communication overhead and possible network contention due to
concurrent write attempts. Such a trade-off between computation and communication intensities is a common characteristic of parallel algorithms [85], and will be considered here
for code optimization.
CPU Optimization. The number of CPU cores is generHere we focus on the implementation of the SIMD Algo- ally much smaller that the number of atoms (p n). Neverrithm 1 using two parallel computing models; namely,
theless, it is good practice to generate more threads than the
number of cores to maximize the performance by keeping the
• one that is designed for coarse-grained multiprocesser processors saturated at all times with computational work.
machines such as multi-core CPUs (Section 4.2); and
Accessing global memory incurs latency at the incidence of
• another that is designed for fine-grained multiprocesser a cache miss and multithreading is a standard technique for
hiding such latencies. The computation instructions are inmachines such as many-core GPUs (Section 4.3).
terleaved with memory access instructions, hence every time
one thread is accessing the global memory the processor can
switch the context to a different thread. Other optimization
4.2 CPU-Parallel Implementation
attempts include using local memories instead of global memThe first parallel implementation targets a coarse-grained ories whenever possible, and avoiding multiple computations
shared-memory multiprocessor machine, i.e., one with a of constant parameters or variables that are used repeatedly.
multi-core multi-thread CPU. Given n atoms n threads are
generated, assigning one thread per atom ai (1 ≤ i ≤ n).
4.3
10 This
module is already implemented into Protofold II but not tested
yet, as the focus of this article is on the improved model and implementation of the force-field.
GPU-Parallel Implementation
The second parallel implementation targets a fine-grained
machine with a hierarchical memory architecture, i.e., one
16
control optimization.
• Memory optimization is the most effective of all, as
demonstrated by the results in the Section 5.2. In contrast to the CPU-parallel algorithm that makes most
references through the cached global memory, the GPUparallel algorithm transfers the coordinates, radii, solvation parameters, and neighbor index lists for each
atom into the shared memory to minimize the number
of global memory references. The variables that are exclusive to the threads, on the other hand, such as the exposure states or sample coordinates are allocated in the
registers. However, the limited amount of shared memory and register resources on the streaming multiprocessor (SM) imposes a restriction on the number of resident
blocks on the SM and can adversely affect thread occupancy at any time during the simulation. Therefore, one
needs to avoid excessive variable definitions within the
scope of the GPU kernels.
Figure 7: Thread execution model on the GPU.
with a many-core many-thread GPU. Given n atoms, a linear grid of n blocks is generated, assigning one block per
atom ai (1 ≤ i ≤ n). Each block is further divided into
N = |Q| threads, assigning one thread per sample point
qk ∈ Q (1 ≤ q ≤ n) on the unit offset sphere. Prior to
GPU kernel execution, the neighborhood information (i.e.,
the list of indices of all aj ∈ Ai defined in (31) for each atom
ai ∈ A) is transferred from the CPU (i.e., host) memory to
the GPU (i.e., device) memory. For each thread, the iteration
over different neighbors is performed sequentially, similar to
the CPU-parallel code presented in 4.2. The solvation energy and force components, a counter that keeps track of the
number of overlapped sample points, and exposure states are
initialized in the shared memory of the blocks, which require
atomic operations for access safety by multiple threads, while
sample point coordinates are stored in the registers that are
local to each thread. Each sample point is tested sequentially
against all neighbors to obtain Ci,k (1 ≤ i ≤ n, 1 ≤ k ≤ |Qi |).
Once the exposure states are obtained for the original configuration of the neighbors, the thread loops over all neighbors one more time to examine the effect of their displacement along the 3 coordinate axes one at a time. Similar to
the CPU-based implementation, whenever the pair of force
components ±δF cav = ±4πγi (Rioff )2 /(N δr) need to be added
to the total solvation forces of two neighbor atoms ai and
aj along the proper coordinate axis, the write operation that
modifies Fcav
of ai happens atomically in the shared memory.
i
This ensures mutual exclusion between threads of the same
block. On the other hand, the write operation that modifies
Fcav
of aj happens atomically in the global memory to enj
sure mutual exclusion between blocks of the same grid. Figure 7 shows the multi-threading scheme for the GPU-parallel
algorithm. The algorithm is implemented using NVIDIA’s
compute-unified device architecture (CUDA). Kernel invocation is carried out synchronously within the default CUDA
stream, hence synchronization between blocks is automatically guaranteed, while barrier synchronization is needed between threads of the same block.
• For execution level optimization, the kernels should be
executed with proper granularity to maximize SM thread
occupancy. Specifying a larger number of threads per
block generally contributes to latency hiding, but is limited by the architecture as well as the on-chip memory
resources. The number of threads is the same as the sample size N = |Q| a proper choice of which is a trade-off
between accuracy and performance.
• For instruction level optimization, the transcendental
math functions are converted to their intrinsic alternatives that are executed on the special function units
(SFU) of the CUDA cores.
• Flow-control optimization is realized by avoiding multiple execution paths within the same block, which might
lead to thread divergence and serialization within the
same warp. In particular, when checking for overlaps
between neighbor atoms and sample points, the conditional (e.g., if/else/then) statements are set in such a
way that one of the two execution paths is always null.
The near-optimal conditions are reached by successive experimentation and modification of the code. For more information regarding the GPU architecture and terminology, see
Appendix C.2.
5
Results & Discussion
This section presents a preliminary assessment of the model
and implementation enhancements from Protofold I [46–48]
to Protofold II. The folding process is simulated and assessed
at multiple levels, ranging from the formation of secondary
structural elements (e.g., α−helix coiling or β−strands formation) from an open chain to tertiary interactions between
GPU Optimization. The optimization attempts can be secondary elements or across larger domains that can be ascategorized as memory, execution, instruction, and flow- sumed to be rigid in real protein examples.
17
Figure 8: Left-handed α−helix formation for a 15-residue polyalanine chain in vacuum (left) and in water (right) starting
from φ0i = ψi0 = +10◦ using Protofold II. Initial conditions and solvation effects dramatically affect the folding pathway.
Figure 9: Right-handed α−helix formation for a 15-residue polyalanine chain in vacuum (left) and in water (right) starting
from φ0i = ψi0 = −10◦ using Protofold II. Initial conditions and solvation effects dramatically affect the folding pathway.
In Section 5.1 we discuss the impact of introducing solvation effects on the folding process of secondary structural elements starting from different initial conditions. We present
some performance measures in Section 5.2 to validate the
practical benefits of algorithmic improvements (e.g., coordinate hashing) as well as implementation improvements (i.e.,
CPU- and GPU-parallel computing). Finally, we look at a
few real protein molecules in Section 5.3 and examine the energy variations in the neighborhood of the native structures.
5.1
The Folding Process
The simplest structural elements that are ubiquitous across
many protein domains are α−helices and β−strands. Here
we start by considering simple test runs on relatively short
(e.g., 10-20 residues long) peptide chains made of Ala residues
(typically used as the benchmark AA type in its most common L-stereoisomeric form) to visualize their compliance into
secondary structural elements.
Alpha Helix Formation. First, we run four tests on a 15residue chain starting from two different initial conditions, for
both of which we simulate the folding process without and
with solvation effects taken into account:
2. Starting from the (slightly pre-coiled) initial conditions
φ0i = ψi0 = −10◦ for all 1 ≤ i ≤ 15 the chain folds into a
right-handed α−helix as depicted in Fig. 9. The energy
variation during KCM iterations is given in Fig. 11.
The folding process in vacuum, i.e., without considering the
solvation effects, emulates the behavior in the absence of the
polar solvent, e.g., in membrane proteins extended along the
nonpolar lipid bilayer or in secondary structural elements
wrapped inside the hydrophobic core of globular proteins [3].
On the other hand, the folding process in water, i.e., with
the presence of the solvation effects in addition to the intramolecular interactions, emulates the formation of elements
that reside at the hydrophilic surface of globular proteins [3].
In the case of α−helix formations in Figs. 8 and 9, the hand
of the initial coil determines the hand of the final helix.11
This is due to the gradient descent nature of the KCM search
algorithm that tends to converge to different local minima
depending on the initial state. The effects of the solvation
are hard to observe in these examples with the energetically
unchallenged helical structures due to proper stacking of the
atoms favored by all considered effects. In both cases the van
der Waals and solvation effects work in the same direction
until the steric clash prevents the helix to coil further.
Figures 10 and 11 are plots of the free energy variations ver-
1. Starting from the (slightly pre-coiled) initial conditions
φ0i = ψi0 = +10◦ for all 1 ≤ i ≤ 15 the chain folds into
11 The surface visualizations can be deceiving where the right-handed
a left-handed α−helix as depicted in Fig. 8. The energy helix appears to have a left-handed twist and vice versa. This is due to
variation during KCM iterations is given in Fig. 10.
the transversal ridges and grooves formed in between the side chains [3].
18
Figure 10: Free energy variations during folding of a 15- Figure 11: Free energy variations during folding of a 15residue polyalanine chain into a left-handed α−helix in vac- residue polyalanine chain into a right-handed α−helix in vacuum (top) and in water (bottom) using Protofold II.
uum (top) and in water (bottom) using Protofold II.
sus KCM iteration number for the four runs described above.
Note that in all four cases (top and bottom plots) the solvation energy is evaluated and plotted, but only in two of them
(bottom plots) its effects are applied to deform the chain.
For both left and right-handed helix formation, the inclusion
of solvation effects clearly changes the folding pathway and
increases the number of iterations before convergence from
around 150 to 300. However, in either case the solvation free
energy changes are not as significant as those of intramolecular (particularly van der Waals) effects. Another important
observation is that the right-handed α−helix exhibits a notably more stable conformation than the left-handed α−helix
with about ∼ 40−50 kcal per mol lower total free energy
state—to be accurate, 43.8 and 45.9 kcal per mol for the
entire chain, i.e., 2.9 and 3.1 kcal per mol per AA residue,
without and with solvation effects, respectively. Although
this is qualitatively consistent with the expectation of righthanded coiling being favored by L-alanine chains, the energy
differences are higher than the ones reported in earlier studies
(e.g., MD results in [86]). However, a meaningful comparison
would require using identical simulation parameters, which is
beyond the scope of this paper.
The final dihedral angles for all 15 Ala residues corresponding to the folded (i.e., stable) conformations, obtained after
a large enough number of iterations, are given in Table 4.
ometric relations between consecutive peptide planes that,
when repeated for a segment of multiple residues along the
chain, create secondary structural elements such as coiled
α−helices and flat β−strands. Although the solvation effects
do not significantly alter the shape of the energy profile, there
is a certain amount of noise added due to the discrete nature
of the enumeration algorithm presented in Section 3.4.
To observe the effects of solvation, one needs to carry out
more extensive simulations on larger data sets with different chain lengths and various initial conditions. We carried
out KCM runs on 2,000 independent polyalanine chains of
random lengths in the range 10 ≤ m ≤ 20 starting from random initial angles in the range −90◦ ≤ φ0i , ψi0 ≤ +90◦ . The
tests were run separately without and with considering the
solvation effects using the same random seed. The resulting dihedral angles for all 27,717 Ala residues of all chains12
are plotted in Fig. 13. One can observe multiple concentration areas that clearly correspond to left- and right-handed
α−helices and flat β−strands, the former two helical folds being more populated on the plots. Zooming further on the two
α−regions reveals multiple local minima where the points are
concentrated more, which correspond to different subtypes of
α−helices. Comparing the two plots in Fig. 13 reveals that
the solvation effects do not significantly change the locations
of the local minima. However, the energy profile is relaxed
Ramachandran Plots. To examine the local effects of en- around the local minima where it has sharp cracks traced by
ergetics, Ramachandran plots (for a pair of Ala residues in the concentrated points along the valleys of the intramolectandem) are generated by Protofold II using the energy-field ular energy landscape.
presented in Section 2.2. The plots in Fig. 12 show the energy variations across different pairs (φ, ψ) of dihedral angles,
without and with considering the solvation effects. The vertical high-energy regions in the middle corresponds to pro12 The angles for the first AA residue of all chains are eliminated
hibitive steric clashes between the atoms. The low-energy as outliers since they differ dramatically from those of the subsequent
regions around it, on the other hand, correspond to the ge- residues due to the anchoring at the N-terminus (see Table 4).
19
Figure 12: The Ramachandran plots for the energy variations of a pair of Ala residues in vacuum (i.e., without solvation
effects) (left) and in water (i.e., with solvation effects) (right) using Protofold II.
Figure 13: The Ramachandran plots for the folded backbone conformation of 2,000 10- to 20-residue polyalanine chains in
vacuum (i.e., without solvation effects) (top) and in water (i.e., with solvation effects) (bottom) starting from random initial
conditions −90◦ ≤ φ0i , ψi0 ≤ +90◦ using Protofold II.
20
Table 4: Final conformations of a 15-residue polyalanine
chain folded in vacuum using Protofold II.
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Ave.
5.2
Left-handed coil
In vacuum
φi (◦ )
ψi (◦ )
+10.0 +118
+60.2 +53.9
+58.9 +36.8
+56.8 +45.4
+57.9 +42.2
+56.7 +43.7
+57.3 +42.7
+56.8 +44.0
+56.8 +42.3
+56.5 +45.5
+56.2 +42.4
+55.1 +48.4
+53.5 +45.5
+49.2 +59.4
+53.2 +69.8
+53.0 +52.0
φ0i = ψi0 = +10◦
In water
φi (◦ )
ψi (◦ )
−7.20
+21.5
+59.9
+47.6
+58.6
+40.0
+57.9
+45.1
+58.8
+40.3
+57.8
+43.6
+57.9
+43.6
+58.1
+41.6
+58.3
+42.1
+58.4
+43.3
+57.9
+41.7
+56.3
+46.0
+55.6
+45.0
+52.3
+52.6
+53.2
+72.7
+52.9
+44.4
Right-handed coil φ0i = ψi0 = −10◦
In vacuum
In water
φi ( ◦ )
ψi (◦ )
φi (◦ )
ψi (◦ )
−10.0 −59.1 +15.1
+54.4
−82.4 −41.1 −107
−47.1
−76.9 −24.8 −91.9
+11.3
−75.7 −34.4 −81.1
−34.4
−75.8 −28.4 −83.1
−23.8
−75.3 −31.3 −76.7
−32.1
−76.1 −29.3 −79.4
−28.9
−75.6 −30.5 −77.1
−28.9
−76.3 −29.2 −79.8
−29.2
−76.5 −29.7 −78.4
−28.3
−77.5 −29.5 −79.4
−28.6
−75.6 −33.5 −78.9
−28.7
−72.1 −39.0 −75.0
−33.4
−63.1 −44.4 −72.6
−40.0
−64.3 −53.5 −65.4
−48.0
−70.2 −35.9 −74.1
−24.4
Figure 14: The effect of 3D hashing on the force computation times of a 60-residue polyalanine chain with and without
solvation effects (on C-1).
Computation Times
Next, we demonstrate the substantial performance improvements in Protofold II as a result of introducing the algorithms
and data structures presented in Section 3. The running
times are reported and compared on two computer systems,
namely:
• C-1: Dell Precision T7500 workstation with an Intelr
Xeonr E5645 CPU (12 cores, clock rate 2.40 GHz, and Figure 15: Sequential running times for electrostatic, van der
host memory 24 GB). The system is equipped with one Waals, and solvation forces, and CPU-parallel running times
NVIDIA Quadror 4000 GPU (256 CUDA cores with of the latter for a 1,200-residue polypeptide chain (on C-1).
compute capability (CC) 2.0 and device memory 2 GB).
• C-2: Dell Precision T7600 workstation with an Intelr
Xeonr E5-2687W CPU (32 cores, clock rate 3.10 GHz,
and host memory 64 GB). The system is equipped with
two graphics cards: a NVIDIA Quadror K5000 GPU
(1,536 CUDA cores with CC 3.0 and device memory 4
GB) and a NVIDIA Teslar K20C GPU (2,496 CUDA
cores with CC 3.5 and device memory 5 GB).
Effect of Hashing. Figure 14 shows the running times of
the force computation step (on C-1) in a single KCM iteration for folding polyalanine chains of different lengths with
and without 3D hashing presented in Seciton 3.2 both in vacuum (i.e., without considering solvation effects) and in water
(i.e., with considering solvation effects). In both cases, the
results show a significant reduction in the running times with
hashing (e.g., up to 4.6× in vacuum and 1.5× in water for
m = 60 Ala residues), and the difference scales with the size
of the molecule. Nevertheless, the solvation force computations remain the bottleneck of the simulation (using sequential CPU implementation) and adversely affect the speed-up
gained from hashing.
Parallel Computing. The first 3 columns on the left in
Fig. 15 show the sequential CPU running times (on C-1)
for the electrostatic, van der Waals, and nonpolar solvation
forces in a single KCM iteration. The results were obtained
for a polypeptide chain composed of 1, 200 residues that are
randomly selected from Ala, Cys, and Ser AAs—the latter
two being equivalent to replacing the H in the nonpolar Ala
side chain with SH and OH, respectively, resulting in polar
side chains. It is clearly observed that with a single CPU
core, the first two terms take a very small fraction of the total
time (around 5−6% of the total force computation time per
iteration) and the solvent effects are clearly the bottleneck.
The same column chart in Fig. 15 also shows the running times and corresponding speed-ups (on C-1) for the
CPU-parallel computation of the solvation force using up to
12 CPU cores. An almost linear speed-up is achieved by increasing the number of processors (e.g., ∼ 10× with 12 cores).
However, the solvation force calculation is still about an order
of magnitude slower than that of the other two force types.
Figure 16 compares the running times and corresponding
speed-ups (on C-1) of the CPU- and GPU-parallel implementations for polypeptides of different lengths, ranging from
m = 200 (i.e., ∼ 2K atoms) to 1, 200 AAs (i.e., ∼ 13K atoms).
To depict the importance of memory optimization presented
in Section 4.3, the running times are shown for two different
cases; namely, one that uses global memory for communications between all threads of all blocks, and the optimized code
making extensive use of shared memories for communications
21
Figure 16: CPU- and GPU-parallel running times (top) and Figure 17: CPU- and GPU-parallel running times (top) and
speed-ups (bottom) with and without memory optimization speed-ups (bottom) with memory optimization on two GPUs
for polypeptide chains of various lengths (on C-1).
for polypeptide chains of various lengths (on C-2).
between threads within the same block. It is interesting to
note that when the GPU shared memory is not utilized, the
results do not show an improvement over the 12-core CPU
implementation due to large global memory access latencies.
However, proper shared memory usage results in a huge performance improvement that scales by protein size, e.g., from
20× for m = 200 AAs to 70× for m = 1, 200 AAs with respect
to the sequential run on a single CPU.
The computations are repeated for even larger molecules
in Fig. 17, ranging from m = 1, 000 AAs (i.e., ∼ 10K atoms)
to 6, 000 AAs (i.e., ∼ 64K atoms), enabled by leveraging a
more powerful machine (i.e., C-2). For the case of m =
1, 000 AAs, C-2 yields a two-fold speed-up on the CPU and
a three-fold speed-up on the GPU compared to C-1. As
depicted in Fig. 17, significantly higher and more consistent
CPU speed-ups of 16-18× and GPU speed-ups of 90-100×
(for Quadror K5000) and 270-290× (for Teslar K20C) are
observed. These observations imply proper scalability of the
data-parallel implementation with molecular size.
Even for molecules with tens of thousands of atoms, each
force-field computation takes only a fraction of a second per
iteration. This enables fast KCM simulation of folding for
large proteins over extended periods of time via Protofold II,
which wouldn’t be tractable via Protofold I [46–48].
Table 5: The size of the analyzed protein examples.
Protein Name
Myoglobin
Troponin-C
Gamma-B Crystallin
PDB Code
1TES
2JNF
1GCS
m
154
158
174
n0
1,231
1,232
1,474
n
2,478
2,401
2,844
• The interactions between multiple rigid α−helices that
rotate around flexible loops within the containing motifs/domains are considered. Two examples from the
PDB are used for this purpose: Myoglobin (PDB: 1TES)
and Troponin-C (PDB: 2JNF).
• The interactions between multiple rigid domains that
are connected via flexible loops within the containing
monomeric unit are examined. The example of GammaB Crystallin (PDB: 1GCS) is used for this purpose.
These PDB structures that are obtained from X-ray crystallography (e.g., 1TES and 1GCS) do not contain the H atoms,
hence are first preprocessed using Duke University’s MolProbity server [87,88] which predicts and adds the H atoms to the
coordinates information before importing the structure into
Protofold II. The PDB structures that are obtained from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometry (e.g., 2JNF),
on the other hand, already contain the H atoms positions.
5.3 Real Examples
The size of the molecules, i.e., the number of AA residues m
0
Having considered the folding of secondary structural ele- and the number of atoms n and n with and without the H
ments with complete flexibility (i.e., each peptide plane being atoms included, respectively, are given in Table 5.
treated as a separate rigid body), we proceed to study the
tertiary interaction between larger rigid units in real proteins. Secondary Structural Interactions. Let us first conWe report on the following case studies:
sider the energy variations when an α−helix of an α−domain
22
Figure 18: Myoglobin (PDB: 1TES) hinged at Asp-21 and Gly-125 for variations in φ21 , φ125 (left) and ψ21 , ψ125 (right).
Figure 19: Intramolecular versus total (i.e., solvation included) free energy landscape for Myoglobin (PDB: 1TES) in the
vicinity of the native conformation versus variations in (φ21 , ψ21 ) (left) and (φ125 , ψ125 ) (right).
Figure 20: Troponin-C (PDB: 2JNF) hinged at Thr-24 and Asp-145 for variations in φ24 , φ145 (left) and ψ24 , ψ145 (right).
Figure 21: Intramolecular versus total (i.e., solvation included) free energy landscape for Troponin-C (PDB: 2JNF) in the
vicinity of the native conformation versus variations in (φ24 , ψ24 ) (left) and (φ145 , ψ145 ) (right).
23
is reoriented from its stable conformation with respect to the
rest of the bundle, as illustrated in Figs. 18 and 20.
Myoglobin (PDB: 1TES) is an oxygen binding muscle protein that is composed of a single ‘globin fold’ domain, which
is an α−domain motif consisting of a bag of 8 α−helices
per domain (denoted A through H) arranged at ∼ +90◦ and
+50◦ angles with respect to each other, as shown in Fig.
18. This arrangement creates a hydrophobic pocket in the
interior that wraps the stabilizer co-factor known as ‘heme
group’ [89]. Assuming that the helices are rigid, we examine
the energy variations due to dihedral rotations at the loops
that connect the two end α−helices; namely, local changes in
(φi , ψi ) for i = 21 and i = 125 where the A and H helices are
hinged, respectively.
Troponin-C (PDB: 2JNF) is a calcium binding muscle protein that is composed of two ‘EF-hand’ domains, which are
α−domain motifs consisting of a bundle of 4 α−helices per
domain (denoted A through H) arranged in an up-and-down
anti-parallel conformation [89], as shown in Fig. 20. There is
a long pseudo-helical segment that connects the two globular
domains. Assuming that the helices are rigid, we examine
the energy variations due to dihedral rotations at the loops
that connect the two end α−helices; namely, local changes in
(φi , ψi ) for i = 24 and i = 145 where the A and H helices are
hinged, respectively.
Figures 19 and 21 show the free energy variations in vacuum (i.e., without considering solvation effects) and in water
(i.e., with considering solvation effects) for the two protein
domains as the end α−helices A and H of each are rotated
within a range of ±10◦ of the native (φi , ψi ) at the hinged
loops.13 In all four cases the energy model of Protofold II exhibits a local minima within ±1◦ of the native conformation.
We also observe that the solvation effects contribute a significant amount to the total free energy; however, the SASA
variations are so small in the considered neighborhood that
the location of the local minima is almost unchanged. The
van der Waals effects appear to be dominant in this neighborhood, manifested as the shape complementarity between the
ridges and grooves of the mobile α−helix and those of the
other helices in the bundle [90]. However, when variations
across larger angular ranges are considered, the solvation effects are expected to play a more determining role.
Figure 22: Gamma-B Crystallin (PDB: 1GCS) hinged at Ile81 for variations in φ81 and ψ81 , one at a time.
residues that belong to the connecting loop (e.g., i = 81). To
observe the global effects of solvation, we allow both dihedral
angles (φ81 , ψ81 ) to vary over the entire range of ±180◦ from
the native values. To facilitate visualization, this time we
consider only one angle’s variation at a time.
Figures 23 and 24 show the variations of the different energy terms.14 It appears that the van der Waals effects are
dominant in determining the profile of the energy well near
the native conformation, which can be attributed to the extensive contact interface between the two domains in Fig. 22.
The electrostatic and solvation effects substantially change
the energy landscape thus can dramatically affect the folding
pathway. However, they do not cause a significant change
in the location of the energy minimum. Once again, the
solvation energy is noisier due to the discrete nature of the
enumeration algorithm in Section 3.4. Another interesting
observation is that the electrostatic energy has discontinuities due to the cut-off approximation when pairs of atoms are
farther than 9.0 Å. Although it does not seem to affect the
minimum location in this example, larger cut-off distances
might be necessary for analyzing large proteins, since the accumulation of the pairwise errors grows quadratically with
the number of atoms.
6
Conclusion
The KCM approach to protein folding [44, 45] originally implemented into Protofold I [46–48] provides a promising fast
alternative to the popular MD simulation and MC sampling
methods by
Tertiary Structural Interactions. Lastly, we consider
1. modeling the protein chain as a kinematic linkage with
the energy variations when a rigid domains of a protein is
restricted DOF to which the well-studied principles from
reoriented with respect to another domain against which it
mechanism synthesis and robotics can be readily applied;
is packed into a stable structure.
and
Gamma-B Crystallin (PDB: 1GCS) is an eye-lens protein
2. replacing the 2nd-order dynamic response with 1st-order
that is made of two similar domains that are 40% identical in
kinetostatic integration of the equations of motion to
sequence [89]. Each domain is composed of two anti-parallel
facilitate convergence to the free energy minima.
β−sheets each made of 4 β−strands with the same arrangement topology [89], as shown in Fig. 22. Assuming that these In the present work, we introduced major model and impledomains are rigid, we analyze the energy variations due to mentation improvements in Protofold II by
rotating one domain with respect to the other at one of the
13 The
colormaps are generated using a nonlinear but consistent contouring scheme.
14 To enabel logarithmic plots, each energy ordinate is offset by a
constant value to shift its minimum to (the arbitrary positive value of)
100 kcal per mol.
24
Figure 23: Energy variations for Gamma-B Crystallin (PDB: 1GCS) versus changes in φ81 for fixed native ψ81 .
Figure 24: Energy variations for Gamma-B Crystallin (PDB: 1GCS) versus changes in ψ81 for fixed native φ81 .
25
1. incorporating the solvation effects that characterize the A
Peptide Chains
hydrophobic effect, i.e., the entropic changes due to cavity formation in the aqueous solvent;
This appendix overviews the structural biochemistry of peptide chains. Amino acids (AAs) are composed of a cen2. taking advantage from efficient auxiliary algorithms and tral carbon atom (denoted Cα ) attached to 4 chemical comdata structures to improve the computational complex- ponents; namely a carboxylate group (−COO− ), an amino
ity from O(n2 ) to expected O(n); and
group (−NH+
3 ), and a hydrogen atom (−H), common among
all types, and a variable side chain (denoted −R) [3]. The
3. implementing fast and relatively accurate evaluation of amino group of one AA reacts with the carboxyl group of anthe SASA and its gradient for solvation energy- and other to form a ‘peptide bond,’ eliminating a water molecule.
force-field computation, respectively, in parallel on both This so-called ‘condensation reaction’ repeats over and over
again to form a ‘peptide chain’ [3].
CPU and GPU.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the 3D structure of the peptide
The presented enumeration algorithm for the latter pro- chain can be uniquely represented by a set of bond lengths,
vides a fast approximate method, in which the degree of ac- and two sets of angles, namely the angles between adjacent
curacy is traded off with the performance by a proper choice bonds that share one atom (referred to as ‘bond angles’),
of the sample size. We argued that the inclusion of the sol- and those describing rotation around the bonds (referred to
vation free energy into the mix can significantly affect the as ‘torsion angles’ or ‘dihedral angles’). It is reasonable to
folding pathway for water-soluble proteins whose folding in assume that the bond lengths and bond angles are constant
vivo is dominated by such effects. We also demonstrated that [45], thus the dihedral angles exclusively specify the protein
the performance gain of the GPU-accelerated implementation conformation. For a protein with m AA residues denoted by
scales properly with the number of atoms, achieving up to two AAi (1 ≤ i ≤ m) numbered in order from N-terminus to Corders of magnitude in speed-ups after memory optimization. terminus, the 3 set of dihedral angles in the main chain are
Protofold II has been completely rearchitectured and is defined for 1 ≤ i ≤ m as
evolving into a versatile analysis toolbox for studying the
kinematic and structural behavior of molecular chains in
• the rotation angle ωi around the backbone C−N bond
protein engineering applications such as the design of nanothat connects the residues AAi and AAi+1 ;
manipulators [53, 54] among the ongoing projects. A hybrid
force-field model was used, composed of
• the rotation angle φi around the backbone N−Cα bond
in the residue AAi ; and
1. the AMBER model [67] (for noncovalent interactions);
and
• the rotation angle ψi around the backbone Cα −C bond
in the residue AAi .
2. supplemental terms similar to the CHARMM model [78]
and the GROMOS model [64] (for solvation effects) except for the probabilistic SASA estimation [63] replaced
Based on high resolution X-ray crystallographic studies,
with our own surface sampling algorithm.
the angle ω is very close to either 0◦ (the ‘cis’ conformai
This model is by no means versatile enough to enable addressing the ultimate goal of arriving from sequence to 3D
structure at a click of a button. Even though predicting folding of real 3D structures requires further developments, this
study represents a major step toward this goal.
7
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Sanguthevar Rajasekaran from
the Department of Computer Science and Engineering and
to Andrei Alexandrescu and Victoria Robinson from the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology at UConn for
providing instructive insight in this interdisciplinary project.
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants CMMI-1200089, CNS-0927105, and
CMMI-1462759. The responsibility for any errors and omissions lies solely with the authors.
tion) or 180◦ (the ‘trans’ conformation) [3], and the 6 atoms
in the peptide group Cα −CO−NH−Cα are approximately
coplanar, forming the so-called ‘peptide plane’ [45]. Due to
the partial double-bond characteristic of the peptide bond
C−N, the peptide groups are almost rigid, hence modeled
as rigid links hinged to the preceding and following peptide groups along the main chain [45]. These planes rotate
about the N−Cα and Cα −C bonds, which can be thought
of as revolute joints. Hence the ‘main chain dihedral angles’
φi and ψi completely specify the conformation of the backbone. In addition, each side chain can be treated as a shorter
linkage which can add up to 4 extra links with their associated joint angles, called ‘side chain dihedral angles’ (χi,1 to
χi,4 ). Therefore, the whole protein chain can be modeled
as an open kinematic linkage, conformation of which is fully
specified by a set of main chain and side chain dihedral angles. The
Pm resulted model has a reduced number of DOF of
2m + i=1 DOF(Ri ), where the DOF of the side chain Ri is
determined by the number of its side chain dihedral angles.
26
B
Prefix Computation
cluding global and local memories; and 2) on-chip memory
including shared memory, cache, and registers. The access
The prefix sum problem is fundamental to numerous impor- latencies to the on-chip are much less (around 100× faster)
tant algorithms, and is defined as follows. Given a finite or- than those of the off-chip memory.
dered sequence of elements X = (x1 , x2 , · · · , xn ) ∈ Σn and an
arbitrary binary operator ⊕ : Σ × Σ → Σ that is O(1)−time
References
computable and associative (i.e., (x ⊕ y) ⊕ z = x ⊕ (y ⊕ z)),
compute another sequence Y = (y1 , y2 , · · · , yn ) ∈ Σn where [1] Tavousi, P., Behandish, M., Kazerounian, K., and Ilies, H. T., 2013.
“An improved free energy formulation and implementation for kinetoy1 = x1 , y2 = x1 ⊕ x2 , · · · , yn = x1 ⊕ x2 ⊕ · · · ⊕ xn ; in
static protein folding simulation”. In Proccedings of the 2013 ASME
International Design and Engineering Technical Conferences and Comother words yi = yi−1 ⊕ xn for 1 ≤ i ≤ n where y0 is the
puter and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE’2013),
left-identity element (i.e., y0 ⊕ x = x for all x ∈ Σ).
no. DETC2013-12671, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME), pp. V06AT07A006:1–13.
It is trivial to show that the prefix sums can be computed sequentially in O(n), which is optimal. In addition, [2] Behandish, M., Tavousi, P., Ilies, H. T., and Kazerounian, K., 2013.
“GPU-accelerated parallel computation of free energy for kinetostatic
there are work-optimal parallel algorithms with a total comprotein folding simulation”. In Proccedings of the 2013 ASME Inputational work of T P = O(n) that carry out the prefix
ternational Design and Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE’2013),
computation in T = O(log n) time using P = O(n/ log n)
no. DETC2013-12675, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
CREW PRAM or in T = O(log n/ log log n) time using
(ASME), pp. V02AT02A009:1–12.
P = O(n log log n/ log n) CRCW PRAM processors with
[3] Kuriyan, J., Konforti, B., and Wemmer, D., 2012. The Molecules of
common conflict resolution [70]—see Appendix C.1 for deLife: Physical and Chemical Principles. Garland Science, Taylor &
Francis Group.
tails regarding PRAM.
[4] Anfinsen, C. B., 1973. “Studies on the principles that govern the folding
of protein chains”. Science, 181(4096).
C
C.1
Parallel Computing
[5] van Gunsteren, W. F., 1988. “The role of computer simulation techniques in protein engineering”. Protein Engineering, 2(1), pp. 5–13.
Abstract Machines
The parallel random-access machine (PRAM) is a sharedmemory abstract parallel computation model, typically assigned with the exclusive/concurrent-read (ER/CR) and
exclusive/concurrent-write (EW/CW) attributes [85]. The
most common attributes are CREW and CRCW, noting that
multiple processors can concurrently read a memory cell but
only one can write at a time to prevent race conditions. To
enable concurrent writing, one needs to resolve possible conflicts with typical mechanisms such as 1) ‘common’ meaning
that all processors attempt to write the same value); 2) ‘arbitrary’ meaning that one processor’s attempt succeeds at
random; and 3) ‘priority’ meaning that the processors are
prioritized by a prespecified order. Note that a CREW algorithm can always run in the same (if not fewer) number of
steps on a CRCW machine.
C.2
[6] Chirikjian, G. S., Kazerounian, K., and Mavroidis, C., 2005. “Analysis
and design of protein based nanodevices: Challenges and opportunities
in mechanical design”. Journal of Mechanical Design, 127(4), pp. 695–
698.
[7] Echenique, P., 2007. “Introduction to protein folding for physicists”.
Contemporary Physics, 48(2), pp. 81–108.
[8] Chothia, C., and Lesk, A. M., 1986. “The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins”. The EMBO journal,
5(4), p. 823.
[9] Martı́-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F.,
and Šali, A., 2000. “Comparative protein structure modeling of genes
and genomes”. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, 29(1), pp. 291–325.
[10] Krieger, E., Nabuurs, S., and Vriend, G., 2003. “Homology modeling”.
Methods of Biochemical Analysis, 44, pp. 509–524.
[11] Bowie, J., Luthy, R., and Eisenberg, D., 1991. “A method to identify
protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure”.
Science, 253(5016), pp. 164–170.
[12] Ginalski, K., Grishin, N. V., Godzik, A., and Rychlewski, L., 2005.
“Practical lessons from protein structure prediction”. Nucleic Acids
Research, 33(6), pp. 1874–1891.
GPU SIMT Model
A typical CUDA GPU program proceeds as follows. The data
is first transferred from the CPU (i.e., host) memory to the
GPU (i.e., device) memory. The host application invokes the
so-called kernels on the GPU with specified granularity, i.e.,
issuing a 1D, 2D, or 3D grid of blocks, each block being a 1D,
2D, or 3D array of threads that are sent in groups of 16 or 32
(called ‘warps’) to one of the streaming multiprocessors (SM).
The threads within the same block can access the fast shared
memory banks on the SM, and communication across blocks
is done using the global memory. The computed results are
transferred from the device memory back to the host memory.
There are different types of GPU memory locations, classified into two groups: 1) device (i.e., off-chip) memory in-
[13] Moult, J., Fidelis, K., Rost, B., Hubbard, T., and Tramontano, A.,
2005. “Critical Assessment of methods of protein Structure Prediction
(CASP)–round 6”. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 61(S7), pp. 3–7.
[14] Bradley, P., Misura, K. M. S., and Baker, D., 2005. “Toward highresolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins”. Science,
309(5742), pp. 1868–1871.
[15] Schueler-Furman, O., Wang, C., Bradley, P., Misura, K., and Baker,
D., 2005. “Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions”.
Science, 310(5748), pp. 638–642.
[16] Osguthorpe, D. J., 2000. “Ab Initio protein folding”. Current Opinion
in Structural Biology, 10(2), pp. 146–152.
[17] Bonneau, R., and Baker, D., 2001. “Ab Initio protein structure prediction: Progress and prospects”. Annual Review of Biophysics and
Biomolecular Structure, 30(1), pp. 173–189.
27
[18] Hansmann, U. H. E., and Okamoto, Y., 1994. “Comparative study of
multicanonical and simulated annealing algorithms in the protein folding problem”. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,
212(3), pp. 415–437.
[38] Ciccotti, G., and Kalibaeva, G., 2004. “Deterministic and stochastic
algorithms for mechanical systems under constraints”. Philosophical
Transactions-Royal Society Of London Series A Mathematical Physical And Engineering Sciences, 362, pp. 1583–1594.
[19] Simons, K., Kooperberg, C., Huang, E., and Baker, D., 1997. “Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local
sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring functions”.
Journal of Molecular Biology, 268(1), pp. 209–225.
[39] Rojnuckarin, A., Kim, S., and Subramaniam, S., 1998. “Brownian dynamics simulations of protein folding: Access to milliseconds time scale
and beyond”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(8),
pp. 4288–4292.
[20] Li, Z., and Scheraga, H., 1987. “Monte Carlo-minimization approach
to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding”. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 84(19), pp. 6611–6615.
[40] Gabdoulline, R. R., and Wade, R. C., 2001. “Protein-protein association: Investigation of factors influencing association rates by Brownian dynamics simulations”. Journal of Molecular Biology, 306(5),
pp. 1139–1155.
[21] David, J., and Doye, J. P. K., 1997. “Global optimization by basinhopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters
containing up to 110 atoms”. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A,
101(28), pp. 5111–5116.
[22] Nayeem, A., Vila, J., and Scheraga, H. A., 2004. “A comparative
study of the simulated-annealing and Monte Carlo-with-minimization
approaches to the minimum-energy structures of polypeptides:[met]enkephalin”. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 12(5), pp. 594–
605.
[23] Prentiss, M., Wales, D. J., and Wolynes, P. G., 2008. “Protein structure prediction using basin-hopping”. Journal of Chemical Physics,
128(22), p. 225106.
[24] Schug, A., and Wenzel, W., 2004. “Predictive in silico all-atom folding of a four-helix protein with a free-energy model”. Journal of the
American Chemical Society, 126(51), pp. 16736–16737.
[25] Schug, A., and Wenzel, W., 2006. “An evolutionary strategy for allatom folding of the 60-amino-acid bacterial ribosomal protein l20”. Biophysical Journal, 90(12), pp. 4273–4280.
[26] Verma, A., Gopal, S. M., Oh, J. S., Lee, K. H., and Wenzel, W., 2007.
“All-atom De Novo protein folding with a scalable evolutionary algorithm”. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 28(16), pp. 2552–2558.
[27] Abagyan, R. A., and Totrov, M., 1994. “Biased probability Monte Carlo
conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and
proteins”. Journal of Molecular Biology, 235(3), pp. 983–1002.
[28] Abagyan, R. A., and Totrov, M., 1999. “Ab Initio folding of peptides
by the optimal-bias Monte Carlo minimization procedure”. Journal of
Computational Physics, 151, pp. 402–421.
[29] Carr, J. M., and Wales, D. J., 2005. “Global optimization and folding
pathways of selected α-helical proteins”. Journal of Chemical Physics,
123(23), p. 234901.
[30] Klenin, K., Strodel, B., Wales, D., and Wenzel, W., 2011. “Modelling
proteins: Conformational sampling and reconstruction of folding kinetics”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics,
1814(8), pp. 977–1000.
[31] Gear, C. W., 1971. Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary
Differential Equations. Prentice Hall.
[41] Ando, T., and Yamato, I., 2005. “Free energy landscapes of two model
peptides: α-helical and β-hairpin peptides explored with Brownian dynamics simulation”. Molecular Simulation, 31(10), pp. 683–693.
[42] Frembgen-Kesner, T., and Elcock, A. H., 2009. “Striking effects of hydrodynamic interactions on the simulated diffusion and folding of proteins”. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 5(2), pp. 242–
256.
[43] Scheraga, H., Khalili, M., and Liwo, A., 2007. “Protein-folding dynamics: Overview of molecular simulation techniques”. Annual Reveiw of
Physical Chemistry, 58, pp. 57–83.
[44] Kazerounian, K., 2004. “From mechanisms and robotics to protein
conformation and drug design”. Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD),
126(1), pp. 40–45.
[45] Kazerounian, K., Latif, K., Rodriguez, K., and Alvarado, C., 2005.
“Nano-kinematics for analysis of protein molecules: Analysis and design
of protein based nanodevices”. Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD),
127(4), pp. 699–711.
[46] Kazerounian, K., Latif, K., Rodriguez, K., and Alvarado, C., 2004.
“ProtoFold: Part I–nanokinematics for analysis of protein molecules”.
In Proceedings of the 2004 ASME International Design Engineering
Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering
Conference (IDETC/CIE’2004), no. DETC2004-57243, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), pp. 645–658.
[47] Kazerounian, K., Latif, K., and Alvarado, C., 2004. “ProtoFold: Part
II–a successive kineto-static compliance method for protein conformation prediction”. In Proceedings of the 2004 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE’2004), no. DETC200457247, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), pp. 669–
677.
[48] Kazerounian, K., Latif, K., and Alvarado, C., 2005. “Protofold: A successive kinetostatic compliance method for protein conformation prediction”. Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD), 127, pp. 712–717.
[49] Shahbazi, Z., Ilieş, H. T., and Kazerounian, K., 2010. “Hydrogen bonds
and kinematic mobility of protein molecules”. Journal of Mechanisms
and Robotics (M&R), 2(2), pp. 021009:1–9.
[32] Beeman, D., 1976. “Some multistep methods for use in molecular
dynamics calculations”. Journal of Computational Physics, 20(2),
pp. 130–139.
[50] Shahbazi, Z., Pimentel, T. A. P. F., Ilieş, H., Kazerounian, K., and
Burkhard, P., 2010. “A kinematic observation and conjecture for creating stable constructs of a peptide nanoparticle”. In Advances in Robot
Kinematics: Motion in Man and Machine, J. Lenarcic and M. M.
Stanisic, eds. Springer Netherlands, pp. 203–210.
[33] Swope, W. C., Andersen, H. C., Berens, P. H., and Wilson, K. R., 1982.
“A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: Application
to small water clusters”. Journal of Chemical Physics, 76(1), pp. 637–
649.
[51] Shahbazi, Z., and Demirtaş, A., 2015. “Rigidity analysis of protein
molecules”. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering (JCISE), 15(3), pp. 031009:1–6.
[52] Shahbazi, Z., 2015. “Mechanical model of hydrogen bonds in protein molecules”. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 3(2),
pp. 47–54.
[34] Hockney, R. W., and Eastwood, J. W., 1988. Computer Simulation
Using Particles. Taylor & Francis.
[35] van Gunsteren, W., and Berendsen, H., 1988. “A leap-frog algorithm
for stochastic dynamics”. Molecular Simulation, 1(3), pp. 173–185.
[36] Ricci, A., and Ciccotti, G., 2003. “Algorithms for Brownian dynamics”.
Molecular Physics, 101(12), pp. 1927–1931.
[37] Guarnieri, F., and Still, W., 2004. “A rapidly convergent simulation
method: Mixed Monte Carlo/stochastic dynamics”. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 15(11), pp. 1302–1310.
28
[53] Tavousi, P., and Ilieş, H. T., 2015. “Synthesizing functional mechanisms from a link soup”. In Proccedings of the 2015 ASME International Design and Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE’2015),
no. DETC2015-47311, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME), pp. V05CT08A044:1–14.
[54] Tavousi, P., and Ilieş, H. T., 2016. “Synthesizing functional mechanisms
from a link soup”. Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD), (to appear).
[55] Mashayak, S. Y., and Tanner, D. E., 2011. Comparing solvent models for molecular dynamics of protein. Technical report, University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
[56] Jorgensen, W. L., and Tirado-Rives, J., 2005. “Potential energy functions for atomic-level simulations of water and organic and biomolecular systems”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 102(19), pp. 6665–6670.
[57] Wang, H., Junghans, C., and Kremer, K., 2009. “Comparative atomistic and coarse-grained study of water: What do we lose by coarsegraining?”. The European Physical Journal E: Soft Matter and Biological Physics, 28(2), pp. 221–229.
[58] Izvekov, S., and Voth, G. A., 2005. “Multiscale coarse graining of
liquid-state systems”. Journal of Chemical Physics, 123, p. 134105.
[75] Still, W. C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R. C., and Hendrickson, T., 1990.
“Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and
dynamics”. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 112(16),
pp. 6127–6129.
[76] Onufriev, A., Case, D., and Bashford, D., 2002. “Effective Born radii in
the generalized Born approximation: the importance of being perfect”.
Journal of Computational Chemistry, 23(14), pp. 1297–1304.
[77] Rappe, A., and Casewit, C., 1997. Molecular Mechanics Across Chemistry. University Science Books.
[78] Wesson, L., and Eisenberg, D., 1992. “Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution”. Protein Science,
1(2), pp. 227–235.
[79] Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R. F., 1982. “A simple method for displaying
the hydropathic character of a protein”. Journal of Molecular Biology,
157(1), pp. 105–132.
[59] Roux, B., and Simonson, T., 1999. “Implicit solvent models”. Biophysical Chemistry, 78(1), pp. 1–20.
[60] Eisenberg, D., and McLachlan, A., 1986. “Solvation energy in protein
folding and binding”. Nature, 319, pp. 199–203.
[61] Richmond, T. J., 1984. “Solvent accessible surface area and excluded
volume in proteins: Analytical equations for overlapping spheres and
implications for the hydrophobic effect”. Journal of Molecular Biology,
178(1), pp. 63–89.
[62] Brooks, B. R., Bruccoleri, R. E., Olafson, B. D., Swaminathan, S., and
Karplus, M., 2004. “CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy,
minimization, and dynamics calculations”. Journal of Computational
Chemistry, 4(2), pp. 187–217.
[80] Sharp, K. A., Nicholls, A., Friedman, R., and Honig, B., 1991. “Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: Relationship to protein folding and theoretical models”. Biochemistry, 30(40),
pp. 9686–9697.
[81] Lee, B., and Richards, F., 1971. “The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility”. Journal of Molecular Biology, 55(3), pp. 379–400, IN3–IN4.
[82] Wolfenden, R., Andersson, L., Cullis, P. M., and Southgate, C. C. B.,
1981. “Affinities of amino acid side chains for solvent water”. Biochemistry, 20(4), pp. 849–855.
[83] Muller, M. E., 1959. “A note on a method for generating points uniformly on n−dimensional spheres”. Communications of the ACM
(CACM), 2(4), pp. 19–20.
[63] Wodak, S. J., and Janin, J., 1980. “Analytical approximation to the accessible surface area of proteins”. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, 77(4), pp. 1736–1740.
[64] Fraternali, F., and van Gunsteren, W. F., 1996. “An efficient mean solvation force model for use in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins
in aqueous solution”. Journal of Molecular Biology, 256(5), pp. 939–
948.
[65] van Gunsteren, W. F., Daura, X., and Mark, A. E., 2002. “GROMOS
force field”. Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry.
[66] Allison, J. R., Boguslawski, K., Fraternali, F., and van Gunsteren,
W. F., 2011. “A refined, efficient mean solvation force model that
includes the interior volume contribution”. The Journal of Physical
Chemistry B, 115(15), pp. 4547–4557.
[67] Weiner, S. J., Kollman, P. A., Case, D. A., Singh, U. C., Ghio, C.,
Alagona, G., Profeta, S., and Weiner, P., 1984. “A new force field for
molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins”. Journal
of the American Chemical Society, 106(3), pp. 765–784.
[68] Cornell, W., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C., Gould, I., Merz, K., Ferguson, D.,
Spellmeyer, D., Fox, T., Caldwell, J., and Kollman, P., 1995. “A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids,
and organic molecules”. Journal of the American Chemical Society,
117(19), pp. 5179–5197.
[84] Yershova, A., and LaValle, S. M., 2004. “Deterministic sampling methods for spheres and so(3)”. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’2014), Vol. 4,
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), pp. 3974–3980.
[85] Maggs, B. M., Matheson, L. R., and Tarjan, R. E., 1995. “Models
of parallel computation: A survey and synthesis”. In Proceedings of
the 28th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 2,
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), pp. 61–70.
[86] Lins, R. D., and Ferreira, R., 2006. “The stability of right- and lefthanded alpha-helices as a function of monomer chirality”. Quı́mica
Nova, 29(5), pp. 997–998.
[87] Davis, I. W., Leaver-Fay, A., Chen, V. B., Block, J. N., Kapral, G. J.,
Wang, X., Murray, L. W., Arendall, W. B., Snoeyink, J., Richardson,
J. S., and Richardson, D. C., 2007. “MolProbity: All-atom contacts
and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids”. Nucleic Acids
Research, 35, pp. W375–W383.
[88] Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino,
R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S., and Richardson,
D. C., 2009. “MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography”. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 66(1), pp. 12–21.
[69] Weiser, J., Shenkin, P. S., and Still, W. C., 1999. “Approximate atomic
surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO)”. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 20(2), pp. 217–230.
[89] Petsko, G. A., and Ringe, D., 2004. Protein Structure and Function.
New Science Press.
[70] Cole, R., and Vishkin, U., 1989. “Faster optimal parallel prefix sums
and list ranking”. Information and Computation, 81(3), pp. 334–352.
[90] Eilers, M., Patel, A. B., Liu, W., and Smith, S. O., 2002. “Comparison of helix interactions in membrane and soluble α−bundle proteins”.
Biophysical Journal, 82(5), pp. 2720–2736.
[71] Gupta, K. C., 1986. “Kinematic analysis of manipulators using the zero
reference position description”. The International Journal of Robotics
Research, 5(2), pp. 5–13.
[72] Subramanian, R., and Kazerounian, K., 2007. “Improved molecular
model of a peptide unit for proteins”. Journal of Mechanical Design
(JMD), 129(11), pp. 1130–1136.
[73] Bajaj, C., and Zhao, W., 2010. “Fast molecular solvation energetics and
forces computation”. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(6),
pp. 4524–4552.
[74] Fogolari, F., Brigo, A., and Molinari, H., 2002. “The Poisson–
Boltzmann equation for biomolecular electrostatics: A tool for structural biology”. Journal of Molecular Recognition, 15(6), pp. 377–392.
29
| 5cs.CE
|
1
Elements of nonlinear analysis of information streams
A.M. Hraivoronska, D.V. Lande
Institute for Information Recording of the NAS of Ukraine
[email protected]
Abstract
This review considers methods of nonlinear dynamics to apply for analysis of time series
corresponding to information streams on the Internet. In the main, these methods are based on
correlation, fractal, multifractal, wavelet, and Fourier analysis. The article is dedicated to a detailed
description of these approaches and interconnections among them. The methods and corresponding
algorithms presented can be used for detecting key points in the dynamic of information processes;
identifying periodicity, anomaly, self-similarity, and correlations; forecasting various information
processes. The methods discussed can form the basis for detecting information attacks, campaigns,
operations, and wars.
Key words: Information streams, time series, nonlinear dynamics, correlation analysis, fractal
analysis, forecasting
Introduction
To study information streams on the Internet, i.e., the streams of messages published on
websites, social networks, blogs, etc., up-to-date techniques should be applied, because known
methods of generalizing information arrays (classification, phase integration, cluster analysis, etc.)
are not always suitable for an adequate quantitative reflection of processes occurring in the
information space [Lande, 2007].
Quantitative analysis of the dynamics of information streams generated on the Internet has
become one of the most informative methods for investigating topicality of various themes in the
information space. Diverse qualitative factors influence the dynamics, with many of them cannot be
described accurately. However, the general nature of the time-dependent number of thematic
publications on the Internet allows constructing mathematical models, studying, and forecasting.
The observed time-dependent volume of information streams convincingly shows that the
mechanisms of their generation and dissemination are associated with complex nonlinear processes.
This article is dedicated to this particular subject.
A formal description of the information stream
For information streams to be described formally, we introduce some general assumptions.
First let us define an information stream [Dodonov, 2009]. This definition corresponds to the
classical definition used in the information theory.
Consider a segment of the time axis
such that
. Assume that the number of
documents published during this period equals to , which occurs according to some patterns.
Suppose documents are published at times
.
The process
is called the information stream if the realization of this process consists
of the numbers of points (documents) appeared from
to . Further, we are going to consider
discrete time series corresponding to the function
. Note that the values of the function
belong to and do not decrease; therefore, this function is a nondecreasing step function. The
values of the time series are the step sizes. Further, we deal with discrete time series, with the
values fixed at equidistant time intervals. Denote such time series by
or for short
{ } , assuming that the observations are made at time interval :
.
The problem under consideration requires the time series to be described only in terms of the
probability distribution, i.e., we consider statistical time series. In the article, we analyze a time
series as a realization of some stochastic process.
2
As examples, we will use three time series obtained from the network service Google Trends.
These time series reflect the level of interest to Donald Trump, Hilary Clinton and the information
attacks of "Russian hackers" from August 2016 to April 2017. Time series obtained from Google
Trends show the dynamics of the popularity for the search query. The maximum of the graph is
100, which corresponds to the date when the query was most popular, and all other points are
determined as a percentage of the maximum. All the time series are shown in Figure 1. For referring
conveniently, we denote these time series by T (D. Tramp), C (H. Clinton), and H ("Russian
hackers")
Figure 1. Time series obtained from Google Trends. These time series reflect the level of interest to D.
Trump, H. Clinton and "Russian hackers" from August 2016 to April 2017.
Correlation
Many methods of studying time series are based on some assumption about statistical
equilibrium or stability. One of such useful assumptions is stationarity [Box, 2015].
A time series is called strictly stationary if its statistical properties are not affected by a
change of time origin. Formally, if the joint probability distribution of random variables
is exactly the same as the joint probability distribution of
for all integer k, then the time series { }
is said to be strictly stationary. A stationary time series
has a constant mean and a constant variance
with the values
series
and
can be estimated as the sample mean and the sample variance of the time
̂
̅
∑
̂
∑
̅
(1)
The stationarity assumption is also of great importance for comparing time series. A
measure of linear dependence between random variables is covariance. Defined for time series is
the covariance function. By definition, cross-covariance at lag
between random processes
{ }
and { }
is equal to
[
(
)]
It follows from the assumption of strict stationarity that the joint probability distribution of
is the same for any . It implies that the covariance between
and
do not depend on ,
depending only on . In other words,
for all . The collection of values {
}
is called the cross-covariance function.
To get a cross-correlation coefficient, we normalize a cross-covariance coefficient
Note that the cross-correlation function is a measure of similarity between time series.
The cross-correlation and cross-covariance coefficients have following wide-used estimates
[Montgomery, 2008]
3
̂
∑
̅
̅
̂
̂
̂
Figure 2 is provided to illustrate the definition of correlation. We consider two time series
with zero means. To get the correlation coefficient between these time series we should multiply
corresponding values and calculate their average. The result of the multiplication is shown as the
line without markers in Figure 2. The area of the darkened region is equal to the covariance
coefficient between the time series, taking into account the sign.
Figure 2. The darkened region shows the contribution to the correlation between time series.
Consider the estimation of the cross-correlation function for time series T and C (Figure 3).
The function has maximum (approximately 0.8) at lag 0. It means that two time series which
correspond to the interest level to Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton are strongly correlated.
Figure 3. The cross-correlation function for the T and C time series versus lag.
Autocorrelation
One can calculate the covariance not only using two different time series but also using just
one time series. The covariance between two values of one time series is called the autocovariance
at lag k
[
]
The collection of the values
collection of the normalized values
[
is called the autocovariance function and the
is called autocorrelation function
]
√
The autocorrelation function describes the correlation between values of a random process at
different times [Chatfield, 2004].
In many cases the autocovariance and autocorrelation coefficients are estimated as follows
4
̂
∑
̅
̅
̂
̂
̂
Shown in Figure 4 is the autocorrelation function of time series T.
Figure 4. The autocovariance function of the T time series versus lag.
Fourier analysis
The classical Fourier analysis is applied to study a function in the time and frequency
domains. The idea behind the mapping to the frequency domain is that a function is decomposed
into components that are harmonic oscillations at different frequencies. Each frequency corresponds
to a coefficient that reflects the amplitude of the oscillation at a given frequency. If we represent the
function graphically in the time domain, we get information about how the function changes over
the time. If we represent the function in the frequency domain, we obtain information about the
frequencies of the oscillations it contains. Mathematically speaking, to map a function from one
domain to another the direct and inverse Fourier transform are used
̂
∫
∫ ̂
Shown in Figure 5a is an example of the function defined as a sum of three sins with different
periods. If we look at the graphical representation of the function in the time domain, it is quite
difficult to understand that the function consists of three harmonic oscillations and determine their
periods. Shown in Figure 5a is the Fourier transform for the function. From the graph in the
frequency domain, it is clear that the function contains oscillations at three different frequencies.
a
b
Figure 5. (a) The sum of three sins with different periods.
(b) The estimated Fourier spectrum for the function shown in (a).
5
The Fourier transform has various modern applications in machine learning systems. In many
investigations, the Fourier spectra are used as train data. For example, proposed in [Rodrigues
2014] is a time series predictive model in which the Fourier spectrum with some other parameters is
the input for a neural network.
The Fourier transform can be thought of as a correlation between the signal and different
oscillating functions. Figure 6 illustrates this idea similarly to Figure 2.
Despite its advantages and numerous applications, the Fourier transform is a quite
meaningless method for investigating functions that evolve over time. For such functions, we need
some approach of estimating the spectrum not over the entire length of the time series, but over its
various parts. An example of such an approach is Gabor transform
∫
The window function
gives higher weight to the part of a time series around the time
, with the parameter determining a width of the window.
Figure 6. An illustration to the definition of the Fourier transform as the correlation between the
function in question and a harmonic function.
When using the Gabor transform, there is a problem to choose the width of the window. The
next type of transforms allows making the window function frequency-dependent in such a way that
the window becomes wider for low frequencies and narrower for high ones. This type is called the
wavelet transform. The main advantage of the wavelet transform is that a part of the time series is
analyzed with the degree of detail that corresponds to its size.
Wavelet analysis
The wavelet transform has a correlation nature. In this case, we consider a correlation of the
function with a wavelet. For this procedure to be always possible to perform and the correlation
coefficients to be informative, the wavelet must satisfy certain mathematical criteria. Literally, the
word wavelet means a "small wave" and, as the name implies, the wavelet is well localized in time.
Mathematically speaking, the wavelet is a function
which satisfies the following properties:
1.
The function
energy
is square integrable (
∫|
2.
By ̂
) or, in other words, has finite
|
denote the Fourier transform of
, then
6
∫
|̂
|
Shown in Figure 7 are examples of wavelets which are widely used in applications
Figure 7. Examples of wavelets to be applied in practice. The Gaussian wave, the Mexican hat wavelet,
the Haar wavelet, and the Morlet wavelet (real part).
Continuous wavelet transform
The wavelet
described above is called the mother wavelet or analyzing wavelet. Based
on the mother wavelet, a family of wavelets is constructed by stretching/squeezing and moving
along the time axis. These transformations are necessary for exploring different parts of the original
signal with various degrees of detail.
Let and be a scale parameter and a location parameter. Then the shifted and dialed
version of the mother wavelet is as follows
√| |
(
)
The wavelet transform has been called a ‘mathematical microscope,’ where is the location
of the time series being ‘viewed’ and is associated with the magnification at location b. [Addison,
2017]
The continuous wavelet transform of the function
√| |
∫
(
)
is
∫
}
where
is complex conjugate of , the values {
is called the
coefficients of the wavelet transform.
From the formula in the definition of the continuous wavelet transform, one can see that the
essence of this transform is the calculation of correlation coefficients.
Let us visualize the wavelet coefficients for T, C, and H time series. Shown in Figure 8 are
so called wavelet transform plots (plots of
versus and ). The results of the wavelet
transform for T are shown in Figure 8 (a, b) where the Mexican hat wavelet (a) and the Gaussian
wave wavelet (b) have been used. The results of the wavelet transform for C and H are shown in
Figure 8 (c, d).
a
b
c
d
Figure 8. (a, b) The wavelet transform coefficients for the time series T obtained using the Mexican hat
wavelet and the Morlet wavelet; (c, d) The wavelet transform coefficients for the time series C and H obtained
using the Mexican hat wavelet.
7
Note once again that both the continuous Wavelet transform and the Fourier transform can be
considered in terms of correlation. The Fourier transform is the correlation between the time series
and the wave function
. The wave covers the entire time axis and has the only one
parameter , therefore the Fourier transform depends only on the frequency. The wavelet transform
is the correlation between the time series and the wavelet
. Thus, the wavelet transform
depends on the location of the wavelet on the time axis and its scale parameter .
Comparing time series using the wavelet transform
Let us consider some approaches to comparing time series in wavelet space. These
approaches can be applied to determine some kind of relationship between time series. Numerous
metrics for comparing the coefficients of wavelet transforms as well as examples of their
application to practical problems are described in detail in [Addison, 2017].
Consider two time series and . By
and
denote their coefficients of the
wavelet transform. We begin with the simplest way to compare two collections of values, namely,
we substitute the absolute values of the coefficients
|
|
|
|
Shown in Figure 9 are
for pairs of time series: T and C, T and H. In this
simple way, it is possible to highlight regions in which the wavelet coefficients are similar, and
consequently, the time series have similar parts.
Figure 9. The values of
for the pair T and C (left) and the pair T and H (right).
Additional information can be obtained by using a complex wavelet (for example, the
Morlet wavelet). Then, in addition to the absolute value of the wavelet coefficients, one can use a
phase. Recall that the complex coefficient can always be represented in the form
|
|
Therefore, we can compare the phases of the coefficients
The cross-wavelet transform is used to determine regions of the coincidental energy between
time series in the transform domain, as well as to get the relative phase
The absolute values |
| are often plotted to visualize this metric. In this case, the plot is
similar to a scalogram, and if time series and are identical, we get exactly the scalogram.
Appling the cross-wavelet transform is of particular interest in the case when a complex
wavelet is used. It follows
|
|
||
|
|
(
|
|
)
Thus, by calculating the cross-wavelet transform, it is possible to find the phase difference
between the wavelet coefficients for two time series.
Shown in Figure 10 are
for the T and C time series where the Mexican hat
wavelet has been used. Highlighted for T and C (the left part of Figure 10) is the region
corresponding to the peak of interest during the election. In this region both time series have high
energy.
8
Figure 10. The cross-wavelet transform for the pair T and C (left) and the pair T and H (right).
The methods of cross-wavelet analysis are useful for studying properties of several time
series with non-trivial dependence among themselves. For example, [Aguiar-Conraria, 2008]
applies the cross-wavelet analysis tools to show that the relationship between monetary policy
variables and macroeconomic variables has changed over time, and these changes are not
homogeneous at different frequencies. Data obtained with the help of the cross-wavelet transform
can also be used as input data for classification algorithms. In [Dey, 2010], the coefficients of the
cross-wavelet transform are used as the input to an artificial neural network and a Fuzzy classifier.
-method
Scalograms obtained by the continuous wavelet transform are used to visualize special
features of time series. In [Lande, 2009] another method of visualization is proposed. The method
helps to identify trends, periodicity and local features of the time series. Moreover, the proposed
approach is much easier to implement than the wavelet analysis.
The Δ-method is based on the DFA (Detrended Fluctuation Analysis) method, which will
also be considered in the article. The essence of the approach is to determine and visualize the
absolute deviation of the accumulated time series from the corresponding values of linear
approximation.
Now we describe -method in more detail. First, let us fix a length for a segment. We split
up the time series into overlapping segments. For the point we choose the segment with length s
and the center at the point (or at the point
if s is even). For each segment fit the points in it
with a linear function. Denote the value of local approximation at the point by
. Next,
calculate the absolute deviation of from the approximation line, as follows
|
|.
According to the method we calculate values
Firstly, we calculate standard deviation with given
√ ∑|
for all
|
and
[
].
√ ∑
Secondly, we take the average value of
∑
Further, the values obtained are demonstrated on a diagram similar to the scaling diagram.
An example of such diagram is shown in Figure 12.
Figure 12. The coefficients obtained with the
-method for T.
9
The proposed method of visualizing absolute deviations
allows to identify single and
irregular peaks, sharp changes in the values of quantitative indicators at different times, as well as
harmonic components in time series.
Fractal analysis
Many objects in the world are statistically self-similar (a classic example is coastlines). Selfsimilarity means that parts of such objects have the same statistical characteristics at different
scales. When studying the dynamic of information streams, the structure of document arrays on the
Internet, and processes in the information space, self-similar structures often arise, and in particular,
self-similar time series.
Let us define the self-similar process.
} is called the self-similar process with the Hurst
The real-valued process {
} are identical to the finiteexponent
if the finite-dimensional distributions of {
} for all
dimensional distributions of {
. This requirement may be written
economically as
{
}
{
}
By definition, changing the time scale for a self-similar process is equivalent to changing the
scale of the process values. This means that realizations of such processes are similar at different
scales. However, it is natural that the process is not an exact copy of itself at different scales, only
statistical properties are the same.
The Hurst exponent is known to be a measure of persistence - the tendency of the process to
trends. The value H = 0.5 means that behavior of time series is uncorrelated, as in Brownian
motion. Values in the range 0.5 <H <1 mean that the directed dynamics of the process in the past is
likely to lead to proceeding the movement in the same direction. If H< 0.5 then the process is likely
to change the direction [Braichevsky, 2010].
Let us describe some properties of self-similar processes that are of particular importance for
applications. First, the autocovariance function of a self-similar process decays to zero
hyperbolically, and the following estimate takes place
where
is a slowly-varying-at-infinity function. Consequently, the series of covariance
coefficients is divergent
∑
This divergent series indicates a long-term dependence in the time series.
Second, let us split the time series { } into non-overlapping segments with
elements in
each one. Denote by {
} the means for each segment. Then the variance of the mean decays
(
slower than the inverse to the size of the sample
)
.
Estimating the Hurst exponent
The best-known method for estimating the Hurst exponent is rescaled range (R/S) method.
Let us recall the standard deviation for a time series { }
√ ∑
and the range
̅
̅
∑
10
∑
̅
Dividing R by S we get the rescaled range. For many time series observed the rescaled range
is well-fitted by the following power law
( )
The estimate of the Hurst exponent can be obtained by calculating
statistic as a
function of , plotting
versus
, and fitting a straight line. The slope of the line gives
the estimate of the Hurst exponent.
We will apply
method to get the Hurst exponent for the T, C and H time series. Shown
in Figure 12 are the results of assessing for T series. The obtained values of the Hurst exponent are
0.62 for T and 0.68 for C, which points out that these processes appear to follow a trend, although
not very strictly.
a
b
Figure 12. (a) The dependence of the R / S statistics on time for the T series on a log-log plot.
(b) The dependence of the Hurst exponent on time for the T series.
As for the H time series, the dependence of
on
is poorly fitted by a straight
line, because the line shown in Figure 13a has a strong fracture. If we plot the dependence of the
Hurst exponent on time (Figure 13b), we can determine the time from which begins to decrease.
Marking this time on the plot of H time series (Figure 13c), it becomes clear that the process before
this time has much smaller variance than after.
The behavior of the H time series since the beginning of December 2016 (the beginning of
the largest peak in the values of the time series) can be analyzed separately from the first part. The
estimate of the Hurst exponent for the second part of the time series equals to 0.7. It should be taken
into account that this time series becomes too short for
analysis. Time series must have at least
200 elements and better more than 300 elements to achieve correct results. Nevertheless, the sharp
change in the dependence of the Hurst exponent on time indicates that the process under
investigation is made up of various processes. In such cases, it may be useful to analyze these
processes separately.
11
a
b
c
Figure 13. (a) The dependence of the R / S statistics on time for the H series on a log-log plot.
(b) The dependence of the Hurst exponent on time for the H series. (c) The H time series with the time of a rapid
change marked.
Multifractals
The only one fractal dimension turns out to be not enough to describe many self-similar
objects found. In many cases, real objects are not homogeneous. The multifractal theory provides a
more general description of the essential characteristics of complex self-similar objects. According
to this theory, an object is characterized by a continuous spectrum of dimensions, which makes
possible to distinguish homogeneous objects from heterogeneous ones.
Multifractal set (signal) can be understood as a union of homogeneous fractal subsets
(signals) with different fractal dimensions. The fractal dimensions are represented in a multifractal
spectrum to be defined later. It is worth noticing that the multifractal spectrum can be used as a
measure of similarity between objects. We can use such approach, for example, to form
representative samples from document arrays, as an addition to traditional methods based on the
identification of content similarity of documents. This approach has following practical
applications: presenting to the user adequate number of search results that reflect the full range of
the documentary array; selecting subsets of documents for further research [Lande, 2009a].
The
exponent and multifractal analysis
To define the multifractal spectrum, the H lder exponent will be required. The H lder
exponent characterizes the smoothness of a function and contains information on the regularity of a
function in a neighborhood of a point. The smaller the H lder exponent is, the less regular the
function is.
Let be a locally bounded function on and
. The H lder exponent of at
{
|
|
}
In other words, the H lder exponent characterizes local behavior of the function in the
following way
|
|
It is mentioned above that multifractal objects are not homogeneous; hence, their pointwise
H lder regularity changes from point to point. Therefore, it is useful to obtain information about
sets in which the exponent takes a given value
{
}
12
To make some meaningful conclusions about
one should determine and compare the
sizes of such sets. It follows from practical cases that the fractal dimension is a reasonable
formalization of size to be used in such analysis [Aldroubi, 2016]. This reasoning leads to the
definition of the multifractal spectrum.
The multifractal spectrum of a locally bounded function
is the mapping
Thus, the multifractal spectrum reveals the values of the H lder exponent contained in the
heterogeneous object (set, signal, measure) and proportionality among them. Each value of the
H lder exponent corresponds to the fractal dimension of the set in which the value of the Holder
exponent is equal to a given one.
An approach to estimating the multifractal spectrum
The theoretical approach to the determination of the multifractal spectrum is described
above. For practical purposes, a calculation of the H lder exponent at each point and determination
of the fractal dimensions are numerically unstable and often meaningless. Therefore, a numerical
approach is different. It based on the following lemma which follows from the definition of the
H lder exponent.
Lemma. Let
[
be a locally bounded function and
(
[
( (
)))
], then
]
where denoted by
is the range of the function on the set .
It follows from the lemma that the multifractal formalism for functions can be based on the
structure function
∑
( (
))
(2)
)
(3)
and the corresponding scale function
(
(
)
that leads to defining the multifractal spectrum as follows
The expression for the multifractal spectrum through the scale function can be applied to the
numerical analysis of time series. First, the structure function and the scale function are determined,
and then through the Legendre transform, we come up with the multifractal spectrum [Mallat,
2009].
The DFA method and its application to estimating the multifractal
spectrum
[Peng, 1994] proposes the Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) method to determine
long-term correlations in noisy and non-stationary time series. The key feature of the DFA method
is that it is based on the theory of random walks. The time series is not analyzed in the original
form. Instead, the series is transformed to accumulated sums
∑
13
In this case, the point appears to be the location of the random walk after steps. Further,
the DFA method involves an analysis of the mean square deviation from the trend in various
regions of the series.
For the DFA method, many modifications have been proposed, as well as applications to
numerous practical tasks. An overview of such methods is given, for example, in [Kantelhardt,
2009]. In particular, -method introduced above is based on the DFA method. An important step
is the development of an approach to the numerical estimation of the multifractal spectrum based on
the DFA method. This method is called Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (MF-DFA)
and is proposed in [Kantelhardt, 2002]. The effectiveness of the MF-DFA method was analyzed for
various model time series (Brownian motion, fractional Brownian motion, binomial cascades)
[Oswiecimka, 2012]. The method is also actively used for the analysis of real time series, for
example, economic ones [Suarez-Garcia, 2013]. A step-by-step description and explanation of the
MF-DFA algorithm can be found in [Thompson, 2016].
The use of wavelets for estimating the multifractal spectrum
Wavelets are a natural tool to investigate the fractal characteristics of an object [Jaffard,
2004] [Aldroubi, 2016]. The reason for this is the fact that the pointwise H lder exponent can be
estimated through the wavelet coefficients. The following proposition connects the wavelet
transform with the H lder exponent.
Proposition. Let the function has the Hölder exponent
at the point . Assume that the
function at has not an oscillating singularity. If the first moments of the wavelet are equal 0
and
, then
[ ]
(4)
Otherwise, if we choose the wavelet with
, then
[ ]
(5)
From the proposition it follows that the behavior of the function in a neighborhood of
[ ]
can be characterized as follows: the smoother the function is, the more quickly
decays
as s tends to zero. For instance, if the function is continuously differentiable at the point (this
means that
), then the wavelet transform approximately has the form (5). It means that
[ ]
the values
depend on the form of the wavelet. In practice, we often meet a
fundamentally different case in which the function at the point has a H lder exponent in the
range from 0 to 1. In this case, the formula (4) is valid. This connection between the approximate
behavior of wavelet coefficients and the H lder exponent is of essential importance for the waveletbased estimation of the multifractal spectrum.
The use of maxima lines for estimating the spectrum. WTMM
The approach to estimating the multifractal spectrum using the maximum lines has been
actively developed since [Mallat, 1992]. The expressions (4) and (5) turns out to be valid if we
[ ]
[ ]
consider the curve of local modulus maxima of
instead of the sequence
for a constant and decreasing scale . First, we introduce the necessary definitions.
[ ]
[ ]
A modulus maximum is a point
such that
, where
[ ]
denoted by is either left or right neighbor of , with the strict inequality
[ ]
hold for at least one neighbor of
(left or right). A maxima line is a connected
curve in the scale space
along which all points are modulus maxima. The set of maxima lines
obtained from the wavelet transform of the function is called the skeleton.
The skeleton for the series T is shown in Figure 15 (on the left, the skeleton is plotted over
the wavelet coefficients). Such plots may be useful for visualization purposes.
14
Figure 15. The skeleton (the maxima lines) for the T series.
The structure function depended on the maxima lines is as follows
∑ (
|
[ ]
|)
Knowing the structure function, we can use formula (2) and (3) to determine the scaling
function and the multifractal spectrum. Shown in Figure 16 are the scaling functions and the
multifractal spectra for the T, C and H series. For comparing, Figure 16a shows the theoretic scaling
function for Brownian motion
.
Figure 16. The scaling function for the T (a circle), C (a triangular), and H (an asterisk) time series; and
the corresponding multifractal spectra estimated with the WTMM method.
The multifractal spectrum can be used to compare time series. The same shape of
multifractal spectra indicate the similarity of the series, otherwise, the different shapes of the spectra
mean that there are fundamental differences in the nature of the series. This property is used in
various studies. For example, [Sun, 2001] analyzes statistically how varying certain parameters
affects the multifractal spectrum for the Hang Seng index in the Hong Kong stock market. [Zhou,
2009] presents an overview of the scientific results in the field of economics based on a comparison
of multifractal spectra. Using the Dow Jones Industrial Average as an example, the author identifies
economic factors that affect the shape of the spectrum.
Conclusion
Modern methods based on nonlinear analysis are to be applied for efficient analysis of modern
information processes based on the monitoring of information streams from global computer
networks, with many methods are of successful application in natural sciences. Up-to-date
approaches to the analysis and modeling of public and information systems can be based on
methods approved in natural sciences. Analyzing information streams is the foundation for
modeling, design, and forecasting. The approaches discussed in this article allow describing
information processes, information influence, general trends in the dynamics of information
processes. At the same time, progress in mastering the modern information space is impossible
without forming general ideas about the structure and properties of the dynamics of network
information processes. This process requires identifying and taking into account stable patterns of
the dynamics. Note that approaches based on the accurate methods, mathematical theory, and
computer simulating can provide one-up qualitative results. This is conditioned by the
multiparametericity of real models. Nevertheless, even such results can explain reality in many
cases better than traditional qualitative methods.
15
The methods, algorithms, analytical tools discussed in this article are not only a demonstration
basis for explaining real events and processes but also necessary components for planning and
forecasting.
References
[Addison, 2017] Addison, Paul S. The illustrated wavelet transform handbook: introductory
theory and applications in science, engineering, medicine and finance, Second edition / Addison,
Paul S. – Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. – 446 p.
[Aguiar-Conraria, 2008] Aguiar-Conraria, L. Using Wavelets to Decompose the Time–
Frequency Effects of Monetary Policy / Luıs Aguiar-Conrariaa, Nuno Azevedob, Maria Joana
Soares // Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. – 2008. – Vol. 387. – Issue 12. – P.
2863–2878.
[Aldroubi, 2016] Aldroubi, A. New Trends in Applied Harmonic Analysis: Sparse
Representations, Compressed Sensing, and Multifractal Analysis / Akram Aldroubi, Carlos
Cabrelli, Stephane Jaffard, Ursula Molter (eds.). – Birkhäuser Basel, 2016. – 334 p. – (Applied and
Numerical Harmonic Analysis)
[Box, 2015] Box, G. E. P. Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control / George E. P. Box,
Gwilym M. Jenkins, Gregory C. Reinsel, Greta M. Ljung. – New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
– 712 p.
[Braichevsky, 2007] Braichevsky S., Lande D., Snarskii A. On the fractal nature of mutual
relevance sequences in the Internet news message streams // arXiv preprint arXiv: 0710.0228, 2007.
[Chatfield, 2004] Chatfield, C. The analysis of time series: an introduction 6th ed. / Chris
Chatfield. – CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC, 2004. – 333 p.
[Dey, 2010] Dey, D. Cross-wavelet Transform as a New Paradigm for Feature Extraction
from Noisy Partial Discharge Pulses / D. Dey, B. Chatterjee, S. Chakravorti, S. Munshi // IEEE
Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. – 2010. – Vol. 17. – No. 1. – P. 157–166.
[Dodonov, 2009] Dodonov O.G. Information streams in global computer / Dodonov O.G.,
Lande D.V., Putiatin V.G. – К: Naukova dumka, 2009. – 295 p.
[Feder, 1991] Feder J. Fractals. – Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, 1988. — 305 p.
[Harte, 2001] Harte D. Multifractals. Theory and applications / David Harte. – Chapman and
Hall/CRC , 2001. – 264 p.
[Jaffard, 2004] Jaffard, S. Wavelet Techniques in Multifractal Analysis / Jaffard, S // Fractal
Geometry and Applications: a Jubilee of Benoit Mandelbrot – Multifractals, Probability and
Statistical Mechanincs, Applications. – San Diego: 2004. – Vol. 72. – Part 2. – P. 91-151.
[Kantelhardt, 2002] Kantelhardt, Jan W., Zschiegner Stephan A., Koscielny-Bunde Eva et al.
Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series /– Physica A: Statistical
Mechanics and its Applications. V.316, 2002. – P. 87-114.
[Kantelhardt, 2009] Kantelhardt, Jan W. Fractal and multifractal time teries / Kantelhardt, Jan
W. // Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. – Springer, 2009. – P. 3754–3779.
[Lande, 2007] Dimitri Lande, Sergei Braichevski und Dimitri Busch.Informationsfluesse im
Internet // IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 59(2007), Heft 5, Seiten 277-284.
[Lande, 2009] Lande D.V., Snarskii A.A. Diagram of measurement series elements deviation
from local linear approximations // arXiv preprint arXiv:0903.3328, 2009.
[Mallat, 1992] Mallat, S. Singularity Detection and Processing with Wavelets / Stephane
Mallat, Wen Liang Hwang // IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. – 1992. – Vol. 38. – No. 2.
– P. 617–643.
16
[Mallat, 2009] Mallat, S. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing The Sparse Way / Stephane
Mallat. – Academic Press, 2009. – 805 p.
[Mandelbrot, 1982] Mandelbrot, B. B. The fractal geometry of nature / Benoit B. Mandelbrot.
– W. H. Freeman and Company, 1982. – 468 p.
[Montgomery, 2008] Montgomery, Douglas C. Introduction to time series analysis and
forecasting / Douglas C. Montgomery, Cheryl L. Jennings, Murat. – New Jersey: John Wiley &
Sons, 2008. – 441 p. – (Wiley series in probability and statistics)
[Oswiecimka, 2012] Effect of detrending on multifractal characteristics / Oswiecimka P.,
Drozd S., Kwapien J., Gorski A.Z. – eprint arXiv:1212.0354, 2012.
[Peng, 1994] Mosaic organosation of DNA nucleotides / [Peng C.-K., Buldyrev S. V., Havlin
S. et al.] – Physical Review E, V. 49 E. 2, 1994.
[Rodriguez, 2014] Rodriguez N., Bravo G., Rodriguez N., Barba L. Haar Wavelet Neural
Network for Multi-step-ahead Anchovy Catches Forecasting // Polibits. - 2014. - Issue 50. - P. 4953.
[Snarskii, 2007] Snarskii А.А., Lande D.V., Braichevskii S.M., Darmokhval А. Distribution
of documents according to the degree of relevance based on multifractal properties // Internetmatematika 2007: Proceedings of the contest participants. – Ekaterinburg, Publishing house of the
Ural University, 2007. – 224 p.
[Suarez-Garcia, 2013] Suarez-Garcia P. Multifractality and long memory of a financial index
/ Suarez-Garcia P., Gomez-Ullate D. – eprint arXiv:1306.0490, 2013.
[Sun, 2001] Sun, X. Multifractal analysis of Hang Seng index in Hong Kong stock market /
X. Sun, H. P. Chen, Z. Q. Wu, Y. Z. Yuan // Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.–
2001. – Vol. 291. – Issue 1–4. – P. 553–562.
[Thompson, 2016] Thompson, James. R. Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis:
Practical Applications to Financial Time Series / Thompson, James. R., Wilson, James R. //
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. – 2016. – Vol. 126. – Issue C. – P. 63–88.
[Zhou, 2009] Zhou, W.-X. The components of empirical multifractality in financial returns /
Wei-Xing Zhou // EPL. – 2009. – Vol. 88. – Issue 2. – Article Number 28004.
| 8cs.DS
|
Intercell Interference-Aware Scheduling for Delay
Sensitive Applications in C-RAN
arXiv:1708.00852v1 [cs.IT] 2 Aug 2017
Yi Li, M. Cenk Gursoy and Senem Velipasalar
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244
Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract— Cloud radio access network (C-RAN) architecture
is a new mobile network architecture that enables cooperative
baseband processing and information sharing among multiple
cells and achieves high adaptability to nonuniform traffic by
centralizing the baseband processing resources in a virtualized
baseband unit (BBU) pool. In this work, we formulate the utility
of each user using a convex delay cost function, and design a twostep scheduling algorithm with good delay performance for the CRAN architecture. In the first step, all users in multiple cells are
grouped into small user groups, according to their interference
levels and estimated utilities. In the second step, channels are
matched to the user groups to maximize the system utility. The
performance of our algorithm is further studied via simulations,
and the advantages of C-RAN architecture is verified.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Recently, the traffic load of wireless cellular networks has
grown dramatically due to increasing number of smart mobile
devices. In order to satisfy the growing demands and provide
the required quality of service (QoS) guarantees and high
reliability in next-generation 5G wireless systems, several advanced techniques have been proposed, and cloud radio access
network (C-RAN) is one novel mobile network architecture
that improves the performance of cellular networks. By centralizing the baseband processing resources of multiple cells in
a virtualized baseband unit (BBU) pool, C-RAN can achieve
cooperative processing among different cells and utilize the
BBUs more efficiently [1] [2]. As shown in Figure 1, remote
radio heads (RRHs) and BBU are separated geographically and
connected via optical fibers in the C-RAN architecture. BBU
pool is shared between cells as a virtualized cluster. Compared
with the conventional architectures in which BBUs of different
cells are not shared, C-RAN can achieve information exchange
and cooperative processing between cells more easily with low
latency, and it has high adaptability to nonuniform traffic. A
comprehensive survey on C-RAN and its implementation is
provided in [3].
For most orthogonal frequency division multiple access
(OFDMA)-based cellular networks, intercell interference (ICI)
is a significant interference source because of the frequency
reuse among multiple neighbouring cells. Many advanced
methods have been studied to control ICI. For instance, the
soft frequency reuse (SFR) scheme is proposed in [4] and [5],
in which cell edge users transmit with high power in nonoverlapping cell edge bands allocated to adjacent cells, and
This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation grants
CCF-1618615, ECCS-1443994, CNS-1443966, CNS-1302559, and CNS1206291.
center users use the cell center bands with limited transmission
power. The authors in [6] further compared the performance
of SFR with partial frequency reuse scheme. In these conventional ICI control schemes, cooperation between neighbouring
cells are not considered, which limits their performances. In
C-RAN, cooperative processing among the cells sharing the
same BBU pool becomes easier and more efficient, which
helps to improve ICI control. In [7], a resource allocation and
RRH association algorithm was proposed for ICI coordination
in a long term evolution (LTE) heterogeneous network setting
with C-RAN architecture. However, optimization over multiple
cells greatly increases the complexity, which causes problems
in delay sensitive applications. In this work, we propose, for
C-RAN, an ICI-aware scheduling algorithm that controls the
ICI with relatively low complexity.
In addition, packet delay is an important performance
criterion for delay sensitive applications such as live video
streaming and online gaming. In most of the related studies
considering ICI control, the objectives are interference minimization, SINR maximization and throughput maximization,
and hence delay minimization is not addressed. In this work,
our scheduling algorithm performs user grouping and resource
allocation with the goal of minimizing the delay violation
probability. The utility formulation used in this paper has also
been employed in our previous work [8].
The main contributions in this paper are listed as follows:
1) We propose a two-step ICI-aware scheduling algorithm
for C-RAN that minimizes the delay violation probability of the system.
2) We design a novel user grouping algorithm for the user
grouping step, which controls the interference among
the users in the same group.
3) We formulate the channel assignment problem in the
second step as a maximum-weight matching problem,
which can be solved using standard algorithms in graph
theory.
4) We verify the performance of our algorithm via simulations, and compare our algorithm with a conventional
soft frequency reuse (SFR) algorithm. Also, the influence of the system parameters is investigated with the
help of numerical results.
II. S YSTEM M ODEL AND P RELIMINARIES
In this section, we introduce our system model in the first
subsection, and subsequently describe the utility formulation
used in this work in the second subsection.
Fig. 1. System model of C-RAN with ICI
A. System Model
In this work, the uplink transmission in a C-RAN within an
OFDMA setting is considered as shown in Fig. 1. There are Nc
cells in this network, and each cell is served by a base station
with one RRH. RRHs are connected to a centralized BBU pool
with multiple BBUs working cooperatively. All cells reuse Nch
frequency bands/channels, and each channel has a bandwidth
of B. The total number of mobile users in this network is
fixed at Nu , and users are assumed to be associated with their
nearest RRHs. Each user is equipped with a buffer storing
the arriving packets before sending them through the wireless
uplink channels, and the size of each packet is assumed to be
Ip bits. All buffers are assumed to operate in a first-in firstout (FIFO) manner. The system is assumed to operate under
delay constraints, and target delay of packets sent by the ith
user is denoted by Di (time frames). Block fading is assumed
in this work, in which the fading coefficients stay constant
within one time frame with a duration of T , and change across
frames. Also it is assumed that the distributions of the fading
coefficients are identical in different channels.
At the beginning of each time frame, BBU pool allocates
channel resources to the users using a scheduling algorithm.
It is assumed that users keep silent until they get channel
resources from the BBU pool, and the channel resources are
returned back at the end of each time frame. There are 4
assumptions for the channel assignment:
1) The number of users is much greater than the number
of available channels, Nu ≫ Nch . In such a case, each
user transmits using one channel at most.
2) Only the users that can satisfy the pair-wise interference
constraints given in (9) can reuse the same channel
resource.
3) Users associated with the same RRH cannot reuse the
same channel resource.
4) The BBU pool is assumed to have perfect channel side
information (CSI), and it is also assumed to keep track of
the buffer status (including the queue length and packet
delay information) of each user.
The first assumption addresses a heavy load scenario, in which
all channels are reused by multiple users and ICI becomes a
significant problem. In such a case, the assumption that each
user transmits using one channel at most helps to reduce ICI
caused by excessive frequency reuse. The second assumption
limits the interference, and the third assumption guarantees
that all interference comes from neighbouring cells. The last
assumption guarantees that the BBU pool has enough information to conduct our scheduling algorithm. CSI is estimated
at RRHs and sent to the BBU pool via optical fiber links.
Information of the arrival rates at all users is also sent to the
BBU pool via special feedback channels2 , and the BBU pool
can track the queue status at each user.
Define Ψj (t) as the set of users that use the j th channel
in the tth time frame, and ξi,j (t) as the indicator function
that indicates whether the j th channel is assigned to the ith
user in the tth time frame. In other words, ξi,j (t) = 1 if i ∈
Ψj (t), otherwise ξi,j (t) = 0. According to our first channel
PNch
assignment assumption, we have j=1
ξi,j (t) ≤ 1. Then for
the tth time frame, the received signal corresponding to user i
at its associated base station can be expressed as
yi = hji xi +
X
hjk,i xk + nji
(1)
k∈Ψj (t),k6=i
if ξi,j (t) = 1. Above, xi represents the transmitted signal of
user i, hji denotes the fading coefficient of the channel between
user i and its corresponding RRH, hjk,i denotes the fading
coefficient of the interference channel between user k and the
RRH associated with user i, and nji is the background noise
at the base station associated with user i which is assumed
to follow an independent complex Gaussian distribution with
zero mean and variance σ 2 , i.e., nji ∼ CN (0, σ 2 ). The
transmission rate of user i in the tth time frame is given by
ri (t) = T B log2
1+
Pi zij
Bσ 2 +
P
k∈Ψj (t),k6=i
j
Pk zk,i
!
bits/frame
(2)
where j is the index of the channel that is assigned to user
i, Pi represents the transmission power of user i, T is the
duration of each time frame, B is the bandwidth of each
j
channel, zij = |hji |2 , and zk,i
= |hjk,i |2 .
B. Convex Delay Cost and Utility
In the convex delay cost approach, the cost function of a
packet is formulated as an increasing convex function of its
delay [9]. The high performance of this approach was shown
in [10] for a single cell model without any interference. In
our previous work [8], we designed a scheduling algorithm
using the convex cost function provided in [10] for a D2D
communication setting, and verified via simulations that this
approach has very good delay performance. Here, we define
the cost of the j th packet in the buffer at user i as
Cj,i =
dj,i
,
Di
(3)
where dj,i is the current delay of this packet, and Di is the
target delay of user i. At user i, the number of packets that
can be transmitted in the current time frame is
µi = min {li , ⌊ri /Ip ⌋} ,
2 We
assume ideal feedback without delay and error.
(4)
where li is the number of packets waiting in the buffer at user
i, Ip is the size of each packet, and ⌊·⌋ represents the floor
function. The utility of user i is defined as
Ui =
µi
X
Cj,i ,
(5)
j=1
and the utility of the system is defined as
U=
Nu
X
Ui =
µi
Nu X
X
Cj,i .
(6)
i=1 j=1
i=1
The utility given in (6) represents the total cost of the packets
that can be transmitted to the base station in the current time
frame. At the beginning of each time frame, the BBU pool runs
a scheduling algorithm for channel assignment to maximize
the utility. In the next section, a detailed discussion on our
scheduling algorithm is provided.
III. ICI-AWARE S CHEDULING A LGORITHM
FOR
A. User Grouping
In the first step of our algorithm, we divide all users into
small groups, and each group will be assigned a channel
resource in the next step. Before channel assignment, we
cannot compute the instantaneous transmission rates because
the sets Ψ1 , Ψ2 , · · · , ΨNch have not been determined yet.
Therefore, we use a rate estimator
r̂i =
1
ri (τ )
m τ =t−m
(7)
instead. This rate estimator is essentially the average rate over
the most recent m time frames. Plugging (7) into (4) and (5),
we obtain the utility estimator of user i as
Ûi =
µ̂i
X
min{li ,⌊r̂i /Ip ⌋}
Cj,i =
j=1
X
Cj,i .
(8)
j=1
In order to control ICI, we assume that any two users (i1
and i2 ) reusing the same channel resource have to satisfy the
pairwise interference/SINR constraints given by
n
o
nP z o
Pi1 zi1
i1 i1
E
≥
γE
2
Bσ 2
i2 zi2 ,i1 o
n
n Bσ +P
o
Pi2 zi2
Pi2 zi2
E
≥
γE
2
2
Bσ +P z
Bσ
,
Input: γ, transmission power and utility estimator of each user, the fading
coefficients.
Output: User groups GP1 , GP2 , · · · , GPNg .
Collect the utility estimators Ûi into a vector V = [Û1 , Û2 , · · · , ÛNu ].
Set k = 1
While max(V) ≥ 0
Set V∗ = V and GPk = ∅
While max(V∗ ) ≥ 0
i = arg max(V∗ )
Add user i into GPk .
Set V(i) = −1 and V∗ (i) = −1.
For j from 1 to Nu
Set V∗ (j) = −1 if user i and j cannot satisfy the
interference constraints given in (9) or they are associated
to the same RRH.
End
End
k = k+1
End
C-RAN
In this section, we introduce our scheduling algorithm. In
each time frame, our scheduling algorithm assigns channels
to the users in a way that maximizes the utility given in (6).
Since we consider a C-RAN architecture, the BBU pool has
the knowledge of all fading distributions and cost functions
of each packets, and it can allocate channel resources to all
users in different cells together. Our scheduling algorithm can
be divided into two steps, namely the user grouping step and
channel matching step. In the first step, we divide all users
into small groups such that the users in the same group reuse
the same channel. In the second step, we match the channels
to the user groups to maximize the utility.
t−1
X
TABLE I
U SER G ROUPING A LGORITHM
(9)
i1 i1 ,i2
where the parameter γ is between 0 and 1. Since the
distributions of the fading coefficients are identical in different
channels, the expected values of the SINRs and SNRs in (9)
do not depend on the channel assignment result. The details
of our user grouping algorithm is given in Table I, and we
denote the number of the output user groups as Ng .
At the beginning, we set group GPk as an empty set. Each
time, we select the user with the maximum utility estimator
and include it into GPk . After adding a user into a group, we
kick out the users that cannot reuse the same channel resource
with this selected user by setting V∗ (j) = −1, which can be
processed in parallel at the BBU pool. Our grouping algorithm
aims to collect the users with high utility estimators together,
which helps to serve these users with less channel resources.
Note that the number of groups Ng might be smaller than
the number of channels Nch . In such cases, some of the
channels cannot be assigned to users, and we need to break
those groups with large sizes into several small groups so that
Ng = Nch . To divide a big group into two small groups, we
select half of the users with smaller utility estimator values
within the large group, and let them form a new small group.
B. Channel Matching
In the second step, we assign channels to the user groups
via the maximum-weight matching approach. In this step,
we find a matching between user groups and channels that
maximizes the system utility given in (6). Let us define ηi,j
as the indicator of the channel assignment result, i.e., ηi,j = 1
if channel j is assigned to GPi , and ηi,j = 0 if channel j
is not matched to GPi . Then the matching problem can be
formulated as
Maximize
Subject to
ηi,j
U
ηi,j ∈ {0, 1}
Nch
X
ηi,j ≤ 1
j=1
Ng
X
ηi,j = 1.
i=1
In graph theory, the maximum-weight matching problem
can be solved by the Hungarian algorithm (Kuhn-Munkres
algorithm) [11]. To use the Hungarian algorithm, we have
to first construct the utility matrix U, in which each row
In summary, we propose a two-step scheduling algorithm
with good delay performance for a multi-cell C-RAN model.
In the first step, we group the users to control the ICI and
aim to collect the users with high utility estimator values into
smaller number of groups. In the second step, we formulate the
channel allocation problem as a maximum-weight matching
problem, and assign the channel resources to the user groups
using the Hungarian algorithm. Although our algorithm only
considers an uplink scenario, it can also be easily adapted to
a downlink scenario.
Since we consider a C-RAN model, our algorithm is
performed considering users in multiple cells, and parallel
processing can be performed in some parts of our algorithm
at the BBU pool to reduce time consumption. Compared
with conventional resource allocation algorithms, in which
cooperative processing among multiple cells is not considered,
our algorithm has a significant potential to achieve better
performance.
Assume that the number of processers at BBU pool is
Θ(Nc ), then the time complexity of the user grouping step
is O(Nu2 /Nc ). In the matching step, the time consumption for constructing the utility matrix is O(Ng Nch /Nc ),
and the time consumption of the Hungarian algorithm is
O(max{Ng , Nch }3 ). To further accelerate this process, we
can replace the Hungarian algorithm with some heuristic
algorithms with time complexity of O(min{Ng , Nch }). As
an example, in each iteration, we can select the maximum
element in the utility matrix, and match its corresponding
group and channel together. The overall time consumption of
this algorithm depends on the relationship among Nu , Nc , Ng
and Nch .
IV. N UMERICAL R ESULTS
In this section, we further study the performance of our
algorithm and the influence of parameters via simulations. In
our simulations, we consider a C-RAN with 3 adjacent cells,
each with a radius of 2. The coordinates of the RRHs of these
three cells are (−2, 0), (0, 2) and (2, 0), respectively. In each
cell, there are 5 randomly placed users, and each one has the
max
maximum transmission power PBσ
2 = 13 dB. The number of
available channels is Nch = 5. We assume Rayleigh fading
with path loss E{z} = s−4 , where s represents the distance
between the transmitter and the receiver. Each point on the
curves is determined by taking the average over the results of
500 systems with randomly placed users, and the performance
result of each system is evaluated over 5 × 104 time frames.
In Figs. 2 and 3, we study the influence of the interference
control parameter γ, which is used in the pairwise interference
constraints expressed in (9). The arrival rate at user i is set
ρ=0.6
0.7
Delay violation probability
C. Summary and Complexity Analysis
0.8
ρ=0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
γ
Fig. 2. Delay violation probability vs. interference control parameter γ
18
Average throughput (packets/user/frame)
corresponds to a user group and each column corresponds to
a channel. The element of this matrix Ui,j is the sum utility of
the users in GPi if the j th channel is assigned to that group.
The elements of the utility matrix can be computed in parallel
at the BBU pool. After constructing the utility matrix, the
Hungarian algorithm is applied, and channels are assigned to
the users.
ρ=0.6
ρ=0.7
17
16
15
14
13
12
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
γ
Fig. 3. Throughput vs. interference control parameter γ
as λi = ρE{T B log2 (1 + Pi zi /Bσ 2 )}, where the parameter
ρ is the arrival intensity. The target delay is 25 time frames
for all users, and all users transmit at their maximum power
level. When γ is small, the ICI is not well controlled and the
average transmission rate is not maximized. As γ increases, the
system achieves lower delay violation probability and higher
throughput due to better ICI management. However, when γ is
too large, the interference constraints become too strict, which
leads to less frequency reuse. In such cases, the throughput
becomes smaller and the delay violation probability increases.
In Figs. 4 and 5, we analyze the influence of power
control on our algorithm. In several conventional ICI control
algorithms such as SFR, cell center users transmit with small
power to reduce the interference they cause to the cell edge
users. We adopt this strategy and apply it in our algorithm.
In these two figures, the transmission power of user i is
selected as Pi = Pmax (si /Rcell )α , where si is the distance
between the user and its corresponding RRH, and Rcell is
the radius of the cell. As α increases, cell center users are
restricted to transmit with smaller power. Also, all arrival rates
are set as λ = 1.5E{T B log2 (1 + Pmax zedge /Bσ 2 )}, where
E{T B log2 (1+Pmax zedge /Bσ 2 )} is the average transmission
rate of a user at the edge of its associated cell. In Figs. 4 and
5, we notice that as α increases, both delay and throughput
performances become worse. Our algorithm control the inter-
the users in that cell. The results are provided in Table II. As
the arrival intensity increases, the advantage of our algorithm
becomes obvious in terms of the average delay. With the CRAN architecture, cooperative processing over multiple cells
enhances the delay performance significantly.
0.8
Delay violation probability
0.7
0.6
0.5
V. C ONCLUSION
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
α
Fig. 4. Delay violation probability vs. power control parameter α
Average throughput (packets/user/frame)
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
α
Fig. 5. Throughput vs. power control parameter α
ference in the user grouping step. Users that cannot satisfy the
pairwise interference constraints are not allowed to reuse the
same channel resource. Further decrease in the transmission
power of the cell center users reduces their transmission rates,
making it more difficult to stabilize the system.
Finally, we compare our algorithm with the conventional
SFR scheme introduced in [6]. The arrival rates are set in the
same way as in Figs. 2 and 3, and the target delay is 40 for
all users. In our algorithm, all users transmit with maximum
power. In the SFR scheme, users transmit with full power in
the edge bands and they use 70% of their maximum power
in the center bands. Channel assignment is conducted at the
BBU of each cell individually to maximize the sum utility of
TABLE II
C OMPARISON BETWEEN OUR ALGORITHM AND SFR
In this work, we have proposed an ICI-aware scheduling
algorithm for the C-RAN architecture that minimizes the sum
delay cost of the system. The procedure is divided into two
steps, namely the user grouping step and the channel matching
step. In the user grouping step, we have designed a grouping
algorithm that partitions all users in the network into small
groups by checking their pairwise interference levels. In order
to serve those users with high utility values with less channel
resources, our grouping algorithm aims to collect users with
high utility estimator values into small number of groups. In
the channel matching step, we have formulated the channel
assignment problem as a maximum-weight matching problem,
which can be solved using the Hungarian algorithm. In the
second step, user groups are matched to the available channel
resources with goal of maximizing the system utility. Finally,
we have studied the impact of the interference threshold
and power control parameter via simulations, and compared
our algorithm to the conventional SFR scheme. With the
advantages of cooperative processing and information sharing
over multiple cells, it has been verified that our algorithm
designed for C-RAN can achieve higher throughput and lower
delay.
R EFERENCES
[1] Y. Lin, L. Shao, Z. Zhu, Q. Wang, and R. K. Sabhikhi, “Wireless network
cloud: Architecture and system requirements,” IBM Journal of Research
and Development, vol. 54, pp. 4:1–4:12, Jan. 2010.
[2] C. Mobile, “C-RAN: The road towards green RAN,” White Paper, ver,
vol. 2, Oct. 2011.
[3] A. Checko, H. L. Christiansen, Y. Yan, L. Scolari, G. Kardaras, M. S.
Berger, and L. Dittmann, “Cloud RAN for mobile networks - A
technology overview,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 17,
pp. 405–426, Firstquarter 2015.
[4] A. Simonsson, “Frequency reuse and intercell interference co-ordination
in E-UTRA,” in IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC)
Spring, pp. 3091–3095, Apr. 2007.
[5] M. C. Necker, “Local interference coordination in cellular OFDMA
networks,” in IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) Fall,
pp. 1741–1746, Sep. 2007.
[6] Y. Xiang, J. Luo, and C. Hartmann, “Inter-cell interference mitigation
through flexible resource reuse in OFDMA based communication networks,” in European wireless, vol. 2007, pp. 1–7, Apr. 2007.
[7] S. Deb, P. Monogioudis, J. Miernik, and J. P. Seymour, “Algorithms for
enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) in LTE HetNets,”
IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 22, pp. 137–150, Feb. 2014.
[8] Y. Li, M. C. Gursoy, and S. Velipasalar, “Scheduling in D2D underlaid
cellular networks with deadline constraints,” in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) Fall, Sep. 2016.
[9] J. A. Van Mieghem, “Dynamic scheduling with convex delay costs: The
generalized cµ rule,” The Annals of Applied Probability, pp. 809–833,
Aug. 1995.
[10] J. A. Van Mieghem, “Due-date scheduling: Asymptotic optimality of
generalized longest queue and generalized largest delay rules,” Operations Research, vol. 51, pp. 113–122, Feb. 2003.
[11] H. W. Kuhn, “The hungarian method for the assignment problem,” Naval
Research Logistics Quarterly, vol. 2, pp. 83–97, Mar. 1955.
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv:1612.01464v2 [quant-ph] 5 Mar 2017
Finite blocklength and moderate deviation analysis
of hypothesis testing of correlated quantum states
and application to classical-quantum channels with memory
Cambyse Rouzéa and Nilanjana Dattaa
a
Statistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB30WB, UK
March 13, 2018
Abstract
Martingale concentration inequalities constitute a powerful mathematical tool in the
analysis of problems in a wide variety of fields ranging from probability and statistics
to information theory and machine learning. Here we apply techniques borrowed from
this field to quantum hypothesis testing, which is the problem of discriminating quantum
states belonging to two different sequences {ρn }n and {σn }n . We obtain upper bounds
on the finite blocklength type II Stein- and Hoeffding errors, which, for i.i.d. states, are
in general tighter than the corresponding bounds obtained by Audenaert, Mosonyi and
Verstraete in [5]. We also derive finite blocklength bounds and moderate deviation results
for pairs of sequences of correlated states satisfying a (non-homogeneous) factorization
property. Examples of such sequences include Gibbs states of spin chains with translationinvariant finite range interaction, as well as finitely correlated quantum states. We apply
our results to find bounds on the capacity of a certain class of classical-quantum channels
with memory, which satisfy a so-called channel factorization property - both in the finite
blocklength and moderate deviation regimes.
1
Introduction
Quantum Hypothesis Testing
The goal of binary quantum hypothesis testing is to determine the state of a quantum system,
given the knowledge that it is one of two specific states (ρ or σ, say), by making suitable measurements on the state. In the language of hypothesis testing, one considers two hypotheses
– the null hypothesis H0 : ρ and the alternative hypothesis H1 : σ. The measurement done to
determine the state is given most generally by a POVM {T, I − T } where 0 ≤ T ≤ I, and I
denotes the identity operator acting on the Hilbert space of the quantum system. Adopting
the nomenclature from classical hypothesis testing, we refer to T as a test. There are two
associated error probabilities:
Type I error: α(T ) := Tr ((I − T )ρ) ,
and
1
Type II error:
β(T ) := Tr (T σ) ,
which are, respectively, the probabilities of erroneously inferring the state to be σ when it
is actually ρ and vice versa. There is a trade-off between the two error probabilities, and
there are various ways to optimize them, depending on whether or not the two types of errors
are treated on an equal footing. In the case of symmetric hypothesis testing, one minimizes
the total probability of error α(T ) + β(T ), whereas in asymmetric hypothesis testing one
minimizes the type II error under a suitable constraint on the type I error.
Quantum hypothesis testing was originally studied in the asymptotic i.i.d. setting, in
which, instead of a single copy, multiple (say n) identical copies of the state were assumed to be
available, and a joint measurement on all of them was allowed. The optimal error probabilities
were evaluated in the asymptotic setting (n → ∞) and shown to decay exponentially in n. The
decay rates were quantified by different statistical distance measures in the different cases: in
symmetric hypothesis testing it is given by the so-called quantum Chernoff distance [4, 35]; in
asymmetric hypothesis testing, the optimal decay rate of the type II error probability, when
evaluated under the constraint that the type I error is less than a given threshold value, is
given by the quantum relative entropy [21, 37], whereas, when evaluated under the constraint
that the type I error decays with a given exponential speed, it is given by the so-called
Hoeffding distance [18, 34, 36]. The type II errors in these two cases of asymmetric hypothesis
testing, are often referred to as the Stein error and the Hoeffding error, respectively.
The consideration of the asymptotic i.i.d. setting in quantum hypothesis testing is, however, of little practical relevance, since in a realistic scenario only finitely many copies (n) of
a state are available. More generally, one can even consider the hypothesis testing problem
involving a finite sequence of states {ωn }n , where for each n, ωn is one of two states ρn or
σn , which need not be of the i.i.d. form: ρn = ρ⊗n and σn = σ ⊗n . We refer to the hypothesis
testing problem in these non-asymptotic scenarios as finite blocklength quantum hypothesis
testing, the name “finite blocklength” referring to the finite value of n. Finding bounds on
the error probabilities in these scenarios is an important problem in quantum statistics and
quantum information theory. To our knowledge, this problem has been studied thus far only
by Audenaert, Mosonyi and Verstraete [5]. They obtained bounds for both the symmetric
and asymmetric cases mentioned above, in the non-asymptotic but i.i.d. scenario.
In this paper we focus on asymmetric, finite blocklength quantum hypothesis testing,
and find improved upper bounds on the Stein- and Hoeffding errors, in comparison to those
obtained in [5] in the i.i.d. setting. We also find upper bounds on the same quantities in
the case of non i.i.d. states satisfying a factorization property. Our framework can also be
applied to the analysis of the case where the error of type I converges sub-exponentially with
a rate given by means of a moderate sequence, extending the results recently found in [10, 11].
Finally, we apply our results to the problem of finding bounds on capacities of a certain type
of classical-quantum channels with memory, both in the finite blocklength case and in the
asymptotic framework of moderate deviations.
In the case of uncorrelated states, we obtain our results by use of martingale concentration inequalities. Concentration inequalities deal with deviations of functions of independent
random variables from their expectation, and provide upper bounds on tail probabilities of the
type P(|X − E[X]| ≥ t) which are exponential in t; here X denotes a random variable which is
a function of independent random variables. These simple and yet powerful inequalities have
turned out to be very useful in the analysis of various problems in different branches of math2
ematics, such as pure and applied probability theory (random matrices, Markov processes,
random graphs, percolation), information theory, statistics, convex geometry, functional analysis and machine learning. Concentration inequalities have been established using a host of
different methods. These include martingale methods, information-theoretic methods, the socalled “entropy method” based on logarithmic Sobolev inequalities, the decoupling method,
Talagrand’s induction method etc. (see e.g. [42, 8] and references therein). In this paper, we
apply two inequalities, namely the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality [22, 6] and the Kearns-Saul
inequality [28] (which have been established using martingale methods and hence fall in the
class of so-called martingale concentration inequalities) to quantum hypothesis testing in the
i.i.d. setting. Moreover, the proofs of the results we obtain in the case of quantum hypothesis
testing for correlated states are reminiscent of this framework. We include a brief review of
martingales and these inequalities in Section 2. To our knowledge, martingale concentration
inequalities have had rather limited applications in quantum information theory thus far (see
e.g. [15, 23]). We hope that our use of these inequalities in finite blocklength and moderate
deviation analyses of quantum hypothesis testing will lead to further applications of them in
studying quantum information theoretic problems.
Quantum Stein’s lemma and its refinements
Consider the quantum hypothesis testing problem in which the state ωn which is received is
either ρn or σn , the latter being states on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space Hn . The type I
and type II errors for a given test Tn (where 0 ≤ Tn ≤ In and In is the identity operator on
Hn ), are given by
α(Tn ) = Tr[(In − Tn )ρn ] and β(Tn ) = Tr[Tn σn ].
(1.1)
As mentioned in the Introduction, in the asymmetric setting, one usually optimizes the type
II error β(Tn ) under one of the following constraints on the type I error α(Tn ): (i) α(Tn ) is
less than or equal to a fixed threshold value ε ∈ (0, 1) or (ii) α(Tn ) satisfies an exponential
constraint α(Tn ) ≤ e−nr , for some fixed parameter r > 0. The optimal type II errors are
then given by the following expressions, respectively:
βn (ε) :=
β̃n (r) :=
inf
{β(Tn )|α(Tn ) ≤ ε}
(1.2)
inf
{β(Tn )|α(Tn ) ≤ e−nr }.
(1.3)
0≤Tn ≤In
0≤Tn ≤In
We refer to βn (ε) as the type II error of the Stein type (or simply the Stein error), and we
refer to β̃n (r) as the type II error of the Hoeffding type (or simply the Hoeffding error).
In the i.i.d. setting, ρn := ρ⊗n and σn := σ ⊗n , with ρ and σ being states on a finitedimensional Hilbert space H, and Hn ' H⊗n . Explicit expressions of the type II errors defined
in Equation (1.2) and Equation (1.3) are not known even in this simple setting. However,
their behaviour in the asymptotic limit (n → ∞) is known. The asymptotic behaviour of
βn (ε) is given by the well-known quantum Stein lemma [21, 37]:
1
lim − log βn (ε) = D(ρ||σ)
n→∞ n
3
∀ ε ∈ (0, 1),
where D(ρ||σ) denotes the quantum relative entropy defined in Equation (2.6).
The asymptotic behaviour of β̃n (r) is given in terms of the so-called Hoeffding distance:
For any r > 0,
(
)
tr + log Tr(ρt σ 1−t )
1
lim − log β̃n (r) = Hr (ρ||σ) := − inf
.
n→∞ n
0≤t<1
1−t
The problem of finding error exponents can be mapped (in the i.i.d. case) to the problem
of characterizing the probability that a sum of n i.i.d. random variables makes an order-n
deviation from its mean, which is the subject of large deviations and Cramér’s theorem. In
fact, it is known that in the context of Stein’s lemma, allowing the error of type II to decay
exponentially, with a rate smaller than Stein’s exponent, D(ρkσ), the error of type I decays
exponentially, with a rate given by
α−1
[r − Dα (ρkσ)],
α
0<α<1
sup
where Dα (ρkσ) is the so-called α-Rényi divergence:
Dα (ρkσ) =
1
log Tr(ρα σ 1−α ).
α−1
If instead the error of type II is restricted to decay exponentially with a rate greater than
Stein’s exponent, the error of type I converge exponentially to 1, with a rate given by
α−1
[r − Dα∗ (ρkσ)],
α
1<α
sup
where Dα∗ (ρkσ) is the so-called Sandwiched α-Rényi divergence:
Dα∗ (ρkσ) =
1−α
1
log Tr(ρ1/2 σ α ρ1/2 )α .
α−1
These phenomena are the manifestation of a coarse-grained analysis.
A more refined analysis of the type II error exponent, (− log βn (ε)), is given by its second
order asymptotic expansion, which was derived independently by Li [30], and Tomamichel
and Hayashi [47]. It can be expressed as follows:
1
s1 (ε)
log n
log βn (ε) = − D(ρ||σ) + √ + O
,
(1.4)
n
n
n
where the second-order coefficient s1 (ε) displays a Gaussian behaviour given by
p
s1 (ε) := −Φ−1 (ε) V (ρkσ).
(1.5)
Here Φ denotes the cumulative distribution function (c.d.f.) of a standard normal distribution, and V (ρ||σ) is called the quantum information variance and is defined in Equation (2.8).
Both first order and second order asymptotics of the type II error exponent have been generalized to contexts beyond the i.i.d. setting under different conditions on the states ρn and σn
4
(see e.g. [12] and references therein). The problem of finding second order asymptotic expansions can actually be mapped (in the i.i.d. case) to the one of characterizing the probability
√
that a sum of i.i.d. random variables makes an order- n deviation from its mean, which is
the subject of small deviations and the Central Limit- and Berry Esseen Theorems.
Quantum Stein’s lemma and second order asymptotics both deal with the convergence of
the type II error when the type I error is assumed to be smaller than a pre-fixed constant
threshold value ε. However, as mentioned above, imposing the error of type II to decay exponentially with a rate smaller than Stein’s rate implies that the error of type I itself decays
exponentially. In this paper we carry out a ‘hybrid analysis’ in which we allow the error of
type I to decay sub-exponentially with n, the error exponent taking the form εn := exp(na2n ),
with {an }n∈N being a so-called moderate sequence1 . As shown in [10, 11], this problem can
be mapped (in the i.i.d. case) into the problem of characterizing the probability that a sum
of i.i.d. random variables makes an order-an deviation from its mean. This is the subject ot
moderate deviations, hence justifying the name ‘hybrid analysis’. Note that even the classical
counterpart of this analysis was done relatively recently, see e.g. [1, 41, 45].
Large, moderate and small deviations belong to the asymptotic setting. On the other hand,
relatively little is known, about the behaviour of the type II errors βn (ε) and β̃n (r) (for some
r > 0) in the case of finite blocklength, i.e. for a fixed, finite value of n. As mentioned earlier,
Audenaert, Mosonyi and Verstraete [5] considered the i.i.d. case and derived bounds on the
quantities βn (ε) and β̃n (r) in the asymmetric setting, as well as bounds on the corresponding
quantity in the symmetric setting. For example, their bounds on βn (ε) (see Theorem 3.3 and
Equation (35) of [5]) can be expressed as follows:
−f (ε) ≤ Q(n, ε) ≤ g(ε)
(1.6)
1
Q(n, ε) := √ (log βn (ε) + nD(ρkσ)) ,
n
(1.7)
where
and
√
f (ε) = 4 2 log η log(1 − ε)−1 ,
√
g(ε) = 4 2 log η log ε−1 ,
(1.8)
with η := 1 + e1/2D3/2 (ρkσ) + e−1/2D1/2 (ρkσ) .
Our contribution
Quantum hypothesis testing for uncorrelated and correlated states
In this paper, we obtain upper bounds on the optimal type II errors (namely, the Stein and
Hoeffding errors) for finite blocklength quantum hypothesis testing, in the case in which the
received state ωn is one of two states ρn and σn , where ρn and σn are each given by tensor
1
Such a sequence has the property an → 0, but
√
nan → ∞, as n → ∞.
5
products of n (not necessarily identical) states, and hence also for i.i.d. states. We also derive
similar bounds when ρn and σn satisfy the following upper-factorization property:
ρn ≤ R ρn−1 ⊗ ρ1 ,
σn ≤ S σn−1 ⊗ σ1 ,
for some
R, S ≥ 1.
This is for example the case of Gibbs states of spin chains with translation-invariant finiterange interactions, or finitely correlated states (see [16, 19]). This class of states was studied
in [20] in the asymptotic framework of Stein’s lemma (see also [33]). We also consider the
case of states satisfying a so-called lower-factorization property:
ρn ≥ R−1 ρn−1 ⊗ ρ1 ,
σn ≥ S −1 σn−1 ⊗ σ1 ,
for some
R, S > 1.
Gibbs states mentioned above, i.i.d. states and certain classes of finitely correlated states,
satisfy both these factorization properties.
In the i.i.d. case, the upper bounds that we derive for the finite blocklength regime are
tighter than the ones derived in [5], for all values of the parameter ε up to a threshold value
(which depends on ρ and σ). We also extend the recent results of [10, 11], in the moderate
deviation regime, to the case of such correlated states.
Application to classical-quantum channels
Quantum hypothesis testing is one of the fundamental building blocks of quantum information
theory since it underlies various other informetion-theoretic tasks. An important example
of such a task is the transmission of classical information through a quantum channel. In
particular, it is well-known that the analysis of information transmission through a so-called
classical-quantum (c-q) channel2 can be reduced to a hypothesis testing problem. Hence our
above results on quantum hypothesis testing can be applied to find bounds on the optimal
rates of transmission of information through c-q channels, both in the finite blocklength- and
the moderate deviations regime. Most notably, our results on hypothesis testing of correlated
quantum states (satisfying the factorization properties mentioned above) allow us to analyze
the problem of information transmission through a class of c-q channels with memory. The
latter are channels whose output states satisfy a non-homogeneous factorization property
(see Section 7 below for details). We say that such channels satisfy a channel factorization
property.
Layout of the paper
In Section 2, we introduce the necessary notations and definitions, including the two key tools
that we use, namely, relative modular operators and martingale concentration inequalities.
The finite blocklength analysis of hypothesis testing for uncorrelated quantum states is done
in Section 3 (see Theorems 5 and 6). The bounds that we obtain are compared with previously
known finite blocklength- [5] and second order asymptotic [30, 47] bounds (see Figure 1). Our
finite blocklength results on correlated states, introduced in Section 5, are given by Theorem 7
2
This amounts to the transmission of classical information through a quantum channel, under the restriction
of the encodings being product states.
6
and Corollary 1 of Section 5. Moderate deviation analysis of such states is done in Section 6
(see Theorem 9 and Corollary 2). Our results are applied to classical-quantum channels with
memory in Section 7 (see Propositions 5 and 6).
2
Notations and Definitions
Operators, states and relative modular operators
Given a finite-dimensional Hilbert space H, let B(H) denote the algebra of linear operators
acting on H and Bsa (H) ⊂ B(H) denote the set of self-adjoint operators. Let P(H) be
the set of positive semi-definite operators on H and P+ (H) ⊂ P(H) the set of (strictly)
positive operators. Further, let D(H) := {ρ ∈ P(H) | Tr ρ = 1} denote the set of density
matrices (or states) on H. We denote the support of an operator A by supp(A) and the
range of a projection operator P as ran(P ). Let I ∈ P(H) denote the identity operator on
H, and id : B(H) 7→ B(H) the identity map on P
operators on H. Any element A of Bsa (H)
has a spectral decomposition of the form A = λ∈sp(A) λ Pλ (A), where sp(A) denotes the
spectrum of A, and Pλ (A) is the projection operator corresponding to the eigenvalue λ. For
two superoperators Φ1 and Φ2 , we denote their composition Φ1 ◦ Φ2 by Φ1 Φ2 . We recall that
given two C ∗ algebras of operators A and B, an operator concave function f : R → R is such
that for any two self-adjoint operators A1 , A2 ∈ A and any λ ∈ [0, 1]:
f (λA1 + (1 − λ)A2 ) ≥ λf (A1 ) + (1 − λ)f (A2 ).
A function f : R → R is operator convex if −f is operator concave. The following operator
generalization of Jensen’s inequality will turn out very useful:
Theorem 1 (Operator Jensen inequality, see [13, 17]). Let A and B be two C ∗ -algebras, and
v : B → A a contraction. Then for any operator concave function f on (0, ∞), and any
positive element a ∈ A,
f (v ∗ av) ≥ v ∗ (f (a))v,
∀a ≥ 0.
We use the framework of relative modular operators in our proofs and intermediate results.
Relative modular operators were introduced originally by Araki. He used them to extend the
notion of relative entropy to pairs of arbitrary states on a C*-algebra (see [2, 3, 38]). The
relation between relative modular operators and Rényi divergences was studied by Petz (see
[39] and [40]). Below we briefly recall the definition and basic properties of relative modular
operators in the finite-dimensional setting. For more details see e.g. [12, 24].
Relative Modular Operators
To define relative modular operators on a finite-dimensional operator algebra B(H), we start
by equipping A ≡ B(H) with a Hilbert space structure through the Hilbert-Schmidt scalar
product, which for A, B ∈ A is given by hA, Bi := Tr(A∗ B). We define a map π : B(H) →
B(A) by π(A) : X 7→ AX, i.e. π(A) is the map acting on A by left multiplication by A.
The map π is linear, one-to-one and has in addition the properties π(AB) = π(A)π(B),
7
and π(A∗ ) = π(A)∗ , where π(A)∗ denotes the adjoint of the map π(A) defined through the
relation hX, π(A)(Y )i = hπ(A)∗ X, Y i. The following identity between operator norms holds:
kπ(A)kB(A) = kAkB(H) . Due to this identity, and the fact that π(A)X = AX, we identify A
with π(A) and simply write A for π(A) (even though π(A) is a linear map on A, and A is
not!).
For any ρ ∈ D(H), we denote Ωρ := ρ1/2 ∈ Bsa (H). We then have the identity
Tr(ρA) = hΩρ , AΩρ i
for all A ∈ A,
(2.1)
where the right-hand side of the above identity should be understood as hΩρ , π(A)Ωρ i. Equation (2.1) is nothing but a simple case of the so-called GNS representation (see e.g. Section
2.3.3 of [9]).
For simplicity of exposition, in this paper, we only consider faithful states, i.e. states ρ
for which supp(ρ) = H. Hence, for any pairs of states ρ, σ, we have supp(ρ) = supp(σ). We
then define the relative modular operator ∆σ|ρ to be the map
∆σ|ρ : A → A
A 7→ σAρ−1
(2.2)
Note that (2.2) defines ∆σ|ρ not only for ρ, σ ∈ D(H), but for any ρ, σ ∈ P+ (H).
As a linear operator on B(H), ∆σ|ρ is positive and its spectrum sp(∆σ|ρ ) consists of the
ratios of eigenvalues µ/λ, λ ∈ sp(ρ), µ ∈ sp(σ). For any x ∈ sp(∆σ|ρ ), the corresponding
spectral projection is the map
Px (∆σ|ρ ) : A →
A 7→
A
P
Pµ (σ)APλ (ρ).
(2.3)
λ∈sp(ρ), µ∈sp(σ): µ/λ=x
By von Neumann’s Spectral Theorem (see e.g. Sections VII and VIII of [43]) one can associate
a classical random variable X to any pair (Λ, Ω), where Λ is a map Λ : A → A and Ω ∈
Bsa (H), such that for any bounded measurable function f ,
Z
hΩ, f (Λ)Ωi = E[f (X)] ≡ f (x) dµ(x).
Here µ denotes the law of X and is referred to as the spectral measure of Λ with respect to
Ω. For the choice Λ = log ∆σ|ρ and Ω = Ωρ ≡ ρ1/2 , this yields
Z
hΩρ , f (log ∆σ|ρ )Ωρ i = f (x) dµσ|ρ (x) ≡ E[f (X)],
(2.4)
where X is a random variable of law µ ≡ µσ|ρ . The relation (2.4) plays a key role in our
proofs since it allows us to express the error probabilities of asymmetric hypothesis testing in
terms of probability distributions of a classical random variable, and therefore allows us to
employ the tools of classical probability theory in our analysis. Taking f to be the identity
function, we get:
E[X] = hΩρ , log ∆σ|ρ Ωρ i = −D(ρkσ),
8
(2.5)
where
D(ρkσ) := Tr ρ(log ρ − log σ)
(2.6)
is the quantum relative entropy of ρ with respect to σ. The last identity in Equation (2.5)
can be verified easily by direct computation. Similarly, by taking f to be the square function,
one can verify that
E[X 2 ] − E[X]2 = hΩρ , (log ∆σ|ρ )2 Ωρ i − D(ρkσ)2 ≡ V (ρkσ),
(2.7)
where V (ρkσ) is called the quantum information variance and is defined as follows:
V (ρkσ) := Tr ρ(log ρ − log σ)2 − D(ρkσ)2 .
(2.8)
Conditional expectations and discrete-time martingales
A discrete-time martingale is a sequence of random variables for which, at a particular time
in the realized sequence, the expectation of the next value in the sequence is equal to the
present observed value, given the knowledge of all prior observed values. More precisely, it is
defined as follows. Let (E, F, P) be a probability space, where E is a set, F is a σ-algebra on
E (which is a set of subsets of E containing the empty set, and closed under the operations
of taking the complement and discrete unions), and P is a probability measure on F. In the
case of a finite set E, F is usually the set 2E of all the subsets of Ω. Given a measurable
space (E, F), a filtration {Fn }n∈N∪{0} is a sequence of σ-algebras such that
F0 ⊆ F1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Fn · · · ⊆ F.
Given a sequence of random variables {Xn }n∈N∪{0} , we denote by σ(X1 , . . . , Xn ) the smallest
σ-algebra on which the random variables X1 , . . . , Xn are measurable, and call
{σ(X1 , . . . , Xn )}n∈N∪{0}
the natural filtration of {Xn }n∈N∪{0} . More generally a filtration {Fn }n∈N∪{0} is said to be
adapted to a sequence of random variables {Xn }n∈N∪{0} if for each n, Xn is Fn -measurable.
For a given σ-algebra G on a discrete space, a random variable X is G-measurable if it can
be written as
X
X(ω) =
xk 1Bk (ω), ω ∈ Ω,
k∈I
where I is an index set, and {Bk }k∈I is a family of disjoint subsets of G.
Consider a sub-σ-algebra G of F and an F-measurable integrable real-valued random variable
X : Ω → R, i.e.
Z
E[|X|] :=
|X(ω)| dP(ω) < ∞.
E
9
Then the conditional expectation of X with respect to G is defined as the almost surely
unique (i.e. up to a set of measure zero) integrable G-measurable real random variable Y :=
E[X|G] : E → R such that for any other bounded G-measurable random variable Z:
E[ZY ] = E[ZX].
In the case of a discrete probability space, the conditional expectation can be expressed as
follows: pick any generating family {Ak }k∈J of disjoint subsets of G, with J denoting an
index set. Then
E[X|G](ω) =
X E[X1A ]
k
1Ak (ω),
P(Ak )
ω ∈ E.
(2.9)
k∈J
The conditional expectation is a linear operation. Moreover, it is easy to verify from Equation (2.9) that for any integrable random variable X and sub-σ-algebra G,
(
X
if X is G-measurable
E[X|G] =
(2.10)
E[X] if X is independent of G.
Let {Fn }n∈N∪{0} be a filtration of F and suppose we are given a sequence of real-valued
random variables {Xn }n∈N∪{0} such that for each n, Xn is integrable and Fn -measurable.
Then {Xn , Fn }n∈N∪{0} is said to be a martingale if for each n ∈ N ∪ {0},3
E[Xn+1 |Fn ] = Xn a.s.
Similarly, {Xn , Fn }n∈N∪{0} is said to be a super-martingale if for each n ∈ N ∪ {0},
E[Xn+1 |Fn ] ≤ Xn a.s.
and a sub-martingale if for each n ∈ N ∪ {0},
E[Xn+1 |Fn ] ≥ Xn a.s.
Example 1. Perhaps the simplest example of a martingale is the sum of independent
integrable centered random variables. Indeed, let {Xn }P
n∈N be such a sequence, {Fn :=
σ(X1 , . . . , Xn )}n∈N its natural filtration and define Yn = nk=1 Xk . Then
E[Yn+1 |Fn ] =
=
n+1
X
k=1
n
X
E[Xk |Fn ] =
n
X
E[Xk |Fn ] + E[Xn+1 |Fn ]
k=1
Xk + E[Xn+1 ] = Yn + 0 = Yn ,
k=1
where in the first line we used the linearity of the conditional expectation, and in line two
we used both identities of Equation (2.10). Therefore {Yn , Fn }n∈N∪{0} is a martingale, where
Y0 = 0.
3
a.s.= almost surely
10
Martingale concentration inequalities
Roughly speaking, the concentration of measure phenomenon can be stated in the following
way [46]: “A random variable that depends in a smooth way on many independent random
variables (but not too much on any of them) is essentially constant”. This means that such a
random variable, X, concentrates around its mean (or median) in a way that the probability
of the event {|X − E[X]| > t} decays exponentially in t ≥ 0. For more details on the theory
of concentration of measure see [29].
Several techniques have been developed so far to prove concentration inequalities. The
method that we focus on here is the martingale approach (see e.g. [8], [42] Chapter 2 and references therein). The Azuma-Hoeffding inequality has been often used to prove concentration
phenomena for discrete-time martingales whose jumps are almost surely bounded. Hoeffding
[22] proved this inequality for a sum of independent and bounded random variables, and
Azuma [6] later extended it to martingales with bounded differences.
Theorem 2 (Azuma-Hoeffding inequality). Let {Xk , Fk }k∈N∪{0} be a discrete-parameter realvalued super-martingale. Suppose that for every k ∈ {1, . . . , n} the condition |Xk −Xk−1 | ≤ dk
holds a.s. for a real-valued sequence {dk }nk=1 of non-negative numbers. Then for every α ≥ 0,
α2
P(Xn − X0 ≥ α) ≤ exp − Pn
.
(2.11)
2 k=1 d2k
The next result from [31] (see also [42] Corollary 2.3.2) provides an improvement over the
Azuma-Hoeffding inequality in the limit of large n, in the case in which dk = d for any k, by
making use of the variance.
Theorem 3. Let {Xk , Fk }k∈N∪{0} be a discrete-parameter real-valued super-martingale. Assume that, for some constants 0 < ν < d the following two inequalities are satisfied almost
surely:
Xk − E[Xk |Fk−1 ] ≤ d
E[(Xk − E[Xk |Fk−1 ])2 |Fk−1 ] ≤ ν 2
for every k ∈ {1, . . . , n}. Then for every κ ≥ 0,
δ+γ
γ
P(Xn − X0 ≥ κn) ≤ exp −nDbin
,
1+γ 1+γ
where
γ :=
ν2
< 1,
d2
δ :=
κ
d
and Dbin (.k.) here denotes the binary classical relative entropy:
p
1−p
Dbin (pkq) := p log
+ (1 − p) log
,
q
1−q
If δ > 1 then these probabilities are equal to zero.
11
p, q ∈ [0, 1].
(2.12)
To see why (2.12) is indeed an improvement over the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality (2.11)
in the limit of large n (in the case in which dk = d for any k), use the following identity,
which is obtained by a Taylor expansion of log(1 + u):
(1 + u) log(1 + u) = u +
X (−u)k
,
k(k − 1)
− 1 < u ≤ 1.
k≥2
Then it follows that
n X
δ+γ
γ
1
=
nDbin
δk
1+γ 1+γ
1+γ
k(k − 1)
1
1− −
γ
k≥2
=
δ2n
2γ
k−1 !
+ O δ3n .
The first term leads to an improvement by a factor of
(2.11).
(2.13)
1
γ
over the Azuma-Hoeffding bound
In the special case of a martingale of the form given in Example 1, the following concentration inequality was proved by Kearns and Saul [28]. It is a refinement of the well-known
Hoeffding inequality [22] and its proof is analogous to the proof of the latter. We employ it
in our analysis of quantum hypothesis testing for the case of uncorrelated states (see Section 3.3). Note that for Example 1, the Hoeffding inequality, and hence also the Kearn-Saul
inequality, provide an improvement over the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality.
Theorem 4. [Kearns-Saul inequality] Let {Xk }k∈N∪{0} be independent real-valued bounded
random variables, such
Pthat for every k ∈ {1, . . . , n}, Xk ∈ [ak , bk ] holds a.s. for constants
ak , bk ∈ R. Let µn := nk=1 E[Xk ]. Then for every α ≥ 0
!
n
X
√
α2 n
P
P
Xk − µn ≤ −α n ≤ exp −
,
4 nk=1 ck
k=1
where
(1 − 2pk )(bk − ak )2
k
4 log 1−p
pk
ck :=
2
(bk − ak )
8
if pk 6=
1
2
1
if pk = ,
2
where pk is defined as
pk :=
E[Xk ] − ak
,
bk − ak
k ∈ {1, . . . , n}.
This indeed improves Hoeffding’s inequality unless pk =
12
1
2
for all k ∈ {1, . . . , n}.
3
3.1
Hypothesis testing via martingale methods
Finite blocklength analysis of the Type II error exponent
Let us fix a sequence of finite dimensional Hilbert spaces {Hn }n∈N , and let {ρn }n∈N and
{σn }n∈N denote two sequences of states, where for each n ∈ N, ρn , σn ∈ D(Hn ). For a test
0 ≤ Tn ≤ In , the Type I and Type II errors for the corresponding binary quantum hypothesis
testing problem are given by
α(Tn ) = Tr[(In − Tn )ρn ]
and
β(Tn ) = Tr[Tn σn ].
As mentioned in the introduction, in the context of asymmetric hypothesis testing, the two
quantities of interest are the Stein error and the Hoeffding error, defined through Equation (1.2) and Equation (1.3), respectively. In this section we obtain bounds on these errors
for finite blocklength, i.e. for finite values of n, for uncorrelated states, that is when ρn and
σn are each given by a tensor product of n (not necessarily identical) states.
Remark 1. We restrict our consideration to the case of faithful states ρn , σn only to make
our exposition more transparent. Simple limiting arguments show that all our results remain
valid in the case in which supp(ρn ) ⊆ supp(σn ).
In fact, our upper bounds on the Stein- and Hoeffding errors, as given in Lemma 1, are
valid when the sequences {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N satisfy Condition 1 given below.
Condition 1. The states ρn , σn ∈ D(Hn ) of the sequences {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N are such
that the random variables Y0 = 0 and Yn := Xn +D(ρn kσn ), where Xn is the random variable
associated to the pair (log ∆σn |ρn , Ωρn ) through Equation (2.4), form a super-martingale with
respect to their natural filtration. Moreover, there exists a sequence {dk }k∈N of non-negative
numbers such that for any k ≥ 1, |Yk − Yk−1 | ≤ dk almost surely i.e. with probability 1.
Remark 2. One can readily verify that E[Xn ] = −D(ρn kσn ), so that Yn is a centered random
variable, for each n ∈ N.
As shown below, uncorrelated states satisfy the above condition. Later in the paper, we
show how a refined analysis allows us to recover similar results for certain classes of correlated
states, i.e. those satisfying a so-called factorization property (see Sections 4 and 5).
Our upper bounds on the finite blocklength Stein- and Hoeffding errors are stated in the
following lemma:
Lemma 1 (Upper bounds on finite blocklength optimal asymmetric error exponent). Let
{ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N be two sequences of states that satisfy Condition 1. Then for any ε > 0
there exists a sequence of tests {Tnε }n∈N such that for any n ∈ N,
v
u
n
X
u
α(Tnε ) ≤ ε,
β(Tnε ) ≤ exp −D(ρn kσn ) + t2 log(1/ε)
d2k .
k=1
Moreover, for any r > 0, there exists a sequence of tests {T̃nr }n∈N such that for each n ∈ N,
v
u
n
X
u
α(T̃nr ) ≤ e−nr ,
β(T̃nr ) ≤ exp −D(ρn kσn ) + t2nr
d2k .
k=1
13
Hence, for each n ∈ N,
v
u n
u X
βn (ε) ≤ exp −D(ρn ||σn ) + t2
d2k log(1/ε)
(3.1)
k=1
v
u
n
X
u
β̃n (r) ≤ exp −D(ρn ||σn ) + t2nr
d2k .
(3.2)
k=1
In order to prove Lemma 1, we use the Azuma-Hoeffding martingale concentration inequality (Theorem 2) as well as the following result, which allows us to relate the error
probabilities arising in asymmetric quantum hypothesis testing to laws of classical supermartingales. The latter result was stated as Proposition 1 in [12] but its proof is essentially
due to Li [30].
Proposition 1. [12] Let ρ, σ be two states in D(H). For any L > 0 there exists a test T
such that
Tr ρ(1 − T ) ≤ Ωρ , P[− log L,∞) (log ∆σ|ρ ) Ωρ
and
Tr σT ≤ L−1 ,
(3.3)
P
where P[− log L,∞) (log ∆σ|ρ ) := x∈[− log L,∞) Px (log ∆σ|ρ ), with Px (log ∆σ|ρ ) being the spectral
projection operator of log ∆σ|ρ of associated eigenvalue x.
For the proof of this proposition, see [12]. The proof actually provides a construction of
the tests {Tnε }n∈N and {T̃nr }n∈N appearing in Lemma 1.
Proof of Lemma 1
For n ∈ N, fix 0 < Ln ≤ eD(ρn kσn ) . Then by (3.3), there exists a test Tn such that
α(Tn ) ≤ hΩρn , P[− log Ln ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i
and
β(Tn ) ≤ L−1
n .
Now
hΩρn , P[− log Ln ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i = hΩρn , 1[− log Ln ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i
= E 1[− log Ln ,∞) (Xn )
= P(Xn ≥ − log Ln ) = P(Yn ≥ − log Ln + D(ρn kσn )).
where Xn is the random variable associated to the pair (log ∆σn |σn , Ωρn ), and Yn := Xn +
D(ρn kσn ). Assuming that Condition 1 is satisfied, an application of Theorem 2 to the supermartingale {Yk , Fk }k∈N∪{0} with Y0 = 0, where {Fk }k∈N is the natural filtration associated
with the random variables Xk , yields the following:
α(Tn ) ≤ P Yn − Y0 ≥ D(ρn kσn ) − log Ln
(D(ρn kσn ) − log Ln )2
P
≤ exp −
.
(3.4)
2 nk=1 d2k
14
Setting the quantity on the right hand side of the above inequality to be equal to ε, and using
the fact that log Ln ≤ D(ρn kσn ), we find that
v
u
n
X
u
t
log Ln = D(ρn kσn ) − 2 log(1/ε)
d2k .
k=1
This implies that
v
u
n
X
u
= exp −D(ρn kσn ) + t2 log(1/ε)
d2k ,
β(Tn ) ≤ L−1
n
k=1
from which (3.1) follows since βn (ε) ≤ β(Tn ). The inequality (3.2) can be derived analogously
by following the same steps as above but replacing ε by e−nr .
3.2
A lower bound on the second order asymptotics of the Type II error
exponent
As yet another application of a martingale concentration inequality in quantum hypothesis
testing, we obtain a lower bound on the second order asymptotics of the type II error exponent, − log βn (ε), for the case in which the states ρn , σn occurring in the sequence satisfy
the more constrained Condition 2. The lower bound is given in Proposition 2. In particular,
Condition 2 can be readily verified to be satisfied when ρn and σn are of the tensor product
form.
Condition 2. The states ρn and σn of states on each Hn are such that the random variables
Y0 = 0 and Yn := Xn + D(ρn kσn ), where Xn is the random variable associated to the pair
(log ∆σn |ρn , Ωρn ), form a super-martingale with respect to their natural filtration. Moreover,
assume that for some constants d and ν the following two requirements are satisfied almost
surely:
Yk − E[Yk |Fk−1 ] ≤ d
E[(Yk − E[Yk |Fk−1 ])2 |Fk−1 ] ≤ ν 2 .
Proposition 2. Suppose that the sequences of states {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N satisfy Condition 2. Then for any sequence {Ln }n∈N of positive numbers such that for any n ∈ N,
D(ρn kσn ) ≥ log Ln , there exists a sequence of tests {Tn }n∈N such that for any n ∈ N the type
I and type II errors satisfy the following inequalities:
δn + γ
γ
α(Tn ) ≤ exp −nDbin
,
1+γ 1+γ
β(Tn ) ≤ L−1
n ,
(3.5)
where γ = ν 2 /d2 and for each n, δn = (D(ρn kσn ) − log Ln ) /nd. This implies that for any
0 < ε < 1:
p
− log βn (ε) ≥ D(ρn kσn ) − 2n log(ε−1 )ν + O(1).
(3.6)
15
Proof. The first part of the proof of this proposition is similar to the proof of Lemma 1 and
follows from a simple use of Theorem 3 as well as Proposition 1. Using (2.13), one derives
the following asymptotic upper bound for α(Tn ):
(D(ρn kσn ) − log Ln )3
(D(ρn kσn ) − log Ln )2 1
+O
.
α(Tn ) ≤ exp −
n
2ν 2
n2
p
Fix 0 < ε < 1. Choosing log Ln = D(ρn kσn ) − 2n log ε−1 ν, the last inequality can be
simplified:
1
1
α(Tn ) ≤ exp log ε + O √
=ε+O √
.
n
n
This implies, by a suitable use of Taylor expansion, that
p
− log βn (ε) ≥ D(ρn kσn ) − 2n log(ε)−1 ν + O(1).
3.3
Example: the case of uncorrelated quantum states
In this section we consider the case in which {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N are sequences of independent (i.e. uncorrelated) states. We show that in this case Condition 1 holds, and hence
Lemma 1 can be applied. We also show that in this case, a tighter concentration inequality
than the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality of Theorem 2 provides better upper bounds on the
Stein- and Hoeffding errors.
Suppose that the sequences {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N are such that for each n, ρn and σn are of
the following tensor product form:
ρn = ρ̃1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ ρ̃n
vs
σn = σ̃1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ σ̃n ,
where for each k ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n}, ρ̃k , σ̃k ∈ D(H̃k ), where H̃k is a finite-dimensional Hilbert
space. In this case,
log ∆σn |ρn =
n
X
id⊗k−1 ⊗ log ∆σ̃k |ρ̃k ⊗ id⊗n−k .
k=1
As all the terms in the sum in the above identity commute, one finds by functional calculus
that for any u ∈ R,
e
iu log ∆σn |ρn
=
n
Y
exp iu id⊗k−1 ⊗ log ∆σ̃k |ρ̃k ⊗ id⊗n−k .
k=1
This in turn implies that the random variable Xn has characteristic function
n
n
h
i
Y
Y
iuXn
iu log ∆ρ̃k |σ̃k
iu log ∆σn |ρn
= hΩρn , e
(Ωρn )i =
hΩρ̃k , e
(Ωρ̃k )i =
E eiuX̃k ,
E e
k=1
16
k=1
where for each 1 ≤ k ≤ n, X̃k is a random variable associated to the pair (log ∆σ̃k |ρ̃k , Ωρ̃k ).
P
The random variable Xn has the same distribution as the sum Xn = nk=1 X̃k of independent
random variables X̃k , which in turn implies that the random variable Xn − E[Xn ] = Xn +
D(ρn kσn ) has the same distribution as
n
X
X̃k − E[X̃k ] =
k=1
n
X
X̃k + D(ρ̃k kσ̃k ).
k=1
Hence,
P without loss of generality, the random variable Yn appearing in Condition 1 is equal
to nk=1 X̃k + D(ρ̃k kσ̃k ). Now {Yn , Fn }n∈N∪{0} is a martingale of the form of Example 1,
where Fn = σ(X̃k , k ≤ n). Moreover the random variables Yk − Yk−1 := X̃k + D(ρ̃k kσ̃k ) are
bounded by
dk := k log ∆σ̃k |ρ̃k + D(ρ̃k kσ̃k )k∞ .
(3.7)
This analysis leads to the following corollary of Lemma 1:
Theorem 5 (Upper bounds for uncorrelated states). States of the form
ρn = ρ̃1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ ρ̃n
and
σn = σ̃1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ σ̃n
(3.8)
on a Hilbert space H̃1 ⊗· · ·⊗H̃n satisfy Condition 1. Therefore, they satisfy the bounds given in
(3.1) and (3.2) on the error exponents of type II with coefficients dk given by Equation (3.7).
More precisely, for any ε > 0 there exists a sequence of tests {Tnε }n∈N such that for any n ∈ N
v
u
n
X
u
α(Tnε ) ≤ ε,
β(Tnε ) ≤ exp −D(ρn kσn ) + t2 log(1/ε)
d2k .
k=1
Similarly, for any r > 0, there exists a sequence of tests {T̃nr }n∈N such that for each n ∈ N:
v
u
n
X
u
d2k ,
α(T̃nr ) ≤ e−nr ,
β(T̃nr ) ≤ exp −D(ρn kσn ) + t2nr
k=1
This implies that for each n ∈ N:
v
u n
u X
βn (ε) ≤ exp −D(ρn ||σn ) + t2
d2k log(1/ε)
(3.9)
k=1
v
u
n
X
u
β̃n (r) ≤ exp −D(ρn ||σn ) + t2nr
d2k .
(3.10)
k=1
In this special case of a sum of independent random variables, we can use the tighter
concentration inequality, namely the Kearns-Saul inequality (Theorem 4) to get better bounds
than the ones given in Theorem 5. This yields:
17
Theorem 6 (Improved upper bounds for uncorrelated states). Let {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N
two sequences of states of the form given in Equation (3.8). Then for any ε > 0 there exists
a sequence of tests {Tnε }n∈N such that, for any n ∈ N,
v
u
n
X
u
α(Tnε ) ≤ ε,
β(Tnε ) ≤ exp −D(ρn kσn ) + t4 log(1/ε)
ck ,
k=1
where the constants ck are given by
(1 − 2pk )(bk − ak )2
k
4 log 1−p
pk
ck :=
2
(bk − ak )
8
with ak , bk and pk defined as
λmax (σ̃k )
ak := log
,
λmin (ρ̃k )
bk := log
λmin (σ̃k )
λmax (ρ̃k )
if pk 6=
1
2
(3.11)
1
if pk = ,
2
,
pk :=
−D(ρ̃k kσ̃k ) − ak
.
bk − ak
Similarly, for any r > 0, there exists a sequence of tests {T̃nr }n∈N such that for each n ∈ N:
√ Pn
α(T̃nr ) ≤ e−nr ,
β(T̃nr ) ≤ e−D(ρn kσn )+ 4nr k=1 ck ,
This implies that for each n ∈ N:
v
u
n
X
u
ck
βn (ε) ≤ exp −D(ρn ||σn ) + t4 log(ε−1 )
(3.12)
k=1
v
u
n
X
u
β̃n (r) ≤ exp −D(ρn ||σn ) + t4nr
ck .
(3.13)
k=1
3.3.1
Reduction to the i.i.d. case
Theorem 5 gives upper bounds on the Stein- and Hoeffding errors for uncorrelated states.
In the case of i.i.d. states (ρ⊗n vs. σ ⊗n ), the bound corresponding to the Stein error (3.9)
reduces to
1
1
log βn (ε) ≤ −D(ρkσ) + √ h(ε),
n
n
(3.14)
where
h(ε) :=
p
2 log ε−1 k log ∆σ|ρ + D(ρkσ)k∞
(3.15)
Taking the limit on both sides, the result is in accordance with quantum Stein’s lemma:
1
lim − βn (ε) = D(ρkσ).
n
n→∞
18
As mentioned in the introduction, in the i.i.d. case, the authors of [30, 47] moreover showed
that
p
− log βn (ε) = nD(ρkσ) + nV (ρkσ)Φ−1 (ε) + O(log n)
(3.16)
where V (ρkσ) is the quantum information variance defined in Equation (2.8), and Φ is the
cumulative distribution function of a standard Gaussian random variable. In fact, Li’s proof
is very similar to our proof of Lemma 1, as he was the first to prove an i.i.d. version of
Proposition 1 which was later on adapted to fit non i.i.d. settings in [12]. This result coupled
to a Central limit theorem (or more precisely a refinement of it called the Berry Esseen
theorem) were the two main ingredients of the proof of (3.16). This equation shows that the
correct order of the deviation of n1 log βn (ε) from −D(ρkσ) is indeed √1n (at least for ε 6= 1/2).
More precisely, (3.16) implies that
p
√
1
lim sup n
log βn (ε) + D(ρkσ) = − V (ρkσ)Φ−1 (ε)
(3.17)
n
n→∞
This implies that for all ε ∈ [0, 1] and all 1 ≥ ε0 > ε there exist infinitely many n ∈ N for
which
p
√
1
n
log βn (ε) + D(ρkσ) ≥ − V (ρkσ)Φ−1 (ε0 )
n
Using (3.14) this imposes that for all ε0 > ε
p
p
2 log ε−1 k log ∆σ|ρ + D(ρkσ)k∞ ≥ − V (ρkσ)Φ−1 (ε0 ).
(3.18)
As pointed out in [5], the negative sign on the right hand side of (3.18) is justified by the fact
that, for ε < 1/2, the right hand side is itself negative. Moreover, to prove (3.18) it suffices
to show that for any 0 < ε < 1/2,
k log ∆σ|ρ + D(ρkσ)k∞
Φ−1 (ε)
p
≥ −p
.
V (ρkσ)
2 log ε−1
Let us focus on the right hand side of the above equation. By the Gaussian concentration
inequality (see e.g. [8] Theorem 5.6),
Φ(x) ≤ e−x
2 /2
,
setting x = Φ−1 (ε), we hence infer that for any 0 < ε < 1/2,
ε ≤ exp −(Φ−1 (ε))2 /2 ,
which in turn implies that
−Φ−1 (ε) ≤
p
2 log ε−1 .
Hence, the inequality (3.18) holds provided
p
V (ρkσ) ≤ k log ∆σ|ρ + D(ρkσ)k∞ ,
19
(3.19)
which can easily be verified as follows:
V (ρkσ) = hΩρ , (log ∆σ|ρ + D(ρkσ)id)2 (Ωρ )i
≤ k log ∆σ|ρ + D(ρkσ)idk2∞
Our theorems should finally be compared with the results of [5] where similar bounds have
been derived in the i.i.d. setting using different techniques. For example, as already mentioned in the introduction, for the Stein error, it was shown in [5] that (see Theorem 3.3 and
Equation (35) of [5]):
f (ε)
1
g(ε)
−D(ρkσ) − √ ≤ log βn (ε) ≤ −D(ρkσ) + √ ,
n
n
n
(3.20)
where
√
f (ε) = 4 2 log η log(1 − ε)−1 ,
√
g(ε) = 4 2 log η log ε−1
(3.21)
and η := 1 + e1/2D3/2 (ρkσ) + e−1/2D1/2 (ρkσ) . The upper bound in (3.20) was found via semidefinite programming, the use of a bound on the optimal error probability in symmetric hypothesis testing in terms of the α-Rényi divergence (originally derived in [4]), and an inequality
relating the α-Rényi divergence of the states ρ and σ to their relative entropy. The lower
bound was derived using the monotonicity of the α-Rényi divergence under completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP) maps, the CPTP map here being the measurement channel
associated to any given test.
Our bound, given in (3.14), is tighter than the corresponding upper bound obtained in [5]
(given by (3.20) and (3.21)) for ε ≤ ε0 , where
!
k log ∆σ|ρ + D(ρkσ)k2∞
,
ε0 := exp −
16(log η)2
as the dependence of h on ε is given by the square root of log ε−1 , whereas g behaves as
log ε−1 .
In fact, Theorem 6 yields a bound which is tighter than (3.14) and is given by
1
h̃(ε)
log βn (ε) ≤ −D(ρkσ) + √ ,
n
n
where
h̃(ε) :=
p
4c log(ε−1 ),
(3.22)
and c is defined as follows:
(1 − 2p)(b − a)2
4 log 1−p
p
c :=
2
(b − a)
8
20
if p 6=
1
2
(3.23)
1
if p = ,
2
with
a := log
λmax (σ)
λmin (ρ)
,
b := log
λmin (σ)
λmax (ρ)
,
p :=
−D(ρkσ) − a
.
b−a
The above bound is tighter than (3.20) for all ε ≤ ε̃0 , where
c2
,
ε̃0 := exp −
8(log η)2
where η is given below (3.21).
Finally, one can also compare the asymptotic bound of (3.6) for the i.i.d. case to (3.16).
In this case, with the notations of Condition 2,
E[(Yk − E[Yk |Fk−1 ])2 |Fk−1 ] = E[(Yk − Yk−1 )2 |Fk−1 ] = E[(X̃k + D(ρkσ))2 |Fk−1 ]
= E[(X̃ + D(ρkσ))2 ] = E[X̃ 2 ] − D(ρkσ)2 = V (ρkσ).
where X̃ and the X̃k ’s are independent, identically distributed random variables of law µσ|ρ ,
p
the last identity arising from Equation (2.7). Hence, (3.6) holds with ν = V (ρkσ) and can
be expressed as follows:
p
2 log(ε−1 )V (ρkσ)
1
1
√
log βn (ε) ≤ −D(ρkσ) +
.
(3.24)
+O
n
n
n
From (3.19),
s2 (ε) :=
p
p
2 log(ε−1 )V (ρkσ) ≥ −Φ−1 (ε) V (ρkσ) ≡ s1 (ε),
(3.25)
which implies that for n large enough, the asymptotic bound (3.24) is looser than the one
given by (1.4). Figure 1 shows an example for which our bounds are significantly closer to
the second-order asymptotic behaviour (given by s1 (ε)) than the original upper bound of [5]
for ε < ε̃0 , ε0 .
21
Rates
2
g(ϵ)
h(ϵ)
˜
h(ϵ)
1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
ϵ
-1
s2 (ϵ)
s1 (ϵ)
-f(ϵ)
-2
Figure 1: Bounds on the function Q(n, ε) (given by Equation (1.7)) for a pair of randomly
generated qubit states ρ and σ; here ρ has Bloch vector (−0.177483, 0.365807, 0.291007)
whereas σ has Bloch vector (−0.452239, −0.141906, −0.159193). The functions g and f (defined in (3.21)) correspond to the finite blocklength bounds found in [5]; h (defined in (3.15))
corresponds to the bound given in Theorem 5, and h̃ (defined in (3.22)) corresponds to the
tighter bound given in Theorem 6. The functions s1 and s2 (cf. (3.25)) correspond to the
second-order asymptotic behaviours stated in Equation (3.16) and in (3.24), respectively.
4
Correlated states and factorization properties
In the last section, we derived bounds on the optimal type II errors in asymmetric hypothesis
testing for uncorrelated states. In the reminder of this paper, we extend these results to a
particular class of correlated states, which satisfy a so-called factorization property described
below. As an application of this, we obtain bounds on the capacities of certain classes of
classical-quantum channels with memory.
Let H be a finite dimensional Hilbert space, and define a family {ρn }n∈N of states such that
for each n, ρn ∈ D(H⊗n ). We say that the family {ρn }n∈N satisfies a (non-homogeneous)
upper (lower) factorization property if there exists an auxiliary family {ρ̃k }k∈N of states on
D(H) and a constant R > 0 such that for each n ≥ 1,
ρn ≤ R ρn−1 ⊗ ρ̃n
ρn ≥ R
−1
ρn−1 ⊗ ρ̃n
upper factorization
(4.1)
lower factorization.
(4.2)
The homogeneous case, where for each n, ρ̃n = ρ, for some fixed state ρ ∈ D(H) was first
studied in [19, 20], where asymptotic results in the context of symmetric and asymmetric
quantum hypothesis testing were derived for such families of states. Obviously, uncorrelated
states satisfy lower and upper factorization, with R = 1. Gibbs states of translation-invariant
finite-range interactions were shown to satisfy both lower and upper homogeneous factorization properties for R > 1 (see [19] Lemma 4.2). Similarly, finitely correlated states, as defined
22
in [16], were shown to satisfy a homogeneous upper factorization property as well, as a homogeneous lower factorization in some cases (see [19] Proposition 4.4 and Example 4.6). The
reason for introducing the non-homogeneous extension will become clear in Section 7.
An example of a family of states satisfying non-homogeneous upper factorization is provided by extending the definition in [16] of finitely correlated states as follows: suppose given
a spin chain with one-site algebra A ⊂ B(H), and let B be a C ∗ -subalgebra of B(K), for some
finite dimensional Hilbert spaces H and K, {En }n∈N a family of completely positive, unital
(CPU) maps En : A ⊗ B → B, and ρ a faithful state on B. Assume further that for any n ∈ N,
TrA En∗ (ρ) = ρ,
where En∗ : B → A ⊗ B stands for the pre-adjoint map of E. Construct then the family
{τn }n∈N of states on A⊗n ⊗ B as follows:
τ1 := E1∗ (ρ),
⊗ En∗ ) ◦ ... ◦ (idA ⊗ E2∗ ) ◦ E1∗ (ρ),
τn := (id⊗n−1
A
n = 2, 3, ...
To obtain a family of reduced states on the spin chain, we then trace out the auxiliary system
B:
ρn := TrB τn .
In this case, we say that (B, {En }n∈N , ρ) is a generating triple for the family ρn . In the special
case in which En := E for each n, where E : A ⊗ B → B is a given CPU map, the states ρn are
the so-called finitely correlated states and provide a non-commutative generalization of the
notion of (homogeneous) Markov chains. For the same reason, the above construction can
be viewed as an extension of non-homogeneous Markov chains to the quantum setting.
Proposition 3. Non-homogeneous finitely correlated states satisfy the upper factorization
property (4.1), with ρ̃n := TrB En∗ (ρ) and R > 1.
The proof of Proposition 3 follows very closely the one for homogeneous finitely correlated
states as given in Proposition 4.4 of [19]. For sake of completeness, we give a proof of it in
Appendix B.
In a similar fashion as [19], one can provide an example of non-homogeneous finitely correlated states satisfying the lower factorization property. To do so, assume that B is a
commutative algebra. Therefore it is isomorphic to the algebra F(X ) : {f : X → C} of
complex-valued functions on some finite set X . F(X ) is generated by the Dirac densities δx ,
x ∈ X . Then, any CPTP map E∗ : B → A ⊗ B can be specified by its values on the functions
δx , and E∗ (δx ) can be uniquely decomposed in the form
X
E∗ (δx ) =
Txy ρxy ⊗ δy ,
(4.3)
y
where {Txy : y ∈ X } forms a probability distribution on X and ρxy are states on A. The
following lemma was proved in [19] (see Example 4.6).
23
Lemma 2. Let E∗ : B → A ⊗ B of the form given by Equation (4.3), and Φ : B → B,
Φ(b) = Tr(ρb)IB . There exists R > 0 such that E∗ − R(E∗ ◦ Φ∗ ) is completely positive if and
only if
T >0
and
supp ρxy = supp ρzy
∀x, y, z ∈ X .
(4.4)
The following result is hence a direct consequence of Lemma 2:
Proposition 4. Let B a commutative algebra with associated set X , and let {ρn }n∈N be
a family ofPnon-homogeneous finitely correlated states with generating triple (B, {E}n∈N , ρ),
where ρ ≡ x∈X ρx δx . If for each n, En∗ satisfies the conditions (4.4), then
P {ρn }n∈N satisfies
the non-homogeneous lower factorization property (4.2), with ρ̃n :=
x∈X ρx En∗ (δx ) and
R > 0.
The proof of this proposition follows exactly the same lines as the proof of Proposition 3,
given in Appendix B, where the inequality comes from the fact that, by Lemma 2, there
exists R > 0 such that En∗ − R(En∗ ◦ Φ∗ ) is completely positive for each n.
5
Finite blocklength hypothesis testing for correlated states
In this section we derive finite blocklength bounds on the optimal type II errors in the case
of sequences of correlated states. In order to do so, we use a variant of the proof of the
Azuma-Hoeffding inequality, as well as the framework developed by Petz in [40] where the
monotonicity of the relative entropy is derived using the operator Jensen inequality [13, 17].
Again we fix a sequence of finite dimensional Hilbert spaces {H⊗n }n∈N and let {ρn }n∈N and
{σn }n∈N denote two sequences of states, where for each n ∈ N, ρn , σn ∈ D(H⊗n ). Assume,
moreover, that these sequences satisfy the (homogeneous) upper-factorization property: there
exists R > 0 such that
ρn ≤ R ρn−1 ⊗ ρ1 ,
σn ≤ R σn−1 ⊗ σ1 ,
n > 1.
(5.1)
Theorem 7. Given two sequences of states {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N satisfying the upper factorization property (5.1), with R ≥ 1, the following bounds hold for any 0 ≤ ε ≤ 1,
√
(
2
n −1
e−nD(ρ1 kσ1 )+c 2n log(R ε )
if ε ≥ Rn e−nc /2 ,
βn (ε) ≤
2
n −1
e−nD(ρ1 kσ1 )+nc /2+log(R ε )
else,
where c := k log ∆σ1 kρ1 + D(ρ1 kσ1 )idk. Similarly,
√
(
e−nD(ρ1 kσ1 )+nc 2(r+log R)
β̃n (r) ≤
2
e−n(D(ρ1 kσ1 )−c /2−r−log R)
if r ≤ c2 /2 − log R,
else.
1/2
Proof. As before, Ωn := ρn , n ∈ N. Now for each n ∈ N, define the map Vn−1 :
B(H⊗n )(Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ) → B(H⊗n )Ωρn by
Vn−1 (Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )) = R−1/2 Xn Ωρn ,
24
∀Xn ∈ B(H⊗n ).
(5.2)
In particular, for Xn := In , we have
Vn−1 (Ωn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ) = R−1/2 Ωρn .
(5.3)
One can verify that Vn−1 is a contraction: for any Xn ∈ B(H⊗n ),
hVn−1 (Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )), Vn−1 (Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ))i = R−1 hXn Ωρn , Xn Ωρn i
= R−1 Tr(Xn ρn Xn∗ )
≤ Tr(Xn (ρn−1 ⊗ ρ1 )Xn∗ )
(5.4)
= hXn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )i,
where the inequality (5.4) follows from the upper factorization property (5.1). Moreover, for
any Xn ∈ B(H⊗n ),
hVn−1 (Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), ∆σn |ρn Vn−1 (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )i = R−1 hXn Ωρn , ∆σn |ρn Xn Ωρn i
= R−1 Tr(σn Xn Xn∗ )
≤ Tr((σn−1 ⊗ σ1 )Xn Xn∗ )
(5.5)
= hXn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), ∆σn−1 ⊗σ1 |ρn−1 ⊗ρ1 (Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ))i,
where again, the inequality (5.5) follows from the upper factorization property (5.1). Hence,
on B(H⊗n )(Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ),
∗
Vn−1
∆σn |ρn Vn−1 ≤ ∆σn−1 ⊗σ1 |ρn−1 ⊗ρ1 = ∆σn−1 |ρn−1 ⊗ ∆σ1 |ρ1 .
(5.6)
Fix 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 and λ ∈ R. By functional calculus, we obtain the following Markov-like
inequality:
P[λ,∞) (log(∆σn |ρn )) = P[eλt ,∞) (∆tσn |ρn ) ≤ e−λt ∆tσn |ρn .
(5.7)
Further, using (5.1),
hΩρn , ∆tσn |ρn (Ωρn )i = R hVn−1 (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), ∆tσn |ρn Vn−1 (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )i
∗
= R h(Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), Vn−1
∆tσn |ρn Vn−1 (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )i
∗
≤ R h(Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), (Vn−1
∆σn |ρn Vn−1 )t (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )i
≤ R h(Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), (∆σn−1 |ρn−1 ⊗ ∆σ1 |ρ1 )t (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )i
= R hΩρn−1 , ∆tσn−1 |ρn−1 (Ωσn−1 )ihΩρ1 , ∆tσ1 |ρ1 (Ωρ1 )i,
(5.8)
where the third line follows from Theorem 1 and the operator concavity of x 7→ xt , and the
fourth line follows from the operator monotonicity of x 7→ xt for t ∈ [0, 1] as well as (5.6).
By iterating (5.8) n − 1 times, we obtain:
hΩρn , ∆tσn |ρn (Ωρn )i ≤ Rn hΩρ1 , ∆tσ1 |ρ1 (Ωρ1 )in = Rn hΩρ1 , et(log(∆σ1 |ρ1 )) (Ωρ1 )in
= Rn e−ntD(ρ1 kσ1 ) hΩρ1 , et(log(∆σ1 |ρ1 )+D(ρ1 kσ1 )) (Ωρ1 )in .
Now due to the convexity of the exponential function, we directly get that:
ets ≤
1 tc
1 tc
e − e−tc s +
e + e−tc
2c
2
25
− c ≤ s ≤ c.
(5.9)
Hence, we obtain the following by functional calculus: for
−c id ≤ log ∆σ1 |ρ1 + D(ρ1 kσ1 ) id ≤ c id,
where
c ≡ k log ∆σ1 |ρ1 + D(ρ1 kσ1 ) idk, (5.10)
hΩρ1 , ∆tσ1 |ρ1 (Ωρ1 )i
1 tc
1 tc
≤e
e − e−tc (hΩρ1 , log ∆σ1 |ρ1 (Ωρ1 )i + D(ρ1 kσ1 )) +
e + e−tc
2c
2
1
2
2
= e−tD(ρ1 kσ1 ) etc + e−tc ≤ e−tD(ρ1 kσ1 )+t c /2 ,
2
−tD(ρ1 kσ1 )
where, in the last line, we used the fact that hΩρ1 , log ∆σ1 |ρ1 (Ωρ1 )i = −D(ρ1 kσ1 ), and the
inequality
1 u
2
(e + e−u ) ≤ eu /2
2
which can be verified by Taylor expansion. The above bound, together with (5.7) and (5.9),
yields,
hΩρn , P[λ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i ≤ Rn e−(λ+nD(ρ1 kσ1 ))t ent
where c is given in (5.10). Optimizing over t, we get
( n −(λ+nD(ρ kσ ))2 /(2nc2 )
1
1
R e
hΩρn , P[λ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i ≤
2
Rn e−(λ+nD(ρ1 kσ1 ))+nc /2
2 c2 /2
,
if λ ≤ n(c2 − D(ρ1 kσ1 )) (i)
else
(ii).
(5.11)
The reason for this separation of cases comes from the fact that the optimization procedure
can only be carried out for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1. The condition in (i) is found so that the global
optimizer t satisfies this condition. On the contrary, (ii) corresponds to the case in which the
global minimizer found is greater than 1: in this case we take the best minimizer within the
interval [0, 1], which is t = 1. Now given a sequence {Ln }n∈N of positive numbers, and any
n ∈ N, choose λ = − log Ln . We recall that by Proposition 1, there exists a sequence of tests
{Tn }n∈N such that β(Tn ) ≤ L−1
n and
α(Tn ) ≤ hΩρn , P(− log Ln ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i.
Setting ε to be the right hand side of (5.11)(i), we end up with
p
log βn (ε) ≤ − log Ln = −nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) + c 2n log(Rn ε−1 ),
2
which satisfies the condition − log Ln ≤ n(c2 − D(ρ1 kσ1 )) for ε ≥ Rn e−nc /2 . We here
implicitly used that R ≥ 1 so that the quantity inside of the square root is indeed positive.
If instead we set ε to be the right hand side of (5.11)(ii), we end up with
log βn (ε) ≤ − log Ln = −n(D(ρ1 kσ1 ) − log R) + nc2 /2 + log(ε−1 ),
2
this bound being achieved for − log Ln ≥ n(c2 − D(ρ1 kσ1 )), i.e. for ε ≤ Rn e−nc /2 . The
Hoeffding-type bounds of parameter r are derived similarly by setting the upper bounds in
(5.11) equal to e−nr .
26
The proof of Theorem 7 can be readily extended to the case of sequences {ρn }n∈N and
{σn }n∈N of states satisfying the non-homogeneous upper factorization property:
Corollary 1. Consider two sequences of states {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N satisfying the nonhomogeneous upper factorization property (4.1) with auxiliary families of states {ρ̃n }n∈N and
{σ̃n }n∈N , and R ≥ 1. Then, for any 0 ≤ ε ≤ 1 the following bounds hold for the Stein error:
√
(
2
n −1
e−Dn ({ρn }k{σn })+Cn 2 log(R ε )
if ε ≥ Rn e−Cn /2 ,
βn (ε) ≤
(5.12)
2
n −1
e−Dn ({ρn }k{σn })+Cn /2+log(R ε )
else,
where Cn2 :=
Pn
2
k=1 ck ,
with ck := k log ∆σ̃k kρ̃k + D(ρ̃k kσ̃k )idk, and
Dn ({ρn }k{σn }) :=
n
X
D(ρ̃k kσ̃k ).
k=1
Similarly, for any r > 0 the following bounds hold for the Hoeffding error:
√
(
if r ≤ Cn2 /(2n) − log R,
e−Dn ({ρn }k{σn })+Cn 2n(r+log R)
β̃n (r) ≤
2
e−Dn ({ρn }k{σn })+Cn /2+nr+n log R
else.
6
Moderate deviation hypothesis testing for correlated states
In this section, we derive bounds on the asymptotic behavior of the optimal type II error
in the moderate deviation regime, which interpolates between the regime of large deviations
(Stein’s lemma) and the one of the Central Limit Theorem (second order asymptotics).
A moderate sequence of real numbers {an }n∈N has as a defining property that an → 0 and
√
nan → ∞, as n → ∞. A typical example of such a sequence is given by the choice an = n−t
for some t ∈ (0, 1/2). Recently the moderate deviation analysis of quantum hypothesis testing for uncorrelated states was studied by Cheng et al. [10], and Chubb et al. [11]. Our results
extend theirs to families of correlated (i.e. non i.i.d.) states satisfying the upper and/or lower
factorization property. We first restate the result of [11] for sake of completeness. For two
states ρ, σ ∈ D(H), consider the ε-hypothesis testing relative entropy 4 , introduced by Wang
and Renner in [49]:
ε
DH
(ρkσ) := − log β(ε),
(6.1)
where β(ε) is the one-shot optimal type II error in the hypothesis testing problem with null
hypothesis ρ and alternative hypothesis σ:
β(ε) := min {β(T )| α(T ) ≤ ε}.
0≤T ≤I
4
This quantity is also referred to as ε-hypothesis testing divergence, e.g. in [11].
27
2
Theorem 8 ([11] Theorem 1). For ρ, σ > 0, a moderate sequence {an }n∈N and εn = e−nan ,
the εn -hypothesis testing divergences scales as
p
1 εn ⊗n ⊗n
DH (ρ kσ ) = D(ρkσ) − 2V (ρkσ)an + ◦(an ),
n
where D(ρkσ) is the quantum relative entropy defined in Equation (2.6), and V (ρkσ) is the
quantum information variance defined in Equation (2.8).
The proof of Theorem 8 relies on a reduction of the problem to the one of bounding the
law of a sum of independent random variables (which is a typical example of a martingale)
from above and below. Such a reduction does not directly carry over to the case of correlated
states, and hence a finer analysis of the error probabilities in the moderate deviation regime
is needed.
We recall that a sequence {ρn }n∈N of states ρn ∈ D(H⊗n ) satisfies the (homogeneous) upper
(lower)-factorization property if there exists R > 0 such that for each n > 1:
ρn ≤ R ρn−1 ⊗ ρ1
(upper factorization),
(6.2)
ρn ≥ R−1 ρn−1 ⊗ ρ1
(lower factorization).
(6.3)
Theorem 9. Let {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N be two sequences of states ρn , σn ∈ D(H⊗n ), and, for
2
each n, define εn := e−nan , where an is a given moderate sequence. If {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N
satisfy the upper factorization property (6.2), with
0 ≤ log R < (4 − ec )(ec − 1)2 V (ρ1 kσ1 )/(6c2 ),
where c := k log ∆σ1 kρ1 + D(ρ1 kσ1 )idk∞ < log 4. Then, for all n large enough:
p
1 εn
DH (ρn kσn ) ≥ D(ρ1 kσ1 ) − 2V (ρ1 kσ1 )
n
3
(log R + a2n )
4 − ec
1/2
(6.4)
If {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N satisfy the lower factorization property (6.3) with R > 1, then
p
1 εn
DH (ρn kσn ) ≤ D(ρ1 kσ1 ) − 2V (ρ1 kσ1 )an + ◦(an ).
n
(6.5)
Remark 3. As mentioned previously, Gibbs states satisfy both the upper and lower factorization property with R > 1. Hence for these states, both the upper and lower bounds of
Theorem 9 hold (see Section 4). Finitely correlated state are known to satisfy the upper
factorization property for R > 1.
Proof. The proof of Equation (6.4) closely follows the one of Theorem 7. We start by
recalling (5.9): let n ∈ N, then for any 0 ≤ t ≤ 1,
hΩρn , ∆tσn |ρn (Ωρn )i ≤ Rn e−ntD(ρ1 kσ1 ) hΩρ1 , et(log ∆σ1 |ρ1 +D(ρ1 kσ1 )) (Ωρ1 )in .
(6.6)
Define X to be the classical centered random variable associated with log ∆σ1 |ρ1 + D(ρ1 kσ1 )
and Ωρ1 as given through Equation (2.4). Then (6.6) can be rewritten as
hΩρn , ∆tσn |ρn (Ωρn )i ≤ Rn e−ntD(ρ1 kσ1 ) eΨn (t) ,
28
(6.7)
where Ψn (t) := n log E[etX ] is the cumulant generating function of the sum of n i.i.d. random
variables Xi of law identical to the one of X. Now, by Proposition 1, for any sequence
{Ln }n∈N of positive numbers such that, for each n, log Ln ≤ nD(ρ1 kσ1 ), there exists a
sequence {Tn }n∈N of tests such that for each n, β(Tn ) ≤ L−1
n and
α(Tn ) ≤ hΩρn , P(− log Ln ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i
(∆tσn |ρn )(Ωρn )i
= hΩρn , P(L−t
n ,∞)
≤ Ltn hΩρn , ∆tσn |ρn (Ωρn )i
≤ Rn e−[t(nD(ρ1 kσ1 )−log Ln )−Ψn (t)] .
(6.8)
where the inequality in the third line comes from the Markov-type inequality
P(− log Ln ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn ) ≤ Ltn ∆tσn |ρn ,
and the last inequality in (6.8) comes from (6.7). Following a similar Cramér-Chernoff method
as the one used in the proof of Bennett’s inequality (see e.g. Theorem 2.9 of [8]), one can
optimize the bound in (6.8) over t to obtain the following upper bound on α(Tn ):
nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) − log Ln
n
/c2 ,
(6.9)
α(Tn ) ≤ R exp −nV (ρ1 kσ1 )h c
nV (ρ1 kσ1 )
with h(u) := (1 + u) log(1 + u) − u, for u > 0, and where c := k log ∆σ1 kρ1 + D(ρ1 kσ1 )idk∞ .
Note that the argument of the function h in (6.9) is indeed positive since we chose log Ln ≤
nD(ρ1 kσ1 ). The optimizer, t0 , is given by
1
nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) − log Ln
t0 := log 1 + c
.
c
nV (ρ1 kσ1 )
Imposing t0 ≤ 1, we find that Ln has to satisfy
0 ≤ nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) − log Ln ≤ (ec − 1)nV (ρ1 kσ1 )/c.
(6.10)
Using now h(u) ≥ u2 /2 − u3 /6 for u ≥ 0 (see [45] Lemma 1), (6.9) yields
"
#
nV (ρ1 kσ1 ) 1
nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) − log Ln 2 1
nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) − log Ln 3
log α(Tn ) ≤ n log R −
c
−
c
c2
2
nV (ρ1 kσ1 )
6
nV (ρ1 kσ1 )
(nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) − log Ln )2
[(4 − ec )/3]
2nV (ρ1 kσ1 )
≡ log εn = −na2n ,
≤ n log R −
As in the proof of Theorem 7, the assumption that R ≥ 1 is crucial in order for the last
equation to have a solution. From the above we obtain the following expression for log Ln in
terms of an :
p
log Ln = nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) − n 2V (ρ1 kσ1 )
29
3
(log R + a2n )
4 − ec
1/2
,
provided that (6.10) is satisfied for large n. This condition imposes R to be smaller than
exp((4 − ec )(ec − 1)2 V (ρ1 kσ1 )/(6c2 )). From the above expression and the inequality β(Tn ) ≤
L−1
n we get:
p
1 εn
DH (ρn kσn ) ≥ D(ρ1 kσ1 ) − 2V (ρ1 kσ1 )
n
3
(log R + a2n )
4 − ec
1/2
Next we prove (6.5). We first recall the following result from [24] which we already used in
[12] in the context of second order asymptotic analysis,
Lemma 3. For any θn , vn ∈ R:
e−θn
hΩρn , P[−vn ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i ≤ e*sym (σn , e−θn ρn ),
1 + evn −θn
(6.11)
where e*sym (A, B) := inf 0≤T ≤I {Tr(A(I − T )) + Tr(BT )} is the minimum total probability of
error in symmetric hypothesis testing, the definition here being extended to unnormalized
operators A, B > 0.
Fix θn , vn ∈ R to be specified later, then (6.11) implies that, for any test 0 ≤ Tn ≤ In for
which α(Tn ) ≤ εn , we have
hΩρn , P[−vn ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i
−θn
β(Tn ) ≥ e
− εn
(6.12)
1 + evn −θn
Now for 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1,
hΩρn , P[−vn ,∞) (log ∆σn |ρn )(Ωρn )i = hΩρn , P[e−λvn ,∞) (∆λσn |ρn )(Ωρn )i
≥ 1 − e−λvn hΩρn , ∆−λ
σn |ρn (Ωρn )i,
(6.13)
where the last line above follows from the reverse Markov inequality (see Appendix A).
We now obtain a bound on hΩρn , ∆−λ
σn |ρn (Ωρn )i: consider the map
Wn : B(H⊗n )Ωρn → B(H⊗n )(Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ),
where
Wn−1 (Xn Ωρn ) = R−1/2 Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ).
Similarly to the map Vn−1 defined in Equation (5.2), one can show that the map Wn−1 is a
contraction, by the lower factorization property: for any Xn ∈ B(H⊗n ),
hWn−1 (Xn Ωρn ), Wn−1 (Xn Ωρn )i = R−1 hXn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )i
= R−1 Tr(Xn (ρn−1 ⊗ ρ1 )Xn∗ )
≤ Tr(Xn ρn Xn∗ )
= hXn Ωρn , Xn Ωρn )i.
30
Moreover,
hWn−1 (Xn Ωρn ), ∆σn−1 ⊗σ1 |ρn−1 ⊗ρ1 Wn−1 (Xn Ωρn )i
= R−1 hXn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 ), ∆σn−1 ⊗σ1 |ρn−1 ⊗ρ1 Xn (Ωρn−1 ⊗ Ωρ1 )i
= R−1 Tr((σn−1 ⊗ σ1 )Xn Xn∗ ) ≤ Tr(σn Xn Xn∗ )
= hXn Ωρn , ∆σn |ρn (Xn Ωρn )i,
so that
∗
Wn−1
∆σn−1 ⊗σ1 |ρn−1 ⊗ρ1 Wn−1 ≤ ∆σn |ρn .
(6.14)
This implies that for 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1,
∗
−λ
hΩρn , ∆−λ
(Ωρn )i
σn |ρn (Ωρn )i ≤ hΩρn , (Wn−1 (∆σn−1 ⊗σ1 |ρn−1 ⊗ρ1 )Wn−1 )
∗
≤ hΩρn , Wn−1
(∆σn−1 ⊗σ1 |ρn−1 ⊗ρ1 )−λ Wn−1 Ωρn i
−λ
= R−1 hΩρn−1 , ∆−λ
σn−1 |ρn−1 (Ωρn−1 )ihΩρ1 , ∆σ1 |ρ1 (Ωρ1 )i
n
≤ R−n hΩρ1 , ∆−λ
σ1 |ρ1 (Ωρ1 )i ,
(6.15)
where the first inequality follows from operator monotonicity of x 7→ −x−λ as well as (6.14),
the second one from operator convexity of x 7→ x−λ , and the last one by iterating the process
n − 1 times. Now by using inequalities (6.13) and (6.15), inequality (6.12) implies
!
n
1 − e−λvn R−n hΩρ1 , ∆−λ
σ1 |ρ1 (Ωρ1 )i
−θn
β(Tn ) ≥ e
− εn .
(6.16)
1 + evn −θn
Defining ξ ≡ log ∆σ1 |ρ1 + D(ρ1 kσ1 )id,
⊗n
n
−λξ
hΩρ1 , ∆−λ
(Ω
)i
=
hΩ
,
e
(Ωρ⊗n )ienλD(ρ1 kσ1 )
⊗n
ρ
1
ρ
σ1 |ρ1
1
1
which, by functional calculus, can be interpreted as the moment generating function of a
sum of centered i.i.d. random variables. Following the steps of the proof of the Berry-Esseen
theorem [14], one can find how quickly its associated cumulant generating function gets close
to the one of a Gaussian random variable. More precisely,
hΩρ1 , e−λξ (Ωρ1 )i = hΩρ1 , (id − λξ +
=1+
=e
(λξ)2
+ O λ3 ξ 3 )(Ωρ1 )i
2
λ2
V (ρ1 kσ1 ) + O(λ3 hΩρ1 , ξ 3 (Ωρ1 )i)
2
λ2
V
2
(ρ1 kσ1 )+O(λ3 hΩρ1 ,ξ 3 (Ωρ1 )i)
,
√
where we used the fact that hΩρ1 , ξ(Ωρ1 )i = 0 in the second line. Taking λ = 1/ n, (6.16)
reduces to
!
√
√ √
−vn / n e nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) R−n e 12 V (ρ1 kσ1 )+O(hΩρ1 ,ξ 3 (Ωρ1 )i/ n)
1
−
e
− εn .
β(Tn ) ≥ e−θn
1 + evn −θn
31
Choosing then, for any η > 0,
θn := nD(ρ1 kσ1 ) − n
p
2V (ρ1 kσ1 )an + ηnan /2,
and vn := θn − ηnan /2, the term between parentheses is bounded, so that, for n large enough,
p
1 εn
1
DH (ρ1 kσ1 ) ≤ θn + ηan /2 = D(ρ1 kσ1 ) − 2V (ρ1 kσ1 )an + ηan .
n
n
Remark 4. (6.4) is found similarly to the bounds derived in Theorem 7, and the proof is
inspired by the proof of Bernstein’s concentration inequality (see [25, 42]). As in the case
of the Azuma-Hoeffding-type bound (5.12), the difference with the derivation of Bernstein’s
inequality for tracial noncommutative probability spaces (see [25, 26, 44]) comes from the
fact that in the non-tracial case, the Golden-Thompson inequality (see e.g. [7]) does not hold
any longer, and its application is replaced by the use of operator Jensen’s inequality.
The above proof can be simply extended to take into account the non-homogeneous case.
We state the result in this case in the following corollary:
Corollary 2. Let {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N two sequences of states on ρn , σn ∈ D(H⊗n ). If
{ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N satisfy the non-homogeneous upper factorization property (4.1), with
0 ≤ log R < (4 − ec )(ec − 1)2 lim inf Vn ({ρ̃n }k{σ̃n })/(6nc2 ),
n
and associated auxiliary sequences {ρ̃n }n∈N and {σ̃n }n∈N such that
c := sup k log ∆σ̃n |ρ̃n − D(ρ̃n kσ̃n )k∞ < log 4,
n∈N
then for all n large enough:
1 εn
1
DH (ρn kσn ) ≥ Dn ({ρ̃n }k{σ̃n }) −
n
n
r
2Vn ({ρ̃n }k{σ̃n })
n
1/2
3
2
(log R + an )
,
4 − ec
where
Dn ({ρ̃n }k{σ̃n }) :=
n
X
D(ρ̃k kσ̃k ),
Vn ({ρ̃n }k{σ̃n }) :=
k=1
n
X
V (ρ̃k kσ̃k ).
k=1
If {ρn }n∈N and {σn }n∈N satisfy the non-homogeneous lower factorization property (4.2) with
R > 1, then,
r
2Vn ({ρ̃n }k{σ̃n })
1 εn
1
D (ρn kσn ) ≤ Dn ({ρ̃n }k{σ̃n }) −
an + ◦(an ).
(6.17)
n H
n
n
Remark 5. Theorem 1 of [11] (stated as Theorem 8 above) can be proved using the framework
of relative modular operators by following similar steps as in the proof of Theorem 9. The
proof would only differ from the one above in that in the case of sequences of uncorrelated
states, quantities of the form (log ∆σn |ρn + D(ρn kσn ) id) together with Ωρn can be directly
associated to sums of independent, centered random variables. Therefore Proposition 1 and
Lemma 3 suffice to reduce our problem to the one of finding asymptotic upper and lower
bounds on tail probabilities of classical martingales. The lower bound on the εn -hypothesis
testing relative entropy therefore arises from a direct application of Bennett’s inequality,
whereas the lower bound arises from a direct application of the Berry-Esseen theorem.
32
7
Application to classical-quantum channels with memory
In [11], the moderate deviation analysis of binary quantum hypothesis testing of pairs of
sequences of uncorrelated states served as a tool to find asymptotic rates for transmission
of information over a memoryless classical-quantum (c-q) channel5 , subject to a sequence of
2
tolerated error probabilities {εn }n∈N vanishing sub-exponentially, with εn := e−nan , for any
moderate sequence {an }n∈N of real numbers. Here, we extend their results to a class of c-q
channels with memory, described below. Let H be a finite-dimensional Hilbert space and X
be a (possibly uncountable) set of letters, called an alphabet. In what follows we assume that
X is finite. By a classical-quantum channel, we mean a map
W : X → D(H),
and we denote its image by Im(W).
Suppose that Alice (the sender) wants to communicate with Bob (the receiver) using the
channel W. To do this, they agree on a finite number of possible messages, labelled by the
index set M := {1, ..., M }. To send the message labelled by k ∈ M, Alice encodes her
message into a codeword φ(k) ≡ xk ∈ X . The c-q channel W maps the codeword xk to a
quantum state W(xk ) ∈ D(H), which Bob receives. To decode Alice’s message, Bob performs
a measurement, given by a POVM T = {T1 , ..., TM } on H, where, for i = 1, 2, ..., M , if the
outcome corresponding to Ti is obtained, he infers that the ith message was sent. If the
message k is sent, the probability of obtaining the outcome l is given by
P(l|k) = Tr(W(xk )Tl ),
and the average success probability of the encoding-decoding process is hence given by
P(success |W, T ) =
M
1 X
Tr(W(xk )Tk ).
M
k=1
For any fixed ε ∈ (0, 1), the one-shot ε-error capacity of W is defined as follows:
C(W, ε) := log M ∗ (W, ε),
where,
M ∗ (W, ε) := max {M ∈ N| ∃ POVM T ≡ {T1 , ..., TM } : P(sucess|W, T ) ≥ 1 − ε}.
(7.1)
Capacities of c-q channels were originally evaluated in the asymptotic limit in which the
channel is assumed to be available for arbitrary many uses. In the case of n successive uses of
a memoryless channel, the set of messages {1, ..., Mn } is encoded into n letters, each belonging
to a common alphabet X . The encoding map is written as follows:
φn : k ∈ {1, ..., Mn } 7→ φn (k) = (xk,1 , ..., xk,n ) ∈ X n .
5
A channel is said to be memoryless if there is no correlation in the noise acting on successive inputs to
the channel.
33
Then each letter x ∈ X is mapped to a state W(x). Then n successive uses of the channel
W map the sequence (xk,1 , ..., xk,n ) to
W ⊗n (xk,1 , ..., xk,n ) ≡ W(xk,1 ) ⊗ ... ⊗ W(xk,n ).
A natural extension of this framework is obtained by dropping the assumption of independence of successive uses of a single channel W, thus allowing the channel to have memory.
In this section we consider a particular class of channels with memory defined as follows:
let Wn : X n → D(H⊗n ) be a c-q channel where, for each (x1 , ..., xn ) ∈ X n , Wn (x1 , ..., xn )
satisfies the non-homogeneous upper-factorization property
Wn (x1 , ..., xn ) ≤ R Wn−1 (x1 , ..., xn−1 ) ⊗ W1 (xn ).
(7.2)
for some positive number R. We call this property of the maps Wn channel upper factorization
property. Similarly, the assumption of independence of uses of a channel can be relaxed
to incorporate another class of c-q channels with memory, whose outputs satisfy the nonhomogeneous lower-factorization property:
R−1 Wn−1 (x1 , ..., xn−1 ) ⊗ W1 (xn ) ≤ Wn (x1 , ..., xn ),
(7.3)
and we call this property of the maps Wn channel lower factorization property.
We obtain bounds on the capacity of the above mentioned channels (i) for the case of finite blocklength (i.e. finite n), as well as (ii) in the moderate deviation regime. Our result
(ii) extends the analysis of [11], where asymptotic rates were found in the case of memoryless
c-q channels, to these new classes of channels with memory. As in [11], the proofs of our
results rely on bounds on the one-shot capacity of c-q channels obtained by Wang and Renner
[49] (stated as Theorem 10 below) as well as the ones derived in Proposition 5 of [48]. Here
we make use of the notations of [32]: For every c-q channel W : X → D(H), the following
map
W : X → D(HX ⊗ H),
W(x) := |xihx| ⊗ W(x)
is called the lifted channel of W, where HX is an auxiliary Hilbert space, and {|xi : x ∈ X }
is an orthonormal basis in it. The map W admits a natural linear extension to the set of
probability mass functions pX on X given by:
X
W(pX ) :=
pX (x)W(x).
x∈X
This extension can also be used at the level of the lifted channels as follows:
X
W(pX ) :=
pX (x)|xihx| ⊗ W(x).
x∈X
Theorem 10 ([49] Theorem 1). The ε-error one-shot capacity of a c-q channel W : X →
D(H) satisfies:
0
ε
C(W, ε) ≥ sup DH
(ρX kσX ) − log
pX
34
4ε
,
(ε − ε0 )
for every ε0 ∈ (0, ε), where for any finitely supported probability mass function pX on X ,
X
ρX := W(pX ),
σX :=
pX (x)|xihx| ⊗ W(pX ).
x∈X
In our proofs, we also use the following results that one can for example find in [48].
Given a c-q channel W, the Holevo capacity of W is given by
χ∗ (W) := min
sup D(W(x)kσ).
σ∈D(H) x∈X
The minimization over σ ∈ D(H) is achieved for a unique state called the divergence centre
and denoted by σ ∗ (W). The Holevo capacity has the following alternative representation
X
χ∗ (W) ≡ sup
pX (x)D (W(x)kW(pX )) ,
pX
x∈X
and we denote the set of probability mass functions for which the above supremum is achieved
by Π(W). Now there exists a probability mass function pX ∈ Π(W) such that [48]
D(ρpX kσpX ) = χ∗ (W),
V (ρpX kσpX ) = Vmin (W),
(7.4)
for states
ρpX = W(pX ),
X
σpX =
pX (x)|xihx| ⊗ W(pX ),
(7.5)
x∈X
where
Vmin (W) :=
inf
qX ∈Π(W)
X
qX (x)V (W(x)kσ ∗ (W)),
x∈X
where V (·k·) is defined in Equation (2.8). We are interested in the finite blocklength behavior
of the one-shot ε-error capacity of the sequence of channels Wn that is the dependence of
C(Wn , ε) on n. More precisely, we obtain lower bounds on C(Wn , ε) in the following cases:
(i) Wn := W ⊗n (memoryless case), and
(ii) Wn satisfies the channel upper factorization property (7.2).
The following result is a consequence of Theorem 5, Corollary 1 and Theorem 10 (for (i)
one could alternatively use Theorem 6 to get stronger bounds, but we omit this analysis for
simplicity):
Proposition 5. (i) Let W : X → D(H) be a memoryless c-q channel. Then, for any
ε ∈ (0, 1), any pX ∈ Π(W), and any ε0 ∈ (0, ε):
C(W ⊗n , ε) ≥ nχ∗ (W) −
p
2n log ε0−1 cpX − log
4ε
,
ε − ε0
where cpX := k log ∆σpX |ρpX + D(ρpX kσpX )idk∞ , and ρpX and σpX are defined as in Equation (7.5).
35
(ii) Let {Wn }n∈N be a family of c-q channels Wn : X ⊗n → D(H⊗n ) satisfying the channel upper factorization property (7.2) with parameter R ≥ 1. Then for any ε ∈ (0, 1), any
pX ∈ Π(W1 ) and any ε0 ∈ (0, ε):
p
2
4ε
nχ∗ (W1 ) − cpX 2n log(Rn ε0−1 ) − log
for Rn e−ncpX /2 ≤ ε0 < ε,
0
ε−ε
C(Wn , ε) ≥
2
nc
4ε
nχ∗ (W1 ) − pX − log Rn ε0−1 − log
else.
2
ε − ε0
Proof. We first prove (i): by a direct application of Theorem 10, for any ε0 ∈ (0, ε),
4ε
ε
−
ε0
pX n
4ε
ε0
≥ sup DH
(ρq⊗n kσq⊗n ) − log
X
X
ε − ε0
qX
4ε
ε0
,
≥ DH
(ρp⊗n kσp⊗n ) − log
X
X
ε − ε0
0
ε
C(W ⊗n , ε) ≥ sup DH
(ρpX n kσpX n ) − log
(7.6)
ε was defined in Equation (6.1).
for any probability mass function pX ∈ Π(W), where DH
Therefore, the problem reduces to the one of finding an upper bound to the optimal error of
. From (3.14), we
≡ σp⊗n
type II for the two i.i.d. sequences of states ρp⊗n ≡ ρ⊗n
pX and σp⊗n
X
X
X
directly get
p
ε0
DH
(ρp⊗n kσp⊗n ) ≥ nD(ρpX kσpX ) − 2n log ε0−1 cpX ,
X
X
and (i) follows from the fact that pX ∈ Π(W), so that D(ρpX kσpX ) ≡ χ∗ (W).
Case (ii) can be proved in a very similar way by noticing that in the case when Wn satisfies the channel upper factorization property (7.2), the following states satisfy the upper
factorization property:
X
pX (x1 ) ... pX (xn )|x1 ... xn ihx1 ... xn | Wn (x1 , ..., xn )
ρp⊗n := Wn (p⊗n
X )=
X
(x1 ,...,xn )∈X n
≤ R ρp⊗n−1 ⊗ ρpX ,
X
and
σp⊗n :=
X
X
pX (x1 ) ... pX (xn )|x1 ... xn ihx1 ... xn | ⊗ Wn (p⊗n
X ) ≤ R σp⊗n−1 ⊗ σpX ,
X
(x1 ,...,xn )∈X n
where we took pX to be the distribution such that ρpX and σpX satisfy Equation (7.4) for
W ≡ W1 . We then obtain the statement of the theorem using (7.6), Theorem 7, and (7.4).
The moderate deviation analysis of the sequences of channels with memory defined above
is given by the following proposition.
Proposition 6. (i) Let {Wn }n∈N be a family of c-q channels Wn : X ⊗n → D(H⊗n ) satisfying
the channel upper factorization property (7.2) with parameter R such that
1 ≤ R < exp[(4 − ecpX )(1 − ecpX )2 Vmin (W1 )/(6c2pX )],
36
where cpX := k log ∆σpX |ρpX + D(ρpX kσpX )idk∞ < log 4, for some probability mass function
pX satisfying Equation (7.4), and ρpX and σpX are defined as in Equation (7.5). Moreover,
2
let {an }n∈N be a moderate sequence and εn = e−nan . Then,
∗
p
C(Wn , εn ) ≥ nχ (W1 ) − n 2Vmin (W1 )
1/2
3
2
(log R + an )
+ ◦(nan ).
4 − ecpX
(7.7)
(ii) Let {Wn }n∈N be a family of c-q channels Wn : X ⊗n → D(H⊗n ) satisfying the channel
lower factorization property (7.3) with parameter R > 1. Then:
p
(7.8)
C(Wn , εn ) ≤ nχ∗ (W1 ) − 2Vmin (W1 )nan + ◦(nan )
The proof of Proposition 6 closely follows that of Propositions 12 and 18 of [11]. The extra
ingredient here is the fact that, if Wn satisfies a channel factorization property, the states in
Im(Wn ) satisfy a non-homogeneous factorization property, so that one can use Corollary 2,
together with the one-shot bounds on the classical-quantum capacity to get the result. We
included a proof in Appendix C for sake of completeness.
8
Summary and discussion
In this paper we proved upper bounds on type II Stein- and Hoeffding errors, in the context
of finite blocklength binary quantum hypothesis testing, using the framework of martingale
concentration inequalities. These inequalities constitute a powerful mathematical tool which
has found important applications in various branches of mathematics. We prove that our
bounds are tighter than those obtained by Audenaert, Mosonyi and Verstraete in [5], for
a wide range of threshold values of the type I error, which is of practical relevance. We
then derived finite blocklength bounds, as well as moderate deviation results, for pairs of
sequences of correlated states satisfying a certain factorization property. We applied our results to find bounds on the capacity of an associated class of classical-quantum channels with
memory, in the finite blocklength, and moderate deviation regimes, This extends the recent
results of Chubb, Tan and Tomamichel [11], and Cheng and Hsieh [10] to the non-i.i.d. setting.
We believe that such extensions can be of practical relevance, for the following reasons:
In the usual framework of quantum hypothesis testing, the systems that are being tested are
demolished by the measurement process. However, in a practical experiment, the experimentalist might want to get some information about the physical system being analyzed without
disturbing its state so that it can be used for some other information theoretic task. Although finitely correlated states were originally introduced in [16] in the context of quantum
states on spin chains, they also seem to provide the right setup for what we call quantum
non-demolition hypothesis testing (QNDHT): In this framework, the goal is to determine
the state of a quantum system, given the knowledge that it is one of two specific states
ρ, σ ∈ B(K), for a given finite-dimensional Hilbert space K, without demolishing the system.
A seemingly natural way to proceed is to prepare two sequences of finitely correlated states
ρ̄n , σ̄n ∈ D(H⊗n ), where H is the Hilbert space of another system that can be interpreted as
37
a probe, as follows:
ρ̄n := TrK (idn−1
A ⊗ E∗ ) ◦ · · · ◦ (idA ⊗ E∗ ) ◦ E∗ (ρ),
(8.1)
σ̄n := TrK (idn−1
A ⊗ E∗ ) ◦ · · · ◦ (idA ⊗ E∗ ) ◦ E∗ (σ),
(8.2)
where E∗ is the adjoint of a CPU map E : B(H)⊗B(K) → B(K), to be specified later, encoding
the interaction of the original system with the probes, such that
TrH (E∗ (ρ)) = ρ and
TrH (E∗ (σ)) = σ.
This last condition precisely means that the original system (with Hilbert space K) should
remain intact no matter what local operation (measurement) is done on the probes (whose
Hilbert space is H⊗n ). Note, however, that from Theorem 9, we infer that the optimal Stein
exponent in the quantum hypothesis problem with null hypotheses {ρ̄n }n∈N and alternative
hypotheses {σ̄n }n∈N is given by
D(ρ̄1 kσ̄1 ) ≤ D(ρkσ),
where the last inequality follows from the data processing inequality. Intuitively, this means
that the optimal error of type II made by measuring the probes is asymptotically larger
than the error that one would make by performing a direct measurement on n copies of the
original system. A similar explanation holds for any fixed n, as the ε-hypothesis testing
ε also satisfies a data processing inequality. An example of a map E
relative entropy DH
∗
implementing the conditions described above can be described as follows: suppose without
loss of generality that the system with Hilbert space K is in the state ρ. Then, at each step,
make it interact with a probe H, which is initially in the state ω ∈ D(H):
ρ 7→ U (ρ ⊗ ω)U ∗ ,
where U is a unitary operator on K ⊗ H. In order to optimize the Stein exponent, we then
consider the following optimization problem:
maximize
D(ρ̄1 kσ̄1 ),
subject to
ρ̄1 = TrK (U (ρ ⊗ ω)U ∗ ),
σ̄1 = TrK (U (σ ⊗ ω)U ∗ ),
the optimization being carried over all states ω on H and unitaries U over H ⊗ K satisfying
ρ = TrH (U (ρ ⊗ ω)U ∗ ),
σ = TrH (U (σ ⊗ ω)U ∗ ).
Secondly, c-q channels satisfying the channel factorization properties could potentially lead to
new ways of efficiently implementing quantum communication channels. Indeed, Kastoryano
and Brandao [27] recently showed that, under some technical assumptions, Gibbs states of
spin systems can be efficiently prepared by means of a dissipative process. Moreover, as discussed in Section 4, Gibbs states of translation-invariant finite-range interactions on quantum
spin chains were shown to satisfy both lower and upper homogeneous factorization properties
38
for R > 1 [19]. We conjecture that by lifting the assumption of translation-invariance, one
should obtain Gibbs states which satisfy both upper and lower non-homogeneous factorization properties. If this is indeed the case, the result of [27] would provide an efficient way of
implementing a c-q channel satisfying both lower and upper channel factorization properties
whose capacity would be comparable (at least to leading order) to the one of memoryless
c-q- channels (cf. Section 7). The advantage of such a physical implementation comes from
the robustness of such a dissipative preparation, in comparison with the difficulty of ensuring
states to remain uncorrelated over a long period of time.
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Eric Hanson, Milan Mosonyi and
Yan Pautrat for useful discussions. C.R. is also grateful to Federico Pasqualotto for helpful
exchanges.
References
[1] Y. Altug and A. B. Wagner. Moderate deviations in channel coding. IEEE Transactions
on Information Theory, 60(8):4417–4426, 2014.
[2] H. Araki. Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras. Publ. Res. Inst. Math.
Sci., 11(3):809–833, 1975/76.
[3] H. Araki. Relative entropy for states of von Neumann algebras. II. Publ. Res. Inst.
Math. Sci., 13(1):173–192, 1977/78.
[4] K. M. R. Audenaert, J. Calsamiglia, R. Muñoz Tapia, E. Bagan, L. Masanes, A. Acin,
and F. Verstraete. Discriminating states: The quantum Chernoff bound. Phys. Rev.
Lett., 98:160501, 2007.
[5] K. M. R. Audenaert, M. Mosonyi, and F. Verstraete. Quantum state discrimination
bounds for finite sample size. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 53(12), 2012.
[6] K. Azuma. Weighted sums of certain dependent random variables. Tohoku Math. J. (2),
19(3):357–367, 1967.
[7] R. Bhatia. Matrix analysis, volume 169 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. SpringerVerlag, New York, 1997.
[8] S. Boucheron, G. Lugosi, and P. Massart. Concentration inequalities: A nonasymptotic
theory of independence. Oxford university press, 2013.
[9] O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson. Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics.
1. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1987.
[10] H.-C. Cheng and M.-H. Hsieh. Moderate deviation analysis for classical-quantum channels and quantum hypothesis testing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.03195, 2017.
[11] C. T. Chubb, V. Y. Tan, and M. Tomamichel. Moderate deviation analysis for classical
communication over quantum channels. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.03114, 2017.
39
[12] N. Datta, Y. Pautrat, and C. Rouzé. Second-order asymptotics for quantum hypothesis testing in settings beyond i.i.d. - quantum lattice systems and more. Journal of
Mathematical Physics, 57(6), 2016.
[13] C. Davis. A schwarz inequality for convex operator functions. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 8(1):42–44, 1957.
[14] R. Durrett. Probability: theory and examples. Cambridge university press, 2010.
[15] D. Elkouss and S. Wehner. (Nearly) optimal P values for all Bell inequalities. Npj
Quantum Information, 2:16026, 2016.
[16] M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner. Finitely correlated states on quantum
spin chains. Comm. Math. Phys., 144(3):443–490, 1992.
[17] F. Hansen and G. K. Pedersen. Jensen’s inequality for operators and Löwner ’s theorem.
Mathematische Annalen, 258:229–242, 1981.
[18] M. Hayashi. Error exponent in asymmetric quantum hypothesis testing and its application to classical-quantum channel coding. Phys. Rev. A, 76:062301, 2007.
[19] F. Hiai, M. Mosonyi, and T. Ogawa. Large deviations and Chernoff bound for certain
correlated states on a spin chain. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 48(12):123301, 2007.
[20] F. Hiai, M. Mosonyi, and T. Ogawa. Error exponents in hypothesis testing for correlated
states on a spin chain. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 49(3):032112, 2008.
[21] F. Hiai and D. Petz. The proper formula for relative entropy and its asymptotics in
quantum probability. Comm. Math. Phys., 143(1):99–114, 1991.
[22] W. Hoeffding. Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. Journal
of the American Statistical Association, 58(301):13–30, 1963.
[23] R. Impagliazzo and V. Kabanets. Constructive proofs of concentration bounds. In
Approximation, randomization, and combinatorial optimization, volume 6302 of Lecture
Notes in Comput. Sci., pages 617–631. Springer, Berlin, 2010.
[24] V. Jakšić, Y. Ogata, C.-A. Pillet, and R. Seiringer. Quantum hypothesis testing and
non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. Rev. Math. Phys., 24(6):1230002, 67, 2012.
[25] M. Junge and Q. Zeng. Noncommutative Bennett and Rosenthal inequalities. Ann.
Probab., 41(6):4287–4316, 11 2013.
[26] M. Junge and Q. Zeng. Noncommutative martingale deviation and Poincaré type inequalities with applications. Probability Theory and Related Fields, pages 1–59, 2014.
[27] M. J. Kastoryano and F. G. S. L. Brandão. Quantum gibbs samplers: The commuting
case. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 344(3):915–957, 2016.
[28] M. Kearns and L. Saul. Large deviation methods for approximate probabilistic inference. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence,
pages 311–319. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1998.
40
[29] M. Ledoux. The concentration of measure phenomenon. Number 89. American Mathematical Soc., 2005.
[30] K. Li. Second-order asymptotics for quantum hypothesis testing.
42(1):171–189, 2014.
Ann. Statist.,
[31] C. McDiarmid. On the method of bounded differences. Surveys in combinatorics,
141(1):148–188, 1989.
[32] M. Mosonyi and T. Ogawa. Strong converse exponent for classical-quantum channel
coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.3562, 2014.
[33] M. Mosonyi and T. Ogawa. Two approaches to obtain the strong converse exponent of
quantum hypothesis testing for general sequences of quantum states. IEEE Transactions
on Information Theory, 61(12):6975–6994, 2015.
[34] H. Nagaoka. The converse part of the theorem for quantum Hoeffding bound. arXiv
preprint arXiv:0611289, 2006.
[35] M. Nussbaum and A. Szkola. The Chernoff lower bound for symmetric quantum hypothesis testing. Ann. Statist., 37(2):1040–1057, 2009.
[36] T. Ogawa and M. Hayashi. On error exponents in quantum hypothesis testing. IEEE
Trans. Inform. Theory, 50(6):1368–1372, 2004.
[37] T. Ogawa and H. Nagaoka. Strong converse and Stein’s lemma in quantum hypothesis
testing. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 46(7):2428–2433, 2000.
[38] M. Ohya and D. Petz. Quantum entropy and its use. Texts and Monographs in Physics.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
[39] D. Petz. Quasientropies for states of a von Neumann algebra. Publications of the Research
Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 21(4):787–800, 1985.
[40] D. Petz. Quasi-entropies for finite quantum systems. Reports on Mathematical Physics,
23(1):57–65, 1986.
[41] Y. Polyanskiy and S. Verdú. Channel dispersion and moderate deviations limits for
memoryless channels. In Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2010
48th Annual Allerton Conference on, pages 1334–1339. IEEE, 2010.
[42] M. Raginsky and I. Sason. Concentration of measure inequalities in information theory,
communications, and coding. Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory, 10(1-2):1–246, 2013.
[43] M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I. Academic Press,
Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York, second edition, 1980.
[44] G. Sadeghi and M. S. Moslehian. Noncommutative martingale concentration inequalities.
Illinois J. Math., 58(2):561–575, 2014.
41
[45] I. Sason. Moderate deviations analysis of binary hypothesis testing. In 2012 IEEE
International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings, pages 821–825, 2012.
[46] M. Talagrand. A new look at independence. Ann. Probab., 24(1):1–34, 01 1996.
[47] M. Tomamichel and M. Hayashi. A hierarchy of information quantities for finite block
length analysis of quantum tasks. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 59(11):7693–7710, 2013.
[48] M. Tomamichel and V. Y. F. Tan. Second-order asymptotics for the classical capacity of image-additive quantum channels. Communications in Mathematical Physics,
338(1):103–137, 2015.
[49] L. Wang and R. Renner. One-shot classical-quantum capacity and hypothesis testing.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:200501, 2012.
A
A reverse Markov inequality
Lemma 4 (Reverse Markov inequality). Let X be a strictly positive random variable, such
that 1/X is integrable. Then, for any x > 0,
X −x
P(X > x) ≥ E
.
X
Proof. For any decreasing bounded positive function u such that u−1 is also bounded,
P(X > x) = 1 − P(X ≤ x)
= 1 − P(u(X) ≥ u(x))
E[u(X)]
,
≥1−
u(x)
where we used Markov’s inequality in the last line. Taking u(x) = (1 + tx)−1 for any given
t > 0,
t(X − x)
X −x
X −x
−1
P(X > x) ≥ 1 − E[(1 + tX) ](1 + tx) = E
= tE
=E
.
1 + tX
1 + tX
1/t + X
The result follows by monotone convergence theorem, taking the limit t → ∞.
B
Proof of Proposition 3
The following lemma, originally proved in [19], plays the key role in the proof of the factorization property of non-homogeneous finitely correlated states.
Lemma 5 (see Lemma 4.3 of [19]). Let B ⊂ B(K) be a finite-dimensional C ∗ -subalgebra
of B(K) for some finite-dimensional Hilbert space K. Let ρ be a faithful state on B and
Φ : B → B be the completely positive unital map b 7→ Tr(ρb)IB . Then there exists a constant
R > 1 such that RΦ − idB is completely positive.
42
Proof.[Proposition 3] Using the notations of Section 4, let {ρn }n∈N be a family of nonhomogeneous finitely correlated states with generating triple (B, {En }n∈N , ρ). By Lemma 5,
⊗n
there exists R > 1 such that R id⊗n
A ⊗ (En∗ ◦ Φ∗ ) − idA ⊗ En∗ is positive for any n ∈ N, where
Φ∗ : a 7→ ρ Tr(a). Hence
ρn := TrB τn ≤ R TrB [id⊗n−1
⊗ (En∗ ◦ Φ∗ )(τn−1 )]
A
= R TrB [(id⊗n−1
⊗ En∗ )(TrB (τn−1 ) ⊗ ρ)]
A
= R ρn−1 ⊗ TrB (En∗ (ρ))
= R ρn−1 ⊗ ρ̃n ,
where ρ̃n is defined as TrB En∗ (ρ).
C
Proof of Proposition 6
For classical-quantum channels satisfying a channel factorization property, the expressions
found in Corollary 2 can be used to get asymptotic behaviors for the capacity in the moderate
deviation regime. The proof of (7.8) is more technical and follows the idea of [11] (see also
[48]). In order to prove it, we introduce the following geometric quantities: following [48], for
some subset of states S ⊆ D(H), the divergence radius χ(S) and divergence centre σ ∗ (S) are
defined as
χ(S) :=
inf
σ ∗ (S) := arg min sup D(ρkσ).
sup D(ρkσ),
σ∈D(H) ρ∈S
σ∈D(H) ρ∈S
Similarly, the ε-hypothesis testing divergence radius χεH (S) is defined as
χεH (S) :=
inf
ε
sup DH
(ρkσ),
σ∈D(H) ρ∈S
The ε-hypothesis testing divergence radius provides an upper bound to the one-shot capacity:
Theorem 11 (see Proposition 5 of [48]). The ε-error one shot capacity, for 0 < ε < 1/2, is
upper bounded as follows:
C(W, ε) ≤ χ2ε
H (Im(W)) + log
2
.
(1 − 2ε)(1 − ε)
(C.1)
We will also need the following lemma from [48]:
Lemma 6 (Lemma 18 of [48]). For every δ ∈ (0, 1), there exists a finite set S δ ⊂ D(H) of
cardinality
2
90d 2d
δ
,
|S | ≤
δ2
where d ≡ dim(H), such that for every ρ ∈ D(H), there exists a state τ ∈ S δ such that
D(ρkτ ) ≤ δ,
λmin (τ ) ≥
δ
,
25d2
where λmin (τ ) stands for the minimum eigenvalue of the state τ .
43
Proof.[Proposition 6]
The proof of (i) follows very closely the one of Proposition 5 (ii), the only difference being
the application of (6.4) instead of (5.12) to bound the optimal error of type II.
We now prove (ii): by (C.1),
n
C(Wn , εn ) ≤ χ2ε
H (Im(Wn )) + log
2
(1 − 2εn )(1 − εn )
(C.2)
Im(Wn ) consists of states satisfying a non-homogeneous lower factorization property with
parameter R > 1. Let ρn ∈ Im(Wn ), with associated auxiliary sequence {ρ̃k }nk=1 . Define
n
1X
ρ̃k .
ρ̄n :=
n
k=1
For γ a constant to be chosen later, define
(
)
n
1X
H(γ) := n :
D(ρ̃i kρ̄n ) ≥ χ∗ (W1 ) − γ ,
n
i=1
(
)
n
1X
∗
L(γ) := n :
D(ρ̃i kρ̄n ) < χ (W1 ) − γ ,
n
i=1
such that H(γ) and L(γ) bipartition N for all γ. Let us define
X
1
1
σn (γ) := [σ ∗ (Im(W1 ))]⊗n +
τ ⊗n ,
2
2|S γ/4 |
γ/4
(C.3)
τ ∈S
where S γ/4 is defined through Lemma 6, with δ ≡ γ/4. The idea of the proof is then to
bound the divergences with respect to σn (γ) by those with respect to either σ ∗ (Im(W1 )) or
any element of S γ/4 , using the following inequality:
ε
ε
DH
(ρkµσ + (1 − µ)σ 0 ) ≤ DH
(ρkσ) − log µ.
(C.4)
Let us first assume that n ∈ L(γ), and define τn to be the closest element in S γ/4 to ρn , so
that D(ρ̄n kτn ) ≤ γ/4. Using Equation (C.3) we extract the term involving τn⊗n to obtain
εn
εn
DH
(ρn kσn (γ)) ≤ DH
(ρn kτn⊗n ) − log
1
.
2|S γ/4 |
Hence, for n large enough,
1 εn
1 εn
DH (ρn kσn (γ)) ≤ DH
(ρn kτn⊗n ) + γ/4.
n
n
Now applying (6.17) we get that, for n large enough,
r Pn
n
X
2 i=1 V (ρ̃i kτn )
1 εn
1
DH (ρn kτn⊗n ) ≤
D(ρ̃i kτn ) −
an + γ/4.
n
n
n
i=1
44
(C.5)
(C.6)
Now the following holds:
n
X
D(ρ̃i kτn ) =
i=1
=
n
X
i=1
n
X
Tr ρ̃i (log ρ̃i − log ρ̄n ) +
n
X
Tr ρ˜i (log ρ̄n − log τn )
i=1
D(ρ̃i kρ̄n ) + nD(ρ̄n kτn )
i=1
≤
n
X
D(ρ̃i kρ̄n ) + nγ/4,
(C.7)
i=1
where the last inequality above comes from the fact that we picked τn specifically so that
D(ρ̄n kτn ) ≤ γ/4. Hence, combining (C.5), (C.6) and (C.7), we have shown that for n large
enough:
r Pn
n
2 i=1 V (ρ̃i kτn )
1X
1 εn
DH (ρn kσn (γ)) ≤
an + 3γ/4.
D(ρ̃i kρ̄n ) −
n
n
n
i=1
Finally, since n ∈ L(γ),
r Pn
2 i=1 V (ρ̃i kτn )
1 εn
DH (ρn kσn (γ)) ≤ χ∗ (W1 ) −
an − γ/4.
(C.8)
n
n
We now take care of the case when n ∈ H(γ). Let η > 0. We use Equation (C.3) to extract
the term involving σ ∗ (Im(W1 )):
εn
εn
(ρn k[σ ∗ (Im(W1 ))]⊗n ) + log 2.
(ρn kσn (γ)) ≤ DH
DH
This implies that for any η > 0 there exists N > 0 such that for any n > N ,
1 εn
1 εn
(ρn k[σ ∗ (Im(W1 ))]⊗n ) + ηan /3.
DH (ρn kσn (γ)) ≤ DH
n
n
Assume first that Vmin (W1 ) ≤ η 2 /18. Applying (6.17) for large enough n,
(C.9)
1 εn
1 εn
(ρn k[σ ∗ (Im(W1 ))]⊗n ) + ηan /3
DH (ρn kσn (γ)) ≤ DH
n
n
n
1X
D(ρ̃i kσ ∗ (Im(W1 ))) + 2ηan /3
≤
n
≤
1
n
i=1
n
X
D(ρ̃i kσ ∗ (Im(W1 ))) −
p
2Vmin (W1 )an + ηan
i=1
≤ χ∗ (W1 ) −
p
2Vmin (W1 )an + ηan ,
where the last inequality follows from the definition of σ ∗ (Im(W1 )), and the fact that ρ̃i ∈
Im(W1 ).
For Vmin (W1 ) > η 2 /18, consider the following quantity:
Ṽmin (γ)
(
:= inf
pX
X
x∈X
pX (x)V W1 (x)kσ ∗ (Im(W1 ))
)
X
x∈X
45
pX (x)D (W1 (x)kW1 (pX )) ≥ χ∗ (W1 ) − γ
,
where the infimum is taken over any probability mass function pX on X . By definition
Ṽmin (0) = Vmin (W1 ), and using Lemma 22 of [48], we know that limγ→0+ Ṽmin (γ) = Vmin (W1 ).
Hence, for any η > 0 there exists a positive constant γ0 such that
q
p
2Ṽmin (γ0 ) ≥ 2Vmin (W1 ) − η/3.
(C.10)
As Vmin (W1 ) > η 2 /18, this implies that Ṽmin (γ0 ) > 0.
P
Next, define the empirical probability mass function pn (x) := n1 ni=1 δ(W1 (x) − ρ̃i ). For
all n ∈ H(γ0 ),
n
X
X
1X
pn (x)D W1 (x)
pn (y)W1 (y) =
D(ρ̃i kρ̄n ) ≥ χ∗ (W1 ) − γ0 ,
n
x∈X
i=1
y∈X
and so we can lower bound the average quantum information variance with respect to the
divergence centre
n
X
1X
V (ρ̃i kσ ∗ (Im(W1 ))) =
pn (x)V (W1 (x)kσ ∗ (Im(W1 ))) ≥ Ṽmin (γ0 ) > 0.
n
i=1
x∈X
Using this lower bound, we can once again apply (6.17) to (C.9) so that for n ∈ H(γ0 ) large
enough,
1 εn
1 εn
(ρn k[σ ∗ (Im(W1 ))]⊗n ) + ηan /3
DH (ρn kσn (γ0 )) ≤ DH
n
n
s
P
n
2 ni=1 V (ρ̃i kσ ∗ (Im(W1 )))
1X
∗
≤
D(ρ̃i kσ (Im(W1 ))) −
an + 2ηan /3
n
n
i=1
q
n
X
1
≤
D(ρ̃i kσ ∗ (Im(W1 ))) − 2Ṽmin (γ0 )an + 2ηan /3
n
i=1
p
∗
≤ χ (W1 ) − 2Vmin (W1 )an + ηan ,
where we used (C.10) in the last line. We showed that for any η > 0 there exists γ0 such that
for n large enough
( ∗
χ (W1 ) − γ0 /4
n ∈ L(γ0 ),
1 εn
p
DH (ρn kσn (γ0 )) ≤
∗
n
χ (W1 ) − 2Vmin (W1 )an + ηan n ∈ H(Γ).
This implies that for any n large enough:
p
1 εn
DH (ρn kσn (γ0 )) ≤ χ∗ (W1 ) − 2Vmin (W1 )an + ηan
n
Using the definition of χH and substituting the above inequality on the right hand side of
(C.2), for n large enough, we get
C(Wn , εn ) ≤
inf
σn
∈D(H⊗n )
sup
2εn
DH
(ρn kσn ) + log
ρn ∈Im(Wn )
≤ nχ∗ (W1 ) −
2
(1 − εn )(1 − 2εn )
p
2Vmin (W1 )nan + ηnan + log
46
2
(1 − εn )(1 − 2εn )
Taking the limit η → 0, we end up with,
C(Wn , εn ) ≤ nχ∗ (W1 ) −
p
2Vmin (W1 )nan + ◦(nan )
47
| 10math.ST
|
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED
SIGNALS
arXiv:1604.00424v4 [cs.IT] 21 Feb 2018
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
Abstract. The problem of recovering signals of high complexity from low quality sensing devices
is analyzed via a combination of tools from signal processing and harmonic analysis. By using the
rich structure offered by the recent development in fusion frames, we introduce a compressed sensing
framework in which we split the dense information into sub-channel or local pieces and then fuse the
local estimations. Each piece of information is measured by potentially low quality sensors, modeled
by linear matrices and recovered via compressed sensing – when necessary. Finally, by a fusion process
within the fusion frames, we are able to recover accurately the original signal.
Using our new method, we show, and illustrate on simple numerical examples, that it is possible,
and sometimes necessary, to split a signal via local projections and / or filtering for accurate, stable,
and robust estimation. In particular, we show that by increasing the size of the fusion frame, a certain
robustness to noise can also be achieved. While the computational complexity remains relatively low,
we achieve stronger recovery performance compared to usual single-device compressed sensing systems.
1. Problem statement
In a traditional sampling and reconstruction system, the sensors are designed so that the recovery of
the signal(s) of interest is possible. For instance, when considering the sparse recovery problem, one tries
to find the sparsest solution x̂ ∈ KN from the noisy measurements y = Ax + e ∈ Km and m N . Here
K denotes the field R or C. This is done by solving the mathematical program
x̂ := argmin kzk0 ,
subject to kAz − yk2 ≤ η.
(`0 -min)
This problem is NP-Hard and usually only approximately solved, for instance by solving its convex
relaxation, known as the Basis Pursuit denoising
x̂ := argmin kzk1 ,
subject to kAz − yk2 ≤ η.
(BPDN)
It is known that for a given complexity (usually measured as the sparsity) s of the signal x, the number
b to be a good enough
of random subgaussian linear measurements needs to grow as m & s log(N/s) for x
approximation to x. Said differently, if the design of a sensor can be made at will, then knowing the
complexity of the signal, here characterized by the sparsity, is sufficient for a stable and robust recovery.
This paper looks at the problem of sampling potentially highly non-sparse signals when the quality of the
sensors is constrained. We emphasize in passing that throughout this paper, the sought after signal will
always be considered of high-complexity. We use the sparsity or density as a measure of complexity, but
one could consider other models. We investigate problems where the number of measurements m cannot
be chosen based on the complexity of the signals to recover. In the context described above, one would
have a limit on the sparsity of the vectors that can be recovered by s . m/ log(N/m). These constraints
can be due to many reasons such as cost – e.g. using 10 sensors at a coarser resolution is cheaper than
one at the finest –, frequency rate – sensors at 2000 THz might not exists for a while –, legal regulation –
e.g. in nuclear medicine where one should not expose a patient to too high radiations at once. Problems
arise when the signals being sampled are too dense for the usual mathematical theories. When one thinks
about compressed sensing, the size of the sensor required is driven by a certain measure of complexity
of the signals considered. Allowing for the recovery of signals with higher level of complexity entails the
use of better sensors. Here we look at the problem differently: first, we assume constraints on the sensor
design which are fixed due to some outside reasons. Under these assumptions, we take on the following
challenge: split the information carried by the signal in a clever way so that a mathematical recovery is
possible.
This paper revisits the theory of fusion frames and applies it to the dense signal recovery problem.
We show that by using advanced mathematical techniques stemming from applied harmonic analysis, it
is possible to handle very high complexity signals in an efficient and stable manner. Before we dig into
Date: February 23, 2018.
1
2
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
the more technical details, we present some real-world scenarios where our framework appears useful, if
not essential.
1.1. Examples.
1.1.1. Unavailability of high quality observation devices. A typical time-invariant bounded linear operator
is always represented by a circulant matrix A. So suppose A represents a sensing device whose number
of rows m is physically limited by the sampling rate (or resolution) of the device. Suppose also that
the sparsity of the sampled signal x is substantially larger than what a single observation by A could
handle/recover by various compressed sensing techniques.
In this context, the limitations on the sensing devices combined with the (potentially) high number
of non-zeros in the signals makes it impossible for a state-of-the-art algorithm to recover the unknown
signal x. As illustrated in Figure 1, we suggest to apply n such devices in parallel after prefiltering.
The fused compressed sensing technique introduced later allows to resolve the problem that otherwise
a single device can not! Such scenarios actually exist and show the necessity of the fused compressed
sensing technique presented below.
For example, suppose an application requires a sensing device of capacity X, described by a sensing
matrix Ã. In case such a device is either very expensive, or not available, we may choose to combine
n parallel projections {Pj }nj=1 prior to measuring, and use n low-quality sensing devices of capacity
1
n X, each described by the sensing matrix A. The (sparse) signal x is then subsequently recovered by
various techniques via each channel and, through the theory of fusion frames [13, 14, 11], merged into a
single P
vector. As long as {Pj }nj=1 are projections - or any filtering operations - with the property that
CI ≤ i Pj∗ Pj ≤ DI for some 0 < C ≤ D < ∞, such a fusion operation is always possible.
x
P1
A
y1 = AP1 x
P2
A
y2 = AP2 x
Pn
A
yn = APn x
Figure 1. Sparse linear array geometry
In order for the fusion operator to be bounded away from 0, in our work we assume that the prefiltering/projections Pi are complete in the sense that there won’t be “holes” in the signal coverage for
a whole class of signals; more precisely, we require that the collection of projections satisfy the fusion
frame inequality (6).
Evidently, if we design such a fused compressed sensing technique, by enabling the subdivision of
sparsity of x into individual subspaces, the sparse recovery problem becomes a feasible one and can be
resolved by multiple sensing devices with low quality or resolution, which are not only widely available
but also economical.
The value of fused compressed sensing techniques presented in this paper is clearly reflected in this
situation where an otherwise too expensive or impossible problem can now be resolved by using a number
of lower resolution/sampling rate devices and by making a reasonable number of observations, and
processed by the fusion frame theory.
1.1.2. SAR imaging and spatial filtering. In the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imaging process, a
flying carrier (an airplane or a satellite) emits a sequence of radio waves to the field of observation (and
then detects the reflections by the objects in the field). Each radio wave is sent through an antenna with
a fixed aperture/size which physically presents an antenna beam (magnetic field) pattern, say {Fi }.
Consequently, as seen in Figure 2, during the ith data collection, the antenna beam pattern Fi physically implements a spatial filtering operator. And, naturally, between adjacent i’s (even among several
adjacent i’s), the spatial antenna beams Fi ’s have intentional overlaps. The actual data observation,
for each i, is modeled by y(i) = AFi x, where x is the field image refection coefficients that eventually
form the SAR image of the field, and A is a fixed observation matrix determined by the SAR imaging
mechanism, which is typically chirping (linearly changing frequencies in time) functions in two different
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
3
Flight path/direction
Synthetic Aperture
Fi+4
Fi+3
Fi+2
Fi+1
Fi
Ground Range
Figure 2. Synthetic Aperture Imaging beam and data collection mechanism
dimensions [19, 25, 18]. This formulation has a natural “distributed sparsity” due to the spatial filtering
operations inherent to the physical beams.
Here, to consider the spatial filtering effect, and to avoid the conventional ad-hoc “alignment” in the
flight direction, the fused SAR imaging process needs to be considered [35]. The new fused SAR imaging
formulation is not only the should-be rigorous mathematical formulation of the SAR imaging process,
but also potentially beneficial to image resolution and to the robustness of the (often) turbulent data
collection process.
1.2. Contributions. In this paper we combine mathematical tools from compressed sensing and fusion
frame theory to break the limitations on the signal complexity induced by traditional recovery methods.
Our general approach can be described as the two following steps, or summarized in Algorithm 1.
d
(i) , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n by any sparse recovery method, and
1) Estimate the local information x
P
n
d
(i) , either directly or by virtue of the frame
b = S −1
2) Approximate the fused solution x
x
i=1
algorithm.
P
Data: (Pi )1≤i≤n , n such that CI ≤ |Pi k22→2 ≤ DI, an estimation of the measurement noise η
Result: An estimation x̂ of the vector x
k ← 1;
b = 0;
x
while k ≤ n do
Measure k th vector y ← APk x + e(k) ;
b←x
b + argmin kzk1 s.t. kAPk z − y(k) k2 ≤ η;
Add local information x
k ←k+1
end
b ← S −1 x
b
Fusion: x
Algorithm 1: Fused distributed sensing recovery framework
Note that the fusion operation either requires the inverse frame operator S −1 or can be approximated
using the (fusion-) frame algorithm, described at the end of Subsection 2.2. An important aspect of the
framework is that it can either be used sequentially or in a parallel manner. In the sequential approach,
we get the local pieces of information one after the other. In this case, as described in Algorithm 1,
we have no need to save the local measurements and can update our guess in an online fashion. In the
parallel approach, the local measurements are processed independently of each other, and the fusion is
done by a central unit, once all the local information have been collected.
In particular, Proposition 4 later in the manuscript shows that the robustness is preserved independently from the number of subspaces considered, which can be phrased in simple terms as:
Proposition 1. Let A ∈ Km×N , and let W = (Wi , Pi )ni=1 , n ≥ 1 be a fusion frame. Assume the
measurement vectors y(i) = APi x+e(i) are corrupted by some (adversarial) independent noise uniformly
b satisfies
bounded ke(i) k2 ≤ η. Then our solution x
bk22 ≤ Kη 2 .
kx − x
(1)
4
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
In the more precise statement (Proposition 4), we specify precisely the value of the constant K = 1/C
where C denotes the lower frame bound.
As a special case of Theorem 9, we proved the following
Theorem 1. Let W = (Wi , Pi )ni=1 be a fusion frame system for KN with frame operator S and frame
bounds 0 < C ≤ D < ∞. Let A ∈ Km×N be a matrix satisfying some Partial RIP condition (see
Definition 6) . Any s distributed-sparse vector x whose sparsity is uniformly distributed among the n
subspaces (i.e. si = s/n is the sparsity of Pi x) can be recovered as
!
n
X
−1
d
(i)
b=S
x
x
,
i=1
d
(i) are obtained as solutions to the n local sparse recovery problems
where the x
d
(i) := argmin kzk ,
x
subject to kAPi z − y(i) k2 ≤ ηi .
0
Moreover, assuming
the errors to be uniformly bounded by η, and that the RIP constants δ1 = δ2 = · · · =
√
δn = δ < 4/ 41 are the same in all the subspaces, the solution approximate the true vector x in the
following sense:
n
kb
x − xk2 ≤ Cη
C
√
960 2
where η := maxi ηi and C ≤ (16−41δ
2 )2 is a constant depending only on δ.
Note that under the usual compressed sensing assumptions, this allows to have a number of measurements per sampled vector that decay linearly with the number of sensors.
The paper is articulated as follows. We review basics from compressed sensing and fusion frames
in Section 2. In Section 3 we explore several theoretical examples to motivate our research, and to
emphasize the importance of our findings. Our claims are empirically verified by numerical results. In
the flair of traditional compressed sensing, we extend the standard compressed sensing results to the
case of recovery where we make explicit use of local redundancy in the fusion frame decomposition in
Section 5. Finally, Section 4 derives a mathematical theory allowing to work with fusion frames where
sparsity is exploited along a subspace decomposition. These findings extend the traditional compressed
sensing problem [24] and show some similarities with recent developments in parallel acquisition [17] and
structured sensing [10].
2. General tools and models
2.1. (Traditional) Compressed sensing. Compressed sensing (CS) relies (see [24, 22] and references
therein) on the inherent sparsity of natural signals x for their recovery from seemingly few measurements
y = Ax + e for some linear measurement matrix A ∈ Km×N , with m N . Here the vector e ∈ Km
contains the noise and is usually assumed to be bounded, kek2 ≤ η. With the sparsity assumption, CS
aims at finding (approximate) solutions to the (`0 -min) problem. General recovery guarantees ensure that
the recovery is stable and robust, that is, the solution satisfies the following Lebesgue-type inequalities
C
kb
x − xk2 ≤ √ σs (x)1 + Dη,
(2)
s
√
kb
x − xk1 ≤ Cσs (x)1 + D sη,
(3)
where σs (x)1 := argminz:kzk0 ≤s kx − zk1 defines the best s-term approximation of x in the `1 norm.
Plethora of conditions (some of which we look closer in Section 4) on A have been derived to ensure
that
√ the previous (or similar)
√ estimates hold. These are based on restricted isometry constants (δ2s <
2 − 1 [12] or δ2s < 4/ 41 [24], δs < 1/3), null space properties (A fulfills the robust and stable
NSP(s, ρ, τ ) if kvS k1 ≤ ρkvS k1 + τ kAvk2 for any vector v ∈ KN , and S any index set with |S| ≤ s),
coherence (µ1 (s) + µ1 (s − 1) < 1), quotient property, and so on. Similar conditions and bounds can be
found when greedy and thresholding algorithms are used to approximate (`0 -min) (see [6, 23, 8, 7, 36, 31]
for some relatively recent results in this direction).
However, to ensure such recovery bounds, there is still a need for building adequate sensing matrices
A. So far, no deterministic matrices A can be built with reasonable numbers of rows (i.e. with decent,
small enough, number of measurements) and we have to rely on randomness to build measurement
matrices. It has been shown, for instance, that matrices with independent random subgaussian entries
fulfill the RIP(s, δ) provided that the number of measurements scales as m δ −2 s log(N/s) [5]. Similar
results have been obtained (with different log factors) for structured random matrices or matrices from
bounded orthonormal systems, see [32] for instance.
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
5
2.2. Frames, fusion frames, and distributed signal processing. By definition, a sequence F =
{fi }i∈I in a Hilbert space H is a frame [16] for H if there exist 0 < A ≤ B < ∞ (lower and upper frame
bounds) such that
X
Akf k2 ≤
|hf, fi i|2 ≤ Bkf k2 for all f ∈ H.
(4)
i∈I
The representation space associated with F is `2 (I) and its analysis and synthesis operators are respectively given by
X
T (f ) = {hf, fi i}i∈I and T ∗ ({ci }i∈I ) =
ci fi ,
i∈I
2
for all f ∈ H and {ci }i∈I ∈ ` (I). It shows that the frame operator S := T ∗ T is a positive, self-adjoint
and invertible operator; this means that recovery of any f ∈ H is possible, if Sf is known; however,
computing S −1 can be computationally challenging. Luckily, each frame F is accompanied by at least
one so-called dual frame G = {gi }i∈I , which satisfies
X
X
f=
hf, fi igi =
hf, gi ifi for all f ∈ H,
(5)
i∈I
i∈I
and ensures recovery of the function f . Whenever a frame is A-tight (A = B), the problem of function
reconstruction is simplified, since the frame operator S in this case is a scalar multiple of the identity
operator.
Fusion frames (FF) have been initially created [13] to model the setting of a wireless sensor network. Sensor networks are composed of wireless sensors with constraints in their processing power and
transmission bandwidth, which reduces the costs but also affects the precision of the system. The sensors
are distributed over a significantly large area of interest, to measure, for instance, pollution, temperature,
sound, pressure, motion etc. The network is redundant, i.e., there is no orthogonality among sensors,
so each sensor can be interpreted as a frame element. In addition, a large sensor network is split into
redundant sub-networks; the local measurements within each sub-network are sent to a local sub-station,
which submits the gathered information further to a central processing station for final reconstruction.
Every (local) sensor is represented by a single frame vector; that is, each sub-network is related to a
frame for a subspace in a Hilbert space. The subspaces have to satisfy a certain overlapping property,
which ensures that the overlaps are not too large. The reconstruction in such a system is done in two
steps: first, within each subspace the conventional frame reconstruction is employed; then, the local
pieces of information serve as the inputs for the fusion frame reconstruction, which reconstructs the
initial signal completely.
Definition 1 (Fusion frames). Given an index set I, let W := {Wi | i ∈ I} be a family of closed subspaces
in H. We denote the orthogonal projections1 onto Wi by Pi . Then W is a fusion frame, if there exist
C, D > 0 such that
X
Ckf k2 ≤
kPi (f )k2 ≤ Dkf k2 for all f ∈ H.
(6)
i∈I
Remark 1. Fusion framesP
are often accompanied by respective weights. In the weighted case, the frame
condition reads Ckf k2 ≤ i∈I vi2 kPi (f )k2 ≤ Dkf k2 for all f ∈ H and some positive weights (vi )i∈I . All
(unweighted) results derived below apply mutatis mutandis to the weighted case.
Given a fusion frame W for a Hilbert space H, let Fi := {fij | j ∈ Ji } be a frame for Wi , i ∈ I. Then
{(Wi , Fi ) |i ∈ I} is a FF system for H. The following theorem [13] illustrates the relationship between
the local and global properties of a FF:
Theorem 2. For each i ∈ I, let Wi be a closed subspace of H, and let Fi = {fij | j ∈ Ji } be a frame for
Wi , with frame bounds Ai , Bi . If 0 < A = inf i∈I Ai ≤ supi∈I Bi = B < ∞, then the following conditions
are equivalent:
• ∪i∈I {fij | j ∈ Ji } is a frame for H.
• {Wi }i∈I is a fusion frame for H.
In particular, if {(Wi , Fi )}i∈I is a fusion frame system for H with frame bounds C and D, then
∪i∈I {fij | j ∈ Ji } is a frame for H with frame bounds AC and BD.
1 an operator P is an orthogonal projection if P 2 = P and P ∗ = P
6
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
In the fusion frame theory, an input signal is represented by a collection of vector coefficients that
represent the projection onto each subspace. The representation space used in this setting is
!
X
⊕Wi
= {{fi }i∈I | fi ∈ Wi }
i∈I
`2
2
with {kfi k}i∈I ∈ ` (I).
The analysis operator T is then defined by
T (f ) := {Pi (f )}i∈I for all f ∈ H,
P
while its adjoint operator is the synthesis operator T ∗ :
i∈I ⊕Wi `2 → H, defined by
!
X
X
T ∗ (f ) =
fi , where f = {fi }i∈I ∈
⊕Wi
.
i
i∈I
`2
The fusion frame operator S = T ∗ T is given by
S(f ) =
X
Pi (f ).
i∈I
It is easy to verify that S is a positive and invertible operator on H. In particular, it holds CI ≤ S ≤ DI,
with I denoting the identity.
If the dual frames Gi , i ∈ I, for each local frames are known then the fusion frame operator can be
expressed in terms of the local (dual) frames [14]:
X
X
S=
TG∗i TFi =
TF∗i TGi .
i∈I
i∈I
For computational needs, we may only consider the fusion frame operator in finite frame settings,
where the fusion frame operator becomes a sum of matrices of each subspace frame operator. The
evaluation of the fusion frame operator S and its inverse S −1 in finite frame settings are conveniently
straightforward. By Fi we denote the frame matrices formed by the frame vectors from Fi , in a columnby-column format. Let Gi be defined in the same way from the dual frame {gij }j∈Ji . Then the fusion
frame operator is
X
X
S(f ) =
Fi GTi f =
Gi FiT f.
i∈I
i∈I
Hence a distributed fusion processing is feasible in an elegant way, since the reconstruction formula for
all f ∈ H is
X
f=
S −1 Pi (f ).
i∈I
The standard distributed fusion procedure uses the local projections of each subspace. In this procedure, the local reconstruction takes place first in each subspace Wi , and the inverse fusion frame is
applied to each local reconstruction and combined together:
X
X
X
f=
S −1 Pi (f ) =
S −1
hf, fij igij for all f ∈ H.
(7)
i∈I
i∈I
j∈Ji
Alternatively, one may use a global-like reconstruction procedure, which is possible if the coefficients of
signal/function decompositions are available:
XX
f=
hf, fij i(S −1 gij ) for all f ∈ H.
(8)
i∈I j∈Ji
The difference in procedure (8), compared with a global frame reconstruction lies in the fact that the
(global) dual frame {S −1 gij } is first calculated at the local level, and then fused into the global dual
frame by applying the inverse fusion frame operator. This potentially makes the evaluation of (global)
duals much more efficient.
As stated above, computing the inverse (fusion) frame operator is often a challenging task. Instead,
b by employing the so-called frame algorithm. All we need to start the
one can approximate the solution x
iterative algorithm is Sb
x, which we already have. We recall the relevant result below for completeness.
Proposition 2. [14] Let (Wi )i∈I be a fusion frame in KN , with fusion frame operator S = SW , and
fusion frame bounds C, D. Further, let x ∈ KN , and define the sequence (xk ) by x0 = 0 and xk = xk−1 +
k
D−C
2
S(x−x
),
k
≥
1.
Then
we
have
x
=
lim
x
,
with
the
error
estimate
kx−x
k
≤
kxk.
k−1
k→∞
k
k
C+D
D+C
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
7
Concretely, using the fusion frame reconstruction, the updates read
n
n
2 Xd
2 X
xk = xk−1 +
x(i) +
Pi xk−1 .
C + D i=1
C + D i=1
The middle term is computed once and for all. The following updates then only require some basic
2
b0 = 0 yields x
b1 = C+D
Sb
x.
matrix-vector multiplications. Note that starting the algorithm with x
P
d
−1
(j)
b =S
b via the iterative
Similarly, in Section 5, we have x
, and fb = Db
x. We can find x
jx
P d
2
2
(j)
c0 = 0, x
c1 = C+D
approach of Proposition 2, by starting the algorithm with x
S(b
x) = C+D
j S x , and
so on. The n−th term approximation of fb is then estimated with fbn = Db
xn .
2.3. Signal recovery in fusion frames. This work describes an approach for sensing and reconstructing signals in a fusion frame structure. As presented above, given some local information x(i) := Pi (x),
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, a vector can easily be reconstructed by applying the inverse fusion frame operator
!
n
n
X
X
x := S −1 S(x) = S −1
Pi (x) = S −1
x(i) , where x(i) := Pi (x), for 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
(9)
i=1
i=1
Throughout the work, we assume that the projected vectors are sampled independently from one another,
with n devices modeled by the same sensing matrix A. Formally, the problem is as follows From the
d
(i) of the local information to compute the
measurements y(i) = Ax(i) + e(i) , reconstruct an estimation x
b of the signal x.
approximation x
From this point on, there are two ways of thinking about the problem. In a first scenario, the signals
are measured in the subspace and the recovery of the x(i) are done locally. In other words, it accounts
for solving n (`0 -min) problems (or their approximations via (BPDN) for instance) in the subspaces, and
then transmitting the estimated local signals to a central unit taking care of the fusion via Equation (9).
The other approach consists of transmitting the local observations y(i) = APi x to a central processing
station which takes care of the whole reconstruction process. In this case, the vector x can be recovered
by solving a unique (`0 -min) problem directly with, letting In denote the n dimensional identity matrix,
(1)
y
P1
y = ... = In ⊗ A ... x
(10)
y(n)
Pn
While the latter case is interesting on its own (see for instance [17]), we investigate here some results
for the first case. Our results can be investigated and generalized further, integrating ideas where the
measurements matrix (here, the sensors) vary locally, as is the case in [17] or driven with some structured
acquisition (see for instance [10]).
We would like to put our work in context. This paper is not the first one to describe the use of fusion
frames in sparse signal recovery. However, it is inherently different from previous works in [9, 3]. In [9]
the authors provide a framework for recovering sparse fusion frame coefficients. In other words, given
a fusion frame system {(Wi , Pi )}ni=1 a vector is represented on this fusion frame as a set of n vectors
(x(i) )ni=1 where each of the x(i) corresponds to the coefficient vector in subspace Wi . The main idea
of the authors is that the original signal may only lie in few of the n subspaces, implying that most of
the x(i) should be 0. To rephrase the problem, we can say that the vector has to lie in a sparse subset
of the original fusion frame. While [9] is concerned with some recovery guarantees under (fusion-) RIP
and average case analysis, the paper [3] gives uniform results for subgaussian measurements and derive
results on the minimum number of vector measurements required for robust and stable recovery.
We, on the other hand, exploit structures (or sparsity) locally2. We do not ask that only a few of the
subspaces be active for a given signal, but that the signal only has a few active components per subspace.
This justifies the use of the local properties of fusion frame systems.
3. Examples and applications
This section introduces some theoretical examples where the application of our fusion frame-based
recovery shows increased performance over traditional recovery techniques. In particular, we justify in
Proposition 4 that the fusion frame recovery may provide better robustness against noise.
2This sparsity assumption is needed only when a given frame component has a large dimension. We hope that in most of
the cases we can control this dimension to be small enough avoiding the necessity of sparse assumptions. See the following
section for more details.
8
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
3.1. Orthogonal canonical projections. Consider the problem of recovering x ∈ KN from the measurements:
y(i) = Ai x + e(i) , 1 ≤ i ≤ n,
where Ai ’s are defined as Ai = APi and Pi is the orthogonal projection onto Ωi , with Ωi ⊆ {1, · · · , N }.
We assume that the noise vectors e(i) are uncorrelated and independent, with ke(i) k2 ≤ ηi . A corresponds
to a matrix of linear measurements in Km×N . Note that this framework is an example of recovery from
Multiple Measurement Vectors (MMV ) (see [20, 28, 33] and references therein) where the signal is the
same in every measurements, and the matrices are different for each set of measurements. We consider
the problem of recovering local vectors x(i) , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, where the x(i) are defined as x(i) := Pi x. In
this case, we have that the sparsity of each local signal is at most Ni := rank(Pi ) = |Ωi |. Once the local
d
(i) are recovered, the original signal x can be estimated from a fusion frame like
pieces of information x
reconstruction:
!
n
n
X
X
−1
d
d
(i) ,
b=S
x
x(i) =
S −1 x
(11)
i=1
i=1
Pn
where the fusion frame operator S is defined in the usual way as S : KN → KN , S(x) = i=1 Pi (x).
The problem is to recover the unknown vector x from the measurements {yS(i) }ni=1 by solving local
n
problems. Clearly, a necessary condition for uniform recovery is that we have i=1 Ωi = {1, · · · , N } in
a deterministic setting, or with high probability in a probabilistic setting.
The main idea of our approach is to solve the (very) high-dimensional, high-complexity, and demanding
problem y = Ax + e by combining results obtained from n problems that are much easier to solve. We
investigate first the case where the
Sn orthogonal projections do not overlap, i.e. Ωi ∩ Ωj = ∅, for any
i, j ∈ {1, · · · , n} with i 6= j and i=1 Ωi = {1, · · · , N }. The results developed are reminiscent of some
work on partial sparse recovery, when part of the support is already known [4]. In a second step we
analyze the use of random and deterministic projections that may overlap for the recovery of the signal
x.
Remark 2. It is important to pause here and understand the problem above. Knowing the support of
the projections, one could work on the local vectors x(i) of smaller sizes Ni < N . Doing this would allow
faster computations of the solutions but also has the implication that the sparsity (per subspace) has to
remain small. On the other hand, considering large vectors with many zero components allows to keep a
sparsity rather large (compared to the subspace dimension). We choose to investigate mainly the latter
case as we try to break the limitation on the complexity for a given sensing matrix.
3.1.1. Decomposition via direct sums. It is clear that the dimension N of the ambient space will play
an important role. Indeed, if we consider no overlap between the projections, we have two drastically
different extreme cases. These scenarios are important as they shed light on the main ideas behind our
recovery results.
Case n = N This case is characterized by (up to a permutation of the indices) Ωi = {i} for all
1 ≤ i ≤ N . In other words, each (set of) measurements y(i) = APi x + e(i) gives information about a
single entry xi of the input vector x via an overdetermined linear system. In this case, assuming A has
full rank, we can compute an estimate xbi of the entry xi as the solution to the `2 minimization problem:
xbi := argminx∈R ky(i) − xai k22 =
aTi y(i)
aTi ai
(12)
where ai denotes the ith column of the matrix A. The N independent `2 minimizations ensure that the
b satisfies the bound
final solution x
v
v
uN
uN
N
uX |hai , e(i) i|2
uX ke(i) k2
X
ke(i) k2
2
t
t
bk2 =
≤
≤
.
(13)
kx − x
4
2
kai k2
kai k2
kai k2
i=1
i=1
i=1
In particular, in the noiseless scenario (e(i) = 0, for all i), the recovery is exact. In terms of (normalized)
matrices from Gaussian measurements, which ensures that A has full rank – even numerically – with
P
(i)
bk2 ≤ N
high-probability [15, 34], it holds Ekai k2 = 1 and it follows Ekx − x
i=1 ke k2 .
m×N
Notice that even though we have only one fixed matrix A ∈ K
, (obviously) we are no longer
limited to the recovery of sparse vectors, which is the motivation for using fusion frames as described
below. However, this has a price as the (actual) number of measurements drastically increased to m · N .
This is clearly too many measurements in any practical scenarios, but with similar ideas, we can reach
practical applications such as using multiple lower sampling rate devices in order to resolve a harder
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
9
problem, typically required for much higher rate of sampling devices (see Section 1.1.1). Note also that
all the results here should be put in the context of MMV problems, and not with the usual CS setup.
Case n = 2 We consider now two sets Ω1 and Ω2 such that Ω1 ∪ Ω2 = {1, · · · , N } and Ω1 ∩ Ω2 = ∅.
Without loss of generality we can assume that Ω1 = {1, · · · , N1 } and Ω2 = {N1 + 1, · · · , N1 + N2 } with
N1 + N2 = N . We measure twice the unknown vector x as y(1) = A1 x + e(1) = AP1 x + e(1) and
y(2) = A2 x + e(2) = AP2 x + e(2) . If both N1 and N2 are smaller than m, then two `2 minimizations
d
d
(1) and x
(2) independently and it follows that the solution x
(1) + x
(2) obeys the following
b = xd
recover xd
error bound:
(1) 2
(2) 2
kb
x − xk22 ≤ kA+
k2 + kA+
k2 .
(14)
Ω1 e
Ω2 e
The reconstruction is again perfect in the noiseless case. Moreover, as in the previous case, there is no
need for a sparsity assumption on the original vector x. The oversampling ratio is not very large as we
only have a total of 2m measurements.
If however one at least of N1 or N2 (say N1 ) is larger than m then we need to use other tools as we
are now solving an underdetermined linear system. Driven by ideas from CS, we can assume the vector
to be sparse on Ω1 . The recovery problem becomes
(1) that minimizes kzk ,
Find xd
subject to kA z − y(1) k ≤ η
(15)
1
1
2
1
1
The ` minimization problem is introduced as a convex relaxation of the NP-hard `0 minimization.
Note that the constraints apply only on the support Ω1 of the unknown vector. Hence the usual sparsity
requirements encountered in the CS literature need not to apply to the whole vector. Unfortunately,
the sparsity assumption being applied independently on Ω1 and/or Ω2 restricts ourselves to non-uniform
recovery guarantees only, at least when considering the full set of sparse signals. The following definition
will become handy in the analysis.
Definition 2 (Partial null space property). A matrix A ∈ Km×N is said to satisfy a partial robust and
stable null space property of order s with respect to a subset Ω ⊂ {1, · · · , N } with N ≥ |Ω| > m, P the
orthogonal projection onto Ω, and constants 0 < ρ < 1, 0 < τ if
k(P v)S k1 ≤ ρk(P v)S̄ k1 + τ kAvk2
(16)
holds for any vector v and any set S ⊂ Ω such that |S| ≤ s.
Remark 3. The previous definition is a weakening of the usual robust null space property, where what
happens in the complement of the set Ω is irrelevant. It is worth noticing that it also coincides with the
usual definition when Ω = {1, · · · , N }.
The partial robust null space property of the measurement matrix A on Ω1 ensures that the recovered
(1) obeys the following error bound [24, Theorem 4.19]:
local vector xd
4τ
2(1 + ρ)
σs (x(1) )1 +
ke(1) k2 .
(17)
1−ρ
1−ρ
Equation (17) is obtained by modifying the proofs of [24, Theorem 4.19, Lemma 4.15] and adapting them
to the presence of the projection P1 . A formal proof of a more general statement is given in the proof of
the later Theorem 6. This yields the following direct consequence
(1) − P xk ≤
kxd
1
1
Proposition 3. Let N and m be positive integers with N > m and A ∈ Km×N . There exist two integers
N1 and N2 such that, up to a permutation, Ω1 = {1, · · · , N1 } and Ω2 = {N1 + 1, · · · N1 + N2 }. Assume
that N2 ≤ m and N1 > m. Assume that the matrix A satisfies the partial robust null space property
of order s with respect to Ω1 with constants 0 < ρ < 1 and τ > 0 and that AΩ2 has full rank. For
d
d
d
(1) + x
(2) with x
(1) solution to Problem (15) and x
(2) solution to the overdetermined
b := xd
x ∈ KN , let x
2
` minimization problem on Ω2 . Then the solution obeys:
4τ
2(1 + ρ)
(2)
bk2 ≤ kA+
σs (x(1) )1 +
ke(1) k2 .
(18)
kx − x
k2 +
Ω2 e
1−ρ
1−ρ
Moreover, the total number of measurements amounts to 2m for the recovery of an N2 + s sparse vector.
Recovering the vector x(2) does not create any problem, as long as the pseudo-inverse has a reasonable
` norm, i.e. as soon as the rank of the projection is reasonably small (see discussion below and Theorem 3
in particular). The recovery of the vector x(1) ∈ KN is ensured provided the number of subgaussian
measurements m scales as [24, Corollary 9.34]
2
m & 2s ln(eN/s) 1 + ρ−1 .
(19)
2
Proposition 3 slightly reformulated yields the following result:
10
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
Corollary 1. Let A := AP1 + AP2 ∈ Km×N with Ω1 ∩ Ω2 = ∅ and Ω1 ∪ Ω2 = {1, · · · , N } and
N1 = |Ω1 |, N2 = |Ω2 |. If A is a subgaussian matrix and AΩ2 has full rank, then provided that
2
m & 2s ln(eN/s) 1 + ρ−1 ,
N2
1
any vector x ∈ Θ := ΣN
⊂ ΣN
s +K
s+N2 can be recovered with the bound (18).
1
Here, ΣN
denotes the set of s sparse vectors in KN1 . The previous Corollary provides a uniform
s
recovery result, on the proviso on the model for the vector x.
3.1.2. Controlled deterministic projections. We look here at a scenario where the sets Ωi (and hence
the projections Pi ) are completely and deterministically controlled. We consider an integer n > 0 and
subsets Ωi ⊂ {1, · · · , N } with |Ωi | = Ni , ∪ni=1 Ωi = {1, · · · , N } and Ni ≤ m, and assume again that A
has full rank. In this case, we can always enforce the disjointness of the support Ωi ∩ Ωj = ∅, for any
i 6= j. This yields the trivial recovery of the input signal from its local information vectors:
b :=
x
n
X
d
(i) .
x
(20)
i=1
Here, all the local vectors are recovered via generalized Moore-Penrose pseudo inverses of the sub-matrices
AΩi composed of only the columns supported on Ωi :
d
(i) = A+ y(i) = x(i) + A+ e(i) .
x
Ωi
Ωi
(21)
The error estimate follows directly:
bk22 ≤
kx − x
n
X
(i) 2
kA+
Ωi e k2
(22)
i=1
Note that it holds kA+ ek2 ≤ kA+ k2→2 kek2 and that kA+ k2→2 = 1/ min1≤i≤r (σi ), with r the rank of
A and {σi }ri=1 its singular values. As a consequence, when dealing with “nice” matrices, the bound (22) is
reasonable. In a CS setup, normalized sensing matrices generated at random from a Gaussian distribution
have the property of being well-behaved, as suggested by [24, Theorem 9.26]:
e be its variance-normalized
e be an m × s Gaussian matrix with m > s and A := √1 A
Theorem 3. Let A
m
counterpart. Then for t > 0,
p
mt2
P σmax (A) ≥ 1 + s/m + t ≤ e− 2
p
mt2
P σmin (A) ≤ 1 − s/m − t ≤ e− 2 ,
where σmax (Θ) and σmin (Θ) are the maximum and the minimum singular values of Θ, respectively.
For small projection ranks, and A as in Theorem 3, it holds s ≤ r < m, and therefore P(kA+
Ωi k2→2 ≥
2
√1 r ) ≤ e−mt /2 which justifies that the bound (22) is small.
1−
m −t
3.1.3. Rank-controlled projections. This scenario differs from the previous one by the fact that we may
control only the ranks Ni ’s of the projections but let the support of projections be random. This example
is motivated by the SAR applications where the rank of the projections is controlled by the aperture and
resolution of the sensing device. In this case, for uniform recovery of any vector x we need to ensure that,
with high probability, the whole support {1, · · · , N } is covered by the random projections. We assume
that all the projections have the same rank r for simplicity of calculations, but similar ideas apply if
variations in the rank of the projections were needed. We pick uniformly at random n sets Ωi of size r
in {1, · · · , N }. It holds
n
N −r
n
.
(23)
P ∃i ∈ {1, · · · , N } : i ∈
/ Ω := ∪nj=1 Ωj = N P [1 ∈
/ Ω] = N (P [1 ∈
/ Ω1 ]) = N
N
This gives that P ∃i ∈ {1, · · · , N } : i ∈
/ Ω := ∪nj=1 Ωj ≤ ε whenever
n≥
This direct consequence follows.
log(N/ε)
.
log(N/(N − r))
(24)
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
11
Proposition 4. Let A ∈ Km×N with m < N , r ≤ m, ε > 0, and n be such that Equation (24)
holds. In addition, assume that every submatrix with r columns extracted from A has full rank. Let
Ω1 , Ω2 , · · · , Ωn be n subsets in {1, · · · , N } of size r chosen independently and uniformly at random.
P
d
(i) from the measurements
b := S −1 ni=1 x
Any vector x recovered from the fusion of local recovery as x
(i)
(i)
y = APi x + e , 1 ≤ i ≤ n satisfies, with probability at least 1 − ε
n
1 X
(i) 2
bk22 ≤
kA+
kx − x
(25)
Ωi e k2
C i=1
Pn
d
(i) := A+ y(i) and C denotes the lower frame bound of S.
where S(x) := i=1 Pi x and x
Ωi
The lower frame bound is defined for general fusion frame operators as in Definition 1. The error
bound above is applicable in case of any fusion/filtering scenario. In our particular set-up, we calculate
exactly this bound.
Lemma
1. Given n projections Pi of rank r, the lower frame bound of the fusion frame operator S :=
P
Pi is given by
C := min M(k) =: M,
(26)
1≤k≤N
where M(k) is the multiplicity of index k. Formally, let Γk := {j : 1 ≤ j ≤ n : k ∈ Ωj }, then
M(k) := |Γk |.
Proof. That C ≤ M is clear. Indeed, let x = ek0 where kP
0 is one of the indices achieving the minimum
ek0 denotes the canonical vector. Then it holds S(ek0 ) = j∈Γk ek0 and it follows that kS(x)k22 ≤ M2 .
0
PN
On the other hand, for any x ∈ KN , the fusion frame operator can be rewritten as S(x) = i=1 M(i)xi .
PN
Consequently it holds that for any x ∈ KN , kS(x)k22 ≥ M2 i=1 |xi |2 and hence C 2 ≥ M2 .
As a consequence, it is trivial to see that for any 1 ≤ k ≤ N , M(k) is a non-decreasing function of
the number of projections n. Hence, the greater the number of projections (the redundancy, in fusion
frame terms) the greater the bound C and therefore the smaller the error in the recovery according to
Equation (25). This however can only hold true, as long as the noise per measurement vectors remains
small.
Note that in the case of subsets selected independently uniformly at random, we can have a precise
statement. The lower frame bound is defined as the minimum number of occurrences of any index
k ∈ {1, · · · , N }. Let us consider M(k) and Γk as in the previous lemma. Let k ∈ {1, · · · , N } be any
index and Ωj denote a draw of a random set. It holds P[k ∈ Ωj ] = r/N . The subsets being independent
of each other, M(k) is a binomial random variable with probability of success P = r/N for each of the
n trials. It follows that P[M(k) = l] = nl P l (1 − P )n−l for all 1 ≤ k ≤ N and 1 ≤ l ≤ n.
Putting everything together, we get that C :=
min M(k) is a random variable such that
k∈{1,··· ,N }
P[C ≥ l] = P[∀1 ≤ k ≤ N, M(k) ≥ l]
N
l−1
X
N
N
= (P[M(k) ≥ l]) = 1 −
P[M(k) = j] = (1 − F (l − 1, n, P )) .
(27)
(28)
j=1
These expressions resemble the calculations involved in Equations (23) and (24), however with a much
more complicated probability distribution. To avoid unnecessarily tedious calculations that would infer
the readability of the paper, we choose to leave the following result as a conjecture.
Conjecture 1. Let Ω1 , Ω2 , · · · , Ωn be n subsets of r elements taken uniformly at random in {1, · · · , N }.
Let Γk := {j : 1 ≤ j ≤ n : k ∈ Ωj }, and M(k) := |Γk |. Then C := min1≤k≤N M(k) =: M grows at least
linearly with n, i.e., there exists constants c > 0 and b ≥ 0, independent of n, such that
E[C] ≥ cn − b.
(29)
0
A direct consequence of this is that one can always find a multiplicative constant c ≤ c such that
for a number of projections n ≥ b/(c − c0 ), E[C] ≥ c0 n (the case c = c0 can only be true for b = 0, in
which case, there is no need for this remark). Though the proof is not given, the result is backed up with
numerical results shown in Figure 3.3 The graphs always show the expected linear growth, independently
of the parameters of the problem.
3It
is also backed up with particular cases, when the ranks are exactly half
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1135253/mean-value-of-minimum-of-binomial-variables
the
dimension,
see
12
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
35
35
N = 10000
N = 1000
25
20
15
10
5
0
N = 10000
N = 1000
30
Average lower frame bound
Average lower frame bound
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
0
Oversampling ratio
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Oversampling ratio
(a) Large projections
(b) Small projections
Figure 3. Linear growth of the expectation of the lower frame bound for various use
cases. The averages are calculated from 300 random experiments. The left graphs show
the average lower frame bound when dealing with rather large projections (with rank
r = N/2) while the right graphs are in the case of much smaller projections (r = N/5).
The oversampling ratio is calculated as a linear function of the number of projections
and is independent of the ambient dimension N ; ζ = rn/N .
Assuming the conjecture to be true, Equation (25) then simplifies to
n
δν
1 X
(i) 2
kA+
Ekb
x − xk22 ≤ 0
Ωi e k2 ≤ 0 ,
c n i=1
c
(30)
where the expectation is taken over the draw of the projections, for a certain constant c0 > 0, where we
(i) 2
let δ = maxi kA+
Ωi k2→2 and ν := maxi ke k2 . It shows that at least in expectation, the error should
not grow as the number of measurements increases. Moreover, numerical results illustrated in Figure 5
suggest that the expected reconstruction error decreases. An intuition for this behavior is provided in a
simple example in Equations (34) and (35). From a compressed sensing perspective, it has been shown
that the least favorable case appears as the case when the vectors are repeated again and again. This
translates in our scenario to the case where the increase of the measurements consist solely in repeating
the same projections. Considering the example of a SAR imaging process developed in Section 1.1.2,
this would correspond to a plane flying over a given region multiple times, with the spatial filtering being
exactly the same.
Remark 4. It is important to note here that there is no sparsity assumption. It is possible to recover
any vector x with high probability, as long as the number of measurement vector scales reasonably with
the dimension of the input space.
3.1.4. Constrained number of measurements and ranks of projections. In certain scenarios, the physical
measurement devices limit our freedom in choosing the ranks and size of the measurements. We hence
deal here with fixed ranks Ni ’s for the projections Pi . Assume, without loss of generality, that the first
0 ≤ k ≤ n projections have ranked lower than the number of measurements m. For these subspaces,
the usual `2 minimization procedure yields perfect (or optimal in the noisy case) recovery of the local
information x(i) , for 1 ≤ i ≤ k. For the remaining n − k subspaces, the pseudo-inverse is not sufficient,
and we use tools from CS. We here again use the partial robust null space property from Definition 2 on
every subspace Ωj , for k + 1 ≤ j ≤ n. Combining results from Propositions 4 and 3 yields the following
direct corollary as a consequence:
Corollary 2. Let m < N and A ∈ Km×N . Assume that we are given a set of n sets {Ωi }ni=1 in
{1, · · · , N } of respective sizes {Ni }ni=1 with N1 ≤ N2 ≤ · · · Nn . Assume in addition that ∪i Ωi =
{1, · · · , N }. Moreover, there exists a unique 0 ≤ k ≤ n such that Nk ≤ m and Nk+1 > m (with
the convention that N0 = 0 and Nn+1 > m). Assume that the submatrices AΩi , for 1 ≤ i ≤ k, have
full rank. If in addition the measurement matrix satisfies a partial robust null space property of order s
P
d
(i) with
b defined as x
b := S −1 ni=1 x
with respect to every subset Ωi , i ≥ k + 1, then, the approximation x
d
d
(i) := A+ y(i) , for 1 ≤ i ≤ k and x
(i) solutions to the `2 constrained `1 minimization problems (BPDN),
x
Ωi
for k + 1 ≤ i ≤ n fulfills the following estimate:
1
bk2 ≤
kx − x
M
k
X
i=1
(i)
kA+
Ωi e k2
n
n
2(1 + ρ) X
4τ X
+
σs (x(i) )1 +
ke(i) k2
1−ρ
1−ρ
i=k+1
i=k+1
!
(31)
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
13
Note that for simplicity we have assumed that the NSP is valid on every subspaces for the same set of
parameters. To avoid notational encumbrance we do not write results where the ρ, τ , and s may depend
on the subspace considered.
Remark 5. This is a direct application of the previous results. It is obtained by recovering every local
pieces of information independently from one another. It is possible to improve these estimates by a
sequential procedure where we first estimate the xj for j ∈ Ωi , for some 1 ≤ i ≤ k, and then using this
reliable estimate to improve the accuracy of the `1 minimization program.
A final remark considers the case where the rank of the projection is also random. We can think of
the sets Ωi , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n as Binomial random variables with probability of success p. In this case, the
rank of the projection Pi if controlled by the expectation of this random variable. An analysis similar to
the previous one can be carried over to ensure recovery of any vector with high probability.
3.2. Numerical examples. This Section describes numerical recovery results on the case described
above. We first show some particular examples of recovery, when dealing with dense signals and show
that we can break the traditional sparsity limit by adding a few sensors. The next example shows the
behavior of the quality of the reconstruction when slowly adding sensors. Finally, the last subsection
validates our Conjecture and show that the noise tends to decrease while adding projections, and that
the overall quality of recovery scales linearly with the noise level. In another contribution, we have
also verified that we can recover a very dense Fourier spectrum, by using our approach with Fourier
measurement matrices, see [1].
(a) Large ranks
(b) Small ranks, small sparsity
(c) Small ranks large sparsity
Figure 4. Examples of fusion reconstruction.
3.2.1. Examples of recovery. The examples of reconstruction depicted on Figures 4 were created by
generating at random s sparse Gaussian vectors with s = 200 for Figures 4(a) and 4(b), and s = 500 for
Figure 4(c). For each cases, the 250 × 600 matrix was generated at random with entries i.i.d. from a
Gaussian distribution. In the first example, the rank is set to r = 300 > m and hence, `1 minimization
(traditional basis pursuit) is used on every subspaces. This yields a total of 13 projections generated at
random. For the two last examples, the ranks of the projections are set to r = 200 < m. In this case,
only a classical `2 inversion is needed on every subspace. Here, since the ranks are smaller, the number
of projections has to be increased to 22 in order to ensure that the whole set {1, · · · , N } is covered with
high probability. By looking carefully at the last example, one can see that an index with non-zero
magnitude has not been selected (around index 520). These cases, however, are rare. In every figure,
the red ’+’ crosses represent the true signal, the blue circles represent the reconstructed signal from
our fusion approach, and the green ’x’ correspond to the reconstruction with traditional basis pursuit.
While the very last set-up (very high number of non-zero components) is clearly not suitable for usual
compressed sensing, the advantage of projections and fusions can be seen even in the fist two (where the
number of non-zeros remains relatively small). Another aspect to look at is that when dealing with small
ranks, the solutions to the `2 minimization problems are computed efficiently. As a consequence, even
b is still orders of magnitude
when the number of projections increases, the calculation of the recovered x
faster.
3.2.2. Recovery and number of projections. Given any scenario introduced above, it is expected from
Conjecture 1 that increasing the number of projections (of a given rank) will increase the lower frame
bound (26) at least linearly. This linear increase of the lower frame bound compensates for the potential
increase in the reconstruction error. One could however hope for better results according to the numerical
14
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
evidence illustrated in Figure 5, where the average case error seems to be reduced as the number of
projections increases. Given a set of n projections generating a fusion frame, the least favorable case,
studied in [21] for the case of a single filtering operation, when adding an extra n projections, is when the
exact same Ωi are repeated. The exact behavior of the reconstruction error with respect to the number
of projections is still under research.
Figure 5. `2 error of recovery for various number of projections.
For a total of 10 generations of random Gaussian matrices of size 300 × 1000, and 10 random Gaussian
200 sparse vectors (note: that is a setting where usual compressed sensing has no recovery guarantees),
we let the number of random projections of rank r = 500 go from 60% up to 5 times the minimum given
by Equation (24) (17 in our setting, for a success of covering the whole input set of ε = 99%). As can be
seen from the figure, the recovery is unlikely to be correct as long as the number of projections remains
small. The trend is generally towards the perfect recovery - though this can only be guarantee with high
accuracy, which explains the little spikes. Moreover, while the maximum might be somewhat bigger, it
appears 1) that it remains within reasonable bounds (depending on the application) and 2) the average
of the error among the 100 tests per number of projections is very small, suggesting that only a few of
the recoveries are off. A way to understand this is to consider the case, where we have two projections
that are slightly overlapping. Given the global set Ω = {1, · · · , N }, assume we split it into Ω1 and Ω2
with some overlap, i.e. Ω = Ω1 ∪ Ω2 and Ω12 := Ω1 ∩ Ω2 6= ∅. We independently solve
d
(i) := argmin kxk
x
1
(i)
s.t. kAPi x − y k2 ≤ ηi
(32)
(33)
for 1 ≤ i ≤ 2. For now we consider only the noiseless case, i.e. ε1 = ε2 = 0 which is equivalent to
d
(i) =
solving two basis pursuit optimization problems. We can decompose the solutions recovered as x
d
d
(i) |
(i)
x
Ωi \Ω12 + x |Ω12 . If we assume, for simplicity of understanding, that the first component is recovered
(1) = x(1) . If however the second component is not recovered accurately, we
exactly, we have that xd
d
d
(2)
(2)
(i) = x(i) + e(i) , for
can write x
= x + e(2) (for further generalizations, we can always write x
(i)
1 ≤ i ≤ n with
0 in case of successful recovery on the set Ωi ). In this very simple example, we
Pne =
have S(x) = i=1 x(i) = x(1) + x(2) . Similarly, the inverse fusion frame operator can be seen as the
point wise empirical average of the evidences (i.e. the local recoveries):
x(1) |Ω12 + x(2) |Ω12
.
(34)
2
Note that the 2 in the denominator denotes the number of times that the indices in Ω12 are picked in
the creation of the (random) projections. In other words, increasing the number of projections increases
potentially the denominator under a given index and hence reduces the error.
e(2) |Ω12
d
(1) + x
(2) − x(1) − x(2) = e(2) |
b − x = S −1 xd
x
(35)
Ω2 \Ω12 +
2
As a consequence, the error (on the set Ω12 ) is bounded by the maximum of the error from every recovery
problem divided by the number of times a particular index appears.
S −1 (x) := x(1) |Ω1 \Ω12 + x(2) |Ω2 \Ω12 +
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
(a) Minimum number of projections
(b) Double number of projections
15
(c) Basis pursuit denoising
Figure 6. Behavior facing noise
3.2.3. Robustness to noise. In the set of experiments illustrated in Figures 6, we have compared the
robustness of our algorithm compared to traditional basis pursuit denoising when dealing with noise. We
have set the parameters in a regime where (BPDN) works for fair comparison. For a 500 dimensional
ambient space and 300 dimensional measurement space, we generated 5 random 80 sparse Gaussian
vectors for each of the 10 randomly generated Gaussian matrices. For every single test, some additive
Gaussian noise with a given `2 norm θ has been added. This means that for the case of the distributed
approach, n independent noise components of norm θ have been added in total; one for each channel.
The figures depict the evolution of the error of the `2 norm when the energy of the noise component
increases. The black line represents the maximum of the error, the blue one the minimum, and the red
one the average over every samples. The left graph shows the result when the number of projections
is exactly set as in Equation (24) while the second one doubles this number. The third figure shows
the result when using the usual Basis Pursuit Denoising. It is important to notice that the higher peak
appearing on the first figure is due to an index with non zero component from the support of the original
vector x not being selected at all during the random projections. This however does not contradict the
high probability of recovery. The improvement in the noise behavior from the first figure to the second
shows how the fusion frame operator tends to average out the local errors to yield a better estimate (as
described in the previous section). Finally, all of the algorithms scale linearly with the norm of the noise
per measurements (as suggested by Equation (25)) and even if the total noise is increased as the number
of projections is increased, the recovery tends to be improved by considering more projections.
4. An extension of traditional compressed sensing
Our results so far ensure that robust and stable recovery of dense signals is possible, by smartly
combining local information. In this section we show that the ideas developed in Section 5 can also be
considered as an extension of the traditional CS. In particular, it gives solid mathematical foundations
to our work. It is important to note that similar ideas have been developed in parallel in [17]. There, the
authors introduced a model similar to (10), albeit asking that the fusion frame be tight with C = D = 1,
but reconstruct the whole signal globally, without the use of the fusion process. Other authors [10] looked
at CS with structured acquisition and structure sparsity. In simple words, they prove that adapting the
sampling matrices to some prior knowledge of the sparsity pattern allowed for larger applicability of the
CS framework.
In this section we describe the recovery of a signal x by means of CS in the local subspaces and fusion
processing. The local pieces of information are computed as solutions to the problems
minx∈KN
s.t.
kzk1
kAPi z − y(i) k2 ≤ ηi .
(P1,η )
In the noiseless case, the problem is solved by the basis pursuit
minx∈KN
s.t.
kzk1
APi z = y(i) .
(P1,0 )
(i) be a solution to the noisy (P
Lemma 2. Let zd
1,η ) or noiseless (P1,0 ) basis pursuit problem. Then
d
(i)
z ∈W.
i
d
d
d be a solution and let z̃ = Pi zd
(i) . Then kz̃k ≤ kz
(i) k + k(I − P )(z
(i) ))k . z̃ being also
Proof. Let z(i)
1
1
i
1
d
d
d
(i)
(i)
(i)
admissible, it follows that kz̃k1 = kz k1 and z = Pi (z )).
16
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
4.1. Signal models and recovery conditions.
4.1.1. Extension of the sparsity model. The traditional sparsity model is not appropriate in this setting.
As an example, let us consider that all the s nonzero components of a vector x fall within a certain
subspace (say W1 ), there is, a priori, no hope to improve the recovery performance compared to a single
sensor/subspace problem. Indeed, in this case, the recovery is ensured (locally) by CS methods if the
number of observations m scales as
m s log(N/s).
Since we are dealing here only with an identical sensing model, this yields a total number of observations
mT scaling as
mT ns log(N/s).
This may be acceptable if we consider only very few subspaces but may explode in certain cases. Therefore
the model of distributed sparsity may be more appropriate.
Definition 3. A signal x ∈ KN is said to be s = (s1 , · · · sn )-distributed sparse with respect to a fusion
frame W = (Wi , Pi )1≤i≤n , if kPi (x)k0 ≤ si , for every 1 ≤ i ≤ n. s is called the sparsity pattern of x
with respect to W.
(W)
We denote by Σs
the set of all s-distributed sparse vectors with respect to the family of subspaces
(Wi )i . We let s = ksk1 denote the global sparsity of the vector, with respect to W. In the case that the
sparsity of the signal is uniformly distributed among the subspaces (si = s/n), the usual CS recovery
guarantees ensure us that
m si log(N/si )
observations per subspace are required for a stable and robust recovery of the signal. This accounts for
a total number of measurements scaling as mT nsi log(N/si ) = s log(N/si ). In other words, we are
able to recover similar sparsities as in the classical CS framework. But in opposition to the classical
theory most of the computations can be easily carried in a distributed setting, where only pieces of the
information are available. Only the fusion process requires all the local information to compute the final
estimation of a signal.
Locally, it only requires solving some very small CS system, which can be done faster than solving the
original one. This is also the findings found in parallel in [17], where it is concluded that the number of
measurements per sensor decreases linearly with the number of sensor. We describe a similar problem,
while looking at it from a different perspective. In particular, we try to find the sparsity patterns that
may be recovered for a given sensor design. The motivation for this problem comes from the applications
in SAR imaging where the sensor is given and the same everywhere, and where we may not have any
control on the number of observations per subspace. As it will become useful later, we also need to
introduce the local best approximations.
Definition 4. Let W = (Wi , Pi )ni=1 be a fusion frame, and let x ∈ KN . For p > 0 and a sparsity pattern
s = (s1 , · · · , sn ) with si ∈ N for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n, the `p errors of best s-term approximations are defined as
the vector
T
σsW (x)p := (σs1 (P1 x), σs2 (P2 x), · · · , σsn (Pn x))
4.1.2. Partial properties. The null space property (NSP) has been used throughout the past decade in
the CS literature as a necessary and sufficient condition for the sparse recovery problem via (`0 -min). A
matrix A is said to satisfy the (robust) null space property with parameters ρ ∈ (0, 1) and τ > 0 relative
to a set S ⊂ {1, · · · , N } if
kvS k1 ≤ ρkvS k1 + τ kAvk2 ,
for all v ∈ KN .
More generally, we say that the matrix A satisfies the NSP of order s if it satisfies the NSP relative to
all sets S such that |S| ≤ s. We extend here this idea to the context of distributed sparsity with respect
to fusion frames, as already mentioned in Definition 2. Here we talk about a sparsity pattern and ask
that the NSP property be valid for all local subspaces up to a certain (local) sparsity level.
Definition 5 (Robust and stable partial null space property (RP-NSP)). Let n be an integer and
W = (Wi , Pi )ni=1 be a frame for KN . Let s = (s1 , · · · , sn ) be a sequence of non negative numbers
representing the sparsity pattern with respect to W. For a number q ≥ 1, a sensing matrix A ∈ Km×N
is said to satisfy the `q -RP-NSP with pattern s with respect to W and with constants ρ1 , · · · , ρn ∈ (0, 1)
and τ1 , · · · , τn > 0 if
ρi
k(Pi v)Si kq ≤ 1−1/q k(Pi v)overlineSi k1 + τi kAvk2 , for all v ∈ KN , 1 ≤ i ≤ n, Si ⊂ Wi , and |Si | ≤ si .
s
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
17
This definition is reminiscent of the work on sparse recovery with partially known support [4]. The
difference here being that there is no need to enforce a condition on the vector v to lie in the range of
the other subspaces. In a sense, this is taken care of by the fusion process and the fact that we have
multiple measurement vectors.
Remark 6. Note that we could simplify the definition by asking that the parameters be uniform and
independent of the local subspace. Namely, introducing τ := max1≤i≤n τi and ρ := max1≤i≤n ρi , the
above definition becomes
ρ
(PWi v)Si q ≤ 1−1/q (PWi v)Si 1 + τ kAvk2 , for all v ∈ KN , 1 ≤ i ≤ n, Si ⊂ Wi , and |Si | ≤ si .
s
A stronger, but easier to verify, condition often used as a sufficient recovery condition is the bynow well known Restricted Isometry Property (RIP). Informally speaking a matrix is said to satisfy the
RIP (s, δ) if it behaves like an isometry (up to a constant δ) on every s-sparse vector v ∈ Σs . Formally
speaking, A ∈ Km×N satisfies RIP (s, δ), for some s ≥ 2 and δ ∈ (0, 1) if
(1 − δ)kvk22 ≤ kAvk22 ≤ (1 + δ)kvk22 ,
for every v ∈ Σs .
(36)
The lowest δ satisfying the inequalities is called the restricted isometry constant. Once again, we want
to derive similar properties on our sensing matrix for the distributed sparse signal model.
Definition 6 (Partial-RIP (P-RIP)). Let W = (Wi , Pi )ni=1 be a fusion frame, and let A ∈ Km×N .
Assume that A satisfies the RIP (si , δi ) on Wi , with δi ∈ (0, 1), i ∈ I = {1, · · · , n}. Then, we say
that A ∈ Km×N satisfies the partial RIP with respect to W, with bounds δ1 , · · · , δn and sparsity pattern
s = (s1 , · · · , sn ).
In other words, A satisfies a P-RIP conditions, if it satisfies RIP-like conditions on every subset of
vectors in range(Pi ).
Remark 7. This definition is consistent with the definition of the classical RIP in the sense that the case
n = 1 (only one projection, one subspace) recovers the usual RIP.
The P-RIP can be written in a form similar to the traditional RIP, Equation (36).
Proposition 5. Let W = (Wi )i∈I be a fusion frame (with frame bounds 0 < C ≤ D < ∞). Let A ∈
Km×N satisfy the P-RIP with respect to W, with bounds δ1 , · · · , δn and sparsity pattern s = (s1 , · · · , sn ),
and let Co = C mini {1 − δi }, Do = D maxi {1 + δi }. Then, for any v ∈ KN ,
X
Co kvk22 ≤
kAvi k22 ≤ Do kvk22 .
i
Proof. Using the fusion frame inequality, and inequalities (36) for all i ∈ I, we obtain
X
X
X
C min{1 − δi }kvk22 ≤ min{1 − δi }
kvi k22 ≤
(1 − δi )kvi k22 ≤
kAvi k22
i
i
≤
X
i
i
(1 + δi )kvi k22 ≤ max{1 + δi }
i
i
X
i
i
kvi k22 ≤ D max{1 + δi }kvk22 .
i
Theorem 4. Let ε > 0. Let W = (Wi , Pi )ni=1 be a fusion frame for KN , N ≥ 1. Let A ∈ Km×N be a
subgaussian matrix with parameters β, k. Then, there exists a constant C = Cβ,k such that the P-RIP
constants of √1m A satisfy δsi ≤ δi , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n with probability at least 1 − ε, provided
m ≥ C min(δ)−2 (max(si ) ln(eN/ max(si )) + ln(2εn))
Before we prove this result, we recall a standard RIP result for subgaussian matrices (Theorem 9.2 in
[24]):
Theorem 5. Let A be an m × N subgaussian random matrix. Then there exists a constant C > 0
(depending only on subgaussian parameters β, k) such that the RIP constant of √1m A satisfies δs ≤ δ
with probability at least 1 − ε, if
m ≥ Cδ −2 s ln(eN/s) + ln(2−1 ) .
18
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
Proof. (of Theorem 4)
For some constants δi ∈ (0, 1), let E be the event “ √1m A does not satisfy P-RIP with respect to W
with constants δ1 , · · · , δn ”. Applying a union bound it follows that
n
n
X
X
P(E) = P(∃i ∈ {1, · · · , n} : δsi > δi ) ≤
P(δsi > δi ) =
εi
i=1
i=1
For some εi such that ε1 + · · · + εn = ε ∈ (0, 1), since the sensing matrix is the same for every sensors,
there exists a unique C > 0 (depending on β, k) such that √1m A satisfies the RIP locally within the
subset Wi and for a sparsity si with constant δsi ≤ δi , provided that m ≥ max1≤i≤n mi , with
mi ≥ Cδi−2 (si ln(eN/si ) + ln(2−1
i )).
Additionally, since the function s → s ln(eN/s) is monotonically increasing on (0, N ) and s N ,
max1≤i≤n mi ≥ C max1≤i≤n δi−2 max1≤i≤n si ln(eN/ max1≤i≤n si ) + ln(2ε−1
i ) . Considering ε1 = · · · =
εn = ε/n concludes the proof.
Note: all Gaussian and Bernoulli random matrices are subgaussian random matrices, so Theorem 4
holds true for Gaussian and Bernoulli random matrices.
4.2. Recovery in general fusion frames settings. With the tools introduced above, we show that
any signals with sparsity pattern s can be recovered in a stable and robust manner via the fusion frame
approach described in the previous sections.
4.2.1. RP-NSP based results. We give a first recovery guarantee based on the robust partial NSP, introduced in Definition 5.
n
Theorem 6. Let A ∈ Km×N and W = (Wi , Pi )i=1 a fusion frame with frame bounds 0 < C ≤ D < ∞
n
and frame operator S. Let y(i) i=1 be the linear measurements y(i) = APi x + e(i) , 1 ≤ i ≤ n for
d
(i) the solution to the local Basis Pursuit
some noise vectors e(i) such that ke(i) k2 ≤ ηi . Denote by x
P
d
(i) . If the matrix A satisfies the `1 -RP-NSP with sparsity pattern
b = S −1
problems (P ) and let x
x
1,η
i
s = (s1 , · · · , sn ) with constants 0 < ρ1 , · · · , ρn < 1 and τ1 , · · · , τn > 0 with respect to W, then the
b approximates x in the following sense:
estimation x
2
h~
ρ, σsW (x)1 i + h~τ , ~η i ,
(37)
kb
x − xk2 ≤
C
n
n
n
1+ρi
2τi
where ρ
~ = 1−ρ
, ~τ = 1−ρ
, and ~η = (ηi )i=1 .
i
i
i=1
i=1
P
n
d
d
(i) with x
(i) the solutions to the
b = S −1
Proof. The solution is given by the fusion process x
i=1 x
local problems (P1,η ). It holds
bk2 = S −1
kx − x
n
X
Pi x −
i=1
n
X
!
≤ C −1
d
(i)
x
i=1
n
X
d
(i)
Pi x − x
i=1
2
≤ C −1
2
n
X
d
(i)
Pi x − x
i=1
.
1
For a particular i ∈ {1, · · · , n}, we estimate the error on the subspace Wi in the `1 sense. We follow the
d
(i) and S ⊂ W
proof techniques from [24, Section 4.3] with the adequate changes. With v := Pi x − x
i
i
1
the set of best si components of x supported on Wi , the ` -RP-NSP yields
k(Pi v)Si k1 ≤ ρi (Pi v)Si
1
+ τi kAvk2 .
Combining with [24, Lemma 4.15] stating
(Pi v)Si
1
d
(i)
≤ Pi x
1
− kPi xk1 + (Pi v)Si
1
+ 2 (Pi x)Si
1
.
we arrive at
(1 − ρi ) (Pi v)Si
1
d
(i) k − kP xk + 2 (P x)
≤ kPi x
1
i
1
i Si
1
+ τi kAvk2 .
Applying once again the `1 -RP-NSP, it holds
kPi vk1 = k(Pi v)Si k1 + (Pi v)Si
1
≤ ρi (Pi v)Si
≤ (1 + ρi ) (Pi v)Si 1 + τi kAvk2
1 + ρi
d
(i) k − kP xk + 2 (P x)
≤
kPi x
1
i
1
i Si
1 − ρi
1
+ τi kAvk2 + (Pi v)Si
1
+
4τi
kAvk2 .
1 − ρi
1
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
19
d
d
d
(i) = x
(i) . x
(i) being the optimal solution to (P
We now remember Lemma 2 and notice that Pi x
1,η ), it
is clear that kb
xk1 ≤ kPi xk1 from what we can conclude that
1 + ρi W
4τi
d
(i)
= kPi vk1 ≤ 2
Pi x − x
σ (x)1,i +
kAvk2 .
1 − ρi s
1 − ρi
1
Summing up the contributions for all i in {1, · · · , n} and applying the inverse frame operator finishes
the proof.
Similarly, assuming `q -RP-NSP, one can adapt the proof techniques from [24, Theorems 4.22, 4.25] to
the local problems. This yields the following result
n
Theorem 7. Let A ∈ Km×N and W = (Wi , Pi )i=1 a fusion frame with frame bounds 0 < C ≤ D < ∞
n
and frame operator S. Let y(i) i=1 be the linear measurements y(i) = APi x + e(i) , 1 ≤ i ≤ n for
d
(i) the solution to the local Basis Pursuit
some noise vectors e(i) such that ke(i) k2 ≤ ηi . Denote by x
P
d
(i) . If the matrix A satisfies the `2 -RP-NSP with sparsity pattern
b = S −1
problems (P ) and let x
x
1,η
i
s = (s1 , · · · , sn ) with constants 0 < ρ1 , · · · , ρn < 1 and τ1 , · · · , τn > 0 with respect to W, then the
b approximates x in the following sense:
estimation x
h~τ , ~η i
ρ, σsW (x)1 i
1 h~
+
, 1 ≤ p ≤ 2,
(38)
kb
x − xkp ≤
C
s1−1/p
s1/2−1/p
n
n
2
n
3−ρ1
i)
where ρ
~ = 2(1+ρ
,
~
τ
=
τ
, and ~η = (ηi )i=1 .
i
1−ρi
1−ρi
i=1
i=1
4.2.2. P-RIP based recovery. One can show that the P-RIP is sufficient for stable and robust recovery
by combining Theorem 6 with the following result, showing the existence of random matrices satisfying
the RP-NSP, from an RIP argument.
m×N
Theorem 8. Let A ∈ K√
be a matrix satisfying the P-RIP(2s,δ), with s = (s1 , · · · , sn ) and δ =
(δ1 , · · · , δn ) and δi < 4/ 41, for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Then, A satisfies the `2 -RP-NSP with constants
(ρi , τi )ni=1 where
<1
ρi := √ δ2i
1−δi −δi /4
√
(39)
i
.
τi := √ 1+δ
2
1−δi −δi /4
Proof. The proof of this results consists in simply applying [24, Theorem 6.13] to every subspaces independently.
From this result and Theorem 7, it follows.
Theorem 9. Let W = (Wi , Pi )ni=1 be a fusion frame for KN with frame operator S and frame bounds
0 < C ≤ D < ∞. Let A ∈ Km×N be a matrix satisfying the P-RIP(2s, δ) where s = (s1 , · · · , sn ) and
√
(W)
can be
δ = (δ1 , · · · , δn ) with δi < 4/ 41, for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Then any distributed-sparse vector x ∈ Σs
recovered by solving n (BPDN) problems.
Assuming the noise in each (BPDN) problem is controlled by ke(i) k2 ≤ ηi , 1 ≤ i ≤ n, and set
Pd
n
(i) . Then
b = S −1 x
vecη = (ηi )i=1 . Let x
kb
x − xk2 ≤
n
1 X σsW (x)1,i
αi √
+ βi η i
C i=1
si
where αi and βi depend only on the RIP constants δi .
5. Local sparsity in general dictionaries and frames
The redundancy inherent to frame structures (and their generalization to frames of subspaces) makes
them appealing to signal analysis task. So far, we have used the redundancy of the fusion frame process
in order to increase the global sparsity of the original vector x as well as increase the robustness to noise.
We investigate now the use of local dictionaries in order to use the redundancy within subspaces, using
the local frames for the representation of the partial information. A common scenario in applications is
when f ∈ H has a sparse frame representation f = Dx, i.e. x is sparse, and the multiple measurements
are given by
y(i) = APi f + e(i) = APi Dx + e(i) , 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
Here Pi can be any projection onto a subspace of H. In practical applications such as in SAR radar
imaging, Pi can just be a projection or spatial filter onto Wi ≡ span{dk }k∈Ωi , where dk is the k th
20
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
column of D. Such an operation can potentially reduce the number of nonzero entries of x in the
ith observation, when the respective column vectors dk are in ker Pi . In particular, let us denote by
Γi ≡ {k | k 6∈ Ωi , dk ∈ Wi }, and Λi ≡ {l | dl ∈ ker Pi }.
Pi f
= Pi Dx = Pi ({dk }k∈Ωi , {dj }j∈Γi , {dl }l∈Λi ) x
xΩi
= ({dk }k∈Ωi , {yj = Pi dj }j∈Γi , {00 s}l∈Λi ) xΓi
xΛi
xΩi
= ({dk }k∈Ωi , {yl = Pi dl }l∈Γi )
xΓi
=
Di x(i) ,
where Di ≡ ({dk }k∈Ωi , {yk = Pi dk }k∈Γi ), and
x(i) ≡
xΩi
xΓi
.
As a result, the ith measurement becomes
y(i) = ADi x(i) + e(i) ,
1 ≤ i ≤ n,
or
y(i) = Af (i) + e(i) ,
f (i) = Di x(i) ,
1 ≤ i ≤ n.
1
Note that the first version suggests the use of ` synthesis methods, while the second one looks at `1
analysis tools. `1 synthesis corresponds to the usual sparse recovery, via a dictionary D:
min kzk0 ,
subject to kADz − yk2 ≤ η.
z
The solution fb is later computed as fb = Db
x. In the `1 analysis approach, we do not care for a particular
(sparse) representation of f . We just ask for this representation to have high fidelity with the data:
min kD∗ gk0 ,
g
subject to kAg − yk2 ≤ η
(40)
Here, D∗ denotes the canonical dual frame. Both approaches are further detailed in the next sections.
We comment that if the choice of Pi is allowed, one strategy is again to use random projections by
randomly selecting the index set Ωi to set the subspaces Wi = span{dj }j∈Ωi .
5.1. Recovery via general `1 -analysis method. As introduced above, we try to recover f that has
a sparse representation by solving Problem (40). While the problem is written in terms of the canonical
dual frame, there is no obligation in using this particular dual frame. One may instead optimize the dual
frame considered and use the sparsity-inducing dual frame [30], computed as part of the optimization
problem:
(i) = argmin
fd
kD̃∗ gk s.t. kAg − y(i) k ≤ η , 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
(41)
∗
g, D D̃i =I
i
1
2
i
The sparsity-inducing frame D̃i can be uniform across all i but not necessarily. The following result is
known to hold for any dual frame [30].
Theorem 10. Let D be a general frame of RN with frame bounds 0 < A ≤ B < ∞. Let D̃ be an
alternative dual frame of D with frame bounds 0 < Ã ≤ B̃ < ∞, and let ρ = s/b. Suppose that the
matrix A satisfies the following D-RIP condition
2
q
q
(42)
1 − ρB B̃ · δs+a + ρB B̃ · δb < 1 − 2 ρB B̃
for some positive integers a and b satisfying 0 < b−a ≤ 3a. Let fb be the solution to the typical `1 -analysis
problem
fb = argming kD̃∗ gk1 s.t. kAg − yk2 ≤ η.
Then
kfb − f k2 ≤ αη + β
kD̃∗ f − (D̃∗ f )si k1
√
,
s
(43)
where α and β are some constants and (D̃∗ f )s denotes the vector consisting the s largest entries in
magnitude of D̃∗ f .
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
21
(i) analyzed with the local
In particular, the bound (43) applied to the local pieces of information fd
∗
frames D̃i , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, obtained as solution to Problem (41) yields the following error bound for the
Pn
(i) :
reconstruct signal fb = S −1 i=1 fd
!
n
n
∗ (i)
∗ (i)
X
X
f
)
k
f
−
(
D̃
k
D̃
s
1
i
i
(i) − f (i) k ≤ αη + β
kfb − f k2 ≤ kS −1 k2→2
,
kfd
√ i
2
si
i=1
i=1
P
where α ≡ supi αi kS −1 k2→2 , η ≡ i ηi , and β ≡ supi βi kS −1 k2→2
√ This bound is reminiscent of the
traditional bounds in CS where the (local) error decays as σs (x)1 / s except that the contributions of
each subspace are added together and normalized by the norm of the inverse frame operator.
5.2. Recovery via `1 synthesis method. The gap between recovery via `1 synthesis and `1 analysis
has long been studied. Interestingly, it can be shown [29] that, when using the sparsity-inducing frames
described above (41), both approaches are equivalent. Denote by D̃i,o the resultant optimal dual frame
and suppose that A satisfies a D-RIP property (42). Then it follows from [29]
(i) − f (i) k ≤ α η + β
kfd
2
i i
i
∗
∗
kD̃i,o
f (i) − (D̃i,o
f (i) )si k1
√
si
P
n
d
(i) ,
for some positive constants αi and βi . Considering the fusion of the local information fb = S −1
i=1 f
the following result holds true:
Proposition 6. Let S be the invertible fusion frame operator. Suppose A satisfies condition (42). Then
the fused solution fb has an error bound given by
!
n
∗
∗
X
kD̃i,o
f (i) − (D̃i,o
f (i) )si k1
kfb − f k2 ≤ αη + β
,
√
si
i=1
P
where α ≡ supi αi kS −1 k2→2 , η ≡ i ηi , and β ≡ supi βi kS −1 k2→2 .
Pn
Pn
Proof. Write f = S −1 Sf = S −1 i=1 Pi f = S −1 i=1 f (i) . Direct computation shows
kfb − f k2
= kS −1
n
X
(i) − f (i) )k
(fd
2
i=1
≤
kS −1 k2→2
n
X
(i) − f (i) )k
k(fd
2
i=1
≤
kS
−1
k2→2
n
X
i=1
∗
∗
kD̃i,o
f (i) − (D̃i,o
f (i) )si k1
αi ηi + βi
√
si
≤ supi αi kS −1 k2→2
n
X
ηi
i=1
n
X
!
+
!
∗
∗
kD̃i,o
f (i) − (D̃i,o
f (i) )si k1
supi βj kS k2→2
.
√
si
i=1
P
The result follows directly by setting α ≡ supi αi kS −1 k2→2 , η ≡ i ηi , and β ≡ supi βj kS −1 k2→2 .
−1
We comment that this result is not surprising due to the equivalence between the two problems
described in this section when dealing with the sparsity-inducing dual frames.
5.3. Wavelet frames and recovery of Doppler signals. This section is intended as an illustrative
example and proof-of-concept of the tools developed so far. In particular, we want to show that using
a fairly poor quality device, we are capable to recover a signal of fairly high complexity. For the sake
of reproducible research, all the experiments presented in this section can be obtained and reproduced
from of the named authors’ Github page4. In this experiment, we try to recover a noisy Doppler signal
(see Fig. 7(a)) using sensors with very few measurements.
To produce the Figures, we have considered a 1024 dimensional noisy Doppler signal (obtained directly
via Matlab’s Wavelet toolbox). We compare a traditional `1 analysis approach, where the sparsifying
4See https://github.com/jlbouchot/FFCS for all the self implemented files. These files require, as described in the
README file, to have the access to a Haar matrix function and to have CVX [26, 27] installed.
22
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
(a) Original noisy Doppler signal
(b) Recovery from a distributed sensing approach – L2 error: 37.18
(c) Reconstruction with an `1 analysis method – L2 error: 82.72
Figure 7. A noisy Doppler signal ( 7(a)) and its reconstructions via a Haar wavelet
frame approach 7(b) and a direct `1 analysis on the Haar system 7(c)
basis is chosen as the Haar system. Similarly, we consider the Haar wavelet systems as subspaces for our
fusion frame approach. Given that a signal s(t) can be decomposed as
X
s(t) = al (t) +
dj (t)
j≥l
where al corresponds to the approximation coefficients at level l and dj corresponds to the details at level
j. We therefore consider our projections Pj to be onto the subspaces of details Wj at each level (using
the usual definition from multiresolution analysis), and a remaining low frequency approximation part.
This gives us (in our setting) a grand total of n = 9 projections, 8 of which (P1 , · · · , P8 ) correspond to
detail coefficients, and the last one (P0 ) corresponds to the low-frequency approximation. This system
being orthogonal, it gives us the easy reconstruction formula
b=
x
8
X
i=0
d
(i) .
x
LOCAL SPARSITY AND RECOVERY OF FUSION FRAME STRUCTURED SIGNALS
23
All the local information are recovered with an `1 analysis procedure, where the sparsifying basis are
precisely chosen to be the Haar wavelets at the appropriate levels. Finally, the sparsity is set uniformly
to 25 on each subspace and a random Gaussian matrix with m = 174 rows is created and some normal
noise with variance 0.05 is added to the measurement vectors, all drawn independently from one another.
Fig. 7(b) shows the reconstructed signal using our `1 -analysis fusion frame approach described in
the previous section, while Fig. 7(c) is the reconstructed signal obtained from a traditional `1 -analysis
approach. Both of them have been reconstructed using measurements obtained from the exact same
matrix. It is important to note however, that we have note tried to optimize our parameters in this
example. In particular, bearing in mind that the subspaces of higher-frequency details have higher
dimensions (in fact, rank(Pj ) = O(2j ), for 1 ≤ j ≤ 8), a better choice would be to set the local sparsity
to be higher in these subspaces to improve our results. This level dependent-sampling is nothing new in
the community and our results corroborate those from other approaches [2]. The Figures clearly show
the reconstruction capabilities of our approach even with a sub-optimal setting and not making use of
any kind of redundancy. Note that mostly the high frequency components of the signal are missing,
which can be overcome by a better setting of the sparsity per subspace.
6. Conclusion
In applications, it may be the case the the sensors limit the complexity of the signals to be recovered.
However, it cannot always be guaranteed that the signals fulfill this complexity requirements. We have
here proposed a novel approach combining fusion frames with local recovery for highly-complex signal
recovery from cheap, low-quality sensors. Motivated by such problems, we are able to prove stable and
robust recovery in a uniform setting in the set of sparsely-distributed signals. This has some interesting
implications. In particular, we verify that the number of measurements required locally is inversely
proportional to the number of sensors. Moreover it is empirically verified that adding more sensors can
add robustness to noise; this is a consequence of the redundancy in the (fusion) frame representation.
By splitting the main high-complexity, dense problems into many subproblems, we recover the local
information stably, robustly, and efficiently by solving a few low-dimensional problems.
Section 5 investigates redundant representations locally, by means of coherent frames. We gave results
on signal recovery via the `1 synthesis and `1 analysis method, in two cases, varying in the use of the
filter projection.
As a last Section, we extend the traditional single-sensor compressed sensing theory to embed this
novel multi-sensor framework. It gives strong mathematical foundations to the approaches presented in
this paper, and reduces to the usual compressed sensing approach when dealing with a single sensor.
Our work differs from that of others as we do not have a requirement on our fusion frame to be tight,
albeit solving the local problems independently.
This work can be further developed by integrating various sensors instead of a single one, repeated n
times. Further real-world applications, for instance in SAR systems, can also be implemented.
Acknowledgment
R. A. is partially supported by the BSU Aspire Research Grant “Frame Theory and Modern Sampling
Strategies” . J.-L. B. thanks the support of the European Research Council through the grant StG 258926
and the organizors as well as the Hausdorff Center for Mathematics for his participation in the Hausdorff
Trimester Program on Mathematics of Signal Processing. S. L. is partially supported by US NSF grants
USA (DMS-1313490, DMS-1010058).
References
[1] R. Aceska, J.-L. Bouchot, and S. Li. Fusion frames and distributed sparsity. Submitted to contemporary Mathematics,
2017.
[2] Ben Adcock, Anders C. Hansen, Clarice Poon, and Bogdan Roman. Breaking the coherence barrier: A new theory for
compressed sensing. In Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, vol. 5. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
[3] U. Ayaz, S. Dirksen, and H. Rauhut. Uniform recovery of fusion frame structured sparse signals. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 41(2):341–361, 2016.
[4] A. S. Bandeira, K. Scheinberg, and L. N. Vicente. On partial sparse recovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.2809, 2013.
[5] R. Baraniuk, M. Davenport, R. DeVore, and M. Wakin. A simple proof of the restricted isometry property for random
matrices. Constructive Approximation, 28(3):253–263, 2008.
[6] T. Blumensath and M. E. Davies. Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing. Applied and Computational
Harmonic Analysis, 27(3):265–274, 2009.
[7] J.-L. Bouchot. A generalized class of hard thresholding algorithms for sparse signal recovery. In Approximation Theory
XIV: San Antonio 2013, pages 45–63. Springer, 2014.
24
ROZA ACESKA, JEAN-LUC BOUCHOT, AND SHIDONG LI
[8] J.-L. Bouchot, S. Foucart, and P. Hitczenko. Hard thresholding pursuit algorithms: number of iterations. Applied and
Computational Harmonic Analysis, page pp in press, 2016.
[9] P. Boufounos, G. Kutyniok, and H. Rauhut. Sparse recovery from combined fusion frame measurements. Information
Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 57(6):3864–3876, 2011.
[10] C. Boyer, J. Bigot, and P. Weiss. Compressed sensing with structured sparsity and structured acquisition. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1505.01619, 2015.
[11] J. Cahill, P. Casazza, and S. Li. Non-orthogonal fusion frames and the sparsity of fusion frame operators. Journal of
Fourier Analysis and Applications, 18, no. 2: 287 – 308, 2012.
[12] E. J. Candès. The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 346(9):589–592, 2008.
[13] P. G. Casazza and G. Kutyniok. Frames of subspaces. Contemporary Mathematics, 345:87–113, 2004.
[14] P. G. Casazza, G. Kutyniok, and S. Li. Fusion frames and distributed processing. Applied and Computational Harmonic
Analysis, 25:114–132, 2008.
[15] Z. Chen and J. J. Dongarra. Condition numbers of Gaussian random matrices. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and
Applications, 27(3):603–620, 2005.
[16] O. Christensen. An introduction to frames and Riesz bases. Springer Science & Business Media, 2003.
[17] I. Y. Chun and B. Adcock. Compressed sensing and parallel acquisition. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
PP(99):1–1, 2017.
[18] I. G. Cumming and F. H.-c. Wong. Digital processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Data. Artech House, 2005.
[19] J. Curlander and R. McDonough. Synthetic Aperture Radar. Wiley Interscience, New York, 1991.
[20] M. F. Duarte, S. Sarvotham, D. Baron, M. B. Wakin, and R. G. Baraniuk. Distributed compressed sensing of jointly
sparse signals. In Asilomar Conf. Signals, Sys., Comput, pages 1537–1541, 2005.
[21] Y. C. Eldar and H. Rauhut. Average case analysis of multichannel sparse recovery using convex relaxation. IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory, 56(1):505–519, 2010.
[22] M. Fornasier and H. Rauhut. Compressive sensing. Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging, pages 187–228,
2011.
[23] S. Foucart. Hard thresholding pursuit: an algorithm for compressive sensing. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis,
49(6):2543–2563, 2011.
[24] S. Foucart and H. Rauhut. A mathematical introduction to compressive sensing. Springer, 2013.
[25] G. Franceschetti and R. Lanari. Synthetic Aperture Radar Processing. CRC Press, 1999.
[26] M. Grant and S. Boyd. CVX: Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming, version 2.1. http://cvxr.com/cvx,
2014.
[27] M. Grant and S. Boyd. Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs, Recent Advances in Learning and
Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pp 95–110, 2008.
[28] R. Gribonval, H. Rauhut, K. Schnass, and P. Vandergheynst. Atoms of all channels, unite! Average case analysis of
multi-channel sparse recovery using greedy algorithms. Journal of Fourier analysis and Applications, 14(5-6):655–687,
2008.
[29] Y. Liu, S. Li, T. Mi, H. Lei, and W. Yu. Performance analysis of `1 -synthesis with coherent frames. In Information
Theory Proceedings (ISIT), 2012 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 2042–2046. IEEE, 2012.
[30] Y. Liu, T. Mi, and S. Li. Compressed sensing with general frames via optimal-dual-based-analysis. Information Theory,
IEEE Transactions on, 58(7):4201–4214, 2012.
[31] D. Needell and J. A. Tropp. Cosamp: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Applied and
Computational Harmonic Analysis, 26(3):301–321, 2009.
[32] H. Rauhut. Compressive sensing and structured random matrices. Theoretical foundations and numerical methods for
sparse recovery, 9:1–92, 2010.
[33] H. Rauhut, K. Schnass, and P. Vandergheynst. Compressed sensing and redundant dictionaries. Information Theory,
IEEE Transactions on, 54(5):2210–2219, 2008.
[34] M. Rudelson and R. Vershynin. Smallest singular value of a random rectangular matrix. Communications on Pure
and Applied Mathematics, 62(12):1707–1739, 2009.
[35] C. Zeng and S. Li. Sparse measurements and fused sar imaging. in preparation, 2015.
[36] T. Zhang. Sparse recovery with orthogonal matching pursuit under rip. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on,
57(9):6215–6221, 2011.
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Ball State University
E-mail address: [email protected]
Chair for Mathematics C (Analysis), RWTH Aachen University
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics, San Francisco State University
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv:1312.0327v1 [math.AC] 2 Dec 2013
Monomial ideals under ideal operations∗
Jin Guo† and Tongsuo Wu‡
Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Jiaotong University
Abstract. In this paper, we show for a monomial ideal I of K[x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ]
that the integral closure I is a monomial ideal of Borel type (Borel-fixed,
strongly stable, lexsegment, or universal lexsegment respectively), if I has the
same property. We also show that the k th symbolic power I (k) of I preserves
the properties of Borel type, Borel-fixed and strongly stable, and I (k) is lexsegment if I is stably lexsegment. For a monomial ideal I and a monomial prime
ideal P , a new ideal J(I, P ) is studied, which also gives a clear description of
the primary decomposition of I (k) . Then a new simplicial complex J △ of a
√
monomial ideal J is defined, and it is shown that IJ △∨ = J. Finally, we
show under an additional weak assumption that a monomial ideal is universal
lexsegment if and only if its polarization is a squarefree strongly stable ideal.
Key Words: Borel type monomial ideal; kth symbolic power; integral
closure; polarization; universal lexsegment monomial ideal
1
Introduction
Throughout the paper, K is an infinite field and let S = K[x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ] be the polynomial ring with n indeterminants over K. If an ideal I is generated by u1 , . . . , us , then we
denote it by I = hu1, . . . , us i. For a monomial ideal I of S, recall that I is called strongly
stable if for any monomial u in I and any i < j ≤ n, xj | u implies xi (u/xj ) ∈ I. Recall
∗
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.
11271250).
†
[email protected]
‡
Corresponding author. [email protected]
that I is called Borel-fixed, if α(u) ∈ I holds for any invertible upper n × n matrix α over
K. Recall that I is called of Borel type if
∞
I : x∞
i = I : hx1 , x2 , . . . , xi i
(∗)
holds for every i = 1, . . . , n. It is known that each strongly stable monomial ideal is Borelfixed, and the converse holds under the additional assumption char(K) = 0. Bayer and
Stillman in [3] noted that Borel-fixed ideals satisfy condition (∗). Herzog et al. in [7] gave
the definition of a Borel type monomial ideal, and they proved among other things that
a Borel type monomial ideal is sequentially Cohen-Macaulay, see also [10]. Furthermore,
there are other two classes of strongly stable monomial ideals, namely, monomial ideals
which are lexsegment or universal lexsegment, see [2] or [6]. We have the following relations
for conditions on a monomial ideal:
universal lexsegment=⇒lexsegment=⇒strongly stable=⇒ Borel-fixed=⇒ of Borel type.
The following is the fundamental characterization of Borel type monomial ideals:
Proposition 1.1. ([6, Proposition 4.2.9]) For a monomial ideal I of S, the following
conditions are equivalent:
(1) I is of Borel type.
(2) For each monomial u ∈ I and all positive integers i, j, s with i < j ≤ n such that
s
xj | u, there exists an integer t ≥ 0 such that xti (u/xsj ) ∈ I.
(3) Each associated prime ideal P of I has the form hx1 , x2 , . . . , xr i for some r ≤ n.
In [4, Proposition 1], Mircea Cimpoeas observed that the afore mentioned property
is preserved under several operations, such as sum, intersection, product, colon. For a
monomial ideal I of Borel type, note that I : m∞ = I : mr holds for√r >> 0, thus the
saturation I : m∞ is a monomial ideal of Borel type. The root ideal I is a prime ideal
of the form hx1 , x2 , . . . , xr i, and is thus universal lexsegment.
Some parts of the following proposition are well known, the others are direct to check,
so we omit the verification.
Proposition 1.2. Let I, J, L be monomial ideals of S.
(1) If further I, J are of Borel type (strongly stable, respectively), then each of the
following is a monomial ideal of Borel type ( strongly stable, respectively):
I ∩ J, I + J, I : L, IJ.
In particular, the saturation I : m∞ of I is of Borel type (strongly stable, respectively) if
I has the same property.
(2) If further I, J are Borel-fixed ideals, then each of I ∩ J, I + J, I : J, IJ is again
Borel-fixed. In particular, the saturation I : m∞ of I is Borel-fixed.
(3) If further I, J are lexsegment (universal lexsegment, respectively) ideals, then each
of I ∩ J, I + J, I : L is again lexsegment (universal lexsegment, respectively).
Let I be a Borel-fixed monomial ideal, and L a monomial ideal which need not to be
Borel-fixed. The following example shows that the colon I : L may be not Borel-fixed.
Example 1.3. Let K be a field with char(K) = 2, and let S = K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. If
I = hx31 , x1 x22 i. It is direct to check that I is Borel-fixed. Set L = hx2 i. It is easy to see
that I : L = hx31 , x1 x2 i, which is not Borel-fixed.
The following example shows that IJ may be not lexsegment, even though I, J are
lexsegment.
Example 1.4. Let S = K[x1 , x2 , x3 ], and let I = hx31 , x21 x2 , x21 x3 , x1 x22 , x1 x2 x3 i. It is easy
to see that I is lexsegment, and u = x21 x22 x23 ∈ I 2 . Note that v = x31 x33 6∈ I 2 and v >lex u,
so I 2 is not lexsegment.
As an application of Proposition 1.2, we now give an alternative proof to the following:
Corollary 1.5. ([6, Proposition 4.3.3]) Let I ⊆ S be a monomial ideal of Borel type.
Then xn , . . . , x1 is an almost regular sequence on S/I.
P roof. In the proof of [6, Lemma 4.3.1], let M = S/I. Then the corresponding N (i.e.,
0 :M m∞ ) is identical with (I : m∞ )/I. Note that M/N ∼
= S/(I : m∞ ) holds. If M = N,
then each element of S1 is almost regular on M since M has finite length. Now assume
M 6= N. Since I : m∞ is monomial of Borel type and m 6∈ Ass(M/N), as is shown in the
proof of the Lemma 4.3.1, it follows by [6, Proposition 4.2.9(d)] that xn 6∈ ∪Ass(M/N),
i.e., xn is in the constructed open set U and thus is almost regular on S/I. The result
then follows by mathematical induction.
2
Integral Closure I
Let I be any ideal of a commutative ring R. Recall from [11] that the integral closure I of
an ideal I consists of all elements of R which are integral over I. Note that I is an ideal
of R. For a monomial ideal I of S, I is generated by all monomials u such that uk ∈ I k
holds for some k > 0. Thus the exponent set of all monomials in I is identical with the
integer lattice points in the convex hull of the exponent set of all monomials in I, see [11,
Proposition 1.4.6]. In this section, we will show that I is a monomial ideal of Borel type
(strongly stable, Borel-fixed, lexsegment, or universal lexsegment respectively), whenever
I has the same property.
Theorem 2.1. Let I be a monomial ideal of S and let I be its integral closure. If I is of
Borel type (strongly stable, Borel-fixed, lexsegment, or universal lexsegment respectively),
then I is also monomial of Borel type (strongly stable, Borel-fixed, lexsegment, or universal
lexsegment respectively).
P roof. (1) Assume that I is monomial of Borel type. Then I is also monomial by [11,
Proposition 1.4.2] (see also [6, Theorem 1.4.2]). In order to prove that I is of Borel type,
we need only to verify that each associated prime ideal of I has the form hx1 , x2 , . . . , xj i
for some 1 ≤ j ≤ n. In fact, let P ∈ Ass(I) and by [6, Corollary 1.3.10], there exists a
monomial v ∈ Mon(S) \ P such that P = I : v. By [6, Theorem 1.4.2], v 6∈ I implies
that v r 6∈ I r holds for all integer r. For any xm ∈ P , clearly vxm ∈ I holds, thus there
exists a positive integer k such that xkm v k ∈ I k . Since I k is also monomial of Borel
type and xkm | xkm v k ∈ I k holds, thus for any 1 ≤ j < m, by [6, Proposition 4.2.9(2)],
there exists an integer t ≥ 0 such that xtj v k ∈ I k . t > 0 holds since v k 6∈ I k . Then
xtj v k−1 ∈ I k : v ⊆ I : v = P . By the choice of v, we have v 6∈ P thus v k−1 6∈ P . Then
xj ∈ P and it shows that I is of Borel type.
(2) Now assume that I is strongly stable. Then for any monomial u ∈ I, there exists
a positive integer k such that uk ∈ I k . If xj | u, then xkj | uk . Assume uk = w1 w2 · · · wk ,
P
in which wi ∈ Mon(S) ∩ I. Assume further that xaj i | wi , where ki=1 ai = k and ai ≥ 0.
Then for any i < j, we have xai i (w1 /xaj i ) ∈ I. Then
k
[xi (u/xj )] =
k
Y
i=1
xai i (wi /xaj i ) ∈ I k ,
thus by [6, Theorem 1.4.2], xi (u/xj ) ∈ I holds. This shows that I is strongly stable.
(3) Assume that I is Borel-fixed. Just as in (2), we assume uk = w1 w2 · · · wk ∈ I k ,
where wi ∈ I. Note that (α(u))k = α(uk ), it will suffice to show that α(uk ) ∈ I k for every
α ∈ B, where B is the set of upper invertible n × n matrices over K. By Proposition
1.2(2), it is clear since I is Borel-fixed.
(4) Assume that I is lexsegment. For each u ∈ I, there exists a positive integer
Qk
Q
aj Qn
at
k
k, such that uk =
Let u = xai i ( i−1
l=1 ul ∈ I .
j=1 xj )( t=i+1 xt ), and let v =
P
P
Q
Q
aj
n
n
n
bt
xbi i ( i−1
t=i at . Assume that ul =
t=i bt =
j=1 xj )( t=i+1 xt ) such that bi > ai and
P
Q
Q
k
n
i−1 alj
alt
ali
xi ( j=1 xj )( t=i+1 xt ) for 1 ≤ l ≤ k. It is easy to see l=1 alj = kaj for 1 ≤ l ≤ n.
Q
In the following, we will show that there exist v1 , . . . , vk ∈ I such that v k = kl=1 vl , which
Q
implies v ∈ I. In fact, we can choose vl under the following rule: If nt=i+1 xat lt = 1, then
Q
Q
alj
′
set vl = ul and vl′ = 1; If nt=i+1 xat lt 6= 1, then set vl = xai li +1 ( i−1
j=1 xj ) · vl , such that
P
Q
Q
′
degree(vl′ ) = degree(ul ) − ij=1 alj − 1 and vl′ | nt=i xbi i / l−1
t=1 vt with the exponent of xi
as small as possible. Note that ai < bi and degree(v) = degree(u), there exist a group of
Q
v1 , . . . , vk such that v k = kl=1 vl .
(5) Assume that I is universal lexsegment. If the minimal generating set of I is
Gmin (I) = {u1 , . . . , um } with u1 > u2 > · · · > um by pure lexicographic order, then
Q
aj −1
there exists a group of positive integers a1 , . . . , am , such that ui = xai i i−1
for each
j=1 xj
α
1 ≤ i ≤ m. Let C(I) be the convex hull of the set of lattice points {α | x ∈ I}. By
Corollary 1.4.3 [6], I = hxα | α ∈ C(I)i. Note that the structure of ui for 1 ≤ i ≤ m, it is
not hard to see that I = I. Hence I is universal lexsegment.
We remark that Theorem 2.1 (1) can also be proved in a similar way as is used in
proving (2) and (3).
√
It
is
known
that
I
⊆
I
⊆
I holds for every ideal of a (noetherian) ring R. Thus
√
√
I = I holds. By the primary decomposition theorem (see [1, 5]), we record
Proposition 2.2. For any ideal I of a noetherian ring R, Min(I) = Min(I) holds, where
Min(I) is the set of all prime ideals minimal over I. In particular, a squarefree monomial
ideal I of S is integrally closed.
k
Proposition 2.3. For a monomial ideal I of S and any integer k ≥ 1, I ⊆ I k holds.
P roof. First, note that
I k = h{u ∈ S | ∃ l such that ul ∈ I kl }i
and
k
I = h{
k
Y
i=1
wi | ∃li , such that wili ∈ I li }i.
Q
k
For every v = ki=1 wi ∈ I with wili ∈ I li (∀i = 1, . . . , k), let l = lcm(l1 , . . . , lk ). Then
Q
wil ∈ I l holds for each i = 1, . . . , k. Thus v l = ki=1 wil ∈ I kl , which implies v ∈ I k .
The converse inclusion does not hold even for squarefree monomial ideals. We include
a counterexample below:
Q
Example 2.4. Let u = 6i=1 xi , and let
I = hx1 x2 x3 , x1 x4 x5 , x2 x4 x6 , x3 x5 x6 i
be a squarefree monomial ideal of S = K[x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 , x5 , x6 ], thus I = I. It is easy to
2
check u ∈
/ I 2 , but u2 ∈ (I 2 )2 holds and hence u ∈ I 2 . Thus I 2 6⊆ I .
3
The k th symbolic power I (k) of an ideal I
Let I be any ideal of a noetherian ring R. It follows from [5, Corllary 2.19] that Min(I) =
Min(I k ) holds for all positive integer k, thus ∪ Min(I k ) = Min(I). Recall that for each
k≥1
P ∈ Min(I), ker(R 7→ (R/I)P ) is the P -primary component of I, and it depends only
on I and P in an irredundant primary decomposition of I. If
Ik =
∩
Q(P )
P ∈Ass(I k )
is an irredundant primary decomposition of I k , then Q(P ) = ker(R → (R/I k )P ) holds
for each P ∈ Min(I k ), and
∩
Q(P ) is independent of the primary decomposition
P ∈M in(I k )
k
of I . Recall that
I (k) =
∩
ker(R → (R/I k )P )
P ∈M in(I)
th
is called the k symbolic power of I.
By [8, Section 3],
I (k) = I k : (∩P ∈Ass∗ (I)\M in(I) P )∞ ,
where Ass∗ (I) = ∪ Ass(I k ). Thus it follows from Proposition 1.2 that if I is monomial
k≥0
of Borel type, then so is I (k) . In the following, we will give a direct and alternative proof
to the fact. We need some preparations.
Definition 3.1. Let B be a nonempty subset of [n]. For any monomial u = xa11 xa22 · · · xann ,
P
aj is called the B-degree of the monomial u. An ideal I is called B-graded if fi ∈ I
j∈B
holds for the B-graded decomposition f = f0 + f1 + · · · + fk of each f ∈ I, where fi is the
B-degree i component of f .
It is easy to check the following property.
Lemma 3.2. If I is a monomial ideal, then for every subset B of [n], I is B-graded.
Let A be a subset of [n]. For a monomial u = xα ∈ S with α = (a1 , . . . , an ), denote
α(A) = (b1 , · · · , bn ), where
b = a if i ∈ A,
i
i
(1)
bi = 0 if i ∈ [n] \ A.
Denote u(A) = xα(A) . We also denote M(A) = {u(A) | u ∈ M} for any nonempty subset
M of Mon(S).
For a prime ideal P and an ideal I of S, denote
J(I, P ) = {f ∈ S | ∃ g ∈ S \ P, such that f g ∈ I}.
Note that J(I, P ) = ker(S → (S/I)P ). For a monomial ideal I, let G(I) (Gmin (I)) be its
(minimal) generating set of monomials, and denote I(A) = Gmin (I)(A) for a subset A of
[n].
Proposition 3.3. Let I and P be monomial ideals of S. If P is a prime ideal, then
J(I, P ) is a monomial ideal. Furthermore,
I(XP ) = {u(XP ) | u ∈ Gmin (I)}
is a monomial generating set of J(I, P ), where XP = {i ∈ [n] | xi ∈ P }. In particular,
|Gmin (J(I, P ))| ≤ |Gmin (I)|.
P roof. Assume P = hxi1 , · · · , xit i and let XP = {i1 , . . . , it }. First, we will show that
J(I, P ) is a monomial ideal. For any f ∈ J(I, P ) and any g ∈ S \ P such that f g ∈ I,
let f = f0 + f1 + · · · + fm and g = g0 + g1 + · · · + gl be their XP -graded decompositions.
Then
X
(f g)r =
fi gj .
i+j=r
It follows that f0 g0 = (f g)0 ∈ I since I is a XP -graded ideal by Lemma 3.2.
We will prove that Supp(f ) ⊆ J(I, P ) holds by induction on the graded component
number m of f . Since Supp(f0 ) ⊆ Supp(f ), it will suffice to show that supp(f0 ) ⊆ J(I, P )
holds. For this purpose, let f0 = u1 + · · · + us and g0 = v1 + · · · + vc , where
Supp(f0) = {ui | 1 ≤ i ≤ s}, Supp(g0 ) = {vj | 1 ≤ j ≤ c},
u1 < u2 < · · · < us and vj < vj+1 under a suitable monomial order. Then it follows that
u1 v1 ∈ I holds since I is a monomial ideal.
Note that v1 has degree 0 under the XP -grading, thus v1 6∈ P and hence u1 v1 ∈ I
implies u1 ∈ J(I, P ). Since
u1 v1 g0 + (u2 + · · · + us )v1 g0 = f0 g0 v1 ∈ I,
it follows that (u2 + · · · + us )v1 g0 ∈ I. Note that both v1 and g0 have degree 0 under the
XP -grading, so does v1 g0 . It follows by induction that Supp(f0 ) ⊆ J(I, P ) holds. This
proves that J(I, P ) is a monomial ideal.
For the second statement, for a monomial u ∈ I(XP ), there exists a v ∈ Gmin (I),
such that u = v(XP ). Note that v(XP )v([n] \ XP ) = v ∈ I, and v([n] \ XP ) ∈ S \ P ,
so u = v(XP ) ∈ J(I, P ). On the other hand, if a monomial u ∈ J(I, P ), then there
exists a monomial w ∈ S \ P , such that uw ∈ I. Note that u(XP ) = (uw)(XP ), there
exits a monomial v ∈ Gmin (I), such that v|uw, and hence v(XP )|u(XP ). Thus J(I, P ) is
generated by I(XP ).
The last statement is clear.
Corollary 3.4. Let P = hxi1 , · · · , xik i with xj ∈
/ P and xt ∈ P for every t < j. If a
monomial ideal I is of Borel type, then for every monomial u ∈ Gmin (J(I, P )), xl ∤ u for
each l ≥ j. In particular, if x1 6∈ P , then J(I, P ) = S.
P roof. Let B = {1, · · · , j − 1}. It will suffice to show that for every u ∈ I, there exists
a t ≥ 0, such that u(B)xtj ∈ I. But this is easy to check whenever I is of Borel type.
Note that the above conclusion is still true when I is Borel-fixed, strongly stable,
lexsegment, or universal lexsegment.
By Proposition 3.3 and Corollary 3.4, the following proposition can be checked directly,
so we omit part of the proof.
Proposition 3.5. Let P be a monomial prime ideal. If I is of Borel type (strongly stable,
Borel-fixed, lexsegment, or universal lexsegment respectively), then J(I, P ) is of Borel type
(strongly stable, Borel-fixed, lexsegment, or universal lexsegment respectively).
P roof. We only prove the case when I is of Borel type. Let P = hxi1 , · · · , xik i with
xj ∈
/ P and xt ∈ P for every t < j. Denote XP = {t | xt ∈ P } and B = {1, · · · , j − 1}.
Clearly, B ⊆ XP . For a monomial u ∈ Gmin (J(I, P )), by Corollary 3.4 and the definition
of J(I, P ), there exists a monomial w ∈ S \ P , such that uw ∈ I and (uw)(B) = u. For
every pair of m < l, if xl |u, then there exists a ≥ 0 such that xam (uw/xl ) ∈ I, since I is of
Borel type. Let y = xam (uw/xl ) and note that
y(XP ) = y(B) = xam (u/xl ),
hence xam (u/xl ) ∈ J(I, P ).
Note that for a universal lexsegment ideal I, depth(S/I) = n − |Gmin (I)|, see [9]. By
Proposition 3.5, J(I, P ) is also universal lexsegment. In order to consider the depth of
S/J(I, P ), we need J(I, P ) to be a proper ideal of S.
Lemma 3.6. For a monomial ideal I and a monomial prime ideal P of S, I ⊆ P holds
if and only if I(XP ) generates a proper ideal of S, i.e., J(I, P ) is a proper ideal of S.
P roof. If P = hxi1 , · · · , xik i and is prime over I, then for each monomial u ∈ I ⊆ P ,
u(XP ) 6= 1, hence hI(XP )i =
6 S. On the other hand, if a prime ideal Q does not contain
I, then there exists a monomial v ∈ I \ Q, such that xj ∤ v for every j ∈ XQ . Thus
v(XQ ) = 1, and hence hI(XQ )i = S. This completes the proof.
By Proposition 3.3, Proposition 3.5 and Lemma 3.6, the following corollary is direct
to check, so we omit the proof.
Corollary 3.7. Let I be a monomial ideal, and P a monomial prime ideal containing I.
If further I is universal lexsegment, then depth(S/I) ≤ depth(S/J(I, P )) holds. Furthermore, the identity holds true if and only if {x1 , . . . , x|Gmin (I)| } ⊆ P .
Now we are ready to prove the afore mentioned result:
Theorem 3.8. Let I be a monomial ideal of S. If I is strongly stable (Borel-fixed, or of
Borel type, respectively), then the k th symbolic power I (k) is also a monomial ideal which
is strongly stable (Borel-fixed, or of Borel type, respectively).
P roof. First we claim that I (k) is a monomial ideal. This can follow from the primary
decomposition theorem (see e.g., [5, Theorem 3.10]), together with [6, Theorem 1.3.1 and
Proposition 1.3.7]. For any P ∈ Min(I), note also that
ker(R → (R/I k )P ) = J(I k , P ),
thus gives a direct proof to the fact.
Note that I k is strongly stable (Borel-fixed, or of Borel type, respectively), if I is
strongly stable (Borel-fixed, or of Borel type, respectively). Hence for every P ∈ Min(I),
ker(R → (R/I k )P ) = J(I k , P ) implies that it is strongly stable (Borel-fixed, or of Borel
type, respectively) by Proposition 3.5. Thus
I (k) = ∩P ∈M in(I) ker(R → (R/I k )P )
is strongly stable (Borel-fixed, or of Borel type, respectively) by Proposition 1.2.
We remark that for a lexsegment ideal I, I (k) may be not lexsegment.
Example 3.9. Let S = K[x1 , x2 , x3 ], and let I = hx1 , x2 i. Clearly, I is universal lexsegment. But I (2) = I 2 = hx21 , x1 x2 , x22 i is not lexsegment.
In the following, we will show that there exists a class of ideals whose symbolic powers
are lexsegment.
Definition 3.10. A monomial ideal I is called stably lexsegment ideal, if I k is lexsegment
for each k > 0.
Example 3.9 also shows that a universal lexsegment ideal may be not stably lexsegment.
The following proposition shows that a stably lexsegment ideal may be not universal
lexsegment. We omit the proof.
Proposition 3.11. Let S = K[x1 , x2 ]. If I is a lexsegment ideal of S, then I is stably
lexsegment.
Even though I being lexsegment does not imply I (k) being lexsegment, we have the
following conclusion.
Proposition 3.12. If I is a stably lexsegment ideal of S, then I (k) is lexsegment for each
positive integer k.
P roof. If I is stably lexsegment, then I k is lexsegment for each positive integer k. By
Proposition 3.5, for each monomial prime ideal P , J(I k , P ) is lexsegment. By Proposition
1.2, I (k) = ∩P ∈M in(I) J(I k , P ) is lexsegment.
We end this section with a general result on I (k) for an ideal I in a Noetherian ring,
and will improve the result for monomial ideals in section 4.
Proposition 3.13. Let I be any ideal of a noetherian ring R. For each P ∈ Min(I), let
Q(P ) be the primary component of the isolated prime ideal P of I. Then
(1)
∩ Q(P )k ⊆ I (k) ⊆
∩ Q(P )(k) holds true.
P ∈M in(I)
k
P ∈M in(I)
(2) If Q(P ) is primary for each P ∈ Min(I), then I (k) =
∩
Q(P )k .
P ∈M in(I)
k
(3) For any positive integer k, I (k) = I k if and only if Ass(I ) ⊆ Ass(I) holds.
P roof. (1) Let I =
∩
Q(P ) be any irredundant primary decomposition of I. For
P ∈Ass(I)
any P ∈ Min(I) and any P1 ∈ Ass(I) \ {P }, there exists an element u ∈ P1 \ P . Thus
um ∈ Q(P1 ) \ P holds for some m ≥ 1. Thus Q(P1 )SP = SP and hence ISP = Q(P )SP .
Then I k SP = Q(P )k SP and hence Q(P )k ⊆ Ker(R → (R/I k )P ). This shows
Q(P )k ⊆ I (k) .
∩
P ∈M in(I)
On the other hand, for any r ∈ Ker(R → (R/I k )P ), there exists an element s 6∈ P
such that sr ∈ I k . Then sr ∈ Q(P )k ⊆ Q(P )(k) . Since Q(P )(k) is P -primary, it follows
that r ∈ Q(P )(k) . This shows I (k) ⊆
∩ Q(P )(k) .
P ∈M in(I)
(2) This follows from (1).
(3) Consider an irredundant primary decomposition
Ik =
∩
Q(P )
P ∈Ass(I k )
of I k . Since Min(I) = Min(I k ) ⊆ Ass(I k ) always holds and
I (k) =
∩
P ∈M in(I k )
Q(P ),
it follows that I k = I (k) holds if and only if Min(I k ) = Ass(I k ), and the latter holds if
and only if Ass(I k ) ⊆ Ass(I).
We remark that Min(Q(P )k ) = {P } and in fact
Q(P )(k) = ker[R → (R/Q(P )k )P ],
see [13, Theorem 23, page 232].
Corollary 3.14. ([6, Proposition 1.4.4]) Let I be a squarefree monomial ideal of a polynomial ring K[x1 , . . . , xn ] over a field K. Then for any k,
I (k) =
∩
P k.
P ∈M in(I)
P roof. For a squarefree monomials ideal I, Ass(I) = Min(I) and for each P ∈ Min(I),
we have Q(P ) = P = hxi1 , . . . , xir i. Then it is easy to verify that hxi1 , . . . , xir ik is P primary, and the result follows from Proposition 3.13(2).
4
A simplicial complex and a decomposition of I (k)
for a monomial ideal I
In this section, we will use notations established before to improve Proposition 3.13 (1)
for monomial ideals. In doing so, we will define and study a new simplicial complex.
For a subset A of [n], hI(A)i = S if and only if 1 ∈ Gmin (I)(A), and the latter holds
if and only if there exists a monomial xα = xa11 · · · xann ∈ Gmin (I) in which ai 6= 0 implies
i∈
/ A. Thus if B ⊆ A and hI(A)i = S, then clearly hI(B)i = S also holds.
Definition 4.1. For any monomial ideal I of S, there is the following simplicial complex
I△
= {A ⊆ [n] | hI(A)i = S}.
It will be called the eliminating simplicial complex of I.
We remark that a simplicial complex on [n] usually contains all the singletons, but we
do not assume this condition. By Lemma 3.6, it is easy to prove the following proposition.
Proposition 4.2. If I is a monomial ideal of S, then Min(I) = {PB | B ∈ N (I △)},
where N (I △) consists of the minimal nonfaces of I △ and PB = h{xi | i ∈ B}i.
√
In the following, we will consider about the radical ideal I of I. Note that for a
√
monomial ideal u and a subset B of [n], u(B) = 1 if and only if u(B) = 1. So Lemma
3.6 implies the following well known property.
√
Corollary 4.3. If I is a monomial ideal of S, then √I △ =I △. In particular, Min( I) =
Min(I).
Let J be a monomial ideal of S. Recall from [12, 6] that the Stanley-Reisner ideal
of the simplicial complex J △ is the ideal IJ △ of S, which is generated by the squarefree
Q
monomials xB = i∈B xi with B ∈
/ J △. The Alexander dual of J △, denoted by J △∨ ,
is defined by J △∨ = {[n] \ B | B ∈
/ J △}. It is easy to see that for a subset B of [n],
B ∈ N (J △) if and only if [n] \ B ∈ F (J △∨ ). We have the following observation.
√
Proposition 4.4. If J is a monomial ideal of S, then IJ △∨ = J. In particular, if J is
a squarefree monomial ideal, then IJ △∨ = J.
√
√
P roof. Note that J is squarefree, so J = ∩P ∈M in(√J) P = ∩P ∈M in(J) P by Corollary
4.3. By Proposition 4.2, Min(J) = {PB | B ∈ N (J △)}. Hence the standard primary
decomposition of IJ △∨ is
√
∩ ∨ P[n]\B =
∩ PA =
∩ P = J.
IJ △ ∨ =
B∈F (J △ )
A∈N (J △)
P ∈M in(J)
Note that
√
J = J while J is squarefree, so the second part is clear.
For a monomial u = xα with α = (a1 , · · · , an ), denote A(u) = {i | ai 6= 0}. In the
following, we will show that the inclusions appeared in Proposition 3.13(1) are actually
equalities for a monomial ideal I of S. For this purpose, we need the following Lemmas.
Lemma 4.5. Let I be a monomial ideal of S, and B a subset of [n]. If A(u) ⊆ B ⊆ [n]
holds for each u ∈ Gmin (I), then J(I, PB ) = I.
P roof. By Proposition 3.3, J(I, PB ) = hI(B)i holds. Note also that for each u ∈ Gmin (I),
A(u) ⊆ B holds by assumption, hence u(B) = u holds for every u ∈ Gmin (I). This is
equivalent to saying that J(I, PB ) = I.
Q
In the following lemma, let Gk = { ki=1 ui | ui ∈ G} and set Gk (B) = (Gk )(B).
Lemma 4.6. Let G be a set of monomials of S, and Let B be a subset of [n]. Then for
any positive integer k, the identity hG(B)ik = hGk (B)i holds. In particular, hGk (B)i = S
holds if and only if hG(B)i = S.
P roof. Clearly, we only need to prove the first statement. By definition, both hG(B)ik
and hGk (B)i are monomial ideals of S. On the one hand, for every monomial u ∈ hG(B)ik ,
Q
there exists u1 , · · · , uk ∈ G, such that ki=1 ui (B) | u. Note that
k
Y
ui (B) = (
i=1
k
Y
ui )(B),
i=1
k
Y
i=1
u i ∈ Gk ,
hold, hence u ∈ hGk (B)i. This shows hG(B)ik ⊆ hGk (B)i. The other inclusion follows
from a similar argument.
The following result improved Proposition 3.13 (1) for a monomial ideal I of S. It also
follows from [8, Lemma 3.1]. Below we include a direct and detailed proof.
Theorem 4.7. If I is a monomial ideal of S, then for any positive integer k, the k th
symbolic power is
I (k) =
∩ J(I k , PB ).
B∈N (I △)
Furthermore, J(I, PB )k = J(I, PB )(k) holds for each B ∈ N (I △) and thus
I (k) =
∩
B∈N (I △)
J(I, PB )k =
∩
[ker(S → (S/I)P )]k
P ∈M in(I)
holds.
P roof. The first equality follows from Proposition 4.2 and the definition of I (k) .
For the remaining equalities, use Proposition 4.2 again to have
Min(I) = {PB | B ∈ N (I △)}.
So, the k th symbolic power of I is nothing but
I (k) =
∩
B∈N (I △)
J(I k , PB ).
Note that both I = hG(I)i and I k = h{G(I)}k i clearly holds, so that
J(I k , PB ) = h{G(I)}k (B)i = h{G(I)(B)}k i = J(I, PB )k
also holds by Lemma 4.6. This shows
I (k) =
∩
B∈N (I △)
J(I, PB )k .
For the remaining statement, note that J(I, PB ) is PB -primary with Min(J(I, PB )) =
{PB }. Hence
J(I, PB )(k) =
∩
J(J(I, PB )k , Q) = J(J(I, PB )k , PB )
Q∈M in(J(I,PB ))
holds. Finally, note that A(u) ⊆ B holds for every u ∈ Gmin J(I, PB ), it follows that
J(J(I, PB )k , PB ) = J(I, PB )k , and hence J(I, PB )(k) = J(I, PB )k holds. This completes
the proof.
In the end, we include an example to illustrate Theorem 4.7:
Example 4.8. Let I = hx21 x23 , x1 x2 x23 i. The irredundant primary decomposition of I is
I = hx21 , x2 i∩hx1 i∩hx23 i. Hence Ass(I) = {hx1 i, hx1 , x2 i, hx3 i} and Min(I) = {hx1 i, hx3 i}.
It is easy to check that for each k ≥ 1,
k
2k
k
k+i
k−i+1
I k = h{x1k+i x2k−i x2k
i).
3 | i = 0, 1, . . . , k}i = hx1 i ∩ hx3 i ∩ (∩i=1 hx1 , x2
Hence
k
2 k
I (k) = hxk1 i ∩ hx2k
3 i = hx1 i ∩ hx3 i =
∩
J(I, P )k .
P ∈M in(I)
It is also clear that
∩
J(I, P )(k) = hx1 i(k) ∩ hx23 i(k) = hx1 ik ∩ hx23 ik = I (k) .
P ∈M in(I)
5
Polarization of universal lexsegment monomial ideal
Let I be a monomial ideal of S, and let < be a monomial order on S = K[x1 , . . . , xn ],
such that xn < xn−1 < · · · < x1 . Let Gmin (I) = {u1, . . . , um } be the minimal generating
Q
a
set of I, where ui = nj=1 xj ij for i = 1, . . . , m. Let ai = max{a1i , . . . , ami }. Recall that
the polarization of I is a squarefree monomial ideal T (I) = hv1 , . . . , vm i, where
vi =
aij
n Y
Y
j=1 k=1
xjk
for i = 1, . . . , m. Let ≺ be a monomial order on
T = K[x11 , . . . , x1a1 , . . . , . . . , xn1 , . . . , xnan ]
such that xij ≺ xkl if i > k or if i = k, j > l.
If choose < and ≺ to be the same kind of monomial order(e.g., lexicographic order, pure
lexicographic order or reverse lexicographic order), which satisfies the above convention,
then the polarizing process is order-preserving, i.e., for each pair of u, v ∈ I, u < v if and
only if T (u) ≺ T (v).
Polarization is a powerful tool for studying quite a few important homological and
combinatorial invariants, see, e.g., [6, Corollary 1.6.3]. But unfortunately, the property of
being Borel type can not be kept in almost all cases after the process of polarization, as
the following example shows:
Example 5.1. Consider the strongly stable monomial ideal I = hx31 , x21 x2 , x1 x22 i. After
polarization, it becomes
J = hx11 x12 x13 , x11 x12 x21 , x11 x21 x22 i.
Since J is monomial and homogeneous, it is clear that J is not a Borel type monomial
ideal under any monomial order.
Theorem 5.2. Let I be a monomial ideal with Gmin (I) = {u1 , . . . , um }, where ui =
Qn
aij
and u1 > u2 > · · · > um by pure lexicographic order. Let
j=1 xj
aj = max{a1j , . . . , amj }
for j = 1, . . . , n. Then the following statement are equivalent.
(1) I is universal lexsegment;
Q
aj −1
for i = 1, . . . , m;
(2) ui = xai i i−1
j=1 xj
Q
bm(u)
b
(3) xi (u/xm(u) ) ∈ I holds for each u = nj=1 xjj ∈ I and each i < m(u);
Q
b
b
(4) For any monomial u = nj=1 xjj ∈ I, xi (u/xjj ) ∈ I holds for each pair 0 ≤ i <
j ≤ n with bj > 0.
P roof. (1) ⇔ (2) is well known (see [9]), and (2) ⇒ (3) is clear.
Q
(3) ⇒ (4): For any monomial u = nk=1 xbkk ∈ I and each pair 0 ≤ i < j ≤ n with
Qm(u)−1
Q
bm(u)
bj > 0, xm(u)−1 k=1 xbkk = xm(u)−1 (u/xm(u)
) ∈ I by (3). By induction, xj jk=1 xbkk ∈ I.
Qj−1 bk
Qj−1 bk
b
b
xk | xi (u/xjj ), xi (u/xjj ) ∈ I.
xk ∈ I. Note that xi k=1
By (3) again, xi k=1
Qk−1 aj −1
xj
and
(4) ⇒ (2): It will suffice to show that for each 1 ≤ k ≤ m, uk = xakk j=1
aik = ak −1 for each k +1 ≤ i ≤ m. We will prove it by induction. It is clear that u1 = xa11
under the condition (4), and it is easy to see that ai = 0 implies that aj = 0 for each
j > i. Note that u1 > u2 > · · · > um by pure lexicographic order. Hence we can assume
u2 = xa121 xa222 with a21 < a1 and a22 > 0. Note that x1a21 +1 ∈ I, so a21 = a1 −1. In a similar
way, we get ai1 = a1 − 1 for every i = 2, . . . , m. Now assume that the conclusion holds
Qk−1 aj −1
true for all the integers less than k, and we are going to show that uk = xakk j=1
xj
and aik = ak − 1 holds for each k + 1 ≤ i ≤ m. By inductive assumption,
ui = (
k−1
Y
a −1
xj j )(
j=1
m
Y
a
xj ij )
j=k
holds for each k ≤ i ≤ m. If assume to the contrary that aik < ak − 1 holds for some i,
Qk−1 aj −1
xj ) ∈ I. By the definition of ak , there exists an integer t ≥ k
then w = xkaik +1 ( j=1
ak
such that xk | ut holds. Hence w properly divides ut , contradicting ut ∈ Gmin (I). Hence
either aik = ak − 1 or aik = ak holds for each k ≤ i ≤ m. Note that uk > uk+1 > · · · > um ,
Qk−1 aj −1
it is easy to check uk = xakk j=1
xj , and that aik = ak −1 holds for each k + 1 ≤ i ≤ m.
This completes the verification.
Remark 5.3. Note that (3), as an equivalent description of universal lexsegment ideal,
explores the difference between universal lexsegment ideal, strongly stable ideal and the
monomial ideal of Borel type. Actually, a universal lexsegment monomial ideal is a kind
of super-stable monomial ideal.
If I is a universal lexsegment ideal of S = K[x1 , . . . , xn ] with the minimal generating
set Gmin (I), it is clear that |Gmin (I)| ≤ n. We call a universal lexsegment ideal to be full,
if |Gmin (I)| = n.
In the following, we will consider about the polarization of some class of monomial
ideals with respect to <, and characterize the monomial ideals which become squarefree
strongly stable with respect to ≺ after polarization. Recall that a squarefree monomial
ideal I is called squarefree strongly stable, if for each squarefree monomial u ∈ I and each
pair j < i such that xi | u but xj ∤ u, one has xj (u/xi ) ∈ I (see [2] or [6, page 124]).
Theorem 5.4. Let I be a monomial ideal with Gmin (I) = {u1 , . . . , um }, where ui =
Qn
aij
and u1 > u2 > · · · > um by pure lexicographic order. Let
j=1 xj
aj = max{a1j , . . . , amj }
for j = 1, . . . , n. Then T (I) is squarefree strongly stable, if I is universal lexsegment.
Further more, if aj 6= 1 holds for each j = 1, . . . , n, and for each 1 ≤ j < m, there exists
an integer i such that 0 < aij < aj , then T (I) is squarefree strongly stable if and only if
I is universal lexsegment.
P roof. If I is universal lexsegment, then uk = xakk
T (uk ) = (
j −1
k−1
Y aY
i=1 j=1
Qk−1
xij )(
j=1
ak
Y
j=1
a −1
xj j
xkj ).
for k = 1, . . . , m. Hence
In the case, it is direct to check that T (I) is squarefree strongly stable. This complete
the proof of the first statement.
For the second statement, we only need to prove the necessity part. It is easy to see
that u1 = xa11 . We claim that ai1 = a1 − 1 for every i = 2, . . . , m. In fact, if there exists
some ut such that at1 < a1 − 1, then consider
ati
at1
n Y
Y
Y
T (ut ) = ( x1j )(
xij ) ∈ T (I).
j=1
i=2 j=1
Since T (I) is squarefree strongly stable, it follows that v = x1,at1 +1 (T (ut )/x21 ) ∈ T (I)
holds. Note that for each generating element u of T (I), if xij |u, then xi,j−1 |u, . . . , xi,1 |u
Q t2
hold. Hence v ∈ T (I) implies v1 = x1,at1 +1 (T (ut)/ aj=1
x2j ) ∈ T (I). Note that for any
j, x2j ∤ v1 , thus x2,a2 (v1 /x31 ) ∈ T (I) whenever x31 | v1. Repeat the discussion above, it
Q t3
Q t3
follows that x2,a2 (v1 / aj=1
x3j ) ∈ T (I), and hence v1 / aj=1
x3j ∈ T (I) holds since a2 > 1.
Qat1 +1
By induction, we have j=1 x1j ∈ T (I), contradicting T (u1 ) ∈ Gmin (T (I)). Hence
at1 = a1 − 1 holds for each t = 2, . . . , m. Finally, repeat a discussion used in proving
(4) ⇒ (2) of theorem 5.2, the result follows by induction.
Now assume that aj 6= 1 holds for each j = 1, . . . , n. If there exists some j with aj > 1,
such that either aij = 0 or aij = aj for each i = 1, . . . , m, then the situation will be a
little more complicated than the case in Theorem 5.4. In this case, let WI = {j | aj 6= 0},
and let AI = {j ∈ WI | either aij = aj or aij = 0 for each i = 1, . . . , m}, and let
BI = WI \ AI . Note that if T (I) is squarefree strongly stable, then WI = [r] holds for
some r ≤ n. In this case, we can decompose AI into several mutually disjoint subsets
consisting of successive integers, and denote AI = ∪kt=1 At where
At = {j ∈ Z+ | mt−1 + 1 ≤ j ≤ lt }.
Similarly, let BI = ∪kt=1 Bt , where Bt = {j ∈ Z+ | lt + 1 ≤ j ≤ mt }.
For each j ∈ AI , either aij = 0 or aij = aj holds for any i = 1, . . . , m. Consider the
following two cases: If aij = 0, we claim that it implies ai,j+1 = ai,j+2 = · · · = ain = 0.
In fact, if ait > 0 for some t > j, then T (ui ) ∈ T (I) holds with xt1 | T (ui ). Since T (I) is
squarefree strongly stable, xj,aj (T (ui )/xt1 ) ∈ T (I) holds. Note also that aj > 0 holds, thus
it implies T (ui )/xt1 ∈ T (I), contradicting ui ∈ Gmin (I). On the other hand, if aij = aj
Qaj
holds, then the polarization of ui contains t=1
xjt as its factor, which contains all the
indeterminants related to xj . Note that in each case, essentially there is little change in
the problem we are working with. Due to this reason, the following proposition is routine
to check, and we omit the detailed proof.
Proposition 5.5. If aj 6= 1 for each j = 1, . . . , n, then T (I) is squarefree strongly stable
Q
P
′
if and only if I = ki=1 (Li Mi i−1
j=1 (Lj Mj )), where
Lj = h
lj
Y
t=mj−1 +1
xat t i,
′
Mj = h
mj
Y
t=lj +1
xat t −1 i,
for every j = 1, . . . , k, and Mj is a monomial ideal of S generated by a full universal
lexsegment ideal in the polynomial ring K[xlj +1 , xlj +2 , . . . , xmj ], where
0 = m0 < l1 ≤ m1 < l2 ≤ m2 < · · · < lk ≤ mk ≤ n.
Remark 5.6. In Proposition 5.5, the equality
I=
k
X
i=1
(Li Mi
i−1
Y
′
(Lj Mj ))
j=1
can be interpreted in the following: A universal lexsegment ideal on BI is cut into several
parts by some principal ideals with respect to AI . Note also that the equivalence description would be rather complicated without the assumption aj 6= 1 for each j = 1, . . . , n,
because it will be some universal lexsegment ideals, squarefree strongly stable ideals being
cut into several parts by some principal ideals.
Example 5.7. Let
I = hx31 , x21 x2 x3 , x21 x2 x4 , x21 x2 x35 x36 , x21 x2 x35 x26 x27 , x21 x2 x35 x26 x7 x28 i.
It is easy to see that T (I) is squarefree strongly stable. By computation,
a1 = 3, a2 = 1, a3 = 1, a4 = 1, a5 = 3, a6 = 3, a7 = 2, a8 = 2.
An explanation is that T (I) is going to be divided approximately into several parts: for
x1 , it is universal lexsegment; for x2 , x3 , x4 , it is squarefree strongly stable; for x5 , it is a
principal ideal; for x6 , x7 , x8 , again it is universal lexsegment.
Definition 5.8. Let I be a monomial ideal, and let Gmin (I) = {u1 , . . . , um } with ui =
Qn
aij
for i = 1, . . . , m. The vector (a1 , a2 , . . . , an ) is called the exponent vector of I,
j=1 xj
where ai = max{a1i , . . . , ami }. For a squarefree monomial ideal
J ⊆ K[x11 , . . . , x1τ1 , . . . , . . . , xn1 , . . . , xnτn ],
the vector (b1 , b2 , . . . , bn ) is called the extension vector of J, where
bi = max{j | ∃ u ∈ Gmin (J) such that xij | u}.
By definition, the following Proposition is clear.
Proposition 5.9. For any monomial ideal I, The exponent vector of I is equal to the
extension vector of T (I).
Proposition 5.10. Let J be a polarization of some monomial ideal of S, with the extension vector (b1 , . . . , bn ). If J is squarefree strongly stable and bi 6= 1 for each i = 1, . . . , n,
then the number of monomial I such that T (I) = J is 2t , where t = |WI |.
P roof. By Proposition 5.5, I is uniquely determined by the exponent vector (a1 , . . . , an )
and the set AI . By Proposition 5.9, (a1 , . . . , an ) = (b1 , . . . , bn ) is a constant vector. Hence
I is completely determined by the set AI . Note that AI could be any subset of WI , so
the number of I such that T (I) = J is 2t , where t = |WI |.
References
[1] M.F. Atiyah and I.G. MacDonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, AddisonWesley, Reading, MA, 1969.
[2] A. Aramova, J. Herzog and T. Hibi, Squarefree lexsegment ideals, Math. Z. 228(1998),
353 − 378.
[3] D. Bayer and M.A. Stillman, A criterion for detecting m-regularity. Invent. Math
87(1987), 1 − 11.
[4] Mircea Cimpoeas, Some remarks on Borel type ideals, Commu. Algebra 37 : 2(2009),
724 − 727.
[5] D. Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry. Springer
Science + Business Media, Inc, 2004.
[6] J. Herzog and T. Hibi, Monomial Ideals. Springer-Verlag London Limited, 2011.
[7] J. Herzog, D. Popescu and M. Vladoiu, On the Ext-Modules of ideals of Borel type,
Contemporary Math. 331(2003), 171 − 186.
[8] J. Herzog, T. Hibi and N. V. Trung, Symbolic powers of monomial ideals and vertex
cover algebras, Advances in Mathematics 210(2007), 304C322.
[9] S. Murai and T. Hibi, The depth of an ideal with a given Hilbert function, Proc. of
AMS, 136 : 5(2008), 1533 − 1538.
[10] D. Popescu, Extremal Betti Numbers and regularity of Borel type ideals, Bull. Math.
Soc. Sc. Math. Roumanie, 48(96) : 1(2005), 65 − 72.
[11] I. Swanson and C. Huneke, Integral Closures of Ideals, Rings and Modules. Cambridge
University Press, 2006.
[12] R. H. Villarreal, Monomial Algebra. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, 2001.
[13] O. Zariski and P. Samuel, Commutative Algebra. Vol.1 Reprints of the 1958 − 60
edition. Springer-Verlag New York, 1979.
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1606.01402v2 [math.GR] 12 Jun 2016
FINITE ALMOST SIMPLE GROUPS WHOSE GRUENBERG–KEGEL GRAPHS
COINCIDE WITH GRUENBERG–KEGEL GRAPHS OF SOLVABLE GROUPS
(in Russian, English abstract)
I. B. Gorshkov1, N. V. Maslova1,2
1
Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics UB RAS,
2
Ural Federal University
[email protected], [email protected]
Abstract. Let G be a finite group. Denote by π(G) the set of all prime divisors of the order of G and by ω(G)
the spectrum of G, i.e. the set of all its element orders. The set ω(G) defines the Gruenberg–Kegel graph (or the
prime graph) Γ(G) of G; in this graph the vertex set is π(G) and different vertices p and q are adjacent if and
only if pq ∈ ω(G).
In [J. Group Theory. Vol. 2, no. 2 (1999). P. 157–172] Lucido proved that if G is a finite solvable group then
Γ(G) does not contain a 3-coclique. In [J. Algebra. Vol. 442 (2015). P. 397–422] Gruber et. al. proved that a
graph is isomorphic to the Gruenberg–Kegel graph of a finite solvable group if and only if its complement is
3-colorable and triangle free. In [Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. Vol. 283, suppl. 1 (2013). P. 139–145] Zinov’eva and
Mazurov described finite simple groups whose Gruenberg–Kegel graphs coincide with Gruenberg–Kegel graphs of
Frobenius groups or 2-Frobenius groups. It is not difficult to prove these simple groups are exactly all finite simple
groups whose Gruenberg–Kegel graphs coincide with Gruenberg–Kegel graphs of finite solvable groups. Our aim
is to obtain similar results for finite almost simple groups. In this paper, we prove the following theorem.
Theorem 1. Let G be a finite almost simple group. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(1) Γ(G) does not contain a 3-coclique;
(2) Γ(G) is isomorphic to the Gruenberg–Kegel graph of a finite solvable group;
(3) Γ(G) is equal to the Gruenberg–Kegel graph of an appropriate finite solvable group.
The following question naturally arises: is there a graph Γ without 3-cocliques such that the complement of Γ
is not 3-colorable and Γ is isomorphic to the Gruenberg–Kegel graph of an appropriate finite non-solvable group?
Moreover, we obtain an explicit description of finite almost simple groups whose Gruenberg–Kegel graphs
coincide with Gruenberg–Kegel graphs of finite solvable groups. We prove the following theorem.
Theorem 2. Let G be a finite almost simple group such that S = Soc(G) is isomorphic to one of the following
simple groups: An , where n ≥ 5; P SLn (q), where n ≥ 2 and (n, q) 6= (2, 2), (2, 3); P SUn (q), where n ≥ 3 and
(n, q) 6= (3, 2); P Spn (q), where n ≥ 4 is even; P Ωn (q), where n ≥ 7 is odd; P Ω±
n (q), where n ≥ 8 is even; an
exceptional group of Lie type over the field of order q; a sporadic simple group. Let f be the standard field
automorphism of S and g be the standard graph automorphism of S. Then Γ(G) does not contain a 3-coclique if
and only if π(G) = π(S) and one of the following conditions holds:
3
(1) S is isomorphic to one of the following groups: A9 , A10 , A12 , P SU3 (9), P SU4 (2), P Sp6 (2), P Ω+
8 (2), D4 (2);
(2) G is isomorphic to one of the following groups: S5 , S6 , P GL2 (9), M10 , Aut(A6 ), S8 , Aut(P SL2 (8)),
Aut(P SL3 (2)), P GL3 (4)hf i, P GL3 (4)hgi, Aut(P SL3 (4)), P SL4 (4)hf i, P SL4 (4)hgi, Aut(P SL4 (4)),
Aut(P SU5 (2));
(3) G ∼
= P GL2 (p), where p is either a Fermat prime or a Mersenne prime;
(4) S ∼
= P SL2 (2m ), where m ≥ 4 is even and {2} ⊆ π(G/S);
(5) S ∼
= P SL3 (p), where p is a Mersenne prime and (p − 1)3 6= 3;
(6) S ∼
= P SL3 (p), where p is either a Fermat prime or a Mersenne prime, (p − 1)3 = 3 and Inndiag(S) ≤ G ≤
Aut(S);
(7) S ∼
= P SL3 (2m ), where m ≥ 3, (2m − 1)3 = 3 and Inndiag(S)hgi ≤ G ≤ Aut(P SL3 (2m ));
(8) S ∼
= P SL3 (2m ), where m ≥ 3, (2m − 1)3 6= 3 and Shgi ≤ G ≤ Aut(P SL3 (2m ));
(9) S ∼
= P SL4 (2m ), where m ≥ 3 and Shgi ≤ G ≤ Aut(P SL4 (2m ));
(10) S ∼
= P SU3 (p), where p is a Fermat prime and (p + 1)3 6= 3;
(11) S ∼
= P SU3 (p), where p is a Fermat prime, (p + 1)3 = 3 and Inndiag(S) ≤ G ≤ Aut(S);
(12) S ∼
= P SU3 (2m ), where m ≥ 2, (2m − 1)3 = 3, {2} ⊆ π(G/S) and Inndiag(S) ≤ G ≤ Aut(S);
(13) S ∼
= P SU3 (2m ), where m ≥ 2, (2m − 1)3 6= 3 and {2} ⊆ π(G/S);
(14) S ∼
= P SU4 (2m ), where m ≥ 2 and {2} ⊆ π(G/S);
∼
(15) S = P Sp4 (q).
Keywords: finite group, solvable group, almost simple group, Gruenberg–Kegel graph (prime graph).
The work is supported by the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists (grant
no. MK-6118.2016.1), by the Integrated Program for Fundamental Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian
Academy of Sciences (project no. 15-16-1-5), by the Program for State Support of Leading Universities of the
Russian Federation (agreement no. 02.A03.21.0006 of August 27, 2013). The first author is supported by the grant
FAPESP-2014/08964-1. The second author is a winner of the competition of young mathematicians of the Dmitry
Zimin Foundation “Dynasty” (in 2013 year).
1
Введение
Мы будем употреблять термин «группа» в значении «конечная группа» и термин «граф» в значении
«конечный граф без петель и кратных ребер».
Спектром группы G называется множество ω(G) порядков всех ее элементов. Множество всех
простых чисел, входящих в спектр группы G, называется простым спектром группы G и обозначается через π(G). Спектр ω(G) определяет граф Грюнберга–Кегеля (или граф простых чисел) Γ(G)
группы G, вершинами которого являются простые числа из π(G), и две различные вершины r и s
смежны тогда и только тогда, когда число rs принадлежит множеству ω(G). Обозначим через t(G)
наибольшее число простых чисел в π(G), попарно не смежных в Γ(G).
Напомним, что под равенством графов Грюнберга–Кегеля групп мы понимаем совпадение их
множеств вершин (то есть простых спектров групп) и множеств ребер. Под изоморфизмом графов
Грюнберга–Кегеля групп мы понимаем их изоморфизм как абстрактных графов.
В [1, теорема 1]* было замечено, что графы Грюнберга–Кегеля разрешимых групп не содержат
3-коклик, иными словами t(H) ≤ 2 для любой разрешимой группы H. В [2] было показано, что
граф изоморфен графу Грюнберга–Кегеля разрешимой группы тогда и только тогда, когда он не
содержит 3-коклик и его дополнение 3-раскрашиваемо. В [3, теоремы 1, 3] описаны простые группы,
графы Грюнберга–Кегеля которых равны графам Грюнберга–Кегеля разрешимых групп Фробениуса и двойных групп Фробениуса. Из [4, таблицы 2,3] и [5, таблицы 2, 3, 4] следует, что группами
из [3, теоремы 1, 3] исчерпываются все простые группы, графы Грюнберга–Кегеля которых равны графам Грюнберга–Кегеля разрешимых групп. Цель настоящей работы — получить подобное
описание для почти простых групп. Нами доказана следующая
ТЕОРЕМА 1. Пусть G — почти простая группа. Тогда следующие условия эквивалентны:
(1) Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик;
(2) Γ(G) изоморфен графу Грюнберга–Кегеля некоторой разрешимой группы;
(3) Γ(G) равен графу Грюнберга–Кегеля некоторой разрешимой группы.
Естественным образом возникает следующий
ВОПРОС. Существует ли граф без 3-коклик, который изоморфен графу Грюнберга–Кегеля
некоторой неразрешимой группы, и не изоморфен графу Грюнберга–Кегеля никакой разрешимой
группы?
Напомним, что через Soc(G) обозначается цоколь группы G (подгруппа, порожденная всеми
ее минимальными неединичными нормальными подгруппами). Пусть q = pm и G — почти простая группа такая, что подгруппа S = Soc(G) изоморфна одной из простых групп: An , где n ≥ 5;
P SLn (q), где n ≥ 2 и (n, q) 6= (2, 2), (2, 3); P SUn (q), где n ≥ 3 и (n, q) 6= (3, 2); P Spn (q), где n ≥ 4 четно; P Ωn (q), где n ≥ 7 нечетно; P Ω±
n (q), где n ≥ 8 четно; простой исключительной группе лиева типа
над полем порядка q или одной из конечных простых спорадических групп. Необходимые сведения
о строении групп автоморфизмов конечных простых линейных и унитарных групп приведены далее
в леммах 5 и 6. Ключевым для доказательства теоремы 1 является следующий полученный нами
результат, имеющий независимый интерес.
ТЕОРЕМА 2. Пусть G — почти простая группа и S = Soc(G). Тогда Γ(G) не содержит 3коклик тогда и только тогда, когда выполняется одно из следующих утверждений:
(1) группа S изоморфна одной из следующих групп: A9 , A10 , A12 , P SU3 (9), P SU4 (2), P Sp6 (2),
3
P Ω+
8 (2), D4 (2);
(2) группа G изоморфна одной из следующих групп: S5 , S6 , P GL2 (9), M10 , Aut(A6 ), S8 ,
Aut(P SL2 (8)), Aut(P SL3 (2)), P GL3 (4)hf i, P GL3 (4)hgi, Aut(P SL3 (4)), P SL4 (4)hf i, P SL4 (4)hgi,
Aut(P SL4 (4)), Aut(P SU5 (2));
(3) G ∼
= P GL2 (p), p — простое число Ферма или Мерсена;
(4) S ∼
= P SL2 (2m ), m ≥ 4 четно и {2} ⊆ π(G/S) ⊆ π(S);
(5) S ∼
= P SL3 (p), p — простое число Мерсена и (p − 1)3 6= 3;
(6) S ∼
= P SL3 (p), p — простое число Мерсена, (p − 1)3 = 3 и Inndiag(S) ≤ G ≤ Aut(S);
(7) S ∼
= P SL3 (2m ), m ≥ 3, (2m − 1)3 = 3, π(G) = π(S) и Inndiag(S)hgi ≤ G ≤ Aut(S);
∼
(8) S = P SL3 (2m ), m ≥ 3, (2m − 1)3 6= 3, π(G) = π(S) и Shgi ≤ G ≤ Aut(S);
*Настоящий результат был получен М.С. Лучидо в 1999 г., однако он напрямую следует из более ранних результатов Г. Хигмана [6, теорема 1] и Ф. Холла [7, теорема 6.4.1].
2
(9) S ∼
= P SL4 (2m ), m ≥ 3, π(G) = π(S) и Shgi ≤ G ≤ Aut(S);
(10) S ∼
= P SU3 (p), p — простое число Ферма и (p + 1)3 6= 3;
(11) S ∼
= P SU3 (p), p — простое число Ферма, (p + 1)3 = 3 и Inndiag(S) ≤ G ≤ Aut(S);
(12) S ∼
= P SU3 (2m ), m ≥ 2, (2m − 1)3 = 3, {2} ⊆ π(G/S) ⊆ π(S) и Inndiag(S) ≤ G ≤ Aut(S);
(13) S ∼
= P SU3 (2m ), m ≥ 2, (2m − 1)3 6= 3 и {2} ⊆ π(G/S) ⊆ π(S);
∼
(14) S = P SU4 (2m ), m ≥ 2 и {2} ⊆ π(G/S) ⊆ π(S);
(15) S ∼
= P Sp4 (q) и π(G) = π(S).
ЗАМЕЧАНИЕ. Если G — почти простая группа такая, что Γ(G) не сдержит 3-коклик, то
π(G) = π(Soc(G)).
Вспомогательные результаты
Наши обозначения и терминология в основном стандартны, их можно найти в [7, 8, 9, 10].
Если q — натуральное число, r — нечётное простое число и (q, r) = 1, то e(r, q) обозначает
мультипликативный порядок числа q по модулю r, равный минимальному натуральному числу m,
удовлетворяющему условию q m ≡ 1 (mod r). Для нечётного q положим e(2, q) = 1, если q ≡ 1
(mod 4), и e(2, q) = 2 в противном случае.
ЛЕММА 1. (следствие теоремы Жигмонди, [11]) Пусть q — натуральное число, большее 1. Для
любого натурального числа m существует простое число r, удовлетворяющее равенству e(r, q) =
m, за исключением следующих случаев: q = 2 и m = 1; q = 3 и m = 1; q = 2 и m = 6.
Простое число r, удовлетворяющее условию e(r, q) = m, называется примитивным простым
делителем числа q m − 1. По лемме 1 такое число существует, за исключением случаев, упомянутых
в лемме. Для данного q обозначим через Rm (q) множество всех примитивных простых делителей
числа q m − 1. Легко понять, что Ri (q) ∩ Rj (q) = ∅ при любых различных i и j, и если q — степень
простого числа, то Ri (q) ∩ π(q) = ∅ для любого i.
ЛЕММА 2 (лемма Героно [12]). Пусть p, q — простые числа такие, что pa − q b = 1 для некоторых натуральных чисел a, b. Тогда пара (pa , q b ) равна (32 , 23 ), (p, 2b ) или (2a , q).
ЛЕММА 3. Пусть π — конечное множество простых чисел и Γ — граф, вершинами которого
являются простые числа из π. Если π = π1 ∪ π2 , причем π1 и π2 — непересекающиеся клики в Γ,
то существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ = Γ(H).
Доказательство. Пусть π1 = {p1 , . . . , pm }, π2 = {q1 , . . . , qn } и C = Cq1 × . . . × Cqn — циклическая
группа. Пусть, без ограничения общности, число p1 не смежно в Γ с числами из множества {q1 , . . . qk }
и смежно с числами из множества {qk+1 , . . . , qn }. Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма существует нату1
ральное число m1 такое, что pm
1 − 1 делится на произведение q1 · . . . · qk . Тогда мультипликативная
m1
∗
группа F1 поля F1 порядка p1 содержит элемент x1 порядка q1 ·. . .·qk . Определим действие группы
C на аддитивной группе F1+ поля F1 , полагая, что действие порождающего элемента подгруппы
Cq1 × . . . × Cqk на F1+ — это умножение в поле F1 на элемент x1 , а действие порождающего элемента
подгруппы Cqk+1 × . . .× Cqn на F1+ тривиально. Аналогичным образом определим поле Fi и действие
группы C на аддитивной группе Fi+ поля Fi для каждого pi ∈ π1 . Пусть группа H — естественное
+
полупрямое произведение группы F = F1+ × . . . Fm
на группу C. Тогда группа H разрешима и граф
Грюнберга–Кегеля Γ(H) в точности равен графу Γ. Лемма доказана.
Также нам понадобится следующая легко доказываемая
ЛЕММА 4. (см., например, [13, лемма 2]) Пусть L — группа, K ✁ L, r, s ∈ π(K) \ π(|L : K|). Тогда
если простые числа r и s не смежны в Γ(K), то они не смежны в Γ(L).
ЛЕММА 5. [10, теорема 4.5.1, предложения 2.5.12, 4.9.1, 4.9.2] Пусть S = P SLn (q), где n ≥ 2, q =
′
pm и (n, q) 6= (2, 2), (2, 3), x — элемент простого порядка r в Aut(S) \ Inndiag(S) и Sx = Op (CS (x)).
Тогда справедливы следующие утверждения:
(1) Aut(S) = Inndiag(S) ⋋ (Φ × hgi), где Outdiag(S) ∼
= Z(n, q−1) , Φ = hf i ∼
= Aut(GF (q)) ∼
= Zm
— группа полевых автоморфизмов группы S, g = 1 для n = 2 и g — графовый автоморфизм
порядка 2 группы S для n ≥ 3, Φ действует на Outdiag(S) так же, как Aut(GF (q)) действует на
мультипликативную подгруппу из GF (q) того же порядка, что и Outdiag(S), и g инвертирует
группу Outdiag(S);
3
1
(2) Если x ∈ Inndiag(S)Φ, то r делит m, Sx ∼
= P SLn (q r ) и CInndiag(S) (x) ∼
= Inndiag(Sx );
m
1
2
(3) Если n ≥ 3, 2 делит m и x ∈ Inndiag(S)f 2 g, то r = 2, Sx ∼
P
SU
(q
), и CInndiag(S) (x) ∼
=
=
n
Inndiag(Sx );
(4) Если x ∈ Inndiag(S)g и n нечетно, то Sx ∼
= P Spn−1 (q);
(5) Если x ∈ Inndiag(S)g, n ≥ 4 четно и p = 2, то подгруппа CS (x) изоморфна либо P Spn (q),
либо централизатору некоторой инволюции в P Spn (q);
(6) Если x ∈ Inndiag(S)g, n ≥ 4 четно и p > 2, то подгруппа Sx изоморфна одной из следующих
−
групп: P Spn (q), P Ω+
n (q), P Ωn (q).
ЛЕММА 6. [10, теорема 4.5.1, предложения 2.5.12, 4.9.1, 4.9.2] Пусть S = P SUn (q), где n ≥ 3,
′
q = pm и (n, q) 6= (3, 2), x — элемент простого порядка r в Aut(S) \ Inndiag(S) и Sx = Op (CS (x)).
Тогда справедливы следующие утверждения:
(1) Aut(S) = Inndiag(S) ⋋ Φ, где Outdiag(S) ∼
= Z(n,q+1) , Φ = hf i ∼
= Aut(GF (q 2 )) ∼
= Z2m —
группа полевых автоморфизмов группы S, Φ действует на Outdiag(S) так же, как Aut(GF (q 2 ))
действует на мультипликативную подгруппу из GF (q 2 ) того же порядка, что и Outdiag(S);
1
(2) Если r > 2, то Sx ∼
= Inndiag(Sx );
= P SUn (q p ) и CInndiag(S) (x) ∼
(3) Если r = 2 и n нечетно, то Sx ∼
= P Spn−1 (q);
(4) Если r = p = 2 и n четно, то подгруппа CS (x) изоморфна либо P Spn (q), либо централизатору некоторой инволюции в P Spn (q);
(5) Если r = 2, n четно и p > 2, то подгруппа Sx изоморфна одной из следующих групп:
−
P Spn (q), P Ω+
n (q), P Ωn (q).
Конечные почти простые группы, графы Грюнберга–Кегеля
которых не содержат 3-коклик
В настоящем разделе для каждой почти простой группы G мы покажем, что либо Γ(G) содержит
3-коклику, либо существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H). Таким образом, мы
докажем теорему 2 и импликацию (1) ⇒ (3) в теореме 1. Импликация (3) ⇒ (2) в теореме 1 очевидна,
а импликация (2) ⇒ (1) следует из [1, теорема 1].
Зафиксируем обозначение, которое будет действовать до конца настоящей работы. Пусть G —
почти простая группа и S = Soc(G).
ЛЕММА 7. Пусть S — спорадическая группа. Тогда
(1) Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, если, и только если S ∼
= J2 ;
(2) если S ∼
= J2 , то существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Доказательство. Ввиду [9] имеем |G : S| ≤ 2. Если S ∼
6 J2 , то ввиду [5, табл. 1] граф Γ(S) содержит
=
3-коклику, состоящую из нечетных чисел. Применение леммы 4 завершает доказательство пункта
(1).
Если S ∼
= J2 , то ввиду [9] имеем π(S) = π(Aut(S)) = {2, 3, 5} ∪ {7}, и множества {2, 3, 5} и {7}
являются кликами в Γ(S). Таким образом, ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая,
что Γ(G) = Γ(H). Лемма доказана.
∼ An , где n ≥ 5. Тогда
ЛЕММА 8. Пусть S =
(1) Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, если, и только если либо A6 < G ≤ Aut(A6 ), либо G ∈ {S5 , S8 },
либо S ∈ {A9 , A10 , A12 };
(2) если Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, то существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) =
Γ(H).
Доказательство. Ввиду [9] если группа G изоморфна одной из групп: A5 , A6 , A7 , S7 , A8 , A11 ,
S11 , то Γ(G) содержит 3-колику; если группа G изоморфная одной из групп: S5 , S6 , M10 , P GL2 (9),
Aut(A6 ), S8 , A9 , S9 , A10 , S10 , A12 , S12 , то Γ(G) не содержат 3-коклик, и легко проверить, что ввиду
леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Если 13 ≤ n ≤ 17, то множество {7, 11, 13} образует 3-коклику в Γ(S) ввиду [4, предложение 1.1].
Если n ≥ 18, то по [14, лемма 1] в интервале ((n + 1)/2, n) лежат по крайней мере три различных
нечетных простых числа, которые также образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S) ввиду [4, предложение 1.1].
Применение леммы 4 завершает доказательство леммы.
4
ЛЕММА 9. Пусть S ∼
= P SLn (q), где n ≥ 2, q = pm ≥ 4 и (n, q) 6= (2, 2), (2, 3). Тогда
(1) Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, если, и только если выполняется одно из следующих утверждений:
(i) группа G изоморфна одной из следующих групп: S5 , S6 , P GL2 (9), M10 , Aut(A6 ), S8 ,
Aut(P SL2 (8)), Aut(P SL3 (2)), P GL3 (4)hf i, P GL3 (4)hgi, Aut(P SL3 (4)), P SL4 (4)hf i, P SL4 (4)hgi,
Aut(P SL4 (4));
(ii) G — группа из пунктов (3) − (9) теоремы 2;
(2) для каждой группы G из пункта (1) леммы граф Γ(G) равен графу Грюнберга–Кегеля подходящей разрешимой группы.
Доказательство. Пусть n = 2. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = (q − 1, 2)m и π(S) =
{p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R2 (q).
Пусть q нечетно и не является числом вида 2w ± 1. Пусть r1 ∈ Rm (p) и r2 ∈ R2m (p) нечетны.
Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r1 и r2 не делят |Out(S)|. Если p не делит индекс |G : S|, то
ввиду леммы 4 числа {p, r1 , r2 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G). Пусть p делит индекс |G : S|, тогда p
делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка p, y — любой элемент порядка r1 и z — любой элемент
порядка r2 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S). Заметим, что в Inndiag(S) нет элементов порядков
pr1 и pr2 . Если x ∈ G \ Inndiag(S), то ввиду леммы 5 имеем CInndiag(S) (x) ∼
= P GL2 (pm/p ), и числа
r1 и r2 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким образом, числа {p, r1 , r2 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду
леммы 4.
Пусть q нечетно и q = 2w + ε1, где ε ∈ {+, −}. Тогда ввиду леммы 2 либо q = 9 и случай
S = P SL2 (9) ∼
= A6 рассмотрен в лемме 8, либо q = p, Aut(S) ∼
= P GL2 (p) и π(S) = π(Aut(S)).
Заметим, что t(S) = 3 ввиду [5, табл. 2]. Если G — группа из пункта (3) теоремы 2, то ввиду [4,
предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1] и [16, следствие 2] множества {p} и R1 (p) ∪ R2 (p) являются кликами в
Γ(G). Таким образом, ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть q = 2m . Cлучай S = P SL2 (4) ∼
= A5 рассмотрен в лемме 8. Ввиду [9] граф Γ(P SL2 (8))
содержит 3-коклику, а граф Γ(Aut(P SL2 (8))) не содержит 3-колик. Кроме того, ввиду [9] имеем
π(Aut(P SL2 (8))) = {2, 3} ∪ {7}, и числа 2 и 3 смежны в Γ(Aut(P SL2 (8))). Таким образом, ввиду
леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(Aut(P SL2 (8))) = Γ(H).
Пусть q > 8, положим r1 = 7 и r2 = 13, если q = 64, и r1 ∈ Rm (2) и r2 ∈ R2m (2) в противном
случае. Заметим, что числа r1 и r2 не делят m ввиду малой теоремы Ферма. Если индекс |G : S|
нечетен, то ввиду [5, табл. 2] и леммы 4 числа {2, r1 , r2 } образуют коклику в Γ(G). Пусть r ∈ π(|G :
S|) \ π(S). Тогда r 6∈ {2, 3} и r делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка r, y — любой элемент
порядка r1 и z — любой элемент порядка r2 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S) и x ∈ G\Inndiag(S).
Ввиду леммы 5 имеем CInndiag(S) (x) ∼
= P SL2 (pm/r ) и числа r1 и r2 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким
образом, числа {r, r1 , r2 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G). Пусть {2} ⊆ π(|G : S|) ⊂ π(S). Ввиду [4,
предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1] и леммы 5 множества {2} ∪R1 (q) и R2 (q) являются кликами в Γ(G). Таким
образом, если G — группа из пункта (4) теоремы 2, то ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа
H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть n = 3. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(q − 1, 3)m и π(S) = {p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪
R2 (q) ∪ R3 (q).
Пусть p нечетно и q + 1 не является числом вида 2w . Ввиду [5, табл. 2] в графе Γ(S) есть
коклика {p, r2 , r3 }, где 2 6= r2 ∈ R2m (p) и r3 ∈ R3m (p). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r2 и r3
не делят |Out(S)|. Если p не делит индекс |G : S|, то числа {p, r2 , r3 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G)
ввиду леммы 4. Пусть p делит индекс |G : S|. Тогда p делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка
p, y — любой элемент порядка r2 и z — любой элемент порядка r3 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в
Inndiag(S). Заметим, что в Inndiag(S) нет элементов порядков pr2 и pr3 . Если x ∈ G \ Inndiag(S),
то ввиду леммы 5 имеем CInndiag(S) (x) = P GL3 (pm/p ), и числа r2 и r3 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|.
Таким образом, числа {p, r2 , r3 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Предположим, что q = 2w − 1. Тогда ввиду леммы 2 имеем q = p, Aut(S) ∼
= P GL3 (q)hgi и π(S) =
π(Aut(S)). Если (q − 1)3 6= 3, то ввиду [4, предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1] множества {p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R2 (q)
и R3 (q) являются кликами в Γ(G). Таким образом, если G — группа из пункта (5) теоремы 2, то
ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H). Пусть (q − 1)3 = 3. Тогда
ввиду [5, табл. 2] множество {3, p, r3 }, где r3 ∈ R3 (p), является 3-кокликой в Γ(S). Если Γ(G) не
содержит 3-коклик, то ввиду леммы 4 имеем Inndiag(S) ≤ G. Обратно, если Inndiag(S) ≤ G, ввиду
[4, предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1] и [16, следствие 2] множества {p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R2 (q) и R3 (q) являются
5
кликами в Γ(G). Таким образом, если G — группа из пункта (6) теоремы 2, то ввиду леммы 3
существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть p = 2. Заметим, что P SL3 (2) ∼
= P SL2 (7), и если q = 4, то ввиду [4, предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1] и леммы 5 граф Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик тогда и только тогда, когда G ∈
{P GL3 (4)hf i, P GL3 (4)hgi, Aut(P SL3 (4))}. Кроме того, |π(Aut(P SL3 (4)))| = 4, следовательно, если Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, то ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что
Γ(G) = Γ(H). Поэтому можно считать, что m > 2.
Если r ∈ π(|G : S|) \ π(S), то r 6∈ {2, 3} и r делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка r, y
— любой элемент порядка r2 ∈ R2m (2) и z — любой элемент порядка r3 ∈ R3m (2) из G. Тогда y и
z лежат в Inndiag(S) и x ∈ G \ Inndiag(S). Ввиду леммы 5 имеем CInndiag(S) (x) = P GL3 (2m/r ) и
числа r2 и r3 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким образом, числа {r, r2 , r3 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Пусть π(G) = π(S) и Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик.
Если (q − 1)3 = 3, то m ≡ 2, 4 (mod 6) и из [5, табл. 2] следует, что в графе Γ(S) есть 3-коклика
{3, r2 , r3 }, где r2 ∈ R2m (2) и r3 ∈ R3m (2). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r2 и r3 не делят
|Out(S)|. Поскольку 3 не делит m, то ввиду леммы 4 имеем Inndiag(S) ≤ G.
Пусть m нечетно. Тогда (q − 1)3 = 1 и S = Inndiag(S). Ввиду [5, табл. 2] в графе Γ(S) есть
3-коклика {2, r2 , r3 }, где r3 ∈ R3m (2), r2 ∈ R2m (2), если m 6= 3, и r2 = 3, если m = 3. Ввиду леммы
4 имеем Inndiag(S)hgi ≤ G .
Пусть m четно и q 6= 16. Рассмотрим 3-коклику {2, r2 , r3 } в Γ(S), где r2 ∈ R2m (2) и r3 ∈ R3m (2).
Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, поэтому числа 2 и r2 смежны в Γ(G) или числа 2 и r3 смежны в
Γ(G). В первом случае в G \ Inndiag(S) найдется инволюция t, порядок централизатора которой в Inndiag(S) делится на r2 . Ввиду леммы 5 имеем t ∈ Inndiag(S)hgi \ Inndiag(S), откуда
Shti ≤ G. Предположим, что числа 2 и r2 не смежны в Γ(G), тогда в G \ Inndiag(S) найдется
инволюция t1 , порядок централизатора которой в Inndiag(S) делится на r3 . Ввиду леммы 5 имеем
m
(2). Поскольку числа 2
t1 ∈ Inndiag(S)f 2 g. Рассмотрим 3-коклику {2, r2 , r3′ } в Γ(S), где r3′ ∈ R 3m
2
и r2 не смежны в Γ(G), тогда в G \ Inndiag(S) найдется инволюция t2 , порядок централизатора
m
которой в Inndiag(S) делится на r3′ . Ввиду леммы 5 имеем t2 ∈ Inndiag(S)hf 2 i\Inndiag(S), откуда
t1 t2 ∈ Inndiag(S)hgi \ Inndiag(S) и Sht1 t2 i ≤ G. Кроме того, ввиду [10, предложение 4.9.2] любой
элемент порядка 2 из Inndiag(S)hgi \ Inndiag(S) сопряжен с g посредством элемента из S, откуда
Shgi ≤ G. Для группы S = P SL3 (16) аналогичный результат можно получить, положив r2 = 17,
r3 = 13 и r3′ = 7.
Пусть G — группа из пункта (7) или (8) теоремы 2. Из [4, предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1], [16, следствие 2] и [10, предложение 4.9.2] следует, что множества {2} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R2 (q) и R3 (q) являются
кликами в Γ(G). Таким образом, ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что
Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть n = 4. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(q − 1, 4)m и π(S) = {p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪
R2 (q) ∪ R3 (q) ∪ R4 (q).
Пусть p нечетно. Ввиду [5, табл. 2] в графе Γ(S) есть коклика {p, r3 , r4 }, где r3 ∈ R3m (p) и
r4 ∈ R4m (p). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r3 и r4 не делят |Out(S)|. Если p не делит индекс
|G : S|, то числа {p, r3 , r4 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду леммы 4. Пусть p делит индекс |G : S|.
Тогда p делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка p, y — любой элемент порядка r3 и z — любой
элемент порядка r4 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S). Заметим, что в Inndiag(S) нет элементов
порядков pr3 и pr4 . Если x ∈ G\Inndiag(S), то ввиду леммы 5 имеем CInndiag(S) (x) = P GL4 (pm/p ) и
числа r3 и r4 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким образом, числа {p, r3 , r4 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Пусть p = 2. Тогда S = Inndiag(S). Если q = 2, то, поскольку P SL4 (2) ∼
= A8 , этот случай
рассмотрен в лемме 8. Если q = 4, то ввиду [4, предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1] и леммы 5 граф Γ(G) не
содержит 3-коклик тогда и только тогда, когда G ∈ {P SL4(4)hf i, P GL4 (4)hgi, Aut(P SL4 (4))}. Кроме
того, |π(Aut(P SL4 (4)))| = 5 и Γ(P SL4 (4)) содержит треугольник, следовательно, Γ(G) не является
5-циклом, откуда если Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, то ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа
H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H). Поэтому можно считать, что m > 2.
Пусть Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик. Из [5, табл. 2] следует, что в графе Γ(S) есть 3-коклика
{2, r3 , r4 }, где r3 ∈ R3m (2) и rm ∈ R4m (2). Пусть r ∈ π(|G : S|) \ π(S). Тогда r 6∈ {2, 3} и r делит
m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка r, y — любой элемент порядка r3 и z — любой элемент
порядка r4 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S) и x ∈ G \ Inndiag(S). Ввиду леммы 5 имеем
CInndiag(S) (x) = P GL4 (2m/r ) и числа r3 и r4 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким образом, числа {r, r3 , r4 }
образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G), противоречие. Пусть π(G) = π(S). Если m нечетно, то Inndiag(S)hgi ≤
G ввиду леммы 4. Пусть m четно и q 6= 16. Так как Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, то числа 2 и
6
r4 смежны в Γ(G) или числа 2 и r3 смежны в Γ(G). В первом случае в G \ Inndiag(S) найдется
инволюция t, порядок централизатора которой в Inndiag(S) делится на r4 . Ввиду леммы 5 имеем
t ∈ Inndiag(S)hgi \ Inndiag(S), откуда Shti ≤ G. Предположим, что числа 2 и r4 не смежны в
Γ(G), тогда в G \ Inndiag(S) найдется инволюция t1 , порядок централизатора которой в Inndiag(S)
m
делится на r3 . Ввиду леммы 5 имеем t1 ∈ Inndiag(S)f 2 g. Из [5, табл. 2] следует, что в графе Γ(S)
есть 3-коклика {2, r3′ , r4 }, где r3′ ∈ R 3m
(2). Поскольку числа 2 и r4 не смежны в Γ(G), в G\Inndiag(S)
2
найдется инволюция t2 , порядок централизатора которой в Inndiag(S) делится на r3′ . Ввиду леммы
m
5 имеем t2 ∈ Inndiag(S)hf 2 i \ Inndiag(S), откуда t1 t2 ∈ Inndiag(S)hgi \ Inndiag(S) и Sht1 t2 i ≤ G,
поэтому Inndiag(S)hgi ≤ G. Для группы S = P SL4 (16) аналогичный результат можно получить,
положив r4 = 257, r3 = 13 и r3′ = 7.
Пусть G — группа из пункта (9) теоремы 2. Из [4, предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1] и [10, предложение
4.9.2] следует, что множества {2} ∪ R2 (q) ∪ R4 (q) и R1 (q) ∪ R3 (q) являются кликами в Γ(G). Таким
образом, ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть n ≥ 5. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(q − 1, n)m. Рассмотрим множество
{a, b, c}, где a ∈ Rmn (p) ⊆ Rn (q), b ∈ Rm(n−1) (p) ⊆ Rn−1 (q) и c ∈ Rm(n−2) (p) ⊆ Rn−2 (q), если
(m, n, p) 6= (2, 5, 2), (1, 6, 2), (1, 7, 2), (1, 8, 2); {a, b, c} = {7, 17, 31}, если (m, n, p) = (2, 5, 2); {a, b, c} =
{5, 7, 31}, если (m, n, p) = (1, 6, 2); {a, b, c} = {5, 31, 127}, если (m, n, p) = (1, 7, 2), (1, 8, 2). Ввиду
малой теоремы Ферма числа a, b и c не делят |Out(S)|. Из [5, табл. 2] следует, что числа {a, b, c}
образуют коклику в Γ(S), поэтому они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду леммы 4. Лемма доказана.
ЛЕММА 10. Пусть S ∼
= P SUn (q), где n ≥ 3, q = pm ≥ 2 и (n, q) 6= (3, 2). Тогда
(1) Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, если, и только если выполняется одно из следующих утверждений:
(i) S изоморфна одной из групп P SU3 (9) или P SU4 (2);
(ii) G ∼
= Aut(P SU5 (2));
(iii) G — группа из пунктов (10) − (14) теоремы 2;
(2) для каждой группы G из пункта (1) леммы граф Γ(G) равен графу Грюнберга–Кегеля подходящей разрешимой группы.
Доказательство. Пусть n = 3. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2m(q + 1, 3) и π(S) =
{p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R2 (q) ∪ R6 (q).
Пусть p нечетно и q − 1 не является числом вида 2w . Ввиду [5, табл. 2] в графе Γ(S) есть коклика
{p, 3, r1 , r6 }, где 2 6= r1 ∈ Rm (p) и r6 ∈ R6m (p). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r1 и r6 не делят
|Out(S)|. Если p не делит индекс |G : S|, то числа {p, r1 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду леммы
4. Пусть p делит индекс |G : S|. Тогда p делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка p, y — любой
элемент порядка r1 и z — любой элемент порядка r6 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S). Заметим,
что в Inndiag(S) нет элементов порядков pr1 и pr6 . Если x ∈ G \ Inndiag(S), то ввиду леммы 5
имеем CInndiag(S) (x) = P GU3 (pm/p ), и числа r1 и r6 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким образом, числа
{p, r1 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Предположим, что q = 2w + 1. Тогда ввиду леммы 2 имеем либо q = 9, либо q = p. В обоих
случаях π(S) = π(Aut(S)). Если (q + 1)3 6= 3, то ввиду [4, предложения 2.2, 3.1, 4.2] множества
{p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R2 (q) и R6 (q) являются кликами в Γ(G). Таким образом, если S ∼
= P SU3 (9) или G —
группа из пункта (10) теоремы 2, то ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что
Γ(G) = Γ(H). Пусть (q+1)3 = 3. Тогда ввиду [5, табл. 2] множество {3, p, r6 }, где r6 ∈ R6 (p), является
кокликой в Γ(S). Если Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, то ввиду леммы 4 имеем 3 делит |G/S|, откуда
следует, что Inndiag(S) ≤ G. Обратно, если Inndiag(S) ≤ G, ввиду [4, предложения 2.1, 3.1, 4.1] и
[16, следствие 2] множества {p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R2 (q) и R6 (q) являются кликами в Γ(G). Таким образом,
если G — группа из пункта (11) теоремы 2, то ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H
такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть p = 2. Если (q + 1)3 = 3, то m ≡ ±1 (mod 6). Из [5, табл. 2] следует, что в графе Γ(S) есть
3-коклика {3, r1 , r6 }, где r1 ∈ Rm (2) и r6 ∈ R6m (2). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r1 и r6 не
делят |Out(S)|. Поскольку 3 не делит m, то если Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, ввиду леммы 4 имеем
Inndiag(S) ≤ G.
Пусть Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик. Положим r6 ∈ R6m (2) и r1 ∈ Rm (2). Ввиду малой теоремы
Ферма числа r6 и r1 не делят |Out(S)|. Предположим, что r ∈ π(|G : S|) \ π(S), тогда r 6∈ {2, 3}
и r делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка r, y — любой элемент порядка r1 и z — любой
элемент порядка r6 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S) и x ∈ G \ Inndiag(S). Ввиду леммы 5
имеем CInndiag(S) (x) = P GU3 (2m/r ) и числа r1 и r6 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким образом, числа
7
{r, r1 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G), противоречие. Пусть π(G) = π(S) и индекс |G : S| нечетен.
Тогда числа {2, r1 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду [5, табл. 2] и леммы 4. Пусть G — группа
из пункта (12) или (13) теоремы 2. Ввиду [4, предложения 2.2, 3.1, 4.2] и [16, следствие 2] множества
{2} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R2 (q) и R6 (q) являются кликами в Γ(G). Таким образом, ввиду леммы 3 существует
разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть n = 4. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(q + 1, 4)m и π(S) = {p} ∪ R1 (q) ∪
R2 (q) ∪ R4 (q) ∪ R6 (q).
Пусть p нечетно. Ввиду [5, табл. 2] в графе Γ(S) есть коклика {p, r4 , r6 }, где r4 ∈ R4m (p) и
r6 ∈ R6m (p). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r4 и r6 не делят |Out(S)|. Если p не делит индекс
|G : S|, то числа {p, r4 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду леммы 4. Пусть p делит индекс |G : S|,
тогда p делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка p, y — любой элемент порядка r4 и z — любой
элемент порядка r6 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S). Заметим, что в Inndiag(S) нет элементов
порядков pr4 и pr6 . Если x ∈ G\Inndiag(S), то ввиду леммы 5 имеем CInndiag(S) (x) = P GU4 (pm/p ) и
числа r4 и r6 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким образом, числа {p, r4 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Пусть p = 2. Тогда S = Inndiag(S). Ввиду [9] имеем π(P SU4 (2)) = π(Aut(P SU4 (2))) и
π(P SU4 (2)) = {2, 3} ∪ {5}, причем числа 2 и 3 смежны в Γ(P SU4 (2)). Таким образом, ввиду леммы 3 если S = P SU4 (2), то существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(S) = Γ(H). Поэтому
можем считать, что q ≥ 4. Из [5, табл. 2] следует, что в графе Γ(S) есть 3-коклика {2, r4 , r6 }, где
r4 ∈ R4m (2) и r6 ∈ R6m (2). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r4 и r6 не делят |Out(S)|. Пусть
r ∈ π(|G : S|) \ π(S). Тогда r 6∈ {2, 3} и r делит m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка r, y — любой элемент порядка r4 и z — любой элемент порядка r6 из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S) и
x ∈ G \ Inndiag(S). Ввиду леммы 6 имеем CInndiag(S) (x) = P GU4 (2m/r ) и числа r4 и r6 не делят
|CInndiag(S) (x)|. Таким образом, числа {r, r4 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G). Пусть π(G) = π(S)
и индекс |G : S| нечетен. Тогда числа {2, r4 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду [5, табл. 2] и
леммы 4. Пусть π(G) = π(S) и индекс |G : S| четен, тогда m четно и G содержит инволюцию
m
t ∈ G \ Inndiag(S), следовательно, Shti ≤ G, откуда в G есть инволюция f 2 . Если G — группа из пункта (14) теоремы 2, то ввиду [4, предложения 2.2, 3.1, 4.2] и [10, 2.5.13, 4.9.2] множества
{2} ∪ R1 (q) ∪ R4 (q) и R2 (q) ∪ R6 (q) являются кликами в Γ(G), поэтому ввиду леммы 3 существует
разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть n = 5. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(q + 1, 5)m. Если q = 2, то ввиду
[4, предложения 2.2, 3.1, 4.2] и [10, 2.5.13, 4.9.2] граф Γ(P SU5 (2)) содержит 3-коклику {2, 5, 11}, и
π(Aut(P SU5 (2))) = {2, 3, 5} ∪ {11}, где {2, 3, 5} — клика в Γ(Aut(P SU5 (2))). Следовательно, если
G∼
= Aut(P SU5 (2)), то ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Поэтому можно считать, что m > 1. Рассмотрим множество {r4 , r6 , r10 }, где r4 ∈ R4m (p) ⊆ R4 (q),
r6 ∈ R6m (p) ⊆ R6 (q) и r10 ∈ R10m (p) ⊆ R10 (q). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r4 , r6 и r10 не
делят |Out(S)|. Из [5, табл. 2] следует, что числа {r4 , r6 , r10 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S), поэтому
они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду леммы 4.
Пусть n = 6. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(q + 1, 6)m. Рассмотрим множество
{r3 , r4 , r10 }, где r3 ∈ R3m (p), r4 ∈ R4m (p) и r10 ∈ R10m (p), если (m, p) 6= (2, 2), и r3 = 13, r4 = 17 и
r10 = 41, если (m, p) = (2, 2). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r3 , r4 и r10 не делят |Out(S)|. Из [5,
табл. 2] следует, что числа {r3 , r4 , r10 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S), поэтому они образуют 3-коклику
в Γ(G) ввиду леммы 4.
Пусть n ≥ 7. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(q + 1, n)m. Рассмотрим множество
{a, b, c}, где a ∈ R2mn (p), b ∈ R2m(n−2) (p) и c ∈ Rm(n−2+ε1) (p), если ε ∈ {+, −} и n ≡ ε1 (mod 4);
a ∈ R2m(n−1) (p), b ∈ R2m(n−3) (p) и c ∈ Rmn (p), если n ≡ 0 (mod 4); a ∈ R2m(n−1) (p), b ∈ R2m(n−3) (p)
и c ∈ Rm(n−2) (p), если n ≡ 2 (mod 4). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа a, b и c не делят |Out(S)|.
Из [5, табл. 2] следует, что числа {a, b, c} образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S), поэтому они образуют 3коклику в Γ(G) ввиду леммы 4. Лемма доказана.
ЛЕММА 11. Пусть S ∼
= P Spn (q), где n ≥ 4 четно, q = pm ≥ 2 и (n, q) 6= (4, 2). Тогда
(1) Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик, если, и только если выполняется одно из следующих утверждений:
(i) S ∼
= P Sp6 (2);
(ii) G — группа из пункта (15) теоремы 2;
(2) для каждой группы G из пункта (1) леммы граф Γ(G) равен графу Грюнберга–Кегеля подходящей разрешимой группы.
Доказательство. Рассмотрим случай n = 4. Пусть r ∈ π(|G : S|) \ π(S), тогда r 6∈ {2, 3} и r делит
8
m. Пусть x — любой элемент порядка r, y — любой элемент порядка r2 ∈ R2m (p) и z — любой
элемент порядка r4 ∈ R4m (p) из G. Тогда y и z лежат в Inndiag(S) и x ∈ G \ Inndiag(S). Ввиду
[10, предложения 4.9.1] имеем CInndiag(S) (x) = P Sp4 (pm/r ) и числа r2 и r4 не делят |CInndiag(S) (x)|.
Таким образом, числа {r, r2 , r4 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G). Пусть π(G) = π(S). Ввиду [3, теорема 1]
Γ(S) состоит из двух непересекающихся клик, следовательно ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая
группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть n ≥ 6. Тогда ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(q − 1, 2)m. Если (n, q) = (6, 2), то
π(S) = π(Aut(S)) и Γ(S) состоит из двух непересекающихся клик ввиду [3, теорема 1], следовательно
ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H). Если n = 6 и q > 2, то
рассмотрим множество {r3 , r4 , r6 }, где r3 ∈ R3m (p), r4 ∈ R4m (p) и r6 ∈ R6m (p), если (m, p) 6= (2, 2),
и r3 = 7, r4 = 17 и r6 = 13, если (m, p) = (2, 2). Заметим, что числа r3 , r4 и r6 нечетны и отличны
от 3. Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r3 , r4 и r6 не делят |Out(S)|. Из [5, табл. 3] следует, что
числа {r3 , r4 , r6 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S), поэтому они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G) ввиду леммы
4.
Пусть n ≥ 8. Рассмотрим множество {a, b, c}, где a ∈ Rmn (p), b ∈ Rm(n−2) (p) и c ∈ Rm(n−4) (p),
если (m, n, p) 6= (1, 8, 2), (1, 10, 2); {a, b, c} = {5, 7, 17}, если (m, n, p) = (1, 8, 2); {a, b, c} = {7, 17, 31},
если (m, n, p) = (1, 10, 2). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа a, b и c не делят |Out(S)|. Из [5,
табл. 2] следует, что числа {a, b, c} образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S), поэтому они образуют 3-коклику в
Γ(G) ввиду леммы 4. Лемма доказана.
ЛЕММА 12. Пусть S ∼
= P Ωn+1 (q), где n ≥ 6 четно и q = pm нечетно. Тогда Γ(G) содержит
3-коклику.
Доказательство. Ввиду [4, предложения 3.1, 4.3] и [5, предложение 2.4] имеем Γ(P Spn (q)) =
Γ(P Ωn+1 (q)). Ввиду [9] имеем |Out(P Spn (q))| = |Out(P Ωn+1 (q))|. Из доказательства леммы 11 следует, что Γ(P Spn (q)) при n ≥ 6 и нечетном q содержит 3-коклику {a, b, c} такую, что числа a, b и c
не делят |Out(P Spn (q))|. Применение леммы 4 завершает доказательство.
ЛЕММА 13. Пусть S ∼
= P Ωεn (q), где n ≥ 8 четно, ε ∈ {+, −} и q = pm ≥ 2. Тогда
(1) Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик тогда и только тогда, когда S ∼
= P Ω+
8 (2);
+
∼
(2) если S = P Ω8 (2), то существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Доказательство. Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.A] имеем |Out(S)| = 2λ(q n/2 − ε1, 4)m, где λ = 3, если
(n, ε) = (8, +) и λ = 1 иначе. Если (n, q, ε) = (8, 2, +), то ввиду [3, теорема 1] Γ(S) состоит из двух
непересекающихся клик, следовательно ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая,
что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Пусть (n, q, ε) 6= (8, 2, +). Ввиду [15, табл. 3.5.E, 3.5.F] в S существует максимальная подгруппа
T , изоморфная P Ωn−1 (q). Ввиду [9] имеем |Out(S)| = |Out(T )|, если (n, ε) 6= (8, +), и π(Out(S)) ⊆
π(T ) ∪ {3}, если (n, ε) = (8, +). Кроме того, если q четно, то ввиду [9] имеем P Spn (q) ∼
= P Ωn+1 (q).
Из доказательств лемм 11 и 12 следует, что Γ(T ) содержит 3-коклику {a, b, c} такую, что числа a,
b и c не делят |Out(T )|. Кроме того, в случае T ∼
= P Sp6 (q), где q 6= 2, числа a, b и c отличны от 3.
Применение леммы 4 завершает доказательство.
ЛЕММА 14. Пусть S — простая исключительная группа лиева типа над полем порядка q = pm .
Тогда
(1) Γ(G) не содержит 3-коклик тогда и только тогда, когда S ∼
= 3 D4 (2);
3
∼
(2) если S = D4 (2), то существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H).
Доказательство. Пусть S ∼
= E8 (q). Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = m. Из [5, табл. 4]
следует, что числа r30 ∈ R30m (p), r24 ∈ R24m (p) и r20 ∈ R20m (p) образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S). Ввиду
малой теоремы Ферма числа r30 , r24 и r20 не делят |Out(S)|, ввиду леммы 4 они образуют 3-коклику
в Γ(G).
Пусть S ∼
= E7 (q). Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = (2, q − 1)m. Из [5, табл. 4] следует,
что числа r18 ∈ R18m (p), r14 ∈ R14m (p) и r12 ∈ R12m (p) образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S). Ввиду малой
теоремы Ферма числа r18 , r14 и r12 не делят |Out(S)|, ввиду леммы 4 они образуют 3-коклику в
Γ(G).
Пусть S ∼
= E6 (q). Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(3, q − 1)m. Из [5, табл. 4] следует,
что числа r9 ∈ R9m (p), r8 ∈ R8m (p) и r5 ∈ R5m (p) образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S). Ввиду малой теоремы
Ферма числа r9 , r8 и r5 не делят |Out(S)|, поэтому ввиду леммы 4 они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
9
Пусть S ∼
= 2 E6 (q). Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = 2(3, q + 1)m. Из [5, табл. 4] следует,
что числа из r18 ∈ R18m (p), r12 ∈ R12m (p) и r10 ∈ R10m (p) образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S). Ввиду
малой теоремы Ферма числа r18 , r12 и r10 не делят |Out(S)|, поэтому ввиду леммы 4 они образуют
3-коклику в Γ(G).
Пусть S ∼
= 3 D4 (q). Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = 3m. Если q = 2, то то ввиду [9] имеем
π(S) = π(Aut(S)) = {2, 3, 7} ∪ {13} и множества {2, 3, 7} и {13} являются кликами в Γ(S). Таким
образом, ввиду леммы 3 существует разрешимая группа H такая, что Γ(G) = Γ(H). Если q = 4,
то числа 7 ∈ R3 (4), 13 ∈ R6 (4) и 241 ∈ R12 (4) образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S) и не делят |Out(S)| = 6,
поэтому ввиду леммы 4 они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G). Предположим, что q > 2 и q 6= 4. Тогда
из [5, табл. 4] следует, что числа из r3 ∈ R3m (p), r6 ∈ R6m (p) и r12 ∈ R12m (p) образуют 3-коклику
в Γ(S). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r3 , r6 и r12 не делят |Out(S)|, поэтому ввиду леммы 4
они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Пусть S ∼
= F4 (q). Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = (2, p)m. Из [5, табл. 4] следует, что
числа r12 ∈ R12m (p), r8 ∈ R8m (p) и r4 ∈ R4m (p) образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S). Ввиду малой теоремы
Ферма числа r12 , r8 и r4 не делят |Out(S)|, ввиду леммы 4 они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Пусть S ∼
= 2 F4 (22n+1 ), где n ≥ 1. Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = 2n + 1. Пусть n ≥ 2.
Из [5, табл. 4] следует, что любые числа s2 ∈ R4n+2 (2) ⊂ π(22n+1 + 1) \ {3}, s3 ∈ R8n+4 (2) ⊂
π(24n+2 + 1) \ {3} и s4 ∈ R12n+6 (2) ⊂ π(24n+2 − 22n+1 + 1) \ {3} образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S). Ввиду
малой теоремы Ферма числа s2 , s3 и s4 не делят 2n+1, теперь из леммы 4 следует, что они образуют
3-коклику в Γ(G). Пусть n = 1. Из [5, табл. 4] следует, что числа 2, 19 и 37 образуют 3-коклику в
Γ(S). Поскольку эти числа не делят |Out(S)|, из леммы 4 следует, что они образуют 3-коклику в
Γ(G).
Пусть S ∼
= 2 F4 (2)′ . Ввиду [9] имеем |Out(S)| = 2. Из [5, табл. 4] следует, что числа 3, 5 и 13
образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S). Поскольку эти числа не делят |Out(S)|, из леммы 4 следует, что они
образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
(3,p)−1
Пусть S ∼
= G2 (q). Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = 2 2 m. Пусть r6 ∈ R6m (p), r3 ∈
R3m (p) и r2 ∈ R2m (p), если (m, p) 6= (2, 2), (3, 2), r6 = 13, r3 = 7 и r2 = 5, если (m, p) = (2, 2), r6 = 19,
r3 = 73 и r2 = 7, если (m, p) = (3, 2). Из [5, табл. 4] следует, что числа {r6 , r3 , r2 } образуют 3-коклику
в Γ(S). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа r6 , r3 и r2 не делят |Out(S)|, поэтому ввиду леммы 4
они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Пусть S ∼
= 2 G2 (32n+1 ), где n ≥ 1. Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = 2n + 1. Из [5, табл. 4]
следует, что любые числа s1 ∈ R2n+1 (3) ⊂ π(32n+1 − 1), s2 ∈ R4n+2 (3) ⊂ π(32n+1 + 1) и s3 ∈
R12n+6 (3) ⊂ π(34n+2 − 32n+1 + 1) образуют 3-коклику в Γ(S). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа
s1 , s2 и s3 не делят 2n + 1, теперь из леммы 4 следует, что они образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G).
Пусть S ∼
= 2 B2 (22n+1 ), где n ≥ 1. Ввиду [15, табл. 5.1.B] имеем |Out(S)| = 2n + 1. Из [5, табл. 4]
следует, что числа 2, s1 ∈ R2n+1 (2) ⊂ π(22n+1 −1) и s2 ∈ R8n+4 (2) ⊂ π(24n+2 +1) образуют 3-коклику
в Γ(S). Ввиду малой теоремы Ферма числа s1 и s2 не делят 2n + 1, теперь из леммы 4 следует, что
числа {2, s1 , s2 } образуют 3-коклику в Γ(G). Лемма доказана.
Доказательство теорем 1 и 2 следует из лемм 7–14.
Список литературы
[1] Lucido M. C. The diameter of the prime graph of finite groups// J. Group Theory, Vol. 2, no. 2
(1999). P. 157–172.
[2] Gruber A., et. al., A characterization of the prime graphs of solvable groups// J. Algebra. Vol. 442
(2015). P. 397–422.
[3] Зиновьева М. Р., Мазуров В. Д. О конечных группах с несвязным графом простых чисел //
Труды ИММ УрО РАН. Т. 18, № 3 (2012). С. 99–105.
[4] Васильев А. В., Вдовин Е. П. Критерий смежности в графе простых чисел конечной простой
группы// Алгебра и логика. Т. 44, № 6 (2005). С. 682—725.
[5] Васильев А. В., Вдовин Е. П. Коклики максимального размера в графе простых чисел конечной
простой группы// Алгебра и логика. Т. 50, № 4 (2011). С. 425—470.
10
[6] Higman G. Finite groups in which every element has prime power order// J. London Math. Soc. (2).
Vol. 32 (1957). P. 335–342.
[7] Gorenstein D. Finite groups. N. Y.: Harper and Row, 1968.
[8] Harrary F. Graph theory. Massachussets: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
[9] Atlas of finite groups/ J.H. Conway, R.T. Curtis, S.P. Norton, R.A. Parker, R.A. Wilson. Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1985.
[10] Gorenstein D., Lyons R., Solomon R. The classification of the finite simple groups, Number 3//
Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. 1994. Vol. 40, № 3.
[11] Zsigmondy K. Zur Theorie der Potenzreste // Monatsh. Math. Phys. V. 3, no. 1 (1892). P. 265–284.
[12] Gerono G.C. Note sur la résolution en nombres entiers et positifs de l’équation xm = y n + 1 //
Nouv. Ann. Math. (2). Vol. 9 (1870). P. 469–471.
[13] Маслова Н. В. О совпадении графов Грюнберга–Кегеля конечной простой группы и ее собственной подгруппы // Труды ИММ УрО РАН. Т. 20, № 1 (2014). С. 156–168.
[14] Кондратьев А.С., Мазуров В.Д. Распознавание знакопеременных групп простой степени по
порядкам их элементов. // Сиб. мат. журн. Т. 41, № 2 (2000). С. 359–369.
[15] Kleidman P., Liebeck M. The subgroup structure of the finite classical groups. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1990. 303 p.
[16] Бутурлакин А. А. Спектры конечных линейных и унитарных групп// Алгебра и логика. Т. 47,
№ 2 (2008). С. 157–173.
Сведения об авторах:
ГОРШКОВ Илья Борисович,
РОССИЯ, г. Екатеринбург, ул. С.Ковалевской, 16, 620990,
Институт математики и механики им. Н.Н. Красовского УрО РАН,
е-mail: [email protected]
МАСЛОВА Наталья Владимировна,
РОССИЯ, г. Екатеринбург, ул. С.Ковалевской, 16, 620990,
Институт математики и механики им. Н.Н. Красовского УрО РАН,
РОССИЯ, г. Екатеринбург, ул. Мира, 19, 620002,
Уральский федеральный университет,
е-mail: [email protected]
11
| 4math.GR
|
A General Pipeline for 3D Detection of Vehicles
arXiv:1803.00387v1 [cs.CV] 12 Feb 2018
Xinxin Du1 , Marcelo H. Ang Jr.2 , Sertac Karaman3 and Daniela Rus3
Abstract— Autonomous driving requires 3D perception of
vehicles and other objects in the in environment. Much of
the current methods support 2D vehicle detection. This paper
proposes a flexible pipeline to adopt any 2D detection network
and fuse it with a 3D point cloud to generate 3D information
with minimum changes of the 2D detection networks. To
identify the 3D box, an effective model fitting algorithm is
developed based on generalised car models and score maps.
A two-stage convolutional neural network (CNN) is proposed
to refine the detected 3D box. This pipeline is tested on the
KITTI dataset using two different 2D detection networks.
The 3D detection results based on these two networks are
similar, demonstrating the flexibility of the proposed pipeline.
The results rank second among the 3D detection algorithms,
indicating its competencies in 3D detection.
I. INTRODUCTION
Vision-based car detection has been well developed and
widely implemented using deep learning technologies. The
KITTI [1] benchmark site reports that the state of the art
algorithms are able to achieve ∼ 90% average precision (AP).
However, for autonomous vehicles, car detection in 2D
images is not sufficient to provide enough information for
the vehicle to perform planning and decision making due
to the lack of depth data. For a robust and comprehensive
perception system in autonomous vehicle, 3D car detection,
including car dimensions, locations and orientations in the
3D world, is essential. However the state of the art for 3D
car detection algorithms only achieve 62% AP. Gaps still
exist as compared to the 2D detection performance and the
problem remains as challenging.
According to the types of input sources, the current
algorithms for 3D vehicle detection can be categorised into
four major groups, including (1) mono image based, (2)
stereo image, (3) LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), and
(4) fusion between mono image and Lidar.
Mono images lack the depth information to recover the
3D location of detected obstacles, therefore assumptions
and approximations have to be made. Stereo image based
approaches normally involve the construction of depth maps
from stereo correspondence matching. The performance of
this type of approach depends heavily on the depth map
reconstruction and the accuracy drops as distance from the
vehicle increases.
1 Xinxin Du is with the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and
Technology (SMART) Centre, Singapore [email protected]
2 Marcelo H. Ang Jr. is with the National University of Singapore,
Singapore [email protected]
3 Sertac Karaman and Daniela Rus are with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA [email protected]
[email protected]
LiDAR, despite its high cost, is able to provide the most
direct measurement of object location. But it lacks color
information and it is always sparse which poses difficulties in
classification. In order to make use of the full capabilities of
LiDAR and camera, fusion approaches have been proposed
in the literature. To make use of the deep CNN architecture,
the point cloud needs to be transformed into other formats.
In the process of transformation, information is lost.
The prior approaches for 3D vehicle detection are not as
effective as those for 2D detection. Little attention has been
paid to how to transfer the advantages and lessons learnt
from 2D detection approaches to 3D detection approaches.
Moreover, the field is lacking effective 3D detection approaches that enable the existing 2D approaches to provide
3D information. The state of the art 2D approaches can
not be applied to autonomous vehicles which require 3D
information.
In this paper, we propose a flexible 3D vehicle detection
pipeline which can make use of any 2D detection network
and provide accurate 3D detection results by fusing the 2D
network with a 3D point cloud. The general framework
structure is illustrated in Fig. 1. The raw image is passed
to a 2D detection network which provides 2D boxes around
the vehicles in the image plane. Subsequently, a set of 3D
points which fall into the 2D bounding box after projection
is selected. With this set, a model fitting algorithm detects
the 3D location and 3D bounding box of the vehicle. And
then another CNN network, which takes the points that fit
into the 3D bounding box as input, carries out the final 3D
box regression and classification. It requires minimum efforts
to modify the existing 2D networks to fit into the pipeline,
adding just one additional regression term at the output layer
to estimate the vehicle dimensions. The main contributions
of the paper are:
1) A general pipeline that enables any 2D detection
network to provide accurate 3D detection information.
2) Three generalised car models with score maps, which
achieve a more efficient model fitting process.
3) A two-stage CNN that can further improve the detection accuracy.
This pipeline has been tested using two outstanding 2D
networks, PC-CNN [20] and MS-CNN [21]. The 3D detection performances based on both networks were evaluated
using the KITTI dataset [1]. We significantly lead the majority of the algorithms in both bird eye detection and 3D
detection tasks. We also achieved comparable results to the
current state of the art algorithm MV3D [19] in both tasks.
20
15
Car dimensions
Generalized models
20
15
10
2D box
2D detection CNN
Final 3D
box
Score
10
Score maps
Projected LiDAR points
LiDAR point subset
Model fitting
3D car points
Refinement
CNN
Final detection
Fig. 1: General fusion pipeline. All of the point clouds shown are in 3D, but viewed from the top (bird’s eye view). The
height is encoded by color, with red being the ground. A subset of points is selected based on the 2D detection. Then, a
model fitting algorithm based on the generalised car models and score maps is applied to find the car points in the subset
and a two-stage refinement CNN is designed to fine tune the detected 3D box and re-assign an objectiveness score to it.
II. R ELATED WORKS
This section reviews the works that are related to the
proposed pipeline in details. It also highlights the differences
between our proposal and the prior works.
Mono Image Approaches: In [2], a new network was
designed to estimate the car dimensions, orientations and
probabilities given a detected 2D box from an existing
network. Using the criterion the perspective projection of
a 3D box should fit tightly with the 2D box in the image,
3D box was recovered by using the estimated information.
Similarly in DeepMANTA [3], the vehicle orientation and
size were estimated from a deep CNN. Additionally, the
network also estimated 36 locations of key points on the car
in the image coordinates. A 2D/3D shape matching algorithm
[4] was applied to estimate vehicle 3D poses based on these
36 2D part locations.
Another set of algorithms, e.g. [5], [6], [7] and [8], defined
3D car models with occlusion patterns, carried out detection
of the patterns in the 2D image and recovered the 3D
occluded structure by reasoning through a MAP (maximum
a posteriori) framework.
These approaches are sensitive to the assumptions made
and the parameter estimation accuracy. As shown in the result
section, our method outperforms them significantly.
Stereo Image Approaches: The depth map from stereo
correspondence is normally appended to the RGB image as
the fourth channel. The RGB-D image is passed to one or
more CNNs in order to carry out the detection. In [9], Pham
et al. proposed a two-stream CNN where the depth channel
and RGB channel went through two separate CNN branches
and were fused before the fully connected layers.
Lidar Approaches: The common framework involves
three steps: pre-processing (e.g. voxelization), segmentation
and classification. A detailed review of LiDAR approaches
can be found in [10]. Wang et al. [11] proposed a different
approach where the point cloud was converted into 3D
feature grids and a 3D detection window was slid through the
feature grids to identify vehicles. In [12], the point cloud was
converted into a 2D point map and a CNN was designed to
identify the vehicle bounding boxes in the 2D point map. In
[13], the authors extended the approach of [12] and applied
3D deep CNN directly on the point cloud. However, this
approach is very time consuming and memory intensive due
to the 3D convolutions involved. To improve, [14] proposed
a voting mechanism able to perform sparse 3D convolution.
Fusion Approaches: In [17], the sparse point cloud is
converted to a dense depth image, which is similar to a
stereo one. The RGB-D image was passed through a CNN
for detection. In [18], the point cloud was converted into a
three-channel map HHA which contains horizontal disparity,
height above ground and angle in each channel. The resulting
six-channel image RGB-HHA was processed by a CNN for
detection of vehicles. However these two methods will not be
able to output the 3D information directly from the network.
In oder to address this, MV3D (multi-view 3D) detection
network proposed by Chen et al. [19] included one more type
of input generated from the point cloud, the bird’s eye view
feature input. This input has no projective loss as compared
to the depth map, thus 3D proposal boxes can be generated
directly. This approach has achieved the current state of the
art in 3D vehicle detection. It generates 2D boxes from 3D
boxes while ours generate 3D boxes from 2D boxes. And
MV3D explores the entire point cloud while ours only focus
on a few subsets of the point cloud, which is more efficient
and saves computation power.
2D Detection: The proposed pipeline is flexible in regards
to the choice of 2D detection networks. Only a slight change
is required on the last fully connected layer of the network
so that it is able to estimate the dimensions of the cars. Both
[2] and [3] proposed ways to encode the car dimensions to
the network. For better accuracy, the 2D detection networks
proposed in [22], [3] and [23] can be incorporated since
they are the leading networks for 2D detection. For faster
computation, the approaches presented in [24] and [25] can
be implemented. In this paper, we implement PC-CNN [20]
and MS-CNN [21] to demonstrate the flexibility of the
pipeline.
Model Fitting: In [5], Xiang et al. proposed 3D voxel
patterns (3DVPs) as the 3D car model. 3DVPs encode
the occlusion, self-occlusion and truncation information. A
boosting detector was designed to identify the 3DVPs in
the image, while [6] implemented a sub-category awareness
CNN for 3DVP detection.
Deformable part-based models (DPM) can be found in
[26], [27], [28] and [29]. Different classifiers were trained to
detect DPM. Fidler et al. extended the DPM to a 3D cuboid
model in [30] in order to allow reasoning in 3D. In [8], [31],
[7] and [3], 3D wireframe models were used. Similarly, each
wire vertex is encoded with its visibility.
Due to the various vehicle types, sizes, and occlusion
patterns, these prior approaches require a substantial number
of models in order to cover all possible cases. In our
approach, only three models are used and the occlusion
pattern is assigned online when doing model fitting.
III. T ECHNICAL A PPROACH
The input is an image. The first step is to generate 2D
bounding boxes for the candidate vehicles. Secondly, these
bounding boxes are used to select subsets of the point
clouds, using the transformation between the camera and
LiDAR. Due to the perspective nature of the camera, the 3D
point subset may spread across a much larger area than the
vehicle itself as shown in Fig.1. This subset also contains
a substantial number of non-vehicle points and points on
neighbouring vehicles. All these artefacts add challenges to
the 3D box detection.
The 3D box proposals are generated following the principle of RANSAC algorithm (random sample consensus). In
each iteration, one point is selected randomly. A second point
is randomly selected from points within the cube centred at
the first point and with the side length of 1.5l, where l is the
car length from the 2D CNN dimension estimation and 1.5
compensates the estimation error. A vertical plane is derived
from these two points. Any points with a distance to the
plane less than a threshold are considered as inliers to the
plane. A maximum 20 points are then randomly selected
from the inliers. At each point, a second vertical plane,
passing through that point and perpendicular to the first
vertical plane, is derived.
Along the intersection line between these two vertical
planes, eight 3D boxes can be generated based on the
estimated car width and length. Since the first vertical plane
is visible, based on the view direction, four boxes are
eliminated. At each of the remaining box locations, a new
range is defined by expanding the box by 1.5 times along
both w and l directions. The lowest point within the new
range can be found and it determines the ground of the 3D
box while the roof of the 3D box is set based on the height
estimation. In summary, at each iteration, maximum 80 3D
box proposals can be generated.
A. Car dimension estimation
One additional regression layer is needed at the end of
the given 2D detection network. This regression method was
inspired by [3] and [2]. First the average dimensions for all
¯ w̄]
the cars and vans in KITTI dataset is obtained. Let [h̄, l,
denote height, length and width of the vehicle. The ground
truth regression vector ∆∗i = (δh , δl , δw ) is defined as:
δh = log(h∗ /h̄)
¯
δl = log(l ∗ /l)
δw = log(w∗ /w̄)
(1)
The dimension regression loss is shown as:
Ld (i) = λd Ci R(∆i − ∆∗i )
(2)
where λd is the weighting factor to balance the losses defined
in the original network, e.g. classification loss, 2D box
regression loss; Ci is 1 if the 2D box is a car and 0 otherwise;
R is the smooth L1 loss function defined in [32] and ∆i is
the regression vector from the network.
To train the modified network, we can reuse the pre-trained
weights from the original network for initialisation. Only a
small part of the network needs to be re-trained while the
rest can be kept as fixed during training. For example, in
MS-CNN, we only re-trained the convolution layer and the
fully connected layers after ROI pooling in the detection subnetwork and in PC-CNN, we re-trained the GoogleNet layer,
convolution layer and the fully connected layers after the Deconvolution layer in the detection sub-network.
B. Vehicle model fitting
We first generate a set of 3D box proposals. For each
proposal, the points within the 3D box are compared to the
three generalised car models. The proposal with the highest
score is selected for the two-stage CNN refinement.
(a) SUV
(b) Sedan
(c) Van
Fig. 2: Generalised car models
Only three generalised car models are used for model
fitting. They represent three categories of cars, SUVs, Sedans
and Vans. Hatchback cars are considered to be SUVs. We
observe that the relative distances/positions between different
parts of a car do not vary significantly for different cars
from the same category even with different sizes. This
invariance indicates that if the cars under the same category
are normalised to the same dimension [h, l, w], their shapes
and contours will be similar. We verified this and generalised
the car models by normalising the cars in the 3D CAD
dataset used in [3], [30] and [33]. Figure 2 illustrates the
side view of the point cloud plots for the three categories.
Each plot is an aggregation of the points that are generated
from the 3D CAD models, aligned to the same direction
and normalised to the same dimension. The SUV/hatchback
plot consists of points from 58 CAD models, the sedan plot
consists of 65 point sets, and the van plot consists of points
from 10 models.
Each aggregation is then voxelized to a 8 × 18 × 10 matrix
along the [h l w] direction. Each element in the matrix is
assigned different scores based on its position. The elements
representing the car shell/surface are assigned a score of 1,
indicating that 3D points in the model fitting process fall on
the car surface will be counted towards the overall score.
The elements inside or outside the car shell are assigned
negative scores, and the further away they get from the car
shell (either inwards or outwards), the smaller the assigned
values. This indicates that no points should be detected from
outside or inside the car by LiDAR and the overall score will
be penalised for such detections. The elements at the bottom
layer of the matrix are assigned a score of 0. Points detected
at the bottom layer could be the ground or car’s tires, which
are difficult to distinguish from each other. They will not be
penalised or counted.
Fig. 3: Score map (scores are indicated at bottom.)
Self-occlusion can be easily determined from the view direction. This is encoded online when doing the model fitting
since view direction changes for different 3D box proposals.
Negative scores are assigned to the car surface elements if
they are self-occluded. Furthermore, for simplicity, only the
four vertical facets are considered for self-occlusion analysis
while car roof and bottom are not considered.
Two slices of the score assignment from the SUV category
are shown in Fig. 3, with the left image depicting the side
facet and the right image illustrating the center slice. The
car exterior and interior are indicated by orange and blue
while the bottom is indicated white. Yellow and green refer
to the shell/surface of the car, while green further indicates
that those areas might be self-occluded.
Points within the 3D box proposals will be voxelised
into 8 × 18 × 10 grids and compared to the three potential
vehicle models. Due to the orientation ambiguity, the grids
are rotated around their vertical center axis by 180 degree
and are then compared to the three models. Out of all the
bounding box proposals, the one with the highest score is
selected for the next step.
C. Two-stage refinement CNN
To further align the detected 3D box to the point cloud, we
designed a two-stage CNN. In the literature, 3D CNNs are
commonly used to process 3D point clouds, e.g. [12]. However, these CNNs are extremely slow and memory intensive.
In this paper, we found that 2D CNNs are sufficient.
With the points in a given 3D box, the first CNN outputs
a new 3D box. A new set of points can be found within the
new 3D box. The second CNN outputs a probability score
based on the new set of points to indicate how likely these
points represent an actual car.
However, point sets cannot be input to the CNN directly.
We apply normalization and voxelization strategies in order
to formalize the points in matrix form in order to fit to
the CNN. Furthermore, consistent with 2D image detection
cases [34], [21], a bounding box context is able to provide
additional information to improve the detection accuracy. We
also include the context of the 3D bounding box as input to
the CNN.
Given a 3D box from the model fitting process, our
pipeline expands it along its h, l, w directions by 1.5, 1.5,
and 1.6 times respectively to include its context. The points
inside this expanded box are normalised and voxelised into
a 24 × 54 × 32 matrix. The matrix is sparse with ∼ 0.6% occupied elements on average. As compared to the generalised
model, we doubled the resolution of the voxelisation in order
to reserve more spatial details and patterns of the distribution
of the points. Note that the normalisation is anisometric, it
has different scale ratios along different directions.
The backbones of the CNNs in both stages are based
on the VGG-net with configuration D as described in [35].
After each convolution, an ELU (exponential linear units)
layer [36], instead of Re(ctified)LU layer, is adopted for a
more stable training process. The first stage CNN has two
parallel outputs, one for 3D box regression and the other
for classification, while the second stage CNN only has one
output, classification.
δx∗c = (Xc∗ − Xc )/L
δy∗c = (Yc∗ −Yc )/H
δz∗c = (Zc∗ − Zc )/W
δx∗l = (Xl∗ − Xl )/L
δy∗l = (Yl∗ −Yl )/H
δz∗l = (Zl∗ − Zl )/W
δw∗
∗
= log(W /W )
(3)
The classification loss for both CNNs is So f tMax loss
and the 3D box regression loss is SmoothL1 loss. The
ground truth regression vector ∆∗3d defined in (3) has seven
elements, three for the center of the box, three for the
left bottom corner and one for the width. It is just sufficient to recover the 3D bounding box from these seven
elements. Due to the anisometric normalisation, a quartic
polynomial needs to be solved. Note that across all the inputs,
Xc/l , Yc/l , Zc/l , L, H, W are all constant as all the 3D boxes
are aligned and normalised to the same size.
Classification has two classes, car and background. A 3D
box is classified as positive when the IOU (intersection of
union) between its bird’s eye view box and the ground truth
bird’s eye view box is greater than a specific threshold.
This threshold is 0.5 for the first stage CNN and 0.7 for
the second. 0.7 is consistent with the criteria set by KITTI
benchmark. The reason to set a lower threshold for the first
stage is to train the network so that it is able to refine the
boxes with IoU between 0.5 to 0.7 to a better position where
the IoU may be greater than 0.7; otherwise the network will
take those boxes as negative and will not be trained to refine
them.
The training of the two networks is carried out independently as they do not share layers. The training batch size
is 128, with 50% being positive. Both CNNs are trained for
10K iterations with a constant learning rate of 0.0005.
IV. EXPERIMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
To verify the flexibility of our approach, the pipeline is
tested using PC-CNN [20] and MS-CNN [21]. The performance based on both networks is evaluated using the
challenging KITTI dataset [1], which contains 7481 images
for training/validation and 7518 images for testing. The
training/validation set has annotated ground truth for 2D
TABLE I: Average Precision benchmark for bird’s eye view and 3D box based on KITTI validation set.
Bird’s Eye View
Algorithm
∗ Mono3D
[38]
∗ 3DOP [5]
∗∗ Deep3DBox [2]
∗ VeloFCN [12]
∗ MV3D [19]
Ours (MS-CNN [21])
Ours (PC-CNN [20])
∗
Easy
30.50
55.04
29.96
79.68
96.34
90.36
88.31
IoU = 0.5
Moderate
22.39
41.25
24.91
63.82
89.39
88.46
83.74
Hard
19.16
34.55
19.46
62.80
88.67
84.75
79.62
Easy
5.22
12.63
9.01
40.14
86.55
82.17
83.61
3D Box
IoU = 0.7
Moderate
5.19
9.49
7.94
32.08
78.10
77.15
77.36
Hard
4.13
7.59
6.57
30.47
76.67
74.42
69.61
Easy
25.19
46.04
24.76
67.92
96.02
87.16
87.69
IoU = 0.5
Moderate
18.20
34.63
21.95
57.57
89.05
87.38
79.92
Hard
15.52
30.09
16.87
52.56
88.38
79.40
78.65
Easy
2.53
6.55
5.40
15.20
71.29
55.82
57.63
IoU = 0.7
Moderate
2.31
5.07
5.66
13.66
62.68
55.26
51.74
Hard
2.31
4.10
3.97
15.98
56.56
51.89
51.39
sources from [19]
sources from [2], which uses different validation set, so its APs are calculated from the 1848 common images with our validation set.
∗∗
bounding box in the image plane and 3D bounding box in
real world. Following [37], we split the training/validation
set into training and validation sub-sets. The training sub-set
is purely used to train the car dimension regression and twostage CNN while the validation sub-set is for evaluation only.
KITTI divides the cars into easy, moderate and hard groups
based on their visibilities. We follow this same convention
for our evaluation. To further verify the performance of
the proposed pipeline, we also tested it using our own
autonomous vehicles.
Metrics: The primary focus of this paper is on 3D
detection, we do not evaluate the performance of the pipeline
for 2D detection tasks. Following the evaluation metrics
proposed in [19], we evaluate our proposal based on the
Average Precession (AP) for bird’s eye view boxes and
for 3D boxes. The bird’s eye view boxes are generated by
projecting the 3D boxes on the same ground plane. The AP
is calculated based on the IoU between the output boxes and
the ground truth boxes, while in [5] and [3], the distance
between two boxes are used. We feel that IoU is a more
comprehensive index than distance, as it implicitly accounts
for not only distance but also alignment and size.
Bird’s Eye View & 3D Box AP: We compare the outputs from our pipeline with other algorithms which can
output 3D box information, including Mono3D [38], 3DOP
[5] and Deep3DBox [2] which use image data only, VeloFCN
[12] which uses LiDAR data only and MV3D [19] which
uses fusion.
The IoU threshold for true positive detection is set at
0.5 and 0.7. The left part of TABLE I shows the results
from bird’s eye view. In general, the point cloud based
approaches all significantly lead the image-based approaches
for both IoUs. Within the point cloud based approaches, our
pipeline outperforms VeloFCN significantly but underperforms MV3D marginally. When IoU = 0.5, our performance
with PC-CNN is about 7% worse on average than MV3D and
5% worse for MS-CNN. When IoU = 0.7, the performances
with PC-CNN and MS-CNN are both very close to MV3D
except for the performance with PC-CNN for the hard group
(7% worse than MV3D).
The 3D box detection comparisons are listed in the right
part of TABLE I. Similarly for both IoU thresholds, our
method significantly outperforms all the approaches with
the single exception of MV3D. On average, the overall
performance is about 10% worse than MV3D for both IoU =
0.5 and 0.7 except that the performance with MS-CNN for
moderate group at IoU = 0.5 is only 1.6% less than MV3D.
We only use point clouds to generate the 3D box and
do not take any color information from the image into
account. Comparing it to VeloFCN, which also only takes
point clouds as inputs, shows the effectiveness of our approach, processing the point cloud as subsets instead of as
a whole. Comparing to MV3D, image color information is
necessary to further boost the performance of our pipeline.
One possible solution is to extract the feature layer which
is right before the ROI pooling layer in the 2D detection
CNN. Based on the 3D box from the model fitting process,
we could find its corresponding 2D box in the image plane
and carry out ROI pooling on the extracted feature layer
in order to extract the feature vector. Then fuse the feature
vector with the one from the refinement CNN to output the
final 3D box and its probability.
Flexibility Anlysis: The comparison between the two approaches using the proposed pipeline verifies the flexibility of
our pipeline. PC-CNN and MS-CNN have different network
structures. But both approaches achieve comparable AP for
the two tasks and IoU thresholds. Furthermore, the two-stage
refinement CNN was trained based on the pipeline with PCCNN and re-used in the pipeline with MS-CNN without
any further tuning on the network. This further confirms the
flexibility and adaptability of our proposed pipeline.
Car Dimension Regression Impact: We show the impact from the car dimension regression on the original 2D
detection CNN in TABLE II. Similarly, AP is populated for
the 2D detection task in image plane. Following KITTI, the
IoU threshold is set at 0.7. The left part shows the performance of the original 2D detection CNN while the right
part indicates the results after appending the car dimension
regression term. The impact is not very significant for both
networks, and it even improves the performance marginally
for some groups.
TABLE II: Impact on the original 2D detection CNN from
appending the car dimension regression term.
2D Detection
MS-CNN
PC-CNN
Easy
91.64
94.62
Original
Moderate
89.95
89.60
Hard
79.55
79.97
With Dimension Regression
Easy Moderate
Hard
93.98
89.92
79.69
90.22
89.03
81.64
Fig. 4: Qualitative result illustration on KITTI data (top row) and Boston data (bottom row). Blue boxes are the 3D detection
results.
Ablation Study: To analyse the effectiveness of the steps
involved in the 3D box generation, the AP is calculated after
each step (model fitting, first stage CNN and second stage
CNN) for both bird’s eye view and 3D box tasks. For this
study, the IoU threshold is set to 0.5. Since the results based
on MS-CNN and PC-CNN are quite comparable, only PCCNN results are presented in TABLE III.
The results from the model fitting are not as good as
the final oens, but they are better than all the image based
algorithms in TABLE I and comparable to VeloFCN. This
indicates that the model fitting algorithm can work properly.
TABLE III: Ablation study based on KITTI validation set.
Numbers indicate AP with IoU threshold at 0.5.
Step
Model fitting
First CNN
Second CNN
Bird’s Eye View
Easy Moderate Hard
77.71
73.27
70.06
88.16
83.60
79.65
88.31
83.74
79.62
Easy
56.32
87.51
87.69
3D Box
Moderate
51.33
79.76
79.92
Hard
47.40
78.81
78.65
With the first CNN, the detection performance is improved
significantly in both bird’s eye view and 3D box tasks. The
improvement is ∼ 10% and ∼ 30% respectively. This shows
that although only 2D convolution is used and the input 3D
matrix is very sparse, the network is still very powerful and
effective to locate the 3D box. The improvement from the
second CNN is insignificant since it is not designed to regress
the 3D box. It is designed to reshuffle the probability of the
3D box from the first CNN.
Qualitative Results: The first row in Fig. 4 shows some
of the 3D detection results by applying our pipeline with PCCNN on KITTI validation dataset. We also tested it using our
own dataset collected at Boston USA. The setup of the data
collection vehicle is similar to KITTI, with differences in the
relative positions between the LiDAR, camera and the car.
We applied the pipeline, which is trained based on KITTI
training dataset, directly on the Boston data without any
fine-tuning of the network weights. The system still works as
shown in the second row of Fig. 4. It shows the generalisation
capability of the proposed pipeline and indicates its potentials
in executing 3D vehicle detection in real situations beyond a
pre-designed dataset. Interested readers may refer to the link
for video illustrations (https://www.dropbox.com/
s/5hzjvw911xa5mye/kitti_3d.avi?dl=0).
V. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper we propose a flexible 3D vehicle detection
pipeline which is able to adopt the advantages of any 2D
detection networks in order to provide 3D information. The
effort to adapt the 2D networks to the pipeline is minimal.
One additional regression term is needed at the network
output to estimate vehicle dimensions. The pipeline also
takes advantage of point clouds in 3D measurements. An
effective model fitting algorithm based on generalised car
models and score maps is proposed to fit the 3D bounding
boxes from the point cloud. Finally a two-stage CNN is
developed to fine tune the 3D box. The outstanding results
based on two different 2D networks indicate the flexibility
of the pipeline and its capability in 3D vehicle detection.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was supported by the National Research
Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, under its
CREATE programme, Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research
and Technology (SMART) Future Urban Mobility (FM) IRG.
We are grateful for their support.
R EFERENCES
[1] A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, “Are we ready for autonomous
driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite,” in Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012.
[2] A. Mousavian, D. Anguelov, J. Flynn, and J. Kosecka, “3d bounding
box estimation using deep learning and geometry,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:1612.00496, 2016.
[3] F. Chabot, M. Chaouch, J. Rabarisoa, C. Teulière, and T. Chateau,
“Deep manta: A coarse-to-fine many-task network for joint 2d and 3d
vehicle analysis from monocular image,” in CVPR, 2017.
[4] V. Lepetit, F. Moreno-Noguer, and P. Fua, “Epnp: An accurate o (n)
solution to the pnp problem,” International journal of computer vision,
vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 155–166, 2009.
[5] Y. Xiang, W. Choi, Y. Lin, and S. Savarese, “Data-driven 3d voxel
patterns for object category recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE
Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1903–
1911, 2015.
[6] Y. Xiang, W. Choi, Y. Lin, and S. Savarese, “Subcategory-aware
convolutional neural networks for object proposals and detection,”
in Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2017 IEEE Winter
Conference on, pp. 924–933, IEEE, 2017.
[7] M. Zeeshan Zia, M. Stark, and K. Schindler, “Are cars just 3d boxes?jointly estimating the 3d shape of multiple objects,” in Proceedings
of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,
pp. 3678–3685, 2014.
[8] M. Zeeshan Zia, M. Stark, and K. Schindler, “Explicit occlusion
modeling for 3d object class representations,” in Proceedings of
the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,
pp. 3326–3333, 2013.
[9] C. C. Pham and J. W. Jeon, “Robust object proposals re-ranking for
object detection in autonomous driving using convolutional neural
networks,” Signal Processing: Image Communication, pp. –, 2017.
[10] S. D. Pendleton, H. Andersen, X. Du, X. Shen, M. Meghjani, Y. H.
Eng, D. Rus, and M. H. Ang, “Perception, planning, control, and
coordination for autonomous vehicles,” Machines, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6,
2017.
[11] D. Z. Wang and I. Posner, “Voting for voting in online point cloud
object detection.,” in Robotics: Science and Systems, 2015.
[12] B. Li, T. Zhang, and T. Xia, “Vehicle detection from 3d lidar using
fully convolutional network,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.07916, 2016.
[13] B. Li, “3d fully convolutional network for vehicle detection in point
cloud,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.08069, 2016.
[14] M. Engelcke, D. Rao, D. Z. Wang, C. H. Tong, and I. Posner,
“Vote3deep: Fast object detection in 3d point clouds using efficient
convolutional neural networks,” in Robotics and Automation (ICRA),
2017 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 1355–1361, IEEE, 2017.
[15] J. R. Schoenberg, A. Nathan, and M. Campbell, “Segmentation of
dense range information in complex urban scenes,” in Intelligent
Robots and Systems (IROS), 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference
on, pp. 2033–2038, IEEE, 2010.
[16] L. Xiao, B. Dai, D. Liu, T. Hu, and T. Wu, “Crf based road detection
with multi-sensor fusion,” in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2015
IEEE, pp. 192–198, IEEE, 2015.
[17] A. Eitel, J. T. Springenberg, L. Spinello, M. Riedmiller, and W. Burgard, “Multimodal deep learning for robust rgb-d object recognition,”
in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 681–687, IEEE, 2015.
[18] J. Schlosser, C. K. Chow, and Z. Kira, “Fusing lidar and images for
pedestrian detection using convolutional neural networks,” in Robotics
and Automation (ICRA), 2016 IEEE International Conference on,
pp. 2198–2205, IEEE, 2016.
[19] X. Chen, H. Ma, J. Wan, B. Li, and T. Xia, “Multi-view 3d object
detection network for autonomous driving,” in CVPR, 2017.
[20] X. Du, M. H. A. Jr., and D. Rus, “Car detection for autonomous
vehicle: Lidar and vision fusion approach through deep learning
framework,” in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2017 IEEE/RSJ
International Conference on, IEEE, 2017.
[21] Z. Cai, Q. Fan, R. S. Feris, and N. Vasconcelos, “A unified multiscale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection,”
in European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 354–370, Springer,
2016.
[22] J. Ren, X. Chen, J. Liu, W. Sun, J. Pang, Q. Yan, Y.-W. Tai, and L. Xu,
“Accurate single stage detector using recurrent rolling convolution,” in
CVPR, 2017.
[23] F. Yang, W. Choi, and Y. Lin, “Exploit all the layers: Fast and accurate
cnn object detector with scale dependent pooling and cascaded rejection classifiers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2129–2137, 2016.
[24] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, “Yolo9000: Better, faster, stronger,” in
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, 2017.
[25] W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.-Y. Fu,
and A. C. Berg, “Ssd: Single shot multibox detector,” in European
Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 21–37, Springer, 2016.
[26] B. Pepik, M. Stark, P. Gehler, and B. Schiele, “Teaching 3d geometry
to deformable part models,” in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pp. 3362–3369, IEEE, 2012.
[27] D. Forsyth, “Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based
models,” Computer, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 6–7, 2014.
[28] J. J. Yebes, L. M. Bergasa, R. Arroyo, and A. Lázaro, “Supervised
learning and evaluation of kitti’s cars detector with dpm,” in Intelligent
Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, 2014 IEEE, pp. 768–773, IEEE,
2014.
[29] B. Pepik, M. Stark, P. Gehler, and B. Schiele, “Multi-view and 3d
deformable part models,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and
machine intelligence, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2232–2245, 2015.
[30] S. Fidler, S. Dickinson, and R. Urtasun, “3d object detection and viewpoint estimation with a deformable 3d cuboid model,” in Advances in
neural information processing systems, pp. 611–619, 2012.
[31] M. Z. Zia, M. Stark, B. Schiele, and K. Schindler, “Detailed 3d representations for object recognition and modeling,” IEEE transactions on
pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2608–
2623, 2013.
[32] R. Girshick, “Fast r-cnn,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International
Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1440–1448, 2015.
[33] L.-C. Chen, S. Fidler, A. L. Yuille, and R. Urtasun, “Beat the mturkers:
Automatic image labeling from weak 3d supervision,” in Proceedings
of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,
pp. 3198–3205, 2014.
[34] S. Bell, C. Lawrence Zitnick, K. Bala, and R. Girshick, “Inside-outside
net: Detecting objects in context with skip pooling and recurrent neural
networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2874–2883, 2016.
[35] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks
for large-scale image recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556,
2014.
[36] D.-A. Clevert, T. Unterthiner, and S. Hochreiter, “Fast and accurate
deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus),” arXiv
preprint arXiv:1511.07289, 2015.
[37] X. Chen, K. Kundu, Y. Zhu, A. G. Berneshawi, H. Ma, S. Fidler, and
R. Urtasun, “3d object proposals for accurate object class detection,”
in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 424–432,
2015.
[38] X. Chen, K. Kundu, Z. Zhang, H. Ma, S. Fidler, and R. Urtasun,
“Monocular 3d object detection for autonomous driving,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, pp. 2147–2156, 2016.
| 1cs.CV
|
On the Information Dimension
of Multivariate Gaussian Processes
Bernhard C. Geiger∗ , Tobias Koch†‡
∗ Signal
arXiv:1712.07863v1 [cs.IT] 21 Dec 2017
† Signal
Processing and Speech Communication Laboratory, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
Theory and Communications Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911, Leganés, Spain
‡ Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Emails: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract—The authors have recently defined the Rényi information dimension rate d({Xt }) of a stationary stochastic process
{Xt , t ∈ Z} as the entropy rate of the uniformly-quantized
process divided by minus the logarithm of the quantizer step
size 1/m in the limit as m → ∞ (B. Geiger and T. Koch,
“On the information dimension rate of stochastic processes,” in
Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT), Aachen, Germany, June
2017). For Gaussian processes with a given spectral distribution
function FX , they showed that the information dimension rate
equals the Lebesgue measure of the set of harmonics where
the derivative of FX is positive. This paper extends this result
to multivariate Gaussian processes with a given matrix-valued
spectral distribution function FX . It is demonstrated that the
information dimension rate equals the average rank of the
derivative of FX . As a side result, it is shown that the scale
and translation invariance of information dimension carries over
from random variables to stochastic processes.
I. I NTRODUCTION
In 1959, Rényi [1] proposed the information dimension
and the d-dimensional entropy to measure the information
content of general random variables (RVs). In recent years,
it was shown that the information dimension is of relevance
in various areas of information theory, including rate-distortion
theory, almost lossless analog compression, or the analysis of
interference channels. For example, Kawabata and Dembo [2]
showed that the information dimension of a RV is equal to its
rate-distortion dimension, defined as twice the rate-distortion
function R(D) divided by − log(D) in the limit as D ↓ 0.
Koch [3] demonstrated that the rate-distortion function of a
source with infinite information dimension is infinite, and
that for any source with finite information dimension and
finite differential entropy the Shannon lower bound on the
rate-distortion function is asymptotically tight. Wu and Verdú
[4] analyzed both linear encoding and Lipschitz decoding of
discrete-time, independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.),
stochastic processes and showed that the information dimension plays a fundamental role in achievability and converse
The work of Bernhard C. Geiger has been funded by the Erwin Schrödinger
Fellowship J 3765 of the Austrian Science Fund. The work of Tobias Koch
has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under
the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
(grant agreement number 714161), from the Spanish Ministerio de Economı́a
y Competitividad under Grants TEC2013-41718-R, RYC-2014-16332 and
TEC2016-78434-C3-3-R (AEI/FEDER, EU), and from the Comunidad de
Madrid under Grant S2103/ICE-2845.
results. Wu et al. [5] showed that the degrees of freedom of
the K-user Gaussian interference channel can be characterized
through the sum of information dimensions. Stotz and Bölcskei
[6] later generalized this result to vector interference channels.
In [7], [8], we proposed the information dimension rate as a
generalization of information dimension from RVs to univariate (real-valued) stochastic processes. Specifically, consider
the stationary process {Xt , t ∈ Z}, and let {[Xt ]m , t ∈ Z}
be the process obtained by uniformly quantizing {Xt } with
step size 1/m. We defined the information dimension rate
d({Xt }) of {Xt } as the entropy rate of {[Xt ]m } divided by
log m in the limit as m → ∞ [8, Def. 2]. We then showed that,
for any stochastic process, d({Xt }) coincides with the ratedistortion dimension of {Xt } [8, Th. 5]. We further showed
that for stationary Gaussian processes with spectral distribution
function FX , the information dimension rate d({Xt }) equals
the Lebesgue measure of the set of harmonics on [−1/2, 1/2]
where the derivative of FX is positive [8, Th. 7]. This implies
an intuitively appealing connection between the information
dimension rate of a stochastic process and its bandwidth.
In this work, we generalize our definition of d({Xt }) to
multivariate processes. Consider the L-variate (real-valued)
stationary process {X t }, and let {[X t ]m } be the process
obtained by quantizing every component process of {X t }
uniformly with step size 1/m. As in the univariate case, the
information dimension rate d({X t }) of {X t } is defined as the
entropy rate of {[X t ]m } divided by log m in the limit as m →
∞. Our main result is an evaluation of d({X t }) for L-variate
Gaussian processes with (matrix-valued) spectral distribution
function FX . We demonstrate that in this case d({X t }) equals
the Lebesgue integral of the rank of the derivative of FX . As
a corollary, we show that the information dimension rate of
univariate complex-valued Gaussian processes is maximized
if the process is proper, in which case it is equal to twice the
Lebesue measure of the set of harmonics where the derivative
of its spectral distribution function FX is positive.
As side results, we show that d({X t }) is scale and translation invariant. These properties are known for the information
dimension of RVs (cf. [9, Lemma 3]), but they do not directly
carry over to our definition of d({X t }), which is why we state
them explicitly in this paper.
II. N OTATION AND P RELIMINARIES
A. Notation
We denote by R, C, and Z the set of real numbers, the set
of complex numbers, and the set of integers, respectively. We
use a calligraphic font, such as F , to denote other sets, and
we denote complements as F c .
The real and imaginary part of a complex number z are
denoted as Re(z) and√Im(z), respectively, i.e., z = Re(z) +
ıIm(z) where ı = −1. The complex conjugate of z is
denoted as z ∗ .
We use upper case letters to denote deterministic matrices
and boldface lower case letters to denote deterministic vectors.
The transpose of a vector or matrix is denoted by (·)T ; the
Hermitian transpose by (·)H . The determinant of a matrix A
is detA.
We denote RVs by upper case letters, e.g., X. For a
finite or countably infinite collection of RVs we abbreviate Xℓk , (Xℓ , . . . , Xk−1 , Xk ), Xℓ∞ , (Xℓ , Xℓ+1 , . . . ),
k
and X−∞
, (. . . , Xk−1 , Xk ). Random vectors are denoted
by boldface upper case letters, e.g., X , (X1 , . . . , XL )T .
Univariate discete-time stochastic processes are denoted as
{Xt , t ∈ Z} or, in short, as {Xt }. For L-variate stochastic
processes we use the same notation but with Xt replaced by
X t , (X1,t , . . . , XL,t ). We call {Xi,t , t ∈ Z} a component
process.
We define the quantization of X with precision m as
[X]m ,
⌊mX⌋
m
(1)
where ⌊a⌋ is the largest integer less than or equal to a.
Likewise, ⌈a⌉ denotes the smallest integer greater than or
equal to a. We denote by [Xℓk ]m = ([Xℓ ]m , . . . , [Xk ]m ) the
component-wise quantization of Xℓk (and similarly for other
finite or countably infinite collections of RVs and random
vectors). Likewise, for complex RVs Z with real part R and
imaginary part I, the quantization [Z]m is equal to [R]m +
ı[I]m . We define C(z1k , a) , [z1 , z1 + a) × · · · × [zk , zk + a).
Thus, C(z1k , a) is a k-dimensional hypercube in Rk , with its
bottom-left corner at z1k and with side length a. For example,
we have that [X1k ]m = z1k if and only if X1k ∈ C(z1k , 1/m).
Let H(·), h(·), and D(·k·) denote entropy, differential
entropy, and relative entropy, respectively, and let I(·; ·) denote
the mutual information [10]. We take logarithms to base e ≈
2.718, so mutual informations and entropies have dimension
nats. The entropy rate of a discrete-valued, stationary L-variate
stochastic process {X t } is [10, Th. 4.2.1]
H(X k1 )
.
H ′ ({X t }) , lim
k→∞
k
(2)
B. Information Dimension of RVs
Rényi defined the information dimension of a collection of
RVs Xℓk as [1]
H [Xℓk ]m
k
d(Xℓ ) , lim
(3)
m→∞
log m
provided the limit exists. If the limit does not exist, one
can define the upper and lower information dimension d(Xℓk )
and d(Xℓk ) by replacing the limit with the limit superior and
limit inferior, respectively. If a result holds for both the limit
superior and the limit inferior but it is unclear whether the
limit exists, then we shall write d(Xℓk ). We shall follow this
notation throughout this document: an overline (·) indicates
that the quantity in the brackets has been computed using the
limit superior over m, an underline (·) indicates that it has
been computed using the limit inferior, both an overline and
an underline (·) indicates that a result holds irrespective of
whether the limit
superior or limit inferior over m is taken.
If H [Xℓk ]1 < ∞, then [1, Eq. 7], [4, Prop. 1]
0 ≤ d(Xℓk ) ≤ d(Xℓk ) ≤ k − ℓ + 1.
(4)
If H [Xℓk ]1 = ∞, then d(Xℓk ) = ∞. As shown in [9,
Lemma 3], information dimension is invariant under scaling
and translation, i.e., d(a · Xℓk ) = d(Xℓk ) and d(Xℓk + c) =
d(Xℓk ) for every a 6= 0 and c ∈ Rk−ℓ+1 .
III. I NFORMATION D IMENSION
OF U NIVARIATE P ROCESSES
In [7], [8], we generalized (3) by defining the information
dimension rate of a univariate stationary process {Xt } as
H [X1k ]m
H ′ ({[Xt ]m })
= lim lim
d({Xt }) , lim
m→∞ k→∞
m→∞
log m
k log m
(5)
provided the limit exists. (The limit over k exists by stationarity.)
If H ([X1 ]1 ) < ∞, then [8, Lemma 4]
0 ≤ d({Xt }) ≤ d({Xt }) ≤ 1;
(6)
if H ([X1 ]1 ) = ∞, then d({Xt }) = ∞. Moreover, the
information dimension rate of the process cannot exceed the
information dimension of the marginal RV, i.e.,
d({Xt }) ≤ d(X1 ).
(7)
Kawabata and Dembo [2, Lemma 3.2] showed that the
information dimension of a RV equals its rate-distortion dimension. By emulating the proof of [2, Lemma 3.2], we
generalized this result to stationary processes by demonstrating
that the information dimension rate is equal to the ratedistortion dimension. Specifically, let R(X1k , D) denote the
rate-distortion function of the k-dimensional source X1k , i.e.,
R(X1k , D) ,
inf
E[kX̂1k −X1k k2 ]≤D
I(X1k ; X̂1k )
(8)
where the infimum is over all conditional distributions of X̂1k
given X1k such that E[kX̂1k − X1k k2 ] ≤ D (where k · k denotes
the Euclidean norm). The rate-distortion dimension of the
stationary process {Xt } is defined as
R(X1k , kD)
D↓0 k→∞ −k log D
dimR ({Xt }) , 2 lim lim
(9)
provided the limit as D ↓ 0 exists. By stationarity, the limit
over k always exists [11, Th. 9.8.1]. We showed that [8, Th. 5]
dimR ({Xt }) = d({Xt }).
(10)
This result directly generalizes to non-stationary process (possibly with the limit over k replaced by the limit superior or
limit inferior).
IV. I NFORMATION D IMENSION
OF M ULTIVARIATE P ROCESSES
Now let z1k ∈ Zk . We have
In this section, we generalize the definition of the information dimension rate (5) to multivariate (real-valued) processes
and study its properties.
Definition 1 (Information Dimension Rate): The information
dimension rate of the L-variate, stationary process {X t } is
H ′ ({[X t ]m })
m→∞
log m
k
k
H [X1,1
]m , . . . , [XL,1
]m
= lim lim
m→∞ k→∞
k log m
H
k
[a1 X1,1
]m
k
[X1,1
]m
zk
= 1
m
!
zk 1
k
k
)
= H [a1 X1,1
]m X1,1
∈ C( m1 , m
k
k
= H ⌊a1 mX1,1
⌋ a1 mX1,1
∈ C(a1 z1k , a1 )
≤ k log (⌈a1 ⌉ + 1) .
d({X t }) , lim
(11)
provided the limit over m exists.
We next summarize some basic properties of the information
dimension rate.
Lemma 1 (Finiteness and Bounds): Let {X t } be a stationary, L-variate process. If H ([X 1 ]1 ) < ∞, then
0 ≤ d({X t }) ≤ d(X 1 ) ≤ L.
the chain rule, and the fact that conditioning reduced entropy,
we have
k
k
H [a1 X1,1
]m , [a2 X2,1
]m
k
k
k
k
≤ H [a1 X1,1
]m , [a2 X2,1
]m , [X1,1
]m , [X2,1
]m
k
k
= H [X1,1
]m , [X2,1
]m
k
k
k
k
+ H [a1 X1,1
]m , [a2 X2,1
]m [X1,1
]m , [X2,1
]m
k
k
k
k
]m
]m [X1,1
≤ H [X1,1
]m , [X2,1
]m + H [a1 X1,1
k
k
(14)
+ H [a2 X2,1
]m [X2,1
]m
(12)
If H ([X 1 ]1 ) = ∞, then d({X t }) = ∞.
Proof: Suppose first that H ([X 1 ]1 ) < ∞. Then, the
rightmost inequality in (12) follows from (4). The leftmost
inequality follows from the nonnegativity of entropy. Finally,
the center inequality follows since conditioning reduces entropy, hence H ′ ({[X t ]m }) ≤ H ([X 1 ]m ).
Now suppose that H ([X 1 ]1 ) = ∞. By stationarity and
since [X 1 ]1 is a function of [X k1 ]m for every m and every k,
we have
(13)
H ([X 1 ]1 ) ≤ H [X k1 ]m .
This implies that H ′ ({[X t ]m }) = ∞ and the claim
d({X t }) = ∞ follows from Definition 1.
It was shown in [9, Lemma 3] that information dimension
is invariant under scaling and translation. The same properties
hold for the information dimension rate.
Lemma 2 (Scale Invariance): Let {X t } be a stationary, Lvariate process and let ai > 0, i = 1, . . . , L. Further let Yi,t ,
ai Xi,t , i = 1, . . . , L, t ∈ Z. Then, d({Y t }) = d({X t }).
Proof: We show the proof for L = 2 by adapting the proof
of [4, Lemma 16]. The proof for higher-dimensional processes
follows along the same lines. By the data processing inequality,
(15)
where the last inequality follows because flooring numbers
from an interval of length a1 yields at most ⌈a1 ⌉ + 1 different
integers. Combining (15) with (14), dividing by k, and letting
k tend to infinity yields
H ′ ({[a1 X1,t ]m }, {[a2 X2,t ]m })
≤ H ′ ({[X1,t ]m }, {[X2,t ]m })
+ log(⌈a1 ⌉ + 1) + log(⌈a2 ⌉ + 1). (16)
Dividing by log m and letting m tend to infinity yields
d({Y t }) ≤ d({X t }). The reverse inequality is obtained by
noting that a11 a1 X1,t = X1,t , so the above steps with (a1 , a2 )
replaced by (1/a1 , 1/a2 ) yield
H ′ ({[a1 X1,t ]m }, {[a2 X2,t ]m })
≥ H ′ ({[X1,t ]m }, {[X2,t ]m })
− log(⌈1/a1 ⌉ + 1) − log(⌈1/a2 ⌉ + 1).
Thus, we obtain d({Y t }) ≥ d({X t }) by dividing by log m
and by letting m tend to infinity.
Lemma 3 (Translation Invariance): Let {X t } be a stationary, L-variate process and let {ct }, t ∈ Z be a sequence of
L-dimensional vectors. Then, d({X t + ct }) = d({X t }).
Proof: The lemma follows from [9, Lemma 30], which
states that
kL
X
log(1 + Ai + Bi )
|H U1kL − H V1kL | ≤
(17)
i=1
for any collection of integer-valued RVs U1kL and V1kL satisfying almost surely −Bi ≤ Ui − Vi ≤ Ai , i = 1, . . . , kL.
Applying this result with UℓL+j = ⌊mXℓ,j + mcℓ,j ⌋ and
VℓL+j = ⌊mXℓ,j ⌋ + ⌊mcℓ,j ⌋ gives the desired result. Indeed,
we have that −1 ≤ UℓL+j − VℓL+j ≤ 2, so (17) yields
(18)
H [X k1 ]m − H [X k1 + ck1 ]m ≤ kL log(4).
We thus obtain |d({X t }) − d({X t + ct })| = 0 by dividing
(18) by k log m and by letting k and m tend to infinity.
We finally observe that the information dimension rate of a
stationary stochastic process equals its rate-distortion dimension. This generalizes [8, Th. 5] to multivariate processes.
Theorem 1: Let {X t } be an L-variate stationary process.
Then,
d({X t }) = dimR {X t }
(19)
where dimR {X t } is defined as in (9) but with {Xt } replaced
by {X t }.
Proof: The proof is analog to that of [2, Lemma 3.2] and
[8, Th. 5].
√ We thus only provide a short sketch. We have with
m = 1/ D and from [8, Eq. (71) & (81)] that
!
∞
X
2
e−i
H [X k1 ]m − 2k 1 +
i=0
≤ R(X k1 , kLD) ≤ H [X k1 ]m . (20)
Dividing by k and taking the limit inferior and limit superior
as k → ∞, we get
!
∞
X
−i2
′
e
H ({[X t ]m }) − 2 1 +
i=0
R(X k1 , kLD)
≤ lim
k→∞
k
≤ H ′ ({[X t ]m })
(21)
(22)
and proves (19).
V. I NFORMATION D IMENSION
OF G AUSSIAN P ROCESSES
Let {X t } be a stationary, L-variate, real-valued Gaussian
process with mean vector µ and (matrix-valued) spectral
distribution function (SDF) θ 7→ FX (θ). Thus, FX is bounded,
non-decreasing, and right-continuous on [−1/2, 1/2], and it
satisfies [12, (7.3), p. 141]
Z 1/2
KX (τ ) =
e−ı2πτ θ dFX (θ), τ ∈ Z
(23)
−1/2
where KX (τ ) , E [(X t+τ − µ)(X t − µ)T ] denotes the autocovariance function. It can be shown that θ 7→ FX (θ)
has a derivative almost everywhere, which has positive semidefinite, Hermitian values [12, (7.4), p. 141]. We shall denote
′
the derivative of FX by FX
. Further note that the (i, j)-th
element of FX is the cross SDF θ 7→ FXi Xj of the component
processes {Xi,t } and {Xj,t }, i.e.,
Z 1/2
(24)
e−ı2πτ θ dFXi Xj (θ), τ ∈ Z
KXi Xj (τ ) =
−1/2
′
d({Xt }) = λ({θ: FX
(θ) > 0}).
(25)
This result can be directly generalized to the multivariate
case where the component processes are independent. Indeed,
suppose that {X t } is a collection of L independent Gaussian
processes {Xi,t , t ∈ Z} with SDFs FXi . This corresponds
to the case where the (matrix-valued) SDF is a diagonal
matrix with the SDFs of the individual processes on the main
diagonal. For independent processes, the joint entropy rate can
be written as the sum of the entropy rates of the component
processes. It follows that
d({X t }) =
L
X
i=1
d({Xi,t }) =
L
X
′
(θ) > 0}). (26)
λ({θ : FX
i
i=1
The expression on the right-hand side (RHS) of (26) can
alternatively be written as
Z 1/2
Z 1/2 X
L
′
′
(θ)
>
0}dθ
=
rank(FX
(θ))dθ (27)
1{FX
i
−1/2
−1/2 i=1
where the limit exists because {X t } is stationary. We now
divide the outer terms of this inequality by log m and the
inner term by − 21 log D, and take the limits as m → ∞ and
D ↓ 0, respectively. This yields
d({X t }) ≤ dimR {X t } ≤ d({X t })
where KXi Xj (τ ) , E [(Xi,t+τ − µi )(Xj,t − µj )] denotes the
cross-covariance function.
For univariate stationary Gaussian processes with SDF FX ,
we have shown that the information dimension rate is equal to
the Lebesgue measure of the set of harmonics on [−1/2, 1/2]
where the derivative of FX is is positive [8, Th. 7], i.e.,
where 1{·} is the indicator function. Observe that it is immaterial at which frequencies the component processes contain
signal power. For example, the information dimension rate
of two independent Gaussian processes with bandwidth 1/4
equals 1 regardless of where the derivatives of their SDFs have
their support. The following theorem shows that this result
continuous to hold for general L-variate Gaussian processes.
Theorem 2: Let {X t } be a stationary, L-variate Gaussian
process with mean vector µ and SDF FX . Then,
Z 1/2
′
rank(FX
(θ))dθ.
(28)
d({X t }) =
−1/2
Proof: See Appendix A.
An important ingredient in the proof is the following
generalization of [8, Lemma 6].
Lemma 4: Let {X t } be an L-variate, stationary Gaussian
process with mean vector µ and SDF FX (θ). Then, the (i, j)th entry of the SDF θ 7→ F[X]m (θ) of {[X t ]m }, i.e., the
satisfies for i, j = 1, . . . , L,
F[Xi ]m [Xj ]m (θ) = (ai + aj − 1)FXi Xj (θ) + FNi Nj (θ) (29)
where Ni,t , Xi,t − [Xi,t ]m and where
ai ,
1
E [(Xj,t − µj )([Xi,t ]m − E [[Xi,t ]m ])] .
σi2
(30)
For every i = 1, . . . , L, we have
1
|1 − ai | ≤
m
s
2
πσi2
(31)
and
Z
1/2
1
dFNi (θ) ≤ 2 .
m
−1/2
(32)
Moreover, if all component processes have unit variance, then
a1 = . . . = aL and hence
F[X]m (θ) = (2a1 − 1)FX (θ) + FN (θ).
(33)
Proof: Let Zi,t , [Xi,t ]m . For every pair i, j = 1, . . . , L,
we have with [8, (83)]
KNi Nj (τ ) =KXi Xj (τ ) + KZi Zj (τ )
− KXi Zj (τ ) − KZi Xj (τ ).
(34)
From Bussgang’s theorem [13, eq. (19)] we have that
KXi Zj (τ ) = KZj Xi (−τ ) = aj KXi Xj (τ ). This implies that
KNi Nj (τ ) = KXi Xj (τ ) + KZi Zj (τ )
− aj KXi Xj (τ ) − ai KXj Xi (−τ )
= (1 − aj − ai )KXi Xj (τ ) + KZi Zj (τ ).
(35)
Since the SDM is fully determined by the covariance structure
of a process, we obtain (29). Equations (31) and (32) follow
immediately from equations (35) and (36) in [8, Lemma 6].
VI. I NFORMATION D IMENSION
OF C OMPLEX G AUSSIAN P ROCESSES
Theorem 2 allows us to study the information dimension
of stationary, univariate, complex-valued Gaussian processes
by treating them as bivariate, real-valued processes. Let {Zt }
be a stationary, univariate, complex-valued, Gaussian process
with mean µ and SDF FZ , i.e.,
Z 1/2
KZ (τ ) =
e−ı2πτ θ dFZ (θ), τ ∈ Z
(36)
−1/2
where KZ (τ ) , E [(Zt+τ − µ)(Zt − µ)∗ ] is the autocovariance function.
Alternatively, {Zt } can be expressed in terms of its real
and imaginary part. Indeed, let Zt = Rt + ıIt , t ∈ Z. The
stationary, bivariate, real-valued process {(Rt , It ), t ∈ Z} is
jointly Gaussian and has SDF
FR (θ) FRI (θ)
F(R,I) (θ) =
, −1/2 ≤ θ ≤ 1/2
FIR (θ) FI (θ)
(37)
where FR and FI are the SDFs of {Rt } and {It }, respectively,
and FRI and FIR are the cross SDFs between {Rt } and {It }.
The derivatives of FZ and F(R,I) are connected as follows:
′
′
FZ′ (θ) = FR′ (θ) + FI′ (θ) + ı FIR
(θ) − FRI
(θ)
′
= FR′ (θ) + FI′ (θ) + 2Im FRI
(θ)
(38)
′
where the last equality follows because F(R,I)
is Hermitian.
′
It can be further shown that θ 7→ FR (θ) and θ 7→ FI′ (θ) are
′
real-valued and symmetric, and that θ 7→ Im FRI
(θ) is antisymmetric.
A stationary, complex-valued process {Zt } is said to be
proper if its mean µ and its pseudo-autocovariance function
KZ (τ ) , E [(Zt+τ − µ)(Zt − µ)] ,
τ ∈Z
are both zero [14, Def. 17.5.4]. Since, by Lemma 3, the
information dimension rate is independent of µ, we shall
slightly abuse notation and say that a stationary, complexvalued process is proper if its pseudo-autocovariance function
is identically zero, irrespective of its mean. Properness implies
that, for all θ, FR (θ) = FI (θ) and FRI (θ) = −FIR (θ).
′
Since θ 7→ F(R,I)
(θ) is Hermitian, this implies that for a
proper process the derivative of the cross SDF FRI is purely
imaginary.
The following corollary to Theorem 2 shows that proper
Gaussian processes maximize information dimension. This
parallels the result that proper Gaussian vectors maximize
differential entropy [15, Th. 2].
Corollary 1: Let {Zt } be a stationary, complex-valued
Gaussian process with mean µ and SDF FZ . Then
d({Zt }) ≤ 2 · λ({θ: FZ′ (θ) > 0})
with equality if {Zt } is proper.
Proof: We know from Theorem 2 that
Z 1/2
′
(θ))dθ.
d({Zt }) =
rank(F(R,I)
(39)
(40)
−1/2
′
For a given θ, the eigenvalues of F(R,I)
(θ) are given by
r
(FR′ (θ) − FI′ (θ))2
FR′ (θ) + FI′ (θ)
′ (θ)|2 . (41)
±
+ |FRI
2
4
′
Since F(R,I)
(θ) is positive semi-definite, these eigenvalues are
nonnegative and
′
FR′ (θ)FI′ (θ) ≥ |FRI
(θ)|2 .
(42)
In particular, the larger of these eigenvalues, say µ1 (θ), is zero
on
F1 , {θ : FR′ (θ) = FI′ (θ) = 0}.
(43)
The smaller eigenvalue, µ2 (θ), is zero on
′
F2 , θ : FR′ (θ)FI′ (θ) = |FRI
(θ)|2 .
(44)
Clearly, F1 ⊆ F2 . By (40), we have that
d({Zt }) = λ({θ: µ1 (θ) > 0}) + λ({θ: µ2 (θ) > 0})
= 1 − λ(F1 ) + 1 − λ(F1 ) − λ(F1c ∩ F2 ).
(45)
We next note that, by (38) and (42), the derivative FZ′ (θ)
is zero if either FR′ (θ) = FI′ (θ) = 0 or if FR′ (θ) + FI′ (θ) > 0
′
and FR′ (θ) + FI′ (θ) = −2Im(FRI
(θ)). Since θ 7→ FR′ (θ)
′
′
and θ 7→ FI (θ) are symmetric and θ 7→ Im(FRI
) is antic
symmetric, it follows that for any θ ∈ F1 satisfying FR′ (θ) +
′
FI′ (θ) = −2Im(FRI
(θ)) we have that FR′ (−θ) + FI′ (−θ) =
′
2Im(FRI (−θ)). Thus, defining
′
F3 , θ : FR′ (θ) + FI′ (θ) = 2|Im(FRI
(θ))|
(46)
we can express the Lebesgue measure of the set of harmonics
where FZ′ (θ) = 0 as
1
λ({θ: FZ′ (θ) = 0}) = λ(F1 ) + λ(F1c ∩ F3 ).
2
(47)
Combining (45) and (47), we obtain
d({Zt }) = 2λ({θ : FZ′ (θ) > 0}) + λ(F1c ∩ F3 ) − λ(F1c ∩ F2 ).
(48)
Since the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the
geometric mean, and using (42), we have that
(FR′ (θ) + FI′ (θ))2 ≥ 4FR′ (θ)FI′ (θ)
′
′
≥ 4|FRI
(θ)|2 ≥ 4Im(FRI
(θ))2 . (49)
Hence, F3 ⊆ F2 which implies that the difference of the last
two Lebesgue measures on the RHS of (48) is less than or
equal to zero. This proves (39).
If {Zt } is proper, then we have FR′ (θ) = FI′ (θ)
′
′
and |FRI
(θ)| = |Im(FRI
(θ))| for almost all θ. In this
′
′
′
case, FR (θ)FI (θ) = |FRI (θ)|2 implies FR′ (θ) + FI′ (θ) =
′
2|Im(FRI
(θ))|, so F2 ⊆ F3 . It follows that F2 = F3 and
the difference of the last two Lebesgue measures on the RHS
of (48) is zero. Hence, (39) holds with equality.
Remark 1: There are also non-proper processes for which
(39) holds with equality. For example, this is the case for
any stationary Gaussian process for which real and imaginary
′
parts are independent, i.e., FRI
(θ) = 0, and FR′ and FI′ have
matching support but are different otherwise.
VII. C ONCLUSION
We proposed a generalization of information dimension to
multivariate, stationary processes. Specifically, if {X t } is an
L-variate, stationary process, then we defined its information
dimension rate d({X t }) as the entropy rate H ′ ([X t ]m ) divided by log m in the limit as m → ∞. We demonstrated that
the information dimension rate is bounded if [X 1 ]1 has finite
entropy and that it is invariant under scaling and translation.
We furthermore showed that d({X t }) coincides with the ratedistortion dimension, thus generalizing our result for univariate
processes [8, Th. 5].
Our main result concerns the information dimension rate of
L-variate, stationary, Gaussian processes with (matrix-valued)
spectral distribution function FX . We showed that in this
case d({X t }) equals the Lebesgue integral of the rank of the
derivative of FX , i.e.,
Z 1/2
′
rank(FX
(θ))dθ.
(50)
d({X t }) =
−1/2
As a corollary, we showed that the information dimension
rate of a univariate complex-valued Gaussian process {Xt } is
upper-bounded by twice the Lebesgue measure of the support
of the derivative of its spectral distribution function FX . This
upper bound is achieved if, but not only if, the Gaussian
process is proper.
P ROOF
A PPENDIX A
OF THE M AIN R ESULT
The proof follows along the lines of [8, Th. 7]. We adopt
the following notation. For every i, we define Ni,t , Xi,t −
[Xi,t ]m . Let Ui,t be i.i.d. (over all i and t) and uniformly
distributed on [0, 1/m), and let Wi,t , [Xi,t ]m + Ui,t . We define {[X t ]m }, {N t }, and {U t } as corresponding multivariate
processes. Since {Ui,t } is independent of {[Xj,t ]m } for every
i, j, the (matrix-valued) SDFs of {W t }, {[X t ]m }, and {U t }
satisfy
FW (θ) = F[X]m (θ) + FU (θ),
−1/2 ≤ θ ≤ 1/2.
(51)
Moreover, the (matrix-valued) power spectral density (PSD) of
1
{U t } exists and equals SU (θ) = 12m
2 IL , where IL denotes
the L × L identity matrix.
We next note that since the information dimension rate is
translation invariant (Lemma 3) and since the SDF FX does
not depend on the mean vector µ, we can assume without
loss of generality that {X t } has zero mean. We moreover
show in Lemma 5 in Appendix B that we can assume,
without loss of generality, that every component process of
{X t } has unit variance. Indeed, if all component processes
have positive variance, then this follows immediately from
Lemma 2. Lemma 5 expands upon Lemma 2 in that it shows
that 1) normalizing component processes to unit variance does
not affect the rank of FX and 2) component processes with
zero variance need not be considered in computing d({X t })
or the rank of FX .
With this assumption and the notation introduced above, we
write the entropy of [X k1 ]m in terms of a differential entropy,
i.e.,
(52)
H [X k1 ]m = h W k1 + kL log m.
Denoting by (W k1 )G a Gaussian vector with the same mean
and covariance matrix as W k1 , and denoting by fW k1 and gW k1
the probability density functions (pdfs) of W k1 and (W k1 )G ,
respectively, this can be expressed as
H([X k1 ]m ) = h (W k1 )G + D(fW k1 kgW k1 ) + kL log m.
(53)
Dividing by k log m and letting first k and then m tend
to infinity yields the information dimension rate d({X t }).
Lemma 6 in Appendix B shows that
D(fW k1 kgW k1 ) ≤ kK
(54)
for some constant K that is independent of (k, m). Moreover,
the differential entropy rate of the stationary, L-variate Gaussian process {W t } is given by [12, Th. 7.10]
h (W k1 )G
lim
k→∞
k
Z
1 1/2
L
′
= log(2πe) +
log detFW
(θ)dθ. (55)
2
2 −1/2
It thus follows that the information dimension rate of {X t }
equals
Z 1/2
1
′
d({X t }) = L + lim
log detFW
(θ)dθ. (56)
m→∞ 2 log m −1/2
where the last step is due to (32) in Lemma 4. Since, by (31)
in the same lemma, a1 → 1 with m → ∞, we have
Z
′
log detFW
(θ)dθ ≤ −Lλ(FΥ ) log (λ(FΥ )) (63)
lim
It remains to show that the RHS of (56) is equal to the RHS
of (28). To do so, we first show that the integral on the RHS
c
of (56) can be restricted to a subset FΥ
⊆ [−1/2, 1/2] on
′
which the entries of FN (θ) are bounded from above by Υ/m2
′
for some Υ > 0. We then show that, on this set, detFW
(θ)
can be bounded from above and from below by products of
′
affine transforms of the eigenvalues of FX
(θ). These bounds
are asymptotically tight, i.e., they are equal in the limit as m
tends to infinity. We complete the proof by showing that the
order of limit and integration can be exchanged.
where lim denotes the limit superior. As a consequence, we
have
R
′
log detFW
(θ)dθ
2L2
≤ lim FΥ
−
Υ
log m
m→∞
R
′
log detFW
(θ)dθ
≤ 0 (64)
≤ lim FΥ
m→∞
log m
c
A. Restriction on FΥ
⊆ [−1/2, 1/2]
Choose Υ > 0 and let
FΥ , {θ :
max FN′ i (θ) > Υ/m2 }.
i=1,...,L
We have from [8, (106)-(108)] that, for every i,
1
Υ
≤ .
λ
θ: FN′ i (θ) > 2
m
Υ
(57)
(58)
(59)
and since derivatives of matrix-valued SDFs are positive
semidefinite, we have
′
detFW
(θ) ≥ detSU (θ) = 1/(12m2)L .
(60)
Hence,
R
FΥ
lim
m→∞
′
log detFW
(θ)dθ
log m
≥ −λ(FΥ ) lim
m→∞
FΥ
for every Υ. It follows that this integral does not contribute to
the information dimension rate if we let Υ tend to infinity. It
thus suffices to evaluate the limit of
Z
1
′
log detFW
(θ)dθ.
(65)
L+
2 log m FΥc
′
′
B. Bounding detFW
(θ) by the Eigenvalues of FX
(θ)
Lemma 4 and (59) yield
The set FΥ is the union of L such events, from which
L
λ(FΥ ) ≤ Υ
follows from the union bound. Since
′
′
(θ) + SU (θ)
FW
(θ) = F[X]
m
m→∞
2L log(12m)
log m
2L2
(61)
Υ
where lim denotes the limit inferior. Here, the last step follows
L
because λ(FΥ ) ≤ Υ
. Applying Hadamard’s and Jensen’s
inequality we further get
Z
′
log detFW
(θ)dθ
≥−
1
IL .
(66)
12m2
′
Let µi (θ), i = 1, . . . , L, denote the eigenvalues of FX
(θ).
′
Sine FN (θ) is positive semidefinite, we obtain
1
′
′
detFW (θ) ≥ det (2a1 − 1)FX (θ) +
I
12m2
L
Y
1
(2a1 − 1)µi (θ) +
=
. (67)
12m2
i=1
P
Now let A be an n × n matrix and let kAk , ni,j=1 |ai,j |
′
denote the ℓ1 -matrix norm of A. Since FN
(θ) is positive
semidefinite, the element with the maximum modulus is on
the main diagonal; cf. [16, Problem 7.1.P1]. Furthermore, by
c
assumption, on FΥ
the diagonal elements are bounded from
Υ
′
(θ)k ≤ L2 Υ/m2 ,
above by m2 . We hence obtain kFN
ηmax (θ). It is known that all matrix norms1 bound the largest
eigenvalue of the matrix from above [16, Th. 5.6.9]. Thus,
ηmax (θ) is also an upper bound on the largest eigenvalue
′
(θ). Let ωi (θ), i = 1 . . . , L, denote the eigenvalues
of FN
′
of FW (θ). Then we have for m sufficiently large such that
2a1 − 1 ≥ 0 [16, Cor. 4.3.15]
′
′
′
FW
(θ) = (2a1 − 1)FX
(θ) + FN
(θ) +
FΥ
≤
≤
L Z
X
i=1
L
X
i=1
L
X
FΥ
′
detFW
(θ) =
′
(θ)dθ
log FW
i
R
F ′ (θ)dθ
FΥ Wi
λ(FΥ ) log
λ(FΥ )
!
1
(2a1 − 1) + 12m
2 + KNi (0)
λ(FΥ ) log
=
λ(FΥ )
i=1
1
1
(2a1 − 1) + 12m
2 + m2
= Lλ(FΥ ) log
(62)
λ(FΥ )
≤
≤
L
Y
ωi (θ)
i=1
L
Y
i=1
L
Y
i=1
1
12m2
+ L2 Υ
.
(68)
m2
(2a1 − 1)µi (θ) + ηmax (θ) +
(2a1 − 1)µi (θ) +
1
12
1 This bound holds without a multiplicative constant, since the spectral
radius of a matrix is the infimum of all matrix norms [16, Lemma 5.6.10].
Combining (67) and (68) with (65), we obtain
R
1
L
dθ
X
c log (2a1 − 1)µi (θ) + 12m2
FΥ
lim
m→∞
log m
i=1
R
′
c log detFW (θ)dθ
FΥ
≤ lim
log m
m→∞
R
′
log
detFW
(θ)dθ
c
FΥ
≤ lim
m→∞
log m
1
R
+L2 Υ
L
(2a1 − 1)µi (θ) + 12 m2
dθ
X
c log
FΥ
≤ lim
.
m→∞
log m
i=1
(69)
It thus remains to evaluate
Z
L
X
log (2a1 − 1)µi (θ) +
lim
L−
m→∞ F c
log(1/m2 )
Υ
i=1
K
m2
dθ
(70)
where K is either 1/12 or 1/12 + L2 Υ.
result we also have 2a1 − 1 ≤ 2, m2 > 8/π, it follows that,
for m ≥ m0 ,
log 2 µiK(θ) + m12
log Am (θ) + m12
≤
≤ 0. (74)
log(1/m2 )
log(1/m2 )
The LHS of (74) is nonpositive and monotonically increases to
zero as m → ∞. We can thus apply the monotone convergence
theorem to get
Z
log Am (θ) + m12
0 ≥ lim
dθ
m→∞ F
log(1/m2 )
II
Z
log Am (θ) + m12
≥ lim
dθ
log(1/m2 )
m→∞ FII
Z
log 2 µiK(θ) + m12
≥ lim
dθ
m→∞ F
log(1/m2 )
II
Z
log 2 µiK(θ) + m12
lim
=
dθ
log(1/m2 )
FII m→∞
= 0.
(75)
C. Exchanging Limit and Integration
To evaluate (70), we continue along the lines of [17,
Sec. VIII]. Specifically, for each i, we split the integral on
the RHS of (70) into three parts:
c
FI , {θ ∈ FΥ
: µi (θ) = 0}
FII , {θ ∈
FIII , {θ ∈
c
FΥ
:
c
FΥ :
µi (θ) ≥ K/(1 − ε)}
0 < µi (θ) < K/(1 − ε)}
where 0 < ε ≪ 1 is arbitrary.
For the first part, we obtain
Z
log (2a1 − 1)µi (θ) + mK2
dθ
log(1/m2 )
FI
Z
log K + log(1/m2 )
dθ
=
log(1/m2 )
FI
log K
= λ(FI ) 1 +
log(1/m2 )
(71a)
(71b)
(71c)
(72)
which evaluates to λ(FI ) in the limit as m → ∞.
We next show that the integrals over FII and FIII do
not contribute to (70). To this end, it suffices to consider the
integral of the function
log (2a1 − 1) µiK(θ) + m12
log Am (θ) + m12
,
. (73)
log(1/m2 )
log(1/m2 )
In the remainder of the proof, we shall assume without loss
of generality that m2 > 8/π, in which case Am (θ) > 0 on
θ ∈ FII ∪FIII . Clearly, whenever Am (θ) > 0, the function in
(73) converges to zero as m → ∞. Moreover, for Am (θ) ≥ 1,
this function is nonpositive.
For all θ ∈ FII we have Am (θ) ≥ (2a1 − 1)/(1 − ε),
hence we can find a sufficiently large m0 such that, by (31) in
Lemma 4, we have Am (θ) ≥ 1, m ≥ m0 . Since by the same
We next turn to the case θ ∈ FIII . It was shown in [17,
p. 443] that if Am (θ) < 1, then the function in (73) is bounded
from above by 1. Furthermore, if Am (θ) < 1 − m12 then it is
nonnegative, and if Am (θ) ≥ 1 − m12 then it is nonpositive
and monotonically increasing in m. Restricting ourselves to
the case m2 > 8/π, we thus obtain for θ ∈ FIII
( log( 2 + π )
1−ε
8
π
log Am (θ) + m12
log(π/8) , Am (θ) ≥ 1 − 8
≥
log(1/m2 )
0,
otherwise
(76)
where we made use of the fact that Am (θ) < (2a1 −1)/(1−ε),
θ ∈ FIII and, by (31) in Lemma 4, 2a1 − 1 ≤ 2, m2 >
8/π. Hence, on FIII the magnitude of the function in (73) is
bounded by
π
2
1
+
log
log Am (θ) + m2
1−ε
8
≤ max 1,
. (77)
2
log(1/m )
log(8/π)
We can thus apply the dominated convergence theorem to get
Z
log (2a1 − 1)µi (θ) + mK2
lim
dθ
m→∞ F
log(1/m2 )
III
Z
log (2a1 − 1) µiK(θ) + m12
lim
=
dθ = 0. (78)
log(1/m2 )
FIII m→∞
Combining (72), (75), and (78), we have that
Z
1
′
log detFW
(θ)dθ
L + lim
m→∞ 2 log m F c
Υ
=
L
X
i=1
=
L
X
i=1
c
(1 − λ({θ ∈ FΥ
: µi (θ) = 0}))
c
λ({θ ∈ FΥ
: µi (θ) > 0}).
(79)
By
PL the continuity of the Lebesgue measure, this tends to
i=1 λ({θ: µi (θ) > 0}) as Υ tends to infinity. But since the
rank of a matrix is exactly the number of non-zero eigenvalues
we obtain
Z 1/2
L
X
′
λ({θ: µi (θ) > 0}) =
rank(FX
(θ))dθ.
(80)
−1/2
i=1
To summarize, combining (56), (64), (78), and (79), we obtain
that
Z 1/2
1
′
d({X t }) = L + lim lim
log detFW
(θ)dθ
Υ→∞ m→∞ 2 log m −1/2
Z 1/2
′
=
rank(FX
(θ))dθ.
(81)
−1/2
This completes the proof.
A PPENDIX B
AUXILIARY R ESULTS
+
i=L′ +1
|
H
k
k
k
[Xi,1
]m |[X1,1
]m , . . . , [Xi−1,1
]m
{z
=0
Proof: By [14, Th. 23.6.14], the vector X
(X1 , . . . , Xℓ )T can be written as
X = AN + µ
=
(85)
′
where N is a ℓ -dimensional, zero-mean, Gaussian vector
(ℓ′ ≤ ℓ) with independent components whose variances are
the nonzero eigenvalues of CX and where A is a ℓ × ℓ′ matrix
satisfying AT A = I (with I denoting the identity matrix). We
use the data processing inequality, the chain rule for relative
entropy, and the fact that N is Gaussian to obtain
D(fW kgW ) ≤ D(fW ,N kgW ,N )
In this section, we show that in the statement and proof
of Theorem 2 we may assume without loss of generality
that every component process has zero mean and unit variance. Moreover, we present the multivariate counterpart of [8,
Lemma 6].
Lemma 5: Suppose that {X t } is a stationary, L-variate
Gaussian process with mean vector µ and SDF FX . Suppose
that the component processes are ordered by their variances,
2
2
2
′
i.e., ∞ > σ12 ≥ σ22 ≥ · · · σL
′ ≥ σL′ +1 = · · · σL = 0 (L ≤ L).
Then, d({X t }) = d({ σ11 X1,t , . . . , σ1 ′ XL′ ,t }) and, for almost
L
′
′
every θ, rank(FX
(θ)) = rank(F(X
(θ)).
1 /σ1 ,...,XL′ /σL′ )
Proof: Normalizing component processes with positive
variance to unit variance does not affect the information
dimension rate, as follows from Lemma 2. If σi2 = 0, then
the component process {Xi,t } is almost surely constant. It
k
follows that H [Xi,1
]m = 0 for every m and every k, and
hence, by the chain rule,
k
H [X k1 ]m = H [X1,1
]m , . . . , [XLk ′ ,1 ]m
L
X
where U is a ℓ-variate vector, independent of X, with components independently and uniformly distributed on [0, 1/m).
Then,
D(fW kgW )
75 24
1
1
+
≤ log 2π 1 +
+ . (84)
ℓ
2
12
2
π
. (82)
}
Dividing by k log m and letting m and k tend to zero shows
that d({X t }) = d({ σ11 X1,t , . . . , σ1 ′ XL′ ,t }).
L
Let Π be an L′ × L′ diagonal matrix with values σi on the
main diagonal. For component processes with zero variance,
′
the corresponding row and column of FX
(θ) is zero almost
everywhere. Hence, we have for almost every θ that
′
ΠF(X
(θ)Π 0
′
1 /σ1 ,...,XL′ /σL′ )
FX
(θ) =
(83)
0
0
where 0 denotes an all-zero matrix of appropriate size. We
′
′
thus have rank(FX
(θ)) = rank(F(X
(θ)) for
1 /σ1 ,...,XL′ /σL′ )
almost every θ.
Lemma 6: Let X be an ℓ-variate Gaussian vector with mean
vector µ and covariance matrix CX . Let W , [X]m + U ,
≤ D(fN kgN )
Z
+ D(fW |N =n kgW |N =n )fN (n)dn
Z
= D(fW |N =n kgW |N =n )fN (n)dn (86)
where gW ,N denotes the PDF of a Gaussian vector with the
same mean vector and covariance matrix as (W , N ), and
fW ,N (w, n)
gN (n)
gW ,N (w, n)
gW |N =n (w) ,
.
gN (n)
fW |N =n (w) ,
(87a)
(87b)
To evaluate the relative entropy on the RHS of (86), we
first note that, given X, the random vector W is uniformly
1
. Since X
distributed on an ℓ-dimensional cube of length m
can be obtained from N via (85), the conditional PDF of W
given N = n is
fW |N =n (w) = mℓ 1{[w]m = [An + µ]m },
w ∈ Rℓ . (88)
Consequently, denoting z = [An + µ]m ,
q
D(fW |N =n kgW |N =n ) = log mℓ (2π)ℓ detCW |N
Z
mℓ
−1
+
(w − µW |N =n )T CW
|N (w − µW |N =n )dw
2 C(z,1/m)
(89)
where µW |N =n and CW |N denote the conditional mean and
the conditional covariance matrix of W given N = n. These
can be computed as [14, Th. 23.7.4]
−1
µW |N =n = E [W ] + CW N CN
n
CW |N = CW −
−1 T
CW N CN
CW N
(90a)
(90b)
where CW N denotes the cross-covariance matrix of W and
N , and CW and CN denote the covariance matrices of W
and N , respectively.
Letting Z = [X]m , we have W = Z + U . Since U is
independent of X, the cross-covariance matrix of W and X
(denoted by CW X ) is equal to the cross-covariance matrix
of Z and X (denoted by CZX ). Bussgang’s theorem [13,
eq. (19)] yields KZj Xi (τ ) = aj KXj Xi (τ ) where aj is as
in Lemma 4. Hence, if Λa is a diagonal matrix with the
elements of a = (a1 , . . . , aℓ ) on the main diagonal, then
CZX = Λa CX . From (85) we get CX = ACN AT and
CW N = CW X A, hence
CW N = CW X A = CZX A = Λa CX A = Λa ACN .
(91)
Together with (90), this yields
µW |N =n = E [W ] + Λa An
CW |N = CW − Λa CX Λa .
(92a)
(92b)
Combining (92a) with (85), and using the triangle inequality, we upper-bound each component of w − µW |N =n as
|wj − E [Wj ] − aj (xj − µj )| ≤ |zj − xj | + |uj − E [Uj ]|
+ |E [Zj ] − µj | + |1 − aj ||xj − µj |. (93)
The first and the third term on the RHS of (93) are both upper1
1
bounded by m
, and the second term is upper-bounded by 2m
.
From (31) in Lemma
4
we
get
that
the
term
|1
−
a
|
is
upper
j
q
bounded by 1/m 2/πσj2 , where σj2 is the variance of Xj .
We thus obtain
ℓ
2
X
(xj − µj )
4
25k
1
+
.
kw − µW |N =n k2 ≤ 2
m
2
π j=1
σj2
(94)
We next note that, since W = Z + U and since U is
independent from Z and i.i.d. on [0, 1/m),
CW |N = CZ − Λa CX Λa +
1
I.
12m2
(95)
It can be shown that CZ − Λa CX Λa is the conditional covariance matrix of Z given N , hence it is positive semidefinite.2
It follows that the smallest eigenvalue of CW |N is lower1
bounded by 12m
2 . Together with (94), this yields for the
second term on the RHS of (89)
mℓ
2
Z
−1
(w − µW |N =n )T CW
|N (w − µW |N =n )dw
ℓ
2
X
(x
−
µ
)
1
25ℓ
4
1
j
j
+
≤ 6mℓ+2 ℓ 2
m m
2
π j=1
σj2
C(z,1/m)
ℓ
=
75ℓ 24 X (xj − µj )2
.
+
2
π j=1
σj2
(96)
2 Indeed, we have C
ZX = CW X and, by (85), CZN = CZX A.
Replacing in (90b) W by Z, and repeating the steps leading to (92b), we
obtain the desired result.
To upper-bound the first term on the RHS of (89), we use
that (95) combined with Lemma 4 implies that every diagonal
element of CW |N is given by
1
E (Zj − E [Zj ])2 − a2j σj2 +
= −(1 − aj )2 σj2
12m2
1
. (97)
+ E (Xj − µj − Zj + E [Zj ])2 +
12m2
The first term on the RHS of (97)
is negative
and the
second term is upper-bounded by E (Xj − Zj )2 ≤ 1/m2 .
Hence, every element on the main diagonal of CW |N is
upper-bounded by 1+1/12
m2 . It thus follows from Hadamard’s
inequality that
q
ℓ
1
ℓ
ℓ
.
log m (2π) detCW |N ≤ log 2π 1 +
2
12
(98)
Combining (96) and (98) with (89) and (86) yields
D(fW ℓ1 kgW ℓ1 )
ℓ
75ℓ 24 X E (Xj − µj )2
1
ℓ
+
+
≤ log 2π 1 +
2
12
2
π j=1
σj2
1
75 24
1
=ℓ
+
.
(99)
log 2π 1 +
+
2
12
2
π
This completes the proof.
R EFERENCES
[1] A. Rényi, “On the dimension and entropy of probability distributions,”
Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 193–215, Mar. 1959.
[2] T. Kawabata and A. Dembo, “The rate-distortion dimension of sets and
measures,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1564–1572, Sep.
1994.
[3] T. Koch, “The Shannon lower bound is asymptotically tight,” IEEE
Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 6155–6161, Nov. 2016.
[4] Y. Wu and S. Verdú, “Rényi information dimension: Fundamental limits
of almost lossless analog compression,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 56,
no. 8, pp. 3721–3748, Aug. 2010.
[5] Y. Wu, S. Shamai (Shitz), and S. Verdú, “Information dimension and
the degrees of freedom of the interference channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf.
Theory, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 256–279, Jan. 2015.
[6] D. Stotz and H. Bölcskei, “Degrees of freedom in vector interference
channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 4172–4197, Jul.
2016.
[7] B. C. Geiger and T. Koch, “On the information dimension rate of
stochastic processes,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT),
Aachen, Germany, Jun. 2017, pp. 888–892.
[8] ——, “On the information dimension of stochastic processes,”
arXiv:1702.00645v2 [cs.IT], Feb. 2017.
[9] Y. Wu, “Shannon theory for compressed sensing,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Princeton University, 2011.
[10] T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 1st ed.
Wiley Interscience, 1991.
[11] R. G. Gallager, Information Theory and Reliable Communication. John
Wiley & Sons, 1968.
[12] N. Wiener and P. Masani, “The prediction theory of multivariate stochastic processes,” Acta Mathematica, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 111–150, 1957.
[13] J. J. Bussgang, “Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted Gaussian signals,” Res. Lab. of Electronics, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass., Tech.
Rep. 216, Mar. 1952.
[14] A. Lapidoth, A Foundation in Digital Communication. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[15] F. D. Neeser and J. L. Massey, “Proper complex random processes with
applications to information theory,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 39,
no. 4, pp. 1293–1302, Jul. 1993.
[16] R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, 2nd ed. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[17] A. Lapidoth, “On the asymptotic capacity of stationary Gaussian fading
channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 437–446, Feb.
2005.
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv:1501.00954v2 [math.AG] 14 Jan 2017
ON THE FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN
ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
JOSEPH LIPMAN AND AMNON NEEMAN
Abstract. Let f : X → Z be a separated essentially-finite-type flat
map of noetherian schemes, and δ : X → X ×Z X the diagonal map. The
fundamental class Cf (globalizing residues) is a map from the relative
Hochschild functor Lδ ∗δ∗ f ∗ to the relative dualizing functor f !. A compatibility between this Cf and derived tensor product is shown. The
main result is that, in a suitable sense, Cf generalizes Verdier’s classical
isomorphism for smooth f with fibers of dimension d, an isomorphism
that binds f ! to relative d-forms.
Introduction
1.1. (Underlying duality theory.) For a scheme X, D(X) is the derived
category of the abelian category of OX -modules; and Dqc (X) ⊂ D(X)
(resp. D+qc (X) ⊂ D(X)) is the full subcategory spanned by the complexes C
such that the cohomology modules H i (C) are all quasi-coherent (resp. are
all quasi-coherent, and vanish for all but finitely many i < 0).
Grothendieck duality is concerned with a pseudofunctor (−)! over the
category E of essentially-finite-type separated maps of noetherian schemes,
taking values in D+qc (−). This pseudofunctor is uniquely determined up to
isomorphism by the following three properties:
(i) For formally étale E-maps f , f ! is the usual restriction functor f ∗.
(ii) (Duality) If f is a proper map of noetherian schemes then f ! is rightadjoint to Rf∗ .
(iii) Suppose there is given a fiber square in E
v
(1.1.1)
X ′ −−−−→
gy
♣
X
f
y
Z ′ −−−−→ Z
u
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 14F05, 14F10. Secondary: 13D03.
Key words and phrases. Grothendieck duality, relative dualizing complex, fundamental
class.
This article is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under
Grant No. 0932078000, while the authors were in residence, during the Spring semester
of 2013, at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley, California.
1
2
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
with f (hence g) proper and u (hence v) formally étale. Then the functorial
base-change map
(1.1.2)
β♣ (F ) : : v ∗f !F → g!u∗F
F ∈ D+qc (Z) ,
defined to be adjoint to the natural composition
∼
Rg∗ v ∗f !F −→
u∗ Rf∗ f !F −→ u∗F
(see (2.6.7) below), is identical with the natural composite isomorphism
(1.1.3)
∼
∼
v ∗f !F = v !f !F −→
(f v)!F = (ug)!F −→
g!u!F = g !u∗ F.
(N.B. The composite isomorphism (1.1.3) exists for any E-maps f, g, u, v
with u and v étale and f v = ug.)
The case of finite-type maps is treated in [L09, Theorem 4.8.1], from
the category-theoretic viewpoint of Verdier and Deligne.1 An extension to
essentially-finite-type maps is given in [Nk09, §5.2]. The pseudofunctor (−)!
expands so as to take values in Dqc (−) if one restricts to proper maps or to
E-maps of finite flat dimension [AJL11, §§5.7–5.9]—and even without such
restrictions if one changes ‘pseudofunctor’ to ‘oplax functor,’ i.e., one allows
g
f
that for an E-diagram W −→ X −→ Z the associated map (f g)! → g! f !
need not be an isomorphism, see [Nm14]. For flat E-maps—the maps with
which we shall be mainly concerned—the agreement of the oplax (−)! with
the preceding pseudofunctor results from [Nm14, Proposition 13.11].
1.2. (Verdier’s isomorphism, fundamental class and the “Ideal Theorem.”)
In the original working out ([H66], amended in [C00], [C01]) of the duality
theory conceived by Grothendieck and Verdier, the main result, Corollary 3.4
on p. 383, is roughly that in the presence of residual complexes,2 when confined to finite-type scheme-maps and complexes with coherent homology the
pseudofunctor (−)! is obtained by pasting together concrete realizations of
its restriction to smooth maps and to finite maps. This is a special case of
the “Ideal Theorem” in [H66, p. 6].
For finite f : X → Z, the canonical concrete realization is induced by the
usual sheafified duality isomorphism (see (2.6.5)):
(1.2.1)
∼
Rf∗ f !F = Rf∗ RHom(OX , f !F ) −→
RHom(f∗ OX , F ) (F ∈ D+qc (Z)).
For formally smooth f : X → Z in E, of relative dimension d (section 2.3),
a canonical concrete realization is given by an isomorphism
(1.2.2)
∼
f !F −→
Ωfd [d] ⊗X f ∗F
(F ∈ D+qc (Z)),
where Ωfd is the sheaf of relative d-forms and “[d]” denotes d-fold translation
(shift) in D(X).
1The frequent references in this paper to [L09] are due much more to the approach and
convenience of that source than to its originality.
2The theory of residual complexes presented in [H66, Chapters 6 and 7] is considerably
generalized in [?].
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
3
The initial avatar of such an isomorphism uses a trace map for residual complexes (that are assumed to exist). In particular, when f is proper
there results an explicit (but somewhat complicated) description of SerreGrothendieck duality. (See e.g., [C00, §3.4].)
A definition of an isomorphism with the same source and target as (1.2.2),
but not requiring residual complexes, was given by Verdier in [V68, proof of
Theorem 3]. We review and expand upon this classical isomorphism in §3.
In particular, Proposition 3.4.4 explicates compatibility of the isomorphism
with derived tensor product.
For any flat E-map f : X → Z, let δ = δf : X → X ×Z X be the diagonal
of f . There is a D+qc -map
Cf : δ∗δ∗ f ∗ → f !,
the fundamental class of f, from the relative Hochschild functor to the relative dualizing functor, see Definition 4.2.
The fundamental class is compatible with derived tensor product, see
Proposition 4.3.
When the flat map f is equidimensional of relative dimension d, applying
the homology functor H −d to Cf leads to a map cf from the target of the
map (1.2.2) to the source (Section 4.4 below.) Propositon 2.4.2 in [AJL14]
asserts that if, moreover, f is formally smooth, then cf is an isomorphism.
The proof uses Verdier’s isomorphism, and of course begs the question of
whether that isomorphism is inverse to cf .
That this does hold is our main result, Theorem 4.5.
Thus, the map cf extends the inverse of Verdier’s isomorphism, from the
class of formally smooth E-maps to the class of arbitrary flat equidimensional
E-maps.
Remarks 1.2.3. (a) The above discussion has been limited, for simplicity,
to D+qc ; but the results will be established for Dqc .
(b) The isomorphisms in play are not quite canonical: there are choices
involved that affect the resulting homology maps up to sign. For example,
for a scheme Y and an OY -ideal I, there are two natural identifications
Y
of I/I 2 with Tor O
1 (OY /I, OY /I ), one the negative of the other; and we
will have to choose one of them (see (3.2.1) ff.) We will also have to assign
different roles to the two projections of X ×Z X to X, necessitating another
arbitrary choice. See also [S04, §7.1].
Our choices minimize sign considerations, under the constraint of respect
for the usual triangulated structure on the derived sheaf-hom functor (see
the remarks following equations (3.1.5) and (3.2.5)). Other choices might
have done as well.
(c) In the present vein, we propose it as a nontrivial exercise (that, as
far as we know, no one has carried out) to specify the relation between the
above “initial avatar” of the fundamental class and Verdier’s isomorphism.
(Both isomorphisms have been known for fifty years or so.)
4
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
We believe that the fundamental class is important enough, historically
and technically, to merit the kind of scrutiny it gets in this paper. For instance, familiarity with various of its aspects could well prove useful in
establishing that the pseudofunctor (−)! together with the isomorphisms in
(1.2.1) and (1.2.2) satisfy VAR 1–6 (mutatis mutandis) in [H66, p. 186]—a
version over all of E of the “Ideal Theorem.” It is hoped that a full treatment
of this application will materialize in the not-too-distant future.
1.3. (Additional background: fundamental class and residues.) More history and
motivation behind the fundamental class can be found in [AJL14, §0.6].
A preliminary version of the fundamental class, with roots in the dualizing properties of differentials on normal varieties, appears in [G60, p. 114], followed by some
brief hints about connections with residues. In [L84], there is a concrete treatment
of the case when S = Spec(k) with k a perfect field and f : X → Spec k an integral
algebraic k-scheme. The principal result (“Residue Theorem”) reifies cf as a globalization of the local residue maps at the points of X, leading to explicit versions
of local and global duality and the relation between them. This is generalized to
certain maps of noetherian schemes in [HS93].
The close relation between the fundamental class and residues becomes clearer,
and more general, over formal schemes, where local and global duality merge into
a single theory with fundamental classes and residues conjoined. (See [L01, §5.5];
a complete exposition has yet to appear.)
2. Preliminaries
In this section we describe those parts of the duality machinery, along
with a few of their basic properties, that we will subsequently use. The
reader is advised initially to skip to the next section, referring back to this
one as needed.
2.1. Unless otherwise specified, we will be working exclusively with functors
between full subcategories of categories of the form D(X) (see beginning
of §1.1); so to reduce clutter we will write:
• f∗ instead of Rf∗ (f a scheme-map),
• f ∗ instead of Lf ∗ (f a scheme-map),
• ⊗ instead of ⊗L .
• Hom instead of RHom. (This is the derived sheaf-hom functor.)
2.2. For any scheme-map f : X → Z, the functor f∗ : D(X) → D(Z) is
symmetric monoidal; this entails, in particular, a functorial map
(2.2.1)
f∗ E1 ⊗Z f∗ E2 → f∗ (E1 ⊗X E2 )
(Ei ∈ D(X)),
see e.g., [L09, 3.4.4(b)].
The functor f ∗ : D(Z) → D(X) is pseudofunctorially left-adjoint to f∗
f
g
[L09, 3.6.7(d)]. This means that for scheme-maps X −→ Z −→ W , the
∼ g f and f ∗ g ∗ −→
∼ (gf )∗ are conjugate,
canonical isomorphisms (gf )∗ −→
∗ ∗
see [L09, 3.3.7(a)].
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
5
For fixed B ∈ D(X), the functor − ⊗X B is left-adjoint to HomX (B, −)
(see e.g., [L09, (2.6.1)′ ]). The resulting counit map
(2.2.2)
ev(X, B, C) : HomX (B, C) ⊗X B → C
(C ∈ D(X))
is referred to as “evaluation.”
2.3. A scheme-map f : X → Z is essentially of finite type if every z ∈ Z has
an affine open neighborhood Spec A whose inverse image is a union of finitely
many affine open subschemes Spec Bi such that each Bi is a localization of
a finitely generated A-algebra.
Throughout, E will be the category of essentially-finite-type separated
maps of noetherian schemes.
The category E is closed under scheme-theoretic fiber product.
An E-map f : X → Z is essentially smooth if it is flat and it has geometrically regular fibers; or equivalently, if f is formally smooth, that is, for each
x ∈ X and z := f (x), the local ring OX,x is formally smooth over OZ,z for
the discrete topologies, see [EGA4, 17.1.2, 17.1.6] and [EGA4, Chapter 0,
19.3.3, 19.3.5(iv) and 22.6.4 a)⇔ c)]. (For this equivalence, which involves
only local properties, it can be assumed that X = Spec A and Z = Spec BS
where B is a finite-type A-algebra and S ⊂ B is a multiplicatively closed
subset; then the relevant local rings are the same for f or for the finite-type
map g : Spec B → Spec A, so that one only needs the equivalence for g, as
given by [EGA4, 6.8.6].)
For essentially smooth f : X → Z, the diagonal map X → X ×Z X
is a regular immersion, see [EGA4, 16.9.2], [EGA4, 16.10.2] and [EGA4,
16.10.5]—whose proof is valid for E-maps.
Arguing as in [EGA4, 17.10.2], one gets that for essentially smooth f
the relative differential sheaf Ωf is locally free over OX ; moreover, when
f is of finite type the rank of Ωf at x ∈ X is the dimension at x of the
fiber f −1f (x). For any essentially smooth f , the (locally constant) rank
of Ωf will be referred to as the relative dimension of f .
An E-map is essentially étale if it is essentially smooth and has relative
dimension 0 (cf. [EGA4, 17.6.1]).
2.4. An OX -complex E (X a scheme) is perfect if each x ∈ X has an open
neighborhood U = Ux such that the restriction E|U is D(U )-isomorphic to
a bounded complex of finite-rank free OU -modules.
When applied to E-maps, the term “perfect” means “having finite tordimension” (or “finite flat dimension”).
Perfection of maps is preserved under composition and under flat base
change, see e.g., [I71, p. 243, 3.4 and p. 245, 3.5.1 ].
2.5. Let D+qc (X) ⊂ Dqc (X) ⊂ D(X) be as at the beginning of §1.1.
For any E-map f : X → Z, there exists a functor f × : D(Z) → Dqc (X)
that is bounded below and right-adjoint to Rf∗ . (See e.g., [L09, §4.1].) In
×
, the derived
particular, with idX the identity map of X one has a functor idX
quasi-coherator, right-adjoint to the inclusion Dqc (X) ֒→ D(X).
6
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
For any complexes A and B in Dqc (X), and with notation as in §2.1, set
(2.5.1)
qc
×
HomX (A, B) ∈ Dqc (X).
HomX
(A, B) := idX
Dqc (X) is a (symmetric monoidal) closed category, with multiplication
qc
(derived) ⊗X and internal hom HomX
(cf. e.g., [L09, 3.5.2(d)]).
×
∼ C.
C −→
For C ∈ Dqc (X), the counit map is a D(X)-isomorphism idX
qc
So for A, B ∈ D(X), the counit map HomX (A, B) → HomX (A, B) is an
isomorphism when HomX (A, B) ∈ Dqc (X)—for example, when B ∈ D+qc (X)
and the cohomology sheaves H i A are coherent for all i, vanishing for i ≫ 0,
see [H66, p. 92, 3.3].
2.6. We will use some standard functorial maps, gathered together here,
that are associated to an E-map f : X → Z and objects E• ∈ Dqc (X),
F• ∈ Dqc (Z), G• ∈ Dqc (Z). For the most part, the definitions of these maps
emerge category-theoretically from Section 2.2, cf. [L09, §3.5.4].
(a) The map
(2.6.1)
f ∗ (F ⊗Z G) −→ f ∗F ⊗X f ∗ G
that is adjoint to the natural composite
(2.2.1)
F ⊗Z G −→ f∗ f ∗F ⊗Z f∗ f ∗G −−−−→ f∗ (f ∗F ⊗X f ∗G).
The map (2.6.1) is an isomorphism [L09, 3.2.4].
(b) The sheafified adjunction isomorphism:
(2.6.2)
∼
f∗ HomX (f ∗ G, E) −→
HomZ (G, f∗ E),
right-conjugate [ILN14, §1.6], for each fixed G, to the isomorphism (2.6.1).
(c) The projection isomorphisms, see, e.g., [L09, 3.9.4]:
∼
(2.6.3) f∗ E ⊗Z G −→
f∗ (E ⊗X f ∗G)
∼
and G ⊗LZ f∗ E −→
f∗ (f ∗G ⊗LX E).
These are, respectively, the natural composites
(2.2.1)
f∗ E ⊗Z G −→ f∗ E ⊗Z f∗ f ∗G −−−−→ f∗ (E ⊗X f ∗G),
(2.2.1)
G ⊗Z f∗ E −→ f∗ f ∗G ⊗Z f∗ E −−−−→ f∗ (f ∗G ⊗X E).
(The definitions make sense for arbitrary scheme-maps, though in that generality the composites are not always isomorphisms.)
(d) The map
(2.6.4)
f ∗ HomZ (G, F ) −→ HomX (f ∗G, f ∗F )
that is f ∗ -f∗ adjoint to the natural composite map
∼
f∗ HomX (f ∗G, f ∗F ).
HomZ (G, F ) −→ HomZ (G, f∗ f ∗F ) −→
(2.6.2)
This is an isomorphism if the map f is perfect, G is homologically boundedabove, with coherent homology sheaves, and F ∈ D+qc (Z), see [L09, Proposition 4.6.6].
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
7
The map (2.6.4) is Hom-⊗ adjoint to the natural composite map
∼
f ∗ HomZ (G, F ) ⊗X f ∗ G −→
f ∗ (HomZ (G, F ) ⊗Z G) −→ f ∗ F,
(2.6.1)
see [L09, Exercise 3.5.6(a)].
(e) The duality isomorphism:
(2.6.5)
qc
∼
ζ(E, F ) : f∗ HomX
(E, f ×F ) −→
Homqc
Z (f∗ E, F ),
right-conjugate, for each fixed E to the projection isomorphism
L
∼
f∗ (f ∗ G ⊗X
E) ←−
G ⊗LZ f∗ E .
(f ) The bifunctorial map
(2.6.6)
χf (F, G) : f !F ⊗X f ∗G → f !(F ⊗Z G),
defined in [Nm14, 13.1, 13.2 and 13.3] (with ‘σ’ instead of ‘χ’), and shown
in [Nm14, 13.11] to be an isomorphism whenever the map f is perfect.
When f is proper, f ! is right-adjoint to f∗ and the map χf is adjoint to
the natural composite map
∼
f∗ (f !F ⊗X f ∗ G) −→
f∗ f !F ⊗Z G −→ F ⊗Z G.
(2.6.3)
In particular, χf (OZ , G) identifies with a map of triangulated functors
f # G := f ! OZ ⊗X f ∗G → f ! G.
∼
Note however that whereas the isomorphism f ! (G[1]) −→
(f ! G)[1] associated with
!
the triangulated structure on f is the identity map, the same is not true of f # .
(See [L09, just before 1.5.5].)
(g) The base change map
(2.6.7)
β♣ (F ) : v ∗f !F −→ g ! u∗F
associated to a fiber square in E:
v
X ′ −−−−→
gy
♣
X
f
y
Z ′ −−−−→ Z
u
with f any E-map and u (hence v) flat. This map is defined in [Nm14, 11.6
and 11.7], and denoted θ : R −→ S, where R, S are (repectively) the maps
taking the cartesian square to v ∗ f ! and g! u∗ .
In general, this is not an isomorphism. But if F ∈ D+qc (Z) then this is
the isomorphism of [L09, Thm. 4.8.3] and [Nk09, Theorem 5.3]; and for any
F ∈ Dqc (Z), if f is perfect then this is the isomorphism of [AJL11, §5.8.4].
(It actually suffices for g to be perfect, see [Nm14, 11.13(i)].)
8
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
(h) The bifunctorial map
(2.6.8)
κX (E1 , E2 , E3 ) : HomX (E1 , E2 ) ⊗X E3 → HomX (E1 , E2 ⊗X E3 )
adjoint to the natural composite—with ev the evaluation map (2.2.2)—
via ev
∼
HomX (E1 , E2 )⊗X E3 ⊗X E1 −→
HomX (E1 , E2 )⊗X E1 ⊗X E3 −−−→ E2 ⊗X E3 .
The map (2.6.8) is an isomorphism if the complex E1 is perfect. Indeed,
the question is local on X, so one can assume that E1 is a bounded complex of
finite-rank free OX -modules, and conclude via a simple induction (like that
in the second-last paragraph in the proof of [L09, 4.6.7]) on the number of
degrees in which E1 doesn’t vanish.
Similarly, (2.6.8) is an isomorphism if E3 is perfect.
The projection map (2.6.3) is compatible with derived tensor product, in
the following sense:
Lemma 2.7. Let f : X → Z be a scheme map, E ∈ D(X), F, G ∈ D(Z).
The following natural diagram, where ⊗ stands for ⊗X or ⊗Z , commutes.
(2.6.3)
(f∗ E ⊗ F ) ⊗ G
f∗ (E ⊗ f ∗F ) ⊗ G
(2.6.3)
f∗ (E ⊗ f ∗F ) ⊗ f ∗ G
≃
f∗ E ⊗ (F ⊗ G)
≃
(2.6.3)
f∗ E ⊗ f ∗ (F ⊗ G)
(2.6.1)
f∗ E ⊗ (f ∗ F ⊗ f ∗ G)
Proof. After substituting for each instance of (2.6.3) its definition, and recalling (2.2.1), one comes down to proving commutativity of the border of
the following diagram—whose maps are the obvious ones:
(f∗ E ⊗ f∗ f ∗F ) ⊗ G
(f∗ E ⊗ F ) ⊗ G
f∗ (E ⊗ f ∗F ) ⊗ G
(f∗ E ⊗ f∗ f ∗F ) ⊗ f∗ f ∗ G
f∗ E ⊗ (F ⊗ G)
f∗ E ⊗ (f∗ f ∗F ⊗ G)
6
f∗ E ⊗ f∗ f ∗(F ⊗ G)
f∗ E ⊗ f ∗ (F ⊗ G)
f∗ E ⊗ (f∗ f ∗F ⊗ f∗ f ∗ G)
f∗ E ⊗ f∗ (f ∗F ⊗ f ∗ G)
f∗ (E ⊗ f ∗F ) ⊗ f∗ f ∗ G
f∗ (E ⊗ f ∗F ) ⊗ f ∗ G
7
f∗ E ⊗ (f ∗F ⊗ f ∗ G)
The commutativity of subdiagram 6 follows directly from the definition
of (2.6.1). Commutativity of 7 is given by symmetric monoidality of f∗ ,
see §2.2. Commutativity of the other subdiagrams is pretty well obvious,
whence the conclusion.
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
9
For the map (2.6.8) we’ll need a “transitivity” property—an instance of
the Kelly-Mac Lane coherence theorem [KM71, p. 107, Theorem 2.4]:
Lemma 2.8. With κ := κX as in (2.6.8), κ(E1 , E2 , E3 ⊗ E4 ) factors as
κ(E1 ,E2 ,E3 )⊗id
HomX (E1 , E2 ) ⊗ E3 ⊗ E4 −−−−−−−−−−→ HomX (E1 , E2 ⊗ E3 ) ⊗ E4
κ(E1 ,E2 ⊗E3 ,E4 )
−−−−−−−−−−→ HomX (E1 , E2 ⊗ E3 ⊗ E4 ).
Proof. The assertion results from commutativity of the following natural
diagram—where [−, −] := HomX (−, −), ⊗ := ⊗X , and various associativity
isomorphisms are omitted:
[E1 , E2 ] ⊗ E3 ⊗ E4 ⊗ E1
f
[E1 , E2 ] ⊗ E3 ⊗ E1 ⊗ E4
f
[E1 , E2 ] ⊗ E1 ⊗ E3 ⊗ E4
via κ
1
2
[E1 , E2 ⊗ E3 ] ⊗ E1 ⊗ E4
via κ
≃
via ev
via ev
3
[E1 , E2 ⊗ E3 ] ⊗ E4 ⊗ E1
via κ
[E1 , E2 ⊗ E3 ⊗ E4 ] ⊗ E1
ev
E2 ⊗ E3 ⊗ E4
Commutativity of subdiagram 1 is clear; and that of 2 and 3 follow from
the definitions of κ(E1 , E2 , E3 ) and κ(E1 , E2 ⊗ E3 , E4 ), respectively.
2.9. Let δ : X → Y be an E-map, and p : Y → X a scheme-map such that
pδ = idX . We will be using the bifunctorial isomorphism
∼
ψ = ψ(δ, p, E, F ) : δ∗δ∗ E ⊗X F −→
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗X F )
(E, F ∈ Dqc (X))
that is defined to be the natural composite
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗X F )
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗X F
(2.9.1)
≃
≃
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗X δ∗p∗F
f
(2.6.1)
δ∗ (δ∗ E ⊗Y p∗F )
f
(2.6.3)
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗X δ∗p∗F )
(Cf. [AJL14, (2.2.6)].)
The rest of this subsection brings out properties of ψ needed later on.
Lemma 2.9.2. With preceding notation, the isomorphism ψ(δ, p, E, δ∗ p∗F )
factors as
∼
∼
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗X δ∗p∗F −→
δ∗ (δ∗ E ⊗Y p∗F ) −→
δ∗ δ∗ (E ⊗X δ∗p∗F ).
(2.6.1)
(2.6.3)
Proof. This results from the fact that the natural composites
ψ(δ, p,E,δ∗p∗F )
∼
∼
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ F −→
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ δ∗p∗F −−−−−−−−−→ δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ δ∗p∗F ) −→
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F )
and
(2.6.3) ◦ (2.6.1)
∼
∼
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F )
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ F −→
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ δ∗p∗F −−−−−−−−−→ δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ δ∗p∗F ) −→
are both equal to ψ(δ, p, E, F ) (the first by functoriality of ψ, and the second
by definition).
10
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
Corollary 2.9.3. The following natural diagram commutes.
ψ
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ F
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F )
E ⊗F
Proof. One can replace F by the isomorphic complex δ∗p∗F, whereupon the
assertion follows from Lemma 2.9.2 via [L09, 3.4.6.2].
Lemma 2.9.4. For E, F1 , F2 ∈ Dqc (X), with ψ(−, −) := ψ(δ, p, −, −) and
⊗ := ⊗X , the isomorphism ψ(E, F1 ⊗ F2 ) factors (modulo associativity
isomorphisms) as
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ F1 ⊗ F2 −−−−f
−−−−→ δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F1 ) ⊗ F2
ψ(E, F1 ) ⊗ id
−−−−f
−−−−→ δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F1 ⊗ F2 )
ψ(E ⊗F1 , F2 )
Proof. The Lemma asserts commutativity the border of the next diagram,
in which ⊗ stands for ⊗X or ⊗Y , and the maps are the obvious ones:
δ∗ (δ∗ E ⊗ p∗F1 ) ⊗ F2
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ F1 ⊗ F2
δ∗ (δ∗ E ⊗ p∗F1 ) ⊗ δ∗p∗F2
1
δ∗ (δ∗ E ⊗ p∗F1 ⊗ p∗F2 )
δ∗ δ∗ E ⊗ p∗ (F1 ⊗ F2 )
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ δ∗p∗F1 ) ⊗ F2
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ δ∗p∗F1 ) ⊗ δ∗p∗F2
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F1 ) ⊗ F2
2
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ δ∗ (p∗F1 ⊗ p∗F2 )
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ δ∗p∗ (F1 ⊗ F2 )
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F1 ) ⊗ δ∗p∗F2
δ∗ (δ∗ (E ⊗ δ∗p∗F1 ) ⊗ p∗F2 )
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ δ∗p∗F1 ⊗ δ∗p∗F2 )
3
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F1 ⊗ F2 )
δ∗δ∗ (E ⊗ F1 ⊗ δ∗p∗F2 )
δ∗ (δ∗ (E ⊗ F1 ) ⊗ p∗F2 )
Commutativity of the unlabeled subdiagrams is easy to verify.
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
Subdiagram
1
11
expands naturally as
δ∗ (δ∗ E ⊗ p∗F1 ) ⊗ F2
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ δ∗p∗F1 ⊗ F2
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ F1 ⊗ F2
4
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ δ∗p∗ (F1 ⊗ F2 )
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ δ∗p∗F1 ⊗ δ∗p∗F2
δ∗δ∗ E ⊗ δ∗ (p∗F1 ⊗ p∗F2 )
δ∗ δ∗ E ⊗ p∗ (F1 ⊗ F2 )
5
δ∗ (δ∗ E ⊗ p∗F1 ⊗ p∗F2 )
δ∗ (δ∗ E ⊗ p∗F1 ) ⊗ δ∗p∗F2
For commutativity of 4 , see the proof of [L09, 3.6.10]. For that of 5 ,
see [L09, Example 3.4.4(b)]. Commutativity of the other two subdiagrams
is clear, and so 1 commutes.
Commutativity of 2 is given by Lemma 2.7.
Finally, for commutativity of 3 , see again the proof of [L09, 3.6.10].
Corollary 2.9.5. Upon identifying—as one may—G ⊗ OX with G for all
G ∈ D(X), one has that ψ := ψ(E, OX ) is the identity map of δ∗ δ∗ E.
Proof. The case F1 = F2 = OX of Lemma 2.9.4 implies that ψ 2 = ψ, whence
ψ = ψ 2 ψ −1 = ψψ −1 = id.
3. Verdier’s isomorphism
Recall from Section 2.1 that, unless otherwise specified, all the functors
that appear are functors between derived categories.
i
f
3.1. Let U −
→X −
→ Z be E-maps, with i essentially étale, and let
p
Y := U ×Z X −−−2−→
p1
♠
y
U
X
f
y
−−−−→ Z
fi
be the resulting fiber square, where p1 and p2 are the canonical projections.
With δU the diagonal map and idU the identity map of U, the composite
(3.1.1)
δ
id ×i
g : U −−U→ U ×Z U −−U−−→ U ×Z X
is the graph of i, i.e., p1 g = idU and p2 g = i.
In Theorem 3 of [V68], f i is essentially smooth, of relative dimension,
say, d (see Section 2.3 above); and that theorem says there is a D(U )isomorphism
V
∼
(f i)! OZ −→
Ωfdi [d] := d Ωf i [d].
12
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
A slight elaboration of Verdier’s approach produces, as follows, a functorial isomorphism
∼
(3.1.2)
vf,i (F ) : (f i)!F −→
Ωfdi [d] ⊗U (f i)∗F
F ∈ D+qc (Z) .
In particular, making the allowable identifications
Ωfdi [d] ⊗X (f i)∗ OZ = Ωfdi [d] ⊗X OX = Ωfdi [d],
we consider vf,i (OZ ) to be a map from (f i)! OZ to Ωfdi [d].
(In §3.4, the definition of vf,i (F ) will be extended to all F ∈ Dqc (Z).)
The construction of vf,i (F ) uses two maps. The first is the following natural composite map ϑ—whose definition needs only that f i be flat—with
χg as in (2.6.6), and β♠ as in (2.6.7) (an isomorphism since F ∈ D+qc (Y )):
∼
ϑ : g! OY ⊗U (f i)!F −→
g ! OY ⊗U i∗f !F
∼
−→
g ! OY ⊗U g∗p∗2 f !F
(3.1.3)
χg
−→ g!p∗2 f !F
β♠
−→ g! p!1 (f i)∗F
∼
−→
(f i)∗F.
If f i is essentially smooth, then in (3.1.1), both idU × i and the regular
immersion δU are perfect, whence so is g (see §2.4), so that χg is an isomorphism.3 Thus, in this case, ϑ is an isomorphism.
The second is an isomorphism that holds when f i is essentially smooth
of relative dimension d,
(3.1.4)
∼
g! OY −→
HomU (Ωfdi , OU )[−d],
described in [H66, p. 180, Corollary 7.3] or [C00, §2.5] via the “fundamental
local isomorphism” and Cartan-Eilenberg resolutions. An avatar (3.2.8)
of (3.1.4) is reviewed in §3.2 below.
The OU -module Ωfdi is invertible, so the complexes HomU (Ωfdi , OU )[−d]
and HomU (Ωfdi [d], OU ) are naturally isomorphic in D(U ) to the complex G
which is (Ωfdi )−1 in degree d and 0 elsewhere. Modulo these isomorphisms,
the isomorphism
(3.1.5)
∼
HomU (Ωfdi [d], OU ),
HomU (Ωfdi , OU )[−d] −→
resulting from the usual triangulated structure on the functor Hom(−, OU )
2
is given by scalar multiplication in G by (−1)d +d(d−1)/2 = (−1)d(d+1))/2
(cf. [C00, p. 11, (1.3.8)].)
3 As δ is finite and id × i is essentially étale, one can see this more concretely by
U
U
showing that δU∗ (χ) is isomorphic to the natural map
Hom(δU∗ OU , OU×Z U ) ⊗ G −→ Hom(δU∗ OU , G)
(G := (idU × i)∗p∗2 f !F ).
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
13
Let
(3.1.6)
∼
γ : g ! OY −→
HomU (Ωfdi [d], OU )
be the isomorphism obtained by composition from (3.1.4) and (3.1.5).
Thus when f i is essentially smooth, so that Ωfdi is an invertible OU module, one has a chain of natural functorial isomorphisms, the first being
inverse to the evaluation map 2.2.2:
∼
(f i)!F −→
HomU (Ωfdi [d], (f i)!F ) ⊗U Ωfdi [d]
∼
−→
HomU (Ωfdi [d], OU ) ⊗U (f i)!F ⊗U Ωfdi [d]
(3.1.7)
(2.6.8)
∼
g ! OY ⊗U (f i)!F ⊗U Ωfdi [d]
−→
(3.1.6)
∼
∼
Ωfdi [d] ⊗U (f i)∗F.
−→ (f i)∗F ⊗U Ωfdi [d] −→
(3.1.3)
The map vf,i (F ) is defined to be the composition of this chain.
3.2. Expanding a bit on [LS81, §2, II], we review the relation (3.2.7) between the normal bundle of a regular immersion δ : U → W and the relative
dualizing complex δ! OW ; and from that deduce the isomorphism (3.1.4).
Let δ : U → W be any closed immersion of schemes, and I the kernel of
the associated surjective map s : OW ։ δ∗ OU . Then
0 ∗
H δ s
OU ∼
= H 0 δ∗OW −−−−→ H 0 δ∗δ∗ OU ∼
= OU ,
is an isomorphism.
The natural triangle
δ∗s
+
δ∗I −→ δ∗ OW −−→ δ∗δ∗ OU −→
gives rise to an exact sequence of OU -modules
t
H −1 δ∗ OW −−−−→ H −1 δ∗δ∗ OU −−−−→ H 0 δ∗I −−−−→ ker(H 0 δ∗s)
0
I/I 2
0
Clearly, t is an isomorphism, and so one has the natural OU -isomorphism
(3.2.1)
∼
t−1 : I/I 2 −→
H −1 δ∗δ∗ OU .
(The isomorphism t is induced by the projection C[−1] ։ P , where K → I
is a flat resolution of I and C is the mapping cone of the composite map
K → I ֒→ OW . It is the negative of the connecting homomorphism
OW
W
Tor O
1 (δ∗ OU , δ∗ OU ) → Tor 0 (δ∗ OU , I)
usually attached to the natural exact sequence 0 → I → OW → δ∗ OU → 0,
see [L09, end of §1.4].)
14
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
There is an alternating graded OU -algebra structure on ⊕n≥0 H −n δ∗δ∗ OU ,
induced by the natural product map
∼
∼
δ∗δ∗ OU ⊗U δ∗δ∗ OU −→
δ∗ (δ∗ OU ⊗W δ∗ OU ) −→ δ∗δ∗ (OU ⊗U OU ) −→
δ∗δ∗ OU .
(Cf. e.g., [B07, p. 201, Exercise 9(c)].) Hence (3.2.1) extends uniquely to a
homomorphism of graded OU -algebras
(3.2.2)
⊕n≥0
Vn
(I/I 2 ) −→ ⊕n≥0 H −n δ∗δ∗ OU .
For example, over an affine open subset of W, if I is generated by a regular
sequence of global sections t := (t1 , t2 , . . . , td ) then a finite free resolution of
δ∗ OU is provided by the Koszul complex K(t) := ⊗di=1 Ki where Ki is the
ti
complex which is OW −
→ OW in degrees -1 and 0 and vanishes elsewhere;
and there results a D(U )-map,
Vn
∼
∼ δ∗K(t) −→
(I/I 2 )[n] =
δ∗δ∗ OU .
(3.2.3)
⊕d
n=0
δ∗K(t)
(Note that
is just the exterior algebra—with vanishing differentials—
on OUn , which is isomorphic to I/I 2 via the natural map
n
OW
= K −1 (t) ֒→ I ⊂ OW .)
One verifies that applying the functor H −n to (3.2.3) produces the degree n
component of (3.2.2) (a map that does not depend on the choice of the
generating family t).
Next, for any OU -complex E with H eE = 0 for all e < 0, the natural map
0
H E → E induces a map
(3.2.4)
H 0 HomU (E, OU ) −→ H 0 Hom(H 0E, OU ) =: Hom0 (H 0E, OU ).
Hence for any integer n and any OU -complex F such that H eF = 0 for
all e < −n, one has the natural composite
(3.2.5)
∼
H n HomU (F, OU ) −→
H 0 HomU (F, OU )[n]
∼
−→
H 0 HomU (F [−n], OU )
∼
−→ Hom0 (H 0 (F [−n]), OU ) −→
Hom0 (H −n F, OU ).
(3.2.4)
(The second map—whose source and target are equal—is multiplication by
(−1)n(n+1)/2 : replace OU by a quasi-isomorphic injective complex, and take
p = 0, m = −n in the expression (−1)pm+m(m−1)/2 after [C00, p. 11, (1.3.8)].)
Now if the closed immersion δ is regular, of codimension d, i.e., I is generated locally by regular sequences t of length d, so that δ∗ OU is locally
resolved by free complexes of the form K(t), then there results the sequence
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
15
of isomorphisms
∼
H d δ∗δ∗ δ! OW −→
H d δ∗ HomW (δ∗ OU , OW )
(1.2.1)
∼
−→ H d HomU (δ∗δ∗ OU , OU )
(2.6.4)
(3.2.6)
∼
Hom0U (H −d δ∗δ∗ OU , OU )
−→
(3.2.5)
∼
V
−→ Hom0U ( d(I/I 2 ), OU ).
(3.2.2)
In particular, there is a canonical OU -isomorphism
V
∼
H d δ∗δ∗ δ! OW −→
Hom0U d (I/I 2 ), OU =: νδ .
Moreover, since δ∗ δ! OW ∼
= HomW (δ∗ OU , OW ) has nonvanishing homology
only in degree d, therefore the same holds for δ! OW , whence the natural
maps are isomorphisms
∼
∼
δ! OW [d] −→
H d δ! OW ←−
H d δ∗δ∗ δ! OW .
Thus, when δ is a regular immersion there is a canonical isomorphism
∼
δ! OW −→
νδ [−d].
(3.2.7)
It is left to the interested reader to work out the precise relationship of (3.2.7)
to the similar isomorphisms in [H66, p. 180, Corollary 7.3] and [C00, §2.5].
Now in (3.1.1), if f i is essentially smooth of relative dimension d then
δU : U → W := U ×Z U is a regular immersion and Ωfdi is locally free of rank
∼ Hom (Ω d , O ) is
one (see §2.3), so the natural map Hom0U (Ωfdi , OU ) −→
U
U
fi
an isomorphism. Thus, there are natural isomorphisms, with Y := U ×Z X,
(3.2.8)
∼
g! OY −→
δU! (idU × i)! OY = δU! (idU × i)∗ OY = δU! OW
V
∼
−→
Hom0U ( d(I/I 2 ), OU )[−d] = HomU (Ωfdi , OU )[−d].
(3.2.7)
The isomorphism (3.1.4) is defined to be the resulting composition.
3.3. Though it is not a priori clear, vf,i depends only on the map f i and not
on its factorization into f and i. (In [V68], f is assumed proper.) Indeed:
i
f
Proposition 3.3.1. For U −
→X−
→ Z as in §3.1, if f i is essentially smooth
then vf,i = vf i, idU .
Proof. There is a commutative E-diagram, with i, f , p1 , p2 and g as in §3.1,
δ the diagonal map, q1 , q2 the canonical projections, and ♠, ♣ and ♥ labeling
the front, top and rear faces of the cube, respectively. (These three faces
are fiber squares; and since f i is flat therefore so are p2 and q2 .)
16
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
δ
U
q2
W := U ×Z U
g
j :=
id ×
i
♣
p2
Y := U ×Z X
U
i
X
fi
♥
q1
f
♠
p1
U
U
Z
fi
Z
fi
Note that since i is essentially étale therefore i! = i∗ and j ! = j ∗.
There is, as in (3.2.8), a natural composite isomorphism
∼
∼
ξ : g! OY −→
δ! j ! OY = δ! j ∗ OY −→
δ! OW .
A detailed examination of the definition of vf,i in (3.1.7), taking into
account the definition (3.2.8) of (3.1.4), shows that it will suffice to prove
commutativity of the border of the following natural functorial diagram.
via ξ
g! OY ⊗ (f i)!
δ! OW ⊗ (f i)!
≃
g! OY
⊗ i∗f !
δ! j ! OY ⊗ i∗f !
≃
g ! (OY ⊗ g ∗ p∗2 f ! )
≃
1
g! OY ⊗ g∗ p∗2 f !
χg
δ! j ∗ OY ⊗ i∗f !
δ! j ! OY ⊗ δ∗j ∗ p∗2 f !
χδ
δ! (j ! OY ⊗ j ∗ p∗2 f ! )
δ! OW ⊗ δ∗q2∗ (f i)!
δ! OW ⊗ δ∗q2∗ i∗f !
χδ
2
≃
χδ
δ! (OW ⊗ q2∗ (f i)! )
δ! (OW ⊗ q2∗ i∗f ! )
3
δ! χj
g! p∗2 f !
δ! (OW ⊗ j ∗ p∗2 f ! )
δ! j ! p∗2 f ! = δ! j ∗ p∗2 f !
g!β♠
via β♠
g! p!1 (f i)∗
δ! j ! p!1 (f i)∗
≃
δ! q2∗ i∗f !
δ !β ♥
4
δ! (p1 j)! (f i)∗
5
(f i)∗
δ! q2∗ (f i)!
≃
δ! q1! (f i)∗
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
17
Commutativity of subdiagram 1 (resp. 5 ) results from the pseudofunctoriality of (−)∗ (resp. (−)! ).
Commutativity of 2 is given by transitivity of χ with respect to composition of maps, see [Nm14, 13.4] (or [L09, Exercises 4.7.3.4(d) and 4.9.3(d)]).
Commutativity of 3 follows from the fact that for any F ∈ D+qc (Y ), the
following natural diagram commutes:
j ∗OY ⊗ j ∗F
j ! OY ⊗ j ∗F
χj
≃
31
j ! (OY ⊗ F )
f
OW ⊗ j ∗F
3 2
j ∗ (OY ⊗ F )
j ∗F
For a sketch of the proof that 3 1 commutes see [L09, 4.9.2.3]. As for
commutativity of 3 2 , replacement of F by a quasi-isomorphic flat complex
reduces the problem to the context of ordinary (nonderived) functors, at
which point the justification is left to the reader.
Commutativity of 4 is given by transitivity of β with respect to juxtaposition of fiber squares (see [Nm14, Theorem 11.9] or [L09, Theorem 4.8.3]),
as applied to the following decomposition of the fiber square ♥:
q
• −−−2−→
jy
♣
p
• −−−2−→
p1
♠
y
•
yi
•
f
y
• −−−−→ •
fi
∼ j ∗ p∗
Here one needs to use that β♣ is the canonical isomorphism q2∗ i∗ −→
2
′
(see [Nm14, 11.4 and 11.5] with p = p = identity map in the diagram of
[Nm14, 11.4(i)], or [L09, 4.8.8(i)].)
Commutativity of the remaining subdiagrams is easy to check, whence
the assertion.
Accordingly, we restrict henceforth to the case U = X and i = idX . The
map g : X → X ⊗Z X is then the diagonal.
3.4. Again, let f : X → Z be an essentially smooth E-map of relative dimension d. With χf as in (2.6.6), define vf (F ) for F ∈ Dqc (Z) to be the
composite isomorphism
(3.4.1)
−−−−→ Ωfd [d] ⊗X f ∗F.
f !F −f
−
→ f ! OZ ⊗X f ∗F −−−−f
−1
χf
vf,id (OZ)⊗ id
X
As before (just after (3.1.2)), the identifications
Ωfd [d] ⊗X f ∗ OZ = Ωfd [d] ⊗X OX = Ωfd [d],
18
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
allow us to consider vf (OZ ) to be a map from f ! OZ to Ωfd [d].
Proposition 3.4.2. If F ∈ D+qc (Z) then vf (F ) = vf, idX (F ).
Proof. Let g : X → Y := X ×Z X be the diagonal map. Set ω := Ωfd [d]
(a perfect complex), and set [A, B] := HomX (A, B) (A, B ∈ D(X)). Let
κ = κX (ω, −, −) be as in (2.6.8), ϑ as in (3.1.3) and γ as in (3.1.6) (the last
two with i := idX ). Since f is essentially smooth, all of these maps are
isomorphisms. By definition (see (3.1.7)), Proposition 3.4 says that the
border of the following diagram (in which ⊗ := ⊗X ) commutes:
f ! OZ ⊗ f ∗F
f ! OZ ⊗ f ∗F
χf
f !F
g! OY ⊗ f ! OZ ⊗ ω ⊗ f ∗F
≃
vf,idX(OZ) ⊗ id
2
≃
1
≃
[ω, f ! OZ ] ⊗ ω ⊗ f ∗F
[ω, f ! OZ ⊗ f ∗F ] ⊗ ω
κ
χf
[ω, f !F ] ⊗ ω
ϑ
≃
ω ⊗ f ∗F
γ −1
κ−1
f ∗ OZ ⊗ ω ⊗ f ∗F
[ω, f ! OZ ] ⊗f ∗F ⊗ ω
≃
3
[ω, OX ] ⊗ f ! OZ ⊗ ω ⊗ f ∗F
κ−1
f ∗F ⊗ ω
≃
κ−1
f ∗ OZ ⊗ f ∗F ⊗ ω
≃
κ−1
4
ϑ
[ω, OX ] ⊗f ! OZ ⊗f ∗F
⊗ω
γ −1
g! OY
⊗ f ! OZ
⊗ f ∗F
χf
[ω, OX
] ⊗ f !F
⊗ω
ϑ
⊗ω
χf
γ −1
g! OY ⊗ f !F ⊗ ω
Commutativity of the unlabeled subdiagrams is straightforward to verify.
Commutativity of 1 follows from the definition (3.1.7) of vf, idX (OZ ).
Commutativity of 2 is essentially the definition of the map κ.
Commutativity of 3 results from Lemma 2.8.
For 4 , it’s enough to have commutativity of the functorial diagram
via χf
g! OY ⊗X f!OZ ⊗X f ∗ −−−−→ g! OY ⊗X f !
via ϑy
yϑ
f ∗,
f ∗ OZ ⊗X f ∗
that expands to the border of the next natural diagram, in which the omitted
subscripts on ⊗ symbols are the obvious ones, and, with reference to the
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
standard fiber square
p
X ×Z X −−−2−→
p1
♦
y
X
19
X
f
y
−−−−→ Z ,
f
β♦ is as in (2.6.7):
via χf
g! OY ⊗ f ! OZ ⊗ f ∗
g! OY ⊗ f !
≃
g ! OY ⊗ g∗ p∗2 (f ! OZ ⊗ f ∗)
5
≃
≃
via χf
g! OY ⊗ g∗ p∗2 f !
≃
via β ♦
6
g! OY
⊗ g ∗ p∗2 f ! OZ
⊗ g ∗ p∗2 f ∗
f
g! OY
⊗ g∗(p∗2 f ! OZ ⊗ p∗2 f ∗)
via β ♦
g! OY ⊗ g ∗ p!1 f ∗OZ ⊗ g∗ p∗2 f ∗
via χg
via χp1
f
χg
≃
9
χp 1 g
≃
χg
via χg
g! (p!1 f ∗ OZ ⊗ p∗1 f ∗ )
8
(p1 g)!f ∗OZ ⊗ (p1 g)∗f ∗
f ∗ OZ ⊗ f ∗
g! OY ⊗ g ∗(p!1 f ∗OZ ⊗ p∗1 f ∗)
7
g! p!1 f ∗ OZ ⊗ g∗ p∗1 f ∗
≃
g! OY ⊗ g ∗ p!1 f ∗
via β ♦
(p1 g)!(f ∗ OZ ⊗ f ∗ )
via χp1
g! p!1 f ∗
≃
(p1 g)! f ∗
≃
f∗
For commutativity of subdiagram 5 , see the last two paragraphs of §3.6
in [L09].
Commutativity of 6 results from [Nm14, 13.7] with applied to the diagram ♦ (cf. [L09, 4.9.3(c)].)
Commutativity of 7 , 8 and 9 are left mostly to the reader (cf. [L09, Exercises 4.7.3.4(a), (d) and (b)], as modified in [L09, 4.9.3(d)], describing the
behavior of χ vis-à-vis associativity of tensor product, composition of maps,
and identity maps, respectively.) For more details on 8 , see [Nm14, 13.4].
Commutativity of the remaining subdiagrams is easy to check, whence
the assertion.
20
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
Remark 3.4.3 (Base change). Let there be given a fiber square in E
g′
X ′ −−−−→
f ′y
X
f
y
Z ′ −−−g−→ Z
in which f (and hence f ′ ) is essentially smooth of relative dimension d.
The isomorphism vf (OZ ) induces an OX -isomorphism
∼
ωf := H −d f ! OZ −→
H −d Ωdf [d] = Ωdf ,
and similarly for f ′ . The resulting composite isomorphism
∼
∼
∼
ωf ′ ,
Ωdf ′ −→
g′∗ ωf −→
g′∗ Ωdf −→
is discussed in [S04, p. 740, Theorem 2.3.5].
The next Proposition expresses compatibility between vf and (derived)
tensor product.
Proposition 3.4.4. For any F1 , F2 ∈ Dqc (Z), the following diagram, where
⊗ := ⊗X , commutes.
vf (F1 )⊗id
f !F1 ⊗ f ∗F2 −−−−−−→ Ωfd [d] ⊗ f ∗F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
χf (F1, F2 )y
ynatural
f ! (F1 ⊗ F2 ) −−−−−−−→ Ωfd [d] ⊗ f ∗(F1 ⊗ F2 ).
vf (F1 ⊗F2 )
Proof (Sketch). The definition of vf makes it enough to prove commutativity of the next diagram (expressing transitivity of χf for any F0 ∈ Dqc (Z)),
and then to take F0 := OZ .
χf (F0, F1)⊗id
f ! (F0 ⊗ F1 ) ⊗ f ∗F2 ←−−−−−−−−− f !F0 ⊗ f ∗F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
χf (F0 ⊗F1, F2)y
ynatural
f ! (F0 ⊗ F1 ⊗ F2 ) ←−−−−−−−−− f !F0 ⊗ f ∗ (F1 ⊗ F2 ).
χf (F0 , F1 ⊗F2)
For this, one reduces easily, via a compactification of f, to the case where
f is proper, a case dealt with (in outline) in [L09, Exercise 4.7.3.4(a)].
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
21
4. The fundamental class
4.1. Let f : X → Z be a flat E-map. Set Y := X ×Z X, let δ : X → Y be
the diagonal map, and pi : Y → X (i = 1, 2) the projections onto the first
and second factors, respectively, so that we have the diagram, with fiber
square ♣ ,
p
δ
(4.1.1)
X −−−−→ Y −−−2−→
p1
♣
y
X
f
y
X −−−−→ Z
f
The maps pi are flat.
There are maps of Dqc -functors
(4.1.2)
µi : δ∗ → p!i
(i = 1, 2)
adjoint, respectively, to the natural maps id = (pi δ)! → δ! p!i . Thus µi is the
natural composite map
δ∗ = δ∗ (pi δ)! −→ δ∗ δ! p!i −→ p!i .
Associated to ♣ is the functorial base-change isomorphism (see (2.6.7))
∼
β = β♣ : p∗2 f !F −→
p!1 f ∗F
(F ∈ Dqc (Z)).
Definition 4.2. With preceding notation, the fundamental class of f,
Cf : δ∗ δ∗ f ∗ → f ! ,
a map between functors from Dqc (Z) to Dqc (X), is given by the composite
δ∗ δ∗ f ∗ −−−→ δ∗ p!1 f ∗ −−f
−−→ f ! .
−−→ δ∗ p∗2 f ! −−f
via µ1
δ∗β −1
natural
Remarks. (Not used elsewhere). It results from [AJL14, 2.5 and 3.1] that
the fundamental class commutes with essentially étale localization on X.
That is, if g : X ′ → X is essentially étale then Cfg is obtained from Cf by
applying the functor g ∗ and then making canonical identifications.
See also [AJL14, Theorem 5.1] for the behavior of Cf under flat base
change.
These results imply that if u : U ֒→ X and v : V ֒→ Z are open immersions
such that f (U ) ⊂ V , and f0 : U → V is the restriction of f , then u∗ (Cf ) can
be identified with Cf . Locally, then, Cf reduces to the fundamental class of
0
a flat E-map of affine schemes, in which case a simple explicit description is
given in [ILN14, Theorem 4.2.4].
The next Proposition expresses compatibility between Cf and (derived)
tensor product.
22
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
Proposition 4.3. For any F1 , F2 ∈ Dqc (Z), the following diagram, where
⊗ := ⊗X , χf is as in (2.6.6) and ψ := ψ(δ, p1 , f ∗F1 , f ∗F2 ), commutes.
δ∗δ∗ f ∗F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
Cf (F1 ) ⊗ id
f !F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
ψ
δ∗δ∗ (f ∗F1 ⊗ f ∗F2 )
χf (F1, F2 )
(2.6.1)
δ∗δ∗ f ∗ (F1 ⊗ F2 )
f ! (F1 ⊗ F2 )
Cf (F1 ⊗ F2 )
Proof. The diagram expands, naturally, as follows, where α is induced by
∼ (f p )∗ = (f p )∗ −→
∼ p∗ f ∗ and by the base-change
the composite p∗2 f ∗ −→
2
1
1
isomorphism β.
δ∗δ∗ f ∗F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
δ∗ p!1 f ∗F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
δ∗ p∗2 f !F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
f !F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
1
δ∗ (p!1 f ∗F1 ⊗ p∗1 f ∗F2 )
2
α
δ∗ (δ∗ f ∗F1 ⊗ p∗1 f ∗F2 )
3
δ∗δ∗ (f ∗F1
⊗
δ ∗ χ p1
δ∗ (p∗2 f !F1 ⊗ p∗2 f ∗F2 )
δ∗ p∗1 f ∗F2 )
δ∗ p∗2 (f !F1 ⊗ f ∗F2 )
f !F1 ⊗ f ∗F2
δ∗ p!1 (f ∗F1 ⊗ f ∗F2 )
4
δ∗δ∗ (f ∗F1 ⊗ f ∗F2 )
δ∗δ∗ f ∗ (F1 ⊗ F2 )
δ∗ p!1 f ∗ (F1 ⊗ F2 )
δ∗p∗2 χf
δ∗ p∗2 f ! (F1 ⊗ F2 )
via χf
f ! (F1 ⊗ F2 )
Commutativity of 1 follows from that of the next diagram of natural
isomorphisms, the commutativity of whose subdiagrams is either obvious or
included in the pseudofunctoriality of (−)∗ :
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
f ∗ = (p1 δ)∗ f ∗
(p2 δ)∗ f ∗ = f ∗
(f p1 δ)∗
(f p2 δ)∗
δ∗ (f p1 )∗
δ∗ (f p2 )∗
δ∗ p∗2 f ∗
δ∗ p∗1 f ∗
Subdiagram
and p := p2 .
2
23
expands, naturally, as follows, with E1 := f !F1 , E2 := f ∗F2
(pδ)∗E1 ⊗ E2
δ∗p∗E1 ⊗ E2
E1 ⊗ E2
5
δ∗p∗E1
⊗
(pδ)∗E2
(pδ)∗E1
⊗
(pδ)∗E2
γ
(pδ)∗ (E1 ⊗ E2 )
6
δ∗p∗E1 ⊗ δ∗p∗E2
δ∗(p∗E1 ⊗ p∗E2 )
δ∗p∗ (E1 ⊗ E2 )
Commutativity of 6 is given by the dual of the commutative diagram [L09,
3.6.7.2] (see proof of [L09, 3.6.10]). As pδ is the identity map of X, the same
diagram, with g = f = id, yields that the isomorphism γ is idempotent,
whence it is the identity map, so that 5 commutes.
Subdiagram 3 without δ∗ expands, naturally, to the following, with
E1 := f ∗F1 , E2 := f ∗F2 , and p := p1 :
δ∗E1 ⊗ p∗E2
δ∗ δ! p!E1 ⊗ p∗E2
p!E1 ⊗ p∗E2
7
δ∗ (δ! p!E1 ⊗ δ∗p∗E2 )
δ∗ χδ
δ∗ δ! (p!E1 ⊗ p∗E2 )
χp
δ∗ (E1 ⊗ δ∗p∗E2 )
δ∗ (pδ)!E1 ⊗ (pδ)∗E2
δ∗ δ! χp
δ∗ δ! p! (E1 ⊗ E2 )
δ∗ (E1 ⊗ E2 )
Commutativity of subdiagram
(δ being proper).
8
7
p! (E1 ⊗ E2 )
is immediate from the definition of χδ
24
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
In [Nm14] there is a blanket convention that the functors and natural
transformations strictly respect identities, hence (pδ)∗ = id∗ = id = id! =
(pδ)! . The commutativity of 8 follows from [Nm14, Theorem 13.4].
Commutativity of subdiagram 4 is given by [Nm14, Proposition 13.7].
Commutativity of all the remaining (unlabeled) subdiagrams is clear.
4.4. Let f : X → Z be a flat E-map. The map f is equidimensional of
relative dimension d if for each x ∈ X that is a generic point of an irreducible
component of the fiber f −1f (x), the transcendence degree of the residue field
of the local ring OX,x over that of OZ,f (x) is d. When f is of finite type, this
just means that every irreducible component of every fiber has dimension d.
An essentially smooth E-map of constant relative dimension d is equidimensional of relative dimension d.
For any equidimensional such f, of relative dimension d, it holds that
H ef ! OZ = 0 whenever e < −d. Indeed, this assertion is local on Z and X
(see the remark right after (1.1.3)). One gets then from [EGA4, 13.3.1]
that f may be assumed to be of the form Spec B → Spec A where B is a
localization of a module-finite quasi-finite algebra B0 over the polynomial
ring A[T1 , . . . , Td ]. By Zariski’s Main Theorem [EGA4, 8.12.6] the map
Spec B0 → Spec A[T1 , . . . , Td ] factors as finite ◦ (open immersion). The isomorphism (3.1.2) shows that the relative dualizing complex for the map
Spec A[T1 , . . . , Td ] → Spec A is concentrated in degree −d, so (1.2.1) implies
that the assertion holds for any map Spec B1 → Spec A with B1 finite over
A[T1 , . . . , Td ], and then by (i) in 1.1, it holds for Spec B → Spec A.
So there is a canonical composite map
(4.4.1)
Ωdf [d] −−−−→ (H −d δ∗δ∗ OX )[d] −−−−→ (H −d f ! OZ )[d] −→ f ! OZ ,
H −d Cf
(3.2.2)
whence a canonical map
∼
cf : Ωdf [d] ⊗ f ∗ −→ f ! OZ ⊗ f ∗ −→
f !.
(2.6.6)
For essentially smooth f there is then an obvious question—the one that
motivated the present paper, and to which the answer is affirmative:
Theorem 4.5. For essentially smooth E-maps f : X → Z of relative dimension d, and F ∈ Dqc (Z), the fundamental class map cf (F ) is inverse to
Verdier’s isomorphism vf (F ).
Proof. As in Section 4.1. set Y := X ×Z X, let δ : X → Y be the diagonal
map, and pi : Y → X (i = 1, 2) the projections onto the first and second
factors, respectively, so that we have the diagram, with fiber square ♣ ,
δ
(4.5.1)
p
X −−−−→ Y −−−2−→
p1
♣
y
X
f
y
X −−−−→ Z
f
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
25
Resolving δ∗ OX locally by a Koszul complex, one sees that H e δ∗δ∗ OX = 0
if e < −d; so one has natural maps
(4.5.2)
ω := Ωdf [d] −−−→ H −d δ∗δ∗ OX [d] −→ δ∗δ∗ OX ,
(3.2.2)
and cf is the composite
χf
ω ⊗ f ∗ −−−−−−→ δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ f ∗ −−−−−−→ f ! OZ ⊗ f ∗ −−−−→ f ! .
(4.5.2)⊗id
Cf (OZ )⊗id
(2.6.6)
In view of Proposition 3.4.4, the theorem says then that the composite
ω ⊗ f ∗ −−−−−−→ δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ f ∗ −−−−−−→ f ! OZ ⊗ f ∗ −−−−−−→ ω ⊗ f ∗
(4.5.2)⊗id
Cf (OZ )⊗id
vf (OZ )⊗id
is the identity map.
(Here we implicitly used commutativity of the diagram of natural isomorphisms
−−→ OX ⊗ f ∗
f ∗ OZ ⊗ f ∗ −−f
≃
≃y
(4.5.3)
y
f ∗ (OX ⊗ id) −−f
−−→
f∗
which commutativity holds since, mutatis mutandis, this diagram is dual [L09, 3.4.5]
to the commutative subdiagram 2 in the proof of [L09, 3.4.7(iii)].)
It suffices therefore to prove Theorem 4.5 when F = OZ .
Let (−)′ be the endofunctor HomX (−, OX ) of D(X). The “mirror image”
of the evaluation map ev(X, E, OX ) (see (2.2.2)) is the natural composite
(4.5.4)
∼
E ⊗ E ′ −→
E ′ ⊗ E −−−→ OX
(2.2.2)
(E ∈ D(X)).
Now, after unwinding of the definitions involved, Theorem 4.5 for F = OZ
states that the border of the next natural diagram commutes. (Going around
clockwise from the upper left corner to the bottom right one gives cf (OZ ),
while going around counterclockwise gives vf (OZ )−1 .)
In this diagram, ⊗ := ⊗X , ψ20 := ψ(δ, p2 , OX , OX )—the identity map
of δ∗δ∗ OX (see 2.9.5), and ψ2 := ψ(δ, p2 , OX , δ! p!1 OX ). Commutativity of
the unlabeled subdiagrams is straightforward to check. The problem is to
show commutativity of 1 .
26
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
OX ⊗ ω
(4.5.2)
ω ⊗ OX
≃
≃
δ! p!1 OX ⊗ ω
≃ (2.6.7)
(4.5.2)
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ δ! p!1 OX
≃ (2.6.6)
≃
ψ2
(3.1.6)
ω ⊗ ω ′ ⊗ δ∗ p!1 OX
(4.5.4)
≃ χ−1
δ
δ∗ p!1 OX
(2.6.7) ≃
δ! OY ⊗ δ∗ p∗2 f ! OZ ⊗ ω
≃ (2.6.7)
δ∗ p∗2 f ! OZ
(2.6.7) ≃
≃
≃
δ∗δ∗ δ! p!1 OX
1
ω ⊗ δ! OY ⊗ δ∗ p!1 OX
δ! p∗2 f ! OZ ⊗ ω
δ∗δ∗ OX
≃
ω ⊗ δ! p!1 OX
f
ψ20
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ OX
(4.5.4)
ω ⊗ δ! OY
⊗ δ∗ p∗2 f ! OZ
(3.1.6)
ω ⊗ ω ′ ⊗ δ∗ p∗2 f ! OZ
≃
≃
δ! OY ⊗ f ! OZ ⊗ ω
f
(3.1.6)
ω ′ ⊗ f !OZ ⊗ ω
f
ω ⊗ ω ′ ⊗ f ! OZ
f
(4.5.4)
f ! OZ
We’ll need another description of the map (3.1.6) (Lemma 4.5.9 below).
For this, begin by checking that the counit map δ∗δ∗ G → G (G ∈ D(X))
has right inverses τp (G), where p : Y → X is any map such that pδ = idX
(e.g., p = p1 or p2 ), and τp (G) is the natural composite
(4.5.5)
∼
∼
G −→
δ∗p∗ G −→
δ∗p∗ p∗ δ∗ G −→ δ∗ δ∗ G,
δ∗ υ(G)
∼ δ ∗p∗ G −−−−→ δ ∗ δ G, where
that is, the composite G −→
∗
υ : p∗ → δ∗
(4.5.6)
∼ p δ .
is the map adjoint to id −→
∗ ∗
Let ρ 0 be the natural composite (of isomorphisms, since δ∗ OX is perfect)
δ∗δ∗ δ! OY −−−−→ δ∗ HomY (δ∗ OX , OY ) −−−−→ (δ∗δ∗ OX )′ ,
(1.2.1)
(2.6.4)
and set
(4.5.7)
ρ = ρp := ρ 0 τp (δ! OY ) : δ! OY −→ (δ∗δ∗ OX )′ .
As noted just before (3.2.7), H e (δ! OY ) = 0 for any e 6= d, whence the
counit map δ∗δ∗ δ! OY → δ! OY is taken to an isomorphism by the functor H d .
The inverse of this isomorphism is H d τp (δ! OY ) because τp (δ! OY ) is rightinverse to δ∗δ∗ δ! OY → δ! OY . It follows then from its description via (3.2.6)
that (3.2.8), with U = X, W = Y and n = d, is the natural composite
δ! OY ∼
= H d (δ! OY ) [−d]
(4.5.8)
H d (ρ)[−d]
∼
−−−−−−→ H d ((δ∗δ∗ OX )′ ) [−d] −→
(Ωfd )′ [−d],
the last isomorphism arising via (3.2.5) (with n = d) and (4.5.2).
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
27
Lemma 4.5.9. For any ρ = ρp as in (4.5.7), the map (3.1.6) factors as
via (4.5.2)
ρ
δ! OY −−→ (δ∗δ∗ OX )′ −−−−−−→ ω ′ .
Proof. For any complex E ∈ D(X) set E ≥d := t≥d E, with t≥d the truncation
functor (denoted τ≥d in [L09, § 10.1]). The natural map H d (E)[−d] → E ≥d
is an isomorphism if H e E = 0 for all e > d, a condition satisfied when
E = (δ∗ δ∗ OX )′ or ω ′ .
Accordingly, and in view of the description of (3.1.6) via (3.2.8) = (4.5.8),
the lemma asserts that the border of the following diagram, whose top row
is (4.5.8), commutes.
≥d
(Ωfd )′ [−d]
(δ! OY )≥d
δ! OY
(δ∗δ∗ OX )′
via (4.5.2)
ρ
(ω ′ )≥d
(δ∗δ∗ OX )′
2
(3.1.5)
ω′
via (4.5.2)
The unlabeled subdiagrams clearly commute. Subdiagram
naturally as follows, with Hom = HomX :
H d (δ∗δ∗ OX )′ [−d]
≃
expands
(H −d δ∗δ∗ OX )′ [−d]
cf. (4.5.2)
(Ωfd )′ [−d]
≥d
(δ∗δ∗ OX )′
(H −d δ∗δ∗ OX [d])′
(3.2.5)
2
≥d
(3.1.5)
via (4.5.2)
(ω ′ )≥d
ω′
The vertices of this diagram can all be identified with the complex G that
is H 0 Hom(Ωfd , OX ) in degree d and 0 elsewhere. When this is done, all the
maps in the diagram are identity maps except for the two labeled (3.2.5)
and (3.1.5), which are both multiplication in G by (−1)d(d+1)/2 . (See the
remarks following equations (3.2.5) and (3.1.5)). Hence subdiagram 2 com
mutes, and Lemma 4.5.9 is proved.
28
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
One has now that subdiagram 1 without p!1 OX expands naturally as
follows, with χ as in (2.6.6), id the identity functor, and
ψ3 := ψ(δ, p2 , OX , δ! OY ⊗Y δ∗ (−)),
ψ4 := ψ(δ, p2 , δ! OY , δ∗ (−)),
ψ7 := ψ(δ, p2 , OX , δ! OY ).
ω ⊗ δ!
(4.5.2)
ψ2
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ δ!
χ−1
δ
χ−1
δ
χ−1
δ
ω ⊗ δ! OY ⊗ δ∗
(4.5.2)
δ∗δ∗ δ!
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ δ! OY ⊗ δ∗
ψ3
δ∗δ∗ (δ! OY ⊗Y δ∗ )
3
ψ7 ⊗ id
via ρ
(2.6.3)−1
ψ4
4
δ∗δ∗ δ! OY
via ρ
⊗ δ∗
(2.6.1)
δ∗ (δ∗ δ! OY ⊗Y id)
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ (δ∗δ∗ OX )′ ⊗ δ∗
7
(4.5.2)
δ∗ OY ⊗ δ∗
ω ⊗ (δ∗δ∗ OX )′ ⊗ δ∗
ω ⊗ ω ′ ⊗ δ∗
(2.6.1)
δ∗ (OY ⊗Y id)
(4.5.4)
6
(4.5.4)
8
OX ⊗ δ∗
f
(4.5.2)
5
f
δ∗
Commutativity of the unlabeled subdiagrams is clear;
Commutativity of 3 is given by Lemma 2.9.4.
Commutativity of 5 (without δ∗ ) is the definition of χδ = χδ (OY , −).
Commutativityof 6 is given by that of the first diagram in [L09, 3.5.3(h)],
with (A, B, C) := (δ∗δ∗ OX , ω, OX ).
For commutativity of 8 , cf. (4.5.3).
After restoring the term p!1 OX ∼
= p∗2 f ! OZ omitted above, one gets commutativity of 4 from Lemma 2.9.2, with E := δ! OY , F := f ! OZ .
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
29
That leaves subdiagram 7 , which without “ ⊗ δ∗ ” expands naturally as
follows, where p := p2 and F ′′ := HomY (F, OY ) (F ∈ D(Y )):
(2.6.1)
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ δ! OY
via τp (δ!OY )
δ∗(δ∗ OX ⊗ p∗δ! OY )
via (1.2.1)
≃
δ∗ (δ∗ OX ⊗ δ∗ δ! OY )
(2.6.1)
(2.6.1)
δ∗δ∗ δ∗p∗ δ! OY
7 4
via (1.2.1)
7 2
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ δ∗ (δ∗ OX )′′
δ∗ δ∗ OX ⊗ (δ∗ OX )′′
δ∗δ∗ δ! OY
cf.(4.5.4)
OX
(4.5.4)
≃
7 3
via (2.6.4)
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ (δ∗δ∗ OX )′
δ∗δ∗ (OX ⊗ δ∗p∗δ! OY )
via (4.5.6)
7 1
δ∗δ∗ OX ⊗ δ∗δ∗ δ! OY
(2.6.3)
δ∗ OY
f
Commutativity of subdiagram 7 1 results from the definition of τp .
Commutativity of subdiagram 7 2 is clear.
Commutativity of 7 3 follows from [L09, 3.5.6(a)] (with f := δ, A := δ∗ OX
and B := OY ).
Subdiagram 7 4 , with the initial “δ∗ ” in each term dropped, expands
naturally as follows:
(2.6.3)
δ∗ OX ⊗ p∗ δ! OY
δ∗ (OX ⊗ δ∗p∗ δ! OY )
via (4.5.6)
via (4.5.6)
(2.6.3)
δ∗ OX ⊗ δ∗ δ! OY
≃
δ∗ (OX ⊗ δ∗δ∗ δ! OY )
≃
7 41
(2.2.1)
7 42
δ∗ δ∗p∗ δ! OY
δ∗ OX ⊗ δ∗ δ∗δ∗ δ! OY
≃
(2.2.1)
δ∗ OX ⊗ δ∗ δ! OY
δ∗ (OX ⊗ δ! OY )
f
δ∗ δ! OY
7 43
via (1.2.1)
δ∗ δ! OY ⊗ δ∗ OX
ζ(OX , OY ) ⊗ id
δ∗ OX ⊗ (δ∗ OX )′′
f
(2.2.1)
δ∗ (δ! OY ⊗ OX )
see (2.6.5)
(δ∗ OX )′′ ⊗ δ∗ OX
7 44
(2.2.2)
OY
Here, commutativity of the unlabeled subdiagrams is clear.
The commutativity of subdiagram 7 41 is given by the definition of the
projection isomorphism (2.6.3).
30
J. LIPMAN AND A. NEEMAN
Commutativity of subdiagram 7 42 (which says, incidentally, that the
∼
id) follows
map υ in (4.5.6) is adjoint to the natural isomorphism δ∗ p∗ −→
easily from τp in (4.5.5) being right inverse to the counit map δ∗ δ∗ G → G.
Subdiagram 7 43 commutes because δ∗ is a symmetric monoidal functor.
(See §2.2.)
Finally, commutativity of subdiagram 7 44 means that the map ζ(OX , OY )
is adjoint to the natural composite
(4.5.10)
(2.2.1)
δ∗ δ! OY ⊗Y δ∗ OX −−−−→ δ∗ (δ! OY ⊗X OX ) = δ∗ δ! OY −→ OY .
But for any F ∈ Dqc (Y ), ζ(OX , F ) is, by definition, right-conjugate to the
projection isomorphism
(4.5.11)
∼
δ∗ δ∗G = δ∗ (δ∗G ⊗X OX ) ←−
G ⊗Y δ∗ OX ,
(2.6.3)
that is (see [L09, 3.3.5]), ζ(OX , F ) is adjoint to the natural composite
∼
δ∗ δ! F ⊗Y δ∗ OX −→
δ∗ δ∗δ∗ δ! F −→ δ∗ δ! F −→ F,
(4.5.11)
which for F := OY is the same as (4.5.10), since for any A and B ∈ D(X)
(e.g., A = δ! OY and B = OX ), the following natural diagram commutes (as
follows easily from the definition of (2.6.3)):
δ∗ A ⊗Y δ∗ B
(2.2.1)
δ∗ (A ⊗X B)
(2.6.3)
δ∗ δ∗δ∗ A ⊗Y δ∗ B
δ∗ (δ∗ δ∗A ⊗X B)
(2.2.1)
So subdiagram 7 44 commutes.
Thus, 7 commutes, whence so does
1
.
5. Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Pramathanath Sastry for a number of comments from
which this paper benefited.
References
[AJL11] L. Alonso Tarrı́o, A. Jeremı́as López, J. Lipman, Bivariance, Grothendieck duality and Hochschild homology I: Construction of a bivariant theory. Asian J.
Math., 15 (2011), 451–497. 2, 7
[AJL14]
, Bivariance, Grothendieck duality and Hochschild homology II: the fundamental class of a flat scheme-map. Advances in Math., 257 (2014), 365–461. 3,
4, 9, 21
[B07]
N. Bourbaki, Algèbre, Chapitre 10. Algèbre homologique. Springer-Verlag, BerlinNew York, 2007. 14
[C00]
B. Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change, Lecture Notes in Math. 1750,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 2000. 2, 3, 12, 14, 15
[C01]
, Clarifications and corrections for Grothendieck duality and base change,
http://math.stanford.edu/~conrad/ 2
FUNDAMENTAL CLASS OF AN ESSENTIALLY SMOOTH SCHEME-MAP
31
[EGA4] A. Grothendieck, J. Dieudonné, Eléments de Géométrie Algébrique IV, Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes of schémas. Publications Mathématiques,
20, 24, 28, 32, Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, Paris, 1961–1967. 5, 24
[G60] A. Grothendieck, The cohomology theory of abstract algebraic varieties, Proc. Internat. Congress Math. (Edinburgh 1958). Cambridge University Press, New York,
1960, 103–118. 4
[H66] R. Hartshorne, Residues and Duality. Lecture Notes in Math., 20. SpringerVerlag, Berlin-New York, 1966. 2, 4, 6, 12, 15
[HS93] Hübl, R.; Sastry, P.: Regular differential forms and relative duality. Amer. J.
Math. 115 (1993), no. 4, 749–787. 4
[I71]
L. Illusie, Conditions de finitude relative, Théorie des Intersections et Théorème
de Riemann-Roch (SGA 6). Lecture Notes in Math. 225, Springer-Verlag, BerlinNew York, 1971, 222–273. 5
[ILN14] S. B. Iyengar, J. Lipman, A. Neeman, Relation between two twisted inverse image pseudofunctors in duality theory. Compositio Mathematica, to appear.
arXiv:1307.7092. 6, 21
[KM71] G. M. Kelly, S. Mac Lane, Coherence in closed categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra,
1 (1971), 97–140. 9
[L84]
J. Lipman, Dualizing sheaves, differentials and residues on algebraic varieties.
Astérisque 117 (1984). 4
[L01]
, Lectures on local cohomology and duality. Local Cohomology and Its
Applications, ed. G. Lyubeznik, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001, 39-89. 4
[L09]
, Notes on derived categories and Grothendieck Duality. Foundations of
Grothendieck duality for diagrams of schemes. Lecture Notes in Math., 1960,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 2009, 1–259. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 17, 19,
20, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30
[LS81]
, A. Sathaye, Jacobian ideals and a theorem of Briançon-Skoda. Michigan
Math. J., 28 (1981), 199–222. 13
[Nk09] S. Nayak, Compactification for essentially finite type maps. Adv. Math. 222,
(2009), 527–546. 2, 7
[Nm14] A. Neeman, An improvement on the base-change theorem and the functor f ! ,
preprint.
[S04]
P. Sastry, Base change and Grothendieck duality for Cohen-Macaulay maps. Compositio Math., 140 (2004), 729–777. 2, 7, 17, 19, 24
[V68] J.-L. Verdier, Base change for twisted inverse image of coherent sheaves. Algebraic
Geometry (Bombay, 1968). Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1969; 393–408. 3, 20
3, 11, 15
142 Ranch Ln., Santa Barbara CA 93111, U.S.A.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Centre for Mathematics and its Applications, Mathematical Sciences
Institute, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Virtual vs. Real: Trading Off Simulations and Physical Experiments
in Reinforcement Learning with Bayesian Optimization
arXiv:1703.01250v1 [cs.RO] 3 Mar 2017
Alonso Marco1,5 , Felix Berkenkamp2,5 , Philipp Hennig1,5 , Angela P. Schoellig3 ,
Andreas Krause2,5 , Stefan Schaal1,4,5 , and Sebastian Trimpe1,5
Abstract— In practice, the parameters of control policies are
often tuned manually. This is time-consuming and frustrating.
Reinforcement learning is a promising alternative that aims to
automate this process, yet often requires too many experiments
to be practical. In this paper, we propose a solution to this
problem by exploiting prior knowledge from simulations, which
are readily available for most robotic platforms. Specifically,
we extend Entropy Search, a Bayesian optimization algorithm
that maximizes information gain from each experiment, to
the case of multiple information sources. The result is a
principled way to automatically combine cheap, but inaccurate
information from simulations with expensive and accurate
physical experiments in a cost-effective manner. We apply the
resulting method to a cart-pole system, which confirms that the
algorithm can find good control policies with fewer experiments
than standard Bayesian optimization on the physical system
only.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Typically, the control policies that are used in robotics
depend on a small set of tuning parameters. To achieve
the best performance on the real system, these parameters
are usually tuned manually in experiments on the physical
platform. Policy search methods in reinforcement learning
aim to automate this process [1]. However, without prior
knowledge, these methods can require significant amounts of
experimental time before determining optimal, or even only
reasonable parameters. In robotics, simulation models of the
robotic system are usually available, e.g., as a by-product
of the design process. While exploiting knowledge from
simulation models has been considered before, no principled
way to trade off between the relative costs and accuracies
of simulations and experiments exists [2]. As a result,
state-of-the-art reinforcement learning methods require more
experimental time on the real system than necessary.
In this paper, we propose a new reinforcement learning
method that can automatically optimize the parameters of
1 Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Email: <firstname>.<lastname>@tuebingen.mpg.de
2 Learning & Adaptive Systems Group (LAS), Department of Computer
Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. Email: {befelix, krausea}@ethz.ch
3 Dynamic Systems Lab (DSL), University of Toronto Institute for
Aerospace Studies (UTIAS), Canada. Email: [email protected]
4 Computational Learning and Motor Control Lab, University of Southern
California, USA.
5 Max Planck ETH Center for Learning Systems, Tübingen, Germany,
and Zürich, Switzerland.
This research was supported in part by the Max Planck ETH Center for
Learning Systems, the Max Planck Society, SNSF grant 200020 159557,
NSERC grant RGPIN-2014-04634, the Connaught New Researcher Award,
and National Science Foundation grants IIS-1205249, IIS-1017134, EECS0926052, the Office of Naval Research, the Okawa Foundation
Fig. 1. The proposed algorithm optimizes the parameters θ of a control
policy based on data of a cheap, but inaccurate simulation and expensive
data from the real system. By actively trading off between the information
that can be gained from each system relative to their costs, the algorithm
requires significantly fewer evaluations on the physical system.
control policies based on data from different information
sources, such as simulations and experiments. Specifically,
we use an extension of Entropy Search [3], [4], a Bayesian
optimization framework for information-efficient global optimization. The resulting method automatically trades off the
amount of information gained from different sources with
their respective costs and requires fewer physical experiments to determine optimal parameters (see Fig. 1).
Related work: Improving the performance of reinforcement learning with prior model information from a simulator
has been considered before. A typical approach is twostage learning, where algorithms are trained for a certain
amount of time in simulation in order to warm-start the
learning on the real robot [2]. For example, [5] reports
performance improvements when using model information
from simulation as a prior for real experiments. Transfer
learning is a similar approach that aims to generalize between
different tasks, rather than from a simulated model to the
real system [6]. The work in [7] learns an optimal policy
and value function of a finite Markov decision process
based on models with different accuracies. They rely on
hierarchical models and switch to higher accuracy models
once a threshold accuracy has been reached at a lower level.
A commonly used reinforcement learning method is policy
gradients [8], where policy parameters are improved locally
along the gradient. In this setting, simulation knowledge can
be used to estimate the gradient of real experiments [9].
However, policy gradient methods only converge to locally
optimal parameters. None of the above methods explicitly
considers the cost of experiments on a robot. In this paper,
we actively trade off the different costs and information gains
associated with simulation and real experiments and obtain
Accepted final version. To appear in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
c 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including
reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of
any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
globally optimal parameter estimates.
A method that has been particularly successful for parameter optimization in robotics is Bayesian optimization [10].
In particular, methods based on Gaussian process (GP, [11])
models are widely used because of their ability to determine globally optimal parameters within few evaluations.
Examples include gait optimization in legged robots [12]
and controller optimization for a snake-like robot [13].
In [14], the controller parameters of a linear state-feedback
controller were optimized using the LQR framework as a
low-dimensional representation of controller policies, while
in [15] the control policy itself was defined by Bayesian optimization with a specifically chosen kernel. Safety constraints
on the robot during the optimization process were considered in [16]. A comparison of different Bayesian and nonBayesian global optimization methods can be found in [17].
All the previous methods use Bayesian optimization directly
on the real system. In contrast, we consider an extension of
Bayesian optimization that can extract additional information
from a simulator and speed up the optimization process.
The methodology herein is related to multi-task Bayesian
optimization, where one aims to transfer knowledge about
two related tasks [18], [19]. A GP model with multiple
information sources was first considered in [20]. Since then,
optimization with multiple information sources has been
considered under strict requirements, such as models forming
a hierarchy of increasing accuracy and without considering
different costs [21], [22]. More recently, [23] used a myopic
policy, called the ‘knowledge gradient’ by [24], in order
determine, which parameters to evaluate.
Our contribution: In this paper, we present a Bayesian
optimization algorithm for multiple information sources. We
use entropy [3], [4] to measure the information content of
simulations and experiments. Since this is an appropriate unit
of measure for the utility of both sources, our algorithm
is able to compare physically meaningful quantities in the
same units on either side, and trade off accuracy for cost.
As a result, the algorithm can automatically decide whether
to evaluate cheap, but inaccurate simulations or perform
expensive and precise real experiments. We apply the method
to optimize the policy of a cart-pole system and show that
this approach can speed up the optimization process significantly compared to standard Bayesian optimization [14]. The
main contributions of the paper are (i) a novel Bayesian
optimization algorithm that can trade off between costs of
multiple information sources and (ii) the first application of
such a framework to the problem of reinforcement learning
and optimization of controller parameters.
For convenience within the next sections, we rename
the concepts accuracy and cost: We now refer to the lack
of accuracy of a controller as cost. Furthermore, we now
denominate the cost of retrieving an evaluation from a
specific information source as effort.
II. P ROBLEM S TATEMENT
We consider a reinforcement learning setting, where we
aim to find an optimal policy to complete a certain task
on a dynamic system. While we do not have access to
a perfect model of the system, we assume that a control
policy is available, which is parameterized by parameters θ
within some domain D. The goal is to determine the optimal
parameters θ min that globally minimize the cost of a task,
θ min ∈ argmin J(θ).
(1)
θ∈D
The cost J(θ) measures the performance of the policy on a
certain task on the real system. For example, one evaluation
of the cost function could consist of controlling a robot with
the parameterized policy and measuring an error signal over a
fixed time horizon. To solve the optimization problem in (1),
we can query a parameter vector θ n at each iteration n
and observe the resulting performance J(θ n ). Since these
experiments cause wear in the robot and take time, the goal
is to minimize the number of iterations before the optimal
parameters in (1) are determined.
We assume that a simulation of the system is available,
which we want to exploit to solve (1) more efficiently with
fewer evaluations on the physical system. While simulations
are only an approximation of the real world and cannot be
used to determine the optimal parameters in (1) directly,
they can be used to provide an estimate Jsim (θ) of the true
cost. We use this estimate to obtain information about the
location of the optimal parameters on the real system. As a
result, at each iteration n, we do not only choose the next
parameters θ n to evaluate, but also whether to perform a
simulation or an experiment.
Both experiments, in the real world and in simulation,
have physically meaningful evaluation efforts associated to
them. For example, the effort may account for the amount of
time required to complete an experiment/simulation and for
monetary costs such as wear in the system. The overall goal
is to minimize the total effort incurred in the experiments
and simulations until the optimal parameters (1) on the real
system are found.
III. P RELIMINARIES
We start by introducing the necessary background information on GPs and Bayesian optimization.
A. Gaussian Processes (GPs)
While the cost J(θ) in (1) can easily be evaluated in an experiment for a given parameter θ, the functional relationship
between parameters and the cost is unknown a priori. We use
GPs as a nonparametric model to approximate the unknown
function. The goal is to find an approximation of the nonlinear map, J(θ) : D 7→ R, from an input vector θ ∈ D to
the function value J(θ). This is accomplished by modeling
function values J(θ), associated with different values of θ, as
random variables so that any finite number of these random
variables have a joint Gaussian distribution [11].
For the nonparametric regression, we define a prior mean
function m(θ), which encodes prior knowledge about the
function J(·), and a covariance function k(θ, θ 0 ), which
defines the covariance of any two function values, J(θ)
and J(θ 0 ), θ, θ 0 ∈ D, and is used to model uncertainty about
the mean estimate. The latter is also known as the kernel.
The choice of kernel is problem-dependent and encodes
assumptions about smoothness and rate of change of the
unknown function, J(·).
The GP framework can be used to predict the function
value J(θ ∗ ) at an arbitrary input θ ∗ ∈ D, based on a set
ˆ i )}n . We assume that
of n past observations Dn = {θ i , J(θ
i=1
observations are noisy measurements of the true function;
that is,
ˆ
J(θ)
= J(θ) + ω(θ),
(2)
where the noise ω(θ) ∼ N (0, η 2 (θ)) depends on the input.
Conditioned on the previous observations, the mean and
variance of the posterior normal distribution are
µn (θ ∗ ) = m(θ ∗ ) + kn (θ ∗ )K−1
n ŷn ,
(3)
T ∗
σn2 (θ ∗ ) = k(θ ∗ , θ ∗ ) − kn (θ ∗ )K−1
n kn (θ ),
(4)
ˆ 1 ) − m(θ 1 ), . . . , J(θ
ˆ n ) − m(θ n ) T is the
where ŷn = J(θ
vector of observed,
noisy deviations from
the mean, the
vector kn (a∗ ) = k(θ ∗ , θ 1 ), . . . , k(θ ∗ , θ n ) contains the covariances between the new input θ ∗ and the observed data
points in Dn , and the symmetric matrix Kn ∈ Rn×n has
entries [Kn ](i,j) = k(θ i , θ j ) + δij η 2 (θ i ), i, j ∈ {1, . . . , n}.
B. Bayesian Optimization
We want to use the GP model of the cost function
for parameter optimization. Using statistical models of an
objective function for optimization is known as Bayesian
optimization [10] in the literature. It comprises a class of
data-efficient optimization methods that aim to determine
the global optimum of cost functions that are expensive
to evaluate. In our case, each evaluation of the cost with
certain controller parameters on the robot cause wear in the
system and may take a long time to perform. In the case
of GP models, the mean, (3), and variance, (4) can be used
to determine new parameters to evaluate that are promising
candidates for the global optimum. For example, [25] uses
upper confidence bounds that allow for provable convergence
guarantees.
In this paper, we build upon the Entropy Search (ES, [3])
algorithm, which selects parameters in order to maximally
reduce the uncertainty about the location of the minimum
of J(θ) in each step. It quantifies this uncertainty through the
entropy of the distribution over the location of the minimum,
pmin (θ) = P θ ∈ argmin J(θ) .
(5)
θ∈D
The approach becomes tractable by approximating pmin on
a non-uniform grid, with higher resolution in areas where it
is more likely to find the minimum. The key idea is that,
upon convergence, we expect pmin to be peaked around the
minima, thus to have low entropy. The rate of change in
the entropy of pmin determines how much information about
the location of the global minimum we obtain with each
evaluation of the cost function. Given this metric, the optimal
parameter at which to evaluate the cost function in the next
iteration, is the one that is most informative:
θ n+1 = argmax E [∆H(θ)] ,
(6)
θ∈D
where ∆H(θ) is the change in entropy of pmin caused by
retrieving a new cost value at location θ. Intuitively, by
collecting cost values at the most informative locations (6),
we keep decreasing the amount of entropy in pmin until
eventually pmin is peaked around the optima. At iteration n,
we compute the best guess θ bg about the optimal parameters
by minimizing the current GP posterior (3):
θ bg = argmin µn (θ).
(7)
θ∈D
The computation of ∆H given the GP model of J(·)
requires several approximations. A full derivation is beyond
the scope of the paper, but all details can be found in [3].
IV. R EINFORCEMENT L EARNING WITH S IMULATIONS
In this section, we show how the ES algorithm can be
extended to multiple sources of information, such as simulations and physical experiments. The two main challenges
are modeling the errors of the simulator in a principled way
and trading off evaluation effort and information gain. In the
following, we focus on the case where only one simulation is
available for ease of exposition. However, the approach can
easily be extended to an arbitrary number of information
sources.
A. GP Model for Multiple Information Sources
To model the choice between simulation and phisical experiment, we use a specific kernel structure that is similar to
the one used in [23]. The key idea is to model the cost on the
real system as being partly explained through the simulator
plus some error term. That is, J(θ) = Jsim (θ) + Jerr (θ),
where the true cost consists of the estimated cost of the
simulation, Jsim (θ), and a systematic error term, Jerr (θ).
To incorporate this in the GP framework of Sec. III-A,
we extend the parameter vector by an additional binary
variable δ, which indicates whether the cost is evaluated in
simulation (δ = 0) or on the physical system (δ = 1). Based
on the extended parameter a = (θ, δ), we can model the cost
by adapting the GP kernel to
k(a, a0 ) = ksim (θ, θ 0 ) + kδ (δ, δ 0 ) kerr (θ, θ 0 ).
(8)
The kernels ksim (·, ·) and kerr (·, ·) model the cost function
on the simulator and its difference to the cost on the physical
system, respectively. The kernel kδ (δ, δ 0 ) = δδ 0 is equal to
one if both parameters indicate a physical experiment and
zero otherwise.
From Sec. III-A, we know that the kernel (8) models
the covariances for different parameters. Intuitively, the kernel (8) encodes that two experiments on the physical system
covary strongly. However, if one of the δ-variables is zero
(i.e., a simulation), then the only covariances between the two
values is captured by ksim . Effectively, the error covariance is
switched off in simulations in order to model that simulations
J( )
2
according to (3) and (4).
B. Optimization
0
H]
-2
10 -3
4
E[
2
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
a: Exploration stage after two evaluations
J( )
2
With the GP model defined, we now consider how it can
be used to trade off accuracy for evaluation effort. As a first
step, we quantify the goal. As before, we want to minimize
the cost (1) on the real system. This means, the distribution
over the minimum is defined in terms of the same cost (5)
as in standard ES. In order to approximate pmin , we need to
use the GP kernel with the additional δ factor fixed to one,
pmin (θ) = P θ ∈ argmin J(θ, δ) .
(9)
θ∈D, δ=1
0
H]
-2
10 -3
4
E[
2
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
b: Exploration stage after ten evaluations
Fig. 2. Synthetic example of how simulations and physical experiments
can be combined by trading off information and evaluation effort. In (a),
top, it is shown the GP posterior conditioned on one simulation (blue dot)
and one physical experiment (red dot). The GP model from Sec. IV-A
encodes that a portion of the uncertainty in the cost of the real system
(red shaded) can be explained through the simulator (blue shaded). The
red dashed line represents the cost function of the physical system. The
cost function of the simulator is omitted for simplicity. In (a), bottom, it
is shown the expected information gain per unit of effort of the simulator
(blue line), and of the physical system (red line). The most informative point
(blue dot) is selected among the two sources by the proposed method as
next evaluation (in this case, a simulation). In (b), top, it is shown the GP
posterior after nine iterations. The global minimum (orange dot) is found
close to the true minimum.
cannot provide all the information about J. By choosing the
kernels ksim and kerr , we can model to what extend J can
be explained by the simulator and thereby its quality. This
is illustrated with a synthetic example in Fig. 2. The total
variance of the cost on the physical system is shown in red.
Before any data is observed, it is equal to the uncertainty
about the simulation plus the uncertainty about the error.
As shown in Fig. 2a, the blue shaded region highlights the
variance of the simulator. Evaluations in simulation (blue
dots) reduce the uncertainty of this blue shaded region, but
reduce only partially the uncertainty about the true cost
(red). In contrast, an evaluation on the real system (red dot)
allows one to learn the true cost J directly, thus reducing
the total uncertainty (red), while some uncertainty about the
variance of Jsim remains (blue). Having uncertainty about
the simulation is by itself irrelevant for the proposed method,
because we solely aim to minimize the performance on the
physical system.
Next to the kernel, we account for different amounts of
noise in simulation (typically noise-free) and on the real
system. That is, the noise variance of measurements, η 2 (a)
2
2
in (2), takes different values, ηexp
and ηsim
, depending on
whether an experiment or a simulation is chosen. With this
kernel and noise structure, the two information sources can
be modeled by a single GP, and predictions can be made
As in ES, the goal is to arrive at a distribution pmin that
has low entropy (i.e., very peaked on a certain location).
The expected change in entropy is an appropriate measure
for this. However, this quantity additionally depends on the
variable δ, so that the algorithm has an additional degree of
freedom in the parameters to optimize. If one were to use
the same optimization problem as in (6), the algorithm would
always choose to evaluate parameters with δ = 1. This is because the experiments with δ = 1 provide information about
the cost function J directly, while an evaluation with δ = 0
only provides information about part of the cost, Jsim .
To trade off between the two choices more appropriately,
we associate an effort measure with both kinds of evaluations; tsim for the simulation and texp for physical experiments. While simulations are less informative about pmin ,
they are significantly cheaper than experiments on a physical
platform so that tsim < texp . These effort measures can have
physically meaningful units, such as the amount of time
taken by a simulation relative to a physical experiment.
While the effort measures are important to trade off the
relative gains in information, they do not require tuning.
For example, setting the effort of the simulator too high
may lead to more experiments on the physical system than
necessary, but the optimal parameters on the real system are
found regardless.
A key advantage of using entropy to determine progress
towards the goal is that it is a consistent unit of measurement
for both information sources, even in the case of different
noise variances. As a result, we can compare the gain in
information about the location of the minimum (i.e., pmin ) in
simulation and physical experiments relative to their efforts.
Thus, we select the next parameters, θ n+1 , and where to
evaluate them, δ, according to
argmax
E [∆Hi (θ)] / ti .
(10)
θ∈D, i∈{sim,exp}
The expected gain in entropy, E [∆Hi ], depends on whether
we evaluate in simulation or physical experiment. By selecting the best gain per unit of effort, the algorithm automatically decides which kind of evaluation decreases the
uncertainty about the location of the minimum the most,
relative to effort. Importantly, since the GP model in (8)
is adaptive to the quality of the simulator, the acquisition
function (10) leads to informed decisions about whether the
simulator is reliable enough to lead to additional information.
We illustrate a typical run of the algorithm in Fig. 2.
The algorithm was initialized with one physical experiment
(red dot in Fig. 2a) for the purpose of illustration. The
evaluation effort of the simulator was set to 40% less of
that of the real system. As a result, it is advantageous to
exploit initially the low effort that takes to do simulations.
The algorithm automatically decides to do so, as can be seen
in Fig. 2a. The simulation (blue dot) decreases the amount
of uncertainty about the simulation model, but provides only
partial information about the true cost of the system. As a
result, the method eventually starts to evaluate parameters
on the real system. Notice that this is not the same as two
stage learning, because the algorithm can decide to switch
back to simulations if this is beneficial. This is especially
important in situations where the quality of the simulation is
not known in advance and the hyperparameters of the kernels
in (8) are optimized. Eventually, the algorithm converges to
a distribution pmin that is peaked around the minima of the
cost function. Since the model can exploit cheap information
from simulation, fewer physical experiments are needed to
determine the minimum than if only physical experiments
were used.
Because the proposed method extends Entropy Search
(ES) to multiple information sources, we refer to it as Multifidelity Entropy Search (MF-ES).
V. E XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS
In this section, we evaluate MF-ES for optimizing the
feedback controller of an unstable cart-pole system, as illustrated in Fig. 1.
A. Experimental Setup
As experimental setup, we use the Quanser Linear Inverted
Pendulum, [26]. The dynamics of the system are described
by
xk+1 = f (xk , uk ),
(11)
where xk = [sk , ψk , ṡk , ψ̇k ]T is the state at discrete time
step k, which is comprised of pendulum angle ψ, cart
position s, and their time derivatives; uk is the commanded
motor voltage driving the cart; and f (·) is the transition
function (see [26] for details).
The cart-pole setup is connected through dedicated hardware to a standard Laptop and can be controlled via Matlab/Simulink. A nonlinear Simulink model of the system
dynamics (11) is provided by the manufacturer and used as
the simulator in our setting.
B. Controller Tuning Problem
To stabilize the pendulum about its upright equilibrium,
we use a static state-feedback controller,
uk = Fxk ,
(12)
with gain matrix F ∈ R1×4 . We seek optimal gains F that
minimize the cost function
K−1
1 X 2
sk + ψk2 + ṡ2k + 0.1ψ̇k2 + 10−1.5 u2k
J=
K
k=0
(13)
over a sufficiently long time horizon K. The cost (13)
penalizes deviations from the equilibrium x = 0 and control
effort (u2k ).
Instead of tuning the controllers gains F directly (i.e.
setting θ = F), we follow the approach from [14], [27], and
pre-structure suitable controllers gains by means of a Linear
Quadratic Regulator (LQR, [28]) design using a nominal,
linearized version, (A, B), of the dynamics in (11), around
the aforementioned equilibrium, which can be obtained from
the simulator, for example. That is, the controller gain is
computed from a discrete-time LQR design,
F = dlqr(A, B, Wx (θ), Wu (θ)),
(14)
where Wx (θ) and Wu (θ) are suitable parameterizations of
LQR weights (see [14], [27] for details). Here, we selected
Wx (θ) = diag(10θ1 , 1, 1, 0.1),
−θ2
Wu (θ) = 10
,
θ1 ∈ [−3, 2],
(15)
θ2 ∈ [1, 5].
(16)
Hence, we are left with tuning two parameters, θ ∈ R2 .
Advantages of the LQR parameterization in (14) are
the possibility of dimensionality reduction, exploitation of
prior knowledge in form of a linear dynamics model, and
guarantees of stability and certain robustness properties with
respect to the nominal system (see [14] for a discussion).
However, we emphasize that LQR-weights are only one possible way to parameterize feedback controllers; alternative
parameterizations [29] or direct tuning of the gains F [16]
is also possible. The method proposed herein is independent
of the specific parameterization used.
With the above definitions, the cost function J(θ), which
we seek to minimize (1), is defined by equations (13)–(16).
An evaluation of the cost Jexp (θ ∗ ) is obtained by computing
the controller gain (14) based on the weight matrices (15),
(16), performing a 30 s balancing experiment on the physical
system, and computing the cost according to (13) from the
experimental data {xk , uk }k=0,...,K−1 . A simulation sample
Jsim (θ ∗ ) is obtained in the same manner by running a 30 s
simulation instead.
If a candidate controller violates safety limits on the states
and inputs, it is determined as unstable, and we assign a
fixed penalty of Jexp = 0.06 and Jsim = 0.04 for physical
experiment and simulation, respectively. These numbers are
chosen conservatively larger than the cost of the worse
stabilizing controller observed after some a priori initial
evaluations. Thus, evaluations during the learning procedure
shall not result in higher costs than these.
The controller is automatically tuned over roll-outs without human intervention. To this end, a nominal1 controller
θ nom = [0, 1.5] is balancing the pole when no tuning
experiment is being performed. The optimizer triggers new
experiments, when an evaluation on the real system is required. As soon as the experiment is finished, or instability is
1 The nominal controller is the optimal controller if the true dynamics
was linear according to the nominal model (A, B). Then, choosing Wx (θ)
and Wu (θ) corresponding to the cost (13) yields the optimal controller F,
see [14]. This is a typical choice when neglecting the nonlinear dynamics.
Cost
0.04
Simulation
Experiment
0.02
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Best Guess
# Iterations
0.1
0.08
J( )
0.06
0.1
Best guess
Final controller
0.05
0
1
0.02
5
0
4
-0.02
-3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
# Iterations
0.04
3
-2
-1
2
0
1
1
2
1
2
Fig. 3. GP posterior after termination of the exploration with MF-ES.
The evaluations on the simulator (light blue) are systematically below the
evaluations on the real system (dark blue). This bias is captured by the GP
model assuming a lower prior mean for the simulator data, as mentioned
in Sec. V-C. The posterior mean (green surface) and ±2 std (grey surface)
predict the underlying cost function of the real system, conditioned on the
observed data from both simulator and experiments. The best guess location
for the global minimum, θ bg , is represented by the orange dot.
detected, the system switches back to the nominal controller.
The nominal controller shows very poor performance, which
shall be improved with the proposed RL method.
C. Bayesian Optimization Settings
We apply the method of Sec. IV, MF-ES, to optimize the
experimental cost (13) by querying simulations and experiments. The efforts in (10) correspond to the approximate
times we need to wait until a simulation is computed and a
physical experiment is performed, tsim = 1 s and texp = 30 s,
i.e., simulations require 30 times less effort than physical
experiments.
For the GP model, we choose the rational quadratic kernel
with α = 1/4 (see [11]) for both ksim and kerr in (8).
Hyperparameters, such as length scales and output variances,
were chosen from some initial experiments and then held
fixed during optimization. As prior mean functions, we use
msim (θ) ≡ 0.04 and merr (θ) ≡ 0.02, respectively, for the
simulation and error GP. These choices correspond to the
penalties Jsim and Jexp given for unstable controllers (adding
msim and merr for the experiment). Hence, the prior mean
is pessimistic in the sense that we believe a controller to
be unstable before seeing any data. The prior variance of
2
2
= 1.6 × 10−5 and σerr
=
ksim and kerr are chosen as σsim
−4
3.84 × 10 respectively.
The noise standard deviation of an evaluation on the
real system, as defined in (2), has been estimated to
ηexp = 2.08 × 10−4 , while the noise of the simulator has
been set to ηsim = 10−5 , roughly twenty times lower.
We stop the exploration when the GP posterior mean at
the best guess θ bg (i.e., the current estimate of the global
minimum) has not changed significantly (within a range of
σerr /4 over the last 3 iterations), and we are sufficiently
certain about its value (posterior standard deviation at θ bg
Fig. 4. (Top) Cost obtained at each iteration with the proposed approach
during one exploration run. When the exploration terminates, the best guess
is evaluated on the physical system (violet dot). (Bottom) Evolution of the
GP posterior mean at the best guess µn (θ bg ) and std ±σn (θ bg ).
less than σerr /2). Once the exploration has terminated,
we evaluate the final best guess controller on a physical
experiment and take its cost as the outcome of the learning
procedure.
D. Results
We run MF-ES on the LQR problem described in Sec. VB. Fig. 3 shows the final GP cost function landscape after
the learning procedure, highlighting simulations (in light
blue) and experiments (in dark blue). For the same learning
run, Fig. 4 (top) illustrates how MF-ES alternates between
simulations and physical experiments over iterations. As can
be seen, the algorithm first performs multiple cheap simulations, which allow to identify regions of unstable controllers
(i.e., regions of high predicted cost in Fig. 3) without any real
experiment. At iterations 10 and 14, the algorithm demands
two expensive physical experiments. The reason is that a time
unit spent in simulation is expected to be less informative
than on a physical experiment. Thereby, experiment time
should be better spent on the physical system. Fig. 4 (bottom)
shows the GP posterior mean and standard deviation of the
best guess at each iteration. The stopping criterion terminates
the exploration after 14 iterations because the GP posterior
mean of the last three best guesses were steady enough.
Finally, the algorithm selects the last global minimum, θ bg =
[0.212, 2.42] (orange dot in Fig. 3), as the final controller,
which was evaluated on the physical system retrieving a low
cost J(θ bg ) = 0.0194.
As a remark, we observe that the algorithm alternates
between simulations and experiments in a non-trivial way,
which cannot be reproduced with a simple two-stage learning
process, where simulations are used to seed experimental
reinforcement learning. Furthermore, in Fig. 3, we can see
that the posterior mean around θ = [−2, 4] falls back to
the prior in the absence of evaluations. As pointed out in
Sec. V-C, the prior mean is pessimistic in the sense that
predicts instability in unforeseen areas, which is a reasonable
assumption in controller tuning of real systems.
In order to illustrate the benefit of trading off data from
experiments and simulations, we compare MF-ES to ES [3],
which uses only physical experiments. The latter corresponds
to the automatic controller tuning setting in [14]. We run each
of these methods ten times on the controller tuning problem.
The results are discussed in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6.
0.06
MF-ES
ES
Cost
0.04
0.02
0
Nominal Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
Run 5
Run 6
Run 7
Run 8
Run 9 Run 10
Fig. 5. Comparison of the final controller cost at each run between the
proposed approach (MF-ES) and ES. The cost of the nominal controller
(beige) with ± 2 std is shown for reference.
Number of evaluations
20
15
MF-ES Simulations
MF-ES Experiments
ES Experiments
10
5
0
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
Run 5
Run 6
Run 7
Run 8
Run 9
Run 10
Fig. 6. Number of physical experiments at each run for MF-ES (dark blue)
and standard ES (dark red), as well as simulations for MF-ES (light blue).
In Fig. 5, we show the cost of the final controller at each
run, for both methods. The cost of the nominal controller
(green) is shown as a reference. MF-ES finds controllers that
are 33.23% better, on average. Moreover, it consistently finds
stabilizing controllers, while ES fails to find a stabilizing
solution in 4 out of 10 cases (cost of 0.06).
Fig. 6 compares the number of physical experiments
performed with MF-ES (dark blue) and with ES (dark red).
While ES needs on average 3.5 physical experiments, MFES needs 2.7 (22.86% less) plus 11.9 simulations. These
results demonstrate that MF-ES can find, on average, better
controllers with a lower number of real experiments by also
leveraging information from simulations.
VI. C ONCLUSION
We have shown a generic Bayesian optimization that
can adaptively select between multiple information sources
with different accuracies and evaluation efforts, such as
experiments on a real robot and simulations. We applied
this method to a policy optimization task on a cart-pole
system. The experimental results confirm that using prior
model information from a simulator can reduce the amount
of data required to globally find good control policies.
R EFERENCES
[1] R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT press, 1998.
[2] J. Kober, J. A. Bagnell, and J. Peters, “Reinforcement learning in
robotics: A survey,” The International Journal of Robotics Research,
vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1238–1274, 2013.
[3] P. Hennig and C. J. Schuler, “Entropy search for information-efficient
global optimization,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 13,
no. 1, pp. 1809–1837, 2012.
[4] J. Villemonteix, E. Vazquez, and E. Walter, “An informational approach to the global optimization of expensive-to-evaluate functions,”
Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 509–540, 2008.
[5] M. Cutler and J. P. How, “Efficient reinforcement learning for robots
using informative simulated priors,” in IEEE International Conference
on Robotics and Automation, 2015, pp. 2605–2612.
[6] M. E. Taylor and P. Stone, “Transfer learning for reinforcement
learning domains: A survey,” Journal of Machine Learning Research,
vol. 10, pp. 1633–1685, 2009.
[7] M. Cutler, T. J. Walsh, and J. P. How, “Real-world reinforcement
learning via multifidelity simulators,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics,
vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 655–671, 2015.
[8] J. Peters and S. Schaal, “Policy gradient methods for robotics,” in IEEE
International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006, pp.
2219–2225.
[9] P. Abbeel, M. Quigley, and A. Y. Ng, “Using Inaccurate Models
in Reinforcement Learning,” in ACM International Conference on
Machine Learning, 2006, pp. 1–8.
[10] J. Mockus, Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization, ser. Mathematics and Its Applications, M. Hazewinkel, Ed. Springer, 1989,
vol. 37.
[11] C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine
Learning. MIT Press, 2006.
[12] D. J. Lizotte, T. Wang, M. H. Bowling, and D. Schuurmans, “Automatic gait optimization with Gaussian process regression.” in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, 2007, pp.
944–949.
[13] M. Tesch, J. Schneider, and H. Choset, “Using response surfaces and
expected improvement to optimize snake robot gait parameters,” in
IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems,
2011, pp. 1069–1074.
[14] A. Marco, P. Hennig, J. Bohg, S. Schaal, and S. Trimpe, “Automatic
LQR tuning based on Gaussian process global optimization,” in IEEE
International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2016, pp. 270–
277.
[15] H. Abdelrahman, F. Berkenkamp, J. Poland, and A. Krause, “Bayesian
optimization for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic power
plants,” in European Control Conference, 2016, pp. 2078–2083.
[16] F. Berkenkamp, A. Krause, and Angela P. Schoellig, “Bayesian optimization with safety constraints: Safe and automatic parameter tuning
in robotics.” arXiv, 2016, arXiv:1602.04450 [cs.RO].
[17] R. Calandra, A. Seyfarth, J. Peters, and M. P. Deisenroth, “An experimental comparison of Bayesian optimization for bipedal locomotion,”
in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2014,
pp. 1951–1958.
[18] A. Krause and C. S. Ong, “Contextual Gaussian process bandit
optimization,” in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2011, pp.
2447–2455.
[19] K. Swersky, J. Snoek, and R. P. Adams, “Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,
2013, pp. 2004–2012.
[20] M. C. Kennedy and A. O’Hagan, “Predicting the output from a
complex computer code when fast approximations are available,”
Biometrika, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2000.
[21] A. I. J. Forrester, A. Sóbester, and A. J. Keane, “Multi-fidelity
optimization via surrogate modelling,” Royal Society of London A:
Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 463, no. 2088,
pp. 3251–3269, 2007.
[22] K. Kandasamy, G. Dasarathy, J. B. Oliva, J. Schneider, and B. Poczos,
“Multi-fidelity Gaussian process bandit optimisation.” arXiv, 2016,
arXiv:1603.06288 [cs, stat].
[23] M. Poloczek, J. Wang, and P. I. Frazier, “Multi-Information Source
Optimization with General Model Discrepancies.”
arXiv, 2016,
arXiv:1603.00389v2 [stat.ML].
[24] P. Frazier, W. Powell, and S. Dayanik, “The knowledge-gradient policy
for correlated normal beliefs,” INFORMS Journal on Computing,
vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 599–613, 2009.
[25] N. Srinivas, A. Krause, S. M. Kakade, and M. Seeger, “Gaussian
process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental
design,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, 2010, pp.
1015–1022.
[26] Quanser, “Self-erecting single inverted pendulum – Instructor manual”,” Tech. Rep. 516, rev. 4.1.
[27] S. Trimpe, A. Millane, S. Doessegger, and R. D’Andrea, “A self-tuning
LQR approach demonstrated on an inverted pendulum,” in 19th IFAC
World Congress, 2014, pp. 11 281–11 287.
[28] B. D. O. Anderson and J. B. Moore, Optimal Control: Linear
Quadratic Methods. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, 2007.
[29] J. Roberts, I. Manchester, and R. Tedrake, “Feedback controller
parameterizations for reinforcement learning,” in IEEE Symposium on
Adaptive Dynamic Programming And Reinforcement Learning, 2011,
pp. 310–317.
| 3cs.SY
|
Modeling and Reasoning over Distributed Systems using
Aspect-Oriented Graph Grammars
Rodrigo Machado
Reiko Heckel
Leila Ribeiro
Univ. Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre, Brazil
[email protected]
Univ. of Leicester
Leicester, UK
[email protected]
Univ. Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre, Brazil
[email protected]
Aspect-orientation is a relatively new paradigm that introduces abstractions to modularize the implementation of system-wide policies. It is based on a composition operation, called aspect weaving,
that implicitly modifies a base system by performing related changes within the system modules.
Aspect-oriented graph grammars (AOGG) extend the classic graph grammar formalism by defining
aspects as sets of rule-based modifications over a base graph grammar. Despite the advantages of
aspect-oriented concepts regarding modularity, the implicit nature of the aspect weaving operation
may also introduce issues when reasoning about the system behavior. Since in AOGGs aspect weaving is characterized by means of rule-based rewriting, we can overcome these problems by using
known analysis techniques from the graph transformation literature to study aspect composition. In
this paper, we present a case study of a distributed client-server system with global policies, modeled as an aspect-oriented graph grammar, and discuss how to use the AGG tool to identify potential
conflicts in aspect weaving.
1
Introduction
Aspect-oriented programming [11] is a relatively new paradigm which introduces abstractions to modularize the implementation of system-wide policies. It is based on a composition operation, called aspect
weaving, that modifies a base system globally according to structural rules such as, for instance, “register
in a global log all modifications in the value of the field x of class C”. As characterized in [7], an aspect
is a module that i) identifies in other modules sets of execution points, which are called pointcuts, and ii)
define transformation rules associated with pointcuts. Those rules are called advices. Given a pointcut
language expressive enough, the implementation of global policies becomes modular and consistent as
the system evolves, i.e. new modules will abide by the global policy in the same way as the current ones.
Those advantages stimulated the adoption of aspect-oriented programming in software development.
Several languages now have aspect-oriented extensions, the most popular being the Java superset AspectJ [10]. Moreover, the usage of AOP-related concepts also started to appear in languages for system
modeling, such as UML diagrams [9]. However, the wide usage of aspect-oriented concepts also introduces issues in the software development process. The implicit modifications caused by aspect weaving
may result in behaviors which are difficult to identify by source code analysis. Also, when the system
has more than one aspect they may interfere with each other, resulting in different final systems according to the order they are combined. To deal with those problems, the developer needs proper models to
reason consistently about the aspect influence. On the formal side, several aspect-oriented calculi have
been proposed to characterize aspect interference over programming languages [16, 8, 5, 4]. On the
implementation side, integrated development environments offer support to new views related to aspect
weaving [1]. However, outside the scope of source-code level aspects, there are still few models and
techniques available to reason about aspect-oriented diagrams.
I. Mackie and A. Martins Moreira (Eds.): Tenth International
Workshop on Rule-Based Programming (RULE 2009)
EPTCS 21, 2010, pp. 39–50, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.21.4
Modeling and Reasoning over Distributed Systems using AOGGs
40
The current proposals for studying aspect weaving over diagrams have a strong connection with
graph transformation systems and graph grammars, models where the system state is represented by a
graph, and its execution, by the application of graph rewriting rules. Given the natural representation of
diagrams as graphs, both aspect-oriented systems and graph transformation systems share some common
characteristics: pointcuts resemble matches for graph rules, and advices resemble graph rules themselves.
In [13], aspect-oriented graph grammars (AOGGs) were proposed as an extension of the traditional graph
grammars, where aspects were modeled as second-order transformations over the original specification.
The advantage of this approach is that the same rewriting mechanism is used for both aspect weaving
and base system execution, allowing to relate them formally. However, up to now it was not shown
how to reason about AOGG models. In this work, we propose the use of AGG [2], an attributed graph
grammar specification and analysis tool to reason about AOGG models. Since AGG does not support
directly AOGGs, we propose an encoding procedure to convert graph grammar specifications into a
single typed graph, with aspects being modeled as sets of graph rewriting rules. Then, we use the
analysis functionalities of AGG to study conflicts between advices and aspects in the encoded AOGG
system.
The text is organized as follows: in Section 2, we review the graph grammar model, and introduce
the base client-server example. In Section 3, we recall aspect-oriented graph grammars and present
examples of aspects over the base system. In Section 4 we present the encoding of AOGGs as typed
graphs in order to use the AGG tool. We discuss the use of critical pair analysis to study the aspect
weaving in the encoded system in Section 5. Final remarks, related work and future steps are discussed
in Section 6.
2
Graph Grammars
A typed graph grammar is a visual model where the system state is represented by a graph and the
system behavior is described by means of rule-based graph rewriting. Formally, a typed graph grammar
is a tuple hT, G0 , P, π i, where i) T is a type graph defining the allowed kinds of nodes and edges within the
specification; ii) the T -typed graph G0 is the initial state of the system; iii) P is a set of rule names, and iv)
the function π : P → Rules(T ) maps every rule name to is respective T -typed graph transformation rule.
In this work we follow the double-pushout (DPO) approach to graph transformation [6], where a graph
transformation rule is represented as a monic span (a pair of injective morphisms with the same source)
l
r
L K R in the category T -Graph (T -typed graphs and type-preserving graph homomorphisms). The
left-hand side (LHS) graph L represents the pattern to be found in order to apply the rule. The right-hand
side (RHS) graph R defines new graph elements to be added by the rule. The interface graph K and graph
inclusions l and r identify elements in L and R. Elements in L but not in l(K) are said to be deleted,
elements in R but not in r(K) are said to be created, and elements in K are preserved or read.
Example 1 (Graph grammar). Figure 1 depicts a distributed client-server system modeled as a graph
grammar. The type graph T defines four kinds of nodes (Client, Server, Data and Message) and four
kinds of edges. The initial graph G0 defines the initial state of the system: two clients with messages to
be sent and two data servers. Clients may retrieve values from servers or update stored data by means
of message exchange. The system rules model this interaction as follows: a GET message is sent to
the server by SendGET, then the data is retrieved by ExecuteGET, and it is returned to the client by
ReceiveGET. The rules SendSET, ExecuteSET and ReceiveSET work in a similar way for messages
that update data elements. Regarding the notation, rules are presented only by their left-hand side and
right-hand side graphs. Common elements in K are simply marked to be the same in L and R using
Machado R., Heckel R., Ribeiro L.
Figure 1: Client-server system as a graph grammar.
41
Modeling and Reasoning over Distributed Systems using AOGGs
42
numbered prefixes (1:, 2:, . . . ). It is also important to notice that this example uses attributed graph
nodes, which is an extension of the basic typed graph grammar formalism.
In order to apply a graph transformation rule L ← K → R over a graph G it is required that there is
some match in G for elements of L. Matches are defined as graph homomorphism m : L → G. Then, a rule
r,m
application (or direct derivation) from graph G to graph H using rule r and match m (denoted G =⇒ H)
is defined as the following diagram in the category T -Graph, where both squares are pushouts.
L
m
G
l
(1)
K
k
l∗
D
r
R
m∗
(2)
H
r∗
l∗
k
In the DPO approach, rule application relies on finding G ← D ← K such that the square to the left is
a pushout. This may not always be possible depending on the rule and match. For instance, when the
rule tries to delete a node that has incident edges not in m(L), or when the match identifies preserved
elements with deleted ones.
The sequential behavior of a graph grammar is given by the successive application of graph rules
starting from the initial graph. Usually, both rules and matches are nondeterministically chosen at each
step. Operationally, this works as follows:
1. Set G0 as the current graph.
2. Find in the current graph all possible matches for rules in the set P of rule names.
3. Verify application conditions for matches, defining the set of valid pairs (rule,match).
4. If there is no valid pair at all, then STOP. Otherwise, non-deterministically choose a pair
(rule,match) to be applied.
5. Delete from G all matched elements in L \ K. This will generate a graph D.
6. Create in D all elements in R \ K. This will generate a graph H.
7. Set H as the current graph. Return to step 2.
Graph grammars are particularly useful to represent distributed systems since graph rules represent
local transformations. This means that two or more rules may be applied in parallel if they do not conflict
with each other. Moreover, the rules are usually intuitive and the control flow is data-driven, being guided
by the graph topology.
The AGG tool [2] allows to create, run and analyze graph grammars. Moreover, it supports several
extensions to the basic typed graph grammar language, such as attributed graph elements, control flow
mechanisms (rule layers, priorities), definition of positive and negative application conditions for rules,
among others. The AGG graph transformation engine follows the single-pushout (SPO) approach [12],
but it may also be configured to consider the conditions that characterize DPO transformations.
3
Aspect-Oriented Graph Grammars
Aspect-Oriented Graph Grammars (AOGGs) [13] are graph grammars with aspects, i.e. modular descriptions of system-wide policies. Formally, an AOGG is a pair hG , ∆i, where G = hT, G0 , P, π i is a
Machado R., Heckel R., Ribeiro L.
43
base graph grammar, and ∆ = [A1 , A2 , . . . , An ] is a sequence of graph aspects over G . A graph aspect represents a set of modifications over the base graph grammar, and it is defined by a triple hD,t, gi, where
D is a set of graph advices, t : T ֒→ T ′ is an extension of the original type graph and g : G0 ֒→ G′ is an
extension of the original initial graph.
Graph advices are rules that modify graph transformation rules. Following the intuition provided by
the DPO approach, graph advices are defined as monic spans p i e. The difference is that p, i, e are
themselves graph rules, and l, r are rule morphisms. Rule morphisms are defined as triples of morphisms
connecting the graph components of two rules, respecting the commutativity of the inner squares. This
way, a graph advice correspond to the following commutative diagram in T -Graph.
Rp
Kp
Lp
Re
Ri
Ki
Li
Ke
Le
To emphasize the distinction between advices and base system rules, the components of a graph
advice receive specific names: pointcut p, advice interface i and effect e.
Example 2 (Log Aspect). Suppose we want to implement a logging mechanism over the client-server
system such that every operation leaves an execution trace over a global object (the system logger). To
implement this functionality, we should extend the type graph to introduce the logger type, initialize it in
the initial graph and modify all rules to register their execution in this global object. Using AOGG, all
these modifications can be enclosed within one single aspect, as shown in Figure 2. This aspect has only
one advice, which has an empty pointcut. The advice adds a Logger object to both the LHS and RHS of
the rule such that the occurrence on the RHS has the rule name appended to the story string. Notice
that this value update depends on the existence of a reflective operation rulename() which provides the
name of the rule being executed. The empty pointcut matches all possible rules of the specification, thus
after aspect weaving all of them will read and update the global log object.
Figure 2: Log aspect
Example 3 (Security Aspect). Another kind of system-wide modification is the introduction of access
control for servers. A simple implementation is to define two kinds of permissions for clients: Read and
Write. Those permissions, represented as endoarcs in client nodes, affect message exchanges. A "SET"
44
Modeling and Reasoning over Distributed Systems using AOGGs
message may only be sent by a user with write privileges, while a "GET" message, only by a user with
read privileges. The aspect depicted in Figure 3 implements this policy over the base graph grammar of
Example 1. The act of sending a message of a given kind (SET or GET) defines the pattern used in the
pointcuts of both advices. The effect is to augment the rules such that they require the respective user
permissions to be read in order to execute. In both advices the interface i is the same as the pointcut p.
Figure 3: Security aspect
As with graph rewriting, rule rewriting (advice application) is also defined as a double-pushout diagram. The difference is that it uses the category T -MSpan of T -typed rules and rule morphisms [13].
Given a graph grammar G = hT, G0 , P, π i and a graph aspect hD,t, gi over G , with t : T → T ′ and
g : G0 → G′0 , the result of weaving A and G is the graph grammar G ′ = hT ′ , G′0 , P′ , π ′ i. The rule set
(P′ , π ′ ) is calculated based on (P, π ) as the least set of rules such that
1. If a rule in (P, π ) is not matched by any advice in A, them the rule is kept unchanged in (P′ , π ′ ).
2. If a rule is matched by at least one advice in A, all the results of one-step rewritings (considering
all possible advices and matchings) become elements of (P′ , π ′ ). In this case, the original rule does
not appear in (P′ , π ′ ).
This definition for aspect weaving makes advice rewriting non-reentrant, i.e. a given rule may not be
modified more than once per advice and match. This assures termination for the weaving process, even
for advices that do not delete elements from rules. Finally, the semantics of an AOGG hG , ∆i is given
by its respective weaved graph grammar GW∆ , defined as the result of weaving all aspects of ∆ over G in
their respective order.
Machado R., Heckel R., Ribeiro L.
4
45
Encoding AOGGs in AGG
The use of graph rewriting as an aspect weaving mechanism opens the possibility of using known techniques from the graph transformation area to reason about aspects. Those techniques allow the system
modeler to identify potentially harmful behaviors of the final weaved system, such as unintended aspect
interactions, at early stages of the system development. Furthermore, existing tools such as AGG can be
used to analyze aspect-oriented models.
Our approach consists in encoding the whole structure of a graph grammar specification as a single typed graph. For this, a representation of monic spans using graph elements is needed to encode
individual rules. Moreover, one needs to encode both initial graph and rule set while keeping their as
distinguished elements of the specification. For this, we employ the traditional graph typing mechanism:
the type graph for the encoding of G = hT, G0 , P, π i has two disjoint components. The first is the original
type graph T , used to type the initial graph G0 . The second is R(T ), used to type the encoded representation of the rule set. We start by defining the operation R that calculates the second component based on
the original type graph T .
Definition 1 (Type graph rule encoding). The operation R : Graph → Graph is defined as the composition R3 ◦ R2 ◦ R1 , where:
• R1 encodes edges as nodes. The edges of the resulting graph follow the source and target functions
of the input graph.
• R2 creates three copies of the input graph (to represent L, K and R). Each node in K is connected
to its copy in L and R by means of new edges.
• R3 creates a new node in the graph together with edges connecting all the original nodes to this
node. This node represents the identity of the rule.
Example 4 (Type graph rule encoding). Figure 4 shows how to obtain R(T ) from a simple type graph T
using the successive transformations R1 , R2 and R3 .
Figure 4: Example of type graph rule encoding.
Now we define the operation S, which encodes T -typed rules as R(T )-typed graphs.
l
r
Definition 2 (Graph rule encoding). Given a T -typed graph rule r : L ← K → R, the graph rule encoding
S : Rules(T ) → R(T )-Graph is defined as the composition S3 ◦ S2 ◦ S1 , where
46
Modeling and Reasoning over Distributed Systems using AOGGs
• S1 applies R1 to L, K, R, and types them, respectively, over the left, central and right embeddings
of R1 (T ) in R(T ).
• S2 adds concrete edges to the input graph following the homomorphisms l and r.
• S3 creates a new node typed over the node created by transformation R3 , together with new edges
connecting all nodes of the input graph to it.
Definition 3 (Graph rule set encoding). Given a graph grammar G = hT, G0 , P, π i, the R(T )-typed graph
ϒ(G ) is defined as the gluing [S(π (r1 )), S(π (r2 )), . . . , S(π (rn ))] where r1..n ∈ P.
The graph ϒ(G ) is the union of all encodings of rules S(π (rx )) typed over the single type graph R(T ).
Example 5 (Graph rule set encoding). Figure 5 depicts a small graph grammar G (on the left) and its
respective R(T )-typed encoding ϒ(G ) (on the right).
Figure 5: Example of graph rule set encoding.
Definition 4 (Encoded graph grammar). Given a graph grammar G = hT, G0 , P, π i, its graph encoding is
the (T + R(T ))-typed graph |G | = G0 + ϒ(G ), where “+” stands for the disjoint union of typed graphs.
Definition 5 (Encoded advice). Let A = hD,t, gi be and aspect over G , such that t : T → T ′ . Then, for
every advice a : p ← i → e ∈ D, its respective encoding |a| is the R(T ′ )-typed span S(p) ← S(i) → S(e).
Definition 6 (Encoded aspect-oriented graph grammar). Let D = (G , ∆) be an AOGG, such that
∆ , P∆ , π ∆ i be the weaved graph grammar
G = hT, G0 , P, π i and ∆ = [A1 , A2 , . . . , An ]. Let GW∆ = hTW∆ , GW
W W
obtained from weaving ∆ over G . Then, the encoded aspect-oriented graph grammar |D| is the graph
∆ , P, π i is the type and initial graph extension
grammar hTW∆ + R(TW∆ ), |G ′ |, |P∆ |, |π∆ |i where G ′ = hTW∆ , GW
of G and the rule set (|P∆ |, |π∆ |) correspond to the gluing of all encoded advices |a| ∈ Di of all aspects
Ai = hDi ,ti , gi i, 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
In an AOGG D, each aspect extend the type graph and initial graph of the original system. In the
encoded graph |D|, all these extensions must be present in order to accommodate all encoded advices
(of all aspects) in the same rule set.
Example 6 (Encoded AOGG). Figure 6 shows the encoding of (G , [A1 , A2 ]), where G is the base system
of Figure 1, A1 is the log aspect (Figure 2) and A2 is the security aspect (Figure 3). For the sake of
readability, some elements are omitted: attribute types in the type graph and attribute values in the
initial graph and base system rules. However, attribute values are shown in the encoded advices. In all
encoded advices the interface graph K and the left-hand side graph L are the same.
Machado R., Heckel R., Ribeiro L.
Figure 6: Encoded client-server system with log and security aspects.
47
48
5
Modeling and Reasoning over Distributed Systems using AOGGs
Analyzing AOGG specifications
From the point of view of aspect weaving, it is relevant to be able to predict when two different advices
will potentially affect the same part of the specification. If this occurs, a different aspect ordering may
yield a different weaved system. Given that we encode an AOGG specification as a graph grammar,
we are able to apply techniques from graph rewriting theory to test the existence of conflicts between
aspects.
Critical pair analysis (CPA) is a static analysis technique that is used to detect both conflicts and
r1 ,m1
dependencies between graph rewriting rules. Given a graph G and two direct derivations G =⇒ G′ ,
r2 ,m2
G =⇒ G′′ , we say that the derivations are in conflict if one of them deletes some graph element that
is preserved or deleted by the other one. Thus, their execution in parallel is not possible. Given two
r2 ,m2
r1 ,m1
subsequent direct derivations G =⇒ G′ =⇒ G′′ , we say that there is a dependency between (r1 , m1 ) and
(r2 , m2 ) if the first creates a graph element that is preserved or deleted by the later. In this case, it is
not possible to swap their order of execution. Critical pair analysis is used to test potential conflicts and
dependencies within a graph grammar and consists of the following general steps:
1. The set of all pairs of rules (r1 , r2 ) ∈ P × P is generated.
2. For each pair (r1 , r2 ), all possible overlaps between a graph of r1 and a graph of r2 are calculated. In the case of conflict analysis, both LHSs are considered in this calculation. In the case of
dependencies analysis, the RHS of r1 and the LHS of r2 are considered.
3. All overlaps are tested for conflicts or dependencies.
4. The number of all conflicting (or dependent) overlaps for each pair of rules is shown in a table.
Figure 7: Critical pair analysis of the base system in AGG.
Aspect-oriented graph grammars are two-layer specifications where the base graph grammar describe the original system behavior, while aspects describe the implementation of global policies as
model transformation. By using the encoding of Section 4, we can use AGG to study characteristics of aspect weaving in a similar way as the original system execution. Figure 7 shows the results
Machado R., Heckel R., Ribeiro L.
49
of critical pair analysis for the base graph grammar. In this level, conflicts arise only in the pair
(ExecuteSet,ExecuteGET) when the first rule updates a value which is read by the second one. Dependencies reflect Send-Execute-Receive sequences of derivations, induced by the value of the Type
attribute in message nodes. In the aspect level we analyze the possibility of conflicts in the aspect weaving process, since the rules are actually encoded advices. Figure 8 shows the results of CPA for the
encoded model of Figure 6. In this particular system, where the advices do not delete elements from
rules, the rules are obviously conflict-free. Lack of conflicts in the aspect level means that final weaved
system does not change even if we change the order aspects are weaved to the base system. If there was
at least one conflicting pair of encoded advices (a1 , a2 ) where a1 and a2 are not in the same aspect, then
the aspects could potentially interact and aspect weaving would not be necessarily a confluent operation.
Figure 8: Critical pair analysis of the aspect-oriented encoded system in AGG.
6
Final remarks
This work proposed the use of AOGG to model distributed system with aspects, and also the use of the
AGG tool to study their behavior. We introduced the AOGG model, described an encoding mechanism to
describe the base system as a single typed graph, and discussed the use of critical pair analysis to reason
about conflicts in the aspect weaving operation.
The idea of using graph rewriting to define aspect weaving is not entirely new. In [14, 17], aspect
weaving is also defined by means of graph rewriting, and the AGG tool is used to analyze the specification
using critical pair analysis. In those approaches, however, UML diagrams are used as base system model.
Following a different direction, the work by Aksit et al. [3] encodes a complete aspect-oriented calculus
into the graph transformation tool Groove [15]. This allows to study the interference between aspects
directly in the system unfolding, by employing the space-state generation feature of Groove.
As future work, we intend to explore the properties of the proposed encoding. This is required in
order to relate the behavior of the weaved system to the behavior of the original base system together
with aspect specification. Furthermore, the usage of graph grammars as base systems may provide
insights about how rule-base modification of rules affect the respective rule derivations, since both are
representable as diagrams within the same categorical framework.
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. This work was partially supported by CNPq – Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientı́fico e Tecnológico.
50
Modeling and Reasoning over Distributed Systems using AOGGs
References
[1] Eclipse AJDT: AspectJ Development Tools. http://www.eclipse.org/ajdt/.
[2] The AGG Homepage. http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/ gragra/agg/.
[3] Mehmet Aksit, Arend Rensink & Tom Staijen (2009): A graph-transformation-based simulation approach
for analysing aspect interference on shared join points. In: AOSD ’09: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on Aspect-oriented software development. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 39–50.
[4] Curtis Clifton & Gary T. Leavens (2006): MiniMAO1 : an imperative core language for studying aspectoriented reasonings. Sci. Comput. Program. 63(3), pp. 321–374. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.
1016/j.scico.2006.02.009.
[5] Simplice Djoko Djoko, Rémi Douence, Pascal Fradet & Didier Le Botlan (2006): CASB: Common Aspect
Semantics Base,. Technical Report, Research Report, Network of Excellence in AOSD (AOSD-Europe,
August 2006, no D54).
[6] H. Ehrig, M. Pfender & H. J. Schneider (1973): Graph-grammars: An algebraic approach. In: Switching and
Automata Theory, 1973. SWAT ’08. IEEE Conference Record of 14th Annual Symposium on. pp. 167–180.
[7] Robert E. Filman & Daniel P. Friedman (2000): Aspect-Oriented Programming is Quantification and Obliviousness. Technical Report.
[8] Radha Jagadeesan, Alan Jeffrey & James Riely (2006): Typed parametric polymorphism for aspects. Sci.
Comput. Program. 63(3), pp. 267–296.
[9] José Uetanabara Júnior, Valter Vieira Camargo & Christina Von Flach Chavez (2009): UML-AOF: a profile
for modeling aspect-oriented frameworks. In: AOM ’09: Proceedings of the 13th workshop on Aspectoriented modeling. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–6.
[10] Gregor Kiczales, Erik Hilsdale, Jim Hugunin, Mik Kersten, Jeffrey Palm & William G. Griswold (2001):
An Overview of AspectJ. In: ECOOP. pp. 327–353. Available at http://link.springer.de/link/
service/series/0558/bibs/2072/20720327.htm.
[11] Gregor Kiczales, John Lamping, Anurag Mendhekar, Chris Maeda, Cristina Videira Lopes, Jean-Marc Loingtier & John Irwin (1997): Aspect-Oriented Programming. In: ECOOP. pp. 220–242. Available at http://
link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/1241/12410220.htm.
[12] Michael Löwe (1993): Algebraic approach to single-pushout graph transformation. Theor. Comput. Sci.
109(1-2), pp. 181–224.
[13] Rodrigo Machado, Luciana Foss & Leila Ribeiro (2009): Aspects for Graph Grammars. In: Proceedings of
the 8th International Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques.
[14] Katharina Mehner, Mattia Monga & Gabriele Taentzer (2006): Interaction Analysis in Aspect-Oriented Models. Requirements Engineering, 14th IEEE International Conference , pp. 69–78.
[15] Arend Rensink (2004): The GROOVE simulator: A tool for state space generation. In: Applications of Graph
Transformations with Industrial Relevance (AGTIVE), volume 3062 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
Springer, pp. 479–485.
[16] David Walker, Steve Zdancewic & Jay Ligatti (2003): A Theory of Aspects. In: ICFP ’03: Proceedings of the
eighth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming. ACM Press, New York, NY,
USA, pp. 127–139.
[17] Jon Whittle & Praveen K. Jayaraman (2007): MATA: A Tool for Aspect-Oriented Modeling Based on Graph
Transformation. In: Holger Giese, editor: MoDELS Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5002.
Springer, pp. 16–27. Available at http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/models/models2007w.html#
WhittleJ07.
| 6cs.PL
|
Risk-Management Methods for the Libor Market Model Using
Semidefinite Programming∗
arXiv:cs/0302035v2 [cs.CE] 5 Oct 2005
A. d’Aspremont†
December 27, 2017
Abstract
When interest rate dynamics are described by the Libor Market Model as in Brace, Gatarek & Musiela (1997),
we show how some essential risk-management results can be obtained from the dual of the calibration program. In
particular, if the objective is to maximize another swaption’s price, we show that the optimal dual variables describe a
hedging portfolio in the sense of Avellaneda & Paras (1996). In the general case, the local sensitivity of the covariance
matrix to all market movement scenarios can be directly computed from the optimal dual solution. We also show how
semidefinite programming can be used to manage the Gamma exposure of a portfolio.
Keywords: Libor Market Model, Inverse problems, Semidefinite Programming, Calibration.
1 Introduction
A recent stream of works on the Libor Market Model have showed how swap rates can be approximated by a basket
of lognormal processes under an appropriate choice of forward measure. This, coupled with analytic European basket
call pricing approximations, allows to cast the problem of calibrating the Libor Market Model to a set of European
caps and swaptions as a semidefinite program, i.e. a linear program on the cone of positive semidefinite matrices (see
Nesterov & Nemirovskii (1994) and Boyd & Vandenberghe (2004)). This work exploits the related duality theory to
provide explicit sensitivity and hedging results based on the optimal solution to the calibration program.
The lognormal approximation for basket pricing has its origin in electrical engineering as the addition of noise
in decibels (see for example Schwartz & Yeh (1981)). Its application to basket option pricing dates back to Huynh
(1994) or Musiela & Rutkowski (1997). Brace, Dun & Barton (1999) tested its empirical validity for swaption pricing
and Brace & Womersley (2000) used it to study Bermudan swaptions. More recently, d’Aspremont (2003), Kawai
(2002) and Kurbanmuradov, Sabelfeld & Schoenmakers (2002) obtained additional terms in the expansion and further
evidence on the approximation performance. On the calibration front, Rebonato (1998) and Rebonato (1999) highlight
the importance of jointly calibrating volatilities and correlations. These works, together with Longstaff, Santa-Clara &
Schwartz (2000) also detail some of the most common non-convex calibration techniques based on parametrizations
of the forward rates covariance factors. The mixed static-dynamic hedging formulation of the pricing problem has its
source in the works by El Karoui, Jeanblanc-Picqué & Shreve (1998), Avellaneda, Levy & Paras (1995) and Avellaneda
& Paras (1996), while Romagnoli & Vargiolu (2000) provide some closed-form results in the multivariate case.
Here, we show how the dual solution to the calibration program provides a complete description of the sensitivity
to changes in market condition. In fact, because the algorithms used to solve the calibration problem jointly solve the
problem and its dual, the sensitivity of the calibrated covariance matrix is readily available from the dual solution to
the calibration program. When the objective in the calibration program is another swaption’s price, the dual solution
∗ This work has been developed under the direction of Nicole El Karoui and I am very grateful to her. I also benefited in my work from
discussions with Guillaume Amblard, Marco Avellaneda, Vlad Bally, Stephen Boyd, Jérôme Busca, Rama Cont, Darrell Duffie, Stefano Gallucio,
Laurent El Ghaoui, Jean-Michel Lasry, Marek Musiela, Ezra Nahum, Antoon Pelsser, Yann Samuelides, Olivier Scaillet, Robert Womersley, seminar
participants at the GdR FIQAM at the Ecole Polytechnique, the May 2002 Workshop on Interest Rate Models organized by Frontières en Finance
in Paris, the June 2002 AFFI conference in Strasbourg and the Summer School on Modern Convex Optimization at the C.O.R.E. in U.C.L. Finally,
I am also very grateful to Jérôme Lebuchoux, Cyril Godart and everybody inside FIRST and the S.P.G. at Paribas Capital Markets in London, their
advice and assistance has been key in the development of this work.
† ORFE, Princeton University, Princeton NJ 08544, U.S.A. Email: [email protected]. This work started while the author was at
CMAPX, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
1
also describes an approximate solution to the optimal hedging problem in Avellaneda & Paras (1996), which computes
the price of a derivative product as the sum of a static hedging portfolio and a dynamic strategy hedging the worst-case
residual risk. We also show how semidefinite programming can be used to efficiently solve the problem of optimally
managing the Gamma exposure of a portfolio using vanilla options, as posed by Douady (1995).
The results we obtain here underline the key advantages of applying semidefinite programming methods to the
calibration problem: besides their numerical performance, they naturally provide some central results on sensitivity
and risk-management. They can also eliminate numerical errors in sensitivity computations that were caused by the
inherent instability of non-convex calibration techniques.
The paper is organized as follows: In the next section, we quickly recall the calibration program construction
for the Libor Market Model. Section three shows how to compute key sensitivities from the dual solution to this
calibration problem. A fourth section details how these results can be used to form hedging portfolios. Finally, in the
last section, we present some numerical results.
2 Model Calibration
In this section, we begin by briefly recalling the Libor Market Model construction along the lines of Brace et al. (1997)
(see also Jamshidian (1997), Sandmann & Sondermann (1997) and Miltersen, Sandmann & Sondermann (1997)). We
then describe how to form the calibration program.
2.1 Zero coupon dynamics
We use the Musiela parametrization of the Heath, Jarrow & Morton (1992) setup. r(t, θ ) is the continuously compounded instantaneous forward rate at time t, with duration θ . To avoid any confusion, Roman letters will be used for
maturity dates and Greek ones for durations. The zero-coupon is here computed as
Z T −t
r(t, θ )d θ
B(t, T ) = exp −
(1)
0
All dynamics are described in a probability space (Ω, {Ft ;t ≥ 0}, P) where the filtration {Ft ;t ≥ 0} is the Paugmentation of the natural filtration generated by a d dimensional Brownian motion W = {Wt ,t ≥ 0}. The savings
account is defined by:
βt = exp
Z t
r(s, 0)ds
0
and represents the amount generated at time t ≥ 0 by continuously reinvesting 1 euro in the spot rate r(s, 0) during the
period 0 ≤ s ≤ t. As in Heath et al. (1992), the absence of arbitrage between all zero-coupons and the savings account
states that:
Zt
Z
B(t, T )
1 t
2
(2)
|σ (s, T − s)| ds
= B(0, T ) exp − σ (s, T − s)dWs −
βt
2 0
0
is a martingale under P for all T > 0, where for all θ ≥ 0 the zero-coupon bond volatility process {σ (t, θ ); θ ≥ 0} is
Ft -adapted with values in Rd . We assume that the function θ 7−→ σ (t, θ ) is absolutely continuous and the derivative
τ (t, θ ) = ∂ /∂ θ (σ (t, θ )) is bounded on R2 × Ω.
2.2 Libor diffusion process
All Heath et al. (1992) based arbitrage models are fully specified by their volatility structure and the forward rates
curve today. The specification of the volatility σ (t, θ ) in Brace et al. (1997) is based on the assumption that for a given
underlying maturity δ (for ex. 3 months) the associated forward Libor process {L(t, θ );t ≥ 0} with maturity θ defined
by:
1 + δ L(t, θ ) = exp
2
Z θ +δ
θ
r(t, ν )d ν
has a lognormal volatility structure. Using the Ito formula combined with the dynamics detailed above, we get as in
Brace et al. (1997):
∂ L(s,θ )
(1+δ L(s,θ )) B
B (s, θ + δ ) − σ B (s, θ )) ds
dL(s, θ ) =
+
σ
(s,
θ
+
δ
)(
σ
∂θ
δ
(3)
+ δ1 (1 + δ L(s, θ )) (σ B (s, θ + δ ) − σ B(s, θ ))dWs
where Ws is the Brownian motion defined above and the deterministic volatility function γ : R2+ 7−→ Rd is bounded and
piecewise continuous. To get the desired lognormal volatility for Libors we must specify the zero-coupon volatility
σ (t, Ti ) as:
i−1
δ K(t, T j )
σ (t, Ti ) = ∑
γ (t, T j − t)
(4)
j=1 1 + δ K(t, T j )
where {T1 , . . . , TM } is a calendar with period δ and the Forward Rate Agreement K(t, T ) = L(t, T − t) dynamics are
given by:
dK(s, T ) = γ (s, T − s)K(s, T ) [σ (s, T − s + δ )ds + dWs]
Finally, as in Brace et al. (1997) we set σ (t, θ ) = 0 for 0 ≤ θ < δ .
2.3 Swaps
A swap rate is the rate that zeroes the present value of a set of periodical exchanges of a fixed coupon against a floating
coupon equal to a Libor rate. In a representation that is central in swaption pricing approximations, we can write swaps
as baskets of forwards (see for ex. Rebonato (1998)). For example, in the case of a swap with start date TS and end
date TN :
N
swap(t, TS , TN ) = ∑ ωi (t)K(t, Ti )
(5)
i=S
where TS , TN are calendar dates in {T1 , . . . , TM }, and:
ωi (t) =
cvg(Ti , Ti+1 )B(t, Ti+1 )
Level(t, TS , TN )
(6)
with cvg(Ti , Ti+1 ), the coverage (time interval) between Ti and Ti+1 and Level(t, TS , TN ) the level payment, i.e. the sum
of the discount factors for the fixed calendar of the swap weighted by their associated coverage:
N
Level(t, TS , TN ) = ∑ cvg(Ti , Ti+1 )B(t, Ti+1 )
i=S
2.4 Swaption price approximation
As in Brace & Womersley (2000), d’Aspremont (2003) or Kurbanmuradov et al. (2002), we approximate the swap
dynamics by a one-dimensional lognormal process, assuming the weights ωi (t) are constant equal to ωi :
N
d swap(s, TS , TN )
= ∑ ω̂i γ (s, Ti − s)dWsLV L
swap(s, T, TN )
i=S
where
ω̂i = ωi
(7)
K(t, Ti )
swap(t, TS , TN )
is computed from the market data today and WtLV L is a d dimensional Brownian motion under the swap martingale
measure defined in Jamshidian (1997), which takes the level payment as a numéraire. We can use the order zero basket
pricing approximation in Huynh (1994) and compute the price of a payer swaption starting with maturity T, written
on swap(s, TS , TN ), with strike κ using the Black (1976) pricing formula:
p
Level(t, TS , TN ) swap(t, TS , TN )N(h) − κ N h − VTS
(8)
3
where
S ,TN )
+ 21 VTS
ln swap(t,T
κ
p
h=
VTS
and swap(t, TS , TN ) is the value of the forward swap today with the variance VTS given by:
VT
=
Z TS
t
=
Z TS
t
2
N
∑ ω̂i γ (s, Ti − s)
i=S
ds =
Z TS
t
N
∑
i, j=S
ω̂i ω̂ j γ (s, Ti − s), γ (s, T j − s)
Tr (Ωt Γs ) ds
!
ds
(9)
We note Sn the set of symmetric matrices of size n × n. This cumulative variance is a linear form on the forward rates
covariance, with Ωt and Γs ∈ SN−S+1 constructed such that:
Ωt = ω̂ ω̂ T = (ω̂i ω̂ j )i, j∈[S,N] 0 and Γs = γ (s, Ti − s), γ (s, T j − s) i, j∈[S,N] 0
where Γs is the covariance matrix of the forward rates (or the Gram matrix of the γ (s, Ti − s) volatility function defined
above). Here swaptions are priced as basket options with constant coefficients. As detailed in Brace & Womersley
(2000) or d’Aspremont (2003), this simple approximation creates a relative error on swaption prices of 1 − 2%, which
is well within Bid-Ask spreads. Finally, we remark that caplets can be priced in the same way as one period swaptions.
2.5 Semidefinite programming
In this section we give a brief introduction to semidefinite programming.
2.5.1 Complexity
A standard form linear program can be written:
minimize cT x
subject to Ax = b
x0
in the variable x ∈ Rn , where x 0 means here x componentwise nonnegative. Because their feasible set is the intersection of an affine subspace with the convex cone of nonnegative vectors, the objective being linear, these programs are
convex. If the program is feasible, convexity guarantees the existence of a unique (up to degeneracy or unboundedness)
optimal solution.
The first method used to solve these programs in practice was the simplex method. This algorithm works well
in most cases but is known to have an exponential worst case complexity. In practice, this means that convergence
of the simplex method cannot be guaranteed. Since the work of Nemirovskii & Yudin (1979) and Karmarkar (1984)
however, we know that these programs can be solved in polynomial time by interior point methods and most modern
solver implement both techniques.
More importantly for our purposes here, the interior point methods used to prove polynomial time solvability
of linear programs have been generalized to a larger class of convex problems. One of these extensions is called
semidefinite programming. A standard form semidefinite program is written:
minimize
subject to
Tr(CX)
Tr(Ai X) = bi ,
X 0
i = 1, . . . , m
X
Tr(Ai X) = bi ,
X 0
i = 1, . . . , m
(10)
in the variable X ∈ Sn , where X 0 means here that X is positive semidefinite. Nesterov & Nemirovskii (1994) showed
that these programs can be solved in polynomial time. A number of efficient solvers are available to solve them, the
one used in this work is called SEDUMI by Sturm (1999). In practice, a program with n = 50 will be solved in less
than a second. In what follows, we will also formulate semidefinite feasibility problems:
find
subject to
4
in the variable X ∈ Sn . Their solution set is convex as the intersection of an affine subspace with the (convex) cone of
positive semidefinite matrices and a particular solution can be found by choosing an objective matrix C and solving
the corresponding semidefinite program (10). We will see below that most duality results on linear programming can
be extended to semidefinite programs.
2.5.2 Semidefinite duality
We now very briefly summarize the duality theory for semidefinite programming. We refer again the reader to Nesterov
& Nemirovskii (1994) or Boyd & Vandenberghe (2004) for a complete analysis. A standard form primal semidefinite
program is written:
minimize Tr(CX)
s.t.
Tr(Ai X) = bi , i = 1, ..., m
(11)
X 0
in the variable X ∈ SM . For X 0, y ∈ Rm , we form the following Lagrangian:
m
L(X, y) = Tr(CX) + ∑ yk (bk − Tr(Ak X))
k=1
m
= Tr
∑ (−yk Ak + C) X
k=1
!
m
+ ∑ yk b k
k=1
and because the semidefinite cone is self-dual, we find that L(X, y) is bounded below in X 0 iff:
m
C − ∑ yk A k 0
k=1
hence the dual semidefinite problem becomes:
maximize ∑m
k=1 yk bk
s.t.
C − ∑m
k=1 yk Ak 0
(12)
When the program is feasible, most solvers produce both primal and dual solutions to this problem as well as a
certificate of optimality for the solution in the form of the associated duality gap:
!!
m
µ = Tr X C − ∑ yk Ak
k=1
which is an upper bound on the absolute error. If on the other hand the program is infeasible, the dual solution provides
a Farkas type infeasibility certificate (see Boyd & Vandenberghe (2004) for details). This means that, for reasonably
large problems, semidefinite programming solvers can be used as black boxes.
2.5.3 Cone programming
The algorithms used to solve linear and semidefinite programs can be extended a little further to include second order
cone constraints. A cone program mixes linear, second order and semidefinite constraints and is written:
minimize
subject to
Tr(CX)
kd Tj vec(X) + e j k ≤ f jT vec(X) + g j ,
Tr(Ai X) = bi , i = 1, . . . , m
X 0
2
j = 1, . . . , p
in the variable X ∈ Sn , where vec(X) turns X into a vector x ∈ Rn by stacking its columns. Again, a direct extension
of the duality results above is valid for cone programs and solvers such as SEDUMI by Sturm (1999) give either both
primal and dual solutions or a certificate of infeasibility in polynomial time.
5
2.6 The calibration program
Here, we describe the practical implementation of the calibration program using the swaption pricing approximation
detailed above. This is done by discretizing in s the covariance matrix Γs . We suppose that the calibration data set
is made of m swaptions with option maturity TSk written on swaps of maturity TNk − TSk for k = 1, ..., m, with market
volatility given by σk .
2.6.1 A simple example
In the simple case where the volatility of the forwards is of the form γ (s, T − s) = γ (T − s) with γ piecewise constant
over intervals of length δ , and we are given the market price of k swaptions with σk2 Tk ∈ R+ the Black (1976) cumulative variance of swaption k written on swap(t, TSk , TNk ), the calibration problem becomes, using the approximate
swaption variance formula in (9):
find X
s.t. Tr(Ωk X) = σk2 TSk ,
X 0
k = 1, ..., m
(13)
k
δ ϕk, j with ϕk, j ∈ SM the
which is a semidefinite feasibility problem in the covariance matrix X ∈ SM and Ωk = ∑ j=1
T
rank one matrix with submatrix ω̂k ω̂k starting at element ( j, j) and all other blocks equal to zero, with M = maxk Nk .
In other words
ϕk, j j+p, j+q = ω̂k,p ω̂k,q , p, q = 1, . . . , Nk − Sk + 1
S
with all other elements equal to zero. See Brace et al. (1999) or d’Aspremont (2003) for further details.
2.6.2 The general case
Here we show that for general volatilities γ (s, T − s), the format of the calibration problem remains similar to that of
the simple example above, except that X becomes block-diagonal. In the general non-stationary case where γ is of
the form γ (s, T − s) and piecewise constant on intervals of size δ , the expression of the market cumulative variance
becomes, according to formula (9):
!
Sk
N
Z TS
2
σk TSk = ∑ δ Tr Ωk,i Xi =
∑ ω̂i ω̂ j γ (s, Ti − s), γ (s, Tj − s) ds
t
i=1
i, j=S
where Ωk,i ∈ SM−i is a block-matrix with submatrix ω̂k ω̂kT starting at element (Sk − i, Sk − i) and all other blocks equal
to zero. Here Xi is the Gram matrix of the vectors γ (Ti , T j − Ti ). Calibrating the model to the swaptions k = (1, ..., m)
can then be written as the following semidefinite feasibility problem:
find
s.t.
Xi
Sk
δ Tr Ωk,i Xi = σk2 TSk ,
∑i=1
Xi 0, i = 1, ..., M
k = 1, ..., m
with variables Xi ∈ SM−i . We can write this general problem in the same format used in the simple stationary case. Let
X be the block matrix
X1 0 .
0
0 . .
.
X =
. . .
0
0 . 0 XM
the calibration program can be written as in (13):
find X
s.t. Tr(Ω̄k X) = σk2 TSk , k = 1, ..., m
X 0, X block-diagonal
6
(14)
except that Ω̄k and X are here ”block-diagonal” matrices. We can also replace the equality constraints with Bid-Ask
spreads. In the simple case detailed in (13), the new calibration problem is then written as the following semidefinite
feasibility problem:
find X
2
2
s.t. σBid,k
TSk ≤ Tr(Ωk X) ≤ σAsk,k
TSk , k = 1, ..., m
X 0
2
2
, σAsk,k
, TSk . Again, we can rewrite this program as a semidefinite
in the variable X ∈ SM , with parameters Ωk , σBid,k
feasibility problem:
find X
s.t.
Ωk
Tr 0
0
Ωk
Tr 0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
X
0 0
0
0
0
X
0 0
−I
0
0
U1
0
0
2
0 = σAsk,k
TSk
U2
0
U1
0
0
2
0 = σBid,k
TSk ,
U2
k = 1, ..., m
X,U1 ,U2 0
in the variables X,U1 ,U2 ∈ SM , which can be summarized as
find X̃
2
TSk
s.t. Tr(Ω̃Ask,k X̃) = σAsk,k
2
Tr(Ω̃Bid,k X̃) = σBid,k TSk k = 1, ..., m
X̃ 0, X̃ block-diagonal
(15)
with X̃, Ω̃k ∈ S3M . Because of these transformations and to simplify the analysis, we will always discuss the stationary
case with equality constraints (13) in the following section, knowing that all results can be directly extended to the
general case using the block-diagonal formulation detailed above.
3 Sensitivity analysis
In this section, we show how the dual optimal solution can be exploited for computing solution sensitivities with
minimal numerical cost.
3.1 Computing sensitivities
Let us suppose that we have solved both the primal and the dual calibration problems above with market constraints
σk2 TSk and let X opt and yopt be the optimal solutions. Suppose also that the market swaption price constraints are
modified by a small amount u ∈ Rm . The new calibration problem becomes:
minimize Tr(CX)
s.t.
Tr(Ωk X) = σk2 TSk + uk
X 0
k = 1, ..., m
(16)
in the variable X ∈ SM with parameters Ωk ,C ∈ SM and σk2 TSk + uk ∈ R+ . Here C is, for example, an historical estimate
of the covariance matrix. If we note popt (u) the optimal solution to the revised problem, we get (at least formally for
now) the sensitivity of the solution to a change in market condition as:
∂ popt (0)
opt
= −yk
∂ uk
(17)
where yopt is the optimal solution to the dual problem (see Boyd & Vandenberghe (2004) for details). As we will see
in this section and the next one, this has various interpretations depending on the objective function. Here, we want to
study the variation in the solution matrix X opt , given a small change u in the market conditions.
We start with the following definition.
7
Notation 1 Let us suppose that we have solved the general calibration problem in (16), we call X opt and yopt the
primal and dual solutions to the above problem with u = 0. We note
!
m
Z opt = C − ∑ yopt
k Ωk
k=1
the dual solution matrix. As in Alizadeh, Haeberly & Overton (1998), we also define the symmetric Kronecker product
as:
1
(P ⊛ Q) K :=
PKQT + QKPT
2
We note A and A∗ , the linear operators defined by:
A : SM −→ Rm
A∗ : Rm −→ SM
and its dual
X 7−→ AX := (Tr (Ωk X))k=1,...,m
y−
7 → A∗ y := ∑m
k=1 yk Ωk
We now follow Todd & Yildirim (2001) to compute the impact ∆X on the solution of a small change in the market
price data (uk )k=1,..,m , i.e. given u small enough we compute the next Newton step ∆X. Each solver implements one
particular search direction to compute this step and we define a matrix M, with M = I in the case of the A.H.O. search
direction based on the work by Alizadeh et al. (1998), see Todd & Yildirim (2001) for other examples. We also define
the linear operators:
E = Z opt ⊛ M and F = MX opt ⊛ I
and their adjoints
E ∗ = Z opt ⊛ M and X opt M ⊛ I
We remark that if A, B ∈ SM commute, with eigenvalues α , β ∈ RM and common eigenvectors vi for i = 1, ..., M, then
A ⊛ B has eigenvalues (αi β j + α j βi ) for i, j = 1, ..., M and eigenvectors vi vTi if i = j and (vi vTj + v j vTi ) if i 6= j for
i, j = 1, ..., M. Provided the strict feasibility and nonsingularity conditions in §3 of Todd & Yildirim (2001) hold, we
can compute the Newton step ∆X as:
h
−1 i
u
(18)
∆X = E −1 FA∗ AE −1 FA∗
and this will lead to a feasible point X opt + ∆X 0 iff the market variation movement u is such that:
X opt
−1 i opt − 1
− 1 −1 ∗ h
2
2
u
E FA AE −1 FA∗
X
2
≤1
(19)
where k · k2 is the l2 norm. The intuition behind this formula is that semidefinite programming solvers are based on the
Newton method and condition (19) ensures that the solution X opt remains in the region of quadratic convergence of the
Newton algorithm. This means that only one Newton step is required to produce the new optimal solution X opt + ∆X
and (18) simply computes this step. The matrix in (18) produces a direct method for updating X which we can now
use to compute price sensitivities for any given portfolio.
This illustrates how a semidefinite programming based calibration allows to test various realistic scenarios at a
minimum numerical cost and improves on the classical non-convex methods that either had to ”bump the market data
and recalibrate” the model for every scenario with the risk of jumping from one local optimum to the next, or simulate
unrealistic market movements by directly adjusting the covariance matrix. One key question is stability: the calibration
program in (13) has a unique solution, but as usual this optimum can be very unstable and the matrix in (18) badly
conditioned. In the spirit of the work by Cont (2001) on volatility surfaces, we look in the next section for a way to
solve this conditioning issue and stabilize the calibration result.
3.2 Robustness
The previous sections were focused on how to compute the impact of a change in market conditions. Here we will focus
on how to anticipate those variations and make the calibrated matrix robust to a given set of scenarios. Depending on
the way the perturbations are modelled, this problem can remain convex and be solved very efficiently. Let us suppose
here that we want to solve the calibration problem on a set of market Bid-Ask spreads data. A direct way to address
8
the conditioning issues detailed in the last section is to use a Tikhonov stabilization of the calibration program as in
Cont (2001) and solve the following cone program:
minimize kXk2
2
2
σBid,k
TSk ≤ Tr(Ωk X) ≤ σAsk,k
TSk ,
s.t.
X 0
k = 1, ..., m
(20)
2
2
in the variable X ∈ SM with parameters Ωk ,C ∈ SM and σBid,k
TSk , σAsk,k
TSk ∈ R+ . In the absence of any information
on the uncertainty in the market data, we can simply maximize the distance between the solution and the market
bounds to ensure that it remains valid in the event of a small change in the market variance input. As the robustness
objective is equivalent to a distance maximization between the solution and the constraints (or Chebyshev centering),
the input of assumptions on the movement structure is equivalent to a choice of norm. Without any particular structural
information on the volatility market dynamics, we can use the l∞ norm and the calibration problem becomes:
maximize t
2
2
σBid,k
TSk + t ≤ Tr(Ωk X) ≤ σAsk,k
TSk − t,
s.t.
X 0
k = 1, ..., m
in the variables t ∈ R and X ∈ SM . Using the l1 norm instead, this becomes:
maximize ∑m
i=1 tk
2
2
s.t.
σBid,k
TSk + tk ≤ Tr(Ωk X) ≤ σAsk,k
TSk − tk ,
X 0
k = 1, ..., m
in the variables t1 , . . . ,tm ∈ R and X ∈ SM . The problems above optimally center the solution within the Bid-Ask
spreads, which makes it robust to a change in market conditions given no particular information on the nature of that
change. In the same vein, Ben-Tal, El Ghaoui & Lebret (1998) also show how to design a program that is robust to a
change in the matrices Ωk . However, because the matrices Ωk are computed from ratios of zero-coupon bonds, their
variance is negligible in practice compared to that of σk2 .
Suppose now that V is a statistical estimate of the daily covariance of σk2 TSk (the mid-market volatilities in this
case) and let us assume that these volatilities have a Gaussian distribution. We adapt the method used by Lobo,
Vandenberghe, Boyd & Lebret (1998) for robust L.P. We suppose that the matrix V has full rank. We can then
calibrate the model to this information:
maximize Tr(CX)
s.t.
Tr (Ωk X) − σk2TSk = vk fork = 1, ..., m
1
V−2 v
X 0
∞
≤ Φ−1 (µ )
where k·k∞ is the l∞ norm and Φ(x) is given by
1
Φ(x) = 1 − √
2π
Z x
−x
exp(−u2 /2)du
There is no guarantee that this program is feasible and we can solve instead for the best confidence level by forming
the following program:
minimize t
s.t.
Tr (Ωk X) − σk2 TSk = vk fork = 1, ..., m
1
V−2 v
X 0
∞
≤t
The optimal confidence level is then η = Φ(t) and “centers” the calibrated matrix with respect to the uncertainty in
σk2 TSk . This is a symmetric cone program and can be solved efficiently.
9
4 Hedging
In this section, we show how semidefinite programming calibration techniques can be used to build a superreplicating
portfolio, approximating the upper and lower hedging prices defined in El Karoui & Quenez (1995). An efficient technique for computing those price bounds with general non-convex payoffs on a single asset with univariate dynamics
was introduced in Avellaneda et al. (1995) and recent work on this topic by Romagnoli & Vargiolu (2000) provided
closed-form solutions for the prices of exchange options and options on the geometrical mean of two assets.
4.1 Approximate solution
Here, using the approximation in (8), we first compute arbitrage bounds on the price of a basket by adapting the
method used by Avellaneda et al. (1995) in the one-dimensional case. We then provide approximate solutions for
these arbitrage bounds on swaptions and show how one can use the dual solution to build an optimal hedging portfolio
in the sense of Avellaneda & Paras (1996), using derivative securities taken from the calibration set.
As in Avellaneda & Paras (1996), the price here is derived from a mixed static-dynamic representation:
Price = Min {Value of static hedge + Max (PV of residual liability)}
(21)
where the static hedge is a portfolio composed of the calibration assets and the maximum residual liability is computed
as in El Karoui et al. (1998) or Avellaneda et al. (1995). This hedging representation translates into the pricing problem
the market habit of calibrating a model on the instrument set that will be used in hedging. The static portfolio uses
these instrument to reduce the payoff risk, while the dynamic hedging part hedges the remaining risk in conservative
manner.
Furthermore, because of the sub-additivity of the above program with respect to payoffs, we expect this diversification of the volatility risk to bring down the total cost of hedging. Let K(t) = (K(t, Ti ))i=1,...,M and suppose we have
a set of market prices Ck for k = 1, . . . , m, of swaptions with corresponding market volatilities σk , coefficient matrices
Ωk ∈ SM and payoffs hk (K(t)). As in Avellaneda & Paras (1996) we can write the price (21) of an an additional
swaption with payoff h0 (K(t)):
"
(
#!)
m
inf
λ ∈Rm
∑ λkCk +
k=1
m
sup E P β (T )−1 h0 (K(T )) − ∑ λk β (T )−1 hk (K(T ))
P
(22)
k=1
where P varies within the set of equivalent martingale measure and β (T ) is the value of the savings account in T . We
can rewrite the above problem as:
(
!)
m
P
P
−1
−1
inf sup E β (T ) h0 (K(T )) − ∑ λk E β (T ) hk (K(T )) − Ck
λ
P
i=1
where we recognize the optimum hedging portfolio problem as the dual of the maximum price problem above:
maximize E P β (T )−1 h0 (K(T ))
s.t.
E P β (T )−1 hk (K(T )) = Ck , k = 1, ..., m
Using (8), we get an approximate solution by solving the following problem:
maximize BS0 (Tr(Ω0 X))
s.t.
BSk (Tr(Ωk X)) = Ck ,
X 0
and its dual:
(
k = 1, ..., m
m
!)
inf sup BS(Tr(Ω0 X)) − ∑ λk (BS (Tr(Ωk X)) − Ck )
λ
X0
k=1
The primal problem, after we write it in terms of variance, becomes the following semidefinite program:
2 T = Tr(Ω X)
maximize σmax
0
s.t.
Tr(Ωk X) = σk2 Tk , k = 1, ..., m
X 0
10
Again, we note yopt ∈ Rm the solution to the dual of this last problem:
2
minimize ∑m
k=1 yk σk Tk
m
s.t.
0 ∑k=1 yk Ωk − Ω0
The KKT optimality conditions on the primal-dual semidefinite program pair above (see Boyd & Vandenberghe (2004)
for example) can be written:
m
yk Ω k − Ω 0
0 ∑k=1
0 = ∑m
k=1 yk Ωk X − Ω0 X
Tr(Ω
X) = σk2 Tk , k = 1, ..., m
k
0X
and we can compare those to the KKT conditions for the price maximization problem:
∂ BSk (Tr(Ωk X))
0 X))
Z = ∂ BS0 (Tr(Ω
Ω0 + ∑m
Ωk
k=1 λk
∂v
∂v
XZ = 0
BSk (Tr(Ωk X)) = Ci , k = 1, ..., m
0 X, Z
with dual variables λ ∈ Rm and Z ∈ Sn . An optimal dual solution λk for the price maximization problem can then be
constructed from yopt , the optimal dual solution of the semidefinite program on the variance, as:
opt
λkopt = −yopt
k
∂ BS0 (Tr(Ω0 X)) /∂ v
∂ BSk (Tr(Ωk X)) /∂ v
which gives the amount of basket k in the optimal static hedging portfolio defined by (21) .
4.2 The exact problem
The bounds found in the section above are only approximate solutions to the superreplicating problem. Although the
relative error in the swaption price approximation is known to be about 1-2%, it is interesting to notice that while being
somewhat intractable, the exact problem shares the same optimization structure as the approximate one. Let us recall
the results in Romagnoli & Vargiolu (2000). If, as above, we note C(K(t),t) the superreplicating price of a basket
option, then C(K(t),t) is the solution to a multidimensional Black-Scholes-Barenblatt (BSB) equation. We can create
a superreplicating strategy by dynamically trading in a portfolio composed of ∆ti = ∂∂ Cxi (t, K(t, Ti )) in each asset. The
BSB equation in Romagnoli & Vargiolu (2000) can be rewritten in a format that is similar to that of the approximate
problem above, to become:
∂ C(x,t)
∂ 2C(x,t)
∂ t + 12 maxΓ∈Λ Tr diag(x) ∂ x2 diag(x)Γ = 0
C(x, T ) = (∑ni=1 ωi xi − k)+
where diag(x) is the diagonal matrix formed with the components of x and Γ = γγ T is the model covariance matrix.
If the set Λ is given by the intersection of the semidefinite cone (the covariance matrix has to be positive semidefinite)
with a polyhedron (for example approximate price constraints, sign constraints or bounds on the matrix coefficients,
...), then the embedded optimization problem in (Romagnoli & Vargiolu (2000)) becomes a semidefinite program:
∂ 2C(x,t)
diag(x)
max Tr Γdiag(x)
Γ∈Λ
∂ x2
on the feasible set Λ. We recover the same optimization problem as in the approximate solution found in the section
above, the only difference being here that the solution to the general problem might not be equal to a Black-Scholes
price. This gives a simple interpretation of the embedded optimization problem in the BSB equation developed in
Romagnoli & Vargiolu (2000).
11
4.3 Optimal Gamma Hedging
For simplicity here, we work in a pure equity framework and, along the lines of Douady (1995), we study the problem
of optimally adjusting the Gamma of a portfolio using only options on single assets. This problem is essentially
motivated by a difference in liquidity between the vanilla and basket option markets, which makes it impractical to
use some baskets to adjust the Gamma of a portfolio. Suppose we have an initial portfolio with a Gamma sensitivity
matrix given by Γ in a market with underlying assets xi for i = 1, . . . n. We want to hedge (imperfectly) this position
with yi vanilla options on each single asset xi with Gamma given by γi . We assume that the portfolio is maintained
delta-neutral, hence a small perturbation of the stock price will induce a change in the portfolio price given by:
1
∆P(x + ∆x) = P(x) + ∆xT Γ(y)∆x
2
where Γ(y) = Γ + diag(γ )y, with diag(γ ) the diagonal matrix with components γi . As in Douady (1995), our objective
is to minimize in y the maximum possible perturbation given by:
max ∆xT Γ(y)∆x
∆x∈E
where E is the ellipsoid defined by
E = u ∈ Rn |uT Σu = 1
with Σi j = cov(xi , x j ) for i, j = 1, . . . , n, the covariance matrix of the underlying assets. This amounts to minimizing
the maximum eigenvalue of the matrix ΣΓ(y) and can be solved by the following semidefinite program:
minimize t
subject to −tI ΣΓ + Σdiag(γ )diag(y) tI
in the variables t ∈ R and y ∈ Rn .
5 Numerical results
5.1 Price bounds
We use a data set from Nov. 6 2000 and we plot in figure (1) the upper and lower bounds obtained by maximizing (resp.
minimizing ) the volatility of a given swaption provided that the Libor covariance matrix remains positive semidefinite
and that it matches the calibration data. We calibrate by fitting all caplets up to 20 years plus the following set of
swaptions: 2Y into 5Y, 5Y into 5Y, 5Y into 2Y, 10Y into 5Y, 7Y into 5Y, 10Y into 2Y, 10Y into 7Y, 2Y into 2Y. This
choice of swaptions was motivated by liquidity (where all swaptions on underlying and maturity in 2Y, 5Y, 7Y, 10Y
are meant to be liquid). For simplicity, all frequencies are annual. For each (Maturity,Underlying) pair in figure (1),
we solve the semidefinite program detailed in (13):
find X
s.t. Tr(Ωk X) = σk2 TSk ,
X 0
k = 1, ..., m
in the variable X ∈ S20 , where σk and Ωk are computed as in (13) using the data in Table (1) and (2). The programs are
solved using the SEDUMI code by Sturm (1999). We then compare these upper and lower bounds (dotted lines) with
the actual market volatility (solid line). Quite surprisingly considering the simplicity of the model (stationarity of the
sliding Libor dynamics L(t, θ )), figure (1) shows that all swaptions seem to fit reasonably well in the bounds imposed
by the model, except for the 7Y and 10Y underlying. This is in line with the findings of Longstaff et al. (2000).
5.2 Super-replication & calibration stability
Here, we compare the performance and stability of the various calibration methodologies detailed here and in Rebonato
(1999). For simplicity, we neglect the different changes of measure between forward measures and work with a
multivariate lognormal model where the underlying assets xi,t for i = 1, . . . , 5 follow:
1
dxi,s /xi,s = σi dWs − σiT σi ds
2
12
(23)
Sydney Opera House Effect
16%
15%
14%
13%
Upper Bound
Market
Lower Bound
12%
11%
10%
9%
(7Y , 10Y)
(10Y , 10Y)
(5Y , 10Y)
(4Y , 10Y)
(3Y , 10Y)
(2Y , 10Y)
(7Y , 7Y)
(10Y , 7Y)
(5Y , 7Y)
(4Y , 7Y)
(3Y , 7Y)
(2Y , 7Y)
(7Y , 5Y)
(10Y , 5Y)
(5Y , 5Y)
(4Y , 5Y)
(3Y , 5Y)
(2Y , 5Y)
(7Y , 4Y)
(10Y , 4Y)
(5Y , 4Y)
(4Y , 4Y)
(3Y , 4Y)
(2Y , 4Y)
(7Y , 3Y)
(10Y , 3Y)
(5Y , 3Y)
(4Y , 3Y)
(3Y , 3Y)
(2Y , 3Y)
(7Y , 2Y)
(10Y , 2Y)
(5Y , 2Y)
(4Y , 2Y)
(3Y , 2Y)
(2Y , 2Y)
8%
Swaption (Maturity, Underlying)
Figure 1: Calibration result and price bounds on a ”Sydney opera house” set of swaptions.
Caplet Vols (%, 1Y to 10Y)
Caplet Vols (%, 11Y to 20Y)
14.3
13.0
15.6
12.7
15.4
12.4
15.1
12.2
14.8
12.0
14.5
11.9
14.2
11.8
14.0
11.8
0.13
0.12
Table 1: Caplet volatilities.
Swaption
2Y into 5Y
5Y into 5Y
5Y into 2Y
10Y into 5Y
7Y into 5Y
10Y into 2Y
10Y into 7Y
2Y into 2Y
Vol (%)
12.4
11.7
14.0
10.0
11.0
12.2
9.6
14.8
ω̂i
0.22
0.22
0.51
0.22
0.23
0.51
0.17
0.52
0.20
0.21
0.49
0.21
0.21
0.49
0.16
0.48
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.18
0.18
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.18
0.18
0.15
0.14
0.13
Table 2: Swaption volatilities and weights (data courtesy of BNP Paribas, London).
13
13.9
11.7
13.3
12.0
where Ws is a B.M. of dimension 5. At time 0, we set xi,0 = .1 and the covariance matrix σ T σ is given by:
0.0144 0.0133 0.0074 0.0029 0.0013
0.0133 0.0225 0.0151 0.0063 0.0032
0.0074 0.0151 0.0144 0.0065 0.0032
0.0029 0.0063 0.0065 0.0081 0.0027
0.0013 0.0032 0.0032 0.0027 0.0036
We then compare the performance of a delta hedging strategy implemented using various calibration techniques. In
each case, we hedge a short position in an ATM basket option with coefficients w0 = (0, 0, .4, .1, .5), calibrating the
model on all single asset ATM calls and an ATM basket with weight w6 = (1, 1, 0, 0, 0), the weights w1 , . . . , w5 being
then equal to the Euclidean basis. All options have maturity one year and we rebalance the hedging portfolio 33 times
over this period. At each time step, we calibrate to these option prices computed using the model in (23). To test the
stability of the calibration techniques, we add a uniformly distributed noise to the calibration prices with amplitude
equal to ±10% of the original price.
We use four different calibration techniques to get the covariance matrices and compute the deltas. In the first
one, we use the exact model covariance above to compute baseline results. In the second one, we use the simple
stabilization technique detailed in (20) and solve:
minimize kXk2
s.t.
Tr(Ωk X) = σk2 TSk ,
X 0
k = 1, ..., 6
(24)
in the variable X, where σk and the matrices Ωk for k = 1, . . . , 6 are computed from w1 , . . . , w6 as in (13). In the third
one, we use the super replication technique detailed in §4.1 and calibrate the covariance matrix by solving
maximize Tr(Ω0 X)
s.t.
Tr(Ωk X) = σk2 TSk ,
X 0
k = 1, ..., 6
(25)
in the variable X, where σk and the matrices Ωk for k = 0, . . . , 6 are computed from w0 , . . . , w6 as in (13). Finally,
our fourth calibrated covariance matrix is calibrated using the two factor parametrized best fit technique detailed in
Rebonato (1999).
For each calibration technique, we record the ratio of the delta hedging portfolio’s P&L to the initial option premium at every time step. In figure (2), we plot the P&L distributions for the super-hedging strategy (25) and the
Rebonato (1999) calibration technique. We notice that while discrete hedging error makes the super-replication somewhat imperfect, the super-hedging calibration technique has a much higher P&L on average than the best fit calibration
in Rebonato (1999). Furthermore, the super-hedging calibration produces a positive P&L in 68% of the sample scenarios, while the parametrized calibration has a positive P&L in only 41% of them.
Finally, in table (2) we detail some summary statistics on the relative P&L of the four calibration techniques
detailed above and on the change in covariance matrix between time steps. In this table, “mean change” is the average
norm of the change in the calibration matrix at each time step, while “Mean P&L” and “StDev” are the mean and
standard deviation of the ratio of the hedging portfolio’s P&L to the option premium. Finally, the “real covariance”
calibration technique uses the actual model covariance matrix to compute the delta, the “robust” technique uses the
solution to (24), the “super-hedging” one uses the solution to (25), while the “parametrized” uses the parametric
algorithm described in Rebonato (1999).
Calibration method
Mean P&L
StDev P&L
Mean change (10−5)
Real covariance
-0.002
0.253
0
Robust
0.083
0.338
3.11
Super-Hedging
0.137
0.344
3.36
Parameterized
-0.109
0.316
4.77
Table 3: Hedging P&L and covariance stability statistics for various calibration techniques.
We notice that, as expected, the super hedging strategy improves the average P&L. However, while the robust
calibration algorithm does show a smaller average change in calibrated covariance matrix, this does not translate
14
Figure 2: P&L distribution for the super-hedging (light) and the parametric (dark) calibration techniques.
into significantly smaller hedging P&L standard deviation. This is perhaps due to the fact that the basket options
considered here are not sensitive enough for these changes in the covariance to have a significant impact on the
hedging performance.
6 Conclusion
The results above have showed how semidefinite programming based calibration methods provide integrated calibration and risk-management results with guaranteed numerical performance, the dual program having a very natural
interpretation in terms of hedging instruments and sensitivity. Furthermore, these techniques make possible the numerical computation of super-hedging strategies (detailed in section 4.1), which seem to perform well in our simulation
examples.
References
Alizadeh, F., Haeberly, J. A. & Overton, M. L. (1998), ‘Primal–dual interior–point methods for semidefinite programming: Convergence rates, stability and numerical results’, SIAM Journal on Optimization 8, 746–768.
Avellaneda, M., Levy, A. & Paras, A. (1995), ‘Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain
volatilities’, Applied Mathematical Finance 2, 73–88.
Avellaneda, M. & Paras, A. (1996), ‘Managing the volatility risk of portfolios of derivative securities: the lagrangian
uncertain volatility model’, Applied Mathematical Finance 3, 21–52.
Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L. & Lebret, H. (1998), Robust semidefinite programming, in S. Sastry, H. Wolkowitcz &
L. Vandenberghe, eds, ‘Handbook on Semidefinite Programming’, Vol. 27 of International Series in Operations
Research and Management Science.
15
Black, F. (1976), ‘The pricing of commodity contracts.’, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 167–179.
Boyd, S. & Vandenberghe, L. (2004), Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press.
Brace, A., Dun, T. & Barton, G. (1999), ‘Towards a central interest rate model’, Working Paper. FMMA .
Brace, A., Gatarek, D. & Musiela, M. (1997), ‘The market model of interest rate dynamics’, Mathematical Finance
7(2), 127–155.
Brace, A. & Womersley, R. S. (2000), ‘Exact fit to the swaption volatility matrix using semidefinite programming’,
Working paper, ICBI Global Derivatives Conference .
Cont, R. (2001), ‘Inverse problems in financial modeling: theoretical and numerical aspects of model calibration.’,
Lecture Notes, Princeton University. .
d’Aspremont, A. (2003), Interest Rate Model Calibration and Risk-Management Using Semidefinite Programming,
PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique.
Douady, R. (1995), ‘Optimisation du gamma d’une option sur panier ou sur spread en l’absence d’options croisées.’,
Working paper .
El Karoui, N., Jeanblanc-Picqué, M. & Shreve, S. E. (1998), ‘On the robustness of the black-scholes equation’, Mathematical Finance 8, 93–126.
El Karoui, N. & Quenez, M. (1995), ‘Dynamic programming and pricing of contingent claims in an incomplete
market’, Siam Journal of Control and Optimization 33, 29–66.
Heath, D., Jarrow, R. & Morton, A. (1992), ‘Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology’,
Econometrica 61(1), 77–105.
Huynh, C. B. (1994), ‘Back to baskets’, Risk 7(5).
Jamshidian, F. (1997), ‘Libor and swap market models and measures’, Finance and Stochastics 1(4), 293–330.
Karmarkar, N. K. (1984), ‘A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming’, Combinatorica 4, 373–395.
Kawai, A. (2002), ‘Analytical and monte-carlo swaption pricing under the forward swap measure’, Journal of Computational Finance 6(1), 101–111.
Kurbanmuradov, O., Sabelfeld, K. & Schoenmakers, J. (2002), ‘Lognormal approximations to libor market models’,
Journal of Computational Finance 6(1), 69–100.
Lobo, M., Vandenberghe, L., Boyd, S. & Lebret, H. (1998), ‘Applications of second-order cone programming’, Linear
Algebra and its Applications 284, 193–228. Special Issue on Linear Algebra in Control, Signals and Image
Processing.
Longstaff, F. A., Santa-Clara, P. & Schwartz, E. S. (2000), ‘The relative valuation of caps and swaptions: Theory and
empirical evidence.’, Working Paper, The Anderson School at UCLA. .
Miltersen, K., Sandmann, K. & Sondermann, D. (1997), ‘Closed form solutions for term structure derivatives with
log-normal interest rates’, Journal of Finance 52(1), 409–430.
Musiela, M. & Rutkowski, M. (1997), Martingale methods in financial modelling, Vol. 36 of Applications of mathematics, Springer, Berlin.
Nemirovskii, A. S. & Yudin, D. B. (1979), ‘Problem complexity and method efficiency in optimization’, Nauka (published in English by John Wiley, Chichester, 1983) .
Nesterov, Y. & Nemirovskii, A. (1994), Interior-point polynomial algorithms in convex programming, Society for
Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Rebonato, R. (1998), Interest-Rate Options Models, Financial Engineering, Wiley.
16
Rebonato, R. (1999), ‘On the simultaneous calibration of multi-factor log-normal interest rate models to black volatilities and to the correlation matrix.’, QUARCH Working paper, www.rebonato.com .
Romagnoli, S. & Vargiolu, T. (2000), ‘Robustness of the black-scholes approach in the case of options on several
assets’, Finance and Stochastics 4, 325–341.
Sandmann, K. & Sondermann, D. (1997), ‘A note on the stability of lognormal interest rate models and the pricing of
eurodollar futures’, Mathematical Finance 7, 119–128.
Schwartz, S. C. & Yeh, Y. S. (1981), ‘On the distribution function and moments of power sums with log-normal
components.’, The Bell System Technical Journal 61(7), 1441–1462.
Sturm, J. F. (1999), ‘Using sedumi 1.0x, a matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones’, Optimization
Methods and Software 11, 625–653.
Todd, M. & Yildirim, E. A. (2001), ‘Sensitivity analysis in linear programming and semidefinite programming using
interior-points methods.’, Mathematical Programming 90(2), 229–261.
17
| 5cs.CE
|
Control of complex networks requires both structure
and dynamics
Alexander J. Gates1,2+ and Luis M. Rocha1,2,3*
1 School
of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
3
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia, Oeiras, Portugal
+ [email protected]
* [email protected]
arXiv:1509.08409v2 [q-bio.MN] 18 Apr 2016
2 Program
ABSTRACT
The study of network structure has uncovered signatures of the organization of complex systems. However, there is also a
need to understand how to control them; for example, identifying strategies to revert a diseased cell to a healthy state, or
a mature cell to a pluripotent state. Two recent methodologies suggest that the controllability of complex systems can be
predicted solely from the graph of interactions between variables, without considering their dynamics: structural controllability and minimum dominating sets. We demonstrate that such structure-only methods fail to characterize controllability when
dynamics are introduced. We study Boolean network ensembles of network motifs as well as three models of biochemical regulation: the segment polarity network in Drosophila melanogaster, the cell cycle of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae,
and the floral organ arrangement in Arabidopsis thaliana. We demonstrate that structure-only methods both undershoot and
overshoot the number and which sets of critical variables best control the dynamics of these models, highlighting the importance of the actual system dynamics in determining control. Our analysis further shows that the logic of automata transition
functions, namely how canalizing they are, plays an important role in the extent to which structure predicts dynamics.
Introduction
Complex systems are typically understood as large nonlinear systems. Their organization and behavior can be modeled by
representations such as graphs and collections of automata. Graphs are useful to capture the structure of interactions between
variables: the static organization of complex systems. However, nodes representing variables in graphs lack intrinsic dynamics.
The simplest way to study nonlinear dynamics is to allow network nodes to have discrete states and update them with automata;
for instance, Boolean Networks (BNs) are canonical models of complex systems which exhibit a wide range of interesting
behaviors.1
The study of network structure has uncovered several organizing principles of complex systems — such as scale-free
networks and community structure — and how they constrain system behavior, without explicit dynamical rules for node
variables.2 There is, however, a need to control complex systems, in addition to characterizing their organization. This
is particularly true in systems biology and medicine, where increasingly accurate models of biochemical regulation have
been produced.3–6 More than understanding the organization of biochemical regulation, we need to derive control strategies
that allow us, for instance, to revert a mutant cell to a wild-type state,7 or a mature cell to a pluripotent state.8 While the
identification of such control strategies occurs for a given model, not the real system, predictions from control theory can be
used for model verification and thus also aid the separate question of the accuracy of that model in predicting the real system.
Network structure has been reported to predict properties of dynamics, such as the synchronization of connected limit-cycle
oscillators,9 or the likelihood of robust attractors.10 On the other hand, there are important system attributes which depend on
dynamical characteristics of variables and their interactions; e.g. the critical transition between ordered and chaotic dynamics
in BNs depends both on structural (mean connectivity) and dynamical properties of nodes (bias and canalization).11–14 Indeed, we already know that such dynamical properties strongly impact the stability, robustness, and controllability of existing
models of gene regulation and biochemical signaling in a number of organisms.7, 15–18 Therefore, a question of central importance remains: How well does network structure predict the dynamics of the underlying complex system, especially from the
viewpoint of control?
Recently, two related methodologies were used to predict the controllability of complex networks based solely on network
structure without consideration of the dynamical properties of variables: structural controllability (SC)19, 20 and minimum
dominating set (MDS).21, 22 Both techniques reduce dynamical systems to graphs where edges denote an interaction between
a pair of variables. Using only graph connectivity, the goal is to identify a minimal set of driver variables (a.k.a. driver nodes)
which can fully control system dynamics.23
SC assumes that, in the absence of cycles, a variable can control at most one of its neighbors in the structural interaction
graph.19, 20 The influence from an intervention on a node then propagates along a backbone of directed paths, where the
number of necessary paths to cover the network dictates the minimum set of driver variables (see Supplemental Material,
SM). Cycles are considered to be self-regulatory and do not require an external control signal. SC has become an influential
method, having been used to suggest that biological systems are harder to control and have appreciably different control
profiles than social or technological systems.24, 25 The methodology has also been used to identify key banks in interbank
lending networks,26 and to relate circular network motifs to control in transcription regulatory networks.27 However, despite
its successful characterization of observability (a dual notion to controllability) in several nonlinear dynamical systems,28 SC’s
application to models of biological and social systems has been heavily critiqued due to its stringent assumptions.29–31
MDS starts from the different assumption that each node can influence all of its neighbors simultaneously, but this signal
cannot propagate any further. Driver variables are then identified by the minimal set such that every variable is separated by
at most one interaction.21, 22 It has been used to identify control variables in protein interaction networks32 and characterize
how disease genes perturb the Human regulatory network.33
Because both MDS and SC use only the interaction graph of complex systems, unless otherwise specified, we use structural control to refer to both methods. Since these methods are increasingly used in a variety of scientific domains, it is
important to study how much network structure predicts the controllability of realistic, nonlinear dynamical systems.
Here, we explore this problem using ensembles of BNs. These canonical models of complex systems are defined by
a network of interconnected automata (the structure), and exhibit a wide range of dynamical behaviors.1 They have been
used to model biochemical regulation in organisms, where dynamical attractors represent cell types, disease and healthy
states.6, 34 It is well known that when the set of system variables is large, enumeration of the state-spaces of BNs becomes
difficult, making the control problem for general deterministic BNs computationally intractable (NP-hard).35 However, for
small systems we can fully enumerate the state-space and compute the actual controllability (as measured by three proposed
measures of controllability) for parameterized ensembles of BNs.
Our analysis is not meant to introduce alternative techniques to uncover control variables in BNs, since methods based on
system dynamics already exist.7, 8, 36–42 The goal is to quantify the discrepancy between control as uncovered by approximate
methods that use structure alone, from how actual control unfolds in BNs. Additionally, we characterize critical variables for
the control of three models of biochemical regulation: the single-cell segment polarity network in Drosophila melanogaster,
the eukaryotic cell cycle of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the floral organ arrangement in the flowering plant
Arabidopsis thaliana. Our results demonstrate that network structure is not sufficient to characterize the controllability of
complex systems; predictions based on structural control can both under- and over-estimate the number and set of necessary
driver variables. Therefore, previous assertions about the controllability of biochemical systems reached from analyses based
on structural control methods do not offer a realistic portrayal of control.24, 25
Quantifying Control in Boolean Networks
Background
Boolean Networks (BNs) are discrete dynamical systems X ≡ {xi } of N Boolean variables xi ∈ {0, 1}. Interactions between
variables are represented as a directed adjacency graph, the structural network: G = (X, E), where edges e ji ∈ E denote
that variable x j is an input to variable xi . Furthermore, Xi ≡ {x j ∈ X : e ji ∈ E} and |Xi | = ki denote the input set and the
in-degree of variable xi , respectively. Here, variables are updated synchronously according to deterministic logical functions:
fi : {0, 1}ki → {0, 1}, such that xt+1
= fi (Xit ⊆ X), where Xit denotes the state of the inputs to xi at time t ∈ N.
i
At time t, the network is in a configuration of states X t , which is a vector of all variable states xti at t. The set of all possible
network configurations is denoted by X ≡ {0, 1}N , where |X | = 2N . The complete dynamical behavior of the system for all
initial conditions is captured by the state-transition graph (STG): G = (X , T ), where each node is a configuration Xα ∈ X ,
and an edge Tα ,β ∈ T denotes that a system in configuration Xα at time t will be in configuration Xβ at time t + 1. Under
deterministic dynamics, only a single transition edge Tα ,β is allowed out of every configuration node Xα . Because G is finite,
it contains at least one attractor, as some configuration or cycle of configurations must repeat in time.43 An exemplar STG is
shown in Figure 1 (top, left).
Control Measures
We study the control exerted on the dynamics of a BN by a subset of driver variables D ⊆ X. Here, control interventions are
instantaneous bit-flip perturbations to the state of the variables in D.44 To capture all possible trajectories due to controlled
interventions on D, we introduce the controlled state transition graph (CSTG): GD = (X , T ∪TD ). The CSTG is an extension
of the STG, where a set of additional edges TD denotes transitions from every configuration to each of its possible 2|D| − 1
2/15
STG G
100
010
101
110
011
001
CSTG G{x
010
1}
100
101
110
011
001
Variable Logic
x1
x2
x3
x1
x1 v x2
CAG C{x
1}
111
000
CSTG G{x
010
2}
111
011
111
000
CSTG G{x
3}
010
000
011
CAG C{x
2}
111
000
100
101
110
001
100
101
110
001
CAG C{x
3}
111
000
111
111
000
000
Figure 1. The state transition graph (STG) and the controlled variants (CSTG) for an exemplar Boolean Network using the
Feed-Forward network structure (Figure 2A), with the logical transition functions given in the upper right. Configurations are
shown as green nodes, attractors are highlighted green nodes, and transitions are illustrated as solid black arrows. The CSTG
GD for the three singleton driver variable sets D ≡ {x1 }, {x2 }, {x3 } are shown with controlled transitions denoted by dashed,
orange arrows. The controlled attractor graphs CAG CD are also depicted for the singleton driver variable sets with the
attractors shown as purple highlighted nodes and dashed orange arrows denoting the existence of at least one perturbed
transition between attractor basins (if any exist).
perturbed counterparts. In Figure 1, three examples of CSTG are shown with interventions to only one of the three variables:
D = {x1 }, {x2 }, {x3 }.
From the point of view of control theory,19, 45 the dynamics of a network of variables X is controllable by interventions to a
subset of driver variables D ⊂ X when every configuration is reachable from every other configuration in GD . A configuration
Xβ is reachable from Xα if a directed path from Xα to Xβ exists.45 For BN this is equivalent to requiring that the CSTG GD
be strongly connected. To measure how much control D can exert, we tally the fraction of configurations that are reachable
by interventions to D. Given a configuration Xα , the fraction of reachable configurations r(GD , Xα ) is the number of other
configurations Xβ lying on all directed paths from Xα , normalized by the total number of other configurations 2N−1 . The
mean fraction of reachable configurations:
RD =
1
2N
∑
r(GD , Xα )
(1)
Xα ∈X
measures the proportion of configurations which are on average reachable by controlling the set of driver variables D. When
a network is fully controlled by D, RD = 1.0, but for partially controlled networks RD ∈ [0.0, 1.0).
Notice that R0/ ≥ 0, because the STG G of a network (D ≡ 0)
/ naturally contains transitions between configurations. Therefore, it is useful to measure the control exerted by a set of driver variables D beyond the uncontrolled dynamics. To this end,
we introduce the mean fraction of controlled configurations:
CD = RD − R0/
(2)
It measures the fraction of configurations which are on average reachable by controlling the driver variables D that were not
already reachable via the natural dynamics. By definition, CD ≤ RD for any system and set of driver variables.
In practice, only certain subsets of configurations are meaningful. These subsets are typically cast as either attractors for the
system dynamics or specific trajectories through the state space. Consider the case of BNs as models of biochemical regulation;
attractors represent different cell types,1, 29, 46 diseased or normal conditions,47 and wild-type or mutant phenotypes.7 In this
context, the formal sense of controllability is well beyond what is necessary. What is most relevant for some systems is to
uncover the driver variables which can steer dynamics from attractor to attractor; transient configurations are irrelevant.
To measure this more realistic sense of control, we introduce the controlled attractor graph (CAG): CD = (A , BD ). In
this graph, each node Aκ ∈ A represents an attractor. A basin edge bκγ ∈ BD , denotes the existence of at least one path from
attractor Aκ to attractor Aγ . In Figure 1 (right-side), three examples of CAGs are shown. The mean fraction of reachable
attractors is then given by
AD =
1
r(CD , Aκ )
|A | Aκ∑
∈A
(3)
where κ = 1 . . . |A |. It measures the fraction of attractors which are on average reachable by controlling the driver variables
in D. A network which can be controlled from any of its attractors to any of its attractors must have AD = 1.0; when D ≡ 0,
/
3/15
A
B
C
x1
x2
x3
E
x2
x3
F
x2
x3
x1
x2
x1
x2
x3
x1
x2
G
x1
x1
I
D
x1
x1
x2
x3
x2
x3
H
x3
x1
x2
x3
J
x2
x4
x1
x3
x4
x3
x4
Figure 2. Directed network structure motifs used in this study: A) Feed-Forward motif, B) Chain motif, C) Loop motif, D)
Loop motif with self-interactions, E) Fan motif, F) Co-regulated motif, G) Co-regulating motif, H) BiParallel motif, I) BiFan
motif, and J) Dominated Loop motif.
all attractors reside in disconnected basins in the original STG so A0/ = 0.0. Naturally, if a network is fully controllable by D
in the control theory sense (RD = 1.0), AD = 1.0.
Control Portraits of Complex Systems
Boolean Network Ensembles
Given the structural network G = (X, E) for a BN, many different logical functions fi can be assigned to each Boolean variable
xi (see Background). An ensemble of BNs is constructed by considering all possible logical functions constrained by the fixed
structure G48, 49 (see SM). However, since non-contingent functions (e.g. tautology and contradiction) are not found in most
biological models, we divide the full ensemble into contingent and non-contingent subsets as follows: those BNs which only
contain contingent functions and those BNs which contain at least one non-contingent transition function (NC).
Within the set of contingent functions, there are canalizing functions which depend only on a subset of their input variables.16, 50 These functions are ubiquitous in BN models of gene regulation and contribute mechanisms of functional redundancy and degeneracy.7, 18 The redundancy of some logical functions means that the effective structure of interactions is
reduced:7, 14 some edges of the structural graph G play no role in determining the transitions between configurations.
Since control methodologies based on network structure assume that all interactions (edges) in the structural network are
relevant for system dynamics, we further subdivide the contingent subset into two disjoint subsets: BNs which contain fully
canalizing functions and thus possess a reduced effective structure (RES), and those without canalizing functions retaining a
full effective structure (FES). Naturally, the FES subset is the scenario most coherent with the idea of using structure to predict
controllability, since all interactions in the underlying structural graph G are dynamically relevant.
Network Motifs
We first consider the entire ensemble of BNs with simple structural graphs known as network motifs.51 These prototype
networks have been useful for exploring the relationship between structure and dynamics of complex networks.52, 53 The
motifs considered in our analysis are depicted in Figure 2.
Consider the Feed-Forward network motif of N = 3 variables54 shown in Figure 2A. In this case, the full ensemble consists
of 64 distinct BNs of which 36 are NC, 8 have RES, and 20 have FES. Figure 1 depicts the logic of one FES network instance
for this motif, along with its STG, CSTGs, and CAGs for various driver sets D. The control portrait of the full BN ensemble
is shown in Figure 3; control measures RD and C D are shown for all possible driver sets of one or two variables.
Using solely this motif’s interaction network, structural control (both the SC and MDS methods) predicts that variable x1
is capable of fully controlling the network. However, our analysis reveals that this driver variable can fully control only 8
networks from the ensemble (4 RES and 4 FES), while the other 56 BNs (with the same structure) are not fully controlled
(Figure 3). It is noteworthy that even when considering the FES subset — the scenario most coherent with the idea of using
structure to predict the controllability of the dynamics — only 4 out of 20 BNs are fully controlled by interventions on x1 . It
is clear that even in the case of such a simple motif, structure does not predict the control of dynamics. An extended analysis
of the controlled Feed-Forward BN ensemble is provided in the SM.
4/15
Mean Fraction of Reachable Conf gurations (R D )
F
R
1.0
0.5
0.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.00.0 0.5 1.0
Mean Fraction of Controlled Conf gurations (C D )
Figure 3. Control portrait of the BN ensemble constrained by the Feed-Forward network motif. The mean fraction of
reachable configurations RD and the mean fraction of controllable configurations C D for the full ensemble of 64 BNs with
structure given by the Feed-Forward network motif shown in Figure 2A, as controlled by all driver variable sets of one or two
variables. The full effective structure (FES) subset is highlighted by red circles, the reduced effective structure (RES) subset
is shown in blue squares, and the non-contingent subset (NC) is shown by green diamonds; the area of the object corresponds
to the number of networks at that point.
Let us now consider the N = 3 variable loop motif with self-interactions (Figure 2D). The full ensemble of BNs constrained
by this motif is much larger than the previous example (every variable has ki = 2 inputs); it consists of 4096 networks of which
1352 are NC, 1744 have RES, and 1000 have FES. Figure 4A shows the control portrait of this motif’s BN ensemble for a
single (D ≡ {xi }) or pair (D ≡ {xi , x j }) of driver variables. The control portrait of the STG illustrates the difference between
the two measures of controllability. While RD varies greatly, CD = 0 for all BNs. This means that in some BNs, many
configurations can be reached simply because the transient dynamics move through many network configurations. Structural
control methodologies ignore this natural propensity for control (self-organization). Thus we use the measure CD to tally only
the proportion of transitions that result from control interventions.
The control portraits in Figure 4 again demonstrate that structure fails to characterize network control. In this case, SC
predicts that any single variable is sufficient for full controllability, while MDS requires any two variables to achieve the same.
Yet controllability varies greatly for both cases, depending on the particular transition functions of each BN in the ensemble.
For 77% of the BNs in the ensemble a single variable is not capable of fully controlling dynamics; even two-variable driver
sets fail to control 44% of the BNs.
Similar results hold for the mean fraction of reachable attractors (AD ) shown in Figure 4B (middle, right). For 36% of
the BNs in the ensemble, a single variable is not capable of fully controlling the system between attractors; even two-variable
driver sets fail to control 20% of the BNs, regardless of the dynamical subset. Discounting the 1868 networks (Figure 4B, left)
with only one attractor (hence AD = 1) further emphasizes the variation in attractor control, increasing the above proportions
to 65% and 36% for one and two driver variables, respectively. Therefore, even if we analyze controllability from the point
of view of attractor control rather than the stringent criteria of full controllability, single- and two-variable driver sets fail to
achieve controllability of all networks in this ensemble.
The control portraits of the other network motifs analyzed are presented in the Supplemental Material. Their analysis
supports the same conclusion: predictions made from structure-only methods are only true for a small number of possible
BNs. In general, they fail to predict the actual controllability of all the BN dynamics that can occur for a given motif structure.
5/15
Models of biochemical regulation
To better understand the interplay between structure and dynamics in the context of controlling complex systems, we study
three BN models from systems biology which are considerably larger than the network motifs of the previous section.
Drosophila melanogaster
During the early ontogenesis of the fruit fly, the specification of adult cell types is controlled by a hierarchy of a few genes.
The Albert and Othmer segment polarity network (SPN) is a BN model55 capable of predicting the steady-state patterns
experimentally observed in wild-type and mutant embryonic development with significant accuracy. Here, we analyze the
single-cell SPN consisting of 17 gene and protein variables (see SM).
Previous analysis has shown that the SPN model is controlled by the upstream value of the Sloppy Pair Protein (SLP) and
the extra-cellular signals of the Hedgehog and Wingless proteins from neighboring cells nhh/nHH and nWG.55 The control
portrait of this model also demonstrates that these three variables (driver set S 0 in Figure 5) are capable of fully controlling
the dynamics from any attractor to any other attractor. This is to be expected in segment polarity regulation since it is a highly
orchestrated developmental process. The attractor control ability of individual nodes of the SPN in the inset of Figure 5 further
highlights this behavior, only the 3 chemical species mentioned above have a high AD when controlled alone, while all internal
variables have negligible influence.
The SC analysis of the SPN’s structural graph identifies 4 subsets of |D| = 4 driver variables, indicated in Figure 5 by
enlarged red circles and labeled S 1, S 2, S 3 and S 4 (details in SM). S 0 is a subset of these 4 variable subsets, so naturally
they also achieve AD = 1, but they all include an additional variable which is redundant for this purpose. However, none
of these subsets are sufficient for fully controlling the BN as predicted by SC, these driver sets can control dynamics only
to a very small proportion of configurations; RD≡S 4 ≈ 0.071 is the maximum value attained. These 4 driver sets also show
considerable variation in RD , demonstrating that predictions with equivalent support from the point of view of the SC theory,
lead to distinct amounts of real controllability. Interestingly, there are 5 driver variable sets of size |D| = 4 that lead to greater
controllability (with a maximum of RD ≈ CD ≈ 0.124) than predicted by SC. Thus, SC fails to even correctly predict the
4-variable driver sets with greatest controllability.
The MDS analysis of the SPN model predicts that |D| = 7 variables are required to fully control the system dynamics and
uncovers 8 equivalent driver variable sets of this size (see SM). Not surprisingly, all of the MDS driver variable sets achieve
full attractor control (AD = 1) since they contain S 0; however, none can fully control the network dynamics achieving only
a maximum RD ≈ 0.31. Thus, the driver sets predicted by both SC and MDS are not sufficient to control dynamics in the
control theory sense, and predict more variables than necessary to achieve attractor control.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
The eukaryotic cell cycle process of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reflects the cyclical gene expression activity
that leads to cell division. Here, we use the 12 variable simplified Boolean model of the yeast Cell-Cycle Network (CCN)
derived by Li et al.17 The SC analysis of the CCN interaction graph identifies only one driver variable (Y 0 = {CellSize}) to be
sufficient for fully controlling the BN’s dynamics. Yet, as demonstrated in Figure 6A, it only achieves negligible configuration
control (RY 0 ≈ 0.021) and very weak attractor control (AY 0 ≈ 0.19). Similarly, MDS analysis identifies 8 driver variable sets
of size |D| = 4 (Y 1 to Y 8), none of which achieve full control. It is particularly interesting that the driver sets predicted by
MDS lead to values of both AD and RD that are essentially random, demonstrating once again that predictions with equivalent
support from the point of view of the structure-only theories lead to widely different amounts of real controllability. Our
analysis finds 3 driver sets of |D| = 4 variables that achieve full attractor control (highlighted in yellow in Figure 6A and
detailed in SM). Neither SC nor MDS predict those specific driver sets, which ultimately provide the most useful form of
control in such systems. Unlike the SPN, there are no “chief controller” variables in this network, as most variables achieve a
similar value of AD when controlled alone (see inset in Figure 6A).
The CCN was designed such that there is a large attractor basin towards a wild-type attractor which is robust to perturbation.17, 44 However, our analysis illuminates the tradeoff between robustness and flexibility in relation to system controllability.
While a large basin of attraction facilitates controlling the system towards the wild-type behavior (high wild-type robustness),
it also reduces the ability to control the system to other smaller basins of attraction (mutant phenotypic behavior), reflecting a
tradeoff between wild-type robustness and low flexibility for potential evolvability (a property that was not initially designed
into the model to begin with). This tradeoff is further elaborated by the CAGs for all single-variable driver sets, shown in
Figure 6B. Some variables have a propensity to control the system towards the wild-type attractor (green node) or allow the
system to remain there (e.g. Cln3, Clb5, 6, Clb1, 2, Mcm1/SFF, Cdc20/14), while only a few can control the system out of
this attractor (e.g. CellSize, SBF, Cln1, 2). See SM for more details.
A third model of biochemical regulation in the floral organ arrangement in the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana was
analyzed, leading to a similar failure to predict actual control (see SM for details).
6/15
Canalization and Controllability
When fully canalizing functions are present in a BN, not all of the edges in the structural graph contribute to the collective
dynamics; there exists a subgraph that fully captures the dynamically relevant interactions (an effective structural graph).7, 14
Moreover, most Boolean functions are partially canalizing7, 50 whereby in some input conditions a subset of inputs is redundant, but in other conditions it is not. This means that most edges in the underlying structural graph of a random BN are either
entirely or partially redundant.
Since structural controllability methods assume that every edge of the underlying structure fully contributes to the dynamics, it is reasonable to suspect that the larger the mismatch between the structural graph and the effective structural graph, the
more the predictions from SC and MDS will fail. To study this hypothesis, we constructed several ensembles of BNs where
there is a perfect match between the structural graph and the effective structure graph.
First consider the ensemble of BNs with the structural graph of the CCN, but with transition functions chosen from the
set of two non-canalizing functions that exist for each variable’s in-degree. This constitutes a Full Effective Connectivity
(FEC) ensemble of BNs whose effective structure perfectly matches the original structural graph of the CCN — there is no
canalization in the dynamics of these networks.
Even though both SC and MDS fail to predict controllability correctly for a sample of 50 networks from the FEC ensemble,
our analysis reveals that they are more easily controlled by smaller driver sets than the original CCN model. Specifically, RD
and AD averaged over all driver variable sets is larger for every FEC sample than for the original CCN model (details in SM).
Many networks in the FEC ensemble were fully controllable by 2 driver variables and all networks could be fully controlled
by 3 driver variables—whereas the original CCN requires 4 variables for full attractor control.
Interestingly, canalization can also be used to improve controllability if selected appropriately. To see how, we compare
BN ensembles with no canalization whatsoever to those with only fully canalizing functions for each motif (see SM for details).
This uncovers the cases where canalization actually improves BN controllability, even beyond the controllability attained by
networks with no canalization. In all such cases, the resulting effective structure reduces the original structural graph to simpler
linear chain motifs (Figure S36 in SM). This way, canalization of the individual variable transition functions is orchestrated
to obtain pathways that channel the collective dynamics towards greater control (macro-level canalization7). Because these
linear chain effective structures match the assumptions of structure-only methods more accurately, their predictions are correct
in such cases. Thus, canalization can enhance the accuracy of structure-only control methodologies if transition functions are
appropriately selected to reduce the effective structure to a linear chain. Naturally, when the size of the network increases
from simple motifs to realistic networks, BNs with such precise effective structure become extremely rare in the ensembles.
Discussion
We studied the interplay between structure and dynamics in the control of complex systems using ensembles of BNs and
existing models of biochemical regulation. The analysis of the BN ensembles constrained by network motifs demonstrates
that structure-only methods fail to properly characterize control; there is a large variation of possible dynamics that can occur
for even the simplest network. The situation only gets worse for structure-only methods when we scale up to real models of
biochemical regulation. Our analysis demonstrates that structural control predictions can both underestimate or overestimate
the number of driver variables in these systems. These approaches also fail to predict which sets of variables best control
dynamics as evaluated by: how much of the total configuration space is accessible (RD ), how much of the configuration space
is accessible beyond the natural system dynamics (CD ), and the ability to transition between attractors (AD ). Often, arguments
made about how easy it is to control network types (e.g. biological vs. social24 ) hinge on how many driver variables are
predicted by structural control theories. Yet, our analysis reveals that much variation in real control occurs for the same
structure and number of driver variables.
Our approach also lays the groundwork for understanding which restrictions must be enforced on the transition functions
of BNs such that structure may suffice for predicting controllability or at least improve the accuracy of structure-only methods
in predicting control. In our experiments with ensembles of network motifs, canalizing transition functions generally rendered
structure-only methods less effective at predicting the control of dynamics. Given the generality of motifs as network building
blocks, this suggests our results will generalize to larger systems, as already observed in the three larger gene-regulation
models considered here. On the other hand, we showed that it is possible to orchestrate canalization such that the effective
structure matches the assumptions of structure-only methods, leading to more accurate predictions about control. This effect
was identifiable in small networks, where it is easy to find the necessary effective structures, however, such structures are rare
in the space of all possible dynamics for larger networks. Nonetheless, in principle, evolution or human design could select
for such networks.
Crucially, without more information about variable dynamics, we certainly cannot assume that a given multi-variate dynamical system meets the assumptions of structure-only methods. For instance, the CCN model uses canalization to make
controllability harder than predicted by structure-only methods, while the SPN model uses canalization to control dynamics to
7/15
the wild-type attractor more easily than suggested by the same methods. All this suggests that canalization plays an important,
nontrivial role in determining structure-dynamic relationships. Further research can explore this interplay in greater detail.
But our current analysis suggests that, without more information about variable dynamics, structure-only methods cannot be
accepted as even an approximation of how control occurs in complex systems.
The control measures we introduced here for BNs provide a complementary viewpoint to those developed to study system
robustness.44, 56 Both concepts are based on the response of the system to perturbations. However, robustness focuses on the
quantity of perturbations to which the system’s dynamics is invariant, whereas control tracks the perturbations which alter
the system’s dynamics. Future research will also explore other characteristics of the controlled state transition graph and
controlled attractor graph so that the relationship between robustness and control can be better studied.
Boolean Networks are ideal, parsimonious systems for our study since they are defined by both a clear interaction structure
and rich nonlinear dynamics using only binary variables. However, our conclusions are not necessarily limited to this type of
network. The control measures used in our study are formulated with respect to a state transition graph, and are therefore applicable to any discrete, deterministic dynamical system. Our conclusions are thus likely to extend to other classes of complex
systems. Indeed, several recent papers have also questioned the validity of structure-only arguments for control of other nonlinear systems.42 These arguments are grounded in the treatment of finite time constants and self-interactions,30 the numerical
limitations of nonlocal controlled trajectories,31 or the role of symmetry in the non-linear dynamics.57 Understanding the
discrepancy between network structure and control is also important for specific applications where methods which construct
a specific controller (i.e. an algorithm that identifies a specific sequence of controlled interventions given a set of constraints)
are desired. Structure-only predictions do not aim to predict controllers, rather they focus on the mere identification of driver
variables. The identification of controllers is the subject of much research in systems biology and complex systems; in this
case, a greater disparity between structure-only predictions and actual control is expected.42
Ultimately, methodologies that can help us predict control in complex networks while avoiding computational complexity
should be developed, but they must combine characteristics of both the structural and dynamical properties of the system.
Promising methods are already being developed which include both structure and dynamics, such as monotone control systems,58 master stability functions,59 schema redescription,7 and stabilization subgraphs.60 Understanding how such simplifications scale-up while providing a reasonable account of how control operates is very important, especially in real-world
systems. This can be accomplished via the type of study we undertook here to analyze the effectiveness of structure-only
methods in predicting the controllability of complex systems.
References
1. Kauffman, S. A. The Origins of Order: self-organization and selection in evolution (Oxford University Press, New York,
1993).
2. Newman, M. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 167–256 (2003).
3. Huang, S. Gene expression profiling, genetic networks, and cellular states: an integrating concept for tumorigenesis and
drug discovery. J. Mol. Med. 77, 469–480 (1999).
4. Barabási, A.-L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5,
101–113 (2004).
5. Zhu, X., Gerstein, M. & Snyder, M. Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. Genes Dev. 21,
1010–1024 (2007).
6. Assmann, S. M. & Albert, R. Discrete dynamic modeling with asynchronous update, or how to model complex systems
in the absence of quantitative information. In Belostotsky, D. A. (ed.) Plant Systems Biology, vol. 553 of Methods in
Molecular Biology, 207–225 (Humana Press, 2009).
7. Marques-Pita, M. & Rocha, L. M. Canalization and control in automata networks: body segmentation in Drosophila
melanogaster. PloS One 8, e55946 (2013).
8. Wang, R.-S. & Albert, R. Elementary signaling modes predict the essentiality of signal transduction network components.
BMC systems biology 5 (2011).
9. Strogatz, S. H. Exploring complex networks. Nature 410, 268–276 (2001).
10. Klemm, K. & Bornholdt, S. Topology of biological networks and reliability of information processing. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 102, 18414–18419 (2005).
11. Shmulevich, I., Kauffman, S. A. & Aldana, M. Eukaryotic cells are dynamically ordered or critical but not chaotic. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13439–13444 (2005).
8/15
12. Nykter, M. et al. Gene expression dynamics in the macrophage exhibit criticality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105,
1897–1900 (2008).
13. Hossein, S., Reichl, M. D. & Bassler, K. E. Symmetry in critical random boolean network dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 89,
042808 (2014).
14. Marques-Pita, M., Manicka, S., Teuscher, C. & Rocha, L. M. Effective Connectivity as an Order Parameter in Random
Boolean Networks Submitted (2018).
15. Shmulevich, I., Lähdesmäki, H., Dougherty, E. R., Astola, J. & Zhang, W. The role of certain Post classes in Boolean
network models of genetic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10734–10739 (2003).
16. Kauffman, S., Peterson, C., Samuelsson, B. & Troein, C. Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always
stable. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17102–17107 (2004).
17. Li, F., Long, T., Lu, Y., Ouyang, Q. & Tang, C. The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 101, 4781–4786 (2004).
18. Gershenson, C., Kauffman, S. A. & Shmulevich, I. The role of redundancy in the robustness of random boolean networks.
In Artificial Life X (MIT Press, 2006).
19. Lin, C. Structural controllability. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19, 201–208 (1974).
20. Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J. & Barabási, A.-L. Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473, 167–173 (2011).
21. Nacher, J. C. & Akutsu, T. Dominating scale-free networks with variable scaling exponent: heterogeneous networks are
not difficult to control. New J. Phys. 14, 073005 (2012).
22. Nacher, J. C. & Akutsu, T. Structural controllability of unidirectional bipartite networks. Scientific Reports 3 (2013).
23. Valente, T. Network Interventions. Science 337, 49–53 (2012).
24. Egerstedt, M. Complex networks: Degrees of control. Nature 473, 158–159 (2011).
25. Ruths, J. & Ruths, D. Control profiles of complex networks. Science 343, 1373–1376 (2014).
26. Delpini, D. et al. Evolution of controllability in interbank networks. Scientific Reports 3 (2013).
27. Österlund, T., Bordel, S. & Nielsen, J. Controllability analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks reveals circular
control patterns among transcription factors. Integrative Biology 7, 560–568 (2015).
28. Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J. & Barabási, A.-L. Observability of complex systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2460–2465
(2013).
29. Müller, F.-J. & Schuppert, A. Few inputs can reprogram biological networks. Nature 478, E4–E5 (2011).
30. Cowan, N. J., Chastain, E. J., Vilhena, D. A., Freudenberg, J. S. & Bergstrom, C. T. Nodal Dynamics, Not Degree
Distributions, Determine the Structural Controllability of Complex Networks. PloS One 7, e38398 (2012).
31. Sun, J. & Motter, A. E. Controllability Transition and Nonlocality in Network Control. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 208701
(2013).
32. Wuchty, S. Controllability in protein interaction networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA U.S.A. 111, 7156–7160 (2014).
33. Wang, B. et al. Diversified control paths: A significant way disease genes perturb the human regulatory network. PLoS
One 10 (2015).
34. Bornholdt, S. Boolean network models of cellular regulation: prospects and limitations. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, S85–S94
(2008).
35. Akutsu, T., Hayashida, M., Ching, W.-K. & Ng, M. K. Control of Boolean networks: hardness results and algorithms for
tree structured networks. J. Theor. Biol. 244, 670–679 (2007).
36. Langmead, C. J. & Jha, S. K. Symbolic approaches for finding control strategies in boolean networks. J. Bioinform.
Comput. Biol. 7, 323–338 (2009).
37. Cheng, D. & Qi, H. Controllability and observability of Boolean control networks. Automatica 45, 1659–1667 (2009).
38. Srihari, S., Raman, V., Leong, H. W. & Ragan, M. A. Evolution and Controllability of Cancer Networks: A Boolean
Perspective. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. 11, 83–94 (2013).
39. Jia, T. & Barabási, A.-L. Control Capacity and A Random Sampling Method in Exploring Controllability of Complex
Networks. Scientific Reports 3 (2013).
9/15
40. Li, R., Yang, M. & Chu, T. Controllability and observability of boolean networks arising from biology. Chaos 25, 023104
(2015).
41. Lu, W., Tamura, T., Song, J. & Akutsu, T. Computing smallest intervention strategies for multiple metabolic networks in
a boolean model. J. Comp. Biol. 22, 85–110 (2015).
42. Motter, A. E. Networkcontrology. Chaos 25, 097621 (2015).
43. Wuensche, A. Discrete dynamical networks and their attractor basins. In Standish, R. et al. (eds.) Complex Systems’98
(University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 1998).
44. Willadsen, K. & Wiles, J. Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models. J. Theor. Biol. 249,
749–765 (2007).
45. Sontag, E. D. Mathematical control theory: deterministic finite dimensional systems. Springer, New York (1998).
46. Kauffman, S. A. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J. Theor. Biol. 22, 437–467
(1969).
47. Zhang, R. et al. Network model of survival signaling in large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105, 16308–16313 (2008).
48. Kauffman, S. A., Peterson, C., Samuelsson, B. & Troein, C. Random Boolean network models and the yeast transcriptional network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14796–14799 (2003).
49. Ciliberti, S., Martin, O. C. & Wagner, A. Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13591–13596 (2007).
50. Reichhardt, C. J. O. & Bassler, K. Canalization and symmetry in boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. Physica
A 40, 4339–4350 (2007).
51. Shen-Orr, S. S., Milo, R., Mangan, S. & Alon, U. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia
coli. Nature Genetics 31, 64–68 (2002).
52. Ingram, P. J., Stumpf, M. P. & Stark, J. Network motifs: structure does not determine function. BMC Genomics 7, 108
(2006).
53. Prill, R. J., Iglesias, P. A. & Levchenko, A. Dynamic Properties of Network Motifs Contribute to Biological Network
Organization. PLoS Biology 3, e343 (2005).
54. Mangan, S. & Alon, U. Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100,
11980–11985 (2003).
55. Albert, R. & Othmer, H. G. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment
polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Theor. Biol. 223, 1–18 (2003).
56. Chaves, M., Sontag, E. D. & Albert, R. Methods of robustness analysis for boolean models of gene control networks. IEE
P. SYST. BIOL. 153, 154–167 (2006).
57. Whalen, A. J., Brennan, S. N., Sauer, T. D. & Schiff, S. J. Observability and controllability of nonlinear networks: The
role of symmetry. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011005 (2015).
58. Angeli, D. & Sontag, E. D. Monotone control systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 48, 1684–1698 (2003).
59. Gutiérrez, R., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Zanin, M., Papo, D. & Boccaletti, S. Targeting the dynamics of complex networks.
Scientific Reports 2 (2012).
60. Zañudo, J. G. & Albert, R. Cell fate reprogramming by control of intracellular network dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol.
11, e1004193 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We thank Randall Beer, Artemy Kolchinsky, Santosh Manicka, Eran Agmon, Ian Wood, and three anonymous reviewers for
helpful conversations and feedback. This work was partially supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health,
National Library of Medicine Program, grant 01LM011945-01 ”BLR: Evidence-based Drug-Interaction Discovery: In-Vivo,
In-Vitro and Clinical,” a fellowship from the NSF IGERT ”The Dynamics of Brain-Body-Enivronment Systems in Behavior
and Cognition”, a grant from the Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (Portugal), PTDC/EIA-CCO/114108/2009 ?Collective Computation and Control in Complex Biochemical Systems?, as well as a grant from the joint program between the
Fundacao Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento (Portugal) and the National Science Foundation (USA), 2012-2014, ”Network Mining For Gene Regulation And Biochemical Signaling.” The funders had no role in study design, data collection and
analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The source code is available upon request.
10/15
Author contributions statement
A.G. and L.R. designed the study, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript.
Additional information
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
11/15
A
STG
0.5
0.0
1.0
D = { xi }
0.5
0.0
1.0
D = { xi , xj }
Mean Fraction of Reachable Conf gurations (R D )
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0 0.0
0.5
1.0 0.0
0.5
Mean Fraction of Controlled Conf gurations (C D )
1
2
5
6
3
1.0
4
8
Figure 4. Control portrait of the BN ensemble constrained by the Loop network motif with self-interactions. A) The mean
fraction of reachable configurations RD and the mean fraction of controllable configurations CD for the full ensemble of 4096
BNs with structure given by the Loop network motif with self-interactions shown in Figure 1D, as controlled by the driver
variable sets D ≡ 0/ (STG), D ≡ {xi }, and D ≡ {xi , x j } (due to the symmetry of the network, all sets of size one are equivalent,
likewise those of size two). The full effective structure (FES) subset is shown by red circles, the reduced effective structure
(RES) subset is shown in blue squares, and the non-contingent (NC) subset is shown by green diamonds; the area of the
object corresponds to the number of networks at that point. B) (left) The number of attractors for each network in the full
ensemble spans from 1 − 8, the area of each pie chart scales logarithmically with the number of attractors, from 1868 to 1;
the colored slices delineate the subset decompositions for NC, RES, and FES. (middle and right) Box plots for the
distribution of the mean fraction of reachable attractors AD for D ≡ {xi }, {xi , x j } for the full ensemble (purple), NC, RES,
and FES subsets. In each case, the box shows the interquartile range, the median is given by the solid vertical line, the mean
is given by the black circle, and the whiskers show the support of the distribution.
13/15
1.0
0.75
0.5
0.25
0.0
0.06
0.0
SLP
wg
WG
en
EN
hh
HH
ptc
PTC
PH
SMO
ci
CI
CIA
CIR
nhh/nHH
nwg/nWG
Mean Fraction of Reachable Attractors (A D )
0.12
|D | = 1
|D | = 2
1.0
0.75
0.5
0.25
0.0
0.0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12
Mean Fraction of Reachable Conf gurations (R D )
Figure 5. Control of the single-cell segment polarity network (SPN) of gene and protein regulation in Drosophila
melanogaster for all driver variable subsets of size |D| = 1, |D| = 2, |D| = 3, and |D| = 4. (inset) The mean fraction of
reachable attractors AD for each singleton driver variable set. The driver subsets predicted by structural controllability (SC)
to fully control the network are highlighted in red and labeled S 1, S 2, S 3, S 4. The three variable driver subset with full
attractor control is highlighted in yellow and labeled S 0 (see SM for further details).
14/15
Mean Fraction of Reachable Attractors (A D )
A
1.0
0.75
0.5
0.25
|D | = 2
0.0
1.0
0.75
0.5
0.25
|D | = 3
0.0
0.0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 0.0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0
Mean Fraction of Reachable Conf gurations (R D )
B
CellSize
Cln3
SBF
MBF
Cln1,2
Sic1
Clb5,6
Cdh1
Clb1,2
Mcm1/SFF
Cdc20/14
Swi5
Figure 6. A) Control of the eukaryotic cell cycle of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CCN) for all driver variable
subsets of size |D| = 1, |D| = 2, |D| = 3, and |D| = 4. (inset) The mean fraction of reachable attractors AD for each singleton
driver variable set. The subset predicted to fully control the network are highlighted in red and labeled Y 0 for structural
controllability (SC), while those predicted by minimum dominating sets (MDS) are labeled Y 1 − 8. The driver variable
subsets with full attractor control are highlighted in yellow (see SM for further details). B) Controlled Attractor Graphs
(CAGs) for each singleton driver variable set. The wild-type attractor is highlighted in green, all other attractors are in purple.
15/15
| 3cs.SY
|
arXiv:1611.06569v1 [math.GR] 20 Nov 2016
On finite P σT -groups
Alexander N. Skiba
Department of Mathematics, Francisk Skorina Gomel State University,
Gomel 246019, Belarus
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Let σ = {σi |i ∈ I} be some partition of the set of all primes P and G a finite group. G is said
to be σ-soluble if every chief factor H/K of G is a σi -group for some i = i(H/K).
A set H of subgroups of G is said to be a complete Hall σ-set of G if every member 6= 1 of H is
a Hall σi -subgroup of G for some σi ∈ σ and H contains exact one Hall σi -subgroup of G for every
i ∈ I such that σi ∩ π(G) 6= ∅. A subgroup A of G is said to be σ-permutable or σ-quasinormal
in G if G has a complete Hall σ-set H such that AH x = H x A for all x ∈ G and all H ∈ H.
We obtain a characterization of finite σ-soluble groups G in which σ-quasinormality is a
transitive relation in G.
1
Introduction
Throughout this paper, all groups are finite and G always denotes a finite group. Moreover, P is the
set of all primes, π ⊆ P and π ′ = P \ π. If n is an integer, the symbol π(n) denotes the set of all
primes dividing n; as usual, π(G) = π(|G|), the set of all primes dividing the order of G. G is said to
be a Dπ -group if G possesses a Hall π-subgroup E and every π-subgroup of G is contained in some
conjugate of E.
In what follows, σ is some partition of P, that is, σ = {σi |i ∈ I}, where P = ∪i∈I σi and σi ∩σj = ∅
for all i 6= j; Π is always supposed to be a subset of the set σ and Π′ = σ \ Π.
By the analogy with the notation π(n), we write σ(n) to denote the set {σi |σi ∩ π(n) 6= ∅};
σ(G) = σ(|G|). G is said to be: σ-primary [1] if |σ(G)| ≤ 1; σ-decomposable (Shemetkov [2]) or
σ-nilpotent (Guo and Skiba [3]) if G = G1 ×· · ·×Gn for some σ-primary groups G1 , . . . , Gn ; σ-soluble
[1] if every chief factor of G is σ-primary; a σ-full group of Sylow type [1] if every subgroup E of G
is a Dσi -group for every σi ∈ σ(E).
A natural number n is said to be a Π-number if σ(n) ⊆ Π. A subgroup A of G is said to be: a
Hall Π-subgroup of G [1, 4] if |A| is a Π-number and |G : A| is a Π′ -number; a σ-Hall subgroup of G
if A is a Hall Π-subgroup of G for some Π ⊆ σ.
0
0
Keywords: finite group, σ-quasinormal subgroup, P σT -group, σ-soluble group, σ-nilpotent group.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 20D10, 20D15, 20D30
1
A set H of subgroups of G is a complete Hall σ-set of G [4, 5] if every member 6= 1 of H is a
Hall σi -subgroup of G for some σi ∈ σ and H contains exact one Hall σi -subgroup of G for every
σi ∈ σ(G).
Recall that a subgroup A of G is said to be: σ-permutable or σ-quasinormal in G [1] if G possesses
a complete Hall σ-set H such that AH x = H x A for all H ∈ H and all x ∈ G; σ-subnormal in G [1]
if there is a subgroup chain
A = A0 ≤ A1 ≤ · · · ≤ At = G
such that either Ai−1 E Ai or Ai /(Ai−1 )Ai is σ-primary for all i = 1, . . . , t.
In the classical case, when σ = σ 0 = {{2}, {3}, . . .}, σ-quasinormal subgroups are also called
S-quasinormal or S-permutable [6, 7], and a subgroup A of G is subnormal in G if and only if it is
σ 0 -subnormal in G.
We say that G is a P σT -group [1] if σ-quasinormality is a transitive relation in G, that is, if K is
a σ-quasinormal subgroup of H and H is a σ-quasinormal subgroup of G, then K is a σ-quasinormal
subgroup of G. In the case, when σ = {{2}, {3}, . . .}, P σT -groups are called P ST -groups [6].
In view of Theorem B in [1], P σT -groups can be characterized as the groups in which every
σ-subnormal subgroup is σ-quasinormal in G.
Our first observation is the following fact, which generalizes the sufficiency condition in Theorem
A of the paper [1].
Theorem A. Let G have a normal σ-Hall subgroup D such that:
(i) G/D is a P σT -group, and
(ii) every σ-subnormal subgroup of D is normal in G.
If G is a σ-full group of Sylow type, then G is a P σT -group.
Corollary 1.1 (See Theorem A in [1]). Let G have a normal σ-Hall subgroup D such that:
(i) G/D is σ-nilpotent, and
(ii) every subgroup of D is normal in G.
Then G is a P σT -group.
In the case when σ = {{2}, {3}, . . .}, we get from Theorem A the following
Corollary 1.2 (See Theorem 2.4 in [8]). Let G have a normal Hall subgroup D such that:
(i) G/D is a P ST -group, and
(ii) every subnormal subgroup of D is normal in G.
Then G is a P ST -group.
Recall that GNσ denotes the σ-nilpotent residual of G, that is, the intersection of all normal
subgroups N of G with σ-nilpotent quotient G/N ; GN denotes the nilpotent residual of G [9].
2
Definition 1.3. We say that G is a special P σT -group provided the σ-nilpotent residual D = GNσ
of G is contained in a Hall σi -subgroup E of G for some i and the following conditions hold:
(i) D is a Hall subgroup of G and every element of G induces a power automorphism in D;
(ii) D has a normal complement S in E.
Note that if G = C5 × (C3 ⋊ C2 ), where C3 ⋊ C2 ≃ S3 and σ = {{3, 5}, {3, 5}′ }, then G is a
special P σT -group with C3 = GNσ .
The following theorem shows that every special P σT -group is a P σT -group.
Theorem B. Suppose that G has a σ-nilpotent normal Hall subgroup D with σ-nilpotent quotient
G/D such that G/O σi (D) is a special P σT -group for each σi ∈ σ(D). Then G is a P σT -group.
Generalizing the concept of complete Wielandt σ-set of a group in [3], we say that a complete Hall
σ-set H of G is a generalized Wielandt σ-set of G if every member H of H is π(GNσ )-supersoluble.
Using Theorem B, we prove also the following revised version of Theorem A in [1].
Theorem C. Let G be σ-soluble and D = GNσ . Suppose that G has a generalized Wielandt
σ-set. Then G is a P σT -group if and only if the following conditions hold:
(i) D is an abelian Hall subgroup of G of odd order and every element of G induces a power
automorphism in D;
(ii) G/O σi (D) is a special P σT -group for each σi ∈ σ(D).
Corollary 1.4 (See Theorem 2.3 in [8]). Let G be a soluble and D = GN . If G is a P ST -group,
then D is an abelian Hall subgroup of G of odd order and every element of G induces a power
automorphism in D.
2
Some preliminary results
In view of Theorems A and B in [4], the following fact is true.
Lemma 2.1. If G is σ-soluble, then G is a σ-full group of Sylow type.
We use Nσ to denote the class of all σ-nilpotent groups.
Lemma 2.2 (See Corollary 2.4 and Lemma 2.5 in [1]). The class Nσ is closed under taking
products of normal subgroups, homomorphic images and subgroups. Moreover, if E is a normal
subgroup of G and E/E ∩ Φ(G) is σ-nilpotent, then E is σ-nilpotent.
In view of Proposition 2.2.8 in [9], we get from Lemma 2.2 the following
Lemma 2.3. If N is a normal subgroup of G, then
(G/N )Nσ = GNσ N/N.
3
Lemma 2.4 (See Knyagina and Monakhov [10]). Let H, K and N be pairwise permutable
subgroups of G and H be a Hall subgroup of G. Then
N ∩ HK = (N ∩ H)(N ∩ K).
Lemma 2.5. The following statements hold:
(i) G is a P σT -group if and only if every σ-subnormal subgroup of G is σ-quasinormal in G.
(ii) If G is a P σT -group, then every quotient G/N of G is also a P σT -group.
(iii) If G is a special P σT -group, then every quotient G/N of G is also a special P σT -group.
Proof. (i) This follows from the fact (see Theorem B in [1]) that every σ-quasinormal subgroup
of G is σ-subnormal in G.
(ii) Let H/N be a σ-subnormal subgroup of G/N . Then H is a σ-subnormal subgroup of G
by Lemma 2.6(5) in [1], so H is σ-quasinormal in G by hypothesis and Part (i). Hence H/N is
σ-quasinormal in G/N by Lemma 2.8(2) in [1]. Hence G/N is a P σT -group by Part (i).
(iii) Suppose that D = GNσ is a Hall subgroup of G and D ≤ E, where E = D × S is a Hall
σi -subgroup E of G, and every element of G induces a power automorphism in D. Then EN/N
is a Hall σi -subgroup of G/N and DN/N = (G/N )Nσ is a Hall subgroup of G/N by Lemma 2.3.
Moreover, EN/N = (DN/N )(SN/N ) and, by Lemma 2.4,
DN ∩ SN = N (D ∩ SN ) = N (D ∩ S)(D ∩ N ) = N (D ∩ N ) = N,
which implies that (DN/N ) ∩ (SN/N ) = 1. Hence EN/N = (DN/N ) × (SN/N ).
Finally, let H/N ≤ DN/N . Then H = N (H ∩D), where H ∩D is normal in G by hypothesis. But
then H/N = N (H ∩D)/N is normal in G/N , so every element of G/N induces a power automorphism
on DN/D. Hence G/N is a special P σT -group.
The lemma is proved.
3
Proofs of the results
Proof of Theorem A. Since G is a σ-full group of Sylow type by hypothesis, it possesses a
complete Hall σ-set H = {H1 , . . . , Ht }, and a subgroup H of G is σ-quasinormal in G if and only
if HHix = Hix H for all Hi ∈ H and x ∈ G. We can assume without loss of generality that Hi is a
σi -group for all i = 1, . . . , t.
Assume that this theorem is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then D 6= 1
and for some σ-subnormal subgroup H of G and for some x ∈ G and k ∈ I we have HHkx 6= Hkx H
by Lemma 2.5(i). Let E = Hkx .
4
(1) The hypothesis holds for every quotient G/N of G.
It is clear that G/N is a σ-full group of Sylow type and DN/N is a normal σ-Hall subgroup of
G/N . On the other hand,
(G/N )/(DN/N ) ≃ G/DN ≃ (G/D)/(DN/D),
so (G/N )/(DN/N ) is a P σT -group by Lemma 2.5(ii). Finally, let H/N be a σ-subnormal subgroup
of DN/N . Then H = N (H ∩ D) and, by Lemma 2.6(5) in [1], H is σ-subnormal in G. Hence
H ∩ D is σ-subnormal in D by Lemma 2.6(1) in [1], so H ∩ D is normal in G by hypothesis. Thus
H/N = N (H ∩ D)/N is normal in G/N . Therefore the hypothesis holds on G/N .
(2) HG = 1.
Assume that HG 6= 1. Clearly, H/HG is σ-subnormal in G/HG . Claim (1) implies that the
hypothesis holds for G/HG , so the choice of G implies that G/HG is a P σT -group. Hence
(H/HG )(EHG /HG ) = (EHG /HG )(H/HG ).
by Lemma 2.5(i). Therefore EH = EHHG is a subgroup of G and so HE = EH, a contradiction.
Hence HG = 1.
(3) DH = D × H.
By Lemma 2.6(1) in [1], H ∩ D is σ-subnormal in D. Hence H ∩ D is normal in G by hypothesis,
which implies that H ∩ D = 1 by Claim (2). Lemma 2.6(1) in [1] implies also that H is σ-subnormal
in DH. But H is a σ-Hall subgroup of DH since D is a σ-Hall subgroup of G and H ∩ D = 1.
Therefore H is normal in DH by Lemma 2.6(10) in [1], so DH = D × H.
Final contradiction. Since D is a σ-Hall subgroup of G, then either E ≤ D or E ∩ D = 1. But the
former case is impossible by Claim (3) since HE 6= EH, so E ∩ D = 1. Therefore E is a Π′ -subgroup
of G, where Π = σ(D). By the Schur-Zassenhaus theorem, D has a complement M in G. Then M
is a Hall Π′ -subgroup of G and so for some x ∈ G we have E ≤ M x since G is a σ-full group of
Sylow type. On the other hand, H ∩ M x is a Hall Π′ -subgroup of H by Lemma 2.6(7) in [1] and
hence H ∩ M x = H ≤ M x since H ∩ D = 1 by Claim (3). Lemma 2.6(1) in [1] implies that H is
σ-subnormal in M x . But M x ≃ G/D is a P σT -group by hypothesis, so HE = EH by Lemma 2.5(i).
This contradiction completes the proof of the theorem.
Lemma 3.1. If G is a special P σT -group, then it is a P σT -group.
Proof. Let D = GNσ and E be a normal Hall σi -subgroup of G such that E = D × S. Since G/D
is σ-nilpotent, G is σ-soluble. Hence G is a σ-full group of Sylow type by Lemma 2.1. Therefore G
possesses a complete Hall σ-set H = {H1 , . . . , Ht }, and a subgroup H of G is σ-quasinormal in G if
and only if HHjx = Hjx H for all Hj ∈ H and x ∈ G. We can assume without loss of generality that
Hj is a σj -group for all j = 1, . . . , t.
Assume that this lemma is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then G is
not σ-nilpotent, and for some σ-subnormal subgroup H of G and for some x ∈ G and k ∈ I we
5
have HHkx 6= Hkx H by Lemma 2.5(i). Let E = Hkx . The subgroup S is normal in G since it is
characteristic in E. Since G is not σ-nilpotent, D 6= 1. On the other hand, Theorem A and the
choice of G imply that S 6= 1 since every subgroup of D is normal in G by hypothesis. Let R and
N be minimal normal subgroups of G such that R ≤ D and N ≤ S. Then R is a group of order
p for some prime p. Hence R ∩ HN ≤ Op (HN ) ≤ P , where P is a Sylow p-subgroup of H since
π(D) ∩ π(S) = ∅, so R ∩ HN = R ∩ H.
The hypothesis holds for G/R and G/N by Lemma 2.5(iii). Hence the choice of G and Lemma
2.5(i) imply that
EHR/R = (ER/R)(HR/R) = (HR/R)(EHR/R)
and so EHR is a subgroup of G. Similarly we get that EHN is a subgroup of G. Since |R| = p and
EH is not a subgroup of G, R ∩ E = 1. Therefore from Lemma 2.4 we get that that R ∩ EHN =
R ∩ E(HN ) = (R ∩ E)(R ∩ HN ) = R ∩ HN . Hence
EHR ∩ EHN = E(HR ∩ EHN ) = EH(R ∩ EHN ) = EH(R ∩ HN ) =
= EH(R ∩ HN ) = EH(R ∩ H) = EH
is a subgroup of G. Hence HE = EH, a contradiction. The lemma is proved.
Lemma 3.2. If H = {H1 , . . . , Ht } is a generalized Wielandt σ-set of G, then
H0 = {H1 N/N, . . . , Ht N/N }
is a generalized Wielandt σ-set of G/N .
Proof. It is clear that H0 is a complete Hall σ-set of G/N . Now let D = GNσ and π = π(GNσ ).
Then (G/N )Nσ = DN/N by Lemma 2.3, so
π0 = π((G/N )Nσ ) = π(DN/N ) ⊆ π(D) = π.
Hence every member Hi of H is π0 -supersoluble, so Hi N/N is π0 -supersoluble. Hence H0 is a
generalized Wielandt σ-set of G/N . The lemma is proved.
Proof of Theorem B. Clearly, G is σ-soluble, so G is a σ-full group of Sylow type by Lemma
2.1. Therefore G possesses a complete Hall σ-set H = {H1 , . . . , Ht }, and a subgroup H of G is
σ-quasinormal in G if and only if HHix = Hix H for all Hi ∈ H and x ∈ G. We can assume without
loss of generality that Hi is a σi -group for all i = 1, . . . , t.
Assume that this theorem is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then D 6= 1
and for some σ-subnormal subgroup H of G and for some x ∈ G and k ∈ I we have HHkx 6= Hkx H
by Lemma 2.5(i). Let E = Hkx .
(1) G is not a special P σT -group (This follows from Lemma 3.1 and the choice of G).
(2) |σ(D)| > 1.
6
Indeed, suppose that σ(D) = {σi }. Then O σi (D) = 1, so G ≃ G/O σi (D) is a special P σT -group
by hypothesis, contrary to Claim (1).
(3) The hypothesis holds for every quotient G/N of G, where N ≤ D.
First we show that (G/N )/Oσi (DN/N ) is a special P σT -group for each σi ∈ σ(DN/N ). Note
that σi ∈ σ(DN/N ) = σ(D/(D ∩ N )) ⊆ σ(D), so G/Oσi (D) is a special P σT -group by hypothesis.
It is not difficult to show that
Oσi (D)N/N = O σi (D/N ).
Hence
(G/N )/(Oσi (D/N )) = (G/N )/(Oσi (D)N/N ) ≃ G/N Oσi (D) ≃
≃ (G/Oσi (D))/(Oσi (D)N/Oσi (D))
is a special P σT -group by Lemma 2.5(iii).
It is clear also that DN/N ≃ D/D ∩ N is a σ-nilpotent normal Hall subgroup of G/N with
σ-nilpotent quotient
(G/N )/(DN/N ) ≃ G/DN ≃ (G/D)/(DN/D)
by Lemma 2.2. Hence we have (3).
(4) If N is a minimal normal subgroup of G contained in D, then EHN is a subgroup of G.
Claim (3) and the choice of G implies that the conclusion of the theorem holds for G/N . On
the other hand, EN/E is a Hall σk -subgroup of G/N and, by Lemma 2.6(4) in [1], HN/N is a
σ-subnormal subgroup of G. Note also that G/N is σ-soluble, so every two Hall σk -subgroups of
G/N are conjugate by Lemma 2.1. Thus,
(HN/N )(EN/N ) = (EN/N )(HN/N ) = EHN/N
by Lemma 2.5(i). Hence EHN is a subgroup of G.
Final contradiction. Since |σ(D)| > 1 by Claim (2) and D is σ-nilpotent, G has at least two σprimary minimal normal subgroups R and N such that R, N ≤ D and σ(R) 6= σ(N ). Then at least
one of the subgroups R or N , R say, is a σi -group for some i 6= k. Then R ∩ HN ≤ Oσi (HN ) ≤ V ,
where V is a Hall σi -subgroup of H, since N is a σi′ -group and G is a σ-full group of Sylow type.
Hence R ∩ HN = R ∩ H. Claim (4) implies that EHR and EHN are subgroups of G. Now, arguing
similarly as in the proof of Lemma 3.1, one can show that EHR ∩ EHN = EH is a subgroup of G,
so HE = EH. This contradiction completes the proof of the result.
Proof of Theorem C. Let π = π(D) and H = {H1 , . . . , Ht } be a generalized Wielandt σ-set
of G. We can assume without loss of generality that Hi is a σi -group for all i = 1, . . . , t. Since G is
σ-soluble by hypothesis, G is a σ-full group of Sylow type by Lemma 2.1.
Necessity. Assume that this is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then
D 6= 1.
7
(1) If R is a non-identity normal subgroup of G, then the hypothesis holds for G/R. Hence the
necessity condition of the theorem holds for G/R (Since the hypothesis holds for G/R by Lemmas
2.5(ii) and 3.2, this follows from the choice of G).
(2) If E is a proper σ-subnormal subgroup of G, then E Nσ ≤ D and the necessity condition of
the theorem holds for E.
Every σ-subnormal subgroup H of E is σ-subnormal in G by Lemma 2.6(2) in [1] and hence H
is σ-quasinormal in G by hypothesis and Lemma 2.5(i). Thus H is σ-quasinormal in E by Lemma
2.8(1) in [1] since G is a σ-full group of Sylow type. Thus, E is a σ-soluble P σT -group. It is clear
that E possesses a complete Hall σ-set H0 = {E1 , . . . , En } such that Ei ≤ Hixi for some xi ∈ G for
all i = 1, . . . , n. Hence every member of H0 is π-supersoluble. Moreover, since
E/E ∩ D ≃ ED/D ∈ Nσ
and Nσ is a hereditary class by Lemma 2.2, we have E/E ∩ D ∈ Nσ . Hence E Nσ ≤ E ∩ D. Therefore,
π0 = π(E Nσ ) ⊆ π. Hence every member of H0 is π0 -supersoluble. Hence H0 is a generalized Wielandt
σ-set of E.
Therefore the hypothesis holds for E, so the necessity condition of the theorem holds for E by
the choice of G.
(3) D is nilpotent.
Assume that this is false and let R be a minimal normal subgroup of G. Then RD/R = (G/R)Nσ
is abelian by Lemma 2.3 and Claim (1). Therefore R ≤ D, R is the unique minimal normal subgroup
of G and R Φ(G) by Lemma 2.2. Let V be a maximal subgroup of R. Since G is σ-soluble by
hypothesis, R is a σi -group for some i. Hence V is σ-subnormal in G by Lemma 2.6(6) in [1], so V is
σ-quasinormal in G by hypothesis and Lemma 2.5(i). Then R ≤ D ≤ Oσi (G) ≤ NG (V ) by Lemma
3.1 in [1]. Hence R is abelian, so R = CG (R) is a p-group for some prime p by [11, A, 15.2].
It is clear that R ≤ Hi ∩D for some i. Then Hi is p-supersoluble by hypothesis, so some subgroup
L of R of order p is normal in Hi . On the other hand, L is clearly σ-quasinormal in G and hence
G = Hi O σi (G) ≤ NG (L) by Lemma 3.1 in [1], so R = L. Therefore G/CG (R) = G/R is a cyclic
group. Hence G is supersoluble and therefore D is nilpotent.
(4) D is a Hall subgroup of G.
Suppose that this is false and let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of D such that 1 < P < Gp , where
Gp ∈ Sylp (G). We can assume without loss of generality that Gp ≤ H1 .
(a) D = P is a minimal normal subgroup of G.
Let R be a minimal normal subgroup of G contained in D. Since D is nilpotent by Claim (3), R
is a q-group for some prime q. Moreover, D/R = (G/R)Nσ is a Hall subgroup of G/R by Claim (1)
and Lemma 2.3. Suppose that P R/R 6= 1. Then P R/R ∈ Sylp (G/R). If q 6= p, then P ∈ Sylp (G).
This contradicts the fact that P < Gp . Hence q = p, so R ≤ P and therefore P/R ∈ Sylp (G/R) and
8
we again get that P ∈ Sylp (G). This contradiction shows that P R/R = 1, which implies that R = P
is the unique minimal normal subgroup of G contained in D. Since D is nilpotent, a p′ -complement
E of D is characteristic in D and so it is normal in G. Hence E = 1, which implies that R = D = P .
(b) D Φ(G). Hence for some maximal subgroup M of G we have G = D ⋊ M (This follows
from Lemma 2.2 since G is not σ-nilpotent).
(c) If G has a minimal normal subgroup L 6= D, then Gp = D × (L ∩ Gp ). Hence Op′ (G) = 1.
Indeed, DL/L ≃ D is a Hall subgroup of G/L by Claim (1). Hence Gp L/L = RL/L, so
Gp = D × (L ∩ Gp ). Thus Op′ (G) = 1 since D < Gp by Claim (a).
(d) V = CG (D) ∩ M is a normal subgroup of G and CG (D) = D × V ≤ H1 .
In view of Claim (b), CG (D) = D × V , where V = CG (D) ∩ M is a normal subgroup of G. By
Claim (a), V ∩D = 1 and hence V ≃ DV /D is σ-nilpotent by Lemma 2.2. Let W be a σ1 -complement
of V . Then W is characteristic in V and so it is normal in G. Therefore we have (d) by Claim (c).
(e) Gp 6= H1 .
Assume that Gp = H1 . Let Z be a subgroup of order p in Z(Gp ) ∩ D. Then, since D ≤ Oσ1 (G) =
Op (G), Z is normal in G by Lemma 3.1 in [1]. Hence D = Z < Gp and so D < CG (D). Then
V = CG (D) ∩ M 6= 1 is a normal subgroup of G and V ≤ H1 = Gp by Claim (d). Let L be a minimal
normal subgroup of G contained in V . Then Gp = D × L is a normal elementary abelian subgroup
of G. Therefore every subgroup of Gp is normal in G by Lemma 3.1 in [1]. Hence |D| = |L| = p. Let
D = hai, L = hbi and N = habi. Then N D, so in view of the G-isomorphisms
DN/D ≃ N ≃ N L/L = Gp /L = DL/L ≃ D
we get that G/CG (D) = G/CG (N ) is a p-group since G/D is σ-nilpotent by Lemma 2.2. But then
Claim (d) implies that G is a p-group. This contradiction shows that we have (e).
Final contradiction for (4). In view of Theorem A in [4], G has a σ1 -complement E such that
EGp = Gp E. Let V = (EGp )Nσ . By Claim (e), EGp 6= G. On the other hand, since D ≤ EGp by
Claim (a), EGp is σ-subnormal in G by Lemma 2.6(5) in [1]. Therefore the necessity condition of
the theorem holds for EGp by Claim (2). Hence V is a Hall subgroup of EGp . Moreover, by Claim
(2) we have V ≤ D, so for a Sylow p-subgroup Vp of V we have |Vp | ≤ |P | < |Gp |. Hence V is a
p′ -group and so V ≤ CG (D) ≤ H1 = Gp . Thus V = 1. Therefore EGp = E × Gp is σ-nilpotent and
so E ≤ CG (D) ≤ H1 by Claim (d). Hence E = 1 and so D = 1, a contradiction. Thus, D is a Hall
subgroup of G.
(5) G/O σi (D) is a special P σT -group for each σi ∈ σ(D).
First assume that O σi (D) 6= 1 and let N be a minimal normal subgroup of G contained in Oσi (D).
Then G/N is a P σT -group by Lemma 2.5(ii), so the choice of G implies that
(G/N )/Oσi (D/N ) = (G/N )/(Oσi (D)/N ) ≃ G/Oσi (D)
9
is a special P σT -group. Now assume that O σi (D) = 1, that is, D is a σi -group. Since G/D is
σ-nilpotent by Lemma 2.2, Hi /D is normal in G/D and hence Hi is normal in G. Therefore all
subgroups of D are σ-permutable in G by Lemma 2.3(2)(3) and hypothesis. Since D is a normal
Hall subgroup of Hi , it has a complement S in Hi by the Schur-Zassenhaus theorem. Lemma 3.1 in
[1] implies that D ≤ O σi (G) ≤ NG (S). Hence Hi = D × S. Therefore
G = Hi Oσi (G) = SO σi (G) ≤ NG (L)
for every subgroup L of D. Hence every element of G induces a power automorphism in D. Hence
G is a special P σT -group.
(6) Every subgroup H of D is normal in G. Hence every element of G induces a power automorphism in D.
Since D is nilpotent by Claim (3), it is enough to consider the case when H is a subgroup of the
Sylow p-subgroup P of D for some prime p. For some i we have P ≤ Oσi (D) = Hi ∩ D. On the
other hand, we have
D = Oσi (D) × Oσi (D)
since D is nilpotent. Then
HOσi (D)/Oσi (D) ≤ D/Oσi (D) = (G/O σi (D))Nσ ,
so HOσi (D)/Oσi (D) is normal in G/Oσi (D) by Claim (5). Hence HOσi (D) is normal in G, which
implies that
H = H(Oσi (D) ∩ Oσi (D)) = HOσi (D) ∩ Oσi (D)
is normal in G.
(7) If p is a prime such that (p − 1, |G|) = 1, then p does not divide |D|. In particular, |D| is
odd.
Assume that this is false. Then, by Claim (6), D has a maximal subgroup E such that |D : E| = p
and E is normal in G. It follows that CG (D/E) = G since (p−1, |G|) = 1. Since D is a Hall subgroup
of G, it has a complement M in G. Hence G/E = (D/E) × (M E/E), where M E/E ≃ M ≃ G/D is
σ-nilpotent. Therefore G/E is σ-nilpotent by Lemma 2.2. But then D ≤ E, a contradiction. Hence
p does not divide |D|. In particular, |D| is odd.
(8) D is abelian.
In view of Claim (6), D is a Dedekind group. Hence D is abelian since |D| is odd by Claim (7).
From Claims (4)–(8) we get that the necessity condition of the theorem holds for G.
Sufficiency. This directly follows from Theorem B.
The theorem is proved.
10
References
[1] A.N. Skiba, On σ-subnormal and σ-permutable subgroups of finite groups, J. Algebra, 436
(2015), 1–16.
[2] L.A. Shemetkov, Formations of finite groups, Nauka, Main Editorial Board for Physical and
Mathematical Literature, Moscow, 1978.
[3] W. Guo, A.N. Skiba, Finite groups with permutable complete Wielandt sets of subgroups, J.
Group Theory, 18 (2015), 191–200.
[4] A.N. Skiba, A generalization of a Hall theorem, J. Algebra and its Application, 15(5) (2016),
DOI: 10.1142/S0219498816500857.
[5] A.N. Skiba, On some results in the theory of finite partially soluble groups, Commun. Math.
Stat., 4(3) (2016), 281–309.
[6] A. Ballester-Bolinches, R. Esteban-Romero, M. Asaad, Products of Finite Groups, Walter de
Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 2010.
[7] W. Guo, Structure Theory for Canonical Classes of Finite Groups, Springer, Heidelberg-New
York-Dordrecht-London, 2015.
[8] R.K. Agrawal, Finite groups whose subnormal subgroups permute with all Sylow subgroups,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 47 (1975), 77–83.
[9] A. Ballester-Bolinches, L.M. Ezquerro, Classes of Finite groups, Springer, Dordrecht, 2006.
[10] B.N. Knyagina, V.S. Monakhov, On π ′ -properties of finite groups having a Hall π-subgroup,
Siberian Math. J., 522 (2011), 398–309.
[11] K. Doerk, T. Hawkes, Finite Soluble Groups, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1992.
11
| 4math.GR
|
Inference for Multiple Change-points in Linear and Non-linear
arXiv:1703.00647v1 [math.ST] 2 Mar 2017
Time Series Models
Wai Leong Ng∗
Shenyi Pan†
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
The University of British Columbia
Chun Yip Yau‡
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
March 3, 2017
Abstract
In this paper we develop a generalized likelihood ratio scan method (GLRSM) for multiple change-points inference in piecewise stationary time series, which estimates the number
and positions of change-points and provides a confidence interval for each change-point. The
computational complexity of using GLRSM for multiple change-points detection is as low as
O(n(log n)3 ) for a series of length n. Consistency of the estimated numbers and positions of
the change-points is established. Extensive simulation studies are provided to demonstrate the
effectiveness of the proposed methodology under different scenarios.
Keywords: confidence interval; likelihood ratio; piecewise stationary time series models; scan
statistics; structural break; structural change.
∗
Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.
Email:
[email protected]
†
Department of Statistics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Email:
[email protected]
‡
Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.
[email protected]. Supported in part by HKSAR-RGC Grants CUHK405012, 405113 and 14601015
1
Email:
1
Introduction
Change-point detection has been recognized as an important issue in econometrics, biology, and
engineering for decades. Extensive literature has explored the detection of change-points in time
series models. Picard (1985) first studied the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of changepoints in autoregressive (AR) models. Bai et al. (1998) extends Picard’s method for change-points
in multivariate AR and cointegrating models. Recently, multiple change-points problems have
attracted growing attention. For example, Ombao et al. (2001) divides a time series into dyadic
segments by minimizing an objective function and Braun et al. (2000) employs quasi-likelihood
to detect multiple change-points in DNA sequences. Depending on whether the entire data set is
considered as a whole or each data point is processed sequentially, change-point detection problems
can be classified as off-line or on-line respectively. In this paper we focus on off-line change-point
detection.
Under the off-line setting, when the number of change-points is unknown, a common approach
is to search for the set of change-points that minimizes certain objective functions, for example, the
least-squares criterion for a change in the mean of a series (see Yao and Au (1989), Lavielle and
Moulines (2000)), and minimum description length criterion for changes in model parameters (Davis
et al. (2006)). However, such optimization procedures usually come with high computational costs
because the number of possible combinations of change-points grows exponentially with sample size.
Some attempts to reduce the computational burden include the genetic algorithm in Davis et al.
(2006, 2008) and the pruned exact linear time (PELT) method in Killick et al. (2012). Nevertheless,
the genetic algorithm involves many tuning parameters, while the computational cost of the PELT
is close to O(n2 ) if the number of change-points does not increase linearly with the length of the
time series n. Yau and Zhao (2016) proposed the likelihood ratio scan method (LRSM) to identify
multiple change-points for piecewise stationary AR models. The computation can be performed
with order O(n log n), which is lower than the standard order of O(n2 ).
In practice, merely reporting the positions of the structural changes in the series does not pro-
2
vide complete information. A more informative description of change-points could be provided by
confidence intervals (CI). To obtain the CIs, the asymptotic distribution of the change-point estimator is required. There is an extensive literature concerning limiting distribution of change-point
estimators for independence sequences. Hinkley (1970) investigated maximum likelihood estimator
of change-points in a sequence of i.i.d. random variables and proved that the estimated changepoint converges in distribution to the location of the maxima of a double-sided random walk.
Bhattacharya and Brockwell (1976) derived the limiting distribution of change-point estimators for
independent errors under local changes. Yao (1987) showed that Hinkley’s (1970) limiting distribution can be approximated by distribution which can be analytically tackled. Dümbgen (1991)
investigated asymptotic behavior of non-parametric change-point estimators. Bai (1995) studied
a structural-changed regression model and showed that the estimated change-point converges in
distribution to the location of the maxima of a double-sided random walk. For a survey of various results, see Csörgö and Horváth (1997) and Antoch and Huskova (1999). For the time series
case, Antoch et al. (1997) derived the asymptotic distribution of the change-point estimator for
linear process with a change in mean. Recently, the asymptotic distribution of maximum likelihood estimator for a change-point in the parameters of time series models was established by Ling
(2016), showing that the estimated change-point converges weakly to the location of the maxima
of a double-sided random walk.
In this paper, we propose a generalized LRSM (GLRSM) for multiple change-point inference in
general time series models. Performing GLRSM involves three steps: first, a likelihood ratio scan
statistic is used to obtain a possibly overestimated set of change-points; second, a model selection
procedure is employed to give a set of consistent change-point estimates and, finally, a confidence
interval is constructed for each estimated change-point. The GLRSM procedure thus provides a
computationally efficient and automated procedure for change-point inference in time series.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review the basic settings of the change-point
problem. In Section 3, we develop the GLRSM on general piecewise stationary time series based
on the confidence interval construction procedure. Simulation studies are reported in Section 4.
3
We conclude in Section 5. Technical proofs of the theorems and lemmas are provided in Section 6.
2
Basic settings and assumptions
In this section, we first review the basic settings of the change-point problem and the asymptotic
distribution of the change-point estimator in Ling (2016).
First we consider single change-point estimation in piecewise stationary processes. Assume that
the time series {Xt : t = 1, 2, . . . } is Ft -measurable, strictly stationary, ergodic, and generated by
Xt = g(θ, X t−1 , t ) ,
(1)
where Ft is the σ-field generated by {t , t−1 , . . . }, X t = (Xt , . . . , Xt−q ) or X t = (Xt , Xt−1 , . . . ),
θ is an unknown p × 1 parameter vector, and {t } are independently and identically distributed
(i.i.d.) innovations. The structure of the time series {Xt } is characterized by a measurable function
g and the parameter θ. We assume that the parameter space Θ is a bounded compact subset of
Rp and g is continuous with respect to θ.
We denote model (1) by M (θ 0 ) when the true parameter is θ = θ 0 . Let {X1 , . . . , Xn } be a
random sample realization consists of two independent processes
{X1 , . . . , Xτ10 } ∈ M (θ 01 ) and {Xτ10 +1 , . . . , Xn } ∈ M (θ 02 ) ,
(2)
where τ10 ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n − 1} is the change-point satisfying δn < τ10 < (1 − δ)n for some small δ > 0,
and θ 01 , θ 02 ∈ Θ are unknown parameters in the two segments satisfying θ 01 6= θ 02 .
Define the conditional likelihood function lt (θ) ≡ log fθ (Xt |X t−1 ), where fθ is the conditional
density of Xt given previous observations. The likelihood for the change-point model (2) is
Ln (τ, θ 1 , θ 2 ) = L1n (τ, θ 1 ) + L2n (τ, θ 2 ) ,
where L1n (τ, θ 1 ) =
Pτ
t=1 lt (θ 1 )
and L2n (τ, θ 2 ) =
Pn
t=τ +1 lt (θ 2 )
are the log-conditional likelihood
functions for the first and second segment, respectively. For a given τ , let θ̂ 1n (τ ) and θ̂ 2n (τ ) be
the maximizer of L1n (τ, θ 1 ) and L2n (τ, θ 2 ) on Θ, respectively. The change-point τ is estimated by
τ̂ = arg max Ln [τ, θ̂ 1n (τ ), θ̂ 2n (τ )] .
1≤τ ≤n
4
(3)
The parameter estimates for the two segments are given by θ̂ 1 = θ̂ 1n (τ̂ ) and θ̂ 2 = θ̂ 2n (τ̂ ), respectively. Consistency of τ̂ , θ̂ 1 and θ̂ 2 are established in Ling (2016).
2.1
Asymptotic distribution of change-point estimators
For the change-point model (2), define the double-sided random walk
Pτ
0
0
t=1 (lt (θ 1 ) − lt (θ 2 )) , τ > 0 ,
Wτ = 0 ,
τ = 0,
P
−1 (lt (θ 02 ) − lt (θ 01 )) , τ < 0 .
t=τ
(4)
where Xt ∈ M (θ 02 ) when τ > 0 and Xt ∈ M (θ 01 ) when τ < 0. According to Theorem 2.2 (b) in
Ling (2016), for fixed θ 01 and θ 02 , we have that
d
τ̂1 − τ10 → arg max Wτ .
(5)
τ ∈Z
Note that the limit Wτ depends on the unknown parameters θ 01 and θ 02 and closed form expression for the distribution function is not available. Therefore, it is difficult to use (5) to construct
confidence intervals in practice. Theorem 3.1 in Ling (2016) derived an approximation for Wτ when
√
the parameter change was small. Specifically, if θ 01 − θ 02 = O(1/ n), then for any fixed M ,
!
ˆ0
ˆ0
−1
ˆ
ˆ (d Ω̂d)
(d Σ̂d)
2
arg max Wbm̂rc
r∈[−M,M ]
d
→ arg max
r∈[−M,M ]
1
B(r) − |r| ,
2
(6)
∂ 2 lt (θ)
1 PM
where B(r) is the standard Brownian motion in R, dˆ = θ̂ 1 − θ̂ 2 , Σ̂ = 2M
t=−M ∂θ∂θ 0 |θ̂ 2 ,
PM Dt (θ̂2 )
∂lt (θ)
1 PM
0
Ω̂ = 2M
and D̄ =
t=−M (Dt (θ̂ 2 ) − D̄)(Dt (θ̂ 2 ) − D̄) , where Dt (θ) =
−M 2M , m̂ =
∂θ
ˆ −2 (dˆ0 Ω̂d)
ˆ and bac is the largest integer not greater than a. Using (6) for a sufficiently large
(dˆ0 Σ̂d)
M , Ling (2016) suggests an approximate 100(1 − α)% CI given by
CI = τ̂1 − [∆Fα/2 ] − 1, τ̂1 + [∆Fα/2 ] + 1 ,
ˆ dˆ0 Σ̂d)
ˆ −2 and Fα/2 is the
where ∆ = (dˆ0 Ω̂d)(
α
2 -th
1
2 |r|}.
5
(7)
quantile of the distribution arg maxr∈R {B(r) −
3
Estimation of multiple change-points using the Likelihood Ratio
Scan Method
In this section, we propose an automated procedure for estimating and constructing confidence
intervals for multiple change-points. This procedure generalizes the Likelihood Ratio Scan Method
(LSRM) in Yau and Zhao (2016) from piecewise stationary AR models to general time series models.
First, we begin with some basic settings and assumptions.
3.1
Basic settings and assumptions
We assume that the observations {Xt }t=1,...,n can be partitioned into m+1 stationary processes.
For j = 1, . . . , m, the j-th segment Xj = {Xτj−1 +1 , . . . , Xτj } follows model M (θ j ), and τj is the j-th
change-point where the j-th segment of the process changes to the (j + 1)-th segment. Set τ0 , 0
and τm+1 , n. To develop asymptotic theory in change-point analysis, the length of each segment
must increase as the sample size increases. Let J = (τ1 , . . . , τm ) be the set of change-points. Define
λj to be the relative position of the j-th change-point satisfying τj = [λj n], j = 0, . . . , m + 1. We
assume that minj=0,...,m (λj+1 − λj ) > λ for some λ > 0.
3.2
Multiple change-points detection using scan statistics
In this subsection we state the three steps of the generalized LRSM (GLRSM) method for
multiple change-points inference. Discussions and asymptotic properties of GLRSM are given in
Section 3.3.
First step: Obtain potential change-points using scan statistics
For t = h, . . . , n − h, define the scanning window at t and the corresponding observations as
Wt (h) = {t − h + 1, . . . , t + h} and XWt (h) = (Xt−h+1 , . . . , Xt+h ) ,
respectively, where h is called the window radius. To establish asymptotic theory, we assume
that h = h(n) depends on the sample size n. Define the likelihood ratio scan statistic for the
6
scanning window Wt (h) by
Sh (t) =
1
1
1
L1h (t, θ̂ 1 ) + L2h (t, θ̂ 2 ) − L·h (t, θ̂) ,
h
h
h
where L1h (t, θ̂ 1 ), L2h (t, θ̂ 2 ), and L·h (t, θ̂) are the quasi-likelihoods formed by the observations
{Xs }s=t−h+1,...,t , {Xs }s=t+1,...,t+h , and {Xs }Wh (t) , evaluated at the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) θ̂ 1 , θ̂ 2 , and θ̂, respectively. To be specific, given a sample z = {z1 , . . . , zn },
the quasi-likelihood is defined as
L(θ) =
n
X
t=1
lt (θ) ≡
n
X
log fθ (zt |zt−1 , zt−2 , . . .) ,
t=1
where fθ (zt |zt−1 , zt−2 , . . . ) is the conditional density of zt given previous observations and
zs = 0 for s ≤ 0.
Next, scan the observed time series by using Sh (t) to yield a sequence of likelihood ratio scan
statistics (Sh (h), Sh (h + 1), . . . , Sh (n − h)). By construction, if t is a change-point, then Sh (t)
tends to be large. If h is chosen such that 2h < nλ , then at most one change-point exists
inside each scanning window. Therefore, we can obtain a set of potential change-points from
the local maximizers of Sh (·). Define the local change-point estimates as follows:
Jˆ(1) =
m ∈ {h, h + 1, . . . , n − h} : Sh (m) =
max
t∈(m−h,m+h]
Sh (t) ,
where Sh (t) , 0 for t < h and t > n − h. That is, m is a local change-point estimator if Sh (m)
is the maximum over the window [m − h + 1, m + h] centering at m. We denote the number of
elements in Jˆ(1) by m̂(1) . To further improve the computation efficiency, in practice we may
restrict the size of Jˆ(1) by keeping a pre-specified number of change-points with the greatest
Sh (m); see Yau and Zhao (2016).
Second step: Consistent estimation by model selection approach
The set of potential change-points Jˆ(1) obtained from the first step usually overestimates
the true set of change-points. To detect the true change-points, we select the best subset
7
from Jˆ(1) based on certain information criteria. We adopt the minimum description length
(MDL) criterion (see Davis et al. (2006, 2008)) which is found to give promising performance
in a number of empirical studies. Given a set of change-points J = (τ1 , . . . , τm ), the MDL
criterion is defined as
MDL(m, J ) = log(m) + (m + 1) log(n) +
cj
m+1
XX
log(ζj,k ) +
j=1 k=1
m+1
X
j=1
m+1
X
dj
log(nj ) −
Lj (θ̂ j ; Xj ) ,
2
j=1
where Lj (θ̂ j ; Xj ) is the quasi-likelihood for the j-piece, n1 , . . . , nm+1 are the segment lengths,
dj is the dimension of θ j , and ζj,1 , . . . , ζj,cj are integer-valued parameters that specify the order
of the model for the j-th segment.
Given the local change-point estimates Jˆ(1) , the refined change-points can be estimated by
(m̂(2) , Jˆ(2) ) =
MDL(m, J ) .
arg min
m=|J |,J ⊆Jˆ(1)
Note that searching for the best subset in Jˆ(1) is much more computationally efficient than
the traditional approach of optimizing the MDL over all possible change-point positions.
Third Step: Final change-point estimates and confidence intervals
Define the extended local-window and the corresponding observations for the j-th estimated
(2)
change-point τ̂j
∈ Jˆ(2) by
(2)
Ej (h) = {τ̂j
(2)
− 2h + 1, . . . , τ̂j
+ 2h} and XEj (h) = (Xτ̂ (2) −2h+1 , . . . , Xτ̂ (2) +2h ) ,
j
j
respectively. Note that this construction ensures that each true change-point is within ( 14 , 34 )
of each extended local window Ej (h) with probability approaching 1. Let Lj (τ, θ 1 , θ 2 ) =
Pτ
Pτ̂j(2) +2h
(2)
l
(θ
)
+
(2)
t
1
t=τ +1 lt (θ 2 ). For j = 1, . . . , m̂ , define the final estimate as
t=τ̂ −2h+1
j
(3)
τ̂j
=
arg max
(2)
Lj (τ, θ̂ j , θ̂ j+1 ) ,
(2)
τ ∈(τ̂j −h,τ̂j +h]
where θ̂ j = θ̂ j (τ ) = arg maxθ1
Pτ
l (θ ),
(2)
t=τ̂j −2h+1 t 1
and θ̂ j+1 is defined analogously. Then,
apply the procedures specified in Section 2.1 to obtain a confidence interval around each final
(3)
change-point estimate τ̂j .
8
In the first scanning step, given h, the computational complexity for evaluating Sh (t) for each
t is of order O(h) since the size of Wj (h) is 2h. In the second step, minimizing MDL over m̂(1)
change-point candidates requires a computational complexity of O((m̂(1) )2 n) when using the optimal partition (OP) method of Jackson et al. (2005). Finally, as the computation is restricted
to the extended local windows in the third step, the computational complexity is O(m̂(2) h2 ). As
both m̂(1) and m̂(2) are finite, the total computational complexity in the complete procedure to
find the final change-point estimates is O(nh + h2 ). As will be shown in Section 3.3, the condition
h = d(log n)3 is needed for some positive number d. When h is as small as the order of O((log n)3 ),
the computation for change-point detection can be completed in O(n(log n)3 ) steps. Therefore, the
complete three-step GLRSM requires the computational complexity of O n(log n)3 , which is lower
than the order of O(n2 ) using a dynamic programing algorithm.
The GLRSM procedure includes one tuning parameter, the window radius h. As will be shown
in Section 3.3, it is theoretically crucial to choose an h > d(log n)3 for Theorem 3.1 to hold, where
d is an unknown constant. If h is of an order larger than O((log n)3 ), e.g. h = d2 (log n)4 , then
the GLRSM is consistent for any choice of d2 . Based on our empirical studies, it is found that
d2 = 1/25 and h ≥ 100 usually yields favorable results for various models and sample sizes. Thus,
we suggest using max(100, (log n)4 /25) as a rule-of-thumb choice of h.
3.3
Asymptotic properties
In this subsection we investigate the asymptotic properties of the GLRSM procedure. Specifically, we show the consistency of the estimated number of change-points and the coverage accuracy
of the confidence intervals. We introduce the following assumptions.
Assumption 3.1. For any two consecutive segments Xj = {Xτj−1 +1 , . . . , Xτj } and Xj+1 =
{Xτj +1 , . . . , Xτj+1 }, the expectation of the conditional likelihood function E[lk (θ)] has a unique
maximizer at θ = θ 0j for k ∈ {τj−1 + 1, . . . , τj } and at θ = θ 0j+1 for k ∈ {τj + 1, . . . , τj+1 }, with
θ 0j 6= θ 0j+1 . Moreover, E[lk (θ 0j+1 )] < E[lk (θ 0j )] for k ∈ {τj−1 +1, . . . , τj } and E[lk (θ 0j )] < E[lk (θ 0j+1 )]
for k ∈ {τj + 1, . . . , τj+1 }.
9
Assumption 3.2. Within any segment, lk (θ) is a measurable and continuous function with respect
to {Xt }, and is almost surely twice continuously differentiable with respect to θ.
Assumption 3.3. Let Yk (θ) = lk (θ) − E [lk (θ)]. For all θ ∈ Θ, there exists a K > 0 such that
E(e|Yk (θ)| ) ≤ K for all k ∈ N.
Assumption 3.4. For all θ j ∈ Θj , there exists an integrable function G(X t ) such that E(G(X t )) <
∞ and |lt (θ j )| ≤ G(X t ).
Theorem 3.1 below asserts that all change-points can be identified in an h-neighborhood of Jˆ(1) .
0 ) and the set of local changeTheorem 3.1. Let the set of true change-points be J0 = (τ10 , . . . , τm
0
(1) (1)
(1)
point estimates be Jˆ(1) = {τ̂1 , τ̂2 , . . . , τ̂m̂(1) }, where m̂(1) = |Jˆ(1) |. Suppose Assumptions 3.1-3.4
hold, 2h < nλ and λ > c for some c > 0, then there exists some d > 0 such that for h ≥ d(log n)3 ,
P max
min
τ ∈J0 k=1,...,m̂(1)
|τ −
(1)
τ̂k |
< h → 1.
Note that as the minimum distance between change-points is nλ = O(n), the true number of
change-points m0 is finite. However, there is no guarantee that m̂(1) equals the number of changepoints. That is, the number of change-points may be overestimated. Nevertheless, the following
theorem shows that the MDL model selection approach yields the consistency of the number and
positions of the change-points.
p
Theorem 3.2. Under the setting in Theorem 3.1 with λ > c for some c > 0, we have m̂(2) → m0 .
In addition, given that m̂(2) = m0 , we have
P
max |τ̂
j=1,...,m0
(2)
−
τj0 |
< h → 1.
(2)
Since h > d(log n)3 → ∞, Theorem 3.2 implies that maxj=1,...,m0 |τ̂j −τj0 | = Op (h), which is not
optimal compared with the typical rate of Op (1). Nevertheless, the interval [τ̂j − h + 1, τ̂j + h] covers
the true change-point τj0 with probability approaching 1. This allows the extended local-window
to yield consistent final estimates and confidence intervals.
10
Theorem 3.3. Assume that the conditions of Theorem 3.2 hold, 3h < nλ , and Assumption 3.4
holds. Then, we have
(3)
τ̂j
d
− τj0 → arg max Wj,τ ,
τ ∈Z
where Wj,τ is a double-sided random walk defined as
Pτj0 +τ
(l (θ 0 ) − lt (θ 0j+1 )) ,
t=τj0 +1 t j
Wj,τ = 0 ,
P 0
τj 0
(l (θ 0 ) − lt (θ 0j )) ,
t=τ +τ +1 t j+1
τ > 0,
τ = 0,
τ < 0.
j
(3)
In particular, τ̂j
− τj0 = Op (1).
As the minimum distance between change-points is much larger than the window radius h, i.e.,
nλ /h → ∞, the distances between the extended local windows Ej (h)s diverge to ∞. Under some
weak dependence conditions on the processes, the CIs constructed are asymptotic independent.
Thus, a Bonferroni-type argument implies that an approximate 1 − α simultaneous confidence
interval for all the m̂(2) change points can be constructed by a collection of (1 − α)1/m̂
(2)
CIs for
each of a set of m̂(2) change points.
4
Simulation studies
In this section, we examine the finite sample performance of GLRSM via extensive simulation
studies. In Sections 4.1, we study the performance of GLRSM on various models. In Section 4.2, we
compare GLRSM to other methods in the literature, including Fryzlewicz and Subba Rao (2014),
in terms of the performance of change-point detection.
4.1
Performance of GLRSM
In this section, we apply GLRSM to multiple change-points problems in different piecewise
stationary time series models, including AR, ARMA, and GARCH models. Also, the rule-of-thumb
choice of h = max(100, (log n)4 /25) for the window radius is employed.
11
We applied GLRSM on the piecewise stationary processes generated from multiple change-point
Models (C) to (G) listed below. Realizations of these models are given in Figure 1. In each model,
i.i.d.
t ∼ N (0, 1). The estimation results are summarized in Table 1.
Model (D)
−4
−4
−2
−2
0
0
2
2
4
4
Model (C)
200
400
600
800
1000
0
500
1000
Time
Time
Model (E)
Model (F)
1500
2000
1500
2000
−6
−4
−4
−2
−2
0
0
2
2
4
4
6
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
500
1000
Time
Time
−10
−5
0
5
10
Model (G)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Time
Figure 1: Realizations from Models (C) to (G). Vertical lines represent change-point positions
(C). Piecewise stationary AR(1) processes
0.4Xt−1 + t ,
Xt = −0.6Xt−1 + t ,
0.5Xt−1 + t ,
(D). Piecewise stationary AR(2) processes
12
if 1 ≤ t ≤ 400 ,
if 401 ≤ t ≤ 700 ,
if 701 ≤ t ≤ 1000 .
Model
τ0
Median
Mean
90% Range
Mean of 90% CI
Coverage Prob.
400
400
400.78
[391, 411]
[393.62, 407.94]
83.2%
700
700
700.09
[691, 710]
[694.18, 705.99]
83.1%
1000
1000
999.35
[991, 1007]
[994.68, 1004.02]
81.7%
1500
1500
1499.66
[1487, 1511]
[1490.83, 1508.50]
84.6%
400
400
400.56
[394, 407]
[397.81, 403.31]
71.1%
600
600
599.38
[593, 605]
[595.37, 603.39]
85.2%
800
800
800.01
[793, 806]
[795.08, 804.95]
85.8%
1200
1200
1199.18
[1188, 1209]
[1191.55, 1206.81]
84.7%
400
399
398.92
[391, 406]
[394.76, 403.09]
78.6%
1600
1600
1599.72
[1593, 1609]
[1593.51, 1605.92]
82.5%
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
Table 1: True value (τ 0 ), median, mean and the range of the middle 90% (90% Range) of the final estimates,
average of the end-points (mean of 90% CI) and coverage probability (Coverage Prob.) of 90% confidence intervals
for Models (C) to (G). The number of replications is 1000.
0.7Xt−1 + 0.1Xt−2 + t ,
Xt = −0.4Xt−1 t ,
0.5Xt−1 − 0.2Xt−2 + t ,
if 1 ≤ t ≤ 1000 ,
if 1001 ≤ t ≤ 1500 ,
if 1501 ≤ t ≤ 2000 .
(E). Piecewise stationary ARMA(1,1) processes
−0.8Xt−1 + t + 0.5t−1 , if 1 ≤ t ≤ 400 ,
Xt = 0.9Xt−1 + t ,
if 401 ≤ t ≤ 600 ,
0.1Xt−1 + t − 0.5t−1 ,
if 601 ≤ t ≤ 1000 .
(F). Piecewise stationary ARMA processes up to order 2
−0.6Xt−1 − 0.2Xt−2 + t , if 1 ≤ t ≤ 800 ,
Xt = 0.4Xt−1 + t + 0.3t−1 ,
if 801 ≤ t ≤ 1200 ,
t − 0.3t−1 − 0.2t−2 ,
if 1201 ≤ t ≤ 2000 .
13
(G). Piecewise stationary GARCH processes
Xt = t σt ,
σt2 =
2 + 0.5σ 2 ,
3 + 0.1Xt−1
t−1
if 1 ≤ t ≤ 400 ,
2 + 0.5σ 2 , if 401 ≤ t ≤ 1600 ,
0.5 + 0.1Xt−1
t−1
2 + 0.8σ 2 , if 1601 ≤ t ≤ 2000 .
0.8 + 0.1Xt−1
t−1
When performing GLRSM on ARMA(p,q) models such as Model (E) and (F), in consideration
of the computation complexity and the robustness of AR models, we conduct the first two steps
(2)
using piecewise AR models. After obtaining τ̂j
from the second step, we use the ARMA models
(3)
to conduct the third step and compute the final estimate τ̂j , and construct the corresponding
confidence intervals for each change-point estimate. Note that the consistency of the change-point
estimator does not require that the true models be specified since the asymptotic results in Theorem
3.1 and 3.2 for the change-point estimates are valid when Assumptions 3.1-3.4 hold.
From Table 1, it can be seen that the final change-points estimates are accurate and the coverage
probability is quite close to the nominal level of 90%. Taking into account all the simulation results,
we conclude that GLRSM has a stable performance in most scenarios.
4.2
GARCH change-point detection performance evaluation
In this section we compare the detection accuracy of GLRSM to other multiple change-point
estimation procedures such as the BASTA-res in Fryzlewicz and Subba Rao (2014). The codes for
the BASTA-res are available at http://stats.lse.ac.uk/fryzlewicz/basta/basta.html. Following the
same setting in Fryzlewicz and Subba Rao (2014), we consider different GARCH(1,1) models with
sample size n = 1000 and one change-point occurring at time t = 500, i.e.,
2 + β σ 2 , if 1 ≤ t ≤ 500 ,
ω1 + α1 Xt−1
1 t−1
2
Xt = t σt ,
σt =
ω + α X 2 + β σ 2 , if 501 ≤ t ≤ 1000 ,
2
2
t−1
i.i.d.
2 t−1
where t ∼ N (0, 1). The following ten change-point models are studied.
14
Model
(ω1 , α1 , β1 )
(ω2 , α2 , β2 )
Model
(ω1 , α1 , β1 )
(ω2 , α2 , β2 )
(a)
(0.4, 0.1, 0.5)
(0.4, 0.1, 0.5)
(b)
(0.1, 0.1, 0.8)
(0.1, 0.1, 0.8)
(c)
(0.4, 0.1, 0.5)
(0.4, 0.1, 0.6)
(d)
(0.4, 0.1, 0.5)
(0.4, 0.1, 0.8)
(e)
(0.1, 0.1, 0.8)
(0.1, 0.1, 0.7)
(f)
(0.1, 0.1, 0.8)
(0.1, 0.1, 0.4)
(g)
(0.4, 0.1, 0.5)
(0.5, 0.1, 0.5)
(h)
(0.4, 0.1, 0.5)
(0.8, 0.1, 0.5)
(i)
(0.1, 0.1, 0.8)
(0.3, 0.1, 0.8)
(j)
(0.1, 0.1, 0.8)
(0.5, 0.1, 0.8)
Note that there is no change-point in Models (a) and (b). Since the BASTA-res does not produce
confidence intervals for the change-points, only the proportion of correct number, mean, median,
and the standard error of the estimated change-points are compared. The simulation results are
summarized in Table 2.
From Table 2, when the structural change is small (Models (c), (e) and (g)), the performance
of GLRSM is not as good as the BASTA-res method in Fryzlewicz and Subba Rao (2014). One
possible reason is that the short scanning window has less power to identify the change-point when
the change is small. However, the GLRSM has higher credibility when no structural change actually
occurs (Models (a) and (b)). Also, the GLRSM performs significantly better when the structural
difference is large (Models (d), (f) and (j)). In all scenarios, the biases of the change-point estimates
given by GLRSM and BASTA-res are similar. However, the standard error of the change-point
estimates by GLRSM is always smaller than the standard error by BASTA-res. That is, compared
with BASTA-res, the change-point estimates by GLRSM have higher precision.
5
Conclusion
In this paper, we developed GLRSM as a computationally efficient procedure for multiple
change-points inference in general time series models. Compared with other methods that only
yield point estimates, the GLRSM provides a confidence interval around each estimated changepoint. The results of the simulations and real data analyses indicated that the GLRSM performs
well in change-points detection and has accurate coverage probabilities. In this paper, the use of
15
Method
Statistic
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Accuracy rate
94.0%
89.0%
34.8%
78.4%
71.4%
Mean of est.
NA
NA
519.99
502.70
493.04
Median of est.
NA
NA
503
501
499
s.e. of est.
NA
NA
148.43
24.16
91.99
Accuracy rate
100%
100%
4.2%
95.2%
21.8%
Mean of est.
NA
NA
520.71
504.27
484.80
Median of est.
NA
NA
505
501
493
s.e. of est.
NA
NA
43.30
21.61
50.67
Statistic
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Accuracy rate
77.8%
25.2%
89.0%
68.0%
70.4%
Mean of est.
499.34
490.85
497.93
500.07
502.66
Median of est.
501
495.5
500
501
501
s.e. of est.
15.82
150.26
75.84
47.53
20.13
Accuracy rate
93.4%
0.4%
65.2%
69.6%
93.2%
Mean of est.
499.68
461.50
502.75
499.57
503.90
Median of est.
500
461.5
501
501
501
s.e. of est.
13.41
111.02
43.88
43.98
19.31
BASTA-res
GLRSM
Method
BASTA-res
GLRSM
Table 2: Proportion of times that the correct number of change-points was detected, mean, median and standard
error (s.e.) of the change-point estimates for different estimation methods for Models (a) to (j). For GLRSM, the
scan window radius h = max(100, (log n)4 /25) is used, where n is the length of the series. The number of replications
is 500.
likelihood ratio scan statistics is restricted to univariate time series models. Nevertheless, with
proper modifications to the scanning procedures and large deviation bounds, the GLRSM could
potentially be extended to multivariate settings.
16
6
Proofs
First we state the following lemmas about the asymptotic properties of the likelihood ratio scan
statistics, Sh (t), which are required to prove Theorem 3.1.
Lemma 6.1. For the j-th change-point τj0 , the scan statistic Sh (τj0 ) satisfies
1
1
1
L1h (τj0 , θ̂ 1 ) + L2h (τj0 , θ̂ 2 ) − L·h (τj0 , θ̂ 1,2 )
h
h
h
fk,θ2 (θ 2 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
p
+ E log
, gj > 0 ,
→ E log
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
fk,θ2 (θ 1,2 )
Sh (τj0 ) =
where
θ̂ 1,2
1
= arg max
h
θ∈Θ
τ0
τj0 +h
j
X
X
lk,θ1 (θ) +
k=τj0 −h+1
lk,θ2 (θ) ,
k=τj0 +1
and
θ 1,2 = arg max E lk,θ1 (θ) + E lk,θ2 (θ) .
θ∈Θ
Lemma 6.2. For any >0, there exists a positive integer H such that for any h > H,
1
P(|Sh (t)| > ) ≤ 6 exp(− h1/3 2/3 ) ,
4
for all t such that Wt (h) does not contain any change-point.
Lemma 6.3. For any > 0, there exists a positive integer H such that for any h > H,
1
P |Sh (τj0 ) − gj | > ≤ 22 exp(− h1/3 2/3 ) ,
4
for all j = 1, . . . , m0 .
Proof of Theorem 3.1: Let At = {some point in the t-th local-window is a local change-point
T
estimate} and let A = t∈J0 At . The proof of Theorem 3.1 is completed if we can prove P(A)→ 1
as n → ∞.
S
Let Zn = {1, 2, . . . , n}. Define E = Zn \{ t∈J0 Wt (h)} as the set of all points outside the
h-neighborhood of the true change-points. One sufficient condition for the event A to occur is that
min Sh (t) > max Sh (t) .
t∈J0
t∈E
17
(8)
Let g =
1
2
minj=1,...,m0 (gj ) where gj ’s are defined in Lemma 6.1. Note from (8) that
P(A) ≥ P min Sh (t) > g > max Sh (t) .
t∈J0
t∈E
(9)
From Lemma 6.3 and the definition of g, it can be shown that P Sh (t) ≤ g ≤ 22 exp(− 14 h1/3 g 2/3 ),
for all t ∈ J0 . Thus,
P min Sh (t) > g = 1 − P
t∈J0
[
X
{Sh (t) ≤ g} ≥ 1 −
P(Sh (t) ≤ g)
t∈J0
t∈J0
(10)
1
≥ 1 − 22m0 exp(− h1/3 g 2/3 ) → 1 ,
4
provided that h = d(log n)3 for some d > 0 and m0 = O(1). When t ∈ E, all observations in Sh (t)
belong to one stationary piece. By Lemma 6.2, we have P(Sh (t) ≥ g) < 6 exp(− 14 h1/3 g 2/3 ) for all
t ∈ E. Let h = d(log n)3 for some d > 64/g 2 , we have
P g > max Sh (t) = 1 − P
t∈E
[
m
0 +1
X
0
{Sh (t) ≥ g} ≥ 1 −
(τj0 − τj−1
)P(Sh (tj ) ≥ g)
j=1
t∈E
(11)
1
> 1 − 6n exp(− h1/3 g 2/3 ) → 1 ,
4
0
where tj ∈ (τj−1
+ h, τj0 − h). Combining (9), (10), and (11) yields P(A) → 1 when h = d(log n)3
for some d > 64/g 2 , completing the proof of Theorem 3.1.
Proof of Theorem 3.2: The proof of this theorem is essentially the same as that of Theorem 2
in Yau and Zhao (2016), and hence is omitted.
Proof of Theorem 3.3:
Based on Assumption 3.4, there exists a function G(Z t ) that dominates
|lt (θ j )| for all θ j ∈ Θj . By using the uniform law of large number (ULLN) in Jennrich (1969), we
P
have as h → ∞, h1 ht=1 lt (θ j ) converges uniformly to Eθ0 (lt (θ j )), ∀θ j ∈ Θj . The remaining part
j
of the proof is the same as that of Theorem 3 in Yau and Zhao (2016).
In practice, if the form of the underlying model is known, it is not difficult to find a dominating
function G(Z t ) that satisfying Assumption 3.4. For example, if an AR(p) model is used, we can
P
P
take G(Zt , . . . , Zt−p ) = | 21 log(2πσ 2 )| + ( pj=0 Zj2 + 2 i6=j |Zi Zj |)/2σ 2 .
18
Proof of Lemma 6.1: Denote the conditional likelihood function at time k given Fk−1 with parameter θ as f (Xk , θ). As h → ∞, we have
θ̂ 1,2
1
= arg max
h
θ∈Θ
τ0
τj0 +h
j
X
X
l1 (k, θ) +
k=τj0 −h+1
l2 (k, θ)
k=τj0 +1
p
= arg max E l1 (k, θ) + E l2 (k, θ) + op (1) → θ 1,2 .
θ∈Θ
p
p
Combining with θ̂ 1 → θ 1 and θ̂ 2 → θ 2 , we have
Sh (τj0 )
1
=
h
τ0
j
X
k=τj0 −h+1
τ 0 +h
j
1
1 X
log(fk,θ1 (θ̂ 1 ) +
log(fk,θ2 (θ̂ 2 )) −
h
h
0
k=τj +1
τ0
j
X
log(fk,θ1 (θ̂ 1,2 ))
k=τj0 −h+1
τj0 +h
−
1 X
log(fk,θ2 (θ̂ 1,2 ))
h
0
k=τj +1
τ0
j
X
τ 0 +h
j
fk,θ2 (θ̂ 2 )
1 X
log
+
log
fk,θ1 (θ̂ 1,2 ) h k=τ 0 +1
fk,θ2 (θ̂ 1,2 )
k=τj0 −h+1
j
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
fk,θ2 (θ 2 )
p
→ E log
+ E log
= gj .
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
fk,θ2 (θ 1,2 )
1
=
h
fk,θ1 (θ̂ 1 )
(12)
For the first expectation in (12), the Jensen’s Inequality implies that
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
= −E log
≥ − log E
.
E log
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
Since the observations come from the segment with the true parameter θ 1 , we thus have
Z ∞
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
log E
= log
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )dxk = log 1 = 0 .
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
−∞ fk,θ 1 (θ 1 )
Notice that since θ 1,2 depends on two distinct time series models specified by θ 1 and θ 2 respectively,
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1,2 )
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
→ c a.s., where c is a constant. Also,
fk,θ1 (θ 1 )
the log-function is not a linear function. Therefore, E log fk,θ
(θ 1,2 ) > 0, and the equality could
then
does not satisfy the condition that
1
not be achieved. Finally, using similar arguments for the second expectation in (12), we have
gj > 0, and thus Lemma 6.1 follows.
Proof of Lemma 6.2: When there is no change-point in the scanning window Wt (h), we use the
notation lk (θ) to represent lk,θ0 (θ), since all data are from the segment specified by θ 0 . Hence, we
19
can write the scan statistic as
1
Sh (t) =
h
t
X
t+h
1 X
1
[lk (θ̂ 1 ) − lk (θ 0 )] +
[lk (θ̂ 2 ) − lk (θ 0 )] −
h
h
k=t−h+1
k=t+1
t+h
X
[lk (θ̂) − lk (θ 0 )] ,
(13)
k=t−h+1
where θ̂ 1 , θ̂ 2 , and θ̂ are the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) of the parameter θ in the left
half, right half, and the entire scanning window, respectively.
We first decompose the third sum in (13) into the following form,
1
h
t+h
X
1
h
[lk (θ̂) − lk (θ 0 )] =
k=t−h+1
t+h
X
[lk (θ̂) − E(lk (θ̂))] −
k=t−h+1
1
h
t+h
X
[lk (θ 0 ) − E(lk (θ 0 ))]
k=t−h+1
+ [E(lk (θ̂)) − E(lk (θ 0 ))] .
(14)
By Assumptions 3.2, 3.3 and the compactness of the parameter space Θ, there exists a positive
constant K ∗ , such that E(e|Yk (θ)| ) ≤ K ∗ for all k ∈ N and θ ∈ Θ. Then by Theorem 3.2 of Lesigne
and Volnỳ (2001), for any > 0, there exists a positive integer H0 depending only on K ∗ and ,
such that for any h > H0 and θ ∈ Θ,
P
1
h
t+h
X
1 1/3 2/3
[lk (θ) − E(lk (θ))] > /3 ≤ e− 4 h ,
(15)
k=t−h+1
Moreover, the exponential moment condition E(e|Yk (θ)| ) ≤ K ∗ for all θ ∈ Θ also implies the uniform
p
integrability of {lk (θ) : θ ∈ Θ}. Thus, together with θ̂ → θ 0 , we have that for any > 0, there
exists a constant H1 > 0 such that for any h > H1 ,
E(lk (θ̂)) − E(lk (θ 0 )) < /3 .
(16)
As a result, applying (15) on both θ̂ and θ 0 and (16) we have that for any > 0, there exists a
positive integer H ∗ such that for any h > H ∗ ,
P
1
h
t+h
X
1 1/3 2/3
[lk (θ̂) − lk (θ 0 )] > ≤ 2e− 4 h .
k=t−h+1
Similarly exponential inequalities hold for the other two sums in (13), hence Lemma 6.2 follows.
Proof of Lemma 6.3: Using the notations in Lemma 6.1, we have
Sh (τj0 )
1
− gj =
h
τ0
j
X
k=τj0 −h+1
0
τX
j +h
1
lk,θ1 (θ̂ 1 ) − E(lk,θ1 (θ 1 )) +
lk,θ2 (θ̂ 2 ) − E(lk,θ2 (θ 2 ))
h
0
k=τj +1
20
τ0
j
X
1
−
h
τ0
1
=
h
k=τj0 −h+1
1
lk,θ1 (θ̂ 1 ) − (lk,θ1 (θ 1 ) +
h
τ 0 +h
j
1 X
+
h
0
lk,θ2 (θ̂ 2 ) − (lk,θ2 (θ 2 )
k=τj +1
1
+
h
k=τj0 −h+1
j
X
lk,θ1 (θ̂ 1,2 ) + lk+h,θ2 (θ̂ 1,2 ) − E lk,θ1 (θ 1,2 ) − E lk+h,θ2 (θ 1,2 )
τ0
j
X
τ0
j
X
lk,θ1 (θ 1 ) − E(lk,θ1 (θ 1 ))
k=τj0 −h+1
τj0 +h
1 X
+
lk,θ1 (θ 2 ) − E(lk,θ2 (θ 2 ))
h
0
k=τj +1
lk,θ1 (θ̂ 1,2 ) + lk+h,θ2 (θ̂ 1,2 ) − lk,θ1 (θ 1,2 ) + lk+h,θ2 (θ 1,2 )
k=τj0 −h+1
τ0
j
X
1
+
h
k=τj0 −h+1
1
lk,θ1 (θ 1,2 ) − E lk,θ1 (θ 1,2 ) +
h
τ0
j
X
lk,θ2 (θ 1,2 ) − E lk+h,θ2 (θ 1,2 ) .
k=τj0 −h+1
(17)
By Lemma 6.2, we have that for any > 0, there exists a constant H2 > 0 such that for any h > H2 ,
P
1
h
τ0
j
X
P
−
lk,θ1 (τj0 , θ 1 )
1 1/3 2/3
> ≤ 6e− 4 h ,
k=τj0 −h+1
and
lk,θ1 (τj0 , θ̂ 1 )
τ 0 +h
j
1 X
h
0
lk,θ2 (τj0 , θ̂ 2 )
−
lk,θ2 (τj0 , θ 2 )
1 1/3 2/3
> ≤ 6e− 4 h .
k=τj +1
∂
sumption 3.2 gives E ∂θ
∂
∂θ E
lk,θ1 (θ) + lk,θ2 (θ) θ=θ1,2 = 0. Combining with As
∂
lk,θ1 (θ1,2 ) + lk,θ2 (θ1,2 ) = 0. Hence, ∂θ
lk,θ1 (θ 1,2 ) + lk+h,θ2 (θ 1,2 ) is a
By the definition of θ1,2 , we have
martingale difference sequence. Using similar arguments in the proof of Lemma 6.2, we have that
for any > 0, there exists a constant H3 > 0 such that for any h > H3 ,
P
1
h
τ0
j
X
lk,θ1 (τj0 , θ̂ 1,2 )+lk+h,θ2 (τj0 , θ̂ 1,2 )
−
lk,θ1 (τj0 , θ 1,2 )+lk+h,θ2 (τj0 , θ 1,2 )
1 1/3 2/3
> ≤ 6e− 4 h .
k=τj0 −h+1
The remaining four terms in (17) can be bounded by considering the large deviation probabilities
Pτj0
of h1 k=τ
0 −h+1 lk,θ 1 (θ 1 ) − E(lk,θ 1 (θ 1 )). For example, let Yk (θ 1 ) = lk,θ 1 (θ 1 ) − E(lk,θ 1 (θ 1 )). Note
j
that {Yk (θ 1 )} is a martingale difference sequence. By Assumption 3.3 and Theorem 3.2 of Lesigne
21
and Volnỳ (2001), for any > 0, there exists a constant H4 > 0 such that for any h > H4 ,
P
1
h
τ0
j
X
Yk ≥
1
1/3 2/3
≤ e− 4 h
.
k=τj0 −h+1
Therefore, the large deviation probability for every term in (17) has been obtained. The large
deviation bound for Sh (τj0 ) − gj can thus be established and the proof is complete.
References
Antoch, J. and Huskova, M. (1999). Estimators of changes. In Asymptotics, Nonparametrics, and
Time Series (ed. S. Ghosh), pages 533–578.
Antoch, J., Hušková, M., and Prášková, Z. (1997). Effect of dependence on statistics for determination of change. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 60(2):291–310.
Bai, J. (1995). Least absolute deviation estimation of a shift. Econometric Theory, 11(3):403–436.
Bai, J., Lumsdaine, R. L., and Stock, J. H. (1998). Testing for and dating common breaks in
multivariate time series. The Review of Economic Studies, 65(3):395–432.
Bhattacharya, P. K. and Brockwell, P. J. (1976). The minimum of an additive process with applications to signal estimation and storage theory. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und
Verwandte Gebiete, 37(1):51–75.
Braun, J. V., Braun, R., and Müller, H.-G. (2000). Multiple changepoint fitting via quasilikelihood,
with application to dna sequence segmentation. Biometrika, 87(2):301–314.
Csörgö, M. and Horváth, L. (1997). Limit theorems in change-point analysis. John Wiley & Sons
Inc.
Davis, R. A., Lee, T. C. M., and Rodriguez-Yam, G. A. (2006). Structural break estimation for
nonstationary time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(473):223–
239.
22
Davis, R. A., Lee, T. C. M., and Rodriguez-Yam, G. A. (2008). Break detection for a class of
nonlinear time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 29(5):834–867.
Dümbgen, L. (1991). The asymptotic behavior of some nonparametric change-point estimators.
The Annals of Statistics, 19(3):1471–1495.
Fryzlewicz, P. and Subba Rao, S. (2014). Multiple-change-point detection for auto-regressive conditional heteroscedastic processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: series B (statistical
methodology), 76(5):903–924.
Hinkley, D. V. (1970).
Inference about the change-point in a sequence of random variables.
Biometrika, 57(1):1–17.
Jackson, B., Scargle, J. D., Barnes, D., Arabhi, S., Alt, A., Gioumousis, P., Gwin, E., Sangtrakulcharoen, P., Tan, L., and Tsai, T. T. (2005). An algorithm for optimal partitioning of data
on an interval. Signal Processing Letters, IEEE, 12(2):105–108.
Jennrich, R. I. (1969). Asymptotic properties of non-linear least squares estimators. The Annals
of Mathematical Statistics, 40(2):633–643.
Killick, R., Fearnhead, P., and Eckley, I. (2012). Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear
computational cost. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(500):1590–1598.
Lavielle, M. and Moulines, E. (2000). Least-squares estimation of an unknown number of shifts in
a time series. Journal of time series analysis, 21(1):33–59.
Lesigne, E. and Volnỳ, D. (2001). Large deviations for martingales. Stochastic processes and their
applications, 96(1):143–159.
Ling, S. (2016). Estimation of change-points in linear and nonlinear time series models. Econometric
Theory, 32(02):402–430.
23
Ombao, H. C., Raz, J. A., von Sachs, R., and Malow, B. A. (2001). Automatic statistical analysis of
bivariate nonstationary time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(454):543–
560.
Picard, D. (1985). Testing and estimating change-points in time series. Advances in applied probability, 17:841–867.
Yao, Y. C. (1987). Approximating the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimate of the
change-point in a sequence of independent random variables. The Annals of Statistics, 15:1321–
1328.
Yao, Y. C. and Au, S. (1989). Least-squares estimation of a step function. Sankhyā: The Indian
Journal of Statistics, Series A, 51(3):370–381.
Yau, C. Y. and Zhao, Z. (2016). Inference for multiple change points in time series via likelihood
ratio scan statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 78:895–916.
24
| 10math.ST
|
Generating High-Quality Query Suggestion Candidates
for Task-Based Search
Heng Ding1,2 , Shuo Zhang2 , Darı́o Garigliotti2 , and Krisztian Balog2
1
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
[email protected], <firstname.lastname>@uis.no
arXiv:1802.07997v1 [cs.IR] 22 Feb 2018
2
Abstract. We address the task of generating query suggestions for task-based
search. The current state of the art relies heavily on suggestions provided by a
major search engine. In this paper, we solve the task without reliance on search
engines. Specifically, we focus on the first step of a two-stage pipeline approach,
which is dedicated to the generation of query suggestion candidates. We present
three methods for generating candidate suggestions and apply them on multiple information sources. Using a purpose-built test collection, we find that these
methods are able to generate high-quality suggestion candidates.
1
Introduction
Query suggestions, recommending a list of relevant queries to an initial user input,
are an integral part of modern search engines [8]. Accordingly, this task has received
considerable attention over the last decade [1, 2, 7]. Traditional approaches, however, do
not consider the larger underlying task the user is trying to accomplish. In this paper, we
focus on generating query suggestions for supporting task-based search. Specifically,
we follow the problem definition of the task understanding task from the TREC Tasks
track: given an initial query, the system should return a ranked list of suggestions “that
represent the set of all tasks a user who submitted the query may be looking for” [14].
Thus, the overall goal is to provide a complete coverage of aspects (subtasks) for an
initial query, while avoiding redundancy.
We envisage a user interface where task-based query suggestions are presented once
the user has issued an initial query; see Fig. 1. These query suggestions come in two
flavors: query completions and query refinements. The difference is that the former are
prefixed by the initial query, while the latter are not. It is an open question whether a
unified method can produce suggestions in both flavors, or rather specialized models
are required. The best published work on task-based query suggestions, that we know
of, is by Garigliotti and Balog [4], who use a probabilistic generative model to combine keyphrase-based suggestions extracted from multiple information sources. Nevertheless, they rely heavily on Google’s query suggestion service. Thus, another main
challenge in our work is to solve this task without relying on suggestions provided by a
major web search engine (and possibly even without using a query log).
Following the pipeline architecture widely adopted in general query suggestion systems [7, 12], we propose a two-step approach consisting of suggestion generation and
2
Heng Ding, Shuo Zhang, Darı́o Garigliotti, and Krisztian Balog
choose bathroom
Search
choose bathroom brass
choose bathroom cabinets
choose bathroom colors
choose bathroom warmers
choose bathroom lighting
(a) query completion
living in india
Search
cost of living in india
american expats in india
indian classical music
india tourism
India Live TV
(b) query refinement
Fig. 1. Examples of query suggestions to support task-based search.
suggestion ranking steps. In this paper, we focus exclusively on the first component.
Our aim is to generate sufficiently many high-quality query suggestion candidates. The
subsequent ranking step will then produce the final ordering of suggestions by reranking these candidates (and ensuring their diversity with respect to the possible subtasks).
The first research question we address is: Can existing query suggestion methods generate high-quality query suggestions for task-based search? Specifically, we employ
the popular suffix [7], neural language model [10], and sequence-to-sequence [12] approaches to generate candidate suggestions. The second research question we ask is:
What are useful information sources for each method? We are particularly interested
in finding out how a task-oriented knowledge base (Know-How [9]) and a community
question answering site (WikiAnswers [3]) fare against using a query log (AOL [11]).
We find that the sequence-to-sequence approach performs best among the tested three
methods. As for data sources, we observe that, as expected, the query log is the highest
performing one among all. Nevertheless, the other two also provide valuable suggestion candidates that cannot be generated from the query log. Overall, we find that all
method-source configurations contribute unique suggestions, and thus it is beneficial to
combine them.
2
Query Suggestion Generation
Given a task-related initial query, q0 , we aim to generate a list of query suggestions
that cover all the possible subtasks related to the task the user is trying to achieve. For
a given suggestion q, let P (q|q0 ) denote the probability of that suggestion. Below, we
present three methods from the literature. The first two methods are specialized only in
producing query completions, while the third one is able to handle both query completions and refinements. Due to space constraints, only brief descriptions are given; we
refer to the respective publications for further details.
2.1
Popular Suffix Model
The popular suffix model [7] generates suggestions using frequently observed suffixes
mined from a query log. The method generates a suggestion q by extending the input
query q0 with a popular suffix s, i.e., q = q0 ⊕ s, where ⊕ denotes the concatenation
operator. The query likelihood is based on the popularity of suffix s: P (q|q0 ) = pop(s),
where pop(s) denotes the relative frequency of s occurring in the query log.
Generating High-Quality Query Suggestion Candidates for Task-Based Search
2.2
3
Neural Language Model
Neural language models (NLMs) can be used for generating query suggestions [10].
Suggestion q is created by extending the input query q0 character by character: q =
q0 ⊕ s = (c1 , . . . , cn , cn+1 , . . . , cm ), where c1 , . . . , cn are the characters of q0 , and
s = (cn+1 , . . . , cm ) are characters generated by the neural model. Given a sequence of
previous characters c = (c1 , . . . , ci ), the model generates the next character (i ≥ n)
according to: P (ci+1 |c) = softmax (hi ), where the hidden state vector at time i is
computed using hi = f (xi , hi−1 ). Here, f denotes a special unit, e.g., a long short-term
memory (LSTM) [5]; xi is the vector representation of the ith character of suggestion
q and is taken to be xi = σ(ci ), where σ denotes a mapping function from a character
to its vector representation. Finally, the query likelihood is estimated according to:
P (q|q0 ) =
m−1
Y
P (cj+1 |c1 , . . . , cj ).
j=n
Our implementation uses a network of 512 hidden units. We initialize the word-embedded
vector with the pre-trained vector from Bing queries.3 Beam search width is set to 30.
2.3
Sequence to Sequence Model
The sequence-to-sequence model (Seq2Seq) [6] aims to directly model the conditional
0
|w1 , . . . , wn ) of translating a source sequence (w1 , . . . , wn )
probability P (w10 , . . . , wm
0
0
). Thus, it lends itself naturally to implement our query
to a target sequence (w1 , . . . , wm
suggestion task using Seq2Seq, by letting the initial query be the source sequence q0 =
0
(w1 , . . . , wn ) and the suggestion be the target sequence q = (w10 , . . . , wm
). Typically,
a Seq2Seq model consists of two main components: an encoder and a decoder.
The encoder is a recurrent neural network (RNN) to compute a context vector representation c for the original query q0 . The hidden state vector of the encoder RNN at
time i ∈ [1..n] is given by: hi = f (wi , hi−1 ), where wi is the ith word of the input
query q0 , and f is a special unit (LSTM). The context vector representation is updated
by c = φ(h1 , h2 , . . . , hn ), where φ is an operation choosing the last state hn .
The decoder is another RNN to decompress the context vector c and output the
0
), through a conditional language model. The hidden state
suggestion, q = (w10 , . . . , wm
0
0
0
vector of the decoder RNN at time i ∈ [1..m] is given by hi = f 0 (hi−1 , wi−1 , c), where
0
wi is the ith word of the suggestion q, and f 0 is a special unit (LSTM). The language
0
0
0
0
0
model is given by: P (wi |w1 , . . . , wi−1 , q0 ) = g(hi , wi−1 , c), where g is a softmax
classifier. Finally, the Seq2Seq model estimates the suggestion likelihood according to:
P (q|q0 ) =
m−1
Y
0
P (wj+1
|w10 , . . . , wj0 , q0 ) .
j=1
We use a bidirectional GRU unit with size 100 for encoder RNNs, and a GRU unit with
size 200 for decoder RNNs. We employ an Adam optimizer with an initial learning rate
of 10−4 and a dropout rate of 0.5. Beam search width is set to 100.
3
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=52597
4
Heng Ding, Shuo Zhang, Darı́o Garigliotti, and Krisztian Balog
3
Data Sources
We consider three independent information sources. For the PopSuffix and NLM methods, we need a collection of short texts, C. For Seq2Seq, we need pairs of questionsuggestion pairs, hQ, Si.
– AOL query log [11]: a large query log that includes queries along with anonymous
user identity and timestamp. We extract all queries from the log as C. We detect sessions (each session including multiple queries) using the same criterion as in [12].
Then, we pair queries in the same session to obtain hQ, Si, where Q denotes a set
of queries and S are suggestions paired against Q. In order to obtain more pairs,
we extract all proper prefixes from the query, and pair them together. For example,
given a query “make a pancake”, we can construct two pairs h “make”, “make a
pancake” i and h “make a”, “make a pancake” i. This way, we end up with a total
of 112K prefix-query pairs.
– KnowHow [9]: a knowledge base that consists of two and half million entries. Each
triple hs, p, oi represents a fact about a human task, where the subject s denotes
a task (e.g., “make a pancake”) and the object o is a subtask (e.g., “prepare the
mix”). We collect all subjects and objects as C, and take all (142K) subject-object
pairs to form hQ, Si. Additionally, prefixes from tasks (i.e., subjects and objects)
are extracted to get more pairs, the same way as it is done for the AOL query log.
– WikiAnswers [3]: a collection of questions scraped from WikiAnswers.com.4 We
detect task-related questions using a simple heuristic, namely, that a task-related
question often starts with question constructions “how do you” or “how to.” These
question constructions are removed from the questions to obtain C (e.g, “how to
change gmail password” → “change gmail password”). This source can only be
used for the PopSuffix and NLM methods, as it does not provide pairs for Seq2Seq.
4
Experiment
We design and conduct an experiment to answers our research questions. First, we collect a pool of candidate suggestions, by applying the methods on different sources. Second, we collect annotations for each of these suggestions via crowdsourcing. Finally,
we report and analyze the results.
4.1
Pool Construction
We consider all queries (100 in total) from the TREC 2015 and 2016 Tasks tracks [13,
14]. We combine the proposed methods (Sect. 2) with various information sources
(Sect. 3) for suggesting candidates. We shall write s-m to denote a particular configuration that uses method m with source s. In addition, we also include the suggestions
generated by (i) the keyphrase-based query suggestion system [4], and (ii) the Google
Query Suggestion Service (referred to as Google API for short. Two pools are constructed, one for query completions (QC) and one for query refinements (QR). The
pool depth is 20, that is, we consider (up to) the top-20 suggestions for each method.
4
http://www.answers.com/Q/
Generating High-Quality Query Suggestion Candidates for Task-Based Search
Method
QC
P@10 P@20 R
CR
QR
P@10 P@20
AOL-PopSuffix
KnowHow-PopSuffix
WikiAnswers-PopSuffix
AOL-NLM
KnowHow-NLM
WikiAnswers-NLM
AOL-Seq2Seq
KnowHow-Seq2Seq
0.257
0.195
0.181
0.256
0.166
0.163
0.283
0.158
0.245
0.170
0.167
0.241
0.147
0.121
0.181
0.111
0.168
0.102
0.101
0.170
0.108
0.088
0.156
0.079
0.168
0.256
0.333
0.474
0.575
0.650
0.765
0.813
0.043
0.206
0.031
0.148
Keyphrase-based [4]
Google API
0.321
0.267
0.239
0.134
0.130
0.078
-
0.575
0.289
0.504
0.145
5
Table 1. Precision for candidate suggestions generated by different configurations. For QC methods, we also report on recall (R) and cumulative recall (CR).
4.2
Crowdsourcing
Due to the fact that many of our candidate suggestions lack assessments in the TREC
ground truth (and thus are considered irrelevant), we obtain relevance assessments
for all suggestions via crowdsourcing. Specifically, we use the Crowdflower platform,
where a dynamic number of annotators (3-5) are asked to label each suggestion as relevant or non-relevant. A suggestion is relevant if it targets for some more specific aspect
of the original query, i.e., the suggestion must be related to the original query intent.
It does not have to be perfectly correct grammatically, as long as the intent behind is
clearly understandable. The final label is taken to be the majority vote among the assessors. A total of 12,790 QC and 9,608 QR suggestions are annotated, at the total expense
of 692$. Further details are available in the online appendix.5
4.3
Results and Analysis
Table 1 presents a comparison of methods in terms of precision at cutoff points 10 and
20 (P@10 and P@20). Overall, we find that our methods can generate high-quality
query suggestions for task-based search. Our best numbers are comparable to that of
the Google API. It should, however, be noted that the Google API can only generate a
limited number of suggestions for each query. The keyphrase-based method [4] is the
highest performing of all; it is expected, as it combines multiple information sources,
including suggestions from Google.
We find that the AOL query log is the best source for generating QC suggestions,
while KnowHow works well for QR. AOL-Seq2Seq performs poorly on QR; this is
because only 2% of all training instances in hQ, Si are QR pairs. For QC suggestions,
the performance of AOL-PopSuffix and AOL-NLM are close to that of the Google
API, while AOL-Seq2Seq even outperforms it. For QR suggestions, the performance
of AOL-Seq2Seq is close to that of the Google API in terms of P@20, but is lower
5
http://bit.ly/2BnSjhR
6
Heng Ding, Shuo Zhang, Darı́o Garigliotti, and Krisztian Balog
on P@10. In general, our system is able to produce more suggestions than what the
(public) Google API provides.
Additionally, we also evaluate the recall of each QC method, using all relevant suggestions found as our recall base. We further report on cumulative recall, i.e., for line i
of Table 1 it is the recall of methods from lines 1..i combined together. We observe that
each configuration brings a considerable improvement to cumulative recall. This shows
that they generate unique query suggestions. For example, given the query “choose
bathroom,” our system generates unique query suggestions from different methods and
sources, e.g., “choose bathroom marks” (WikiAnswers-NLM), “choose bathroom supply” (AOL-NLM), “choose bathroom for your children” (KnowHow-NLM), “choose
bathroom grout” and “choose bathroom appliances” (KnowHow-Seq2Seq), which are
beyond what the Google API and the keyphrase-based system [4] provide. Therefore it
is beneficial to combine suggestions from multiple configurations for further reranking.
5
Conclusions
We have addressed the task of generating query suggestions that can assist users in
completing their tasks. We have focused on the first component of a two-step pipeline,
dedicated to creating suggestion candidates. For this, we have considered several methods and multiple information sources. We have based our evaluation on the TREC Tasks
track, and collected a large number of annotations via crowdsourcing. Our results have
shown that we are able to generate high-quality suggestion candidates. We have further
observed that the different methods and information sources lead to distinct candidates.
As our next step, we will focus on the second component of the pipeline, namely,
suggestions ranking. As part of this component, we also plan to address the specific
issue of subtasks coverage, i.e., improving the diversity of query suggestions.
Bibliography
[1] S. Bhatia, D. Majumdar, and P. Mitra. Query suggestions in the absence of query logs. In Proc. of SIGIR ’11, pages
795–804, 2011.
[2] F. Cai and M. de Rijke. A Survey of Query Auto Completion in Information Retrieval. Now Publishers Inc., Hanover,
MA, USA, 2016.
[3] A. Fader, L. Zettlemoyer, and O. Etzioni. Open Question Answering Over Curated and Extracted Knowledge Bases.
In Proc. of KDD ’14, 2014.
[4] D. Garigliotti and K. Balog. Generating query suggestions to support task-based search. In Proc. of SIGIR ’17, pages
1153–1156, 2017.
[5] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput., 9:1735–1780, 1997.
[6] M. Luong, H. Pham, and C. D. Manning. Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation, 2015.
[7] B. Mitra and N. Craswell. Query auto-completion for rare prefixes. In Proc. of CIKM ’15, pages 1755–1758, 2015.
[8] U. Ozertem, O. Chapelle, P. Donmez, and E. Velipasaoglu. Learning to suggest: A machine learning framework for
ranking query suggestions. In Proc. of SIGIR ’ 12, pages 25–34, 2012.
[9] P. Pareti, B. Testu, R. Ichise, E. Klein, and A. Barker. Integrating Know-How into the Linked Data Cloud, 2016.
[10] D. H. Park and R. Chiba. A neural language model for query auto-completion. In Proc. of SIGIR ’17, pages 1189–1192,
2017.
[11] G. Pass, A. Chowdhury, and C. Torgeson. A picture of search. In Proc. of InfoScale ’06, 2006.
[12] A. Sordoni, Y. Bengio, H. Vahabi, C. Lioma, J. Grue Simonsen, and J.-Y. Nie. A hierarchical recurrent encoder-decoder
for generative context-aware query suggestion. In Proc. of CIKM ’15, pages 553–562, 2015.
[13] M. Verma, E. Kanoulas, E. Yilmaz, R. Mehrotra, B. Carterette, N. Craswell, and P. Bailey. Overview of the TREC
tasks track 2016. In Proc. of TREC ’16, 2016.
[14] E. Yilmaz, M. Verma, R. Mehrotra, E. Kanoulas, B. Carterette, and N. Craswell. Overview of the TREC 2015 tasks
track. In Proc. of TREC ’15, 2015.
| 2cs.AI
|
1
Hybrid Urban Navigation for Smart
Cities
arXiv:1705.01516v1 [cs.SY] 3 May 2017
Oisı́n Moran*, Robert Gilmore*, Rodrigo Ordóñez-Hurtado and
Robert Shorten
Abstract
This paper proposes a design for a hybrid, city-wide urban navigation system for
moving agents demanding dedicated assistance. The hybrid system combines GPS and
vehicle-to-vehicle communication from an ad-hoc network of parked cars, and RFID
from fixed infrastructure –such as smart traffic lights– to enable a safely navigable
city. Applications for such a system include high-speed drone navigation and directing
visually impaired pedestrians.
I.
I NTRODUCTION
Driven by increasing urban populations, ageing citizens, and an ever increasing
need to make better use of existing resources, the smart city agenda has become
one of the most defining research paradigms of recent times. At the heart of
this research agenda is the need for services that require precise localisation and
rapid navigation. Examples of such services include drones to assist emergency
This work was partially supported by Science Foundation Ireland grant 11/PI/1177.
*Joint first authors.
O. Moran, R. Gilmore, R. Ordóñez-Hurtado and R. Shorten are with University College
Dublin, School of Electrical, Electronic and Communications Engineering, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected].
2
response units, and providing assistance to citizens with special needs. Thus, it
is very likely that locating, controlling and feedback will be key enablers for a
plethora of future city services.
Despite the obvious need for such services, their realisation is not without
significant challenges. Many services that we wish to develop require precise
and rapid navigation (drones to support emergency response) but should function
even in the partial absence of power or sensor coverage, and at the same time be
non-invasive and respect the privacy concerns of modern society.
Current navigation systems rely heavily on Global Navigation Satellite Systems
(GNSSs) such as GPS and GLONASS, despite the fact that in urban environments
GNSSs’ signals are in general inaccurate. A consequence of such inaccuracies is
increased power consumption (drifting around desired paths or waypoints will
result in longer times to successfully complete a journey). As a result, drone
navigation in urban scenarios tends to be vision-based, which is seen by many as
a major privacy concern. Thus the objective of this paper is to propose a viable
alternative to vision based systems that addresses some of these drawbacks.
Combining multiple types of sensing could provide the accuracy needed for
dedicated autonomous navigation in cities, this paper focuses on creating such a
system. As it would be virtually impossible (or at least impractical) to instrument
an entire city with battery-powered devices using traditional infrastructure, we
propose merging conventional and non-conventional approaches to create a system
that is a hybrid of high and low power sensing devices, and a hybrid of high and
low precision positioning technologies. We argue that this type of system is the
key to enabling large-scale robust, accurate, and rapid localisation of moving
agents within a city. For this, we propose to use an Ultra Wide Band (UWB)
based system for the dense coverage of high power sensing, and propose to use a
passive (cheap and zero power on the agent side) Radio Frequency Identification
(RFID) based system for the sparser coverage of low power “last-mile” sensing.
3
The proposed hybrid system of wireless devices could be created by installing
elements in the current city environment by either taking advantage of current
infrastructure or by adding new sensors to the fleet of vehicles involved in ad-hoc
networks. The latter approach, following [1] also enables the possibility of alternative monetization platforms for connected vehicles, with a car owner potentially
receiving micro-payments to participate in the network. Providing such a network
of collaborative technologies offers a broader coverage of an urban environment.
Such a dense and expansive network provides the possibility of creating accurate,
real-time sensory systems using multiple technologies to improve localisation,
which results in the creation of new, safe and robust navigation opportunities.
Using passive RFID tags, for example, has the benefit of ensuring an agent is not
restricted by the battery life of a sensor. This in effect produces a “Zero Power”
consuming sensor as the reflected radio waves in well-designed applications are
enough to give adequate localisation in the event of a loss of power, representing
a great advantage over traditional applications. In addition to this, this paper also
investigates the viability of using a new style of static but flexible infrastructure,
namely ad-hoc networks of parked cars, and how the potential services they
provide may be able to support a multi-technology sensory system for localisation
and navigation.
In summary, we aim to make possible rapid urban navigation for specialised
moving agents, such as drones for emergency response and priority delivery or
fully autonomous vehicles, by the adoption of a hybrid tracking/localisation system which enables wider coverage than conventional systems and a contingency
method in cases of power shortages on the agent side. The efficacy of the proposed
system is demonstrated by means of two important use-cases: (i) rapid drone
navigation in an urban environment; and (ii) the development of a smart traffic
light system to assist citizens with special needs.
4
II.
E NABLING T ECHNOLOGIES
This paper investigates a number of technologies that could collect the data required to localise and track moving agents for control purposes. The infrastructure
in which such technologies could be implemented, and the motivation for such
a system, derive in part from the idea of a fluid infrastructure – a system that
can provide complete coverage from permanently fixed and temporarily stationary
network nodes (road side units and parked cars respectively). This system would
provide the opportunity to instrument a city and localise an agent at virtually
every point of an agent’s traversal through an urban environment.
The road side units could be adorned with RFID technology to allow “Zero
Power” sensing in critical locations, while UWB technology could be implemented as part of a new fluid infrastructure utilising parked cars. The system and
technologies are described in depth in the following section.
A. Parked Cars as Infrastructure
Cars are parked for up to 95% of their lifespan [2] and practically serve no
purpose in such a state other than the economic drain of occupying valuable space.
However, as an underutilised network of dense sensors, these otherwise idle cars
lend themselves to new, creative and useful applications. For example they have
been proposed for a wide variety of dedicated tasks from finding missing keys
to detecting gas leaks [3]. Additionally, with an increasing number of sensors,
greater connectivity, and a move toward the car becoming a service platform,
these potential use cases will only increase.
Traditional infrastructure is generally expensive to set up and also to repair and
maintain. Using cars as infrastructure effectively eliminates these costs, as the fleet
is gradually refreshed. This system also has the extra benefit of upgrading itself
over time in contrast to the stagnation or degradation associated with traditional
infrastructure. The large number of cars in cities and their spatiotemporal stability
5
(staying in the same place for a long time) will also prove to be of great benefit.
The implementation in question here is the integration of UWB antenna nodes
within vehicles to act as data collectors and processing units for accurate position
estimation purposes.
B. Ultra Wide Band Technology
With the recent explosion in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV),
we have witnessed the legal landscape change (often not rapidly enough) in
response to the real and perceived threats of drones. With vision-based navigation
approaches proving so popular, the potential for the erosion of privacy becomes
a growing and valid concern, with the additional downside that the performance
of vision-based approaches rapidly deteriorates under poor weather conditions.
For applications where the end goal is not necessarily itself a visual task (such as
delivering a package), and where privacy issues may be of great concern, it would
be helpful to have a precise and rapid approach to navigation that is not dependent
on the availability of a camera or other vision sensors. Even in cases requiring
visual feedback, such as a fire station wishing to ascertain the existence or severity
of a fire, having a system capable of navigating to the intended location without
the need for a trained operator would save precious time for the firefighters who
would now only need to be present for the final stage.
Currently, the closest option available to a precise and rapid non-vision-based
approach would be the use of GPS which is not without its own technical drawbacks. A number of factors such as satellite position, signal attenuation, and clocking errors cause typical GPS applications to experience positioning errors of up to
30 m on average, while the advanced version DGPS still yields an average error of
5 m to 10 m in a variety of environments [4]. These positioning errors, specially
those from conventional GPS, cannot be neglected in comparison with the average
dimension of a drone (tens of centimeters). As with any traditional GNSS system,
6
the accuracy of GPS can also be greatly affected by atmospheric/environmental
conditions, shadowing by buildings, and multipath propagation which is especially
problematic in dense urban environments [5], [1]. While there exist different
demonstrations of GPS-only (i.e. non-cooperative) approaches for drone navigation, such as [6], these are all invariably done in favourable conditions such as
in open fields with no tall buildings. As any inaccuracies in position estimation
convert directly to speed reductions for waypoint tracking tasks, any increase in
accuracy is highly desirable for time-critical applications. For emergency applications such as the defibrillator drone designed by Alec Momont [7], these time
savings could make all the difference for a victim of an out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest where every minute that passes without treatment (CPR, defibrillatory shock,
or definitive care) decreases his or her survival rate by around 5.5% [8].
Our proposed system will thus attempt to solve both challenging issues: navigation speed and privacy. It will do so by using stationary cars as anchor (reference)
nodes in a cooperative positioning approach. The cars will average out measurements of their GPS location, thereby reducing the error in their estimation of their
location, and will only be added to the network after they have been stationary for
a sufficient period of time (decided by a suitable performance index). Involved cars
and the drone are required to be equipped with UWB-based systems to accurately
estimate the distances between them and cooperatively localize the drone. In this
paper we use UWB as a means to emulate current V2V communication systems
based on Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC), but a UWB module
could be easily added to the growing sensory array found in cars. Thus, as there is
no imaging equipment involved in this approach, then no privacy concerns arise.
However, UWB-based systems depend on the availability of local power, so
there is a gap in the system when power shortages occur in the host agent (i.e.
UWB-based system is turned off due to the risk of a low battery level). In addition,
as the density of cars in a city varies over space and time, there also exists
7
a possibility that the network of parked cars may not always be sufficient to
support such a localisation system. From a business district which may become
car-sparse at night, to a pedestrian crossing where there may be no parking spaces
nearby, holes may arise in the otherwise connected system. A system without a
fail-safe mechanism to allow, for example, a visually impaired person to cross a
pedestrian crossing under any circumstance would be neither robust nor safe. We
thus propose that a viable method to fill these gaps and thereby make the system
more robust, must rely on “Zero Power” technology such as that found in RFID
systems.
C. RFID Technology
RFID systems are now an ever present part of modern life (generally hidden
from sight), with applications that range from collecting tolls and paying bills to
gaining access to buildings [9]. In general, the traditional way of using RFID system is purely for identification purposes; however, by creating solutions that make
use of different parameters, we find they are capable of much more. One such
parameter that we will investigate in particular is the Received Signal Strength
Indicator (RSSI) of a signal.
For the case of urban navigation, we want to be able to distinguish the RSSI
values from different tags to estimate the distances to them, and then to work
towards the goal of implementing control systems based on that information.
Despite the fact that the RSSI readings are generally noisy, some tactics can be
employed to improve/augment the quality of the collected signals, and thus ensure
that the information found is trustworthy and distinguishable enough to create a
robustly controlled feedback system. Some relevant aspects when using RFID
systems are the technical issues when working under Non Line of Sight (NLOS)
scenarios, this is, when there are obstructions between the tag and the receiver,
either a varying or stationary obstruction. This paper does not investigate how to
8
alleviate the concern of moving obstacles such as other road users (e.g., cars or
people); however, there is already other research in this area (which can be further
incorporated into our proposed approach). This paper focuses on applications in
which RFID technology will not be affected by NLOS environments. In general,
the environment will have a great impact on the measured RSSI values, however,
with a suitable initial setup this issue can be alleviated.
Deploying RFID antennas capable of producing RF signals with sufficient
power to produce identifiable backscattered signals at critical locations (e.g., traffic
lights, uncontrolled intersections) is where this technology most clearly shows its
benefits. At these points, both RFID and UWB could be used collaboratively to
provide more accurate estimations of an agent’s location. However, significantly
at these critical locations, RFID could be used alone to determine the location and
orientation of an agent in the event of a contingency related to power availability
on the agent’s side. Passive RFID tags allow for “Zero Power” sensing on the
agent’s side, which is of huge potential benefit as it alleviates the dangers of loss
of power in areas where safety is of utmost concern (pedestrian direction along
a pedestrian crossing) or at the end point of a journey (drone navigation).
III.
P ROPOSED I MPLEMENTATION
Using both of the above technologies, namely UWB and RFID, integrated with
parked cars as infrastructure, brings the potential to virtually cover a city with
enough units/sensors to make it fully navigable using a cooperative approach, and
with a contingency strategy for critical scenarios. A critical location is, in general,
a location at which agents are most at risk, and where the risk of losing signal
or battery power would have the greatest effect. A pedestrian crossing is a good
example of such a location. Crossing, already a dangerous activity, has been made
even more dangerous with the advent of “quiet cars” as more electric and hybrid
cars take to the roads. Thus, reading the user’s location using both UWB and
9
RFID technologies in conjunction could direct a user safely across a road.
Fig. 1.
Potential infrastructure for urban navigation: pedestrians (moving agents), UWB-based systems
(blue circles marked with A), RFID antennas (blue circles marked with B), and critical location (pedestrian
crossing).
Figure 1 illustrates a use-case scenario in which a visually impaired road user (a
blind pedestrian) is directed using the UWB-based system for the largest section
of their journey and then using both RFID and UWB, or RFID alone in critical
zones. In the diagram, the cars are stationary (i.e. parked) and house UWB
transceivers while the traffic light system would house the RFID antenna, thus
adding functionality to existing infrastructure. In the case of battery power loss, a
visually impaired road user will be safe when on the pavement and can continue
their journey with confidence as they can re-orient themselves with reference to
a known point – the edge of the pavement. However, at the critical and most
dangerous point (the road crossing), no such reference is available. This is where
the RFID system could provide feedback to the road user without need for any
battery power on the agent’s side. Figure 2 visualises a system that could be of
interest to the implementation of package delivery using drones. Many companies
are investigating the feasibility of drone delivery systems and the approaches
discussed in this paper may be able to accurately control and position drones for
10
this use. Again, the UWB positioning would be used for large-scale movement
tracking, while RFID and UWB in conjunction could be used for more accurate
positioning and orientation for docking, to ensure safe and timely delivery of
products. Again, parked cars can be used as UWB anchors and RFID antennas
could be installed like a traditional letterbox. RFID is useful in this use-case
application for its potential even to control the orientation of the drone. Thus, in
the case of a battery level at potentially critical level, then the UWB-based system
could be turned off and the “Zero Power” RFID-based sensing system would be
hugely beneficial to complete an agent’s journey successfully.
Fig. 2. Potential infrastructure for drone delivery system: drone (moving agent), UWB-based systems (blue
circles marked with A), and RFID antennas (blue circles marked with B).
IV.
E XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS
A. Cooperative V2V navigation.
Consistent indoor waypoint tracking has been successfully achieved using UWBbased Pozyx1 positioning system.The drone was able to navigate to within a 25 cm
1
https://www.pozyx.io/
11
radius of each waypoint in a list, as demonstrated in Figure 3 and Movie A in
Section V.
4000
y (mm)
3000
2000
1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
x (mm)
Fig. 3. Position of drone during indoor waypoint navigation task as estimated by the Pozyx system. Position
of drone is shown in blue and waypoints of radius 25 cm are shown in grey.
Concerning tests in an urban-like scenario, we first established a GPS-only
system as a benchmark for comparison reasons with respect to our cooperative
proposed approach. The used location (periphery of UCD’s Science Centre) was
chosen to be representative of an urban environment (see Figure 4) and as such
was very close to tall buildings. As the GPS readings at this location (solid line
in Figure 4)) contain positioning errors of high magnitude, the GPS-only system
was unworkable in such an scenario, which provides a stronger justification to the
12
use of our approach. So far, in the steps toward a full proof of concept, we used
the whole set of collected GPS data (4 hours of latitude, longitude, and HDOP
readings, collected every 10 s) to obtain an improved position estimation by means
of a weighted average described in [1]. Thus, every sample i is weighted by the
factor λi given by
HDOPi−2
λi = PN
−2
j=1 HDOPj
to finally obtain the average value represented with a blue circle in Figure 4,
which is within a proximity of 2 m from the real location (yellow star). With
these results, our next step will be the validation of the waypoint tracking in the
outdoor scenario using the hybrid (GPS+UWB) positioning system, where the
relative positioning can be obtained with high accuracy using the UWB anchors,
and then the absolute position is estimated by merging the information from the
weighted average of GPS positions. Such a validation process is currently being
prepared.
B. RFID localisation using RSSI measurements
Characterising the relationship between RSSI readings and distance/orientation
of moving agents carrying RFID tags is of utmost importance; this is to provide
evidence that the backscattered RF signals are reliable and accurate enough to
be used in navigational control systems. As mentioned previously, there are some
limitations in the use of RFID technology, one of which being that the environment
in which it is operated greatly impacts the readings obtained from tags. We have
investigated this experimentally with a Parrot AR.Drone 2.0 covered by few tags,
and the resulting curves displayed together in Figure 5. The differences in the
returned RSSI values can be taken into account before making a decision in any
control system, or the system could be constructed in a known location in which
the environment is suitable. Something to note is that applications in a smart city
13
Fig. 4.
GPS data (solid line) recorded every 10 s over 4 hours, versus weighted average (blue circle) and
true location (yellow star). Black areas correspond to tall buildings (UCD’s Science Centre, Belfield, Dublin
4, Ireland).
context will be more likely to involve outdoors environment where backscattering
and multipath effects of RF waves will not be of much concern. The locations
of such systems can be chosen to minimize dynamic changes in the environment,
such as elevated locations including the top of traffic lights and lamp posts.
Figure 5 shows the standard average over 20 s of RSSI readings per location,
resulting in over 100 readings per location. This test was undertaken in multiple
environments (enclosed/open) and operation modes (flying/held) to gain insight
on how the location of the controllable agent would affect the returned RSSI
values. For the enclosed laboratory, it is seen that for the first 2 m, the curve can
14
be characterised as a straight line, whereas at further distances it would be more
difficult to determine where the tag is located. There is a one-to-many relationship
caused by multipath effects in such an environment. This would not be the case
in an outdoor environment as proven by the straight line relationship seen in the
more open and unobstructed laboratory. Furthermore, it is useful to note that the
RSSI values are of larger magnitude in the open lab, which is likely due to the
reduction in multipath reflected return signals that would reduce the average value
over the experimental test period.
90
Enclosed Lab, Held
Enclosed Lab, Flying
85
Open Lab, Held
RSSI Value
Long Corridor, Held
80
75
70
65
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Distance (m)
Fig. 5. RSSI curves for a tag a placed on drone in different environments and operation modes. Each point
correspond to the standard average of over 100 reading collected over 20 s.
1) Distance Estimation: The results displayed in Figure 6 are for distance
estimation of a drone carrying multiple tags with respect to two RFID antennas.
The antennas were situated at either end of a straight line, with the tags on the
15
drone orientated perpendicularly with respect to the plane of the surface of both
antennas. It should be noted here that despite the fact that maximum/minimum
readings have a large variation the inter-quartile ranges are relatively small and
do not overlap. In this experiment the RFID tags were interrogated for 10 s per
data point which equated to no less than 80 returned RSSI values.
3
Distance (m)
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5m
1m
1.25m
1.5m
2m
Set of Distances Dataset
Fig. 6.
RSSI curve for tags attached to a drone at data points located in between 2 antennas, in an open
laboratory. Each data point was interrogated for 10 s, which resulted in over 80 values per data point.
Now that we can characterise the relationship between RSSI and distance, a
Java script was developed to record the RFID-based position estimations. The
information shown in Table I reveals that the system is accurate to within 13 cm,
which is relevant enough for the dimensions of the test drone (51.7 cm x 51.7 cm).
Figure 7 displays the information recorded during a straight line flight test, in
which a simple control system is implemented. A destination point was set and
16
TABLE I.
RFID- BASED POSITION ESTIMATION :
AVERAGED POSITIONING ERROR IN RECORDED
ESTIMATIONS
True Dist (m)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Avg Recorded Dist (m)
0.6023
1.0449
1.3011
1.4738
2.1338
Error (m)
-0.1023
-0.0449
-0.0511
0.0262
-0.1338
S.Deviation (m)
0.0489
0.0503
0.0422
0.0212
0.0622
the drone placed by the user at a point away from the destination. In this case,
the starting point was 0.8 m from the reference antenna, and the destination was
1.25 m from the reference antenna. The RFID system collected the RSSI values
and converted them to a distance; this estimation using RFID is shown in Figure
7. For comparison, the approximate ground truth was measured by the Pozyx
system. A link to a video of this in operation can be found in Section V.
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
Distance (m)
1.2
1
0.8
RFID Data
0.6
Pozxy Data
0.4
0.2
0
0
Fig. 7.
5
10
Time (seconds)
15
Location estimation from RFID system and Pozxy system: 0.8 m to 1.25 m.
20
17
2) Angle Estimation: For many applications, the orientation of an agent is
useful or even necessary. Investigations into how the comparison of multiple tags
positioned (at known locations) on one agent has been undertaken here. Emphasis
is placed on analysing the differences in returning RF signals, that when processed
could track orientation in real-time. The results prove that not only distance can be
accurately measured using RFID, but a relationship can be formed that converts
the differences in RSSI to corresponding angles. An example of this data collected
from 2 different tags on one side of the drone is shown in Figure 8, in which
an roughly linear relationship is observed. Furthermore, Table II shows that the
error between the true angle and the recorded angle using RFID technology is on
average less than 1.1 degrees over a time period of 5 s.
20
y = -0.3526x + 15.23
15
Difference in RSSI
10
5
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
-5
-10
-15
-20
Angle (Degrees)
Fig. 8.
RSSI curve for the difference between the average value from 2 tags affixed to one side of the
drone with 40 cm of separation.
18
When implemented in a control system, the drone could be rotated to any
orientation within the range: ± 45 degrees. However, it was noted that the accuracy
of the system seems to improve the closer the drone’s orientation was to zero
degrees (i.e. perpendicular to the antenna). Figure 9 displays the orientation as
recorded by the RFID reader and by the drone’s IMU. A link to a video of this
in operation can be found in Section V.
40
35
RFID Data
30
Drone Data
Angle (degrees)
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
0
Fig. 9.
20
40
60
Sample Number
80
Angle estimation from RFID system and drone’s accelerometer: +30 to 0 degrees.
3) Control Systems and Applications: With the information collected and proof
that there is enough accuracy to recognise both distance and angle, it is clear
that passive RFID tags can be used as zero power sensors in highly critical
areas, alleviating fears of loss of power. From this, ideas of personal and airborne
navigation through adding tags to moving agents are both feasible and accurate. A
19
TABLE II.
RFID- BASED ANGLE ESTIMATION :
AVERAGE ESTIMATION ERROR IN RECORDED
ESTIMATIONS
True Angle (◦ )
Avg Angle Found
(◦ )
Error (◦ )
S. Deviation
(◦ )
0
-30
30
-15
15
0.6570
-30.2382
30.7499
-16.0704
15.6625
-0.6570
0.2382
-0.7499
1.0704
-0.6625
1.1135
1.2762
1.0035
0.8030
0.6567
system has already been developed using the results found in this paper, in which
the tags alone can distinguish at which angle and position an agent is located, and
offer navigation assistance to direct that agent. As discussed above, we imagine
that this could be used to aid road crossing with auditory or vibratory feedback
given through a user’s smartphone or the traffic light system itself. We further
imagine that the sequence of traffic lights could be altered to ensure safety of the
pedestrian.
Using the difference in the RSSI values, it has been found that an agent can
be directed to a centre line between 2 antennas, and from there the agent can
be accurately maneuvered along such an straight line, as illustrated in Figure
10. Furthermore, using RSSI to estimate the distance of an agent from an antenna accurately in a straight line means that an agent can be controlled and
moved/directed to a set location. This has been achieved in airborne tests using
a Parrot AR Drone 2.0 and AutoFlight
V.
2
drone control software.
D EMONSTRATIONS
We have prepared a set of movies to demonstrate the key salient points of our
results.
Movie A (Indoor Waypoint Navigation): Video demonstrating indoor waypoint tracking to a tolerance of 25 cm. Position is estimated by using 4 Pozyx
2
https://electronics.kitchen/autoflight
20
Fig. 10.
Example of RFID setup for feedback control of a moving agent.
anchors (UWB) to localize one tag located on the drone.
Link: https://youtu.be/pnRgJtCT_Uw
Movie B (Location Control of Drone using RFID): Video demonstrating
control of drone’s location in one dimension to a tolerance of 10 cm, using RSSI
readings from two tags, from two antennas.
Link: https://youtu.be/cm7VHIjtH_U
Movie C (Orientation Control of Drone using RFID): Video demonstrating
control of drone’s orientation to a tolerance of 3 degrees, using RSSI readings
from two tags, from one antenna.
Link: https://youtu.be/bQjGTuhpIBQ
VI.
C ONCLUSIONS
This paper explores the potential to use a number of technologies in a new
and complementary way, to redefine how we look at possible infrastructures and
implementations to provide city-wide navigation and control. There is huge scope
for extension to this work, in refinement and in developing practical working
systems that could be put into operation in minimal time. Using both UWB and
RFID technologies, allows for a robust and reliable system that reduces the risk
in the case of low battery or power shortages situations, maintaining safety at all
times. Overall the work completed here has great potential for improving the daily
21
lives of commuters and residents through the implementation of smart services
within the city of the future.
R EFERENCES
[1]
R. H. Ordonez-Hurtado, E. Crisostomi, and R. N. Shorten, “An assessment on the use of stationary
vehicles to support cooperative positioning systems,” International Journal of Control, 2017. In press.
[2]
C. Sommer, D. Eckhoff, and F. Dressler, “IVC in cities: Signal attenuation by buildings and how parked
cars can improve the situation,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 13, pp. 1733–1745,
August 2014.
[3]
S. Zhuk, T. Tchrakian, S. Moore, R. Ordonez-Hurtado, and R. Shorten, “On source-term parameter
estimation for linear advection-diffusion equations with uncertain coefficients,” SIAM Journal on
Scientific Computing, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. A2334–A2356, 2016.
[4]
W.-H. Kuo and S.-H. Fang, “The impact of GPS positioning errors on the hop distance in vehicular adhoc
networks (VANETs),” in International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications
(ICNC), 2013.
[5]
R. H. Ordonez-Hurtado and R. N. Shorten, “Using stationary vehicles to enhance cooperative positioning
in vehicular ad-hoc networks,” in 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo
(ICCVE), pp. 867–868, Nov 2014.
[6]
L. V. Santana, A. S. Brandão, and M. Sarcinelli-Filho, “Outdoor waypoint navigation with the AR.Drone
quadrotor,” in International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2015.
[7]
A. Moment, “Dronesforgood.” http://www.alecmomont.com/projects/dronesforgood/. Not to be confused
with The UAE Drones for Good Award.
[8]
M. P. Larsen, M. S. Eisenberg, R. O. Cummins, and A. P. Hallstrom, “Predicting survival from out-ofhospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model.” Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1993.
[9]
J. Landt, “The history of RFID,” IEEE Potentials, vol. 24, pp. 8–11, Oct. 2005.
| 3cs.SY
|
arXiv:0802.0914v1 [q-bio.PE] 7 Feb 2008
Shrinkage Effect in Ancestral Maximum
Likelihood
Elchanan Mossel∗
Sebastien Roch†
Mike Steel ‡
December 17, 2017
Abstract
Ancestral maximum likelihood (AML) is a method that simultaneously
reconstructs a phylogenetic tree and ancestral sequences from extant data
(sequences at the leaves). The tree and ancestral sequences maximize the
probability of observing the given data under a Markov model of sequence
evolution, in which branch lengths are also optimized but constrained to
take the same value on any edge across all sequence sites. AML differs
from the more usual form of maximum likelihood (ML) in phylogenetics
because ML averages over all possible ancestral sequences. ML has long
been know to be statistically consistent – that is, it converges on the correct
tree with probability approaching 1 as the sequence length grows. However,
the statistical consistency of AML has not been formally determined, despite
informal remarks in a literature that dates back 20 years. In this short note
we prove a general result that implies that AML is statistically inconsistent.
In particular we show that AML can ‘shrink’ short edges in a tree, resulting
in a tree that has no internal resolution as the sequence length grows. Our
results apply to any number of taxa.
∗
Email: [email protected]. Depts. of Statistics and Computer Science, U.C. Berkeley.
Supported by an Alfred Sloan fellowship in Mathematics, by NSF grants DMS-0528488, DMS0548249 (CAREER), and by DOD ONR grant N0014-07-1-05-06.
†
Email: [email protected]. Theory Group, Microsoft Research.
‡
Email: [email protected]. Biomathematics Research Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
1
1 Introduction
Markov models of site substitution in DNA are the basis for most methods for
inferring phylogenies (evolutionary trees) from aligned sequence data. The usual
approach is maximum likelihood (ML) which seeks the tree and branch lengths
that maximizes the probability of generating the observed data under a Markov
process. In the simplest setting one assumes that sites evolve independently and
identically, and that the extant sequences (data) label the leaves of the tree – for
background on phylogenetics and ML see [9]. ML is computational complicated,
and even the problem of finding the optimal branch lengths exactly on a fixed
tree has unknown complexity. In ML one considers all possible ancestral sequences that could have existed within the tree, and averages each such ‘scenario’
by its probability. An alternative is to simply consider a single choice of ancestral
sequences that has the highest probability – this is a variant of ML that was introduced in 1987 by Barry and Hartigan [3] under the name ‘most parsimonious
likelihood’, and which later was renamed ancestral maximum likelihood (AML)
(see e.g. [1]). The computational complexity of AML is slightly easier than ML,
in that given the tree and either the optimal branch lengths or the optimal ancestral
sequences, the other ‘unknown’ (ancestral sequences or branch length) is readily
determined (see eg. [2]). The method can be viewed as being, in some sense,
intermediate between ML and a primitive cladistic method, maximum parsimony
(MP), which seeks the tree and ancestral sequences that minimizes the total number of sites substitutions required to describe the data. Indeed, AML would select
the same trees as MP if one further constrained AML so that each edge had the
same branch length, as shown in [10].
The recent interest in AML has sprung from computational complexity considerations. Firstly, AML seemed to provide a promising route by which to show
that the problem of reconstructing an ML tree from sequences is NP-hard [1, 6]. It
turned out that the NP-hardness of ML can be established directly, without invoking AML [15], however the relative computational simplicity of AML over ML
suggests it may provide an alternative strategy for reconstructing large trees.
Nevertheless, it is important to know whether the desirable statistical properties of ML carry over to methods such as AML. In particular ML has long been
known to be statistically consistent as a way of estimating tree topologies – that
is, as the sequence length grows, the probability that ML will reconstruct the tree
that generated the sequences tends to 1. It has also been known (since 1978) that
more primitive methods, such as MP, can be statistically inconsistent [8].
However the statistical consistency of AML is unclear, since the standard
2
Wald-style conditions required to prove consistency (in particular a fixed parameter space that does not grow with the size of the data) does not apply. Thus, one
may suspect that AML might be inconsistent, and indeed remarks in the literature
have suggested this could be the case (see [4], [11]). However the absence of a sufficient condition to prove consistency does not constitute proof of inconsistency,
and the purpose of this short note is to formally show that AML is statistically
inconsistent. More precisely we show that AML tends to ‘shrink’ short edges in a
tree, and this can result in the collapse of the interior edges (and any short pendant
edges) to produce a star tree.
The results in this paper rely on probability arguments, based on expansions
of the entropy function, and combinatorial properties of minimal sets of edges that
separate each pair of leaves in a tree.
1.1 Problem Statement
CFN model We define [n] = {0, . . . , n − 1} and we deal with the CavenderFarris-Neyman (CFN) model [5, 7, 13].
Definition 1 (CFN model) We are given a tree T = (V, E) on n leaves labelled
[n] and an assignment of edge probabilities p : E → (0, 1/2). A realization of
the model is obtained as follows: choose any vertex as a root; pick a state for the
root uniformly at random in {0, 1}; moving away from the root, each edge e flips
the state of its ancestor with probability pe . We denote by X the (random) state at
the leaves obtained in this manner. We write X ∼ CFN(T, p).
Ancestral Maximum Likelihood We consider two equivalent formulations of
the Ancestral Maximum Likelihood problem. The second version is obtained by
setting
de
pe = ,
(1)
k
for all e in the first version [1].
Definition 2 (AML, Version 1) The Ancestral Maximum Likelihood (AML) problem can be stated as follows. Given a set of n binary sequences of length k, find
a tree T = (V, E) on n leaves, an assignment p : E → [0, 1/2] of edge probabilities, and an assignment of sequences λ : V → {0, 1}k to the vertices such
that:
1. The sequences at the leaves under λ are exactly the sequences from S;
3
2. The quantity
L(T, p | λ) = − log2
Y
pde e (1 − pe )k−de
e∈E
is minimized, where
!
,
du,v = kλu − λv k1 .
Definition 3 (AML, Version 2 [1]) The Ancestral Maximum Likelihood (AML)
problem can alternatively be stated as follows. Given a set of n binary sequences
of length k, find a tree T on n leaves and an assignment of sequences λ : V →
{0, 1}k to the vertices such that:
1. The sequences at the leaves under λ are exactly the sequences from S;
2. The quantity
H(T | λ) =
X
H
e∈E
de
k
,
is minimized, where recall that the entropy function is
H(p) = −p log2 p − (1 − p) log2 (1 − p),
for 0 ≤ p ≤ 1.
(k)
Consistency A phylogeny estimator Φ = {(Φn )n,k≥1} is a collection of mappings from sequences to trees, that is,
(k)
Φ(k)
n : Bn → Tn ,
(k)
where Bn is the set of all assignments of the form
Bn(k) = {µ | µ : [n] → {0, 1}k },
and Tn is the set of all trees on n leaves labelled by [n]. Let X = {X1 , X2 , . . .}
(k)
with Xj : [n] → {0, 1} for n ≥ 1. For all k ≥ 1, we denote by µ = µX the
(k)
assignment in Bn such that (µv )j = (Xj )v for all v ∈ [n] and j = 1, . . . , k.
Definition 4 (Consistency) A phylogeny estimator Φ is said to be (statistically)
consistent if for all n, all trees T = (V, E) ∈ Tn , and all edge probability assignments p : E → (0, 1/2), it holds that
(k)
Φ(k)
n (µX ) → T,
almost surely as k → +∞, where X = {X1 , X2 , . . .} with X1 , X2 , . . . independently generated by CFN(T, p).
4
1.2 Main Result
Let ΦAML be the AML phylogeny estimator for AML Version 1, where all edges
e with pe = 0 have been contracted and all edges e with pe = 1/2 have been
removed. (Break ties arbitrarily.)
Theorem 1 (AML Is Not Consistent) For all n ≥Q1 and each tree T = (V, E) ∈
Tn , there is a β > 0 and a shrinkage zone QT = e∈E Ie such that |Ie | > β for
all e and if p ∈ QT , ΦAML returns a star rooted at 0 in the limit k → +∞
on the dataset X = {X1 , . . . Xk } with X1 , . . . , Xk independently generated by
CFN(T, p).
The phenomenon described in Theorem 1 is illustrated in Fig. 1. We note that our
result does not imply the stronger statement that AML is “positively misleading”
since we can think of the rooted star as the correct tree T where several edges are
set to pe = 0. Note however that the solution is highly degenerate since the star
can be obtained in this way from any tree. In other words, in the shrinkage zone,
AML provides no information about the internal structure of the tree even with
infinitely long sequences.
0
θe > 1 − δ
0
θe ≤ ǫ
n−1
1
2
n
n−1
1
n
2
Figure 1: The shrinkage effect: For the tree on the left, AML will reconstruct the
star tree (right) from sufficiently long sequences
1.3 Organization
We begin with some preliminary remarks in Section 2. The proof of Theorem 1
can be found in Section 3.
5
2 Preliminaries
2.1 Solution Properties
(k)
Fixed Extension Let T ∈ Tn . For an assignment of sequences µ ∈ Bn and
1 ≤ j ≤ k, we call χ : [n] → {0, 1} with χu = (µu )j for all u ∈ [n] the j-th
character in µ. We write χ ∈ µ if there is j such that χ is the j-th character in µ.
We also denote by χ# the number of characters in µ equal to χ. An extension of
a character χ is a mapping χ̄ : V → {0, 1} such that χ̄v = χv for all v ∈ [n]. We
denote by V(χ) the set of all extensions of χ on T . Let f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] .
The mapping then defines an extension for all characters simultaneously by setting
(χ̄f )v = χv for all v ∈ [n] and (χ̄f )v = f (χ)v for all v ∈ V − [n]. We show next
that AML is in fact equivalent to finding such an f , which can significantly reduce
(k)
the size of the problem for large k. For a set of n binary sequences µ ∈ Bn and
a tree T = (V, E) ∈ Tn , we denote by µ̄f the extension of µ to V by applying f
as above to every character in µ.
(k)
Definition 5 (AML, Version 3) Given a set of n binary sequences µ ∈ Bn , find
a tree T ∈ Tn and a mapping f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] such that the quantity
X de
H(T | µ̄f ) =
H
,
k
e∈E
is minimized.
Proposition 1 (AML, Version 3) There is always a solution of AML Version 1
and 2 of the form λ = µ̄f for some f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] .
Proof: Note that
L(T, p | λ) = − log2
Y
pde e (1 − pe )k−de
e∈E
= −k
X
!
,
log2 (1 − pe ) −
e∈E
k
X
X
1{(λu )j 6= (λv )j } log2
j=1 (u,v)∈E
pe
.
1 − pe
For fixed p, since L “decomposes” in j, it is always possible to take the same
extension for each character appearing in µ without affecting optimality. Then,
we can choose the optimal p as in [1] to obtain the result.
6
Limit Problem Let T = (V, E) ∈ Tn . Assume as in Theorem 1 that we
are given a dataset X = {X1 , X2 , . . .} with X1 , X2 , . . . i.i.d. CFN(T, p). Fix
f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] . Let X ∼ CFN(T, p) and denote by Y = X̄f the
(k)
(k)
extension of X under f . Also, let µ̄X,f be the extension of µX under f . By the
(k)
Law of Large Numbers, as k → +∞, the quantity H(T | µ̄X,f ) converges almost
surely to
X
HX,T (f ) =
H(Ye ),
e∈E
where, for e = (u, v), Ye is the indicator that Yu 6= Yv , and H(Ye ) is the entropy
of Ye , that is,
H(Ye ) = H(P[Yu 6= Yv ]).
Note that, by Proposition 1, even as k → +∞ there are only a constant number of
mappings f to consider. We say that f is HX,T -optimal if f minimizes HX,T (f )
over all f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] . The minimum need not be unique.
Definition 6 (Expected AML) Given a random variable X taking values in {0, 1}[n],
find a tree T = (V, E) ∈ Tn and a mapping f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] such that
the quantity
X
HX,T (f ) =
H(Ye ),
e∈E
is minimized, where Y = X̄f .
By the previous remarks and (1), to prove Theorem 1 it suffices to show:
Theorem 2 (Optimal Assignment) Let T ′ = (V ′ , Q
E ′ ) ∈ Tn and let X ∼ CFN(T ′ , p).
Then there is a β > 0 and a shrinkage zone QT = e∈E Ie such that |Ie | > β for
all e and for all for all T = (V, E) ∈ Tn , the unique HX,T -optimal f : {0, 1}[n] →
{0, 1}V −[n] assigns to all internal nodes of V the value at leaf 0 under all characters, that is,
f (x) = (x0 , . . . , x0 ),
for all x ∈ {0, 1}[n].
2.2 Minimal Isolating Sets
Definition In preparation for our proof of Theorem 2, we will need the following
notion which is studied in [12].
7
Definition 7 (Isolating Set) Let T = (V, E) be a tree. A subset S of E is called
an isolating set for T if for any two leaves u, v there exists an edge e ∈ S on the
path connecting u and v.
The following result is proved in [12].
Proposition 2 (Minimal Isolating Set) The size of a minimal isolating set on an
n-leaf tree is n − 1.
We will also need:
Proposition 3 (One Leaf Per Component) Let T be a tree on n leaves and let
S be a minimal isolating set on T . Consider the forest F obtained from T by
removing all edges in S. Then, each component of F contains exactly one leaf of
T.
Proof: If a component of F contains two leaves, then these cannot be isolated
under S, a contradiction. On the other hand, if a component T ′ of F does not
contain a leaf, then every edge adjacent to T ′ in T is in fact in S. But then one can
remove one of these edges without losing the isolating property of S, contradicting
the minimality of S.
Minimally Isolating f Let T = (V, E) ∈ Tn and f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] .
We denote by Sf ⊆ E the set of edges e = (u, v) such that there is x ∈ {0, 1}[n]
with f (x)u 6= f (x)v .
Definition 8 (Minimally Isolating f ) We say that f is minimally isolating for T
if Sf is a minimal isolating set of T .
2.3 Random cluster parameterization
We will sometimes require a different (‘random cluster’) parameterization of the
CFN model. Let T ∈ Tn and p ∈ [0, 1]E . (Note that we allow pe in [0, 1].) We let
θe = 1 − 2pe ,
for all e ∈ E. The main property we will use is the following well-known identity.
For two leaves u, v in T , let PathT (u, v) be the set of edges on the path between
u and v.
8
Proposition 4 (Path Probability) Let T = (V, E) ∈ Tn and p ∈ [0, 1]E . Assume
X ∼ CFN(T, p). Let u, v be two leaves of T . Then we have
Y
1
P[Xu 6= Xv ] = 1 −
θe .
2
e∈PathT (u,v)
3 Proof
In this section, we prove Theorem 2 from which Theorem 1 follows. The proof
has two components:
1. [Reduction to Minimal Isolating Sets] We first show that for any random
variable X ∈ {0, 1}[n] close enough to uniform and any tree T ∈ Tn , the
HX,T -optimal f ’s are minimally isolating for T .
2. [Rooted Star is Optimal] Second, we show that if X above is CFN(T ′ , p)
for some T ′ ∈ Tn with pe ≈ 1/2 if e is adjacent to {1, . . . , n−1} and pe ≈ 0
otherwise, then for all T ∈ Tn the unique HX,T -optimal f assigns the value
at 0 to all internal nodes.
Throughout, n ≥ 1 is fixed.
3.1 Reduction to Minimal Isolating Sets
We prove the following:
Proposition 5 (Reduction to Minimal Isolating Sets) There exists ε > 0 (depending on n) such that the following hold. Let X be any random variable taking
values in {0, 1}[n] with H(X) ≥ n − ε and let T be any tree in Tn . If f is HX,T optimal, then f is minimally isolating for T .
Proof: We make a series of claims.
Claim 1 (Reduction to Uniform) For all δ > 0 there exists ε = ε(δ) > 0 such
that if X is a {0, 1}[n]-random variable with
H(X) ≥ n − ε,
and f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] then
|HX,T (f ) − HU,T (f )| ≤ δ,
9
(2)
where U is the uniform distribution on {0, 1}[n]. Therefore, it suffices to prove
Proposition 5 for those f that are HU,T -optimal.
Proof: The entropy of {0, 1}[n]-random variables is maximized uniquely at H(U) =
n. The first part of the result follows by continuity of H(X) and HX,T (f ) in the
distribution of X.
For the second part, take δ > 0 small enough such that for all f, f ′ , we have
HU,T (f ) > HU,T (f ′ ) =⇒ HU,T (f ) > HU,T (f ′ ) + 2δ.
(3)
(Recall that there are only finitely many f ’s for fixed n.) Take ε > 0 such that the
first part holds. Then it follows that if f is HX,T -optimal then it must be HU,T optimal. We argue by contradiction. Assume there are f , f ′ such that HX,T (f ) ≤
HX,T (f ′ ) but HU,T (f ) > HU,T (f ′ ). By (3), we have
HU,T (f ) > HU,T (f ′ ) + 2δ,
(4)
which implies HX,T (f ) > HX,T (f ′ ) by (2), a contradiction.
Claim 2 (Minimizer) If f is HU,T -optimal then HU,T (f ) = n − 1. Moreover,
denoting Y = Ūf we have that {Y0 , (Ye )e∈E } are mutually independent.
Proof:
Upper Bound We first show that there is f such that HU,T (f ) ≤ n − 1. Let S
be a minimal isolating set for T . Define f by letting f (x)u = f (x)v for all edges
(u, v) not in S. By Proposition 3, this uniquely defines f . Letting Y = Ūf it is
immediate to check that
X
X
HU,T (Y ) =
H(Ye ) =
H(Ye ) ≤ n − 1,
e∈E
e∈S
by Proposition 2.
Lower Bound
For any f : {0, 1}[n] → {0, 1}V −[n] with Y = Ūf , we have
n = H(U) = H({(Yv )v∈[n] }) = H({Y0, (Ye )e∈E })
X
X
≤ H(Y0 ) +
H(Ye ) ≤ 1 +
H(Ye ),
e∈E
e∈E
10
where we have used that {(Yv )v∈[n] } and {Y0, (Ye )e∈E } are deterministic functions
of each other. Furthermore, the first inequality holds to equality if and only if
{Y0 , (Ye )e∈E } are mutually independent.
We are ready to conclude the proof of Proposition 5. Let f be HU,T -optimal
with Y = Ūf . Let u, v be any two leaves of T . We have by the previous claim
that (Ye )e∈PathT (u,v) are mutually independent. Since Yu and Yv are independent
uniform {0, 1} it must be that there is an edge e ∈ PathT (u, v) with H(Ye ) = 1.
Indeed, define pe = P[Ye = 1] and θe = 1 − 2pe . Then by Proposition 4 we have
Y
0 = 1 − 2P[Yu 6= Yv ] =
θe ,
e∈PathT (u,v)
which implies that at least one θe = 0. Let S ′ be the set of all edges where
H(Ye ) = 1. Then we have shown that S ′ is an isolating set. Note furthermore that
if e ∈ Sf then H(Ye ) ≥ H(2−n ) > 0. From f ’s optimality we obtain
n − 1 = HU,T (f ) ≥ |S ′| + |Sf \ S ′ |H(2−n ).
Therefore we must have Sf = S ′ and |S ′| = n − 1 which implies that Sf is a
minimal isolating set as needed.
3.2 The Rooted Star is Optimal
Let T = (V, E) ∈ Tn and S a minimal isolating set of T . Let T 0 be the tree
obtained from T by contracting all edges not in S. By Proposition 3, T 0 is an
n-node tree where each node (leaf or internal) is (uniquely) labelled by a leaf of
T . Let Tn0 be all such trees on n nodes. By Proposition 5, the AML phylogeny
estimator is among Tn0 . Note that for T ∈ Tn0 the only possible extension is
trivially f = 1 since there are no unlabelled internal vertices.
Proposition 6 (Rooted Star is Optimal) Let T = (V, E) ∈ Tn . Let W be the set
of leaf edges of T , except the edge pendant at 0. Then for ε, δ > 0 sufficiently
small the following holds. Assume X ∼ CFN(T, p) with corresponding random
cluster parameterization satisfying 0 < θe ≤ ε for all e ∈ W and 1 > θe > 1 − δ
for all e ∈
/ W . Then, among all trees T ′ ∈ Tn0 , the star rooted at 0 uniquely
minimizes HX,T ′ (1) for all δ sufficiently small.
Proof: We assume that δ and ε are small enough so that they satisfy
(n − 1)(1 − δ)2n−4 > n − 2,
11
and
ε2 < (n − 1)(1 − δ)2n−4 − (n − 2).
(5)
Let T ′ = (V ′ , E ′ ) ∈ Tn0 and f = 1 with corresponding variables (Y0 , {Ye }e∈E ′ )
where Y0 = X0 and Yu,v = 1{Xu 6= Xv }. Let e = (u, v) be an edge in T ′ . In
particular, note that u and v are leaves of T . Let pu,v be the probability that u and
v disagree and let θu,v = 1 − 2pu,v . We will use the following Taylor expansion
of the entropy around 1/2
1−τ
log2 e
H
=1−
τ 2 + O(τ 4 ).
2
2
Note further that
H(Ye ) = H(pu,v ) = H
1 − θu,v
2
.
As ε approaches 0, pu,v goes to 1/2. Therefore, by Proposition 4, up to smaller
order terms we want to find T ′ = (V ′ , E ′ ) in Tn0 that maximizes
X
Y
Θ(T ′ ) :=
θe2 .
e′ =(u,v)∈E ′ e∈PathT (u,v)
If T ′ has an edge e′ between two leaves neither of which is 0, then e′ makes a
contribution of at most ε4 to Θ(T ′ ) since PathT (u, v) crosses two edges in W .
Therefore, by (5),
Θ(T ′ ) ≤ (n − 2)ε2 + ε4
< (n − 1)(1 − δ)2n−4 ε2 ,
where we have used that T ′ has exactly n − 1 edges and each edge e′′ ∈ E ′ makes
a contribution of at most ε2 since PathT (u, v) contains at least one edge in W . On
the other hand, the star rooted at 0, which we denote by T ∗ , is the only tree in Tn0
which does not include an edge between two leaves neither of which is 0. In that
case, we get
Θ(T ∗ ) ≥ (n − 1)(1 − δ)2(n−2) ε2 ,
where we have used that any path between 0 and another leaf in T contains at
most n − 2 edges not in W (since |E| ≤ 2n − 3 and |W | = n − 1) and exactly
one edge in W . Taking ε small enough gives the result.
12
4 Concluding remarks
It would be interesting to extend our results beyond the 2-state case. We note
in particular that for the symmetric r-state model, with r > 2, the equivalent
formulation of the AML problem given in Definition 3 does not apply. Indeed, it
is easy to check that, instead, one needs to minimize
X de
X de
′
H (T | λ) =
H
+ log2 (r − 1)
.
k
k
e∈E
e∈E
The second term on the r.h.s.—a parsimony “correction”—may lead to a different
behavior when r > 2.
We thank Peter Ralph for sharing his recent, independent results [14] regarding
the structure of the optimal solution in the 2-state case (similarly to [2]) as well as
a number of simulations on 4-taxon trees.
References
[1] L. Addario-Berry, B. Chor, M. Hallett, J. Lagergren, A. Panconesi, T. Wareham, “Ancestral Maximum Likelihood of Evolutionary Trees is Hard,” Jour.
of Bioinformatics and Comp. Biology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 257-271, 2004.
[2] N. Alon, B. Chor, F. Pardi, A. Rapoport, “Approximate maximum parsimony
and ancestral maximum likelihood,” to appear in IEEE/ACM Transactions on
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 2008.
[3] D. Barry, J. Hartigan, “Statistical analysis of hominoid molecular evolution,”
Stat. Sci., 2, pp. 191-207, 1987.
[4] D. Barry, J. Hartigan, “Rejoinder [on Statistical analysis of hominoid molecular evolution],” Stat. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 209-210, 1987.
[5] J. A. Cavender, “Taxonomy with confidence,” Math. Biosci., vol. 40, no. 3-4,
1978.
[6] B. Chor, T. Tuller, “Finding the maximum likelihood tree is hard,” in Proc.
9th Annual International Symposium on Research in Computational Biology
(RECOMB 2005), 2005.
13
[7] J. S. Farris, “A probability model for inferring evolutionary trees”, Syst. Zool.,
vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 250-256, 1973.
[8] J. Felsenstein, 1978. “Cases in which parsimony or compatiability methods
will be positively misleading”, Syst. Biol., 27, pp. 401–410.
[9] J. Felsenstein, Inferring phylogenies, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 2004.
[10] N. Goldman, 1990. “Maximum likelihood inference of phylogenetic trees,
with special reference to a Poisson process of DNA substitution and to parsimony analysis”, Syst. Zool. 39, pp. 345–361.
[11] P. A. Goloboff, “Parsimony, likelihood, and simplicity,” Cladistics, vol. 19,
pp. 91-103, 2003.
[12] V. Moulton, M. Steel, “Peeling phylogenetic ‘oranges’,” Adv. in Appl. Math.,
vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 710-727, 2004.
[13] J. Neyman, “Molecular studies of evolution: a source of novel statistical
problems,” in Statistical desicion theory and related topics, (eds. S. S. Gupta
and J. Yackel), pp. 1-27, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
[14] P. Ralph, in preparation, 2008.
[15] S. Roch, “A Short Proof that Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction by Maximum
Likelihood is Hard,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and
Bioinformatics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 92-94, 2006.
14
| 5cs.CE
|
Stationary signal processing on graphs
Nathanaël Perraudin and Pierre Vandergheynst
∗
April 25, 2017
arXiv:1601.02522v5 [cs.DS] 21 Apr 2017
Abstract
Graphs are a central tool in machine learning and information processing as they allow to conveniently capture the structure of complex datasets. In this context, it is of high importance to
develop flexible models of signals defined over graphs or networks. In this paper, we generalize the
traditional concept of wide sense stationarity to signals defined over the vertices of arbitrary weighted
undirected graphs. We show that stationarity is expressed through the graph localization operator
reminiscent of translation. We prove that stationary graph signals are characterized by a well-defined
Power Spectral Density that can be efficiently estimated even for large graphs. We leverage this
new concept to derive Wiener-type estimation procedures of noisy and partially observed signals and
illustrate the performance of this new model for denoising and regression.
Index terms— Stationarity, graphs, spectral graph theory, graph signal processing, power spectral
density, Wiener filter, covariance estimation, Gaussian markov random fields
1
Introduction
Stationarity is a traditional hypothesis in signal processing used to represent a special type of statistical
relationship between samples of a temporal signal. The most commonly used is wide-sense stationarity,
which assumes that the first two statistical moments are invariant under translation, or equivalently that
the correlation between two samples depends only on their time difference. Stationarity is a corner stone
of many signal analysis methods. The expected frequency content of stationary signals, called Power
Spectral Density (PSD), provides an essential source of information used to build signal models, generate
realistic surrogate data or perform predictions. In Figure 1, we present an example of a stationary process
(blue curve) and two predictions (red and green curves). As the blue signal is a realization of a stationary
process, the red curve is more probable than the green one because it respects the frequency content of
the observed signal.
Classical stationarity is a statement of statistical regularity under arbitrary translations and thus
requires a regular structure (often "time"). However many signals do not live on such a regular structure.
For instance, imagine that instead of having one sensor returning a temporal signal, we have multiple
sensors living in a two-dimensional space, each of which delivers only one value. In this case (see Figure 2
left), the signal support is no longer regular. Since there exists an underlying continuum in this example
(2D space), one could assume the existence of a 2D stationary field and use Kriging [1] to interpolate
observations to arbitrary locations, thus generalizing stationarity for a regular domain but irregularly
spaced samples.
On the contrary, the goal of this contribution is to generalize stationarity for an irregular domain that
is represented by a graph, without resorting to any underlying regular continuum. Graphs are convenient
for this task as they are able to capture complicated relations between variables. In this work, a graph is
composed of vertices connected by weighted undirected edges and signals are now scalar values observed
at the vertices of the graph. Our approach is to use a weak notion of translation invariance, define on a
graph, that captures the structure (if any) of the data. Whereas classical stationarity means correlations
are computed by translating the auto-correlation function, here correlations are given by localizing a
common graph kernel, which is a generalized notion of translation as detailed in Section 2.2.
Figure 2 (left) presents an example of random multivariate variable living in a 2-dimensional space.
Seen as scattered samples of an underlying 2D stochastic function, one would (rightly) conclude it is not
stationary. However, under closer inspection, the observed values look stationary within the spiral-like
∗ EPFL, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, LTS2 Laboratoire de traitement du signal, CH-1015 Lausanne,
Switzerland
1
Figure 1: Signal prediction. The red curve is more likely to occur than the green curve because it respects
the frequency statistics of the blue curve.
structure depicted by the graph in Figure 2 (right). The traditional Kriging interpolation technique would
ignore this underlying structure and conclude that there are always rapid two dimensional variations in
the underlying continuum space. This problem does not occur in the graph case, where the statistical
relationships inside the data follow the graph edges resulting in this example in signals oscillating smoothly
over the graph. A typical example of a stationary signal on a graph would be the result of a survey
Figure 2: Example of stationary graph signals. The graph connections express relationships between
the different elements of one signal. In this case, the signal varies smoothly along the snail shape of the
graph.
performed by the users of a social network. If there is a relationship between a user’s answers and those
of his neighbors, this relationship is expected to be constant among all users. Using stationarity on the
graph, we could predict the most probable answer for users that never took the survey.
1.1
Contributions
We use spectral graph theory to extend the notion of stationarity to a broader class of signals. Leveraging
the graph localization operator, we establish the theoretical basis of this extension in Section 3. We show
that the resulting notion of stationarity is equivalent to the proposition of Girault [2, Definition 16],
although the latter is not defined in terms of a localization operator. Localization is a very desirable
feature, since it naturally expresses the scale at which samples are strongly correlated.
2
Since our framework depends on the power spectral density (PSD), we generalize the Welch method [3,
4] in Section 4 and obtain a scalable and robust way to estimate the PSD. It improves largely the covariance
estimation when the number of signals is limited.
Based on the generalization of Wiener filters, we propose a new regularization term for graph signal
optimization instead of the traditional Dirichlet prior, that depends on the noise level and on the PSD of
the signal. The new optimization scheme presented in Section 5 has three main advantages: 1) it allows
to deal with an arbitrary regularization parameter, 2) it adapts to the data optimally as we prove that
the optimization model is a Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimator, and 3) it is more scalable and
robust than a traditional Gaussian estimator.
Finally, in Section 6, we show experimentally that common datasets such as USPS follow our stationarity assumption. In section 7, we exploit this fact to perform missing data imputation and we show how
stationarity improves over classical graph models and Gaussian MAP estimator.
1.2
Related work
Graphs have been used for regularization in data applications for more than a decade [5, 6, 7, 8] and two
of the most used models will be presented in Section A. The idea of graph filtering was hinted at by the
machine learning community [6] but developed for the spectral graph wavelets proposed by Hammond et
al. [9] and extended by Shuman et al. in [10]. While in most cases, graph filtering is based on the graph
Laplacian, Moura et al. [11] have suggested to use the adjacency matrix instead.
We note that a probabilistic model using Gaussian random fields has been proposed in [12, 13]. In
this model, signals are automatically graph stationary with an imposed covariance matrix. Our model
differentiates itself from these contributions because it is based on a much less restrictive hypothesis and
uses the point of view of stationarity. A detailed explanation is given at the end of Section 3.
Finally, stationarity on graphs has been recently proposed in [14, 2] by Girault et al. These contributions use a different translation operator, promoting energy preservation over localization. While
seemingly different, we show that our approach and Girault’s result in the same graph spectral characterization of stationary signals. Girault et al [15] have also shown that using the Laplacian as a regularizer
in a de-noising problem (Tikhonov) is equivalent to applying a Wiener filter adapted to a precise class of
graph signals. In [2, pp 100], an expression of graph Wiener filter can be found.
After the publication of the first version of this contribution, additional work was done on the topic.
First some PSD estimation methods were proposed in [16, 17]. Then stationarity has been extended to
time evolving signals on graphs in [18, 19].
2
Background theory
2.1
Graph signal processing
Graph nomenclature A graph G = {V, E, W} is defined by two sets: V, E and a weight function W.
V is the set of vertices representing the nodes of the graph and E is the set of edges that connect two
nodes if there is a particular relation between them. In this work all graphs are undirected. To obtain a
finer structure, this relation can be quantified by a weight function W : V × V → R that reflects to what
extent two nodes are related to each other. Let us index the nodes from 1, . . . , N = |V| and construct the
weight matrix W ∈ RN ×N by setting W [i, n] = W(vi , vn ) as the weight associated to the edge connecting
the node i and the node n. When no edge exists
PN between i and n, the weight is set to 0. For a node
vi ∈ V, the degree d[i] is defined as d[i] = n=1 W [i, n]. In this framework, a signal is defined as a
function f : V → R (this framework can be extended to C) assigning a scalar value to each vertex. It is
convenient to consider a signal f as a vector of size N with the nth component representing the signal
value at the nth vertex.
The most fundamental operator in graph signal-processing is the (combinatorial) graph Laplacian,
defined as: L = D − W, where D is the diagonal degree matrix (D[i, i] = d[i]).
Spectral theory Since the Laplacian L is always a symmetric positive semi-definite matrix, we know
from the spectral theorem that it possesses a complete set of orthonormal eigenvectors. We denote
them by {u` }`=0,1,...,N −1 . For convenience, we order the set of real, non-negative eigenvalues as follows:
0 = λ0 < λ1 ≤ · · · ≤ λN −1 = λmax . When the graph is connected1 , there is only one zero eigenvalue.
In fact, the multiplicity of the zero eigenvalue(s) is equal to the number of connected components. For
1a
path connects each pair of nodes in the graph
3
more details on spectral graph theory, we refer the reader to [20, 21]. The eigenvectors of the Laplacian
are used to define a graph Fourier basis [5, 10] which we denote as U . The eigenvalues are considered as
a generalization of squared frequencies. The Laplacian matrix can thus be decomposed as
L = U ΛU ∗ ,
where U ∗ denotes the transposed conjugate of U . The graph Fourier transform is written fˆ = U ∗ f and
its inverse f = U fˆ. This Graph Fourier Transform possesses interesting properties further studied in [10].
Note that the graph Fourier transform is equivalent to the Discrete Fourier transform for cyclic graphs.
The detailed computation for the "ring" can be found in [22, pp 136-137].
Graph convolutive filters The graph Fourier transform plays a central role in graph signal processing
since it allows a natural extension of filtering operations. In the classical setting, applying a filter
to a signal is equivalent to a convolution, which is simply a point-wise multiplication in the spectral
domain. For a graph signal, where the domain is not regular, filtering is still well defined, as a point-wise
multiplication in the spectral domain [10, Equation 17]. A graph convolutive filter g(L) is defined from
a continuous kernel g : R+ → R. In the spectral domain, filtering a signal s with a convolutive filter
g(L) is, as the classical case, a point-wise multiplication written as ŝ0 [`] = g(λ` ) · ŝ[`], where ŝ0 , ŝ are the
Fourier transform of the signals s0 , s. In the vertex domain, we have
s0 := g(L)s = U g(Λ)U ∗ s,
(1)
where g(Λ) is a diagonal matrix with entries g(λ` ). For convenience, we abusively call ’filter’ the generative kernel g. We also drop the term convolutive as we are only going to use this type of filters. A
comprehensive definition and study of these operations can be found in [10]. It is worth noting that these
formulas make explicit use of the Laplacian eigenvectors and thus its diagonalization. The complexity of
this operation is in general O(N 3 ). In order to avoid this cost, there exist fast filtering algorithms based
on Chebyshev polynomials or the Lanczos method [9, 23]. These methods scale with the number of edges
|E| and reduce the complexity to O(|E|), which is advantageous in the case of sparse graphs.
2.2
Localization operator
As most graphs do not possess a regular structure, it is not possible to translate a signal around the
vertex set with an intuitive shift. As stationarity is an invariance with respect to translation, we need
to address this issue first. A solution is present in [10, Equation 26], where Shuman et. al. define the
generalized translation for graphs as a convolution with a Kroneker delta. The convolution ∗ is defined
as the element-wise multiplication in the spectral domain leading to the following generalized translation
definition:
N
−1
X
Ti s[n] := (s ∗ δi )[n] =
ŝ[`]u∗` [i]u` [n].
`=0
Naturally, the generalized translation operator does not perform what we would intuitively expect
from it, i.e it does not shift a signal s from node n to node i as this graph may not be shift-invariant.
Instead when ŝ changes smoothly across the frequencies (more details later on), then Ti s is localized
around node i, while s is in general not localized at a particular node or set of nodes.
In order to avoid this issue, we define the localization operator as follows
Definition 1. Let C be the set of functions R+ → R. For a graph kernel g ∈ C (defined in the spectral
domain) and a node i, the localization operator Ti : C → RN reads:
Ti g[n] :=
N
−1
X
g(λ` )u∗` [i]u` [n] = (g(L)δi )[n] = g(L)[i, n].
(2)
`=0
Here we use the calligraphic notation Ti to differentiate with the generalized translation operator Ti .
We first observe from (2) that the ith line of graph filter matrix g(L) is the kernel g localized at node
i. Intuitively, it signifies [g(L)s](i) = hs, Ti gi. We could replace g(λ` ) by ŝ[`] in Definition 1 and localize
the discrete vector ŝ instead. We prefer to work with a kernel for two reasons. 1) In practice when the
graph is large, the Fourier basis cannot be computed making it impossible to localize a vector. On the
other side, for a kernel g, there are techniques to approximate Ti g. 2) The localization properties are
theoretically easier to interpret when g is a filter. Let us suppose that g is a K order polynomial, then the
4
support of Ti g is exactly contained in a ball of radius K centered at node i. Building on this idea, for a
sufficiently regular function g, it has been proved in [10, Theorem 1 and Corollary 2] that the localization
operator concentrates the kernel g around the vertex i.
Let us now clarify how generalized translation and localization are linked. The main difference between
these two operators is the domain on which they are applied. Whereas, the translation operator acts on
a discrete signal defined in the time or the vertex domain, the localization operator requires a continuous
kernel or alternatively a discrete signal in the spectral domain. Both return a signal in the time or the
vertex domain. To summarize, the localization operator can be seen as computing the inverse Fourier
transform first and then translating the signal. It is an operator that takes a filter from the spectral
domain and localizes it at a given node i while adapting it to the graph structure.
In the classical periodic case ("ring" graph), localization is strongly connected to translation as the
localized kernels are translated versions of each other:
Ti g[n]
=
N
`n
`i
1 X
g(λ` )e−j2π N ej2π N
N
=
N
`(n−i)
1 X
g(λ` )ej2π N = T0 g[n − i].
N
`=1
(3)
`=1
In this case, localizing a kernel g can be done by computing the inverse discrete Fourier transform of
the vector ŝ(`) = g(λ` ) and then translating at node i. However, for irregular graphs, localization differs
from translation because the shape of the localized filter adapts to the graph and varies as a function
of its topology. Figure 3 shows an example of localization using the Mexican hat wavelet filter. The
shape of the localized filter depends highly on the graph topology. However, we observe that the general
shape of the wavelet is preserved. It has large positive values around the node where it is localized. It
then goes negative a few nodes further away and stabilizes at zero for nodes far away. To summarize,
the localization operator preserves the global behavior of the filter while adapting to the graph topology.
Additional insights about the localization operator can be found in [10, 9, 24, 25].
Figure 3: Top left: Mexican hat filter in the spectral domain g(x) =
localized around three different vertices (highlighted by a black circle).
5
5x
λmax
2
exp − λ25x
. The filter is
2
max
2.3
Stationarity for temporal signals
Let x[t] be a time indexed stochastic
process. Throughout this paper, all random variables are written
in bold fonts. We use mx = E x to denote the expected value of x. In this section, we work with the
periodic discrete case.
Definition 2 (Time Wide-Sense Stationarity). A signal is Time Wide-Sense Stationary (WSS) if its
first two statistical moments are invariant under translation, i.e:
1. mx [t] = E x[t] = c ∈ R,
2. E (x[t] − mx )(x[s] − mx )∗ = ηx [t − s],
where ηx is called the autocorrelation function of x.
Note that using (3), the autocorrelation can be written in terms of the localization operator:
ηx [t − s] = Ts γx [t].
(4)
For a WSS signal, the autocorrelation function depends only on one parameter, t − s, and is linked to
the Power Spectral Density (PSD) through the Wiener-Khintchine Theorem [26]. The latter states that
the PSD of the stochastic process x denoted γx [`] is the Fourier transform of its auto-correlation :
N
`t
1 X
ηx [t]e−j2π N ,
γx [`] = √
N i=1
(5)
√
where j = −1. As a consequence, when a signal is convolved with a filter ȟ, its PSD is multiplied by
the energy of the convolution kernel: for y = ȟ ∗ x, we have
2
γy [`] = |h[`]| γx [`],
where h[`] is the Fourier transform of ȟ. For more information about stationarity, we refer the reader
to [27].
When generalizing these concepts to graphs, the underlying structure for stationarity will no longer
be time, but graph vertices.
3
Stationarity of graph signals
We now generalize stationarity to graph signals. While we define stationarity through the localization
operator, Girault [14] uses an isometric translation operator instead. That proposition is briefly described
in Section 3.2, where we also show the equivalence of both definitions.
3.1
Stationarity under the localization operator
Let x ∈ RN be a stochastic graph signal with a finite number of variables indexed by the vertices of
a weighted undirected graph. The expected value of each
variable is written mx [i] = E x[i] and the
covariance matrix of the stochastic signal is Σx = E (x − mx )(x − mx )∗ ). We additionally define
x̃ = x − mx . For discrete time WSS processes, the covariance matrix Σx is Toeplitz, or circulant for
periodic boundary conditions, reflecting translation invariance. In that case, the covariance is diagonalized
by the Fourier transform. We now generalize this property to take into account the intricate graph
structure.
As explained in Section 2.2, the localization operator adapts a kernel to the graph structure. As a
result, our idea is to use the localization operator to adapt the correlation between the samples to the
graph structure. This results in a localized version of the correlation function, whose properties can then
be studied via the associated kernel.
Definition 3. A stochastic graph signal x defined on the vertices of a graph G is called Graph Wide-Sense
(or second order) Stationary (GWSS), if and only if it satisfies the following properties:
1. its first moment is constant over the vertex set: mx [i] = E x[i] = c ∈ R and
6
2. its covariance is the result of localizing a graph kernel:
Σx [i, n] = E (x[i] − mx )(x[n] − mx ) = Ti γx [n].
The first part of the above definition is equivalent to the first property of time WSS signals. The
requirement for the second moment is a natural generalization where we are imposing an invariance with
respect to the localization operator instead of the translation. It is a generalization of Definiton 2 using (4).
In simple words, the covariance is assumed to be driven by a global kernel (filter) γx . The localization
operator adapts this kernel to the local structure of the graph and provides the correlation between the
vertices. Additionally, Definition 3 implies that the spectral components of x are uncorrelated.
Theorem 1. A signal is GWSS if and only if its covariance matrix Σx is jointly diagonalizable with the
Laplacian of G with2 γx (λ` ) = u∗` Σx u` , i.e Σx = U Γx U ∗ , where Γx is a diagonal matrix.
Proof. By Definition 1, the covariance localization operator can be written as:
Ti γx [n] = γx (L)[i, n] = U γx (Λ)U ∗ [i, n]
(6)
where γx (Λ) is a diagonal matrix satisfying γx (Λ)[`, `] = γx (λ` ). To complete the proof set Γx =
γx (Λ).
The choice of the filter γx in this result is somewhat arbitrary, but we shall soon see that we are
interested in localized kernels. In that case, γx will be typically be the lowest degree polynomial satisfying
the constraints and can be constructed using Lagrange interpolation for instance.
Definition 3 provides a fundamental property of the covariance. The size of the correlation (distance
over the graph) depends on the support of localized the kernel Ti γx . In [10, Theorem 1 and Corollary 2],
it has been proved that the concentration of Ti γx around i depends on the regularity3 of γx . For example,
if γx is a polynomial of degree K, it is exactly localized in a ball of radius K. Hence we will be mostly
interested in such low degree polynomial kernels.
The graph spectral covariance matrix of a stochastic graph signal is given by Γx = U ∗ Σx U . For a
GWSS signal this matrix is diagonal and the graph power spectral density (PSD) of x becomes:
γx (λ` ) = (U ∗ Σx U )`,` .
(7)
Table 1 presents the differences and the similarities between the classical and the graph case. For a regular
cyclic graph (ring), the localization operator is equivalent to the traditional translation and we recover
the classical cyclic-stationarity results by setting ηx = T0 γx . Our framework is thus a generalization of
stationarity to irregular domains.
Example 1 (Gaussian i.i.d. noise (see
also [14])). Normalized Gaussian i.i.d. noise is GWSS for any
graph. Indeed, the first moment is E x[k] = 0. Moreover, the covariance matrix can be written as
I = Σx = U IU ∗ with any orthonormal matrix U and thus is diagonalizable with any graph Laplacian.
We also observe that the PSD is constant, which implies that similar to the classical case, white noise
contains all "graph frequencies".
When γx is a bijective function, the covariance matrix contains an important part of the graph
structure: the Laplacian eigenvectors4 . On the contrary, if γx is not bijective, some of the graph structure
is lost as it is not possible to recover all eigenvectors. This is for instance the case when the covariance
matrix is low-rank. As another example, let us consider completely uncorrelated centered samples with
variance 1. In this case, the covariance matrix becomes Σx = I and loses all graph information, even if
by definition the stochastic signal remains stationary on the graph.
One of the crucial benefits of stationarity is that it is preserved by filtering, while the PSD is simply
reshaped by the filter. The same property holds on graphs.
2 If the graph Laplacian has an eigenspace of multiplicity greater than one, this condition implies that all eigenvalues of
the covariance matrix associated with this eigenspace are equal, i.e., if λ`1 = λ`2 , then u∗`1 Σx u`1 = u∗`2 Σx u`2 . On a ring
graph, it ensures 1) that the Fourier transform of the PSD to be symmetric with respect to the 0 frequency, and 2) that
the autocorrelation ηx is real and symmetric.
3 A regular kernel can be well approximated by a smooth function, for instance a low order polynomial, over the spectrum
of the laplacian.
4 If the laplacian contains eigenvalues with multiplicity, then the covariance matrix contains all its eigenspaces.
7
Theorem 2. When a graph filter g is applied to a GWSS signal, the result remains GWSS, the mean
becomes mg(L)x = mx g(0) and the PSD satisfies:
γg(L)x (λ` ) = |g(λ` )|2 · γx (λ` ).
(8)
Proof. The output of a filter g can be written as x0 = g(L)x̃ + g(L)mx . If the input signal x is GWSS,
we can check easily that the first moment of the filter’s output is constant, E{g(L)x[i]} = g(L)E{mx } =
g(0)mx . The computation of the second moment gives:
n
∗ o
= g(L)E {x̃x̃∗ } g(L)∗
E g(L)x̃ g(L)x̃
= g(L)Σx g(L)∗
= U g 2 (Λ)γx (Λ)U ∗ ,
which is equivalent to our claim.
Theorem 2 provides a simple way to artificially produce stationary signals with a prescribed PSD by
simply filtering white noise :
The resulting signal will be stationary with PSD g 2 . In the sequel, we assume for simplicity that the
signal is centered at 0, i.e: mx = 0. Note that the input white noise could well be non-Gaussian.
Classical
Graph
Translation
E x[t] = mx = c ∈ R
Σx [t, s] = E x̃[t]x̃∗ [s] = ηx [t − s]
The localization operator
E x[i] = mx = c ∈ R
Σx [i, n] = E x̃[i]x̃∗ [n] = γx (L)i,n
Σx diagonalizable with L
Wiener Khintchine
Σx Toeplitz
PN
t`
γx (λ` ) = √1N i=1 ηx [t]e−j2π N
γx (λ` ) = (Γx )`,` = (U ∗ Σx U )`,`
Result of filtering
γǧ∗x (λ` ) = |g(λ` )|2 · γx (λ` )
γg(L)x [`] = |g(λ` )|2 · γx (λ` )
Stationary with respect to
First moment
Second moment
(We use x̃ = x − mx )
Table 1: Comparison between classical and graph stationarity. In the classical case, we work with a N
periodic discrete signal and we use ǧ to denote the inverse Fourier transform of g.
3.2
Comparison with the work of B. Girault
Stationarity for graph signals has been defined in the past [2, 14]. The proposed definition is based on
an isometric graph translation operator defined for a graph signal s as:
s !
L
TB s := exp j2π
s = b(L)s,
ρG
q
where b(x) = exp j2π ρxG and ρG is an upper bound5 on λmax . While this operator conserves the
energy of the signal (kTB sk2 = ksk2 ), it does not have localization properties. In a sense, one trades
localization for isometry. Using this operator, the stationarity definition of Girault [2, 14] is a natural
extension of the classical case (Definition 2).
Definition 4. [2, Definition 16] A stochastic signal x on the graph G is Wide-Sense Stationary (WSS)
if and only if
1. E {TB x} = E {x}
5ρ
G
= maxi∈V
p
¯
¯ =
2d[i](d[i] + d[i])
where d[i]
P
N
n =1 W [i,n]d[n]
d[i]
8
∗
2. E TB x (TB x) = E {xx∗ }
While this definition is based on a fairly different construction, the resulting notion of stationarity is
similar. We distinguish two cases: 1) In the case where all eigenvalues are disjoint, they are equivalent.
Indeed, [2, Theorem 7] says that if a signal is stationary with Definition 4, then its first moment is constant
and the covariance matrix in the spectral domain U ∗ Σx U has to be diagonal. Using Theorem 1, we
therefore recover Definition 3. 2) In the case where the graph has at least an eigenvalue with multiplicity,
e.g., a ring graph, our Definition 3 is more restrictive than Definition 4, since we need for every λ`1 =
λ`2 , that γx (λ`1 ) = γx (λ`2 ). As a result, there exist signals that are only stationary according to the
Definition 4 of Girault, but not according to our Definition 3. As a consequence, for real signals on a ring
graph, our definition forces the autocorrelation function to be symmetric, matching exactly the classical
stationarity Definition 2, whereas this is not true for Girault’s definition.
Let us consider as an example the ring graph with real sine/cosine Fourier basis. Note that a different
k
), where w ∼ N (0, 1).
basis choice leads to the same conclusion. The stochastic signal x[i] = w cos(2πi N
This signal is made of a single graph Fourier mode, i.e., x = wu2k−1 . The first moment is given by
E{x} = u2k−1 E{w} = 0 and the covariance matrix reads:
k
k
cos 2πi
.
Σx [n, i] = E{x[n]x[i]} = cos 2πn
N
N
To verify the stationary property of this signal, let us observe this quantity in the spectral domain:
(
N
if `1 = `2 = 2k − 1
∗
.
u`1 Σx u`2 = 4
0 otherwise
This signal is not stationary according to the classical definition. Indeed it is not invariant with respect
N
N
to translation. To observe it, just compute 1 = E{x[N ]x[N ]} =
6 E{x[ 4k
]x[ 4k
]} = 0. Our definition agrees
to this: Applying Theorem 1, even if the covariance matrix in the spectral domain is diagonal, we find
that the signal is not stationary. Indeed, we cannot find a kernel satisfying g(λ` ) = u∗` Σx u` for all ` as
we have λ2k = λ2k−1 and 0 = u∗2k Σx u2k 6= u∗2k−1 Σx u2k−1 = N4 . However, according to the definition by
Girault, this signal is stationary [2, Theorem 7].
Another key difference is that our definition allows us to generalize the notion of PSD to the graph
setting in a simpler manner. To extend the notion of PSD using Girault’s definition, one would have
to deal with a block diagonal structure of the covariance matrix in the spectral domain that changes
depending on the choice of eigenvectors at eigenvalue multiplicities6 .
3.3
Gaussian random field interpretation
The framework of stationary signals on graphs can be interpreted using Gaussian Markov Random Field
(GMRF). Let us assume that the signal x is drawn from a distribution
P(x) =
1 −(x−mx )∗ p(L)(x−mx )
e
,
Zp
(9)
R
∗
where Zp = RN e−(x−mx ) p(L)(x−mx ) dx. If we assume that p(L) is invertible, drawing from this distribution will generate a stationary x with covariance matrix given by:
Σx = (p(L))
−1
= p−1 (L).
In other words, assuming a GRF probabilistic model with inverse covariance matrix p(L) leads to a
stationary graph signal with a PSD = p−1 . However a stationary graph signal is not necessarily a GRF.
Indeed, stationarity assumes statistical properties on the signal that are not necessarily based on Gaussian
distribution.
In Section 3 of [12], Gadde and Ortega have presented a GMRF model for graph signals. But they
restrict themselves to the case where p(L) = L+δI. Following a similar approach Zhang et al. [13] link the
inverse covariance matrix of a GMRF with the Laplacian. Our approach is much broader than these two
contributions since we do not make any assumption on the function p(L). Finally, we exploit properties of
stationary signals, such as the characterization of the PSD, to explicitly solve signal processing problems
in Section 5.
6 For a subspace associated with an eigenvalue with multiplicity greater than one, there exist multiple possible sets of
eigenvectors.
9
4
Estimation of the signal PSD
As the PSD is central to our method, we need a reliable and scalable way to compute it. Equation (7)
suggests a direct estimation method using the Fourier transform of the covariance matrix. We could thus
estimate the covariance Σx empirically from Ns realizations {xn }n=1...,Ns of the stochastic graph signal
x, as
Ns
X
1
(xn [i] − m̄x [i]))(xn [j] − m̄x [j])∗ ,
Σ̄x [i, j] =
Ns − 1 n=1
where m̄x [i] =
1
Ns
PNs
n=1
xn [i]. Then our estimate of the PSD would read
γ̄x (λ` ) = U ∗ Σ̄x U [`, `].
Unfortunately, when the number of nodes is considerable, this method requires the diagonalization of
the Laplacian, an operation whose complexity in the general case scales as O(N 3 ) for the number of
operations and O(N 2 ) for memory requirements. Additionally, when the number of available realizations
Ns is small, it is not possible to obtain a good estimate of the covariance matrix. To overcome these
issues, inspired by Bartlett [4] and Welch [3], we propose to use a graph generalization of the Short Time
Fourier transform [10] to construct a scalable estimation method.
Bartlett’s method can be summarized as follows. After removing the mean, the signal is first cut
into equally sized segments without overlap. Then, the Fourier transform of each segment is computed.
Finally, the PSD is obtained by averaging over segments the squared amplitude of the Fourier coefficients.
Welch’s method is a generalization that works with overlapping segments.
Figure 4: Illustration of the PSD estimation process for a temporal signal. Top right: original PSD. Top
left: a stationary signal. Bottom right: The squared modulus of the STFT of the signal. Bottom left:
Sum of the STFT squared coefficients over time. We observe that averaging the squared STFT coefficients
approximate well the PSD. This method is a version of the Welch method that is generalizable to graphs.
On the other hand, we can see the PSD estimation of both methods as the averaging over time of the
squared coefficients of a Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT). Let x̃ be a zero mean stochastic graph
10
signal, the classical PSD estimator can thus be written as
PN
2
(STFT{x̃}[`, n])
,
γ̄x [`] = n=1
N kgk22
where g is the window used for the STFT. This is shown in Figure 4.
Method Our method is based on this idea, using the windowed graph Fourier transform [10]. Instead
of a translated rectangular window in time, we use a kernel g shifted by multiples of a step τ in the
spectral domain, i.e.
λmax
gm (λ` ) = g(λ` − mτ ),
m = 1 . . . M, τ =
.
M
We then localize each spectral translation at each individual node of the graph. The coefficients of the
graph windowed Fourier transform can be seen as a matrix with elements
C[i, m] = hx, Ti gm i = [gm (L)x]i .
Our algorithm consists in averaging the squared coefficients of this transform over the vertex set. Because
graphs have an irregularP
spectrum, we additionally need a normalization factor which is given by the
norm of the window gm : ` g(λ` − mτ )2 = kgm (L)k2F , where k · kF is used for the Frobenius norm. Note
that this norm will vary for the different m. Our final estimator reads :
PN
2
kgm (L)xk22
i=1 C[i, m]
=
,
(10)
γ̄x (mτ ) =
kgm (L)k2F
kgm (L)k2F
where x is a single realization of the stationary stochastic graph signal x. This estimator provides a
discrete approximation of the PSD. Interpolation is used to obtain a continuous estimator. This approach
avoids the computation of the eigenvectors and the eigenvalues of the Laplacian.
Our complete estimation procedure is as follows. First, we design a filterbank by choosing a mother
2
2
function g (for example a Gaussian g(λ) = e−λ /σ ). A frame is then created by shifting uniformly M
2
2
times g in the spectral domain: gm (λ) = g(λ − mτ ) = e−(λ−mτ ) /σ . Second, we compute the estimator γ̄x (mτ ) from the stationary signal x. Note that if we have access to K1 realizations {xk }k=1,...,K1
of thestationary signal, we P
can, of course, average the estimator to further reduce the variance using E kgm (L)x̃k22 ≈ 1/K1 k kgm (L)x̃k k22 . Third we use the following trick to quickly approximate
kgm (L)k2F . Using K2 randomly-generated Gaussian normalized zero centered white signals, we estimate
E kgm (L)wk22 = kgm (L)k2F .
Finally, the last step consists
in computing the ratio between the two quantities and interpolating the
discrete points (mτ, g ∗ γx (mτ )).
Variance of the estimator Studying the bias of (10) reveals its interest :
PN −1
2
E kgm (L)x̃k22
`=0 (g(λ` − mτ )) γx (λ` )
,
=
P
N −1
2
kgm (L)k2F
`=0 (g(λ` − mτ ))
(11)
where x is the stationary stochastic graph signal. For a filter g well concentrated at the origin, (11) gives
a smoothed estimate of γx (mτ ). This smoothing corresponds to the windowing operation in the vertex
domain: the less localized the kernel g in the spectral domain, the more pronounced the smoothing effect
in (11) and the more concentrated the window in the vertex domain. It is very interesting to note we
recover the traditional trade-off between bias and variance in non-parametric spectral estimation. Indeed,
if g is very sharply localized on the spectrum, ultimately a Dirac delta, the estimator (10) is unbiased. Let
us now study the variance. Intuitively, if the signal is correlated only over small regions of the vertex set,
we could isolate them with localized windows of a small size and averaging those uncorrelated estimates
together would reduce the variance. These small size windows on the vertex set correspond to large bandpass kernel gm and therefore large bias. However, if those correlated regions are large, and this happens
when the PSD is localized in low-frequencies, we cannot hope to benefit from vertex-domain averaging
since the graph is finite. Indeed the corresponding windows gm on the vertex set are so large that a single
window spans the whole graph and there is no averaging effect: the variance increases precisely when we
try to suppress the bias.
11
Experimental assessment of the method Figure 5 shows the results of our PSD-estimation algorithm on a 10-nearest neighbors graph of 200 000 nodes (random geometric graph, weighted with an
exponential kernel) and only K = 1 realization of the stationary graph signal. We compare the estimation
using frames of M = 10, 30, 100 Gaussian filters. The parameters σ and τ are adapted to the number of
max
). For this
filters such that the shifted windows have an overlap of approximately 2 (τ = σ 2 = (M +1)λ
M2
experiment K2 is set to 4 and the Chebysheff polynomial order is 30 The estimated curves are smoothed
versions of the PSD.
Figure 5: Left: PSD estimation on a graph of 200 000 nodes with K = 1 measurements. Our algorithm
is able to successively estimate the PSD of a signal. Right: Computation time versus size of the graph
(average over 10 runs.). We use m = 30 filters. The algorithm scales linearly with the number of edges.
Complexity analysis The approximation scales with the number of edges of the graph O(|E|), (which
is proportional to N in many graphs). Precisely, our PSD estimation method necessitates (K + K2 )M
filtering operations (with M the number of shifts of g). A filtering operation costs approximately Oc |E|,
with Oc the order of the Chebysheff polynomial [23]. The final computational cost of the method is thus
O (Oc (K + K2 )M |E|).
Error analysis The difference between the approximation and the exact PSD is caused by three different factors.
1. The inherent bias of the estimator, which is now directly controlled by the parameter σ.
2. We estimate the expected value using K1 realization of the signal (often K1 = 1). For large graphs
N K1 and a few filters M N , this error is usually low because the variance of kgm (L)x̃k22 is
inversely proportional to bias. The estimation error improves as K11 .
3. We use a fast-filtering method based on a polynomial approximation of the filter. For a rough
approximation, σ λmax
N , this error is usually negligible. However, in the other cases, this error
may become large.
5
Graph Wiener filters and optimization framework
Using stationary signals, we can naturally extend the framework of Wiener filters [28] largely used in
signal processing for Mean Square Error (MSE) optimal linear prediction. Wiener filters for graphs have
already been succinctly proposed in [2, pp 100]. Since the construction of Wiener filters is very similar for
non-graph and graph signals, we present only the latter here. The main difference is that the traditional
frequencies are replaced by the graph Laplacian eigenvalues7 λ` . Figure 6 presents the Wiener estimation
scheme.
7 The
graph eigenvalues are equivalent to classical squared frequencies.
12
Figure 6: Wiener estimation scheme. ws is a centered random variable with covariance I. ws generates
the stationary stochastic signal x thanks to the filter s(L). The random variable y is then generated by
filtering x through h(L) and adding uncorrelated noise wn with PSD n(λ). The estimator of x given y:
x̄|y is obtained with the Wiener filter g(L). The estimation error is denoted e. For simplicity, we present
the case where mx = 0.
Graph Wiener filtering The Wiener filter can be used to produce a mean-square error optimal
estimate of a stationary signal under a linear but noisy observation model. Let us consider the GWSS
stochastic signal x with PSD of s2 (λ` ). For simplicity, we assume mx = 0 in this subsection. The
measurements y are given by:
y = h(L)x + wn ,
(12)
where h(L) is a graph filter and wn additive uncorrelated noise of PSD n(λ` ).
To recover x, Wiener filters can be extended to the graph case:
g(λ` ) =
h2 (λ
h(λ` )s2 (λ` )
.
2
` )s (λ` ) + n(λ` )
(13)
The expression above can be derived by exactly mimicking the classical case and minimizes the expected
quadratic error, which can be written as:
n
o
ˆ [`] 2 = E {x̂[`] − g(λ` )ŷ[`]}2 ,
e[`] = E x̂[`] − x̄
where x̄ = g(L)y is the estimator of x given y. Theorem 5 proves the optimality of this filter for the
graph case.
Wiener optimization In this contribution, we would like to address a more general problem. Let us
suppose that our measurements are generated as:
y = Hx + wn ,
(14)
2
where the GWSS stochastic graph signal x has a PSD denoted s (λ` ) and the noise wn a PSD of n(λ` ).
We assume x and wn to be uncorrelated. H is a general linear operator not assumed to be diagonalizable
with L. As a result, we cannot build a Wiener filter that constructs a direct estimation of the signal x.
If x varies smoothly on the graph, i.e is low frequency based, a classic optimization scheme would be the
following:
x̄|y = arg min kHx − yk22 + βx∗ Lx.
(15)
x
This optimization scheme presents two main disadvantages. Firstly, the parameter β must be tuned in
order to remove the best amount of noise. Secondly, it does not take into account the data structure
characterized by the PSD s2 (λ` ).
Our solution to overcome these issues is to solve the following optimization problem that we suggestively call Wiener optimization
x̄|y = arg min kHx − yk22 + kw(L)(x − mx )k22 ,
(16)
x
where w(λ` ) is the Fourier penalization weights. These weights are defined as
p
n(λ` )
1
w(λ` ) =
=p
.
s(λ` )
SN R(λ` )
Notice that compared to (15), the parameter β is exchanged with the PSD of the noise. As a result, if
the noise parameters are unknown, Wiener optimization does not solve completely the issue of finding
the regularization parameter. In the noise-less case, one can alternatively solve the following problem
x̄ = arg min ks−1 (L)(x − mx )k22 ,
x
13
s. t. Hx = y.
(17)
For both Problems 16 and 17 we assume that 0 × ∞ = 0. It forces x̂[`] = 0 when s(λ` ) = 0. Problem (16)
generalizes Problem (15) which assumes implicitly a PSD of λ1` and a constant noise level of γ across all
frequencies. Note that this framework generalizes two main assumptions made on the data in practice:
1. The signal is smooth on the graph, i.e: the edge derivative has a small `2 -norm. As seen before this
is done by setting the PSD as λ1` . This case is studied in [15].
2. The signal is band-limited, i.e it is a linear combination of the k lowest graph Laplacian eigenvectors.
This class of signal simply have a null PSD for λ` > λk .
Theoretical motivations for the optimization framework The first motivation is intuitive. The
weight w(λ` ) heavily penalizes frequencies associated with low SNR and vice versa.
The second and main motivation is theoretical. If we have a Gaussian Random multivariate signal
with i.i.d Gaussian noise, then Problem (16) is a MAP estimator.
Theorem 3. If x ∼ N 0, s2 (L) and wn ∼ N 0, σ 2 I , i.e: x is GWSS and Gaussian, then problem (16)
is a MAP estimator for x|y
The proof is given in Appendix B.
Theorem 4. If x is GWSS with PSD s2 (L) and wn is i.i.d white noise, i.e: n(`) = σ 2 , then problem (16)
leads to the linear minimum mean square estimator:
−1
x|y = Σxy Σ−1
(18)
y y + I − Σxy Σy H mx
with Σxy = s2 (L)H ∗ and Σy = Hs2 (L)H ∗
The proof is given in Appendix D.
Additionally, when H is jointly diagonalizable with L, Problem (16) can be solved by a single filtering
operation.
Theorem 5. If the operator H is diagonalizable with L, (i.e: H = h(L) = U a(Λ)U ∗ ), then problem (16)
is optimal with respect to the weighting w in the sense that its solution minimizes the mean square error:
(N
)
X
2
E kek22 = E kx̄ − xk22 = E
(x̄[i] − x[i]) .
i=1
Additionally, the solution can be computed by the application of the corresponding Wiener filter.
The proof is given in Appendix C.
The last motivation is algorithmic and requires the knowledge of proximal splitting methods [29, 30].
Problem (16) can be solved by a splitting scheme that minimizes iteratively each of the terms. The
minimization of the regularizer, i.e the proximal operator of kw(L)x̃k22 , becomes a Wiener de-noising
operation:
prox 21 kw(L)x̃k22 (y)
= mx + arg min kw(L)x̃k22 + kx̃ − ỹk22
x̃
= mx + g(L)ỹ = mx + g(L)(y − mx )
with
g(λ` ) =
s2 (λ` )
1
=
.
1 + w2 (λ` )
s2 (λ` ) + n(λ` )
Advantage of the Wiener optimization framework over a Gaussian MAP estimator Theorem 3 shows that the optimization framework is equivalent to a Gaussian MAP estimator. In practice,
when the data is only close to stationary, the true MAP estimator will perform better than Wiener optimization. So one could ask why we bother defining stationarity on graphs. Firstly, assuming stationarity
allows us for a more robust estimate of the covariance matrix. This is shown is in Figure 5, where only
one signal is used to estimate the PSD (and thus the covariance matrix). Another example is the USPS
experiment presented in the next section. We estimate the PSD by using only 20 digits. The final result
is much better than a Gaussian MAP based on the empirical covariance. Secondly, we have a scalable
solution for Problem (16) (See Algorithm 1 below). On the contrary the classical Gaussian MAP estimator requires the explicit computation of a large part of the covariance matrix and it’s inverse, which are
both not scalable operations.
14
Solving Problem (16) Note that Problem (16) can be solved with a simple gradient descent. However,
for a large number of nodes N , the matrix w(L) requires O(N 3 ) operations to be computed and O(N 2 ) bits
to be stored. This difficulty can be overcome by applying its corresponding filter operator at each iteration.
As already mentioned, the cost of the approximation scale with the number of edges O(Oc |E|) [23].
When s(λ` ) ≈ 0 for some λ` the operator w(L) becomes badly conditioned. To overcome this issue,
Problem (16) can be solved efficiently using a forward-backward splitting scheme [31, 29, 30]. The
proximal operator of the function kw(L)x̃k22 has been given above and we use the term kHx − yk22
as the differentiable function. Algorithm 1 uses an accelerated forward backward scheme [32] to solve
Problem (16) where β is the step size (we select β = 2λmax1(H)2 ), the stopping tolerance, J the maximum
number of iterations and δ is a very small number to avoid a possible division by 0.
Algorithm 1 Fast Wiener optimization to solve (16)
INPUT: z1 = x, u0 = x, t1 = 1, > 0, β ≤
1
2λmax (H)2
2
s (λ)
SET: g(λ) = s2 (λ)+βn(λ)
for j = 1, . . . J do
v = zj − βH ∗ (Hzj − y)
uj+1 = g(L)v
√
1+
. Wiener filter
. Gradient step
. Proximal step
1+4t2
j
tj+1 =
2
tj −1
zj+1 = zj + tj+1 (uj − uj−1 )
if
kzj+1 −zj k2F
kzj k2F +δ
. FISTA scheme
. Update step
< then
. Stopping criterion
BREAK
end if
end for
SOLUTION: zJ
6
Evidence of graph stationarity: illustration with USPS
Stationarity may not be an obvious hypothesis for a general dataset, since our intuition does not allow
us to easily capture the kind of shift invariance that is really implied. In this section we give additional
insights on stationarity from a more experimental point of view. To do so, we will show that the wellknown USPS dataset is close to stationary on a nearest neighbor graph. We show similar results with a
dataset of faces.
Images can be considered as signals on the 2-dimensional euclidean plane and, naturally, when the
signal is sampled, a grid graph is used as a discretization of this manifold. The corresponding eigenbasis is
the 2 dimensional DCT8 . Many papers have exploited the fact that natural texture images are stationary
2-dimensional signals [33, 34, 35], i.e stationary signals on the grid graph. In [36], the authors go one
step further and ask the following question: suppose that pixels of images have been permuted, can we
recover their relative two-dimensional location? Amazingly, they answer positively adding that only a
few thousand images are enough to approximately recover the relative location of the pixels. The grid
graph seems naturally encoded within images.
The observation of [36] motivates the following experiment involving stationarity on graphs. Let us
select the USPS data set which contains 9298 digit images of 16 × 16 pixels. We create 5 classes of data:
(a) the circularly shifted digits9 , (b) the original digits and (c), (d) and (e) the classes of digit 3, 7 and 9.
As a pre-processing step, we remove the mean of each pixel, thus forcing the first moment to be 0, and
focus on the second moment. For those 5 cases, we compute the covariance matrix Σ and its "Fourier
transform",
Γ = U ∗ ΣU,
(19)
for 2 different graphs: (a) the grid and (b) the 20 nearest neighbors graph. In this latter case, each node
is a pixel and is associated to a feature vector containing the corresponding pixel value of all images.
We use the squared euclidean distance between feature vectors and an exponential kernel to define edge
weights10 . We then compute the stationarity level of each class of data with both graphs using the
8 This
9 We
is a natural extension of [22]
performed all possible shifts in both directions. Because of this, the covariance matrix becomes Toeplitz
10 W [i, n]
=e
−kxi −xn k2
2
σ2
if xi is in the 20 nearest neighbors of xn .
15
Data \Graph
Shifted all digits
All digits
Digit 3
Digit 7
Digit 9
2-dimensional grid
0.86
0.66
0.64
0.52
0.52
20 nearest neighbors graph
1
0.79
0.83
0.79
0.81
2
Table 2: sr (Γ) = kdiag(Γ)k
: stationarity measures for different graphs and different datasets. The nearest
kΓkF
neighbors graph adapts to the data. The individual digits are stationary with the nearest neighbor graph.
following measure:
sr (Γ) =
! 12
P 2
Γ
kdiag(Γ)k2
P P` `,`2
=
.
kΓkF
`1
`2 Γ`1 ,`2
(20)
The closer sr (Γ) is to 1, the more diagonal the matrix Γ is and the more stationary the signal. Table
2 shows the obtained stationarity measures. The less universal the data, the less stationary it is on the
grid. Clearly, specificity inside the data requires a finer structure than a grid. This is confirmed by the
behavior of the nearest neighbors graph. When only one digit class is selected, the nearest neighbors
graph still yields very stationary signals.
Let us focus on the digit 3. For this experiment, we build a 20 nearest neighbors graph with only
50 samples. Figure 7 shows the eigenvectors of the Laplacian and of the covariance matrix. Because of
stationarity, they are very similar. Moreover, they have a 3-like shape. Since the data is almost stationary,
we can use the associated graph and the p
PSD to generate samples by filtering i.i.d Gaussian noise with
the following PSD based kernel: g(λ` ) = Γ`,` . The resulting digits have a 3-like shape confirming that
the class is stationary on the nearest neighbors graph.
Figure 7: Studying the number 3 of USPS using a 20-neighbors graph. Top left: Spectral covariance
matrix of the data (Note the diagonal shape of the matrix). We only display the upper left part for better
visibility. Top right: generated samples by filtering Gaussian random noise on the graph. Bottom left:
Covariance eigenvectors associated with the 16 highest eigenvalues. Bottom right: Laplacian eigenvectors
associated with the 16 smallest non-zero eigenvalues. Because of stationarity, Laplacian eigenvectors are
similar to the covariance eigenvectors.
To further illustrate this phenomenon on a different dataset, we use the CMUPIE set of cropped
faces. With a nearest neighbor graph we obtained a stationarity level of sr = 0.92. This has already
16
been observed in [37] where the concept of Laplacianfaces is introduced. Finally, in [38] the authors
successfully use the graph between features to improve the quality of a low-rank recovery problem. The
reason seems to be that the principal components of the data are the lowest eigenvectors of the graph,
which is again a stationarity assumption.
To intuitively motivate the effectiveness of nearest neighbors at producing stationary signals, let us
define the centering operator J = I −11> /N . Given K signal xk , the matrix of average squared distances
PN
between the centered features ( i=1 xk [i] = 0) is directly proportional to the covariance matrix :
1
Σ̄x = − JDJ,
2
(21)
PK
PK
2
1
1
where D[i, n] = K
k=1 (xk [i] − xk [n]) and Σ̄x [i, n] = K
k=1 xk [i]xk [n]. The proof is given in Appendix E. The nearest-neighbors graph can be seen as an approximation of the original distance matrix,
which pleads for using it as a good proxy destined to leverage the spectral content of the covariance.
Put differently, when using realizations of the signal as features and computing the k-NN graph we are
connecting strongly correlated variables via strong edge weights.
7
Experiments
All experiments were performed with the GSPBox [39] and the UNLocBoX [40] two open-source software
library. The code to reproduce all figures of the paper can be downloaded at: https://lts2.epfl.
ch/rrp/stationarity/. As the stationary signals are random, the reader may obtain slightly different
results. However, conclusions shall remain identical. The models used in our comparisons are detailed
in the Appendix A for completeness, where we also detail how the tuning of the parameters is done. All
experiments are evaluated with respect to the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) measure:
var(x − ẋ)
SNR(x, ẋ) = −10 log
var(x)
7.1
Synthetic dataset
In order to obtain a first insight into applications using stationarity, we begin with some classical problems
solved on a synthetic dataset. Compared to real data, this framework allows us to be sure that the signal
is stationary on the graph.
Graph Wiener deconvolution We start with a de-convolution example on a random geometric graph.
This can model an array of sensors distributed in space or simply a mesh. The signal is chosen with a low
frequency band-limited PSD. To produce the measurements, the signal is convolved with the heat kernel
h(λ) = e−τ λ . Additionally, we add some uncorrelated i.i.d Gaussian noise. The heat kernel is chosen
because it simulates a heat diffusion process. Using de-convolution we aim at recovering the original
signal before diffusion. For this experiment, we put ourselves in an ideal case and suppose that both the
PSD of the input signal and the noise level are known.
Figure 8 presents the results. We observe that Wiener filtering is able to de-convolve the measurements. The second plot shows the reconstruction errors for three different methods: Tikhonov presented
in problem (23), TV in (25) and Wiener filtering in (13). Wiener filtering performs clearly much better
than the other methods because it has a much better prior assumption.
Graph Wiener in-painting In our second example, we use Wiener optimization to solve an in-painting
problem. This time, we suppose that the PSD of the input signal is unknown and we estimate it using
50 signals. Figure 9 presents quantitative results for the in-painting. Again, we compare three different
optimization methods: Tikhonov (22), TV (25) and Wiener (16). Additionally we compute the classical
MAP estimator based on the empirical covariance matrix (see [41] 2.23). Wiener optimization performs
clearly much better than the other methods because it has a much better prior assumption. Even with
50 measurements, the MAP estimator performs poorly compared to graph methods. The reason is that
the graph contains a lot of the covariance information. Note that the PSD estimated with only one
measurement is sufficient to outperform Tikhonov and TV.
17
10x
Figure 8: Graph de-convolution on a random geometric graph. The convolution kernel is e− λmax . Top:
Signal and filters for a noise level of 0.16. Bottom: evolution of the error with respect to the noise.
Figure 9: Wiener in-painting on a geometric graph of 400 nodes. Top: true VS approximated PSD and
resulting Wiener filters. Bottom: in-painting relative error with respect to the number of measurements.
7.2
Meteorological dataset
We apply our methods to a weather measurements dataset, more precisely to the temperature and the
humidity. Since intuitively these two quantities are correlated smoothly across space, it suggests that
they are more or less stationary on a nearest neighbors geographical graph.
18
The French national meteorological service has published in open access a dataset11 with hourly
weather observations collected during the Month of January 2014 in the region of Brest (France). From
these data, we wish to ascertain that our method still performs better than the two other models (TV
and Tikhonov) on real measurements. The graph is built from the coordinates of the weather stations by
2
connecting all the neighbors in a given radius with a weight function W [i, n] = e−din τ where τ is adjusted
to obtain an average degree around 3 (τ , however, is not a sensitive parameter). For our experiments,
we consider every time-step as an independent realization of a GWSS signal. As sole pre-processing, we
remove the temperature mean of each station independently. This is equivalent to removing the first
moment. Thanks to the 744 time observation, we can estimate the covariance matrix and check whether
the signal is stationary on the graph.
Prediction - Temperature The result of the experiment with temperatures is displayed in Figure 10.
The covariance matrix shows a strong correlation between the different weather stations. Diagonalizing
it with the Fourier basis of the graph shows that the meteorological instances are not really stationary
within the distance graph as the resulting matrix is not really diagonal. However, even in this case,
Wiener optimization still outperforms graph TV and Tikhonov models, showing the robustness of the
proposed method. In our experiment, we solve a prediction problem with a mask operator covering 50
per cent of measurements and an initial average SNR of 13.4 dB . We then average the result over 744
experiments (corresponding to the 744 observations) to obtain the curves displayed in Figure 10. We
observe that Wiener optimization always performs better than the two other methods.
Prediction - Humidity Using the same graph, we have performed another set of experiments on
humidity observations. The results are displayed in Figure 11. In our experiment, we solve a prediction
problem with a mask operator covering 50% of measurements and various amount of noise. The rest of
the testing framework is identical as for the temperature and the conclusions are similar.
7.3
USPS dataset
We perform the same kind of in-painting/de-noising experiments with the USPS dataset. For our experiments, we consider every digit as an independent realization of a GWSS signal. As sole pre-processing,
we remove the mean of each pixel separately. This ensures that the first moment is 0. We create the
graph12 and estimate the PSD using only the first 20 digits and we use 500 of the remaining ones to
test our algorithm. We use a mask covering 50% of the pixel and various amount of noise. We then
average the result over 500 experiments (corresponding to the 500 digits) to obtain the curves displayed
in Figure 1213 . For this experiment, we also compare with traditional TV de-noising [42] and Tikhonov
de-noising. The optimization problems used are similar to (22). Additionally we compute the classical
MAP estimator based on the empirical covariance matrix for the solution see ([41] 2.23). The results
presented in Figure 12 show that graph optimization is outperforming classical techniques, meaning that
the grid is not the optimal graph for the USPS dataset. Wiener once again outperforms the other graphbased models. Moreover, this experiment shows that our PSD estimation is robust when the number of
signals is small. In other words, using the graph allows us for a much better covariance estimation than
a simple empirical average. When the number of measurements increases, the MAP estimator improves
in performance and eventually outperforms Wiener because the data is close to stationary on the graph.
7.4
ORL dataset
For this last experiment, we use the ORL face dataset. We have a good indication that this dataset
is close to stationary since CMUPIE (a smaller faces dataset) is also close to stationary. Each image
has 112 × 92 = 10304 pixels making it complicated to estimate the covariance matrix and to use a
Gaussian MAP estimator. Wiener optimization, on the other hand, does not necessitate an explicit
computation of the covariance matrix. Instead, we estimate the PSD using the algorithm presented in
11 Access to the raw data is possible directly through our code or through the link https://donneespubliques.
meteofrance.fr/donnees_libres/Hackathon/RADOMEH.tar.gz
12 The graph is created using patches of pixels of size 5 × 5. The pixels’ patches help because we have only a few digits
available. When the size of the data increases, a nearest neighbor graph performs even better.
13 All parameters have been tuned optimally in a probabilistic way. This is possible since the noise is added artificially.
√
The models presented in Appendix A have only one parameter to be tuned: which is set to = σ #y, where σ is the
variance of the noise and #y the number of elements of the vector y. In order to be fair with the MAP estimator, we
construct the graph with the only 20 digits used in the PSD estimation.
19
Figure 10: Experiments on the temperature of Molene. Top: Covariance matrices. Bottom left: A
realization of the stochastic graph signal (first measure). Bottom center: the temperature of the Island
of Brehat. Bottom right: Recovery errors for different noise levels.
Section 4. A detailed experiment is performed in Figure 13. After adding Gaussian noise to the image,
we remove randomly a percentage of the pixels. We consider the obtained image as the measurement
and we reconstruct the original image using TV, Tikhonov and Wiener priors. In Figure 14, we display
the reconstruction results for various noise levels. We create the graph with 300 faces14 and estimate the
PSD with 100 faces. We test the different algorithms on the 100 remaining faces.
8
Conclusion
In this contribution, we have extended the common concept of stationarity to graph signals. Using this
statistical model, we proposed a new regularization framework that leverages the stationarity hypothesis
by using the Power Spectral Density (PSD) of the signal. Since the PSD can be efficiently estimated, even
14 We
build a nearest neighbor graph based on the pixels values.
20
Figure 11: Experiments on the humidity of Molene. Top: Covariance matrices. Bottom: Recovery errors
for different noise levels.
for large graphs, the proposed Wiener regularization framework offers a compelling way to solve traditional
problems such as denoising, regression or semi-supervised learning. We believe that stationarity is a
natural hypothesis for many signals on graphs and showed experimentally that it is deeply connected
with the popular nearest neighbor graph construction. As future work, it would be very interesting to
clarify this connection and explore if stationarity could be used to infer the graph structure from training
signals, in the spirit of [43].
Acknowledgments
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped us improve the structure
of the paper, especially Section III B. We also thank Andreas Loukas, Vassilis Kalofolias and Nauman
Shahid for their useful suggestions.
This work has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation research project Towards
Signal Processing on Graphs, grant number: 2000_21/154350/1.
A
Convex models
Convex optimization has recently become a standard tool for problems such as de-noising, de-convolution
or in-painting. Graph priors have been used in this field for more than a decade [6, 7, 8]. The general
assumption is that the signal varies smoothly along the edges, which is equivalent to saying that the
signal is low-frequency-based. Using this assumption, one way to express mathematically an in-painting
problem is the following:
x̄ = arg min xT Lx
s.t.
kM x − yk2 ≤
(22)
x
where M is a masking operator and a constant computed thanks to the noise level. We could also
rewrite the objective function as xT Lx+γkM x−yk22 , but this implies a greedy search of the regularization
parameter γ even when the level of noise is known. For our simulations, we use Gaussian i.i.d. noise of
21
Figure 12: Top left: Some digits of the USPS dataset. Top right: Different PSDs. Compared to λ1 ,
the approximation is a smoothed version of the experimental PSD. Middle left: Weights matrix of the
10 nearest neighbors (patch) graph (The diagonal shape indicates the grid base topology of the graph).
Middle right: spectral covariance matrix for the first 50 graph frequencies. Since we only use 20 digits
for the graph construction, the stationarity level is low. Nevertheless, Wiener optimization outperforms
other methods. Bottom: Recovery errors for different noise levels. Methods using the graph perform
better. Even if the data is not stationary on the graph, the stationarity assumption helps a lot in the
recovery.
√
standard deviation n. It allows us to optimally set the regularization parameter = n #y, where #y is
the number of elements of the measurement vector.
Graph de-convolution can also be addressed with the same prior assumption leading to
x̄ = arg min xT Lx
s.t.
kh(L)x − yk2 ≤
(23)
x
where h is the convolution kernel. To be as generic as possible, we combine problems (22) and (23)
together leading to a model capable of performing de-convolution, in-painting and de-noising at the same
22
Figure 13: ORL dataset, single in-painting experiment. Top left: Original image. Top center: Noisy
image (SNR 12.43 dB). Top right: Measurements 50% of the noisy image. Bottom left: Reconstruction
using Tikhonov prior (SNR 12.12 dB). Bottom center: Reconstruction using classic TV prior (SNR 13.53
dB). Bottom right: Reconstruction using Wiener optimization (SNR 14.42 dB).
Figure 14: Inpainting experiments on ORL dataset. Left: some images of the dataset. Right: reconstruction error.
time:
x̄ = arg min xT Lx
s.t.
kM h(L)x − yk2 ≤ .
(24)
x
When the signal is piecewise smooth on the graph, another regularization term can be used instead of
xT Lx = k∇G xk22 , which is the `2 -norm of the gradient on the graph15 . Using the `1 -norm of the gradient
favors a small number of major changes in the signal and thus is better for piecewise smooth signals. The
resulting model is:
x̄ = arg min k∇G xk1
s.t.
kM h(L)x − yk2 ≤
(25)
x
15 The
gradient on the graph is defined as ∇G x(e) =
linking the nodes i and j.
1
2
p
W (i, j) (x(i) − x(j)), where e is the index corresponding the edge
23
In order to solve these problems, we use a subset of convex optimization tools called proximal splitting
methods. Since we are not going to summarize them here, we encourage a novice reader to consult [29, 30]
and the references therein for an introduction to the field.
B
Proof of Theorem 3
Proof. The proof is a classic development used in Bayesian machine
learning. By assumption x is a
sample of a Gaussian random multivariate signal x ∼ N mx , s2 (L) . The measurements are given by
y = Hx + wn ,
2
where wn ∼ N 0, σ and thus have the following first and second moments: y|x ∼ N Hx, σ 2 I) . For
simplicity, we assume s2 (L) to be invertible. However this assumption is not necessary. We can write the
probabilities of x and y|x as:
P(x) =
1
−1
ZHx
e−ks
(L)(x−mx )k22
P(y|x) =
=
1
ZHx
−1
e−ks
(L)x̃k22
,
1 −σ2 k(Hx−y)k22
e
.
Zsx
Using Bayes law, we find
P(x|y) =
P(y|x)P(x)
.
P(y)
The MAP estimator is
x̄|y
=
arg max P(x|y)
=
arg max log (P(x|y))
=
arg min − log (P(y|x)) − log (P(x)) + log (P(y))
x
x
x
=
arg min ks−1 (L)x̃k22 + σ −2 k(Hx − y)k22
=
arg min kw(L)x̃k22 + k(Hx − y)k22 ,
x
x
where w(L) = σs−1 (L).
C
Proof of Theorem 5
The following is a generalization of the classical proof. For simplicity, we assume that mx̃ = 0, i.e x̃ = x.
Proof. Since by hypothesis H = h(L) = U h(Λ)U ∗ , we can rewrite the optimization problem (16) in the
graph Fourier domain using the Parseval identity kxk2 = kU xk2 = kx̂k2 :
ˆ |ŷ = arg min kw(Λ)x̂k22 + kh(Λ)x̂ − ŷk22 .
x̄
x̂
Since the matrix h(Λ) is diagonal, the solution of this problem satisfies for all graph eigenvalue λ`
ˆ [`] + h2 (λ` )x̄
ˆ [`] − h(λ` )ŷ[`] = 0.
w2 (λ` )x̄
For simplicity, we drop the notation (λ` ) and [`]. The previous equation is transformed in
x̄ =
h
ŷ.
w2 + h2
As a next step, we use the fact that ŷ = hx̂ + ŵn to find:
2
ˆ¯ = h x̂ + hŵn .
x̂
w2 + h2
24
(26)
The error performed by the algorithm becomes
2
¯ − x̂ = −w x̂ + hŵn .
ê = x̂
w2 + h2
w2 + h2
The expectation of the error can thus be computed:
2
h2 E ŵn2
w4 E x̂2
hw2 E {x̂ŵn }
+
−
E ê
=
2
2
2
(w2 + h2 )
(w2 + h2 )
(w2 + h2 )
w4 s2 + h2 n
=
2 ,
(w2 + h2 )
with s2 the PSD of x and n the PSD of the noise wn . Note that E {x̂ŵn } = 0 because x and w are
uncorrelated. Let us now substitute w2 by z and minimize the expected error (for each λ` ) with respect
to z:
∂ 2
E ê
∂z
=
=
∂ z 2 s2 + h2 n
∂z (z + h2 )2
2zs2 z + h2 − 2 z 2 s2 + h2 n
3
(z + h2 )
= 0.
From the numerator, we get:
2zs2 h2 − 2h2 n = 0
The three possible solutions for z are z1 = sn2 , z2 = ∞ and z3 = −∞. z3 is not possible because z
is required to be positive. z2 leads to ẋ = 0 which is optimal only if s2 = 0. The optimal solution is
`)
therefore z(λ` ) = sn(λ
2 (λ ) , resulting in
`
s
n(λ` )
.
w(λ` ) =
s2 (λ` )
This finishes the first part of the proof. To show that the solution to (16) is a Wiener filtering operation,
`)
we replace w2 (λ` ) by sn(λ
2 (λ ) in (26) and find
`
x̂[`] =
s2 (λ` )h(λ` )
ŷ[`],
h2 (λ` )s2 (λ` ) + n(λ` )
which is the Wiener filter associated with the convolution h(L) = H.
D
Proof of Theorem 4
Proof. Let x be GWSS with covariance matrix Σx = s2 (L) and mean mx . The measurements satisfy
y = Hx + wn ,
where wn is i.i.d noise with PSD σ 2 . The variable y has a covariance matrix Σy = Hs2 (L)H ∗ + σ 2 I
and a mean my = Hmx . The covariance between x and y is Σxy = Σ∗yx = s2 (L)H ∗ . For simplicity,
we assume s2 (L) and Hs2 (L)H ∗ + σ 2 I to be invertible. However this assumption is not necessary. The
Wiener optimization framework reads:
x̄ = arg min kHx − yk22 + σ 2 ks−1 (L)(x − mx )k22 .
x
We perform the following change of variable x̃ = x − mx , ỹ = y − mx and we obtain:
¯ = arg min kH x̃ − ỹk22 + σ 2 ks−1 (L)x̃)k22 .
x̃
x̃
The solution of the problem satisfies
¯ − H ∗ ỹ + σ 2 s−2 (L)x̃
¯ = 0.
H ∗ H x̃
25
¯ and transform it as:
From this equation we get x̃
−1 ∗
H ỹ
H ∗ H + σ 2 s−2 (L)
−1
2
∗
s(L)H ∗ ỹ
= s(L) σ I + s(L)H Hs(L)
¯
x̃
=
=
1
σ2
s2 (L)H ∗ − σ12 s2 (L)H ∗ (σ 2 I+H ∗ s2 (L)H )
1 2
s (L)H ∗ I − σ 2 I + H ∗ s2 (L)H
σ2
−1
= s2 (L)H ∗ σ 2 I + H ∗ s2 (L)H
ỹ
=
=
−1
Hs2 (L)H ∗ ỹ
−1
(27)
Hs2 (L)H ∗ ỹ
Σxy Σ−1
y ỹ
where (27) follows from the Woodbury, Sherman and Morrison formula. The linear estimator of x
corresponding to Wiener optimization is thus:
x̄
=
¯ + mx
x̃
=
Σxy Σ−1
y (y − Hmx ) + mx
=
−1
Σxy Σ−1
y y + I − Σxy Σy H mx
=
Qy + (I − QH) mx
We observe that it is equivalent to the solution of the linear minimum mean square error estimator:
arg min E {kQy + b − x̄k}
2
Q,b
with y = Hx + wn . See [44, Equation 12.6].
Using similar arguments, we can prove that
x̄ = arg min ks−1 (L)(x − mx k22
x
leads to
x̄ = s2 (L) Hs2 (L)H ∗
−1
s.t. y = Xx
−1
y + I − s2 (L) Hs2 (L)H ∗
H mx
and is thus a linear minimum mean square estimator too.
E
Development of equation 21
P
1
2
Proof. Let us denote the matrix of squared distances D[i, j] = K
k |xk [i] − xk [j]| for the samples
{x1 , x2 , . . . xK } of the random multivariate variable x on a N vertex graph. Let us assume further that
PN
m[k] = n=1 xk [n] = 0. We show then that Σ̄x = − 12 JDx J where Σ̄x is the covariance (Gram) matrix
PK
1
1
defined as Σ̄x [i, j] = K
k=1 xk [i]xk [j] and J is centering matrix J[k, l] = δk [l] − N .
We have
(JDJ)[i, j] = D[i, j] + N −2
N
X
D[k, l] − N −1
k,l=1
N
X
(D[i, k] + D[k, j])
k=1
Let us substitute D[i, j] = Σ̄x [i, i] + Σ̄x [j, j] − 2Σ̄x [i, j], then we find
(JDJ)[i, j]
=
Σ̄x [i, i] + Σ̄x [j, j] − 2Σ̄x [i, j] + N
−2
2N
N
X
!
∗
Σ̄x [n, n] − 2m m
n=1
N
X
!
−
N −1
=
−2Σ̄x [i, j] − 2N −2 m∗ m + 2N −1 m∗ (x[j] + x[i]).
N Σ̄x [i, i] + N Σ̄x [j, j] + 2
Σ̄x [n, n] − 2m∗ (x[j] + x[i])
n=1
Under the assumption m[k] =
PN
n=1
xk [n] = 0, we recover the desired result Σ̄x = − 12 JDx J.
26
References
[1] C. K. Williams, “Prediction with gaussian processes: From linear regression to linear prediction and
beyond,” in Learning in graphical models. Springer, 1998, pp. 599–621.
[2] B. Girault, “Signal processing on graphs-contributions to an emerging field,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Ecole normale supérieure de lyon, 2015.
[3] P. Welch, “The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on
time averaging over short, modified periodograms,” IEEE Transactions on audio and electroacoustics,
pp. 70–73, 1967.
[4] M. S. Bartlett, “Periodogram analysis and continuous spectra,” Biometrika, pp. 1–16, 1950.
[5] D. I. Shuman, S. K. Narang, P. Frossard, A. Ortega, and P. Vandergheynst, “The emerging field
of signal processing on graphs: Extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other
irregular domains,” Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 83–98, 2013.
[6] A. J. Smola and R. Kondor, “Kernels and regularization on graphs,” in Learning theory and kernel
machines. Springer, 2003, pp. 144–158.
[7] D. Zhou and B. Schölkopf, “A regularization framework for learning from graph data,” 2004.
[8] G. Peyré, S. Bougleux, and L. Cohen, “Non-local regularization of inverse problems,” in Computer
Vision–ECCV 2008. Springer, 2008, pp. 57–68.
[9] D. K. Hammond, P. Vandergheynst, and R. Gribonval, “Wavelets on graphs via spectral graph
theory,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 129–150, 2011.
[10] D. I. Shuman, B. Ricaud, and P. Vandergheynst, “Vertex-frequency analysis on graphs,” Applied and
Computational Harmonic Analysis, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 260–291, 2016.
[11] A. Sandryhaila and J. M. Moura, “Discrete signal processing on graphs,” IEEE transactions on signal
processing, vol. 61, pp. 1644–1656, 2013.
[12] A. Gadde and A. Ortega, “A probabilistic interpretation of sampling theory of graph signals,” in
Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE,
2015, pp. 3257–3261.
[13] C. Zhang, D. Florêncio, and P. A. Chou, “Graph signal processing–a probabilistic framework,” Microsoft Res., Redmond, WA, USA, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2015-31, 2015.
[14] B. Girault, “Stationary graph signals using an isometric graph translation,” in Signal Processing
Conference (EUSIPCO), 2015 23rd European. IEEE, 2015, pp. 1516–1520.
[15] B. Girault, P. Goncalves, E. Fleury, and A. S. Mor, “Semi-supervised learning for graph to signal
mapping: A graph signal wiener filter interpretation,” in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
(ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1115–1119.
[16] A. G. Marques, S. Segarra, G. Leus, and A. Ribeiro, “Stationary graph processes and spectral
estimation,” unpublished, arXiv:1603.04667, 2016.
[17] S. P. Chepuri and G. Leus, “Subsampling for graph power spectrum estimation,” in Sensor Array
and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), 2016 IEEE. IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–5.
[18] A. Loukas and N. Perraudin,
arXiv:1611.00255, 2016.
“Stationary time-vertex signal processing,”
unpublished,
[19] N. Perraudin, A. Loukas, F. Grassi, and P. Vandergheynst, “Towards stationary time-vertex signal processing,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
(ICASSP). To appear, 2017.
[20] F. R. Chung, Spectral graph theory.
AMS Bookstore, 1997, vol. 92.
[21] F. Chung, “Laplacians and the cheeger inequality for directed graphs,” Annals of Combinatorics,
vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2005.
27
[22] G. Strang, “The discrete cosine transform,” SIAM review, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 135–147, 1999.
[23] A. Susnjara, N. Perraudin, D. Kressner, and P. Vandergheynst, “Accelerated filtering on graphs using
lanczos method,” unpublished, arXiv:1509.04537, 2015.
[24] N. Perraudin, B. Ricaud, D. Shuman, and P. Vandergheynst, “Global and local uncertainty principles
for signals on graphs,” unpublished, arXiv:1603.03030, 2016.
[25] D. I. Shuman, C. Wiesmeyr, N. Holighaus, and P. Vandergheynst, “Spectrum-adapted tight graph
wavelet and vertex-frequency frames,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 63, no. 16, pp.
4223–4235, 2015.
[26] N. Wiener, “Generalized harmonic analysis,” Acta mathematica, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 117–258, 1930.
[27] A. Papoulis and S. U. Pillai, Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. Tata McGrawHill Education, 2002.
[28] N. Wiener, Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series. MIT press Cambridge, MA, 1949, vol. 2.
[29] P. L. Combettes and J.-C. Pesquet, “Proximal splitting methods in signal processing,” in Fixed-point
algorithms for inverse problems in science and engineering. Springer, 2011, pp. 185–212.
[30] N. Komodakis and J.-C. Pesquet, “Playing with duality: An overview of recent primal? dual approaches for solving large-scale optimization problems,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 32,
no. 6, pp. 31–54, 2015.
[31] P. L. Combettes and V. R. Wajs, “Signal recovery by proximal forward-backward splitting,” Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1168–1200, 2005.
[32] A. Beck and M. Teboulle, “A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems,” SIAM journal on imaging sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 183–202, 2009.
[33] V. Heine, “Models for two-dimensional stationary stochastic processes,” Biometrika, vol. 42, no. 1-2,
pp. 170–178, 1955.
[34] A. Jain and J. Jain, “Partial differential equations and finite difference methods in image processing–
part ii: Image restoration,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 817–834,
1978.
[35] R. Chellappa and R. Kashyap, “Texture synthesis using 2-d noncausal autoregressive models,” IEEE
Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 194–203, 1985.
[36] N. L. Roux, Y. Bengio, P. Lamblin, M. Joliveau, and B. Kégl, “Learning the 2-d topology of images,”
in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2008, pp. 841–848.
[37] X. He, S. Yan, Y. Hu, P. Niyogi, and H.-J. Zhang, “Face recognition using laplacianfaces,” IEEE
transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 328–340, 2005.
[38] N. Shahid, N. Perraudin, V. Kalofolias, G. Puy, and P. Vandergheynst, “Fast robust pca on graphs,”
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 740–756, 2016.
[39] N. Perraudin, J. Paratte, D. Shuman, L. Martin, V. Kalofolias, P. Vandergheynst, and D. K. Hammond, “Gspbox: A toolbox for signal processing on graphs,” unpublished, arXiv:1408.5781, 2014.
[40] N. Perraudin, D. Shuman, G. Puy, and P. Vandergheynst, “Unlocbox a matlab convex optimization
toolbox using proximal splitting methods,” unpublished, arXiv:1402.0779, 2014.
[41] C. E. Rasmussen, “Gaussian processes in machine learning,” in Advanced lectures on machine learning. Springer, 2004, pp. 63–71.
[42] A. Chambolle, “An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications,” Journal of Mathematical imaging and vision, vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 89–97, 2004.
[43] V. Kalofolias, “How to learn a graph from smooth signals,” in Proceedings of the 19th International
Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research,
vol. 51. Cadiz: PMLR, 09–11 May 2016, pp. 920–929.
28
[44] S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory.
1993.
29
Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
| 8cs.DS
|
1
On the Easiest and Hardest Fitness Functions
Jun He, Tianshi Chen and Xin Yao,
arXiv:1203.6286v5 [cs.NE] 12 Feb 2015
Abstract
The hardness of fitness functions is an important research topic in the field of evolutionary computation. In theory, the study
can help understanding the ability of evolutionary algorithms. In practice, the study may provide a guideline to the design of
benchmarks. The aim of this paper is to answer the following research questions: Given a fitness function class, which functions
are the easiest with respect to an evolutionary algorithm? Which are the hardest? How are these functions constructed? The
paper provides theoretical answers to these questions. The easiest and hardest fitness functions are constructed for an elitist (1+1)
evolutionary algorithm to maximise a class of fitness functions with the same optima. It is demonstrated that the unimodal functions
are the easiest and deceptive functions are the hardest in terms of the time-based fitness landscape. The paper also reveals that in
a fitness function class, the easiest function to one algorithm may become the hardest to another algorithm, and vice versa.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Which fitness functions are easy for an evolutionary algorithm (EA) and which are not? This is an important research topic
in the field of evolutionary computation. In theory, the study of the hardness of fitness functions can help understanding the
ability of EAs. In practice, the study may provide a guideline to the design of benchmarks. Answers to the above questions
vary as the scope of fitness functions changes from all possible functions to a single function.
The first scenario is to consider all possible fitness functions. In this case No Free Lunch theorems [1], [2] have answered
the question. The theorems claim that the performance of any two EAs are equivalent in terms of average performance.
The second scenario is to consider a class of fitness functions with the same features, such as unimodal functions versus
multi-modal functions, or deceptive functions versus non-deceptive functions. However a multi-modal function may be easy
to solve [3]. A unimodal function may be difficult for certain EAs but easy for others [4]. A non-deceptive function may be
difficult to an EA [5], and a deceptive function may be easy [6]. Few features are available to distinguish whether a function
class is easy or hard for an EA.
The third scenario is to consider a single fitness function. A popular approach is to develop a statistic measure to predict
the hardness of a fitness function, such as fitness-distance correlation [7], fitness variance [8], and epistasis variance [9].
Unfortunately it is intractable to design a measure that can predict the hardness of a function efficiently [10], [11].
Different from the above three scenarios, an alternative scenario is considered in the current paper: given an EA and a class
of fitness functions with the same optima, which function is the hardest within the class? Which is the easiest? And how to
construct them? Here the easiest function is referred to a function on which the runtime of the EA is the shortest; and the
hardest is a function on which the runtime of the EA is the longest. Both are compared with other functions in the same class.
These questions have never rigorously been answered before.
Our research aims at understanding the hardest and easiest fitness functions within a function class, and helping design
benchmarks. The set of benchmarks usually include several typical fitness functions, for example, easy, hard and ‘averagely
hard’ functions in the class. An EA has the best performance on the easiest function, and the worst performance on the hardest
function. We will focus on these two extreme cases in this paper.
The paper is organised as follows: Section II describes related work. Section III defines the easiest and hardest fitness
functions, and establishes criteria of determining whether a function is the easiest or the hardest. Section IV constructs
the easiest and hardest functions. Section V discusses the mutual transformation between the easiest and hardest functions.
Section VI concludes the paper.
II. R ELATED W ORK
The hardness of fitness functions (or called problem difficulty) has been studied over two decades. Normally a fitness
function is said to be easy to an EA if the runtime is polynomial on the function or hard if the runtime is exponential. How
to characterize which fitness functions are easy or hard was thought to be a major challenge [10].
One approach is to link features of a fitness landscape to the hardness of fitness functions. Several features have been
investigated, for example, isolation, deception and multi-modality, ruggedness and neutrality. A fitness landscape with isolation
is hard for EAs, but other characteristics may not be related too much to the hardness of fitness functions [10]. A fully
This work was supported by the EPSRC under Grant Nos. EP/I009809/1 and EP/I010297/1. Xin Yao was supported by a Royal Society Wolfson Research
Merit Award and also by the NSFC under Grant No. 61329302. Tianshi Chen was supported by the NSFC under Grant Nos. 61100163 and 61221062.
Jun He is with Department of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB, UK.
Tianshi Chen is with State Key Laboratory of Computer Architecture, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190,
China.
Xin Yao is with CERCIA, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
2
non-deceptive function may be difficult for an EA [5] but some deceptive functions can be solved easily by an EA [6]. Some
multi-modal functions may be easy to solve [3], but the unimodal function like the ‘long path’ problem [3] could be difficult
for certain EAs [4]. Few features are universally useful to distinguish between hard and easy fitness functions.
Another approach is to predict the hardness of a fitness function through a statistic measure. Many measures are proposed,
for example, fitness-distance correlation [7], correlation length and operator correlation [12], fitness variance [8], and epistasis
variance [9]. Nevertheless, to compute the exact value of such measures usually is exponential in the problem size due to the
fact that the search space is exponentially large [10], [11], [13]. Inherent flaws also exist in the common hardness measures
such as epistasis variance, fitness-distance correlation and epistasis correlation [14].
An alternative theoretical approach is based on fitness levels. Hard fitness functions are classified into two types: ‘wide gap’
problems and ‘long path’ problems [15], [16]. For the ‘wide gap’ type, the EA is trapped at a fitness level, because there is a
wide gap between that fitness level and higher fitness levels. For the ‘long-path’ type, the EA has to take a long path to reach
an optimum. The behavior of EAs on these two problems are different [17], [18].
The research in the current paper is totally different from previous work. The hardest and easiest functions are compared
with other fitness functions within the same function class. The hardest function are not relevant to exponential runtime and
the easiest fitness functions are not relevant to polynomial runtime. For some function class, an EA only needs polynomial
time on the hardest function. For some other function class, an EA may take exponential time on the easiest function.
Our study is also different from No Free Lunch theorems [1], [2], which state that any two EAs are equivalent when their
performance is averaged across all possible fitness functions. We don’t intend to investigate the easiest and hardest functions
among all possible fitness functions, instead only within a class of fitness functions with the same optima.
III. E ASIEST AND H ARDEST F ITNESS F UNCTIONS
In this section we define the easiest and hardest fitness functions in a function class and establish the criteria to determine
whether a function is the easiest or hardest.
A. Definition of Easiest and Hardest Fitness Functions
Consider the problem of maximizing a class of fitness functions with the same optima. An instance of the problem is to
maximize a fitness function f (x):
max{f (x); x ∈ S},
(1)
where S is a finite set. The optimal set is denoted by Sopt and the non-optimal set by Snon . Without loss of generality, the
function f (x) takes L + 1 finite values f0 > f1 > · · · > fL (called fitness levels). Corresponding to fitness levels, the set S is
decomposed into L + 1 subsets:
Sl := {x | f (x) = fl }, l = 0, 1, · · · , L.
For simplicity of analysis, we only investigate strictly elitist (1+1) EAs. Using strictly elitist selection, the parent is replaced
by the child only when the child is fitter. Therefore the best found solution is always preserved. In the EAs, mutation is
independent of the fitness function. Both mutation and selection operators are time invariant (i.e., static). The procedure of
such an elitist (1+1) EA is described as follows.
1: input: fitness function f (x);
2: generate a solution at random and denote it by φ0 ;
3: generation counter t ← 0;
4: while the maximum value of f (x) is not found do
5:
child φt.m ← is mutated from parent φt ;
6:
if f (φt.m ) > f (φt ) then
7:
next generation parent φt+1 ← φt.m ;
8:
else
9:
next generation parent φt+1 ← φt ;
10:
end if
11:
t ← t + 1;
12: end while
13: output: the maximal value of f (x).
Let G(x) denote the expected number of generations for an EA to find an optimal solution for the first time when starting at
x (called expected hitting time). In (1+1) EAs, G(x) also represents the expected number of fitness evaluations (called expected
runtime). In this paper, we restrict our discussion to those EAs whose expected runtime is finite (convergent).
Definition 1: Given an EA for maximising a class of fitness functions with the same optima, a function f (x) in the class is
said to be the easiest to the EA if starting from any initial point, the runtime of the EA for maximising f (x) is no more than
the runtime for maximising any fitness function g(x) in the class when starting from the same initial point. A function f (x)
3
in the class is said to be the hardiest to the EA if starting from any initial point, the runtime of the EA for maximising f (x)
is no less than the runtime for maximising any fitness function g(x) in the class when starting from the same initial point.
The definition of the easiest and hardest functions is based on a point-by-point comparison of the runtime of the EA on two
fitness functions. It is irrelevant to polynomial or exponential runtime. The easiest and hardest functions are not unique. This
will be demonstrated in Subsection IV-C.
B. Criterion for Determining Easiest Function
Before we establish the criterion, we apply drift analysis to the random sequence {φt , t = 0, 1, · · · } and draw several
preliminary results. Notice that each generation of the (1+1) EA consists of two steps: mutation and selection,
selection
mutation
φt −→ φt.m with φt −→ φt+1 .
The mutation operator is a transition from φt to φt.m , whose transition probabilities are represented by
P [m] (x, y) := P (φt.m = y | φt = x), x, y ∈ S.
(2)
Here φ is a random variable and x its value.
The selection operator is another transition from φt and φt.m to φt+1 , whose transition probabilities are represented by
P [s] (x, y; z) := P (φt+1 = z | φt = x, φt.m = y), x, y, z ∈ S.
The tth generation is a transition from φt to φt+1 , whose transition probabilities are represented by
P (x, z) := P (φt+1 = z | φt = x).
(3)
In drift analysis, a function d(x) is called a drift function if it is non-negative at any point and equals to 0 at any optimum.
Given a drift function d(x), drift represents the progress rate of moving towards the optima per generation. Drift at point x is
defined by
X
∆(x) :=
P (x, y)(d(x) − d(y)).
y∈S
+
−
Define positive drift ∆ (x) and negative drift ∆ (x) as follows
X
P (x, y)(d(x) − d(y)),
∆+ (x) =
y:d(x)>d(y)
−
∆ (x) =
X
P (x, y)(d(x) − d(y)).
y:d(x)<d(y)
Then the drift ∆(x) = ∆+ (x) + ∆− (x).
Using drift analysis [19], we obtain the following preliminary results.
Lemma 1: [19, Lemma 1] If the drift satisfies that ∆(x) ≥ 1 for any non-optimal point x, then the expected runtime
satisfies that G(x) ≤ d(x) for any point x.
Lemma 2: [19, Lemma 2] If the drift satisfies that ∆(x) ≤ 1 for any non-optimal point x, then the expected runtime
satisfies that G(x) ≥ d(x) for any point x.
Lemma 3: [19, Lemma 3] Let the drift function d(x) = G(x), then the drift satisfies ∆(x) = 1 for any non-optimal point
x.
Furthermore, the runtime of an elitist (1+1) EA can be explicitly expressed in transition probabilities.
Lemma 4: [16, Theorem 4] For any elitist (1+1) EA, its expected runtime is given by
x = S0 .
0, Pl−1 P
1+
P
(x,y)G(y)
G(x) =
y∈Sk
Pk=0
, x ∈ Sl , l > 0.
l−1 P
k=0
y∈Sk
P (x,y)
Using the above lemmas, we establish a criterion of determining whether a fitness function is the easiest to an elitist (1+1)
EA.
Theorem 1: Given an elitist (1+1) EA, and a class of fitness functions with the same optima, let Gf (x) denote the runtime
of the (1+1) EA for maximising f (x). If the following monotonically decreasing condition holds:
• for any two points x and y such that Gf (x) < Gf (y), it has f (x) > f (y),
then f (x) is the easiest in the fitness function class.
Proof: Let g(x) be a fitness function in the function class. {φt , t = 1, 2, · · · } denotes the sequence for maximising f (x),
and {ψt , t = 1, 2, · · · } the sequence for maximising g(x). Let Gg (x) denote the runtime of the (1+1) EA for maximising g(x).
Since our objective is to show the expected runtime on f (x) is no more than the runtime on any other function, we take
the runtime on f (x) as the drift function: d(x) = Gf (x). This plays a crucial role in our analysis.
4
For the sequence {φt }, denote the drift at point x by ∆φ (x). For the sequence {ψt }, denote the drift at point x by ∆ψ (x).
The subscripts φ and ψ are used to distinguish between the two sequences {φt } and {ψt }.
Notice that d(x) = Gf (x), then we apply Lemma 3 and get that for any non-optimal point x, drift
∆φ (x) = 1.
(4)
The rest of proof is based on the idea: first, we prove the drift ∆ψ (x) ≤ 1 for the sequence {ψt }, and then draw the derived
conclusion using Lemma 2.
(1) First we compare the negative drift of the two sequences. In the case of negative drift, we consider two points x and y
such that d(x) < d(y) (i.e., Gf (x) < Gf (y)). According to the monotonically decreasing condition, f (x) > f (y).
For the sequence {φt }, y is never accepted due to elitist section, which leads to Pφ (x, y) = 0. Thus for the sequence {φt },
there is no negative drift.
∆−
φ (x) = 0.
For the sequence {ψt }, there exist two cases: (i) g(x) < g(y); (ii) g(x) ≥ g(y). In the case of g(x) < g(y), y will be
accepted, which implies Pψ (x, y) ≥ 0. Thus there exists negative drift for the sequence {ψt }.
∆−
ψ (x) ≤ 0.
Comparing the negative drift of these two sequences, we get
−
∆−
ψ (x) ≤ ∆φ (x).
(5)
(2) Secondly we compare the positive drift of the two sequences. In the case of positive drift, we consider two points x and
y such that d(x) > d(y). If y is not an optimum, then according to the monotonically decreasing condition, f (x) < f (y). If
y is an optimum, then naturally f (x) < f (y).
For the sequence {φt }, if such a y has been mutated from x, then y is always accepted due to elitist selection. Thus
Pφ (x, y) = P [m] (x, y).
For the sequence {ψt }, there exist two cases: (i) g(x) < g(y); (ii) or g(x) ≥ g(y). In the case of g(x) < g(y), according
to elitist section, y is always accepted. Thus
Pψ (x, y) = P [m] (x, y).
In the case of g(x) ≥ g(y), according to elitist section, y will not be accepted. The transition probability Pψ (x, y) = 0.
Then we get that Pφ (x, y) ≥ Pψ (x, y). Hence
X
Pψ (x, y)(d(x) − d(y))
y:d(x)>d(y)
≤
X
Pφ (x, y)(d(x) − d(y)).
y:d(x)>d(y)
So the positive drift of the two sequences satisfies
+
∆+
ψ (x) ≤ ∆φ (x).
(6)
Merging (5) and (6) and using (4), we know that the total drift of the two sequences satisfies
∆ψ (x) ≤ ∆φ (x) = 1.
Applying Lemma 2, we see the expected runtime on g(x) satisfies
Gg (x) ≥ d(x) = Gf (x),
then we finish the proof.
Now we give an intuitive explanation of the above theorem. The monotonically decreasing condition means the function is
unimodal in terms of the time-based fitness landscape and Theorem 1 asserts that a unimodal function is always the easiest.
In the following we explain this in detail.
In a time-based fitness landscape, runtime G(x) is regarded as the distance d(x) between a point x and the optimum. It is
completely different from a neighbourhood-based distance such as the Hamming distance. Time is seldom used as a distance
measure in evolutionary computation but popular in our real life. Taking runtime as the distance, we visualise the monotonically
decreasing condition
• for any two points x and y such that d(x) < d(y), it has f (x) > f (y),
using a time-based fitness landscape (see Fig. 1), where the x axis is the runtime and the y axis is the fitness, and the origin
represents the set of optima with d(x) = 0.
5
f (x)
d(x)
Fig. 1. A unimodal time-based fitness landscape. The x axis is the runtime: d(x) = G(x). The y axis is the fitness function. The origin represents the
optimum.
The landscape is unimodal: the function f (x) has exactly one optimum. In contrast, any unimodal function defined in the
2-D time-based fitness landscape will satisfy the monotonically decreasing condition. The unimodal property implies that no
negative drift exists in an elitist EA. Thus the EA always moves towards the optimum. This makes the unimodal time-based
fitness landscapes the easiest to the EA.
The theorem only states that a unimodal time-based fitness landscape is the easiest. Nevertheless this assertion could not be
established if using a neighbourhood-based distance such as the Hamming distance. A unimodal function in the context of a
neighbourhood-based fitness landscape is not always the easiest.
C. Criterion of Determining Hardest Function
In a similar way, we establish a criterion of determining whether a fitness function is the hardest to an elitist (1+1) EA. It
is similar to Theorem 1. The monotonically decreasing condition is replaced by the monotonically increasing condition.
Theorem 2: Given an elitist (1+1) EA, and a class of fitness functions with the same optima, let Gf (x) denote the expected
runtime for maximising f (x). If the following monotonically increasing condition holds:
• for any two non-optimal points x and y such that Gf (x) < Gf (y), it has f (x) < f (y),
then f (x) is the hardest in the class.
Proof: The proof is similar to that of Theorem 1 but with several changes.
Let g(x) be a fitness function in the function class. {φt , t = 1, 2, · · · } denotes the sequence for maximising f (x), and
{ψt , t = 1, 2, · · · } the sequence for maximising g(x). Gg (x) denotes the runtime of the (1+1) EA for maximising g(x). We
take the runtime on f (x) as the drift function: d(x) = Gf (x).
For the sequence {φt }, notice that d(x) = Gf (x), then we apply Lemma 3 and get for any non-optimal point x
∆φ (x) = 1.
(7)
(1) First we compare the negative drift of the two sequences. We consider two non-optimal points x and y such that
d(x) < d(y) (i.e., Gf (x) < Gf (y)). According to the monotonically increasing condition, f (x) < f (y).
For the sequence {φt }, if such a y has been mutated from x, then y is always accepted due to elitist selection. Thus
Pφ (x, y) = P [m] (x, y).
For the sequence {ψt }, there exist two cases: (i) g(x) < g(y); (ii) or g(x) ≥ g(y). In the case of g(x) < g(y), if such a y
has been mutated from x, then y is always accepted due to elitist selection. Thus
Pψ (x, y) = P [m] (x, y).
In the case of g(x) ≥ g(y), according to elitist section, y will not be accepted. The probability Pψ (x, y) equals to
Pψ (x, y) = 0.
Then we get that Pφ (x, y) ≥ Pψ (x, y). Hence
X
Pψ (x, y)(d(x) − d(y))
y:d(x)<d(y)
≥
X
y:d(x)<d(y)
Pφ (x, y)(d(x) − d(y)).
(8)
6
Equivalently the negative drift of the two sequences satisfies
−
∆−
ψ (x) ≥ ∆φ (x).
(9)
(2) Secondly we compare the positive drift of the two sequences. We consider two points x and y such that d(x) > d(y),
where y could be either an optimum or not.
First consider y an optimum. For the sequence {φt }, if such a y has been mutated from x, then y is always accepted due
to elitist selection. Thus
Pφ (x, y) = P [m] (x, y).
Similarly for the sequence {ψt }, y is always accepted due to elitist selection. Thus
Pψ (x, y) = P [m] (x, y).
Then we get
Pψ (x, y) = Pφ (x, y).
(10)
Then consider y not an optimum. According to the monotonically increasing condition, f (x) > f (y) if y is not an optimum.
For the sequence {φt }, y is never accepted due to elitist section, which leads to
Pφ (x, y) = 0.
For the sequence {ψt }, even if f (x) > f (y), it is still possible that g(x) < g(y). So y may be accepted. This means
Pψ (x, y) ≥ 0.
Thus we have
Pψ (x, y) ≥ Pφ (x, y).
(11)
Combining (10) and (11), we have for any y,
Pψ (x, y) ≥ Pφ (x, y).
Then
X
Pψ (x, y)(d(x) − d(y))
y:d(x)>d(y)
≥
X
Pφ (x, y)(d(x) − d(y)).
(12)
y:d(x)>d(y)
Equivalently the positive drift of the two sequences satisfies
+
∆+
ψ (x) ≥ ∆φ (x).
(13)
Merging (9) and (13) and using (7), we draw that the total drift of the two sequences satisfies
∆ψ (x) ≥ ∆φ (x) = 1.
It follows from Lemma 1 that for any non-optimal point x
Gg (x) ≤ d(x) = Gf (x),
then we finish the proof.
An intuitive explanation of the above theorem is that the monotonically increasing condition means the function is deceptive
and Theorem 2 states a deceptive function is always the hardest. Let’s demonstrate this using the time-based fitness landscape.
Still taking runtime G(x) as the distance d(x) to the optima, we visualise the monotonically increasing condition
• for any two non-optimal points x and y such that d(x) < d(y), it has f (x) < f (y),
using a time-based fitness landscape (see Fig. 2). The landscape is deceptive: the closer a point is to the origin, the lower its
fitness is. The deceptive time-based fitness landscape is the hardest.
When using a neighbourhood-based distance, it is impossible to establish a similar result under a similar condition. A
deceptive function in the context of the neighbourhood-based fitness landscape is not always the hardest.
Note: the above unimodal and deceptive time-based fitness landscapes are different from the easy and hard fitness landscapes
described in [20], which are classified by polynomial or exponential hitting time.
7
f (x)
d(x)
Fig. 2. A deceptive time-based fitness landscape. The x axis is the runtime: d(x) = G(x). The y axis is the fitness function. Th origin represents the
optimum.
D. Case Study: 0-1 Knapsack Problem
We give two simple examples to show the application of the above theorems. The examples come from the 0-1 knapsack
problem. We will not consider all instances of the 0-1 knapsack problem. Instead we focus on an instance class.
Example 1: Consider an instance class of the 0-1 knapsack problem described as follows:
Pn
maximize fP(x) = i=1 vi xi ,
n
subject to
i=1 wi xi ≤ C,
where vi > 0 is the value of item i, wi > 0 its weight, and C the knapsack capacity. The value of items satisfies v1 >
v2 + · · · + vn , and the weight of items satisfies w1 > w2 + · · · + wn , the knapsack capacity C = w1 . A solution is represented
by a binary string x = (x1 · · · xn ). The unique optimum is (10 · · · 0), denoted by x∗ .
An elitist (1+1) EA using bitwise mutation is applied to the problem.
1
1
• EA( n ). Flip each bit independently with flipping probability n .
For simplicity of analysis, we adopt the simplest approach to handle the constraint: reject any infeasible solution during
selection.
Let’s investigate a special instance in the class: v1 = n and v2 = · · · = vn = 1; w1 = n and w2 = · · · = wn = 1. Notice
that the global optimum is x∗ := (10 · · · 0) and the local optimum is (01 · · · 1). It is a deceptive function. We can prove the
monotonically increasing condition holds. We give an outline of the proof but omit its detailed calculation. Corresponding to
fitness level fl , the subset
S0 = {x∗ }, and f0 = n,
Sl = {x | h(x, x∗ ) = n − l}, and fl = n − l,
for l > 0,
where h(x, y) is the Hamming distance between x and y.
According to Lemma 4, the expected runtime of EA( n1 ) is given by the following recurrence relation: G(x) = 0 for x ∈ S0
and
Pl−1 P
1 + k=0 y∈Sk P (x, y)G(y)
G(x) =
, x ∈ Sl ,
Pl−1 P
k=0
y∈Sk P (x, y)
where
P (x, y) = P
[m]
n−h(x,y) h(x,y)
1
1
.
(x, y) = 1 −
n
n
Then the monotonically increasing condition holds.
G(x) < G(y) =⇒ f (x) < f (y),
x, y ∈ Snon .
Applying Theorem 2, we know the fitness function related to this instance is the hardiest in the class.
Example 2: Consider an instance class of the 0-1 knapsack problem. The knapsack capacity C is enough large such that
C ≥ w1 + · · · + wn . The unique optimum is (1 · · · 1). This function class is equivalent to linear functions. We apply EA( n1 )
to the problem.
Let’s investigate a special instance in the class: v1 = · · · = vn = 1. Its fitness function is equivalent to the OneMax function,
so that it is easy. We prove the OneMax function is the easiest through verifying the monotonically decreasing condition. We
give an outline of the proof. Corresponding to fitness level fl where l = 0, · · · , n, the subset
Sl = {x | h(x, ~1) = l},
and fl = n − l,
8
where h(x, y) is the Hamming distance between x and y.
According to Lemma 4, the expected runtime of EA( n1 ) is given by the following recurrence relation: G(x) = 0 for x ∈ S0
and for l > 0
Pl−1 P
1 + k=0 y∈Sk P (x, y)G(y)
G(x) =
, x ∈ Sl ,
Pl−1 P
k=0
y∈Sk P (x, y)
where
P (x, y) = P
[m]
n−h(x,y) h(x,y)
1
1
(x, y) = 1 −
.
n
n
Then the monotonically decreasing condition holds.
G(x) < G(y) =⇒ f (x) > f (y),
x, y ∈ S.
Applying Theorem 1, we get the OneMax function is the easiest among all linear functions.
Note: The monotonically increasing condition is a sufficient condition for a fitness function being the hardest, but not
necessary. The same is true to the monotonically decreasing condition of the easiest functions. The reason is trivial: Consider
a function class only includes one function, then the function will be both the easiest and hardest in the class, regardless of
the monotonically increasing or decreasing condition.
IV. C ONSTRUCTION
OF
E ASIEST AND H ARDEST F ITNESS F UNCTIONS
TO AN
EA
In this section we construct unimodal functions (the easiest) and deceptive functions (the hardest), respectively, to any given
elitist (1+1) EA.
A. Construction of Easiest Fitness Functions
Given a class consisting of all fitness functions with the same optima on a finite set S, consider an elitist (1+1) EA for
maximising a fitness function in the class. We construct the easiest function f (x) to the EA as follows.
1) Let S0 = Sopt . For any x ∈ S0 , define G′ (x) = 0.
2) Suppose that the subsets S0 , · · · , Sl−1 are given and G′ (x) has been defined on these subsets. Let Sl be the set consisting
of all points such that
Pl−1 P
1 + k=0 y∈Sk P [m] (x, y)G′ (y)
.
arg
min
Pl−1 P
[m] (x, y)
x∈S\∪l−1
S
k=0 k
k=0
y∈Sk P
For any x ∈ Sl , define
′
G (x) =
1+
Pl−1 P
k=0
y∈Sk
Pl−1 P
k=0
P [m] (x, y)G′ (y)
y∈Sk
P [m] (x, y)
.
(14)
The value of G′ (x) is the same for any point x in the same subset.
3) Repeat the above step until any point is covered by a subset. Then there exists some integer L > 0 and S = ∪L
k=0 Sk .
4) Choose L + 1 numbers f0 , · · · , fL such that f0 > · · · > fL . Set a fitness function f (x) as follows: f (x) = fk , for
x ∈ Sk .
The following theorem shows that the fitness function constructed above is the easiest to the EA. The proof is a direct
application of the monotonically decreasing condition.
Theorem 3: f (x) is the easiest function in the function class with respect to the EA.
Proof: (1) We show that G′ (x) equals to the expected runtime G(x).
According to Lemma 4, the expected runtime G(x) = 0 for x ∈ S0 and for l > 0
Pl−1 P
1 + k=0 y∈Sk P (x, y)G(y)
,
x ∈ Sl .
(15)
G(x) =
Pl−1 P
k=0
y∈Sk P (x, y)
For any x ∈ Sk and y ∈ Sl where k > l, since f (x) = fk < f (y) = fl and the EA adopts elitist selection, y is always
accepted if it has been generated via mutation. Thus the transition probability P (x, y) equals to P [m] (x, y). (15) equals to
Pl−1 P
1 + k=0 y∈Sk P [m] (x, y)G(y)
G(x) =
,
x ∈ Sl .
(16)
Pl−1 P
[m] (x, y)
k=0
y∈Sk P
Comparing it with (14), G(x) and G′ (x) are identical.
(2) We prove the monotonically decreasing condition.
9
First we prove an inequality:
G(x) > G(y),
x ∈ Sl+1 , y ∈ Sl .
(17)
We prove it by induction. For any x ∈ S1 , y ∈ S0 , it is trivial that G(x) > G(y) = 0. Suppose that for any x ∈ Sl ,
y ∈ Sl−1 , it holds G(x) > G(y). We prove that for any x ∈ Sl+1 , y ∈ Sl , it holds G(x) > G(y).
Since y ∈ Sl , from the construction, we know that
Pl−1 P
1 + k=0 z∈Sk P [m] (w, z)G(z)
G(y) =
min
.
Pl−1 P
l−1
[m] (w, z)
w∈S\∪k=0
Sk
k=0
z∈Sk P
Let w = x, then we get
G(y) ≤
1+
Pl−1 P
k=0
x∈Sk
Pl−1 P
k=0
Equivalently
G(y)
l−1 X
X
P
[m]
z∈Sk
P [m] (x, z)
l−1 X
X
(x, z) ≤ 1 +
.
P [m] (x, z)G(z).
k=0 z∈Sk
k=0 z∈Sk
P
P [m] (x, z)G(z)
[m]
We add the term z∈Sl P (x, z)G(z) to both sides. Notice that G(z) = G(y) for z ∈ Sl . As to the left-hand side, we
replace the factor G(z) by G(y) and move it outside of the summation. Then we get
G(y)
l X
X
l X
X
P [m] (x, z) ≤ 1 +
k=0 z∈Sk
k=0 z∈Sk
Equivalently
G(y) ≤
1+
Since x ∈ Sl+1 , it follows from (16)
G(x) =
P [m] (x, z)G(z).
1+
Pl
P
P
z∈Sk
P [m] (x, z)
Pl
P
z∈Sk
P [m] (x, z)G(z)
k=0
Pl
k=0
k=0
Pl
k=0
z∈Sk
P
z∈Sk
P [m] (x, z)G(z)
P [m] (x, z)
.
.
So we get G(y) ≤ G(x). The inequality is strict since x and y are in different subsets. Thus we prove (17).
Secondly using (17), we can infer the monotonically decreasing condition easily. From (17), we draw that
G(x) > G(y),
if x ∈ Sl , y ∈ Sk with l > k.
(18)
For any two points x and y such that G(x) > G(y), let x ∈ Sk , y ∈ Sl . Then k and l must satisfy k < l. Then we have
f (x) = fk < f (y) = fl . This proves the monotonically decreasing condition.
(3) The conclusion is drawn from Theorem 1.
The above theorem provides an approach to designing the easiest fitness functions in the function class. The idea behind
the construction procedure is simple: we construct a function which is unimodal in the time-based fitness landscape and then
it is the easiest. Notice that the number of the easiest functions is infinite since the potential values of each fl are infinite.
B. Construction of Hardest Fitness Functions
We consider an elitist (1+1) EA and a class of fitness functions with the same optima. The hardest fitness function f (x) in
this class is constructed as follows.
1) Let S0 = Sopt . For any x ∈ S0 , let G′ (x) = 0.
2) Suppose that the subsets S0 , · · · , Sl−1 have been produced and G(x) have been defined on these subsets. Then define
Sl to be the set of all points such that
Pl−1 P
[m]
1 + k=0
(x, y)G′ (y)
y∈Sk P
.
arg
max
P
P
l−1
[m] (x, y)
x∈S\∪l−1
S
k=0 k
k=0
y∈Sk P
For any x ∈ Sl , set
′
G (x) =
1+
Pl−1 P
k=0
y∈Sk
Pl−1 P
k=0
P [m] (x, y)G′ (y)
y∈Sk
P [m] (x, y)
.
(19)
3) Repeat the above step until any point is covered by a subset. Then there exists an integer L > 0 such that S = ∪L
k=0 Sk .
10
4) Choose L + 1 number f0 , · · · , fL such that f0 > · · · > fL > 0. Set the fitness function to be f (x) = fk , x ∈ Sk .
Now we prove that f (x) is the hardest fitness function in the class using the monotonically increasing condition.
Theorem 4: f (x) is the hardest function in the function class to the EA.
Proof: (1) We prove that the mean runtime G(x) = G′ (x). The proof is similar to the first step in the proof of Theorem 3.
(2) We prove the monotonically increasing condition. The proof is similar to the second step in the proof of Theorem 3.
(3) The conclusion is drawn from Theorem 2.
The above theorem provides an approach to designing the hardest fitness functions in the class. We construct a function
which is deceptive in the time-based fitness landscape and then it is the hardest.
In the construction of the easiest and hardest functions, we don’t restrict the representation of fitness functions. However,
the current approach is not suitable for the fitness function class with a specific requirement, for example, all fitness functions
in the class must be linear or quadratic. This research issue is left for future studies.
C. Case Study: Benchmarks in Pseudo-Boolean Optimisation
So far we have introduced a general approach to constructing the easiest and hardest fitness functions. Now we illustrate
an application in pseudo-Boolean optimisation: to design benchmarks within a fitness function class. According to No Free
Lunch theorems, the performance of two EAs are equivalent if averaged over all possible Boolean-valued fitness functions.
Therefore we only consider a fitness class.
Example 3: Consider the class of all pseudo-Boolean functions with the same optima at ~0 := (0 · · · 0) and ~1 := (1 · · · 1).
max{f (x); x ∈ {0, 1}n}.
(20)
We compare the performance of two (1+1) elitist EAs on this problem using different mutation rates.
1) EA( n1 ). Flip each bit independently with flipping probability n1 . The mutation probability from x to y is
n−h(x,y) h(x,y)
1
1
,
P [m] (x, y) = 1 −
n
n
where h(x, y) denote the Hamming distance between x and y.
2) EA( 12 ). Flip each bit independently with flipping probability 12 . The mutation probability from x to y is
n
1
P [m] (x, y) =
.
2
(21)
(22)
As to benchmark functions, their optima must be known in advance and the number of benchmarks is often between 5
to 30. Since a function class normally includes a large amount of functions, a question is which functions should be chosen
as benchmarks? Naturally we prefer typical functions in the class: easy, hard and ‘averagely hard’ functions. Here we only
consider how to design the easiest and hardest fitness functions.
The easiest fitness function to EA( n1 ) is constructed as follows.
1) Let S0 = {~0, ~1}. For any x ∈ S0 , define G(x) = 0.
2) Suppose that the subsets S0 , · · · , Sl−1 are given and G(x) has been defined on these subsets. Let Sl be the set consisting
of all points such that
Pl−1 P
1 + k=0 y∈Sk P [m] (x, y)G(y)
.
(23)
arg
min
Pl−1 P
[m] (x, y)
x∈S\∪l−1
S
k=0 k
k=0
y∈Sk P
Using the mutation probability
P [m] (x, y) =
we get
n−h(x,y) h(x,y)
1
1
,
1−
n
n
Sl = {x | min{h(x, ~0), h(x, ~1)} = l}.
For any x ∈ Sl , define
G(x) =
1+
Pl−1 P
k=0
Pl−1
k=0
y∈Sk
P
y∈Sk
P [m] (x, y)G(y)
P [m] (x, y)
.
(24)
3) Repeat the above step until any point is covered by a subset. The last subset is SL where L := n/2. Without loss of
generality, assume n is even.
4) Choose L + 1 numbers f0 , · · · , fL such that f0 > · · · > fL . Set the fitness function f (x) = fl , for x ∈ Sl . Then f (x)
is the easiest function in the function class.
11
An example of the easiest function to EA( n1 ) is the Two Max function, given by
f (x) = n − min{h(x, ~0), h(x, ~1)}.
(25)
The runtime is calculated as follows. Let x ∈ Sl , without loss of generality, suppose it has l 0-valued bits and n − l 1-valued
bits (with l ≤ n − l). The event of going from the fitness level fl to a higher fitness level will happen if one of 0-valued bits
is flipped and other bits are kept unchanged. The probability of this event is at least
n−1
1
l
l 1
1−
≥
,
n
ne
1 n
where e is Euler’s constant. Thus the runtime of going from the fitness level fl to a higher fitness level is no more than
Since the number of fitness levels is L, therefore the total runtime to reach the global optima is at most
L
X
en
l=1
l
en
l .
= O(n ln n).
There are infinite easiest fitness functions, including linear, quadratic and other non-linear functions, for example,
k
f (x) = n − min{h(x, ~0), h(x, ~1)} ,
k = 1, 2, · · ·
(26)
The runtime of the EA on all easiest fitness functions is the same no matter whether they are linear or not.
It is worth noting that the Two Max function is unimodal in the time-based fitness landscape. But using the Hamming
distance, the function is two-modal due to two optima at ~0 and ~1.
The hardest fitness function to EA( n1 ) is constructed as follows.
1) Let S0 = {~0, ~1}. For any x ∈ S0 , let G(x) = 0.
2) Suppose that the subsets S0 , · · · , Sl−1 have been produced and G(x) have been defined on these subsets. Then define
Sl to be the set of all points such that
Pl−1 P
[m]
1 + k=0
(x, y)G(y)
y∈Sk P
.
arg
max
P
P
l−1
[m] (x, y)
x∈S\∪l−1
S
k=0 k
k=0
y∈Sk P
Using the mutation probability
P [m] (x, y) =
n−h(x,y) h(x,y)
1
1
1−
,
n
n
we get (let L := n/2 and assume n/2 is an integer)
Sl = {x | min{h(x, ~0), h(x, ~1)} = L − l − 1}.
For any x ∈ Sl , set
G(x) =
1+
Pl−1 P
k=0
y∈Sk
Pl−1 P
k=0
y∈Sk
P [m] (x, y)G(y)
P [m] (x, y)
.
3) Repeat the above step until any point is covered by a subset. The last subset is SL .
4) Choose L + 1 numbers f0 , · · · , fL such that f0 > · · · > fL . Set the fitness function f (x) = fl , for x ∈ Sl .
An example of the hardest function to EA( n1 ) is a Fully Deceptive function
n + 1,
if x = ~0, ~1;
f (x) =
~
~
min{h(x, 0), h(x, 1)}, otherwise.
(27)
(28)
Consider a point x ∈ S1 where x consists of exact n/2 zero-valued bits and x is the farthest from ~0 and ~1. Now we calculate
the runtime G(x). Since the Hamming distance between x and the optima ~0 and ~1 is n/2, so the transition probability of
going from x to the two optima is between
n/2 n/2
n/2 n/2
1
1
1
1
and 2 1 −
,
1−
n
n
n
n
and the runtime is Θ(nn/2 ).
There are infinite hardest fitness functions, for example, for k = 1, 2, · · ·
(
(n + 1)k ,
if x = ~0, ~1;
k
f (x) =
min{h(x, ~0), h(x, ~1)} , otherwise.
(29)
12
TABLE I
T HREE BENCHMARKS AND RUNTIME C OMPARISON OF T WO EA S .
name
Two Max
Fully Deceptive
f (x) =
function
f(x) = n − min{h(x, ~0), h(x, ~1)}
Two Needles in Haystack
time-based fitness landscape
unimodal
1
EA( n
)
O(n ln n)
EA( 21 )
Θ(2n )
deceptive
Θ(nn/2 )
Θ(2n )
isolation
nΘ(n) × Θ(1)
Θ(2n )
n + 1,
if x = ~0, ~1;
min{h(x, ~0), h(x, ~1)}, otherwise.
n
1, if x = ~0, ~1;
f (x) =
0, otherwise.
We can construct the easiest and hardest fitness functions to EA( 21 ) in the same way. The easiest fitness function to EA( 21 )
is constructed as follows.
1) Let S0 be the set of optima ~0 and ~1.
2) Let S1 be the set consisting of all points such that
x∈S\S0
Using the mutation probability
1
.
[m] (x, y)
P
y∈S0
arg min P
P [m] (x, y) = 2−n ,
we get S1 = {x | x 6= ~0, ~1}.
3) Choose 2 numbers f0 , f1 such that f0 > f1 . Set the fitness function f (x) = fl , for x ∈ Sl . Then f (x) is the easiest
function in the function class.
An example of the easiest function to EA( 21 ) is the Two Needles in the Haystack function
1, if x = ~0, ~1;
f (x) =
(30)
0, otherwise.
We calculate the runtime G(x) for x ∈ S1 as follows. The transition probability of going from x to the two optima is
between ( 12 )n and 2 × ( 12 )n . Then the runtime is Θ(2n ).
The hardest fitness function to EA( 21 ) is constructed as follows.
1) Let S0 = {~0, ~1}.
2) Let S1 be the set of all points such that
x∈S\S0
Using the mutation probability
1
.
[m] (x, y)
y∈S0 P
arg max P
P [m] (x, y) = 2−n ,
we get S1 = {x | x 6= ~0, ~1}.
3) Choose 2 numbers f0 , f1 such that f0 > f1 . Set the fitness function f (x) = fl , for x ∈ Sl . Then the above function
f (x) is the hardest to EA( 21 ).
An example of the hardest function to EA( 21 ) is the Two Needles in the Haystack function, the same as the easiest function.
The runtime is Θ(2n ). Since the runtime of EA( 12 ) on both the easiest and hardest functions is Θ(2n ). Then we know for any
function in the class, its runtime is Θ(2n ).
We have constructed three benchmark functions: Two Max, Fully Deceptive and Two Needles in the Haystack. They are
described in Table I. The three functions represent three typical fitness landscapes: unimodal, deceptive and isolation. Using
the benchmarks, we can make a fair comparison of the performance of EA( n1 ) and EA( 21 ). Table I lists the results.
The runtime of EA( n1 ) on the Two Needles in the Haystack function is calculated as follows. Suppose the initial point x
consists of Θ(n) 0-valued bits and Θ(n) 1-valued bits, then the event of going from x to the optima happens when either all
0-valued bits are flipped and other bits unchanged; or all 1-valued bits are flipped and other bits unchanged. The probability
of the event is ( n1 )Θ(n) × Θ(1). Thus the runtime is nΘ(n) × Θ(1).
From the table, we see that EA( n1 ) is better than EA( 21 ) on the Two Max function, but worse on the Fully Deceptive Points
and Two Needles in the Haystack functions. The comparison gives an understanding of the two EAs’ ability in different fitness
landscapes: unimodal, deceptive and isolation. Each EA has its own advantage. EA( n1 ) is more suitable for unimodal functions,
but EA( 12 ) performs better on deceptive or isolation functions.
The runtime of EA( n1 ) and EA( 21 ) increases exponentially fast on the Fully Deceptive and Two Needles in the Haystack
functions. Thus it will be difficult to compare the runtime of the EAs via computer experiments unless n is small.
13
V. M UTUAL T RANSFORMATION B ETWEEN THE E ASIEST AND H ARDEST F ITNESS F UNCTIONS
In the case study of the previous section, we observe that the easiest and hardest fitness functions vary as EAs change. In
this section we prove an interesting result: a fitness function that is the easiest to one elitist (1+1) EA could becomes hardest
to another elitist (1+1) EA and vice versa.
A. Easiest May Become Hardest
Consider a class consisting of all functions with the same optima. Let f (x) be the easiest to an elitist (1+1) EA (called the
original EA). Denote its fitness levels by f0 > · · · > fL and define the set Sl = {x; f (x) = fl }. We construct another elitist
(1+1) EA (called the bad EA) and show f (x) is the hardest to the bad EA.
The mutation operator in the bad EA is constructed as follows.
1) Choose L + 1 non-negative numbers m0 , m1 , · · · , mL such that m0 = 0, m1 > m2 > · · · > mL > 0.
2) For any x ∈ S0 and y ∈ S, let the mutation transition probability P [m] (x, y) be any probability.
3) For any x ∈ Sl (where l = 1, · · · , L) and y ∈ S, set the mutation transition probability P [m] (x, y) such that
Pk−1 P
1 + j=0 y∈Sj P [m] (x, y)mj
< mk ,
for k < l,
Pk−1 P
[m] (x, y)
j=0
y∈Sj P
and
1+
Pl−1 P
j=0
Pl−1 P
j=0
y∈Sj
y∈Sj
P [m] (x, y)mj
P [m] (x, y)
= ml .
(31)
The above mutation operator is determined by the subsets S1 , · · · , Sl rather than fitness levels.
The following theorem shows the function f (x) satisfies the monotonically increasing condition and then it is the hardest
to the bad EA.
Theorem 5: f (x) is the hardest function to the bad EA.
Proof: (1) We prove that the expected runtime of the bad EA G(x) = ml , for x ∈ Sl , l = 0, · · · , L.
According to Lemma 4, the expected runtime
Pl−1 P
1 + j=0
y∈Sj P (x, y)G(y)
G(x) =
.
Pl−1 P
j=0
y∈Sj P (x, y)
For any x ∈ Sl and y ∈ Sk where l > k. Since f (x) = fl < f (y) = fk and the bad EA adopts elitist selection, y is always
accepted if it has been generated via mutation. Thus the transition probability P (x, y) equals to P [m] (x, y).
The expected runtime becomes
Pl−1 P
1 + j=0 y∈Sj P [m] (x, y)G(y)
G(x) =
.
Pl−1 P
[m] (x, y)
j=0
y∈Sj P
Comparing it with (31), we obtain G(x) and ml are identical.
(2) We prove the monotonically increasing condition.
Assume that x ∈ Sl , y ∈ Sk for some l and k. If G(x) < G(y), then it is equivalent to ml < mk . Thus we have k < l and
f (x) = fl < f (x) = fk .
which gives the monotonically increasing condition.
(3) The conclusion is drawn from Theorem 2.
In the construction of the mutation operator and the proof of the above theorem, we don’t utilize the assumption of f (x)
being the easiest to the original EA. Thus the theorem can be understood more generally: for any fitness function f (x), we can
construct an elitist (1+1) EA to which f (x) is the hardest. From the theoretical viewpoint, the theorem shows the existence of
a bad EA to the easiest fitness function.
B. Hardest May Become Easiest
Let f (x) be the hardest fitness function to the original elitist (1+1) EA. We construct another elitist (1+1) EA (called the
good EA), and show f (x) becomes the easiest to the good EA.
The mutation operator in the good EA is constructed as follows.
1) Choose L + 1 non-negative numbers m0 , · · · , mL such that m0 = 0 < · · · < mL .
2) For any x ∈ S0 and y ∈ S, let the mutation transition probability P [m] (x, y) be any probability.
14
3) For any x ∈ Sl (where l = 1, · · · , L) and y ∈ S, set the mutation transition probability P [m] (x, y) such that
Pk−1 P
[m]
(x, y)mj
1 + j=0
y∈Sj P
> mk ,
for k < l,
Pk−1 P
[m]
(x, y)
j=0
y∈Sj P
and
1+
Pl−1 P
j=0
Pl−1 P
j=0
y∈Sj
y∈Sj
P [m] (x, y)mj
P [m] (x, y)
= ml .
(32)
The following theorem shows f (x) satisfies monotonically decreasing condition and then it is the easiest to the good EA.
Theorem 6: f (x) is the easiest function to the good EA.
Proof: (1) We prove that the expected runtime of the good EA G(x) = mk , for x ∈ Sk , k = 0, 1, · · · , L. The proof is
similar to the first step in the proof of Theorem 5.
(2) We prove the monotonically decreasing condition. The proof is similar to the second step in the proof of Theorem 5.
(3) The conclusion is drawn from Theorem 1.
In the construction of the mutation operator and the proof of the above theorem, we also don’t utilize the assumption of
f (x) being the hardest to the original EA. The theorem implies that for any fitness function f (x), we can construct a good
(1+1) EA to which f (x) is the easiest.
The above theorem reveals if a fitness function is the hardest to one EA, then it is possible to design another good EA to
which the function is the easiest. However, the above construction method is intractable in practice since the complexity of
construction is exponential. How to design such a good EA is an ultimate goal in the study of EAs but beyond the scope of
the current paper.
Theorems 5 and 6 can be viewed as a complement to No Free Lunch theorems. No Free Lunch theorems concern all potential
fitness functions. The theorems claim the performance of any two EAs are equivalent if averaged over all possible functions.
Theorems 5 and 6 concern the hardness of a single fitness function. The two theorems assert that a fitness function could be
the easiest to one elitist (1+1) EA but the hardest to another EA. This implies for a single fitness function, a good EA (but
also a bad EA) always exists.
VI. C ONCLUSIONS
AND
F UTURE W ORK
This paper presents a rigorous analysis devoted to the easiest and hardest fitness functions with respect to any given elitist
(1+1) EA for maximising a class of fitness functions with the same optima. Such fitness functions have been constructed step
by step. It is demonstrated that the unimodal functions are the easiest and deceptive functions are the hardest in terms of
the time-based fitness landscape. Furthermore it reveals that the hardest (and easiest) functions may become the easiest (and
hardest) with respect to another elitist (1+1) EA. From the theoretical viewpoint, a good EA (but also a bad EA) always exists
for a single fitness function.
A potential application of the theoretical work is the design of benchmarks. Benchmarks play an essential role in the empirical
comparison of EAs. In order to make a fair comparison, a good practice is to choose typical fitness functions in benchmarks,
for example, several easy, hard and ‘averagely hard’ fitness functions. Our work provides a theoretical guideline to the design
of easy and hard functions: to choose unimodal (the easiest) and deceptive (the hardest) fitness functions with respect to EAs
under comparison.
Another application is to understand the ability of EAs on a class of fitness functions with the same optima. Through the
comparison of EAs on the easiest and hardest fitness functions, our work helps understand the ability of EAs in unimodal and
deceptive time-based fitness landscapes. This has been shown in the second case study.
Non-elitist EAs, population-based EAs and dynamical EAs are not investigated in this paper. The extension of our work to
such EAs will be the future research. Another work in the future is to study how to construct the easiest and hardest fitness
functions such that a special requirement, for example, all fitness functions must be linear or quadratic.
R EFERENCES
[1] D. H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready, “No free lunch theorems for optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.
67–82, 1997.
[2] ——, “Coevolutionary free lunches,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 721–735, 2005.
[3] J. Horn and D. E. Goldberg, “Genetic algorithms difficulty and the modality of fitness landscapes,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Foundations
of Genetic Algorithms, L. D. Whitley and M. D. Vose, Eds. Morgan Kauffman, 1995, pp. 243–269.
[4] G. Rudolph, “How mutation and selection solve long path problems in polynomial expected time,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 207–211,
1996.
[5] M. D. Vose and A. H. Wright, “Stability of vertex fixed points and applications,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Foundations of Genetic
Algorithms, L. D. Whitley and M. D. Vose, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995, pp. 103–114.
[6] S. W. Wilson, “GA-easy does not imply steepest-ascent optimizable,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, R. K.
Belew and L. B. Booker, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991, pp. 85–89.
15
[7] T. Jones and S. Forrest, “Fitness distance correlation as a measure of problem difficulty for genetic algorithms.” in Proceedings of the 6th International
Conference on Genetic Algorithms, L. J. Eshelman, Ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995, pp. 184–192.
[8] N. J. Radcliffe and P. D. Surry, “Fitness variance of formulae and performance prediction,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Foundations of
Genetic Algorithms, L. D. Whitley and M. D. Vose, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995, pp. 51–72.
[9] Y. Davidor, “Epistasis variance: A viewpoint on GA-hardness,” in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms., G. J. E.
Rawlins, Ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991, pp. 23–35.
[10] B. Naudts and L. Kallel, “A comparison of predictive measure of problem difficulty in evolutionary algorithms,” IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation,
vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2000.
[11] J. He, C. Reeves, C. Witt, and X. Yao, “A note on problem difficulty measures in black-box optimization: Classification, existence and predictability,”
Evolutionary Computation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 435–443, 2007.
[12] B. Manderick, M. K. de Weger, and P. Spiessens, “The genetic algorithms and the structure of the fitness landscape,” in Proceedings of the 4th
International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, R. K. Belew and L. B. Booker, Eds. Morgan Kaufman, 1991, pp. 143–150.
[13] T. Jansen, “On classifications of fitness functions,” in Theoretical Aspects of Evolutionary Computing, L. Kallel, B. Naudts, and A. Rogers, Eds. Springer,
2001, pp. 371–386.
[14] C. Reeves, “Predictive measures for problem difficulty,” in Proceedings of 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1. IEEE Press, 1999, pp.
736–743.
[15] J. He and X. Yao, “An analysis of evolutionary algorithms for finding approximation solutions to hard optimisation problems,” in Proceedings of IEEE
2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE Press, 2003, pp. 2004–2010.
[16] ——, “Towards an analytic framework for analysing the computation time of evolutionary algorithms,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 145, no. 1-2, pp.
59–97, 2003.
[17] T. Chen, J. He, G. Sun, G. Chen, and X. Yao, “A new approach for analyzing average time complexity of population-based evolutionary algorithms on
unimodal problems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1092–1106, 2009.
[18] T. Chen, J. He, G. Chen, and X. Yao., “Choosing selection pressure for wide-gap problems,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 411, no. 6, pp. 926–934,
2010.
[19] J. He and X. Yao, “A study of drift analysis for estimating computation time of evolutionary algorithms,” Natural Computing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–35,
2004.
[20] J. He, X. Yao, and Q. Zhang, “To understand one-dimensional continuous fitness landscapes by drift analysis,” in Proceedings of 2004 Congress on
Evolutionary Computation. IEEE Press, 2004, pp. 1248–1253.
| 9cs.NE
|
Presentations for (singular) partition monoids:
a new approach
James East
Centre for Research in Mathematics; School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics
arXiv:1606.07594v2 [math.GR] 27 Jun 2016
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia
J.East @ WesternSydney.edu.au
Abstract
We give new, short proofs of the presentations for the partition monoid and its singular ideal
originally given in the author’s 2011 papers in J. Alg. and I.J.A.C.
Keywords: Partition monoid, Singular ideal, Presentations.
MSC: 20M05; 20M20.
1
Introduction
Partition monoids arise in the construction of partition algebras [16, 21] as twisted semigroup algebras [14, 25]. Although the partition algebras (and other related diagram algebras) were originally
introduced in the context of theoretical physics and representation theory, their applications have
been many and varied; see for example the recent surveys [17, 22]. In particular, diagram monoids
have played an increasingly important role in semigroup theory in the last two decades; see for example [1–3, 9, 12, 18], and especially [10] for an extensive list of references. This semigroup approach
was first employed by Wilcox in the context of cellular algebras [25], and was also instrumental in
providing the first full proof [6] of a presentation (by generators and relations) for the partition algebras; the presentation was first stated in [14]. The method in [6] was to first obtain a presentation
for the partition monoid (stated in Theorem 2.2 below), and then apply a general result on twisted
semigroup algebras (which was also proved in [6]).
Taking classical work of Howie on singular transformation semigroups [15] as inspiration, the singular
ideals of partition monoids were investigated in [7], the main result being a presentation by generators
and relations (stated in Theorem 2.1 below); the generating set consists of idempotents and is of
minimal possible size. (See also [20], where a similar presentation was given for the singular part
of the Brauer monoid.) The article [7] unlocked some intriguing combinatorial properties of the
partition monoids, and paved the way for several further studies, most notably [10], which concerns
the question of (minimal) idempotent generation of arbitrary ideals in several natural families of
diagram monoids. The proofs of Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 given in [6, 7] relied on several previous
results [4,5,11,24] to obtain initial (highly complex) presentations, which were subsequently reduced
(using lengthy sequences of Tietze transformations); the articles [6, 7] have a combined length of 58
pages.
The purpose of the current article is to give shorter, more direct, and conceptually simpler proofs of
Theorems 2.1 and 2.2. Apart from quoting two results (Theorem 2.1 of [8] and Theorem 2 of [11]),
1
the current article is entirely self-contained: we give the required definitions and state the main
results in Section 2, and then prove them in Sections 3 and 4. We believe that the new, efficient
techniques for working with presentations are of independent interest, as may be the normal forms
given in Proposition 3.14.
2
Preliminaries and statement of the main results
Fix an integer n ≥ 2 (everything is trivial if n ≤ 1), and write n = {1, . . . , n} and n′ = {1′ , . . . , n′ }.
The partition monoid of degree n, denoted Pn , consists of all set partitions of n ∪ n′ , under a product
described below. Such a partition α ∈ Pn may be represented graphically. We draw vertices 1, . . . , n
on an upper row (increasing from left to right) with 1′ , . . . , n′ directly below, and add edges so
that connected components of the graph correspond to the blocks of α. For example, the partition
α = {1, 4}, {2, 3, 4′, 5′ }, {5, 6}, {1′, 3′, 6′ }, {2′} ∈ P6 is represented by the graph
.
The product of two partitions α, β ∈ Pn is calculated as follows. We first stack (graphs representing) α
and β so that lower vertices 1′ , . . . , n′ of α are identified with upper vertices 1, . . . , n of β. The
connected components of this graph are then constructed, and we finally delete the middle row; the
resulting graph is the product αβ ∈ Pn . Here is an example calculation with α, β ∈ P6 :
α=
= αβ
β=
The operation is associative, so Pn is a semigroup: in fact, a monoid, with identity 1 =
···
.
···
A block of a partition α ∈ Pn is called a transversal block if it has non-trivial intersection with both n
and n′ ; otherwise, it is a non-transversal block (which may be an upper or lower non-transversal
block, with obvious meanings). The rank of α, denoted rank(α), is the number of transversal blocks
of α. For example, α ∈ P6 as above has transversal block {2, 3, 4′, 5′ } (so rank(α) = 1), upper
non-transversal blocks {1, 4}, {5, 6}, and lower non-transversal blocks {1′ , 3′ , 6′ }, {2′ }.
For α ∈ Pn and x ∈ n ∪ n′ , we write [x]α for the block of α containing x. We then define the domain
and codomain of α to be the sets
dom(α) = {x ∈ n : [x]α ∩ n′ 6= ∅}
and
codom(α) = {x ∈ n : [x′ ]α ∩ n 6= ∅}.
We also define the kernel and cokernel of α to be the equivalences
ker(α) = (x, y) ∈ n × n : [x]α = [y]α
and
For example, with α ∈ P6 as as above,
dom(α) = {2, 3},
codom(α) = {4, 5},
coker(α) = (x, y) ∈ n × n : [x′ ]α = [y ′]α .
ker(α) = (1, 4 | 2, 3 | 5, 6),
coker(α) = (1, 3, 6 | 2 | 4, 5),
using an obvious notation for equivalences.
It is immediate from the definitions that the following hold for all α, β ∈ Pn :
dom(αβ) ⊆ dom(α),
ker(αβ) ⊇ ker(α),
codom(αβ) ⊆ codom(β),
Also, rank(αβγ) ≤ rank(β) for all α, β, γ ∈ Pn .
2
coker(αβ) ⊇ coker(β).
If α ∈ Pn , we will write
α=
A1 · · · Ar C1 · · · Cp
B1 · · · Br D1 · · · Dq
!
to indicate that α has transversal blocks Ai ∪ Bi′ (for 1 ≤ i ≤ r), upper non-transversal blocks Cj
(for 1 ≤ j ≤ p), and lower non-transversal blocks Dk′ (for 1 ≤ k ≤ q). (For A ⊆ n, we
1 ··· Ar
.
write A′ = {a′ : a ∈ A}.) If α (as above) has no non-transversal blocks, we will write α = A
B1 ··· Br
Such a partition is also known as a block bijection, and the set Jn of all such block bijections is (isomorphic to) the dual symmetric inverse monoid of degree n; see [6, 13]. If each block of α (as
above)
n in at most one point and also intersects n′ in at most one point, we will write
a1 intersects
··· ar
α = b1 ··· br to indicate that α has transversal blocks {ai , b′i } (for 1 ≤ i ≤ r), all other blocks being
singletons. Such a partition is also known as a partial permutation, and the set In of all such partial
permutations is (isomorphic to) the symmetric inverse monoid ; see [7, 19]. As usual, with α ∈ In as
above, we will write ai α = bi for each i. The group of units of Pn is (isomorphic to)the symmetric
1 ··· n
1 ··· n
.
=
group Sn = Jn ∩ In . A permutation π of n is identified with the partition 1π
1π ··· nπ
··· nπ
The set Pn \ Sn = {α ∈ Pn : rank(α) < n} of non-invertible (i.e., singular ) partitions is a subsemigroup (indeed, an ideal) of Pn .
In order to state the above-mentioned presentations for Pn \ Sn and Pn from [6, 7], we first fix the
notation we will be using for presentations. Let X be an alphabet, and denote by X + (resp., X ∗ )
the free semigroup (resp., free monoid) on X. If R ⊆ X + × X + (resp., R ⊆ X ∗ × X ∗ ), we denote
by R♯ the congruence on X + (resp., X ∗ ) generated by R. We say a semigroup (resp., monoid) S has
semigroup (resp., monoid ) presentation hX : Ri if S ∼
= X + /R♯ (resp., S ∼
= X ∗ /R♯ ) or, equivalently,
if there is an epimorphism X + → S (resp., X ∗ → S) with kernel R♯ . If φ is such an epimorphism,
we say S has presentation hX : Ri via φ. A relation (w1 , w2 ) ∈ R will usually be displayed as an
equation: w1 = w2 . We will always be careful to specify whether a given presentation is a semigroup
or monoid presentation. We denote the empty word (over any alphabet) by 1, so X ∗ = X + ∪ {1}. If
A is a subset of a semigroup S, then hAi always denotes the subsemigroup generated by A.
For 1 ≤ r ≤ n and 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n, define partitions
r
1
er =
n
···
···
···
···
and
tij = tji =
n
j
i
1
···
···
···
···
···
···
.
Consider alphabets E = {er : 1 ≤ r ≤ n} and T = {tij : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n}, and define a (semigroup)
homomorphism
φ : (E ∪ T )+ → Pn \ Sn
by er φ = er and tij φ = tij for each 1 ≤ r ≤ n and 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n. We will use symmetric notation
when referring to the letters from T , so we write tij = tji for all 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n. Consider the relations
e2i = ei
ei ej = ej ei
t2ij = tij
tij tkl
tij tjk
tij ek
tij ek tij
ek tij ek
ek tki ei tij ej tjk ek
ek tki ei tij ej tjl el tlk ek
for all i
for distinct i, j
for all i, j
= tkl tij
= tjk tki
= ek tij
= tij
= ek
= ek tkj ej tji ei tik ek
= ek tkl el tli ei tij ej tjk ek
for all i, j, k, l
for distinct i, j, k
if k 6∈ {i, j}
if k ∈ {i, j}
if k ∈ {i, j}
for distinct i, j, k
for distinct i, j, k, l.
Here is the first of our main results; it originally appeared in [7, Theorem 46].
3
(R1)
(R2)
(R3)
(R4)
(R5)
(R6)
(R7)
(R8)
(R9)
(R10)
Theorem 2.1. The semigroup Pn \ Sn has semigroup presentation hE ∪ T : (R1–R10)i via φ.
In order to state the second main result, define partitions
n
1
e = e1 =
···
n
1
,
t = t1 =
···
···
,
si Φ =
···
n
i
1
···
···
···
···
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1.
Consider the alphabet S = {si : 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1}, and define a (monoid) homomorphism
Φ : (S ∪ {e, t})∗ → Pn
by eΦ = e, tΦ = t and si Φ = si for each i. Consider the relations
s2i = 1
for all i
si sj = sj si
if |i − j| > 1
si sj si = sj si sj
if |i − j| = 1
2
e = e = ete
2
t = t = tet = ts1 = s1 t
esi = si e
if i ≥ 2
tsi = si t
if i ≥ 3
s1 es1 e = es1 es1 = es1 e
ts2 ts2 = s2 ts2 t
t(s2 s3 s1 s2 )t(s2 s3 s1 s2 ) = (s2 s3 s1 s2 )t(s2 s3 s1 s2 )t
t(s2 s1 es1 s2 ) = (s2 s1 es1 s2 )t.
(R11)
(R12)
(R13)
(R14)
(R15)
(R16)
(R17)
(R18)
(R19)
(R20)
(R21)
Here is our second main result; this originally appeared in [6, Theorem 32].
Theorem 2.2. The monoid Pn has monoid presentation hS ∪ {e, t} : (R11–R21)i via Φ.
We conclude this section by stating the presentation for In \ Sn from [8]. (Recall that In was defined
above.) With this in mind, for i, j ∈ n with i 6= j, define f ij = ei tij ej (using symmetric notation for
tij = tji ). Note that f ij 6= f ji ; rather,
n
j
1
i
···
···
···
if i < j
···
···
···
f ij =
1··· j ··· i ··· n
if j < i.
···
···
···
Define an alphabet F = {fij : i, j ∈ n, i 6= j}, and consider the relations
fij fji fij = fij
fij3 = fij2 = fji2
fij fkl
fij fji
fij fik = fjk fij
fki fij fjk
fki fij fjk fkl
= fkl fij
= fik fki
= fik fjk
= fkj fji fik
= fkl fli fij fjl
for distinct i, j
for distinct i, j
(F1)
(F2)
for
for
for
for
for
(F3)
(F4)
(F5)
(F6)
(F7)
distinct
distinct
distinct
distinct
distinct
i, j, k, l
i, j, k
i, j, k
i, j, k
i, j, k, l.
The next result is [8, Theorem 2.1].
Theorem 2.3. The semigroup In \ Sn has semigroup presentation hF : (F1–F7)i via fij 7→ f ij .
4
✷
3
Presentation for Pn \ Sn
There are two components to the proof of Theorem 2.1: that the map φ : (E ∪ T )+ → Pn \ Sn is an
epimorphism; and that ker φ is generated by relations (R1–R10). Proposition 3.1 accomplishes the
first task, and the remainder of the section is devoted to the second.
We write Eqn for the set of all equivalence relations on n, which we regard as a semilattice (monoid
of commuting idempotents) under ∨; the join, ε ∨ η, of two equivalences ε, η ∈ Eqn is defined to be
the smallest equivalence containing ε ∪ η (see [11, 13]).
i1 ··· ik
. Note that tA = 1 if |A| ≤ 1.
For a subset A ⊆ n with n \ A = {i1 , . . . , ik }, we write tA = A
A i1 ··· ik
Note that if i, j ∈ n with i 6= j, then t{i,j} = tij in the notation of the previous section. Note that
if A = {a1 , a2 , . . . , ar } with r = |A| ≥ 2, then tA = ta1 a2 ta2 a3 · · · tar−1 ar = ta1 a2 ta1 a3 · · · ta1 ar . For an
1 ··· Ak
= tA1 · · · tAk . In
equivalence ε ∈ Eqn with equivalence classes A1 , . . . , Ak , we write tε = A
A1 ··· Ak
fact, the set {tε : ε ∈ Eqn } is equal to E(Jn ), the semilattice of idempotents of (the isomorphic copy
of) the dual symmetric inverse monoid Jn ⊆ Pn ; see [13]. In particular, E(Jn ) is isomorphic to the
semilattice (Eqn , ∨); so tε tη = tε∨η for all ε, η ∈ Eqn . By the discussion above, we see that E(Jn )
is generated (as a monoid) by the set {tij : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n}. Theorem 2 of [11] says that E(Jn ) has
(monoid) presentation hT : (R3–R5)i via the map tij 7→ tij .
Proposition 3.1. The semigroup Pn \Sn is generated by the set {er : 1 ≤ r ≤ n}∪{tij : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n}.
In particular, the map φ : (E ∪ T )+ → Pn \ Sn is surjective.
Proof. Let α ∈ Pn \ Sn , and write
α=
A1 · · · Ar C1 · · · Cp
B1 · · · Br D1 · · · Dq
!
,
noting that r = rank(α) ≤ n − 1. For each
r, choose
Ai and bi ∈ Bi . Then clearly
some ai ∈
1 ≤ i≤
B1 ··· Br D1 ··· Dq
a1 ··· ar
A1 ··· Ar C1 ··· Cp
α = βγδ, where β = A1 ··· Ar C1 ··· Cp , γ = b1 ··· br and δ = B1 ··· Br D1 ··· Dq . Note that
β = tker(α) and δ = tcoker(α) , so that β, δ ∈ htij : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ ni ∪ {1}, by the discussion before the
statement of the proposition. By Theorem 2.3, γ ∈ In \ Sn is a (non-empty) product of terms of the
form f ij = ei tij ej .
✷
Remark 3.2. Proposition 3.1 was also proven in [9, Theorem 9], using a classical result of Howie on
transformation semigroups [15]. Since {er : 1 ≤ r ≤ n} ⊆ E(In ) and {tij : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n} ⊆ E(Jn ),
it follows that hE(Pn )i = hE(In ) ∪ E(Jn )i = {1} ∪ (Pn \ Sn ).
Now that we know φ is surjective, it remains to show that ker φ = ∼, where ∼ is the congruence on
(E ∪ T )+ generated by the relations (R1–R10). For w ∈ (E ∪ T )+ , we write w = wφ. Even though
the empty word 1 does not belong to (E ∪ T )+ , we will also write 1 = 1 and 1 ∼ 1.
Lemma 3.3. We have ∼ ⊆ ker φ.
Proof. This follows by a simple diagrammatic check that φ preserves the relations (R1–R10). We
do this for (R7) in Figure 1, and leave the rest for the reader.
✷
For i, j ∈ n with i 6= j, define the word zij = ei tij ej ∈ (E ∪ T )+ , and write Z = {zij : i, j ∈ n, i 6= j}
for the set of all such words. Note that z ij = zij φ = f ij ∈ In . The words zij will play a crucial role
in what follows. We first prove a number of basic relations satisfied among them.
5
n
j
i
1
n
j
i
1
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
···
=
n
j
i
1
···
···
···
···
···
···
=
Figure 1: Diagrammatic proof of relation (R7): tij ei tij = tij ej tij = tij .
Lemma 3.4. Let i, j, k ∈ n be distinct. Then
(i) ei zij ∼ zij ∼ zij ej ;
2
(ii) ej zij ∼ zij ei ∼ ei ej ∼ zij2 ∼ zji
;
(iii) zij zji ∼ ei ;
(iv) ek zij ∼ zij ek .
Proof. Part (i) follows immediately from (R1). For (ii), note that ej zij = ej ei tij ej ∼ ei ej tij ej ∼ ei ej ,
by (R2) and (R8). A similar calculation gives zij ei ∼ ei ej . Together with (R8), it also follows that
2
zij2 = zij ei tij ej ∼ ei ej tij ej ∼ ei ej ; similarly, zji
∼ ei ej , completing the proof of (ii). For (iii), we
have zij zji = ei tij ej ej tij ei ∼ ei tij ej tij ei ∼ ei tij ei ∼ ei , by (R1), (R7) and (R8). Finally, (iv) follows
immediately from (R2) and (R6).
✷
Recall that for α ∈ In and x ∈ dom(α), we write xα for the (unique) element of codom(α) such that
{x, (xα)′ } is a block of α. Recall also that we are using symmetric notation for the tij = tji .
Lemma 3.5. Let i, j, k, l ∈ n with i 6= j, k 6= l and k 6∈ {i, j}.
zkl tij if l
tij zkl ∼ zkl tiz kl ,jzkl = zkl tkj if l
zkl tik if l
Then
6∈ {i, j}
=i
= j.
Proof. The case in which l 6∈ {i, j} follows immediately from (R4) and (R6). If l = i, then
tij zkl = tlj ek tkl el ∼ ek tlj tkl el = ek tjl tlk el ∼ ek tlk tkj el ∼ ek tkl el tkj = zkl tkj ,
by (R5) and (R6). The l = j case is similar.
✷
Recall that hZi denotes the subsemigroup of (E ∪ T )+ generated by Z.
Corollary 3.6. If w ∈ hZi and i, j ∈ dom(w) with i 6= j, then tij w ∼ wtiw,jw .
Proof. This follows immediately from Lemma 3.5, after writing w = zk1 l1 · · · zks ls .
✷
The next result shows that (modulo the relations (R1–R10)) the words zij satisfy the defining relations
for In \ Sn from Theorem 2.3.
Lemma 3.7. For distinct i, j, k, l ∈ n, we have
zij zji zij ∼ zij
2
zij3 ∼ zij2 ∼ zji
zij zkl
zij zji
zij zik ∼ zjk zij
zki zij zjk
zki zij zjk zkl
6
∼ zkl zij
∼ zik zki
∼ zik zjk
∼ zkj zji zik
∼ zkl zli zij zjl .
(Z1)
(Z2)
(Z3)
(Z4)
(Z5)
(Z6)
(Z7)
Proof. For (Z1), we have zij zji zij ∼ ei zij ∼ zij , by Lemma 3.4(iii) and (i). For (Z2), note that
2
zij2 ∼ zji
∼ ei ej by Lemma 3.4(ii); it also follows that zij3 ∼ ei ej zij ∼ ei ei ej ∼ ei ej by Lemma 3.4(ii)
and (R1), completing the proof of (Z2). Relation (Z3) follows immediately from (R2), (R4) and (R6).
Relation (Z4) follows immediately from Lemma 3.4(iii). For (Z5), first note that zij zik ∼ zij ei zik ∼
ei ej zik ∼ ej ei zik ∼ ej zik , by Lemma 3.4(i) and (ii), and (R2). We also have
zjk zij = ej tjk ek ei tij ej ∼ ei ej tjk tij ej ek
= ei ej tkj tji ej ek
∼ ei ej tji tik ej ek
∼ ei ej tji ej tik ek
∼ ei ej tik ek
∼ ej ei tik ek = ej zik
by (R2) and (R6)
by
by
by
by
(R5)
(R6)
(R8)
(R2).
By Lemma 3.4(i), (ii) and (iv), zik zjk ∼ zik ek zjk ∼ zik ej ek ∼ ej zik ek ∼∼ ej zik , completing the proof
of (Z5). For (Z6), we have
zki zij zjk = ek tki ei ei tij ej ej tjk ek ∼ ek tki ei tij ej tjk ek ∼ ek tkj ej tji ei tik ek ∼ ek tkj ej ej tji ei ei tik ek = zkj zji zik ,
by (R1) and (R9). Finally, for (Z7), first observe that by a similar calculation to that just carried
out, (R10) gives zki zij zjl zlk ∼ zkl zli zij zjk . We then have
zki zij zjk zkl ∼ zki zij zji zij zjk zkl
∼ zki zij zjl zlj zjk zkl
∼ zki zij zjl zlk zkj zjl
∼ zkl zli zij zjk zkj zjl
∼ zkl zli zij zjl zlj zjl
∼ zkl zli zij zjl
by
by
by
by
by
by
(Z1)
(Z4)
(Z6)
the observation
(Z4)
(Z1).
This completes the proof.
✷
Corollary 3.8. If u, v ∈ hZi, then u = v ⇒ u ∼ v.
Proof. Write u = zi1 j1 · · · zis js and v = zk1 l1 · · · zkt lt , and suppose u = v. Then
f i1 j1 · · · f is js = z i1 j1 · · · z is js = u = v = z k1 l1 · · · z kt lt = f k1 l1 · · · f kt lt .
By Theorem 2.3, the word fi1 j1 · · · fis js may be transformed into fk1 l1 · · · fkt lt using relations (F1–F7).
By Lemma 3.7, this transformation leads to a transformation of u into v using (Z1–Z7).
✷
The next result follows from [11, Theorem 2], which (as noted above) states that E(Jn ) ∼
= (Eqn , ∨)
has monoid presentation hT : (R3–R5)i via tij 7→ tij .
Lemma 3.9. If u, v ∈ T ∗ , then u = v ⇒ u ∼ v.
✷
In order to complete the proof of Theorem 2.1, we aim to show that any word over E ∪ T may be
rewritten (using the relations) to take on a very specific form; see Proposition 3.14, the proof of
which requires the next three intermediate lemmas.
Lemma 3.10. If w ∈ (E ∪ T )+ , then w ∼ w1 w2 w3 for some w1 , w3 ∈ T ∗ and w2 ∈ hZi.
7
Proof. We prove this by induction on ℓ(w), the length of the word w. Suppose first that ℓ(w) = 1.
If w = ei for some i, then w ∼ zij zji for any j ∈ n \ {i}, by Lemma 3.4(iii), and we are done (with
w1 = w3 = 1 and w2 = zij zji ). If w = tij for some 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n, then w = tij ∼ tij ei tij ∼ tij zij zji tij ,
by (R7) and Lemma 3.4(iii), and we are done (with w1 = w3 = tij and w2 = zij zji ).
Now suppose ℓ(w) ≥ 2, and write w = ux, where u ∈ (E ∪ T )+ and x ∈ E ∪ T . By an inductive
hypothesis, u ∼ u1 u2 u3 for some u1 , u3 ∈ T ∗ and u2 ∈ hZi. If x ∈ T , then w ∼ u1 u2 u3 x, and we are
done (with w1 = u1 , w2 = u2 and w3 = u3 x). So suppose x = ei ∈ E, and write u3 = tk1 l1 · · · tks ls .
Case 1. If i 6∈ {k1 , . . . , ks , l1 , . . . , ls }, then u3 ei ∼ ei u3 ∼ zij zji u3 for any j ∈ n \ {i}, by (R6) and
Lemma 3.4(iii), so w ∼ u1 u2 zij zji u3 , and we are done (with w1 = u1 , w2 = u2 zij zji and w3 = u3 ).
Case 2. Now suppose i ∈ {k1 , . . . , ks , l1 , . . . , ls }. By (R3), (R4), and the symmetrical notation for
the tkl = tlk , we may assume that in fact u3 = til1 · · · tilr · tkr+1lr+1 · · · tks ls with r ≥ 1 and l1 < · · · < lr .
Now til1 · · · tilr ∼ til1 tl1 l2 · · · tlr−1 lr , by Lemma 3.9. It follows that
w ∼ u1 u2 til1 tl1 l2 · · · tlr−1 lr tkr+1 lr+1 · · · tks ls ei ∼ u1 · u2 til1 ei · u4 ,
where u4 = tl1 l2 · · · tlr−1 lr tkr+1 lr+1 · · · tks ls . For simplicity, we will write j = l1 . Since u1 , u4 ∈ T ∗ , the
proof will be complete if we can show that u2 tij ei ∼ v1 v2 v3 for some v1 , v3 ∈ T ∗ and v2 ∈ hZi.
Subcase 2.1. Suppose first that i, j ∈ codom(u2 ), and let k, l ∈ dom(u2 ) be such that ku2 = i and
lu2 = j. Then tkl u2 ∼ u2 tij , by Corollary 3.6, whence u2 tij ei ∼ tkl u2 ei ∼ tkl u2 zij zji , and we are done
(with v1 = tkl , v2 = u2 zij zji and v3 = 1).
Subcase 2.2. Next suppose i 6∈ codom(u2 ). Then u2 ∼ u2 zij zji ∼ u2 ei , by Corollary 3.8 and
Lemma 3.4(iii). But then, together with (R8), it follows that u2 tij ei ∼ u2 ei tij ei ∼ u2 ei ∼ u2 , and we
are done (with v1 = v3 = 1 and v2 = u2).
Subcase 2.3. Finally, suppose j 6∈ codom(u2 ). Then u2 ∼ u2 ej , as in the previous case, giving
u2 tij ei ∼ u2 ej tij ei = u2 zji , and we are done (with v1 = v3 = 1 and v2 = u2 zij ).
✷
To improve Lemma 3.10, we first define some words over T . Consider a subset A ⊆ n. If |A| ≤ 1, then
put tA = 1. Otherwise, write A = {i1 , . . . , ik } with i1 < · · · < ik , and define tA = ti1 i2 ti2 i3 · · · tik−1 ik .
For an equivalence ε ∈ Eqn with equivalence classes A1 , . . . , Ar with min(A
1 ) < · · · < min(Ar ), define
A1 ··· Ar
∗
tε = tA1 · · · tAr . Note that if w ∈ T is such that w = tε = A1 ··· Ar , then w ∼ tε , by Lemma 3.9.
For the proof of the next result, if ε ∈ Eqn , we write n/ε for the set of all ε-classes.
Lemma 3.11. Let w ∈ (E ∪ T )+ , and put ε = ker(w) and η = coker(w). Then w ∼ tε utη for some
u ∈ hZi.
Proof. By Lemmas 3.9 and 3.10, the set (λ, u, ρ) ∈ Eqn × hZi × Eqn : w ∼ tλ utρ is non-empty.
Choose an element (λ, u, ρ) from this set such that k = |n/λ| + |n/ρ| is minimal. Suppose the λclasses and ρ-classes are A1 , . . . , Ap and B1 , . . . , Bq , respectively (so p = |n/λ| and q = |n/ρ|). Note
that λ = ker(tλ ) ⊆ ker(tλ utρ ) = ker(w) = ε and, similarly, ρ ⊆ η. In particular, each ε-class is a
union of (one or more) λ-classes, with a similar statement holding for η-classes and ρ-classes. Let
the ε-classes and η-classes be C1 , . . . , Cs and D1 , . . . , Dt , respectively (so s = |n/ε| and t = |n/η|),
noting that s ≤ p and t ≤ q. In particular, k = p + q ≥ s + t. If k = s + t, then p = s and q = t, so
that λ = ε and ρ = η, and the proof would be complete. So suppose instead that k > s + t. Note
that one of the following statements must be true:
(i) there exist a, b ∈ dom(u) such that (a, b) ∈ λ and (au, bu) 6∈ ρ; or
(ii) there exist a, b ∈ dom(u) such that (a, b) 6∈ λ and (au, bu) ∈ ρ.
8
Indeed, if (i) and (ii) were both false, then we would have λ = ker(tλ utρ ) = ker(w) = ε and, similarly,
ρ = η, contradicting the assumption that k > s + t. Suppose (i) is true (the other case being similar),
and write c = au and d = bu. Relabelling if necessary, we may assume that a, b ∈ A1 , c ∈ B1
and d ∈ B2 . Since (a, b) ∈ λ, Lemma 3.9 gives tλ ∼ tλ tab . Let εcd ∈ Eqn be the equivalence
whose only non-singleton equivalence class is {c, d}, and let κ = εcd ∨ ρ. Then Lemma 3.9 also gives
tcd tρ = tεcd tρ ∼ tκ . Together with Corollary 3.6, it then follows that w ∼ tλ tab utρ ∼ tλ utcd tρ ∼ tλ utκ .
But κ has q − 1 equivalence classes (i.e., B1 ∪ B2 , B3 , . . . , Bq ), so |n/λ| + |n/κ| = k − 1, contradicting
the minimality of k.
✷
Remark 3.12. The proof of Lemma 3.11 is set out as a reductio merely for convenience. It is easily
adapted to become constructive. (The same is true of Lemma 3.13 and Proposition 3.14).
Lemma 3.13. Let w ∈ (E ∪ T )+ , and put ε = ker(w) and η = coker(w). Then w ∼ tε utη for some
u ∈ hZi with rank(u) = rank(w).
Proof. Put r = rank(w). By Lemma 3.11, the set {u ∈ hZi : w ∼ tε utη } is non-empty. Choose
an element u from this set with rank(u) minimal. If rank(u) = r, then we are done, so suppose
otherwise. Since r = rank(w) = rank(tε utη ) ≤ rank(u), it follows that rank(u) > r. Suppose the
ε-classes and η-classes are A1 , . . . , Ap and B1 , . . . , Bq , respectively, and that the transversal blocks
of w are A1 ∪ B1′ , . . . , Ar ∪ Br′ . Note that dom(u) ⊆ A1 ∪ · · · ∪ Ar and codom(u) ⊆ B1 ∪ · · · ∪ Br . Since
rank(u) > r, we may assume (relabelling if necessary) that |A1 ∩ dom(u)| ≥ 2. Let i, j ∈ A1 ∩ dom(u)
with i 6= j, and put k = iu and l = ju, noting that k, l ∈ B1 . It follows from Lemma 3.9 and
Corollary 3.6 that tε ∼ tε tij , tη ∼ tkl tη , and tij u ∼ utkl . Together with (R7) and Lemma 3.4(iii), we
then obtain w ∼ tε utη ∼ tε tij utη ∼ tε tij ei tij utη ∼ tε tij ei utkl tη ∼ tε (zij zji u)tη . But dom(z ij z ji u) =
dom(u) \ {i}, so that rank(z ij z ji u) = rank(u) − 1, contradicting the minimality of rank(u).
✷
The next result gives a set of normal forms for words over E ∪ T , and is the final ingredient in the
proof of Theorem 2.1. For each α ∈ In \ Sn , fix some zα ∈ hZi such that z α = zα φ = α.
Proposition 3.14. Let w ∈ (E ∪ T )+ , and write
!
A1 · · · Ar C1 · · · Cp
w=
, ε = ker(w),
B1 · · · Br D1 · · · Dq
η = coker(w),
α=
"
#
a1 · · · ar
,
b1 · · · br
where ai = min(Ai ) and bi = min(Bi ) for each i. Then w ∼ tε zα tη .
Proof. By Lemma 3.13, the set {u ∈ hZi : rank(u) = r, w ∼ tε utη } is non-empty. Choose some u
We claim that k = 2r.
from this set with k = |dom(u) ∩ dom(α)| + |codom(u) ∩ codom(α)|
c1 ··· crmaximal.
Indeed, suppose to the contrary that k < 2r, and write u = d1 ··· dr , where ci ∈ Ai and di ∈ Bi for
each i. Since k < 2r, it follows that ci 6= ai or di 6= bi for some i. We assume the former is the case (the
latter is treated in similar fashion). Relabelling if necessary, we may assume that i = 1; for simplicity,
we will write a = a1 and c = c1 . Since a 6∈ dom(u), we have u ∼ zac zca u = ea tac ec zca u ∼ ea tac zca u, by
Corollary 3.8 and Lemma 3.4(i). Since a, c ∈ A1 , Lemma 3.9 gives tε ∼ tε tac . Together with (R7), it
cr
.
follows that w ∼ tε utη ∼ tε tac (ea tac zca u)tη ∼ tε tac zca utη ∼ tε (zca u)tη . Note that z ca u = ad11 dc22 ···
··· dr
But |dom(z ca u) ∩ dom(α)| + |codom(z ca u) ∩ codom(α)| = k + 1, contradicting the maximality of k.
This completes the proof of the claim. It follows that u = α, so Corollary 3.8 gives u ∼ zα .
✷
We now have all we need to complete the proof of the first main result.
Proof of Theorem 2.1. It remains to check that ker φ ⊆ ∼, so suppose w, v ∈ (E ∪ T )+ are
such that w = v. Then w ∼ tε zα tη , in the notation of Proposition 3.14. Since v = w, we also have
v ∼ tε zα tη , so that w ∼ v.
✷
9
4
Presentation for Pn
Again, the proof of Theorem 2.2 involves two steps: showing that the map Φ : (S ∪ {e, t})∗ → Pn is
an epimorphism; and showing that ker Φ is generated by relations (R11–R21).
Write ≈ for the congruence on (S ∪ {e, t})∗ generated by (R11–R21). Without causing confusion, we
will write w = wΦ for any w ∈ (S ∪ {e, t})∗ . For w = si1 · · · sik ∈ S ∗ , we will write w −1 = sik · · · si1 ,
noting that ww −1 ≈ w −1 w ≈ 1, by (R11). Note also that the symmetric group Sn ⊆ Pn has monoid
presentation hS : (R11–R13)i via si 7→ si ; see [23].
For 1 ≤ r ≤ n and 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n, define the words
cr = s1 · · · sr−1 ,
ǫr = c−1
i eci ,
−1
τij = τji = c−1
i cj tcj ci .
One may easily check diagrammatically that ǫr = ǫr Φ = er and τ ij = τij Φ = tij . In particular, im Φ
contains Pn \ Sn , by Proposition 3.1. Since also SΦ = {sr : 1 ≤ r ≤ n − 1} generates Sn , it follows
that Φ is surjective. It is easy to check that each of relations (R11–R21) are preserved by Φ. So,
to prove Theorem 2.2, it remains to check that ker Φ ⊆ ≈, and the rest of this section is devoted to
that task. We begin with some simple properties of the words ǫr and τij .
Lemma 4.1. If 1 ≤ r ≤ n and 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1, then sk ǫr sk ≈ ǫrsk .
Proof. We must show that
ǫr−1
sk ǫr sk ≈ ǫr+1
ǫr
if k = r − 1
if k = r
otherwise.
These follows quickly from (R11), (R16), and the easily checked facts that
−1
s
c
if
k
≤
r
−
2
cr sk+1 if
k+1
r
c
if k = r − 1
c−1
if
r−1
r−1
cr sk ≈
and
sk c−1
≈
r
−1
cr+1
if k = r
cr+1
if
−1
sk cr
if k ≥ r + 1
cr sk
if
k
k
k
k
≤r−2
= r−1
=r
≥ r + 1.
−1
For example, if k = r − 1, then sk ǫr sk = sr−1 c−1
r ecr sr−1 ≈ cr−1 ecr−1 = ǫr−1 , while if k ≤ r − 2, then
−1
−1
−1
sk ǫr sk = sk c−1
✷
r ecr sk ≈ cr sk+1 esk+1 cr ≈ cr sk+1 sk+1 ecr ≈ cr ecr = ǫr .
Lemma 4.2 (cf. [11, p322]). If 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n and 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1, then sk τij sk ≈ τisk ,jsk .
Proof. This follows by a similar proof to that of Lemma 4.1, using the same relations satisfied by
the cr , sk . For example, if k = j, then
−1
−1
−1
−1 −1
sk τij sk = sj c−1
i cj tcj ci sj ≈ ci sj cj tcj sj ci ≈ ci cj+1 tcj+1 ci = τi,j+1 .
✷
Corollary 4.3. If 1 ≤ r ≤ n, 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n, and w ∈ S ∗ , then w −1ǫr w ≈ ǫrw and w −1 τij w ≈ τiw,jw .
Proof. This follows from Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2 and a simple induction on the length of w.
✷
We now aim to link the presentations hE ∪ T : (R1–R10)i and hS ∪ {e, t} : (R11–R21)i in a certain
sense. With this in mind, we define a map ψ : (E ∪ T )+ → (S ∪ {e, t})∗ by er ψ = ǫr and tij ψ = τij .
Note that u = uψ (i.e., uφ = uψΦ) for all u ∈ (E ∪ T )+ . Recall that ∼ is the congruence on (E ∪ T )+
generated by relations (R1–R10).
10
Lemma 4.4. If u, v ∈ (E ∪ T )+ , then u ∼ v ⇒ uψ ≈ vψ.
Proof. We just need to check this for each relation u = v from (R1–R10). Relations (R1) and (R3)
follow immediately from (R11), (R14), (R15). For (R2), first note that ǫ1 ǫ2 = es1 es1 ≈ s1 es1 e = ǫ2 ǫ1 ,
by (R18). Together with Corollary 4.3, it follows that for any w ∈ S ∗ with 1w = i and 2w = j,
ǫi ǫj ≈ w −1 ǫ1 ww −1ǫ2 w ≈ w −1 ǫ1 ǫ2 w ≈ w −1 ǫ2 ǫ1 w ≈ w −1 ǫ2 ww −1 ǫ1 w ≈ ǫj ǫi . The other relations are all
treated in similar fashion; in each case, we use Corollary 4.3 to reduce the calculation to a fixed set
of values of the subscripts. For example, for (R9), taking (i, j, k) = (1, 2, 3),
ǫ3 τ31 ǫ1 τ12 ǫ2 τ23 ǫ3 = (s2 s1 es1 s2 )(s2 s1 ts1 s2 )et(s1 es1 )(s1 s2 s1 ts1 s2 s1 )(s2 s1 es1 s2 )
≈ s2 s1 ets2 etes2 ts2 s1 s2 s1 es1 s2
by (R11) and (R15)
≈ s2 s1 ets2 es2 ts2 s2 s1 s2 es1 s2
by (R13) and (R14)
≈ s2 s1 etes2 s2 ts1 s2 es1 s2
by (R11) and (R16)
≈ s2 s1 etes2 s1 s2
by (R11), (R14), (R15) and (R16)
≈ s2 s1 es2 s1 s2
by (R14),
with a similar calculation giving ǫ3 τ32 ǫ2 τ21 ǫ1 τ13 ǫ3 ≈ s2 s1 es2 s1 s2 .
✷
Lemma 4.5. If 1 ≤ r ≤ n and 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1, then ǫr sk and sk ǫr are both ≈-equivalent to elements
of im ψ.
Proof. Since sk ǫr ≈ sk ǫr sk sk ≈ ǫrsk sk , by (R11) and Lemma 4.1, it suffices to show that
if k = r − 1
ǫr τr,r−1 ǫr−1
ǫr sk ≈ ǫr τr,r+1 ǫr+1
if k = r
ǫr τrk ǫk τk,k+1ǫk+1 τk+1,r ǫr otherwise.
We just treat the case in which k 6∈ {r − 1, r}, the others being easier. As above, we may assume
that k = 1 and r = 3. Here we have ǫ3 τ31 ǫ1 τ12 ǫ2 τ23 ǫ3 ≈ s2 s1 es2 s1 s2 ≈ s2 s1 es1 s2 s1 = ǫ3 s1 , by (R13)
and the calculation from the proof of Lemma 4.4.
✷
Lemma 4.6. If 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n and 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1, then τij sk and sk τij are both ≈-equivalent to
elements of im ψ.
Proof. Again, it suffices to do this for just τij sk . By (R11) and Lemmas 4.2 and 4.4, we have
τij sk ≈ τij ǫi τij sk ≈ τij ǫi sk sk τij sk ≈ τij (ǫi sk )τisk ,jsk , and the result now follows from Lemma 4.5. ✷
Lemma 4.7. If w ∈ (S ∪ {e, t})∗ \ S ∗ , then w is ≈-equivalent to an element of im ψ.
Proof. Put Σ = (E ∪ T )ψ = {ǫr : 1 ≤ r ≤ n} ∪ {τij : 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n}, noting that im ψ = hΣi.
Since e = ǫ1 ∈ Σ and t ≈ s1 ts1 = τ12 ∈ Σ, it suffices to show that every element of hΣ ∪ Si \ S ∗ is
≈-equivalent to an element of hΣi. With this in mind, let w ∈ hΣ ∪ Si \ S ∗ , and write w = x1 · · · xk ,
where x1 , . . . , xk ∈ Σ ∪ S. Denote by l the number of factors xi that belong to S. We proceed
by induction on l. If l = 0, then we already have w ∈ hΣi, so suppose l ≥ 1. Since w 6∈ S ∗ ,
there exists 1 ≤ i ≤ k − 1 such that either (i) xi ∈ S and xi+1 ∈ Σ, or (ii) xi ∈ Σ and xi+1 ∈ S.
In either case, Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6 tell us that xi xi+1 ≈ u for some u ∈ im ψ = hΣi. But then
w ≈ (x1 · · · xi−1 )u(xi+2 · · · xk ), and we are done, after applying an induction hypothesis (noting that
(x1 · · · xi−1 )u(xi+2 · · · xk ) has l − 1 factors from S).
✷
11
We may now prove the second main result.
Proof of Theorem 2.2. It remains to show that ker Φ ⊆ ≈, so suppose w1 , w2 ∈ (S ∪ {e, t})∗
are such that w 1 = w 2 . If w1 ∈ Sn , then w1 , w2 ∈ S ∗ , so w1 ≈ w2 , using only relations (R11–R13).
So suppose w1 6∈ Sn . It follows that w1 , w2 ∈ (S ∪ {e, t})∗ \ S ∗ . So, by Lemma 4.7, w1 ≈ u1 ψ and
w2 ≈ u2 ψ for some u1, u2 ∈ (E ∪ T )+ . We then have u1 = u1 ψ = w 1 = w 2 = u2 ψ = u2 , so that
u1 ∼ u2 , by Theorem 2.1. Lemma 4.4 then gives u1 ψ ≈ u2 ψ, so that w1 ≈ w2 .
✷
References
[1] K. Auinger, Yuzhu Chen, Xun Hu, Yanfeng Luo, and M. V. Volkov. The finite basis problem for Kauffman
monoids. Algebra Universalis, 74(3-4):333–350, 2015.
[2] Karl Auinger. Pseudovarieties generated by Brauer type monoids. Forum Math., 26(1):1–24, 2014.
[3] Karl Auinger, Igor Dolinka, and Mikhail V. Volkov. Equational theories of semigroups with involution. J. Algebra,
369:203–225, 2012.
[4] James East. A presentation of the singular part of the symmetric inverse monoid. Comm. Algebra, 34(5):1671–
1689, 2006.
[5] James East. A presentation for the singular part of the full transformation semigroup. Semigroup Forum,
81(2):357–379, 2010.
[6] James East. Generators and relations for partition monoids and algebras. J. Algebra, 339:1–26, 2011.
[7] James East. On the singular part of the partition monoid. Internat. J. Algebra Comput., 21(1-2):147–178, 2011.
[8] James East. A symmetrical presentation for the singular part of the symmetric inverse monoid. Algebra Universalis, 74(3-4):207–228, 2015.
[9] James East and D. G. FitzGerald. The semigroup generated by the idempotents of a partition monoid. J. Algebra,
372:108–133, 2012.
[10] James East and R. D. Gray. Diagram monoids and Graham–Houghton graphs: idempotents and generating sets
of ideals. Preprint, 2014, arXiv:1404.2359.
[11] D. G. FitzGerald. A presentation for the monoid of uniform block permutations. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.,
68(2):317–324, 2003.
[12] D. G. FitzGerald and Kwok Wai Lau. On the partition monoid and some related semigroups. Bull. Aust. Math.
Soc., 83(2):273–288, 2011.
[13] D. G. FitzGerald and Jonathan Leech. Dual symmetric inverse monoids and representation theory. J. Austral.
Math. Soc. Ser. A, 64(3):345–367, 1998.
[14] Tom Halverson and Arun Ram. Partition algebras. European J. Combin., 26(6):869–921, 2005.
[15] J. M. Howie. The subsemigroup generated by the idempotents of a full transformation semigroup. J. London
Math. Soc., 41:707–716, 1966.
[16] V. F. R. Jones. The Potts model and the symmetric group. In Subfactors (Kyuzeso, 1993), pages 259–267. World
Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1994.
[17] Steffen Koenig. A panorama of diagram algebras. In Trends in representation theory of algebras and related
topics, EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., pages 491–540. Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2008.
[18] Kwok Wai Lau and D. G. FitzGerald. Ideal structure of the Kauffman and related monoids. Comm. Algebra,
34(7):2617–2629, 2006.
[19] Stephen Lipscomb. Symmetric inverse semigroups, volume 46 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American
Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996.
[20] Victor Maltcev and Volodymyr Mazorchuk. Presentation of the singular part of the Brauer monoid. Math.
Bohem., 132(3):297–323, 2007.
[21] Paul Martin. Temperley-Lieb algebras for nonplanar statistical mechanics—the partition algebra construction.
J. Knot Theory Ramifications, 3(1):51–82, 1994.
[22] Paul Martin. On diagram categories, representation theory and statistical mechanics. In Noncommutative rings,
group rings, diagram algebras and their applications, volume 456 of Contemp. Math., pages 99–136. Amer. Math.
Soc., Providence, RI, 2008.
[23] Eliakim Hastings Moore. Concerning the abstract groups of order k! and 12 k! holohedrically isomorphic with the
symmetric and the alternating substitution-groups on k letters. Proc. London Math. Soc., 28(1):357–366, 1897.
[24] L. M. Popova. Defining relations in some semigroups of partial transformations of a finite set (in Russian).
Uchenye Zap. Leningrad Gos. Ped. Inst., 218:191–212, 1961.
[25] Stewart Wilcox. Cellularity of diagram algebras as twisted semigroup algebras. J. Algebra, 309(1):10–31, 2007.
12
| 4math.GR
|
arXiv:1205.3416v2 [math.RT] 29 Dec 2013
On the generalized Davenport constant and the
Noether number
Kálmán Cziszter
a
a ∗
and
Mátyás Domokos
b †
Central European University, Department of Mathematics and its Applications,
Nádor u. 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary
Email: cziszter [email protected]
b
Rényi Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
Reáltanoda u. 13-15, 1053 Budapest, Hungary
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
Known results on the generalized Davenport constant relating zerosum sequences over a finite abelian group are extended for the generalized
Noether number relating rings of polynomial invariants of an arbitrary
finite group. An improved general upper degree bound for polynomial
invariants of a non-cyclic finite group that cut out the zero vector is given.
2010 MSC: 13A50 (Primary) 11B75, 13A02 (Secondary)
Keywords: Noether number, Davenport constant, polynomial invariants
1
Introduction
The Davenport constant D(A) of a finite abelian group A is defined as the smallest positive integer n such that every sequence over A of length at least n has a
non-empty zero-sum subsequence. The Davenport constant naturally appears
in the theory of polynomial invariants of finite groups. The Noether number
β(G) of a finite group G is the maximal possible degree of an indecomposable
polynomial invariant of G (the definition involves a fixed base field F which we
always assume to have characteristic not dividing the order of G). It was shown
by B. Schmid [20] that when G = A is abelian, then β(G) = D(A).
Halter-Koch [14] introduced for any positive integer k the generalized Davenport constant Dk (A) as the smallest positive integer n such that every sequence
over A of length at least n is divisible by the product of k non-empty zero-sum
subsequences (cf. Chapter 6.1 in [13]; by the product of sequences over A we
mean their concatenation, and divisibility of sequences is defined accordingly).
∗ The
paper is based on results from the PhD thesis of the first author written at the Central
European University.
† The second author is partially supported by OTKA NK81203 and K101515.
1
This notion also can be seen as the abelian special case of a concept of invariant
theory. In [2] the authors introduced the generalized Noether number βk (G) for
an arbitrary finite group G and positive integer k (the definition again involves
a fixed base field F of characteristic not dividing |G|, suppressed from the notation). When G = A is abelian, then βk (A) = Dk (A). As it is demonstrated in
[2], the main use of the generalized Noether number is that it can be efficiently
used to derive upper bounds for the ordinary Noether number of a group in
terms of the generalized Noether numbers of its subquotients (see the beginning
of Section 4 for some details).
In the first part of the present note we develop further the analogy between
the generalized Davenport constant and the generalized Noether number. Theorem 3.4 gives a lower bound for the generalized Noether number of a direct
product of groups in terms of the generalized Noether numbers of the factors,
generalizing thereby Lemma 6.1.4 from [13] for non-abelian groups. Next we
investigate the behaviour of βk (G) as a function of k. The fact that Dk (A) is
an almost linear function of k was shown by M. Freeze and W. A. Schmid [11],
building on a result of Delorme, Ordaz and Quiroz [4]; see also Theorem 6.1.5 in
[13]. This is generalized in Corollary 4.7, which we derive from basic generalities
on graded rings and the method of polarization in invariant theory. It states
that for a fixed finite group G and a base field F of characteristic zero there
exists a positive integer k0 and a non-negative integer β0 (G) such that for all
k ≥ k0 we have βk (G) = kσ(G)+β0 (G); the number σ(G) is another well known
quantity of invariant theory: it is the minimal positive integer n such that for
any representation of G there exist homogeneous G-invariant polynomial functions of degree at most n such that their only common zero is the origin. (In the
special case when G = A is abelian, we have σ(A) = exp(A), the exponent of
A. We note also that for linearly reductive algebraic groups a related quantity
σ(G, V ) plays a significant role in constructive invariant theory, see [19] or [5].)
In Section 5 we establish some basic properties of σ(G) for G finite. They
are used to prove Theorem 7.1, stating that if G is non-cylic, then σ(G) ≤ |G|/q
for the minimal prime divisor of |G|, provided that char(F) does not divide |G|.
This is an easier but stronger variant for σ(G) of the main combined result on
β(G) proved in [2] and [3] (continuing the investigations of [20], [7], [21]).
2
Preliminaries
We need to recall some generalities on graded
L∞ modules. By a graded module here
we mean an L
N-graded module M =
d=0 Md over a commutative graded F∞
algebra R = d=0 Rd such that R0 = F is a field when R is unital and R0 = {0}
otherwise; in the latter case still we assume that M is an F-vector space, the
multiplication map is F-bilinear, and a submodule
is
L
Ls or an ideal by definition
M
,
and
R
:=
assumed to be a subspace. We set M≤s :=
R
d
+
d=0
d>0 d .
l
We write R+ for the lth power of the ideal R+ , and more generally, for subsets
A, B ⊂ R, AB stands for the F -subspace spanned by {ab | a ∈ A, b ∈ B}, and
hAi denotes the ideal in R generated by A. The subalgebra of R generated by
2
Ls
R≤s := d=0 Rd will be denoted by F[R≤s ].
The factor space M/R+ M inherits the grading. Define
β(M, R) := the top degree of M/R+ M
provided that M/R+ M has finitely many non-zero homogeneous components,
and write β(M, R) = ∞ otherwise. By the graded Nakayama Lemma β(M, R)
is the minimal non-negative integer s such that M = M≤s + M≤s R (i.e. M is
generated as an R-module by M≤s ), when M is generated in bounded degree.
In particular, the maximal degree of a homogeneous element of R+ not
2
belonging to R+
is
β(R) := β(R+ , R),
the minimal positive integer n such that R is generated as an F-algebra by
homogeneous elements of degree at most n.
Let M be a graded R-module. We define for any integer k ≥ 1
k
βk (M, R) := β(M, R+
)
The abbreviation
βk (R) := βk (R+ , R)
will also be used. In the special case k = 1 we recover β1 (M, R) = β(M, R) and
β1 (R) = β(R). Note the trivial inequality βk (R) ≤ kβ(R).
The graded modules and algebras we are interested in come from invariant
theory. We fix a base field F, and let G be a finite group whose order is invertible
in F. Take a G-module V , i.e. a finite dimensional F-vector space endowed with
a representation of G on V . The coordinate ring F[V ] is defined in abstract
terms as the symmetric tensor algebra of the dual space V ∗ . So F[V ] is a
polynomial ring in dim(V ) variables, hence in particular it is a graded ring with
F[V ]1 = V ∗ . The left action of G on V induces a natural right action on V ∗
given by xg (v) = x(gv) for any g ∈ G, v ∈ V and x ∈ V ∗ . This right action of
G on V ∗ extends to the symmetric tensor algebra F[V ]. The corresponding ring
of polynomial invariants is
F[V ]G := {f ∈ F[V ] : f g = f
∀g ∈ G}
and
β(G, V ) := β(F[V ]G )
is called the Noether number of the G-module V . We also set
βk (G, V ) := βk (F[V ]G )
for an arbitrary positive integer k, and
βk (G) := sup{βk (G, V ) | V is a finite dimensional G-module over F}.
We shall refer to these numbers as the generalized Noether numbers of the group
G.
3
The famous theorem of E. Noether asserts that β(G) := β1 (G) is bounded
by the order of G. When char(F) = 0 or char(F) > |G|, this was proved in [18].
The result was extended to non-modular positive characteristic independently
by Fleischmann [8] and Fogarty [10].
Convention 2.1. Throughout this paper F is our base field and G (or H) is a
finite group of order not divisible by char(F), unless explicitly stated otherwise.
By a G-module we mean a finite dimensional F-vector space endowed with a
linear action of G.
3
Lower bound for direct products
Lemma 3.1. For any G-module V there exists an irreducible G-module U such
that
βk (G, V ⊕ U ) ≥ βk (F[V ], F[V ]G ) + 1.
Proof. Write L := F[V ], R := F[V ]G and set d := βk (L, R). By complete
k
reducibility of the G-module Ld its submodule R+
L ∩ Ld has a direct complement, which is non-zero by the definition of d, hence it contains an irreducible G-submodule U . Choose a basis e1 , . . . , en in U and let ε1 , . . . , εn be
the corresponding dual basis in U ∗ . The matrix of g acting on U ∗ via the
contragredient representation
is the transpose of the inverse of the matrix of g
P
acting on U . Thus f := ni=1 ei εi , viewed as an element in the polynomial ring
F[V ⊕ U ] = F[V ] ⊗ F[ε1 , . . . , εn ], is a G-invariant of degree d + 1. We claim that
k+1
f 6∈ S+
where S := F[V ⊕U ]G . Note that the action of G on F[V ⊕U ] preserves
∗
the total degree both in the variables
to U ∗ . Suppose indiP belonging to V and
k+1
k
rectly that f ∈ S+ . Then f = j gj hj where gj ∈ R+ while hj ∈ S+ is linear
Pn
on U , i.e. hj = i=1 hj,i εi for some polynomials
equating the
P hj,i ∈ L. After
k
L, contradicting
coefficients of εi on both sides we get that ei = j gj hj,i ∈ R+
the choice of U .
Corollary 3.2. If V is a G-module such that βk (G, V ) = βk (G) then
βk (G, V ) = βk (F[V ], F[V ]G ) + 1.
Proof. For any G-module V it holds that βk (G, V ) ≤ βk (L, R) + 1 where L =
F[V ] and R = L
F[V ]G . Indeed, if f ∈ L has degree deg(f ) > βk (L, R) + 1
k
. Apply the transfer map τ : L → R,
then f ∈ L+ · ( d>βk (L,R) Ld ) ⊆ L+ R+
P
g
f 7→ g∈G f . It is a graded R-module epimorphism from L onto R (see for
k+1
example Chapter 1 in [1]). It follows that τ (f ) ∈ R+
, and on the other hand
τ (L) = R, hence the desired inequality follows. The reverse inequality is an
immediate consequence of Lemma 3.1.
Remark 3.3. Compare Corollary 3.2 with the formula Dk (A) = dk (A) + 1 in
Lemma 6.1.2 of [13], where dk (A) is the maximal length of a sequence over A
which is not divisible by the product of k zero-sum subsequences. It is not
difficult to show that dk (A) = supV βk (F[V ], F[V ]A ) where V ranges over all
A-modules, whereas βk (A) = Dk (A), as we mentioned in the introduction.
4
Theorem 3.4. For any integers r, s ≥ 1 and finite groups G, H we have the
inequality
βr+s−1 (G × H) ≥ βr (G) + βs (H) − 1.
Proof. If M and N are graded modules over the graded algebras R and S,
respectively, then:
βr+s−1 (M ⊗ N, R ⊗ S) ≥ βr (M, R) + βs (N, S)
(1)
r
s
Indeed, there are elements x ∈ Mβr (M,R) \ R+
M and y ∈ Nβs (N,S) \ S+
N.
r
Take an F-vector space basis B1 of R+ M , and extend B1 ∪ {x} to a basis B
s
of M . Similarly, let C1 be a basis of S+
N , and extend C1 ∪ {y} to a basis
C in N . Then A := {u ⊗ v | u ∈ B1 , v ∈ C or u ∈ B, v ∈ C1 } is a basis
r
s
of T := R+
M ⊗ N + M ⊗ S+
N . On the other hand A ∪ {x ⊗ y} is part of
the basis {u ⊗ v | u ∈ B, v ∈ C} of M ⊗ N , showing that x ⊗ y 6∈ T . But
T ⊇ (R ⊗ S)r+s−1
(M ⊗ N ) and deg(x ⊗ y) = βr (M, R) + βs (N, S), whence (1)
+
readily follows.
Now take a G-module V with βr (G, V ) = βr (G), and an H-module W with
βs (H, W ) = βs (H). Given that F[V ⊕ W ]G×H = F[V ]G ⊗ F[W ]H we have the
following sequence of inequalities:
βr+s−1 (G × H) − 1 ≥ βr+s−1 (F[V ⊕ W ], F[V ⊕ W ]G×H )
G
by Lemma 3.1
H
≥ βr (F[V ], F[V ] ) + βs (F[W ], F[W ] ) by (1)
= βr (G) + βs (H) − 2
by Corollary 3.2
Remark 3.5. In the special case G = A abelian we recover Lemma 6.1.4 from
[13].
4
The growth rate of βk (G)
In the study of the Noether bound for finite groups, the following inequalities
due to Schmid [20] in characteristic zero and extended to positive non-modular
characteristic by Sezer [21], Fleischmann [9], Knop [16] are very useful: For a
normal subgroup N in G and an arbitrary subgroup H in G we have β(G) ≤
[G : H]β(H) and β(G) ≤ β(N )β(G/N ). Our motivation to study βk (G) stems
from the following strengthening proved in [2]:
βk (G) ≤ ββk (G/N ) (N )
βk (G) ≤ βk[G:H] (H)
The estimates for β(G) obtained in terms of generalized Noether numbers of its
subquotient K using the latter inequalities are better than the estimates derived
from the original inequalitites, as soon as βk (K) is strictly smaller than kβ(K).
A partial theoretical explanation of the experience that indeed, typically βk (G)
is strictly smaller than kβ(G) and its extent is obtained in this section.
5
We start by studying in general for a fixed commutative graded F-algebra R
k+1
k
the behavior of βk (R) as a function of k. The surjection R+ /R+
→ R+ /R+
shows that βk (R) ≤ βk+1 (R) for all k. We note that βk (R) is not always a
strictly increasing function of k:
Example 4.1. Consider the ring R = F[a, b]/(b3 − a9 , ab2 − a7 ) and define a
2
3
grading by setting deg(a) = 1 and deg(b) = 3. Then b2 ∈ R+
\ R+
, and b2 spans
2
4
the degree 6 homogeneous component of R+ /R+ . In this case for all l ≥ 7 we
5
have that Rl ⊆ R+
, hence 6 = β2 (R) = β3 (R) = β4 (R).
On the other hand, for a fixed G-module V , βk (G, V ) is unbounded because
of the following trivial observation:
Lemma 4.2. βk (R) as a function of k is bounded if and only if there is an
integer n such that Ri = {0} for all i ≥ n.
L
n+1
n+1
,
Proof. Note that R+
⊆ d≥n+1 Rd . Hence if Rn 6= {0}, then Rn * R+
implying βn (R) ≥ n. Conversely, if Ri = {0} for all i ≥ n then βi (R) < n.
Lemma 4.3. For any positive integers r ≤ k we have the inequality
βk (R) ≤
k
βr (R).
r
Proof. Suppose to the contrary that βk (R) > kr βr (R). Then there exist homogeneous elements f1 , . . . , fl ∈ R+ such that l ≤ k, f := f1 · · · fl is not contained
l+1
in R+
, and deg(f ) > kr βr (R) (this forces that l > r). We may suppose that
deg(f1 ) ≥ · · · ≥ deg(fl ). Then
deg(fr+1 ) + · · · + deg(fl )
deg(f1 ) + · · · + deg(fr )
≥ deg(fr ) ≥ deg(fr+1 ) ≥
r
l−r
hence
deg(f1 · · · fr ) ≥
r
r
deg(f1 . . . fl ) ≥ deg(f ) > βr (R).
l
k
r+1
l+1
It follows that h := f1 · · · fr ∈ R+
, hence f = hfr+1 · · · fl ∈ R+
, a contradiction.
By Lemma 4.3 the sequence βkk(R) is monotonically decreasing, and as it
is also non-negative, it must converge to a certain limit. Our next goal will
be to clarify what is the value of this limit. For a graded finitely generated
commutative F-algebra R with R0 = F set
σ(R) := min{d ∈ N : R is finitely generated as a module over F[R≤d ]}
Equivalently, σ(R) is the minimal integer d such that β(R+ , F[R≤d ]) is finite.
Proposition 4.4. Let R be a finitely generated commutative graded F-algebra.
For any positive integer k we have βk (R) ≥ kσ(R).
6
Proof. It is well known that given a set h1 , . . . , hs ∈ R of homogeneous elements,
R is a finitely
generated module over its subalgebra F[h1 , . . . , hs ] if and only if
p
R+ =
hh1 , . . . , hs i, the radical of the ideal generated by the hi . If R is
finite dimensional then σ(R) = 0 and our statement obviously holds. Suppose
dim
F (R) = ∞, hence σ(R) > 0. By definition
qL
q L of t := σ(R) we have R+ 6=
t−1
t
h d=1 Rd i, on the other hand R+ = h d=1 Rd i, hence there exists an
qL
k+1
k+1
k
f ∈ Rt with f ∈
/ h t−1
/ R+
. Indeed, f k ∈ R+
d=1 Rd i. We claim that f ∈
L
t−1
would imply f k ∈ h d=1 Rd i, contrary to the choice of f . Thus βk (R) ≥
k
deg(f ) = kσ(R).
By definition of σ(R) the number
η(R) := β(R+ , F[R≤σ(R) ])
is finite. Moreover, any homogeneous element f ∈ R with deg(f ) > η(R)
Lσ(R)
belongs to the ideal ( d=1 Rd ) · R+ , hence β(R) ≤ η(R) and more generally,
by induction on k one obtains
βk (R) ≤ (k − 1)σ(R) + η(R).
We know from Lemma 4.2 that an integer k0 exists such that βk (R) ≥ η(R) −
σ(R) holds for any k ≥Pk0 . Hence if deg(f ) > βk (R) + σ(R) then f ∈ R can
be written in the form i gi hi where 0 < deg(gi ) ≤ σ(R) and deg(hi ) > βk (R),
k+1
k+2
whence hi ∈ R+
and f ∈ R+
. This argument shows that for any k ≥ k0 we
have
βk+1 (R) ≤ βk (R) + σ(R)
(2)
This simple observation immediately leads us to the following result:
Proposition 4.5. Let R be a finitely generated commutative graded F-algebra.
Then there are non-negative integers k0 (R) and β0 (R) such that
βk (R) = kσ(R) + β0 (R)
for every k > k0 (R).
Proof. Consider the sequence of integers ak := βk (R) − kσ(R), where k =
k0 , k0 + 1, . . . and βk0 (R) ≥ η(R) − σ(R). By (2) it is monotonically decreasing
and by Proposition 4.4 it is non-negative, therefore it stabilizes after finitely
many steps, and this is what has been claimed.
For any G-module V we write
σ(G, V ) := σ(F[V ]G ).
This quantity was much studied for G a linearly reductive group (see e.g. [5] or
[19]) and has the following well-known interpretation by the Hilbert Nullstellensatz:
7
Proposition 4.6. σ(G, V ) is the minimal positive integer n such that there
exists a subset of F[V ]G
+ consisting of homogeneous elements with degree at most
n, whose common zero locus in F̄ ⊗F V is {0} (where F̄ stands for the algebraic
closure of F).
Supposing |G| ∈ F× we have σ(G, V ) ≤ β(G, V ) ≤ |G|, and define
σ(G) := sup{σ(G, V ) | V is a G-module}.
(In fact the inequality σ(G) ≤ |G| holds in the modular case char(F) | |G| as
well, see Remark 5.6 (ii).) As an immediate corollary of Proposition 4.5 we
obtain that for any G-module V there exist non-negative integers k0 (G, V ) and
β0 (G, V ) such that for all k ≥ k0 (G, V ) we have βk (G, V ) = kσ(G, V )+β0 (G, V ).
In characteristic zero the following can be proved:
Corollary 4.7. Suppose char(F) = 0 and let G be a finite group. There exist
non-negative integers k0 (G) and β0 (G) such that for all k ≥ k0 (G) we have
βk (G) = kσ(G) + β0 (G).
In particular,
βk (G)
= σ(G).
k→∞
k
lim
Proof. Denoting by Vreg the regular representation of G, we have that βk (G) =
βk (G, Vreg ) holds for all k by the same argument as in the proof of the special
case k = 1 in [20] based on Weyl’s theorem on polarization (cf. [22]). Hence the
statement holds by Proposition 4.5.
Remark 4.8. As we mentioned in the Introduction, Corollary 4.7 in the special
case when G = A is abelian is due to M. Freeze and W. A. Schmid [11], and
Delorme, Ordaz and Quiroz [4]. For some results on η(A) see e.g. [13] ch. 5.7.
5
Some basic properties of σ(G)
In this section we collect some basic statements about σ(G) that we will need
to prove Theorem 7.1.
Lemma 5.1. Let V1 , ..., Vn be any G-modules and W = V1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Vn . Then
n
σ(G, W ) = max σ(G, Vi )
i=1
In particular σ(G) = maxU σ(G, U ) where U ranges over all isomorphism classes
of irreducible G-modules.
Proof. Let R = F[W ]G and denote by Si the subalgebra of F[Vi ]G generated by its elements of degree at most σ(G, Vi ). As F[W ] = ⊗ni=1 F[Vi ] is obviously finitely generated as a ⊗ni=1 Si -module, and ⊗ni=1 Si ⊆ F[R≤d ] where
d := maxni=1 σ(G, Vi ), it follows that σ(G, W ) ≤ d.
8
For the reverse inequality let T = F[Vi ]G for a fixed i and observe that the restriction to Vi gives a graded algebra surjection ψ : R → T . Hence the image under ψ of a finite set of module generators of R over its subalgebra F[R≤σ(R) ] must
generate T = ψ(R) as a module over its subalgebra ψ(F[R≤σ(R) ]) = F[T≤σ(R) ],
as well. In particular σ(G, Vi ) ≤ σ(G, W ).
Remark 5.2. The number σ(F[W ]G ) when G is a linearly reductive group
acting algebraically on W plays important role in finding explicit upper bounds
for β(F[W ]G ), see [19] and [5]. Lemma 5.1 is special for finite groups, and does
not hold in general for reductive algebraic groups, when it may well happen that
F[V ]G = F, but F[V ⊕ · · · ⊕ V ]G contains non-constant elements (for example,
take as V the natural module Fn over G = SLn (F)).
For an abelian group A denote by exp(A) the least common multiple of the
orders of the elements of A.
Corollary 5.3. Let A be an abelian group and suppose that F is algebraically
closed of characteristic not dividing |A|. Then
σ(A) = exp(A).
Proof. Lemma 5.1 asserts that σ(A) = maxU σ(A, U ) where U runs through the
irreducible representations of A. These are all 1-dimensional, and if U ∗ = hxi
then F[x]A = F[xe ] where e ∈ N is the order of the character chari : A → F×
defined by xa = chari(a)x (a ∈ A). This readily implies our claim, as A ∼
= Â,
where  := homZ (A, F× ) is the group of characters of A.
Lemma 5.4. Let N be a normal subgroup of G and V a G-module. Then
σ(G, V ) ≤ σ(G/N )σ(N, V ).
Lσ(N,V )
N
Proof. Set W :=
F[V ]N
d and denote by S the subalgebra of F[V ]
d=1
generated by W . Then S is a finite module over its finitely generated subalgebra S G/N = S G , and F[V ]N is a finite S-module, thus F[V ]N is a finite, hence
noetherian S G -module, implying in turn that its submodule F[V ]G is also a finite
S G -module. Write π for the F-algebra surjection F[W ∗ ] → S induced by the natural isomorphism between the linear component (W ∗ )∗ of the polynomial ring
F[W ∗ ] and W ⊂ F[V ]N . By linear reductivity of G/N , π maps F[W ∗ ]G/N onto
Lσ(G/N,W ∗ )
G/N
S G . Let T be the F-subalgebra of F[W ∗ ] generated by d=1
F[W ∗ ]d .
Then F[W ∗ ]G/N is a finite T -module, implying that S G is a finite π(T )-module,
and thus F[V ]G is a finite π(T )-module. Since by construction π(T ) is generated by elements of degree at most σ(N, V )σ(G/N, W ∗ ), the desired inequality
follows.
Lemma 5.5. Let G be a finite group, H a subgroup of G, and V a G-module.
Then
σ(H, V ) ≤ σ(G, V ) ≤ [G : H]σ(H, V ).
9
Proof. The first inequality is trivial. By Proposition 4.6 there are homogeneous
elements f1 , . . . , fr ∈ F[V ]H of degree at most σ(H, V ) suchQthat the common
zero locus of f1 , . . . , fr in F̄ ⊗ V is {0}. The formula 0 = g (fi − fig ) where
[G:H]
g ranges over a set of right H-coset representatives in G shows that fi
[G:H]
) ≤
is contained in the ideal of F[V ] generated by F[V ]G
+ . Since deg(fi
L[G:H]σ(H,V )
[G : H]σ(H, V ), it follows that the common zero locus of d=1
F[V ]G
d is
[G:H]
| i = 1, . . . , r}. Consequently,
contained in the common zero locus {0} of {fi
again by Proposition 4.6, F[V ]G is a finitely generated module over its subalgebra
generated by the homogeneous components F[V ]G
d with d ≤ [G : H]σ(H, V ).
Remark 5.6. (i) The statement and proof of Lemma 5.4 remain valid under
the weaker assumption that [G : N ] is not divisible by char(F).
(ii) The statement and proof of Lemma 5.5 remain valid in the modular case
char(F) | |G|. When H = {1} is the trivial subgroup, we obtain the inequality
σ(G, V ) ≤ |G|.
Lemma 5.4 and Lemma 5.5 have the folowing immediate corollary:
Corollary 5.7. For any subquotient K of G we have
σ(K)
σ(G)
≤
|G|
|K|
Remark 5.8. Lemma 5.4 and Lemma 5.5 are the analogues for σ of the reduction lemmata for β in [20] mentioned at the beginning of Section 4. For a
variant of these statements concerning separating invariants see Section 3.9.4 in
[6], [15], and [17].
6
σ(G) for some semidirect products
We need some facts and terminology relating zero-sum sequences over A = Zp ,
the group of prime order p, written additively. See for example [12] as a general
reference to this topic. Recall that by a sequence over A we mean a sequence
S = (s1 , ..., sd ) of elements si ∈ A where the order of the elements is disregarded
Pd
and repetition is allowed. We say that S is a zero-sum sequence if i=1 si =
0 ∈ A. Denote by supp(S) the set of elements of A that occur in S.
Lemma 6.1. For any non-empty subset S ⊆ Zp \ {0} there exists a zero-sum
sequence T of length at most p with supp(T ) = S.
Proof. Let s1 , . . . , sk denote the elements of S. If s1 + · · · + sk = 0, then the
sequence T := (s1 , . . . , sk ) satisfies the requirements. Otherwise for i = 1, . . . k
denote ni the unique element in {1, . . . , p − 1} with ni si = −(s1 + · · · + sk ) ∈ Zp .
The ni are distinct, hence the smallest among them, say n1 ≤ p − k. Then the
sequence T := (s1 , . . . , s1 , s2 , . . . , sk ) (where the multiplicity of s1 is n1 + 1)
satisfies the requirements.
10
Proposition 6.2. Let G = Zp ⋊ Zd be a semidirect product of cyclic groups,
where p is a prime, d is a divisor of p−1, and Zd acts faithfully (via conjugation)
on Zp . Then we have σ(G) = p.
Proof. We know that σ(G) ≥ σ(Zp ) = p by Lemma 5.5 and Corollary 5.3. By
Lemma 5.1 it is enough to prove that σ(G, U ) ≤ p, where U is an irreducible Gmodule. Since σ(G) is not sensitive for extending the base field, we may assume
that F is algebraically closed. Denote by A the maximal normal subgroup
Zp of G. Then G has only two types of irreducible representations: if U is
1-dimensional with A in its kernel, then σ(G, U ) ≤ |G/A| = |Zd | ≤ p − 1.
Otherwise U is induced from a non-trivial 1-dimensional A-module. In this case
we may choose variables x1 , . . . , xd in F[U ] such that the xi are A-eigenvectors
permuted up to scalar multiples by G, and denoting by θi ∈ Â := homZ (A, F× )
the corresponding character of A (i.e. xai = θi (a)x for all a ∈ A), the set
O := {θ1 , . . . , θd } is a G/A-orbit in  (on which G acts in the standard way).
αd
1
For a monomial m = xα
∈ F[U ] denote by Φ(m) the sequence over
1 . . . xd
 containing θi with multiplicity αi for i = 1, . . . , d, and no other elements.
Obviously m is A-invariant if and only if Φ(m) is a zero-sum sequence.
For every k ≤ |O| we choose representatives Sk,1 , ..., Sk,rk from each G/Aorbit of the k-element subsets of O. By Lemma 6.1 we can assign to each of them
an A-invariant monomial mSk,i ∈ F[U ] with support supp(Φ(mSk,i )) = Sk,i and
degree at most p. Now consider the polynomials:
fk =
rk
X
X
mgSk,i
for k = 1, ..., |O|
i=1 g∈G/A
They are all G-invariants, moreover, it is easily checked that their common zero
locus is {0}. Indeed, if the vector u = (u1 , ..., u|O| ) ∈ F̄ ⊗ U ∼
= F̄d belongs
to this common zero locus, and if the set S = {i : ui 6= 0} has cardinality
k > 0 then 0 = fk (u) = c · mS (u) for some divisor c of d. It follows that
mS (u) = 0, implying that uj = 0 for an index j ∈ S, which is a contradiction.
Consequently F[U ]G is finitely generated over F[f1 , ..., f|O| ] by Proposition 4.6,
hence σ(G, U ) ≤ maxk deg(fk ) ≤ p.
Proposition 6.3. Let G = A ⋊ Z2 be a semidirect product where A is a nontrivial abelian group on which Z2 acts by inversion. Then σ(G) = exp(A).
Proof. By Lemma 5.1 we know that σ(G) = max σ(G, U ) where U is an irreducible G-module. As above, we may assume that F is algebraically closed.
If U is 1-dimensional, then σ(G, U ) ≤ σ(G/G′ ), where G′ is the commutator
subgroup of G. It is easy to see that G/G′ is an elementary abelian 2-group,
whence σ(G/G′ ) = exp(G/G′ ) = 2 ≤ exp(A). If the irreducible G-module U is
not 1-dimensional, then F[U ]1 = U ∗ = hx, yi where xa = θ(a)x for any a ∈ A
and some character θ ∈ Â, and y a = θ(a)−1 y; moreover x and y are exchanged
by the generator b of Z2 . Let e denote the order of θ in Â; evidently e ≤ exp A.
Now it is easily seen that F[U ]G ⊇ F[xe + y e , xy], whence σ(G, U ) ≤ max{e, 2}.
11
Thus we proved the inequality σ(G) ≤ exp(A). For the reverse inequality note
that σ(G) ≥ σ(A) by the first inequality in Lemma 5.5.
7
An improved general bound on σ(G)
In this section we give an improvement for non-cyclic G of the general inequality
σ(G) ≤ |G|.
Theorem 7.1. If G is non-cyclic and q is the smallest prime divisor of |G|,
then
|G|
σ(G) ≤
q
Proof. If G has a subquotient isomorphic to Zp × Zp for some prime p then by
Corollary 5.7 and Corollary 5.3 we get that:
1
σ(Zp × Zp )
σ(G)
=
≤
|G|
p2
p
and we are done. Note that for a non-cyclic p-group P , the factor group P/Φ(P )
(where Φ(P ) is the Frattini subgroup of P ) contains a subgroup isomorphic to
Zp × Zp . So it remains to deal with the case when all Sylow subgroups of G are
cyclic. Then by a well known theorem of Burnside G is the semidirect product
of cyclic groups, and necessarily contains as a subquotient a non-abelian semidirect product Zp ⋊ Zq , where p, q are primes, q dividing p − 1 (see for example
[2] for references and details). Therefore by Corollary 5.7 and Proposition 6.2
we conclude σ(G)/|G| ≤ σ(Zp ⋊ Zq )/pq = 1/q.
Remark 7.2. Theorem 7.1 is sharp for example for the abelian group Znq × Zq
or for a non-abelian semi-direct product Zn ⋊ Zq .
Theorem 7.1 is a variant for σ(G) of the main combined result of [2] and
[3] concerning β(G). The present result for σ(G) is easier, but the conclusion
is stronger. We finish by stating a corresponding conjectured statement for the
Noether number:
Conjecture 7.3. Let Cq denote the set of isomorphism classes of non-cyclic
finite groups of order not divisible by char(F) and with smallest prime divisor q.
Then
1
β(G)
=
lim sup
|G|
q
G∈Cq
The case q = 2 holds by [2] and [3]. For q > 2 the conjecture is open.
Acknowledgement
We thank the referees for helpful comments on the manuscript.
12
References
[1] D. J. Benson, Polynomial Invariants of Finite Groups, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[2] K. Cziszter and M. Domokos, Groups with large Noether bound,
arXiv:1105.0679v4 .
[3] K. Cziszter and M. Domokos, Noether’s bound for the groups with a
cyclic subgroup of index two, arXiv:1205.3011v1.
[4] Ch. Delorme, O. Ordaz, and D. Quiroz, Some remarks on Davenport
constant, Discrete Math. 237 (2001), 119-128.
[5] H. Derksen, Polynomial bounds for rings of invariants, Proc. Amer.
Math. Soc. 129 (2001), 955-963.
[6] H. Derksen and G. Kemper, Computational Invariant Theory, SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 2002.
[7] M. Domokos and P. Hegedűs, Noether’s bound for polynomial invariants
of finite groups, Arch. Math. 74 (2000), 161-167.
[8] P. Fleischmann, The Noether bound in invariant theory of finite groups,
Adv. Math. 156 (2000), 23-32.
[9] P. Fleischmann, On invariant theory of finite groups, in ”Invariant Theory in All Characteristics”, (Ed.: H. E. A. Eddy Campbell and D. L.
Wehlau), CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes 35, Amer. Math. Soc.,
Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 43-69, 2004.
[10] J. Fogarty, On Noether’s bound for polynomial invariants of a finite
group, Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (2001), 5-7.
[11] M. Freeze and W. A. Schmid, Remarks on a generalization of the Davenport constant, Discrete Mathematics 310 (2010) 3373-3389.
[12] W. Gao and A. Geroldinger, Zero-sum problems in finite abelian groups:
A survey, Expo. Math. 24 (2006), 337-369.
[13] A. Geroldinger and F. Halter-Koch, Non-unique factorizations. Algebraic, combinatorial and analytic theory, Monographs and Textbooks
in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006.
[14] F. Halter-Koch, A generalization of Davenport’s constant and its arithmetical applications, Colloquium Mathematicum 63 (1992), 203-210.
[15] G. Kemper, Separating invariants, J. Symbolic Computation 44 (2009),
1212-1222.
13
[16] F. Knop, On Noether’s and Weyl’s bound in positive characteristic, in
”Invariant Theory in All Characteristics”, (Ed.: H. E. A. Eddy Campbell and D. L. Wehlau), CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes 35, Amer.
Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 175-188, 2004.
[17] M. Kohls and H. Kraft, Degree bounds for separating invariants, Math.
Res. Lett. 17 (2010), 1171-1182.
[18] E. Noether, Der Endlichkeitssatz der Invarianten endlicher Gruppen,
Math. Ann. 77 (1916), 89-92.
[19] V. Popov, The constructive theory of invariants, Math. USSR Izvest.
10 (1982), 359-376.
[20] B. J. Schmid, Finite groups and invariant theory, “Topics in Invariant
Theory”, Lect. Notes in Math. 1478 (1991), 35-66.
[21] M. Sezer, Sharpening the generalized Noether bound in the invariant
theory of finite groups, J. Algebra 254 (2002), 252-263.
[22] H. Weyl, The Classical Groups, Princeton University Press, Princeton,
1939.
14
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1710.00502v1 [math.ST] 2 Oct 2017
Bivariate Exponentiated Generalized Linear Exponential
Distribution with Applications in Reliability Analysis
Mohamed Ibrahim1 , M. S. Eliwa2,∗, M. El- Morshedy2
1
Department of Applied Statistics and Insurance,
Faculty of Commerce, Damietta University, Damietta, Egypt.
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science,
Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
[email protected]
[email protected]
mah [email protected]
Abstract
The aim of this paper, is to define a bivariate exponentiated generalized linear exponential distribution based on Marshall-Olkin shock model. Statistical and reliability
properties of this distribution are discussed. This includes quantiles, moments, stressstrength reliability, joint reliability function, joint reversed (hazard) rates functions
and joint mean waiting time function. Moreover, the hazard rate, the availability and
the mean residual lifetime functions for a parallel system, are established. One data
set is analyzed, and it is observed that, the proposed distribution provides a better
fit than Marshall-Olkin bivariate exponential, bivariate generalized exponential and
bivariate generalized linear failure rate distributions. Simulation studies are presented
to estimate both the relative absolute bias, and the relative mean square error for the
distribution parameters based on complete data.
Key words: Joint probability density function, Joint reversed (hazard) rates functions, Joint mean waiting time function, Simulation studies.
1
Introduction
Sarhan et al. (2013) introduced exponentiated generalized linear exponential distribution
(EGLED), which generalized a lot of probability distributions such as exponential (E), generalized exponential (GE), linear exponential (LE), generalized linear failure rate (GLFR),
generalized linear exponential (GLE) distributions, among others. Furthermore, the EGLED
provides more flexibility to analyze real data sets such as Leukemia data, drug data, among
others.
∗ Corresponding
author: [email protected]
1
In many scientific practical situations, multivariate lifetime data arise frequently, so it
is important to consider different multivariate models that could be used to model such
multivariate lifetime data. Such these models are interesting in several applications, such
as reliability engineering, industrial engineering and computer systems. So, the aim of this
paper is to introduce a bivariate exponentiated generalized linear exponential distribution
(BEGLED) based on Marshall-Olkin shock model (1967), whose marginal distributions are
EGLED. In the mentioned applications of the bivariate distribution, could be the lifetimes of
two components, the magnitudes of stress and strength components and drought intensities.
A lot of bivariate distributions based on Marshall-Olkin model are studied by many authors,
see Sarhan and Balakrishnan (2007), Al- Khedhairi and El-Gohary (2008), Kundu and
Gupta (2009), Sarhan et al. (2011), Kundu and Gupta (2013), Balakrishna and Shiji (2014),
El-Gohary et al. (2016), Rasool and Akbar (2016) and El-Bassiouny et al. (2016).
The random variable X is said to have EGLED(a, b, α, θ) if its CDF is
θ
α
FX (x) = 1 − e−η (x) ; x ≥ 0,
(1)
where η(x) = ax + 2b x2 , the parameters a, b ≥ 0 such that a + b > 0 and α, θ > 0.
The parameters a and b are scale parameters, while α and θ are shape parameters.
2
The BEGLED and Its Marginal Functions
Assume Ui ∼ EGLED(α, a, b, θi ), i = 1, 2, 3 are three independent random variables. Define
Xk = max{Uk , U3 } ; k = 1, 2. So, the bivariate vector (X1 , X2 ) has the BEGLED with
parameters vector Φ =(α, a, b, θ1 , θ2 , θ3 ). The joint CDF of (X1 , X2 ) is
θ3
θ2
θ1
α
α
α
, z = min(x1 , x2 ).
1 − e−η (z)
1 − e−η (x2 )
FX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ) = 1 − e−η (x1 )
(2)
Also, we can get the joint PDF of (X1 , X2 ) as follows
if 0 < x1 < x2
f1 (x1 , x2 )
fX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ) =
f2 (x1 , x2 )
if 0 < x2 < x1
f3 (x, x)
if x1 = x2 = x,
(3)
where
(x1 )+η α (x2 ))
1 − e−η
α
(x2 )
α−1 −(η α (x1 )+η α (x2 ))
1 − e−η
α
(x1 )
f1 (x1 , x2 ) = ϕ2 [η(x1 )η(x2 )]α−1 e−(η
f2 (x1 , x2 ) = ϕ1 [η(x1 )η(x2 )]
α
e
and
f3 (x, x) = αθ3 (a + bx)η α−1 (x)e−η
where
2
α
(x)
1 − e−η
α
θ2 −1
1 − e−η
α
(x1 )
θ1 −1
1 − e−η
α
(x2 )
(x)
θ1 +θ2 +θ3 −1
,
θ1 +θ3 −1
,
θ2 +θ3 −1
,
ϕi = α2 θ i (θ 3−i + θ3 )(a + bx1 )(a + bx2 ) ,
i = 1, 2.
On the other hand, the marginal CDFs for the BEGLED can be represented as follows
θi +θ3
α
, i = 1, 2.
FXi (xi ) = 1 − e−η (xi )
(4)
Therefore, we can get the marginal PDFs for the BEGLED as follows
f (xi ) = α(θi + θ 3 )(a + bxi )η α−1 (xi )e−η
3
α
(xi )
θi +θ3 −1
α
1 − e−η (xi )
, i = 1, 2.
(5)
Statistical Properties
3.1
The median of the BEGLED
Domma (2009) presented the median correlation coefficient MX1 ,X2 as a form
MX1 ,X2 = 4FX1 ,X2 (MX1 , MX2 ) − 1,
(6)
where MX1 and MX2 denote the median of X1 and X2 respectively.
If X1 ∼ EGLED(α, a, b, θ1 + θ3 ) and X2 ∼ EGLED(α, a, b, θ2 + θ3 ) then
v
u
!# α1
"
1
( θ +θ
)
u
3
i
1
1
t
i = 1, 2.
MXi = −a + a2 + 2b − ln 1 −
,
b
2
So, the coefficient of median correlation between X1 and X2 is
(
θ2
θ1 +θ3
α
α
4 1 − e−η (MX2 )
1 − e−η (MX1 )
−1
MX1 ,X2 =
θ2 +θ3
α
α
θ1
4 1 − e−η (MX1 )
1 − e−η (MX2 )
−1
if x1 < x2
if x1 > x2 .
(7)
(8)
Equation (8) can be used to generate a bivariate data.
3.2
The mathematical expectation
We can derive the marginal expectation (rth moment) of Xi when Xi ∼ EGLED(α, a, b, θi +
θ3 ) such that i = 1, 2 as follows
E(Xir
)=
Z∞
xri fXi (xi )dxi ,
(9)
0
by using Equation (5), Maclaurin expansion, binomial expansion and gamma function, we
get
E(Xir ) =
∞ α−1
∞
X
XX
j=0 k=0 l=0
where
3
(l)
ζ j,k (a + bΘ)Γ(Θ),
(10)
(l)
(l)
ζ j,k
=
Θ
=
(−1)j ak Uj
α (θi + θ 3 )
l!
r + l + 2α − k − 1,
and
(l)
Uj =
3.3
α−k−1
b
α − 1 θ i + θ3 − 1
,
2
k
j
dl
(exp(−(j + 1)η α (xi ) + xi ))|xi =0 .
dxli
The conditional probability density functions
The conditional probability density function of Xi given Xj = xj , (i, j = 1, 2, i 6= j) is given
by
(1)
fXi |Xj (xi | xj ) if xi > xj > 0
fXi |Xj (xi | xj ) =
where
(2)
fXi |Xj (xi | xj )
f (3) (xi | xj )
Xi |Xj
(1)
| xj ) = αθi (a + bxi )η α−1 (xi )e−η
(2)
| xj ) =
fXi |Xj (xi
α
(xi )
if xi = xj > 0,
θi −1
α
,
1 − e−η (xi )
α
fXi |Xj (xi
αθj (θ i + θ3 )(a + bxi )η α−1 (xi )e−η (xi ) 1 − e−η
α
(θj + θ3 )(1 − e−η (xj ) )θ3
and
(3)
fXi |Xj (xi | xj ) =
(11)
if xj > xi > 0
α
(xi ) θ i +θ3 −1
,
iθi
α
θ3 h
1 − e−η (xi ) .
θj + θ 3
Equation (11) can be getting by substituting from Equations (3) and (5) in the following
relation
fXi ,Xj (xi , xj )
fXi |Xj (xi | xj ) =
, (i 6= j = 1, 2).
(12)
fXj (xj )
3.4
The distributions of T = max(X1 , X2 ) and S = min(X1 , X2 )
In the mentioned applications X1 and X2 could be exchange rates in two time periods. So,
it is important to get the distributions of T and S. If the bivariate vector (X1 , X2 ) has the
BEGLED then
FT (t) =
=
=
P (max(X1 , X2 ) ≤ t)
P (max(U1 , U3 ) ≤ t, max(U2 , U3 ) ≤ t)
FEGLED (α, a, b, θ1 + θ 2 + θ 3 ).
(13)
Also, we can get the distribution of S as follows
FS (t)
= P (min(X1 , X2 ) ≤ t)
= P (X1 < t) + P (X2 < t) − P (X1 < t, X2 < t, )
= FEGLED (α, a, b, θ1 + θ3 ) + FEGLED (α, a, b, θ2 + θ3 )
−FEGLED (α, a, b, θ1 + θ 2 + θ 3 ).
4
(14)
4
Reliability Properties
In this section, we present the stress-strength reliability, the joint reliability function, the
joint reversed (hazard) functions and the joint of mean waiting time function. Also, we
present the hazard rate, the availability and the mean residual lifetime functions for a
parallel system with two components.
4.1
Stress-strength reliability
Let X1 is a random variable represents stress, and X2 is a random variable represents
strength, and the random vector (X1 , X2 ) has the BEGLED then, the reliability function
R is
R =
=
=
4.2
P [X1 < X2 ]
P (U1 < U3 < U2 ) + P (U3 < U1 < U2 )
θ2 + θ3
.
θ1 + θ2 + 2θ3
(15)
The joint reliability function
Assume (X1 , X2 ) be two dimensional random variable with CDF FX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ), and the
marginal functions are FX1 (x1 ) and FX2 (x2 ) then, the joint reliability function RX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ) is
RX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ) = 1 − FX1 (x1 ) − FX2 (x2 ) + FX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ).
(16)
Assume the random vector (X1 , X2 ) has the BEGLED then, the joint reliability function of
(X1 , X2 ) is given by
R1 (x1 , x2 ) if 0 < x1 < x2
R2 (x1 , x2 ) if 0 < x2 < x1
RX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ) =
(17)
R3 (x, x)
if x1 = x2 = x,
where
R1 (x1 , x2 ) =
R2 (x1 , x2 ) =
R3 (x, x)
=
θ2 +θ3
θ1 +θ3
α
α
− 1 − e−η (x2 )
1 − 1 − e−η (x1 )
θ1 +θ3
θ2
α
α
,
1 − e−η (x1 )
+ 1 − e−η (x2 )
θ2 +θ3
θ1 +θ3
α
α
− 1 − e−η (x2 )
1 − 1 − e−η (x1 )
θ2 +θ3
θ1
α
α
,
1 − e−η (x2 )
+ 1 − e−η (x1 )
θ2 +θ3
θ1 +θ3
α
α
− 1 − e−η (x)
1 − 1 − e−η (x)
θ1 +θ2 +θ3
α
.
+ 1 − e−η (x)
5
4.3
4.3.1
The joint reversed (hazard) rate functions
The joint hazard rate function and its marginal functions
Assume (X1 , X2 ) be two dimensional random variable with PDF fX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ), and reliability function RX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ). Basu (1971) defined the bivariate hazard rate function
as
fX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 )
h(x1 , x2 ) =
.
(18)
RX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 )
So, the bivariate hazard rate function for the random vector (X1 , X2 ) which has the BEGLED is
if 0 < x1 < x2
h1 (x1 , x2 )
(19)
hX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ) =
h2 (x1 , x2 )
if 0 < x2 < x1
h3 (x, x)
if x1 = x2 = x,
where
h1 (x1 , x2 ) =
h2 (x1 , x2 ) =
ϕ2 [η(x1 )η(x2 )]
α−1 −(η α (x1 )+η α (x2 ))
e
θ 1 +θ 3
1 − (Ψ(x1 ))
ϕ1 [η(x1 )η(x2 )]
e
and
h3 (x, x) =
− (Ψ(x2 ))
θ2 +θ3
αθ3 (a + bx)η α−1 (x)e−η
α
(x)
(Ψ(x2 ))θ2 −1 (Ψ(x1 ))
+ (Ψ(x2 ))
α−1 −(η α (x1 )+η α (x2 ))
θ 1 +θ 3
1 − (Ψ(x1 ))
− (Ψ(x2 ))
θ2 +θ3
(Ψ(x1 ))
θ2
(Ψ(x1 ))
θ1 −1
+ (Ψ(x1 ))
θ1
θ1 +θ3 −1
θ1 +θ3
(Ψ(x2 ))
(Ψ(x2 ))
(Ψ(x))θ1 +θ2 +θ3 −1
1 − (Ψ(x))θ1 +θ3 − (Ψ(x))θ2 +θ3 + (Ψ(x))θ1 +θ2 +θ3
,
θ2 +θ3 −1
θ2 +θ3
,
,
α
where Ψ(.) = 1 − e−η (.) .
Also, the marginal hazard rate functions hi (xi ), i = 1, 2 of the BEGLED are
hi (xi ) =
4.3.2
α(θ i + θ3 )(a + bxi )η α−1 (xi )e−η
1 − (Ψ(xi ))
α
(xi )
θ i +θ3 −1
(Ψ(xi ))
θi +θ3
, i = 1, 2.
(20)
The joint reversed hazard rate function and its marginal functions
Assume (X1 , X2 ) be two dimensional random variable with CDF FX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ), the joint
reversed hazard rate function is
r(x1 , x2 ) =
fX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 )
.
FX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 )
(21)
So, the joint reversed hazard rate function for the random vector (X1 , X2 ) which has the
BEGLED is
if 0 < x1 < x2
r1 (x1 , x2 )
r2 (x1 , x2 )
if 0 < x2 < x1
rX1 ,X2 (x1 , x2 ) =
(22)
r3 (x, x)
if x1 = x2 = x,
where
6
r1 (x1 , x2 ) =
α−1
α
α
α−1
α
α
ϕ2 [η(x1 )η(x2 )]
e−(η (x1 )+η (x2 ))
,
α (x )
−η
2
1 − e−ηα (x1 )
1−e
ϕ [η(x1 )η(x2 )]
e−(η (x1 )+η (x2 ))
r2 (x1 , x2 ) = 1
,
α
1 − e−η (x2 ) 1 − e−ηα (x1 )
and
r3 (x, x) =
αθ3 (a + bx)η α−1 (x)e−η
1 − e−ηα (x)
α
(x)
.
Also, the marginal reversed hazard rate functions ri (xi ), i = 1, 2 to the BEGLED are
4.4
α(θ i + θ3 )(a + bxi )η α−1 (xi )e−η
ri (xi ) =
1 − e−ηα (xi )
α
(xi )
, i = 1, 2.
(23)
The joint mean waiting time and its marginal functions
The waiting time is closely related to important random variable reversed hazard rate function, which the failure occurs in the interval [0, t]. The observations of waiting times can
be used for prediction the distribution function. So, one of the most important applications
of the waiting time is to describe different maintenance strategies to any system. The joint
mean waiting time function Mw (t1 , t2 ) is defined as follows
Z t1 Z t2
1
F (x1 , x2 ) dx2 dx1 .
(24)
Mw (t1 , t2 ) =
F (t1 , t2 ) 0
0
Assume the random vector (X1 , X2 ) has the BEGLED. Using Maclaurin and binomial expansions then, the joint mean waiting time function Mw (t1 , t2 ) is
if t1 > t2 > 0
Mw1 (t1 , t2 )
if 0 < t1 < t2
Mw2 (t1 , t2 )
Mw (t1 , t2 ) =
(25)
if t1 = t2 = t,
Mw3 (t, t)
where
Mwi (t1 , t2 ) =
(k) (k)
∞
X
gj ψ j
1
θ3−i + θ3
θi
k+1
(t1 t2 )
; i = 1, 2,
2
F (t1 , t2 )
j
j
((k + 1)!)
j,k=0
Mw3 (t, t) =
(k)
∞
X
(−1)j Qj
θ1 + θ2 + θ3 k+1
1
t
,
j
F (t, t)
(k + 1)!
j,k=0
and
(k)
gj
=
dk −jη α (x1 )
dk −jη α (x2 )
(k)
=
(e
)|
,
ψ
(e
)|x2 =0 ,
x
=0
1
j
dxk1
dxk2
(k)
Qj
=
dk −jη α (x)
(e
)|x=0 .
dxk
Also, the marginal mean waiting time functions mwi (t) for X1 and X2 can be written as:
Z t
1
FXi (xi ) dxi
mwi (t) =
FXi (t) 0
(k)
∞
X
(−1)j g∗j θi + θ3 k+1
1
t
; i = 1, 2,
(26)
=
j
FXi (t)
(k + 1)!
j,k=0
7
where
(k)
g∗j =
4.5
dk −jη α (xi )
(e
)|xi =0 .
dxki
The hazard rate, the availability and the mean residual lifetime
functions for a parallel system
Cox (1972) defined the joint hazard rate function as a vector, which is useful to calculate
the total life span of a two component parallel system (2 − out − of − 2 : F ) as follows
h(x∗ ) = (hX (x), h12 (x1 |x2 ), h21 (x2 |x1 )) ,
(27)
where the first element h(x) in the vector h(x∗ ), gives the hazard function of the system using
the information that both the component has survived beyond x, where X = min(X1 , X2 ).
The second element h12 (x1 |x2 ), gives the hazard function span of the first component given
that it has survived to an age x1 , and the other has failed at x2 . Similar argument holds
for the third element h21 (x2 |x1 ).
If (X1 , X2 ) is a BEGLE random vector, then the joint hazard rate function h(x∗ ) is
α
hX (x) =
and
α(θ 1 + θ 2 + θ 3 )(a + bx)η α−1 (x)e−η (x) 1 − e−η
θ1 +θ2 +θ3 −1
1 − e−ηα (x)
−1
θ3
α
fX1 (x1 ) 1 − e−η (x1 )
h12 (x1 |x2 ) =
θ1
1 − 1 − e−ηα (x1 )
h21 (x2 |x1 ) =
fX2 (x2 ) 1 − e−η
α
(x2 ) θ3
1 − 1 − e−ηα (x2 )
θ2
.
α
(x) −1
,
(28)
(29)
(30)
Also, the joint availability function can be defined as a vector, which is useful to calculate
the expected lifetime of a parallel system with two component as follows
V (x∗ ) = (vX (x), v12 (x1 |x2 ), v21 (x2 |x1 )) ,
(31)
where the first element v(x) in the vector V (x∗ ), gives the expected lifetime of the system using the information that both the component has survived beyond x, where X =
min(X1 , X2 ). The second element v12 (x1 |x2 ), gives the expected lifetime span of the first
component given that it has survived to an age x1 , and the other has failed at x2 . Similar
argument holds for the third element v21 (x2 |x1 ).
If (X1 , X2 ) is a BEGLE random vector, then the joint availability functionV (x∗ ) is
1
V (x) =
A
Z∞
yfX (y) dy; A =
x
Z∞
fX (y) dy ,
(32)
x
using Maclaurin expansion, binomial expansion and upper incomplete gamma function, we
get
∞ α−1
∞
X
XX
1
(k)
(33)
ϑi,j (aΓ(α∗ , x) + b(Γ(α∗ + 1, x)).
V (x) =
θ +θ +θ
1 − (Ψ(x)) 1 2 3 i=0 j=0 k=0
8
Similarly,
V12 (x1 |x2 ) =
1
B
Z∞
yf (y, x2 ) dy; B =
f (y, x2 ) dy, x1 > x2 ,
x1
x1
=
Z∞
1
θ1
1 − (Ψ(x1 ))
α−1
X
∞
X
(k)
ξ i,j (aΓ(α∗ , x1 ) + b(Γ(α∗ + 1, x1 )),
(34)
j=0 i,k=0
and
V21 (x2 |x1 ) =
1
C
Z∞
yf (x1 , y) dy; C =
x2
=
Z∞
f (x1 , y) dy, x1 < x2 ,
x2
1
θ2
1 − (Ψ(x2 ))
α−1
X
∞
X
(k)
Ωi,j (aΓ(α∗ , x2 ) + b(Γ(α∗ + 1, x2 )),
(35)
j=0 i,k=0
where
(k)
=
(k)
=
Ωi,j
(k)
=
α∗
=
ϑi,j
ξ i,j
(k) j
b
α − 1 θ1 + θ2 + θ3 − 1
(−1)i aα−j−1 Q∗i
,
k!
2
j
i
(k) j
b
α − 1 θ1 − 1
(−1)i aα−j−1 Q∗i
,
αθ 1
k!
2
j
i
(k) j
(−1)i aα−j−1 Q∗i
b
α − 1 θ2 − 1
αθ 2
,
k!
2
j
i
α + j + k + 1,
α (θ1 + θ2 + θ3 )
and
dk
(exp(−(1 + i)η α (y) + y))|y=0 .
dy k
On the other hand, Asha and Jagathnath (2008) defined the joint mean residual lifetime
m(x∗ ), which is useful to compute the mean residual lifetime (MRL) to two component in
a parallel system, as follows
(k)
Q∗i =
m(x∗ ) = (mX (x), m12 (x1 |x2 ), m21 (x2 |x1 )) ,
(36)
∗
where the first element m(x) in the vector m(x ), gives the MRL of the system using the
information that both the component has survived beyond x ,where X = min(X1 , X2 ). The
second element m12 (x1 |x2 ), gives the MRL span of the first component given that it has
survived to an age x1 , and the other has failed at x2 . Similar argument holds for the third
element m21 (x2 |x1 ). The joint MRL function related to the joint vitality function by the
relationships
mX (x)
m12 (x1 |x2 )
= vX (x) − x , x > 0.
= v12 (x1 |x2 ) − x1 , x1 > x2 .
(37)
(38)
m21 (x2 |x1 )
= v21 (x2 |x1 ) − x2 , x1 < x2 .
(39)
So, If (X1 , X2 ) is a BEGLE random vector, then it is easy to get the vector m(x∗ ).
9
5
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)
In this section, we want to estimate the unknown parameters of the BEGLED. We will
use the maximum likelihood method. Suppose that (x11 , x21 ), (x12 , x22 ),..., (x1n , x2n ) is
a sample of size n, from the BEGLED. We use the following notation I1 = {x1i < x2i },
I2 = {x1i > x2i }, I3 = {x1i = x2i = xi }, I = I1 ∪ I2 ∪ I3 , |I1 | = n1 , |I2 | = n2 , |I3 | = n3 ,
and |I| = n1 + n2 + n3 = n. Based on the observations, the likelihood function l(Φ) of this
sample is
l(Φ) =
n1
Y
f1 (x1i , x2i )
n2
Y
f2 (x1i , x2i )
f3 (xi , xi ).
(40)
i=1
i=1
i=1
n3
Y
Substituting from Equation (3) into Equation (40), the log-likelihood function L(Φ) can be
written as
L(Φ) =
n1
n1
X
X
ln(η(x1i ))
ln(a + bx1i ) + (α − 1)
n1 ln α2 θ 2 (θ1 + θ3 ) +
i=1
i=1
+ (θ1 + θ 3 − 1)
n1
X
i=1
+(α − 1)
n1
X
n1
n1
X
X
α
ln(a + bx2i )
η α (x1i ) +
ln 1 − e−η (x1i ) −
ln(η(x2i )) + (θ 2 − 1) ln 1 − e−η
i=1
+n2 ln(α2 θ 1 (θ 2 + θ 3 )) +
n2
X
α
(x2i )
ln(a + bx1i ) + (α − 1)
n2
X
i=1
+(α − 1)
n2
X
−
−
η α (x2i )
i=1
n2
X
ln(η(x1i ))
n2
n2
X
X
α
ln(a + bx2i )
η α (x1i ) +
ln 1 − e−η (x1i ) −
ln(η(x2i )) + (θ 2 + θ 3 − 1)
n2
X
i=1
α
η (x2i ) + n3 ln αθ3 +
n3
X
α
ln 1 − e−η (x2i )
ln(a + bxi ) + (α − 1)
n3
X
i=1
n3
X
ln(η(xi ))
i=1
i=1
i=1
+ (θ1 + θ 2 + θ 3 − 1)
i=1
i=1
i=1
n2
X
i=1
i=1
+(θ1 − 1)
i=1
n1
X
i=1
n3
X
α
η α (xi ).
ln 1 − e−η (xi ) −
i=1
The first partial derivatives of Equation (41) with respect to α, a, b, θ1 , θ2 and θ 3 are
10
(41)
∂L
∂α
n1
n1
X
η α (x1i ) ln(η(x1i ))
2n1 X
ln(η(x1i )) + (θ 1 + θ3 − 1)
+
α
eηα (x1i ) − 1
i=1
i=1
=
−
n1
X
η α (x1i ) ln(η(x1i )) +
+(θ 2 − 1)
+(θ 1 − 1)
n2
X
η α (x1i ) ln(η(x1i ))
i=1
−
i=1
n2
X
e
1i )
∂L
∂a
=
n1
X
i=1
−α
η (x2i ) ln(η(x2i )) +
n3
X
n2
X
η α (x1i ) ln(η(x1i ))
i=1
n2
X
η α (x2i ) ln(η(x2i ))
eηα (x2i ) − 1
ln(η(xi )) −
n3
X
η α (xi ) ln(η(xi ))
i=1
i=1
n3
X
η α (xi ) ln(η(xi ))
n3
+ (θ 1 + θ2 + θ3 − 1)
α
i=1
eηα (xi ) − 1
(42)
,
n1
n1
X
X
x1i
1
αx1i η α−1 (x1i )
+ (α − 1)
+ (θ 1 + θ 3 − 1)
a + bx1i
η(x1i )
eηα (x1i ) − 1
i=1
i=1
n1
X
x1i η α−1 (x1i ) +
+(θ2 − 1)
+(α − 1)
n1
X
1
x2i
+ (α − 1)
a + bx2i
η(x
2i )
i=1
n1
X
αx2i η α−1 (x2i )
i=1
n2
X
i=1
n2
X
n1
X
i=1
i=1
+
n2
X
i=1
i=1
+
−
−1
ln(η(x1i )) + (θ2 + θ3 − 1)
α
η α (x2i ) ln(η(x2i ))
2n2
ln(η(x1i ))
+
α
i=1
+
eηα (x2i ) − 1
η α (x
n1
X
i=1
n1
X
η α (x2i ) ln(η(x2i ))
i=1
+
ln(η(x2i )) −
i=1
i=1
n2
X
n1
X
eηα (x2i )
−1
−α
n1
X
x2i η α−1 (x2i ) +
i=1
n2
X
n2
X
i=1
1
a + bx1i
n2
X
αx1i η α−1 (x1i )
x1i
x1i η α−1 (x1i ) + (θ 1 − 1)
−α
η(x1i )
eηα (x1i ) − 1
i=1
i=1
n2
n2
X
X
1
x2i
αx2i η α−1 (x2i )
+ (α − 1)
+ (θ2 + θ3 − 1)
a + bx2i
η(x2i )
eηα (x2i ) − 1
i=1
i=1
i=1
n2
X
−α
i=1
x2i η α−1 (x2i ) +
n3
X
i=1
n3
X
1
αxi η α−1 (xi )
+ (θ1 + θ2 + θ3 − 1)
a + bxi
eηα (xi ) − 1
i=1
n3
n3
X
X
xi
xi η α−1 (xi ),
+(α − 1)
−α
η(x
)
i
i=1
i=1
11
(43)
∂L
∂b
=
n1
X
n
i=1
n1
X
+
i=1
+
n
1
1
x1i
(x1i )2
α(x1i )2 η α−1 (x1i )
α−1X
θ1 + θ3 − 1 X
+
+
a + bx1i
2 i=1 η(x1i )
2
eηα (x1i ) − 1
i=1
n1
n1
x2i
α(x2i )2 η α−1 (x2i )
αX
θ2 − 1 X
−
(x1i )2 η α−1 (x1i ) +
a + bx2i
2 i=1
2 i=1
eηα (x2i ) − 1
n
n
n
2
1
1
X
x1i
α−1 X
(x2i )2
αX
(x2i )2 η α−1 (x2i ) +
−
2 i=1 η(x2i )
2 i=1
a
+
bx1i
i=1
n
n
2
2
α−1 X
(x1i )2
α(x1i )2 η α−1 (x1i )
θ1 − 1 X
+
+
2 i=1 η(x1i )
2 i=1
eηα (x1i ) − 1
−
+
+
n2
n2
n2
X
x2i
αX
(x2i )2
α−1 X
(x1i )2 η α−1 (x1i ) +
+
2 i=1
a + bx2i
2 i=1 η(x2i )
i=1
n2
n2
θ2 + θ 3 − 1 X
α(x2i )2 η α−1 (x2i ) α X
−
(x2i )2 η α−1 (x2i )
ηα (x2i ) − 1
2
2
e
i=1
i=1
n3
X
i=1
n
n
n
3
3
(xi )2
α(xi )2 η α−1 (xi )
α−1 X
θ1 + θ2 + θ3 − 1 X
xi
+
+
a + bxi
2 i=1 η(xi )
2
eηα (xi ) − 1
i=1
3
αX
−
(xi )2 η α−1 (xi ),
2 i=1
∂L
∂θ1
n
=
n
1
2
n
X
X
α
α
n1
2
ln 1 − e−η (x1i ) +
ln 1 − e−η (x1i )
+
+
θ1 + θ3 i=1
θ1
i=1
+
n3
X
i=1
∂L
∂θ2
(44)
α
ln 1 − e−η (xi ) ,
(45)
n
=
n
1
2
X
α
α
n2
n1 X
ln 1 − e−η (x2i ) +
ln 1 − e−η (x2i )
+
+
θ2
θ2 + θ3 i=1
i=1
+
n3
X
i=1
α
ln 1 − e−η (xi ) ,
(46)
and
∂L
∂θ3
n
n
=
2
1
n
X
X
α
α
n1
3
ln 1 − e−η (x2i ) +
ln 1 − e−η (x1i ) +
+
θ1 + θ3 i=1
θ
3
i=1
n
3
X
α
n2
+
ln 1 − e−η (xi ) .
+
θ 2 + θ 3 i=1
(47)
By Equating the Equations (42-47) by zeros, we get the non-linear normal Equations. So,
the solution has to be obtained numerically.
12
6
Data Analysis
In this section, we have analyzed one bivariate real data set to explicate that the BEGLED
can be a good lifetime model, comparing with Marshall-Olkin bivariate exponential distribution (MOBED), bivariate generalized exponential distribution (BVGED) and bivariate
generalized linear failure rate distribution (BGLFRD). To make this comparison, we will
use the log-likelihood values (L), Akaike information criterion (AIC), correct Akaike information criterion (CAIC), Hannan-Quinn information criterion (HQIC) and the likelihood
ratio test (Λ).
The data set in Table 1 has been obtained from Meintanis (2007). This data represents
football (soccer) data of the UEFA Champion’s League data for the year 2004 : 2005 and
2005 : 2006. This data describes the games which satisfy the following two conditions:
1. At least one kick goal scored by any team have been considered.
2. The home team must be scored at least one goal.
Note that, the kick goal is the goal which scored directly from foul kick, penalty kick or
any other direct free kick. Here the variables X1 and X2 are as follows:
X1 : represents the time in minutes of the first kick goal scored by any team.
X2 : represents the first goal of any type scored by the home team.
Table 1. The UEFA Champion’s League data for the year 2004 : 2005 and
2005 : 2006
X1
X2
2004 : 2005
Lyon : Real Madrid
26
20
Internazionale : Bremen
Milan : Fenerbahce
63
18
Real Madrid : Roma
Chelsea : Anderlecht
19
19
Man. United : Fenerbahce
Club Brugge : Juventus
66
85
Bayern : Ajax
Fenerbahce : PSV
40
40
Moscow : PSG
Internazionale : Rangers
49
49
Barcelona : Shakhtar
Panathinaikos : Bremen
8
8
Leverkusen : Roma
Ajax : Arsenal
69
71
Arsenal : Panathinaikos
Man. United : Benfica
39
39
Dynamo Kyiv : Real Madrid
Real Madrid : Rosenborg
82
48
Man. United : Sparta
Villarreal : Benfica
72
72
Bayern : M. TelAviv
Juventus : Bayern
66
62
Bremen : Internazionale
Club Brugge : Rapid
25
9
Anderlecht : Valencia
Olympiacos : Lyon
41
3
Panathinaikos : PSV
Internazionale : Porto
16
75
Arsenal : Rosenborg
Schalke : PSV
18
18
Liverpool : Olympiacos
Barcelona : Bremen
22
14
M. Tel-Aviv : Juventus
Milan : Schalke
42
42
Bremen : Panathinaikos
Rapid : Juventus
36
52
2005 : 2006.
X1
X2
34
34
53
39
54
7
51
28
76
64
64
15
26
48
16
16
44
13
25
14
55
11
49
49
24
24
44
30
42
3
27
47
28
28
2
2
To analyze this data by the BEGLED, we fit at first the marginals X1 and X2 of the
BEGLED separately one by one on this data. The following Tables obtain the MLEs, L,
Anderson-Darling (A∗ ) and Cramér-Von Mises (W∗ ) values for the marginals X1 and X2
13
respectively for each model.
Table 2. The MLE(s), L, A∗ , W ∗ values for X1 .
Model
E
GE
GLFR
EGLE
∧
a
0.0245
0.0449
0.0052
0.0022
∧
∧
b
0.0009
0.0006
θ
3.119
1.302
0.492
∧
α
1.897
-L
174.30
165.82
162.68
161.89
A∗
0.5202
0.6171
0.2637
0.2530
W∗
0.0686
0.0826
0.0399
0.0396
Table 3. The MLE(s), L, A∗ , W ∗ values for X2 .
Model
E
GE
GLFR
EGLE
∧
a
0.0304
0.0413
0.0192
0.0172
∧
∧
b
θ
α
–
–
–
–
6 × 10−4
2 × 10−4
1.678
1.14
0.622
∧
–
–
1.705
-L
166.219
163.937
162.938
162.672
A∗
0.3651
0.3859
0.2713
0.2640
W∗
0.0549
0.0576
0.04478
0.0436
We can conclude that, the EGLE distribution fits the data better than E, GE and GLFR
distributions for the marginals, because it has the smallest value among -L, A∗ and W∗ .
Since, the E, GE and GLFR distributions are special cases from the EGLE distribution,
we perform the following three testing of hypotheses for X1 and X2 separately:
Test 1: H01 : α = 1, b = 0, θ = 1 (ED) against H11 : α 6= 1, b > 0, θ 6= 1 (EGLED).
Test 2: H02 : α = 1, b = 0 (GED) against H12 : α 6= 1, b > 0 (EGLED).
Test 3: H03 : α = 1 (GLFRD) against H13 : α 6= 1 (EGLED).
The likelihood ratio test statistics (Λ), the degree of freedom (d.f) and the corresponding
p-values for the three tests of hypotheses in case of X1 and X2 are presented in Tables 4
and 5 respectively.
Table 4. The likelihood ratio test statistics, d.f and p-values for X1 .
Model
H◦
Λ
d.f.
p-values
E
α = 1, b = 0, θ = 1
24.824
3
0.00001681
GE
α = 1, b = 0
7.846
2
0.01978166
GLFR
α=1
1.576
1
0.20933780
Table 5. The likelihood ratio test statistics, d.f and p-values for X2 .
Model
H◦
Λ
d.f.
p-values
E
α = 1, b = 0, θ = 1
7.094
3
0.06896126
GE
α = 1, b = 0
2.53
2
0.2822393
GLFR
α=1
0.532
1
0.46576723
When the level of significance δ equals 0.05, it is clear that:
14
(a) The EGLED provides a significantly better fit in case of X1 and X2 compared to the
ED.
(b) The EGLED provides a significantly better fit in case of X1 compared to the GED.
(c) The EGLED provides a better fit for X2 compared to the GED.
(d) The EGLED provides a better fit in case of X1 and X2 compared to the GLFRD.
On the other hand, after studying the marginals X1 and X2 , we fit the BEGLED on the
UEFA Champion’s League data. The following tables obtain the MLEs, L, AIC, CAIC and
HQIC values.
Table 6. The MLEs and L values
Model
MOBE
BVGE
BGLFR
BEGLE
∧
∧
∧
∧
∧
∧
a
b
–
–
–
0.039
0.0002
0.0107
0.0008
2.711
θ1
0.012
1.351
0.492
0.00017
θ2
0.014
0.465
0.411
0.249
θ3
0.022
1.153
0.411
0.220
α
–
–
0.089
–
-L
339.0
296.9
293.4
291.7
Table 7. The AIC, CAIC and HQIC values.
Model
MOBE
BVGE
BGLFR
BEGLE
AIC
684.0
601.9
596.8
595.4
CAIC
684.7
603.1
598.7
598.2
HQIC
685.8
604.1
599.6
598.8
It is clear that, the BEGLED provides a better fit than MOBE, BVGE and BGLFR distributions because it has the smallest value among -L, AIC, CAIC and HQIC. Since, the
BVGE and BGLFR distributions are special cases from the BEGLED, then we perform the
following two testing of hypotheses:
Test 1: H02 : α = 1, b = 0 (BVGED) against H12 : α 6= 1, b > 0 (BEGLED).
Test 2: H03 : α = 1 (BVGLFRD) against H13 : α 6= 1 (BEGLED).
The likelihood ratio test statistics, d.f and p-values for the BVGE and the BGLFR
distributions are given in the following Table.
Table 8. The likelihood ratio test statistics, d.f and p-values.
Model
H◦
Λ
d.f.
p-values
BVGE
α= 1, b = 0
10.466
2
0.00533749
BGLFR
α= 1
3.354
1
0.06704192
We note that the p-value is not large. So, we prefer the BEGLED for analyzing this data.
15
7
Simulation Study
In this section, the MLE method is used to estimate the parameters α, a, b, θ1 , θ2 and
θ3 of the BEGLED. The population parameters are generated using software ”Mathcad
prime 3” package. The sampling distributions are obtained for different sample sizes n =
[30, 50, 100, 200] from N = 1000 replications. This study presents an assessment of the properties of the MLE for the parameters in terms of bias, variance (Var), mean square error
(MSE) and 95% confidence intervals (C.I), which be obtained in the following Tables.
Table 9. The MLEs, Bias, Var, MSE and C.I values
n
parameter Estimate
Bias
Var
30
α = 1.5
1.529447
0.029447
0.0422195
a = 0.5
0.505473
0.005473
0.0050818
b = 0.7
0.711647
0.011647
0.0098601
θ1 = 0.8
0.913251
0.113251
0.2811745
θ2 = 1.2
1.300607
0.100607
0.3690383
θ3 = 1.3
1.35555
0.05555
0.2409224
50
α = 1.5
1.5125455 0.0125455 0.0249091
a = 0.5
0.4996033 −0.000396 0.0031267
b = 0.7
0.7016369 0.0016369 0.0059615
θ1 = 0.8
0.901861
0.101861
0.1651336
θ2 = 1.2
1.2920736 0.0920736 0.2386965
θ3 = 1.3
1.3579218 0.0579218 0.1491417
100
α = 1.5
1.5092043 0.0092043
0.011566
a = 0.5
0.5002042 0.0002042 0.0014805
b = 0.7
0.7015377 0.0015377 0.0028327
θ1 = 0.8
0.8486051 0.0486051 0.0765937
θ2 = 1.2
1.2433257 0.0433257 0.1115477
θ3 = 1.3
1.3260033 0.0260033 0.0700138
200
α = 1.5
1.5029588 0.0029588 0.0057007
a = 0.5
0.4999514 −.0000486 0.0007961
b = 0.7
0.700456
0.000456
0.0015143
θ1 = 0.8
0.8273891 0.0273891 0.0397173
θ2 = 1.2
1.2235063 0.0235063 0.0584567
θ3 = 1.3
1.3136215 0.0136215 0.0367075
16
MSE
0.0430866
0.0051117
0.0099958
0.2940002
0.37916
0.2440082
0.0250665
0.0031268
0.0059642
0.1755093
0.247174
0.1524966
0.0116508
0.0014805
0.0028351
0.0789561
0.1134248
0.0706899
0.0057094
0.0007961
0.0015145
0.0404674
0.0590093
0.036893
C.I
(1.2060, 2.0056)
(0.3717, 0.6442)
(0.5353, 0.9118)
(0.2862, 2.2053)
(0.5189, 2.7853)
(0.6489, 2.4833)
(1.2673, 1.8829)
(0.3929, 0.6071)
(0.5624, 0.8559)
(0.3843, 1.9003)
(0.5865, 2.4482)
(0.7602, 2.2375)
(1.3322, 1.7394)
(0.4263, 0.5754)
(0.6049, 0.8093)
(0.4596, 1.5080)
(0.7225, 1.9904)
(0.8795, 1.9229)
(1.3728, 1.6699)
(0.4468, 0.5564)
(0.6319, 0.7807)
(0.5076, 1.2493)
(0.8101, 1.7279)
(0.9755, 1.7035)
Table 10. The MLEs, Bias, Var, MSE and
n
parameter Estimate
Bias
30
α=2
1.8540053 −0.1459947
a = 0.2
0.2043051
0.0043051
b = 1.5
1.5124662
0.0124662
θ1 = 0.5
0.5857591
0.0857591
θ2 = 0.6
0.6827111
0.0827111
θ3 = 0.9
0.9424471
0.0424471
50
α=2
1.8900924 −0.1099076
a = 0.2
0.2016888
0.0016888
b = 1.5
1.5054807
0.0054807
θ1 = 0.5
0.5604422
0.0604422
θ2 = 0.6
0.657993
0.057993
θ3 = 0.9
0.9271563
0.0271563
100
α=2
1.9448174 −0.0551826
a = 0.2
0.2006911
0.0006911
b = 1.5
1.5025237
0.0025237
θ1 = 0.5
0.5351945
0.0351945
θ2 = 0.6
0.6309327
0.0309327
θ3 = 0.9
0.9152326
0.0152326
200
α=2
1.977254
−0.022746
a = 0.2
0.2002004
0.0002004
b = 1.5
1.5009306
0.0009306
θ1 = 0.5
0.5172642
0.0172642
θ2 = 0.6
0.6161236
0.0161236
θ3 = 0.9
0.9085774
0.0085774
C.I values
Var
0.0861492
0.0047227
0.0168988
0.092056
0.108878
0.0855705
0.054245
0.0029133
0.0103271
0.0556656
0.0633326
0.0536466
0.0271835
0.0014431
0.0050839
0.0261092
0.0311299
0.0263485
0.0112714
0.0006825
0.0023884
0.0120296
0.014622
0.0124857
MSE
0.1074636
0.0047412
0.0170542
0.0994106
0.1157192
0.0873723
0.0663247
0.0029162
0.0103572
0.0593188
0.0666958
0.054384
0.0302286
0.0014436
0.0050903
0.0273479
0.0320867
0.0265805
0.0117888
0.0006825
0.0023893
0.0123276
0.014882
0.0125593
C.I
(1.3579, 2.5402)
(0.0793, 0.3422)
(1.2850, 1.7882)
(0.2091, 1.3758)
(0.2713, 1.4742)
(0.4933, 1.6119)
(1.4403, 2.4056)
(0.0983, 0.3127)
(1.3217, 1.7219)
(0.2489, 1.1597)
(0.3180, 1.3028)
(0.5486, 1.4589)
(1.6074, 2.2876)
(0.1273, 0.2765)
(1.3686, 1.6470)
(0.2977, 0.9242)
(0.3745, 1.0547)
(0.6396, 1.2798)
(1.7652, 2.1946)
(0.1481, 0.2525)
(1.4047, 1.6006)
(0.3456, 0.7748)
(0.4252, 0.9035)
(0.7099, 1.1482)
From Tables 9 and 10, we note that the bias is reduced as the sample size is increased.
8
Conclusions
In this paper, we have proposed a bivariate exponentiated generalized linear exponential
distribution (BEGLED), whose marginals are exponentiated generalized linear exponential
distributions. We discussed some statistical and reliability properties of the new distribution.
Since the joint CDF and the joint PDF are in a closed form, therefore the BEGLED can be
used in practice for non-negative and positively correlated random variables. The maximum
likelihood estimates (MLE) of the six parameters index to the BEGLED are discussed.
Moreover, a real data set is analyzed to show the usefulness of the proposed distribution.
Also, the bias of the parameters is calculated using simulation studies. We hope our new
distribution (BEGLED) might attract wider sets of applications in reliability analysis.
References
[1] Al-Khedhairi, A. and El-Gohary, A., (2008). A new class of bivariate Gompertz distributions and its mixture. International journal of mathematical analysis, 2(5), 235-253.
17
[2] Asha, G. and Jagathnath, K. M., (2008). Modeling and characterizations of a bivariate
Pareto distribution. Stat and appli, 7(4), 435-452.
[3] Balakrishna, N. and Shiji, K., (2014). On a class of bivariate exponential distributions.
Statistics and probability letters, 85,153-160.
[4] Basu, A. P., (1971). Bivariate failure rate. American statistics association, 66, 103-104.
[5] Cox, D. R.,(1972). Regression models and life tables. Royal statistics society, 34, 187220.
[6] Domma, F., (2009). Some properties of the bivariate Burr type III distribution. Statistics. DOI: 10.1080/02331880902986547.
[7] El-Bassiouny, A. H., EL-Damcese, M., Abdelfattah, M. and Eliwa, M. S., (2016). Bivariate exponentaited generalized Weibull-Gompertz distribution. Journal of applied
probability and statistics, 11(1), 25-46.
[8] El-Gohary, A., El-Bassiouny, A. H. and El-Morshedy, M., (2016). Bivariate exponentiated modified Weibull extension distribution. J. stat. appl. pro, 5(1), 67-78.
[9] Kundu, D. and Gupta, R. D., (2009). Bivariate generalized exponential distribution.
Journal of multivariate analysis,100, 581-593.
[10] Kundu, D. and Gupta, K., (2013). Bayes estimation for the Marshall-Olkin bivariate
Weibull distribution. Journal of computational statistics and data analysis, 57(1), 271281.
[11] Marshall, A. W. and Olkin, I., (1967). A multivariate exponential model. Journal of
the American statistical association, 62, 30-44.
[12] Meintanis, S. G., (2007). Test of fit for Marshall-Olkin distributions with applications.
Journal of statistical planning and inference, 137, 3954-3963.
[13] Rasool, R. and Akbar, A. J., (2016). On bivariate exponentiated extended Weibull
family of distributions. Ciênciae Natura, Santa Maria, 38(2), 564-576.
[14] Sarhan, A. and Balakrishnan, N., (2007). A new class of bivariate distributions and its
mixture. Journal of multivariate analysis, 98,1508-1527.
[15] Sarhan, A. M., Hamilton, D. C., Smith, B., and Kundu, D., (2011). The bivariate generalized linear failure rate distribution and its multivariate extension. Computational
statistics and data analysis, 55(1),644-654.
[16] Sarhan, A., Abd EL-Baset, A. A., Ibtesam, A. A., (2013). Exponentiated generalized
linear exponential distribution. Applied mathematical modelling, 37, 2838-2849.
18
| 10math.ST
|
Submitted to the Annals of Statistics
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR THE SUP-NORM OF
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL MATRIX-VARIATE U-STATISTICS
AND ITS APPLICATIONS∗
arXiv:1602.00199v3 [math.ST] 30 Sep 2016
By Xiaohui Chen‡†
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign‡
This paper studies the Gaussian approximation of high-dimensional
and non-degenerate U-statistics of order two under the supremum
norm. We propose a two-step Gaussian approximation procedure that
does not impose structural assumptions on the data distribution.
Specifically, subject to mild moment conditions on the kernel, we
establish the explicit rate of convergence that decays polynomially in
sample size for a high-dimensional scaling limit, where the dimension
can be much larger than the sample size. We also supplement a practical Gaussian wild bootstrap method to approximate the quantiles
of the maxima of centered U-statistics and prove its asymptotic validity. The wild bootstrap is demonstrated on statistical applications
for high-dimensional non-Gaussian data including: (i) principled and
data-dependent tuning parameter selection for regularized estimation
of the covariance matrix and its related functionals; (ii) simultaneous inference for the covariance and rank correlation matrices. In
particular, for the thresholded covariance matrix estimator with the
bootstrap selected tuning parameter, we show that the Gaussian-like
convergence rates can be achieved for heavy-tailed data, which are
less conservative than those obtained by the Bonferroni technique
that ignores the dependency in the underlying data distribution. In
addition, we also show that even for subgaussian distributions, error
bounds of the bootstrapped thresholded covariance matrix estimator can be much tighter than those of the minimax estimator with a
universal threshold.
1. Introduction. Let X1 , · · · , Xn be a sample of independent and identically distributed (iid) random vectors in Rp with the distribution function
F . Let B be a separable Banach space equipped with the norm k · k and
h : Rp × Rp → B be a B-valued measurable and symmetric kernel function
such that h(x1 , x2 ) = h(x2 , x1 ) for all x1 , x2 ∈ Rp and Ekh(X1 , X2 )k < ∞.
Consider the U-statistics of order two
−1 X
n
(1)
U=
h(Xi , Xj ).
2
1≤i<j≤n
∗
First version: January 30, 2016. This version: October 4, 2016.
Research partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1404891 and UIUC Research Board
Award RB15004.
†
1
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
2
CHEN
The main focus of this paper is to study the asymptotic behavior of the random variable kU − EU k in the high-dimensional setup when p := p(n) → ∞.
Since the introduction of U-statistics by Hoeffding [28], their limit theorems have been extensively studied in the classical asymptotic setup where
n diverges and p is fixed [29, 26, 51, 2, 57, 24, 30, 31]. Recently, due to
the explosive data enrichment, regularized estimation and dimension reduction of high-dimensional data have attracted a lot of research attentions such as covariance matrix estimation [6, 7, 22, 14], graphical models
[20, 56, 9], discriminant analysis [38], factor models [23, 34], among many
others. Those problems all involve the consistent estimation of an expectation of U-statistics of order two E[h(X, X0 )], where X and X0 are two
independent random vectors in Rp with the distribution F . Below are two
examples.
P
Example 1.1. The sample covariance
matrix Ŝ = (n − 1)−1 ni=1 (Xi −
P
X̄)(Xi − X̄)> , where X̄ = n−1 ni=1 Xi is the sample mean vector, is an
unbiased estimator of the covariance matrix Σ = Cov(X). Then Ŝ is a
matrix-valued U-statistic of form (1) with the unbounded kernel
(2)
1
h(x1 , x2 ) = (x1 − x2 )(x1 − x2 )>
2
for x1 , x2 ∈ Rp .
Example 1.2. The covariance matrix Σ quantifies the linear dependency
in X = (X1 , · · · , Xp )> . The rank correlation is another measure for the
nonlinear dependency in a random vector. For m, k = 1, · · · , p, (Xm , Xk )
0 , X 0 ) are said to be concordant if (X − X 0 )(X − X 0 ) > 0. Let
and (Xm
m
k
m
k
k
(3)
hmk (x1 , x2 ) = 2 · 1{(x1m − x2m )(x1k − x2k ) > 0}
and h(x1 , x2 ) = {hmk (x1 , x2 )}pm,k=1 . Kendall’s tau rank correlation coefficient matrix T = {τmk }pm,k=1 can be written as a U-statistic with the
bounded kernel hmk in (3)
τmk
−1
n
=
2
X
hmk (Xi , Xj ) − 1.
1≤i<j≤n
0 )(X − X 0 ) > 0),
Then, (τmk + 1)/2 is an unbiased estimator of P((Xm − Xm
k
k
0 , X 0 ) are concordant.
i.e. the probability that (Xm , Xk ) and (Xm
k
In this paper, we are interested in the following central questions: how
does the dimension impact the asymptotic behavior of U-statistics and how
can we make statistical inference when p → ∞? Motivation of this paper
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
3
comes from the estimation and inference problems for large covariance matrix and its related functionals [42, 56, 49, 46, 55, 10, 7, 14, 15]. To establish
rate of convergence for the regularized estimators or to study the `∞ -norm
Gaussian approximations in high-dimensions, a key issue is to characterize
the supremum norm of U − EU . Therefore, as the primary concern of the
current paper, we shall consider B = Rp×p and khk = max1≤m,k≤p |hmk |.
Our first main contribution is to provide a Gaussian approximation scheme
for the high-dimensional non-degenerate U-statistics under the sup-norm.
Different from the central limit theorem (CLT) type results for the maxima of sums of iid random vectors [16], which are directly approximated by
the Gaussian counterparts with the matching first and second moments, approximating the sup-norm of U-statistics is more subtle because of its dependence and nonlinearity. Here, we propose a two-step Gaussian approximation
method in Section 2. In the first step, we approximate the U-statistics by the
leading component of a linear form in the Hoeffding decomposition (a.k.a.
the Hájek projection); in the second, the linear term is further approximated by the Gaussian random vectors. To approximate the distribution of
the sup-norm of U-statistics by a linear form, a maximal moment inequality
is developed to control the nonlinear and canonical, i.e. completely degenerate, form of the reminder term. Then the linear projection is handled
by the recent development of Gaussian approximation in high-dimensions
[16, 59, 58]. Explicit rate of convergence of the Gaussian approximation for
high-dimensional U-statistics is established for unbounded kernels subject
to sub-exponential and uniform polynomial moment conditions. Specifically,
under either moment conditions, we show that the same convergence rate
that decays polynomially in sample size as in the Gaussian approximation
for the maxima of sums of iid random vectors is attained and the validity of
the Gaussian approximation is proved for a high-dimensional scaling limit,
where p can be much larger than n.
The second contribution of this paper is to propose a Gaussian wild boot√
strap procedure for approximating the quantiles of nkU − EU k. Since the
(unobserved) linear projection terms of the centered U-statistics depend on
the unknown underlying data distribution F and there is a nonlinear remainder term, we use an additional estimation step beyond the Gaussian
approximation. Here, we employ the idea of decoupling and estimate the
linear projection on an independent dataset. Validity of the Gaussian wild
bootstrap is established under the same set of assumptions in the Gaussian approximation results. One important feature of the Gaussian approximation and the bootstrap procedure is that no structural assumptions on
the distribution F are required and the strong dependence in F is allowed,
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
4
CHEN
which in fact helps the Gaussian and bootstrap approximation. In Section
4, we demonstrate the capability of the proposed bootstrap method applied
to a number of important high-dimensional problems, including the datadependent tuning parameter selection in the thresholded covariance matrix
estimator and the simultaneous inference of the covariance and Kendall’s
tau rank correlation matrices. Two additional applications for the estimation
problems of the sparse precision matrix and the sparse linear functionals are
given in the Supplemental Materials (SM). In those problems, we show that
the Gaussian like convergence rates can be achieved for non-Gaussian data
with heavy-tails. For the sparse covariance matrix estimation problem, we
also show that the thresholded estimator with the tuning parameter selected
by the bootstrap procedure can gain potentially much tighter performance
bounds over the minimax estimator with a universal threshold that ignores
the dependency in F [7, 14, 11].
To establish the Gaussian approximation result and the validity of the
bootstrap method, we have to bound the the expected sup-norm of the
second-order canonical term in the Hoeffding decomposition of the U-statistics
and establish its non-asymptotic maximal moment inequalities. An alternative simple data splitting approach by reducing the U-statistics to sums of
iid random matrices can give the exact rate for bounding the moments in
the non-degenerate case [52, 40, 32, 21]. Nonetheless, the reduction to the iid
summands in terms of data splitting does not exploit the complete degeneracy structure of the canonical term and it does not lead to the convergence
result in the Gaussian approximation for the non-degenerate U-statistics;
see Section 5.1 for details. In addition, unlike the Hoeffding decomposition
approach, the data splitting approximation is not asymptotically tight in
distribution and therefore it is less useful in making inference of the highdimensional U-statistics.
P
Notations and definitions. For a vector x, we use |x|1 =
j |xj |,
P 2 1/2
|x| := |x|2 = ( j xj ) , and |x|∞ = maxj |xj | to denote its entry-wise `1 ,
P
`2 , and `∞ norms, respectively. For a matrix M , we use |M |F = ( i,j Mij2 )1/2
and kM k2 = max|a|=1 |M a| to denote its Frobenius and spectral norms, respectively. Denote a ∨ b = max(a, b) and a ∧ b = min(a, b). We shall use
K, K0 , K1 , · · · to denote positive finite absolute constants, and C, C 0 , C0 , C1 , · · ·
and c, c0 , c0 , c1 , · · · , to denote positive finite constants whose values do not
depend on n and p and may vary at different places. We write a . b if
a ≤ Cb for some constant C > 0, and a b if a . b and b . a. For
a random variable X, we write kXkq = (E|X|q )1/q for q > 0. We use
khk = max1≤m,k≤p |hmk | and khk∞ = supx1 ,x2 ∈Rp kh(x1 , x2 )k. Throughimsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
5
out the paper, we write Xn1 = (X1 , · · · , Xn ) and let X and X0 be two
independent random vectors in Rp with the distribution F , which are independent of Xn1 . We write Eh = E[h(X, X0 )] and Eg = Eg(X), where
g(x) = E[h(x, X0 )]−Eh and x ∈ Rp . For a matrix-valued kernel h : Rp ×Rp →
Rp×p , we say that: (i) h is non-degenerate w.r.t. F if Var(gmk (X)) > 0 for
all m, k = 1, · · · , p; (ii) h is canonical or completely degenerate w.r.t. F if
E[hmk (x1 , X0 )] = E[hmk (X, x2 )] = E[hmk (X, X0 )] = 0 for all m, k = 1, · · · , p
and for all x1 , x2 ∈ Rp . Without loss of generality, we shall assume throughout the paper that p ≥ 3 and the matrix h = {hmk }pm,k=1 is symmetric, i.e.
hmk = hkm .
2. Gaussian approximation. In this section, we study the Gaussian
approximation for max1≤m,k≤p (Umk − EUmk ) in (1), or equivalently the
approximation for the sup-norm of the centered U-statistics by considering U − EU and −U + EU . If Xi ’s are non-Gaussian, a seemingly intuitive method would be generating Gaussian random vectors Yi ’s by matching the
first and second moments of Xi ; i.e. to approximate U by U 0 =
n −1 P
1≤i<j≤n h(Yi , Yj ). However, empirical evidence suggests that this
2
may not be a good approximation and theoretically it seems that the nonlinearity in U and U 0 accounts for a statistically invalid approximation. To
illustrate this point, we simulate n = 200 iid observations from the p-variate
elliptic t-distribution in (66) with mean zero and degree of freedom ν = 8
in the SM. We consider the covariance matrix kernel (2) as an example. For
p = 40, the P-P plot of the empirical cdfs of the sup-norm of the centered
covariance matrices made from Xi and Yi is shown in Figure 1 (left) over
5000 simulations.
To correct the bias, a closer inspection reveals that U is an approximately
linear statistic and its linear projection part in the Hoeffding decomposition
is the leading term. This motivates us to propose a two-step approximation
method. Let
(4)
(5)
g(x1 ) = Eh(x1 , X0 ) − Eh,
f (x1 , x2 ) = h(x1 , x2 ) − Eh(x1 , X0 ) − Eh(X, x2 ) + Eh.
Clearly, f is a B-valued symmetric and canonical U-statistic of order two
w.r.t. the distribution F . Then the Hoeffding decomposition of the kernel h
is given by
(6)
h(x1 , x2 ) = f (x1 , x2 ) + g(x1 ) + g(x2 ) + Eh,
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
6
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
Z
Y
0.6
0.8
1.0
CHEN
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
X
0.6
0.8
1.0
X
Fig 1. P-P plots of the sup-norm approximation for the centered sample covariance matrix
U − EU with the kernel (2) by U 0 − EU 0 (left) and by the leading term in the Hoeffding
decomposition of U − EU (right).
from which we have
U − EU =
2
n(n − 1)
n
X
f (Xi , Xj ) +
2X
g(Xi ).
n
i=1
1≤i<j≤n
On the right-hand side of the last expression, the second term is expected
to be the leading term (a.k.a. the Hájek projection) and the first term to be
negligible under the sup-norm. Therefore, we can reasonably expect that
√
n
n
1 X
(U − EU ) ≈ √
g(Xi ),
2
n
i=1
P
where the latter can be further approximated by n−1/2 ni=1 Zi for iid Gaussian random vectors Zi ∼ N (0, Γg ) and Γg is the positive-definite covariance
matrix of g(Xi ); c.f. [16]. Denote p0 = p(p + 1)/2. Here, we slightly abuse
notations and write g̃i = vech(g(Xi )) as the half-vectorized lower triangular
matrix of g(Xi ) by columns. Therefore Γg = Cov(g̃i ) is the p0 × p0 covariance
matrix indexed by ((j, k), (m, l)) such that j ≥ k and m ≥ l. Similarly, we
shall use Zi to denote either the p × p matrix or the p0 × 1 half-vectorized
version. For the previous elliptic t-distribution example, we plotPthe empirical cdfs of max1≤m,k≤p (Ŝmk − σmk )/2 against max1≤m,k≤p n−1 ni=1 Zi,mk .
Figure 1 (right) shows a much better approximation using the leading term
in the Hoeffding decomposition.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
7
P
P
√
Let T = n(U −EU )/2, L = n−1/2 ni=1 g(Xi ), W = n−1/2 (n−1)−1 1≤i<j≤n f (Xi , Xj ),
P
and Z = n−1/2 ni=1 Zi , where Zi are iid N (0, Γg ). Denote T̄0 = maxm,k Tmk ,
L̄0 = maxm,k Lmk , and Z̄0 = maxm,k Zmk . Let
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) = sup |P(T̄0 ≤ t) − P(Z̄0 ≤ t)|
t∈R
be the Kolmogorov distance between T̄0 and Z̄0 . Let Bn ≥ 1 be a sequence of
real numbers possibly tending to infinity. We consider two types of conditions
on the kernel moments. First, we establish the explicit convergence rate for
the kernels with sub-exponential moments; e.g. the ε-contaminated normal
distribution (65) in the SM.
Theorem 2.1 (Gaussian approximation for centered U-statistics: sub–
exponential kernel). Let U be a non-degenerate U-statistic of order two.
Assume that there exist constants C1 , C2 ∈ (0, ∞) and K ∈ (0, 1) such that
2 ≥ C and
(GA.1) Kernel moment: Egmk
1
(7)
max E(|hmk |2+` /Bn` ) ∨ E[exp(|hmk |/Bn )] ≤ 2
`=0,1,2
for all 1 ≤ m, k ≤ p;
(GA.2) Scaling limit:
Bn2 log7 (pn)
≤ C2 n−K .
n
Then there exists a constant C > 0 depending only on C1 , C2 such that
(8)
(9)
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) ≤ Cn−K/8 .
The assumptions in Theorem 2.1 have meaningful interpretations. (GA.1)
ensures the non-degeneracy of the Gaussian approximation and that the
truncation does not lose too much information due to the sub-exponential
tails. (GA.2) describes the high-dimensional scaling limit of valid Gaussian approximation range. In the high-dimensional context, the dimension
p grows with the sample size n and the distribution function F also depends on n. Therefore, Bn is allowed to increase with n. Theorem 2.1 shows
that the approximation error in the Kolmogorov distance converges to zero
even if p can be much larger than n and no structural assumptions on F
are required. In particular, Theorem 2.1 applies to kernels with the subexponential distribution such that khmk kq ≤ Cq for all q ≥ 1, in which case
Bn = O(1) and the dimension p is allowed to have a subexponential growth
rate in the sample size n, i.e. p = O(exp(n(1−K)/7 )). Condition (GA.1) also
covers bounded kernels khk∞ ≤ Bn , where Bn may increase with n.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
8
CHEN
Remark 1. Theorem 2.1 shows that the asymptotic validity of Gaussian approximation for centered non-degenerate U-statistics holds under the
high-dimensional scaling limit (GA.2), which involves only a polynomial factor of log p. However, the sup-norm convergence rate n−K/8 obtained in (9)
is slower than n−1/2 . Similar observations have been made in the existing literature on the Berry-Esseen type bounds [47, 3] for the normalized sums of
iid random vectors Xi ∈ Rp with mean zero and the identity covariance ma√
trix. [47] showed that the sample mean nX̄ has the asymptotic normality
√
if p = o( n) and [3] showed that
√
sup |P( nX̄ ∈ A) − P(Z ∈ A)| ≤ Kp1/4 E|X1 |3 /n1/2 ,
A∈A
where A is the class of all convex subsets in Rp , Z ∼ N (0, Idp ), and K > 0 is
an absolute constant. In either case, the dependence of the CLT rate on the
dimension p is polynomial (p/n1/2 and p7/4 /n1/2 , resp). [16] considered the
√
Gaussian approximation for maxj≤p nX̄j and they obtained the rate n−c
for some (unspecified) exponent c > 0. Following the proofs of Theorem 2.1
in the current paper and Theorem 2.2 and Corollary 2.1 in [16], we can show
that c is allowed to take the value K/8. Therefore, the effect of higher-order
terms than the Hájek projection to a linear subspace in the Hoeffding decomposition vanishes in the Gaussian approximation. A similar observation
is made for the uniform polynomial moment kernels; c.f. Theorem 2.2. For
multivariate symmetric statistics of order two, to the best of our knowledge,
the Gaussian approximation result (9) with the explicit convergence rate is
new. When p is fixed, the rate of convergence and the Edgeworth expansion
of such statistics can be found in [5, 25, 4]. In those papers, assuming the
Cramér condition on g(X1 ) and suitable moment conditions on h(X1 , X2 ),
the Edgeworth expansion of U-statistics was established for the univariate
case (p = 1) with remainder o(n−1/2 ) or O(n−1 ) [5, 4] and the multivariate
case (p > 1 fixed) with remainder o(n−1/2 ) [25]. In the latter work [25],
it is unclear that how the constant in the error bound depends on the dimensionality parameter p. On the contrary, our Theorem 2.1 can allow p to
be larger than n in order to obtain the CLT type results in much higher
dimensions.
Next, we consider kernels with uniform polynomial moments (up to the
fourth order); e.g. the elliptical t-distribution (66) in the SM.
Theorem 2.2 (Gaussian approximation for centered U-statistics: kernel
with uniform polynomial moment). Let U be a non-degenerate U-statistic
of order two. Assume that there exist constants C1 , C2 ∈ (0, ∞) and K ∈
(0, 1) such that
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
9
2 ≥ C and
(GA.1’) Kernel moment: Egmk
1
(10)
max E(|hmk |2+` /Bn` ) ∨ E[(khk/Bn )4 ] ≤ 1
`=0,1,2
for all 1 ≤ m, k ≤ p;
(GA.2’) Scaling limit:
Bn4 log7 (pn)
≤ C2 n−K .
n
(11)
Then there exists a constant C > 0 depending only on C1 , C2 such that (9)
holds.
Theorem 2.1 and 2.2 allow us to approximate the quantiles of T̄0 by those
of Z̄0 , with the knowledge of Γg . In practice, the covariance matrix Γg and the
Hájek projection terms g(Xi ), i = 1, · · · , n, depend on the data distribution
F , which is unknown. Thus, quantiles of Z̄0 need to be estimated in real
applications. However, we shall see in Section 3 that Theorem 2.1 and 2.2
can still be used to derive a feasible resampling based method to approximate
the quantiles of Gaussian maxima Z̄0 and therefore T̄0 .
3. Wild bootstrap. The main purpose of this section is to approximate the quantiles of T̄0 . Let X01 , · · · , X0n be an independent copy of X1 , · · · , Xn
that are observed; call this training data. Such data can always be obtained
by a half-sampling or data splitting on the original data. Therefore, we assume that the sample size of total data {X1 , · · · , Xn , X01 , · · · , X0n } is 2n.
Since g(Xi ), i = 1, · · · , n, are unknown, we construct an estimator for it.
Let ĝi := ĝi (X1 , · · · , Xn , X01 , · · · , X0n ) be an estimator of g(Xi ) using the
original and training data. Recall that g(x) = Eh(x, X0j ) − Eh(X0i , X0j ) for
any fixed x ∈ Rp , which can be viewed as the population version for the second variable X0j . Therefore, we build an empirical version as our estimator
of g(Xi ). Specifically, we consider
(12)
−1
n
1X
n
0
ĝi =
h(Xi , Xj ) −
n
2
j=1
X
h(X0j , X0l ).
1≤j<l≤n
Conditional on Xi , ĝi is an unbiased estimator of g(Xi ). It is interesting to
view ĝi as a decoupled estimator of g(Xi ). Let
n
L̂∗0
1 X
= max √
ĝi,mk ei
1≤m,k≤p
n
i=1
n
and
L̄∗0
1 X
= max √
gmk (Xi )ei ,
1≤m,k≤p
n
i=1
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
10
CHEN
where e1 , e2 , · · · are iid standard Gaussian random variables that are also
independent of X1 , · · · , Xn , X01 , · · · , X0n . Then L̂∗0 and L̄∗0 are bootstrapped
versions of L̄0 . Denote the conditional quantiles of L̂∗0 and L̄∗0 given the data
X1 , · · · , Xn , X01 , · · · , X0n as
aL̂∗ (α) = inf{t ∈ R : Pe (L̂∗0 ≤ t) ≥ α},
0
aL̄∗0 (α) = inf{t ∈ R : Pe (L̄∗0 ≤ t) ≥ α},
where Pe is the probability taken w.r.t. e1 , · · · , en . Now, we can compute
the conditional quantile aL̂∗ (α) by the Gaussian wild bootstrap method.
0
Specifically, aL̂∗ (α) can be numerically approximated by resampling on the
0
multiplier Gaussian random variables e1 , · · · , en and we wish to use aL̂∗ (α)
0
to approximate the quantiles of T̄0 .
Theorem 3.1 (Asymptotically validity of Gaussian wild bootstrap for
centered U-statistics). Let U be a non-degenerate U-statistic of order two.
(i) (Subexponential kernel) If (GA.1) and (GA.2) hold for some constants C1 , C2 ∈ (0, ∞) and K ∈ (0, 1), then there exist a constant C > 0
depending only on C1 , C2 such that for all α ∈ (0, 1)
(13)
|P(T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)) − α| ≤ Cn−K/8 .
0
(ii) (Uniform polynomial kernel) If (GA.1’) and (GA.2’) hold for some
constants C1 , C2 ∈ (0, ∞) and K ∈ (0, 1), then there exist a constant C > 0
depending only on C1 , C2 such that for all α ∈ (0, 1)
(14)
|P(T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)) − α| ≤ Cn−K/12 .
0
Remark 2. From Theorem 3.1, the convergence rate of the wild bootstrap approach for subexponential kernels is the same as the Gaussian approximation results (Theorem 2.1), while it is slower for kernels with uniform polynomial moment of the order four (Theorem 2.2). The major error
in the latter case is due to the estimation of L̄∗0 by L̂∗0 in the wild bootstrap. Under (GA.1’) and (GA.2’), the approximation error of L̂∗0 for L̄∗0
is on the order O(n−1/4 Bn (log(np))1/2 ); see Lemma C.7 in the SM. This
is different from the previous work [16], which does not need this extra
estimation P
step for g(Xi ), i = 1, · · · , n, since only sums of iid random vecn
−1/2
tors n
i=1 Xi are involved. Therefore, for sums of iid random vectors, the wild bootstrap can attain the rate n−K/8 for both subexponential
and uniform polynomial moment (of the order four) observations. However,
with better moment conditions on the U-statistic kernel, the rate n−K/8
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
11
can be attained for polynomial moment kernels. Specifically, assuming that
max`=0,1,2 E(|hmk |2+` /Bn` ) ∨ E[(khk/Bn )q ] ≤ 1 for q ≥ 8, one can show that
the convergence rate (13) is attained. In addition, [16] does not deal with the
higher-order nonlinear terms, here we have to explicitly handle the canonical
part W in the Hoeffding decomposition. The degeneracy structure plays a
key role to establish the convergence of the bootstrap method (as well as the
Gaussian approximation results in Section 2) and new proof techniques, in
particular the decoupling, are required. The established moment bounds in
Section 5.1 are especially suitable for controlling the completely degenerate
errors of quadratic forms.
To assess the quality of the Gaussian wild bootstrap, we show two examples for the covariance matrix kernel on the ε-contaminated normal distribution (65) with the sub-exponential moment and on the elliptic t-distribution
(66) with the uniform polynomial moment. In each simulation, we generate
200 bootstrap samples for L̂∗0 . Then, we estimate P(T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)) for the
0
whole range of probabilities α ∈ [0.01, 0.99]. Figure 2 shows the empirical
approximation result. Here, we choose V = 0.9×1p 1>
p +0.1×Idp in (65) and
(66), where 1p is the p×1 vector of all ones. From Figure 2, the bootstrap approximation seems to be better in the sub-exponential moment case than in
the polynomial moment case; see (GA.1)+(GA.2) versus (GA.1’)+(GA.2’).
More simulation examples can be found in the SM.
4. Statistical applications. In this section, we present two statistical applications for the theoretical results established in Section 2–3. Two
additional examples can be found in the SM. Here, for
P notational convenience, we rescale L̂∗0 and let L̂∗0 = 2n−1 max1≤m,k≤p | ni=1 ĝi,mk ei |. Recall
that Γg = Cov(g̃i ), where gi = vech(g(Xi )).
4.1. Tuning parameter selection for the thresholded covariance matrix estimator. Consider the problem of sparse covariance matrix estimation. Let
r ∈ [0, 1) and
p
n
o
X
G(r, C0 , ζp ) = Σ ∈ Rp×p : σmm ≤ C0 ,
|σmk |r ≤ ζp for all m = 1, · · · , p
k=1
be the class of sparse covariance matrices in terms of the strong `r -ball.
Here, C0 > 0 is a constant and ζp > 0 may grow with p. Let τ ≥ 0 and
Σ̂(τ ) = {ŝmk 1{|ŝmk | > τ }}pm,k=1
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
12
CHEN
Wild bootstrap
0.8
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
Bootstrap approximation
0.6
0.4
0.2
Bootstrap approximation
0.8
1.0
1.0
Wild bootstrap
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
alpha
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
alpha
Fig 2. Plots of the estimated probabilities P(T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)) by the Gaussian wild bootstrap
0
for the range of α ∈ [0.01, 0.99]. Left is the ε-contaminated normal distribution (model:
(M1)+(D1) in the SM) and right is the elliptical t-distribution (model: (M2)+(D1)). Sample size n = 200 and dimension p = 40.
be the thresholded sample covariance matrix estimator of Σ. The class
G(r, C0 , ζp ) was introduced in [7] and the high-dimensional properties of
Σ̂(τ ) were analyzed in [7] for iid sub-Gaussian data and in [14, 15] for
heavy-tailed time series with algebraic tails. In both scenarios, the rates
of convergence were obtained with the Bonferroni (i.e. union bound) technique and one-dimensional concentration inequalities. Those performance
bounds of the thresholded estimator Σ̂(τ ) critically depend on the tuning
parameter τ . The ideal choice of the threshold for establishing the rate of
convergence under the spectral and Frobenius norms is τ = kŜ − Σk, whose
distribution depends on the unknown underlying data distribution F . In
the problem of the high-dimensional sparse covariance matrix estimation,
data-dependent tuning parameter selection is often empirically done with
the cross-validation (CV) and its theoretical properties largely remain unknown. High probability bounds of τ are given in [7, 14]. Here, we provide
a principled and data-dependent way to determine the threshold τ .
Definition 4.1 (Subgaussian random variable). A random variable X
is said to be subgaussian with mean zero and variance factor ν 2 , if
√
(15)
E[exp(X 2 /ν 2 )] ≤ 2.
Denote X ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ). In particular, if X ∼ N (0, σ 2 ), then X ∼
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
13
subgaussian(4σ 2 ).
√
The upper bound 2 in (15) is not essential and it is chosen for conveniently comparing with kXkψ2 , which is the Orlicz norm of X for ψ2 (x) =
exp(x2 ) − 1 and x ≥ 0. In general, the variance factor for a subgaussian
random variable is not equivalent to the variance. For a sequence of random
variables Xn , n = 1, 2, · · · , if Xn ∼ subgaussian(ν√2 ) and σ 2 = Var(Xn ),
then by Markov’s inequality, we always have σ 2 ≤ 2ν 2 , while ν 2 may depend on n and it may diverge at faster rate than σ 2 such as σ 2 ≤ C0 and
ν 2 → ∞ as n → ∞. As a simple example, let an > 0 be a sequence of real
numbers such that an → ∞ and consider random variables X1 , · · · , Xn such
that P(Xn = ±an ) = (2a2n )−1 and P(Xn = 0) = 1 − (2a2n )−1 . Obviously,
EXn = 0 and Var(Xn ) = 1. Let ν 2 = Ca2n for
√ some constant C > 0. Then
C −1 ≤
e
E[exp(Xn2 /ν 2 )] = [1 − (2a2n )−1 ] + a−2
2 for all large enough n; i.e.
n
2
Xn ∼ subgaussian(Can ). In fact, if X ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ), then ν 2 ≥ kXkψ2 .
Therefore, we are mainly interested in the general case when ν 2 := νn2 → ∞
as n → ∞ in the statistical applications.
Theorem 4.1 (Adaptive threshold selection by wild bootstrap: subgaussian observations). Let ν ≥ 1 and Xi be iid mean zero random vectors such
that Xik ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ) for all k = 1, · · · , p and Σ ∈ G(r, C0 , ζp ). Suppose
that there exist constants Ci > 0, i = 1, · · · , 4, such that {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 ,
kX1k k4 ≤ C2 , kX1k k6 ≤ C3 ν 1/3 and kX1k k8 ≤ C4 ν 1/2 for all j, k = 1, · · · , p.
Let β ∈ (0, 1) and τ∗ = β −1 aL̂∗ (1 − α), where the bootstrap samples are
0
generated with the covariance matrix kernel in (2). If ν 4 log7 (np) ≤ C5 n1−K
for some K ∈ (0, 1), then we have
r
3 + 2β
β
kΣ̂(τ∗ ) − Σk2 ≤
(16)
+
ζp aL̂∗ (1 − α)1−r ,
0
β 1−r
1−β
r
2
4 + 3β
β
(17) p−1 |Σ̂(τ∗ ) − Σ|2F ≤ 2
+2
ζp aL̂∗ (1 − α)2−r ,
2−r
0
β
1−β
with probability at least 1 − α − Cn−K/8 for some constant C > 0 depending
only on C1 , · · · , C5 . In addition, we have E[aL̂∗ (1 − α)] ≤ C 0 (log(p)/n)1/2
0
and
(18)
E[τ∗ ] ≤ C 0 β −1 (log(p)/n)1/2 ,
where C 0 > 0 is a constant depending only on α and C1 , · · · , C5 .
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
14
CHEN
Remark 3 (Comments on the conditions in Theorem 4.1). The nondegeneracy condition {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 is quite mild in Theorem 4.1. Consider the multivariate cumulants of the joint distribution of the random
vector X = (X1 , · · · , Xp )> following a distribution F in Rp . Let χ(t) =
E[exp(ιt> X)] be the characteristic function of X, where t = (t1 , · · · , tp )> ∈
√
Rp and ι = −1. Then, the multivariate cumulants κ12···p
r1 r2 ···rp of the joint
distribution of X are the coefficients in the expansion
log χ(t) =
∞
X
r1 ,r2 ,··· ,rp =0
κ12···p
r1 r2 ···rp
(ιt1 )r1 (ιt2 )r2 · · · (ιtp )rp
.
r1 !r2 ! · · · rp !
For the covariance matrix kernel (2), we have
(19)
{Γg }(j,k),(m,l) = (κjkml
1111 + σjm σkl + σjl σkm )/4,
jkjk
where κjkml
1111 is the fourth-order cumulants of F . Therefore, if κ1111 ≥ C for
some (large) constant C > 0 depending only on C0 and C1 , then {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥
C1 for Σ ∈ G(r, C0 , ζp ).
For data following distributions in the elliptic family [43, Chapter 1], the
condition {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 is equivalent to min1≤j≤p σjj ≥ C for some
constant C > 0 depending only on C1 . To see this, for F in the elliptic
family [43, Chapter 1], it is known that
κjkml
1111 = κ(σjk σml + σjm σkl + σjl σkm ),
where the kurtosis parameter κ = [1 + ε(ν 4 − 1)]/[1 + ε(ν 2 − 1)]2 − 1 for the
ε-contaminated normal distribution in (65) and κ = 2/(ν − 4) for the elliptic
t-distribution in (66). For the elliptic t-distribution with ν = 8 (as consid2 )/8. Therefore,
ered in Figure 1), we have {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) = (3σjj σkk + 4σjk
{Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 if and only if there exists a constant C > 0 such that
σjj ≥ C for all j = 1, · · · , p. Similar comments apply to the ε-contaminated
normal distribution.
The assumption σkk ≤ C0 in Theorem 4.1 is redundant and it is automatically fulfilled under a slightly stronger condition kX1k k4 ≤ C2 . Conditions on
the growth rate on kX1k k` , ` = 4, 6, 8, are also not restrictive. Consider the
special case for the multivariate Gaussian distribution Xi ∼ N (0, Σ) such
that σkk ≤ C0 . Then X1k are subgaussian(4C0 ) and max`=4,6,8 kX1k k` ≤ C
for some constant C > 0 depending only on C0 . Therefore, if the data follow the Gaussian distribution, then the bootstrapped thresholded covariance
matrix estimator Σ̂(τ∗ ) attains (16) and (17) when p = O(exp(n(1−K)/7 )).
However, we shall emphasize that, for Σ ∈ G(r, C0 , ζp ), although the diagonal entries in Σ are uniformly bounded by a constant C0 , we do allow ν 2
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
15
to grow with n in the subgaussian distribution, in which case the bootstrap
approach can have advantages over the non-adaptive minimax thresholding
procedure (see the paragraphs below for more detailed discussions).
There are a number of interesting features ofPTheorem 4.1. Consider r =
0; i.e. Σ is truly sparse such that max1≤m≤p pk=1 1{σmk 6= 0} ≤ ζp for
Σ ∈ G(0, C0 , ζp ). Then we can take β = 1 and the convergence rates are
kΣ̂(τ∗ ) − Σk2 ≤ 6ζp aL̂∗ (1 − α)
and
0
p−1 |Σ̂(τ∗ ) − Σ|2F ≤ 18ζp aL̂∗ (1 − α)2 .
0
Hence, the tuning parameter can be adaptively selected by bootstrap samples while the rate of convergence is nearly optimal in the following sense.
Since the distribution of τ∗ mimics that of τ , Σ̂(τ∗ ) achieves the same convergence rate as the thresholded estimator Σ̂(τ ) for the oracle choice of the
threshold τ with probability at least 1 − α − Cn−K/8 . On the other hand,
the bootstrap method is not fully equivalent to the oracle procedure in terms
of the constants in the estimation error bounds. Suppose that we know the
support Θ of Σ, i.e. locations of the nonzero entries in Σ. Then, the oracle
estimator is simply Σ̆ = {ŝmk 1{(m, k) ∈ Θ}}pm,k=1 and we have
kΣ̆ − Σk2 ≤ max
m≤p
p
X
|ŝmk − σmk |1{(m, k) ∈ Θ}
k=1
≤ kŜ − Σk max
m≤p
p
X
1{(m, k) ∈ Θ} = τ ζp .
k=1
Therefore, the constant of the convergence rate for the bootstrap method
does not attain the oracle estimator. However, we shall comment that β is
not a tuning parameter since it does not depend on F and the effect of β
only appears in the constants in front of the convergence rates (16) and (17).
Assuming that the observations are subgaussian(ν 2 ) and the variance
factorpν 2 is a fixed constant, it is known that the threshold value τ∆ =
C(ν) log(p)/n achieves the minimax rate for estimating the sparse covariance matrix [11]. Compared with the minimax optimal tuning parameter
τ∆ , our bootstrap threshold τ∗ exhibits several advantages which we shall
highlight (with stronger side conditions). First, τ∆ is non-adaptive since the
constant C(ν) > 0 depends on the underlying distribution F through ν 2 and
it is more conservative than the bootstrap threshold τ∗ in view of (18). The
reason is that the minimax lower bound is based on the worst case analysis and the matching upper bound is obtained by the union bound which
ignores the dependence structures in F . On the contrary, τ∗ takes into account the dependence information of F by conditioning on the observations.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
16
CHEN
Second, the bootstrap threshold τ∗ does not need the knowledge of ν 2 and
it allows ν 2 to increase
with n and p. In this case, the universal thresholding
p
rule τ∆ = C 0 ν log(p)/n even for Σ ∈ G(r, C0 , ζp ), in which the variances
σkk , k = 1, · · · , p, are uniformly bounded by a constant. In contrast, from
(18), the bootstrap threshold τ∗ = OP ((log(p)/n)1/2 ), where the constant of
OP (·) depends only on α, β, C1 , · · · , C5 . Therefore τ∗ = oP (τ∆ ) as ν 2 → ∞
and τ∗ can potentially gain much tighter performance bounds than τ∆ . One
exception for ruling out the increasing ν 2 when maxk≤p σkk ≤ C0 is the
Gaussian distribution Xi ∼ N (0, Σ). However, the main focus of this paper
is the statistical estimation and inference for high-dimensional non-Gaussian
data and therefore the Gaussian example is not so interesting here. Third,
as we shall demonstrate in Theorem 4.2, the Gaussian type convergence rate
of the bootstrap method in Theorem 4.1 remains valid even for heavy-tailed
data with polynomial moments. Specifically, we have the following result.
Theorem 4.2 (Adaptive threshold selection by wild bootstrap: uniform
polynomial moment observations). Let Xi be iid mean zero random vectors
such that k max1≤k≤p |X1k |k8 ≤ ν and Σ ∈ G(r, C0 , ζp ). Suppose that there
exist constants Ci > 0, i = 1, · · · , 4, such that {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 , kX1k k4 ≤
C2 , kX1k k6 ≤ C3 ν 1/3 and kX1k k8 ≤ C4 ν 1/2 for all j, k = 1, · · · , p. Let
β ∈ (0, 1) and τ∗ = β −1 aL̂∗ (1−α), where the bootstrap samples are generated
0
with the covariance matrix kernel in (2). If ν 8 log7 (np) ≤ C5 n1−K for some
K ∈ (0, 1), then (16) and (17) hold with probability at least 1 − α − Cn−K/12
for some constant C > 0 depending only on C1 , · · · , C5 . In addition, (18)
holds for some constant C 0 > 0 depending only on α and C1 , · · · , C5 .
From Theorem 4.2, the subgaussian assumption on F is not essential:
for the non-Gaussian data with heavier tails than subgaussian, the thresholded covariance matrix estimator with the threshold selected by the wild
bootstrap approach again attains the Gaussian type convergence rate at the
asymptotic confidence level 100(1 − α)%. In particular, the dimension p may
still be allowed to increase subexponentially fast in the sample size n. The
cost of the heavy-tailed distribution F is only a sacrifice of the convergence
rate from n−K/8 to n−K/12 . However, as commented in Remark 2, this gap
becomes smaller and eventually vanishes for stronger moment conditions
(here, we need q ≥ 16).
Next, we compare Theorem 4.2 with the threshold obtained by the union
bound approach. Assume that E|X1k |q < ∞ for q ≥ 8. By the Nagaev
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
17
inequality [44] applied to the split sample in Remark 4, one can show that
τ] = Cq
n p4/q
log p 1/2 o
ξ
+
ξ4 ,
q
n
n1−2/q
where ξq = max kX1k kq ,
1≤k≤p
is the right threshold that gives a large probability bound for τ = kŜ − Σk.
For q = 8, we see that τ∗ = oP (τ] ) when n1/2 = o(p). Therefore, in high
dimensional settings, the bootstrap method adapts to the dependence in F
and gives better convergence rate under the spectral and Frobenius norms.
Moreover, for observations with polynomial moments, the minimax lower
bound is currently not available to justify τ] .
4.2. Simultaneous inference for covariance and rank correlation matrices.
Another related important problem of estimating the sparse covariance matrix Σ is the consistent recovery of its support, i.e. non-zero off-diagonal
entries in Σ [33]. Towards this end, a lower bound of the minimum signal
strength (Σ-min condition) is a necessary condition to separate the weak
signals and true zeros. Yet, the Σ-min condition is never verifiable. To avoid
this undesirable condition, we can alternatively formulate the recovery problem as a more general hypothesis testing problem
(20)
H0 : Σ = Σ0
versus
H1 : Σ 6= Σ0 ,
where Σ0 is a known p × p matrix. In particular, if Σ0 = Idp×p , then the
support recovery can be re-stated as the following simultaneously testing
problem: for all m, k ∈ {1, · · · , p} and m 6= k,
(21)
H0,mk : σmk = 0
versus H1,mk : σmk 6= 0.
The test statistic we construct is T̄0 = kŜ − Σ0 koff , which is an `∞ type
statistic by taking the maximum magnitudes on the off-diagonal entries.
Then H0 is rejected if T̄0 ≥ aL̂∗ (1 − α).
0
Corollary 4.3 (Asymptotic size of the simultaneous test: subgaussian
observations). Let ν ≥ 1 and Xi be iid mean zero random vectors such
that Xik ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ) for all k = 1, · · · , p. Suppose that there exist
constants Ci > 0, i = 1, · · · , 4, such that {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 , kX1k k4 ≤ C2 ,
kX1k k6 ≤ C3 ν 1/3 and kX1k k8 ≤ C4 ν 1/2 for all j, k = 1, · · · , p. Let β ∈ (0, 1)
and τ∗ = β −1 aL̂∗ (1 − α), where the bootstrap samples are generated with
0
the covariance matrix kernel in (2). If ν 4 log7 (np) ≤ C5 n1−K for some
K ∈ (0, 1), then the above test based on T̄0 for (20) has the size α+O(n−K/8 );
i.e. the family-wise error rate of the simultaneous test problem (21) is asymptotically controlled at the level α.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
18
CHEN
From Corollary 4.3, the test based on T̄0 is asymptotically exact of size
α for subgaussian data. A similar result can be established for observations
with polynomial moments. Due to the space limit, the details are omitted.
[12] proposed a similar test statistic for comparing the two-sample large covariance matrices. Their results (Theorem 1 in [12]) are analogous to Corollary 4.3 in this paper in that no structural assumptions in Σ are needed in
order to obtain the asymptotic validity of both tests. However, we shall note
that their assumptions (C.1), (C.2), and (C.3) on the non-degeneracy are
stronger than our condition {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 . For subgaussian observations
Xik ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ), (C.3) in [12] assumed that min1≤j≤k≤p sjk /ν 4 ≥ c
for some constant c > 0, where sjk = Var(X1j X1k ). If ν 2 → ∞, then [12,
Theorem 1] requires that sjk for all j, k = 1, · · · , p have to obey a uniform
lower bound that diverges to infinity. For the covariance matrix kernel, since
g(x) = (xx> − Σ)/2, we only need that minj,k sjk ≥ c for some fixed lower
bound.
Next, we comment that a distinguishing feature of our bootstrap test from
the `2 test statistic [13] is that no structural assumptions are made on F
and we allow for the strong dependence in Σ. For example, consider again
the elliptic distributions with the positive-definite V = %1p 1>
p + (1 − %)Idp×p
such that the covariance matrix Σ is proportion to V . Then, we have
tr(V 4 ) = p[1 + (p − 1)%2 ]2 + p(p − 1)[2% + (p − 2)%2 ]2 ,
tr(V 2 ) = %2 p2 + (1 − %2 )p.
For any % ∈ (0, 1), tr(V 4 )/tr2 (V 2 ) → 1 as p → ∞. Therefore, the limiting distribution of the `2 test statistic in [13] is no longer normal and its
asymptotic distribution remains unclear.
Finally, the covariance matrix testing problem (20) can be generalized
further to nonparametric forms which can gain more robustness to outliers
and the nonlinearity in the dependency structures. Let U = E[h(X1 , X2 )]
be the expectation of the random matrix associated with h and U0 be a
known p × p matrix. Consider the testing problem
H0 : U = U0
versus
H1 : U 6= U0 .
Then, the test statistic can be constructed as T̄0 = kU − U0 k (or T̄00 =
kU − U0 koff ) and H0 is rejected if T̄0 ≥ aL̂∗ (1 − α) (or T̄00 ≥ aL̂∗ (1 − α)),
0
0
where the bootstrap samples are generated w.r.t. the kernel h. The above
test covers Kendall’s tau rank correlation matrix as a special case where h
is the bounded kernel defined in (3).
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
19
Corollary 4.4 (Asymptotic size of the simultaneous test for Kendall’s
tau correlation matrix). Let Xi be iid random vectors following the distribution F in Rp . Suppose that there exists a constant C1 > 0 such that
{Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 for all j, k = 1, · · · , p. Let β ∈ (0, 1) and τ∗ = β −1 aL̂∗ (1−
0
α), where the bootstrap samples are generated with Kendall’s tau rank correlation matrix kernel in (3). If log7 (np) ≤ C2 n1−K for some K ∈ (0, 1),
then the test based on T̄00 has the size α + O(n−K/8 ).
Therefore, the asymptotic validity of the bootstrap test for large Kendall’s
tau rank correlation matrix is obtained when log p = o(n1/7 ) without imposing structural and moment assumptions on F .
5. Proofs of the main results. The rest of the paper is organized as
follows. In Section 5.1, we first present a useful inequality for bounding the
expectation of the sup-norm of the canonical U-statistics and then compare
with an alternative simple data splitting bound by reducing to the moment
bounding exercise for the sup-norm of sums of iid random matrices. We shall
discuss several advantages of using the U-statistics approach by exploring
the degeneracy structure. Section 5.2 contains the proofs of the main results
on Gaussian approximation and Section 5.3 proves the convergence rate of
the Gaussian wild bootstrap. Proofs of the statistical applications are given
in Section 5.4. Additional proofs and technical lemmas are given in the SM.
5.1. A maximal inequality for canonical U-statistics. Before proving our
main results, we first establish a maximal inequality of the canonical Ustatistics of order two. The derived expectation bound is useful in controlling the size of the nonlinear and completely degenerate error term in the
Gaussian approximation.
Theorem 5.1 (Expectation bound for canonical U-statistics). Let f :
Rp × Rp → Rp×p be a P
symmetric and canonical U-statistic kernel of or−1
der two and V = n2
1≤i<j≤n f (Xi , Xj ) such that Ekf (X1 , X2 )k < ∞.
n
0
Let X 1 be an independent copy of Xn1 , M = max1≤i<j≤n (kf (Xi , Xj )k ∨
kf (Xi , X0j )k), Dq = max1≤m,k≤p (E|fmk |q )1/q for q > 0. If 2 ≤ p ≤ exp(bn)
for some absolute constant b > 0, then there exists an absolute constant
K > 0 such that
n log p 3/2
log p 5/4 o
log p
(22) EkV k ≤ K(1 ∨ b1/2 )
kM k4 +
D2 +
D4 .
n
n
n
Note that Theorem 5.1 is non-asymptotic. As immediate consequences of
Theorem 5.1, we can derive the rate of convergence of EkV k with kernels
under the subexponential and uniform polynomial moment conditions.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
20
CHEN
Corollary 5.2 (Kernel with subexponential moment). Let Bn be a
sequence of positive reals and f be a symmetric and canonical kernel. Suppose
that
(23)
max E [exp(|fmk |/Bn )] ≤ 2
1≤m,k≤p
and 2 ≤ p ≤ exp(bn) for some absolute constant b > 0. Then, there exists a
constant C(b) > 0 such that
(24)
EkV k ≤ C(b)Bn {n−3/2 (log p)3/2 log(np) + n−1 log p}.
Corollary 5.3 (Kernel with uniform polynomial moment). Let q ≥ 4
and Bn , Bn0 be two sequences of positive reals. Let f be a symmetric and
canonical kernel. Suppose that
(25)
E(kf k/Bn )q + max E(|fmk |/Bn0 )4 ≤ 1
1≤m,k≤p
and 2 ≤ p ≤ exp(bn) for some absolute constant b > 0. Then, there exists a
constant C(b) > 0 such that
(26)
EkV k ≤ C(b){Bn n−1 (log p)3/2 + Bn0 n−1 log p}.
Remark 4 (Comparison of Theorem 5.1 with sums of iid random matrices). For the U -statistic taking values in a Banach space B (here, we
consider B = Rp×p ), its expected norm can also be bounded by the expected
norm of sums of iid random matrices. Assume that Ekf (X1 , X2 )k < ∞ and
let m = [n/2] be the largest integer no greater than n/2. As noted in [29],
we can write
(27)
m
1 X X
m(V − EV ) =
[f (Xπn (2i−1) , Xπn (2i) ) − Ef ],
n!
all πn i=1
P
where the summation all πn is taken over all possible permutations πn :
{1, · · · , n} → {1, · · · , n}. By Jensen’s inequality and the iid assumption of
Xi , we have
(28)
EkV − EV k ≤
m
X
1
E
[f (Xi , Xi+m ) − Ef ] ,
m
i=1
which can be viewed as a data splitting method into two halves. Under
condition (23), it follows from Bernstein’s inequality [54, Proposition 5.16]
that
p
(29)
EkV − EV k ≤ K1 Bn ( log(p)/n + log(p)/n).
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
21
So if log p ≤ bn1−ε for some ε ∈ (0, 1), then EkV −EV k ≤ C(b)Bn (log(p)/n)1/2 .
There are three advantages of using the U-statistics approach in Theorem
5.1 over the data splitting method into iid summands (28) and (29). For the
canonical kernel, EV = 0.
First, we can obtain from (24) that
EkV k ≤ C(b)Bn {n1−5ε/2 + n−3/2ε (log n) + n−ε }.
Therefore, sharper rate is obtained by (24) when ε ∈ (1/2, 1) which covers
the regime of valid Gaussian approximation and bootstrap. Under the scaling
limit for the Gaussian approximation validity, i.e. Bna log7 (np)/n ≤ Cn−K2
for some K2 ∈ (0, 1), where a = 2 for the subexponential moment kernel
and a = 4 for the uniform polynomial moment kernel, it is easy to see that
log p ≤ log(np) ≤ Cn(1−K2 )/7 so we can take ε = (6 + K2 )/7.
Second and more importantly, the rate of convergence obtained by the
Bernstein bound (29) does not lead to a convergence rate for the Gaussian
approximation and the bootstrap method. Following the argument of proving Theorem 5.5, one can only show with (29) that for any γ ∈ (0, 1) and
`n = log(np/γ) ≥ 1
3
2 1/4
1/2
−1/2 3/2
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−1/8 `7/8
+ `1/2
`n u(γ) + γ,
n (D̃3 + D̃4 )
n Bn + n
where the second term on the right-hand side does not converge to zero and
u(γ) is defined in the proof of Theorem 5.5. The reason is that, although
(29) is rate-exact for non-degenerate U-statistics, where the dependence of
the rate in (29) on the sample size is O(Bn n−1/2 ), it is not strong enough
√
to control the size of the nonlinear correction term Ek nV k when p → ∞
√
(recall that W = nV ). On the contrary, our bound in Theorem 5.1 exploits
the degeneracy structure of V and the dependence of the rate in (22) on
the sample size is O(Bn n−1 + kM kn−3/2 ). Therefore, Theorem 5.1 is more
mathematically appealing in the degenerate case.
Third, the reduction to sums of iid random matrices in (28) does not
give tight asymptotic distributions in order to make inference on the nondegenerate U-statistics. To illustrate this point, we consider the case p = 1
and let Xi be iid mean zero random variables with variance σ 2 . Let ζ12 =
Var(g(X1 )) and ζ22 = Var(h(X1 , X2 )). Assume that ζ12 > 0. So ζ12 is the
variance of the leading projection term used in the Gaussian approximation
√
D
and by Jensen’s inequality ζ12 ≤ ζ22 . Note that n(U − EU ) → N (0, 4ζ12 ) [51,
p
P
D
Theorem A, page 192] and by the CLT 2/m m
i=1 [f (Xi , Xi+m ) − Ef ] →
N (0, 2ζ22 ). Since in general ζ22 6= 2ζ12 , the limiting distribution of the Ustatistic is not the same as that in the data splitting method in view of
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
22
CHEN
(27). For example, consider the non-degenerate covariance kernel h(x1 , x2 ) =
−1 P
4
(x1 − x2 )2 /2 w.r.t. F and U = n2
1≤i<j≤n h(Xi , Xj ). Denote µ4 = EX1
and g(x1 ) = (x21 −σ 2 )/2. Then, ζ22 = (µ4 +σ 4 )/2 and ζ12 = (µ4 −σ 4 )/4 so that
ζ22 > 2ζ12 when σ 2 > 0. In particular, if Xi are iid N (0, σ 2 ), then µ4 = 3σ 4 ,
4ζ12 = 2σ 4 , and 2ζ22 = 4σ 4 . Therefore, even though (29) gives better rate
in the non-degenerate case, the reduction by splitting the data into the iid
summands is not optimal for the Gaussian approximation purpose, which
is the main motivation of this paper. In fact, ζ22 serves no purpose in the
√
limiting distribution of n(U − EU ).
5.2. Proof of results in Section 2. Let β > 0 and for Z ∈ Rp×p
Fβ (Z) = β −1 log(
p
X
exp(βZmk ))
m,k=1
be the smooth-max function for approximating Z̄0 = max1≤m,k≤p Zmk . Denote πmk (Z) = ∂mk Fβ (Z) as the first-order partial derivative w.r.t. Zmk
and Cb3 (R) the space of all bounded functions that are three times continuously differentiable on R with supt∈R |∂ q f (t)| < +∞ for q = 0, 1, 2, 3. Let
λ0 : R → [0, 1] be such that: (i) λ0 ∈ Cb3 (R) and sups∈R |∂ q λ0 (s)| ≤ K0
for some absolute constant K0 > 0 and for q = 0, 1, 2, 3; (ii) λ0 (s) = 1 if
s ≤ 0 and λ0 (s) = 0 if s ≥ 1. Let eβ = 2β −1 log p and for any t ∈ R,
let λ(s) = λ0 (ψ(s − t − eβ )) for ψ > 0. Then sups∈R |∂ q λ(s)| ≤ K0 ψ q for
q = 0, 1, 2, 3. Here, β and ψ are smoothing parameters for approximating
the max and indicator functions, respectively. In particular, we have
Z̄0 ≤ Fβ (Z) ≤ Z̄0 + eβ
(30)
for all Z ∈ Rp×p ,
(31) 1(s ≤ t + eβ ) ≤ λ(s) ≤ 1(s ≤ t + eβ + ψ −1 )
for all s, t ∈ R.
Define
D̃q =
max (E|gmk |q )1/q ,
1≤m,k≤p
Dq =
max (E|hmk |q )1/q .
1≤m,k≤p
Clearly D̃q ≤ Dq for q ≥ 1. Let
2
2
ux (γ) = inf{u ≥ 0 : P(gmk
(Xi ) ≤ u2 Egmk
for all m, k, i) ≥ 1 − γ}
and uz (γ) be similarly defined with gmk (Xi ) replaced by Zi,mk , where Zi
follow iid N (0, Γg ). Put u(γ) = ux (γ) ∨ uz (γ). To prove Theorem 2.1 and
2.2, we first need a smoothing lemma.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
23
√
√
Lemma 5.4. Let u > 0, γ ∈ (0, 1). Assume that c0 ≤ D̃2 ≤ C0 , 8uD̃2 β/ n ≤
1 and u ≥ u(γ). Then we have
p
(32)
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) ≤ C1 [(ψEkW k + ∆v ) + (eβ + ψ −1 ) 1 ∨ log(pψ)],
where
p
(33) ∆v = n−1/2 (ψ 3 +ψ 2 β +ψβ 2 )D̃33 +(ψ 2 +ψβ)ϕ̄(u)+ψ ϕ̄(u) log(p/γ)+γ
and ϕ̄(u) = C2 u−1 D̃42 . Here, C1 , C2 > 0 are constants only depending on c0
and C0 .
Theorem 5.5 (Rate of convergence for Gaussian approximation). Let
γ ∈ (0, 1) and `n = log(pn/γ) ≥ 1. Assume c0 ≤ D̃2 ≤ C0 and 2 ≤ p ≤
exp(bn) for some absolute constants c0 , C0 , b > 0. Then, there exists a constant C > 0 depending only on c0 , C0 , and b such that
n
1/2
1/2
3
2 1/4
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) ≤ C n−1/8 `7/8
+ n−1/2 `n kM k4 + n−1/4 `n3/4 D2
n (D̃3 + D̃4 )
o
1/2
(34)
+n−3/8 `n7/8 D4 + n−1/2 `n3/2 u(γ) + γ .
Proof sketch of Theorem 5.5. The proof is based on a delicate combination of Lemma 5.4 and Theorem 5.1. Since the proof of Theorem 5.5 is
quite involved, here we only explain the main idea and give a sketch of the
proof. All proof details can be found in the SM.
Main idea. Lemma 5.4 gives a general rate of convergence for the Gaussian approximation with some unspecified smoothing parameters β and ψ.
The error bound in Lemma 5.4 involves three parts: (i) one from approximating the linear projection ∆v , (ii) one from the second-order canonical
remainder W , and (iii) one from the smoothing errors of the max and indicator functions. Recall that β is the degree of smoothing for the max function
(30) and ψ controls the approximation of the indicator function (31). For
larger β > 0 (or ψ > 0), Fβ (Z) (or λ(s)) is closer to the non-smooth function maxm,k Zmk (or 1(s ≤ t + eβ )). Specifically, for larger β and ψ, (iii)
contributes less, while (i) and (ii) contribute more, to the error bound for
the Gaussian approximation (32). Hence, the key step is to optimize the
Gaussian approximation error bound (32) on the smoothing parameters β
and ψ to find the best trade-off of the three parts.
Step 1. Choose the smoothing parameters. Note that both β and
ψ depend on the truncation parameter u in Lemma 5.4. Therefore, the optimization problem eventually boils down to choose a proper threshold u.
Once u is chosen, then we shall first have a natural choice of β to make
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
24
CHEN
√
√
the constraint of Lemma 5.4 on 8uD̃2 β/ n ≤ 1 active in order to apply
(32); i.e β = Cn−1/2 u−1 . So β is a strictly decreasing function in u and
we need to choose a non-decreasing ψ(u) to counter-balance the smoothing
errors. Motivated from the proof of [16, Theorem 2.2] in which only the
linear part of T̄0 was dealt with, here we need to choose a larger u because
of the extra nonlinear term W . Since in the linear case of [16, Theorem 2.2]
−5/8 3/4
−5/8 1/2
u = max{u0 , u1 , u(γ)} where u0 = n3/8 `n D̃4 and u1 = n3/8 `n D̃3 ,
it is intuitive to choose u = max{u0 , u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 , u(γ)} in our case such
i2 T εi3 , where T = kM k , D , D for i = 2, 3, 4
that ui takes the form nεi1 `−ε
i
4
2
4
n
i
and the corresponding indicator smoothing parameters as
ψi (u) = min{n1/2−εi1 `εni2 −1 Ti−εi3 ,
`n−1/6 (ϕ̄(u))−1/3 },
where ϕ̄(u) is defined in Lemma 5.4. For i = 2, 3, 4, we require different
{εij }j=1,2,3 , to balance the error bound (32). Let u∗i be the solution for
balancing the two components in ψi (u). Then, ψi (u) is strictly increasing
when u ∈ (0, u∗i ) and it is truncated to a constant level for u ≥ u∗i .
Step 2. Calculate the error bound for the chosen parameters.
Now, we invoke Theorem 5.1 to quantify the contributions of kM k4 , D2 ,
and D4 to EkW k. Combining (22) and (32), it will be shown (after some
algebraic manipulations on the two cases 0 < u < u∗ and u ≥ u∗ , where u∗ =
max1≤i≤4 {u∗i }) that the optimal choice of {εij }j=1,2,3 in order to achieve the
overall error bound
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−1/2 `3/2
n u+γ
(35)
−1/2
1/2
−3/4
1/2
−5/8
1/2
is given by u2 = `n kM k4 , u3 = n1/4 `n D2 , and u4 = n1/8 `n D4 .
Then, the explicit rate of convergence (34) is immediate by substituting the
choice of u into (35).
In the following proofs of Theorem 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1, the constants of .
depend only on C1 and C2 in (GA.1) and (GA.2) in the sub-exponential
kernel case and (GA.1’) and (GA.2’) in the uniform polynomial kernel case.
Proof of Theorem 2.1. Choose γ = n−K1 for some K1 ≥ 1/8. Let
`n = log(pn1+K1 ). By Theorem 5.5 and Lemma A.1, we have
−1/4 3/4
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−1/8 `n7/8 Bn1/4 + n−1/2 `n Bn1/2 `1/2
`n
n +n
+n−3/8 `n7/8 Bn1/4 + n−1/2 `n3/2 Bn `2n + γ
. n−1/8 `n7/8 Bn1/4 + n−1/2 `n7/2 Bn + n−K1 .
By (8), we have ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n− min(K1 ,K/8) . Since K ∈ (0, 1), (9) follows.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
25
Proof of Theorem 2.2. Choose γ = n−K1 for some K1 ∈ (0, K). Let
`n = log(pn1+K1 ). By Theorem 5.5 and Lemma A.3 with q = 4, we have
1/4
−1/2
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−1/8 `7/8
`n Bn1/2 n1/4 + n−1/4 `3/4
n Bn + n
n
+n−3/8 `n7/8 Bn1/4 + n−1/2 `n3/2 Bn n
1/4
3/2
. n−1/8 `7/8
n Bn + `n Bn n
K K−K1
,K1 )
4
. n− min( 8 ,
1−K
− 4 1
1+K1
4
+γ
+ n−K1
.
Choose K1 ∈ [K/8, K/2]. Then, it follows that ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−K/8 .
5.3. Proof of results in Section 3.
Proof of Theorem 3.1. Let ρ (α) = P({T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)} {L̄0 ≤ aZ̄0 (α)}),
0
where aZ̄0 (α) = inf{t ∈ R : P(Z̄0 ≤ t) ≥ α} is the α-th quantile of Z̄0 and
A B = (A\B)∪(B \A) is the symmetric difference of two subsets A and B.
Let `n = log(np) ≥ 1. We first deal with the sub-exponential kernel moment
condition. Assume (GA.1) and (GA.2). The proof contains two steps.
Step 1. Relate the bootstrap approximation to the Gaussian approximation.
Note that for all α ∈ (0, 1)
|P(T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)) − α| ≤ ρ(L̄0 , Z̄0 ) + |P(T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)) − P(L̄0 ≤ aZ̄0 (α))|
0
0
≤ ρ(L̄0 , Z̄0 ) + ρ (α).
Under conditions (GA.1) and (GA.2), following the proof of Theorem 5.5
and Theorem 2.1, we have ρ(L̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−K/8 . Let ∆1 be defined in (57). By
Lemma C.2, we can bound ρ (α) as
(36)
h
i
ρ (α) ≤ 2 ρ(L̄0 , Z̄0 ) + Cv 1/3 (log p)2/3 + P(∆1 > v) + C 0 ζ1 (log p)1/2 + 5ζ2 ,
provided that
P(|T̄0 − L̄0 | > ζ1 ) < ζ2 ,
(37)
(38)
P(Pe (|L̂∗0
−
L̄∗0 |
> ζ1 ) > ζ2 ) < ζ2 ,
(effect of W ),
(effect of ∆2 ),
where (37) is due to the nonlinear remainder of the U-statistics decomposition and (38) is due to the estimation error of g(Xi ). Choose ζ1 =
−1/2
Cn−K1 `n
and ζ2 = Cn−K2 for some K1 , K2 > 0 whose values are to be
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
26
CHEN
√
−1/2
determined in Step 2. Then, ζ1 log p ≤ Cn−K1 . Choose v = `n (E∆1 )3/4 .
−1/2
By Lemma C.3, v . `n $1 (n, p)3/4 , where $1 (n, p) is defined in (56). By
Markov’s inequality,
1/4
P(∆1 > v) ≤ E(∆1 )/v = `1/2
. `n1/2 $1 (n, p)1/4 ,
n (E∆1 )
1/2
1/2
where under (GA.2) $1 (n, p) ≤ n−1/2 `n Bn + n−1 `3n Bn2 . n−1/2 `n Bn .
Therefore, we have
−3K/8
v . `−1/2
(n−1/2 `n1/2 Bn )3/4 . `−2
.
n
n n
So it follows that (v 1/2 log p)2/3 . n−K/8 and
−1/2 1/2
P(∆1 > v) . `1/2
`n Bn )1/4 . n−K/8 .
n (n
Substituting those bounds into (36), we get
(39)
ρ (α) . n−K/8 + n−K1 + n−K2 . n− min{K/8, K1 , K2 } .
Step 2. Verify the constraints (37) and (38).
Since max is a 1-Lipschitz function and by Markov’s inequality and Lemma
C.5, we have P(|T̄0 − L̄0 | > ζ1 ) ≤ EkW k/ζ1 ≤ C$3 (n, p)ζ1−1 , where $3 (n, p)
is defined in (61). Then, (37) is fulfilled whenever Cζ1 ζ2 ≥ $3 (n, p) for some
constant C > 0. Next, we deal with (38). Note that
n
X
1
|L̂∗0 − L̄∗0 | ≤ √
max
[ĝi,mk − gmk (Xi )]ei .
n 1≤m,k≤p
i=1
By the argument leading to (46), conditional on Xn1 and X0 n1 , we have
n
nX
o1/2
K3
Ee |L̂∗0 − L̄∗0 | ≤ √ (log p)1/2 max
[ĝi,mk − gmk (Xi )]2
,
1≤m,k≤p
n
i=1
from which it follows that
1/2
E|L̂∗0 − L̄∗0 | ≤ K3 (log p)1/2 E(∆2 )
and ∆2 is defined in (58). By Markov’s inequality (also conditional on Xn1
and X0 n1 ), Pe (|L̂∗0 − L̄∗0 | > ζ1 ) ≤ ζ1−1 Ee |L̂∗0 − L̄∗0 | so that
P(Pe (|L̂∗0 − L̄∗0 | > ζ1 ) > ζ2 ) ≤ P(Ee |L̂∗0 − L̄∗0 | > ζ1 ζ2 )
1/2
≤
K3 (log p)1/2 E(∆2 )
E|L̂∗0 − L̄∗0 |
≤
.
ζ1 ζ2
ζ1 ζ2
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
27
√
By Lemma C.4, (38) is fulfilled when $2 (n, p) ≤ Cζ1 ζ22 / log p. Recall that
we need to check
(40)
n−(K1 +K2 )
$3 (n, p) ≤ Cζ1 ζ2 = C p
,
log(np)
(41)
n−(K1 +2K2 )
ζ1 ζ 2
p
$2 (n, p) ≤ C √ 2 = C √
.
log p
log p log(np)
By Lemma C.4 and C.5
$3 (n, p) ≤ n−1 (log(np))5/2 Bn + n−1/2 (log p) + n−3/4 (log(np))5/4 Bn1/2 ,
$2 (n, p) ≤ n−1/2 (log(np))3/2 Bn + n−1 (log(np))2 Bn .
So sufficient conditions for (40) and (41) are given by
(42)
(43)
n−1 `3n Bn + n−1/2 `n3/2 + n−3/4 `n7/4 Bn1/2 . n−(K1 +K2 ) ,
−1 3
−(K1 +2K2 )
n−1/2 `5/2
.
n B n + n `n B n . n
Under (GA.2), since the LHS of (42) is bounded by n−K +n−K/2 +n−3K/4 ≤
3n−K/2 and the LHS of (43) is bounded by 2n−K/2 , we deduce that K1 and
K2 must satisfy the constraint K1 + 2K2 ≤ K/2. Take K1 = K2 = K/6.
Then we obtain from (39) that
|P(T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)) − α| . n− min{K/8, K/6} = n−K/8 .
0
Similar argument applies to the kernel with uniform polynomial moment,
so we only sketch the proof in this case. Assume (GA.1’) and (GA.2’).
−1/2
Step 1’. We shall use the same v = `n (E∆1 )3/4 as in the sub-exponential
kernel case. Under (GA.1’) and (GA.2’), by Lemma C.6 with q = 4, we
2/3
−1/2
have $1 (n, p) . n−1/2 `n Bn2 and v . `n (n−1/2 `n Bn2 )3/4 = (n−1 `n Bn4 )3/8 .
Therefore, (v 1/2 log p)2/3 . (n−1 `6n Bn4 )1/8 . n−K/8 and
P(∆1 > v) . `n1/2 (n−1/2 `n Bn2 )1/4 . n−K/8 .
Then, by (36), we get ρ (α) . n− min{K/8, K1 , K2 } .
Step 2’. By Lemma C.7 and C.8 with q = 4, we must verify the constraints
−3/4 7/4 1/2
n−1/2 `2n Bn + n−1/2 `3/2
`n Bn
. n−(K1 +K2 ) ,
n +n
−1/2 2
n−1/4 `3/2
`n Bn . n−(K1 +2K2 ) .
n Bn + n
Under (GA.2’), a sufficient condition for the last two inequalities to hold is
K1 + 2K2 ≤ K/4. Then, we can take K1 = K2 = K/12 to get ρ (α) .
n−K/12 and thus (14).
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
28
CHEN
5.4. Proof of results in Section 4.
Proof of Theorem 4.1. Let β ∈ (0, 1) and τ = β −1 kŜ − Σk. By the
subgaussian assumption and Lemma A.2, it is easy to verify that there is a
large enough constant C > 0 depending only on C2 , C3 , C4 such that
max E[|hmk |2+` /(Cν 2` )] ∨ E[exp(|hmk |/ν 2 )] ≤ 2,
(44)
`=0,1,2
where h is the covariance matrix kernel in (2). Since {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1
for all j, k = 1, · · · , p and ν 4 log7 (np) ≤ C5 n1−K , by Theorem 3.1, we have
kŜ − Σk ≤ aL̂∗ (1 − α) with probability at least 1 − α − Cn−K/8 , where C > 0
0
is a constant depending only on Ci , i = 1, · · · , 5. Therefore, P(τ ≤ τ∗ ) ≥
1 − α − Cn−K/8 and the rest of the proof is restricted to the event {τ ≤ τ∗ }.
By the decomposition
ρ(Σ̂(τ∗ ) − Σ) ≤ ρ(Σ̂(τ∗ ) − Tτ∗ (Σ)) + ρ(Tτ∗ (Σ) − Σ)
≤ I + II + III + τ∗1−r ζp ,
where Tτ (Σ) = {σmk 1{|σmk | > τ }}pm,k=1 is the resulting matrix of the
thresholding operator on Σ and
X
I = max
|ŝmk |1{|ŝmk | > τ∗ , |σmk | ≤ τ∗ },
m
k
II = max
m
|σmk |1{|ŝmk | ≤ τ∗ , |σmk | > τ∗ },
k
III = max
m
X
X
|ŝmk − σmk |1{|ŝmk | > τ∗ , |σmk | > τ∗ }.
k
Note that on the event {τ ≤ τ∗ }, maxm,k |ŝmk − σmk | ≤ βτ∗ . Since Σ ∈
G(r, C0 , ζp ), we can bound
III ≤ (βτ∗ )(τ∗−r ζp ) = βτ∗1−r ζp .
By triangle inequality,
X
X
II ≤ max
|ŝmk − σmk |1{|σmk | > τ∗ } + max
|ŝmk |1{|ŝmk | ≤ τ∗ , |σmk | > τ∗ }
m
≤
m
k
(βτ∗ )(τ∗−r ζp )
+
τ∗ (τ∗−r ζp )
= (1 +
k
β)τ∗1−r ζp .
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
29
Let η ∈ (0, 1). We have I ≤ IV + V + V I, where
X
IV = max
|σmk |1{|ŝmk | > τ∗ , |σmk | ≤ τ∗ },
m
V
= max
m
V I = max
m
k
X
|ŝmk − σmk |1{|ŝmk | > τ∗ , |σmk | ≤ ητ∗ },
k
X
|ŝmk − σmk |1{|ŝmk | > τ∗ , ητ∗ < |σmk | ≤ τ∗ }.
k
Clearly, IV ≤ τ∗1−r ζp . On the indicator event of V , we observe that
βτ∗ ≥ |ŝmk − σmk | ≥ |ŝmk | − |σmk | > (1 − η)τ∗ .
Therefore, V = 0 if η + β ≤ 1. For V I, we have
V I ≤ (βτ∗ )(ητ∗ )−r ζp .
Collecting all terms, we conclude that
ρ(Σ̂(τ∗ ) − Σ) ≤ (3 + 2β + η −r β)ζp τ∗1−r + V.
Then (16) follows from the choice η = 1 − β. The Frobenius norm rate (17)
can be established similarly. Details are omitted.
Next, we prove (18). Let Φ(·) denote the cdf of the standard Gaussian
random variable. By the union bound, we have for all t > 0
n
h
t i
2 X
ĝi ei ≥ t ≤ 2p2 1 − Φ ¯ ,
Pe √
n
ξ
i=1
Pn
−1/2 β −1 ξΦ
2
2 = 4n−1
¯ −1 (1−
where ξ¯ = max1≤m,k≤p ξmk and ξmk
i=1 ĝi,mk . Let τ̃ = n
α/(2p2 )); then τ∗ ≤ τ̃ . Since Φ−1 (1 − α/(2p2 )) (log p)1/2 , we have E[τ∗ ] ≤
1/2 , where C 0 > 0 is a constant only depending on α.
¯
C 0 β −1 E[ξ](log(p)/n)
¯ Let ∆ = n−1 maxm,k Pn [ĝi,mk − gmk (Xi )]2 . Then,
Now, we bound E[ξ].
i=1
n
X
8
2
ξ¯2 ≤ max
gmk
(Xi ) + 8∆.
n m,k
i=1
By Lemma C.4 and recall that ν 4 log7 (np) ≤ C5 n1−K ,
E[∆1/2 ] ≤ Cn−1/2 (log(pn))3/2 ν 2 ,
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
30
CHEN
where C > 0 is constant depending only on Ci , i = 1, · · · , 5. By [17, Lemma
9] and Pisier’s inequality [53, Lemma 2.2.2], we have
E[max
m,k
n
X
n
n
o
X
2
2
2
gmk
(Xi )] ≤ K1 max E[
gmk
(Xi )] + (log p)E[max max gmk
(Xi )]
m,k
i=1
m,k i≤n
i=1
n
o
≤ C n + (log(np))3 ν 4 .
By Jensen’s inequality, we get
n
o
¯ ≤ C 1 + (ν 4 log3 (np)/n)1/2 ≤ C.
E[ξ]
Then, we conclude that E[τ∗ ] ≤ C(α, C1 , · · · , C5 )β −1 (log(p)/n)1/2 .
Proof of Theorem 4.2. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 4.1
and we only sketch the differences. By the assumptions and Lemma A.4, we
have
max E[|hmk |2+` /(Cν 2` )] ∨ E[khk/(2ν 2 )]4 ≤ 1.
`=0,1,2
By Theorem 3.1, we have kŜ − Σk ≤ aL̂∗ (1 − α) with probability at least
0
1−α−Cn−K/12 , where C > 0 is constant depending only on Ci , i = 1, · · · , 5.
So (16) and (17) follow. Note that
E[max
m,k
n
X
i=1
n
n
o
X
2
2
2
gmk
(Xi )] ≤ K1 max E[
gmk
(Xi )] + (log p)E[max max gmk
(Xi )]
m,k
i=1
m,k i≤n
o
n
≤ C n + (log p)n1/2 ν 4 .
Then, under the assumption that ν 8 log7 (np) ≤ C5 n1−K , it follows from
Lemma C.7 that
o
n
1/2
1/2
2
2
2
¯ ≤ C 1 + ν log (p) + ν log (np) + ν log(np) ≤ C.
E[ξ]
n1/4
n1/4
n1/2
Therefore, we get E[τ∗ ] ≤ C(α, C1 , · · · , C5 )β −1 (log(p)/n)1/2 .
Acknowledgments. The author would like to thank two anonymous
referees, an Associate Editor, and the Co-Editor Tailen Hsing for their many
constructive comments that lead to the significant improvements of this
paper. The author is also grateful to Stephen Portnoy (UIUC), Xiaofeng
Shao (UIUC), and Wei Biao Wu (University of Chicago) for their helpful
discussions.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
31
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Supplemental Materials to: “Gaussian approximation for the
sup-norm of high-dimensional matrix-variate U-statistics and its
applications”
(). This supplemental file contains the additional proofs, technical lemmas,
and simulation results.
REFERENCES
[1] Adamczak, R. (2006). Moment inequalites for U-statistics. Annals of Probability 34
2288-2314.
[2] Arcones, M. and Giné, E. (1993). Limit theorems for U-processes. Annals of Probability 21 1494-1542.
[3] Bentkus, V. (2003). On the dependence of the Berry-Esseen bound on dimension.
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 113 385-402.
[4] Bentkus, V., Götze, F. and van Zwet, W. R. (1997). An edgeworth expansion
for symmetric statistics. Annals of Statistics 25 851-896.
[5] Bickel, P. J., Götze, F. and van Zwet, W. R. (1986). The Edgeworth expansion
for U-statistics of degree two. Annals of Statistics 14 1463-1484.
[6] Bickel, P. J. and Levina, E. (2008). Covariance Regularization by Thresholding.
Annals of Statistics 36 2577-2604.
[7] Bickel, P. J. and Levina, E. (2008). Regularized Estimation of Large Covariance
Matrices. Annals of Statistics 36 199-227.
[8] Brodie, J., Daubechies, I., De Mol, C., Giannone, D. and Loris, I. (2009).
Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 12267-12272.
[9] Bühlmann, P. and van de Geer, S. (2011). Statistics for High-Dimensional Data:
Methods, Theory and Applications. Springer Series in Statistics.
[10] Cai, T., Liu, W. and Luo, X. (2011). A Constrained `1 Minimization Approach to
Sparse Precision Matrix Estimation. Journal of American Statistical Association 106
594-607.
[11] Cai, T. and Zhou, H. (2012). Optimal Rates of Convergence for Sparse Covariance
Matrix Estimation. Annals of Statistics 40 2389-2420.
[12] Chang, J., Zhou, W., Zhou, W.-X. and Wang, L. (2016). Comparing large covariance matrices under weak conditions on the dependence structure and its application
to gene clustering. Biometrics, to appear.
[13] Chen, S. X., Zhang, L.-X. and Zhong, P.-S. (2010). Test for high-dimensional
covariance matrices. Journal of American Statistical Association 105 810-819.
[14] Chen, X., Xu, M. and Wu, W. B. (2013). Covariance and precision matrix estimation for high-dimensional time series. Annals of Statistics 41 2994-3021.
[15] Chen, X., Xu, M. and Wu, W. B. (2015). Regularized estimation of linear functionals for high-dimensional time series. Preprint, arXiv:1506.03832.
[16] Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D. and Kato, K. (2013). Gaussian approximations and multiplier bootstrap for maxima of sums of high-dimensional random
vectors. Annals of Statistics 41 2786-2819.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
32
CHEN
[17] Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D. and Kato, K. (2014). Comparison and anticoncentration bounds for maxima of Gaussian random vectors. arXiv:1301.4807v4.
[18] de la Peña, V. and Giné, E. (1999). Decoupling: From Dependence to Independence.
Springer.
[19] de la Peña, V. and Montgomery-Smith, S. (1995). Decoupling inequalities for
the tail probabilities of multivariate U-statistics. Annals of Probability 23 806-816.
[20] Dempster, A. P. (1972). Covariance selection. Biometrics 28 157-175.
[21] Einmahl, U. and Li, D. (2008). Characterization of LIL behavior in Banach space.
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 6677-6693.
[22] El Karoui, N. (2008). Operator norm consistent estimation of large dimensional
sparse covariance matrices. Annals of Statistics 36 2717-2756.
[23] Fan, J., Liao, Y. and Mincheva, M. (2011). High-dimensional covariance matrix
estimation in approximate factor models. Annals of Statistics 39 3320-3356.
[24] Giné, E., Latala, R. and Zinn, J. (2000). Exponential and moment inequalities for
U-statistics. High Dimensional Probability II, Springer.
[25] Götze, F. (1987). Approximations for multivaraite U-statistics. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 22 212-229.
[26] Gregory, G. G. (1977). Large sample theory for U-statistics and tests of fit. Annals
of Statistics 5 110-123.
[27] Guerci, J. R. (1999). Theory and Application of Covariance Matrix Tapers for
Robust Adaptive Beamforming. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 47 977985.
[28] Hoeffding, W. (1948). A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distributions.
Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19 293–325.
[29] Hoeffding, W. (1963). Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58 13-30.
[30] Houdré, C. and Reynaud-Bouret, P. (2003). Exponential inequalities, with constants, for U-statistics of order two. Stochastic Inequalities and Applications 56 55-69.
[31] Hsing, T. and Wu, W. B. (2004). On weighted U-statistics for stationary processes.
Annals of Probability 32 1600-1631.
[32] Klein, T. and Rio, E. (2005). Concentration around the mean for maxima of empirical processes. Annals of Probability 33 1060–1077.
[33] Lam, C. and Fan, J. (2009). Sparsistency and Rates of Convergence in Large Covariance Matrix Estimation. The Annals of Statistics 37 4254-4278.
[34] Lam, C. and Yao, Q. (2012). Factor modeling for high-dimensional time series:
inference for the number of factors. Ann. Statist. 40 694–726. MR2933663
[35] Latala, R. (1997). Estimation of moments of sums of independent random variables.
Annals of Probability 25 1502-1513.
[36] Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical Models. Oxford University Press.
[37] Ledoux, M. and Talagrand, M. (1991). Probability in Banach Spaces: Isoperimetry
and Processes. Springer. New York.
[38] Mai, Q., Zou, H. and Yuan, M. (2012). A direct approach to sparse discriminant
analysis in ultra-high dimensions. Biometrika 99 29-42.
[39] Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance 7 77-91.
[40] Massart, P. (2000). About the constants in Talagrand’s concentration inequalities
for empirical processes. Annals of Probability 28 863-884.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
33
[41] McMurry, T. and Politis, D. (2015). High-dimensional autocovariance matrices
and optimal linear prediction. Electronic Journal of Statistics 9 753-788.
[42] Meinshausen, N. and Bühlmann, P. (2006). High-dimensional graphs and variable
selection with the Lasso. The Annals of Statistics 34 1436-1462.
[43] Muirhead, R. J. (1982). Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. Wiley Series in
Probability and Statistics.
[44] Nagaev, S. V. (1979). Large deviations of sums of independent random variables.
Annals of Probability 7 745-789.
[45] Nazarov, F. (2003). On the maximal perimeter of a convex set in Rn with respect
to a Gaussian measure. In Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis, Lecture Notes
in Mathematics Volume 1807, Springer.
[46] Peng, J., Wang, P., Zhou, N. and Zhu, J. (2009). Partial Correlation Estimation
by Joint Sparse Regression Models. Journal of American Statistical Association 104
735-746.
[47] Portnoy, S. (1986). On the central limit theorem in Rp when p → ∞. Probability
Theory and Related Fields 73 571-583.
[48] Ravikumar, P., Wainwright, M. J., Raskutti, G. and Yu, B. (2008). Highdimensional covariance estimation by minimizing `1 -penalized log-determinant divergence. Electronic Journal of Statistics.
[49] Rothman, A. J., Bickel, P. J., Levina, E. and Zhu, J. (2008). Sparse Permutation
Invariant Covariance Estimation. Electronic Journal of Statistics 2 494-515.
[50] Rudelson, M. and Vershynin, R. (2013). Hanson-Wright inequality and subGaussian concentration. Electronic Communications in Probability 18 1-9.
[51] Serfling, R. J. (2001). Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley,
New York.
[52] Talagrand, M. (1996). New concentration inequalities in product spaces. Invent.
Math 126.
[53] van der Vaart, A. and Wellner, J. (1996). Weak Convergence and Empirical
Processes: With Applications to Statistics. Springer.
[54] Vershynin, R. (2010). Introduction to the non-asymptotic analysis of random matrices. arXiv preprint arXiv:1011.3027.
[55] Yuan, M. (2010). High dimensional inverse covariance matrix estimation via linear
programming. Journal of Machine Learning Research 11 2261-2286.
[56] Yuan, M. and Lin, Y. (2007). Model selection and estimation in the Gaussian graphical model. Biometrika 94 19-35.
[57] Zhang, C.-H. (1999). Sub-Bernoulli functions, moment inequalities and strong laws
for nonnegative and symmterized U-staitstics. Annals of Probability 27 432-453.
[58] Zhang, D. and Wu, W. B. (2015+). Gaussian approximation for high-dimensional
time series. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.07036.
[59] Zhang, X. and Cheng, G. (2014). Bootstrapping high dimensional time series.
arXiv:1406.1037.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
34
CHEN
Supplemental Materials to “Gaussian
approximation for the sup-norm of
high-dimensional matrix-variate U-statistics and
its applications”
Xiaohui Chen
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Let q > 0 and gi := g(Xi ) = E[h(Xi , X0 )|Xi ] − Eh is the Hájek projection
in (4). Write gmk = gmk (X) for m, k = 1, · · · , p. Recall the definitions
Dq = max(E|hmk |q )1/q ,
D̃q = max(E|gmk |q )1/q ,
m,k
m,k
M = max (kh(Xi , Xj )k ∨ kh(Xi , X0j )k).
1≤i<j≤n
We shall use K, K0 , K1 , · · · to denote positive absolute constants, and C, C 0 , C0 , C1 , · · ·
and c, c0 , c0 , c1 , · · · to denote positive finite constants whose values are independent of n and p and may vary at different places. We write a . b if
a ≤ Cb for some constant C, and a b if a . b and b . a.
APPENDIX A: AUXILIARY LEMMAS IN THE PROOF OF SECTION 2
Appendix A contains additional technical lemmas that are used to prove
the main results of this paper.
Recall that u(γ) = ux (γ) ∨ uz (γ), where
2
2
for all m, k, i) ≥ 1 − γ}
(Xi ) ≤ u2 Egmk
ux (γ) = inf{u ≥ 0 : P(gmk
and uz (γ) is similarly defined with gmk (Xi ) replaced by Zi,mk . Here, Zi
follow iid N (0, Γg ).
Lemma A.1 (Moment bounds for sub-exponential kernel). Let K1 > 0
and γ = n−K1 . If (GA.1) holds for all m, k = 1, · · · , p, then we have
D̃2 ≤ D2 ≤ 21/2 ,
D̃3 ≤ D3 ≤ 21/3 Bn1/3 ,
D̃4 ≤ D4 ≤ 21/4 Bn1/2 ,
kM kq ≤ Kq!Bn log(np)
∀q ≥ 1,
2
u(γ) ≤ CBn log (np),
where C > 0 is a constant depending only on C1 in (GA.1).
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
35
Proof of Lemma A.1. The bounds on D̃` and D` for ` = 2, 3, 4, are
obvious under (7). Since khmk (X, X0 )/Bn kψ1 ≤ 1, where k · kψq is the Orlicz
norm for ψq (x) = exp(xq ) − 1 for q ≥ 1 and x ≥ 0, we have by Pisier’s
inequality [53, Lemma 2.2.2] that
!
hmk (Xi , X0j )
hmk (Xi , Xj )
M
≤ K log(np) max max
+
.
m,k i<j
Bn ψ1
Bn
Bn
ψ1
ψ1
Since kM kq ≤ q! kM kψ1 for any q ≥ 1, we get kM kq ≤ Kq!Bn log(np). By
[16, Lemma 2.2], we have
p
u(γ) ≤ C max{M 0 log(1 + n/γ), D̃2 log(np/γ)},
where C > 0 is a constant only depending on C1 in (GA.1) and M 0 satisfies
E[exp(max1≤m,k≤p |gmk |/M 0 )] ≤ 2. By Pisier’s and Jensen’s inequalities, and
using (7), we have
max |gmk |/Bn
m,k
ψ1
≤ K(log p) max kgmk /Bn kψ1 ≤ K log p.
m,k
Therefore, we can take M 0 = KBn log p for a large enough absolute constant
K > 0. Then, we have u(γ) ≤ CBn log2 (np) for γ = n−K1 .
Lemma A.2 (A moment bound for subgaussian observations). Suppose
that Xi are iid mean zero random vectors such that Xim ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ).
If h is the covariance matrix kernel in (2), then we have for all m, k =
1, · · · , p,
E[exp(|hmk |/ν 2 )] ≤ 2,
i.e. khmk kψ1 ≤ ν 2 .
Proof of Lemma A.2. The lemma follows from
|hmk (X1 , X2 )|
1 |X1m − X2m | |X1k − X2k |
E exp
=
E
exp
ν2
2
ν
ν
2
(X1m − X2m )
(X1k − X2k )2
≤ E exp
+
4ν 2
4ν 2
(X1m − X2m )2
≤ max E exp
1≤m≤p
2ν 2
2
2
X1m + X2m
≤ max E exp
1≤m≤p
ν2
2 2
X1m
≤ max E exp
≤ 2,
1≤m≤p
ν2
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
36
CHEN
where we used the elementary inequality |ab| ≤ (a2 + b2 )/2 in the second
step, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the third step, (a − b)2 ≤ 2(a2 + b2 )
in the fourth step, the iid assumption in the fifth step, and the assumption
that Xim ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ) in the last step.
Lemma A.3 (Moment bounds for uniform polynomial kernel).
2 ≥ C and
K1 > 0 and γ = n−K1 . If Egmk
1
(45)
Let q ≥ 4,
max E(|hmk |2+` /Bn` ) ∨ E[(khk/Bn )q ] ≤ 1
`=0,1,2
for all m, k = 1, · · · , p, then we have
D̃2 ≤ D2 ≤ 1,
D̃3 ≤ D3 ≤ Bn1/3 ,
D̃4 ≤ D4 ≤ Bn1/2 ,
kM kq ≤ 2Bn n2/q ,
u(γ) ≤ C max{Bn n
1+K1
q
, log1/2 (np)},
where C > 0 is a constant depending only on C1 .
Proof of Lemma A.3. The bounds on D̃` and D` for ` = 2, 3, 4, are
similar to those in Lemma A.1. By [53, Lemma 2.2.2] and (45), we have
max
i<j
kh(Xi , Xj )k
Bn
≤ n2/q max
i<j
q
Same bound holds for maxi<j kh(Xi , X0j )k.
[16, Lemma 2.2] and the choice γ = n−K1 .
khk
Bn
≤ n2/q .
q
The bound on u(γ) follows from
Lemma A.4 (A moment bound for observations with uniform polynomial
moments). Let q ≥ 8. Suppose that Xi are iid mean zero random vectors
such that k max1≤k≤p |X1k |kq ≤ ν. If h is the covariance matrix kernel in
(2), then we have
E[khk/(2ν 2 )]4 ≤ 1.
Proof of Lemma A.4. The lemma follows from
h
i8/q
E[khk/ν 2 ]4 ≤ E(khk/ν 2 )q/2
h
i8/q
= 2−4 E max |X1m − X2m |q /ν q
m
h
i8/q
−4
q
q
q
≤ 2
2 E(max |X1m | /ν )
≤ 24 .
m
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
37
APPENDIX B: PROOF DETAILS IN SECTION 5
Proof of Theorem 5.1. In the proof, we shall use K1 , K2 , · · · , to denote absolute constants whose values may differ from place to place, and the
indices i < j and (m, k) implicitly run over 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n and 1 ≤ m, k ≤ p.
Let εi , i = 1, · · · , n, be a sequence of iid Rademacher random variables such
that P(εi = ±1) = 1/2 and εi , i = 1, · · · , n, are also independent of Xn1 and
X0 n1 . By the randomization inequality [18, Theorem 3.5.3], we have
X
X
Ek
f (Xi , Xj )k ≤ K1 Ek
εi εj f (Xi , Xj )k.
i<j
i<j
Fix an m, k = 1, · · · , p and let Λm,k be the n × n upper triangular matrix
m,k ) = 0
with diagonal of zeros and Λm,k
ij = fmk (Xi , Xj ) for i < j. Since tr(Λ
and εi ’s are iid sub-Gaussian, by the Hanson-Wright inequality [50, Theorem
1], conditional on Xn1 , we have for all t > 0
t2
t
> m,k
n
P(|ε Λ ε| ≥ t | X1 ) ≤ 2 exp −K2 min
,
,
|Λm,k |2F |Λm,k |2
where ε = (ε1 , · · · , εn )> . Denote V1 = maxm,k |Λm,k |F and V2 = maxm,k |Λm,k |2 .
Let
n p
o
t∗ = max V1 log(p2 )/K2 , V2 log(p2 )/K2 .
By the union bound, we have
Z ∞
E[max |ε> Λm,k ε| | Xn1 ] =
P(max |ε> Λm,k ε| ≥ t | Xn1 ) dt
m,k
m,k
0
Z ∞
K2 t2
K2 t
∗
2
≤ t + 2p
max exp − 2 , exp −
dt.
V2
V1
t∗
Changing variables, we see that
2
Z ∞
Z ∞
K2 t2
V1
s
√
exp − 2
dt ≤
exp −
ds.
√
2
∗
V
2K2
t
4 log p
1
By the tail bound 1 − Φ(x) ≤ φ(x)/x for all x > 0, where Φ(·) and φ(·) are
the cdf and pdf of the standard Gaussian random variable, respectively, it
follows that
Z ∞
K2 t2
V1
2
(46)
2p
dt ≤ √
≤ K2 V1 .
exp − 2
V1
2K2 log p
t∗
Here, we used p ≥ 2. Similarly, we have
Z ∞
2
2p
exp (−K2 t/V2 ) dt ≤ 2V2 /K2 .
t∗
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
38
CHEN
Note that V2 ≤ V1 . Therefore, we have
X
Ek
εi εj f (Xi , Xj )k ≤ K3 t∗ ≤ K3 (log p)E max |Λm,k |F
m,k
i<j
≤ K3 (log p)(E max |Λm,k |2F )1/2 ,
(47)
m,k
where the last step follows from Jensen’s inequality.
Next, we bound the term E[maxm,k |Λm,k |2F ]. Consider the Hoeffding de2 . Let
composition of fmk
2
2
f˜1m,k (x1 ) = Efmk
(x1 , X0 ) − Efmk
and
2
2
2
2
.
(X, x2 ) + Efmk
f˜m,k (x1 , x2 ) = fmk
(x1 , x2 ) − Efmk
(x1 , X0 ) − Efmk
Clearly, E[f˜1m,k (X)] = 0 and E[f˜m,k (X, X0 )] = E[f˜m,k (x1 , X0 )] = E[f˜m,k (X, x2 )] =
0 for all x1 , x2 ∈ Rp ; i.e. f˜1m,k is centered and f˜m,k is a canonical kernel of
U-statistic of order two w.r.t. F . Since
2
2
= f˜m,k (x1 , x2 ) + f˜1m,k (x1 ) + f˜1m,k (x2 ),
(x1 , x2 ) − Efmk
fmk
we have by the triangle inequality
X
X
X
2
2
2
2
)
(Xi , Xj ) − Efmk
E max
(Xi , Xj ) ≤ max
+ E max
(fmk
fmk
Efmk
m,k
m,k
i<j
(48)
i<j
2
+ Ek
≤ n2 max Efmk
m,k
m,k
X
i<j
f˜(Xi , Xj )k + (n − 1)Ek
i<j
n
X
i=1
where f˜ = {f˜m,k }pm,k=1 and f˜1 = {f˜1m,k }pm,k=1 are p × p random matrices.
By the Hoeffding inequality, conditional on Xn1 , we have for all t > 0
!
n
2
X
K
t
4
P(|
εi f˜1m,k (Xi )| ≥ t | Xn1 ) ≤ 2 exp − Pn
.
˜m,k (Xi ))2
(
f
i=1 1
i=1
By the symmetrization inequality [53, Lemma 2.3.1] and the argument for
bounding (46), we get
(49)
n
n
n
h
i1/2
X
X
X
1/2
˜
˜
Ek
f1 (Xi )k ≤ 2Ek
εi f1 (Xi )k ≤ K5 (log p) E max
f˜1m,k (Xi )2
.
i=1
i=1
m,k
i=1
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
f˜1 (Xi )k,
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
39
By the randomization inequality as in the previous argument before Jensen’s
inequality (47), we get
(50)
h
i1/2
X
X
X
.
Ek
f˜(Xi , Xj )k ≤ K1 Ek
εi εj f˜(Xi , Xj )k ≤ K3 (log p)E max
f˜m,k (Xi , Xj )2
i<j
m,k
i<j
i<j
By the triangle and Jensen’s inequalities, we have
h
i1/2
h
i1/2
X
X
4
E max
f˜m,k (Xi , Xj )2
≤ 2E max
fmk
(Xi , Xj )
m,k
m,k
i<j
i<j
n
o1/2
h
i1/2
X
X
2
2 2
+81/2 E max
[E(fmk
(Xi , X0 )|Xn1 )]2
+ 2 max
(Efmk
)
.
m,k
Let I = E[maxm,k
ity, we have
P
i<j
m,k
i<j
i<j
2 (X , X )]. Then by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequalfmk
i
j
h
i1/2 √ √
X
4
E max
fmk
(Xi , Xj )
≤ I EM 2 ,
m,k
i<j
and
o1/2
n
X
2
E max
(Xi , X0 )|Xn1 )]2
[E(fmk
m,k
i<j
i1/2 h
i1/2 o
nh
X
2
2
(Xi , X0j )|Xn1 )
max
(Xi , X0j )|Xn1
≤ E max max E(fmk
E(fmk
i<j
m,k
≤
h
m,k
2
(Xi , X0j )|Xn1 )
E max max E(fmk
m,k
i1/2 h
i<j
√
√
≤
EM 2 4I,
E max
m,k
i<j
X
i1/2
2
(Xi , X0j )|Xn1 )
E(fmk
i<j
where in the last step we used Jensen’s inequalityP
and the decoupling in2 )2 ≤ IEM 2 .
equality [18, Theorem 3.1.1]. In addition, maxm,k i<j (Efmk
Therefore, we obtain from (50) that
X
√ √
f˜(Xi , Xj )k ≤ K6 (log p) I EM 2 .
Ek
i<j
By (48), (49), and (50), we obtain that
n
h
i1/2 o
X m,k
√ √
2
f˜1 (Xi )2
.
I ≤ K7 n2 max Efmk
+(log p) I EM 2 +n(log p)1/2 E max
m,k
m,k
i
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
40
CHEN
The solution of this quadratic inequality for I is given by
(51)
n
h
i1/2 o
X m,k
2
I ≤ K8 (log p)2 (EM 2 )+n2 max Efmk
+n(log p)1/2 E max
f˜1 (Xi )2
.
m,k
m,k
i
By [17, Lemma 9] and Jensen’s inequality,
h
i
n
h
io
X m,k
X m,k
E max
f˜1 (Xi )2 ≤ K9 max E
f˜1 (Xi )2 + (log p)E max max f˜1m,k (Xi )2
m,k
m,k
i
(52)
i
m,k
i
n
h
io
4
4
≤ K9 n max Efmk
(X1 , X2 ) + (log p)E max max fmk
(Xi , X0j )
i<j m,k
m,k
n
o
4
≤ K9 n max Efmk (X1 , X2 ) + (log p)EM 4 .
m,k
Now, combining (47), (51), and (52), we conclude that
X
Ek
f (Xi , Xj )k
i<j
o1/2
n
4 1/2
2
2
1/2
4
2
2
≤ K10 (log p) n max Efmk + (log p) EM + n(log p) [n max Efmk + (log p)EM ]
m,k
m,k
n
o
≤ K10 (log p) nD2 + (log p)kM k2 + n3/4 (log p)1/4 D4 + (n log p)1/2 kM k4 .
Since kM k2 ≤ kM k4 and p ≤ exp(bn), we have (log p)kM k2 ≤ (bn log p)1/2 kM k4 ,
from which (22) follows.
Proof of Corollary 5.2. The Corollary follows from the bounds D2 ≤
D4 ≤ Bn and kM k4 ≤ KBn log(np), where the last inequality comes from
Lemma A.1.
Proof of Corollary 5.3. The Corollary follows from the bounds D2 ≤
D4 ≤ Bn0 and kM k4 ≤ Bn n1/2 , where the last inequality comes from Lemma
A.3.
Proof of Lemma 5.4. Let vP= λ ◦ Fβ . By the mean value theorem and
noticing that πmk (Z) ≥ 0 and pm,k=1 πmk (Z) = 1 for all Z ∈ Rp×p , we
have
|E[v(T ) − v(L)]| = |E[
p
X
Wmk ∂λ(Fβ (ξ))πmk (ξ)]| ≤ K0 ψEkW k,
m,k=1
where ξ is a random matrix on the line segment between T and L. Let
∆v = |E[v(L) − v(Z)]|. Then,
|E[v(T ) − v(Z)]| ≤ ∆v + K0 ψEkW k.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
41
By the smoothing properties of Fβ (·) in (30) and λ(·) in (31), we have
P(T̄0 ≤ t) ≤ P(Fβ (T ) ≤ t + eβ ) ≤ E[λ(Fβ (T ))] = E[v(T )]
≤ E[v(Z)] + (K0 ψEkW k + ∆v )
= E[λ(Fβ (Z))] + (K0 ψEkW k + ∆v )
≤ P(Fβ (Z) ≤ t + eβ + ψ −1 ) + (K0 ψEkW k + ∆v )
≤ P(Z̄0 ≤ t + eβ + ψ −1 ) + (K0 ψEkW k + ∆v ).
By the anti-concentration inequality [16, Lemma 2.1],
P(Z̄0 ≤ t + eβ + ψ −1 ) − P(Z̄0 ≤ t) ≤ C(eβ + ψ −1 )
p
1 ∨ log(pψ),
where C > 0 is a constant depending only on c0 and C0 . Therefore, we get
p
P(T̄0 ≤ t) − P(Z̄0 ≤ t) ≤ C[(ψEkW k + ∆v ) + (eβ + ψ −1 ) 1 ∨ log(pψ)].
Since L involves sums of iid random matrices and Z is Gaussian of the matching first and second moments to L, the bound for ∆v in (33) follows from
Theorem 2.1 and the Step 1 in the proof of Theorem 2.2 in [16]. Similarly,
we can prove the other half inequality.
Proof of Theorem 5.5. In this proof, we shall use a . b to denote
a ≤ Cb for some constant C > 0 depending only on c0 , C0 , and b. Since D̃2
is lower and upper bounded, we may
√ assume that D̃2 = 1. For u > 0, let
1/2
2
ϕ̄(u) = C1 D̃4 /u and β(u) = n /(2 2u). Define
−3/4
ψ1 (u) = min{n1/8 `−3/8
D̃3
n
, `n−1/6 (ϕ̄(u))−1/3 },
−1/2
ψ2 (u) = min{n1/2 `−1/2
kM k4
n
, `n−1/6 (ϕ̄(u))−1/3 },
−1/2
, `n−1/6 (ϕ̄(u))−1/3 },
−1/2
, `n−1/6 (ϕ̄(u))−1/3 },
ψ3 (u) = min{n1/4 `n−1/4 D2
ψ4 (u) = min{n3/8 `n−3/8 D4
and let ψ(u) = min1≤i≤4 ψi (u). Clearly, ψ(u) ≤ n1/8 for u ≥ 0 and ψi (u)
are strictly increasing functions for u ∈ (0, u∗i ), where u∗i balances the corresponding two components in ψi (u) for i = 1, 2, 3, 4. In addition, for u ≥ u∗i we
have ψi (u) = ψi (u∗i ) = maxv≥0 ψi (v), i.e. all the u∗i ’s attain the corresponding maximum values of ψi (·) at the truncation levels. Let u∗ = max1≤i≤4 u∗i .
Our goal is to show that: for any γ ∈ (0, 1) and for some properly chosen
u in Step 1 below, we have
(53)
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−1/2 `3/2
n u + γ.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
42
CHEN
Step 1. Choose a proper value of u.
3/2
To prove (53), we may further assume that n−1/2 `n u ≤ 1 because otherwise it trivially holds. Choose u = u0 ∨ u1 ∨ u2 ∨ u3 ∨ u4 ∨ u(γ), where
1/2
u0 = n3/8 `−5/8
D̃4 ,
n
3/4
u1 = n3/8 `−5/8
D̃3 ,
n
1/2
u2 = `n−1/2 kM k4 ,
1/2
u3 = n1/4 `−3/4
D2 ,
n
1/2
u4 = n1/8 `n−5/8 D4 .
For this chosen u, we then determine the smoothing parameters β := β(u)
and ψ = min1≤i≤4 ψi where ψi := ψi (u). Let β̄i = n1/2 u−1
for i = 1, 2, 3, 4,
i
and β̄ = min1≤i≤4 β̄i . Then,
(β ∨ ψ) ≤ β̄
because β = 8−1/2 n1/2 u−1 ≤ n1/2 min1≤i≤4 u−1
= β̄ and ψi ≤ β̄i for
i
i = 1, 2, 3, 4.
Step 2. Show that (53) holds for our choice of u (and therefore β and ψ).
Then, (34) follows immediately from the substitution of u into (53)
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−1/2 `3/2
n [u0 ∨ u1 ∨ u2 ∨ u3 ∨ u4 ∨ u(γ)] + γ.
The rest of the proof is to show (53). First, note that since ψ ≤ n1/8 ,
p
p
−1/2 3/2
eβ 1 ∨ log(pψ) ≤ K1 β −1 (log p) log(pn) ≤ K1 β −1 `3/2
`n u.
n ≤ K1 n
For the rest of the terms, we divide into two cases.
Case I: u ≥ u∗ . By Lemma 5.4 and Theorem 5.1, we have
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−1/2 β̄ 2 ψ D̃33 + β̄ψ ϕ̄(u) + ψ ϕ̄(u)`n1/2 +γ + n−1/2 `n3/2 u
{z
} | {z } | {z }
|
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
+ ψ −1 `1/2
+ ψ`3/2 n−1 kM k4 + ψ`n n−1/2 D2 + ψ`5/4
n−3/4 D4 ,
{z
} | n {z
| {zn } | n {z
}
} |
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
where we used (β ∨ ψ) ≤ β̄ in terms (i)–(ii) and ψ ≤ n1/8 in term (iv). Next,
we bound the terms (i)–(vii).
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
43
Term (i). We have
n−1/2 β̄ 2 ψ D̃33 ≤(1) n−1/2 β̄12 ψ1 D̃33 =(2) n−1/2 β̄12 ψ1 (u∗1 )D̃33
−3/4 2
=(3) n−1/2 (n1/8 `n5/8 D̃3
3/4
=(4) n−1/8 `n7/8 D̃3
−3/4
) (n1/8 `n−3/8 D̃3
)D̃33
−1/2 3/2
=(5) n−1/2 `3/2
`n u,
n u1 ≤(6) n
where (1) follows from the definitions of ψ and β̄, (2) from u ≥ u∗ ≥ u∗1 ,
(3) from the definition of β̄1 and the truncation property of ψ1 (u∗1 ) =
maxv≥0 ψ1 (v), (4) from the direct calculations, (5) from the definition of
u1 , and (6) from u ≥ u1 .
Term (ii). We have
β̄ψ ϕ̄(u) ≤(1) β̄1 ψ1 (u∗1 )ϕ̄(u∗1 )
−3/4
=(2) (n1/8 `n5/8 D̃3
3/4
=(3) n−1/8 `n7/8 D̃3
−3/4
)(n1/8 `−3/8
D̃3
n
9/4
)(n−3/8 `n5/8 D̃3 )
≤(4) n−1/2 `3/2
n u,
where (1) follows from the definitions of ψ, β̄, ϕ̄(u) is a decreasing function
in u and u ≥ u∗1 , (2) from the definition of β̄1 and the truncation property
of ψ1 (·), (3) from the direct calculations, and (4) from the steps (5) and (6)
in bounding term (i).
1/2
1/2
1/2
Term (iii). Note that ψ ϕ̄(u)`n = β̄ψ ϕ̄(u)`n /β̄. We claim that `n /β̄ ≤
1/2
1. Then, by the calculations in term (ii), we have ψ ϕ̄(u)`n ≤ β̄ψ ϕ̄(u) ≤
3/2
n−1/2 `n u. Now, we verify the claim. Since ψi = ψi (u∗i ) for u ≥ u∗ , it is easy
1/2 u−1 = `−1 β̄ and therefore `1/2 β̄ −1 = `−1/2 ψ −1 .
to check that ψi = `−1
n
n
i
n
n n
i
1/2 −1
−1/2 −1
1/2 −1
3/2
−1/2
By Lemma C.1, we have `n β̄ = `n ψ ≤ `n ψ ≤ n
`n u ≤ 1.
1/2 −1
3/2
−1/2
Term (iv). The bound `n ψ ≤ n
`n u follows from Lemma C.1.
Term (v), (vi), and (vii). Since ψ ≤ ψi for i = 2, 3, 4, we can show by
direct calculations that
−1
3/2 −1
1/2 −1
1/2 −1
ψ`3/2
≤ n−1/2 `n3/2 u,
n n kM k4 ≤ ψ2 `n n kM k4 = `n ψ2 ≤ `n ψ
ψ`n n−1/2 D2 ≤ ψ3 `n n−1/2 D2 = `n1/2 ψ3−1 ≤ `n1/2 ψ −1 ≤ n−1/2 `n3/2 u,
−1
−3/4
−3/4
1/2 −1
ψ`5/4
D4 ≤ ψ4 `5/4
D4 = `1/2
≤ n−1/2 `3/2
n n
n n
n ψ4 ≤ `n ψ
n u
where the last steps of each line follow from Lemma C.1.
Therefore, we conclude that (53) holds when u ≥ u∗ .
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
44
CHEN
Case II: 0 < u < u∗ . By Lemma 5.4 and Theorem 5.1, we have
ρ(T̄0 , Z̄0 ) . n−1/2 β̄ 2 ψ D̃33 + (ψ 2 + ψβ)ϕ̄(u) + ψ ϕ̄(u)`n1/2 +γ + n−1/2 `n3/2 u
|
{z
} |
{z
} | {z }
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
3/2 −1
+ ψ −1 `1/2
n−1/2 D2 + ψ`n5/4 n−3/4 D4 ,
n + ψ`n n kM k4 + ψ`
| n {z
}
| {z }
(iv)
|
{z
(v)
}
|
(vi)
{z
(vii)
}
where we used (β ∨ ψ) ≤ β̄ in terms (i) and ψ ≤ n1/8 in term (iv). Again,
our task is to bound the terms (i)–(vii) in order to achieve (53).
Term (i). We have
3/4
n−1/2 β̄ 2 ψ D̃33 ≤(1) n−1/2 β̄12 ψ1 D̃33 ≤(2) n−1/8 `n7/8 D̃3
≤(3) n−1/2 `n3/2 u,
where (1) follows from the definitions of ψ and β̄, (2) from the definition
−3/8 −3/4
of β̄1 , the truncation property of ψ1 ≤ n1/8 `n D̃3
and steps (3)–(4) of
term (i) in Case I, and (3) from steps (5)–(6) of term (i) in Case I.
Term (ii). We write (ii) = (ii.1)+(ii.2), where (ii.1) = ψ 2 ϕ̄(u) and (ii.2) =
ψβ ϕ̄(u). By the truncation property of ψ(·), we have
(ii.1) ≤ [`−1/3
(ϕ̄(u))−2/3 ]ϕ̄(u) = `n−1/3 (ϕ̄(u))1/3 ,
n
(ii.2) ≤ [`−1/6
(ϕ̄(u))−1/3 ]β ϕ̄(u) = β`−1/6
(ϕ̄(u))2/3 .
n
n
√
−5/8 1/2
Recall that ϕ̄(u) = C D̃42 u−1 , β(u) = (2 2)−1 n1/2 u−1 , and u0 = n3/8 `n D̃4
so that
(54)
ϕ̄(u0 ) = Cn−3/2 `n5/2 u30 ,
β(u0 ) = Cn1/2 u−1
0 .
Since ϕ̄(·) and β(·) are decreasing in u and u ≥ u0 , we get
−1/2 1/2
(ii.1) ≤ `−1/3
(ϕ̄(u0 ))1/3 ≤ Cn−1/2 `1/2
`n u,
n
n u0 ≤ Cn
(ii.2) ≤ β(u0 )`−1/6
(ϕ̄(u0 ))2/3 ≤ Cn−1/2 `n3/2 u0 ≤ Cn−1/2 `n3/2 u.
n
3/2
Therefore, we obtain that (ii) . n−1/2 `n u.
Term (iii). By the same argument as in bounding the term (ii) above, we
have
1/3
2/3
ψ ϕ̄(u)`1/2
≤(1) [`−1/6
(ϕ̄(u))−1/3 ]ϕ̄(u)`1/2
≤(2) `n1/3 (ϕ̄(u0 ))2/3
n
n
n = `n (ϕ̄(u))
≤(3) Cn−1 `2n u20 ≤ Cn−1 `2n u2 = C(n−1/2 `n3/2 u)(n−1/2 `n1/2 u) ≤ Cn−1/2 `3/2
n u.
| {z } | {z }
≤1
3/2
≤n−1/2 `n u
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
45
where (1) follows from the truncation property of ψ(·), (2) from the fact
that ϕ̄(·) is decreasing and u ≥ u0 , (3) from (54), and the rest equalities and
inequalities are obvious.
1/2
3/2
Term (iv). By Lemma C.1, we have `n ψ −1 ≤ Cn1/2 `n u for some constant C > 0 depending only on c0 and C0 .
Term (v), (vi), and (vii). Since ψi (·) is non-decreasing, ψ is no greater
than its value in Case I and these three terms can be handled in the same
way as in Case I.
Therefore, regardless of u ≥ u∗ or 0 < u < u∗ , (53) always holds for any
γ ∈ (0, 1) and the proof is complete.
APPENDIX C: AUXILIARY LEMMAS IN THE PROOF OF SECTION 5
Lemma C.1 (A key bound on ψ −1 ). Let u∗ , u, and ψi (·), i = 1, 2, 3, 4 be
defined in the proof of Theorem 5.5. Let ψi = ψi (u) and ψ = min1≤i≤4 ψi .
Assume that c0 ≤ D̃2 ≤ C0 . Then we have for all u > 0
(55)
−1
`1/2
≤ Cn−1/2 `n3/2 u,
n ψ
where C > 0 is a constant depending only on c0 and C0 . In particular, if
u ≥ u∗ , then we can take C = 1.
Proof of Lemma C.1. We shall use the same notations as in the proof
of Theorem 5.5. We divide the proof of (55) into two cases.
Case I: u ≥ u∗ . In this case, all the ψi (u)’s for i = 1, 2, 3, 4 attain the
corresponding maximum of ψi at the truncation levels; i.e.
−3/4
ψ1 = n1/8 `−3/8
D̃3
n
ψ2 =
ψ3 =
ψ4 =
,
−1/2
n1/2 `−1/2
kM k4 ,
n
−1/2
n1/4 `−1/4
D2 ,
n
−1/2
n3/8 `n−3/8 D4 .
Then (55) follows from the definitions of ui and the direct calculations
3/4
−1
`1/2
= n−1/8 `7/8
n ψ1
n D̃3
−1/2 3/2
= n−1/2 `3/2
`n u,
n u1 ≤ n
1/2
−1
`1/2
= n−1/2 `n kM k4
n ψ2
−1/2 3/2
= n−1/2 `3/2
`n u,
n u2 ≤ n
1/2
= n−1/2 `n3/2 u3 ≤ n−1/2 `n3/2 u,
1/2
= n−1/2 `n3/2 u4 ≤ n−1/2 `n3/2 u.
−1
`1/2
= n−1/4 `3/4
n ψ3
n D2
−1
`1/2
= n−3/8 `7/8
n ψ4
n D4
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
46
CHEN
1/2
Case II: 0 < u < u∗ . In this case, note that `n ψ −1 is equal to
n
o
1/2
1/6
1/3
−1/8 3/8 3/4
−1/2 1/2
−1/4 1/4 1/2
−3/8 3/8 1/2
`1/2
max
`
(
ϕ̄(u))
,
n
`
D̃
,
n
`
kM
k
,
n
`
D
,
n
`
D
.
n
n
n
n
n
n
3
4
2
4
1/2
1/6
We only need to bound `n [`n (ϕ̄(u))1/3 ] since the remaining terms have
the same bounds as in Case I. Since ϕ̄(·) is decreasing in u and u ≥ u0 , we
have
1/3
`2/3
≤ `n2/3 (ϕ̄(u0 ))1/3 .
n (ϕ̄(u))
−5/8
1/2
Recall the definitions ϕ̄(u) = C D̃42 u−1 and u0 = n3/8 `n D̃4 . Then,
5/4
5/2
D̃4 = u20 n−3/4 `n and ϕ̄(u0 ) = C D̃42 u−1
= Cu30 n−3/2 `n . Therefore, we
0
2/3
3/2
3/2
have `n (ϕ̄(u0 ))1/3 = C 1/3 n−1/2 `n u0 ≤ C 1/3 n−1/2 `n u since u ≥ u0 .
Lemma C.2. Let ρ (α) = P({T̄0 ≤ aL̂∗ (α)} {L̄0 ≤ aZ̄0 (α)}), where
0
aZ̄0 (α) = inf{t ∈ R : P(Z̄0 ≤ t) ≥ α} is the α-th quantile of Z̄0 . Assume that
2 ≥ C for all m, k = 1, · · · , p. Suppose that
Egmk
1
P(|T̄0 − L̄0 | > ζ1 ) < ζ2 ,
P(Pe (|L̂∗0
− L̄∗0 | > ζ1 ) > ζ2 ) < ζ2 ,
for some ζ1 , ζ2 ≥ 0. Then, for every α ∈ (0, 1) and v > 0, we have
h
i
ρ (α) ≤ 2 ρ(L̄0 , Z̄0 ) + Cv 1/3 (log p)2/3 + P(∆1 > v) + C 0 ζ1 (log p)1/2 + 5ζ2 ,
where ∆1 is defined in (57) and C, C 0 > 0 are constants only depending on
C1 .
Proof of Lemma C.2. The proof is a modification of [16, Theorem 3.2],
verbatim replacing the anti-concentration inequality of [17, Theorem 2 and 3]
by Nazarov’s inequality [45]. The benefit of using Nazarov’s inequality is that
we can have v 1/3 (log p)2/3 and ζ1 (log p)1/2 , instead of v 1/3 (1 ∨ log(p/v))2/3
and ζ1 (1 ∨ log(p/ζ))1/2 in [16, Theorem 3.2], respectively, where the former
can give the convergence rates in Theorem 3.1 that decay to zero polynomially fast in n without additional logarithm factors.
In the following Lemma C.3–C.8, we shall assume that p ≥ 2.
Lemma C.3 (Bound on E(∆1 ): sub-exponential moment). Assume (7).
Let
log p 1/2
(log p)(log(np))2 2
(56)
$1 (n, p) =
Bn +
Bn .
n
n
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
47
and
(57)
∆1 =
n
1 X
g̃i g̃i> − Γg ,
n
i=1
where g̃i = vech(g(Xi )). Then,
E(∆1 ) ≤ K$1 (n, p)
for some absolute constant K > 0.
Proof of Lemma C.3. Let j, k, m, l = 1, · · · , p be such that j ≥ k and
m ≥ l and write MAX = maxj≥k,m≥l . By [17, Lemma 8],
(
" n
#1
1 )
2
X
2
1
K1
2
2
2
2
(log p) 2 MAX E
+(log p) E max MAXgi,jk
gi,ml
.
E(∆1 ) ≤
gi,jk
gi,ml
i≤n
n
i=1
4
2 g 2 ] = E[max
Note that E[maxi≤n MAXgi,jk
i≤n maxj≥k gi,jk ]. By [53, Lemma
i,ml
2.2.2] and (7),
max max |gi,jk |
i≤n j≥k
ψ1
≤ K2 (log(np)) max max kgi,jk kψ1 ≤ K2 (log(np))Bn .
i≤n j≥k
Therefore, we have
4
4
] ≤ K3 max max |gi,jk |
E[max max gi,jk
i≤n j≥k
i≤n j≥k
≤ K3 (log(np))4 Bn4 .
ψ1
By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and (7), we have for all j ≥ k and m ≥ l
"
E
n
X
#1
"
2
2
2
gi,ml
gi,jk
≤
(E
i=1
n
X
4
gi,jk
)1/2 (E
j≥k
#1
2
4
)1/2
gi,ml
i=1
i=1
≤ max(E
n
X
n
X
4
gi,jk
)1/2 ≤ (2n)1/2 Bn .
i=1
Now, (56) follows.
1/2
Lemma C.4 (Bound on E(∆2 ): sub-exponential kernel).
Let
n
(58)
X
1
[ĝi,mk − gmk (Xi )]2
∆2 = max
n m,k
i=1
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
48
CHEN
and
(59)
$2 (n, p) = Bn
n log3/2 (np)
n1/2
∨
log2 (np) o
.
n
Assume (7). Then
1/2
E(∆2 ) ≤ K$2 (n, p)
for some absolute constant K > 0.
Proof of Lemma C.4. Write MAX = maxm,k maxi≤n . By the definition of ĝi and g(Xi ), we have
(60)
1/2
∆2
≤ max max |ĝi,mk − gmk (Xi )|
m,k i≤n
n
≤
X
1
MAX
hmk (Xi , X0j ) − E[hmk (Xi , X0j )|Xn1 ]
n
j=1
−1
X
n
hmk (X0j , X0l ) − Ehmk .
+
max
m,k
2
1≤j<l≤n
By [17, Lemma 8] conditional on Xn1 , we have
n
h
i
X
E MAX
hmk (Xi , X0j ) − E[hmk (Xi , X0j )|Xn1 ] | Xn1
j=1
n
n
hX
i1/2
1/2
≤ K1 (log(np)) MAX
E h2mk (Xi , X0j ) | Xn1
j=1
h
i1/2 o
+(log(np)) E MAX max h2mk (Xi , X0j ) | Xn1
.
j≤n
By [53, Lemma 2.2.2] and (7), we have
max max |hmk (Xi , X0j )|
m,k
i,j
ψ1
≤ K2 log(np) max max khmk (Xi , X0j )kψ1 ≤ K2 (log(np))Bn .
m,k
i,j
Then, we have by Jensen’s inequality that
h
i1/2
E E MAX max h2mk (Xi , X0j ) | Xn1
≤ 2K2 (log(np))Bn .
j≤n
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
49
By Jensen’s inequality twice and [53, Lemma 2.2.2], we have
n
n
hX
i1/2 o
E MAX
E h2mk (Xi , X0j ) | Xn1
j=1
n h
io1/2
≤ n1/2 E MAX E[h2mk (Xi , X01 ) | Xn1 ]
n h
io1/2
≤ n1/2 E max max h2mk (Xi , X01 )
≤ K3 n1/2 (log(np))Bn .
m,k i≤n
Then
n
i
X
1 h
E MAX
hmk (Xi , X0j ) − E[hmk (Xi , X0j ) | Xn1 ] ≤ K4 $2 (n, p).
n
j=1
Finally, by (28) and (29), the expectation of the second term in the last
inequality of (60) is bounded by K5 Bn {(log(p)/n)1/2 ∨ (log(p)/n)}, which is
on the smaller order of $2 (n, p). The lemma now follows.
Lemma C.5 (Bound on EkW k: sub-exponential kernel).
(61)
$3 (n, p) =
Let
(log p)3/2 (log(np))
log p (log p)5/4 1/2
Bn + 1/2 +
Bn .
n
n
n3/4
Assume (7). If 2 ≤ p ≤ exp(bn) for some absolute constant b > 0, then
EkW k ≤ K(1 ∨ b1/2 )$3 (n, p)
for some absolute constant K > 0.
Proof of Lemma C.5. By Lemma A.1, we have kM kq ≤ Kq!Bn log(np)
1/2
and D2 ≤ 21/2 , D4 ≤ 21/4 Bn . By Theorem 5.1, we have
h log p 3/2
log p log p 5/4
i
EkW k ≤ K(1∨b1/2 )n1/2
Bn log(np)+
+
Bn1/2 ,
n
n
n
from which lemma follows.
Lemma C.6 (Bound on E(∆1 ): uniform polynomial moment).
Assume (45). Let
log p 1/2
log p
Bn + 1−2/q Bn2 .
(62)
$1 (n, p) =
n
n
Let q ≥ 4.
Then,
E(∆1 ) ≤ K$1 (n, p),
where ∆1 is defined in (57) and K > 0 is an absolute constant.
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
50
CHEN
Proof of Lemma C.6. The proof is similar to the argument of Lemma
4 ]. By Jensen’s inC.3 with the difference in bounding E[maxi≤n maxj≥k gi,jk
equality,
max max
i≤n j≥k
|gi,jk |
Bn
≤ max max
i≤n j≥k
4
|gi,jk |
Bn
≤ n1/q max
q
i≤n
gi
Bn
≤ n1/q .
q
Therefore, we have
4
E[max max gi,jk
] ≤ n4/q Bn4 .
i≤n j≥k
1/2
Lemma C.7 (Bound on E(∆2 ): kernel with uniform polynomial moment). Let q ≥ 4 and
"
#
Bn (log(np))1/2
(log(np))1/2
(63)
$2 (n, p) =
1∨
.
n1/2−1/q
n1/2−1/q
Assume (45). Then
1/2
E(∆2 ) ≤ K$2 (n, p),
where ∆2 is defined in (58) and K > 0 is an absolute constant.
Proof of Lemma C.7. The proof is similar to the argument in Lemma
C.4. We only note the differences. First, under (45),
k max max |hmk (Xi , X0j )|kq ≤ n2/q Bn ,
m,k
i,j
which in combination with the conditional Jensen’s inequality imply that
i1/2
h
E E max max h2mk (Xi , X0j ) | Xn1
≤ n2/q Bn .
m,k
i,j
Second, by Jensen’s inequality twice and [53, Lemma 2.2.2], we have
n
n
hX
i1/2 o
E MAX
E h2mk (Xi , X0j ) | Xn1
j=1
n h
io1/2
≤ n1/2 E max max h2mk (Xi , X01 )
m,k i≤n
k max max |hmk (Xi , X01 )|kq
≤ n
1/2
≤ n
1/2+1/q
m,k i≤n
kkhkkq ≤ n1/2+1/q Bn .
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
51
Then
n
i
X
1 h
E MAX
hmk (Xi , X0j ) − E[hmk (Xi , X0j ) | Xn1 ] ≤ K1 $2 (n, p).
n
j=1
By (28) and [16, Lemma 8], we have
hn−1
E
max
m,k
2
≤ K2
n (log p)1/2
n
X
hmk (X0j , X0l ) − Ehmk
i
1≤j<l≤n
max
m,k
n/2
hX
i1/2
Eh2mk (Xi , Xi+n/2 )
i=1
i1/2 o
log p h
E max kh(Xi , Xi+n/2 )k2
+
n
1≤i≤n/2
n log p 1/2 B log p o
n
≤ K3
+ 1−1/q .
n
n
Since the last bound is of smaller order than $2 (n, p), the remaining proof
follows from the argument in Lemma C.4.
Lemma C.8 (Bound on EkW k: kernel with uniform polynomial moment).
Let q ≥ 4 and
(64)
$3 (n, p) =
(log p)3/2
log p (log p)5/4 1/2
B
+
+
Bn .
n
n1−2/q
n1/2
n3/4
Assume (45). If 2 ≤ p ≤ exp(bn) for some absolute constant b > 0, then
EkW k ≤ K(1 ∨ b1/2 )$3 (n, p)
for some absolute constant K > 0.
Proof. By Lemma A.3, we have kM k4 ≤ kM kq ≤ 2n2/q Bn , D2 ≤ 1 and
1/2
D4 ≤ Bn . By Theorem 5.1, we have
EkW k ≤ K(1 ∨ b1/2 )n1/2
h log p 3/2
n
Bn n2/q +
log p
n
+
log p 5/4
n
i
Bn1/2 .
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
52
CHEN
APPENDIX D: ADDITIONAL NUMERICAL COMPARISONS
We present more numerical comparisons of the Gaussian approximation
on the Hájek projection and its wild bootstrap version for the covariance
matrix. We consider two mean-zero distributions from the elliptical family
[43]:
(M1) (sub-exponential moment) The ε-contaminated p-variate elliptical normal distribution with density function
> −1
1−ε
x V x
f (x; ε, ν, V ) =
exp −
p/2
1/2
2
(2π) det(V )
> −1
ε
x V x
(65)
+
;
exp −
p/2
1/2
2
2ν 2
(2πν ) det(V )
(M2) (polynomial moment) The p-variate elliptical t-distribution with degree of freedom ν and density function
−(ν+p)/2
Γ(ν + p)/2
x> V −1 x
(66) f (x; ν, V ) =
1+
.
ν
Γ(ν/2)(νπ)p/2 det(V )1/2
For the positive-definite matrix V , we consider three dependence models:
(D1) strong dependence model with V = 0.9 × 1p 1>
p + 0.1 × Idp , where 1p
is the p × 1 vector of all ones;
(D2) moderate dependence AR(1) model with V = {vmk }pm,k=1 and vmk =
0.7|m−k| ;
(D3) weak dependence AR(1) model with V = {vmk }pm,k=1 and vmk =
0.3|m−k| .
We use ε = 0.2 and ν = 1.5 in (M1) and ν = 10 in (M2). For the chosen
parameters, the two distributions have the same variance scaling for each V ,
while the kurtosis of the sub-exponential case is 0.16 and the polynomial case
is 1/3. We compare the finite sample performance on n = 500 and p = 40
so that there are 820 covariance parameters. In each setup, we compare the
approximation quality of T̄0 using Z̄0 and L̂∗0 . All results are reported over
5000 simulation runs.
First, Figure 3 shows a better approximation than Figure 4 for Z̄0 and L̂∗0 .
This is predicted by our theory in Section 2 and 3. Second, the approximation becomes more accurate as the dependence gets stronger in both Figure
3 and Figure 4. Third, the wild bootstrap has high-quality approximation
for the upper tail probabilities, which is particularly relevant for statistical
applications; see Section 4 below. This occurs even when the Gaussian approximation has deteriorated performance such as in the weakly dependent
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
53
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.0
0.2
0.4
X
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.8
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.0
Bootstrap approximation
0.6
0.2
0.4
Bootstrap approximation
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.6
alpha
0.8
Wild bootstrap
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.6
X
Wild bootstrap
0.0
0.2
0.4
1.0
Wild bootstrap
0.0
0.2
X
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
Z
0.6
0.8
0.0
0.2
0.4
Z
0.6
0.8
0.6
Z
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
Bootstrap approximation
Gaussian approximation
1.0
Gaussian approximation
1.0
Gaussian approximation
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
alpha
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
alpha
Fig 3. Gaussian approximations (top row) by Z̄0 and wild bootstrap approximations (bottom row) by L̂∗0 for the ε-contaminated normal distribution model: left (M1)+(D1), middle
(M1)+(D2), and right (M1)+(D3). Sample size n = 500 and dimension p = 40.
AR(1) models (D2) and (D3). One possible explanation for this phenomenon
can be the numeric instability for simulating the p0 × 1 normal random vectors Zi in the approximation, where p0 = p(p + 1)/2. On the contrary, the
wild bootstrap only requires the simulation of n univariate normal random
variables.
APPENDIX E: TWO ADDITIONAL APPLICATION EXAMPLES
In this section, we provide two more examples for applying the Gaussian
wild bootstrap procedure. We only state results for subgaussian observations. For the uniform polynomial moment case, we can easily obtain similar
results as in Section 4. For a matrix Θ = {θmk }pm,k=1 and a vector θ, we
P
write
max1≤k≤p pm=1 |θmk | is the matrix L1 -norm of Θ and |θ|w =
Pp |Θ|L1w =1/w
( j=1 |θj | ) , w ≥ 1, is the `w -norm of θ, where |θ|∞ = max1≤j≤p |θj | is
the max-norm.
E.1. Estimation of the sparse precision matrix. Precision matrix,
i.e. the inverse of the covariance matrix Ω = Σ−1 , is an important object in
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
54
CHEN
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.0
0.2
0.4
X
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.8
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.0
Bootstrap approximation
0.6
0.2
0.4
Bootstrap approximation
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.6
0.8
Wild bootstrap
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.6
X
Wild bootstrap
0.0
0.2
0.4
1.0
Wild bootstrap
0.0
0.2
X
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
Z
0.6
0.8
0.0
0.2
0.4
Z
0.6
0.8
0.6
Z
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
Bootstrap approximation
Gaussian approximation
1.0
Gaussian approximation
1.0
Gaussian approximation
0.0
0.2
alpha
0.4
0.6
alpha
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
alpha
Fig 4. Gaussian approximations (top row) by Z̄0 and wild bootstrap approximations (bottom row) by L̂∗0 for the elliptic t-distribution model: left (M2)+(D1), middle (M2)+(D2),
and right (M2)+(D3). Sample size n = 500 and dimension p = 40.
high-dimensional statistics because it closely ties to the Gaussian graphical
models and partial correlation graphs [42, 56, 49, 46, 55, 10]. For multivariate
Gaussian observations Xi , zero entries in the precision matrix correspond to
missing edges in the graphical models; i.e. ωmk = 0 means that Xm and Xk
are conditionally independent given the values of all other variables [20, 36].
To avoid the overfitting for graphical models with a large number of nodes,
the sparsity is a widely considered structural assumption. Here, we consider
the estimation of Ω by using the CLIME method [10]
(67)
Ω̂(λ) = argminΘ∈Rp×p |Θ|1
subject to kŜΘ − Idp×p k ≤ λ,
where λP≥ 0 is a tuning parameter to control the sparsity in Ω̂(λ) and
|Θ|1 = pm,k=1 |θmk |. As in the thresholded covariance matrix estimation
case in Section 4.1, the performance of CLIME depends on the selection
of tuning parameter λ. A popular approach is to use the cross-validation
(CV), whose theoretical properties again are unclear in the high-dimensional
setup. Here, we shall apply the Gaussian wild bootstrap to determine λ. Let
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
55
r ∈ [0, 1) and
p
n
o
X
p×p
G̃(r, M, ζp ) = Θ ∈ S+ : |Θ|L1 ≤ M, max
|θmk |r ≤ ζp ,
m≤p
k=1
where Sp×p
is the collection of positive-definite p × p symmetric matrices.
+
Theorem E.1 (Adaptive tuning parameter selection for CLIME: subgaussian observations). Let ν ≥ 1 and Xi be iid mean zero random vectors
such that Xik ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ) for all k = 1, · · · , p. Suppose that there exist
constants Ci > 0, i = 1, · · · , 4, such that {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥ C1 , kX1k k4 ≤ C2 ,
kX1k k6 ≤ C3 ν 1/3 and kX1k k8 ≤ C4 ν 1/2 for all j, k = 1, · · · , p. Assume
that Ω ∈ G̃(r, M, ζp ) and and ν 4 log7 (np) ≤ C1 n1−K for some K ∈ (0, 1).
Choose λ∗ = M aL̂∗ (1 − α), where the bootstrap samples are generated with
0
the covariance matrix kernel in (2). Then, we have with probability at least
1 − α − Cn−K/8 for some constant C > 0 depending only on C1 , · · · , C5 such
that
kΩ̂(λ∗ ) − Ωk2 ≤ Cr ζp M 2−2r aL̂∗ (1 − α)1−r ,
(68)
0
(69)
−1
p
|Ω̂(λ∗ ) −
Ω|2F
≤ 4Cr ζp M
4−2r
aL̂∗ (1 − α)2−r ,
0
where Cr = 23−2r (1 + 21−r + 31−r ). In addition, we have E[aL̂∗ (1 − α)] ≤
0
C 0 (log(p)/n)1/2 for some constant C 0 > 0 depending only on α and C1 , · · · , C5 .
In particular, E[λ∗ ] ≤ C 0 M (log(p)/n)1/2 .
Now, we compare Theorem E.1 with [10, Theorem 1(a) and 4(a)]. Let η ∈
(0, 1/4) and K, τ ∈ (0, ∞) be bounded constants. Assuming that log(p)/n ≤
η, E[exp(tXij2 )] ≤ K for all |t| ≤ η and i = 1, · · · , n; j = 1, · · · , p, and
Ω ∈ G̃(r, M, ζp ), [10] showed that with probability at least 1 − 4p−τ
0
kΩ̂(λ∆ ) − Ωk2 ≤ C∆
ζp M 2−2r (log(p)/n)(1−r)/2 ,
p−1 |Ω̂(λ∆ ) − Ω|2F
0
≤ 4C∆
ζp M 4−2r (log(p)/n)1−r/2 ,
0 =
where λ∆ = C∆ M (log(p)/n)1/2 , C∆ = 2η −2 (2 + τ + η −1 e2 K 2 )2 , and C∆
1−r
2
−2
Cr C∆ . If Xij ∼ subgaussian(ν ), then η ≤ ν for large enough K. There0 & ν 8(1−r) , both diverging to infinity as ν 2 → ∞ (i.e.
fore, C∆ & ν 8 and C∆
η → 0). Therefore, λ∗ = oP (λ∆ ) and the convergence rates in (68) and (69)
are much sharper than those obtained in [10, Theorem 1(a) and 4(a)].
On the other hand, the turning parameter λ∗ requires the knowledge of
M and thus the estimator Ω̂(λ∗ ) is not fully data-dependent. In contrast
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
56
CHEN
with the thresholded covariance matrix estimation problem in Section 4.1,
the fundamental difficulty here for estimating the precision matrix is that
there is no sample analog of Ω when p > n and M can be viewed as a
stability parameter in the sparse inversion of the matrix Ŝ. That is, the
larger M , the more difficult to estimate Ω = Σ−1 ; in particular for CLIME,
the rates (68) and (69) become slower. In addition, |Ω|L1 plays a similar role
in the graphical Lasso model for estimating the sparse precision matrix [48].
The same comments apply to the problem of estimating the sparse linear
functionals in Section E.2.
E.2. Estimation of the sparse linear functionals. Consider estimation of the linear functional θ = Σ−1 b, where b is a fixed known p × 1
vector and Σ = Var(Xi ). Functionals of such form are related to the solution
of the linear equality constrained quadratic program
(70)
minimizew∈Rp×p w> Σw
subject to b> w = 1,
which arises naturally in Markowitz portfolio selection, linear discriminant
analysis, array signal processing, best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE),
and optimal linear prediction for univariate time series [39, 38, 27, 41]. For
example, in Markowitz portfolio selection, the portfolio risk Var(X>
i w) is
minimized subject to the constraint that the expected mean return E(X>
i w)
is fixed at certain level. The solution of (70) w∗ = (b> Σ−1 b)−1 Σ−1 b is
proportional to θ and the optimal value of (70) is (b> Σ−1 b)−1 . A naive
approach to estimate θ has two steps: first construct an invertible estimator
Σ̂ of Σ and second estimate θ by Σ̂−1 b. This two-step estimator may not
be consistent for θ in high-dimensions even though Σ̂ is a spectral norm
consistent (and typically regularized) estimator of Σ because in the worst
case |θ̂ − θ| = |Σ̂−1 b − Σ−1 b| ≤ kΣ̂−1 − Σ−1 k2 · |b| does not converge if
|b| → ∞ at faster rate than kΣ̂−1 − Σ−1 k2 → 0. However, if θ has some
structural assumptions such as sparsity, then we can directly estimate θ
without the intermediate step for estimating Σ̂ or Σ̂−1 . Sparsity in θ is often
a plausible assumption in real applications. For instance, the sparse portfolio
has been considered in [8] to obtain the stable portfolio optimization and
to facilitate the transaction cost for a large number of assets. When θ is
sparse, the following Dantzig-selector type problem has been proposed in
[15] to estimate θ
(71)
θ̂(λ) = argminw∈Rp×p |w|1
subject to |Ŝw − b|∞ ≤ λ,
where λ ≥ 0 is a tuning parameter to control the sparsity in θ̂(λ). The optimization problem (71) can be solved by linear programming and thus there
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
57
are computationally efficient algorithms for obtaining θ̂(λ). The intuition of
(71) is that since Σθ = b, we should expect that Ŝ θ̂ ≈ b for a reasonably
good estimator θ̂. Under the sparsity assumption on θ and suitable moment
conditions on Xi , [15] obtained the rate of convergence for θ̂(λ). However,
a remaining issue for using (71) on real data is to properly select the tuning
parameter λ. Different from the thresholded covariance matrix estimation
where the sparsity is assumed in Σ, here we do not require this structure in
the linear functional estimation. Instead, we impose the sparsity assumption
directly on θ. Let r ∈ [0, 1) and
p
n
o
X
p
G (r, ζp ) = w ∈ R :
|wj |r ≤ ζp .
0
j=1
Here, ζp controls the sparsity level of the elements in G 0 (r, ζp ). Without
assuming any structure on Σ, we can allow stronger dependence in Σ and
therefore the Gaussian wild bootstrap approximation may perform better in
this case.
Theorem E.2 (Adaptive tuning parameter selection in linear functional
estimation: subgaussian observations). Let ν ≥ 1 and Xi be iid mean zero
random vectors such that Xik ∼ subgaussian(ν 2 ) for all k = 1, · · · , p. Suppose that there exist constants Ci > 0, i = 1, · · · , 4, such that {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥
C1 , kX1k k4 ≤ C2 , kX1k k6 ≤ C3 ν 1/3 and kX1k k8 ≤ C4 ν 1/2 for all j, k =
1, · · · , p. Assume that θ ∈ G 0 (r, ζp ) and ν 4 log7 (np) ≤ C5 n1−K for some
K ∈ (0, 1). Let |θ|1 ≤ M and choose λ∗ = M aL̂∗ (1 − α), where the bootstrap
0
samples are generated with the covariance matrix kernel in (2). Then we
have for all w ∈ [1, ∞]
(72)
1
|θ̂(λ∗ ) − θ|w ≤ (2 · 6 w · 5
1−r
w
1
r
r
)ζpw (M |Σ−1 |L1 )1− w aL̂∗ (1 − α)1− w
0
with probability at least 1 − α − Cn−K/8 for some constant C > 0 depending
only on C1 , · · · , C5 . In addition, we have
(73)
E[λ∗ ] ≤ C 0 M (log(p)/n)1/2 ,
where C 0 > 0 is a constant depending only on α and C1 , · · · , C5 .
p
The tuning parameter λ∆ = C∆ M log(p)/n is selected in [15, Theorem
II.1], which is non-adaptive and the constant C∆ > 0 depends on the underlying data distribution F through ν 2 . In particular, C∆ → ∞ as ν 2 → ∞.
Theorem E.2 shows that the bootstrap tuning parameter selection strategy
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
58
CHEN
is less conservative in view of (73) and the rate (72) can be much tighter
than θ̂(λ∆ ) when ν 2 → ∞. However, as in Section E.1, the turning parameter λ∗ here requires the knowledge of M and thus the estimator θ̂(λ∗ ) is
not fully data-dependent. But this is due to the fundamental difficulty for
the lack of the sample analog of θ in this problem.
E.3. Proof of Theorem E.1 and E.2.
Lemma E.3.
Then, we have
Suppose that Ω ∈ G̃(r, M, ζp ) and let λ ≥ |Ω|L1 kŜ − Σk.
|Ω̂(λ) − Ω|∞ ≤ 4|Ω|L1 λ,
kΩ̂(λ) − Ωk2 ≤ C1 ζp λ1−r ,
p−1 |Ω̂(λ) − Ω|2F
≤ C2 ζp λ2−r ,
where C1 ≤ 2(1 + 21−r + 31−r )(4|Ω|L1 )1−r and C2 ≤ 4|Ω|L1 C1 .
Proof of Lemma E.3. See [10, Theorem 6].
Lemma E.4. Let λ ≥ |θ|1 kŜ − Σk. Then, θ satisfies |Ŝθ − b|∞ ≤ λ. For
the Dantzig-selector estimator θ̂(λ) in (71), we have
1
1
|θ̂(λ) − θ|w ≤ [6D(5λ|Σ−1 |L1 )] w (2λ|Σ−1 |L1 )1− w ,
P
where D(u) = pj=1 (|θj | ∧ u), u ≥ 0, is the smallness measure of θ.
Proof of Lemma E.4. See [15, Lemma V.6].
Proof of Theorem E.1. Let λ = |Ω|L1 kŜ − Σk. By the subgaussian
assumption and Lemma A.2, we have (44) for some large enough constant
C > 0 depending only on C2 , C3 , C4 so that (44) holds. Since {Γg }(j,k),(j,k) ≥
C1 for all j, k = 1, · · · , p and ν 4 log7 (np) ≤ C5 n1−K , by Theorem 3.1, we
have kŜ − Σk ≤ aL̂∗ (1 − α) with probability at least 1 − α − Cn−K/8 , where
0
C > 0 is a constant depending only on Ci , i = 1, · · · , 5. Since |Ω|L1 ≤ M
for Ω ∈ G̃(r, M, ζp ), P(λ ≤ λ∗ ) ≥ 1 − α − Cn−K/8 . Then, (68) and (69)
follow from Lemma E.3 applied to the event {λ ≤ λ∗ }. The bounds for
E[aL̂∗ (1 − α)] and E[λ∗ ] are the same as those in Theorem 4.1.
0
Proof of Theorem E.2. For θ ∈ G 0 (r, C0 , ζp ), we have D(u) ≤ 2u1−r ζp .
Let λ = |θ|1 kŜ − Σk. Following the proof of Theorem E.1, we have P(λ ≤
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
59
λ∗ ) ≥ 1 − α − Cn−K/8 . By Lemma E.4, we have with probability at least
1 − α − Cn−K/8
1
1
|θ̂(λ∗ ) − θ|w ≤ [6D(5λ∗ |Σ−1 |L1 )] w (2λ∗ |Σ−1 |L1 )1− w
1
≤ (2 · 6 w · 5
1−r
w
1
r
1− w
1− r
)ζpw |Σ−1 |L1 w λ∗
,
which is (72). The bound for E[λ∗ ] is immediate.
APPENDIX F: HIGHER-ORDER MOMENT INEQUALITIES OF THE
DECOUPLED AND CANONICAL V-STATISTICS
Let X0 n1 be an independent copy of Xn1 following the distribution F . Here,
we present some higher-order moment and concentration inequalities for
X
V0 =
f (Xi , X0j ),
1≤i,j≤n
which is the unnormalized version of the decoupled V-statistics. Formally,
U-statistics is
equivalent to V-statistics by removing the diPasymptotically
n
0
agonal sum i=1 f (Xi , Xi ). So here we also refer V 0 as the decoupled Ustatistics with the kernel f . We consider the canonical kernel f . Tail probability inequalities for kV 0 k is closely related to the moment bounds of higherorders. Let B be a separable Banach space, (B ∗ , k · k∗ ) the dual space of
(B, k · k), and B1∗ the unit ball in B ∗ . Let In = {1, · · · , n} and ι = (i, j) ∈ In2
be the collection of index pairs implicitly runningP
over i, j ∈ In . For notation
0
0
simplicity, we write f(ι) = f (Xi , Xj ) and V = ι f(ι) . For I ⊂ I2 , we let
ιI be the |I|-dimensional vector such that it is the restriction of ι to the
coordinates in I (e.g. if ι = (2, 5), then ι{1} = 2). For J ∈ I2 , we denote EJ
(j)
as the expectation taken w.r.t. the random variables Xi for all j ∈ J and
i ∈ In . By convention, E∅ X = X. Following [1], for J ⊂ I ⊂ I2 and I 6= ∅,
we define
n X
Y
∗
(X(j)
f(ι) I,J = EI\J sup EJ
φ(f(ι) )
gι(j)
ιj ) : φ ∈ B1 ,
j
ιI
(j)
gi
(74)
j∈J
: Rp → R, j ∈ J, i ∈ In , and E
X
o
(j)
(j)
|gi (Xi )|2 ≤ 1 .
i
If I = ∅, then by convention
f(ι)
f(ι)
and
I2 ,J
f(ι)
∅,∅
= kf(ι) k. As remarked by [1],
is a deterministic quantity and it is in fact a norm. For I 6= I2 ,
(k)
(1)
is random variable only depending on {Xιk }k∈I c where Xi
I,J
(2)
Xj =
= Xi
X0j .
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
60
CHEN
Lemma F.1 (Higher-order moment inequality for unbounded canonical
kernel). Let h be a canonical kernel of order two w.r.t. F . Then, there
exists an absolute constant K > 0 such that we have for all q ≥ 2
n
X
X
f(ι) k)q
f(ι) kq ≤ K q (Ek
Ek
ι
ι
+q
q/2
h
q
I2 ,{1}
f(ι)
+
q
I2 ,{2}
f(ι)
+ [E2
X
X
X
X
(E1 k
f(ι) k)2 ]q/2 + [E1
(E2 k
f(ι) k)2 ]q/2
j
i
i
j
q/2
X
q/2
X
q/2 i
X
Ekf(ι) k2
+ E2 max
E1 kf(ι) k2
+ E1 max
E2 kf(ι) k2
+
j
ι
+q q
h
i
i
q
{1},∅
q
I2 ,I2
q
{2},∅
j
i
+ E1 max f(ι)
+ E2 max f(ι)
f(ι)
i
j
o
i
h
q
q
3q/2
E2 max f(ι) {1},{1} + E1 max f(ι) {2},{2} + q 2q E max kf(ι) kq .
+q
ι
i
j
(75)
For bounded kernels, (75) leads to an exponential concentration inequality; c.f. Corollary F.2 below. Lemma F.1 can be viewed as the matrix-variate
version of the moments and exponential inequalities for the real-valued Ustatistics in [24]. On the other hand, it can also be viewed as an extension
of the upper tail part of Talagrand’s inequality for maxima of empirical processes of iid random variables to U-statistics [52, 40]. Indeed, Lemma F.1
recovers [24, Theorem 3.2] for real-valued kernels. For f taking values in R,
it was established in [24, Theorem 3.2] that there exists an absolute constant
K > 0 such that for all q ≥ 2
n
X
X
2 q/2
E|
f(ι) |q ≤ K q q q/2 (
Ef(ι)
) + q q kf(ι) kqL2 →L2
ι
+q
3q/2
ι
h
E1 max(E2
X
i
j
2 q/2
f(ι)
)
+ E2 max(E1
j
X
o
i
2 q/2
+ q 2q E max |f(ι) |q ,
f(ι)
)
ι
i
(76)
where
n X
o
X (1) (1)
X (2) (2)
(1)
(1) (2)
(2)
kf(ι) kL2 →L2 = sup E
f(ι) gi (Xi )gj (Xj ) : E
|gi (Xi )|2 ≤ 1, E
|gj (Xj )|2 ≤ 1 .
ι
i
j
To compare (76) and (75), we first compute the terms with coefficient q 3q/2
in (75). By (86), we have
X
q/2
q
2
f(ι)
,
E2 max f(ι) {1},{1} ≤ E2 max E1
j
j
i
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
61
which is handled by the q 3q/2 term in (76). Similar bound holds for E1 maxi f(ι)
q
.
{2},{2}
Next, we consider the q q terms. Observe that f(ι) I ,I = kf(ι) kL2 →L2 . In
2 2
addition, by (87) and Jensen’s inequality, we have
q
X
q/2
X
q
2
f(ι) | ≤ E2 max E1
f(ι)
,
E2 max f(ι) {1},∅ = E2 max E1 |
j
j
j
i
i
which is again smaller than q 3q/2 terms in (76). For the q q/2 terms, by
(83), the degeneracy of h, Jensen’s inequality, and the orthogonality of f(ι)
conditional on Xn1 , we have
(77) n
o
X
X
X
X
X
2
2
.
(E2 k
f(ι) k)2 ≤ E1
E2 (
f(ι) )2 =
Ef(ι)
f(ι) I ,{1} , E1
max
2
i
j
i
ι
j
Remark 5. On the contrary, unlike the real-valued kernels where the
higher-order moment bounds and exponential inequalities involving only the
L2 and L∞ norms, the matrix-valued U-statistics involves more subtle balance among the “mixed norms” of h in (75). Those quantities are expressed
in terms of the maxima of empirical processes and it thus can be much
smaller than a straightforward extension of (76). This remark also applies
to Corollary F.2.
F.1. Exponential inequality for bounded kernels. As an immediate consequence of Lemma F.1, we have the following concentration inequality, which is equivalent to (75) up to constants.
Corollary F.2 (Exponential inequality for bounded canonical kernel).
Let f be a bounded canonical kernel of order two w.r.t. F . Then, there exist
absolute constants K, M, M 0 > 0 such that for all t > 0
(78)
(
" 2 1 #)
X
X
t
t 3
t 2
t 2
0
P(k
f(ι) k ≥ KEk
f(ι) k+t) ≤ M exp −M min
,
,
,
,
D
C
B
A
ι
ι
where
A = kf(ι) k∞ ,
B=
f(ι)
{1},{1} ∞
+
f(ι)
{2},{2} ∞
,
C = kf(ι) kI2 ,I2 +
f(ι) {1},∅
+
f(ι) {2},∅
,
∞
∞
h
i1
1
2
D = n 2 nEkf(ι) k2 + E1 kf(ι) k2 ∞ + E2 kf(ι) k2 ∞ + f(ι) I ,{1}
2
X
X
X
X
1
2 21
+ f(ι) I ,{2} + [E1
(E2 k
f(ι) k) ] + [E2
(E1 k
f(ι) k)2 ] 2 .
2
i
j
j
i
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
62
CHEN
Proof of Corollary F.2 is based on a standard argument combining the
Chebyshev and higher-order moment inequalities (Theorem F.1); see e.g.
[24]. Corollary F.2 is a Bernstein-type inequality for the high-dimensional
matrix-valued U-statistics. Exact computations of A, B, C, D are quite complicated. Below, we shall give a less sharp (with uniform bounds) but userfriendly version of Corollary F.2.
Corollary F.3. If f be a bounded canonical kernel of order two w.r.t.
F and kf k∞ ≤ C0 , then there exist constants K, M > 0 and a constant
M 0 > 0 depending only C0 such that for all t > 0
(79)
"
!#
X
X
t2 t t2/3 1/2
0
P(k
f(ι) k ≥ KEk
f(ι) k + t) ≤ M exp −M min
, ,
,t
.
3 n n1/3
n
ι
ι
Remark 6.
1. Except for a worse factor on t2 /n3 , the exponential
inequality (79) is the same as [24, Corollary 3.4], which considered the
real-valued kernels and the corresponding term is t2 /n2 . The loss of
order n is due to the lack of orthogonality for the sup-norm. Since the
Banach space (Rp×p , k · k) is of type 1 and nothing more [37, Chapter
9.2] , this term in (79) cannot be improved.
2. In view of the undecoupled
results of [18, 19], inequalities (75), (78)
P
and (79) also hold for 1≤i,j≤n f (Xi , Xj ).
F.2. Proof of results in Section F.
P
Proof of Lemma F.1. Note that f(ι) I ,∅ = Ek ι f(ι) k. By [1, The2
orem 1] with order two, there exists an absolute constant K1 > 0 such that
for all q ≥ 2, we have
n
h
i
X
X
q
q
Ek
f(ι) kq ≤ K1q (Ek
f(ι) k)q + q q/2 f(ι) I ,{1} + f(ι) I ,{2}
2
2
ι
ι
+q q
h
q
I2 ,I2
f(ι)
+
X
E2 f(ι)
q
{1},∅
j
+q 3q/2
hX
+q 2q E
X
E2 f(ι)
j
(80)
+
X
E1 f(ι)
q
{2},∅
i
i
q
{1},{1}
+
X
E1 f(ι)
q
{2},{2}
i
i
o
kf(ι) kq .
ι
First, we replace the summation in the last term on the RHS of (80) by
the maximum over ι, with proper modifications of the argument from [24]
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
63
in the Banach space setting. Applying Lemma F.4 with s = q/2 and α = 4
conditional on Xn1 , we have
X
(81)
q 2q
Ekf(ι) kq
ι
h
q 4 i X n q 2q
o
X
q
≤ 22q+1 1 +
E1
E2 max kf(ι) kq + (
E2 kf(ι) k2 ) 2 .
j
2
2
i
j
By a second application of Lemma F.4 for E1 with s = q/2 and α = 0, we
can bound the second term on the RHS of (81) by
h
i
X
X
X
X
q
q
q
Ekf(ι) k2 ) 2 .
E1 (
E2 kf(ι) k2 ) 2 ≤ 2 E1 max(
E2 kf(ι) k2 ) 2 + (
i
i
j
ι
j
For the first term on the RHS of (81), by Fubini’s theorem to interchange
the order of E1 and E2 , we proceed as
q 2q X
E2
E1 max kf(ι) kq
j
2
i
h
q 4 i n q 2q
o
X
q
≤(∗) 2 1 +
E2
E1 max kf(ι) kq + (
E1 max kf(ι) k2 ) 2
ι
j
2
2
i
h
q 4 in q 2q
hXX
i q o
2
≤ 2 1+
E max kf(ι) kq + E2
,
E1 kf(ι) k2
ι
2
2
j
i
where in step (∗) a third application of Lemma F.4 is used with s = q/2 and
α = 4. By Lemma F.5 with s = q/2 and by Lemma F.4 with s = q/2 and
α = 0 both on E2 , we have
hXX
i q
2
E2
E1 kf(ι) k2
j
i
h q q X
2
q
≤ K2
E2
X
E1 kf(ι) k2
q
2
+
X
Ekf(ι) k2
q i
2
2
ι
j
i
q q h
X
q/2 X
q i
2
q
2
2 2
≤ K3
E2 max
E1 kf(ι) k
+
Ekf(ι) k
.
j
2
ι
i
Now, substituting those estimates into (81), it follows that
n
X
q X
q
(82)
Ekf(ι) k2 ) 2
q 2q
Ekh(ι) kq ≤ K4q q 2q E max kf(ι) kq + q 2 (
ι
i<j
h
+q q/2 E2 max
j
X
i
E1 kf(ι) k2
q/2
ι
+ E1 max
i
X
E2 kf(ι) k2
q/2 io
.
j
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
64
CHEN
Next, by Lemma F.6, we can replace the q 3q/2
P
q
E2 f(ι) {1},{1} in (80) by
P
q
3q/2
q
E2 maxj f(ι) {1},{1} , with an additional term ( ι Ekf(ι) k2 )q/2 that
have already been subsumed
in the previous steps. Similarly, by Lemma
P
q
q
F.7, we may replace q q j E2 f(ι) {1},∅ in (80) by q q E2 maxj f(ι) {1},∅ +
P
P
[E2 j (E1 k i f(ι) k)2 ]q/2 and then move the second term to the q q/2 terms.
Now, (75) follows from (80) and (82).
j
Proof of Corollary F.3. By (86) and (87), elementary calculations
show that A = O(1), B = O(n1/2 ), C = O(n) for bounded kernels. For D,
it is easy to see that
h XX
i1/2
f(ι) I ,{1} = E2 sup E1
(
φ(f(ι) ))2
(83)
2
φ∈B1∗
i
j
i1/2 h X
i1/2
X X
X
≤ E2 E1
k
f(ι) k2
≤ E1
E2 k
f(ι) k2
.
h
i
j
i
j
Therefore, D = O(n3/2 ) and (79) follows from (78).
Lemma F.4. Let s ≥ 1 and α ≥ 0. Let ξi be nonnegative independent
random variables. Then, we have
X
X
(84)
sαs
Eξis ≤ 2(1 + sα ) max sαs E max ξis , (
Eξi )s .
i
i
i
Proof of Lemma F.4. See equation (2.6) in [24].
Lemma F.5. Let s ≥ 1 and ξi be nonnegative independent random variables. Then, we have
X
X
X
(85)
E(
ξi )s ≤ (2e)s max ess−1
Eξis , es (
Eξi )s .
i
i
i
Proof of Lemma F.5. See [35].
The following Lemma F.6 and F.7 hold for both non-degenerate and
canonical V-statistics with the kernel f .
Lemma F.6. Let q ≥ 2 and f(ι) {1},{1} be defined in (74). Then, there
exists an absolute constant K > 0 such that
h
i
X
X
q
q
q 3q/2
E2 f(ι) {1},{1} ≤ K q q 3q/2 E2 max f(ι) {1},{1} +(
Ekf(ι) k2 )q/2 .
j
j
ι
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL U-STATISTICS
65
Proof of Lemma F.6. By duality, we have
n X
o
X (1) (1)
(1)
(1)
f(ι) {1},{1} = sup E1
φ(f(ι) )gi (Xi ) : φ ∈ B1∗ , E
|gi (Xi )|2 ≤ 1
i
i
n X
1/2
o
= sup E1
φ2 (f(ι) )
: φ ∈ B1∗ .
(86)
i
2
Therefore, { f(ι) {1},{1} }nj=1 is a sequence of nonnegative independent random variables. By Lemma F.4 with α = 3 and s = q/2, we have
X
q
q 3q/2
E2 f(ι) {1},{1}
j
h
q 3 ih q 3q/2
E2 max f(ι)
≤ 21+3q/2 1 +
j
2
2
By (86),
f(ι)
2
{1},{1}
≤
2
i E1 kf(ι) k
P
q
{1},{1}
+(
X
E2 f(ι)
2
)q/2
{1},{1}
j
and the lemma follows.
Lemma F.7. Let q ≥ 2 and f(ι) {1},∅ be defined in (74). Then, there
exists an absolute constant K > 0 such that
X
h
q/2 i
X
X
q
q
(E1 k
.
f(ι) k)2
qq
E2 f(ι) {1},∅ ≤ K q q q E2 max f(ι) {1},∅ + E2
j
j
j
i
Proof of Lemma F.7. As in the proof of Lemma F.6, by duality we
have
nX
o
X
(87)
f(ι) {1},∅ = E1 sup
φ(f(ι) ) : φ ∈ B1∗ = E1 k
f(ι) k.
i
i
By Lemma F.4 with α = 2 and s = q/2, we have
h
X
X
q
q
qq
E2 f(ι) {1},∅ ≤ K q q q E2 max f(ι) {1},∅ + (
E2 f(ι)
j
j
2
)q/2
{1},∅
i
.
j
Xiaohui Chen
Department of Statistics
725 S. Wright Street
Champaign, IL 61820
E-mail: [email protected]
imsart-aos ver. 2014/01/08 file: ustat-June-24-2016.tex date: October 4, 2016
i
.
| 10math.ST
|
arXiv:1711.03239v2 [cs.PL] 17 Nov 2017
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
Osbert Bastani
Rahul Sharma
Stanford University
USA
[email protected]
Microsoft Research
India
[email protected]
Alex Aiken
Percy Liang
Stanford University
USA
[email protected]
Stanford University
USA
[email protected]
Abstract
static analysis [4, 11, 23, 25, 31, 38]. In particular, tools have
been designed to infer properties of missing code, including taint flow properties [13], function models [18, 19], and
callback control flow [20]. While these approaches are incomplete, and may not infer sound specifications, current static
analyses used in production already rely on user-provided
specifications [14], and as we will show, tools that automatically infer specifications can outperform human analysts.
We propose an algorithm based on dynamic analysis that
infers library specifications summarizing points-to effects
relevant to a flow-insensitive points-to analysis. Our algorithm works by iteratively guessing a candidate specification,
and then checking whether this candidate is “correct”. More
precisely, we want to only infer specifications that must be
included in any sound set of specifications, thus avoiding
spurious specifications that cause false positives. There are
two constraints that make our problem substantially more
challenging than previously studied settings:
When analyzing programs, large libraries pose significant
challenges to static points-to analysis. A popular solution
is to have a human analyst provide points-to specifications
that summarize relevant behaviors of library code, which
can substantially improve precision and furthermore handle
missing code such as native code. We propose Atlas, a tool
that automatically infers points-to specifications. Atlas synthesizes unit tests that exercise the library code, and then
infers points-to specifications based on observations from
these executions. Atlas automatically infers specifications
for the Java standard library, and produces better results for
a client static information flow analysis on a benchmark of
46 Android apps compared to using existing handwritten
specifications.
1
Introduction
When analyzing programs, dependencies on large libraries
can significantly reduce the effectiveness of static analysis,
since libraries frequently contain (i) native code that cannot
be analyzed, (ii) use of challenging language features such
as reflection, and (iii) deep call hierarchies that reduce precision. For example, the implementation of the Vector class
in OpenJDK 1.7 uses multiple levels of call indirection and
calls the native function System.arrayCopy.
A standard workaround is to use specifications that summarize the relevant behaviors of library functions [14, 47].
For a one-time cost of writing specifications for the library,
the precision and soundness of the static analysis can improve dramatically when analyzing any client code. However,
many libraries contain a large number of functions, making
writing specifications for the entire library expensive [8, 47].
Additionally, manually written specifications are often error
prone [18]. Finally, every time the library code is updated,
the specifications must be updated.
To address these issues, approaches have been proposed
for automatically inferring specifications for library code,
both based on dynamic analysis [3, 7, 29, 34, 35] and on
• Points-to effects cannot be summarized for a library
function in isolation, e.g., in Figure 1, set, get, and
clone all refer to the mutual field f. Furthermore, f is
not from the library implementation; it is a ghost field
that must be invented by the inference algorithm. Thus,
a guessed candidate must simultaneously summarize
the points-to effects of set, get, and clone.
• In practice it is often difficult or impossible to instrument library code (e.g., native code); we assume only
blackbox access.
To address these challenges, we introduce path specifications to describe points-to effects of library code. Each
path specification summarizes a single points-to effect of a
combination of functions. An example is:
For two calls box.set(x) and box.get(), the
return value of get may alias x.
Path specifications have two desirable properties: (i) we can
check if a candidate path specification is correct using inputoutput examples, and (ii) correctness of path specifications is
independent. These two properties imply that we can infer
path specifications incrementally. In particular, we propose
an active learning algorithm that infers specifications by
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
2017. ACM ISBN 978-x-xxxx-xxxx-x/YY/MM. . . $15.00
https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn
1
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
boolean test() {
Object in = new Object(); // o_in
Box box = new Box(); // o_box
box.set(in);
Object out = box.get();
return in == out; }
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
class Box { // library
Object f;
void set(Object ob) { f = ob; }
Object get() { return f; }
Box clone() {
Box b = new Box(); // o_clone
b.f = f;
return b; }}
Figure 1. An example of a program using the Box class in the library (right), and the implementation of the library functions
set, get, and clone in the Box class.
actively identifying promising candidate specifications, and
then automatically checking their correctness.
We implement our algorithm in a tool called Atlas,1
which infers path specifications for functions in Java libraries.
In particular, we evaluate Atlas by using it to infer specifications for the Java standard library, including the Collections
API, which contains many functions that exhibit complex
points-to effects. We evaluate Atlas using a standard static
explicit information flow client [6, 7, 16, 17] on a benchmark
of 46 Android apps. Our client uses handwritten points-to
specifications for the Java standard library [8, 47]. Over the
course of two years, we have handwritten a number of pointsto specifications tailored to finding information flows in apps
we analyzed, including those in our benchmark. However,
these specifications remain incomplete.
We use Atlas to infer specifications for classes in six
commonly used packages in the Java standard library. Atlas inferred more than 5× as many specifications as the
existing, handwritten ones. We show that using the specifications inferred by Atlas instead of the handwritten ones
improves the recall of our information flow client by 52%.
Moreover, we manually wrote ground truth specifications
for the most frequently used subset of classes in the Collections API, totalling 1,731 lines of code, and show that Atlas
inferred the correct specifications (i.e., identical to handwritten ground truth specifications) for 97% of these functions.
Finally, we show that on average, using specifications more
than halves the number of false positive points-to edges
compared to directly analyzing the library implementation—
in particular, the library implementation contains deep call
hierarchies, which our points-to analysis is insufficiently
context-sensitive to handle. Our contributions are:
• We introduce path specifications, and prove that they
are sufficiently expressive to precisely model the library code when using a standard flow-insensitive
points-to analysis.
• We formulate the problem of inferring path specifications as a language inference problem and design a
novel specification inference algorithm.
• We implement our approach in Atlas, and use it to
infer a large number of useful specifications for the
1 Atlas
Java standard library. In particular, we show that our
specification inference tool can automatically replicate
and even improve the results of our existing static
information flow client.
2
Overview
Consider the program test shown in Figure 1. We assume
that the static analysis resolves aliasing using Andersen’s
analysis [5], a context- and flow-insensitive points-to analysis; our approach also applies to cloning-based context- and
object-sensitive extensions [43]. To determine that variables
in and out may be aliased, the points-to analysis has to reason about the heap effects of the set and get methods in
the Box class. The analyst can write specifications for library
functions class that summarize their heap effects with respect to the semantics of the points-to analysis. For example,
consider the Stack class in the Java library: its implementation extends Vector, which is challenging to analyze due to
deep call hierarchies and native code. The following are the
specifications for the Stack class, implemented as code fragments that overapproximate the heap effects of the methods:
class Stack {
Object f;
void push(Object ob) { f = ob; }
Object pop() { return f; }}
In contrast to the implementation, the specifications for
Stack are very simple and easy to analyze. In fact, these
specifications are not only sound but also precise, since we
are considering a flow-insensitive points-to analysis that
collapses arrays into a single field.
A typical approach is to write specifications lazily [8, 47]—
the analyst examines the program being analyzed, identifies
the library functions most relevant to the static analysis,
and writes specifications for them. The effort put in writing
specifications helps reduce the labor required to discharge
false positives.2 The analyst can trade off between manual
effort and soundness by expending more effort as needed to
increase the completeness of the library specifications.
Atlas helps bootstrap the specification writing process
by automatically inferring points-to specifications. In accordance with the goal of reducing false positives, Atlas
2 In
contrast to the recurring cost of debugging false positives, the cost of
implementing specifications is amortized over many programs.
stands for AcTive Learning of Alias Specifications.
2
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Testing specifications. Path specifications satisfy two key
requirements. The first requirement is that we can check
the precision of a single path specification. For example, for
the specification s box , consider the program test shown in
Figure 1. This unit test satisfies three properties:
prioritizes the precision of the inferred specifications by
employing a two-phase approach. In the first phase, Atlas
infers specifications guaranteed to be precise. In particular,
each inferred specification s comes with a witness, which
intuitively is a unit test that proves the precision of s by exhibiting the heap effects specified by s. In the second phase,
Atlas inductively generalizes the specifications inferred in
the first phase, devising a large number of checks to minimize
the possibility of imprecision.
• It satisfies the assumptions of s box , since thisset and
thisget are aliased.
• It does not induce any other relations between the variables at the interface of the Box class (i.e., ob, thisset ,
i, thisget , and r get ).
• It returns the consequent of s box , i.e., whether ob and
r get point to the same object.
Specification search space. The main challenge in inferring points-to specifications is to formulate the search space
of candidate specifications. Naïvely searching over the space
of code fragments is ineffective because specifications are
highly interdependent, i.e., the specification of a library function is dependent on the specifications of other functions.
For example, the specifications for each of the methods in
the Box class all refer to the shared field f. Thus, to infer
precise specifications, the naïve algorithm would have to
guess a code fragment for every the functions in the library
(or at least in a class) before it can check for precision; the
likelihood that it could make a correct guess is tiny.
Our key insight is that while specifications cannot be
broken at function boundaries, we can decompose them in a
different way. In particular, we propose path specifications,
which are independent units of points-to effects. Intuitively,
a path specification is a dataflow path an object might take
through library code. An example of a path specification is
s box = ob d thisset → thisget d r get .
Since test returns true, any sound set of specifications must
include s box , so s box is precise. We refer to such a unit test as
a witness for the path specification. In summary, long as we
can find a witness for a candidate path specification s, then
we can guarantee that s is precise. One caveat is that even if
test returns false, s box may still be precise.
Therefore, to check if a candidate path specification s is
precise, our algorithm can synthesize a unit test P similar
to test and execute it. If P returns true, then our algorithm
concludes that s is precise; otherwise, it (conservatively) concludes that s is imprecise. Note that s may be precise even if P
returns false; this possibility is unavoidable since executions
are underapproximations. We use heuristics to ensure that
our algorithm rarely concludes that precise specifications
are imprecise. We describe our unit test synthesis algorithm
in detail in Section 5.4.
The second requirement of path specifications that they
are independent, i.e., given a set of path specifications for
which each specification has a witness, then the set as a
whole is precise in the sense that it is a subset of any sound set
of path specifications. In other words, we can use a potential
witness to check the precision of a path specification in
isolation. Thus, our specification inference algorithm can
focus on inferring individual path specifications.
(1)
This path specification roughly has the following semantics:
• Suppose that an object o enters the library code as the
parameter ob of set; then, it is associated with the
receiver thisset of the set method (the edge ob d
thisset ).
• Suppose that in the client program, thisset is aliased
with thisget (the edge thisset → thisget ); then, o
enters the get method.
• Then, o exits the library as the return value r get of get.
Specification inference. Our specification inference algorithm uses two inputs:
In particular, the dashed edges ob d thisset and thisget d
r get represent the effects of library code, and the solid edge
thisset → thisget represents an assumption about the
effects of client code. Then, the path specification says that,
if the points-to analysis determines that thisget and thisset
are aliased, then ob is transfered to r get , which intuitively
means that ob is indirectly assigned to r get . More precisely,
the semantics of s box is the following logical formula:
Alias
Transfer
(thisset −−−→ thisget ) ⇒ (ob −−−−−−→ r get ).
• Library interface: The type signature of each function in the library.
• Blackbox access: The ability to execute a library function on a chosen input and obtain the corresponding
output.
In the first phase (described in Section 5.2), Atlas randomly
guesses a candidate path specification s, synthesizes a potential witness for s, and retains s if this unit test returns true.
This process is repeated a large number of times to obtain a
large but finite set of precise path specifications.
In general, to soundly model library code, an infinite number of path specifications may be required. For example, the
path specifications required to soundly model set, get, and
(2)
A
Here, an edge x −
→ y says that program variables x and y
satisfy a binary relation A. We describe path specifications
in detail in Section 4.
3
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
y ←x
(assign)
(allocation)
Assign
(store)
Store[f ]
o = (x ← X ())
Transfer → ε | Transfer Assign | Transfer Store[f ] Alias Load[f ]
New
o −−−→ o
x −−−−−→ y
y .f ← x
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
(load)
y ← x .f
Load[f ]
Transfer → ε | Assign Transfer | Load[f ] Alias Store[f ] Transfer
σ
(backwards)
x −→ y
Alias → Transfer New New Transfer
σ
y −→ x
x −−−−−−→ y
y ← m(x )
y ← m(x )
(call parameter)
(call return)
Assign
Assign
x −−−−−→ pm
rm −−−−−→ y
x −−−−−−→ y
FlowsTo → New Transfer
Figure 3. Productions for the context-free grammar C pt . The
start symbol of C pt is FlowsTo.
Figure 2. Rules for constructing a graph G encoding the
relevant semantics of program statements.
3
clone are
ob d thisset ( → thisclone d r clone )∗
Background on Points-To Analysis
We consider programs with assignments y ← x (where
x, y ∈ V are variables), allocations x ← X () (where X ∈ C
is a type), stores y.f ← x and loads y ← x .f (where f ∈ F
is a field), and calls to library functions y ← m(x) (where
m ∈ M is a library function). For simplicity, we assume that
each library function m has a single parameter pm and a
return value rm . An abstract object o ∈ O is an allocation
statement o = (x ← X ()). A points-to edge is a pair x ,→ o ∈
V × O. A static points-to analysis computes points-to edges
Π ⊆ V × O. Our results are for Andersen’s analysis, a flowinsensitive points-to analysis [5], but generalize to objectand context-sensitive extensions based on cloning [43]. We
describe the formulation of Andersen’s analysis as a contextfree language reachability problem [21, 22, 32, 40, 41].
(3)
→ thisget d r get .
These specifications say that if we call set, then call clone
n times in sequence, and finally call get (all with the specified aliasing between receivers and return values), then the
parameter ob of set is transfered to the return value of get.
Thus, in the second phase (described in Section 5.3), we
inductively generalize the set S of path specifications in the
first phase to a possibly infinite set. We leverage the idea
that a path specification is simply a sequence of variables,
∗
in particular, s ∈ Vpath
where Vpath are the variables in the
library interface. Thus, a set of path specifications is a formal
language over the alphabet Vpath . As a consequence, we can
frame the inductive generalization problem as a language
inference problem: given (i) the finite set of positive examples
from phase one, and (ii) an oracle we can query to determine
whether a given path specification s is precise (though this
oracle is noisy, i.e., it may return false even if s is precise),
∗ .
the goal is to infer a (possibly infinite) language S ⊆ Vpath
We devise an active language learning algorithm to solve
this problem. Our algorithm proposes candidate inductive
generalizations of S, and then checks the precision of these
candidates using a large number of synthesized unit tests.
Unlike phase one, we may introduce imprecision even if
all the unit tests pass; we show empirically that precision
is maintained. Finally, our algorithm infers a regular set of
path specifications. In theory, no regular set may suffice
to model the library code and more expressive language
inference techniques might be required [10]. But we find
that, in practice, regular sets are sufficient (see Section 7.3).
In our example, suppose that phase one infers
Graph representation. First, our static analysis constructs
a labeled graph G representing the program semantics. The
vertices of G are V ∪ O. The edge labels are
Σpt = {Assign, New, Store, Load, Assign, New, Load, Store}
that encode the semantics of program statements. The rules
for constructing G are in Figure 2. For example, the edges
extracted for the program test in Figure 1 are the solid edges
in Figure 4.
Transitive closure. Second, our static analysis computes
e of G according to the context-free
the transitive closure G
α
grammar C pt in Figure 3. A path y 99K x in G is a sequence
of edges
σ1
σ2
σk
x −−→ v 1 −−→ ... −−→ y
e contains (i) the edges
such that α = σ1 ...σk ∈ Σ∗pt . Then, G
α
σ
x−
→ y in G, and (ii) if there is a path x 99K y in G such that
A
∗
A⇒
= α (where A is a nonterminal of C pt ), the edge x −
→ y.
e using dynamic programming; see [26].
We can compute G
The first production in Figure 3 constructs the transfer
ob d thisset → thisclone d r clone
→ thisclone d r clone → thisget d r get .
Transfer
relation x −−−−−−→ y, which says that x may be “indirectly
assigned” to y. The second production constructs the “backwards” transfer relation. The third production constructs
Then, phase two would inductively generalize it to (3). Finally,
our tool automatically converts these path specifications to
the equivalent code fragment specifications shown in Figure 1 (right). These code fragment specifications can be used
in place of (or in the absence of) library implementations
while analyzing a client.
Alias
the alias relation x −−−→ y, which says that x may alias y.
The fourth production computes the points-to relation, i.e.,
FlowsTo
e
x ,→ o whenever o −−−−−−→ x ∈ G.
4
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
FlowsTo
FlowsTo
New
o in
Transfer
in
Assign
Store[f]
o box
Transfer
thisset
Assign
New
Transfer
in
Assign
o box
ob
r get
Transfer
New Transfer
Assign
box
Load[f]
thisset
thisget
out
Assign
Transfer
Assign
Transfer
ob
o in
out
Assign
r get
New Transfer
Assign
box
thisget
Alias
Alias
Alias
Transfer
(thisset −−−−→ thisget ) ⇒ (ob −−−−−−→ r get )
e computed by the static analysis with the library code, and the right-hand side
Figure 4. The left-hand side shows the graph G
e
shows G computed with path specifications (the relevant path specification is shown below the graph). The solid edges are the
e when
graph G extracted from the program test shown in Figure 1. In addition, the dashed edges are a few of the edges in G
computing the transitive closure. We omit backward edges (i.e., with labels A) for clarity. Vertices and edges corresponding to
library code are highlighted in red.
4
where zi , w i ∈ Vmi for library function mi ∈ M. We require
that w i and zi+1 are not both return values, and that w k is a
return value. For clarity, we typically use the syntax
Path Specifications
Suppose that our static analysis could analyze the library
implementation, and that while computing the transitive
e contains a path
closure, G
β1
A1
z 1 d w 1 → z 2 d ... d w k −1 → zk d w k .
βk
Ak −1
Semantics. Given path specification (4), for each i ∈ [k],
define the nonterminal Ai in the grammar C pt to be
z 1 99K w 1 −−→ ... −−−−→ zk 99K w k .
Here, z 1 , w 1 , ..., zk , w k ∈ Vpath , where Vpath contains the
parameters and return values of library functions, β 1 , ..., βk ∈
Σ∗pt , A1 , ..., Ak−1 ∈ are nonterminals in C pt , and
Transfer if w i = rmi and zi+1 = pmi +1
Ai = Alias
if w i = pmi and zi+1 = pmi +1
Transfer if w i = pm and zi+1 = rm .
i
i +1
∗
A⇒
= β 1A1 ...βk −1Ak−1 βk .
Also, define the nonterminal A by
(
Transfer if z 1 = pm1
A=
Alias
if z 1 = rm1 .
A
e
Then, our static analysis would add edge z 1 −
→ w k to G
as well. Path specifications ensure that the static analysis
computes these edges when the library code is unavailable.
In particular, as above, a path specification says that if
β1
Then, the path specification corresponds to adding a rule
!
k
−1
Û
Ai
A
e ⇒ (z 1 −
e
w i −−→ zi+1 ∈ G
→ w k ∈ G)
βk
A1
e
z 1 99K w 1 −−→ z 2 , ..., zk 99K w k ∈ G,
A
e as well.
then the static analysis must add z 1 −
→ w k to G
For example, while analyzing test in Figure 1 with the
library code on the right available, the analysis sees the path
Store[f]
Alias
(4)
i=1
to the static points-to analysis. The rule also adds the backA
e but we omit it for clarity. We refer
wards edge w k −
→ z 1 to G,
to the antecedent of this rule as the premise of the path specification, and the consequent of this rule as the conclusion of
the path specification.
Continuing our example, the path specification s box shown
in (1) has the semantics
Load[f]
ob −−−−−−→ thisset −−−→ thisget −−−−−→ r get .
∗
Since Transfer ⇒
= Store[f] Transfer Load[f], the analysis
Transfer
adds edge ob −−−−−−→ r get . As we describe below, the path
specification s box shown in (1) ensures that this edge is added
e when the library code is unavailable.
to G
Alias
Transfer
(thisset −−−→ thisget ) ⇒ (ob −−−−−−→ r get ).
Alias
Syntax. Let Vprog be the variables in the program (i.e., excluding variables in the library), let Vm = {pm , rm } be the
parameter and
Ð return value of library function m ∈ M, and
let Vpath = m ∈M Vm be the visible variables (i.e., variables
at the library interface). A path specification is a sequence
This rule says that if the static analysis computes thisset −−−→
Transfer
e then it must add ob −−
e For exthisget ∈ G,
−−−−→ r get to G.
ample, this rule is applied in Figure 4 (right) to compute
Transfer
ob −−−−−−→ r get . The middle column of Figure 5 shows examples of candidate path specifications for the library code
shown in the first column.
∗
z 1w 1z 2w 2 ...zk w k ∈ Vpath
,
5
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Code Fragment Specifications
void set(Object ob) { f = ob; }
Object get() { return f; }
void set(Object ob) { f = ob; }
Object clone() { return f; }
void set(Object ob) { f = ob; }
Object get() { return f; }
Box clone() {
Box b = new Box(); // ~o_clone
b.f = f;
return b; }}
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
Candidate Path Specifications
Synthesized Unit Test
ob d thisset → thisget d r get
boolean test() {
Object in = new Object(); // o_in
Box box = new Box(); // o_box
box.set(in);
Object out = box.get();
return in == out; }
✓
ob d thisset → thisclone d r clone
boolean test() {
Object in = new Object(); // o_in
Box box = new Box(); // o_box
box.set(in);
Object out = box.clone();
return in == out; }
✗
ob d thisset ( → thisclone d r clone )∗
→ thisget d r get
boolean test0() {
Object in = new Object(); // o_in
Box box0 = new Box(); // o_box
box0.set(in);
Object out = box0.get();
return in == out; }
boolean test1() {
Object in = new Object(); // o_in
Box box0 = new Box(); // o_box
box0.set(in);
Box box1 = box0.clone();
Object out = box1.get();
return in == out; }
boolean test2() {
Object in = new Object(); // o_in
Box box0 = new Box(); // o_box
box0.set(in);
Box box1 = box0.clone();
Box box2 = box1.clone();
Object out = box2.get();
return in == out; }
...
✓
Figure 5. Examples of hypothesized library implementations (left column), an equivalent set of path specifications (middle
column), and the synthesized test cases to check the precision of these specifications (right column), with a check mark ✓
(indicating that the tests pass) or a cross mark ✗ (indicating that the tests fail).
e∗ (P) denote the true set of relations for a
Precision. Let G
program P (i.e., relations that hold dynamically for some
execution of P); note that because the library code is omitted from analysis, we only include relations between proe∗ (P). Then, given path specifications S,
gram variables in G
e
let G(P, S) denote the points-to edges computed using S for
e+ (P, S) = G(P,
e S) \ G
e∗ (P) be the false positives, and
P, let G
e− (P, S) = G
e∗ (P) \ G(P,
e S) be the false negatives.
let G
e− (P, S) = ∅. We say S and
Specification set S is sound if G
S ′ are equivalent (written S ≡ S ′) if for very program P,
e S) = G(P,
e S ′). Finally, S is precise if for every sound
G(P,
′
′
S , S ∪ S ≡ S ′. In other words, using S computes no false
positive points-to edges compared to any sound set S ′. We
say a single path specification s is precise if {s} is precise.
We have the following result, which follows by induction:
particular, a program P is a potential witness for a candidate
path specification s if P returns true only if s is precise. If
P is a potential witness for s, and upon execution, P in fact
returns true, then we say P is a witness for s. The last column
of Figure 5 shows potential witnesses for the candidate path
specification in the middle column; a green check indicates
the potential witness returns true (we say P passes), and a
red check indicates it returns false or raises an exception (we
say P fails).
Note that P may return false even if s is precise. This property is inevitable since executions are underapproximations;
we show empirically that if s is precise, then typically the
potential witness synthesized by our algorithm passes.
Soundly and precisely modeling library code. It is not
obvious that path specifications are sufficiently expressive
to precisely model library code. In this section, we show that
path specifications are in fact sufficiently expressive to do
so in the case of Andersen’s analysis (and its cloning-based
context- and object-sensitive extensions). More precisely, for
Theorem 4.1. For any set S of path specifications, if each
s ∈ S is precise, then S is precise.
Witnesses. Our algorithm needs to synthesize unit tests that
check whether a candidate path specification s is precise. In
6
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
Library
Interface M
(Input)
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Unit Test
Synthesis (§5.4) for
Noisy Oracle O (§5.1)
Learned
Automaton
M̂ (§5.3)
Sampled Positive
Examples S 0 (§5.2)
Generated Code
Fragments C (§A)
5
Specification Inference Algorithm
In this section, we describe our algorithm for inferring path
specifications. Our system is summarized in Figure 6, which
also shows the section where each component is described
in detail.
5.1
Overview
∗ be the set of all path specLet the target language S ∗ ⊆ Vpath
ifications that are precise. By Theorem 4.1, S ∗ is precise. The
goal of our algorithm is to infer a set of path specifications
that approximates S ∗ as closely as possible.
Figure 6. An overview of our specification inference system.
The section describing each component is in parentheses.
Inputs. Recall that our algorithm is given two inputs: (i)
the library interface, and (ii) blackbox access to the library
functions. We use these two inputs to construct the noisy
oracle and positive examples as describe below.
any implementation of the library, there exists a (possibly
infinite) set of path specifications such that the points-to sets
computed using path specifications are both sound and at
least as precise as analyzing the library implementation:
Noisy oracle. Given a path specification s, the noisy oracle
∗
O : Vpath
→ {0, 1} (i) always returns 0 if s is imprecise, and
(ii) ideally returns 1 if s is precise (but may return 0). This
oracle is implemented by synthesizing a potential witness
P for s and returning the result of executing P. We describe
how we synthesize a witness for s in Section 5.4.
e be the points-to sets computed with
Theorem 4.2. Let G(P)
e S) is
the library code. Then, there exists S such that G(P,
e S) ⊆ G(P).
e
sound and G(P,
We give a proof in Appendix C. Note that the set S of path
specifications may be infinite. This infinite blowup is unavoidable since we want the ability to test the precision of an
individual path specification. In particular, the library implementation may exhibit effects that require infinitely many
unit tests to check precision (e.g., the path specifications
shown on the third row of Figure 5).
Positive examples. Phase one of our algorithm constructs
a set of positive examples: our algorithm randomly samples
∗ , and then uses O to
candidate path specifications s ∼ Vpath
determine whether each s is precise. More precisely, given
∗ } of random samples, it constructs
a set S = {s ∼ Vpath
positive examples S 0 = {s ∈ S | O(s) = 1}. We describe how
∗
we sample s ∼ Vpath
in Section 5.2.
Regular sets of path specifications. Since the library implementation may correspond to an infinite set of path specifications, we need a mechanism for describing such sets. In
∗ ,
particular, since a path specification is a sequence s ∈ Vpath
we can think of a set S of path specifications as a formal
∗
language S ⊆ Vpath
over the alphabet Vpath . Then, we can
express an infinite set of path specifications using standard
representations such as regular expressions or context-free
grammars.
We make the empirical observation that the set of path
specifications corresponding to the library implementation
is a regular language. There is no particular reason that
this fact should be true, but it holds for all the Java library
functions we have examined so far. For example, consider
the code fragment shown in the first column of the third row
of Figure 5. This specification corresonds to the set of path
specifications shown as a regular expression in the middle
column of the same line (tokens in the regular expression
are highlighted in blue for clarity).
Language inference problem. Phase two of our algorithm
inductively generalizes S 0 to a regular set of path specifications. We formulate this inductive generalization problem
as follows:
Definition 5.1. The language inference problem is to, given
the noisy oracle O and the positive examples S 0 ⊆ S ∗ , infer
a language Sˆ that approximates S ∗ as closely as possible.
In Section 5.3, we describe our algorithm for solving this
problem. Our algorithm outputs a regular language Sˆ =
L(M̂), where M̂ is a finite state automaton—e.g., given
S 0 = {ob thisset thisclone r clone thisget r get },
our language inference algorithm returns an automaton encoding the regular language
ob thisset (thisclone r clone )∗ thisget r get .
5.2
Sampling Positive Examples
∗
We sample a path specification s ∈ Vpath
by building it one
variable at a time, starting from s = ε (where ε denotes the
empty string). At each step, we ensure that s satisfies the path
specification constraints, i.e., (i) zi and w i are parameters or
return values of the same library function, (ii) w i and zi+1
Static analysis with path specifications. To perform static
analysis with regular sets of path specifications, we convert
the path specifications into equivalent code fragments and
then analyze the client alongwith the code fragments. We
describe our algorithm for doing so in Appendix A.
7
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
Our algorithm initializes M̂ to be the FSA representing
the finite language S 0 . In particular, it initializes M̂ to be
the prefix tree acceptor [30], which is the FSA where the
underlying transition graph is the prefix tree of S 0 , the start
state is the root of this prefix tree, and the accept states are
the leaves of this prefix tree.
Then, our algorithm iteratively considers merging pairs
of states of M̂. More precisely, given two states p, q ∈ Q
(without loss of generality, assume q , q init ), Merge(M̂, p, q)
is the FSA obtained by (i) replacing transitions
are not both return values, and (iii) the last variable w k is a
return value. In particular, given current sequence s, the set
T (s) ⊆ Vpath ∪ {ϕ} of choices for the next variable (where
ϕ indicates to terminate and return s) is:
• If s = z 1w 1z 2 ...zi , then the choices for w i are T (s) =
{pm , rm }, where zi ∈ {pm , rm }.
• If s = z 1w 1z 2 ...zi w i , and w i is a parameter, then the
choices for zi+1 are T (s) = Vpath .
• If s = z 1w 1z 2 ...zi w i , and w i is a return value, then the
choices for zi+1 are
T (s) = {z ∈ Vpath | z is a parameter} ∪ {ϕ}.
σ
σ
σ
(r −
→ q) becomes (r −
→ p),
At each step, our algorithm samples x ∼ T (s), and either
constructs s ′ = sx and continues if x , ϕ or returns s if
x = ϕ. We consider two sampling strategies.
σ
(q −
→ r ) becomes (p −
→ r ),
(ii) adding p to Q fin if q ∈ Q fin , and (iii) removing q from Q.
Our algorithm makes a single pass over all the states Q.
We describe how a single step proceeds: let q be the state
being processed in the current step, let Q 0 be the states that
have been processed so far but not removed from Q, and let
M̂ be the current FSA. For each p ∈ Q 0 , our algorithm checks
whether merging q and p overgeneralizes the language, and
if not, greedily performs the merge. More precisely, for each
p ∈ Q 0 , our algorithm constructs
Random sampling. We choose x ∼ T (s) uniformly at random at every step.
Monte Carlo tree search. We can exploit the fact that certain choices x ∈ T (s) are much more likely to yield a precise
path specification than others. To do so, note that our search
space is structured as a tree, where each vertex corresponds
∗ , the root corresponds to the prefix ε, edges
to a prefix in Vpath
are defined by T , and leaves correspond to candidate path
specifications.
We can sample x ∼ T (s) using Monte Carlo tree search
(MCTS) [12], a search algorithm that learns over time which
choices are more likely to succeed. In particular, MCTS keeps
∗
track of a score Q(s, x) for every visited s ∈ Vpath
and every
x ∈ T (s). Then, the choices are sampled according to the
distribution
Õ
′
1
Pr[x | s] = e Q (s,x ) where Z =
e Q (s,x ) .
Z
′
M diff = Merge(M̂, q, p) \ M̂,
Whenever a candidate s = x 1 ...x k is found, we increase the
score Q(x 1 ...x i , x i+1 ) (for each 0 ≤ i < k) if s is a positive
example (O(s) = 1) and decrease it otherwise (O(s) = 0):
which represents the set of strings that are added to L(M̂)
if q and p are merged. Then, for each s ∈ M diff up to some
maximum length N (we take N = 8), our algorithm queries
O(s). If all queries pass (i.e., O(s) = 1), then our algorithm
greedily accepts the merge, i.e., M̂ ← Merge(M̂, q, p) and
continues to the next q ∈ Q. Otherwise, it considers merging
q with the next p ∈ Q 0 . Finally, if q is not merged with any
state p ∈ Q 0 , then our algorithm does not modify M̂ and
adds q to Q 0 . Once it has completed a pass over all states in
Q, our algorithm returns M̂.
For example, suppose our language learning algorithm is
given a single positive example
Q(x 1 ...x i , x i+1 ) ← (1 − α)Q(x 1 ...x i , x i+1 ) + α O(s).
ob thisset thisclone r clone thisget r get .
x ∈ T(s)
We choose the learning rate α = 1/2.
5.3
Then, our algorithm constructs the finite state automaton
Language Inference Algorithm
ob
r
this
this
r get
thisget
clone
clone
q init −−→ q 1 −−−−−set
−→ q 2 −−−−−−−−→ q 3 −−−−−→ q 4 −−−−−−→ q 5 −−−→ q fin .
Our language inference algorithm is based on RPNI [30],
modified to leverage access to the noisy oracle. In particular, whereas RPNI takes as input a set of negative examples,
we use the oracle to generate them on-the-fly. Our algorithm learns a regular language Sˆ = L(M̂) represented by
the (nondeterministic) finite state automaton (FSA) M̂ =
(Q, Vpath , δ, q init , Q fin ), where Q is the set of states, δ : Q ×
Vpath → 2Q is the transition function, q init ∈ Q is the start
state, and Q fin ⊆ Q are the accept states. If there is a single accept state, we denote it by q fin . We denote transitions
σ
q ∈ δ (p, σ ) by p −
→ q.
Our algorithm fails to merge q init , q 1 , q 2 , or q 3 with any
previous states. It then tries to merge q 4 with each state
{q init , q 1 , q 2 , q 3 }; the first two merges fail, but merging q 4
with q 2 produces
q init
ob
q1
thisset
q2
r clone
thisclone
q3
8
thisget
q4
r get
q fin .
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
input
ob d thisset → thisclone → r clone
→ thisget → r get
analysis to compute relation e for P. Therefore, if P witnesses
s, then s is guaranteed to be precise.
skeleton
??.add(??);
?? = ??.clone();
?? = ??.get(??);
fill holes
list.add(in);
List listClone = list.clone();
Object out = listClone.get(??);
initialization
& scheduling
Object in = new Object();
List list = new List()
list.add(in);
List listClone = list.clone();
Object out = listClone.get(0);
return in == out;
Skeleton construction. Our algorithm first constructs the
skeleton of the unit test. In particular, a witness for s must
include a call to each function m 1 , ..., mk , where the variables
zi , w i ∈ Vmi are parameters or return values of mi , since
the graph G extracted from the unit test must by definition
contain edges connecting the w i to zi+1 . For each function
call y ← m(x), the argument x and the left-hand side variable
y are left as holes ?? to be filled in subsequent steps.
Fill holes. Second, our algorithm fills the holes in the skeleton corresponding to reference variables. In particular, for
each pair of function calls ??y,i ← mi (??x,i ) and ??y,i+1 ←
mi+1 (??x,i+1 ), it fills the holes ??y,i and ??x,i+1 depending
Ai
on the edge w i −−→ zi+1 :
Figure 7. Steps in the witness synthesis algorithm for a
candidate path specification for Box. Code added at each
step is highlighted in blue. Scheduling is shown in the same
line as initialization.
• Case Ai = Transfer: In this case, w i is a return value
and zi+1 is a parameter. Thus, the algorithm fills ??y,i
and ??x,i+1 with the same fresh variable x.
• Case Ai = Transfer: This case is analogous to the
case Ai = Transfer.
• Case Ai = Alias: In this case, w i and zi+1 are both
parameters. Thus, the algorithm fills ??y,i and ??x,i+1
with the same fresh variable x, and additionally adds
to the test an allocation statement x ← X ().
Then, the specifications of length at most N in M diff are
ob thisset (thisclone r clone )0 thisget r get
ob thisset (thisclone r clone )1 thisget r get
...
ob thisset (thisclone r clone )N thisget r get ,
We show in Theorem 5.2, the added statements ensure that
P is a potential witness for s.
all of which are accepted by our noisy oracle O. Therefore,
our algorithm greedily accepts this merge and continues.
The remaining merges fail and our algorithm returns this
automaton.
5.4
Initialization. Third, our algorithm initializes the remaining reference variables and primitive variables in the unit
test. In particular, function calls y ← mi (x) may have additional parameters that need to be filled. For Theorem 5.2 to
hold, we require that remaining reference variables are filled
with the value null.
However, this approach is likely to synthesize unit tests
that fail (by raising exceptions) even when s is precise. Therefore, we alternatively use a heuristic where we allocate a
fresh variable for each reference variable. For allocating reference variables that are passed as arguments to constructors,
we have to be careful to avoid infinite recursion; for example, a constructor Integer(Integer i); should be avoided.
Our algorithm uses a shortest-path algorithm to generate the
smallest possible initialization statements; see Appendix B.3
for details. With this approach, we can no longer guarantee that P is a witness and our oracle may be susceptible to
false positives. In our evaluation, we show that this heuristic
substantially improves recall with no reduction in precision.
Primitive variables can be initialized arbitrarily, but the
choice of initialization affects whether P is a witness when s
is precise. We initialize primitive variables using default values (0 for numeric variables and true for boolean variables)
that work well in practice.
Unit Test Synthesis
We describe how we synthesize a unit test that is a potential
witness for a given specification
s = (z 1 d w 1 → ... → zk d w k ),
relegating
details to Appendix B. Recall that the semantics
Ók −1
Ai
A
e ⇒ (z 1 −
e Then,
of s are
−→ zi+1 ∈ G
→ w k ∈ G).
i=1 w i −
consider a program P that satisfies the following properties:
• The conclusion of s does not hold statically for P with
A
e ∅).
empty specifications, i.e., z 1 −
→ w k < G(P,
Ai
e {s})
• The premise of s holds for P, i.e., w i −−→ zi+1 ∈ G(P,
for each i ∈ [k − 1].
A
• For every set S of path specifications, if z 1 −
→ wk ∈
e S), then S ∪ {s} is equivalent to S.
G(P,
Intuitively, if program P is a potential witness for path spece then
ification s with premise ψ and conclusion ϕ = (e ∈ G),
s is the only path specification that can be used by the static
9
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
400,000
we demonstrate the usefulness of the specifications inferred
by Atlas for a static information flow analysis, comparing to
the existing, handwritten specifications, even though many
of these specifications were designed specifically for the
apps in our benchmark. Second, we evaluate the precision
and recall of Atlas by comparing to ground truth specifications; furthermore, we demonstrate the effectiveness of using
specifications by showing that ground truth specifications
significantly decreases false positives compared to analyzing
the actual library implementation. Finally, we analyze some
of the choices made when designing our algorithm.
To compare how two different sets of specifications impact
the results of a static analysis, we examine the ratio of the
sizes of the computed relations. We preprocess these sizes
in two ways. First, we only consider relations between program variables. Second, we subtract off trivial relations that
can be computed even when no points-to specifications are
provided (i.e., all library functions are treated as no-ops with
respect to heap effects). For example, for computed points-to
edges, the metric we use is
Jimple LOC
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
programs
Figure 8. Jimple lines of code of the apps in our benchmark.
Scheduling. Fourth, our algorithm determines the ordering
of the statements in the unit test. There are many possible
choices of statement ordering, which affect whether P is a
witness when s is precise. There are hard constraints on the
ordering (in particular, a variable must be defined before it
is used) and soft constraints (in particular, statements corresponding to edges w i → zi+1 for smaller i should occur
earlier in P). Our scheduling algorithm produces an ordering
that satisfies the hard constraints while trying to satisfy as
many soft constraints as possible. It does so using a greedy
strategy, i.e., it orders the statements sequentially from first
to last, choosing at each step the statement that satisfies the
hard constraints and the most soft constraints; see Appendix B.4.
R pt (S, S ′) =
where Π(S) ⊆ V × O is the set of points-to edges computed
using specifications S, and Π(∅) ⊆ V × O is the set of trivial
points-to edges.
We base our evaluation on a benchmark of Android apps,
including a mix of malicious and benign apps given to us
by a major security company. These apps include various
functionalities, such as games, battery managers, wallpaper
apps, flashlights, etc. We show the sizes of these apps in Jimple lines of code (Jimple is the intermediate representation
used by Soot) in Figure 8. The malware in this benchmark
consist primarily of apps that leak user information, such as
contacts, location, or SMS messages. Our information flow
client is designed to find such malicious behaviours.
Guarantees. Then, we have the following guarantee for the
unit test synthesis algorithm:
Theorem 5.2. The unit test P synthesized for path specification s is a potential witness for s.
We give a proof in Appendix E.
6
Implementation
We have implemented our specification inference algorithm
as Atlas. We use Atlas to infer specifications for a client
static information flow analysis for Android apps [6, 7, 16, 17].
The client is built on Chord [28] modified to use Soot [42] as
a backend. It computes an Andersen-style, 1-object-sensitive,
flow- and path-insensitive points-to analysis. Based on these
points-to sets, it computes an explicit information flow analysis [33], between sources such as location, contacts, and
device information, and sinks such as the Internet and SMS
messages. Our tool omits analyzing the Java standard library (version 7), and instead analyzes client code and userprovided code fragment specifications. We have handwritten several hundred code fragment specifications, including
many written specifically for our benchmark of android apps.
7
|Π(S) \ Π(∅)|
,
|Π(S ′) \ Π(∅)|
7.1
Comparison to Our Existing Specifications
Over the course of two years, we have handwritten points-to
specifications for our static information flow client for 90
classes in the Java standard library. These specifications were
written as needed for the apps that we analyzed, including
the apps in our benchmark. The most time consuming aspect of developing the existing specifications was not writing
them (they total a few thousand lines of code), but identifying which functions required summaries. Thus, they cover
many fewer functions than the handwritten ground truth
specifications described in Section 7.2, but are tailored to
finding information flows for apps in our benchmark.
We compare the quality of the inferred specifications to
these handwritten specifications, in particular, aiming to
improve our information flow client. We focus on inferring
specifications for the commonly used packages java.lang,
java.util, java.io, java.nio, java.net, and java.math;
Evaluation
In this section, we evaluate the ability of Atlas to infer
points-to specifications for the Java standard library. First,
10
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
0.9
5.0
atlas vs. true (points-to)
atlas vs. handwritten (flows)
6.0
implementation vs. true (points-to)
1
6.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
programs
0
(a)
programs
(b)
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
programs
(c)
Figure 9. In (a), we show the ratio of nontrivial information flows discovered using Atlas versus existing specifications.
We show the ratio of nontrivial points-to edges discovered using (b) Atlas versus ground truth and (c) ground truth versus
implementation. The ratios are sorted from highest to lowest for the 46 benchmark programs with nontrivial points-to edges.
Note that some values exceeded the graph scale.
7.2
all the specifications we have manually written for the Java
standard library are for classes in these packages.
Comparison to Ground Truth
To evaluate the precision and recall of our inferred specifications, we compare to ground truth specifications. Because of
the manual effort required to write ground truth specifications, we do so only for the 12 classes in the Java Collections
API that are most frequently used by our benchmark (98.5%
of calls to the Collections API target these 12 classes). We
focus on the Java Collections API (namely, classes that implement the Collection or Map interfaces), because it requires
by far the most complex points-to specifications.
Inferred specifications. We used a total of 12 million random samples for phase one, which ran in 44.9 minutes. Phase
two of our algorithm ran in 31.0 minutes; the initial FSA had
10,969 states, and the final FSA had 6,855 states. We compare
our inferred specifications to the handwritten ones. Most
strikingly, Atlas infers 5× as many specifications as the existing, handwritten ones—Atlas infers specifications for 878
library functions, whereas handwritten specifications cover
only 159 library functions. Furthermore, Atlas infers 89%
of the handwritten specifications.
We manually examined the 5 false negatives (i.e., handwritten specifications that Atlas fails to infer) for the Collections API. Each one is due to a false negative in the unit
test synthesis. For example, the function subList(int,int)
in the List class requires a call of the form subList(0, 1)
to retrieve the first object in the list. Similarly, the function
set(int,Object) in the List class requires an object to
already be in the list or it raises an index out-of-bounds exception. The potential witnesses synthesized by Atlas fail
to exercise the relevant behaviors in these instances.
Finally, we manually examined more than 200 of the inferred specifications; all of them were precise, which is strong
evidence that our tool has very few if any false positives despite the heuristics we employ.
Inferred specifications. We examine the top 50 most frequently called functions in our benchmark (in total, accounting for 95% of the function calls). We count a specification
as correct if it is identical to the specification we would have
written by hand; for specifications with multiple statements,
we count each statement fractionally. The recall of our algorithm is 97% (i.e., we inferred the correct specification for
97% of the 50 functions) and the precision is 100% (i.e., each
specification is as precise as the true specification).
Points-to sets. To show the quality of the specifications inferred by Atlas, we study the ratio R pt (S atlas , S true ) of using
specifications inferred by Atlas to using ground truth specifications. We found that using Atlas does not compute a
single false positive points-to edge compared to using ground
truth specifications, i.e., the precision of Atlas is 100%. Thus,
1−R pt (S atlas , S true ) is the rate of false negative points-to edges
when using Atlas. Figure 9 (b) shows R pt (S atlas , S true ) for
each app in our benchmark, sorted by magnitude. This ratio
is 1.0 for almost half of the programs, i.e., for almost half the
programs, there are no false negatives. The median recall is
99.0%, and the average recall is 75.8%.
Information flows. To show how Atlas can improve upon
our existing handwritten specifications, we study the ratio
R flow (S atlas , S hand ) of information flows computed using Atlas versus using the existing, handwritten specifications. A
higher ratio (R flow > 1) says that Atlas has higher recall,
and a lower ratio (R flow < 1) says that handwritten specifications have higher recall. Figure 9 (a) shows R(S atlas , S hand ).
Overall, Atlas finds 52% more information flows compared
to the handwritten specifications. The size of this gap is noteworthy because we have already analyzed these apps over
the past few years—many of the existing specifications were
written specifically for this benchmark.
Benefits of using specifications. We show that using specifications can greatly improve the precision and soundness
of a static analysis. In particular, we compare the ground
truth specifications to the library implementation, i.e., the
class files comprising the actual implementation of the Collections API (developed by Oracle). We compute the ratio
11
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
R pt (S impl , S true ) of analyzing the library implementation S impl
to analyzing the ground truth specifications S true . This ratio
measures the number of false positives due to analyzing the
library implementation instead of using ground truth specifications, since every points-to edge computed using the
implementation but not the ground truth specifications is
a false positive. Figure 9 (c) shows this ratio R pt (S impl , S true ).
For a third of programs, the false positive rate is more than
100% (i.e., when R pt ≥ 2), and for four programs, the false
positive rate is more than 300% (i.e., R pt ≥ 4). The average
false positive rate is 115.2%, and the median is 62.1%. Furthermore, for two of the programs, there are false negatives
(i.e., R pt < 1) due to unanalyzable calls to native code.
7.3
the existing, handwritten specifications, and is furthermore
very close to ground truth. In addition, we have shown that
Atlas can substantially improve recall on an information
flow client compared to the handwritten specifications, despite the fact that we have already written specifications
specifically for apps in this benchmark. Thus, Atlas substantially improves the practicality of using specifications
to model hard-to-analyze code in static analysis. We believe
that the remaining gap can be bridged by the human analyst.
8
Inferring specifications for library code. Techniques have
been proposed for mining specifications for library code
from executions, e.g., taint specifications (i.e., whether taint
flows from the argument to the return value) [13], functional
specifications of library functions [19], specifications for
x86 instructions [18], and specifications for callback control
flow [20]. In contrast, points-to specifications that span multiple functions are more complex properties. One approach
is to infer points-to specifications using data gathered from
deployed instrumented apps [9]. In contrast, our algorithm
actively synthesizes unit tests that exercise the library code
and requires no instrumentation of deployed apps. Another
approach is to interact with a human analyst to infer specifications [1, 8, 47]. These approach guarantee soundness, but
still require substantial human effort, e.g., in [8], the analyst
may need to write more than a dozen points-to specifications
to analyze a single app. Finally, [2] uses a static approach to
infer callgraph specifications for library code.
Design Choices
Finally, we compare the performance of different design
choices for our specification inference algorithm; in particular, we infer specifications for 733 library functions in the
Java Collections API using different design choices.
Positive examples: random sampling vs. MCTS. We sample two million candidate path specifications using each
sampling algorithm. Random sampling found 3,124 positive
examples, whereas MCTS found 10,153.
Object initialization: null vs. instantiation. Each of the
11,613 positive examples passed the unit test constructed
using instantiation, but only 7,721 passed when using null
initialization, i.e., instantiation finds 50% more specifications.
As discussed above, even with this heuristic, we estimate
that the false positive rate of our tool is zero.
7.4
Related Work
Inferring program properties. There has been work inferring program invariants from executions [29], including approaches using machine learning [34–36]. The most closely
related work is [10], which uses an active learning strategy
to infer program input grammars for blackbox code. In contrast, our goal is to infer points-to specifications for library
code. There has also been work on specifications encoding
desired properties of client programs (rather than encoding
behaviors of the library code), both using dynamic analysis [7, 11, 23, 25, 31, 38] and using static analysis [4, 45].
Discussion
As we have seen, using ground truth substantially improves
precision and soundness compared to analyzing the library
implementation—for the one-time cost of writing specifications, we can eliminate imprecision due to deep call hierarchies and unsoundness due to native code, dynamically
loaded code, reflection, etc. In fact, such an approach is already used in production static analysis systems to handle
hard-to-analyze code [14].
However, manually writing specifications that are complete or close to complete is impractical—writing ground
truth specifications for just 12 classes took us more than a
week of time and contains 1,731 lines of code, but there are
more than 4,000 classes in the Java standard library. Typically, manual effort is focused on writing specifications for
the most commonly used functions, but this approach leaves
a long tail of missing specifications [8]. Moreover, handwritten specifications can be error prone to write [18]. Finally,
libraries grow over time—for example, the Java 9 standard
library contains more than 2,000 new classes—so specifications must be maintained over time.
We have shown that Atlas automatically covers an order
of magnitude more of the Java Collections API compared to
Static points-to analysis. There is a large literature on
static points-to analysis [5, 15, 27, 37, 44], including formulations based on set-constraints and context-free language
reachability [21, 22, 32, 41]. Recent work has focused on
improving context-sensitivity [24, 39, 40, 43, 46]. Using specifications in conjunction with these analyses can improve
precision, scalability, and even soundness. One alternative
is to use demand driven static analyses to avoid analyzing
the entire library code [41]; however, these approaches are
not designed to work with missing code, and furthermore do
not provide much benefit for demanding clients that require
analyzing a substantial fraction of the library code.
12
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
9
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Conclusion
[16] Yu Feng, Saswat Anand, Isil Dillig, and Alex Aiken. 2014. Apposcopy:
Semantics-based detection of android malware through static analysis.
In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on
Foundations of Software Engineering. ACM, 576–587.
[17] Adam P Fuchs, Avik Chaudhuri, and Jeffrey S Foster. 2009. Scandroid:
Automated security certification of android. (2009).
[18] Stefan Heule, Eric Schkufza, Rahul Sharma, and Alex Aiken. 2016.
Stratified synthesis: automatically learning the x86-64 instruction set.
In Proceedings of the 37th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming
Language Design and Implementation. ACM, 237–250.
[19] Stefan Heule, Manu Sridharan, and Satish Chandra. 2015. Mimic:
Computing models for opaque code. In Proceedings of the 2015 10th
Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. ACM, 710–720.
[20] Jinseong Jeon, Xiaokang Qiu, Jonathan Fetter-Degges, Jeffrey S Foster,
and Armando Solar-Lezama. 2016. Synthesizing framework models
for symbolic execution. In Software Engineering (ICSE), 2016 IEEE/ACM
38th International Conference on. IEEE, 156–167.
[21] John Kodumal and Alex Aiken. 2004. The set constraint/CFL reachability connection in practice. ACM Sigplan Notices 39, 6 (2004), 207–218.
[22] John Kodumal and Alexander Aiken. 2005. Banshee: A scalable
constraint-based analysis toolkit. In SAS, Vol. 5. Springer, 218–234.
[23] Ted Kremenek, Paul Twohey, Godmar Back, Andrew Ng, and Dawson
Engler. 2006. From uncertainty to belief: Inferring the specification
within. In Proceedings of the 7th symposium on Operating systems design
and implementation. USENIX Association, 161–176.
[24] Percy Liang and Mayur Naik. 2011. Scaling abstraction refinement via
pruning. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 46. ACM, 590–601.
[25] Benjamin Livshits, Aditya V Nori, Sriram K Rajamani, and Anindya
Banerjee. 2009. Merlin: specification inference for explicit information
flow problems. ACM Sigplan Notices 44, 6 (2009), 75–86.
[26] David Melski and Thomas Reps. 2000. Interconvertibility of a class
of set constraints and context-free-language reachability. Theoretical
Computer Science 248, 1 (2000), 29–98.
[27] Ana Milanova, Atanas Rountev, and Barbara G Ryder. 2002. Parameterized object sensitivity for points-to and side-effect analyses for Java.
In ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 27. ACM, 1–11.
[28] Mayur Naik, Alex Aiken, and John Whaley. 2006. Effective static race
detection for Java. Vol. 41. ACM.
[29] Jeremy W Nimmer and Michael D Ernst. 2002. Automatic generation
of program specifications. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
27, 4 (2002), 229–239.
[30] Jose Oncina and Pedro Garcia. 1992. Identifying regular languages in
polynomial time. Advances in Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition 5, 99-108 (1992), 15–20.
[31] Murali Krishna Ramanathan, Ananth Grama, and Suresh Jagannathan.
2007. Static specification inference using predicate mining. In ACM
SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 42. ACM, 123–134.
[32] Thomas Reps. 1998. Program analysis via graph reachability. Information and software technology 40, 11 (1998), 701–726.
[33] Andrei Sabelfeld and Andrew C Myers. 2003. Language-based
information-flow security. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications 21, 1 (2003), 5–19.
[34] Rahul Sharma and Alex Aiken. 2014. From invariant checking to invariant inference using randomized search. In International Conference
on Computer Aided Verification. Springer, 88–105.
[35] Rahul Sharma, Aditya V Nori, and Alex Aiken. 2012. Interpolants as
classifiers. In International Conference on Computer Aided Verification.
Springer, 71–87.
[36] Rahul Sharma, Eric Schkufza, Berkeley Churchill, and Alex Aiken.
2013. Data-driven equivalence checking. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices,
Vol. 48. ACM, 391–406.
[37] Olin Shivers. 1991. Control-flow analysis of higher-order languages.
Ph.D. Dissertation. Citeseer.
Specifications summarizing the points-to effects of library
code can be used to increase precision, recall, and scalability
of running a static points-to analysis on any client code. By
automatically inferring such specifications, Atlas fully automatically achieves all of these benefits without the typical
time-consuming and error-prone process of writing specifications by hand. We believe that Atlas is an important
step towards improving the usability of static analysis in
practice.
References
[1] Aws Albarghouthi, Isil Dillig, and Arie Gurfinkel. 2016. Maximal
specification synthesis. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 51. ACM, 789–
801.
[2] Karim Ali and Ondřej Lhoták. 2013. Averroes: Whole-program analysis
without the whole program. In European Conference on Object-Oriented
Programming. Springer, 378–400.
[3] Rajeev Alur, Pavol Černỳ, Parthasarathy Madhusudan, and Wonhong
Nam. 2005. Synthesis of interface specifications for Java classes. ACM
SIGPLAN Notices 40, 1 (2005), 98–109.
[4] Glenn Ammons, Rastislav Bodík, and James R Larus. 2002. Mining
specifications. ACM Sigplan Notices 37, 1 (2002), 4–16.
[5] Lars Ole Andersen. 1994. Program analysis and specialization for the
C programming language. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Cophenhagen.
[6] Steven Arzt, Siegfried Rasthofer, Christian Fritz, Eric Bodden, Alexandre Bartel, Jacques Klein, Yves Le Traon, Damien Octeau, and Patrick
McDaniel. 2014. Flowdroid: Precise context, flow, field, object-sensitive
and lifecycle-aware taint analysis for android apps. ACM SIGPLAN
Notices 49, 6 (2014), 259–269.
[7] Osbert Bastani, Saswat Anand, and Alex Aiken. 2015. Interactively
verifying absence of explicit information flows in Android apps. ACM
SIGPLAN Notices 50, 10 (2015), 299–315.
[8] Osbert Bastani, Saswat Anand, and Alex Aiken. 2015. Specification
inference using context-free language reachability. In ACM SIGPLAN
Notices, Vol. 50. ACM, 553–566.
[9] Osbert Bastani, Lazaro Clapp, Saswat Anand, Rahul Sharma, and Alex
Aiken. 2017. Eventually Sound Points-To Analysis with Missing Code.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.03436 (2017).
[10] Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang. 2017.
Synthesizing program input grammars. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM
SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation. ACM, 95–110.
[11] Nels E Beckman and Aditya V Nori. 2011. Probabilistic, modular and
scalable inference of typestate specifications. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices,
Vol. 46. ACM, 211–221.
[12] Cameron B Browne, Edward Powley, Daniel Whitehouse, Simon M
Lucas, Peter I Cowling, Philipp Rohlfshagen, Stephen Tavener, Diego
Perez, Spyridon Samothrakis, and Simon Colton. 2012. A survey of
monte carlo tree search methods. IEEE Transactions on Computational
Intelligence and AI in Games 4, 1 (2012), 1–43.
[13] Lazaro Clapp, Saswat Anand, and Alex Aiken. 2015. Modelgen: mining
explicit information flow specifications from concrete executions. In
Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Software Testing
and Analysis. ACM, 129–140.
[14] Facebook. 2017. Adding models. (2017). http://fbinfer.com/docs/
adding-models.html
[15] Manuel Fähndrich, Jeffrey S Foster, Zhendong Su, and Alexander Aiken.
1998. Partial online cycle elimination in inclusion constraint graphs.
ACM SIGPLAN Notices 33, 5 (1998), 85–96.
13
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
[38] Sharon Shoham, Eran Yahav, Stephen J Fink, and Marco Pistoia. 2008.
Static specification mining using automata-based abstractions. IEEE
Transactions on Software Engineering 34, 5 (2008), 651–666.
[39] Yannis Smaragdakis, George Kastrinis, and George Balatsouras. 2014.
Introspective analysis: context-sensitivity, across the board. In ACM
SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 49. ACM, 485–495.
[40] Manu Sridharan and Rastislav Bodík. 2006. Refinement-based contextsensitive points-to analysis for Java. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 41.
ACM, 387–400.
[41] Manu Sridharan, Denis Gopan, Lexin Shan, and Rastislav Bodík. 2005.
Demand-driven points-to analysis for Java. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices,
Vol. 40. ACM, 59–76.
[42] Raja Vallée-Rai, Phong Co, Etienne Gagnon, Laurie Hendren, Patrick
Lam, and Vijay Sundaresan. 1999. Soot-a Java bytecode optimization
framework. In Proceedings of the 1999 conference of the Centre for
Advanced Studies on Collaborative research. IBM Press, 13.
[43] John Whaley and Monica S Lam. 2004. Cloning-based context-sensitive
pointer alias analysis using binary decision diagrams. In ACM SIGPLAN
Notices, Vol. 39. ACM, 131–144.
[44] Robert P Wilson and Monica S Lam. 1995. Efficient context-sensitive
pointer analysis for C programs. Vol. 30. ACM.
[45] Jinlin Yang, David Evans, Deepali Bhardwaj, Thirumalesh Bhat, and
Manuvir Das. 2006. Perracotta: mining temporal API rules from imperfect traces. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on
Software engineering. ACM, 282–291.
[46] Xin Zhang, Ravi Mangal, Radu Grigore, Mayur Naik, and Hongseok
Yang. 2014. On abstraction refinement for program analyses in Datalog.
ACM SIGPLAN Notices 49, 6 (2014), 239–248.
[47] Haiyan Zhu, Thomas Dillig, and Isil Dillig. 2013. Automated inference
of library specifications for source-sink property verification. In Asian
Symposium on Programming Languages and Systems. Springer, 290–
306.
14
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
A
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Static Points-To Analysis with Regular
Sets of Path Specifications
z
(initial parameter)
z
In this section, we describe how to run our static pointsto analysis in conjunction with a possibly infinite regular
set S of path specifications (assumed to be represented as
an FSA, i.e., S = L(M̂)). In particular, our static analysis
converts S to a set S˜ of code fragment specifications, which
are replacements for the library code that have the same
points-to effects as encoded by S.
Given path specifications S, our static analysis constructs
˜ i.e., G(P, S) =
equivalent code fragment specifications S,
˜
˜
G(P, S). In other words, S has the same semantics as S with
respect to our static points-to analysis. One detail in our def˜ may contain additional
inition of equivalence is that G(P, S)
vertices corresponding to variables and abstract objects in
the code fragment specifications; we omit these extra vertices
and their relations at the end of the static analysis.
(initial return)
z
(final return)
(Ai = Alias)
Converting a Single Path Specification
into an equivalent set of code fragment specifications, where
Ai = Alias for each i and z 1 is a parameter. Let the code
fragment specifications S˜ corresponding to s be:
...
mk = {w k ← zk .fk −1 },
z
w
z
w
(Ai = Transfer)
p−
→ q −−→ r ∈ M̂, z = pm , w = rm
wX(), t ← z.fp , w.fr ← t ∈ m
(Ai = Transfer)
p−
→ q −−→ r ∈ M̂, {z, w } ⊆ {pm , rm }
z ← X (), t ← w.fr , z.fp ← t ∈ m
w
q init −
→ q −−→ q fin ∈ M̂, {z, w } ⊆ {pm , rm }
w ←z ∈m
Since each fi is a fresh field, there is only one edge labeled
Store[fi ] and only one edge labeled Load[fi ]. Thus, this proAlias
˜ and
duction can only be triggered if (i) zi −−−→ w i ∈ G(P, S),
˜ = G(P, {s}) ∪ G ′(P, S),
˜
Proposition A.1. We have G(P, S)
′
˜
˜
where G (P, S) consists of the edges in G(P, S) that refer to
˜
vertices corresponding to variables and abstract objects in S.
Transfer
˜ If triggered,
(ii) for some vertex x, x −−−−−−→ ti ∈ G(P, S).
Transfer
˜ For
the static analysis adds an edge x −−−−−−→ ti+1 to G(P, S).
i = 1, the only vertices x satisfying the second condition are
Alias
˜
x = z 1 and x = t 1 . By induction, if w i −−−→ zi+1 ∈ G(P, S)
for each i, we have
˜ SupProof. (sketch) First, we show that G(P, {s} ⊆ G(P, S).
Ai
pose that the premise of s holds, i.e., zi −−→ w i+1 ∈ G for
Transfer
each i. Then, the static analysis computes z 1 −−−−−−→ w k ∈
Transfer
˜ as
G(P, {s}); we need to show that z 1 −−−−−−→ w k ∈ G(P, S)
well. Note that we have
Transfer
˜
z 1 −−−−−−→ ti ∈ G(P, S)
Transfer
˜
t j −−−−−−→ ti ∈ G(P, S)
Load[f 1 ]
for each j ≤ i. None of the ti are part of an Assign edge
except t 1 and tk ; for the latter, the production Transfer →
Transfer
˜
Transfer Assign triggers and we get z 1 −−−−−−→ w k ∈ G(P, S).
˜ that does not refer to
This edge is the only one in G(P, S)
vertices extracted from the code fragments, so the claim
follows.
□
˜
z 1 −−−−−−→ w 1 −−−→ z 2 −−−−−−→ t 2 ∈ G(P, S)
Load[f ]
Alias
2
2
˜
t 2 −−−−−−→ w 2 −−−→ z 3 −−−−−−→ t 3 ∈ G(P, S)
...
Load[f
w
Transfer → Transfer Store[f ] Alias Load[f ].
where f 1 , ...fk−1 ∈ F are fresh fields and t 2 , ..., tk −1 are fresh
variables. Then:
]
z
p−
→ q −−→ r ∈ M̂, z = pm , w = pm
t ← z.fp , w.fr ← t ∈ m
Transfer
m 2 = {t 2 ← z 2 .f 1 , w 2 .f 2 ← t 2 }
Store[f
w
By induction, the static analysis computes z 1 −−−−−−→ ti ∈
˜ for each i ∈ [k −1]. Thus, the static analysis computes
G(P, S)
Transfer
˜ as claimed.
z 1 −−−−−−→ w k ∈ G(P, S),
˜ ⊆ G(P, S) ∪
Next, we show the converse, i.e., that G(P, S)
′
˜
G (P, S). First, note that the only production with Store[f ] is
m 1 = {w 1 .f 1 ← z 1 }
Store[f ]
z
p−
→ q −−→ q fin ∈ M̂, z = rm , w = rm
t ← X (), z.fp ← t, w ← t ∈ m
Figure 10. Rules for generating code fragment specifications
from path specifications defined by a finite state automaton
M̂ = (Q, Vpath , δ, q init , Q fin ), where for simplicity we assume
M̂ has a single accept state q fin .
s = (z 1 d w 1 → ... → zk d w k )
Alias
w
p−
→ q −−→ q fin ∈ M̂, z = pm , w = rm
w ← z.fp ∈ m
z
For intuition, we begin by describing how to convert a single
path specification
Store[f 1 ]
w
q init −
→ q −−→ r ∈ M̂, z = rm , w ∈ {pm , rm }
t ← X (), z ← t, w.fr ← t ∈ m
(final parameter)
(initial final)
A.1
w
q init −
→ q −−→ r ∈ M̂, z = pm , w ∈ {pm , rm }
w.fr ← z ∈ m
]
Alias
k −1
k −1
˜
tk −1 −−−−−−−−→ w k −1 −−−→ zk −−−−−−−−→ w k ∈ G(P, S).
15
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
Candidate (Regular Expression)
Candidate (Finite State Automaton)
ob d thisset → thisget d r get
ob d thisset
→ thisclone d r clone
→ thisget d r get
∗
q init
ob
q1
thisset
qf
thisget
q2
q init
ob
q1
thisset
qf
thisget
q2
r get
r get
Code Fragments
q fin
q fin
r clone
thisclone
q3
q init
ob
q1
ob d thisset → thisget d r get
thisset
qf
thisget
q2
r get
thisclone
q3
+ ob d thisset → thisclone d r clone
→ thisget → r get
r clone
qg
+ ob d thisset → thisclone d r clone
→ thisclone d r clone
→ thisget d r get
thisget
thisclone
q4
thisget
r clone
qh
q fin
void set(Object ob) { f = ob; }
Object get() { return f; }
void set(Object ob) { f = ob; }
Object get() { return f; }
Box clone() {
Box b = new Box(); // ~o_clone
b.f = f;
return b; }}
void set(Object ob) { f = ob; }
Object get() {
return f;
return g;
return h; }
Box clone() {
Box b = new Box(); // ~o_clone
b.g = f;
b.h = g;
return b; }}
Figure 11. Examples of candidate code fragment specifications (left column), and the equivalent path specifications as a
regular expression (middle column) and as a finite state automaton (right column).
A.2
B
Converting a Regular Set of Path Specifications
Our construction generalizes straightforwardly to constructing code fragment specifications from M̂. For each state
q ∈ Q, we introduce a fresh field fq ∈ F . Intuitively, transitions into q correspond to stores into fq , and transitions
coming out of q correspond to loads into fq . In particular, we
include statements in m according to the rules in Figure 10.
The following guarantee follows similarly to the proof of
Proposition A.1:
Unit Test Synthesis Algorithm
In this section, we describe our algorithm for synthesizing
a unit test to check correctness of a candidate path specification. For example, in Figure 12, the synthesized unit
test contains exactly the external edges in the candidate’s
premise:
Alias
Transfer
thisadd −−−→ thisclone , r clone −−−−−−→ thisget .
Upon executing this unit test, the candidate’s conclusion
′
˜ = G(P, S) ∪ G (P, S),
˜
Proposition A.2. We have G(P, S)
′
˜
where G (P, S) is defined as before.
Transfer
in −−−−−−→ out
holds dynamically. Therefore, this unit test witnesses the
correctness of the given candidate.
Our algorithm first constructs a skeleton containing a call
to each function in the specification. Then, it (i) fills in holes
with variable names, (ii) initializes variables, and (iii) orders
(or schedules) statements. The last step also adds a statement
returning whether the candidate’s conclusion holds.
There are certain constraints on the choices that ensure
that the synthesized unit test is a valid witness. Even with
these constraints, a number of additional choices remain.
Each choice produces a valid unit test, but some of these unit
tests may not pass even if the candidate specification is correct. We describe the choices made by our algorithm, which
empirically finds almost all correct candidate specifications.
In Figure 11, we show examples of path specifications (first
column), the corresponding FSA (middle column), and the
generated code fragment specifications. For example, in the
second line, the transitions
ob
thisset
thisget
r get
q init −−→ q 1 −−−−−→ q 2 −−−−−→ q 3 −−−→ q fin
generate the specifications for set (the first two transitions,
with field f = fq2 ) and get (the last two transitions), and the
self-loop
thisclone
r clone
q 2 −−−−−−−→ q 6 −−−−→ q 2
generates the specification for clone.
16
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
B.1
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
ob d thisadd → thisclone d r clone
→ thisget d r get
Skeleton Construction
To witness correctness of the candidate path specification,
the synthesized unit test must exhibit exactly the external
edges in its premise. In particular, the unit test must include
a call to each function in the candidate. Our algorithm constructs a skeleton consisting of these calls, for example, the
skeleton on the second step of Figure 12. A symbol ??, called
a hole, is included for each parameter and return value of
each function call, and must be filled in with a variable name.
B.2
Filling Holes
The external edges in the candidate specification impose
constraints on the arguments that should be used in each
function call. In particular, the synthesized unit test must
exhibit every behavior encoded by the external edges in the
candidate specification:
• Alias: For an aliasing edge pmi −−−→ pmi +1 , the algorithm has to ensure that the arguments pmi (passed to
mi ) and pmi +1 (passed to mi+1 ) are aliased.
Transfer
• Transfer: For a transfer edge rmi −−−−−−→ pmi +1 , the
algorithm has to use the return value of mi as the
argument passed to mi+1 (and similarly for backwards
fill holes
list.add(in);
List listClone = list.clone();
Object out = listClone.get(??);
initialization
& scheduling
Object in = new Object();
List list = new List()
list.add(in);
List listClone = list.clone();
Object out = listClone.get(0);
return in == out;
Then, our algorithm computes the connected components
in this graph. For each connected component, the algorithm
chooses a fresh variable name, and each hole in that connected component is filled with this variable name.
For example, for the candidate in Figure 12, our algorithm
computes the following partitions:
Transfer
transfer edges pmi −−−−−−→ rmi +1 ).
For example, the holes in the skeleton in Figure 12 are filled
so that the following premises are satisfied:
Transfer
thisadd −−−→ thisclone , r clone −−−−−−→ thisget .
{ob}, {thisadd , thisclone }, {r clone , thisget }, {r get },
One issue is that internal edges may be self-loops, in which
case more than two parameters may need to be aliased. For
example, consider the following candidate:
and fills the corresponding holes with the variables names
in, list, listClone, out,
ob d thisadd → thisclone d thisid
→ thisget d r get .
??.add(??);
?? = ??.clone();
?? = ??.get(??);
Figure 12. Steps in the unit test synthesis algorithm (right)
for a candidate path specification for List (left). Code added
at each step is highlighted in blue. Scheduling is shown in
the same line as initialization—it chooses the final order of
the statements. This figure is a duplicate of Figure 7, and is
shown here for clarity.
Alias
Alias
skeleton
respectively. Similarly, for (5), we compute partitions
(5)
{ob}, {thisadd , thisclone , thisget }, {r clone }, {r get }.
For the unit test for this candidate, the three calls to add,
clone, and get must all share the same receiver:
The variable names are the same as those chosen in Figure 12.
list.add(in);
List listClone = list.clone();
Object out = list.get(??);
B.3
Variable Initialization
We describe primitive variables and reference variables separately. For the case of initializing reference variables, we
describe two different strategies:
• Null: Whenever possible, initialize to null.
• Instantiation: Whenever possible, use constructor
calls.
The first strategy ensures that the unit test does not exhibit
additional transfer and alias edges beyond those in the candidate specification. The second strategy may produce a unit
test that does not witness correctness, since it may include
spurious edges not in the premise of the candidate. However,
certain functions require that some of their arguments are
not null; for example, the put function in the Hashtable
class. We show empirically that the second variant identifies
Our algorithm partitions the holes into subsets that must
be aliased—since aliasing is a transitive relation, every hole in
a subset has to be aliased with every other hole in that subset.
To do so, the algorithm constructs an undirected graph where
the vertices are the holes, and an edge (h, h ′) ∈ E connects
two holes h and h ′ in the following cases:
• There is an external edge wmi → zmi +1 in the candidate
specification, where h is the hole corresponding to wmi
and h ′ is the hole corresponding to zmi +1 .
• There is an internal edge pmi d pmi in the candidate
specification, where h is the hole corresponding to the
pmi on the left-hand side and h ′ is the hole corresponding to the pmi on the right-hand side.
17
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
a number of candidates missed by the first, and that these
additional specifications are in fact correct.
X1, ..., Xk, we recursively define the constructor
Primitive initialization. We initialize all primitive variables with 0 (except characters, which are initialized as ’a’).
In our experience, the only important choice of primitive
value is the index parameter passed to functions such as get,
which retrieve data from collections. Choosing the index =
0 retrieves the single object the unit test previously added
to the collection. Testing more primitive values is possible
but has so far been unnecessary.
Therefore, devising a constructor call to instantiate an object
of type X amounts to computing a path in G with root X. Paths
to every reachable vertex can be efficiently computed using a
standard dynamic programming algorithm. Furthermore, we
can add a weight w e to each edge in e ∈ E. Then, the
Í shortest
path (i.e., the path minimizing the total weight v ∈T eT ,v )
can similarly be efficiently computed. We choose all weights
w e = 1 for each e ∈ E.
For example, suppose that the List class has a single constructor List(Object val). Then, our algorithm constructs
a hypergraph with two vertices and two edges:
CT (X) = new X(CT (X1), ..., CT (Xk)).
Reference initialization using null. Reference variables
for which aliasing relations hold must be instantiated (unless
they have already been initialized as the return value of a
function call). Any other reference variable is initialized to
null. For example, in Figure 12, the variables list and out
must be instantiated, but cloneList has already been initialized as the return value of clone. In general, the unit test
we synthesize calls the constructor with the fewest number
of arguments; primitive arguments are initialized as before,
and reference arguments are initialized using null.
V = {Object, List}
E = {(Object, []), (List, [Object])}.
Then, the path corresponding to List is the tree T =
which corresponds to the constructor call
List
Object ,
new List(new Object())
used to instantiate variables of type List.
As with initializing primitive variables, multiple choices
of constructor calls could be used, but selecting a single
constructor suffices has been sufficient so far.
Reference initialization using instantiation. In this approach, we have to synthesize constructor calls when empty
constructors are unavailable. For example, if the only constructor for the List class was List(Object val), then we
would have to initialize an object of type Object as well:
B.4
Statement Scheduling
Note that the unit test now contains both function call statements as well as variable initialization statements added in
the previous step. All the added variable initialization statements can be executed first, so it suffices to schedule the
function call statements.
There are two kinds of constraints on scheduling function
calls. First, consider edges of the form
List list = new List(new Object());
We encode the problem of synthesizing a valid constructor
call as a directed hypergraph reachability problem. A directed
hypergraph is a pair G = (V , E), where V is a set of vertices,
and edges e ∈ E have the form e = (h, B), where h ∈ V is the
head of the edge, and B ⊆ V is its body. For our purposes,
B is a list rather than a set, and may contain a single vertex
multiple times.
We construct a hypergraph G = (V , E) where vertices
correspond to classes, and edges to constructors:
Transfer
rmi −−−−−−→ pmi +1
in the premise of the candidate path specification; they impose hard constraints on the schedule, since mi must be
called before mi+1 so its return value can be transfered to
• Vertices: A vertex v ∈ V is a library class.
• Edges: An edge e = (h, B) ∈ E is a constructor, where
h is the class of the constructed object and B is the list
of classes of the constructor parameters.
Transfer
pmi +1 (edges of the form pmi −−−−−−→ rmi +1 impose hard
constraints as well). For example, in Figure 12, the edge
Transfer
r clone −−−−−−→ thisget imposes the hard constraint that the
call to clone must be scheduled before the call to get. Then,
any of the following orderings is permitted:
For convenience, we also include primitive types as vertices
in G, along with an edge representing the “empty constructor”, which returns the initialization value described above.
Now, a path T in the hypergraph G = (V , E) is a finite tree
with root vT ∈ V (called the root of the path), such that for
each vertex v ∈ T , v and its (ordered) children [v 1 , ..., vk ] are
an edge eT ,v = (v, [v 1 , ..., vk ]) ∈ E. Note that for each leaf v
of T , there must necessarily be an edge (v, []) ∈ E, since v
has no children. Also, we say a vertex v ∈ V is reachable is
there exists a path with root v.
In our setting, a path in our hypergraph G corresponds to
a call to a constructor—for each vertex X ∈ T with children
[add, clone, get], [clone, add, get], [clone, get, add].
We use soft constraints to choose among schedules satisfying the hard constraints. Empirically, we observe that
the order of the functions in the specification is typically
the same as the order in which they must be called for the
conclusion to be exhibited dynamically. More precisely, function mi should be called before function m j whenever i < j.
In our example, the soft constraint says that add should be
scheduled before both clone and get.
18
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
∗
Our algorithm iteratively constructs a schedule [i 1 , ..., i k ]
of the function calls F = {m 1 , ..., mk }. At iteration t, it selects
the tth function call mi t from the remaining calls Ft ⊆ F .
It does so greedily, by identifying the choices G t ⊆ Ft that
satisfy the hard constraints, and then selecting mi t ∈ G t to be
optimal according to the soft constraints. These conditions
uniquely specify mi t , since our soft constraints are a total
ordering.
Our algorithm keeps track of the remaining statements Ft
as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), which includes an edge
mi → m j for each hard constraint that mi should be scheduled before m j . Then, G t is the set of roots of Ft . Furthermore,
our algorithm maintains G t as a priority queue, where the
priority of mi is i (the highest priority element in G t is the
element with the smallest index i).
We initialize F 1 = F ; then, G 1 is the subset of vertices in
F 1 without a parent. Updates are computed as follows:
such that A ⇒
= β 1α̃ 1 ...α̃ k −1 βk in C pt , where
(
Transfer if z 1 = pm1
A=
Alias
if z 1 = rm1
and
Assign
α̃ i = Assign
New New
Then, we prove that the conclusion of Theorem 4.2 holds for
S constructed with this algorithm.
C.2
G ⊆ G(S).
In Figure 12, F 1 has three vertices add (priority 1), clone
(priority 2), and get (priority 3), and a single edge clone →
get, and G 1 includes add and clone. Therefore, the selected
schedule is [add, clone, get].
FlowsTo
For simplicity, we focus on points-to edges o −−−−−−→ x; the
alias and transfer relations follow similarly. Suppose that
FlowsTo
Proof of Equivalence Theorem
α0
β1
α1
βk
αk
x 99K z 1 99K w 1 99K ... 99K w k 999K y,
(6)
where α = α 0 β 1α 1 ...βk α k . This decomposition suggests that
the following path specification may be applied to derive
Assumption C.1. Let Flib be fields accessed by the library
and Fprog be fields accessed by the program, and let the
shared fields be Fshare = Flib ∩ Fprog . We assume Fshare = ∅.
Transfer
x −−−−−−→ y:
z 1 d w 1 → ... → zk d w k .
We can remove this assumption by having the static analysis treat accesses to library fields in the program as calls to
getter and setter library functions.
(7)
At a high level, our proof has two parts. First, we prove the
case where the segments of α in the program do not contain
field accesses, i.e., α ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib )∗ , where
Σfree = {Assign, Assign, New, New}
Converting the Library Implementation to Path
Specifications
Σprog = {Store[f ], Load[f ], Store[f ], Load[f ] | f ∈ Fprog }
First, we describe how to convert the library implementation
into a set S of transfer and proxy object specifications. A
specification of the form
Σlib = {Store[f ], Load[f ], Store[f ], Load[f ] | f ∈ Flib }.
Second, we show how “nesting” of fields allows us to reduce
the general case to the case α ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib ∪ Σprog )∗ . In
particular, by Assumption C.1, the library field accesses and
program field accesses do not match one another. As previously discussed, this assumption can be enforced by a purely
syntactic program transformation where accesses to library
fields in the program are converted into calls to getter and
setter functions.
z 1 d w 1 → ... → zk d w k .
is included in S if there exist paths
β1
New
o −−−−−−→ y ∈ G(S); then, there must exist a path o −−−→
∗
α
x 99K y, where Transfer ⇒
= α. This path passes into and out
of library functions, leading to a decomposition
We prove Theorem 4.2, relegating the proof of technical
lemmas to Appendix D. To simplify the proof, we assume
the following:
C.1
Proof Overview
Let G denote the points-to sets computed by running the
static analysis with the library implementation available,
and G(S) denote the points-to sets computed by running the
static analysis with the path specifications S. We have to
prove that G = G(S); the direction G(S) ⊆ G follows easily,
since a path specification s is included in S exactly when
the library implementation would imply the same logical
formula as the semantics of s.
The challenging direction is to show that S is sound, i.e.,
1. The highest priority function call mi t in G t is removed
from both G t and from Ft .
2. For each child mi of mi t in Ft , we determine if mi is
now a root of Ft (i.e., none of its parents are in Ft ).
3. For every child mi that is now a root of Ft , we add mi
to G t with priority i.
C
if w i = pmi and zi+1 = rmi +1
if w i = rmi and zi+1 = pmi +1
if w i = pmi and zi+1 = pmi +1 .
βk
z 1 99K w 1 , ..., zk 99K w k
19
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
Consider a path of the form (6) such that α ∈ (Σfree ∪
Σlib )∗ . We need to show that in this case, we derive the edge
is “equivalent” to α̃ i . Intuitively, for α̃ i = Assign, we show
that the sequence of statements represented by α i exhibits
the same semantics as a single assignment. For example,
y ← x, z ← y has the same points-to effects as z ← x
(assuming y is temporary). We leverage the correspondence
established by formulating points-to analysis as context-free
language reachability:
Transfer
x −−−−−−→ y ∈ G(S), where S is constructed as in Section C.1.
Our proof of this claim relies on two results. The first result
says that for such a path, the conclusion of (7) holds when
each w i is connected to zi+1 by α i :
Proposition C.2. For any path of the form (6) such that
α ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib )∗ we have (i) the case w i = r i and zi+1 = r i+1
∗
cannot happen, and (ii) Transfer ⇒
= β 1α 1 β 2 ...α k−1 βk .
sequence of statements = sequence α ∈ Σ∗ .
For example, the first sequence of statements above corresponds to (Assign Assign), and the second to Assign.
Using this correspondence, we can reduce reasoning about
sequences of statements with equivalent semantics to studying equivalence classes of strings α ∈ Σ∗ :
As a consequence of this result, we know that the path
specification (7) is contained in S. The second result says
that the premise of (7) holds for our case:
Proposition C.3. For any path of the form (7) such that
α ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib )∗ , we have
∗
Ai ⇒
= αi
(∀i ∈ [k − 1])
∗
(∀i ∈ {0, k}).
Ai ⇒
= αi
equivalent sequences
of statements
γ αδ ∈ L(C pt ) ⇔ γ βδ ∈ L(C pt ) (∀γ , δ ∈ Σ∗ ).
Theorem C.4. Theorem 4.2 holds for any α ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib )∗ .
Transfer
Proof. Consider an edge x −−−−−−→ y ∈ G derived by the
static analysis using the library implementation. We claim
that this edge is derived by the static analysis when using
γ
Transfer
β
Proof. By definition, γ α βδ ⇔ γ α ′ βδ ⇔ γ α ′ β ′δ .
x −−−−−−→ z 1 −−−−−−→ w k −−−−−−→ y ∈ G(S),
Transfer
so the static analysis derives x −−−−−−→ y ∈ G(S), as claimed.
δ
□
In particular, Lemma C.5 shows that sequencing is welldefined for equivalence classes:
FlowsTo
Now, we know that any points-to edge o −−−−−−→ y ∈ G
Transfer
[α] [β] = [α β],
has the form o −−−→ x −−−−−−→ y. Since we have shown
Transfer
that x −−−−−−→ y ∈ G(S), the static analysis also derives
(9)
since different choices α ′ ∈ [α] and β ′ ∈ [β] yield the same
equivalence class, i.e., [α β] = [α ′ β ′]. Abstractly, Σ∗ is a semigroup, with sequencing as the semigroup operation; then,
Lemma C.5 shows the equivalence relation is compatible
with the semigroup operation, so the quotient Σ/∼ is a semigroup with semigroup operation (9).
For convenience, we let ϕ denote an element of the equivalence class of strings such that
□
In the remainder of the section, we introduce the technical
machinery that enables us to reason about “equivalence” of
the semantics of different sequences of statements. Then, we
describe how we prove Propositions C.2 & C.3. Finally, we
reduce Theorem 4.2 to Theorem C.4.
C.3
γ
o 99K v 99K w 99K x,
Lemma C.5. If [α] = [α ′] and [β] = [β ′], then [α β] =
[α ′ β ′].
Transfer
derives its conclusion, i.e., z 1 −−−−−−→ w k ∈ G(S). Therefore,
we have
o −−−−−−→ y ∈ G(S), so the result follows.
δ
the first results in x ,→ o if and only if the second does. For
example, [Assign Assign] = [Assign].
Then, equivalence is compatible with sequencing:
Transfer
FlowsTo
α
o 99K v 99K w 99K x,
path specifications, i.e., x −−−−−−→ y ∈ G(S). By Proposition C.2, we conclude that (7) is in S. Furthermore, by Proposition C.3, the premise of (7) holds, so the static analysis
New
(8)
In other words, α can be used interchangeably with β in
any string without affecting whether the string is contained
in L(C pt ). We use [α] = {β ∈ Σ∗ | α ∼ β } to denote the
equivalence class of α ∈ Σ∗ . Then, [α] = [β] if for any two
paths
Transfer
of the path specification (7), i.e., z 1 −−−−−−→ w k ∈ G(S). In
summary, we have the following result:
Transfer
equivalence classes
.
[α] ⊆ Σ∗
In particular, α, β ∈ Σ∗ are equivalent if
Therefore, we can conclude that when running the static
analysis using path specifications, we derive the conclusion
Transfer
=
Equivalent Semantics
for all γ , δ ∈ Σ∗ , γ ϕδ < L(C pt ).
Proving Propositions C.2 & C.3 requires reasoning about the
equivalence of the semantics of sequences of statements in P.
For example, to prove Proposition C.2, we show that each α i
(10)
In other words, [ϕ] describes sequences of statements that
can never be completed to a valid flows-to path.
20
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
C.4
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
1. By Lemma C.7, we can write α = γ σ βτδ , where (σ , τ ) ∈
∆prog and β ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib )∗ , such that
Proofs of Propositions C.2 & C.3
Now, we describe how to prove that under the conditions
of Proposition C.2, [α i ] = [α̃ i ], which suffices to prove the
proposition. We focus on the case α̃ i = Assign; the other
cases are similar. We need the following technical lemma
(we give a proof in Appendix D.1):
γ
With this lemma, since α̃ i = Assign, wmi = rmi and
αi
zmi +1 = pmi , so the path wmi 99K zmi +1 has form
This procedure must terminate, since α has finitely many
pairs of store and load statements. Theorem 4.2 follows. □
Assign
wmi = rmi −−−−−→ yi 99K x i+1 −−−−−→ pmi +1 = zmi +1 ,
D
where α i = Assign α i′ Assign. By Lemma C.6,
D.1
Since (New α) ∈ L(C pt ), we cannot have [α i ] = [ϕ], so
Proof of Lemma C.6
We first show the following lemma, which completely characterizes the subgroupoid of elements Σ∗free ⊆ Σ∗ :
[α i ] = [Assign] = [α̃ i ],
Lemma D.1. We have
as claimed. We have also proven the claim in Proposition C.3
∗
that Ai ⇒
= α i (with Ai = Transfer) also follows. The other
claims in Propositions C.2 & C.3 follow similarly. □
[Assign] [Assign] = [Assign]
[Assign] [Assign] = [ϕ]
[Assign] [Assign] = [ϕ]
Reduction of Theorem 4.2 to Theorem C.4
To handle field accesses, we use the fact that pairs of terminals (Store[f ], Load[f ]) and (Load[f ], Store[f ]) in strings
α ∈ L(C pt ) are matching. Therefore, can identify an innermost nested pair (σ , τ ) such that the string β between σ
and τ contains no field accesses, i.e., β ∈ Σfree . Furthermore,
by Assumption C.1, library field accesses and program field
accesses do not match one another. In particular, the set of
matching program field accesses is
Ø
∆prog =
{(Store[f ], Load[f ]), (Load[f ], Store[f ])}.
[Assign] [Assign] = [Assign]
[Assign] [New New] = [ϕ]
[New New] [Assign] = [New New]
[Assign] [New New] = [Assign]
[New New] [Assign] = [ϕ]
[New New] [New New] = [ϕ].
Proof. We show the first relation; the others follow similarly. First, we show that if γ Assign δ ∈ L(C pt ), then
γ Assign Assignδ ∈ L(C pt ). There must exist a derivation
f ∈ Fprog
Lemma C.7. For any α ∈ L(C pt ), either α ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib )∗ ,
or there exists a pair of terminals (σ , τ ) ∈ ∆prog such that
α = γ σ βτδ , where γ , δ ∈ Σ∗ and β ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib )∗ .
FlowsTo ⇒ ... ⇒ Transfer uδ
⇒ Transfer Assign uδ
The next step is to characterize [σ βτ ]:
Lemma C.8. For any (σ , τ ) ∈ ∆prog and β ∈ (Σfree ∪ Σlib
Proof of Technical Lemmas
We prove the technical lemmas used in Appendix C.
[α i ] = [Assign] [α i′] [Assign] ∈ {[Assign], [ϕ]}.
C.5
δ
Alias
˜ therefore,
4. By Theorem 4.2, we have w −−−→ t ∈ G(S);
Transfer
˜ as well.
v 999999K u ∈ G(S)
5. Recursively apply the procedure to α ′ = γ Assign δ .
[Assign] [α] [Assign] ∈ {[Assign], [ϕ]}.
α i′
τ
2. By Lemma C.8, [σ ] [β] [τ ] = [Assign].
3. By Lemma C.9, [β] = [New New].
Lemma C.6. For any α ∈ Σ∗free , we have
Assign
β
σ
y 99K v −
→ w 99K t →
− u 99K x .
⇒ ...
⇒ γ Assign δ
)∗ ,
since the only production in C pt containing the terminal
symbol Assign is Transfer → Transfer Assign. Therefore,
the following derivation also exists:
[σ ] [β] [τ ] ∈ {[Assign], [ϕ]}.
Finally, β must be an aliasing relation:
Lemma C.9. For any β ∈ Σ∗ ,
FlowsTo ⇒ ... ⇒ Transfer δ
[Store[f ]] [β] [Load[f ]] = [Assign] ⇒ [β] = [New New]
⇒ Transfer Assign uδ
[Load[f ]] [β] [Store[f ]] = [Assign] ⇒ [β] = [New New].
⇒ Transfer Assign Assign uδ
⇒ ...
Now, if α ∈ Σ∗free , we are done. Otherwise, putting the
three lemmas together, we perform the following procedure:
⇒ γ Assign Assign δ,
21
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Osbert Bastani, Rahul Sharma, Alex Aiken, and Percy Liang
i.e., γ Assign Assign δ ∈ L(C pt ). By a similar argument, it
follows that if γ Assign Assign δ ∈ L(C pt ), then γ Assign δ ∈
L(C pt ), so [Assign] [Assign] = [Assign].
□
Proof. Suppose that γ Store[f ] New New Load[f ] δ ∈ L(C pt ).
Then, we must have derivation
FlowsTo ⇒ ... ⇒ uγ Transfer uδ
⇒ uγ Store[f ] Alias Load[f ] uδ
It follows directly that if α ∈ Σ∗free , then
⇒ ...
[α] ∈ {[ϕ], [ϵ], [Assign], [Assign], [New New]}.
⇒ γ Store[f ] α Load[f ] δ,
In particular, for α ′ ∈ Σ∗free , [Assign] [α ′] ∈ {[Assign], [ϕ]},
so the lemma follows by taking α ′ = α Assign. □
D.2
so we also have derivation
FlowsTo ⇒ ... ⇒ uγ Transfer uδ
Proof of Lemma C.7
⇒ uγ Assign uδ
If we replace the terminal symbols σ ∈ Σfree with ϵ in
C pt , then C pt is a parentheses matching grammar where
each “open parentheses” Store[f ] (resp., Load[f ]) must be
matched with a corresponding “closed parentheses” Load[f ]
(resp., Store[f ]). Also, by Assumption C.1, Σlib ∩ Σprog = ∅.
Now, we prove by induction on the length of α. The base
case α = ϵ is clear. If α ∈ Σ∗ does not contain a pair of
matched parentheses (Store[f ], Load[f ]) ∈ Σ2prog , then α ∈
(Σfree ∪ Σlib )∗ , so we are done. Otherwise, for any such pair
of matched parentheses, we can express α = γ σα ′τδ . By
induction, the lemma holds for α ′, so we can write α =
γ ′σ ′ β ′τ ′δ ′ as in the lemma. Therefore, we have
⇒ ...
⇒ γ Assign Load[f ] δ .
Thus, γ Assign δ ∈ L(C pt ). The converse follows similarly,
as does the second claim.
□
Lemma D.3. For any β ∈ Σ∗ \ {ϵ }, we have
[β] = [Assign] ⇔ β ∈ L(C pt , Transfer)
[β] = [Assign] ⇔ β ∈ L(C pt , Transfer)
[β] = [New New] ⇔ β ∈ L(C pt , Alias).
Proof. We first show the forward implication. If [β] = [Assign],
then New Assign ∈ L(C pt ), so New β ∈ L(C pt ). Therefore,
there must exist a derivation
α = (γ σγ )σ β (τ δ τδ ),
′
′ ′
′ ′
so the claim follows. □
D.3
FlowsTo ⇒ New Transfer ⇒ ... ⇒ New β,
Proof of Lemma C.8
so β ∈ L(C pt , Transfer). The other two cases follow similarly. Now, we show the backward implication. Suppose
that β ∈ L(C pt , Transfer). We prove by structural induction
on the derivation of β from Transfer. Since β , ϵ, β cannot have been produced by Transfer ⇒ ϵ. If β is produced
by Transfer → Transfer Assign, then β = β ′Assign, where
β ′ ∈ L(C pt , Transfer). By induction, [β ′] = [Assign], so
We show the case (σ , τ ) = (Store[f ], Load[f ]), where f ∈
Fprog ; the case (σ , τ ) = (Load[f ], Store[f ]) is similar. First,
suppose that γ σ βτδ ∈ L(C pt ). Then, there must exist a
derivation of form
FlowsTo ⇒ ... ⇒ uγ Transfer uδ
⇒ uγ Transfer σ Alias τ uδ
[β] = [β ′] [Assign] = [Assign] [Assign] = [Assign],
⇒ ...
where the last step follows from Lemma D.1. Next, if β is
produced using the production
⇒ γ σ βτδ,
so the following derivation exists:
Transfer → Transfer Store[f ] Alias Load[f ],
FlowsTo ⇒ ... ⇒ uγ Transfer uδ
then β = β ′ Store[f ] β ′′ Load[f ], where β ′ ∈ L(C pt , Transfer)
and β ′′ ∈ L(C pt , Alias). By induction, [β ′] = [Assign] and
[β ′′] = [New New], so
⇒ uγ Transfer Assign uδ
⇒ ...
⇒ γ Assign δ .
β = [β ′] [Store[f ]] [β ′′] [Load[f ]]
The converse follows similarly, so the claim follows. □
= [Assign] [Store[f ]] [New New] [Load[f ]]
D.4
= [Assign],
Proof of Lemma C.9
where the last step follows from Lemma D.2 and Lemma D.1.
The remaining cases follow similarly.
□
We show two preliminary lemmas.
Lemma D.2. We have
[Store[f ]] [New New] [Load[f ]] = [Assign]
Now, suppose that [Store[f ]] [β] [Load[f ]] = [Assign]. Since
[Load[f ]] [New New] [Store[f ]] = [Assign].
New Store[f ] New New Load[f ] ∈ L(C pt ),
22
Active Learning of Points-To Specifications
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
• Case Ai = Transfer: Then, w i is a return value and
zi+1 is a parameter. Then, the unit test synthesis algorithm assigns the return value of mi to the argument
of mi+1 , i.e., the edges
we have
New Store[f ] β Load[f ] ∈ L(C pt ),
so the following derivation must exist:
FlowsTo ⇒ New Store[f ] Alias Load[f ]
Assign
⇒ ...
where G is the graph extracted from P. Therefore, we
⇒ New Store[f ] β Load[f ],
Transfer
have (w i −−−−−−→ zi+1 ) ∈ G(P, ∅).
• Case Ai = Transfer: This case is analogous to the
case A = Transfer.
• Case Ai = Alias: Then, w i and zi+1 are both parameters. Then, w i and zi+1 are both parameters. Then, the
unit test synthesis algorithm allocates a new object
and passes it as a parameter to each mi and mi+1 , i.e.,
the edges
i.e., β ∈ L(C pt , Alias). Finally, by Lemma D.3, we have [β] =
[New New]. The second case follows similarly. □
E
Proof of Correctness of Unit Test
Synthesis
In this section, we sketch a proof of Theorem 5.2, which says
that the unit tests synthesized by our algorithm are potential
witnesses.
E.1
Assign
w i −−−−−→ x −−−−−→ zi+1 ∈ G,
New
Assign
New
Assign
o −−−→ x −−−−−→ w i ∈ G and o −−−→ x −−−−−→ zi+1 ∈ G.
General Condition
Alias
Therefore, we have (w i −−−→ zi+1 ) ∈ G(P, ∅).
First, we establish a general condition for P to be a potential
witness:
Ai
Second, consider all edges w −−→ z, where w, z ∈ Vlib and
Ai ∈ {Transfer, Transfer, Alias}, that are contained in the
premise of s. By inspection, of the edges in G as described
above, the only additional edges in G(P, ∅) of this form are:
Proposition E.1. Let s be a path specification with premise
(e 1 ∈ G) ∧ ... ∧ (ek ∈ G). A program P is a potential witness
of s if the set of edges {e 1 , ..., ek } in the premise of s exactly
equals
w, z ∈ Vlib and
A
w−
→ z ∈ G(P, ∅)
.
A ∈ {Transfer, Transfer, Alias}
Transfer
Transfer
• The self-loops zi −−−−−−→ zi and w i −−−−−−→ w i (since
there is a production Transfer → ϵ in the points-to
grammar C pt ).
Ai
Proof. Let P be a potential witness for s, and suppose that the
conclusion of s is (e ∈ G). Let S be a set of path specifications
that computes e for P, i.e., e ∈ G(P, S). We need to show that
for any such S, S ∪ {s} is equivalent to S. Clearly, S ∪ {s} has
higher or equal recall than S, so it suffices to show that it
also has higher or equal precision than S. Consider an arbitrary program P ′. Then, if s is used during the computation
G(P, S ∪ {s}), then at that point, the premise of s holds for
G, i.e., e 1 , ..., ek ∈ G. Since the graph for P is contained in
the graph for P ′, and our static analysis is monotone, we
have e ∈ G(P, S) ⊆ G(P ′, S), i.e., e is computed without s.
Thus, G(P ′, S ∪ {s}) = G(P ′, S), so S ∪ {s} equivalent to S as
claimed.
□
• The backward edges zi+1 −−→ w i , where we have Ai ∈
{Transfer, Transfer}).
If these edges were added to the premise of s for P, then
by Proposition E.1, we could conclude that P is a potential
witness of s. However, these edges are in G(P, S) for any
program P and any specifications S, so we can add them to
the premise of s without affecting its semantics. It follows
that if P is a witness for s ′, and s ′ is equivalent to s, then P
is a witness for s as well. Therefore, P is a witness for s as
claimed. □
E.2 Proof Sketch of Theorem 5.2
Let s = z 1 → w 1 d ... → zk d w k . Since the function calls
are treated as no-ops by the static analysis (according to the
definition of a potential witness), they do not add any edges
to the extracted graph G except for assignments to and from
parameters and return values. The only other edges in the
graph G extracted from P are those corresponding to the
allocation statements added to P in the initialization step.
First, we show that the edges in the premise of s are
contained in G(P, ∅). For an edge w i → zi+1 , there are
three possibilities—either Ai = Transfer, Ai = Transfer, or
Ai = Alias:
23
| 6cs.PL
|
Gayaz Khakimzyanov
Institute of Computational Technologies, Novosibirsk, Russia
Denys Dutykh
CNRS–LAMA, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, France
arXiv:1707.01301v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 5 Jul 2017
Oleg Gusev
Institute of Computational Technologies, Novosibirsk, Russia
Nina Shokina
Institute of Computational Technologies, Novosibirsk, Russia
Dispersive shallow water wave
modelling. Part II: Numerical
simulation on a globally flat space
arXiv.org / hal
Last modified: July 7, 2017
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling.
Part II: Numerical simulation on a globally
flat space
Gayaz Khakimzyanov, Denys Dutykh∗, Oleg Gusev, and Nina Yu. Shokina
Abstract. In this paper we describe a numerical method to solve numerically the weakly
dispersive fully nonlinear Serre–Green–Naghdi (SGN) celebrated model. Namely, our
scheme is based on reliable finite volume methods, proven to be very efficient for the
hyperbolic part of equations. The particularity of our study is that we develop an adaptive numerical model using moving grids. Moreover, we use a special form of the SGN
equations where non-hydrostatic part of pressure is found by solving a nonlinear elliptic
equation. Moreover, this form of governing equations allows to determine the natural form
of boundary conditions to obtain a well-posed (numerical) problem.
Key words and phrases: nonlinear dispersive waves; moving adaptive grids; finite volumes; conservative finite differences
MSC: [2010] 76B15 (primary), 76M12, 65N08, 65N06 (secondary)
PACS: [2010] 47.35.Bb (primary), 47.35.Fg (secondary)
Key words and phrases. nonlinear dispersive waves; non-hydrostatic pressure; moving adaptive grids;
finite volumes; conservative finite differences.
∗
Corresponding author.
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
3 / 66
Contents
1
Introduction
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2
Mathematical model
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1 Well-posedness conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Linear waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2 Conservative form of equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Intermediate conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.3 One-dimensional case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Boundary conditions on the elliptic part . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Unicity of the elliptic equation solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.4 Vector short-hand notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Flat bottom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.5 Linear dispersion relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3
Numerical method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.1 Adaptive mesh construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Initial grid generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Grid motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.2 The SGN equations on a moving grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.3 Predictor–corrector scheme on moving grids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Predictor step . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Corrector step . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Well-balanced property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.4 Numerical scheme for linearized equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Linear stability of the scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Discrete dispersion relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4
Numerical results
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
4.1 Solitary wave propagation over the flat bottom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Uniform grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Adaptive grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.2 Solitary wave/wall interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Wave action on the wall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.3 Solitary wave/bottom step interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.4 Wave generation by an underwater landslide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
5.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
5.2 Perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
A
Derivation of the non-hydrostatic pressure equation
B
Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
References
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
5 / 66
1. Introduction
In 1967 D. Peregrine derived the first two-dimensional Boussinesq-type system of
equations [117]. This model described the propagation of long weakly nonlinear waves
over a general non-flat bottom. From this landmark study the modern era of long wave
modelling started. On one hand researchers focused on the development of new models
and in parallel the numerical algorithms have been developed. We refer to [20] for a recent
‘reasoned’ review of this topic.
The present manuscript is the continuation of our series of papers devoted to the long
wave modelling. In the first part of this series we derived the so-called base model [92],
which encompasses a number of previously known models (but, of course, not all of nonlinear dispersive systems). The governing equations of the base model are
Ht + ∇ · [ HU ] = 0 ,
p̌
1 h
∇P
(HU )t + (ū · ∇)(HU )
=
∇h −
ūt + (ū · ∇)ū +
H
H
H
i
+ H(U · ∇) ū + HU ∇ · ū ,
(1.1)
(1.2)
def
where U := ū + U is the modified horizontal velocity and U = U (H, ū) is the
closure relation to be specified later. Depending on the choice of this variable various
models can be obtained (see [92, Section §2.4]). Variables P and p̌ are related to the
fluid pressure. The physical meaning of these variables is reminded below in Section 2. In
the present paper we propose an adaptive numerical discretization for a particular, but
very popular nowadays model which can be obtained from the base model (1.1), (1.2).
Namely, if we choose U ≡ 0 (thus, U becomes the depth-averaged velocity u) then we
obtain equations equivalent to the celebrated Serre–Green–Naghdi (SGN) equations
[72, 126, 127] (rediscovered later independently by many other researchers). This system
will be the main topic of our numerical study. Most often, adaptive techniques for dispersive
wave equations involve the so-called Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) [121] (see also [15]
for nonlinear shallow water equations). The particularity of our study is that we conserve
the total number of grid points and the adaptivity is achieved by judiciously redistributing
them in space [83, 84]. The ideas of redistributing grid nodes is stemming from the works
of Bakhvalov [7], Il’in [85] and others [1, 134].
The base model (1.1), (1.2) admits an elegant conservative form [92]:
Ht + ∇ · [ HU ] = 0 ,
i
(H U )t + ∇ · Hū ⊗ U + P(H, ū) · I + H U ⊗ ū = p̌ ∇h ,
h
(1.3)
(1.4)
where I ∈ Mat 2 × 2 (R) is the identity matrix and the operator ⊗ denotes the tensorial
product. We note that the pressure function P(H, ū) incorporates the familiar hydrostatic
g H2
well-known from the Nonlinear Shallow Water Equations (NSWE)
pressure part
2
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
6 / 66
[11, 43]. By setting U ≡ 0 we obtain readily from (1.3), (1.4) the conservative form of
the SGN equations (one can notice that the mass conservation equation (1.1) was already
in conservative form).
Nonlinear dispersive wave equations represent certain numerical difficulties since they
involve mixed derivatives (usually of the horizontal velocity variable, but sometimes of the
total water depth as well) in space and time. These derivatives have to be approximated
numerically, thus leaving a lot of room for the creativity. Most often the so-called Method
Of Lines (MOL) is employed [97, 120, 123, 128], where the spatial derivatives are discretized
first and the resulting system of coupled Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) is then
approached with more or less standard ODE techniques, see e.g. [76, 77]. The MOL
separates the choice of time discretization from the procedure of discretization in space,
even if the interplay between two schemes might be important. For example, it would be
natural to choose the same order of accuracy for both schemes.
Let us review the available spatial discretization techniques employed in recent numerical studies. We focus essentially on fully nonlinear weakly dispersive models, even if
some interesting works devoted to Boussinesq-type and unidirectional equations will be
mentioned. First of all, dispersive wave equations with the dispersion relation given by a
rational function (à la BBM [14, 116]) usually involve the inversion of an elliptic operator. This gives the first idea of employing the splitting technique between the hyperbolic
and elliptic operators. This idea was successfully realized in e.g. [8, 9, 18, 82]. Historically, perhaps the finite difference techniques were applied first to dispersive (and more
general non-hydrostatic) wave equations [24, 35–37, 108, 109, 143, 147]. Then, naturally
we arrive to the development of continuous Galerkin/Finite Element type discretizations
[2, 17, 45, 47, 114, 131, 139]. See also a recent review [46] and references therein. Pseudospectral Fourier-type methods can also be successfully applied to the SGN equations [52].
See [62] for a pedagogical review of pseudo-spectral and radial basis function methods for
some shallow water equations. More recently, the finite volume type methods were applied
to dispersive equations [30, 52, 57, 58, 89, 100]. In the present study we also employ a
predictor–corrector finite volume type scheme [129], which is described in details below.
The present article is organized as follows. In Section 2 we present the governing equations in 2D and 1D spatial dimensions. The numerical method is described in Section 3.
Several numerical illustrations are shown in Section 4 including the solitary wave/wall
or bottom interactions and even a realistic underwater landslide simulation. Finally, in
Section 5 we outline the main conclusions and perspectives of the present study. In Appendices A we provide some details on analytical derivations used in this manuscript.
2. Mathematical model
In this study we consider the following system of the Serre–Green–Naghdi (SGN)
equations, which describes the incompressible homogeneous fluid flow in a layer bounded
from below by the impermeable bottom y = −h(x, t) and above by the free surface
7 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
l
y
O
α
η (x,t)
x
u(x,t)
d
h(x,t)
H(x,t)
Figure 1. Sketch of the fluid domain in 2D.
y = η (x, t), x = (x1 , x2 ) ∈ R2 :
Ht + ∇ · Hu = 0 ,
(2.1)
p̌
∇P
=
∇h ,
(2.2)
ut + (u · ∇) u +
H
H
where for simplicity we drop the bars over the horizontal velocity variable u(x, t) =
def
u1 (x, t), u2(x, t) . Function H(x, t) := h(x, t) + η(x, t) being the total water depth.
The sketch of the fluid domain is schematically depicted in Figure 1. For the derivation
of equations (2.1), (2.2) we refer to the first part of the present series of papers [92]. The
depth-integrated pressure P(u, H) is defined as
g H2
− ℘(x, t) ,
2
where ℘(x, t) is the non-hydrostatic part of the pressure:
def
P (u, H) :=
℘ (x, t)
def
:=
H2
H3
R1 +
R2 ,
3
2
(2.3)
with
def
def
R1 := D(∇ · u) − (∇ · u)2 ,
R2 := D 2 h ,
def
D := ∂t + u · ∇ .
Above, D is the total or material derivative operator. On the right hand side of equation
def
(2.2) we have the pressure trace at the bottom p̌ := p|y = −h , which can be written as
p̌ (x, t) = gH − ̺ (x, t) ,
where ̺(x, t) is again the non-hydrostatic pressure contribution:
def
̺ (x, t) :=
H2
R1 + H R2 .
2
(2.4)
8 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
Equations above are much more complex comparing to the classical NSWE (or SaintVenant equations) [43], since they contain mixed derivatives up to the third order. From
the numerical perspective these derivatives have to be approximated. However, the problem can be simplified if we ‘extract’ a second order sub-problem for the non-hydrostatic
component of the pressure. Indeed, it can be shown (see Appendix A) that function
℘(x, t) satisfies the following second order linear elliptic equation with variable coefficients (by analogy with incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, where the pressure is
found numerically by solving a Poisson-type problem [33, 79]):
∇h
2 Υ − 3
(∇℘ · ∇h) ∇h
∇℘
℘ = F , (2.5)
− 6
−
·
+ ∇·
∇·
H
HΥ
H3
Υ
H2 Υ
{z
}
|
(⋆)
def
where Υ := 4 + | ∇h |2 and F, R are defined as
R ∇h
6R
def
u
u
F := ∇ · g ∇η +
−
+ 2 (∇ · u) 2 − 2 1 x1 1 x2 ,
Υ
HΥ
u 2 x1 u 2 x2
def
R := −g ∇η · ∇h + (u · ∇)∇h · u + htt + 2 u · ∇ht .
(2.6)
(2.7)
Symbol | · | in (2.6) denotes the determinant of a 2 × 2 matrix.
Equation (2.5) is uniformly elliptic and it does not contain time derivatives of the fluid
velocity u. If the coefficient (⋆) is positive (for instance, it is the case for a flat bottom
h(x, t) ≡ const), we deal with a positive operator and stable robust discretizations can
be proposed. Taking into account the fact that equation (2.5) is linear with respect to
the variable ℘(x, t), its discrete counterpart can be solved by direct or iterative methods∗.
Well-posedness of this equation is discussed below (see Section 2.1). The boundary conditions for equation (2.5) will be discussed below in Section 2.3.1 (in 1D case only, the
generalization to 2D is done by projecting on the normal direction to the boundary).
Introduction of the variable ℘(x, t) allows to rewrite equation (2.2) in the following
equivalent form:
ut + (u · ∇)u + g ∇H = g ∇h +
∇℘ − ̺ ∇h
.
H
(2.8)
The non-hydrostatic pressure at the bottom ̺(x, t) can be expressed through ℘ in the
following way:
i
1 h 6℘
℘
̺(x, t) =
+ H R + ∇ · ∇h .
(2.9)
Υ H
The derivation of this equation (2.9) is given in Appendix A as well. So, thanks to this
relation (2.9), the usage of equation (2.4) is not necessary anymore. Once we found the
function ℘(x, t), we can compute the bottom component from (2.9).
∗In
our implementation we use the direct Thomas algorithm, since in 1D the resulting linear system
of equations is tridiagonal with the dominant diagonal.
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
9 / 66
Remark 1. It can be easily seen that taking formally the limit ℘ → 0 and ̺ → 0 of
vanishing non-hydrostatic pressures, allows us to recover the classical NSWE (or SaintVenant equations) [43]. Thus, the governing equations verify the Bohr correspondence
principle [16].
2.1. Well-posedness conditions
In order to obtain a well-posed elliptic problem (2.5), one has to ensure that coefficient
(⋆) is positive. This coefficient involves the bathymetry function h(x, t) and the total
water depth H(x, t). In other words, the answer depends on local depth and wave elevation.
It is not excluded that for some wave conditions the coefficient (⋆) may become negative.
In the most general case the positivity condition is trivial and, thus, not very helpful, i.e.
∇h
2 Υ − 3
(⋆) ≡
> 0.
(2.10)
·
+ ∇·
H3
Υ
H2 Υ
On the flat bottom h(x, t) → d = const we know that the above condition is satisfied
1
> 0. Consequently, by continuity of the coefficient (⋆)
since Υ → 4 and (⋆) →
2 H3
we conclude that the same property will hold for some (sufficiently small) variations of the
depth h(x, t), i.e. | ∇h | ≪ 1. In practice it can be verified that bathymetry variations
can be even finite so that condition (2.10) still holds.
Remark 2. It may appear that restrictions on the bathymetry variations are inherent to
our formulation only. However, it is the case of all long wave models, even if this assumption does not appear explicitly in the derivation. For instance, bottom irregularities will
inevitably generate short waves ( i.e. higher frequencies) during the wave propagation process. A priori, this part of the spectrum is not modeled correctly by approximate equations,
unless some special care is taken.
2.1.1 Linear waves
Let us take the limit of linear waves η → 0 in expression (⋆). It will become then
∇h
2 Υ − 3
def
⋆ ) :=
.
·
+
∇
·
(⋆) → (⋆
h3
Υ
h2 Υ
⋆ ) then takes the following form:
The positivity∗ condition of (⋆
2 Υ + h hx1 x1 1 − h2x1 + h2x2 + hx2 x2 1 + h2x1 − h2x2 − 4 hx1 hx2 hx1 x2 > 0 .
If we restrict our attention to the one-dimensional bathymetries (i.e. hx2 → 0), then we
obtain an even simpler condition:
2 1 + hx2
,
hxx > − ·
h 1 − hx2
∗Non-negativity,
to be more precise.
10 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
where by x we denote x1 for simplicity. The last condition can be easily checked at the
problem outset. A further simplification is possible if we additionally assume that
| ∇h | ≡ | hx | < 1 ,
(2.11)
2
hxx > − .
h
(2.12)
then we have the following elegant condition:
2.2. Conservative form of equations
Equations (2.1), (2.2) admit an elegant conservative form, which is suitable for numerical
simulations:
Ht + ∇ · Hu = 0 ,
(2.13)
(Hu)t + ∇ · F = g H ∇h + ∇℘ − ̺∇h ,
(2.14)
where the flux matrix F (H, u) is the same as in NSWE (or Saint-Venant equations):
g H2
2
H u1 · u2
def H u1 +
2
.
F (H, u) :=
g H2
H u1 · u2
H u22 +
2
Notice that it is slightly different from the (fully-)conservative form given in Part I [92].
Conservative equations∗ (2.13), (2.14) can be supplemented by the energy conservation
equation which can be used to check the accuracy of simulation (in conservative case, i.e.
ht ≡ 0) and/or to estimate the energy of generated waves [54]:
h
Pi
= −p̌ ht ,
(2.15)
(H E )t + ∇ · H u E +
H
where the total energy E is defined as
g
def
(H − 2h) .
E := 12 | u | 2 + 61 H 2 (∇ · u)2 + 21 H (Dh) (∇ · u) + 21 (Dh)2 +
2
Notice that equation (2.15) is not independent. It is a differential consequence of the mass
and momentum conservations (2.13), (2.14) (as it is the case for incompressible flows in
general).
2.2.1 Intermediate conclusions
As a result, the system of nonlinear dispersive equations (2.1), (2.2) was split in two
main parts:
(1) Governing equations (2.13), (2.14) in the form of (hyperbolic) balance laws with
source terms
∗It
is not difficult to see that the mass conservation equation (2.1) is already in a conservative form in
the SGN model. Thus, equations (2.1) and (2.13) are obviously identical.
11 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
(2) A scalar nonlinear elliptic equation to determine the non-hydrostatic part of the
pressure ℘(x, t) (and consequently ̺(x, t) as well)
This splitting idea will be exploited below in the numerical algorithm in order to apply the
most suitable and robust algorithm for each part of the solution process [9].
2.3. One-dimensional case
In this study for the sake of simplicity we focus on the two-dimensional physical problem,
i.e. one horizontal and one vertical dimensions. The vertical flow structure being resolved
using the asymptotic expansion (see Part I [92] of this series of papers), thus we deal with
def
PDEs involving one spatial (horizontal) dimension (x := x1 ) and one temporal variable
t ∈ R+ . The horizontal velocity variable u(x, t) becomes a scalar function in this case.
Below we provide the full set of governing equations (which follow directly from (2.13),
(2.14) and (2.5)):
Ht + [ H u ]x = 0 ,
h
g H2 i
= g H hx +
(H u)t + H u2 +
2 x
h h i
℘x
2 Υ − 3
x
℘ = F,
− 6
4
·
+
HΥ x
H3
Υ
H2 Υ x
(2.16)
℘x
− ̺ hx ,
(2.17)
(2.18)
def
where Υ := 4 + h2x and
def
F :=
def
R hx
gηx +
Υ
x
−
6R
+ 2 u2x ,
HΥ
R := −g ηx hx + u2 hxx + htt + 2 u hxt .
The last equations can be trivially obtained from corresponding two-dimensional versions
given in (2.6), (2.7). This set of equations will be solved numerically below (see Section 3).
2.3.1 Boundary conditions on the elliptic part
First, we rewrite elliptic equation (2.18) in the following equivalent form:
K ℘x x − K0 ℘ = F ,
where
(2.19)
h 2 Υ − 3
h i
4
def
x
.
,
K0 := 6
+
3
2
HΥ
H
Υ
H Υ x
We assume that we have to solve an initial-boundary value problem for the system (2.16)–
(2.18). If we have a closed numerical wave tank∗ (as it is always the case in laboratory
def
K :=
∗Other
possibilities have to be discussed separately.
12 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
experiments), then on vertical walls the horizontal velocity satisfies:
∀t ∈ R+ .
u(x, t) |x = 0 = u(x, t) |x = ℓ ≡ 0,
For the situation where the same boundary condition holds on both boundaries, we introduce a short-hand notation:
=ℓ
u(x, t) |xx =
0 ≡ 0,
∀t ∈ R+ .
Assuming that equation (2.8) is valid up to the boundaries, we obtain the following boundary conditions for the elliptic equation (2.18):
x=ℓ
℘ − ̺h
x
x
− g ηx
= 0,
∀t ∈ R+ .
H
x=0
Or in terms of equation (2.19) we equivalently have:
x=ℓ
R hx
6 hx ℘
=
g
η
+
K℘ x −
x
H 2Υ
Υ
x=0
x=ℓ
,
x=0
∀t ∈ R+ .
(2.20)
The boundary conditions for the non-hydrostatic pressure component ℘ are of the 3rd
kind (sometimes they are referred to as of Robin-type). For the case where locally at the
=ℓ
boundaries the bottom is flat (to the first order), i.e. hx |xx =
0 ≡ 0, then we have the
nd
(non-homogeneous) Neumann boundary condition of the 2 kind:
=ℓ
K℘x |x = 0 = g ηx |xx =
0 ,
x=ℓ
∀t ∈ R+ .
For a classical Poisson-type equation this condition would not be enough to have a wellposed problem. However, we deal rather with a Helmholtz-type equation (if K0 > 0).
So, the flat bottom does not represent any additional difficulty for us and the unicity of
the solution can be shown in this case as well.
2.3.2 Unicity of the elliptic equation solution
The mathematical structure of equation (2.19) is very advantageous since it allows to
show the following
Theorem 1. Suppose that the Boundary Value Problem (BVP) (2.20) for equation (2.19)
admits a solution and the following conditions are satisfied:
K0 > 0,
then this solution is unique.
hx |x = 0 > 0,
hx |x = ℓ 6 0 ,
(2.21)
Proof. Assume that there are two such solutions ℘1 and ℘2 . Then, their difference
def
℘ :=
℘1 − ℘2 satisfies the following homogeneous BVP:
K ℘x x − K0 ℘ = 0 ,
(2.22)
x=ℓ
6 hx ℘
℘
= 0.
(2.23)
K x −
H 2Υ
x=0
13 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
Let us multiply the first equation (2.22) by ℘ and integrate over the computational domain:
ˆ ℓ
ˆ ℓ
2
K ℘x x ℘ dx −
K0 ℘ dx = 0 .
0
|0
{z
}
()
Integration by parts of the first integral () yields:
ˆ ℓ
ˆ ℓ
x=ℓ
2
2
K ℘x ℘|
− K ℘x ℘|x = 0 −
K ℘x dx −
K0 ℘ dx = 0 .
0
0
And using boundary conditions (2.23) we finally obtain:
ˆ ℓ
ˆ ℓ
x=ℓ
6 hx
6 hx
2
2
2
2
℘
℘
−
−
K ℘x dx −
K0 ℘ dx = 0 .
H 2Υ
H 2Υ
0
0
x=0
Taking into account this Theorem assumptions (2.21) and the fact that K > 0, the last
identity leads to a contradiction, since the left hand side is strictly negative. Consequently,
the solution to equation (2.19) with boundary condition (2.20) is unique.
Remark 3. Conditions in Theorem 1 are quite natural. The non-negativity of coefficient
K0 has already been discussed in Section 2.1. Two other conditions mean that the water
depth is increasing in the offshore direction (hx |x = 0 > 0) and again it is decreasing
( hx |x = ℓ 6 0) when we approach the opposite shore.
2.4. Vector short-hand notation
For the sake of convenience we shall rewrite governing equations (2.16), (2.17) in the
following vectorial form:
v t + F (v) x = G (v, ℘, ̺, h) ,
(2.24)
where we introduced the following vector-valued functions:
!
Hu
def
def
H
v :=
,
F (v) := 2
g H2 ,
Hu
Hu +
2
and the source term is defined as
!
def
0
G (v, ℘, ̺, h) :=
.
g H hx + ℘x − ̺hx
The point of view that we adopt in this study is to view the SGN equations as a system of
hyperbolic equations (2.24) with source terms G (v, ℘x , ̺, h). Obviously, one has to solve
also the elliptic equation (2.18) in order to compute the source term G .
The Jacobian matrix of the advection operator coincides with that of classical NSWE
equations:
!
def dF (v)
0
1
A (v) :=
=
.
dv
−u2 + g H 2u
14 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
Eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix A (v) can be readily computed:
def p
λ− = u − s ,
λ+ = u + s ,
s :=
gH.
(2.25)
The Jacobian matrix appears naturally in the non-divergent form of equations (2.24):
v t + A (v) · v x = G ,
(2.26)
By multiplying both sides of the last equation by A (v) we obtain the equations for the
advection flux function F (v):
Ft + A (v) · Fx = A · G .
(2.27)
In order to study the characteristic form of equations one needs also to know the matrix
of left and right eigenvectors correspondingly:
!
!
1
def
def s
−1
1
−λ+ 1
L := 2
.
(2.28)
,
R :=
s
2 −λ− λ+
−λ− 1
If we introduce also the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues
!
def
λ− 0
Λ :=
,
0 λ+
the following relations can be easily checked:
R·Λ·L ≡ A ,
R·L = L ·R ≡ I,
where I is the identity 2 × 2 matrix.
2.4.1 Flat bottom
Equations above become particularly simple on the flat bottom. In this case the bathymetry
functions is constant, i.e.
h(x, t) ≡ d = const > 0 .
Substituting it into governing equations above, we straightforwardly obtain:
Ht + [ H u ]x = 0 ,
h
g H2 i
2
(H u)t + H u +
= ℘x ,
2 x
℘x
3 ℘
−
= g ηxx + 2 u2x .
H x
H3
15 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
Solitary wave solution. Equations above admit an elegant analytical solution known as the
solitary wave ∗. It is given by the following expressions:
√
3αg
υ · η(x, t)
2
η(x, t) = α · sech
u(x, t) =
x − x0 − υ t ,
, (2.29)
2dυ
d + η(x, t)
where α is the wave amplitude, x0 ∈ R is the initial wave position and υ is the velocity
defined as
def p
υ :=
g (d + α) .
The non-hydrostatic pressure under the solitary wave can be readily computed as well:
℘(x, t) = g H 2 (x, t) − d 2 − d υ u(x, t) .
2
One can derive also periodic travelling waves known as cnoidal waves. For their expressions we refer to e.g. [52, 55].
2.5. Linear dispersion relation
The governing equations (2.16)–(2.18) after linearizations take the following form:
ηt + d ux = 0 ,
ut + g ηx =
℘xx
def
where c :=
form
√
−
3
d2
℘
℘x
d
,
= c2 ηxx ,
g d is the linear gravity wave speed. By looking for plane wave solutions of
η(x, t) = α ei (kx
− ω t)
u(x, t) = υ ei (kx
− ω t)
,
℘(x, t)
= ρ ei (kx
− ω t)
,
where k is the wave number, ω(k) is the wave frequency and α, υ, ρ ∈ R are some (constant) real amplitudes. The necessary condition for the existence of plane wave solutions
reads
ck
ω(k) = ± r
.
(2.30)
(kd)2
1 +
3
2π
into the last formula and dividing both sides by
By substituting the definition of k =
λ
k we obtain the relation between the phase speed cp and the wavelength λ:
c
def ω k(λ)
.
= r
cp (λ) :=
k λ
4π 2 d 2
1 +
3λ2
∗Solitary
,
waves are to be distinguished from the so-called solitons which interact elastically [48]. Since
the SGN equations are not integrable (for the notion of integrability we refer to e.g. [145]), the interaction
of solitary waves is inelastic [114].
16 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
This dispersion relation is accurate to 2nd order at the limit of long waves kd → 0. There
are many other nonlinear dispersive wave models which share the same linear dispersion
relation, see e.g. [61, 64, 117, 149]. However, their nonlinear properties might be very
different.
3. Numerical method
The construction of numerical schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws on moving grids
was described in our previous work [94]. In the present manuscript we make an extension
of this technology to dispersive PDEs illustrated on the example of the SGN equations
(2.16)–(2.18). The main difficulty which arises in the dispersive case is handling of high
order (possibly mixed) derivatives. The SGN system is an archetype of such systems
with sufficient degree of nonlinearity and practically important applications in Coastal
Engineering [96].
3.1. Adaptive mesh construction
In the present work we employ the method of moving grids initially proposed in early
60’s by Tikhonov & Samarskii [135, 136] and developed later by Bakhvalov (1969) [7]
and Il’in (1969) [85]. This technology was recently described by the authors to steady [90]
and unsteady [94] problems. For more details we refer to our recent publications [90, 94].
An alternative recent approach can be found in e.g. [3, 4]. In the present Section we just
recall briefly the main steps of the method.
The main idea consists in assuming that there exists a (time-dependent) diffeomorphism
def
from the reference domain Q := [0, 1] to the computational domain I = [0, ℓ]:
x(q, t) : Q 7→ I .
It is natural to assume that boundaries of the domains correspond to each other, i.e.
x(0, t) = 0 ,
x(1, t) = ℓ ,
∀t > 0 .
We shall additionally assume that the Jacobian of this map is bounded from below and
above
def ∂x
0 < m 6 J(q, t) :=
6 M < +∞
(3.1)
∂q
by some real constants m and M.
The construction of this diffeomorphism x(q, t) is the heart of the matter in the moving
grid method. We employ the so-called equidistribution method. The required non-uniform
grid Ih of the computational domain I is then obtained as the image of the uniformly
distributed nodes Qh under the mapping x(q, t):
xj = x(qj , t) ,
qj = j ∆q ,
∆q =
1
,
N
17 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
where N is the total number of grid points. Notice, that strictly speaking, we do not even
need to know the mapping x(q, t) in other points besides {qj }N
j=0 . Under condition (3.1)
it easily follows that the maximal discretization step in the physical space vanishes when
we refine the mesh in the reference domain Qh :
max | xj+1 − xj | 6 M ∆q → 0 ,
j=0 ... ,N −1
as
∆q → 0 .
3.1.1 Initial grid generation
Initially, the desired mapping x(q, 0) is obtained as a solution to the following nonlinear
elliptic problem
d
dx
̟(x)
= 0,
x(0) = 0, x(1) = ℓ ,
(3.2)
dq
dq
where we drop in this Section the 2nd constant argument 0. The function ̟(x) is the
so-called monitor function. Its choice will be specified below, but we can say that this
functions has to be positive defined and bounded from below, i.e.
̟(x) > C > 0 ,
∀x ∈ R .
In practice the lower bound C is taken for simplicity to be equal to 1. A popular choice of
the monitor function is, for example,
ϑ0 ∈ R+ ,
̟[η](x) = 1 + ϑ0 | η | ,
where η is the free surface elevation. Another possibility consists in taking into account
the free surface gradient:
ϑ1 ∈ R+ ,
̟[η](x) = 1 + ϑ1 | ηx | ,
or even both effects:
̟[η](x) = 1 + ϑ0 | η | + ϑ1 | ηx | ,
ϑ0,1 ∈ R+ .
In some simple cases equation (3.2) can be solved analytically (see e.g. [90]). However,
in most cases we have to solve the nonlinear elliptic problem (3.2) numerically. For this
purpose we use an iterative scheme, where at every stage we have a linear three-diagonal
problem to solve:
1
∆q
(n+1)
(n)
̟(xj+1/2 )
xj+1
(n+1)
− xj
∆q
(n+1)
−
(n)
̟(xj−1/2 )
xj
(n+1)
− xj−1
∆q
= 0,
n ∈ N0 .
(3.3)
The iterations are continued until the convergence is achieved to the prescribed tolerance
parameter (typically ∝ 10−10 ).
18 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
3.1.2 Grid motion
In unsteady computations the grid motion is given by the following nonlinear parabolic
equation:
∂
∂x
∂x
̟(x, t)
= β
,
β ∈ R+ .
(3.4)
∂q
∂q
∂t
The parameter β plays the rôle of the diffusion coefficient here. It is used to control the
smoothness of nodes trajectories. Equation (3.4) is discretized using an implicit scheme:
n+1
xn+1
− xnj
xn+1
xn+1
− xn+1
1
j
j+1 − xj
j
j−1
n
n
̟j+1/2
= β
− ̟j−1/2
,
(3.5)
∆q
∆q
∆q
τ
with boundary conditions xn+1
= 0, xn+1
= ℓ as above. We would like to reiterate
0
N
that at every time step we solve only one additional (tridiagonal) linear system. Nonlinear
iterative computations are performed only once when we project the initial condition on
the ad-hoc non-uniform grid. So, the additional overhead due to the mesh motion is linear
in complexity, i.e. O(N).
Similarly to the elliptic case (3.2), equation (3.4) admits smooth solutions provided that
the monitor function ̟(x, t) is bounded from below by a positive constant. In numerical examples shown below we always take monitor functions which satisfy the condition
̟(x, t) > 1, ∀x ∈ I , ∀t > 0 . Thus, for any t > 0 equation (3.4) provides us the
required diffeomorphism between the reference domain Q and the computational domain
I.
3.2. The SGN equations on a moving grid
Before discretizing the SGN equations (2.16)–(2.18), we have to pose them on the reference domain Q. The composed functions will be denoted as:
def
ů(q, t) := (u ◦ x) (q, t) ≡ u x(q, t), t .
def
And we introduce similar notations for all other variables, e.g. H̊(q, t) := H x(q, t), t .
The conservative (2.24) and non-conservative (2.26), (2.27) forms of hyperbolic equations
read:
˚ − xt v̊
(Jv̊)t + F
= G˚,
(3.6)
q
1 ˚
1 ˚
Fq − xt v̊ q =
G,
v̊ t +
J
J
˚t + 1 A˚· F
˚q − xt v̊ q = 1 A˚· G˚,
F
J
J
where the terms on the right-hand sides are defined similarly as above:
!
0
def
G˚ :=
.
˚ − ˚
g H̊ h̊q + ℘
̺ h̊q
q
(3.7)
(3.8)
19 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
The non-hydrostatic pressure on the bottom is computed in Q space as:
˚
˚ h̊
℘
h̊q2
6℘
def 1
def
q q
˚
̺ :=
+ H̊ R̊ +
,
Υ̊
:=
4
+
J2
J2
Υ̊
H̊
(3.9)
Finally, we just have to specify the expression for R̊:
i
η̊q h̊q
ů 2 h h̊q i
xt
2 ů − xt h
xt
def
R̊ := −g 2 +
+ h̊t −
h̊q
h̊q .
· h̊t −
+
J
J
J q
J
J
J
t
q
We have to specify also the equations which allow us to find the non-hydrostatic part of
˚ . Equation (2.19) posed on the reference domain Q reads:
the pressure field ℘
˚
˚ = F̊ ,
K̊ ℘q q − K̊0 ℘
(3.10)
where the coefficients and the right-hand side are defined as
h̊
2 J Υ̊ − 3
4
def
def
q
·
+
,
,
K̊0 := 6
K̊ :=
Υ̊
H̊ 3
J H̊ Υ̊
J H̊ 2 Υ̊ q
h η̊
ůq2
R̊ h̊q i
6 R̊ J
def
q
F̊ := g
−
+
+ 2
.
J
J
J Υ̊ q
H̊ Υ̊
Finally, the boundary conditions are specified now at q = 0 and q = 1. For the hyperbolic
part of the equations they are
ů(0, t) = 0
ů(1, t) = 0
∀t > 0 .
For the elliptic part we have the following mixed-type boundary conditions:
q=1
q=1
R̊
1
4 ℘
˚
˚ − 6 h̊q ℘
.
gη̊q +
h̊q
=
q
J
Υ̊
J H̊ Υ̊
J H̊ 2 Υ̊
q=0
q=0
(3.11)
3.3. Predictor–corrector scheme on moving grids
In this Section we describe the numerical finite volume discretization of the SGN equations on a moving grid. We assume that the reference domain Q is discretized with a
def
N
uniform grid Qh := qj = j ∆q j = 0 , with the uniform spacing ∆q = N1 . Then, the
grid Inh in the physical domain I at every time instance t = t n > 0 is given by the image of
the uniform grid Qh under the mapping x(q, t) , i.e. xnj = x(qj , t n ) , j = 0, 1, . . . , N or
def
N
simply Inh = x(Qh , t n ). We assume that we know the discrete solution∗ v̊ ♯n := v̊ jn j = 0 ,
def ˚ n N
˚ n :=
℘
℘j j = 0 at the current time t = tn and we already constructed the non-uniform
♯
def
N
grid xn+1
:= xn+1
at the following time layer t n+1 using the equidistribution method
j
♯
j =0
described above. We remind that the non-uniform grid at the following layer is constructed
based only on the knowledge of v̊ ♯n .
∗With
symbol ♯ we denote the set of solution values at discrete spatial grid nodes.
20 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
3.3.1 Predictor step
In the nonlinear case, during the predictor step the hyperbolic part of equations is solved
two times:
def
N −1
• First, using equation (3.7) we compute the discrete solution values v̊ ∗♯, c := v̊ ∗j+1/2 j = 0
def
N −1
in the cell centers Qh, c := qj+1/2 = qj + ∆q
.
2 j =0
• Then, using equation (3.8) we compute the values of the flux vector equally in the
def
N −1
˚∗
˚∗ :=
.
F
cell centers F
♯, c
j+1/2 j = 0
We rewrite equations (3.7), (3.8) in the characteristic form by multiplying them on the left
by the matrix L̊ (of left eigenvectors of the Jacobian A˚):
1
˚q − xt v̊ q = 1 L̊ · G˚,
L̊ · F
J
J
1
˚t +
˚q − xt v̊ q = 1 Λ̊ · L̊ · G˚,
L̊ · F
Λ̊ · L̊ · F
J
J
L̊ · v̊ t +
The discretization of last equations reads:
1
n
1
n
v̊ ∗j+1/2 − v̊ nj+1/2
˚q − xt v̊ q
,
=
L̊ · F
L̊ · G˚
+
τ /2
J
J
j+1/2
j+1/2
(3.12)
˚∗
˚n
n
1
1
F
n
n
j+1/2 − Fj+1/2
−1
˚
˚
Λ̊ · L̊ · Fq − xt v̊ q
Λ̊ · L̊ · G
+
,
=
D · L̊ j+1/2 ·
τ /2
J
J
j+1/2
j+1/2
(3.13)
D−1 · L̊
n
·
j+1/2
where τ is the time step, L̊nj+1/2 is an approximation of matrix L̊ in the cell centers Qh, c (it
will be specified below). The matrix D is composed of cell parameters for each equation:
!
!
1, n
−, n
1
+
θ
0
1
+
λ
0
def
def
j+1/2
j+1/2
n
n
Dj+1/2
:=
,
Λ̊j+1/2
:=
,
2, n
n
0
1 + θj+1/2
0
1 + λ+,
j+1/2
n
with λ±,
j+1/2 being the approximations of eigenvalues (2.25) in the cell centers Qh, c (it will
be specified below). On the right-hand side the source term is
!
0
def
n
n
G˚j+1/2
:=
,
˚ − ˚
g H̊ h̊q + ℘
̺
h̊
q
q
j+1/2
where derivatives with respect to q are computed using central differences:
n
˚
℘
q, j+1/2
def
:=
˚n
℘
j+1
˚n
− ℘
j
,
∆q
def
h̊nq, j+1/2 :=
h̊nj+1 − h̊nj
.
∆q
21 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
n
The value of the non-hydrostatic pressure trace at the bottom ˚
̺j+1/2
is computed according
˚n in cell centers are computed as:
to formula (3.9). Solution vector v̊ n and the fluxes F
♯, c
♯, c
˚n
˚n
+
def Fj+1 + Fj
˚n
:=
,
F
.
j+1/2
2
2
The derivatives of these quantities are estimated using simple finite differences:
n
n
˚n
˚n
def Fj+1 − Fj
def v̊ j+1 − v̊ j
˚n
:=
,
F
.
v̊ nq, j+1/2 :=
q, j+1/2
∆q
∆q
Finally, we have to specify the computation of some mesh-related quantities:
def
v̊ nj+1/2 :=
xnt, j
xn+1
− xnj
j
,
:=
τ
def
v̊ nj+1
v̊ nj
def
xnt, j+1/2 :=
xnt, j + xnt, j
,
2
def
Jnj+1/2 ≡ xnq, j+1/2 :=
xnj+1 − xnj
.
∆q
n
The approximation of the matrix of left eigenvectors L̊nj+1/2 and eigenvalues λ±,
j+1/2 depends
on the specification of the Jacobian matrix A˚n . Our approach consists in choosing the
j+1/2
discrete approximation in order to have at discrete level
n
˚n
F
A˚· v̊ q j+1/2 ,
q, j+1/2 ≡
(3.14)
which is the discrete analogue of the continuous identity F̊q ≡ A˚ · v̊ q . Basically, our
philosophy consists in preserving as many as possible continuous properties at the discrete
level. For example, the following matrix satisfies the condition (3.14):
!
n
0
1
n
A˚j+1/2
=
= R̊ · Λ̊ · L̊ j+1/2
n n
n
n
−uj uj+1 + g Hj+1/2 2 uj+1/2
The matrices Lnj+1/2 and Rnj+1/2 = (Lnj+1/2 )−1 are computed by formulas (2.28). The
n
Jacobian matrix A˚j+1/2
eigenvalues can be readily computed:
q
q
def
def
n
n
n
n
n
n
2 − un un
:=
λ±,
:=
(u
±
s)
,
s
(u
)
+
g
H
>
g Hj+1/2
> 0.
j+1/2
j+1/2
j j+1
j+1/2
j+1/2
j+1/2
Thanks to the discrete differentiation rule (3.14), we can derive elegant formulas for the
˚∗ by drastically simplifying the scheme (3.12), (3.13):
predicted values v̊ ∗♯, c , F
♯, c
h
in
τ
¯
v̊ ∗j+1/2 = v̊ −
R̊ · D · Λ̊ · P̊ − L̊ · G˚
,
(3.15)
2J
j+1/2
h
in
τ
¯
∗
˚
˚
˚
Fj+1/2 = F −
,
(3.16)
R̊ · D · Λ̊ · Λ̊ · P̊ − L̊ · G
2J
j+1/2
where we introduced two matrices:
n
def
def
¯
n
:= L̊ · v̊ q j+1/2 .
P̊j+1/2
Λ̊nj+1/2 := Λ̊nj+1/2 − xt,nj+1/2 · I ,
1,2
Finally, the scheme parameters θj+1/2
are chosen as it was explained in our previous works
[94, 129] for the case of Nonlinear Shallow Water Equations. This choice guarantees the
TVD property of the resulting scheme.
22 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
˚∗ ,
Non-hydrostatic pressure computation. Once we determined the predicted values v̊ ∗♯, c , F
♯, c
we have to determine also the predicted value for the non-hydrostatic pressure components
˚ ∗ located in cell centers Q . In order to discretize the elliptic equation (3.10) we apply
℘
h, c
♯, c
the same finite volume philosophy. Namely, we integrate equation (3.10) over one cell
[qj , qj+1 ]. Right now for simplicity we consider an interior element. The approximation
near boundaries will be discussed below. The integral form of equation (3.10) reads
ˆ
qj+1
qj
˚ ∗ dq
K̊ ℘
q q
−
ˆ
qj+1
˚ ∗ dq
K̊0 ℘
ˆ
=
qj
qj+1
(3.17)
F̊ dq .
qj
The coefficients K̊, K̊0 are evaluated using the predicted value of the total water depth
n
H̊♯,∗ c . If the scheme parameter θj+1/2
≡ 0 , ∀j = 0, . . . , N − 1, then the predictor value
would lie completely on the middle layer t = t n + τ2 . However, this simple choice of
n
{θj+1/2
}jN=−1
0 does not ensure the desired TVD property [10, 129].
The solution of this integral equation will give us the predictor value for the non˚ ∗ . The finite difference scheme for equation (3.10) is obtained
hydrostatic pressure ℘
♯, c
by applying the following quadrature formulas to all the terms in integral equation (3.17):
ˆ
qj+1
qj
ˆ
qj+1
qj
ˆ
qj+1
qj
˚∗
˚∗
℘
℘
−
K̊
+
K̊
j+3/2
j+1/2
j+3/2
j+1/2
˚
·
K̊ ℘
q q dq ≃
2
∆q
∗
K̊j+1/2 + K̊j−1/2
−
·
2
˚ ∗ dq ≃
K̊0 ℘
∆q ·
h 12 Jn
(H̊ ∗ )3
h
+
·
Υ̊ − 3 i
Υ̊
˚∗
℘
j+1/2
˚∗
− ℘
j−1/2
,
∆q
j+1/2
3 h̊nq
Υ̊ Jn (H̊ ∗ )2
i
j+3/2
−
h
3 h̊nq
Υ̊ Jn (H̊ ∗ )2
i
j−1/2
˚∗
℘
j+1/2 ,
η̊ ∗
(ů∗ )2
η̊ ∗
R̊ h̊nq
R̊ h̊nq
6 R̊ Jn
q
q
q
− g n +
.
F̊ dq ≃ ∆q · 2 n −
+ g n +
J
J
J
Υ̊ Jn j+1
Υ̊ Jn j
Υ̊ H̊ ∗ j+1/2
In approximation formulas above we introduced the following notations:
def
K̊j+1/2 :=
h
4
Υ̊ Jn H̊ ∗
i
j+1/2
,
def
Υ̊j+1/2 := 4 +
h̊n 2
q
n
J
j+1/2
,
def
Jnj :=
Jnj+1/2 + Jnj−1/2
2
.
23 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
In this way we obtain a three-point finite difference approximation of the elliptic equation
(3.10) in interior of the domain, i.e. j = 1, . . . , N − 2 :
˚∗
˚∗
˚∗
˚∗
K̊j+1/2 + K̊j−1/2 ℘j+1/2 − ℘j−1/2
K̊j+3/2 + K̊j+1/2 ℘j+3/2 − ℘j+1/2
·
−
·
2
∆q
2
∆q
n
h 12 Jn Υ̊ − 3 i
i
i
h
h
3 h̊nq
3 h̊q
− ∆q ·
·
=
−
+
j+1/2
Υ̊
(H̊ ∗ )3
Υ̊ Jn (H̊ ∗ )2 j+3/2
Υ̊ Jn (H̊ ∗ )2 j−1/2
(ů∗ )2
η̊ ∗
η̊ ∗
R̊ h̊nq
R̊ h̊nq
6 R̊ Jn
q
q
q
∆q · 2 n −
+ g n +
− g n +
. (3.18)
J
J
J
Υ̊ Jn j+1
Υ̊ Jn j
Υ̊ H̊ ∗ j+1/2
Two missing equations are obtained by approximating the integral equation (3.17) in intervals adjacent to the boundaries. As a result, we obtain a linear system of equations
N −1
˚∗
where unknowns are {℘
j+1/2 }j = 0 . The approximation in boundary cells will be illustrated
on the left boundary [q0 ≡ 0, q1 ]. The right-most cell [qN −1 , qN ≡ 1] can be treated
similarly. Let us write down one-sided quadrature formulas for the first cell:
K̊3/2 + K̊1/2
·
2
+
˚∗
℘
3/2
h
˚∗
˚∗
− ℘
4℘
1/2
q
−
∗
∆q
J H̊ Υ̊
{z
|
1
3 h̊nq
Υ̊ Jn (H̊ ∗ )2
i
3/2
+
h
q=0
}
h 12 Jn Υ̊ − 3 i
∗
˚
℘
− 1/2 ∆q ·
·
1/2
Υ̊
(H̊ ∗ )3
3 h̊nq
Υ̊ Jn (H̊ ∗ )2
(ů∗ )2
η̊ ∗
6 R̊ Jn
q
q
= ∆q · 2 n −
+ g n
∗
J
J
Υ̊ H̊ 1/2
i
+
˚∗
6 h̊nq ℘
J (H̊ ∗ )2 Υ̊
q=0
{z
}
|
2
η̊ ∗
R̊ h̊nq
R̊ h̊nq
q
+
− g n +
J
Υ̊ Jn 1
Υ̊ Jn
{z
|
3
1/2
.
q =0
}
It can be readily noticed that terms 1 + 2 + 3 vanish thanks to the boundary
condition (3.11) (the part at q = 0). The same trick applies to the right-most cell
[qN −1 , qN ≡ 1]. We reiterate on the fact that in our scheme the boundary conditions
are taken into account exactly. Consequently, in two boundary cells we obtain a two-point
finite difference approximation to equation (3.10). The resulting linear system of equations
can be solved using e.g. the direct Thomas algorithm with linear complexity O(N). Under
6 0 the numerical solution exists, it is
> 0 , h̊q
the conditions K̊0 > 0 , h̊q
q =0
unique and stable [122].
q=1
24 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
3.3.2 Corrector step
During the corrector step we solve again separately the hyperbolic and elliptic parts of
the SGN equations. In order to determine the vector of conservative variables v̊ n+1
we use
♯
an explicit finite volume scheme based on the conservative equation (3.6):
˚∗ − xt · v̊ ∗
F
(Jv̊)n+1
− (Jv̊)nj
j
+
τ
j+1/2
˚∗ − xt · v̊ ∗
F
−
∆q
j−1/2
= G˚j∗ ,
(3.19)
where
def
G˚j∗ :=
0
,
˚∗
− ˚
̺∗ h̊nq + ♭ + ℘
q
g H̊ n + ♭
∗
˚
℘
q, j
def
:=
˚∗
℘
j+1/2
j
˚∗
− ℘
j−1/2
,
∆q
and
n+1
n+1
n
n
H̊j+1
+ H̊j−1
+ 2 H̊jn+1 + 2 H̊jn + H̊j+1
+ H̊j−1
,
8
n+1
n+1
n
n
def h̊j+1 − h̊j−1 + h̊j+1 − h̊j−1
:=
.
4 ∆q
def
H̊jn + ♭ :=
h̊nq + ♭
(3.20)
(3.21)
The algorithm of the corrector scheme can be summarized as follows:
(1) From the mass conservation equations (the first component in (3.19)) we find the
total water depth H̊♯n+1 in interior nodes of the grid
(2) Using the method of characteristics and the boundary conditions ůn+1
= ůn+1
≡ 0
0
N
n+1
n+1
we determine the total water depth H̊0 , H̊N in boundary points q0 ≡ 0 and
qN ≡ 1
(3) Then, using the momentum conservation equation (the second component in (3.19))
we find the momentum values (H̊ ů)n+1
on the next time layer.
♯
In this way, we obtain an explicit scheme despite the fact that the right hand side G˚♯∗
depends on the water depth H̊♯n+1 at the new time layer t = tn+1 .
˚ n+1 is comNon-hydrostatic pressure correction. The non-hydrostatic pressure correction ℘
♯
puted by integrating locally the elliptic equation (3.10) around each grid point:
ˆ
qj+1/2
qj−1/2
˚ n+1 dq −
K̊ ℘
q
q
ˆ
qj+1/2
qj−1/2
˚ n+1 dq =
K̊0 ℘
ˆ
qj+1/2
qj−1/2
F̊ n+1 dq ,
j = 1, . . . , N −1 ,
25 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
The details of integrals approximations are similar to the predictor step described above.
Consequently, we provide directly the difference scheme in interior nodes:
˚ n+1
℘
j+1
˚ n+1
˚ n+1 − ℘
˚ n+1
℘
− ℘
j
j
j−1
Kj+1/2
− Kj−1/2
=
∆q
∆q
n+1
n+1
n+1
(
Υ̊
−
3)
J
h̊
(
Υ̊
−
3)
J
h̊
q
q
˚
− 6 ℘j
∆q
=
+ ∆q
−
+
Υ̊ H̊ 3
Υ̊ J H̊ 2 j−1/2
Υ̊ H̊ 3
Υ̊ J H̊ 2 j+1/2
η̊
ů2
η̊
6 R̊ J n+1
R̊ h̊q n+1
R̊ h̊q n+1
q
q
q
−
+
+
− g
, (3.22)
∆q 2
+ g
J
J
J
Υ̊ J j+1/2
Υ̊ J j−1/2
Υ̊ H̊ j
where
4
def
Kj+1/2 :=
Υ̊ J H̊
n+1 ,
def
Υ̊n+1
j+1/2 :=
4+
j+1/2
h h̊n+1 − h̊n+1 i2
j+1
j
n+1
xn+1
j+1 − xj
,
def
Jn+1
j+1/2 :=
n+1
xn+1
j+1 − xj
.
∆q
In order to complete the scheme description, we have to specify the discretization of the
elliptic equation (3.10) in boundary cells. To be specific we take again the left-most cell
[q0 ≡ 0, q1/2 ]. The integral equation in this cell reads:
ˆ q1/2
ˆ q1/2
ˆ q1/2
˚ n+1
n+1
˚
℘
℘
K̊ q
dq −
K̊0
dq =
F̊ n+1 dq .
q
q0
q0
q0
And the corresponding difference equation is
K1/2
˚ n+1
℘
1
n+1
˚ n+1
˚ n+1
˚ n+1
℘
n+1
4℘
− ℘
(
Υ̊
−
3)
J
h̊
6
h̊
q
q
q
0
˚
− 6 ℘0
=
−
∆q
+
+
∆q
Υ̊ H̊ 3
J H̊ Υ̊ q = 0
J H̊ 2 Υ̊ 1/2
J H̊ 2 Υ̊ q = 0
|
| {z }
{z
}
31
32
n+1
n+1
ů2
η̊
R̊ h̊q
R̊ h̊q
3 R̊ J
η̊q
q
q
.
+
−
+
+ ∆q
g
− g
J
J
J
Υ̊ J
Υ̊ J q = 0
Υ̊ H̊
1/2
|
{z
}
33
By taking into account the boundary condition (3.11) we obtain that three under-braced
terms vanish:
31 + 32 + 33 ≡ 0 .
A similar two-point approximation can be obtained by integrating over the right-most cell
h
∆q i
qN −1/2 , qN ≡ 1 −
, 1 . In this way we obtain again a three-diagonal system of
2
linear equations which can be efficiently solved with the Thomas algorithm [81].
26 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
Stability of the scheme. In order to ensure the stability of (nonlinear) computations, we
impose a slightly stricter restriction on the time step τ than the linear analysis given below
predicts (see Section 3.4.1). Namely, at every time layer we apply the same restriction as
for hyperbolic (non-dispersive) Nonlinear Shallow Water Equations [94]:
n, ±
max{ Cj+1/2
} 6 1,
j
n, ±
where Cj+1/2
are local Courant numbers [40] which are defined as follows
τ h | λ± − xt | in
def
n, ±
:=
Cj+1/2
.
∆q
J
j+1/2
3.3.3 Well-balanced property
It can be easily established that the predictor–corrector scheme presented above preserves
exactly the so-called states ‘lake-at-rest’:
Lemma 1. Assume that the bottom is stationary ( i.e. ht ≡ 0 , but not necessary flat)
and initially the fluid is at the ‘lake-at-rest’ state, i.e.
η̊j0 ≡ 0 ,
ůj0 ≡ 0
j = 0, 1, 2, . . . , N .
(3.23)
Then, the predictor–corrector scheme will preserve this state at all time layers.
Proof. In order to prove this Lemma, we employ the mathematical induction [80]. First,
we have to discuss the generation of the initial grid and how it will be transformed to the
next time layer along with the discrete numerical solution:
x0♯ ֒→ x1♯ ,
v̊ 0♯ ֒→ v̊ ∗c, ♯ ֒→ v̊ 1♯ .
Then, by assuming that our statement is true at the nth time layer, we will have to show
that it is true on the upcoming (n + 1)th layer. This will complete the proof [80].
If the monitoring function ̟(x, t) depends only on the free surface elevation η(x, t) and
fluid velocity u(x, t), then the monitoring function ̟(x, t) ≡ 1 thanks to Lemma assumption (3.23). And the equidistribution principle (3.2) will give us the uniform mesh. However, in most general situations one can envisage the grid adaptation upon the bathymetry
profile∗ h(x, t). Consequently, in general we can expect that the mesh will be non-uniform
even under condition (3.23), since hx 6= 0 . However, we know that the initial grid satisfies
the fully converged discrete equidistribution principle (3.3). From now on we assume that
the initial grid is generated and it is not necessarily uniform. In order to construct the grid
at the next layer, we solve just one linear equation (3.5). Since, system (3.5) is diagonally
dominant, its solution exists and it is unique [122]. It is not difficult to check that the set
of values {xj1 ≡ xj0 }N
j = 0 solves the system (3.5). It follows from two observations:
• The right-hand side of (3.5) vanishes when x1j ≡ x0j , ∀j = 0, . . . , N .
0
• The monitor function {̟j+1/2
}jN=−10 is evaluated on the previous time layer t = 0 .
∗In
the present study we do not consider such example. However, the idea of grid adaptation upon
the bathymetry function certainly deserves to be studied more carefully.
27 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
Thus, we obtain that x♯1 ≡ x♯0 . Consequently, we have xt,0 j
∀j = 0, . . . , N .
≡ 0 and Jj1 = Jj0 ,
˚ 0 and ˚
In order to complete the predictor step we need to determine the quantities ℘
̺♯0
♯
0
on which depends the source term G˚j+1/2
. These quantities are uniquely determined by
˚ 0 are obtained by solving linear equations
prescribed initial conditions. For instance, ℘
♯
(3.22). We showed above also that the solution to this equation is unique. We notice
also that the right-hand side in equation (3.22) vanishes under conditions of this Lemma.
˚ 0 ≡ 0 . By applying a finite difference analogue of equation
Consequently, we obtain ℘
♯
(3.9) we obtain also that ̺♯0 ≡ 0 . As the result, at the ‘lake-at-rest’ state the right-hand
side of predictor equations (3.12), (3.13) reads
!
0
0
G˚j+1/2
=
.
0
(g h̊ h̊q )j+1/2
Taking into account the fact that the mesh does not evolve x0♯ ֒→ x1♯ ≡ x0♯ , we obtain
q
¯0
0
0
g h̊j+1/2 ,
xt,0 j ≡ 0 and thus Λ̊j+1/2
≡ Λ̊j+1/2
, sj+1/2
≡
!
!
h̊q, j+1/2
h̊q, j+1/2
0
0
¯
.
,
L̊ · G˚ j+1/2 ≡
Λ̊ · P̊ j+1/2 ≡
h̊q, j+1/2
h̊q, j+1/2
Consequently, the predictor step (3.15), (3.16) gives us the following values:
0
v̊ ∗j+1/2 ≡ v̊ j+1/2
,
˚∗
˚0
F
j+1/2 ≡ Fj+1/2 .
For the sake of clarity, we rewrite the last predictions in component-wise form:
!
!
0
h̊
j+1/2
˚∗
2
v̊ ∗j+1/2 ≡
,
F
.
g h̊j+1/2
j+1/2 ≡
0
2
∗
Thus, H̊j+1/2
≡ h̊j+1/2 . As an intermediate conclusion of the predictor step we have:
∗
ηj+1/2
≡ 0,
ů∗j+1/2 ≡ 0 ,
˚ ∗, ˚
∗
and all dispersive corrections ℘
♯ ̺♯ vanish as well by applying similar arguments to
equation (3.18).
The corrector step (3.19), written component-wise reads:
(J ů H̊)j1 − (J ů H̊)j0
τ
(J H̊)j1 − (J H̊)j0
= 0,
τ
2
2
g h̊j+1/2
− g h̊j−1/2
♭
+
= g H̊ h̊q j
2 ∆q
From the first equation above taking into account that Jj1 ≡ Jj0 and H̊j0 = h̊j we obtain
H̊j1 = h̊j . And thus, by the definition of the total water depth we obtain η̊j1 ≡ 0 . In
28 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
the second equation above by condition (3.23) we have that ůj0 ≡ 0 . Moreover, in the
left-hand side:
2
2
g h̊j+1/2
− g h̊j−1/2
2 ∆q
= g
(h̊j+1 − h̊j−1 ) · (h̊j+1 + 2 h̊j + h̊j−1 )
.
8 ∆q
(3.24)
The right-hand side of the same corrector equation can be rewritten using definitions (3.20),
(3.21) as
♭
2 h̊j+1 + 4 h̊j + 2 h̊j−1 2 h̊j+1 − 2 h̊j−1
g H̊ h̊q j = g
·
.
(3.25)
8
4 ∆q
Comparing equation (3.24) with (3.25) yields the desired well-balanced property of the
predictor–corrector scheme and thus ůj1 ≡ 0 .
By assuming that (3.23) is verified at the time layer t = t n and repeating precisely
the same reasoning as above (by substituting superscripts 0 ← n and 1 ← n + 1) we
obtain that (3.23) is verified at the next time layer t = t n+1 . It completes the proof of
this Lemma.
We would like to mention that the well-balanced property of the proposed scheme was
checked also in numerical experiments on various configurations of general uneven bottoms
(not reported here for the sake of manuscript compactness) — in all cases we witnessed
the preservation of the ‘lake-at-rest’ state up to the machine precision. This validates our
numerical implementation of the proposed algorithm.
3.4. Numerical scheme for linearized equations
In order to study the numerical scheme stability and its dispersive properties, we consider the discretization of the linearized SGN equations on a uniform unbounded grid (for
simplicity we consider an IVP without boundary conditions). The governing equations
after linearization can be written as (we already gave these equations in Section 2.5)
ηt + d ux = 0 ,
ut + g ηx =
℘xx
−
3
d2
℘
1
d
℘x ,
= c2 ηxx ,
√
where c =
g d is the speed of linear gravity waves. We shall apply to these PDEs
precisely the same scheme as described above. Since the grid is uniform, we can return
to the original notation, i.e. v̊ ≡ v, etc. Let ∆x be the discretization step in the
computational domain Ih and τ is the local time step. We introduce the following finite
difference operators (illustrated on the free surface elevation η ♯n ):
ηt,nj
ηjn+1 − ηjn
:=
,
τ
def
ηx,n j
n
ηj+1
− ηjn
:=
,
∆x
def
n
η(x),
j
n
n
ηj+1
− ηj−1
:=
,
2 ∆x
def
29 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
n
n
n
n
n
n
ηj+1
− 2 ηjn + ηj−1
def ηxx, j + ηxx, j+1
def ηxx, j+1 − ηxx, j
n
n
,
η
,
η
.
:=
:=
xx, j+1/2
xxx, j
∆x2
2
∆x
+∞
∗
∗
Then, at the predictor step we compute auxiliary quantities {ηj+1/2
}+∞
j = −∞ , {uj+1/2 }j = −∞
∗
and {℘j+1/2 }+∞
j = −∞ . First, we solve the hyperbolic part of the linearized SGN equations:
∗
n
ηj+1/2
− 21 ηj+1
+ ηjn
+ d unx, j = 0 ,
∗
τj+1/2
u∗j+1/2 − 12 unj+1 + unj
1 ℘n
+ g ηx,n j =
,
∗
τj+1/2
d x, j
def
n
ηxx,
j :=
and then we solve the elliptic equation to find {℘j+1/2 }+∞
j = −∞ :
∗
℘∗j+3/2
∗
∗
∗
∗
η∗
− 2 ηj+1/2
+ ηj−1/2
− 2 ℘j+1/2 + ℘j−1/2
3 ℘∗
2 j+3/2
− 2 j+1/2 = c
,
∆x2
d
∆x2
def τ
∗
n
n
where τj+1/2
:=
(1 + θj+1/2
) and θj+1/2
is the numerical scheme parameter [94],
2
whose choice guarantees the TVD property (strictly speaking the proof was done for scalar
hyperbolic equations only).
Then, the predicted values are used on the second — corrector step, to compute all
n+1
n+1 +∞
physical quantities {ηjn+1 }+∞
}j = −∞ and {℘j }+∞
j = −∞ , {uj
j = −∞ on the next time layer
n+1
t = t :
u∗j+1/2 − u∗j−1/2
= 0,
(3.26)
ηt,nj + d
∆x
∗
∗
∗
∗
ηj+1/2
− ηj−1/2
1 ℘j+1/2 − ℘j−1/2
n
ut, j + g
=
,
(3.27)
∆x
d
∆x
3 ℘n+1
n+1
℘n+1
= c2 ηxx,
(3.28)
xx, j −
j .
d2 j
It can be easily checked that the scheme presented above has the first order accuracy if
n
n
θj+1/2 = const , ∀j and the second order if θj+1/2
≡ 0 , ∀j . However, the last condition
can be somehow relaxed. There is an interesting case of quasi-constant values of the scheme
parameter:
n
θj+1/2
= O (τ + ∆x) .
In this case the scheme is second order accurate as well. In the present Section we perform
n
a theoretical analysis of the scheme and we shall assume for simplicity that θj+1/2
≡ const.
Consequently, from now on we shall drop the index j + 1/2 in the intermediate time step
∗
τj+1/2
.
3.4.1 Linear stability of the scheme
In this Section we apply the so-called von Neumann stability analysis to the predictor–
corrector scheme described above [28]. In order to study the scheme stability, first we
30 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
+∞
∗
∗
exclude algebraically the predicted values {ηj+1/2
}+∞
j = −∞ , {uj+1/2 }j = −∞ from difference
equations. The resulting system reads:
n
∗℘
ηt,nj + d un(x), j = τ ∗ c2 ηxx,
j − τ
xx, j ,
n
unt, j
℘∗j+3/2 − 2 ℘∗j+1/2 + ℘∗j−1/2
+ g
n
η(x),
j
∗ 2
= τ c
unxx, j
− ℘j−1/2
, (3.30)
∆x
− τ ∗ d unxxx, j .
(3.31)
1
+
d
℘∗j+1/2
(3.29)
∗
3 ℘∗
n
= c2 ηxx,
j+1/2
d2 j+1/2
We substitute in all difference relations above the following elementary harmonics
∆x 2
ηjn = Λ0 ρn e i j ξ ,
−
unj = Ψ0 ρn e i j ξ ,
℘nj
= Φ0 ρn ei j ξ ,
℘∗j+1/2
= Φ∗0 (ρ) e i (j+1/2) ξ ,
(3.32)
def
where ξ := k · ∆x ∈ [0, π] is the scaled wavenumber and ρ is the transmission factor
between the time layers tn and tn+1 . As a result, from equations (3.28) and (3.31) we
obtain the following expressions for Φ0 and Φ∗0 :
h
i
2 2
4 c2 d 2 2
∗
n 2c d
∗ 4d
2
Φ0 =
ג
Λ
,
Φ
(ρ)
=
ρ
ג
Λ
sin(ξ)
−
i
τ
ג
Ψ
,
0
0
0
0
3 ℏ ∆x 2
3 ℏ ∆x 2
∆x
where we introduced some short-hand notations:
ξ
4 d2 2
τ
def
def
def
def
def
, k := 4 c2 ℵ 2 ג2 , i := c ℵ sin(ξ) , ℏ := 1 +
, ג:= sin
ג.
ℵ :=
∆x
2
3 ∆x 2
By substituting just obtained expressions for Φ0 and Φ∗0 into equations (3.29), (3.30) we
obtain two linear equations with respect to amplitudes Λ0 and Ψ0 :
h
2 c2 ℵ2 (1 + θ) 2 i
ρ − 1 +
גΛ0 + i ℵ d sin(ξ) Ψ0 = 0 ,
ℏ
h
2 c2 ℵ2 (1 + θ) 2 i
g ℵ sin(ξ)
Λ0 + ρ − 1 +
גΨ0 = 0 .
i
ℏ
ℏ
The necessary condition to have non-trivial solutions gives us an algebraic equation for the
transmission factor ρ:
k (1 + θ)
k2 (1 + θ)2
i2
(ρ − 1) +
+
= 0.
ℏ
4 ℏ2
ℏ
This quadratic equation admits two distinct roots:
(ρ − 1)2 +
ρ± = 1 −
k (1 + θ)
i
± i√ .
2ℏ
ℏ
(3.33)
The necessary stability condition | ρ | 6 1 is equivalent to the following condition on
quadratic equation coefficients:
h
4 ς2 i
d
def
2 2
2
c ℵ (1 + θ) ζ − 1 +
ζ (ζ + θ) 6 0 ,
ς :=
,
(3.34)
3
∆x
def
which has to be fulfilled for all ζ := ג2 ∈ [0, 1]. The parameter ς characterizes the grid
resolution relative to the mean water depth. This parameter appears in stability condition
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
31 / 66
along with the Courant ratio ℵ. It is one of the differences with non-dispersive equations
whose discretization stability depends only on ℵ.
Further thoughts about stability. When long waves travel towards the shoreline, their shoal-
ing process is often accompanied with the formation of undular bores [75, 116]. Undular
bores have dispersive nature and cannot be correctly described by dispersionless models.
In [75] it was shown that satisfactory description of dispersive effects in shallow water
d
def
= 2 ∼ 4 . In another study [70] it was shown
environments is obtained for ς :=
∆x
that for satisfactory modeling of trans-oceanic wave propagation it is sufficient to choose
ς ≈ 4 in deep ocean and ς ≈ 1 in shallow coastal areas. In other words, it is sufficient to
choose the grid size equal to water depth in shallow waters and in deep areas — four times
smaller than the water depth. On coarser grids the numerical dispersion may dominate
√
3
over the physical one [70]. In the present study we shall assume that parameter ς >
.
2
Substituting into equation (3.34) the value ζ ≡ 0 we obtain that for stability reasons
necessarily the scheme parameter θ > 0 . Since the predictor layer should be in between
time layers t = tn and t = tn+1 we have θ 6 1 . Then, for fixed values of parameters ς
and θ the stability condition (3.34) takes the following form:
r
4
1 + ς2 θ
3
.
cℵ 6
1 + θ
For θ ≡ 0 the last condition simply becomes:
cℵ 6 1,
and it does not depend on parameter ς. However, when θ > 0, then the scheme stability
depends on the mesh refinement ς relative to the mean water depth. Surprisingly, more we
refine the grid, less stringent becomes the stability barrier. In the asymptotic limit ς ≫ 1
we obtain the following restriction on the time step τ :
√
2 θ
1
τ 6 √
τ0 < √ τ0 ≈ 0.58 τ0 ,
3 (1 + θ)
3
def
where τ0 := dc ≡ √dgd is the characteristic time scale of gravity waves. Above we used
the following obvious inequality:
√
1 + θ > 2 θ,
∀ θ ∈ R+ .
So, in practice for sufficiently refined grids the stability condition de facto does not
involve the grid spacing ∆x anymore. This property is very desirable for numerical simulations. For the sake of comparison we give here (without underlying computations) the
stability restriction of the same predictor–corrector scheme for NSWE equations:
cℵ 6 √
1
.
1 + θ
32 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
So, another surprising conclusion obtained from this linear stability analysis is that the
SGN equations require in fine a less stringent condition on the time step than corresponding
dispersionless NSWE. Most probably, this conclusion can be explained by the regularization
effect of the dispersion. Indeed, the NSWE bores are replaced by smooth undular bores
whose regularity is certainly higher. The smoothness of solutions allows to use a larger time
step τ to propagate the numerical solution. This conclusion was checked in (fully nonlinear)
numerical experiments (not reported here) where the time step τ was artificially pushed
towards the stability limits. In general, the omission of dispersive effects yields a stricter
stability condition. The authors of [71] came experimentally to similar conclusions about
the time step limit in dispersive and hydrostatic simulations. Our theoretical analysis
reported above may serve as a basis of rational explanation of this empirical fact.
This result is to be compared with a numerical scheme proposed in [41] for a weakly
nonlinear weakly dispersive water wave model. They used splitting technique and solved an
elliptic equation to determine the non-hydrostatic pressure correction. The main drawback
of the scheme proposed in [41] is the stability condition:
∆x > 1.5 d .
One can easily see that a numerical computation with a sufficiently refined grid is simply
impossible with that scheme. Our method is free of such drawbacks.
3.4.2 Discrete dispersion relation
The dispersion relation properties are crucial to understand and explain the behaviour
of the numerical solution [101]. In this Section we perform the dispersion relation analysis
of the proposed above predictor–corrector scheme. This analysis is based on the study
of elementary plane-wave solutions (3.32). The continuous case was already analyzed in
Section 2.5. Dispersive properties of the scheme can be completely characterized by the
def
phase error ∆ϕ := φ − ϕ committed during solution transfer from time layer t = tn
to t = tn+1 = tn + τ . Here we denote by φ the phase shift due to the SGN equations
dynamics and ϕ is its discrete counterpart. From equations (2.30) and (3.33) we obtain
correspondingly:
φ = arg(e−i ω τ ) ≡ −ω τ = ± r
cℵξ
, ξ ∈ [0, π] ,
ς 2 ξ2
1 +
3
i
h
k (1 + θ)
/| ρ | ,
ϕ = arg ρ = ± arccos 1 −
2ℏ
(3.35)
(3.36)
In other words, the phase change φ is predicted by the ‘exact’ SGN equations properties,
while ϕ comes from the approximate dynamics as predicted by the predictor–corrector
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
33 / 66
scheme. Since we are interested in long wave modelling, we can consider Taylor expansions of the phase shifts in the limit ξ → 0 (assuming that ς and ℵ are kept constant):
h
i
cℵ 2 3
φ = ± cℵξ −
ς ξ + O(ξ 4 ) ,
6
i
h
cℵ
(c ℵ)2 (3 θ + 1) − 1 − ς 2 ξ 3 + O(ξ 4 ) .
ϕ = ± cℵξ +
6
The asymptotic expression for the phase error is obtained by subtracting above expressions:
∆ϕ = ∓
cℵ
(c ℵ)2 (3 θ + 1) − 1 ξ 3 + O(ξ 4 ) .
6
From the last relation one can see that the leading part of the phase error has the same
asymptotic order as the ‘physical’ dispersion of the SGN equations. In general, this result is
not satisfactory. However, this situation can be improved if for the given scheme parameter
θ > 0, the Courant ratio ℵ is chosen according to the following formula:
cℵ = √
1
.
1 + 3θ
In this case the numerical phase error will be one order lower than the physical dispersion
of the SGN system.
In Figure 2 we represent graphically phase shifts predicted by various models. The
dashed line (1) is the phase shift of the predictor–corrector scheme given by equation (3.36)
(taken with + sign) for the parameters values θ = 0 , c ℵ = 1 , ς = 2 . The continuous
dispersion relation are shown with the dotted line (3) (the SGN equations, formula (3.35))
and the solid line (4) (full Euler equations):
s
tanh(ς ξ)
φEuler = ± c ℵ ξ
.
ςξ
It can be seen that our predictor–corrector scheme provides a better approximation to the
dispersion relation than the scheme proposed by Peregrine [116] (dash-dotted line (2) in
Figure 2). The analysis of the discrete dispersion relation of Peregrine’s scheme is not
given here, but we provide only the final result for the phase change:
i2
.
φPeregrine = ± arccos 1 −
2ℏ
In Figure 2 one can see that the predictor–corrector scheme (curve (1)) approximates well
the dispersion relation of the SGN equations (curve (3)) up to ξ = k · ∆x > π4 . In terms
of the wave length λ we obtain that λ ? 8 ∆x and for ς = 2 we obtain the inequality
λ ? 4 d. So, as the main result of the present analysis we conclude that our scheme is
able to propagate accurately water waves whose length is four times longer than the mean
water depth d.
34 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
Φ
1.2
4
3
0.8
1
0.4
2
0.0
0
1
2
ξ
3
Figure 2. Phase shifts in different models: (1) predictor–corrector scheme; (2)
Peregrine’s numerical scheme [116]; (3) the SGN equations; (4) full Euler
equations.
4. Numerical results
Below we present a certain number of test cases which aim to validate and illustrate the
performance of the numerical scheme described above along with our implementation of
this method.
4.1. Solitary wave propagation over the flat bottom
As we saw above in Section 2.4.1, in a special case of constant water depth h(x, t) =
d the SGN equations admit solitary wave solutions (given by explicit simple analytical
formulas) which propagate with constant speed without changing their shapes.
4.1.1 Uniform grid
These analytical solutions can be used to estimate the accuracy of the fully discrete
numerical scheme. Consequently, we take a sufficiently large domain [0, ℓ] with ℓ p
= 80.
In this Section all lengths are relative to the water depth d, and time is scaled with g/d.
35 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
0.4
0.4
η /d
η /d
1
2
3
4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0
55
60
65
70
x/d
1
2
3
4
0.3
75
10
(a)
15
20
t(g/d)
1/2
25
(b)
Figure 3. Propagation of a solitary wave over the flat bottom: (a) free surface
profile at t = 20; (b) wave gauge data at x = 60. Various lines denote: (1) —
N = 80, (2) — N = 160, (3) — N = 320, (4) — the exact analytical
solution given by formula (2.29).
For instance, if the solitary wave amplitude α = 0.7, then α d = 0.7 d in dimensional
variables. So, the solitary wave is initially located at x0 = 40. In computations below we
take a solitary wave of amplitude α = 0.4. In general, the SGN travelling wave solutions
approximate fairly well those of the full Euler model up to amplitudes α > 21 (see [49]
for comparisons).
In Figure 3 we show a zoom on free surface profile (a) at t = 20 and wave gauge data
(b) in a fixed location x = 60 for various spatial (and uniform) resolutions. By this time,
the solitary wave propagated the horizontal distance of 20 mean water depths. It can be
seen that the numerical solution converges to the analytical one.
In order to quantify the accuracy of the numerical solution we measure the relative l∞
discrete error:
def
k εh k∞ := α−1 k ηh − η k∞ ,
where ηh stands for the numerical and η – for the exact free surface profiles. The factor
α−1 is used to obtain the dimensionless error. Then, the order of convergence k can be
estimated as
k ε h k∞
k ≃ log2
.
k εh/2 k∞
The numerical results in Table 1 indicate that k → 2, when N → +∞. This validates
the proposed scheme and the numerical solver.
36 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
N
ς
80
160
320
640
1280
2560
1
2
4
8
16
32
k ε h k∞
0.2442
0.1277
0.3344 × 10−1
0.8639 × 10−2
0.2208 × 10−2
0.5547 × 10−3
k
—
0.94
1.93
1.95
1.97
1.99
Table 1. Numerical estimation of the convergence order for the analytical
d
solitary wave propagation test case. The parameter ς = ∆x
characterizes
the mesh resolution relative to the mean water depth d.
4.1.2 Adaptive grid
In order to show the performance of the adaptive algorithm, we adopt two monitor
functions in our computations:
̟0 [ η ] (x, t) = 1 + ϑ0 | η(x, t) | ,
̟1 [ η ](x, t) = 1 + ϑ0 | η(x, t) | + ϑ1 | ηx (x, t) | ,
(4.1)
(4.2)
where ϑ 0, 1 > 0 are some positive constants. In numerical simulations we use ϑ 0 =
ϑ 1 = 10 and only N = 80 grid points. Above we showed that numerical results are
rather catastrophic when these 80 grid points are distributed uniformly (see Figure 3).
Numerical results on adaptive moving grids obtained with monitor functions ̟ 0, 1 (x, t)
are shown in Figure 4. The monitor function ̟ 0 (x, t) ensures that points concentrate
around the wave crest, leaving the areas in front and behind relatively rarefied. The visual
comparison of panels 4(b) and 4(c) shows that the inclusion of the spatial derivative ηx
into the monitor function ̟1 (x, t) yields the increase of dense zones around the wave crest.
With an adaptive grid involving only N = 80 points we obtain a numerical solution of
quality similar to the uniform grid with N = 320 points.
4.2. Solitary wave/wall interaction
For numerous practical purposes in Coastal Engineering it is important to model correctly wave/structure interaction processes [118]. In this Section we apply the above
proposed numerical algorithm to the simulation of a simple solitary wave/vertical wall
interaction. The reason is two-fold:
(1) Many coastal structures involve vertical walls as building elements,
(2) This problem is well studied by previous investigators and, consequently, there is
enough available data/results for comparisons
37 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
20
t(g/d)
η /d
t(g/d)
1/2
1/2
20
0.4
1
2
3
4
0.3
0.2
0.1
15
15
10
10
5
5
0
55
60
65
(a)
70
x/d
75
0
30
40
50
(b)
60
x/d
70
0
30
40
50
60
x/d
70
(c)
Figure 4. Propagation of a solitary wave over the flat bottom simulated with
moving adapted grids: (a) free surface profile at t = 20; (b) trajectory of some
grid points predicted with monitor function ̟0 (x, t) ; (c) the same but with
monitor function ̟1 (x, t) . On panel (a) the lines are defined as: (1) —
numerical solution on a uniform fixed grid; (2) — numerical solution predicted
with monitor function ̟0 (x, t) ; (3) — the same with ̟1 (x, t) ; (4) — exact
analytical solution.
We would like to underline that this problem is equivalent to the head-on collision of two
equal solitary waves due to simple symmetry considerations. This ‘generalized’ problem
was studied in the past using experimental [111, 125], numerical [26, 67] and analytical techniques [21, 113, 132]. More recently this problem gained again some interest of researchers
[22, 25, 39, 52, 57, 58, 107, 138]. Despite the simple form of the obstacle, the interaction
process of sufficiently large solitary waves with it takes a highly non-trivial character as it
will be highlighted below.
Figure 5(a) shows the free surface dynamics as it is predicted by the SGN equations
solved numerically using the moving grid with N = 320 nodes. The initial condition
consists of an exact analytical solitary wave (2.29) of amplitude α = 0.4 moving rightwards
to the vertical wall (where the wall boundary condition u = 0 is imposed∗ on the velocity,
for the pressure see Section 2.3.1). The computational domain is chosen to be sufficiently
large [0, ℓ] = [0, 80], so there is no interaction with the boundaries at t = 0. Initially the
solitary wave is located at x0 = 40 (right in the middle). The bottom is flat h(x, t) =
d = const in this test case. From Figure 5(a) it can be clearly seen that the reflection
process generates a train of weakly nonlinear waves which propagate with different speeds
in agreement with the dispersion relation. The moving grid was constructed using the
monitor function ̟1 (x, t) from the previous Section (see the definition in equation (4.2)).
with ϑ0 = ϑ1 = 10. The resulting trajectories of mesh nodes are shown in Figure 5(b).
The grid is clearly refined around the solitary wave and nodes follow it. Moreover, we
∗The
same condition is imposed on the left boundary as well, even if during our simulation time there
are no visible interactions with the left wall boundary.
38 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
(a)
(b)
Figure 5. Solitary wave (amplitude α = 0.4)/vertical wall interaction in the
framework of the SGN equations: (a) space-time plot of the free surface
elevation; (b) nodes trajectories. For the sake of clarity every 5th node is shown
only, the total number of nodes N = 320.
would like to note also a slight mesh refinement even in the dispersive tail behind the
reflected wave (it is not clearly seen in Figure 5(b) since we show only every 5th node).
One of the main interesting characteristics that we can compute from these numerical
experiments is the maximal wave run-up R on the vertical wall:
def
R :=
sup
0 6 t 6 T
{η(ℓ, t)} .
The sup is taken in some time window when the wave/wall interaction takes place. For the
class of incident solitary wave solutions it is clear that maximal run-up R will depend on
the (dimensionless) solitary wave amplitude α. In [132] the following asymptotic formula
was derived in the limit α → 0:
R (α) = 2 α 1 + 14 α + 83 α2 + O(α4 ) .
(4.3)
The last approximation was already checked against full the Euler simulations [39, 67]
and even laboratory experiments [111]. Figure 6 shows the dependence of the maximal
run-up R on the incident solitary wave amplitude α as it is predicted by our numerical
model, by formula (4.3) and several other experimental [42, 110, 111, 144] and numerical
[26, 39, 67] studies. In particular, one can see that almost all models agree fairly well up to
the amplitudes α > 0.4. Then, there is an apparent ‘separation’ of data in two branches.
Again, our numerical model gives a very good agreement with experimental data from
[110, 111, 144] up to the amplitudes α > 0.7.
39 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
2.4
R/d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.0
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
α /d
0.7
Figure 6. Dependence of the maximal run-up R on the amplitude α of the
incident solitary wave. Experimental data: (1) — [144], (2) — [111], (3) — [42],
(4) — [110]. Numerical data: (5) — [67], (6) — [26], (7) — [39]. The solid line
(8) — our numerical results, the dashed line (9) — the analytical prediction (4.3).
4.2.1 Wave action on the wall
The nonlinear dispersive SGN model can be used to estimate also the wave force exerted
on the vertical wall. Moreover, we shall show below that this model is able to capture the
non-monotonic behaviour of the force when the incident wave amplitude is increased. This
effect was first observed experimentally [144] and then numerically [148].
For the 2D case with flat bottom the fluid pressure p(x, y, t) can be expressed:
h H2
(y + d)2 i
p(x, y, t)
R1 ,
= g H − (y + d) −
−
ρ
2
2
def
− d 6 y 6 η(x, t) , (4.4)
with R1 := uxt + u uxx − u2x . The horizontal wave loading exerted on the vertical wall
located at x = ℓ is given by the following integral:
ˆ η(ℓ,t)
F0 (t)
H3
g H2
=
−
R̄1 ,
p(ℓ, y, t) dy =
ρ
2
3
−d
40 / 66
η /d
F/ρgd
2
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
1.5
1.5
1
2
3
4
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
25
30
35
40
45
1
2
3
4
t(g/d)
1/2
25
(a)
30
35
40
45
t(g/d)
1/2
(b)
Figure 7. Solitary wave/vertical wall interaction: (a) time series of wave
run-up on the wall; (b) dynamic wave loading on the wall. Different lines
correspond to different incident solitary wave amplitudes: (1) — α = 0.1, (2) —
α = 0.3, (3) — α = 0.5, (4) — α = 0.7.
where due to boundary conditions R̄1 = uxt − u2x . After removing the hydrostatic force,
we obtain the dynamic wave loading computed in our simulations:
h H2
F(t)
H3
d2 i
−
= g
−
R̄1 .
ρ
2
2
3
The expression for corresponding tilting moment can be found in [52, Remark 3]. Figure 7
shows the wave elevation (a) and the dynamic wave loading (b) on the vertical wall. From
Figure 7(b) it can be seen that the force has one maximum for small amplitude solitary
waves. However, when we gradually increase the amplitude (i.e. α ? 0.4), the second
(local) maximum appears. For such large solitary waves a slight run-down phenomenon
can be noticed in Figure 7(a). We reiterate that this behaviour is qualitatively and quantitatively correct comparing to the full Euler equations [25, 39]. However, the complexity
of the nonlinear dispersive SGN model and, consequently, the numerical algorithm to solve
it, is much lower.
4.3. Solitary wave/bottom step interaction
Water waves undergo continuous changes while propagating over general uneven bottoms.
Namely, the wave length and wave amplitude are modified while propagating over bottom
irregularities. Such transformations have been studied in the literature [44, 98]. In the
present Section we focus on the process of a Solitary Wave (SW) transformation over a
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
41 / 66
bottom step. In the early work by Madsen & Mei (1969) [106] it was shown using long
wave approximation that a solitary wave can be disintegrated into a finite number of SWs
with decreasing amplitudes while passing over an underwater step. This conclusion was
supported in [106] by laboratory data as well. This test case was used later in many works,
see e.g. [29, 53, 99].
We illustrate the behaviour of the adaptive numerical algorithm as well as the SGN
model on the solitary wave/bottom interaction problem. The bottom bathymetry is given
by the following discontinuous function:
(
−h0 , 0 6 x 6 xs ,
y = −h(x) =
−hs , xs < x 6 ℓ ,
where ℓ is the numerical wave tank length, h0 (respectively hs ) are the still water depths
on the left (right) of the step located at x = xs . We assume also that 0 < hs < h0 .
The initial condition is a solitary wave located at x = x0 and propagating rightwards.
For the experiment cleanliness we assume that initially the solitary wave does not ‘feel’ the
step. In other words it is located sufficiently far from the abrupt change in bathymetry. In
our experiment we choose x0 so that η(xs ) > 0.01 α, where α is the SW amplitude. The
main parameters in this problem are the incident wave amplitude α and the bottom step
jump ∆bs = h0 − hs . Various theoretical and experimental studies show that a solitary
wave undergoes a splitting into a reflected wave and a finite number of solitary waves after
passing over an underwater step. See [98] for a recent review on this topic. Amplitudes
and the number of solitary waves over the step were determined in [88] in the framework of
the shallow water theory. These expressions were reported later in [124] and this result was
improved recently in [115]. However, in the vicinity of the step, one may expect important
vertical accelerations of fluid particles, which are simplified (or even neglected) in shallow
water type theories. Nevertheless, in [115] a good agreement of this theory with numerical
and experimental data was reported.
There is also another difficulty inherent to the bottom step modelling. In various derivations of shallow water models there is an implicit assumption that the bathymetry gradient ∇h is bounded (or even small | ∇h | ≪ 1, e.g. in the Boussinesq-type equations
[19]). On the other hand, numerical tests and comparisons with the full (Euler and even
Navier–Stokes) equations for finite values of | ∇h | ∼ O(1) show that resulting approximate models have a larger applicability domain than it was supposed at the outset [19].
In the case of a bottom step, the bathymetry function is even discontinuous which is an
extreme case we study in this Section.
There are two main approaches to cope with this problem. One consists in running
the approximate model directly on discontinuous bathymetry, and the resulting eventual
numerical instabilities are damped out by ad-hoc dissipative terms (see e.g. references
in [115]). The magnitude of these terms allows to increase the scheme dissipation, and
overall computation appears to be stable. The difficulty of this approach consists in the
fine tuning of dissipation, since
• Insufficient dissipation will make the computation unstable,
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
42 / 66
• Excessive dissipation will yield unphysical damping of the solution.
An alternative approach consists in replacing the discontinuous bathymetry by a smoothed
ℓs
ℓs
version over certain length xs −
, where ℓs is the smoothing length on
, xs +
2
2
which the jump from h0 to hs is replaced by a smooth variation. For instance, in all
numerical computations reported in [124] the smoothing length was chosen to be ℓs = 60
cm independently of the water depths before h0 and after hs the step. In another work [66]
the smoothing length was arbitrarily set to ℓs = 20 cm independently of other parameters.
Unfortunately, in a recent work [146] the smoothing procedure was not described at all. Of
course, this method is not perfect since the bathymetry is slightly modified. However, one
can expect that sufficiently long waves will not ‘notice’ this modification. This assumption
was confirmed by the numerical simulations reported in [35, 66, 124].
In the present work we also employ the bottom smoothing procedure. However, the
smoothing length ℓs is chosen in order to have a well-posed problem for the elliptic operator
(2.5). For simplicity, we use the sufficient condition (2.12) (obtained under restriction
(2.11)), which is not necessarily optimal, but it allows us to invert stably the nonlinear
elliptic operator (2.18). Namely, the smoothed step has the following analytical expression:
ℓs
,
−h0 ,
0 6 x 6 xs −
2
ℓs
ℓs
∆bs
y = −h(x) = −h0 +
(4.5)
· 1 + sin ζ , xs −
6 x 6 xs +
,
2
2
2
ℓs
−h ,
xs +
6 x 6 ℓ,
s
2
def π(x − xs )
where ζ :=
. For this bottom profile, the inequalities (2.11), (2.12) take the
ℓs
form:
π π
π ∆bs
,
cos ζ < 1 , ∀ ζ ∈ − ,
2 ℓs
2 2
2
π 2 ∆bs
sin ζ > −
.
2
h
+
h
∆bs
2 ℓs
0
s
−
sin ζ
2
2
These inequalities have corresponding solutions:
π p
π ∆bs
ℓs >
,
ℓs >
h0 ∆bs .
2
2
The last inequalities are verified simultaneously if the second inequality is true. If we
assume that the bottom step height ∆bs is equal to the half of the water depth before it,
then we obtain the following condition:
π
ℓs > √ h0 ≈ 1.11 h0 .
2 2
We underline that the last condition is only sufficient and stable numerical computations
can most probably be performed even for shorter smoothing lengths ℓs . For instance, we
tested the value ℓs = h0 and everything went smoothly.
43 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
Parameter
Value
Wave tank length, ℓ
35 m
3.65 cm
Solitary wave amplitude, α
11 m
Solitary wave initial position, x0
20 cm
Water depth before the step, h0
Water depth after the step, hs
10 cm
h0
Water depth used in scaling, d
10 cm
Bottom step jump, ∆bs
Bottom step location, xs
14 m
350
Number of grid points, N
17.6 s
Simulation time, T
Table 2. Values of various numerical parameters used in the solitary
wave/bottom step interaction test case.
In [124] the results of 80 experiments are reported for various values of α and h0 (for fixed
values of the bottom jump ∆bs = 10 cm). In our work we repeated all experiments from
[124] using the SGN equations solved numerically with the adaptive predictor–corrector algorithm described above. In general, we obtained a very good agreement with experimental
data from [124] in terms of the following control parameters:
• number of solitary waves moving over the step,
• amplitudes of solitary waves over the step,
• amplitude of the (main) reflected wave.
We notice that the amplitude of the largest solitary wave over the step corresponds perfectly
to the measurements. However, the variation in the amplitude of subsequent solitary waves
over the step could reach in certain cases 20%.
Remark 4. The conduction of laboratory experiments on the solitary wave/bottom step
interaction encounters a certain number of technical difficulties [27, 124] that we would like
to mention. First of all, the wave maker generates a solitary wave with some dispersive
components. Moreover, one has to take the step sufficiently long so that the transmitted
wave has enough time to develop into a finite number of visible well-separated solitary waves.
Finally, the reflections of the opposite wave flume’s wall are to be avoided as well in order
not to pollute the measurements. Consequently, the successful conduction of experiments
and accurate measurement of wave characteristics requires a certain level of technique. We
would like to mention the exemplary experimental work [78] on the head-on collision of
solitary waves.
Below we focus on one particular case of α = 3.65 cm. All other parameters are
given in Table 2. It corresponds to the experiment N◦ 24 from [124]. The free surface
dynamics is depicted in Figure 8(a) and the trajectories of every second grid node are
44 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
(a)
(b)
Figure 8. Interaction of a solitary wave with an underwater step: (a)
space-time plot of the free surface elevation y = η(x, t) in the dimensional time
interval [0 s, 17.6 s]; (b) trajectories of every second grid node. Numerical
parameters are provided in Table 2.
shown in Figure 8(b). For the mesh adaptation we use the monitor function (4.2) with
ϑ1 = ϑ2 = 10 . In particular, one can see that three solitary waves are generated over
the step. This fact agrees well with the theoretical predictions [88, 115]. Moreover, one
can see that the distribution of grid points follows perfectly all generated waves (over the
step and the reflected wave). Figure 9(a) shows the free surface dynamics in the vicinity
of the bottom step. In particular, one can see that the wave becomes notoriously steep
by the time instance t = 3 s and during later times it splits into one reflected and three
transmitted waves. The free surface profile at the final simulation time y = η(x, T ) is
depicted in Figure 9(b). On the same panel the experimental measurements are shown
with empty circles ◦ , which show a very good agreement with our numerical simulations.
In our numerical experiments we go even further since a nonlinear dispersive wave model
(such as the SGN equations employed in this study) can provide also information about
the internal structure of the flow (i.e. beneath the free surface). For instance, the nonhydrostatic component of the pressure field can be easily reconstructed∗:
h η + y + 2h
i
pd (x, y, t)
= −(η − y)
· R1 + R2 ,
−h(x) 6 y 6 η(x, t) . (4.6)
ρ
2
where the quantities R1,2 are defined in (2.3) as (see also the complete derivation in [92]):
R1 = uxt + u uxx − ux2 ,
R2 = ut hx + u [ u hx ]x .
∗Please,
notice that formula (4.4) is not applicable here, since the bottom is not flat anymore.
45 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
η /d
η /d
0.20
0.25
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.15
0.10
0.20
1
2
0.15
0.05
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.00
-0.05
60
70
(a)
80
x/d
140
150
160
170
x/d
(b)
Figure 9. Free surface profiles y = η(x, t) during the interaction process of a
solitary wave with an underwater step: (a) initial condition (1), t = 1.5 s (2),
t = 2.0 s (3), t = 2.5 s (4), t = 3.0 s (5), smoothed bottom profile given by
formula (4.5) (6); (b) free surface profile y = η(x, T ) (1) at the final simulation
time t = T . The experimental points (2) are taken from [124], experiment
N◦ 24. Numerical parameters are provided in Table 2.
We do not consider the hydrostatic pressure component since its variation is linear with
water depth y:
ph = ρ g (η − y) .
Even if the dispersive pressure component pd might be negligible comparing to the hydrostatic one ph , its presence is crucial to balance the effects of nonlinearity, which results
in the existence of solitary waves, as one of the most widely known effects in dispersive
wave propagation [48]. The dynamic pressure field and several other physical quantities
under a solitary wave were computed and represented graphically in the framework of the
full Euler equations in [51]. A good qualitative agreement with our results can be reported. The balance of dispersive and nonlinear effects results also in the symmetry of
the non-hydrostatic pressure distribution with respect to the wave crest. It can be seen in
Figure 10(a,d ) before and after the interaction process. On the other hand, during the interaction process the symmetry is momentaneously broken (see Figure 10(b,c)). However,
with the time going on, the system relaxes again to a symmetric∗ pressure distribution
shown in Figure 10(d ).
Knowledge of the solution
to the SGN equations allows to reconstruct also the velocity
†
field ũ(x, y, t), ṽ(x, y, t) in the fluid bulk. Under the additional assumption that the
∗The
†This
symmetry here is understood with respect to the vertical axis passing by the wave crest.
information can be used later to compute fluid particle trajectories [69], for example.
46 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
pd /ρ gd
y/d
0.005
0.002
-0.000
-0.003
-0.005
-0.008
-0.010
-0.013
-0.015
-0.018
0.2
0.0
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.4
56
0.005
0.003
0.001
-0.001
-0.003
-0.006
-0.008
-0.010
-0.012
-0.014
0.2
-0.2
54
pd /ρgd
y/d
x/d
58
68
70
(a)
(b)
pd /ρ gd
y/d
0.007
0.004
0.001
-0.002
-0.005
-0.008
-0.011
-0.014
-0.017
-0.021
0.2
0.0
0.0
-0.4
-0.4
(c)
80
x/d
0.011
0.004
-0.004
-0.011
-0.018
-0.025
-0.032
-0.040
-0.047
-0.054
0.2
-0.2
78
pd /ρgd
y/d
-0.2
76
x/d
72
164
166
168
x/d
(d)
Figure 10. Non-hydrostatic pressure distribution during a solitary
wave/underwater step interaction process at different instances of time: (a)
t = 0.1 s, (b) t = 2.0 s, (c) t = 3.0 s, (d) t = 17.5 s. Numerical parameters
are provided in Table 2.
flow is potential, one can derive the following asymptotic (neglecting the terms of the order
4
2
O(µ4 ) ≡ O λd4 in the horizontal velocity ũ(x, y, t) and of the order O(µ2 ) ≡ O λd2 for
the vertical one ṽ(x, y, t)) representation formula [64] (see also the derivation in [92] for
47 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
y/d
y/d
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
-0.2
-0.2
-0.4
-0.4
-0.6
65
70
x/d
75
(a)
-0.6
60
70
x/d
80
(b)
Figure 11. Reconstructed velocity field in the fluid during the solitary wave
interaction process with an underwater step: (a) t = 2.0 s , (b) t = 3.0 s . Solid
blue lines show a few streamlines. Numerical parameters are provided in Table 2.
the 3D case with moving bottom):
ũ(x, y, t) = u +
H2
(y + h)2
uxx ,
− y − h · [ u hx ]x + ux hx +
−
2
6
2
(4.7)
H
ṽ(x, y, t) = −u hx − (y + h) ux .
(4.8)
The formulas above allow to compute the velocity vector field in the fluid domain at any
time (when the solution H(x, t), u(x, t) is available) and in any point (x, y) above the
bottom y = −h(x) and beneath the free surface y = η(x, t) . Figure 11 shows a numerical
application of this reconstruction technique at two different moments of time t = 2 and 3
s during the interaction process with the bathymetry change. In particular, in Figure 11(a)
one can see that important vertical particle velocities emerge during the interaction with
the bottom step. In subsequent time moments one can see the division of the flow in two
structures (see Figure 11(b)): the left one corresponds to the reflected wave, while the
right structure corresponds to the transmitted wave motion. The reconstructed velocity
fields via the SGN model compare fairly well with the 2D Navier–Stokes predictions
[115]. However, the computational complexity of our approach is significantly lower than
the simulation of the full Navier–Stokes equations. This is probably the main advantage
of the proposed modelling methodology.
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
48 / 66
4.4. Wave generation by an underwater landslide
As the last illustration of the proposed above numerical scheme, we model wave generation by the motion of an underwater landslide over uneven bottom. This test-case is
very challenging since it involves rapid bottom motion (at least of its part). We recall
that all previous tests were performed on a static bottom (i.e. ht ≡ 0 ). The numerical simulation of underwater landslides is an important application where the inclusion
of non-hydrostatic effects is absolutely crucial [105]. Moreover, the accurate prediction of
generated waves allows to assess more accurately the natural hazard induced by unstable
sliding masses (rockfalls, debris, ground movements) [140].
Usually, the precise location of unstable underwater masses is unknown and the numerical simulation is a preferred tool to study these processes. The landslide can be modelled
as a solid undeformable body moving down the slope [34, 60, 74, 142]. Another possibility
consists in representing the landslide as another fluid layer of higher density (possibly also
viscosity) located near the bottom [23, 68]. In some works the landslide motion was not
simulated (e.g. [86]) and the initial wave field generated by the landslide motion was determined using empirical formulas [73]. Then, this initial condition was propagated using
an appropriate water wave model [86]. However, strictly speaking the employed empirical
models are valid only for an absolutely rigid landslide sliding down a constant slope. Subsequent numerical simulations showed that the bottom shape influences quite substantially
the generated wave field [13]. Consequently, for realistic modelling of real world cases one
needs to take into account the actual bathymetry [103] and even possible deformations of
the landslide during its motion [102]. In a recent experimental work [102] the deformability of the landslide was achieved by composing it with four solid parts interconnected
by springs. The idea to represent a landslide as a finite number of blocks was used in
numerical [119] and theoretical [137] investigations. In the present study we use the quasideformable∗ landslide model [12, 56, 59]. In this model the landslide deforms according to
encountered bathymetry changes, however, at every time instance, all components of the
velocity vector are the same in all particles which constitute the landslide (as in a solid
rigid body). We shall use two long wave models:
• The SGN equations (fully nonlinear non-hydrostatic weakly dispersive model)
• NSWE equations† (standard hydrostatic dispersionless model)
The advantage of the SGN equations over other frequently used long wave models [86, 105,
141] are:
• The Galilean invariance
• The energy balance equation (consistent with the full Euler [65])
NSWE were employed in [5] to model the real world 16th October 1979 Nice event. It looks
like the consensus on the importance of dispersive effects in landslide modeling is far from
∗This
†The
[94].
model can be visualized if you imagine a landslide composed of infinitely many solid blocks.
numerical algorithm to solve NSW equations on a moving grid was presented and validated in
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
49 / 66
being achieved. For example, in [86] the authors affirm that the inclusion of dispersion
gives results very similar to NSWE. In other works [71, 104, 133] the authors state that
dispersive effects significantly influence the resulting wave field, especially during long
time propagation. Consequently, in the present study we use both the SGN and NSWE
equations to shed some light on the rôle of dispersive effects.
Consider a 1D fluid domain bounded from below by the solid (static) impermeable
bottom given by the following function:
h+ + h−
h+ − h−
h0 (x) =
+
tanh ̥(x − ξ̥ ) ,
(4.9)
2
2
where h+ and h− are water depths at ± ∞ correspondingly (the domain we take is finite,
of course). We assume for definiteness that
h+ < h− < 0 .
We have also by definition
hh − h i
1
2 tan θ0
def
def
0
+
> 0,
ξ̥ :=
> 0,
ln
̥ :=
h− − h+
2̥
h− − h+
where h0 ≡ h0 (0) is water depth in x = 0 and θ0 is the maximal slope angle, which is
reached at the inflection point ξ̥ . It can be easily checked that
h+ + h−
< h0 < h− .
2
Equation (4.9) gives us the static part of the bottom shape. The following equation prescribes the shape of the bathymetry including the unsteady component:
y = −h(x, t) = h0 (x) + ζ(x, t) ,
where function ζ(x, t) prescribes the landslide shape. In the present study we assume that
the landslide initial shape is given by the following analytical formula:
h 2 π x − x (0) i
~
ν
c
1 + cos
, | x − xc (0) | 6
,
2
ν
2
ζ(x, 0) =
ν
0 ,
,
| x − xc (0) | >
2
where xc (0), ~ and ν are initial landslide position, height and width (along the axis Ox)
correspondingly. Initially we put the landslide at the unique∗ point where the water depth
is equal to h0 = 100 m, i.e.
hh − h i
1
0
+
≈ 8 323.5 m .
ln
xc (0) = ξ̥ −
2̥
h− − h+
For t > 0 the landslide position xc (t) and its velocity v(t) are determined by solving
a second order ordinary differential equation which describes the balance of all the forces
acting on the sliding mass [12]. This model is well described in the literature [56, 59] and
we do not reproduce the details here.
∗This
point is unique since the static bathymetry h0 (x) is a monotonically increasing function of its
argument x .
50 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
Parameter
Value
Fluid domain length, ℓ
80 000 m
−5.1 m
Water depth, h0 (0)
−500 m
Rightmost water depth, h+
−5 m
Leftmost water depth, h−
Maximal bottom slope, θ0
6◦
20 m
Landslide height, ~
5000 m
Landslide length, ν
Initial landslide position, xc (0)
8 323.5 m
1.0
Added mass coefficient, Cw
1.0
Hydrodynamic resistance coefficient, Cd
1.5
Landslide density, ρsl /ρw
∗
Friction angle, θ
1◦
1000 s
Final simulation time, T
400
Number of grid points, N
Monitor function parameter, ϑ0
200
Table 3. Numerical and physical parameters used in landslide simulation.
In Figure 12(a) we show the dynamics of the moving bottom from the initial condition
at t = 0 to the final simulation time t = T . All parameters are given in Table 3. It
can be clearly seen that landslide’s motion significantly depends on the underlying static
bottom shape. In Figure 12(b) we show landslide’s barycenter trajectory x = xc (t) (line
1), its velocity v = v(t) (line 2) and finally the static bottom profile y = h0 (x) (line
3). From the landslide speed plot in Figure 12(b) (line 2), one can see that the mass is
accelerating during the first 284.2 s and slows down during 613.4 s. The distances traveled
by the landslide during these periods have approximatively the same ratio ≈ 2 . It is
also interesting to notice that the landslide stops abruptly its motion with a negative (i.e.
nonzero) acceleration.
In order to simulate water waves generated by the landslide, we take the fluid domain
I = [0, ℓ]. For simplicity, we prescribe wall boundary conditions∗ at x = 0 and x = ℓ.
Undisturbed water depth at both ends is h0 and ≈ h+ respectively. The computational
domain length ℓ is chosen to be sufficiently large to avoid any kind of reflections from the
right boundary. Initially the fluid is at rest with undisturbed free surface, i.e.
η(x, 0) ≡ 0 ,
∗It
u(x, 0) ≡ 0 .
would be better to prescribe transparent boundary conditions here, but this question is totally open
for the SGN equations.
51 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
0
900
10
v, m/s
20
30
t, s
3
0
y, m
1
600
-200
300
2
-400
0
(a)
0
10000
20000
x, m
(b)
Figure 12. Generation of surface waves by an underwater landslide motion: (a)
dynamics of the moving bottom; (b) graphics of functions (1) x = xc (t) , (2)
v = v(t) , (3) y = h0 (x) . Two outer red circles denote landslide initial t = 0
and terminal t = 897.6 s positions. Middle red circle denotes landslide position
at the moment of time t = 284.2 s where landslide’s speed is maximal
vmax ≈ 26.3 m/s . The black square shows the inflection point ξ̥ position. The
maximal speed is achieved well below the inflection point ξ̥ . Numerical
parameters are given in Table 3.
Segment I is discretized using N = 400 points. In order to redistribute optimally mesh
nodes, we employ the monitor function defined in equation (4.1), which refines the grid
where the waves are large (regardless whether they are of elevation or depression type).
In Figure 13 we show the surface y = η(x, t) in space-time, which shows the main
features of the generated wave field. The left panel (a) is the dispersive SGN prediction,
while (b) is the computation with NSWE that we include into this study for the sake
of comparison. For instance, one can see that the dispersive wave system is much more
complex even if NSWE seem to reproduce the principal wave components. The dispersive
components follow the main wave travelling rightwards. There is also at least one depression wave moving towards the shore. The motion of grid points is shown in Figure 14. The
initial grid was chosen to be uniform, since the free surface was initially flat. However,
during the wave generation process the grid adapts to the solution. The numerical method
redistributes the nodes according to the chosen monitor function ̟0 [ η ] (x, t) , i.e. where
the waves are large (regardless whether they are of elevation or depression type). We would
like to underline the fact that in order to achieve a similar accuracy on a uniform grid, one
would need about 4 N points.
In Figure 15 we show two snapshots of the free surface elevation at two moments of time
(a) and wave gauge records collected at two different spatial locations (b). In particular,
52 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
(a)
(b)
Figure 13. Generation of surface waves y = η(x, t) by an underwater
landslide motion: (a) the SGN model (dispersive); (b) NSWE equations
(dispersionless). Numerical parameters are given in Table 3.
we observe that there is a better agreement between NSWE and the SGN model in shallow
regions (i.e. towards x = 0), while a certain divergence between two models becomes
more apparent in deeper regions (towards the right end x = ℓ).
In the previous Section 4.3 we showed the internal flow structure during nonlinear transformations of a solitary wave over a static step. In this Section we show that SGN equations
can be used to reconstruct and to study the physical fields in situations where the bottom
moves abruptly. In order to reconstruct the non-hydrostatic field between moving bottom
and the free surface, one can use formula (4.6), but the quantity R2 has some extra terms
due to the bottom motion:
R2 = ut hx + u [ u hx ]x + htt + 2 u hxt .
In Figure 16 we show the non-hydrostatic pressure field at two different moments of time.
More precisely, we show a zoom on the area of interest around the landslide only. In panel
(a) t = t1 = 150 s and the landslide barycenter is located at xc (t1 ) = 9456 m . Landslide
moves downhill with the speed v(t1 ) = 15.72 m/s and it continues to accelerate. In particular, one can see that there is a zone of positive pressure in front of the landslide and a zone
of negative pressure just behind. This fact has implications on the fluid particle trajectories
around the landslide. In right panel (b) we show the moment of time t = t2 = 400 s .
At this moment xc (t2 ) = 15 264 m and v(t2 ) = 21.4 m/s . The non-hydrostatic pressure
distribution qualitatively changed. Zones of positive and negative pressure switched their
respective positions. Moreover, in Figure 15 we showed that dispersive effects start to be
noticeable at the free surface only after t > 400 s and by t = 800 s they are flagrant.
In Figure 17 we show the velocity fields in the fluid bulk at corresponding moments of
53 / 66
t, s
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
800
600
400
200
0
0
20000
40000
60000
x, m
Figure 14. Trajectories of every second grid node during the underwater
landslide simulation in the framework of the SGN equations. Numerical
parameters are given in Table 3.
time t1 and t2 . We notice some similarities between the fluid flow around a landslide with
an air flow around an airfoil. To our knowledge the internal hydrodynamics of landslide
generated waves on a general non-constant sloping bottom and in the framework of SGN
equations has not been shown before.
We remind that in the presence of moving bottom one should use the following reconstruction formulas for the velocity field (which are slightly different from (4.7), (4.8)):
H2
(y + h)2
uxx ,
− y − h · [ ht + u hx ]x + ux hx +
−
2
6
2
ṽ(x, y, t) = −ht − u hx − (y + h) ux .
ũ(x, y, t) = u +
H
54 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
y, m
y, m
1
2
3
4
2
3
0
0
-3
-2
1
2
3
4
-6
-4
-9
0
20000
40000
60000
0
x, m
200
(a)
400
600
800
t, s
(b)
Figure 15. Generation of surface waves by an underwater landslide: (a) free
surface elevation profiles y = η(x, t1, 2 ) at t1 = 300 s (1,3) and t2 = 800 s
(2,4); (b) free surface elevation y = η(x1, 2 , t) as a function of time in two
spatial locations x1 = 20000 m (1,3) and x2 = 40000 m (2,4). The SGN
predictions are represented with solid lines (1,2) and NSWE with dashed lines
(3,4). Numerical parameters are given in Table 3.
y, m
pd , kPa
y, m
pd , kPa
0.0
41.780
35.960
30.140
24.320
18.500
12.681
6.861
1.041
-4.779
-10.599
0.0
41.780
35.960
30.140
24.320
18.500
12.681
6.861
1.041
-4.779
-10.599
-100.0
-200.0
-100.0
-200.0
-300.0
-300.0
-400.0
-400.0
-500.0
-500.0
5000
7500
10000
(a)
12500
x, m
12500
15000
17500
x, m
20000
(b)
Figure 16. Generation of surface waves by an underwater landslide. Isolines of
the non-hydrostatic pressure at two moments of time: t = 150 s (a); t = 400 s
(b). Numerical parameters are given in Table 3.
55 / 66
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
y, m
y, m
0.0
0.0
-100.0
-100.0
-200.0
-200.0
-300.0
-300.0
-400.0
-400.0
-500.0
-500.0
5000
7500
10000
(a)
12500
x, m
12500
15000
17500
x, m
20000
(b)
Figure 17. Generation of surface waves by an underwater landslide. The
reconstructed velocity field at two moments of time: t = 150 s (a); t = 400 s
(b). Numerical parameters are given in Table 3.
These formulas naturally become (4.7), (4.8) if the bottom is static, i.e. ht ≡ 0 .
5. Discussion
Above we presented a detailed description of the numerical algorithm and a number of
numerical tests which illustrate its performance. The main conclusions and perspectives
of this study are outlined below.
5.1. Conclusions
In the second part of our series of papers we focused on the development of numerical
algorithms for shallow water propagation over globally flat spaces (i.e. we allow some
variations of the bathymetry in the limits discussed in Section 2.1). The main distinction
of our work is that the proposed algorithm allows for local mesh adaptivity by moving
the grid points where they are needed. The performance of our method was illustrated
on several test cases ranging from purely academic ones (e.g. propagation of a solitary
waves, which allowed us to estimate the overall accuracy of the scheme) to more realistic
applications with landslide-generated waves [12]. The mathematical model chosen in this
study allows us to have a look into the distribution of various physical fields in the fluid
bulk. In particular, in some interesting cases we reconstructed the velocity field and the
hydrostatic pressure distribution beneath the free surface.
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
56 / 66
We studied the linear stability of the proposed finite volume discretization. It was shown
that the resulting scheme possesses an interesting and possible counter-intuitive property:
smaller we take the spatial discretization step ∆x, less restrictive is becoming the stability
CFL-type condition on the time step τ . This result was obtained using the classical von
Neumann analysis [28]. However, we show (and we compute it) that there exists the upper
limit of allowed time steps. Numerical schemes with such properties seem to be new.
We considered also in great detail the question of wall boundary conditions∗ for the SGN
system. It seems that this issue was not properly addressed before. The wall boundary
condition for the elliptic part of equations follows naturally from the form of the momentum
equation we chose in this study.
Finally, in numerical experiments we showed how depth-integrated SGN equations can
be used to study nonlinear transformations of water waves over some bathymetric features
(such as an underwater step or a sliding mass). Moreover, we illustrated clearly that SGN
equations (and several other approximate dispersive wave models) can be successfully used
to reconstruct the flow field under the wave. The accuracy of this reconstruction will be
studied in future works by direct comparisons with the full Euler equations where these
quantities are resolved.
5.2. Perspectives
The main focus of our study was set on the adaptive spatial discretization. The first
natural continuation of our study is the generalization to 3D physical problems (i.e. involving two horizontal dimensions). The main difficulty is to generalize the mesh motion
algorithm to this case, even if some ideas have been proposed in the literature [6].
In the present computations the time step was chosen to ensure the linear CFL condition.
In other words, it was chosen in order to satisfy the numerical solution stability. In future
works we would like to incorporate an adaptive time stepping procedure along the lines of
e.g. [130] aimed to meet the prescribed error tolerance. Of course, the extension of the
numerical method presented in this study to three-dimensional flows (i.e. two horizontal
dimensions) represents the main important extension of our work. Further improvement
of the numerical algorithm can be expected if we include also some bathymetric features
(such as ∇h) into the monitor function ̟[η, h](x, t) . Physically this improvement is fully
justified since water waves undergo constant transformations over bottom irregularities (as
illustrated in Sections 4.3 & 4.4). A priori, everything is ready to perform these further
numerical experiments.
Ideally, we would like to generalize the algorithm presented in this study for the Serre–
Green–Naghdi (SGN) equations to the base model in its most general form (1.3), (1.4).
In this way we would be able to incorporate several fully nonlinear shallow water models
(discussed in Part I [91]) in the same numerical framework. It would allow the great
∗The
x=ℓ
wall boundary condition for the velocity component u(x, t) is straightforward, i.e. u(x, t)|x = 0 =
0. However, there was an open question of how to prescribe the boundary conditions for the elliptic part
of the equations.
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
57 / 66
flexibility in applications to choose and to assess the performance of various approximate
models.
Moreover, in the present study we raised the question of boundary conditions for SGN
equations. However, non-reflecting (or transparent) boundary conditions would allow to
take much smaller domains in many applications. Unfortunately, this question is totally
open to our knowledge for the SGN equations (however, it is well understood for NSWE).
In future works we plan to fill in this gap as well.
Finally, the SGN equations possess a number of variational structures. The Hamiltonian formulation can be found e.g. in [87]. Various Lagrangians can be found in
[38, 63, 95, 112]. Recently, a multi-symplectic formulation for SGN equations has been
proposed [32]. All these available variational structures raise an important question: after
the discretization can we preserve them at the discrete level as well? It opens beautiful
perspectives for the development of structure-preserving numerical methods as it was done
for the classical Korteweg–de Vries [50] and nonlinear Schrödinger [31] equations.
In the following parts of this series of papers we shall discuss the derivation of the SGN
equations on a sphere [91] and their numerical simulation using the finite volume method
[93].
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by RSCF project No 14–17–00219. The authors would
like to thank Prof. Emmanuel Audusse (Université Paris 13, France) who brought our
attention to the problem of boundary conditions for the SGN equations.
A. Derivation of the non-hydrostatic pressure equation
In this Appendix we give some hints for the derivation of the non-hydrostatic pressure
equation (2.5) and relation (2.9). Let us start with the latter. For this purpose we rewrite
equation (2.8) in a more compact form using the total derivative operator:
Du = −g ∇η +
∇℘ − ̺∇h
,
(A.1)
H
and ̺ (see equations (2.3) and (2.4) corre-
By definition of non-hydrostatic quantities ℘
spondingly) we obtain:
3℘
H
̺ =
+
R2 .
2H
4
We have to substitute into the last relation the expression for R2 :
R2 = (Du) · ∇h + u · (u · ∇)∇h + htt + 2 u · ∇ht ,
along with the expression (A.1) for the horizontal acceleration Du of fluid particles. After
simple algebraic computations one obtains (2.9).
58 / 66
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
The derivation of equation (2.5) is somehow similar. First, from definitions (2.3), (2.4)
we obtain another relation between non-hydrostatic pressures:
H3
H
R1 +
̺,
12
2
with R1 rewritten in the following form:
℘
(A.2)
=
R1 = ∇ · (Du) − 2 (∇ · u)2 + 2
u 1 x1 u 1 x2
.
u 2 x1 u 2 x2
Substituting into equation (A.2) the just shown relation (2.9) with the last expression for
R1 , yields the required equation (2.5).
B. Acronyms
In the text above the reader could encounter the following acronyms:
SW: Solitary Wave
AMR: Adaptive Mesh Refinement
BBM: Benjamin–Bona–Mahony
BVP: Boundary Value Problem
CFL: Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy
IVP: Initial Value Problem
MOL: Method Of Lines
ODE: Ordinary Differential Equation
PDE: Partial Differential Equation
SGN: Serre–Green–Naghdi
TVD: Total Variation Diminishing
NSWE: Nonlinear Shallow Water Equations
References
[1] G. B. Alalykin, S. K. Godunov, L. L. Kireyeva, and L. A. Pliner. Solution of OneDimensional Problems in Gas Dynamics on Moving Grids. Nauka, Moscow, 1970. 5
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
59 / 66
[2] J. S. Antunes Do Carmo, F. J. Seabra Santos, and E. Barthélemy. Surface waves propagation
in shallow water: A finite element model. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 16(6):447–459, mar
1993. 6
[3] C. Arvanitis and A. I. Delis. Behavior of Finite Volume Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation
Laws on Adaptive Redistributed Spatial Grids. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 28(5):1927–1956,
jan 2006. 16
[4] C. Arvanitis, T. Katsaounis, and C. Makridakis. Adaptive Finite Element Relaxation
Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 35(1):17–33, 2010. 16
[5] S. Assier-Rzadkieaicz, P. Heinrich, P. C. Sabatier, B. Savoye, and J. F. Bourillet. Numerical
Modelling of a Landslide-generated Tsunami: The 1979 Nice Event. Pure Appl. Geophys.,
157(10):1707–1727, oct 2000. 48
[6] B. N. Azarenok, S. A. Ivanenko, and T. Tang. Adaptive Mesh Redistibution Method Based
on Godunov’s Scheme. Commun. Math. Sci., 1(1):152–179, 2003. 56
[7] N. S. Bakhvalov. The optimization of methods of solving boundary value problems with
a boundary layer. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 9(4):139–
166, jan 1969. 5, 16
[8] V. B. Barakhnin and G. S. Khakimzyanov. On the algorithm for one nonlinear dispersive
shallow-water model. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 12(4):293–317, 1997. 6
[9] V. B. Barakhnin and G. S. Khakimzyanov. The splitting technique as applied to the solution
of the nonlinear dispersive shallow-water equations. Doklady Mathematics, 59(1):70–72,
1999. 6, 11
[10] T. J. Barth and M. Ohlberger. Finite Volume Methods: Foundation and Analysis. In
E. Stein, R. de Borst, and T. J. R. Hughes, editors, Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, nov 2004. 22
[11] E. Barthélémy. Nonlinear shallow water theories for coastal waves. Surveys in Geophysics,
25:315–337, 2004. 6
[12] S. A. Beisel, L. B. Chubarov, D. Dutykh, G. S. Khakimzyanov, and N. Y. Shokina. Simulation of surface waves generated by an underwater landslide in a bounded reservoir. Russ.
J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 27(6):539–558, 2012. 48, 49, 55
[13] S. A. Beisel, L. B. Chubarov, and G. S. Khakimzyanov. Simulation of surface waves generated by an underwater landslide moving over an uneven slope. Russ. J. Numer. Anal.
Math. Modelling, 26(1):17–38, 2011. 48
[14] T. B. Benjamin, J. L. Bona, and J. J. Mahony. Model equations for long waves in nonlinear
dispersive systems. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London Ser. A, 272:47–78, 1972. 6
[15] M. J. Berger, D. L. George, R. J. LeVeque, and K. T. Mandli. The GeoClaw software for
depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement. Advances in Water Resources, 34(9):1195–
1206, sep 2011. 5
[16] N. Bohr. Über die Serienspektra der Element. Zeitschrift für Physik, 2(5):423–469, oct
1920. 9
[17] J. L. Bona, V. A. Dougalis, and O. A. Karakashian. Fully discrete Galerkin methods for the
Korteweg-de Vries equation. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 12(7):859–884,
jul 1986. 6
[18] P. Bonneton, F. Chazel, D. Lannes, F. Marche, and M. Tissier. A splitting approach for the
fully nonlinear and weakly dispersive Green-Naghdi model. J. Comput. Phys., 230:1479–
1498, 2011. 6
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
60 / 66
[19] M.-O. Bristeau, N. Goutal, and J. Sainte-Marie. Numerical simulations of a non-hydrostatic
shallow water model. Comput. & Fluids, 47(1):51–64, aug 2011. 41
[20] M. Brocchini. A reasoned overview on Boussinesq-type models: the interplay between
physics, mathematics and numerics. Proc. R. Soc. A, 469(2160):20130496, oct 2013. 5
[21] J. G. B. Byatt-Smith. The reflection of a solitary wave by a vertical wall. J. Fluid Mech.,
197:503–521, 1988. 37
[22] F. Carbone, D. Dutykh, J. M. Dudley, and F. Dias. Extreme wave run-up on a vertical cliff.
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40(12):3138–3143, 2013. 37
[23] M. J. Castro, M. de la Asuncion, J. Macias, C. Parés, E. D. Fernandez-Nieto, J. M. GonzalezVida, and T. Morales de Luna. IFCP Riemann solver: Application to tsunami modelling
using CPUs. In M. E. Vazquez-Cendon, A. Hidalgo, P. Garcia-Navarro, and L. Cea, editors, Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Equations: Theory and Applications, pages 237–244.
CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Leiden, 2013. 48
[24] V. Casulli. A semi-implicit finite difference method for non-hydrostatic, free-surface flows.
Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 30(4):425–440, jun 1999. 6
[25] J. Chambarel, C. Kharif, and J. Touboul. Head-on collision of two solitary waves and
residual falling jet formation. Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 16:111–122, 2009. 37, 40
[26] R. K.-C. Chan and R. L. Street. A computer study of finite-amplitude water waves. J.
Comp. Phys., 6(1):68–94, aug 1970. 37, 38, 39
[27] K.-A. Chang, T.-J. Hsu, and P. L.-F. Liu. Vortex generation and evolution in water waves
propagating over a submerged rectangular obstacle. Coastal Engineering, 44(1):13–36, sep
2001. 43
[28] J. G. Charney, R. Fjörtoft, and J. Neumann. Numerical Integration of the Barotropic
Vorticity Equation. Tellus, 2(4):237–254, nov 1950. 29, 56
[29] F. Chazel. Influence of bottom topography on long water waves. M2AN, 41:771–799, 2007.
41
[30] F. Chazel, D. Lannes, and F. Marche. Numerical simulation of strongly nonlinear and
dispersive waves using a Green-Naghdi model. J. Sci. Comput., 48:105–116, 2011. 6
[31] J.-B. Chen, M.-Z. Qin, and Y.-F. Tang. Symplectic and multi-symplectic methods for the
nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 43(8-9):1095–
1106, apr 2002. 57
[32] M. Chhay, D. Dutykh, and D. Clamond. On the multi-symplectic structure of the SerreGreen-Naghdi equations. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen, 49(3):03LT01, jan 2016. 57
[33] A. Chorin. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comp., 22:745–762,
1968. 8
[34] L. B. Chubarov, S. V. Eletsky, Z. I. Fedotova, and G. S. Khakimzyanov. Simulation of surface waves by an underwater landslide. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 20(5):425–
437, 2005. 48
[35] L. B. Chubarov, Z. I. Fedotova, Y. I. Shokin, and B. G. Einarsson. Comparative Analysis
of Nonlinear Dispersive Shallow Water Models. Int. J. Comp. Fluid Dyn., 14(1):55–73, jan
2000. 6, 42
[36] L. B. Chubarov and Y. I. Shokin. The numerical modelling of long wave propagation in the
framework of non-linear dispersion models. Comput. & Fluids, 15(3):229–249, jan 1987.
[37] R. Cienfuegos, E. Barthélemy, and P. Bonneton. A fourth-order compact finite volume
scheme for fully nonlinear and weakly dispersive Boussinesq-type equations. Part II: boundary conditions and validation. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 53(9):1423–1455, mar 2007. 6
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
61 / 66
[38] D. Clamond and D. Dutykh. Practical use of variational principles for modeling water
waves. Phys. D, 241(1):25–36, 2012. 57
[39] M. J. Cooker, P. D. Weidman, and D. S. Bale. Reflection of a high-amplitude solitary wave
at a vertical wall. J. Fluid Mech., 342:141–158, 1997. 37, 38, 39, 40
[40] R. Courant, K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy. Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der
mathematischen Physik. Mathematische Annalen, 100(1):32–74, 1928. 26
[41] M. H. Dao and P. Tkalich. Tsunami propagation modelling - a sensitivity study. Nat.
Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 7:741–754, 2007. 32
[42] V. H. Davletshin. Force action of solitary waves on vertical structures. In Tsunami meeting,
pages 41–43, Gorky, 1984. Institute of Applied Physics. 38, 39
[43] A. J. C. de Saint-Venant. Théorie du mouvement non-permanent des eaux, avec application
aux crues des rivières et à l’introduction des marées dans leur lit. C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris,
73:147–154, 1871. 6, 8, 9
[44] M. W. Dingemans. Water wave propagation over uneven bottom. World Scientific, Singapore,
1997. 40
[45] V. A. Dougalis and O. A. Karakashian. On Some High-Order Accurate Fully Discrete
Galerkin Methods for the Korteweg-de Vries Equation. Mathematics of Computation,
45(172):329, oct 1985. 6
[46] V. A. Dougalis and D. E. Mitsotakis. Theory and numerical analysis of Boussinesq systems:
A review. In N. A. Kampanis, V. A. Dougalis, and J. A. Ekaterinaris, editors, Effective
Computational Methods in Wave Propagation, pages 63–110. CRC Press, 2008. 6
[47] V. A. Dougalis, D. E. Mitsotakis, and J.-C. Saut. On some Boussinesq systems in two space
dimensions: Theory and numerical analysis. Math. Model. Num. Anal., 41(5):254–825, 2007.
6
[48] P. G. Drazin and R. S. Johnson. Solitons: An introduction. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1989. 15, 45
[49] A. Duran, D. Dutykh, and D. Mitsotakis. On the Galilean Invariance of Some Nonlinear
Dispersive Wave Equations. Stud. Appl. Math., 131(4):359–388, nov 2013. 35
[50] D. Dutykh, M. Chhay, and F. Fedele. Geometric numerical schemes for the KdV equation.
Comp. Math. Math. Phys., 53(2):221–236, 2013. 57
[51] D. Dutykh and D. Clamond. Efficient computation of steady solitary gravity waves. Wave
Motion, 51(1):86–99, jan 2014. 45
[52] D. Dutykh, D. Clamond, P. Milewski, and D. Mitsotakis. Finite volume and pseudo-spectral
schemes for the fully nonlinear 1D Serre equations. Eur. J. Appl. Math., 24(05):761–787,
2013. 6, 15, 37, 40
[53] D. Dutykh and F. Dias. Dissipative Boussinesq equations. C. R. Mecanique, 335:559–583,
2007. 41
[54] D. Dutykh and F. Dias. Energy of tsunami waves generated by bottom motion. Proc. R.
Soc. A, 465:725–744, 2009. 10
[55] D. Dutykh and D. Ionescu-Kruse. Travelling wave solutions for some two-component shallow
water models. J. Diff. Eqns., 261(2):1099–1114, jul 2016. 15
[56] D. Dutykh and H. Kalisch. Boussinesq modeling of surface waves due to underwater landslides. Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 20(3):267–285, may 2013. 48, 49
[57] D. Dutykh, T. Katsaounis, and D. Mitsotakis. Finite volume schemes for dispersive wave
propagation and runup. J. Comput. Phys., 230(8):3035–3061, apr 2011. 6, 37
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
62 / 66
[58] D. Dutykh, T. Katsaounis, and D. Mitsotakis. Finite volume methods for unidirectional
dispersive wave models. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 71:717–736, 2013. 6, 37
[59] D. Dutykh, D. Mitsotakis, S. A. Beisel, and N. Y. Shokina. Dispersive waves generated
by an underwater landslide. In E. Vazquez-Cendon, A. Hidalgo, P. Garcia-Navarro, and
L. Cea, editors, Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Equations: Theory and Applications,
pages 245–250. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Leiden, 2013. 48, 49
[60] F. Enet and S. T. Grilli. Experimental study of tsunami generation by three-dimensional
rigid underwater landslides. J. Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 133(6):442–
454, 2007. 48
[61] R. C. Ertekin, W. C. Webster, and J. V. Wehausen. Waves caused by a moving disturbance
in a shallow channel of finite width. J. Fluid Mech., 169:275–292, aug 1986. 16
[62] M. S. Fabien. Spectral Methods for Partial Dierential Equations that Model Shallow Water
Wave Phenomena. Master, University of Washington, 2014. 6
[63] Z. I. Fedotova and E. D. Karepova. Variational principle for approximate models of wave
hydrodynamics. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 11(3):183–204, 1996. 57
[64] Z. I. Fedotova and G. S. Khakimzyanov. Shallow water equations on a movable bottom.
Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 24(1):31–42, 2009. 16, 46
[65] Z. I. Fedotova, G. S. Khakimzyanov, and D. Dutykh. Energy equation for certain approximate models of long-wave hydrodynamics. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling,
29(3):167–178, jan 2014. 48
[66] Z. I. Fedotova and V. Y. Pashkova. Methods of construction and the analysis of difference
schemes for nonlinear dispersive models of wave hydrodynamics. Russ. J. Numer. Anal.
Math. Modelling, 12(2), 1997. 42
[67] J. D. Fenton and M. M. Rienecker. A Fourier method for solving nonlinear water-wave
problems: application to solitary-wave interactions. J. Fluid Mech., 118:411–443, apr 1982.
37, 38, 39
[68] E. D. Fernandez-Nieto, F. Bouchut, D. Bresch, M. J. Castro-Diaz, and A. Mangeney. A new
Savage-Hutter type models for submarine avalanches and generated tsunami. J. Comput.
Phys., 227(16):7720–7754, 2008. 48
[69] G. R. Flierl. Particle motions in large-amplitude wave fields. Geophysical & Astrophysical
Fluid Dynamics, 18(1-2):39–74, aug 1981. 45
[70] S. Glimsdal, G. K. Pedersen, K. Atakan, C. B. Harbitz, H. P. Langtangen, and F. Lovholt.
Propagation of the Dec. 26, 2004, Indian Ocean Tsunami: Effects of Dispersion and Source
Characteristics. Int. J. Fluid Mech. Res., 33(1):15–43, 2006. 31
[71] S. Glimsdal, G. K. Pedersen, C. B. Harbitz, and F. Løvholt. Dispersion of tsunamis: does
it really matter? Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13(6):1507–1526, jun 2013.
32, 49
[72] A. E. Green, N. Laws, and P. M. Naghdi. On the theory of water waves. Proc. R. Soc.
Lond. A, 338:43–55, 1974. 5
[73] S. Grilli, S. Vogelmann, and P. Watts. Development of a 3D numerical wave tank for
modeling tsunami generation by underwater landslides. Engng Anal. Bound. Elem., 26:301–
313, 2002. 48
[74] S. T. Grilli and P. Watts. Tsunami Generation by Submarine Mass Failure. I: Modeling,
Experimental Validation, and Sensitivity Analyses. Journal of Waterway Port Coastal and
Ocean Engineering, 131(6):283, 2005. 48
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
63 / 66
[75] J. Grue, E. N. Pelinovsky, D. Fructus, T. Talipova, and C. Kharif. Formation of undular
bores and solitary waves in the Strait of Malacca caused by the 26 December 2004 Indian
Ocean tsunami. J. Geophys. Res., 113(C5):C05008, may 2008. 31
[76] E. Hairer, S. P. Nørsett, and G. Wanner. Solving ordinary differential equations: Nonstiff
problems. Springer, 2009. 6
[77] E. Hairer and G. Wanner. Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II. Stiff and DifferentialAlgebraic Problems. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol. 14, 1996. 6
[78] J. Hammack, D. Henderson, P. Guyenne, and M. Yi. Solitary wave collisions. In Proc. 23rd
International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2004. 43
[79] F. H. Harlow and J. E. Welch. Numerical Calculation of Time-Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface. Phys. Fluids, 8:2182, 1965. 8
[80] H. Hermes. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Universitext. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 1973. 26
[81] N. J. Higham. Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms. SIAM Philadelphia, 2nd
ed. edition, 2002. 25
[82] J. Horrillo, Z. Kowalik, and Y. Shigihara. Wave Dispersion Study in the Indian OceanTsunami of December 26, 2004. Marine Geodesy, 29(3):149–166, dec 2006. 6
[83] W. Huang. Practical Aspects of Formulation and Solution of Moving Mesh Partial Differential Equations. J. Comp. Phys., 171(2):753–775, aug 2001. 5
[84] W. Huang and R. D. Russell. Adaptive mesh movement - the MMPDE approach and its
applications. J. Comp. Appl. Math., 128(1-2):383–398, mar 2001. 5
[85] A. M. Il’in. Differencing scheme for a differential equation with a small parameter affecting the highest derivative. Mathematical Notes of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR,
6(2):596–602, aug 1969. 5, 16
[86] M. Ioualalen, S. Migeon, and O. Sardoux. Landslide tsunami vulnerability in the Ligurian
Sea: case study of the 1979 October 16 Nice international airport submarine landslide and
of identified geological mass failures. Geophys. J. Int., 181(2):724–740, mar 2010. 48, 49
[87] R. S. Johnson. Camassa-Holm, Korteweg-de Vries and related models for water waves. J.
Fluid Mech., 455:63–82, 2002. 57
[88] A. Kabbaj. Contribution à l’étude du passage des ondes de gravité et de la génération
des ondes internes sur un talus, dans le cadre de la théorie de l’eau peu profonde. Thèse,
Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble, 1985. 41, 44
[89] M. Kazolea and A. I. Delis. A well-balanced shock-capturing hybrid finite volume-finite
difference numerical scheme for extended 1D Boussinesq models. Appl. Numer. Math.,
67:167–186, 2013. 6
[90] G. Khakimzyanov and D. Dutykh. On supraconvergence phenomenon for second order
centered finite differences on non-uniform grids. J. Comp. Appl. Math., 326:1–14, dec 2017.
16, 17
[91] G. S. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, and Z. I. Fedotova. Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part III: Model derivation on a globally spherical geometry. Submitted, pages 1–40,
2017. 56, 57
[92] G. S. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, Z. I. Fedotova, and D. E. Mitsotakis. Dispersive shallow
water wave modelling. Part I: Model derivation on a globally flat space. Submitted, pages
1–40, 2017. 5, 7, 10, 11, 44, 46
[93] G. S. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, and O. Gusev. Dispersive shallow water wave modelling.
Part IV: Numerical simulation on a globally spherical geometry. Submitted, pages 1–40,
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
[94]
[95]
[96]
[97]
[98]
[99]
[100]
[101]
[102]
[103]
[104]
[105]
[106]
[107]
[108]
[109]
[110]
[111]
[112]
[113]
[114]
64 / 66
2017. 57
G. S. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, D. E. Mitsotakis, and N. Y. Shokina. Numerical solution
of conservation laws on moving grids. Submitted, pages 1–28, 2017. 16, 21, 26, 29, 48
J. W. Kim, K. J. Bai, R. C. Ertekin, and W. C. Webster. A derivation of the Green-Naghdi
equations for irrotational flows. J. Eng. Math., 40(1):17–42, 2001. 57
J. W. Kim and R. C. Ertekin. A numerical study of nonlinear wave interaction in regular
and irregular seas: irrotational Green-Naghdi model. Marine Structures, 13(4-5):331–347,
jul 2000. 16
H. O. Kreiss and G. Scherer. Method of lines for hyperbolic equations. SIAM Journal on
Numerical Analysis, 29:640–646, 1992. 6
A. A. Kurkin, S. V. Semin, and Y. A. Stepanyants. Transformation of surface waves over a
bottom step. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 51(2):214–223, mar 2015. 40, 41
Z. Lai, C. Chen, G. W. Cowles, and R. C. Beardsley. A nonhydrostatic version of FVCOM:
1. Validation experiments. J. Geophys. Res., 115(C11):C11010, nov 2010. 41
O. Le Métayer, S. Gavrilyuk, and S. Hank. A numerical scheme for the Green-Naghdi
model. J. Comp. Phys., 229(6):2034–2045, 2010. 6
D. Y. Le Roux. Spurious inertial oscillations in shallow-water models. J. Comp. Phys.,
231(24):7959–7987, oct 2012. 32
E. K. Lindstrøm, G. K. Pedersen, A. Jensen, and S. Glimsdal. Experiments on slide generated waves in a 1:500 scale fjord model. Coastal Engineering, 92:12–23, oct 2014. 48
P. L.-F. Liu, T.-R. Wu, F. Raichlen, C. E. Synolakis, and J. C. Borrero. Runup and rundown
generated by three-dimensional sliding masses. J. Fluid Mech., 536(1):107–144, jul 2005. 48
F. Løvholt, G. Pedersen, and G. Gisler. Oceanic propagation of a potential tsunami from
the La Palma Island. J. Geophys. Res., 113(C9):C09026, sep 2008. 49
P. Lynett and P. L. F. Liu. A numerical study of submarine-landslide-generated waves and
run-up. Proc. R. Soc. A, 458(2028):2885–2910, dec 2002. 48
O. S. Madsen and C. C. Mei. The transformation of a solitary wave over an uneven bottom.
J. Fluid Mech., 39(04):781–791, dec 1969. 41
P. A. Madsen, H. B. Bingham, and H. Liu. A new Boussinesq method for fully nonlinear
waves from shallow to deep water. J. Fluid Mech., 462:1–30, 2002. 37
P. A. Madsen, R. Murray, and O. R. Sorensen. A new form of the Boussinesq equations
with improved linear dispersion characteristics. Coastal Engineering, 15:371–388, 1991. 6
P. A. Madsen and O. R. Sorensen. A new form of the Boussinesq equations with improved
linear dispersion characteristics. Part 2. A slowly-varying bathymetry. Coastal Engineering,
18:183–204, 1992. 6
S. V. Manoylin. Some experimental and theoretical methods of estimation of tsunami wave
action on hydro-technical structures and seaports. Technical report, Siberian Branch of
Computing Center, Krasnoyarsk, 1989. 38, 39
T. Maxworthy. Experiments on collisions between solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech, 76:177–185,
1976. 37, 38, 39
J. W. Miles and R. Salmon. Weakly dispersive nonlinear gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech.,
157:519–531, 1985. 57
S. M. Mirie and C. H. Su. Collision between two solitary waves. Part 2. A numerical study.
J. Fluid Mech., 115:475–492, 1982. 37
D. Mitsotakis, B. Ilan, and D. Dutykh. On the Galerkin/Finite-Element Method for the
Serre Equations. J. Sci. Comput., 61(1):166–195, feb 2014. 6, 15
Dispersive shallow water wave modelling. Part II
65 / 66
[115] E. Pelinovsky, B. H. Choi, T. Talipova, S. B. Wood, and D. C. Kim. Solitary wave transformation on the underwater step: Asymptotic theory and numerical experiments. Applied
Mathematics and Computation, 217(4):1704–1718, oct 2010. 41, 44, 47
[116] D. H. Peregrine. Calculations of the development of an undular bore. J. Fluid Mech.,
25(02):321–330, mar 1966. 6, 31, 33, 34
[117] D. H. Peregrine. Long waves on a beach. J. Fluid Mech., 27:815–827, 1967. 5, 16
[118] D. H. Peregrine. Water-Wave Impact on Walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 35:23–43, 2003.
36
[119] B. Ranguelov, S. Tinti, G. Pagnoni, R. Tonini, F. Zaniboni, and A. Armigliato. The
nonseismic tsunami observed in the Bulgarian Black Sea on 7 May 2007: Was it due to a
submarine landslide? Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(18):L18613, sep 2008. 48
[120] S. C. Reddy and L. N. Trefethen. Stability of the method of lines. Numerische Mathematik,
62(1):235–267, 1992. 6
[121] G. Sadaka. Solution of 2D Boussinesq systems with FreeFem++: the flat bottom case.
Journal of Numerical Mathematics, 20(3-4):303–324, jan 2012. 5
[122] A. A. Samarskii. The Theory of Difference Schemes. CRC Press, New York, 2001. 23, 26
[123] W. E. Schiesser. Method of lines solution of the Korteweg-de vries equation. Computers
Mathematics with Applications, 28(10-12):147–154, 1994. 6
[124] F. J. Seabra-Santos, D. P. Renouard, and A. M. Temperville. Numerical and Experimental
study of the transformation of a Solitary Wave over a Shelf or Isolated Obstacle. J. Fluid
Mech, 176:117–134, 1987. 41, 42, 43, 45
[125] F. J. Seabra-Santos, A. M. Temperville, and D. P. Renouard. On the weak interaction of
two solitary waves. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids, 8(2):103–115, 1989. 37
[126] F. Serre. Contribution à l’étude des écoulements permanents et variables dans les canaux.
La Houille blanche, 8:830–872, 1953. 5
[127] F. Serre. Contribution to the study of long irrotational waves. La Houille blanche, 3:374–388,
1956. 5
[128] L. F. Shampine. ODE solvers and the method of lines. Numerical Methods for Partial
Differential Equations, 10(6):739–755, 1994. 6
[129] Y. I. Shokin, Y. V. Sergeeva, and G. S. Khakimzyanov. Predictor-corrector scheme for the
solution of shallow water equations. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 21(5):459–479,
jan 2006. 6, 21, 22
[130] G. Söderlind and L. Wang. Adaptive time-stepping and computational stability. J. Comp.
Appl. Math., 185(2):225–243, 2006. 56
[131] O. R. Sørensen, H. A. Schäffer, and L. S. Sørensen. Boussinesq-type modelling using an
unstructured finite element technique. Coastal Engineering, 50(4):181–198, feb 2004. 6
[132] C. H. Su and R. M. Mirie. On head-on collisions between two solitary waves. J. Fluid
Mech., 98:509–525, 1980. 37, 38
[133] D. R. Tappin, P. Watts, and S. T. Grilli. The Papua New Guinea tsunami of 17 July 1998:
anatomy of a catastrophic event. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 8:243–266, 2008. 49
[134] P. D. Thomas and C. K. Lombart. Geometric conservation law and its application to flow
computations on moving grid. AIAA Journal, 17(10):1030–1037, 1979. 5
[135] A. N. Tikhonov and A. A. Samarskii. Homogeneous difference schemes. Zh. vych. mat.,
1(1):5–63, 1961. 16
[136] A. N. Tikhonov and A. A. Samarskii. Homogeneous difference schemes on non-uniform nets.
Zh. vych. mat., 2(5):812–832, 1962. 16
G. Khakimzyanov, D. Dutykh, et al.
66 / 66
[137] S. Tinti, E. Bortolucci, and C. Vannini. A Block-Based Theoretical Model Suited to Gravitational Sliding. Natural Hazards, 16(1):1–28, 1997. 48
[138] J. Touboul and E. Pelinovsky. Bottom pressure distribution under a solitonic wave reflecting
on a vertical wall. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids, 48:13–18, nov 2014. 37
[139] M. Walkley and M. Berzins. A finite element method for the two-dimensional extended
Boussinesq equations. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 39(10):865–885, aug 2002. 6
[140] S. N. Ward. Landslide tsunami. J. Geophysical Res., 106:11201–11215, 2001. 48
[141] P. Watts, S. T. Grilli, J. T. Kirby, G. J. Fryer, and D. R. Tappin. Landslide tsunami case
studies using a Boussinesq model and a fully nonlinear tsunami generation model. Natural
Hazards And Earth System Science, 3(5):391–402, 2003. 48
[142] P. Watts, F. Imamura, and S. T. Grilli. Comparing model simulations of three benchmark
tsunami generation cases. Science of Tsunami Hazards, 18(2):107–123, 2000. 48
[143] G. Wei and J. T. Kirby. Time-Dependent Numerical Code for Extended Boussinesq Equations. J. Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 121(5):251–261, sep 1995. 6
[144] N. N. Zagryadskaya, S. V. Ivanova, L. S. Nudner, and A. I. Shoshin. Action of long waves
on a vertical obstacle. Bulletin of VNIIG, 138:94–101, 1980. 38, 39
[145] V. E. Zakharov. What Is Integrability? Springer Series in Nonlinear Dynamics, 1991. 15
[146] Y. Zhang, A. B. Kennedy, N. Panda, C. Dawson, and J. J. Westerink. Boussinesq-GreenNaghdi rotational water wave theory. Coastal Engineering, 73:13–27, mar 2013. 42
[147] B. B. Zhao, R. C. Ertekin, and W. Y. Duan. A comparative study of diffraction of shallowwater waves by high-level IGN and GN equations. J. Comput. Phys., 283:129–147, feb 2015.
6
[148] M. I. Zheleznyak. Influence of long waves on vertical obstacles. In E. N. Pelinovsky, editor,
Tsunami Climbing a Beach, pages 122–139. Applied Physics Institute Press, Gorky, 1985.
39
[149] M. I. Zheleznyak and E. N. Pelinovsky. Physical and mathematical models of the tsunami
climbing a beach. In E. N. Pelinovsky, editor, Tsunami Climbing a Beach, pages 8–34.
Applied Physics Institute Press, Gorky, 1985. 16
G. Khakimzyanov: Institute of Computational Technologies, Siberian Branch of the
Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
E-mail address: [email protected]
D. Dutykh: LAMA, UMR 5127 CNRS, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Campus Scientifique, F-73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex, France
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: http://www.denys-dutykh.com/
O. Gusev: Institute of Computational Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian
Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
E-mail address: [email protected]
N. Yu. Shokina: Institute of Computational Technologies, Siberian Branch of the
Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nina_Shokina/
| 5cs.CE
|
ADM-CLE APPROACH FOR DETECTING SLOW VARIABLES IN CONTINUOUS TIME
MARKOV CHAINS AND DYNAMIC DATA∗
MIHAI CUCURINGU† ‡
AND
RADEK ERBAN§
Abstract. A method for detecting intrinsic slow variables in high-dimensional stochastic chemical reaction networks is developed
and analyzed. It combines anisotropic diffusion maps (ADM) with approximations based on the chemical Langevin equation (CLE).
The resulting approach, called ADM-CLE, has the potential of being more efficient than the ADM method for a large class of chemical
reaction systems, because it replaces the computationally most expensive step of ADM (running local short bursts of simulations)
by using an approximation based on the CLE. The ADM-CLE approach can be used to estimate the stationary distribution of the
detected slow variable, without any a-priori knowledge of it. If the conditional distribution of the fast variables can be obtained
analytically, then the resulting ADM-CLE approach does not make any use of Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the distributions
of both slow and fast variables.
arXiv:1504.01786v1 [cs.CE] 8 Apr 2015
Key words. diffusion maps, stochastic chemical reaction networks, slow variables, stationary distributions
1. Introduction. The time evolution of a complex chemical reaction network often occurs at different time
scales, and the observer is interested in tracking the evolution of the slowly evolving quantities (i.e., of the so
called slow variables) as opposed to recording each and every single reaction that takes place in the system.
Whenever a separation of scales exists, one has to simulate a large number of reactions in the system in order to
capture the evolution of the slowly evolving variables. With this observation in mind, it becomes crucial to be
able to detect and parametrize the underlying slow manifold corresponding to the slow variables intrinsic to the
system. In the present paper, we introduce an unsupervised method of discovering the underlying hidden slow
variables in chemical reaction networks, and of their stationary distributions, using the anisotropic diffusion map
(ADM) framework [39].
The ADM is a special class of diffusion maps which have gained tremendous popularity in machine learning
and statistical analysis, as a robust nonlinear dimensionality reduction technique, in recent years [36, 2, 10, 6].
Diffusion maps have been successfully used as a manifold learning tool, where it is assumed that the high
dimensional data lies on a lower dimensional manifold, and one tries to capture the underlying geometric structure
of the data, a setup where the traditional linear dimensionality reduction techniques (such as the Principal
Component Analysis) have been shown to fail. In the diffusion maps setup, one constructs or is given a sparse
weighted connected graph (usually in the form of a weighted k-Nearest-Neighbor graph, with each node connected
only to its k nearest or most similar neighbors), and uses it to build the associated combinatorial Laplacian
L̃ = D − W , where W denotes the matrix of weights and D denotes a diagonal matrix with Dii equal to the sum
of all weights of the node i. Next, one considers the generalized eigenvalue problem L̃x = λDx, whose solutions
are related to the solutions of the eigenvalue problem Lx = λx, where L = D−1 W is a row-stochastic matrix
often dubbed as the random walk normalized Laplacian. Whenever the pair (λ, x) is an eigenvalue-eigenvector
solution to Lx = λx, then so is (1 − λ, x) for L̃x = λDx. The (non-symmetric) matrix L can also be interpreted
as a transition probability matrix of a Markov chain with state space given by the nodes of the graph, and entries
Lij denoting the one-step transition probability from node i to j.
In the diffusion map framework, one exploits a property of the top nontrivial eigenvector of the graph
Laplacian of being piecewise constant on subsets of nodes in the domain that correspond to the same state
associated to the underlying slow variable. We make this statement precise in Section 4, and further use the
resulting classification in Section 5 to propose an unsupervised method for computing the stationary distribution
of the hidden slow variable, without using any prior information on its structure. Since the top eigenvectors
of the above Laplacian define the coarsest modes of variation in the data, and have a natural interpretation in
terms of diffusion and random walks, they have been used in a very wide range of applications, including but
∗ Submitted to the journal’s Computational Methods in Science and Engineering section March 23, 2018. The research leading
to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework
Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ ERC grant agreement No. 239870. This publication is based on work supported in part by Award
No KUK-C1-013-04, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).
† Department of Mathematics, UCLA, 520 Portola Plaza, Mathematical Sciences Building 6363, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555.
Email: [email protected]
‡ Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics (PACM), Princeton University, Fine Hall, Washington Road, Princeton,
NJ, 08544-1000 USA. This work was initiated when the author was a Ph.D. student supported by PACM. Mihai Cucuringu also
acknowledges support from AFOSR MURI grant FA9550-10-1-0569, and is grateful to Amit Singer for his support, via Award Number
R01GM090200 from the NIGMS, and Award Number FA9550-09-1-0551 from AFOSR.
§ Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United
Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]; Radek Erban would like to thank the Royal Society for a University Research Fellowship;
Brasenose College, University of Oxford, for a Nicholas Kurti Junior Fellowship; and the Leverhulme Trust for a Philip Leverhulme
Prize. This prize money was used to support research visits of Mihai Cucuringu in Oxford.
1
not limited to partitioning [41, 40], clustering and community detection [34, 45, 33], image segmentation [38],
ranking [47, 17], and data visualization and learning from data [7, 36].
The main application area studied in this paper are stochastic models of chemical reaction networks. They
are written in terms of stochastic simulation algorithms (SSAs) [21, 22] which have been used to model a number
of biological systems, including the phage λ lysis-lysogeny decision circuit [1], circadian rhythms [44], and the
cell cycle [27]. The Gillespie SSA [21] is an exact stochastic method that simulates every chemical reaction,
sampling from the solution of the corresponding chemical master equation (CME). To characterize the behavior
of a chemical system, one needs to simulate a large number of reactions and realizations, which leads to very
computationally intensive algorithms. For suitable classes of chemically reacting systems, one can sometimes
use exact algorithms which are equivalent to the Gillespie SSA, but are less computationally intensive, such as
the Gibson-Bruck SSA [19] and the Optimized Direct Method [5]. However, these methods also stochastically
simulate the occurrence of every chemical reaction, which can be a computationally challenging task for systems
with a very large number of species. One way to tackle this problem is to use parallel stochastic simulations [28].
In this work, we discuss an alternative approach which does not make use of parallel stochastic simulations, but
at the same time, the proposed approach can also benefit from large processing power and parallel computing,
as many steps of our proposed algorithms are highly parallelizable.
An alternative approach to treating the molecular populations as discrete random variables, is to describe
them in terms of their continuously changing concentration, which can be done via the Chemical Langevin
equation (CLE), a stochastic differential equation that links the discrete stochastic simulation algorithm with the
deterministic reaction rate equations [20]. Although such an approach can be less computationally expensive,
it comes with the disadvantage that, for certain chemical systems, it can lead to negative populations [46]. In
addition, note that none of the above approaches takes explicit advantage of the separation of scales if one exists,
a which we will make use of in this paper as detailed in Sections 4 and 5.
It is often the case that a modeller is not interested in every single reaction which takes place in the system,
but only in the slowly evolving quantities. Certain systems possess multiple time scales, meaning that one has to
simulate a large number of reactions to reveal the slow dynamics. Several algorithms for chemical networks with
fast and slow variables have already been developed in the literature. The authors of [25] proposed to simulate
the fast reactions using Langevin dynamics, and the slow reactions using the Gillespie algorithm. This approach
requires both the time scale separation and a sufficiently large system volume; however the latter constraint can be
avoided using probability densities of the fast species conditioned on the slow species, and estimating the effective
propensity functions of the slow species [3, 4, 13, 37, 43]. An alternative approach to simulating the evolution of
the slow variables while avoiding doing so for the fast variables, is to estimate the probability distribution of the
slow variables [18]. The key point in this approach is to use short bursts of appropriately initialized stochastic
simulations to estimate the drift and diffusion coefficients for an approximating Fokker-Planck equation written
in terms of the slow variables [15]. The success of this approach has already been demonstrated in a range of
applications including materials science [24], cell motility [14], and social behavior of insects [42].
Ref. [8] introduces the conditional stochastic simulation algorithm (CSSA) that allows one to sample efficiently from the distribution of the fast variables conditioned on the slow ones [8], and to estimate the coefficients
of the effective stochastic differential equation (SDE) on the fly via a proposed constrained multiscale algorithm
(CMA) algorithm. The CMA can be further modified by estimating the drift and diffusion coefficients in the
form given by the CLE for the slow subsystem, which requires the estimation of effective propensity functions of
slow reactions [9]. The main question we plan to address in our present work builds on and combines two already
existing ideas investigated in [8] and [39], and brings several computational and algorithmic improvements. The
above-mentioned CSSA algorithm explicitly makes use of the knowledge of the slow variables (often unavailable
in many real applications), a drawback we plan to address as explained later in Section 4, where, driven by the
top eigenvector of an appropriately constructed Laplacian, we discover the underlying slow variable. In doing
so, we make use of the ADM framework [39] which modifies the traditional diffusion map approach to take into
account the time-dependence of the data, i.e., the time stamp of each of the data points under consideration. By
integrating local similarities at different scales, the ADM gives a global description of the data set.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we provide a mathematical framework for
multiscale modeling of stochastic chemical reactions networks and detail the two chemical systems via which
we use to illustrate our approach. In Section 3 we introduce the ADM-CLE framework and we highlight its
differences from the approaches which were previously introduced in the literature. In Section 4 we propose a
robust mapping from the observable space to the “dynamically meaningful” inaccessible space, that allows us to
recover the hidden slow variables. In Section 5 we introduce a Markov-based approach for approximating the
steady distribution of the slow variable, and compare our results with another recently proposed approach. We
conclude with a summary and discussion of future work in Section 6.
2
2. Problem formulation. A multi-scale modeling framework for stochastic chemical reaction networks
can be formulated as follows. We consider a well-mixed system of ` chemical species, denoted by X1 , X2 , . . . , X`
that interact through m reaction channels R1 , R2 , . . . , Rm in a reactor of volume V . We denote the state of the
system by X(t) = [X1 (t), X2 , . . . , X` (t)], where Xi (t), i = 1, 2, . . . , ` represents the number of molecules of type
Xi in the system at time t. With a slight abuse of notation, we interchangeably use Xi to denote the type i of
the molecule. In certain scenarios, one may assume that the reactions can be classified as either fast or slow,
depending on the time scale of occurrence [3]. As expected, the fast reactions occur many times on a timescale
for which the slow reactions occur with very small probability. As defined in [3], the fast species denoted by F
are those species whose population gets changed by a fast reaction. Slow species (denoted by S) are not changed
by fast reactions. Considering that slow species are not only species from the set {X1 , X2 , . . . , X` }, but also their
functions which are not changed by fast reactions, the components of the fast and slow species can be used as a
basis for the state space of the system, whose dimension equals the number of linearly independent species.
For each reaction channel Rj , j = 1, 2, . . . , m, there exists a corresponding propensity function αj ≡ αj (x),
such that αj dt denotes the probability that, given X(t) = x, reaction Rj occurs within the infinitesimal time
interval [t, t + dt). We denote by ν the stochiometrix matrix of size m × `, with entry νji denoting the change
in the number of molecules of type Xi caused by one occurrence of reaction channel Rj . The continuous time
discrete in space Markov chain can be further approximated by the CLE for a multivariate continuous Markov
process [20]. Using time step ∆t, the Euler-Maruyama discretization of the CLE is given by
Xi (t + ∆t) = Xi (t) + ∆t
m
X
νji αj (X(t)) +
j=1
m
X
νji
q
√
αj (X(t)) Nj (t) ∆t,
for all i = 1, 2, . . . , `,
(2.1)
j=1
where Xi , with another slight abuse of notation, denotes a real-valued approximation of the number of molecules
of the i-th chemical species, i = 1, 2, . . . , `. Here, Nj (t), j = 1, 2, . . . , m, denote the set of m independent normally
distributed random variables with zero mean and unit variance.
2.1. Illustrative example CS-I. As the first illustrative example, we consider the following simple 2dimensional chemical system, with the two chemical species denoted by X1 and X2 (i.e., ` = 2) which are subject
to four reaction channels Rj , j = 1, 2, 3, 4 (i.e., m = 4), given by
k2
k1
k4
∅ −→
X1 −→
←− X2 −→ ∅.
(2.2)
k3
Throughout the rest of this paper, we shall refer to the chemical system (2.2) as CS-I (i.e. “chemical system I”).
We label by Rj the reaction corresponding to the reaction rate subscript kj , j = 1, 2, 3, 4, and note that each
reaction Rj has associated a propensity function αj (t) given by [21]
α1 (t) = k1 V,
α2 (t) = k2 X1 (t),
α3 (t) = k3 X2 (t),
α4 (t) = k4 X2 (t),
(2.3)
where V denotes the volume of the reactor. We consider the system with the following dimensionless parameters
k1 V = 100,
k2 = k3 = 200
and
k4 = 1.
(2.4)
We plot in Figure 2.1(a) the time evolution of the two different species in system (2.2), together with the slow
variable S = (X1 + X2 )/2, starting from initial conditions X1 (0) = X2 (0) = 100. As the figure shows, the system
variables X1 and X2 are changing very frequently (thus we label them as fast variables), while the newly defined
variable S changes very infrequently and can be considered to be a slow variable.
Following [26], for the chemical system in (2.2) comprised only of monomolecular reactions, it is possible to
compute analytically the stationary distribution of the slow variable S, since the joint probability distribution of
the two variables X1 and X2 is a multivariate Poisson distribution
λ̄n1 1 λ̄n2 2
exp −λ̄1 − λ̄2
n1 ! n2 !
P(X1 = n1 , X2 = n2 ) =
(2.5)
with parameters given by
λ̄1 =
k1 V (k3 + k4 )
= 100.5
k2 k4
3
and
λ̄2 =
k1 V
= 100.
k4
(2.6)
(a)
(b)
Trajectory of X1, X2, and S/3 = (X1 + 2 X2)/3
Trajectory of X1, X2, and (X1 + X2)/2
40
Number of molecules
Number of molecules
120
110
100
90
80
0
X1
X2
X
1
2
(X + 2 X )/3
1
2
30
25
20
15
10
(X1 + X2)/2
0.05
X
35
0.1
0.15
5
0
0.2
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Time t
Time t
Fig. 2.1. (a) Trajectories of the CS-I considered in (2.2) showing the behavior of the slow variable S = (X1 + X2 )/2 in contrast
to the behavior of the fast variables X1 and X2 , where the system propensity functions and parameters are given by (2.3) and (2.4).
(b) Trajectories of the CS-II considered in (2.7), showing the slow behavior of the variable S = X1 + 2X2 in contrast to the fast
behavior of variables X1 and X2 , where the system parameters are given by (2.8).
2.2. Illustrative example CS-II. The second example is taken from Ref. [8]. We shall refer to it as CS-II
from now on. We consider the following system
k1
X2 −→
←− X1 + X2 ,
k2
k3
∅ −→
←− X1 ,
k4
k5
X1 + X1 −→
←− X2 ,
(2.7)
k6
involving two molecular species X1 and X2 , whose reactions R1 , R2 , . . . , R6 have the propensity functions given
by
α1 (t) = k1 X2 (t),
α4 (t) = k4 X1 (t),
α2 (t) = k2 X1 (t)X2 (t)/V,
X1 (t)(X1 (t) − 1)
,
α5 (t) = k5
V
α3 (t) = k3 V,
α6 (t) = k6 X2 (t),
where V denotes the system volume. Figure 2.1(b) shows a simulated trajectory of this chemical system using
the Gillespie algorithm for the following dimensionless parameters [8]
k1 = 32,
k2 = 0.04V,
k3 V = 1475,
k4 = 19.75,
k5 = 10V,
k6 = 4000,
(2.8)
where we use V = 8. Note that in this second example, reactions R5 and R6 are occurring on a much faster
timescale than the other four reactions R1 , R2 , R3 and R4 . A natural choice for the slow variable is S = X1 +2X2 ,
which is invariant with respect to all fast reactions [8], as we illustrate in Figure 2.1(b).
2.3. Main problem. Our end goal in the present paper is to propose an algorithm that efficiently and
accurately estimates the stationary probability density of the hidden slow variable S, without any prior knowledge
of it. The approach we propose builds on the anisotropic diffusion map framework (ADM) to implicitly discover
the mapping from the observable state space to the dynamically meaningful coordinates of the fast and slow
variables, as previously introduced in [39], and on the CLE approximation (2.1).
3. ADM-CLE approach. Let us consider example CS-II, and assume that s = s(x1 , x2 ) = x1 + 2x2
and f = f (x1 , x2 ) = x1 are the slowly and rapidly changing variables, respectively. They together define
a mapping g : (x1 , x2 ) 7→ (s, f ) from the observable state variables x1 and x2 in the accessible space O to
the “dynamically meaningful” (but in more complicated examples inaccessible) slow variable s and the fast
accessible variable f , both in space H. In other words, g maps (x1 , x2 ) 7→ (x1 + 2x2 , x1 ), and conversely its
inverse h := g −1 : (s, f ) 7→ (f, s−f
2 ).
The approach introduced in [39] exploits the local point clouds generated by many local bursts of simulations
at each point (x1 , x2 ) in the observable space O. Such observable local point clouds are the image under h of
similar local point clouds in the inaccessible space H (at corresponding coordinates (s, f ) such that h(s, f ) =
(x1 , x2 )), which, due to the separation of scales between the fast and slow variables f and s, have the appearance
of thin elongated ellipses. It is precisely this separation of scales that we leverage into building a sparse anisotropic
graph Laplacian L in the observable space, and use it as an approximation of the isotropic graph Laplacian in
the inaccessible space H. As we shall see, the top nontrivial eigenvector of L will robustly indicate all pairs of
original states (x1 , x2 ) that correspond to the same slow variable S = s (where s = x1 + 2x2 for CS-II). In other
words, we discover on the fly the structure of the slow variable S, and further integrate this information into a
4
Markov-based method for estimating its stationary distribution P(S = s), while also computing along the way an
analytical expression for the conditional distribution of the fast variable given the slow variable P(F = f |S = s).
Singer et al. [39] run many local bursts of simulations for a short time step δt starting at (x1 , x2 ). Such
trajectories end up at random locations forming a cloud of points in the observable plane O, with a bivariate
normal distribution with 2 × 2 covariance matrix Σ. The shape of the resulting point cloud is an ellipse, whose
axes reflect the dynamics of the data points. In other words, when there is a separation of scales, the ellipses are
thin and elongated, with the ratio between the axis of the ellipse given by the ratio
τ=
b1
λ
b2
λ
(3.1)
b1 points in the direction of the fast dynamics
of the two eigenvalues of Σ. The first eigenvector corresponding to λ
on the line x1 + 2x2 = s, while the second one points in the direction of the slow dynamics. In particular,
τ is a small parameter, i.e. 0 < τ 1. In general, we wish to piece together locally defined components
into a globally consistent framework, a nontrivial task when the underlying unobservable slow variables (or the
propensity functions of the system) are complicated nonlinear functions of the observable variables in O.
The construction of the ADM framework in [39] relates the anisotropic graph Laplacian in the observable
space O with the isotropic graph Laplacian in the inaccessible space H. In that setup, each of the N data
points x(i) , i = 1, 2, . . . , N, lives in an `-dimensional data space. For both CS-I and CS-II, the data is twodimensional, thus ` = 2. For the former system, we consider each lattice point in the domain [50, 150] × [50, 150],
hence there are N = 1012 = 10, 201 states, while for the latter one we consider the domain [1, 110] × [1, 110],
i.e. N = 1102 = 12, 100. Throughout the paper, we will often refer to the N data points x(i) = (x1 , x2 )(i) ,
i = 1, 2, . . . , N, as O-states of the chemical system. The ADM [39] then generates ensembles of short simulation
bursts at each of the N points in the data set, computes the averaged position after statistically averaging over
the many simulated trajectories, and obtain an estimate of the local 2 × 2 covariance matrix Σ(i) . For each data
point x(i) , the inverse of Σ(i) is computed and symmetric Σ-dependent squared distance between pairs of data
points in the two-dimensional observable space R2 (given by (3.3) below) is defined. The ADM framework then
uses this dynamic distance measure to approximate the Laplacian on the underlying hidden slow manifold. We
provide further details on the anisotropic diffusion maps framework in Section 3.2. We now highlight the first
difference between the approach taken in this paper and in [39].
3.1. Replacing short simulation bursts by the CLE approximation. The local bursts of simulations
initiated at each data point in order to estimate the local covariances may be computationally expensive to
estimate. In this paper, we bypass these short bursts of simulations by using an approximation given by the CLE
(2.1), which allows for a theoretical derivation of the local 2 × 2 covariance matrices. Using (2.1), we obtain
Cov(Xi (t + ∆t), Xk (t + ∆t)) = E[Xi (t + ∆t)Xk (t + ∆t)] − E[Xi (t + ∆t)]E[Xk (t + ∆t)]
m
X
= ∆t
νji νjk αj (X).
(3.2)
j=1
Computing the eigen-decomposition of a local covariance matrix is analogous to performing the Principal Component Analysis on the local cloud of points, generated by the short simulations bursts. The advantage of (3.2)
over the computational approach used in [39] is that Σ(i) can be computed at each data point without running
(computationally intensive) short bursts of simulations. The error of the CLE approximation depends on the
values of coordinates of the data point x(i) , i.e. on the system volume V [23, 12]. In the case of CS-I or CS-II, the
most probable states contain about one hundred molecules of each chemical species and the CLE approximation
(3.2) is well justified.
3.2. Anisotropic diffusion kernels. The next task is the integration of all local principal components
into a global framework, with the purpose of identifying the hidden slow variable. We estimate the distance
(and hence the similarity measure) between the slow variables in the underlying inaccessible manifold using
the anisotropic graph Laplacian [39]. We derive a symmetrized second order approximation of the (unknown)
distances in the inaccessible space H, based on the Jacobian of the unknown mapping from the inaccessible to
the observable space. The Σ-dependent distance between two O-states is given by
T
1
−1
(i)
(j)
(x1 , x2 )(i) − (x1 , x2 )(j) Σ−1
+
Σ
(x
,
x
)
−
(x
,
x
)
,
d2Σ (x1 , x2 )(i) , (x1 , x2 )(j) =
1
2
1
2
(i)
(j)
(x1 ,x2 )
(x1 ,x2 )
2
(3.3)
5
and represents a second order approximation of the Euclidean distance in the inaccessible (s, τ f )-space
d2Σ [(x1 , x2 )(i) , (x1 , x2 )(j) ] ≈ (s(i) − s(j) )2 + τ 2 (f (i) − f (j) )2 ≈ (s(i) − s(j) )2 ,
(3.4)
where the last approximation is due to the fact that τ is a small parameter, see (3.1). Note that it is also
possible to extend (3.4) to higher dimensions, as long as there exists a separation of scales between the set of slow
variables and the set of fast variables [39]. Using approximation (3.3)–(3.4) of the distance between states of the
slow variable, we next construct (an approximation of) the Laplacian on the underlying hidden slow manifold,
using the Gaussian kernel as a similarity measure between the slow variable states. We build an N × N similarity
matrix W with entries
2
−(s(i) − s(j) )2
−dΣ [(x1 , x2 )(i) , (x1 , x2 )(j) ]
≈
exp
,
i, j = 1, 2, . . . , N,
(3.5)
Wij = exp
ε2
ε2
where the single smoothing parameter ε (the kernel scale) has a two-fold interpretation. On one hand, ε denotes
the squared radius of the neighborhood
√ used to infer local geometric information, in particular Wij is O(1) when
s(i) and s(j) are in a ball of radius
ε, thus close on the underlying slow manifold, but it is exponentially small
√
for states that are more than ε apart. On the other hand, ε represents the discrete time step at which the
underlying random walker jumps from one point to another. We refer the reader to [31] for a detailed survey
of random walks on graphs, and their applications. We normalize W using the diagonal matrix D to define the
row-stochastic matrix L by
Dii =
N
X
L = D−1 W.
Wij ,
(3.6)
j=1
Since L is a row-stochastic matrix, it has eigenvalue λ0 = 1 with trivial eigenvector Φ0 = (1, 1, . . . , 1)T . The
remaining eigenvalues can be ordered as
1 = λ0 ≥ λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ . . . ≥ λN −1 .
We denote by Φi the corresponding eigenvectors, i.e. LΦi = λi Φi . The top d nontrivial eigenvectors of the
random-walk anisotropic Laplacian L describe the geometry of the underlying d-dimensional manifold [16], i.e.
the i-th data point x(i) is represented by the following diffusion map
(Φ1 (i), Φ2 (i), . . . , Φd (i)),
i = 1, 2, . . . , N,
(3.7)
where Φj (i) denotes the i-th component of the eigenvector Φj . However, note that some of the considered
eigenvectors can be higher harmonics of the same principal direction along the manifold, thus in practice one
computes the correlation between the computed eigenvectors before selecting the above d eigenvectors chosen to
parametrize the underlying manifold. For the two chemical systems considered in this paper, we show in the
remainder of this section how the top (i.e., d = 1) non-trivial eigenvector of L can be used to successfully recover
the underlying slow variable.
Using the stochasticity of L, we can interpret it as a random walk matrix on the weighted graph G = (V, E),
where the set of nodes corresponds to the original observable states (x1 , x2 )(i) , i = 1, 2, . . . , N (and implicitly to
states s(i) of the slow variable), and there is an edge between nodes i and j if and only if Wij > 0. The associated
combinatorial Laplacian is given by L̃ = D − W . Whenever the pair (λi , Φi ) is an eigenvalue-eigenvector solution
to LΦi = λi Φi , then so is (1 − λi , Φi ) for the generalized eigenvalue problem L̃Φi = λi DΦi . We plot in Figures
3.1(a) and 3.2(a) the spectrum of the combinatorial Laplacian L̃ = D − W , for the chemical systems CS-I and
CS-II. In Figures 3.1(b) and 3.2(b) we color the states of the network with the top non-trivial eigenvector Φ1 .
Before considering the top eigenvector of L for determining the underlying slow variable and estimating its
stationary distribution, we propose to use a sparse graph Laplacian which differs from the ADM method in [39],
where the Laplacian matrix is associated to a complete weighted graph. However, using a complete graph leads
to computing the Σ-dependent squared distance in equation (3.3) for any pair of nodes, thus an O(N 2 ) number
of computations is used. In light of the approximation (3.4), a pair of points which are far away in the observable
space (i.e., for which d2Σ ((x1 , x2 )(i) , (x1 , x2 )(j) ) is large) denotes a pair of corresponding states of the slow variable
which are also far away in the inaccessible space. Thus we do not have to do such computations, because points
far away in the unobservable space will have an exponentially small similarity Wij close to 0. The fact that the
shape of the local point cloud is an ellipse provides some insight in this direction. Thus we will build a sparse
graph of pairwise measurements and no longer compute the Σ-dependent distance between all points of the data
6
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Φ1
Weighted degree
150
Histogram of the weighted degrees of nodes in G
150
Top 500 eigenvalues
550
0.015
500
0.01
450
200
0.8
400
0.005
350
−0.005
0.4
x2
0
100
count
1−λ
x2
0.6
150
300
100
250
100
200
−0.01
0.2
150
50
−0.015
100
50
0
100
200
300
400
rank largest eigenvalue
−0.02
50
50
500
100
x1
0
150
100
200
300
400
weighted degree
50
50
500
100
x1
150
Fig. 3.1. Illustrative Example CS-I. (a) The top 500 eigenvalues of the associated combinatorial Laplacian, i.e. (1 − λi ) for
i = 1, 2, . . . , 500. (b) The coloring of the nodes of G (states of the observable space) according to their corresponding entry in the
top eigenvector Φ1 of L given by (3.6). (c) The weighted degree distribution of the ground state graph G. (d) A scatterplot of the
states of the system, colored by their weighted degree.
(b)
(a)
(c)
(d)
Weighted degree
Φ
1
800
Top 500 eigenvalues
Histogram of the weighted degrees of nodes in G
0.015
100
600
100
700
0.01
0.8
80
500
80
400
60
600
500
60
count
1−λ
x2
0.6
0
40
0.4
x2
0.005
300
400
40
300
−0.005
200
20
0.2
0
100
200
300
400
rank largest eigenvalue
500
−0.01
20
40
60
80
0
100
x1
200
20
100
100
200
400
600
weighted degree
800
20
40
60
80
100
x1
Fig. 3.2. Illustrative Example CS-II. (a) The top 500 eigenvalues of the associated combinatorial Laplacian, i.e. (1 − λi ) for
i = 1, 2, . . . , 500. (b) The coloring of the nodes of G (states of the observable space) according to their corresponding entry in the
top eigenvector Φ1 of L given by (3.6). (c) The weighted degree distribution of the ground state graph G. (d) A scatterplot of the
states of the system, colored by their weighted degree.
set, but only between a very small subset of the points. The spectrum of the covariance matrix Σi , in particular
the ratio τ of its two eigenvalues given by (3.1), guides us in building locally at each point, a sparse ellipsoid-like
neighborhood graph.
For each observable state (x1 , x2 )(i) , we build a local adjacency graph, denoted by Gi , in the shape of an
ellipse pointing in the direction of the fast dynamics, and whose small axis points in the direction of the slow
dynamics. Figure 3.3 shows an example of such a local 1-hop neighborhood graph Gi , where the central node
(x1 , x2 )(i) is connected to all points contained within the boundaries of an appropriately scaled ellipse centered
at (x1 , x2 )(i) . Finally, we define the sparse graph G of size N × N associated to the entire network as the union of
SN
all locally defined ellipsoid-like neighborhood graphs G = i=1 Gi . Note that the union graph G is still a simple
graph, with no self edges and no multiple edges connecting the same pair of nodes. We compute the distance
dΣ by (3.3) (and thus the similarity Wij ) between a pair of nodes (x1 , x2 )(i) and (x1 , x2 )(j) if and only if the
corresponding edge (i, j) exists in G.
We plot in Figures 3.1(c) and 3.2(c) the histogram of the weighted degrees of the nodes in the weighted
graph W defined in (3.5), while Figures 3.1(d) and 3.2(d) show a scatterplot of the states of the system, where
each state i is colored by its weighted degree, i.e., the sum of all its outgoing weighted edges Wij , j = 1, 2, . . . , n.
Throughout the computational examples in this paper, the smoothing parameter ε which appears in (3.5) was
set to ε = 0.1. In contrast to the approach in [39] which computes all O(N 2 ) pairwise similarities, the sparsity
of G (and thus of the associated graph Laplacian L) in our approach only requires the computation of a much
smaller number of distances, as low as linear, depending on the discretization of the domain, and makes it
computationally feasible to solve problems with thousands or even tens of thousands of nodes.
4. A robust mapping from the observable space O to the “dynamically meaningful” inaccessible
space H. As a first step towards partitioning the nodes of the original graph G and detecting the associated
slow variable, we sort the entries of the top eigenvector Φ1 , which we then denote by Φ̄1 with Φ̄1 (1) ≥ Φ̄1 (2) ≥
. . . ≥ Φ̄1 (N ). This sorting process defines permutation σ of the original index set i = 1, 2, . . . , N so that
Φ̄1 (σ(i)) = Φ1 (i). We consider the increments between two consecutive (sorted) values
δi = Φ̄1 (i) − Φ̄1 (i + 1),
i = 1, 2, . . . , N − 1.
7
(4.1)
125
120
115
110
105
100
80
85
90
95
100
105
Fig. 3.3. The local neighborhood graph Gi at a given node (x1 , x2 )(i) ; the shape is an ellipsoid whose axis ratio is given by the
ratio of the eigenvalues τ of the local covariance matrix d2Σ ((x1 , x2 )(i) , (x1 , x2 )(j) ), i.e. by (3.1). The corresponding eigenvectors
are used to calculate the orientation of the ellipse.
(a)
(b)
x 10
0.01
4
3
2
15
eigenvector value
Top eigenvector
5
Jump size
20
0.015
6
0.005
0
−0.005
50
100
150
200
Eigenvector entry
250
300
10
5
−0.01
−0.015
1
zoom−in
−4
x 10
n=10201; Spearman Correlation=0.99998
i
7
0
(c)
Top largest jumps δ
−8
−0.02
50
0
100
True slow variable
150
5000
5200
5400
5600
5800
6000
Index
Fig. 4.1. Illustrative example CS-I. (a) Jump sizes (4.1) of the sorted eigenvector Φ1 of the sparse anisotropic graph Laplacian
L. (b) The correlation of Φ1 with the ground truth slow variable s = (x1 + x2 )/2. (c) Zoom-in on the sorted top eigenvector Φ̄1
(the colors denote the corresponding slow variable) showing that Φ̄1 is almost piece-wise constant on the bins that correspond to
distinct slow variable states. The kernel scale is set to ε = 0.1.
Next, we sort the vector of such increments, denote its entries by δ̄1 ≥ δ̄2 ≥ . . . δ̄N −1 , and show in Figure
4.1(a) (resp. Figure 4.2(a)) the top 300 (resp. top 420) largest such increments δ̄i for illustrative example
CS-I (resp. CS-II). Note that this already give us an idea about the number of distinct slow states in the
system, a set which we denote by S. Ideally, the difference Φ1 (i) − Φ1 (j) in the entries of the top eigenvector
corresponding to two observable states (x1 , x2 )(i) and (x1 , x2 )(j) that belong to the same slow variable s (i.e.,
(i)
(j)
(j)
(i)
x1 + 2x2 = x1 + 2x2 = s for illustrative example CS-II) should be zero or close to zero, in which case
we expect that only approximately |S| of the N − 1 increments δi are significantly larger than zero, while the
remaining majority are zero or close to zero.
In Figures 4.1(b) and 4.2(b) we highlight the correlation between the entries of the top non-trivial eigenvector
Φ1 and the corresponding slow variable S. In Figures 4.1(c) and 4.2(c), we zoom on a subset of states to make the
point that the eigenvector Φ1 is almost constant on the O-states that correspond to the same value of the slow
variable. The plots in Figures 3.1(b) and 3.2(b) show a coloring of the networks generated by the two chemical
systems CS-I and CS-II, based on the first nontrivial eigenvector of the associated sparse Laplacian L. Note that
the eigenvector looks almost piecewise constant along the lines that point to the evolution of the fast variable,
for a given value of the slow variable (S = (X1 + X2 )/2 for CS-I and S = X1 + 2X2 for CS-II), yet nowhere
along the way we have input this information into the method. In the next step we use this top eigenvector
to identify all nodes of the graph (original states of the chemical system) that correspond to the same value of
the underlying slow variable. In other words, all nodes whose corresponding eigenvector entries are between an
appropriately chosen interval (that we shall refer to a bin) will be labeled as belonging to the same slow variable
S. In other words, we seek a partition of the observable states in O, i.e., of the nodes of G, such that all original
states (x1 , x2 )(i) with the same value of the corresponding slow variable s((x1 , x2 )(i) ) end up in the same bin.
8
(a)
(b)
1.2
(c)
Top largest jumps δ
n=12100; Spearman Correlation=0.99999
i
−8
x 10
zoom−in
−3
x 10
−0.5
0.01
1
Jump size
0.6
0.4
0
−0.005
−1.5
−2
−2.5
−0.01
0.2
0
eigenvector value
Top eigenvector
−1
0.8
0.005
−3
−0.015
50
100
150 200 250 300
Eigenvector entry
350
50
100
True slow variable
400
150
5000
5200
5400
5600
5800
6000
Index
Fig. 4.2. Illustrative example CS-II. (a) Jump sizes (4.1) of the sorted eigenvector Φ1 of the sparse anisotropic graph Laplacian
L. (b) The correlation of Φ1 with the ground truth slow variable s = x1 + 2x2 . (c) Zoom-in on the sorted top eigenvector Φ̄1 (the
colors denote the corresponding slow variable) showing that Φ̄1 is almost piece-wise constant on the bins that correspond to distinct
slow variable states. The kernel scale is set to ε = 0.1.
Our goal is to find a partition P = {P1 , P2 , . . . , Pk } of O such that
Pj = {(x1 , x2 )(i) ∈ O | s(x1 , x2 ) = qj }
and
k
[
Pj = O,
(4.2)
j=1
where k denotes the number of distinct values qj , j = 1, 2, . . . , k, of the slow variable S. As an example, in the
case of CS-I given by (2.2), the partition Pj = {(1, 99), (2, 98), . . . , (99, 1)} corresponds to all nodes in the graph
for which the value of the associated slow variable is constant qj = 50. The key observation we exploit here is
that the top eigenvector of the Laplacian matrix is almost piecewise constant on the bins that partition O, since
the nodes of G that correspond to the same value of the slow variable have a very high pairwise similarity, with
Wij very close to 1.
One may also interpret the above problem as a clustering problem, where the similarity between pairs
of points is given by (3.5), and is such that nodes that belong to the same bin have a much higher similarity
compared to nodes that belong to two different bins, an effect due to the strong separation of scales. In the case of
illustrative example CS-I, the clusters correspond to lines in the two-dimensional plane such that (x1 + x2 )/2 = c,
for a constant c. We point out the interested reader to the work of [32], where the top eigenvectors of the
random walk Laplacian are used for clustering. While in practice one uses the top several eigenvectors as the
reduced eigenspace where clustering is subsequently performed, in our case the top eigenvector alone suffices to
capture the many different clusters (i.e., bins), a fact we attribute to the strong separation of scales exhibited
by the illustrative chemical systems CS-I and CS-II. If several eigenvectors were considered then one could use a
clustering algorithm, such as k-means or spectral clustering [38, 45], to obtain the partitioning (4.2). However,
a simpler method has been successfully used for the 1-dimensional eigenspace in both examples we considered.
It is described as follows. Recall the sorted vector of increments δ̄1 ≥ δ̄2 ≥ . . . ≥ δ̄N −1 defined in equation (4.1),
and consider the set of the k − 1 largest such increments {δ̄1 , δ̄2 , . . . , δ̄k−1 } where δ̄1 ≥ δ̄2 ≥ . . . ≥ δ̄k−1 . Next,
from the sorted eigenvector Φ̄1 we extract the position of the entries whose associated increment (with respect
to its right-next neighbor index) belongs to {δ̄1 , δ̄2 , . . . , δ̄k−1 }. In others words, we compute
bt =
arg
Φ̄1 (i) − Φ̄1 (i + 1) = δ̄t ,
where t = 1, 2, . . . , k − 1,
(4.3)
i=1,2,...,N −1
and b0 = 0 and bk = N. Finally, we compute an estimated partition P̂ of O by P̂q = {i ∈ O | σ(i) ∈ (bq−1 , bq ]},
where q = 1, 2, . . . , k, and σ is the permutation of the original index set i = 1, 2, . . . , N, given in the definition of
Φ̄1 , i.e. Φ̄1 (σ(i)) = Φ1 (i).
To illustrate the correctness of our proposed technique, we compute the Jaccard index between each proposed
partition set P̂j , j = 1, 2, . . . , k and each ground truth partition set Pi , i = 1, 2, . . . , |S|:
Jij =
|Pi ∩ P̂j |
|Pi ∪ P̂j |
,
where
i = 1, 2, . . . , |S|,
j = 1, 2, . . . , k,
(4.4)
and show a heatmap of this matrix in Figure 4.3(b). Since we are interested not only in the partition, but also in
recovering the ordering of the slow variable, we show in Figure 4.3(c) the correlation between the ground truth
ordering of the slow variable and our recovered ordering. Note that we can only recover the ordering up to a
9
(c)
Jaccard index heatmap
1
Our recovered 201 slow variables
Number of original states
100
80
60
40
20
0
50
100
Slow variable
150
0.8
50
0.6
100
0.4
150
0.2
200
200
50
100
150
Ground truth 201 slow variables
0
200
(d)
Max matching in the Jaccard index matrix
Spearman correlation = 1
200
1
Jaccard Similarity Index
(b)
Cardinality eig slow var. |S | = 201, Θ = 200
Ground truth label of matched slow variables
(a)
150
100
50
50
100
150
Order of our slow variables (1:201)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
200
0
50
100
150
200
Our recovered slow variables (1:201)
Fig. 4.3. Illustrative example CS-I. (a) The eigenvector-based slow variable cardinality. The Theta score Θ is the smoothness
measure of the bin cardinalities, defined in (4.5). The algorithm perfectly recovers the ground truth partition. (b) The heatmap of
the pairwise Jaccard similarity matrix given by (4.4). (c) The correlation between the ordering of the ground truth slow variable and
the eigenvector recovered slow variable. (d) The Jaccard index of the pairwise matched bins (from the maximum matching).
(b)
(a)
(c)
Cardinality true slow var. |S | = 328, Θ = 108
Cardinality eig slow var. |S | = 328, Θ = 7206
40
30
20
10
0
50
100
150
200
Slow variable
250
300
50
Number of original states
50
Number of original states
Number of original states
50
Cardinality eig slow var. |S | = 328, Θ = 7206
40
30
20
10
0
50
100
150
200
Slow variable
250
300
40
30
20
10
0
130
140
150
160
Slow variable (zoom−in)
170
Fig. 4.4. Illustrative example CS-II. (a) The ground truth slow variable cardinality. (b) The eigenvector-based slow variable
cardinality. Θ captures the smoothness of the bin cardinalities, as introduced in (4.5). (c) Plot of the cardinalities of a subset of
bins, showing the erroneous bin assignments in the eigenvector-based partition. This is a zoomed-in version of panel (b).
global sign, since −Ψ1 is also an eigenvector of L. Finally, we compute the maximum weight matching (using, for
example, the Hungarian method [29]) in the bipartite graph with node set P ∪ P̂ and edges across the two sets
given by matrix J in (4.4). In Figure 4.3(d) we plot the Jaccard index of the matched partitions. For the first
chemical system CS-I, note that the algorithm perfectly recovers the ground truth partition. In Figure 4.4 we
present the outcome of the binning algorithm for the illustrative example CS-II, which is no longer satisfactorily
by itself and requires further improvement. Though the bin cardinalities in the initial solution visually resemble
the ground truth, there are numerous mistakes being made. To illustrate this, for a given partition P, we compute
the following measure of continuity of the recovered bin cardinalities
ΘP = Θ(P1 , . . . , PS ) =
S−1
X
(|Pi | − |Pi+1 |)2 .
(4.5)
i=1
In other words, ΘP captures the squared difference in the cardinalities of two consecutive bins. For the chemical
system CS-II, the ground truth yields a score Θ = 108, while for the eigenvector-recovered solution Θ = 7206,
thus indicating already that numerous misclassifications are being made, without even computing the Jaccard
similarity matrix (4.4) between the two partitions. To this end, we introduce in the next subsection a heuristic
denoising technique followed by a truncation of the domain, which altogether lead to a better partitioning of O
into groups of states that correspond to the same slow variable.
4.1. A bin denoising scheme. While the eigenvector-based partition procedure detailed above yields
accurate results for the CS-I in (2.2), this procedure alone is not sufficient for obtaining a satisfactory partition
for the more complex CS-II considered in (2.7), as illustrated by the high corresponding Θ-score (Θ = 7206)
shown in Figure 4.4(b). In Figure 4.4(c) we zoom into some of the recovered bins, showing that the eigenvectorbased reconstruction splits some of the inner bins, which explains the high associated Θ-score. In other words,
states/bins which in the ground truth solution correspond to the same values of the slow state variable, are
divided into two adjacent bins, and mistaken for two distinct states of the slow variable.
To solve this issue, we propose a bin-denoising heuristic that robustly assigns data points to their respective
bins. In hindsight, the continuity of the eigenfunctions of the Laplacian should be reflected in the continuity
of the histogram of state counts in bins corresponding to adjacent intervals. We detail in Algorithm 1 an
10
Algorithm 1 Bin-merging algorithm:
1: Initialize FLAG = TRUE
2: while FLAG is TRUE do
3:
Compute αi := Θ P1 , . . . , Pi ∪ Pi+1 , . . . P|S| ,
4:
if
min
αi < Θ(P1 , . . . , P|S| ) then
∀i = 1, 2, . . . |S| − 1 using definition (4.5)
i=1,2,...,|S|−1
q=
5:
argmin
αi
i=1,2,...,|S|−1
P := P1 , . . . , Pq ∪ Pq+1 , . . . P|S|
|S| = |S| − 1
else
FLAG = FALSE
end if
end while
(b)
(c)
Up dated cardinality slow var. |S | = 314, Θ = 103
Jaccard index heatmap
1
Our recovered 314 slow variables
Number of original states
50
40
30
20
10
0
50
0.8
100
0.6
150
0.4
200
250
0.2
300
50
100
150
200
250
300
Slow variable (after truncation and denoising)
50
100 150 200 250
Ground truth 314 slow variables
300
0
(d)
Max matching in the Jaccard index matrix
Spearman correlation = 1
300
1
250
Jaccard Similarity Index
(a)
Ground truth label of matched slow variables
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
200
150
100
50
50
100
150
200
250
Order of our slow variables (1:314)
300
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
50
100 150 200 250 300
Our recovered slow variables (1:314)
Fig. 4.5. Illustrative example CS-II. (a) The eigenvector-based slow variable cardinality after truncating and bin denoising.
The Theta score Θ is the smoothness measure of the bin cardinalities, defined in (4.5). (b) The heatmap of the pairwise Jaccard
similarity matrix given by (4.4). (c) The correlation between the ordering of the ground truth slow variable and the eigenvector
recovered slow variable. (d) The Jaccard index of the pairwise matched bins (from the maximum matching).
iterative heuristic procedure which, at each step, merges two adjacent bins such that the resulting Θ-score is
minimized across all possible pairs of adjacent bins that can be merged. We show in Figure 4.5(a) the resulting
bin cardinalities after the bin-merging heuristic and after truncating at the boundary of the slow variable. Note
that the new denoised partition yields Θ = 103, and the number of bins (states of the slow variable) decreases
from |S| = 328 to |S| = 314. Furthermore, in Figure 4.5(b) we compute the Jaccard similarity matrix between
the ground truth and the newly obtained partition, showing in Figure 4.5(d) that we almost perfectly recover
the structure of the ground truth bins.
5. A Markov approach for computing the steady distribution of the slow variable. In this section,
we focus on the final step of the ADM-CLE approach, of estimating the stationary distribution of the slow variable,
without any prior knowledge of what the slow variable actually is. One of the ingredients needed along the way
is an estimation of the conditional distribution P(F |S = s) of the fast variable F given a value s of the slow
variable S, which we compute via two approaches. As the first approach, we consider the Conditional Stochastic
Simulation Algorithm (CSSA) [8] which is given in Algorithm 2. It samples from the distribution of the fast
variable conditioned on the slow variable. The second approach is entirely analytic and free of any stochastic
simulations, and amounts to analytically solving the CME for each set in the partition P = {P1 , P2 , . . . , Pk }. We
then compare our results to the Constrained Multiscale Algorithm (CMA) introduced in [8], which approximates
the effective dynamics of the slow variable as a SDE, after estimating the effective drift and diffusion using the
CSSA (Algorithm 2).
5.1. A stochastic simulation algorithm for estimating the conditional probability (CSSA). Our
next task is to estimate the conditional distribution P(F |S = s) of the fast variable F given a value s of the slow
variable S. One possible approach for doing this relies on the CSSA algorithm to globally integrate the effective
dynamics of the slow variable. One iteration of the CSSA is given in Algorithm 2. Ideally, one repeats steps
1–6 of Algorithm 2 and samples values of F until the distribution P(F |S = s) converges. In practice, we run
Algorithm 2 until Lc changes of the slow variable S occur. This computation is done for each value in the range
of the slow variable S = {s1 , s2 , . . . , s|S| }.
5.2. An analytical derivation of the conditional distribution. An alternative approach which we follow in this paper relies on an analytical computation of the conditional distribution P(F |S = s), thus eliminating
11
Algorithm 2 One iteration of the CSSA for computing the conditional distribution P(F |S = s) of the fast
variable F given a value s of the slow variable S
m
X
1: Compute the propensity functions αi (t), for i = 1, 2, . . . , m, and their sum α0 (t) =
αi (t).
i=1
2: Generate r1 and r2 , two uniformly distributed random numbers in (0, 1).
3: Compute the next reaction time as t + τ where τ = − log(r1 )/α0 (t).
4: Use r2 to select reaction Rj which occurs at time t + τ
(each reaction Ri , i = 1, 2, . . . , m occurs with probability αi /α0 ).
5: If the slow variable S changes its current state from s to s0 6= s due to reaction Rj occurring, reset S = s to
its previous value, while not changing the value of the fast variable F .
6: If any of the variables Xi goes outside the boundary of the considered domain, then revert to the state of
the system in Step 4 before reaction Rj occurred.
X1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
X2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
S
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
X10
2
0
2
0
3
4
2
4
2
1
5
6
4
6
4
3
7
8
6
5
X20
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
S0
8
6
8
6
7
8
6
8
6
7
7
8
6
8
6
7
7
8
6
7
Rj
1
2
3
4
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
4
5
αj /α0
7.8 × 10−3
7.8 × 10−5
1.5 × 10−2
1.6 × 10−3
9.7 × 10−1
7.3 × 10−3
2.0 × 10−4
2.1 × 10−2
6.7 × 10−3
5.4 × 10−2
9.1 × 10−1
5.4 × 10−3
3.0 × 10−4
3.1 × 10−2
1.6 × 10−2
2.7 × 10−1
6.7 × 10−1
5.0 × 10−2
3.7 × 10−2
9.1 × 10−1
αj
96
0.96
184.38
19.75
12000
64
1.92
184.38
59.25
480
8000
32
1.6
184.38
98.75
1600
4000
184.38
138.25
3360
Table 5.1
Illustrative example CS-II. The set of all ground states of the system (x1 , x2 ) corresponding to the slow variable S = X1 +2X2 =
7. We denote by (x01 , x02 ) the states reachable from (x1 , x2 ) in one transition step, and by S 0 the associated corresponding slow
variable such that S 0 = X10 + 2X20 . Rj denotes the reaction channel that takes the chemical system from state (x1 , x2 ) to (x01 , x02 ),
with corresponding propensity αj . We highlight in bold letters the subset of all states via which the system can transition in one
step from the slow variable S = 7 to S = 8.
the need for any expensive stochastic simulations. We illustrate in Figure 5.1 the transition diagrams for the two
chemical systems we consider in this paper. For chemical system CS-II, the system can transition from a given
state (x1 , x2 ) to four adjacent distinct O-states: to (x1 − 2, x2 + 1) via channel R5 , to (x1 + 2, x2 − 1) via channel
R6 , to (x1 − 1, x2 ) via channels R2 and R4 , and finally to state (x1 + 1, x2 ) via channels R1 and R3 . However,
in terms of the underlying slow variable S, the system can transition to only two adjacent states S = s − 1 (via
channels R2 and R4 ) and S = s + 1 (via channels R1 and R3 ), or remain at the current state S = s, via channels
R5 and R6 . Considering the subsystem of fast reactions of CS-II and conditioning on the line s = x1 + 2x2 , the
stationary CME takes the form
0 = k5 (x1 + 2)(x1 + 1) P(X1 = x1 + 2, X2 = x2 − 1) + k6 (x2 + 1) P(X1 = x1 − 2, X2 = x2 + 1)
− (k5 x1 (x1 − 1) + k6 x2 ) P(X1 = x1 , X2 = x2 ).
Thus, the conditional distribution for CS-II is, for 0 ≤ x1 ≤ s, given by
C
P(F = x1 |S = s) =
x1 ! x2 !
k5
k6
x2
C
=
x1 ! ((s − x1 )/2)!
12
k5
k6
(s−x1 )/2
,
if (s − x1 ) is an even number.
(a)
(b)
!
!
!"'(#$)*%&
!"'(#$)(%&
+.&
*,&
!
*(&
!"#$%&
*-&
!"#"$%&"
!%#$
!")(#$%&
!"'*#$%&
+(&
+-&
!
!"#$%&
+*&
+,&
!"#$
!")*#$%&
*+&
+/&
!"#$'(%&
!")(#$'(%&
!")(#$'*%&
!"'"$%&"
!
!
Fig. 5.1. Transition diagrams for the two chemical systems: (a) CS-I; and (b) CS-II.
Ps−1
S=s −1
Ps
s −1
Θ1
Ps+1
s
Θ1
S=s
s
S=s +1
s+1
Θ2
Θ2
Fig. 5.2. The Markov chain on the slow variable state space, using the aggregated transition probabilities (5.1)–(5.2) for the
chemical system CS-II.
Here, C is the normalization constants and P(F = x1 |S = s) = 0 if (s − x1 ) is an odd number.
A similar argument can be used for CS-I. The stationary CME of the fast subsystem of CS-I is written as
0 = k2 (x1 + 1) P(X1 = x1 + 1, X2 = x2 − 1) + k3 (x2 + 1) P(X1 = x1 − 1, X2 = x2 + 1)
− (k2 x1 + k3 x2 ) P(X1 = x1 , X = x2 ).
where s = (x1 + x2 )/2. Thus, the conditional distribution for CS-I is, for 0 ≤ x1 ≤ 2s, given by
x2
2s−x1
C
k2
k2
C
P(F = x1 |S = s) =
=
,
x1 !x2 ! k3
x1 !(2s − x1 )! k3
where C is again the normalization constant.
5.3. Aggregated transition rates and a Markov Chain on the state of slow variables. In the final
step of the ADM-CLE approach, we set up a Markov chain on the state space of slow variables with the end
goal of estimating the stationary distribution of the slow variable. As illustrated in Figure 5.1(b), the system
CS-II can can transition from a given state S = s to two adjacent states S = s − 1 (via reaction channels R2
and R4 ) and S = s + 1 (via channels R1 and R3 ), or it can remain at the current state S = s, via channels R5
and R6 . Consider now the set Ps = {x(i) = (x1 , x2 )(i) |x1 + 2x2 = s}, illustrated as the middle bin in Figure 5.2.
To compute the transition rate between two adjacent bins Ps and Ps+1 , one has to aggregate over possible ways
(s)
of getting from an observable state in bin Ps to an observable state in bin Ps+1 . We compute Θ1 to be the
(i)
(j)
aggregated transition rate from state Ps to state Ps+1 , over all possible states (x , x ), such that x(i) ∈ PS
and x(j) ∈ Ps+1 , by
Θs1 =
X
X
(i)
P(F = x1 |S = s)
m
X
αk (x(i) ) Q(x(i) , x(j) , Rk )
(5.1)
k=1
x(i) ∈Ps x(j) ∈Ps+1
where Q(x(i) , x(j) , Rk ) denotes the indicator functions of whether one can transition from the O-state x(i) to
O-state x(j) via reaction Rk . We define similarly the aggregated transition rate Θs2 , that the chemical system
transitions from the slow variable state Ps to Ps−1 by
Θs2 =
X
X
(i)
P(F = x1 |S = s)
m
X
αk (x(i) ) Q(x(i) , x(j) , Rk )
(5.2)
k=1
x(i) ∈Ps x(j) ∈Ps−1
We illustrate in Figure 5.3 the aggregated transition rates between the slow state S = s and its adjacent states
S = s − 1 and S = s + 1, for all values of the slow variable S. Note that in the derivations (5.1) and (5.2), we
13
(a)
(b)
3500
3000
5000
0
4500
−200
4000
−400
3500
−600
Θ1 − Θ2
2000
Θ2
Θ1
2500
(c)
3000
2500
1500
2000
1000
500
1500
−1200
1000
−1400
500
50
100
150
200
slow variable S
250
−800
−1000
300
−1600
50
100
150
200
slow variable S
250
300
50
100
150
200
slow variable S
250
300
Fig. 5.3. Plot of the aggregated transition rates for the illustrative example CS-II: (a) Θ1 ; (b) Θ2 ; and (c) Θ1 − Θ2 .
(a)
(b)
Error = 0.028239
Error = 0.0033892
0.018
ADM−CLE
exact solution
0.025
ADM−CLE
exact solution
0.016
0.014
0.012
π(s)
π(s)
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.005
0.002
0
140
160
180
200
220
240
0
260
s
50
100
150
200
250
300
s
Fig. 5.4. The final estimated stationary distribution of the slow variable S for the ADM-CLE approach, computed without
knowledge of the slow variable, for (a) the chemical system CS-I; and (b) the chemical system CS-II. (blue histograms). Red solid
lines are exact solutions computed by solving the CME of the full model and using the corresponding definition of the slow variable.
can either rely on the CSSA algorithm to sample from the conditional distribution of fast variables given values
for the slow variables, as shown in Section 5.1, or use the analytic formulation which is possible to derived for
both CS-I and CS-II, see Section 5.2.
Finally, we compute the solution to the stationary CME associated to the system in Figure 5.2 which can be
written as
s
s
0 = Θs−1
π(s − 1) + Θs+1
1
2 π(s + 1) − (Θ1 + Θ2 ) π(s),
(5.3)
where π(s) ≈ P(S = s) is the probability that S = s at time t. Assuming that π(s) = 0 for all s 6∈ S and
using no-flux boundary conditions, we arrive at a linear system. The eigenvector of the resulting matrix, with
associated eigenvalue λ = 0, yields an approximate solution of the stationary CME, which we plot in blue in
Figure 5.4. Our result is visually indistinguishable from the exact solution (plotted as the red solid line).
5.4. A comparison with the Constrained Multiscale Algorithm (CMA). We compare the approach
we introduced in the previous Section 5.3 with the CMA method proposed in [8]. We compare the results of the
two methods with the ground truth, and record the error defined as
X
Error π, P(S = s) =
π(s) − P(S = s) ,
(5.4)
s∈S
where P(S = s) denotes the ground truth probability distribution of the slow, and π denotes the estimated
solution, either by the CMA and or the ADM-CLE. As Table 5.2 shows, the ADM-CLE approach yields lower
errors compared to the CMA algorithm, even when we run the latter with the parameter Lc as large as 20,000.
Note that for the chemical system CS-I, the ground truth probability distribution of the slow variable P(S = s)
can be easily computed using the multivariate Poisson distribution, as discussed in Section 2.1. For the second
chemical system CS-II, we consider as ground truth the solution obtained by solving the associated CME of the
full model in a large (truncated) domain.
14
CS-I
CS-II
Lc = 100
0.21768
0.66641
Lc = 500
0.089228
0.49063
Lc = 2, 000
0.10723
0.14206
Lc = 5, 000
0.045092
0.070711
Lc = 10, 000
0.040542
0.12937
Lc = 20, 000
0.066988
0.10995
ADM-CLE
0.003389
0.028239
Table 5.2
The distance (as measured by the error in (5.4)) between the estimated and the ground truth probability distributions of the
slow variable, for the CMA algorithm which runs the CSSA algorithm for each value of the slow variable S = s, until Lc changes
of the slow variable occur. The rightmost column shows the recovery errors for our proposed Markov-based approach.
Error = 0.40385
0.04
Error = 0.1225
0.03
CMA
exact solution
0.035
Error = 0.055016
CMA
exact solution
0.025
0.025
Error = 0.053468
CMA
exact solution
0.025
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.015
0.015
π(s)
0.02
π(s)
π(s)
0.025
π(s)
CMA
exact solution
0.03
0.015
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.005
0.015
0.01
0.01
0.005
140
160
180
200
220
240
0
260
140
160
180
s
220
240
0
260
140
160
180
s
(a) L = 100
0.02
0
260
140
160
180
0.025
0.025
0.02
0.02
0.015
200
220
240
260
s
(d) L = 100, 000
Error = 0.039577
CMA KDE
exact solution
0.03
π(s)
π(s)
0.025
240
Error = 0.066556
CMA KDE
exact solution
0.03
0.03
220
(c) L = 10, 000
Error = 0.1133
CMA KDE
exact solution
200
s
(b) L = 1, 000
Error = 0.31617
0.035
π(s)
200
CMA KDE
exact solution
0.03
0.025
π(s)
0
0.005
0.015
0.02
0.015
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
140
160
180
200
220
s
(e) L = 100
240
260
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.005
0.005
0
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
s
0
140
160
180
200
220
s
(f) L = 1, 000
(g) L = 10, 000
240
260
0
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
s
(h) L = 100, 000
Fig. 5.5. (a)–(d) The stationary distribution of the slow variable computed by the CMA for CS-I, using knowledge of the slow
variable (blue histograms). The red solid line is the exact solution, P(S = s), obtained by solving the CME of the full system CS-I.
The CMA approach runs the CSSA algorithm for each value of the slow variable S = s until Lc = {102 , 103 , 104 , 105 } changes of
the slow variable occur. Panels (e)–(f) show the CMA-computed distribution after smoothing out by the Kernel Density Estimation
procedure.
In Table 5.2 we show numerical results that highlight the accuracy improvement of the ADM-CLE approach
compared to the CMA approach of [8]. For the latter method, we run the CSSA algorithm [8] for each value of
the slow variable, until Lc changes of the slow variable occur. As expected, the accuracy of the CMA algorithm
improves as Lc increases, at the cost of additional computational running time of the method. In comparison,
our stochastic simulation free approach yields significantly more accurate results, with errors that are at least
one order of magnitude lower than the CMA method with L = 20, 000. We plot in Figures 5.5 and 5.6 (top
rows) the estimated stationary distribution of the CMA method for both chemical systems considered throughout
this paper, for several values of the L parameter. The bottom rows of the same Figures 5.5 and 5.6 show the
estimated distribution, after smoothing out by the Kernel Density Estimation (KDE).
6. Summary and discussion. In this paper we have introduced an ADM-CLE approach for detecting
intrinsic slow variables in high-dimensional dynamic data, generated by stochastic dynamical systems. In the
original ADM framework, the local bursts of simulations initiated at each data point to estimate the local
covariances are computationally expensive, a shortcoming we avoid by using an approximation of the CLE. A
second innovation that further improved the computational performance relates to the underlying similarity
graph, a starting point for the diffusion map approach. By exploiting the spectrum of each local covariance
matrix, we built a sparse ellipsoid-like neighborhood graph at each point in the data set, with the end result of
being able to build a sparse similarity graph that requires the computation of a much smaller number of distances,
which makes the ADM-CLE approach scalable to networks with thousands or even tens of thousands of nodes.
For the two illustrative examples considered in this paper, the size of the resulting graphs is N = 10, 201 for
CS-I, and N = 12, 100 for CS-II, respectively. Had these graphs been complete graphs, the number of resulting
weighted edges would be over 50 million, while in our computations, the number of edges is approximately 2.9
million for CS-I, and 3.9 million for CS-II.
We have proposed a spectral-based method for inferring the slow variable present within the chemical sys15
Error = 0.68339
0.035
Error = 0.19916
CMA
exact solution
Error = 0.12937
CMA
exact solution
0.02
Error = 0.080234
0.018
CMA
exact solution
0.018
0.016
0.03
0.025
0.014
0.014
0.015
0.012
0.015
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.005
50
100
150
200
250
0
300
50
100
150
200
250
0.006
0.006
0.004
0.004
0.002
π(s)
150
200
s
(e) L = 100
250
300
π(s)
0.012
0.005
0
300
0.01
0.014
0.014
0.012
0.012
0.01
0.006
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.002
250
0
0
300
s
CMA KDE
exact solution
0.008
0.002
50
100
150
200
s
(f) L = 1, 000
300
0.01
0.006
200
250
Error = 0.1174
0.004
150
200
0.016
0.006
100
150
0.018
CMA KDE
exact solution
0.008
50
100
(d) L = 100, 000
0.008
0
50
Error = 0.16161
0.014
0.01
250
s
0.016
0.016
0.015
200
0.018
CMA KDE
exact solution
0.018
0.02
150
(c) L = 10, 000
Error = 0.18977
CMA KDE
exact solution
100
100
s
(b) L = 1, 000
Error = 0.65294
0.025
50
50
s
(a) L = 100
π(s)
0.008
0
0
300
0.01
0.008
0.002
s
0
0.01
π(s)
0
π(s)
π(s)
π(s)
π(s)
0.012
0.02
CMA
exact solution
0.016
(g) L = 10, 000
250
300
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
s
(h) L = 100, 000
Fig. 5.6. (a)–(d) The stationary distribution of the slow variable computed by the CMA for CS-II, using knowledge of the slow
variable (blue histograms). The red solid line is the exact solution, P(S = s), obtained by solving the CME of the full system CS-II.
The CMA approach runs the CSSA algorithm for each value of the slow variable S = s until Lc = {102 , 103 , 104 , 105 } changes of
the slow variable occur. Panels (e)–(f) show the CMA-computed distribution after smoothing out by the Kernel Density Estimation
procedure.
tem without any prior knowledge of its structure, and a Markov-based approach for estimating its stationary
distribution. We augment the proposed algorithmic approach with numerical simulations that confirm that the
ADM-CLE approach can compare favorably for some systems to the CMA for estimating the stationary distribution of such slow variables. The ADM-CLE approach can also be applied to systems with a low number of
states of slow variables. The CMA, as introduced in [8], is more suitable for systems where the slow variable(s)
can take many different values, because the CMA uses an underlying SDE approximation for the behaviour of
the slow variables. One option to overcome this problem is to estimate effective propensity functions of the slow
subsystem [9]. An open question is to extend the ADM-CLE to systems where the range of the Xi variables is
very large. In the ADM-CLE approach applied to CS-I or CS-II, we associate a state (i.e., node in the initial
graph) to each possible combination of pairs of states (x1 , x2 ), an approach no longer feasible whenever the range
of the variables is large. To bypass this problem, one could change the discretization of the state space and
modify accordingly the Markov chain based approach (Figure 5.2) used in the ADM-CLE.
The ADM-CLE couples a method for finding slow variables (ADM) with an approach to compute the stationary distribution of a multiscale chemical reaction network. Chemical systems depend on a number of parameters
(e.g. kinetic rate constants) and an open question is to extend the ADM approach to situations where one (or
more) parameters are varied, i.e. to perform bifurcation analysis of multiscale stochastic chemical systems [30].
Finally, we point out recent work of Dsilva et al. [11], who also rely on the ADM framework to discover
nonlinear intrinsic variables in high-dimensional data in the context of multiscale simulations, with the task
of merging different simulations ensembles or partial observations of such ensembles in a globally consistent
manner. Their work is motivated by the fact that often one is not merely interested in extracting the hidden
(slow) variables from the underlying low-dimensional manifold, given partial observations x(i) , i = 1, 2, . . . , N as
in the ADM setting, but also in extending high-dimensional functions on a set of points lying in a low-dimensional
manifold. Their proposed approach relies on the so called Laplacian Pyramids [35], a multiscale algorithm for
extending a high-dimensional function defined on a set of points in the space of intrinsic variables to a second
set of points not in the data set, by using Laplacian kernels of decreasing bandwidths (the ε parameter in (3.5)).
REFERENCES
[1] A. Arkin, J. Ross, and H. McAdams, Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage l-infected
Escherichia Coli cells, Genetics, 149 (1998), pp. 1633–1648.
[2] M. Belkin and P. Niyogi, Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation., Neural Computation,
15 (2003), pp. 1373–1396.
16
[3] Y. Cao, D. Gillespie, and L. Petzold, Multiscale stochastic simulation algorithm with stochastic partial equilibrium assumption for chemically reacting systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 206 (2005), pp. 395–411.
[4] Y. Cao, D. T. Gillespie, and L. R. Petzold, The slow-scale stochastic simulation algorithm, Journal of Chemical Physics,
122 (2005).
[5] Y. Cao, H. Li, and L. Petzold, Efficient formulation of the stochastic simulation algorithm for chemically reacting systems,
Journal of Chemical Physics, 121 (2004), pp. 4059–4067.
[6] R. R. Coifman and S. Lafon, Diffusion maps, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 21 (2006), pp. 5–30.
[7] R. R. Coifman, S. Lafon, A. B. Lee, M. Maggioni, B. Nadler, F. Warner, and S. W. Zucker, Geometric diffusions as
a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: Diffusion maps, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (2005), pp. 7426–7431.
[8] S. Cotter, K. Zygalakis, I. Kevrekidis, and R. Erban, A constrained approach to multiscale stochastic simulation of
chemically reacting systems, Journal of Chemical Physics, 135(9), 094102 (2011).
[9] S. Cotter and R. Erban, Error analysis of diffusion approximation methods for multiscale systems in reaction kinetics,
submitted (2014), available as: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5755
[10] D. L. Donoho and C. Grimes, Hessian eigenmaps: Locally linear embedding techniques for high-dimensional data, Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100 (2003), pp. 5591–5596.
[11] C. J. Dsilva, R. Talmon, N. Rabin, R. Coifman, and I. Kevrekidis, Nonlinear intrinsic variables and state reconstruction
in multiscale simulations, Journal of Chemical Physics, 139 (2013), p. 184109.
[12] A. Duncan, S. Liao, T. Vejchodsky, R. Erban and R. Grima, Noise-induced multistability in chemical systems: Discrete
vs Continuum modeling, to appear in Physical Review E (2015), available as: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.8256
[13] W. E, D. Liu, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Nested stochastic simulation algorithm for chemical kinetic systems with disparate
rates., Journal of Chemical Physics, 123 (2005), p. 194107.
[14] R. Erban, I. Kevrekidis, and H. Othmer, An equation-free computational approach for extracting population-level behavior
from individual-based models of biological dispersal, Physica D, 215 (2006), pp. 1–24.
[15] R. Erban, I. Kevrekidis, D. Adalsteinsson and T. Elston, Gene regulatory networks: a coarse-grained, equation-free
approach to multiscale computation, Journal of Chemical Physics, 124 (2006), 084106
[16] R. Erban, T. Frewen, X. Wang, T. Elston, R. Coifman, B. Nadler and I. Kevrekidis, Variable-free exploration of
stochastic models: a gene regulatory network example, Journal of Chemical Physics, 126 (2007), 155103
[17] F. Fogel, R. Jenatton, F. Bach, and A. d’Aspremont, Convex relaxations for permutation problems., in NIPS, C. J. C.
Burges, L. Bottou, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Q. Weinberger, eds., 2013, pp. 1016–1024.
[18] W. C. Gear, J. M. Hyman, P. G. Kevrekidid, I. G. Kevrekidis, O. Runborg, and C. Theodoropoulos, Equation-Free,
Coarse-Grained Multiscale Computation: Enabling Macroscopic Simulators to Perform System-Level Analysis, Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 1 (2003), pp. 715–762.
[19] M. Gibson and J. Bruck, Effcient exact stochastic simulation of chemical systems with many species and many channels,
Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 104 (2000), pp. 1876–1889.
[20] D. T. Gillepsie, The chemical Langevin equation, Journal of Chemical Physics, 113 (2000), pp. 297–306.
, A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions, Journal of
[21]
Computational Physics, 22 (1976), pp. 403–434.
, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 81 (1977), pp. 2340–2361.
[22]
[23] R. Grima, P. Thomas, A. Straube, How accurate are the chemical Langevin and Fokker-Planck equations?, Journal of
Chemical Physics, 135 (2011), 084103.
[24] M. Haataja, D. J. Srolovitz, and I. G. Kevrekidis, Apparent hysteresis in a driven system with self-organized drag., Phys
Rev Lett, 92 (2004), p. 160603.
[25] E. L. Haseltine and J. B. Rawlings, Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic chemical
kinetics, Journal of Chemical Physics, 117 (2002), pp. 6959–6969.
[26] T. Jahnke and W. Huisinga, Solving the chemical master equation for monomolecular reaction systems analytically, Journal
of Mathematical Biology, 54 (2007), pp. 1–26.
[27] S. Kar, W. Baumann, M. Paul, and J. Tyson, Exploring the roles of noise in the eukaryotic cell cycle, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, USA, 16 (2009), pp. 6471–6476.
[28] G. Klingbeil, R. Erban, M. Giles, and P. K. Maini, STOCHSIMGPU: Parallel stochastic simulation for the Systems
Biology Toolbox 2 for MATLAB, Bioinformatics, 27 (2011), pp. 1170-1171.
[29] H. W. Kuhn, The Hungarian method for the assignment problem, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2 (1955), pp. 83–97.
[30] S. Liao, T. Vejchodsky, R. Erban, Parameter estimation and bifurcation analysis of stochastic models of gene regulatory
networks: tensor-structured methods, submitted (2015), available as: http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7825
[31] L. Lovász, Random walks on graphs: A survey, Combinatorics, Paul Erdös is Eighty, 2 (1993), pp. 1–46.
[32] M. Meila and J. Shi, A random walks view of spectral segmentation, AI and STATISTICS (AISTATS), (2001).
[33] M. Newman, Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices, Physical Review E, 74 (2006).
[34] A. Y. Ng, M. I. Jordan, and Y. Weiss, On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm, NIPS: Proceedings of the 15th
Annual Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (2001).
[35] N. Rabin and R. R. Coifman, Heterogeneous datasets representation and learning using diffusion maps and laplacian pyramids, in Proceedings of the Twelfth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Anaheim, California, USA, April
26-28, 2012., 2012, pp. 189–199.
[36] S. Roweis and L. Saul, Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by local linear embedding, Science, 290 (2000), pp. 2323–2326.
[37] H. Salis and Y. Kaznessis, Accurate hybrid stochastic simulation of a system of coupled chemical or biochemical reactions,
Journal of Chemical Physics, 122 (2005), p. 054103.
[38] J. Shi and J. Malik, Normalized cuts and image segmentation, IEEE Transcations of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22 (2000), pp. 888–905.
[39] A. Singer, R. Erban, I. G. Kevrekidis, and R. R. Coifman, Detecting intrinsic slow variables in stochastic dynamical
systems by anisotropic diffusion maps, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (2009), pp. 16090–16095.
[40] D. Spielman and S.-H. Teng, Spectral partitioning works: Planar graphs and finite element meshes, FOCS ’96: Proceedings
of the 37th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, (1996), pp. 96–107.
[41]
, Spectral partitioning works: Planar graphs and finite element meshes, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 421 (2007),
17
pp. 284–305.
[42] Y. Sun, W. Lin and R. Erban, Time delay can facilitate coherence in self-driven interacting particle systems, Physical Review
E, 90 (2014), 062708
[43] E. Vanden-Eijnden, Numerical techniques for multi-scale dynamical systems with stochastic effects, Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 1 (2003), pp. 385–391.
[44] J. Villar, H. Kueh, N. Barkai, and S. Leibler, Mechanisms of noise-resistance in genetic oscillators, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99 (2002), pp. 5988–5992.
[45] U. von Luxburg, A tutorial on spectral clustering, Technical Report 149, Max Plank Institute for Biological Cybernetics,
(2006).
[46] J. Wilkie and Y. M. Wong, Positivity preserving chemical Langevin equations, Chemical Physics, 353 (2008), pp. 132–138.
[47] X. Zhou, M. Belkin, and N. Srebro, An iterated graph Laplacian approach for ranking on manifolds, in Proceedings of the
17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’11, New York, NY, USA,
2011, ACM, pp. 877–885.
18
| 5cs.CE
|
BRINGING SIMULATION TO APPLICATION :
PRESENTATION OF A GLOBAL APPROACH IN THE DESIGN OF
PASSIVE SOLAR BUILDINGS UNDER HUMID TROPICAL CLIMATES
F. GARDE,* H. BOYER,* R. CELAIRE**
Laboratoire de Génie Industriel, University of Reunion Island, IUT de Saint Pierre,
40 avenue de Soweto, Saint-Pierre, Reunion Island, 97 410, France,
(+262) 96 28 91, (+262) 96 28 99, [email protected]
** Concept Energie, 1 rue Mirabeau, Lambesc, 13410, France,
(+33) 04 42 92 84 19, (+33) 04 42 92 71 36, [email protected]
Abstract – In early 1995, a DSM pilot initiative has been launched in the French islands of Guadeloupe and Reunion through a
partnership between several public and private partners (the French Public Utility EDF, the University of Reunion Island, low cost
housing companies, architects, energy consultants, etc...) to set up standards to improve thermal design of new residential b uildings
in tropical climates. This partnership led to defining optimized bio-climatic urban planning and architectural designs featuring the
use of passive cooling architectural principles (solar shading, natural ventilation) and components, as well as energy effici ent
systems and technologies. The design and sizing of each architectural component on internal thermal comfort in building has been
assessed with a validated thermal and airflow building simulation software (CODYRUN). These technical specifications have been
edited in a reference document which has been used to build over 300 new pilot dwellings through the years 1996-1998 in Reunion
Island and in Guadeloupe. An experimental monitoring has been made in these first ECODOM dwellings in 1998 and 1999. It will
result in experimental validation of impact of the passive cooling strategies on thermal comfort of occupants leading to modify
specifications if necessary. The paper present all the methodology used for the elaboration of ECODOM, from the simulations to
the experimental results. This follow up is important, as the setting up of the ECODOM standard will be the first step towards the
setting up of thermal regulations in the French overseas territories, by the year 2002.
1. INTRODUCTION
2
2. THE ECODOM STANDARD
3
2.1 THE OBJECTIVES
2.2 THE PRESCRIPTIONS
3
4
3. METHODOLOGY
5
4. ECODOM : THE REFERENCE DOCUMENT
6
4.1 SOLAR PROTECTION
4.2 NATURAL VENTILATION
4.3 DOMESTIC HOT WATER
7
8
9
5. PRESENTATION OF AN ECODOM PROJECT : “LA DECOUVERTE”
10
6. THE SOCIOLOGICAL AND TECHNICAL MONITORING
12
6.1 DESCRIPTION
6.2 PRESENTATION OF SOME EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
6.3 SYNTHESIS
12
13
15
7. CONCLUSION
16
1
1. INTRODUCTION
Each year 20,000 dwellings are built in the French Overseas Territories. There are four French Overseas
Territories (called DOM) : two islands are located in the Caribbean (Martinique and Guadeloupe), one island
is situated 400 km to the east of Madagascar in the Indian Ocean (Reunion Island) while the fourth DOM
(French Guyana) is in South America North of Brazil. Each one of these DOM experiences a hot and humid
climate, tropical for the islands of Guadeloupe, Martinique and Reunion and equatorial for French Guyana.
Two thirds of these new dwellings are social housing. Initially these new dwellings were built without air
conditioning or hot water. This situation has led to haphazard installation of instant electrical hot water boilers
and poorly located, designed, sized, and maintained individual air conditioning systems. The lack of building
codes on thermal design of buildings, combined with designs widely inspired from temperate climates together
with economic constraints of tight budgets for public constructions have led to the development of buildings
totally unfitted to tropical climate. Large population increase in these DOM, rise in living standards, and the
decreasing costs of air conditioning systems result in a real energy, economical and environmental problem.
When considering economical aspects, high electricity production cost also creates continual high deficit
for the French Electricity Utility (EDF). EDF loses 350 millions Euros every year in overseas territories. The
average selling price of electricity is less than 9 Euro cents (less then half the real production-distribution cost)
because of the French pricing policy (selling price of electricity is the same as in mainland France).
All these factors point out that passive solar cooling for thermal design of buildings is of great economical,
social and environmental relevance. A long term overall program to improve comfort and energy performance
in residential and commercial buildings has been set up in these DOM. In the new housing sector, a quality
standard label has been launched concerning the building envelope, hot water production systems and air
conditioning systems and components.
2
2. THE ECODOM STANDARD
A Demand Side Management pilot initiative called ECODOM was launched in early 1995 in the French
islands of Guadeloupe and Reunion through a partnership between the French electricity utility (EDF), the
French authority for environment and energy conservation (ADEME), the ministries of Housing, of Industry
and of Overseas Territories, the University of Reunion island and several other public and private partners,
such as low cost housing companies, architects, energy consultants, etc...
2.1 The objectives
ECODOM standard aims to facilitate construction of naturally ventilated comfortable dwellings whilst
avoiding the usual necessity of electricity driven compression air cooling. The ECODOM standard provides
simple technical specifications to do so, at an affordable price.
Existing bibliography on passive thermal design of buildings is extremely rich and varied. Publications
often focus either on the optimization of one component of building (Bansal, 1992), (Malama, 1996),
(Rousseau 1996) (Peuportier, 1995) or on the presentation of a performing bio-climatic project (Filippin et al,
1998), (Ashley and Reynolds, 1993) or on global approach of building with a description of the passive solar
strategies to implement in it (Garg, 1991), (Hassid, 1985), (Millet, 1988), (Gandemer 1992). These
publications often have an obvious interest for building physicists but cannot be easily applicable in a national
overall program to generalize improvement of thermal performances of buildings : because scientific
preoccupations are often far from economical building reality. In addition architects and engineers lack of time
to learn to use scientific tools and to read research reports in the fields of thermal design of building. Thus, to
bridge the gap between building designers and building physicists, a simple, straightforward and pedagogical
language must be spoken.
Another objective of the ECODOM project was to define simple rules which can be easily understood by
the whole building community.
3
Finally, ECODOM has also social objectives because more than half of the 20 000 dwellings in the French
overseas territories are built by public housing companies. ECODOM allows to give basic thermal comfort to
people who will never be able to afford air conditioning investments and subsequent electricity bills.
A reference document comprising a pedagogical presentation of the technical passive options was published
in 1996. This document enables all building designers to speak the same language in the study of future
ECODOM buildings.
Once the document was made, the next step was obviously to implement the standard to 300 pilot new
dwellings throughout the years 1996-1998, then, after a technical and sociological validation period, to expand
this pilot phase to the residential sector on a much broader scale (objective of 2000 new dwellings per year),
and complete similar global energy efficiency projects to existing housing and to large and medium size
commercial buildings. Then, the experimental feed back will allow the setting up of thermal regulations in the
new housing sector by the year 2002 (see figure 1).
Fig. 1 : The ECODOM process
2.2 The prescriptions
Comfort level is reached through an architectural building design adapted to local climate : the dwelling is
protected from the negative climatic parameters (mainly the sun) and benefits from positive climatic factors
(the wind).
Achievement of a good level of thermal comfort requires respecting various compulsary rules. These rules
concern immediate surroundings of the dwelling and envelope components. These rules cover five issues:
1) Location on site (vegetation around the building);
2) Solar protection (roof, walls, windows);
3) Natural ventilation (exploitation of trade winds, and optimized ratio of inside/outside air-permeability of
dwelling envelope) or mechanical ventilation (ceiling fans);
4
4) Domestic hot water production ( solar water heaters , efficient gas water heaters or properly designed
off-peak hours servo-controlled high efficiency storage electric water heaters);
5) As an option, high efficiency intermittent air conditioning systems for bedrooms (air tightness of rooms,
efficient components, controls,..).
3. METHODOLOGY
To define these quality standards specifications, a large number of simulations were computed for each
component of building envelope in order to quantify thermal and energetic impact of each one on thermal
comfort within the building. Various authors have already worked on specific issues concerning the outside
structure of the building : (Bansal, 92) on the effect of external color, (Malama, 96) on passive cooling
strategies for roofs and walls, (Rousseau, 96) on the effect of natural ventilation, (De Walls 93) on global
considerations on the building adapted for a defined climate.
Our approach consisted in studying typical dwellings, selected as the most representative types of the ones
built in the Reunion island, in terms of architecture and building materials (see figure 2).
Fig. 2 : Typical dwelling
Simulations were carried out with the use of a building thermal and airflow simulation software on
envelope components (roof, walls, windows) and on natural ventilation, in a way allowing to estimate the
influence of each one of the above specifications in terms of thermal comfort and energetic performances. This
has led to the definition of efficient passive technical specifications for each comprising part of building
envelope and likewise to a minimum porosity ratio for optimizing natural ventilation. These simulations, their
analysis and synthetic results have been presented in (Garde, 99a) and (Garde 99b).
5
4. ECODOM : THE REFERENCE DOCUMENT
We will illustrate here after some of the final results which are presented in the ECODOM reference
document (Celaire, 1997). This reference document is essential since it is used as a common tool for study and
design of new ECODOM projects by architects, building physicists and engineers.
4.1 Solar protection
In humid tropical climate, source of uncomfort result from internal temperature increase due to poor
architectural design, primarily due to lack of solar protection (shading). 80% of temperature rises are due to
solar radiation and the remaining to conduction exchanges. Setting up efficient solar protection specifications
is the second fundamental step in thermal design of buildings. This protection concerns all external
components of dwelling envelope : roof, walls and windows.
Solar protection of the roof
Roofs can account for up to 60% of overall envelope heat gains in dwellings. Efficient solar protection of
roofs is therefore of prime necessity for optimal thermal design.
The following table is valid for terraced roofs, tilted roofs without attics, or roofs with closed or barely
ventilated attics.
Table 1 only gives results for polystyrene and polyurethane, as these types of insulation are the most
commonly used at an affordable price in humid tropical climates. Other alternatives exist (low emissivity
materials for instance) and can be used if their equivalent thermal resistance is sufficient compared to values
given in Table 1.
Table 1 : Roof solar protection
6
Solar protection of walls
Thermal gains from walls account for 20 to 30% (40 à 65 % for dwellings which are not under roof) of
overall envelope heat gains in dwellings. Various solutions enable efficient solar protection of walls from
sunlight : horizontal or vertical overhangs or sun-breakers, thermal insulation. Results obtained from
simulations lead to the table 2 which give, for Reunion island, optimum dimensions of overhang according to
wall orientation and to wall thermal resistance.
Table 2 : Overhang - minimum d/h ratio values to be respected.
Table 3 : Insulation of walls (in cm) for different orientations and external colours (for a conductivity of
0.041 W/m.K)
When walls do not have overhangs or shading systems, minimum insulation thickness (in cm) required for
the various types of walls and various orientations are shown in table 3.
If values of d/h seem excessive, other alternatives such as vertical shading systems or double-skin systems
with ventilated air-gaps may be considered. In that specific case, no sizing specifications are needed for each
wall orientation (shading effect is sufficient whatever the orientation is provided the shading component covers
the entire wall surface). Meanwhile, these solar shading principles and sizing values are fully compatible with
the creole architectural components such as verandas and balconies which insure efficient solar protection of
dwellings walls and windows together with creating outdoor living spaces.
Solar protection of windows :
Solar protection of windows is essential, not only because they account for 15 to 30% of overall envelope
heat gains in dwellings but also because they contribute to increasing uncomfort experienced by occupant, due
to the instant heating of ambient air temperature and an exposure to direct or reflected sunlight. All windows
must therefore be protected by some kind of window shading system, such as horizontal overhangs and other
shading devices such as venitian blinds or opaque, mobile louvers (see Fig. 3). Simulations enabled to optimize
geometric characteristics of horizontal overhangs in relationship with glazing. (see table 4).
7
Table 4 : Values of d/(2a+h) (case 1), or d/h (case 2)
Fig. 3 : Some of the shading devices required by ECODOM
4.2 Natural ventilation
In warm climates, natural ventilation is the most usual means of cooling both occupants and buildings :
Natural ventilation, depending on flow-rate values (or air change per hour), can ensure three functions :
Weak flow-rate (1 to 2 ACH) : preservation of hygiene conditions in building by internal air renewal;
Moderate flow-rate (40 ACH): dissipation of internal heat gains and cooling of building envelope;
High flow-rate (more than 100 ACH) : improvement of comfort of occupants by increasing heat transfer
at skin level .
High air speed and even distribution of air flow through dwelling increases sudation process. This is the
only means enabling to create cooling by compensating for simultaneous high temperatures and high
hygrometry.
Our aim is therefore to find exterior/interior walls porosity coupling enabling to reach 40 ACH. On one
hand dwelling envelope will be sufficiently cooled and on the other hand, such ACH values allows to benefit
from wind speeds of 0.2 à 0.5m.s-1, which is largely sufficient, when taking into account climatic parameters
(outside temperature seldom greater than 32°C), to insure good comfort level.
Simulations run in (Garde, 99) and (Garde, 97) showed that critical rate of 40 ACH is obtained for designs
with minimal exterior and interior porosities of 25% whether building is light or high mass. Natural ventilation
is simply more effective during night time for heavy structures, whereas in light structures it serves mainly to
evacuate daytime overheating.
Thus dwellings should have layouts allowing for effective cross ventilation of all rooms (see Fig. 4). At
each level or floor, there should exist openings in each main room, on at least two opposite facades (main
rooms being bedrooms and living, dining room and other living spaces). Interior lay-out should also be
designed to allow outside air to flow through main rooms from one facade to the other through halls, corridors,
doors and other internal openings in room partitions.
8
Fig. 4 : Cross ventilated dwelling
Calculation details needed to determine that exterior and interior porosities are greater than 25% are
reported below. First thing to do is to calculate the mean porosity of two opposite facades of dwelling. Internal
and external porosity required by ECODOM standards is 25% of the mean.
So1
0.25
Sp
So
P2
0.25
Sp
Sp1 Sp 2
Sp
2
Si1 So1 o r So 2
Si 2 So1 o r So 2
P1
So1 : Net surface area of external openings, main rooms (façade 1);
So2 : Net surface area of external openings, main rooms (façade 2);
Sp1, Sp2 : Total surface area of façades 1 and2 of main rooms;
Si1 and Si2 : Total surface area of internal openings.
4.3 Domestic hot water
It is essential that the dwellings are equipped with energy efficient long-lasting and economic, domestic hot
water heating systems. Water heating can be solar, electric or gas or a combination of such systems.
In the case of solar water heaters for example, the system must conform technical control by the french
centre for scientific and technical building studies (C.S.T.B.). Total minimum solar collectors area should be
defined in relationship with the size of dwelling.(see table 5). Capacity of water storage tank should be 60 to
120 liters per square meter of net collector area. Conventional minimum annual productivity should be
700kWh per net square meter of the collector area.
Table 5 : Technical characteristics - solar water heaters
As far as electrical heaters are concerned, they must feature an approved French standard manufacturing
seal (Norme Française). Minimal capacity of water heater and maximum value of cooling constant (defining
storage efficiency of heaters), depending on number of main rooms of dwelling, are required.
9
5. PRESENTATION OF AN ECODOM PROJECT : “LA DECOUVERTE”
At present time, three experimental operations have been built in Reunion Island, and two in Guadeloupe,
what represents a total number of 300 dwellings.
One of these called “La Découverte” is represented by Fig. 5.
44 dwellings were studied with the ECODOM specifications as part of “La Découverte” project.
Fig. 5 : ECODOM “La Découverte” - the original project.
This project started in 1996 when first contacts were taken with project architect and the building owner.
The main problem was to create confident working relationship between physicits and engineers in charge
of promoting Ecodom concept and project architect : to be successful ECODOM design approach had to be
understood not as factor limiting architectural creativity.
Figure 6 illustrates project after application of ECODOM specifications.
Fig. 6 : Modifications of the original project
The ECODOM modifications applied to project are explained here after.
No modification was made for site location because gardens around buildings had already been planned. In
addition project has an optimal orientation as main façades have a north and south orientation, with limited
west and east walls exposure to morning and afternoon low incidence sunrays. Thus the only façade to be
upgraded was the northern one as the southern one is seldom exposed (for the southern hemisphere latitude of
Reunion Island, midday sun shines on southern façade only in december).
As far as solar protection of roof was concerned, architect had already planned 5 cm insulation for red and
blue roofs. According to table 1, it is not enough. Therefore, he was asked to increase insulation thickness up
to 8 cm (value for medium colors) and to use polystyrene as insulation rather than mineral wool. Mineral wool
is fairly cheap but not very well adapted to tropical climates : it loses its thermal properties when it absorbs
ambient humidity .
As far as solar protection of walls is concerned, the color is light and materials used are hollow concrete
blocks. In table 2, it is specified to install 1 cm insulation on East and West sides. The southern façade was
10
not insulated because it is protected by overhangs. In addition as the initial project didn’t provide solar
protection for bedrooms windows, is was specified to add overhangs on exposed windows of northern facade.
However, the solar protection of windows is strongly correlated to the natural ventilation. The bigger the
opening, the wider the overhang must be.
Concerning natural ventilation, dwelling porosity in initial project was not sufficient. For example,
ECODOM standards required for bedrooms a 2 square meters porosity while the initial project only had 1.44
square meter. This is why all initial windows have been replaced by glazed doors in order to increase porosity.
To reach the same porosity indoor,it was asked to add fanlights above the bedroom doors . Balconies were also
added all along the facade for solar protection of windows and of walls (see figure 7).
Fig. 7 : Floor plan of an ECODOM dwelling. Increase in porosity of bedrooms (glazed windows) and
solar protection of northern facade (balconies).
All the modifications expressed above have been taken under considerations by the architect and
integrated into the final project which is represented by Fig.8. The operation « La Découverte » ended in
April, 1999, which is three years after our first contacts with the persons responsible for the project. We
also got through a phase of technical support in the thermal conception to a phase of implementation of the
project. To make the methodoly completed, it only lacks the experimental monitoring and feed back, what
is going to be presented in the following section.
Fig. 8 : The final project (april 1999)
11
6. THE TECHNICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL MONITORING
6.1 Description
An experimental monitoring has been launched for the first ECODOM dwellings in order to validate
experimentally impact of the passive cooling specifications on the performances of the envelope of the building
and on the comfort of occupants.
The campaigns of instrumentation occured on the first two operations ECODOM implemented in Reunion :
the first one has been presented in this paper and the second one was built one year earlier and is called the
operation «La Trinité».
Our objective was firstly to test the performances of the buildings without the occupants. So, we could
make our own scenarios of measure and modify the configurations of apartments without disturbing the
tenants. Secondly, we led a campaign of measure in occupied flats (for the Trinity only) to test the dwellings in
real case.
The measurements results and analysis have been supplemented for the both projects with a sociological
study in inhabitated dwellings in order to understand how thermal comfort, acoustic comfort (in tropical
climates, it might be difficult to obtain thermal comfort and acoustic comfort at the same time), visual comfort
and dwelling environment are appreciated by occupants
Table 6 gives the schedule of the campaigns of measures for the two operations.
Table 6 : Experimental schedule for non occupied and occupied periods
These campaigns happened during the two last warm seasons (on 1998 for « The Trinity » and on 1999 for
« The Discovery ») for estimating the thermal performances of flats during extreme climatic periods (the warm
and wet season in Reunion occurs from the middle of December to the middle of April). The sociological study
12
was led for the operation « The Trinity » in April, 1998. It is also foreseen for « La Découvert » by April,
2000.
With the agreement of the housing companies, in each case (“La Trinité” and “La Découverte”) four
dwellings have been instrumented during the hot season. Dwellings have been selected in order to allow
comparison and studies of various parameters such as roof and walls thermal insulation, natural ventilation.
Thus we chose a flat under roof (et en pignon) and the same flat in a lower level to test the influence of the
roof and of the solar protection of the glazings . The two other instrumented flats are rigorously identical in
orientation and in level or floor, this to test different scenarios such as the effect of natural ventilation with a
flat which serves us as a reference and the second on whom we modify its configuration.
A portable data-logger was set up close to the buildings to record all the climatic data (external temperature
and humidity, direct and diffuse solar radiation, wind speed and wind direction).
During non-occupied period, sensors used are thermocouples for measurement of indoor air temperature,
resultant temperature and surface temperatures on walls and roofs; thermo-hygrometers for the relative
humidity, accurate anemometer for indoor air speed (see fig.9). Data are collected every minute and the
average is made every hour.
During occupied period, sensors are like small “white boxes” with internal memory which can be wall
mounted. They give temperature and hygrometry measurements each 30 minutes during several months.
Fig. 9 : Measurements of indoor air and resultant temperature inside dwelling
6.2 Presentation of some experimental results
We shall present in this section only some significant experimental results. The whole results and their
analysis are contained in two research reports (one for the operation “La Trinité” and one for the operation «
La Découverte ») available with the authors.
Impact of the solar protection of roof :
13
The insulation of the roof is a first urgency in solar protection within the framework of the ECODOM
process. To put in evidence the influence of the roof, we have instrumented two identical apartments (same as
the one figure 8) but with one under roof and the another one at a lower level. In that case, when the two
apartments are closed, only the energetic contribution of the roof is responsible of the gap between the indoor
resultant temperature.
Figures 10 and 11 show respectively the insolation during the period of the instrumentation and the
evolution of the indoor resultant temperature of the two apartments. A systematic offset is observed of 1¨C to
1,5¨C between the two apartments during the whole period of measure. One finds again the same type of result
for the two campaigns of measure (“La Trinité” and “La Découverte”) : a flat under roof with a good
insulation corresponding to ECODOM has always his resultant temperature upper of 1¨C to 1,5¨C compared
to the flats which are not under roof. With a badly designed roof, distances of more of 3¨C have been
observed. This type of measure confirms the major importance of a good insulation of the roof in tropical
climate.
Fig. 10 : Solar radiation during the assessment of the solar protection of the roof
Fig. 11 : Comparison of the resultant temperature in two dwellings (one under roof and the other one at
intermediate level
Occupied period (operation “La Trinité”)
We present here the results obtained for a occupied flat of the operation « The Trinity ». The period of
instrumentation lasted two months (in March and April, 1998). The instrumented flat ihad two levels. The first
level had as two bedrooms, the kitchen and the dining room. The upper level under roof had only a third
bedroom. This flat had two infringements compared to the ECODOM specifications : the first one concerned
the insulation of roof which was only 5 cms while ECODOM asked for 10 cms (the roof was of grey colour).
The second one concerned the ventilation of the bedroom under roof : the percentage of ventilation was sharply
lower than the percentage required by ECODOM.
14
Figures 12 and 13 show the set of the temperature/humidity couples over the period of instrumentation for
a room (chamber 2) of the first level and for the room under roof (chamber 3).
We observed generally that the rooms which are not under roof and well naturally ventilated have globally
the same thermal and airflow behavior which is represented by Fig. 12. We are on average 10 % of time
outside the zone of comfort
The room (bedroom 3) under roof is very warm. The distribution of the points on the psychrometric chart is
very spread over the axis of the resulatant temperatures. Although this room is naturally ventilated and is often
used by the tenant, we are 40% of the time outside the comfort zone. It is not so the way of living that
influences the thermal behavior of the room, but rather a problem of the insufficient heat insulation.
Besides, we can suppose that the crossing ventilation of the room is apparently insufficient.
Fig. 12 : Temperature/humidity couples of an occupied flat, room at intermediate level
Fig. 13 : Temperature/humidity couples of an occupied flat, room under roof
6.3 Synthesis
Experimental and sociological results will enable to have feed back informations about ECODOM
dwellings and to supply eventual appropriated corrections to quantitative values of passive solar
specifications. Above all, experimental feed-back allow us to know if dwellings are well adapted to occupant
way of life.
We can't point out the whole points of these studies but some of the main conclusions can be indicated.
The solar protection of the roof stays one of the main point in the thermal design of buildings in
tropical climate. We were able to show some defaults of the implemented insulation in the
experimented operations leading important overheating. It is also necessary to maintain the
specifications of table 1 concerning the minimum thickness of insulation needed.
15
Natural ventilation showed itself effective in the tested flats except at night in the case of very weak
night breezes where an overheating of 1¨C was observed compared to the outside temperature. Also, the
ECODOM percentage of openings of 25 % is a minimum value below which we can not get through.
Finally, the sociological study showed that the tenants were globally satisfied with their flat
considering the thermal aspects. However the dissatisfaction resulted from the bad acoustic design of
the flats. And we touch here one of the major problems of the conception in tropical climate : the
duality of thermal and acoustic design. One the one hand, we must open the dwelling to look for
thermal comfort, on the other hand, the acoustic comfort is reached by closing the windows.
7. CONCLUSION
Methodology used for developing ECODOM standards, from simulations to experimental results, has been
presented.
This whole work led to a pedagogical reference document defining efficient passive solar cooling strategies
and specifications for each component of dwelling envelope and likewise minimal porosity ratios to optimize
natural ventilation. Dwellings to be constructed according to ECODOM standards should follow these
specifications. ECODOM actors (architects, designers, engineers, building physicists,…) now speak the same
“language” by using the reference ECODOM document.
An experimental monitoring has been set up for first ECODOM dwellings constructed in order to validate
experimentally impact of passive cooling specifications on comfort of occupants. This experimental work has
allowed a real scale feed back. Such monitoring is essential, as the ECODOM standard is the first step
towards the setting up of building codes and regulations on energy efficiency in envelope of residential
buildings
in
the
French
overseas
territories,
that
REFERENCES
16
should
be
effective
by the year
2002.
Ashley R. and Reynolds J.S. (1993). Overall and zonal efficiency end use in an energy conscious office building. Solar energy. 52,
1, 75-83.
Bansal N.K, Garg S.N., and Kothari S. (1992). Effect of Exterior Surface Color on the Thermal Performance of Buildings. Building
and Environment. 27, 31-37.
Célaire R. (1997). Opération expérimentale ECODOM, cahier de prescriptions. Document de référence.
De Waal H.B. (1993). New Recommendations for Building in Tropical Climates. Building and Environment. 28, 271-285.
Filippin C., Beascochea A., Esteves A., De Rosa C., Cortegoso L. and Estelrich D. (1998). A passive solar building for ecological
research in Argentina : The first two years experience. Solar Energy. 63, 2, 105-115.
Gandemer J., Barnaud G., Sacre C., Millet J.R. (1992). Guide sur la climatisation naturelle en climat tropical humide. Tome 1 :
Méthodologie de prise en compte des paramètres climatiques dans l’habitat et conseils pratiques. C.S.T.B., 133 p.
Garde F. (1997) Validation et développement d'un modèle thermo-aéraulique de bâtiments en climatisation passive et active.
Intégration multimodèle de systèmes. PhD Thesis, Université de La Réunion, 260 p.
Garde F., Boyer H., Gatina J.C. (1999a) Elaboration of global quality standards for natural and low energy cooling in french
tropical island buildings. Building and Environment. 34, 71-83.
Garde F., Boyer H. and Celaire R. (1999b) Building Design in Tropical Climates. Elaboration of the ECODOM standard in the
french overseas “departements”. In Proceedings of ISES Solar Word Congress, 4-11 July, Jerusalem, Israel.
Garg N.K. (1991). Passive solar options for thermal comfort in building enveloppes – An assessment. Solar energy. 47, 6, 437441.
Hassif S. (1986). A linear model for passive solar evaluation. Solar Energy. 37, 2, 165-174.
Malama A. and Sharples S. (1996). Thermal and Economic Implications of Passive Cooling Strategies in Low-Cost Housing in
Tropical Upland Climates. Architectural Science Review. 39, 95-105.
Millet J.R. (1988). Conception thermique des bâtiments en climatisation naturelle dans les D.O.M. Document d’application.
C.S.T.B n° 88.4343, 124 p.
Peuportier B. and Michel J. (1995). Comparative analysis of active and passive solar heating systems with transparent insulation.
Solar Energy. 54, 1, 13-18.
Rousseau P.G. and Mathews E.H. (1996). A new integrated design tool for naturally ventilated buildings. Energy and buildings.
23, 231-236.
17
1994
1995
1996
1997-99
Identification of the energetic, climatic and social contexts
Setting up of a network between the ECODOM partners (ministry of housing, architects,
the french autority for environment and energy conservation, energy consultants, the
university of Reunion island, low cost housing companies, public utilities…)
Choice of typical dwellings and of a typical day for running the simulations
Simulations on typical dwellings with the thermal and airflow software CODYRUN
Definition of the performant passive cooling solutions.
Edition of the ECODOM reference document after numerous in and outs among the different
partners for taking into account the pedagogical aspects of the document.
Search for the first ECODOM projects. Communication.
300 ECODOM dwellings built in the DOM. 5 experimental ECODOM operations. (2 in
Guadeloupe and 3 in La Réunion)
Experimental and social follow up.
Consulting and research of new projects.
2000
Experimental feed back and modification of the reference document.
2002
Setting up of building codes and regulations on energy efficiency in envelope of residential
buildings in the French overseas territories.
Fig. 1 : The ECODOM process
Fig. 2 : Typical dwelling
a
h
d
d
h
Fig. 3 : Some of the shading devices required by ECODOM
SO2
FACADE 2
Si2
Si1
SO1
FACADE 1
Fig. 4 : Cross ventilated dwelling
North
Fig. 5 : ECODOM “La Découverte” - The original project (1996)
2. Solar protection of
the roof :
(increase of the
insulation at 8 cm)
3. Solar protection of
walls and windows :
balconies added on the
northern facade
3. Insulation
of Est and
West sides
4. Natural ventilation :
increase in the porosity of
the bedrooms windows
Fig. 6 : Modifications of the original project (1997)
Fig. 7 : Floor plan of an ECODOM dwelling. Increase in porosity of bedrooms (glazed windows ) and solar protection
of northern facade (balconies).
Fig. 8 : The final project (april 1999)
Fig. 9 : Measurements of ambient air and resultant temperature inside dwelling
Horizontal solar radiation
(W/m²)
1000
Direct solar radiation
Diffuse solar radiation
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
01/01
02/01
03/01
04/01
05/01
06/01
07/01
Fig. 10 : Solar radiation during the assessment of the solar protection of the roof
Resulatnt temperature
(°C)
Constant temperature gap
Room under roof
Room at intermediate stair
33
32
31
30
29
01/01
02/01
03/01
04/01
05/01
06/01
07/01
Fig. 11 : Comparison of the resultant temperature in two dwellings (one under roof and the other one at
intermediate level
10
5
0
40
35
30
15
25
20
F15ch2
25
20
15
10
5
0
15
20
25
30
35
40
Fig. 12 : Temperature/humidity couples of an occupied flat, room at intermediate level
F15ch3
25
20
15
10
5
0
15
20
25
30
35
40
Fig. 13 : Temperature/humidity couples of an occupied flat, room under roof
Table 1 : Roof solar protection
Insulated simple roofs
Roof colour
light ( = 0.4)
medium (=0.6)
dark ( = 0.8)
Roofs with well-ventilated attics
Polystyrene type insulation
= 0.041 W/m.K
5 cm
8 cm
10 cm
Polyurethane type insulation
= 0.029 W/m.K
4 cm
6 cm
8 cm
Polystyrene type insulation
Polyurethane type insulation
= 0.041 W/m.K
= 0.029 W/m.K
No insulation needed
2 cm
0 cm
Roof colour
light ( = 0.4)
medium or dark (=0.6)
Table 2 : Overhang - minimum d/h ratio values to be respected.
Type of wall
Poured concrete 15cm (R=0.1 m².K/W)
hollow concrete blocks (R=0.2 m².K/W)
wood (R=0.5 m².K/W)
light colour
medium colour
East Sout West Nort East Sout West Nort
h
h
h
h
0.4
0.2
0.7
0.5
1
0.5
1.3
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.3
0.8
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0.1
d
h
Table 3
Insulation of walls (in cm) for different orientations and external colours (for a conductivity of 0.041
W/m.K)
light colour
East Sout west
h
concrete 20cm (R=0.1 m².K/W)
1
1
1
hollow concrete blocks (R=0.2 m².K/W)
1
1
1
wood (R=0.5 m².K/W)
0
0
0
Type of wall
Table 4
Values of d/(2a+h) (case 1), or d/h (case 2)
Orientation of windows
East South West North
Reunion Island
0.8
0.3
1
0.6
Table 5 : Technical characteristics - solar water heaters
Solar water heaters
minimum collector area to be installed for
various types of dwellings
F1-F2 (2 rooms)
1.5 m²
F3 (3 rooms)
2.0 m²
F4 (4 rooms)
2.5 m²
F5 (5 rooms)
3.0 m²
F6 and more
3.5 m²
Nort
h
1
1
0
medium colour
East Sout West North
h
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
0
0
1
1
Table 6 : Experimental schedule for non occupied and occupied periods
« La Découverte »
« La Trinité »
Non-occupied
period
From january to
april, 1999
From january to
may,1998
Occupied period
No measurement
From march to
april, 1998
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1510.02993v2 [math.AC] 3 Oct 2017
RATIONAL SINGULARITIES AND UNIFORM SYMBOLIC
TOPOLOGIES
ROBERT M. WALKER
Abstract. Take (R, m) any normal Noetherian domain, either local
or N-graded over a field. We study the question of when R satisfies
the uniform symbolic topology property (USTP) of Huneke, Katz, and
Validashti: namely, that there exists an integer D > 0 such that for all
prime ideals P ⊆ R, the symbolic power P (Da) ⊆ P a for all a > 0.
Reinterpreting results of Lipman, we deduce that when R is a twodimensional rational singularity, then it satisfies the USTP. Emphasizing
the non-regular setting, we produce explicit, effective multipliers D,
working in two classes of surface singularities in equal characteristic over
an algebraically closed field, using: (1) the volume of a parallelogram
in R2 when R is the coordinate ring of a simplicial toric surface; or (2)
known invariants of du Val isolated singularities in characteristic zero
due to Lipman.
1. Introduction and Conventions for the Paper
Given a Noetherian commutative ring R, an important open problem is
discerning when there is an integer D = D(R) > 0, depending on R, such
that the symbolic power P (Da) ⊆ P a for all prime ideals P ⊆ R and all
integers a > 0. When such a D exists, one says that R satisfies the uniform
symbolic topology property (USTP) on prime ideals [13]. There are
several simple cases where D = 1 will suffice, that is, where symbolic powers
and ordinary powers coincide for all prime ideals. Namely D = 1 works if R
is: (a) Artinian; or (b) a one-dimensional domain; or (c) a two-dimensional
UFD (Cl(R) = 0 in Lemma (1.1) below). In particular, D = 1 works for any
regular local ring of dimension at most two.
The Ein-Lazarsfeld-Smith Theorem [3, 9], as extended by Hochster and
Huneke, says that if R is a d-dimensional regular ring containing a field, then
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 13H10. Secondary 14C20, 14M25
Keywords: symbolic powers, divisor class group, rational singularity, toric variety.
I wish to thank my thesis adviser, Karen E. Smith, for several hours of fruitful, encouraging conversation. I also thank Daniel Hernández, Felipe Pérez, and Luis Núñez-Betancourt
for each critiquing a draft of the paper. I thank the anonymous referee for suggestions improving the exposition. I was supported by a NSF GRF under Grant Number PGF-031543,
and this work was partially supported by the NSF RTG grant 0943832.
1
2
ROBERT M. WALKER
P (da) ⊆ P a for all prime ideals P ⊆ R and all integers a > 0; the papers
[10, 14, 17] extend what is known for regular rings containing a field. In stark
contrast, effective uniform bounds are harder to unearth in the non-regular
setting. In this direction, Huneke, Katz, and Validashti [12, Cor 3.10] give
a non-constructive proof, under mild hypotheses on the ground field, that a
uniform D exists when R is a reduced isolated singularity containing a field.
As far as the author knows, no constructive (or even sharp) bounds D were
known prior to cases covered in this paper.
The following is a simple main case of the key lemma we use to produce
effective bounds:
Lemma 1.1. Let R be a Noetherian normal domain whose global divisor class
group Cl(R) := Cl(Spec(R)) is finite abelian of order D. Then for all ideals
q ⊆ R of pure height one, the symbolic power q(Da) ⊆ qa for all a > 0.
Lemma 1.1 supports Huneke’s philosophy in [11] that there are uniform bounds
lurking in Noetherian rings. In particular, when R in Lemma 1.1 has Krull
dimension two, it satisfies the uniform symbolic topology property on prime
ideals, since height one primes are the only nontrivial class to check. Notice
that the R in Lemma 1.1 is allowed to be of mixed characteristic, unlike
all previous results which require the ring to contain a field.
It remains to identify classes of rings that satisfy the hypotheses of Lemma
1.1. In dimension two, we use the following result due to Lipman:
Theorem 1 (Lipman [15, Prop 17.1]). Let (R, m) be a normal Noetherian
local domain of dimension two. If R has a rational singularity, then Cl(R) is
finite.
Lipman defines a two-dimensional, normal Noetherian local domain (R, m)
to have rational singularities if there is a proper, birational map f : X →
Spec(R) from a regular scheme X such that H 1 (X, OX ) = 0. This allows
us to affirmatively answer a question of Huneke, Katz, and Validashti [13,
Question 1.1] for rationally singular surfaces:
Theorem 1.2. All two-dimensional rational singularities (R, m) satisfy the
uniform symbolic topology property on primes.
In what other cases can we find effective values of D? In subsection 3.2, we
will use results of Lipman to identify explicit effective values D for du Val
singularities over C; see Table 3.3. Interestingly, our sharp results show that
the smallest D that works for a class of non-regular rings can be arbitrarily
large, even if the Krull dimension and multiplicity of the singularity are fixed.
To produce effective bounds in higher dimension, we turn to the class of
normal toric rings containing an arbitrary algebraically closed field k. These
rings are built from a convex-geometric starter: precisely, a polyhedral cone
σ ⊆ Rn generated by a finite set of primitive lattice points vi ∈ Zn , each
RATIONAL SINGULARITIES AND UNIFORM SYMBOLIC TOPOLOGIES
3
having coordinates whose gcd is one. It turns out that a toric ring has
finite class group precisely when it is simplicial, that is, the vi are R-linearly
independent [2, Prop 4.2.2+Prop 4.2.7]. In particular, we have a
Theorem 1.3. Let σ ⊆ Rn be a full-dimensional simplicial strongly convex
rational polyhedral cone, and let R = k[σ ∨ ∩ Zn ] be the corresponding toric
ring over an algebraically closed field k. Then R satisfies the uniform symbolic
topology property on ideals of pure height one with multiplier D, where D is
the volume of the n-parallelotope spanned by the primitive generators of σ.
In particular, this volume can be computed as the determinant of a positivedefinite integer matrix. See subsection 3.1 for details.
Conventions: All our rings are commutative with identity. From subsection 2.1 onwards, and except when stated otherwise, all our rings R will be
Noetherian normal domains, and k will denote an algebraically closed field.
All our algebraic varieties
L over k are irreducible. When we say R is graded,
we mean that R =
d≥0 Rd is graded by N, with R0 being a field, and
L
m = d>0 Rd the unique homogeneous maximal ideal.
2. Local Uniform Annihilation and Symbolic Powers
Defining Symbolic Powers. If P is a prime ideal in a nonzero Noetherian
ring R, its a-th (a ∈ Z>0 ) symbolic power
P (a) := P a RP ∩ R
is the unique P -primary component in any minimal primary decomposition
of P a . More generally, if I is any proper ideal of R, its a-th symbolic power is
[
I (a) := I a W −1 R ∩ R, where W = R − {P : P ∈ AssR (R/I)}.
While I a ⊆ I (a) for all a, the converse can fail for a > 1: I (1) = I since W is
the set of nonzerodivisors modulo I.
2.1. Uniform Annihilation and Class Groups. Given a normal Noetherian domain R, the divisor class group Cl(R) = Cl(Spec(R)) of R is the free
abelian group on the set of height one prime ideals of R modulo relations
a1 P1 + . . . + ar Pr = 0,
(a )
(a )
P1 1 ∩ . . . ∩ Pr r
is principal (see Hochster’s lecture notes
whenever the ideal
[8] for more details on this definition; see also Hartshorne’s presentation [5,
Ch.II,§6]). It is well known that the class group Cl(R) is trivial if and only
if R is a UFD [5, Ch.II,§6]. Both conditions mean that every height one
prime ideal in R is principal. We now show this latter assertion is equivalent
to saying that all symbolic powers of a height one prime ideal P ⊆ R are
principal, so P (a) = P a for all a > 0, and all height one primes P in a UFD.
We follow an anonymous referee’s advice to state a
4
ROBERT M. WALKER
Lemma 2.1. If R is an arbitrary Noetherian ring, and P = (f ) is prime with
f a nonzerodivisor, then P (a) = (f a ) for all a > 0.
Proof. Induce on a with base case a = 1. Assuming the statement for some
a ≥ 1, take x ∈ P (a+1) . Since x ∈ P (a+1) ⊆ P (a) = (f a ), x = f a y for some
y. By the choice of x, there is s 6∈ P with sx = sf a y ∈ P a+1 = (f a+1 ). Since
f is a nonzerodivisor, sy ∈ (f ) = P , which is prime. Therefore, y ∈ P = (f ),
and x ∈ (f a+1 ).
Given a Noetherian reduced ring R, recall that the affine scheme X =
Spec(R) is locally factorial if Rp is a UFD for all prime ideals p ⊆ R; or
equivalently, if Cl(Rp ) = 0 for all primes p ⊆ R.
Definition 2.2. A reduced Noetherian normal ring R is (locally) uniformly
annihilated if there exists an integer (multiplier) D > 0 such that one, and
hence all, of the following equivalent conditions will hold:
(1) D · Cl(Rp ) = 0 for all prime ideals p ⊆ R. More precisely, P (D) Rp =
(P Rp )(D) is principal for all height one primes P ⊆ p.
(2) The annihilator ideal AnnZ (Cl(Rp )) ⊇ DZ for all prime ideals p ⊆ R.
(3) D · Cl(Rm ) = 0 for all maximal ideals m ⊆ R.
Notice that (3) implies (1) since principal ideals remain principal when we
extend along the ring map Rm → Rp . Note that since one can take D = 1 at
locally factorial points of Spec(R), it suffices to compute D at maximal ideals
m ⊆ R such that Rm is not a UFD. In language more familiar to algebraic
geometers, D annihilates the local class group Clloc (X) = Cl(X)/ Pic(X) of
X = Spec(R).
Remark 2.3. A Noetherian normal domain R is uniformly annihilated when
the annihilator ideal AnnZ (Cl(R)) 6= 0 (e.g., if Cl(R) is finite). However,
the smallest local uniform multiplier need √
not annihilate Cl(R) globally. For
example, if the Dedekind domain R = Z[ −5], then Cl(R) ∼
= Z/2Z, while
any Dedekind domain R is locally factorial, so Cl(R)/ Pic(R) is trivial in the
language of algebraic geometry, and D = 1 is the optimal multiplier.
Remark 2.4. If R is local, then the smallest uniform multiplier would generate
AnnZ (Cl(R)). When R is N-graded over a field with unique graded maximal
ideal m, Cl(R) ∼
= Cl(Rm ) [16, Lem 5.1] and we again consider a generator
of AnnZ (Cl(R)). In each case, this optimal multiplier D is the class group’s
order if and only if the group is finite cyclic; we fill in Table 3.3’s final column
via this fact.
2.2. The Main Lemma. Symbolic powers are notoriously difficult to compute by hand, i.e., to give generators for. Working in height one, item (a) of
the following proposition allows us to study them indirectly. Note that if I is
a proper ideal in a Noetherian ring, we say that I has pure height h if all of
its associated primes have height h, in particular, none are embedded.
RATIONAL SINGULARITIES AND UNIFORM SYMBOLIC TOPOLOGIES
5
Proposition 2.5. Let R be a Noetherian normal domain, and q any ideal of
pure height one with associated primes P1 , . . . , Pr . Then:
(a) There exist positive integers b1 , . . . , br , uniquely determined by q, such
(Eb )
(Eb )
that the symbolic power q(E) = P1 1 ∩ . . . ∩ Pr r for all E > 0.
(D)
(b) If either (1) D · Cl(R) = 0, or simply (2) q
is principal, then for
all integers a > 0, q(Da) = (q(D) )a is principal and q(Da) ⊆ qa .
Proof. First, we prove (a). For each i, the local ring Si = RPi is a discrete
valuation ring, and we let ti ∈ Si be a local uniformizing parameter. Then
Si is a PID, so an ideal J ⊆ Si is Pi Si = (ti )Si -primary if and only if J =
(Pi Si )n = Pin Si = (tni )Si for some n > 0. In particular, qSi is Pi Si -primary,
(b )
say qSi = (tbi i )Si . Then the Pi -primary component of q is Pi i . Thus q =
(b1 )
(br )
P1 ∩ . . . ∩ Pr
and clearly the bi are uniquely determined by q. Similarly,
(Eb )
(Eb )
i
)S
for
E > 0, so q(E) = P1 1 ∩ . . . ∩ Pr r for all E > 0.
qE Si = (tEb
i
i
(b )
(b )
For (b), first note that (1) implies (2): indeed, since q = P1 1 ∩ · · · ∩ Pr r ,
it yields an element [q] := b1 [P1 ] + · · · + br [Pr ] ∈ Cl(R), and since 0 = D[q] =
[q(D) ] ∈ Cl(R), we conclude that q(D) is principal. So we proceed assuming
q(D) is principal. Since q(D) ⊆ q(1) = q, by taking a-th powers, part (b) follows
in full once we explain how q(Da) = (q(D) )a for all integers a > 0. Indeed,
using the notation in the proof of (a), q(Da) Si = (q(D) )a Si = (tDabi )Si for all
i, and we simply contract back to R.
We now prove the main lemma of the paper, expanding on Lemma 1.1:
Lemma 2.6. Let R be a reduced Noetherian normal ring. Suppose D annihilates Cl(Rm ) for all maximal ideals m in R. Then for all a > 0 and all ideals
q ⊆ R of pure height one, the symbolic power q(Da) ⊆ qa .
Proof. First, we reduce to the local case. Indeed, recall that given two ideals
I, J in R, the inclusion I ⊆ J holds (that is, the R-module J+I
J = 0) if and
(J+I)Rm
JRm +IRm
only if IRm ⊆ JRm (that is, the Rm -module JRm =
= 0) for
JRm
all maximal ideals m ⊆ R. So we may assume R is a normal Noetherian local
domain (in keeping with R being uniformly annihilated). Then, for R, D, and
all q as stated, Proposition 2.5(b) gives us the inclusions.
3. Effective Uniform Bounds
We begin with a selective review of toric geometry. For more details (e.g.,
omitted definitions, proofs, and relevant exercises) we refer the reader to:
Chapters 1,3,4 of Cox, Little, and Schenck [2]; or alternatively, Chapters 1
and 3 of Fulton [4].1 For simplicity, we work with the standard lattice Zn in
Rn , and a fixed algebraically closed field k.
1While both references work over C, the facts we review in this paper hold over any
algebraically closed field.
6
ROBERT M. WALKER
Any normal affine toric n-fold can be obtained from a strongly convex,
rational polyhedral cone σ in Rn , that is, a closed, convex set
(
)
X
σ = Cone(G) =
av · v : each av ∈ R≥0 ⊆ Rn ,
v∈G
containing no line through the origin (strong convexity) and generated by a
(possibly empty) finite set G of nonzero vectors in Zn (rationality). The cone
has dimension dim σ := dim(R-linear span of G) ≤ n; if dim σ = n, then σ
is called full. For such a cone σ = Cone(G) ⊆ Rn , the dual
σ ∨ := {w ∈ Rn : hw, vi ≥ 0 for all v ∈ G}
(h·, ·i is dot product in Rn )
is rational polyhedral and full, from which we obtain
(1) A finitely-generated semigroup under addition
)
( r
X
∨
n
ai mi : each ai ∈ Z≥0
(Sσ , +) := σ ∩ Z =
i=1
for some finite list of generators m1 , . . . , mr ∈ σ ∨ ∩ Zn .
(2) A normal domain of finite type over k: namely, the semigroup ring
R = k[Sσ ] generated as a k-vector space by the characters χm with
m ∈ Sσ . Note that k[Sσ ] is generated as a k-algebra by characters
χm1 , . . . , χmr where the mi are the semigroup generators of Sσ in (1).
Any domain so obtained is a (normal) toric ring (or normal affine
semigroup algebra, by definition) over k.
(3) A normal toric n-fold, Uσ = Spec(k[Sσ ]).
The cone σ ⊆ Rn as above is simplicial if σ = {0} or σ = Cone(G) for
some G ⊆ Zn forming part of a R-basis for Rn , and we call the corresponding
toric ring and toric variety simplicial. When σ 6= {0}, we may assume
G = {v1 , . . . , vdim(σ) } consists of primitive vectors, i.e., that the coordinates
of each vi have no common prime integer factor. When σ is full, we index
the vi so the matrix AG ∈ Matn×n (Z) whose i-th row is vi has determinant
d = det(AG ) ∈ Z>0 , the volume of the n-parallelotope spanned by v1 , . . . , vn .
Working over an algebraically closed field k, each ray ρ ∈ Σ(1), the collection of rays (one-dimensional faces) of σ, has a generator uρ ∈ ρ ∩ Zn that is
primitive, and yields a torus-invariant prime divisor Dρ on X = Uσ , per the
Orbit-Cone Correspondence [2, Thm 3.2.6]. The torus-invariant Weil divisors
on X form a free abelian group [2, Exercise 4.1.1]
M
ZDρ .
DivT (X) =
ρ∈Σ(1)
We close by recording without proof a few facts from sections 4.1 and 4.2 of
[2] about the divisor class group Cl(X), specialized to the affine case.
Theorem 3.1. Take a normal affine toric variety X = Uσ . Then
RATIONAL SINGULARITIES AND UNIFORM SYMBOLIC TOPOLOGIES
7
(1) Cl(X) is finite abelian if and only if σ is simplicial (cf., [2, Prop 4.2.2
and Prop 4.2.7]). If so, then all Weil divisors on X are Q-Cartier of
index bounded by the order of Cl(X).
(2) If G = {uρ : ρ ∈ Σ(1)} spans Rn , i.e., σ is full, then we have a short
exact sequence of abelian groups
(3.1)
φ
0 → Zn → DivT (X) → Cl(X) → 0,
P
where φ(m) = div(χm ) = ρ∈Σ(1) hm, uρ iDρ , and h·, ·i is dot product.
3.1. The Toric Case. The short exact sequence 3.1 makes it easy to compute
the divisor class group Cl(Uσ ). If Σ(1) = {ρ1 , . . . , ρr } has r elements,2 the
map φ can be treated, up to isomorphism, as a map Zn → Zr given by the
matrix A = (uρ1 , . . . , uρr )T where T denotes transpose: that is, the i-th row
of A is given by the coordinates of uρi . Cl(Uσ ) is the cokernel of φ, and hence
can be computed up to isomorphism by first finding the Smith normal form
of A. Note that since the alternating sum of the ranks in the short exact
sequence vanishes, Cl(Uσ ) has rank r − n. We now re-express Theorem 1.3:
Corollary 3.2. Let σ = Cone(G) ⊆ Rn be a simplicial full strongly convex
rational polyhedral cone. Let Uσ be the corresponding affine toric variety. Let
AG ∈ Matn×n (Z) be the accompanying matrix of primitive ray generators.
Then Cl(Uσ ) is a finite abelian group of order d = | det(AG )|.
Proof. We maintain the notational conventions of the statement of Theorem
3.1, along with those in the paragraph on simplicial toric varieties in our
review above. By hypothesis, G = {uρ : ρ ∈ Σ(1)} forms an R-vector space
basis of Rn since σ is simplicial. So by Theorem 3.1(2), Cl(Uσ ) has rank zero,
and hence is finite abelian. Moreover, as a special case of following the Smith
normal form approach in the paragraph above, we see that the matrix AG
defines the action of φ. Thus we conclude that d is the order of Cl(Uσ ).
3.2. Rational double points. To obtain additional explicit, effective multipliers, we turn to the case of complete, normal Noetherian local domains
S in equal characteristic zero with du Val (ADE) isolated singularity and algebraically closed residue field; for simplicity, we work with C. In [15, §24],
Lipman computes the class group isomorphism type (as a Z-module) of each
du Val singularity. The du Val (ADE) singularities, also known as rational
double points, are the most basic isolated surface singularities. For a brief introduction to these singularities and their basic properties, we refer the reader
to sections III.3 and III.7 of [1]. Their minimal resolutions can be understood
and classified by the simply-laced Dynkin diagrams of types A, D, and E. We
can express S as above as the quotient of the power series C[[x, y, z]] by a
single local equation. We now situate a succinct data table, where the last
column’s entries are the optimal uniform multipliers from Remark 2.4:
2Note that r ≥ n since G spans Rn by hypothesis in Theorem 3.1(2).
8
ROBERT M. WALKER
Table 3.3.
du Val Singularity
type
An (n ≥ 1)
Local Equation
xz − y n+1
Dn (n ≥ 4)
x2 + yz 2 − z n−1
En (n = 6, 7, 8)
4
3
2
x + y + z
3
3
x y + y + z2
5
x + y3 + z 2
if n = 6
if n = 7
if n = 8
Class group
(isomorphism type)
( Z/(n + 1)Z
(Z/2Z)2 n even
Z/4Z
n odd.
Z/3Z
if
n=6
Z/2Z if n = 7
0
if n = 8
Dmin (S)
( n+1
2 n even
4 n odd.
3
if n = 6
2 if n = 7
1 if n = 8
Note that an analogous data table can be drafted for affine du Val singularity hypersurfaces in C3 (affine, N-graded case), which arise as the quotients
C2 /G by the action of a finite subgroup G ⊆ SU2 (C).
Taking the above data table in tandem with Theorem 1.3, we now have
access to an infinite supply of concrete, effective uniform bounds that hold
in non-regular Noetherian domains whose singularities are sufficiently nice
(e.g., toric, du Val). In particular, the Huneke-Katz-Validashti result [12]
on uniform bounds now has some added company in the setting of rational
surface singularities, courtesy of Lipman’s work.
Remark 3.4. When a Noetherian ring R satisfies the uniform symbolic topology property (USTP) on prime ideals, experts might initially expect that the
optimal multiplier D = Dmin (R) should depend only on simple numerical invariants of R, such as Krull dimension, or the multiplicity of R at an isolated
singularity. However, An -singularities and E8 -singularities have multiplicity
two, being rational double points. At one extreme, Dmin (An ) = n + 1 is
optimal, grows arbitrarily large with n, and does not depend on any such
numerical invariants of An . At the other extreme, Dmin (E8 ) = 1 is lower than
both the Krull dimension and the multiplicity. Therefore, a (sharp) uniform
bound depending only on such numerical invariants need not exist.
4. Lingering Questions and Future Directions
To summarize, we have deduced a group-theoretic criterion (Lemma 2.6)
for uniform symbolic topologies on ideals of pure height one in a Noetherian normal domain. We also demonstrated the criterion’s utility relative to
familiar classes of local- or graded Cohen-Macaulay domains with rational
singularities [6, 7]. We close with two natural lines for further investigation.
(1) Can Lemma 2.6 be strengthened to cover all (non-prime) ideals of
height one?
(2) Can we identify a candidate mechanism (e.g., group-theoretic) to verify the uniform symbolic topology property for: prime ideals of height
one in non-simplicial toric rings; or prime ideals of height two or more,
even in the case of simplicial toric rings of dimension at least three?
RATIONAL SINGULARITIES AND UNIFORM SYMBOLIC TOPOLOGIES
9
References
[1] W.P. Barth, K. Hulek, C.A.M. Peters, A. Van de Ven, Compact Complex Surfaces,
second edition. Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2004.
[2] D.A. Cox, J.B Little, and H.K. Schenck. Toric Varieties (2011), Graduate Studies in
Mathematics 124. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
[3] L. Ein, R. Lazarsfeld, and K. Smith. Uniform bounds and symbolic powers on smooth
varieties. Invent. Math. 144 (2001), pp. 241-252.
[4] W. Fulton. Introduction to Toric Varieties (1993), Annals of Math. Studies 131. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
[5] R. Hartshorne. Algebraic Geometry. Graduate Texts in Math. 52, Springer-Verlag, New
York, 1977.
[6] M. Hochster. Cohen-Macaulay Rings and Modules. Proceedings of the International
Congress of Mathematicians, Helsinki, Finland, V. I, Academia Scientiarum Fennica,
1980, pp. 291-298.
[7] M. Hochster. Rings of invariants of tori, Cohen-Macaulay rings generated by monomials, and polytopes. Ann. of Math (2) 96 (1972), pp. 318-337.
[8] M. Hochster. Math 615 Winter 2007 Lecture 4/6/07. Online link.
[9] M. Hochster and C. Huneke. Comparison of ordinary and symbolic powers of ideals.
Invent. Math. 147 (2002), pp. 349-369.
[10] M. Hochster and C. Huneke. Fine behavior of symbolic powers of ideals. Illinois J.
Math. 51 (2007), no. 1, pp. 171–183.
[11] C. Huneke. Uniform bounds in Noetherian rings. Invent. Math. 107 (1992), pp. 203223.
[12] C. Huneke, D. Katz, and J. Validashti. Uniform equivalence of symbolic and adic
topologies. Illinois J. Math. 53 (2009), no. 1, pp. 325–338.
[13] C. Huneke, D. Katz, and J. Validashti. Uniform symbolic topologies and finite extensions. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219 (2015), no. 3, pp. 543–550.
[14] M.R. Johnson. Containing symbolic powers in regular rings. Comm. in Algebra Vol.
42 (2014), no. 8, pp. 3552–3557.
[15] J. Lipman. Rational singularities, with applications to algebraic surfaces and unique
factorization. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. (1969), no. 36, pp. 195–279.
[16] M.P. Murthy. Vector bundles over affine surfaces birationally equivalent to a ruled
surface. Ann. of Math (2) 89 (1969), pp. 242-253.
[17] S. Takagi, and K. Yoshida. Generalized test ideals and symbolic powers. Michigan
Math. J. 57 (2008), pp. 711–725.
Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Underapproximation of Procedure Summaries
for Integer Programs
Pierre Ganty1 , Radu Iosif2 , and Filip Konečný2,3
arXiv:1210.4289v3 [cs.PL] 24 Oct 2016
1
Imdea Software Institute, Madrid, Spain
2
Verimag/CNRS, Grenoble, France
3
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland
Abstract
We show how to underapproximate the procedure summaries of recursive programs over the integers using off-the-shelf analyzers for nonrecursive programs. The novelty of our approach is that the non-recursive
program we compute may capture unboundedly many behaviors of the original recursive program for which stack usage cannot be bounded. Moreover,
we identify a class of recursive programs on which our method terminates
and returns the precise summary relations without underapproximation.
Doing so, we generalize a similar result for non-recursive programs to the recursive case. Finally, we present experimental results of an implementation
of our method applied on a number of examples.
1
Introduction
Formal approaches to reasoning about behaviors of programs usually fall into one
of the following two categories: certification approaches, that provide proofs of
correctness, and bug-finding approaches, that explore increasingly larger sets of
traces in order to find possible errors. While the methods in the first category are
used typically in the development of safety-critical software whose failures may
incur dramatic losses in terms of human lives (airplanes, space missions, or nuclear
power plants), the methods in the second category have a broad application in
industry, outside of the safety-critical market niche. Another difference between
the two categories is methodological: certification approaches are based on
over-approximations of the set of behaviors (if the over-approximation is free
of errors, the original system is correct), while bug-finding needs systematic
under-approximation techniques (if there are errors, the method will eventually
discover all of them). Finally, over-approximation methods are guaranteed to
terminate, but the answer might be inconclusive (spurious errors are introduced
due to the abstraction), whereas under-approximation methods provide precise
results (all reported errors are real), but with no guarantee for termination.
Procedure summaries are relations between the input and return values of a
procedure, resulting from its terminating executions. Computing summaries is
important, as they are a key enabler for the development of modular verification
techniques for inter-procedural programs, such as checking safety, termination
1
or equivalence properties. Summary computation is, however, challenging in the
presence of recursive procedures with integer parameters, return values, and local
variables. While many analysis tools exist for non-recursive programs, only a
few ones address the problem of recursion (e.g. InterProc [19]).
In this paper, we propose a novel technique to generate arbitrarily precise
underapproximations of summary relations. Our technique is based on the
following idea. The control flow of procedural programs is captured precisely
by the language of a context-free grammar. A k-index underapproximation of
this language (where k ě 1) is obtained by filtering out those derivations of
the grammar that exceed a budget, called index, on the number (at most k) of
occurrences of nonterminals occurring at each derivation step. As expected, the
higher the index, the more complete the coverage of the underapproximation.
From there we define the k-index summary relations of a program by considering
the k-index underapproximation of its control flow. Our method then reduces
the computation of k-index summary relations for a recursive program to the
computation of summary relations for a non-recursive program, which is, in
general, easier to compute because of the absence of recursion. The reduction
was inspired by a decidability proof [4] in the context of Petri nets.
The contributions of this paper are threefold. First, we show that, for a given
index, recursive programs can be analyzed using off-the-shelf analyzers designed
for non-recursive programs. Second, we identify a class of recursive programs,
with possibly unbounded stack usage, on which our technique is complete, i.e. it
terminates and returns the precise result. Third, we present experimental results
of an implementation of our method applied on a number of examples.
Motivating Example To properly introduce the reader to our result, we
describe our source-to-source program transformation through an illustrative
example. Consider the recursive program P “ tP u, consisting of a single
recursive procedure P , given in Fig. 1 (a), whose control flow graph is given
in Fig. 1 (b). The nodes of this graph represent control locations in the
program, with a designated initial location Qinit
and a final location ε. The
1
edges are labeled with relations denoting the program semantics, where primed
variables x1 and z 1 denote the values at the next step. For instance, the edge
z 1 “P px´1q^x1 “x
t2 : Q2 ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÑ Q3 corresponds to the recursive call on line 3 in the
program—the edge labels of the control flow graph explicitly mention the copies
of variables not changed by the program action corresponding to the edge, e.g.
x1 “ x.
In this paper, we model programs using visibly pushdown grammars (VPG)
[3]. The VPG for P is given in Fig. 1 (c). The role of the grammar is to define
the set of interprocedurally valid paths in the control-flow graph of the program
P . Every edge in the control-flow graph matches one or two symbols from the
finite alphabet tτ1 , x τ2 , τ2 y , τ3 , τ4 u, where x τ2 and τ2 y denote the call and return,
respectively. Each edge in the graph translates to a production rule in the
grammar, labeled pb1 , pc2 , pa3 and pa4 —the superscript a, b and c distinguishes rules
with 0, 1 and 2 nonterminals on the right-hand side, respectively. For instance,
the call edge t2 becomes the rule Q2 Ñ x τ2 Qinit
1 τ2 y Q3 . The language of the
n
n
grammar of Fig. 1 (c) (with axiom Qinit
1 ) is the set tpτ1 x τ2 q τ4 pτ2 y τ3 q | n P Nu
of interprocedurally valid paths, where each call symbol x τ2 is matched by a
return symbol τ2 y , and the matching relation is well-parenthesized.
The outcome of the program transformation applied to P is the non-recursive
2
(K
program Q “ query i i“0 , depicted in Fig. 1 (d), where K is a parameter of our
analysis. The main idea is that the executions of the procedure query k , ending
with an empty stack, correspond to the derivations of the VPG in Fig. 1 (c), of
index at most k—since there is no derivation of index 0, the set of executions
of query 0 will be empty. The body of a procedure query k consists of a main
loop, starting at the control label begin_loop in Fig. 1 (d). Each branch inside
the main loop corresponds to the simulation of one of the production rules of
the grammar in Fig. 1 (c) and starts with a control label which is the name
of that rule (pb1 , pc2 , pa3 , pa4 ). Next, we explain the relations labeling the control
edges of query k . For each production rule p in the grammar we have a relation
ρp pxI , zI , xO , zO q, where subscript I and O denote the input and output copies
of the program variables of P , respectively. In addition, we consider auxiliary
copies xJ , zJ , xK , zK and xL , zL , defined in a similar way. For instance, the
auxiliary variables store intermediate results of the computation of pc2 as follows:
rxI , zI s x τ2 rxJ , zJ s Qinit
rxK , zK s τ2 y rxL , zL s Q3 rxO , zO s. The transition
1
pc2 Ñ in_order{out_of _order can be understood by noticing that x τ2 gives
rise to the constraint xJ “ xI ´ 1, τ2 y to zL “ zK and xI “ xL corresponds to
the frame condition x1 “ x.
The peculiarity of the resulting program is that a function call is modeled
in two possible ways: (i) in-order execution of the function body, followed by
the continuation of the call, and (ii) out-of-order execution of the continuation,
followed by the execution of the function body. The two cases correspond
˚
to k-index derivations of the VPG in Fig 1 (c) of the form uQinit
1 vQ3 w ñ
˚
init
˚
˚
uv1 vQ3 w ñ uv1 vv2 w and uQ1 vv2 w ñ uv1 vv2 w ñ uv1 vv2 w, respectively,
where Qinit
ñ˚ v1 and Q3 ñ˚ v2 are derivations of the VPG. In the first case,
1
the control path simulating the derivation in query k follows the left branch
in_order{out_of _order Ñ begin_loop, whereas the second case is simulated
by the right branch.
Since the only call of query k is to query k´1 , on the edges in_order{out_of _order Ñ
begin_loop, the whole program is a non-recursive under-approximation of the
semantics of the original program P , amenable to analysis using intra-procedural
program analysis tools. Indeed, the computation of the pre-condition relation of
the program Q “ tquery 2 , query 1 , query 0 u with the Flata tool [17] yields the
formula zO “ 2 ¨ xI , which matches the summary z 1 “ 2 ¨ x of the program P .
In other words, the analysis of the under-approximation of P of index at most
2 suffices to infer the complete summary of the program (the analysis for values
K ą 2 will necessarily yield the same result, since the under-approximation
method is monotonic in K). This fact matches the completeness result of
Section 5, stating that the analysis needs to be carried up to a certain bound
(linear in the size of the program’s VPG) whenever the language of the VPG
is included in the language of the regular expression w1˚ . . . wn˚ , for some nonempty words w1 , . . . , wn . In our case, the completeness result applies due to
n
n
˚
˚
tpτ1 x τ2 q τ4 pτ2 y τ3 q | n P Nu Ď pτ1 x τ2 q τ4˚ pτ2 y τ3 q .
Related Work The problem of analyzing recursive programs handling integers
(in general, unbounded data domains) has gained significant interest with the
seminal work of Sharir and Pnueli [24]. They proposed two orthogonal approaches
for interprocedural dataflow analysis. The first one keeps precise values (call
strings) up to a limited depth of the recursion stack, which bounds the number
of executions. In contrast to the methods based on the call strings approach,
3
q init
1
x > 0
x0 = x
int P(int x) {
int z;
1: assume(x ≥ 0);
2: if (x > 0)
3:
z := P(x-1);
4:
z := z+2;
t1
q2
z 0 = P (x − 1)
x0 = x
t4
t2
x = 0
z0 = 0
pb
1
pc
2
pa
3
pa
4
: Qinit → τ1 Q2
1
: Q2 → hhτ2 Qinit τ2 ii Q3
1
: Q3 → τ3
: Qinit → τ4
1
q3
t3
5: else
6:
z := 0
7: return z; }
x0 = x
z0 = z + 2
ε
(b)
(a)
k
query (X, xI , zI , xO , zO )
(c)
init
P C0 = X
begin loop
pa
3
P C = Q3
xO = xI
zO = zI + 2
ε
(d)
pa
4
P C = Qinit
1
xI = 0
zO = 0
ε
pc
2
pb
1
P C = Qinit
1
xI > 0
xJ = xI
0
x = xJ
I
z 0 = zJ
I
P C 0 = Q2
x0 = xJ
I
z 0 = zJ
I
P C0 = Y
x0 = xK
O
z 0 =zK
O
k−1
query
(Z, xL , zL , xO , zO )
P C = Q2
Y 0 = Qinit
1
Z 0 = Q3
xJ = xI − 1
zK = zL
xI = xL
out of order/in order
x0 = xL
I
z 0 = zL
I
P C0 = Z
query k−1 (Y, xJ , zJ , xK , zK )
Figure 1: A recursive program returning the parameter value multiplied by two
(a), its corresponding control flow graph (b) and visibly pushdown grammar
(c), and the non-recursive program query k pX, xI , zI , xO , zO q resulting from our
index-bounded under-approximation (d).
our method can also analyse precisely certain programs for which the stack is
unbounded, allowing for unbounded number of executions to be represented at
once.
The second approach of Sharir and Pnueli [24] is based on computing the
least fixed point of a system of recursive dataflow equations (the functional
approach). This approach to interprocedural analysis is based on computing
an increasing Kleene sequence of abstract summaries. It is to be noticed that
abstraction is key to ensuring termination of the Kleene sequence, the result
being an over-approximation of the precise summary. Recently [11], a Newton
sequence defined over the language semiring was shown to converge at least as
fast as the Kleene sequence over the same semiring. An iterate of a Newton
sequence is the set of control paths in the program that correspond to words
produced by a grammar, with bounded number of nonterminals at each step
in the derivation. By increasing this bound, we obtain an increasing sequence
of languages that converges to the language of behavior of the program. Our
contribution can be thus seen as a technique to compute the iterates of the
Newton sequence for programs with integer parameters, return values, and local
variables, the result being, at each step, an under-approximation of the precise
summary.
4
The complexity of the functional approach was shown to be polynomial in
the size of the (finite) abstract domain, in the work of Reps, Horwitz and Sagiv
[23]. This result is achieved by computing summary information, in order to
reuse previously computed information during the analysis. Following up on this
line of work, most existing abstract analyzers, such as InterProc [19], also
use relational domains to compute over-approximations of function summaries
– typically widening operators are used to ensure termination of fixed point
computations. The main difference of our method with respect to static analyses
is the use of under-approximation instead of over-approximation. If the final
purpose of the analysis is program verification, our method will not return false
positives. Moreover, the coverage can be increased by increasing the bound on
the derivation index.
Previous works have applied model checking based on abstraction refinement
to recursive programs. One such method, known as nested interpolants represents
programs as nested word automata [3], which have the same expressive power as
the visibly pushdown grammars used in our paper. Also based on interpolation
is the Whale algorithm [2], which combines partial exploration of the execution
paths (underapproximation) with the overapproximation provided by a predicatebased abstract post operator, in order to compute summaries that are sufficient to
prove a given safety property. Another technique, similar to Whale, although not
handling recursion, is the Smash algorithm [15] which combines may- and mustsummaries for compositional verification of safety properties. These approaches
are, however, different in spirit from ours, as their goal is proving given safety
properties of programs, as opposed to computing the summaries of procedures
independently of their calling context, which is our case. We argue that summary
computation can be applied beyond safety checking, e.g., to prove termination
[5], or program equivalence.
The technique of under-approximation is typically used for bug discovery,
rather than certification of correctness. For instance, bug detection based on
under-approximation has been developed for non-recursive C programs with
arrays [18]. Our approach in orthogonal, as we consider more complex control
structures (possibly recursive procedure calls) but simpler data domains (scalar
values such as integers).
Paper organization. After introducing the basic definition in Section 2, we
present, in Section 3, our model for programs, a semantics based on nested
words and another one, equivalent, based on derivations of the underlying
grammar. Then, in Section 4, we present our main contribution which is a
program transformation underapproximating the semantics of the input program.
In Section 5, we define a class of programs for which the underapproximation is
complete. Finally, after reporting on experiments in Section 6 we conclude in
Section 7.
2
2.1
Preliminaries
Grammars
Let Σ be an alphabet, that is a finite non-empty set of symbols. We denote by Σ˚
the set of finite words over Σ including ε, the empty word. Given a word w P Σ˚ ,
let |w| denote its length and let pwqi , with 1 ď i ď |w|, be the i-th symbol of w.
5
By pwqi...j , with 1 ď i ď j ď |w|, we denote the subword pwqi . . . pwqj of w. For
a word w P Σ˚ and Σ1 Ď Σ, we denote by wÓΣ1 the result of erasing all symbols
of w not in Σ1 .
A context-free grammar (or simply grammar) is a tuple G “ xΞ, Σ, ∆y,
where Ξ is a finite nonempty set of nonterminals, Σ is an alphabet, such that
Ξ X Σ “ H, and ∆ Ď Ξ ˆ pΣ Y Ξq˚ is a finite set of productions. A production
pX, wq P ∆ is often conveniently noted X Ñ w. Also define head pX Ñ w q “ X
and tail pX Ñ wq “ w. Given two strings u, v P pΣYΞq˚ , a production pX, wq P ∆
pX,wq{j
and 1 ď j ď |u|, we define a step u ùùùùùñG v if, and only if, puqj “ X and
v “ puq1 ¨ ¨ ¨ puqj´1 ¨ w ¨ puqj`1 ¨ ¨ ¨ puq|u| . We omit pX, wq or j above the arrow
when it is not important. In this notation and others, when G is clear from the
context, we omit it. Step sequences (including the empty sequence) are defined
using the reflexive transitive closure of the step relation ñ
ù G , denoted ñ
ù ˚G . For
˚
instance, X ñ
ù G w means there exists a sequence of steps that produces the
word w P pΣ Y Ξq˚ , starting from X. We call any step sequence v ñ
ù ˚G w a
˚
derivation whenever v P Ξ and w P Σ . The language produced by G, starting
with a nonterminal X is the set LX pGq “ tw P Σ˚ | X ñ
ù ˚G wu.
By defining a control word to be a sequence of productions γ P ∆˚ , we can
annotate step sequences as expected: ε P ∆˚ is the control word for empty step
γ
sequences, and given a control word γ of length n we write u ñ
ù G v whenever
there exists w0 , . . . , wn P pΞ Y Σq˚ such that
pγq1
pγq2
pγqn
u “ w0 ùùñG w1 ùùñG . . . wn´1 ùùñG wn “ v .
Given a nonterminal X P Ξ and a set Γ Ď ∆˚ of control words (a.k.a control
γ
set), we denote by L̂X pΓ, Gq “ tw P Σ˚ | Dγ P Γ : X ñ
ù wu the language
generated by G using only control words in Γ.
2.2
Visibly Pushdown Grammars
To model the control flow of procedural programs we use languages generated by
visibly pushdown grammars, a subset of context-free grammars. In this setting,
p “ ΣYxxΣYΣyy, where x Σ “ txxa | a P Σu
words are defined over a tagged alphabet Σ
represents procedure call sites and Σyy “ tayy | a P Σu represents procedure return
p ∆y is a grammar that
sites. Formally, a visibly pushdown grammar G “ xΞ, Σ,
has only productions of the following forms, for some a, b P Σ:
XÑa
X Ñ aY
X Ñ x a Y byy Z .
It is worth pointing that, for our purposes, we do not need a visibly pushdown
grammar to generate the empty string ε. Each tagged word generated by visibly
pushdown grammars is associated a nested word [3] the definition of which we
briefly recall. Given a finite alphabet Σ, a nested word over Σ is a pair pw, ;q,
where ; Ď t1, . . . , |w|u ˆ t1, . . . , |w|u is a set of nesting edges (or simply edges)
where:
1. i ; j only if i ă j; edges only go forward;
2. ||tj | i ; ju|| ď 1 and ||ti | i ; ju|| ď 1; no two edges share a call/return
position;
6
3. if i ; j and k ; ` then it is not the case that i ă k ď j ă `; edges do not
cross.
Intuitively, we associate a nested word to a tagged word as follows: there is an
edge between tagged symbols x a and byy if and only if both symbols are produced
by the same derivation step. Finally, let w_nw denote the mapping which given
a tagged word in the language of a visibly pushdown grammar returns the nested
word thereof.
Example 2.1. For the tagged word w “ τ1 x τ2 τ1 x τ2 τ4 τ2 y τ3 τ2 y τ3 , w_nwpwq “
pτ1 τ2 τ1 τ2 τ4 τ2 τ3 τ2 τ3 , t2 ; 8, 4 ; 6uq is the associated nested word.
2.3
Integer Relations
Given a set S, let ||S|| denote its cardinality. We denote by Z the set of integers.
Let x “ xx1 , . . . , xd y be a tuple of variables, for some d ą 0. We define by x1 the
primed variables of x to be the tuple xx11 , x12 , . . . , x1d y. We consider implicitly
that all variables range over Z. We denote by |x| “ d the length of the tuple
x, and for a tuple y “ xy1 , . . . , ye y, we denote by x ¨ y “ xx1 , . . . , xd , y1 , . . . , ye y
their concatenation. For two tuples of variables t and s such that |t| “ |s| “ k,
Źk
we denote by t “ s the conjunction i“1 ti “ si .
řd
A linear term t is a linear combination of the form a0 ` i“1 ai xi , where
a0 , . . . , ad P Z. An atomic proposition is a predicate of the form t ď 0, where
t is a linear term. We consider formulae in the first-order logic over atomic
propositions t ď 0, also known as Presburger arithmetic. A valuation of x
is a function ν : x Ñ
Ý Z. The set of all valuations of x is denoted by Zx . If
x “ xx1 , . . . , xd y and ν P Zx , then νpxq denotes the tuple xνpx1 q, . . . , νpxd qy.
An arithmetic formula Rpx, y1 q defining a relation R Ď Zx ˆ Zy is evaluated
with respect to two valuations ν1 P Zx and ν2 P Zy , by replacing each x P x
by ν1 pxq and each y 1 P y1 by ν2 pyq in R. The composition of two relations
R1 Ď Zx ˆ Zy and R2 Ď Zy ˆ Zz is denoted by R1 ˝ R2 “ txu, vy P Zx ˆ Zz |
Dt P Zy . xu, ty P R1 and xt, vy P R2 u. We denote y Ď x if y “ xxi1 , . . . , xi` y,
for a sequence of indices 1 ď i1 ă . . . ă i` ď d of x. For a valuation ν P Zx
and a tuple y Ď x, we denote by νÓy P Zy the projection of ν onto variables y,
i.e. νÓxy1 ,...,yk y “ xνpy1 q, . . . , νpyk qy. Finally, given two valuations I, O P Zx , we
denote by I ¨O the valuation Ipxq¨Opxq, and we define Zxˆx “ tI ¨O | I, O P Zx u.
2.4
Parikh Images
Let Θ “ tθ1 , . . . , θk u be a linearly ordered subset of the alphabet Σ. For a
symbol a P Σ its Parikh image is defined as P kΘ paq “ ei if a “ θi , where ei
is the k-dimensional vector having 1 on the i-th position and 0 everywhere
else. Otherwise, if a P ΣzΘ, let P kΘ paq “ 0 where 0 is the k-dimensional
vector
with 0 everywhere. For a word w P Σ˚ of length n, we define P kΘ pwq “
řn
1
Furthermore, let P kΘ pLq “ tP kΘ pwq | w P Lu for any
i“1 P kΘ ppwqi q.
˚
language L Ď Σ .
1 We
adopt the convention that the empty sum evaluates to 0.
7
2.5
Labelled Graphs
In this paper we use of the notion of labelled graph G “ xQ, L, δy, where Q is a
finite set of vertices, L is a set of labels whose elements label edges as defined by
`
the edge relation δ Ď Q ˆ S ˆ Q. We denote by q Ñ
Ý q 1 the fact that pq, `, q 1 q P δ.
A path π in G is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges whose endpoints
`1
`2
`n
are vertices. Sometimes, π is conveniently written as q0 ÝÑ
q1 ÝÑ
. . . qn´1 ÝÑ
qn
w
and further abbreviated q0 Ý
Ñ qn where w “ `1 . . . `n .
3
Integer Recursive Programs
We consider in the following that programs are collections of procedures calling
each other, possibly according to recursive schemes. Formally, an integer program
is an indexed tuple P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y, where P1 , . . . , Pn are procedures. Each
out
init
procedure is a tuple Pi “ xxi , xin
, Fi , ∆i y, where xi are the local
i , xi , Si , qi
2
in
variables of Pi (xi X xj “ H for all i ‰ j), xi , xout
Ď xi are the tuples of input
i
and output variables, Si are the control states of Pi (Si X Sj “ H, for all i ‰ j),
qiinit P Si zFi is the initial, and Fi Ď Si (Fi ‰ H) are the final states of Pi , and
∆i is a set of transitions of one of the following forms:
Rpxi ,x1 q
• q ÝÝÝÝÝiÑ q 1 is an internal transition, where q, q 1 P Si , and Rpxi , x1i q is a
Presburger arithmetic relation involving only the local variables of Pi ;
z1 “Pj puq
• q ÝÝÝÝÝÝÑ q 1 is a call, where q, q 1 P Si , Pj is the callee, u are linear terms
out
over xi , z Ď xi are variables, such that |u| “ |xin
j | and |z| “ |xj |. The
1
call is said to be terminal if q P Fi . It is well-known that terminal calls
can be replaced by internal transitions.
The call graph of a program P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y is a directed graph with vertices
P1 , . . . , Pn and an edge pPi , Pj q, for each Pi and Pj , such that Pi has a call to Pj .
A program is recursive if its call graph has at least one cycle, and non-recursive
if its call graph is a dag.
Ťn
In the rest of this paper, we denote by F pPq “ i“1 Fi the set of final states
of the program
P, by nFpPi q the set Si zFi of non-final states of Pi , and by
Ťn
nFpPq “ i“1 nFpPq be the set of non-final states of P.
3.1
Simplified syntax
To ease the description of programs defined in this paper, we use a simplified,
human readable, imperative language such that each procedure of the program
conforms to the following grammar:3
P ::“ proc Pi pid ˚ q begin var id ˚ S0 ; S end
S0 ::“ assume f | goto `` | havoc id ` | id Ð t
S ::“ S0 | S; S | id Ð Pi pt˚ q; S0 | Pi pt˚ q; S0 | return id
2 Observe that there are no global variables in the definition of integer program. Those can
be encoded as input and output variables to each procedure.
3 Our simplified syntax does not seek to capture the generality of integer programs. Instead,
our goal is to give a convenient notation for the programs given in this paper and only those.
8
The local variables occurring in P are denoted by id, linear terms by t, Presburger formulae by f , and control labels by `. Each procedure consists in local
declarations followed by a sequence of statements. Statements may carry a label.
Program statements can be either assume statements4 , assignments, procedure
calls (possibly with a return value), return to the caller (possibly with a value),
non-deterministic jumps goto `1 or . . . or `n , and havoc x1 , x2 , . . . , xn statements5 . In order to simplify the upcoming technical developments, we forbid
empty procedures, procedures starting with a call or a return, i.e. each procedure
must start with a statement generated by the S0 nonterminal. We consider the
usual syntactic requirements (used variables must be declared, jumps are well
defined, no jumps outside procedures, etc.). We do not define them, it suffices to
know that all simplified programs in this paper comply with the requirements.
A program using the simplified syntax can be easily translated into the formal
syntax (Fig. 1).
Example 3.1. Figure 1 shows a program in our simplified imperative language
and its corresponding integer program P. Formally, P “ xP y, where P is the
only procedure in the program, defined as:
P
“
xtx, zu, txu, tzu, tq1init , q2 , q3 , εu, q1init , tεu, tt1 , t2 , t3 , t4 uy
Since P calls itself once (within the call transition t2 ), this program is recursive.
3.2
Semantics
We are interested in computing the summary relation between the values of the
input and output variables of a procedure. To this end, we give the semantics of
a program P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y as a tuple of relations, denoted JqK in the following,
describing, for each non-final control state q P nFpPi q of a procedure Pi , the effect
of the program when started in q upon reaching a state in Fi . The summary of a
procedure Pi is the relation corresponding to its unique initial state, i.e. Jqiinit K.
An interprocedurally valid path is represented by a tagged word over an
p which maps each internal transition t to a symbol τ , and each call
alphabet Θ,
p In the sequel, we denote by Q the
transition t to a pair of symbols x τ, τ y P Θ.
nonterminal corresponding to the control state q, and by τ P Θ the alphabet
symbol corresponding to the transition t of P. Formally, we associate P a visibly
p ∆y, such
pushdown grammar, denoted in the rest of the paper by GP “ xΞ, Θ,
that Q P Ξ if and only if q P nFpPq and:
R
(a) Q Ñ τ P ∆ if and only if t : q ÝÑ q 1 and q 1 P F pPq
R
(b) Q Ñ τ Q1 P ∆ if and only if t : q ÝÑ q 1 and q 1 P nFpPq
z1 “Pj puq
(c) Q Ñ x τ Qinit
τ y Q1 P ∆ if and only if t : q ÝÝÝÝÝÝÑ q 1 .
j
It is easily seen that interprocedurally valid paths in P and tagged words in GP
are in one-to-one correspondence. In fact, each interprocedurally valid path of
P between state q P nFpPi q and a state of Fi , where 1 ď i ď n, corresponds
exactly to one tagged word of LQ pGP q.
4 assume
φ is executable if and only if the current values of the variables satisfy the
Presburger formula φ.
5 havoc assigns non deterministically chosen integers to x , x , . . . , x .
n
1
2
9
Example 3.2. (contd. from Ex. 3.1) The visibly pushdown grammar GP corresponding to P is given in Fig. 1 (c). In the following, we use superscripts
a, b, c to distinguish productions of the form (a) Q Ñ τ , (b) Q Ñ τ Q1 or (c)
Q Ñ x τ Qinit
τ y Q1 , respectively. The language LQinit
pGP q generated by GP
j
1
init
starting with Q1 contains the word w “ τ1 x τ2 τ1 x τ2 τ4 τ2 y τ3 τ2 y τ3 , of which
w_nwpwq “ pτ1 τ2 τ1 τ2 τ4 τ2 τ3 τ2 τ3 , t2 ; 8, 4 ; 6uq is the corresponding nested
word. The word w corresponds to an interprocedurally valid path where P calls
itself twice. The control words γ1 “ pb1 pc2 pb1 pc2 pa4 pa3 pa3 and γ2 “ pb1 pc2 pa3 pb1 pc2 pa4 pa3
γ1
γ2
both produce w in this case, i.e. Qinit
ùñ w and Qinit
ùñ w.
1
1
The semantics of a program is the union of the semantics of the nested words
corresponding to its executions, each of which being a relation over input and
output variables. To define the semantics of a nested word, we first associate to
p an integer relation ρτ , defined as follows:
each τ P Θ
R
• for an internal transition t : q ÝÑ q 1 P ∆i , we define ρτ ” Rpxi , x1i q Ď
Zxi ˆ Zxi ;
z1 “Pj puq
• for a call transition t : q ÝÝÝÝÝÝÑ q 1 P ∆i , we define a call relation ρx τ ”
1
xj
pxin
“ uq Ď Zxi ˆ Zxj , a return
relation ρτ y ” pz1 “ xout
ˆ Zxi
j
j q Ď Z
Ź
1
xi
xi
and a frame relation φτ ” xPxi zz x “ x Ď Z ˆ Z . Intuitively, the
frame relation copies the values of all local variables, that are not involved
in the call as return value receivers (z), across the call.
We define the semantics of the program P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y in a top-down manner.
Assuming a fixed ordering of the non-final states in the program, i.e. nFpPq “
xq1 , . . . , qm y, the semantics of the program P, denoted JPK, is the tuple of
relations xJq1 K, . . . , Jqm Ky. For each non-final control state q P nFpPi q where
xi
1 ď i ď n, we denote by JqK Ď ZŤ
ˆ Zxi the relation (over the local variables of
procedure Pi ) defined as JqK “ αPLQ pGP q JαK.
It remains to define JαK, the semantics of the tagged word (or equivalently
interprocedural valid path) α. Out of convenience, we define the semantics of
its corresponding nested word w_nwpαq “ pθ, ;q over alphabet Θ, and define
JαK “ Jw_nwpαqK. For a nesting relation ; Ď t1, . . . , |θ|u ˆ t1, . . . , |θ|u, we
define ;i,j “ tps ´ pi´1q, t ´ pi´1qq | ps, tq P ; X ti, . . . , ju ˆ ti, . . . , juu, for
some i, j P t1, . . . , `u, i ă j. Finally, we define Jpθ, ;qK Ď Zxi ˆ Zxi as follows:
$
’
if |θ| “ 1
&ρpθq1
ρpθq1 ˝ Jppθq2...|θ| , ;2,|θ| qK
if |θ| ą 1, 1 ; j for no j
’
%
CaRet jθ ˝ Jppθqj`1...|θ| , ;j`1,|θ| qK if |θ| ą 1, 1 ; j for a j
where, in the last case, which corresponds
to call transition t P ∆i˘, we have
`
pθq1 “ pθqj “ τ and define CaRet jθ “ ρx τ ˝ Jpθq2...j´1 , ;2,j´1 qK ˝ ρτ y X φτ .
Example 3.3. (contd. from Ex. 3.2) The semantics of a given the nested
word θ “ pτ1 τ2 τ1 τ2 τ4 τ2 τ3 τ2 τ3 , t2 ; 8, 4 ; 6uq is a relation between valuations
of tx, zu, given by:
`
`
˘
JθK “ ρτ1 ˝ pρx τ2 ˝ ρτ1 ˝˘ pρx τ2 ˝ ρτ4 ˝ ρτ2 y q X φτ2
˝ ρ τ3 ˝ ρ τ y q X φ τ 2 ˝ ρ τ3
2
One can verify that JθK ” x “ 2 ^ z 1 “ 4, i.e. the result of calling P with input
valuation x “ 2 is an output valuation z “ 4.
10
Finally, we introduce a few useful notations. An interprocedural valid path α
is said to be feasible whenever JαK ‰ H. We denote by JPKq the component of
JPK corresponding to q P nFpPq. Notice that JPKq P Zxi ˆ Zxi , i.e. is a relation
over the valuations of the local variables of the procedure Pi if q is a state of
Pi , i.e. q P Si . Slightly abusing notations, we define LPi pGP q as LQinit
pGP q and
i
x
x
i
i
JPKPi as JPKqiinit . Clearly we have that JPKPi Ď Z ˆ Z .
3.3
A Semantics of Depth-First Derivations
We present an alternative, but equivalent, program semantics, using derivations
of visibly pushdown program grammars, instead of the generated (nested) words.
This semantics brings us closer to the notion of under-approximation defined in
the next section.
We start by defining depth-first derivations, that have the following informal
property: if X and Y are two nonterminals produced by the application of one
rule, then the steps corresponding to a full derivation of the form X ñ
ù ˚ u will
be applied without interleaving with the steps corresponding to a derivation of
the form Y ñ
ù ˚ v. In other words, once the derivation of X has started, it will
be finished before the derivation of Y begins.
For an integer tuple α “ xα1 , . . . , αn y, we denote by }α}max “ maxni“1 αi .
For a set of symbols S Ď Ξ Y Σ, and a set of positive integers I Ď N, we define
S I “ txxiy | x P S, i P Iu. Given a word w P pΞ Y Σq˚ of length n ě 0, and
a n-dimensional vector α “ xα1 , . . . , αn y P Nn , we define wα as the birthdatexα y
xα y
annotated word (bd-word) pwq1 1 . . . pwqn n over the alphabet pΞ Y ΣqN .
We denote wxxcyy “ wc , where c P N and c “ xc, . . . , cy P N|w| . For instance,
abcx1,2,3y “ ax1y bx2y cx3y and abcxx2yy “ ax2y bx2y cx2y .
pZ,wq{j
Let G “ xΞ, Σ, ∆y be a grammar and u ùùùùñ v be a step, for some
production pZ, wq P ∆ and 1 ď j ď |u|. If α P N|u| is a vector of birthdates, the corresponding birthdate-annotated step (bd-step) is defined as folpZ,wq{j
lows: uα ùùùùñ v β if and only if puα qj “ Z xiy and v β “ puα q1 ¨ ¨ ¨ puα qj´1 ¨
wxx}α}max `1yy ¨ puα qj`1 ¨ ¨ ¨ puα q|u| .
Example 3.4. Consider the grammar G “ xtX, Y, Zu, ta, bu, ∆y with rules
pX,Y Zq
pY,aY q
∆ “ tX Ñ Y Z, Y Ñ aY | ε, Z Ñ Zb | εu. Then X x0y ùùùùñ Y x1y Z x1y ùùùùñ
pZ,Zbq
pY,εq
pZ,εq
ax2y Y x2y Z x1y ùùùùñ ax2y Y x2y Z x3y bx3y ùùùñ ax2y Z x3y bx3y ùùùñ ax2y bx3y and
pX,Y Zq
pY,aY q
pY,εq
pZ,Zbq
pZ,εq
X x0y ùùùùñ Y x1y Z x1y ùùùùñ ax2y Y x2y Z x1y ùùùñ ax2y Z x1y ùùùùñ ax2y Z x3y bx3y ùùùñ
x2y x3y
a b are birthdate-annotated step sequences.
A birthdate annotated step is further said to be depth-first whenever, in
the above definition of a bd-step, we have, moreover, that i is the most recent
birthdate among the nonterminals of u , i.e. i “ max tj | P kΞtju puα q ‰ 0u. We
write this fact as follows uα ù
ñ v β . A birthdate annotated step sequence is said to
df
pγq1 {j1
be depth-first if all of its steps are depth-first. Finally, a step sequence w0 ùùùùñ
pγqn {jn
w1 . . . wn´1 ùùùùñ wn for some control word γ is said to be depth-first, written
γ
w0 ùñ wn , if there exist vectors α1 P N||P kΞ pw1 q|| , . . . , αn P N||P kΞ pwn q|| such that
df
xx0yy pγq1 {j1
w0
ùùùùñ
df
α
pγqn {jn
n´1
w1α1 . . . wn´1
ùùùùñ wnαn holds.
df
11
Example 3.5. (contd. from Ex. 3.4) Consider the grammar G from Example
pX,Y Zq
pY,aY q
pZ,Zbq
pY,q
pZ,q
3.4. Then X ùùùùñ Y Z ùùùùñ aY Z ùùùùñ aY Zb ùùùñ aZb ùùùñ ab is not
pX,Y Zq
pY,aY q
pY,q
pZ,Zbq
a depth-first derivation, whereas X ùùùùñ Y Z ùùùùñ aY Z ùùùñ aZ ùùùùñ
pZ,q
aZb ùùùñ ab is a depth-first derivation.
p ∆y
Since we are dealing with visibly pushdown grammars GP “ xΞ, Θ,
init
1
corresponding to programs P, for every production Q Ñ
Ý x τ Qj τ y Q P ∆ we
have Qinit
‰ Q1 . Hence, we can assume wlog that for all productions p P ∆,
j
all nonterminals occurring in tail ppq are distinct (e.g. X Ñ Z Z is not allowed).
As we show next, under that assumption, a control word uniquely identifies a
depth-first derivation:
p ∆y be a visibly pushdown grammar corresponding
Lemma 3.1. Let GP “ xΞ, Θ,
γ
γ
to a program P, Q P Ξ be a nonterminal, Q ù
ñ u and Q ù
ñ v be two depth-first
df
df
derivations of GP . Then they differ in no step, hence u “ v.
Proof. By contradiction, suppose that there exists a step that differs in the two
derivations from Q with control word γ P ∆˚ . Thus, there exists an integer
pγq1
pγqi
i, 1 ď i ă |γ|, such that Q “ w0 ùñ w1 ¨ ¨ ¨ wi´1 ùñ wi and wi contains
two occurrences of the nonterminal head ppγqi`1 q, that is, there exists p1 ‰ p2
pwi qp1 “ pwi qp2 “ head ppγqi`1 q. Two cases arise:
1. pwi qp1 and pwi qp2 result from the occurrence of some pγqj with j ď i which
contradicts that all nonterminals occurring in tail ppγqj q are distinct.
2. pwi qp1 and pwi qp2 result from the occurrence of pγqk and pγql with k ‰
l respectively. Hence in the bd-step sequence thereof, their birthdate
necessarily differ. Therefore there is only one occurence of head ppγqi`1 q
with the most recent birthdate which contradicts the existence of two
distinct depth-first derivations.
Consequently, in a visibly pushdown grammar corresponding to a program,
a control word uniquely determines a step sequence, and, moreover, if this step
sequence is a derivation, the control word determines the word produced by
it. This remark leads to the definition of an alternative semantics of programs,
based on control words, instead of produced words. To this end, for each
non-final control location q P nFpPi q, of a program P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y, where
1 ď i ď n, we define the semantics of a control word γ that induces a depth-first
γ
p ∆y, as a set JγK Ď Zx ˆ Zx ,
derivation Q ù
ñ w of the grammar GP “ xΞ, Θ,
df
where x “ x1 ¨ . . . ¨ xn is the set of variables in P. The definition of JγK is by
induction on the structure of γ:
(
(a) if γ “ Q Ñ
Ý τ then JγK “ I ¨ O | xIÓxi , OÓxi y P ρτ , where Q P Ξ corresponds to q P nFpPi q;
(b) if γ “ pQ Ñ
Ý τ Q1 q ¨ γ 1 then
(
JγK “ I ¨ O | DJ . xIÓxi , JÓxi y P ρτ and J ¨ O P Jγ 1 K
where Q, Q1 P Ξ correspond to q, q 1 P nFpPi q;
12
(c) if γ “ pQ Ñ
Ý x τ Qinit
τ y Q1 q ¨ γ 1 then JγK is given by
j
tI ¨ O | DJ, K, L P Zx . xIÓxi , JÓxj y P ρx τ , J ¨ K P Jγ1 K,
xKÓxj , LÓxi y P ρτ y , xIÓxi , LÓxi y P φτ , L ¨ O P Jγ2 Ku ,
where Qinit
, Q1 P Ξ correspond to qjinit (the initial control location of Pj ),
j
γ1
γ2
df
df
q 1 P nFpPi q, and Qinit
ù
ñ w1 , Q1 ù
ñ w2 , γ 1 “ γ1 γ2 , respectively; since γ is
j
the control word of a depth-first derivation, the derivations of Qinit
and Q1
j
are unique, and will not interleave with each other.
The following lemma proves the equivalence of the semantics of a (tagged) word
generated by a visibly pushdown grammar and that of a control word that
produces it.
p ∆y be a visibly pushdown grammar for a program
Lemma 3.2. Let GP “ xΞ, Θ,
P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y, x “ x1 ¨ . . . ¨ xn be the concatenation of all tuples of local
variables in P, Q P Ξ be a nonterminal corresponding to a non-final control
γ
p˚
location q P nFpPi q, and Q ù
ñ α be a depth-first derivation of GP , where α P Θ
df
and γ P ∆˚ . Then, we have:
JγK “ I ¨ O P Zxˆx | xIÓxi , OÓxi y P JαK
(
.
Ý τ , we have α “ τ ,
Proof. By induction on |γ| ą 0. If |γ| “ 1, i.e. γ “ Q Ñ
hence JαK “ Jw_nwpαqK “ ρτ and the equality follows trivially. If |γ| ą 1, let
γ “ p ¨ γ 1 , for some p P ∆ and some γ 1 P ∆˚ . We distinguish two cases, based on
the type of p:
γ1
• p “ Q Ñ
Ý τ Q1 : in this case α “ τ ¨ β and Q1 ù
ñ β is a depth-first
df
1
derivation of GP . By the induction
( hypothesis, since |γ | ă |γ|, we have
1
Jγ K “ J ¨ O | xJÓxi , OÓxi y P JβK .
JγK “ tI ¨ O | DJ . xIÓxi , JÓxi y P ρτ and xJÓxi , OÓxi y P JβKu
“ tI ¨ O | xIÓxi , OÓxi y P Jw_nwpαqKu
“ tI ¨ O | xIÓxi , OÓxi y P JαKu
• p“QÑ
Ý x τ Qinit
τ y Q1 : in this case α “ x τ β1 τ y β2 and GP has depthj
γ1
γ2
df
df
first derivations Qinit
ù
ñ β1 and Q1 ù
ñ β2 . We have two symmetrical
j
cases: either γ 1 “ γ1 γ2 or γ 1 “ γ2 γ1 . We consider the first case in the
following:
JγK
“
tI ¨ O |
DJ, K, L P Zx . xIÓxi , JÓxj y P ρx τ ,
J ¨ K P Jγ1 K, xKÓxj , LÓxi y P ρτ y ,
xIÓxi , LÓxi y P φτ , L ¨ O P Jγ2 Ku
We apply the induction hypothesis to γ1 and γ2 , since |γ1 | ă |γ| and |γ2 | ă |γ|,
and obtain:
JγK
DJ, K, L P Zx . xIÓxi , JÓxj y P ρx τ ,
xJÓxj , KÓxj y P Jβ1 K, xKÓxj , LÓxi y P ρτ y ,
xIÓxi , LÓxi y P φτ , xLÓxi , OÓxi y P Jβ2 Ku
“ tI ¨ O | xIÓxi , OÓxi y P Jw_nwpαqKu
“ tI ¨ O | xIÓxi , OÓxi y P JαKu
“
tI ¨ O |
13
Consequently, the semantics of a program P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y can be equivalently defined considering the sets
Ť
γ
JγKu ,
JPKq “ txIÓxi , OÓxi y | I ¨ O P
Qù
ñ
w
df
for each non-final state q P nFpPi q of the procedure Pi of P.
4
Underapproximating the Program Semantics
In what follows we define context-free language underapproximations by filtering
out derivations. In particular, in this section, we define a family of underapproximations of JPK, called bounded-index underapproximations. Then we show
that each k-index underapproximation of the semantics of a (possibly recursive)
program P coincides with the semantics of a non-recursive program computable
from P and k.
4.1
Index-bounded derivations
The central notion of this section are index-bounded derivations, i.e. derivations
in which each step has a limited budget of nonterminals. This notion is the key
to our underapproximation method.
For a given integer constant k ą 0, a word u P pΣ Y Ξq˚ is said to be of index
k, if u contains at most k occurrences of nonterminals (formally, |uÓΞ | ď k ). A
step u ñ v is said to be k-indexed, denoted u ùñ v, if and only if both u and
pkq
v are of index k. As expected, a step sequence is k-indexed if all its steps are
k-indexed. For instance, both derivations from Ex. 3.5 are of index 2.
Lemma 4.1. For every grammar G “ xΞ, Σ, ∆y the following properties hold:
(1) ùñ˚ Ď ùùùñ˚ for all k ě 1
pkq
(2) ñ
ù “
pk`1q
Ť8
k“1
ùñ˚
pkq
(3) for all X, Y P Ξ, XY ùñ˚ w P Σ˚ if and only if there exist w1 , w2 P Σ˚ ,
pkq
such that w “ w1 w2 and either: (i) X ùùùñ˚ w1 and Y ùñ˚ w2 , or
pk´1q
pkq
(ii) Y ùùùñ˚ w2 and X ùñ˚ w1 .
pk´1q
pkq
Proof. The proof of points (1) and (2) follow immediately from the definition of
ùñ˚ . Let us now turn to the proof of point (3) (only if). First we define w1 and
pkq
w2 . Consider the step sequence XY ùñ˚ w and look at the last step. It must
pkq
be of the form uZv ùñ˚ uyv “ w, where u, v, y P Σ˚ , and one of the following
pkq
must hold: Z has been generated from either X or Y . Suppose that Z stems
from Y (the other case is treated similarly). In this case, transitively remove
from the step-sequence all the steps transforming the rightmost occurrence of
14
Y . Hence we obtain a step sequence XY ùñ˚ w1 Y . Then w2 is the unique
pkq
word satisfying w “ w1 w2 . Since XY ùñ˚ w1 Y , by removing the occurrence of
pkq
Y in rightmost position at every step, we find that X ùùùñ˚ w1 , and we are
pk´1q
done. Having Z stemming from X yields Y ùùùñ˚ w2 . For the proof of the
pk´1q
other direction (if) assuming (i) (the other case is similar), it is easily seen that
XY ùñ˚ w1 Y ùñ˚ w1 w2 .
pkq
pkq
The previous definitions extend
naturally
`
˘˚ to bd-steps and bd-step sequences,
and we define Υpkq “ twβ P pΞ Y ΣqN | |wβ ÓΞN | ď ku the set of bd-words
with at most k occurrences of nonterminals. We write the fact that a bd-step
sequence uα ñ˚ v β is both k-indexed and depth-first as uα ùùùñ˚ v β . For any
df pkq
symbol X P Ξ and constant k ą 0, we define the languages:
pkq
LX pGq “ tw P Σ˚ | X ùñ˚ wu
pkq
Γ
df pkq
γ
pGq “ tγ P ∆ | Du , v β P Υpkq : uα ùùùñ v β u .
˚
α
df pkq
Example 4.1. (contd. from Ex. 3.2) Inspecting the grammar GP from Ex.3.2
reveals that
n
n
LQinit
pGP q “ tpτ1 x τ2 q τ4 pτ2 y τ3 q | n P Nu .
1
For each value of n we give a 2-index derivation capturing the word: repeat n
times the steps
pb1 pc2
pa
3
Qinit
ùùñ τ1 x τ2 Qinit
ñ τ1 x τ2 Qinit
1
1 τ2 y Q3 ù
1 τ2 y τ3
followed by the step
pa
4
Qinit
ùñ τ4 .
1
p2q
Therefore the 2-index approximation of GP shows that LQinit
pGP q “ LQinit pGP q.
1
1
Example 4.2. (contd. from Ex. 3.5) For the grammar G from Ex. 3.5, we
obtain the following control sets:
Γdf p1q
Γdf p2q
“ pY, aY q˚ pY, εq Y pZ, Zbq˚ pZ, εq
“ pX, Y ZqpY, aY q˚ pY, εqpZ, Zbq˚ pZ, εqY
pX, Y ZqpZ, Zbq˚ pZ, εqpY, aY q˚ pY, εq Y Γdf p1q .
We recall a known result.
Proposition 1 ([20]). For all k ě 1, G “ pΞ, Σ, ∆q and X P Ξ, we have
pkq
LX pGq “ L̂X pΓdf pkq , Gq.
Finally, given k ě 1, we define the k-index semantics of P as JPKpkq “
xJq1 Kpkq , . . . , Jqm Kpkq y, where nFpPq “ tq1 , . . . , qm u and the k-index semantics of
a non-final control state q P nFpPi q of a procedure Pi of the program P is the
pkq
relation JqK “ JPKq Ď Zxi ˆ Zxi , defined as:
Ť
γ
JPKpkq
JγKu .
q “ txIÓxi , OÓxi y | I ¨ O P
Qù
ùùñw
df pkq
15
pY, aY q
pZ, Zbq
pY, εq
tY utZu
tZu
pY, aY q
pZ, εq
pY, εq
pX, Y Zq
tXu
tY, Zu
0
pZ, εq
pZ, Zbq
tZutY u
pY, εq
tY u
pZ, εq
pZ, Zbq
pY, aY q
Figure 2: The graph Adf pkq pGq for k ě 2 and for the grammar G of Ex. 3.5
4.2
Depth-first index-bounded control sets
For a bd-word wα , let
rwα s “ P kΞt}α}max u pwα q ¨ P kΞt}α}max ´1u pwα q ¨ ¨ ¨ P kΞt0u pwα q .
Each symbol in rwα s is a ||Ξ||-dimensional vector, that is rwα s P pN||Ξ|| q˚ . Therefore with a slight abuse, we can view each of these tuples as a multiset on Ξ.
Moreover, each tuple P kΞtiu pwα q in rwα s is the multiset of nonterminals that
occur in wα with the same birthdate 0 ď i ď }α}max , and the elements of rwα s
are ordered in the reversed order of their birthdates. For instance, the first tuple
P kΞt}α}max u pwα q is the multiset of the most recently added nonterminals. Notice
that for each bd-word u we have rus “ 0 if u P pΣN q˚ . Finally, let 0 be the
identity element for concatenation, i.e. rwα s ¨ 0 “ 0 ¨ rwα s “ rwα s.
x0y
x1y x1y
Example 4.3. (contd. from Ex. 3.5) For the bd-step“sequence
ù
ù
‰ X ñ
“ Y Z ‰ ñ
ax2y Y x2y Z x1y ñ
ù ax2y Y x2y Z x3y bx3y (Ex. 3.5) we have X x0y “ tXu, Y x1y Z x1y “
“
‰
“
‰
tY, Zu, ax2y Y x2y Z x1y “ tY u ¨ tZu and ax2y Y x2y Z x3y bx3y “ tZu ¨ tY u .
The r.s operator is lifted from bd-words to sets of bd-words, i.e. subsets of
˘˚
“
‰
pΣYΞqN . The set Υpkq is of particular interest in the following developments.
“
‰
“
‰
Next we define the graph Adf pkq pGq “ x Υpkq , p∆˚ , ¨q, Ñy, where Υpkq is the
set of vertices, ∆ is the set of edge labels and Ñ is the edge relation, defined as:
`
pZ,wq
vr ÝÝÝÑ w
r if and only if:
• vr “ pr
v q1 ¨ vrt , where pr
v q1 P N||Ξ|| , and P kΞ pZq ď pr
v q1 , i.e. Z occurs with
maximal birthdate vr, that is, it occurs in pr
v q1 , and
• w
r “ P kΞ pwq ¨ ppr
v q1 ´ P kΞ pZqq ¨ vrt , i.e. Z is removed from its multiset pr
v q1 ,
r
and the nonterminals of w are added, with maximal birthdate to obtain w.
γ
r in Adf pkq pGqu. For example,
Next, define LpAdf pkq pGqq “ tγ P ∆˚ | vr Ý
Ñ w
df pkq
Fig. 2 shows the A
graph for the grammar G from Ex. 3.5. The next lemma
proves that the paths of Adf pkq pGq represent the control words of the depth-first
derivations of G of index k. In the following, we omit the argument G from
Γdf pkq pGq, or Adf pkq pGq, when it is clear from the context.
16
Lemma 4.2. Given a grammar G “ xΞ, Σ, ∆y, and k ą 0, for each X P Ξ and
γ
γ P ∆˚ , there exists a derivation X ùùùñ w, for some w P Σ˚ , if and only if
df pkq
γ
rXs Ý
Ñ 0 in Adf pkq pGq.
γ
Proof. “ñ” We shall prove the following more general statement. Let uα ùùùñ
df pkq
wβ be a k-indexed depth-first bd-step sequence. By induction on |γ| ě 0, we
‰
γ “
show the existence of a path ruα s Ý
Ñ wβ in Adf pkq .
“ ‰
For the base case |γ| “ 0, we have uα “ wβ which yields ruα s “ wβ and
“
‰
since uα P Υpkq by definition of Γdf pkq we have that ruα s P Υpkq and we are
done.
pZ,xq
For the induction step |γ| ą 0, let v η ùùùñ wβ be the last step of the sequence,
df pkq
for some pZ, xq P ∆, i.e. γ “ σ ¨ pZ, xq with σ P ∆˚ . By the induction hypothesis,
σ
Adf pkq has a path ruα s Ý
Ñ rv η s. Let rv η s “ v1 ¨ vrt , where v1 “ prv η sq1 P N|Ξ| , and
|Ξ| ˚
q is a sequence of multisets
“vrt Pβ ‰pN pkq
“ ‰ of nonterminals. It remains to show that
w P Υ , P kΞ pZq ď v1 and wβ “ P kΞ pxq ¨ pv1 ´ P kΞ pZqq ¨ vrt to conclude
‰
‰
pZ,xq “
γ “
that Adf pkq has an edge rv η s ÝÝÝÑ wβ , hence a path ruα s Ý
Ñ wβ .
pZ,xq{j
Since v η ùùùùñ wβ for some 1 ď j ď |v η | we have that pv η qj “ Z xiy
df pkq
where i “ max tj | P kΞtju pv η q ‰ 0u and wβ “ pv η q1 . . . pv η qj´1 ¨ xxx}η}max `1yy ¨
pv η qj`1 . . . pv η q|vη | . It is easily seen that }β}max “ }η}max ` 1. Moreover, since
i is the maximal birthdate among the non-terminals of v η , we have rv η s “
P kΞtiu pv η q . . . P kΞt0u pv η q, hence v1 “ P kΞtiu pv η q and vrt “ P kΞti´1u pv η q . . . P kΞt0u pv η q.
Also we have P kΞtju pwβ q “ 0 for all j, i ă j ď }η}max , P kΞtiu pwβ q “ P kΞtiu pv η q´
P kΞtiu pZ xiy q and P kΞt`u pwβ q “ P kΞt`u pv η q for all `, 0 ď ` ă i. Using the foregoing properties of wβ the following equalities are easy to check:
“ β‰
w
“ P kΞt}η}max `1u pwβ q ¨ P kΞt}η}max u pwβ q . . . P kΞt0u pwβ q
“ P kΞt}η}max `1 u pwβ q ¨ P kΞtiu pwβ q ¨ P kΞti´1u pwβ q . . . P kΞt0u pwβ q
“ P kΞ pxq ¨ P kΞtiu pwβ q ¨ P kΞti´1u pwβ q . . . P kΞt0u pwβ q
“ P kΞ pxq ¨ pP kΞtiu pv η q ´ P kΞtiu pZ xiy qq . . . P kΞt0u pwβ q
“ P kΞ pxq ¨ pv1 ´ P kΞ pZqq ¨ P kΞti´1u pwβ q . . . P kΞt0u pwβ q
“ P kΞ pxq ¨ pv1 ´ P kΞ pZqq ¨ P kΞti´1u pv η q . . . P kΞt0u pv η q
“ P kΞ pxq ¨ pv1 ´ P kΞ pZqq ¨ vrt
“ ‰
This concludes that wβ “ P kΞ pzq ¨ pv1 ´ P kΞ pZqq ¨ vrt , and since wβ P Υpkq , we
‰
‰
pZ,xq “
γ “
obtain that rv η s ÝÝÝÑ wβ is an edge in Adf pkq , and finally that ruα s Ý
Ñ wβ
is a path in Adf pkq .
γ
rÝ
Ñw
r be a path of Adf pkq pGq.
“ð” We prove a more general statement. Let u
We show by induction on |γ| that there exist bd-words uα , wβ P Υpkq , such that
“ ‰
γ
ruα s “ u
r, wβ “ w,
r and uα ùùùñ wα .
df pkq
“
‰
r“w
r P Υpkq then
The base case |γ| “ 0 is trivial, because u
r and since u
there exists uα P Υpkq such that ruα s “ u
r, and we are done.
For the induction step |γ| ą 0, let γ “ σ¨pZ, xq, for some production pZ, xq P ∆
and σ P ∆˚ . By the induction hypothesis, there exist bd-words uα , v η P Υpkq
17
σ
σ
pZ,xq
r “ ruα s Ý
r is a path in Adf pkq , and uα ùùùñ v η is a
such that u
Ñ rv η s ÝÝÝÑ w
df pkq
k-index bd-step sequence. By the definition of the edge relation in Adf pkq , it
follows that rv η s “ P kΞtiu pv η q ¨ vrt where i “ max tj | P kΞtiu pv η q ‰ 0u. Moreover,
there exists j, 1 ď j ď |v η | such that pv η qj “ Z xiy since P kΞ pZq ď P kΞtiu pv η q.
Now define wβ “ pv η q1 . . . pv η qj´1 ¨ xxx}η}max `1yy ¨ pv η qj`1 . . . pv η q|vη | . It is routine
“ ‰
pZ,xq{j
r “ wβ which concludes the
to check v η ùùùùñ wβ holds. Next we show, w
df
proof.
w
r
vt
“P kΞ pxq¨pP kΞtiu pv η q´P kΞ pZqq¨r
“P kΞt}η}max `1u pxxx}η}max `1yy q¨pP kΞtiu pv η q´P kΞtiu pZ xiy qq¨r
vt
vt
“P kΞt}η}max `1u pwβ q¨pP kΞtiu pv η q´P kΞtiu pZ xiy qq¨r
“P kΞt}η}max `1u pwβ q¨pP kΞtiu pv η q´P kΞtiu pZ xiy qq¨
P kΞti´1u pv η q . . . P kΞt0u pv η q
Since i “ max tj | P kΞtiu pv η q ‰ 0u; P kΞt`u pwβ q “ P kΞt`u pv η q for 0 ď ` ă i and
P kΞtiu pwβ q “ P kΞtiu pv η q´P kΞtiu pZ xiy q show that
“P kΞt}η}max `1u pwβ q¨P kΞtiu pwβ qP kΞti´1u pwβ q . . . P kΞt0u pwβ q
“P kΞt}η}max `1u pwβ q¨P kΞtiu pwβ qP kΞti´1u pwβ q . . . P kΞt0u pwβ q
“ ‰
“ wβ
Consequently, we have the following (also proved in [22]):
Corollary 1. For all k ě 1, G “ pΞ, Σ, ∆q and X P Ξ, we have Γdf pkq is regular.
4.3
Bounded-index Underapproximations of Control Structures
We start describing our program transformation, from a recursive program to
a non-recursive program in which all computation traces correspond to words
generated by an index-bounded grammar. In the beginning we choose to ignore
the data manipulations, and give the non-recursive program only in terms of
transitions between control locations and (non-recursive) calls. Then we show
that the execution traces of this new program match the depth-first indexbounded derivations of the visibly pushdown grammar of the original program.
Let P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y be a recursive program. For the moment, let us assume
that P has no (local) variables, and thus, all the labels of the internal transitions,
as well as all the call, return and frame relations are trivially true. As we did
previously, we assume a fixed ordering q1 , . . . , qm on the set nFpPq of non-final
p ∆y be the visibly pushdown grammar associated
states of P. Let GP “ xΞ, Θ,
with P, where each non-final state q of P is associated a nonterminal Q P Ξ.
Then, for a given constant K ą 0, we define a non-recursive program HK that
captures only the traces of P corresponding to K-index depth-first derivations
of GP (Algorithm 1). Formally, we define HK “ xquery 0 , query 1 , . . . , query K y,
i.e. the program is structured in K ` 1 procedures, such that:
18
• query 0 consists of a single statement assume false, i.e. no execution going
through a call of query 0 is possible,
• all executions of query k , for each 1 ď k ď K correspond to k-index
depth-first derivations of GP .
We distinguish between grammar productions of type (a) Q Ñ
Ý τ , (b) Q Ñ
Ý τ Q1
and (c) Q Ñ
Ý x τ, Qinit
τ y Q1 (see Ex. 3.2) of the visibly pushdown grammar
j
p are finite sets, we associate each nonterminal Q P Ξ
p ∆y. Since Ξ and Θ
G “ xΞ, Θ,
p an integer 1 ď Iτ ď ||Θ||,
p
an integer 1 ď IQ ď ||Ξ||, each alphabet symbol τ P Θ
and define the productions by the following formulae:
ł
πa px, yq ”
x “ IQ ^ y “ Iτ
pQÑ
Ý τ qP∆
ł
πb px, y, zq ”
x “ IQ ^ y “ Iτ ^ z “ IQ 1
pQÑ
Ý τ Q1 qP∆
ł
`
πc px, y, z, t, sq ”
x “ IQ ^ y “ Ix τ ^
1 qP∆
pQÑ
Ý x τ Qinit
τ
y
Q
j
˘
z “ IQinit
^ t “ Iτ y ^ s “ IQ1
j
It is easy to see that the sizes of the πa , πb and πc formulae are linear in the
size of P (there is one disjunctive clause per production of GP , and each such
production corresponds to a transition of P). The translation of P into H can
hence be implemented as a linear time source-to-source program transformation.
Algorithm 1: proc query k pXq for 1 ď k ď K
begin
var PC, y, z ;
asgnk
PC Ð X ;
0:
k
start :
goto prodka or prodkb or prodkc ;
k
proda :
assume Dτ. πa pPC, τ q ;
asgnk
assume true ;
a:
return;
prodk
havoc (y) ;
b:
assume Dτ. πb pPC, τ, yq ;
asgnk
PC Ð y ;
b:
goto startk ;
k
prodc :
havoc (y,z) ;
assume Dτ, τ 1 . πc pPC, τ, y, τ 1 , zq ;
ndetk :
goto swapk or asgnkc ;
k
swap :
swap (y, z) ;
asgnk
PC Ð z ;
c:
query k´1 pyq ;
goto startk ;
end
/* Q Ñ τ */
/* Q Ñ τ Q1 */
1 1
/* QÑτ Qinit
j τ Q */
Next, we show a mapping from the paths of Adf pkq onto the feasible interprocedural valid paths of query k . To relate these paths, we need to introduce the
19
“
‰
p
Given s P Υpkq Y tsink u and p P ∆ define δps, pq “ s1 if s Ý
Ñ s1 holds in Adf pkq
p
for some s1 , otherwise (s Ý
Ñ s1 holds for no s1 ) then δps, pq “ sink . The output
mapping λ is defined as follows:
k´|r
v|
v|
1. λptXu ¨ vr, pX, τ qq “ startk´|rv| prodk´|r
asgna
startk´|rv|`1 , if vr ‰ ε;
a
k
k
k
2. λptXu, pX, τ qq “ start proda asgna
k´|r
v|
k´|r
v|
3. λptXu ¨ vr, pX, τ X 1 qq “ startk´|rv| prodb
asgnb
startk´|rv|
k´|r
v|
k´|r
v|
1
4. λptXu ¨ vr, pX,
X2 qq “ start
prodc
ndetk´|rv|
( τ X1 τinit
init
1
2
5. λp Q , Q ¨ vr, pQ , τ Q qq “
k´|r
v|
k´|r
v |´1
k´|r
v |´1
asgnc
asgn
startk´|rv|´1 prodb
( 0
init
1
1
6. λp Q , Q ¨ vr, pQ , τ qq “
k´|r
v|
k´|r
v |´1
k´|r
v|
k´|r
v |´1
k´|r
v |´1
asgnb
startk´|rv|´1
k´|r
v |´1
startk´|rv|
k´|r
v |´1
startk´|rv|´1
v |´1
swapk´|rv| asgn
asgn0
startk´|rv|´1 prodk´|r
asgna
a
( c
init
1
1
2
7. λp Q , Q ¨ vr, pQ , τ Q qq “
k´|r
v |´1
swapk´|rv| asgnc
asgn0
startk´|rv|´1 prodb
asgnb
8. λps, pq “ K, for all s and p, such that δps, pq “ sink holds.
Figure 3: Definition of the mappings δ and λ for SC kQ .
notion of gsm mappings.
Definition 1 ([14]). A generalized sequential machine, abbreviated gsm, is a
6-tuple S “ xK, Σ, ∆, δ, λ, q1 y where (1) K is a finite non-empty set of states;
(2) Σ and ∆ respectively are input and output alphabet; (3) δ and λ are mappings
from K ˆ Σ into K and ∆˚ , respectively; (4) q1 P K is the start state. The
functions δ and λ are extended by induction to K ˆ Σ˚ by defining for every
state q, x P Σ˚ , and y P Σ:
• δpq, εq “ q and λpq, εq “ ε.
• δpq, xyq “ δpδpq, xq, yq and λpq, xyq “ λpq, xqλpδpq, xq, yq.
The operation defined by Spxq “ λpq1 , xq for each x P Σ˚ is called a gsm mapping.
“
‰
We define the gsm SC kQ “ x Υpkq Y tsink u, ∆, L, δ, λ, rQsy upon Adf pkq ,
where L denotes the statement labels found in query 0 , . . . , query k ; and the
mappings δ and λ are given by the rules of Fig. 3.
p ∆y, and k ą 0, for
Lemma 4.3. For a visibly pushdown grammar G “ xΞ, Θ,
each Q P Ξ the set of feasible interprocedural valid paths of query k pQq coincides
γ
with the set tSC kQ pγq | rQs Ý
Ñ 0 in Adf pkq u.
Proof. The feasible interprocedural valid paths of query k pQq at Algorithm 1
δ
δ
δn´1
0
1
matches sequences of the form σ0 ÝÑ
σ1 ÝÑ
. . . ÝÝÝÑ σn , where each σi P Ξ˚ is
a stack, i.e. a possibly empty sequence of frames each containing a snapshot of
the value of the local variable PC, δi P ∆ are productions of G. The sequence of
stacks σ0 , σ1 , . . . , σn are snapshots of values of the local variable PC between two
consecutive visit to a start label or between the last visit to a start label and
the last return. Instances of such consecutive visits are given by startk , prodka ,
asgnka ; or startk , prodka , asgnka , return, startk`1 (when returning from a
previous call); or startk , prodkc , ndetk , swapk , asgnkc , startk´1 (immediately
after entering the call query k´1 ).
When Algorithm 1 is started with a call to query k pQq, the first stack in the
trace is Q. The set of stack sequences are generated by a labelled graph defined
20
by the following rules, where the stack on both sides of each rule are words
w P Ξ˚ such that |w| ď k.
pQ,τ q
(a) Q ¨ σ ÝÝÝÑ σ
pQ,τ Q1 q
(b) Q ¨ σ ÝÝÝÝÝÑ Q1 ¨ σ
pQ,xxτ Q1 τ y Q2 q
pQ,xxτ Q1 τ y Q2 q
(c) we have either (i) Q ¨ σ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÑ Q1 ¨ Q2 ¨ σ, or (ii) Q ¨ σ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÑ
Q2 ¨ Q1 ¨ σ
Following the previous definition, we find that the set of sequences of control
γ
labels tSC kQ pγq | Q Ý
Ñ εu coincides with the feasible interprocedural valid path
of query k pQq.
γ
Next we show that Q Ý
Ñ ε is a valid stack sequence of query k pQq if and only
γ
if rQs Ý
Ñ 0 in Adf pkq pGq. For this, consider the following relation between the
“
‰
r P Υpkq : we write σ Î w
stacks σ P Ξ˚ such that |σ| ď k and words w
r if and
only if exactly one of the following holds:
(1) |σ| “ |w|
r and, for all 1 ď i ď |w|
r : tpσqi u “ pwq
r i , or
r ` 1, pwq
r 1 “ tpσq1 , pσq2 u, and for all 1 ă i ď |w|
r : tpσqi`1 u “ pwq
r i.
(2) |σ| “ |w|
The proof goes by induction and shows the following stronger statement relating
the reachable stacks and the states of Adf pkq reachable from rQs: for any stack
γ
γ
sequence Q Ý
Ñ σ, there exists a path rQs Ý
Ñw
r in Adf pkq , such that σ Î w,
r and
vice versa.
By putting together the previous result about the feasible interprocedural
valid paths of query k pQq we find that they coincide with the set tSC kQ pγq |
γ
rQs Ý
Ñ 0 in Adf pkq u.
4.4
Bounded-index Underapproximations of Programs
Algorithm 1 implements the transformation of the control structure of a recursive
program P into a non-recursive program HK “ xquery 0 , . . . , query K y, which
simulates its K-index derivations (actually, the control words thereof). In this
section we extend this construction to programs with integer variables and data
manipulations (Algorithm 2), by defining a set of procedures query k , for all
0 ď k ď K, such that each procedure query k has five sets of local variables, all
of the same cardinality as x: two sets, named xI and xO , are used as input
variables, whereas the other three sets, named xJ , xK and xL are used locally
by query k . Besides, each query k has local variables called PC, τ , y, z and input
k
variable X. There are no output variables in query k . Let Vquery
denote the
k
K
1
K
tuple of local variables of query , and let VH “ Vquery ¨ . . . ¨ Vquery be the tuple
of all variables of HK .
For two tuples of variables x and y of equal length, and a valuation ν P Zx ,
we denote by νry{xs the valuation that maps pyqi into pνpxqqi , for all 1 ď i ď |x|.
The following lemma is needed in the proof of Thm. 1.
p ∆y be a visibly pushdown grammar for a program
Lemma 4.4. Let GP “ xΞ, Θ,
P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y, let x “ x1 ¨ . . . ¨ xn be the tuple of variables in P, and let
HK “ xquery 0 , . . . , query K y be the program defined by Algorithm 2. Given a
nonterminal Q P Ξ, corresponding to a non-final control state q P nFpPq, γ P ∆˚ ,
21
Algorithm 2: proc query k pX, xI , xO q for 1 ď k ď K
begin
var xJ , xK , xL ;
var PC, τ, y, z ;
asgnk
PC Ð X ;
0:
startk :
goto prodka or prodkb or prodkc ;
k
proda :
havoc (τ );
assume πa pPC, τ q;
/* Q Ñ τ */
asgnk
assume ρτ pxI , xO q;
a:
return;
prodk
havoc (τ, y);
b:
assume πb pPC, τ, yq;
/* Q Ñ τ Q1 */
havoc (xJ );
assume ρτ pxI , xJ q;
xI Ð xJ ;
asgnk
PC Ð y;
b:
goto startk ;
k
prodc :
havoc (τ, y, z);
1
assume πc pPC, x τ, y, τ y , zq;
/* QÑxxτ Qinit
j τ y Q */
havoc (xJ , xK , xL );
assume ρx τ pxI , xJ q ;
/* call relation */
assume ρτ y pxK , xL q ;
/* return relation */
assume φτ pxI , xL q ;
/* frame relation */
ndetk :
goto swapk or asgnkc ;
swapk :
swap(y, z);
swap(xJ , xL );
swap(xK , xO );
asgnk
:
xI Ð xL ;
c
PC Ð z;
query k´1 py, xJ , xK q;
goto startk ;
end
22
Example
call query
4.4. Let
2
us
consider
pQinit
1 , p 1 0 q, p 1 2 qq
an
following
pa
4
execution
Qinit
1
c
pb
1 p2
ùñ
of
query
for
the
τ1 x τ2 Qinit
τ2 y Q 3
1
ùñ
pa
3
τ1 x τ2 Qinit
τ2 y τ3 ùñ τ1 x τ2 τ4 τ2 y τ4 .
1
In the table below, the first row (labelled
PC) gives the value of local variable PC when control hits the labelled statement
given at the second row (labelled ip). The third row (labelled xI {xO ) represents
the content of the two arrays. xI {xO “ p a b qp c d q says that, in xI , x has value
a and z has value b; in xO , x has value c and z has value d.
PC
Qinit
´
Q2
´
´
1
ip
start2
prod2b ppb1 q
start2
prod2c ppc2 q
swap2
xI {xO p 1 0 qp 1 2 q p 1 0 qp 1 2 q p 1 0 qp 1 2 q p 1 0 qp 1 2 q p 1 0 qp 1 2 q
PC
Q3
´
Qinit
´
1
1
ip
start1
proda ppa3 q
start2
prod2a ppa4 q
xI {xO p 1 0 qp 1 2 q p 1 0 qp 1 2 q p 0 0 qp 42 0 q p 0 0 qp 42 0 q
The execution of query 2 pQinit
1 , p 1 0 q, p 1 2 qq starts on row 1, column 1 and proceeds until the call to query 1 pQ3 , p 1 0 q, p 1 2 qq at row 2, column 1 (the out
of order case). The latter ends at row 2, column 2, where the execution of
query 2 pQinit
1 , p 1 0 q, p 1 2 qq resumes. Since the execution is out of order, and
the previous havocpxJ , xK , xL q results into xJ “ p 0 0 q, xK “ p 42 0 q and
xL “ p 1 0 q (this choice complies with the call relation), the values of xI {xO are
updated to p 0 0 q{p 42 0 q.
p ˚ , and 1 ď k ď K, such that Q ùùγùñ w, we have:
wPΘ
df pkq
JγK “
!`
)
˘
IÓxI ¨xO rx ¨ x{xI ¨ xO s | I ¨ O P JSC kQ pγqK
K
where JγK Ď Zxˆx and JSC kQ pγqK Ď ZVH .
Proof. By induction on |γ| ą 0, applying a case split on the type of the first
production in γ.
The following theorem summarizes the first major result in this paper, namely
that any K-index underapproximation of the semantics of a recursive program
P can be computed by looking at the semantics of a non-recursive program HK ,
obtained from P by a syntactic source-to-source transformation.
Theorem 1. Let P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y be a program, x “ x1 ¨ . . . ¨ xn be the
tuple of variables in P, and let q P nFpPi q be a non-final control state of
out
init
Pi “ xxi , xin
, Fi , ∆i y. Moreover, let HK “ xquery 0 , . . . , query K y
i , xi , Si , qi
be the program defined by Algorithm 2. For any 1 ď k ď K, we have:
r
r
JPKpkq
q “ txpI ÓxI rx{xI sqÓxi , pI ÓxO rx{xO sqÓxi y |
r P JHK Kquery k , IpXq
r
Ir ¨ O
“ Qu .
p ∆y be the visibly pushdown grammar corresponding to
Proof. Let GP “ xΞ, Θ,
P. By definition, we have
!
)
Ť
γ
JPKpkq
“
xIÓ
,
OÓ
y
|
I
¨
O
P
JγK
xi
xi
q
Qù
ùùñw
df pkq
23
γ
”Ď” Let Q ùùùñ w be a derivation of GP , and I ¨ O P JγK be a tuple from Zxˆx .
df pkq
γ
By Lemma 4.2, rQs Ý
Ñ 0 is a path in Adf pkq pGP q, and by Lemma 4.3, SC kQ pγq is
a feasible interprocedurally valid path of query k pQq. By´ Lemma¯4.4, there exists
rO
r such that Ir ¨ O
r P JSC k pγqK, and I ¨ O “ IÓ
r x ¨x rx ¨ x{xI ¨ xO s.
tuples I,
Q
I
O
We obtain thus I “ Ir ÓxI rx{xI s and O “ Ir ÓxO rx{xO s.
k
rO
r P ZVquery
r P JHK Kquery k and IpXq
r
”Ě” Let I,
, such that Ir ¨ O
“ Q. Then
there exists a feasible interprocedurally valid path π of query k pQq, such that
r P JπK. By Lemma 4.3, there exists a control word γ P ∆˚ , such that
Ir ¨ O
´
¯
γ
r x ¨x rx ¨ x{xI ¨ xO s P JγK. By
rQs Ý
Ñ 0 and π “ SC kQ pγq. By Lemma 4.4, IÓ
I
O
γ
Lemma 4.2, we have that Q ùùùñ w is a derivation of GP . We can conclude
df pkq
that xpIr ÓxI rx{xI sqÓxi , pIr ÓxO rx{xO sqÓxi y P JPKq .
As a last point, we observe that the bounded-index sequence tJPKpkq u8
k“1
satisfies several conditions that advocate its use in program analysis, as an
underapproximation sequence. The subset order and set union is extended to
tuples of relations, point-wise.
JPKpkq Ď JPKpk`1q
for all k ě 1 pA1q
Ť8
pkq
JPK
“
JPK
pA2q
k“1
Condition (A1) requires that the sequence is monotonically increasing, the limit
of this increasing sequence being the actual semantics of the program (A2). These
conditions follow however immediately from the two first points of Lemma 4.1.
To decide whether the limit JPK has been reached by some iterate JPKpkq , it is
enough to check that the tuple of relations in JPKpkq is inductive with respect to
the statements of P. This can be implemented as an SMT query.
5
Completeness of Index-Bounded Underapproximations for Bounded Programs
In this section we define a class of recursive programs for which the precise
summary semantics of each program in that class is effectively computable. We
show for each program P in the class that (a) JPK “ JPKpkq for some value k ě 1,
bounded by a linear function in the total number locpPq of control states in P,
and moreover (b) the semantics of Hk is effectively computable (and so is that
of JPKpkq by Thm. 1).
Ť8
Given an integer relation R Ď Zn ˆ Zn , its transitive closure R` “ i“1 Ri ,
where R1 “ R and Ri`1 “ Ri ˝ R, for all i ě 1. In general, the transitive closure
of a relation is not definable within decidable subsets of integer arithmetic, such
as Presburger arithmetic. In this section we consider two classes of relations,
called periodic, for which this is possible, namely octagonal relations, and finite
monoid affine relations.
Octagonal relation An octagonal relation is defined by a finite conjunction of
constraints of the form ˘x ˘ y ď c, where x and y range over the set x Y x1 ,
and c is an integer constant. The transitive closure of any octagonal relation
has been shown to be Presburger definable and effectively computable [8].
24
Linear affine relation A linear affine relation is defined by a formula Rpx, x1 q ”
Cx ě d ^ x1 “ Ax ` b, where A P Znˆn , C P Zpˆn are matrices and
b P Zn , d P Zp . R is said to have the finite monoid property if and only if
the set tAi | i ě 0u is finite. It is known that the finite monoid condition
is decidable [7], and moreover that the transitive closure of a finite monoid
affine relation is Presburger definable and effectively computable [12, 7].
We define a bounded-expression b to be a regular expression of the form
b “ w1˚ . . . wd˚ , where d ě 1 and each wi is a non-empty word. A language (not
necessarily context-free) L over alphabet Σ is said to be bounded if and only if L
is included in (the language of) a bounded expression b.
Theorem 2 ([21]). Let G “ pΞ, Σ, ∆q be a grammar, and X P Ξ be a nonterminal, such that LX pGq is bounded. Then there exists a linear function B : N Ñ N
pkq
such that LX pGq “ LX pGq for some 1 ď k ď Bp||Ξ||q.
If the grammar in question is GP , for a program P, then clearly ||Ξ|| is
bounded by the number of control locations in P, by the definition of GP . The
class of programs for which our method is complete is defined below:
p ∆q be its corresponding
Definition 2. Let P be a program and GP “ pΞ, Θ,
visibly pushdown grammar. Then P is said to be bounded periodic if and only if:
1. LX pGP q is bounded for each X P Ξ;
p is periodic.
2. each relation ρτ occurring in the program, for some τ P Θ,
p2q
Example 5.1. (continued from Ex. 4.1) Recall that LQinit
pGP q “ L init pGP q
`
˘n `
˘n
` 1 ˘˚ ˚ ` Q1˘˚
which equals to the set t τ1 x τ2 τ4 τ2 y τ3 | n ě 0u Ď τ1 τ2 x τ4 τ2 y τ3 .
Concerning condition 1, it is decidable [14] and previous work [16] defined a
class of programs following a recursion scheme which ensures boundedness of
the set of interprocedurally valid paths.
This section shows that the underapproximation sequence tJPKpkq u8
k“1 , defined in Section 4, when applied to any bounded periodic programs P, always
yields JPK in at most BplocpPqq steps, and moreover each iterate JPKpkq is computable and Presburger definable. Furthermore the method can be applied as
it is to bounded periodic programs, without prior knowledge of the bounded
expression b Ě LQ pGP q.
The proof goes as follows. Because P is bounded periodic, Thm. 2 shows
that the semantics JPK of P coincide with its k-index semantics JPKpkq for some
1 ď k ď BplocpPqq. Hence, the result of Thm. 1 shows that for each q P nFpPq,
pkq
the k-index semantics JPKq “ txIÓxI , IÓxO y | I ¨ O P JHK Kquery k , IpXq “ Qu,
pkq
that is, the semantics JPKq is computed from that of procedure query k called
with X “ Q. Then, because P is bounded, we show in Thm. 3 that every
procedure query k of program H is flattable (Def. 3). Moreover, since the only
transitions of H which are not from P are equalities and havoc, all transitions of
H are periodic. Since each procedure query k is flattable then JPK is computable
in finite time by existing tools, such as Fast [6] or Flata [9, 8]. In fact, these
tools are guaranteed to terminate provided that (a) the input program is flattable;
and (b) loops are labelled with periodic relations.
Definition 3. Let P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y be a non-recursive program and GP “
p ∆q be its corresponding visibly pushdown grammar. Procedure Pi is said
pΞ, Θ,
25
to be flattable if and only
if there exists a bounded and regular language R over
p such that JPKP “ Ť
Θ,
i
αPLP pGP qXR JαK.
i
Notice that a flattable program is not necessarily bounded (Def. 2), but its
semantics can be computed by looking only at a bounded subset of interprocedurally valid paths.
The proof that the procedures query k are flattable relies on grammar based
reasoning, and, in particular, on control-sets with relative completeness properties.
Let us now turn to our main result, Theorem 3 stated next, whose proof is
organized as follows. First, Proposition 2 roughly states that provided LpGq is
bounded, then a bounded subset of the k-index depth-first derivations suffices to
capture Lpkq pGq for some k. The proof of this proposition is split into Theorem 4,
Lemma 5.1 and Lemma 5.2. The rest of the proof uses Lemma 4.3 which
roughly states that there is a well-behaved mapping from the k-index depth-first
derivations of GP from Q to the runs of query k pQq for every value of k and Q.
Theorem 3. Let P “ xP1 , . . . , Pn y be a bounded program, then, for any k ě 1,
procedure query k of program H is flattable.
5.1
Bounded languages with bounded control sets
The following result was proved in [13]:
Theorem 4 (Thm. 1 from [13], also in [20]). For every regular language L over
alphabet Σ there exists a bounded expression bΓ such that P kΣ pLXbΓ q “ P kΣ pLq.
Next we prove a result characterizing a subset of derivations sufficient to
capture a bounded context-free language. But first, given a grammar G “
pΞ, Σ, ∆q and X P Ξ define
df pkq
ΓX
df pkq
Observe that ΓX
tomaton.
γ
“ tγ P ∆˚ | rXs Ý
Ñ 0 in Adf pkq u .
is a regular language, because Adf pkq is a finite state au-
Lemma 5.1. Let G “ pΞ, Σ, ∆q be a grammar and X P Ξ be a nonterminal, such that for all p P ∆, X does not occur in tail ppq. Also LX pGq Ď
pa1 w1 q˚ . . . pad wd q˚ where a1 , . . . , ad are distinct symbols of Σ none of which
occurs in w1 ¨ ¨ ¨ wd . Then, for each k ě 1 there exists a bounded expression bΓ
pkq
df pkq
over ∆ such that LX pGq “ L̂X pbΓ X ΓX , Gq.
Proof. We first establish the claim that for each k ě 1, there exists a bounded
expression bΓ over ∆ such that P k∆ pΓdf pkq XbΓ q “ P k∆ pΓdf pkq q. By Corollary 1,
Γdf pkq is a regular language, and by Theorem 4, there exists a bounded expression
bΓ over ∆ such that P k∆ pΓdf pkq X bΓ q “ P k∆ pΓdf pkq q which proves the claim.
Define A “ ta1 , . . . , ad u and assume ∆ is given as a linearly ordered set of
γ
m productions tp1 , . . . , pm u. Then for u such that X ñ
ù u, we have P kA puq “
P k∆ pγq ˆ Π where Π is the matrix of m rows and d columns where row i
is given by P kA ptail ppi qq. Next, let γ1 , γ2 be two control words such that
P k∆ pγ1 q “ P k∆ pγ2 q and each γi (i “ 1, 2) generates a word ui of LX pGq, that is
γi
X ùñ ui . We conclude from the above that P kA pu1 q “ P kA pu2 q. Moreover, the
26
assumption LX pGq Ď pa1 w1 q˚ . . . pad wd q˚ where a1 , . . . , ad are distinct symbols
shows that u1 ÓA “ u2 ÓA . Furthermore, because no symbol of A occurs in
w1 ¨ ¨ ¨ wd we find that u1 “ u2 .
df pkq
pkq
pkq
To show LX pGq “ L̂X pbΓ X ΓX , Gq we prove that LX pGq Ď L̂X pbΓ X
df pkq
ΓX , Gq the other direction being immediate because of Proposition 1 which
pkq
says that LX pGq “ L̂X pΓdf pkq , Gq and because only those control words γ such
that head ppγq1 q “ X matters.
γ
df pkq
So, let u P L̂X pΓX , Gq be a word, and X ùùùñ u be a depth-first derivation
df pkq
P k∆ pΓX
df pkq
df pkq
P k∆ pΓX q, there
of u. Since
X bΓ q “
exists a control word
β P Γdf pkq X bΓ such that P k∆ pβq “ P k∆ pγq. Also because no production
p P ∆ is such that tail ppq contains an occurrence of X, we find that pβq1 “ pγq1 .
Finally, Lemma 3.1 shows that given β P Γdf pkq , there exist a (unique) word u1
β
such that X ùùùñ u1 , hence u1 “ u as shown above.
df pkq
For the rest of this section, let G “ pΞ, Θ, ∆q be a visibly pushdown grammar
(we ignore for the time being the distinction between tagged and untagged
alphabet symbols), and X0 P Ξ be an arbitrarily chosen nonterminal.
Let b “ w1˚ ¨ ¨ ¨ wd˚ be a bounded expression 6 over alphabet Θ and define
r “ pa1 w1 q˚ . . . pad wd q˚ such that ta1 , . . . , ad u and
the bounded expression b
r
Θ are disjoint. Next, let `i “ |ai wi | for every 1 ď i ď d and let Gb “
r
r
pΞb , Θ Y ta1 , . . . , ad u, δ b q be the regular grammar where
!
)
r
psq
Ξb “
qr | 1 ď s ď d ^ 1 ď r ď `s
!
)
r
psq
psq
δb “
qi Ñ pas ws qi qi`1 | 1 ď s ď d ^ 1 ď i ă `s Y
!
)
psq
ps1 q
q`s Ñ pas ws q`s q1 | 1 ď s ď s1 ď d .
psq
pxq
r holds is routine.
Checking tw | q1 ñ˚ w q1 for some 1ďsďxďdu “ Lpbq
r
b
’
’
Next, given G and G , define G “ pΞ , Θ Y ta1 , . . . , ad u, ∆’ q such that
r 7
LX ’ pG’ q “ LX0 pGq k Lpbq.
0
)
( ! psq
r
pxq
psq
pxq
• Ξ’ “ X0’ Y rqr Xqy s | X P Ξ, qr , qy P Ξb , s ď x
• ∆’ is the set containing for every 1 ď s ď x ď d a production X0’ Ñ
psq
pxq
rq1 X0 q1 s, and:
– for every production X Ñ γ P ∆, ∆’ has a production
pxq
b
if qpsq
;
r Ñ γ qy P ∆
pxq
rqpsq
r Xqy s Ñ γ
r
6 Recall
(1)
that each wi is a non-empty word.
˚
two languages L1 Ď Σ˚
1 and L2 Ď Σ2 their asynchronous product, denoted L1 k L2 ,
is the language L over the alphabet Σ “ Σ1 Y Σ2 such that w P L iff the projections of w to
Σ1 and Σ2 belong to L1 and L2 , respectively. Observe that the L1 k L2 depends on L1 , L2
and also their underlying alphabet Σ1 and Σ2 .
7 Given
27
– for every production X Ñ γ Y P ∆, ∆’ has a production
pzq
pxq
pxq
rqpsq
r Xqy s Ñ γ rqt Y qy s
pzq
if qpsq
r Ñ γ qt
P ∆b ; (2)
r
– for every production X Ñ τ Z σ Y P ∆, ∆’ has a production
pzq
p`q
pxq
puq
pxq
rqpsq
r Xqy s Ñ τ rqt Zqv s σ rqk Y qy s
pzq
if qpsq
r Ñ τ qt
psq
p`q
b
P ∆b and qpuq
v Ñ σ qk P ∆ ; (3)
r
puq
– for every production q1 Ñ as qv
r
P δ b , ∆’ has a production
r
psq
puq
pxq
rq1 Xqpxq
y s Ñ as rqv Xqy s .
(4)
∆’ has no other production.
psq
pxq
Next we define the mapping ξ which maps each nonterminal rqr Xqy s P Ξ’
onto X, X0’ onto X0 , every ai , 1 ď i ď d, onto ε and maps any other terminal
(Θ) onto itself. Then ξ is naturally extended to words over Θ Y ta1 , . . . , ad u Y Ξ’ .
Next we lift ξ to productions of ∆’ such that the mapping of a production is
defined by the mapping of its head and tail. The lifting of ξ to sequences of
productions and sets of sequences of productions is defined in the obvious way.
From the above definition we observe that given a derivation D’ ” X0’ ñ
psq
pxq
rq1 X0 q1 s ùñ˚ w in G’ , ξ maps D’ onto a derivation of G of the form
X0 ñ X0 ùñ˚ wÓΘ .
Lemma 5.2. Let G “ pΞ, Θ, ∆q be a visibly pushdown grammar, X0 P Ξ be a
nonterminal such that LX0 pGq Ď b for a bounded expression b “ w1˚ . . . wd˚ . Let
ta1 , . . . , ad u be a set of d symbols disjoint from Θ. Then for every k ě 1, the
following hold:
1. Let i1 , . . . , id P N we have
pkq
pkq
w1i1 . . . wdid P LX0 pGq iff pa1 w1 qi1 . . . pad wd qid P LX ’ pG’ q ;
0
2. Given a control set Γ over ∆’ such that
pkq
L̂X ’ pΓ X Γdf pkq pG’ q, G’ q “ LX ’ pG’ q
0
0
then the control set Γ1 “ ξpΓq over ∆ satisfies
pkq
L̂X0 pΓ1 X Γdf pkq pGq, Gq “ LX0 pGq .
Proof. The proof of point 1 is by induction. As customary, we show the following stronger statement: let k ě 1 and w P pΘ Y ta1 , . . . , ad uq˚ ¨ Θ, we have
puq
puq
psq
psq
rqr Xqv s ùñ˚ w iff qr ñ˚ w qv and X ùñ˚ wÓΘ . The proof of the if
pkq
pkq
psq
qr
puq
direction is by induction on the length of
ñ˚ w qv .
r
psq
puq
b
i “ 1. Then qr Ñ τ qv P ∆ . Two cases can occur: (i) τ P Θ; or (ii) τ P
ta1 , . . . , ad u.
28
In case (i), we conclude from X ùñ˚ wÓΘ that w“w ÓΘ “τ and X Ñ τ P ∆,
pkq
psq
puq
rqr Xqv s
hence that
psq
’
puq
Ñ τ P ∆ , and finally that rqr Xqv s ùñ˚ w. Case
pkq
(ii) is not allowed since w must end with a symbol in Θ.
w
hnlj
psq
ps1 q
puq
i ą 1. Then qr ñ τ qr1 ñ ˝ ñ˚ τ y qv . As seen previously, two cases
can occur: (i) τ P ta1 , . . . , ad u; or (ii) τ P Θ. In case (i), because w “ τ y and
τ R Θ we find that X ùñ˚ wÓΘ “ yÓΘ . Hence the induction hypothesis shows
pkq
that
ps1 q
puq
rqr1 Xqv s
ps1 q
psq
˚
puq
ùñ y. Finally the definition of G’ shows that rqr Xqv s Ñ
pkq
puq
puq
psq
τ rqr1 Xqv s P ∆’ , hence that rqr Xqv s
1
ps q
puq
ùñ˚ τ rqr1 Xqv s ùñ˚ τ y “ w and we are done.
pkq
pkq
For case (ii) (τ P Θ), we do a (sub)case analysis according to the first
production rule used in the derivation X ùñ˚ wÓΘ .
pkq
psq
• X Ñ τ . Then X ùñ˚ wÓΘ “ τ . On the other hand qr
pkq
ps1 q
ñ τ qr1
ñ
puq
˝ ñ˚ τ y qv and our assumption on w “ τ y shows that y ends with a
symbol in Θ. Hence a contradiction since wÓΘ “ τ does not coincide with
the projection of w “ τ y.
psq
• X Ñ τ Y . Then X ùñ τ Y ùñ˚ τ yÓΘ “ wÓΘ . Also qr
pkq
pkq
ps1 q
ñ τ qr1
ñ
puq
˝ ñ˚ τ y qv . The induction hypothesis applied on Y ùñ˚ yÓΘ and
pkq
ps1 q
puq
qr1 ñ˚ y qv
ps1 q
puq
shows that rqr1 Y qv s ùñ˚ y. Finally, X Ñ τ Y P ∆ and
pkq
r
ps1 q
psq
puq
b
Ñ τ qr1 P ∆ show that rqr Xqv s Ñ τ
psq
puq
ps1 q
puq
that rqr Xqv s ùñ˚ τ rqr1 Y qv s ùñ˚ τ y “
pkq
pkq
psq
qr
ps1 q
puq
rqr1 Y qv s P ∆’ , hence
w and we are done.
• X Ñ τ X1 σ X2 . Then X ùñ τ X1 σ X2 ùñ˚ τ w1 ÓΘ σ w2 ÓΘ “ wÓΘ .
pkq
puq
prq
pkq
Moreover, since qs ñ˚ w qv and τ, σ P Θ we find that there exist
prq
pbq
pb1 q
pdq
puq
qs ñ τ qa ñ˚ τ w1 qa1 ñ τ w1 σ qc ñ˚ τ w1 σ w2 qv . Hence, the
definition of G’ shows that
pb1 q
puq
pbq
pdq
puq
rqprq
s Xqv s Ñ τ rqa X1 qa1 s σ rqc X2 qv s .
On the other hand, since X1 X2 ùñ˚ w1 ÓΘ w2 ÓΘ (simply delete τ and
pkq
σ), Lemma 4.1 shows that either X1 ùùùñ˚ w1 ÓΘ and X2 ùñ˚ w2 ÓΘ ;
pk´1q
pkq
or X1 ùñ˚ w1 ÓΘ and X2 ùùùñ˚ w2 ÓΘ . Let us assume the latter holds
pkq
pk´1q
(the other being treated similarly). Applying the induction hypothepbq
pb1 q
pdq
puq
sis, we find that rqa X1 qa1 s ùñ˚ w1 and rqc X2 qv s ùùùñ˚ w2 ,
pkq
prq
pk´1q
puq
hence we conclude the case with the k-index derivation rqs Xqv s ùñ˚
pkq
τ
pbq
pb1 q
pdq
puq
rqa X1 qa1 s σ rqc X2 qv s
˚
ùñ τ
pkq
29
pbq
pb1 q
rqa X1 qa1 s σ w2
˚
ùñ τ w1 σ w2 .
pkq
The “only if” direction is proved similarly, this time by induction on the length
psq
puq
of the derivation rqr Xqv s ùñ˚ w.
pkq
For the proof of point 2 the “Ď” direction is obvious by definition of depth-first
derivations. For the reverse direction “Ě” point 1 combined with the assumption
shows that for every i1 , . . . , id P N the following equivalence holds:
pkq
w1i1 . . . wdid P LX0 pGq
iff
pa1 w1 qi1 . . . pad wd qid P L̂X ’ pΓ X Γdf pkq , G’ q .
0
So let D ” X0’ ùñ˚ w be a depth-first k-index derivation of G’ with control
pkq
word conforming to Γ. Now consider ξpDq, it defines again a depth-first k-index
derivation except that this time the control word conforms to ξpΓq. Further, the
definition of ξ shows that the word generated by ξpDq results from deleting the
symbols ta1 , . . . , ad u from w “ pa1 w1 qi1 ¨ ¨ ¨ pad wd qid . To conclude, observe that
pkq
w1i1 ¨ ¨ ¨ wdid P LX0 pGq and we are done.
pkq
The following proposition shows that LQ pGP q is captured by a subset of
depth-first derivations whose control words belong to some bounded expression.
p ∆q be a visibly pushdown grammar, X0 P Ξ be
Proposition 2. Let G “ pΞ, Θ,
a nonterminal such that LX0 pGq is bounded. Then for each k ě 1 there exists a
pkq
bounded expression bΓ over ∆ such that L̂X0 pbΓ X Γdf pkq , Gq “ LX0 pGq.
Proof. Since LX0 pGq is bounded there exists a bounded expression b “ w1˚ . . . wd˚
such that LX0 pGq Ď b.
Next, define ta1 , . . . , ad u be an alphabet disjoint from Θ. Lemma 5.2
pkq
shows that for every i1 , . . . , id P N the equivalence w1i1 . . . wdid P LX0 pGq iff
pkq
pkq
0
0
pa1 w1 qi1 . . . pad wd qid P LX ’ pG’ q holds. Next, applying Lemma 5.1 on LX ’ pG’ q
(whose assumptions holds by definition of G’ ) we obtain a bounded expression
pkq
bΓ’ over ∆’ such that L̂X ’ pbΓ’ X Γdf pkq , G’ q “ LX ’ pG’ q. Our next step
0
0
pkq
is to apply the results of Lemma 5.2 (second point) to obtain that LX0 pGq “
L̂X0 pξpbΓ’ q X Γdf pkq q, Gq. Finally, since bΓ’ is a bounded expression, and ξ is an
homomorphism we have that ξpbΓ’ q is bounded (see Lem. 5.3), hence included
in a bounded expression and we are done by setting bΓ to ξpbΓ’ q.
5.2
Proof of Theorem 3
We recall two results from Ginsburg [14].
Theorem 5 (Theorem 3.3.2, [14]). Each gsm mapping preserves regular sets.
Lemma 5.3 (Lemma 5.5.3, [14]). Spw1˚ . . . wn˚ q is bounded for each gsm S and
all words w1 , . . . , wn .
And finally, the proof that query k is flattable.
30
#
identity 210
leq
152
parity
384
plus
462
times2
210
k“2
t
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.53
0.14
fp
no
no
no
no
no
#
330
240
606
728
330
k“3
t
0.22
0.27
0.54
2.54
0.35
fp
yes
no
no
no
yes
k“4
t
328
0.41
828
1.31
994
9.20
#
fp
yes
yes
yes
Table 1: Experiments with recursive implementations of basic arithmetic functions and predicates [1].
of Theorem. 3. Since P is bounded periodic we can apply Proposition 2 showing
the existence of a bounded expression bΓ over ∆ such that L̂Q pbΓ XΓdf pkq , GP q “
Ť
pkq
pkq
LQ pGP q. Hence we find that JPKq coincides with αPLpkq pGP q JαK which in
Q
Ť
turn is equal to αPL̂Q pbΓ XΓdf pkq ,GP q JαK.
γ
Lemma 3.2 shows that for all control word γ P ∆˚ such that Q ù
ñ α we
df
(
have that JγK “ I ¨ O | xIÓxi , OÓxi y P JαK . This enables the use of Lemma 4.3
showing that such control word γ is such that JγK “ JSC kQ pγqK. This is saying
the semantics of γ in P can be obtained by computing that of SC kQ pγq in query k .
We then conclude from Lem. 5.3 and Thm. 5, that SCkQ pbΓ q is a bounded
and regular language. Back to JHKquery k , we find that
Ť
Ť
JHKquery k “ αPL k pGH q JαK “ αPL k pGH qXSCk pbΓ q JαK
query
query
Q
and that JHKquery k is flattable since SCkQ pbΓ q is a bounded regular set.
6
Experiments
We have implemented the proposed method in the Flata verifier [17] and
experimented with several benchmarks. The Flata tool is publicly available8
and the benchmarks used in this section are given in the repository. First,
we have considered several programs from external sources [1], that compute
arithmetic functions or predicates in a recursive way such as identity (identity),
plus (addition), times2 (multiplication by two), leq (comparison), and parity
(parity checking). It is worth noting that all of these programs have bounded
index visibly pushdown grammars, i.e. LpGP q is of bounded index, for each
program P P tidentity, plus, times2, leq, parityu, the stabilization of the
under-approximation sequence is thus guaranteed. For all our benchmarks,
the condition that the tuple of relation JPKpkq is inductive with respect to the
statements of P is met for k ď 3. Table 1 shows the results, giving the size
(#) of each under-approximation query k (the number of transitions) and the
time (t) needed to compute its summary (in seconds). The column fp indicates
whether the fixpoint check was successful. The platform used for all experiments
is MacBookPro with Intel Core i7 2, 3 GHz with 16 GB of RAM.
Next, we have considered two generalizations of the McCarthy 91 function
[10], a well-known verification benchmark that has long been a challenge. We
have automatically computed precise summaries of its generalizations Fa (Table
8 https://github.com/filipkonecny/flata
31
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
k“2
t
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.07
0.08
0.08
#
32
72
128
200
288
392
512
648
"
Fa pxq “
fp
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
#
50
114
204
320
462
630
824
1044
k“3
t
0.07
0.74
0.30
0.44
0.63
0.82
0.86
1.09
fp
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
x ´ 10
pFa qa px ` 10 ¨ a ´ 9q
#
68
156
280
440
636
868
1136
1440
k“4
t
0.09
1.55
1.59
4.02
5.97
7.54
14.23
12.87
fp
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
if x ě 101
if x ď 100
Table 2: Generalized McCarthy Fa Experiments. The function F2 is the original
McCarthy91 function.
G11
G12
G13
G14
#
72
72
72
72
k“2
t
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.08
fp
no
no
no
no
"
Gb pxq “
#
114
114
114
114
k“3
t
0.74
1.53
5.07
7.07
x ´ 10
GpGpx ` bqq
fp
no
no
no
no
#
156
156
156
156
k“4
t
1.55
n/a
n/a
n/a
fp
yes
?
?
?
if x ě 101
if x ď 100
Table 3: Generalized McCarthy Gb Experiments. The function G11 is the original
McCarthy91 function.
32
G11 pxq
G12 pxq
G13 pxq
G14 pxq
91
if x ď 100
x ´ 10 if x ě 101
91
if x ď 100 and 2|x ` 1
92
if x ď 100 and 2|x
x ´ 10 if x ě 101
91
if x ď 100 and 3|x ` 1
92
if x ď 100 and 3|x
93
if x ď 100 and 3|x ` 2
x ´ 10 if x ě 101
91
if x ď 100 and 4|x ` 3
92
if x ď 100 and 4|x ` 2
93
if x ď 100 and 4|x ` 1
94
x ď 100 and 4|x
x ´ 10 if x ě 101
Table 4: Automatically computed summaries for the generalized McCarthy Gb
functions (for index k “ 3).
2) and Gb (Table 3) above for a “ 2, . . . , 8 and b “ 12, 13, 14. For the Fa
functions, the computed summaries are given by:
"
91
if x ď 100
Fa pxq “
for all a “ 1, . . . , 8 .
x ´ 10 if x ě 101
The computed summaries for the Gb functions are given in Table 4.
The visibly pushdown grammars corresponding to the recursive programs
implementing the Fa , Gb functions are not bounded. In the case of the Fa
function, the under-approximation sequence reaches a fixpoint after 4 iterations.
In the case of Gb , for b “ 12, 13, 14, the summary of query 3 is the expected
result. However, due to the limitations of the Flata tool, which is based on an
acceleration procedure without abstraction, we could not compute the summary
of query 4 , and we could not verify automatically that the fixpoint has been
reached.
7
Conclusions
We have presented an underapproximation method for computing summaries
of recursive programs operating on integers. The underapproximation is driven
by bounding the index of derivations that produce the execution traces of the
program, and computing the summary, for each index, by analyzing a nonrecursive program. We also present a class of programs on which our method is
complete. Finally, we report on an implementation and experimental evaluation
of our technique.
Acknowledgements. Pierre Ganty is supported by the EU FP7 2007–2013
program under agreement 610686 POLCA, by the Madrid Regional Government
under CM project S2013/ICE-2731 (N-Greens) and RISCO: RIgorous analysis
of Sophisticated COncurrent and distributed systems, funded by the Spanish
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness No. TIN2015-71819-P (2016–2018).
Pierre thanks Thomas Reps for pointing out inconsistencies in the examples.
33
References
[1] Termination Competition 2011. http://termcomp.uibk.ac.at/termcomp/
home.seam.
[2] A. Albarghouthi, A. Gurfinkel, and M. Chechik. Whale: An interpolationbased algorithm for inter-procedural verification. In VMCAI ’12, volume
7148 of LNCS, pages 39–55. Springer, 2012.
[3] R. Alur and P. Madhusudan. Adding nesting structure to words. JACM,
56(3):16, 2009.
[4] M. F. Atig and P. Ganty. Approximating petri net reachability along
context-free traces. In FSTTCS ’11, volume 13 of LIPIcs, pages 152–163.
Schloss Dagstuhl, 2011.
[5] A. P. B. Cook and A. Rybalchenko. Summarization for termination: no
return! Formal Methods in System Design, 35:369–387, 2009.
[6] S. Bardin, A. Finkel, J. Leroux, and L. Petrucci. Fast: Fast acceleration
of symbolic transition systems. In CAV ’03, volume 2725 of LNCS, pages
118–121. Springer, 2003.
[7] B. Boigelot. Symbolic Methods for Exploring Infinite State Spaces. PhD
thesis, University of Liège, 1998.
[8] M. Bozga, R. Iosif, and F. Konečný. Fast acceleration of ultimately periodic
relations. In CAV ’10, volume 6174 of LNCS, pages 227–242. Springer, 2010.
[9] M. Bozga, R. Iosif, and Y. Lakhnech. Flat parametric counter automata.
Fundamenta Informaticae, 91(2):275–303, 2009.
[10] J. Cowles. Knuth’s generalization of mccarthy’s 91 function. In ComputerAided reasoning: ACL2 case studies, pages 283–299. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 2000.
[11] J. Esparza, S. Kiefer, and M. Luttenberger. Newtonian program analysis.
JACM, 57(6):33:1–33:47, 2010.
[12] A. Finkel and J. Leroux. How to compose presburger-accelerations: Applications to broadcast protocols. In FSTTCS ’02, volume 2556 of LNCS,
pages 145–156. Springer, 2002.
[13] P. Ganty, R. Majumdar, and B. Monmege. Bounded underapproximations.
Formal Methods in System Design, 40(2):206–231, 2012.
[14] S. Ginsburg. The Mathematical Theory of Context-Free Languages. McGrawHill, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1966.
[15] P. Godefroid, A. V. Nori, S. K. Rajamani, and S. Tetali. Compositional maymust program analysis: unleashing the power of alternation. In POPL ’10,
pages 43–56. ACM, 2010.
[16] G. Godoy and A. Tiwari. Invariant checking for programs with procedure
calls. In SAS ’09, volume 5673 of LNCS, pages 326–342. Springer, 2009.
34
[17] H. Hojjat, F. Konečný, F. Garnier, R. Iosif, V. Kuncak, and P. Rümmer. A
verification toolkit for numerical transition systems - tool paper. In FM,
pages 247–251, 2012.
[18] D. Kroening, M. Lewis, and G. Weissenbacher. Under-approximating loops
in C programs for fast counterexample detection. In CAV ’13: Proc. 23rd
Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Verification, LNCS, pages 381–396. Springer,
2013.
[19] G. Lalire, M. Argoud, and B. Jeannet.
Interproc.
//pop-art.inrialpes.fr/people/bjeannet/bjeannet-forge/
interproc/index.html.
http:
[20] M. Latteux. Mots infinis et langages commutatifs. Informatique Théorique
et Applications, 12(3), 1978.
[21] M. Luker. A family of languages having only finite-index grammars. Information and Control, 39(1):14–18, 1978.
[22] M. Luker. Control sets on grammars using depth-first derivations. Mathematical Systems Theory, 13:349–359, 1980.
[23] T. Reps, S. Horwitz, and M. Sagiv. Precise interprocedural dataflow analysis
via graph reachability. In POPL ’95, pages 49–61. ACM, 1995.
[24] M. Sharir and A. Pnueli. Two approaches to interprocedural data flow
analysis. In Program Flow Analysis: Theory and Applications, chapter 7,
pages 189–233. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1981.
35
| 6cs.PL
|
Local Distributed Algorithms in Highly Dynamic
Networks
arXiv:1802.10199v1 [cs.DS] 27 Feb 2018
Philipp Bamberger · University of Freiburg · [email protected]
Fabian Kuhn1 · University of Freiburg · [email protected]
Yannic Maus1 · University of Freiburg · [email protected]
Abstract
The present paper studies local distributed graph problems in highly dynamic networks. We define a
(in our view) natural generalization of static graph problems to the dynamic graph setting. For some parameter T > 0, the set of admissible outputs of nodes in a T -dynamic solution for a given graph problem
at some time t is defined by the dynamic graph topology in the time interval [t − T, t]. The guarantees
of a T -dynamic solution become stronger the more stable the graph remains during the interval [t − T, t]
and they coincide with the definition of the static graph problem if the graph is static throughout the interval. We further present an abstract framework that allows to develop distributed algorithms for a given
dynamic graph problem. For some T > 0, the algorithms always output a valid T -dynamic solution of
the given graph problem. Further, if a constant neighborhood around some part of the graph is stable
during an interval [t1 , t2 ], the algorithms compute a static solution for this part of the graph throughout
the interval [t1 + T ′ , t2 ] for some T ′ > 0. Ideally T and T ′ are of the same asymptotic order as the time
complexity for solving the given graph problem in static networks.
We apply our generic framework to two classic distributed symmetry breaking problems: the problem
of computing a (degree+1)-vertex coloring and the problem of computing a maximal independent set
(MIS) of the network graph. For both problems, we obtain distributed algorithms that always output a
valid O(log n)-dynamic solution. Further, if some part of the graph and its O(1)-neighborhood remain
stable for some interval [t1 , t2 ], for the given part of the graph, the algorithms compute a valid static
solution for the two problems that remains stable throughout an interval [t1 + O(log n), t2 ].
1
Supported by ERC Grant No. 336495 (ACDC).
1 Introduction & Related Work
Many modern computer systems are built on top of large-scale networks such as the Internet, the world
wide web, wireless ad hoc and sensor networks, or peer-to-peer networks. Often, the network topology of
such systems is inherently dynamic: nodes can join or leave at any time and (e.g., in the context of overlay
networks or mobile wireless networks) communication links might appear and disappear constantly. As a
consequence, we believe that it is important to develop distributed algorithms that can cope with a potentially
highly dynamic network topology and to understand what can and what cannot be computed in a dynamic
network. In the present paper, we develop techniques to develop distributed dynamic network solutions
for local distributed graph problems such as computing a graph coloring or a maximal independent set
(MIS) of the network graph (see, e.g., [ABI86, BEPS12, BE13, Gha16, Lub86]). Unlike previous solutions,
our algorithms always satisfy non-trivial guarantees, no matter how dynamic the network is. The guarantees
become stronger if the network is less dynamic and if the network becomes static in a constant neighborhood
around some part of the network, the solution of that part also coverges to a static solution after a short time.
By now, there is already a significant body of work that studies distributed computations in dynamic
network. However, to a large extent, the existing work deals with distributed solutions for mostly global
network problems such as broadcasting information to all nodes of a dynamic network [AGKM15,AAL+ 16,
BCF09, CFMS15, CMPS09, DPR+ 13, HK11, KLO10, OW05], computing a global function on inputs that
are distributed among the nodes of a dynamic network [JYZ17, KLO10, MCS13, MCS14, San15, YZJ16],
performing a random walk on the nodes of a dynamic network [AKL08, DMP15, DR14], solving agreement
problems in dynamic network [APRU15, KMO11, OSM04, RB04, ISWW09], or synchronizing clocks in
a dynamic network [FNC15, KLO11, KLLO10]. In contrast, in this paper, we focus on local distributed
algorithms [Pel00] that have a running time that is typically constant or polylogarithmic in the size of the
network. We believe that local distributed algorithms are particularly suited for dynamic networks. If a
distributed algorithm has time complexity T in a static network G, the output of each node v of G only
depends on the initial state of the T -neighborhood of v in G. Therefore if the topology of G only changes
locally, the algorithm can be used to repair an existing solution in time T by only changing the output
of nodes in a T -neighborhood around the local topological changes. In our opinion, this fact is one of
the key reasons why we should aim for distributed algorithms that are as local as possible. In [AS88,
APSPS92, LSW09], this connection between local algorithms and dynamic networks is made explicit. In
[AS88,APSPS92], it is shown that a synchronous T -round algorithm can be run in an asynchronous dynamic
network such that whenever the T -hop neighborhood of some part of the dynamic graph becomes stable, the
algorithm also eventually converges to a stable solution in this part of the graph. We note that if the graph
never becomes stable in some part, the results of [AS88, APSPS92] do not guarantee anything. In [LSW09],
it is shown that local distributed algorithms can be turned into fast converging self-stabilizing algorithms.2
The problem of locally repairing a single dynamic change in the network has been studied by CensorHillel, Haramaty and Karnin [CHHK16] for the problem of computing an MIS. They show that a simple
randomized distributed greedy algorithm guarantees that when a single topological change occurs (i.e., if a
single node or edge is inserted or deleted), on average, the MIS can be repaired in constant time and in fact
even such that only a constant number of nodes need to change their state.
While the above algorithms certainly encourage the use of local algorithms in dynamic networks, they
do not show that such algorithms can be used to always produce a meaningful output in a dynamic network
in which the topology constantly changes. To the best of our knowledge, none of the existing work on
distributed algorithms for solving graph problems in dynamic networks provides any non-trivial guarantees
if the network is arbitrarily dynamic. The objective of this work is to provide techniques that allow to
compute a meaningful output at all times, no matter how bad the dynamic network behaves. Clearly, it is
not possible to always output a valid solution for the current network topology for any non-trivial graph
problem. The requirement on the outputs produced by a distributed graph algorithm in a dynamic algorithm
2
A distributed algorithm is called self-stabilizing if it is guaranteed to converge to a stable and valid solution (in a static network)
even if the algorithm starts in an arbitrary initial state [Dij74, Dol00].
1
therefore have to depend on some (limited) history of the dynamic topology. Ideally, the guarantees depend
on the dynamics of the network topology: If the network is static or locally static, the guarantees should
be the same as for the static graph problem and the guarantees can become weaker the more dynamic the
network topology is.
1.1 Contribution & Techniques in a Nutshell
The contribution of this paper is threefold. We define a general method to turn a large class of static graph
problems into graph problems that are defined on arbitrarily dynamic graphs. The valid outputs at any point
in time are defined by the dynamic graph topology of the last T time units, where T is a parameter that ideally
is at most polylogarithmic in the number of nodes. We further provide a framework that allows to develop
a distributed algorithm for a given graph problem such that the output always satisfies the requirements of
the dynamic graph version of the problem and such that the output satisfies the guarantees of a (locally)
static solution if the graph is (locally) static for at least T time units. Finally, we provide instantiations of
our framework for two classic distributed symmetry breaking problems: computing a proper coloring such
that each node v has a color between 1 and deg(v) + 1 and computing an MIS of the network graph. In the
following, we provide an informal description of our model and framework, for formal definitions, we refer
to Sections 2 and 3.
We model a dynamic network as a synchronous system over a set V of n potential nodes. Time is
divided into rounds and in each round r = 0, 1, 2, . . . , there is a communication graph Gr = (Vr , Er ). We
will later assume that nodes can wake up gradually, however for the purpose of this summary, we assume
that all nodes wake up initially and we thus have Vr = V for all r ≥ 1. We consider graph problems that
can be decomposed into two parts that are given by a packing and a covering graph property. Essentially,
a packing property is a graph property that remains true when removing edges and a covering property is a
graph property that remains true when adding edges. In addition, we assume that the validity of a solution
can be checked locally, i.e., by evaluating it in the constant neighborhood of every node [FKP11, NS93].
For the formal details, we refer to Section 2. For example, the problem of finding an MIS on a graph G
can be decomposed into the problem of finding a subset S of the nodes such that no two neighbors are
in S (packing property) and S is a dominating set of G (covering property). For the (degree+1)-coloring
problem, the requirement that the vertex coloring is proper is a packing property and the requirement that
the color of a node v is from {1, . . . , deg(v) + 1} is a covering property. For a given graph problem and an
integer parameter T ≥ 1, we say that a given solution is a T -dynamic solution at time r if a) the solution
satisfies the packing property for the intersection graph GTr ∩ = Gr−T +1 ∩Gr−T +1 ∩. . .∩Gr (i.e., the graph
that contains all edges that have been present throughout the last T rounds), and b) the solution satisfies the
covering property for the union graph GTr ∪ = Gr−T +1 ∪ Gr−T +1 ∪ . . . ∪ Gr (i.e., the graph that contains
all edges that have been present at least once in the last T rounds). We believe that this provides a natural
generalization of a static graph problem to the dynamic context. Note that the dynamic guarantees are
stronger the less dynamic the graph is and if the graph has been static during rounds r − T + 1, . . . , r, a
T -dynamic solution at time r is that same as a static solution for the given graph problem for the graph Gr
in round r.
When designing a distributed algorithm for a given dynamic graph problem, we require that for some
T ≥ 1, the algorithm outputs a valid T -dynamic solution after each round r. Assume that we can construct
an algorithm A such that if all nodes start A in round 1, after round T , A outputs a valid T -dynamic solution
w.r.t. to the first T graphs (i.e., a solution that satisfies the packing property for GTT ∩ and the covering
property for GTT ∪ ). Given such an algorithm A, we can in principle design an algorithm that always outputs
a valid T -dynamic solution by just starting a new instance of A in every round and outputting the solution
of an instance started in round r + 1 after round r + T . However, clearly such a solution would not be
satisfactory because especially if A is randomized, the output might change completely from round to round
even if the graph is only mildly dynamic or even static. We therefore refine the above approach and define
two abstract types of algorithms to deal with dynamic graph problems.
For two positive integers T and α, we say that an algorithm SA LG is a (T, α)-network-static algorithm
2
for a given dynamic graph problem if it satisfies the following properties. At the end of each round r ≥ 1,
the algorithm outputs a valid partial solution for the graph Gr .3 In addition, if the α-neighborhood of some
node v remains static in some interval [r, r2 ], v must output a fixed value 6= ⊥ throughout the interval
[r + T, r2 ]. Further, for a positive integer T , we say that an algorithm DA LG is a T -dynamic algorithm for
a given dynamic graph problem if it satisfies the following property. Let r ≥ 1 be some round and assume
that we are given a valid partial solution for Gr . If DA LG is started in round r + 1, at the end of round
r + T − 1, it outputs a valid T -dynamic solution that extends the given partial solution for Gr . The following
theorem shows that a T1 -dynamic algorithm and a (T2 , α)-network-static algorithm can be combined to
obtain a distributed algorithm that always outputs a valid T1 -dynamic solution while (essentially) inheriting
the properties of SA LG if the graph is locally static for sufficiently long. Our framework thus allows to
separate the two tasks of (1) always outputting a T -dynamic solution and (2) provide a locally stable output
if the network is locally static.
Theorem 1.1. Let T1 and T2 be positive integers, P a packing, and C a covering problem. Let DA LG be
a T1 -dynamic algorithm and SA LG a (T2 , α)-network-static algorithm for (P, C) . Then one can combine
both algorithms to an algorithm such that:
1. (dynamic solution) Its output in round r is a T1 -dynamic solution for (P, C) .
2. (locally static) If the graph is static in the α-neighborhood of a node v ∈ Vr in all rounds in an
interval [r, r2 ] then the output of v does not change for all rounds l ∈ [r + T1 + T2 , r2 ].
We show how to apply the above framework to two of the classic local symmetry breaking problems:
computing a vertex coloring and computing an MIS of the network graph. In both cases, we can adapt
existing algorithms to obtain a (O(log n), O(1))-network-static algorithm SA LG and a O(log n)-dynamic
algorithm DA LG. For vertex coloring, we use a variant of the most basic randomized coloring algorithm. In
each round, each uncolored node v selects a uniformly random color from {1, . . . , deg(v) + 1} \S, where S
is the set of colors that are already taken by the colored neighbors of v. Node v keeps a color if no neighbor
chooses the color in the same round.4 5
Theorem 1.2. There is a T = O(log n) and an algorithm that, w.h.p., outputs a T -dynamic solution for
(degree+1)-coloring in every round and the output of any node v is static in all rounds l ∈ [r + 2T, r2 ] if
the 2-neighborhood of v is static in all rounds in the interval [r, r2 ].
For the MIS problem we adapt the algorithm by Ghaffari [Gha16] to obtain a (O(log n), O(1))-networkstatic algorithm SA LG and we adapt Luby’s well-known algorithm [ABI86, Lub86] to obtain a O(log n)dynamic algorithm DA LG.
Theorem 1.3. There is a T = O(log n) and an algorithm that, w.h.p., outputs a T -dynamic solution for
MIS in every round and the output of any node v is static in all rounds l ∈ [r + 2T, r2 ] if the 2-neighborhood
of v is static in all rounds in the interval [r, r2 ].
Outline
In Section 2 we introduce our dynamic graph model and provide further notation. In Section 3 we formally
introduce packing and covering problems as well as T -dynamic and (T, α)-network-static algorithms and
3
In a partial solution, nodes are allowed to output ⊥. For each node v that ouputs a value 6= ⊥, it must hold that there exists an
extension of the partial solution such that the packing property for v is satisfied and the covering property for v is satisfied for all
extensions of the partial solution. For a formal definition, we again refer to Sections 2 and 3.
4
It is commonly known that this simple randomized algorithm terminates in O(log n) rounds in static graphs. The algorithm is
for example used and analyzed in [BEPS12, Joh99].
5
We say that a statement holds with high probability (w.h.p.) if it holds with probability 1 − 1/nc for a constant c > 1 that can
be chosen arbitrarily. We assume that all executions are of length at most polynomial in n. All our probabilistic results could be
extended to arbitrarily long executions if we allow the output to be invalid in a polynomially small fraction of the rounds.
3
prove Theorem 1.1. In Section 4 we apply the framework from Section 3 to the (degree+1)-coloring problem
to prove Theorem 1.2 and in Section 5 we apply the framework to the MIS problem to prove Theorem 1.3.
Finally, in Section 6, we introduce a pipelined version of the basic randomized coloring algorithm to which
we refer in Section 4.
2 Dynamic Graph Model
A dynamic graph is a sequence of graphs G0 = (V0 , E0 ), G1 = (V1 , E1 ), G2 = (V2 , E2 ), . . . that is
provided by an adaptive worst case adversary in a synchronous round-based model. We require that the
sequence of nodes ∅ = V0 ⊆ V1 ⊆ . . . is increasing. This allows the addition of nodes to the network and a
node v leaving the network can be modeled by removing all edges adjacent to v but keeping the node in the
network as an inactive isolated node. Throughout this work n is an upper bound on the number of nodes in
Vi for each i and n is known by all nodes of the network. Round r consists of the following steps:
1. The adversary changes the graph, i.e., it provides graph Gr = (Vr , Er ),
2. Nodes send/receive messages through the edges Er and perform local computations,
3. Each node returns its output.
The algorithm can use fresh randomness in every round. The communication is by local broadcast and a
node does not have to know its neighbors at the beginning of a round; in particular a node does not know its
degree in Gr at the beginning of round r. We do not limit the message size but all presented algorithms can
be adapted to work with poly log n bits per message. Whenever we say that a property holds in round r we
mean that the property holds at the end of round r, that is, before the adversary has changed the input graph
to graph Gr+1 and after the nodes have performed the computations of round r.
Definition 2.1. For any integer T ≥ 0 and round r, define r0 = max{0, r − T + 1} and
VrT ∩ :=
r
\
r ′ =r
Vr′
0
and
ErT ∩ :=
r
\
r ′ =r
Er′
0
and
ErT ∪ :=
r
[
r ′ =r
We call GTr ∩ := VrT ∩ , ErT ∩ the (T -)intersecting graph (in round r) and GTr ∪ :=
(T -)union graph (in round r).
Er′ .
0
VrT ∩ , ErT ∪ the
Asynchronous wake up can be modeled via Vr being the nodes that have woken up until round r. Then,
in round r, VrT ∩ contains the nodes that have been awake for at least T rounds and V0 = ∅ means that all
nodes are asleep at the beginning. When a node wakes up it does not know the current round number; round
numbers are only for the sake of analysis. Note that GTr ∩ ⊆ Gr , so any edge in the intersecting graph can
be used for communication purposes in round r. However, there is no guarantee that edges in GTr ∪ can be
used for communication in round r.
Definition 2.2 (Distributed Graph Problem). A distributed graph problem T is given by a set of tuples of the
form (G, ~y ), where G = (V, E) is a simple, undirected graph and ~y is a |V |-dimensional vector with entries
yv for each node v ∈ V . The output vector ~y is called a solution for T if (G, ~y ) ∈ T. Furthermore, yv is the
output of v; if a node has not produced any output yet we set yv = ⊥. A vector ~z is called an extension of ~y
if zv = yv whenever yv 6= ⊥. In a solution we require that all nodes produce some output. A vector φ with
an entry for each node of G is also called an input.
In this paper we consider distributed graph problems for which the feasibility of a solution can be
verified by checking the solution for each O(1)-radius neighborhood (cf. the problem class LD(O(1))
in [FKP11]); maximal independent set and coloring can be checked with radius one. In the style of locally
4
checkable labeling problems (LCL problems) [NS93] we say that the LCL condition satisfied for a node if
the feasibility check of its O(1)-neighborhood is positive. We model the maximal independent set (MIS) as
all the pairs (G, ~y ) such that M = {v ∈ V | yv = 1} is an MIS of G and yv = 0 for all v ∈
/ M . The problem
of properly c-coloring consists of all the valid pairs (G, ~y ) with yv ∈ [c] for all v ∈ V (G) and yv 6= yu for
all {u, v} ∈ E(G).
A ρ-oblivious adversary does not know the random bits of the last ρ rounds, e.g., a 2-oblivious adversary
does not know the random bits of round r and r − 1 when determining graph Gr . An adaptive offline
adversary knows all random bits of the algorithm in advance. Our algorithms rely on different types of
adversaries and we mention the respective type with the respective algorithm.
Notation
′
For an algorithm A let Arr (φ) denote the output of the algorithm if it starts its computation in round r with
input φ and runs until round r ′ (inclusively), that is, it executes the rounds r, r + 1, r + 2, . . . r ′ . For a node
v ∈ V (G), NG (v) denotes the set of its neighbors in the graph G. For positive integers α, k and a node v,
let Nα (v) denote the α-neighborhood of v and [k] := 1, . . . , k. For a round r, and a positive integer T , we
∪T
∩T
∪T
denote by dr (v) (d∩T
r (v), dr (v) resp.) the degree of v in Gr (Gr , Gr resp.).
We repeatedly use the inequalities (1 − x) ≤ e−x for all x and
1 − x ≥ 4−x for x ≤
1
.
2
(1)
3 A Framework for Highly Dynamic Network Algorithms
The main objective of this section is to prove Theorem 1.1. In this section we also formally introduce
packing and covering problems as well as T -dynamic and (T, α)-network-static algorithms. We begin with
the definition of packing and covering problems.
Definition 3.1 (Packing, Covering Problem). We call a distributed graph problem T
• packing if any solution for a graph G is a solution for any graph G1 = (V, E ′ ⊆ E(G)),
• covering if any solution for a graph G is a solution for any graph G1 = (V, E ′ ⊇ E(G)).
The independent set problem is a packing problem. The dominating set problem is a covering problem.
Properly coloring without any restriction on the number of colors is a packing problem. (Improperly) coloring a given graph where adjacent nodes are allowed to have the same colors and where v’s color is in the
range {1, . . . , deg(v) + 1} is a covering problem.
Very often packing and covering problems have trivial solutions, e.g., the emptyset is an independent
set or all nodes form a dominating set. In the setting of LCL problems usually only their intersection is
an object of interest, e.g., the intersection of the independent set problem and the dominating set problem
is an MIS. The intersection of the introduced packing and covering coloring variants leads to the standard
(degree+1) coloring problem. Our goal is to devise algorithms for highly dynamic networks that, in every
round, guarantee properties which are closely related to the original problem and behave well in static
graphs. In particular we desire the following guarantees:
(1) For a suitably chosen T and any round r it should be a solution for the packing problem in G∩T
r and
∪T
for the covering problem in Gr .
(2) The output should locally not change if the dynamic graph is locally static.
We present a general framework to combine algorithms that separately take care of the requirements (1)
and (2). The following natural properties describe the algorithms satisfying (1) and (2).
Definition 3.2. Let T be a distributed graph problem. We call a vector φ
5
• partial packing for T if there is an extension φ̄ of φ with φ̄u 6= ⊥, for all u ∈ V such that for all nodes
v with φv 6= ⊥ the LCL condition of T is satisfied in φ̄.
• partial covering for T if for all extensions φ̄ of φ with φ̄u 6= ⊥, for all u ∈ V and for all nodes with
φv 6= ⊥ the LCL condition of T is satisfied in φ̄.
Let P be a packing problem and C a covering problem. We call an output vector φ a partial solution for
(P, C) if φ is partial packing for P and partial covering for C.
Definition 3.3 (dynamic, network-static). Let P be a packing problem, C a covering problem, T and α
positive integers and G0 , G1 , . . . a dynamic graph.
• An algorithm A is called T -dynamic for (P, C) if it satisfies the following:
′
A.1 (input-extending) For any j ′ ≥ j and any vector φ, Ajj (φ) is an extension of φ.
A.2 (finalizing) For j ≥ T −1 and any partial solution φ for (P,C) in Gj−T +1 , the output Ajj−T +2 (φ)
∪T
is a solution for P in G∩T
j and a solution for C in Gj .
• An algorithm A is called (T, α)-network-static for (P, C) if it satisfies for any input φ:
B.1 (partial solution) Its output in round j is a partial solution for (P, C) in Gj .
B.2 (locally static) For each v ∈ Vr and each interval [r, r2 ] with Gl Nα (v) = Gl′ Nα (v) for all
l, l′ ∈ [r, r2 ], the output of v is 6= ⊥ and does not change for all l, l′ ∈ [r + T, r2 ].
A.1 requires that a dynamic algorithm never deletes anything from a partial solution of a problem. A.2
says that any solution which is a partial solution of both problems is completed within T rounds. B.1 ensures
that the algorithm always computes partial solutions for the current graph and B.2 ensures that the algorithm
behaves well if it is locally static.
Now, we combine a T -network-static algorithm SA LG with a T -dynamic algorithm DA LG. SA LG is
started in round zero and serves as a base algorithm that first computes a partial solution and forwards it
to DA LG. Then DA LG extends it to a full solution. If the graph is locally static SA LG provides a locally
unchanged output that is not changed by DA LG.
Algorithm 1 Round r of C ONCAT
Input:
Output:
Vars.:
⊥
φr
φj
J
(no node has an output)
Output of SA LG in round j, partial solution for (P, C) on Gj
One of the DA LG-instances
Start: Initiate an SA LG-instance SA LG(⊥); φ−1 = ⊥
// No communication round needed
Round r of C ONCAT
1: Start a new DA LG-instance DA LG(φr−1 )
2: if there are T1 − 1 DA LG instances then discard the oldest DA LG-instance
3: for all DA LG-instances J do in parallel
4:
Execute one round of J
5: In parallel to the above, execute one further round of SA LG; denote the output with φr .
6: Output the output of the oldest DA LG-instance
This algorithm leads to our following main theorem.
Theorem 1.1. Let T1 and T2 be positive integers, P a packing, and C a covering problem. Let DA LG be
a T1 -dynamic algorithm and SA LG a (T2 , α)-network-static algorithm for (P, C) . Then one can combine
both algorithms to an algorithm such that:
6
1. (dynamic solution) Its output in round r is a T1 -dynamic solution for (P, C) .
2. (locally static) If the graph is static in the α-neighborhood of a node v ∈ Vr in all rounds in an
interval [r, r2 ] then the output of v does not change for all rounds l ∈ [r + T1 + T2 , r2 ].
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
1. If r < T1 − 1, the graphs Gr∩T1 and Gr∪T1 are both empty as no node has been awake for T1 rounds.
For r ≥ T1 − 1 let ψ := SA LG 0r−T1 +1 . At the beginning of round r − T1 + 2, C ONCAT starts a new
instance of DA LG on ψ. This instance becomes the output of C ONCAT exactly after the run of T1 − 1
rounds, i.e., C ONCAT outputs DA LG rr−T1 +2 (ψ) after round r. By property B.1 we know that ψ is a
partial solution for (P, C) in Gr−T1 +1 and thus by A.2 C ONCATr0 is a solution for P in Gr∩T1 and a
solution for C in Gr∪T1 .
2
2. Due to B.2, we have (ψ)v := (SA LG r+T
)v = (SA LG l0 )v 6= ⊥ for all l ∈ [r + T2 , r2 ]. This is the
0
input of all DA LG instances starting between r + T2 + 1 and r2 + 1. As DA LG is input-extending
(A.1) (ψ)v is also the output of C ONCAT for v in any round l ∈ [r + T1 + T2 , r2 ].
The following remark holds along similar lines as the proof of Theorem 1.1, 1.
Remark. Theorem 1.1 also holds if V0 6= ∅ and the algorithm is started with a solution in G0 for P and C as
input.
Remark. In principle, using the same technique, one could also combine more than two algorithms. One
could for example imagine to also have a dynamic network algorithm that has stronger guarantees, but only
works in dynamic networks with much more limited dynamic changes. In combination with the static and
the dynamic algorithms considered in the paper, this can lead to an algorithm that a) converges to a locally
stable solution if the graph is locally static, b) satisfies the stronger dynamic guarantees if the topological
changes are only of the required limited form, and c) satisfies the dynamic guarantees of the present paper
for arbitrary dynamic topologies.
4 Coloring in Highly Dynamic Networks
In this chapter we consider the coloring problem. Let CP be the problem of properly coloring the nodes
of a graph without an upper bound on the number of colors. CC is the (potentially non proper) degree + 1
coloring problem, i.e., the color c(u) of node u has to be in the range {1, . . . , deg(v) + 1}. Both problems
are LCL problems as the feasibility of a solution can be checked by investigating the 1-neighborhood. This
section is devoted to proving Theorem 1.2.
Theorem 1.2. There is a T = O(log n) and an algorithm that, w.h.p., outputs a T -dynamic solution for
(degree+1)-coloring in every round and the output of any node v is static in all rounds l ∈ [r + 2T, r2 ] if
the 2-neighborhood of v is static in all rounds in the interval [r, r2 ].
For this purpose we will present two randomized algorithms, one being T -dynamic (cf. Section 4.1) and
the other (T, α)-network-static for (CP , CC ), w.h.p., for a T ∈ O(log n) and α = 2 (cf. Section 4.2). Both
algorithms are variants of the following basic randomized coloring algorithm [BEPS12,Joh99] that operates
in phases of two rounds: In the first round each uncolored node v chooses a tentative uniformly at random
color from the range {1, . . . , deg(v) + 1} \ S (where S is the set of forbidden colors that colored neighbors
have chosen previously). In the second round v keeps the color if no neighboring node picked the same
color and otherwise it discards the color. This two rounds in one phase implementation is not desirable in
an asynchronous wake-up model without a global clock. In Section 6 we thus provide a pipelined version
for the basic randomized coloring algorithm (for static graphs) that works without a global clock. The
algorithms we present in this chapter are based on this pipelined version.
7
4.1 The O(log n)-Dynamic Coloring Algorithm DC OLOR
DC OLOR is a variant of the basic randomized coloring algorithm, with the difference that the communication network is always restricted to the current intersection graph. At all times each uncolored node has a
palette Pv of potential colors. When DC OLOR is started in round j, the palette Pv is initialized with the set
[dj (v) + 1] without the colors of v’s neighbors in Gj . As long as v is uncolored, in each round r ≥ j it
chooses a tentative uniformly at random color from its current palette, sends it to its neighbors and receives
the tentative colors and permanently chosen colors from its neighbors in the intersection graph Gr∩
j+r . If its
tentative color c is not among the received colors, v permanently keeps color c and informs its neighbors
about its choice in the next round. Otherwise, v stays uncolored, deletes the received permanent colors from
its palette and repeats the procedure.
Algorithm 2 DC OLOR
Input:
Output:
Vars.:
n-vector φ
φ
φ, Pv
R
Color palette.
Communication is always restricted to GR∩
r .
Denote by j the round in which the algorithm starts. v does not have to know this value.
Start: R = 0.
// The start needs one communication round
Send φv to all neighbors in Gj . Receive values from neighbors.
// Initialize color palette
If φv = ⊥, set Pv = [dj (v) + 1] \ {φw | w ∈ NGj (v)}
Round r of DC OLOR
1: switch φv = ? do
2:
case φv = ⊥: Pick tentative color cv ∈ Pv u.a.r. and send it to neighbors in GR∩
r .
R∩
3:
case φv 6= ⊥: Send φv to neighbors in Gr .
4: Receive fixed colors Fv = {φw | w ∈ NGR∩
(v)} and tentative colors Sv = {cw | w ∈ NGR∩
(v)}.
r
r
5: Pv = Pv \ Fv
// Update color palette
6: switch φv = ? do
7:
case φv = ⊥:
8:
if cv ∈ Pv and cv ∈
/ Sv then φv = cv else keep φv = ⊥.
9:
case φv 6= ⊥: Do nothing.
10: R + +
// Intersect one more graph in the next round
11: Output φ
We show that DC OLOR is O(log n)-dynamic, w.h.p.
Lemma 4.1. DC OLOR is T -dynamic for (CP , CC ) w.h.p. for a T ∈ O(log n).
To prove the result we first have to show that each node is decided after O(log n) rounds (Lemma 4.4).
For this purpose we prove that – regardless of the dynamicity – the palette of v is always larger than the
number of uncolored neighbors in the intersection graph (Lemma 4.2). With this property we show in
Lemma 4.3 that if less than a fourth of the colors are deleted from v’s palette in the current round, then with
constant probability v chooses a so called good color that it can keep with constant probability. Lemma 4.4
then follows together with the property that colors are never added to v’s palette in DC OLOR and a node is
colored once its palette size equals one.
If DC OLOR is started in round j, then for a node v and an R ≥ 0, let
U (v) := {u ∈ NGR∩ (v) | φu = ⊥}
j+R
be the set of uncolored neighbors of node v in the intersection graph in round j + R. We omit the round
number in the notation as it will be always clear from the context.
8
Lemma 4.2. For all v ∈ V , in every round of DC OLOR one has |Pv | ≥ |U (v)| + 1.
Proof. Assume DC OLOR is started in round j. The inequality is true in round j as Pv is initially set to
[dj (v) + 1]. In the following rounds, whenever a color is removed from Pv , at least one neighbor of v chose
this color, i.e., |U (v)| decreases by at least one. Apart from that, changes in the graph topology can only
decrease the number of uncolored neighbors of v in the intersection graph and do not affect the palette.
Lemma 4.3. In one round of DC OLOR, each uncolored node is colored with probability at least 1/64 or
its color palette shrinks by a factor of at least 1/4.
Proof. Assume DC OLOR is started in round j. Let R ≥ 0 and v be uncolored at the beginning of round
j + R. We assume |U (v)| ≥ 1 (otherwise, v will be colored in the current round as there will be no conflicts
for v’s color choice). As v ∈ U (u) for all u ∈ U (v) one deduces that U (u) ≥ 1 holds for these nodes.
By Lemma 4.2, v and its uncolored neighbors have palettes of size at least 2. We emphasize that all of the
following definitions and arguments are only for the sake of the analysis and nodes executing the algorithm
do not need to know these parameters. For a color c ∈ Pv , define the weight of c as
wc :=
X
{u∈U (v)|c∈Pu }
1
.
|Pu |
Let Zv be the set of those colors in Pv which have been permanently chosen by some u ∈ NGR∩ (v) in the
j+R
last round (these are the colors which will be deleted from Pv in the current round after (!) node v chose its
tentative color). Call a color c ∈ Pv good if c ∈
/ Zv and wc ≤ 2. For a good color c we have
Y
Pr (v keeps c | v chose c as tentative color) =
{u∈U (v)|c∈Pu }
1
1−
|Pu |
(1)
1
.
≥ 4−wc ≥ 4−2 =
16
At most |U (v)|/2 colors from Pv can have a weight larger than 2 because
!
X
X
X
X |Pu ∩ Pv |
1
wc =
=
≤ |U (v)| .
|Pu |
|Pu |
c∈Pv
u∈U (v)
c∈Pu ∩Pv
u∈N (v)
colors in Pv are not good. With |U (v)|
≤ |P2v | it follows
So in addition to the colors in Zv , at most |U (v)|
2
2
that in Pv , at least |Pv | − |Zv | − |P2v | colors are good. When we assume that |Zv | ≤ |P4v | (i.e., the color
palette of v shrinks by a factor of at most 1/4 in this round), then at least one fourth of the colors, i.e.,
|Pv | − |Zv | − |P2v | ≥ |P4v | , are good. So in this case, the probability for choosing a good color is at least 1/4,
which means that the overall probability for v being colored is at least 1/64. Therefore, if the color palette
of v does not shrink by a factor of at least 1/4, v is colored with probability at least 1/64.
Lemma 4.4. There is a T ∈ O(log n) such that for any dynamic graph and any input, after T − 1 rounds
of DC OLOR , w.h.p. all nodes are colored.
Proof. Assume DC OLOR is started
in round j on some dynamic graph and some input φ. Fix a constant
b ≥ 1 and set T1 := log 3 n4 , T2 := 64(b + 1) ln(n) and T ′ := T1 + T2 = O(log n). For each initially
4
uncolored node v (i.e., φv = ⊥), denote by Av the event that v is not colored after round j + T ′ , i.e., after the
execution of the start round j and the T ′ following rounds. For Av to come true, there can have been at most
T1 rounds in which v’s color palette shrinks by a factor of at least 1/4, because after T1 such rounds, one has
T
|Pv | ≤ n 43 1 = 1 (initially it is |Pv | ≤ n), which means that v’s color palette can not shrink another time
without v getting colored (a node will get colored before its palette gets empty). By Lemma 4.3 it follows
that there must have been at least T2 rounds in which v got colored with probability at least 1/64, so we
9
T2
1 T2
1
obtain Pr(Av ) ≤ (1 − 64
) ≤ e− 64 = nb+1
. With a union bound over all nodes, we can upper bound the
probability that there is an uncolored node left after round j + T ′ :
!
[
1
n
Au ≤ b+1 = b .
Pr
n
n
u∈V
It follows that with probability at least 1 −
we get the desired result.
1
,
nb
all nodes are colored after round j + T ′ . With T := T ′ + 2,
Once all nodes are colored the output of DC OLOR will be the same in all following rounds as DC OLOR
never uncolors a node.
Before we prove Lemma 4.1, we shortly characterize a vector φ that is partial packing and partial covering in this context: A vector φ is partial packing if there is an extension of φ in which the LCL condition of
CP is satisfied for all nodes with φv 6= ⊥ (cf. Definition 3.2). If the graph induced by all colored nodes of φ
forms a proper coloring it is straightforward to build such an extension by greedily coloring the remaining
nodes. Thus φ is partial packing if and only if the graph induced by all colored nodes of φ forms a proper
coloring. A vector φ is partial covering if the LCL condition of CC is satisfied for all nodes with φv 6= ⊥ and
for all extensions of φ. The feasibility of the LCL condition of CC for a node v only depends on the color of
v and its degree – it is independent from the colors of its neighbors. Both parameters do not depend on the
choice of the extension and it is sufficient that v’s color is in [d(v) + 1] for all v with φv 6= ⊥ to prove that
φ is partial covering.
Proof of Lemma 4.1. Let T = O(log n) be as in Lemma 4.4.
Property A.1: Getting φ as input, DC OLOR will only change the values of nodes v with φv = ⊥. Hence
DC OLOR is input-extending.
Property A.2: Let j ≥ T −1 and φ a partial solution for (CP , CC ) in Gj−T +1 . Let φ′ := DC OLOR jj−T +2 (φ).
By Lemma 4.4, all nodes have chosen a color, w.h.p. We show: (1) φ′v 6= φ′w for all nodes v and w adjacent
∪T
′
in G∩T
j ; (2) φv ∈ [dj (v) + 1] for all nodes v.
(1): Consider two nodes v and w adjacent in every graph Gj−T +1 , . . . , Gj , i.e., adjacent in G∩T
j . If
φv , φw 6= ⊥, we also have φ′v 6= φ′w as φ is partial packing for CP in Gj−T +1 and both nodes keep their
color. Now, assume that v or w is uncolored in round j − T + 1. It is not possible for them to take the
same color in the same round (if they choose the same tentative color, they discard it again). If node v (node
w) is colored with color c before w (before v) or was already colored with color c in the input φ , then c
is removed from w’s palette (v ′ s palette), i.e., node w (node v) is not able to take color c in the following
rounds.
(2): Fix a node v. If φv 6= ⊥, then φ′v = φv (A.1) and φv ∈ [dj−T +1 (v) + 1] ⊆ [d∪T
j (v) + 1] as φ is
partial covering for CC in Gj−T +1 . If v gets colored in some round i ∈ {j − T + 2, . . . , j}, it takes a color
among [di (v) + 1] ⊆ [d∪T
j (v) + 1].
4.2 The O(log n)-Network-Static Coloring Algorithm SC OLOR
SC OLOR is similar to DC OLOR and we describe a single round of the algorithm: Colored nodes send their
color to their neighbors (call these colors fixed to distinguish them from tentative colors), uncolored nodes
choose a tentative color from their palette and send them to their neighbors. But here, unlike in DC OLOR,
the graph used for communication in round r is the current graph Gr and not the intersection graph. Then the
color palettes are updated: Node v’s new palette is the set [dr (v)+1] without the fixed colors of its neighbors.
So in contrast to DC OLOR, colors can also be added to the palette. Then two cases are considered: (1) If v
is uncolored, it checks if its tentative color is part of its new palette and not among its neighbors’ tentative
colors. If yes, v colors itself with this color, if not, v stays uncolored. (2) If v is colored, it checks if its color
is part of its palette. If yes, it keeps its color, if not, it uncolors itself.
10
Algorithm 3 SC OLOR
Input:
Output:
Vars.:
φ
φ
φ, Pv
Start: Pv = {1}
Color palette.
// Initialize color palette (no communication round needed)
Round r of SC OLOR
1: switch φv = ? do
2:
case φv = ⊥: Pick tentative color cv ∈ Pv u.a.r. and send it to neighbors in Gr .
3:
case φv 6= ⊥: Send φv to neighbors in Gr .
4: Receive fixed colors Fv = {φw | w ∈ NGr (v)} and tentative colors Sv = {cw | w ∈ NGr (v)}.
5: Pv = [dr (v) + 1] \ Fv
// Update color palette
6: switch φv = ? do
7:
case φv = ⊥:
8:
if cv ∈ Pv and cv ∈
/ Sv then φv = cv else keep φv = ⊥.
9:
case φv 6= ⊥:
// Potential Uncoloring
10:
if φv ∈
/ Pv then Set φv = ⊥.
11: Output φ
We show that SC OLOR is (T, α = 2)-network-static, w.h.p. The result is based on the local nature of the
basic coloring algorithm and the fact that a node and its neighbors do not uncolor themselves in SC OLOR if
the 2-neighborhood of the node is static.
Lemma 4.5. SC OLOR is (T, α = 2)-network-static for (CP , CC ) w.h.p. for a T ∈ O(log n).
Proof. For proving B.1 we have to show that at the end of each round r, no colored node has a neighbor
in Gr with the same color and the color of node v is in the range [dr (v) + 1]. Both properties are fulfilled
as any node which does not satisfy them is uncolored (cf. line 10 in Algorithm 3). Property B.1 is satisfied
independently of the choice of T .
For proving B.2, let T ′ = O(log n) be the runtime of the basic coloring algorithm for static graphs
(Lemma 6.1) and set T := T ′ + 2. Let v ∈ Vr and r2 ≥ r + T such that Gl [N2 (v)] = Gl′ [N2 (v)] for all
l, l′ ∈ [r, r2 ] (for r2 < r + T , B.2 holds trivially). A node may uncolor itself only if it becomes adjacent to
a node which has the same color or if the value of its current degree plus one falls below its chosen color.
Both things do not happen if v’s 1-neighborhood is static. So if v is colored after round r + T , it will keep
its color at lest until round r2 .
We show why v is colored in O(log n) rounds, w.h.p., if its 2-neighborhood is static from round r on:
In that case v executes the same steps in SC OLOR as it does in the basic algorithm for static graphs (cf.
Section 6). This does not hold for all nodes in the dynamic network. However, the knowledge about the
behavior of all nodes that we need to mimic the proof of Lemma 6.1 can be reduced to three properties that
have to hold as long as v is uncolored. Thus we only have to prove the following three properties:
(1) In all rounds in the interval [r + 2, r2 ], the color palettes of v’s uncolored neighbors have size ≥ 2.
(2) From round r + 1 to r2 , the size of v’s color palette is at least the number of v’s uncolored neighbors.
(3) From round r + 1 to r2 , colors may only be deleted from but never join Pv .
With (1) and (2), we show that if less than |Pv |/4 colors are deleted from Pv in the current round, then with
probability 1/16 v chooses a so called good color and keeps it with probability at least 1/4. Thus the palette
of v shrinks by a constant factor or v is colored with constant probability. With (3) it follows that v has
chosen a color after O(log n) rounds, w.h.p.
Even though the three statements seem to be trivially satisfied this needs careful arguments, e.g., (1)
might not be satisfied in rounds r and r + 1.
(1) Let w ∈ N (v) and v, w be uncolored in some round in [r+2, r2 ]. As the nodes do not uncolor themselves
in all rounds in [r + 1, r2 ], both nodes are already uncolored at the end of round r (one cannot deduce that
11
they are uncolored in the first competition for colors at the beginning of round r as they could be colored
in round r − 1, at the beginning of r and only become uncolored at the end of round r due to a new edge
in round r). Then in round r + 1, Pw is updated to [dr (w) + 1] \ Fw (the degree of w does not change),
where Fw contains the colors of w’s colored neighbors. As v is an uncolored neighbor of w, it follows that
|Fw | ≤ dr (w) − 1 and therefore |Pw | ≥ dr (w) + 1 − |Fw | ≥ 2. In the following rounds, a color can only
be deleted from Pw if one of w’s (already existing) neighbors takes this color. But as long as w has v as
uncolored neighbor, the value of dr (w) + 1 is always at least larger by two than the number of its colored
neighbors.
(2) In round r, Pv is set to [dr (v) + 1] \ Fv . The size of Fv is at most the number of v’s colored neighbors,
so the size of Pv is at least the number of v’s uncolored neighbors. In the following rounds, as v’s degree is
static, a color may only be deleted from Pv if at least one of its neighbors chooses this color, i.e., if v looses
at least one uncolored neighbor. On the other hand, the number of v’s uncolored neighbors can not increase
as none of v’s neighbors uncolors itself as long as v’s 2-neighborhood is static.
(3) As v’s degree remains static, a color may only join Pv if a neighbor of v uncolors itself and its color
thus becomes available for v again. But as pointed out above no neighbor of v uncolors itself if v’s 2neighborhood is static.
4.3 Proof of Theorem 1.2
Theorem 1.1 with the O(log n)-network-static SC OLOR for (CP , CC ) (cf. Lemma 4.5) and the O(log n)dynamic algorithm DC OLOR (cf. Lemma 4.1) for (CP , CC ) implies the result.
Remark. The analysis of DC OLOR and SC OLOR does not require the adversary to have any obliviousness.
Thus, all results in this section are valid even for an adaptive offline adversary, which knows the choice of
random bits in any round in advance.
5 MIS in Highly Dynamic Networks
Let MP be the independent set problem (packing) and MC be the dominating set problem (covering).
Both problems are LCL problems as the feasibility of a solution can be checked by investigating the 1neighborhood. The main objective of this section is to prove the following theorem.
Theorem 1.3. There is a T = O(log n) and an algorithm that, w.h.p., outputs a T -dynamic solution for
MIS in every round and the output of any node v is static in all rounds l ∈ [r + 2T, r2 ] if the 2-neighborhood
of v is static in all rounds in the interval [r, r2 ].
Instead of the vector-notation from Section 2, we use the more intuitive notion with dynamic set variables: Algorithms produce a tuple of sets (M, D) with M denoting the MIS-nodes and D the dominated
nodes. This notation can be easily translated into the vector-notation from Section 2 by setting the value of
a node to 1 if it is in M , to 0 if it is in D and to ⊥ if it is in V \ (M ∪ D).
The T -dynamic algorithm in section Section 5.1 is a modification of Luby’s algorithm [ABI86, Lub86].
Luby’s algorithm proceeds in phases of two rounds: First each undecided node draws a random number and
sends it to its neighbors. In the second round, nodes with the smallest number in their neighborhood join M
and inform their neighbors which then join D. We present a pipelined version of Luby’s algorithm in which
each round is identical such that it works in the asynchronous wake up model.
The network static algorithm in Section 5.2 is based on a modified and pipelined version of the MIS
algorithm in [Gha16].
5.1 The O(log n)-Dynamic MIS Algorithm DM IS
DM IS (dynamic MIS) is an implementation of Luby’s algorithm, where any form of communication in
round r ≥ i (if DM IS is started in round i) ignores edges added by the adversary after round i, i.e., commu∩(r−i+1)
nication is restricted to the graph Gr
= Gi ∩ Gi+1 ∩ . . . ∩ Gr . More detailed: At all times each node
12
is in exactly one of three sets, i.e., in the set M of MIS-nodes, in the set D of dominated nodes or in the set
U , i.e., the node is undecided. The algorithm can be started in round i with any configuration of states such
that M forms an independent set of Gi and each node in D has a neighbor in M in Gi . If started in round
i, the communication graph is always a subgraph of Gi , i.e., every edge that it uses for communication was
already an edge in Gi . To identify the current communication graph G∩R
r , we introduce a parameter R that
is initialized with zero and raised in every round. 6
Sending. Each node v ∈ M sends a mark to all nodes that were neighbors in the last R rounds, that is, to
all neighbors of v in the graph GR∩
r ; each node v ∈ U draws a random number and sends it to its neighbors
that were neighbors in the last R rounds.
After Receiving. Nodes that receive a mark change their state to dominated. Still undecided nodes that drew
a smaller number than all random numbers they received join M . At the end of the round, the parameter R
is increased by one.
Output. The algorithm returns the state of each node at the end of each round, i.e., it either returns mis,
dominated or undecided.
Algorithm 4 DM IS
Input:
Output:
Vars.:
(M, D)
(M, D)
M, D, U
R
Start: R = 0
(independent set, dominated nodes)
MIS-nodes, dominated nodes, undecided nodes
Communication is always restricted to GR∩
r
// No communication round needed
Round r of DM IS
1: U = V \ (M ∪ D)
2: switch v ∈ ? do
3:
case v ∈ M : send mark to all neighbors in GTr ∩
4:
case v ∈ U : send random number αv ∈ [0, 1] to all neighbors in GR∩
r
5: Receive random numbers {αu | u ∈ U ∩ NGR∩
(v)} and marks from all neighbors in GR∩
r
r
6: switch v ∈ ? do
7:
case mark received: join D
8:
case v ∈ U and αv < min{αu | u ∈ U ∩ NGR∩
(v)}: join M
r
9: R + +
// Intersect one more graph in the next round
10: Output (M, D)
Lemma 5.1. DM IS is T -dynamic for (MP , MC ), w.h.p., for a T ∈ O(log n).
First we prove that there is a T ∈ O(log n) such that after T − 1 rounds of DM IS , w.h.p., all nodes
are decided, i.e., either joined M or D. The proof is similar to the ’standard’ Luby analysis in [Win04,
MRNZ10], but needs additional care due to the dynamicity of the graph. As the graph changes, edges which
are needed to inform neighbors about a joining MIS node might not be there anymore in the next round and
the proofs in [Win04, MRNZ10] heavily rely on these edges. We adapt the proof and show that within two
rounds and in expectation one third of the edges between undecided nodes are removed in the intersection
graph, either because the adversary removes the edge or because one (or both) endpoints join M or D. Note
that, in the dynamic setting, we cannot guarantee that, in expectation, half of the edges are removed as it is
done in [Win04, MRNZ10].
Particularly, we show that when DM IS is started in round j on some input (M, D), then after executing
∩
T ∈ O(log n) rounds (i.e., after round j +T −1), w.h.p., there is no edge left in GTj+T
−1 with both endpoints
undecided. Then in the following round, all leftover undecided nodes either join D (if they have a neighbor
6
Note that a global parameter as R is not needed as every node can simply keep track of the current set of edges/neighbors it
still has to consider for communication.
13
+1∩
in M in GTj+T
+1 ) or otherwise they join M . To ease presentation, we write Mr , Dr and Ur for the state of
the set variables M , D, U in DM IS at the beginning of round r. Furthermore we define Hr := Gr∩
j+r [Ur ]
for each positive integer r.
Lemma 5.2. Given a dynamic graph, assume DM IS is started in round j on some input (M, D). Then for
each r ≥ 0 we have
2
E |E(Hr+2 )| |E(Hr )| ≤ |E(Hr )| .
3
Proof. We will show
that, in expectation, at least
one third of the edges of Hr are not contained in Hr+2 ,
i.e, we show E |E(Hr ) \ E(Hr+2 )| |E(Hr )| ≥ 31 |E(Hr )|. This is sufficient to prove the claim as
E(Hr+2 ) ⊆ E(Hr ). Therefore define the following set of edges
E ′ := {{v, w} ∈ E(Hr ) | {v, w} ∈ Er+1 and v, w ∈
/ Dr+1 } .
For {v, w} ∈ E ′ define the event (v → w)r as αv < αx for all x ∈ NHr (v) ∪ NHr (w) \ {v}) . We consider
two (non-disjoint) types of edges of Hr that are not contained in Hr+2 :
1. Edges that are not contained in E ′ ,
2. Edges that are removed due to an event (v → w)r for some {v, w} ∈ E ′ .
In the following we lower bound the expected number of edges of type (2) by |E ′ |/2. The event (v →
w)r says that the chosen random value of v in round r is smaller than those of all its neighbors in Hr as
well as those of all neighbors of w in Hr (without v of course). If the event (v → w)r occurs, v joins M
in round r and so w joins D in round r + 1. Note that v actually does join M as v ∈
/ Dr+1 implies that v
did not receive a mark from a neighbor in M in round r. Furthermore node w does indeed join D because
{v, w} ∈ Er+1 so that v can actually inform w about joining M . Thus event (v → w)r implies that all
incident edges of w in Hr (i.e., dUr (w) := |ΓHr (w)| many) will not be contained in the graph Hr+2 .
LetPX(v→w)r be the random variable with value dUr (w) if event (v → w)r occurs and 0 otherwise. Then
X = {v,w}∈E ′ X(v→w)r denotes the number of removed edges of type (2) (with some double counting
involved). We now lower bound E X |E(Hr )| . As we have assumed that for its changes at the beginning
of round r + 1, the adversary can not take into account the choice of the random values made in round r,
the probability of the event (v → w)r for {v, w} ∈ E ′ is at least 1/(dUr (v) + dUr (w)). Thus we can lower
bound as follows.
X
E X |E(Hr )| =
E[X(v→w)r |E(Hr )|] + E[X(w→v)r |E(Hr )|]
{v,w}∈E ′
=
X
P [(v → w)r ] · dUr (w) + P [(w → v)r ] · dUr (v)
X
X
{v,w}∈E ′
≥
{v,w}∈E ′
dUr (w)
dUr (v)
+
=
dUr (v) + dUr (w) dUr (w) + dUr (v)
1 = |E ′ | .
{v,w}∈E ′
To determine the expected edges that are removed we now take care of double counting: If for an edge
{v, w} of Hr there are x, y with {x, v} ∈ E ′ and {y, w} ∈ E ′ such that both (x → v)r and (y → w)r
holds, {v, w} is counted twice in X. Every edge in E(Hr ) \ E ′ is not contained in the graph Hr+2 .
However, we might have counted such an edge twice in X as follows; There might be v, w, x, y ∈ Ur with
{x, v}, {v, w}, {w, y} ∈ E(Hr ) such that (x → v)r , (y → w)r and {v, w} ∈
/ E ′ . Thus E[X]+ E (Hr )\E ′
counts each removed edge between undecided nodes up to three times (once by E (Hr ) \ E ′ and twice by
X). Hence the number of edges between undecided nodes that are removed in expectation is lower bounded
by
1
1
E[X] + E (Hr ) \ E ′ ≥
3
3
E ′ + E (Hr ) \ E ′
14
=
1
E (Hr ) .
3
Remark. The proof of Lemma 5.2 relies on a 2-oblivious adversary: If the adversary knew the random
values of round r, it could, e.g., delete all edges between nodes for which (v → w)r holds. Therefore, the
probability of event (v → w)r would be zero for all {v, w} ∈ E ′ .
To show that the algorithm terminates in O(log n) rounds we need the following lemma.
Lemma 5.3. For every c ∈ [0, 1) there is a T ∈ O(log K) such that for every series of random variables
K ≥ X0 ≥ X1 ≥ . . . with E[Xi+1 |Xi ] ≤ c · Xi , w.h.p., we have XT < 1.
Proof sketch: For 0 ≤ i ≤ T = O(log n) define the random variable Yi+1 that is 1 if Xi+1 ≤ (1/2+c/2)Xi
or Xi+1 < 1. Due to Markov’s inequality the probability that Yi equals 1 is constant. We have XT < 1 if at
least log2 K of the Yi ’s have value one and it is straightforward to show that this holds w.h.p.
Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3 imply the O(log n) ’runtime’ of DM IS .
Lemma 5.4. There is a T ∈ O(log n) such that for any dynamic graph and any input, after T − 1 rounds
of DM IS , w.h.p. all nodes are decided.
Proof. Assume DM IS is started in round j on some dynamic graph G0 , G1 , . . . with input (M, D). For
each i ≥ 0, let Xi be the random variable whose value is the number of edges in G2i∩
j+2i with both endpoints
2
2
in Uj+2i . We have n ≥ X0 ≥ X1 , . . . and by Lemma 5.2 E[Xi+1 |Xi ] ≤ 3 Xi holds. By Lemma 5.3,
there is a T ′ ∈ O log(n2 ) = O log n such that for any such sequence of random variables, w.h.p.,
2T ′ ∩ . Then in round
XT ′ < 1 holds, which means that there are no two undecided nodes adjacent in Gj+2T
′
′
j + 2T + 1, all leftover undecided nodes either join D or M . The statement in the lemma then holds for
T := 2T ′ + 2 = O(log n).
Note that Lemma 5.4 does not need any requirements on the input. However, in the proof of Lemma 5.1,
it is necessary that the input is a partial solution.
Proof of Lemma 5.1. Let T ∈ O(log n) be chosen as in Lemma 5.4. That is, after T − 1 rounds of DM IS ,
w.h.p. all nodes are decided, i.e., all nodes are either in M or D and do not change their status afterwards.
We now show that DM IS is T -dynamic, w.h.p.
Property A.1: Getting (M, D) as input, DM IS only adds nodes to these sets but will never delete a node
from them. Thus DM IS is input-extending, which proves A.1.
Property A.2: Let j ≥ T − 1 and the input (M, D) be a partial solution for (MP , MC ) in the graph
Gj−T +1 , i.e., M is an independent set in Gj−T +1 and every node in D has a neighbor in M in Gj−T +1 . Let
(M ′ , D ′ ) := DM IS jj−T +2 (M, D). We show the following two properties that imply property A.2 because,
w.h.p., no node is undecided in round j − T + 1.
∩T
M ′ is an independent set in G∩T
j , deterministically. Consider two nodes adjacent in Gj , i.e., adjacent in
every graph Gj−T +1 , . . . , Gj . As the input set M is an independent set in Gj−T +1 , they can not be both in
M in the beginning. Furthermore, they can not both join M in the same round as they are part of each others
neighborhood and only a node with the smallest random value among its neighbors may join M . If one of
the nodes joins M in some round (or already was in M in the beginning), then the other one joins D latest
in the next round. As nodes do not leave M or D again, there is no way for the two nodes to be both in M
in round j. Therefore, M ′ is an independent set in G∩T
j and this holds deterministically as it is not required
that all nodes are decided.
M ′ is a dominating set in G∪T
j , w.h.p. If a node is in D at the beginning, it is adjacent to a node in M in
Gj−T +1 , as the input (M, D) is a partial solution for (MP , MC ) in Gj−T +1 . An initially undecided node
joins D in one of the rounds j − T + 2, . . . , j only if it has been adjacent to a node in M in some graph
Gj−T +2 , . . . , Gj . As nodes do not leave M , it follows that any node which is in D ′ has been adjacent to a
node in M ′ in some graph Gj−T +1 , . . . , Gj , i.e., in the graph G∪T
j . In round j, w.h.p., there is no undecided
′
′
′
node left, i.e., all nodes not in M are in D . It follows that M is, w.h.p., a dominating set in G∪T
j .
15
5.2 The O(log n)-Network-Static MIS Algorithm SM IS
The framework presented in Section 3 applied to the MIS problem starts a new instance of DM IS in every
round. After T rounds it outputs the oldest instance and discards it. These instances should not start to
compute a solution from scratch if the dynamic graph does not change much. Instead each instance begins
its computation with a backbone independent set that does locally not change if the graph is locally static.
The algorithm that computes the backbone independent has to be network static (cf. Definition 3.3) and
here we present and analyze the network static algorithm SM IS (static MIS). It is strongly influenced by
Ghaffari’s algorithm [Gha16] with the crucial difference that nodes can leave the set of MIS nodes and
become undecided again. SM IS uses the current graph for all communication.
Algorithm 5 SM IS
Input:
Output:
Vars.:
(M, D)
(M, D)
M, D, U
p(v), δ(v)
Start: p(v) = 1/2
(independent set, dominated nodes)
MIS-nodes, dominated nodes, undecided nodes
desire-level, effective degree
// No communication round needed
Round r of SM IS
1: U = V \ (M ∪ D)
2: switch v ∈ ? do
3:
case v ∈ M : send mark to all neighbors in NGr (v)
4:
case v ∈ U : Become candidate with probability p(v).
Send p(v) and candidate-note to all neighbors in Gr .
5: Receive marks, desire-levels and candidate-notes from all neighbors in Gr .
If v ∈ U :
//Pupdate desire-level
δ(v) =
p(u)
u∈U∩NGr (v)
(
1
} if δ(v) ≥ 2
max{p(v)/2, 5n
p(v) =
min{2p(v), 1/2} if δ(v) < 2
6: switch v ∈ ? do
7:
case v ∈ U and mark received: join D
8:
case v ∈ U , no mark received, being candidate and no candidate-note received: join M
9:
case v ∈ M and mark received: join U
10:
case v ∈ D and no mark received: join U
11: Output (M, D)
SM IS: At all times, each node is in exactly one of three sets: In the set M of MIS-nodes, in the set
D of dominated nodes or in the set U of undecided nodes. Each node v has a desire-level p(v) which is
initially set to 1/2 and is updated in every round. It is upper bounded by 1/2 and lower bounded by 1/(5n).
P
In each round, the effective-degree of v, δ(v), is set to δ(v) = u∈N (v)∩U p(u) and is used to update v’s
desire-level. As long as v is decided, its desire-level does not influence the algorithm and thus it is not
updated until v becomes undecided again. pr (v) (δr (v)) denotes the desire-level (effective-degree) of v at
the beginning of round r before they are updated in the course of the round.
Sending. At the start of round r each node v in M sends a mark to all neighbors in Gr ; each node v in
U becomes a candidate with probability pr (v) and sends pr (v) and the information whether it became a
candidate to its neighbors in Gr .
After Receiving. Undecided nodes update their desire-level. Nodes that were in state undecided and received
a mark join the set D. Still undecided nodes that became a candidate and have no neighbor that is also a
candidate join M . Nodes in M that received a mark leave M and become undecided. Nodes in D which
loose their domination, i.e., do not receive a mark in the current round, become undecided.
16
Output. The algorithm returns the state of each node at the end of each round.
Lemma 5.5. SM IS is (T, α = 2)-network-static for (MP , MC ), w.h.p., for a T ∈ O(log n).
We show that after O(log n) rounds of SM IS, a node v is decided, w.h.p., if its 2-neighborhood is static,
and does not change its output as long as its 2-neighborhood is static. The core ideas of the proof are
contained in the purely local analysis of [Gha16]. However, the proof needs to be adapted in several places.
Most important is the change of the definition of golden rounds of type two that is needed because SM IS
is a pipelined version of the algorithm in [Gha16]. Further, we need a more careful reasoning due to the
facts that a node might not have desire level 1/2 when its neighborhood becomes static and the cap of desire
levels at 1/(5n).
Lemma 5.6. After O(log n) rounds of SM IS, a node v is decided, w.h.p., if its 2-neighborhood is static,
and does not change its output as long as its 2-neighborhood is static.
Proof. We first show that a node v does not change its output once it is 6= ⊥ and if its 2-neighborhood is
static. A node v leaves M only if it becomes adjacent to a node that has already been in M as well. This
does not happen if v’s 1-neighborhood is static. Node v may only leave D if it either looses a neighbor
(due to a graph change) which was in M or if some neighbor w of v leaves M . The first will not happen if
v’s 1-neighborhood does not change, the second, as seen before, does not happen if w’s 1-neighborhood is
static, which is the case if v’s 2-neighborhood is static.
To show that a node is decided fast, w.h.p., let c ≥ 1. We show that there is a β such that when SM IS is
started in any round j with some input on a dynamic graph which is static in the 2-neighborhood of a node
v ∈ Vj , the probability that v is still undecided after β log n rounds is at most n1c .
We say an undecided node u is low-degree if δr (u) < 2, and high-degree otherwise. We define two
types of golden rounds for an undecided node v:
(1) rounds in which δr (v) < 2 and pr (v) = 1/2,
(2) rounds in which δr (v) ≥ 1 and at least δr (v)/10 of it is contributed by low-degree neighbors
that did not receive a mark at the beginning of the round.
For the sake of analysis, we assume that node v keeps track of the number of golden rounds of each type it
has been in. We show the following two statements:
β
log n.
I. After β log n rounds, either v is decided or at least one of its two golden round counts reached 13
II. If v is still undecided and r a golden round, with probability at least 1/200, v gets decided in round r or
r + 1.
If r is a golden round, we call the rounds r and r + 1 a golden phase. By II, the probability that v does
β
log n golden rounds, there are at least
not get decided in a golden phase is at most (1 − 1/200). Among 13
β
26 log n golden phases (in the worst case, both rounds of a golden phase are golden rounds).
β
It follows that the probability that v is not decided after at least 13
log n golden rounds (that is by I after
β log n rounds) is at most
1
1−
200
β
26
log n
β
log n
− 200·26
≤e
β
1 200·26
1
≤
≤ c
n
n
for
β ≥ 200 · 26 · c .
Recall that Ur denotes the set of undecided nodes at the beginning of round r. We write Ur (v) for the
set of undecided neighbors of v at the beginning of round r. A decided node will not get undecided as long
as its 1-neighborhood is static, so a decided neighbor of v does not get undecided if v’s 2-neighborhood is
static. Hence, one has Ur+1 (v) ⊆ Ur (v) (this is also valid for the algorithm in [Gha16], where decided
nodes are considered as removed from the graph).
17
Proof of I. We consider the first β log n rounds after the start of SM IS. Let g1 and g2 be the number of
golden rounds of type 1 and type 2, respectively, during that period. We assume that after β log n rounds, v
β
β
log n, and show that g2 ≥ 13
log n.
is not decided and g1 ≤ 13
Let h be the number of rounds in which δr (v) ≥ 2. We first show that if less than 1/13 of the β log n
rounds are g1 rounds then almost half of the rounds (actually a 6/13 fraction of the rounds minus an absolute
value of 21 log 52 n) are rounds with δr (v) ≥ 2, i.e., we lower bound h. Then, in a second step we show that
h is upper bounded by a function of g2 which then implies the desired lower bound for g2 .
We first lower bound h. If δr (v) < 2, either pr (v) = 1/2, which means that r is a type-1 golden
round and pr (v) does not change, or pr (v) < 1/2 and pr (v) will increase by a factor of 2 (capped by
1
1/2). As pr (v) is between 5n
and 1/2, the number of factor 2 increases of pr (v) is at most the number of
5
factor 2 decreases plus log 2 n (every factor 2 decrease cancels one factor 2 increase, leaving at most log 52 n
further increases without exceeding 1/2). So if we take the total of β log n rounds, subtract the type-1
golden rounds and the ’log 25 n-slack’, in at most half of the remaining rounds, the desire-level can increase,
because for each increasing round there must be a decreasing counterpart. This means that there are at least
5
1
2 (β log n − g1 − log 2 n) decreasing rounds, i.e., rounds with δr (v) ≥ 2. It follows
β
5 g1 ≤ 13 6β
1
5
1
h ≥ (β log n − g1 − log n) ≥
log n − log n .
2
2
13
2
2
(2)
Now upper bound h with a function of g2 . If δr (v) ≥ 1 and r is not a type-2 golden round, one has
X
X
X
δr+1 (v) =
pr+1 (u) =
pr+1 (u) +
pr+1 (u)
u∈Ur+1 (v)
u∈Ur+1 (v)
δr (u)<2
u∈Ur+1 (v)
δr (u)≥2
For u ∈ Ur+1 (v) with δr (u) < 2 we have pr+1 (u) ≤ 2pr (u) . For u ∈ Ur+1 (v) with δr (u) ≥ 2 one has
1
. As v has at most n neighbors, the contribution of nodes u with
either pr+1 (u) = 12 pr (u) or pr+1 (u) = 5n
1
pr+1 (u) = 5n to δr+1 (v) is at most 1/5. Hence we get
X
δr+1 (v) ≤ 2
pr (u) +
u∈Ur+1 (v)
δr (u)<2
1
2
X
pr (u) +
u∈Ur+1 (v)
δr (u)≥2
1
.
5
(3)
As r is not a type-2 golden round and δr (v) ≥ 1, one has
X
u∈Ur+1 (v)
δr (u)<2
pr (u) ≤
1
δr (v),
10
X
pr (u) ≤ δr (v),
u∈Ur+1 (v)
δr (u)≥2
1
1
≤ δr (v) .
5
5
(4)
Using the inequalities in (4) to upper bound the terms in Equation (3) we obtain
δr+1 (v) ≤ 2
1
1
1
4
δr (v) + δr (v) + δr (v) = δr (v) .
10
2
5
5
Thus every round in which δr (v) is increased to a value larger than 2 is a type-2 golden round. The effect
of these rounds is canceled by at most four rounds with δr (v) ≥ 2 which are not golden rounds of type
2, because in these rounds, the effective degree shrinks by a factor of at least 4/5 whereas in a golden
round it is increased by at most a factor of 2 and (4/5)4 · 2 < 1. Apart from these 5g2 rounds that are
either golden rounds or cancellation counterparts, in every remaining round with δr (v) ≥ 2, the effective
degree is decreased at least by a 4/5 factor. Due to δr (v) ≤ n this can happen at most log 5 n times while
4
keeping δr (v) ≥ 2 . It follows that the number of rounds with δr (v) ≥ 2 is at most log 5 n + 5g2 , i.e.,
h ≤ log 5 n + 5g2 . Together with h ≥
4
6β
13
log n − 21 log 52 n (Equation (2)) we get g2 ≥
18
β
13
4
log n.
Proof of II. In a type-1 golden round, v becomes a candidate with probability 1/2. The probability that no
undecided neighbor of v becomes a candidate is
Y
u∈U (v)
P
(1)
1
(1 − pr (u)) ≥ 4− u∈U (v) pr (u) ≥ 4−δr (v) ≥ 4−2 =
.
16
So if v does not receive a mark in round r, it joins M with probability at least 1/32 > 1/200 in a type-1
golden round. Otherwise (if v receives a mark), it joins D in the next round.
Let L be the set of v’s undecided, low-degree neighbors that did not receive a mark. In a type-2 golden
round, the probability that there is a candidate in L is at least
P
Y
1−
(1 − pr (u)) ≥ 1 − e− u∈L pr (u) ≥ 1 − e−δr (v)/10 ≥ 1 − e−1/10 > 0.08 .
u∈L
If u ∈ L is a candidate, the probability that no undecided neighbor of u is also a candidate is at least
Q
−δr (u) > 1 . In this case, as u did not receive a mark at the beginning of the
w∈U (u) (1 − pr (w)) ≥ 4
16
round, it will join M (line 8) and therefore v joins D in the next round, because v and u stay adjacent due to
the assumption that the 1-neighborhood of v is static. So the probability that one of v’s neighbors joins M
(and thus v joins D in the next round) is at least 0.08/16 = 1/200.
Before we prove Lemma 5.5, we shortly describe what it means for an output vector φ to be partial
packing and partial covering for the MIS problem. If there are no two adjacent nodes in the state mis, setting
all nodes with φv = ⊥ to the state dominated yields an extension in which the LCL condition of MP is
satisfied for all nodes with φv 6= ⊥. On the other hand, such an extension can only exist if no two mis
nodes are adjacent. Furthermore, the LCL condition of MC is satisfied if and only if every node in the state
dominated has an mis neighbor. If, for some output φ, all nodes in the state dominated already have an mis
neighbor their LCL condition is also satisfied for all extensions of φ. Conversely, if one dominated node
in φ does not have an mis neighbor in φ its LCL condition is violated in the extension which sets all nodes
with φv = ⊥ to the state dominated. Thus, φ is partial packing for MP if and only if no two mis nodes are
adjacent and partial covering for MC if and only if every dominated node is adjacent to an mis node.
Proof of Lemma 5.5. Property B.1: If at the beginning of round r, there are two nodes in M adjacent
in Gr , both will receive a mark (cf. line 3 in Algorithm 5) and leave M (line 9) by the end of the round.
Additionally, a node from U only joins M if it did not receive a mark, i.e., if it has no neighbor in M in
Gr . Finally, no two adjacent nodes from U join M in the same round because a node only joins M if it
has no other candidate in its neighborhood. If at the start of round r, there is a node in D not adjacent to a
node in M , it will not receive a mark and leave D (line 10) by the end of the round. Additionally, a node
from U joins D in round r only if it received a mark, i.e., has a neighbor in M in Gr . Property B.1 holds
independently of the choice of T .
Property B.2: Let v ∈ Vr and T = O(log n) be the time until v is decided, w.h.p., if SM IS is started in
round r and v’s 2-neighborhood is static (cf. Lemma 5.6). Let r2 ≥ r+T such that Gl [N2 (v)] = Gl′ [N2 (v)]
for all l, l′ ∈ [r, r2 ] (for r2 < r + T , B.2 holds trivially). Then, by Lemma 5.6, v is decided after round
r + T , w.h.p., and does not change its output as long as its 2-neighborhood is static, i.e., at least until round
r2 .
5.3 Proof of Theorem 1.3
Theorem 1.1 with the O(log n)-network-static algorithm SM IS for (MP , MC ) (cf. Lemma 5.5) and the
O(log n)-dynamic algorithm DM IS (cf. Lemma 5.1) for (MP , MC ) implies the result.
Remark. The analysis of DM IS and SM IS (in particular the proof of Lemma 5.4) relies on a 2-oblivious
adversary.
19
6 Basic Randomized Coloring Algorithm for Static Graphs
The following algorithm is a variant of the simplest randomized distributed node coloring algorithm (in static
graphs). Usually (e.g. in [BEPS12, Joh99]), this algorithm is described to operate in phases, each consisting
of two communication rounds: In the first round of a phase, each uncolored node picks a tentative uniformly
at random color c from its palette and sends it to its neighbor. It keeps c as its permanent color if none of
its uncolored neighbors chose c in the same round. If it keeps a color permanently it informs its neighbors
about its permanent color in the next round and deletes the received colors from its palette. Initially, the
color palette of a node v is set to [d(v) + 1].
With a slight adaption we can change this algorithm to an algorithm consisting of only one type of
round. This has the advantage that this algorithm can also be used in an asynchronous wake-up model
without needing a global clock that tells each node which type of round to execute.
Algorithm 6 BASIC C OLORING
Start: φv = ⊥, Pv = {1}
// No communication round needed
Round r of BASIC C OLORING
1: switch φv = ? do
2:
case φv = ⊥: Pick tentative color cv ∈ Pv uniformly at random and send it to neighbors.
3:
case φv 6= ⊥: Send φv to neighbors.
4: Receive fixed colors Fv = {φw | w ∈ N (v)} and tentative colors Sv = {cw | w ∈ N (v)}.
5: Pv = [d(v) + 1] \ Fv
// Update color palette
6: switch φv = ? do
7:
case φv = ⊥:
8:
if cv ∈ Pv and cv ∈
/ Sv then φv = cv else keep φv = ⊥.
9:
case φv 6= ⊥: Do nothing.
10: Output φ
We believe that the following proofs are well known folklore but we could not find a publication that
contains them.
Lemma 6.1. In one round of Algorithm 6, each node gets colored with probability at least 1/64 or its color
palette shrinks by a factor of at least 1/4.
Proof. Fix some arbitrary round and an uncolored node v. Let Pv be v’s color palette and U (v) the set of
v’s uncolored neighbors. We assume |U (v)| ≥ 1 (otherwise, v will be colored in the current round as there
will be no conflicts with v’s color choice). It follows that also U (u) ≥ 1 for all u ∈ U (v), as v ∈ U (u). For
all nodes w ∈ V one has |Pw | ≥ |U (w)| + 1. This holds at the beginning of the algorithm as Pw is initially
set to [d(w) + 1]. In the following rounds, a color may only be removed from Pw if it is taken by a neighbor.
Therefore, v and its uncolored neighbors have palettes of size at least 2.
For c ∈ Pv , define the weight of c as
wc :=
X
{u∈U (v)|c∈Pu }
1
.
|Pu |
Let Zv be the set of those colors in Pv which have been permanently chosen by a neighbor of v in the last
round (these are the colors which will be deleted from Pv in the current round). Call a color c ∈ Pv good if
c∈
/ Z and wc ≤ 2. For a good color c we have
Y
Pr (v keeps c | v chose c as tentative color) =
{u∈U (v)|c∈Pu }
20
1−
1
|Pu |
(1)
1
≥ 4−wc ≥ 4−2 = .
4
Because of
X
c∈Pv
wc =
X
u∈U (v)
X
c∈Pu ∩Pv
1
|Pu |
!
=
X |Pu ∩ Pv |
≤ |U (v)| ,
|Pu |
u∈U (v)
colors from Pv can have a weight larger than 2. So in addition to the colors in
it follows that at most |U (v)|
2
|U (v)|
≤ |P2v | it follows that in Pv , at least |Pv |−|Zv |− |P2v |
Zv , at most 2 colors in Pv are not good. With |U (v)|
2
colors are good.
When we assume that |Zv | ≤ |P4v | (i.e., the color palette of v shrinks by a factor of at most 1/4), then at
least |Pv | − |Zv | − |P2v | ≥ |P4v | colors are good. So in this case, the probability for choosing a good color
is at least 1/4, which means that the overall probability for v being colored is at least 1/64. Therefore, if
the color palette of v does not shrink by a factor of at least 1/4, v gets colored with probability at least
1/64.
With Lemma 6.1 we can prove the O(log n) runtime of Algorithm 6.
Lemma 6.2. There is a T ∈ O(log n) such that after T rounds of Algorithm 6, w.h.p. all nodes are colored.
Proof. Fix a constant b ≥ 1 and set T1 := log 3 n4 , T2 := 64(b + 1) ln(n) and T := T1 + T2 = O(log n).
4
For each node v, denote by Av the event that v is not colored after T rounds. For Av to come true, there can
have been at most T1 rounds in which v’s color palette shrinks by a factor of at least 1/4, because after T1
T
such rounds, one has |Pv | ≤ n 43 1 = 1 (initially it is |Pv | ≤ n), which means that v’s color palette can
not shrink another time without v getting colored (a node will get colored before its palette gets empty). By
Lemma 6.1 it follows that there must have been at least T2 rounds in which v got colored with probability
T2
1
1 T2
. With a union bound over all nodes, we
) ≤ e− 64 = nb+1
at least 1/64, so we obtain Pr(Av ) ≤ (1 − 64
can upper bound the probability that there is an uncolored node left after T rounds:
!
[
1
n
Au ≤ b+1 = b .
Pr
n
n
u∈V
It follows that with probability at least 1 −
1
,
nb
all nodes are colored after T rounds.
21
References
[AAL+ 16] J. Augustine, C. Avin, M. Liaee, G. Pandurangan, and R. Rajaraman. Information spreading in
dynamic networks under oblivious adversaries. In Proc. 30th Symp. on Distributed Computing
(DISC), pages 399–413, 2016.
[ABI86]
N. Alon, L. Babai, and A. Itai. A fast and simple randomized parallel algorithm for the maximal
independent set problem. J. of Algorithms, 7(4):567–583, 1986.
[AGKM15] M. Ahmadi, A. Ghoselahi, F. Kuhn, and A.R. Molla. The cost of global broadcast in dynamic
radio networks. In Proc. 19th Conf. on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS), pages
7:1–7:17, 2015.
[AKL08]
C. Avin, M. Koucký, and Z. Lotker. How to explore a fast-changing world (cover time of a
simple random walk on evolving graphs). In Proc. 35th Int. Coll. on Automata, Languages and
Programming (ICALP, pages 121–132, 2008.
[APRU15] J. Augustine, G. Pandurangan, P. Robinson, and E. Upfal. Distributed agreement in dynamic
peer-to-peer networks. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 81(7):1088–1109, 2015.
[APSPS92] B. Awerbuch, B. Patt-Shamir, D. Peleg, and M. E. Saks. Adapting to asynchronous dynamic
networks. In Proc. of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC),
pages 557–570, 1992.
[AS88]
B. Awerbuch and M. Sipser. Dynamic networks are as fast as static networks. In Proc. 29th
Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 206–219, 1988.
[BCF09]
H. Baumann, P. Crescenzi, and P. Fraigniaud. Parsimonious flooding in dynamic graphs. In
Proc. of 28th Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pages 260–269, 2009.
[BE13]
L. Barenboim and M. Elkin. Distributed Graph Coloring: Fundamentals and Recent Developments. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2013.
[BEPS12]
L. Barenboim, M. Elkin, S. Pettie, and J. Schneider. The locality of distributed symmetry
breaking. In Proc. 53th Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2012.
[CFMS15] A. Casteigts, P. Flocchini, B. Mans, and N. Santoro. Shortest, fastest, and foremost broadcast
in dynamic networks. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 26(4):499–522, 2015.
[CHHK16] K. Censor-Hillel, E. Haramaty, and Z.S. Karnin. Optimal dynamic distributed MIS. In Proc.
35th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pages 217–226, 2016.
[CMPS09] A. E. F. Clementi, A. Monti, F. Pasquale, and R. Silvestri. Broadcasting in dynamic radio
networks. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 75(4):213–230, 2009.
[Dij74]
E.W. Dijkstra. Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control. Communications of the
ACM, 11:643–644, 1974.
[DMP15]
A. Das Sarma, A. R. Molla, and G. Pandurangan. Distributed computation in dynamic networks
via random walks. Theor. Comput. Sci., 581:45–66, 2015.
[Dol00]
S. Dolev. Self-Stabilization. MIT Press, 2000.
[DPR+ 13] C. Dutta, G. Pandurangan, R. Rajaraman, Z. Sun, and E. Viola. On the complexity of information spreading in dynamic networks. In Proc. 24th ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms
(SODA), pages 717–736, 2013.
22
[DR14]
O. Denysyuk and L. E. T. Rodrigues. Random walks on evolving graphs with recurring topologies. In Proc. 28th Symp. on Distributed Computing (DISC), pages 333–345, 2014.
[FKP11]
P. Fraigniaud, A. Korman, and D. Peleg. Local distributed decision. In FOCS, pages 708–717.
IEEE Computer Society, 2011.
[FNC15]
M. Függer, T. Nowak, and B. Charron-Bost. Diffusive clock synchronization in highly dynamic
networks. In Proc. 49th Conf. on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), pages 1–6, 2015.
[Gha16]
M. Ghaffari. An improved distributed algorithm for maximal independent set. In Proc. 27th
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 270–277, 2016.
[HK11]
B. Haeupler and D. Karger. Faster information dissemination in dynamic networks via network
coding. In Proc. 30th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pages 381–
390, 2011.
[ISWW09] R. Ingram, P. Shields, J. E. Walter, and J. L. Welch. An asynchronous leader election algorithm
for dynamic networks. In Proc. of 23rd IEEE Int. Symp. on Parallel and Distributed Processing
(IPDPS), pages 1–12, 2009.
[Joh99]
Ö. Johansson. Simple distributed Delta+1-coloring of graphs. Inf. Process. Lett., 70(5):229–
232, 1999.
[JYZ17]
I. Jahja, H. Yu, and Y. Zhao. Some lower bounds in dynamic networks with oblivious adversaries. In Proc. 31st Symp. on Distributed Computing (DISC), pages 29:1–29:16, 2017.
[KLLO10] F. Kuhn, C. Lenzen, T. Locher, and R. Oshman. Optimal gradient clock synchronization in
dynamic networks. In Proc. 29th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC),
pages 430–439, 2010.
[KLO10]
F. Kuhn, N. Lynch, and R. Oshman. Distributed computation in dynamic networks. In Proc.
42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 513–522, 2010.
[KLO11]
F. Kuhn, T. Locher, and R. Oshman. Gradient clock synchronization in dynamic networks.
Theory Comput. Syst., 49(4):781–816, 2011.
[KMO11]
F. Kuhn, Y. Moses, and R. Oshman. Coordinated consensus in dynamic networks. In Proc.
Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pages 1–10, 2011.
[LSW09]
C. Lenzen, J. Suomela, and R. Wattenhofer. Local algorithms: Self-stabilization on speed.
In Proc. 11th Symp. on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS), pages
17–34, 2009.
[Lub86]
M. Luby. A simple parallel alg. for the maximal ind. set problem. SIAM J. Comp., 15:1036–
1053, 1986.
[MCS13]
O. Michail, I. Chatzigiannakis, and P. G. Spirakis. Naming and counting in anonymous unknown dynamic networks. In Proc. 15th Symp. on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS), pages 281–295, 2013.
[MCS14]
O. Michail, I. Chatzigiannakis, and P. G. Spirakis. Causality, influence, and computation in possibly disconnected synchronous dynamic networks. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput., 74(1):2016–
2026, 2014.
[MRNZ10] M.Yves, J. M. Robson, S.-D. Nasser, and A. Zemmari. An optimal bit complexity randomized
distributed mis algorithm (extended abstract). In Proc. Structural Information and Communication Complexity (SIROCCO), pages 323–337, 2010.
23
[NS93]
M. Naor and L. J. Stockmeyer. What can be computed locally? In STOC, pages 184–193.
ACM, 1993.
[OSM04]
R. Olfati-Saber and R. M. Murray. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching
topology and time-delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(9):1520–1533, 2004.
[OW05]
R. O’Dell and R. Wattenhofer. Information dissemination in highly dynamic graphs. In Proc.
of 9th Joint Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computing (DIALM-POMC), pages 104–110,
2005.
[Pel00]
D. Peleg. Distributed Computing: A Locality-sensitive Approach. Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics, 2000.
[RB04]
W. Ren and R. W. Beard. Consensus of information under dynamically changing interaction
topologies. In Proc. of American Control Conference, pages 4939–4944, 2004.
[San15]
N. Santoro. Time to change: On distributed computing in dynamic networks (keynote). In
Proc. 19th Conf. on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS), pages 3:1–3:14, 2015.
[Win04]
A. Windsor. A simple proof that finding a maximal independent set in a graph is in NC. Inf.
Process. Lett., 92(4):185–187, 2004.
[YZJ16]
H. Yu, Y. Zhao, and I. Jahja. The cost of unknown diameter in dynamic networks. In Proc. 28th
ACM Symp. on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA), pages 405–416, 2016.
24
| 8cs.DS
|
THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL CENTRALIZER CONJECTURE
arXiv:1802.04685v2 [math.AC] 20 Feb 2018
VERED MOSKOWICZ
Abstract. A result by C. C.-A. Cheng, J. H. Mckay and S. S.-S. Wang says
the following: Suppose Jac(A, B) ∈ C∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈ C[x, y].
Then w ∈ C[A].
We show that in CMW’s result it is possible to replace C by any field
of characteristic zero, and we conjecture the following ’two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over D’: Suppose Jac(A, B) ∈ D ∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0
for A, B, w ∈ D[x, y], D is an integral domain of characteristic zero. Then
w ∈ D[A].
We show that if the famous two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture is true,
then the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture is true.
1
Introduction
Throughout this note, k denotes a field of characteristic zero, D denotes an integral
domain of characteristic zero (D is commutative) with field of fractions Q(D). The
group of invertible elements of a ring R will be denoted by R∗ .
In [6, Theorem 1], C. C.-A. Cheng, J. H. Mckay and S. S.-S. Wang have shown
that ‘the centralizer with respect to the Jacobian’ of an element A ∈ C[x, y] which
has a Jacobian mate, equals the polynomial ring in A over C: Suppose Jac(A, B) ∈
C∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈ C[x, y]. Then w ∈ C[A].
We show that C can be replaced by k.
Then we conjecture that k can be replaced by any integral domain of characteristic zero, and call this ’the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over D’: Suppose
Jac(A, B) ∈ D∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈ D[x, y]. Then w ∈ D[A].
The famous two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture says that every k-algebra endomorphism f : (x, y) 7→ (p, q) of k[x, y] having an invertible Jacobian, Jac(p, q) :=
px qy − py qx ∈ k[x, y]∗ = k ∗ , is an automorphism of k[x, y]; it was raised by O. H.
Keller [13], actually over Z not over k.
We show that if the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture is true then the twodimensional Centralizer Conjecture is true. Therefore, if the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture is false for some D, then the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture is false. We ’believe’ that the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture is true, so
there should be no counterexample to the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture.
2
CMW’s theorem over k
We will show in two ways that in CMW’s theorem it is possible to replace C by k.
2.1
First way: Independent of the original CMW’s theorem
We will apply the following observation of E. Formanek.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14R15, 16W20; Secondary 13F20, 16S32.
Key words and phrases. Jacobian Conjecture, Jacobian mate, automorphism pair, Dixmier
Conjecture, Weyl algebras, Centralizers.
1
2
VERED MOSKOWICZ
Proposition 2.1 (Formanek’s observation). Let F be any field. Assume that
C, D ∈ F [x, y] are algebraically dependent over F . Then there exist h ∈ F [x, y]
and u(t), v(t) ∈ F [t], such that C = u(h) and D = v(h).
Proof. The proof of Formanek can be found in [16]. We wish to mention that it uses
Lüroth’s theorem, a sharpening of E. Noether (characteristic zero) and A. Schinzel
(arbitrary field); those three results can be found in [20, first chapter].
The following is a known result due to Jacobi (1841); we will only need the
second statement of it.
Theorem 2.2 (Jacobi’s theorem). Let F be any field, C, D ∈ F [x, y].
(1) If C and D are algebraically dependent over F , then Jac(C, D) = 0.
(2) Assume that F is of characteristic zero. If Jac(C, D) = 0, then C and D
are algebraically dependent over F .
Proof. See [19, page 8] or [14, pages 19-20].
Actually, in (2) of Jacobi’s theorem, the base field F can be either a field of
characteristic zero or a field of large enough characteristic, as is shortly explained
in [19, page 8]. However, we are only interested in the zero characteristic case,
since we are interested in the (two-dimensional) Jacobian Conjecture, which has
a counterexample over a field of prime characteristic P , for example, (x, y) 7→
(x + xP , y).
Now we are ready to prove CMW’s result over k:
Theorem 2.3 (CMW’s theorem over k). Suppose Jac(A, B) ∈ k ∗ and Jac(A, w) =
0 for A, B, w ∈ k[x, y]. Then w ∈ k[A].
Proof. Jac(A, w) = 0, so by Jacobi’s theorem, Theorem 2.2 (2), we obtain that A
and w are algebraically dependent over k.
By Formanek’s observation, Proposition 2.1, applied to A and w we obtain that
there exist h ∈ k[x, y] and u(t), v(t) ∈ k[t], such that A = u(h) and w = v(h).
Then, u′ (h) Jac(h, B) = Jac(u(h), B) = Jac(A, B) ∈ k ∗ , where the first equality
can be easily proved. Therefore, u′ (h) ∈ k ∗ (and Jac(h, B) ∈ k ∗ ).
Write u(t) = cm tm + cm−1 tm−1 + · · · + c2 t2 + c1 t + c0 , cj ∈ k, so u′ (t) =
mcm tm−1 + (m − 1)cm−1 tm−2 + · · · + 2c2 t + c1 , and then u′ (h) = mcm hm−1 + (m −
1)cm−1 hm−2 + · · · + 2c2 h + c1 .
From u′ (h) ∈ k ∗ , we obtain that mcm hm−1 +(m−1)cm−1 hm−2 +· · ·+2c2 h+c1 ∈
∗
k , which implies that mcm = (m − 1)cm−1 = . . . = 2c2 = 0, c1 ∈ k ∗ , and c0 ∈ k.
Since k is of characteristic zero, we necessarily have cm = cm−1 = . . . = c2 = 0.
Therefore, u(t) = c1 t + c0 , c1 ∈ k ∗ , and c0 ∈ k, so A = u(h) = c1 h + c0 .
A−c0
0
Then, h = A−c
c1 , which shows that w = v(h) = v( c1 ) ∈ k[A].
The above proof of Theorem 2.3 (which is based on Formanek’s observation) is
independent of [6, Theorem 1], so it can serve as another proof for [6, Theorem 1].
Our proof of Theorem 2.3 is not valid if we replace k by a field of large enough
characteristic (= a characteristic for which Jacobi’s theorem, Theorem 2.2 (2), is
valid); indeed, although Formanek’s observation is valid for any field, we needed
zero characteristic for ’jcj = 0 implies cj = 0, 2 ≤ j ≤ m’, and we do not have
control on m.
2.2
Second way: Dependent on the original CMW’s theorem
We can prove CMW’s theorem over k, Theorem 2.3, in a way which is not based
on Formanek’s observation, but it relies on the original proof [6, Theorem 1]. For
convenience, we will divide our proof to three steps:
THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL CENTRALIZER CONJECTURE
3
• Step 1: Replace C by an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.
• Step 2: Prove the result for any sub-field of an algebraically closed field of
characteristic zero.
• Step 3: Consider k as a sub-field of k̄, where k̄ is an algebraic closure of k.
Proposition 2.4 (Step 1). Let L be an algebraically closed field of characteristic
zero. Suppose Jac(A, B) ∈ L∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈ L[x, y]. Then
w ∈ L[A].
Proof. The proof of the original CMW’s theorem [6, Theorem 1] is still valid if we
replace C by L. Indeed, that proof uses three results: Jacobi’s theorem, Theorem
2.2 (1), [22, Theorem 1] and [2, Corollary 1.5, p. 74]. In order to replace C by any
algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, it is enough to check that each of
these three results are valid over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero;
indeed:
• Theorem 2.2 (1) is over any field.
• [22, Theorem 1] is over any ring.
• [2, Corollary 1.5, p. 74] is over an algebraically closed field of characteristic
zero.
Proposition 2.5 (Step 2). Let L be an algebraically closed field of characteristic
zero, and let K ⊆ L be any sub-field of L.
Suppose Jac(A, B) ∈ K ∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈ K[x, y]. Then w ∈
K[A].
P
Proof. w ∈ K[x, y], so we can write w = sj=0 wj y j , for some wj ∈ K[x], 0 ≤ j ≤ s.
Pt
A ∈ K[x, y], so we can write A = l=0 Al y l , for some Al ∈ K[x], 0 ≤ l ≤ t.
∗
A, B, w ∈ K[x, y] ⊆ L[x, y] satisfy Jac(A, B) ∈ K ∗ ⊆
PrL andi Jac(A, w) = 0, so
Proposition 2.4 implies that w ∈ L[A], namely, w = i=0 ci A for some ci ∈ L,
0 ≤ i ≤ r.
We will show that for every 0 P
≤ i ≤ r, ci ∈ K, by induction
on r:
P
If r = 0, then w = c0 . Then sj=0 wj y j = c0 , so sj=0 wj y j − c0 = 0, namely,
Ps
j
j=1 wj y + (w0 − c0 ) = 0. As an equation in L[x, y] = L[x][y], we get w0 − c0 = 0
and wj = 0, 1 ≤ j ≤ s. Hence K[x] ∋ w0 = c0 ∈ L, so c0 ∈ L ∩ K[x] = K.
If
Ptr = 1, then w = c0 + c1 A. On the one hand, w = c0 + c1 A = c0 +
c1 ( l=0 Al y l ) = c0 + c1 (A0 + A1 y + · · · + At−1 y t−1 + At y t ) = (c0 + c1 A0 ) +
c1 A1 y + · · · + c1 At−1 y t−1 + c1 At y t ; as an element of L[x][y] its (0, 1)-degree
equals
Ps
j
t and its (0, 1)-leading term is c1 At y t . On the other hand, w =
j=0 wj y =
s−1
s
w0 + w1 y + · · · + ws−1 y
+ ws y ; as an element of K[x][y] ⊆ L[x][y] its (0, 1)degree equals s and its (0, 1)-leading term is ws y s . Combining the two yields that
s
t = s and c1 At = ws . Hence c1 = w
At ∈ K(x), so c1 ∈ L ∩ K(x) = K. From
w = c0 + c1 A, we get c0 = w − c1 A ∈ K[x, y]. Hence c0 ∈ L ∩ K[x, y] = K, so
c0 ∈ K. Therefore, we obtained that w = c0 + c1 A ∈ K[A].
Pr
Pr
Pt
i
l i
If r ≥ 2: On the one hand, w =
i=0 ci A =
i=0 ci (
l=0 Al y ) = c0 +
Pt
P
t
l r
l
c1 ( l=0 Al y )+· · ·+cr ( l=0 Al y ) ; as an element of L[x][y] its (0,P1)-degree equals
s
tr and its (0, 1)-leading term is cr Art y tr . On the other hand, w = j=0 wj y j ; as an
element of K[x][y] ⊆ L[x][y] its (0, 1)-degree equals s and its (0, 1)-leading term is
ws
ws y s . Combining the two yields that tr = s and cr Art = ws . Hence cr = A
r ∈ K(x),
t
so cr ∈ L ∩ K(x) = K.
P
Then r−1
c Ai = w − cr Ar ∈ K[x, y]. We can apply the induction hypothesis
Pr−1 i=0i i
on i=0 ci A and P
obtain that for every 0 ≤ i ≤ r − 1, ci ∈ K. Therefore, we
r
obtained that w = i=0 ci Ai ∈ K[A].
4
VERED MOSKOWICZ
Now we present a second proof for CMW’s theorem over k, Theorem 2.3:
Proposition 2.6 (Step 3, second proof for CMW’s theorem over k). Suppose
Jac(A, B) ∈ k ∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈ k[x, y]. Then w ∈ k[A].
Proof. Let k̄ be an algebraic closure of k. We have, k ⊆ k̄ with k̄ an algebraically
closed field of characteristic zero. Apply Proposition 2.5 and get that w ∈ k[A].
3
The two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture
For u, v ∈ R[x, y], R a commutative ring, we will use the following usual terminology:
• If Jac(u, v) ∈ R[x, y]∗ = R∗ , then we say that u has a Jacobian mate in
R[x, y], v (and vice versa), and u, v is a Jacobian pair (in R[x, y]).
• If (x, y) 7→ (u, v) is an automorphism of R[x, y], then we say that u, v is an
automorphism pair (in R[x, y]). (An automorphism pair is a Jacobian pair,
since the Jacobian of an automorphism pair is invertible in R[x, y]).
Also, we will use the following non-usual terminology: If Jac(u, v) = 0, then we say
that v is in ’the centralizer of u with respect to the Jacobian’, u is in ’the centralizer
of v with respect to the Jacobian’, and u, v ’commute with respect to the Jacobian’.
From CMW’s theorem over k, Theorem 2.3 or Proposition 2.6, it is immediate
to obtain the following:
Theorem 3.1. Suppose Jac(A, B) ∈ D[x, y]∗ = D∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for
A, B, w ∈ D[x, y]. Then w ∈ Q(D)[A].
Proof. A, B ∈ D[x, y] ⊂ Q(D)[x, y] satisfy Jac(A, B) ∈ D∗ ⊂ Q(D)∗ and w ∈
D[x, y] ⊂ Q(D)[x, y] satisfies Jac(A, w) = 0. We can apply Theorem 2.3 or Proposition 2.6 (Q(D) is a field of characteristic zero) and obtain that w ∈ Q(D)[A].
Theorem 3.1 shows that there exists d(w) ∈ D such that d(w)w ∈ D[A]; indeed,
P λi i
0 6= µi , λi ∈ D. Then,
since w ∈ Q(D)[A] we can write w =
µi A , for some
Q
P
Q
λj
µi
1
i
∗
∈ D. Therefore, dw =
di A , where d =
µi ∈ D and dj = µj
w = d
P
P
P
d( d1
di Ai ∈ D[A]. This does not tell much, since each
di Ai ) = d d1 ( di Ai ) =
w has its own d = d(w), so in order to obtain the centralizer of A with respect
1
’s to D. In
to the Jacobian, we will need to add (apriori) infinitely many d(w)
1
other words, we can say that the centralizer of A is D[{ d(w) }w ][A] ⊆ Q(D)[A]. We
1
conjecture that the centralizer of A is the smallest possible (= every d(w)
belongs
to D), namely D[A].
Conjecture 3.2 (The two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over D). Suppose
Jac(A, B) ∈ D[x, y]∗ = D∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈ D[x, y]. Then w ∈
D[A].
Examples 3.3 (Non-counterexamples). First non-counterexample: The following is not a counterexample to the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over
Z: A = 2 + 3y, w = 1 + y; clearly w is in the centralizer of A w.r.t. the Jacobian,
and w = 1 + y = 13 + 13 (2 + 3y) = 13 + 31 A ∈ Q[A] − Z[A]. However, A does not have
a Jacobian mate in Z[x, y], since if B ∈ Z[x, y] was a Jacobian mate of A, then, by
definition, −3Bx = Jac(A, B) ∈ Z[x, y]∗ = Z∗ = {1, −1} (Bx denotes the derivative
of B w.r.t. x), so Bx = ± 31 ∈
/ Z[x, y], which is impossible (since B ∈ Z[x, y] implies
that Bx ∈ Z[x, y]).
Second non-counterexample: The following is not a counterexample to the
two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over D := k[a2 , ab, b2 , a3 , b3 ], where a and
THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL CENTRALIZER CONJECTURE
5
b are transcendental over k; it is due to YCor [17]: A = (ax+ by)2 = a2 x2 + 2abxy +
b2 y 2 ∈ D[x, y], w = (ax + by)3 = a3 x3 + 3a2 bx2 y + 3ab2 xy 2 + b3 y 3 ; clearly w is in
the centralizer of A w.r.t. the Jacobian. From considerations of degrees, w ∈
/ D[A]
and also from considerations of degrees, w ∈
/ Q(D)[A] (the degree of w is 3, while
the degree of a polynomial in A is even). However, A does not have a Jacobian
mate in D[x, y]; this can be seen in two ways:
• Otherwise, by Theorem 3.1, w ∈ Q(D)[A], but w ∈
/ Q(D)[A].
• Otherwise, if B ∈ D[x, y] was a Jacobian mate of A, then, by definition, Jac(A, B) ∈ D[x, y]∗ = D∗ = k ∗ A direct computation shows that
1
2
2
2 Jac(A, B) = (a x + aby)By − (b y + abx)Bx , hence Jac(A, B)|(x = 0, y =
0) = 0, which contradicts Jac(A, B) ∈ k ∗ .
The two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture has a positive answer (at least) in
the following two special cases:
• First special case: D is, in addition, a field; this is CMW’s theorem over k,
Theorem 2.3 or Proposition 2.6.
• Second special case: (x, y) 7→ (A, B) is, in addition, an automorphism (A, B
is an automorphism pair); this is the content of the following Theorem 3.4.
Theorem 3.4 (Special case: Automorphism pair). Suppose Jac(A, B) ∈ D[x, y]∗ =
D∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈ D[x, y]. Further assume that (x, y) 7→ (A, B)
is an automorphism of D[x, y]. Then w ∈ D[A].
Proof. Denote g : (x, y) 7→ (A, B). By assumption, g is an automorphism of D[x, y],
so g −1 : D[x, y] → D[x, y] exists and is also an automorphism of D[x, y].
First step A = x: If A = x, then it is easy to see that w ∈ D[A] = D[x].
Indeed, wy = Jac(x, w) = Jac(A, w) = 0, where wy is the derivative of w with
respect to y. Write w in its (0, 1)-degree form: w = w0 + w1 y + w2 y 2 + · · · + wm y m ,
where w0 , w1 , w2 , . . . , wm ∈ D[x]. We have just seen that wy = 0, hence, 0 = wy =
w1 + 2w2 y + · · · + mwm y m−1 , which implies that w1 = 2w2 = . . . = mwm = 0,
so w1 = w2 = . . . = wm = 0 (since the characteristic of D is zero). Therefore,
w = w0 ∈ D[x] = D[A], and we are done.
Second step A arbitrary: The general case can be obtained from the special
case A = x.
Claim: u := g −1 (w) is in the centralizer of x. Proof of Claim: Jac(x, u) =
Jac(g −1 (A), g −1 (w)) = 0, since Jac(A, w) = 0 (it is clear that if A and w are
algebraically dependent over D, then g −1 (A) and g −1 (w) are also algebraically
dependent over D). Apply the first step and get that g −1 (w) = u ∈ D[x]. Hence
we can write g −1 (w) = d0 + d1 x + d2 x2 + · · · + dl xl , for some d0 , d1 , d2 , . . . , dl ∈ D.
Then, w = g(d0 +d1 x+d2 x2 +· · ·+dl xl ) = g(d0 )+g(d1 x)+g(d2 x2 )+· · ·+g(dl xl ) =
g(d0 ) + g(d1 )g(x) + g(d2 )g(x2 ) + · · · + g(dl )g(xl ) = d0 + d1 A + d2 A2 + · · · + dl Al ∈
D[A].
It is not surprising that we have not succeeded to find a counterexample to the
two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture, since when we picked an A ∈ D[x, y] which
has a Jacobian mate B ∈ D[x, y], those A and B always defined an automorphism
of D[x, y], and for an automorphism of D[x, y] (= A is part of an automorphism
pair) the conjecture holds by Theorem 3.4.
Given a commutative ring R, denote:
• JC(2, R): The two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over R is true, namely,
every R-algebra endomorphism of R[x, y] having an invertible Jacobian (the
Jacobian is in R[x, y]∗ = R∗ ) is an automorphism of R[x, y].
6
VERED MOSKOWICZ
• CC(2, R): The two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over R is true,
namely, if Jac(A, B) ∈ R[x, y]∗ = R∗ and Jac(A, w) = 0 for A, B, w ∈
R[x, y], then w ∈ R[A].
We have,
Theorem 3.5 (JC(2, D) implies CC(2, D)). If the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over D is true, then the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over D is
true.
We do not know if the converse of Theorem 3.5 is true, namely, if a positive
answer to the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over D implies a positive
answer to the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over D.
Proof. Assume that A ∈ D[x, y] has a Jacobian mate B in D[x, y], and w ∈ D[x, y]
satisfies Jac(A, w) = 0. We must show that w ∈ D[A]. By assumption, the twodimensional Jacobian Conjecture over D is true, so (x, y) 7→ (A, B) is an automorphism of D[x, y]. Apply Theorem 3.4 and get that w ∈ D[A].
Recall [9, Lemma 1.1.14] which says that JC(2, C) implies JC(2, D), therefore:
Theorem 3.6. If the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over C is true, then
the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over D is true.
Proof. JC(2, C) ⇒ JC(2, D) ⇒ CC(2, D), where the first implication is due to [9,
Lemma 1.1.14], while the second implication is due to Theorem 3.5.
Of course, Theorem 3.5 implies that if there exists an integral domain D of
characteristic zero such that the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over D
is false, then the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over D is false, and then,
by [9, Lemma 1.1.14], the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over C is false.
We suspect that the two-dimensional Centralizer Conjecture over any integral
domain of characteristic zero is true, because we ’believe’ that the two-dimensional
Jacobian Conjecture is true.
Finally, we wish to quote A. van den Essen [10, page 2]: “... All these experiences
fed my believe that the Jacobian Conjecture, if true at all, would be difficult to
generalize, since it felt like a kind of optimal statement”.
4
Non-commutative analog: The first Weyl algebra
By definition, the n’th Weyl algebra An (k) is the unital associative k-algebra generated by 2n elements X1 , . . . , Xn , Y1 , . . . , Yn subject to the following defining relations: [Yi , Xj ] = δij , [Xi , Xj ] = 0 and [Yi , Yj ] = 0, where δij is the Kronecker delta.
When n = 1, we will denote the generators by X, Y instead of by X1 , Y1 .
The first Weyl algebra, A1 (k), was first studied by Dirac [7]. In [8], Dixmier
posed six questions concerning A1 (k), k is a field of characteristic zero. The first
question asked if every k-algebra endomorphism of A1 (k) is an automorphism of
A1 (k); this is known as Dixmier Conjecture.
Given a commutative ring R, denote:
• JC(n, R): The n-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over R is true, namely,
every R-algebra endomorphism of R[x1 , . . . , xn ] having an invertible Jacobian (the Jacobian is in R[x1 , . . . , xn ]∗ = R∗ ) is an automorphism of
R[x1 , . . . , xn ].
• DC(n, R): The n’th Dixmier Conjecture over R is true, namely, every Ralgebra endomorphism of An (R) is an automorphism of An (R).
• JC(∞, R): For all n ∈ N, the n-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over R is
true.
THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL CENTRALIZER CONJECTURE
7
• DC(∞, R): For all n ∈ N, the n’th Dixmier Conjecture over R is true.
There is a well-known connection between the Jacobian Conjecture and the
Dixmier Conjecture, which says the following: For all n ∈ N:
(i) DC(n, k) ⇒ JC(n, k).
(ii) JC(2n, k) ⇒ DC(n, k).
The first result can be found in [9, Theorem 4.2.8] and in [3, page 297] (immediately
after Proposition 2.3). The second result was proved independently by Y. Tsuchimoto [21] and by A. Belov-Kanel and M. Kontsevich [5]. There exist additional
proofs due to V. V. Bavula [4], and due to K. Adjamagbo and A. van den Essen [1].
From (i) and (ii) it is clear that JC(∞, k) is equivalent to DC(∞, k).
In the non-commutative algebra A1 (k), denote the centralizer of an element P
by Cent(P ) (= all the elements in A1 (k) which commute with P ).
An analog result in A1 (k) to CMW’s result in k[x, y] exists, and is due to J. A.
Guccione, J. J. Guccione and C. Valqui, namely:
Theorem 4.1 (Analog of CMW’s theorem over k). If P, Q ∈ A1 (k) satisfy [Q, P ] ∈
A1 (k)∗ = k ∗ , then Cent(P ) = k[P ].
Proof. See [11, Theorem 2.11].
Notice that the non-commutative case [11, Theorem 2.11] is already over k, while
the commutative case [6, Theorem 1] is over C and we showed in Theorem 2.3 and
in Proposition 2.6 that C can be replaced by k.
Remark 4.2. It seems that none of the proofs of Theorem 2.3 and Proposition 2.6
has a non-commutative version:
• The proof of Theorem 2.3 is based on Formanek’s observation, Proposition
2.1, and on Jacobi’s theorem, Theorem 2.2 (2), which together say the following: Assume that C, D ∈ k[x, y] satisfy Jac(C, D) = 0. Then there exist
h ∈ k[x, y] and u(t), v(t) ∈ k[t], such that C = u(h) and D = v(h). However, there exists a known counterexample due to Dixmier [8] to this result
in the non-commutative case, namely, there exist C, D ∈ A1 (k) satisfying
[C, D] = 0, but there exist no h ∈ A1 (k) and u(t), v(t) ∈ k[t], such that
C = u(h) and D = v(h). For more details on the counterexample, see [15]
and [18].
• The proof of Proposition 2.6 is based on the original CMW’s theorem; the
proof of the original CMW’s theorem uses results concerning C[x, y] (such
as extension of derivations), and we do not know if those results have noncommutative analogs.
CMW’s theorem over k implies Theorem 3.1, and similarly, the analog of CMW’s
theorem over k, Theorem 4.1, implies the following analog of Theorem 3.1:
Theorem 4.3. Suppose [A, B] ∈ A1 (D)∗ = D∗ and [A, w] = 0 for A, B, w ∈
A1 (D). Then w ∈ Q(D)[A].
Proof. A, B ∈ A1 (D) ⊂ A1 (Q(D)) satisfy [A, B] ∈ D∗ ⊂ Q(D)∗ and w ∈ A1 (D) ⊂
A1 (Q(D)) satisfies [A, w] = 0. We can apply Theorem 4.1 (Q(D) is a field of
characteristic zero) and obtain that w ∈ Q(D)[A].
We conjecture the non-commutative analog of Conjecture 3.2:
Conjecture 4.4 (The (first) Centralizer Conjecture over D). Suppose [A, B] ∈
A1 (D)∗ = D∗ and [A, w] = 0 for A, B, w ∈ A1 (D). Then w ∈ D[A].
The following useful equation will be applied in Examples 4.6 and in the proof
of Theorem 4.7.
8
VERED MOSKOWICZ
Lemma 4.5 (Useful
equation). For all t(Y ) ∈ k[Y ] and i ∈ N: [t(Y ), X i ] =
i
iX i−1 t′ (Y ) + 2 X i−2 t′′ (Y ) + . . . .
In particular, this equation is valid for t(Y ) ∈ D[Y ] (since t(Y ) ∈ D[Y ] ⊂
Q(D)[Y ]).
Proof. See [12, Proposition 1.6].
The analog of Examples 3.3 is:
Examples 4.6 (Non-counterexamples). First non-counterexample: The following is not a counterexample to the (first) Centralizer Conjecture over Z: A =
2 + 3Y , w = 1 + Y ; clearly w ∈ Cent(A), and w = 1 + Y = 31 + 31 (2 + 3Y ) =
1
1
3 + 3 A ∈ Q[A] − Z[A]. However, A does not have a Dixmier mate in A1 (Z), since
if B ∈ A1 (Z) was a Dixmier mate of A, then by the definition of a Dixmier mate,
[A, B] ∈ A1 (Z)∗ = Z∗ = {1,
this is impossible from the following direct
P −1}. But
j
computation:PWrite B = bij X i Y P
, bij ∈ Z. Then,
P
i j
i j
[B, A] = [ bij XP
Y , 2 + 3Y ] =
bij [XP
Y , 2 + 3Y ] =
bijP
(X i [Y j , 2 + 3Y ] +
i
i
j
i
j
i
[XP
, 2 + 3Y ]Y j ) =
bij
[X
,
2
+
3Y
]Y
=
3b
[X
,
Y
]Y
=
−
]Y j =
ij
P
P3bij [Y, X
i−1 j
i−1 j
i−1 j
− 3bij iX Y = − 3ibij X Y . If [A, B] ∈ {1, −1}, then
3ibij X Y ∈
{1, −1}. Therefore, 3b10 ∈ {1, −1}, so b10 ∈ { 31 , − 31 }, a contradiction to b10 ∈ Z.
Second non-counterexample: The following is not a counterexample to the
(first) Centralizer Conjecture over D := k[a2 , ab, b2 , a3 , b3 ], where a and b are transcendental over k: A = (aX + bY )2 , w = (aX + bY )3 . w ∈ Cent(A) (clear),
w ∈
/ Q(D)[A] (considerations of degrees), A does not have a Dixmier mate in
A1 (D) (direct computation).
The (first) Centralizer Conjecture has a positive answer (at least) in the following
two special cases:
• First special case: D is, in addition, a field; this is the analog of CMW’s
theorem over k, Theorem 4.1.
• Second special case: (X, Y ) 7→ (A, B) is, in addition, an automorphism
(A, B is an automorphism pair); this is the content of the following Theorem
4.7.
Theorem 4.7 (Special case: Automorphism pair). Suppose [A, B] ∈ A1 (D)∗ = D∗
and [A, w] = 0 for A, B, w ∈ A1 (D). Further assume that (X, Y ) 7→ (A, λB),
λ = [A, B]−1 , is an automorphism of A1 (D). Then w ∈ D[A].
Proof. Denote g : (X, Y ) 7→ (A, λB). By assumption, g is an automorphism of
A1 (D), so g −1P
: A1 (D) → A1 (D) exists and is also an automorphism of A1 (D).
Write w = wij X i Y j , wij ∈ D, 0 ≤ i ≤ m, 0 ≤ j ≤ l.
FirstPstep A = X: If P
A = X, then it isPeasy to see that w
P∈ D[A] = D[X].
i
Indeed,
jwijP
X i Y j−1 = wij XP
jY j−1 = wij X i [Y j , X] = wij (X i [Y j , X] +
[X i , X]Y j ) = wij [X i Y j , X] = [ wij X i Y j , X] = [w, X] = [w, A] = 0.
Therefore, jwij = 0, 0 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ jP≤ l. Since D is P
of characteristic zero,
m
m
wij = 0, 0 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ j ≤ l. Then, w = i=0 wi0 X i Y 0 = i=0 wi0 X i ∈ D[X].
Second step A arbitrary: The general case can be obtained from the special
case A = X.
Claim: u := g −1 (w) is in the centralizer of X.
Proof of Claim: [X, u] = [g −1 (A), g −1 (w)] = g −1 (A)g −1 (w) − g −1 (w)g −1 (A)
= g −1 (Aw) − g −1 (wA) = g −1 (Aw − wA) = g −1 ([A, w]) = g −1 (0) = 0. Apply
the first step and get that g −1 (w) = u ∈ D[X]. Hence we can write g −1 (w) =
d0 + d1 X + d2 X 2 + · · · + dl X l , for some d0 , d1 , d2 , . . . , dl ∈ D. Then, w = g(d0 +
d1 X + d2 X 2 + · · · + dl X l ) = g(d0 ) + g(d1 X) + g(d2 X 2 ) + · · · + g(dl X l ) = g(d0 ) +
g(d1 )g(X)+g(d2 )g(X 2 )+· · ·+g(dl )g(X l ) = d0 +d1 A+d2 A2 +· · ·+dl Al ∈ D[A].
THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL CENTRALIZER CONJECTURE
9
We have an analog to Theorem 3.5:
Theorem 4.8. If the first Dixmier Conjecture over D is true, then the (first)
Centralizer Conjecture over D is true.
We do not know if the converse of Theorem 4.8 is true, namely, if a positive
answer to the (first) Centralizer Conjecture over D implies a positive answer to the
first Dixmier Conjecture over D.
Proof. Assume that A ∈ A1 (D) has a Dixmier mate B in A1 (D), and w ∈ A1 (D)
satisfies [A, w] = 0. We must show that w ∈ D[A]. By assumption, the first Dixmier
Conjecture over D is true, so (X, Y ) 7→ (A, λB), λ = [A, B]−1 , is an automorphism
of A1 (D). Apply Theorem 4.7 and get that w ∈ D[A].
We do not know if an analog of [9, Lemma 1.1.14] exists, hence we do not know
how to obtain an analog of Theorem 3.6.
Of course, Theorem 4.8 implies that if there exists an integral domain D of
characteristic zero such that the first Centralizer Conjecture over D is false, then
the first Dixmier Conjecture over D is false, namely, there exists A, B ∈ A1 (D),
[B, A] = 1 and (X, Y ) 7→ (A, B) is not an automorphism of A1 (D). We have
recalled above in (ii) that JC(2n, k) ⇒ DC(n, k). If this implication is also valid if
we replace k by D, namely, JC(2n, D) ⇒ DC(n, D), then, in particular, JC(2, D)
⇒ DC(1, D). Therefore, if the first Dixmier Conjecture over D is false, then the
two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over D is false, and then by [9, Lemma 1.1.14],
the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture over C is false.
References
[1] K. Adjamagbo, A. van den Essen, On the equivalence of the Jacobian, Dixmier and Poisson
Conjectures in any characteristic, arXiv:math/0608009v1 [math.AG] 1 Aug 2006.
[2] H. Bass, Differential structure of étale extensions of polynomial algebras, in Commutative
Algebra, M. Hochster, C. Huncke and J. D. Sally (ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989,
Proceedings of a Microprogram Held, June 15-July 2, 1987.
[3] H. Bass, E. Connell and D. Wright, The Jacobian Conjecture: reduction of degree and formal
expansion of the inverse, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (New Series) 7, 287-330, 1982.
[4] V. V. Bavula,
The Jacobian conjecture-2n implies the Dixmier problem-n,
arXiv:math/0512250v1 [math.RA] 12 Dec 2005.
[5] A. Belov-Kanel, M. Kontsevich, The Jacobian conjecture is stably equivalent to the Dixmier
conjecture, Mosc. Math. J. 7, no. 2, 349, 209-218, 2007.
[6] C. C.-A. Cheng, J. H. Mckay and S. S.-S. Wang, Younger mates and the Jacobian conjecture,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 123, no. 10, 2939-2947, 1995.
[7] P. A. M. Dirac, On quantum algebra, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 23, 412-418, 1926.
[8] J. Dixmier, Sur les algebres de Weyl, Bull. Soc. Math. France, vol. 96, 209-242, 1968.
[9] A. van den Essen, Polynomial automorphisms and the Jacobian Conjecture, Progress in
Mathematics, 190. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2000.
[10] A. van den Essen, The amazing Image Conjecture, arXiv:1006.5801v1 [math.AG] 30 Jun
2010.
[11] J. A. Guccione, J. J. Guccione and C. Valqui, On the centralizers in the Weyl algebra, Proc.
Amer. Math. Soc. 140, no. 4, 1233-1241, 2012.
[12] J.A. Guccione, J.J. Guccione, and C. Valqui, The Dixmier conjecture and the shape of possible
counterexamples, J. of Algebra 399, 581-633, 2014.
[13] O. H. Keller, Ganze Cremona-Transformationen, Monatsh. Math. Phys. 47, 299-306, 1939.
[14] L. Makar-Limanov, Locally nilpotent derivatives, a new ring invariant and applications,
http://www.math.wayne.edu/ lml/lmlnotes.pdf, 1995.
[15] L. Makar-Limanov, Centralizers in the quantum plane algebra, Studies in Lie Theory, Progress
in Mathematics 243, 411-416, 2006.
[16] MathOverflow, Any two bivariate algebraically dependent polynomials are always in the same
ring generated by some bivariate polynomial?, https://mathoverflow.net/questions/190920/
[17] MathOverflow, If f, g ∈ D[x, y] are algebraically dependent over D, then f, g ∈ D[h] for some
h ∈ D[x, y]?, https://mathoverflow.net/questions/287610/
10
VERED MOSKOWICZ
[18] MathStackExchange, Commuting elements in Weyl algebras of characteristic zero,
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/210438/
[19] N. Saxena, Algebraic independence and applications, Hausdorff Center for Mathematics,
Bonn. (Joint work with Malte Beecken and Johannes Mittmann, HCM, Bonn).
[20] A. Schinzel, Selected topics on polynomials, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1982.
[21] Y. Tsuchimoto, Endomorphisms of Weyl algebra and p-curvature, Osaka J. Math. 42, no. 2,
435-452, 2005.
[22] S. S.-S. Wang, Extension of derivations, J. of Algebra 69, 240-246, 1981.
Department of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel.
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
An Optimal Choice Dictionary
Torben Hagerup
arXiv:1711.00808v1 [cs.DS] 2 Nov 2017
Institut für Informatik, Universität Augsburg, 86135 Augsburg, Germany
[email protected]
Abstract. A choice dictionary is a data structure that can be initialized with a parameter
n ∈ N = {1, 2, . . .} and subsequently maintains an initially empty subset S of {1, . . . , n}
under insertion, deletion, membership queries and an operation choice that returns an
arbitrary element of S. The choice dictionary is fundamental in space-efficient computing
and has numerous applications. The best previous choice dictionary can be initialized with
n and a second parameter t ∈ N in constant time and subsequently executes all operations
in O(t) time and occupies n + O(n(t/w)t + log n) bits on a word RAM with a word length
of w = Ω(log n) bits. We describe a new choice dictionary that, following a constant-time
initialization, executes all operations in constant time and, in addition to the space needed
to store n, occupies only n + 1 bits, which is shown to be optimal if w = o(n). Allowed
⌈log2 (n + 1)⌉ bits of additional space, the new data structure also supports iteration over
the set S in constant time per element.
Keywords. Data structures, space efficiency, choice dictionaries, bounded universes.
1
Introduction
Following similar earlier definitions [3,5] and concurrently with that of [2], the choice-dictionary
data type was introduced by Hagerup and Kammer [8] as a basic tool in space-efficient computing
and is known to have numerous applications [2,5,8,10,11]. Its precise characterization is as follows:
Definition 1.1. A choice dictionary is a data type that can be initialized with an arbitrary
integer n ∈ N = {1, 2, . . .}, subsequently maintains an initially empty subset S of U = {1, . . . , n}
and supports the following operations, whose preconditions are stated in parentheses:
insert (ℓ)
delete(ℓ)
contains(ℓ)
choice:
(ℓ ∈ U ):
(ℓ ∈ U ):
(ℓ ∈ U ):
Replaces S by S ∪ {ℓ}.
Replaces S by S \ {ℓ}.
Returns 1 if ℓ ∈ S, 0 otherwise.
Returns an (arbitrary) element of S if S 6= ∅, 0 otherwise.
As is common and convenient, we use the term “choice dictionary” also to denote data
structures that implement the choice-dictionary data type. Following the initialization of a choice
dictionary D with an integer n, we call (the constant) n the universe size of D and (the variable)
S its client set. If a choice dictionary D can operate only if given access to n (stored outside
of D), we say that D is externally sized. Otherwise, for emphasis, we may call D self-contained.
Our model of computation is a word RAM [1,7] with a word length of w ∈ N bits, where
we assume that w is large enough to allow all memory words in use to be addressed. As part
of ensuring this, in the discussion of a choice dictionary with universe size n we always assume
that w > log2 n. The word RAM has constant-time operations for addition, subtraction and
multiplication modulo 2w , division with truncation ((x, y) 7→ ⌊x/y⌋ for y > 0), left shift modulo
2w ((x, y) 7→ (x ≪ y) mod 2w , where x ≪ y = x · 2y ), right shift ((x, y) 7→ x ≫ y = ⌊x/2y ⌋), and
bitwise Boolean operations (and, or and xor (exclusive
or)). We also assume a constant-time
√
operation to load an integer that deviates from w by at most a constant factor—this enables
the proof of Lemma 2.1.
The best previous choice dictionary [8, Theorem 7.6] can be initialized with a universe size
n and a second parameter t ∈ N in constant time and subsequently executes all operations in
O(t) time and occupies n + O(n(t/w)t + log n) bits. Let us call a choice dictionary atomic if
it executes all operations including the initialization in constant time. Then, for every constant
1
t ∈ N, the result just cited implies the existence of an atomic choice dictionary that occupies
n + O(n/wt + log n) bits when initialized for universe size n. Here we describe an externally sized
atomic choice dictionary that needs just n + 1 bits, which is optimal if w = o(n). The optimality
of the bound of n + 1 bits follows from a simple argument of [9,12]: Because the client set S
of a choice dictionary with universe size n can be in 2n different states, any two of which can
be distinguished via calls of contains, if the choice dictionary uses only n bits it must represent
each possible state of S through a unique bit pattern. Since S is in one particular state following
the initialization, the latter must force each of n bits to a specific value, which needs Ω(n/w)
time.
In addition to being more space-efficient than all earlier choice dictionaries, the new data
structure is also significantly simpler than its best predecessors, and in an actual implementation
its operations are likely to be faster by a constant factor. The new choice dictionary owes much
to a recent data structure of Katoh and Goto [12] that implements so-called initializable arrays.
A connection between choice dictionaries and initializable arrays was first noted by Hagerup and
Kammer [9], who observed that the light-path technique, invented in [8] in the context of choice
dictionaries, also yields initializable arrays better than those known at the time. Here we show
that an ingenious and elegant data representation devised by Katoh and Goto, slightly modified
and used together with additional operations, yields a choice dictionary that leaves little to
be desired. Our main result, formulated in Theorem 1.2 below, can be expressed informally as
follows: At the price of one additional bit, a bit vector can be augmented with the operations
“clear all” and “locate a 1”.
Theorem 1.2. There is an externally sized atomic choice dictionary that, when initialized for
universe size n, occupies n + 1 bits in each quiescent state (i.e., between operations) and needs
O(w) additional bits of transient space during the execution of each operation.
2
A Simple Reduction
For n ∈ N, the bit-vector representation over U = {1, . . . , n} of a subset S of U is the sequence
(d1 , . . . , dn ) of n bits with dℓ = 1 ⇔ ℓ ∈ S, for ℓ = 1, . . . , n, or its obvious layout in n consecutive
bits in memory. If we represent the client set of a choice dictionary with universe size n via its bitvector representation B, the choice-dictionary operations translate into the reading and writing
of individual bits in B and the operation choice, which now returns the position of a nonzero
bit in B (0 if all bits in B are 0). It is trivial to carry out all operations other than initialization
and choice in constant time. In the special case n = O(w), the latter operations can also be
supported in constant time. This is a consequence of the following lemma.
Pw−1
Lemma 2.1 ([6,8]). Given a nonzero integer j=0 2j dj , where dj ∈ {0, 1} for j = 0, . . . , w − 1,
constant time suffices to compute max J and min J, where J = {j ∈ {0, . . . , w − 1} | dj = 1}.
We use the externally sized atomic choice dictionary for universe sizes of O(w) implied by
these considerations to handle the few bits left over when we divide a bit-vector representation
of n bits into pieces of a fixed size. The details are as follows:
Let b be a positive integer that can be computed from w and n in constant time using O(w)
bits (and therefore need not be stored) and that satisfies b ≥ log2 n, but b = O(w). In order to
realize an externally sized choice dictionary D with universe size n and client set S, partition
the bit-vector representation B of S into N = ⌊n/(2b)⌋ segments B1 , . . . , BN of exactly 2b bits
each, with n′ = n mod (2b) bits left over. If n′ 6= 0, maintain (the set corresponding to) the
last n′ bits of B in an externally sized atomic choice dictionary D2 realized as discussed above.
Assume without loss of generality that N ≥ 1. The following lemma is proved in the remainder
of the paper:
Lemma 2.2. There is a data structure that, if given access to b and N , can be initialized in
constant time and subsequently occupies 2bN + 1 bits and maintains a sequence (a1 , . . . , aN ) ∈
{0, . . . , 22b − 1}N , initially (0, . . . , 0), under the following operations, all of which execute in
2
constant time: read (i) (i ∈ {1, . . . , N }), which returns ai ; write(i, x) (i ∈ {1, . . . , N } and x ∈
{0, . . . , 22b − 1}), which sets ai to x; and nonzero, which returns an i ∈ {1, . . . , N } with ai 6= 0
if there is such an i, and 0 otherwise.
For i = 1, . . . , N , view Bi as the binary representation of an integer and maintain that integer
as ai in an instance of the data structure of Lemma 2.2. This yields an externally sized atomic
choice dictionary D1 for the first 2bN bits of B: To carry out insert , delete or contains, update
or inspect the relevant bit in one of a1 , . . . , aN , and to execute choice, call nonzero and, if the
return value i is positive, apply an algorithm of Lemma 2.1 to ai . It is obvious how to realize the
full choice dictionary D through a combination of D1 and D2 . The only nontrivial case is that
of the operation choice. To execute choice in D, first call choice in D1 (say). If the return value
is positive, it is a suitable return value for the parent call. Otherwise call choice in D2 , increase
the return value by 2bN if it is positive, and return the resulting number. D is atomic because
D1 and D2 are, and the total number of bits used by D is 2bN + 1 + n′ = n + 1. Theorem 1.2
follows.
3
The Main Construction
In this section we prove Lemma 2.2, except that we relax the space bound by allowing 2bN + w
bits instead of 2bN + 1 bits.
3.1
The Storage Scheme
This subsection describes how the sequence (a1 , . . . , aN ) is represented in memory in 2bN + w
bits. Most of the available memory stores an array A of N cells A[1], . . . , A[N ] of 2b bits each. In
addition, a w-bit word is used to hold an integer k ∈ {0, . . . , N } best thought of as a “barrier”
that divides V = {1, . . . , N } into a part to the left of the barrier, {1, . . . , k}, and a part to its
right, {k + 1, . . . , N }. We often consider a (2b)-bit quantity x to consist of a lower half, denoted
by x and composed of the b least significant bits of x (i.e., x = x and (2b − 1)) and an upper half,
x = x ≫ b, and we may write x = (x, x). A central idea is that the upper halves of A[1], . . . , A[N ]
are used to implement a matching on V according to the following convention: Elements i and
j of V are matched exactly if A[i] = j, A[j] = i, and precisely one of i and j lies to the left of
the barrier, i.e., i ≤ k < j or j ≤ k < i. In this case we call j the mate of i and vice versa. The
assumption b ≥ log2 n ensures that the upper half of each cell in A can hold an arbitrary element
of V . A function that inputs an element i of V and returns the mate of i if i is matched and i
itself if not is easily coded as follows:
mate(i):
i′ := A[i];
if (1 ≤ i ≤ k < i′ ≤ N or 1 ≤ i′ ≤ k < i ≤ N ) and A[i′ ] = i then return i′ ;
return i;
For all i ∈ V , call i strong if i is matched and i ≤ k or i is unmatched and i > k, and call i
weak if it is not strong. The integers A[1], . . . , A[N ] and k represent the sequence (a1 , . . . , aN )
according to the following storage invariant: For all i ∈ V ,
– ai = 0 exactly if i is weak;
– if i is strong and i > k, then ai = A[i];
– if i is strong and i ≤ k, then ai = (A[i], A[mate(i)]).
The storage invariant is illustrated in Fig. 1. The following drawing conventions are used here
and in subsequent figures: The barrier is shown as a thick vertical line segment with a triangular
base. Each pair of mates is connected with a double arrow, and a cell A[i] of A is shown in a
darker hue if i is strong. A question mark indicates an entry that can be completely arbitrary,
except that it may not give rise to a matching edge, and the upper and lower halves of some
cells of A are shown separated by a dashed line segment.
3
Fig. 1. The storage scheme. Above: The array A. Below: The sequence a represented by A.
3.2
The Easy Operations
The data structure is initialized by setting k = N , i.e., by placing the barrier at the right end.
Then the matching is empty, and all elements of V are to the left of the barrier and weak. Thus
the initial value of (a1 , . . . , aN ) is (0, . . . , 0), as required. The implementation of read closely
reflects the storage invariant:
read (i):
if mate(i) ≤ k then return 0; (∗ i is weak exactly if mate(i) ≤ k ∗)
if i > k then return A[i]; else return (A[i], A[mate(i)]);
The code for nonzero is short but a little tricky:
nonzero:
if k = N then return 0;
return mate(N );
The implementation of write(i, x) is easy if i is weak and x = 0 (then nothing needs to be
done) or i is strong and x 6= 0. In the latter case the procedure simple write shown below can be
used. The only point worth noting is that writing to A[i] when i is strong and i > k may create
a spurious matching edge that must be eliminated.
simple write(i, x):
if i ≤ k then (A[i], A[mate(i)]) := (x, x);
else
A[i] := x;
i′ := mate(i);
if i′ 6= i then A[i′ ] := i′ ; (∗ eliminate a spurious matching edge ∗)
3.3
Insertion and Deletion
The remaining, more complicated, operations of the form write(i, x) are those in which ai is
changed from zero to a nonzero value—call such an operation an insertion—or vice versa—
a deletion. When the data structure under development is used to realize a choice dictionary,
insertions and deletions are triggered by (certain) insertions and deletions, respectively, executed
on the choice dictionary. Insertions and deletions are the operations that change the barrier and
usually the matching. In fact, k is decreased by 1 in every insertion and increased by 1 in every
deletion, so k is always the number of i ∈ V with ai = 0.
The various different forms that an insertion may take are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3. The
situation before the insertion is always shown above the situation after the insertion. A “1”
outside of the “stripes” indicates the position of an insertion and symbolizes the nonzero value
to be written, while a “1” inside the stripes symbolizes that value after it has been written. The
various forms of a deletion are illustrated in Figs. 4 and 5. Here a “0” indicates the position of
a deletion, while a “1” symbolizes the nonzero value that is to be replaced by zero.
There are many somewhat different cases, but for each it is easy to see that the storage
invariant is preserved and that the sequence (a1 , . . . , aN ) changes as required. It is also easy to
turn the figures into a write procedure that branches into as many cases. Here we propose the
following realization of write that is terser, but needs a more careful justification.
4
Fig. 2. Insertion to the left of the barrier.
Fig. 3. Insertion to the right of the barrier.
Fig. 4. Deletion to the left of the barrier.
Fig. 5. Deletion to the right of the barrier.
5
write(i, x):
x0 := read (i); (∗ the value to be replaced by x ∗)
i′ := mate(i);
if x 6= 0 then
if x0 = 0 then (∗ an insertion ∗)
k ′ := mate(k); (∗ e
k = k will cross the barrier ∗)
u := read (k); (∗ save aek ∗)
k := k − 1; (∗ move the barrier left ∗)
simple write(k + 1, u); (∗ reestablish the value of aek ∗)
if i 6= k ′ then { A[i′ ] := k ′ ; A[k ′ ] := i′ ; A[k ′ ] := A[i]; } (∗ match i′ and k ′ ∗)
simple write(i, x); (∗ i was or has been made strong ∗)
else (∗ x = 0 ∗)
if x0 6= 0 then (∗ a deletion ∗)
k ′ := mate(k + 1); (∗ e
k = k + 1 will cross the barrier ∗)
v := read (k ′ ); (∗ save ak′ ∗)
k := k + 1; (∗ move the barrier right ∗)
A[i′ ] := k ′ ; A[k ′ ] := i′ ; (∗ match i′ and k ′ ∗)
if k ′ 6= i then simple write(k ′ , v); (∗ reestablish the value of ak′ ∗)
To see the correctness of the procedure write shown above, consider a call write(i, x) and
assume that it gives rise to an insertion or a deletion, since in the remaining cases the procedure
is easily seen to perform correctly. Let k0 be the value of k (immediately) before the call. Because
the call changes the value of k by 1, a single element e
k of V crosses the barrier, i.e., is to the
left of the barrier before or after the call, but not both. In the case of an insertion, e
k = k0 ; in
that of a deletion, e
k = k0 + 1.
Assume that i does not cross the barrier, i.e., that i 6= e
k. Because the call changes ai from
zero to a nonzero value or vice versa, i must change its matching status, i.e., be matched before
or after the call, but not both. In detail, if i is matched before the call, its mate at that time, if
different from e
k, must find a new mate, which automatically leaves i unmatched. If i is unmatched
before the call, i itself must find a mate. We can unify the two cases by saying that if i′ = mate(i)
(evaluated before the call under consideration has changed k and A) is not e
k, then i′ must find
′
′
e
a (new) mate. If i 6= k, moreover, i is to the left of the barrier in the case of an insertion and
to the right of it in the case of a deletion.
Assume now that the call does not change aek , i.e., that e
k 6= i. Then, because e
k crosses the
barrier, it must also change its matching status: If e
k is matched before the call, its mate at that
time, if different from i, must find a new mate, and otherwise e
k itself must find a mate. As above,
this can be expressed by saying that if k ′ = mate(e
k) (evaluated before the call has changed k
and A) is not i, then k ′ must find a new mate. Moreover, after the call k ′ is to the right of the
barrier in the case of an insertion and to the left of it in the case of a deletion.
Exclude the special cases identified above by assuming that {i, i′ } ∩ {e
k, k ′ } = ∅. Then it can
be seen that all required changes to the matching can be effectuated by matching i′ and k ′ ,
which is what the procedure write does. In the case of an insertion, this makes i strong, which
implies that ai can be set to x simply by executing simple write(i, x) at the very end.
In addition, with ℓ = min{i′ , k ′ }, it must be ensured that the call does not change aℓ except
if ℓ = i. In the case of an insertion, ℓ = i′ , and if i′ 6= i, the mate of i′ switches from being i to
being k ′ , so that it suffices to execute A[k ′ ] := A[i], which happens in the procedure. The same
assignment is executed if i′ = i, in which case it is useless but harmless, given that it takes place
before the call simple write(i, x). In the case of a deletion, ℓ = k ′ . Here the procedure plays it
safe by remembering the value of ak′ before the call in a variable v and restoring ak′ to that
value at the end, unless k ′ = i, via the call simple write(k ′ , v). This is convenient because ak′ is
not stored in a unique way before the call.
At this point i, i′ and k ′ have been “taken care of”, but e
k still needs attention. In the case
k is weak, so nothing more needs to be done. In an insertion, the
of a deletion, either e
k = k ′ or e
procedure saves the original value of aek in u and restores it afterwards through the statement
6
simple write(k + 1, u). This is necessary and meaningful only if e
k is strong. If e
k is weak, however,
the effect of the statement—except for the harmless possible elimination of a spurious matching
edge—is canceled through the subsequent assignment to A[k ′ ] and A[k ′ ].
We still need to consider the special cases that were ignored above, namely calls with {i, i′ } ∩
{e
k, k ′ } 6= ∅. These form part (b) of Figs. 2–5. In fact, the number of special cases is quite limited.
If e
k is weak before an insertion or strong before a deletion, it is unmatched. Thus if i = e
k, we
have i = i′ = e
k = k ′ , and i′ = k ′ implies i = e
k. On the other hand, each of the statements i = k ′
and i′ = e
k implies the other one. Thus there are two cases to consider: (1) i = i′ = e
k = k ′ and
′
′
e
(2) i = k 6= k = i .
In case (1), all writing to A happens to A[i]. For insertion, the execution of simple write(i, x)
at the very end ensures the correctness of the call. For deletion, the execution of A[k ′ ] := i′ at
the end ensures that i is unmatched, which is all that is required. In case (2), after an insertion,
i and e
k are both to the right of the barrier, ai and aek are both nonzero, and the execution of
k] have the correct values
simple write(i, x) and simple write(k + 1, u) ensures that A[i] and A[e
after the call. After a deletion, i and e
k are both to the left of the barrier and ai = aek = 0, and
k are both unmatched,
the execution of A[i′ ] := k ′ and A[k ′ ] := i′ in fact ensures that i and e
which is all that is required.
Since all operations of the data structure have been formulated as pieces of code without
loops and b = O(w), it is clear that the operations execute in constant time.
4
4.1
The Last Bits and Pieces
Reducing the Space Requirements
The space requirements of the data structure of the previous section can be reduced from 2bN +w
bits to 2bN + 1 bits, as promised in Lemma 2.2, by a method of [9,12]. First, b is chosen to satisfy
not only b ≥ log2 n, but b ≥ 2 log2 n, which is clearly still compatible with b = O(w). As a result,
for each i ∈ V to the left of the barrier, A[i] has at least 2 log2 n − ⌈log2 N ⌉ ≥ ⌈log2 N ⌉ unused
bits. If k ≥ 1, we store k in the unused bits of A[1] (the unused bits of A[2], . . . , A[k] continue
to be unused). When k = 0, even A[1] is to the right of the barrier and there are no unused bits
in A, so we use a single bit outside of A to indicate whether k is nonzero. The resulting data
structure occupies exactly 2bN + 1 bits.
4.2
The Choice of b
A practical choice dictionary based on the ideas of this paper would probably content itself with
the main construction of Section 3 and refrain from applying the construction of Subsection 4.1
to squeeze out the last few bits. Then there is no reason to choose b larger than w, and b = w
seems the best choice. This yields a self-contained atomic choice dictionary that occupies n + 2w
bits when used with universe size n.
If w is even and w ≥ 2 log2 n, another plausible choice is b = w/2, which allows an entry in
the array A to be manipulated with a single instruction and simplifies the access to cells of A.
It seems likely, however, that the gains in certain scenarios from choosing b = w/2 instead of
b = w are small and can be reduced still further through an optimization of the case b = w that
omits superfluous operations on upper or lower halves of cells in A.
If the space needed for an externally sized choice dictionary is to be reduced all the way to
n + 1 bits for universe size n, b = 2w seems the best choice.
4.3
A Self-Contained Atomic Choice Dictionary
In order to convert the externally sized atomic choice dictionary of Theorem 1.2 to a selfcontained one, we must augment the data structure with an indication of the universe size n.
This can clearly always be done with w additional bits. If a space bound is desired that depends
7
only on n, n must be stored as a so-called self-delimiting numeric value. Assume first that the
most significant bits in a word are considered to be its “first” bits, i.e., the ones to be occupied
by a data structure of fewer than w bits (the “big-endian” convention). Then one possibility is
to use the code γ ′ of Elias [4]: With bin(n) denoting the usual binary representation of n ∈ N
(e.g., bin(10) = 1010), store n in the form of the string 0|bin(n)|−1 bin(n), which can be decoded
in constant time with an algorithm of Lemma 2.1. Since |bin(n)| = ⌈log2 (n + 1)⌉, this yields a
space bound for the self-contained choice dictionary of n+ 2⌈log2 (n+ 1)⌉ bits. If instead the least
significant bits of a word are considered to be its first bits (the “little-endian” convention), the
|bin(n)|−1
c
scheme needs to be changed slightly: The string 0|bin(n)|−1 bin(n) is replaced by bin(n)0
,
c
where bin(n) is the same as bin(n), except that the leading 1 is moved to the end.
Incidentally, if an application can guarantee that k never becomes zero, the method of Subsection 4.1 can be used to “hide” n as well as k in the array A if we choose b ≥ 4⌈log2 (n + 1)⌉.
This yields a restricted self-contained atomic choice dictionary that occupies n + 1 bits. The
restriction is satisfied, e.g., if the universe {1, . . . , n} always contains 4b − 1 consecutive elements
that do not belong to the client set.
4.4
Iteration
We say that a choice dictionary with client set S supports iteration in constant time per element
if there are constant-time operations to reset the iteration, to return (“enumerate”) some “next”
element of S, and to test whether the iteration is complete, i.e., whether all elements of S have
been enumerated. A more precise description can be found in [8].
Using Lemma 2.1, it is easy to enumerate the positions of the nonzero bits in a bit vector
of length O(w) in constant time per position output—two shifts can be used to clear the bits
whose positions were already enumerated. This reduces the problem of supporting constant-time
iteration for the choice dictionary of Theorem 1.2 to that of supporting constant-time iteration
over {i ∈ {1, . . . , N } | ai 6= 0} for the data structure of Lemma 2.2. And the latter is easy: For
i = k + 1, . . . , N , enumerate mate(i). The iteration needs to remember ⌈log2 (n + 1)⌉ bits of state
information between calls.
4.5
Additional Operations and Features
Compared to the best previous choice dictionary [8], the choice dictionary of the present paper,
while doing better on the “core business” of a choice dictionary, lacks many important additional
operations and features. If an application needs any of these additional capabilities, it must still
resort to the choice dictionary of [8].
First, the new choice dictionary supports iteration over the client set S, but it is not robust
in the sense of [8]: If S is modified during an iteration through insertions and deletions, the data
structure will not suffer a run-time error and will not enumerate elements outside of S, but an
element of S may be enumerated more than once, and it may not be enumerated at all even
though it belongs to S throughout the iteration.
Second, there is no obvious way to extend the new dictionary to several colors, i.e., to the
maintenance of several pairwise disjoint subsets of U = {1, . . . , n}, where n is the universe size,
or even to support the operation choice, which returns an element in the complement of the
client set with respect to U .
Operations that could be supported in constant time are batched insertion and deletion of all
elements of a subset I of U with max I − min I = O(w) presented via a bit-vector representation
in a constant number of words, as well as batched inspection, in the sense of contains, of O(w)
consecutive elements of U . However, this is a characteristic shared with earlier choice dictionaries.
References
1. D. Angluin and L. G. Valiant. Fast probabilistic algorithms for Hamiltonian circuits and matchings.
J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 18(2):155–193, 1979.
8
2. Niranka Banerjee, Sankardeep Chakraborty, and Venkatesh Raman. Improved space efficient algorithms for BFS, DFS and applications. In Proc. 22nd International Conference on Computing and
Combinatorics (COCOON 2016), volume 9797 of LNCS, pages 119–130. Springer, 2016.
3. Preston Briggs and Linda Torczon. An efficient representation for sparse sets. ACM Lett. Program.
Lang. Syst., 2(1-4):59–69, 1993.
4. Peter Elias. Universal codeword sets and representations of the integers. IEEE Trans. Inform.
Theory, 21(2):194–203, 1975.
5. Amr Elmasry, Torben Hagerup, and Frank Kammer. Space-efficient basic graph algorithms. In
Proc. 32nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2015),
volume 30 of LIPIcs, pages 288–301. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2015.
6. Michael L. Fredman and Dan E. Willard. Surpassing the information theoretic bound with fusion
trees. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 47(3):424–436, 1993.
7. Torben Hagerup. Sorting and searching on the word RAM. In Proc. 15th Annual Symposium on
Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 1998), volume 1373 of LNCS, pages 366–398.
Springer, 1998.
8. Torben Hagerup and Frank Kammer. Succinct choice dictionaries. Computing Research Repository
(CoRR), arXiv:1604.06058 [cs.DS], 2016.
9. Torben Hagerup and Frank Kammer. On-the-fly array initialization in less space. In Proc. 28th
International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2017), to appear, 2017.
10. Torben Hagerup, Frank Kammer, and Moritz Laudahn. Space-efficient Euler partition and bipartite
edge coloring. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC 2017),
volume 10236 of LNCS, pages 322–333. Springer, 2017.
11. Frank Kammer, Dieter Kratsch, and Moritz Laudahn. Space-efficient biconnected components and
recognition of outerplanar graphs. In Proc. 41st International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2016), volume 58 of LIPIcs, pages 56:1–56:14. Schloss Dagstuhl
– Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2016.
12. Takashi Katoh and Keisuke Goto. In-place initializable arrays. Computing Research Repository
(CoRR), arXiv:1709.08900 [cs.DS], 2017.
9
| 8cs.DS
|
A GEOMETER’S VIEW OF THE THE CRAMÉR-RAO BOUND
ON ESTIMATOR VARIANCE
arXiv:1710.01598v2 [stat.OT] 25 Oct 2017
ANTHONY D. BLAOM
Abstract. The classical Cramér-Rao inequality gives a lower bound for the
variance of a unbiased estimator of an unknown parameter, in some statistical
model of a random process. In this note we rewrite the statment and proof of
the bound using contemporary geometric language.
The Cramér-Rao inequality gives a lower bound for the variance of a unbiased
estimator of a parameter in some statistical model of a random process. Below is
a restatement and proof in sympathy with the underlying geometry the problem.
While our presentation is mildly novel, its mathematical content is very well-known.
Assuming some very basic familiarity with Riemannian geometry, and that one
has reformulated the bound appropriately, the essential parts of the proof boil
down to half a dozen lines. For completeness we explain the connection with loglikelihoods, and show how to recover the more usual statement in terms of the
Fisher information matrix. We thank Jakob Ströhl for helpful feedback.
1. The Cramér-Rao inequality
The mathematical setting of statistical inference consists of: (i) a smooth1 manifold X , the sample space, which we will suppose is finite-dimensional; and (ii) a
set P of probability measures on X , called the space of models or parameters. The
objective is to make inferences about an unknown model p ∈ P, given one or more
observations x ∈ X , drawn at random from X according to p.
Under certain regularity assumptions detailed below, this data suffices to make
X into a Riemannian manifold, whose geometric properties are related to problems
of statistical inference. It seems that Calyampudi Radhakrishna Rao was the first
to articulate this connection between geometry and statistics [2].
In formulating the Cramér-Rao inequality, we suppose that P is a smooth finitedimensional manifold (i.e., we are doing so-called parametric inference). We say
that P is regular if the probability measures p ∈ P are all Borel measures on X ,
and if there exists some positive Borel measure µ on X , hereafter called a reference
measure, such that
(1)
p = fp µ,
for some collection of smooth functions fp , p ∈ P, on X . The definition of regularity
furthermore requires that we may arrange (x, p) 7→ fp (x) to be jointly smooth.
1
In this note ‘smooth’ means C 2 .
1
2
ANTHONY D. BLAOM
An unbiased estimator of some smooth function θ : P → R (the “parameter”)
is a smooth function θ̂ : X → R whose expectation under each p ∈ P is precisely
θ(p):
Z
(2)
θ(p) = E(θ̂ | p) :=
θ̂(x) dp ;
p ∈ P.
x∈X
Theorem (Rao-Cramér [2, 1]). The space of models P determines a natural Riemannian metric on X , known as the Fisher-Rao metric, with respect to which there
is the following lower bound on the variance of an unbiased estimator θ̂ of θ:
V(θ̂ | p) > |∇θ(p)|2 ;
(3)
p ∈ P.
More informally: The parameter space P comes equipped with a natural way of
measuring distances, leading to a well-defined notion of steepest rate of ascent, for
any function θ on P. The square of this rate is precisely the lower bound for the
variance of an unbiased estimator θ̂.
2. Observation-dependent one-forms on the space of models
It is fundamental to the present geometric point of view that each observation
x ∈ X determines a one-form λx on the space P of models in the following way: Let
v ∈ Tp0 P be a tangent vector, understood as the derivative of some path t 7→ pt ∈ P
through p0 :
(4)
v=
d
pt
dt
t=0
.
Then, recalling that each pt is a probability measure on X (and P is regular) we
may write pt = gt p0 , for some smooth function gt : X → R, and define
d
gt (x)
dt
The proof of the following is straightforward:
λx (v) =
t=0
.
Lemma. E(λx (v) | p) = 0 for all p ∈ P and v ∈ Tp P.
Now if v ∈ Tp0 P is a tangent vector as in (4), and if (2) holds, then
Z
Z
Z
d
d
θ̂(x) dpt
=
θ̂(x)gt (x) dp0
=
θ̂(x)λx (v) dp0 ,
dθ(v) =
dt x∈X
dt x∈X
t=0
t=0
x∈X
giving us:
Proposition. For any unbiased estimator θ̂ : X → R of θ : P → R, one has
Z
dθ(v) =
θ̂(x)λx (v) dp;
v ∈ Tp P.
x∈X
A GEOMETER’S VIEW OF THE THE CRAMÉR-RAO BOUND ON ESTIMATOR VARIANCE3
3. Log-likelihoods
As an aside, we shall now see that the observation-dependent one-forms λx are
exact, and at the same time give their more usual interpretation in terms of loglikelihoods.
Choosing a reference measure µ, and defining fp as in (1), one defines the loglikelihood function (x, p) 7→ Lx (p) : X × P → R by
Lx (p) = log fp (x).
While the log-likelihood depends on the reference measure µ, its derivative dLx (a
one-form on P) does not, for in fact:
Lemma. dLx = λx .
Proof. With a reference measure fixed as in (1), we have, along a path t 7→ pt ,
pt = gt p0 , where gt = fpt /fp0 . Applying the definition of λx , we compute
d
d
d fpt (x)
d eLx (pt )
λx
=
=
.
= dLx
pt
pt
dt t=0
dt fp0 (x) t=0 dt eLx (p0 ) t=0
dt t=0
In particular, local maxima of Lx (points of so-called maximum likelihood) do not
depend on the reference measure.
4. The metric and derivation of the bound
With the observation-dependent one-forms in hand, we may now define the
Fisher-Rao Riemannian metric on P. It is given by
Z
I(u, v) =
λx (u)λx (v) dp , for u, v ∈ Tp P.
x∈X
Now that we have a metric, it is natural to consider ∇θ instead of dθ in Proposition
2. By the definition of gradient, we have
|∇θ(p)|2 = dθ(∇θ(p)).
This equation and Proposition 2 now gives, for any v ∈ Tp P,
Z
Z
2
|∇θ(p)| =
θ̂(x)λx (∇θ(p)) dp = (θ̂(x) − θ(p))λx (∇θ(p)) dp.
x∈X
R
The second equality holds because x∈X λx (∇θ(p)) dp = 0, by Lemma 2. Applying
the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality to the right-hand side gives
Z
1/2 Z
1/2
2
2
|∇θ(p)| 6
(θ̂(x) − θ(p)) dp
λx (∇θ(p))λx (∇θ(p)) dp
x∈X
x∈X
q
q
p
= V(θ̂ | p)) I(∇θ(p), ∇θ(p)) = V(θ̂ | p)) |∇θ(p)|.
The Cramér-Rao bound now follows.
4
ANTHONY D. BLAOM
5. The bound in terms of Fisher information
Theorem 1 is coordinate-free formulation. To recover the more usual statement
of the Cramér-Rao bound, let φ1 , . . . , φk be local coordinates on P, the space of
models on X , and ∂φ∂ 1 , . . . , ∂φ∂ k the corresponding vector fields on P, characterised
by
∂
= δij .
dφi
∂φj
Here δij = 1 if i = j and is zero otherwise. Applying Lemma 3, the coordinate
representation Iij of the Fisher-Rao metric I is given by
∂
Z
∂
∂
∂
Iij (p) = I
(p),
(p) =
dλx
(p) dλx
(p) dp
∂φi
∂φj
∂φi
∂φj
x∈X
Z
∂Lx
∂Lx
(p)
(p) dp,
=
∂φi
∂φj
x∈X
where Lx (p) = log fp (x) is the log-likelihood. In statistics Iij is known as the Fisher
information matrix.
For the moment we continue to let θ denote an arbitrary function on P, and θ̂
an unbiased estimate. Now ∇θ is the gradient of θ, with respect to the metric I.
Since the coordinate representation of the metric is Iij , a standard computation
gives the local coordinate formula
X
∂θ ∂
∇θ =
I ij
,
∂φ
∂φ
i
j
i,j
where {I ij } is the inverse of {Iij }. Regarding the lower bound in Theorem 1, we
compute
X
∂
∂θ
∂
∂θ
(p)
(p) , I mn (p)
(p)
(p)
|∇θ(p)|2 = I(∇θ(p), ∇θ(p)) =
I I ij (p)
∂φi
∂φj
∂φm
∂φn
i,j,m,n
∂
X
∂θ
∂θ
∂
=
I ij (p)I mn (p)
(p)
(p) I
(p),
(p)
∂φi ∂φm
∂φj
∂φn
i,j,m,n
X
∂θ
∂θ
(p)
(p)
=
I ij (p)Ijn (p)I mn (p)
∂φi
∂φm
i,j,m,n
X
X
∂θ
∂θ
∂θ
∂θ
=
δin I mn (p)
(p)
(p) =
I mi (p)
(p)
(p).
∂φi
∂φm
∂φi
∂φm
i,m,n
i,m
Theorem 1 now reads
V(θ̂ | p) >
X
i,m
I mi (p)
∂θ
∂θ
(p)
(p).
∂φi ∂φm
A GEOMETER’S VIEW OF THE THE CRAMÉR-RAO BOUND ON ESTIMATOR VARIANCE5
In particular, if we suppose θ is one of the coordinate functions, say θ = φj , then
we obtain
X
X
∂φj
∂φj
V(φ̂j | p) >
I mi (p)
(p)
(p) =
I mi δji δjm = I jj (p),
∂φ
∂φ
i
m
i,m
i,m
the version of the Cramér-Rao bound to be found in statistics textbooks.
References
[1] Harald Cramér. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 9.
Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1946.
[2] C. Radhakrishna Rao. Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical
parameters. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 37:81–91, 1945.
E-mail: [email protected]
| 10math.ST
|
Noname manuscript No.
(will be inserted by the editor)
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
Zhe Yu · Nicholas A. Kraft · Tim Menzies
arXiv:1612.03224v5 [cs.SE] 2 Feb 2018
the date of receipt and acceptance should be inserted later
Abstract Literature reviews can be time-consuming and tedious to complete. By cataloging
and refactoring three state-of-the-art active learning techniques from evidence-based medicine
and legal electronic discovery, this paper finds and implements FASTREAD, a faster technique for studying a large corpus of documents, combining and parametrizing the most
efficient active learning algorithms. This paper assesses FASTREAD using datasets generated
from existing SE literature reviews (Hall, Wahono, Radjenović, Kitchenham et al.). Compared
to manual methods, FASTREAD lets researchers find 95% relevant studies after reviewing
an order of magnitude fewer papers. Compared to other state-of-the-art automatic methods,
FASTREAD reviews 20-50% fewer studies while finding same number of relevant primary
studies in a systematic literature review.
Keywords Active Learning · Systematic Literature Review · Software Engineering · Primary
Study Selection
1 Errarta
This version contains updated results after fixing issues in previous datasets. The new results
make the same overall conclusion as before; i.e. FASTREAD is best. The authors thank
Chandramouli Shama Sastry for pointing out those issues in the datasets. The updated datasets
are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1162952.
Zhe Yu
Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Nicholas A. Kraft
ABB Corporate Research, Raleigh, NC, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Tim Menzies
Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Zhe Yu et al.
2 Introduction
When conducting a literature review in software engineering, it is common practice [30]
to conduct a primary study selection where a large number of potentially relevant papers,
collected via some initial query (e.g. keyword search in Google Scholar), are manually
reviewed and assessed for relevance. To reduce the effort associated with conducting such
tedious and time-consuming linear manual reviews, researchers in the fields of evidencebased medicine [47, 60, 62] and electronic discovery [11, 12] have developed active learning
methods that can build an automatic classifier that prunes away irrelevant papers using
feedback from users.
In this paper we investigate whether there are any insights from that related work that can
reduce the effort associated with literature reviews in software engineering (SE). Specifically,
in this paper we:
– Review those active learning methods [11, 12, 47, 60, 62] and find that in evidence-based
medicine and legal electronic discovery, there are three widely recognized state-of-the-art
active learning methods [11, 40, 62].
– Analyze those three active learning methods and find that they are each assembled from
lower-level techniques that address four questions: (1) when to start training, (2) which
study to query next, (3) whether to stop training, and (4) how to balance the training data.
– Investigate 32 possible active learning approaches that represent different combinations
of lower-level techniques to address the four questions.
– Evaluate the 32 active learning approaches using SE data and the evaluation criteria
“work saved over sampling at 95% recall” (WSS@95) [8].
– Discover that one of those 32 active learning approaches, which we call FASTREAD,
reduces the effort required to find relevant papers the most.
Based on that work, the contributions and outcomes of this paper are:
1. A cautionary tale that verbatim reuse of data mining methods from other fields may
not produce the best results for SE. Specifically, we show that supposed state-of-the-art
methods from other fields do not work best on SE data.
2. A case study showing the value of refactoring and recombining data mining methods.
The FASTREAD tool recommended by this paper was constructed via such refactoring.
3. A demonstration that FASTREAD is a new highwater mark in reducing the effort associated with primary study selection in SE literature reviews.
4. A open source workbench that allows for the fast evaluation of FASTREAD, or any other
technology assisted reading method. See https://github.com/fastread/src.
5. Four new data sets that enable extensive evaluation of FASTREAD or other methods.
The creation and distribution of these data sets is an important contribution, because prior
to this study, it was very difficult to obtain even one such data set.
The rest of this paper offers background notes on the problem of reading technical documents
and on how that problem has been solved in other fields. We then refactor those solution
into 32 candidate solutions, which we asses using prominent published SE literature reviews.
Using that data, we ask and answer the following three research questions:
– RQ1: Can active learning techniques reduce effort in primary study selection? We
find that using FASTREAD, after reviewing a few hundred papers, it is possible to find
95% of the relevant papers found by a linear manual review of thousands of papers.
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
3
– RQ2: Should we just adopt the state-of-the-art treatments from other fields? Our
results show that better active learners for SE can be build by mixing and matching
methods from the state-of-the-art in other fields.
– RQ3: How much effort can FASTREAD, our new state-of-the-art method for primary study selection, save in an SLR? We show that FASTREAD can reduce more
than 40% of the effort associated with the primary selection study phase of a literature
review while retrieving 95% of the relevant studies.
3 Background
Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are a well established and widely applied review
method in Software Engineering since Kitchenham, Dybå, and Jørgensen first adopted it to
support evidence-based software engineering in 2004 and 2005 [14, 32]. Researchers can
get a general idea of current activity in their field of interests by reading the SLR studies.
Furthermore, a deeper understanding of the topic may be gained by conducting an SLR.
An increasing number of SLRs has been conducted since the proposal and revision of the
SLR guidelines in 2007 [29]. For example, there were 26 SLRs on IEEE Xplore during the
year of 2005 and that number has increased to 137, 199 for the years 2010, 2015 (respectively).
Various scholars suggest that an SLR is required before any research in Software Engineering
is conducted [29]. While this is certainly a good advice, currently an SLR is a large, time
consuming and complex task [5, 6, 24, 25].
Cost reduction in SLRs is therefore an important topic and will benefit researchers in
software engineering community. Previously we have analyzed the costs of SLRs [6, 25]. As
shown in Fig. 1, primary study selection, which is noted as “selecting papers” in Fig. 1, is
among the top three most difficult as well as time-consuming aspects in an SLR. Usually,
reviewers need to evaluate thousands of studies trying to find dozens of them that are relevant
to the research questions based on their title, abstract, or full text [5]. An extreme example
of this is where reviewers sourced over 3,000 studies, and only used 7 of them in their
final review [2]. In terms of actual cost, Malheiros has documented that it requires 3 hours
for one reviewer to review 100 studies [36]. This implies that it is a month’s work for one
graduate student to review 3000 studies or three months’ work to review 9000 studies. The
cost associated with primary study selection has become a serious problem and will continue
(a) Most Difficult Aspects of SLR Process.
(b) Most Time Consuming Aspects of SLR Process.
Fig. 1: Data collected from surveys to SLR authors [6]. green , red , and blue show the most,
second most, and third most, respectively voted item.
4
Zhe Yu et al.
to grow in the near future as the population of candidates for primary studies increases
dramatically. In this paper, we focus on reducing cost in primary study selection only. Our
prioritization on the cost reductions of primary study selection is not to discount the effort
associated with other parts of the SLR process. Indeed, one of our considerations is that there
are already tools to support other parts of the SLR process, as well as different techniques to
facilitate primary study selection. All these techniques (such as Quasi-Gold Standard based
search [65, 66], visual text mining [16, 18, 19, 36], and snowballing [27, 63]) are compatible
with works in this paper and a better performance is expected when applied together. This
leads to a direction of future work in which the best setting to integrate different techniques
will be explored.
There are three main aspects in primary study selection: (1) retrieving initial list of
primary studies, (2) excluding irrelevant studies, (3) including missing studies. We focus on
excluding irrelevant studies because a) there already exists techniques and tools to facilitate
(1) and (3) such as Snowballing [27] and StArt [26]; b) the performance of excluding
irrelevant studies can be evaluated using existing SLR publications.
3.1 Related Work
3.1.1 Software Engineering Tools
In recent years, various tools have been developed to facilitate SLRs in the software engineering community, as summarized in the associated SLRs [37–39]. These tools aim at providing
support for protocol development [20, 26, 41], automated search [26, 41], primary study selection [5, 20, 26, 41], quality assessment [5, 20, 41], data extraction and validation [5, 20, 26, 41],
data synthesis [5, 20, 26, 41], and report write up [5, 20, 26, 41]. It is extremely helpful to
have a tool for managing the whole SLR process. However, the support for primary study
selection using these tools is limited (e.g., to tasks such as assigning review jobs to multiple
reviewers or to resolving disagreements). Hence, we planned to introduce machine learning
to assist primary study selection in SE SLRs but before this paper is published, Ros et al. [50]
has achieved this in June 2017. While Ros’17 [50] provided a wide range of techniques
to support both search and selection, it has several limitations such as (a) not comparing
against state-of-the-art techniques from other domains (which are approaches discussed later
in Section 3.1.2 and 3.1.3); (b) not considering any data balancing; (c) testing only on a single
unpublished dataset.
Visual text mining (VTM) is a technique especially explored in Software Engineering
community to support SLR. It is an unsupervised learning method which visualizes the
relationship between candidate studies and helps the reviewer to make quick decisions.
Malheiros et al. [36] first applied VTM to support primary study selection in SLR. In their
small-scale experiment (100 candidate studies, 31 of which are “relevant”), VTM retrieves
around 90% of the “relevant” studies by spending about 30% as much time as manual
review. However, VTM requires some prior experience and knowledge of text mining and
visualization techniques to use [5], and more case studies with large scale are needed to
validate their results.
Snowballing is another technique attracting much attention in SE SLR research. Given the
inherent relevance relationship between a study and its citations, it is of high probability for the
citations of (used in backward snowballing) and the studies cite (used in forward snowballing)
a known “relevant” study to also be “relevant” [32]. Jalali and Wohlin [27, 63] applied
backward snowballing to search for primary studies in SE SLRs and found comparably good
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
5
result as database search. Felizardo et al. [17] and Wohlin [64] applied forward snowballing
to update SE SLRs and greatly reduced the number studies need to be reviewed comparing to
a database search. This paper does not use snowballing since, as mentioned by Wohlin [63],
snowballing starts with an initial set of relevant papers. FASTREAD’s task is very different:
we start with zero relevant papers.
3.1.2 Legal Electronic Discovery Tools
Electronic Discovery (e-discovery) is a part of civil litigation where one party (the producing
party), offers up materials which are pertinent to a legal case [33]. This involves a review task
where the producing party need to retrieve every “relevant” document in their possession and
turn them over to the requesting party. It is extremely important to reduce the review cost
in e-discovery since in a common case, the producing party will need to retrieve thousands
of “relevant” documents among millions of candidates. Technology-assisted review (TAR)
is the technique to facilitate the review process. The objective of TAR is to find as many
of the “relevant” documents in a collection as possible, with reasonable cost [22]. Various
machine learning algorithms have been studied in TAR. So far, in every controlled studies,
continuous active learning (Cormack’14) has outperformed others [11, 12], which makes it
the state-of-the-art method in legal electronic discovery. It has also been selected as a baseline
method in the total recall track of TREC 2015 [49]. Details on continuous active learning are
provided in Section 4.
3.1.3 Evidence-based Medicine Tools
Systematic literature reviews were first adopted from evidence-based medicine in 2004 [32].
To facilitate citation screening (primary study selection) in systematic review, many groups of
researchers have investigated different types of machine learning algorithms and evaluation
mechanisms [46, 47].
Cohen et al. first applied text mining techniques to support citation screening and developed several performance metrics (including WSS@95) for assessing the performance
of different techniques in 2006 [10]. While the great contribution of introducing machine
learning and text mining into citation screening as well as the proposed performance metrics
of Cohen has been widely acknowledged [46], most of Cohen’s work focused on supervised
learning which does not utilize unlabeled data and relies on random sampling to obtain the
sufficiently large training set [7–10].
Wallace et al. conducted a series of studies with machine learning techniques, especially
active learning [42, 57–62]. Wallace first set up a baseline approach called “patient active
learning” (Wallace’10) for machine learning assisted citation screening [62]. The performance
of patient active learning is good enough (nearly 100% of the “relevant” citations can be
retrieved at half of the conventional review cost) to convince systematic review conductors to
adopt machine learning assisted citation screening. Instead of improving this baseline method,
Wallace then focused on other aspects of machine learning assisted citation screening such as
introducing external expert knowledge [60], allocating review tasks to multiple experts [61]
or to crowdsourcing workers [42], and building a tool called abstrackr to provide overall
support [59]. Wallace’s work on this topic is of exemplary high-impact and his core algorithm
(on simple expert screening), is one of the most popular active learning techniques we have
found in the evidence-based medical literature. That said, this technique has not been updated
since 2010 [62]. In this paper we are focused on the core active learning algorithm for cost
6
Zhe Yu et al.
minimization. Hence, we do not explore techniques such as Wallace’s use of multiple experts
(but in future work, we will explore this approach).
More recent work of Miwa et al. explored alternative data balancing and query strategy
in 2014 [40] and proposed a new treatment of Certainty plus Weighting (Miwa’14). Instead
of uncertainty sampling in patient active learning (Wallace’10), Miwa found that certainty
sampling provides better results in clinical citation screening tasks. Similar conclusion for
data balancing method as weighting relevant examples was found to be more effective than
aggressive undersampling. Although not stated explicitly, Certainty plus Weighting keeps
training until all “relevant” studies have been discovered, which differs from the stopping
criteria of Wallace’10. Aside from the core algorithm, additional views from latent Dirichlet
allocation (LDA) has been found to be potentially useful.
Other work related to machine learning assisted citation screening do not utilize active
learning. Pure supervised learning requires a sufficiently large training set, which leads to a
huge review cost [1, 10]. Semi-supervised learning [35] does not utilize the human reviewers’
feedback for updating the model, which leads to a depreciated performance in a long run. As
a result, the patient active learning proposed by Wallace et al. [62] and the Certainty plus
Weighting approach by Miwa et al. [40] are still considered to be the state-of-the-art method
for citation screening in the scenario with no external knowledge and equally expensive
reviewers. Details on these two approaches are provided in Section 4.
There are also existing tools to support study selection in systematic reviews, e.g. Abstrakr1 [59], EPPI-Reviewer2 [54], Rayaan3 [45]. Useful features can be found in these tools
such as a) Rayaan and EPPI-Reviewer: incorporated keyword search in screening; b) Rayaan
and EPPI-Reviewer: deduplication; c) Rayaan and EPPI-Reviewer: define inclusion/exclusion
criteria by terms; d) Abstrakr: user defined tags; e) all three: assign review tasks to multiple
reviewers; f) all three: automatically extract data from PubMed. However, the active learning
parts alone in these tools are depreciated. Under the condition that no additional feature
(search, tags, define inclusion/exclusion terms) is used, we tried all three tools with one of our
dataset– Hall set (104 relevant in 8911 studies) and after reviewing 1000 studies, only 10 to
15 relevant ones were found, which was very close to a random sampling result without any
learning. Since none of these tools are open-source, we cannot tell whether active learning is
applied or how/when it is applied in each tool. This motivates us to develop an open source
tool which focuses on active learning to support the primary study selection process. Details
about our tool are presented in Section 7.
4 Technical Details
As mentioned in Section 3.1, the existing state-of-the-art methods are Wallace’10 [62] (patient
active learning), Miwa’14 [40] (Certainty plus Weighting), and Cormack’14 [11] (continuous
active learning). All three state-of-the-art methods share the following common techniques.
Support vector machines (SVM) are a well-known and widely used classification
technique. The idea behind is to map input data to a high-dimension feature space and then
construct a linear decision plane in that feature space [13]. Linear SVM [28] has been proved
to be a useful model in SE text mining [33] and is applied in the state-of-the-art active
learning methods of both evidence-based medicine and electronic discovery [11, 40, 62]. One
1
2
3
http://abstrackr.cebm.brown.edu
http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/er4/
http://rayyan.qcri.org/
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
(a) No data balancing
(b) With weighting
7
(c) With aggressive undersampling.
Fig. 2: Active learning with SVM and different data balancing techniques.
drawback of SVM is its poor interpretability as compared to classifiers like decision trees.
However, SVM still fits here since the model itself is not important as long as it could provide
a relative ranking of literature.
Active learning is a cost-aware machine learning algorithm where labels of training data
can be acquired with certain costs. The key idea behind active learning is that a machine
learning algorithm can perform better with less training if it is allowed to choose the data
from which it learns [52]. There are several scenarios active learning is applied to, such as
membership query synthesis, stream-based selective sampling, and pool-based sampling [51].
There are also different query strategies of active learning, such as uncertainty sampling,
query-by-committee, expected model change, expected error reduction, variance reduction,
and density-weighted methods [51]. Here, we briefly introduce one scenario and two query
strategies, which are used in our later experiments and discussions.
Figure 2 shows a simple demonstration of an SVM active-learner. For the sake of
simplicity, this demonstration assumes that the data has two features (shown in that figure
as the horizontal and vertical axis). In that figure, “O” is the minority class, “relevant”
studies in SLR. “O”s in blue are studies already identified as “relevant” (included) by human
reviewers. “X ” is the majority class, “irrelevant” studies in SLR. “X ”s in red are studies
already identified as “irrelevant” (excluded) by human reviewers (note that in (c), some red
“X ”s are removed from the training set by aggressive undersampling). Markers in gray are
the unlabeled studies (studies have not been reviewed yet), and black line is SVM decision
plane. In (b) Weighting balances the training data by putting more weight on the minority
class examples. In (c), aggressive undersampling balances the training data by throwing
away majority class examples closest to the old decision plane in (a). When deciding which
studies to be reviewed next, uncertainty sampling returns the unlabeled examples closest to
the decision plane (U) while certainty sampling returns the unlabeled examples furthest to
the decision plane from the bottom-left side (C).
By analyzing the differences between the state-of-the-art methods, we identified the
following key components in solving the problem with active learning and linear SVM.
When to start training:
– P stands for “patient”. As suggested by Wallace et al. [62], “hasty generation”, which
means start training with too few relevant examples, may lead to poor performance. The
algorithm keeps random sampling until a sufficient number of “relevant” studies are
retrieved. In our experiments, the sufficient number of “relevant” studies retrieved is
set to 5, which means when at least 5 “relevant” studies have been retrieved by random
8
Zhe Yu et al.
sampling, the algorithm goes into next stage. Wallace’10 [62] and Miwa’14 [40] use P
for when to start training.
– H stands for “hasty”, which is the opposite of P. The algorithm starts training as soon as
ONE “relevant” study is retrieved, as suggested in Cormack’14 [11, 12].
Which document to query next:
– U stands for “uncertainty sampling”. The algorithm utilizes uncertainty sampling to build
the classifier, where unlabeled examples closest to the SVM decision plane are sampled
for query (U in Figure 2). Wallace’10 [62] uses U for Query strategy.
– C stands for “certainty sampling”. The algorithm utilizes certainty sampling to build the
classifier, where unlabeled examples furthest to the SVM decision plane and lie in the
“relevant” side are sampled for query (C in Figure 2). Miwa’14 [40] and Cormack’14 [11,
12] use C for query strategy.
Whether to stop training (or not):
– S stands for “stop training”. The algorithm stops training once the classifier is stable. In
our experiments, the classifier is treated as stable once more than 30 “relevant” studies
have been retrieved as training examples. Wallace’10 [62] uses S for whether to stop
training.
– T stands for “continue training”. The algorithm never stops training as suggested in
Cormack’14 [11] and Miwa’14 [40]. If query strategy is U, algorithm switches to certainty
sampling after classifier is stable but training never stops.
How to balance the training data:
– N stands for “no data balancing”. The algorithm does not balance the training data
(demonstrated in Figure 2a) as suggested by Cormack’14 [11].
– A stands for “aggressive undersampling”. The algorithm utilizes aggressive undersampling4 after classifier is stable, as suggested by Wallace’10 [62].
– W stands for “Weighting”. The algorithm utilizes Weighting5 for data balancing (before
and after the classifier is stable), as suggested by Miwa’14 [40].
– M stands for “mixing of Weighting and aggressive undersampling”. Weighting is applied
before the classifier is stable while aggressive undersampling is applied after the classifier
is stable. This treatment comes from the observation that “Weighting” performs better in
early stages while “aggressive undersampling” performs better in later stages.
By combining different approaches, we ended up with 32 possible treatments including the
state-of-the-art methods:
– The PUSA approach advocated by Wallace’10 [62].
– The PCTW approach advocated by Miwa’14 [40].
– The HCTN approach advocated by Cormack’14 [11].
Pseudo code for the 32 machine learning treatments are shown in Algorithm 1. Along with
the current standard procedure as a baseline approach:
– Linear Review: no machine learning, query studies in a random order.
4 Aggressive undersampling throws away majority (irrelevant) training examples closest to SVM decision
plane until reaching the same number of minority (relevant) training examples. A demonstration is shown in
Figure 2c.
5 Weighting assigns different weight to each class, W = 1/|L |, W = 1/|L |, when training SVM.
R
R
I
I
A demonstration is shown in Figure 2b. LR is defined in Figure 3.
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
All 32 machine learning treatments are tested and compared in Section 5.
9
10
Zhe Yu et al.
Algorithm 1: Psuedo Code
Input
:E, set of all candidate studies
R, set of ground truth relevant studies
AL, algorithm code, e.g. PUSA for
Wallace’10 treatment
:LR , set of included studies
Output
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
L ← ∅;
LR ← ∅;
¬L ← E;
// Keep reviewing until stopping
rule satisfied
while |LR | < 0.95|R| do
// Start training or not
if |LR | ≥ Enough(AL) then
if T ∈ AL or N otStable(LR ) then
CL ← T rain(AL, L);
// Query next
x ← Query(AL, CL, ¬L, LR );
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
else
// Random Sampling
x ← Random(¬L);
// Simulate review
L ← L ∪ x;
¬L ← ¬L \ x;
if x ∈ R then
LR ← LR ∪ x;
The algorithm on this page use the following notation.
– E: the set of all candidate studies
(returned from search).
– R ⊂ E: the set of ground truth relevant studies.
– I = E \ R: the set of ground truth
irrelevant studies.
– L ⊂ E: the set of labeled/reviewed
studies, each review reveals whether
a study x ∈ R, but incurs a cost.
– ¬L = E \ L: the set of unlabeled/unreviewed studies.
– LR = L ∩ R: the identified relevant
(included) studies.
– LI = L ∩ I: the identified irrelevant
(excluded) studies.
The general form of the excluding irrelevant studies problem can be described
as following: start with L = ∅, prioritize which studies to be reviewed so as
to maximize |LR | while minimizing |L|
(identify more relevant studies with less
cost).
Fig. 3: Notations and Problem Description
return LR ;
Support functions for Algorithm 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
t1 ← 5;
t2 ← 30;
Function Enough(AL)
if P ∈ AL then
return t1;
else if H ∈ AL then
return 1;
else
return ∞;
Function NotStable(LR )
if |LR | ≥ t2 then return False ;
else return True ;
Function Train(AL, L)
if W ∈ AL or M ∈ AL then
// Train linear SVM with Weighting
CL ← SV M (L, kernel = linear, class weight = balanced);
else
// Train linear SVM
CL ← SV M (L, kernel = linear);
22
if A ∈ AL or M ∈ AL then
if ¬ NotStable(LR ) then
// Aggressive undersampling
LI ← L \ LR ;
tmp ← argsort(CL.decision f unction(LI ))[: |LR |];
CL ← SV M (LR ∪ tmp, kernel = linear);
23
return CL;
18
19
20
21
24
25
26
27
28
29
Function Query(AL, CL, ¬L, LR )
if U ∈ AL and N otStable(LR ) then
// Uncertainty Sampling
x ← argsort(abs(CL.decision f unction(¬L)))[0];
else
// Certainty Sampling
x ← argsort(CL.decision f unction(¬L))[−1];
return x;
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
11
5 Experiments
This section describes the experimental procedures that we used to evaluate the treatments
described in Section 4.
5.1 Performance Metrics
As shown in Figure 3, the problem to be solved is multi-objective. The performance of each
algorithm is thus usually evaluated by its recall (|LR |/|R|) vs. studies reviewed (|L|) curve.
This performance metrics is suggested by Cormack et al. [11,12,55] and best fits the objectives
of excluding irrelevant studies problem. To enable a statistical analysis of the performances,
the recall vs. studies reviewed curve is cut by a 0.95 recall line where studies reviewed
(|L|) when reaching 0.95 recall (|LR | ≥ 0.95|R|) is used to assess performances. The reason
behind 0.95 recall is that a) 1.00 recall can never be guaranteed by any text mining method
unless all the candidate studies are reviewed; b) 0.95 recall is usually considered acceptable
in evidence-based medicine [8, 10, 46] despite the fact that there might still be “relevant”
studies missing [53]. As a result, two metrics are used for evaluation:
– X95 = min{|L| | |LR | ≥ 0.95|R|}.
– WSS@95 = 0.95 − X95/|P |.
Note that one algorithm is better than the other if its X95 is smaller or WSS@95 [8] is larger.
5.2 Datasets
Although a large number of SLRs are published every year, there is no dataset clearly
documenting the details in primary study selection. As a result, three datasets are created
reverse-engineering existing SLRs and being used in this study to simulate the process of
excluding irrelevant studies. The three datasets are named after the authors of their original
publication source– Wahono dataset from Wahono et al. 2015 [56], Hall dataset from Hall et
al. 2012 [23], and Radjenović dataset from Radjenović et al. 2013 [48].
For each of the datasets, the search string S and the final inclusion list F from the original
publication are used for the data collection. We retrieve the initial candidate collection E
from IEEE Xplore with the search string (slightly modified to meet the requirement of IEEE
Xplore). Then make a final list of inclusion R as R = F ∩ E. Here, for simplicity we only
extract candidate studies from IEEE Xplore. We will explore possibilities for efficiently
utilizing multiple data sources in the future work but in this paper, without loss of generality,
we only extract initial candidate list from single data source. In this way, we created three
datasets that reasonably resemble real SLR selection results assuming that any study outside
the final inclusion list F is irrelevant to the original SLRs. A summary of the created datasets
is presented in Table 1.
Apart from the three created datasets, one dataset (Kitchenham) is provided directly by
the author of Kitchenham et al. 2010 [31] and includes two levels of relevance information.
In general, only the “content relevant” labels are used in experiments for a fair comparison
with other datasets. Additionally, the “abstract relevant” labels are used for detailed review
cost analysis in RQ3. Summary of Kitchenham dataset is also presented in Table 1.
All the above datasets are available on-line at Seacraft, Zenodo6 .
6
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1162952
12
Zhe Yu et al.
Table 1: Descriptive statistics for experimental datasets
Datasets
Generated
Original
#Candidate |E| #Relevant |R| #Candidate #Relevant |F|
Wahono
7002
62
2117
72
Hall
8911
104
2073
136
Radjenović
6000
48
13126
106
Kitchenham
1704
45 (132)
1704
45 (132)
Our datasets are generated using information in the original SLR literature. Our candidate studies are retrieved
by applying similar if not the same the search string from original SLR literature and search in IEEE Xplore.
The set of our relevant studies is the intersection of the set of our candidate studies and the set of final included
studies in the original SLR literature. Kitchenham dataset is different as it is provided directly by Kitchenham
and it has two level of relevance labels– 132 relevant studies by title and abstract review and within which, 45
relevant studies by content review.
5.3 Simulation Studies
In the following, each experiment is a simulation of one specific treatment on one dataset.
More specifically, there is no human activity involved in these experiments, when asked for a
label, the true label in the dataset is queried instead of a human reviewer. As a result, each
experiment can be repeated with different random seed to capture variances and also makes
reproducing the experiments possible.
5.4 Controlled Variables
For the sake of a fair comparison, different treatments in Section 4 share an identical set of
controlled variables including preprocessing, featurization and classifier.
Each candidate study in the initial list is first tokenized by stop words removal after
concatenating its title and abstract. After tokenization, the bag of words are featurized into
a term frequency vector. Then, reduce the dimensionality of the term frequency vector
with to keep only M = 4000 of the terms with highest tf-idf7 score and normalize the
hashed matrix by its L2 norm each row at last. TfidfVectorizer in scikit-learn is utilized for
the above preprocessing and featurization steps. Alternatives such as stemming, LDA [3],
paragraph vectors [34] require further exploration and are scheduled in our future works. All
32 treatments use the same classifier– linear SVM from scikit-learn.
6 Results
All the following results were generated from 30 repeats simulations, using different random
number seeds from each simulation. As shown below, all our results are reported in terms of
medians (50th percentile) and iqrs ((75-25)th percentile).
7
For term t in document d, T f idf (t, d) = wdt × (log
P
frequency of term t in document d. For term t, T f idf (t) =
(log
P
|D|
t)
sgn(wd
d∈D
+ 1) and is used for feature selection.
|D|
t)
sgn(wd
d∈D
P
+ 1) where wit is the term
P
t
d∈D T f idf (t, d) =
d∈D wd ×
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
13
Table 2: Scott-Knott analysis for number of studies reviewed/ work saved over sampling to
reach 95% recall
Wahono
X95
WSS@95
Rank Treatment Median IQR Median IQR
1
HUTM
670 230
0.85 0.04
1
HCTM
740 220
0.84 0.03
2
HUTA
780 140
0.84 0.02
2
HCTW
790
90
0.84 0.02
2
HUTW
800 110
0.84 0.02
2
HCTA
800 140
0.83 0.02
3
PCTM
1150 450
0.78 0.07
3
PUTM
1180 420
0.78 0.07
3
PCTA
1190 340
0.78 0.05
3
PUTA
1190 340
0.78 0.05
3
PCTW
1210 350
0.78 0.06
3
PUTW
1220 370
0.77 0.06
4
HUSM
1410 400
0.75 0.06
5
HUSA
1610 370
0.72 0.07
6
PUSM
1810 370
0.69 0.06
6
PUSA
1910 700
0.67 0.10
7
HUSW
2220 400
0.63 0.06
7
PUSW
2240 360
0.63 0.06
8
HUTN
2700
40
0.56 0.01
8
HCTN
2720
40
0.56 0.01
8
PCSW
2860 1320
0.54 0.20
8
PCSM
2860 1320
0.54 0.20
8
PCTN
2850 1130
0.54 0.17
8
PUTN
2850 1130
0.54 0.17
9
PCSN
3020 1810
0.51 0.26
9
PCSA
3020 1810
0.51 0.26
10
HUSN
4320 110
0.33 0.03
10
PUSN
4370 1290
0.32 0.19
11
linear
6650
0
0
0
11
HCSA
6490 2760
-0.01 0.39
11
HCSN
6490 2760
-0.01 0.39
11
HCSM
6490 3110
-0.01 0.44
11
HCSW
6490 3110
-0.01 0.44
Radjenović
X95
WSS@95
Rank Treatment Median IQR Median IQR
1
HUTM
680 180
0.83 0.03
1
HCTM
780 130
0.82 0.02
1
HCTA
790 180
0.82 0.03
1
HUTA
800 180
0.82 0.03
2
HUSA
890 310
0.80 0.06
2
HUSM
890 270
0.80 0.05
3
HUTW
960
80
0.79 0.02
3
HCTW
980
60
0.79 0.01
3
HUSW
1080 410
0.77 0.07
4
PCTM
1150 270
0.76 0.05
4
PUTM
1150 270
0.76 0.05
5
HUTN
1250 100
0.74 0.02
5
PCTA
1260 210
0.74 0.05
5
PUTA
1260 210
0.74 0.05
5
HCTN
1270
70
0.74 0.02
5
PUSM
1250 400
0.74 0.07
5
PUSW
1250 450
0.73 0.08
5
PUTW
1350 310
0.72 0.06
5
PCTW
1370 310
0.72 0.06
5
PUSA
1400 490
0.71 0.09
6
HUSN
1570 300
0.69 0.05
6
PCTN
1600 360
0.68 0.06
6
PUTN
1600 360
0.68 0.06
7
PUSN
1890 320
0.64 0.06
8
PCSW
2250 940
0.57 0.20
8
PCSM
2250 940
0.57 0.20
9
PCSN
2840 1680
0.47 0.31
9
PCSA
2840 1680
0.47 0.31
10
HCSA
5310 2140
0.07 0.36
10
HCSN
5310 2140
0.07 0.36
10
HCSM
5320 2200
0.02 0.37
10
HCSW
5320 2200
0.02 0.37
10
linear
5700
0
0
0
Hall
Rank
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
X95
WSS@95
Treatment Median IQR Median IQR
HUTW
340
90
0.91 0.01
HUTA
340 130
0.91 0.02
HUTM
350 120
0.91 0.01
HCTW
370
60
0.91 0.01
HUTN
370
90
0.91 0.01
HCTM
380 100
0.91 0.01
HCTA
390 150
0.91 0.02
HCTN
410
80
0.90 0.01
HUSM
530 120
0.89 0.01
HUSW
560 250
0.89 0.03
PCTW
610 210
0.88 0.02
PUTW
610 220
0.88 0.03
HUSA
630 170
0.88 0.02
PCTN
650 220
0.88 0.03
PUTN
650 220
0.88 0.03
PUTM
670 220
0.87 0.03
PCTM
680 230
0.87 0.03
PCTA
700 210
0.87 0.03
PUTA
700 220
0.87 0.03
PUSW
740 230
0.87 0.03
PUSM
770 240
0.86 0.03
PUSA
880 270
0.85 0.04
PCSW
1150 570
0.82 0.07
PCSM
1150 570
0.82 0.07
PCSN
1530 1050
0.78 0.13
PCSA
1530 1050
0.78 0.13
PUSN
1550 1120
0.77 0.13
HUSN
1800 1020
0.74 0.11
HCSA
7470 5980
0.03 0.67
HCSN
7470 5980
0.03 0.67
linear
8464
0
0
0
HCSM
8840 6060
-0.04 0.68
HCSW
8840 6060
-0.04 0.68
Kitchenham
X95
WSS@95
Rank Treatment Median IQR Median IQR
1
HUSA
590 170
0.60 0.19
1
HUTA
590
80
0.60 0.06
1
HUSM
620
70
0.58 0.04
1
HUTM
630 110
0.58 0.07
1
PUSA
640 130
0.57 0.08
1
HUSW
640 140
0.57 0.09
2
HUTN
680
30
0.55 0.02
2
HCTA
680 100
0.55 0.08
2
PUSM
680
90
0.55 0.06
2
HCTM
680 110
0.55 0.07
2
PCTM
690
90
0.54 0.06
2
PUTM
690
70
0.54 0.05
2
PUTA
710 110
0.53 0.08
2
HUTW
710
20
0.53 0.02
3
PUSW
720 110
0.52 0.08
3
PCTA
720 100
0.52 0.08
3
HCTN
730
60
0.52 0.04
3
HCTW
750
60
0.51 0.04
3
PUTN
750
80
0.51 0.05
4
PCTN
750
80
0.51 0.05
4
PUTW
780
70
0.49 0.04
4
PCTW
780 150
0.49 0.09
5
PUSN
800 140
0.47 0.09
5
HUSN
870 280
0.43 0.16
6
PCSW
990 330
0.35 0.19
6
PCSM
990 330
0.35 0.19
6
PCSN
1050 370
0.32 0.24
6
PCSA
1050 370
0.32 0.24
7
linear
1615
0
0
0
7
HCSA
1670
60
-0.04 0.04
7
HCSN
1670
60
-0.04 0.04
7
HCSM
1680
60
-0.04 0.04
7
HCSW
1680
60
-0.04 0.04
Simulations are repeated for 30 times, medians (50th percentile) and iqrs ((75-25)th percentile) are presented.
Smaller/larger median value for X95/WSS@95 represents better performance while smaller iqr means better
stability. Treatments with same rank have no significant difference in performance while treatments of smaller
number in rank are significantly better than those of larger number in rank. The recommended treatment
FASTREAD is colored in green while the state-of-the-art treatments are colored in red and linear review is
colored in blue .
14
Zhe Yu et al.
RQ1: Can active learning techniques reduce effort in primary study selection?
In Table 2, we tested 32 active learning treatments and linear review. According to the
results, most active learning treatments perform consistently better than linear review (colored
in blue ) on all four datasets while four treatments (HCS*) can be even worse than linear
review. Interestingly these four treatments share same codes of HCS, which hastily start
training (H) with greedy query strategy (C) and give up the attempt to correct the model
short after (S). The problem of “hasty generation” is maximized in the setting of HCS and
thus leads to an even worse performance than linear review. In general, other active learning
treatments can reduce review costs by allowing the reviewer to read fewer studies while still
find 95% of the relevant ones. As for how much effort can be saved, RQ3 will answer the
question in details.
Based on the above, we say:
Finding 1
In general, active learning techniques can reduce cost in primary study selections with a
sacrifice of (say 5%) recall.
RQ2: Should we just adopt the state-of-the-art treatments from other fields? Is it
possible to build a better one by mixing and matching from those?
In Table 2, performance of the three state-of-the-art treatments are colored in red . On
Wahono datasets, Miwa’14 (PCTW) outperforms the other two treatments; while on Hall
dataset, Cormack’14 (HCTN) has the best performance; on Radjenović dataset, all three
treatments perform similarly; and on Kitchenham dataset, Wallace’10 (PUSA) outperforms
the others. Neither of the three state-of-the-art treatments consistently performs the best. This
means that adopting the state-of-the-art treatments will not produce best results. According
to Scott-Knott analysis, the performance of one treatment, HUTM (colored in green ),
consistently stays in the top rank across all four datasets. Further, this treatment dramatically
out-performs all three state-of-the-art treatments by requiring 20-50% fewer studies to be
reviewed to reach 95% recall. We call this treatment FASTREAD. It executes as follows:
1. Randomly sample from unlabeled candidate studies until 1 “relevant” example retrieved.
2. Then start training with weighting and query with uncertainty sampling, until 30 “relevant”
examples retrieved.
3. Then train with aggressive undersampling and query with certainty sampling until finished.
Hence, our answer to this research question is:
Finding 2
No, we should not just adopt the state-of-the-art methods from other fields. A better method
called FASTREAD is generated by mixing and matching from the state-of-the-art methods.
RQ3: How much effort can FASTREAD save in an SLR?
In terms of the number of studies reviewed, WSS@95 scores in Table 2 reflects how
much FASTREAD can save. Number of “relevant” studies (|R|) and the total number of
candidate studies (|C|) affect WSS@95 a lot, e.g. WSS@95=0.58 in Kitchenham dataset
with |R|=45, |C|=1704 and WSS@95=0.91 in Hall dataset with |R|=104, |C|=8911. Even
the smallest number of WSS@95=0.58 in Kitchenham dataset is a success in the reduction of
number of studies need to be reviewed comparing to the 5% recall lost.
The above performance metrics can be used for comparing the performance of different
algorithms. However, for a more realistic cost analysis, labeling/reviewing each study has
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
15
Table 3: How much can FASTREAD save?
Datasets
Wahono
Hall
Radjenović
Kitchenham
# Studies Reviewed
7002 − 670 = 6332
8991 − 350 = 8641
6000 − 680 = 5320
1704 − 630 = 1074
Review Cost
# Missing Relevant
≥ 6332CA + 4CD
4
≥ 8641CA + 6CD
6
≥ 5320CA + 3CD
3
32CD + 1074CA
3
Numbers of reviewing every candidate study minus numbers of reviewing with FASTREAD. For example,
on Kitchenham dataset, FASTREAD reviews 1074 fewer studies, which costs 32CD + 1074CA less review
effort, while misses 3 “relevant” ones. Here CD is the cost to review a study by its content and CA is the cost
to review a study by its title and abstract.
different costs. For each studies in L, its abstract and title has been reviewed, thus costs
CA . In addition, there exists a set LD ⊂ L, LR ⊂ LD where studies in LD have been
reviewed by their contents, thus cost an additional CD for each study. Table 3 shows how
much FASTREAD save over reviewing all candidate studies. Suppose CD = 9CA , following
the estimation that Shemilt made: 1 minute to screen a title-abstract record, 4 minutes to
retrieve a full-text study report, and 5 minutes to screen a full-text study report [53]. Then the
reduction in review cost is (32CD + 1074CA )/(132CD + 1704CA ) = 47.1%8 . On other
datasets, although we do not have the exact number of “abstract relevant” studies, we can
estimate the worst case review cost reduction9 with the numbers in Table 1 and Table 3:
a) Wahono dataset: 1 − 670(CA + CD )/((670 + 4)CD + 7002CA ) = 48.7%; b) Hall
dataset: 1 − 350(CA + CD )/((350 + 6)CD + 8991CA ) = 71.3%; c) Radjenović dataset:
1 − 680(CA + CD )/((680 + 3)CD + 6000CA ) = 44.0%. Note that training time costs
are negligibly small (1 second for each round in average) compared to the review time CA
because of the small training size (less than 1000 examples before reaching 95% recall).
Finding 3
Our results and estimations suggest that FASTREAD can save more than 40% of the effort
(associated with the primary selection study phase of a literature review) while retrieving
95% of the “relevant” studies.
7 Tool Support
In order to implement FASTREAD, we developed a simple tool as shown in Fig. 4. This
software is freely available from SeaCraft Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.837861
and its Github repository at https://github.com/fastread/src.
Using FASTREAD, a review starts with A: selecting the input candidate study list from
workspace/data/ directory. The input candidate list is specified in the format shown in Fig. 5a.
The input CSV file must have the Document Title, Abstract, Year, and PDF Link columns.
The label column, which is the true label of the candidate studies, is optional and is only used
8 According to Table 1, reviewing all studies costs 132C + 1704C . In our simulations, in average
D
A
FASTREAD did 630 abstract reviews and 100 content reviews.
9 In the worst case we assume that every study reviewed is “abstract relevant” and thus costs C + C to
D
A
review and there is no “abstract relevant” study left except for the 5% missing “content relevant” ones. E.g. in
Wahono dataset, FASTREAD reviews 670 studies among the 7002 candidate ones, it costs 670(CA + CD )
while reviewing all studies costs (670 + 4)CD + 7002CA .
16
Zhe Yu et al.
for testing. The output CSV file generated by the FASTREAD tool has an additional code
column, which is the reviewer-decided label for the candidate study. The final inclusion list
can be retrieved by extracting all the studies with “yes” in the code column.
As shown by the annotations in Fig. 4, reviews using FASTREAD proceeds as follows:
B Randomly select 10 candidate studies for review.
C Read through the title and abstract (and click on the title and read the full text if needed)
of the candidate study.
D Decide whether this study should be coded as Relevant or Irrelevant then click Submit.
E Click the Next button to save codes. 10 more candidates are then selected.
F The review status will change every time new studies are coded by reviewer and the Next
button is hit. The status is shown in the format “Documents Coded: Number of relevant
studies found / Number of studies reviewed (Total number of candidate studies).”
G1 Once 1 “relevant” study is coded, Random sampling moves to Uncertainty sampling.
G2 Once 30 “relevant” study is coded, Uncertainty sampling can change Certainty sampling.
H Fig. H can be plotted by clicking the Plot button or checking Auto Plot (figure cached in
src/static/image/ directory).
I Once finished, coded studies can be exported into a CSV file in the workspace/coded/
directory, in the format shown in Fig. 5b.
Note that the Restart button (J) is only for testing and discards all codes.
Fig. 4: Basic interface of the FASTREAD tool.
8 Discussion
8.1 What is missed?
Our results will show, with FASTREAD, 95% of the “relevant” studies can be retrieved by
reviewing a small portion (usually hundreds of studies) of long candidate study list. Given
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
(a) Input format
17
(b) Output format
Fig. 5: Data format for FASTREAD tool.
that, it is wise to reflect on the 5% of papers not found by such an analysis. To this end, we
took one of our case studies and reflected on:
– The set of papers R that a human analyst declared to be “relevant” (as listed in their
reference list at the end of their paper).
– The tangentially relevant subset of those papers R1 ⊆ R that a human analyst explicitly
mentions, however briefly, in the body of their paper.
– The yet smaller subset of those papers R2 ⊆ R1 that a human analyst discusses, at length,
in the body of their report (and for our purposes “at length” is “more that two lines”).
We call these insightful papers. Clearly, FASTREAD should not be recommended if our
method always misses the insightful papers.
For our case studies, on 30 repeats of our methods, we found that R2 \ LR = ∅; i.e. FASTREAD never missed an insightful paper. As for the tangentially relevant papers, FASTREAD
found all of those in 95% of the 30 repeats. Based on this analysis, we infer that missing
5% of the papers is not a major impediment to using FASTREAD. Similar conclusion was
derived by Shemilt et al. in 2016 [53]. More interestingly, we found that more than 90% of
the missing studies come from a same set of size of 0.1|R|. Which means some studies are
more likely to be missed while most studies have never been missed in 30 repeats. This may
suggest that there are outliers in relevant studies, which are not very important according to
our case studies.
That said, if the SLR conductor does not want to miss any potential relevant study, they
need to review all the candidate studies with full cost. We are actively exploring possibilities
to mitigate or compensate the missing studies issue. For example, one technique is “diversity
sampling”; i.e. to explore unknown regions by sampling the least similar studies from
what have been reviewed before. Exploration and exploitation can be balanced by selection
different weight between diversity sampling and certainty/uncertainty sampling Note that
more exploration means fewer missing studies but higher review cost.
8.2 What about domain knowledge?
In our simulations, we assume that no initial seed training set is available thus a random
sampling is performed to collect the minimum training set. This assumption represents the
worst case while no external knowledge is available. We show in this work that the absence
of that domain knowledge is not a critical failing of the approach. On the other hand, such
domain knowledge usually exists in real world SLRs and will boost the performance of
FASTREAD if wisely used. For example, if one relevant example and one irrelevant example
are known in the very beginning, the random sampling step of FASTREAD is no longer
needed and thus leads to additional cost reduction. More details about how to wisely use
domain knowledge to boost FASTREAD will be explored further after this work. While we
have some preliminary results in that area, we have nothing definitive to report at this time.
18
Zhe Yu et al.
8.3 What about real human reviewers?
In our simulations, we assume that there is only one reviewer who never make mistakes. In
real world SLRs, there will be multiple reviewers who make some mistakes.
To handle this, FASTREAD could be changed to one central learner with multiple review
agents. Every agent reviews different studies and feedback his or her decisions to the central
learner. The central learner then trains on the feedback of every agent and assigns studies to
each agent for review. Such schema will keep all the property of single reviewer FASTREAD
and performs similarly. In addition, there might be more intelligent way to allocate review
tasks based on the different performance of review agents [61].
Second, consider those multiple reviewers now make mistakes. Candidate studies need to
be reviewed by multiple reviewers in case any of them makes mistakes. To explore this issue,
appropriate data need to be collected on how human reviewers make mistakes. Wallace et
al. addressed this issue in 2015 [42] by analyzing the best policy for allocating review tasks
to reviewers with different experience levels as well as difference costs. We also plan to to
address this issue in our future work.
8.4 What about multiple categories of studies?
In our simulations, we assume that the target is binary classification. However, primary study
selection in real world SLRs might be a multi-label classification problem. For example, an
SLR with two research questions might go through a primary study selection while each
candidate is labeled as “relevant to RQ1”, “relevant to RQ2”, or “irrelevant” while the first
two labels can co-exist. The simplest solution for this is to run multiple FASTREAD learners
each learns on one label vs. others and each reviewer classify on one label only. In this case,
the multi-label classification problem can be divided into multiple FASTREAD problems.
Additional work such as ensemble learners can be explored in future works.
9 Threats to Validity
There are several validity threats to the design of this study [15]. Any conclusions made from
this work must be considered with the following issues in mind:
Conclusion validity focuses on the significance of the treatment. To enhance the conclusion validity of this work, we employed several statistical tests (Scott-Knott) to reduce the
changes of making spurious conclusions.
Internal validity measures how sure we can be that the treatment actually caused the
outcome. To enhance internal validity, we heavily constrained our experiments (see our
simulated results in strictly controlled environments as discussed in Section 5.4).
Construct validity focuses on the relation between the theory behind the experiment
and the observation. In this work, we evaluated our results via different treatments with
WSS@95 as stated in Section 5.1– note that those measures took us as close as we can to
computing cost reduction without “abstract relevant” information. That is, it fits the objective
of human-in-the-loop primary study selection as defined in the current literature [11, 12, 55].
Increasing the number of different measures may increase construct validity so, in future
work, we will further explore more metrics.
External validity concerns how well the conclusion can be applied outside. All the conclusions in this study are drawn from the experiments running on three software engineering SLR
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
19
datasets created with information from Hall, Wahono, Radjenović et al. studies [23, 48, 56]
and one dataset provided by Kitchenham [31]. Therefore, such conclusions may not be
applicable to datasets of different scenarios, e.g., citation screening from evidence based
medicine or TAR from e-discovery. Such bias threatens any classification experiment. The
best any researcher can do is to document that bias then make available to the general research community all the materials used in a study (with the hope that other researchers will
explore similar work on different datasets). Existing active learning techniques in citation
screening have been criticized by Olorisade et al. for being not replicable [43, 44]. To this
end, we have published all our code at https://github.com/fastread/src and all our data at
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1162952.
In the experiments, we assume that the human reviewer is always correct. In practice, this
assumption cannot hold and problems such as disagreement between reviewers or concept
drift (in which reviewers disagree with themselves as time passes) may occur. As discussed
below when we discuss Future Work, we intend to explore this matter in the near future.
The comparisons in our experiment are based on the controlled variables listed in Section 5.4. If those settings change, then the conclusion in Section 6 may become unreliable.
10 Conclusions
Systematic literature reviews are the primary method for aggregating evidence in evidencebased software engineering. It is suggested for every researcher in software engineering to
frequently conduct SLRs [29]. One drawback with such SLRs is the time required to complete
such a study: an SLR would can weeks to months to finish and the conclusion drawn can be
out of date in a few years.
To tackle this barrier to understanding the literature, this study focuses on primary study
selection, one of the most difficult and time consuming steps in an SLR. Machine learning
methods, especially active learning, are explored in our attempts to reduce the effort required
to exclude primary studies. In this paper:
– We explored 32 different active learners. To the best of our knowledge, this is largest
such study yet completed in the software engineering domain.
– We have collected data from four large literature reviews. This data is publically available
(doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1162952). Note that the creation and distribution of these data
sets is an important contribution, because prior to this study, it was difficult to obtain
even one such data set.
– We have offered a baseline result that can serve as a challenge problem for SE researchers:
how to find more relevant papers after reviewing fewer papers. We have placed in
the public domain (github.com/fastread/src) software tools that let others compare our
approach with alternative methods.
– We created a new reading-assistant tool called FASTREAD. To the best of our knowledge,
FASTREAD’s combination of methods has not been previously explored.
– Using FASTREAD, we decreased the number of studies to be reviewed by 20-50%
(comparing to the prior state-of-the-art).
As a result of the above we can:
– Offer much assistance to any future SLR.
– Offer a cautionary tale to SE researchers who use data miners. Specifically: do not be
content with off-the-shelf solutions developed by other communities. SE has nuanced
20
Zhe Yu et al.
differences to other domains so our methods need to be tuned to our data. Even within
the SE community there may be variations, so the framework provided by this paper is a
good example to find the best method for a specific task on specific data.
11 Future Work
This study has several limitations as described in Section 8. We consider the limitations as
open challenges and plan to address those in future work. Specific problems and plans for the
future are listed below.
– Conclusions are drawn from three synthetic SLR datasets and one Kitchenham dataset.
Validate the generalizability of the results on different datasets, including datasets from
evidence-based medicine and e-discovery.
– Experiment results are evaluated by WSS@95, which assumes a stop rule of reaching 95%
recall. How to stop at 95% recall without first knowing the number “relevant” studies in
the pool is an interesting topic. We are exploring this topic actively.
– The size and prevalence of data can affect performance of FASTREAD. With the capability
of cost reduction from FASTREAD, it is reasonable to ask whether we need the narrow
initial search. An interesting future research would be to use every paper on, say Scopus,
database as candidates and allow user to just using some simple search to initiate and
guide the selection. As a result, the recall is no longer restricted by the initial search
string thus may yield higher recall with reasonable cost.
– About 10% to 20% efforts are spent on random selection step and most of the variances
are also introduced in this step. To speed up the random selection step, external expert
knowledge will be introduced while unsupervised learning methods such as VTM, LDA,
word2vec, or t-SNE will also be considered in future work.
– Some magic parameters are arbitrarily chosen, which may affect the performance. However, parameter tuning is not a good fit for human-in-the-loop primary study selection
because a) parameters should be tuned for the data working on; b) but the effect of
applying different parameters can not be tested since querying extra label incurs extra
cost. Therefore, novel methods should be explored for parameter selection; e.g. better
criterion for when to switch from uncertainty sampling to certainty sampling (instead of
the “30” relevant examples rule applied now). Works from Borg [4] and Fu [21] will be
considered as candidate solutions to this problem.
– Current scenario is restricted to having only one reviewer, which is impractical in practice.
Problems including how to assign review tasks to multiple reviewers and how to utilize
reviewers with different cost and different capability will be explored in the future.
– Currently, we assume that reviewers never make mistakes. In future work, we will explore
concept drift (reviewers disagree with themselves, at some later time) and how to settle
disagreements (reviewers disagree with each other).
– This study focuses only on primary study selection. Assistance on other steps of SLR
such as searching, data extraction, and protocol development can also help reduce total
effort of SLRs. The potential of combining VTM, snowballing, and other tools with
FASTREAD needs to be explored as well.
We invite other researchers to join us in the exploring the above.
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
21
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Barbara Kitchenham for her attention to this work and for sharing with us
the “Kitchenham” dataset used in our experiments.
References
1. Adeva, J.G., Atxa, J.P., Carrillo, M.U., Zengotitabengoa, E.A.: Automatic text classification to support
systematic reviews in medicine. Expert Systems with Applications 41(4), 1498–1508 (2014)
2. Bezerra, Y.M., Pereira, T.A.B., da Silveira, G.E.: A systematic review of software product lines applied to
mobile middleware. In: Information Technology: New Generations, 2009. ITNG’09. Sixth International
Conference on, pp. 1024–1029. IEEE (2009)
3. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research
3(Jan), 993–1022 (2003)
4. Borg, M.: Tuner: a framework for tuning software engineering tools with handson instructions in r. Journal
of Software Evolution and Process 28(6), 427–459 (2016)
5. Bowes, D., Hall, T., Beecham, S.: Slurp: a tool to help large complex systematic literature reviews deliver
valid and rigorous results. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Evidential assessment of
software technologies, pp. 33–36. ACM (2012)
6. Carver, J.C., Hassler, E., Hernandes, E., Kraft, N.A.: Identifying barriers to the systematic literature
review process. In: 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and
Measurement, pp. 203–212. IEEE (2013)
7. Cohen, A.M.: An effective general purpose approach for automated biomedical document classification.
In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2006, p. 161. American Medical Informatics Association
(2006)
8. Cohen, A.M.: Performance of support-vector-machine-based classification on 15 systematic review topics
evaluated with the wss@ 95 measure. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18(1),
104–104 (2011)
9. Cohen, A.M., Ambert, K., McDonagh, M.: A prospective evaluation of an automated classification system
to support evidence-based medicine and systematic review. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings,
vol. 2010, p. 121. American Medical Informatics Association (2010)
10. Cohen, A.M., Hersh, W.R., Peterson, K., Yen, P.Y.: Reducing workload in systematic review preparation
using automated citation classification. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13(2),
206–219 (2006)
11. Cormack, G.V., Grossman, M.R.: Evaluation of machine-learning protocols for technology-assisted review
in electronic discovery. In: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research &
development in information retrieval, pp. 153–162. ACM (2014)
12. Cormack, G.V., Grossman, M.R.: Autonomy and reliability of continuous active learning for technologyassisted review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.06868 (2015)
13. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Machine learning 20(3), 273–297 (1995)
14. Dyba, T., Kitchenham, B.A., Jorgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. IEEE
Software 22(1), 58–65 (2005). DOI 10.1109/MS.2005.6
15. Feldt, R., Magazinius, A.: Validity threats in empirical software engineering research-an initial survey. In:
SEKE, pp. 374–379 (2010)
16. Felizardo, K.R., Andery, G.F., Paulovich, F.V., Minghim, R., Maldonado, J.C.: A visual analysis approach
to validate the selection review of primary studies in systematic reviews. Information and Software
Technology 54(10), 1079–1091 (2012)
17. Felizardo, K.R., Mendes, E., Kalinowski, M., Souza, É.F., Vijaykumar, N.L.: Using forward snowballing
to update systematic reviews in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International
Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, p. 53. ACM (2016)
18. Felizardo, K.R., Nakagawa, E.Y., Feitosa, D., Minghim, R., Maldonado, J.C.: An approach based on
visual text mining to support categorization and classification in the systematic mapping. In: Proc. of
EASE, vol. 10, pp. 1–10 (2010)
19. Felizardo, K.R., Nakagawa, E.Y., MacDonell, S.G., Maldonado, J.C.: A visual analysis approach to
update systematic reviews. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and
Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE ’14, pp. 4:1–4:10. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014).
DOI 10.1145/2601248.2601252
20. Fernández-Sáez, A.M., Bocco, M.G., Romero, F.P.: SLR-Tool: A tool for performing systematic literature
reviews. In: ICSOFT (2), pp. 157–166 (2010)
22
Zhe Yu et al.
21. Fu, W., Menzies, T., Shen, X.: Tuning for software analytics: Is it really necessary? Information and
Software Technology 76, 135–146 (2016)
22. Grossman, M.R., Cormack, G.V.: The grossman-cormack glossary of technology-assisted review with
foreword by john m. facciola, u.s. magistrate judge. Federal Courts Law Review 7(1), 1–34 (2013)
23. Hall, T., Beecham, S., Bowes, D., Gray, D., Counsell, S.: A systematic literature review on fault prediction
performance in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 38(6), 1276–1304
(2012)
24. Hassler, E., Carver, J.C., Hale, D., Al-Zubidy, A.: Identification of SLR tool needs — results of a
community workshop. Information and Software Technology 70, 122–129 (2016)
25. Hassler, E., Carver, J.C., Kraft, N.A., Hale, D.: Outcomes of a community workshop to identify and rank
barriers to the systematic literature review process. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference
on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, p. 31. ACM (2014)
26. Hernandes, E., Zamboni, A., Fabbri, S., Thommazo, A.D.: Using gqm and tam to evaluate start-a tool that
supports systematic review. CLEI Electronic Journal 15(1), 3–3 (2012)
27. Jalali, S., Wohlin, C.: Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. In: Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement,
pp. 29–38. ACM (2012)
28. Joachims, T.: Training linear svms in linear time. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international
conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 217–226. ACM (2006)
29. Keele, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In: Technical
report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE (2007)
30. Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P.: A systematic review of systematic review process research in software
engineering. Information and software technology 55(12), 2049–2075 (2013)
31. Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O.P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S.: Systematic
literature reviews in software engineering–a tertiary study. Information and Software Technology 52(8),
792–805 (2010)
32. Kitchenham, B.A., Dyba, T., Jorgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering. In: Proceedings of the
26th international conference on software engineering, pp. 273–281. IEEE Computer Society (2004)
33. Krishna, R., Yu, Z., Agrawal, A., Dominguez, M., Wolf, D.: The bigse project: lessons learned from
validating industrial text mining. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on BIG Data Software
Engineering, pp. 65–71. ACM (2016)
34. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the 31st
International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), pp. 1188–1196 (2014)
35. Liu, J., Timsina, P., El-Gayar, O.: A comparative analysis of semi-supervised learning: The case of
article selection for medical systematic reviews. Information Systems Frontiers (2016). DOI 10.1007/
s10796-016-9724-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9724-0
36. Malheiros, V., Hohn, E., Pinho, R., Mendonca, M., Maldonado, J.C.: A visual text mining approach
for systematic reviews. In: First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and
Measurement (ESEM 2007), pp. 245–254. IEEE (2007)
37. Marshall, C., Brereton, P.: Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A
mapping study. In: 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and
Measurement, pp. 296–299. IEEE (2013)
38. Marshall, C., Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.: Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering:
A feature analysis. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in
Software Engineering, EASE ’14, pp. 13:1–13:10. ACM (2014)
39. Marshall, C., Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.: Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering:
A cross-domain survey using semi-structured interviews. In: Proceedings of the 19th International
Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, p. 26. ACM (2015)
40. Miwa, M., Thomas, J., OMara-Eves, A., Ananiadou, S.: Reducing systematic review workload through
certainty-based screening. Journal of biomedical informatics 51, 242–253 (2014)
41. Molléri, J.S., Benitti, F.B.V.: Sesra: A web-based automated tool to support the systematic literature
review process. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in
Software Engineering, EASE ’15, pp. 24:1–24:6. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2015). DOI 10.1145/
2745802.2745825
42. Nguyen, A.T., Wallace, B.C., Lease, M.: Combining crowd and expert labels using decision theoretic
active learning. In: Third AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (2015)
43. Olorisade, B.K., Brereton, P., Andras, P.: Reproducibility of studies on text mining for citation screening
in systematic reviews: Evaluation and checklist. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 73, 1 (2017)
44. Olorisade, B.K., de Quincey, E., Brereton, P., Andras, P.: A critical analysis of studies that address the
use of text mining for citation screening in systematic reviews. In: Proceedings of the 20th International
Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, p. 14. ACM (2016)
Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
23
45. Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., Elmagarmid, A.: Rayyan—a web and mobile app for
systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews 5(1), 210 (2016). DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
46. OMara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., Ananiadou, S.: Using text mining for study
identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Systematic reviews 4(1),
5 (2015)
47. Paynter, R., Bañez, L.L., Berliner, E., Erinoff, E., Lege-Matsuura, J., Potter, S., Uhl, S.: Epc methods: an
exploration of the use of text-mining software in systematic reviews. Research white paper (prepared by the
Scientific Resource Center and the Vanderbilt and ECRI Evidence-based Practice Centers under contract
nos. HHSA290201200004C (SRC), HHSA290201200009I (Vanderbilt), and HHSA290201200011I
(ECRI). (2016). URL http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final/
cfm
48. Radjenović, D., Heričko, M., Torkar, R., Živkovič, A.: Software fault prediction metrics: A systematic
literature review. Information and Software Technology 55(8), 1397–1418 (2013)
49. Roegiest, A., Cormack, G.V., Grossman, M., Clarke, C.: Trec 2015 total recall track overview. Proc.
TREC-2015 (2015)
50. Ros, R., Bjarnason, E., Runeson, P.: A machine learning approach for semi-automated search and selection
in literature studies. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment
in Software Engineering, pp. 118–127. ACM (2017)
51. Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey. University of Wisconsin, Madison 52(55-66), 11 (2010)
52. Settles, B.: Active learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 6(1),
1–114 (2012)
53. Shemilt, I., Khan, N., Park, S., Thomas, J.: Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of
study identification methods in systematic reviews. Systematic reviews 5(1), 140 (2016)
54. Thomas, J., Brunton, J., Graziosi, S.: Eppi-reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis (2010). URL
http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/CMS/Default.aspx?alias=eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/er4
55. Tredennick, J.: TAR for Smart People. Catalyst (2015)
56. Wahono, R.S.: A systematic literature review of software defect prediction: research trends, datasets,
methods and frameworks. Journal of Software Engineering 1(1), 1–16 (2015)
57. Wallace, B.C., Dahabreh, I.J., Moran, K.H., Brodley, C.E., Trikalinos, T.A.: Active literature discovery for
scoping evidence reviews: How many needles are there. In: KDD workshop on data mining for healthcare
(KDD-DMH) (2013)
58. Wallace, B.C., Dahabreh, I.J., Schmid, C.H., Lau, J., Trikalinos, T.A.: Modernizing the systematic review
process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods. Journal of comparative effectiveness
research 2(3), 273–282 (2013)
59. Wallace, B.C., Small, K., Brodley, C.E., Lau, J., Trikalinos, T.A.: Deploying an interactive machine
learning system in an evidence-based practice center: abstrackr. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT
International Health Informatics Symposium, pp. 819–824. ACM (2012)
60. Wallace, B.C., Small, K., Brodley, C.E., Trikalinos, T.A.: Active learning for biomedical citation screening.
In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data
mining, pp. 173–182. ACM (2010)
61. Wallace, B.C., Small, K., Brodley, C.E., Trikalinos, T.A.: Who should label what? instance allocation in
multiple expert active learning. In: SDM, pp. 176–187. SIAM (2011)
62. Wallace, B.C., Trikalinos, T.A., Lau, J., Brodley, C., Schmid, C.H.: Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC bioinformatics 11(1), 1 (2010)
63. Wohlin, C.: Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software
engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in
software engineering, p. 38. ACM (2014)
64. Wohlin, C.: Second-generation systematic literature studies using snowballing. In: Proceedings of the
20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, p. 15. ACM (2016)
65. Zhang, H., Babar, M.A., Bai, X., Li, J., Huang, L.: An empirical assessment of a systematic search process
for systematic reviews. In: Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2011), 15th Annual
Conference on, pp. 56–65. IET (2011)
66. Zhang, H., Babar, M.A., Tell, P.: Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. Information and
Software Technology 53(6), 625–637 (2011)
| 2cs.AI
|
Mining Supervisor Evaluation and Peer
Feedback in Performance Appraisals
arXiv:1712.00991v1 [cs.CL] 4 Dec 2017
Girish Keshav Palshikar, Sachin Pawar, Saheb Chourasia, Nitin Ramrakhiyani
TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services Limited,
54B Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune 411013, India.
{gk.palshikar, sachin7.p, saheb.c, nitin.ramrakhiyani}@tcs.com
Abstract. Performance appraisal (PA) is an important HR process to
periodically measure and evaluate every employee’s performance vis-avis the goals established by the organization. A PA process involves purposeful multi-step multi-modal communication between employees, their
supervisors and their peers, such as self-appraisal, supervisor assessment
and peer feedback. Analysis of the structured data and text produced
in PA is crucial for measuring the quality of appraisals and tracking
actual improvements. In this paper, we apply text mining techniques
to produce insights from PA text. First, we perform sentence classification to identify strengths, weaknesses and suggestions of improvements
found in the supervisor assessments and then use clustering to discover
broad categories among them. Next we use multi-class multi-label classification techniques to match supervisor assessments to predefined broad
perspectives on performance. Finally, we propose a short-text summarization technique to produce a summary of peer feedback comments
for a given employee and compare it with manual summaries. All techniques are illustrated using a real-life dataset of supervisor assessment
and peer feedback text produced during the PA of 4528 employees in a
large multi-national IT company.
1
Introduction
Performance appraisal (PA) is an important HR process, particularly for modern
organizations that crucially depend on the skills and expertise of their workforce.
The PA process enables an organization to periodically measure and evaluate
every employee’s performance. It also provides a mechanism to link the goals
established by the organization to its each employee’s day-to-day activities and
performance. Design and analysis of PA processes is a lively area of research
within the HR community [13], [22], [10], [20].
The PA process in any modern organization is nowadays implemented and
tracked through an IT system (the PA system) that records the interactions
that happen in various steps. Availability of this data in a computer-readable
database opens up opportunities to analyze it using automated statistical, datamining and text-mining techniques, to generate novel and actionable insights /
patterns and to help in improving the quality and effectiveness of the PA process [15], [19], [1]. Automated analysis of large-scale PA data is now facilitated
2
by technological and algorithmic advances, and is becoming essential for large
organizations containing thousands of geographically distributed employees handling a wide variety of roles and tasks.
A typical PA process involves purposeful multi-step multi-modal communication between employees, their supervisors and their peers. In most PA processes,
the communication includes the following steps: (i) in self-appraisal, an employee
records his/her achievements, activities, tasks handled etc.; (ii) in supervisor assessment, the supervisor provides the criticism, evaluation and suggestions for
improvement of performance etc.; and (iii) in peer feedback (aka 360◦ view), the
peers of the employee provide their feedback. There are several business questions that managers are interested in. Examples:
1. For my workforce, what are the broad categories of strengths, weaknesses
and suggestions of improvements found in the supervisor assessments?
2. For my workforce, how many supervisor comments are present for each of
a given fixed set of perspectives (which we call attributes), such as FUNCTIONAL EXCELLENCE, CUSTOMER FOCUS, BUILDING EFFECTIVE TEAMS
etc.?
3. What is the summary of the peer feedback for a given employee?
In this paper, we develop text mining techniques that can automatically produce
answers to these questions. Since the intended users are HR executives, ideally,
the techniques should work with minimum training data and experimentation
with parameter setting. These techniques have been implemented and are being
used in a PA system in a large multi-national IT company.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 summarizes related
work. Section 3 summarizes the PA dataset used in this paper. Section 4 applies sentence classification algorithms to automatically discover three important classes of sentences in the PA corpus viz., sentences that discuss strengths,
weaknesses of employees and contain suggestions for improving her performance.
Section 5 considers the problem of mapping the actual targets mentioned in
strengths, weaknesses and suggestions to a fixed set of attributes. In Section 6,
we discuss how the feedback from peers for a particular employee can be summarized. In Section 7 we draw conclusions and identify some further work.
2
Related Work
We first review some work related to sentence classification. Semantically classifying sentences (based on the sentence’s purpose) is a much harder task, and is
gaining increasing attention from linguists and NLP researchers. McKnight and
Srinivasan [12] and Yamamoto and Takagi [23] used SVM to classify sentences in
biomedical abstracts into classes such as INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, PURPOSE, METHOD, RESULT, CONCLUSION. Cohen et al. [3] applied SVM and other
techniques to learn classifiers for sentences in emails into classes, which are speech
acts defined by a verb-noun pair, with verbs such as request, propose, amend,
commit, deliver and nouns such as meeting, document, committee; see also [2].
3
Khoo et al. [9] uses various classifiers to classify sentences in emails into classes
such as APOLOGY, INSTRUCTION, QUESTION, REQUEST, SALUTATION, STATEMENT, SUGGESTION, THANKING etc. Qadir and Riloff [17] proposes several filters
and classifiers to classify sentences on message boards (community QA systems)
into 4 speech acts: COMMISSIVE (speaker commits to a future action), DIRECTIVE
(speaker expects listener to take some action), EXPRESSIVE (speaker expresses
his or her psychological state to the listener), REPRESENTATIVE (represents the
speaker’s belief of something). Hachey and Grover [7] used SVM and maximum
entropy classifiers to classify sentences in legal documents into classes such as
FACT, PROCEEDINGS, BACKGROUND, FRAMING, DISPOSAL; see also [18]. Deshpande et al. [5] proposes unsupervised linguistic patterns to classify sentences
into classes SUGGESTION, COMPLAINT.
There is much work on a closely related problem viz., classifying sentences in
dialogues through dialogue-specific categories called dialogue acts [21], which
we will not review here. Just as one example, Cotterill [4] classifies questions in emails into the dialogue acts of YES NO QUESTION, WH QUESTION,
ACTION REQUEST, RHETORICAL, MULTIPLE CHOICE etc.
We could not find much work related to mining of performance appraisals
data. Pawar et al. [16] uses kernel-based classification to classify sentences in both
performance appraisal text and product reviews into classes SUGGESTION, APPRECIATION, COMPLAINT. Apte et al. [1] provides two algorithms for matching
the descriptions of goals or tasks assigned to employees to a standard template
of model goals. One algorithm is based on the co-training framework and uses
goal descriptions and self-appraisal comments as two separate perspectives. The
second approach uses semantic similarity under a weak supervision framework.
Ramrakhiyani et al. [19] proposes label propagation algorithms to discover aspects in supervisor assessments in performance appraisals, where an aspect is
modelled as a verb-noun pair (e.g. conduct training, improve coding).
3
Dataset
In this paper, we used the supervisor assessment and peer feedback text produced
during the performance appraisal of 4528 employees in a large multi-national IT
company. The corpus of supervisor assessment has 26972 sentences. The summary statistics about the number of words in a sentence is: min:4 max:217 average:15.5 STDEV:9.2 Q1:9 Q2:14 Q3:19.
4
Sentence Classification
The PA corpus contains several classes of sentences that are of interest. In this
paper, we focus on three important classes of sentences viz., sentences that
discuss strengths (class STRENGTH), weaknesses of employees (class WEAKNESS) and suggestions for improving her performance (class SUGGESTION).
The strengths or weaknesses are mostly about the performance in work carried
out, but sometimes they can be about the working style or other personal
4
qualities. The classes WEAKNESS and SUGGESTION are somewhat overlapping;
e.g., a suggestion may address a perceived weakness. Following are two example
sentences in each class.
STRENGTH:
– Excellent technology leadership and delivery capabilities along with
ability to groom technology champions within the team.
– He can drive team to achieve results and can take pressure.
WEAKNESS:
– Sometimes exhibits the quality that he knows more than the others in
the room which puts off others.
– Tends to stretch himself and team a bit too hard.
SUGGESTION:
– X has to attune himself to the vision of the business unit and its
goals a little more than what is being currently exhibited.
– Need to improve on business development skills, articulation of
business and solution benefits.
Several linguistic aspects of these classes of sentences are apparent. The subject is implicit in many sentences. The strengths are often mentioned as either
noun phrases (NP) with positive adjectives (Excellent technology leadership)
or positive nouns (engineering strength) or through verbs with positive polarity (dedicated) or as verb phrases containing positive adjectives (delivers
innovative solutions). Similarly for weaknesses, where negation is more frequently used (presentations are not his forte), or alternatively, the polarities
of verbs (avoid) or adjectives (poor) tend to be negative. However, sometimes
the form of both the strengths and weaknesses is the same, typically a standalone sentiment-neutral NP, making it difficult to distinguish between them; e.g.,
adherence to timing or timely closure. Suggestions often have an imperative
mood and contain secondary verbs such as need to, should, has to. Suggestions are sometimes expressed using comparatives (better process compliance).
We built a simple set of patterns for each of the 3 classes on the POS-tagged
form of the sentences. We use each set of these patterns as an unsupervised
sentence classifier for that class. If a particular sentence matched with patterns
for multiple classes, then we have simple tie-breaking rules for picking the final
class. The pattern for the STRENGTH class looks for the presence of positive
words / phrases like takes ownership, excellent, hard working, commitment, etc.
Similarly, the pattern for the WEAKNESS class looks for the presence of negative
words / phrases like lacking, diffident, slow learner, less focused, etc. The
SUGGESTION pattern not only looks for keywords like should, needs to but also
for POS based pattern like “a verb in the base form (VB) in the beginning of a
sentence”.
5
We randomly selected 2000 sentences from the supervisor assessment corpus and manually tagged them (dataset D1). This labelled dataset contained
705, 103, 822 and 370 sentences having the class labels STRENGTH, WEAKNESS,
SUGGESTION or OTHER respectively. We trained several multi-class classifiers
on this dataset. Table 1 shows the results of 5-fold cross-validation experiments
on dataset D1. For the first 5 classifiers, we used their implementation from the
SciKit Learn library in Python (scikit-learn.org). The features used for these
classifiers were simply the sentence words along with their frequencies. For the
last 2 classifiers (in Table 1), we used our own implementation. The overall accupredictions
, where the denominator
racy for a classifier is defined as A = #correct
#data points
is 2000 for dataset D1. Note that the pattern-based approach is unsupervised
i.e., it did not use any training data. Hence, the results shown for it are for the
entire dataset and not based on cross-validation.
Table 1. Results of 5-fold cross validation for sentence classification on dataset D1.
Classifier
Logistic Regression
Multinomial Naive Bayes
Random Forest
AdaBoost
Linear SVM
SVM with ADWSK [16]
Pattern-based
4.1
STRENGTH
P
R
F
0.715
0.719
0.681
0.522
0.718
0.789
0.825
0.759
0.723
0.688
0.888
0.698
0.847
0.687
0.736
0.721
0.685
0.657
0.708
0.817
0.749
WEAKNESS
P
R
F
0.309
0.246
0.286
0.265
0.357
0.491
0.976
0.204
0.155
0.039
0.087
0.194
0.262
0.494
0.246
0.190
0.068
0.131
0.252
0.342
0.656
SUGGESTION
P
R
F
0.788
0.672
0.730
0.825
0.744
0.844
0.835
0.749
0.790
0.734
0.618
0.759
0.871
0.828
0.768
0.723
0.732
0.707
0.751
0.857
0.832
A
0.674
0.646
0.638
0.604
0.651
0.771
0.698
Comparison with Sentiment Analyzer
We also explored whether a sentiment analyzer can be used as a baseline for
identifying the class labels STRENGTH and WEAKNESS. We used an implementation of sentiment analyzer from TextBlob1 to get a polarity score for each
sentence. Table 2 shows the distribution of positive, negative and neutral sentiments across the 3 class labels STRENGTH, WEAKNESS and SUGGESTION. It
can be observed that distribution of positive and negative sentiments is almost
similar in STRENGTH as well as SUGGESTION sentences, hence we can conclude
that the information about sentiments is not much useful for our classification
problem.
4.2
Discovering Clusters within Sentence Classes
After identifying sentences in each class, we can now answer question (1) in
Section 1. From 12742 sentences predicted to have label STRENGTH, we extract
1
https://textblob.readthedocs.io/en/dev/
6
Table 2. Results of TextBlob sentiment analyzer on the dataset D1
Sentence Class Positive Negative Neutral
STRENGTH
544
44
117
WEAKNESS
44
24
35
SUGGESTION
430
52
340
Table 3. 5 representative clusters in strengths.
Strength cluster
Count
motivation expertise knowledge talent skill
1851
coaching team coach
1787
professional career job work working training practice
1531
opportunity focus attention success future potential impact result change 1431
sales retail company business industry marketing product
1251
nouns that indicate the actual strength, and cluster them using a simple clustering algorithm which uses the cosine similarity between word embeddings2 of
these nouns. We repeat this for the 9160 sentences with predicted label WEAKNESS or SUGGESTION as a single class. Tables 3 and 4 show a few representative clusters in strengths and in weaknesses, respectively. We also explored
clustering 12742 STRENGTH sentences directly using CLUTO [8] and Carrot2
Lingo [14] clustering algorithms. Carrot2 Lingo3 discovered 167 clusters and also
assigned labels to these clusters. We then generated 167 clusters using CLUTO
as well. CLUTO does not generate cluster labels automatically, hence we used
5 most frequent words within the cluster as its labels. Table 5 shows the largest
5 clusters by both the algorithms. It was observed that the clusters created by
CLUTO were more meaningful and informative as compared to those by Carrot2
Lingo. Also, it was observed that there is some correspondence between noun
clusters and sentence clusters. E.g. the nouns cluster motivation expertise
knowledge talent skill (Table 3) corresponds to the CLUTO sentence cluster skill customer management knowledge team (Table 5). But overall, users
found the nouns clusters to be more meaningful than the sentence clusters.
2
3
We used 100 dimensional word vectors trained on Wikipedia 2014 and Gigaword 5
corpus, available at: https://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/glove/
We used the default parameter settings for Carrot2 Lingo algorithm as mentioned
at: http://download.carrot2.org/head/manual/index.html
Table 4. 5 representative clusters in weaknesses and suggestions.
Weakness cluster
Count
motivation expertise knowledge talent skill
1308
market sales retail corporate marketing commercial industry business 1165
awareness emphasis focus
1165
coaching team coach
1149
job work working task planning
1074
7
Table 5. Largest 5 sentence clusters within 12742 STRENGTH sentences
Algorithm Cluster
#Sentences
performance performer perform years team
510
skill customer management knowledge team
325
CLUTO role delivery work place show
289
delivery manage management manager customer
259
knowledge customer business experience work
250
manager manage
1824
team team
1756
Carrot2 delivery management
451
manage team
376
customer management
321
5
PA along Attributes
In many organizations, PA is done from a predefined set of perspectives, which we
call attributes. Each attribute covers one specific aspect of the work done by the
employees. This has the advantage that we can easily compare the performance
of any two employees (or groups of employees) along any given attribute. We
can correlate various performance attributes and find dependencies among them.
We can also cluster employees in the workforce using their supervisor ratings
for each attribute to discover interesting insights into the workforce. The HR
managers in the organization considered in this paper have defined 15 attributes
(Table 6). Each attribute is essentially a work item or work category described
at an abstract level. For example, FUNCTIONAL EXCELLENCE covers any tasks,
goals or activities related to the software engineering life-cycle (e.g., requirements
analysis, design, coding, testing etc.) as well as technologies such as databases,
web services and GUI.
In the example in Section 4, the first sentence (which has class STRENGTH)
can be mapped to two attributes: FUNCTIONAL EXCELLENCE and BUILDING EFFECTIVE TEAMS. Similarly, the third sentence (which has class WEAKNESS) can be mapped to the attribute INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS and so
forth. Thus, in order to answer the second question in Section 1, we need to map
each sentence in each of the 3 classes to zero, one, two or more attributes, which
is a multi-class multi-label classification problem.
We manually tagged the same 2000 sentences in Dataset D1 with attributes,
where each sentence may get 0, 1, 2, etc. up to 15 class labels (this is dataset D2).
This labelled dataset contained 749, 206, 289, 207, 91, 223, 191, 144, 103, 80,
82, 42, 29, 15, 24 sentences having the class labels listed in Table 6 in the same
order. The number of sentences having 0, 1, 2, or more than 2 attributes are:
321, 1070, 470 and 139 respectively. We trained several multi-class multi-label
classifiers on this dataset. Table 7 shows the results of 5-fold cross-validation
experiments on dataset D2.
Precision, Recall and F-measure for this multi-label classification are computed using a strategy similar to the one described in [6]. Let Pi be the set of
8
Table 6. Strengths, Weaknesses and Suggestions along Performance Attributes
Performance Attributes
#Strengths #Weaknesses #Suggestions
FUNCTIONAL EXCELLENCE
321
26
284
BUILDING EFFECTIVE TEAMS
80
6
89
INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS
151
16
97
CUSTOMER FOCUS
100
5
76
INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
22
4
53
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
53
17
124
BUSINESS ACUMEN
39
10
103
TAKING OWNERSHIP
47
3
81
PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT
31
8
57
DRIVE FOR RESULTS
37
4
30
STRATEGIC CAPABILITY
8
4
51
WITHSTANDING PRESSURE
16
6
16
DEALING WITH AMBIGUITIES
4
8
12
MANAGING VISION AND PURPOSE
3
0
9
TIMELY DECISION MAKING
6
2
10
Table 7. Results of 5-fold cross validation for multi-class multi-label classification on
dataset D2.
Classifier
Precision P Recall R
Logistic Regression
0.715
0.711
Multinomial Naive Bayes
0.664
0.588
Random Forest
0.837
0.441
AdaBoost
0.794
0.595
Linear SVM
0.722
0.672
Pattern-based
0.750
0.679
F
0.713
0.624
0.578
0.680
0.696
0.713
predicted labels and Ai be the set of actual labels for the ith instance. Precision
and recall for this instance are computed as follows:
P recisioni =
|Pi ∩ Ai |
|Pi ∩ Ai |
, Recalli =
|Pi |
|Ai |
It can be observed that P recisioni would be undefined if Pi is empty and similarly Recalli would be undefined when Ai is empty. Hence, overall precision and
recall are computed by averaging over all the instances except where they are
undefined. Instance-level F-measure can not be computed for instances where either precision or recall are undefined. Therefore, overall F-measure is computed
using the overall precision and recall.
6
Summarization of Peer Feedback using ILP
The PA system includes a set of peer feedback comments for each employee. To
answer the third question in Section 1, we need to create a summary of all the
9
peer feedback comments about a given employee. As an example, following are
the feedback comments from 5 peers of an employee.
1. vast knowledge on different technologies
2. His experience and wast knowledge mixed with his positive attitude,
willingness to teach and listen and his humble nature.
3. Approachable, Knowlegeable and is of helping nature.
4. Dedication, Technical expertise and always supportive
5. Effective communication and team player
The individual sentences in the comments written by each peer are first
identified and then POS tags are assigned to each sentence. We hypothesize that
a good summary of these multiple comments can be constructed by identifying
a set of important text fragments or phrases. Initially, a set of candidate phrases
is extracted from these comments and a subset of these candidate phrases is
chosen as the final summary, using Integer Linear Programming (ILP). The
details of the ILP formulation are shown in Table 8. As an example, following is
the summary generated for the above 5 peer comments.
humble nature, effective communication, technical expertise, always
supportive, vast knowledge
Following rules are used to identify candidate phrases:
– An adjective followed by in which is followed by a noun phrase (e.g. good
in customer relationship)
– A verb followed by a noun phrase (e.g. maintains work life balance)
– A verb followed by a preposition which is followed by a noun phrase (e.g.
engage in discussion)
– Only a noun phrase (e.g. excellent listener)
– Only an adjective (e.g. supportive)
Various parameters are used to evaluate a candidate phrase for its importance.
A candidate phrase is more important:
– if it contains an adjective or a verb or its headword is a noun having WordNet
lexical category noun.attribute (e.g. nouns such as dedication, sincerity)
– if it contains more number of words
– if it is included in comments of multiple peers
– if it represents any of the performance attributes such as Innovation, Customer, Strategy etc.
A complete list of parameters is described in detail in Table 8.
There is a trivial constraint C0 which makes sure that only K out of N candidate phrases are chosen. A suitable value of K is used for each employee depending on number of candidate phrases identified across all peers (see Algorithm 1).
Another set of constraints (C1 to C10 ) make sure that at least one phrase is
selected for each of the leadership attributes. The constraint C11 makes sure
that multiple phrases sharing the same headword are not chosen at a time. Also,
10
single word candidate phrases are chosen only if they are adjectives or nouns
with lexical category noun.attribute. This is imposed by the constraint C12 . It
is important to note that all the constraints except C0 are soft constraints, i.e.
there may be feasible solutions which do not satisfy some of these constraints.
But each constraint which is not satisfied, results in a penalty through the use
of slack variables. These constraints are described in detail in Table 8.
The objective function maximizes the total importance score of the selected
candidate phrases. At the same time, it also minimizes the sum of all slack
variables so that the minimum number of constraints are broken.
Data: N : No. of candidate phrases
Result: K: No. of phrases to select as part of summary
if N ≤ 10 then
K ← ⌊N ∗ 0.5⌋;
else if N ≤ 20 then
K ← ⌊ getN oOf P hrasesT oSelect(10) + (N − 10) ∗ 0.4⌋;
else if N ≤ 30 then
K ← ⌊ getN oOf P hrasesT oSelect(20) + (N − 20) ∗ 0.3⌋;
else if N ≤ 50 then
K ← ⌊ getN oOf P hrasesT oSelect(30) + (N − 30) ∗ 0.2⌋;
else
K ← ⌊ getN oOf P hrasesT oSelect(50) + (N − 50) ∗ 0.1⌋;
end
if K < 4 and N ≥ 4 then
K←4
else if K < 4 then
K←N
else if K > 20 then
K ← 20
end
Algorithm 1: getN oOf P hrasesT oSelect (For determining number of phrases
to select to include in summary)
6.1
Evaluation of auto-generated summaries
We considered a dataset of 100 employees, where for each employee multiple
peer comments were recorded. Also, for each employee, a manual summary was
generated by an HR personnel. The summaries generated by our ILP-based
approach were compared with the corresponding manual summaries using the
ROUGE [11] unigram score. For comparing performance of our ILP-based summarization algorithm, we explored a few summarization algorithms provided
by the Sumy package4. A common parameter which is required by all these
4
https://github.com/miso-belica/sumy
11
Table 8. Integer Linear Program (ILP) formulation
Parameters:
N : No. of phrases
K: No. of phrases to be chosen for inclusion in the final summary
F req: Array of size N , F reqi = no. of distinct peers mentioning the ith phrase
Adj: Array of size N , Adji = 1 if the ith phrase contains any adjective
V erb: Array of size N , V erbi = 1 if the ith phrase contains any verb
N umW ords: Array of size N , N umW ordsi = 1 no. of words in the ith phrase
N ounCat: Array of size N , N ounCati = 1 if lexical category (WordNet) of
headword of the ith phrase is noun.attribute
– InvalidSingleN oun: Array of size N , InvalidSingleN ouni = 1 if the ith
phrase is single word phrase which is neither an adjective nor a noun having
lexical category (WordNet) noun.attribute
– Leadership, T eam, Innovation, Communication, Knowledge, Delivery,
Ownership, Customer, Strategy, P ersonal: Indicator arrays of size N each,
representing whether any phrase corresponds to a particular performance
attribute, e.g. Customeri = 1 indicates that ith phrase is of type Customer
– S: Matrix of dimensions N × N , where Sij = 1 if headwords of ith and j th
phrase are same
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Variables:
– X: Array of N binary variables, where Xi = 1 only when ith phrase is chosen
to be the part of final summary
– S1 , S2 , · · · S12 : Integer slack variables
Objective:
P
Maximize N
ounCati + Adji + V erbi + 1) · F reqi · N umW ordsi · Xi )
i=1 ((NP
−10000 · 12
j=1 Sj
Constraints:
P
C0 : N
i=1 Xi = K (Exactly K phrases should be chosen)
P
C1 : N
(Leadershipi · Xi ) + S1 ≥ 1
Pi=1
C2 : N
(T eami · Xi ) + S2 ≥ 1
i=1
P
C3 : N
(Knowledgei · Xi ) + S3 ≥ 1
i=1
P
C4 : N
(Deliveryi · Xi ) + S4 ≥ 1
Pi=1
C5 : N
(Ownershipi · Xi ) + S5 ≥ 1
Pi=1
C6 : N
(Innovationi · Xi ) + S6 ≥ 1
Pi=1
C7 : N
(Communicationi · Xi ) + S7 ≥ 1
Pi=1
C8 : N
(Customeri · Xi ) + S8 ≥ 1
Pi=1
C9 : N
(Strategyi · Xi ) + S9 ≥ 1
Pi=1
C10 : N
i=1 (P ersonali · Xi ) + S1 0 ≥ 1
(At least one phrase should be chosen to represent each leadership attribute)
P
PN
C11 : N
i=1
j=1,s.t.i6=j (Sij · (Xi + Xj − 1)) + S11 <= 0
(No duplicate phrases should be chosen)
P
C12 : N
i=1 (InvalidSingleN ouni · Xi ) − S12 <= 0
(Single word noun phrases are not preferred if they are not noun.attribute)
12
algorithms is number of sentences keep in the final summary. ILP-based summarization requires a similar parameter K, which is automatically decided based on
number of total candidate phrases. Assuming a sentence is equivalent to roughly
3 phrases, for Sumy algorithms, we set number of sentences parameter to the
ceiling of K/3. Table 9 shows average and standard deviation of ROUGE unigram f1 scores for each algorithm, over the 100 summaries. The performance
of ILP-based summarization is comparable with the other algorithms, as the
two sample t-test does not show statistically significant difference. Also, human
evaluators preferred phrase-based summary generated by our approach to the
other sentence-based summaries.
Table 9. Comparative performance of various summarization algorithms
ROUGE unigram F1
Average Std. Deviation
LSA
0.254
0.146
TextRank
0.254
0.146
LexRank
0.258
0.148
ILP-based summary 0.243
0.15
Algorithm
7
Conclusions and Further Work
In this paper, we presented an analysis of the text generated in Performance
Appraisal (PA) process in a large multi-national IT company. We performed
sentence classification to identify strengths, weaknesses and suggestions for improvements found in the supervisor assessments and then used clustering to
discover broad categories among them. As this is non-topical classification, we
found that SVM with ADWS kernel [16] produced the best results. We also used
multi-class multi-label classification techniques to match supervisor assessments
to predefined broad perspectives on performance. Logistic Regression classifier
was observed to produce the best results for this topical classification. Finally,
we proposed an ILP-based summarization technique to produce a summary of
peer feedback comments for a given employee and compared it with manual
summaries.
The PA process also generates much structured data, such as supervisor
ratings. It is an interesting problem to compare and combine the insights from
discovered from structured data and unstructured text. Also, we are planning
to automatically discover any additional performance attributes to the list of 15
attributes currently used by HR.
References
1. M. Apte, S. Pawar, S. Patil, S. Baskaran, A. Shrivastava, and G.K. Palshikar. Short
text matching in performance management. In Proceedings of the 21st International
13
Conference on Management of Data (COMAD 2016), pages 13–23, 2016.
2. Vitor R. Carvalho and William W. Cohen. Improving ”email speech acts” analysis via n-gram selection. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2006 Workshop on
Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech, ACTS ’09, pages 35–41, 2006.
3. W.W. Cohen, V.R. Carvalho, and T.M. Mitchell. Learning to classify email
into ”speech acts”. In Proc. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
(EMNLP-2004), pages 309–316, 2004.
4. Rachel Cotterill. Question classification for email. In Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. Computational Semantics (IWCS 2011), 2011.
5. S. Deshpande, G.K. Palshilkar, and G Athiappan. An unsupervised approach to
sentence classification. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Management of Data (COMAD
2010), pages 88–99, 2010.
6. Shantanu Godbole and Sunita Sarawagi. Discriminative methods for multi-labeled
classification. In PAKDD 2004, pages 22–30, 2004.
7. B. Hachey and C. Grover. Sequence modelling for sentence classification in a legal
summarisation system. In Proc. 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing,
2005.
8. George Karypis. Cluto-a clustering toolkit. Technical report, DTIC Document,
2002.
9. A. Khoo, Y. Marom, and D. Albrecht. Experiments with sentence classification.
In Proc. 2006 Australasian Language Technology Workshop (ALTW2006), pages
18–25, 2006.
10. P.E. Levy and J.R. Williams. The social context of performance appraisal: a review
and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6):881–905, 2004.
11. Chin-Yew Lin. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In
Text summarization branches out: Proceedings of the ACL-04 workshop, volume 8.
Barcelona, Spain, 2004.
12. L. McKnight and P. Srinivasan. Categorization of sentence types in medical abstracts. In Proc. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium,
pages 440–444, 2003.
13. K.R. Murphy and J. Cleveland. Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social,
Organizational and Goal-Based Perspective. Sage Publishers, 1995.
14. Stanislaw Osinski, Jerzy Stefanowski, and Dawid Weiss. Lingo: Search results clustering algorithm based on singular value decomposition. In Intelligent Information
Processing and Web Mining, Proceedings of the International IIS: IIPWM’04 Conference held in Zakopane, Poland, May 17-20, 2004, pages 359–368, 2004.
15. G.K. Palshikar, S. Deshpande, and S. Bhat. Quest: Discovering insights from survey
responses. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Data Mining Conf. (AusDM09),
pages 83–92, 2009.
16. S. Pawar, N. Ramrakhiyani, G. K. Palshikar, and S. Hingmire. Deciphering review
comments: Identifying suggestions, appreciations and complaints. In Proc. 20th
Int. Conf. on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (NLDB
2015), LNCS 9103, pages 204–211, 2015.
17. Ashequl Qadir and Ellen Riloff. Classifying sentences as speech acts in message
board posts. In Proc. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP2011), 2011.
18. N. Ramrakhiyani, S. Pawar, and G.K. Palshikar. A system for classification of
propositions of the indian supreme court judgements. In Proc. 5th 2013 Forum on
Information Retrieval Evaluation (FIRE 2013), pages 1–4, 2013.
14
19. N. Ramrakhiyani, S. Pawar, G.K. Palshikar, and M. Apte. Aspects from appraisals:
A label propagation with prior induction approach. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems
(NLDB 2016), volume LNCS 9612, pages 301–309, 2016.
20. M. Schraeder, J. Becton, and R. Portis. A critical examination of performance
appraisals. The Journal for Quality and Participation, (spring):20–25, 2007.
21. Andreas Stolcke, Klaus Ries, Noah Coccaro, Elizabeth Shriberg, Rebecca Bates,
Daniel Jurafsky, Paul Taylor, Rachel Martin, Carol Van Ess-Dykema, and Marie
Meteer. Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3), 2000.
22. C. Viswesvaran. Assessment of individual job performance: a review of the past
century and a look ahead. In N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil, and C. Viswesvaran, editors, Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology. Sage
Publishers, 2001.
23. Y. Yamamoto and T. Takagi. A sentence classification system for multi biomedical
literature summarization. In Proc. 21st International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops, pages 1163–1168, 2005.
| 2cs.AI
|
arXiv:1212.2341v1 [cs.PL] 11 Dec 2012
Semantics and Security Issues in JavaScript
Sémantique et problèmes de sécurité en JavaScript
Deliverable Resilience FUI 12:
7.3.2.1 Failles de sécurité en JavaScript
/ JavaScript security issues
Stéphane Ducasse, Nicolas Petton, Guillermo Polito, Damien Cassou
Version 1.2 - December 2012
Resilience
Inria
Copyright © 2012 by S. Ducasse, N. Petton, G. Polito, D. Cassou.
The contents of this deliverable are protected under Creative Commons Attribution-NoncommercialShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to Remix — to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not
in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work
only under the same, similar or a compatible license.
• For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-sa/3.0/
• Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
• Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights.
Your fair dealing and other rights are in no way affected by the above. This is a human-readable
summary of the Legal Code (the full license):
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/legalcode
2
Resilience
Inria
Deliverable: 7.3.2.1 Failles de sécurité en Javascript
Title: Semantics and Security Issues in JavaScript
Titre: Sémantique et problèmes de sécurité en JavaScript
Version: 1.2
Authors: Stéphane Ducasse, Nicolas Petton, Guillermo Polito, Damien Cassou
Description de la tâche 7.3.2.1 / Task 7.3.2.1 Description:
Les environnements d’exécution Javascript comportent des failles de sécurité
liées à la sémantique d’ECMAScript ainsi qu’à la présence de certains constructeurs. D’autres failles sont liées à la mise en oeuvre pratique d’ECMAScript par les
navigateurs. L’objectif de cette tâche est d’identifier et classer les types de failles de
sécurité dans le monde Javascript. On consultera notamment les travaux de Miller
autour de Caja et ainsi que les approches proposées par Seaside un framework pour
le développement d’applications sécurisées en Smalltalk. L’objectif de la tâche est
de formaliser les mécanismes de sécurité en Javascript de façon à augmenter la
connaissance des partenaires et des utilisateurs de Javascript sur ce sujet.
3
Resilience
Inria
Contents
1
.
.
.
.
2
2
3
3
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
5
6
7
7
8
9
9
10
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
12
12
12
13
15
16
18
19
20
4
JavaScript programming practices
4.1 Defining prototypes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2 Closures and ‘functional’ inheritance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23
23
26
5
ECMAScript 5
5.1 Object creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2 Defining object properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28
28
29
6
Key Bibliography Elements
32
7
Conclusion
33
2
3
Web architecture basics
1.1 Client-Server basics . . . . . . . . .
1.2 Web Browser window insfrastructure
1.3 Cookies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.4 AJAX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
JavaScript object model in a nutshell
2.1 Objects: the basic building block of JavaScript .
2.2 Property access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Functions: behavioral units . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4 Programmatic function evaluation . . . . . . .
2.5 Object methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.6 Higher-order functions . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.7 Object constructors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.8 Object core properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Key subtle JavaScript points
3.1 Variables and scope . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 The window object . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 this: an overly dynamic pseudo-variable
3.4 Object constructors misuse . . . . . . .
3.5 Lexical closures and unbound variables
3.6 The with statement . . . . . . . . . . .
3.7 Lifted Variable Definitions . . . . . . .
3.8 Type coercion . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Abstract
There is a plethora of research articles describing the deep semantics of JavaScript.
Nevertheless, such articles are often difficult to grasp for readers not familiar with
formal semantics. In this report, we propose a digest of the semantics of JavaScript
centered around security concerns. This document proposes an overview of the
JavaScript language and the misleading semantic points in its design. The first
part of the document describes the main characteristics of the language itself. The
second part presents how those characteristics can lead to problems. It finishes
by showing some coding patterns to avoid certain traps and presents some ECMAScript 5 new features.
Resilience
Inria
Chapter1. Web architecture basics
In this chapter we present some basics principles of common web architecture and
in which JavaScript applications are deployed.
1.1
Client-Server basics
The web is based on the client-server architectural pattern:
• the client role is played by a web browser with limited resources and technologies – often HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Its usual main responsibilities
are user interface and interaction as well as data validation.
• the server role is fulfilled by a program implemented in a wide variety of
technologies, with a controlled set of resources. Its usual responsibilities
are to serve pages to web-browsers, enforce business rules, and persist and
validate data.
The client and server processes communicate though the HTTP protocol [Mog02]:
the client makes HTTP requests and, for each, the server answers with an HTTP
response, as illustrated in Figure 1.1. When the response arrives, the web browser
normally discards the current content and loads the new one, causing a full refresh
of the user interface. Since HTTP is a stateless protocol – requests are independent from each others – several mechanisms were built to maintain state between a
client and a server (e.g., cookies, see section 1.3).
As computers running web browsers become more and more powerful, there
is a tendency to move responsibilities from the server to the client (e.g., page creation and business rules enforcement). These new responsibilites are mostly implemented in JavaScript and JavaScript-based languages.
1. Request
Web Browser
HTTP Server
2. Response
Figure 1.1: An HTTP request and response between a web browser and a web
server
2
Resilience
Inria
frames
*
window
parent 1
1
document
cookie
Figure 1.2: The JavaScript model of a web page
1.2
Web Browser window insfrastructure
A web page is composed of several html widgets including frames and iframes,
which insert an existing web page into the current one. Frames and iFrames are
considered web pages by themselves, therefore having the ability to contain other
ones, following the composite design pattern [GHJV95].
While loading a web page, a web browser generates an internal structure of
JavaScript objects. Each web page is represented as a window object referencing
its parent and children through the parent and frames properties.
Each web page also references a document object, which is the root of the
DOM – Document Object Model – representation of the web page tags.
Web browser JavaScript implementation differences
As each web browser has its own implementation of the DOM and JavaScript,
one of the hardest tasks of JavaScript development is to build browser-agnostic
applications. There exist several libraries to reduce the difficulty of this task such
as extJS1 ,jQuery2 and scriptaculous.3
1.3
Cookies
A cookie is a string that is exchanged between the client and the server [MFF01].
Cookies are normally stored on the client machines to let web application state
survive after the client process is stopped (i.e., the browser or the browsing tab is
closed).
Cookies are key-value pairs associated with the equals character ’=’ and separated from each other with a semi colon (e.g.,, "name=john;expires=2013-011
http://www.sencha.com/products/extjs/
http://jquery.com/
3
http://script.aculo.us/
2
3
Resilience
Inria
15T21:47:38Z"). The expiration date tells the browser when to delete it. A cookie
can contain other properties like domain and path, that tells the browser in which
requests it should be exchanged, which by default are the current domain and path.
Cookies can be changed from JavaScript code accessing the cookie property of
the current document object. Cookies can contain sensible data (e.g., emails and
passwords) and must be studied for a security analysis.
1.4
AJAX
AJAX stands for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML: it is a mechanism to send
XMLHttpRequest requests to a web server. XMLHttpRequest is used to retrieve
data from a URL without reloading the complete web page [MvD07]. The request is sent by the client through a JavaScript API and handled asynchronously.
Formerly, AJAX was used to exchange information in XML format, but XMLHttpRequest can be used to transfer any kind of data. Nowadays, one of the most
used formats is JSON,4 which stands for JavaScript Object Notation.
Illustrated in Example 1.1, the "test.json" service is requested to the server via
AJAX, and a function is used to determine how the response will be handled at the
time it arrives.
$.ajax({
url: "http://www.webcompany.com/api/test.json",
}).done(
// Function is evaluated after the json service responds:
function() {
// adds a 'class' attribute to current HTML node
$(this).addClass("done");
});
Example 1.1: AJAX request performed with JQuery Library
AJAX is becoming more and more popular as the client machines become more
powerful and can perform heavier processing tasks.
4
http://www.json.org
4
Resilience
Inria
Chapter2. JavaScript object model in a nutshell
In this chapter we present key aspects of ECMAScript 3 and 51 to provide a common context. This document has been written in the context of the Resilience
project. This study is focused on the semantic aspects of JavaScript in the context
of securing untrusted third party JavaScript code in a web browser. In this context,
one of the key aspects is to forbid the access to the window object (the global object of the web browser frame, see 3.2). Accessing the window object of the frame
would lead to possible page-data leak (window is the root of the DOM of the page),
sensitive information leak (from the window object private information in cookies
can be accessed), and even user actions sniffing (having access to DOM elements
means that one can add listeners to DOM events2 ). In the next deliverable we
will describe the state of the art of JavaScript sandboxing. One of the different aspects in JavaScript sandboxing is to securely forbid access to potentially sensitive
objects, including window, the root object.
2.1
Objects: the basic building block of JavaScript
JavaScript is a loosely-typed dynamic programming language where everything is an object. Each object contains a set of properties (also named slots) that
represent data (other objects) and operations (function objects). These properties
are always public and can be accessed and modified using the dot or squaredbracket notation:
// We create a new empty object
var person = new Object();
// Write a property
person.age = 5;
person['age'] = 5; // equivalent
// Read a property and store it into some variable
var theAge = person.age;
var theAge = person['age']; // equivalent
Example 2.1: Property access
In this script we create a new object that we assign to the variable person.
Then the expression person.age = 5 adds a property to the newly created object
and stores the value 5 into it. Note that objects are hash tables. The expression {a:
1
2
ECMAScript is the standard JavaScript is based on.
Adding event listeners to DOM objects allows an attacker to catch user interactions and inputs.
5
Resilience
Inria
0} thus creates an object with one property named a with value 0. Because of this,
properties can be accessed and set using both the person[’age’] and person.age
notations.
2.2
Property access
ECMAScript’s property lookup is done at runtime (see Example 2.2) and never
throws errors. Example 2.2 defines an object object containing two properties a and
b with values 10 and 5 respectively. The function get is then defined. This function
takes as argument a property’s name and returns the corresponding property’s value
of the object. In the last line of Example 2.2, the function get is called twice to
access the values of the properties a and b.
var object = {a : 10, b: 5};
var get = function(property) {
return object[property]
};
get("a") + get("b"); // answers 15
Example 2.2: Property lookup at runtime
If a property does not exist, the undefined object is returned, as shown in Example 2.3.
var object = {a: 1, b: 2};
object.c // answers 'undefined'
Example 2.3: Property access for nonexistent properties
Example 2.4 shows how to update, create and delete properties. The first instruction sets 10 to the property a of object {a: 0}. Therefore the expression returns
an object with the property a with 10 as a value.
The second instruction shows that if a property does not exist then it will be
created automatically. Hence, {a: 0}[b]=10 returns an object with two properties a
and b.
Finally, the third instruction removes the property b of the object using the
delete keyword.
// Updating a property
{a: 0}[a] = 10; // answers {a: 10}
// Creating a new property using the same syntax
{a: 0}[b] = 10; // answers {a: 0, b: 10}
6
Resilience
Inria
// Deleting a property
delete {a: 0, b: 5}[b]; // answers {a: 0}
Example 2.4: Updating, creating and deleting properties
2.3
Functions: behavioral units
Functions are the behavioral units of JavaScript. A function performs a side
effect (e.g., alters an object) and/or returns a value.
Functions can be defined via a function declaration or a function expression.
A function declaration defines a function at compile time, as seen in Example 2.5.
A function expression creates a new function at runtime. Function expressions are
also called anonymous functions, since they are not associated with any name. The
creation of a function from a function expression is illustrated in Example 2.6.
function sum(a, b){
return a + b;
}
Example 2.5: A function declaration has a name
var sum = function (a, b){
return a + b;
}
Example 2.6: An anonymous function that is assigned to a variable
A function can be called by passing arguments between parenthesis as shown
in Example 2.7.
sum(1, 2);
someFunctionWithNoArguments();
Example 2.7: Calling a function
Functions are important because they constitute the basic building block of
code execution in a JavaScript program.
2.4
Programmatic function evaluation
The built-in call() and apply() functions are two methods of the Function object.3 These functions are thus called on other functions and execute them. These
3
In JavaScript, the words ’method’ and ’function’ are equivalent. The former is particularly used
when the function is owned by an object as one of its properties.
7
Resilience
Inria
functions both take the receiver of the function to execute as first parameter and
arguments of the function to execute as the other parameters. When using these
methods, the pseudo-variable this in the function to execute is bound to the first parameter of call() and apply(). call() receives the arguments of the function to execute
as comma-separated values whereas apply() receives an array (see Example 2.8).
function someGlobalFunction(value1, value2){
this.value1 = value1;
this.value2 = value2;
}
// The regular invocation binds 'this' to the global object as
// we will see later on
someGlobalFunction(5,6);
window.value1 // answers 5
var someObject = new Object();
someGlobalFunction.call(someObject, 5, 6);
someObject.value1 // answers 5
someGlobalFunction.apply(someObject, [5, 6]); // equivalent
Example 2.8: The apply() and call() methods
Turning text into function at runtime. Using the eval() built-in function, it is
possible to evaluate a string at runtime. eval() makes static analysis of programs
difficult [RHBV11]: at runtime a string can be composed and evaluated without
restriction in the global environment and scope.
var a = 2;
eval('a++');
a // answers 3
Example 2.9: Evaluating code from a string
2.5
Object methods
In JavaScript, methods are just functions attached to an object as can be seen
in Example 2.10.
var person = new Object();
person.name = 'John';
person.surname = 'Foo';
8
Resilience
Inria
person.getFullName = function (){
return this.name + ' ' + this.surname;
}
Example 2.10: Adding methods to an object
In a method, a developer can refer to the owner object using the this keyword.
We will see later that this has a different semantics than in Java or Smalltalk since
depending on how the function is accessed this can be bound to the object owner
of the property or any other object (see section 3.3).
2.6
Higher-order functions
Functions in JavaScript, as first class citizens, can be passed as parameters to
functions and returned from functions. Higher-order functions are most commonly
seen when implementing filtering, selection and sorting algorithms to make them
independent of their content. In Example 2.11, we define a new property inherited
by all arrays that is a function to filter elements of the receiver array according to
a given criteria. Then, we define a function isEven that will play the role of the
criteria and an array of numbers. The last statement calls the new filter property
function on array with the isEven criteria.
Array.prototype.filter = function (criteria){
newArray = new Array();
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
// we keep the elements of the array that respects
// a certain criteria
if (criteria(this[i]))
newArray.push(this[i]);
}
return newArray;
}
var isEven = function(elem) { return (elem % 2) == 0; };
var array = new Array(9, 58, 42, 12, 1001, 1000);
array.filter(isEven); // answers [58, 42, 12, 1000]
Example 2.11: Extending Arrays with a higher-order filter function
2.7
Object constructors
Constructors are used to structure object creation in ECMAScript 3[MMT08,
GSK10]. A constructor is a standard function object whose name is by convention
capitalized to indicate to the programmer that the function must not be directly
called. The new keyword is used to invoke a function as a constructor. Using the
9
Resilience
Inria
new keyword instantiates an object and executes the constructor on that object,
binding the pseudo-variable this to the newly created object.
var Animal = function (name) {
this.name = name;
this.describe = function() {
return this.name + ', an animal';
}
};
//Invoking the constructor with the 'new' keyword
var animal = new Animal("pilou");
animal.name; // 'pilou'
animal.describe() // 'pilou, an animal'
Example 2.12: The new keyword
2.8
Object core properties
There are three properties that are key to the execution of any JavaScript application:
• constructor is a property that contains the reference to the function that was
used to create the object using the new keyword. In Figure 2.1, the animal object has a property constructor containing a reference to the Animal
constructor that was used to create animal.
• prototype is a property that is used by constructors to initialize the inheritance chain (modeled by the __proto__ property) of objects they create. This
property only makes sense on function objects that are used as constructors.
In Figure 2.1, the Animal constructor has a property prototype containing a
reference to an object (with an isAnAnimal property) that will be the parent
of all objects Animal creates.
• __proto__ is a property that contains a reference to an object (the parent)
where properties will be looked up when not present in the receiver. When
an object is created, the value of its __proto__ property is initialized to the
prototype property of the constructor function used to create this object. In
Figure 2.1, the animal object has as parent the object whose only property
is isAnAnimal: this object is the prototype of the Animal constructor. Attention: this property is not always visible from a developer’s point of view
depending on the JavaScript implementation: you should avoid manipulating
__proto__ if you want to write portable code.
10
Resilience
Inria
constructor
Function
constructor
{isAnAnimal: true}
prototype
Animal
__proto__
function () {}
constructor
__proto__
undef
prototype
animal
{name: 'pilou'}
Figure 2.1: The 3 core properties of objects (constructor, prototype, __proto__).
Boxes in gray represent objects created by the code of Example 2.13 whereas boxes
in white represent objects provided by JavaScript.
Example 2.13 demonstrates that the __proto__ property is initialized to the
constructor’s prototype property value. First, a function is defined and assigned to
a new variable Animal. The prototype of new functions is always an empty object.
In this case, we add the property isAnAnimal to this empty object. All objects
created from the Animal function will then inherit the isAnAnimal property. The
variable animal is then set to a new Animal. The rest of the statements describe the
relationship between animal and its constructor Animal.
var Animal = function (name) { this.name = name; };
Animal.prototype.isAnAnimal = true;
var animal = new Animal("pilou");
animal.constructor == Animal; // answers true
animal.__proto__ == animal.constructor.prototype; // answers true
animal.isAnAnimal; // answers true
Animal.isAnAnimal; // answers false, 'isAnAnimal' is not a property of
// the constructor but of objects it constructs
Example 2.13: Defining a constructor so that Figure 2.1 can show the core
properties involved
11
Resilience
Inria
Chapter3. Key subtle JavaScript points
In the following we present the subtle aspects of JavaScript that have an impact on
security such as unbound variables [MMT08, Dav06].
3.1
Variables and scope
All objects inside a web browser frame share the same environment without
any restriction. This is a security problem because it allows dynamic modifications
of the program and full access to all the objects defined inside this environment.
To declare a variable local in a particular scope such as a function scope the
var keyword is needed, as illustrated in Example 3.1. Here the variable myLocalVariable is local and only accessible from within the body of the function myFunction.
function myFunction(arg) {
var myLocalVariable = arg + 5;
return myLocalVariable;
}
Example 3.1: declaring a variable local to the function
Not using var causes our program to create a global variable (see Example 3.2)
[MMT08, Dav06, GSK10].
(function () { globalVar = 'setting global'; })()
window.globalVar // answers 'setting global'
Example 3.2: using a global variable
In this example, globalVar becomes a property of the global environment window.
3.2
The window object
The window object represents the window of the current HTML document.
Each web browser’s tab, frame, or window has its own window object.
The window object is the global object of the JavaScript environment. Each
function that is not attached to another object is attached to window, as illustrated in
Example 3.3. This behavior combined with the dynamic binding of the this pseudovariable (see 3.3) can have deep side effects on security of your applications.
12
Resilience
Inria
window.ping // answers 'undefined'
var ping = function (string) {
return string;
};
window.ping; // answers the ping function
window.ping('foo'); // answers 'foo'
Example 3.3: A function not attached to an object is attached to window
The example starts by checking that the window object has no property named
ping. Then we define a new function at the top level, which is automatically added
to the window object. Accessing window.ping returns the ping function. We check
that we can effectively execute it.
3.3
this: an overly dynamic pseudo-variable
While at first sight, this may look like the pseudo-variable in Java, C# and
Smalltalk (named self in this case), in JavaScript this has a special semantics. this
is a dynamically bound builtin pseudo-variable of JavaScript. When used inside
a function scope, the value of the pseudo-variable this is determined by the syntactic shape of the function invocation [MMT08, GSK10]. By syntactic shape, we
mean that this is bound to a different object depending on the way the invocation
expression is written.
In Example 3.4, while the same function is shared between two different objects, depending on the function invocation, this is bound to a different object.
var o = new Object();
// A new function is attached to 'o' on property 'f'
o.f = function() {return this;};
// f is invoked from o
o.f(); // answers o, so 'this' was bound to 'o'
var o2 = new Object();
// o2.f and o.f point to the same function object
o2.f = o.f;
// f is invoked from o2
o2.f(); // answers o2, so 'this' was bound to 'o2'
Example 3.4: Function invoking
The behavior described by the previous example looks natural and similar to
the one of Java and C# where this is bound to the receiver. However, the semantics
13
Resilience
Inria
behind this is more complex. Thus, depending on the way the function is invoked,
this may not refer to the object which defines the function but to the global object
window. As explained in section 3.2, every object not attached to another object is
implicitly attached to the global object window.
The following example illustrates this behavior. First, a simple object, named
o, with a method yourself is created that simply returns this. When the expression
o.yourself is executed, o is returned as expected. Then the variable yourselfFunction is defined in the context of the global environment and its value is set to the
method yourself. Now when yourselfFunction is executed, the global object window is returned instead of the object o, which defines the method.
We see that assigning a pointer to a function and invoking this function via this
pointer changes what this is bound to inside the function.
// Creates a new object with a 'yourself' method
var o = {
yourself: function() { return this; }
};
o.yourself() // answers o
//We attach o.yourself to window
var yourselfFunction = o.yourself;
yourselfFunction() // answers the 'window' object
Example 3.5: this and window interplay
As can be seen in Example 3.5 taken from [GSK10], one of the dangerous
side effects of the this semantics is the ability to retrieve the window object from a
function.
In this example, an object, named obj, is created with a property x and a method
named setX: which mutates x. The return value of the expression window.x shows
that window does not have a property x. Then the expression obj.setX(10) sets the
value of the property x of obj to 10. Then the variable named f points to the mutator
method of object obj.
Executing the mutator via the reference through f with 90 as a value will add
a variable x to window and assign it 90. Here the syntax of the method invocation
binds this to the global object window instead of obj. The value returned from
the expression obj.x shows that the property x did not change and is still holding
10. Finally, the value returned from the expression window.x shows that the object
window got a new property x holding the value 90.
14
Resilience
Inria
var obj = {
"x" : 0,
"setX": function(val) { this.x = val }
};
window.x // answers 'undefined'
obj.setX(10);
obj.x // answers 10
var f = obj.setX;
f(90);
obj.x // answers 10 (obj.x was not updated)
window.x // answers 90 (window.x was created)
Example 3.6: this and window
This section has shown that this is dynamically bound and that its binding depends on the syntactic expression from which a function is invoked. In particular,
imprecise use of this may lead to a security breach granting access to the top-level
object window (and thus any object of the web browser frame).
3.4
Object constructors misuse
Constructors used without new. When invoked without the new keyword, the
function gets evaluated in the global context. this is then bound to the window
object as seen in Example 3.7.
var Person = function (name, surname, age) {
this.name = name;
this.surname = surname;
this.age = age;
};
// Invoking the constructor as a simple function
var person = Person('John', 'Foo', 27);
person // answers 'undefined'
person.age // raises an error
window.surname // answers 'Foo'
Example 3.7: Not using the new keyword
Note that in Example 3.7, person is undefined since the constructor does not
return the object. In addition window gets an additional surname property as shown
by the last statement of the example.
Objects created using the same constructor will not share functions and data set
in the constructor. Each object will have its own copy of the initialization values.
Sharing can be achieved using the prototype as will be shown in section 4.1.
15
Resilience
Inria
Constructors returning objects.
Example 3.8 shows that values returned by functions invoked as constructors
(with the new operator) are ignored by the compiler.
var Dog = function () {
this.name = 'milou';
return 3; // this statement is ignored by the compiler
}
var dog = new Dog();
dog; // answers {name: 'milou'} as expected
Example 3.8: Returning a primitive type from a constructor function
Example 3.9 shows that when the returned object of a constructor function is
not a primitive one, the constructor actually returns it. This behavior is unspecified
by ECMAScript 5 and leads to misleading results. Constructor functions should
never explicitly return anything. The new keyword takes care of returning the
newly created object.
var Dog = function () {
this.name = 'milou';
return {name: 'tintin'}; // this statement is not ignored
}
var dog = new Dog();
dog; // unexpectedly answers {name: 'tintin'}
Example 3.9: Returning a non-primitive type from a constructor function
3.5
Lexical closures and unbound variables
JavaScript functions are lexical closures [MMT08, Dav06, GSK10]. Each lexical environment depends on its outer context. The closure scope grants access to
the function arguments (accessed by value), as well as all variables accessible from
the outer context scope, including all global variables.
In the Example 3.10, we show how a function has access to its outer scope’s
variables. outerFunction is a function which returns another function whose role
is to increment a private variable localToOuterFunction and set the value to an object’s property someProperty. We can see that innerFunction has access to the
localToOuterFunction variable defined in outerFunction. We can also see that the
two functions returned by the two calls to outerFunction have access to two different copies of localToOuterFunction.
16
Resilience
Inria
function outerFunction(obj){
var localToOuterFunction = 0;
var innerFunction = function(){
localToOuterFunction++;
obj.someProperty = localToOuterFunction;
}
return innerFunction;
}
o = new Object();
returnedFunction = outerFunction(o);
returnedFunction();
returnedFunction();
o.someProperty // answers 2
o2 = new Object();
returnedFunction = outerFunction(o2);
returnedFunction();
o2.someProperty // answers 1
o.someProperty // answers 2
Example 3.10: A function and its outer scope
A naive use of closures may lead to issues as described in Example 3.11 where
all handlers will unexpectedly always return the value 10.
var handlers = [];
for(var i=0; i < 10; i++) {
handlers[i] = function() { return i; };
};
handlers[3](); // answers 10
Example 3.11: Variable scopes in closures #1
In the for loop we iterate over i from 0 to 10. In each iteration of the loop a
closure is created and stored into the handlers array. When one of these closures
is evaluated (the fourth one here), the value returned by the closure is the current
value of i, not the value of i at the time of the closure creation.
The Example 3.12 illustrates how to use closures to solve the issue described
before. This example is the same as the previous one, only surrounding the closure
creation with an additional closure capturing the value of i inside the for loop. When
one of the closures is evaluated, the expected number is returned.
var handlers = [];
for(var i=0; i < 10; i++) {
(function (j) {
handlers[j] = function() { return j; };
17
Resilience
Inria
})(i);
};
handlers[3](); // answers 3
Example 3.12: Variable scopes in closure #2
3.6
The with statement
As described in ECMAScript 3, the JavaScript with statement adds all properties of an object to the scope of the with statement as shown in Example 3.13.
var someGlobal = 'pilou';
var obj = new Object();
obj.propertyA = 1;
with (obj) {
someGlobal = propertyA;
};
someGlobal; // answers 1
Example 3.13: Mixing scopes
The scope of the with statement includes all the variables of its outer scope (including global variables) and the object properties, overriding outer scope variables
as shown in Example 3.14. In this example, inside the with statement, there is potentially two targets for the propertyA name: this name could be referring to either
the global variable (with value ’property’) or to the property of obj (with value 1).
When using with, properties of the object passed as parameter to with always take
precedence.
var propertyA = 'property';
var someGlobal = 'pilou';
var obj = new Object();
obj.propertyA = 1;
with (obj) {
someGlobal = propertyA; // 'propertyA' is the property of obj
};
someGlobal; // answers 1
Example 3.14: Overriding outer scope variables
Using with is not recommended and is even forbidden in ECMAScript 5 strict
mode. The recommended alternative is to assign the object’s wanted properties to
a temporary variable.
18
Resilience
Inria
The dynamic nature of JavaScript combined with scope mixture lowers the
predictability of JavaScript programs.
3.7
Lifted Variable Definitions
Local variables are automatically lifted to the top of the function in which they
appear. For example in the following function foo(), the return statement has access
to the variable x that was defined inside the if branch.
function foo() {
if (true) {
var x = 10;
}
return x;
}
foo(); // answers 10
This happens because Javascript automatically rewrite the previous code to
something like the following:
function foo() {
var x;
if (true) {
x = 10;
}
return x;
}
foo(); // answers 10
Such behavior can lead to unintuitive results as demonstrated in the following
example.
function foo(x) {
return function() {
var x = x;
return x;
}
}
foo(200)(); // answers undefined
The function returned by the function foo does not return the value passed to
foo but undefined (the value of unaffected variables). In this last example we might
expect the x on the right-hand side of var x = x to reference the argument x of foo.
19
Resilience
Inria
Nevertheless, due to lifting, all bound occurrences of x in the nested function refer
to the local variable x as is made clear in the following rewrite:
function foo(x) {
return function() {
var x; // JavaScript splits "var x = x" in two statements
x = x;
return x;
}
}
foo(200)(); // answers undefined
The expression var x = x reads and writes back the initial value of x (i.e., undefined). var x = x works as var x; x = x; hence the right-hand x of the assignment
refer to the local variable x.
3.8
Type coercion
JavaScript performs type coercion (implicit type conversion) over objects on,
for example, comparisons and if statements checks. The automatic type coercions
performed by JavaScript are well known causes of bugs which lower the robustness
of JavaScript applications.
The basic rules about type coercion are [ECM11]:
Boolean coercion. When expecting a boolean value, as in the if statements, JavaScript
transforms the result of our expression automatically into a boolean value. Values
equivalent to false are null, undefined, false, +0, -0, NaN and the empty string. The
rest of the JavaScript objects are coerced to true.
var falsyValue = false;
if(!"") {
falsyValue = true;
}
falsyValue // Answers true
falsyValue = false;
if(0) {
falsyValue = true;
}
falsyValue // Answers false
Equality coercion. When two objects are compared (as via the equality operator
==), depending on their types, none, one or both objects are coerced before being
compared. After coercion, if both operands have the same type, the comparison is
20
Resilience
Inria
finally resolved by the strict equality operator. Depending on the type, valueOf()
or toString() may be implicitely performed on the compared objects. In addition,
when performing an equality comparison, the following objects are considered as
false: null, 0, false, ” and NaN.
false == 0 // answers true
0 == false // answers true
"" == 0 // answers true
false == "" // answers true
{} == {} // answers false
var n = {
valueOf: function () {
return 1;
},
toString: function () {
return "2";
}
};
n == 1; // answers true
n == "2"; // answers false
var n = {
toString: function () {
return "2";
}
};
n == 1; // answers false
n == "2"; // answers true
[ [ [ 42 ] ] ] == 42; // answers true. valueOf() an array with one
element answers its element
true + 3; // answers 4
Example 3.15: Some unintuitive examples of type coercion
Strict equality coercion. The strict equality operator === compares both type
and value of the operands, without performing type coercions. It only resolves to
true, when both operands have the same type and value. The only exception are
non-primitive objects, which are strictly equal if they are the same object.
21
Resilience
Inria
false === 0 // answers false
0 === false // answers false
"" === 0 // answers false
false === "" // answers false
1 === 1 // answers true
{} === {} // answers false
22
Resilience
Inria
Chapter4. JavaScript programming practices
This section presents different coding practices in JavaScript development (ECMAScript 3) that result in robust, extensible and understandable sofware. In particular, we stress the semantics of the new constructor and its impact on inheritance
[Dou08].
4.1
Defining prototypes
JavaScript as defined in ECMAScript 3 is a prototype-based object-oriented
language where each object has a prototype (referenced in the __proto__ core
property). The object inherits all properties from it. Since the prototype is also
an object, the prototype chain inheritance is similar to a class hierarchy in classbased object-oriented languages.
Constructors structure object creation and initialize properties. Each time an
object is created, a different copy of each attribute specified in the constructor is
assigned to the object. When sharing is needed between objects, the shared properties must be defined in the constructor’s prototype as can be seen in Example 4.1
and Figure 4.1.
var Cat = function (color, name) {
this.color = color;
this.name = name || 'default name';
}
Cat.prototype.numberOfLegs = 4;
var garfield = new Cat('red', 'Garfield');
var azrael = new Cat('black', 'Azrael');
garfield.color; // answers 'red'
garfield.numberOfLegs; // answers 4
azrael.color; // answers 'black'
azrael.numberOfLegs; // answers 4
Cat.prototype.numberOfLegs = 5;
garfield.numberOfLegs; // answers 5
azrael.numberOfLegs; // answers 5
azrael.color = 'grey';
garfield.color; // answers 'red'
23
Resilience
Inria
__proto__
{numberOfLegs: 5}
__proto__
prototype
Cat
constructor
garfield
{color: 'red',
name: 'Garfield'}
azrael
{color: 'black',
name: 'Azrael'}
Figure 4.1: Sharing a property between objects (see Example 4.1)
azrael.color; // answers 'grey'
Example 4.1: Sharing a value between objects through their prototype (see
Figure 4.1)
When a new object is created by calling a constructor, its __proto__ core property is initialized to the constructor’s prototype property value. In Example 4.2
we set the prototype of function Dog to be an object created from function Animal
(see Figure 4.2). Note that we have to set the constructor of the prototype to be
the function Dog. Then when an object created from the function Dog is asked
for a property that it does not define locally, the lookup is performed following the
prototype chain (i.e.,, looking inside the __proto__ core property value). Here the
property isAnAnimal is found in the prototype of Dog which is an object created
from the Animal constructor.
var Animal = function () { };
Animal.prototype.isAnAnimal = true;
var animal = new Animal();
var Dog = function () {};
// The prototype of Dog is set to a new Animal,
// so that future Dog objects will inherit from Animal.prototype
Dog.prototype = new Animal();
// We need to manually change Dog.prototype.constructor so that
// future Dog objects will have Dog as constructor
24
Resilience
Inria
{isAnAnimal: true}
prototype
Animal
constructor
__proto__
__proto__
animal
prototype
{isADog: true}
__proto__
constructor
Dog
dog
Figure 4.2: Prototypical inheritance (see Example 4.2)
// (instead of Animal).
Dog.prototype.constructor = Dog;
// All Dog objects must share this property
Dog.prototype.isADog = true;
var dog = new Dog();
dog.isAnAnimal; // answers true
dog.isADog; // answers true
Example 4.2: Inheritance in JavaScript prototypical programming (see Figure 4.2)
Accessing overridden functions. Other object-oriented languages have a message
resend mechanism, often implemented as super sends. To perform super sends in
JavaScript, the lookup must be explicitly forwarded to the prototype (see Example 4.3 and Figure 4.3).
// 'Object' being a function, we add a new method to all objects
Object.prototype.superSend = function (selector, args) {
// We use 'inheritsFrom' to reference the prototype and we search
// the property in variable 'selector' from this prototype:
return this.inheritsFrom[selector].apply(this, args);
};
var Animal = function () { };
Animal.prototype.say = function (string) {
return 'hello ' + string;
};
25
Resilience
Inria
Object
prototype
{superSend: ... }
__proto__
Animal
prototype
{say: ... }
inheritsFrom __proto__
Dog
constructor
prototype
new Animal()
{say: ...}
__proto__
constructor
new Dog()
Figure 4.3: Message resending – super sends (see Example 4.3)
var Dog = function () { };
Dog.prototype = new Animal();
// We add our own property to retain inheritance
// without using the not standard __proto__
Dog.prototype.inheritsFrom = Dog.prototype.constructor.prototype;
Dog.prototype.constructor = Dog;
new Dog().inheritsFrom === new Dog().__proto__.__proto__; // answers true
Dog.prototype.say = function (string) {
return this.superSend('say',['wouf wouf']);
};
new Dog().say("I'm a dog"); // answers 'hello wouf wouf'
Example 4.3: Message resending – super sends (see Figure 4.3)
The dynamic capabilities of JavaScript allow the usage of this mechanism to
extend existing objects like Arrays, Numbers, and Functions, through the addition
of properties and methods to their prototype constructors.
4.2
Closures and ‘functional’ inheritance
We’ve previously shown an example of how to provide an inheritance-like relation in JavaScript using prototypes, allowing us to share properties and methods between our objects. Unfortunately, the builtin inheritance mechanism of ECMAScript 3 has several drawbacks: (1) it depends on many implementation details
that could lead to several mistakes, (2) it does not provide any access protection
26
Resilience
Inria
between objects, their prototypes, and the outer scope.
In Example 4.4 a JavaScript idiom appears showing how we can use closures
to support visibility principles such as private attributes and inheritance [Dou08]
instead of the typical prototype relationship we just described. The main idea is to
create functions that create and initialize an object – declared as that in the example
– with default values and methods. The values set in the object’s properties will
be public values. We can also define and use variables and functions with the var
keyword to make them private to our object. To customize the initialization, we
can also pass an object as a parameter to this function as a spec hash-table.
var animal = function (spec) {
// We take either the parameter or the empty object if
// spec is null
spec = spec || {};
var that = {};
// Initialization
that.isAnAnimal = true;
// Private
var name = spec.name || 'unnamed';
// Public
that.getName = function() {
return name;
};
return that;
};
var dog = function (spec) {
spec = spec || {};
var that = animal(spec); // makes dog inherits from animal
that.isADog = true;
return that;
};
var aDog = dog({name: 'milou'});
aDog.isAnAnimal; // answers 'true'
aDog.isADog; // answers 'true'
aDog.getName(); // answers 'milou'
aDog.name; // answers 'undefined'
Example 4.4: Using closures to support access visibility to properties
27
Resilience
Inria
Chapter5. ECMAScript 5
We also present an overview of the features of ECMAScript 5 [ECM97, ECM11].
Released in June 2011, ECMAScript 5 defines the latest standarized version
of the JavaScript language. This release includes improvements and clarifications
compared to ECMAScript 4. In this section we propose a survey of two important
aspects of ECMAScript 5: object creation and properties access. These aspects
improve object encapsulation, giving a finer-grained object-property definition and
thus improving security.
5.1
Object creation
ECMAScript 5 offers a new way to instantiate objects with the ability to specify
the new object’s prototype and properties.
var objOld = new Object();
var objNew = Object.create(null); // new function from ECMAScript 5
// a.isPrototypeOf(b) checks if 'a' is in the __proto__
inheritance
// chain of b (i.e., b is derived from a)
Object.prototype.isPrototypeOf(objOld); // answers true
Object.prototype.isPrototypeOf(objNew); // answers false
objOld.toString; // answers a function
objNew.toString; // answers 'undefined'
Example 5.1: Creating an object with null as prototype
Example 5.1 shows how to create a new object named objNew that has no
prototype and no inherited property.
When passed an argument, Object.create sets the __proto__ property of the object to the argument. As a result, new Object() is equivalent to Object.create(Object.prototype).
Object.create also optionally accept a second argument that is an object whose
properties serve to initialize the new object. In Example 5.2, the object obj inherits
all standard properties from Object.prototype and defines a new property foo whose
value is the string "hello".
var obj = Object.create(Object.prototype, {
foo: { writable: true, configurable: true, value: "hello" },
});
obj.__proto__ === Object.prototype; // answers true
obj.toString; // answers a function
28
Resilience
Inria
obj.foo; // answers "hello"
Example 5.2: Creating an object with prototype and a property
The keys writable and configurable are described below.
5.2
Defining object properties
Security wise, ECMAScript 3 doesn’t have any concept of private properties.1
All object properties are publicly visible, inherited and modifiable at will. ECMAScript 5 improves the situation by introducing a fine-grain protocol to define
object properties.
Object.defineProperty is one of the core changes to JavaScript defined in EC-
MAScript 5. This function takes three parameters: the object on which the property is defined, a string (name of the new property) and a descriptor object. The
descriptor object can be a data descriptor or a getter/setter descriptor. A descriptor
object can have the following optional keys:
• enumerable: if true, the property shows up during enumeration of the properties of the receiver;
• configurable: if true, the property can be deleted, and the descriptor can be
changed afterwards.
In case of an accessor descriptor, two keys get and set can be used to define
accessor methods to the property.
In case of a data descriptor, two keys value and writable can be used to respectively set an initial value and specify if the property can be written.
var dog = {};
Object.defineProperty(dog, 'name', {
enumerable: true,
configurable: false,
value: 'Pilou',
writable: false
});
dog.name; // answers 'Pilou', the default value
dog.name = 'another name'; // tries to set a new value
dog.name; // answers 'Pilou' as the property is not writable
delete dog.name; // tries to remove the property from the object
1
We call private properties object properties that are neither enumerable nor writable.
29
Resilience
Inria
dog.name; // answers 'Pilou' as the property is not configurable
Example 5.3: Defining properties
Example 5.3 shows how to use Object.defineProperty. First an empty object
dog is created. A property ’name’ is added to dog and set a default value of ’Pilou’.
This property is neither configurable nor writable. As a result, trying to change the
value of the property dog.name or trying to delete it both fail.
Object.preventExtensions. ECMAScript 5 introduces two important functions
regarding object extensions: preventExtensions and isExtensible, both available
from Object. As seen in Example 5.4 preventExtensions takes an object as argu-
ment and prevents any further addition of properties. Existing properties may still
be deleted though. isExtensible is a testing function answering a boolean value that
indicates whether properties can be added or not.
var dog = {};
Object.defineProperty(dog, 'name', {
enumerable: true,
configurable: false,
value: 'Pilou',
writable: false
});
Object.isExtensible(dog); // answers true
Object.preventExtensions(dog);
Object.isExtensible(dog); // answers false
dog.age = 5; // tries to add a new property to 'dog'
dog.age // anwers undefined because 'dog' is not extensible
Example 5.4: Preventing object extensions
ECMAScript 5 also introduces full immutability of objects through Object.freeze,
and can be tested with Object.isFrozen, and seen in Example 5.5.
var dog = {};
Object.defineProperty(dog, 'name', {
enumerable: true,
configurable: false,
value: 'Pilou',
writable: false
});
Object.isFrozen(dog); // answers false
Object.freeze(dog);
30
Resilience
Inria
Object.isFrozen(dog); // answers true
dog.age = 5; // tries to add a new property to 'dog'
dog.age // anwers undefined because 'dog' is not extensible
delete dog.name // answers false
dog.name // answers 'Pilou'
Example 5.5: Object immutability
By adding the functions mentioned in this section (notably create, defineProperty, preventExtensions and freeze), ECMAScript 5 makes it possible for developers to secure their objects.
31
Resilience
Inria
Chapter6. Key Bibliography Elements
Here we present the key and limited articles that we encourage you to read if you
want to get deeper into the semantics of JavaScript.
• Sergio Maffeis, John C. Mitchell, and Ankur Taly. An operational semantics
for javascript. In Proceedings of the 6th Asian Symposium on Programming
Languages and Systems, APLAS ’08, pages 307-325, Berlin, Heidelberg,
2008. Springer-Verlag. The paper presents a 30-page operational semantics,
based directly on the JavaScript specification. The semantics covers most
of JavaScript directly, but does omit a few syntactic forms. They discuss
various differences between the standard and implementations.
• Arjun Guha, Claudiu Saftoiu, and Shriram Krishnamurthi. The essence of
javascript. In Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on ObjectOriented Programming, ECOOP’10, pages 126-150, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
Springer-Verlag. In this article a core calculus is defined. Based on it, several aspects of JavaScript are described. Some badly designed features of
Javascript are described.
• ECMAScript version 3.0 specification (188 pages). http://www.ecma-international.
org/publications/files/ECMA-ST-ARCH/ECMA-262,%203rd%20edition,%20December%
201999.pdf
• ECMAScript version 5.1 specification (255 pages). http://www.ecma-international.
org/publications/files/ECMA-ST-ARCH/ECMA-262%205th%20edition%20December%
202009.pdf
32
Resilience
Inria
Chapter7. Conclusion
This deliverable has introduced an overall picture of JavaScript as defined in ECMAScript 3 and ECMAScript 5, focusing on security aspects of its semantics. We
offered a detailed review of JavaScript subtle points concerning security and application predictability.
We have seen that the window object is key to data privacy protection. Nevertheless, we have pointed out how JavaScript exposes window to the entire environment constraining any security approach.
We have described scoping issues and the possible resulting security leaks. For
example, the this pseudo variable is bound to a different object depending on the
way the function invocation expression is written (syntactic shape of the function
invocation in which this is used). This dynamic behavior can be exploited by an
attacker to leak private objects. As another example, the fact that JavaScript lifts
variable definitions inside functions (i.e., moves to the top) leads to unsuspected
variable shadowing, dramatically lowering behavior predictability.
In the last chapter, we have proposed a description of ECMAScript 5 features
regarding object declaration and property access that improve encapsulation, therefore securing exposure of objects.
In the following deliverable, we will leverage this knowledge, detailing existing
sandboxing techniques, and for each of them, we will review its advantages and
weaknesses in different contexts.
33
Resilience
Inria
Bibliography
[Dav06]
Flanagan David. JavaScript: The Definitive Guide. O’Reilly Media,
Inc., fifth edition, 2006.
[Dou08]
Crockford Douglas. JavaScript: The Good Parts. O’Reilly Media,
Inc., 2008.
[ECM97]
ECMA, editor. ECMAScript Language Specification. European Computer Machinery Association, June 1997.
[ECM11]
ECMA, editor. ECMAScript Language Specification version 5. European Computer Machinery Association, July 2011.
[GHJV95] Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides.
Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software.
Addison-Wesley Professional, 1995.
[GSK10]
Arjun Guha, Claudiu Saftoiu, and Shriram Krishnamurthi. The
essence of javascript. In Proceedings of the 24th European conference on Object-oriented programming, ECOOP’10, pages 126–150,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag.
[MFF01]
Lynette I. Millett, Batya Friedman, and Edward Felten. Cookies and
web browser design: toward realizing informed consent online. In
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI ’01, pages 46–52, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
[MMT08] Sergio Maffeis, John C. Mitchell, and Ankur Taly. An operational
semantics for javascript. In Proceedings of the 6th Asian Symposium
on Programming Languages and Systems, APLAS ’08, pages 307–
325, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.
[Mog02]
Jeffery C. Mogul. Clarifying the fundamentals of http. In Proceedings
of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’02,
pages 25–36, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
[MvD07]
Ali Mesbah and Arie van Deursen. Migrating multi-page web applications to single-page ajax interfaces. In Proceedings of the 11th
European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering,
CSMR ’07, pages 181–190, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society.
34
Resilience
Inria
[RHBV11] Gregor Richards, Christian Hammer, Brian Burg, and Jan Vitek. The
eval that men do: A large-scale study of the use of eval in javascript
applications. In Proceedings of Ecoop 2011, 2011.
35
| 6cs.PL
|
A Literature Based Approach to Define the Scope of Biomedical
Ontologies: A Case Study on a Rehabilitation Therapy Ontology
Mohammad K. Halawani 1 , 3∗, Rob Forsyth 2 and Phillip Lord 1
1
arXiv:1709.09450v1 [cs.IR] 27 Sep 2017
School of Computing Science
Newcastle University, UK
2
Institute of Neuroscience
Newcastle University, UK
3
Department of Information Systems
Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia
ABSTRACT
In this article, we investigate our early attempts at building an
ontology describing rehabilitation therapies following brain injury.
These therapies are wide-ranging, involving interventions of many
different kinds. As a result, these therapies are hard to describe. As
well as restricting actual practice, this is also a major impediment to
evidence-based medicine as it is hard to meaningfully compare two
treatment plans.
Ontology development requires significant effort from both
ontologists and domain experts. Knowledge elicited from domain
experts forms the scope of the ontology. The process of knowledge
elicitation is expensive, consumes experts’ time and might have
biases depending on the selection of the experts. Various
methodologies and techniques exist for enabling this knowledge
elicitation, including community groups and open development
practices. A related problem is that of defining scope. By defining
the scope, we can decide whether a concept (i.e. term) should
be represented in the ontology. This is the opposite of knowledge
elicitation, in the sense that it defines what should not be in the
ontology. This can be addressed by pre-defining a set of competency
questions.
These approaches are, however, expensive and time-consuming.
Here, we describe our work toward an alternative approach,
bootstrapping the ontology from an initially small corpus of literature
that will define the scope of the ontology, expanding this to a set
covering the domain, then using information extraction to define an
initial terminology to provide the basis and the competencies for the
ontology. Here, we discuss four approaches to building a suitable
corpus that is both sufficiently covering and precise.
1
INTRODUCTION
Rehabilitation therapies, unlike pharmacologic therapies, are
difficult to define precisely both qualitatively and quantitatively (van
Heugten et al., 2012) and many approaches have been taken to
trying to parse them. It is recognised that traditional approaches
to designation (e.g. “dressing practice”) are flawed as two
professionals’ rehabilitation sessions both targeting difficulties in
dressing could differ in pertinent active ingredients (e.g. actions,
chemicals, devices, or forms of energy) as experienced by the
patient. Assumptions that rehabilitation content can be inferred from
∗ To
whom
correspondence
[email protected]
should
be
addressed:
the targeted impairment (e.g. “balance training”) as flawed: no one
would consider it appropriate to consider bariatric surgery, calorierestricted diets and exercise programmes together as equivalent
forms of “obesity therapy” (Whyte et al., 2014). This lack of a
shared terminology makes it difficult to describe, measure and
meaningfully compare rehabilitation therapies and treatments.
Building a taxonomy for rehabilitation treatments could lead to a
better shared understanding of rehabilitation interventions (Dijkers,
2014). Hence, a rehabilitation treatment ontology (RTO) of
rehabilitation terms, as the terms represent the concepts and
knowledge of the domain (Sowa, 2000), should ease the
dissemination of treatments to communicate about them clearly and
effectively, through a shared understanding.
To enable building the RTO, we need to define both the
terms that we wish to be in the ontology and those that
should not. Some ontologies have extremely well-defined scopes,
such as the Karyotype ontology (Warrender and Lord, 2013),
which is an ontological representation of a previously defined
informal specification. Others, such as the mitochondrial disease
ontology (Warrender, 2015) relate to a specific area of knowledge,
or like the Gene Ontology(GO) (Ashburner et al., 2000) to a broad
area, but at a specific granularity. For the RTO, unfortunately, the
breadth of the area means that we lack this clear statement of scope.
Of course, there has been significant research on ontology
learning, enabling either automation or semi-automation of the
ontology construction process (Buitelaar et al., 2005). For the RTO,
we aim to use a semi-automated approach, combined with a highly
programmatic, pattern-driven ontology construction methodology
that we have pioneered previously with the mitochondrial disease
ontology (Warrender and Lord, 2015): this separates terms out
into a scaffold generated automatically, often from a pre-existing
structured source such as a database. This is followed by manual
refinement using the vocabulary provided this scaffold.
With the RTO, we plan to extend this ontology construction
methodology: first, we will build a corpus of appropriate literature
that will define the scope of the ontology; then we can use this
to extract a set of representative terms and phrases; finally, we
will use these terms and phrases as the basis for our ontological
scaffold (Warrender and Lord, 2015). This should provide both
coverage and scope for our ontology, which we can then refine
and build further either manually or through the addition of further
scaffolded terms, identified during the first phase of development.
We have previously used a similar methodology to ensure good
1
Halawani et al
coverage and define the scope of MITAP, a minimum information
model (Lord et al., 2016).
This leaves us with the problem of defining an appropriate
corpus of literature for the RTO. This corpus needs to cover the
domain adequately; at the same time, we would like this corpus
to be reflective of opinions of a wider community than the experts
involved it its construction. This is a common problem with
ontology development: if the scope is too narrow, the ontology will
fulfil the needs of only a few; if it is too broad, the ontology will
either get large or only have general terms.
The aim of this article is to investigate different semi-automated
methods and search strategies to retrieve a corpus with a high level
of accuracy and coverage with respect to the communities needs for
the RTO. The accuracy and coverage of a corpus are its precision
and recall, respectively, in relation to the scope of rehabilitation. We
describe four different techniques that we have used all based around
use of PubMed, and describe their advantages and disadvantages.
2
METHODS
For this work, we have used PubMed exclusively to define our
corpus. As a corpus, PubMed is far from ideal. While it contains
many papers about rehabilitation, they are mostly written from an
academic perspective and may make a different use of vocabulary
from the clinicians. A significant percentage of the papers in
PubMed have only abstracts accessible (although, under UK law,
we may be able to access full text by other means (gre, 2014)).
However, it has other significant advantages: it is freely available;
there are no patient confidentiality restrictions as there would be
with medical records; finally, it has a good API and is easy to access
computationally.
We use two additional features of PubMed in this paper. First,
papers are annotated with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).
MeSH is a thesaurus organised into a hierarchy; searches with a
single term, also search the transitive closure of that term. Curators
can also define a MeSH annotation as the “major term” or MAJR.
Secondly, PubMed provides a similar articles functionality (PMSA),
based on text similarity ( U.S. National Library of Medicine
(NLM), 2017). Currently, this functionality only allows retrieving
MEDLINE records (i.e. PubMed citation) similar to a single userselected record. We discuss this limitation later.
Additional search functionality described in this paper was
implemented using Python, exploiting the Entrez module of
BioPython (Cock et al., 2009).
2.1
Forming a Corpus
The simplest approach to generating a suitable corpus is a
keyword search. We tried this for RTO, searching with the
term “rehabilitation”. This naive approach does not work well,
as it misses many papers which contain the same stem but
with a different ending (such as “rehabilitate” or “rehabilitator”).
Moreover, it retrieves many less relevant results (for example, those
relating to drug rehabilitation).
Our next approach is to use MeSH or MAJR terms. PubMed’s
search engine automatically searches the transitive closure of any
MeSH term given, therefore searches with “Rehabilitation” will
also search “Physical Therapy Modalities”, as can be seen in
figure 1.
2
Fig. 1. “Rehabilitation” MeSH term with some of its narrower terms
Clearly searching for “Rehabilitation” as the MAJR term will
produce a result which is an exact subset of searching for the
equivalent MeSH term. In fact, the simple search approach
automatically incorporates MeSH search, as PubMed’s search
engine translates search terms to its equivalent MeSH term if it
exists. For example, the term “Physiotherapy” is translated to the
“Physical Therapy Modalities” MeSH term.
MeSH search approach also runs the risk of missing papers
which have not been annotated at all, or have been annotated with
alternative terms from MeSH.
To address this latter problem, we have tried query expansion.
Here, we expand the transitive closure of the MeSH term, then add
alternative endings manually. Sub-terms, more specifically narrower
terms, of “rehabilitation” were extracted using “MeSH SPARQL”
tool 1 . The following SPARQL query was used:
PREFIX r d f s : <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf- schema#>
PREFIX meshv : <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#>
PREFIX mesh : <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/>
SELECT ? l a b e l
FROM <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh>
WHERE {
? t e r m meshv : b r o a d e r D e s c r i p t o r + mesh : D012046 .
? term r d f s : l a b e l ? l a b e l .
}
We collected and filtered general terms used in other domains
such as “Yoga” and “Massage” by inspection. These are mostly
the ones without medical words such as rehabilitation or therapy.
Synonyms of the term “rehabilitation” were defined by consultation
with a domain expert: specifically, “restoration” and “recovery”.
Multiple variations of these words were determined manually using
a dictionary. Variations of the words “therapy”, “rehabilitation”
include “therapies”, “therapist” and “rehabilitant”. rehabilitated,
and were injected in the query. Finally, the collected general terms
were combined into a MeSH approach query, the rest of the terms
were combined into a query that is disjunctive between noun phrases
and their variants. For example, the term “physical therapy” was
converted to:
P h y s i c a l t h e r a p y OR P h y s i c a l AND
( t h e r a p y OR t h e r a p i e s OR t h e r a p i s t OR t h e r a p i s t s OR t h e r a p e u t i c OR . . .
OR
r e h a b i l i t a t i o n OR r e h a b i l i t a t e OR r e h a b i l i t a t o r OR . . .
OR
r e s t o r a t i o n OR r e s t o r e OR . . .
OR
r e c o v e r y OR . . . )
The two queries were combined to form the expanded query.The
result of this approach subsumes the results of the two previous
approaches. Thus, this approach provides the most coverage. In
fact, we retrieved around 2.9 million MEDLINE records using the
1
MeSH SPARQL is available at https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/query
Using Literature to Define Biomedical Ontologies’ Scope
query expansion approach. Table 1 shows the search terms for each
approach along with the number of retrieved records.
Search Strategy
Query Search Term(s)
Simple
MeSH
MAJR
Query expansion
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation [MeSH]
Rehabilitation [MAJR]
The expanded query
(as explained in the example)
Number of
retrieved records
512,901
258,541
156,038
2,880,858
Table 1. Search terms and the number of retrieved MEDLINE records for
each of the three search approaches
The query expansion search approach provides a significant
increase in the number of records. We tested the accuracy of the
approach by random selection of papers, followed by expert analysis
to determine whether the papers were in scope. Unfortunately, the
accuracy of this approach appears fairly low, with around 5% of the
papers considered in scope.
Finally, we have pioneered a relative similarity measure. This
builds on PubMed’s existing article similarity score, and allows us
to define similarity to a set of articles. Retrieved records are ranked
with a relatively score which is calculated as follows:
relativity score(a) =
#similar articles(a) that are in s
max(#s, #similar articles(a))
where s : seed set, a : article (i.e. M EDLIN E record)
From this equation, for a record to have a relativity score of 1.0,
all of its similar records need to cover all of the records in the seed
set. In other words, a record can only have a relativity score of 1.0
if its set of similar records is equivalent to the seed set. If it has a
similar record that is not in the seed set or if there is a record in the
seed set that is not similar to it, the relativity score will be less than
1.0. Thus, for higher scores, a record not only must be similar to
more records in the seed set, but also needs to have fewer similar
records out of the seed set.
Figure 2 shows an example of this approach. There are 3 seed
MEDLINE records (i.e. records). The relativity score for the node
D is 1.0 , as all of its similar records are in the seed set. Below are
some of the other records scores:
1
3
2
relativity score(G) =
3
3
relativity score(K) =
8
Although K, like D, is similar to all the records in the seed set,
unlike D, its score is lower than that of G as it has more similarity
with other records out of the seed set. Records with higher scores
can be considered as more relatively similar to the seed set. A
significant advantage of this approach is that the result is continuous
and can be thresholded according to contain more or less papers as
required.
Fig. 2. An example for relatively similar records approach. The green
nodes represent the seed set of MEDLINE records (i.e. records), the yellow
ones represent similar records, the red ones represent records similar to the
yellow nodes records and the edges represent PubMed’s similarity relation,
which is symmetric.
After achieving a maximal set of citations covering the topic, a
minimal accurate set was provided by a domain expert. The expert
set of articles was provided as an EndNote library file. We converted
the articles in the library file to PMIDs. We can test the coverage of
the maximal set by checking whether it subsumes the minimal set.
In fact, all of the articles provided by the expert were included in the
maximal set.
Now, we can use this approach to retrieve relatively similar
articles from the experts seed set, i.e. the minimal set. The retrieved
articles that are not included in the maximal set are filtered to restrict
similar articles that are out of the maximal set’s scope. The expert,
then, can set a threshold score to select the most related articles.
The articles above the threshold, or ones chosen by the expert, can
then be added to the seed set to perform the process again. This
process can be repeated iteratively with the help of the expert until
the results are satisfying or until they converge. The choice of the
threshold might partly depend on the required number of retrieved
articles, especially in the final stages. This process is depicted in
Figure 3.
relativity score(E) =
Fig. 3. The process of retrieving a suitable corpus that is relatively similar
to a seed corpus provided by the expert in EndNote library format.
3
CONCLUSION
In this article, we described four complementary search strategies to
retrieve an accurate and covering corpus of PubMed records for the
3
Halawani et al
topic of rehabilitation. We use this approach to ensure that we have
a covering and unbiased corpus. Of the approaches tried, the simple
search and MeSH based strategies were too restrictive, the expanded
query too broad. To address these issues, we have developed a
new measure for paper similarity which enables us to select papers
similar to a group of papers. This approach enables us to threshold
arbitrarily and define for ourselves the “Goldilocks” zone.
The key advantage of this technique is that it requires relatively
little from the domain expert, beyond a set of references
to appropriate papers, something that most researchers will
have through their normal bibliography management facilities.
Operationally, this technique is also straight-forward as it works
on PubMed similarity (although it generalises to any similarity
measure), and can operate directly over PubMed’s normal search
facilities. This avoids the necessity of performing bespoke analysis
over the whole of PubMed locally.
A significant advantage of this technique is that it works on
PubMed similarity (although it could work on any pair-wise
similarity metric), which makes it easy to perform. We can envisage
perhaps richer techniques that generalize the current over PubMed’s
similar articles approach. However, until and unless these are
directly supported by PubMed, they would require warehousing
PubMed locally. For the next step, we plan to use this corpus
to define a covering set of terms for the Rehabilitation Therapy
Ontology, using inverse document frequency statitics that we have
previously used to define the scope of a minimum information
model (Lord et al., 2016).
We note that this approach is largely independent of domain.
We do not require a suitable MeSH term, or a pre-existing set of
keywords that can be used for querying. It raises the possibility of
moving the initial knowledge capture stage of ontology development
away from expert user groups and competency questions, toward
4
an approach which is more data-driven, embedding ontology
development in the explosion of interest in big data analytics that
have characterised the last few years.
REFERENCES
(2014). Exceptions to copyright - gov.uk.
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis,
A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000). Gene ontology: tool for
the unification of biology. Nature genetics, 25(1), 25.
Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., and Magnini, B. (2005). Ontology learning from text:
methods, evaluation and applications, volume 123. IOS press.
Cock, P. J., Antao, T., Chang, J. T., Chapman, B. A., Cox, C. J., Dalke, A., Friedberg,
I., Hamelryck, T., Kauff, F., Wilczynski, B., et al. (2009). Biopython: freely
available python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics.
Bioinformatics, 25(11), 1422–1423.
Dijkers, M. P. (2014). Rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: establishing common
ground. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 95(1), S1–S5.
Lord, P., Spiering, R., Aguillon, J. C., Anderson, A. E., Appel, S., Benitez-Ribas,
D., ten Brinke, A., Broere, F., Cools, N., Cuturi, M. C., et al. (2016). Minimum
information about tolerogenic antigen-presenting cells (mitap): a first step towards
reproducibility and standardisation of cellular therapies. PeerJ, 4, e2300.
Sowa, J. F. (2000). Ontology, metadata, and semiotics. In International Conference on
Conceptual Structures, pages 55–81. Springer.
U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) (2017). Pubmed tutorial - similar articles.
van Heugten, C., Wolters Gregório, G., and Wade, D. (2012). Evidence-based
cognitive rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: a systematic review of content
of treatment. Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 22(5), 653–673.
Warrender, J. D. (2015). The consistent representation of scientific knowledge:
investigations into the ontology of karyotypes and mitochondria.
Warrender, J. D. and Lord, P. (2013). The karyotype ontology: a computational
representation for human cytogenetic patterns. arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.3758.
Warrender, J. D. and Lord, P. (2015). Scaffolding the mitochondrial disease ontology
from extant knowledge sources. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.04114.
Whyte, J., Dijkers, M. P., Hart, T., Zanca, J. M., Packel, A., Ferraro, M., and
Tsaousides, T. (2014). Development of a theory-driven rehabilitation treatment
taxonomy: conceptual issues. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation,
95(1), S24–S32.
| 2cs.AI
|
Improving and extending the testing of distributions for
shape-restricted properties
arXiv:1609.06736v1 [cs.CC] 21 Sep 2016
Eldar Fischer∗
Oded Lachish
†
Yadu Vasudev
‡
September 23, 2016
Abstract
Distribution testing deals with what information can be deduced about an unknown distribution over {1, . . . , n}, where the algorithm is only allowed to obtain a relatively small number
of independent samples from the distribution. In the extended conditional sampling model, the
algorithm is also allowed to obtain samples from the restriction of the original distribution on
subsets of {1, . . . , n}.
In 2015, Canonne, Diakonikolas, Gouleakis and Rubinfeld unified several previous results,
and showed that for any property of distributions satisfying a “decomposability” criterion, there
exists an algorithm (in the basic model) that can distinguish with high probability distributions
satisfying the property from distributions that are far from it in the variation distance.
We present here a more efficient yet simpler algorithm for the basic model, as well as very
efficient algorithms for the conditional model, which until now was not investigated under the
umbrella of decomposable properties. Additionally, we provide an algorithm for the conditional
model that handles a much larger class of properties.
Our core mechanism is a way of efficiently producing an interval-partition of {1, . . . , n} that
satisfies a “fine-grain” quality. We show that with such a partition at hand we can directly move
forward with testing individual intervals, instead of first searching for the “correct” partition of
{1, . . . , n}.
1
Introduction
1.1
Historical background
In most computational problems that arise from modeling real-world situations, we are required to
analyze large amounts of data to decide if it has a fixed property. The amount of data involved
is usually too large for reading it in its entirety, both with respect to time and storage. In such
situations, it is natural to ask for algorithms that can sample points from the data and obtain a
significant estimate for the property of interest. The area of property testing addresses this issue
by studying algorithms that look at a small part of the data and then decide if the object that
generated the data has the property or is far (according to some metric) from having the property.
There has been a long line of research, especially in statistics, where the underlying object from
which we obtain the data is modeled as a probability distribution. Here the algorithm is only
∗
Faculty of Computer Science, Israel Institute of Technology (Technion), Haifa, Israel. [email protected]
Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK. [email protected]
‡
Faculty of Computer Science, Israel Institute of Technology (Technion), Haifa, Israel. [email protected]
†
1
allowed to ask for independent samples from the distribution, and has to base its decision on them.
If the support of the underlying probability distribution is large, it is not practical to approximate
the entire distribution. Thus, it is natural to study this problem in the context of property testing.
The specific sub-area of property testing that is dedicated to the study of distributions is called
distribution testing. There, the input is a probability distribution (in this paper the domain is the
set {1, 2, . . . , n}) and the objective is to distinguish whether the distribution has a certain property,
such as uniformity or monotonicity, or is far in ℓ1 distance from it. See [Can15] for a survey about
the realm of distribution testing.
Testing properties of distributions was studied by Batu et al in [BFR+ 00], where they gave a
sublinear query algorithm for testing closeness of distributions supported over the set {1, 2, . . . , n}.
They extended the idea of collision counting, which was implicitly used for uniformity testing in the
work of Goldreich and Ron ([GR00]). Consequently, various properties of probability distributions
were studied, like testing identity with a known distribution ([BFF+ 01, VV14, ADK15, DK16]),
testing independence of a distribution over a product space ([BFF+ 01, ADK15]), and testing k-wise
independence ([AAK+ 07]).
In recent years, distribution testing has been extended beyond the classical model. A new model
called the conditional sampling model was introduced. It first appeared independently in [CRS15]
and [CFGM13]. In the conditional sampling model, the algorithm queries the input distribution µ
with a set S ⊆ {1, 2, . . . , n}, and gets an index sampled according to µ conditioned on the set S.
Notice that if S = {1, 2, . . . , n}, then this is exactly like in the standard model. The conditional
sampling model allows adaptive querying of µ, since we can choose the set S based on the indexes
sampled until now. Chakraborty et al ([CFGM13]) and Canonne et al ([CRS15]) showed that
testing uniformity can be done with a number of queries not depending on n (the latter presenting
an optimal test), and investigated the testing of other properties of distributions. In [CFGM13], it
is also shown that uniformity can be tested with poly(log n) conditional samples by a non-adaptive
algorithm. In this work, we study the distribution testing problem in the standard (unconditional)
sampling model, as well as in the conditional model.
A line of work which is central to our paper, is the testing of distributions for structure. The
objective is to test whether a given distribution has some structural properties like being monotone
([BKR04]), being a k-histogram ([ILR12, DK16]), or being log-concave ([ADK15]). Canonne et al
([CDGR15]) unified these results to show that if a property of distributions has certain structural
characteristics, then membership in the property can be tested efficiently using samples from the
distribution. More precisely, they introduced the notion of L-decomposable distributions as a way
to unify various algorithms for testing distributions for structure. Informally, an L-decomposable
distribution µ supported over {1, 2, . . . , n} is one that has an interval partition I of {1, 2, . . . , n}
of size bounded by L, such that for every interval I, either the weight of µ on it is small or the
distribution over the interval is close to uniform. A property C of distributions is L-decomposable if
every distribution µ ∈ C is L-decomposable (L is allowed to depend on n). This generalizes various
properties of distributions like being monotone, unimodal, log-concave etc. In this setting, their
result for a set of distributions C supported over {1, 2, . . . , n} translates to the following: if every
distribution µ from C is L-decomposable, then there is an efficient algorithm for testing whether a
given distribution belongs to the property C.
To achieve their results, Canonne et al ([CDGR15]) show that if a distribution µ supported
over [n] is L-decomposable, then it is O(L log n)-decomposable where the intervals are of the form
[j2i + 1, (j + 1)2i ]. This presents a natural approach of computing the interval partition in a
2
recursive manner, by bisecting an interval if it has a large probability weight and is not close to
uniform. Once they get an interval partition, they learn the “flattening” of the distribution over
this partition, and check if this distribution is close to the property C. The term “flattening”
refers to the distribution resulting from making µ conditioned on any interval of the partition to
be uniform. When applied to a partition corresponding to a decomposition of the distribution, the
learned flattening is also close to the original distribution. Because of this, in the case where there
is a promise that µ is L-decomposable, the above can be viewed as a learning algorithm, where
they obtain an explicit distribution that is close to µ. Without the promise it can be viewed as an
agnostic learning algorithm. For further elaboration of this connection see [Dia16].
1.2
Results and techniques
In this paper, we extend the body of knowledge about testing L-decomposable properties. We
improve upon the previously known bound on the sample complexity, and give much better bounds
when conditional samples are allowed. Additionally, for the conditional model, we provide a test
for a broader family of properties, that we call atlas-characterizable properties.
Our approach differs from that of [CDGR15] in the manner in which we compute the interval partition. We show that a partition where most intervals that are not singletons have small
probability weight is sufficient to learn the distribution µ, even though it is not the original Ldecomposition of µ. We show that if a distribution µ is L-decomposable, then the “flattening” of
µ with respect to a this partition is close to µ. It turns out that such a partition can be obtained
in “one shot” without resorting to a recursive search procedure.
We obtain a partition as above using a method of partition pulling that we develop here.
Informally, a pulled partition is obtained by sampling indexes from µ, and taking the partition
induced by the samples in the following way: each sampled index is a singleton interval, and the
rest of the partition is composed of the maximal intervals between sampled indexes. Apart from
the obvious simplicity of this procedure, it also has the advantage of providing a partition with a
significantly smaller number of intervals, linear in L for a fixed ǫ, and with no dependency on n
unless L itself depends on it. This makes our algorithm more efficient in query complexity than the
one of [CDGR15] in the unconditional sampling model, and leads to a dramatically small sampling
complexity in the (adaptive) conditional model.
Another feature of the partition pulling method is that it provides a partition with small weight
intervals also when the distribution is not L-decomposable. This allows us to use the partition
in a different manner later on, in the algorithm for testing atlas characterizable properties using
conditional samples.
The main common ground between our approach for L-decomposable properties and that of
[CDGR15] is the method of testing by implicit learning, as defined formally in [DLM+ 07] (see
[Ser10]). In particular, the results also provide a means to learn a distribution close to µ if µ satisfies
the tested property. We also provide a test under the conditional query model for the extended
class of atlas characterizable properties that we define below, which generalizes both decomposable
properties and symmetric properties. A learning algorithm for this class is not provided; only an
“atlas” of the input distribution rather than the distribution itself
√ is learned.
Our result for unconditional testing (Theorem 7.4) gives a nL/poly(ǫ) query algorithm in the
standard (unconditional) sampling model for testing an L-decomposable property of distributions.
Our method of finding a good partition for µ using pulled partitions, that we explained above,
avoids the log n factor present in Theorem 3.3 of [CDGR15]. We also avoid the additional O(L2 )
3
additive term present there. The same method enables us to extend our results to the conditional
query model, which we present for both adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms. Table 1 summarizes
our results and compares them with known lower bounds1 .
Table 1: Summary of our results
L-decomposable
Unconditional
Adaptive conditional
Non-adaptive conditional
k-characterized by atlases
Adaptive conditional
2
Result
(testing
and learning)
√
nL/poly(ǫ)
L/poly(ǫ)
L · poly(log n, 1/ǫ)
(testing)
k · poly(log n, 1/ǫ)
Known lower bound
√
Ω( n/ǫ2 ) for L = 1 [Pan08]
Ω(L) for some fixed ǫ [CFGM13]
Ω(log n) for L = 1 and some fixed ǫ
[ACK15]
√
Ω( log log n) for k = 1, and some
fixed ǫ [CFGM13]
Preliminaries
We denote the set {1, . . . , n} by [n].
We study the problem of testing properties of probability distributions supported over [n], when
given samples from the distribution. For two distributions
µ and χ, we say that µ is ǫ-far from
P
χ if they are far in the ℓ1 norm, that is, d(µ, χ) =
i∈[n] |µ(i) − χ(i)| > ǫ. For a property of
distributions C, we say that µ is ǫ-far from C if for all χ ∈ C, d(µ, χ) > ǫ.
Outside the ℓ1 norm between distributions, we also use the ℓ∞ norm, kµ−χk∞ = maxi∈[n] |µ(i)−
χ(i)|, and the following measure for uniformity.
Definition 2.1. For a distribution µ over a domain I, we define the bias of µ to be bias(µ) =
maxi∈I µ(i)/ mini∈I µ(i) − 1.
The following observation is easy and will be used implicitly throughout.
Observation 2.2. For any two distributions µ and χ over a domain I of size m, d(µ, χ) ≤
1
mkµ − χk∞ . Also, kµ − UI k∞ ≤ m
bias(µ), where UI denotes the uniform distribution over I.
Proof. Follows from the definitions.
We study the problem, both in the standard model, where the algorithm is given indexes
sampled from the distribution, as well as in the model of conditional samples. The conditional
model was first studied in the independent works of Chakraborty et al ([CFGM13]) and Canonne
et al ([CRS15]). We first give the definition of a conditional oracle for a distribution µ.
1
The lower bounds for unconditional and non-adaptive conditional testing of L-decomposable properties with
L = 1 are exactly the lower bounds for uniformity testing; the lower bound for adaptive conditional testing follows
easily from the proved existence of properties that have no sub-linear complexity adaptive conditional tests; finally,
the lower bound for properties k-characterized by atlases with k = 1 is just a bound for a symmetric property
constructed there. About the last one, we conjecture that there exist properties with much higher lower bounds.
4
Definition 2.3 (Conditional oracle). A conditional oracle to a distribution µ supportedP
over [n] is
a black-box that takes as input a set A ⊆ [n], samples a point i ∈ A with probability µ(i)/ j∈A µ(j),
and returns i. If µ(j) = 0 for all j ∈ A, then it chooses i ∈ A uniformly at random.
Remark. The behaviour of the conditional oracle on sets A with µ(A) = 0 is as per the model
of Chakraborty et al [CFGM13]. However, upper bounds in this model also hold in the model of
Canonne et al [CRS15], and most lower bounds can be easily converted to it.
Now we define conditional distribution testing algorithms. We will define and analyze both
adaptive and non-adaptive conditional testing algorithms.
Definition 2.4. An adaptive conditional distribution testing algorithm for a property of distributions C, with parameters ǫ, δ > 0, and n ∈ N, with query complexity q(ǫ, δ, n), is a randomized
algorithm with access to a conditional oracle of a distribution µ with the following properties:
• For each i ∈ [q], at the ith phase, the algorithm generates a set Ai ⊆ [n], based on j1 , j2 , · · · , ji−1
and its internal coin tosses, and calls the conditional oracle with Ai to receive an element ji ,
drawn independently of j1 , j2 , · · · , ji−1 .
• Based on the received elements j1 , j2 , · · · , jq and its internal coin tosses, the algorithm accepts
or rejects the distribution µ.
If µ ∈ C, then the algorithm accepts with probability at least 1 − δ, and if µ is ǫ-far from C, then
the algorithm rejects with probability at least 1 − δ.
Definition 2.5. A non-adaptive conditional distribution testing algorithm for a property of distributions C, with parameters ǫ, δ > 0, and n ∈ N, with query complexity q(ǫ, δ, n), is a randomized
algorithm with access to a conditional oracle of a distribution µ with the following properties:
• The algorithm chooses sets A1 , . . . , Aq (not necessarily distinct) based on its internal coin
tosses, and then queries the conditional oracle to respectively obtain j1 , . . . , jq .
• Based on the received elements j1 , . . . , jq and its internal coin tosses, the algorithm accepts
or rejects the distribution µ.
If µ ∈ C, then the algorithm accepts with probability at least 1 − δ, and if µ is ǫ-far from C, then
the algorithm rejects with probability at least 1 − δ.
2.1
Large deviation bounds
The following large deviation bounds will be used in the analysis of our algorithms through the
rest of the paper.
Lemma 2.6 (Chernoff
P bounds). Let X1 , X2 , . . . , Xm be independent random variables taking values
in {0, 1}. Let X = i∈[m] Xi . Then for any δ ∈ (0, 1], we have the following bounds.
2
−δ E[X]
.
1. Pr[X > (1 + δ)E[X]] ≤ exp
3
2. Pr[X < (1 − δ)E[X]] ≤ exp
−δ2 E[X]
2
.
5
When δ ≥ 1, we have Pr[X ≥ (1 + δ)E[X]] < exp( −δE[X]
).
3
Lemma 2.7 (Hoeffding bounds [Hoe]). LetP
X1 , X2 , . . . , Xm be independent
random
variables such
1
−
E[X]|
>
ǫ
≤
2
exp −2mǫ2
X
.
Then
Pr
|X
that 0 ≤ Xi ≤ 1 for i ∈ [m], and let X = m
i∈[m] i
2.2
Basic distribution procedures
The following is a folklore result about learning any distribution supported over [n], that we prove
here for completeness.
Lemma 2.8 (Folklore). Let µ be a distribution supported over [n]. Using n+log(2/δ)
unconditional
2ǫ2
′
samples from µ, we can obtain an explicit distribution µ supported on [n] such that, with probability
at least 1 − δ, d(µ, µ′ ) ≤ ǫ.
samples from µ, and for each i ∈ [n], let mi be the number of times i
Proof. Take m = n+log(2/δ)
2ǫ2
was sampled. Define µ′ (i) = mi /m. Now, we show that maxS⊆[n] |µ(S) − µ′ (S)| ≤ ǫ/2. The lemma
follows from this since the ℓ1 distance is equal to twice this amount.
For any set S ⊆ [n], let X1 , X2 , . . . , Xm be random
variables such that Xj = 1 if the j th sample
1 P
was in S, and otherwise Xj = 0. Let X = m j∈[m] Xj . Then, X = µ′ (S) and E[X] = µ(S).
2
By Lemma 2.7, Pr[|X − E[X]| > ǫ/2] ≤ 2e−2mǫ . Substituting for m, we get that Pr[|µ′ (S) −
µ(S)| > ǫ/2] ≤ 2e−n−log(2/δ) . Taking a union bound over all sets, with probability at least 1 − δ,
|µ′ (S) − µ(S)| ≤ ǫ/2 for every S ⊆ [n]. Therefore, d(µ, µ′ ) ≤ ǫ.
We also have the following simple lemma about learning a distribution in ℓ∞ distance.
Lemma 2.9. Let µ be a distribution supported over [n]. Using log(2n/δ)
unconditional samples from
2ǫ2
µ, we can obtain an explicit distribution µ′ supported on [n] such that, with probability at least 1− δ,
kµ − µ′ k∞ ≤ ǫ.
samples from µ, and for each i ∈ [n], let mi be the number of times i
Proof. Take m = log(2n/δ)
2ǫ2
was sampled. For each i ∈ [n], define µ′ (i) = mi /m.
th sample
For an index i ∈ [n], let X1 , X2 , . . . , X
m be random variables such that Xj = 1 if the j
P
1
′
is i, and otherwise Xj = 0. Let X = m
j∈[m] Xj . Then X = µ (i) and E[X] = µ(i). By Lemma
2
2.7, Pr[|X − E[X]| > ǫ] ≤ 2e−2mǫ . Substituting for m, we get that Pr[|µ(i) − µ′ (i)| > ǫ] ≤ δ/n.
By a union bound over [n], with probability at least 1 − δ, |µ(i) − µ′ (i)| ≤ ǫ for every i ∈ [n].
3
Fine partitions and how to pull them
We define the notion of η-fine partitions of a distribution µ supported over [n], which are central
to all our algorithms.
Definition 3.1 (η-fine interval partition). Given a distribution µ over [n], an η-fine interval partition of µ is an interval-partition I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Ir ) of [n] such that for all j ∈ [r], µ(Ij ) ≤ η,
excepting the case |Ij | = 1. The length |I| of an interval partition I is the number of intervals in
it.
6
Algorithm 1: Pulling an η-fine partition
Input: Distribution µ supported over [n], parameters η > 0 (fineness) and δ > 0 (error
probability)
3
3
1 Take m = η log ηδ unconditional samples from µ
2
3
4
5
6
7
Arrange the indices sampled in increasing order i1 < i2 < · · · < ir without repetition and set
i0 = 0
for each j ∈ [r] do
if ij > ij−1 + 1 then add the interval {ij−1 + 1, . . . , ij − 1} to I
Add the singleton interval {ij } to I
if ir < n then add the interval {ir + 1, . . . , n} to I
return I
The following Algorithm 1 is the pulling mechanism. The idea is to take independent unconditional samples from µ, make them into singleton intervals in our interval-partition I, and then
take the intervals between these samples as the remaining intervals in I.
Lemma 3.2. Let µ be a distribution that is supported over [n], and η, δ > 0, and suppose that
these are fed to Algorithm 1. Then, with probability at least 1− δ, the
set
of intervals I returned
1
1
by Algorithm 1 is an η-fine interval partition of µ of length O η log ηδ .
Proof. Let I the set of intervals returned by Algorithm 1. The guarantee on the length of I follows
from the number of samples taken in Step 1, noting that |I| ≤ 2r − 1 = O(m).
Let J be a maximal set of pairwise disjoint minimal intervals I in [n], such that µ(I) ≥ η/3
for every interval I ∈ J . Note that every i for which µ(i) ≥ η/3 necessarily appears as a singleton
interval {i} ∈ J . Also clearly |J | ≤ 3/η.
We shall first show that if an interval I ′ is such that µ(I ′ ) ≥ η, then it fully contains some
interval I ∈ J . Then, we shall show that, with probability at least 1 − δ, the samples taken in
Step 1 include an index from every interval I ∈ J . By Steps 2 to 6 of the algorithm and the above,
this implies the statement of the lemma.
Let I ′ be an interval such that µ(I ′ ) ≥ η, and assume on the contrary that it contains no
interval from J . Clearly it may intersect without containing at most two intervals Il , Ir ∈ J . Also,
µ(I ′ ∩ Il ) < η/3 because otherwise we could have replaced Il with I ′ ∩ Il in J , and the same holds
for µ(I ′ ∩ Ir ). But this means that µ(I \ (Il ∪ Ir )) > η/3, and so we could have added I \ (Il ∪ Ir )
to J , again a contradiction.
Let I ∈ J . The probability that an index from I is not sampled is at most (1−η/3)3 log(3/ηδ)/η ≤
δη/3. By a union bound over all I ∈ J , with probability at least 1 − δ the samples taken in Step 1
include an index from every interval in J .
The following is a definition of a variation of a fine partition, where we allow some intervals of
small total weight to violate the original requirements.
Definition 3.3 ((η, γ)-fine partitions). Given a distributionPµ over [n], an (η, γ)-fine interval
partition is an interval partition I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Ir ) such that I∈HI µ(I) ≤ γ, where HI is the set
of violating intervals {I ∈ I : µ(I) > η, |I| > 1}.
7
In our applications, γ will be larger than η by a factor of L, which would allow us through the following Algorithm 2 to avoid having additional log L factors in our expressions for the unconditional
and the adaptive tests.
Algorithm 2: Pulling an (η, γ)-fine partition
Input: Distribution µ supported over [n], parameters η, γ > 0 (fineness) and δ > 0 (error
probability)
3
5
1 Take m = η log γδ unconditional samples from µ
2
3
Perform Step 2 through Step 6 of Algorithm 1.
return I
Lemma 3.4. Let µ be a distribution that is supported over [n], and γ, η, δ > 0, and suppose that
these are fed to Algorithm 2. Then, with probability at least 1 − δ, the set
ofintervals I returned
1
1
.
by Algorithm 2 is an (η, γ)-fine interval partition of µ of length O η log γδ
Proof. Let I the set of intervals returned by Algorithm 2. The guarantee on the length of I follows
from the number of samples taken in Step 1.
As in the proof of Lemma 3.2, Let J be a maximal set of pairwise disjoint minimal intervals
I in [n], such that µ(I) ≥ η/3Sfor every interval I ∈ J . Here, also define the set J ′ to be the set
of maximal intervals in [n] \ I∈J I. Note now that J ∪ J ′ is an interval partition of [n]. Note
also that between every two consecutive intervals of J ′ lies an interval of J . Finally, since J is
maximal, all intervals in J ′ are of weights less than η/3.
Recalling the definition H = {I ∈ I : µ(I) > η, |I| > 1}, as in the proof of Lemma 1 every I ′ ∈ H
must fully contain an interval from J from which no point was sampled. Moreover, I ′ may not
fully contain intervals from J from which any points were sampled.
Note furthermore that the weight of such an I ′ is not more than 5 times the total weight of the
intervals in J that it fully contains. To see this, recall that the at most two intervals from J that
intersect I ′ without containing it have intersections of weight not more than η/3. Also, there may
be the intervals of J ′ intersecting I ′ , each of weight at most η/3. However, because there is an
interval J between any two consecutive intervals of J ′ , the number of intervals from J ′ intersecting
I ′ is at most 1 more than the number of intervals of J fully contained in I ′ . Thus the number of
intersecting intervals from J ∪ J ′ is not more than 5 times the number of fully contained intervals
from J , and together with their weight bounds we get the bound on µ(I ′ ).
Let I ∈ J . The probability that an index from I is not sampled is at most (1−η/3)3 log(5/γδ)/η ≤
δγ/5. By applying the Markov bound over all I ∈ J (along with their weights), with probability
at least 1 − δ the samples taken in Step 1 include an index from every interval
P in J but at most a
subset of them of total weight at most γ/5. By the above this means that I∈H µ(I) ≤ γ.
4
Handling decomposable distributions
The notion of L-decomposable distributions was defined and studied in [CDGR15]. They showed
that a large class of properties, such as monotonicity and log-concavity, are L-decomposable. We
now formally define L-decomposable distributions and properties, as given in [CDGR15].
8
Definition 4.1 ((γ, L)-decomposable distributions [CDGR15]). For an integer L, a distribution µ
supported over [n] is (γ, L)-decomposable, if there exists an interval partition I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Iℓ ) of
[n], where ℓ ≤ L, such that for all j ∈ [ℓ], at least one of the following holds.
1. µ(Ij ) ≤
γ
L.
2. maxi∈Ij µ(i) ≤ (1 + γ) mini∈Ij µ(i).
The second condition in the definition of a (γ, L)-decomposable distribution is identical to saying
that bias(µ ↾Ij ) ≤ γ. An L-decomposable property is now defined in terms of all its members being
decomposable distributions.
Definition 4.2 (L-decomposable properties, [CDGR15]). For a function L : (0, 1] × N → N, we
say that a property of distributions C is L-decomposable, if for every γ > 0, and µ ∈ C supported
over [n], µ is (γ, L(γ, n))-decomposable.
Recall that part of the algorithm for learning such distributions is finding (through pulling) what
we referred to as a fine partition. Such a partition may still have intervals where the conditional
distribution over them is far from uniform. However, we shall show that for L-decomposable
distributions, the total weight of such “bad” intervals is not very high.
The next lemma shows that every fine partition of an (γ, L)-decomposable distribution has only
a small weight concentrated on “non-uniform” intervals and thus it will be sufficient to deal with
the “uniform” intervals.
Lemma 4.3. Let µ be a distribution supported over [n] which is (γ, L)-decomposable. For every
γ/L-fine interval partition I ′ = (I1′ , I2′ , . . . , Ir′ ) of µ, the following holds.
X
µ(Ij′ ) ≤ 2γ.
j∈[r]:bias(µ↾I ′ )>γ
j
Proof. Let I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Iℓ ) be the L-decomposition of µ, where ℓ ≤ L. Let I ′ = (I1′ , I2′ , . . . , Ir′ )
be an interval partition of [n] such that for all j ∈ [r], µ(Ij′ ) ≤ γ/L or |Ij′ | = 1.
Any interval Ij′ for which bias(µ ↾Ij′ ) > γ, is either completely inside an interval Ik such that
µ(Ik ) ≤ γ/L, or intersects more than one interval (and in particular |Ij′ | > 1). There are at most
L − 1 intervals in I ′ that intersect more than one interval in I. The sum of the weights of all such
intervals is at most γ.
For any interval Ik of I such that µ(Ik ) ≤ γ/L, the sum of the weights of intervals from I ′ that
lie completely inside Ik is at most γ/L. Thus, the total weight of all such intervals is bounded by
γ. Therefore, the sum of the weights of intervals Ij′ such that bias(µ ↾Ij′ ) > γ is at most 2γ.
In order to get better bounds, we will use the counterpart of this lemma for the more general
(two-parameter) notion of a fine partition.
Lemma 4.4. Let µ be a distribution supported over [n] which is (γ, L)-decomposable. For every
(γ/L, γ)-fine interval partition I ′ = (I1′ , I2′ , . . . , Ir′ ) of µ, the following holds.
X
µ(Ij′ ) ≤ 3γ.
j∈[r]:bias(µ↾I ′ )>γ
j
9
Proof. Let I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Iℓ ) be the L-decomposition of µ, where ℓ ≤ L. Let I ′ = (I1′ , I2′ , . . . , Ir′ )
be an interval partition of [n] such that for a set HI of total weight at most γ, for all Ij′ ∈ I \ HI ,
µ(Ij′ ) ≤ γ/L or |Ij′ | = 1.
Exactly as in the proof of Lemma 4.3, the total weight of intervals Ij′ ∈ I \ HI for which
bias(µ ↾Ij′ ) > γ is at most 2γ. In the worst case, all intervals in HI are also such that bias(µ ↾Ij′ ) > γ,
adding at most γ to the total weight of such intervals.
As previously mentioned, we are not learning the actual distribution but a “flattening” thereof.
We next formally define the flattening of a distribution µ with respect to an interval partition I.
Afterwards we shall describe its advantages and how it can be learned.
Definition 4.5. Given a distribution µ supported over [n] and a partition I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Iℓ ), of
[n] to intervals, the flattening of µ with respect to I is a distribution µI , supported over [n], such
that for i ∈ Ij , µI (i) = µ(Ij )/|Ij |.
The following lemma shows that the flattening of any distribution µ, with respect to any interval
partition that has only small weight on intervals far from uniform, is close to µ.
Lemma 4.6. Let µ be aPdistribution supported on [n], and let I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Ir ) be an interval
partition of µ such that j∈[r]:d(µ↾I ,UI )≥γ µ(Ij ) ≤ η. Then d(µ, µI ) ≤ γ + 2η.
j
j
Proof. We split the sum d(µ, µI ) into parts, one for Ij such that d(µ ↾Ij , UIj ) ≤ γ, and one for the
remaining intervals.
For Ij s such that d(µ ↾Ij , UIj ) ≤ γ, we have
X
i∈Ij
µ(i) −
X
µ(Ij )
1
=
µ(Ij ) µ ↾Ij (i) −
= µ(Ij )d(µ ↾Ij , UIj ) ≤ γµ(Ij ).
|Ij |
|Ij |
(1)
i∈Ij
For Ij such that d(µ ↾Ij , UIj ) > γ, we have
X
i∈Ij
µ(i) −
X
1
µ(Ij )
=
µ(Ij ) µ ↾Ij (i) −
≤ 2µ(Ij )
|Ij |
|Ij |
(2)
i∈Ij
We know that the sum of µ(Ij ) over all Ij such that d(µ ↾Ij , UIj ) ≥ γ is at most η. Using Equations
2 and 1, and summing up over all the sets Ij ∈ I, the lemma follows.
The good thing about a flattening (for an interval partition of small length) is that it can be
efficiently learned. For this we first make a technical definition and note some trivial observations:
Definition 4.7 (coarsening). Given µ and I, where |I| = ℓ, we define the coarsening of µ according
to I the distribution µ̂I over [ℓ] as by µ̂I (j) = µ(Ij ) for all j ∈ [ℓ].
Observation 4.8. Given a distribution µ̂I over [ℓ], define µI over [n] by µ(i) = µ̂I (ji )/|Iji |, where
ji is the index satisfying i ∈ Iji . This is a distribution, and for any two distributions µ̂I and χ̂I we
have d(µI , χI ) = d(µ̂I , χ̂I ). Moreover, if µ̂I is a coarsening of a distribution µ over [n], then µI is
the respective flattening of µ.
Proof. All of this follows immediately from the definitions.
10
The following lemma shows how learning can be achieved. We will ultimately use this in
conjunction with Lemma 4.6 as a means to learn a whole distribution through its flattening.
Lemma 4.9. Given a distribution µ supported over [n] and an interval partition I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Iℓ ),
, we can obtain an explicit distribution µ′I , supported over [n], such that, with
using 2(ℓ+log(2/δ))
ǫ2
probability at least 1 − δ, d(µI , µ′I ) ≤ ǫ.
Proof. First, note that an unconditional sample from µ̂I can be simulated using one unconditional
sample from µ. To obtain it, take the index i sampled from µ, and set j to be the index for which
i ∈ Ij . Using Lemma 2.8, we can now obtain a distribution µ̂′I , supported over [ℓ], such that with
probability at least 1 − δ, d(µ̂I , µ̂′I ) ≤ ǫ. To finish, we construct and output µ′I as per Observation
4.8.
5
Weakly tolerant interval uniformity tests
To unify our treatment of learning and testing with respect to L-decomposable properties to all
three models (unconditional, adaptive-condition and non-adaptive-conditional), we first define what
it means to test a distribution µ for uniformity over an interval I ⊆ [n]. The following definition
is technical in nature, but it is what we need to be used as a building block for our learning and
testing algorithms.
Definition 5.1 (weakly tolerant interval tester). A weakly tolerant interval tester is an algorithm
T that takes as input a distribution µ over [n], an interval I ⊆ [n], a maximum size parameter
m, a minimum weight parameter γ, an approximation parameter ǫ and an error parameter δ, and
satisfies the following.
1. If |I| ≤ m, µ(I) ≥ γ, and bias(µ ↾I ) ≤ ǫ/100, then the algorithm accepts with probability at
least 1 − δ.
2. If |I| ≤ m, µ(I) ≥ γ, and d(µ ↾I , UI ) > ǫ, then the algorithm rejects with probability at least
1 − δ.
In all other cases, the algorithm may accept or reject with arbitrary probability.
For our purposes we will use three weakly tolerant interval testers, one for each model.
First, a tester for uniformity which uses unconditional samples, a version of which has already
appeared implicitly in [GR00]. We state below the tester with the best dependence on n and ǫ. We
first state it in its original form, where I is the whole of [n], implying that m = n and γ = 1, and
δ = 1/3.
Lemma 5.2 ([Pan08]). For the input (µ, [n], n, 1, ǫ, 1/3), there is a weakly tolerant interval tester
√
using O( n/ǫ2 ) unconditional samples from µ.
The needed adaptation to our purpose is straightforward.
Lemma 5.3. For the input (µ, I, m, γ, ǫ, δ), there is a weakly tolerant interval tester which uses
√
O( m log(1/δ)/γǫ2 ) unconditional samples from µ.
11
Proof. To adapt the tester of Lemma 5.2 to the general m and γ, we just take samples according
to µ and keep from them those samples lie in I. This simulates samples from µ ↾I , over which
√
we employ the original tester. This gives a tester using O( m/γǫ2 ) unconditional samples and
providing an error parameter of, say, δ = 2/5 (the extra error is due to the probability of not
getting enough samples from I even when µ(I) ≥ γ). To move to a general δ, we repeat this O(1/δ)
times and take the majority vote.
Next, a tester that uses adaptive conditional samples. For this we use the following tester from
[CRS15] (see also [CFGM13]). Its original statement does not have the weakly tolerance (acceptance
for small bias) guarantee, but it is easy to see that the proof there works for the stronger assertion.
This time we skip the question of how to adapt the original algorithm from I = [n] and δ = 2/3
to the general parameters here. This is since γ does not matter (due to using adaptive conditional
samples), the query complexity is independent of the domain size to begin with, and the move to
a general δ > 0 is by standard amplification.
Lemma 5.4 ([CRS15], see also [CFGM13]). For the input (µ, I, m, γ, ǫ, δ), there is a weakly tolerant
interval tester that adaptively takes log(1/δ)poly(log(1/ǫ))/ǫ2 conditional samples from µ.
Finally, a tester that uses non-adaptive conditional samples. For this to work, it is also very
important that the queries do not depend on I as well (but only on n and γ). We just state here
the lemma, the algorithm itself is presented and analyzed in Section 8.
Lemma 5.5. For the input (µ, I, m, γ, ǫ, δ), there is a weakly tolerant interval tester that nonadaptively takes poly(log n, 1/ǫ) log(1/δ)/γ conditional samples from µ, in a manner independent
of the interval I.
6
Assessing an interval partition
Through either Lemma 3.2 or Lemma 3.4 we know how to construct a fine partition, and then
through either Lemma 4.3 or Lemma 4.4 respectively we know that if µ is decomposable, then
most of the weight is concentrated on intervals with a small bias. However, eventually we would
like a test that works for decomposable and non-decomposable distributions alike. For this we need
a way to asses an interval partition as to whether it is indeed suitable for learning a distribution.
This is done through a weighted sampling of intervals, for which we employ a weakly tolerant tester,
The following is the formal description, given as Algorithm 3.
Algorithm 3: Assessing a partition
Input: A distribution µ supported over [n], parameters c, r, an interval partition I
satisfying |I| ≤ r, parameters ǫ, δ > 0, a weakly tolerant interval uniformity tester T
taking input values (µ, I, m, γ, ǫ, δ).
1 for s = 20 log(1/δ)/ǫ times do
2
Take an unconditional sample from µ and let I ∈ I be the interval that contains it
3
Use the tester T with input values (µ, I, n/c, ǫ/r, ǫ, δ/2s)
4
if test rejects then add I to B
5
if * then |B| > 4ǫsreject else *accept
12
To analyze it, first, for a fine interval partition, we bound the total weight of intervals where
the weakly tolerant tester is not guaranteed a small error probability; recall that T as used in Step
3 guarantees a correct output only for an interval I satisfying µ(I) ≥ ǫ/r and |I| ≤ n/r.
Observation 6.1. SDefine NI = {I ∈ I : |I| > n/r or µ(I) < ǫ/r}. If I is (η, γ)-fine, where
cη + γ ≤ ǫ, then µ( I∈NI I) ≤ 2ǫ.
Proof. Intervals in NI must fall into at least one of the following categories.
• Intervals in HI , whose total weight is bounded by γ by the definition of a fine partition.
• Intervals whose weight is less than ǫ/r. Since there are at most r such intervals (since |I| ≤ r)
their total weight is bounded by ǫ.
• Intervals whose size is more than n/c and are not in HI . Every such interval is of weight
bounded by η (by the definition of a fine partition) and clearly there are no more than c of
those, giving a total weight of cη.
Summing these up concludes the proof.
The following “completeness” lemma states that the typical case for a fine partition of a decomposable distribution, i.e. the case where most intervals exhibit a small bias, is correctly detected.
Lemma 6.2.SSuppose that I is (η, γ)-fine, where cη + γ ≤ ǫ. Define GI = {i : I : bias(µ ↾I ) ≤
ǫ/100}. If µ( I∈GI ) ≥ 1 − ǫ, then Algorithm 3 accepts with probability at least 1 − δ.
Proof. Note by Observation 6.1 that the total weight of GI \ NI is at least 1 − 3ǫ. By the Chernoff
bound of Lemma 2.6, with probability at least 1 − δ/2 all but at most 4ǫs of the intervals drawn
in Step 2 fall into this set.
Finally, note that if I as drawn in Step 2 belongs to this set, then with probability at least
1 − δ/2s the invocation of T in Step 3 will accept it, so by a union bound with probability at least
1 − δ/2 all sampled intervals from this set will be accepted. All events occur together and make
the algorithm accept with probability at least 1 − δ, concluding the proof.
The following “soundness” lemma states that if too much weight is concentrated on intervals
where µ is far from uniform in the ℓ1 distance, then the algorithm rejects. Later we will show that
this is the only situation where µ cannot be easily learned through its flattening according to I.
Lemma
S 6.3. Suppose that I is (η, γ)-fine, where cη + γ ≤ ǫ. Define FI = {i : I : d(µ ↾I , UI ) > ǫ}.
If µ( I∈FI ) ≥ 7ǫ, then Algorithm 3 rejects with probability at least 1 − δ.
Proof. Note by Observation 6.1 that the total weight of FI \ NI is at least 5ǫ. By the Chernoff
bound of Lemma 2.6, with probability at least 1 − δ/2 at least 4ǫs of the intervals drawn in Step 2
fall into this set.
Finally, note that if I as drawn in Step 2 belongs to this set, then with with probability at least
1 − δ/2s the invocation of T in Step 3 will reject it, so by a union bound with probability at least
1 − δ/2 all sampled intervals from this set will be rejected. All events occur together and make the
algorithm reject with probability at least 1 − δ, concluding the proof.
13
Finally, we present the query complexity of the algorithm. It is presented as generally quadratic
in log(1/δ), but this can be made linear easily by first using the algorithm with δ = 1/3, and then
repeating it O(1/δ) times and taking the majority vote. When we use this lemma later on, both r
and c will be linear in the decomposability parameter L for a fixed ǫ, and δ will be a fixed constant.
Lemma 6.4. Algorithm 3 requires O(q log(1/δ)/ǫ) many samples, where q = q(n/c, ǫ/r, ǫ, δ/2s) is
the number of samples that the invocation of T in Step 3 requires.
In particular,
Algorithm 3 can be implemented either as an unconditional sampling algorithm
p
taking r n/c log2 (1/δ)/poly(ǫ) many samples, an adaptive conditional sampling algorithm taking r log2 (1/δ)/poly(ǫ) many samples, or a non-adaptive conditional sampling algorithm taking
r log2 (1/δ)poly(log n, 1/ǫ) many samples.
Proof. A single (unconditional) sample is taken each time Step 2 is reached, and all other samples
are taken by the invocation of T in Step 3. This makes the total number of samples to be s(q + 1) =
O(q log(1/δ)/ǫ).
The bound for each individual sampling model follows by plugging in Lemma 5.3, Lemma 5.4
and Lemma 5.5 respectively. For the last one it is important that the tester makes its queries
completely independently of I, as otherwise the algorithm would not have been non-adaptive.
7
Learning and testing decomposable distributions and properties
Here we finally put things together to produce a learning algorithm for L-decomposable distribution. This algorithm is not only guaranteed to learn with high probability a distribution that is
decomposable, but is also guaranteed with high probability to not produce a wrong output for any
distribution (though it may plainly reject a distribution that is not decomposable).
This is presented in Algorithm 4. We present it with a fixed error probability 2/3 because this
is what we use later on, but it is not hard to move to a general δ.
Algorithm 4: Learning an L-decomposable distribution
Input: Distribution µ supported over [n], parameters L (decomposability), ǫ > 0 (accuracy),
a weakly tolerant interval uniformity tester T taking input values (µ, I, m, γ, ǫ, δ)
1 Use Algorithm 2 with input values (µ, ǫ/2000L, ǫ/2000, 1/9) to obtain a partition I with
|I| ≤ r = 105 L log(1/ǫ)/ǫ
2 Use Algorithm 3 with input values (µ, L, r, I, ǫ/20, 1/9, T)
3 if Algorithm 3 rejected then reject
4 Use Lemma 4.9 with values (µ, I, ǫ/10, 1/9) to obtain µ′I
5 return µ′I
First we show completeness, that the algorithm will be successful for decomposable distributions.
Lemma 7.1. If µ is (ǫ/2000, L)-decomposable, then with probability at least 2/3 Algorithm 4 produces a distribution µ′ so that d(µ, µ′ ) ≤ ǫ.
Proof. By Lemma 3.4, withPprobability at least 8/9 the partition I is (ǫ/2000L, ǫ/2000)-fine, which
means by Lemma 4.4 that j∈[r]:bias(µ↾ ′ )>ǫ/2000 µ(Ij′ ) ≤ 3ǫ/2000. When this occurs, by Lemma 6.2
I
j
with probability at least 8/9 Algorithm 3 will accept and so the algorithm will move past Step 3.
14
In this situation, in particular by Lemma 4.6 we have that d(µI , µ) ≤ 15ǫ/20 (in fact this can be
bounded much smaller here), and with probability at least 8/9 (by Lemma 4.9) Step 4 provides a
distribution that is ǫ/10-close to µI and hence ǫ-close to µ.
Next we show soundness, that the algorithm will with high probability not mislead about the
distribution, whether it is decomposable or not.
Lemma 7.2. For any µ, the probability that Algorithm 4 produces (without rejecting) a distribution
µ′ for which d(µ, µ′ ) > ǫ is bounded by δ.
Proof. Consider the interval partition I. By Lemma 3.4, with
P probability at least 8/9 it is
(ǫ/2000L, ǫ/2000)-fine. When this happens, if I is such that
j:d(µ↾I ,UI ) µ(Ij ) > 7ǫ/20, then
j
j
by Lemma 6.3 with probability at least 8/9 the algorithm will reject in Step 3, and we are done
(recall that here a rejection is an allowable
P outcome).
On the other hand, if I is such that j:d(µ↾I ,UI ) µ(Ij ) ≤ 7ǫ/20, then by Lemma 4.6 we have that
j
j
d(µI , µ) ≤ 15ǫ/20, and with probability at least 8/9 (by Lemma 4.9) Step 4 provides a distribution
that is ǫ/10-close to µI and hence ǫ-close to µ, which is also an allowable outcome.
And finally, we plug in the sample complexity bounds.
Lemma 7.3. Algorithm 4 requires O(L log(1/ǫ)/ǫ + q/ǫ + L log(1/ǫ)/ǫ3 ) many samples, where the
value q = q(n/L, ǫ2 /105 L log(1/ǫ), ǫ/20, 2000/ǫ) is a bound on the number of samples that each
invocation of T inside Algorithm 3 requires.
In particular,
Algorithm 4 can be implemented either as an unconditional sampling algorithm
√
taking nL/poly(ǫ) many samples, an adaptive conditional sampling algorithm taking L/poly(ǫ)
many samples, or a non-adaptive conditional sampling algorithm taking Lpoly(log n, 1/ǫ) many
samples.
Proof. The three summands in the general expression follow respectively from the sample complexity calculations of Lemma 3.4 for Step 1, Lemma 6.4 for Step 2, and Lemma 4.9 for Step 4
respectively. Also note that all samples outside Step 2 are unconditional.
The bound for each individual sampling model follows from the respective bound stated in
Lemma 6.4.
Let us now summarize the above as a theorem.
Theorem 7.4. Algorithm 4 is capable of learning an (ǫ/2000, L)-decomposable distribution, giving
with probability at least 2/3 a distribution that is epsilon-close to it, such that for no distribution
will it give as output a distribution ǫ-far from it with probability more than 1/3.√
It can be implemented either as an unconditional sampling algorithm taking nL/poly(ǫ) many
samples, an adaptive conditional sampling algorithm taking L/poly(ǫ) many samples, or a nonadaptive conditional sampling algorithm taking Lpoly(log n, 1/ǫ) many samples.
Proof. This follows from Lemmas 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3 respectively.
Let us now move to the immediate application of the above for testing decomposable properties.
The algorithm achieving this is summarized as Algorithm 5
15
Algorithm 5: Testing L-decomposable properties.
Input: Distribution µ supported over [n], function L : (0, 1] × N → N (decomposability),
parameter ǫ > 0 (accuracy), an L-decomposable property C of distributions, a
weakly tolerant interval uniformity tester T taking input values (µ, I, m, γ, ǫ, δ).
1 Use Algorithm 4 with input values (µ, L(ǫ/4000, n), ǫ/2, T) to obtain µ′
2 if * then Algorithm 4 accepted and µ′ is ǫ/2-close to C accept else *reject
Theorem 7.5. Algorithm 5 is a test (with error probability 1/3) for the L-decomposable property C.
For
√ L = L(ǫ/4000, n), It can be implemented either as an unconditional sampling algorithm taking
nL/poly(ǫ) many samples, an adaptive conditional sampling algorithm taking L/poly(ǫ) many
samples, or a non-adaptive conditional sampling algorithm taking Lpoly(log n, 1/ǫ) many samples.
Proof. The number and the nature of the samples are determined fully by the application of Algorithm 4 in Step 1, and are thus the same as in Theorem 7.4. Also by this theorem, for a distribution
µ ∈ C, with probability at least 2/3 an ǫ/2-close distribution µ′ will be produced, and so it will be
accepted in Step 2.
Finally, if µ is ǫ-far from C, then with probability at least 2/3 Step 1 will either produce a
rejection, or again produce µ′ that is ǫ/2-close to µ. In the latter case, µ′ will be ǫ/2-far from C by
the triangle inequality, and so Step 2 will reject in either case.
8
A weakly tolerant tester for the non-adaptive conditional model
Given a distribution µ, supported over [n], and an interval I ⊆ [n] such that µ(I) ≥ γ, we give a
tester that uses non-adaptive conditional queries to µ to distinguish between the cases bias(µ ↾I ) ≤
ǫ/100 and d(µ ↾I , UI ) > ǫ, using ideas from [CFGM13]. A formal description of the test is given
as Algorithm 6. It is formulated here with error probability δ = 1/3. Lemma 5.5 is obtained from
this the usual way, by repeating the algorithm O(1/δ) times and taking the majority vote.
We first make the observation that makes Algorithm 6 suitable for a non-adaptive setting.
Observation 8.1. Algorithm 6 can be implemented using only non-adaptive conditional queries to
the distribution µ, that are chosen independently of I.
Proof. First, note that the algorithm samples elements from µ at three places. Initially, it samples
unconditionally from µ in Step 1, and then it performs conditional samples from the sets Uk in
Steps 10 and 13. In Steps 10 and 13, the samples are conditioned on sets Uk , where k depends on
I. However, observe that we can sample from all sets Uk , for all 0 ≤ k ≤ log n, at the beginning,
and then use just the samples from the appropriate Uk at Steps 10 and 13. This only increases the
bound on the number of samples by a factor of log n. Thus we have only non-adaptive queries, all
of which are made at the start of the algorithm, independently of I.
The following lemma is used in Step 6 of our algorithm.
Lemma 8.2. Let µ be a distribution supported over [n] and I ⊆ [n] be an interval such that
µ(I) ≥ γ. Using t = 4(|I|+log(2/δ))
unconditional queries to µ, we can construct a distribution µ′
ǫ2 γ
over I such that, with probability at least 1 − δ, d(µ ↾I , µ′ ) ≤ ǫ (in other cases µ′ may be arbitrary).
16
Algorithm 6: Non-adaptive weakly tolerant uniformity tester
Input: Distribution µ supported over [n], interval I ⊆ [n], weight bound γ, accuracy ǫ > 0.
4(log10 n+3)
1 Sample t =
elements from µ.
ǫ2 γ
2 for k ∈ {0, . . . , log n} do
3
Set pk = 2−k .
4
Choose a set Uk ⊆ [n], where each i ∈ [n] is in Uk with probability pk , independently of
other elements in [n].
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
if |I| ≤ log10 n then
Use Lemma 8.2, using the t unconditional samples from µ, to construct a distribution µ′
if * then d(µ′ , UI ) ≤ ǫ/2 accept, else * reject.
else
for Uk such that k ≤ log
14
15
16
17
18
|I|
2 log8 n
, and |I ∩ Uk | ≥ log8 n do
Sample log3 n elements from µ ↾Uk .
if the same element from I ∩ Uk has been sampled twice then reject.
2
3
n log(3 log n)
ǫ2 γ
Choose an index k such that
16
13
log8 n ≤ |I|pk <
4
3
log8 n.
elements from µ ↾Uk , for a large constant C.
Sample mk = C log
if |I ∩ Uk | > 2|I|pk or the number of samples in I ∩ Uk is less than γmk /40 then
reject.
else
Use Lemma 2.9 with the samples received from I ∩ Uk , to construct µ′ , supported on
ǫ
with probability at least 9/10.
I ∩ Uk , such that kµ′ − µ ↾I∩Uk k∞ ≤ 80|I∩U
k|
3ǫ
′
if * then kµ − UI∩Uk k∞ ≤ 80|I∩Uk | accept, else * reject.
17
unconditional samples. Let tI be the number of samples that belong
Proof. Take t = 4(|I|+log(2/δ))
ǫ2 γ
to I. Then, E[tI ] = tµ(I) ≥ tγ. Therefore, by Hoeffding bounds, with probability at least
1 − exp(−tµ(I)/4), tI ≥ tµ(I)/2 ≥ tγ/2.
The tI samples are distributed according to µ ↾I . By the choice of t, with probability at least
1 − δ/2, tI ≥ 2(|I| + log(2/δ))/ǫ2 . Therefore, by Lemma 2.8, we can obtain a distribution µ′ ,
supported over I, such that with probability at least 1 − δ, d(µ ↾I , µ′ ) ≤ ǫ.
If we did not obtain sufficiently many samples (either because µ(I) < γ or due to a low probability event) then we just output an arbitrary distribution supported on I.
Lemma 8.3 (Completeness). If µ(I) ≥ γ and bias(µ ↾I ) ≤ ǫ/100, then Algorithm 6 accepts with
probability at least 2/3.
Proof. First note that if |I| ≤ log10 n, then we use Lemma 8.2 to test the distance of µ ↾I to uniform
with probability at least 9/10 in Step 7. For the remaining part of the proof, we will assume that
|I| > log10 n.
For a set Uk chosen by the algorithm, and any i ∈ I ∩ Uk , the probability that it is sampled
2
3
µ(i)
twice in Step 11 is at most log2 n µ(U
. Since µ(Uk ) ≥ µ(I ∩ Uk ), the probability of sampling
k)
2
3
µ(i)
. By Observation 2.2 bias(µ ↾I ) ≤ ǫ/100 implies
twice in Step 11 is at most log2 n µ(I∩U
k)
ǫ
kµ ↾I −UI k∞ ≤ 100|I| , so we have
ǫ
µ(I)
ǫ
µ(I)
1−
≤ µ(i) ≤
1+
.
|I|
100
|I|
100
From Equation 3 we get the following for all Uk .
ǫ
|I ∩ Uk |µ(I)
ǫ
|I ∩ Uk |µ(I)
1−
≤ µ(I ∩ Uk ) ≤
1+
.
|I|
100
|I|
100
(3)
(4)
Therefore, the probability that the algorithm samples the same element in I ∩ Uk at Step 11 twice
is bounded as follows.
3
X log3 n µ(i) 2
log n maxi∈I∩Uk µ(i)2
≤ |I ∩ Uk |
2
2
µ(I ∩ Uk )
µ(I ∩ Uk )2
i∈I∩Uk
3
log n
1 + ǫ/100 2
1
≤
|I ∩ Uk |
1 − ǫ/100
2
Since |I ∩ Uk | ≥ log8 n for the k chosen in Step 9, we can bound the sum as follows.
X log3 n µ(i) 2
1
1 + ǫ/100 2
≤
.
µ(I ∩ Uk )
2
log2 n 1 − ǫ/100
i∈I∩Uk
Therefore, with probability at least 1 − o(1), the algorithm does not reject at Step 11.
To show that the algorithm accepts with probability at least 2/3 in Step 18, we proceed as
follows. Combining Equations 3 and 4, we get the following.
1
1 − ǫ/100
1 + ǫ/100
1
≤ µ ↾I∩Uk (i) ≤
|I ∩ Uk | 1 + ǫ/100
|I ∩ Uk | 1 − ǫ/100
18
ǫ
.
From this it follows that kµ ↾I∩Uk −UI∩Uk k∞ ≤ 40|I∩U
k|
We now argue that in this case, the test does not reject at Step 14, for the k chosen in Step
12. Observe that E[µ(I ∩ Uk )] ≥ pk γ. Also, the expected size of the set I ∩ Uk is pk |I|. Since the
k chosen in Step 12 is such that |I|pk ≥ 32 log8 n, with probability at least 1 − exp(−O(log8 n)),
pk |I|/2 ≤ |I ∩ Uk | ≤ 2pk |I| (and in particular Step 14 does not reject). Therefore from Equation 4,
we get that, with probability at least 1 − exp(−O(log8 n)), µ(I ∩ Uk ) ≥ pk γ/3. Since E[µ(Uk )] = pk ,
we can conclude using Markov’s inequality that, with probability at least 9/10, µ(Uk ) ≤ 10pk . The
expected number of samples from I∩Uk among the mk samples used in Step 17 is mk µ(I∩Uk )/µ(Uk ).
Therefore, with probability at least 9/10, the expected number of samples from I ∩ Uk among the
mk samples is at least mk γ/30. Therefore, with probability, at least 9/10 − o(1), at least mk γ/40
elements of I ∩ Uk are sampled, and the tester does not reject at Step 14. The indexes that are
sampled in Step 13 that lie in I ∩ Uk are distributed according to µ ↾I∩Uk and we know that
|I ∩ Uk | ≤ 2|I|pk ≤ 83 log8 n. Therefore, with probability at least 9/10, we get a distribution µ′ such
ǫ
in Step 17.
that kµ′ − µ ↾I∩Uk k∞ ≤ 80|I∩U
k|
Therefore, the test correctly accepts in Step 18 for the k chosen in Step 12.
Now we prove the soundness of the tester mentioned above. First we state a lemma from
Chakraborty et al [CFGM13].
Lemma 8.4 ([CFGM13], adapted for intervals). Let µ be a distribution, and I ⊆ [n] be an interval
such that d(µ ↾I , UI ) ≥ ǫ. Then the following two conditions hold.
o
n
such that |B1 | ≥ ǫ|I|/2.
1. There exists a set B1 = i ∈ I | µ ↾I (i) < 1+ǫ/3
|I|
o
n
log |I|
, and a set Bj of cardinality at least
2. There exists an index j ∈ 3, . . . , log(1+ǫ/3)
such that
(1+ǫ/3)j−1
|I|
≤ µ ↾I (i) <
(1+ǫ/3)j
|I|
ǫ2 |I|
,
96(1+ǫ/3)j log |I|
for all i ∈ Bj .
Now we analyze the case where d(µ ↾I , UI ) > ǫ.
Lemma 8.5 (Soundness). Let µ be a distribution supported on [n], and let I ⊆ [n] be an interval
such that µ(I) ≥ γ. If d(µ ↾I , UI ) ≥ ǫ, then Algorithm 6 rejects with probability at least 2/3.
Proof. Observe that when |I| ≤ log10 n, the algorithm rejects with probability at least 9/10 in
Step 7. For the remainder of the proof, we will assume that |I| > log10 n. We analyze two cases
according to the value of j given by Lemma 8.4.
1. Suppose that j > 2 is such that |Bj | ≥
ǫ2 |I|
,
96(1+ǫ/3)j log |I|
and (1 + ǫ/3)j ≤ log6 n. The expected
number of elements from this set that is chosen in Uk is at least
of k made in Step 12, we have |I|pk ≥
2
3
ǫ2 |I|pk
.
96(1+ǫ/3)j log |I|
For the choice
8
log n. The probability that no index from Bj is chosen
8
n ǫ |I|/(1+ǫ) log |I|
. Since (1 + ǫ/3)j ≤ log6 n,
which is at most (1 − 2 log
3|I| )
2
log n
this is at most exp − ǫ 144
. Therefore, with probability 1 − o(1), at least one element i is
chosen from Bj .
in Uk is (1 − pk
)|Bj |
2
j
Since |B1 | ≥ ǫ|I|/2, the probability that no element from B1 is chosen in Uk is at most
(1 − pk )ǫ|I|/2 . Substituting for pk , we can conclude that, with probability 1 − o(1), at least
one element i′ is chosen from the set B1 .
19
Now, µ ↾I (i) ≥ (1 + ǫ/3)µ ↾I (i′ ). Hence, µ ↾I∩Uk (i) ≥ (1 + ǫ/3)µ ↾I∩Uk (i′ ). This implies
ǫ
that kµ ↾I∩Uk −UI∩Uk k∞ ≥ 20|I∩U
. The algorithm will reject with high probability in Step
k|
18, unless it has already rejected in Step 14.
2
ǫ |I|
, and (1 +
2. Now, we consider the case where j > 2 is such that |Bj | ≥ 96(1+ǫ/3)
j
log |I|
n
o
|I|
ǫ/3)j > log6 n. Let k = max 0, ⌊log 4(1+ǫ/3)
j log 2 n ⌋ . Then, for this value of k, pk ≥
n
o
n
o
2
j
log n
4(1+ǫ/3)j log2 n
min 1, 2(1+ǫ/3)
.
Also,
for
this
value
of
k,
p
≤
min
1,
. With probak
|I|
|I|
bility at least 1 − exp(−O(log5 n)), |Uk ∩ I| ≥ log8 n, for this value of k.
Furthermore, the probability that Bj ∩ Uk is empty is (1 − pk )|Bj | . Substituting the values of
|Bj | and pk , we get that Pr[Bj ∩ Uk = ∅] ≤ exp(−ǫ2 log n/48). Therefore, with probability at
least 1 − exp(−ǫ2 log n/48), Uk contains an element of Bj .
Let i ∈ Bj ∩ Uk . Since i ∈ Bj , from Lemma 8.4 we know that µ ↾I (i) =
j−1
µ(i)
µ(I)
≥
(1+ǫ)j−1
.
|I|
µ(I)
From this bound, we get that µ ↾Uk (i) ≥ (1+ǫ)
|I|µ(Uk ) . The expected value of µ(Uk ) is pk .
By Markov’s inequality, with probability at least 9/10, µ(Uk ) ≤ 10pk . Therefore, µ ↾Uk (i) ≥
(1+ǫ)j−1 γ
γ
10|I|pk ≥ 40(1+ǫ/3) log2 n . The probability that i is sampled at most once in this case is at
log3 (n)−1
γ
most log3 (n) 1 − 40(1+ǫ/3)
. Therefore, with probability at least 1 − o(1), i is
2
log n
sampled at least twice and the tester rejects at Step 11.
Proof of Lemma 5.5. Given the input values (µ, I, m, γ, ǫ, δ), we iterate Algorithm 6 O(1/δ) independent times with input values (µ, I, γ, ǫ) (we may ignore m here), and take the majority vote.
The sample complexity is evident from the description of the algorithm. If indeed µ(I) ≥ γ then
Lemma 8.3 and Lemma 8.5 provide that every round gives the correct answer with probability at
least 2/3, making the majority vote correct with probability at least 1 − δ.
9
Introducing properties characterized by atlases
In this section, we give a testing algorithm for properties characterized by atlases, which we formally
define next. We will show in the next subsection that distributions that are L-decomposable are,
in particular, characterized by atlases. First we start with the definition of an inventory.
Definition 9.1 (inventory). Given an interval I = [a, b] ⊆ [n] and a real-valued function ν : [a, b] →
[0, 1], the inventory of ν over [a, b] is the multiset M corresponding to (ν(a), . . . , ν(b)).
That is, we keep count of the function values over the interval including repetitions, but ignore
their order. In particular, for a distribution µ = (p1 , . . . , pn ) over [n], the inventory of µ over [a, b]
is the multiset M corresponding to (pa , . . . , pb ).
Definition 9.2 (atlas). Given a distribution µ over [n], and an interval partition I = (I1 , . . . , Ik )
of [n], the atlas A of µ over I is the ordered pair (I, M), where M is the sequence of multisets
(M1 , . . . , Mk ) so that Mj is the inventory of µ over Ij for every j ∈ [k]. In this setting, we also say
that µ conforms to A.
20
We note that there can be many distributions over [n] whose atlas is the same. We will also
denote by an atlas A any ordered pair (I, M) where I is an interval partition of [n] and M is a
sequence of multisets of the same length, so that the total sum of all members of all multisets is 1.
It is a simple observation that for every such A there exists at least one distribution that conforms
to it. The length of an atlas |A| is defined as the shared length of its interval partition and sequence
of multisets.
We now define what it means for a property to be characterized by atlases, and state our main
theorem concerning such properties.
Definition 9.3. For a function k : R+ × N → N, we say that a property of distributions C is
k-characterized by atlases if for every n ∈ N and every ǫ > 0 we have a set A of atlases of lengths
bounded by k(ǫ, n), so that every distribution µ over [n] satisfying C conforms to some A ∈ A, while
on the other hand no distribution µ that conforms to any A ∈ A is ǫ-far from satisfying C.
Theorem 9.4. If C is a property of distributions that is k-characterized by atlases, then for any
ǫ > 0 there is an adaptive conditional testing algorithm for C with query complexity k(ǫ/5, n) ·
poly(log n, 1/ǫ) (and error probability bound 1/3).
9.1
Applications and examples
We first show that L-decomposable properties are in particular characterized by atlases.
Lemma 9.5. If C is a property of distributions that is L-decomposable, then C is k-characterized
by atlases, where k(ǫ, n) = L(ǫ/3, n).
Proof. Every distribution µ ∈ C that is supported over [n] defines an atlas in conjunction with the
interval partition of the L-decomposition of µ for L = L(γ, n). Let A be the set of all such atlases.
We will show that C is L(3γ, n)-characterized by A.
Let µ ∈ C. Since µ is L-decomposable, µ conforms to the atlas given by the L-decomposition
and it is in A as defined above.
Now suppose that µ conforms to an atlas A ∈ A, where I = (I1 , . . . , Iℓ ) is the sequence of
intervals. By the construction of A, there exists a distribution χ ∈ C that conforms with A. Now,
for each j ∈ [ℓ] such that µ(Ij ) ≤ γ/L, we have (noting that χ(Ij ) = µ(Ij ))
X
i∈Ij
|µ(i) − χ(i)| ≤
X
µ(i) +
X
i∈Ij
i∈Ij
χ(i) ≤ 2µ(Ij ) ≤
2γ
.
ℓ
(5)
Noting that µ and χ have the same maximum and minimum over Ij (as they have the same
inventory), for each j ∈ [ℓ] and i ∈ Ij , we know that |µ(i) − χ(i)| ≤ maxi∈Ij µ(i) − mini∈Ij µ(i).
Therefore, for all j ∈ [ℓ] such that maxi∈Ij µ(i) ≤ (1 + γ) mini∈Ij µ(i), |µ(i) − χ(i)| ≤ γ mini∈Ij µ(i).
Therefore,
X
|µ(i) − χ(i)| ≤ |Ij |γ min µj (i) ≤ γµj (Ij ).
(6)
i∈Ij
i∈Ij
Finally, recall that since A came from an L-decomposition of χ, all intervals are covered by the
above cases. Summing up Equations 5 and 6 for all j ∈ {1, 2, . . . , ℓ}, we obtain d(µ, χ) ≤ 3γ.
21
Note that atlases characterize also properties that do not have shape restriction. The following
is a simple observation.
Observation 9.6. If C is a property of distributions that is symmetric over [n], then C is 1characterized by atlases.
It was shown in Chakraborty et al [CFGM13] that such properties are efficiently testable with
conditional queries, so Theorem 9.4 in particular generalizes this result. Also, the notion of characterization by atlases provides a natural model for tolerant testing, as we will see in the next
subsection.
10
Atlas characterizations and tolerant Testing
We now show that for all properties of distributions that are characterized by atlases, there are
efficient tolerant testers as well. In [CDGR15], it was shown that for a large property of distribution
properties that have “semi-agnostic” learners, there are efficient tolerant testers. In this subsection,
we show that when the algorithm is given conditional query access, there are efficient tolerant testers
for the larger class of properties that are characterized by atlases, including decomposable properties
that otherwise do not lend themselves to tolerant testing.
The mechanism presented here will also be used in the proof of Theorem 9.4 itself. First, we
give a definition of tolerant testing. We note that the definition extends naturally to algorithms
that make conditional queries to a distribution.
Definition 10.1. Let C be any property of probability distributions. An (η, ǫ)-tolerant tester for C
with query complexity q and error probability δ, is an algorithm that samples q elements x1 , . . . , xq
from a distribution µ, accepts with probability at least 1−δ if d(µ, C) ≤ η, and rejects with probability
at least 1 − δ if d(µ, C) ≥ η + ǫ.
In [CDGR15], they show that for every α > 0, there is an ǫ > 0 that depends on α, such that
there is an (ǫ, α − ǫ)-tolerant tester for certain shape-restricted properties. On the other hand,
tolerant testing using unconditional queries for other properties, such as the (1-decomposable)
property of being uniform, require Ω (n/ log n) many samples ([VV10]). We prove that, in the
presence of conditional query access, there is an (η, ǫ)-tolerant tester for every η, ǫ > 0 such that
η + ǫ < 1 for all properties of probability distributions that are characterized by atlases.
We first present a definition and prove an easy lemma that will be useful later on.
Definition 10.2. Given a partition I = (I1 , . . . , Ik ) of [n], we say that a permutation σ : [n] → [n]
is I-preserving if for every 1 ≤ j ≤ k we have σ(Ij ) = Ij .
Lemma 10.3. Let χ and χ′ be two distributions, supported on [n], both of which conform to an
atlas A = (I, M). If A′ = (I, M′ ) is another atlas with the same interval partition as A, such that
χ is ǫ-close to conforming to A′ , then χ′ is also ǫ-close to conforming to A′ .
Proof. It is an easy observation that there exists an I-preserving permutation σ that moves χ to
χ′ . Now let µ be the distribution that conforms to A′ such that d(µ, χ) ≤ ǫ, and let µ′ be the
distribution that results from having σ operate on µ. It is not hard to see that µ′ conforms to A′
(which has the same interval partition as A), and that it is ǫ-close to χ′ .
22
For a property C of distributions that is k-characterized by atlases, let Cη be the property of
distributions of being η-close to C. The following lemma states that Cη is also k-characterized by
atlases. This lemma will also be important for us outside the context of tolerant testing per-se.
Lemma 10.4. Let C be a property of probability distributions that is k(ǫ, n)-characterized by atlases.
For any η > 0, let Cη be the set of all probability distributions µ such that d(µ, C) ≤ η. Then, there
is a set Aη of atlases, of length at most k, such that every µ ∈ Cη conforms to at least one atlas in
Aη , and every distribution that conforms to an atlas in Aη is η + ǫ-close to C, and is ǫ-close to Cη .
Proof. Since C is k-characterized by atlases, there is a set of atlases A of length at most k(ǫ, n)
such that for each µ ∈ C, there is an atlas A ∈ A to which it conforms, and any χ that conforms
to an atlas A ∈ A is ǫ-close to C. Now, let Aη be obtained by taking each atlas A ∈ A, and
adding all atlases, with the same interval partition, corresponding to distributions that are η-close
to conforming to A.
First, note that the new atlases that are added have the same interval partitions as atlases in
A, and hence have the same length bound k(ǫ, n). To complete the proof of the lemma, we need to
prove that every µ ∈ Cη conforms to some atlas in Aη , and that no distribution that conforms to
Aη is η + ǫ-far from C.
Take any µ ∈ Cη . There exists some distribution µ′ ∈ C such that d(µ, µ′ ) ≤ η. Since C is
k-characterized by atlases, there is some atlas A ∈ A such that µ′ conforms with A. Also, observe
that µ is η-close to conforming to A through µ′ . Therefore, there is an atlas A′ with the same
interval partition as A that was added in Aη , which is the atlas corresponding to the distribution
µ. Hence, there is an atlas in Aη to which µ conforms.
Conversely, let χ be a distribution that conforms with an atlas A′ ∈ Aη . From the construction
of Aη , we know that there is an atlas A ∈ A with the same interval partition as A′ , and there is
a distribution χ′ that conforms to A′ and is η-close to conforming to A. Therefore, by Lemma
10.3 χ is also η-close to conforming to A. Let µ′ be the distribution conforming to A such that
d(χ, µ′ ) ≤ η. Since µ′ conforms to an atlas A ∈ A, d(µ′ , C) ≤ ǫ. Therefore, by the triangle
inequality, d(χ, C) ≤ η + ǫ.
This also implies that d(χ, Cη ) ≤ ǫ by considering χ̃ = (ηχ+ǫµ̃)/(ǫ+η) where µ̃ is the distribution
in C that is ǫ + η-close to χ. Note that χ̃ is η-close to µ̃ and ǫ-close to χ.
Using Lemma 10.4 we get the following corollary of Theorem 9.4 about tolerant testing of
distributions characterized by atlases.
Corollary 10.5. Let C be a property of distributions that is k-characterized by atlases. For every
η, ǫ > 0 such that η+ǫ < 1, there is an (η, ǫ)-tolerant tester for C that takes k(ǫ/5, n)·poly(log n, 1/ǫ)
conditional samples and succeeds with probability at least 2/3.
11
Some useful lemmas about atlases and characterizations
We start with a definition and a lemma, providing an alternative equivalent definition of properties
k-characterizable by atlases
Definition 11.1 (permutation-resistant distributions). For a function k : R+ × N → N, a property
C of probability distributions is k-piecewise permutation resistant if for every n ∈ N, every ǫ > 0,
and every distribution µ over [n] in C, there exists a partition I of [n] into up to k(ǫ, n) intervals,
23
so that every I-preserving permutation of [n] transforms µ into a distribution that is ǫ-close to a
distribution in C.
Lemma 11.2. For k : R+ × N → N, a property C of probability distributions over [n] is k-piecewise
permutation resistant if and only if it is k-characterized by atlases.
Proof. If C is k-piecewise permutation resistant, then for each distribution µ ∈ C, there exists
an interval partition I of [n] such that every I-preserving permutation of [n] transforms µ into a
distribution that is ǫ-close to C. Each distribution µ thus gives an atlas over I, and the collection of
these atlases for all µ ∈ C characterizes the property C. Therefore, C is k-characterized by atlases.
Conversely, let C be a property of distributions that are k-characterized by atlases and let A be
the set of atlases. For each µ ∈ C, let Aµ be the atlas in A that characterizes µ and let Iµ be the
interval partition corresponding to this atlas. Now, every Iµ -preserving permutation σ of µ gives a
distribution µσ that has the same atlas Aµ . Since C is k-characterized by atlases, µσ is ǫ-close to
C. Therefore, C is k-piecewise permutation resistant as well.
We now prove the following lemma about ǫ/k-fine partitions of distributions characterized by
atlases, having a similar flavor as Lemma 4.3 for L-decomposable properties. Since we cannot avert
a poly(log n) dependency anyway, for simplicity we use the 1-parameter variant of fine partitions.
Lemma 11.3. Let C be a property of distributions that is k(ǫ, n)-characterized by atlases through
A. For any µ ∈ C, any ǫ/k-fine interval partition I ′ of µ, and the corresponding atlas A′ = (I ′ , M′ )
for µ (not necessarily in A), any distribution µ′ that conforms to A′ is 3ǫ-close to C.
Proof. Let A = (I, M) be the atlas from A to which µ conforms, and let I ′ = (I1′ , I2′ , . . . , Ir′ ) be
an ǫ/k-fine interval partition of µ. Let P ⊆ I ′ be the set of intervals that
more than one
S intersect
′
′
interval in I. Since I is ǫ/k-fine, and the length of A is at most k, µ( I ′ ∈P Ij ) ≤ ǫ (note that P
S j
cannot contain singletons). Also, since µ′ conforms to A′ , we have µ′ ( I ′ ∈P Ij′ ) ≤ ǫ.
j
Let µ̃ be a distribution supported over [n] obtained as follows: For each interval Ij′ ∈ P,
µ̃(i) = µ(i) for every i ∈ Ij′ . For each interval Ij′ ∈ I ′ \ P, µ̃(i) = µ′ (i) for every i ∈ Ij′ . Note that
that the inventories of µ̃ and µ are identical over any Ij′ in I ′ \ P. From this it follows that µ̃ also
conforms to A, and in particular µ̃ is a distribution. To see this, for any Ij in I partition it to its
intersection with the members of I ′ \ P contained in it, and all the rest. For the former we use that
µ and µ′ have the same inventories, and for the latter we specified that µ̃ has the same values as µ.
Since µ′ and µ̃ are identical at all points except those in P, we have d(µ′ , µ̃) ≤ 2ǫ. Furthermore,
d(µ̃, C) ≤ ǫ since µ̃ conforms to A ∈ A. Therefore, by the triangle inequality, d(µ′ , C) ≤ 3ǫ.
The main idea of our test for a property of distributions k-characterized by atlases, starts with
a γ/k-fine partition I obtained by through Algorithm 1. We then show how to compute an atlas
A with this interval partition such that there is a distribution µI that conforms to A that is close
to µ. We use the ǫ-trimming sampler from [CFGM13] to obtain such an atlas corresponding to I.
To test if µ is in C, we show that it is sufficient to check if there is some distribution conforming to
A that is close to a distribution in C.
12
An adaptive test for properties characterized by atlases
Our main technical lemma, which we state here and prove in Section 13, is the following possibility
of “learning” an atlas of an unknown distribution for an interval partition I, under the conditional
24
sampling model.
Lemma 12.1. Given a distribution µ supported over [n], and a partition I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Ir ), using
r · poly(log n, 1/ǫ, log(1/δ)) conditional samples from µ we can construct, with probability at least
1 − δ, an atlas for some distribution µI that is ǫ-close to µ.
First, we show how this implies Theorem 9.4. To prove it, we give as Algorithm 7 a formal
description of the test.
Algorithm 7: Adaptive conditional tester for properties k-characterized by atlases
Input: A distribution µ supported over [n], a function k : (0, 1] × N → N, accuracy
parameter ǫ > 0, a property C of distributions that is k-characterized by the set of
atlases A
1 Use Algorithm 1 with input values (µ, ǫ/5k(ǫ/5, n), 1/6) to obtain a partition I with
|I| ≤ 20k(ǫ/5, n) log(n) log(1/ǫ)/ǫ
2 Use Lemma 12.1 with accuracy parameter ǫ/5 and error parameter 1/6 to obtain an atlas
AI ′ corresponding to I ′
3 if * then there exists χ ∈ C that is ǫ/5-close to conforming to AI ′ accept else reject
Lemma 12.2 (completeness). Let C be a property of distributions that is k-characterized by atlases,
and let µ be any distribution supported over [n]. If µ ∈ C, then with probability at least 2/3 Algorithm
7 accepts.
Proof. In Step 2, with probability at least 5/6 > 2/3, we get an atlas AI ′ such that there is a
distribution µI ′ that is ǫ/5-close to µ. Step 3 then accepts on account of χ = µ.
Lemma 12.3 (soundness). Let C be a property of distributions that is k-characterized by atlases,
and let µ be any distribution supported over [n]. If d(µ, C) > ǫ, then with probability at least 2/3
Algorithm 7 rejects.
Proof. With probability at least 2/3, for k = k(ǫ/5, n) we get an ǫ/5k-fine partition I ′ in Step 1, as
well as an atlas AI ′ in Step 2 such that there is a distribution µI ′ conforming to it that is ǫ/5-close
to µ.
Suppose that the algorithm accepted in Step 3 on account of χ ∈ C. Then there is a χ′ that is
ǫ/5-close to χ and conforms to AI ′ . By Lemma 10.4, the property of being ǫ/5-close to C is itself
k-characterized by atlases. Let Aǫ/5 be the collection of atlases characterizing it. Using Lemma
11.3 with χ′ and Aǫ/5 , we know that χ′ is 3ǫ/5-close to some χ, which is in Cǫ/5 and thus ǫ/5-close
to C. Since χ′ is also ǫ/5-close to µ, we obtain that µ is ǫ-close to C by the triangle inequality,
contradicting d(µ, C) > ǫ.
Proof of Theorem 9.4. Given a distribution µ, supported on [n], and a property C of distributions
that is k-characterized by atlases, we use Algorithm 7. The correctness follows from Lemmas 12.2
and 12.3. The number of samples made in Step 1 is clearly dominated by the number of samples
in Step 2, which is k(ǫ/5, n) · poly(log n, 1/ǫ).
25
13
Constructing an atlas for a distribution
Before we prove Lemma 12.1, we will define the notion of value-distances and prove lemmas that
will be useful for the proof of the theorem.
Definition 13.1 (value-distance). Given two multisets A,B of real numbers, both of the same size
(e.g. two inventories over an interval [a, b]), the value-distance between them is the minimum ℓ1
distance between a vector that conforms to A and a vector that conforms to B.
The following observation gives a simple method to calculate the value-distances between two
multisets A and B.
Observation 13.2. The value-distance between A and B is equal to the ℓ1 distance between the
two vectors conforming to the respective sorting of the two multisets.
Proof. Given two vectors v and w corresponding to A and B achieving the value-distance, first
assume that the smallest value of A is not larger than the smallest value of B. Assume without
loss of generality (by permuting both v and w) that v1 is of the smallest value among those of A.
It is not hard to see that, in this case, one can make w1 to be of the smallest value among those
of B without increasing the distance (by swapping the two values), and from here one can proceed
by induction over |A| = |B|.
We now prove two lemmas that will be useful for the proof of Lemma 12.1.
Lemma 13.3. Let A and B be two multisets of the same size, both with members whose values
range in {0, α1 , . . . , αr }. Let mj be the number of appearances of αj in A, and nj the corresponding
number
Pr in B. If mj ≤ nj for every 1 ≤ j ≤ r, then the value-distance between A and B is bounded
by j=1 (nj − mj )αj .
Proof. Let vA = {a1 , . . . , al } and vB = {b1 , . . . , bl } be two vectors such that a1 = · · · = am1 = α1 ,
am1 +1 = · · · = an1 = 0 and b1 = · · · = bn1 = α1 , and similarly for j ∈ {1, . . . , r − 1}, anj +1 =
· · · = anjP
+mj+1 = αj+1 , anj +mj+1 +1 = · · · = anj +nj+1 = 0 and bnj +1 = · · · = bnj +nj+1 = αj+1 .
For k > rj=1 nj , we set ak = bk = 0. The vectors vA and vB P
conform to the multisets A and
B respectively, and the ℓ1 distance between the two vectors is rj=1 (nj − mj )αj , so the lemma
follows.
Lemma 13.4. Let µ be a probability distribution over {1, . . . , n},Pand let µ̃ be a vector of size n
where each entry is a real number in the interval [0, 1], such that P i∈[n] |µ(i) − µ̃(i)| ≤ ǫ. Let µ̂ be
a
Pprobability distribution over {1, . . . , n} defined as µ̂(i) = µ̃(i)/ i∈[n] µ̃(i) for all i ∈ [n]. Then
i∈[n] |µ(i) − µ̂(i)| ≤ 5ǫ.
P
P
P
Proof.
We have | i∈[n] µ(i) − i∈[n] µ̃(i)| ≤ ǫ. Therefore, 1 − ǫ ≤
i∈[n] µ̃(i) ≤ 1 + ǫ. If
P
i∈[n] µ̃(i) < 1, then µ̂(i) ≤ µ̃(i)/(1
P− ǫ) and µ̂(i) > µ̃(i). Therefore, µ̂(i) ≤ (1 + 2ǫ)µ̃(i) and
hence 0 ≤ µ̂(i) − µ̃(i) ≤ 2ǫµ̃(i). If i∈[n] µ̃(i) ≥ 1, then µ̂(i) ≥ µ̃(i)/(1 + ǫ) ≥ (1 − ǫ)µ̃(i) and
µ̂(i) ≤ µ̃(i). Therefore 0 ≤ µ̃(i) − µ̂(i) ≤ ǫµ̃(i). Therefore |µ̃(i) − µ̂(i)| ≤ 2ǫµ̃(i), in all cases, for all
i.
P
P
P
P
Now, i∈[n] |µ(i) − µ̂(i)| ≤ i∈[n] |µ(i)
P
P − µ̃(i)| + i∈[n] |µ̃(i) − µ̂(i)|. Since i∈[n] |µ̃(i) − µ̂(i)| ≤
2ǫ i∈[n] µ̃(i) ≤ 2ǫ(1 + ǫ), we get that i∈[n] |µ(i) − µ̂(i)| ≤ 5ǫ.
Now we recall the definition of an ǫ-trimming sampler from [CFGM13].
26
Definition 13.5 (ǫ-trimming sampler). An ǫ-trimming sampler with s samples for a distribution
µ supported over [n], is an algorithm that has conditional query access to the distribution µ and
returns s pairs of values
(r, µ(r)) (for r = 0, µ(r) is not output) from a distribution µ supported on
P
{0}∪[n], such that i∈[n] |µ(i)−µ(i)| ≤ 4ǫ, and each r is independently drawn from µ. Furthermore,
there is a set P of poly(log n, 1/ǫ) real numbers such that for all i either µ(i) = 0 or µ(i) ∈ P .
The existence of an ǫ-trimming sampler with a small set of values was proved in [CFGM13].
Let us formally state this lemma.
Lemma 13.6 ([CFGM13]). Given conditional query access to a distribution µ supported on [n],
there is an ǫ-trimming sampler that makes 32s · ǫ−4 · log5 n · log(sδ−1 log n) many conditional queries
to µ, and returns, with probability at least 1 − δ, a sequence of s samples from a distribution µ,
i−1
where P = { (1+ǫ)n ǫ | 1 ≤ i ≤ k − 1} for k = log n log(ǫ−1 )/ log2 (1 + ǫ).
13.1
Proving the main lemma
The proof of Lemma 12.1 depends on the following technical lemma.
Lemma 13.7. Let µ be a distribution supported over [n], and let P = (P0 , P1 , P2 , . . . , Pr ) be a
partition of [n] into r + 1 subsets with the following properties.
1. For each Pk ∈ P, µ(i) = pk for every i ∈ Pk , where p1 , . . . , pr (but not p0 ) are known.
2. Given an i ∈ [n] sampled from µ, we can find the k such that i ∈ Pk .
r
µ, with probability at least 1 − δ, we can find m1 , . . . , mr such
Using s = 6r
ǫ2 log δ samples from P
that mk ≤ |Pk | for all k ∈ [r], and k∈[r] pk (|Pk | − mk ) ≤ 4ǫ.
Proof. Take s samples from µ. For each k ∈ [r], let sk be the number of samples in Pk , each with
probability pk . We can easily see that E[sk ] = spk |Pk |.
If pk |Pk | ≥ 1/r, then by Chernoff bounds, we know that,
Pr [(1 − ǫ)E[sk ] ≤ sk ≤ (1 + ǫ)E[sk ]] ≥ 1 − 2e−ǫ
2 E[s
k ]/3
By the choice of s, with probability at least 1 − δ/r, (1 − ǫ)pk |Pk | ≤ ssk ≤ (1 + ǫ)pk |Pk |.
On the other hand, if pk |Pk | < 1/r, then by Chernoff bounds we have,
Pr pk |Pk | − rǫ ≤ ssk ≤ pk |Pk | + rǫ =
h
i
ǫ2 s
Pr 1 − rpkǫ|Pk | spk |Pk | ≤ sk ≤ 1 + rpkǫ|Pk | spk |Pk | ≥ 1 − 2 exp − 2
r pk |Pk |
≥ 1 − 2e−ǫ
2 s/3r
By the choice of s, with probability at least 1 − δ/r, pk |Pk | − rǫ ≤ ssk ≤ pk |Pk | + rǫ .
With probability at least 1 − δ, we get an estimate αk = sk /s for every k ∈ [r] such that
αk ≤ max {pk |Pk | + ǫ/r, pk Pk (1 + ǫ)}, and αk ≥ min {pk |Pk | − ǫ/r, (1 − ǫ)pk |Pk |}. From now on
we assume that αk satisfies the above bounds, and define α′k = min {αk − ǫ/r, αk /(1 + ǫ)}. Notice
that α′k ≤ pk |Pk |. Furthermore, α′k ≥ min {pk |Pk | − 2ǫ/r, (1 − 2ǫ)pk |Pk |}. Set mk = ⌈α′k /pk ⌉. Since
α′k /pk ≤ |Pk | ∈ Z, we have mk ≤ |Pk | for all k.
27
P
P
Now, k∈[r] pk (|Pk | − mk ) ≤ k∈[r] (pk |P | − α′k ). Under the above assumption on the value of
αk , for every k such that pk |Pk | < 1/r, we have α′k ≥ pk |Pk | − 2ǫ/r. Hence, this difference is at
most 2ǫ/r. For every k such that pk |Pk | ≥ 1/r,
α′k ≥ (1 − 2ǫ)pk |Pk |. For any such k, the difference
P
pk |Pk | − α′k is at most 2ǫpk |Pk |. Therefore, k∈[r] pk (|Pk | − mk ) is at most 4ǫ.
Proof of Lemma 12.1. Given a distribution µ and an interval partition I = (I1 , I2 , . . . , Ir ), let µ be
the distribution presented by the ǫ/8-trimming sampler in Lemma 13.6. Let Ij,k ⊆ [n] be the set
k−1
ǫ
. Thus, each interval Ij in I is now split into
of indexes i such that i ∈ Ij and µ(i) = (1+ǫ/8)
8n
subsets Ij,0 , Ij,1 , Ij,2 , . . . , Ij,ℓ , where ℓ ≤ log n log(8/ǫ)/ log 2 (1 + ǫ/8) and Ij,0 is the set of indexes in
Ij such that µ(i) = 0.
Using Lemma 13.6, with s = r · poly(log n, 1/ǫ, log(1/δ)) samples from the distribution µ, we
can estimate, with probability at least 1 − δ, the values mj,k such that mj,k ≤ |Ij,k | for all k > 0,
and the following holds.
X (1+ǫ/8)k−1 ǫ
(Ij,k − mj,k ) ≤ ǫ/10.
8n
j,k:k>0
P
For every j, let MIj be the inventory provided by mj,1 , . . . , mj,ℓ and mj,0 = |Ij |− k∈[ℓ] mj,k . Thus,
we have a inventory sequence M̃I = (MI1 , MI2 , . . . , MIr ) that is ǫ/10-close in value-distance to the
corresponding atlas of µ (where we need to add the interval {0} to the partition to cover its entire
support). Corresponding to M̃I , there is a vector µ̃ that is ǫ/10-close to µ. Using Lemma 13.4,
we have a distribution µ̂ that is ǫ/2-close to µ. Since the [n] portion of µ is ǫ/2-close to µ, by the
triangle inequality, µ̂ is ǫ-close to µ. Thus A = (I, MI ), where MI is obtained by multiplying all
members of M̃I by the same factor used to produce µ̂ from µ̃, is an atlas for a distribution that is
ǫ-close to µ.
We need s · poly(log n, log s, 1/ǫ, log(1/δ) conditional samples from µ to get s samples from µ.
Therefore, we require r ·poly(log n, 1/ǫ, log(1/δ)) conditional samples to construct the atlas AI .
References
[AAK+ 07] Noga Alon, Alexandr Andoni, Tali Kaufman, Kevin Matulef, Ronitt Rubinfeld, and
Ning Xie, Testing k-wise and almost k-wise independence, Proceedings of the Thirtyninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’07, ACM, 2007,
pp. 496–505.
[ACK15]
Jayadev Acharya, Clément L. Canonne, and Gautam Kamath, A chasm between identity
and equivalence testing with conditional queries, Approximation, Randomization, and
Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques, APPROX/RANDOM 2015,
August 24-26, 2015, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2015, pp. 449–466.
[ADK15]
Jayadev Acharya, Constantinos Daskalakis, and Gautam Kamath, Optimal testing for
properties of distributions, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, December 7-12, 2015,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Corinna Cortes, Neil D. Lawrence, Daniel D. Lee, Masashi
Sugiyama, and Roman Garnett, eds.), 2015, pp. 3591–3599.
[BFF+ 01] Tugkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Eldar Fischer, Ravi Kumar, Ronitt Rubinfeld, and
Patrick White, Testing random variables for independence and identity, 42nd Annual
28
Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2001, 14-17 October 2001, Las
Vegas, Nevada, USA, 2001, pp. 442–451.
[BFR+ 00] Tugkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Warren D. Smith, and Patrick White,
Testing that distributions are close, 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2000, 12-14 November 2000, Redondo Beach, California, USA,
IEEE Computer Society, 2000, pp. 259–269.
[BKR04]
Tugkan Batu, Ravi Kumar, and Ronitt Rubinfeld, Sublinear algorithms for testing
monotone and unimodal distributions, Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Chicago, IL, USA, June 13-16, 2004 (László Babai, ed.),
ACM, 2004, pp. 381–390.
[Can15]
Clément L. Canonne, A survey on distribution testing: Your data is big. but is it blue?,
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 22 (2015), 63.
[CDGR15] Clément L. Canonne, Ilias Diakonikolas, Themis Gouleakis, and Ronitt Rubinfeld, Testing shape restrictions of discrete distributions, CoRR abs/1507.03558 (2015).
[CFGM13] Sourav Chakraborty, Eldar Fischer, Yonatan Goldhirsh, and Arie Matsliah, On the
power of conditional samples in distribution testing, Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS ’13, Berkeley, CA, USA, January 9-12, 2013, 2013, pp. 561–580.
[CRS15]
Clément L. Canonne, Dana Ron, and Rocco A. Servedio, Testing probability distributions using conditional samples, SIAM J. Comput. 44 (2015), no. 3, 540–616.
[Dia16]
Ilias Diakonikolas, Learning structured distributions, Handbook of Big Data (2016), 267.
[DK16]
Ilias Diakonikolas and Daniel M. Kane, A new approach for testing properties of discrete
distributions, CoRR abs/1601.05557 (2016).
[DLM+ 07] Ilias Diakonikolas, Homin K. Lee, Kevin Matulef, Krzysztof Onak, Ronitt Rubinfeld,
Rocco A. Servedio, and Andrew Wan, Testing for concise representations, 48th Annual
IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2007), October 20-23,
2007, Providence, RI, USA, Proceedings, 2007, pp. 549–558.
[GR00]
Oded Goldreich and Dana Ron, On testing expansion in bounded-degree graphs, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 7 (2000), no. 20.
[Hoe]
Wassily Hoeffding, Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, no. 1963, 13–30.
[ILR12]
Piotr Indyk, Reut Levi, and Ronitt Rubinfeld, Approximating and testing k-histogram
distributions in sub-linear time, Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACTSIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 2012, Scottsdale, AZ,
USA, May 20-24, 2012, 2012, pp. 15–22.
[Pan08]
Liam Paninski, A coincidence-based test for uniformity given very sparsely sampled
discrete data, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 54 (2008), no. 10, 4750–4755.
29
[Ser10]
Rocco A. Servedio, Testing by implicit learning: A brief survey, Property Testing Current Research and Surveys [outgrow of a workshop at the Institute for Computer
Science (ITCS) at Tsinghua University, January 2010], 2010, pp. 197–210.
[VV10]
Gregory Valiant and Paul Valiant, A CLT and tight lower bounds for estimating entropy,
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 17 (2010), 179.
[VV14]
, An automatic inequality prover and instance optimal identity testing, 55th IEEE
Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2014, Philadelphia,
PA, USA, October 18-21, 2014, 2014, pp. 51–60.
30
| 8cs.DS
|
AngularJS in the Wild: A Survey with 460 Developers
Miguel Ramos
Marco Tulio Valente
arXiv:1608.02012v3 [cs.SE] 27 Sep 2016
UFMG, Brazil
{miguel,mtov}@dcc.ufmg.br
Ricardo Terra
Gustavo Santos
UFLA, Brazil
[email protected]
RMoD Team, INRIA, France
[email protected]
Abstract
To implement modern web applications, a new family of
JavaScript frameworks has emerged, using the MVC pattern.
Among these frameworks, the most popular one is A NGU LAR JS, which is supported by Google. In spite of its popularity, there is not a clear knowledge on how A NGULAR JS
design and features affect the development experience of
Web applications. Therefore, this paper reports the results of
a survey about A NGULAR JS, including answers from 460
developers. Our contributions include the identification of
the most appreciated features of A NGULAR JS (e.g., custom
interface components, dependency injection, and two-way
data binding) and the most problematic aspects of the framework (e.g., performance and implementation of directives).
Categories and Subject Descriptors D.3.3 [Frameworks]
Keywords JavaScript, AngularJS, MVC frameworks.
1.
Introduction
JavaScript is a fundamental piece of modern Web applications. It was initially designed as a scripting language to extend web pages with small executable code. However, the
language is used nowadays to construct a variety of complex systems (Kienle 2010; Silva et al. 2015). As a result, we are observing the birth of new technologies and
tools—including JavaScript libraries and frameworks—to
solve common problems faced in the development of such
applications. For example, frameworks following the ModelView-Controller (MVC) architecture pattern (or variations
of it) are widely used nowadays, including systems such as
A NGULAR JS, BACKBONE . JS, and E MBER . JS. Among these
frameworks, A NGULAR JS is probably the most popular one.
This fact is evidenced by comparing the number of Google
searches (the most queried framework since 2013), the num-
ber of contributors in GitHub and the increasing number of
questions and answers in Stack Overflow (the framework
with more Q&A since mid-2013).
However, despite the increasing practical interest on A N GULAR JS, there is no clear knowledge on how the design
and features proposed by this framework affect the development experience of JavaScript software. More specifically, it
is not clear what are the most appreciated features of A N GULAR JS, what are the main problems faced by developers when using the framework, and which aspects of A N GULAR JS can be improved. Answers to these questions are
important to different developers. First, developers who use
A NGULAR JS can learn how to improve this usage and also
how to avoid bad A NGULAR JS programming practices. Second, developers who do not use JavaScript MVC frameworks
can understand the benefits and problems related to these
frameworks, by reviewing the case of A NGULAR JS. Third,
MVC framework builders can use our results to design more
powerful and usable frameworks.
This paper reports the results of a survey with 460 developers, when we collected their perceptions about A NGU LAR JS. We reveal the relevant features of the framework,
e.g., custom components, dependency injection, and twoway data binding. We also shed light on the most frequent
problems faced by A NGULAR JS developers, e.g., due to the
complexity of the API to declare directives.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces A NGULAR JS. Section 3 documents the
survey design and Section 4 presents the survey results.
Threats to validity are presented in Section 5. Section 6 discusses related work and Section 7 concludes.
2.
AngularJS in a Nutshell
In this section, we briefly describe the key components of
A NGULAR JS. A basic understanding of these components
is important to interpret our survey results.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee
provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and
the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored.
Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists, contact
the Owner/Author(s). Request permissions from [email protected] or Publications Dept., ACM, Inc., fax +1 (212)
869-0481.
Modules: An A NGULAR JS application is a set of modules,
which act as containers to the different parts of the application. Modules can also depend on other modules.
PLATEAU ’16, November 01 2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Copyright © 2016 held by owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
ACM 978-1-4503-4638-2/16/11. . . $15.00
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3001878.3001881
Services: A NGULAR JS services are objects that encapsulate
code related with a specific concern. They are instantiated
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
< html lang = " en " ng-app = " todomvc " >
...
< header id = " header " >
<h1 > todos </ h1 >
< form ng-submit = " addTodo () " >
< input placeholder = " What needs to be done ? "
ng-model = " newTodo " / >
</ form >
</ header >
...
</ html >
Listing 1. Template sample
only once by factories or constructor functions. The created
singleton object is shared by the components that depend
on it (e.g., controllers, directives, filters, and other services).
Typically, A NGULAR JS services are stateless objects with
a set of methods that deal with specific concerns, such
as server requests, manipulation of arrays, asynchronous
operations, etc. A NGULAR JS also provides built-in services
to deal with common concerns in Web applications, such as
$http, $filter, and $timeout.
Templates: In Web applications, HTML documents are
parsed to generate the DOM (Document Object Model),
which is the data structure that models the final document
presented to users. A NGULAR JS supports DOM-based templates, which are written in HTML and contain proprietary
elements and attributes to render the dynamic interface of
web applications. Listing 1 shows a sample template. It
includes the definition of the document (html element in
line 1) and the markup for the main input of the application,
which is represented by the form element (line 5).
Directives: Directives are specific HTML markers used
in templates to define the UI behavior. In Listing 1, the
ng-app attribute (line 1) is an A NGULAR JS directive that
specifies the root node of the application. When directives
are executed by A NGULAR JS they can modify the DOM
structure and also register event handlers. During the
compilation process, A NGULAR JS traverses the DOM and
searches for all directives. The directives are executed in
order of priority generating the final DOM presented to
users. Directives can (1) use the same scope of the parent
element; (2) create a scope that inherits from the scope of
the parent element; or (3) create a completely new scope. It
is also possible to create custom directives.
Expressions: A NGULAR JS expressions are delimited by
double curly brackets ({{expression}}) or are the values
of some directive attributes. Literals (e.g., arrays ([]),
objects ({})), operators, and variables are examples of
elements that can be used in expressions. Expressions are
evaluated using a context represented by an object, called
scope. Variables and functions used in expressions must be
defined in the scope object. During the template compilation, when the ng-app directive is parsed, A NGULAR JS
creates an object representing the main application scope,
which is referenced as the $rootScope. Since directives
can define different scopes from $rootScope, expressions
from different parts of the template may be evaluated under
different scopes. When the value of an expression changes,
A NGULAR JS updates the view accordingly.
Controllers: A NGULAR JS controllers are used to initialize
the state of an application and provide an interface to update
it. Controllers are used with the ngController directive.
When this directive is used in a template, it receives the
name of a controller and the scope created by the directive
is passed as a parameter to the specified controller. The
controller must populate the scope object with properties
and methods that are used when evaluating expressions.
Digest Cycle: A NGULAR JS constantly maintains in sync the
state of the application with the view presented to the final
user. The framework provides this synchronization by comparing the current value of all variables in the scope referenced by the template expressions with their previous values. When a change is detected, the framework adequately
updates the DOM, in a process known as digest cycle.
3.
Survey Design
First, we performed a Mapping Study (Section 3.1) to gather
information about A NGULAR JS. We relied on the results
of this first study to construct the survey. The survey participants were selected among Stack Overflow users (Section 3.2).
3.1
Mapping Study
We use a mapping study to gather information about the use
of A NGULAR JS. A mapping study is more flexible than a
systematic review and it is recommended for studying emergent fields or technologies (Wohlin et al. 2012). For example, information about A NGULAR JS is primarily found in
blogs, forums, and Q&A sites. Therefore, using the Google
search engine, we initially focused on finding documents reporting the benefits and disadvantages of A NGULAR JS. To
this purpose, we used search queries such as “the best features of AngularJS” or “the bad parts of AngularJS”. We also
used two other strategies to reach more sources of information. First, we recursively accessed the references in the sites
already reviewed (a practice called “snowballing”). Second,
we performed additional search queries for frequently mentioned topics. As an example, we searched for “transclusion directives”, due to the frequency of references to this
topic as a complex A NGULAR JS concept. During the revision of blogs, we only considered well-written posts, by
authors with experience in software development. A complete list of the posts we consider is available in a companion
website.1 Finally, these documents were analyzed and classified by identifying topic trends, which were used for the
survey design.
1 https:// github.com/ aserg-ufmg/ angularjs-survey
Figure 1. Selecting the survey participants
3.2
Survey Construction and Participants
As a result of the mapping study, we built a 15-minute survey with 25 questions, organized in seven sections: (1) background of the participants, (2) key characteristics of A NGU LAR JS, (3) problems with A NGULAR JS templates, (4) debugging and testing, (5) development practices, (6) complex
concepts and features, and (7) A NGULAR JS 2.0. To avoid
unreliable responses, we asked developers to skip the questions they did not feel confident to answer. All the scales
used in the survey have an even number of points, to force
participants to make a choice. In multiple choice questions,
when the respondents could provide a response not included
in the set of answers, we included an Other option.
To find participants, we used the Stack Exchange API2
to search for A NGULAR JS developers in the Stack Overflow
community. As illustrated in Figure 1, we retrieved all existing tags with the substring “angularjs”. We retrieved 120,696
questions and 153,689 answers containing these tags. Next,
we extracted data about three types of users: users who own
a question (QO); users who own an answer (AO); or users
who edited a question or answer (E). In this way, we collected a total of 74,005 users. To find their e-mail address,
we matched each user nickname at StackOverflow with an
equivalent nickname at GitHub. In this way, we obtained a
total of 20,695 matched users (28%). However, only 8,084
users (10.9%) had public contact information at GitHub. In
a last step, 7,157 users were marked as potential participants in the survey, because they have valid e-mail address
and at least one operation with the collected answers that is
not a simple edition. These users were ranked considering
the number of A NGULAR JS-related questions and answers
at Stack Overflow. Each user received the following score:
S = QO +3∗AO, where QO is number of questions owned
by the user and AO is the number of answers he owns. We
gave an additional weight to answers since users who pro2 https:// api.stackexchange.com
vide answers tend to have more experience than those who
are looking for them.
We randomly selected 30 users from the middle of the
rank, with scores between 9 and 24, to run a pilot survey.
Their feedback helped us to correct typographical errors and
ambiguities in some questions. However, the most important
change was in the structure of some questions. In the initial survey version, we used ranking questions, when survey
respondents have to rank a list of items in order of importance. After this pilot study, we decided to change to rating
questions (when respondents just have to rank each item in
a scale ranging from 1 to 4) because some participants complained about the time to answer ranking questions. Due to
these changes in the survey, the responses obtained during
the pilot phase were discarded.
The final version of the survey—which is also available
in our companion website—was first sent to a group of 60
users. This time, we received complete responses and an improved response rate. Therefore, we extended the invitation
to the rest of the users by daily emailing groups of nearly
700 users from the top of the ranking. At one point, we decided to stop due to replies from developers saying that they
had a limited experience with A NGULAR JS. In total, we sent
the survey to 3,060 users with score between 3 and 831. We
received 460 complete responses, representing a response
rate of 15%. The survey was open during approximately one
month (from early November to early December 2015).
4.
Survey Results
4.1
Background
Figure 2 reveals the participants background. The majority
of the respondents (97.6%) have at least one year of experience in JavaScript (Figure 2(a)), and 74.8% have one to
three years of experience with A NGULAR JS (Figure 2(b)).
For 37.4% of the developers, the largest application implemented with A NGULAR JS has more than 10 KLOC (Fig-
(a) JavaScript experience
(b) AngularJS experience
(c) Largest application
Custom interface components
452 (98%)
Dependency injection
452 (98%)
Two−way data binding
451 (98%)
Behavior specified in HTML
440 (96%)
Predefined components
439 (95%)
Templates directly in HTML
447 (97%)
One solution to many problems
434 (94%)
Modeling with POJOs
443 (96%)
Ease of tests
428 (93%)
Google support
445 (97%)
40
20
0
1 (not valuable)
20
40
Percentage
2
3
60
80
Number of answers
Figure 2. Respondents’ background
100
4 (very valuable)
Figure 3. Key features and characteristics of AngularJS
ure 2(c)). Therefore, we can conclude that at least the participants are not novice A NGULAR JS developers.
6. Ease of writing tests: A NGULAR JS provides the ngMock
module to simulate logging operations, HTTP reqs, etc.
4.2
7. Two-way data binding: A NGULAR JS provides synchronization between data in the view and in the model.
Key Characteristics and Features of AngularJS
We asked developers about the the following features:
1. Pre-defined components for code organization: A NGU LAR JS has different components to modularize code,
which may help in separation of concerns.
2. Dependency injection: This design pattern is used by
A NGULAR JS to manage dependencies between components, to reduce coupling and increase testability.
3. Use of POJOs in model components: In A NGULAR JS,
models are implemented using Plain Old JavaScript Objects (POJOs). There is no need to extend proprietary
classes, for example, to provide accessor methods.
4. Templates in HTML: A NGULAR JS uses DOM-based
templates to simplify data binding operations, event mapping, and updating of large interface components.
5. Support to custom components: Custom directives can be
used as a DSL to define reusable UI components.
8. Use of HTML to declare UI behavior: The UI, including
its behavior, is defined in standard HTML documents.
9. One solution to manage many problems: A NGULAR JS
is an “opinionated framework”, meaning that its design
handles common decisions related with Web apps.
10. Supported by Google: This support may guarantee the
evolution and constant maintenance of the project.
Figure 3 reports the value given by developers to these
characteristics and features, ranging from not valuable
(score 1) to very valuable (score 4). At the right of the charts,
we include the number of answers of each item. Each individual item was rated by at least 93% of the participants.
The top-3 features with more positive scores are the support to custom components, the use of dependency injection,
and the support for two-way data binding. The characteristic
439 (95%)
Dump/Debug problems
449 (98%)
Modularity and SOC loss
434 (94%)
Low readability of HTML
448 (97%)
80
70
60
50
40
1 (never)
30 20 10
Percentage
2
3
0
10
20
30
Number of answers
Silent failures
40
4 (very often)
Figure 4. How often these items represent a real problem caused by using code in A NGULAR JS templates?
with the lowest number of positive answers is Google support, with 45.2% of the respondents seeing it as having no
value (score 1) or limited value (score 2).
4.3
Code in HTML Templates
In the mapping study, we detected four possible problems
related to placing code in A NGULAR JS templates:
1. Silent failures: In A NGULAR JS, when undefined functions or objects are used in templates no exceptions are
raised. As a consequence, applications might fail silently.
2. Code hard to debug: Since the code used in A NGULAR JS
templates is not pure JavaScript, it is not possible, for
example, to define break points.
3. Low readability: A NGULAR JS code might be spread all
over the HTML document, hindering readability.
4. Modularity and Separation of Concerns: The use of large
amount of JavaScript code in HTML is often seen as bad
smell (Nguyen et al. 2012), which might hinder separation of concerns.
We asked developers whether these issues are real problems in their daily development. In this case, the score 1
means the issue was never a problem and a score 4 means
it is a very frequent problem. As shown in Figure 4, none
of the issues have a major detrimental impact, according to
the respondents; they have at least 60% of the answers in the
low part of the scale (scores 1 or 2).
In a separate question, we asked if the developers had at
least once used large amounts of logic in HTML templates
and 26.3% of them answered positively. Since this is not a
recommended practice, we asked them to indicate possible
reasons for their decision The two most voted reasons are
A NGULAR JS design (54.8%) and the lack of experience in
A NGULAR JS (43.5%). Lack of experience in Web architecture and in JavaScript were also voted (20.9% and 4.3%, respectively). We also gave the respondents the possibility to
indicate other reasons, which were provided by 31 developers. These reasons include, for example, tight deadlines, special cases, easiness or laziness, prototyping purposes, etc.
4.4
Testing
First, we asked the participants to rate the frequency they
make use of mocking (provided by the ngMock module)
when testing their systems. From 441 answers, 72.8% indicated they never or rarely use this module (scores 1 or
2). Possible reasons for this result include limited usefulness of ngMock features, unfamiliarity with the module, and
few developers putting testing into practice. We also asked
the participants to rank how complex is testing A NGULAR JS
components, from very easy to very difficult. As presented in
Figure 5, services, filters, controllers, and providers received
the higher number of answers with scores 1 and 2. The reason is that these components are very common and usually
do not include complex code or code that deals with complex APIs. For example, most code in filters only make string
transformations. By contrast, the two components more difficult to test are transclusion directives and directives with
external templates. Probably, developers find these directives more difficult to test because they demand a deeper understanding of A NGULAR JS concepts. For example, when
creating directives, there are different types of transclusion,
different types of scopes, and different ways to interact with
the DOM API.
4.5
Complex Concepts and Features
We asked the participants to evaluate several characteristics of A NGULAR JS, which were originally identified in the
337 (73%)
Directives with external templates
350 (76%)
Simple HTML directives
371 (81%)
Providers
361 (78%)
Controllers
386 (84%)
Filters
369 (80%)
Services
381 (83%)
80
60
40
1 (very easy)
20
0
Percentage
2
3
20
40
Number of answers
Transclusion directives
60
4 (very difficult)
Performance degradation details
413 (90%)
Transclusion directives API
397 (86%)
Directive scopes
424 (92%)
Compile, link and controller functions
424 (92%)
Correct use of $scope.$apply
425 (92%)
Dependency registration methods
419 (91%)
Scopes prototypal inheritance
414 (90%)
External components integration
416 (90%)
Dependency injection methods
419 (91%)
80
60
40
1 (very simple)
20
0
20
Percentage
2
3
40
60
Number of answers
Figure 5. How difficult is it to test these A NGULAR JS components?
80
4 (very complex)
Figure 6. How complex are the the following A NGULAR JS aspects and features?
mapping study as complex concepts. The following characteristics were proposed: (1) use of different scopes in directives; (2) use of prototypes to simulate scope inheritance; (3)
different types of entities to register dependencies; (4) compile, link, and controller functions (necessary to implement
DOM-related directives); (5) transclusion directives; (6) correct use of $scope.$apply to manually trigger the digest
cycle; (7) tackling of performance degradation details; (8)
integration with external components and plug-ins; and (9)
correct usage of the syntax to inject dependencies (in order
to avoid unexpected results when minifying the code).
Figure 6 summarizes the developers’ classification from
very simple concept (score 1) to very complex one (score 4).
Tackling all the details that can lead to performance degradation was rated by 76% of the participants as a complex task.
The next three items in terms of complexity are transclusion
directives, the different scopes that can be used when building directives, and the correct use of the functions compile,
link, and controller. All these items are somehow re-
Integration with ES6 modules
New API for UI components definition
Component router
New mechanism for change detection
New mobile features
Server rendering
New template syntax
New API for dependency injection
No more $scope.$apply
Execution time measurement service
Other
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percent of developers
Figure 7. Most expected A NGULAR JS 2.0 features
lated with the implementation of directives. The remaining
items were rated as more simple than complex, mainly the
integration with external components and the use of the correct syntax to inject dependencies.
In a separate question, we asked the developers about the
frequency they create directives. As a result, 83.5% of the
participants answered they often or very often create their
own directives. Despite this fact, many tasks and features
related to the implementation of directives are usually considered complex by the survey participants.
4.6
• The two problems that arise more frequently regarding
the use of code in A NGULAR JS templates are the emergence of silent failures and the difficulty to dump/debug
the variables referenced in the HTML. New debug tools
and techniques can then be developed to alleviate these
problems faced by developers.
AngularJS 2.0
To reveal the most expected features or improvements in
A NGULAR JS 2.0, we selected the following features that
appeared in the mapping study: (1) the new API to define the main UI building blocks; (2) Zone.js (no more
$scope.$apply()); (3) server rendering; (4) the new logging service, called diary.js; (5) new mobile features (e.g.
support for touch event gestures); (6) the new template syntax; (7) the new change detection mechanism; (8) the new
API for injecting dependencies; (9) integration with ECMAScript 6 (ES6) modules; (10) component router, which
allows asynchronous loading.
Figure 7 indicates that the most expected feature is the
integration with ES6 modules (68.3%). The second most
expected feature is the new API to create UI components,
which is expected because the current API is perceived by
most developers as difficult to use and understand (see Section 4.5). The third most expected feature is the component
router, which allows the dynamic loading of UI components,
followed by the new change detection mechanism.
4.7
ponents by means of custom directives, the use of dependency injection, and the ease to set up two-way data binding. Therefore, JavaScript MVC framework builders can
embrace these characteristics and improve them by offering a more simple interface to build reusable UI components (without exposing final users to internal concepts
and decisions) and by using better mechanisms to detect
changes in the model (i.e., mechanisms that reduce the
number of details to be considered).
Key Findings and Implications
The main findings of our survey are as follows:
• Three characteristics of A NGULAR JS excel by the value
that developers give to them: the ability to create UI com-
• The two main reasons for placing large amounts of logic
in templates are the lack of experience in A NGULAR JS
and the design of the framework. This shows the importance of correctly training developers before they start to
use A NGULAR JS on complex applications. It also reveals
an opportunity for framework builders to investigate new
framework designs.
• The components that are more difficult to test in A NGU LAR JS are directives, mainly the ones using transclusion;
the remaining components (i.e., controllers, services, filters, etc.) are mostly considered easy to test.
5.
Threats to Validity
The first threat to validity relates to the execution of the mapping study. Due to the large amount of information on the
Internet about A NGULAR JS, it is possible that literature addressing more specific topics about the framework or presenting different points of view was not included.
Regarding the construction of the questionnaire, the main
threat is the insertion of ambiguous and leading questions.
We made our best to avoid this problem by constantly reviewing and improving the proposed questions. Additionally, we ran a pilot survey to identify and correct this type of
questions. In some questions, we also gave the participants
the opportunity to respond with an answer different from the
proposed ones by adding an “Other” option. Furthermore,
with the exception of the background questions, no question
was mandatory. Therefore, participants were not forced to
provide answers when they did not want or when they were
not sure about their answers.
There are also two threats related to the method used
to retrieve the participants’ e-mails. The first one is related
with the match between the Stack Overflow profile and the
GitHub profile of the participants. It is possible that a Stack
Overflow user has been matched with a homonym user in
GitHub (i.e., users who have exactly the same login name,
but who are different people). Additionally, it is possible
that the heuristic used to assess and rank the expertise of
the selected developers does not reflect the reality.
There are also some aspects that limit the generalization
of our results (external validity). First, the sample for the survey was selected only from the Stack Overflow community.
Therefore, it is possible that the findings in this study do not
apply to a different population. Moreover, constant and rapid
changes in Web development environments, including new
technologies and new versions of A NGULAR JS, can lead to
different results if the study is repeated in the future.
Finally, we have to mention threats related to human
behavior. For instance, we can mention the ordering of the
questions since one may provide context for the next one.
Another threat is the attitude of the participants towards the
topic of research. Their responses can introduce bias to make
A NGULAR JS appear in a positive or negative light. We can
mention the case of one participant who declared that he is a
contributor of the A NGULAR JS project.
Ocariza et al. (2015) proposed two types of inconsistencies that can be found in A NGULAR JS applications: (i) when
identifiers used in one layer are undefined in the lower layer;
and (ii) when values assigned to a variable, or returned by
a function, do not match their type in the view. According to the authors, both inconsistencies are not easily caught
during development and might cause bugs. However, in our
survey, only 39% of the respondents considered that silent
failures, corresponding to identifier inconsistency, are real
problems in their daily development. Moreover, 84.5% of
the respondents considered two-way data binding, which relates to type consistency, as a valuable feature. Both results
shed light over real problems developers face when they
use A NGULAR JS.
7.
Conclusion
This paper reported an empirical study about different aspects of A NGULAR JS based on opinions and experiences of
developers. Our main contributions include the identification
of the most appreciated features of A NGULAR JS (e.g., custom interface components, dependency injection, and twoway data binding) and the most problematic aspects of the
framework (e.g., performance degradation and implementation of directives). Future work includes an analysis of the
results using statistical tests. Interviews with A NGULAR JS
developers can also contribute to strengthen our findings.
Acknowledgments
Our research is supported by FAPEMIG and CNPq. We also
deeply thank the 460 developers who answered the survey.
References
B. Dobing and J. Parsons. How UML is used. Commununications
of the ACM, 49(5):109–113, 2006.
H. M. Kienle. It’s about time to take JavaScript (more) seriously.
IEEE Software, 27(3):60–62, 2010.
6.
Related Work
Some works have been focusing on practitioners’ use of
known technologies. Dobing and Parsons (2006) conducted
the first survey on how UML diagrams are used by practitioners and their clients. The authors gathered 182 responses
from analysts with average experience of 4.7 years in UML.
Class diagrams are being used regularly by the majority of
the respondents, followed by Sequence and Use Case diagrams. Some of the reasons why a UML diagram is not used
vary from “not well understood by analysts” to “insufficient
value to justify the cost”. In another study, Petre (2013) reported two years of interviews with practitioners. Most of
them (35 out of 50) currently do not use UML at all, due to
notation overhead, lack of context, etc. Both work highlight
the complexity of UML. They also suggest that more tooling
is needed for both newcomers and professionals in order to
use the language more effectively.
H. V. Nguyen, H. A. Nguyen, T. T. Nguyen, A. T. Nguyen, and T. N.
Nguyen. Detection of embedded code smells in dynamic web
applications. In 27th International Conference on Automated
Software Engineering (ASE), pages 282–285, 2012.
F. Ocariza, K. Pattabiraman, and A. Mesbah. Detecting inconsistencies in JavaScript MVC applications. In 37th International
Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 325–335,
2015.
M. Petre. UML in practice. In 35th International Conference on
Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 722–731, 2013.
L. Silva, M. Ramos, M. T. Valente, N. Anquetil, and A. Bergel.
Does Javascript software embrace classes? In 22nd International
Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering
(SANER), pages 73–82, 2015.
C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and
A. Wesslén. Experimentation in software engineering. Springer,
2012.
| 6cs.PL
|
A Framework in CRM Customer Lifecycle: Identify Downward
Trend and Potential Issues Detection
1
2
1
2
2
Kun Hu , Zhe Li , Ying Liu , Luyin Cheng , Qi Yang , and Yan Li
2
Abstract
Customer retention is one of the primary goals in the area of customer relationship
management. A mass of work exists in which machine learning models or business rules are
established to predict churn. However, targeting users at an early stage when they start to
show a downward trend is a better strategy. In downward trend prediction, the reasons why
customers show a downward trend is of great interest in the industry as it helps the business
to understand the pain points that customers suffer and to take early action to prevent them
from churning. A commonly used method is to collect feedback from customers by either
aggressively reaching out to them or by passively hearing from them. However, it is believed
that there are a large number of customers who have unpleasant experiences and never speak
out. In the literature, there is limited research work that provides a comprehensive and
scientific approach to identify these “silent suffers”.
In this study, we propose a novel two-part framework: developing the downward prediction
process and establishing the methodology to identify the reasons why customers are in the
downward trend. In the first prediction part, we focus on predicting the downward trend,
which is an earlier stage of the customer lifecycle compared to churn. In the second part, we
propose an approach to figuring out the cause (of the downward trend) based on a causal
inference method and semi-supervised learning. The proposed approach is capable of
identifying potential silent sufferers. We take bad shopping experiences as inputs to develop
the framework and validate it via a marketing A/B test in the real world. The test readout
demonstrates the effectiveness of the framework by driving 88.5% incremental lift in purchase
volume.
Keywords
Customer Relationship Management, Semi-supervised learning, Customer Retention,
Downward Prediction
1
eBay Research & Engineering, Shanghai, China
eBay e-Commerce, Shanghai, China
Email Address: [email protected] (Kun Hu), [email protected] (Zhe Li), [email protected] (Ying Liu),
[email protected] (Luyin Cheng), [email protected] (Qi Yang), [email protected] (Yan Li)
1
2
1. Introduction
Customer retention is always one of the primary goals of the customer relationship
management (CRM) field, because it brings direct value to the business (Chen and Popovich,
2003). However, in the customer lifecycle, some of the users churn for various reason. It is
reasonable to try to “rescue” these churned customers since it is expensive to acquire new
customers. An ideal approach to save customers is in the early stage, when they first shows a
downward trend. To achieve this goal, two steps should be considered. The first one is to
predict the propensity of the downward trend of a customer after a target length of time.
Next, for a customer with a high propensity of a downward trend, we need to understand the
cause of the issue. Depending on the cause, it is possible to execute personalized “rescue”
plans – for instance, sending marketing messages, or providing incentives and relevant
merchandise recommendations via multiple marketing channels.
There is some of the existing work using machine-learning methods which predict
churned customers who stop doing business with a company for a certain period of time
(Kamalraj and Malathi, 2013; Almana and Aksoy et al., 2014). Support vector machines are
applied in the churn prediction of newspaper subscribers (Coussement and Van den Poel,
2008). Churn prediction is also widely used in telecommunication industry (Wei and Chiu,
2002; Lee and Lee et al., 2017), e-commerce retailers (Subramanya and Somani, 2017), social
network (Óskarsdóttir and Bravo et al., 2017) and online new media (Yuan and Bai et al., 2017).
In addition, methods are proposed to improve prediction accuracy; for instance, handling of
imbalanced data, which usually happens in the customer relationship management field due
to lack of positive cases (Burez and Van den Poel, 2009; Xie and Li et al., 2009). Although a
large amount of research exists which concentrates on user churn, customer downward trend
prediction is quite different as the customers are still active. Currently, no widely accepted
definition exists that identifies the targeted customers with a downward trend. Lack of existing
research design drives a necessity to develop a method for exploring the cause of downward
trend.
In this work, we propose a framework to find the target population and causes, and
making it possible for a company to address the issues implicitly or explicitly in their
communication. We propose a scientific framework leveraging machine-learning
methodology to manage the downward trend. To illustrate and demonstrate the
methodology, we take an example of an e-commerce company.
The framework consists of three parts. First, a methodology is proposed to identify
customers who are in the downward trend. Second, supervised learning models are built to
identify the customers who are in a downward trend. Finally, we leverage semi-supervised
machine learning to learn the potential causes, which later we call “levers” of the downward
trend, and find silent sufferers. We will use one common lever - bad customer experience
(BCE) to develop and demonstrate the method. Traditionally, if there are enough samples
labeled as BCE sufferers and non-BCE sufferers, the issue is easy to handle with supervised
learning method. However, not all of the customers are willing to express their BCE and thus
they are silent sufferers. Meanwhile, BCE counts can be high if the user has more activities,
and it is hard to establish the correlation between BCE and downward trend. Proposing a
2
correct solution is crucial to rescuing these customers. In addition, we perform an A/B test to
verify the performance of the model.
2. Methodology
2.1 Definition of Downward Trend
In this section, we will introduce the definition of a downward trend of the customer
lifecycle. A customer typically shows a downward trend in several aspects. In an e-commerce
company, gross merchandise volume (GMV), bought item count (BI) and purchase days (PD)
all are meaningful metrics to track customer status. For each of these metrics, we define the
downward flag respectively by the norm box method.
Fig 1. Downward Definition
Take the GMV as an example. Since consumption varies among customers, it is more
appropriate to observe the GMV trend per user, rather than observing the GMV trend of the
all customers. Hence, for each user, we first compute the average of the GMV 𝜇 in the past
12 months along with its standard deviation 𝑠 before a specified target time when we plan
to communicate with the customer. In the next month, if the GMV of the customer is under
the lower bound,
𝜇 − 𝛼𝑠
then we flag the user as being in a downward trend. 𝛼 determines the sensitivity of the
definition, i.e. a large 𝛼 indicates that we are less likely to classify a user as in the downward
trend; 𝛼 should be tuned to match the business case and it is reasonable to use different 𝛼
values for different customer groups. Figure 1 illustrates the method used to define the
downward flag. The dashed line is the average GMV of a customer in the past 12 months. The
orange box is the norm box corresponding to the upper bound 𝜇 + 𝛼𝑠 and the lower bound
th
𝜇 − 𝛼𝑠. If the user’s GMV in the 13 month is lower than the lower bound, then the user is in
a downward trend.
3
2.2 Modelling the Downward Propensity
Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) is a widely used machine learning method for both
regression and classification problems (Friedman, 2001). It shows strong performance in
solving a wide range of practical applications (Natekin and Knoll, 2013). In this work, we
leverage GBM to build binary classifiers to predict the downward trend of customers in the
next month. If the user is in a downward trend per our definition, the class label is 1 (positive
case); otherwise it is 0 (negative case). As mentioned in the previous section, three models
are built for different downward detection goals, including GMV, BI and PD. The
methodology is similar for the three metrics. Based on the purchase pattern of the customers,
we divide the customers into frequent buyers (FB) and infrequent buyers (IB). We choose
different norm box parameters 𝛼 to define the downward for FB and IB. Event rate is the
percentage of the positive case and obviously is decided by the 𝛼. Generally, a proper 𝛼
should be choose to make the event rate fit with the specific business case.
Table 1. Model Parameters
Model
Event Rate
𝛼 (FB)
𝛼 (IB)
GMV
BI
PD
9.65%
5.45%
7.32%
1
1.5
1.25
0.75
1
1
We have around 200 candidate predictors belonging to multiple categories. We list some
of them here:
Transaction: purchase date, item price, category seasonality, condition, quantity, shipping
methods.
Bad buying experience history.
Contact frequency and engagement
Site behaviors: browse, bid, offer, watch, messages, cart, search, and dwell time.
Demographics, acquisition channel
We first train rough GBM models using 200 trees and use a max depth of 5 for the 3
aspects. Based on the variable importance, we finalize the GBM model with 13 variables for
each model in order to reduce the computing resource of the features while retaining
acceptable prediction power. Table 2-4 shows the variables selected in each model.
Table 2. Variable Importance of GMV
Variable Description
Importance
Whether last month’s GMV is less than 0.75 std of previous 11 months’ GMV
1
Recent 30 days’ GMV ratio to past year
0.4221
Purchase days during past year
0.3543
Recent 180 days’ GMV ratio to past year
0.1746
Average of gap between purchase days in last month
0.0972
Last 30 days’ buying transactions ratio to past year
0.0961
Last 90 days’ GMV ratio to past year
0.0937
4
Medium of gap between purchase days
0.0928
Last 60 days’ GMV ratio to past year
0.0845
Standard deviation of gap between purchase days
0.0549
Whether last 3 months’ GMV is less than 0.75 std of previous 9 months GMV
0.0517
User country
0.0506
Whether last 2 months’ GMV is less than 0.75 std of previous 10 months GMV
0.0361
Table 3. Variable Importance of BI
Variable Description
Whether last month’s bought items is less than 1 std of previous 11 months’
bought items
Importance
1
Average of gap between purchase days in last month
0.4387
Medium of gap between purchase days
0.3253
Standard deviation of gap between purchase days
0.2705
Last 180 days’ items purchased ratio to past year
0.2588
Purchase days during past year
0.2407
Last 30 days’ items purchased ratio to past year
0.2164
Last 90 days’ items purchased ratio to past year
0.204
Last year’s items purchased count
0.1049
Whether last 3 months’ bought items is less than 1 std of previous 9 months’
bought items
0.0776
Last 30 days’ buying transactions ratio to past year
0.0757
Last 60 days’ items purchased ratio to past year
0.0708
User country
0.0431
Table 4. Variable Importance of PD
Variable Description
Importance
Purchase days during past year
1
Medium of gap between purchase days
0.64
Whether last month’s purchase days is less than 1 std of previous 11 months’
0.6221
purchase days
Average of gap between purchase days in last month
0.3376
Standard deviation of gap between purchase days
0.1687
Last 30 days’ buying transactions ratio to past year
0.1175
Medium of purchase days difference in last month
0.1003
User country
0.1001
Standard deviation of purchase days difference
0.0921
Whether last month’s bought items is less than 1 std of previous 11 months’
0.0908
bought items
Last 180 days’ buying transactions ratio to past year
0.0837
Average of purchase days difference
0.0572
Last 90 days’ buying transactions ratio to past year
0.0386
With the selected variables, we build GBM model for the three aspects using depths of 5
5
and 10. The detailed performance of the models can be found in Table 5. The performance is
decent: the AUC is beyond 0.90 for all of these models. Figure 3 shows the log loss of GMV
model along with the number of trees. 150 trees are efficient enough for prediction as the
log loss no longer decreases dramatically. Comparing the 5-depth and 10-depth model, an
obvious over-fitting issue can be observed in Figure 3 as the gap between the training and
validation group. Meanwhile, there is no significant improvement with the 10-depth model.
Thus, depth 5 model is selected as the final model. It is similar for the BI and PD models.
Figure 3 shows the ROC curve and Precision-Recall (PR) Curve of the three final models.
(a) Depth 5
(b) Depth 10
Figure 2. Log Loss of the GMV Model
In order to use the output of each model in practice, it is suggested to split the users into
buckets according to the deciles or percentiles of the prediction score rather than set a fixed
cut-off to assign positive or negative flags to the population. If bucket information is available,
then it is feasible to combine these three models into one ensemble model to predict the
downward trend. Each customer gets three buckets of the models output respectively, say
𝑦𝐺𝑀𝑉 , 𝑦𝐵𝐼 , 𝑦𝑃𝐷 . If the goal is to find as many downward customers as possible,
the 𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝑦𝐺𝑀𝑉 , 𝑦𝐵𝐼 , 𝑦𝑃𝐷 ) can be selected as the final bucket of that customer.
Table 5. Model Performance Metrics
Model
# Tree
depth
AUC
max f1
max min per class accuracy
GMB
150
5
0.90
0.47
0.82
BI
150
10
0.90
0.47
0.82
6
150
5
0.91
0.36
0.83
PD
150
10
0.91
0.37
0.83
150
5
0.90
0.42
0.82
150
10
0.91
0.42
0.82
(a) ROC Curve
(b) Precision-Recall Curve
Figure 2. Propensity Model ROC Curve and PR Curve
2.3 Issue Detection
In this section, we will propose a methodology to identify one or more downward levers,
which result in a downtrend trend. Generally, multiple causes lead a customer to a downward
trend. To illustrate the method, we mainly focus on the BCE issue as an example, but it is
convenient to apply the methodology to address other issues.
There are difficulties when considering some of the levers. Indeed, BCE issues are not
negatively correlated with a downward trend in the whole population. The reason is that active
customers tend to meet more BCE issues. The more transactions, the more chance a customer
will have a BCE. Moreover, some of the customers are not bothered by the reported BCE
because either the seller or customer service resolved the issue. Therefore, it is challenging
but also crucial to find the real sufferers who behave downward due to a BCE. In addition,
apart from customers who are willing to report their issues, there are a large group of BCE
sufferers who choose not to speak out. Traditional business rules are not able to target them.
7
Fig 3. General Procedure of the Lever Detection Framework
In order to accomplish the goal, we need to resolve two questions. The first question is
how to find the genuine sufferers from the BCE reporters. We name the genuine sufferer
group as the golden set. Casual inference is applied to establish the golden set. The second
question is how to detect the silent sufferers given the golden set; we use a semi-supervised
learning method to deal with this. Figure 3 shows the general procedure of the proposed
approach.
2.3.1 Casual Inference and Golden Set
To solve the first problem, we need to find a subset of the downward model population.
The downward trend (GMV/BI/PD) of the customers in this subset is due to a BCE. Causal
Inference is the theory of judging the relationship between two continuous variables. It helps
to identify the cause or causes of a phenomenon (Shaughnessy and Zechmeister, 1985). For
example, the method is used to detect casual signals within collections of static images
(Lopez-Paz and Nishihara et al., 2016). In this work, we use the method to decide whether
the BCE is the cause of the downward trend.
First, per business knowledge and sense, we start from a small customer sample who are
in downward score decile 7-10 and had a BCE on their last purchase day; we assume that
they are real sufferers.
Second, we try to demonstrate causality. Let X be the cumulative BCE count in the past;
Y be the model decile (higher decile, higher likelihood to be downward). We do causal
inference separately corresponding to the customer type, as the transactional behaviors of FB
8
and IB are quite different. It is expected to observe asymmetry where X can cause Y but Y
cannot cause X.
Table 6. Casual Inference
Frequent Buyer
Relationship
𝑌 ← 𝑓(𝑋) + 𝑒
𝑋 ← 𝑔(𝑌) + 𝑒
Coefficient
0.008
0.53
With CL 𝛂 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏
Pass
Fail
Infrequent Buyer
Relationship
𝑌 ← 𝑓(𝑋) + 𝑒
𝑋 ← 𝑔(𝑌) + 𝑒
Coefficient
0.03
0.007
With CL 𝛂 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏
Pass
Fail
We list the linear regression results in the Table 6. It indicates that the asymmetry exists
and the initial sample can be considered as Golden Set. For FB, with the confidence level 0.001,
the casual inference suggests that the BCE is the cause of the downward trend; but the BCE
reports is not the consequence of the downward trend. Similar conclusion can be induced for
IB.
2.3.2 Semi-supervised Learning and Look-like Model
We conclude that the customers in the Golden Set are the ones who suffered from BCE
by causal inference. However, there must be additional customers who suffered from BCE but
they did not report the issue. We here name them as silent sufferers. In this section, semisupervised learning theory is applied to find the silent sufferers. In some of the cases, labeled
data is not enough to build a supervised learning model and handling the situation semisupervised learning is a potential solution (Zhu, 2005). For our case, we have a limited golden
set; the rest are unknown labeled customers. An expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm is
used in this work (Liu and Lee et al., 2002).
The label of the Golden Set in a supervised learning fashion can be positive (i.e. 1).
However, for the remainder of the users, we do not know their labels. Some of them are silent
sufferers who should be also labeled as 1, while others are “normal” users and their labels
should be 0. In order to label these unknown customers, semi-supervised learning technique
is used in this section to solve the problem.
9
Fig 4. Initialize the Semi-supervised Learning
Algorithm 1
Initialize parameters. Set label 𝑦𝑖 of golden set 𝐺 = {(𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )} as 1; mixed data set 𝑀 =
{(𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )} as 0.
Set the stop criteria 𝜃. Set the change rate 𝛽 = 1. Set the maximum iteration 𝑁.
While 𝛽 > 𝜃 and 𝑘 < 𝑁
1 Randomly picking a subset 𝐺′ ⊂ 𝐺 set as spies.
2 Build binary classifier 𝑓𝑘 (𝑥) on the dataset 𝑀′ = 𝐺′ ∪ 𝑀.
3 Scoring the combined dataset 𝑀′ and update the labels on 𝑀′ .
4 Send the spies back to golden set and re-labeled them as 1.
5 𝑀 = 𝑀′\𝐺′
6 Compute the label change rate 𝛽 on 𝑀.
7 𝑘 = 𝑘 + 1
Figure 4 illustrates the one iteration step of the learning procedure. In step 1, the Golden
Set and the remainder of the unknown dataset are mixed without labels. We then set the
initial labels of the unlabeled customers as all 0s. In step 2, we randomly select part of the
positive samples as spies and combine with the mixed part. It is now feasible to train a
supervised learning model to get a binary classifier, although it is biased due to the unknown
labels of the mixed dataset. In step 3, send all the spies back to the Golden Set. For the
remaining mixed part, use the binary classifiers to re-label all the samples utilizing a specified
cut-off. Notice that after re-labeling, some of the samples change their labels. The overall
label change rate can be referred as stop criteria. When the change rate is lower than the
threshold, stop the iteration procedure. The detailed algorithm is organized in the
To build the binary classifier in step 3, the variables are from the following aspects: BCE
reports, customer service (call, online chat, email), help & FAQ page behaviors, buyer’s
feedback to sellers, survey data, and behavioral features. The cut-off is selected by the max
10
𝐹1 scores in Step 3. F-score is used to trade off the precision and recall. It is possible to
choose other cut-off such as 𝐹0.5 , 𝐹2 to fit with a different application (Li and Wang et al.,
2008).
2.3.3 Evaluation
It is difficult to tell the model performance on the mixed dataset since the true labels are
all unknown. Nonetheless, the performance on the Golden Set still can be observed as a
reasonable reference. In an ideal case, the model should classify all customers in the golden
set as positive cases. We divide the golden set into two parts: one part is combined with the
mixed set as a training set; the other is a holdout validation set. We check the accuracy on
the hold out validation set via the binary classifier built in each iteration. We consider the
accuracy as recall since it is similar to the original meaning of the concept. It is expected that
the recall improves along with iteration. In addition, the label change rate on the mixed
dataset should be stable after a sufficient number of iterations.
(b) Recall of Validation Set on Max F1 of each iterative
(a) Label change rate of the unknown dataset
model
Fig 6. Iteration Procedure of Trust Lever
Figure 6 shows the iteration of the algorithm. As the recall tends to be stable and the
label change rate is near to zero, we can conclude that iteration 11 is an ideal choice as the
final model. In Table 7, we list the top five variables of the selected binary classifier.
Table 7. Top five variables in the Trust Lever Semi-supervised Learning Model
Variable Name
Variable Type
# of days since last defect
Defect rate of pre 7 days(without late delivery)
Defect rate of pre 1 year(without late delivery)
BCE count of pre 1 year
BCE
BCE
BCE
BCE
11
# of days since last purchase
Transaction
3. Model Performance
In this section, we set up test to verify the correctness of the population selected by our
framework and influence of the model in real business case. As the model targets the
downward users caused by BCE, it is reasonable to reach them with an apology message
about the customer experience. We launched an A/B campaign test in US and UK in Sep.
2017. Using the labels from model prediction, we chose 1,012 customers who were in the
Golden Set or Silent Sufferers set. Next, we randomly separated those into test and control
groups. For the test group, we sent each one an email to apologize. Details of the population
can be found in Table 8.
Table 8. Settings of the Campaign
Control
Test
Grand Total
# Golden Set
143
572
715
# Silent Suffers
55
242
297
Grand Total
198
814
1,012
After the campaign run date, the lift of GMV in the test group is 88.5% comparing with
the control group. Through a two-sample t-test, which is used to determine if the means of
two groups are equal (Jones, 1994), it suggests that the improvement of the test group
comparing with the control group is significant with the confidence level α = 0.05. The
decent lift indicates that we targeted the right population and got their positive feedback.
4. Discussion
In this work, we propose a scientific framework to focus on the downward trend
customers in the business, leveraging multiple machine-learning techniques. We first propose
a method to define and detect the propensity of downward trend of customers, which
becomes the foundation for the following step. Next, casual inference and semi-supervised
learning are applied to find golden set and silent sufferers. In an A/B campaign test, we verify
the performance of the model and ensure the effectiveness of the model.
The casual inference and semi-supervised learning part are adapted to other stages of
customer lifecycle as well, including churn, early churn and one-and-only-one-transaction
cases. For lever detection in this study, we build and test the frame on the BCE lever. However,
other levers such as spend capacity are also worth efforts. Moreover, we introduce the
methodology in an e-commerce business background. It is effortless to apply in other
business areas. For instance, in the telecommunication industry, we can use the variables such
as call quality, device type, and count of the text message sent among others to develop the
12
framework. We will focus on improving performance and extend to other CRM application
scenarios.
13
References:
Almana, A. M. and M. S. Aksoy, et al. (2014). "A survey on data mining techniques in customer churn
analysis for telecom industry." Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 4 (5): 165-171.
Burez, J. and D. Van den Poel (2009). "Handling class imbalance in customer churn prediction." Expert
Systems with Applications 36 (3): 4626-4636.
Chen, I. J. and K. Popovich (2003). "Understanding customer relationship management (CRM) People,
process and technology." Business process management journal 9 (5): 672-688.
Coussement, K. and D. Van den Poel (2008). "Churn prediction in subscription services: An application
of support vector machines while comparing two parameter-selection techniques." Expert systems with
applications 34 (1): 313-327.
Friedman, J. H. (2001). "Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine." Annals of
statistics: 1189-1232.
Kamalraj, N. and A. Malathi (2013). "A survey on churn prediction techniques in communication sector."
International Journal of Computer Applications 64 (5).
Lee, E. and E. Lee, et al. (2017). "Predicting customer churn in mobile industry using data mining
technology." Industrial Management & Data Systems 117 (1): 90-109.
Li, X. and Y. Wang, et al. (2008). Learning query intent from regularized click graphs. Proceedings of
the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information
retrieval, ACM.
Liu, B. and W. S. Lee, et al. (2002). Partially supervised classification of text documents. ICML.
Lopez-Paz, D. and R. Nishihara, et al. (2016). "Discovering causal signals in images." arXiv preprint
arXiv:1605.08179.
Natekin, A. and A. Knoll (2013). "Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial." Frontiers in neurorobotics 7.
Óskarsdóttir, M. and C. Bravo, et al. (2017). "Social network analytics for churn prediction in telco:
Model building, evaluation and network architecture." Expert Systems with Applications 85: 204-220.
Shaughnessy, J. J. and E. B. Zechmeister (1985). Research methods in psychology., Alfred A. Knopf.
Subramanya, K. B. and A. Somani (2017). Enhanced feature mining and classifier models to predict
customer churn for an E-retailer. Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering-Confluence, 2017 7th
International Conference on, IEEE.
Wei, C. and I. Chiu (2002). "Turning telecommunications call details to churn prediction: a data mining
approach." Expert Systems with Applications 23 (2): 103-112.
Xie, Y. and X. Li, et al. (2009). "Customer churn prediction using improved balanced random forests."
Expert Systems with Applications 36 (3): 5445-5449.
Yuan, S. and S. Bai, et al. (2017). Customer Churn Prediction in the Online New Media Platform: A
Case Study on Juzi Entertainment. Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon), 2017 International
Conference on, IEEE.
Zhu, X. (2005). "Semi-supervised learning literature survey.".
14
| 2cs.AI
|
Spatially Controlled Relay Beamforming:
2-Stage Optimal Policies
arXiv:1705.07463v1 [math.OC] 21 May 2017
Dionysios S. Kalogerias and Athina P. Petropulu
May 2017
Abstract
The problem of enhancing Quality-of-Service (QoS) in power constrained, mobile relay beamforming networks, by optimally and dynamically controlling the motion of the relaying nodes, is
considered, in a dynamic channel environment. We assume a time slotted system, where the relays update their positions before the beginning of each time slot. Modeling the wireless channel
as a Gaussian spatiotemporal stochastic field, we propose a novel 2-stage stochastic programming
problem formulation for optimally specifying the positions of the relays at each time slot, such
that the expected QoS of the network is maximized, based on causal Channel State Information
(CSI) and under a total relay transmit power budget. This results in a schema where, at each
time slot, the relays, apart from optimally beamforming to the destination, also optimally, predictively decide their positions at the next time slot, based on causally accumulated experience.
Exploiting either the Method of Statistical Differentials, or the multidimensional Gauss-Hermite
Quadrature Rule, the stochastic program considered is shown to be approximately equivalent to
a set of simple subproblems, which are solved in a distributed fashion, one at each relay. Optimality and performance of the proposed spatially controlled system are also effectively assessed,
under a rigorous technical framework; strict optimality is rigorously demonstrated via the development of a version of the Fundamental Lemma of Stochastic Control, and, performance-wise,
it is shown that, quite interestingly, the optimal average network QoS exhibits an increasing
trend across time slots, despite our myopic problem formulation. Numerical simulations are
presented, experimentally corroborating the success of the proposed approach and the validity
of our theoretical predictions.
Keywords. Spatially Controlled Relay Beamforming, Mobile Relay Beamforming, Network
Mobility Control, Network Utility Optimization, QoS Maximization, Motion Control, Distributed
Cooperative Networks, Stochastic Programming.
The Authors are with the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of
New Jersey, 94 Brett Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. e-mail: {d.kalogerias, athinap}@rutgers.edu.
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grants CCF-1526908 & CNS-1239188.
Also, this work constitutes an extended preprint of a two part paper (soon to be) submitted for publication to
the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing in Spring/Summer 2017.
1
Contents
1 Introduction
2
2 System Model
6
3 Spatiotemporal Wireless Channel Modeling
3.1 Large Scale Gaussian Channel Modeling in the dB Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Model Justification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 Extensions & Some Technical Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
8
10
11
4 Spatially Controlled Relay Beamforming
15
4.1 Joint Scheduling of Communications & Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.2 2-Stage Stochastic Optimization of Beamforming Weights and Relay Positions: Base
Formulation & Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.3 SINR Maximization at the Destination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.3.1 Approximation by the Method of Statistical Differentials . . . . . . . . . . . 23
4.3.2 Brute Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.4 Theoretical Guarantees: Network QoS Increases Across Time Slots . . . . . . . . . . 28
5 Numerical Simulations & Experimental Validation
33
6 Conclusions
36
7 Acknowledgments
36
8 Appendices
8.1 Appendix A: Proofs / Section 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.1.1 Proof of Lemma 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.1.2 Proof of Theorem 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.2 Appendix B: Measurability & The Fundamental Lemma of Stochastic Control . .
8.2.1 Random Functions & The Substitution Rule for Conditional Expectations
8.2.2 A Base Form of the Lemma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.2.3 Guaranteeing the Existence of Measurable Optimal Controls . . . . . . .
8.2.4 Fusion & Derivation of Conditions C1-C6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.3 Appendix C: Proofs / Section 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.3.1 Proof of Theorem 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.3.2 Proof of Lemma 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.3.3 Proof of Theorem 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.3.4 Proof of Theorem 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
37
37
37
38
39
40
45
53
55
56
56
62
63
63
Introduction
Distributed, networked communication systems, such as relay beamforming networks [1–7] (e.g.,
Amplify & Forward (AF)) are typically designed without explicitly considering how the positions of
the networking nodes might affect the quality of the communication. Optimum physical placement
of assisting networking nodes, which could potentially improve the quality of the communication,
2
does not constitute a clear network design aspect. However, in most practical settings in physical
layer communications, the Channel State Information (CSI) observed by each networking node,
per channel use, although (modeled as) random, it is both spatially and temporally correlated.
It is, therefore, reasonable to ask if and how system performance could be improved by controlling the positions of certain network nodes, based on causal side information, and exploiting the
spatiotemporal dependencies of the wireless medium.
Recently, autonomous node mobility has been proposed as an effective means to further enhance
performance in various distributed network settings. In [8], optimal transmit AF beamforming has
been combined with potential field based relay mobility control in multiuser cooperative networks, in
order to minimize relay transmit power, while meeting certain Quality-of-Service (QoS) constraints.
In [9], in the framework of information theoretic physical layer security, decentralized jammer motion
control has been jointly combined with noise nulling and cooperative jamming, maximizing the
network secrecy rate. In [10], optimal relay positioning has been studied in systems where multiple
relays deliver information to a destination, in the presence of an eavesdropper, with a goal of
maximizing or achieving a target level of ergodic secrecy.
In the complementary context of communication aware (comm-aware) robotics, node mobility
has been exploited in distributed robotic networks, in order to enhance system performance, in terms
of maintaining reliable, in-network communication connectivity [11–14], and optimizing network
energy management [15]. Networked node motion control has also been exploited in special purpose
applications, such as networked robotic surveillance [16] and target tracking [17].
In [8–10], the links among the nodes of the network (or the related statistics) are assumed to
be available in the form of static channel maps, during the whole motion of the jammers/relays.
However, this is an oversimplifying assumption in scenarios where the channels change significantly
in time and space [18–20].
In this paper, we try to overcome this major limitation, and we consider the problem of optimally
and dynamically updating relay positions in one source/destination relay beamforming networks,
in a dynamic channel environment. Different from [8–10], we model the wireless channel as a
spatiotemporal stochastic field ; this approach may be seen as a versatile extension of a realistic,
commonly employed “log-normal” channel model [20]. We then propose a 2-stage stochastic programming problem formulation, optimally specifying the positions of the relays at each time slot,
such that the Signal-to-Interference+Noise Ratio (SINR) or QoS at the destination, at the same
time slot, is maximized on average, based on causal CSI, and subject to a total power constraint at
the relays. At each time slot, the relays not only beamform to the destination, but also optimally,
predictively decide their positions at the next time slot, based on their experience (causal actions
and channel observations). This novel, cyber-physical system approach to relay beamforming is
termed as Spatially Controlled Relay Beamforming.
Exploiting the assumed stochastic channel structure, it is first shown that the proposed optimal
motion control problem is equivalent to a set of simpler, two dimensional subproblems, which can
be solved in a distributed fashion, one at each relay, without the need for intermediate exchange of
messages among the relays. However, each of the objectives of the aforementioned subproblems
involves the evaluation of a conditional expectation of a well defined ratio of almost surely positive
random variables, which is impossible to perform analytically, calling for the development of easily
implementable approximations to each of the original problems. Two such heuristics are considered.
The first is based on the so-called Method of Statistical Differentials [21], whereas the second constitutes a brute force approach, based on the multidimensional Gauss-Hermite Quadrature Rule, a
readily available routine for numerical integration. In both cases, the original problem objective is
3
replaced by the respective approximation, which, in both cases, is shown to be easily computed via
simple, closed form expressions. The computational complexity of both approaches is also discussed
and characterized. Subsequently, we present an important result, along with the respective detailed
technical development, characterizing the performance of the proposed system, across time slots
(Theorems 6 and 7). In a nutshell, this result states that, although our problem objective is itself
myopic at each time slot, the expected network QoS exhibits an increasing trend across time slots
(in other words, the expected QoS increases in time, within a small positive slack), under optimal
decision making at the relays. Lastly, we present representative numerical simulations, experimentally confirming both the efficacy and feasibility of the proposed approach, as well as the validity
of our theoretical predictions.
During exposition of the proposed spatially controlled relay beamforming system, we concurrently develop and utilize a rigorous discussion concerning the optimality of our approach, and with
interesting results (Section 8.2 / Appendix B). Clearly, our problem formulation is challenging; it
involves a variational stochastic optimization problem, where, at each time slot, the decision variable, a function of the so far available useful information in the system (also called a policy, or a
decision rule), constitutes itself the spatial coordinates, from which every network relay will observe
the underlying spatiotemporal channel field, at the next time slot. In other words, our formulation
requires solving an (myopic, in particular) optimal spatial field sampling problem, in a dynamic fashion. Such a problem raises certain fundamental questions, not only related to our proposed spatially
controlled beamforming formulation, but also to a large class of variational stochastic programs of
similar structure.
In this respect, our contributions are partially driven by assuming an underlying complete base
probability space of otherwise arbitrary structure, generating all random phenomena considered in
this work. Under this general setting, we explicitly identify sufficient conditions, which guarantee
the validity of the so-called substitution rule for conditional expectations, specialized to such expectations of random spatial (in general) fields/functions with an also random spatial parameter, relative
to some σ-algebra, which makes the latter parameter measurable (fixed) (Definition 6 & Theorem
8). General validity of the substitution rule, without imposing additional, special conditions, traces
back to the existence of regular conditional distributions, defined directly on the sample space of
the underlying base probability space. Such regular conditional distributions cannot be guaranteed
to exist, unless the sample space has nice topological properties, for instance, if it is Polish [22].
In the context of our spatially controlled beamforming application, such structural requirements
on the sample space, which, by assumption, is conceived as a model of “nature”, and generates
the spatiotemporal channel field sampled by the relays, are simply not reasonable. Considering
this, our first contribution is to show that it is possible to guarantee the validity of the form of
the substitution rule under consideration by imposing conditions on the topological structure of the
involved random field, rather than that of the sample space (a part of its domain). This results in
a rather generally applicable problem setting (Theorem 8).
In this work, the validity of the substitution rule is ascertained by imposing simple continuity
assumptions on the random functions involved, which, in some cases, might be considered somewhat
restrictive. Nevertheless, those assumptions can be significantly weakened, guaranteeing the validity
of the substitution rule for vastly discontinuous random functions, including, for instance, cases with
random discontinuities, or random jumps. The development of this extended analysis, though, is
out of the scope of this paper, and will be presented elsewhere.
The validity of the substitution rule is vitally important in the treatment of a wide class of variational stochastic programs, including that involved in the proposed spatially controlled beamforming
4
approach. In particular, leveraging the power of the substitution rule, we develop a version of the
so-called Fundamental Lemma of Stochastic Control (FLSC) [23–28] (Lemma 3), which provides
sufficient conditions that permit interchange of integration (expectation) and max/minimization
in general variational (stochastic) programming settings. The FLSC allows the initial variational
problem to be exchanged by a related, though pointwise (ordinary) optimization problem, thus
efficiently reducing the search over a class of functions (initial problem) to searching over constants,
which is, of course, a standard and much more handleable optimization setting. In slightly different
ways, the FLSC is evidently utilized in relevant optimality analysis both in Stochastic Programming
[25, 26], and in Dynamic Programming & Stochastic Optimal Control [23, 24, 27, 28].
A very general version of the FLSC is given in ([25], Theorem 14.60), where unconstrained
variational optimization of integrals of extended real-valued random lower semicontinuous functions
[26], or, by another name, normal integrands [25], with respect to a general σ-finite measure, is
considered. Our version of the FLSC may be considered a useful variation of Theorem 14.60 in
[25], and considers constrained variational optimization problems involving integrals of random
functions, but with respect to some base probability measure (that is, expectations). In our result,
via the tower property of expectations, the role of the normal integrand in ([25], Theorem 14.60)
is played by the conditional expectation of the random function considered, relative to a σ-algebra,
which makes the respective decision variable of the problem (a function(al)) measurable. Assuming
a base probability space of arbitrary structure, this argument is justified by assuming validity
of the substitution rule, which, in turn, is ascertained under our previously developed sufficient
conditions. Different from ([25], Theorem 14.60), in our version of the FLSC, apart from natural
Borel measurability requirements, no continuity assumptions are directly imposed on the structure
on either the random function, or the respective conditional expectation. In this respect, our result
extends ([25], Theorem 14.60), and is of independent interest.
On the other hand, from the strongly related perspective of Stochastic Optimal Control, our
version of the FLSC may be considered as the basic building block for further development of Bellman Equation-type, Dynamic Programming solutions [27, 28], under a strictly Borel measurability
framework, sufficient for our purposes. Quite differently though, in our formulation, the respective
cost (at each stage of the problem) is itself a random function (a spatial field), whose domain is
the Cartesian product of a base space of arbitrary topology, with another, nicely behaved Borel
space, instead of the usual Cartesian product of two Borel spaces (the spaces of state and controls),
as in the standard dynamic programming setting [27, 28]. Essentially, our formulation is “one step
back” as compared to the basic dynamic programming model of [27, 28], in the sense that the cost
considered herein refers directly back to the base space. As a result, different treatment of the
problem is required; essentially, the validity of the substitution rule for our cost function bypasses
the requirement for existence of conditional distributions, and exploits potential nice properties of
the respective conditional cost (in our case, joint Borel measurability).
Emphasizing on our particular problem formulation, our functional assumptions, which guarantee the validity of the substitution rule, combined with the FLSC, result in a total of six sufficient
conditions, under which strict optimality via problem exchangeability is guaranteed (conditions
C1-C6 in Lemma 4). Those conditions are subsequently shown to be satisfied specifically for the
spatially controlled beamforming problem under consideration (verification Theorem 3), ensuring
strict optimality of a solution obtained by exploiting problem exchangeability.
Finally, motivated by the need to provide performance guarantees for the proposed myopic
stochastic decision making scheme (our spatially controlled beamforming network), we introduce
the concept of a linear martingale difference generator spatiotemporal field. We then rigorously
5
show that, when such fields are involved in the objective of a myopic stochastic sampling scheme,
stagewise myopic stochastic exploration of the involved field is, under conditions, either monotonic,
or quasi-monotonic (that is, monotonic within some small positive slack), either under optimal
sampling decision making, or when retaining the same policy next. This result is the basis for
providing performance guarantees for the proposed spatially controlled relay beamforming system,
as briefly stated above.
Notation (some and basic): Matrices and vectors will be denoted by boldface uppercase and
boldface lowercase letters, respectively. Calligraphic letters and formal script letters will denote
sets and σ-algebras, respectively. The operators (·)T and (·)H , λmin (·) and λmax (·) will denote
transposition, conjugate transposition, minimum and maximum eigenvalue, respectively. The `p P
1/p
norm of x ∈ Rn is kxkp , ( ni=1 |x (i)|p ) , for all N 3 p ≥ 1. For any N 3 N ≥ 1, SN , SN
+,
SN
++ will denote the sets of symmetric, symmetric positive semidefinite and symmetric positive
definite matrices, respectively. √The finite N -dimensional identity operator will be denoted as IN .
+
Additionally, we define J , −1, N+ , {1, 2, . . .}, N+
n , {1, 2, . . . , n}, Nn , {0} ∪ Nn and
+
+
Nm
n , Nn \ Nm−1 , for positive naturals n > m.
2
System Model
On a compact, square planar region W ⊂ R2 , we consider a wireless cooperative network consisting
of one source, one destination and R ∈ N+ assistive relays, as shown in Fig. 2.1. Each entity
of the network is equipped with a single antenna, being able for both information reception and
broadcasting/transmission. The source and destination are stationary and located at pS ∈ W and
pD ∈ W, respectively, whereas the relays are assumed to be mobile; each relay i ∈ N+
R moves along
a trajectory pi (t) ∈ S ⊂ W − {pS , pD } ⊂ W, where, in general, t ∈ R+ , and where S is compact.
h
iT
We also define the supervector p (t) , pT1 (t) pT2 (t) . . . pTR (t)
∈ S R ⊂ R2R×1 . Additionally,
we assume that the relays can cooperate with each other, either by exchanging local messages, or
by communicating with a local fusion center, through a dedicated channel. Hereafter, as already
stated above, all probabilistic arguments made below presume the existence of a complete base
probability space of otherwise completely arbitrary structure, prespecified by a triplet (Ω, F , P).
This base space models a universal source of randomness, generating all stochastic phenomena in
our considerations.
Assuming that a direct link between the source and the destination does not exist, the role of
the relays is determined to be assistive to the communication, operating in a classical, two phase
AF relaying mode. Fix a T > 0, and divide the time interval [0, T ] into NT time slots, with t ∈ N+
NT
n
o
2
denoting the respective time slot. Let s (t) ∈ C, with E |s (t)|
≡ 1, denote the symbol to be
transmitted at time slot t. Also, assuming a flat fading channel model, as well as channel reciprocity
and quasistaticity in each time slot, let the sets {fi (t) ∈ C}i∈N+ and {gi (t) ∈ C}i∈N+ contain the
R
R
random, spatiotemporally varying source-relay and relay-destination channel gains, respectively.
These are further assumed to be evaluations of the separable random channel fields or maps f (p, t)
and g (p, t), respectively, that is, fi (t) ≡ f (pi (t) , t) and gi (t) ≡ g (pi (t) , t), for all i ∈ N+
R and for
all t ∈ N+
.
Then,
if
P
>
0
denotes
the
transmission
power
of
the
source,
during
AF
phase
1, the
0
NT
signals received at the relays can be expressed as
p
ri(t), P0 fi(t) s(t) + ni(t) ∈ C,
(2.1)
6
Source
pS
f(
f
p
j
) , t)
t
(
pi
(t)
,t
g (p
i
pi (t)
g pj
pj (t)
(t) ,
Destination
t)
t
(t) ,
pD
S⊂W
W ⊂ R2
Figure 2.1: A schematic of the system model considered.
n
o
+
2
for all i ∈ N+
and
for
all
t
∈
N
,
where
n
(t)
∈
C,
with
E
|n
(t)|
≡ σ 2 , constitutes a zero
i
i
R
NT
mean observation noise process at the i-th relay, independent across relays. During AF phase 2, all
relays simultaneously retransmit the information received, each modulating their received signal by
a weight wi (t) ∈ C, i ∈ N+
R . The signal received at the destination can be expressed as
p X
y (t), P0
wi(t) gi(t) ri(t)
+
i∈NR
≡
X
p X
P0
wi(t) gi(t) fi(t) s(t) +
wi(t) gi(t) ni(t) + nD (t) ∈ C,
|
+
i∈NR
{z
signal (transformed)
}
+
i∈NR
|
{z
interference + reception noise
(2.2)
}
n
o
+
2
2
for all i ∈ N+
≡ σD
, constitutes a zero mean,
R and t ∈ NNT , where nD (t) ∈ C, with E |nD (t)|
spatiotemporally white noise process at the destination.
In the following, it is assumed that the channel fields f (p, t) and g (p, t) may be statistically
dependent both spatially and temporally, and that, as usual, the processes s (t), [f (p, t) g (p, t)],
ni (t) for all i ∈ N+
R , and nD (t) are mutually independent. Also, we will assume that, at each time
slot t, CSI {fi (t)}i∈N+ and {gi (t)}i∈N+ is known exactly to all relays. This may be achieved through
R
R
pilot based estimation.
3
Spatiotemporal Wireless Channel Modeling
This section introduces a general stochastic model for describing the spatiotemporal evolution of the
wireless channel. For the benefit of the reader, a more intuitive justification of this general model
is also provided. Additionally, some extensions to the model are briefly discussed, highlighting its
versatility, along with some technical considerations, which will be of importance later, for analyzing
the theoretical consistency of the subsequently proposed techniques.
7
3.1
Large Scale Gaussian Channel Modeling in the dB Domain
At each space-time point (p, t) ∈ S × N+
NT , the source-relay channel field may be decomposed as
the product of three space-time varying components [29], as
f (p, t) ≡ f P L(p) f SH (p, t) f M F (p, t) eJ
| {z } | {z } | {z }
path loss shadowing
2π kp−pS k
2
λ
,
(3.1)
fading
√
where J , −1 denotes the imaginary unit, λ > 0 denotes the wavelength employed for the
communication, and:
−`/2
1. f P L (p) , kp − pS k2
loss exponent.
is the path loss field, a deterministic quantity, with ` > 0 being the path
2. f SH (p, t) ∈ R is the shadowing field, whose square is, for each (p, t) ∈ S × N+
NT , a base-10
log-normal random variable with zero location.
3. f M F (p, t) ∈ C constitutes the multipath fading field, a stationary process with known statistics.
The same decomposition holds in direct correspondence for the relay-destination channel field,
g (p, t). Additionally, if “⊥
⊥” means “is statistically independent of”, it is assumed that [20]
h
i
h
i
f M F (p, t) g M F (p, t) ⊥⊥ f SH (p, t) g SH (p, t)
and
(3.2)
f M F (p, t) ⊥⊥ g M F (p, t) .
(3.3)
In particular, if the phase of f M F (p, t) is denoted as φf (p, t) ∈ [−π, π], is further assumed that
f M F (p, t) ⊥⊥ φf (p, t) ,
(3.4)
and the same for for g M F (p, t). It also follows that
h
i
h
i
f M F (p, t) g M F (p, t) ⊥⊥ f SH (p, t) g SH (p, t) .
(3.5)
We are interested in the magnitudes of both fields f (p, t) and g (p, t). Instead of working with
the multiplicative model described by (3.1), it is much preferable to work in logarithmic scale. We
may define the log-scale magnitude field
F (p, t) , αS (p) ` + σS (p, t) + ξS (p, t) ,
(3.6)
where we define
−αS (p) , 10 log10 (kp − pS k2 ) ,
2
σS (p, t) , 10 log10 f SH (p, t)
2
(3.7)
and
ξS (p, t) , 10 log10 f M F (p, t) − ρ, with
2
ρ , E 10 log10 f M F (p, t)
,
8
(3.8)
(3.9)
(3.10)
for all (p, t) ∈ S ×N+
NT . It is then trivial to show that the magnitude of f (p, t) may be reconstructed
via the bijective formula
log (10)
ρ/20
|f (p, t)| ≡ 10
exp
F (p, t) ,
(3.11)
20
for all (p, t) ∈ S × N+
NT , a “trick” that will prove very useful in the next section. Regarding g (p, t),
the log-scale field G (p, t) is defined in the same fashion, but replacing the subscript “S” by “D”.
For each relay i ∈ N+
R , let us define the respective log-scale channel magnitude processes Fi (t) ,
F (pi (t) , t) and Gi (t) , G (pi (t) , t), for all t ∈ N+
NT . Of course, we may stack all the Fi (t)’s
defined in (3.6), resulting in the vector additive model
F (t) , αS (p (t)) ` + σ S (t) + ξ S (t) ∈ RR×1 ,
(3.12)
where αS (t), σ S (t) and ξ S (t) are defined accordingly. We can also define G (t) , αD (p (t)) ` +
σ D (t) + ξ D (t) ∈ RR×1 , with each quantity in direct correspondence with (3.12). We may also
i
define, in the same manner, the log-scale shadowing and multipath fading processes σS(D)
(t) ,
i
+
σS(D) (pi (t) , t) and ξS(D) (t) , ξS(D) (pi (t) , t), for all t ∈ NNT , respectively.
Next, let us focus on the spatiotemporal dynamics of {|fi (t)|}i and {|gi (t)|}i , which are modeled
through those of the shadowing components of {Fi (t)}i and {Gi (t)}i . It is assumed that, for any
NT and any deterministic ensemble of positions of the relays in N+
NT , say {p (t)}t∈N+ , the random
vector
NT
h
iT
F T (1) GT (1) . . . F T (NT ) GT (NT ) ∈ R2RNT ×1
(3.13)
is jointly Gaussian with known means
and
known covariance matrix.
More specifically, on a per
i.i.d.
i.d.
2
i
2
+
i
node basis, we let ξS(D) (t) ∼ N 0, σξ and σS(D) (t) ∼ N 0, η , for all t ∈ N+
NT and i ∈ NR
[20, 30]. In particular, extending Gudmundson’s model [31] in a straightforward way, we propose
defining the spatiotemporal correlations of the shadowing part of the channel as
!
n
o
pi (k) − pj (l) 2 |k − l|
i
j
2
E σS (k) σS (l) , η exp −
−
,
(3.14)
β
γ
and correspondingly for
n
o
i
σD
(t)
+
i∈NR
, and additionally,
n
o
n
o
kpS − pD k2
i
j
i
j
E σS (k) σD (l) , E σS (k) σS (l) exp −
,
δ
(3.15)
+
+
+
2
for all (i, j) ∈ N+
R × NR and for all (k, l) ∈ NNT × NNT . In the above, η > 0 and β > 0 are called
the shadowing power and the correlation distance, respectively [31]. In this fashion, we will call
γ > 0 and δ > 0 the correlation time and the BS (Base Station) correlation, respectively. For later
reference, let us define the (cross)covariance matrices
n
o
ΣSD (k, l) , E σ S (k) σ TD (l) + 1{S≡D} 1{k≡l} σξ2 IR ∈ SR ,
(3.16)
as well as
Σ (k, l) ,
ΣSS (k, l) ΣSD (k, l)
∈ S2R ,
ΣSD (k, l) ΣDD (k, l)
9
(3.17)
Source
f(
t)
,
)
t
pi(
pS
cl
a
t
bs
O
l
e
ca
i
s
y Destination
Ph
pi (t)
g pj
pj (t)
t
(t) ,
pD
W ⊂ R2
Figure 3.1: A case where source-relay and relay-destination links are likely to be correlated.
+
for all (k, l) ∈ N+
NT × NNT . Using these definitions, the covariance matrix of the joint distribution
describing (3.13) can be readily expressed as
Σ (1, 1)
Σ (1, 2) . . . Σ (1, NT )
Σ (2, 1)
Σ (2, 2) . . . Σ (2, NT )
2RNT
Σ,
.
(3.18)
∈S
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
Σ (NT , 1) Σ (NT , 2) · · · Σ (NT , NT )
Of course, in order for Σ to be a valid covariance matrix, it must be at least positive semidefinite,
2RN
that is, in S+ T . If fact, for nearly all cases of interest, Σ is guaranteed to be strictly positive
2RN
definite (or in S++ T ), as the following result suggests.
Lemma 1. (Positive (Semi)Definiteness of Σ) For all possible deterministic trajectories of the
2RNT
2RNT
2
relays on S R × N+
. In
NT , it is true that Σ ∈ S++ , as long as σξ 6= 0. Otherwise, Σ ∈ S+
other words, as long as multipath (small-scale) fading is present in the channel response, the joint
Gaussian distribution of the channel vector in (3.13) is guaranteed to be nonsingular.
Proof of Lemma 1. See Appendix A.
3.2
Model Justification
As already mentioned, the spatial dependence among the source-relay and relay-destination channel
magnitudes (due to shadowing) is described via Gudmundson’s model [31] (position related component in (3.14)), which has been very popular in the literature and also experimentally verified
10
[20, 31, 32]. Second, the Laplacian type of temporal dependence among the same groups of channel
magnitudes also constitutes a reasonable choice, in the sense that channel magnitudes are expected
to be significantly correlated only for small time lags, whereas, for larger time lags, such dependence
should decay at a fast rate. For an experimental justification of the adopted model, see, for instance,
[33, 34]. Also note that, this exponential temporal correlation model may result as a reformulation
of Gudmundson’s model, as well. Of course, one could use any other positive (semi)definite kernel,
multiplying the spatial correlation exponential kernel, without changing the statement and proof of
Lemma 1. Third, the incorporation of the spherical/isotropic BS correlation term in our proposed
general model (in (3.15)) can be justified by the the existence of important cases where the source
and destination might be close to each other and yet no direct link may exist between them. See,
for instance, Fig. (3.1), where a “large” physical obstacle makes the direct communication between
the source and the destination impossible. Then, relay beamforming can be exploited in order to
enable efficient communication between the source and the destination, making intelligent use of
the available resources, in order to improve or maintain a certain QoS in the network. In such cases,
however, it is very likely that the shadowing parts of the source-relay and relay-destination links will
be spatially and/or temporally correlated among each other, since shadowing is very much affected
by the spatial characteristics of the terrain, which, in such cases, is common for both beamforming
phases. Of course, by taking the BS station correlation δ → 0, one recovers the generic/trivial case
where the source-relay and relay-destination links are mutually independent.
3.3
Extensions & Some Technical Considerations
It should be also mentioned that our general description of the wireless channel as a spatiotemporal
Gaussian field, does not limit the covariance matrix Σ to be formed as in (3.18); other choices for
Σ will work fine in our subsequent developments, as long as, for each fixed t ∈ N+
NT , some mild
conditions on the spatial interactions of the fields σS(D) (p, t) and ξS(D) (p, t), are satisfied. In what
follows, we consider only the source-relay fields σS (p, t) and ξS (p, t). The same arguments hold
for the relay-destination fields σD (p, t) and ξD (p, t), in direct correspondence.
Fix t ∈ N+
NT . Recall that, so far, we have defined the statistical behavior of both σS (p, t) and
ξS (p, t) only on a per-node basis. However, since the spatiotemporal statistical model introduced
in Section 3.1 is assumed to be valid for any possible trajectory of the relays in S R × N+
NT , each
relay is allowed to be anywhere in S, at each time slot t. This statistical construction induces the
statistical structure (the laws) of both fields σS (p, t) and ξS (p, t) on S.
As far as σS (p, t) is concerned, it is straightforward to see that it constitutes a Gaussian process
with zero mean, and a continuous and isotropic covariance kernel Σσ : R2 → R, defined as
kτ k2
2
Σσ (τ ) , η exp −
,
(3.19)
β
where τ , p − q ≥ 0, for all (p, q) ∈ S 2 , which agrees with the model introduced in (3.14), for
k ≡ l (Gudmundson’s model). Thus, σS (p, t) is a well defined random field.
However, this is not the case with ξS (p, t). Under no additional restrictions, ξS (p, t) and ξS (q, t)
are implicitly assumed to be independent for all (p, q) ∈ S 2 , such that p 6= q. Thus, we are led to
consider ξS (p, t) as a zero-mean white process in continuous space. However, it is well known that
such a process is technically problematic in a measure theoretic framework. Nevertheless, we may
observe that it is not actually essential to characterize the covariance structure of ξS (p, t) for all
(p, q) ∈ S 2 , with p 6= q. This is due to the fact that, at each time slot t ∈ N+
NT , it is physically
11
impossible for any two relays to be arbitrarily close to each other. We may thus make the following
simple assumption on the positions of the relays, at each time slot t ∈ N+
NT .
Assumption 1. (Relay Separation) There exists an εM F > 0, such that, for all t ∈ N+
NT and
any ensemble of relay positions at time slot t, {pi (t)}i∈N+ , it is true that
R
inf
+
+
(i,j)∈NR ×NR
with i6=j
pi (t) − pj (t)
2
> εM F .
(3.20)
Assumption 1 simply states that, at each t ∈ N+
NT , all relays are at least εM F distance units apart
from each other. If this constraint is satisfied, then, without any loss of generality, we may define
ξS (p, t) as a Gaussian field with zero mean, and with any continuous, isotropic (say) covariance
kernel Σξ : R2 → R, which satisfies
(
σξ2 , if τ ≡ 0
Σξ (τ ) ,
,
(3.21)
0,
if kτ k2 ≥ εM F
and is arbitrarily defined otherwise. A simple example is the spherical, compactly supported kernel
with width εM F , defined as [35]
3 kτ k2 1 kτ k2 3
Σo (τ ) 1 −
+
, if kτ k2 < εM F
.
(3.22)
,
2 εM F
2 εM F
2
σξ
0,
if kτ k2 ≥ εM F
Of course, across (discrete) time slots, ξS (p, t) inherits whiteness without any technical issue.
We should stress that the above assumptions are made for technical reasons and will be transparent in the subsequent analysis, as long as the mild constraint (3.20) is satisfied; from the perspective
of the relays, all evaluations of ξS (p, t), at each time slot, will be independent to each other. And,
of course, εM F may be chosen small enough, such that (3.20) is satisfied virtually always, assuming
that the relays are sufficiently far apart from each other, and/or that, at each time slot t, their new
positions are relatively close to their old positions, at time slot t − 1.
Based on the explicit statistical description of σS (p, t) and ξS (p, t) presented above, we now
additionally demand that both are spatial fields with (everywhere) continuous sample paths. Equivalently, we demand that, for every ω ∈ Ω, σS (ω, p, t) ∈ C (S) and ξS (ω, p, t) ∈ C (S) , where C (A)
denotes the set of continuous functions on some qualifying set A. Sample path continuity of stationary Gaussian fields may be guaranteed under mild conditions on the respective lag-dependent
covariance kernel, as the following result suggests, however in a, slightly weaker, almost everywhere
sense.
Theorem 1. (a.e.-Continuity of Gaussian Fields [36–38]) Let X (s), s ∈ RN , be a real-valued,
zero-mean, stationary Gaussian random field with a continuous covariance kernel ΣX : RN → R.
Suppose that there exist constants 0 < c < +∞ and ε, ζ > 0, such that
1−
for all τ ∈
n
ΣX (τ )
c
≤
,
ΣX (0)
|log (kτ k2 )|1+ε
(3.23)
o
x ∈ RN kxk2 < ζ . Then, X (s) is P-almost everywhere sample path continuous, or,
equivalently, P − a.e.-continuous, on every compact subset K ⊂ RN and, therefore, on RN itself.
Additionally, X (s) is bounded, P-almost everywhere, as well.
12
Utilizing Theorem 1 and generically assuming that Σξ , Σo , it is possible to show that both
fields σS (p, t) and ξS (p, t) satisfy the respective conditions and thus, that both fields are a.e.continuous on S. For σS (p, t), the reader is referred to ([37], Example 2.2). Of course, instead of
Σσ , any other kernel may be considered, as long as the condition Theorem 1 is satisfied.
As far as ξS (p, t) is concerned, let us choose ε ≡ 1 and ζ ≡ 1 . We thus need to show that, for
every τ , kτ k2 ∈ [0, 1), it holds that
1−
Σo (τ )
c
,
≤
Σo (0)
(log (kτ k2 ))2
or, equivalently,
1−
3 τ
1
1−
+
2 εM F
2
τ
εM F
3 !
(3.24)
1{τ <εM F } ≤
c
(log (τ ))2
,
(3.25)
for some finite, positive constant c. We first consider the case where 1 > τ ≥ εM F > 0 (whenever
εM F < 1, of course). We then have
1≤
(log (εM F ))2
2
(log (τ ))
,
c1
(log (τ ))2
,
(3.26)
easily verifying the condition required by Theorem 1. Now, when 0 ≤ τ < min {εM F , 1}, it is easy
to see that there exists a finite c2 > 0, such that
c2
τ≤
(log (τ ))2
.
(3.27)
If τ ≡ 0, then the inequality above holds for any choice of c2 . If τ > 0, define a function h : (0, 1) →
R+ , as
h (τ ) , τ (log (τ ))2 .
(3.28)
By a simple first derivative test, it follows that
h (τ ) ≤ max h (τ )
τ ∈(0,1)
≡ h (exp (−2))
≡ 4 exp (−2) ,
∀τ ∈ (0, 1) .
(3.29)
Consequently, (3.27) is (loosely) satisfied for all τ ∈ [0, min {εM F , 1}) ⊆ (0, 1), by choosing c2 ≡
4 exp (−2). Now, observe that
3 τ
1
−
2 εM F
2
τ
εM F
3
<
3 τ
3c2
≤
.
2 εM F
2εM F (log (τ ))2
(3.30)
Finally, simply choose
3c2
c ≡ max c1 ,
2εM F
2 6 exp (−2)
≡ max (log (εM F )) ,
< +∞,
εM F
13
(3.31)
which immediately implies (3.25). Therefore, we have shown that, if we choose Σξ ≡ Σo , then, for
any fixed, but arbitrarily small εM F > 0, the spatial field ξS (p, t) will also be almost everywhere
sample path continuous.
Observe that, via the analysis above, sample path continuity of the involved fields can be ascertained, but only in the only almost everywhere sense. Nevertheless, it easy to show that there always
exist everywhere sample path continuous fields σ
eS (p, t) and ξeS (p, t), which are indistinguishable
from σS (p, t) and ξS (p, t), respectively [39]. Therefore, there is absolutely no loss of generality if
we take both σS (p, t) and ξS (p, t) to be sample path continuous, everywhere in Ω, and we will do
so, hereafter.
Sample path continuity of all fields σS(D) (p, t) and ξS(D) (p, t) will be essential in Section 4,
where we rigorously discuss optimality of the proposed relay motion control framework, with special
focus on the relay beamforming problem.
We close this section by discussing, in some more detail, the temporal properties of the evaluations of the fields σS (p, t) and σD (p, t) at any deterministic set of N (say) positions {pi ∈ S}i∈N+ ,
N
same across all NT time slots. This results in the zero-mean, stationary temporal Gaussian process
h
iT
C (t) , {σS (pi , t)}i∈N+ {σD (pi , t)}i∈N+
∈ R2N ×1 , t ∈ N+
(3.32)
NT ,
N
N
with matrix covariance kernel ΣC : Z → S2N
+ , defined, under the specific spatiotemporal model
considered, as
|ν| e
ΣC (ν) , exp −
ΣC ∈ S2N
(3.33)
+ ,
γ
+
where ν , t − s, for all (t, s) ∈ N+
NT × NNT ,
1 κ
b C ∈ S2N
e
4Σ
ΣC ,
+ ,
κ 1
kpS − pD k2
κ , exp −
< 1,
δ
b C (i, j) , Σσ pi − pj , ∀ (i, j) ∈ N+ × N+ ,
Σ
N
N
(3.34)
(3.35)
(3.36)
and with “4” denoting the operator of the Kronecker product. Then, the following result is true.
Theorem 2. (C (t) is Markov) For any deterministic, time invariant set of points {pi ∈ S}i∈N+ ,
N
the vector process C (t) ∈ R2N ×1 , t ∈ N+
NT , as defined in (3.32)-(3.36), may be represented as a
stable order-1 vector autoregression, satisfying the linear stochastic difference equation
X (t) ≡ ϕX (t − 1) + W (t) ,
t ∈ N+
NT ,
(3.37)
where
ϕ , exp (−1/γ) < 1,
eC
X (0) ∼ N 0, Σ
and
i.i.d.
eC ,
W (t) ∼ N 0, 1 − ϕ2 Σ
In particular, C (t) is Markov.
14
(3.38)
(3.39)
∀t ∈ N+
NT .
(3.40)
Proof of Theorem 2. The proof is a standard exercise in time series; see Appendix A.
From a practical point of view, Theorem 2 is extremely valuable. Specifically, the Markovian
representation of C (t) may be employed in order to efficiently simulate the spatiotemporal paths
of the communication channel on any finite, but arbitrarily fine grid. This is important, since it
allows detailed numerical evaluation of all methods developed in this work. Theorem 2 also reveals
that the channel model we have considered actually agrees with experimental results presented in,
for instance, [33, 34], which show that autoregressive processes constitute an adequate model for
stochastically describing temporal correlations among wireless communication links.
Remark 1. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, the channel process along a specific relay
trajectory, presented in Section 3.1, where the positions of the relays are allowed to vary across time
slots is no longer stationary and may not be shown to satisfy the Markov Property. Therefore, in
our analysis presented hereafter, we regard the aforementioned process as a general, nonstationary
Gaussian process. All inference results presented below are based on this generic representation.
Remark 2. For simplicity, all motion control problems in this paper are formulated on the plane
(some subset of R2 ). This means that any motion of the relays of the network along the third
dimension of the space is indifferent to our channel model. Nevertheless, under appropriate (based
on the requirements discussed above) assumptions concerning 3D wireless channel modeling, all
subsequent arguments would hold in exactly the same fashion when fully unconstrained motion in
R3 is assumed to affect the quality of the wireless channel.
4
Spatially Controlled Relay Beamforming
In this section, we formulate and solve the spatially controlled relay beamforming problem, advocated in this paper. The beamforming objective adopted will be maximization of the Signal-toInterference+Noise Ratio (SINR) at the destination (measuring network QoS), under a total power
budget at the relays. For the single-source single-destination setting considered herein, the aforementioned beamforming problem admits a closed form solution, a fact which will be important in
deriving optimal relay motion control policies, in a tractable fashion. But first, let us present the
general scheduling schema of the proposed mobile beamforming system, as well as some technical
preliminaries on stochastic programming and optimal control, which will be used repeatedly in the
analysis to follow.
4.1
Joint Scheduling of Communications & Controls
At each time slot t ∈ N+
NT and assuming the same carrier for all communication tasks, we employ
a basic joint communication/decision making TDMA-like protocol, as follows:
1. The source broadcasts a pilot signal to the relays, which then estimate their respective channels
relative to the source.
2. The same procedure is carried out for the channels relative to the destination.
3. Then, based on the estimated CSI, the relays beamform in AF mode (assume perfect CSI estimation).
15
Relay
Motion
Channel
Estimation ...
...
∆τt−1
t−1
t
Beamforming
Figure 4.1: Proposed TDMA-like joint scheduling protocol for communications and controls.
4. Based on the CSI received so far, strategic decision making is implemented, motion controllers
of the relays are determined and relays are steered to their updated positions.
The above sequence of actions is repeated for all NT time slots, corresponding to the total operational
horizon of the system. This simple scheduling protocol is graphically depicted in Fig. 4.1.
Concerning relay kinematics, it is assumed that the relays obey the differential equation
ṗ (τ ) ≡ u (τ ) ,
∀τ ∈ [0, T ] ,
(4.1)
where u , [u1 . . . uR ]T ∈ S R , with ui : [0, T ] → S being the motion controller of relay i ∈ N+
R.
Apparently, relay motion is in continuous time. However, assuming the relays may move only after
their controls have been determined and up to the start of the next time slot, we can write
Z
p (t) ≡ p (t − 1) +
ut−1 (τ ) dτ, ∀t ∈ N2NT ,
(4.2)
∆τt−1
with p (1) ≡ pinit , and where ∆τt ⊂ R and ut : ∆τt → S R denote the time interval that the relays
+
are allowed
P to move in and the respective relay controller, in each time slot t ∈ NNT −1 . It holds that
u (τ ) ≡ t∈N+
ut (τ ) 1∆τt (τ ), where τ belongs in the first NT − 1 time slots.Of course, at each
NT −1
time slot t, the length of ∆τt , |∆τt |, must be sufficiently small such that the temporal correlations
of the CSI at adjacent time slots are sufficiently strong. These correlations are controlled by the
correlation time parameter γ, which can be a function of the slot width. Therefore, the velocity of
the relays must be of the order of (|∆τt |)−1 . In this work, though, we assume that the relays are
not explicitly resource constrained, in terms of their motion.
Now, regarding the form of the relay motion controllers ut−1 (τ ) , τ ∈ ∆τt−1 , given a goal position
vector at time slot t, po (t) , it suffices to fix a path in S R , such that the points po (t) and p (t − 1) are
16
connected in at most time |∆τt−1 |. A generic choice for such a path is the straight line1 connecting
poi (t) and pi (t − 1), for all i ∈ N+
R . Therefore, we may choose the relay controllers at time slot
+
t − 1 ∈ NNT −1 as
1
uot−1 (τ ) ,
(po (t) − p (t − 1)) , ∀τ ∈ ∆τt−1 .
(4.3)
∆τt−1
As a result, any motion control problem considered hereafter can now be formulated in terms of
specifying the goal relay positions at the next time slot, given their positions at the current time
slot (and the observed CSI).
In the following, let C (Tt ) denote the set of channel gains observed by the relays, along the paths
of their point trajectories Tt , {p (1) . . . p (t)}, t ∈ N+
NT . Then, Tt may be recursively updated as
+
Tt ≡ Tt−1 ∪ {p (t)}, for all t ∈ NNT , with T0 , ∅. In a technically precise sense, {C (Tt )}t∈N+ will
NT
also denote the filtration generated by the CSI observed at the relays, along Tt , interchangeably. In
other words, in case the trajectories of the relays are themselves random, then C (Tt ) denotes the
σ-algebra generated by both the CSI observed up to and including time slot t and p (1) . . . p (t),
for all t ∈ N+
NT . Additionally, we define C (T0 ) ≡ C ({∅}) as C (T0 ) , {∅, Ω}, that is, as the trivial
σ-algebra, and we may occasionally refer to time t ≡ 0, as a dummy time slot, by convention.
4.2
2-Stage Stochastic Optimization of Beamforming Weights and Relay Positions: Base Formulation & Methodology
At each time slot t ∈ N+
NT , given the current CSI encoded in C (Tt ), we are interested in determining
o
w (t) , [w1 (t) w2 (t) . . . wR (t)]T , as an optimal solution to a beamforming optimization problem,
as a functional of C (Tt ). Let the optimal value (say infimum) of this problem be the process
Vt ≡ V (p (t) , t), a functional of the CSI encoded in C (Tt ), depending on the positions of the relays
at time slot t.
Suppose that, at time slot t − 1, an oracle reveals C (Tt ≡ Tt−1 ∪ {p (t)}), which also determines
the channels corresponding to the new positions of the relays at the next time slot t. Then, we could
further consider optimizing Vt with respect to p (t), representing the new position of the relays. But
note that, C (Tt ) is not physically observable and in the absence of the oracle, optimizing Vt with
respect to p (t) is impossible, since, given C (Tt−1 ), the channels at any position of the relays are
nontrivial random variables. However, it is reasonable to search for the best decision on the positions
of the relays at time slot t, as a functional of the available information encoded in C (Tt−1 ), such
that Vt is optimized on average. This procedure may be formally formulated as a 2-stage stochastic
program [26],
minimize E {V (p (t) , t)}
p(t)
subject to p (t) ≡ M (C (Tt−1 )) ∈ C (po (t−1)) , ,
for some M : R4R(t−1) → R2R
(4.4)
2R
to be solved at each t−1 ∈ N+
⇒ R2R is a multifunction, with C (po (t − 1)) ⊆ S R
NT −1 , where C : R
representing a physically feasible spatial neighborhood around the point po (t − 1) ∈ S R , the decision
vector selected at time t − 2 ∈ NNT −2 (recall that t ≡ 0 denotes a dummy time slot). Note that, in
1
Caution is needed here, due to the possibility of physical collisions among relays themselves, or among relays and
other physical obstacles in the workspace, S. Nevertheless, for simplicity, we assume that either such events never
occur, or that, if they do, there exists some transparent collision avoidance mechanism implemented at each relay,
which is out of our direct control.
17
2nd Stage Problem at t − 1
Beamforming
Optimization
{fi , gi }: CSI at
(po (t − 1) , t − 1)
C(Tt−2 )
· ∪ {·}
w∗ (t − 1)
po (t) and
uot−1 (τ ) , τ ∈ ∆τt−1
1st Stage Problem at t
Relay Controller
C(Tt−1 ) Optimization
@ Time Slot t − 1
Figure 4.2: 2-Stage optimization of beamforming weights and spatial relay controllers. The variables
wo (t − 1), uot−1 and po (t) denote the optimal beamforming weights and relay controllers at time
slot t − 1, and the optimal relay positions at time slot t, respectively.
general, the decision selected at t − 2, po (t − 1), may not be an optimal decision for the respective
problem solved at t − 2 and implemented at t − 1. To distinguish po (t − 1) from an optimal
decision at t − 2, the latter will be denoted as p∗ (t − 1), for all t ∈ N2NT . Also note that, in order
for (4.4) to be well defined, important technical issues, such as measurability of Vt and existence
of its expectation at least for each feasible decision p (t), should be precisely resolved. Problem
(4.5), together with the respective beamforming problem with optimal value Vt (which will focus on
shortly) are referred to as the first-stage problem and the second-stage problem, respectively [26].
Hereafter, aligned with the literature, any feasible choice for the decision variable p (t) in (4.5), will
be interchangeably called an (admissible) policy. A generic block representation of the proposed
2-stage stochastic programming approach is depicted in Fig. 4.2.
Mainly due to the arbitrary structure of the function M, (4.4) is too general to consider, within
a reasonable analytical framework. Thus, let us slightly constrain the decision set of (4.4) to include
only measurable decisions, resulting in the formulation
minimize E {V (p (t) , t)}
p(t)
o
subject to p (t) ≡ M (C (T
t−1 )) ∈ C(p (t−1)) ,
,
−1
4R(t−1)
2R
M (A) ∈ B R
, ∀A ∈ B R
(4.5)
provided, of course, that the stochastic program (4.5) is well defined. The second constraint in (4.5)
is equivalent to M being Borel measurable, instead of being any arbitrary function, as in (4.4).
Provided its well definiteness, the stochastic program (4.5) is difficult to solve, most importantly
because of its variational character ; the decision variable p (t) is constrained to be a functional of
the CSI observed up to and including time t − 1. A very powerful tool, which will enable us to both
make (4.5) meaningful and overcome the aforementioned difficulty, is the Fundamental Lemma
of Stochastic Control [23–28], which in fact refers to a family of technical results related to the
interchangeability of integration (expectation) and minimization in general stochastic programming.
Under the framework of the Fundamental Lemma, in Appendix B, we present a detailed discussion,
best suited for the purposes of this paper, which is related to the important technical issues, arising
when one wishes to meaningfully define and tractably simplify “hard”, variational problems of the
form of (4.5).
18
In particular, Lemma 4, presented in Section 8.2.4 (Appendix B), identifies six sufficient technical
conditions (conditions C1-C6, see statement of Lemma 4), under which the variational problem
(4.5) is exchangeable by the structurally simpler, pointwise optimization problem
minimize E {V (p (t) , t) |C (Tt−1 ) }
p(t)
subject to p (t) ∈ C (po (t−1))
,
(4.6)
to be solved at each t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 . Observe that, in (4.6), the decision variable p (t) is constant, as
opposed to (4.5), where the decision variable p (t) is itself a functional of the observed information
at time slot t − 1, that is, a policy. Provided that CSI C (Tt−1 ) and po (t−1) are known and that the
involved conditional expectation can be somehow evaluated, (4.6) constitutes an ordinary, nonlinear
optimization problem.
If Lemma 4 is in power, exchangeability of (4.5) by (4.6) is understood in the sense that the optimal value of (4.5), which is a number, coincides with the expectation of optimal value of (4.6), which
turns out to be a measurable function of C (Tt−1 ). In other words, minimization is interchangeable
with integration, in the sense that
(
)
inf
p(t)∈Dt
E {V (p (t) , t)} ≡ E
info
p(t)∈C (p (t−1))
E {V (p (t) , t) |C (Tt−1 ) } ,
(4.7)
for all t ∈ N2NT , where Dt denotes the set of feasible decisions for (4.5). What is more, under the
aforementioned technical conditions of Lemma 4, exchangeability implies that, if there exists an
admissible policy of (4.5), say p∗ (t), which solves (4.6), then p∗ (t) is also optimal for (4.5). Additionally, Lemma 4 implies existence of at least one optimal solution to (4.6), which is simultaneously
feasible and, thus, optimal, for the original stochastic program (4.5). If, further, (4.6) features a
unique optimal solution, say p∗ (t), then p∗ (t) must be an optimal solution to (4.5).
In the next subsection, we will specify the optimal value of the second-stage subproblem, Vt , for
each time t ∈ N+
NT . That is, we will consider a fixed criterion for implementing relay beamforming
(recourse actions) at each t, after the predictive decisions on the positions of the relays have been
made (at time t − 1) and the relays have moved to their new positions, implying that the CSI at
time at time t has been revealed. Of course, one of the involved challenges will be to explicitly
show that Conditions C1-C6 are satisfied for each case considered, so that we can focus on solving
the ordinary nonlinear optimization problem (4.6), instead of the much more difficult variational
problem (4.5). The other challenge we will face is actually solving (4.6).
Remark 3. It would be important to note that the pointwise problem (4.5) admits a reasonable and
intuitive interpretation: At each time slot t − 1, instead of (deterministically) optimizing Vt with
respect to p (t) in C (po (t−1)), which is, of course, impossible, one considers optimizing a projection
of V (p, t), p ∈ S R onto the space of all measurable functionals of C (Tt−1 ), which corresponds to
the information observed by the relays, up to t − 1. Provided that, for every p ∈ S R , V (p, t) is in
the Hilbert space of square-integrable, real-valued functions relative to P, L2 (Ω, F , P; R), it is then
reasonable to consider orthogonal projections, that is, the Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE)
estimate, or, more accurately, prediction of V (p, t) given C (Tt−1 ). This, of course, coincides
with the conditional expectation E {V (p, t) |C (Tt−1 ) }. One then optimizes the random utility
E {V (p, t) |C (Tt−1 ) }, with respect to p in the random set C (po (t−1)), as in (4.6).
Although there is nothing technically wrong with actually starting with (4.6) as our initial
problem formulation, and essentially bypassing the technical difficulties of (4.5), the fact that the
19
objective of (4.6) depends on C (Tt−1 ) does not render it a useful optimality criterion. This is
because the objective of (4.6) quantifies the performance of a single decision, only conditioned on
C (Tt−1 ), despite the fact that an optimal solution to (4.6) (provided it exists) constitutes itself a
functional of C (Tt−1 ). In other words, the objective of (4.6) does not quantify the performance of
a policy (a decision rule); in order to do that, any reasonable performance criterion should assign a
number to each policy, ranking its quality, and not a function depending on C (Tt−1 ). The expected
utility E {Vt } of the variational problem (4.5) constitutes a suitable such criterion. And by the
Fundamental Lemma, (4.5) may be indeed reduced to (4.6), which can thus be regarded as a proxy
for solving the former.
There are two main reasons justifying our interest in policies, rather than individual decisions.
First, one should be interested in the long-term behavior of the beamforming (in our case) system,
in the sense that it should be possible to assess system performance if the system is used repeatedly
over time, e.g., periodically (every hour, day) or on demand. For example, consider a beamforming
system (the “experiment”), which operates for NT time slots and dependently restarts its operation
at time slots kNT +1, for k in some subset of N+ . This might be practically essential for maintaining
system stability over time, saving on resources, etc. It is then clear that merely quantifying the
performance of individual decisions is meaningless, from an operational point of view; simply, the
random utility approach quantifies performance only along a specific path of the observed information, C (Tt−1 ), for t ∈ N+
NT . This issue is more profound when channel observations taking specific
values correspond to events of zero measure (this is actually the case with the Gaussian channel
model introduced in Section 3). On the contrary, it is of interest to jointly quantify system performance when decisions are made for different outcomes of the sample space Ω. This immediately
results in the need for quantifying the performance of different policies (decision rules), and this is
only possible by considering variational optimization problems, such as (4.5).
Additionally, because decisions are made in stages, it is of great interest to consider how the
system performs across time slots, or, in other words, to discover temporal trends in performance,
if such trends exist. In particular, for the beamforming problem considered in this paper, we will
be able to theoretically characterize system behavior under both suboptimal and optimal decision
making, in the average (expected) sense (see Section 4.4), across all time slots; this is impossible to
do for each possible outcome of the sample space, individually, when the random utility approach
is considered.
The second main reason for considering the variational program (4.5) as our main objective,
instead of (4.6), is practical, and extremely important from an engineering point of view. The
expected utility approach assigns, at each time slot, a number to each policy, quantifying its quality.
Simulating repeatedly the system and invoking the Law of Large Numbers, one may obtain excellent
estimates of the expected performance of the system, quantified by the chosen utility. Therefore,
the systematic experimental assessment of a particular sequence of policies (one for each time slot)
is readily possible. Apparently, such experimental validation approach is impossible to perform by
adopting the random (conditional) utility approach, since the performance of the system will be
quantified via a real valued (in general) random quantity.
Remark 4. The stochastic programming methodology presented in this subsection is very general
and can support lots of choices in regard to the structure of the second-stage subproblem, Vt . As
shown in the discussion developed in Appendix B, the key to showing the validity of the Fundamental
Lemma is the set of conditions C1-C6. If these are satisfied, it is then possible to convert the
original, variational problem into a pointwise one, while strictly preserving optimality.
20
4.3
SINR Maximization at the Destination
The basic and fundamentally important beamforming criterion considered in this paper is that of
enhancing network QoS, or, in other words, maximizing the respective SINR at the destination,
subject to a total power budget at the relays. At each time slot t ∈ N+
NT , given CSI encoded in
T
C (Tt ) and with w (t) , [w1 (t) . . . wR (t)] , this may be achieved by formulating the constrained
optimization problem [1, 4]
E { PS (t)| C (Tt )}
E { PI+N (t)| C (Tt )}
maximize
w(t)
,
(4.8)
subject to E { PR (t)| C (Tt )} ≤ Pc
where PR (t), PS (t) and PI+N (t) denote the random instantaneous power at the relays, that of the
signal component and that of the interference plus noise component at the destination (see (2.2)),
respectively and where Pc > 0 denotes the total available relay transmission power. Using the
mutual independence assumptions regarding CSI related to the source and destination, respectively,
(4.8) can be reexpressed analytically as [1]
maximize
w(t)
wH (t) R (p (t) , t) w (t)
2
σD
+ wH (t) Q (p (t) , t) w (t) ,
subject to w
H
(4.9)
(t) D (p (t) , t) w (t) ≤ Pc
where, dropping the dependence on (p (t) , t) or t for brevity,
h
iT
2
2
2
D , P0 diag |f1 | |f2 | . . . |fR |
+ σ 2 IR ∈ SR
++ ,
T
R , P0 hhH ∈ SR
and
+ , with h , [f1 g1 f2 g2 . . . fR gR ]
h
iT
Q , σ 2 diag |g1 |2 |g2 |2 . . . |gR |2
∈ SR
++ .
(4.10)
(4.11)
(4.12)
Note that the program (4.9) is always feasible, as long as Pc is nonnegative. It is well known that
the optimal value of (4.9) can be expressed in closed form as [1]
−1
2
−1/2
−1/2
−1/2
−1/2
Vt ≡ V (p (t) , t) , Pc λmax
σD IR + Pc D
QD
D
RD
,
(4.13)
for all t ∈ N+
NT . Exploitting the structure of the matrices involved, Vt may also be expressed
analytically as [4]
Vt ≡
,
X
+
i∈NR
X
+
i∈NR
Pc P0 |f (pi (t) , t)|2 |g (pi (t) , t)|2
2
2
P0 σ D
|f (pi (t) , t)|2 + Pc σ 2 |g (pi (t) , t)|2 + σ 2 σD
VI (pi (t) , t) ,
∀t ∈ N+
NT .
21
(4.14)
Adopting the 2-stage stochastic optimization framework presented and discussed in Section 4.2, we
are now interested, at each time slot t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 , in the program
maximize E
p(t)
X
VI (pi (t) , t)
+
i∈NR
o
subject to p (t) ≡ M (C (T
t−1 )) ∈ C(p (t−1)) ,
M−1 (A) ∈ B R4R(t−1) , ∀A ∈ B R2R
,
(4.15)
where po (1) ∈ S R is a known constant, representing the initial positions of the relays. But in order
to be able to formulate (4.15) in a well defined manner fully and and simplify it by exploitting the
Fundamental Lemma, we have to explicitly verify Conditions C1-C6 of Lemma 4 in Section 8.2.4
of Appendix B. To this end, let us present a definition.
Definition 1. (Translated Multifunctions) Given nonempty sets H ⊂ RN , A ⊆ RN and any
fixed h ∈ H, D : RN ⇒ RN is called the (H, h)-translated
multifunction
in A, if and only if
n
o
N
D (y) , { x ∈ A| x − y ∈ H}, for all y ∈ A − h , x ∈ R x + h ∈ A .
Note that translated multifunctions, in the sense of Definition 1, are always unique and nonempty,
whenever y ∈ A − h. We also observe that, if y ∈
/ A − h, D (y) is undefined; in fact, outside A − h,
D may be defined arbitrarily, and this will be irrelevant in our analysis. The following assumption
on the structure of the compact-valued multifunction C : R2R ⇒ R2R is adopted hereafter, and for
the rest of this paper.
Assumption 2. (C is Translated) Given any arbitrary compact set 0 ∈ G, C constitutes the
corresponding (G, 0)-translated, compact-valued multifunction in S R .
Then, the following important result is true.
Theorem 3. (Verification Theorem / SINR Maximization) Suppose that, at time slot t−1 ∈
o
o
N+
NT −1 , the selected decision at t − 2, p (t − 1) ≡ p (ω, t − 1), is measurable relative to C (Tt−2 ).
Then, the stochastic program (4.15) satisfies conditions C1-C6 and the Fundamental Lemma applies
(see Appendix B, Section 8.2.4, Lemma 4). Additionally, as long as the pointwise program
maximize
p
X
+
i∈NR
E { VI (pi , t)| C (Tt−1 )}
(4.16)
o
subject to p ∈ C (p (t−1))
has a unique maximizer p∗ (t), and po (t) ≡ p∗ (t), then po (t) is C (Tt−1 )-measurable and the
condition of the theorem is automatically satisfied at time slot t.
Proof of Theorem 3. See Appendix C.
As Theorem 3 suggests, in order for conditions C1-C6 to be simultaneously satisfied for all
t ∈ N2NT , it is sufficient that the program (4.16) has a unique optimal solution, for each t. Although,
in general, such requirement might not be particularly appealing, for the problems of interest in
this paper, the event where (4.16) does not have a unique optimizer is extremely rare, almost never
22
occurring in practice. Nevertheless, uniqueness of the optimal solution to (4.16) does not constitute
a necessary condition for C (Tt−1 )-measurability of the optimal decision at time slot t − 1. For
instance, p∗ (t) will always be C (Tt−1 )-measurable when the compact-valued, closed multifunction
C : R2R ⇒ R2R is additionally finite-valued, and po (t) ≡ p∗ (t). This choice for C is particularly
useful for practical implementations. In any case, as long as conditions C1-C6 are guaranteed to be
satisfied, we may focus exclusively on the pointwise program (4.16), whose expected optimal value,
via the Fundamental Lemma, coincides with the optimal value of the original problem (4.15).
By definition, we readily observe that the problem (4.16) is separable. In fact, given that, for
each t ∈ N+
NT −1 , decisions taken and CSI collected so far are available to all relays, (4.16) can be
solved in a completely distributed fashion at the relays, with the i-th relay being responsible for
solving the program
maximize E { VI (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )}
p
,
(4.17)
subject to p ∈ Ci (po (t−1))
2
2
+
at each t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 , where Ci : R ⇒ R denotes the corresponding part of C, for each i ∈ NR .
Note that no local exchange of intermediate results is required among relays; given the available
information, each relay independently solves its own subproblem. It is also evident that apart
from the obvious difference in the feasible set, the optimization problems at each of the relays
are identical. The problem, however, with (4.17) is that its objective involves the evaluation of a
conditional expectation of a well defined ratio of almost surely positive random variables, which is
impossible to perform analytically. For this reason, it is imperative to resort to the development of
well behaved approximations to (4.17), which, at the same time, would facilitate implementation.
In the following, we present two such heuristic approaches.
4.3.1
Approximation by the Method of Statistical Differentials
The first idea we are going to explore is that of approximating the objective of (4.17) by truncated
Taylor expansions. Observe that VI can be equivalently expressed as
VI (p, t) ≡
1
2
σD
Pc
−2
|g (p, t)|
2
2
σ 2 σD
σ
+
|f (p, t)|−2 +
|f (p, t)|−2 |g (p, t)|−2
P0
Pc P0
,
1
,
VII (p, t)
(4.18)
2
for all (p, t) ∈ S × N+
NT . Then, for t ∈ NNT , we may locally approximate E { VI (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )}
around the point E { VII (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )} (see Section 3.14.2 in [21]; also known as the Method of
Statistical Differentials) via a first order Taylor expansion as
E { VI (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )} ≈
or via a second order Taylor expansion as
E { VI (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )} ≈
1
,
E { VII (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )}
n
o
E (VII (p, t))2 C (Tt−1 )
(E { VII (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )})3
(4.19)
,
where it is straightforward to show that the square on the numerator can be expanded as
!2
2
2
σ 2 σD
σ 2 σD
2
−4
−4
(VII (p, t)) ≡
|f (p, t)| |g (p, t)| + 2
|f (p, t)|−2 |g (p, t)|−2
Pc P0
Pc P0
23
(4.20)
!2
2
σD
σ2
σ2
|f (p, t)|−4 |g (p, t)|−2 + 2
+2
P0
Pc
P0
!2
!2
2
σ2
σD
+
|f (p, t)|−4 +
|g (p, t)|−4 .
P0
Pc
2
σD
Pc
!2
|f (p, t)|−2 |g (p, t)|−4
(4.21)
The approximate formula (4.20) may be in fact computed in closed form at any point p ∈ S, thanks
to the following technical, but simple, result.
Lemma 2. (Big Expectations) Under the wireless channel model introduced in Section 3, it is
true that, at any p ∈ S,
F,G
[F (p, t) G (p, t)]T C (Tt−1 ) ∼ N µF,G
(p)
,
Σ
(p)
,
(4.22)
t|t−1
t|t−1
for all t ∈ N2NT , and where we define
h
iT
F
G
µF,G
(p),
µ
(p)
µ
(p)
,
t|t−1
t|t−1
t|t−1
(4.23)
µFt|t−1 (p),αS (p) ` + cF1:t−1 (p) Σ−1
1:t−1 m1:t−1 −µ1:t−1 ∈ R,
−1
µGt|t−1 (p),αD (p) ` + cG
1:t−1 (p) Σ1:t−1 m1:t−1 −µ1:t−1 ∈ R and
"
"
#
#T
kp −p k
2
2
2 − S δD 2
F
F
η
+
σ
η
e
c
(p)
c
(p)
ξ
1:t−1
− 1:t−1
ΣF,G
Σ−1
∈ S2++ ,
1:t−1
G
kp −p k
t|t−1 (p),
cG
(p)
c
(p)
2 − S δD 2
2
2
1:t−1
1:t−1
η e
η + σξ
(4.24)
(4.25)
(4.26)
with
h
iT
m1:t−1 , F T (1) GT (1) . . . F T (t − 1) GT (t − 1) ∈ R2R(t−1)×1 ,
µ1:t−1 ,[αS (p (1)) αD (p (1)) . . . αS (p (t − 1)) αD (p (t − 1))]T ` ∈ R2R(t−1)×1 ,
h
i
cF1:t−1 (p), cF1 (p) . . . cFt−1 (p) ∈ R1×2R(t−1) ,
h
i
G
G
1×2R(t−1)
cG
,
1:t−1 (p), c1 (p) . . . ct−1 (p) ∈ R
n n
oo
oo
n n
j
F
j
ck (p), E σS (p, t) σS (k)
E σS (p, t) σD (k)
, ∀k ∈ N+
t−1
+
+
j∈NR
j∈NR
n n
oo
n n
oo
j
cG
E σD (p, t) σSj (k)
E
σ
(p,
t)
σ
(k)
, ∀k ∈ N+
t−1 and
k (p),
D
+
+
D
j∈NR
j∈NR
Σ (1, 1)
···
Σ (1, t − 1)
2R(t−1)
..
..
..
Σ1:t−1 ,
,
∈ S++
.
.
.
(4.27)
(4.28)
(4.29)
(4.30)
(4.31)
(4.32)
(4.33)
Σ (t − 1, 1) · · · Σ (t − 1, t − 1)
for all (p, t) ∈ S × N2NT . Further, for any choice of (m, n) ∈ Z × Z, the conditional correlation of
the fields |f (p, t)|m and |g (p, t)|n relative to C (Tt−1 ) may be expressed in closed form as
E { |f (p, t)|m |g (p, t)|n | C (Tt−1 )}
24
T
2 T
!
log
(10)
log
(10)
m
m
m
≡10(m+n)ρ/20 exp
µF,G
(p)+
ΣF,G
(p)
, (4.34)
t|t−1
t|t−1
n
n
n
20
20
at any p ∈ S and for all t ∈ N2NT .
Proof of Lemma 2. See Appendix C.
Since, by exploitting Lemma 2 and (4.21), formula (4.20) can be evaluated without any particular
difficulty, we now propose the replacement of the original pointwise problem of interest, (4.17), with
either of the heuristics
1
maximize
p
E { VII (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )}
(4.35)
o
subject to p ∈ Ci (p (t−1))
and
maximize
p
n
o
E (VII (p, t))2 C (Tt−1 )
(E { VII (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )})3 ,
(4.36)
o
subject to p ∈ Ci (p (t−1))
+
to be solved at relay i ∈ N+
R , at each time t − 1 ∈ NNT −1 , depending on the order of approximation
employed, respectively. Observe that Jensen’s Inequality directly implies that the objective of (4.35)
is always lower than or equal than that of (4.36) and that of the original program (4.17), conditioned,
of course, on identical information. As a result, (4.35) is also a lower bound relaxation to (4.17). On
the other hand, the objective of (4.35) might be desirable in practice, since it is easier to compute.
Both approximations are technically well behaved, though, as made precise by the next theorem.
Theorem 4. (Behavior of Approximation Chains I / SINR Maximization) Both heuristics
(4.35) and (4.36) each feature at least one measurable maximizer. Therefore, provided that any of
the two heuristics is solved at each time slot t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 , that the selected one features a unique
∗
∗
o
e (t), and that p
e (t) ≡ p (t), for all t ∈ N2NT , the produced decision chain is measurable
maximizer, p
and condition C2 is satisfied at all times.
Proof of Theorem 4. See Appendix C.
Theorem 4 implies that, at each time slot t ∈ N+
NT −1 and under the respective conditions, the
chosen heuristic constitutes a well defined approximation to the original problem, (4.17) and, in
turn, to (4.15), in the sense that all conditions C1-C4 are satisfied.
At this point, it will be important to note that, for each p ∈ S, computation of the conditional
mean and covariance in (4.22) of Lemma 2 require execution of matrix operations, which are of
expanding dimension in t ∈ N2NT ; observe that, for instance, the covariance matrix Σ1:t−1 is of
size 2R (t − 1), which is increasing in t ∈ N2NT . Fortunately, however, the increase is linear in t.
Additionally, the reader may readily observe that the inversion of the covariance matrix Σ1:t−1
constitutes the computationally dominant operation in the long formulas of Lemma 2. The computational complexity of this matrix inversion, which takes place at each time slot t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 , is,
3 3
in general, of the order of O R t elementary operations. Fortunately though, we may exploit the
25
Matrix Inversion Lemma, in order to reduce
the computational complexity of the aforementioned
3 2
matrix inversion to the order of O R t . Indeed, by construction, Σ1:t−1 may be expressed as
Σ1:t−1
where
Σ1:t−2
≡
T
(Σc1:t−2 )
Σc1:t−2
,
Σ (t − 1, t − 1)
(4.37)
Σc1:t−2 , [Σ (1, t − 1) . . . Σ (t − 2, t − 1)]T ∈ R2R(t−2)×2R .
Invoking the Matrix Inversion Lemma, we obtain the recursive expression
T
−1
−1
c
−1
c
−1
−1
c
−1
Σ
+ Σ1:t−2 Σ1:t−2 St−1 (Σ1:t−2 ) Σ1:t−2 −Σ1:t−2 Σ1:t−2 St−1
1:t−2
,
Σ−1
1:t−1 =
T
c
−1
−1
−S−1
(Σ
)
Σ
S
t−1
1:t−2
1:t−2
t−1
c
2R
St−1 , Σ (t − 1, t − 1) − (Σc1:t−2 ) Σ−1
1:t−2 Σ1:t−2 ∈ S++ ,
T
(4.38)
with
(4.39)
(4.40)
where St−1 is the respective Schur complement. From (4.39) and (4.40), it can be easily verified
c
3 2
.
that the most computationally demanding operation involved is Σ−1
Σ
,
of
order
O
R
t
1:t−2 1:t−2
Since the inversion of St−1 is of the order of O R3 , we arrive at a total complexity of O R3 t2
elementary operations of the recursive scheme presented above, and implemented at each time slot
t−1. The achieved reduction in complexity is important. In most scenarios, R, the number of relays,
will be relatively small and fixed for the whole operation of the system, whereas t, the time slot
index, might generally take large values, since it is common for the operational horizon of the system,
NT , to be large. Additionally, the reader may readily observe that the aforementioned covariance
matrix is independent of the position at which the channel is predicted, p. As a result, its inversion
may be performed just once in each time slot, for all evaluations of the mean and covariance of
the Gaussian density in (4.22), for all different choices of p on a fixed grid (say). Consequently, if
the total number of such evaluations is P ∈ N+ , and recalling that the complexity for a matrixvector multiplication is quadratic in the dimension of the quantities involved,
then, at worst,
the
2 2
3 2
total computational complexity for channel prediction is of the order of O P R t + R t , at each
t − 1 ∈ N+
would have to be able
NT −1 . This means that a potential actual computational system
to execute matrix operations with complexity at most of the order of O P R2 NT2 + R3 NT2 , which
constitutes the worst case complexity, over all NT time slots. The analysis above characterizes the
complexity for solving either of the heuristics (4.35) and (4.36), if the feasible set Ci is assumed to
be finite, for all i ∈ N+
R . Of course, if the quantity RNT is considered a fixed constant, implying
that computation of the mean and covariance in (4.22) is considered the result of a black box with
fixed (worst) execution time and with input p, then, at each t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 , the total computational
complexity for channel prediction is of the order of O (P ) function evaluations, that is, linear in P .
4.3.2
Brute Force
The second approach to the solution of (4.17), considered in this section, is based on the fact
that the objective of the aforementioned program can be evaluated rather efficiently, relying on the
multidimensional Gauss-Hermite Quadrature Rule [40], which constitutes a readily available routine
for numerical integration. It is particularly effective for computing expectations of complicated
functions of Gaussian random variables [41]. This is indeed the case here, as shown below.
26
Leveraging Lemma 2 and as it can also be seen in the proof of Theorem 3 (condition C6), the
objective of (4.17) can be equivalently represented, for all t ∈ N2NT , via a Lebesgue integral as
Z
F,G
r (x) N x; µF,G
(p)
,
Σ
(p)
dx,
(4.41)
E { VI (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )} =
t|t−1
t|t−1
2
R
for any choice of p ∈ S, where N (·; µ, Σ) : R2 → R++ denotes the bivariate Gaussian density, with
2
mean µ ∈ R2×1 and covariance Σ ∈ S2×2
+ , and the function r : R → R++ is defined exploitting the
trick (3.11) as
r (x) ≡ r (x1 , x2 ) ,
Pc P0 102ρ/10 [exp (x1 + x2 )]
2
P0 σD
[exp (x1 )]
log(10)
10
+ Pc σ 2 [exp (x2 )]
log(10)
10
log(10)
10
2
+ 10−ρ/10 σ 2 σD
,
(4.42)
for all x ≡ (x1 , x2 ) ∈ R2 . Exploitting the Lebesgue integral representation (4.41), it can be easily
shown that the conditional expectation may be closely approximated by the double summation
formula (see Section IV in [41])
q
X
X
F,G
F,G
E { VI (p, t)| C (Tt−1 )} ≈
$l 1
$l 2 r
Σ t|t−1(p)q (l1 ,l2 ) + µ t|t−1(p) ,
(4.43)
+
l1 ∈NM
+
l2 ∈NM
T
where M ∈ N+ denotes the quadrature resolution, q (l1 ,l2 ) , ql1 ql2 ∈ R2×1 denotes the (l1 , l2 )-th
T
quadrature point and $ (l1 ,l2 ) , $l1 $l2 ∈ R2×1 denotes respective weighting coefficient, for all
+
(l1 , l2 ) ∈ N+
M × NM . Both sets of quadrature points and weighting coefficients are automatically
selected apriori and independently in each dimension, via the following simple procedure [41, 42].
Let us define a matrix J ∈ RM ×M , such that
r
min {i, j}
, |j − i| ≡ 1
+
, ∀ (i, j) ∈ N+
(4.44)
J (i, j) ,
2
M × NM .
0,
otherwise
That is, J constitutes a hollow, tridiagonal, symmetric matrix. Let the sets {λi (J ) ∈ R}i∈N+
M
n
o
M ×1
and v i (J ) ∈ R
contain the eigenvalues and normalized eigenvectors of J , respectively.
+
i∈NM
Then, simply, quadrature points and the respective weighting coefficients are selected independently
in each dimension j ∈ {1, 2} as
√
qlj ≡ 2λlj (J ) and
(4.45)
2
$lj ≡ v lj (J ) (1) , ∀lj ∈ N+
(4.46)
M.
In (4.46), v lj (J ) (1) denotes the first entry of the involved vector.
Under the above considerations, in this subsection, we propose, for a sufficiently large number
of quadrature points M , the replacement of the original pointwise problem (4.17) with the heuristic
q
X
F,G
F,G
maximize
$l1 $l2 r
Σ t|t−1(p)q (l1 ,l2 ) + µ t|t−1(p)
p
+
+
,
(4.47)
(l1 ,l2 )∈NM ×NM
subject to p ∈ Ci (po (t−1))
27
+
to be solved at relay i ∈ N+
R , at each time t − 1 ∈ NNT −1 . As in Section 4.3.1 above, the following
result is in power, concerning the technical consistency of the decision chain produced by considering
the approximate program (4.47), for all t ∈ N2NT . Proof is omitted, as it is essentially identical to
that of Theorem 4.
Theorem 5. (Behavior of Approximation Chains II / SINR Maximization) Consider the
the heuristic (4.47). Then, under the same circumstances, all conclusions of Theorem 4 hold true.
Since the computations in (4.45) and (4.46) do not depend on p or the information collected so
far, encoded in C (Tt−1 ), for t ∈ N2NT , quadrature points and the respective weights can be determined offline and stored in memory. Therefore, the computational burden of (4.43) concentrates
solely
on
the computation of an inner product, whose
q computational complexity
is of the order of
2
2
F,G
F,G
O M , as well as a total of M evaluations of r Σ t|t−1(p)q (l1 ,l2 ) +µ t|t−1(p) , for each value of
F,G
p. Excluding temporarily the computational burden of µF,G
t|t−1 (p) and Σ t|t−1 (p), each of the latter
evaluations is of fixed complexity, since each involves elementary operations among matrices and
vectors in R2×2 and R2×1 , respectively and, additionally, the involved matrix square root can be
evaluated in closed form, via the formula [43]
r
F,G
Σ t|t−1(p) + det ΣF,G
(p)
I2
q
t|t−1
2×2
s
ΣF,G
∈ S+
,
(4.48)
(p)
≡
r
t|t−1
F,G
tr ΣF,G
t|t−1 (p) + 2 det Σ t|t−1 (p)
where we have taken into account that ΣF,G
t|t−1 (p) is always a (conditional) covariance matrix and,
thus, (conditionally) positive semidefinite. As a result and considering the last paragraph of Section
4.3.1, if (4.43) is evaluated on a finite grid of possible locations, say P ∈ N+ , then, at each t − 1 ∈
N+
complexity of the Gauss-Hermite Quadrature Rule outlined above
NT −1 , the total computational
is of the order of O P M 2 + P R2 t2 + R3 t2 elementary operations / function evaluations. This will
be the total, worst case computational complexity for solving (4.47), if the feasible set Ci is assumed
to be finite, for all i ∈ N+
R . As noted above, a finite feasible set greatly simplifies implementation,
since a trial-and-error approach may be employed for solving the respective optimization problem.
If M is considered a fixed constant (e.g., M ≡ 103 ), and the same holds for Rt ≤ RNT , then, in
each time slot, the total complexity of the Gauss-Hermite Quadrature Rule is of the order of O (P )
evaluations of (4.43), that is, linear in P . In that case, the whole numerical integration routine is
considered a black box of fixed computational load, which, in each time slot, takes p as its input.
Observe that, whenever M ≈ RNT , the worst case complexity of the brute force method, described
in this subsection, over all NT time slots, is essentially the same as that of the Taylor approximation
method, presented earlier in Section 4.3.1.
4.4
Theoretical Guarantees: Network QoS Increases Across Time Slots
The proposed relay position selection approach presented in Section 4.3 enjoys a very important and
useful feature, initially observed via numerical simulations: Although a 2-stage stochastic programming procedure is utilized independently at each time slot for determining optimal relay positioning
and beamforming weights at the next time slot, the average network QoS (that is, the achieved
28
SINR) actually increases, as a function of time (the time slot). Then, it was somewhat surprising
to discover that, additionally, this behavior of the achieved SINR can be predicted theoretically, in
an indeed elegant manner and, as it will be clear below, under mild and reasonable assumptions
on the structure of the spatially controlled beamforming problem under consideration. But first, it
would be necessary to introduce the following definition.
Definition 2. (L.MD.G Fields) On (Ω, F , P), an integrable stochastic field Ξ : Ω × RN × N → R
is said to be a Linear Martingale Difference (MD) Generator, relative to a filtration {Ht ⊆ F }t∈N ,
and with scaling factor µ ∈ R, or, equivalently, L.MD.G♦ (Ht , µ), if and only if, for each t ∈ N+ ,
there exists a measurable set Ωt ⊆ Ω, with P (Ωt ) ≡ 1, such that, for every x ∈ RN , it is true that
E { Ξ (x, t)| Ht−1 } (ω) ≡ µE { Ξ (x, t − 1)| Ht−1 } (ω) ,
(4.49)
for all ω ∈ Ωt .
Remark 5. A fine detail in the definition of a L.MD.G♦(Ht , µ) field is that, for each t ∈ N, the
event Ωt does not depend on the choice of point x ∈ RN . Nevertheless, even if the event where
(4.49) is satisfied is indeed dependent on the particular x ∈ RN , let us denote it as Ωx,t , we may
leverage the fact that conditional expectations are unique almost everywhere, and arbitrarily define
E { Ξ (x, t)| Ht−1 } (ω) , µE { Ξ (x, t − 1)| Ht−1 } (ω) ,
(4.50)
for all ω ∈ Ωcx,t , where P Ωcx,t ≡ 0. That is, we modify both, or either of the random elements
E { Ξ (x, t − 1)| Ht−1 } and E { Ξ (x, t)| Ht−1 }, on the null set Ωcx,t , such that (4.49) is satisfied. Then,
it may be easily verified that both such modifications result in valid versions of the conditional
expectations of Ξ (x, t − 1) and Ξ (x, t) relative to Ht−1 , respectively and satisfy property (4.49),
everywhere with respect to ω ∈ Ω.
In Definition 2, invariance of Ωt with respect to x ∈ RN , in conjunction with the power of the
substitution rule for conditional expectations (Section 8.2.1), will allow the development of strong
conditional arguments, when x is replaced by a random element, measurable relative to Ht−1 .
Remark 6. There are lots of examples of L.MD.G stochastic fields, satisfying the technical properties of Definition 2. For completeness, let us present two such examples. Employing generic
notation, consider an integrable real-valued stochastic field n
Y (x, t), x ∈ RN , to∈ N. Let the natural
filtration associated with Y (x, t) be {Yt }t∈N , with Yt , σ Y (x, t) , x ∈ RN , for all t ∈ N. Also,
consider another, for simplicity temporal, integrable real-valued process W (t) , t ∈ N. Suppose,
further, that Y (x, t) is a martingale with respect to t ∈ N (relative to {Yt }t∈N ), and that W (t)
+
is a zero mean process, independent of Y (x, t). In particular,
we assume
that,
for every t ∈ N ,
Y
there exist events ΩYt ⊆ Ω and ΩW
≡ 1 and P ΩW
≡ 1, such that, for
t ⊆ Ω, satisfying P Ωt
t
all x ∈ RN ,
E { Y (x, t)| Yt−1 } (ω) ≡ Y (ω, x, t − 1)
and
(4.51)
E { W (t)| Yt−1 } (ω) ≡ 0,
(4.52)
T W
T W
for all ω ∈ ΩYt
Ωt , where, apparently, P ΩYt
Ωt ≡ 1.
Our first, probably most basic example of a L.MD.G field is simply the martingale Y (x, t)
itself. Of course, in order to verify this statement, we need to show that it satisfies the technical
29
requirements of Definition 2, relative to a given filtration; in particular, let us choose {Yt }t∈N to be
that filtration. Then, for every (x, t) ∈ RN × N+ , it is trivial to see that
E { Y (x, t)| Yt−1 } (ω) ≡ Y (ω, x, t − 1) ≡ E { Y (x, t − 1)| Yt−1 } (ω) ,
(4.53)
for all ω ∈ ΩYt , where Y (x, t − 1) is chosen as our version of E { Y (x, t − 1)| Yt−1 }, everywhere in
Ω. As a result, the martingale Y (x, t) is itself a L.MD.G♦ (Yt , 1), as expected.
The second, somewhat more interesting example of a L.MD.G field is defined as
X (x, t) , %Y (x, t) + W (t) ,
(4.54)
for all (x, t) ∈ RN × N, where, say, 0 < % ≤ 1. In order to verify the technical requirements of
Definition 2, let us again choose {Yt }t∈N as our filtration.
Then, for every (x, t) ∈ RN × N+ , there
Y,W
exists a measurable set ΩY,W
x,t ⊆ Ω, with P Ωx,t
≡ 1, such that, for all ω ∈ ΩY,W
x,t ,
E { X (x, t)| Yt−1 } (ω) ≡ %Y (ω, x, t − 1) + E {W (t)}
≡ %Y (ω, x, t − 1) .
(4.55)
Therefore, we may choose our version for E { X (x, t)| Yt−1 } as
E { X (x, t)| Yt−1 } (ω) ≡ %Y (ω, x, t − 1) ,
∀ω ∈ Ω.
(4.56)
In exactly the same fashion, we may choose, for every (x, t) ∈ RN × N+ ,
E { X (x, t − 1)| Yt−1 } (ω) ≡ %Y (ω, x, t − 1) ,
∀ω ∈ Ω.
(4.57)
Consequently, for every (x, t) ∈ RN × N+ , it will be true that
E { X (x, t)| Yt−1 } (ω) ≡ %Y (ω, x, t − 1) ≡ E { X (x, t − 1)| Yt−1 } (ω) ,
for all ω ∈ Ω, showing that the field X (x, t) is also L.MD.G♦ (Yt , 1).
(4.58)
Leveraging the notion of a L.MD.G field, the following result may be proven, characterizing
the temporal (in discrete time) evolution of the objective of myopic stochastic
o programs of the form
n
↑
of (4.5). In order to introduce the result, let us consider the family Pt
, with Pt↑ being
+
t∈NN
the limit σ-algebra generated by all admissible policies at time slot t, defined as
[
Pt↑ , σ
σ {p (t)} ⊆ C (Tt−1 ) , ∀t ∈ N+
NT ,
T
(4.59)
p(t)∈Dt
with P1↑ being the trivial σ-algebra; recall that p (1) ∈ S R is assumed to be a constant. Also, for
every t ∈ N+
NT , let us define the class
n
o
Dt ≡ p : Ω → S R p−1 (A) ∈ Pt↑ , for all A ∈ B S R .
The result now follows.
30
(4.60)
Theorem 6. (L.MD.G Objectives Increase over Time) Consider, for each t ∈ N2NT , the
maximization version of the 2-stage stochastic program (4.5), for some choice of the second-stage
optimal value V (p, t), p ∈ S R , t ∈ N2NT . Suppose that conditions C1-C6 are satisfied at all times
and let p∗ (t) denote an optimal solution to (4.5), decided at t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 . Suppose, further, that,
for every t ∈ N+
,
NT
n
o
• V (p, t) is L.MD.G♦ (Ht , µ), for a filtration Ht ⊇ Pt↑
and some µ ∈ R, and that
+
t∈NN
T
• V (·, ·, t) is both SP ♦CHt and SP ♦CHt−1 , with Dt ⊆ CHt ⊆ IHt (Remark 11 / Section 8.2.1).
Then, for any admissible policy po (t − 1), it is true that
µE {V (po (t − 1) , t − 1)} ≡ E {V (po (t − 1) , t)} and
µE V p∗ (t − 1) , t − 1 ≤ E V p∗ (t) , t , ∀t ∈ N2NT .
(4.61)
(4.62)
In particular, if µ ≡ 1, the objective: • does not decrease by not updating the decision variable, and
• is nondecreasing over time, under optimal decision making.
Proof of Theorem 6. See Appendix C.
Of all possible choices for µ, the one where µ ≡ 1 is of special importance and practical relevance,
as we will see in the next. In particular, in this case, and provided that the respective assumptions
are fulfilled, Theorem 6 implies that optimal myopic exploration of the random field V (p, t) is
monotonic, either under optimal decision making, or by retaining the same policy next.
In the case where µ 6= 1, things can be quite interesting as well. For instance, suppose that
one focuses on the maximization counterpart of the stochastic program (4.5). In this case, it is of
interest to sequentially, myopically and feasibly sample the field V (p, t), such that it is maximized on
average. Let us also refer to V (p, t) as the reward of the sampling process. Additionally, suppose
that V (p, t) is a L.MD.G field, with parameter µ ≡ 0.9 < 1. Assuming that the respective
assumptions are satisfied, Theorem 6 implies that, for any admissible sampling policy po (t − 1),
E{V (po (t − 1) , t)}≡0.9E{V (po (t − 1) , t − 1)} and
E V p∗ (t) , t ≥0.9E V p∗ (t − 1) , t − 1 ,
(4.63)
(4.64)
for all t ∈ N2NT . In other words, either performing optimal decision making, or retaining the same
policy next, will result in an at most 10% loss of performance. This means that the performance of
optimal sampling at the next time step cannot be worse than 90% of that at the current time slot.
Of course, this is important, because, in a sense, the risk of (non-)maintaining the average reward
achieved up to the current time slot is meaningfully quantified.
Remark 7. When the stochastic program under study is separable, that is, when the objective is of
the form
X
V (p (t) , t) ≡
Vi (pi (t) , t)
(4.65)
+
i∈NM
(and the respective constraints of the problem decoupled), then, in order to reach the conclusions
of Theorem 6 for V , it suffices for Theorem 6 to hold individually for each Vi , i ∈ N+
M . This is true,
for instance, for the spatially controlled beamforming problem (4.15).
31
We may now return to the beamforming problem under consideration, namely (4.15). By Remark 7 and Theorem 6, it would suffice if we could show that the field VI (p, t) is a linear MD
generator, relative to a properly chosen filtration. Unfortunately, though, this does not seem to be
the case; the statistical structure of VI (p, t) does not match that of a linear MD generator exactly,
relative to any reasonably chosen filtration. Nevertheless, under the channel model of Section 3,
it is indeed possible to show that VI (p, t) is approximately L.MD.G♦ (C (Tt−1 ) , 1), a fact that
explains, in an elegant manner, why our proposed spatially controlled beamforming framework is
expected to work so well, both under optimal and suboptimal decision making.
To show that VI (p, t) is approximately L.MD.G♦ (C (Tt−1 ) , 1), simply consider projecting
VI (p, t − 1) onto C (Tt−2 ), via the conditional expectation E { VI (p, t − 1)| C (Tt−2 )}. Of course,
and based on what we have seen so far, E { VI (p, t − 1)| C (Tt−2 )} can be written as a Lebesgue
integral of VI (p, t − 1) expressed in terms of the vector field [F (p, t − 1) G (p, t − 1)]T , times
its conditional density relative to C (Tt−2 ). It then easy to see that this conditional density
will be, of course, Gaussian, and will be of exactly the same form as the conditional density of
[F (p, t) G (p, t)]T relative to C (Tt−1 ), as presented in Lemma 2, but with t replaced by t − 1. Likewise, E { VI (p, t)| C (Tt−2 )} is of the same form as E { VI (p, t − 1)| C (Tt−2 )}, but with all terms
1
2
t−2
exp −
, exp −
, . . . , exp −
(4.66)
γ
γ
γ
simply replaced by
2
exp −
γ
3
, exp −
γ
for all t ∈ N3NT . Of course, if t ≡ 2, we have
t−1
, . . . , exp −
γ
,
E { VI (p, 2)| C (T0 )} ≡ E {VI (p, 2)}
≡ E {VI (p, 1)} ≡ E { VI (p, 1)| C (T0 )} .
Now, for γ sufficiently large, we may approximately write
x
x+1
≈ exp −
,
exp −
γ
γ
∀x > 1,
(4.67)
(4.68)
(4.69)
and, therefore, due to continuity, it should be true that
E { VI (p, t)| C (Tt−2 )} ≈ E { VI (p, t − 1)| C (Tt−2 )} ,
(4.70)
for all t ∈ N2NT (and everywhere with respect to ω ∈ Ω). As a result, we have shown that, at
least approximately, VI (p, t) is L.MD.G♦ (C (Tt−1 ) , 1). We may then invoke Theorem 6 in an
approximate manner, leading to the following important result. Hereafter, for x ∈ R and y ∈ R,
x . y will imply that x is approximately smaller or equal than y, in the sense that x ≤ y + ε, where
ε > 0 is some small slack.
Theorem 7. (QoS Increases over Time Slots) Consider the separable stochastic program (4.15).
For γ sufficiently large, and for any admissible policy po (t − 1), it is true that
E {VI (poi (t − 1) , t − 1)} ≈ E {VI (poi (t − 1) , t)} ,
E VI p∗i (t − 1) , t − 1 . E VI p∗i (t) , t , ∀i ∈ N+
R
32
(4.71)
(4.72)
E {V (po (t − 1) , t − 1)} ≈ E {V (po (t − 1) , t)}
E V p∗ (t − 1) , t − 1 . E V p∗ (t) , t ,
and
(4.73)
(4.74)
for all t ∈ N2NT . In other words, approximately, the average network QoS: • does not decrease by
not updating the positions of the relays and • is nondecreasing across time slots, under (per relay)
optimal decision making.
Theorem 7 is very important from a practical point of view, and has the following additional
implications. Roughly speaking, under the conditions of Theorem 7, that is, if the temporal interactions of the channel are sufficiently strong, the average network QoS is not (approximately)
expected to, at least abruptly, decrease if one or more relays stop moving at some point. Such
event might indeed happen in an actual autonomous network, possibly due to power limitations,
or a failure in the motion mechanisms of some network nodes. In the same framework, Theorem 7
implies that the relays which continue moving contribute (approximately) positively to increasing
the average network QoS, across time slots. Such behavior of the proposed spatially controlled
beamforming system may be also confirmed numerically, as discussed in Section 5. For the record,
and as it will be also shown in Section 5, relatively small values for the correlation time γ, such as
γ ≡ 5, are sufficient in order to practically observe the nice system behavior promised by Theorem
7. This fact makes the proposed spatially controlled beamforming system attractive in terms of
practical feasibility, and shows that such an approach could actually enhance system performance
in a well-behaved, real world situation.
5
Numerical Simulations & Experimental Validation
In this section, we present synthetic numerical simulations, which essentially confirm that the proposed approach, previously presented in Section 4, actually works, and results in relay motion
control policies, which yield improved beamforming performance. All synthetic experiments were
conducted on an imaginary square terrain of dimensions 30 × 30 squared units of length, with
W ≡ [0, 30]2 , uniformly divided into 30 × 30 ≡ 900 square regions. The locations of the source and
destination are fixed as pS ≡ [15 0]T and pD ≡ [15 30]T . The beamforming temporal horizon is
chosen as T ≡ 40 and the number of relays is fixed at R ≡ 8. The wavelength is chosen as λ ≡ 0.125,
corresponding to a carrier frequency of 2.4 GHz. The various parameters of the assumed channel
model are set as ` ≡ 3, ρ ≡ 20, σξ2 ≡ 20, η 2 ≡ 50, β ≡ 10, γ ≡ 5 and δ ≡ 1. The variances of
2
the reception noises at the relays and the destination are fixed as σ 2 ≡ σD
≡ 1. Lastly, both the
transmission power of the source and the total transmission power budget of the relays are chosen
as P ≡ Pc ≡ 25 (≈ 14dB) units of power.
The relays are restricted to the rectangular region S ≡ [0, 30] × [12, 18]. Further, at each
time instant, each of the relays is allowed to move inside a 9-region area, centered at each current
position, thus defining its closed set of feasible directions Ci , for each relay i ∈ N+
R . Basic collision
and out-of-bounds control was also considered and implemented.
In order to assess the effectiveness of our proposed approach, we compare both heuristics (4.35)
and (4.36) against the case where an agnostic, purely randomized relay control policy is adopted;
in this case, at each time slot, each relay moves randomly to a new available position, without
taking previously observed CSI into consideration. For simplicity, we do not consider the brute
force method presented earlier in Section 4.3.2. For reference, we also consider the performance
+
of an oracle control policy at the relays, where, at each time slot t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 , relay i ∈ NR
33
10
8
6
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
12
10
8
6
Figure 5.1: Comparison of the proposed strategic relay planning schemes, versus an agnostic, randomized relay motion policy.
updates its position by noncausally looking into the future and choosing the position pi , which
maximizes directly the quantity VI (pi , t), over Ci (pi (t − 1)). Of course, the comparison of all
controlled systems is made under exactly the same communication environment.
Fig. 5.1 shows the expectation and standard deviation of the achieved QoS for all controlled
systems, approximated by executing 4000 trials of the whole experiment. As seen in the figure, there
is a clear advantage in exploiting strategically designed relay motion control. Whereas the agnostic
system maintains an average SINR of about 4 dB at all times, the system based on the proposed
2nd order heuristic (4.36) is clearly superior, exhibiting an increasing trend in the achieved SINR,
with a gap starting from about 0.5 dB at time slot t ≡ 2, up to 3 dB at time slots t ≡ 10, 11, . . . , 40.
The 1st order heuristic (4.35) comes second, with always slightly lower average SINR, and which
also exhibits a similar increasing trend as the 2nd order heuristic (4.36). Additionally, it seems to
converge to the performance achieved by (4.36), across time slots. The existence of an increasing
trend in the achieved average network QoS has already been predicted by Theorem 6 for a strictly
optimal policy, and our experiments confirm this behavior for both heuristics (4.35) and (4.36), as
well. This shows that both heuristics constitute excellent approximations to the original problem
(4.17). Consequently, it is both theoretically and experimentally verified that, although the proposed stochastic programming formulation is essentially myopic, the resulting system performance
is not, and this is dependent on the fact that the channel exhibits non trivial temporal statistical
interactions. We should also comment on the standard deviation of all systems, which, from Fig.
5.1, seems somewhat high, relative to the range of the respective average SINR. This is exclusively
due to the wild variations of the channel, which, in turn, are due to the effects of shadowing and
multipath fading; it is not due to the adopted beamforming technique. This is reasonable, since,
when the channel is not actually in deep fade at time t (an event which might happen with positive
34
R ≡ 8, # of Trials: 4000
7
R ≡ 8, # of Trials: 4000
Random Failures
iff t ∈ [12, 15]
Random Failures
iff t ∈ [5, 6]
6.5
Expected SINR (dB)
Expected SINR (dB)
6.5
Strategic: 0 failures
Strategic: 1 failures
Strategic: 3 failures
Strategic: 5 failures
Agnostic (0 failures)
6
5.5
6
Strategic: 0 failures
Strategic: 1 failures
Strategic: 3 failures
Strategic: 5 failures
Agnostic (0 failures)
5.5
5
5
4.5
4.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
2
6
8
10
12
Time Slot (t)
(a)
(b)
R ≡ 8, # of Trials: 4000, with γ ≡ 15
7.5
14
16
18
20
18
20
R ≡ 8, # of Trials: 4000, γ ≡ 15
7
Random Failures iff t ∈ [12, 15]
Random Failures iff t ∈ [5, 6]
7
6.5
Expected SINR (dB)
Expected SINR (dB)
4
Time Slot (t)
6.5
Strategic: 0 failures
Strategic: 1 failures
Strategic: 3 failures
Strategic: 5 failures
Agnostic (0 failures)
6
5.5
5
6
5.5
Strategic: 0 failures
Strategic: 1 failures
Strategic: 3 failures
Strategic: 5 failures
Agnostic (0 failures)
5
4.5
4.5
4
4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time Slot (t)
Time Slot (t)
(c)
(d)
14
16
Figure 5.2: Performance of the proposed spatially controlled system, at the presence of motion
failures.
probability), the relays, at time t − 1, are predictively steered to locations, which, most probably,
incur higher network QoS. As clearly shown in Fig. 5.1, for all systems under study, including
that implementing the oracle policy, an increase in system performance also implies a proportional
increase in the respective standard deviation.
Next, we experimentally evaluate the performance of the system at the presence of random
motion failures in the network. Hereafter, we work with the 2nd order heuristic (4.36), and set
T ≡ 20. Random motion failures are modeled by choosing, at each trial, a random sample of a fixed
number of relays and a random time when the failures occur, that is, at each time, the selected
relays just stop moving; they continue to beamform staying still, at the position each of them visited
last. Two cases are considered; in the first case, motion failures happen if and only if t ∈ [12, 15]
(Figs. 5.2a and 5.2c), whereas, in the second case, t ∈ [5, 6] (Figs. 5.2b and 5.2d). In both cases,
35
zero, one, three and five relays (chosen at random, at each trial) stop moving. Two cases for γ are
considered, γ ≡ 5 (Figs. 5.2a and 5.2b) and γ ≡ 15 (Figs. 5.2c and 5.2d).
Again, the results presented in Fig. 5.2 pleasingly confirm our predictions implied by Theorem
6 (note, however, that Theorem 6 does not support randomized motion failures; on the other hand,
our simulations are such in order to stress test the proposed system in more adverse motion failure
cases). In particular, Fig. 5.2a clearly demonstrates that a larger number of motion failures induces
a proportional, relatively (depending on γ) slight decrease in performance; this decrease, though,
is smoothly evolving, and is not abrupt. This behavior is more pronounced in Fig. 5.2c, where the
correlation time parameter γ has been increased to 15 (recall that, in Theorem 6, γ is assumed to
be sufficiently large). We readily observe that, in this case, over the same horizon, the operation of
the system is smoother, and decrease in performance, as well as its slope, are significantly smaller
than those in Fig. 5.2a, for all cases of motion failures. Now, in Figs. 5.2b and 5.2d, when motion
failures happen early, well before the network QoS converges to its maximal value, we observe
that, although some relays might stop moving at some point, the achieved expected network QoS
continues exhibiting its usual increasing trend. Of course, the performance of the system converges
values strictly proportional to the number of failures in each of the cases considered. This means
that the relays which continue moving contribute positively to increasing network QoS. This has
been indeed predicted by Theorem 6, as well.
6
Conclusions
We have considered the problem of enhancing QoS in time slotted relay beamforming networks
with one source/destination, via stochastic relay motion control. Modeling the wireless channel as
a spatiotemporal stochastic field, we proposed a novel 2-stage stochastic programming formulation
for predictively specifying relay positions, such that the future expected network QoS is maximized,
based on causal CSI and under a total relay power constraint. We have shown that this problem
can be effectively approximated by a set of simple, two dimensional subproblems, which can be
distributively solved, one at each relay. System optimality was tediously analyzed under a rigorous
mathematical framework, and our analysis resulted in the development of an extended version of the
Fundamental Lemma of Stochastic Control, which constitutes a result of independent interest, as
well. We have additionally provided strong theoretical guarantees, characterizing the performance
of the proposed system, and showing that the average QoS achieved improves over time. Our
simulations confirmed the success of the proposed approach, which results in relay motion control
policies yielding significant performance improvement, when compared to agnostic, randomized
relay motion.
7
Acknowledgments
Dionysios Kalogerias would like to kindly thank Dr. Nikolaos Chatzipanagiotis for very fruitful
discussions in the very early stages of the development of this work, and Ioannis Manousakis and
Ioannis Paraskevakos for their very useful comments and suggestions, especially concerning practical
applicability, implementation of the proposed methods, as well as simulation issues.
36
8
Appendices
8.1
8.1.1
Appendix A: Proofs / Section 3
Proof of Lemma 1
In the following, we will rely on an incremental construction of Σ. Initially, consider the matrix
e
e (1, 2) . . . Σ
e (1, NT )
Σ (1, 1)
Σ
Σ
e (2, 1)
e (2, 2) . . . Σ
e (2, NT )
Σ
RN
e ,
Σ
(8.1)
∈ S T,
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
e (NT , 1) Σ
e (NT , 2) · · · Σ
e (NT , NT )
Σ
+
R
e
where, for each combination (k, l) ∈ N+
NT × NNT , Σ (k, l) ∈ S , with
e (k, l) (i, j) , Σ
e pi (k) , pj (l)
Σ
pi (k) − pj (l)
, η exp −
β
2
2
!
,
(8.2)
+
e
for all (i, j) ∈ N+
R × NR . By construction, Σ is positive semidefinite, because the well known
2
2
e
exponential kernel Σ : R × R → R++ defined above is positive (semi)definite.
Next, define the positive definite matrix
1 κ
, with
(8.3)
K,
κ 1
kpS − pD k2
κ , exp −
<1
(8.4)
δ
e
and consider the Tracy-Singh type of product of K and Σ
e (1, 1)
e (1, 2) . . . K 4 Σ
e (1, NT )
K4Σ
K4Σ
K4Σ
e (2, 1)
e (2, 2) . . . K 4 Σ
e (2, NT )
K4Σ
2RNT
eK , K ◦ Σ
e ,
Σ
,
∈S
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e (NT , 1) K 4 Σ
e (NT , 2) · · · K 4 Σ
e (NT , NT )
K4Σ
(8.5)
+
where “4” denotes the operator of the Kronecker product. Then, for each (k, l) ∈ N+
NT × NNT , we
have
"
#
e (k, l) κΣ
e (k, l)
Σ
2R
e (k, l) ≡
K4Σ
(8.6)
e (k, l) Σ
e (k, l) ∈ S .
κΣ
e K is positive semidefinite, that is, in S2RNT . First, via a simple inductive
It is easy to show that Σ
+
argument, it can be shown that, for compatible matrices A, B, C, D,
(AB) ◦ (CD) ≡ (A ◦ C) (B ◦ D) .
(8.7)
e are symmetric,
Also, for compatible A, B, it is true that (A ◦ B)T ≡ AT ◦ BT . Since K and Σ
T
T
e ≡ U e Λ e U e . Given the identities
consider their spectral decompositions K ≡ UK ΛK UK and Σ
Σ Σ Σ
stated above, we may write
eK ≡ K ◦ Σ
e ≡ UK ΛK UTK ◦ U e Λ e UTe
Σ
Σ Σ Σ
37
UTK ◦ UTΣ
e
T
≡ UK ◦ UΣ
ΛK ◦ ΛΣ
UK ◦ UΣ
,
(8.8)
e
e
e
T
T
T
where UK ◦ UΣ
UK ◦ UTΣ
≡
U
U
◦
U
U
e
e
e
e ≡ I2 ◦IRNT ≡ I2RNT , and where the matrix
K K
Σ Σ
ΛK ◦ΛΣ
e is easily shown to be diagonal and with nonnegative elements. Thus, since (8.8) constitutes
e K , it follows that Σ
e K ∈ S2RNT .
a valid spectral decomposition for Σ
+
As a last step, let E ∈ SNT , such that
|k − l|
,
(8.9)
E (k, l) , exp −
γ
≡ UK ◦ UΣ
e
ΛK ◦ ΛΣ
e
+
for all (k, l) ∈ N+
NT × NNT . Again, E is positive semidefinite, because the well known Laplacian
kernel is positive (semi)definite. Consider the matrix
e E , (E 4 12R×2R )
Σ
e K ∈ S2RNT ,
Σ
(8.10)
where “ ” denotes the operator of the Schur-Hadamard product. Of course, since the matrix 12R×2R
is rank-1 and positive semidefinite, E 4 12R×2R will be positive semidefinite as well. Consequently,
e E will also be positive semidefinite. Finally, observe that
by the Schur Product Theorem, Σ
2RN
e E + σξ2 I2RN ,
Σ≡Σ
T
from where it follows that Σ ∈ S++ T , whenever σξ2 6= 0. Our claims follow.
8.1.2
(8.11)
Proof of Theorem 2
Obviously, the vector process X (t) is Gaussian with mean zero. This is straightforward to show.
Therefore, what remains is, simply, to verify that the covariance structure of X (t) is the same as
that of C (t), that is, we need to show that
n
o
n
o
E X (s) X T (t) ≡ E C (s) C T (t) ,
(8.12)
+
for all (s, t) ∈ N+
NT × NNT .
First, consider the case where s ≡ t. Then, we have
n
o
n
o
E X (s) X T (t) ≡ E X (t) X T (t)
n
o
e C.
= ϕ2 E X (t − 1) X T (t − 1) + 1 − ϕ2 Σ
Observe, though, that, similarly to the scalar order-1 autoregressive model, the quantity
n
o
e C ≡ E X (0) X T (0)
Σ
(8.13)
(8.14)
n
o
is a fixed point of the previously stated recursion for E X (t) X T (t) . Therefore, it is true that
n
o
n
o
e C ≡ ΣC (0) ≡ E C (t) C T (t) ,
E X (t) X T (t) ≡ Σ
38
(8.15)
which the desired result.
Now, consider the case where s < t. Then, it may be easily shown that
n
o
n
o
n
o
E X (s) X T (t) ≡ ϕ2 E X (s − 1) X T (t − 1) + ϕE W (s) X T (t − 1) .
(8.16)
Let us consider the second term on the RHS of (8.16). Expanding the recursion, we may write
n
o
n
o
ϕE W (s) X T (t − 1) ≡ ϕE W (s) ϕX T (t − 2) + W T (t − 1)
n
o
≡ ϕ2 E W (s) X T (t − 2)
..
.
n
o
≡ ϕt−s E W (s) W T (s)
e C.
≡ ϕt−s 1 − ϕ2 Σ
(8.17)
We observe that this term depends only on the lag t − s. Thus, it is true that
n
o
n
o
eC
E X (s) X T (t) ≡ ϕ2 E X (s − 1) X T (t − 1) + ϕt−s 1 − ϕ2 Σ
n
o
e C 1 + ϕ2
= ϕ2·2 E X (s − 2) X T (t − 2) + ϕt−s 1 − ϕ2 Σ
..
.
n
o
X 2 s−1
T
t−s
2 e
≡ ϕ E X (0) X (t − s) + ϕ
1 − ϕ ΣC
ϕ
2s
i∈Ns−1
n
o
e C.
= ϕ2s E X (0) X T (t − s) + ϕt−s 1 − ϕ2s Σ
n
o
Further, we may expand E X (0) X T (t − s) in similar fashion as above, to get that
n
o
e C.
E X (0) X T (t − s) ≡ ϕt−s Σ
(8.18)
(8.19)
Exactly the same arguments may be made for the symmetric case where t < s. Therefore, it follows
that
n
o
eC
E X (s) X T (t) ≡ ϕ|t−s| Σ
|t − s| e
≡ exp −
ΣC
γ
≡ ΣC (t − s)
(8.20)
+
for all (s, t) ∈ N+
NT × NNT , and we are done.
8.2
Appendix B: Measurability & The Fundamental Lemma of Stochastic Control
In the following, aligned with the purposes of this paper, a detailed discussion is presented, which is
related to important technical issues, arising towards the analysis and simplification of variational
problems of the form of (4.5).
39
At this point, it would be necessary to introduce some important concepts. Let us first introduce
the useful class of Carathéodory functions [26, 44]2 .
Definition 3. (Carathéodory Function [26, 44]) On (Ω, F ), the mapping H : Ω × RN → R is
called Carathéodory, if and only if H (·, x) is F -measurable for all x ∈ RN and H (ω, ·) is continuous
for all ω ∈ Ω.
Remark 8. As the reader might have already observed, Carathéodory functions and random fields
with (everywhere) continuous sample paths are essentially the same thing. Nevertheless, the term
“Carathéodory function” is extensively used in our references [25, 26, 44]. This is the main reason
why we still define and use the term.
In the analysis that follows, we will exploit the notion of measurability for closed-valued multifunctions.
Definition 4. (Measurable Multifunctions [25,26]) On the measurable space (Ω, F ), a closedvalued multifunction X : Ω ⇒ RN is F -measurable if and only if, for all closed A ⊆ RN , the
preimage
n
o
\
X −1 (A) , ω ∈ Ω X (ω) A =
6 ∅
(8.21)
is in F . If F constitutes a Borel σ-algebra, generated by a topology on Ω, then an F -measurable
X will be equivalently called Borel measurable.
We will also make use of the concept of a closed multifunction (Remark 28 in [26], p. 365),
whose definition is also presented below, restricted to the case of Euclidean spaces, of interest in
this work.
Definition 5. (Closed Multifunction [26]) A closed-valued multifunction X : RM ⇒ RN (a
function from RM to closed sets in RN ) is closed if and only if, for all sequences {xk }k∈N and
{y k }k∈N , such that xk −→ x, y k −→ y and xk ∈ X (y k ), for all k ∈ N, it is true that x ∈ X (y).
k→∞
8.2.1
k→∞
Random Functions & The Substitution Rule for Conditional Expectations
Given a random function g (ω, x), a sub σ-algebra Y , another Y -measurable random element X,
and as long as E { g (·, x)| Y } exists for all x in the range of X, we would also need to make extensive
use of the substitution rule
E { g (·, X)| Y } (ω) ≡ E { g (·, X (ω))| Y } (ω)
≡ E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω)|x≡X(ω) ,
P − a.e.,
(8.22)
which would allow us to evaluate conditional expectations, by essentially fixing the quantities that
are constant relative to the information we are conditioning on, carry out the evaluation, and then
let those quantities vary in ω again. Although the substitution rule is a concept readily taken
for granted when conditional expectations of Borel measurable functions of random elements (say,
from products of Euclidean spaces to R) are considered, it does not hold, in general, for arbitrary
random functions. As far as our general formulation is concerned, it is necessary to consider random
2
Instead of working with the class of Carathéodory functions, we could also consider the more general class of
random lower semicontinuous functions [26], which includes the former. However, this might lead to overgeneralization
and, thus, we prefer not to do so; the class of Carathéodory functions will be perfectly sufficient for our purposes.
40
functions, whose domain is a product of a well behaved space (such as RN ) and the sample space,
Ω, whose structure is assumed to be and should be arbitrary, at least in regard to the applications
of interest in this work.
One common way to ascertain the validity of the substitution rule is by exploiting the representation of conditional expectations via integrals with respect to the relevant regular conditional
distributions, whenever the latter exist. But because of the arbitrary structure of the base space
(Ω, F , P), regular conditional distributions defined on points in the sample space Ω cannot be guaranteed to exist and, therefore, the substitution rule may fail to hold. However, as we will see, the
substitution rule will be very important for establishing the Fundamental Lemma. Therefore, we
may choose to impose it as a property on the structures of g and/or X instead, as well as establish
sufficient conditions for this property to hold. The relevant definition follows.
Definition 6. (Substitution Property (SP )) On (Ω, F , P), consider a random element Y :
Ω → RM , the associated sub σ-algebra Y , σ {Y } ⊆ F , and a random function g : Ω × RN → R,
such that E {g (·, x)} exists for all x ∈ RN . Let CY be any functional class, such that3
)
(
−1
(A) ∈ Y , for all A ∈ B RN
N X
CY ⊆ IY , X : Ω → R
.
(8.23)
E {g (·, X)} exists
We say that g possesses the Substitution Property within CY , or, equivalently, that g is SP ♦CY , if
and only if there exists a jointly Borel measurable function h : RM × RN → R, with h (Y (ω) , x) ≡
E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω), everywhere in (ω, x) ∈ Ω × RN , such that, for any X ∈ CY , it is true that
E { g (·, X)| Y } (ω) ≡ h (Y (ω) , X (ω)) ,
(8.24)
almost everywhere in ω ∈ Ω with respect to P.
Remark 9. Observe that, in Definition 6, h is required to be the same for all X ∈ CY . That is, h
should be determined only by the structure of g, relative to Y , regardless of the specific X within
CY , considered each time. On the other hand, it is also important to note that the set of unity
measure, where (8.24) is valid, might indeed be dependent on the particular X.
Remark 10. Another detail of Definition 6 is that, because E {g (·, x)} is assumed to exist for all
x ∈ RN , E { g (·, x)| Y } also exists and, as an extended Y -measurable random variable, for every
x ∈ RN , there exists a Borel measurable function hx : RM → R, such that
hx (Y (ω)) ≡ E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω) ,
∀ω ∈ Ω.
(8.25)
One may then readily define a function h : RM ×RN → R, such that h (Y (ω), x)≡E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω),
uniformly for all points, ω, of the sample space, Ω. This is an extremely important fact, in
regard to the analysis that follows. Observe, however, that, in general, h will be Borel measurable
only in its first argument; h is not guaranteed to be measurable in x ∈ RN , for each Y ∈ RM , let
alone jointly measurable in both its arguments.
Remark 11. (Generalized SP ) Definition 6 may be reformulated in a more general setting. In
particular, Y may be assumed to be any arbitrary sub σ-algebra of F , but with the subtle difference
that, in such case, one would instead directly demand that the random function h : Ω×RN → R, with
3
Hereafter, statements of type “E {g (·, X)} exists” will implicitly imply that g (·, X) is an F -measurable function.
41
h (ω, x) ≡ E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω), everywhere in (ω, x) ∈ Ω × RN , is jointly Y ⊗ B RN -measurable
and such that, for any X ∈ CY (with CY defined accordingly), it is true that
E { g (·, X)| Y } (ω) ≡ h (ω, X (ω)) ,
P − a.e..
(8.26)
Although such a generalized definition of the substitution property is certainly less enlightening,
it is still useful. Specifically, this version of SP is explicitly used in the statement and proof of
Theorem 6, presented in Section 4.4.
Keeping (Ω, F , P) of arbitrary structure, we will be interested in the set of g’s which are
SP ♦IY . The next result provides a large class of such random functions, which is sufficient
for our purposes.
Theorem 8. (Sufficient Conditions for the SP ♦IY ) On (Ω, F , P), consider a random element
Y : Ω → RM , the associated sub σ-algebra Y , σ {Y } ⊆ F , and a random function g : Ω×RN → R.
Suppose that:
• g is dominated by a P-integrable function; that is,
∃ψ ∈ L1 (Ω, F , P; R) , such that sup |g (ω, x)| ≤ ψ (ω) ,
N
x∈R
∀ω ∈ Ω,
(8.27)
• g is Carathéodory on Ω × RN , and that
• the extended real valued function E { g (·, x)| Y } is Carathéodory on Ω × RN .
Then, g is SP ♦IY .
Proof of Theorem 8. Under the setting of the theorem, consider any Y -measurable random element
X : Ω → RN , for which E {g (·, X)} exists. Then, E { g (·, X)| Y } exists. Also, by domination of g
by ψ, for all x ∈ RN , E { g (·, x)| Y } exists and constitutes a P-integrable, Y -measurable random
variable. By Remark 10, we know that
E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω) ≡ h (Y (ω) , x) ,
∀ (ω, x) ∈ Ω × RN ,
(8.28)
where h : RM ×RN → R is Borel measurable in its first argument. However, since E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω)
N
M
N
≡ h (Y (ω) , x) is Carathéodory
on Ω × R , h is Carathéodory on R × R , as well. Thus, h will
be jointly B RM ⊗ B RN -measurable (Lemma 4.51 in [44], along with the fact that R is
metrizable).
We claim that, actually, h is such that
E { g (·, X)| Y } ≡ h (Y, X) ,
P − a.e..
(8.29)
Employing a common technique, the result will be proven in steps, starting from indicators and
building up to arbitrary measurable functions, as far as X is concerned. Before embarking with
the core of the proof, note that, for any x1 and x2 in RN and any A ∈ F , the sum g (·, x1 ) 1A +
g (·, x2 ) 1Ac is always well defined, and E {g (·, x1 ) 1A } and E {g (·, x2 ) 1Ac } both exist and are finite
by domination. This implies that E {g (·, x1 ) 1A } + E {g (·, x2 ) 1Ac } is always well-defined, which in
turn implies the validity of the additivity properties (Theorem 1.6.3 and Theorem 5.5.2 in [45])
E {g (·, x1 ) 1A + g (·, x2 ) 1Ac } ≡ E {g (·, x1 ) 1A } + E {g (·, x2 ) 1Ac } ∈ R,
42
and
(8.30)
E { g (·, x1 ) 1A + g (·, x2 ) 1Ac | Y } ≡ E { g (·, x1 ) 1A | Y } + E { g (·, x2 ) 1Ac | Y } , P − a.e..
(8.31)
Hence, under our setting, any such manipulation is technically justified.
e 1A (ω), for some x
e ∈ RN and some A ∈ Y . Then, by ([45],
Suppose first that X (ω) ≡ x
Theorem 5.5.11 & Comment 5.5.12), it is true that
e ) 1A + g (·, 0) 1Ac | Y }
E { g (·, X)| Y } ≡ E { g (·, x
e ) 1A | Y } + E { g (·, 0) 1Ac | Y }
≡ E { g (·, x
e )| Y } + 1Ac E { g (·, 0)| Y }
≡ 1A E { g (·, x
e ) + 1Ac h (Y, 0)
≡ 1A h (Y, x
e 1A )
≡ h (Y, x
≡ h (Y, X) ,
P − a.e.,
(8.32)
e i 1Ai (ω) ,
x
(8.33)
proving the claim for indicators.
Consider now simple functions of the form
X (ω) ≡
X
+
i∈NI
T
S
e i ∈ RN , Ai ∈ Y , for all i ∈ N+
where x
Aj ≡ ∅, for i 6= j and i∈N+ Ai ≡ Ω. Then, we
I , with Ai
I
again have
X
e i ) 1Ai Y
E { g (·, X)| Y } ≡ E
g (·, x
+
i∈NI
X
e i ) 1Ai Y
≡
E g (·, x
+
i∈NI
≡
≡
X
+
i∈NI
X
+
i∈NI
e i )| Y }
1Ai E { g (·, x
ei)
1Ai h (Y, x
X
e i 1Ai
≡ h Y,
x
+
i∈NI
≡ h (Y, X) ,
P − a.e.,
(8.34)
and the proved is claimed for simple functions.
To show that our claims are true for any arbitrary random function g, we take advantage of
the continuity of both h and gnin x. First,
o we know that h is Carathéodory, which means that, for
N
every ω ∈ Ω, if any sequence xn ∈ R
is such that xn −→ x (for arbitrary x ∈ RN ), it is
true that
n→∞
n∈N
h (Y (ω) , xn ) ≡ E { g (·, xn )| Y } (ω) −→ E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω) ≡ h (Y (ω) , x) .
n→∞
43
(8.35)
Second, weoknow that g is Carathéodory as well, also implying that, for every ω ∈ Ω, if any sequence
n
is such that xn −→ x, it is true that
xn ∈ RN
n→∞
n∈N
n
o
Next, let Xn : Ω → RN
g (ω, xn ) −→ g (ω, x) .
(8.36)
n→∞
n∈N
be a sequence of simple Borel functions, such that, for all ω ∈ Ω,
Xn (ω) −→ X (ω) .
(8.37)
n→∞
Note that such a sequence always exists (see
1.5.5 (b) in [45]). Consequently, for each
Theorem
N
ω ∈ Ω, we may write (note that g is F ⊗ B R -measurable; see ([44], Lemma 4.51))
g (ω, Xn (ω)) −→ g (ω, X (ω)) ,
(8.38)
n→∞
that is, the sequence {g (·, Xn )}n∈N converges to g (·, X), everywhere in Ω.
Now, let us try to apply the Dominated Convergence Theorem for conditional expectations
(Theorem 5.5.5 in [45]) to the aforementioned sequence of functions. Of course, we have to show
that all members of the sequence {g (·, Xn )}n∈N are dominated by another integrable function,
uniformly in n ∈ N. By assumption, there exists an integrable function ψ : Ω → R, such that
∀ (ω, x) ∈ Ω × RN .
|g (ω, x)| ≤ ψ (ω) ,
(8.39)
In particular, it must also be true that
|g (ω, Xn (ω))| ≤ ψ (ω) ,
∀ (ω, n) ∈ Ω × N,
(8.40)
verifying the domination requirement.
Thus, Dominated Convergence implies the existence of an
event ΩΠ1 ⊆ Ω, with P ΩΠ1 ≡ 1, such that, for all ω ∈ ΩΠ1 ,
E { g (·, Xn )| Y } (ω) −→ E { g (·, X)| Y } (ω) .
n→∞
Also, for every ω ∈ Ω
T
(8.41)
ΩΠ1 ≡ ΩΠ1 , (8.35) yields
h (Y (ω) , Xn (ω)) −→ h (Y (ω) , X (ω)) .
(8.42)
n→∞
However, by what we have shown above, because the sequence {Xn }n∈N consists of simple functions,
then, for every n ∈ N, there exists ΩΠn ⊆ Ω, with P (ΩΠn ) ≡ 1, such that, for all ω ∈ ΩΠn ,
E { g (·, Xn )| Y } (ω) ≡ h (Y (ω) , Xn (ω)) .
(8.43)
Since N is countable, there exists a “global” event ΩΠ2 ⊆ Ω, with P ΩΠ2 ≡ 1, such that, for all
ω ∈ ΩΠ2 ,
E { g (·, Xn )| Y } (ω) ≡ h (Y (ω) , Xn (ω)) , ∀n ∈ N.
(8.44)
T
Now define the event ΩΠ3 , ΩΠ1 ΩΠ2 . Of course, P ΩΠ3 ≡ 1. Then, for every ω ∈ ΩΠ3 , (8.41),
(8.42) and (8.44) all hold simultaneously. Therefore, for every ω ∈ ΩΠ3 , it is true that (say)
h (Y (ω) , Xn (ω)) −→ E { g (·, X)| Y } (ω)
n→∞
44
and
(8.45)
h (Y (ω) , Xn (ω)) −→ h (Y (ω) , X (ω)) ,
(8.46)
n→∞
which immediately yields
E { g (·, X)| Y } (ω) ≡ h (Y (ω) , X (ω)) ,
P − a.e.,
(8.47)
showing that g is SP ♦IY .
Remark 12. We would like to note that the assumptions of Theorem 8 can be significantly weakened,
guaranteeing the validity of the substitution rule for vastly discontinuous random functions, including, for instance, cases with random discontinuities, or random jumps. This extended analysis,
though, is out of the scope of the paper and will be presented elsewhere.
8.2.2
A Base Form of the Lemma
We will first state a base, very versatile version of the Fundamental Lemma, treating a general class
of problems, which includes the particular stochastic problem of interest, (4.5), as a subcase.
Lemma 3. (Fundamental Lemma / Base Version) On (Ω, F , P), consider a random element
Y : Ω → RM , the sub σ-algebra Y , σ {Y } ⊆ F , a random function g : Ω × RN → R, such
that E {g (·, x)} exists for all x ∈ RN , a Borel measurable closed-valued multifunction X : RN ⇒
RN , with dom (X ) ≡ RN , as well as another Y -measurable random element ZY : Ω → RN , with
ZY (ω) ≡ Z (Y (ω)), for all ω ∈ Ω, for some Borel Z : RM → RN . Consider also the decision set
)
(
X (ω) ∈ X (ZY (ω)) , a.e. in ω
∈ Ω
Y
N
FX (ZY ) , X : Ω → R
,
(8.48)
X −1 (A) ∈ Y , for all A ∈ B RN
containing all Y -measurable selections of X (ZY ). Then, FXY (ZY ) is nonempty. Suppose that:
• E {g (·, X)} exists for all X ∈ FXY (ZY ) , with inf X∈F Y
X (ZY
)
E {g (·, X)} < +∞, and that
• g is SP ♦FXY (ZY ) .
Then, if Y denotes the completion of Y relative to the restriction P|Y , then the optimal value
function inf x∈X (ZY ) E { g (·, x)| Y } , ϑ is Y -measurable and it is true that
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
E {g (·, X)} ≡ E
inf
x∈X (ZY )
E { g (·, x)| Y }
≡ E {ϑ} .
(8.49)
In other words, variational minimization over FXY (ZY ) is exchangeable by pointwise (over constants)
minimization over the random multifunction X (ZY ), relative to Y .
Remark 13. Note that, in the statement of Lemma 3, assuming that the infimum of E {g (·, X)}
over FXY (ZY ) is less than +∞ is equivalent to assuming the existence of an X in FXY (ZY ) , such that
E {g (·, X)} is less than +∞.
Before embarking with the proof of Lemma 3, it would be necessary to state an old, fundamental
selection theorem, due to Mackey [46].
45
Theorem 9. (Borel Measurable Selections [46]) Let (S1 , B (S1 )) and (S2 , B (S2 )) be Borel
spaces and let (S2 , B (S2 )) be standard. Let µ : B (S1 ) → [0, ∞] be a standard measure on
(S1 , B (S1 )).
Suppose that A ∈ B (S1 ) ⊗ B (S2 ), such that, for each y ∈ S1 , there exists xy ∈ S2 , so
that y, xy ∈ A. Then, there exists a Borel subset O ∈ B (S1 ) with µ (O) ≡ 0, as well as a Borel
measurable function φ : S1 → S2 , such that (y, φ (y)) ∈ A, for all y ∈ S1 \ O.
Remark 14. Theorem 9 refers to the concepts of a Borel space, a standard Borel space and a standard
measure. These are employed as structural assumptions, in order for the conclusions of the theorem
to hold true. In this paper, except for the base probability space (Ω, F , P), whose structure may
be arbitrary, all other spaces and measures considered will satisfy those assumptions by default.
We thus choose not to present the respective definitions; instead, the interested reader is referred
to the original article, [46].
We are now ready to prove Lemma 3, as follows.
Proof of Lemma 3. As usual with such results, the proof will rely on showing a double sided inequality [23–25, 27, 28, 47]. There is one major difficulty, though, in the optimization setting considered,
because all infima may be potentially unattainable, within the respective decision sets. However, it
is immediately evident that, because g is assumed to be SP ♦FXY (ZY ) , and via a simple application
of the tower property, it will suffice to show that
inf
E {h (Y, X)} ≡ E
inf h (Y, x) .
(8.50)
Y
x∈X (ZY )
X∈FX (Z )
Y
This is because it is true that, for any Y -measurable selection of X (ZY ), say X : Ω → RN , for
which E {g (·, X)} exists,
E { g (·, X)| Y } (ω) ≡ h (Y (ω) , x)|x=X(ω) ,
∀ω ∈ ΩΠX ,
where the event ΩΠX ∈ F is such that P ΩΠX ≡ 1 and h is jointly Borel, satisfying
E { g (·, x)| Y } ≡ h (Y (ω) , x) ,
(8.51)
(8.52)
everywhere in (ω, x) ∈ Ω × RN .
For the sake of clarity in the exposition, we will break the proof into a number of discrete
subsections, providing a tractable roadmap to the final result.
Step 1. FXY (ZY ) is nonempty.
It suffices to show that there exists at least one Y -measurable selection of X (ZY ), that is, a
Y -measurable random variable, say X : Ω → RN , such that X (ω) ∈ X (ZY (ω)), for all ω in the
domain of X (ZY ).
We first show that the composite multifunction X (ZY (·)) : Ω ⇒ RN is Y -measurable. Recall
from Definition 4 that it suffices to show that
n
o
\
X ZY−1 (A) , ω ∈ Ω X (ZY (ω)) A =
6 ∅ ∈Y,
(8.53)
for every closed A ⊆ RN
. Since the closed-valued multifunction X is Borel measurable, it is true
−1
N
that X (A) ∈ B R , for all closed A ⊆ RN . We also know that ZY is Y -measurable, or that
46
ZY−1 (B) ∈ Y , for all B ∈ B RN . Setting B ≡ X −1 (A) ∈ B RN , for any arbitrary closed
A ⊆ RN , it is true that
n
o
Y 3 ZY−1 X −1 (A) ≡ ω ∈ Ω ZY (ω) ∈ X −1 (A)
n
o
\
≡ ω ∈ Ω X (ZY (ω)) A =
6 ∅
≡ X ZY−1 (A) ,
(8.54)
and, thus, the composition X (ZY (·)) is Y -measurable, or, in other words, measurable on the
measurable (sub)space (Ω, Y ).
Now, since the closed-valued multifunction X (ZY ) is measurable on (Ω, Y ), it admits a Castaing
Representation (Theorem 14.5 in [25] & Theorem 7.34 in [26]). Therefore, there exists at least one
Y -measurable selection of X (ZY ), which means that FXY (ZY ) contains at least one element.
F
Step 2. ϑ is Y -measurable.
To show the validity of this statement, we first demonstrate that, for any chosen h : RM × RN →
R, as in Definition 6, the function ξ : RM → R, defined as
ξ (y) ,
inf
x∈X (Z(y))
h (y, x) ,
∀y ∈ RM ,
(8.55)
is measurable relative to B RM , the completion of B RM relative to the pushforward PY . This
follows easily from the following
facts.
First,
the
graph of the measurable multifunction X (Z (·))
M
N
is itself measurable and in B R
⊗B R
(Theorem 14.8 in [25]), and, therefore, analytic
(Appendix A.2 in [27]). Second, h is jointly Borel measurable and, therefore, a lower semianalytic
function (Appendix A.2 in [27]). As a result, ([28], Proposition 7.47) implies that ξ is also lower
semianalytic, and, consequently, universally measurable
(Appendix A.2 in [27]). Being universally
M
measurable, ξ is also measurable relative to B R , thus proving our claim. We also rely on the
definitions of both Y and B RM , stated as (Theorem 1.9 in [48])
[
B ∈ Y ⇐⇒ B ≡ C
D C ∈ Y and D ⊆ O ∈ Y , with P|Y (O) ≡ 0 and
(8.56)
[
B ∈ B RM ⇐⇒ B ≡ C
D C ∈ B RM and D ⊆ O ∈ B RM , with PY (O) ≡ 0. (8.57)
Now, specifically,
to show that ϑ is measurable relative to Y , it suffices to show that, for every
Borel A ∈ B R ,
ϑ−1 (A) , { ω ∈ Ω| ϑ (ω) ∈ A} ∈ Y .
(8.58)
Recall, that,
by definition of ξ, it is true that ξ (Y (ω)) ≡ ϑ (ω), for all ω ∈ Ω. Then, for every
A ∈ B R , we may write
ϑ−1 (A) ≡ ξY −1 (A)
≡ { ω ∈ Ω| ξ (Y (ω)) ∈ A}
n
o
≡ ω ∈ Ω| Y (ω) ∈ ξ −1 (A)
47
, Y −1 ξ −1 (A) .
(8.59)
S
But ξ −1 (A) ∈ B RM , which, by (8.57), equivalently means that ξ −1 (A) ≡ GA HA , for some
GA ∈ B RM and some HA ⊆ EA ∈ B RM , with PY (EA ) ≡ 0. Thus, we may further express
any A-preimage of ϑ as
[
ϑ−1 (A) ≡ Y −1 GA HA
[
≡ Y −1 (GA ) Y −1 (HA ) .
(8.60)
Now, because GA is Borel and Y is a random element, it is true that Y −1 (GA ) ∈ Y . On the other
hand, HA ⊆ EA , which implies that Y −1 (HA ) ⊆ Y −1 (EA ), where
P|Y Y −1 (EA ) ≡ PY (EA ) ≡ 0.
(8.61)
Therefore, we have shown that, for every A ∈ B R , ϑ−1 (A) may always be written as a union of
an element in Y and some subset of a P|Y -null set, also in Y . Enough said.
F
Step 3. For every X ∈ FXY (ZY ) , it is true that h (Y, X) ≥ inf x∈X (ZY ) h (Y, x) ≡ ϑ.
For each ω ∈ Ω (which also determines Y ), we may write
ϑ (ω) ≡
≡
inf
x∈X (Z(Y (ω)))
h (Y (ω) , x)
inf
M(Y (ω))∈X (ZY (ω))
h (Y (ω) , M (Y (ω))) ,
(8.62)
where M : RM → RN is of arbitrary nature. Therefore, ϑ may be equivalently regarded as the
result of infimizing h over the set of all, measurable or not, functionals of Y , which are also selections
of X (ZY ). This set, of course, includes FXY (ZY ) . Now, choose an X ≡ MX (Y ) ∈ FXY (ZY ) , as above,
for some Borel measurable MX : RM → RN . Then, it must be true that
ϑ (ω) ≤ h (Y (ω) , MX (Y (ω))) ≡ h (Y (ω) , X (ω)) ,
everywhere in ω ∈ Ω.
(8.63)
F
Step 4. It is also true that
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
E {h (Y, X)} ≥ E
inf
x∈X (ZY )
h (Y, x) .
(8.64)
From Step 3, we know that, for every X ∈ FXY (ZY ) , we have
h (Y, X) ≥ ϑ.
(8.65)
At this point, we exploit measurability of ϑ, proved in Step 2. Since, by assumption,
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
E {h (Y, X)} ≡
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
48
E {g (·, X)} < +∞,
(8.66)
it follows that there exists XF ∈ FXY (ZY ) , such that E {h (Y, XF )} < +∞ (recall that the integral
E {g (·, XF )} exists anyway, also by assumption). Since (8.65) holds for every X ∈ FXY (ZY ) , it also
holds for XF ∈ FXY (ZY ) and, consequently, the integral of ϑ exists, with E {ϑ} < +∞. Then, we
may take expectations on both sides of (8.65) (Theorem 1.5.9 (b) in [45]), yielding
E {h (Y, X)} ≥ E {ϑ} ,
∀X ∈ FXY (ZY ) .
(8.67)
Infimizing additionally both sides over X ∈ FXY (ZY ) , we obtain the desired inequality.
We may also observe that, if inf X∈F Y
E {h (Y, X)} ≡ −∞, then
X (ZY
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
)
E {h (Y, X)} ≡ E {ϑ} ≡ −∞,
(8.68)
and the conclusion of Lemma 3 holds immediately. Therefore, in the following, we may assume that
inf X∈F Y
E {h (Y, X)} > −∞.
F
X (ZY
)
Step 5. For every ε > 0, n ∈ N and every y ∈ RM , there exists x ≡ xy ∈ X (Z (y)), such that
h y, xy ≤ max {ξ (y) , −n} + ε.
(8.69)
This simple fact may be shown by contradiction; replacing the universal with existential quantifiers and vice versa in the above statement, suppose that there exists ε > 0 , n ∈ N, and y ∈ RM such
that, for all x ∈ X (Z (y)), h (y, x) > max {ξ (y) , −n} + ε. There are two cases: 1) ξ (y) > −∞.
In this case, max {ξ (y) , −n} ≥ ξ (y), which would imply that, for all x ∈ X (Z (y)),
h (y, x) > ξ (y) + ε,
(8.70)
contradicting the fact that ξ (y) is the infimum (the greatest lower bound) of h (y, x) over X (Z (y)),
since ε > 0. 2) ξ (y) ≡ −∞. Here, max {ξ (y) , −n} ≡ −n, and, for all x ∈ XZ (y), we would write
h (y, x) > −n + ε ∈ R,
(8.71)
which, again, contradicts the fact that −∞ ≡ ξ (y) is the infimum of h (y, x) over X (Z (y)).
Therefore, in both cases, we are led to a contradiction, implying that the statement preceding and
including (8.69) is true. The idea of using the maximum operator, so that ξ (y) may be allowed to
take the value −∞, is credited to and borrowed from ([25], proof of Theorem 14.60).
F
M
Step 6. There exists a Borel measurable function ξe : R → R, such that
where Rξ ∈ B RM
ξe(y) ≡ ξ (y) ,
is such that PY
∀y ∈ Rξ ⊇ Rξ ,
(8.72)
Rξ ≡ 1, and Rξ ∈ B RM is such that P Y Rξ ≡ 1,
where P Y denotes the completion of the pushforward PY .
From ([48], Proposition 2.12), we know that, since ξ is B RM -measurable, there exists a
B RM -measurable function ξe : RM → R, such that
ξe(y) ≡ ξ (y) ,
49
∀y ∈ Rξ ,
(8.73)
where Rξ is an event in B RM , such that P Y Rξ ≡ 1. However, from Step 2 (see (8.57)),
S E
E
M
and P Y Rξ ≡ 0. Then, it may be easily
we know that Rξ ≡ Rξ Rξ , where Rξ ∈ B R
shown that P Y Rξ ≡ P Y Rξ ≡ 1 and, since P Y and PY agree on the elements of B RM ,
PY Rξ ≡ 1, as well.
F
Step 7. There exists a (P, ε, n)-optimal selector Xnε ∈ FXY (ZY ) : For every ε > 0 and for every
n ∈ N, there exists Xnε ∈ FXY (ZY ) , such that
ε
h (Y, Xn ) ≤ max
inf h (Y, x) , −n + ε, P − a.e..
(8.74)
x∈X (ZY )
This is the most crucial property of the problem that needs to be established, in order to reach
to the final conclusions of Lemma 3. In this step, we make use of Theorem 9. Because Theorem 9
works on Borel spaces, in the following, it will be necessary to work directly on the state space of the
random element Y , equipped with its Borel σ-algebra, and the pushforward PY . In the following,
we will also make use of the results proved in Step 5 and Step 6.
Recall the definition
of
ξ in the statement of Lemma 3. We may readily show that the multifuncM
tion X (Z (·)) is B R -measurable. This may be shown in exactly the same way as in Step 1,
exploiting the hypotheses that the multifunction X and the function Z are both Borel measurable.
Borel measurability of X (Z (·)) will be exploited shortly.
Compare the result of Step 5 with what we would like to prove here; the statement preceding
and including (8.69) is not enough for our purposes; what we would actually like is to be able to
generate a selector, that is, a function of y such that (8.69) would hold at least almost everywhere
with respect to PY . This is why we need Theorem 9. The idea of using Theorem 9 into this context
is credited to and borrowed from [49].
From Step 2 and Step 6, we know that ξ is B RM -measurable and that there exists a
Borel measurable
function ξe : RM → R, such that ξe(y) ≡ ξ (y) , everywhere in y ∈ Rξ , where
Rξ ∈ B RM is such that PY Rξ ≡ P Y Rξ ≡ 1. Then, it follows that
ξe(y) ≡
inf
x∈X (Z(y))
h (y, x) ,
(8.75)
for all y ∈ Rξ .
Define, for brevity, XZ (y) , X (Z (y)), for all y ∈ RM . Towards the application of Theorem 9,
fix any ε > 0 and any n ∈ N and consider the set
x ∈ Xn
(Z (y)) o
, if y ∈ Rξ
ε,n
M
N
e
ΠXZ ≡ (y, x) ∈ R × R
h (y, x) ≤ max ξ (y) , −n + ε
.
(8.76)
c
x ∈ X (Z (y)) ,
if y ∈ Rξ
We will show that Πnε constitutes a measurable set in B RM ⊗ B RN . Observe that Πε,n
XZ ≡
T ε,n S
ΠXZ (Π
Πrem ), where we define
n
o
ΠXZ , (y, x) ∈ RM × RN x ∈ X (Z (y)) ,
(8.77)
50
n
n
o
o
Πε,n , (y, x) ∈ RM × RN y ∈ Rξ , h (y, x) ≤ max ξe(y) , −n + ε
and
(8.78)
o
n
(8.79)
Πrem , (y, x) ∈ RM × RN y ∈ Rcξ .
Clearly, it suffices to show that both ΠXZ and Πε,n are in B RM ⊗ B RN . First, the set
ΠXZ is the graph of the multifunction XZ , and, because XZ is measurable, it follows from ([25],
Theorem 14.8) that ΠXZ ∈ B RM ⊗ B RN . Second, because g is SP ♦FXY (ZY ) , h is jointly
ε,n
Borel measurable. Additionally, Rξ is Borel and ξe is Borel as well. Consequently,
Π can
be
M
N
written as the intersection of two measurable sets, implying that it is in B R
⊗ B R , as
well. And third, Πrem ∈ B RM ⊗ B RN , since Rcξ is Borel, as a complement of a Borel set.
M
Therefore, Πε,n
∈
B
R
⊗
B
RN .
XZ
Now, we have to verify the selection property, set as a requirement in the statement of Theorem
9. Indeed, for every y ∈ Rξ , there exists xy ∈ X (Z (y)), such that (8.69) holds, where ξ (y) ≡ ξe(y)
(see Step 6 and above), while, for every y ∈ Rcξ , any xy ∈ X (Z (y)) will do. Thus, for every
y ∈ RM , there exists xy ∈ RN , such that y, xy ∈ Πε,n
XZ . As a result, Theorem 9 applies and
c
ε,n
implies that there exists a Borel subset RΠ
of PY -measure 0, as well as a Borel measurable
XZ
ε,n . In other words, the Borel
selector Sεn : RM → RN , such that, (y, Sεn (y)) ∈ Πε,n
XZ , for all y ∈ RΠ
XZ
measurable selector Sεn is such that
Sεn (y) ∈ X (Z n(y)) ando
h (y, Sεn (y)) ≤ max ξe(y) , −n + ε,
∀y ∈ Rξ
T
RΠε,n , RξΠε,n ,
XZ
(8.80)
XZ
T
where, of course, PY Rξ RΠε,n ≡ 1. Additionally, (8.80) must be true at y = Y (ω), as long as
XZ
ω is such that the values of Y are restricted to RξΠε,n . Equivalently, we demand that
ω∈
XZ
ω ∈ Ω| Y (ω) ∈
RξΠε,n
X
Z
≡Y
−1
ξ
RΠε,n , Ωεn .
XZ
(8.81)
But RξΠε,n ∈ B RM and Y is a random element and, hence, a measurable function for Ω to RM .
XZ
This means that Ωεn ∈ Y and we are allowed to write
Z
ε
! P (dω)
P (Ωn ) ≡
Y
=
Z
−1
ξ
ε,n
ΠX
Z
R
(
≡ PY
M
y∈R
y∈R
RξΠε,n
X
Z
ξ
ε,n
ΠX
Z
)P
Y
(dy)
≡ 1.
(8.82)
Therefore, we may pull (8.80) back to the base space, and restate it as
Sεn (Y (ω)) ∈ X (ZY (ω)) and
h (Y (ω) , Sεn (Y (ω))) ≤ max {ξ (Y (ω)) , −n} + ε,
51
∀ω ∈ Ωεn ,
(8.83)
where Ωεn ⊆ Ω is an event, such that P (Ωεn ) ≡ 1. Then, by construction, Sεn (Y ) ∈ FXY (ZY ) . As a
result, for any choice of ε > 0 and n ∈ N, the selector Xnε , Sεn (Y ) ∈ FXY (ZY ) is such that
E { g (·, Xnε )| Y } (ω) ≤ max {ϑ (ω) , −n} + ε,
P − a.e..
(8.84)
We are done.
F
Step 8. It is true that
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
E {h (Y, X)} ≤ E
inf
x∈X (ZY )
Define the sequence of random variables $n : Ω → R
h (Y, x) .
n∈N
as (see the RHS of (8.74))
∀ (ω, n) ∈ Ω × N.
$n (ω) , max {ϑ (ω) , −n} ,
(8.85)
(8.86)
Also, recall that E {ϑ} < +∞. Additionally, observe that
∀ (ω, n) ∈ Ω × N,
$n (ω) ≤ max {ϑ (ω) , 0} ≥ 0,
(8.87)
where it is easy to show that E {max {ϑ, 0}} < +∞. Thus, all members of {$n }n∈N are bounded
by an integrable random variable, everywhere in ω and uniformly in n, whereas it is trivial that,
for every ω ∈ Ω, $n (ω) & ϑ (ω) .
n→∞
Consider now the result of Step 7, where we showed that, for every ε > 0 and for every n ∈ N,
there exists a selector Xnε ∈ FXY (ZY ) , such that
h (Y, Xnε ) ≤ $n + ε,
P − a.e..
(8.88)
We can then take expectations on both sides (note that all involved integrals exist), to obtain
E {h (Y, Xnε )} ≤ E {$n } + ε.
(8.89)
Since Xnε ∈ FXY (ZY ) , it also follows that
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
E {h (Y, X)} ≤ E {$n } + ε.
(8.90)
It is also easy to see that $n fulfills the requirements of the Extended Monotone Convergence
Theorem ([45], Theorem 1.6.7 (b)). Therefore, we may pass to the limit on both sides of (8.90) as
n → ∞, yielding
inf
E {h (Y, X)} ≤ E {ϑ} + ε.
(8.91)
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
But ε > 0 is arbitrary.
F
Finally, just combine the statements of Step 4 and Step 8, and the result follows, completing
the proof of Lemma 3.
Remark 15. Obviously, Lemma 3 holds also for maximization problems as well, by defining g ≡ −f ,
for some random function f : Ω × RN → R, under the corresponding setting and assumptions. Note
that, in this case, we have to assume that supX∈F Y
E {f (·, X)} > −∞.
X (ZY
52
)
Remark 16. Lemma 3 may be considered a useful variation of Theorem 14.60 in [25], in the following sense. First, it is specialized for conditional expectations of random functions, which are
additionally SP ♦FXY (ZY ) , in the context of stochastic control. The latter property allows these conditional expectations to be expressed as (Borel) random functions themselves. This is in contrast
to ([25], Theorem 14.60), where it is assumed that the random function, whose role is played by
the respective conditional expectation in Lemma 3, is somehow provided apriori. Second, Lemma
3 extends ([25], Theorem 14.60), in the sense that the decision set FXY (ZY ) confines any solution to
the respective optimization problem to be a Y -measurable selection of a closed-valued measurable
multifunction, while at the same time, apart from natural (and important) measurability requirements, no continuity assumptions are imposed on the structure of the random function induced by
the respective conditional expectation; only the validity of the substitution property is required.
In ([25], Theorem 14.60), on the other hand, it is respectively assumed that the involved random
function is a normal integrand, or, in other words, that it is random lower semicontinuous.
Remark 17. In Lemma 3, variational optimization is performed over some subset of functions measurable relative to Y ≡ σ {Y }, where Y is some given random element. Although we do not pursue
such an approach here, it would most probably be possible to develop a more general version of
Lemma 3, where the decision set would be appropriately extended to include Y -measurable random
elements, as well. In such case, the definition of the substitution property could be extended under
the framework of lower semianalytic functions and universal measurability, and would allow the
development of arguments showing existence of everywhere ε-optimal and potentially everywhere
optimal policies (decisions), in the spirit of [27, 28].
8.2.3
Guaranteeing the Existence of Measurable Optimal Controls
Although Lemma 3 constitutes a very useful result, which enables the simplification of a stochastic
variational problem, by essentially replacing it by an at least structurally simpler, pointwise optimization problem, it does not provide insight on the existence of a common optimal solution, within
the respective decision sets.
On the one hand, it is easy to observe that, similarly to ([25], Theorem 14.60), if there exists an
optimal selection X ∗ ∈ FXY (ZY ) , such that
X ∗ ∈ arg min E { g (·, x)| Y } =
6 ∅,
x∈X (ZY )
P − a.e.,
(8.92)
and Lemma 3 applies, then, exploiting the fact that g is SP ♦FXY (ZY ) , we may write
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
E {g (·, X)} ≡ E {ϑ} ≡ E {ξ (Y )}
= E h Y, X ∗
= E E g ·, X ∗ Y
≡ E g ·, X ∗ ,
(8.93)
implying that the infimum of E {g (·, X)} over X ∈ FXY (ZY ) is attained by X ∗ ; therefore, X ∗ is also
an optimal solution to the respective variational problem. Conversely, if X ∗ attains
the infimum
of E {g (·, X)} over X ∈ FXY (ZY ) and the infimum is greater than −∞, then both E g ·, X ∗ and
53
E {ϑ} are finite, which also implies that E g ·, X ∗ Y and ϑ are finite P − a.e.. As a result, and
recalling Step 3 in the proof of Lemma 3, we have
E E g ·, X ∗ Y − ϑ ≡ 0 and
(8.94)
∗
E g ·, X Y − ϑ ≥ 0, P − a.e..
(8.95)
and, consequently, ϑ ≡ E g ·, X ∗ Y , P − a.e..
Unfortunately, it is not possible to guarantee existence of such an X ∗ ∈ FXY (ZY ) , in general.
However, at least for the purposes of this paper, it is both reasonable and desirable to demand
the existence of an optimal solution X ∗ , satisfying (8.92) (in our spatially controlled beamforming problem, we need to make a feasible decision on the position of the relays at the next time
slot). Additionally, such an optimal solution, if it exists, will not be available in closed form,
and, consequently, it will be impossible to verify measurability directly. Therefore, we have to be
able to show both existence and measurability of X ∗ indirectly, and specifically, by imposing constraints on the structure of the stochastic optimization problem under consideration. One way to
do this, emphasizing on our spatially controlled beamforming problem formulation, is to restrict our
attention to pointwise optimization problems involving Carathéodory objectives, over closed-valued
multifunctions, which are additionally closed -see Definition 5.
Focusing on Carathéodory functions is not particularly restrictive, since it is already clear that,
in order to guarantee the validity of the substitution rule (the SP Property), similar continuity
assumptions would have to be imposed on both random functions g and E { g (·, ·)| Y } ≡ h, as Theorem 8 suggests. At the same time, restricting our attention to optimizing Carathéodory functions
over measurable multifunctions, measurability of optimal values and optimal decisions is preserved,
as the next theorem suggests.
Theorem 10. (Measurability under Partial Minimization) On the base subspace (Ω, Y , P|Y ),
where Y ⊆ F , let the random function H : Ω × RN → R be Carathéodory, and consider another
random element Z : Ω → RN , as well as any compact-valued multifunction X : RN ⇒ RN , with
dom (X ) ≡ RN , which is also closed. Additionally, define H ∗ : Ω → R as the optimal value to the
optimization problem
minimize H (ω, x)
x
, ∀ω ∈ Ω.
(8.96)
subject to x ∈ X (Z (ω))
Then, H ∗ is Y -measurable and attained for at least one Y -measurable minimizer X ∗ : Ω → RN .
If the minimizer X ∗ is unique, then it has to be Y -measurable.
Proof of Theorem 10. From ([26], pp. 365 - 367 and/or [25], Example 14.32 & Theorem 14.37),
we may immediately deduce that H ∗ is Y -measurable and attained for at least one Y -measurable
minimizer X ∗ , as long as the compact (therefore closed, as well)-valued multifunction X (Z (·)) :
Ω ⇒ RN is measurable relative to Y . In order to show that the composition X (Z (·)) is Y measurable, we use the assumption that the compact-valued multifunction X : RN ⇒ RN is closed
and, therefore, Borel measurable (Remark 28 in [26], p. 365). Then, Y -measurability of X (Z (·))
follows by the same arguments as in Step 1, in the proof of Lemma 3.
Remark 18. It would be important to mention that if one replaces RN with any compact (say) subset
H ⊂ RN in the statement of Theorem 10, then the result continues to hold as is. No modification
is necessary. In our spatially controlled beamforming problem, this compact set H is specifically
identified either with the hypercubic region S R , or with some compact subset of it.
54
8.2.4
Fusion & Derivation of Conditions C1-C6
Finally, combining Theorem 8, Lemma 3 and Theorem 10, we may directly formulate the following
constrained version of the Fundamental Lemma, which is of central importance regarding the special
class of stochastic problems considered in this work and, in particular, (4.5).
Lemma 4. (Fundamental Lemma / Fused Version) On (Ω, F , P), consider a random element
Y : Ω → RM , the sub σ-algebra Y , σ {Y } ⊆ F , a random function g : Ω × RN → R, such that
E {g (·, x)} exists for all x ∈ RN , a multifunction X : RN ⇒ RN , with dom (X ) ≡ RN and , as well
as another function ZY : Ω → RN . Assume that:
C1. X is compact-valued and closed, and that
C2. ZY is a Y -measurable random element.
Consider also the nonempty decision set FXY (ZY ) . Additionally, suppose that:
C3. E {g (·, X)} exists for all X ∈ FXY (ZY ) , with inf X∈F Y
X (ZY
)
E {g (·, X)} < +∞,
C4. g is dominated by a P-integrable function, uniformly in x ∈ RN ,
C5. g is Carathéodory on Ω × RN , and that
C6. E { g (·, x)| Y } ≡ h (Y, x) is Carathéodory on Ω × RN .
Then, the optimal value function inf x∈X (ZY ) E { g (·, x)| Y } , ϑ is Y -measurable, and it is true that
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z
Y
)
E {g (·, X)} ≡ E {ϑ} ≡ E g ·, X ∗ ,
(8.97)
for at least one X ∗ ∈ FXY (ZY ) , such that X ∗ (ω) ∈ arg minx∈X (ZY ) E { g (·, x)| Y } (ω), everywhere
in ω ∈ Ω. If there is only one minimizer attaining ϑ, then it has to be Y -measurable.
Proof of Lemma 4. We just carefully combine Theorem 8, Lemma 3 and Theorem 10. First, if
conditions C4-C6 are satisfied, then, from Theorem 8, it follows that g is SP ♦IY . Then, since
FXY (ZY ) ⊆ IY , g is SP ♦FXY (ZY ) , as well. Consequently, with C1-C3 being true, all assumptions of
Lemma 3 are satisfied, and the first equivalence of (8.97) from the left is true. Additionally, from
Theorem 10, it easily follows that the optimal value ϑ is Y -measurable, attained by an at least one
Y -measurable X ∗ , which, of course, constitutes a selection of X (Z (Y )) ≡ X (ZY ), or, equivalently,
X ∗ ∈ FXY (ZY ) . Then, because g is SP ♦FXY (ZY ) , we may write
ϑ≡
≡
inf
E { g (·, x)| Y }
inf
h (Y, x)
x∈X (ZY )
x∈X (ZY )
∗
≡ h Y, X
≡ E g ·, X ∗ Y , P − a.e.,
which yields the equivalence E {ϑ} ≡ E g ·, X ∗ . The proof is complete.
55
(8.98)
Remark 19. Note that, because, in Lemma 4, X ∗ (ω) ∈ X (ZY (ω)), everywhere in ω ∈ Ω, it is true
that X ∗ is actually a minimizer of the slightly more constrained problem of infimizing E {g (·, X)}
over the set of precisely all Y -measurable selections of X (ZY ). Denoting this decision set as
,E
Y
FXY (Z
) ⊆ FX (ZY ) , the aforementioned statement is true since, simply,
Y
inf
Y ,E
(ZY
X∈FX
=⇒
)
inf
Y ,E
(ZY
X∈FX
)
E {g (·, X)} ≥
inf
Y
X∈FX (Z )
Y
E {g (·, X)} ≡ E g ·, X ∗
E {g (·, X)} ≡ E g ·, X ∗ .
(8.99)
(8.100)
,E
where we have used the fact that X ∗ ∈ FXY (Z
. This type of decision set is considered, for simplicity,
Y)
in (4.5), which corresponds to the original formulation of the spatially controlled beamforming
problem.
Lemma 4 is of major importance, as it directly provides us with conditions C1-C6, which,
being relatively easily verifiable, at least for our spatially controlled beamforming setting, ensure
strict theoretical consistency of the methods developed in this paper. At this point, our discussion
concerning the Fundamental Lemma has been concluded.
8.3
8.3.1
Appendix C: Proofs / Section 4
Proof of Theorem 3
Since, in the following, we are going to verify conditions C1-C6 of Lemma 4 in Section 8.2.4
(Appendix B) for the 2-stage problem (4.15), it will be useful to first match it to the setting
of Lemma 4, term-by-term. Table 1 shows how the components of (4.15) are matched to the
respective components of the optimization problem considered in Lemma 4. For the rest of the
proof, we consider this variable matching automatic.
Keep t ∈ N2NT fixed. As in the statement of Theorem 3, suppose that, at time slot t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 ,
po (t − 1) ≡ po (ω, t − 1) is measurable relative to C (Tt−2 ). Then, condition C2 is automatically
verified.
F
Next, let us verify C1. For this, we will simply show directly that closed-valued translated
multifunctions, in the sense of Definition 1, are also closed. Given two closed sets H ⊂ RN , A ⊆ RN
and a fixed reference h ∈ H, let D : RN ⇒ RN be (H, h)-translated in A and consider any two
arbitrary sequences
{xk ∈ A}k∈N and {y k ∈ A − h}k∈N ,
(8.101)
such that xk −→ x, y k −→ y and xk ∈ D (y k ), for all k ∈ N. By Definition 1, xk ∈ D (y k ) if
k→∞
k→∞
and only if xk − y k ∈ H, for all k ∈ N. But xk − y k −→ x − y and H is closed. Therefore, it is
k→∞
true that x − y ∈ H, as well, showing that D is closed. By Assumption 2, C : R2R ⇒ R2R is the
(G, 0)-translated multifunction in S R , for some compact and, hence, closed, G ⊂ S R . Consequently,
the restriction of C in S R is closed and C3 is verified.
F
2
Condition C5 is also easily verified; it suffices to show that both functions |f (·, ·, t)| and
|g (·, ·, t)|2 are Carathéodory on Ω × S, or, in other words, that the fields |f (p, t)|2 and |g (p, t)|2
are everywhere sample path continuous. Indeed, if this holds, VI (·, ·, t) will be Carathéodory, as a
56
Problem of Lemma 4
2-Stage Problem (4.15)
All relay positions and channel observations,
up to (current) time slot t − 1
σ-Algebra C (Tt−1 ), jointly generated
by the above random vector
Optimal value of the second-stage problem,
V (·, ·, t − 1) : Ω × S R → R++
Spatially feasible motion region
C : S R ⇒ S R , with dom (C) ≡ S R
Selected motion policy at time slot t − 2,
po (·, t − 1) : Ω → S R
Decision set Dt
,E
(precisely matched with FXY (Z
))
Random element Y : Ω → RM
σ-Algebra Y , σ {Y }
Random Function
g : Ω × RN → R
Multifunction X : RN ⇒ RN ,
with dom (X ) ≡ RN
Function ZY : Ω → RN
Decision set FXY (ZY )
Y
Table 1: Variable matching for (4.15) and the respective problem considered in Lemma 4.
continuous functional of |f (·, ·, t)|2 and |g (·, ·, t)|2 , and since
h
iT
X
T
T
V
p1 . . . pR , t ≡
VI (pi , t) ,
(8.102)
+
i∈NR
it readily follows that V (·, ·, t) is Carathéodory on Ω × S R . In order to show (everywhere) sample
path continuity of |f (p, t)|2 (respectively |g (p, t)|2 ) on S, we may utilize (3.11). As a result, sample
path continuity of |f (p, t)|2 is equivalent to sample path continuity of
F (p, t) ≡ αS (p) ` + σS (p, t) + ξS (p, t) ,
∀p ∈ S.
(8.103)
Of course, αS is a continuous function of p. As long as the fields σS (p, t) and ξS (p, t) are concerned,
these are also sample path continuous; see Section 3.3. Enough said.
F
We continue with C3. Since we already know that V (·, ·, t) is Carathéodory,
it
follows
from
([44], Lemma 4.51) that V (·, ·, t) is also jointly measurable relative to F ⊗ B S R . Next, let
p (t) ≡ p (ω, t) ∈ S R be any random element, measurable with respect to C (Tt−1 ) and, thus, F ,
too. Then, from ([44], Lemma 4.49), we know that the pair (p (t, ω) , (t, ω)) is also F -measurable.
Consequently, |V (·, p (·, t) , t)|2 must be F -measurable, as a composition of measurable functions.
Additionally, V (·, ·, t) is, by definition, nonnegative. Thus, its expectation exists (Corollary 1.6.4
in [45]), and we are done.
F
Conditions C4 and C6 need slightly more work, in order to be established. To verify C4, we
have to show existence of a function in L1 (Ω, F , P; R), which dominates V (·, ·, t), uniformly in
p ∈ S R . Everywhere in Ω, again using (3.11), and with ς , log (10) /10 for brevity, we may write
h
iT
X
Pc P0 |f (pi , t)|2 |g (pi , t)|2
T
T
V
p1 . . . pR , t ≡
2
2
2
2
2 2
+ P0 σD |f (pi , t)| + Pc σ |g (pi , t)| + σ σD
i∈NR
≤
P0 X
σ
2
+
i∈NR
|f (pi , t)|2
57
≤
≡
≡
≡
P0 X
σ2
10ρ/10 P0 R
σ2
σ2
σ2
≤
P0 R
10
σ2
!
exp ς sup αS (p) ` + χS (p, t)
p∈S
P0 R
!
exp ς sup αS (p) ` + σS (p, t) + ξS (p, t)
p∈S
σ2
ρ/10
!
exp ς sup F (p, t)
p∈S
10ρ/10 P0 R
10
sup exp (ςF (p, t))
p∈S
10ρ/10 P0 R
ρ/10
,
sup |f (pi , t)|2
+ pi ∈S
i∈NR
!
!
exp ς` sup αS (p) exp ς sup χS (p, t)
p∈S
, ϕ (ω, t) > 0,
∀ω ∈ Ω.
p∈S
(8.104)
Due to the fact that αS is continuous in p ∈ S and that S is compact, the Extreme Value Theorem
implies that the deterministic term supp∈S αS (p) is finite. Consequently, it suffices to show that
(
!)
E exp ς sup χS (p, t)
p∈S
< +∞,
(8.105)
provided, of course, that the expectation is meaningfully defined. For this to happen, it suffices that
the function supp∈S χS (p, t) is a well defined random variable. Since both σS (p, t) and ξS (p, t) are
sample path continuous, it follows that the sum field σS (p, t) + ξS (p, t) is sample path continuous.
It is then relatively easy to see that supp∈S χS (p, t) is a measurable function. See, for instance,
Theorem 10, or [38]. Additionally, the Extreme Value Theorem again implies that supp∈S χS (p, t)
is finite everywhere on Ω, which in turn means that the field χS (p, t) is at least almost everywhere
bounded on the compact set S.
Now, in order to prove that (8.105) is indeed true, we will invoke a well known result from the
theory of concentration of measure, the Borell-TIS Inequality, which now follows.
Theorem 11. (Borell-TIS Inequality [38]) Let X (s), s ∈ RN , be a real-valued, zero-mean,
Gaussian random field, P-almost everywhere bounded on a compact subset K ⊂ RN . Then, it is
true that
E sup X (s) < +∞ and
(8.106)
s∈K
u2
n
o
P sup X (s) − E sup X (s) > u ≤ exp −
(8.107)
,
2
s∈K
s∈K
2 sup E X (s)
s∈K
for all u > 0.
58
As highlighted in ([38], page 50), an immediate consequence of the Borell-TIS Inequality is that,
under the setting of Theorem 11, we may further assert that
2
u − E sup X (s)
s∈K
n
o
P sup X (s) > u ≤ exp −
(8.108)
,
s∈K
2 sup E X 2 (s)
s∈K
for all u > E {sups∈K X (s)}.
To show (8.105), we exploit the Borell-TIS Inequality and follow a procedure similar to ([38],
Theorem 2.1.2). First, from the discussion above, we readily see that the field χS (p, t) does satisfy
the assumptions Theorem 11. Also, because χS (p, t) is the sum of two independent fields, it is true
that
n
o
E χ2S (p, t) ≡ η 2 + σξ2 .
(8.109)
As a result, Theorem 11 implies that E supp∈S χS (p, t) is finite and we may safely write
(
!) Z ∞
!
!
E exp ς sup χS (p, t)
≡
p∈S
≡
Z0 ∞
0
P exp ς sup χS (p, t) > x dx
p∈S
P
!
log (x)
sup χS (p, t) >
dx.
ς
p∈S
In order to exploit (8.108), it must hold that
(
)
(
)!
log (x)
> 0.
> E sup χS (p, t) ⇔ x > exp ςE sup χS (p, t)
ς
p∈S
p∈S
Therefore, we may break (8.110) into two parts and bound from above, namely,
(
!)
E exp ς sup χS (p, t)
≡
Z
p∈S
exp(ςE{supp∈S χS (p,t)})
0
+
≤
Z
Z
P
!
log (x)
sup χS (p, t) >
dx
ς
p∈S
∞
exp(ςE{supp∈S χS (p,t)})
P
!
log (x)
sup χS (p, t) >
dx
ς
p∈S
exp(ςE{supp∈S χS (p,t)})
0
+
Z
dx
∞
exp(ςE{supp∈S χS (p,t)})
exp−
(
)!2
log (x)
− E sup χS (p, t)
ς
p∈S
dx
2
2
2 η + σξ
59
(8.110)
(8.111)
(
)!
≤ exp ςE sup χS (p, t)
Z
p∈S
∞
+ς
E{supp∈S χS (p,t)}
(
)!2
u − E sup χS (p, t)
p∈S
exp(ςu) exp−
2
2
2
η
+
σ
ξ
du.
(8.112)
Since both terms on the RHS of (8.112) are finite, (8.105) is indeed satisfied. Consequently, it is
true that
E {ϕ (·, t)} < +∞ ⇔ ϕ (·, t) ∈ L1 (Ω, F , P; R) .
(8.113)
Enough said; C4 is now verified.
F
2
Moving on to C6, the goal here is to show that, for each fixed t ∈ NNT , the well defined random
function H : Ω × S R → R, defined as
H (ω, p) , E {V (p, t) |C (Tt−1 ) } (ω) ,
(8.114)
is Carathéodory. Observe, though, that we may write
X
H (ω, p) ≡
HI (ω, pi ),
(8.115)
+
i∈NR
where the random function HI : Ω × S → R is defined as
(
)
Pc P0 |f (p, t)|2 |g (p, t)|2
HI (ω, p) , E
2
2 C (Tt−1 ) (ω) .
P0 σD
|f (p, t)|2 + Pc σ 2 |g (p, t)|2 + σ 2 σD
(8.116)
Because a finite sum of Carathéodory functions (in this case, in different variables) is obviously
Carathéodory, it suffices to show that HI is Carathéodory.
First, it is easy to see that HI (·, p) constitutes a well defined conditional expectation of a
nonnegative random variable, for all p ∈ S. Therefore, what remains is to show that HI (ω, ·) is
continuous on S, everywhere with respect to ω ∈ Ω. For this, we will rely on the sequential definition
of continuity and the explicit representation of HI as an integral with respect to the Lebesgue
measure, which exploits the form of the projective system of finite dimensional distributions of
|f (p, t)|2 and |g (p, t)|2 . In particular, because of the trick (3.11), it is easy to show that HI can be
equivalently expressed as the Lebesgue integral
Z
HI (ω, p) =
r (x) N (x; µ2 (ω, p) , Σ2 (ω, p)) dx,
(8.117)
2
R
where the continuous function r : R2 → R++ is defined as (recall that ς ≡ log (10) /10)
r (x) ≡ r (x1 , x2 ) ,
Pc P0 10ρ/10 [exp (x1 + x2 )]ς
2
2
P0 σ D
[exp (x1 )]ς + Pc σ 2 [exp (x2 )]ς + 10−ρ/10 σ 2 σD
60
,
(8.118)
for all x ≡ (x1 , x2 ) ∈ R2 , and N : R2 × S × Ω → R++ , corresponds to the jointly Gaussian
conditional density of F (p, t) and G (p, t), relative to C (Tt−1 ), with mean µ2 : (ω, p) → R2×1 and
covariance Σ2 : (ω, p) → S2×2
++ explicitly depending on ω and p as
µ2 (ω, p) ≡ µ2 (C (Tt−1 ) (ω) ; p)
Σ2 (ω, p) ≡ Σ2 (C (Tt−1 ) (ω) ; p) ,
and
(8.119)
∀ (ω, p) ∈ Ω × S.
(8.120)
Via a simple change of variables, we may reexpress HI (ω, p) as
Z
r (x + µ2 (ω, p)) N (x; 0, Σ2 (ω, p)) dx.
HI (ω, p) ≡
R
2
(8.121)
It is straightforward to verify that both µ2 (ω, ·) and Σ2 (ω, ·) are continuous functions in p ∈ S,
for all ω ∈ Ω. This is due to the fact that all functions involving p in the wireless channel model
introduced in Section 3 are trivially continuous in this variable. Equivalently, we may assert that
the whole integrand r (x + µ2 (ω, ·)) N (x; 0, Σ2 (ω, ·)) is a continuous function, for all pairs (ω, x) ∈
Ω × R2 . Next, fix ω ∈ Ω, and for arbitrary p ∈ S, consider any sequence {pk ∈ S}k∈N , such that
pk −→ p. Then, HI (ω, ·) is continuous if and only if HI (ω, pk ) −→ HI (ω, p). We will show this
k→∞
k→∞
via a simple application of the Dominated Convergence Theorem. Emphasizing the dependence on
p as a superscript for the sake of clarity, we can write
1 T p −1
exp − x Σ2
x
2
q
r x + µp2 N x; 0, Σp2 ≡r x + µp2
2π det Σp2
1
p −1
2
kxk2
exp − λmin Σ2
2
q
≤r x + µp2
2π det Σp2
!
kxk22
exp −
2λmax Σp2
p
q
≡r x + µ2
2π det Σp2
!
kxk22
exp −
2λmax Σp2
ς
P0 10ρ/10
p
q
≤
exp x1 + µ2 (1)
σ2
2π det Σp2
≤
P0 10ρ/10
σ2
"
exp x1 +
sup µp2 (1)
p∈S
!#ς
kxk22
p
2sup λmax Σ2
p∈S
r
2π inf det Σp2
exp −
p∈S
,
P0 10ρ/10
σ
2
[exp(x1 + p1 )]ς
61
kxk22
2p2
√
2π p3
exp −
!
, ψ (ω, x) ,
(8.122)
where, due to the continuity of µ2 (ω, ·) and Σ2 (ω, ·), the continuity of the maximum eigenvalue and
determinant operators, the fact that S is compact, and the power of the Extreme Value Theorem,
all extrema involved are finite and, of course, independent of p. It is now easy to verify that the
RHS of (8.122) is integrable. Indeed, by Fubini’s Theorem (Theorem 2.6.4 in [45])
!
Z
Z
kxk22
P0 10ρ/10 exp(ςp1 )
1
ψ (ω, x) dx=
exp(ςx1 )
dx
exp −
√
2
p3
2π
2p2
2
σ2
R
R
!
Z
kxk22
P0 10ρ/10 exp(ςp1 )p2
1
≡
exp(ςx1 )
exp −
dx
√
p3
2πp2
2p2
2
σ2
R
!
Z
P0 10ρ/10 exp(ςp1 )p2
1
x21
=
exp(ςx1 ) √
dx1
exp −
√
p3
2p2
2πp2
σ2
R
P 10ρ/10 exp(ςp1 (ω))p2 (ω)
p2 (ω) 2
p
= 0 2
exp
ς
< +∞, ω ∈ Ω.
(8.123)
2
p3 (ω)
σ
That is,
ψ (ω, ·) ∈ L1 R2 , B R2 , L; R ,
ω ∈ Ω,
(8.124)
where L denotes the Lebesgue measure. We can now call Dominated Convergence; since, for each
x ∈ R2 (and each ω ∈ Ω),
r (x + µ2 (ω, pk )) N (x; 0, Σ2 (ω, pk )) −→ r (x + µ2 (ω, p)) N (x; 0, Σ2 (ω, p))
k→∞
(8.125)
and all members of this sequence are dominated by the integrable function ψ (ω, ·), it is true that
Z
r (x + µ2 (ω, pk )) N (x; 0, Σ2 (ω, pk )) dx
HI (ω, pk )≡
2
R
Z
r (x + µ2 (ω, p)) N (x; 0, Σ2 (ω, p)) dx ≡ HI (ω, p) . (8.126)
−→
k→∞
2
R
But {pk }k∈N and p are arbitrary, showing that HI (ω, ·) is continuous, for each fixed ω ∈ Ω. Hence,
HI is Carathéodory on Ω × S.
F
The proof to the second part of Theorem 3 follows easily by direct application of the Fundamental
Lemma (Lemma 4; also see Table 1).
8.3.2
Proof of Lemma 2
In the notation of the statement of the lemma, the joint conditional distribution of [F (p, t) G (p, t)]T
relative to the σ-algebra C (Tt−1 ) can be readily shown to be Gaussian with mean µF,G
t|t−1 (p) and
2
covariance ΣF,G
t|t−1 (p), for all (p, t) ∈ S × NNT . This is due to the fact that, in Section 3, we have
implicitly assumed that the channel fields F (p, t) and G (p, t) are jointly Gaussian. It is then a
F,G
typical exercise (possibly somewhat tedious though) to show that the functions µF,G
t|t−1 and Σ t|t−1
are of the form asserted in the statement of the lemma. Regarding the proof for (4.34), observe
that we can write
E { |f (p, t)|m |g (p, t)|n | C (Tt−1 )}
62
log (10)
≡ 10
E exp
(mF (p, t) + nG (p, t)) C (Tt−1 )
20
log (10)
T
(m+n)ρ/20
[m n] [F (p, t) G (p, t)]
≡ 10
E exp
C (Tt−1 ) ,
20
(m+n)ρ/20
(8.127)
with the conditional expectation on the RHS being nothing else than the conditional moment
generating function of the conditionally jointly Gaussian random vector [F (p, t) G (p, t)]T at each
p and t, evaluated at the point (log (10) /20) [m n]T , for any choice of (m, n) ∈ Z × Z. Recalling
the special form of the moment generating function for Gaussian random vectors, the result readily
follows.
8.3.3
Proof of Theorem 4
It will suffice to show that both objectives of (4.35) and (4.36) are Carathéodory in Ω × S. But
this statement may be easily shown by analytically expressing both (4.35) and (4.36) using Lemma
2. Now, since both objectives of (4.35) and (4.36) are Carathéodory, we may invoke Theorem 10
(Appendix B), in an inductive fashion, for each t ∈ N2NT , guaranteeing the existence of at least one
e ∗ (t), which solves the optimization
C (Tt−1 )-measurable decision for either (4.35), or (4.36), say p
problem considered, for all ω ∈ Ω. Proceeding inductively gives the result.
8.3.4
Proof of Theorem 6
By assumption, V (p, t) is L.MD.G♦ (Ht , µ), implying, for every t ∈ N+
NT , the existence of an event
R
Ωt ⊆ Ω, satisfying P (Ωt ) ≡ 1, such that, for every p ∈ S ,
µE { V (p, t − 1)| Ht−1 } (ω) ≡ E { V (p, t)| Ht−1 } (ω) ,
∀ω ∈ Ωt .
(8.128)
Fix t ∈ N2NT . Consider any admissible policy po (t) at t, implemented at t and decided at
o
t−1 ∈ N+
NT −1 . By our assumptions, V (·, ·, t) is SP ♦CHt . Additionally, because p (t) is admissible,
it will be measurable relative to the limit
Pt↑ and, hence, measurable relative to Ht . Thus,
σ-algebra
o
o
there exists an event Ωpt ⊆ Ω, with P Ωpt
o
≡ 1, such that, for every ω ∈ Ωpt ,
E { V (po (t) , t)| Ht } (ω) ≡ E { V (p, t)| Ht } (ω)|p=po (ω,t)
≡ ht (ω, po (ω, t)) ,
(8.129)
where the extended real-valued random function ht : Ω×S R → R is jointly Ht ⊗B S R -measurable,
with ht (ω, p) ≡ E { V (p, t)| Ht } (ω), everywhere in (ω, p) ∈ Ω × S R .
Also by our assumptions, V (·, ·, t) is SP ♦CHt−1 , as well. Similarly to the arguments made
↑
above, if po (t) is assumed to be measurable relative to the limit σ-algebra Pt−1
, or, in other words,
admissible at t − 1,
then
it will also be measurable relative to Ht−1 . Therefore, there exists an event
o
o
o
Ωp− ⊆ Ω, with P Ωp− ≡ 1, such that, for every ω ∈ Ωp− ,
t
t
t
E { V (po (t) , t)| Ht−1 } (ω) ≡ E { V (p, t)| Ht−1 } (ω)|p=po (ω,t)
≡ ht− (ω, po (ω, t)) ,
63
(8.130)
where the random function ht− : Ω × S R → R is jointly Ht−1 ⊗ B S R -measurable, with
ht− (ω, p) ≡ E { V (p, t)| Ht−1 } (ω), everywhere in (ω, p) ∈ Ω × S R . Note that, by construction,
po (t) will also be admissible at time t and, therefore, measurable relative to and Ht , as well.
Now, we combine the arguments made above. Keep t ∈ N2NT fixed. At time slot t − 2 ∈ NNT −2 ,
let po (t − 1) ≡ po (ω, t − 1) be a C (Tt−2 )-measurable admissible policy (recall that C1-C6 are
satisfied by assumption; also recall that, if t ≡ 2, C (Tt−2 ) ≡ C (T0 ) is the trivial σ-algebra). At
o
o
o
the next time slot t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 , let us choose p (t) ≡ p (ω, t − 1); in this case, p (t) will also
be C (Tt−2 )-measurable and result in the same final position for the relays at time slot t ∈ N2NT .
As a result, the relays just stay still. Under these circumstances, at time slot t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 , the
o
expected network QoS will be E {V (p (t − 1) , t − 1)}, whereas, at the next time slot t ∈ N2NT , it
will be E {V (po (t − 1) , t)}. Exploiting (8.128), we may write
\ o \ o
µht−1 (ω, p) ≡ ht− (ω, p) , ∀ (ω, p) ∈ Ωt Ωpt−1 Ωp− × S R ,
(8.131)
t
where, obviously, P Ωt
T
o
Ωpt−1
T
o
Ωp− ≡ 1. Consequently, it will be true that
t
µht−1 (ω, po (ω, t − 1)) ≡ ht− (ω, po (ω, t − 1)) ,
∀ω ∈ Ωt
From (8.129) and (8.130), it is also true that
\
o
Ωpt−1
\
o
Ωp− .
t
µE { V (po (t − 1) , t − 1)| Ht−1 } (ω) ≡ E { V (po (t − 1) , t)| Ht−1 } (ω) ,
(8.132)
(8.133)
almost everywhere with respect to P. This, of course, implies that
µE {V (po (t − 1) , t − 1)} ≡ E {V (po (t − 1) , t)} ,
(8.134)
and for all t ∈ N2NT , since t was arbitrary.
Since (8.134) holds for all admissible policies decided at time slot t − 2 ∈ NNT −2 , it will also
hold for the respective optimal policy, that is,
µE V p∗ (t − 1) , t − 1 ≡ E V p∗ (t − 1) , t , ∀t ∈ N2NT .
(8.135)
Next, as discussed above, the choice po (t) ≡ p∗ (ω, t − 1) constitutes an admissible policy decided
∗
∗
at time slot t − 1 ∈ N+
NT −1 ; it suffices to see that p (ω, t − 1) ∈ C p (ω, t − 1) , by definition
of our initial 2-stage problem, because “staying still” is always a feasible decision for the relays.
Consequently, because the optimal policy p∗ (t) results in the highest network QoS, among all
admissible policies, it will be true that
µE V p∗ (t − 1) , t − 1 ≤ E V p∗ (t) , t , ∀t ∈ N2NT ,
(8.136)
completing the proof of Theorem 6.
References
[1] V. Havary-Nassab, S. ShahbazPanahi, A. Grami, and Z.-Q. Luo, “Distributed Beamforming
for Relay Networks based on Second-Order Statistics of the Channel State Information,” Signal
Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 4306–4316, Sept 2008.
64
[2] V. Havary-Nassab, S. ShahbazPanahi, and A. Grami, “Optimal distributed beamforming for
two-way relay networks,” Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1238–
1250, March 2010.
[3] Y. Jing and H. Jafarkhani, “Network beamforming using relays with perfect channel information,” Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2499–2517, June
2009.
[4] G. Zheng, K.-K. Wong, A. Paulraj, and B. Ottersten, “Collaborative-Relay Beamforming with
Perfect CSI: Optimum and Distributed Implementation,” Signal Processing Letters, IEEE, vol.
16, no. 4, pp. 257–260, April 2009.
[5] J. Li, A. Petropulu, and H. Poor, “Cooperative transmission for relay networks based on
second-order statistics of channel state information,” Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions
on, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1280–1291, March 2011.
[6] Y. Liu and A. Petropulu, “On the sumrate of amplify-and-forward relay networks with multiple
source-destination pairs,” Wireless Communications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 10, no. 11,
pp. 3732–3742, November 2011.
[7] Y. Liu and A. Petropulu, “Relay selection and scaling law in destination assisted physical layer
secrecy systems,” in Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP), 2012 IEEE, Aug 2012, pp.
381–384.
[8] N. Chatzipanagiotis, Y. Liu, A. Petropulu, and M. Zavlanos, “Controlling groups of mobile
beamformers,” in Decision and Control (CDC), 2012 IEEE 51st Annual Conference on, Dec
2012, pp. 1984–1989.
[9] D. S. Kalogerias, N. Chatzipanagiotis, M. M. Zavlanos, and A. P. Petropulu, “Mobile jammers for secrecy rate maximization in cooperative networks,” in Acoustics, Speech and Signal
Processing (ICASSP), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, May 2013, pp. 2901–2905.
[10] D. S. Kalogerias and A. P. Petropulu, “Mobi-cliques for improving ergodic secrecy in fading wiretap channels under power constraints,” in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
(ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, May 2014, pp. 1578–1591.
[11] J. Fink, A. Ribeiro, and V. Kumar, “Robust control of mobility and communications in
autonomous robot teams,” IEEE Access, vol. 1, pp. 290–309, 2013.
[12] Y. Yan and Y. Mostofi, “Co-optimization of communication and motion planning of a robotic
operation under resource constraints and in fading environments,” IEEE Transactions on
Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1562–1572, April 2013.
[13] J. Fink, A. Ribeiro, and V. Kumar, “Robust control of mobility and communications in
autonomous robot teams,” IEEE Access, vol. 1, pp. 290–309, 2013.
[14] J. Fink, A. Ribeiro, and V. Kumar, “Robust control for mobility and wireless communication
in cyber-physical systems with application to robot teams,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100,
no. 1, pp. 164–178, Jan 2012.
65
[15] Y. Yan and Y. Mostofi, “To go or not to go: On energy-aware and communication-aware
robotic operation,” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 1, no. 3, pp.
218–231, Sept 2014.
[16] A. Ghaffarkhah and Y. Mostofi, “Path planning for networked robotic surveillance,” IEEE
Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 3560–3575, July 2012.
[17] A. Ghaffarkhah and Y. Mostofi, “Communication-aware motion planning in mobile networks,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 2478–2485, Oct 2011.
[18] S.-J. Kim, E. Dall’Anese, and G. Giannakis, “Cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radios
using kriged kalman filtering,” Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of, vol. 5,
no. 1, pp. 24–36, Feb 2011.
[19] E. Dall’Anese, S.-J. Kim, and G. Giannakis, “Channel gain map tracking via distributed
kriging,” Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1205–1211, March
2011.
[20] M. Malmirchegini and Y. Mostofi, “On the Spatial Predictability of Communication Channels,”
Wireless Communications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 964–978, March 2012.
[21] R. C. Elandt-Johnson and N. L. Johnson, Survival Models and Data Analysis, Wiley, 1999.
[22] R. Durrett, Probability: theory and examples, Cambridge university press, 2010.
[23] J. L. Speyer and W. H. Chung, Stochastic Processes, Estimation, and Control, vol. 17, Siam,
2008.
[24] K. J. Astrom, Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory, vol. 70, New York: Academic Press,
1970.
[25] R. T. Rockafellar and R. J. B. Wets, Variational Analysis, vol. 317, Springer Science & Business
Media, 2009.
[26] A. Shapiro, D. Dentcheva, and A. Ruszczynski, Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling
and Theory (MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization), SIAM-Society for Industrial and Applied
Mathematics, 1st edition, 2009.
[27] D. P. Bertsekas, Dynamic Programming & Optimal Control, vol. II: Approximate Dynamic
Programming, Athena Scientific, Belmont, Massachusetts, 4th edition, 2012.
[28] D. P. Bertsekas and S. E. Shreve, Stochastic optimal control: The discrete time case, vol. 23,
Academic Press New York, 1978.
[29] A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Cambridge university press, 2005.
[30] S. L. Cotton and W. G. Scanlon, “Higher Order Statistics for Lognormal Small-Scale Fading
in Mobile Radio Channels,” Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE, vol. 6, pp.
540–543, 2007.
[31] M. Gudmundson, “Correlation Model for Shadow Fading in Mobile Radio Systems,” Electronics Letters, vol. 27, no. 23, pp. 2145–2146, Nov 1991.
66
[32] A. Gonzalez-Ruiz, A. Ghaffarkhah, and Y. Mostofi, “A Comprehensive Overview and Characterization of Wireless Channels for Networked Robotic and Control Systems,” Journal of
Robotics, vol. 2011, 2012.
[33] A. Kaya, L. Greenstein, and W. Trappe, “Characterizing indoor wireless channels via ray
tracing combined with stochastic modeling,” Wireless Communications, IEEE Transactions
on, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 4165–4175, August 2009.
[34] C. Oestges, N. Czink, B. Bandemer, P. Castiglione, F. Kaltenberger, and A. J. Paulraj, “Experimental characterization and modeling of outdoor-to-indoor and indoor-to-indoor distributed
channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 2253–2265, Jun
2010.
[35] M. G. Genton, “Classes of Kernels for Machine Learning: A Statistics Perspective,” Journal
of Machine Learning Research, vol. 2, no. Dec, pp. 299–312, 2001.
[36] R. J. Adler, The Geometry of Random Fields, vol. 62, Siam, 2010.
[37] P. Abrahamsen, A Review of Gaussian Random Fields and Correlation Functions, Norsk
Regnesentral/Norwegian Computing Center, 1997.
[38] R. J. Adler and J. E. Taylor, Random Fields & Geometry, Springer Science & Business Media,
2009.
[39] L. Aggoun and R. J. Elliott, Measure theory and filtering: Introduction and applications,
vol. 15, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[40] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C,
vol. 2, Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1996.
[41] I. Arasaratnam, S. Haykin, and R. J. Elliott, “Discrete-Time Nonlinear Filtering Algorithms
Using Gauss-Hermite Quadrature,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 953–977, May
2007.
[42] G. H. Golub and J. H. Welsch, “Calculation of Gauss Quadrature Rules,” Mathematics of
computation, vol. 23, no. 106, pp. 221–230, 1969.
[43] B. W. Levinger, “The Square Root of a 2×2 Matrix,” Mathematics Magazine, vol. 53, no. 4,
pp. 222–224, 1980.
[44] C. D. Aliprantis and K. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, Springer
Science & Business Media, 2006.
[45] R. B. Ash and C. Doleans-Dade, Probability and Measure Theory, Academic Press, 2000.
[46] G. W. Mackey, “Borel structure in groups and their duals,” Transactions of the American
Mathematical Society, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 134–165, 1957.
[47] L. Meier, R. Larson, and A. Tether, “Dynamic programming for stochastic control of discrete
systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 767–775, Dec 1971.
67
[48] G. B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and their Applications, John Wiley & Sons,
2nd edition, 1999.
[49] R. E. Strauch, “Negative dynamic programming,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol.
37, no. 4, pp. 871–890, 1966.
68
| 7cs.IT
|
1
Optimal Power Management for Failure Mode of
AC/DC Microgrids in All-Electric Ships
arXiv:1712.02552v3 [cs.SY] 2 Jan 2018
Qimin Xu, Bo Yang, Senior Member, IEEE, Qiaoni Han, Yazhou Yuan,
Cailian Chen, Member, IEEE, Xinping Guan, Fellow, IEEE
Abstract—Optimal power management of shipboard power
system for failure mode (OPMSF) is a significant and challenging
problem considering the safety of system and person. Many
existing works focused on the transient-time recovery without
consideration of the operating cost and the voyage plan. In
this paper, we formulate the OPMSF problem considering the
long-time scheduling and the faults at bus and generator. For
reducing the fault effects, we adopt two-side adjustment methods
including the load shedding and the reconfiguration. To address
the formulated non-convex problem, we transform the travel
equality constraint into an inequality constraint and obtain
a convex problem. Then, considering the infeasibility scenario
affected by faults, a further relaxation is adopted to obtain a new
problem with feasibility guaranteed. Furthermore, we derive a
sufficient condition to guarantee that the new problem has the
same optimal solution as the original one. Because of the mixedinteger nonlinear feature, we develop an optimal algorithm based
on Benders decomposition (BD) to solve the new one. Due to the
slow convergence caused by the time-coupled constraints and the
tailing-off effect, we also propose a low-complexity near-optimal
algorithm based on BD (LNBD). The results verify the effectivity
of the proposed methods and algorithms.
Index Terms—Shipboard power system, failure mode, load
shedding, convex relaxation, Benders decomposition
I. I NTRODUCTION
A. Motivation
Shipboard power system (SPS) is self-powered by distributed electrical power generators operating collectively,
which can be considered as an isolated microgrid. From the
perspective of electrical design of all-electric ship (AES), there
are three architectures of SPS to date, i.e., medium voltage DC
(MVDC), medium voltage AC (MVAC), and higher frequency
AC (HFAC). As the ever-increasing DC-based loads, it is likely
that AES will feature a medium voltage primary distribution
system in the future [1]. Due to the intensive coupling and
finite inertia feature, the consequences of a minor fault in a
system component can be catastrophic. Since the AES mostly
targets at military applications, it is highly susceptible to be
This work was supported by National Key Research and Development
Program of China (2016YFB090190), National Natural Science Foundation
of China (61573245, 61521063, and 61633017). This work was also partially
supported by Shanghai Rising-Star Program under Grant 15QA1402300.
Q. Xu, B. Yang, Q. Han, C. Chen, X. Guan are with the Department
of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China,
Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration, Shanghai 200240, China, and also with the Key Laboratory of
System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China,
Shanghai 200240, China (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]).
Y. Yuan is with the Institute of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University,
Qinhuangdao, 066004, China (e-mail: [email protected]).
damaged. Distinguished from terrestrial systems, the system
failure of SPS is more disastrous due to the personal safety
on the shipboard. Thus, optimal power management of SPS
for failure mode (OPMSF) is essential to guarantee the system
safety, while meeting the load demand.
The time scales of the OPMSF problem includes transienttime, short-time, and long-time. Most of existing works about
OPMSF focused on the recovery at a transient-time scale [2]–
[7] or a short-time scale [8]. Their objective is to improve
the restored power of loads and guarantee the power balance.
However, due to the damaged system structure by faults, the
power supply-demand relationship is changed. Consequently,
the original operating schedule of generators is not suitable for
the remaining voyage owing to the increase of operating cost
and the risk of system safety. Hence, the long-time scheduling
OPMSF problem is essential and meaningful.
The adjustment methods for long-time scheduling can be
classified into two categories, i.e., the supply side and the
demand side. On the supply side, the generators that are
the primary generation equipment cannot operate at original
optimal state caused by faults. Additionally, energy storage
module compensation (ESMC) is a potential solution for improving the energy efficiency of SPS [9]. Hence, the generation
scheduling including ESMC in the remaining voyage has to be
reorganized according to faults. On the demand side, the load
adjustment also plays a key role in optimal power management. The load of SPS includes the propulsion modules and
service loads. The power of propulsion modules constitutes
a large proportion of SPS, which dynamically changes with
operation mode switching. The propulsion power adjustment
(PPA) can achieve significant energy efficiency improvement
[10]. However, once the capacity of generators is not enough to
cover the load demand in the corresponding zones after faults
happening, load shedding of service loads and reconfiguration
of power network are required for guaranteeing the system
safety and completing the voyage. Hence, it is necessary to
consider load shedding and reconfiguration besides PPA on
the demand side. To sum up, two-side adjustment methods
including load shedding and reconfiguration are meaningful
and have significant effects on the OPMSF problem for
guaranteeing the system safety, completing the voyage, and
reducing the operating cost.
B. Literature Review
Many efforts have been devoted to study the OPMSF
problem [2]–[8], [10]–[18]. In the transient-time scale, their
2
main objective is to maximize the weighted sum of restored
loads [2]–[7], [11]–[13]. Additionally, there are other considerations including obtaining the correct order of switching [2],
probability-based prediction of fault effects [3], minimizing
the number or cost of switching actions [4], [5], real-time
management [6], [7], etc. In the short-time scale (warmup time of the backup power sources), the authors in [8]
developed a reference governor-based control approach to
support the non-critical loads as much as possible while
maximizing the battery usage. However, they focused on the
recovery of power supply for loads in a transient-time or
short-time scale, without consideration of the voyage plan and
operating cost after faults in a long-time scale.
In the long-time scale, the algorithms based on the particle
swarm optimization (PSO) method are developed to solve
the optimal power management (OPMS) problem for normal
mode in [10], [15], [16]. In the three works, PPA and ESMC
are considered for improving energy efficiency. Additionally,
energy efficiency operation indicator (EEOI) is taken into
account for the limitation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission.
In [17], dynamic programming (DP) algorithm is adopted
to solve the same problem. In [18], the authors formulated
a multi-objective problem that considers the reduction of
fuel consumption and GHG mitigation together. In the above
works, they do not consider the failure mode for improving
the system safety and reliability. To the best of our knowledge,
there is no work focused on the OPMSF problem in a longtime scale. Meanwhile, due to the damaged power network,
and the usage of reconfiguration and load shedding, the
algorithms in above works cannot be directly adopted to solve
the OPMSF problem.
C. Challenges
The main target of this work is to solve the OPMSF
problem in a long-time scale. There are three main challenges
to solve this problem. Firstly, since reconfiguration and load
shedding are adopted, how to coordinate them with the other
adjustment methods for meeting the load demand in the first
place. Secondly, considering the non-convex feature of the
proposed problem and the infeasibility scenario affected by
faults, appropriate relaxation methods have to be developed to
make the problem tractable. Thirdly, there are more variables
in the two-side adjustment methods for failure mode than that
for normal mode. Furthermore, the variables in the travel and
ESM constraints of this mixed-integer nonlinear programming
(MINLP) problem are coupled in time. Hence reducing the
complexity needs to be considered in the algorithm design.
D. Contributions
In this paper, we deal with OPMSF problem in MVDC SPS
to guarantee the system safety, complete the voyage and reduce
the operating cost. Two-side adjustment methods including
load shedding of service loads and reconfiguration of power
network are all considered in this work. To make this problem
more tractable, we develop two-step relaxations and obtain a
new convex problem. Then, we design an optimal and a nearoptimal low complexity algorithms to solve the new problem.
The contributions of this paper are summarized below.
With the objective of minimizing the total operating
cost that contains the cost of generation, energy storage,
and load shedding, we formulate the OPMSF problem
based on the analysis of faults. Different from existing
works, we add load shedding and reconfiguration into
the adjustment methods considering the fault effects. A
sufficient condition is established to guarantee that load
shedding is adopted only when generator scheduling (GS)
and ESMC cannot solve the OPMSF problem.
• We firstly relax the non-convex travel constraint in the
original problem to obtain a convex problem. Then,
considering the non-feasibility scenarios caused by faults,
we formulate a new MINLP problem with feasibility
guarantee by further relaxing the travel constraint and
adding a penalty term in the objective. Lastly, a sufficient
condition is derived to guarantee that if the original
problem is feasible, the new one has the same optimal
solution; if not, the maximum allowed distance can be
further obtained to assist rescue mission.
• To address the new problem, we design an optimal
algorithm based on Benders decomposition (BD) that
splits it into two more tractable problems (subproblem
and master problem). Due to the slow convergence caused
by the time-coupled constraints and the tailing-off effect,
we propose a low-complexity near-optimal algorithm
based on BD (LNBD) by decomposing the time-coupled
constraints in the subproblem and adding the accelerating
constraints in the master problem.
The paper is organized as follows: in Section II, MVDC SPS
and the main modules are introduced, and the OPMS problem
is formulated; Section III reformulates the OPMSF problem
according to different faults; Section IV details the proposed
offline and online algorithms; the performance of the proposed
method is evaluated in Section V. Finally, the conclusion is
drawn in Section VI.
•
II. S YSTEM M ODELS AND P ROBLEM F ORMULATION
SPS is an integrated power system, which consists of power
generators, energy storage modules (ESMs), loads, converters,
and transmission power network. In this section, these main
models are introduced in detail. Then, the OPMS problem for
normal mode is formulated based on these models. Particularly, the main notations used in this work are summarized in
Table I.
Zone
PORT SIDE
2
11
3
4
Vital and Semivital loads
G1
MTG
AC/DC
Redundancy
Switch
DC/AC
AC/DC
9
10
G2
Bus
ATG
PM
Non-vital loads
5
6
7
8
STARBOARD SIDE
Fig. 1: MVDC shipboard power system architecture.
A. System Structure Overview
The classic architecture of MVDC SPS is shown in Fig.1.
This architecture adopts a zonal approach with a starboard
3
To keep the safe operation of generators and avoid mechanical damage, the output power has to be bounded. Those
constraints are described as follows, ∀t ∈ T , ∀m ∈ M:
max
min
δg,m (t)Pg,m
6 Pg,m (t) 6 δg,m (t)Pg,m
,
max
max
− Rg,m 6 Pg,m (t) − Pg,m (t − 1) 6 Rg,m ,
(1)
δg,m (t) − δg,m (t − 1) 6 yg,m (t),
(3)
6 δg,m (t) + · · · + δg,m (t +
where CG (·) denotes the fuel cost function in arbitrary monetary unit (m.u.), which is determined by the generation power
Pg,m (t). The fuel consumption cost of generators can be
approximately represented by a quadratic function of produced
power Pg,m (t) where ag,m , bg,m , and cg,m are constants
determined by technical specifications of generator m. The
parameter Css is the unit cost of start-up.
C. Energy Storage Module
ESM has an important role in the optimal operation of AES,
which can also increase safety and reliability. An appropriate
ESM can store the excessive energy from the generators or
complementarily supply the load, which realizes the optimal
adjustment for low-cost operation. Different ESM technologies
(e.g., batteries, flywheels, and super capacitors) with different
operating characteristics are available nowadays. Batteries
could be used in relatively large stationary applications for
peak power shaving, and uninterruptible power supply. The
third option of ESM location of multi-zone SPS in [19] is
employed in each zone, which is shown in Fig. 2. ESM is
incorporated with the PB or SB at the longitude bus. There are
PCMs, PDMs for power conversation and load management.
In this case, ESM can supply power for propulsion modules
and service loads.
min
Tm
(2)
− 1),
(4)
where Pg,m (t) denotes the output power of generator m at
min
max
represent the maximum and minand Pg,m
time t. Pg,m
imum output power of generator m. δg,m (t) the status of
Loa d
Loa d
Loa d
Loa d
Loa d
PCM1
Loa d
PDM (AC)
ESM
MVDC
B. Generation Model
min
yg,m (t)Tm
+ cg,m δg,m (t),
Ctr (yg,m (t)) = yg,m (t)Css ,
PDM (DC)
bus (SB) and a port bus (PB), and the SPS is parted into K
electric zones. The generators are classified into two types:
main turbine generator (MTG) and auxiliary turbine generator
(ATG). The distributed layout of generators contributes to
enhancing the overall service capability. In each zone, the
service loads are managed by the power control module (PCM)
and power distribution module (PDM). The structure is shown
in Fig. 2. The DC zones are powered by a set of generators
and converters denoted by m ∈ M. The loads are powered
by a set of buses which run longitudinally along the PB and
SB. Here propulsion modules are considered separately from
service loads because of large energy consumption. In this
work, we assume that the SPS operates in discrete time with
t ∈ T = {1, 2, 3, · · · } and time interval ∆t.
CG (Pg,m (t)) = ag,m (Pg,m (t)∆t)2 + bg,m Pg,m (t)∆t
PDM (DC)
Physical interpretation
Set, number and index of generators and converters
Set, number and index of DC zones
Set, number and indexes of propulsion modules
Set, number and index of ESMs
Set, number and index of island parts
Set, number and index of time
Superscript denoting minimum and maximum
Output power of generator m at time t
Status of generator m, (1/0 = online/offline)
Start-up status of generator m, (1/0 = start-up/shut-down)
Output power of the ESM in zone z at time t
Capacity of the ESM in zone z at time t
Propulsion power of the r-th propulsion module
Total output power of generators in island part w at time
t
PE,w (t)
Total output power of the ESMs in island part w at time
t
PP R,w (t)
Total output power of the propulsion modules in island
part w at time t
PL,w (t)
Total Load demand in island part w at time t
Psv (t)
Power demand of vital and semi-vital loads at time t
Pno (t)
Power demand of non-vital loads at time t
ρ(t)
Lower bound of the load-shedding amount of Pno (t)
V (t)
Ship speed at time t
C(t)
Total operating cost at time t
CG (Pg,m (t)) Fuel cost of generator m at time t
Ctr (yg,m (t)) Startup/shut-down cost of generator m at time t
CE (Pe,n (t)) Operating cost of the ESM z at time t
CL (ρ(t))
Load shedding cost at time t
Pic,m (t)
Input power of converter m at time t
Poc,m (t)
Output power of converter m at time t
SP,z (t)
Redundancy switches of PB in zone z at time t
SS,z (t)
Redundancy switches of SB in zone z at time t
D, Dd
Travel distance, reduced travel distance
PDM (AC)
Notation
M, M , m
Z, Z, z
R, R, r
N , N, n
W, W , w
T , T, t
max, min
Pg,m (t)
δg,m (t)
yg,m (t)
Pe,n (t)
Ee,n (t)
Ppr,r (t)
PG,w (t)
max
generator m. Rg,m
the maximum ramp-rate of generator m.
Constraint (2) demonstrates the maximum ramp-rate constraint
of Pg,m (t). The start-up state yg,m (t) is a binary variable,
which is detected by (3). Eq. (4) describes the minimum
operation time of generators m.
The fuel consumption cost of generator CG (Pg,m (t)) and
start-up/shut-down cost Ctr (yg,m (t)) of generator m at time
t are expressed as, ∀m ∈ M:
PCM1
TABLE I: Main notations
MVDC
PCM2
PDM
PDM
Loa d
Loa d
Fig. 2: Energy storage module location in zonal power system.
The energy capacity and power of ESM should be upper and
lower bounded. The minimum energy E min stored in ESM is
limited by reliability and reserve adequacy reasons, and the
maximum stored energy E max is limited by ESM technical
specifications. Also, the power produced or absorbed by the
ESM are denoted by the maximum charging and discharging
4
powers Pemax , Pemin , respectively. Hence the ESMs satisfy the
following constraints, ∀t ∈ T , ∀n ∈ N ⊆ Z:
Pemin 6 Pe,n (t) 6 Pemax ,
(5)
Ee,n (t + 1) = Ee,n (t) + Pe,n (t)∆t
0 6 Ee,n (t) 6 E max ,
(6)
(7)
where Ee,n (t) and Pe,n (t) represent residual energy and
output power of the ESM in zone z at time t. Pemin is a
negative constant.
The capital cost of ESM is constant, because it is just
relative to E max and P max [20]–[22]. Besides, the charge
energy cannot be purchased from the main grid on the voyage.
Thus, the capital cost and operating cost of ESM are ignored
here. The life-cycle cost of ESM Clc (Pe,n (t)) at each time t
is mainly considered, which is modeled as, ∀n ∈ N :
CE (Pe,n (t)) = alc Pe,n (t)2 + clc ,
where alc and clc are positive constants.
D. Service Loads
In SPS, all the service loads can be divided into three categories by quality of service (QoS) reqirement: vital, semi-vital,
and non-vital loads. Vital loads cannot be interrupted, which
are always required for normal mode. Semi-vital loads can be
interrupted in a short-time scale. In the case of emergencies,
non-vital loads can be shed in a long-time scale to maintain
power balance. At a certain time, vital and semi-vital loads
can be powered by the PB or SB using redundant switches,
which is represented by a pair of switches as shown in Fig.1.
This redundant topology aims to improve the stability of power
supply. The relevant constraint is detailed in subsection II-F.
Each non-vital load connects to one bus, PB or SB. In this
work, load shedding is considered only for non-vital loads.
Thus, the total load demand at time t can be described as:
PL (t) = Pvs (t) + (1 − ρ(t))Pno (t), ρ(t) ∈ [0, 1].
(8)
To reduce the computation complexity, ρ(t) denotes a
continuous variable that indicates the lower bound of the loadshedding amount of all the non-vital loads. The cost of load
shedding at each time t is represented by the load-shedding
amount Pls (t), which is described as:
CL (ρ(t)) = Pls (t) = ρ(t)Pno (t).
E. Propulsion Module
1) Ship Speed: The ship speed is determined by the propulsion power which consumes about 70 to 90 percentage of the
total power. The relationship between them depends on hull
resistance at specific conditions and is formulated as:
PP R (t) = αV (t)β ,
∀t ∈ T ,
P
power PP R (t) = r∈R Ppr,r (t). Here we consider that the
propulsion power is bounded by the respective maximum and
minimum ship speed.
V min 6 V (t) 6 V max ,
∀t ∈ T .
(10)
2) Travel Distance: The total travel distance of all the time
should almost equal to the travel distance target D.
X
V (t)∆t = D.
(11)
t∈T
F. Power Network Model
1) Zone Redundant Switch: The redundant design of zonal
SPS is used for improving the reliability of vital and semivital loads. Besides, it also improves the feasibility of power
supply to reduce the operating cost. In each zone, every
vital and semi-vital loads have two paths to be powered.
SP,z (t) and SS,z (t) respectively represent the state of the
redundant switches connected with the PB and SB in zone z.
0 represents open, and 1 represents close. Thus if SP,z (t) = 1
and SS,z (t) = 0, the vital and semi-vital loads in zone z
are powered by PB, and conversely powered by SB. Thus,
the redundancy switches satisfy following constraints, ∀t ∈
T , ∀z ∈ Z:
SP,z (t) + SS,z (t) = 1, SP,z (t), SS,z (t) ∈ {0, 1},
(12)
ys,z (t)Tsmin 6 SP,z (t) + · · · + SP,z (t + Tsmin − 1),
(13)
where constraint (13) describes the minimum switching time
Tsmin to avoid frequently switching.
2) Power Balance: Supply and demand balance is the
basic operation requirement. Given the hybrid AC/DC power
system, the power equation of the converter is described as:
Poc,m (t) = ζPic,m (t),
∀m ∈ M, t ∈ T ,
(14)
where Pic,m (t) and Poc,m (t) represent the input and output
power of converter m. Here the power loss of converter is
considered as a constant ratio (1 − ζ) with the input power
Pic,m (t). Since the generator directly connects to the converter
and they are tight coupled, we set Pg,m (t) ≈ Pic,m (t). Thus
(14) can be transfered into
Poc,m (t) = ζPg,m (t),
∀m ∈ M, t ∈ T .
(15)
The DC part includes service loads, propulsion module,
and ESMs. Due to the tight couple of DC part in SPS, the
power loss of transmission line can be ignored. So the power
consumption can be represented by the total power of service
loads and propulsion modules. The relationship between them
is given as, ∀t ∈ T :
X
X
X
Poc,m (t) +
Pe,n (t) = PL (t) +
Ppr,r (t). (16)
m∈M
n∈N
r∈R
(9)
where V (t) denotes the ship velocity at time t, PP R (t) the
total required propulsion power to reach the velocity V (t), α
the matching coefficient for propulsion power and velocity,
and β a constant which equals to 3 for conventional hull
form. Propulsion power is the sum of all the propulsion
G. Optimal Power Management of SPS Problem
Considering that this work focuses on the OPMSF problem,
completing the voyage and guaranteeing the system safety are
more important. Thus, GHG emission limitation is not considered here. To address the OPMSF problem, it is necessary
5
to formulate the OPMS problem for the normal mode. First,
we define the control vector at time t as
binary
continuous
z
}|
{
z
}|
{
△
u(t) = ( δg,m (t), yg,m (t) Pg,m (t), Pe,n (t), Ppr,r (t), ρ(t)) .
In the normal mode, SP,z (t) and SS,z (t) do not need to be
reconfigured. Thus, they are not included in u(t).
Then, the objective is to minimize the total operating cost
in the whole voyage, while ensuring the system safety. Thus,
we define the objective function as
X
△
C(t) =
(CG (Pg,m (t)) + Ctr (yg,m (t)))
m∈M
+ ξe
X
CE (Pe,n (t)) + ξl CL (ρ(t)), ∀t ∈ T ,
n∈N
where the operating cost C(t) at time t include the fuel
cost of generators, the start-up/shut-down cost, the operating
cost of ESMs, and the load shedding cost. ξe and ξl are the
parameters used to tradeoff the costs of generators, ESMs and
load shedding.
Theorem 1. To meet the load demand firstly, load shedding
is adopted only when GS and ESMC cannot solve the OPMSF
problem. Thus, ξl has to satisfy that
(17)
ξl > max{2ag Pgmax + bg , 2ξe alc Pemax },
max
, ag = max
where Pgmax = max Pg,m
(ag,m ) , bg =
max
max
max (bg,m ) , m ∈ M, Pe
= max Pe,n
,n ∈ N.
Proof. Please see Appendix A.
Hence the OPMS problem for normal mode is described as:
X
P1 : min
C(t)
u(t)
s.t.
t∈T
(1) − (13), (15), (16),
where the constraints of all the modules which are described
in the former subsections are all taken into account.
III. P ROBLEM A NALYSIS AND T RANSFORMATION
Firstly, we carry out fault preprocessing for generator fault
and bus fault. Then, considering the non-convex constraint and
the fault effects, we transform the problem to make it more
tractable. The problem transformation is illustrated in Fig. 3.
P1 (OPMS)
Original Problem
P4
Relaxed problem
FeasibilityFault
guaranteed
Convex
Preprocessing
Relaxation
Relaxation
P2 (OPMSF)
P3
Semi-island mode
Convex problem
Fig. 3: Problem transformation.
A. Fault Preprocessing
In this subsection, fault preprocessing is introduced in detail,
which has two steps: fault analysis and problem reformulation.
1) Fault Analysis: In this work, we focus on two main
physical faults: generator fault and bus fault. Based on our
analysis, all the faults are divided into three modes, i.e., island
fault, semi-island fault, and non-island fault. The examples of
latter two are shown in Fig. 4.
1
2
S1
P1
11
Converter
MTG
9
SS,1
S7
P7
S4
P4
Sp,1
SS,2
S5
P5
SS,3
S6
5
Zone 1
Sp,4
S8
P8
SS,4
P9
S9
P6
P3
S3
S10
P10
Sp,3
Sp,2
S2
P2
PB
4
3
Semi-Island
10
ATG
P12
S12
7
Zone 3
6
Zone 2
12
Converter
S11
P11
8
Zone 4
SB
Island
Fig. 4: Semi-island and island scenario.
a) Non-island mode: If faults only happen at one bus
(PB or SB), these cases are defined as the non-island mode.
In this mode, the system structure has not been significantly
changed, and the power balance constraint is also not affected.
b) Island mode: Faults that happen at both sides (PB and
SB) divide the zones into several independent island parts. In
this mode, the redundant switches do not need to be changed.
A case is shown in Fig. 4. The DC zone is divided into two
parts without any connection: zone (1, 2, 3) and zone 4.
c) Semi-island mode: This mode is similar to the island
mode, but there are coupled zones between the island parts.
For example, in the semi-island mode of Fig. 4, the loads in
zone 2 can be powered by different islanding parts. If SS2 = 1
and SP2 = 0, zone 2 is powered by ATG, and conversely
powered by MTG. Thus zone 2 is the coupled part, and the
SS2 , SP2 are the coupled redundant switches.
2) Problem reformulation : Based on three fault-modes,
the OPMS problem is reformulated respectively.
a) No-island Mode: In the non-island mode, all the
service loads and propulsion modules can be powered by
MTGs and ATGs, and the redundant switches are reconfigured
to connect to the undamaged bus (PB or SB). Thus, the
OPMS problem for this fault mode is P1 with determined
redundant switch configuration. Similarly, the OPMS problem
in generator fault is P1 with determined state δg,m (t). Thus,
the optimization problems in this mode are classified as P1.
b) Island Mode: Since the power network is damaged
by island-mode faults, the power balance constraint (16) are
correspondingly changed. The power capacity of each island
part is also different from the normal mode. Each island part is
denoted by w ∈ W. Here we reconstruct the power constraint
as, ∀t ∈ T , ∀w ∈ W:
X
X
Ppr,r (t)
Pvs,z (t) + (1 − ρw (t))Pno,w (t) +
r∈Rw
z∈Lw
=
X
m∈Mw
ζPg,m (t) +
X
Pe,n (t),
(18)
n∈Nw
where Lw , Rw , Mw , and Nw denote the sets of service
loads (vital and semi-vital), propulsion modules, generators,
and ESMs in the w-th island part respectively. Pvs,z (t) denotes
the vital and semi-vital loads in zone z at time t. Hence the
constraint (16) is divided into W constraints in this mode.
Let PG,w (t) and PE,w (t) represent the output power of the
generators and ESMs in the w-th island part. Let PL,w (t)
and PE,w (t) represent the demand of the service loads and
6
propulsion modules in the w-th island part. Then, constraint
(18) can be simplified as, ∀t ∈ T , ∀w ∈ W:
PL,w (t) + PP R,w (t) = ζPG,w (t) + PE,w (t),
(19)
where PL,w (t) = PV S,w (t) + (1 − ρw (t))PN O,w (t). PV S,w (t)
and PN O,w (t) denote the vital and semi-vital loads, and nonvital loads in island w respectively.
Since the system is divided into W island parts and the
propulsion modules in one zone practically, P1 is divided into
W independent problems. Only one problem needs to adjust
PP R,w . Based on the relationship of speed and propulsion
power in (9), the speed related constraints (10) and (11) can
be transformed as follows, ∀t ∈ T :
X
(PP R (t)/α)1/β ∆t = D,
(20)
t∈T
α(V min )β 6 PP R (t) 6 α(V max )β .
(21)
Thus the control vector of each part in island mode at time
t can be represented by
△
uw (t) =(δg,m (t), yg,m (t), Pg,m (t), Pe,n (t), Ppr,r (t), ρw (t)),
m ∈ Mw , n ∈ Nw , r ∈ Rw .
The objective function of OPMS problem for this fault mode
in each island part wis defined as
X
△
CG (Pg,m (t)) + Ctr (yg,m (t))
Cw (t) =
m∈Mw
+ ξe
X
CE (Pe,n (t)) + ξl CL (ρw (t)), ∀t ∈ T .
z∈Nw
c) Semi-island Mode: In semi-island mode, the constraint (16) is also divided into W constraints. The coupled
redundant switches SP,x , x ∈ Ωpb,w and SS,y , y ∈ Ωsb,w affect
the total power of loads of this mode. Ωpb,w and Ωsb,w denote
the sets of coupled redundant switches connected to PB and
SB respectively, which belong to the w-th island part. In other
words, the coupled redundant switches reconfiguration is to
determine which island part supplies the power of vital and
semi-vital loads in the coupled zones. Each power balance
constraint is related to the SP,x and SS,y in the coupled zones,
which can be described as, ∀t ∈ T , ∀w ∈ W:
ζPG,w (t) + PE,w (t)
=PL,w (t) + PP R,w (t) +
X
SP,z (t)Pvs,z (t)
z∈Ωpb,w
+
X
(22)
SS,z (t)Pvs,z (t).
z∈Ωsb,w
The relationship between the output power of the ESMs in
different island parts can be described as, ∀t ∈ T , w ∈ W:
min
Ee,w
min
Pe,w
max
EE,w (t) 6 Ee,w
,
max
PE,w (t) 6 Pe,w ,
(23)
EE,w (t) + PE,w (t) = EE,w (t + 1),
(25)
6
6
(24)
where Zw denotes the maximum number of the ESMs
that canPsupply power to the w-th island part, which
min
max
satifies
= Zw Eemin , Ee,w
=
w∈W Zw = Z. Ee,w
max
min
min
max
max
Zw Ee , Pe,w = Zw Pe and Pe,w = Zw Pe .
Hence the control vector of each part in semi-island mode
at time t can be represented by
△
uw (t) =(δg,m (t), yg,m (t), SP,x (t), SS,y (t), Pg,m (t),
Pe,n (t), Ppr,r (t), ρw (t)), m ∈ Mw , z ∈ Zw , (26)
n ∈ Nw , r ∈ Rw , x ∈ Ωpb,w , y ∈ Ωsb,w .
TABLE II: Differences of the OPMS problem for three modes.
Non-island
mode
Objective
function
Control
variables
No. of integer
variable
No. of
continous
variable
Power balance
constraint
some determined
variables
independent between
each island part
add ρw in
each island part
Semi-island
mode
independent between
each island part
add ρw and
redundant switches
2M T
2M T
(2M + 2X)T
(M + N + 2)T
(M + N + W + 2)T
(M + N + W + 2)T
same with P1
independent between
each island part
coupled between
each island part
Island mode
same with P1
The OPMS problems for the three fault-modes are different
with each other in objective function, control variables, and
power balance constraints. The differences are summarized in
Table II. X denotes the number of coupled redundant switches
at PB. Obviously, the OPMS problem for the semi-island
mode is the most complex one due to the added variables
ρw (t), SP,x (t), and SS,y (t). Therefore, it is selected as the
representative OPMSF problem for further analysis in the
following subsection, which is formulated as:
P2 : min
uw (t)
s.t.
X X
Cw (t)
w∈W t∈T
(1) − (4), (8), (12), (13), (20) − (24).
B. Problem Transformation
It is difficult to solve P2 in threefold: travel constrain (20) is
non-convex; the feasibility is affected by faults; it is a MINLP
long-time scheduling problem. Firstly, we relax the constraint
(20) to obtain a convex problem. Secondly, consider that the
relaxed problem is infeasible, a further relaxation of travel
constraint is developed to guarantee the feasibility. We provide
a sufficient condition that if P2 is feasible, the two-step relaxed
problem has the same optimal solution; if not, the maximum
allowed distance can be further obtained.
1) Convex Relaxation: The OPMSF problem is non-convex
due to the constraint (20) with β = 3. Hence we relax it to
inequality one:
D−
X
(PP R (t)/α)1/β ∆t 6 0.
(27)
t∈T
Then, P3 is defined as P2 with (27) instead of (20).
Theorem 2. The relaxed problem P3 is exact, i.e., an optimal
solution of P3 is also optimal for the problem P2, if every of
its optimal solutions satisfies (20).
Proof. Please see Appendix B.
7
2) Feasibility-guaranteed Relaxation: Considering that
there may be no feasible solution of P3 caused by faults, a
further relaxed problem P4 is formulated as:
a) Subproblem: We define the subproblem as
2
X X X
(k)
(k)
(t)∆t
P5 : min Csub =
ag,m Pg,m
(k)
uw,s (t)
P4 :
min
uw (t),Dd
s.t.
X X
Cw (t) + hDd
t∈T w∈W
(28a)
+
w∈W t∈T
D−
X
(PP R (t)/α)1/β ∆t 6 Dd ,
(k)
bg,m Pg,m
(t)∆t
(28b)
+ ξl
t∈T
(1) − (4), (8), (12), (13), (21) − (25),
where Dd is the reduced travel distance that is a positive
variable in P4, and h denotes the penalty parameter due to
the reduced distance. To guarantee that Dd > 0 only if P3 is
infeasible, we derive a sufficient condition as below.
Theorem 3. If P3 has feasible solutions, the optimal solution
of P4 is also the optimal solution of P3 when the penalty h
satisfies:
+ ξe
X
(k)
CE (Pe,n
(t))
n∈N
w
(k)
(k)
CL (ρw (t)) + hDd
X
w∈W
s.t.
m∈Mw
(k−1)
δg,m (t) = δg,m
(t) : λδ,m (t),
SP,x (t) =
SS,y (t) =
(k−1)
SP,x (t)
(k−1)
SS,y (t)
(30a)
: λP,x (t),
(30b)
: λS,y (t),
(30c)
(1), (2), (8), (21) − (25), (28b), (29).
(k)
The control vector of the subproblem uw,s (t) in each part
at time t can be represented by
(k)
△
h>
βα1/β ξl
1/β−1
(PPmax
R )
.
(29)
(k)
(k)
(k)
(k)
u(k)
w,s (t) =(Pg,m (t), Ppr,r (t), Pe,n (t), ρw (t), Dd ),
m ∈ Mw , n ∈ Nw , r ∈ Rw , ∀w, ∀t.
(k−1)
(k−1)
Additionally, if P3 has no feasible solution, D − Dd∗ is the
maximum travel distance that can be achieved in time T . Dd∗
is optimal reduced distance that is obtained from P4 with (29).
Proof. Please see Appendix C.
Remark 1. If there is not any port for repair and maintenance
in the range of D − D∗ , the information D − D∗ can be sent
to the nearest port for rescue in advance.
IV. B ENDERS D ECOMPOSITION
D ESIGN
BASED
A LGORITHM
(k−1)
The variables δg,m (t), SP,x (t), SS,y (t), and
(k−1)
Pg,m (t) are fixed as the input data to the subproblem
which is computed in the master problem. δg,m (t) controls
the constrain (1) and (3). SP,x (t) and SS,y (t) affect the
constraint (12), (13), and (22). λδ,m (t), λP,x (t), λS,y (t), and
λg,m (t) are defined as θ(t), which is a set of dual variables of
uw,m (t). The dual variables provide sensitivties to be used in
constructing Benders’ cut µ(k) for the master problem. In each
iteration, the master problem is improved by the Benders’ cut
µ(k) . The upper bound for the optimal objective value of P4
at iteration k is calculated by
X X
(k)
(k−1)
(k−1)
(t) + cg,m δg,m
(t)
C =
Ctr yg,m
t∈T m∈M
To solve P4, we design an optimal algorithm based on
BD [24]–[26] to optimize the objective over the entire time
domain T . P4 is decomposed into a nonlinear programming
(NLP) problem (subproblem) with fixed integer variables,
and an integer linear programming (ILP) problem (master
problem). The subproblem deals with the continuous variables
and generates a set of dual variables to add Benders cuts in
the master problem. After solving the master problem with
Benders cuts, the optimal integer solution in this iteration
is passed to subproblem. Hence, the subproblem and master
problem are calculated iteratively to obtain the final optimal
solution. Then, due to the slow convergence caused by the
time-couping and the tailing-off effect [25], we propose an
LNBD that decomposes the time-coupled constraints in the
subproblem and adds the accelerating constraints in the master
problem.
+
(32)
(k)
Csub .
b) Master problem: The master problem includes the
minimization of the start-up/shut-down cost of the generation
units and the third term of the fuel consumption cost of
generators. Hence, the master problem can be described as:
P6 : min C (k) =
(k)
uw,m (t)
X X
t∈T w∈W m∈Mw
s.t.
X
(k)
cg,m δg,m
(t) +
µ(k)
+ µ(k)
+ Ctr
X X
(k)
(v)
>
λδ,m (t) δg,m
(t) − δg,m
(t)
m∈M t∈T
+
X X
(k)
(v)
λP,x (t) SP,x (t) − SP,x (t)
+
X X
(k)
(v)
λS,y (t) SS,y (t) − SS,y (t)
y∈Ωsb,y t∈T
Based on the predicted data, the optimal algorithm solves
P4 over the entire time domain T . The subproblem and the
master problem decomposed by BD are described as
(k)
yg,m
(t)
x∈Ωpb,x t∈T
A. Optimal Algorithm
(31)
(v)
+ Csub ; v ∈ [1, · · · , k − 1],
(3), (4), (12), (13).
(33a)
8
The control vector of the master problem uw,m (t) in each
island part at time t can be represented as
(k)
△
(k)
(k)
(k)
u(k)
w,m (t) =(δg,m (t), yg,m (t), SP,x (t), SS,y (t),
(k)
ys,x
(t)), m ∈ Mw , x ∈ Ωpb,w , y ∈ Ωsb,w .
(34)
(9). It has to satisfy that ϕ(T ) = 1 to complete the voyage.
Thus, the subproblem of P4 is redefined as
2
X X
(k)
(k)
(t)∆t
P7 : min Csub =
ag,m Pg,m
(k)
uw,s (t)
w∈W
X
(k)
(k)
+ bg,m Pg,m
(t)∆t + ξe
CE (Pe,n
(t))
The constraints of Benders’ cut µ(k) in P6 are generated in
each iteration. C (k) is the lower bound for the objective value
of P4. The optimal algorithm is summarized in Algorithm 1.
n∈Nw
(k)
(k)
+ ξl CL (ρw (t)) + hDd
(0)
(1), (2), (8), (21) − (24), (30a) − (30c), (35), (36).
s.t.
Algorithm 1 Optimal Algorithm of OPMSF problem
(0)
Input: Initial variables uw,m(t), C
= −∞, and C (0) =
+∞.
Output: Optimal solution uw,s (t) and uw,m (t).
1: Set k ← 1;
2: repeat
(k−1)
3:
Solve the subproblem P5 based on uw,m (t)
4:
if Has feasible solution then
(k)
5:
Obtain an optimal primal solution uw,s (t) and optimal multipliers θ(k) ;
(k)
of P4 by (32);
6:
Calculate the upper bound C
(k)
7:
Obtain the optimal solution uw,m (t) and lower bound
C (k) by solving the master problem P6.
8:
end if
9:
Set k ← k + 1;
(k)
− C (k) < ǫ
10: until C
m∈Mw
b) Master problem: Two constraints are added to improve the convergence, ∀w ∈ W, ∀t ∈ T :
(v)
max
max
PG,w
+ PE,w
> PP R,w (t) + PV S,w (t),
(37)
min
PG,w
(k)
(38)
µ
+
min
PE,w
6 PV S,w (t) + PN O,w (t),
> µ,
(39)
max
the term in (37) is defined as PG,w
=
max
δ
(t)P
and
the
term
in
(38)
g,m
m∈Mw
P g,m
min
min
PG,w
=
m∈Mw δg,m (t)Pg,m . Constraints (37) and
(38) guarantee that the range of the generation power covers
the power of load demand at each time t. Consequently, a
part of invalid solutions can be eliminated. Constraint (39)
gives a lower bound on µ(k) to avoid the search for the
invalid solution below that bound. Thus, the master problem
is redefined as:
X X
(k−1)
(t)
Ctr yg,m
P8 : min C (k) (t) =
where
P
uw,m (t)
t∈T m∈M
B. Low-complexity Near-optimal Algorithm
+
However, the optimal algorithm shows a slow convergence
caused by the time-coupled constraints and the tailing-off effect. Thus, an LNBD is developed to deal with these problems.
a) Subproblem: Here it is needed to decompose the
ESM and travel constraints in (25) and (27). Thus, we allocate
the power of ESMs by adjusting the upperPbound based on the
estimated average load demand P̄L (t). If m∈Mw δg, m(t) >
0, eq. (25) can be replaced by
D(t) + Dd − (PP R (t)/α)1/β ∆t 6 0,
(36)
where the travel distance at time t is calculated by D(t) =
1/β
(P̄P R − (1 − ϕ(t))∆PL (t))/α
∆t. P̄P R denotes the average propulsion power to complete the remaining travel
distance DR (t) which is updated by DR (t) = DR (t − 1) −
D(t) − Dd . Besides, P̄P R (t) can be obtained by DR (t) and
+ µ(k)
s.t. (3), (4), (12), (13), (33a), (37) − (39).
The procedure of the LNBD is the same as Algorithm
1, which is omitted here because of space limitation. The
structure of two algorithms is shown in Fig. 5.
Generation
information
ESM
information
Load
forecast
P6: Master Problem
min
PE,w (t) 6 min{ϕ(t)∆PL (t), Ew (t) − Ew
}, if ∆P > 0;
max
PE,w (t) 6 max{ϕ(t)∆PL (t), Ew (t) − Ew }, if ∆P < 0,
(35)
otherwise, there is no other additional constraint. ∆PL (t) =
PL (t) − P̄L , and ϕ(t) ∈ [0, 1] denotes the parameter for
adjusting the power of ESMs. Besides, based on the P̄L (t),
the travel constraint (27) can be decomposed into
(k−1)
cg,m δg,m
(t)
Startup/shutdown &
Redundant switch decision
ሺ݇ሻ
࢛ ݓǡ݉ ሺሻ
Voyage
target
P8: Master Problem
Accelerating
constraints
Startup/shutdown &
Redundant switch decision
ሺ݇ሻ
࢛ ݓǡ݉ ሺሻ
ሺ݇ሻ
ࣂሺሻǡ ܾݑݏܥǡ
ሺ݇ሻ
ሺ݇ሻ
ࣂሺሻǡ ܾݑݏܥ
Operation cost
optimization problem
Time-constraint
decomposing
ࡼܴܲǡ ݓሺሻ
ࢀ operation cost
optimization problems
P5: Subproblem
P7: Subproblem
Optimal Algorithm
Low complexity
suboptimal Algorithm
Supply side
Generation
schedule
ESM
dispatch
Demand side
Propulsion
schedule
Load
Shedding
Fig. 5: Algorithm structure.
P7: Master Problem
ሺ݇ሻ
࢛ ݓǡ݉ ሺሻ
ሺ݇ሻ
ࣂሺሻǡ ܾݑݏܥǡ
V. S IMULATIONS
In this section, an MVDC SPS and the simulation setup
are described in detail. Then we test the
proposed solution by
ሺሻǡ ࢛
ࡼ
applying it to the MVDC SPS and discuss the results.
ሺ݇ሻ
ܴܲǡݓ
9
A. Simulation Setup
A MVDC SPS with Z = N = 6, T = 12 and M = 2 is
shown in Fig. 6. There is one ESM in each zone. The propulsion module is located in zone 2. The detail parameters are
shown in Table III. This system model is used for validation
and analysis of our algorithm. The subproblems are solved
using the SDPT3 from the CVX package [27], which operates
on an Intel CORE i5 3.4 GHz machine with 8 GB RAM. The
master problem is solved by branch and cut.
13
1
2
3
4
5
6 PB
Sp, 1
Sp, 2
Sp, 3
Sp, 4
Sp, 5
Sp, 6
SS, 1
SS, 2
SS, 3
SS, 4
SS, 5
SS, 6
8
2
9
3
10
4
11
5
12 SB
6
14
Converter
Converter
MTG
7
Zone 1
ATG
Fig. 6: MVDC SPS model and the fault scenario.
TABLE III: Simulation parameters
Normal power (MW)
Technical maximum (p.u.)
Technical minimum (p.u.)
Ramp rate limit (p.u./∆t)
Cost function parameters
Speed & power parameter
Speed (kn)
MTG
8
1
0.15
±90%
ag,1 = 13.5
bg,1 = 10
cg,1 = 300
Css = 100
Propulsion
α = 2.2e−3
V min = 0
ATG
4
1
0.1
±90%
ag,2 = 6
bg,2 = 30
cg,1 = 250
Css = 100
Module
β=3
V max = 17
ESMs
0.5
1
0
±100%
alc = 1
aue = 100
clc = 0
ξe = 1
Others
min
Tm
=2
∆t = 1hour
Fig. 8: Power schedule with two-side management.
are less than 0.5MW which is the minimum operation bound
of the ATG. So the ATG would be damaged if the ATG isn’t
shut down during these times. Besides, the total operating cost
is increased due to the high load of MTG. Therefore, we need
to reorganize the power schedule to guarantee the physical
system safety and optimize the total operating cost. First, the
redundant switches in zone 4 and 5 need to be reconfigured.
Second, the two-side power schedule has to be optimized to
reduce the operating cost and guarantee the ATG safety. The
schedule with two-side adjustment methods is shown in Fig.
8. It can be observed that the propulsion power is decreased
and the ESM power is increased when the power of electrical
loads is increased. The detail performance comparison with
different adjustment methods is given in the next subsection.
To verify the feasibility-guaranteed relaxation, we test our
algorithm with different travel distance D. The results is
shown in Table
The total load-shedding amount is defined
P IV. P
as PLS =
t∈T
w∈W ρw (t)PN O,w (t). We can observe
that load shedding and reconfiguration are always working.
Then, the maximum travel distance 173.46nm can be obtained
based on the results of last three rows. Thus, the feasibilityguaranteed relaxation and the two-side adjustment methods are
essential for the OPMSF problem.
TABLE IV: Two-side management with different distances
Cost (103 m.u.)
Load-shedding amount (MW)
No. of reconfiguring switch
Reduced distance (nm)
150
8.95
0.65
1
0
160
10.7
0.65
1
0
Distance
170
13.1
1.59
1
0
D (nm)
180
190
21.6
32.6
6.46
6.46
1
1
6.54
16.54
200
43.6
6.46
1
26.54
C. Performance Analysis of LNBD
Fig.scenario
7: Poweris schedule
withoutwith
two-side
management.
The
a 12-h voyage
150-nm
total distance.
The system work in an optimal configuration, in which all
the loads are powered to their full capacities. Fig. 6 shows
the initial switch configuration for normal mode. The forecast
service load for the operation 12-h period is plotted in Figs. 7.
The scale factors of three grade loads are set as 0.3, 0.5, 0.2.
The ship operates in a regular cruise mode with a constant
velocity. Thus the propulsion power is constant.
To illustrate the performance of the LNBD, we conduct
the proposed algorithms under the above scenario, different
adjustment methods, and different parameter settings.
1) Performance under different ϕ(t) : Firstly, we test the
optimality under different ϕ(t). The results are shown in table
V. tc denotes the total computation time. It can be observed
that they has a similar performance when ϕ(t) is at the range
of 0.7 ∼ 0.9. To adopt ESMC and PPA together, ϕ(t) is set
to 0.8.
TABLE V: Performance comparison under different ϕ(t)
B. Case Study
For simplicity, a fault scenario that belongs to the semiisland mode occurs at the begin as shown in Fig. 6. If we don’t
change the power schedule of SPS by two-side management,
the power of the service loads at 7 ∼ 11 hours in island part 2
Cost 1
tc (102 s)
1
Optimal
algorithm
8.95
9.48
Cost unit: 103 m.u.
0.2
9.89
0.64
0.3
9.68
0.65
LNBD with different ϕ(t)
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
9.49
9.34
9.20
9.10
0.63
0.67
0.64
0.65
0.9
9.25
0.64
10
Status
2) Optimality and complexity: Then, the verification of the
optimality and complexity performance with D = 180nm
is shown in Table VI. From the column of the number
of variables, it can be observed that the OPMSF problem
has more variables than the OPMS for the normal mode.
Besides, the operating cost of OPMSF problem with twoside management has been reduced significantly than that
of the OPMS problem. Thus, we can observe that two-side
management including load shedding and reconfiguration is
more suitable for the OPMSF problem.
TABLE VI: Performance comparison between two algorithms
Methods
Normal
Only GS
Generation
side mgmt.
Two-side
mgmt.
Fault
Only GS
1
Generation
side mgmt.
Two-side
mgmt.
Cost unit:
104
No. Var.
(Continuous/Integer)
72
(24/48)
96
(48/48)
108
(60/48)
169
(49/120)
193
(73/120)
205
(85/120)
LNBD
Diff.
(%)
Optimal algorithm
Diff.
tc
Cost1
(%)
(s)
/PLS
Cost1
/PLS
1.85
0
12.2
1.85
0
24
1.29
-30.7
11.7
1.32
-30.7
26
1.28
-30.8
30.3
1.31
-30.8
28
10.1
442
254
10.1
442
45
6.60
1.83
/6.5
252
-1.32
910
6.53
1236
1.89
/6.5
252
-1.32
tc
(s)
56
65
m.u.
Additionally, the LNBD can obtain a near-optimal solution
that has a similar operating cost. However, the complexity of
LNBD can be reduced significantly. The computation time tc
is reduced from 1236s and 65s. There also has a limitation
of LNBD that RG has to be larger than the average power of
service load and propulsion modules. If not, the subproblem
is infeasible at the last time T .
VI. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we formulated the OPMSF problem in a longtime scale. Two-side adjustment methods including reconfiguration and load shedding were adopted to guarantee the system
safety, complete the voyage, and reduce the operating cost.
Since the non-convex constraint and fault effects, we developed two-step relaxations to obtain a new problem by convex
relaxation and feasibility guarantee. A sufficient condition was
provided to guarantee that if the original problem is feasible,
the new one has the same optimal solution; if not, the maximum allowed distance can be further obtained to assist rescue
mission. To solve the new problem, we developed an algorithm
based on BD to obtain the optimal solution. Considering timecoupled constraints and tailing-off effect, we also proposed
an LNBD that decomposes the time-coupled constraints and
adds the accelerating constraints. The results illustrated the
feasibility and effectivity of the proposed algorithms. The
future works include the design of more efficient and lowcomplexity algorithms for real-time management.
A PPENDIX A
P ROOF OF T HEOREM 1
To meet the load demand before load shedding, the cost of
load shedding ∆Pno (t) has to be larger than the corresponding
reduced cost of generation power:
ξl ∆Pno (t) = ξl CL (ρ̂(t)) − ξl CL (ρ(t))
> CG (P̂g,m (t)) − CG (Pg,m (t)),
ξl ∆Pno (t) > ξe (CE (P̂e,n (t)) − CE (Pe,n (t))).
(40)
(41)
where P̂· (t) and P· (t) denote two different arbitrary output
power at time t.
The (40) and (41) can be simplified as:
ξl >
ag,m (P̂g,m (t) + Pg,m (t))∆Pno (t) + bg,m ∆Pno (t)
∆Pno (t)
= ag,m (P̂g,m (t) + Pg,m (t)) + bg,m ,
ξl > ξe alc
(42)
(P̂e,n (t) + Pe,n (t))∆Pno (t)
∆Pno (t)
= ξe alc (P̂e,n (t) + Pe,n (t)).
(43)
The right terms of (42) and (43) can be simplified as:
ag,m (P̂g,m (t) + Pg,m (t)) + bg,m < 2ag Pgmax + bg ,
ξe alc (P̂e,n (t) + Pe,n (t)) <
2ξe alc Pemax ,
(44)
(45)
max
where Pgmax = max Pg,m , ag = max
(ag,m ) , bg =
max
,n ∈ N.
max (bg,m ) , m ∈ M, Pemax = max Pe,n
Combining (42)-(45), we have that if ξl satisfies:
ξl > 2ag Pgmax + bg ,
(46)
ξl > 2ξe alc Pemax ,
(47)
the Eqs. (40) and (41) can be hold. They can be simplified as:
ξl > max{2ag Pgmax + bg , 2ξe alc Pemax }.
(48)
A PPENDIX B
P ROOF OF T HEOREM 2
In order to prove that the relaxation is exact, it is necessary
to show that any optimal solution of P3 has equality in (27).
One optimal solution is denoted by u∗w (t) which is expressed
as
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
u∗w (t)= δg,m
(t), yg,m
(t), SP,x
, SS,y
, Pg,m
(t), Pe,n
(t),
∗
∗
Ppr,r (t), ρw (t) .
For the sake of contradiction, we assume that u∗w (t) has strict
inequality, i.e.,
X
D−
(PP∗ R,w (t)/α)1/β ∆t < 0.
t∈T
Then, we consider another solution ũw (t) which is defined
by:
∗
∗
∗
δ̃g,m (t) = δg,m
(t), ỹg,m (t) = yg,m
(t), S̃P,x = SP,x
,
∗
∗
∗
S̃S,y = SS,y
, P̃g,m (t) = Pg,m
(t) − ε, P̃e,n (t) = Pe,n
(t),
∗
P̃pr,r (t) = Ppr,r
(t) − ε, ρ̃w (t) = ρ∗w (t),
∗
where it satisfies that 0 < ε 6 Ppr,r
(t)−α(D/T ∆t)1/β . It can
be verified that ũw (t) satisfies all the constraints of P3, thus
it is a feasible point. However, since P̃g,m (t) = Pg,m (t)∗ − ε,
the objective value of ũw (t) is strictly smaller than of uw (t)∗ .
This contradicts the assumption that uw (t)∗ is the optimal
solution.
11
A PPENDIX C
P ROOF OF T HEOREM 3
To guarantee that the optimal solution of P4 is also the
optimal solution of P3 if P3 has feasible solutions, the
increased cost hDd must be greater than the decreased cost
∆C(t) of generation power caused by the reduced distance,
which can
hDd > ∆C(t).
(49)
According to (20) and Theorem 2, the left term of (49) can
be transformed into
β1
X
X
1
hDd =h
(PP R (t)/α) β ∆t,
P̂P R (t)/α ∆t − h
t∈T
t∈T
(50)
where P̂P R (t) and PP R (t) are the original and reduced power
of propulsion modules at time t, respectively.
Then, based on Lagrange mean value theorem, we have
X
t∈T
=
1
βα
1
β
β1
X
1
(PP R (t)/α) β ∆t
P̂P R (t)/α ∆t −
t∈T
β1 −1 X
PP R (t)
P̂P R (t) − PP R (t) ∆t,
t∈T m∈M
+2alc ξe
XX
Pemax ∆Pe,n (t)∆t
+ξl
XX
∆Pno (t)∆t.
t∈T n∈N
Considering that alc in life-cycle cost function is a small
max
constant, we have (2ag,m Pg,m
+bg,m ) < (2ag Pgmax +bg ) < ξl
max
and ξl > 2ξe alc Pe . Hence, there holds
X X
∆C(t) <(2ag Pgmax + bg )
∆Pg,m (t)∆t
t∈T m∈M
+2ξe alc Pemax
XX
+ξl
∆Pno (t)∆t
X
(∆PG (t) + ∆PE (t) + ∆Pno (t)) ∆t.
t∈T
t∈T
(51)
Thus, combing (53) and (56), we have that
1
h>
′
1
1
(52)
Combing (51) and (52), (50) can be transformed into
X
1
h
β −1
(PPmax
(P̂P R (t) − PP R (t))∆t
R )
1/β
βα
t∈T
X
1
h
β −1
P̂G (t) + P̂E (t) + ρ̂(t)Pno (t)
= 1/β (PPmax
R )
βα
t∈T
=D −
X
1
h
β −1
(PPmax
(∆PG (t) + ∆PE (t) + ∆Pno (t))∆t,
R )
1/β
βα
t∈T
(53)
where P̂P R (t) and PP R (t) are the reduced power of generators
and ESMs, respectively.
At a deviation ∆PG (t), ∆PE (t), and ∆Pno (t), the change
of δg,m (t) gives a additional chance to reduce the operating
cost. Hence, the best solution uw (t) with a changed δg,m (t)
has a lower operating cost than the one with same δg,m (t).
Based on this, we can obtain that
X X
X
∆C(t) 6
CG (P̂g,m (t)) −
CG (Pg,m (t)) ∆t
m∈M
CE (P̂e,n (t)) −
X
CE (Pe,n (ρt)) ∆t
t∈T
n∈N
n∈N
X
+ ξl
CL (ρ̂(t)) − CL (ρ(t)) ∆t.
t∈T
.
(57)
X
(PP R,w (t)/α)1/β ∆t 6 0.
(58b)
t∈T
=
m∈M
1
β −1
(PPmax
R )
Therefore, if h satisfies (57), there hold (49). Consequently,
the optimal solution of P4 is also the optimal solution of P3
if P3 has feasible solutions and h satisfies (57).
If P3 has no feasible solution, Dd in any feasible solution
must be greater than zero. (28b) can rewritten as
X
D − Dd −
(PP R,w (t)/α)1/β ∆t
(58a)
−
− PG (t) − PE (t) − ρ(t)Pno (t) ∆t
X X
βα β ξl
t∈T
hDd >
t∈T
(56)
X
t∈T
′
∆Pe,n (t)∆t
t∈T n∈N
′
β −1 .
(PP R (t)) β −1 > (PPmax
R )
(55)
t∈T n∈N
<ξl
where PP R (t) ∈ (PP R (t), P̂P R (t)).
Consider that β > 1, there hold
+ ξe
For simplicity, eq. (54) can be transformed into
X X
max
∆C(t) <
(2ag,m Pg,m
+ bg,m )∆Pg,m (t)∆t
(54)
Since there is no Dd in P4 that replaced (28b) with (58b),
hDd in the objective (28a) can be removed. Hence, this
reformulated problem is similar with P3. The optimal solution
u(t)∗ of P4 is also the optimal solution of P3 that replaced
(28b) with (58b). Based on the Theorem 2, it can be known
that the maximum travel distance that can be achieved in time
T is D− = D − Dd∗ .
R EFERENCES
[1] R. E. Hebner, F. M. Uriarte, A. Kwasinski, A. L. Gattozzi, H. B.
Estes, A. Anwar, P. Cairoli, R. A. Dougal, X. Feng, H.-M. Chou, L. J.
Thomas, M. Pipattanasomporn, S. Rahman, F. Katiraei, M. Steurer,
M. O. Faruque, M. A. Rios, G. A. Ramos, M. J. Mousavi, and T. J.
Mccoy, “Technical cross-fertilization between terrestrial microgrids and
ship power systems,” J. Modern Power Syst. Clean Energy, pp. 1–19,
2015.
[2] S. Das, S. Bose, S. Pal, N. N. Schulz, C. M. Scoglio, and B. Natarajan,
“Dynamic reconfiguration of shipboard power systems using reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 669–676,
2013.
[3] S. K. Srivastava and K. l. Butler-Purry, “Probability-based predictive
self-healing reconfiguration for shipboard power systems,” IET Gener.,
Transm. Distrib., vol. 1, pp. 405–413, 2007.
[4] S. Bose, S. Pal, B. Natarajan, C. M. Scoglio, S. Das, and N. N. Schulz,
“Analysis of optimal reconfiguration of shipboard power systems,” IEEE
Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 189–197, 2012.
12
[5] Y. Jiang, J. Jiang, and Y. Zhang, “A novel fuzzy multiobjective model
using adaptive genetic algorithm based on cloud theory for service
restoration of shipboard power systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst.,
vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 612–620, 2012.
[6] G. Seenumani, J. Sun, and H. Peng, “Real-time power management of
integrated power systems in all electric ships leveraging multi time scale
property,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 20, pp. 232–240,
2012.
[7] X. Feng, K. L. Butler-Purry, and T. Zourntos, “A multi-agent system
framework for real-time electric load management in MVAC all-electric
ship power systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1327–
1336, 2015.
[8] G. Seenumani, H. Peng, and J. Sun, “A reference governor-based
hierarchical control for failure mode power management of hybrid
power systems for all-electric ships,” J. Power Sources, vol. 196, no. 3,
pp. 1599–1607, 2011.
[9] V. Shagar, S. G. Jayasinghe, and H. Enshaei, “Effect of load changes
on hybrid shipboard power systems and energy storage as a potential
solution: A review,” Inventions, vol. 2, no. 3, 2017.
[10] F. Kanellos, “Optimal power management with GHG emissions limitation in all-electric ship power systems comprising energy storage
systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 330–339, 2014.
[11] T. Amba, K. L. Butler-Purry, and M. Falahi, “Genetic algorithm based
damage control for shipboard power systems,” in Proc. ESTS, Baltimore,
MD, USA, Apr. 20-22, 2009, pp. 242–252.
[12] M. Nelson and P. E. Jordan, “Automatic reconfiguration of a ship’s
power system using graph theory principles,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst.
Technol., vol. 51, pp. 2651–2656, 2015.
[13] P. Mitra and G. K. Venayagamoorthy, “Implementation of an intelligent
reconfiguration algorithm for an electric ship’s power system,” IEEE
Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 47, pp. 2292–2300, 2011.
[14] S. Mashayekh and K. L. Butler-Purry, “An integrated securityconstrained model-based dynamic power management approach for
isolated microgrids in all-electric ships,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst.,
vol. 30, no. 99, pp. 1–12, 2015.
[15] F. Kanellos, A. Anvari-Moghaddam, and J. Guerrero, “Smart shipboard
power system operation and management,” Inventions, vol. 1, no. 4,
2016.
[16] F. Kanellos, A. Anvari-Moghaddam, and J. Guerrero, “A cost-effective
and emission-aware power management system for ships with integrated
full electric propulsion,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 150, pp. 63–75,
2017.
[17] F. Kanellos, G. Tsekouras, and N. Hatziargyriou, “Optimal demand-side
management and power generation scheduling in an all-electric ship,”
IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1166–1175, 2014.
[18] C. Shang, D. Srinivasan, and T. Reindl, “Economic and environmental
generation and voyage scheduling of all-electric ships,” IEEE Trans.
Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 4087–4096, 2016.
[19] C. Yan, G. K. Venayagamoorthy, and K. A. Corzine, “Optimal location
and sizing of energy storage modules for a smart electric ship power
system,” in Proc. IEEE CIASG, Paris, FR, Apr. 11-15, 2011, pp. 1–8.
[20] W. Shi, N. Li, C. C. Chu, and R. Gadh, “Real-time energy management
in microgrids,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 8, pp. 228–238, Jan 2017.
[21] S. Schoenung, “Energy storage systems cost update, a study for the
DOE energy storage systems program,” Sandia National Laboratories,
no. SAND2011-2730, 2011.
[22] H. Khani and M. R. D. Zadeh, “Real-time optimal dispatch and
economic viability of cryogenic energy storage exploiting arbitrage
opportunities in an electricity market,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 6,
pp. 391–401, Jan 2015.
[23] Q. Xu, B. Yang, Q. Han, C. Chen, and X. Guan, “Optimal Power Management for Failure Mode of AC/DC Microgrids in All-Electric Ships,”
ArXiv e-prints http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv171202552X,
2017.
[24] C. A. Floudas, “Nonlinear and mixed-integer optimization: fundamentals
and applications,” Oxford University Press, 1995.
[25] W. S. Sifuentes and A. Vargas, “Hydrothermal scheduling using benders
decomposition: Accelerating techniques,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst.,
vol. 22, pp. 1351–1359, Aug 2007.
[26] A. Nasri, S. J. Kazempour, A. J. Conejo, and M. Ghandhari, “Networkconstrained ac unit commitment under uncertainty: A benders’ decomposition approach,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, pp. 412–422, Jan
2016.
[27] M. Grant, S. Boyd, and Y. Ye, “CVX: Matlab software for disciplined
convex programming,” 2008.
| 3cs.SY
|
arXiv:1803.07369v1 [cs.SY] 20 Mar 2018
Optimal Symbolic Controllers Determinization
for BDD storage.
Ivan S. Zapreev, Cees Verdier, Manuel Mazo Jr.
Center for Systems and Control, Technical University of Delft, The
Netherlands (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected])
March 21, 2018
Supported by STW-EW as a part of the CADUSY project #13852.
The short version of this article has been accepted to ADHS’2018.
Abstract
Controller synthesis techniques based on symbolic abstractions appeal
by producing correct-by-design controllers, under intricate behavioural
constraints. Yet, being relations between abstract states and inputs,
such controllers are immense in size, which makes them futile for embedded platforms. Control-synthesis tools such as PESSOA, SCOTS, and
CoSyMA tackle the problem by storing controllers as binary decision diagrams (BDDs). However, due to redundantly keeping multiple inputs
per-state, the resulting controllers are still too large. In this work, we
first show that choosing an optimal controller determinization is an NPcomplete problem. Further, we consider the previously known controller
determinization technique and discuss its weaknesses. We suggest several
new approaches to the problem, based on greedy algorithms, symbolic
regression, and (muli-terminal) BDDs. Finally, we empirically compare
the techniques and show that some of the new algorithms can produce
up to ≈ 85% smaller controllers than those obtained with the previous
technique.
1
Introduction
Controller synthesis techniques based on symbolic models, such as e.g. [28, 23,
17], are becoming increasingly popular. One of the key advantages of these techniques is that they allow for synthesising correct-by-construction controllers of
general nonlinear systems under intricate behavioural requirements. However,
the downside of the synthesised controllers is their size as, in essence, they
1
are huge tables mapping abstract state-space elements into input-signal values. Even for toy examples, the produced controllers can reach a size of several
megabytes. In real-life applications however, they can be several orders of magnitude larger. The latter prohibits them from being used on embedded microcontrollers which typically have very limited memory resources. In general, this
state-space explosion is the consequence of: (1) the number of abstract system states and inputs which are exponential in the number of dimensions and
inverse-polynomial in the discretisation values; and (2) storing multiple valid
input signals per abstract state.
There are numerous tools, implementing or incorporating control synthesis, such as PESSOA, SCOTS, CoSyMA, LTLMoP, TuLiP, see [18], [24], [19],
[7], and [32] correspondingly. Internally, they either use an explicit control law
representation in a table form or employ Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams, introduced by [4] and called RO-BDDs or simply BDDs, in an attempt
to optimise the memory needed to store the synthesised control law. RO-BDDs
are canonical, efficiently manipulable, and in many cases allow for compact data
representation. However, their size is strongly dependent on the variables’ ordering and the problem of finding an optimal one is known to be NP-complete,
as shown by [3]. To fight that issue, tools such as SCOTS and Pessoa use the
state of the art RO-BDD library CUDD, see [26], which implements numerous
efficient variable ordering optimisation heuristics. Yet, even when using BDDs,
controllers synthesised for practical applications can easily reach hundreds of
megabytes.
To our knowledge, there have been just a few attempts made to find compact
but practical representations of (symbolically produced) control laws. Except
for using BDDs, we are only aware of another two approaches. The first one,
suggested by [27], uses piece-wise linear functions, also known as linear in segments (LIS) functions, to approximate control functions of the form g : R → R.
The approximation is considered for scalar control functions of one argument
only. The main motivation for LIS is to reduce the memory footprint of implementing controllers at the cost of some on-line computations, which nonetheless
are fast to perform. However, this approach does not directly scale to multiple
dimensions or allows to resolve multiple-input’s non-determinism.
Another technique to reduce the control-law size, we shall refer to as LA
(Local Algorithm), was proposed by [9]. It borrows ideas from algebraic decision
diagrams (ADDs), see [1], for compact function representation and exploits the
non-determinism inherent to safety controllers. The considered controllers are
multi-valued maps g : Rn ⇒ N. The suggested approach attempts to optimise
the controller size determinizing the control law by choosing one of the possible
control signals for each of the state-space points. In the selection of such unique
inputs, LA maximizes the size of state-space neighbourhoods employing the same
input with the expected outcome of minimizing an ADD representation of the
resulting control function. However, the minimality of the ADD representation
cannot be guaranteed in general by this approach, which leads us to investigate
if better compression approaches may be viable.
In this paper, we first prove that the problem of choosing a size-optimal
2
controller determinization is NP-complete. We do that assuming the BDD
controller representation, but the result can be easily generalised. Next, we
suggest two new determinization approaches : GA (Global Algorithm) - based
on a greedy algorithm for the minimum set-cover selection problem, see [12, 5];
SR - a hybrid of ADD-based and symbolic regression techniques, powered by
genetic programming, see [14, 31]. GA attempts to minimise the BDD size by
maximising the number of controller states having the same input signal. It
differs from LA in that, when choosing a common input for a set of states, it
looks at the state-space globally, without considering the actual state positions.
SR (Symbolic Regression) aims at bridging the intrinsic limitations of LA and
GA by using “arbitrary” (polynomial and sigmoid in our case) functions as controller representations. This way we realise the Kolmogorov’s [16] view on data
compression1 . Further, we combine LA and GA into a hybrid approach called LGA
(Local-Global Algorithm). The idea here is that the determinization is done as
in LA but, if multiple common inputs are possible, the preference is given to the
one suggested by GA. In addition, we consider B-prefixed version of LGA (BLGA)
which attempts for a better compression by using BDD variable reordering to
produce abstract state indexes.
We perform an empirical evaluation on a number of examples from the literature. Our results show that compression-wise2 there is no absolute best
approach. However, LGA seems, on most cases, to be providing the best compression. The SR approach, while only providing better compressions in few
examples, may be most promising when looking at actual embedded deployments, if it could be pushed to remove any use of BDDs, and their overhead on
actual implementations.
2
2.1
Preliminaries
Minimum set cover
The minimum set cover problem (MSC) is formulated as:
Problem 2.1 (MSC). Given a set X and a cover {Sj }j∈I , i.e. X ⊆
S
where |X|, |I| < ∞, find the smallest subcover I ∗ ⊆ I : X ⊆ j∈I ∗ Sj .
S
j∈I
Sj ,
Both, the decision and selection versions of (MSC, are known to be NPcomplete. The first approximate poly-nomial-time solution for MSC was given
by [12]. Later, [5] suggested an approximate poly-nomial-time solution for the
generalized “minimum set weight cover problem” (MWSC); which extends MSC
by that each set Sk is assigned a weight sk ≥ 0 and the question is to find
the smallest sub-cover with the minimum total weight. According to [6], the
Chvátal’s algorithm time complexity is: O (|I| · |X| · min (|I|, |X|)).
1 Instead of storing the control law as an explicit map, we search for a symbolic function
that for a given state computes the input value.
2 Up to the found optimal BDD variable reordering.
3
2.2
Symbolic regression
Symbolic regression is a type of regression analysis that searches for analytical expressions best fitting a given dataset of numerical data, both in terms of
accuracy and simplicity. We apply this technique in order to find the smallest
analytical expressions best fitting symbolic-model-based control-law functions,
ensuring for the smallest control law representation. One of the most popular means for symbolic regression is genetic programming, see [13] (GP). In
this work, similar to [30], we employ grammar guided genetic programming algorithms (GGGP) to find multi-dimensional analytical expressions fitting the
controller’s data. In fact, the genetic process follows [29] except for that the realvalue parameter tuning is done with CMA-ES [10]. To speed up the CMA-ES
procedure, we use sep-CMA-ES which has a linear time and space complexity
[21].
2.3
Binary Decision Diagrams
Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), represented with rooted directed acyclic
graphs were introduced by [4], as a compact representation for boolean funcn
n
tions F : {0, 1} → {0, 1}. Given F with a list of arguments {vi }i=0 , also
called BDD variables or just variables, the BDD of F results from the Shannon
expansion thereof. The order of arguments in the signature of F has clearly
no impact on F itself, but it has a drastic impact on the size of the resulting
BDD. Finding a size-optimal BDD variable ordering was shown, in [3], to be
NP-complete. Yet, there are multiple polynomial heuristics, [25], that can find
a semi-optimal variable ordering. One of the most popular thereof is sifting,
[22], and its variants. Given a fixed variable order, each BDD has a canonical minimum-size representation, called Reduced Ordered BDD (RO-BDD).
Assuming the bottom-up BDD traversal, an RO-BDD can be obtained by the
following poynomial-time algorithm, for more details see Section 4.2 of [4]:
1. Combine terminal nodes with equal values
2. Eliminate nodes with equivalent3 children
3. Combine nodes with pairwise equivalent children
Multi Terminal BDDs (MTBDDs) extend BDDs in that tree’s terminal
nodes allow for arbitrary labels, thus useful to encode functions of the form
n
F : {0, 1} → U , with |U | < ∞. The BDD reduction algorithm is naturally
extendable towards MTBDD which thus have the canonical RO-MTBDD form.
For an (MT)BDD M , we define R (.) as a reduction function producing the
RO-(MT)BDD R (M ). Algebraic Decision Diagrams (ADDs), introduced by
[1], are a synonym of MTBDDs. The current state of the art implementation
for RO-(MT)BDDs is provided by the CUDD package [26].
3 “Equivalent”
means: Representing the same binary function.
4
2.4
SCOTS v2.0
SCOTS is an open source software that implements construction of symbolic
models, also known as discrete abstractions, of possibly perturbed, nonlinear
control systems. The tool natively supports invariance and reachability specifications as well as several control synthesis algorithms. The control laws can
be stored in BDD. SCOTS comes in a form of a header-only C++ library that
can be easily included in any C/C++ code but also has a MATLAB interface.
We base our algorithms on the interfaces provided by the UniformGrid and
SymbolicSet classes of the tool.
3
Problem statement
Consider a (possibly non-linear) discrete time control system of the form:
x(k + 1) = f (x(k), u(k)), x(k) ∈ X ⊆ Rn , u(k) ∈ U ⊆ Rm .
Symbolic approaches, see e.g. [28], automatically synthesize controllers in the
form of discrete state transition systems. Furthermore, the resulting controllers
can often be reduced to a look-up table, see [20], prescribing for each point of
the state-space a set of applicable inputs guaranteeing that the control specification is satisfied. Such synthesized controllers usually take the form of the
combination of a (finite) set-valued map g : S ⇒ V, and quantization maps
qx : X → S, qu : U → V reducing the originally infinite state and input sets
to finite sets (usually defining a grid), i.e. S ⊂ X , S ⊂ X , |S| < ∞, |V| < ∞.
Moreover, the usual approach is to quantize each dimension of X and U independently, i.e. qx (x) = (q1x (x1 ), . . . , qnx (xn )), qu (u) = (q1u (u1 ), . . . , qnu (un )),
where each of the qix : Xi ⊂ R → Si , such that S = S1 × . . . × Sn , and similarly
for the input quantizer. This results in controller implementations selecting at
each time step u(k) ∈ g (qx (x(k))), see for details of such controllers [20]. Most
often, the controllers synthesized do not provide a valid input for some subset
S∅ ⊂ S. We define the set Sc := S \ S∅ . We may assume that there is some
element nc ∈ V denoting a “no-input”, and thus we can define S∅ := g −1 (nc).
A symbolic controller g ⊆ S×V, by indexing the countable sets Si and Vi , can
alternatively be interpreted as a relation g ⊂ Z≥0 × Z≥0 . Consider B := {0, 1},
and let us define a fixed-length base-2 bit encoding for non-negative integers
bits : K → B b for some K ⊂ Z≥0 , |K| < ∞, and b := dlog2 (max (K))e. For
k = (k1 , k2 ) ∈ g ⊂ Z≥0 × Z≥0 , mapping the bit vector (bits (k1 ) , bits (k2 )) to a
boolean 1 defines a BDD encoding of g. Similarly, one can construct an MTBDD
encoding of g by mapping bits (k1 ) to k2 .
Relating elements of S or V with Z≥0 can be done with an indexing function,
5
typically defined as:
fb (ka , . . . , kb ) :=
b
X
ki ·
i=a
i−1
Y
2|bits(Nj )| , or
(1)
j=a
fs (ka , . . . , kb ) :=
b
X
i=a
ki ·
i−1
Y
Nj
(2)
j=a
Here, Nj :=|Sj | for j∈1, n, and Nj :=|Vj | for j∈n+1, n+m; |bits (Nj ) | is the
data-type size needed to enumerate intervals in j. Equations 2 and 1 are
both used in SCOTSv2.0. The former is employed in its interface classes
(UniformGrid and SymbolicSet), as it delivers smaller indexes. The latter
is used for BDD encoding as it avoids bit sharing between distinct dimension
interval indices.
In the present we consider the following minimisation problem aimed at
finding the smallest controller determinization of a given controller g:
Problem 3.1 (OD). Find the best determinization g ∗ of a controller g optimizing: g ∗ = argming̃∈F |enc (g̃)|, where
F:
= {g̃ : Z≥0 → Z≥0 |
∀s ∈ Dom (g) : ((g̃ (s) ∈ g (s)) ∧ (|g̃ (s) | = 1))} ,
enc (.) encodes controllers into RO-(MT)BDDs, and |.| provides the (MT)BDD
size.
In theoretical derivations, as in [15], we define |.| to be the number of
(MT)BDD nodes. In practice, |.| is the number of bits used to store the
(MT)BDD by the CUDD package in the best-found, variable reordering.
4
LA on MTBDDs
[9] suggests a controller-size minimisation technique, which we call LA, that uses
ideas from MTBDDs to represent the controller function in the form of a binary
tree. The approach does dimension-wise binary splitting of the controller’s
state-space bounding box. The areas with no-inputs are considered to allow
for any input. For the areas with common inputs possible a single input is
selected non-deterministically. A branch in the tree represents a state-space
area with all states having common inputs (stored in terminal nodes). The
determinization aims at choosing single inputs in a way minimising the depth
of the tree branches. The latter is equivalent to reductions as in steps (1) and
(2) of the RO-BDD construction (c.f. Section 2.3), but not (3). [9] showed that
LA can lead to drastic size reductions, e.g., for “the simple thermal model of
a two-room building” example the original controller required 1.000.000 data
units, whereas in the tree format it went down to 27. Yet, in its original form
this approach: (i) does not preserve the controller’s domain – neglecting basic
6
x1
x2
{1, 5}
x2
{4, 3}
{1, 2}
{0, 3}
Figure 1: An example MTBDD
data of safe initial states; (ii) employs a fixed state-space splitting algorithm –
not using controller’s structural features; (iii) uses simple binary trees which are
less efficient than MTBDDs, due to the latter compression abilities by variable
reordering and their canonical reduced form. This motivates extending the
approach towards MTBDDs.
LA can be adapted to quantised state-spaces, since:
(i) For dimension i∈1, n and si ∈Si , the bit sequence bits (si ), defines a binarytree path to si in Si .
(ii) For s∈S, the alternating bit sequence obtained from bits (s1 ) , . . . , bits (sn )
defines a binary-tree path to s in S.
The latter, using bounded-length bit sequences as in Section 3, allows to encode
the LA’s binary tree as an MTBDD. The size reductions obtained for the original
LA are then a subset of those we get using MTBDDs4 , as we can: (i) obtain
RO-MTBDDs, utilising all the reduction steps (ii) find a more efficient variable
ordering. Let us now show that, however good, LA does not allow to utilise the
full power of the MTBDD reductions due to its pure spacial orientation.
Consider an MTBDD encoding of some LA’s binary tree, in its original variable ordering, see Figure 1. LA traverses an MTBDD trying to find common
inputs, stored in terminal nodes, for all of its sub-trees. A sub-tree with a
common input can then be trivially reduced to a single terminal node. In this
case however, there are no non-trivial sub-trees with common inputs, so LA has
to non-deterministically choose one (arbitrary) input value per terminal node.
This results in 16 possible determinization variants, most of which would not
be reducible, see e.g. Figure 2, but a few would allow for reductions; the best
one is in Figure 3.
In this paper, we suggest alternatives and hybrid approaches to overcome
this potential shortcoming of LA, see Section 6. Furthermore, to preserve information on safe initial states, we shall consider a modification of LA which
forbids assignment of “any input” to “no-input” grid cells.
5
NP-completeness of determinization
Theorem 5.1. The OD problem is NP-complete (NP-C).
4 Even
with the original variable ordering.
7
x1
x2
{5}
x2
{4}
{1}
{3}
Figure 2: A non-reducible determinization
x1
x2
{1}
x2
x2
{3}
{1}
{1}
{3}
{3}
(b) After reduction
(a) After determinization
Figure 3: A reducible determinization
Proof. To show that OD is NP-complete we prove that:
(i) OD is NP: Consider a non-deterministic algorithm5 , Algorithm 1, solving
the selection OD. To prove that OD is NP, one must show that Algorithm 1
has polynomial time complexity and contains a polynomial number of random guesses, each independent on the problem size. Clearly, all of the Algorithm 1 steps have polynomial time complexity. First of all, iterating over
Q ∈ 0, . . . , |M |, checking for |M 00 | == Q, and reducing R (M 0 ), see Section 2.3,
are polynomial time. Further, let us show that “guessing M 0 from M ” can also
be done in polynomial time with a polynomial number of Bernoulli trials. First,
to visit M ’s terminal nodes requires O (|M |) steps. Second, for a node, having at most |U| inputs, to randomly choose one input requires O (dlog2 (|U|)e)
Bernoulli trials. So we conclude that6 OD is NP.
(ii) MSC is polynomial-time/space convertible to OD: For an MSC with X :=
N
K
{xi }i=1 , S := {Sj }j=1 , ∀j ∈ 1, K : Sj ⊆ X, and N, K < ∞, consider the next
three proving steps:
a) Encode MSC as an MTBDD M : Take a binary tree with N terminal nodes,
l
indexed by i ∈ 1, N . For each terminal
node
i add a low (left) ti and a hhight
h
l
(right) ti children, such that val ti := j ∈ 1, K|xi ∈ Sj and val ti :=
{K + i}. Here, val (.) is terminals’ labelling function; the low terminals encode
the MSC sets; and the high terminals prevent all but low-terminals’ reductions.
The resulting binary tree T is a polynomial-space encoding of MSC as7 : |T | = 4×
5 I.e. it has a non-deterministic step which always makes a “proper” (relative to the
algorithm’s goal) guess, see e.g. [2].
6 All the missed auxiliary operations, e.g.: counting node inputs, removing the non-chosen
inputs, and etc. are also polynomial time.
7 Remember that we have 2 × N terminal nodes.
8
Input: M - Controller’s MTBDD
Result: Size-optimal determinization of M
for Q ∈ 0, . . . , |M | do
Guess M 0 - a determinization of M
M 00 ← R (M 0 );
if |M 00 | == Q then
return M 00
end
end
Algorithm 1: NP algorithm for selection OD
N − 1. Also, this is a polynomial-time encoding, as is realisable by Algorithm 2,
of time complexity O (N ). To convert this binary tree into an MTBDD M , we
shall interpret its non-terminal nodes as decision nodes, and its terminal nodes
t as value nodes, labeled with val (t). This trivial conversion can also be done
in polynomial time and space.
b) Solving OD for M solves MSC : For the given M encoding of MSC, R (M 0 ),
in Algorithm 1, can only re-combine low terminals of M 0 as high-terminal and
thus non-terminal node reductions are prevented by the distinct high terminal
node idexes. The high and non-terminals will stay intact and Algorithm 1 will
effectively minimise the number of low terminals. The set I of low-terminal
labels of M 00 then yields the solution for MSC as: (a) I defines a sub-cover of S;
(b) |I| is minimal. The former is clear as each xi of X is related to a low-terminal.
The latter can be proved by contradiction. First, fix low-terminal node values
of M to those of I to get an MTBDD MI for which |R (MI ) | = 3 × N − 1 + |I|.
Let us assume that I is not a solution of MSC then there exists a sub-cover I 0 ,
such that |I 0 | < |I|. Similarly, for MI 0 we have |R (MI 0 ) | = 3 × N − 1 + |I 0 |,
and thus R (MI 0 ) < R (MI ). The latter contradicts the fact that Algorithm 1
solves OD.
c) Decoding MSC solution from OD solution: Decoding of the MSC solution
from M 00 is straightforward: one needs to go through all of the low-terminal
nodes and collect their labels. This requires linear time and space algorithm.
Finally, since MSC is NP-C, (i)&(ii), imply that OD is NP-C.
6
Determinization algorithms
The newly suggested determinization algorithms have various underlying ideas:
GA tries to maximise the number of states with the same input, and minimise
the number of different inputs as a whole, both in an attempt to maximise the
chances for (MT)BDD reductions; LGA combines complementary ideas of LA and
GA to reduce the number of non-deterministic choices to be taken in the former
one; SR attempts to find an analytical expression fitting the controller points
on the largest part of its domain to reduce the number of distinct control mode
9
N
Input: X = {xi } - Set elements
K
Input: S = {Sj }j=1 - Set cover
Result: The MTBDD encoding for MSC
Node root ← null
if N > 0 then
QueuehNodei terms (N ) ← empty
uint cnt ← 1
root ← new Node ()
terms.push back (root)
while cnt 6= N do
Node term ← terms.pop f ront ()
terms.push back (term.low ← new Node ())
terms.push back (term.high ← new Node ())
tcnt ← cnt + 1
end
uint idx ← 1
while terms 6= empty do
Node term ← terms.pop f ront ()
term.low ← new Node ( get set ids(xidx , S ))
term.high ← new Node ( {K + idx} )
idx ← idx + 1
end
end
return root;
Algorithm 2: Encode MSC as OD
10
areas to be stored;
6.1
Global Approach
The GA approach is summarised in Algorithm 3, where:
(i) inputs to states (.) creates C – the set of domain state indexes, I – the
set of input indexes, and {Cj }j∈I – the sets of states for the given inputs;
(ii) get min set cover(.) implements the MSC solution algorithm for unit set
weights8 , see Section 2.1;
(iii) determinize (.) iterates over I ∗ and for each state with the input removes
all other inputs.
Input: M - the controller’s MTBDD
Result: The determinized
MTBDD
C, I, {Cj }j∈I ← inputs to states(M )
Vector I ∗ ← get min set cover C, I, {Cj }j∈I
M 0 ← determinize (M, I ∗ )
return R (M 0 );
Algorithm 3: The GA approach
GA differs from LA by looking at the state-space globally regardless of its’
elements location. It maximizes the number of terminal nodes with identical
labels, generally leading to a reduction in the number of used labels, which
should facilitate MTBDD reductions.
6.2
Local-Global Approach
Recall the MTBDD-based LA algorithm discussed in Section 4. We showed that
such determinization procedure can suffer from sub-optimal non-deterministic
resolutions when multiple input choices are available in some regions. LGA combines LA with GA in an attempt to improve the resulting reductions by minimising
this uncertainty. In essence, the LGA approach proceeds as LA up to the moment
a non-trivial set of inputs, common for a grid area, is found; then the input is
chosen according to the priority-descending order of inputs, as pre-computed by
the get min set cover (.) function, see Algorithm 3.
6.3
BDD-index based Local-Global Approach
RO-(MT)BDDs achieve significant size reductions only if a “good” variable ordering is found, see Section 2.3. Given the (MT)BDD encoding, see Equation 1
8 The function returns a vector of inputs, ordered in the same way they were added to I ∗ ,
with the more common inputs coming first.
11
(a) SCOTSv2.0 grid-cell index encoding
(b) RO-BDD grid-cell index encoding
Figure 4: DC motor: controller function
of Section 3, the variable reordering swaps grid-cell index bits realising a limited9
form of cell re-indexing. Figure 4 shows the effects thereof on the g ⊂ Z≥0 ×Z≥0
function for an LGA-determinized BDD controller of the DC motor case study,
see Section 7.1. The horizontal and vertical axes of the plots correspond to the
state- and input-space element indexes respectively. The distinct vertical lines
on Figures 4a and 4b are the 1.000 point marks. According to Section 3, the
BDD’s range of S indexes is wider than that of SCOTSv2.0. Comparing g (.) in
RO-BDD and SCOTSv2.0 indexes, the former exhibits better data clustering.
To use this to our benefit, we suggest a version of LGA, called BLGA, using the
RO-BDD indexes.
6.4
Symbolic Regression
For the SR algorithm, a set of candidate controllers is evolved using a combination of GGGP and sep-CMA-ES, c.f. references in Section 2.2, using imax
individuals (i.e. candidate solutions) for N generations. GGGP is used to evolve
the functional structure of the controller based on a grammar and sep-CMA-ES
to optimize the parameters. Given a candidate controller gSR : Rn → Rm , the
fitness function F with respect to a finite set S is defined as:
F (gSR , Sc ) =
|{s ∈ Sc | qu (gSR (s)) ∈ g(s)}|
.
|Sc |
In order to reduce the computation time, the set of states Sc is down-sampled
to a set with a maximum of λ elements. The reproduction involves selecting
individuals based on tournament selection and the genetic operators crossover
and mutation, in which parts of the individuals are exchanged or randomly
altered respectively. More in depth descriptions of the used GGGP and sepCMA-ES algorithms can be found in [29] and [21] respectively. After a maximum
amount of generations the individual with the highest fitness is selected. For the
resulting controller, it is verified for which states s ∈ Sc it holds that qu (gSR (s)) ∈
g(s). For the remaining states the inputs are determinized using GA, LA or LGA.
Finally, all states and corresponding new input indexes are again stored in a
BDD.
9 Swapping
bits affects all indexes; bits can not change value.
12
For our experiments we used the parameters in Table 1. Table 2 shows the
grammar employed to determine in which space analytical expressions to fit the
controllers were selected. Here sgn denotes the signum function and Random
Real ∈ [−1, 1] creates a random real within the specified interval. The used
starting symbol is hstrti.
Table 1: SR parameters
parameters
λ
N
M
d
(cc , cm )
σ0
NES
value
1000
50
32
7
(0.5, 0.5)
1
10
explanation
Cardinality of down-sampled Sc
Max. number of GGGP generations.
Maximum number of individuals.
Maximum tree depth of genotypes.
Crossover and mutation chance.
Initial standard deviation.
Max. number of CMA-ES generations.
Table 2: Production rules P
Nonterminal
hstrti ::=
hexpri ::=
hlini ::=
hpoli ::=
hmoni ::=
hvari ::=
hconsti ::=
7
7.1
Rules
hconsti + hexpri | hconsti · hexpri
| hconsti + hconsti · hexpri
hlini | hpoli | 0.5sgn(hlini) + 0.5 + hexpri
| 0.5sgn(hpoli) + 0.5 + hexpri
hconsti · x1 + . . . hconsti · xn
hpoli + hpoli | hconsti × hmoni
hvari | hvari × hmoni
x1 | · · · | xn
Random Real ∈ [−1, 1]
Empirical evaluation
Case studies
All of the considered case-studies, but the last one, are taken from the standard distribution of SCOTSv2.0: Aircraft - a DC9-30 aircraft landing maneuver, see [20]; Vehicle - a path planning problem for an autonomous vehicle,
see [33] and [20]; DCDC - a boost DC-DC converter with a reach-and-stay voltage
specification, see [8]; DCDC rec 1/2 - the same as DCDC but enforces a recurrence specification for two targets; DCM - a DC motor with a reach-and-stay
velocity specification, see [18].The symbolic BDD controller sizes were varied by
modifying the models’ input-/state-space discretisation parameters.
13
7.2
Software details
For the evaluation, we have realised the following software:
• A C++11 based LibLink library10 for Mathematica 11, see [11], allowing
to load and store BDD-based symbolic controllers of SCOTSv2.0.
• A C++11 based application implementing LA, GA, LGA, and BLGA. Our
code is single-threaded as constrained by CUDD.
• A Mathematica 11 package implementing the SR approach. This realisation is natively multi-threaded and allows for a best utilisation of the CPU
cores.
7.3
Experimental setup
We have measured: (i) determinization run-time in seconds as reported by the
tools; (ii) size of the determinized controllers in bytes, when stored to the file
system. SR is probabilistic and therefore each of its experiments was repeated 5
times. All other approaches are deterministic and thus their experiments were
repeated only once. Overall, we have considered the algorithms on various size
models, varying the discretization parameters, and thus changing:
1. The number of model inputs:
(a) GA, LA, LGA, BLGA
(b) SR on LGA determinized controllers
2. The number of model states:
(a) GA, LA, LGA, BLGA
SR was only done on LGA determinized controllers because it: (i) did not scale
well with the growing number of inputs; (ii) if feasible, shall be capable of
reducing deterministic controllers. The experiments were done on two machines:
(A) MacBook Pro with: Intel i5 CPU (4 cores) 2.9 GHz; 8 GB 2133 Mhz RAM;
MacOS v10.12.6; (B) PC with: Intel Xeon CPU (8 cores) E5−1660 v3 3.00GHz;
32 GB 2133 MHz RAM; Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS. The type (1.a) experiments ran
on machine (A); (1.b) and (2) on (B).
Given, a significant difference in software realization (Mathematica v.s. C++11,
multi v.s. single threaded), running SR on faster multicore machine, and that
controllers’ determinization is an offline job, our run-time data: (i) is only
dedicated to show the approaches’ feasibility; (ii) can only hint the actual performance differences between SR and others. This is why also the run-time for
LA, GA, LGA, and BLGA is not averaged over multiple re-runs.
10 We
preferred LibLink over WSTP due to faster data-exchange.
14
7.4
Results
Table 3 presents the core experimental data for models obtained by varying
the number of inputs. Here, column: “SCOTS” lists information for the original controllers; “Time” is the algorithm’s run-time in seconds; “A-SR” and
“M-SR”stand for the average and maximum SR values over 5 repetitions; and
“Fit %” is the fitness percentage of the SR controller’s symbolic part. To compare the compressing power of the approaches, for an algorithm ω and a case
study ν we define size compression as: Cων :=(1 − |Bων |/|B ν |)∗100, where B ν and
Bων stand for the original and ω-determinized BDD sizes. Comparing algorithms
“ω1 v.s. ω2 ” is done by computing a difference ∆νω1 ,ω2 :=Cων 1 − Cων 2 . Clearly,
∆νω1 ,ω2 > 0 means ω1 being better than ω2 on ν. Taking into account the A-SR
ν
experiment repetitions, we define11 : CA-SR
:= E [CSRν ].
Figure 5 contains two compression comparison sets: (i) GA, LGA, BLGA v.s.
LA; and (ii) A-SR, M-SR v.s. LGA12 . The plot features mean compressions and
the standard deviation thereof. We conclude the next compression ranking of
the algorithms: 1. LGA, 2. BLGA, 3. LA, 4. GA, 5. M-SR 6. A-SR.
Figure 6 summarises the execution times for the set-up of Table 3. Relative
to LA, on average: GA is ≈ 0.8 times faster; LGA is comparable; BLGA is ≈ 1.1 times
slower; A-SR is ≈ 180 times slower but has a huge deviation of ≈ 174. The latter
is due to probabilistic nature of SR. Note that, A-SR is multi-threaded and was
run on a faster machine than the single-threaded LA. So the actual performance
difference between the algorithms is more significant.
Additionally, we compared GA, LGA, BLGA and LA on up to 52 Mb size BDD
controllers, obtained by varying the number of system states. These experiments
only strengthened the algorithms’ ranking conclusions implied by Figure 5. We
omit further detail on that, to save space.
To conclude, we present Figure 7 summarising the compression of LGA relative to LA on all of the 67 considered BDD controllers. Per case-study ν the
ν
ν
ν
compression is computed as: CLGA,
LA :=(1 − |BLGA |/|BLA |) ∗ 100. The plot on the
ν
left of Figure 7 shows the discretized distribution of CLGA,
LA , the plot on the right
shows its mean and standard deviation. Notice that, on average, LGA produces
≈ 14% smaller controllers than LA, in the best case LGA was capable of delivering
up to ≈ 85% smaller controllers.
8
Conclusions
In this work, we have considered the problem of size-optimal BDD controllers
determinisation (OD), which we show to be NP-complete. Up until now, the only
heuristic approach to solve OD was proposed by [9] and was based on representing
the controller function as a binary tree. We have shown how that such an
approach, which we call LA, can be extended to use the more size-efficient RO(MT)BDDs data structure. In addition, we have identified examples where LA
11 The
mean value over 5 experiment repetitions of SR on ν.
SR was applied to the LGA-determinized controllers.
12 Since
15
Table 3: Core experimental data
DCDC r1
DCDC
DCM
Vehicle
Aircraft
SCOTS
DCDC r2
LGA
A-SR
#inputs
#Bytes
#Bytes
LA
Time
#Bytes
Time
Fit %
20
57
112
49
169
441
729
1087
2001
10001
20001
30001
40001
50001
2
45
89
134
178
223
2
45
89
134
178
223
2
45
89
134
178
223
2878481
9563407
8533274
21972
28537
54692
52447
60757
4951
11957
24206
19161
13772
12921
4532
5218
5350
5272
5266
5300
4247
6009
5615
5768
5781
5714
2243
3685
3638
3565
3531
3549
150459
193590
236753
10462
11956
19430
18435
18939
830
1000
1166
1306
1308
1252
786
1025
1030
1036
1036
1037
773
915
921
936
936
936
791
934
939
949
949
950
121.81
159.61
183.62
1.38
1.79
2.86
3.41
4.04
2.04
13.3
34.65
63.45
94.00
143.13
0.75
1.57
2.38
3.31
4.11
5.09
0.78
1.48
2.15
2.96
3.64
4.48
0.73
2.15
3.66
4.98
6.43
8.13
150316
193055
235273
9821
11047
17357
15793
16338
371
420
410
441
449
448
786
1025
1030
1035
1035
1036
773
915
921
930
930
930
828
937
943
949
949
950
1065, 50
1547, 92
1949, 12
572, 77
614, 85
770, 81
954, 53
1455, 87
458, 61
639, 11
742, 10
951, 10
975, 50
1121, 98
431, 15
440, 99
351, 11
450, 36
368, 17
426, 01
448, 00
417, 70
422, 11
359, 65
409, 91
428, 49
439, 04
428, 78
395, 83
361, 49
456, 36
408.70
48.56
43.55
40.58
32.31
27.15
13.96
18.14
24.82
33.14
33.14
24.43
33.14
19.82
33.14
94.19
94.19
94.18
94.17
94.15
93.55
97.35
97.35
97.35
97.35
97.35
95.13
95.08
94.51
95.12
94.99
94.82
92.91
16
M-SR
10
Deviation
Average
Compression deltas
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
GA v.s. LA
LGA v.s. LA
BLGA v.s. LA
A-SR v.s. LGA
M-SR v.s. LGA
Figure 5: Plotting ∆νGA,LA , ∆νLGA,LA , ∆νBLGA,LA , ∆νA-SR,LGA , ∆νM-SR,LGA
Deviation
Average
1.4
600
1.3
356
1.2
182
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
7
0.6
GA v.s. LA
LGA v.s. LA
BLGA v.s. LA
Figure 6: Execution times ratio relative to LA
17
A-SR v.s. LA
0.35
Distribution
100
Deviation
Average
84.79
80
0.3
0.25
Compression
Probability
60
0.2
0.15
40
0.1
13.79
0.05
0
-5.46
0
0)
-1
5,
[-1
)
-5
0,
[-1
)
,0
[-5
]
,0
[0
]
,5
(0
0]
,1
(5
5]
,1
0
(1
5,
(1
]
20
]
25
0,
(2
]
30
5,
(2
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
0,
5,
0,
5,
0,
5,
0,
5,
0,
5,
0,
5,
(3
(4
(4
(5
(5
(6
(6
(7
(7
(8
(8
(3
Compression ranges
-20
LGA
ν
Figure 7: CLGA,
LA distribution, deviation and average
is sub-optimal due to only considering controller’s local properties. A global
approach (GA), based on the minimum set cover problem solution algorithm,
was proposed to remedy this. Further, a hybrid of GA and LA, called LGA,
was suggested to incorporate the strengths of both approaches. To exploit
the clustering of internal BDD indexes, we have come up with a BDD-index
based version of LGA, called BLGA. Finally, we made an attempt of substituting
the BDD-based control-law representations by functions generated using the
symbolic regression (genetic-algorithm powered) approach, we refer to as SR.
All of the devised approaches were compared in compressing power and runtime by means of an extended empirical evaluation. The compression ranking
of the algorithms turns out to be: 1. LGA, 2. BLGA, 3. LA, 4. GA, 5. SR. The run
times of LA, GA, LGA, and BLGA are of the same order but SR is at least one to
two orders of magnitude slower.
In principle, SR could allow us to eliminate BDDs completely, leading to
potentially smaller functional expressions and prevent using BDD-data accessing
code that, as for CUDD, is difficult (and size expensive) to port to embedded
hardware. We did not manage to achieve that due to: (i) our SR realization
not being powerful enough, see low fitness values in Table 3; (ii) using BDDs
for storing the controller’s support, due to a decision to preserve controller’s
domain. For now, we shall note that SR still looks promising for getting small
and practical controllers. However, symbolic controllers seem to have structure
that is not easy for SR to achieve a 100% fitness on. So more research is needed
to be done in this direction.
18
References
[1] R. Iris Bahar, Erica A. Frohm, Charles M. Gaona, Gary D. Hachtel, Enrico
Macii, Abelardo Pardo, and Fabio Somenzi. Algebraic decision diagrams
and their applications. In Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/ACM International
Conference on Computer-aided Design, ICCAD ’93, pages 188–191, Los
Alamitos, CA, USA, 1993. IEEE Computer Society Press.
[2] S. K. Basu. Non-deterministic Algorithms, page 133. PHI Learning Private
Limited, New Delhi, India, 2008.
[3] Beate Bollig and Ingo Wegener. Improving the variable ordering of obdds
is np-complete. IEEE Trans. Comput., 45(9):993–1002, September 1996.
[4] Randal E. Bryant. Graph-based algorithms for boolean function manipulation. IEEE Trans. Comput., 35(8):677–691, August 1986.
[5] V. Chvatal. A greedy heuristic for the set-covering problem. Mathematics
of Operations Research, 4(3):233–235, 1979.
[6] Thomas H. Cormen, Clifford Stein, Ronald L. Rivest, and Charles E. Leiserson. Introduction to Algorithms. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2nd
edition, 2001.
[7] Cameron Finucane, Gangyuan Jing, and Hadas Kress-Gazit. Ltlmop: Experimenting with language, temporal logic and robot control. In IEEE/RSJ
Int’l. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1988 – 1993, Taipei,
Taiwan, October 2010.
[8] Antoine Girard. Controller synthesis for safety and reachability via approximate bisimulation. Automatica, 48(5):947 – 953, 2012.
[9] Antoine Girard. Low-complexity switching controllers for safety using symbolic models*. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45(9):82 – 87, 2012.
[10] Nikolaus Hansen and Andreas Ostermeier. Completely derandomized selfadaptation in evolution strategies. Evol. Comput., 9(2):159–195, June 2001.
[11] Wolfram Research, Inc. Mathematica, Version 11.1, 2017. Champaign, IL.
[12] Richard M. Karp. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In Raymond E. Miller and James W. Thatcher, editors, Proceedings of a symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations, held March 20-22,
1972, at the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights,
New York., The IBM Research Symposia Series, pages 85–103. Plenum
Press, New York, 1972.
[13] John R. Koza. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers
by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992.
19
[14] John R. Koza. Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection. Statistics and Computing, 4(2):87–112, 1994.
[15] Marta Kwiatkowska, Gethin Norman, and David Parker. Symmetry Reduction for Probabilistic Model Checking, pages 234–248. Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.
[16] Ming Li and Paul M.B. Vitnyi. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 3
edition, 2008.
[17] Jun Liu, Necmiye Ozay, Ufuk Topcu, and Richard M. Murray. Synthesis
of reactive switching protocols from temporal logic specifications. IEEE
Trans. Automat. Contr., 58(7):1771–1785, 2013.
[18] Manuel Mazo, Anna Davitian, and Paulo Tabuada. PESSOA: A Tool for
Embedded Controller Synthesis, pages 566–569. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
[19] Sebti Mouelhi, Antoine Girard, and Gregor Gössler. Cosyma: A tool for
controller synthesis using multi-scale abstractions. In Proceedings of the
16th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC ’13, pages 83–88, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
[20] Gunther Reissig, Alexander Weber, and Matthias Rungger. Feedback Refinement Relations for the Synthesis of Symbolic Controllers. IEEE Trans.
Automat. Control, 62(4):1781–1796, apr 2016.
[21] Raymond Ros and Nikolaus Hansen. A simple modification in cma-es
achieving linear time and space complexity. In Parallel Problem Solving
from Nature – PPSN X: 10th International Conference, Dortmund, Germany, September 13-17, 2008. Proceedings, pages 296–305, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[22] Richard Rudell. Dynamic variable ordering for ordered binary decision
diagrams. In Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/ACM International Conference
on Computer-aided Design, ICCAD ’93, pages 42–47, Los Alamitos, CA,
USA, 1993. IEEE Computer Society Press.
[23] Matthias Rungger, Manuel Mazo, Jr., and Paulo Tabuada. Specificationguided controller synthesis for linear systems and safe linear-time temporal
logic. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC ’13, pages 333–342, New York, NY,
USA, 2013. ACM.
[24] Matthias Rungger and Majid Zamani. SCOTS: A tool for the synthesis of
symbolic controllers. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference
on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC, pages 99–104, 2016.
20
[25] Christoph Scholl, Bernd Becker, and Andreas Brogle. Solving the multiple variable order problem for binary decision diagrams by use of dynamic reordering techniques. Technical report, Albert-Ludwigs-University,
Freiburg, D 79110 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, 1999.
[26] Fabio Somenzi. CUDD: CU Decision Diagram Package, 2015. Electronically
available at: http://vlsi.colorado.edu/~fabio/CUDD/.
[27] V. Staudt. Compact representation of mathematical functions for control
applications by piecewise linear approximations. Electrical Engineering,
81(3):129–134, 1998.
[28] Paulo Tabuada. Verification and Control of Hybrid Systems: A Symbolic
Approach. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1st edition, 2009.
[29] C.F. Verdier and M. Mazo. Formal controller synthesis via genetic programming. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2017. (To Appear).
[30] Peter A Whigham et al. Grammatically-based genetic programming. In The
workshop on genetic programming: from theory to real-world applications,
pages 33–41, 1995.
[31] M. J. Willis, H. G. Hiden, P. Marenbach, B. McKay, and G. A. Montague.
Genetic programming: an introduction and survey of applications. In International Conference On Genetic Algorithms In Engineering Systems:
Innovations And Applications, pages 314–319, Sep 1997.
[32] Tichakorn Wongpiromsarn, Ufuk Topcu, Necmiye Ozay, Huan Xu, and
Richard M. Murray. Tulip: A software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference
on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC ’11, pages 313–314,
New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[33] Majid Zamani, Giordano Pola, Manuel Mazo Jr., and Paulo Tabuada. Symbolic models for nonlinear control systems without stability assumptions.
IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 57(7):1804–1809, 2012.
21
| 3cs.SY
|
June 7, 2017
CANONICAL CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS OF HIGH-DIMENSIONAL
GAUSSIAN VECTORS: FINITE RANK CASE
By Zhigang Bao∗ , Jiang Hu† , Guangming Pan‡ and Wang Zhou§
arXiv:1704.02408v3 [math.ST] 6 Jun 2017
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Northeast Normal University
Nanyang Technological University
and National University of Singapore
Consider a Gaussian vector z = (x0 , y0 )0 , consisting of two subvectors x and y with dimensions p and q respectively. With n independent observations of z, we study the correlation between x
and y, from the perspective of the Canonical Correlation Analysis.
We investigate the high-dimensional case: both p and q are proportional to the sample size n. Denote by Σuv the population crosscovariance matrix of random vectors u and v, and denote by Suv the
sample counterpart. The canonical correlation coefficients between
x and y are known as the square roots of the nonzero eigenvalues
−1
of the canonical correlation matrix Σ−1
xx Σxy Σyy Σyx . In this paper,
we focus on the case that Σxy is of finite rank k, i.e. there are
k nonzero canonical correlation coefficients, whose squares are denoted by r1 ≥ · · · ≥ rk > 0. We study the sample counterparts of
ri , i = 1, . . . , k, i.e. the largest k eigenvalues of the sample canon−1
−1
ical correlation matrix Sxx
Sxy Syy
Syx , denoted by λ1 ≥ · · · ≥ λk .
We show that there exists a threshold rc ∈ (0, 1), such that for each
i ∈ {1, . . . , k}, when ri ≤ rc , λi converges almost surely to the right
edge of the limiting spectral distribution of the sample canonical correlation matrix, denoted by d+ . When ri > rc , λi possesses an almost
sure limit in (d+ , 1], from which we can recover ri ’s in turn, thus provide an estimate of the latter in the high-dimensional scenario. We
also obtain the limiting distribution of λi ’s under appropriate normalization. Specifically, λi possesses Gaussian type fluctuation if ri > rc ,
and follows Tracy-Widom distribution if ri < rc . Some applications
of our results are also discussed.
1. Introduction. In multivariate analysis, the most general and favorable method to investigate the relationship between two random vectors x and y, is the Canonical Correlation
Analysis (CCA), which was raised in the seminal work of Hotelling [27]. CCA aims at finding
two sets of basis vectors, such that the correlations between the projections of the variables x
and y onto these basis vectors are mutually maximized, namely, seeking vectors a = a1 and
b = b1 to maximize the correlation coefficient
Cov(a0 x, b0 y)
p
ρ ≡ ρ(a, b) := p
.
Var(a0 x) · Var(b0 y)
(1.1)
Conventionally, ρ1 := ρ(a1 , b1 ) is called the first canonical correlation coefficient. Having obtained the first m canonical correlation coefficients ρi , i = 1, . . . , m and the corresponding vector
∗
Z.G. Bao was supported by a startup fund from HKUST
J. Hu was partially supported by CNSF 11301063
‡
G.M. Pan was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under grant # ARC 14/11
§
W. Zhou was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under grant MOE2015-T2-2039(R-155-000-171-112).
MSC 2010 subject classifications: 62H20, 60B20,60F99
Keywords and phrases: Canonical correlation analysis, Random Matrices, MANOVA ensemble, Highdimensional data, finite rank perturbation, largest eigenvalues
†
1
2
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
pairs (ai , bi ), i = 1 . . . , m, one can proceed to seek vectors (am+1 , bm+1 ) maximizing ρ subject
to the constraint that (a0m+1 x, b0m+1 y) is uncorrelated with (a0i x, b0i y) for all i = 1, . . . , m. Analogously, we call ρi the ith canonical correlation coefficient if it is nonzero. Denoting by Σuv the
population cross-covariance matrix of arbitrary two random vectors u and v, it is well known
that ri := ρ2i is the ith largest eigenvalue of the (population) canonical correlation matrix
−1
Σ−1
xx Σxy Σyy Σyx .
Let zi = (x0i , yi0 )0 , i = 1, . . . , n be n independent observations of the vector z := (x0 , y0 )0 ∼
N (µ, Σ) with mean vector µ and covariance matrix
Σxx Σxy
Σ=
,
Σyx Σyy
We can study the canonical correlation coefficients via their sample counterparts. To be specific,
we employ the notation Suv to represent the sample cross-covariance matrix for arbitrary two
random vectors u and v, where the implicit sample size of (u0 , v0 )0 is assumed to be n, henceforth.
Then the square of the ith sample canonical correlation coefficient is defined as the ith largest
eigenvalue of the sample canonical correlation matrix (CCA matrix in short)
−1
−1
Sxx
Sxy Syy
Syx ,
denoted by λi in the sequel.
Let p and q be the dimensions of the sub-vectors x and y, respectively. In the classical
low-dimensional setting, i.e., both p and q are fixed but n is large, one can safely use λi to
estimate ri , considering the convergence of the sample cross-covariance matrices towards their
population counterparts. However, nowadays, due to the increasing demand in the analysis of
high-dimensional data springing up in various fields such as genomics, signal processing, microarray, finance and proteomics, putting forward a theory on high-dimensional CCA is much
needed. So far, there are only a handful of works devoted to this topic. Fujikoshi in [20] derived
the asymptotic distributions of the canonical correlation coefficients when q is fixed while p is
proportional to n. Oda et al. in [39] considered the problem of testing for redundancy in high
dimensional canonical correlation analysis. Recently, with certain sparsity assumption, the theoretical results and potential applications of high-dimensional sparse CCA have been discussed
in [23, 22]. In the null case, i.e., x and y are independent, the Tracy-Widom law for the largest
canonical correlation coefficients has been studied in [32, 26, 25], when p, q, n are proportional.
Recently, in [34] Johnstone and Onatski derived the asymptotics of the likelihood ratio processes
of CCA corresponding to the null hypothesis of no spikes and the alternative of a single spike.
In this paper, we will work with the following high-dimensional setting.
Assumption 1.1 (On the dimensions).
p/n = c1 → y1 ∈ (0, 1),
We assume that p := p(n), q := q(n), and
q/n = c2 → y2 ∈ (0, 1),
as
n → ∞,
s.t.
y1 + y2 ∈ (0, 1).
Without loss of generality, we always work with the additional assumption
p > q,
thus
c1 > c2 .
Observe that here y1 and y2 are asymptotic parameters, while c1 and c2 are non-asymptotic
parameters. Hence, in general, a c1 , c2 -dependent random variable X(c1 , c2 ) can not serve as a
limiting target of a random sequence Xn (c1 , c2 ), n ≥ 1. Nevertheless, to ease the presentation,
from time to time, we still write Xn (c1 , c2 ) → X(c1 , c2 ), if Xn (c1 , c2 ) − X(c1 , c2 ) → 0, where the
convergence could be in distribution, in probability or a.s., etc.
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
3
Let x̄ and ȳ be the sample means of n samples {xi }ni=1 and {yi }ni=1 respectively, and use the
notation x̊i := xi − x̄ and ẙi := yi − ȳ for i = 1, . . . , n. We can then write
n
Sab =
1 X
åi b̊0i ,
n−1
a, b = x or y
i=1
It is well known that there exist n − 1 i.i.d. Gaussian vectors z̃i = (x̃0i , ỹi0 )0 ∼ N (0, Σ), such that
n−1
Sab =
1 X
ãi b̃0i ,
n−1
a, b = x or y.
i=1
For simplicity, we recycle the notation xi and yi to replace x̃i and ỹi , and work with n instead
of n − 1, noticing that such a replacement on sample size is harmless to Assumption 1.1. Hence,
we can and do assume that z is centered in the sequel and denote
n
Sab
1X
=
ai b0i ,
n
a, b = x or y.
i=1
Furthermore, for brevity, we introduce the notation
−1
−1
Cxy := Sxx
Sxy Syy
Syx ,
(1.2)
for the CCA matrix, and Cyx can be analogously defined via switching the roles of x and y in
(1.2). Notice that Cxy and Cyx possess the same non-zero eigenvalues.
By our assumption p > q, there are at most q non-zero canonical correlations, either population ones or sample ones. An elementary fact is that λi , ri ∈ [0, 1] for all i = 1, . . . , q. Note that
λi , i = 1, . . . , q are also eigenvalues of the q × q matrix Cyx , whose empirical spectral distribution
(ESD) will be denoted by
q
1X
Fn (x) :=
1{λi ≤x} .
q
(1.3)
i=1
We use the following notations for the data matrices
X := Xn = (x1 , . . . , xn ),
Y := Yn = (y1 , . . . , yn ).
Let vec(X ) = (x01 , . . . , x0n )0 be the vectorization of the matrix X , and define vec(Y ) be the
analogously. We see that vec(X ) ∼ N (0, In ⊗ Σxx ) and vec(Y ) ∼ N (0, In ⊗ Σyy ). Our aim,
in this work,√is to study the asymptotic behavior of a few largest sample canonical correlation
√
coefficients λi ’s, and try to get the information about the population ones ρi = ri from the
sample ones. We will focus on the case of finite rank, i.e., there is some fixed nonnegative integer
k, such that
r1 ≥ . . . ≥ rk ≥ rk+1 = . . . = rq = 0.
Specifically, we make the following assumption throughout the work.
Assumption 1.2 (On the rank of the population matrix). We assume that rank(Σxy ) ≤ k
for some fixed positive integer k. Furthermore, setting r0 = 1, we denote by k0 the nonnegative
integer satisfying
1 = r0 ≥ . . . ≥ rk0 > rc ≥ rk0 +1 ≥ . . . rk ≥ rk+1 = 0,
(1.4)
where
rc ≡ rc (c1 , c2 ) :=
r
c1 c2
.
(1 − c1 )(1 − c2 )
(1.5)
In Section 1.2 we will state our main results. Before that, we introduce in Section 1.1 some
known results in the null case, i.e. k = 0, which will be the starting point of our discussion.
4
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
1.1. The null case: MANOVA ensemble. At first, we introduce some known results on the
limiting behavior of {λi }qi=1 in the null case, i.e. x and y are independent, or else, ri = 0 for
all i = 1, . . . , q. It is elementary to see that the canonical correlation coefficients are invariant
under the block diagonal transformation (xi , yi ) → (Axi , Byi ), for any p × p matrix A and q × q
matrix B, as long as both of them are nonsingular. Hence, without loss of generality, in this
section, we tentatively assume that Σxx = Ip and Σyy = Iq . Under our high-dimensional setting,
i.e. Assumption 1.1, it is known that λi ’s do not converge to 0 even in the null case, instead,
they typically spread out over an interval contained in [0, 1]. Specifically, we have the following
theorem on Fn (x) (c.f. (1.3)), which is essentially due to Wachter [45].
Theorem 1.3. When x and y are independent Gaussian and Assumption 1.1 holds, almost
surely, Fn converges weakly to a deterministic probability distribution F (x) with density
p
(d+ − x)(x − d− )
1
f (x) =
1(d− ≤ x ≤ d+ ),
(1.6)
2πc2
x(1 − x)
where
d± =
p
c1 (1 − c2 ) ±
p
2
c2 (1 − c1 )
(1.7)
Remark 1.4. In the null case, the convergence of the ESD of the CCA matrix actually holds
under a more general distribution assumption, see [48].
Conventionally, we call F (x) in Theorem 1.3 the limiting spectral distribution (LSD) of Cyx .
One might note that F (x) is also the LSD of the so-called MANOVA ensemble with appropriately
chosen parameters, which is widely studied in the Random Matrix Theory (RMT). Actually,
when x and y are Gaussian and independent, the CCA matrix Cyx is exactly a MANOVA
matrix. To see this, we note that Px := X 0 (X X 0 )−1 X is a projection matrix independent of
Y . Hence, we can write
Cyx = (Y (I − Px )Y 0 + Y Px Y 0 )−1 Y Px Y 0 .
Using Cochran’s theorem, we see that Y (I − Py )Y 0 and Y Px Y 0 are independent Wishart,
Y (I − Px )Y 0 ∼ Wq (Iq , n − p),
Y Px Y 0 ∼ Wq (Iq , p).
Hereafter, we use the notation Wm (·, ·) to denote the Wishart distribution Wishartm (·, ·) for
short. Consequently, λi , i = 1, . . . , q are known to possess the following joint density function,
pn (λ1 , . . . , λq ) = Cn
q
Y
i<j
|λi − λj |
q
Y
(p−q−1)/2
(1 − λi )(n−p−q−1)/2 λi
1(λi ∈ [0, 1]),
i=1
where Cn is the normalizing constant, see Muirhead [38], page 112, for instance. Or else, one can
refer to [32], for more related discussions. In the context of RMT, the point process possessing
the above joint density is also called Jacobi ensemble.
Throughout the paper, we will say that an n-dependent event A ≡ A(n) holds with overwhelming probability, if for any given positive number `, there exists a constant C` such that
P(A) ≥ 1 − C` n−` .
K
Especially, for any fixed integer K ≥ 0, we have ∩ni=1 Ai holds with overwhelming probability
if Ai holds with overwhelming probability individually with the common C` ’s. The next known
result concerns the convergence of the largest eigenvalues.
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
Theorem 1.5.
5
When x and y are independent and Assumption 1.1 holds, we have
a.s.
λi − d+ −→ 0,
(1.8)
for any fixed positive integer i. Moreover, for any small constant ε > 0,
λ1 ≤ d+ + ε
(1.9)
holds with overwhelming probability.
Remark 1.6. The estimate (1.9), is actually implied by some existing results in the literature
directly. For example, one can refer to the small deviation estimate of the largest eigenvalue of
the Jacobi ensemble in [36] . Moreover, (1.8) is a direct consequence of (1.9) and Theorem 1.3.
Remark 1.7. As we mentioned in Introduction , on the fluctuation level, λ1 possesses a
Type 1 Tracy-Widom limit after appropriate normalization. Such a result has been established
recently in [32, 26, 25].
1.2. Finite rank case. We now turn to the case we are interested in: the finite rank case. To
wit, Assumption 1.2 holds. It will be clear that the CCA matrix in such a finite rank case can be
viewed as a finite rank perturbation of that in the null case. Consequently, the global behavior,
especially the LSD, turns out to coincide with the null case. However, finite rank perturbation
may significantly alter the behavior of the extreme eigenvalues, when the perturbation is strong
enough. Similar problems have been studied widely for various random matrix models, not trying
to be comprehensive, we refer to the spiked sample covariance matrices [31, 6, 41, 4, 5, 19], the
deformed Wigner matrices [12, 42, 18, 13, 37], the deformed unitarily invariant matrices [9, 35],
and some other deformed models [11, 10, 46]. In this work, for our CCA matrix Cxy , we study the
limits and the fluctuations of its largest eigenvalues, i.e. squares of the largest sample canonical
correlation coefficients, under Assumption 1.2. Our main results are the following three theorems.
Let
γi := ri (1 − c1 + c1 ri−1 )(1 − c2 + c2 ri−1 ).
(1.10)
Recall rc and d+ defined in (1.5) and (1.7), respectively. It is easy to check that γi ≥ d+ if
ri ≥ rc .
Theorem 1.8 (Limits). Under Assumptions 1.1 and 1.2, the squares of the largest canonical
correlation coefficients exhibit the following convergence as n → ∞.
(i): (Outliers) For 1 ≤ i ≤ k0 , we have
a.s.
λi − γi −→ 0.
(ii): (Sticking eigenvalues) For each fixed i ≥ k0 + 1, we have
a.s.
λi − d+ −→ 0.
The next two results are on fluctuations of λi ’s. We need the following definition.
Definition 1.9. For two (possibly) n-dependent numbers a(n), b(n) ∈ C, we say a(n) is well
separated from b(n), if there exists a small positive constant ε such that |a(n) − b(n)| ≥ ε for
sufficiently large n.
The next theorem is on the fluctuations of the outliers.
6
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
Theorem 1.10 (Fluctuations of the outliers). Suppose that Assumptions 1.1 and 1.2 hold.
Let l0 be the cardinality of the set Γ := {r1 , . . . , rk0 } (not counting multiplicity), and denote
by r1 = r(1) > · · · > r(l0 ) = rk0 the l0 different values in Γ. Set n0 = 0 and denote by nl the
Pl
P
multiplicity of r(l) in Γ for 1 ≤ l ≤ l0 . Let Jl = [ l−1
i=0 ni ] ∩ Z for 1 ≤ l ≤ l0 . If r(`)
i=0 ni + 1,
is well separated from rc , 1, r(`−1) and r(`+1) , the nl -dimensional random vector
n √n(λ − γ )
o
j
j
, j ∈ Jl
ξ(rj )
converges weakly to the distribution of the ordered eigenvalues of an nl -dimensional symmetric
Gaussian random matrix G = (gij ) with independent (up to symmetry) entries gij ∼ N (0, 1+δij ).
Here
(1 − rj )2 2(1 − c1 )(1 − c2 )rj + c1 + c2 − 2c1 c2 (1 − c1 )(1 − c2 )rj2 − c1 c2
ξ 2 (rj ) :=
. (1.11)
rj2
Remark 1.11. The assumption that r` is away from rc , 1, r(`−1) and r(`+1) by a constant
distance ε > 0 (well separated) is not necessary. It is possible to reduce ε to some n-dependent
distance n−α for sufficiently small α. But we do not pursue this direction here.
Our last theorem is on the fluctuation of the sticking eigenvalues.
Theorem 1.12 (Fluctuations of the sticking eigenvalues). Suppose that Assumptions 1.1
and 1.2 hold. In addition, we assume that rc is well separated from rk0 and rk0 +1 . There exists
a CCA matrix in the null case with the same parameters p, q, n, whose nonzero eigenvalues are
denoted by λ̊1 > λ̊2 . . . > λ̊q , such that for any fixed positive integer m and any small constant
ε > 0, we have
max |λk0 +i − λ̊i | ≤ n−1+ε
1≤i≤m
(1.12)
in probability. This implies
2
n 3 (λk0 +1 − d+ )
=⇒ F1 ,
ξtw
(1.13)
where F1 is the Type 1 Tracy-Widom distribution and
d2+ (1 − d+ )2
3
ξtw
=p
.
c1 c2 (1 − c1 )(1 − c2 )
Remark 1.13. From (1.12), it is easy to conclude (1.13), by using the Tracy-Widom limit
of λ̊1 derived in [32, 26, 25]. Observe that in these references, the Tracy Widom law is stated
for the logit transform of λ̊1 , i.e., log(λ̊1 /(1 − λ̊1 )). Using a Taylor expansion, it is elementary
2
to check that that n 3 (λ̊1 − d+ )/ξtw =⇒ F1 from the Tracy-Widom law for the logit transform of
λ̊1 (see Theorem 1 and Section 2.1.1.in [32] for more details).
Remark 1.14. Similarly to Remark 1.11, the assumption that rc is away from rk0 and rk0 +1
by a constant distance can be weakened. But we do not pursue this direction here.
To illustrate the result in Theorems 1.8, 1.10 and 1.12, we did some numerical simulations.
The different limiting behavior of λi in (i) and (ii) of Theorem 1.8 can be observed in Figure 1.
The fluctuation for λi in Theorem 1.10 and Theorem 1.12 can be seen from Figures 2 and 1.
7
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0.48
0.5d r
0.52
0.54 γ 3
0.56
0.58
γ 2 0.6
0.62
0.64
0.66 γ 1
0.68
Fig 1. We chose a Gaussian vector z = (x0 , y0 )0 with p = 500 and q = 1000. The sample size is n = 5000. Hence,
c1 = 0.1, c2 = 0.2. Then rc ≈ 0.17 and d+ = 0.5. We chose k = 4 and (r1 , r2 , r3 , r4 ) = (0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.16). Then
γ1 ≈ 0.66, γ2 ≈ 0.6, γ3 ≈ 0.54 and γ4 ≈ 0.50 . The above simulation result is based on 1000 replications. The
abscises of the vertical segments represent d+ and {γ1 , γ2 , γ3 }. The four histograms represent the distributions of
the largest four eigenvalues of the CCA matrix respectively.
1.3. Organization and notations. Our paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we display
some applications of our results. We introduce in Section 3 some necessary preliminaries. In
Section 4, we will reformulate the sample canonical correlation matrix in the finite rank case as
a perturbation of that in the null case, thereby obtaining a determinant equation for the largest
eigenvalues. By solving the limiting counterpart of the determinant equation, we can get the
limits of the largest eigenvalues in Section 5, i.e. prove Theorem 1.8. In Section 6 we derive the
fluctuations of the outliers (Theorem 1.10), and in Section 7, we study the fluctuations of the
sticking eigenvalues (Theorem 1.12). Sections 8 and 9 are then devoted to proving some technical
lemmas used in previous sections.
Throughout the paper, the notation C represents some generic constants whose values which
may vary from line to line. The notation 0k×` is used to denote the k by ` null matrix, which
will be abbreviated to 0k if k = `, and from time to time we also use the abbreviation 0 if the
dimension k × ` is clear from the context. For any matrix A, its (i, j)th entry will be written as
Aij . When A is square, we denote by Spec(A) its spectrum. For a function f : C → C and an
Hermitian matrix A with spectral decomposition UA ΛA U∗A , we define f (A) as usual, in the
sense of functional calculus, to wit, f (A) = UA f (ΛA )U∗A , where f (ΛA ) is the diagonal matrix
obtained via maping the eigenvalues of A to their images under f . We will conventionally use
the notations kAk and kAkHS to represent the operator norm and Hilbert-Schmidt norm of a
matrix A, respectively, while kbk stands for the Euclidean norm of a vector b. Throughout this
paper, we use op (1) to denote a scalar negligible (in probability) or a fixed-dimensional random
matrix with negligible (in probability) entries. And the notations oa.s (1), Op (1) and Oa.s. (1) are
used in a similar way.
For brevity, we further introduce the notations
$ := c1 c2 ,
ϑ := (1 − c1 )(1 − c2 ).
(1.14)
2. Applications. In this section, we discuss three applications of our results Theorems 1.8,
1.10 and 1.12 in hypothesis testing, estimation of the number and the values of the canonical
correlation coefficients (CCC for short). At the end, we present an experiment on a real rain
forest data.
8
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
Fig 2. We chose a Gaussian vector z = (x0 , y0 )0 with p = 500 and q = 1000. The sample size is n = 5000. Hence,
c1 = 0.1, c2 = 0.2. Then rc ≈ 0.17 and d+ = 0.5. We chose k = 4 and (r1 , r2 , r3 , r4 ) = (0.5, 0.4, 0.4, 0.16). Then
γ1 ≈ 0.66 and γ2 = γ3 ≈ 0.6. This result is based on 1000 replications. The upper panel shows that the frequency
histogram of λ1 compared to its Gaussian limits (dashed lines). The lower panels show that the contour plots of
empirical joint density function of λ2 and λ3 (left plot, after centralisation and scaling) and contour plots of their
limits (right plot). The empirical joint density function is displayed by using the two-dimensional kernel density
estimates.
2.1. Application 1: Power of testing for the independence of two high dimensional normal
vectors. Testing for the independence of random vectors is a very classical problem. For two
normal random vectors x and y with dimensions p and q respectively, we consider the test
H0 : Σxy = 0p×q
v.s.
H1 : not H0 .
Currently, for high dimensional cases, there are three kinds of widely discussed test procedures:
(i) Corrected likelihood ratio tests (see [29, 30]); (ii) Trace tests (see [29, 49, 28, 47, 8]); (iii)
Largest eigenvalue tests (see [32, 33, 26]). It has been shown by numerical results in [8, 26] that
if Σxy is sparse, the corrected likelihood ratio tests and trace tests fail and the largest eigenvalue
tests works well. In the following, we propose a statistic based on the CCC of x and y, and show
that it is powerful against finite rank case. It is well known that testing for the independence of
two high dimensional normal vectors equals to testing their first canonical correlation coefficient
being zero or not, i.e.,
H0 : r1 = 0
v.s. H1 : r1 > 0.
Therefore, a natural test statistic is the first eigenvalue λ1 of the sample canonical correlation
matrix Cxy . Then according to Section 2.1.1.in [32] and Theorem 2.1 in [26], under the null
hypothesis and Assumption 1.1 we have
n2/3 (λ1 − d+ )
=⇒ F1 .
ξtw
(2.1)
λ1 > n−2/3 qα ξtw + d+ ,
(2.2)
Therefore, we reject H0 if
where qα is the 1 − α quantile of Tracy-Widom distribution F1 . If the sample is under the
Assumption 1.2 and r1 > rc , then this test will be able to detect the alternative hypothesis with
a power tending to one as the dimension tends to infinity.
9
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
Theorem 2.1 (Power function). Suppose that the assumptions in Theorems 1.10 and 1.12
hold with r1 > rc . Then as n → ∞, the power function of the test procedure (2.2)
!
√
√
n(λ1 − γ1 )
n−1/6 qα ξtw
n(d+ − γ1 )
→ 1.
P ower = P
>
+
ξ(r1 )
ξ(r1 )
ξ(r1 )
−1/6
Proof. Under the conditions in Theorems 1.10 and 1.12, for any α, we have n ξ(rq1α)ξtw → 0.
From the√conclusion of Theorem 1.8 and r1 > rc , we have limn→∞ (d√+ − γ1 ) < 0, which implies
+ −γ1 )
1 −γ1 )
limn→∞ n(d
→ −∞. In addition, by applying Theorem 1.10, n(λ
converges weakly
ξ(r1 )
ξ(r1 )
to the distribution of the largest eigenvalue of a symmetric Gaussian random matrix. Therefore,
combining the above results, we then complete the proof of Theorem 2.1.
2.2. Application 2: Estimating the number of the population CCC. As a fundamental problems in CCA, the estimation of the number and the values of the population CCC are widely
investigated. In this subsection, we first apply our results to determine the number of the outliers
of high dimensional population CCC (not counting multiplicity). Actually, due to the threshold
√
in our results, we cannot detect the population CCC which are smaller than rc . To the best
of our knowledge, there is no effective method in general to successfully detect the population
spikes below the threshold when the dimension is large, even for the simpler spike PCA problem.
The reason can be find in the recent work [3] for instance.
We propose our estimator of the number of the outliers of population CCC k0 by the number
of eigenvalues of the sample canonical correlation matrix which are larger than d+ :
k̂0 := max{i : λi ≥ d+ + n },
(2.3)
√
where n is a sequence of positive number only depending on n and satisfying n n → 0 and
n n2/3 → ∞. Then the estimator k̂0 is weakly consistent according to the following theorem.
Theorem 2.2 (Weak consistency of k̂0 ). Suppose that the assumptions in Theorems 1.10
and 1.12 hold. As n → ∞, the estimator k̂0 in (2.3) is weakly consistent for the number of the
outliers of population CCC k0 , that is
P(k̂0 = k0 ) → 1.
(2.4)
Proof. According to the definition of k̂0 in (2.3), we have that
P(k̂0 = k0 ) =P λk0 ≥ d+ + n , λk0 +1 < d+ + n
≥1 − P(λk0 < d+ + n ) − P(λk0 +1 ≥ d+ + n ).
√
By Theorem 1.10 and n n → 0, we obtain that
√
√
P(λk0 < d+ + n ) = P n(λk0 − γk0 ) < n(d+ − γk0 + n ) → 0.
(2.5)
(2.6)
Analogously, from Theorem 1.12 and n n2/3 → ∞, we also have
P(λk0 +1 ≥ d+ + n ) = P n2/3 (λk0 +1 − d+ ) ≥ n2/3 n → 0,
which together with (2.5) and (2.6) implies (2.4). Therefore, we complete the proof.
√
Remark 2.3. Although in theory, any sequence n which satisfies the conditions n n → 0
and n n2/3 → ∞ is applicable, we have to choose one in practice. Thus, it is worth to notice that
the smaller n one chooses, the easier one overestimates k0 and vice versa. In the simulation,
based on the idea in the paper [40, 46], we choose n to be log log(n)/n2/3 , which makes our
estimator conservative.
10
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
In the following, we report a short simulation result to illustrate the performance of our
estimator. For comparison, we also show the result of other three estimators in [21] by using the
following model selection criteria: AIC, BIC and Cp respectively, which are
k̂A = arg min AICj ,
k̂B = arg min BICj ,
k̂C = arg min CPj .
j∈{0,1,...,q}
j∈{0,1,...,q}
j∈{0,1,...,q}
Here for j ∈ {1, . . . , q},
AICj = −n log
q
h Y
i
(1 − λi ) − 2(p − j)(q − j),
i=j+1
BICj = −n log
q
h Y
i
(1 − λi ) − log(n)(p − j)(q − j),
i=j+1
CPj = n
q
X
i=j+1
λi
− 2(p − j)(q − j)
1 − λi
and AIC0 = BIC0 = CP0 = 0.
According to the results in Table 1 and Table 2, we can find that the performance of our
estimator is much better than AIC, BIC and Cp estimators when the dimensions are big. If
the dimensions are small and the sample size is big enough, then besides our estimator, the
AIC and Cp estimators perform well, but BIC estimator performs badly. That coincides with
the conclusion in [21], which showed if q is fixed and p/n → c1 > 0 but small, AIC and Cp
estimators are weakly consistent but BIC estimator is not.
p=10, rc = 0.0071
p=60, rc = 0.0445
p=110, rc = 0.0854
k̂0
k̂A
k̂B
k̂C
k̂0
k̂A
k̂B
k̂C
k̂0
k̂A
k̂B
k̂C
≤2
0
0
0
0
0
0
375
0
0
0
1000
0
3
0
0
0
0
90
0
625
0
95
0
0
0
4
1000
937
1000
935
1000
846
0
463
905
488
0
0
5
0
63
0
65
0
151
0
465
0
458
0
26
≥6
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
72
0
54
0
974
p=160, rc = 0.1305
p=210, rc = 0.1809
p=260, rc = 0.2379
≤2
0
0
1000
0
0
0
1000
0
61
0
1000
0
3
714
0
0
0
27
0
0
0
939
0
0
0
4
286
62
0
0
793
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
349
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
≥6
0
589
0
1000
0
999
0
1000
0
1000
0
1000
Table 1
We fix (r1 , r2 , r3 , r4 ) = (0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2), r5 = · · · rq = 0, p/q = 2, n = 1000, and let {p, q} vary. The results are
obtained based on 1000 replications with centered normal distributions. The tuning parameter n is chosen to be
log log(n)/n2/3 . We present the counting numbers of AIC, BIC, Cp estimators proposed in [21] and our
estimator which are equal to the values in the first column. The correct numbers for the estimators are marked
bold. Notice that as rc changes along with {p, q}, the true value of k0 are different.
2.3. Application 3: Estimating the values of the population CCC. As a measure to detect
the correlation level between two random vectors, the population CCC are also important.
Traditionally, one uses the sample CCC to estimate the population ones directly, since under
11
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
p=10, q = 5, n = 100
p=60, q = 30, n = 600
p=110, q = 55, n = 1100
k̂0
k̂A
k̂B
k̂C
k̂0
k̂A
k̂B
k̂C
k̂0
k̂A
k̂B
k̂C
≤2
44
0
88
0
0
0
1000
0
0
0
1000
0
3
877
65
732
39
186
2
0
0
22
0
0
0
4
79
871
180
876
814
744
0
118
978
559
0
2
5
0
64
0
85
0
238
0
525
0
400
0
51
≥6
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
357
0
41
0
947
p=160, q = 80, n = 1600
p=210, q = 105, n = 2100
p=260, q = 130, n = 2600
≤2
0
0
1000
0
0
0
1000
0
0
0
1000
0
3
6
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
994
426
0
0
1000
289
0
0
1000
188
0
0
5
0
482
0
0
0
547
0
0
0
546
0
0
≥6
0
92
0
1000
0
164
0
1000
0
266
0
1000
Table 2
We fix (r1 , r2 , r3 , r4 ) = (0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2), r5 = · · · rq = 0, c1 = 0.1, c2 = 0.05, rc = 0.077, k0 = 4, and let {p, q, n}
change. The results are obtained based on 1000 replications with centered normal distributions. The tuning
parameter n is chosen to be log log(n)/n2/3 . We present the counting numbers of AIC, BIC, Cp estimators
proposed in [21] and our estimator which are equal to the values in the first column. The correct numbers are
marked bold.
the traditional assumption that p, q are fixed and n → ∞, the sample CCC tend to the population
ones almost surely (see Chapter 12 in [1]). However, it has been noticed that sample CCC suffer
from inflation, which occurs when the number of observations is not sufficient (see [43, 15, 50]).
But the good news is that now we can easily explain the reason of the inflation properties of the
sample CCC by our Theorem 1.8. In this subsection, we will give an approach to estimate the
√
population CCC which are bigger than rc .
Solving the equation (1.10) via replacing γi by λi , we have two solutions
p
2c1 c2 − c1 − c2 + λi ± (λi − d− )(λi − d+ )
r̂i :=
.
(2.7)
2(c1 c2 − c1 − c2 + 1)
Notice that the product of two solutions equals to c1 c2 /[(1 − c1 )(1 − c2 )] = rc2 . Therefore,
according to the fact that λi > d+ and r̂i → ri > rc when n → ∞, we should choose a plus sign
in (2.7). Hence, the estimator of ri is chosen to be
p
2c1 c2 − c1 − c2 + λi + (λi − d− )(λi − d+ )
r̂i := φ(λi ) =
,
(2.8)
2(c1 c2 − c1 − c2 + 1)
Then according to Theorem 1.8, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 2.4.
almost surely
Under the same conditions of Theorem 1.8, for any 1 ≤ i ≤ k0 , we have
r̂i → ri .
Next, we display a short simulation result in Table 3 and Table 4, which are the sample
means and standard deviations (s.d.) of the estimators r̂i . In the simulation, we first estimate
k0 by (2.3) with the tuning parameter n = log log(n)/n2/3 , and then for i ≤ k̂0 , we obtain the
estimators r̂i by (2.8). According to the results we find that our estimator is excellent, especially
when the population CCC are not equal to each other. If the multiplicity of some CCC is bigger
12
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
r̂1
r̂2
r̂3
r̂4
mean
s.d.
mean
s.d.
mean
s.d.
mean
s.d.
p=10, q = 5, n = 100
0.798
0.036
0.588
0.066
0.362
0.072
0.241
0.033
p=60, q = 30, n = 600
0.800
0.016
0.598
0.027
0.392
0.035
0.190
0.029
p=110, q = 55, n = 1100
0.799
0.012
0.599
0.020
0.397
0.025
0.189
0.026
p=160, q = 80, n = 1600
0.800
0.010
0.598
0.017
0.397
0.020
0.191
0.023
p=210, q = 105, n = 2100
0.800
0.008
0.600
0.014
0.397
0.019
0.194
0.020
p=260, q = 130, n = 2600
0.800
0.008 0.599 0.013 0.399 0.017 0.194 0.018
Table 3
We fix (r1 , r2 , r3 , r4 ) = (0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2), r5 = · · · rq = 0, c1 = 0.1, c2 = 0.05, rc = 0.077, k0 = 4, and let {p, q, n}
vary. The results are obtained based on 1000 replications with centered normal distributions. The tuning
parameter n is chosen to be log log(n)/n2/3 .
r̂1
r̂2
r̂3
r̂4
mean
s.d.
mean
s.d.
mean
s.d.
mean
s.d.
p=10, q = 5, n = 100
0.800
0.037
0.594
0.061
0.409
0.066
0.288
0.051
p=60, q = 30, n = 600
0.799
0.015
0.599
0.027
0.419
0.029
0.356
0.031
p=110, q = 55, n = 1100
0.799
0.011
0.599
0.020
0.417
0.021
0.370
0.021
p=160, q = 80, n = 1600
0.800
0.010
0.600
0.015
0.415
0.018
0.376
0.018
p=210, q = 105, n = 2100
0.800
0.008
0.600
0.014
0.413
0.015
0.381
0.016
p=260, q = 130, n = 2600
0.800
0.007 0.600 0.014 0.412 0.014 0.383 0.015
Table 4
We fix (r1 , r2 , r3 , r4 ) = (0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.4), r5 = · · · rq = 0, c1 = 0.1, c2 = 0.05, rc = 0.077, k0 = 4, and let {p, q, n}
vary. The results are obtained based on 1000 replications with centered normal distributions. The tuning
parameter n is chosen to be log log(n)/n2/3 .
13
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
than one, as the results shown in Table 4, there should be some r̂i ’s close to each other. In this
case, although ri = ri+1 for certain multiple population CCC, the estimator r̂i may differ from
r̂i+1 by a certain amount since our λi ’s are ordered. Suppose now we can determine ri = ri+1
from the information in the CCA matrix, we may then use the average of r̂i and r̂i+1 to get
more precise estimate of both ri and ri+1 . Hence, determining if there are multiple ri ’s would
be important for the estimate of ri as well, although sometimes directly using r̂i is sufficient. In
the following, we propose a statistic to test the hypothesis:
H0 : rj0 −1 > rj0 = rj0 +1 = · · · = rj0 +j1 −1 > rj0 +j1
v.s.
H1 : not H0 ,
(2.9)
where j0 ≥ 1, j0 + j1 − 1 ≤ k0 and P
r0 = 1. If this test is not rejected, we then estimate
j0 +j1 −1
−1
r̂i . Under the null hypothesis in (2.9), using
rj0 = rj0 +1 = · · · = rj0 +j1 −1 by j1
i=j0
Theorem 1.10, we know that the j1 -dimensional random vector
n √n(λ − γ )
o
j
j
, j ∈ {j0 , . . . , j1 − 1}
ξ(rj0 )
converges weakly to the distribution of the ordered eigenvalues of j1 -dimensional symmetric
Gaussian random matrix G. Thus we can naturally use the testing statistics
√
n(λj0 − λj0 +j1 −1 )
Tn :=
,
ξ(r̂j0 )
where r̂j0 = j1−1
Pj0 +j1 −1
i=j0
r̂i , to test the hypothesis (2.9). We have the following theorem.
Theorem 2.5. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.10 hold. Under the null hypothesis of (2.9), we have for any x ∈ R,
G
|P(Tn ≤ x) − P(λG
1 − λj1 ≤ x)| → 0,
G
where λG
1 and λj1 are the largest and smallest eigeivalues of j1 -dimensional symmetric Gaussian
random matrix G (defined in Theorem 1.10) respectively. In addition, if the alternative hypothesis
H1 is: there exists some j2 ∈ [0, j1 − 2] ∩ Z such that rj0 +j2 and rj0 +j2 +1 are well separated (c.f.
Definition 1.9), we have the power function
P ower = P(Tn > qα (j1 )) → 1,
G
where qα (j1 ) is the 1 − α quantile of the distribution λG
1 − λ j1 .
This theorem can be easily obtained by using Skorohod strong representation theorem and
Theorem 1.10, thus we omit the proof here. For convenient application, under the null hypothesis
G
the 95% empirical quantile of the distribution λG
1 − λj1 is shown in Table 5 with some different
j1 by 108 bootstrap replicates.
q5% (j1 )
j1 = 2
3.462
j1 = 3
4.593
j1 = 4
5.459
j1 = 5
6.191
j1 = 6 j1 = 7 j1 = 8 j1 = 9 j1 = 10
6.838
7.424
7.964
8.468
8.942
Table 5
G
The 5% empirical quantile of the distribution λG
1 − λj1 with 4 digits.
···
···
Finally, we give a procedure of estimating the population CCC. The algorithm is shown in
Table 6.
14
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
Step 1: {λ1 ≥ · · · ≥ λq } = Eigenvalue(Cyx );
Step 2: Test whether r1 = 0.
If not reject, then continue;
Step 3: k̂0 := max{i : λi ≥ d+ + n };
Step 4: r̂i = φ(λi ), i = 1, . . . , k̂0 ;
Step 5: If there exists
some {j0 , . . . , j0 + j1 − 1},
√
n(λj0 −λj0 +j1 −1 )
ξ(r̂j0 )
≤ q5% (j1 ),
Pj0 +j1 −1
r̂i .
then reset r̂j0 = · · · = r̂j0 +j1 −1 = j1−1 i=j
0
√
Step 6: ρ̂i = r̂i .
Table 6
Algorithm for estimating the population CCC.
such that
2.4. The limestone grassland community data. To illustrate the application of canonical correlation, we apply our result to a limestone grassland community data which can be obtained
from Table A-2 of [24]. This data records eight species (x, p = 8) and six soil variables (y,
q = 6) from forty-five (n = 44) 10m × 10m stands in a limestone grassland community in Anglesey, North Wales. This experiment concerns relationships between the abundances of several
plant species and associated soil characteristics. More explanations can be found in Chapter 7
of [24]. Notice that although the dimensions p, q and the sample size n are not so “large”, from
the simulations (some results are not reported in this manuscript), we can already observe the
high-dimensional effect when the dimensions are bigger than 5 and sample sizes are bigger than
20, i.e., the classical estimates are already not reliable. The eigenvalues of Cyx are as follows:
λ1 = 0.829,
λ2 = 0.520,
λ3 = 0.359,
λ4 = 0.107,
λ5 = 0.094,
λ6 = 0.038.
3 = 0.468. Then we use (2.1) to test the hypothesis
In addition, we have d+ = 0.533 and ξtw
r1 = 0, and obtain the p-value to be 3.71 × 10−5 . Thus we have strong evidence to reject the null
hypothesis, which suggests the existence of a linear relationship between x and y. Since there is
only one eigenvalue
√ of Cyx which is bigger that d+ , we can only determine the existence of the
first CCC ρ̂1 = r̂1 = 0.864, which is estimated by (2.8). For the rest CCC, we have no enough
evidence to ensure their existence.
3. Preliminaries. In this section, we introduce some basic notions and known technical
results escorting our proofs and calculations in the subsequent sections.
For any given probability distribution σ(λ), its Stieltjes transform is known as
Z
1
sσ (z) :=
dσ(λ), z ∈ C+ := {ω ∈ C : =ω > 0}.
λ−z
From the definition, we can immediately get the fact that =sσ (z) > 0 for z ∈ C+ . Actually, the
definition of sσ (z) can be extended to the domain C \ supp(σ), by setting sσ (z̄) = sσ (z), where
supp(σ) represents the support of σ(λ). Then sσ (z) is holomorphic on C \ supp(σ).
In the sequel, we will also need the Stieltjes transform of the MANOVA matrices A(A + B)−1
and A(A + B)−1 , where
A ∼ Wp (Ip , q),
B ∼ Wp (Ip , n − q),
A ∼ Wq (Iq , p),
B ∼ Wq (Iq , n − p)
From [2], we know that the Stieltjes transform of A(A + B)−1 converges (a.s.) to
p
z − c1 − c2 − (z − d− )(z − d+ ) 1
− ,
š(z) :=
2c1 z(z − 1)
z
(3.1)
15
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
and the Stieltjes transform of A(A + B)−1 converges to
p
z − c1 − c2 − (z − d− )(z − d+ ) 1
− .
s̃(z) :=
2c2 z(z − 1)
z
(3.2)
Note that s̃(z) is the Stieltjes transform of the distribution given in (1.6), according to the
discussions in Section 1.1.
Throughout the paper, we will often use the well known large deviation result of the extreme
eigenvalues of Wishart matrices. Assume that S ∼ Wn1 (In1 , n2 ) for some n1 := n1 (n) and
n2 := n2 (n) satisfying n1 /n → a1 ∈ (0, 1), n2 /n → a2 ∈ (0, 1) as n tends to infinity, and
−1
a := a1 /a2 ∈ (0, 1). Denoting λ1 (n−1
2 S) and λn1 (n2 S) the largest and the smallest eigenvalues
of n−1
2 S respectively, it is well known that for any given positive number ε > 0,
√
√ 2
−1
(1 + a)2 + ε ≥ λ1 (n−1
(3.3)
2 S) ≥ λn1 (n2 S) ≥ (1 − a) − ε
holds with overwhelming probability ( see Theorem 2.13 of [14])
4. Determinant equation. In this section, we derive a determinant equation for the eigenvalues of Cxy which are not in the spectrum of the null case. We will see that the canonical
correlation matrix in the finite rank case can be viewed as a finite rank perturbation of that in
the null case.
As mentioned above, the canonical correlation coefficients are invariant under the block diagonal transformation (xi , yi ) → (Axi , Byi ), for any p × p matrix A and q × q matrix B, as long
as both of them are nonsingular. Hence, to study λi , we can start with the following setting
Ip T
X
1/2
= Σ V, Σ =
,
T 0 Iq
Y
where V is a (p + q) × n matrix with i.i.d. N (0, 1) entries, and
√
√
T = diag( r1 , . . . , rk ) ⊕ 0(p−k)×(q−k) ,
e.g. see Muirhead [38], page 530, formula (7). Apparently, there exists a Gaussian matrix W
independent of Y such that
W + TY
X
.
(4.1)
=
Y
Y
Here
vec(W ) ∼ N 0, In ⊗ (Ip − T T 0 ) .
Hence, W is a p × n matrix with independent entries. More specifically, wij ∼ N (0, 1 − ri ).
According to the above definitions, we have
Σxx = Ip ,
Σyy = Iq ,
Σxy = T,
Σyx = T 0 .
For brevity, from now on, we use symbols W, X, Y to denote the scaled data matrices, i.e.,
1
W := √ W ,
n
1
X := √ X ,
n
1
Y := √ Y .
n
(4.2)
Correspondingly, we introduce the notations
Sww = W W 0 ,
Swy = W Y 0 ,
Syw = Y W 0 ,
Syy = Y Y 0 .
(4.3)
16
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
In light of (4.1), we have
Sxx = Sww + T Syw + Swy T 0 + T Syy T 0 ,
Sxy = Swy + T Syy ,
Syx = Syw + Syy T 0 .
(4.4)
Hence, due to the assumption that rank(T ) = k, Cxy can be regarded as a finite rank perturbation
of Cwy . Note that, with probability 1, the eigenvalues of Cxy are the solutions for λ of the
characteristic equation
−1
det(D) := det(Sxy Syy
Syx − λSxx ) = 0.
(4.5)
In light of (4.4), it is equivalent to
−1
det(Swy Syy
Syw − λSww + (1 − λ)(T Syw + Swy T 0 + T Syy T 0 )) = 0.
Denote by
Py = Y 0 (Y Y 0 )−1 Y.
(4.6)
Then both Py and In − Py are projections with rank(Py ) = q and rank(In − Py ) = n − q almost
surely. Further, we decompose the matrix W and T as follows,
W1
T1
W =
,
T =
,
(4.7)
W2
0
where W1 (resp. T1 ) is a k × n (resp. k × q) matrix composed by the first k rows of W (resp. T ).
Correspondingly, we can introduce the notations like Syw2 = Y W20 , Sw2 w2 = W2 W20 , analogously
to (4.3). Applying the decompositions in (4.7), we can rewrite (4.5) in the following form
D11 D12
det(D) = det
=0
(4.8)
D21 D22
where
D11 ≡ D11 (λ) := W1 Py W10 − λW1 W10 + (1 − λ)(T1 Y W10 + W1 Y 0 T10 + T1 Y Y 0 T10 ),
D12 ≡ D12 (λ) := W1 Py W20 − λW1 W20 + (1 − λ)T1 Y W20 ,
D21 ≡ D21 (λ) := W2 Py W10 − λW2 W10 + (1 − λ)W2 Y 0 T10
(4.9)
and
D22 ≡ D22 (λ) := W2 Py W20 − λW2 W20 = Sw2 w2 (Cw2 y − λ),
(4.10)
where Cw2 y is defined analogously to (1.2). In case D22 is invertible, we have the equation
−1
det(D) = det(D22 ) det(D11 − D12 D22
D21 ) = 0, which implies
−1
det(D11 (λ) − D12 (λ)D22
(λ)D21 (λ)) = 0.
(4.11)
Apparently, the sufficient condition of D22 (λ) being invertible is that λ is not an eigenvalue
of Cw2 y . Notice that since k is fixed and W2 is independent of Y , we can apply the results in
Theorems 1.3 and 1.5 to the matrix Cw2 y as well. Hence, if we want to investigate the eigenvalues
which are not in Spec(Cw2 y ), it suffices to solve (4.11) and find the properties of the limits of
its solutions.
For brevity, we introduce the notation
−1
Mn (z) := D11 (z) − D12 (z)D22
(z)D21 (z)
(4.12)
17
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
which is a well defined k × k matrix-valued function for all z ∈ C \ Spec(Cw2 y ). using (4.9), (4.10)
and the fact Y Py = Y , we can write
Mn (z) = Z1 A (z)Z10 ,
(4.13)
where
Z1 = W1 + T1 Y,
A (z) = (Py − z) − (Py − z)W20 W2 (Py − z)W20
−1
W2 (Py − z).
(4.14)
Hereafter, we often use z to represent zI in short when the dimension of the identity matrix is
clear.
5. Limits. In this section, we provide the proof of Theorem 1.8 based on several lemmas,
whose proofs will be postponed. Our discussion consists of two parts, aimed at (i) and (ii) in
Theorem 1.8, respectively: (1) For the outliers, we locate them by deriving the limits of the
solutions to the equation (4.11); (2) For the eigenvalues sticking to d+ , we simply use Cauchy’s
interlacing property to get the conclusion.
• The outliers
To locate the outliers, we start with the equation (4.11), i.e., det Mn (z) = 0. Intuitively, if Mn (z)
is close to some deterministic matrix-valued function M (z) in certain sense, it is reasonable to
expect that the solutions of (4.11) are close to those of the equation det[M (z)] = 0. Such an
implication can be explicitly formulated in the location lemma given later, see Lemma 5.2. To
state the result, we introduce more notations. Set for any positive constant δ the domain
D ≡ D(δ) := z ∈ C : d+ + δ < <z ≤ 2, |=z| ≤ 1 .
(5.1)
Define the functions s(z), mi (z) : D → C as follows:
p
z − c1 − c2 − (z − d− )(z − d+ )
s(z) :=
.
2(z − 1)
1−z
mi (z) := c2 − (1 + c1 )z − (1 − z)s(z) (1 − ri ) + (1 − z) 1 −
s(z) ri ,
c2
(5.2)
(5.3)
where the square root is specified as the one with positive imaginary part in case z ∈ C+ , and
s(z̄) = s(z). It is elementary to see that s(z) and mi (z)’s are all holomorphic on C \ [d− , d+ ] and
thus also on D. In addition, from the definition (5.2), s(z) satisfies the following equation
(z − 1)s2 (z) + (c1 + c2 − z)s(z) − c1 c2 = 0.
(5.4)
Recall š(z) and s̃(z) from (3.1) and (3.2). We see that
š(z) =
1
1
s(z) − ,
c1 z
z
s̃(z) =
1
1
s(z) − .
c2 z
z
(5.5)
Further, we define the diagonal matrix
M (z) := diag m1 (z), . . . , mk (z) .
Recall δ in the definition of D in (5.1). We introduce the following event
n
δo
Ξ1 ≡ Ξ1 (n, δ) := kCw2 y k ≤ d+ +
,
2
(5.6)
Note that, Theorem 1.5 tells us that Ξ1 holds with overwhelming probability. Hence, we have
k(Cw2 y − z)−1 k = O(1) for all z ∈ D with overwhelming probability. This also implies that, in
Ξ1 , Mn (z) is holomorphic on D almost surely.
Our main technical task for the limits part is the following lemma.
18
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
Lemma 5.1.
For any given δ > 0, and any sufficiently small ε > 0,
sup
sup
|(Mn )ij (z) − Mij (z)| ≤ n−ε
z∈D i,j=1,...,k
holds almost surely.
The proof of Lemma 5.1 will be postponed to Section 8. The following location lemma is a
direct consequence of Lemma 5.1. At first, we remark here, it will be clear that the solutions of
the equation det(M (z)) = 0 can only be real.
Lemma 5.2 (The location lemma). For any given and sufficiently small δ > 0, let z1 > · · · >
zκ be the solutions in (d+ + δ, 1) of the equation det(M (z)) = 0, with multiplicities n1 , . . . , nκ
respectively. Then for any fixed η > 0 and each i ∈ {1, . . . , κ}, almost surely,
Pκi there exists
zn,i,1 > · · · > zn,i,κi with multiplicities mi,1 , . . . , mi,κi respectively, satisfying j=1 mi,j = ni ,
such that
sup |zn,i,j − zi | ≤ η,
(5.7)
j=1...,κi
and ∪si=1 {zn,i,j , j = 1, . . . , κi } is the collection of all solutions (multiplicities counted) of the
equation det Mn (z) = 0 in (d+ + δ, 1).
Proof of Lemma 5.2 with Lemma 5.1 granted. At first, as mentioned above, in Ξ1 ,
Mn (z) is holomorphic on D. Moreover, according to (3.3), both Y and W are bounded by
some constant in operator norm with overwhelming probability. In addition, we know that Ξ1
holds with overwhelming probability. Hence, according to the definition of Mn (z) in (4.12), one
sees that kMn (z)k is bounded uniformly on D with overwhelming probability. Therefore, the entries of Mn (z) are all bounded in magnitude with overwhelming probability as well. In addition,
it is clear that M (z) is holomorphic and its entries are also bounded in magnitude on D. Hence,
Lemma 5.1 implies that almost surely,
sup det(Mn (z)) − det(M (z)) ≤ n−ε ,
z∈D
taking into account the fact that the determinant is a multivariate polynomial of the matrix
entries. It is obvious that det[Mn (z)] only has real roots since the equation (4.5) does. Then by
Rouche’s theorem, we can immediately get (5.7).
Now, with the aid of Lemma 5.2, we prove (i) of Theorem 1.8.
Proof of (i) of Theorem 1.8. According to Lemma 5.2, it suffices to solve det(M (z)) = 0
in (d+ + δ, 1] to get zi , for sufficiently small δ > 0. By the definition of M (z), we shall solve the
equation
mi (z) = 0.
(5.8)
It will be clear that there is a unique simple solution for the above equation. We denote it by
γi in the sequel.
First, if ri = 1, we get from the definition (5.3) that
1 − γi
mi (γi ) = (1 − γi ) 1 −
s(γi ) = 0.
c2
It is elementary to check that the only solution is γi = 1. If ri < 1, we introduce the shorthand
notation
ri
.
(5.9)
ti =
1 − ri
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
19
According to the definition in (5.3), we see that (5.8) is equivalent to
q
γi2 + 2(2c1 c2 − c1 − c2 )γi + (c1 − c2 )2 (c2 − ti γi + ti )
= ti γi2 + (ti (c2 − c1 − 1) + c2 − 2c1 c2 )γi + (c1 − c2 )ti + c1 c2 − c22 .
(5.10)
Notice that if γi ∈ (d+ , 1], we have
γi2 + 2(2c1 c2 − c1 − c2 )γi + (c1 − c2 )2 = (γi − d− )(γi − d+ ) > 0
and c2 − ti γi + ti > 0. Thus under the restriction that
ti γi2 + (ti (c2 − c1 − 1) + c2 − 2c1 c2 )γi + (c1 − c2 )ti + c1 c2 − c22 ≥ 0,
(5.11)
solving (5.10), we get
γi =
−1
(1 + t−1
i c1 )(1 + ti c2 )
= ri (1 − c1 + c1 ri−1 )(1 − c2 + c2 ri−1 ).
−1
1 + ti
Applying (5.9) and (5.12), it is elementary to check that (5.11) is equivalent to
r
c1 c2
.
ri ≥ rc =
(1 − c1 )(1 − c2 )
(5.12)
(5.13)
Note that
γi = c1 (1 − c2 ) + c2 (1 − c1 ) + ri (1 − c1 )(1 − c2 ) + ri−1 c1 c2
p
≥ c1 (1 − c2 ) + c2 (1 − c1 ) + 2 c1 c2 (1 − c1 )(1 − c2 ) = d+
(5.14)
Moreover, equality holds in the second step of (5.14) only if ri = rc . Hence, (5.8) has solution
in (d+ , ∞) only if ri > rc , with the solution γi given by (5.12). Now, what remains is to check
γi < 1. It again follows from (5.13) by elementary calculation. Then by (5.7) in Lemma 5.1, we
get that
a.s.
λi − γi −→ 0,
for i = 1, . . . , k0 .
Hence, we conclude the proof of (i) of Theorem 1.8.
Now, we proceed to the proof of (ii) .
• The Sticking eigenvalues
Proof of (ii) of Theorem 1.8. At first, according to the proof of (i) of Theorem 1.8, we
see that with overwhelming probability, there are exactly k0 largest eigenvalues (multiplicities
counted) of Cxy in the interval (d+ + δ, 1], for any sufficiently small δ > 0. Hence, we see that
lim supn→∞ λi ≤ d+ + δ for all i ≥ k0 + 1 almost surely. Moreover, by the Cauchy’s interlacing
property and (1.8), we always have lim inf n→∞ λi ≥ d+ − δ almost surely for any fixed i. Since
a.s.
δ can be arbitrarily small, we get the conclusion that λi − d+ −→ 0 for any fixed i ≥ k0 + 1.
Hence, we complete the proof.
20
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
6. Fluctuations of the outliers. For the fluctuations of the outliers, we first derive a CLT
for the entries of Mn , which together with (4.11) will imply a CLT for the outliers. Recall from
Lemma 5.2 the notations n1 , . . . , nκ as the multiplicities of the solutions of det[M (z)] = 0. Set
Jl =
l−1
nX
ni + 1, . . . ,
i=1
l
X
o
ni .
i=1
√
We derive the central limit theorem for the nl -packed sample eigenvalues { n(λj − γj ), j ∈
Jl }. Note that γj ’s are all the same for j ∈ Jl , and they are l-th largest solution of equation
det[M (z)] = 0 with multiplicity nl . Actually, from Lemma 5.1 and Lemma 5.2, for j ∈ Jl , it
would not be difficult to conclude that for any sufficiently small ε > 0,
(Mn )αβ (λj ) − Mαβ (γj ) ≤ n−ε
sup
(6.1)
1≤α,β≤k
almost surely. However, for Theorem 1.10, we need to take a step further to consider the fluctuation of the difference in (6.1). We split the task into three steps, and the results are collected
in Lemmas 6.1-6.3. The first lemma is to expand Mn (λj ) around Mn (γj ). Recall the notations
ϑ, $ defined in (1.14).
Lemma 6.1. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.10 hold. Especially, j ∈ {1, . . . , k0 }
such that rj is well separated from rc and 1. As n → ∞, we have
√
√
n[Mn (λj ) − Mn (γj )] = − n(λj − γj ) ∆ + op (1) ,
where ∆ is a diagonal matrix defined as
∆=
(1 − c1 )ϑrj2 + c21 c2
ϑrj2 − $
Ik −
T1 T10
+
(1 − c1 )ϑrj3 + c1 (3c1 c2 − c1 − 2c2 + 1)rj − 2c21 c2
rj (ϑrj2 − $)
T1 T10 ,
and op (1) represents a generic k × k matrix with negligible (in probability) entries.
Recall A (z) defined in (4.14). We further introduce the following matrices
M1 ≡ M1 (z) := W1 A (z)W10 ,
M2 ≡ M2 (z) := T1 Y A (z)W10 ,
M3 ≡ M3 (z) := T1 Y A (z)Y 0 T10 .
(6.2)
According to the definitions in (4.12), (4.9) and (4.10), it is easy to check that
Mn (z) = M1 + M2 + M20 + M3 .
(6.3)
Y = Uy Λy Vy .
(6.4)
We denote the SVD of Y by
It is well known that Uy and Vy are Haar distributed, and Uy , Λy , Vy are mutually independent
(see (3.9) of [16] for instance). Then we see that
Py = Vy0 Λ0y Λy Λ0y
−1
Λy Vy .
(6.5)
is independent of Uy . With the above notations, we introduce
B ≡ B(z) := Λy Vy A (z),
D ≡ D(z) := Λy Vy A (z)Vy0 Λ0y .
(6.6)
21
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
Therefore, we can write
M1 = W1 A W10 ,
M2 = T1 Uy BW10 ,
M3 = T1 Uy DUy0 T10 .
(6.7)
Set
M(γj ) :=
1
1
tr A (γj ) · Ik − T1 T10 + tr D(γj ) · T1 T10
n
q
The next lemma depicts the fluctuation of Mn (γj ) around M(γj ).
Lemma 6.2. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.10 hold. For any j ∈ {1, . . . , k0 }
such that rj is well separated from rc and 1, we have that
√
n Mn (γj ) − M(γj )
converges weakly to a k × k symmetric Gaussian matrix R with independent (up to symmetry)
mean zero entries and the variance of Rαβ is
2
2
1 + δαβ
(1 − c1 )rj + c1 ϑrj − $ (1 − c2 )rj2 + c2 (1 − rα )(1 − rβ )
2
2
rj (ϑrj − $)
2
2
+ (1 − c2 ) (1 − c1 )rj + c1 (1 − rj )2 ϑrj − $ (rα (1 − rβ ) + rβ (1 − rα ))
2
2
+ (1 − c1 )rj + c1 ϑrj − $ (1 − c2 )rj2 + 2c1 (1 − c2 )rj + c1 (1 − 2c2 ) rα rβ .
(6.8)
Finally, we claim that the difference between M(γj ) and M (γj ) is of order op ( √1n ).
Lemma 6.3. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.10 hold. For any j ∈ {1, . . . , k0 }
such that rj is well separated from rc and 1, we have that
√
n M(γj ) − M (γj ) = op (1),
where op (1) represents a generic k × k matrix with negligible (in probability) entries.
The proofs of Lemmas 6.1-6.3 will be postponed to Section 9. With the aid of these lemmas,
we can now prove Theorem 1.10.
Proof of Theorem 1.10. Note that det Mn (λj ) = 0, and M (γj ) is a diagonal matrix with
diagonal elements mi (γj ), i = 1, . . . , k (c.f. (5.3)). In addition, for any l = 1, . . . , l0 , mi (γj ) is zero
if i ∈ Jl and nonzero otherwise. Therefore by Lemmas 6.1-6.3, the definition of T1 and Skorohod
strong representation theorem, we conclude that there exists a random matrix R defined in
Lemma 6.2, such that for any j, α, β ∈ Jl ,
√
√
n (Mn )αβ (λj ) − Mαβ (γj ) = −δαβ ∆jj n(λj − γj )(1 + op (1)) + Rαβ + op (1).
(6.9)
(l)
(l)
Let N (l) be a k × k diagnoal matrix with Njj = n1/4 if j ∈ Jl and Njj = 1 otherwise.
Apparently we have det[N (l) ] = nnl /4 6= 0. Combining Theorem 1.8 with Lemmas 6.1-6.3, we
conclude that
√
N (l) Mn (λj )N (l) = M (γj ) +
n(Mn )αβ (λj )1(j, α, β ∈ Jl ) k×k + op (1).
Notice that M (γj ) is a diagonal matrix with Jl diagonal elements being zeros and
√
n(Mn )αβ (λj )1(j, α, β ∈ Jl ) k×k
22
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
is a null matrix except the Jl × Jl block. According to det(N (l) Mn (λj )N (l) ) = 0 and (6.9), we
obtain that
√
(6.10)
n(λj − γj )(Inl + op (1)) + R(Jl × Jl )/∆(j, j) = 0,
det − lim
n→∞
√
where R(Jl × Jl ) represents the Jl × Jl block of R. From (6.10), we see that limn→∞ n(λj − γj )
is the eigenvalue of R(Jl × Jl )/∆jj . Since the eigenvalues of Cyx are simple almost surely, we
√
see that the nl random variables { n(λj − γj ), j ∈ Jl } converge in probability to the set of
eigenvalues of the matrix R(Jl × Jl )/∆jj . The variance in (1.11) can be obtained from the
definition of ∆ in Lemma 6.1, and also (6.8).
Therefore, we complete the proof of Theorem 1.10.
7. Fluctuations of the sticking eigenvalues. In this section, we prove Theorem 1.12.
When k = 1, the main idea is to compare the eigenvalues of Cxy with those of Cw2 y directly.
Then we use the Tracy-Widom law for the largest eigenvalues of Cw2 y to conclude the fluctuation
of the sticking eigenvalues of Cxy . For more general k, we use the argument for the case k = 1
recursively. Our proof strategy is inspired by the work [10].
e1 ≥ λ
e2 ≥ · · · ≥ λ
eq the ordered
For the comparison, throughout this section, we denote by λ
eigenvalues of Cyw2 , while use λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ · · · ≥ λq to denote the ordered eigenvalues of Cyx as
before.
Our aim is to show the following proposition.
Proposition 7.1. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.12 holds. Then for any small
positive constant ε and any fixed integer i ≥ 1, the following holds in probability
ei | ≤ n−1+ε .
|λk0 +i − λ
(7.1)
With the aid of Proposition 7.1, we can prove Theorem 1.12 below.
Proof of Theorem 1.12. Let
X̂ := W + T Ŷ ,
(7.2)
where Ŷ is a i.i.d. copy of Y and Ŷ is independent of Y . Denote by Cyx̂ via replacing X by
X̂ in Cyx . Then Cyx is a CCA matrix in the null case. We first compare the eigenvalues of
ei . Applying Proposition 7.1 to the case
Cyx̂ , denoted by λ̊i ’s, with the eigenvalues of Cyw2 , i.e., λ
e
r1 = · · · = rk = 0, we can get max1≤i≤m |λ̊i − λi | ≤ n−1+ε in probability. This together with
(7.1) implies (1.12). This together with Remark 1.13 completes the proof of Theorem 1.12.
To prove Proposition 7.1. We will need the following lemmas.
Lemma 7.2. For any i = 0, . . . , q, and j = 1, . . . , k, the diagonal entry (Mn )jj (z) is a
ei+1 , λ
ei ), where λ
e0 = ∞ and λ
eq+1 = −∞.
decreasing function in z ∈ (λ
Proof. Recall (4.13) and (4.14). It is elementary to check that
∂A (z)
= −Q(z)(Q(z))T ,
∂z
where
Q(z) := I + (Py − z)W20 W2 (Py − z)W20
−1
W2
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
Note that, as long as z 6∈ Spec(Cw2 y ),
Hence,
∂A (z)
∂z
23
is a well-defined negative semi-definite matrix.
∂A (z)
∂
≤0
(Mn )jj (z) = Z1
Z10
∂z
∂z
jj
ei+1 , λ
ei ) for any i = 0, . . . , q, which means that (Mn )jj (z) is decreasing.
in the interval (λ
Let m ≥ 1 be any fixed integer. For any small constants ε, δ > 0, we introduce the following
random domain
n
o
e1 + n−1+ε , d+ + δ) ∪ ∪m (λ
ei+1 + n−1+ε , λ
ei − n−1+ε )
Ω ≡ Ω(m, ε, δ) := (λ
(7.3)
i=1
We also need the following lemma.
Lemma 7.3. With the above notations, we have the following:
(i): If i 6= j, for any small ε, δ > 0, there exists some positive constant c > 0, such that
sup |(Mn )ij (z)| ≤ n−c
z∈Ω
holds with overwhelming probability.
(ii): For any small ε > 0 and any small ε0 > 0, there exists a sufficiently small δ, such that
sup |(Mn )ii (z) − mi (d+ )| ≤ ε0
z∈Ω
holds with overwhelming probability.
The proof of Lemma 7.3 is postponed to Appendix B.
In the sequel, we first show the proof of Proposition 7.1 in the case of k = 1. At the end of
this section, we will extend the discussion to general k case. Note that when k = 1, We have
k0 = 1 or k0 = 0, which means r1 > rc or r1 < rc , respectively. We restate Proposition 7.1 for
k = 1 in the following proposition.
Proposition 7.4. Suppose that k = 1. We have the following
(i): If r1 > rc , then for any fixed integer m ≥ 1, and any ε > 0, we have
em | ≤ n−1+ε
|λm+1 − λ
in probability.
(ii): If r1 < rc , then for any fixed integer m ≥ 1, and any ε > 0, we have
em | ≤ n−1+ε
|λm − λ
in probability.
With Lemma 7.2 and Lemma 7.3, we prove Proposition 7.4.
Proof of Proposition 7.4. Since k = 1, we have det Mn = Mn (z) = M11 (z). Applying
Lemma 7.3 with k = 1, we see that for any small ε0 , there is a sufficiently small δ > 0 such that
sup | det Mn (z) − m1 (d+ )| ≤ ε0
(7.4)
z∈Ω
with overwhelming probability. Since we assume that r1 is well separated from rc , it is easy to
check from the definition (5.3) that |m1 (d+ )| ≥ c for some positive constant c. Hence, choosing
24
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
ε0 in (7.4) sufficiently small, we see that | det Mn (z)| =
6 0 uniformly on Ω, with overwhelming
probability. That means, with overwhelming probability, there is no eigenvalue of Cxy in Ω.
Let wi , i = 1, . . . , p be the rows of W . Note that, in case of k = 1, we have w1 = W1 .
Moreover, Pw is the projection onto the subspace spanned by {w1 + T1 Y, w2 , · · · , wp }, and Pw2
is the projection onto the subspace spanned by {w2 , · · · , wp }. Then, by Cauchy interlacing, we
know that Spec(Pw Py Pw ) and Spec(Pw2 Py Pw2 ) are interlacing. This implies that
e 1 ≥ λ2 ≥ · · · ≥ λ
eq−1 ≥ λq ≥ λ
eq ,
λ1 ≥ λ
(7.5)
since the nonzero eigenvalues of Cwy (resp. Cw2 y ) are the same as those of Pw Py Pw (resp.
Pw2 Py Pw2 ).
In case (i): r1 > rc , from Theorem 1.8 we know that λ1 → γ1 > d+ + δ almost surely, for any
sufficiently small δ > 0. Since λi ’s are solutions to det Mn (z) = 0, and m1 (d+ ) 6= 0, we see from
(7.4) and (7.5) that
ei+1 , λ
ei+1 + n−1+ε ] ∪ [λ
ei − n−1+ε , λ
ei ],
λ i ∈ [λ
i = 2, . . . , m.
in probability.
In case (ii): r1 < rc , from Theorem 1.8 we know that λ1 → d+ in probability. Hence, we have
e1 , λ
e1 + n−1+ε ],
λ1 ∈ [λ
ei+1 , λ
ei+1 + n−1+ε ] ∪ [λ
ei − n−1+ε , λ
ei ],
λi ∈ [λ
i = 2, . . . , m.
Therefore, to prove Proposition 7.4, it suffices to check that for all i = 2, · · · , m, λi is in
ei+1 , λ
ei+1 + n−1+ε ] or [λ
ei − n−1+ε , λ
ei ]. Note that det Mn (z) = (Mn )11 (z) is decreasing in the in[λ
+ −c1 −c2
e
e
terval (λi+1 , λi ), according to Lemma 7.2. Furthermore, since s(d+ ) = d2(d
, it is elementary
+ −1)
to check
mj (d+ ) > 0,
if rj > rc ,
mj (d+ ) < 0,
if rj < rc .
ei+1 + n−1+ε , λ
ei − n−1+ε ).
Therefore, if r1 > rc , according to (7.4), we have det Mn (z) > 0 on (λ
By the monotonicity of det Mn (z), we see that det Mn (z) = 0 can only be achieved if z ∈
ei − n−1+ε , λ
ei ]. Hence, in case of r1 > rc , we have λi ∈ [λ
ei − n−1+ε , λ
ei ] for all i = 2, . . . , m. In
[λ
−1+ε
e
e
contrast, when r1 < rc , we have λi ∈ [λi+1 , λi+1 + n
] for all i = 2, . . . , m.
This concludes the proof of Proposition 7.4.
Now, we prove Proposition 7.1.
Proof of Proposition 7.1. For general k, we need more notations. For 1 ≤ a ≤ k, let
w1
t1
..
W1a := ... ,
T1a :=
.
0
wa
ta
be the a × n matrices composed of the first a rows of W and T , respectively, and we write
W1a
T1a
W =
,
T =
.
W2a
T2a
We take the above as the definitions of W2a and T2a . Further, we denote
Xa := W2a + T2a Y.
25
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
Denote the eigenvalues of Cxa y by
λ1,a ≥ λ2,a ≥ · · ·
(7.6)
ei = λi,k and λi = λi,0 . Our aim is compare
Especially, with the above notations, we have λ
λi,a−1 ’s with λi,a ’s. First of all, by Cauchy interlacing, we have
λi−1,a ≥ λi,a−1 ≥ λi,a .
(7.7)
Further, if λi,a−1 6∈ Spec(Cxa y ), then λi,a−1 is a solution to the equation
za−1 Pa z0a−1 = 0,
(7.8)
where
za−1 := wa−1 + ta−1 ya−1 ,
and
Pa (z) := (Py − z) − (Py − z)Xa0 (Xa (Py − z)Xa0 )−1 Xa (Py − z).
We start with the case a = k − 1 and compare λi,a−1 ’s with λi,a ’s. This is equivalent to discuss
the case k = 2. Hence, we can set k = 2 and a = 1. We recall the decomposition of D in (4.8).
By Schur complement, we have
D
−1
=
D11 D12
D21 D22
−1
=
(Mn )−1 ∗
∗
∗
,
(7.9)
where ∗’s represent other blocks, whose explicit expressions are irrelevant to us. Observe that Mn
(c.f. (4.12)) is 2×2 by the assumption k = 2. On the other hand, using a different decomposition,
we can also get by Schur complement that
D−1 =
z1 (Py − z)z01 z1 (Py − z)X2
X20 (Py − z)z01 X2 (Py − z)X20
−1
=
(z1 P2 z01 )−1 ∗
∗
∗
.
(7.10)
From (7.9) and (7.10), we obtain
z1 P2 z01 =
1
.
(Mn−1 )11
(7.11)
Then, we first consider the eigenvalues of Cx1 y , which is a perturbation of Cw2 y . Recall the
notations introduced in (7.6). Using Proposition 7.4, we see that the following statements hold
in probability:
(i): If r2 > rc , we have for any fixed integer m ≥ 0
em | ≤ n−1+ε .
|λm+1,1 − λ
(7.12)
(ii): If r2 < rc , we have for any fixed integer m ≥ 0,
em | ≤ n−1+ε .
|λm,1 − λ
(7.13)
According to the assumption r1 ≥ r2 , it suffices to consider the following three cases:
(i)0 : r1 ≥ r2 > rc ,
(ii)0 : r1 > rc > r2 ,
(iii)0 : rc > r1 > r2 .
26
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
First, we consider case (i)’. Applying Theorem 1.8, we see that
λ1,0 → γ1 ,
λ2,0 → γ2 ,
λm,0 → d+
almost surely. Recall Cauchy interlacing formula (7.7). We see that λm,1 ≥ λm+1,0 ≥ λm+1,1 .
We first show
em + n−1+ε , λ
em−1 − n−1+ε )
λm+1,0 6∈ (λ
(7.14)
in probability. Then according to (7.12), we have
λm+1,0 6∈ (λm+1,1 + 2n−1+ε , λm,1 − 2n−1+ε )
(7.15)
in probability.
To see (7.14), we use (7.11), which together with Lemma 7.3 implies
sup |z1 P2 (z)z01 − m1 (d+ )| ≤ ε0 .
z∈Ω
Hence, (7.14) and (7.15) follow. Further, similarly to Lemma 7.2, we can show that z1 P2 (z)z01 is
decreasing in (λm,1 , λm+1,1 ). Then, by the sign of m1 (d+ ) and the fact that λi,0 is the solution
to the equation z1 P2 (z)z01 = 0, we see that
|λm+1,0 − λm,1 | ≤ 2n−1+ε
(7.16)
in probability. This together with (7.12) further implies that
em−1 | ≤ 3n−1+ε .
|λm+1,0 − λ
(7.17)
Then we get the conclusion for case (i)’, by slightly modifying ε. For case (ii)’, it suffices to go
em−1 , λ
em ) replaced by (λ
em , λ
em+1 ) in (7.14) and (7.18). For
through the above discussion, with (λ
e
e
e
e
case (iii)’, we first need replace (λm−1 , λm ) by (λm , λm+1 ) in (7.14) and (7.18). Then, instead of
(7.16), we have
|λm+1,0 − λm+1,1 | ≤ 2n−1+ε
since the sign of m1 (d+ ) changed. This together with (7.13) further implies that
em+1 | ≤ 3n−1+ε .
|λm+1,0 − λ
(7.18)
The above discussion on the case k = 2 simply gives the result for λi,k−1 for general k. Then,
we apply the above argument again to compare λi,k−3 ’s with λi,k−2 ’s. This is equivalent to
consider the eigenvalues of Cxy with k = 3. Using the argument recursively, we can finally get
the result for λi ’s for general k. This concludes the proof.
8. Proof of Lemma 5.1. To ease the presentation, we introduce the following notations
−1
Φ ≡ Φ(z) := D22
(z) = (W2 (Py − z)W20 )−1 ,
Υ ≡ Υ(z) := (Y (Pw2 − z)Y 0 )−1 ,
(8.1)
Observe that rank(Pw2 ) = p − k and rank(Py ) = q almost surely. For any m × ` rectangle matrix
A, using SVD, it is easy to check the identity
A(A0 A − zI` )−1 A0 = AA0 (AA0 − zIm )−1 = Im + z(AA0 − zIm )−1 .
(8.2)
27
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
Moreover, we can write
1
1
−
ew y − z)−1 Sw−22w2 ,
Φ(z) = Sw22w2 (C
2
(8.3)
where we introduced the symmetric matrix
1
1
ew y := Sw−22w2 Sw y S −1 Syw Sw−22w2 .
C
yy
2
2
2
(8.4)
Using (8.3) and (8.2), it is not difficult to check
−1/2
1/2
1/2
−1/2
= Iq + zSyy
ΥSyy
,
Syy
Syw2 ΦSw2 y Syy
(8.5)
from which we immediately get
Syw2 ΦSw2 y = Syy + zSyy ΥSyy .
(8.6)
Further, we introduce the following notations for Wishart matrices
E := W2 Py W20 ,
E := Y Pw2 Y 0 ,
H := W2 (I − Py )W20 ,
H := Y (I − Pw2 )Y 0 .
(8.7)
By Cochran’s Theorem, we know that E and H are independent, so are E and H. In addition,
in light of (4.2), we have
nE ∼ Wp−k (Ip−k , q),
nE ∼ Wq (Iq , p − k),
nH ∼ Wp−k (Ip−k , n − q),
nH ∼ Wq (Iq , n − p + k).
(8.8)
Observe that
Sw2 w2 = E + H,
Syy = E + H,
−1
−1
Cw2 y = E + H
E,
Cyw2 = E + H
E,
(8.9)
where Cw2 y and Cyw2 are defined analogously to (1.2). From (8.9), we can also write
−1
Φ(z) = ((1 − z)E − zH)−1
Υ(z) = (1 − z)E − zH
.
(8.10)
Therefore, we have
Syy ΥSyy = (E + H) (1 − z)E − zH
−1
(E + H)
= (1 − z)−1 E − z −1 H + (z(1 − z))−1 (1 − z)H−1 − zE −1
−1
(8.11)
Following from (8.6) and (8.11) we obtain
(1 − z)Syw2 ΦSw2 y = E + (1 − z)H−1 − zE −1
−1
.
(8.12)
In the sequel, we use the notation
Ψ ≡ Ψn (z) := (1 − z)H−1 − zE −1
−1
.
(8.13)
Then, we can write
(1 − z)Syw2 ΦSw2 y = E + Ψ.
(8.14)
Recall the SVD in (6.4). Note that W1 , W2 , Uy , Λy , Vy are mutually independent. According to
the definitions
of A , B, D in (4.14) and (6.6) the, definition of Φ in (8.1), and (6.5), we see that
W1 , Uy is independent of A , B, D. Hence, we can condition on W2 , Λy , Vy and thus condition
on A , B, D and use the randomness of W1 , Uy in the sequel.
Our first step is to use a k ×q Gaussian matrix to approximate T1 Uy . For simplicity, we denote
√
√
T := diag( r1 , . . . , rk ).
Apparently, T 2 = T1 T10 . More specifically, we claim the following lemma.
28
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
Lemma 8.1. With the above notations, there exists a k × q Gaussian matrix G1 with i.i.d.
N (0, 1q ) entries, such that for any sufficiently large K > 0,
M2 = T G1 BW10 + O(
(log n)K
),
n
1
(log n)K
M3 = T G1 DG01 T − tr D · T G1 G01 − I T + O(
),
q
n
(8.15)
K
hold uniformly in z ∈ D, with overwhelming probability. Here O( (lognn) ) represents a generic
K
k × k random matrix with all entries of order O( (lognn) ).
The proof of Lemma 8.1 will be postponed to Appendix. In the sequel, we condition on
A , B, D, and use the randomness of W1 and G1 only. First, we introduce the following wellknown large deviation inequalities for Gaussian which will be frequently used in the sequel.
Lemma 8.2. Assume that x, y ∈ Rn are two i.i.d. N (0, n−1 In ) vectors. Let A ∈ Cn×n and
b ∈ Rn be independent of x and y. The following three statements hold with overwhelming
probability for any sufficiently large constant K > 0:
1
(log n)K
tr A ≤
kAkHS ,
n
n
(log n)K
(iii) : |x0 b| ≤ √
kbk2 .
n
(i) : x0 Ax −
(ii) : |x0 Ay| ≤
(log n)K
kAkHS ,
n
With the aid of Lemma 8.2, we can derive the following.
Lemma 8.3. For any given δ > 0 in the definition of D (c.f. (5.1)), and any sufficiently large
constant K > 0, the following inequalities hold uniformly on D, with overwhelming probability,
(log n)K
1
≤ √
sup (M1 )ij − δij (1 − ri ) c2 − (1 + c1 )z − (1 − z) tr EΦ
,
n
n
i,j
sup (M2 )ij ≤
i,j
(log n)K
√
,
n
1
(log n)K
sup (M3 )ij − δij ri (1 − z) tr (H − Ψ) ≤ √
.
q
n
i,j
(8.16)
For simplicity, we denote by wi = (wi1 , . . . , win ) and bi := (bi1 , . . . , biq ) the i-th rows of W1
and G1 , respectively.
Proof of Lemma 8.3. In light of the definitions in (8.7) and (4.14), and also (8.10), it is
elementary to check that
1
q
1
tr A = − z − tr Φ((1 − z)2 E + z 2 H)
n
n
n
q
p
1
= − z − z − (1 − z) tr EΦ .
n
n
n
(8.17)
In addition, using the fact that kW2 k ≤ C with overwhelming probability (c.f. (3.3)), it is not
difficult to see that for all z ∈ D,
kA k2HS ≤ Cn + kΦk2 .
(8.18)
with overwhelming probability. In addition, we have
kΦk ≤ k(Cw2 y − z)−1 kkSw−12 w2 k = O(1)
(8.19)
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
29
with overwhelming probability, where we used the fact that the event Ξ1 holds with overwhelming
√
probability, and also (3.3). Hence, kA kHS ≤ C n holds with overwhelming probability on D.
Then, conditioning on the matrix A and use the randomness of wi ’s only, the first statement
in (8.16) follows from Lemma 8.2 (i), (ii) immediately.
For the second estimate in (8.16), we condition on B, and use the randomness of wi ’s and
bi ’s. Then the conclusion follows from Lemma 8.2 (ii) and the fact that
√
kBkHS ≤ C n
(8.20)
holds uniformly on D, with overwhelming probability. To see (8.20), we recall the definition of
B from (6.6). Similarly to (8.18),
kBk2HS ≤ Cn 1 + kΦk2 .
Using (8.19) again, we see that (8.20) holds.
For the third estimate, we use the randomness of bi ’s and condition on the D. Then the
conclusion again follows from Lemma 8.2 (i), (ii), the fact
1−z
1
1−z
tr D =
tr Syy − (1 − z)Syw2 ΦSw2 y =
tr (H − Ψ)
(8.21)
q
q
q
and the fact that
√
kDkHS ≤ C n
(8.22)
holds with overwhelming probability. The proof of (8.22) is similar to that of (8.20). We thus
omit the details.
This completes the proof of Lemma 8.3.
Recall s(z) in (5.2). For brevity, we further introduce the following function
1−z
s(z) − c1 .
(8.23)
c2
Hence, what remains is to estimate the normalized traces of EΦ, H and Ψ. We collect the results
in the following lemma, whose proof will be postponed to Appendix A.
%(z) :=
Lemma 8.4.
For any given z ∈ D, we have the following estimates:
1
n−p
1
1
1
tr H =
+ op ( √ ),
tr EΦ(z) = s(z) + op ( √ ),
q
n
n
n
n
1
1
tr Ψ(z) = %(z) + op ( √ ).
q
n
(8.24)
Further, for any sufficiently small constant ε > 0, we have the uniform estimate
1
1
sup tr EΦ(z) − s(z) = Oa.s. (n−ε ),
sup tr Ψ(z) − %(z) = Oa.s. (n−ε ).
z∈D n
z∈D q
With the aid of Lemmas 8.3 and 8.4, we can now prove Lemma 5.1.
Proof of Lemma 5.1. According to the decomposition in (6.3), we see from Lemmas 8.3
and 8.4 that
(Mn )ij (z) = (M1 )ij (z) + (M2 )ij (z) + (M2 )ji (z) + (M3 )ij (z)
= δij c2 − (1 + c1 )z − (1 − z)s(z) (1 − ri ) + (1 − z)(1 − c1 − %(z))ri + Oa.s. (n−ε )
= δij mi (z) + Oa.s. (n−ε )
uniformly in z ∈ D and i, j. Here in the last step we used the definitions in (5.3) and (8.23).
This completes the proof of Lemma 5.1.
30
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
9. Proofs of Lemma 6.1-6.3. In this section we prove Lemmas 6.1-6.3. First, from (1.7),
(1.10) and (1.14), it is easy to check
q
ϑrj2 − $
(γj − d− )(γj − d+ ) =
.
rj
This further implies
s(γj ) = −
$
,
ϑrj − $
s0 (γj ) =
$ϑrj2
2
.
ϑrj − $ ϑrj2 − $
(9.1)
Moreover, we need the following lemma whose proof is postponed to Appendix A.
Lemma 9.1. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.10 hold. For any j ∈ {1, . . . , k0 }
such that rj is well separated from rc and 1, we have the following estimates
−c1 + (1 − γj )s(γj )
1
+ op (1),
tr HΦ(γj ) =
n
γj
γj (1 − γj )2 s0 (γj ) + (γj2 − 1)s(γj ) + c1
1
tr (HΦ(γj )HΦ(γj )) =
+ op (1),
n
γj2
1
tr (EΦ(γj )HΦ(γj )) = (1 − γj )s0 (γj ) − s(γj ) + op (1),
n
1
tr (EΦ(γj )EΦ(γj )) = γj s0 (γj ) + s(γj ) + op (1).
n
Then, recall the definitions of E and H in (8.7), Ψ in (8.13). We have the following lemma
whose proof is also postponed to Appendix A.
Lemma 9.2. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.10 hold. For any j ∈ {1, . . . , k0 }
such that rj is well separated from rc and 1, we have the following results:
sup Ψαβ (γj ) − δαβ %(γj ) = op (1),
α,β
sup Ψ(γj )(H−1 + E −1 )Ψ(γj ) αβ − δαβ %0 (γj ) = op (1).
α,β
9.1. Proof of Lemma 6.1. Recall the decomposition of Mn in (6.3). In the sequel, we consider
M1 , M2 and M3 separately.
Recall M1 in (6.2), A (z) in (4.14) and Φ(z) in (8.10). Using the identity
Φ(z1 ) − Φ(z2 ) = (z1 − z2 )Φ(z1 )W2 W20 Φ(z2 ),
(9.2)
it is not difficult to write
√
n(M1 (λj ) − M1 (γj )) =
√
n(λj − γj )
4
X
W1 Aa W10 .
(9.3)
a=0
where
A0 := −In ,
A1 := −Py W20 Φ(γj )W2 W20 Φ(λj )W2 Py ,
A2 = A03 := Py W20 Φ(λj )W2 + γj Py W20 Φ(γj )W2 W20 Φ(λj )W2 ,
A4 := −(λj + γj )W20 Φ(λj )W2 − γj2 W20 Φ(γj )W2 W20 Φ(λj )W2 .
(9.4)
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
31
Since W1 W10 → (Ik − T1 T10 ) almost surely, we have
W1 A0 W10 = −(Ik − T1 T10 ) + op (1).
The equation (9.2) together with Theorem 1.8, (8.19) and the fact that the event Ξ1 in (5.6)
holds with overwhelming probability implies that
kΦ(λj )k = Op (1),
kΦ(λj ) − Φ(γj )k = op (1).
(9.5)
By (9.5), Lemma 8.2 and Lemma 9.1, we have
1
tr Py W20 Φ(γj )W2 W20 Φ(γj )W2 Py · (Ik − T1 T10 ) + op (1)
n
= − s0 (γj )(Ik − T1 T10 ) + op (1).
W1 A1 W10 = −
Here we used the definition of E = W2 Py W20 , and the cyclicity of trace.
Analogously, we obtain for a = 2, 3
W1 Aa W10 = s(γj ) + γj s0 (γj ) (Ik − T1 T10 ) + op (1).
and
W1 A4 W10 = c1 − s(γj ) − γj s0 (γj ) (Ik − T1 T10 ) + op (1).
Combining the above estimate yields
√
n(M1 (λj ) − M1 (γj ))
√
= n(λj − γj ) c1 − 1 + s(γj ) + (γj − 1)s0 (γj ) (Ik − T1 T10 ) + op (1) .
(9.6)
Analogously, for M2 , using Lemma 8.2, we will get
√
√
n(M2 (λj ) − M2 (γj )) = n(λj − γj )op (1),
(9.7)
At the end, we consider M3 (c.f. (6.2)). By (8.14), we can write
M3 ≡ M3 (z) := (1 − z)T1 H − Ψ T10 .
Notice that by definition in (8.13), we have
Ψ = HΥE.
(9.8)
And we also have the expansion
Ψ(z1 ) − Ψ(z2 ) = (z1 − z2 )Ψ(z2 ) H−1 + E −1 Ψ(z1 ) = (z1 − z2 )HΥ(z2 )Y Y 0 Υ(z1 )E.
(9.9)
Furthermore, analogously to (8.19), we have
−1
kΥk ≤ k(Cyw2 − z)−1 kkSyy
k = O(1)
(9.10)
with overwhelming probability, for z ∈ D. Hence, from (9.8)-(9.10), we also have the analogues
of (8.19) and (9.5)
kΨ(γj )k = Op (1),
kΨ(λj )k = Op (1),
kΨ(λj ) − Ψ(γj )k = op (1).
Then approximating Φ(λj ) by Φ(γj ), and using Lemma 9.2, we obtain
√
n(M3 (λj ) − M3 (γj ))
32
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
√
= − n(λj − γj )T1 (H − Ψ(λj ) + (1 − γj )Ψ(λj )(H−1 + E −1 )Ψ(γi ))T10
√
= − n(λj − γj ) 1 − c1 − %(γj ) + (1 − γj )%0 (γj ) T1 T10 + op (1)
√
(1 − γj )s(γj ) (1 − γj )2 s0 (γj )
= − n(λj − γj ) 1 − 2
+
T1 T10 + op (1) ,
c2
c2
(9.11)
where in the second step we used the fact Hij = δij (1 − c1 ) + op (1), and in the last step we used
the definition (8.23).
Therefore, combining (9.1) with the equations (9.6), (9.7) and (9.11), we can conclude the
proof of Lemma 6.1 by elementary calculation.
9.2. Proof of Lemma 6.2. In this subsection, we prove Lemma 6.2. Recall the matrices defined
in (6.6). Let
1
D̊ := D − tr D · I.
q
In according to (6.3), (6.7) and Lemma 8.1, we can write
A B0
1
1
W10
2
Mn − tr D · T = W1 T G1
+ op ( √ ).
0
B D̊
T G1
q
n
(9.12)
In the sequel, we condition on A , B, D, and use the randomness of W1 and G1 only. Recall the
notation wi = (wi1 , . . . , win ) as the i-th rows of W1 and further denote by di := (di1 , . . . , diq )
the i-th row of T G1 .
According to (9.12), we see that
√
1
1
n Mn ij (γj ) − δij (1 − ri ) tr A + ri tr D
n
q
√
√
1
= n wi A wj0 − δij (1 − ri ) tr A + n di Bwj0 + wi B 0 d0j
n
√
+ ndi D̊d0j + op (1) =: Qij + op (1).
Let E0 be the conditional expectation w.r.t. A , B, D. Set
X
fc (t) := exp it
cij Qij ,
φc (t) := E0 fc (t)
(9.13)
(9.14)
i≤j
for any collection of fixed numbers c := (cij )i≤j . It suffices to show that for some deterministic
s ≡ s(c),
φ0c (t) = −s2 tφc (t) + op (1).
2 2
From (9.15) one can solve φc (t) = exp(− s 2t + op (1)), which further implies
Efc (t) = Eφc (t) → exp(−
s2 t2
).
2
This is known as Tikhomirov’s method for CLT [44].
To establish (9.15), we start with the definitions in (9.13) and (9.14). Then we have
q
√ X X
1
φ0c (t) = i n
cij
E0 wi` A wj0 ` fc (t) − δij (1 − ri ) tr A φc (t)
n
i≤j
`=1
(9.15)
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
33
q
√ X X
cij
E0 wj` di B ` + wi` B 0 d0j ` fc (t)
+i n
i≤j
√ X
cij
+i n
i≤j
`=1
q
X
E0 di` D̊d0j ` fc (t) .
(9.16)
`=1
Using integration by parts formula for Gaussian
Egh(g) = σ 2 Eh0 (g),
g ∼ N (0, σ 2 ),
(9.17)
we see that
1
∂Q
X
it
αβ
E0 wi` A wj0 ` fc (t) = δij (1 − ri )A`` φc (t) + (1 − ri )
cαβ E0
A wj0 ` fc (t)
n
n
∂wi`
α≤β
E0 wj` di B ` + wi` B 0 d0j ` fc (t)
∂Qαβ
∂Qαβ
it X
=
cαβ E0 (1 − rj )
di B ` + (1 − ri )
B 0 d0j ` fc (t) .
n
∂wj`
∂wi`
α≤β
1
∂Q
it X
αβ
E0 di` D̊d0j ` fc (t) = δij ri D̊`` φc (t) +
cαβ ri E0
D̊d0j ` fc (t) .
(9.18)
q
q
∂di`
α≤β
Plugging (9.18) into (9.16) yields
φ0c (t) = −tE0 Zfc (t) ,
(9.19)
where
X
∂Qαβ
1 X X
(1 − ri )
A wj0 `
cij
cαβ
Z := √
∂wi`
n
i≤j
+ (1 − rj )
α≤β
`
n ∂Qαβ
∂Qαβ
∂Qαβ
di B ` + (1 − ri )
B 0 d0j ` + ri
D̊d0j ` .
∂wj`
∂wi`
q ∂di`
(9.20)
Now, note that
√
√
∂Qαβ
= δαi n A wβ0 ` + (B 0 d0β )` + δβi n wα A ` + (dα B)` ,
∂wi`
√
√
∂Qαβ
= δαi n Bwβ0 ` + D̊d0β ` + δβi n wα B 0 ` + dα D̊ ` .
∂di`
(9.21)
Substituting (9.21) into (9.20), and using Lemma 8.2, together with the bounds kA k, kBk, kDk ≤
C with overwhelming probability on D, it is not difficult to get
X
1
1
Z=
c2ij (1 + δij ) (1 − ri )(1 − rj ) tr A 2 + (ri (1 − rj ) + rj (1 − ri )) tr BB 0
n
q
i≤j
n
+ 2 ri rj tr D̊ 2 + op (1) =: s2n + op (1).
(9.22)
q
Plugging (9.22) into (9.19) , we get
φ0c (t) = −ts2n φc (t) + op (1).
(9.23)
This implies that Qij ’s (c.f. (9.13)) are asymptotically independent Gaussians (up to symmetry),
and the limiting variance of Qij is given by the limit of
1
1
n
(1 − ri )(1 − rj ) tr A 2 + (ri (1 − rj ) + rj (1 − ri )) tr BB 0 + 2 ri rj tr D̊ 2 .
n
q
q
Hence, in the sequel, it suffices to estimate the normalized traces of A 2 , BB 0 , and D̊ 2 . The
result is formulated in the following lemma, whose proof will be also postponed to Appendix A.
34
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
Lemma 9.3. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.10 hold. For any j ∈ {1, . . . , k0 }
such that rj is well separated from rc and 1, we have
1
tr A 2 = −(1 − γj )2 s(γj ) + γj (1 − γj )2 s0 (γj ) + γj2 (1 − c1 ) + (1 − 2γj )c2 + op (1),
n
γj (1 − γj ) 0
1
1
s (γj ) + op (1),
tr BB 0 = (1 − γj )2 1 − s(γj ) +
q
c2
c2
(γj − 1)2 (2c2 − 1)
1
c1 − c2
+
γj +
s(γj )
tr D̊ 2 = (1 − γj )2 − c1 + c2 +
q
c2
c2
c2
1 + (c2 − 1)γj (1 − γj ) 2
γj (1 − γj )2 0
−
s
(γ
)
+
s
(γ
)
+ op (1).
(9.24)
j
j
c2
c22
With the above lemma and (9.23), we conclude the proof of Lemma 6.2.
9.3. Proof of Lemma 6.3. It is equivalent to show the following lemma.
Lemma 9.4. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 1.10 hold. For any j ∈ {1, . . . , k0 }
such that rj is well separated from rc and 1, we have
1
1
tr A (γj ) = c2 − (1 + c1 )γj − (1 − γj )s(γj ) + op ( √ ),
n
n
1
1
tr D(γj ) = (1 − γj )(1 − c1 − %(γj )) + op ( √ ).
q
n
(9.25)
Proof. The results follows from Lemma 8.4, (8.17) and (8.21) immediately.
With Lemma 9.4, we can conclude the proof of Lemma 6.3 easily from the definitions in (5.3)
and (8.23).
35
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
APPENDIX A
In this appendix, we prove Lemma 8.1, Lemma 8.4, Lemma 9.1, Lemma 9.2, and Lemma 9.3.
Proof of Lemma 8.1. Let ui ’ be the i-th row of Uy . We only state the details for the proof
of the case k = 2. For general fixed k, the proof is just a straightforward extension. It is well
known that a Haar orthogonal matrix can be obtained from a Gaussian matrix with i.i.d. entries
via Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization. Especially, there exists a pair of i.i.d. Gaussian vectors
g1 , g2 ∈ Rq with i.i.d. N (0, 1q ) entries, such that
g
g2 − hg2 , g1 i kgg11k2
1
,
.
(u1 , u2 ) =
kg1 k kg2 − hg2 , g1 i kgg11k2 k
(A.1)
K
Using Lemma 8.2, it is elementary to see that kgi k2 − 1 = O( (lognn) ) and
kgi k = 1 −
1
(log n)K
kgi k2 − 1 + O(
),
2
n
g1 Ag20 = O(
(log n)K
√
)
n
(A.2)
hold with overwhelming probability, for any q × q matrix A independent of gi ’s with kAkHS ≤
√
C n. Hence, for any d ∈ Rq independent of ui ’s, with kdk ≤ C, we have
1
(log n)K
(log n)K
2
ui d = 1 − kgi k − 1 + O(
) gi d0 = gi d0 + O(
),
2
n
n
0
(A.3)
with overwhelming probability. This proves the first approximation in Lemma 8.1 if we regard
the columns of BW10 as d0 above.
For the second approximation in Lemma 8.1 , we again use (A.1) and (A.2) to see that
1
(log n)K 2
ui Du0i = 1 − kgi k2 − 1 + O(
) gi Dgi0 ,
2
n
(log n)K
(log n)K
u1 Du2 = (1 + O( √
))g1 Dg20 − (1 + O( √
))g1 g20 g1 Dg10 .
n
n
(A.4)
Hence, with overwhelming probability, we have
1
(log n)K
tr D + O(
),
q
n
1
(log n)K
u1 Du2 = g1 Dg20 − g1 g20 tr D + O(
).
q
n
ui Du0i = gi Dgi0 − kgi k2 − 1
This proves the second approximation in Lemma 8.1 in case of k = 2.
For more general fixed k, it suffices to write (u1 , . . . , uk ) in terms of (g1 , . . . , gk ), using GramSchmidt orthogonalization. The proof is analogous. We omit the details. Hence, we completed
the proof of Lemma 8.1 .
Proof of Lemma 8.4. Recall (8.8). It is elementary to check the first estimate of (8.24).
For the second estimate, we use the fact
−1
ΦE = (E + H)−1 E − z
(E + H)−1 E = (Cw2 y − z)−1 Cw2 y ,
(A.5)
from which we have
1
1
1
1
tr EΦ = tr (Cw2 y − z)−1 Cw2 y = c1 + z tr (Cw2 y − z)−1 + O( ).
n
n
n
n
(A.6)
36
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
Recall š(z) defined in (5.5). Now we claim that for any small constant ε > 0,
1
šn (z) := tr (Cw2 y − z)−1 = š(z) + Op (n−1+ε ).
p
(A.7)
for any z ∈ D. This together with (5.5) and (A.6) implies that
1
tr EΦ = s(z) + Op (n−1+ε )
n
(A.8)
for any z ∈ D.
Hence, what remains is to show (A.7). To this end, we first focus on a sub domain of D:
n
o
1
D+ ≡ D+ (δ) := z ∈ C : d+ + δ < <z ≤ 2, ≤ |=z| ≤ 1
n
Note that for z ∈ D+ , the imaginary part of z is away from 0 by at least
trivial bound
sup
z∈D+
1
n.
Then, we have the
(Cw2 y − z)−1 ≤ n,
(A.9)
deterministically. Further, since the event Ξ1 (c.f. (5.6)) holds with overwhelming probability, it
is easy to see that
sup (Cw2 y − z)−1 ≤ C,
(A.10)
z∈D
with overwhelming probability.
The deterministic bound and the high probability event (A.10) together implies that
sup E (Cw2 y − z)−1
`
≤ C`
(A.11)
z∈D+
for some positive constant C` , for any given ` ∈ N. Further, we introduce a smooth cutoff
function
1
1
(A.12)
Q ≡ Q(E, H) = χ tr (E + H)−1 = χ tr Sw−12 w2 ,
p
p
where χ(x) = 1 if 0 ≤ x ≤ nε , while χ(x) = 0 if x ≥ nε + 1, and |χ0 (x)| ≤ C for all x ∈
[nε , nε + 1]. From (3.3), we see that p1 tr Sw−12 w2 = O(1) with overwhelming probability. Hence,
Q = 1 with overwhelming probability. In turn, we see that Q = 1 implies deterministically that
kSw−12 w2 k = O(n1+ε ).
Now, to prove (A.7) for a given z ∈ D+ , it suffices to show the following two
Var(šn (z)Q) = O(
1
),
n2
1
E(šn (z)Q) = š(z) + o( √ )
n
(A.13)
since Q = 1 with overwhelming probability. We first show the variance bound above. We write
E = XX∗ ,
H = YY∗ ,
X = (xij )p−k,q ,
Y = (yij )p−k,n−q ,
and all xij ’s and yij ’s are i.i.d. N (0, n1 ). We then regard šn (z)Q = p1 tr EΦQ as a function of the
Gaussian variables xij ’s and yij ’s. Using Poincaré inequality for Gaussian, we have
1
1
1 X ∂ p tr EΦ(z) Q 2 X ∂ p tr EΦ(z) Q 2
Var(šn (z)) ≤ E
+
.
(A.14)
n
∂xij
∂yαβ
i,j
α,β
37
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
Observe that
∂ ( p1 tr EΦ)Q
∂xij
1
(XΦ)ji + (ΦX)ij + z XΦEΦ ji + z ΦEΦX ij Q
p
1
1
+ Sw−22 w2 X
− 2 tr EΦχ0 tr Sw−12 w2
X∗ Sw−22 w2
p
p
ij
ji
=
Then it is not difficult to see that
1
3
1 X ∂ p tr EΦ(z) 2
C X
E
≤ 2E
kEkα kΦkα+1 Q2
n
∂xij
n
α=1
i,j
2
1
1
C
+ 2 E kEk2 kSw−12 w2 k4 ( tr EΦ)χ0 tr Sw−12 w2
n
p
p
(A.15)
for some positive constant C. Note that Q =
6 0 only when p1 tr Sw−12 w2 ≤ nε + 1, and similarly
χ0 p1 tr Sw−12 w2 6= 0 only if p1 tr Sw−12 w2 ∈ [nε , nε + 1]. Hence, if the random variables in two expectations are nonzero, we have the bound kSw−12 w2 k = O(n1+ε ). In addition, we also know from
(3.3) that kSw−12 w2 k = O(1) holds with overwhelming probability. These facts imply that
EkSw−12 w2 ka Qb = O(1),
for any fixed a, b > 0. The same bound holds if we replace Q by χ0
is well known that
EkEk` = O(1)
(A.16)
1
−1
p tr Sw2 w2
. Furthermore, it
(A.17)
for any given ` > 0. Then combining the first inequality in (8.19), with (A.11), (A.16) and
(A.17), we can obtain from (A.15) that
1
3
1 X ∂ p tr EΦ(z) Q 2
C X
1
E
≤ 2E
kEkα kΦkα+1 Q2 = O( 2 )
n
∂xij
n
n
i,j
α=1
uniformly in z ∈ D+ . For the second term in (A.14), we can get the same bound analogously.
This completes the proof of the variance estimate in (A.13).
The estimate of mean in (A.13) was obtained in [2] for all
z ∈ w : <w ∈ [d− − c, d+ + c], =w ≥ c
for any small positive constant c. The proof in [2] take the advantages of the lower bound =z ≥ c,
which guarantees an order 1 upper bound of k(Cw2 y − z)−1 k. Here for z ∈ D+ , we have (A.11)
instead. This high order moment bound is sufficient for us to extend the discussion in [2] to the
region D+ easily. Hence we omit the proof of (A.13), and refer to [2] for the interested readers.
Furthermore, using Chebyshev’s inequality, (A.13) and the fact that Q = 1 with overwhelming
probability, we see that for any z ∈ D+
−2+2ε
P |šn (z) − š(z)| ≥ n−ε = O(n
).
Now, we define the lattice S+ = D ∩ (n−ε Z × n−ε iZ), where Z = {±1, ±2, . . .}. Then apparently
](S+ ) = O(n2ε ). This implies that
−2+4ε
P ∪z∈S+ |šn (z) − š(z)| ≥ n−ε
= O(n
).
38
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
In addition, for any z ∈ D, one can find a z 0 ∈ S+ such that |z − z 0 | = O(n−ε ). Then by
continuity of šn (z) and š(z) on D, i.e., |š0n (z)|, |š0 (z)| ≤ η −2 , we can easily get
P ∪z∈D |šn (z) − š(z)| ≥ Cn−ε
= O(n−2+4ε ).
By choosing ε sufficiently small, we can then show that the second estimate in (8.24) holds
uniformly in D if we replace op ( √1n ) by Oa.s. (n−ε ).
Next, we show the third estimate in (8.24). Recall (8.8). We write
H = X X ∗,
E = YY ∗ ,
X = (x̃ij )q,n−p+k ,
Y = (ỹij )q,p−k
(A.18)
and all x̃ij ’s and ỹij ’s are i.i.d. N (0, n1 ). Analogously to the proof of the second estimate in
(8.24), we can prove the result for any fixed z ∈ D+ at first, then extend the proof to whole D
by continuity. For a fixed z ∈ D+ , we again split the proof into two parts
1
1
Var tr Ψ(z)Q̃ = O( 2 ),
q
n
(A.19)
1
1
E tr Ψ(z)Q̃ = %(z) + o( √ ),
q
n
(A.20)
1
1
−1
Q̃(E, H) = χ tr (E + H)−1 = χ tr Syy
.
q
q
(A.21)
and
where
e = 1 with overwhelming probability. The proof of (A.19)
Similarly, here we used the fact that Q
can be obtained by Poincaré inequality again. We omit the details. In the sequel, we show how
to derive (A.20) by integration by parts formula of Gaussian measures. To ease the presentation,
−1 k = O(1) determinwe get rid of the factor Q̃ in the discussion, and do the reasoning as if kSyy
istically. The rigorous justification of the following derivation requires one to put Q̃ back into
each step.
Using the integration by parts formula for Gaussian variables (c.f. (9.17)), we arrive at
q n−p+k
q n−p+k
∗
1
1X X
1 X X ∂ X ΥE
∗
Etr Ψ(z) =
Ex̃ij X ΥE ji =
E
q
q
qn
∂xij
i=1
=
i=1
ji
j=1
q n−p+k
1 X X
E
ΥE ii + z X ∗ ΥX jj ΥE ii + z X ∗ Υ ji X ∗ ΥE ji
qn
i=1
=
j=1
j=1
n−p+k
z
z
Etr EΥ +
Etr HΥ tr EΥ +
Etr HΥEΥ .
qn
qn
qn
(A.22)
Note that for any z ∈ D+ , one has
z
1
Etr HΥEΥ = O( ).
qn
n
(A.23)
Similarly to the variance bound in (A.13), it is not difficult to show
Var
1
1
tr HΥ = O( 2 ),
p
n
Var
1
1
tr EΥ = O( 2 ).
p
n
(A.24)
39
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
To be precise, in order to obtain (A.23) and (A.24), the tracial quantities shall be multiplied by
Q̃. But as we mentioned before, we omit it from the presentation. Combining (A.22)- (A.24),
we have
1
n−p+k
z
1
Etr Ψ(z) =
Etr EΥ +
Etr HΥ Etr EΥ + O( )
q
qn
qn
n
1
n−p+k
1
Etr EΥ +
=
(1 − z)Etr EΥ − q Etr EΥ + O( )
qn
qn
n
n − p + k
1
1−z
1
2
=
Etr EΥ
−
Etr EΥ +
+ O( )
qn
n
qn
n
where we used the fact
zEtr HΥ = (1 − z)Etr EΥ − q.
Analogously to (A.13), we can show
−1
z
1
1
Etr EΥ = Etr Cyw2 − zIq
+ 1 = zs̃(z) + 1 + o( √ ),
q
q
n
where s̃(z) is defined in (3.2). Then by (5.5), we have
1
1
1
Etr EΥ = s(z) + o( √ ).
q
c2
n
(A.25)
Combining the above results we can conclude that for any given z ∈ D+
(1 − c1 − c2 )s(z) + (1 − z)s2 (z)
1
1
1
Etr Ψ(z) =
+ o( √ ) = %(z) + o( √ ).
q
c2
n
n
where we used (5.4). The extension of the result to the whole D and the proof for the uniform
bound are the same as the second estimate in (8.24). We thus omit the details.
This completes the proof of Lemma 8.4.
Proof of Lemma 9.1. Using the fact ((1 − z)E − zH)Φ(z) = I and the second estimate of
Lemma 8.4, we see that
1 − γj
−c1 + (1 − γj )s(γj )
p−k
1
1
tr HΦ(γj ) =
tr EΦ −
=
+ op ( √ ).
n
γj n
γj n
γj
n
(A.26)
Now, observe that
∂ 1
1
tr HΦ(z)
= tr HΦ(γj )W2 W20 Φ(γj )
∂z n
n
z=γj
1
1
=−
tr HΦ(γj ) +
tr HΦ(γj )EΦ(γj )
γj n
γj n
1 1
1
=−
tr HΦ(γj ) +
tr HΦ(γj )HΦ(γj ).
1 − γj n
γj n
(A.27)
Hence, to prove the second and third estimate in Lemma 9.1, it suffices to consider the LHS
of (A.27). Although the limit and differentiation cannot be exchanged in general, here we can
indeed obtain from (A.26) that
∂ 1
tr HΦ(z)
∂z n
z=γj
=
d 1−z
s(z)
dz z
1
z=γj
+ Op (n− 4 ).
(A.28)
40
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
To see this, it suffices to consider the non-limiting ratio
− 14
1
) − Φ(γj ))
1
1
n tr H(Φ(γj + n
= tr HΦ(γj )W2 W20 Φ(γj ) + Op (n− 4 ),
− 41
n
n
(A.29)
which follows by using the expansion (9.2) twice. Applying the estimate in (A.26) to the LHS
of (A.29) leads to (A.28).
Therefore, combining (A.26), (A.27) and (A.28) yields the second and the third estimates in
Lemma 9.1. To prove the last estimate in Lemma 9.1, we can consider the derivative of n1 tr EΦ
instead of n1 tr HΦ and go through the above procedure. We omit the details.
This concludes the proof of Lemma 9.1.
Proof of Lemma 9.2. From the identity (8.14), we have
Ψ = (1 − z)Syw2 ΦSw2 y − E.
Analogously to the proof of the third estimate in (8.16), we can use the spectral decomposition
(6.4). Then we write
Syw2 ΦSw2 y = Uy Λy Vy W20 ΦW2 Vy0 Λ0y Uy0 .
Again, similarly to the Gaussian approximation used in (8.1), we can approximate the α-th row
and β-th column of Uy by Gaussian vectors. Then Lemma 8.2 leads us to the estimates
1
(log n)K
(log n)K
Ψαβ (γj ) = δαβ tr Ψ(γj ) + Op ( √
) = %(γj ) + Op ( √
).
q
n
n
where the last step follows from Lemma 8.4.
Next, for the second estimate in Lemma 9.2, we first notice that
∂
∂
Ψ(γj )(H−1 + E −1 )Ψ(γj ) =
Ψ(z)
=
(1 − z)Syw2 ΦSw2 y
∂z
∂z
z=γj
= −Syw2 ΦSw2 y + (1 − z)Syw2 ΦSw2 w2 ΦSw2 y .
Again, applying the SVD of Y , we can derive
1 ∂
Ψ(γj )(H−1 + E −1 )Ψ(γj )
tr Ψ(z)
= δαβ
q ∂z
αβ
Then similarly to (A.28), we have
Ψ(γj )(H−1 + E −1 )Ψ(γj )
αβ
(A.30)
z=γj
1
z=γj
+ Op (n− 2 +ε )
= δαβ %0 (γj ) + op (1).
This concludes the proof of Lemma 9.2.
Proof of Lemma 9.3. First, we estimate
1
2
n tr A .
From the definition in (4.14), we have
2 1
2
1
1
tr (A (γj ))2 = tr Py − γj + tr (Py − γj )2 W20 Φ(γj )W2
n
n
n
2
− tr (Py − γj )3 W20 Φ(γj )W2 .
n
It is easy to check
2
1
tr Py − γj = (1 − 2γj )c2 + γj2 + op (1).
n
(A.31)
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
41
For the second term of (A.31), using Lemma 9.1 we obtain
2
2
1
1
tr (Py − γj )2 W20 Φ(γj )W2 = tr (1 − γj )2 Φ(γj )E + γj2 Φ(γj )H
n
n
= (1 − γj )(1 − 3γj )s(γj ) + γj (1 − γj )2 s0 (γj ) + γj2 c1 + op (1).
Similarly, we have
1
1
tr (Py − γj In )3 W20 Φ(γj )W2 = tr (1 − γj )3 Φ(γj )E − γj3 Φ(γj )H
n
n
= (1 − γj )(1 − 2γj )s(γj ) + γj2 c1 + op (1).
Substituting the above results to (A.31), we get the first estimate in (9.24).
Next, we investigate 1q tr BB 0 . From the definition in (6.6), it is elementary to check
tr BB 0 = (1 − γj )2 tr Syy − Syw2 ΦSw2 y + (γj − γj2 )Syw2 ΦSw2 w2 ΦSw2 y .
(A.32)
Recall (8.14). Then, with overwhelming probability, we have
c1 + %(γj )
1
1 1
tr Syw2 Φ(γj )Sw2 y =
tr E + Ψ(γj ) =
+ op (1),
q
1 − γj q
1 − γj
(A.33)
by (8.8) and Lemma 8.4.
Observe that
Syw2 Φ(z)Sw2 w2 Φ(z)Sw2 y =
∂
∂
Syw2 Φ(z)Sw2 y =
zSyy Υ(z)Syy ,
∂z
∂z
(A.34)
where in the last step we used (8.6). Using (8.11) and (8.13), we see that
∂
∂ z
1
zSyy Υ(z)Syy =
E −H+
Ψ(z)
∂z
∂z 1 − z
1−z
1
1
1
=
E+
Ψ(z) +
Ψ(z) E −1 + H−1 Ψ(z).
2
2
(1 − z)
(1 − z)
1−z
(A.35)
Furthermore, from Lemma 9.2 we have
1
1
tr E = c1 + op (1),
tr Ψ(γj ) = %(γj ) + op (1),
q
q
1
tr Ψ(γj ) E −1 + H−1 Ψ(γj ) = %0 (γj ) + op (1).
q
(A.36)
Combining (A.34), (A.35) and (A.36) yields
c1 + %(γj )
%0 (γj )
1
tr Syw2 Φ(γj )Sw2 w2 Φ(γj )Sw2 y =
+
+ op (1).
q
(1 − γj )2
1 − γj
(A.37)
Therefore, we get the second estimate in (9.24) by substituting (A.33) and (A.37) into (A.32).
At the end, we prove the last estimate in Lemma 9.3. Note that
2
1
1
tr Dn2 = (1 − γj2 ) tr Syy − (1 − γj )Syw2 ΦSw2 y
q
q
1
2
1
2
1
= (1 − γj )2 tr H − Ψ = (1 − γj )2 tr H2 − tr HΨ + tr Ψ2 .
q
q
q
q
(A.38)
42
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
First, it is not difficult to check
1
c2
p
(1 − c1 )2 = (1 − c1 + c2 )(1 − c1 ).
tr H2 −→ 1 +
q
1 − c1
(A.39)
We further claim that
1
1
1 − c1 − c1 c2
(1 − γj )s(γj ) + (1 − γj )2 s2 (γj ) − c1 (1 − c1 ) + op (1),
tr HΨ =
q
c2
c2
γ (γ − 1)
1
− c1 − c2
1
j j
− 2c1 (1 − γj ) +
(1 − 2γj ) s(γj )
tr Ψ2 =
q
c2
c2
2
(1 − γj )(2 − 3γj ) 2
γj (1 − γj ) 0
+
s (γj ) +
s (γj ) − (1 − c1 − c2 )c1 + op (1).
c2
c2
(A.40)
The proof of (A.40) will be postponed to the end. Consequently, we have
γj (γj − 1)
1
1 − c1 − c2
2
2
− 2(1 − γj ) −
s(γj )
tr Dn = (1 − γj )
1 − c1 + c2 +
q
c2
c2
γj (1 − γj ) 2
γj (1 − γj )2 0
−
s (γj ) +
s (γj ) + op (1).
c2
c2
In addition, we see that
1 − γj
1
1
tr Dn = (1 − γj ) tr H − Ψ = (1 − γj ) 1 −
s(γj ) + op (1).
q
q
c2
Then, by definition, we get the last estimate in (9.3).
Hence, what remains is to prove (A.40). Analogously to the proof of Lemma 8.4, by continuity,
we can work with
γ̃j = γj + i
1
∈ D+
n
instead of γj . Recall Q̃ defined in (A.21). Similarly to (A.13), also (A.19) and (A.20), we can
split the tasks into two steps: first, we show that
1
1
1
1
Var
tr HΨ(γ̃j ) Q̃ = O( 2 ),
Var
tr Ψ2 (γ̃j ) Q̃ = O( 2 )
(A.41)
q
n
q
n
and then we estimate E 1q tr HΨ(γ̃j ) Q̃ and E 1q tr Ψ2 (γ̃j ) Q̃ . The proof of (A.41) is analogous to the proof
of
(A.13). Hence, we omit
it. In the sequel, we briefly state the estimates
of E 1q tr HΨ(γ̃j ) Q̃ and E 1q tr Ψ2 (γ̃j ) Q̃ , using integration by parts formula for Gaussian
measure. Again, for brevity, we get rid of the factor Q̃ in the discussion, and do the reasoning
−1 k = O(1) deterministically. A rigorous justification of the following derivation requires
as if kSyy
one to put Q̃ back into each step.
To ease the presentation, we omit γ̃j from the notations in the following discussions. First,
from (9.8) we have
1
1
tr HΨ = tr H2 ΥE,
q
q
2
1
1
tr Ψ2 = tr HΥE .
q
q
We use integration by parts (c.f. (9.17)) again. Recall (A.18). We have
1
1X
Etr H2 ΥE =
Exαβ X 0 HΥE βα
q
q
α,β
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
=
43
1 X
E HΥE αα + X 0 βα X 0 ΥE βα + X 0 X ββ ΥE αα
qn
α,β
+ γj X 0 HΥ βα (X 0 ΥE)βα + X 0 HΥX ββ ΥE αα
n−p+k1
1
1
1
Etr HΥE +
Etr H tr EΥ + γj Etr H2 Υ tr EΥ + O( )
n
q
qn
qn
n
1
1
1
n−p+k1
Etr HΥE +
Etr H Etr EΥ + γj Etr H2 Υ Etr EΥ + O( ),
=
n
q
qn
qn
n
=
where the last step follows from the variance bounds O( n12 ) for all the normalized tracial quantities above. The proofs of these variance bounds are again similar to the proof of the first bound
in (A.13).
Now, note that three terms on the RHS above can be computed easily. More specifically, we
first recall (A.25). Then, we also note that
1
1
Etr HΥE = Etr Ψ(γj ) = %(γj ) + o(1)
q
q
(A.42)
and
1 − γj
1
1
Etr H2 Υ(γj ) =
Etr HΥ(γj )(γj H − (1 − γj )E) +
Etr HΥ(γj )E
n
γj n
γj n
1 − γj
c2 (c1 − 1) 1 − γj
1
Etr H +
Etr Ψ(γj ) =
+
c2 %(γj ) + o(1).
=−
γj n
γj n
γj
γj
Hence, we have
1
1
Etr H2 ΥE = (1 − c1 ) + (1 − γj )s(γj ) %(γj ) + O( )
q
n
1 − c1 − c1 c2
1
=
(1 − γj )s(γj ) + (1 − γj )2 s2 (γj ) − c1 (1 − c1 ) + o(1).
c2
c2
Analogously, after a tedious calculation using integration by parts, we will get
1
1X
Etr Ψ2 =
Exαβ X 0 ΥEHΥE
q
q
βα
α,β
1
1
n−p+k1
Etr HΥEΥE +
Etr HΥE Etr EΥ + z Etr HΥ Etr HΥEΥE
=
n
q
qn
qn
1
1
+ z Etr HΥHΥE Etr EΥ + O( ).
qn
n
(A.43)
The tracial quantities on the RHS can now be computed. For example, the terms like HΥEΥE
can be obtained via taking derivative of HΥE. More specifically, we have
∂ 1
1
Etr HΥ(z)E
= Etr HΥ(γj ) E + H Υ(γj )E
∂z q
q
z=γj
1 1
1 1
=
Etr HΥ(γj )E +
Etr HΥ(γj )HΥ(γj )E
1 − γj q
1 − γj q
1 1
1 1
=−
Etr HΥ(γj )E +
Etr HΥ(γj )EΥ(γj )E.
γj q
γj q
From the above and (A.42), we get
1
Etr HΥ(γj )HΥ(γj )E = (1 − γj )%0 (γj ) − %(γj ) + o(1)
q
44
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
=−
(1 − γj )2 0
2(1 − γj )
s(γj ) +
s (γj ) + c1 + o(1),
c2
c2
1
Etr HΥ(γj )EΥ(γj )E = γj %0 (γj ) + %(γj ) + o(1)
q
γj (1 − γj ) 0
1 − 2γj
s(γj ) +
s (γj ) − c1 + o(1).
=
c2
c2
Further, we recall (A.25), from which we also have
1 − γj
1
1
s(γj ) + o(1).
Etr HΥ = − +
q
γj
c2 γj
Plugging all these estimates into (A.43), we get
1 − c − c
γj (1 − γj )2
2(1 − γj )(1 − 2γj ) 2
1
1
2
s (γj ) +
γj (1 − γj ) + 2
s(γj ) s0 (γj )
Etr Ψ2 (γj ) =
q
c2
c2
c2
1 − c1 − c2
+ − 2c1 (1 − γj ) +
(1 − 2γj ) s(γj ) + o(1).
(A.44)
c2
Taking the derivative for (5.4), one can derive
2(γj − 1)s(γj )s0 (γj ) = −s2 (γj ) + s(γj ) − (c1 + c2 − γj )s0 (γj )
(A.45)
Using (A.45) to (A.44), we obtain the second estimate in (A.40).
This completes the proof of Lemma 9.3.
APPENDIX B
In this section, we prove Lemma 7.3. First, from Lemma 5.1, (Mn )ij (z) can be approximated
by δij mi (z) up to an error O(n−ε ) if z ∈ D. We now claim that this approximation also holds
e we set for any τ > 0, ε0 the domain
in the following domain D:
n
o
e ≡ D(δ,
e ε0 ) := z = x + iη : d+ − δ ≤ x ≤ 1 − δ, n−1+ε0 ≤ η ≤ 1 .
D
Lemma B.1. For any small positive constants and δ and ε0 , there exists some positive constant c > 0, such that
sup
|(Mn )ij (z) − δij mi (z)| ≤ n−c
sup
e i,j=1,...,k
z∈D
in probability.
For simplicity, in the sequel, we denote
η0 = n−1+ε0 .
To prove Lemma B.1, we need a local law for the Stieltjes transform of MANOVA matrix.
Recall š(z) from (3.1). We also recall the Stieltjes transform šn (z) from (A.7).
Lemma B.2 (Local law of MONOVA at the right edge).
we have
For any small δ > 0 and ε0 > 0,
0
Nε
šn (z) − š(z) ≤
Nη
e with overwhelming probability, for any small constant ε0 > 0.
uniformly on D
(B.1)
45
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
Proof. Observe that
((E + H)−1 E − z)−1 = ((1 − z)H −1 E − zI)−1 (I + H −1 E)
−1
z
1
1
−1
H
E
−
I
+
I.
=
2
(1 − z)
1−z
1−z
Hence, by (8.9) and (A.7) we have
šn (z) =
1
z
1
1
ŝ
+
+ O( ),
n
(1 − z)2
1−z
1−z
n
(B.2)
where
−1
1
ŝn (ω) := tr H −1 E − ω
p
z
) ∼ =z when <z ∈ [d+ −
is the Stieltjes transform of the F matrix H −1 E. Observe that =( 1−z
−1
δ, 1 − δ]. A local law for ŝn (ω) at the right edge of H E with =ω ≥ η0 has been proved in [26]
(see Theorem 7.1 therein). Then by (B.2), Lemma B.2 follows immediately.
Denoting by γ
ei ≡ γ
en,i the i-th largest n-quantile of f (x) in (1.6), i.e.,
Z
γ
ei
f (x)dx =
d−
n−i+1
.
n
Corollary B.3 (Rigidity of eigenvalues near the right edge).
B.2, there exists some c ≡ c(δ) ∈ (0, 1) such that
2
1
0
ei − γ
λ
ei ≤ nε n− 3 i− 3 ,
(B.3)
For any small δ in Lemma
∀i = 1, . . . , bcnc.
(B.4)
holds with overwhelming probability, for any small constant ε0 > 0
Proof. Denoting by λ̂1 ≥ λ̂2 ≥ · · · λ̂p−k the ordered eigenvalues of the F matrix H −1 E.
Observe that Cw2 y = (E + H)−1 E = H −1 E(H −1 E + I)−1 . Hence, we have
ei =
λ
λ̂i
1 + λ̂i
.
Further we set γ̂i to be the solution to
γ
ei =
2
γ̂i
.
1 + γ̂i
0
In [26], it is proved that |λ̂1 − γ̂1 | ≤ n− 3 +ε with overwhelming probability. This implies directly
that
2
0
e1 − γ
λ
e1 ≤ n− 3 +ε .
(B.5)
with overwhelming probability. The rigidity for general i then follows from (B.5), Lemma B.2,
and the square root decay of the density function in (1.6). The proof is standard, we omit the
details. For interested readers, we refer to the proof of Theorem 2.2 in [17].
With the aid of Lemma B.2, we are now at the stage to prove Lemma B.1.
46
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
Proof of Lemma B.1. Here we only need to argue that the proof of Lemma 5.1 still works
e It suffices to go through the proofs of Lemmas 8.1, 8.3 and 8.4 again, with the
well for z ∈ D.
aid of Lemma B.2 and Corollary B.3.
First, analogously to Lemma 8.1, we will show that
1
1
M2 = T G1 BW10 + O(n− 2 +2ε0 ),
M3 = T G1 DG01 T10 + O(n− 2 +2ε0 ),
(B.6)
e Here the second term on the RHS of the second
hold with overwhelming probability on D.
1
equation in (8.15) has been absorbed into the error term O(n− 2 +2ε0 ). Similarly to the proof of
Lemma 8.1, we only show the details for the case of k = 2. Recall (A.3) and (A.4). Denote by
w` the `-th column of W1 . It suffices to show that with overwhelming probability,
g1 D(z)g10 = O(nε0 ),
g1 D(z)g20 = O(nε0 ),
gi0 B(z)wj = O(nε0 )
(B.7)
e We only show the proof for the first two estimates above. The last one can be
hold for z ∈ D.
checked analogously. We use Lemma 8.2 again. For the first two estimates in (B.7), it suffices to
show that
1
tr D(z) = O(nε0 ),
n
ε0
1
1
kD(z)k2HS = 2 tr D(z)(D(z))∗ = O(n− 2 )
2
n
n
(B.8)
e We start with the first estimate in (B.8). From the
hold with overwhelming probability on D.
first equation of (8.21) and (8.3), we have
1
1
1
| tr D(z)| ≤ |1 − z|| tr Syy | + |1 − z|2 | tr Syw2 Φ(z)Sw2 y |
n
n
n
1
ew y − z|
≤ C 1 + tr |C
2
n
ew y has the same eigenwith overwhelming probability, where we also used (3.3). Observe that C
2
e
values as Cw2 y . Hence, we have on D,
p−k
X
1
1
ew y − z| = 1
tr |C
= O((log n)K )
2
e
n
n
|λi − z|
(B.9)
i=1
with overwhelming probability, for some sufficiently large K > 0. The proof of (B.9) from
Corollary B.3 is standard. We refer to the proof of (3.43) in [7] for a similar argument.
For the second estimate, we have
1
1
1
tr D(z)(D(z))∗ ≤ |1 − z|| 2 tr Syy (D(z))∗ | + |1 − z|2 | 2 tr Syw2 Φ(z)Sw2 y (D(z))∗ |
2
n
n
n
By Von Neumann’s trace inequality, we can easily get
1
1
C
tr Syy (D(z))∗ ≤ 2 tr Syy k(D(z))∗ kop ≤
= Cn−ε0
2
n
n
nη0
with overwhelming probability. Analogously, using (3.3), (8.3) and (B.9), we have
ε
1
C
∗
ew y − z| ≤ n− 20
tr
S
Φ(z)S
(D(z))
|
≤
tr
|
C
yw
w
y
2
2
2
n2
n2 η 0
with overwhelming probability.
e Specifically, we shall
Next, we shall check that an analogue of Lemma 8.3 holds as well on D.
e
show, that on D, the following estimates hold with overwhelming probability.
ε0
1
sup (M1 )ij − δij c2 − (1 + c1 )z − (1 − z) tr EΦ
≤ n− 8 ,
n
i,j
47
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
ε0
1
sup (M3 )ij − δij t2i (1 − z) tr (H − Ψ) ≤ n− 8 .
q
i,j
ε0
sup (M2 )ij ≤ n− 8 ,
i,j
(B.10)
Similarly to the proof of Lemma 8.3, we start with (6.7) and (B.6) and use the large deviation
inequality in Lemma 8.2. It suffices to show that
ε0
1
kA k2HS ≤ n− 2 ,
2
n
ε0
1
kBk2HS ≤ n− 2 ,
2
n
ε0
1
kDk2HS ≤ n− 2
2
n
(B.11)
e with overwhelming probability. Note that the last estimate of (B.11) has already
holds on D
been proved in (B.8). The first two can be proved analogously. We thus omit the details.
e as well. Apparently,
At the end, we show that an analogue of Lemma 8.4 holds on the domain D
the first estimate in (8.24) still holds. In the sequel, we will show that
ε0
1
sup | tr EΦ(z) − s(z)| ≤ n− 2 ,
e n
z∈D
ε0
1
sup | tr Ψ(z) − %(z)| ≤ n− 2 .
e q
z∈D
(B.12)
with overwhelming probability. Note that the first estimate in (B.12) follows from (A.6) and
Lemma B.2 by choosing ε0 = ε20 therein.
Fo the second estimate in (B.12), we first define
P ≡ P(z) :=
1
1
tr Syy Υ(z)Syy − tr Υ(z)Syy .
n
n
(B.13)
Our aim is to show that
1
sup |P(z)| ≤ Cn− 2
(B.14)
e
z∈D
with overwhelming probability.
We postpone the proof of (B.14) to the end, and show how to prove the second estimate in
(B.12) with the aid of (B.14). First, from (8.6), (8.9) and (8.14), we can write
Ψ(z) = z(1 − z)Syy ΥSyy + (1 − z)H − zE.
Hence, from (B.13) and (B.14), we have
1
1
1
1
1
tr Ψ(z) = z(1 − z) tr Υ(z)Syy + (1 − z) tr H − z tr E + O(n− 2 )
q
q
q
q
(B.15)
e with overwhelming probability. It is elementary to see that
on D,
1
1
tr H = 1 − c1 + O(n− 2 +ε ),
q
1
1
tr E = c1 + O(n− 2 +ε )
q
(B.16)
with overwhelming probability. Furthermore, according to (8.9) and (8.10), we can write
−1
1
1
tr Υ(z)Syy = tr Cyw2 − z
=: s̃n (z).
q
q
(B.17)
Since Cw2 y and Cyw2 share the same nonzero eigenvalues, in light of (A.7), we have
c1
c2 − c1 1
šn (z) = s̃n (z) +
.
c2
c2 z
(B.18)
48
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
From (5.5), we also have
c2 − c1 1
c1
š(z) = s̃(z) +
.
c2
c2 z
(B.19)
Hence, combining (B.1), (B.18) and (B.19) yields
0
sup s̃n (z) − s̃(z) ≤
e
z∈D
Nε
.
N η0
(B.20)
Plugging (B.17), (B.20) and (B.16) into (B.15), we can get (B.12) easily by choosing ε0 = ε20 .
Hence, what remains is to prove (B.14). It suffices to show the one point estimate for any
e The uniform bound follows from the continuity and the definition of overwhelming
given z ∈ D.
probability. More specifically, similarly to the proof of Lemma 8.4, we introduce the lattice
e ∩ (n−3 Z × n−3 Z). According to the definition of with overwhelming probability, we see
Se := D
1
that if we can prove |P(z)| ≤ n− 2 for any z ∈ Se with overwhelming probability individually, we
1
also have the uniform bound supz∈Se |P(z)| ≤ n− 2 with overwhelming probability. Moreover, for
e there is one z ∈ Se such that |z − z 0 | ≤ n−3 . Further, we have the following bound
any z 0 ∈ D,
e
uniformly in all z ∈ D
|P0 (z)| ≤ CkΥ0 (z)k = O(
1
) = O(n2 ),
η02
(B.21)
−1 k ≤ C, which itself holds with overwhelming probability.
conditioning on the event kSyy k, kSyy
By the continuity in (B.21), we can further obtain (B.14) from (B.21).
1
e For brevity,
Therefore, in the sequel, we only show the proof of |P(z)| ≤ n− 2 for one z ∈ D.
we omit z from the notation. We estimate the high order moments of P. To this end, we set
H(m1 , m2 ) = Pm1 P
m2
.
With this notation, we can write
1
1
EH(m, m) = E tr Syy ΥSyy H(m − 1, m) − E tr ΥSyy H(m − 1, m).
n
n
(B.22)
We apply the Gaussian integral by parts (c.f. (9.17)) to the first term above. Then we get
1
1X
E tr Syy ΥSyy H(m − 1, m) =
E yij Y 0 ΥSyy ji H(m − 1, m)
n
n
i,j
= E c1 H(m − 1, m) + E c2 H(m − 2, m) + E c3 H(m − 1, m − 1)
(B.23)
where
0
1 X ∂ Y ΥSyy
c1 = 2
n
∂yij
ji
,
i,j
c2 =
P
1 X 0
Y
ΥS
,
yy
ji ∂y
n2
ij
i,j
P
1 X 0
c3 = 2
Y ΥSyy ji
.
n
∂yij
i,j
The estimates of c2 and c3 all nearly the same. We thus focus on the former. By elementary
calculation, it is not difficult to derive
1 X
c1 = 2
(ΥSyy )ii − (Y 0 Υ)ji (Pw2 − z)Y 0 ΥSyy ji
n
i,j
49
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
− Y 0 ΥY (Pw2 − z) jj (ΥSyy )ii + (Y 0 Υ)ji yij + (Y 0 ΥY )jj
1
1
= tr ΥSyy − 2 tr ΥY (Pw2 − z)Y 0 ΥSyy
n
n
1
1
q
− 2 tr ΥY (Pw2 − z)Y 0 tr ΥSyy + 2 tr ΥSyy + 2 tr ΥSyy
n
n
n
1
= tr ΥSyy .
n
(B.24)
where in the last step we used the definition of Υ in (8.1). Similarly, we can derive
c2 =
2
2
2
tr Syy
ΥSyy Υ = 3 tr Syy (Cyw2 − z)−2
3
n
n
(B.25)
Further, substituting (B.23) and (B.24) into (B.22), we have
EH(m, m) = E c2 H(m − 2, m) + E c3 H(m − 1, m − 1)
Now, by Young’s inequality, we have
EH(m, m) ≤
2(m − 1)
(log n)m
1
E|c2 |m + E|c3 |m +
m EH(m, m).
m
m
(log n) m−1
This implies that
EH(m, m) ≤ C
(log n)m
E|c2 |m + E|c3 |m .
m
(B.26)
Using (B.25), we see that
1
E|c2 |m ≤ (EkSyy k2m ) 2 (E(
1
2
tr |Cyw2 − z|−2 )2m ) 2 .
3
n
(B.27)
Applying (B.20) and the fact s̃(z) = O(1), we observe that
1
1 1
c2
tr |Cyw2 − z|−2 = 2
=tr (Cyw2 − z)−1 = 2 =s̃n (z) = O(n−1−ε0 )
n3
n ηn
n η
(B.28)
e with overwhelming probability. Moreover, we also have the deterministic bound
on D
1
1
tr |Cyw2 − z|−2 = O( 2 2 ) = O(n−2ε0 ).
3
n
n η0
Hence, we have
(E(
ε0
1
1
tr |Cyw2 − z|−2 )2m ) 2 ≤ n−m(1+ 2 )
3
n
(B.29)
Using (3.3), we also have
1
(EkSyy k2m ) 2 ≤ K m
(B.30)
for some positive constant K. Plugging (B.29) and (B.30) into (B.27), we obtain
ε0
E|c2 |m ≤ n−m(1+ 4 ) .
The same bound holds for c3 . Hence, we obtain from (B.26) that
E|P|2m = EH(m, m) ≤ n−m .
1
Since m can be arbitrary fixed positive integer, we get |P(z)| ≤ n− 2 with overwhelming probae
bility for any z ∈ D.
This completes the proof of Lemma B.1.
50
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
With the aid of Lemma B.1, Lemma B.2, and Corollary B.3, we prove Lemma 7.3.
Proof of Lemma 7.3. For any z ∈ Ω, we set z0 = z + iη0 , where η0 = n−1+ε0 . Our strategy
is to compare Mn (z) with Mn (z0 ), and use Lemma B.1 to conclude Lemma 7.3. We first show
that
sup |(Mn )ij (z0 ) − (Mn )ij (z)| ≤ n−c
(B.31)
z∈Ω
with overwhelming probability. To see this, we first observe from (4.13) that
Mn (z0 ) − Mn (z) = Z1 A (z0 ) − A (z) Z1 .
For i = 0, . . . , 4, let Ai (z0 , z) be the matrices obtained via replacing (λj , γj ) by (z0 , z) in Ai
defined in (9.4). Similarly to (9.3), we have
Mn (z0 ) − Mn (z) = iη0
4
X
Z1 Aa (z0 , z)Z1 .
a=0
Since A0 (z0 , z) = −In , apparently we have
η0 Z1 A0 (z0 , z)Z1
ij
= O(n−1+ε0 )
with overwhelming probability, by simply using the definition of Z1 in (4.14) and Lemma 8.2.
Hence, it suffices to show the estimate the entries of η0 Z1 Aa (z0 , z)Z1 for a = 1, . . . , 4. In the
sequel, we only present the details for a = 1. The others can be handled similarly. From the
definitions of Z1 (c.f. (4.14)) and A1 (z0 , z), it suffices to estimate the entries of
η0 W1 A1 (z0 , z)W10 ,
η0 T1 Y A1 (z0 , z)W10 ,
η0 T1 Y A1 (z0 , z)Y 0 T10 .
(B.32)
For the first term, observe that W1 is independent of A1 (z0 , z), and also the event Ω. Hence, by
Lemma 8.2, we have
η0 W1 A1 (z0 , z)W10
ij
=
δij (1 − ri )
(log n)K
tr
A
(z
,
z)
+
O
kA
(z
,
z)k
1
0
1
0
HS
2−ε
2−ε
n 0
n 0
uniformly on Ω, with overwhelming probability. Note that by the definition of the domain Ω in
(7.3), we see that supz∈Ω kCw2 y − zk ≤ n1−ε . This together with (3.3), (8.3) and (B.9) implies
that
1
n2−ε0
|tr A1 (z0 , z)| =
≤
1
n2−ε0
1
|tr Py W20 Φ(z)W2 W20 Φ(z0 )W2 Py |
K
ew y − z0 |−1 = O( (log n) )
tr |C
2
1−ε
+ε
0
n
nε−ε0
holds with overwhelming probability, where in the second step we bounded all the matrices
ew y − z0 )−1 by their operator norms. Similarly, we have
except (C
2
(log n)2K
(log n)2K
2
kA
(z
,
z)k
≤
C
kΦ(z)k2 tr Φ(z0 )Φ(z0 )
1
0
HS
4−2ε
0
n
n4−2ε0
K
(log n)2K
ew y − z0 |−2 = O( (log n) )
≤ C 2−2ε0 +2ε tr |C
2
n
n2ε−3ε0
with overwhelming probability, where in the last step we used (B.28). Choosing ε > 3ε0 (say),
we obtain
η0 W1 A1 (z0 , z)W10 ij = O(n−ε0 )
(B.33)
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
51
with overwhelming probability.
For the entries of the last two matrices in (B.32), we first do the approximation by choosing
ε > 3ε0 (say)
η0 T1 Y A1 (z0 , z)W10 = η0 T G1 Λy Vy A1 (z0 , z)W10 + O(n−ε0 ),
η0 T1 Y A1 (z0 , z)Y 0 T10 = η0 T G1 A1 (z0 , z)G01 T + O(n−ε0 ).
(B.34)
The proof of the above estimates is similar to (B.6). We omit the details. The estimates of the
entries of the first term on the RHS of two equations in (B.34) can be derived in the same way
as (B.33), using Lemma 8.2. We thus omit the details. Furthermore, the estimates of the entries
of η0 Z1 Aa (z0 , z)Z1 for a = 2, 3, 4 are similar.
Hence, we completed the proof of (B.31). Observe that for any sufficiently small δ > 0,
Ω ⊂ [d+ − δ, d+ + δ] ⊂ [d+ − δ, 1 − δ] almost surely, in light of (1.8). Hence, (B.31) together with
Lemma B.1 implies that
sup sup |(Mn )ij − δij mi (z)| ≤ n−c
z∈Ω i,j
in probability, by using the continuity of the function mi (z). Further, when δ is sufficiently small,
we also have
sup sup |mi (z) − mi (δ+ )| ≤ ε0
z∈Ω
i
in probability, by the continuity of mi (z). This concludes the proof of Lemma 7.3.
REFERENCES
[1] T. Anderson. (2003). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Third Edition. Wiley New York.
[2] Z. D. Bai, J. Hu, G.M. Pan, W. Zhou. (2015). Convergence of the empirical spectral distribution function of
Beta matrices. Bernoulli, 21(3), 1538-1574.
[3] Z. Bai, Y. Fujikoshi, and K. P. Choi. High-dimensional consistency of AIC and BIC for estimating the
number of significant components in principal component analysis. The Annals of Statistics, Accepted.
[4] Z. D. Bai, J. Yao. (2008). Central limit theorems for eigenvalues in a spiked population model. Ann. Inst.
Henri Poincar, Probab. Stat. Gauthier-Villars, 44(3), 447.
[5] J. Baik, G. Ben Arous, S. Péché. (2005). Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex
sample covariance matrices. Ann. Probab., 1643-1697.
[6] J. Baik, J. W. Silverstein. (2006). Eigenvalues of large sample covariance matrices of spiked population
models. J. Multivariate Anal., 97(6), 1382-1408.
[7] Z.G. Bao, G.M. Pan, W. Zhou. (2013). Local density of the spectrum on the edge for sample covariance matrices with general population. Preprint. Available at http://www. ntu. edu. sg/home/gmpan/publications.
html.
[8] Z.G. Bao, J. Hu, G. Pan, and W. Zhou. (2017). Test of independence for high-dimensional random vectors
based on freeness in block correlation matrices. Electron. J. Statist., 11(1):1527–1548.
[9] S. T. Belinschi, H. Bercovici, M. Capitaine, and M. Février. (2012) Outliers in the spectrum of large deformed
unitarily invariant models. Preprint.
[10] F. Benaych-Georges, A. Guionnet, M. Maida. (2011). Fluctuations of the extreme eigenvalues of finite rank
deformations of random matrices. Electron. J. Probab., 16(60), 1621-1662.
[11] F. Benaych-Georges, N. R. Rao. (2011). The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of finite, low rank perturbations
of large random matrices. Adv. Math., 227(1), 494-521.
[12] M. Capitaine, C. Donati-Martin, D. Féral. (2009). The largest eigenvalues of finite rank deformation of large
Wigner matrices: convergence and nonuniversality of the fluctuations. Ann. Probab., 1-47.
[13] M. Capitaine, C. Donati-Martin, D. Féral. (2009). Central limit theorems for eigenvalues of deformations of
Wigner matrices. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar, Probab. Stat., 48(1), 107-133.
[14] K. R. Davidson, S. J. Szarek. (2001). Local operator theory, random matrices and Banach spaces. Handbook
of the geometry of Banach spaces, 1 (317-366): 131.
[15] P. Dutilleul, B. Pelletier, and G. Alpargu. (2008). Modified tests for assessing the multiple correlation between
one spatial process and several others. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138(5):1402–1415.
52
Z.G. BAO ET AL.
[16] A. Edelman, N. R. Rao. (2005). Random matrix theory. Acta Numerica, 14, 233-297.
[17] L. Erdös, H.-T. Yau, J. Yin. (2012). Rigidity of eigenvalues of generalized Wigner matrices. Adv. Math.,
229(3): 1435-1515.
[18] D. Féral, S. Péché. (2007). The largest eigenvalue of rank one deformation of large Wigner matrices. Comm.
Math. Phys., 272(1), 185-228.
[19] D. Féral, S. Péché. (2009). The largest eigenvalues of sample covariance matrices for a spiked population:
diagonal case. J. Math. Phys., 50 (7), 073302.
[20] Y. Fujikoshi. (2016). High-Dimensional Asymptotic Distributions of Characteristic Roots in Multivariate
Linear Models and Canonical Correlation Analysis. Technical report.
[21] Y. Fujikoshi and T. Sakurai. (2016). High-dimensional consistency of rank estimation criteria in multivariate
linear model. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 149:199–212.
[22] C. Gao, Z. Ma, Z. Ren, HH Zhou. (2015). Minimax estimation in sparse canonical correlation analysis. The
Annals of Statistics. 43(5), 2168-97.
[23] C. Gao, Z. Ma, HH Zhou. (2014). Sparse CCA: Adaptive estimation and computational barriers. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1409.8565.
[24] R. Gittins. (1985). Canonical Analysis, volume 12 of Biomathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin,
Heidelberg.
[25] X. Han, G. Pan, Q. Yang. (2016). A unified matrix model including both CCA and F matrices in multivariate
analysis: the largest eigenvalue and its applications . arXiv:1606.04417.
[26] X. Han, G. Pan, and B. Zhang. (2016). The Tracy-Widom law for the largest eigenvalue of F type matrices.
Annals of Statistics, 44 (4): 1564–1592,
[27] H. Hotelling. (1936). Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 321-377.
[28] M. Hyodo, N. Shutoh, T. Nishiyama, and T. Pavlenko. (2015). Testing block-diagonal covariance structure
for high-dimensional data. Statistica Neerlandica, 69(4):460–482.
[29] D. Jiang, Z. Bai, and S. Zheng. (2013). Testing the independence of sets of large-dimensional variables.
Science China Mathematics, 56(1):135–147.
[30] T. Jiang and F. Yang. (2013). Central limit theorems for classical likelihood ratio tests for high-dimensional
normal distributions. The Annals of Statistics, 41(4):2029–2074.
[31] I. M. Johnstone. (2001). On the distribution of the largest eigenvalue in principal components analysis.
Annals of statistics, 295-327.
[32] I. M. Johnstone. (2008). Multivariate analysis and Jacobi ensembles: Largest eigenvalue, Tracy-Widom limits
and rates of convergence. Ann. Statist., 36(6): 2638.
[33] I. M. Johnstone. (2009). Approximate null distribution of the largest root in multivariate analysis. The
Annals of Applied Statistics, 3(4):1616–1633.
[34] I.M. Johnstone, A. Onatski. (2015). Testing in high-dimensional spiked models. arXiv:1509.07269.
[35] V. Kargin. (2015). Subordination for the sum of two random matrices. Ann. Probab. 43 (4): 2119-2150.
[36] B. Katz-Moses. (2012). Small Deviations for the beta-Jacobi Ensemble. PhD thesis.
[37] A. Knowles, J. Yin. (2013). The isotropic semicircle law and deformation of Wigner matrices. Comm. Pure
Appl. Math., 66(11),1663-1749.
[38] R. J. Muirhead. (1982). Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. Wiley, New York.
[39] R. Oda, H. Yanagihara and Y. Fujikoshi (2016). Asymptotic non-null distributions of test statistics for
redundancy in the high-dimensional canonical correlation analysis. Technical report.
[40] D. Passemier and J. Yao. (2012). On determining the number of spikes in a high-dimensional spiked population model. Random Matrices: Theory and Applications, 01(01):1150002.
[41] D. Paul. (2007). Asymptotics of sample eigenstructure for a large dimensional spiked covariance model.
Statist. Sinica, 17 (4), 1617-1642.
[42] S. Péché. (2006). The largest eigenvalue of small rank perturbations of Hermitian random matrices. Probab.
theory and related fields, 134(1), 127-173.
[43] A. C. Rencher and F. C. Pun. (1980). Inflation of R2 in Best Subset Regression. Technometrics, 22(1):49
[44] A.N. Tikhomirov.(1981). On the convergence rate in the central limit theorem for weakly dependent random
variables. Theory Probab. Appl., 25(4): 790-809.
[45] K. W. Wachter. (1980). The limiting empirical measure of multiple discriminant ratios. Ann. Statist., 937-957.
[46] Q. Wang and J. Yao. (2017). Extreme eigenvalues of large-dimensional spiked Fisher matrices with application. The Annals of Statistics, 45(1):415–460.
[47] Y. Yamada, M. Hyodo, and T. Nishiyama. (2017). Testing block-diagonal covariance structure for highdimensional data under non-normality. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 155(4):305–316.
[48] Y. R. Yang, G. M. Pan. (2012) The convergence of the empirical distribution of canonical correlation coefficients. Electron. J. Probab., 17, 64.
HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CCA
53
[49] Y. Yang and G. Pan. (2015). Independence test for high dimensional data based on regularized canonical
correlation coefficients. The Annals of Statistics, 43(2):467–500.
[50] S. Zheng, D. Jiang, Z. Bai, and X. He. (2014) Inference on multiple correlation coefficients with moderately
high dimensional data. Biometrika, 101(3):748–754.
Department of Mathematics,
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,
Hong Kong
E-mail: [email protected]
Division of Mathematical Sciences,
Nanyang Technological University,
Singapore 637371
E-mail: [email protected]
KLASMOE and School of Mathematics & Statistics
Northeast Normal University
P. R. China 130024
E-mail: [email protected]
Department of Statistics and Applied Probability,
National University of Singapore,
Singapore 117546
E-mail: [email protected]
URL: http://www.sta.nus.edu.sg/ stazw/
| 10math.ST
|
Distance-sensitive hashing∗
Martin Aumüller1 , Tobias Christiani1 , Rasmus Pagh1 , and
Francesco Silvestri2
1
2
IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark, {maau, tobc, pagh}@itu.dk
University of Padova, Italy, [email protected]
arXiv:1703.07867v1 [cs.DS] 22 Mar 2017
Abstract
We initiate the study of distance-sensitive hashing, a generalization of locality-sensitive hashing
that seeks a family of hash functions such that the probability of two points having the same
hash value is a given function of the distance between them. More precisely, given a distance
space (X, dist) and a “collision probability function” (CPF) f : R → [0, 1] we seek a distribution
over pairs of functions (h, g) such that for every pair of points x, y ∈ X the collision probability
is Pr[h(x) = g(y)] = f (dist(x, y)). Locality-sensitive hashing is the study of how fast a CPF
can decrease as the distance grows. For many spaces f can be made exponentially decreasing
even if we restrict attention to the symmetric case where g = h. In this paper we study how
asymmetry makes it possible to achieve CPFs that are, for example, increasing or unimodal. Our
original motivation comes from annulus queries where we are interested in searching for points
at distance approximately r from a query point, but we believe that distance-sensitive hashing
is of interest beyond this application.
1998 ACM Subject Classification H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval
Keywords and phrases locality-sensitive hashing, annulus queries, recommender systems.
Digital Object Identifier 10.4230/LIPIcs...
1
Introduction
High-dimensional nearest neighbor search in a point set P is a building block in a variety
of applications. A classical application is recommender systems: Suppose you have shown
interest in a particular item, for example a news article x. The semantic meaning of a piece
of text can be represented as a high-dimensional feature vector, for example computed using
latent semantic indexing [16]. In order to recommend other news articles we might search
the set P of article feature vectors for articles that are similar to x. But in general it is
not clear that it is desirable to recommend the most similar articles. Indeed, it might be
desirable to recommend articles that are on the same topic but are not too aligned with x,
and may provide a different perspective.
For many applications of nearest neighbor search it is acceptable to approximate distances
such that the points reported are only approximately as close to x as the true set of closest
points. Locality-sensitive hashing (LSH), first defined by Indyk and Motwani [19], is a
powerful framework for approximate nearest neighbor search (ANN) in high dimensions that
achieves sublinear query time. However, existing LSH techniques do not allow us to search
for points that are “close, but not too close”. In a nutshell: LSH provides a sequence of hash
∗
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under
the European Union’s 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement no. 614331.
Silvestri has also been supported by MIUR of Italy under project AMANDA.
© Martin Aumüller, Tobias Christiani, Rasmus Pagh, and Francesco Silvestri;
licensed under Creative Commons License CC-BY
Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics
Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl Publishing, Germany
XX:2
Distance-sensitive hashing
functions h1 , h2 , . . . such that if x and y are close we have hi (x) = hi (y) for some i with
high probability, while if x and y are distant we have that hi (x) 6= hi (y) for all i with high
probability. In this paper we seek techniques that allow us to refine the first requirement: If
x and y are “too close” we would like collisions to occur only with very small probability. At
first sight this seems impossible because we will, by definition, have a collision when x = y.
However, this objection is overcome by switching to an asymmetric setting where we work with
pairs of functions (hi , gi ) and are concerned with collisions of the form hi (x) = gi (y). More
generally, we initiate the study of the following question: In the asymmetric setting, what is
the class of functions f for which it is possible to achieve Pr[h(x) = g(y)] = f (dist(x, y)),
where the probability is over the choice of (h, g) and dist(x, y) is the distance between x and
y. We refer to such a function as a collision probability function (CPF). More formally:
I Definition 1. A distribution D over pairs of functions h, g : X → R is called distancesensitive for the space (X, dist) with collision probability function (CPF) f : R → [0, 1] if for
each pair x, y ∈ X and (h, g) sampled according to D we have Pr[h(x) = g(y)] = f (dist(x, y)).
1.1
Our results
On a high level our results go into two different directions. First, we show that distancesensitive hash families with certain CPFs allow us to reuse the standard LSH data structure
[19] to solve problems where standard LSH families do not yield satisfactory solutions. Second,
we describe constructions of distance-sensitive hash families that achieve certain CPFs and
study lower bounds on distance-sensitive hash families with monotonically increasing CPFs.
We consider a standard RAM model of computation with word size Θ(log n) bits where
n = |P | is the size of the set of points. For simplicity we also assume that a point in (X, dist)
can be stored using d words and that the time complexity is O(d) for performing distance
computations, as well as sampling and evaluating functions from a distance-sensitive family
(if this is not the case, the space and time bounds can be adjusted accordingly).
Applications. Approximate annulus search is the problem of finding a point in the set
P of data points with distance in an interval [r− , r+ ] from a query point. Having access to
a distance-sensitive hash family with a CPF that peaks inside [r− , r+ ] and is significantly
smaller at the ends of the interval gives an LSH-like solution to this problem.
I Theorem 2. Suppose we have a set P of n points, an interval [r− , r+ ], a distance r ∈
[r− , r+ ], and assume we are given a distance-sensitive family with CPF f such that f (r0 ) ≤
1/n for all r0 ∈
/ [r− , r+ ]. Then there exists a data structure that, given a query q for
which there exists x ∈ P with dist(q, x) = r, returns x0 ∈ P with dist(q, x0 ) ∈ [r− , r+ ] with
∗
probability at least 1/2. The data structure uses space O(n1+ρ /f (r) + dn) and has query
∗
time O(dnρ ), where ρ∗ = log(1/f (r))/ log n.
Obtaining a CPF that peaks inside of [r− , r+ ] can be achieved by combining a standard
locality-sensitive hash family with a distance-sensitive family that has an increasing CPF.
On the d-dimensional unit sphere under inner product similarity, our strongest construction
for solving the annulus search problem, described in section 2.2, allows us to search a point
set P of unit vectors for a vector approximately orthogonal to a query vector q in time
2
∗
dnρ +o(1) for ρ∗ = 1−α
1+α2 , where we guarantee to return a vector x with hx, qi ∈ [−α, α] if an
orthogonal vector exists (a special case of Theorem 28).
Approximate spherical range reporting [1] aims to report all points in P within distance r
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
from a query point. CPFs that have a (roughly) fixed value in [0, r] and then decrease rapidly
to zero yield data structures with good output sensitivity.
I Theorem 3. Suppose we have a set P of n points and two distances r < r+ . Assume we
are given a distance-sensitive family with CPF f where f (r0 ) ≤ 1/n for all r0 ≥ r+ , and let
fmin = inf t∈[0,r] f (t), fmax = supt∈[0,r] f (t). Then there exists a data structure that, given a
query q, returns S ⊆ {x ∈ P | dist(q, x) ≤ r+ } such that for each x ∈ P with dist(q, x) ≤ r,
∗
Pr[x ∈ S] > 1/2. The data structure uses space O(n1+ρ + dn) and the query has expected
∗
running time O(dnρ + d|S|fmax /fmin ), where ρ∗ = log(1/fmin )/ log(1/f (r+ )).
In particular, if we have a constant bound on fmax /fmin the output sensitivity is optimal
in the sense that the time to report an additional close point is O(d) which is the time it
takes to verify its distance to the query point. CPFs with this property are implicit in the
linear space extremes of the space-time tradeoff techniques for similarity search [4, 13], but a
better value of ρ∗ could possibly be obtained by allowing a higher space usage.
We note that the assumption f (r+ ) ≤ 1/n in both theorems is not critical: the standard
technique of powering (see Lemma 6) allows us to work with the CPF f (x)k for integer k,
where k is the smallest integer such that f (x)k ≤ 1/n.
The proofs of the theorems, which follow strictly along the lines of proofs for the standard
LSH data structure in [19], are sketched in Appendix A for completeness.
Constructions and lower bound. Section 2 presents our constructions of distancesensitive hash families. As a warm-up we consider a simple construction of a distance-sensitive
hash family with an increasing CPF for Hamming space building upon the well-known bitsampling approach from [19]. While bit-sampling is in a certain sense optimal [26] as a
locality-sensitive hash family with decreasing CPF w.r.t. the gap of collision probabilities at
distance r and cr, it turns out that it is possible to find distance-sensitive hash families with
CPFs that have a larger gap between the collision probabilities at distances r and r/c.
We describe two such families. The central tool in both constructions is the projection
of vectors x ∈ Rd to R by taking the inner product hx, zi where z ∼ N d (0, 1). This is a
well-known technique in the locality-sensitive hashing literature and it has been used in many
constructions of locality-sensitive families [15, 4, 13]. In our first construction, we consider an
asymmetric version of the classical E2LSH family [15] for Euclidean space, namely sampling
pairs (h, g) with
j
k
j
k
h : x 7→ ha,xi+b
,
g : x 7→ ha,xi+b
+ k,
(1)
w
w
where b ∈ [0, w] is uniformly random and a ∼ N d (0, 1) is a d-dimensional random Gaussian
vector. We show that this method, for suitable choice of parameters w ∈ R and k ∈ N, provide
a near-optimal gap of 1/c2 + o(1) in the ratio of the logarithms of collision probabilities
between close points at distance r and very close points at distance r/c. This is surprising,
since the classical E2LSH is not optimal as an LSH for Euclidean space [3].
In order to find a lower bound for the gap in the collision probabilities, we consider
vectors x, y ∈ {0, 1}d that are random and α-correlated, i.e., for each i ∈ {1, . . . , d} we have
2
Pr[xi = yi ] = 1+α
2 independently. The expected Euclidean squared distance is E[||x − y||2 ] =
(1 − α)d/2, and by applying a Chernoff bound we have that for large d the distance is within
a factor 1 + od (1) of the expectation with high probability. We show the following lower
bound:
I Theorem 4. Let D be a distribution over pairs of functions h, g : {0, 1}d → R, and define
fˆ: [−1, 1] → [0, 1] by fˆ(α) = Pr[h(x) = g(y)] where x, y are randomly α-correlated and (h, g)
1+α
is sampled according to D. Then for every 0 ≤ α < 1 we have that fˆ(α) ≥ fˆ(0) 1−α .
XX:3
XX:4
Distance-sensitive hashing
That is, the collision probability for α-correlated vectors cannot be too much smaller than
the collision probability for random (0-correlated) vectors, a statement dual to standard
(symmetric) LSH
to Euclidean
p lower bounds [22, 6, 26]. Since correlation 0 corresponds
p
distance r = d/2 and correlation α to Euclidean distance r/c = (1 − α)d/2 it follows
that the lower bound on the collision probability can also be stated in terms of Euclidean
√
distance with approximation factor c = 1/ 1 − α. Then the exponent of the bound is
2
2−1/c
1+α
2
1−α = 1/c2 = 2c − 1. This matches the exponent shown for (1) in section 2.1 up to a
constant factor, but a gap remains. Using our second construction that is based on the
recently-discovered concept of locality-sensitive filters [7] and takes ideas from [4] and [13], it
turns out that the lower bound can be matched up to a lower-order term in the exponent on
the unit sphere.
I Theorem 5. Let ε > 0 be constant. For every t > 0 there exists a family D− of distancesensitive functions for (Sd−1 , h·, ·i) with CPF f such that for α ∈ [−1 + ε, 1 − ε] we have that
ln(1/f (α)) =
1+α t2
1−α 2
+ Θ(log t)
The complexity of sampling, storing, and evaluating (h, g) ∈ D is O(dt4 et
(2)
2
/2
).
Note that this shows the exponent in Theorem 4 is tight up to an additive ot (1) term.
Finally, in section 2.3 we consider the following natural question: Let P (t) be a polynomial.
Does there exist a distance-sensitive hash family with CPF f (t) = P (t)? We present two
general approaches of constructing CPFs for the unit sphere and Hamming space that cover
a wide range of such polynomials.
1.2
Related work
A substantial literature has been devoted to the study of locality-sensitive hashing (LSH). Here
we review only selected results, and refer to [36] for a comprehensive survey. For simplicity
we consider only LSH constructions that are isometric in the sense that the probability
of a hash collision depends only on the distance dist(x, y). In other words, there exists a
collision probability function (CPF) f : R → [0, 1] such that Pr[h(x) = h(y)] = f (dist(x, y)).
Almost all LSH constructions whose collision probability has been rigorously analyzed are
isometric. Notable exceptions are recent data dependent LSH methods such as [5] where the
LSH distribution, and thus the collision probabilities, depends on the structure of data.
ρ-values. Much attention has been given to optimal ρ-values of locality-sensitive hash
functions, where we consider non-increasing CPFs. Suppose we are interested in hash
collisions when dist(x, y) = r1 but want to avoid hash collisions when dist(x, y) ≥ r2 , for
some r2 > r1 . The ρ-value of this setting is the real number in [0, 1] such that f (r1 ) = f (r2 )ρ ;
it measures the gap between collision probabilities f (r1 ) and f (r2 ). The ρ-value determines
the performance of LSH-based data structures for the (r1 , r2 )-approximate near neighbor
problem: Assume that it takes O(d) time to sample and evaluate a locality-sensitive hash
function and compute a distance between two points. Then we can preprocess a point set P of
n points in time O(d n1+ρ ) such that for a query point q from which there exists a point in P
within distance r1 , you can return x ∈ P within distance r2 of q in time O(dnρ ). In many
spaces a good upper bound on ρ can be given in terms of the ratio c = r2 /r1 , but in general
the smallest possible ρ can depend on r1 , r2 , f (r1 ), as well as the number of dimensions d.
In this paper we consider collision probabilities of the form Pr[h(x) = g(y)]; as stated
in Theorem 2 and Theorem 3 it remains relevant to compare collision probabilities using
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.05
5
10
15
20
XX:5
5
10
15
20
Figure 1 Composing several unimodal CPFs (left) to form a plateau CPF (red curve on the right)
using Lemma 6. Such a CPF is particularly interesting when applying Theorem 3.
ρ-values, but we are not limited to non-increasing CPFs so the design space is significantly
larger.
LSHable functions. Charikar [10] gave a necessary condition that all CPFs in the
symmetric setting must fulfill, namely, dist(x, y) = 1 − Pr[h(x) = h(y)] must be the distance
measure of a metric, and more specifically this metric must be isometrically embeddable
in `1 . In the asymmetric setting this condition no longer holds as can be seen, for example,
by noting that we can obtain dist(x, x) = 1 − Pr[h(x) = g(x)] > 0.
Chierichetti and Kumar [11, Lemma 7] considered transformations that can be used to
create new CPFs. Though they are considered in a symmetric setting, the same constructions
apply in an asymmetric setting and give the following result:
I Lemma 6. Let {Di }ni=1 be a collection of n distance-sensitive families with CPFs {fi }ni=1 .
Qn
(a) There exists a distance-sensitive family Dconcat with CPF f (x) = i=1 fi (x).
(b) Given a probability distribution {pi }ni=1 over {Di }, there exists a distance-sensitive family
Pn
Dp with CPF f (x) = i=1 pi fi (x).
Figure 1 shows an example application of Lemma 6. For completeness we present a proof of
Lemma 6 in Appendix B.1. Interestingly, at least in the symmetric setting, the application of
this lemma to a single CPF yields all transformations that are guaranteed to map a CPF to
a CPF. Chierichetti et al. [12] recently extended the study of CPFs in the symmetric setting
to allow approximation, i.e., allowing the collision probability to differ from a target function
by a given approximation factor.
Asymmetric locality-sensitive hashing. Motivated by applications in machine learning, Vijayanarasimhan et al. [35] presented asymmetric LSH methods for Euclidean space
where the collision probability is a decreasing function of |hx, yi|. Shrivastava and Li [31] also
explored how asymmetry can be used to achieve new CPFs (increasing), in settings where the
inner product of vectors is used to measure closeness. Neyshabur and Srebro [24] extended
this study by showing that the extra power obtained by asymmetry hinges on restrictions on
the vector pairs for which we consider collisions: If vectors are not restricted to a bounded
region of Rd , no nontrivial CPF (as a function of inner product) is possible. On the other
hand, if one vector is normalized (e.g. a query vector), the performance of known asymmetric
LSH schemes can be matched with a symmetric method. But in the case where vectors are
bounded but not normalized, asymmetric LSH is able to obtain CPFs that are impossible
for symmetric LSH. Ahle et al. [2] showed further impossibility results for asymmetric LSH
applied to inner products, and that symmetric LSH is possible in a bounded domain even
without normalization if we just allow collision probability 1 when vectors coincide.
XX:6
Distance-sensitive hashing
In section 3.2 we show that asymmetry does not help us when attempting to distinguish
between random and positively correlated points in the Hamming cube using distance-sensitive
hashing. Stated in terms of the ρ-value we get that ρ ≥ 1/(2c−1)−od (1) for distance-sensitive
hashing, matching tight lower bounds from the symmetric LSH setting [22, 6]. We note that
the asymmetric lower bound also follows implicitly from recent space-time tradeoff lower
bounds [4, 13].
Indyk [17] showed how asymmetry can be used to enable new types of embeddings.
More recently asymmetry has been used in the context of locality-sensitive filters [4, 13]
and maps [14]. The idea is to map each point x to a pair of sets (h(x), g(x)) such that
Pr[h(x) ∩ g(y) 6= ∅] is constant if x and y are close, and very small if x and y are far from
each other. This yields a similarity search data structure that adds for each vector x ∈ P
the elements of h(x) to a hash table; a query for a vector q proceeds by looking up each key
in g(q) in the hash table. One can transform such methods into asymmetric LSH methods
by using min-wise hashing [8, 9] to sample a single element from each of the sets h(x) and
g(x) (see [13, Theorem 1.4]).
Recommender systems. Returning to our motivating example we are not the first to
address the topic of getting “interesting” recommendations using similarity search methods.
Indyk et al. [18] build a similarity search data structure on a core-set of P to guarantee
diverse query results. However, this method effectively discards much of the data set, so may
not be suitable in all settings. Pagh et al. [27] consider the type of annulus queries that is
interesting for recommendation, but their solution does not use the LSH framework and is
limited to Euclidean space.
2
Constructions
Bit sampling [19] is one of the simplest LSH families for Hamming space, yet gives optimal
ρ-values in terms of the approximation factor [26]. Its CPF is f (t) = 1 − t, where t is
the relative Hamming distance. By using a function pair (x 7→ xi , x 7→ 1 − xi ) where
i ∈ {1, . . . , d} is random, we get a simple asymmetric distance-sensitive family for Hamming
space whose CPF f (t) = t, is monotonically increasing in the relative Hamming distance. We
refer to increasing CPFs as anti-LSH, and the specific family as anti bit-sampling (because
it gives a collision exactly when bit-sampling would not). Formally we have the family
Hab = {(hi , gi ) | 1 ≤ i ≤ d, hi , gi : {0, 1}d → {0, 1}, hi : x 7→ xi , gi : x 7→ 1 − xi }, which has
CPF f (t) = t.
Anti-LSH is relevant since by concatenating an anti-LSH with a standard LSH, multiplying
the CPFs (cf. Lemma 6(b)), we get unimodal CPFs that can be used to answer annulus queries.
Let us set r− = r/c and r+ = cr for some r > 0 and c > 1. Let f + and f − denote the CPFs
of the LSH and anti-LSH families. Then, by Theorem 2, the annulus problem can be solved
with ρ∗ ≤ ρ+ + ρ− , where ρ+ = log(f + (r))/ log(f + (cr)) and ρ− = log(f − (r))/ log(f − (r/c)).
For anti bit-sampling, we get that ρ− = Θ(1/ log c) as soon as r (normalized in [0, 1]) is a
constant factor from 1, and hence ρ∗ = Θ(1/ log c).
Perhaps surprisingly, this anti-LSH approach is not optimal and a better result, with
ρ∗ = O(1/c), follows by using an anti-LSH construction for Euclidean space proposed in
section 2.1 and an anti-LSH based on filters for the unit sphere proposed in section 2.2, both
yielding ρ− = O(1/c2 ).
It is natural to wonder if more advanced CPFs can be obtained. We provide some results
in this direction by describing in Section 2.3 two constructions yielding a wide class of CPFs.
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
2.1
XX:7
An Anti-LSH construction in Euclidean Space
A simple and elegant distance-sensitive hash family in Euclidean space is given by a natural
extension of the locality-sensitive hash family introduced by Datar et al. [15], where we
project a point onto a line and split this line up into buckets. Let k and w be two suitable
parameters to be chosen below. Consider the family of pairs of functions (h, g) with
ha, xi + b
ha, yi + b
h : x 7→
, g : y 7→
+ k,
w
w
indexed by a uniform real number b ∈ [0, w] and a d-dimensional random Gaussian vector
a ∼ N d (0, 1). We have the following result:
I Theorem 7. Let r− and r be two real values such that 0 < r− < r, and let c = r/r− . We
have that
log(1/f (r))
1
ρ− =
= 2 + oc,k (1).
log(1/f (r− ))
c
Proof. For the sake of simplicity we assume r = 1 in the analysis (otherwise it is enough to
scale down vectors accordingly). Let x and y be two points in Rd with distance ∆. We know
that for a ∼ N d (0, 1) the inner product ha, (x − y)i is distributed as N (0, ∆). A necessary
but not sufficient condition to have a collision between x and y is that ha, (x − y)i lies in
the interval [(k − 1)w, (k + 1)w]. Now, if t := ha, (x − y)i ∈ [(k − 1)w, kw], then the random
offset b must lie in an interval of length t − (k − 1)w, putting ha, xi and ha, yi − (k − 1)w
into different buckets. For the interval [kw, (k + 1)w] similar observations
show that b has
√
2
to be chosen in an interval of length (k + 1)w − t. Let φ(t) = 1/ 2πe−t /2 be the density
function of a standard normal random variable. Similarly to the calculations in [15], the
collision probability at distance ∆ can be calculated as follows:
ha, yi + b
ha, xi + b
f (∆) = Pr
−
=k
w
w
Z kw
Z (k+1)w
φ(t/∆) t
φ(t/∆)
t
φ(kw/∆)
=
− (k − 1) dt +
k+1−
dt −
∆
w
∆
w
∆
(k−1)w
kw
!
Z
Z kw
(k+1)w
(kw)2
t2
t2
1
t
t
− 2∆
−
−
2
=√
e
− (k − 1) dt +
e 2∆2 k + 1 −
dt − e 2∆2 .
w
w
2π∆
(k−1)w
kw
We now proceed to upper bound ρ− by finding an upper bound on f (1/c) and a lower bound
on f (1). Simple calculations give an upper bound of
2
2wc
f (1/c) ≤ √ e−(c(k−1)w) /2 .
2π
(3)
For the lower bound, we only look at the interval t ∈ [kw, (k + 1/2)w] and obtain the bound:
Z (k+1/2)w
2
2
1
t
w
− t2
f (1) ≥ √
k+1−
dt ≥ √ e−((k+1/2)w) /2 .
e
(4)
w
2π kw
4 2π
Now we multiply the ratio of the logarithms of the right-hand sides of (3) and (4) with c2
and look at the limit behavior for c → ∞. We obtain that
2
2
1
log 4√w2π e−((k+1/2)w) /2
2 log 4√w2π e− 8 (2kw+w) )
c2 = −
lim
,
2 /2
c→∞
2wc
(k − 1)2 w2
−(c(k−1)w)
log √2π e
XX:8
Distance-sensitive hashing
1.5
1.5
1.5/c^2
1.5/c^2
1.0
Limit Behavior
1.0
Limit Behavior
Rho Upper
Rho Exact
0.5
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Rho Upper
Rho Exact
0.5
4.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Figure 2 Graph depicting differences between the upper and exact bounds on the ρ− value of
the Euclidean space anti-LSH. The ρ− value is depicted on the y-axis, the approximation factor c
on the x-axis. The graph also shows the behavior of f (∆) in the limit when k and w go to ∞, and
the function 1.5/c2 . Left: Parameter setting k = 4, w = 1; right: parameter setting k = 9, w = 1.
and notice that the right-hand side goes to 1 for k → ∞ and arbitrary w > 0. This shows
the claimed result.
J
The result of Theorem 7 only holds for large k. For fixed k, ρ− behaves asymptotically as
+ oc,w (1). For example, numerical calculations for k = 9 and w = 1 give an upper
−
bound on the ρ− value of 1.5
c2 . Figure 2 compares the exact ρ value and our upper bound
for two choices of parameters.
(2k+1)2
4c2 (k−1)2
2.2
Optimal monotonic distance-sensitive hashing for the unit sphere
In this section we will show how to construct distance-sensitive hash families with monotonically increasing and decreasing CPFs for the unit sphere under inner product similarity
that match the lower bounds shown in section 3. In particular we will prove Theorem 5 by
showing the existence of a family D− with a CPF f− : [−1, 1] → [0, 1] that is monotonically
decreasing in the similarity between points sim(x, y) = hx, yi. The construction of D− follows
as a corollary from the construction of a family D+ with a CPF f+ that is monotonically
increasing in the similarity, and in fact, we have that f+ (α) = f− (−α) when D+ and D− are
parameterized in the same way. As an application of these families we show how they can be
combined to yield powerful solutions to the approximate annulus search problem for a large,
natural class of annuli. This application is further described in Appendix D.
The main new contribution compared to existing filter approaches [4, 13] is to make
use of the asymmetry granted by (h, g) ∼ D− to show the existence of a family with a
monotonically decreasing CPF. Furthermore, our analysis makes use of powerful tail bounds
for the bivariate normal distribution [30] that allows us to provide guarantees for D− , D+
that span the entire range of similarities.
The distance-sensitive families. We begin by describing the family D+ . The family
takes as parameter a real number t > 0 and an integer m that we will later set as a function
of t. We sample a pair of functions (h, g) from D+ by sampling m vectors z1 , . . . , zm where
zi ∼ N d (0, 1). The functions h, g map a point x ∈ Sd−1 to the index i of the first projection
zi where hzi , xi ≥ t. If no such projection is found, then we ensure that h(x) 6= g(x) by
mapping them to different values. Formally, we set
h+ (x) = min({i | hzi , xi ≥ t} ∪ {m + 1}),
g+ (x) = min({i | hzi , xi ≥ t} ∪ {m + 2}).
The collision probability for (h, g) ∼ D+ depends only on the similarity α = hx, yi between
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
the pair of points being evaluated and is given by
f+ (α) = Pr[h(x) = g(y)] = Pr[h(x) ≤ m ∧ g(y) ≤ m]
Pr[hz, xi ≥ t ∧ hz, yi ≥ t]
.
Pr[hz, xi ≥ t ∨ hz, yi ≥ t]
The only way the family D− differs from D+ is in the definition of g− (x) where we replace
the condition as follows:
g− (x) = min({i | hzi , xi ≤ −t} ∪ {m + 2}).
The collision probability f− (α) of D− follows analogously. We observe the following connection
between D+ and D− .
I Lemma 8. Given D+ and D− with identical parameters we have that f+ (α) = f− (−α).
with correlation α can be represented as a
Proof. A bivariate normally distributed variable
√
pair (X, Y ) with X = Z1 and Y = αZ1 + 1 − α2 Z2 where Z1 , Z2 are i.i.d. standard normal.
By the symmetry of the standard
√ normal distribution around zero it√is straightforward to
verify that Pr[Z1 ≥ t ∧ αZ1 + 1 − α2 Z2 ≥ t] = Pr[Z1 ≥ t ∧ −αZ1 + 1 − α2 Z2 ≤ −t]. J
Bounding the CPF. We use tail bounds for the standard normal distribution and the
tail bounds by Savage [30] for the bivariate standard normal distribution in order to obtain
the following lemma, the details of which are provided in Appendix C. We remark that this
lemma provides also bounds for f− (α) through the observation in Lemma 8.
I Lemma 9. For every t > 0 and α ∈ (−1, 1) the family D+ satisfies
1 t + 1 (1 + α)2
1 − α t2
¯
√
f+ (α) < f+ (α) := √
,
exp −
1+α 2
2π t2
1 − α2
(2 − α)(1 + α) 1
t ¯
f+ (α) > 1 −
f+ (α) − 2 exp(−t3 ).
2
1−α
t
t+1
The complexity of sampling, storing, and evaluating a pair of functions (h, g) ∈ D+ is
2
O(dt4 et /2 ).
Results. Combining the above ingredients show Theorem 5. We also note that a similar
statement holds for D+ :
I Corollary 10. Theorem 5 holds for D+ with the CPF bound
ln(1/f (α)) =
1 − α t2
+ Θ(log t).
1+α 2
Results on the unit sphere can be extended to `s -spaces for 0 < s ≤ 2 through the
embedding result by Rahimi and Recht [29] as shown in [13]. A more careful analysis of
the collision probabilities is required in order to combine the families D− and D+ to form
a unimodal family that can be used to solve the annulus search problem, see Theorem 2.
These results are stated in Appendix D.
2.3
General constructions
So far we have focused our attention on anti-LSH constructions, which just represent one
kind of distance-sensitive functions. We now overview general constructions targeting wider
classes of CPFs.
XX:9
XX:10
Distance-sensitive hashing
Angular similarity functions
We say that sim : [−1, 1] → [0, 1] is an LSHable angular similarity function if there exists
a distance-sensitive hash family S with collision probability function sim(hx, yi) for each
x, y ∈ Sd−1 . For example, the function sim(t) = 1 − arccos(t)/π is LSHable using the
SimHash construction of Charikar [10].
P
d
Valiant [34] described a pair of mappings ϕP
RD , where D = O(dk ), such
1 , ϕ2 : R → P
k
P
P
that ϕ1 (x) · ϕ2 (y) = P (hx, yi), for any polynomial P (t) = i=0 ai ti . By leveraging this
construction, it is possible to derive the following result (see Appendix B.2 for the proof).
I Theorem 11. Suppose that sim is an LSHable angular similarity function and that the
Pk
Pk
polynomial P (t) = i=0 ai ti satisfies i=0 |ai | = 1. Then there exists a distribution over
pairs (h, g) of functions such that for all x, y ∈ S d−1 , Pr[h(x) = g(y)] = sim(P (hx, yi)).
The computational cost of a naïve implementation of the proposed scheme may be
prohibitive when dk is large. However, by using the so-called kernel approximation methP
ods [28], we can in near-linear time compute approximations ϕ̂P
1 (x) and ϕ̂2 (y) that satisfy
P
ϕ̂P
1 (x) · ϕ̂2 (y) = P (hx, yi) ± ε with high probability for a given approximation error ε > 0.
Hamming distance functions
For Hamming space, it is natural to wonder which CFPs can be expressed as a function of
the relative Hamming distance dh (x, y). A first positive answer follows by using the anti
bit-sampling approach mentioned at the beginning of this section together with Lemma 6.
Pk
Pk
This gives a scheme for matching any polynomial P (t) = i=0 ai ti that satisfies i=0 ai = 1
and ai > 0 for each i.
In this section, we provide another construction that matches, up to a scaling factor ∆, any
polynomial P (t) having no roots with a real part in (0, 1). The scaling factor depends only
on the roots of the polynomial. We have the following result that is proven in Appendix B.3:
Pk
I Theorem 12. Let P (t) = i=0 ai ti , Z be the multiset of roots of P (t), and ψ ≤ k be the
number of roots with negative real part. Then there exists a distance-sensitive hash family
Q
with collision probability Pr(h(x) = g(y)) = P (dh (x, y)) /∆ with ∆ = ak 2ψ z∈Z,|z|>1 |zi |.
Q
The construction exploits the factorization P (t) = ak z∈Z (t − z) and consists of a
combination of |Z| variations of bit-sampling and anti bit-sampling. We refer to Theorem 12
in Appendix B.3 for the construction. Although the proposed scheme may not reach the
ρ value given by the polynomial P (t), it can be used for estimating P (dH (x, y)) since the
scaling factor is constant and only depends on the polynomial.
We remark that a scaling factor ∆ is unavoidable in the general case. Otherwise, it
would be possible to match the CFP 1 − t2 for Hamming space, which implies ρ ≤ 1/c2 in
contradiction with the lower bound 1/c in [26]. However, it is an open question to provide
better bounds on ∆.
Finally, we observe that our scheme can be used to approximate any function f (t) that
can be represented with a Taylor series: indeed, it is sufficient to truncate the series to
the term that gives the desired approximation, and then to apply our construction to the
resulting truncated polynomial.
3
Lower bound
In this section we will show lower bounds on the CPFs of distance-sensitive families in
Hamming space under relative Hamming distance. These results extend to the unit sphere
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
XX:11
and Euclidean space through standard embeddings. Our primary focus will be to obtain a
lower bound for the case of a CPF that is increasing with the distance, i.e., decreasing in the
similarity. As with our upper bounds for the unit sphere, re-applying the same techniques
also yields a lower bound for the case of an increasing CPF in the similarity.
The proof combines the (reverse) small-set expansion theorem by O’Donnell [25] with
techniques inspired by the LSH lower bound of Motwani et al. [22]. The reverse small-set
expansion theorem lower bounds the probability that random α-correlated points (x, y) end
up in a pair of subsets A, B of the Hamming cube, as a function of the size of the subsets.
The main contribution here is to extend this lower bound for pairs of subsets of Hamming
space to our object of interest: distributions over pairs of functions that partition space. We
begin by introducing the required tools from [25].
I Definition 13. For 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 we say that (x, y) are α-correlated if x is chosen uniformly
at random from {0, 1}d and y is constructed by rerandomizing each bit from x independently
at random with probability 1 − α.
In the following we refer to the volume of A ⊂ {0, 1}d as |A|/2d .
I Theorem 14 (Reverse Small-Set Expansion). Let 0 ≤ α ≤ 1. Let A, B ⊆ {0, 1}d have
volumes exp(−a2 /2), exp(−b2 /2), respectively, where a, b ≥ 0. Then we have that
1 a2 + 2αab + b2
Pr [x ∈ A, y ∈ B] ≥ exp −
.
2
1 − α2
(x,y)
α-corr.
We define a probabilistic version of the probability collision function that we will state results
for. Later we will apply concentration bounds on the similarity between α-correlated pairs
of points in order to make statements about the actual CPF. We will use R to denote the
range of a family of functions which, without loss of generality, we can assume to be finite.
I Definition 15 (Probabilistic CPF). Let D be a distribution over pairs h, g : {0, 1}d → R
and 0 ≤ α < 1. Then we define the probabilistic CPF fˆ: [0, 1] → [0, 1] by
fˆ(α) =
Pr
[h(x) = g(y)].
(h,g)∼D
(x, y) α-corr.
We are now ready to state our main lemma that lower bounds fˆ(α) in terms of fˆ(0). This
immediately implies Theorem 4.
I Lemma 16. For every distribution D over pairs of functions h, g : {0, 1}d → R and every
1+α
0 ≤ α < 1 we have that fˆ(α) ≥ fˆ(0) 1−α .
d
Proof. For a function h : {0, 1}d → R define its inverse h−1 : R → 2{0,1} by h−1 (i) = {x ∈
{0, 1}d | h(x) = i}. For a pair of functions (h, g) ∈ D and i ∈ R we define ah,i , bg,i ≥ 0
such that |h−1 (i)|/2d = exp(−a2h,i /2) and |g −1 (i)|/2d = exp(−b2g,i /2). For fixed (h, g) define
fˆh,g (α) = Pr(x, y) α-corr. [h(x) = g(y)]. We obtain a lower bound on fˆ(α) in the following
XX:12
Distance-sensitive hashing
way:
"
fˆ(α) =
#
X
E
(h,g)∼D
i∈R
Pr
[h(x) = g(y) = i]
(x, y) α-corr.
"
1 a2h,i + 2αah,i bg,i + b2g,i
≥ E
exp −
2
1 − α2
(h,g)∼D
i∈R
"
!#
X
1 a2h,i + b2g,i
≥ E
exp −
2 1−α
(h,g)∼D
X
!#
(5)
(6)
i∈R
≥
E
(h,g)∼D
1+α
fˆh,g (0) 1−α
≥
E
(h,g)∼D
1+α
1−α
ˆ
fh,g (0)
(7)
(8)
1+α
= fˆ(0) 1−α
Inequality (5) is due to Theorem 14. Inequality (6) follows from the simple fact that
a2 + α(a2 + b2 ) + b2 ≥ a2 + 2αab + b2 . Inequality (7) follows from the result of an optimization
problem further described in Appendix E.1. Finally, inequality (8) follows from a standard
application of Jensen’s Inequality.
J
3.1
Bounding the CPF
We will use Lemma 16 to a show a lower bound for distance-sensitive families that have the
opposite properties of locality-sensitive hash families. Our lower bound holds for “similarity”sensitive hash families, where we replace the distance function in the space (X, dist) in
Definition 1 by a space (X, sim) equipped with similarity measure sim : X × X → [0, 1]. The
following definition covers both standard locality-sensitive hash families and families having
the opposite behavior from a similarity perspective.
I Definition 17 (Similarity-[in]sensitive hash families). Let D be a similarity-sensitive family
for (X, sim) with CPF f . We say that D is (α− , α+ , f− , f+ )-[in]sensitive if it satisfies:
For α ≤ α− we have that f (α) ≤ f− [f (α) ≥ f− ].
For α ≥ α+ we have that f (α) ≥ f+ [f (α) ≤ f+ ].
We state our results in the natural similarity-version of Hamming space that also corresponds to embedding Hamming space into the unit sphere, namely the space ({0, 1}d , simH )
where simH (x, y) = 1 − 2 kx − yk1 /d. In the following theorem we extend the lower bound
from Lemma 16 that considers the relation between fˆ(0) and fˆ(α) to a wider range of
parameters 0 < α− < α+ < 1 and we consider the relation between f (α− ) and f (α+ ). The
proof has been deferred to Appendix E.2.
I Theorem 18. Let 0 < α− < α+ < 1 be constants. Then every (α− , α+ , f− , f+ )-insensitive
family D for ({0, 1}d , simH ) must satisfy
p
log(1/f− )
1 − α+
≥
− O( log(1/f+ )/d).
log(1/f+ )
1 + α+ − 2α−
I Remark. In the statement of Theorem 18 we may replace the properties from Definition 17
that hold for every α ≤ α− and every α ≥ α+ with less restrictive versions that hold in an
ε-interval around α− , α+ for some ε = od (1).
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
I Remark. If we rewrite the bound in terms of relative Hamming distances δ and δ/c where
δ, c are constants, we obtain a lower bound of 1/(2c − 1) − od (1) — an expression that is
familiar from known LSH lower bounds [22, 6].
3.2
The other direction
We can re-apply the techniques behind Lemma 16 and Theorem 18 to state similar results
in the other direction where for α− < α+ we are interested in upper bounding f (α+ ) as a
function of f (α− ). This is similar to the well-studied problem of constructing LSH lower
bounds and our results match known LSH bounds [22, 6], indicating that the asymmetry
afforded by D does not help us when we wish to construct similarity-sensitive families with
monotonically increasing CPFs. Implicitly, this result already follows from the space-time
tradeoff lower bounds for similarity search shown independently by Andoni et al. [4] and
Christiani [13]. As with Lemma 16, the following theorem by O’Donnell [25] is the foundation
of our lower bounds.
I Theorem 19 (Generalized Small-Set Expansion). Let 0 ≤ α ≤ 1. Let A, B ⊆ {0, 1}d have
volumes exp(−a2 /2), exp(−b2 /2) and assume 0 ≤ αb ≤ a ≤ b. Then,
1 a2 + 2αab + b2
.
Pr [x ∈ A, y ∈ B] ≥ exp −
2
1 − α2
(x,y)
α-corr.
I Lemma 20. For every distribution D over pairs of functions h, g : {0, 1}d → R and every
1−α
0 ≤ α < 1 we have that fˆ(α) ≤ fˆ(0) 1+α .
I Remark. The restriction from Theorem 19 that 0 ≤ αb ≤ a ≤ b can be ignored when
attempting to upper bound fˆ in the proof of Lemma 20 as further asymmetry does not
increase the probability of collision. The solution to the optimization problem underlying
the lower bound in Lemma 20 has a = b regardless.
We are now ready to state the corresponding result for similarity-sensitive families.
I Theorem 21. Let 0 < α− < α+ < 1 be constants. Then every (α− , α+ , f− , f+ )-sensitive
family D for ({0, 1}d , simH ) must satisfy
p
log(1/f+ )
1 − α+
≥
− O( log(1/f− )/d).
log(1/f− )
1 + α+ − 2α−
4
Conclusion
We have initiated the study of distance-sensitive hashing, an asymmetric class of LSH methods
that considerably extend the capabilities of standard LSH. We proposed some applications
and described different constructions of such hash families. Though we settled some basic
questions regarding what is possible using distance-sensitive hashing, many questions remain.
Ultimately, one would like for a given space a complete characterization of the CPFs that
can be achieved, with emphasis on extremal properties. For example: For a CPF that has
f (x) = Θ(ε) for x ∈ [0, r], how small a value ρ(c) = log(f (r))/ log(f (cr)) is possible outside
of this range? Additionally, our solution to the annulus problem works by combining an LSH
and an anti-LSH family to obtain a unimodal family. While we know lower bounds for both,
it is not clear whether combining them yields optimal solutions for this problem. Moreover,
it is also of interest to consider other applications in approximation algorithms. For example,
CPFs appear relevant for efficient kernel density estimation, see, e.g. [20].
Acknowledgement. We thank Thomas D. Ahle for insightful conversations.
XX:13
XX:14
Distance-sensitive hashing
References
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Thomas D. Ahle, Martin Aumüller, and Rasmus Pagh. Parameter-free locality sensitive
hashing for spherical range reporting. In Proceedings of 28th Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 239–256, 2017. doi:10.1137/1.9781611974782.16.
Thomas Dybdahl Ahle, Rasmus Pagh, Ilya P. Razenshteyn, and Francesco Silvestri. On
the complexity of inner product similarity join. In Proceedings of 35th ACM Symposium
on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 151–164, 2016. doi:10.1145/2902251.
2902285.
Alexandr Andoni and Piotr Indyk. Near-optimal hashing algorithms for approximate
nearest neighbor in high dimensions. In Proceedings of 47th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 459–468, 2006. doi:10.1109/FOCS.2006.49.
Alexandr Andoni, Thijs Laarhoven, Ilya P. Razenshteyn, and Erik Waingarten. Optimal
hashing-based time-space trade-offs for approximate near neighbors. In Proceedings of 28th
Annual Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 47–66, 2017. doi:10.1137/1.
9781611974782.4.
Alexandr Andoni and Ilya P. Razenshteyn. Optimal data-dependent hashing for approximate near neighbors. In Proceedings of 47th Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing
(STOC), pages 793–801, 2015. doi:10.1145/2746539.2746553.
Alexandr Andoni and Ilya P. Razenshteyn. Tight lower bounds for data-dependent localitysensitive hashing. In Proceedings of 32nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG), pages 9:1–9:11, 2016. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2016.9.
Anja Becker, Léo Ducas, Nicolas Gama, and Thijs Laarhoven. New directions in
nearest neighbor searching with applications to lattice sieving. In Proceedings of the
27th Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 10–24, 2016. doi:10.1137/1.
9781611974331.ch2.
Andrei Z Broder. On the resemblance and containment of documents. In Proceedings of
Compression and Complexity of Sequences, pages 21–29. IEEE, 1997.
Andrei Z Broder, Steven C Glassman, Mark S Manasse, and Geoffrey Zweig. Syntactic
clustering of the web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 29(8-13):1157–1166, 1997.
Moses Charikar. Similarity estimation techniques from rounding algorithms. In Proceedings
of 34th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 380–388, 2002.
Flavio Chierichetti and Ravi Kumar. Lsh-preserving functions and their applications.
Journal of the ACM (JACM), 62(5):33, 2015.
Flavio Chierichetti, Alessandro Panconesi, Ravi Kumar, and Erisa Terolli. The distortion of
locality sensitive hashing. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Innovations in Theoretical
Computer Science (ITCS), 2017.
Tobias Christiani. A framework for similarity search with space-time tradeoffs using localitysensitive filtering. In Proceedings of 28th Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages
31–46, 2017.
Tobias Christiani and Rasmus Pagh. Set similarity search beyond minhash. In Proceedings
of 49th Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), to appear, 2017.
Mayur Datar, Nicole Immorlica, Piotr Indyk, and Vahab S. Mirrokni. Locality-sensitive
hashing scheme based on p-stable distributions. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG), pages 253–262. ACM, 2004.
Scott Deerwester, Susan T Dumais, George W Furnas, Thomas K Landauer, and Richard
Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 41(6):391, 1990.
Piotr Indyk. Better algorithms for high-dimensional proximity problems via asymmetric
embeddings. In Proceedings of 14th Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages
539–545, 2003.
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
18
Piotr Indyk, Sepideh Mahabadi, Mohammad Mahdian, and Vahab S Mirrokni. Composable
core-sets for diversity and coverage maximization. In Proceedings of 33rd Symposium on
Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 100–108. ACM, 2014.
19
Piotr Indyk and Rajeev Motwani. Approximate nearest neighbors: Towards removing the
curse of dimensionality. In Proceedings of 30th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of
Computing (STOC), pages 604–613, 1998.
20
C. G. Lambert, S. E. Harrington, C. R. Harvey, and A. Glodjo. Efficient on-line nonparametric kernel density estimation. Algorithmica, 25(1):37–57, 1999. doi:10.1007/PL00009282.
21
M. Mitzenmacher and E. Upfal. Probability and computing. Cambridge University Press,
New York, NY, 2005.
22
R. Motwani, A. Naor, and R. Panigrahy. Lower bounds on locality sensitive hashing. SIAM
J. Discrete Math., 21(4):930–935, 2007.
23
Rajeev Motwani and Prabhakar Raghavan. Randomized algorithms. Chapman & Hall/CRC,
2010.
24
Behnam Neyshabur and Nathan Srebro. On symmetric and asymmetric lshs for inner
product search. In Proceedings 32nd Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages
1926–1934, 2015.
25
Ryan O’Donnell. Analysis of Boolean Functions. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
26
Ryan O’Donnell, Yi Wu, and Yuan Zhou. Optimal lower bounds for locality-sensitive
hashing (except when q is tiny). ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT),
6(1):5, 2014.
27
Rasmus Pagh, Francesco Silvestri, Johan Sivertsen, and Matthew Skala. Approximate
furthest neighbor with application to annulus query. Information Systems, 64:152–162,
2017.
28
Ninh Pham and Rasmus Pagh. Fast and scalable polynomial kernels via explicit feature
maps. In Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data
Mining (KDD), pages 239–247. ACM, 2013.
29
Ali Rahimi and Benjamin Recht.
Random features for large-scale kernel machines.
In Proceedings of 21st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 1177–1184, 2007. URL: http://papers.nips.cc/paper/
3182-random-features-for-large-scale-kernel-machines.
30
I. R. Savage. Mill’s ratio for multivariate normal distributions. Jour. Res. NBS Math. Sci.,
66(3):93–96, 1962.
31
Anshumali Shrivastava and Ping Li. Asymmetric LSH (ALSH) for sublinear time maximum inner product search (MIPS). In Proceedings of 27th Annual Conference on Neural
Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 2321–2329, 2014.
32
S. J. Szarek and E. Werner. A nonsymmetric correlation inequality for gaussian measure.
Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 68(2):193–211, 1999.
33
F. Topsœ. Some Bounds for the Logarithmic Function, volume 4, pages 137–151. Nova
Science, 2007.
34
Gregory Valiant. Finding correlations in subquadratic time, with applications to learning
parities and the closest pair problem. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 62(2):13, 2015.
35
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Prateek Jain, and Kristen Grauman. Hashing hyperplane
queries to near points with applications to large-scale active learning. IEEE Trans. Pattern
Anal. Mach. Intell., 36(2):276–288, February 2014. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2013.121.
36
J. Wang, H. T. Shen, J. Song, and J. Ji. Hashing for similarity search: A survey. CoRR,
abs/1408.2927, 2014. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.2927.
XX:15
XX:16
Distance-sensitive hashing
A
A.1
Applications
Unimodal CPFs for annulus queries
Suppose we are given a distance-sensitive hash family with CPF f (t). In this section we prove
Theorem 2 by using a simple adaptation of the standard construction of a near neighbor
data structure with LSH. We observe that this data structure improves the trivial scanning
solution when ρ∗ = log(1/f (r))/ log(1/n) < 1, that is when f (r) > f (r− ) and f (r) > f (r+ ).
This is satisfied by unimodal distance-sensitive hash families, that is when the CPF has a
single maximum at t∗ and is decreasing for both t ≤ t∗ and t ≥ t∗ : as soon as t∗ lies in the
interval (r− , r+ ) we obtain a data structure with sublinear query time.
Proof of Theorem 2. The data structure is a straight-forward adaptation of the construction
of a near neighbor data structure using LSH. Associate with each data point x and query
point y the hash values h(x) and g(y), where (h, g) are independently sampled from the
distance-sensitive family. Store all points x ∈ S according to h(x) in a hash table. Let y
be the query point and let x be a point at distance r. Compute g(y) and retrieve all the
points from S that have the same hash value. If a point within distance [r− , r+ ] is among
the points, output one such point. We expect max{f (r− )n, f (r+ )n} ≤ 1 collisions with
points at distance at most r− or at least r+ . The probability of finding x is at least f (r).
∗
Thus, L = 1/f (r) ≤ nρ repetitions suffice to retrieve x with constant probability 1/e. If
the algorithm retrieves more than 8L points, none of which is in the interval [r− , r+ ], the
algorithm terminates. By Markov’s inequality, the probability that the algorithm retrieves
8L points, none of which is in the interval [r− , r+ ], is at most 1/8.
J
A.2
Plateau CPFs for spherical range reporting
A common problem with LSH-based solutions for reporting all close points is that the CPF
is monotonically decreasing starting with collision probability very close to 1 for points that
are very close to the query point. On the other hand, many repetitions are necessary to find
points at the target distance r. This means that the algorithm retrieves many duplicates for
solving range reporting problems. The state-of-the-art data structure for range reporting
queries [1] requires O ((1 + |S ∗ |)(n/|S ∗ |)ρ ), where S ∗ is the set of points at distance at most
r+ . The following Theorem 3 provides a better analysis of the performance of a standard
LSH data structure that takes into account the gap between fmin and fmax .
Proof of Theorem 3. We assume that we build a standard LSH data structure as in the
proof of Theorem 2 above. We use 1/fmin repetitions such that each point within distance r
is found with constant probability. Each repetition will contribute O (1 + |S ∗ |fmax ) points in
expectation. Thus, the total cost will be O ((1 + |S ∗ |fmax )/fmin ) from which the statement
follows.
J
In particular, if we have a constant bound on fmax /fmin the output sensitivity is optimal.
A technique for getting a CPF with a small fmax /fmin gap is to average several unimodal
functions: given k such families, we randomly select one of them with probability 1/k. A
graphical example is given in Figure 1. For a more concrete example in Hamming space,
consider the scheme given by selecting with probability 1/2 a standard bit-sampling (f1 (t) =
1 − t), and with probability 1/2 a scheme consisting of bit-sampling and anti bit-sampling
(f2 (t) = t(1 − t)). The resulting CPF is f (t) = (1 − t2 )/2, the gap is fmax /fmin = 1/(1 − t2 ).
CPFs with constant bounds are implicit in the linear space extremes of the time-space
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
XX:17
0.8
0.60
0.7
0.55
0.6
0.5
0.50
0.4
0.45
0.3
0.40
-1.0
0.5
-0.5
1.0
-1.0
0.5
-0.5
1.0
Figure 3 Examples of collision probability functions obtained using Theorem 11. The polynomials
used are t2 , −t2 , (−t3 + t2 − t)/3 (left), and (2t2 − 1)/3, (4t3 − 3t)/7, (8t4 − 8t2 + 1)/17, (16t5 −
20t3 + 5t)/41 (right).
trade-off-aware techniques for similarity search [14], but a better value of ρ∗ could possibly
be obtained by allowing a higher space usage.
Since we use a standard LSH data structure for spherical range reporting, we get the
following adaptive variant by using Algorithm 1 from [1].
I Corollary 22. Suppose we have a set P of n points and two distances r < r+ . Assume we
have access to a distance-sensitive hash family with CPF f with fmin = inf t∈[0,r] f (t). Then
Theorem 5.1 from [1] holds for
"
#
X
−k
Wsingle = min fmin (1 +
f (dist(q, x)) .
0≤k≤K
B
x∈S
Distance-sensitive constructions
B.1
Proof of Lemma 6
Proof. Let x, y be two arbitrary points from X. Part (a): Sample a pair (hi , gi ) from Di
for each i ∈ {1, . . . , n} and set h(x) = (h1 (x), . . . , hn (x)) and g(y) = (g1 (y), . . . , gn (y)). We
observe that
Pr(h(x) = g(y)) =
n
Y
Pr(hi (x) = gi (y)) =
i=1
n
Y
fi (dist(x, y)).
i=1
Part (b): Pick an integer i ∈ {1, . . . , n} according to {pi } at random. Then sample a pair
(hi , gi ) from Di . The hash function pair (h, g) is given by (i, hi (x)) and (i, gi (y)). We observe
that
Pr(h(x) = g(y)) =
n
X
i=1
pi
Pr
(h(x) = g(y)) =
(h,g)∼Di
n
X
pi fi (dist(x, y)).
i=1
J
B.2
Angular similarity function
This section shows how to derive a distance sensitive scheme with collision probability
Pk
sim(P (hx, yi)), when i=0 |ai | = 1. Figure 3 gives some examples of functions that can be
obtained from Theorem 11 using SimHash [10].
XX:18
Distance-sensitive hashing
Proof of Theorem 11. Valiant [34] has shown how, for any real degree-k polynomial p, to
construct a pair of mappings ϕp1 , ϕp2 : Rd → RD , where D = O(dk ), such that ϕp1 (x) · ϕp2 (y) =
P (hx, yi). For completeness we outline the argument here: First consider the monomial
P (t) = ak tk . For x ∈ Rd , let x(k) denote the vector of dimension dk indexed by vectors
Qk
(k)
i = (i1 , . . . , ik ) ∈ [d]k , where xi = j=1 xij . It is easy to verify that hx(k) , y(k) i = (hx, yi)k
p
for all x, y ∈pRd . With this notation in place we can define ϕp1 (x) =
|ai | x(k) and
p
p
p
ϕ2 (y) = (ai / |ai |) y(k) which satisfy ϕ1 (x) · ϕ2 (x) = ai (hx, y, )ik . The asymmetry of the
mapping is essential to allow a negative coefficient ak . To handle an arbitrary real polynomial
Pk
P (t) = i=0 ai ti we simply concatenate vectors corresponding to each monomial, obtaining
Pk
a vector of dimension i=0 di = O(dk ).
2
Observe that ||x(k) ||22 = hx(k) , x(k) i = (hx, x, )ik = ||x||2k
2 . This means that for ||x||2 = 1
Pk p 2
Pk
p
2
we have ||ϕ1 (x)|| = i=0 |ai | = 1, using
i=0 |ai | = 1. Similarly, for
p the assumption
Pk
Pk
||y||22 = 1 we have ||ϕp2 (y)||2 = i=0 (ai / |ai |)2 = i=0 |ai | = 1. Thus, ϕp1 and ϕp2 map
S d−1 to S D−1 .
Our family F samples a function s from the distribution S corresponding to sim and
constructs the function pair (h, g) with h(x) = s(ϕp1 (x)), g(y) = s(ϕp2 (y)). Using the
properties of the functions involved we have
Pr[h(x) = g(y)] = sim(hϕp1 (x), ϕp2 (y)i) = sim(P (hx, yi)) .
J
B.3
Hamming distance functions
Proof of Theorem 12. We initially assume that a0 6= 0 (i.e., 0 is not a root of P (t)), and
then remove this assumption at the end of the proof. We recall that a root of P (t) can appear
with multiplicity larger than 1 and that, by the complex conjugate root theorem, if z = a + bi
is a complex root then so is its conjugate z 0 = a − bi. We let Z be the multiset containing
the k roots of P (t), with Zr+ and Zr− being the multiset of positive and negative real roots,
respectively, and with Zc being the multiset consisting of pairs of conjugate complex roots.
By factoring P (t), we get:
Y
Y
Y
Y
P (t) = ak
(t − z) = |ak |
(z − t)
(t + |z|)
(t2 − 2at + a2 + b2 ), (9)
z∈Z
z∈Zr+
z∈Zr−
Q
z=a+bi∈Zc
Q
where in the last step we exploited that ak z∈Zr+ (z − t) = |ak | z∈Zr+ (t − z) > 0. Indeed,
P (t) is positive in (0, 1) and the multiplicative terms associated with complex and negative
real roots are positive in this range; this implies that the remaining terms are positive as
well.
We need to introduce scaled and biased variations of bit-sampling or anti bit-sampling.
Anti-bit sampling with scaling factor α ∈ [0, 1] and bias β ∈ [0, 1] has the CPF f (t) =
β/2 + αt/2 and is given by randomly selecting one of following two schemes: (1) with
probability 1/2, the scheme is a standard hashing that maps data and query points to 0 with
probability β, and otherwise to 0 and 1 respectively; (2) with probability 1/2, the scheme
is anti bit-sampling where the sampled bit is set to 0 with probability 1 − α on both data
and query points, or kept unchanged otherwise. Similarly, bit-sampling with scaling factor
α ∈ [0, 1] has the CPF f (t) = (1 − αt) and is given by using bit-sampling, where the sampled
bit is set to 0 with probability 1 − α on both data and query points. (We do not need a
biased version of bit-sampling.)
We now assign to each multiplicative term of (9) a scaled and biased version of bit-sampling
or anti bit-sampling as follows:
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
z is real and z < −1. We assign to z an anti bit-sampling with bias 1 and scaling factor
1/|z| ≤ 1: the CPF is S1 (t, z) = (1/2 + t/(2|z|)), and we have (t + |z|) = 2|z|S1 (t, z).
z is real and −1 ≤ z < 0. We assign to z an anti bit-sampling with bias |z| ≤ 1 and
scaling factor 1: the CPF is S2 (t, z) = |z|/2 + t/2, and we have (t + |z|) = 2S2 (t, z).
z is real and z ≥ 1. We assign to z a bit-sampling with scaling factor 1/z ≤ 1: the CPF
is S3 (t, z) = (1 − t/z), and we have (t − z) = zS3 (t, z).
(z, z 0 ) are conjugate complex roots and
bi and z 0 = a − bi.
Real(z) < −1. Let z = a+
2
2
2
x
The assigned scheme has CPF S4 (t, z) = 4(a2b+b2 ) + a2a+b2 2|a|
and is obtained
+ 12
as follows: with probability b2 /(a2 + b2 ), the scheme maps data and query points to 0 and
0 with probability 1/4, or to 0 and 1 with probability 3/4; with probability a2 /(a2 + b2 ),
the schemes consists of the concatenation of two anti bit-sampling with bias 1 and scaling
factor 1/|a|. Note that t2 − 2at + a2 + b2 = 4(a2 + b2 )S4 (t, z).
(z, z 0 ) are conjugate complex roots and Real(z) ≥ 1. The scheme is similar to
the previous one where we use two bit-sampling
scaling factor 1/a
instead of
with
2
2
2
the anti bit-sampling. The CPF is S5 (t, z) = a2b+b2 + a2a+b2 1 − xa
, and we get
t2 − 2at + a2 + b2 = (a2 + b2 )S5 (t, z).
(z, z 0 ) are conjugate complex roots, −1 ≤ Real(z) ≤ 0, and |z| = a2 +b2 ≥ 1.
2
1
We assign the following scheme with CPF S6 (t, z) = 4(a2x+b2 ) + 2(a|a|x
2 +b2 ) + 4 : with
probability 1/4 the scheme maps data and query points to 0; with probability 1/2, the
scheme consists of anti bit-sampling with bias 0 and scaling factor |a|/(a2 + b2 ) ≤ 1; with
probability
1/4 the scheme consists of two anti bit-sampling with bias 0 and scaling factor
√
a2 + b2 each. We have t2 − 2at + a2 + b2 = 4(a2 + b2 )S6 (t, z).
(z, z 0 ) are conjugate complex roots, −1 ≤ Real(z) ≤ 0, and |z| = a2 + b2 < 1. We
use
the previous point with different parameters, giving CPF S7 (t, z) =
the scheme of
x2
4
2
2
a +b
+ |a|x
. The scheme is the following: with probability 1/4, the scheme is a
2 +
4
standard hashing scheme where data points are always mapped to 0 and where a query
point is mapped to 0 with probability a2 + b2 and to 1 with probability 1 − a2 + b2 ; with
probability 1/2, the scheme consists of anti bit-sampling with bias 0 and scaling factor
|a| ≤ 1; with probability 1/4, the scheme consists of two anti bit-sampling with bias 0
and scaling factor 1 each. We have t2 − 2at + a2 + b2 = 4S7 (t, z).
Consider the scheme obtained by concatenating the above ones for each real root and
Q6 Q
each pair of conjugate roots. Its CPF is S(t) = i=1 z∈Zi Si (t, z), where Zi contains root
with CPF Si . Then, by letting ψ denote the number of roots with negative real part, we get
from Equation 9:
Y
P (t) = 2ψ |ak |
|z| S(t) = ∆S(t).
z∈Z,|Real(z)|>1
Consider now ak = 0 and let ` be the largest value such that P (t) = t` P 0 (x) with
P (0) 6= 0. We get the claimed result by concatenating ` anti bit-sampling, which gives a
CPF of x` , and the scheme for P 0 (t) obtained by the procedure described above.
J
0
C
CPF bounds for the unit sphere
Gaussian tail bounds. We will make use the following tail bounds for the univariate and
bivariate normal distribution.
XX:19
XX:20
Distance-sensitive hashing
I Lemma 23 (Follows Szarek & Werner [32]). Let Z be a standard normal random variable.
Then, for every t ≥ 0 we have that
1 −t2 /2
1
1 1 −t2 /2
√
e
≤ Pr[Z ≥ t] ≤ √
e
.
2π t + 1
2π t
I Lemma 24 (Savage [30]). Let α ∈ (−1, 1) and let Z1 , Z2 ∼ N (0, 1). Define X1 = Z1 and
X2 = αZ1 + (1 − α2 )Z2 . Then, for every t > 0 we have that
1 (1 + α)2
t2
√
Pr[X1 ≥ t ∧ X2 ≥ t] <
exp −
,
2πt2 1 − α2
1+α
1 (1 + α)2
t2
(2 − α)(1 + α) 1
√
exp −
Pr[X1 ≥ t ∧ X2 ≥ t] > 1 −
.
1−α
t2 2πt2 1 − α2
1+α
I Corollary 25. The above bounds apply to Pr[X1 ≥ t∧X2 ≤ −t] if we replace all occurrences
of α with −α.
Bounding the CPF. We proceed by deriving upper and lower bounds on the collision
probability.
Pr[hz, xi ≥ t ∧ hz, yi ≥ t]
Pr[hz, xi ≥ t]
1 t + 1 (1 + α)2
1 − α t2
√
≤√
exp
−
.
1+α 2
2π t2
1 − α2
f+ (α) ≤
We derive the lower bound in stages.
Pr[h(x) = g(y)] ≥
Pr[hz, xi ≥ t ∧ hz, yi ≥ t]
− Pr[h(x) > m ∨ g(y) > m].
2 Pr[hz, xi ≥ t]
The first part is lower bounded by
Pr[hz, xi ≥ t ∧ hz, yi ≥ t]
≥
2 Pr[hz, xi ≥ t]
1 − α t2
1 1 (1 + α)2
(2 − α)(1 + α) 1
√
√
exp
−
.
1−
1−α
t2 2 2π t 1 − α2
1+α 2
The probability of not being captured by a projection depends on the number of projections
m. In order to make this probability negligible we can set m = dt3 /p0 e where p0 denotes the
lower bound from Lemma 23.
Pr[h(x) > m ∨ g(y) > m] ≤ 2(1 − Pr[hz, xi ≥ t])m
3
≤ 2(1 − p0 )t
/p0
3
≤ 2e−t .
D
Annulus search on the unit sphere
We will construct a distance sensitive family D for solving the approximate annulus search
problem. Let D+ be parameterized by t+ and let D− be parameterized by t− . To sample
a pair of functions (h, g) from D we independently sample a pair (h+ , g+ ) from D+ and
(h− , g− ) from D− and define (h, g) by h(x) = (h+ (x), h− (x)) and g(x) = (g+ (x), g− (x)).
Let f (α) denote the CPF of D. We would like to be able to parameterize D such that
f (α) is somewhat symmetric around a unique maximum value of α. It can be verified from
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
XX:21
the definition of D+ that p+ (−1) = 0 which implies that f (−1) = f (1) = 0. If we ignore
lower order terms and define γ > 0 by t− = γt+ , then we can see that
ln(1/f (α)) ≈
1 + α γ 2 t2+
1 − α t2+
+
.
1+α 2
1−α 2
For simplicity, temporarily define a(α) = (1 − α)/(1 + α) > 0. Given a fixed γ, the equation
a + γ 2 /a is minimized (corresponding to approximately maximizing f (α)) when setting
a = γ. Let αmax ∈ (−1, 1) and set γ = amax = (1 − αmax )/(1 + αmax ). To find values
α− < αmax < α+ where ln(1/f (α− )) ≈ ln(1/f (α+ )) note that this condition holds for every
s > 1 when we set a− = samax and a+ = (1/s)amax . We therefore parameterize D by
αmax ∈ (−1, 1) and t > 0 and set t+ = t and t− = (1 − αmax )/(1 + αmax )t+ . By combining
our bounds from Lemma 9 with the above observations we are able to obtain the following
theorem which immediately yields a solution to the approximate annulus search problem.
I Theorem 26. For every choice of t > 0 and constant αmax ∈ (−1, 1) the family D satisfies
the following: For every choice of constant s > 1 consider the interval [α− , α+ ] defined to
1−αmax
1−α
max
contain every α such that 1s 1−α
1+αmax ≤ 1+α ≤ s 1+αmax , then
2
max t
For α ∈ [α− , α+ ] we have that f (α) = Ω((1/t2 ) exp(−(s + 1/s) 1−α
1+αmax 2 )).
2
max t
For α ∈
/ [α− , α+ ] we have that f (α) = O((1/t2 ) exp(−(s + 1/s) 1−α
1+αmax 2 )).
The complexity of sampling, storing, and evaluating a pair of functions (h, g) ∈ D is
2
O(dt4 et /2 ).
α
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
See Figure 4 for a visual representation of the annulus for given parameters αmax and s.
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.25
-1.00 -0.75 -0.50 -0.25
-1.00
0.50
0.75
1.00
s=2
s=3
s=4
α max
Figure 4 Annuli as defined in Theorem 26 for every value of αmax and s = 2, 3, 4.
We define an approximate annulus search problem for similarity spaces and proceed by
applying Theorem 26 to provide a solution for the unit sphere, resulting in Theorem 28.
XX:22
Distance-sensitive hashing
I Definition 27. Let β− < α− ≤ α+ < β+ be given real numbers. For a set P of n points
in a similarity space (X, sim) a solution to the ((α− , α+ ), (β− , β+ ))-annulus search problem
is a data structure that supports a query operation that takes as input a point x ∈ X and if
there exists a point y ∈ P such that α− ≤ sim(x, y) ≤ α+ then it returns a point y0 ∈ P
such that β− ≤ sim(x, y0 ) ≤ β+ .
I Theorem 28. For every choice of constants −1 < β− < α− < α+ < β+ < 1 such
1−β− 1−β+
− 1−α+
that 1−α
1+α− 1+α+ = 1+β− 1+β+ we can solve the ((α+ , α− ), (β+ , β− ))-annulus problem for
(Sd−1 , h·, ·i) with space usage dn + n1+ρ+o(1) words and query time dnρ+o(1) where
ρ=
cα + 1/cα
2
≤
cβ + 1/cβ
c + 1/c
and we define 1 < cα < cβ by cα =
E
q
1−α− 1−α+
1+α− 1+α+ ,
cβ =
q
1−β− 1−β+
1+β− 1+β+ ,
and c = cβ /cα .
Details of the lower bound
E.1
Optimal partition pair problem
The lower bound in Lemma 16 relies on the following lemma which we prove by showing that
the pair of partitions induced by (h, g) ∈ D minimizes a convex function of the probability of
the parts, under the additional constraint that Pr[h(x) = g(y)] = p, when all parts are of
equal volume and as small as possible.
I Lemma 29. For every 0 ≤ α < 1, every pair of functions h, g : {0, 1}d → R must satisfy
1
1−α
X
i∈R
Pr [h(x) = g(y) = i]
(x,y)
0-corr.
1+α
1−α
≥
X
Pr [h(x) = g(y) = i]
.
(x,y)
i∈R 0-corr.
Proof. For i ∈ R define Ai = |h−1 (i)|/2d and Bi = |g −1 (i)|/2d . Given some value of
1
P
P
p = i Ai Bi we would like to choose the partition to minimize i (Ai Bi ) 1−α . In order to
avoid complications due to integrality constraints on the number of partitions, we define a
weighted version of the problem with the property that its solution never exceeds the solution
of the original problem.
minimize
X
subject to
X
wi ,Ai ,Bi
1
wi (Ai Bi ) 1−α
i
wi Ai Bi = p,
i
X
i
wi Ai = 1,
X
wi Bi = 1.
i
To ease notation and due to symmetry we will suppress different values i, i0 ∈ R in what
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
XX:23
follows. The Lagrangian for this problem and its first order partial derivatives are given by
X
X
1
wi Ai − 1)
L(wi , Ai , Bi , λA , λB , λp ) =
wi (Ai Bi ) 1−α − λA (
i
i
X
X
− λB (
wi Bi − 1) − λp (
wi Ai Bi − p),
i
∂L
∂wi
∂L
∂Ai
∂L
∂Bi
∂L
∂λA
i
1
1−α
= (Ai Bi )
− λ A Ai − λ B B i − λ p Ai B i ,
α
1
1−α
= wi
(Ai Bi )
Bi − λA − λp Bi ,
1−α
α
1
1−α
= wi
(Ai Bi )
Ai − λA − λp Ai ,
1−α
X
=
wi Ai − 1,
i
X
∂L
=
wi Bi − 1,
∂λB
i
X
∂L
wi Ai Bi − p.
=
∂λp
i
We will proceed by deriving necessary conditions for a solution by manipulating the first
order conditions that all the partial derivatives are equal to zero. Consider the following
sum:
X ∂L
X
X
1 X
wi (Ai Bi ) − λA
wi Ai − λp
wi Ai Bi .
Ai =
∂Ai
1−α i
i
i
i
Setting this equal to the corresponding sum for Bi allows us to conclude that λA = λB .
∂L
∂L
Setting ∂A
Ai = ∂B
Bi allows us to conclude that wi Ai = wi Bi . Consider now an i for
i
i
which wi 6= 0 which implies that Ai = Bi . Further assume that Ai =
6 0 since the case of
∂L
Ai = Bi = 0 will not affect the problem. Setting the first order conditions ∂w
= 0 and
i
∂L
=
0
equal
to
each
other
we
get
∂Ai
2
Ai1−α − 2λA Ai − λp A2i =
1+α
1
Ai1−α − λA − λp Ai .
1−α
This allows us to conclude that
λA = −
1+α
α
Ai1−α ,
1−α
λp =
2α
1 + α 1−α
Ai .
1−α
Because the same derivation holds for every i, for i 6= j and under the assumptions that
wi , Ai 6= 0 and wj , Aj 6= 0 it must hold that Ai = Aj . We can therefore restrict our attention
to the case of a single wi and Ai = Bi since all other solutions will result in the same value
in the optimum. From the first order conditions we have that wi Ai = 1 and wi A2i = p and it
is therefore easy to see that an optimal solution is
w1 = 1/p,
A1 = B1 = p
with everything else set to zero. In the unweighted, original formulation of the problem, this
corresponds to the partitions induced by h, g each consisting of 1/p equal parts of volume
p.
J
XX:24
Distance-sensitive hashing
E.2
Lower bounding the CPF in Hamming space
Here we prove Theorem 18 for Hamming space, using the concept of a (r, c, p, q)-insensitive
family.
I Definition 30 (Anti Locality-Sensitive Hashing). A distribution A over pairs of functions
h, g : X → R is (r, c, p, q)-insensitive for (X, dist) if for all pairs of points x, y and (h, g)
sampled randomly from A we have that:
If dist(x, y) ≥ r then Pr[h(x) = g(y)] ≥ p.
If dist(x, y) ≤ r/c then Pr[h(x) = g(y)] ≤ q.
We prove the following theorem, which can easily be converted to Theorem 18 in the main
text.
I Theorem 31. For every constant ε > 0, every (r, c, p, q)-insensitive family A for {0, 1}d
under Hamming distance with r ≤ (1 − ε)d/2 must satisfy
ρ(A) =
p
log 1/p
1
≥
− O( (c/r) log(1/q)).
log 1/q
2c − 1
ˆ
Proof. Given A we define a distribution  over pairs of functions ĥ, ĝ : {0, 1}d → R where
dˆ ≤ d remains to be determined. We sample a pair of functions (ĥ, ĝ) from  by sampling
(h, g) from H and setting ĥ(x) = h(x ◦ 1) and similarly ĝ(x) = g(x ◦ 1) where 1 denotes the
ˆ
(d − d)-dimensional
all-ones vector. We will now turn to the process of relating p to p̂ = fˆ(0)
ˆ
and q to q̂ = f (α) for Â.
Let 0 < εp < 1 and set dˆ = d2r/(1 − εp )e. Then by applying standard Chernoff bounds
we get
!
ε2p r
.
Pr
[dist(x, y) ≤ r] ≤ exp −
1 − εp 2
(x,y) 0-corr.
ε2p r
For convenience, define δp = exp − 1−ε
. We now have p̂ ≥ (1 − δp )p.
2
p
In order to tie q̂ to q we consider the probability of α-correlated points having distance
greater than r/c. The expected Hamming distance of α-correlated (x, y) in dˆ dimensions is
ˆ − α)/2. We would like to set α such that the probability of the distance exceeding r/c is
d(1
small. Let X denote dist(x, y), then the standard Chernoff bound states that:
Pr[X ≥ (1 + ε)µ] ≤ e−ε
2
µ/3
.
For a parameter 0 < εq < 1 we set α such that the following is satisfied:
(1 + εq )µ ≥ (1 + εq )
2r 1 − α
≥ r/c.
1 − εp 2
This results in a value of α = 1 −
δq ≤ exp(−ε2q µ/3) ≤ exp(−
It follows that
q̂ ≤ (1 − δq )q + δq .
1−εp 1
1+εq c
and we observe that
ε2q r
).
1 + εq 3c
M. Aumüller, T. Christiani, R. Pagh, and F. Silvestri
XX:25
Let us summarize what we know so far:
p̂ ≥ (1 − δp )p
q̂ ≤ (1 − δq )q + δq ≤ q(1 + δq /q)
0 < εp , εq < 1
ε2p r
δp ≤ exp −
1 − εp 2
!
ε2q r
δq ≤ exp −
1 + εq 3c
α=1−
!
1 − εp 1
1 + εq c
1+α
q̂ ≥ p̂ 1−α .
We assume that 0 < q < p < 1 and furthermore, without loss of generality we can assume that
q ≤ 1/e due to the powering technique. In our derivations we also assume that δp ≤ 1/2 and
δq ≤ 1/(2e) such that δq /q ≤ 1/2. This will later be implicit in the statement of the result
in big-Oh notation. From our assumptions and standard bounds on the natural logarithm
we are able to derive the following:
ln(1 − δp ) ln(1/p̂)
ln(1/p)
≥
ln(1/q)
ln(1/q)
ln(1/p̂)
≥
− 2δp
ln(1/q)
ln(1/p̂)
− 2δp
≥
ln(1 + δq /q) + ln(1/q̂)
ln(1 + δq /q)
ln(1/p̂)
1−
− 2δp
≥
ln(1/q̂)
ln(1/q̂)
ln(1/p̂)
ln(1 + δq /q)
≥
−
− 2δp
ln(1/q̂) ln(1/(1 + δq /q)q)
ln(1/p̂)
− 2δq /q − 2δp .
≥
ln(1/q̂)
(10)
In equation (10) we use the statement itself combined with our assumptions on p and q to
deduce that
1>
ln(1/p)
ln(1/p̂)
≥
.
ln(1/q)
ln(1/q̂)
We proceed by lower bounding ρ̂. Temporarily define 1 − ε0 =
ln(1/p̂)
1−α
≥
ln(1/q̂)
1+α
(1 − ε0 )/c
=
2 − (1 − ε0 )/c
1
ε0
ε0
≥
−
−
.
2c − 1 (2c − 1)2
2c − 1
We have that
ε0 = 1 −
1 − εp
1 + εq − (1 − εp )
=
≤ εq + εp ,
1 + εq
1 + εq
1−εp
1+εq
and observe that
XX:26
Distance-sensitive hashing
and combining these bounds results in
ln(1/p)
1
≥
− 2(εq + εp − δq /q − δp ).
ln(1/q)
2c − 1
p
We can now set εq = εp = K · (c/r) ln(1/q) for some universal constant K to obtain
Theorem 18.
J
E.3
Tools
For completeness we here state some standard technical lemmas used in our derivation of
the lower bound.
I Lemma 32 (Chernoff [21, Theorems 4.4 and 4.5]). Let X1 , . . . , Xn be independent Poisson
Pn
trials and define X = i=1 Xi and µ = E[X]. Then, for 0 < ε < 1 we have
2
- Pr[X ≥ (1 + ε)µ] ≤ e−ε µ/3 .
2
- Pr[X ≤ (1 − ε)µ] ≤ e−ε µ/2 .
Bounding the natural logarithm and approximating the exponential function:
I Lemma 33 ([33]). For x > −1 we have that
x
1+x
≤ ln(1 + x) ≤ x.
I Lemma 34 ([23, Prop. B.3]). For all t, n ∈ R with |t| ≤ n we have that et (1 −
(1 + nt )n ≤ et .
t2
n)
≤
| 8cs.DS
|
A Model for Donation Verification
Bin Fu1 , Fengjuan Zhu2 , and John Abraham1
arXiv:1708.07973v1 [cs.DS] 26 Aug 2017
1
Department of Computer Science
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
[email protected], [email protected]
2
Department of Law
Shaoxing University, Shaoxin, P. C. China
[email protected]
August 29, 2017
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a model for donation verification. A randomized algorithm is
developed to check if the money claimed being received by the collector is (1 − ǫ)-approximation
to the total amount money contributed by the donors. We also derive some negative results
that show it is impossible to verify the donations under some circumstances.
Keywords: Donation, Verification Model, Approximation Algorithm, Randomization
1.
Introduction
Worldwide billions of dollars are donated for charities. For example, United States alone gave over
335 billion dollars for philanthropy in 2013. When this much money is involved there would also
be fraudsters who take advantage of ones generosity. Recognizing fraudulent practices, US Federal
Trade Commission has given a number of things to check before giving to charity. The efficiency of a
charitable organization is currently determined by the percentage of fund actually end up being used
for intended purpose. CharityWatch [http://www.charitywatch.org/criteria.html] concludes 60% or
greater spent on charitable programs and the remaining spent on overhead is acceptable. However,
currently no algorithms are available to detects errors in reporting of monies donated. Donors merely
trust the data provided by the charitable organizations or charts published by organizations such as
Charity Navigator [http://www.charitynavigator.org]. Some research regarding charity donations
and their management have been conducted in the academic community [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. We have not
seen any existing research about how donors check the amount of money received by the collector.
It is essential to develop some algorithm that the donors and charitable organizations use to trust
each other.
With the development of charity donations in the modern society, it becomes a more and more
important social problem about charity donation system. In addition to establishing related laws,
it is also essential to build up efficient auditing systems about charity donations, and apply big
data technology to manage them. The progression in this direction will bring efficient and accurate
methods for charity donations, which will improve our social reliability.
In this paper we develop a method that would allow us to verify monies received by charitable
organizations. It would be difficult for every donor to verify each philanthropic organization. Our
1
a
D(a)=100
✯
✟✟
✟
✟
❍❍
❨
❍❍
b
c
D(b)=6
✟
✟✯
✟✟
d
D(d)=1
D(c)=94
❍❍
❨
❍❍
e
✟
✟✯
✟✟
f
D(e)=5
D(f)=10
❍❍
❨
❍❍
g
D(g)=84
Figure 1: Donation Tree with D(.) Values
method is based on a randomized model thereby reducing the number of verifications. Using our
algorithm, even if only a small percentage of the donors participate in the verification process,
incorrect data given by the philanthropic organizations (cheating) can be detected. With just few
steps a donor can verify if the money is used for intended purpose with a high degree of probability.
2.
Models
Assume that there are n people who donated money. Person i donates si . In this model, we assume
that each person checks his donation with probability 1 − e−λs if he donated s amount money, where
λ is fixed. This model means that a person will have larger chance to check his donation if he
contributes more money. We define a donation tree.
Definition 1. We define a donation tree. For each leaf L in a donation tree, its donation value is
defined to be D(L). For node N in a tree T , define D(N ) to be the sum of values D(.) in its leaves
of the subtree with root at N . For each node D, function V (N ) is the amount money that the
collector claims from the donors at the leaves of the subtree with root at N . An error path from a
leaf to the root has a node N with V (N ) < V (N1 ) + · · · + V (Nk ), where N1 , · · · , Nk are the children
of N in T , and V (N ) be the vale saved in node N .
A donation tree without cheating should be the case D(N ) = V (N ) for all nodes in the tree. We
have the donation tree without cheating at Figure 1.
Let k be an integer at least 2. A k-donation tree is a donation tree such that each internal node
has at most k children. The money donated from one donor is at a leaf. For every node saves N , the
total money D(N ) of leave below it, and a value V (N ) ≤ D(N ) to represents the amount of money
the collector claiming to have received from the leaves. In the case V (N ) < D(N ), it is considered
a cheating from the collector.
3.
Algorithm and Its Analysis
In this section, we develop an algorithm for this problem.
Lemma 2. For each integer k ≥ 2, A k-donation tree can be built in O(n) time offline with depth
O(log n). It also supports an O(log n) time for both insertion and deletion.
Proof:
A divide and conquer method can be used to build a donation tree of depth O(log n) with
O(n) time offline (the input of donations from n people are given). If it based on the structure of
B+-tree, then it can support O(log n) time for both insertion and deletion.
Protocol
2
a
V(a)=100
✯
✟✟
✟
✟
❍❍
❨
❍❍
b
c
V(b)=6
✟
✟✯
✟✟
d
V(d)=1
V(c)=94
❍❍
❨
❍❍
e
✟
✟✯
✟✟
f
V(e)=5
❍❍
❨
❍❍
V(f)=10
g
V(g)=84
Figure 2: Donation Tree without Cheating
Collector:
Generate a file F that a donation tree.
Publish the file F .
donor mi :
Check if his donation (D(mi ) = V (mi )).
For each node N on the path from mi to the tree root m0 , check if V (N ) = V (N1 ) + · · · +
V (Nk ), where N1 , · · · , Nk are all children of N .
Report error path if at least one of the two checks fails.
End of Protocol
Lemma 3. Assume that the root N of the donation tree T has a value V (N ) < D(N ). There
are leaves m1 , · · · , mk in the tree that all have error paths to root, and D(m1 ) + · · · + D(mk ) ≥
D(N ) − V (N ).
Proof:
We prove it by induction. It is trivial when the depth is 0. Assume that the statement
is true for the depth at most d. Consider the depth d + 1. Let N be a node of depth d + 1 and has
children N1 , · · · , Nk .
Case 1. V (N ) < V (N1 ) + · · · + V (Nk ), then every leaf has a error path.
Case 2. V (N ) ≥ V (N1 ) + · · · + V (Nk ). Let Ni1 , · · · , Nit be all of the nodes of N1 , · · · , Nk such
that V (Nis ) < D(Nis ). We have
t
X
(D(Nij ) − V (Nij )) ≥
k
X
(D(Na ) − V (Na ))
(1)
a=1
j=1
≥
D(N ) − V (N ).
(2)
We note that for each a ∈ {1, 2, · · · , k} − {i1 , · · · , it }, D(Na ) − V (Na ) ≤ 0.
By induction hypothesis, for each ij , there are leave lij ,1 , · · · , lij ,u under the subtree with root at
Let Hj = {lij ,1 , · · · , lij ,u } for j = 1, 2, · · · , t.
Nij such that D(lij ,1 )+· · ·+D(lij ,u ) ≥ D(Nij )−V (Nij ). P
Let H be the set of all leave mi ∈ H1 ∪ · · · Ht , we have mi ∈H D(mi ) ≥ D(N ) − V (N ).
3.1.
Random Verification with Exponential Distribution
In this section, we consider the case that donor join the verification by following exponential distribution. The people who donate more money have higher probability to do the verification than the
people who donate less money.
3
Theorem 4. Assume integer k ≥ 2 and there are n donors. Each verify takes O(kh steps, and
reports error if it is not an (1 − ǫ)-approximation in the report with probability at least 1 − δ, where
δ = O(e−λǫM ) and h is the depth of the tree.
Proof:
Let M = D(R) where R is the root of the donation tree. Assume that there is at least
ǫM error (D(R) − V (R) ≥ ǫD(R)).
P
Let m1 , m2 , · · · , mt be nodes with error paths to root of the tree, and have ti=1 mi ≥ ǫM by
Lemma 3.
If one of m1 , m2 , · · · , mt checks its path to the root, then an error (or cheating ) can be detected.
Therefore, this problem becomes to compute the probability that none of m1 , m2 , · · · , mt does his
verification.
The probability that none of them checks is at most e−λm1 · e−λm2 · · · e−λmt ≤ e−λǫM .
3.2.
An Implementation with B-Tree
A donation tree can be implemented with a B-tree that supports O(log n) time for searching, insertion, and deletion. When an new leave is inserted, we can update all V (N ) for node N affected in
O(log n) time. Similarly, When an new leave is deleted, we can update all V (N ) for node N affected
in O(log n) time.
3.3.
Uniform Random Verification
In this section, we consider the case that donor join the verification by following uniform distribution.
Theorem 5. Assume that each person donates the money in the range [1, a], each donor participates
in the verification with probability at least δ. Then it takes O(logk n) steps, and reports error with
eM
probability at least 1 − (1 − δ)⌈ a ⌉ .
Proof:
Assume that M is the total amount of money donated by all the people. If it is not
ǫMan
(1 − ǫ)-approximation, then there are at least ǫM
a error paths corresponding to at least k =
a
ǫM
donors. With probability at most (1 − δ)k = (1 − δ)⌈ a ⌉ , none of them will attend the verification.
eM
Therefore, with probability at least 1 − (1 − δ)⌈ a ⌉ , the error of the report will be detected.
3.4.
Multiple Verification Regions
In this section, we show the verification in several region. If each person donates amount in the range
[a0 , a]. The interval is partitioned into [a0 , a1 ), [a1 , a2 ), · · · , [ak−1 , ak ]. We assume people different
region have different probability to participate the verification.
Theorem 6. Assume that [a0 , a1 ), [a1 , a2 ), · · · , [ak−1 , ak ] form a partition for [a0 , a] with ai + 1 ≤
ai (1 + δ) for i = 0, 1, 2, · · · , k − 1. Let Ij = [aj , aj+1 ) if j < k, and Ik = [ak−1 , ak ]. Let pj be the
probability that a person with donation range in Ij verifies. Then there is a verification protocol
Pk−1
such that with probability at most j=0 (1 − pj )ǫMj /(1+δ) to fail to check 1 − ǫ approximation, where
Mj is the total amount of donation with each donation in Ij . Furthermore, the verification time is
O(log n + k).
Proof:
Use one verification tree Tj for each Ij . Form a tree T by linking T1 , · · · , Tk−1 as children.
It follows from Theorem 5.
4
a
V(a)=96
✯
✟✟
✟
✟
❍❍
❨
❍❍
b
c
V(b)=6
✟
✟✯
✟✟
d
V(d)=1
V(c)=90
❍❍
❨
❍❍
e
✟
✟✯
✟✟
f
V(e)=5
V(f)=10
❍❍
❨
❍❍
g
V(g)=84
Figure 3: Donation Tree with Cheating. Both nodes f and g can find the cheating problem at their
paths to the root. For example, at node c, V (c) < V (f ) + V (g).
4.
Impossibilities of Verification
In this section, we show that it is impossible to use uniform probability to do donation verification.
We also prove that it is impossible to do verification if negative items are allowed.
Theorem 7. There is no randomized algorithm fail to detect the cheating from collector with probability at most δ if every donor checks his donation with probability at most δ.
Proof:
Let k = 9. Imagine the collector receives M amount money with M
k from one donor A.
He releases a document that includes all the money from the others except A. If A does not verify
it, it should be all correct without any error. Therefore, with probability at most δ, the verification
fails.
Theorem 8. There is no randomized algorithm fail to detect the cheating with negative donation
allowed from collector with probability at most δ if one donor checks his donation with probability at
most δ.
Proof:
Let the sum of n − 2 donors m1 , · · · , mn−2 be equal to M . Let the donor n − 1 contributes
1 or 0, and donor n contributes −M . Consider the first case that donor n − 1 contributes 1. The
total is equal to 1.
Consider the second case that donor n − 1 contributes 0. The total is equal to 0. If that donor
n − 1 takes probability at most δ to do verification, then we have probability at most δ to make the
difference of the two cases.
5.
Conclusions
In this paper, we develop a protocol for the donation verification under some probabilistic assumption. It only expects the donors follow certain probabilistic distribution to attend verification, and
takes O(log n) steps for each donor.
References
[1] Adam Wociechowski, Models of Charity Donations and Project Funding in Social Networks,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5872, pp. 454-463, 2009.
[2] Robert Cooter, and Brian J Broughman, Charity, Publicity, and the Donation Registry, The
Economists’ Voice. Volume 2, Issue 3, pp. 1553-3832, 2005.
5
[3] Sampath Kumar Ranganathan and Walter H. Henley, Determiniants of charitable donation
intentions: a structural equation model, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary
Sector Marketing, DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.297, 2007.
[4] G. Dougla Olsen, John W. Pracejus, and Norman R. Brown, When profit equals price: consumer confusion about donation amounts in cause-related marketing. Journal of Public Policy
& Marketing: Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 170-180, 2003.
[5] Rogers Bennett, Factors influencing donation switching behaviour among charity supporters:
an empirical investigation, Journal of Customer Behaviour, Volume 8, Number 4, pp. 329-345,
2009.
6
| 8cs.DS
|
Graph Clustering using Effective Resistance
arXiv:1711.06530v1 [cs.DS] 17 Nov 2017
Vedat Levi Alev∗
Nima Anari
†
Lap Chi Lau‡
Shayan Oveis Gharan§
Abstract
We design a polynomial time algorithm that for any weighted undirected graph G = (V, E, w) and
sufficiently large δ > 1, partitions V into subsets V1 , . . . , Vh for some h ≥ 1, such that
• at most δ −1 fraction of the weights are between clusters, i.e.
w(E − ∪hi=1 E(Vi )) .
w(E)
;
δ
• the effective resistance diameter of each of the induced subgraphs G[Vi ] is at most δ 3 times the
average weighted degree, i.e.
max Reff G[Vi ] (u, v) . δ 3 ·
u,v∈Vi
|V |
w(E)
for all i = 1, . . . , h.
In particular, it is possible to remove one percent of weight of edges of any given graph such that each of
the resulting connected components has effective resistance diameter at most the inverse of the average
weighted degree.
Our proof is based on a new connection between effective resistance and low conductance sets. We
show that if the effective resistance between two vertices u and v is large, then there must be a low
conductance cut separating u from v. This implies that very mildly expanding graphs have constant effective resistance diameter. We believe that this connection could be of independent interest in algorithm
design.
1
Introduction
Graph decomposition is a useful algorithmic primitive with various applications. The general framework is
to remove few edges so that the remaining components have nice properties, and then specific problems are
solved independently in each component. Several types of graph decomposition results have been studied
in the literature. The most relevant to this work are low diameter graph decompositions and expander
decompositions. We refer the reader to Section 2 for notation and definitions.
∗ Supported
by the David R. Cheriton Graduate Scholarship. E-mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
‡ Supported by NSERC Discovery Grant 2950-120715 and NSERC Accelerator Supplement 2950-120719.
[email protected]
§ Supported by NSF Career Award and ONR Young Investigator Award, Email: [email protected]
† Email:
1
E-mail:
Low Diameter Graph Decompositions: Given a weighted undirected graph G = (V, E, w) and a
parameter ∆ > 0, a low diameter graph decomposition algorithm seeks to partition the vertex set V into
sets V1 , . . . , Vh with the following two properties:
• Each component G[Vi ] has bounded shortest path diameter, i.e. maxu,v∈Vi distw (u, v) ≤ ∆, where
distw (u, v) is the shortest path distance between u and v using the edge weight w.
Sh
• There are not too many edges between the sets Vi , i.e. E − i=1 E(Vi ) ≤ D(G)
∆ · |E|, where D(G) is
the “distortion” that depends on the input graph.
This widely studied [LS93, KPR93, Bar96, LS10, AGG+ 14] primitive (and its generalization to decomposition
into padded partitions) has been very useful in designing approximation algorithms [CCC+ 98, CKR01,
FHRT03, FHL08, KR11, BFK+ 11, LOT14]. This approach is particularly effective when the input graph is
of bounded genus g or Kr -minor free, in which case D(G) = O(log g) [LS10] and D(G) = O(r) [AGG+ 14].
For these special graphs, this primitive can be used to proving constant flow-cut gaps [KPR93], proving
tight bounds on the Laplacian spectrum [BLR10, KLPT09], and obtaining constant factor approximation
algorithms for NP-hard problems [BFK+ 11, AL17]. However, there are graphs for which D(G) is necessarily
Ω(log n) where n is the number of vertices, and this translates to a Ω(log n) factor loss in applying this
approach to general graphs. For example, in a hypercube, if we only delete a small constant fraction of
edges, some remaining components will have diameter Ω(log n).
Expander Decompositions: Given an undirected graph G = (V, E) and a parameter φ > 0, an expander
decomposition algorithm seeks to partition the vertex set V into sets V1 , . . . , Vh with the following two
properties.
• Each component G[Vi ] is a φ-expander, i.e. Φ(G[Vi ]) ≥ φ, where Φ(G[Vi ]) is the conductance of the
induced subgraph G[Vi ]; see Section 2 for the definition of conductance.
Sh
• There are not too many edges between the sets Vi , i.e. E − i=1 E(Vi ) ≤ δ(G, φ) · |E|, where δ(G, φ)
is a parameter depending on the graph G and φ.
This decomposition is also well studied [KVV04, ST11, ABS10, OT14], and is proved useful in solving
Laplacian equations, approximating Unique Games, and designing clustering algorithms. It is of natural
interest to minimize the parameter δ(G, φ). Similar to the low diameter partitioning case, there are graphs
where δ(G, φ) ≥ Ω(φ · log(n)). For example, in a hypercube, if we delete a small constant fraction of edges,
some remaining components will have conductance O(1/ log n).
Motivations: In some applications, we could not afford to have an Ω(log n) factor loss in the approximation
ratio. One motivating example is the Unique Games problem. It is known that Unique Games can be solved
effectively in graphs with constant conductance [AKK+ 08] and more generally in graphs with low threshold
rank [Kol11, GS11, BRS11], and in graphs with constant diameter [GT06]. Some algorithms for Unique
Games on general graphs are based on graph decomposition results that remove a small constant fraction
of edges so that the remaining components are of low threshold rank [ABS10] or of low diameter [AL17],
but the Ω(log n) factor loss in the decomposition is the bottleneck of these algorithms. This leads us to the
question of finding a property that is closely related to low diameter and high expansion, so that every graph
admits a decomposition into components with such a property without an Ω(log n) factor loss.
2
Effective Resistance Diameter: The property that we consider in this paper is having low effective
resistance diameter. We interpret the graph G = (V, E, w) as an electrical circuit by viewing every edge
e ∈ E as a resistor with resistance 1/w(e). The effective resistance distance Reff(u, v) between the vertices u
and v is then the potential difference between u and v when injecting a unit of electric flow into the circuit
from the vertex u and removing it out of the circuit from the vertex v. We define
Rdiam (G) := max Reff(u, v)
u,v∈V
as the effective resistance diameter of G. Both the properties of low diameter and of high expansion have
the property of low effective resistance diameter as a common denominator: The effective resistance distance
Reff(u, v) is upper bounded by the shortest path distance for any graph, and so every low diameter component
has low effective resistance diameter. Also, a d-regular graph with constant expansion has effective resistance
diameter O(1/d) [BK89, CRR+ 97], and so an expander graph also has low effective resistance diameter.
See Section 2 for more details.
In this paper, we study the connection between effective resistance and graph conductance. Roughly speaking, we show if all sets have mild expansion (see Theorem 1), then the effective resistance diameter is small.
We use this observation to design a graph partitioning algorithm to decompose a graph into clusters with
effective resistance diameter at most the inverse of the average degree (up to constant losses) while removing
only a constant fraction of edges. This shows that although we cannot partition a graph into Ω(1)-expanders
by removing a constant fraction of edges, we can partition it into components that satisfy the “electrical
properties” of expanders.
Applications of Effective Resistance: Besides the motivation from the Unique Games problem, we
believe that effective resistance is a natural property to be investigated on its own. The effective resistance
distance between two vertices u, v ∈ V has many useful probabilistic interpretations, such as the commute time [CRR+ 97], the cover time [Mat88], and the probability of an edge being in a random spanning
tree [Kir47]. See Section 2 for more details. Recently, the concept of effective resistance has found surprising applications in spectral sparsification [SS11], in computing maximum flows [CKM+ 11], in finding thin
trees [AO15], and in generating random spanning trees [KM09, MST15, DKP+ 17]. The recent algorithms in
generating a random spanning tree are closely related to our work. Madry and Kelner [KM09] showed how
e · √n) where m is the number of edges, faster than the worst
to sample a random spanning tree in time O(m
e
case cover time O(m
· n) (see Section 2). A cruicial ingredient of their algorithm is the low diameter graph
decomposition technique, which they use to ensure that the resulting components have small cover time.
In subsequent work, Madry, Straszak and Tarnawski [MST15] have improved the time complexity of their
e 4/3 ) by working with the effective resistance metric instead of the shortest path metric.
algorithm to O(m
Indeed, their technique of reducing the effective resistance diameter is similar to our technique – even though
it cannot recover our result.
1.1
Our Results
Our main technical result is the following connection between effective resistance and graph partitioning.
Theorem 1. Let G = (V, E) be a weighted graph with weights w ∈ RE
≥0 . Suppose for any set S ⊆ V with
vol(S) ≤ vol(G)/2 we have
c
Φ(S) ≥
(mild expansion)
vol(S)1/2−ε
3
for some c > 0 and 1/2 ≥ ε ≥ 0. Then, for any pair of vertices s, t ∈ V , we have
1
1
1
Reff(s, t) .
·
+
,
deg(s)2ε
deg(t)2ε
ε · c2
P
where deg(v) = u:uv∈E w(u, v) is the weighted degree of v.
(resistance bound)
In [CRR+ 97], Chandra et al. proved that a d-regular graph with constant expansion has effective resistance
diameter O(1/d). They also proved that the effective resistance diameter of a d-dimensional grid is O(1/d)
when d > 2 even though it is a poor expander. Theorem 1 can be seen as a common generalization of these
two results, using the mild expansion condition as a unifying assumption. Chandra et al. [CRR+ 97] also
√
√
showed that the effective resistance diameter of a 2-dimensional grid is Θ(log n). Note that for a n × n
grid, Φ(S) ≈ 1/ vol(S)1/2 for any k × k square. This shows that the mild expansion assumption of the
theorem cannot be weakened in the sense that if ε = 0 for some sets S, then Reff(s, t) may grow as a function
of |V |.
The proof of Theorem 1 also provides an efficient algorithm to find such a sparse cut. The high-level idea is
to prove that if all level sets of the st electric potential vector satisfy the mild expansion condition, then the
potential difference between s and t must be small, i.e., Reff(s, t) is small. Combining with a fast Laplacian
solver [ST14], we show that the existence of a pair of vertices u, v ∈ V with high effective resistance distance
implies the existence of a sparse cut which can be found in nearly linear time.
Corollary 2. Let G = (V, E, w) be a weighted undirected graph. If deg(v) ≥ 1/α for all v ∈ V , then for
any 0 < ε < 1/2, there is a subset of vertices U ⊆ V such that
αε
· vol(U )ε−1/2 .
Φ(U ) . √
Rdiam · ε
w(E)
e m · log
.
Furthermore, the set U can be found in time O
mine w(e)
Using Corollary 2 repeatedly, we can prove the following graph decomposition result.
Theorem 3 (Main). Given a weighted undirected
graph G= (V, E, w),
and a large enough parameterSδ > 1,
h
w(E)
e m · n · log
there is an algorithm with time complexity O
that finds a partition V = i=1 Vi
mine w(e)
satisfying
!
h
[
w(E)
E(Vi ) .
w E−
(loss bound)
δ
i=1
and
Rdiam (G[Vi ]) . δ 3 ·
n
w(E)
(resistance bound)
for all i = 1, . . . , h.
Let G be a d-regular unweighted graph. Theorem 3 implies that it is possible to remove a constant fraction
of the edges of G and decompose G into components with effective resistance diameter at most O(1/d). Note
that d-regular Ω(1)-expanders with Rdiam = O(1/d) have the least effective resistance diameter among all
d-regular graphs. So, even though it is impossible to decompose d-regular graphs into graphs with Ω(1)expansion while removing only a constant fraction of edges, we can find a decomposition with analogous
“electrical properties”.
4
We can also view Theorem 3 as a generalization of the following result: Any d-regular graph can be decomposed into Ω(d)-edge connected subgraphs by removing only a constant fraction of edges. This is because if
the effective resistance diameter of an unweighted graph G is ǫ, then G must be 1/ǫ-edge connected. Recall
that a graph is k-edge connected, if the size of every cut in that graph is at least k.
2
Preliminaries
In this section, we will first define the notations used in this paper, and then we will review the background
in effective resistances, Laplacian solvers, and graph expansions in the following subsections.
Given an undirected graph G = (V, E) and a subset of vertices U ⊆ V , we use the notation EG (U ) for
the set of edges with both endpoints in U , i.e. EG (U ) = {{u, v} ∈ E(G) : u, v ∈ U }. We write U c for the
complement of U with respect to V (G), i.e. U c = V \U . The variables n and m stand for the number of
vertices and the edges of the graph respectively, i.e. n = |V | and m = |E|. We use the notation ∂G U for the
edge boundary of U ⊆ V , i.e. ∂G U = EG (U, U c ) = {{u, v} ∈ E : u ∈ U, v ∈ U c }. For a graph G = (V, E)
P
with weights w ∈ RE
w(u, v) for the weighted degree of v. For S ⊆ V , the
≥0 , we write degG (v) =
u:uv∈E
P
volume volG (S) of S is defined to be volG (S) = s∈S deg(s). When the graph is clear in the context we
may drop the subscript in all aforementioned notation.
Scalar functions and vectors are typed in bold, i.e. x ∈ RV , or w ∈ RE . For a subset A ⊆ E, the notation
P
w(A) stands for the sum of the weights of all edges in A, i.e. w(A) = e∈A w(e). The j-th canonical basis
vector is denoted by ej ∈ RV . Matrices are typed in serif, i.e. A ∈ RV ×V .
e (n)) to hide polylogarithmic
Time complexities are given in asymptotic notation. We employ the notation O(f
e
factors in n, i.e. O(f (n)) = O(f (n) · polylog(n)). We use the notation f . g for asymptotic inequalities,
i.e. f = O(g); and the notation f ≍ g for asymptotic equalities, i.e. f = Θ(g).
2.1
Electric Flow, Electric Potential, and Effective Resistance
Let G = (V, E) be a given graph with non-negative edge weights w ∈ RE
≥0 . The notion of an electric flow
arises when one interprets the graph G as an electrical network where every edge e ∈ E represents a resistor
with resistance 1/w(e).
We fix an arbitrary orientation E ± of the edges E and define a unit st flow in this network as a function
±
±
f ∈ RE
we define f (e) = −f (−e)) satisfying the following:
≥0 (where for e 6∈ E
if v = s
1
X
X
f (vw) −
f (uv) = −1 if v = t
(flow conservation)
w∈δ + (v)
u∈δ − (v)
0
otherwise,
where δ + (v) is the set of edges having v as the head in our orientation, and δ − (v) is the set of edges having
v as tail. Let e = uv ∈ E ± be an oriented edge. The flow f has to obey Ohm’s law
f (e) = w(e) · ∆e p = w(e) · (p(u) − p(v))
(Ohm’s law)
for some vector p ∈ RV which we call the potential vector. The electrical flow between the vertices s and t
is the unit st flow that satisfies flow conservation and Ohm’s law.
5
The electrical energy E(f ) of a flow f is defined as the following quantity,
X f (e)2
.
w(e)
±
E(f ) =
(electrical energy)
e∈E
It is known that the electric flow between s and t is the unit st flow with minimal electrical energy. The
effective resistance Reff(s, t) between the vertices s and t is the potential difference between the vertices s
and t induced by this flow, i.e. Reff(s, t) = p(s) − p(t). It is known that the potential difference between s
and t equals the energy E(f st ) of this flow. This is often referred as Thomson’s principle.
The electric potential vector and the effective resistance are known to have the following closed form expressions: Let W ∈ RV ×V be the weighted adjacency matrix of G, i.e. the matrix satisfying W (u, v) =
1[uv ∈ E] · w(u, v), and D ∈ RV ×V the weighted degree matrix, i.e. the diagonal matrix satisfying D(v, v) =
P
deg(v) = u:uv∈E w(u, v). The (weighted) Laplacian LG ∈ RV ×V is defined to be the matrix
LG = D − W.
(weighted Laplacian)
It is well-known that this is a symmetric positive semi-definite matrix. We will take
LG =
n
X
λi v i v ⊤
i
i=2
as the spectral decomposition of LG , where λ1 = 0 ≤ λ2 ≤ · · · ≤ λn are the eigenvalues of LG sorted in
increasing order. It is easy to verify LG 1 = 0 and further it can be shown that this is the only vector (up
to scaling) satisfying this when G is connected. This means if G is connected, the matrix LG is invertible in
the subspace perpendicular to 1. This inversion will be done by the matrix L†G , the so-called Moore-Penrose
pseudo-inverse of LG defined by
L†G =
n
X
1
vi v⊤
i .
λ
j
j=2
(pseudo-inverse of LG )
Let f ⋆ ∈ RE be the st unit electric flow vector. It can be verified that the st electric potential p⋆ – i.e. the
vector satisfying w(uv) · (p⋆ (u) − p⋆ (v)) = f ⋆ (uv) for all uv ∈ E ± – satisfies the equation
LG p⋆ = es − et ⇐⇒ p⋆ = L†G (es − et ).
(2.1)
In particular, this implies the following closed form expression for Reff(s, t)
Reff(s, t) = hes − et , L†G (es − et )i.
(st effective resistance)
It can be verified that this defines a (ℓ22 ) metric on the set vertices V of G [KR93], as we have
1. Reff(u, v) = 0 if and only if u = v.
2. Reff(u, v) = Reff(v, u) for all u, v ∈ V .
3. Reff(u, v) + Reff(v, w) ≥ Reff(u, w) for all u, v, w ∈ V .
6
Further, by routing the unit st flow along the st shortest path we see that the shortest path metric dominates
the effective resistance metric, i.e. Reff(u, v) ≤ dist(u, v) for all the pairs of vertices u, v ∈ V .
It is known that the commute time distance κ(u, v) between u and v – the expected number of steps a
random walk starting from the vertex u needs to visit the vertex v and then return to u – is vol(G) times the
effective resistance distance Reff(u, v) [CRR+ 97]. Also, the effective resistance Reff(u, v) of an edge uv ∈ E
corresponds to the probability of this edge being contained in a uniformly sampled random spanning tree
[Kir47]. A well-known result of Matthews [Mat88] relates the effective resistance diameter to the cover time
of the graph – the expected number of steps a random walk needs to visit all the vertices of G. Aldous
[Ald90] and Broder [Bro89] have shown that simulating a random walk until every vertex has been visited
allows one to sample a uniformly random spanning tree of the graph.
2.2
Solving Laplacian Systems
For our algorithmic results, it will be important to be able to compute electric potentials, and effective resistances quickly. We will do this by appealing to Equation (2.1) and the definition of the st effective resistance.
Both of these equations require us to solve a Laplacian system. Fortunately, it is known that these systems
can be solved in nearly linear time [ST14, KMP10, KMP11, KOSA13, CKM+ 14, KS16].
Lemma 4 (The Spielman-Teng Solver, [ST14]). Let a (weighted) Laplacian matrix L ∈ RV ×V , a right-hand
side vector b ∈ RV , and an accuracy parameter ζ > 0 be given. Then, there is a randomized algorithm which
e
b that satisfies
takes time O(m
· log(1/ζ)) and produces a vector x
b − L† b
x
L
≤ ζ · kL† bkL
(accuracy guarantee)
with constant probability, where kxk2A = hx, Axi.
For our purposes it will suffice to pick ζ inversely polynomial in the size of the graph in the unweighted case,
and 1/ poly(w(E)/ mine w(e), 1/m) in the weighted case.
Extending the ideas of Kyng and Sachdeva [KS16], Durfee et al. [DKP+ 17] show that it is possible to compute
approximations for effective resistances between a set of given pairs S ⊆ V × V efficiently.
Lemma 5. Let G = (V, E, w) be a weighted graph, β > 0 an accuracy parameter, and S ⊆ V × V . There is
e
an O(m
+ (n + |S|)/β 2 )-time algorithm which returns numbers A(u, v) for all (u, v) ∈ V satisfying
e−β Reff(u, v) ≤ A(u, v) ≤ eβ Reff(u, v).
This lemma will aid us in computing fast approximations for furthest points in the effective resistance metric.
For our purposes, we only need to pick β as a small enough constant, i.e. β = ln(3/2). Similar guarantees
can also be obtained using the ideas of Spielman and Srivastava [SS11].
2.3
Conductance
For a graph G = (V, E) with non-negative edge weights w ∈ RE
≥0 , we define the conductance of a set S ⊆ V
as
w(∂S)
.
(conductance of a set)
Φ(S) =
vol(S)
7
The conductance of the graph G is then defined as
Φ(G) = min{Φ(S) : S ⊆ V and 2 vol(S) ≤ vol(G)}.
(conductance of a graph)
It is well-known [Che70, AM85] that the conductance of the graph G is controlled by the spectral gap (second
smallest eigenvalue) λ̃2 of the normalised Laplacian matrix D−1/2 LG D−1/2 , i.e.
q
(Cheeger’s inequality)
λ̃2 . Φ(G) . λ̃2 .
Appealing to the closed form formula for the st effective resistance it can be verified that the spectral gap
λ2 of the (unnormalised) Laplacian controls the effective resistance distance, i.e.
max Reff(s, t) .
s,t∈V
1
.
λ2
By an easy application of Cheeger’s inequality we see that the expansion controls the effective resistance as
well, i.e.
1
.
max Reff(s, t) .
s,t∈V
Φ(G)2
Indeed, Theorem 1 and Corollary 2 will improve upon this bound.
3
From Well Separated Points to Sparse Cuts
In this section, we are going to prove Theorem 1 and Corollary 2. As previously mentioned, we will prove
that if all the level sets of the potential vector have mild expansion, the effective resistance cannot be high.
Theorem 1. Let G = (V, E) be a weighted graph with weights w ∈ RE
≥0 . Suppose for any set S ⊆ V with
vol(S) ≤ vol(G)/2 we have
c
(mild expansion)
Φ(S) ≥
vol(S)1/2−ε
for some c > 0 and 1/2 ≥ ε ≥ 0. Then, for any pair of vertices s, t ∈ V , we have
1
1
1
·
Reff(s, t) .
+
,
deg(s)2ε
deg(t)2ε
ε · c2
P
where deg(v) = u:uv∈E w(u, v) is the weighted degree of v.
(resistance bound)
Proof. In the following let f ∈ RE be a unit electric flow from s to t, and p ∈ RV be the corresponding
vector of potentials where we assume without loss of generality that p(t) = 0. We direct our attention to the
following threshold sets
Sp = {v ∈ V : p(v) ≥ p}.
Then, we have
X
e∈∂Sp
|f (e)| = 1.
Using Ohm’s law, we can rewrite this into
X
e∈∂Sp
w(e) · |∆e p| = 1,
8
(3.1)
where ∆e p is the potential difference along the endpoints of the edge e. Normalizing this, we get
X
e∈∂Sp
w(e)
1
· |∆e p| =
.
w(∂Sp )
w(∂Sp )
(3.2)
Now, set µ(e) = w(e)/w(∂Sp ). Restricted over the set of edges ∂Sp , µ is a probability distribution and the
LHS of (3.2) corresponds to the expected potential drop when edges e ∈ ∂Sp are sampled with respect to
the probability distribution µ, i.e. we have
Eµ |∆e p| =
1
.
w(∂Sp )
Then, by Markov’s inequality, we get a set F ⊆ ∂Sp such that
• all edges f ∈ F satisfy
|∆f p| ≤
• Pµ (e ∈ F ) ≥ 1/2, equivalently
w(F ) =
X
w(e) =
e∈F
X
e∈F
2
;
w(∂Sp )
w(∂Sp ) · µ(e) = w(∂Sp ) · µ(F ) ≥
w(∂Sp )
.
2
Using the observation that the endpoint of an edge f ∈ F that is not contained in Sp should have potential
at least p − 2/w(∂Sp ), we obtain
vol(Sp−2/w(∂Sp ) ) ≥ vol(Sp ) + w(F ) ≥ vol(Sp ) +
w(∂Sp )
.
2
Assuming vol(∂Sp ) ≤ vol(G)/2, using the mild expansion property, we have w(∂Sp ) ≥ c vol(Sp )1/2+ε . So,
from above we get
vol(Sp−2/c vol(Sp )1/2+ε ) ≥ vol(Sp−2/w(∂Sp ) ) ≥ vol(Sp ) +
c vol(Sp )1/2+ε
,
2
where in the first inequality we also used that vol(Sp ) increases as p decreases. Now, iterating this procedure
2 vol(Sp )1/2−ε /c times we obtain
!
vol Sp−
4
c2 vol(Sp )2ε
= vol S
p−
2
c vol(Sp )1/2+ε
·
2 vol(Sp )1/2−ε
c
≥ 2 vol(Sp ),
(3.3)
as vol(Sp ) increases as p decreases. We set p0 = p(s), then vol(Sp0 ) = deg(s). Inductively define
pk+1 = pk −
4
.
c2 vol(Spk )2ε
Then, using the inequality (3.3), we have
vol(Spk+1 ) ≥ 2 · vol(Spk ).
(3.4)
Note that we can run the above procedure as long as vol(Sp ) ≤ vol(G)/2. Therefore, for some k ⋆ . log vol(G)
deg(s) ,
we must have
vol(G) ≥ 2 · vol(Spk⋆ ) ≥ vol(G)/2.
9
Therefore,
⋆
p0 − pk ⋆ ≤ 4 ·
k
X
j=0
c2
1
.
vol(Spi )2ε
Using (3.4) we get
⋆
p0 − pk ⋆
k
X
1
1
1
. 2
·
.
,
2ε
2jε
2ε
c vol(S0 )
2
deg(s) · c2 · ε
j=0
where the last inequality is a geometric sum with ratio ≈ 1/(1 + ǫ).
By a similar argument (sending flow from t to s), we see that more than half of the vertices have potential
smaller than
1
1
·
.
deg(t)2ε ε · c2
Combining these two bounds, we obtain
Reff(s, t) = p(s) .
1
1
+
2ε
deg(s)
deg(t)2ε
·
1
,
ε · c2
where the equality follows since the flow is a unit flow.
Remark 6. For our proof to go through, we do not need the mild expansion condition to be satisfied by all
cuts. It suffices to have this condition satisfied by electric potential threshold cuts (Sp , Spc ) only.
For computational purposes, it will be important to show that our argument is robust to small perturbations
in the potentials, i.e. we need to show that the proof will still go through when we are working with threshold
cuts with respect to a vector ˆp which is close to the electric potential vector p, rather than working with
the potential vector p directly. We will show this in Appendix A, Theorem 13.
3.1
Finding the Sparse Cuts Algorithmically
Next we prove Corollary 2.
Corollary 2. Let G = (V, E, w) be a weighted undirected graph. If deg(v) ≥ 1/α for all v ∈ V , then for
any 0 < ε < 1/2, there is a subset of vertices U ⊆ V such that
αε
Φ(U ) . √
· vol(U )ε−1/2 .
Rdiam · ε
w(E)
e m · log
Furthermore, the set U can be found in time O
.
mine w(e)
Proof. First, we prove the existence of U . Let u, v ∈ V such that
(3.5)
Reff(u, v) = Rdiam .
The choice of
c≍
s
1
deg(u)2ε
+
1
deg(v)2ε
Reff(u, v) · ε
ensures
Reff(u, v) >
10
1
1
+
2ε
deg(s)
deg(t)2ε
·
1
.
ε · c2
(3.6)
Then, by Theorem 1, there must be a threshold set Sp of the potential vector p corresponding to sending
one unit of electrical flow from u to v such that
Φ(U ) .
c
αε
√
· vol(U )ε−1/2 ,
.
vol(U )1/2−ε
ε · Rdiam
where the last inequality follows from our assumption that deg(v) ≥ 1/α for all v ∈ V . This proves the first
part of the corollary.
It remains to devise a near linear time algorithm to find the set U . First, suppose that we are given
the optimum pair of vertices u, v satisfying (3.5). Using the Spielman-Teng solver (Lemma 4), we can
compute
the
potential
vector p corresponding to sending one unit of electrical flow from to u to v in time
w(E)
e
e
O m · log mine w(e) . We can then sort the vertices by their potential values in time O(n log n) = O(m).
Finally, we simply go over the sorted list and find the least expanding level set. This can be done in
O(m) time in total, since getting ∂Sp(vi ) from ∂Sp(vi+1 ) (resp. vol(Sp(vi ) ) from vol(Sp(vi+1 ) )) can be done by
considering the deg(vi ) edges e ∈ ∂(vi ) incident to vi .
It remains to find such an optimal pair of vertices u, v satisfying (3.5). Instead, we find a pair of vertices
u′ , v ′ such that Reff(u′ , v ′ ) ≥ Rdiam /3, which is enough for our purposes as this only causes a constant factor
loss in the conductance of U .
e
Lemma 7. Let G be a weighted graph. In time O(m),
one can compute a pair of vertices u, v ∈ V satisfying
Reff(u, v) ≥ Rdiam /3.
Proof. By the triangle inequality for effective resistances, we have the following inequality for any u ∈ V :
Rdiam ≤ 2 max Reff(u, v).
v∈V
(3.7)
Thus, we fix a u ∈ V . Appyling Lemma 5 (with S = {u} × V ), we get the numbers A(u, v) which multiplicatively approximate Reff(u, v) within a factor eβ . Let v ∗ = arg maxv∈V A(u, v). By combining the inequality
(3.7) with
max Reff(u, v) ≤ eβ max A(u, v) = eβ A(u, v ∗ ) ≤ e2β Reff(u, v ∗ ),
v∈V
v∈V
∗
we obtain Reff(u, v ) ≥ Rdiam /3 for some β = Θ(1). The algorithm consists of an application of Lemma 5
with |S| = n, and a linear scan for finding the maximum. Hence, the time bound follows.
So, Corollary 2 follows by first using Lemma 7 to find u′ , v ′ with Reff(u′ , v ′ ) ≥ R/3, and then apply Theorem 1
with the choice of c as described in (3.6).
Remark 8. We have avoided treating the issues caused by working with an approximate potential vector for
the sake of clarity. This issue is addressed in Appendix A, Corollary 14.
4
Low Effective Resistance Diameter Graph Decomposition
In this section we prove Theorem 3.
11
Theorem 3 (Main). Given a weighted undirected
graph G= (V, E, w),
and a large enough parameterSδ > 1,
h
w(E)
e m · n · log
there is an algorithm with time complexity O
that finds a partition V = i=1 Vi
mine w(e)
satisfying
!
h
[
w(E)
E(Vi ) .
w E−
(loss bound)
δ
i=1
and
Rdiam (G[Vi ]) . δ 3 ·
n
w(E)
(resistance bound)
for all i = 1, . . . , h.
Proof. Let R be the target effective resistance diameter and W be the target sum of the weights of edges
that we are going to cut. We will write the algorithm in terms of R, W , and we will optimize for these
parameters later in the proof. Note that n = |V | is the number of vertices of the original graph G, and it is
fixed throughout the execution of the following algorithm.
Algorithm 9 (Effective Resistance Partitioning).
Intput A graph H, and parameters R, W, n.
Output A partition P = {Vi | i = 1, . . . , h} of V (H).
1. If there is a vertex v ∈ V (H) such that degH (v) ≤ W/(2n), then delete all the edges incident to v.
Repeat this step until there are no such vertices in the remaining graph H.
2. Use Lemma 7 to find vertices u, v such that Reff(u, v) ≥ Rdiam (H)/3.
3. If Reff(u, v) ≤ R, return {V (H)}.
4. Otherwise, find the cut (U, U c ) with ΦH (U ) .
minimum degree at least W/(2n) and ε = 1/4.
(n/W )ε
√
ε·R
· volH (U )ε−1/2 by invoking Corollary 2, with
5. Call the algorithm recursively on H[U ] and H[U c ].
6. Return the union of the outputs of both recursive calls.
First of all, by construction, every set Vi in the output partition satisfies Rdiam (G[Vi ]) ≤ 3R. It is not hard
e · m · log(w(E)/ mine w(e))), as the most expensive of the above algorithm
to see that the running time is O(n
e
takes time O(m
· log(w(E)/ mine w(e))), and we make at most n recursive calls.
It remains to calculate the sum of the weights of all edges that we cut. Note that we cut edges either when
a vertex has a low degree or when we find a low conductance set U . We classify the cut edges into two types
as follows:
i) Edges e where e is cut as an incident edge of a vertex v with degH (v) ≤ W/2n.
ii) The rest of the edges, i.e., edges e where e ∈ ∂H (U ) for some U where ΦH (U ) .
(n/W )ε
√
ε·R
volH (U )ε−1/2 .
We observe that we are going to remove edges of type (i) for at most n times, because each such removal
isolates a vertex of G. So, the sum of the weights of edges of type (i) that we cut is at most n · W/2n ≤ W/2.
It remains to bound the sum of the weight of edges of type (ii) that we cut.
12
We use an amortization argument: Let Ψ(e) stand for the tokens charged from an edge. We assume that for
each edge e ∈ E, the number of tokens Ψ(e) is initially set to 0. Every time we make a cut of type (ii), we
assume without loss of generality that volH (U ) ≤ vol(H)/2 and we modify the number of tokens as follows
(
w(∂H U)
Ψ(e) + w(E
if e ∈ EH (U )
H (U))
Ψ(e) :=
(4.1)
Ψ(e)
otherwise.
By definition, after the termination of the algorithm, we have
w(set of cut edges of type (ii)) =
X
e∈E
Ψ(e) · w(e).
(4.2)
Therefore, to bound the total weight of type (ii) edges that are cut, it is enough to show that no edge is
charged with too many tokens provided R is large enough.
4
R·W/8n−1
Claim 10. If R & n/(εW ), we will have Ψ(e) . √
algorithm.
for all edges e ∈ E after the termination of the
Proof. Fix an edge e ∈ E. Let ∆ Ψ(e) be the increment of Ψ(e) due to a cut (U, U c ). We have
∆ Ψ(e) =
w(∂H U )
w(∂H U )
=2·
=2·
w(EH (U ))
volH (U ) − w(∂H U )
1
1
ΦH (U)
−1
.
2c
,
volH (U )1/2−ε − c
(4.3)
where c is chosen as in (3.6) in the proof of Corollary 2 so that Φ(U ) ≤ c/ vol(U )1/2−ε for the last inequality
to hold. Since the minimum degree is at least W/2n by Step (1) of the algorithm, we have
(2n/W )ε
.
c≍ √
ε·R
The minimum degree condition also implies that volH (U ) ≥ W/(2n). Note that the denominator of the
rightmost term of (4.3) is non-negative as long as volH (U )1/2−ǫ ≥ (W/2n)1/2−ε ≥ c, which holds when
R & n/(εW ).
Let U0 ⊆ V (H0 ) be the set for which e was charged for the last time, and in general Uk ⊆ V (Hk ) be the
k-th last set for which e was charged. We write ∆k Ψ(e) to denote the increment in Ψ(e) due to Uk .
Note that by (4.1) we have e ∈ EHi (Ui ) for all i. Furthermore, since volHi (Ui ) ≤ vol(Hi )/2 ≤ volHi+1 (Ui+1 )/2
for all i, we have
(4.4)
volHk (Uk ) ≥ 2k volH0 (U0 )
for all k ≥ 0. Therefore, using (4.3) and (4.4), we can write
Ψ(e) =
X
k≥0
∆k Ψ(e) ≤
X
k≥0
X
2c
volHi (Ui )1/2−ε − c
2c
1/2−ε − c
k vol
(U
(2
0 ))
H0
k≥0
X
2c
1
≤
·
,
1/2−ε
− c k≥0 (21/2−ε )k
volH0 (U0 )
≤
13
where the last inequality assumes that ε < 1/2. As argued before, the minimum degree condition implies
that every vertex is of degree at least W/2n and thus volH0 (U0 ) ≥ W/(2n). Therefore, by the geometric sum
formula, we have
2
1
Ψ(e) ≤ 1
.
·
1/2−ε
− 1 1 − 2ε−1/2
c (W/2n)
Plugging the value of c and setting ε = 1/4 < 1/2, we conclude that
2
4
Ψ(e) . p
≤p
.
ε · R · W/2n − 1
R · W/8n − 1
Setting R ≍ δ 2 · n/W for a sufficiently large δ 2 > 1 so that the assumption of Claim 10 is satisfied, it follows
from (4.2) that the sum of the weights of all cut edges is at most
W/2 +
X
e
Ψ(e) · w(e) . W/2 +
w(E)
.
δ
Setting W = w(E)/δ proves the theorem. This completes the proof of Theorem 3.
5
Conclusions and Open Problems
We have shown that we can decompose a graph into components of bounded effective resistance diameter
while losing only a small number of edges. There are few questions which arise naturally from this work.
1. Can the decomposition in Theorem 3 be computed in near linear time? Is this decomposition useful
in generating a random spanning tree?
2. For the Unique Games Conjecture, Theorem 3 implies that we can restrict our attention to graphs with
bounded effective resistance diameter. Can we solve Unique Games instances better in such graphs?
More generally, are there some natural and nontrivial problems that can be solved effectively in graphs
of bounded effective resistance diameter?
3. Is there a generalization of Theorem 1 to multi-partitioning, i.e. does the existence of k-vertices with
high pairwise effective resistance distance help us in finding a k-partitioning of the graph where every
cut is very sparse?
4. Theorem 1 says that a small-set expander has bounded effective resistance diameter. Is it possible to
strengthen Theorem 3 to show that every graph can be decomposed into small-set expanders? This
may be used to show that the Small-Set Expansion Conjecture and the Unique Games Conjecture are
equivalent, depending on the quantitative bounds.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Hong Zhou for helpful discussions and anonymous referees for their useful suggestions.
14
References
[ABS10]
Sanjeev Arora, Boaz Barak, and David Steurer. Subexponential algorithms for unique games
and related problems. In 51th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages
563–572, 2010.
[AGG+ 14] Ittai Abraham, Cyril Gavoille, Anupam Gupta, Ofer Neiman, and Kunal Talwar. Cops, robbers, and threatening skeletons: padded decomposition for minor-free graphs. In 46th Annual
Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 79–88, 2014.
[AKK+ 08] Sanjeev Arora, Subhash Khot, Alexandra Kolla, David Steurer, Madhur Tulsiani, and
Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. Unique games on expanding constraint graphs are easy. In 40th Annual
Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 21–28, 2008.
[AL17]
Vedat Levi Alev and Lap Chi Lau. Approximating unique games using low diameter graph
decomposition. In APPROX/RANDOM 2017, pages 18:1–18:15, 2017.
[Ald90]
David Aldous. The random walk construction of uniform spanning trees and uniform labelled
trees. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 3(4):450–465, 1990.
[AM85]
Noga Alon and V. D. Milman. lambda1 , isoperimetric inequalities for graphs, and superconcentrators. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B, 38(1):73–88, 1985.
[AO15]
Nima Anari and Shayan Oveis Gharan. Effective-resistance-reducing flows, spectrally thin trees,
and asymmetric TSP. In 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages
20–39, 2015.
[Bar96]
Yair Bartal. Probabilistic approximations of metric spaces and its algorithmic applications. In
37th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 184–193, 1996.
[BFK+ 11] Nikhil Bansal, Uriel Feige, Robert Krauthgamer, Konstantin Makarychev, Viswanath Nagarajan,
Joseph Naor, and Roy Schwartz. Min-max graph partitioning and small set expansion. In 52nd
Annual Symposium on the Theory of Computation, pages 17–26. IEEE, 2011.
[BK89]
Andrei Z Broder and Anna R Karlin. Bounds on the cover time. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 2(1):101–120, 1989.
[BLR10]
Punyashloka Biswal, James R. Lee, and Satish Rao. Eigenvalue bounds, spectral partitioning,
and metrical deformations via flows. J. ACM, 57(3):13:1–13:23, 2010.
[Bro89]
Andrei Z. Broder. Generating random spanning trees. In 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations
of Computer Science, pages 442–447, 1989.
[BRS11]
Boaz Barak, Prasad Raghavendra, and David Steurer. Rounding semidefinite programming
hierarchies via global correlation. In 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer
Science, pages 472–481, 2011.
[CCC+ 98] Moses Charikar, Chandra Chekuri, To-Yat Cheung, Zuo Dai, Ashish Goel, Sudipto Guha, and
Ming Li. Approximation algorithms for directed steiner problems. In 9th Annual Symposium on
Discrete Algorithms, pages 192–200, 1998.
15
[Che70]
Jeff Cheeger. A lower bound for the smallest eigenvalue of the laplacian. Problems in analysis,
pages 195–199, 1970.
[CKM+ 11] Paul Christiano, Jonathan A. Kelner, Aleksander Madry, Daniel A. Spielman, and Shang-Hua
Teng. Electrical flows, laplacian systems, and faster approximation of maximum flow in undirected graphs. In 43rd Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 273–282, 2011.
[CKM+ 14] Michael B Cohen, Rasmus Kyng, Gary L Miller, Jakub W Pachocki, Richard Peng, Anup B
Rao, and Shen Chen Xu. Solving sdd linear systems in nearly m log 1/2 n time. In 46th Annual
Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 343–352, 2014.
[CKR01]
Gruia Călinescu, Howard J. Karloff, and Yuval Rabani. Approximation algorithms for the 0extension problem. In 12th Annual Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 8–16, 2001.
[CRR+ 97] Ashok K. Chandra, Prabhakar Raghavan, Walter L. Ruzzo, Roman Smolensky, and Prasoon
Tiwari. The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times. Computational
Complexity, 6(4):312–340, 1997.
[DKP+ 17] David Durfee, Rasmus Kyng, John Peebles, Anup B. Rao, and Sushant Sachdeva. Sampling
random spanning trees faster than matrix multiplication. In 49th Annual Symposium on Theory
of Computing, pages 730–742, 2017.
[FHL08]
Uriel Feige, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, and James R. Lee. Improved approximation algorithms
for minimum weight vertex separators. SIAM J. Comput., 38(2):629–657, 2008.
[FHRT03] Jittat Fakcharoenphol, Chris Harrelson, Satish Rao, and Kunal Talwar. An improved approximation algorithm for the 0-extension problem. In 14th Annual Symposium on Discrete Algorithms,
pages 257–265, 2003.
[GS11]
Venkatesan Guruswami and Ali Kemal Sinop. Lasserre hierarchy, higher eigenvalues, and approximation schemes for graph partitioning and quadratic integer programming with PSD objectives.
In 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 482–491, 2011.
[GT06]
Anupam Gupta and Kunal Talwar. Approximating unique games. In 17th AnnualSymposium on
Discrete Algorithms, pages 99–106, 2006.
[Kir47]
Gustav Kirchhoff. Ueber die auflösung der gleichungen, auf welche man bei der untersuchung
der linearen vertheilung galvanischer ströme geführt wird. Annalen der Physik, 148(12):497–508,
1847.
[KLPT09] Jonathan A. Kelner, James R. Lee, Gregory N. Price, and Shang-Hua Teng. Higher eigenvalues
of graphs. In 50th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 735–744,
2009.
[KM09]
Jonathan A. Kelner and Aleksander Madry. Faster generation of random spanning trees. In 50th
Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 13–21, 2009.
[KMP10]
Ioannis Koutis, Gary L. Miller, and Richard Peng. Approaching optimality for solving SDD
linear systems. In 51th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 235–244,
2010.
16
[KMP11]
Ioannis Koutis, Gary L. Miller, and Richard Peng. A nearly-m log n time solver for SDD linear
systems. In 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 590–598, 2011.
[Kol11]
Alexandra Kolla. Spectral algorithms for unique games. Computational Complexity, 20(2):177–
206, 2011.
[KOSA13] Jonathan A. Kelner, Lorenzo Orecchia, Aaron Sidford, and Zeyuan Allen Zhu. A simple, combinatorial algorithm for solving SDD systems in nearly-linear time. In 45th Annual Symposium
on Theory of Computing, pages 911–920, 2013.
[KPR93]
Philip Klein, Serge A Plotkin, and Satish Rao. Excluded minors, network decomposition, and
multicommodity flow. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of
computing, pages 682–690. ACM, 1993.
[KR93]
Douglas J Klein and Milan Randić. Resistance distance. Journal of mathematical chemistry,
12(1):81–95, 1993.
[KR11]
Robert Krauthgamer and Tim Roughgarden. Metric clustering via consistent labeling. Theory
of Computing, 7(1):49–74, 2011.
[KS16]
Rasmus Kyng and Sushant Sachdeva. Approximate gaussian elimination for laplacians - fast,
sparse, and simple. In 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages
573–582, 2016.
[KVV04]
Ravi Kannan, Santosh Vempala, and Adrian Vetta. On clusterings: Good, bad and spectral. J.
ACM, 51(3):497–515, 2004.
[LOT14]
James R. Lee, Shayan Oveis Gharan, and Luca Trevisan. Multiway spectral partitioning and
higher-order cheeger inequalities. J. ACM, 61(6):37:1–37:30, 2014.
[LS93]
Nathan Linial and Michael E. Saks. Low diameter graph decompositions. Combinatorica,
13(4):441–454, 1993.
[LS10]
James R. Lee and Anastasios Sidiropoulos. Genus and the geometry of the cut graph. In 21st
Annual Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 193–201, 2010.
[Mat88]
Peter Matthews. Covering problems for brownian motion on spheres. The Annals of Probability,
pages 189–199, 1988.
[MST15]
Aleksander Madry, Damian Straszak, and Jakub Tarnawski. Fast generation of random spanning
trees and the effective resistance metric. In 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete
Algorithms, pages 2019–2036, 2015.
[OT14]
Shayan Oveis Gharan and Luca Trevisan. Partitioning into expanders. In 25th Annual ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1256–1266, 2014.
[SS11]
Daniel A. Spielman and Nikhil Srivastava. Graph sparsification by effective resistances. SIAM
J. Comput., 40(6):1913–1926, 2011.
[ST11]
Daniel A. Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng. Spectral sparsification of graphs. SIAM J. Comput.,
40(4):981–1025, 2011.
17
[ST14]
A
Daniel A. Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng. Nearly linear time algorithms for preconditioning and
solving symmetric, diagonally dominant linear systems. SIAM J. Matrix Analysis Applications,
35(3):835–885, 2014.
Robustness of the Proof of Theorem 1
We avoided the issue of picking the accuracy parameter ǫ > 0 for the Laplacian solver we used in Corollary
2. Here, we want to show that the proof is robust enough to small perturbations in the potential vector,
i.e. using a Laplacian solver to estimate s-t potential vector p ∈ RV by the vector p̂, additively within an
accuracy of η, we can still recover our sparse cut.
We first start by noting that |p(v) − p̂(v)| ≤ η is implied by the stronger inequality,
kp̂ − pk2 ≤ η 2 .
(A.1)
We will show that if η is polynomially small in the input data, we can still find a sparse cut. Our plan is as
follows.
• We will figure out how small we should set the Laplacian solver accuracy ǫ to ensure (A.1) (Lemma
12).
• We will show that using the mild-expansion of the threshold sets Tp̂ of the vector p̂, we can still prove
upper bounds on the effective resistance (Theorem 13).
• Analogously to Corollary 2, we will show that by way of contraposition the existence of a pair with
large effective resistance distance means one of the threshold sets Tp̂ does not satisfy the mild expansion
property (Corollary 14).
A.1
Eigenvalue Bound
We start with a simple eigenvalue bound that will be used to bound the accurancy needed.
Claim 11. For any connected weighted graph G = (V, E, w), we have
2
mine w(e)
.
λ2 (G) & min w(e) ·
e
w(E)
(A.2)
Proof. For any connected weighted graph G = (V, E, w), we have the following conductance bound,
mine w(e)
|∂(S)|
: vol(S) ≤ vol(G)/2 = Φ(G) ≥
,
min
vol(S)
w(E)
which implies
mine w(e)
.
w(E)
by Cheeger’s inequality. Note that
q
λ̃2 (G)
λ2 (G) = min
u⊥1
⇐⇒
λ̃2 (G) &
mine w(e)
w(E)
2
hD−1/2 v, LD−1/2 vi
hu, Lui
= min
hu, ui
v⊥D1/2 1 hD−1/2 v, D−1/2 vi
18
(A.3)
where the last equality follows by a change of variables u = D−1/2 v. This implies that
λ2 (G) =
min
v⊥D1/2 1
hv, L̃vi
hv, L̃vi
1
≥ min
≥
· λ̃2 (G).
hv, D−1 vi v⊥D1/2 1 kD−1 k · hv, vi
kD−1 k
(A.4)
Using kD−1 k−1 = minv deg(v) ≥ mine w(e), we obtain λ2 (G) ≥ mine w(e) · λ̃2 (G). Combining everything,
we get
2
mine w(e)
(A.5)
λ2 (G) & min w(e) ·
e
w(E)
hence proving the claim.
A.2
Picking the Laplacian Solver Accuracy
For b = es − et , the Spielman Teng Solver in Lemma 4 produces a vector p̂ such that
kp̂ − L† bkL ≤ ζ · kL† bkL .
Letting p be the s-t electric potential vector, this becomes
kp̂ − pkL ≤ ζ · kpkL .
Using the definition of the L-norm, we have
hp̂ − p, L(p̂ − p)i ≤ ζ 2 hp, Lpi = ζ 2 · Reff(s, t).
Since we are working on the space orthogonal to the nullspace, both p̂, p ⊥ 1 and thus (p̂ − p) ⊥ 1. It
follows from the definition of λ2 (G) that
λ2 (G) · kp̂ − pk2 ≤ ζ 2 · Reff(s, t).
By the eigenvalue bound in (A.2), we have
kp̂ − pk2 . ζ 2 · Reff(s, t) ·
Using the trivial bound Reff(s, t) ≤
m
mine w(e)
w(E)2
.
(mine w(e))3
in a connected graph, we get
kp̂ − pk2 . ζ 2 · m ·
Therefore, we can set
ζ≍
w(E)2
.
(mine w(e))4
η · (mine w(e))2
√
w(E) · m
to get the desired accuracy in (A.1). The above argument is summarized in the following lemma.
Lemma 12. Given a connected weighted graph G = (V, E, w), it is possible to compute an estimate p̂ of the
s-t electric potential vector p within an additive accuracy of η using the Spielman-Teng solver with accuracy
ζ≍
η · (mine w(e))2
√
.
w(E) · m
19
A.3
How Small Should We Pick η?
In the proof of Theorem 1, we used the actual potential vector to bound the effective resistance. This is too
expensive for algorithmic purposes. We now show that we can use the estimate p̂ and the potential sets
Tp̂ = {v ∈ V : p̂(v) ≥ p̂}
at a small cost. We will show that the mild-expansion of these cuts allows us to bound the effective resistance
from above, just as in Theorem 1.
Theorem 13. Let p̂ be an additive η-approximation of the electric potential vector p between s and t, i.e.
|p̂(u) − p(u)| ≤ η
∀u ∈ V.
If all the threshold cuts Tp̂ satisfy the mild expansion condition,
w(∂Tp̂ ) ≥ c · vol(Tp̂ )1/2+ε
Then, we have
Reff(s, t) .
1
η(48m1/2−ε log n + 2c)
1
+
+
.
εc2 deg(s)2ε
εc2 deg(t)2ε
c
Proof. The proof will be very similar to that of Theorem 1, we will just highlight the differences and carry
out the relevant computations.
To follow the proof of Theorem 1, we need an upper bound on the quantity
X
X
X
w(e) · |∆e p| + 2η · w(∂Tp̂ ).
w(e) · (|∆e p| + 2η) =
w(e) · |∆e p̂| ≤
e∈∂Tp̂
(A.6)
e∈∂Tp̂
e∈∂Tp̂
where for the first inequality we have used the triangle inequality
|∆e p̂| = |p̂(e+ ) − p̂(e− )| ≤ |p(e+ ) − p(e− )| + |p(e+ ) − p̂(e+ )| + |p(e− ) − p̂(e− )| ≤ |∆e p| + 2η.
Bounding the RHS of (A.6) is certainly possible by bounding
X
w(e) · |∆e p̂|.
(A.7)
e∈∂Tp̂
In Theorem 1, we used the Equation (3.1) to bound the analogous term, i.e.
X
X
w(e) · |∆e p| = 1.
|f (e)| =
e∈∂Sp
e∈∂Sp
We were allowed to do this because Sp is a threshold set, i.e. the st electric flow flows in one direction: from
P
Sp to Spc . This means that flow conservation insures e∈∂(Sp ) |f (e)| = 1, as s has a flow deficit of a unit,
and t has a flow surplus of a unit. This is no longer true for Tp̂ since Tp̂ is no longer a threshold set of the
P
true potential vector p, i.e. we do not necessarily have e∈∂(Tp̂ ) |f (e)| = 1.
Before we go on further, we adopt the following convention of taking uv ∈ ∂Tp̂ to be an edge with u ∈ Tp̂
and v 6∈ Tp̂ .
20
In our case the conservation of flow still implies,
X
(A.8)
f (e) = 1.
e∈∂Tp̂
We will take P − to be the set of edges uv ∈ ∂(Tp̂ ) with p(u) < p(v), and P + to be the set of edges uv ∈ ∂(Tp̂ )
with p(u) ≥ p(v).
Now, note that (A.8) rewrites into,
X
uv∈P +
w(uv) · |∆uv p| −
X
uv∈P −
w(uv) · |∆uv p| = 1.
In particular, we can manipulate this to obtain
X
X
X
X
w(uv)·|∆uv p| =
w(u, v)·|∆uv p|+
w(u, v)·|∆uv p| = 1 + 2
w(u, v)·|∆uv p|. (A.9)
uv∈P −
uv∈∂Tp̂
uv∈P −
uv∈P −
We see now, proving an upper bound on (A.6) boils down to upper bounding |∆uv p| for uv ∈ P − . This can
be done by noting p̂(u) > p̂(v) (as uv ∈ ∂(Tp̂ )) and p ≈ p̂. Formally, we have
p(u) + η ≥ p̂(u) ≥ p̂ > p̂(v) ≥ p(v) − η,
which means, we must either have p(u) ≥ p(v) or it must be the case that we have p(u) < p(v) and
|∆uv p| ≤ 2η. This readily implies the following inequality,
X
w(e) · |∆e p| ≤ 2η · w(∂Tp ).
(A.10)
e∈P −
Plugging this in (A.9), we get
X
X
X
w(e) · |∆e p| =
w(e) · |∆e p| +
w(e) · |∆e p| ≤ 1 + 4η · w(∂Tp̂ ).
e∈∂Tp̂
e∈P −
e∈P +
Combining this with (A.6) yields,
X
e∈∂Tp̂
w(e) · |∆e p̂| ≤ 1 + 6η · w(∂Tp̂ ).
(A.11)
With this bound, we can proceed as in the proof of Theorem 1. Normalizing (A.11) we obtain,
X
e∈∂Tp̂
w(e)
1
· |∆e p̂| ≤
+ 6η.
w(∂Tp̂ )
w(∂Tp̂ )
Since µ(e) = w(e)/w(∂Tp̂ ) is a probability distribution, analogously as in the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain
a set F ⊆ ∂Tp̂ by Markov’s inequality such that
• all edges f ∈ F satisfy |∆f p̂| ≤
2
w(∂Tp̂ )
+ 12η
• the set F is “large”, i.e. w(F ) = µ(F ) · w(∂Tp̂ ) ≥
21
1
2
· w(∂Tp̂ ).
Now, analogously as in the proof of Theorem 1, we get
vol(Tp̂−
2
−12η
w(∂Tp̂ )
Using mild expansion of Tp̂ , this implies
2
vol Tp̂−
c vol(Tp̂ )1/2+ε
) ≥ vol(Tp̂ ) +
−12η
1
· w(∂Tp̂ ).
2
c vol(Tp̂ )1/2+ε
.
2
≥ vol(Tp̂ ) +
Iterating this for ( 2c vol(Tp̂ )1/2−ε )-times, we obtain
vol T
2
p̂− c2 vol(T
2ε
p̂ )
−
24η·vol(Tp̂ )1/2−ε
c
!
(A.12)
≥ 2 vol(Tp̂ ).
Now, similarly we set p̂0 = p̂(s) and inductively extend this to p̂k for k > 0 by
24η · vol(Tp̂ )1/2−ε
2
−
.
c2 vol(Tp̂ )2ε
c
p̂k+1 = p̂k −
Since s ∈ Tp̂0 , we know vol(Tp̂0 ) ≥ deg(s), and by (A.12) vol(Tp̂k ) ≥ 2k deg(s). There exists some k ⋆ . log n
satisfying,
vol(G) ≥ 2 vol(Tp̂k⋆ ) ≥ vol(G)/2.
(A.13)
It follows that
⋆
p̂k⋆ − p̂0 =
k
X
j=0
k⋆
X 24η · vol(Tp̂ )1/2−ε
2
+
.
2
2ε
c vol(Tp̂ )
c
j=0
Using the bound vol(Tp̂k ) ≥ 2k deg(s) and the geometric sum formula, we have
⋆
p̂
k⋆
− p̂0 .
k
X
j=0
k⋆
k⋆
X 24η · vol(Tp̂ )1/2−ε
X 24η · vol(Tp̂ )1/2−ε
1
2
+
+
≤ 2
.
2
j2ε
2ε
2ε
c 2 deg(s)
c
εc deg(s)
c
j=0
j=0
Using the naive bounds vol(Tp̂ ) ≤ m and k ⋆ . log n, we obtain
p̂k⋆ − p̂0 .
24η · m1/2−ε log n
1
+
.
εc2 deg(s)2ε
c
Using similar arguments (sending flow from t to s), we see that more than half the volume of the vertices
has p̂ potential difference at least
1
24η · m1/2−ε log n
+
εc2 deg(t)2ε
c
to the vertex t. Therefore, we can prove the following potential difference upper-bound with respect to p̂,
p̂(s) − p̂(t) ≤
1
εc2 deg(s)2ε
+
1
εc2 deg(t)2ε
+
48η · m1/2−ε log n
.
c
Using the triangle inequality,
p(s) − p(t) ≤ p̂(s) − p̂(t) + |p̂(s) − p(s)| + |p̂(t) − p(t)| ≤ p̂(s) − p̂(t) + 2η.
22
We can conclude that
p(s) − p(t) ≤
=
εc2
1
1
48η · m1/2−ε log n
+ 2
+
+ 2η
2ε
2ε
deg(s)
εc deg(t)
c
εc2
1
1
η(48m1/2−ε log n + 2c)
+ 2
+
.
2ε
2ε
deg(s)
εc deg(t)
c
Noting that p(s) − p(t) = Reff(s, t) completes the proof.
We use the above result to complete the proof of our algorithmic result, in which we will choose η.
Corollary 14. Let G = (V, E, w) be a connected weighted graph. If deg(v) ≥ 1/α for all v ∈ V , then for
any 0 < ǫ < 1/2, there is a cut (U, U c ) such that
αε
· vol(U )ε−1/2 .
Φ(U ) . √
Rdiam · ε
w(E)
e m · log
Further, the set U can be found in time O
.
mine w(e)
Proof. The proof will be the same as that of Corollary 2. For Corollary 2, we used Theorem 1 to get our
non-expanding cut, here we will use Theorem 13. By Lemma 7, we can compute vertices u, v ∈ V which
satisfies,
Reff(u, v) ≥ Rdiam /3
e
in time O(m).
As in Corollary 2, we pick
c≍
s
1
deg(u)2ε
+
1
deg(v)2ε
Rdiam · ε
.
To contradict the bound from Theorem 13 asymptotically, we need to pick η to satisfy
1
η · (48 · m1/2−ε log n + 2c)
1
1
≥
·
+
.
εc2
deg(u)2ε
deg(v)2ε
c
This will allow us to ignore the additional error term we get in the proof of Theorem 13, by settling for a
bigger constant that will be hidden in the .-notation.
By the AM-GM inequality, the choice
η :=
1
·
ε·c
1
1
+
deg(u)2ε
deg(v)2ε
23
1
·p
96 · m1/2 log n
certainly satisfies this. Note that
η
=
&
≍
&
≥
1
1
1
1
·p
+
·
ε·c
deg(u)2ε
deg(v)2ε
96 · m1/2 log n
1
1
1
·p
·
1/2
ε · c3/2 w(E)2ε
m log n
!3/4
1
1
Rdiam · ε
1
·
·p
·
1
1
2ε
1/2 log n
ε
w(E)
+
2ε
2ε
m
deg(u)
deg(v)
3/4
1
1
1
·
·p
· Rdiam · ε · (min w(e))2ε
2ε
1/2
e
ε
w(E)
m log n
3
Rdiam 4 ·
(mine w(e))3ε/2
1
·p
.
1/2
w(E)2ε
m log n
Since the smallest possible Rdiam is when all the edges act as parallel resistors between two vertices, we have
Rdiam ≥ P
1
e∈E w(e)
=
1
.
w(E)
Plugging this into the above computation, we get
η&
(mine w(e))3ε/2
1
·p
.
3/4+2ε
1/2
w(E)
m log n
(A.14)
Using this with Lemma 12, we see that we need to pick
ζ≍
η · (mine w(e))2
1
(mine w(e))2+3ε/2
√
·p
&
.
3/2
w(E) · m
w(E)7/4+2ε
m log n
as the accuracy for the Spielman-Teng solver.
In particular, this means that the Laplacian solver will take time
w(E)
w(E)
e
e m · polylog(m) + m · log
e m · log
O(m
· log(1/ζ)) = O
=O
.
mine w(e)
mine w(e)
The rest of the proof follows as in Corollary 2.
24
(A.15)
| 8cs.DS
|
Optimal Key Consensus in Presence of Noise∗
Zhengzhong Jin†
Yunlei Zhao‡
arXiv:1611.06150v4 [cs.IT] 6 Oct 2017
Abstract
In this work, we abstract some key ingredients in previous LWE- and RLWE-based key
exchange protocols, by introducing and formalizing the building tool, referred to as key consensus (KC) and its asymmetric variant AKC. KC and AKC allow two communicating parties
to reach consensus from close values obtained by some secure information exchange. We then
discover upper bounds on parameters for any KC and AKC, which bounds what could or
couldn’t be done for the various parameters involved. KC and AKC are fundamental to lattice based cryptography, in the sense that a list of cryptographic primitives based on LWR,
LWE and RLWE (including key exchange, public-key encryption, and more) can be modularly constructed from them. As a conceptual contribution, this much simplifies the design
and analysis of these cryptosystems in the future.
We then design and analyze both general and almost optimal KC and AKC schemes, which
are referred to as OKCN and AKCN respectively for presentation simplicity. Based on KC
and AKC, we present generic constructions of key exchange from LWR, LWE and RLWE. The
generic construction allows versatile instantiations with our OKCN and AKCN schemes, for
which we elaborate on evaluating and choosing the concrete parameters in order to achieve
an optimally-balanced performance among security, computational cost, bandwidth efficiency,
error rate, and operation simplicity.
• We propose the first construction of key exchange based on the learning with rounding
(LWR) problem, to the best of our knowledge. The rounding in LWR much reduces
the bandwidth. We provide a delicate approach to calculating the error rate accurately,
which avoids introducing some cumbersome inequalities in the traditional ways of error
rate estimation. The accuracy of error rate allows us to choose tight parameters. Our
LWR-based key exchange costs 16.39 kilo-bytes (kB) with error rate 2−35 at the level of
at least 128-bit quantum security.
• When applied to LWE-based cryptosystems, OKCN and AKCN can directly result in
more practical schemes of key exchange and CPA-secure public-key encryption. To
further save bandwidth, we make a thorough analysis of the variant where some least
significant bits of LWE samples are cut off. For instance, on recommended parameters our LWE-based protocol (resp., Frodo) has 18.58kB (resp., 22.57kB) bandwidth,
887.15kB (resp., 1060.32kB) matrix, at least 134-bit (resp., 130-bit) quantum security,
and error rate 2−39 (resp., 2−38.9 ).
• When applied to RLWE-based cryptosystems, we make a key observation by proving that
the errors in different positions in the shared-key are essentially independent. Based upon
this observation, we present an extremely simple and fast code, referred to as single-error
correction (SEC) code, to correct at least one bit error. By equipping OKCN/AKCN
with the SEC code, we achieve the simplest RLWE-based key exchange (up to now) with
negligible error rate for much longer shared-key size; for instance, 837-bit shared-key
with bandwidth of about 0.4kB and error rate 2−69 .
∗
This research was supported in part by NSFC Grant No. U1536205.
School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. [email protected].
‡
School of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. [email protected]
†
1
Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Our Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2 Subsequent or Concurrent Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
5
6
2 Preliminaries
2.1 The LWE, LWR, and RLWE problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
7
3 Key Consensus with Noise
3.1 Efficiency Upper Bound of KC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Construction and Analysis of OKCN . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.1 Correctness and Security of OKCN . . . . . . . . .
3.2.2 Special Parameters, and Performance Speeding-Up
4 Asymmetric Key Consensus with Noise
4.1 Construction and Analysis of AKCN . . . . . . .
4.1.1 Correctness and Security of AKCN . . . .
4.1.2 A Simplified Variant of AKCN for Special
4.2 On KC/AKC vs. Fuzzy Extractor . . . . . . . .
5 LWR-Based Key Exchange from KC
5.1 Correctness Analysis . . . . . . . . .
5.2 Security Proof . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3 Parameter Selection and Evaluation
5.3.1 Discrete Distribution . . . . .
5.3.2 Proposed Parameters . . . . .
5.3.3 Security Estimation . . . . .
and AKC
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
. 9
. 11
. 11
. 12
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
Parameters
. . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
14
16
16
17
18
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
18
19
21
25
25
26
26
6 LWE-Based Key Exchange from KC and AKC
6.1 Noise Distributions and Correctness . . . . . . . .
6.1.1 Binary Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.2 Discrete Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.3 Instantiations, and Comparisons with Frodo
6.1.4 Security Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
27
29
30
31
32
32
7 Hybrid Construction of Key Exchange from LWE and LWR in the Public-Key
Setting
33
7.1 Security and Error Rate Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
7.2 Parameter Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
8 RLWE-Based Key Exchange from KC and AKC
8.1 RLWE-Based Key Exchange with Negligible Error Rate
8.2 On the Independence of Errors in Different Positions . .
8.3 Reducing Error Rate with Single-Error Correction Code
8.3.1 Single-Error Correction Code . . . . . . . . . . .
8.3.2 AKC and KC with SEC code . . . . . . . . . . .
9 Performance Comparison: Benchmark
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
36
37
38
40
40
41
43
10 More Applications and Future Works
11 ZarZar: RLWE-Based Key Exchange
11.1 E8 and its Encoding and Decoding .
11.2 Parameters and Implementation . .
11.2.1 Parameters . . . . . . . . . .
11.2.2 Noise distribution . . . . . .
11.2.3 Benchmark . . . . . . . . . .
11.3 Error Rate Analysis . . . . . . . . .
45
from KC and AKC
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
45
46
48
49
49
50
50
A Consensus Mechanism of Frodo
57
B Consensus Mechanism of NewHope
57
C Security Analysis of LWE-Based Key Exchange
58
D Construction and Analysis of AKCN-4:1
61
D.1 Overview of NewHope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
D.2 Construction and Analysis of AKCN-4:1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
E Implementing HxT in SEC with Simple Bit Operations
63
F A Note on Lizard
64
3
1
Introduction
Most public-key cryptosystems currently in use, based on the hardness of solving (elliptic curve)
discrete logarithm or factoring large integers, will be broken, if large-scale quantum computers
are ever built. The arrival of such quantum computers is now believed by many scientists to be
merely a significant engineering challenge, and is estimated by engineers at IBM to be within
the next two decades or so. Historically, it has taken almost two decades to deploy the modern
public key cryptography infrastructure. Therefore, regardless of whether we can estimate the
exact time of the arrival of the quantum computing era, we must begin now to prepare our
information security systems to be able to resist quantum computing [NIS]. In addition, for the
content we want to protect over a period of 15 years or longer, it becomes necessary to switch
to post-quantum cryptography today. This has been recognized not only by the cryptography
research community, but also by standardization bodies and leading information companies, for
example, NSA [NSA], NIST [NIS], U.K. CESG [CESG], the Tor project [Nic], and Google [Mat].
As noted in [ADPS16,AJS16], in the majority of contexts the most critical asymmetric primitive to upgrade to post-quantum security is ephemeral key exchange (KE). KE plays a central role
in modern cryptography, which bridges public-key cryptography and symmetric-key cryptography
and can, in turn, be used to build CPA-secure public-key encryption (PKE) as well as CCA-secure
PKE in the random oracle (RO) model via the FO-transformation [FO13,Pei14,TU15], and more.
U.K. CESG has also expressed their preference for post-quantum algorithms (in particular, postquantum KE schemes) over quantum technologies “such as Quantum Key Distribution” to counter
the threat of quantum computing [CESG].
Lattice-based cryptography is among the major mathematical approaches to achieving security resistant to quantum attacks. For cryptographic usage, compared with the classic hard
lattice problems such as SVP and CVP, the learning with errors (LWE) problem is proven to
be much more versatile [Reg09]. Nevertheless, LWE-based cryptosystems are usually less efficient, which was then resolved by the introduction of the ring-LWE (RLWE) problem [LPR13a].
In recent years, large numbers of impressive works are developed from LWE and RLWE, with
(ephemeral) key exchange and public-key encryption being the study focus of this work [JD12,
Pei14, BCNS15, ADPS16, BCD+ 16, Reg09, GPV08, LP10, LPR13a, LPR13b, PG13]. For an excellent survey of lattice-based cryptography, the reader is referred to [Pei16].
Some celebrating progresses on achieving practical LWE- and RLWE-based key exchange are
made in recent years. The performance of RLWE-based key exchange is significantly improved
with NewHope [ADPS16], which achieves 256-bit shared-key with error rate about 2−61 . The
negligible error rate of NewHope is achieved by decoding the four-dimensional lattice D̃4 . Decoding the 24-dimensional Leech lattice is also recently considered in [Pop16]. But decoding the
four-dimensional lattice D̃4 has already been relatively complicated and computationally less efficient. Compared to LWE, the additional ring structure of RLWE helps to improve the efficiency
of cryptosystems, but the concrete hardness of RLWE remains less clear. The work [BCD+ 16]
proposes a key exchange protocol Frodo only based on LWE, and demonstrates that LWE-based
key exchange can be practical as well. Nevertheless, bandwidth of Frodo is relatively large, as
Frodo uses about 22kB bandwidth for its recommended parameter set. In addition, Frodo has
relatively large error rates, and cannot be directly used for PKE. Whether further improvements
on LWE- and RLWE-based key exchange, as well as CPA-secure PKE, can be achieved remains
an interesting question of practical significance.
4
One of the main technical contributions in the works [ADPS16,BCD+ 16,PG13], among others,
is the improvement and generalization of the key reconciliation mechanisms [Pei14, JD12].1 But
the key reconciliation mechanisms were only previously used and analyzed, for both KE and
PKE, in a non-black-box way. This means, for new key reconciliation mechanisms developed in
the future to be used for constructing lattice-based cryptosystems, we need to make analysis from
scratch. Also, for the various parameters involved in key reconciliation, the bounds on what could
or couldn’t be achieved are unclear.
1.1
Our Contributions
In this work, we abstract some key ingredients in previous LWE- and RLWE-based key exchange
protocols, by introducing and formalizing the building tool, referred to as key consensus (KC)
and its asymmetric variant AKC. KC and AKC allow two communicating parties to reach consensus from close values obtained by some secure information exchange, such as exchanging their
LWE/RLWE samples. We then discover upper bounds on parameters for any KC and AKC, and
make comparisons between KC/AKC and fuzzy extractor [DORS08]. KC and AKC are fundamental to lattice based cryptography, in the sense that a list of cryptographic primitives based
on LWE or RLWE (including key exchange, public-key encryption, and more) can be modularly
constructed from them. As a conceptual contribution, this much simplifies the design and analysis
of these cryptosystems in the future.
We then design and analyze both general and highly practical KC and AKC schemes, which are
referred to as OKCN and AKCN respectively for presentation simplicity. Our OKCN and AKCN
schemes are optimal in a sense of achieving optimal balance among security, (computational and
bandwidth) efficiency, and operation simplicity. Firstly, the correctness constraints on parameters
are almost the same as the upper bounds we discovered. Secondly, the generality of our schemes
allows us to take optimal balance among parameters in order to choose parameters towards
different goals. Thirdly, the operations involved are simple.
Based on KC and AKC, we present generic constructions of key exchange from LWR,LWE
and RLWE with delicate analysis of error rates. Then, for the instantiations of these generic
constructions with our OKCN and AKCN schemes, we elaborate on evaluating and choosing
the concrete parameters in order to achieve an optimally-balanced performance among security,
computational efficiency, bandwidth efficiency, error rate, and operation simplicity.
• We propose the first construction of key exchange based on the learning with rounding
(LWR) problem, to the best of our knowledge. The rounding in LWR much reduces the
bandwidth. We provide a delicate approach to calculating the error rate accurately, which
avoids introducing some cumbersome inequalities in the traditional ways of error rate estimation. The accuracy of error rate allows us to choose tight parameters. Our LWR-based
key exchange costs 16.39kB with error rate 2−35 at the level of at least 128-bit quantum
security.
• When applied to LWE-based cryptosystems, OKCN and AKCN can directly result in more
practical or well-balanced schemes of key exchange and CPA-secure public-key encryption.
To further save bandwidth, we make a thorough analysis of the variant where some least
1
To our knowledge, the key reconciliation mechanism in [Pei14] is the first that fits our KC definition (the
mechanism in [JD12] requires the distance be of special types). The Lindner-Peikert mechanism implicitly presented
for PKE [LP10] is the first that fits our AKC definition. The reader is referred to [ADPS16b] for a detailed survey
on key exchange from LWE and RLWE.
5
significant bits of LWE samples are cut off. We remark that cutting off some least bits of
LWE samples can only improve the actual security guarantee in reality, but complicates the
analysis of error rates. For instance, on recommended parameters our LWE-based protocol
(resp., Frodo) has 18.58kB (resp., 22.57kB) bandwidth, 887.15kB (resp., 1060.32kB) matrix,
at least 134-bit (resp., 130-bit) quantum security, and error rate 2−39 (resp., 2−38.9 ).
• When applied to RLWE-based cryptosystems, to the best of our knowledge, AKCN can
lead to more (bandwidth) efficient schemes of CPA-secure PKE and AKC-based KE with
negligible error rate. In order to achieve 256-bit shared-key with negligible error rate,
we use the technique of NewHope by encoding and decoding the four-dimensional lattice
D̃4 , which results in a protocol named AKCN-4:1 that is (slightly) better than NewHopesimple [ADPS16b] in bandwidth expansion.
However, encoding and decoding D̃4 is relatively complicated and computationally less
efficient. In this work, we make a key observation on RLWE-based key exchange, by proving
that the errors in different positions in the shared-key are almost independent. Based
upon this observation, we present an super simple and fast code, referred to as single-error
correction (SEC) code, to correct at least one bit error. By equipping OKCN/AKCN with
the SEC code, we achieve the simplest (up to now) RLWE-based key exchange, from both
OKCN and AKCN, with negligible error rate for much longer shared-key size; for instance,
837-bit shared-key with bandwidth of about 0.4kB and error rate 2−69 .
Finally, we briefly discuss the applications of OKCN and AKCN to public-key encryption,
authenticated key exchange, key transport, and TLS. As a fundamental building tool for latticebased cryptographic schemes, we suggest OKCN, AKCN and the various KE protocols based
on them are of independent value. They may possibly find more applications in more advanced
cryptographic primitives (e.g., oblivious transfer, IBE, ABE, FHE) from LWR, LWE and RLWE,
by simplifying their design and analysis with versatile performance optimization or balance.
All the main protocols developed in this work are implemented. The code and scripts, together
with those for evaluating concrete security and error rates, are available from Github http:
//github.com/OKCN.
1.2
Subsequent or Concurrent Works
A PKE scheme, named Lizard, is recently presented in [CKLS16]. It is easy to see that the underlying key consensus mechanism of Lizard is just instantiated from our AKCN scheme presented
in Algorithm 4 (see more details in Appendix F).2
Recently, we notice that an AKC-based variant of NewHope, named NewHope-simple, was presented in a note [ADPS16b]. In comparison, NewHope-simple is still slightly inferior to AKCN4:1RLWE in bandwidth expansion (specifically, 256 vs. 1024 bits), and our SEC-equipped protocols
are simpler, have lower error rates and much longer shared-key sizes.
2
AKCN was introduced at the second Asian PQC Forum (APQC 2016) on November 28, 2016, in Seoul, Korea,
and was filed and publicly available even earlier. The original version of Lizard was also presented at APQC 2016.
But we note that, according to the video presentation available from http://www.pqcforum.org/, the underlying
key consensus mechanism of Lizard presented as APQC 2016 was based on the Lindner-Peikert mechanism [LP10],
not our AKCN mechanism as appeared in the later ePrint report [CKLS16].
6
2
Preliminaries
A string or value α means a binary one, and |α| is its binary length. For any real number x, bxc
denotes the largest integer that less than or equal to x, and bxe = bx + 1/2c. For any positive
integers a and b, denote by lcm(a, b) the least common multiple of them. For any i, j ∈ Z such
that i < j, denote by [i, j] the set of integers {i, i + 1, · · · , j − 1, j}. For any positive integer t,
we let Zt denote Z/tZ. The elements of Zt are represented, by default, as [0, t − 1]. Nevertheless,
sometimes, Zt is explicitly specified to be represented as [−b(t − 1)/2c, bt/2c].
If S is a finite set then |S| is its cardinality, and x ← S is the operation of picking an element
uniformly at random from S. For two sets A, B ⊆ Zq , define A + B , {a + b|a ∈ A, b ∈ B}.
For an addictive group (G, +), an element x ∈ G and a subset S ⊆ G, denote by x + S the set
containing x + s for all s ∈ S. For a set S, denote by U(S) the uniform distribution over S. For
any discrete random variable X over R, denote Supp(X) = {x ∈ R | Pr[X = x] > 0}.
We use standard notations and conventions below for writing probabilistic algorithms, experiments and interactive protocols. If D denotes a probability distribution, x ← D is the operation
of picking an element according to D. If α is neither an algorithm nor a set then x ← α is a
simple assignment statement. If A is a probabilistic algorithm, then A(x1 , x2 , · · · ; r) is the result
of running A on inputs x1 , x2 , · · · and coins r. We let y ← A(x1 , x2 , · · · ) denote the experiment
of picking r at random and letting y be A(x1 , x2 , · · · ; r). By Pr[R1 ; · · · ; Rn : E] we denote the
probability of event E, after the ordered execution of random processes R1 , · · · , Rn .
We say that a function f (λ) is negligible, if for every c > 0 there exists an λc such that f (λ) <
1/λc for all λ > λc . Two distribution ensembles {X(λ, z)}λ∈N,z∈{0,1}∗ and {Y (λ, z)}λ∈N,z∈{0,1}∗
are computationally indistinguishable, if for any probabilistic polynomial-time (PPT) algorithm
D, and for sufficiently large λ and any z ∈ {0, 1}∗ , it holds | Pr[D(λ, z, X) = 1] − Pr[D(λ, z, Y ) =
1]| is negligible in λ.
2.1
The LWE, LWR, and RLWE problems
√
Given positive continuous α > 0, define the real Gaussian function ρα (x) , exp(−x2 /2α2 )/ 2πα2
for x ∈ R. Let DZ,α denote the one-dimensional discrete Gaussian distribution over Z, which is
determined by its probability density function DZ,α (x) , ρα (x)/ρα (Z), x ∈ Z. Finally, let DZn ,α
denote the n-dimensional spherical discrete Gaussian distribution over Zn , where each coordinate
is drawn independently from DZ,α .
Given positive integers n and q that are both polynomial in the security parameter λ, an
integer vector s ∈ Znq , and a probability distribution χ on Zq , let Aq,s,χ be the distribution over
Znq × Zq obtained by choosing a ∈ Znq uniformly at random, and an error term e ← χ, and
outputting the pair (a, b = aT s + e) ∈ Znq × Zq . The error distribution χ is typically taken to
be the discrete Gaussian probability distribution DZ,α defined previously; However, as suggested
in [BCD+ 16] and as we shall see in Section 6.1, other alternative distributions of χ can be taken.
Briefly speaking, the (decisional) learning with errors (LWE) assumption [Reg09] says that, for
sufficiently large security parameter λ, no probabilistic polynomial-time (PPT) algorithm can
distinguish, with non-negligible probability, Aq,s,χ from the uniform distribution over Znq × Zq .
This holds even if A sees polynomially many samples, and even if the secret vector s is drawn
randomly from χn [ACPS09].
The LWR problem [BPR12] is a “derandomized” variant of the LWE problem. Let D be some
distribution over Znq , and s ← D. For integers q ≥ p ≥ 2 and any x ∈ Zq , denote bxep = b pq xe.
Then, for positive integers n and q ≥ p ≥ 2, the LWR distribution An,q,p (s) over Znq × Zp is
7
obtained by sampling a from Znq uniformly at random, and outputting a, aT s p ∈ Znq × Zp .
The search LWR problem is to recover the hidden secret s given polynomially many samples
of An,q,p (s). Briefly speaking, the (decisional) LWR assumption says that, for sufficiently large
security parameter, no PPT algorithm A can distinguish, with non-negligible probability, the
distribution An,q,p (s) from the distribution (a ← Znq , buep ) where u ← Zq . This holds even if A
sees polynomially many samples.
An efficient reduction from the LWE problem to the LWR problem, for super-polynomial
large q, is provided in [BPR12]. Let B denote the bound for any component in the secret s. It
is recently shown that, when q ≥ 2mBp (equivalently, m ≤ q/2Bp), the LWE problem can be
reduced to the (decisional) LWR assumption with m independently random samples [BGM+ 16].
Moreover, the reduction from LWE to LWR is actually independent of the distribution of the
secret s.
For the positive integer m that is polynomial in the security parameter λ, let n , ϕ(m) denote
the totient of m, and K , Q(ζm ) be the number field obtained by adjoining an abstract element
ζm satisfying Φm (ζm ) = 0, where Φm (x) ∈ Z[x] is the m-th cyclotomic polynomial of degree n.
Moreover, let R , OK be the ring of integers in K. Finally, given a positive prime q = poly(λ)
such that q ≡ 1 (mod m), define the quotient ring Rq , R/qR.
We briefly review the RLWE problem, and its hardness result [LPR13a,LPR13b,DD12]. As we
shall see, it suffices in this work to consider a special case of the original ring-LWE problem defined
in [LPR13a]. Let n ≥ 16 be a power-of-two and q = poly(λ) be a positive prime such that q ≡ 1
(mod 2n). Given s ← Rq , a sample drawn from the RLWE distribution An,q,α,s over Rq × Rq is
generated by first choosing a ← Rq , e ← DZn ,α , and then outputting (a, a · s + e) ∈ Rq × Rq .
Roughly speaking, the (decisional) RLWE assumption says that, for sufficiently large security
parameter λ, no PPT algorithm A can distinguish, with non-negligible probability, An,q,α,s from
the uniform distribution over Rq × Rq . This holds even if A sees polynomially many samples,
and even if the secret s is drawn randomly from the same distribution of the error polynomial
e [DD12, ACPS09]. Moreover, as suggested in [ADPS16], alternative distributions for the error
polynomials can be taken for the sake of efficiency while without essentially reducing security.
3
Key Consensus with Noise
Before presenting the definition of key consensus (KC) scheme, we first introduce a new function
| · |t relative to arbitrary positive integer t ≥ 1:
|x|t = min{x mod t, t − x mod t},
∀x ∈ Z,
where the result of modular operation is represented in {0, ..., (t − 1)}. For instance, | − 1|t =
min{−1 mod t, (t+1) mod t} = min{t−1, 1} = 1. In the following description, we use |σ1 −σ2 |q
to measure the distance between two elements σ1 , σ2 ∈ Zq . In this work, such a distance is caused
by small noises, and is relatively small compared to q.
8
Alice
σ1 ∈ Zq
(k1 , v) ← Con(σ1 , params)
≈
Bob
σ2 ∈ Zq
v
k2 ← Rec(σ2 , v, params)
Figure 1: Brief depiction of KC, where k1 , k2 ∈ Zm , v ∈ Zg and |σ1 − σ2 |q ≤ d.
Definition 3.1. A key consensus scheme KC = (params, Con, Rec), briefly depicted in Figure 1,
is specified as follows.
• params = (q, m, g, d, aux) denotes the system parameters,3 where q, m, g, d are positive integers satisfying 2 ≤ m, g ≤ q, 0 ≤ d ≤ b 2q c (which dominate security, correctness and
bandwidth of the KC scheme), and aux denotes some auxiliary values that are usually determined by (q, m, g, d) and could be set to be a special symbol ∅ indicating “empty”.
• (k1 , v) ← Con(σ1 , params): On input of (σ1 ∈ Zq , params), the probabilistic polynomial-time
conciliation algorithm Con outputs (k1 , v), where k1 ∈ Zm is the shared-key, and v ∈ Zg is
a hint signal that will be publicly delivered to the communicating peer to help the two parties
reach consensus.
• k2 ← Rec(σ2 , v, params): On input of (σ2 ∈ Zq , v, params), the deterministic polynomialtime reconciliation algorithm Rec outputs k2 ∈ Zm .
Correctness: A KC scheme is correct, if it holds k1 = k2 for any σ1 , σ2 ∈ Zq such that |σ1 −
σ2 |q ≤ d.
Security: A KC scheme is secure, if k1 and v are independent, and k1 is uniformly distributed
over Zm , whenever σ1 ← Zq (i.e., σ1 is taken uniformly at random from Zq ). The probability
is taken over the sampling of σ1 and the random coins used by Con.
3.1
Efficiency Upper Bound of KC
For fixed q, g, d, we expect the two communicating parties to reach as more consensus bits as
possible, so the range of consensus key m can be regarded as an indicator of efficiency. The
following theorem reveals an upper bound on the range of consensus key of a KC with parameters
q, g (parameterize bandwidth), and d (parameterize correctness). Its proof also divulges some
intrinsic properties of any correct and secure KC scheme.
Theorem 3.1. If KC = (params, Con, Rec) is a correct and secure key consensus scheme, and
params = (q, m, g, d, aux), then
1
.
2md ≤ q 1 −
g
Remark: Some comments are in order. Theorem 3.1 divulges an efficiency upper bound on the
system parameters of KC schemes, and allows us to take balance on these parameters according to
different priorities among security, computational efficiency and bandwidth consumption. When
3
In practice, the system parameters are usually set by the higher-level protocol that calls KC.
9
balancing these parameters, we are mainly concerned with the parameters (q, d, m), with a focus
on the parameter q that dominates the security and efficiency of the underlying KC scheme. The
parameter g is mainly related to bandwidth. But the bandwidth reduction with a smaller g can
be overtaken by the overall efficiency gains with a smaller q.
Before proceeding to prove Theorem 3.1, we first prove the following propositions.
Proposition 3.1. Given params = (q, m, g, d, aux) for a correct and secure KC scheme. For any
arbitrary fixed σ1 ∈ Zq , if Con(σ1 , params) outputs (k1 , v) with positive prabability, then the value
k1 is fixed w.r.t. the (v, σ1 ). That is, for any random coins (r, r0 ), if Con(σ1 , params, r) = (k1 , v)
and Con(σ1 , params, r0 ) = (k10 , v), then k1 = k10 .
Proof. Let σ2 = σ1 , then |σ1 − σ2 |q = 0 ≤ d. Then, according to the correctness of KC, we have
that k1 = k2 = Rec(σ2 , v) = Rec(σ1 , v). However, as Rec is a deterministic algorithm, k2 is fixed
w.r.t. (σ1 , v). As a consequence, k1 is also fixed w.r.t. (σ1 , v), no matter what randomness is
used by Con.
Proposition 3.2. Given params = (q, m, g, d, aux) for a KC scheme, for any v ∈ Zg , let Sv be
the set containing all σ1 such that Con(σ1 , params) outputs v with positive probability. Specifically,
Sv = σ1 ∈ Zq | Pr (k1 , v 0 ) ← Con(σ1 , params) : v 0 = v > 0 .
Then, there exists v0 ∈ Zg such that |Sv0 | ≥ q/g.
Proof. For each σ1 ∈ Zq , we run Con(σ1 , params) and get a pair (k1 , v) ∈ Zm × Zg satisfying
σ1 ∈ Sv . Then, the proposition is clear by the pigeonhole principle.
Proof of Theorem 3.1. From Proposition 3.2, there exists a v0 ∈ Zg such that |Sv0 | ≥ q/g. Note
that, for any σ1 ∈ Sv0 , Con(σ1 , params) outputs v0 with positive probability.
For each i ∈ Zm , let Ki denote the set containing all σ1 such that Con(σ1 , params) outputs
(k1 = i, v = v0 ) with positive probability. From Proposition 3.1, Ki ’s form a disjoint partition
of Sv0 . From the independence between k1 and v, and the uniform distribution of k1 , (as we
assume the underlying KC is secure), we know Pr[k1 = i | v = v0 ] = Pr[k1 = i] > 0, and so Ki is
non-empty for each i ∈ Zm . Now, for each i ∈ Zm , denote by Ki0 the set containing all σ2 ∈ Zq
such that Rec(σ2 , v0 , params) = i. As Rec is deterministic, Ki0 ’s are well-defined and are disjoint.
From the correctness of KC, for every σ1 ∈ Ki , |σ2 − σ1 |q ≤ d, we have σ2 ∈ Ki0 . That is,
Ki + [−d, d] ⊆ Ki0 .
We shall prove that Ki + [−d, d] contains at least |Ki | + 2d elements. If Ki + [−d, d] = Zm ,
then m = 1, which is a contradiction (we exclude the case of m = 1 in the definition of KC as it is
a trivial case). If there exists an x ∈ Zm such that x ∈
/ Ki + [−d, d], we can see Zm as a segment
starting from the point x by arranging its elements as x, (x + 1) mod m, (x + 2) mod m, . . . , (x +
m − 1) mod m. Let l be the left most element in Ki + [−d, d] on the segment, and r be the right
most such element. Then Ki + [−d, d] contains at least |Ki | elements between l and r inclusively
on the segment. Since l + [−d, 0] and r + [0, d] are subset of Ki + [−d, d], and are not overlap
(because x ∈
/ Ki + [−d, d]), the set Ki + [−d, d] contains at least |Ki | + 2d elements.
Now we have |Ki | + 2d ≤ |Ki0 |. When we add up on both sides for all i ∈ Zm , then we derive
|Sv0 | + 2md ≤ q. By noticing that |Sv0 | ≥ q/g, the theorem is established.
10
3.2
Construction and Analysis of OKCN
The key consensus scheme, named “optimally-balanced key consensus with noise (OKCN)”, is
presented in Algorithm 1, followed with some explanations for implementation details.
0 = ασ +e. Note that it always holds σ 0 < q 0 . However, in some rare cases, σ 0 could
Define σA
1
A
A
be a negative value; for example, for the case that σ1 = 0 and e ∈ [−b(α − 1)/2c, −1]. Setting
0 mod q 0 , in line 4, is to ensure that σ is always a non-negative value in Z 0 , which
σA = σA
A
q
0 < 0 then set σ = σ 0 + q 0 , otherwise set σ = σ 0 .
can be simply implemented as follows: if σA
A
A
A
A
0 is negative or
Considering potential timing attacks, conditional statement judging whether σA
0 . In specific, suppose σ 0
not can be avoided by a bitwise operation extracting the sign bit of σA
A
0 + ((σ 0 >> 15)&1) ∗ q 0 in C
is a 16-bit signed or unsigned integer, then one can code σA = σA
A
language. The same techniques can also be applied to the calculation in line 11.
In lines 5 and 6, (k1 , v 0 ) can actually be calculated simultaneously by a single command div in
assembly language. In line 11, the floating point arithmetic can be replaced by integer arithmetic.
If m is small enough, such as 2 or 3, the slow complex integer division operation can be replaced
by relative faster conditional statements.
Algorithm 1 OKCN: Optimally-balanced KC with Noise
1: params = (q, m, g, d, aux), aux = {q 0 = lcm(q, m), α = q 0 /q, β = q 0 /m}
2: procedure Con((σ1 , params))
3:
e ← [−b(α − 1)/2c, bα/2c]
4:
σA = (ασ1 + e) mod q 0
5:
k1 = bσA /βc ∈ Zm
6:
v 0 = σA mod β
7:
v = bv 0 g/βc
8:
return (k1 , v)
9: end procedure
10: procedure Rec(σ2 , v, params)
11:
k2 = bασ2 /β − (v + 1/2)/ge mod m
12:
return k2
13: end procedure
. σ1 ∈ [0, q − 1]
. v ∈ Zg
. σ2 ∈ [0, q − 1]
The value v + 1/2, in line 11, estimates the exact value of v 0 g/β. Such an estimation can
be more accurate, if one chooses to use the average value of all v 0 g/β’s such that bv 0 g/βc = v.
Though such accuracy can improve the bound on correctness slightly, the formula calculating k2
becomes more complicated.
3.2.1
Correctness and Security of OKCN
Recall that, for arbitrary positive integer t ≥ 1 and any x ∈ Z, |x|t = min{x mod t, t − x mod t}.
Then, the following fact is direct from the definition of | · |t .
Fact 3.1. For any x, y, t, l ∈ Z where t ≥ 1 and l ≥ 0, if |x − y|q ≤ l, then there exists θ ∈ Z and
δ ∈ [−l, l] such that x = y + θt + δ.
Theorem 3.2. Suppose that the system parameters satisfy (2d + 1)m < q 1 − g1 where m ≥ 2
and g ≥ 2. Then, the OKCN scheme is correct.
11
Proof. Suppose |σ1 − σ2 |q ≤ d. By Fact 3.1, there exist θ ∈ Z and δ ∈ [−d, d] such that
σ2 = σ1 + θq + δ. From line 4 and 6 in Algorithm 1, we know that there is a θ0 ∈ Z, such that
ασ1 + e + θ0 q 0 = σA = k1 β + v 0 . And from the definition of α, β, we have α/β = m/q. Taking
these into the formula of k2 in Rec (line 11 in Algorithm 1), we have
k2 = bασ2 /β − (v + 1/2)/ge mod m
= bα(θq + σ1 + δ)/β − (v + 1/2)/ge mod m
1
αδ 1
0
0
= m(θ − θ ) + (k1 β + v − e) +
− (v + 1/2) mod m
β
β
g
0
e
v + 1/2
αδ
v
− +
mod m
−
= k1 +
β
g
β
β
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Notice that |v 0 /β − (v + 1/2)/g| = |v 0 g − β(v + 1/2)|/βg ≤ 1/2g. So
0
v
v + 1/2
e
αδ
α
1
−
− +
+ (d + 1/2).
≤
β
g
β
β
2g β
From the assumed condition (2d + 1)m < q(1 − g1 ), we get that the right-hand side is strictly
smaller than 1/2; Consequently, after the rounding, k2 = k1 .
Theorem 3.3. OKCN is secure. Specifically, when σ1 ← Zq , k1 and v are independent, and k1
is uniform over Zm , where the probability is taken over the sampling of σ1 and the random coins
used by Con.
Proof. Recall that q 0 = lcm(q, m), α = q 0 /q, β = q 0 /m. We first demonstrate that σA is subject
to uniform distribution over Zq0 . Consider the map f : Zq × Zα → Zq0 ; f (σ, e) = (ασ + e) mod q 0 ,
where the elements in Zq and Zα are represented in the same way as specified in Algorithm 1. It
is easy to check that f is an one-to-one map. Since σ1 ← Zq and e ← Zα are subject to uniform
distributions, and they are independent, σA = (ασ1 + e) mod q 0 = f (σ1 , e) is also subject to
uniform distribution over Zq0 .
In the similar way, defining f 0 : Zm × Zβ → Zq0 such that f 0 (k1 , v 0 ) = βk1 + v 0 , then f 0 is
obviously a one-to-one map. From line 6 of Algorithm 1, f 0 (k1 , v 0 ) = σA . As σA is distributed
uniformly over Zq0 , (k1 , v 0 ) is uniformly distributed over Zm ×Zβ , and so k1 and v 0 are independent.
As v only depends on v 0 , k1 and v are independent.
3.2.2
Special Parameters, and Performance Speeding-Up
The first and the second line of Con (line 3 and 4 in Algorithm 1) play the role in transforming a
uniform distribution over Zq to a uniform distribution over Zq0 . If one chooses q, g, m to be power
of 2, i.e., q = 2q̄ , g = 2ḡ , m = 2m̄ where q̄, ḡ, m̄ ∈ Z, then such transformation is not necessary. In
this case Con and Rec can be simplified as follows:
12
Algorithm 2 OKCN power 2
1: params : q = 2q̄ , g = 2ḡ , m = 2m̄ , d, aux = {(β = q/m = 2q̄−m̄ , γ = β/g = 2q̄−m̄−ḡ )}
2: procedure Con(σ1 , params)
3:
k1 = bσ1 /βc
4:
v = b(σ1 mod β)/γc
5:
return (k1 , v)
6: end procedure
7: procedure Rec(σ2 , v, params)
8:
k2 = bσ2 /β − (v + 1/2)/ge mod m
9:
return k2
10: end procedure
Since the random noise e used in calculating σA in Algorithm 1 is avoided, the correctness
constraint on parameters can be relaxed, and we have the following corollary.
Corollary 3.1. If q and m are power of 2, and d, g, m satisfy 2md < q 1 − g1 , then the KC
scheme described in Algorithm 2 is both correct and secure.
Proof. For correctness, as no additional noise e is added, one can take e = 0 into Formula 4, and
then the correctness of Algorithm 2 directly follows from the proof of Theorem 3.2. For security,
as a variation of the generic structure of Algorithm 1, the security of Algorithm 2 inherits from
that of Algorithm 1.
If we take ḡ + m̄ = q̄, Algorithm 2 can be further simplified into the variant depicted in
Algorithm 3, with the constraint on parameters is further relaxed.
Corollary 3.2. If m, g are power of 2, q = m · g, and 2md < q, then the KC scheme described in
Algorithm 3 is correct and secure. Notice that the constraint on parameters is further simplified
to 2md < q in this case.
Proof. For correctness, supposing |σ1 − σ2 |q ≤ d, by Fact 3.1, there exist θ ∈ Z and δ ∈ [−d, d]
such that σ2 = σ1 + θq + δ. Taking this into line 8 of Algorithm 3, i.e., the formula computing
k2 , we have
k2 = b(σ1 − v + θq + δ)/ge mod m
= (k1 + θm + bδ/ge) mod m.
If 2md < q, then |δ/g| ≤ d/g < 1/2, so that k2 = k1 mod m = k1 .
For security, as a special case of generic scheme described in Algorithm 1, the security of
Algorithm 3 follows directly from that of Algorithm 1.
13
Algorithm 3 OKCN simple
1: params : q = 2q̄ , g = 2ḡ , m = 2m̄ , d, where ḡ + m̄ = q̄
2: procedure
Con(σ1 , params)
j k
σ1
3:
k1 = g
4:
v = σ1 mod g
5:
return (k1 , v)
6: end procedure
7: procedure
j Rec(σ
m 2 , v, params)
σ2 −v
8:
k2 =
mod m
g
9:
return k2
10: end procedure
4
Asymmetric Key Consensus with Noise
Alice
σ1
k1 ∈ Zm
v ← Con(σ1 , k1 , params)
≈
Bob
σ2
v
k2 ← Rec(σ2 , v, params)
Figure 2: Brief depiction of AKC
When OKCN is used as the building tool in constructing key exchange (KE) protocols, the party
who sends the hint signal v actually plays the role of the responder. When cast into secure
transport protocols in the client/server setting, e.g., the next generation of TLS 1.3 [Res], the
client (corresponding to Bob) plays the role of the initiator, and the server (corresponding to
Alice) plays the role of the responder. For OKCN-based key exchange, both the initiator and the
responder play a symmetric role in outputting the shared-key, in the sense that no one can predetermine the session-key before the KE protocol run. Specifically, the responder can calculate
the session-key only after receiving the ephemeral message from the initiator (unless the message
from the initiator is public or static). However, in some application scenarios particularly in the
client/server setting like those based upon TLS1.3, it is desirable to render the server asymmetric
power in predetermining session-keys before the protocol run, e.g., in order to balance workloads
and security or to resist the more and more vicious DDoS attacks. For example, this can much
reduce the online burden faced by the server, by offline or parallel computing the following
ciphertexts or MACs with the pre-determined session-keys.
Another motivation is that OKCN-based key exchange, with negligible failure probability,
cannot be directly transformed into a CPA-secure public-key encryption (PKE) scheme without
additionally employing a CPA-secure symmetric-key encryption (SKE) scheme. These motivate
us to introduce asymmetric key consensus with noise (AKCN), as depicted in Figure 2 and
specified below.
Definition 4.1. An asymmetric key consensus scheme AKC = (params, Con, Rec) is specified as
follows:
14
• params = (q, m, g, d, aux) denotes the system parameters, where q, 2 ≤ m, g ≤ q, 1 ≤ d ≤
b 2q c are positive integers, and aux denotes some auxiliary values that are usually determined
by (q, m, g, d) and could be set to be empty.
• v ← Con(σ1 , k1 , params): On input of (σ1 ∈ Zq , k1 ∈ Zm , params), the probabilistic polynomialtime conciliation algorithm Con outputs the public hint signal v ∈ Zg .
• k2 ← Rec(σ2 , v, params): On input of (σ2 , v, params), the deterministic polynomial-time
algorithm Rec outputs k2 ∈ Zm .
Correctness: An AKC scheme is correct, if it holds k1 = k2 for any σ1 , σ2 ∈ Zq such that
|σ1 − σ2 |q ≤ d.
Security: An AKC scheme is secure, if v is independent of k1 whenever σ1 is uniformly distributed over Zq . Specifically, for arbitrary ṽ ∈ Zg and arbitrary k̃1 , k̃10 ∈ Zm , it holds that
Pr[v = ṽ|k1 = k̃1 ] = Pr[v = ṽ|k1 = k̃10 ], where the probability is taken over σ1 ← Zq and the
random coins used by Con.
When AKC is used as a building tool for key exchange, k1 is taken uniformly at random from
Zq . However, when AKC is used for public-key encryption, k1 can be arbitrary value from the
space of plaintext messages.
For the efficiency upper bound of AKC, the following theorem divulges bounds on bandwidth
(parameterized by g), consensus range (parameterized by m), and correctness (parameterized by
d) for any AKC scheme.
Theorem 4.1. Let AKC = (params, Con, Rec) be an asymmetric key consensus scheme with
params = (q, m, d, g, aux). If AKC is correct and secure, then
m
2md ≤ q 1 −
.
g
Comparing the formula 2md ≤ q(1 − m/g) in Theorem 4.1 with the formula 2md ≤ q(1 − 1/g)
in Theorem 3.1, we see that the only difference is a factor m in g. This indicates that, on the
same values of (q, m, d), an AKC scheme has to use a bigger bandwidth parameter g compared to
KC. Before proving Theorem 4.1, we first adjust Proposition 3.2 to the AKC setting, as following.
Proposition 4.1. Given params = (q, m, g, d, aux) for an correct and secure AKC scheme, then
there exists v0 ∈ Zg such that |Sv0 | ≥ mq/g.
Proof. If k1 is taken uniformly at random from Zm , AKC can be considered as a special KC scheme
by treating k1 ← Zm ; v ← Con(σ1 , k1 , params) as (k1 , v) ← Con(σ1 , params). Consequently, Propo4
sition 3.1 holds for this case. Denote Sv0 = {(σ1 , k1 ) ∈ Zq × Zm | Pr [v 0 ← Con(σ1 , k1 , params) : v 0 = v] > 0}.
Then, Sv defined in Proposition 3.2 equals to the set containing all the values of σ1 appeared
in (σ1 , ·) ∈ Sv0 . We run Con(σ1 , k1 , params) for each pair of (σ1 , k1 ) ∈ Zq × Zm . By the pigeonhole principle, there must exist a v0 ∈ Zg such that |Sv0 0 | ≥ qm/g. For any two pairs
(σ1 , k1 ) and (σ10 , k10 ) in Sv0 0 , if σ1 = σ10 , from Proposition 3.1 we derive that k1 = k10 , and
then (σ1 , k1 ) = (σ10 , k10 ). Hence, if (σ1 , k1 ) and (σ10 , k10 ) are different, then σ1 6= σ10 , and so
|Sv0 | = |Sv0 0 | ≥ mq/g.
Proof of Theorem 4.1. By viewing AKC, with k1 ← Zq , as a special KC scheme, all the reasoning
in the proof of Theorem 3.1 holds true now. At the end of the proof of Theorem 3.1, we derive
|Sv0 | + 2md ≤ q. By taking |Sv0 | ≥ mq/g according to Proposition 4.1, the proof is finished.
15
4.1
Construction and Analysis of AKCN
Algorithm 4 AKCN: Asymmetric KC with Noise
1: params = (q, m, g, d, aux), where aux = ∅.
2: procedure Con(σ1 , k1 , params)
3:
v = bg (σ1 + bk1 q/me) /qe mod g
4:
return v
5: end procedure
6: procedure Rec(σ2 , v, params)
7:
k2 = bm(v/g − σ2 /q)e mod m
8:
return k2
9: end procedure
. σ1 ∈ [0, q − 1]
. σ2 ∈ [0, q − 1]
The AKC scheme, referred to as asymmetric KC with noise (AKCN), is depicted in Algorithm 4.
We note that, in some sense, AKCN could be viewed as the generalization and optimization of the
consensus mechanism proposed in [LPR13a] for CPA-secure public-key encryption. For AKCN,
we can offline compute and store k1 and gbk1 q/me in order to accelerate online performance.
4.1.1
Correctness and Security of AKCN
Theorem 4.2. Suppose the parameters of AKCN satisfy (2d + 1)m < q 1 −
AKCN scheme described in Algorithm 4 is correct.
m
g
. Then, the
Proof. From the formula generating v, we know that there exist 1 , 2 ∈ R and θ ∈ Z, where
|1 | ≤ 1/2 and |2 | ≤ 1/2, such that
k1 q
g
σ1 +
+ 1
+ 2 + θg
v=
q
m
Taking this into the formula computing k2 in Rec, we have
k2 = bm(v/g − σ2 /q)e mod m
1
2
σ2
= m
(σ1 + k1 q/m + 1 ) +
+θ−
mod m
q
g
q
m
m
m
= k1 + (σ1 − σ2 ) + 1 + 2 mod m
q
q
g
By Fact 3.1 (page 11), there exist θ0 ∈ Z and δ ∈ [−d, d] such that σ1 = σ2 + θ0 q + δ. Hence,
m
m
m
k2 = k1 + δ + 1 + 2 mod m
q
q
g
Since |mδ/q + m1 /q + m2 /g| ≤ md/q + m/2q + m/2g < 1/2, k1 = k2 .
Theorem 4.3. The AKCN scheme is secure. Specifically, v is independent of k1 when σ1 ← Zq .
Proof. For arbitrary ṽ ∈ Zg and arbitrary k̃1 , k̃10 ∈ Zm , we prove that Pr[v = ṽ|k1 = k̃1 ] = Pr[v =
ṽ|k1 = k̃10 ] when σ1 ← Zq .
16
For any (k̃, ṽ) in Zm × Zg , the event (v = ṽ | k1 = k̃) is equivalent to the event that
there exists σ1 ∈ Zq such that ṽ = bg(σ1 + bk̃q/me)/qe mod g. Note that σ1 ∈ Zq satisfies
ṽ = bg(σ1 + bk̃q/me)/qe mod g, if and only if there exist ∈ (−1/2, 1/2] and θ ∈ Z such that
ṽ = g(σ1 +bk̃q/me)/q+−θg. That is, σ1 = (q(ṽ−)/g−bk̃q/me) mod q, for some ∈ (−1/2, 1/2].
Let Σ(ṽ, k̃) = {σ1 ∈ Zq | ∃ ∈ (−1/2, 1/2] s.t.
σ1 = (q(ṽ − )/g
− bk̃q/me) mod q}. Defining the
map φ : Σ(ṽ, 0) → Σ(ṽ, k̃), by setting φ(x) = x − bk̃q/me mod q. Then φ is obviously a oneto-one map. Hence, the cardinality of Σ(ṽ, k̃) is irrelevant to k̃. Specifically, for arbitrary ṽ ∈ Zg
and arbitrary k̃1 , k̃10 ∈ Zm , it holds that Σ(ṽ, k̃1 ) = Σ(ṽ, k̃10 ) = |Σ(ṽ, 0)|
Now,h for arbitrary ṽ ∈ Zg iand arbitrary k̃ ∈ Zm , when σ1 ← Zq we have that Pr[v = ṽ | k1 =
k̃] = Pr σ1 ∈ Σ(ṽ, k̃) | k1 = k̃ = |Σ(ṽ, k̃)|/q = |Σ(ṽ, 0)|/q. The right-hand side only depends on
ṽ, and so v is independent of k1 .
4.1.2
A Simplified Variant of AKCN for Special Parameters
We consider the parameters q = g = 2q̄ , m = 2m̄ for positive integers q̄, m̄. Then the two rounding
operations in line 3 of Con (in Algorithm 4) can be directly eliminated, since only integers are
involved in the computation. We have the following variant described in Algorithm 5. Note
that, in Algorithm 5, the modular and multiplication/division operations can be implemented by
simple bitwise operations.
Algorithm 5 AKCN power 2
1: params : q = g = 2q̄ , m = 2m̄ , aux = {G = q/m}
2: procedure Con(σ1 , k1 , params)
3:
v = (σ1 + k1 · G) mod q, where k1 · G can be offline computed
4:
return v
5: end procedure
6: procedure Rec(σ2 , v, params)
7:
k2 = b(v − σ2 )/Ge mod m
8:
return k2
9: end procedure
For the protocol variant presented in Algorithm 5, its correctness and security can be proved
with a relaxed constraint on the parameters of (q, d, m), as shown in the following corollary.
Corollary 4.1. If q and m are power of 2, and d, m and q satisfy 2md < q, then the AKCN
scheme described in Algorithm 5 is correct and secure.
Proof. For correctness, suppose |σ1 − σ2 |q ≤ d, then there exit δ ∈ [−d, d] and θ ∈ Z such that
σ2 = σ1 +θq+δ. From the formula calculating v, there exists θ0 ∈ Z such that v = σ1 +k1 2q̄−m̄ +θ0 q.
Taking these into the formula computing k2 , line 7 of Rec in Algorithm 5, we have
k2 = b(v − σ1 − δ − θq) /2q̄−m̄ e mod m
= b(k1 2q̄−m̄ − δ)/2q̄−m̄ e mod m
= k1 − bδ/2q̄−m̄ e mod m
If 2md < q, then |δ/2q̄−m̄ | < 1/2, so that k1 = k2 .
For security, as a special case of the generic AKCN scheme in Algorithm 4, the security of the
AKCN scheme in Algorithm 5 directly follows from that of Algorithm 4.
17
4.2
On KC/AKC vs. Fuzzy Extractor
Our formulations of KC and AKC are abstractions of the core ingredients of previous constructions
of KE and PKE from LWE/RLWE. As we shall see in the subsequent sections, the design and
analysis of KE and PKE from LWE, LWR and RLWE can be reduced to KC and AKC. We also
note that KC and AKC are similar to fuzzy extractor proposed in [DORS08], which extracts
shared-keys from biometrics and noisy data. In this section, we make some discussions on the
relationship between KC/AKC and fuzzy extractor.
The differences between the definitions of KC/AKC and that of fuzzy extractor lie mainly in
the following ways. Firstly, AKC was not considered within the definitional framework of fuzzy
extractor. Secondly, the metric | · |q we use in defining KC and AKC was not considered for fuzzy
extractor. Thirdly, in the definitions of KC and AKC, the algorithm Rec (corresponding Rep for
fuzzy extractor) is mandated to be deterministic, while in the formulation of fuzzy extractor it
is probabilistic. Fourthly, in the formulation of fuzzy extractor [DORS08], w, R and P (corresponding σ1 , k and v in KC/AKC) are binary strings; while in the definitions of KC/AKC, the
corresponding values σ1 ∈ Zq , k ∈ Zm and v ∈ Zg have more structured ranges, which are helpful
in deriving the exact upper bound. Finally, for the security of KC and AKC, we require that the
signal value v be independent of the shared-key k1 (that can be subject to arbitrary distribution
for AKC); roughly speaking, in the definition of fuzzy extractor [DORS08], it is required that the
joint distribution (R, P ) be statistically close to (Ul , P ) where R ∈ {0, 1}l and Ul is the uniform
distribution over {0, 1}l .
A generic upper bound on the length of key extracted by fuzzy extractor is proposed in
[DORS08, Appendix C]. In comparison, the upper bounds for KC and AKC proved in this work
are more versatile and precise w.r.t. the metric | · |q . For example, the effect of the length of
the signal v, i.e., the bandwidth parameter g, is not considered in the upper bound for fuzzy
extractor, but is taken into account in the upper bounds for KC and AKC.
A generic construction of fuzzy extractor from secure sketch, together with a generic construction of secure sketch for transitive metric spaces, is proposed in [DORS08]. We note that
(Zq , | · |q ) can be naturally seen as a transitive matric space. Compared to the secure sketch based
generic constructions of fuzzy extractor, our constructions of KC and AKC are direct and more
efficient.
In spite of some similarities between KC/AKC and fuzzy extractors, we remark that before
our this work the relation between fuzzy extractor and KE from LWR and its variants is actually opaque. Explicitly identifying and formalizing KC/AKC and reducing lattice-based KE to
KC/AKC in a black-box modular way, with inherent bounds on what could or couldn’t be done,
cut the complexity of future design and analysis of these cryptosystems.
5
LWR-Based Key Exchange from KC and AKC
In this section, we present the applications of OKCN and AKCN to key exchange protocols based
on LWR. The LWR-based key exchange (KE) is depicted in Figure 3. Denote by (n, lA , lB , q, p, KC, χ)
the system parameters, where p|q, and p and q are chosen to be power of 2. Let KC = (params =
(p, m, g, d, aux), Con, Rec) be a correct and secure key consensus scheme, χ be a small noise distribution over Zq , and Gen be a pseudo-random generator (PRG) generating the matrix A from
a small seed. For presentation simplicity, we assume A ∈ Zn×n
to be square matrix. The length
q
of the random seed, i.e., κ, is typically set to be 256.
18
Initiator
seed ← {0, 1}κ
A = Gen(seed) ∈ Zn×n
q
X1 ← χn×lA
Y1 = ⌊AX1 ⌉p
Responder
A
seed, Y1 ∈ Zn×l
p
A = Gen(seed)
X2 ← χn×lB
Y2 = ⌊AT X2 ⌉p
ϵ ← [−q/2p, q/2p − 1]n×lA
Σ2 = Y1T X2 + ⌊ϵT X2 ⌉p
(K2 , V) ← Con(Σ2 , params)
B
Y2 ∈ Zn×l
, V ∈ ZlgA ×lB
p
Σ1 = XT1 Y2
K1 ← Rec(Σ1 , V, params)
lA ×lB and |K | =
Figure 3: LWR-based key exchange from KC and AKC, where K1 , K2 ∈ Zm
1
|K2 | = lA lB |m|.
The actual session-key is derived from K1 and K2 via some key derivation function KDF .
For presentation simplicity, the functions Con and Rec are applied to matrices, meaning that they
are applied to each of the coordinates respectively. We shall see that the corresponding elements
of Σ1 and Σ2 are close to each other. Then Con and Rec are applied to them to reach consensus
bits K1 and K2 .
For presentation simplicity, we describe the LWR-based key exchange protocol from a KC
scheme. But it can be trivially adapted to work on any correct and secure AKC scheme. In this
case, the responder user Bob simply chooses K2 ← ZlmA ×lB , and the output of Con(Σ2 , K2 , params)
is simply defined to be V. For presentation simplicity, in the following security definition and
analysis we also simply assume that the output of the PRG Gen is truly random (which is simply
assumed to be a random oracle in [ADPS16]).
5.1
Correctness Analysis
In this subsection, we analyze the correctness (specifically, the error probability) of the LWRbased KE protocol. For any integer x, let {x}p denote x − pq bxep , where bxep = b pq xe. Then, for
any integer x, {x}p ∈ [−q/2p, q/2p − 1], hence {x}p can be naturally regarded as an element in
Zq/p . In fact, {x}p is equal to x mod q/p, where the result is represented in [−q/2p, q/2p − 1].
When the notation {·}p is applied to a matrix, it means {·}p applies to every element of the
matrix respectively.
We have Σ2 = Y1T X2 +bT X2 ep = bAX1 eTp X2 +bT X2 ep = pq (AX1 −{AX1 }p )T X2 +bT X2 ep .
And Σ1 = XT1 Y2 = XT1 bAT X2 ep = pq (XT1 AT X2 − XT1 {AT X2 }p ). Hence,
Σ2 − Σ1 =
p T
(X {AT X2 }p − {AX1 }Tp X2 ) + bT X2 ep
q 1
19
mod p
p T
T
T
T
=
(X {A X2 }p − {AX1 }p X2 + X2 )
q 1
mod p
The general idea is that X1 , X2 , , {AT X2 }p and {AX1 }p are small enough, so that Σ1 and
Σ2 are close. If |Σ1 − Σ2 |p ≤ d, the correctness of the underlying KC guarantees K1 = K2 . For
given concrete parameters, we numerically derive the probability of |Σ2 −Σ1 |p > d by numerically
calculating the distribution of XT1 {AT X2 }p − ({AX1 }Tp X2 − T X2 ) for the case of lA = lB = 1,
then applying the union bound. The independency between variables indicated by the following
Theorem 5.1 can greatly simplify the calculation.
Let Inv(X1 , X2 ) denote the event that there exist invertible elements of ring Zq/p in both
vectors X1 and X2 . Inv(X1 , X2 ) happens with overwhelming probability in our application.
Lemma 5.1. Consider the case of lA = lB = 1. For any a ∈ Zq/p , x ∈ Znq/p , denote Sx,a =
{y ∈ Znq/p | xT y mod (q/p) = a}. For any fixed a ∈ Zq/p , conditioned on Inv(X1 , X2 ) and
XT1 AT X2 mod (q/p) = a, the random vectors {AT X2 }p and {AX1 }p are independent, and are
subjected to uniform distribution over SX1 ,a , SX2 ,a respectively.
Proof. Under the condition of Inv(X1 , X2 ), for any fixed X1 and X2 , define the map φX1 ,X2 :
Zn×n
→ Znq/p × Znq/p , such that A 7→ ({AX1 }p , {AT X2 }p ).
q
We shall prove that the image of φX1 ,X2 is S = {(y1 , y2 ) ∈ Znq/p × Znq/p | XT2 y1 = XT1 y2
T and y = (y , y0T )T . Without loss of generality, we
mod (q/p)}. Denote X1 = (x1 , X0T
2
2
1 )
2
assume x1 is invertible in the ring Zq/p . For any (y1 , y2 ) ∈ S, we need to find an A such that
φX1 ,X2 (A) = (y1 , y2 ).
From the condition Inv(X1 , X2 ), we know that there exists an A0 ∈ Z(n−1)×n such that
0T 0
0T
0
{A X2 }p = y20 . Then, we let a1 = x−1
1 (y1 − A X1 ) mod (q/p), and A = (a1 , A ). Now we
check that φX1 ,X2 (A) = (y1 , y2 ).
x1
0T
= {x1 a1 + A0T X01 }p = y1
{AX1 }p = a1 A
x01
p
−1 T
T
T
a1
a1 X2
A)X2
x1 (y1 − X0T
T
1
=
{A X2 }p =
X2
=
A0 X2
A0
A0 X2
p
p
p
−1 T
0T
0
y2
x1 (X1 y2 − X1 y2 )
=
= y2
=
0
y
y20
2
p
p
Hence, if we treat Zn×n
and S as Z-modules, then φX1 ,X2 : Zqn×n → S is a surjective homoq
morphism. Then, for any fixed (X1 , X2 ), ({AX1 }p , {AT X2 }p ) is uniformly distributed over S.
This completes the proof.
Theorem 5.1. Under the condition Inv(X1 , X2 ), the following two distributions are identical:
• (a, X1 , X2 , {AX1 }p , {AT X2 }p ), where A ← Zqn×n , X1 ← χn , X2 ← χn , and a = XT1 AT X2 mod
(q/p).
• (a, X1 , X2 , y1 , y2 ), where a ← Zq/p , X1 ← χn , X2 ← χn , y1 ← SX2 ,a , and y2 ← SX1 ,a .
Proof. For any ã ∈ Zq/p , X̃1 , X̃2 ∈ Supp(χn ), ỹ1 , ỹ2 ∈ Znq/p , we have
Pr[a = ã, X1 = X̃1 , X2 = X̃2 , {AX1 }p = ỹ1 , {AT X2 }p = ỹ2 | Inv(X1 , X2 )]
= Pr[{AX1 }p = ỹ1 , {AT X2 }p = ỹ2 | a = ã, X1 = X̃1 , X2 = X̃2 , Inv(X1 , X2 )]
Pr[a = ã, X1 = X̃1 , X2 = X̃2 | Inv(X1 , X2 )]
20
From Lemma 5.1, the first term equals to Pr[y1 ← SX̃2 ,ã ; y2 ← SX̃1 ,ã : y1 = ỹ1 , y2 = ỹ2 | a =
ã, X1 = X̃1 , X2 = X̃2 , Inv(X1 , X2 )].
For the second term, we shall prove that a is independent of (X1 , X2 ), and is uniformly
distributed over Zq/p . Under the condition of Inv(X1 , X2 ), the map Zn×n
→ Zq/p , such that
q
T
T
A 7→ X1 A X2 mod (q/p), is a surjective homomorphism between the two Z-modules. Then,
Pr[a = ã | X1 = X̃1 , X2 = X̃2 , Inv(X1 , X2 )] = p/q. Hence, under the condition of Inv(X1 , X2 ), a
is independent of (X1 , X2 ), and is distributed uniformly at random. So the two ways of sampling
result in the same distribution.
We design and implement the following algorithm to numerically calculate the distribution
of Σ2 − Σ1 efficiently. For any c1 , c2 ∈ Zq , a ∈ Zq/p , we numerically calculate Pr[XT1 {AT X2 }p =
c1 ] and Pr[{AX1 }Tp X2 − T X2 = c2 , XT1 AT X2 mod (q/p) = a], then derive the distribution of
Σ2 − Σ1 .
As Inv(X1 , X2 ) occurs with overwhelming probability, for any event E, we have | Pr[E] −
Pr[E|Inv(X1 , X2 )]| < negl. For simplicity, we ignore the effect of Inv(X1 , X2 ) in the following
calculations.
By Theorem 5.1, Pr[XT1 {AT X2 }p = c1 ] = Pr[X1 ← χn , y2 ← Znq/p ; XT1 y2 =
c1 ]. This probability can be numerically calculated by computer programs. The probability
Pr[{AX1 }Tp X2 − T X2 = c2 , XT1 AT X2 mod (q/p) = a] can also be calculated by the similar way.
Then, for arbitrary c ∈ Zq ,
=
Pr[Σ1 − Σ2 = c] = Pr[XT1 {AT X2 }p − {AX1 }Tp X2 + T X2 = c]
X Pr[XT {AT X2 }p =c1 ,{AX1 }T X2 −T X2 =c2 |XT AT X2 mod (q/p)=a]·
p
1
c1 −c2 =c
a∈Zq/p
X
=
c1 −c2 =c
a∈Zq/p
X
=
T
T T
Pr[XT
1 {A X2 }p =c1 |X1 A X2 mod (q/p)=a]·
T
T
T
T
T
Pr[{AX1 }p X2 − X2 =c2 |X1 A X2 mod (q/p)=a] Pr[XT
1 A X2
mod (q/p)=a]
Pr[XT1 {AT X2 }p = c1 , c1 mod (q/p) = a] Pr[{AX1 }Tp X2 − T X2 = c2 , XT1 AT X2 mod (q/p) = a]
Pr[XT1 AT X2 mod (q/p) = a]
a∈Zq/p
c1 −c2 =c
X
=
1
T
Pr[XT
1 A X2 mod (q/p)=a]
Pr[XT1 {AT X2 }p = c1 ] Pr[{AX1 }Tp X2 − T X2 = c2 , XT1 AT X2 mod (q/p) = a]
a∈Zq/p
c1 −c2 =c
c1 mod (q/p)=a
Pr[XT1 AT X2 mod (q/p) = a]
By Theorem 5.1, conditioned on Inv(X1 , X2 ) and XT1 AT X2 mod (q/p) = a, XT1 {AT X2 }p is
independent of {AX1 }Tp X2 − T X2 , which implies the second equality. Our code and scripts are
available from Github http://github.com/OKCN.
5.2
Security Proof
Definition 5.1. A KC or AKC based key exchange protocol from LWR is secure, if for any
sufficiently large security parameter λ and any PPT adversary A, Pr[b0 = b] − 21 is negligible,
as defined w.r.t. game G0 specified in Algorithm 22.4
For presentation simplicity, we simply assume K02 ← ZlmA ×lB when the key exchange protocol is implemented
with AKC. However, when the AKC-based protocol is interpreted as a public-key encryption scheme, K02 and K12
correspond to the plaintexts, which are taken independently at random from the same (arbitrary) distribution over
ZlmA ×lB .
4
21
Algorithm 6 Game G0
1: A ← Zn×n
q
2: X1 ← χn×lA
3: Y1 = bAX1 ep
4: X2 ← χn×lB
5: ← {−q/2p . . . q/2p − 1}n×lA
6: Y2 = bAT X2 ep
q
7: Σ2 = b( p Y1 + )T X2 ep
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , Y2 , Kb2 , V)
. Σ2 = Y1T X2 + bT X2 ep = b( pq Y1 + )T X2 ep
Before starting to prove the security, we first recall some basic properties of the LWR assumption. The following lemma is derived by a hybrid argument, similar to that of LWE
[PVW08, BCD+ 16].
Lemma 5.2 (LWR problem in the matrix form). For positive integer parameters (λ, n, q ≥ 2, l, t),
where n, q, l, t all are polynomial in λ satisfying p|q, and a distribution χ over Zq , denote by
(l,t)
n×l and outputting
Lχ the distribution over Zt×n
× Zt×l
generated by taking A ← Zt×n
q
p
q ,S ← χ
(A, bASep ). Then, under the assumption on indistinguishability between Aq,s,χ (with s ← χn )
and U(Znq × Zp ) within t samples, no PPT distinguisher D can distinguish, with non-negligible
(l,t)
probability, between the distribution Lχ
and U(Zt×n
× Zt×l
q
p ) for sufficiently large λ.
Theorem 5.2. If (params, Con, Rec) is a correct and secure KC or AKC scheme, the key exchange
protocol described in Figure 3 is secure under the (matrix form of ) LWR assumption.
Proof. The proof is analogous to that in [Pei14, BCD+ 16]. The general idea is that we construct
a sequence of games: G0 , G1 and G2 , where G0 is the original game for defining security. In every
move from game Gi to Gi+1 , 0 ≤ i ≤ 1, we change a little. All games Gi ’s share the same PPT
adversary A, whose goal is to distinguish between the matrices chosen uniformly at random and
the matrices generated in the actual key exchange protocol. Denote by Ti , 0 ≤ i ≤ 2, the event
that b = b0 in Game Gi . Our goal is to prove that Pr[T0 ] < 1/2 + negl, where negl is a negligible
function in λ. For ease of readability, we re-produce game G0 below. For presentation simplicity,
in the subsequent analysis, we always assume the underlying KC or AKC is correct. The proof
can be trivially extended to the case that correctness holds with overwhelming probability (i.e.,
failure occurs with negligible probability).
22
Algorithm 8 Game G1
1: A ← Zqn×n
2: X1 ← χn×lA
A
3: Y1 ← Zn×l
p
n×l
B
4: X2 ← χ
5: ← {−q/2p . . . q/2p − 1}n×lA
6: Y2 = bAT X2 ep
q
7: Σ2 = b( p Y1 + )T X2 ep
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , Y2 , Kb2 , V)
Algorithm 7 Game G0
1: A ← Zn×n
q
2: X1 ← χn×lA
3: Y1 = bAX1 ep
4: X2 ← χn×lB
5: ← {−q/2p . . . q/2p − 1}n×lA
6: Y2 = bAT X2 ep
q
7: Σ2 = b( p Y1 + )T X2 ep
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , Y2 , Kb2 , V)
(l ,n)
and U(Zqn×n ×
(l ,n)
from U(Zn×n
×
q
Lemma 5.3. | Pr[T0 ]−Pr[T1 ]| < negl, under the indistinguishability between Lχ A
A ).
Zn×l
p
Proof. Construct a distinguisher D, in Algorithm 25, who tries to distinguish Lχ A
A ).
Zn×l
p
Algorithm 9 Distinguisher D
1: procedure D(A, B)
2:
Y1 = B
3:
X2 ← χn×lB
4:
← {−q/2p . . . q/2p − 1}n×lA
5:
Y2 = bAT X2 ep
6:
Σ2 = b( pq Y1 + )T X2 ep
7:
K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
8:
K12 ← Zm
9:
b ← {0, 1}
10:
b0 ← A(A, Y1 , Y2 , Kb2 , V)
11:
if b0 = b then
12:
return 1
13:
else
14:
return 0
15:
end if
16: end procedure
(l ,n)
If (A, B) is subjected to Lχ A
A
. A ∈ Zn×n
, B ∈ Zn×l
p
q
h
i
(l ,n)
, then D perfectly simulates G0 . Hence, Pr D Lχ A
=1 =
Pr[T0 ]. On the other hand, if (A, B) is chosen uniformly at random from Zqn×n × Zpn×lA , which
is denoted as (AU , BU ), then D perfectly simulates G1 . So Pr[D(AU , BU ) = 1] = Pr[T1 ]. Hence,
(l ,n)
|Pr[T0 ] − Pr[T1 ]| = Pr[D(Lχ A ) = 1] − Pr[D(AU , BU ) = 1] < negl.
23
Algorithm 10 Game G1
1: A ← Zn×n
q
2: X1 , E1 ← χn×lA
A
3: Y1 ← Zn×l
q
n×l
B
4: X2 ← χ
5: ← {−q/2p . . . q/2p − 1}n×lA
6: Y2 = bAT X2 ep
q
7: Σ2 = b( p Y1 + )T X2 ep
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , Y2 , Kb2 , V)
Algorithm 11 Game G2
1: A ← Zqn×n
2: X1 , E1 ← χn×lA
A
3: Y1 ← Zn×l
q
n×l
B
4: X2 ← χ
5: ← {−q/2p . . . q/2p − 1}n×lA
B
6: Y2 ← Zn×l
p
7: Σ2 ← ZlpA ×lB
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , Y2 , Kb2 , V)
(l ,n+lA )
Lemma 5.4. | Pr[T1 ] − Pr[T2 ]| < negl, under the indistinguishability between Lχ B
(n+l )×n
(n+l )×l
U(Zq A
× Zp A B ).
and
Proof. As Y1 and are subjected to uniform distribution in G1 , pq Y1 + is subjected to uniform
A . Based on this observation, we construct the following distinguisher D 0 .
distribution over Zn×l
q
A ), where
First observe that Y10 = ( pq Y1 + ) ∈ Zqn×lA follows the uniform distribution U(Zn×l
q
(l ,n+l )
(n+l )×n
A
A and ← [−q/2p, q/2p − 1]n×lA . If (A0 , B) is subject to L B
Y1 ← Zn×l
, A0 ← Zq A
χ
q
corresponds to A ← Zn×n
and Y10 = pq Y1 + in G1 ; And S ← χn×lB in generating (A0 , B)
q
corresponds to X2 ← χn×lB in G1 . In this case, we re-write
T
A
0
B = bA Sep =
X2
Y10T
p
bAT X2 ep
Y2
=
=
bY10T X2 ep
Σ2
i
h
(l ,n+lA )
= 1 = Pr[T1 ].
Hence Pr D0 Lχ B
(n+l )×n
(n+l )×l
On the other hand, if (A0 , B) is subject to uniform distribution U(Zq A
× Zp A B ),
0
0
then A, Y1 , Y2 , Σ2 all are also uniformly random; So, the view of D in this case is the same
as that in game G2 . Hence, Pr [D0 (A0 , B) = 1] = Pr[T2 ] in this case. Then, | Pr[T1 ] − Pr[T2 ]| =
(l ,n+lA )
(n+l )×n
(n+l )×l
| Pr[D0 (Lχ B
) = 1] − Pr[D0 (U(Zq A
× Zp A B )) = 1]| < negl.
24
Algorithm 12 Distinguisher D0
(n+lA )×n
0
procedure D0 (A0 , B) where
A ∈ Zq
T
A
Denote A0 =
Y10T
Y2
Denote B =
Σ2
K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
K12 ← Zm
b ← {0, 1}
b0 ← A(A, bY10 ep , Y2 , Kb2 , V)
if b0 = b then
return 1
else
return 0
end if
end procedure
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
(n+lA )×lB
, B ∈ Zp
. A ∈ Zn×n
, Y10T = ( pq Y1 + )T ∈ ZlqA ×n
q
B , Σ ∈ ZlA ×lB
. Y2 ∈ Zn×l
2
p
p
Lemma 5.5. If the underlying KC or AKC is secure, Pr[T 2] = 21 .
Proof. Note that, in Game G2 , for any 1 ≤ i ≤ lA and 1 ≤ j ≤ lB , K02 [i, j], V[i, j] only depends
on Σ2 [i, j], and Σ2 is subject to uniform distribution. By the security of KC, we have that, for
each pair (i, j), K02 [i, j] and V[i, j] are independent, and K02 [i, j] is uniform distributed. Hence,
K02 and V are independent, and K02 is uniformly distributed, which implies that Pr[T2 ] = 1/2.
This finishes the proof of Theorem C.1.
5.3
Parameter Selection and Evaluation
In this subsection, the concrete parameters for key exchange protocol from LWR are evaluated
and chosen.
5.3.1
Discrete Distribution
It is suggested in [ADPS16, BCD+ 16] that rounded Gaussian distribution can be replaced by
discrete distribution that is very close to rounded Gaussian in the sense of Rényi divergence
[BLL+ 15].
Definition 5.2 ( [BLL+ 15]). For two discrete distributions P, Q satisfying Supp(P ) ⊆ Supp(Q),
their a-order Rényi divergence, for some a > 1, is
Ra (P ||Q) =
X
x∈Supp(P )
P (x)a
Q(x)a−1
1
a−1
.
Lemma 5.6 ( [BLL+ 15]). Letting a > 1, P and Q are two discrete distributions satisfying
Supp(P ) ⊆ Supp(Q), then we have
25
Multiplicativity: Let P and Q be two distributions of random variable (Y1 , Y2 ). For i ∈ {1, 2},
let Pi and Qi be the margin distribution of Yi over P and Q respectively. If Y1 and Y2 ,
under P and Q respectively, are independent, then
Ra (P ||Q) = Ra (P1 ||Q1 ) · Ra (P2 ||Q2 ).
Probability Preservation: Let A ⊆ Supp(Q) be an event, then
a
Q(A) ≥ P (A) a−1 /Ra (P ||Q).
Note that, when the underlying key derivation function KDF is modelled as a random oracle
(as in [BCD+ 16, ADPS16]), an attacker is considered to be successful only if it can recover
the entire consensus bits. Denote by E the event that a PPT attacker can successfully and
entirely recover the bits of K1 = K2 . By Lemma 5.6, we have that Prrounded Gaussian [E] >
n·(l +l )+l ·l
Prdiscrete [E]a/(a−1) /Ra A B A B (χ||φ̄), where φ̄ is the rounded Gaussian distribution, and χ is
the discrete distribution.
5.3.2
Proposed Parameters
dist.
bits
var.
DR
DP
16
16
1.70
1.40
0
19572
21456
probability of
±1
±2
±3
14792 6383 1570
15326 5580 1033
±4
220
97
±5
17
4
order
divergence
500.0
500.0
1.0000396
1.0000277
Table 1: Discrete distributions of every component in the LWR secret. We choose the standard
variances large enough to prevent potential combinational attacks.
Recommended
Paranoid
n
680
832
q
215
215
p
212
212
l
8
8
m
24
24
g
28
28
distr.
DR
DP
bw.
16.39
20.03
err.
2−35
2−34
|K|
256
256
Table 2: Parameters for LWR-Based key exchange. “bw.” refers to the bandwidth in kilo-bytes.
“err.” refers to the overall error probability that is calculated by the algorithm developed in
Section 5.1. “|K|” refers to the length of consensus bits.
5.3.3
Security Estimation
Similar to [ADPS16, BCD+ 16, CKLS16], we only consider the primal and dual attacks [CN11,
SE94] adapted to the LWR problem.
The dual attack tries to distinguish the distribution of LWE samples and the uniform distribution. Suppose (A, b = As + e) ∈ Zm×n
× Zm
q
q is a LWE sample, where s and e are
2
2
drawn from discrete Gaussian of variance σs and σe respectively. Then we choose a positive real
c ∈ R, 0 < c ≤ q, and construct Lc (A) = (x, y/c) ∈ Zm × (Z/c)n | xT A = yT mod q , which
is a lattice with dimension m + n and determinant (q/c)n . For a short vector (x, y) ∈ Lc (A)
found by the BKZ algorithm, we have xT b = xT (As + e) = c · yT s + xT e mod q. If (A, b)
is an LWE sample, the distribution of the right-hand side will be very close to a Gaussian of
26
p
standard deviation c2 kyk2 σs2 + kxk2 σe2 , otherwise the distribution will be uniform. k(x, y)k
n
is aboutqδ0m+n (q/c) m+n , where δ0 is
q the root Hermite factor. We heuristically assume that
kxk =
m
m+n
k(x, y)k, and kyk =
n
m+n
k(x, y)k. Then we can choose c = σe /σs that min-
T
imizes the standard deviation of xT b. The
padvantage of distinguishing x b from uniform distri2
2
2
2
2
2
2
bution is = 4 exp(−2π τ ), where τ = c kyk σs + kxk σe /q. This attack must be repeated
R = max{1, 1/(20.2075b 2 )} times to be successful.
The primal attack reduces the LWE problem to the unique-SVP problem. Let Λw (A) =
{(x, y, z) ∈ Zn × (Zm /w) × Z | Ax + wy = zb mod q}, and a vector v = (s, e/w, 1) ∈ Λw (A).
Λw (A) is a lattice of d = m + n + 1 dimensions, and its determinant is (q/w)m . From geometry
series assumption, we can derive kb∗i k ≈ δ0d−2i−1 det(Λw (A))1/d . We heuristically assume that
the lengthqof projection of v onto
q the vector space spanned by the last b Gram-Schmidt vectors
(nσs2 + mσe2 /w2 + 1). If this length is shorter than kb∗d−b k,
q
b
2
2
2
this attack can be successful. Hence, the successful condition is
d (nσs + mσe /w + 1) ≤
m/d
δ02b−d−1 wq
. We know that the optimal w balancing the secret s and the noise e is about
σe /σs .
We aim at providing parameter sets for long term security, and estimate the concrete security
in a more conservative way than [APS15] from the defender’s point of view. We first consider
the attacks of LWE whose secret and noise have different variances. Then, we treat the LWR
problem as a special LWE problem whose noise is uniformly distributed over [−q/2p, q/2p − 1]. In
our security estimation, we simply ignore the difference between the discrete distribution and the
rounded Gaussian, on the following grounds: the dual attack and the primal attack only concern
about the standard deviation, and the Rényi divergence between the two distributions is very
small.
is about
b
d
k(s, e/w, 1)k ≈
b
d
Scheme
Recommended
Paranoid
Attack
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
m0
667
631
768
746
b
461
458
584
580
C
143
142
180
179
Q
131
130
164
163
P
104
103
130
129
Table 3: Security estimation of the parameters described in Table 2. “C, Q, P” stand for “Classical, Quantum, Plausible” respectively. Numbers under these columns are the binary logarithm
of running time of the corresponding attacks. Numbers under “m0 , b” are the best parameters for
the attacks.
6
LWE-Based Key Exchange from KC and AKC
In this section, following the protocol structure in [Pei14,ADPS16,BCD+ 16], we present the applications of OKCN and AKCN to key exchange protocols based on LWE. Denote by (λ, n, q, χ, KC, lA , lB , t)
the underlying parameters, where λ is the security parameter, q ≥ 2, n, lA and lB are positive
integers that are polynomial in λ (for protocol symmetry, lA and lB are usually set to be equal
and are actually small constant). To save bandwidth, we cut off t least significant bits of Y2
before sending it to Alice.
Let KC = (params, Con, Rec) be a correct and secure KC scheme, where params is set to be
(q, g, m, d). The KC-based key exchange protocol from LWE is depicted in Figure 4, and the
27
Initiator
seed ← {0, 1}κ
A = Gen(seed) ∈ Zn×n
q
X1 , E1 ← χn×lA
Y1 = AX1 + E1
Responder
A
seed, Y1 ∈ Zn×l
q
A = Gen(seed)
X2 , E2 ← χn×lB
Y2 = AT X2 + E2
Eσ ← χlA ×lB
Σ2 = Y1T X2 + Eσ
(K2 , V) ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
B
Y2′ = ⌊Y2 /2t ⌋ ∈ Zn×l
⌈q/2t ⌉ , V ∈ Zg
Σ1 = XT1 (2t Y2′ + 2t−1 1)
K1 ← Rec(Σ1 , V, params)
Figure 4: LWE-based key exchange from KC and AKC, where K1 , K2 ∈ ZlmA ×lB and |K1 | =
|K2 | = lA lB |m|. 1 refers to the matrix which every elements are 1.
actual session-key is derived from K1 and K2 via some key derivation function KDF . There,
for presentation simplicity, the Con and Rec functions are applied to matrices, meaning they are
applied to each of the coordinates separately. Note that 2t Y20 + 2t−1 1 is an approximation of Y2 ,
so we have Σ1 ≈ XT1 Y2 = XT1 AT X2 +XT1 E2 , Σ2 = Y1T X2 +Eσ = XT1 AT X2 +ET1 X2 +Eσ . As we
choose X1 , X2 , E1 , E2 , Eσ according to a small noise distribution χ, the main part of Σ1 and that
of Σ2 are the same XT1 AT X2 . Hence, the corresponding coordinates of Σ1 and Σ2 are close in
the sense of | · |q , from which some key consensus can be reached. The failure probability depends
upon the number of bits we cut t, the underlying distribution χ and the distance parameter d,
which will be analyzed in detail in subsequent sections. In the following security definition and
analysis, we simply assume that the output of the PRG Gen is truly random. For presentation
simplicity, we have described the LWE-based key exchange protocol from a KC scheme. But it
can be straightforwardly adapted to work on any correct and secure AKC scheme, as clarified in
Section 5.
By a straightforward adaption (actually simplification) of the security proof of LWR-based key
exchange protocol in Section 5.2, we have the following theorem. The detailed proof of Theorem
6.1 is presented in Appendix C.
Theorem 6.1. If (params, Con, Rec) is a correct and secure KC or AKC scheme, the key exchange
protocol described in Figure 4 is secure under the (matrix form of ) LWE assumption [PVW08,
BCD+ 16].
The correctness of the protocol depends upon the underlying error distributions, which are
discussed in the next subsection.
28
6.1
Noise Distributions and Correctness
For a correct KC with parameter d, if the distance of corresponding elements of Σ1 and Σ2
is less than d in the sense of | · |q , then the scheme depicted in Figure 4 is correct. Denote
(Y2 ) = 2t bY2 /2t c + 2t−1 1 − Y2 . Then
Σ1 − Σ2 = XT1 (2t Y20 + 2t−1 1) − Y1T X2 − Eσ
= XT1 (Y2 + (Y2 )) − Y1T X2 − Eσ
= XT1 (AT X2 + E2 + (Y2 )) − (AX1 + E1 )T X2 − Eσ
= XT1 (E2 + (Y2 )) − ET1 X2 − Eσ
We consider each pair of elements in matrix Σ1 , Σ2 separately, then derive the overall error
rate by union bound. Now, we only need to consider the case lA = lB = 1. In this case,
Xi , Ei , Yi , (i = 1, 2) are column vectors in Znq , and Eσ ∈ Zq .
If Y2 is independent of (X2 , E2 ), then we can directly calculate the distribution of σ 1 − σ 2 .
But now Y2 depends on (X2 , E2 ). To overcome this difficulty, we show that Y2 is independent
of (X2 , E2 ) under a condition of X2 that happens with very high probability.
Theorem 6.2. For any positive integer q, n, and a column vector s ∈ Znq , let φs denote the map
Znq → Zq : φs (x) = xT s. If there exits a coordinate of s which is not zero divisor in ring Zq , then
map φs is surjective.
Proof. Let us assume one coordinate of s, say s, has no zero divisor in ring Zq . Then the Zq → Zq
map between the two Zq -modules deduced by s: x 7→ sx, is injective, and thus surjective. Hence,
φs is surjective.
For a column vector s composed by random variables, denote by F (s) the event that φs is
surjective. The following theorem gives a lower bound of probability of F (s), where s ← χn . In
our application, this lower bound is very close to 1.
Theorem 6.3. Let p0 be the probability that e is a zero divisor in ring Zq , where e is subject to
χ. Then Pr[s ← χn : F (s)] ≥ 1 − pn0
Proof. From Theorem 6.2, if φs is not surjective, then all coordinates of s are zero divisors. Then
Pr[s ← χn : ¬F (s)] ≤ pn0 , and the proof is finished.
Theorem 6.4. If s, e ← χn , A ← Zn×n
, y = As + e ∈ Znq , then under the condition F (s), y is
q
independent of (s, e), and is uniformly distributed over Znq .
Proof. For all ỹ, s̃, ẽ, Pr[y = ỹ | s = s̃, e = ẽ, F (s)] = Pr[As̃ = ỹ − ẽ | s = s̃, e = ẽ, F (s)]. Let
A = (a1 , a2 , . . . , an )T , ỹ − ẽ = (c1 , c2 , . . . , cn )T , where ai ∈ Znq , and ci ∈ Zq , for every 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
Since φs is surjective, the number of possible choices of ai , satisfying aTi ·s̃ = ci , is |Kerφs | = q n−1 .
2
Hence, Pr[As̃ = ỹ − ẽ | s = s̃, e = ẽ, F (s)] = (q n−1 )n /q n = 1/q n . Since the right-hand side is
the constant 1/q n , the distribution of y is uniform over Znq , and is irrelevant of (s, e).
We now begin to analyze the error probability of the scheme presented in Figure 4.
Denote by E the event |XT1 (E2 +(Y2 ))−ET1 X2 −Eσ |q > d. Then Pr[E] = Pr[E|F (S)] Pr[F (S)]+
Pr[E|¬F (S)] Pr[¬F (S)]. From Theorem 6.4, we replace Y2 = AT X2 + E2 in the event E|F (S)
29
with uniformly distributed Y2 . Then,
Pr[E] = Pr[Y2 ← Znq : E|F (S)] Pr[F (S)] + Pr[E|¬F (S)] Pr[¬F (S)]
= Pr[Y2 ← Znq : E|F (S)] Pr[F (S)] + Pr[Y2 ← Znq : E|¬F (S)] Pr[¬F (S)]
+ Pr[E|¬F (S)] Pr[¬F (S)] − Pr[Y2 ← Znq : E|¬F (S)] Pr[¬F (S)]
= Pr[Y2 ← Znq : E] +
where || ≤ Pr[¬F (S)]. In our application, p0 is far from 1, and n is very large, by Theorem 6.3,
is very small, so we simply ignore . If Y2 is uniformly distributed, then (Y2 ) is a centered
uniform distribution. Then, the distribution of XT1 (E2 + (Y2 )) − ET1 X2 − Eσ can be directly
computed by programs.
As noted in [ADPS16,BCD+ 16], sampling from rounded Gaussian distribution (i.e., sampling
from a discrete Gaussian distribution to a high precision) constitutes one of major efficiency
bottleneck. In this work, for LWE-based key exchange, we are mainly concerned with the following
two kinds of efficiently sampleable distributions.
6.1.1
Binary Distribution
Binary-LWE is a variation of LWE, where the noise distribution is set to be χ = U({0, 1}).
With respect to m = n · (1 + Ω(1/ log n)) samples and large enough polynomial q ≥ nO(1) , the
hardness of binary-LWE is established in [MP13], with a reduction from some approximation
lattice problem in dimension Θ(n/ log n). Concrete error probability can be calculated on the
concrete parameters by the method in previous section.
For KC-based key exchange from binary-LWE, we have the following theorem, which means
that it is correct when the underlying parameter d satisfies d ≥ n + 1. For LWE-based KE from
OKCN, where 2md < q, we get that it is correct when q > 2m(n + 1). Actually, this theorem has
already been implied in the above analysis.
Theorem 6.5. If χ = U({0, 1}), and (params, Con, Rec) is a correct KC or AKC scheme where
d ≥ n + 1, the key exchange protocol described in Algorithm 4 is correct.
Proof. We prove that, for any (i, j), 1 ≤ i ≤ lA and 1 ≤ j ≤ lB , |Σ1 [i, j] − Σ2 [i, j]|q ≤ d holds
true. Denote X1 = (X̂1 , X̂2 , . . . , X̂lA ), E1 = (Ê1 , Ê2 , . . . , ÊlA ), and X2 = (X̂01 , X̂02 , . . . , X̂0lB ),
E2 = (Ê01 , Ê02 , . . . , Ê0lB ), where X̂i , X̂0i , Êi , Ê0i ∈ {0, 1}n . Then
|Σ1 [i, j] − Σ2 [i, j]|q = X̂Ti Ê0j − ÊTi X̂0j − Eσ [i, j]
≤
X̂Ti Ê0j
−
ÊTi X̂0j
q
q
+ |Eσ [i, j]|q
≤n + 1 ≤ d
However, cautions should be taken when deploying key exchange protocols based upon binaryLWE. By noting that any Binary-LWE sample satisfies a quadric equation, if no less than n2
samples can be used for an adversary, the secret and noise can be recovered easily. The work
√
2
[AG11] proposes an algorithm for binary-LWE with time complexity 2Õ(αq) . If αq = o( n),
2
this algorithm is subexponential, but it requires 2Õ((αq) ) samples. When m log q/(n + m) =
n/2+o(n)
o(n/ log n), [KF15] proposes a distinguishing attack with time complexity 2 ln (m log q/(n+m)−1) , which
results in a subexponential-time algorithm if m grows linearly in n.
30
6.1.2
Discrete Distributions
In this work, for LWE-based key exchange, we use the following two classes of discrete distributions, which are specified in Table 4 and Table 5 respectively, where “bits” refers to the number of
bits required to sample the distribution and “var.” means the standard variation of the Gaussian
distribution approximated. We remark that the discrete distributions specified in Table 5 are
just those specified and used in [BCD+ 16] for the LWE-based Frodo scheme.
dist.
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
dist.
bits
var.
8
12
12
16
16
1.10
0.90
1.66
1.66
1.30
bits
var.
8
12
12
16
1.25
1.00
1.75
1.75
0
94
1646
1238
19794
22218
probability of
±1
±2
±3
62
17
2
992
216
17
929
393
94
14865 6292 1499
15490 5242
858
±4
±5
12
200
67
1
15
2
probability of
order
divergence
15.0
75.0
30.0
500.0
500.0
1.0015832
1.0003146
1.0002034
1.0000274
1.0000337
order
divergence
25.0
40.0
100.0
500.0
1.0021674
1.0001925
1.0003011
1.0000146
0
±1
±2 in±3
±5 and
±6 their Rényi divergences.
Table 4: Discrete distributions
proposed
this±4
work,
D̄1
D̄2
D̄3
D̄4
88
1570
1206
19304
61
990
919
14700
20
248
406
6490
3
24
104
1659
1
15
245
1
21
1
Table 5: Discrete distributions for Frodo [BCD+ 16], and their Rényi divergences
q
Challenge
Classical
Recommended
Paranoid
Paranoid-512
210
211
214
214
212
n
334
554
718
818
700
l
m
8
8
8
8
16
21
22
24
24
22
g
OKCN
29
29
210
210
210
d
Frodo
2
2
2
2
2
OKCN
255
255
511
511
511
Frodo
127
127
255
255
255
dist.
D1
D2
D3
D4
D̄4
error probability
OKCN Frodo
2−47.9
2−14.9
2−39.4
2−11.5
2−37.9
2−10.2
2−32.6
2−8.6
2−33.6
2−8.3
bw. (kB)
|A| (kB)
|K|
6.75
12.26
20.18
22.98
33.92
139.45
422.01
902.17
1170.97
735.00
64
128
256
256
512
Table 6: Parameters proposed for OKCN-LWE when t = 0 (i.e., without cutting off least significant bits). “distr.” refers to the discrete distributions proposed in Table 4 and Table 5. “bw.”
means bandwidth in kilo-bytes (kB). “|A|” refers to the size of the matrix. |K| = l2 log m denotes
the length of consensus bits.
q
Challenge
Classical
Recommended
Paranoid
211
212
215
215
n
352
592
752
864
l
m
8
8
8
8
21
22
24
24
g
OKCN
22
22
23
23
d
Frodo
2
2
2
2
OKCN
383
383
895
895
Frodo
255
255
511
511
dist.
D̄1
D̄2
D̄3
D̄4
error probability
OKCN Frodo
2−80.1
2−41.8
2−70.3
2−36.2
2−105.9 2−38.9
2−91.9
2−33.8
bw. (kB)
OKCN Frodo
7.76
7.75
14.22 14.22
22.58 22.57
25.94 25.93
|A| (kB)
|K|
170.37
525.70
1060.32
1399.68
64
128
256
256
Table 7: Parameters of Frodo, and comparison with OKCN-LWE when t = 0. Here, “distr.” refers
to the discrete distributions specified in Table 5. Note that, on the parameters of Frodo, OKCNLWE achieves significantly lower error probability, which are negligible and are thus sufficient for
building CPA-secure public-key encryption schemes.
31
OKCN-T2
OKCN-T1
q
214
214
n
712
712
l
8
8
m
24
24
g
28
28
t
2
1
d
509
509
dist.
D5
D5
err.
2−39.0
2−52.3
bw. (kB)
18.58
19.29
|A| (kB)
887.15
887.15
|K|
256
256
Table 8: Parameters proposed for OKCN-LWE with t least significant bits cut off.
6.1.3
Instantiations, and Comparisons with Frodo
The comparisons, between the instantiations of our LWE-based KE protocol and Frodo, are
summarized in the following tables 6, 7 and 8. Note that, for presentation simplicity, we take
lA = lB = l for the sets of parameters under consideration. Also, for presentation simplicity,
we use OKCN to denote OKCN-LWE in these tables. For both “OKCN simple” proposed in
Algorithm 3 and “AKCN power 2” proposed in Algorithm 5, they achieve a tight parameter
constraint, specifically, 2md < q. In comparison, the parameter constraint achieved by Frodo is
4md < q. As we shall see, such a difference is one source that allows us to achieve better trade-offs
among error probability, security, (computational and bandwidth) efficiency, and consensus range.
In particular, it allows us to use q that is one bit shorter than that used in Frodo. Beyond saving
bandwidth, employing a one-bit shorter q also much improves the computational efficiency (as
the matrix A becomes shorter, and consequently the cost of generating A and the related matrix
operations are more efficient), and can render stronger security levels simultaneously. Note that,
when being transformed into PKE schemes, smaller matrix A means shorter public-key size. Put
in other words, on the same parameters of (q, m), OKCN allows a larger error distance d than
Frodo, resulting in significantly lower error probability. Here, we briefly highlight one performance
comparision: OKCN-T2 (resp., Frodo-recommended) has 18.58kB (resp., 22.57kB) bandwidth,
887.15kB (resp., 1060.32kB) matrix A, at least 134-bit (resp., 130-bit) quantum security, and
error probability 2−39 (resp., 2−38.9 ).
h
i
The error probability for OKCN-LWE in these tables are derived by computing Pr |Σ1 [i, j] − Σ2 [i, j]|q > d ,
for any 1 ≤ i ≤ lA and 1 ≤ j ≤ lB , and then applying the union bound. The concrete failure
probabilities are gotten by running the code slightly adjusted, actually simplified, from the open
source code of Frodo. The simplified code are available from Github http://github.com/OKCN.
6.1.4
Security Estimation
For security evaluation, similar to [ADPS16, BCD+ 16], we only consider the resistance to two
kinds of BKZ attacks, specifically primal attack and dual attack [CN11] [SE94], with respect
to the core-SVP hardness. The reader is referred to [ADPS16, BCD+ 16] for more details. The
concrete security levels are calculated by running the same code of Frodo. The evaluated security
levels are summarized in the following tables.
32
Scheme
Challenge
Classical
Recommended
Paranoid
Paranoid-512
OKCN-T2
Attack
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
m0
327
310
477
502
664
661
765
743
643
681
638
640
Rounded Gaussian
b
C
Q
275
–
–
272
–
–
444 138 126
439 137 125
500 155 141
496 154 140
586 180 164
582 179 163
587 180 164
581 179 163
480 149 136
476 148 135
P
–
–
100
99
112
111
130
129
131
129
108
107
Post-reduction
C
Q
P
–
–
–
–
–
–
132 120
95
131 119
94
146 133 105
145 132 104
179 163 130
178 162 129
180 164 130
178 162 129
148 135 107
147 134 106
Table 9: Security estimation of the parameters described in Table 6 and Table 8. “C, Q, P” stand
for “Classical, Quantum, Plausible” respectively. Numbers under these columns are the binary
logarithm of running time of the corresponding attacks. Numbers under “m0 , b” are the best
parameters for the attacks. “Rounded Gaussian” refers to the ideal case that noises and errors
follow the rounded Gaussian distribution. “Post-reduction” refers to the case of using discrete
distributions as specified in Table 4.
Scheme
Challenge
Classical
Recommended
Paranoid
Attack
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
m0
338
331
549
544
716
737
793
833
Rounded Gaussian
b
C
Q
266
–
–
263
–
–
442 138 126
438 136 124
489 151 138
485 150 137
581 179 163
576 177 161
P
–
–
100
99
110
109
129
128
Post-reduction
C
Q
P
–
–
–
–
–
–
132 120
95
130 119
94
145 132 104
144 130 103
178 162 129
177 161 128
Table 10: Security estimation of the parameters proposed for Frodo in [BCD+ 16], as specified in
Table 7.
7
Hybrid Construction of Key Exchange from LWE and LWR
in the Public-Key Setting
By composing a CPA-secure symmetric-key encryption scheme, the LWE-based key exchange
protocols presented Section 6 can be used to construct public-key encryption (PKE) schemes, by
treating (A, Y1 ) (resp., X1 ) as the static public key (resp., secret key). Moreover, AKC-based
key-exchange protocol can be directly used as a CPA-secure PKE scheme. To further improve
the efficiency of the resultant PKE scheme, the observation here is we can generate the ephemeral
Y2 in the ciphertext with LWR samples. This results in the following hybrid construction of key
33
Initiator
seed ← {0, 1}κ
A ← Znq B ×nA
sk = X1 ← χnA ×lA
E1 ← χnB ×lA
Y1 = AX1 + E1 ∈ Znq B ×lA
Responder
pk = (A, Y1 )
A = Gen(seed)
X2 ← χnB ×lB
Y2 = ⌊AT X2 ⌉p
Σ2 = ⌊Y1T X2 ⌉p
V ← Con(Σ2 , K2 , params)
Y2 ∈ Znp A ×lB , V ∈ ZlgA ×lB
Σ2 = XT1 Y2 mod p
K1 ← Rec(Σ1 , V, params)
Figure 5: AKC-based key exchange from LWE and LWR in the public-key setting, where pk =
(A, Y1 ) is fixed once and for all, K1 , K2 ∈ ZlmA ×lB and |K1 | = |K2 | = lA lB |m|.
exchange from LWE and LWR in the public-key setting. For applications to PKE, we focus on the
AKC-based protocol construction. Denote by (nA , nB , lA , lB , q, p, KC, χ) the system parameters,
where p|q, and we choose p and q to be power of 2. The AKC-based protocol from LWE and
LWR is presented in Figure 5.
The hybird construction of key exchange from LWE and LWR is similar to the underlying
protocol in Lizard [CKLS16]. The Lizard PKE scheme uses our AKCN as the underlying reconciliation mechnism (see more details in Appendix F), while our protocol is a general structure
that can be implemented with either KC or AKC. In order to improve efficiency, Lizard [CKLS16]
is based on the variants, referred to as spLWE and spLWR, of LWE and LWR with sparse secret.
We aim at providing parameter sets for long term security, and estimate the concrete security in
a more conservative way than [CKLS16] from the defender’s point of view.
7.1
Security and Error Rate Analysis
The security proof is very similar to LWE-basd and LWR-based key exchanges in previous sections, and is omitted here.
For the error probability, we have
p
p T
X1 AT X2 − {AT X2 }p =
XT1 AT X2 − XT1 {AT X2 }p
q
q
p T T
T
p
T
T
Y1 X2 − {Y1 X2 }p = (X1 A X2 + ET1 X2 − {Y1T X2 }p )
Σ2 = Y1 X2 p =
q
q
p T
Σ2 − Σ1 =
E1 X2 + XT1 {AT X2 }p − {ET1 X2 + XT1 AT X2 }p = bET1 X2 + XT1 {AT X2 }p ep
q
Σ1 = XT1 Y2 =
34
We can see that the distribution of Σ2 − Σ1 can be derived from the distribution of E1 X2 +
From Theorem 6.4, we know that for almost all (with overwhelm probability) given
X2 , the distribution of {AT X2 }p is the uniform distribution over [−q/2p, q/2p)nA . The concrete
error probability can then be derived numerically by computer programs. The codes and scripts
are available on Github http://github.com/OKCN.
XT1 {AT X2 }p .
7.2
Parameter Selection
For simplicity, we use the Gaussian distribution of the same variance (denote as σs2 ) for the noise
E1 , secrets X1 and X2 . We consider the weighted dual attack and weighted primal attack in
Section 5.3.
Recommended
Paranoid
σs2
2.0
2.0
nA
712
864
nB
704
832
q
215
215
p
212
212
l
8
8
m
24
24
g
28
28
pk
10.56
12.24
cipher
8.61
10.43
err.
2−63
2−52
|K|
256
256
Table 11: Parameters for the hybrid construction of key exchange from LWE and LWR. “err.”
refers to the overall error probability. “|K|” refers to the length of consensus bits. “pk” refers to
the kilo-byte (kB) size of the public key pk = (A, Y1 ). “cipher” refers to the kB size of (Y2 , V).
Scheme
Recommended
Paranoid
Attack
Primal
Dual
Primal
Dual
m0
699
672
808
789
b
464
461
590
583
LWE
C
144
143
181
179
Q
131
131
165
163
P
105
104
131
130
m0
664
665
856
765
b
487
483
585
579
LWR
C
151
150
180
178
Q
138
137
164
162
P
109
109
130
129
Table 12: Security estimation of the parameters described in Table 11.
35
8
RLWE-Based Key Exchange from KC and AKC
Initiator
seed ← {0, 1}κ
a = Gen(seed) ∈ Rq
x1 , e1 ← DZn ,α
y1 = a · x1 + e1
Responder
seed, y1 ∈ Rq
a = Gen(seed)
x2 , e2 ← DZn ,α
y2 = a · x2 + e2
eσ ← DZn ,α
σ 2 = y1 · x2 + eσ ∈ Rq
(k2 , v) ← Con(σ 2 , params)
y2 ∈ R q , v ∈ R g
σ 1 = y2 · x1 ∈ R q
k1 ← Rec(σ 1 , v, params)
Figure 6: RLWE-based key exchange from KC and AKC, where K1 , K2 ∈ Rq . The protocol
instantiated with OKCN specified in Algorithm 1 (resp., AKCN in Algorithm 4) is referred to as
OKCN-RLWE (resp., AKCN-RLWE).
Denote by (λ, n, q, α, KC) the system parameters, where λ is the security parameter, q ≥ 2 is a
positive prime number, α parameterizes the discrete Gaussian distribution DZn ,α , n denotes the
degree of polynomials in Rq , and Gen a PRG generating a ∈ Rq from a small seed.
Let KC = (params, Con, Rec) be a correct and secure KC scheme, where params = (q, g, m, d).
The KC-based key exchange protocol from RLWE is depicted in Figure 6, where the actual
session-key is derived from K1 and K2 via some key derivation function KDF . There, for
presentation simplicity, the Con and Rec functions are applied to polynomials, meaning they are
applied to each of the coefficients respectively. Note that σ 1 = y2 · x1 = a · x2 · x1 + e2 · x1 ,
σ 2 = y1 · x2 + eσ = a · x1 · x2 + e1 · x2 + eσ . As we choose x1 , x2 , e1 , e2 , eσ according to a
small noise distribution DZn ,α , the main part of σ 1 and that of σ 2 are the same a · x1 · x2 .
Hence, the corresponding coordinates of σ 1 and σ 2 are close in the sense of | · |q , from which
some key consensus can be reached. The error probability depends upon the concrete value of
α and the distance parameter d. As discussed in Section 5, a KC-based key exchange protocol
can be trivially extended to work on any correct and secure AKC scheme. As the bandwidth
of RLWE-based KE protocol has already been low, we do not apply the technique of cutting off
some least significant bits of each element of the polynomial y2 .
On security analysis. The security definition and proof of the RLWE-based key exchange
protocol can be straightforwardly adapted from those for the KE protocol based on LWE or
LWR. Briefly speaking, from Game G0 to Game G1 , we replace y1 with a uniformly random
polynomial in Rq . From Game G1 to Game G2 , we replace y2 and σ 2 with uniformly random
polynomials. Then, from the security of the underlying KC or AKC, we get that for any i,
1 ≤ i ≤ n, K2 [i] and v[i] are independent, and so the protocol is secure.
36
On implementations of RLWE-based KE. The protocol described in Figure 6 works on any hard
instantiation of the RLWE problem. But if n is power of 2, and prime q satisfies q mod 2n = 1,
then number-theoretic transform (NTT) can be used to speed up polynomial multiplication. The
performance can be further improved by using the Montgomery arithmetic and AVX2 instruction
set [ADPS16], and by carefully optimizing performance-critical routines (in particular, NTT) in
ARM assembly [AJS16].
For all the implementations considered in this work for RLWE-based KE, we use the same
parameters and noise distributions proposed for NewHope in [ADPS16], as described in Table 13.
They achieve about 281-bit (resp., 255-, 199-) security against classic (resp., quantum, plausible)
attacks. The reader is referred to [ADPS16] for details. In particular, the underlying noise
distribution is the centered binomial
distribution Ψ16 (rather than rounded Gaussian distribution
√
with the standard deviation 8), which can be rather trivially sampled in hardware and software
with much better protection against timing attacks.
8.1
RLWE-Based Key Exchange with Negligible Error Rate
When implemented with the same parameters proposed in [ADPS16] for NewHope, as shown in
Table 13 OKCN-RLWE and AKCN-RLWE reach 1024 consensus bits, with a failure probability
around 2−40 that, we suggest, suffices for most applications of key exchange. In order for reaching
a negligible error probability, particularly for achieving a CPA-secure PKE scheme, we need to
further lower the error probability.
A straightforward approach to reducing the error probability is to use the technique of
NewHope by encoding and decoding the four-dimensional lattice D̃4 . With such an approach,
the error probability can be lowered to about 2−61 , but the shared-key size is reduced from 1024
to 256. AKCN-RLWE equipped with this approach, referred to as AKCN-4:1, is presented and
analyzed in Appendix D. We note that, in comparison with NewHope-simple recently proposed
in [ADPS16b], AKCN-4:1 still has (slight) performance advantage in bandwidth expansion; specifically expanding 256 bits by AKCN-4:1 vs. 1024 bits by NewHope-simple compared to that of
NewHope.5
Decoding the 24-dimensional Leech lattice is also recently considered in [Pop16]. But decoding
the 4-dimensional lattice D̃4 has already been relatively complicated and computationally less
efficient. Another approach is to employ error correction code (ECC). Unfortunately, in general,
the ECC-based approach can be more inefficient and overburdened than NewHope’s approach.
In this work, we make a key observation on RLWE-based key exchange, by proving that the
errors in different positions in the shared-key are independent when n is large. Based upon this
observation, we present a super simple and fast code, referred to as single-error correction (SEC)
code, to correct at least one bit error. By equipping OKCN/AKCN with the SEC code, we achieve
the simplest RLWE-based key exchange from both OKCN and AKCN, referred to as OKCN-SEC
and AKCN-SEC respectively, with negligible error probability for much longer shared-key size.
The comparisons among these RLWE-based protocols are summarized in Table 13. We note
that for RLWE-based KE with negligible error probability, in general, AKC-based protocols are
relatively simpler than KC-based protocols.
5
The bandwidth expansion, for both AKCN-4:1 and NewHope-simple, can be further compressed but at the
price of losing operation simplicity.
37
SKCN-RLWE
SKCN-RLWE
AKCN-RLWE
AKCN-RLWE
SKCN-SEC
SKCN-SEC
SKCN-SEC
AKCN-SEC
AKCN-SEC
NewHope
AKCN-4:1-RLWE
g
24
26
24
26
22
23
23
24
24
22
22
|K|
1024
1024
1024
1024
765
765
837
765
837
256
256
d
2879
3023
2687
2975
2303
2687
2687
2687
2687
-
bw.(B)
4128
4384
4128
4384
3904
4032
4021
4128
4128
3872
3904
per.
2−48
2−52
2−42
2−51
2−31
2−42
2−42
2−42
2−42
2−69
2−69
nH
4
4
5
4
5
-
err.
2−38
2−42
2−32
2−41
2−48
2−70
2−69
2−70
2−69
2−61
2−61
Table 13: Comparisons with NewHope. All schemes in the table use the same noise distribution
Ψ16 used in [ADPS16], i.e. the sum of 16 independent centered binomial variables. And all
schemes in the table share the parameter (q = 12289, n = 1024, m = 21 ). |K| refers to the total
binary length of consensus bits. bw. (B) refers to the bandwidth in bytes. err. refers to failure
probability. “nH ” refers to the dimension of SEC code used. “per” refers to the per bit error rate
before applying the SEC code. “err.” refers to overall error rate.
8.2
On the Independence of Errors in Different Positions
Suppose f (x), g(x) are two polynomials of degree n, whose coefficients are drawn independently
from Gaussian. Let h(x) = f (x) · g(x) ∈ R[x]/(xn + 1). We show that for every two different
integers 0 ≤ c1 , c2 < n, the joint distribution of (h[c1 ], h[c2 ]) will approach to the two-dimensional
Gaussian when n tends to infinity. Hence, for the basic construction of RLWE-based key exchange
from KC and AKC presented in Figure 6, it is reasonable to assume that the error probability of
any two different positions are independent when n is sufficiently large.
For representation simplicity, for any polynomial f , let f [i] denote the coefficient of xi .
Lemma 8.1. Suppose f (x), g(x) ∈ R[x]/(xn + 1) are two n-degree polynomials whose coefficients
are drawn independently from N (0, σ 2 ). Let h(x) = f (x) · g(x) ∈ R[x]/(xn + 1), where h(x)
is represented as an n-degree polynomial. For any two different integers 0 ≤ c1 , c2 < n, the
characteristic function of the two-dimensional random vector (h[c1 ], h[c2 ]) ∈ R2 is
− 1
h
i n−1
Y
2
2k + 1
i(t1 h[c1 ]+t2 h[c2 ])
4
2
2
φc1 ,c2 (t1 , t2 ) = E e
=
1 + σ t1 + t2 + 2t1 t2 cos π(c1 − c2 )
n
k=0
(5)
Proof. One can observe that
X
t1 h[c1 ] + t2 h[c2 ] = t1
f [i]g[j] −
i+j=c1
X
f [i]g[j] + t2
i+j=c1 +n
= t1 f T Ac1 g + t2 f T Ac2 g = f T (t1 Ac1 + t2 Ac2 )g
38
X
i+j=c2
f [i]g[j] −
X
i+j=c2 +n
f [i]g[j]
Where f = (f [0], f [1], . . . , f [n − 1])T , g = (g[0], g[1], . . . , g[n − 1])T , and the notations Ac1 , Ac2
are defined by
1
...
1
Ac =
−1
.
.
.
−1
The value 1 in the first row is in the c-th column.
As t1 Ac1 + t2 Ac2 is symmetric, it can be orthogonally diagonalize as PT ΛP, where P is orthogonal, and Λ is diagonal. Hence, φc1 ,c2 (t1 , t2 ) = E[exp(i(Pf )T Λ(Pg))]. Since P is orthogonal,
it keeps the normal distribution unchanged. Hence, (Pf )T Λ(Pg) equals to the sum of n scaled
products of two independent one-dimensional Gaussian.
Suppose λ1 , λ2 , . . . , λn are the eigenvalues of t1 Ac1 +t2 Ac2 , and φ is the characteristic function
of the product of two independent one-dimensional standard Gaussian. Then we have
n−1
Y
φc1 ,c2 (t1 , t2 ) =
φ(σ 2 λk )
(6)
k=0
From [Sim02], φ(t) = (1 + t2 )−1/2 . For λk , we further observe that
(t1 Ac1 + t2 Ac2 )2 = (t21 + t22 )I + t1 t2 (Ac1 Ac2 + Ac2 Ac1 )
= (t21 + t22 )I + t1 t2 (Gc2 −c1 + Gc1 −c2 ),
where
G=
−1
1
1
..
.
1
The characteristic polynomial of G is xn + 1. Hence, λk satisfies
2k + 1
2
2
2
λk = t1 + t2 + 2t1 t2 cos π(c1 − c2 )
n
By taking this into Equation 6, we derive the Equation 5.
Theorem 8.1.
For any fixed integers 0 ≤ c1 , c2 < n, c1 6= c2 , when n tends to infinity, the dis] h[c2 ]
√1
√
tribution of σh[c
converges (in distribution) to the two-dimensional normal distribution
2 n , σ2 n
N (0, I2 ).
39
Proof. Let φ(t1 , t2 ) denote the characteristic function of the random vector
for fixed t1 , t2 ,
h[c1 ] h[c2 ]
√ ,
√
σ2 n σ2 n
n−1
1X
2k + 1
1 2
2
ln(φ(t1 , t2 )) = −
t + t2 + 2t1 t2 cos π(c1 − c2 )
ln 1 +
2
n 1
n
k=0
n−1
1X 1 2
2k + 1
2
=−
t + t2 + 2t1 t2 cos π(c1 − c2 )
+ rk
2
n 1
n
. Then,
(7)
(8)
k=0
n−1
=−
1X
1 2
t1 + t22 −
rk ,
2
2
(9)
k=0
where rk is the Lagrange remainders. So, |rk | ≤ λ4k /2n2 . Since λ2k ≤ (|t1 | + |t2 |)2 , we have
|rk | ≤ (|t1 | + |t2 |)4 /2n2 .
When n tends to infinity, φ(t1 , t2 ) converges pointwise to exp(−(t21 + t22 )/2), which is the characteristic function of the two-dimensional normal
distribution
N (0, I2 ). From Lévy’s convergence
h[c1 ] h[c2 ]
theorem, we derive that the random vector σ2 √n , σ2 √n converges in distribution to the normal
distribution N (0, I2 ).
8.3
Reducing Error Rate with Single-Error Correction Code
Note that, for the basic protocol construction of RLWE-based key exchange from KC and AKC
presented in Figure 6, it has already achieved per-bit error probability of about 2−42 . The
observation here is that, by Theorem 8.1 on the independence of error in different positions
when n is large, if we can correct one bit error the error probability will be greatly lowered to
be negligible. Towards this goal, we present an variant of the Hamming code, referred to as
single-error correction (SEC) code, which can correct one-bit error in a very simple and fast way.
8.3.1
Single-Error Correction Code
All the arithmetic operations in this section are over Z2 . For a positive integer nH , denote
NH = 2nH , and define the matrix H as following, where for any i, 1 ≤ i ≤ NH − 1, the i-th
column of H just corresponds to the binary presentation of i.
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ··· 0 1 0 1
0 1 1 0 0 1 1 · · · 0 0 1 1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
·
·
·
1
1
1
1
HnH ×(NH −1) =
···
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ··· 1 1 1 1
H −1
For arbitrary x = (x1 , . . . , xNH −1 ) ∈ ZN
, let pT = HxT . It is easy to check that the j-th
2
element of p is the exclusive-or of all xi ’s satisfying the j-th least significant bit of i is 1, where
1 ≤ j ≤ nH and 1 ≤ i ≤ NH − 1. Specifically, the first element of p is the exclusive-or of all xi
that the least significant bit of i is 1, and the second element of p is the exclusive-or of all xi
that the second least significant bit of i is 1, and so on. Denote p = (p1 , p2 , . . . , pnH ). We can
combine the bits in p into a binary number p = 20 p1 + 21 p2 + . . . 2nH −1 pnH . The construction of
H directly leads to the following proposition.
40
Proposition 8.1. If pT = HxT , and the Hamming weight of x is 1, then p is the subscript index
of the only 1 in x.
The single-error correction code C is defined by
n
o
nH
NH −1
T
T
H −1
C = (x0 , x, p) ∈ Z2 × ZN
×
Z
|
x
=
⊕
x
,
p
=
Hx
0
i
2
2
i=1
The encoding algorithm is straightforward and depicted in Algorithm 13.
We now show that C can correct one bit error. Suppose x is encoded into c = (x0 , x, p). For
some reasons, such as the noise in communication channel, the message c may be changed into
c0 = (x00 , x0 , p0 ). We only need to consider the case that at most one bit error occurs. If x00 equals
to the parity bit of x0 , then no error occurs in x0 and x. Otherwise, there is one bit error in x00
or x0 , but p0 = p (as we assume there exists at most one bit error that has already occurred in
x00 or x0 ). We calculate p00 = Hx0T ⊕ p0T . In fact, p00 = Hx0T ⊕ pT = H(x0T ⊕ xT ). If the one-bit
error occurs in x0 , by Proposition 8.1, p00 is the subscript index of the error bit. If the one-bit
error occurs on x00 , then x0 = x, and p00 = H0 = 0. Hence, p00 always equals to the subscript
index of the error bit.
The decoding algorithm is depicted in Algorithm 14. Note that, according to the special form
of H, the matrix multiplication HxT in both encoding and decoding can be done with simple bit
operations like bit shifts and bitwise exclusive-or (such an implementation is given in Appendix
E). Moreover, for AKCN-SEC and OKCN-SEC, the calculations in Lines 2-4 in Algorithm 14 are
executed only with probability around 2−40 , so the decoding is extremely fast.
Algorithm 13 EncodeC (x = (x1 , . . . , xNH −1 ))
Algorithm
14
(x1 , . . . , xNH −1 ), p)
1:
H −1
x0 = ⊕N
i=1 xi
2: pT = HxT
3: c = (x0 , x, p)
4: return c
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
8.3.2
H −1
p = ⊕N
i=0 xi
if p = 1 then
i = HxT ⊕ p
xi = xi ⊕ 1
end if
return x
DecodeC (x0 , x
=
. bitwise exclusive-or
AKC and KC with SEC code
We divide the n-bit string k1 into bn/(NH + nH )c blocks, then apply our SEC code in each block.
Note that this approach can also correct more than one bit errors, if at most one bit error occurs
in each block.
41
Alice
σ 1 ∈ Znq
k1 = EncodeC (k′1 )
v ← Con(σ 1 , k1 , params)
Bob
σ 2 ∈ Znq
≈
v
k2 ← Rec(σ 2 , v, params)
k′2 = DecodeC (k2 )
H +nH
Figure 7: Depiction of AKC with SEC code, where k1 , k2 ∈ ZN
, |k01 | = |k02 | = NH − 1. If
2
0
0
the Hamming distance between k1 and k2 is at most 1, then k1 = k2 .
Figure 7 depicts the AKC scheme equipped with the SEC code. Note that EncodeC can
be calculated off-line. Suppose the per bit error probability of k1 and k2 is p, then under the
assumption that the errors in different positions are independent, we can estimate that the overall
2
heuristic error probability of k01 and k02 is no larger than b NH n+nH cCN
p2 .
H +nH
Alice
H +nH
σ 1 ∈ ZN
q
≈
Bob
H +nH
σ 2 ∈ ZN
q
(k1 , v) ← Con(σ 1 , params)
Denote k1 as (x0 , x = (x1 , . . . , xNH −1 ), p)
v0 = EncodeC (x) ⊕ k1
v, v0 ∈ V
k2 ← Rec(σ 2 , v, params)
Denote k2 as (x00 , x0 = (x01 , . . . , x0NH −1 ), p0 )
x0 = DecodeC (k2 ⊕ v0 )
Figure 8: Depiction of application of SEC code to KC, where k1 , k2 ∈ Z2NH +nH . If k1 and k2
have at most one different bit, then x = x0 .
For KC equipped with the SEC code, we propose the algorithm depicted in Figure 8. Note
that Alice only needs to send nH + 1 bits of v0 , as the second to NH th elements of v0 are all zeros.
Bob calculates x0 = DecodeC (k2 ⊕ v0 ). In fact, k2 ⊕ v0 = EncodeC (x) ⊕ (k1 ⊕ k2 ). Hence, if the
Hamming distance between k1 and k2 is 1, then x0 = x. To prove security of the algorithm in
Figure 8, we need the following theorem.
L
L
H −1
H +nH
Theorem 8.2. Let V = Z2 × {0 ∈ ZN
} × Zn2 H , then ZN
=C
V, where
denotes
2
2
direct sum.
Proof. For any k1 = (x0 , x = (x1 , . . . , xNH −1 ), p) ∈ Z2NH +nH , let c = EncodeC (x) and v0 = c ⊕ k1 .
We have the decomposition k1 = c ⊕ v0 , where c ∈ C and v0 ∈ V.
Next, we prove V ∩ C = 0. If k = (x0 , x, p) ∈ V ∩ C, then x = 0, which implies x0 = 0 and
pT = H0 = 0. Hence, k = 0.
When k1 is subjected to uniform distribution, then by Theorem 8.2, after the decomposition
k1 = c ⊕ v0 where c ∈ C and v0 ∈ V, c and v0 are subjected to uniform distribution in C and
V respectively. And c and v0 are independent. As both Z2NH −1 → C and x 7→ EncodeC (x)
42
are one-to-one correspondence, we derive that x and v0 are independent, and x is uniformly
distributed.
On the desirability of OKCN-SEC and AKCN-SEC. OKCN-SEC and AKCN-SEC are
desirable on the following grounds:
• To our knowledge, OKCN-SEC and AKCN-SEC are the simplest RLWE-based KE protocols with negligible error probability, which are better suitable for hardware or software
implementations than encoding and decoding the four-dimensional lattice D̃4 . Note that
SEC can be implemented with simple bit operations. Moreover, with probability about
1 − 2−40 , the decoding only involves the XOR operations in Line-1 of Algorithm 13, which
is extremely simple and fast.
• AKCN-SEC can be directly transformed into a CPA-secure PKE scheme for encrypting
837-bit messages with error probability about 2−69 , while AKCN4:1-RLWE and NewHopesimple are for encrypting 256-bit messages with error probability about 2−61 .
• It is desirable to have KE protocols that directly share or transport keys of larger size,
on the following grounds. Firstly, it is commonly expected that, in the post-quantum
era, symmetric-key cryptographic primitives like AES need larger key sizes, in view of the
quadratic speedup by Grover’s search algorithm and the possibility of more sophisticated
quantum attacks [KM10, KLL15] against symmetric-key cryptography. Secondly, in some
more critical application areas than public commercial usage, larger key size actually has
already been mandated nowadays. Thirdly, when KE being used within TLS, actually
a pair of keys (KCS , KSC ), and even more, is needed, where KCS (resp., KSC ) is for
generating messages from client (resp., server) to server (resp., client). (KCS , KSC ) is
usually derived via a key-derivation function (KDF) from the session-key output by the KE
protocol. With a KE protocol of larger shared-key size, the KDF can be waived, which
simplifies the software or hardware implementations (particularly at the client side) and
strengthens security simultaneously.
• As clarified, the SEC approach fails only when there are more than one bit errors in some
block, and is versatile in the sense: the smaller (resp., larger) is the block size nH , the lower
the error probability (resp., bandwidth expansion) will be. The performances for some
instantiations of OKCN-SEC and AKCN-SEC are summarized in Table 13.
9
Performance Comparison: Benchmark
The work [SM16] introduces the Open Quantum Safe Project. liboqs is one part of this project.
liboqs provides the interface for adding new key exchange schemes, benchmark, and an easy way
to integrate to OpenSSL.
We fork the liboqs on Github and add our OKCN-LWR-Recommended and OKCN-LWERecommended. Most of the source codes are modified from Frodo-Recommended provided in
liboqs.
43
time(us)
stdev
RLWE BCNS15
Alice 0 1006.497 10.909
Bob
1623.353 14.045
Alice 1
201.335
1.268
RLWE NewHope
Alice 0
81.430 26.947
Bob
123.714
4.504
Alice 1
26.631
1.878
LWE Frodo recommended
Alice 0 1443.915 10.990
Bob
1940.616 12.809
Alice 1
170.109
3.655
LWR OKCN recommended
Alice 0 1161.154 11.839
Bob
1722.525 12.401
Alice 1
133.984
3.980
LWE OKCN recommended
Alice 0 1335.453 13.460
Bob
1753.240 14.293
Alice 1
146.162
3.528
cycle
stdev
bw. (B)
2309859
3725552
461976
24996
32220
2805
4096
4244
-
186797
283841
61048
61827
10279
4173
1824
2048
-
3313704
4453734
390331
25236
29439
8317
11280
11288
-
2664789
3953182
307404
27129
28400
9065
9968
8224
-
3064789
4023632
335380
30871
32851
8035
9968
8608
-
Table 14: Benchmark of liboqs integrated with OKCN-LWE-Recommended. “time(us)” refers to
mean time that spent on each iteration. “cycle” refers to mean number of cpu cycles. “stdev”
refers to population standard deviation of time or cpu cycles. “bw. (B)” refers to bandwidth,
counted in bytes.
We run benchmark of liboqs on Ubuntu Linux 16.04, GCC 5.4.0, Intel Core i7-4712MQ
2.30GHz, with hyperthreading and TurboBoost disabled, and the CPU frequency fixed to 2.30GHz
(by following the instructions on http://bench.cr.yp.to/supercop.html). The benchmark
result (Table 14) shows that OKCN-LWR-Recommended and OKCN-LWE-Recommended are
faster than Frodo, and use smaller bandwidth.
We modify the source code of NewHope. We only change the reconciliation part of NewHope
to our OKCN/AKCN, and keep other parts (e.g. NTT) unchanged. The benchmark of our
RLWE-AKCN-SEC and RLWE-OKCN-SEC are shown in Table 15. The environment is the same
as above. We can see that the simplicity of our reconciliation mechanisms result in significant
improvement of this part in the key exchange scheme.
con
rec
median
average
median
average
AKCN-SEC
8032
8169
7420
7625
OKCN-SEC
12020
12093
7356
7369
NewHope
15276
15448
10548
10498
Table 15: Benchmark of AKCN/OKCN-SEC and NewHope. Numbers in the table are median
and average of cpu cycles.
44
10
More Applications and Future Works
The composition of a secure KE protocol (with negligible error probability) and a CPA-secure
symmetric-key encryption scheme (SKE) yields a CPA-secure PKE scheme. And any CPA-secure
PKE can be transformed into a CCA-secure one via the FO-transformation [FO13, FO99, Pei14,
TU15] in the quantum random oracle model. If we view 2−60 to be negligible, then OKCN-LWE
and AKCN-LWE (on the same parameters of Frodo), AKCN-4:1-RLWE (on the same parameters
of NewHope), and OKCN-SEC and AKCN-SEC can be used to build CPA-secure PKE schemes.
Moreover, AKCN-LWE, AKCN-4:1-RLWE, and AKCN-SEC can be used directly for CPA-secure
PKE scheme (without composing SKE).
One particularly important application of public-key cryptography is key transport (i.e.,
public-key encryption of a random symmetric key), which is in particular demanded by the
Tor project [Nic] and NIST [NIS]. We note that our AKC-based KE protocols can just be used
for key transport.
Any secure KE protocol can be transformed, in a black-box way, into an authenticated
key exchange (AKE) protocol by additionally using a secure signature scheme via the SIGMA
paradigm [Kra03]. SIGMA is just the basis of authentication mechanism for the secure transport protocol TLS in the client/server setting. Recently, the next generation of TLS, specifically
TLS1.3, is now under development [Res]; And developing post-quantum secure TLS protocol is
now receiving more and more efforts or attention both from research community and from standardization agencies. Compared to the currently deployed TLS1.2 standard, one salient change
(among others) made in TLS1.3 is that the server now plays the role of the responder. The
heavy workload in the server, particularly at peak time, is one of the major sources that causes
slower server responsiveness or causes the server an easy target of more and more vicious DDoS
attacks. We suggest that the predicament faced by the server can be mitigated with AKC-based
KE protocols like AKCN-LWE, AKCN-4:1-RLWE, and AKCN-SEC, by taking advantage of the
session-key predetermination and online/offline parallel computability enjoyed by them. The
integration of the developed protocols into TLS is left to future works.
Finally, as a fundamental building tool for lattice-based cryptography, we suggest OKCN,
AKCN, and the various KE protocols based on them, are of independent value. They may possibly
find more applications in more advanced cryptographic primitives (e.g., oblivious transfer, IBE,
ABE, FHE) from LWR, LWE and RLWE, by simplifying their design and analysis with versatile
performance optimization or balance.
11
ZarZar: RLWE-Based Key Exchange from KC and AKC
Previously, [ADPS16] proposes practical RLWE key exchange NewHope, whose reconciliation
mechanism uses lattice D2 . [ADPS16b] proposes a variant NewHope-Simple, which simplifies the
reconciliation mechanism of NewHope. However, the slowest part of NewHope and NewHopesimple is the 1024-dimension Number Theoretic Transform (NTT). Hence, the simplification of
the reconciliation mechanism does not bring much improvement of the overall efficiency. [ADPS16]
also provides JarJar, which is a key exchange based on 512-dimension RLWE, and its reconciliation mechanism is based on D2 . However, JarJar can only provide 118-bit security on best known
quantum attack from [ADPS16].
In this section, we propose a lightweight RLWE key exchange named ZarZar. ZarZar uses
lattice E8 , which is in higher dimension and thus denser than D2 . This allows us to choose smaller
dimension of RLWE with larger noise. NTT of 512-dimension in ZarZar costs nearly half of that
45
of NewHope. Although the dimension of E8 is higher than D2 , based on the structure of E8 , we
propose fast encoding and decoding algorithms. To improve the efficiency of sampling noise of
large variance, we propose a fast sample method.
In our parameter set, n = 512. We divide the 512 coefficients of the polynomial σ 1 and
σ 2 into 64 groups, where each group is composed by 8 coefficients. In specific, denote R =
Z[x]/(x8 + 1), Rq = R/qR, K = Q[x]/(x8 + 1) and KR = K ⊗ R ' R[x]/(x8 + 1). Then the
polynomial σ 1 can be represented as σ 1 (x) = σ0 (x64 ) + σ1 (x64 )x + · · · + σ63 (x64 )x63 , where
σi (x) ∈ Rq for i = 0, 1, . . . 63. σ 2 can be divided in the same way. Then we only need to
construct the reconciliation mechanism for each σi (x), and finally combine the keys together. To
do this, we first need to introduce the lattice E8 and its encoding and decoding.
11.1
E8 and its Encoding and Decoding
We construct lattice E8 from the Extended Hamming Code in dimension 8, H8 . H8 refers to the
4-dimension linear subspace of 8-dimension linear space Z82 .
H8 = {c ∈ Z82 | c = zH mod 2, z ∈ Z4 }
where
1
0
H=
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
The encoding algorithm is straightforward: given a 4-bit string k1 , calculate k1 H. This
operation can be done efficiently by bitwise operations. We combine this encoding with AKCN.
The complete algorithm is shown in Algorithm 15.
Algorithm 15 Con with encoding in E8
1: procedure Con(σ 1 ∈ Z8q , k1 ∈ Z42 , params)
j
m
2:
v = gq σ 1 + q−1
(k
H
mod
2)
mod g
1
2
3:
return v
4: end procedure
The decoding algorithm finds the solution of the closest vector problem (CVP) for the lattice
E8 . For any given x ∈ R8 , CVP asks which lattice point in E8 is closest to x. Based on the structure of E8 , we propose an efficient decoding algorithm. Let C = {(x1 , x1 , x2 , x2 , x3 , x3 , x4 , x4 ) ∈
Z82 | x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 = 0 mod 2}. In fact, C is spanned by the up most three rows of H. Hence,
E8 = C ∪ (C + c), where c = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1) is the last row of H. For a given x ∈ R8 , to solve
CVP of x in E8 , we solve CVP of x and x − c in C, and then choose the one that has smaller
distance.
Algorithm 16 Rec with decoding in E8
1: procedure Rec(σ 2 ∈ Z8q , v ∈ Z8g , params)
j m
2:
k2 = DecodeE8 gq v − σ 2
3:
return k2
4: end procedure
46
Algorithm 17 Decoding in E8 and C
1: procedure DecodeE8 (x ∈ Z8q )
2:
for i = 0 . . . 7 do
3:
costi,0 = |xi |2q
2
4:
costi,1 = |xi + q−1
2 |q
5:
end for
6:
(k00 , TotalCost00 ) ← Decode00
C (costi∈0...7,b∈{0,1} )
01
01
01
7:
(k , TotalCost ) ← DecodeC (costi∈0...7,b∈{0,1} )
8:
if TotalCost00 < TotalCost01 then
9:
b=0
10:
else
11:
b=1
12:
end if
13:
(k0 , k1 , k2 , k3 ) ← k0b
14:
k2 = (k0 , k1 ⊕ k0 , k3 , b)
15:
return k2
16: end procedure
b b
17: procedure DecodeC0 1 (costi∈0...7,b∈{0,1} ∈ Z8×2 )
18:
mind = +∞
19:
mini = 0
20:
TotalCost = 0
21:
for j = 0 . . . 3 do
22:
c0 ← cost2j,b0 + cost2j+1,b1
23:
c1 ← cost2j,1−b0 + cost2j+1,1−b1
24:
if c0 < c1 then
25:
ki ← 0
26:
else
27:
ki ← 1
28:
end if
29:
TotalCost ← TotalCost + cki
30:
if c1−ki − cki < mind then
31:
mind ← c1−ki − cki
32:
mini ← i
33:
end if
34:
end for
35:
if k0 + k1 + k2 + k3 mod 2 = 1 then
36:
kmini ← 1 − kmini
37:
TotalCost ← TotalCost + mind
38:
end if
39:
k = (k0 , k1 , k2 , k3 )
40:
return (k, TotalCost)
41: end procedure
47
Then we consider how to solve CVP in C. For an x ∈ R8 , we choose (x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ) ∈ Z42 , such
that (x1 , x1 , x2 , x2 , x3 , x3 , x4 , x4 ) is closest to x. However, x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 mod 2 may equal to 1.
In such cases, we choose the 4-bit string (x01 , x02 , x03 , x04 ) such that (x01 , x01 , x02 , x02 , x03 , x03 , x04 , x04 ) is
secondly closest to x. Note that (x01 , x02 , x03 , x04 ) has at most one-bit difference from (x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ).
The detailed algorithm is depicted in Algorithm 17. Considering potential timing attack, all the
“if” conditional statements can be implemented by constant time bitwise operations. In practice,
01
Decode00
C and DecodeC are implemented as two subroutines.
For algorithm 17, in DecodeE8 , we calculate costi,b , where i = 0, 1, . . . , 7, b ∈ {0, 1}, which
refer to the contribution to the total 2-norm when xi = b. Decode00
C solves the CVP in lattice C,
and Decode01
solves
the
CVP
in
lattice
C
+
c.
Then
we
choose
the
one that has smaller distance.
C
q−1
b0 b1
DecodeC calculates the ki , i = 0, 1, 2, 3 such that 2 (k0 ⊕ b0 , k0 ⊕ b1 , k1 ⊕ b0 , k1 ⊕ b1 , k2 ⊕ b0 , k2 ⊕
b1 , k3 ⊕ b0 , k3 ⊕ b1 ) is closest to x. We use mind and mini to find the second closest vector.
Finally, we check the parity to decide which one should be returned.
The following theorem gives a condition of success of the encoding and decoding algorithm
in Algorithm 15 and Algorithm 16. For simplicity, for any σ = (x0 , x1 , . . . , x7 ) ∈ Z8q , we define
P
kσk2q,2 = 7i=0 |xi |2q .
√
Theorem 11.1. If kσ 1 − σ 2 kq,2 ≤ (q − 1)/2 − 2 gq + 1 , then k1 and k2 calculated by Con and
Rec are equal.
Proof. The minimal Hamming distance of r
the Extended Hamming code H8 is 4. Hence, the
2
q−1
× 4 = (q − 1)/2.
minimal distance in the lattice we used is 21
2
We can find , 1 ∈ [−1/2, 1/2]8 , θ ∈ Z8 such that
q
q g
q−1
q
v − σ2 = v + − σ2 =
σ1 +
k1 H + + θg + 1 − σ 2
g
g
g q
2
q−1
q
= (σ 1 − σ 2 ) +
k1 H + + 1 + θq
2
g
√
Hence, the bias from q−1
k1 H is no larger than kσ 1 − σ 2 kq,2 + gq kk + 2 ≤ kσ 1 − σ 2 kq,2 +
2
√ q
2 g + 1 . If this value is less than the minimal distance (q − 1)/2, the decoding will be correct,
which implies k1 = k2 .
11.2
Parameters and Implementation
We shall explain why our key exchange based on E8 outperforms JarJar, which uses D2 in
[ADPS16]. E8 is densitest in 8-dimension, and it is denser than D2 . Specifically, when E√8 is
embeded into Z8q , the minimal distance of 2q E8 is 2q , while the minimal distance of qD2 is 42 q.
Both E8 and D2 can extract 256-bit key from polynomial whose degree is 512. As we shall see in
Figure 9, the logarithm of probability is almost propotional to the square of the distance between
σ 1 and σ 2 . Hence, the smaller minimal distance allows us to choose Gaussian of larger deviation
in secrets and noises, which garantees at least 128-bit post-quantum safty of the protocol.
Encoding and decoding in E8 may be more slower than D2 , but we half the time of numerical
theoretic transform (NTT) compared to NewHope by setting n = 512. Note that the efficiency
of NTT dominates the overall efficiency. Hence, the trade off is worthwhile.
48
11.2.1
Parameters
We choose the parameter (q = 12289, n = 512, σ 2 = 22). See Table 16 for the security estimation. The attack time estimation of NewHope seems much larger than our ZarZar. However, as
NewHope only reach 256-bit shared key. The post-quantum attacker may attack its symmetric
encryption in 128-bit time. In addition, the security level is estimated in a very conservative way.
The number 129 in column Q does not mean best known attack can achieve 2129 time.
Primal
Dual
m
646
663
b
491
489
C
143
143
Q
130
129
P
101
101
Table 16: Security estimation for ZarZar.
11.2.2
Noise distribution
NewHope uses the centered binary distribution
Ψ16 as the secrete and noise distribution. However,
√
the deviation in our parameter set (σ = 22) is much larger than NewHope, this method requires
too many random bits. Note that the generation of random bits costs a lot of time. Frodo uses
a table to generate a discrete distribution that is very close to the rounded Gaussian. However,
in our parameter set, the table will be too large to sample efficiently. Hence, we propose the
distribution B a,b , where a and b are two integers.
Algorithm 18 Sample r from B a,b
Pb
Pa
1: r ←
i=1 getOneRandomBit() −
i=1 getOneRandomBit() + 2 ∗
a
2
+b
The variation of r in Algorithm 18 is a4 + b, and the expect value of r is 0. By the central limit
theorem, the distribution of r is close to a discrete Gaussian. In our implementation, we choose
a = 24, b = 16, and the summation of the random bits are calculated by fast bit counting.
ZarZar
NewHope
n
512
1024
a
30
9
P
B 24,16
Ψ16
σ2
22
8
Ra (P ||Q)
1.0016
1.00063
Ra (P ||Q)5n
65.71
26
Table 17: Comparison of Renyi divergence. Q refers to the rounded Gaussian of variance σ 2 .
The closeness of B 24,16 and the rounded Gaussian of variance 22 is measured in Table 17.
Recall that the Renyi divergence increase as a increase. Hence, B 24,16 and rounded Gaussian of
variance 22 are more close compared to Ψ16 and rounded Gaussian of variance 8. We use a larger
a than NewHope so that the potential security decline can be smaller, although no attacks known
make use of the information of different noise distributions.
49
11.2.3
Benchmark
NTT
NTT−1
sample noise
con/HelpRec
rec
Alice0
bandwidth (B)
Bob0
bandwidth (B)
Alice1
median
average
median
average
median
average
median
average
median
average
median
average
median
average
median
average
ZarZar
26864
27449
28368
28447
20876
20909
5760
5786
10920
10990
133646
135550
928
196478
197840
1280
48248
48332
NewHope
56056
56255
59356
59413
33100
33112
15180
15165
10516
10515
249476
250264
1824
386248
387104
2048
84880
84940
Table 18: Benchmark of ZarZar and NewHope. Numbers in the table are median and average of
cpu cycles.
We run benchmark of ZarZar and NewHope on Ubuntu Linux 16.04, GCC 5.4.0, Intel Core
i7-4712MQ 2.30GHz, with hyperthreading and TurboBoost disabled. The benchmark result (Table 18) shows that ZarZar essentially outperforms NewHope.
11.3
Error Rate Analysis
In this section, we propose a delicate analysis of the error probability. From the depiction of the
protocol, we know that σ 1 − σ 2 = y2 x1 − (y1 x2 + eσ ) = e2 x1 − e1 x2 − eσ .
Claim 11.1. If e is a real random variable subjected to Gaussian of variance σ 2 , then Pr[|e | >
10σ] < 2−70 .
We can bound the last term eσ by the Claim 11.1. For other terms, we divide the 512
coefficients of the polynomial σ 1 and σ 2 into 64 groups by the same way in Section 11. From
Theorem 11.1, we only need to calculate the distribution of k(e2 x1 − e1 x2 )k kq,2 for every k.
We shall make use of the symmetry of multidimensional continual Gaussian to derive a simple
form of the distribution of k(e2 x1 − e1 x2 )k k2q,2 , and then calculate the distribution numerically
by computer programs. One may assume n is large enough to use the central limit theorem. The
comparison of our numerical method result and the error probability obatined by central limit
theorem is shown in Figure 9.
50
Figure 9: Comparison of the probability estimated by our method and the error probability
obtained by central limit theorem.
Theorem 11.2. For two polynomials f (x), g(x) ∈ Zq [x]/(x512 + 1), we can represent f (x) as
f (x) = f0 (x64 ) + f1 (x64 )x + · · · + f63 (x64 )x63 , where fi (x)(i = 0, 1, . . . , 63) are in R. g(x) can be
represented in the same way as g(x) = g0 (x64 )+g1 (x64 )x+· · ·+g63 (x64 )x63 . Let h(x) = f (x)g(x),
and h(x) is represented as h(x) = h0 (x64 ) + h1 (x64 )x + · · · + h63 (x64 )x63 . Then we have
X
X
hk (x) =
fi (x)gj (x) +
fi (x)gj (x)x
(10)
i+j=k
i+j=k+64
P
Proof. We have f (x)g(x) = i,j fi (x64 )gj (x64 )xi+j . For each (i, j) such that i + j < 64, the term
fi (x64 )gj (x64 ) is added into hi+j (x64 ). For each (i, j) such that i + j ≥ 64, we have i + j − 64 < 64,
64
64
64 )x64 is added
and fi (x64 )gj (x64 )xi+j = fi (x64 )gj (x64 )xi+j−64
the term
P x . Hence,
P fi (x )gj (x 64
64
64
64
64
into hi+j−64 (x ). Now we derive hk (x ) = i+j=k fi (x )gj (x )+ i+j=k+64 fi (x )gj (x64 )x64 .
By applying Theorem 11.2 to the polynomial e2 x1 − x2 e1 , we know that for every fixed k,
there are ai (x), bi (x) ∈ R, i =
P1, 2, . . . , 128 whose coefficients are subjected to rounded Gaussian,
such that (e2 x1 − x2 e1 )k = 128
i=1 ai (x)bi (x).
Theorem 11.3. If ai (x), bi (x), i = 1, 2, . . . , 128 are polynomials in KR whose coefficients are
drawn from continues Gaussian of variance σ 2 independently, then the following two distributions
are identical.
51
•
2
P128
in
i=1 ai (x)bi (x) , where the 2-norm
2
R8 , and take the 2-norm in R8 .
here refers to treat the polynomials in KR as a vector
P
• 4σ 4 4i=1 xi yi , where xi are drawn from chi-square distribution χ2 (256) independently, and
yi are drawn from χ2 (2) independently.
To prove this theorem, we introduce the canonical embedding, which is a commonly used
tool in ideal lattice analysis. The canonical embedding σ is a map from KR to C8 , defined as
i ), and ω
16
σ(f ) = (σi (f ))i∈Z∗16 , where σi (f ) = f (ω16
16 ∈ C is the root of equation x − 1 = 0. Note
that σ(f ) is essentially the Fourier transformation of the coefficients of the polynomial f . Let
denote the component-wise multiplication over C8 . Then σ is a ring homomorphism. In addition,
one half of σi is the complex conjugation of the other half, i.e. σi (f ) = σ16−i (f ). If we constrain
σ on the first half, i.e. (σi )i∈Z∗16 ,i≤8 ∈ C4 , and regard C4 as a real space R8 , then σ is a scaled
rotation.
Proof of Theorem 11.3. From the scaling property and the homomorphism property of σ, we have
128
X
i=1
2
ai (x)bi (x)
128
X
1
σ
=
ai (x)bi (x)
8
!
i=1
1
=
4
X
128
X
σj (ai )
2
128
1 X
=
σ(ai )
8
2
σ(bi )
(11)
i=1
2
σj (bi )
(12)
j∈Z∗16 ,i≤8 i=1
The last equality comes from the complex conjugation property of σj . As σ is a rotation, it transforms a Gaussian to a Gaussian. Hence, σj (ai ), j ∈ Z∗16 are subjected to Gaussian of deviation
2σ, and are indepedent.
P128
σj (bi ) is subjected to a 2-dimensional
Then, conditioned on bP
i , i = 1...128,
i=1 σj (ai )
2 . This deviation is subjected to (2σ)4 χ2 (256). Note that
|σ
(b
)|
Gaussian of variance (2σ)2 128
i=1 j i
the Gaussian of variance (2σ)4 χ2 (256) can be generated by multiplying the standard deviation
2
P128
to the standard Gaussian. Hence,
σj (bi ) is subjected to (2σ)4 xj yj , where xj
i=1 σj (ai )
are subjected to χ2 (256) independently, and yj are the squared norm of the Gaussian, which are
subjected to χ2 (2).
P
By Theorem 11.3, we only need to numerically calculate the distribution of 4i=1 xi yi , where
xi ’s are subjected to χ2 (256) and yi ’s are taken from χ2 (2) independently.
We design a numerical algorithm to calculate the distribution. In detail, we use discretization
to transform the χ2 -distribution into discrete distribution. Then we represent the discrete distributions as dictionaries, which are denote as distr1 , distr2 and distr in the following.
• discretization(m, s) outputs a dictionary that represent the distribution of sbχ2 (m)/se.
• multiply(distr1 , distr2 ) outputs a dictionary that represent the distribution of x · y, where
x is subjected to distribution distr1 and y is subjected to distribution distr2 .
• add(distr1 , distr2 ) outputs a dictionary that represent the distribution of x + y, where x is
subjected to distribution distr1 and y is subjected to distribution distr2 .
52
• merge(distr, s) outputs a dictionary that represent the distribution of sbx/se, where x is
subjected to the discrete distribution distr. This subroutine is used to reduce the number
of entries in the dictionary distr, and thus speeds up the calculation.
This four subroutines are straightforwardly implemented. discretization need to uses the cumulative function of the distribution of χ2 . This function can be numerically calculated preciously
and is provided by many open libraries.
Algorithm 19 Calculate the distribution of
1: distrχ2 (256) ← discretization(256, 0.1)
2: distrχ2 (2) ← discretization(2, 0.02)
3: distr ← multiply(distrχ2 (2) , distrχ2 (256) )
4: distr ← merge(distr, 4)
5: distr ← add(distr, distr)
6: distr ← add(distr, distr)
P4
i=1 xi yi
Theorem 11.4.
P4Let distr be the distribution outputed by Algorithm 19. For every positive real
number T , Pr[ i=1 xi yi > T ] < Pr[distr > T − 64].
Proof. We analyze the errors of each of the four operations. multiply and add have no truncation
errors. For discretization and merge, we have |x − sbx/se| = s|x/s − bx/se| < s/2. Let edxi , edyi be
the errors produced by discretization, and em
k be the errors produced by merge. Then we have
3
X
((xi +
i=0
edxi )(yi
+
edyi )
+
em
k )
−
3
X
i=0
x i yi ≤
3
X
i=0
|edxi |yi + |edyi |xi + |edxi edyi | + |em
k |
In our Algorithm 19, we have |edyi | < 0.01 and |edxi | < 0.1. In addition, Pr[xi > 600] < 2−180 and
Pr[yi > 150] < 2−190 . So we can simply assume xi < 600 and yi < 150. Hence, the right hand
side is less than 4 · (600 · 0.01 + 150 · 0.05 + 0.01 · 0.05 + 2) < 64.
Claim 11.2. For n = 512, σ 2 = 22, g = 26 , the over all error probability of the scheme is less
than 2−58 .
Proof. From Claim 11.1 and
√ Theorem 11.1, we need to calculate the probability of k(e2 x1 −
e1 x2 )k kq,2 > (q
P− 1)/2 − 2(q/g − 1) − 10σ > 5824. From Theorem 11.3, this equals to the
probability of 3i=0 xi yi > 58242 /(4 · 222 ) = 17520. From Theorem 11.4, this probability is less
than Pr[distr > 17520 − 64 = 17456]. The computer program numerically calculates Pr[distr >
17456] < 2−64.6 . We use the union bound to derive the over all error probability is less than
64 · 2−64.6 < 2−58 .
References
[ACPS09] Benny Applebaum, David Cash, Chris Peikert, and Amit Sahai. Fast Cryptographic Primitives and Circular-Secure Encryption Based on Hard Learning Problems. CRYPTO 2009: 595-618.
53
[ADPS16] Erdem Alkim, Léo Ducas, Thomas Pöppelmann, and Peter Schwabe. Post-quantum
Key Exchange — A New Hope. 25th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security
16), pages 327–343.
[ADPS16b] Erdem Alkim, Léo Ducas, Thomas Pppelmann, and Peter Schwabe. NewHope without Reconciliation. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/1157, 2016. http:
//eprint.iacr.org/2016/1157
[AG11]
Sanjeev Arora and Rong Ge. New Algorithms for Learning in Presence of Errors.
ICALP 2011: 403-415.
[AJS16]
Erdem Alkim, Philipp Jakubeit, and Peter Schwabe. A New Hope on ARM CortexM. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/758, 2016. http://eprint.iacr.org/
2016/758.
[APS15]
Martin R. Albrecht, Rachel Player and Sam Scott. On the Concrete Hardness of
Learning with Errors. Journal of Mathematical Cryptology, Volume 9, Issue 3, pages
169-203, 2015.
[BGM+ 16] Andrej Bogdanov, Siyao Guo, Daniel Masny, Silas Richelson, and Alon Rosen. On
the Hardness of Learning with Rounding over Small Modulus. TCC 2016: 209-224.
[BCD+ 16] Joppe Bos, Craig Costello, Lo Ducas, Ilya Mironov, Michael Naehrig, Valeria Nikolaenko, Ananth Raghunathan, and Douglas Stebila. Frodo: Take off the Ring! Practical, Quantum-Secure Key Exchange from LWE. ACM CCS 2016: 1006-1018.
[BCNS15] Joppe W. Bos, Craig Costello, Michael Naehrig, and Douglas Stebila. Post-Quantum
Key Exchange for the TLS Protocol from the Ring Learning with Errors Problem.
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015, pages 553-570.
[BLL+ 15]
Shi Bai, Adeline Langlois, Tancrède Lepoint, Damien Stehlé, and Ron Steinfeld. Improved Security Proofs in Lattice-Based Cryptography: Using the Rényi Divergence
rather than the Statistical Distance. ASIACRYPT 2015: 3-24.
[BPR12]
Abhishek Banerjee and Chris Peikert and Alon Rosen. Pseudorandom Functions and
Lattices. EUROCRYPT 2012: 719-737.
[CESG]
CESG. Quantum key distribution: A CESG white paper, 2016. https://www.cesg.
gov.uk/white-papers/quantum-key-distribution.
[CN11]
Yuanmi Chen and Phong Q. Nguyen. BKZ 2.0: Better Lattice Security Estimates.
ASIACRYPT 2011: 1-20.
[CKLS16] J.H. Cheon, D. Kim, Joohee Lee, and Y. Song. Lizard: Cut Off the Tail! Practical Post-Quantum Public-Key Encryption from LWE and LWR. Cryptology ePrint
Archive, Report 2016/1126, 2016. http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1126.
[CW90]
Don Coppersmith and Shmuel Winograd. Matrix Multiplication via Arithmetic Progressions. Journal of Symbolic Computation, volume 9, issue 3, pages 251-280, 1990.
[DD12]
Léo Ducas and Alain Durmus. Ring-LWE in Polynomial Rings. PKC 2012: 34-51.
54
[DTV15]
Alexandre Duc, Florian Tramèr, and Serge Vaudenay. Better Algorithms for LWE
and LWR. EUROCRYPT 2015: 173-202.
[DORS08] Yevgeniy Dodis, Rafail Ostrovsky, Leonid Reyzin, and Adam Smith Fuzzy Extractors:
How to Generate Strong Keys from Biometrics and Other Noisy Data. SIAM Journal
on Computing, volume 38, issue 1, pages 97-139, 2008.
[FO99]
Eiichiro Fujisaki and Tatsuaki Okamoto. How to Enhance the Security of Public-Key
Encryption at Minimum Cost. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics,
Communications and Computer Sciences Volume 83, Issue 1, pages 24-32, 1999.
[FO13]
Eiichiro Fujisaki and Tatsuaki Okamoto. Secure Integration of Asymmetric and Symmetric Encryption Schemes. Journal of Cryptology, Volume 26, Issue 1, pages 80-101,
2013.
[GPV08]
Craig Gentry, Chris Peikert, and Vinod Vaikuntanathan. Trapdoors for Hard Lattices
and New Cryptographic Constructions. ACM STOC 2008: 197-206.
[GS16]
Shay Gueron and Fabian Schlieker. Speeding Up R-LWE Post-Quantum Key Exchange. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/467, 2016. http://eprint.iacr.
org/2016/467.
[JD12]
Xiaodong Lin Jintai Ding, Xiang Xie. A Simple Provably Secure Key Exchange
Scheme Based on the Learning with Errors Problem. Cryptology ePrint Archive,
Report 2012/688, 2012. http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/688.
[KLL15]
M. Kaplan, G. Leurent, A. Leverrier and M. Naya-Plasencia. Quantum Differential
and Linear Cryptanalysis. ArXiv Preprint: 1510.05836, 2015. http://arxiv.org/
abs/1510.05836.
[KF15]
Paul Kirchner and Pierre-Alain Fouque. An Improved BKW Algorithm for LWE with
Applications to Cryptography and Lattices. CRYPTO 2015: 43-62.
[Kra03]
Hugo Krawczyk. SIGMA: The ‘SIGn-and-MAc’ Approach to Authenticated DiffieHellman and Its Use in the IKE Protocols CRYPTO 2003: 400-425.
[KM10]
H. Kuwakado and M. Morii. Quantum Distinguisher between the 3-round Feistel
Cipher and the Random Permutation. IEEE ISIT 2010: 2682-2685.
[LP10]
Richard Lindner and Chris Peikert. Better Key Sizes (and Attacks) for LWE-Based
Encryption. CT-RSA 2011: 319-339. Also available from http://eprint.iacr.org/
2010/613.
[LPR13a]
Vadim Lyubashevsky, Chris Peikert, and Oded Regev. On Ideal Lattices and Learning
with Errors over Rings. EUROCRYPT 2010: 1-23.
[LPR13b]
Vadim Lyubashevsky, Chris Peikert, and Oded Regev. A Toolkit for Ring-LWE
Cryptography. EUROCRYPT 2013: 35-54.
[Mat]
Braithwaite Matt. Experimenting with Post-Quantum Cryptography. Posting
on the Google Security Blog, 2016. https://security.googleblog.com/2016/07/
experimenting-with-post-quantum.html.
55
[MP13]
Daniele Micciancio and Chris Peikert. Hardness of SIS and LWE with Small Parameters. CRYPTO 2013: 21-39.
[Nic]
Mathewson Nick.
Cryptographic Directions in Tor.
Slides of a talk at
Real-World Crypto 2016, 2016. https://people.torproject.org/~nickm/slides/
nickm-rwc-presentation.pdf.
[NIS]
NIST. Post-Quantum Crypto Project. 2016. http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/
post-quantum-crypto/index.html.
[NSA]
NSA. NSA Suite B Cryptography. https://www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/suiteb_
cryptography.
[Pei14]
Chris Peikert. Lattice Cryptography for the Internet. PQCrypto 2014: 197-219.
[Pei16]
Chris Peikert. A Decade of Lattice Cryptography. In Foundations and Trends in
Theoretical Computer Science, Volume 10, Issue 4, pages 283-424, 2016.
[PVW08]
Chris Peikert, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, and Brent Waters. A Framework for Efficient
and Composable Oblivious Transfer. CRYPTO 2008: 554-571.
[PG13]
Thomas Pöppelmann and Tim Güneysu. Towards Practical Lattice-Based Public-Key
Encryption on Reconfigurable Hardware. SAC 2013: 68-85.
[Pop16]
Alex van Poppelen, Cryptographic Decoding of the Leech Lattice. Cryptology ePrint
Archive, Report 2016/1050, 2016. http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1050.
[Reg09]
Oded Regev. On Lattices, Learning with Errors, Random Linear Codes, and Cryptography. Journal of the ACM (JACM), Volume 56, Issue 6, pages 34, 2009.
[Res]
Eric Rescorla. The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3.
[SE94]
C. P. Schnorr and M. Euchner. Lattice Basis Reduction: Improved Practical Algorithms and Solving Subset Sum Problems. Mathematical Programming, Volume 66,
Issue 2, pages 181-199, Springer, 1994.
[Sim02]
Marvin K. Simon. Probability Distributions Involving Gaussian Random Variables :
A Handbook for Engineers and Scientists. Springer, 2012.
[Str69]
Volker Strassen. Gaussian Elimination is not Optimal. Numerische Mathematik,
Volume 13, Issue 4, pages 354-356, Springer, 1969.
[SM16]
Douglas Stebila and Michele Mosca. Post-Quantum Key Exchange for the Internet
and the Open Quantum Safe Project. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/1017,
2016. http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1017.
[TU15]
E. E. Targhi and D. Unruh. Quantum Security of the Fujisaki-Okamoto and OAEP
Transforms. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/1210, 2015. http://eprint.
iacr.org/2015/1210.
56
A
Consensus Mechanism of Frodo
Let the modulo q be power of 2, which can be generalized to arbitrary modulo using the techniques
in [Pei14]. Let integer B be a power of 2. B < (log q) − 1, B̄ = (log q) − B (note that m = 2B in
our notations). The underlying KC mechanism implicitly in Frodo is presented in Figure 20.
Algorithm 20 Key consensus scheme in Frodo
1: procedure
j Con(σ
k 1 , params)
−
B̄+1
2:
v= 2
σ1 mod 2
j
m
3:
k1 = 2−B̄ σ1 mod 2B
4:
return (k1 , v)
5: end procedure
6: procedure Rec(σ2 , v, params) j
k
7:
find x ∈ Zq closest to σ2 s.t. 2−B̄+1 x mod 2 = v
j
m
8:
k2 = 2−B̄ x mod 2B
9:
return k2
10: end procedure
. σ1 ∈ [0, q)
. σ2 ∈ [0, q)
Claim A.1 ( [BCD+ 16], Claim 3.2). If |σ1 − σ2 |q < 2B̄−2 , then Rec(σ2 , v) = k1 . i.e. the scheme
in Algorithm 20 is correct.
This claim is equivalence to require 4md < q.
B
Consensus Mechanism of NewHope
Note that, for the consensus mechanism of NewHope, the rec procedure is run both in Con and
in Rec, and a random bit b is used in Con corresponding to the dbl trick in [Pei14].
57
Algorithm 21 NewHope Consensus Mechanism
1: procedure Decode(x ∈ R4 /Z4 )
. Return a bit k such that kg is closest to x + Z4
2:
v = x − bxe
3:
return k = 0 if kvk1 ≤ 1, and 1 otherwise
4: end procedure
5:
r
2
6: HelpRec(x, b) = CVPD̃
(x
+
bg)
mod 2r
. b corresponds to the dbl trick [Pei14]
q
4
7: rec x ∈ Z4q , v ∈ Z42r = Decode 1q x − 21r Bv
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
procedure Con(σ 1 ∈ Z4q , params)
b ← {0, 1}
v ← HelpRec(σ 1 , b)
k1 ← rec(σ 1 , v)
return (k1 , v)
end procedure
15:
procedure Rec(σ 2 ∈ Z4q , v ∈ Z42r , params)
17:
k2 ← rec(σ 2 , v)
18: end procedure
16:
19:
C
Security Analysis of LWE-Based Key Exchange
Definition C.1. A KC or AKC based key exchange protocol from LWE is secure, if for any
sufficiently large security parameter λ and any PPT adversary A, Pr[b0 = b] − 12 is negligible,
as defined w.r.t. game G0 specified in Algorithm 22.
Algorithm 22 Game G0
1: A ← Zn×n
q
2: X1 , E1 ← χn×lA
3: Y1 = AX1 + E1
4: X2 , E2 ← χn×lB
5: Y2 = AT X2 + E2
6: Eσ ← χlA ×lB
7: Σ2 = Y1T X2 + Eσ
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , bY2 /2t c, Kb2 , V)
Before starting to prove the security, we first recall some basic properties of the LWE assumption. The following lemma is derived by a direct hybrid argument [PVW08, BCD+ 16].
Lemma C.1 (LWE in the matrix form). For positive integer parameters (λ, n, q ≥ 2, l, t), where
(l,t)
n, q, l, t all are polynomial in λ, and a distribution χ over Zq , denote by Lχ the distribution over
t×n
t×l
t×n
n×l
t×l
Zq × Zq generated by taking A ← Zq , S ← χ , E ← χ
and outputting (A, AS + E).
58
Then, under the standard LWE assumption on indistinguishability between Aq,s,χ (with s ← χn )
and U(Znq × Zq ), no PPT distinguisher D can distinguish, with non-negligible probability, between
(l,t)
the distribution Lχ
and U(Zt×n
× Zt×l
q
q ) for sufficiently large λ.
Theorem C.1. If (params, Con, Rec) is a correct and secure KC or AKC scheme, the key exchange protocol described in Figure 4 is secure under the (matrix form of ) LWE assumption.
Proof. The proof is similar to, but actually simpler than, that in [Pei14, BCD+ 16]. The general
idea is that we construct a sequence of games: G0 , G1 and G2 , where G0 is the original game for
defining security. In every move from game Gi to Gi+1 , 0 ≤ i ≤ 1, we change a little. All games
Gi ’s share the same PPT adversary A, whose goal is to distinguish between the matrices chosen
uniformly at random and the matrices generated in the actual key exchange protocol. Denote by
Ti , 0 ≤ i ≤ 2, the event that b = b0 in Game Gi . Our goal is to prove that Pr[T0 ] < 1/2 + negl,
where negl is a negligible function in λ. For ease of readability, we re-produce game G0 below.
For presentation simplicity, in the subsequent analysis, we always assume the underlying KC or
AKC is correct. The proof can be trivially extended to the case that correctness holds with
overwhelming probability (i.e., failure occurs with negligible probability).
Algorithm 23 Game G0
1: A ← Zn×n
q
2: X1 , E1 ← χn×lA
3: Y1 = AX1 + E1
4: X2 , E2 ← χn×lB
5: Y2 = AT X2 + E2
6: Eσ ← χlA ×lB
7: Σ2 = Y1T X2 + Eσ
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , bY2 /2t c, Kb2 , V)
Algorithm 24 Game G1
1: A ← Zn×n
q
2: X1 , E1 ← χn×lA
A
3: Y1 ← Zn×l
q
4: X2 , E2 ← χn×lB
5: Y2 = AT X2 + E2
6: Eσ ← χlA ×lB
7: Σ2 = Y1T X2 + Eσ
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
A ×lB
9: K12 ← Zlm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , bY2 /2t c, Kb2 , V)
(l ,n)
Lemma C.2. | Pr[T0 ]−Pr[T1 ]| < negl, under the indistinguishability between Lχ A
A ).
Zn×l
q
(l ,n)
Proof. Construct a distinguisher D, in Algorithm 25, who tries to distinguish Lχ A
A ).
Zn×l
q
59
and U(Zn×n
×
q
from U(Zn×n
×
q
Algorithm 25 Distinguisher D
1: procedure D(A, B)
2:
Y1 = B
3:
X2 , E2 ← χn×lB
4:
Y2 = AT X2 + E2
5:
Eσ ← χlA ×lB
6:
Σ2 = Y1T X2 + Eσ
7:
K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
8:
K12 ← Zm
9:
b ← {0, 1}
10:
b0 ← A(A, Y1 , bY2 /2t c, Kb2 , V)
11:
if b0 = b then
12:
return 1
13:
else
14:
return 0
15:
end if
16: end procedure
(l ,n)
If (A, B) is subject to Lχ A
A
. A ∈ Zn×n
, B ∈ Zn×l
q
q
h
i
(l ,n)
, then D perfectly simulates G0 . Hence, Pr D Lχ A
=1 =
Pr[T0 ]. On the other hand, if (A, B) is chosen uniformly at random from Zn×n
×Zqn×lA , which are
q
denoted as (AU , BU ), then D perfectly simulates G1 . So, Pr[D(AU , BU ) = 1] = Pr[T1 ]. Hence,
(l ,n)
|Pr[T0 ] − Pr[T1 ]| = Pr[D(Lχ A ) = 1] − Pr[D(AU , BU ) = 1] < negl.
Algorithm 26 Game G1
1: A ← Zn×n
q
2: X1 , E1 ← χn×lA
A
3: Y1 ← Zn×l
q
4: X2 , E2 ← χn×lB
5: Y2 = AT X2 + E2
6: Eσ ← χlA ×lB
7: Σ2 = Y1T X2 + Eσ
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , bY2 /2t c, Kb2 , V)
Algorithm 27 Game G2
1: A ← Zqn×n
2: X1 , E1 ← χn×lA
A
3: Y1 ← Zn×l
q
4: X2 , E2 ← χn×lB
B
5: Y2 ← Zn×l
q
l
×l
A
B
6: Eσ ← χ
l
×l
7: Σ2 ← ZqA B
8: K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
9: K12 ← Zm
10: b ← {0, 1}
11: b0 ← A(A, Y1 , bY2 /2t c, Kb2 , V)
(l ,n+lA )
Lemma C.3. | Pr[T1 ] − Pr[T2 ]| < negl, under the indistinguishability between Lχ B
(n+l )×n
(n+l )×l
U(Zq A
× Zq A B ).
and
(l ,l )
Proof. As Y1 is subject to uniform distribution in G1 , (Y1T , Σ2 ) can be regarded as an Lχ B A
sample of secret X2 and noise Eσ . Based on this observation, we construct the following distinguisher D0 .
60
Algorithm 28 Distinguisher D0
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
(n+lA )×n
procedure D0 (A0 , B) where
A0 ∈ Zq
T
A
Denote A0 =
Y1T
Y2
Denote B =
Σ2
K02 , V ← Con(Σ2 , params)
lA ×lB
K12 ← Zm
b ← {0, 1}
b0 ← A(A, Y1 , bY2 /2t c, Kb2 , V)
if b0 = b then
return 1
else
return 0
end if
end procedure
(l ,n+l )
(n+lA )×lB
, B ∈ Zq
. A ∈ Zqn×n , Y1T ∈ ZlqA ×n
. Y2 ∈ Zqn×lB , Σ2 ∈ ZlqA ×lB
(n+l )×n
A
A
and Y1 ← Zn×l
If (A0 , B) is subject to Lχ B
, A0 ← Zq A
corresponds to A ← Zn×n
q
q
in G1 ; and S ← χn×lB (resp., E ← χ(n+lA )×lB ) in generating (A0 , B) corresponds to X2 ← χn×lB
(resp., E2 ← χn×lB and Eσ ← χlA ×lB ) in G1 . In this case, we have
T
E2
A
X
+
B = A0 S + E =
2
Eσ
Y1T
T
A X 2 + E2
Y2
=
=
T
Y1 X2 + Eσ
Σ2
i
h
(l ,n+lA )
= 1 = Pr[T1 ].
Hence Pr D0 Lχ B
(n+l )×n
(n+l )×l
On the other hand, if (A0 , B) is subject to uniform distribution U(Zq A
× Zq A B ),
then A, Y1 , Y2 , Σ2 all are also uniformly random; So, the view of D0 in this case is the same
as that in game G2 . Hence, Pr [D0 (A0 , B) = 1] = Pr[T2 ] in this case. Then | Pr[T1 ] − Pr[T2 ]| =
(l ,n+lA )
(n+l )×n
(n+l )×l
| Pr[D0 (Lχ B
) = 1] − Pr[D0 (U(Zq A
× Zq A B )) = 1]| < negl.
Lemma C.4. If the underlying KC or AKC is secure, Pr[T 2] = 12 .
Proof. Note that, in Game G2 , for any 1 ≤ i ≤ lA and 1 ≤ j ≤ lB , K02 [i, j], V[i, j] only depends
on Σ2 [i, j], and Σ2 is subject to uniform distribution. By the security of KC, we have that, for
each pair (i, j), K02 [i, j] and V[i, j] are independent, and K02 [i, j] is uniform distributed. Hence,
K02 and V are independent, and K02 is uniformly distributed, which implies that Pr[T2 ] = 1/2.
This finishes the proof of Theorem C.1.
D
D.1
Construction and Analysis of AKCN-4:1
Overview of NewHope
By extending the technique of [PG13], in NewHope the coefficients of σ 1 (i.e., the polynomial of
degree n) are divided into n/4 groups, where each group contains four coordinates. On the input
61
of four coordinates, only one bit (rather than four bits) consensus is reached, which reduces the
error probability to about 2−61 which is viewed to be negligible in practice.
Specifically, suppose Alice and Bob have σ 1 and σ 2 in Z4q respectively, and they are close
to each other. One can regard the two vectors as elements in R4 /Z4 , by treating them as 1q σ 1
and 1q σ 2 . Consider the matrix B = (u0 , u1 , u2 , g) ∈ R4×4 , where ui , 0 ≤ i ≤ 2, is the canonical
unit vector whose i-th coordinate is 1, and g = (1/2, 1/2, 1/2, 1/2)T . Denote by D̃4 the lattice
generated by B. Note that Z4 ⊂ D̃4 ⊂ R4 . Denote by V the close Voronoi cell of the origin in
D̃4 . In fact, V is the intersection of the unit ball in norm 1 and the unit ball in infinity norm
(the reader is referred to NewHope [ADPS16, Appendix C] for details). The following procedure
CVPD̃4 (x) returns the vector v such that Bv is closest to x, i.e., x ∈ Bv + V, where the distance
is measured in the Euclidean norm.
Algorithm 29 CVPD̃4 in NewHope [ADPS16]
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
procedure CVPD̃4 (x ∈ R4 )
v0 = bxe
v1 = bx − ge
k = 0 if kx − v0 k1 < 1 and 1 otherwise
(v0 , v1 , v2 , v3 )T = vk
return v = (v0 , v1 , v2 , k)T + v3 · (−1, −1, −1, 2)T
end procedure
If σ 1 is in the Voronoi cell of g, then the consensus bit is set to be 1, and 0 otherwise.
Hence, Alice finds the closest lattice vector of σ 1 by running the CVPD̃4 procedure described in
Algorithm 29, and calculates their difference which is set to be the hint signal v. Upon receiving
v, Bob subtracts the difference from σ 2 . Since σ 1 and σ 2 are very close, the subtraction moves
1
q σ 2 towards a lattice point in D̃4 . Then Bob checks whether or not the point after the move
is in the Voronoi cell of g, and so the consensus is reached. Furthermore, to save bandwidth,
NewHope chooses an integer r, and discretizes the Voronoi cell of g to 24r blocks, so that only
4r bits are needed to transfer the hint information. To make the distribution of consensus bit
uniform, NewHope adds a small noise to σ 1 , similar to the dbl trick used in [Pei14]. The Con
and Rec procedures, distilled from NewHope, are presented in Algorithm 21 in Appendix B.
D.2
Construction and Analysis of AKCN-4:1
For any integer q and vector x = (x0 , x1 , x2 , x3 )T ∈ Z4q , denote by kxkq,1 the sum |x0 |q + |x1 |q +
|x2 |q +|x3 |q . For two vectors a = (a0 , a1 , a2 , a3 )T , b = (b0 , b1 , b2 , b3 )T ∈ Z4 , let a mod b denote the
vector (a0 mod b0 , a1 mod b1 , a2 mod b2 , a3 mod b3 )T ∈ Z4 . The scheme of AKCN-4:1 is presented
in Algorithm 30.
Compared with the consensus mechanism of NewHope presented in Appendix B, AKCN-4:1
can be simpler and computationally more efficient. In specific, the uniformly random bit b used in
NewHope (corresponding the dbl trick in [Pei14]) is eliminated with AKCN-4:1, which saves 256
(resp., 1024) random bits in total when reaching 256 (resp., 1024) consensus bits. In addition, as
k1 , as well as k1 (q + 1)g, can be offline computed and used (e.g., for encryption, in parallel with
the protocol run), AKCN-4:1 enjoys online/offline speeding-up and parallel computing.
Theorem D.1. If kσ 1 − σ 2 kq,1 < q 1 − g1 − 2, then the AKCN-4:1 scheme depicted in Algorithm 30 is correct.
62
Proof. Suppose v0 = CVPD̃4 (g(σ 1 + k1 (q + 1)g)/q). Then, v = v0 mod (g, g, g, 2g), and so
there exits θ = (θ0 , θ1 , θ2 , θ3 ) ∈ Z4 such that v = v0 + g(θ0 , θ1 , θ2 , 2θ3 )T . From the formula
calculating v0 , we know there exits ∈ V, such that g(σ 1 + k1 (q + 1)g)/q = + Bv0 . Hence,
Bv0 = g(σ 1 + k1 (q + 1)g)/q − .
From the formula computing x in Rec, we have x = Bv/g − σ 2 /q = Bv0 /g − σ 2 /q +
B(θ0 , θ1 , θ2 , 2θ3 )T = k1 g + k1 g/q − /g + (σ 1 − σ 2 )/q + B(θ0 , θ1 , θ2 , 2θ3 )T . Note that the last
term B(θ0 , θ1 , θ2 , 2θ3 )T ∈ Z4 , and in line 7 of Algorithm 30 we subtract bxe ∈ Z4 from x, so the
difference between x − bxe and k1 g in norm 1 is no more than 2/q + 1/g + kσ 1 − σ 2 kq,1 /q < 1.
Hence, k2 = k1 .
Algorithm 30 AKCN-4:1
1: procedure Con(σ 1 ∈ Z4q , k1 ∈ {0, 1}, params)
2:
v = CVPD̃4 (g(σ 1 + k1 (q + 1)g)/q) mod (g, g, g, 2g)T
3:
return v
4: end procedure
5: procedure Rec(σ 2 ∈ Z4q , v ∈ Z3g × Z2g , params)
6:
x = Bv/g − σ 2 /q
7:
return k2 = 0 if kx − bxek1 < 1, 1 otherwise.
8: end procedure
Theorem D.2. AKCN-4:1 depicted in Algorithm 30 is secure. Specifically, if σ 1 is subject to
uniform distribution over Z4q , then v and k1 are independent.
Proof. Let y = (σ 1 + k1 (q + 1)g) mod q ∈ Z4q . First we prove that y is independent of k1 , when
σ 1 ← Z4q . Specifically, for arbitrary ỹ ∈ Z4q and arbitrary k̃1 ∈ {0, 1}, we want to prove that
Pr[y = ỹ | k1 = k̃1 ] = Pr[σ 1 = (ỹ − k1 (q + 1)g) mod q | k1 = k̃1 ] = 1/q 4 . Hence, y and k1 are
independent.
For simplicity, denote by G the vector (g, g, g, 2g). Map φ : Z4 → Z3g × Z2g is defined
by φ(w) = CVPD̃4 (gw/q) mod G. We shall prove that, for any θ ∈ Z4 , φ(w + qθ) = φ(w). By
definition of φ, φ(w+qθ) = CVPD̃4 (gw/q+gθ) mod G. Taking x = gw/q+gθ into Algorithm 29,
we have CVPD̃4 (gw/q + gθ) = CVPD̃4 (gw/q) + B−1 (gθ). It is easy to check that the last term
B−1 (gθ) always satisfies B−1 (gθ) mod G = 0.
From the above property of φ, we have φ(y) = φ((σ 1 + k1 (q + 1)g) mod q) = φ(σ 1 + k1 (q +
1)g) = v. As k1 is independent of y, and v only depends on y, k1 and v are independent.
E
Implementing HxT in SEC with Simple Bit Operations
uint16_t getCode ( uint16_t x )
{
uint16_t c , p ;
c = ( x >> 4) ^ x ;
c = ( c >> 2) ^ c ;
p = (( c >> 1) ^ c ) & 1;
x = ( x >> 8) ^ x ;
c = ( x >> 2) ^ x ;
63
p
x
p
x
p
=
=
=
=
=
((( c >> 1) ^ c ) & 1) | ( p << 1) ;
( x >> 4) ^ x ;
((( x >> 1) ^ x ) & 1) | ( p << 1) ;
( x >> 2) ^ x ;
( x & 1) | ( p << 1) ;
return p ;
}
Listing 1: An implementation of HxT with C language
F
A Note on Lizard
We note that the CPA-secure PKE scheme, Lizard, proposed in [CKLS16] is actually instantiated
from our AKCN scheme presented in Algorithm 4, where the two close values are derived from
generating and exchanging spLWE and spLWR samples in an asymmetric way. Specifically, the
public key is generated with spLWE samples, while ciphertext is generated with spLWR samples.
However, the underlying AKC mechanism in the spLWE/spLWR based PKE scheme analyzed
in [CKLS16] is actually an instantiation of our AKCN scheme for the special case of m|g|q, where
g (resp., m) in AKCN corresponds to p (resp., t) in [CKLS16].
Let Xn,ρ,θ denote the set containing all n dimension vectors that have exactly θ non-zero
components, and each non-zero component is in {±1, ±2, . . . , ±ρ}. spLWE problem is the LWE
problem whose secret vector is drawn uniformly randomly from the set Xn,ρ,θ .
64
| 7cs.IT
|
A semidefinite program for unbalanced multisection in the
stochastic block model
Amelia Perry∗1 and Alexander S. Wein†1
arXiv:1507.05605v2 [cs.DS] 2 Dec 2016
1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics
December 5, 2016
Abstract
We propose a semidefinite programming (SDP) algorithm for community detection in the
stochastic block model, a popular model for networks with latent community structure. We prove
that our algorithm achieves exact recovery of the latent communities, up to the informationtheoretic limits determined by Abbe and Sandon [AS15a]. Our result extends prior SDP approaches by allowing for many communities of different sizes. By virtue of a semidefinite approach, our algorithms succeed against a semirandom variant of the stochastic block model,
guaranteeing a form of robustness and generalization. We further explore how semirandom
models can lend insight into both the strengths and limitations of SDPs in this setting.
∗
Email: [email protected].
Email: [email protected]. This research was conducted with Government support under and awarded by DoD,
Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship, 32
CFR 168a.
†
1
Introduction
1.1
Community detection
The stochastic block model is among the most actively studied models for networks with latent
community structure. Such models lend themselves to the statistical task of recovering the community structure given a single such graph, a task known as community detection. This task
manifests itself as that of finding human communities in social networks, and that of determining sets of proteins that function together in protein–protein interaction networks; more generally,
community detection is the analogue of clustering for network data.
Since the introduction of the stochastic block model by Holland [HLL83], a wide range of
algorithmic approaches have been deployed. Such algorithms are generally compared through the
range of model parameters in which they succeed in recovering information; whether they achieve
exact recovery of the underlying community structure, or only partial recovery of community
structure correlated with the truth; and their computational efficiency.
In recent years, the block model has received a surge of interest as a meeting point of machine
learning, algorithms, and statistical mechanics. A series of conjectures by Decelle et al. [DKMZ11]
predicted a sharp threshold, separating a range of model parameters in which partial recovery
is possible from a range in which it is impossible, using non-rigorous techniques from statistical
physics. Some of these threshold effects have been proven [MNS14, Mas14], along with analogues
for exact recovery [ABH16, AS15a], and among the first algorithms to achieve exact recovery all
the way up to these thresholds were those based on the powerful algorithmic tools of semidefinite
programming (SDP). Indeed, the maximum likelihood estimation problems for block models amount
to cut problems on graphs, which have a rich history of study through SDPs (for example [GW95,
FJ94]); it is natural for these to appear among the most powerful tools for community detection.
In recent work of Abbe and Sandon [AS15a], alternative methods of spectral clustering and
local refinement have taken the lead in exact recovery, providing very general and sharp algorithmic
results. It is natural to wonder how well SDP approaches can match these results, particularly in
the light of strong robustness properties that convex programs enjoy. In this paper, we extend
the frontier of optimal results on SDPs for exact recovery to the case of multiple communities of
unequal sizes. We further address the relationship of SDPs to semirandom models, highlighting their
robustness as an advantage over spectral techniques, but also exposing how this same robustness
can pose fundamental limits to SDP approaches.
1.2
1.2.1
Models
Stochastic block model
The stochastic block model is a generative model for graphs, in which we suppose a vertex set
of size n has been partitioned into r disjoint ‘communities’ S1 , . . . , Sr . An undirected graph is
randomly generated from this hidden partition as follows: every unordered pair (u, v) of distinct
vertices is independently connected by an edge with probability Qij where u, v belong to communities i, j respectively. Here Q is a symmetric r × r matrix. Given a graph sampled from this model,
the goal is to recover the underlying partition.
Many papers specialize to the planted partition model, the case where Qii = p for all i and
Qij = q for all i 6= j. We will largely work with this specialization, and occasionally discuss the
more general model.
1
1.2.2
Semirandom models
Much work in community detection focuses on the Erdős–Rényi-style random models defined above.
These models are mathematically convenient, owing to the independence of edges, yet most realworld networks do not take this form. Moreover, there is cause for concern that some algorithms
developed for the models above are highly brittle and do not generalize to other graph models: as
illustrated in [RJM16], one spectral method with strong theoretical guarantees degrades very rapidly
when a sparse planted partition model is perturbed by adding small cliques, which are otherwise
very infrequent in this random model, but do occur frequently in many real-world graphs.
Extending beyond the random models above, Blum and Spencer [BS95] introduced the notion
of semirandom models for graph problems, as an intermediate model between average-case
and worst-case performance. The idea, extended by Feige and Kilian [FK01], is to generate a
preliminary graph according to a random model, but then allow a monotone adversary to make
unbounded, arbitrarily structured changes of a nature that should only help the algorithm by
further revealing the ground truth. Although these changes may seem to make the problem easier,
they may significantly alter the distribution of observations revealed to the algorithm, breaking
statistical assumptions made about the observations. Semirandom models are thus a means of
penalizing brittle algorithms that are over-tuned to particular random models. Semirandom models
are no easier than their random counterparts, as the adversary may opt to make no changes.
Following [FK01], we define the semirandom planted partition model as follows. A graph
is first generated according to the planted partition model, and then a monotone adversary may
arbitrarily add edges within communities, and remove edges between communities. The semirandom model can simulate aspects of real-world graphs and other graph models, such as a wide range
of degree or subgraph profiles, while ensuring that the true community structure remains present
in the graph. Thus the semirandom model aims to capture the unpredictable nature of real data.
An algorithm is called robust to monotone adversaries if, whenever it succeeds on a sample from
the random model, it also succeeds after arbitrary monotone changes to that sample. Algorithms
based on semidefinite programming (SDP) are typically robust, or can be modified to be robust,
and essentially all known robust algorithms are based on convex programs such as SDPs. This
property guarantees some ability of such algorithms to generalize to other models; by contrast,
algorithms that over-exploit precise statistics of a random model will typically fail against similar
random models with different statistics, and will also typically fail against a semirandom model.
1.2.3
Regimes
The stochastic block model admits two major regimes of study, along with other variants. The
main distinction is between partial recovery, in which the goal is only to recover a partition that
is reliably correlated with the true partition better than random guessing, versus exact recovery,
in which the partition must be recovered perfectly. In partial recovery, one tends to take the withincommunity edge probability p and the between-community edge probability q to be Θ(1/n), whereas
in exact recovery one takes them to be Θ(log n/n). In these asymptotic regimes one observes a
sharp threshold behavior: within some range of parameters p and q, the problem is statistically
impossible, and outside of that range one can find algorithms that succeed with high probability.
For partial recovery, this is established in [MNS14, MNS13, Mas14], and for exact recovery, the
most general result on this threshold is established in [AS15a].
This paper concerns the case of exact recovery. Thus we take probabilities p = p̃ log n/n,
q = q̃ log n/n, and we suppose that the vertex set is partitioned into r communities S1 , . . . , Sr of
sizes si = |Si |. We write πi = si /n, the proportion of vertices lying in community i. More precisely,
2
we only require si /n → πi as n → ∞; for instance, each vertex could be independently randomly
assigned to a community, with community i chosen with probability πi . We hold r, p̃, q̃, and πi
constant as n → ∞ – these are the parameters for the problem – and we aim to exactly recover
the communities Si (up to permutation) with high probability, by which we mean probability
1 − o(1) as n → ∞, within as broad a range of parameters as possible.
We specialize to the assortative planted partition model, where p > q; some techniques may
transfer to the dissortative p < q case, by judicious negations, but we do not elaborate on this.
There remains one more distinction to make: we have not yet specified whether the parameters
r, p̃, q̃, and πi are hidden or known to the recovery algorithm. We present algorithms for two cases:
the known sizes case, where the community proportions πi are known but p̃ and q̃ are potentially
unknown; and the unknown sizes case, where the πi are unknown but p̃, q̃, and the number r
of communities are known. Even the case of fully unknown parameters is tractable [AS15b], but
there are fundamental barriers that prevent robust approaches such as ours from achieving this.
We elaborate on this in Section 4.
1.3
Contributions and prior work
The main result of this paper is that two variants of a certain SDP achieve exact recovery, up to the
information-theoretic threshold, against the planted partition model with multiple communities of
potentially different sizes. These SDPs are furthermore robust to monotone adversaries.
There has been considerable prior work on the development of algorithms and lower bounds
for the stochastic block model, with algorithms making use of a wide range of techniques; see for
instance the introduction to [ABH16] and works cited there. The use of semidefinite programming
for exact recovery originated with [FK01], who achieved robust exact recovery in the case of two
communities of equal sizes, falling slightly short of the optimal performance threshold. More
recently, semidefinite algorithms have been found especially effective on sparse graphs [CSX12,
ABH16], and have been proven to match lower bounds for the planted partition model in the case
of two equal-sized communities [Ban15, HWX15a], two different-sized communities [HWX15b],
and multiple equal-sized communities [HWX15b, ABKK15], but the case of recovering multiple
communities of different sizes through SDPs remained unresolved until now. The SDP that we
consider in this paper has appeared before in the literature [GV15, ABKK15], and in fact Agarwal
et al. [ABKK15] conjectured that it achieves exact recovery up to the threshold; the main result of
this paper resolves this conjecture affirmatively.
Abbe and Sandon [AS15a] established the information-theoretic threshold for the general stochastic block model with individual community-pair probabilities Qij , which we visit in Section 3. In
addition to proving a sharp lower bound, they analyzed an algorithm that succeeds with high probability up to their lower bound, thus precisely determining the statistical limits for exact recovery.
Their result may appear strictly more general than ours, applying to the general stochastic block
model rather than the more specific planted partition model. However, their algorithm involves
a highly-tuned spectral clustering step that is likely not robust to monotone adversaries or other
forms of perturbation (see Section 4 for discussion), and so our work can be seen as an improvement
from the robustness standpoint.
In fact, there are barriers against more general semirandom results. We show in Section 4 that
no algorithm robust to monotone adversaries can handle the case of fully unknown parameters, nor
can it extend from the planted partition model to the slightly more general strongly assortative
block model. Thus our SDP-based approach is already essentially as general as one could hope for
without compromising the strength of its robustness.
Although we are primarily interested in the exact recovery regime, we will take a brief detour
3
and survey the parallel line of work on partial recovery. In contrast to exact recovery, none of the
partial recovery algorithms that succeed down to the information-theoretic threshold are based on
SDPs, and they have no robustness guarantees. There are robust SDP methods known [GV15,
MPW16, MMV16] but they fall short of the threshold; this is essential, as it has been shown
that no algorithm can robustly achieve the partial recovery threshold [MPW16]. Although robust
algorithms for partial recovery cannot reach the threshold, there is an SDP that is conjectured to
come quite close [JMR16] and is known to achieve the threshold in the limit of large average degree
[MS16]; however, this analysis does not come with a robustness guarantee. By contrast, this paper
shows that robust recovery is efficiently achievable up to the threshold in the exact recovery setting.
Community detection in semirandom models was previously discussed in [FK01, CSX14, AL14],
and further since the first appearance of this paper, in [MPW16, MMV16, HWX15a]. Other works
[CL15, MMV16] discuss robustness to some quantity of corruptions or outlier nodes.
1.4
Overview of techniques
In this section we summarize the arguments by which we prove that our SDPs achieve exact
recovery against the semirandom planted partition model. More precisely, we show that with
high probability, the unique SDP optimum is a matrix that exactly encodes the correct community
structure; in contrast to some SDP-based algorithms (both for community detection and otherwise),
there is no ‘rounding’ or post-processing procedure required.
The first step is to show robustness in the sense that if the SDP succeeds against a particular
graph, then it will continue to succeed if that graph is modified by monotone changes. This follows
from a simple argument in [FK01] which essentially observes that the SDP optimizes over a space
of solutions, and monotone changes improve the objective value of the true solution more than they
improve the objective value of any other solution.
In light of the above argument, it suffices to show that our SDP succeeds with high probability
against the random model. As in previous work on SDPs for exact recovery, our proof proceeds
by constructing a dual certificate. The idea here is that the SDP is a maximization problem
for which the true solution is feasible; what we need to show is that no other solution has a
larger objective value than the true one, which can be done by finding a matching solution to
the dual SDP. This “dual certificate” that we construct depends on the random graph and can
be shown to be dual-feasible with high probability. As is typical, the construction of the dual
certificate is guided by complementary slackness, which provides a set of necessary conditions.
However, these necessary conditions are not enough to uniquely determine the dual certificate and
so some creativity is necessary here in order to find an optimal certificate that gets all the way to
the threshold. Part of what makes the general problem harder than the special cases considered
previously [HWX15b] is that the general case has more dual variables that are not automatically
determined by complementary slackness but that nonetheless need to be chosen carefully. The
crucial step in the construction of our dual certificate is that by making a change of variables
we are able to find a connection between the complementary slackness conditions and the nonnegativity of differences of certain binomial random variables, which in turn are closely related to
the information-theoretic threshold. It then becomes clear which parts of the dual solution need to
crucially be set a particular way, and which ones have “wiggle room.” As is typical, showing that
our dual matrix is positive semidefinite relies in part on the spectral concentration of the adjacency
matrix, e.g. Theorem 5.2 in [LR15].
4
1.5
Organization of this paper
In Section 2 we present our two closely-related semidefinite programs for exact recovery. In Section 3
we discuss the information-theoretic threshold determined in [AS15a]. In Section 4 we show that
our SDPs are robust to the semirandom model, and we give some impossibility results for robust
algorithms. In Section 5 we prove our main result: our SDPs achieve exact recovery up to the
information-theoretic threshold.
2
Semidefinite algorithms and results
In this section we derive semidefinite programs for exact recovery, by taking convex relaxations of
maximum likelihood estimators. Throughout we will use the letters u, v for vertices and the letters
i, j for communities.
2.1
Maximum likelihood estimators
Given an observed n-vertex graph, a natural statistical approach to recovering the community structure is to compute a maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE). We begin by stating the log-likelihood
of a candidate partition into communities:
X
X
X
X
log L =
log p +
log q +
log(1 − p) +
log(1 − q)
u∼v
same community
u∼v
diff community
u6∼v
same community
u6∼v
diff community
Here ∼ denotes adjacency in the observed graph. We can represent a partition by its n×n partition
matrix
(
1 if u and v are in the same community,
Xuv =
0 otherwise.
In terms of X and the observed (0, 1)-adjacency matrix A, we can write
2 log L(X) = hA, Xi log p + hA, J − Xi log q
+ hJ − I − A, Xi log(1 − p) + hJ − I − A, J − Xi log(1 − q)
where I is the identity matrix, J is the all-ones matrix, and h·, ·i denotes the Frobenius (entry-wise)
inner product of matrices. Expanding, and discarding terms that do not depend on X, including
hX, Ii = n:
2 log L(X) + const = αhA, Xi − βhJ, Xi
r
X
s2i ,
= αhA, Xi − β
i=1
where
α = log
p(1 − q)
,
q(1 − p)
β = log
1−q
.
1−p
The assumption p > q implies that α and β are positive.
At this stage it is worth distinguishing the two cases of known and unknown sizes. In the first
form, the block sizes si are known; then the second term above is a constant, and the MLE amounts
to a minimum fixed-sizes multisection problem, and is NP-hard for worst-case A.
5
Program 1 (Known sizes MLE).
maximize
over
hA, Xi
partition matrices X with community sizes s1 , . . . , sr .
In the second form of the problem, the block sizes si are unknown (but r is known). Now the
MLE requires knowledge of p and q, and the resulting regularized minimum multisection problem
is also likely computationally hard in general.
Program 2 (Unknown sizes MLE).
maximize
over
where
ω=
hA, Xi − ωhJ, Xi
all partition matrices X on r communities,
β
log(1 − q) − log(1 − p)
=
.
α
log p + log(1 − q) − log q − log(1 − p)
(1)
Although it is not obvious from the definition, we can think of ω as a sort of average of p and
q; the proof is deferred to Appendix A:
Lemma 1. For all 0 < q < p < 1, we have q < ω < p.
In order to compute either MLE in polynomial time, we will pass to a relaxation and show that
the computation succeeds with high probability.
2.2
Semidefinite algorithms
The seminal work of [GW95] began a successful history of semidefinite relaxations for cut problems.
Proceeding roughly in this vein to write a convex relaxation for the true feasible region of partition
matrices of given sizes, one might reasonably arrive at the following relaxation of the known-sizes
MLE:
Program 3 (Known sizes, primal, weak form).
maximize
hA, Xi
subject to
hJ, Xi =
∀u Xuu = 1,
X
s2i ,
i
X ≥ 0,
X 0.
Here X ≥ 0 indicates that X is entry-wise nonnegative, and X 0 indicates that X is positive
semidefinite (and, in particular, symmetric).
This SDP appears in [AL14] (under the name SDP-2’). Under the assumption of equal-sized
communities, a stronger form involving row sum constraints appears in [AL14, HWX15b, ABKK15],
and the latter two papers find that this strengthening achieves exact recovery up to the informationtheoretic lower bound in the case of equal-sized communities.
In the case of unequal community sizes, it is more difficult to pursue this line of strengthening.
The authors have analyzed the weaker SDP above for multiple unbalanced communities, and found
6
that it does achieve exact recovery within some parameter range in the logarithmic regime, but its
threshold for exact recovery is strictly worse than the information-theoretic threshold. (We have
opted to omit these proofs from this paper, in view of our stronger results on the programs below.)
Instead, we revisit the somewhat arbitrary decision to encode the partition matrix with entries
0 and 1. Indeed, SDPs for the unbalanced two-community case tend to use entries −1 and 1
[FK01, ABH16, HWX15b], with success up to the information-theoretic lower bound [HWX15b].
Some choices of entry values will result in a non-PSD partition matrix, so we opt for the choice
of entries for which the partition matrix is only barely PSD: namely, we define the centered
partition matrix
(
1
if u and v are in the same community,
Xuv = −1
otherwise.
r−1
Recall that r is the number of communities. This matrix is PSD as it is a Gram matrix: if we
geometrically assign to each community a vector pointing to a different vertex of a centered regular
simplex in Rr−1 , the resulting Gram matrix is precisely the centered partition matrix.
Aiming to recover this matrix, we reformulate our SDP as follows:
Program 4 (Known sizes, primal, strong form).
maximize
hA, Xi
subject to hJ, Xi =
r X 2
1
si −
n2 ,
r−1
r−1
i
∀u Xuu = 1,
−1
,
X≥
r−1
X 0.
This SDP bears a strong similarity to classical SDPs for maximum r-cut [FJ94], and [ABKK15]
conjectured that it achieves exact recovery for unbalanced multisection up to the informationtheoretic lower bound. Our main result resolves this conjecture affirmatively.
Other than the natural motivation of following classical approaches to r-cut problems, the
change from partition matrices to centered partition matrices buys us something mathematically
concrete: the intended primal solution now has rank r − 1 instead of rank r, which through complementary slackness will entail one less constraint on a candidate dual optimum.
We can write down a very similar relaxation for the MLE in the case of unknown sizes but
known p and q:
Program 5 (Unknown sizes, primal, strong form).
maximize
subject to
hA, Xi − ωhJ, Xi
∀u Xuu = 1,
−1
,
X≥
r−1
X 0.
Here ω is as defined in (1). Our main assertion is that these SDPs achieve exact recovery up to
the lower bounds in [AS15a]:
7
Theorem 2. Given input from the planted partition model with parameters (p̃, q̃, π), Programs 4
(known sizes) and 5 (unknown sizes) recover the true centered partition matrix as the unique optimum, with probability 1 − o(1) over the random graph, within the information-theoretically feasible
range of parameters described by Theorem 3.
To reiterate, the known sizes
(Program 4) requires knowledge of the sum of squares of
PSDP
2
community sizes (equivalently
i πi ) and the number r of communities, but p and q can be
unknown; the unknown sizes SDP (Program 5) requires knowledge of p, q, and r (or at least ω and
r), but the community proportions π can be unknown.
Program 5 can tolerate some mis-specification in the value of ω, though this tolerance may shrink
to zero as the problem parameters approach the information-theoretic threshold. This tolerance is
implicit in the proof of Theorem 2.
3
Lower bounds
In this section we visit the general information-theoretic lower bounds established by [AS15a],
and we specialize them to the planted partition model, recovering bounds that directly generalize
those of [HWX15b] for the case of two unequal communities. Meanwhile, we recall operational
interpretations of the lower bounds, which will be our main concrete handle on them.
Consider the general stochastic block model (probabilities Qij ) in the regime where community
sizes are si = πi n and probabilities are Qij = Q̃ij log n/n, with π and Q̃ constant as n → ∞. The
threshold for exact recovery is as follows:
Theorem 3 ([AS15a]). For i 6= j define the Chernoff–Hellinger divergence
X
def
πk (t Q̃ik + (1 − t)Q̃jk − Q̃tik Q̃1−t
D+ (i, j) = sup
jk ).
(2)
t∈[0,1] k
Then exact recovery is information-theoretically solvable if
∀i 6= j
D+ (i, j) > 1.
(3)
Within this range, there exist efficient algorithms that succeed with probability 1 − o(1).
Conversely, exact recovery is impossible if there exists a pair (i, j) with D+ (i, j) < 1. Within
this range, any estimator for the community structure (even knowing the model parameters) will
fail with probability 1 − o(1).
[AS15a] also shows that the borderline case D+ (i, j) = 1 remains solvable; for simplicity we
neglect this case.
As mentioned in [AS15a], if we specialize as far as the planted partition model with two equalsized communities, then the CH-divergence is obtained at t = 12 , and one recovers the threshold
√
√
√
p̃ − q̃ ≥ 2, as seen in [ABH16] and other works. In Appendix B, we compute the following
generalization:
Proposition 4. For the planted partition model with parameters (p̃, q̃, π), the CH-divergence is
given by
πj p̃ τ (πi − πj ) + γ
1
·
,
D+ (i, j) = πi q̃ + πj p̃ − γ + τ (πi − πj ) log
2
πi q̃ τ (πj − πi ) + γ
q
γ = τ 2 (πi − πj )2 + 4πi πj p̃q̃,
τ=
p̃ − q̃
.
log p̃ − log q̃
8
Note that in our regime (logarithmic average degree), we have
ω = τ log n/n + o(log n/n).
(4)
The divergence expression in Proposition 4 strongly resembles the lower bound proven in
[HWX15b] for the case of two communities of different sizes. Indeed, in the notation of Lemma 2
of [HWX15b], we recognize our expression as
g (πi , πj , p̃, q̃, τ (πj − πi )) .
From that lemma, the following operational definition of the CH-divergence is immediate for the
planted partition model:
Lemma 5. Let i 6= j be communities, and let v be a vertex in community i. Let E(v, j) denote the
number of edges from v to vertices in community j. Suppose that T (n) = τ (πi − πj ) log n + o(log n).
The probability of the tail event E(v, i) − E(v, j) ≤ T (n) is n−D+ (i,j)+o(1) .
By a naive union bound, when D+ (i, j) > 1 for all pairs i, j, then we can assert with high
probability that none of these tail events occur, over all vertices and communities.
A similar operational interpretation is given directly in [AS15a], phrased in terms of hypothesis
testing between multivariate Poisson distributions. This result keeps more complete track of the
o(1) term, so as to guarantee the union bound even when D+ (i, j) = 1.
Lastly we note the following monotonicity property of the divergence, with a proof deferred to
Appendix C:
Proposition 6. In the planted partition model, the CH-divergence D+ (i, j) is monotone increasing
in πi and πj (for any fixed p̃, q̃).
Thus, when determining whether exact recovery is feasible in the planted partition model for
some set of parameters, it suffices to check the CH-divergence between the two smallest communities.
4
Semirandom robustness and its consequences
4.1
The semirandom model
Let X̂ be the ground truth partition of the vertices into communities.
Definition 1. Following [FK01] we define a monotone adversary to be a process which takes as
input a graph (for instance, a random graph sampled from the stochastic block model with ground
truth X̂) and makes any number of monotone changes of the following types:
• The adversary can add an edge between two vertices in the same community of X̂.
• The adversary can remove an edge between two vertices in different communities of X̂.
These monotone changes appear to only strengthen the presence of the true community structure
X̂ in the observed graph, yet they may destroy statistical properties of the random model. The
semirandom model is designed to penalize brittle algorithms that over-rely on specific stochastic
models. It does not intend to mimic any real-world adversarial scenario, but it does intend to model
the inherent unpredictability of real-world data.
It may help to consider examples of how such an adversary could break an algorithm:
9
• Many algorithms perform PCA on the adjacency matrix [LR15]. The adversary could plant a
slightly denser sub-community structure in a community, thus splitting one cluster of vertices
into several nearby sub-clusters in the PCA, and introducing doubt as to which granularity
of clustering is appropriate.
• An adversary could introduce a noise distribution that changes the shape of clusters of vertices
in the PCA or spreads them out, resulting in either a failure to cluster correctly, or else a
failure in subsequent steps of estimating parameters and improving the community structure
(as in [AS15b]).
These are extreme examples, but they correspond to realistic concerns:
• Real community structure is sometimes hierarchical, e.g. tight friend groups within a larger
social community.
• Many real networks have hubs, or a degree distribution that is nowhere near Gaussian, so
hypothesis tests designed for distributions of roughly Gaussian shape may have trouble generalizing.
4.2
Robustness
In this section, we establish that our SDPs are robust to monotone adversaries. We first elaborate
on the definitions discussed in the introduction.
Definition 2. Suppose f is a (deterministic) algorithm for recovery in the stochastic block model,
namely f takes in an adjacency matrix A and outputs a partition f (A) of the vertices. We say f
is robust to monotone adversaries if: for any A such that f (A) = X̂, we have f (A′ ) = X̂ for
any A′ obtained from A via a sequence of monotone changes.
We modify this definition slightly for SDPs in order to deal with the fact that an SDP may not
have a unique optimum. By abuse of notation, let X̂ also refer to the centered partition matrix
corresponding to the partition X̂.
Definition 3. Suppose PA is a semidefinite program which depends on the adjacency matrix A
(for instance, Program 4 or Program 5). We say PA is robust to monotone adversaries if: for
any A such that X̂ is the unique optimum to PA , we have that X̂ is the unique optimum to PA′
for any A′ obtained from A via a sequence of monotone changes.
SDPs tend to possess such robustness properties. We will now show that our SDPs are no
exception, following roughly the same type of argument as [FK01].
Proposition 7. Programs 4 (known sizes) and 5 (unknown sizes) are robust to monotone adversaries.
Proof. Let PA be either Program 4 or Program 5 (the proof is identical for both cases). Suppose the
true centered partition matrix X̂ is the unique optimum for PA . By induction it is sufficient to show
that X̂ is the unique optimum for PA′ where A′ is obtained from A via a single monotone change.
Note that PA and PA′ have the same feasible region because A only affects the objective function.
Let PA (X) denote the objective value of a candidate solution X for PA , namely PA (X) is hA, Xi
for Program 4 and hA, Xi − ωhJ, Xi for Program 5. First consider the case where A′ is obtained
from A via a single monotone edge-addition step. Since the added edge lies within a community
of X̂ we have PA′ (X̂) = PA (X̂) + 2. For any matrix X feasible for PA (equivalently, feasible for
10
PA′ ), we have PA′ (X) ≤ PA (X) + 2; this follows from X ≤ 1 (entry-wise), which is implied by the
constraints Xvv = 1 and X 0. If X 6= X̂ we have PA′ (X̂) = PA (X̂) + 2 > PA (X) + 2 ≥ PA′ (X)
and so X̂ is the unique optimum of PA′ . Similarly, for the case where A′ is obtained from A via a
2
2
and PA′ (X) ≤ PA (X) + r−1
(using
single monotone edge-removal, we have PA′ (X̂) = PA (X̂) + r−1
−1
the constraint X ≥ r−1 ) and the result follows.
Recall that in the semirandom planted partition model, a random graph is generated according
to the random (planted partition) model and then a monotone adversary is allowed to make monotone changes. Once we have established our main result (Theorem 2) on the success of our SDPs
against the random model, it is an immediate corollary of robustness that our SDPs also succeed
against the semirandom model.
Proposition 8. Programs 4 (known sizes) and 5 (unknown sizes) achieve exact recovery against
the semirandom planted partition model, with probability 1 − o(1), up to the information-theoretic
threshold for the random model (given in Theorem 3).
4.3
BM-ordering and strongly assortative block models
Let SBM(n, Q̃, π) and PPM(n, p̃, q̃, π) denote the stochastic block model and planted partition
model, respectively. Given input from a stochastic block model SBM(n, Q̃, π), we can simulate
certain other stochastic block models SBM(n, Q̃′ , π), by adding edges within communities independently at random, and likewise removing edges between communities. Specifically, we can
simulate any block model for which Q̃′ii ≥ Q̃ii and Q̃′ij ≤ Q̃ij , for all communities i 6= j; in this
case, following [AL14], we say that SBM(n, Q̃′ , π) dominates SBM(n, Q̃, π) in block model ordering
(BM-ordering).
In the case when the original model is a planted partition model, this simulation step can be
thought of as a specific monotone adversary. Block models that dominate a planted partition model
will fall among the strongly assortative class: those for which Q̃ii > Q̃jk whenever j 6= k, i.e. all
intra-community probabilities exceed all inter-community probabilities. The following is immediate
from Proposition 8:
Proposition 9. Programs 4 and 5 achieve exact recovery with high probability against any strongly
assortative block model that dominates a planted partition model lying within the informationtheoretically feasible range.
Extrapolating slightly, we can assert that this extension to the strongly assortative block model
tends to be automatic for semidefinite approaches because they tend to be robust. This has been
previously noted by [AL14] through essentially the same arguments. By taking p̃ = mini Q̃ii and
q̃ = maxj6=k Q̃jk , we could obtain from Proposition 4 a more explicit description of this sufficient
condition for exact recovery.
4.4
Difficulties with general block models
Most natural SDPs tend to be robust to monotone adversaries. This strength of semidefinite
approaches – their ability to adapt to other random models following BM-ordering – can be used
to also reveal their limitations. We will show in this section that it is impossible for an algorithm
robust to monotone changes to match the information-theoretic lower bound of [AS15a] in general,
and even for strongly assortative block models.
11
As an example, define
a
b c+ǫ
Q̃1 = b
a
c ,
c+ǫ c
a
a b c
Q̃2 = b a c .
c c a
For a suitable setting of ǫ > 0 and a, b, c, π, it is possible for SBM(n, Q̃1 , π) to be informationtheoretically feasible for exact recovery while SBM(n, Q̃2 , π) is not. The following values provide
an explicit example:
a = 31.4,
b = 15,
c = 10,
ǫ = 1,
π = (1/3, 1/3, 1/3).
However, Q̃1 dominates Q̃2 in BM-ordering. As our SDPs cannot hope to recover against SBM(n, Q̃2 , π),
it follows that they fail also against SBM(n, Q̃1 , π), even though this model is information-theoretically
feasible.
This example shows how monotone changes become subtly unhelpful in the strongly assortative
block model: the first two communities become harder to distinguish under these monotone changes
because their interactions with the third community become more similar. Arguably this makes the
semirandom model inappropriate for such a general block model. Nonetheless, monotone robustness
is a property of our SDPs, and also of all prior SDPs in the community detection literature (at least
after minor strengthening), and so the limitations below apply at least to these specific SDPs. Thus
we are able to learn about the limitations of these SDPs by studying their robustness properties.
The argument above applies to any algorithm that is robust to the semirandom model; this
means no robust algorithm can achieve the threshold. This motivates us to conjecture a different
“monotone threshold” for general block models, which we believe captures the information-theoretic
limits in the general semirandom model. Define the monotone divergence
X
m
πk (t Q̃ik + (1 − t)Q̃jk − Q̃tik Q̃1−t
D+
(i, j) = sup
jk ).
t∈[0,1] k∈{i,j}
m (i, j) is simply the value of D (i, j) after setting Q = Q
/ {i, j}; this
Note that D+
+
ik
jk for all k ∈
is a change in model that the monotone adversary can simulate (for instance set Qik = Qjk = 0),
and it is in fact the best change-in-model that the adversary can simulate if it wants to decrease
m (i, j) < 1 for some
D+ (i, j) as much as possible for a specific (i, j) pair. It follows that if D+
i 6= j then there does not exist a robust algorithm achieving exact recovery. We conjecture that
m (i, j) ≥ 1 for all i 6= j, and if the block model is furthermore weakly assortative
conversely, if D+
(Qii > Qij for all i 6= j), then there exists a robust algorithm achieving exact recovery against this
block model.
4.5
Difficulties with unknown parameters
Non-semidefinite techniques in [AS15b] achieve exact recovery up to the threshold without knowing
any of the model parameters. One might ask whether it is possible for a robust algorithm (such
as our SDPs) to achieve this; we now argue that this is not possible in general even in the planted
partition model.
Consider for example a strongly assortative block model SBM(n, Q̃, π), on four communities,
where
a b c c
b a c c
Q̃ =
c c a b
c c b a
12
and a > b > c. This model may be simulated by a monotone adversary acting on either of the
planted partition models PPM(n, a, b, π) and PPM(n, b, c, π ′ ), where π ′ = (π1 +π2 , π3 +π4 ). Suppose
that we had a robust algorithm for exact recovery in the planted partition model without knowing
any of the parameters. For a suitable setting of a, b, c, π, such an algorithm should be able to
achieve exact recovery against the two planted partition models listed above. By robustness, it will
still recover the same partition, with high probability, when presented with the strongly assortative
block model SBM(n, Q̃, π). But now we have a contradiction: the algorithm allegedly recovers both
partitions (corresponding to π and π ′ ) with high probability.
In effect, these two planted partition models have zero “monotone total variation distance”,
though we do not formalize this notion here. It is necessary to know some model parameters in
advance in order for robust algorithms to distinguish such models. A few approaches are available
to overcome this drawback:
• One could statistically estimate some or all of the parameters before running the SDP, as in
Appendix B of [HWX15b]. However, this statistical approach relies on the specific random
model and spoils our robustness guarantees.
• One could try running the SDP several times on a range of possible input parameters, ignoring
any returned solutions that are not partition matrices. A close reading of Section 5 reveals
that, when running Program 5 (unknown sizes), mis-guessing the parameter ω by any 1− o(1)
factor does not affect whether one succeeds with high probability.
This approach may return several valid solutions. In the example above, this approach will
recover both of the given planted partition models, with high probability. In general this
approach recovers the type of hierarchical community structure that the above example exhibits.
5
Proof of exact recovery
In this section we prove our main result (Theorem 2) which states that our SDPs achieve exact
recovery against the planted partition model, up to the information-theoretic limit. Specifically,
we show that if the divergence condition (3) holds, then with high probability, the true centered
partition matrix X̂ is the unique optimum for our SDPs. The main idea of the proof is to construct
a solution to the dual SDP in order to bound the value of the primal.
5.1
Notation
Recall that we use the letters u, v for vertices and the letters i, j for communities. We let 1 denote
the all-ones vector, 1i denote the indicator vector of Si , I denote the identity matrix, and J denote
the all-ones matrix. When M is any matrix, MSi Sj will denote the submatrix indexed by Si × Sj ,
and we abbreviate MSi Si by MSi .
Let A be the adjacency matrix of the observed graph and write E(i, j) = 1⊤
i A1j ; when i 6= j
this is the number of edges between communities i and j, and when i = j this is twice the number
of edges within community i.
All asymptotic notation refers to the limit n → ∞, with parameters p̃, q̃, and π held fixed.
Throughout, we say an event occurs “with high probability” if its probability is 1 − o(1).
13
5.2
Weak duality
Following the standard dual certificate approach, we begin by writing down duality and complementary slackness for our SDP. This will lead us to a set of sufficient conditions, outlined in
Proposition 10 below.
We first write down the dual of Program 5:
Program 6 (Dual, unknown sizes).
minimize
subject to
X
νv +
v
def
1
hJ, Γi
r−1
Λ = diag(ν) + ωJ − A − Γ 0,
Γ≥0
symmetric.
Here the n-vector ν and the n × n matrix Γ (both indexed by vertices) are dual variables, and
ω is as defined in (1). We can now state weak duality in this context:
hA, Xi − ωhJ, Xi = hA − ωJ, Xi = hdiag(ν) − Γ − Λ, Xi
X
=
νv − hΓ, Xi − hΛ, Xi
v
=
X
νv +
v
1
1
hJ, Γi − hΓ, X +
Ji − hΛ, Xi.
r−1
r−1
P
1
hJ, Γi (the primal objective value is
This implies weak duality hA, Xi − ωhJ, Xi ≤ v νv + r−1
1
1
at most the dual objective value) because hΓ, X + r−1 Ji ≥ 0 (since Γ ≥ 0, X + r−1
J ≥ 0) and
hΛ, Xi ≥ 0 (since Λ 0, X 0).
5.3
Complementary slackness
From above we have the following complementary slackness conditions. If X is primal feasible and
1
(ν, Γ) is dual feasible then X and (ν, Γ) have the same objective value if and only if hΓ, X+ r−1
Ji = 0
and hΛ, Xi = 0. Since Λ and X are PSD, hΛ, Xi = 0 is equivalent to ΛX = 0 (this can be shown
using the rank-1 decomposition of PSD matrices), which in turn is equivalent to colspan(X) ⊆
ker(Λ).
Although we have only considered Program 5 so far, everything we have done also applies to
Program 4. The dual of Program 4 is identical to Program 6, except that ω is replaced by a dual
variable, and there is a corresponding term in the objective. By deterministically choosing this
dual variable to take the value ω, we arrive at a dual program with the same feasible region and
complementary slackness conditions as Program 6. From this point onward, the same arguments
apply to both Programs 4 and 5.
−1
) entries. The following proposition
Let X̂ be the true centered partition matrix with (1, r−1
gives a sufficient condition for X̂ to be the unique optimum for Programs 4 and 5.
Proposition 10. Suppose there exists a dual solution (ν, Γ) satisfying:
• Λ 0,
• ΓSi = 0 for all i,
• ΓSi Sj > 0 (entry-wise) for all i 6= j,
14
• ker(Λ) = span{1i − 1j }i,j .
Then X̂ is the unique optimum for Programs 4 and 5. (Here Λ is defined as Λ = diag(ν)+ωJ −A−Γ
as in Program 6.)
Proof. The first three assumptions imply that (ν, Γ) is dual feasible. The column span of X̂ is
span{r 1i −1}i = span{1i −1j }i,j so the fourth assumption is that colspan(X̂) = ker(Λ), which is one
1
Ji = 0
of our two complementary slackness conditions. The assumption ΓSi = 0 implies hΓ, X̂ + r−1
1
because X̂ + r−1 J is supported on the diagonal blocks. This is the other complementary slackness
condition, so complementary slackness holds, certifying that X̂ is primal optimal (ν, Γ) is dual
optimal.
To show uniqueness, suppose X is any optimal primal solution. By complementary slackness,
1
colspan(X) ⊆ ker(Λ) = span{1i − 1j }i,j and hΓ, X + r−1
Ji = 0. Since ΓSi Sj > 0, this means
−1
XSi Sj = r−1 J for all i 6= j. But since every column of X is in span{1i − 1j }i,j , we must now have
XSi = J and so X = X̂.
We note that Proposition 10 is not novel in that all the arguments we have made so far are
standard in the dual certificate approach.
5.4
Construction of dual certificate – overview
We now explore the space of dual certificates that will satisfy the conditions of Proposition 10, so
as to sound out how to construct such a certificate. The main result of this section is to rewrite
the problem in terms of a new set of variables γu . We believe this change of variables is novel,
and it is crucial to our approach because it will allow us to make a connection between between
complementary slackness and certain differences of binomial variables that are closely related to
the information-theoretic threshold (see Lemma 5).
The condition span{1i − 1j } ⊆ ker(Λ) is equivalent to
∀u, ∀i 6= j
e⊤
u Λ(1i − 1j ) = 0.
Using the definition Λ = diag(ν) + ωJ − A − Γ, this can be rewritten as the two equations
X
∀i 6= j, ∀u ∈ Si νu + ω(si − sj ) − E(u, i) + E(u, j) +
Γuv = 0
(5)
v∈Sj
and
∀i 6= j, ∀u ∈
/ Si , u ∈
/ Sj
ω(si − sj ) − E(u, i) + E(u, j) −
X
v∈Si
Γuv +
X
Γuv = 0.
(6)
v∈Sj
We can disregard the equations (6) because they are implied by the equationsP
(5) via subtraction.
From (5) we have that, for any fixed u ∈ Si , the quantity ωsj − E(u, j) − v∈Sj Γuv must be
independent of j (for j 6= i). Hence let us define
X
γu = ωsj − E(u, j) −
Γuv ∀j 6= i for u ∈ Si .
(7)
v∈Sj
Rewrite (5) as
νu = E(u, i) − ωsi + γu
for u ∈ Si ,
(8)
and rewrite (7) as
Ruj = ωsj − E(u, j) − γu
15
for u ∈
/ Sj ,
(9)
P
where Ruj is shorthand for the row sum v∈Sj Γuv . Since Γ is symmetric, Ruj must be equal to
P
the column sum v∈Sj Γvu , so we need for any i 6= j,
X
Ruj =
u∈Si
X
Rvi ,
X
[ωsi − E(v, i) − γv ],
v∈Sj
or equivalently:
X
u∈Si
[ωsj − E(u, j) − γu ] =
v∈Sj
or equivalently:
ωsi sj − E(i, j) −
X
u∈Si
γu = ωsi sj − E(i, j) −
X
γv ,
v∈Sj
or equivalently, there needs to exists a constant c such that
X
γu = c ∀i.
(10)
u∈Si
To recap, it remains to do the following. First choose c. Then choose γu satisfying (10). Defining
Ruj by (9), we are now guaranteed that {Ruj }u∈Si and {Rvi }v∈Sj are valid row and column sums
respectively for ΓSi Sj (for i 6= j). Then define νu by (8), which guarantees span{1i − 1j } ⊆ ker(Λ).
It remains to construct ΓSi Sj explicitly from its row and column sums such that ΓSi Sj > 0. It also
remains to show Λ 0 and ker(Λ) ⊆ span{1i − 1j }. Note that we have not actually chosen any
values for dual variables yet, other than what is required by complementary slackness; we have
merely rewritten the complementary slackness conditions in terms of the new variables γu and Ruj .
5.5
Intervals for γv
In this section we find necessary bounds for γv , which will guide our choice of these dual variables
and of c. This is where the crucial connection between γv and the information-theoretic threshold
will become apparent. Let v ∈ Si . For a lower bound on γv , we have that Λ 0 implies Λvv ≥ 0
implies νv + ω ≥ 0 which by (8) implies γv ≥ ω(si − 1) − E(v, i). For an upper bound, for any j 6= i
we must have that ΓSi Sj > 0 implies Rvj > 0 which by (9) implies γv < ωsj − E(v, j). Therefore,
γv must lie in the interval
γv ∈ [ω(si − 1) − E(v, i) , min ωsj − E(v, j)).
j6=i
Our approach in choosing γv will be to first make a preliminary guess γv′ and then add an adjustment
term to ensure that (10) holds. In order to absorb this adjustment, we will aim for γv′ to lie in the
slightly smaller interval
(11)
γv′ ∈ [αv , βv ]
where
αv = ω(si − 1) − E(v, i) + ǫ1
and
βv = min ωsj − E(v, j) − ǫ2
j6=i
for v ∈ Si .
Here ǫ1 and ǫ2 are small o(log n) error terms which we will choose later.
The non-emptiness of these intervals is the crux of the proof, and provides the connection to
the information-theoretic threshold:
16
Lemma 11. If the divergence condition (3) holds, then αv < βv , for all v, with high probability.
Proof. For v ∈ Si , we have
βv − αv = min ((E(v, j) − E(v, i)) − ω(sj − si ) − ǫ1 − ǫ2 )
j6=i
= min(E(v, j) − E(v, i)) − ω(sj − si ) − o(log n)
j6=i
(4)
= min(E(v, j) − E(v, i)) − τ (πj − πi ) log n − o(log n).
j6=i
By Lemma 5, for each v ∈ Si and all j 6= i, the probability of the tail event
(E(v, j) − E(v, i)) − τ (πj − πi ) log n − o(log n) ≤ 0
is n−D+ (i,j)+o(1) . Thus, when D+ (i, j) > 1 for all pairs (i, j), we can take a union bound over all
n(r − 1) such events, to find that βv − αv ≥ 0 with probability 1 − o(1).
By summing (11) over all v ∈ Si (roughly following (10), although γv and γv′ are slightly
different), we obtain a target interval for c:
c ∈ [αi , βi ] ∀i
where
αi =
X
v∈Si
βi =
X
v∈Si
(12)
αv = ωsi (si − 1) − E(i, i) + si ǫ1
βv =
X
v∈Si
min [ωsj − E(v, j) − ǫ2 ].
j6=i
The endpoints of the interval (12) for c will turn out to be highly concentrated near a pair of
deterministic quantities, namely:
ᾱi = (ω − p)si (si − 1) + si ǫ1
and
β̄i = (ω − q)si smin6=i − si ǫ2
(13)
where smin6=i = minj6=i sj .
5.6
Choice of c and γv
We have now made the key insight that c and γv must lie in certain intervals in order to get all
the way to the information-theoretic threshold. However, as long as we fulfill these requirements,
we have some “wiggle room” in choosing the dual variables. We will make what seems to be the
simplest choices. We can deterministically take
1
c = (ω − q)smin s2ndmin ,
2
(14)
where smin , s2ndmin are the sizes of the two smallest communities (which may be equal). Then for
sufficiently large n we have, for all i,
ᾱi < 0 < c < β̄i ,
using the definitions (13) of ᾱi , β̄i along with the facts ǫ1 , ǫ2 = o(log n) and q < ω < p (Lemma 1).
Our specific choice of c is not crucial; we can in fact pick any deterministic 0 < c < β̄i provided
that c = Θ(n log n) and β̄i − c = Θ(n log n) for all i.
17
Recall thatPour goal is to choose each γv to lie in (or close to) the interval [αv , βv ] subject to
the condition v∈Si γv = c required by (10). To achieve this, define the deterministic quantity
κi =
c − ᾱi
∈ (0, 1).
β̄i − ᾱi
(15)
Note that we expect c to lie roughly κi fraction of the way through the interval [αi , βi ] (which is
the sum over v ∈ Si of the intervals [αv , βv ]). Mirroring this, we make a rough initial choice γv′ (for
v ∈ Si ) that is κi fraction of the way through the interval [αv , βv ]:
γv′ = (1 − κi )αv + κi βv
(16)
P
However, these do not satisfy v∈Si γv′ = c on the nose – rather, there is some error that is on the
order of the difference
between αi and ᾱi . We thus introduce an additive correction term δi chosen
P
to guarantee v∈Si γv = c. For v ∈ Si ,
γv = γv′ + δi ,
X
1
c−
γv′ .
δi =
si
v∈Si
Recall that our goal was for γv to lie within some o(log n) error from the interval [αv , βv ]. By
construction we have γv′ ∈ [αv , βv ] and so we will have succeeded if we can show δi = o(log n). This
will be one of the goals of the next section.
5.7
High-probability bounds for random variables
In this section we establish bounds on various variables in the dual certificate that will hold with
high probability 1 − o(1). We can treat the failure of these bounds as a low-probability failure event
for the algorithm.
First recall the following version of the Bernstein inequality:
Lemma 12 (Bernstein inequality). If X1 , . . . , Xk are independent zero-mean random variables with
|Xi | ≤ 1, then for any t > 0,
!
"
#
X
− 12 t2
.
Pr
Xi ≥ t ≤ exp P
1
Var[X
]
+
t
i
i
3
i
Note that by replacing Xi with −Xi we get the same bound for Pr [
For each vertex v, let
∆v = max |E(v, j) − E[E(v, j)]|
j
P
i Xi
≤ −t ].
(17)
where j ranges over all communities, including that of v. Recall that for v ∈
/ Sj , E(v, j) ∼
Binom(sj , q) and so E[E(v, j)] = sj q; and for v ∈ Sj , E(v, j) ∼ Binom(si − 1, p) and so E[E(v, j)] =
(si − 1)p.
18
Our motivation for defining the quantity ∆v is its appearance in the following bounds:
ᾱi
= |p(si − 1) − E(v, i)| ≤ ∆v
si
β̄i
βv −
= min [ωsj − E(v, j)] − (ω − q)smin6=i ≤ ∆v
j6=i
si
c
c
γv′ −
= (1 − κi )αv + κi βv −
si
si
β̄v
c
ᾱv
+ ∆v
+ κi
−
≤ (1 − κi )
si
si
si
(15)
= ∆v
αv −
(18)
where the third bound makes use of the first two.
Toward bounding ∆v , note that we can apply Bernstein’s inequality (Lemma 12) to bound each
E(v, j) − E[E(v, j)], and take a union bound to obtain
!
− 12 t2
.
Pr[∆v ≥ t] ≤ 2r exp
np + 13 t
Taking t = log n log log n and union bounding over all v, we see that, with high probability,
∆v ≤ log n log log n for all v. But this will not quite suffice for the bounds we need. Instead,
taking t = log n/(log log n)2 , we see that ∆v ≤ log n/(log log n)2 for most values of v, with a
5
number of exceptions that, with high probability, does not exceed n1−1/(log log n) ; for these exceptions, we fall back to the bound of log n log log n above. Above we have used the following
consequence of Markov’s inequality: if there are n bad events, each occurring with probability ≤ p,
then Pr[at least k bad events occur] ≤ np
k .
For the sake of quickly abstracting away this two-tiered complication, we make the following
three computations up front:
X
∆2v ≤ n1−1/(log log n) log2 n (log log n)2 + n
v
u,v
log n
(log log n)2
∆v ≤ n1−1/(log log n) log n log log n + n
v
X
5
X
= O(n log n/(log log n)2 ),
5
log2 n
(log log n)4
= O(n log2 n/(log log n)4 ),
5
(∆u + ∆v )2 ≤ 8n · n1−1/(log log n) log2 n (log log n)2 + 4n2
log2 n
(log log n)4
(19)
(20)
(21)
= O(n2 log2 n/(log log n)4 ),
where the sums range over all vertices u,v. Note that in each case, the non-exceptional vertices
dominate the bound. (One can easily compare two terms in the above calculations by computing
the logarithm of each.)
Now we can show that δi , the correction term from the previous section, is small. For any i we
19
have
|δi | =
X
1
(c −
γv′ )
si
(22)
v∈Si
(18)
≤
X c
1
1 X
∆v
(c −
) +
si
si
si
v∈Si
v∈Si
1 X
=
∆v
si
v∈Si
(19)
= O(log n/(log log n)2 ).
We will be interested in defining the quantity ∆′v = ∆v +|δi | (where v ∈ Si ) due to its appearance
in the following bounds:
(18) c
γv = γv′ + δi =
± O(∆′v ),
si
Rvj = ωsj − E(v, j) − γv
c
= (ω − q)sj − ± O(∆′v ).
si
(23)
(24)
Using the identity (x + y)2 ≤ 2(x2 + y 2 ) along with (20), (21) and (22), we have with high
probability
X
(∆′v )2 = O(n log2 n/(log log n)4 ),
(25)
v
X
(∆′u
u,v
5.8
+ ∆′v )2 = O(n2 log2 n/(log log n)4 ).
(26)
Bounds on νv and Rvj
We can now prove two key results that we will need later: with high probability,
νv ≥
log n
log log n
∀v
(27)
and
Rvj > 0
∀j, ∀v ∈
/ Sj .
(28)
These results should not come as a surprise because they were more or less the motivation for
defining the interval [αv , βv ] for γv in the first place. Since the νv values lie on the diagonal of
Λ, the bound on νv is important for proving Λ 0 which we need for dual feasibility. Since Rvj
are the row sums of Γ, the bound on Rvj is important for achieving ΓSi Sj > 0 which we need for
Proposition 10. The specific quantity logloglogn n is not critical – anything would suffice that is o(log n)
yet large enough to dominate some error terms in a later calculation.
In the previous section we showed (22) we showed |δi | = o(log n) with high probability, and so
we can choose the error terms ǫ1 , ǫ2 from the definition of αv , βv (which, recall, are required to be
20
o(log n)) to absorb δi . Specifically, let
log n
= o(log n)
log log n
ǫ2 = max |δi | + 1 = o(log n).
ǫ1 = max |δi | + ω +
i
i
Recall that by Lemma 11 the intervals [αv , βv ] are all nonempty with high probability, and by
construction we have γv′ ∈ [αv , βv ].
Now we will show (27): νv ≥ logloglogn n . For v ∈ Si we have
νv = E(v, i) − ωsi + γv
= E(v, i) − ωsi + γv′ + δi
≥ E(v, i) − ωsi + αv + δi
≥ E(v, i) − ωsi + ω(si − 1) − E(v, i) + ǫ1 − δi
log n
≥
,
log log n
using the choice of ǫ1 .
Now we show (28): Rvj > 0. For v ∈ Si and j 6= i we have
Rvj = ωsj − E(v, j) − γv
= ωsj − E(v, j) − γv′ − δi
≥ ωsj − E(v, j) − βv − δi
= ωsj − E(v, j) − min [ωsk − E(v, k)] + ǫ2 − δi
k6=i
≥1>0
using the choice of ǫ2 .
5.9
Choice of Γ
We have shown how to choose strictly positive row sums Ruj and column sums Rvi of ΓSi Sj (for
i 6= j). There is still considerable freedom in choosing the individual entries, but we will make what
seems to be the simplest choice: we take ΓSi Sj to be the unique rank-one matrix satisfying these
row and column sums, namely
Ruj Rvi
(ΓSi Sj )uv =
Tij
where Tij is the total sum of all entries of ΓSi Sj ,
Tij =
X
Ruj =
u∈Si
X
Rvi .
(29)
v∈Sj
We showed earlier that this last equality is guaranteed by (10). As the row sums Ruj are all positive
with high probability (28), it follows that ΓSi Sj > 0.
21
5.10
PSD calculation for Λ
We have already shown that if we choose νv and Rvj according to (8) and (9) respectively, then
we have span{1i − 1j } ⊆ ker(Λ). In order to show Λ 0 with ker(Λ) = span{1i − 1j }, we need to
show
x⊤ Λx > 0 ∀x ⊥ span{1i − 1j }.
= {z ∈ Rn :
The orthogonal complement of span{1i − 1j } is spanned by block 0-sum vectors Z q
P
P 1
P 1
P 1
y′
′
v∈Si zv = 0 ∀i} plus the additional vector y =
i si 1i . Let y = ky ′ k =
i si . Fix
i si 1i /
p
x ⊥ span{1i − 1j } with kxk = 1 and write x = βy + 1 − β 2 z for β ∈ [0, 1] and z ∈ Z with
kzk = 1. We have
p
(30)
x⊤ Λx = β 2 y ⊤ Λy + 2β 1 − β 2 z ⊤ Λy + (1 − β 2 )z ⊤ Λz.
We will bound the three terms in (30) separately. In particular, we will show that (with high
probability):
y ⊤ Λy = Ω(log n),
(31)
⊤
2
|z Λy| = O(log n/(log log n) ),
z ⊤ Λz = Ω(log n/ log log n).
Once we have this, we can (for sufficiently large n) rewrite (30) as
x⊤ Λx ≥ β 2 C1 log n − 2β
p
1 − β 2 C2
log n
log n
+ (1 − β 2 ) C3
2
(log log n)
log log n
for some positive constants C1 , C2 , C3 . For sufficiently large n we have
2
log n
log n
(C1 log n) C3
,
> C2
log log n
(log log n)2
which implies x⊤ Λx > 0 for all β ∈ [0, 1], completing the proof that Λ 0 with ker(Λ) = span{1i −
1j }. It remains to show the three bounds in (31).
5.10.1
Compute y ⊤ Λy
y ′⊤ Λy ′ = y ′⊤ (diag(ν) + ωJ − A − Γ)y ′
X
X E(i, j) X Tij
−
=
νv yv2 + ωr 2 −
s
s
si sj
i
j
v
i,j
i,j
X 1 X
X E(i, i) X E(i, j) X
E(i, j)
c
−
(ω −
−
)
=
νv + ωr 2 −
−
2
2
si sj
si sj
si sj
si
si
i
i
(a)
v∈Si
i6=j
i6=j
X 1
X E(i, i)
X 1
=
(E(i, i) − ωs2i + c) + ωr 2 −
− ωr(r − 1) + c
2
2
si sj
si
si
i
i
i6=j
X 1
X 1
2
+
ωr
−
ωr(r
−
1)
+
c
= −ωr + c
si sj
s2i
i
i6=j
!2
X 1
=c
si
(b)
i
22
where (a) expands
fore
P
i,j
Tij using (29),(9),(10), and (b) expands
y ⊤ Λy =
X 1
1
′⊤
′
y
Λy
=
c
.
ky ′ k2
si
P
v∈Si
νv using (8),(10). There(32)
i
Since in (14) we chose c to be Θ(n log n), we have
5.10.2
y ⊤ Λy
= Θ(log n) as desired.
Lower bound for z ⊤ Λy
For v ∈ Si ,
(Λy ′ )v =
X E(v, j) X Rvj
νv
+ ωr −
−
si
sj
sj
j
=
j6=i
X E(v, j) X 1
1
(E(v, i) − ωsi + γv ) + ωr −
−
(ωsj − E(v, j) − γv )
si
sj
sj
j
j6=i
X 1
= γv
si
i
and so
1
(Λy)v = ′ (Λy ′ )v = γv
ky k
Let
(Λy)Z
s
X 1
.
si
i
denote the projection of the vector Λy onto the subspace Z. For v ∈ Si we have
s
s
X 1 (10)
X 1
1 X
c
Z
(Λy)v = (γv −
γv )
.
= (γv − )
si
si
si
si
i
v∈Si
i
Now we have
s
c 2 X 1
(γv − )
z Λy ≥ −k(Λy) k = −
si
si
i v∈Si
i
s
sX X
X 1
(23)
O(∆′v )2
≥ −
si
⊤
sX X
Z
i
v∈Si
i
(25)
= −O(log n/(log log n)2 )
5.10.3
Lower bound for z ⊤ Λz
Note that J, EA + pI and EΓ are block-constant and so the quadratic forms z ⊤ Jz, z ⊤ (EA + pI)z
and z ⊤ (EΓ)z are zero for z ∈ Z. Then
z ⊤ Λz = z ⊤ (diag(ν) + ωJ − A − Γ)z
= z ⊤ diag(ν)z − z ⊤ (A − EA)z + pz ⊤ Iz − z ⊤ (Γ − EΓ)z
≥ min νv + p − kA − EAk − kΓ − EΓk.
v
Earlier we showed (27)
min νv ≥ log n/ log log n
v
with high probability and we have p = Θ( logn n ) = o(log n/ log log n). It remains to bound kA − EAk
and kΓ − EΓk. The next two sections show that each of these two terms is o(log n/ log log n) with
high probability. It then follows that z ⊤ Λz = Ω(log n/ log log n), as desired.
23
5.10.4
Upper bound for kA − EAk
Strong bounds for the spectral norm kA− EAk have already appeared in the block model literature.
Specifically, Theorem 5.2 of [LR15] is plenty stronger than we need; it follows immediately that
p
kA − EAk ≤ O( log n) = o(log n/ log log n).
5.10.5
Upper bound for kΓ − EΓk
Recall that ΓSi Sj has row sums Ruj and total sum (of all entries)
Tij =
X
u∈Si
Ruj
(9,10)
=
ωsi sj − E(i, j) − c.
By applying Bernstein’s inequality (Lemma 12) to E(i, j) we get a high-probability bound for
Tij :
Tij = ωsi sj − E(i, j) − c
√
= (ω − q)si sj − c ± O( n log n).
(33)
We now compute EΓ. This is block-constant, by symmetry under permuting vertices within
each community, and this constant must be
E[Γuv ] =
(ω − q)si sj − c
1
E[Tij ] =
,
si sj
si sj
where u ∈ Si , v ∈ Sj , i 6= j.
We can now compute
Ruj Rvi (ω − q)si sj − c
−
Tij
si sj
si sj Ruj Rvi − ((ω − q)si sj − c)Tij
=
si sj Tij
2
′
′
2 ′
′
(a) ±O(n log n(∆u + ∆v ) + n ∆u ∆v )
=
3
si sj ((ω − q)si sj − c) + o(n log n)
2
′
′
2 ′
′
(b) ±O(n log n(∆u + ∆v ) + n ∆u ∆v )
=
Θ(n3 log n)
= ±O((∆′u + ∆′v )/n + ∆′u ∆′v /(n log n)),
Γuv − EΓuv =
where in step (a), we appeal to the bounds (24), (33), causing cancellations in the high-order terms;
and in (b) we have used the choice of c (14) to check that the denominator is Θ(n3 log n).
We will bound the spectral norm of Γ − EΓ by its Frobenius norm. While this bound is often
24
weak, it will suffice here as Γ has constant rank, so that we only expect to lose a constant factor.
kΓ − EΓk ≤ kΓ − EΓkF
sX
(Γuv − EΓuv )2
=
u,v
v
uX ′
2
′ ∆′
′
u
∆
∆
+
∆
u
u
v
v
=t
+
O
n
n log n
u,v
v
v
′
u
uX ′ ′ 2
′ 2
(a) uX
u
∆
+
∆
∆u ∆v
u
v
O
O
≤t
+t
n
n log n
u,v
u,v
v
!
!
u
sX
X
X
u
1
1
2
t
O (∆′u + ∆′v ) +
(∆′v )2
(∆′u )2
O
≤
n u,v
n log n
v
u
(b)
= O(log n/(log log n)2 ) = o(log n/ log log n),
where (a) uses the triangle inequality for the Euclidean norm and (b) uses the high-probability
bounds (25),(26) for expressions involving ∆′v .
This completes the proof that Λ 0 with ker(Λ) = span{1i − 1j }. We have now satisfied all
conditions of Proposition 10, and so we may conclude Theorem 2: Programs 4 and 5 achieve exact
recovery with probability 1 − o(1).
6
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Ankur Moitra for suggesting the problem, for providing guidance
throughout the project, and for several enlightening discussions on semirandom models. We would
also like to thank David Rolnick for a helpful discussion on MLEs for the block model, and Roxane
Sayde for comments on a draft of this paper.
References
[ABH16]
E. Abbe, A. S. Bandeira, and G. Hall. Exact recovery in the stochastic block model.
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 62(1):471–487, 2016.
[ABKK15] N. Agarwal, A. Bandeira, K. Koiliaris, and A Kolla. Multisection in the Stochastic
Block Model using Semidefinite Programming. arXiv:1507.02323, July 2015.
[AL14]
A. Amini and E. Levina.
arXiv:1406.5647, June 2014.
On semidefinite relaxations for the block model.
[AS15a]
E. Abbe and C. Sandon. Community detection in general stochastic block models:
fundamental limits and efficient recovery algorithms. In 56th Annual IEEE Symposium
on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2015.
[AS15b]
E. Abbe and C. Sandon. Recovering communities in the general stochastic block model
without knowing the parameters. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
28 (NIPS), 2015.
25
[Ban15]
A. S. Bandeira. Random laplacian matrices and convex relaxations. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1504.03987, 2015.
[BS95]
Avrim Blum and Joel Spencer. Coloring random and semi-random k-colorable graphs.
Journal of Algorithms, 19(2):204–234, 1995.
[CL15]
T. Cai and X. Li. Robust and computationally feasible community detection in the
presence of arbitrary outlier nodes. Ann. Statist., 43(3):1027–1059, June 2015.
[CSX12]
Y. Chen, S. Sanghavi, and H. Xu. Clustering sparse graphs. In Advances in neural
information processing systems, pages 2204–2212, 2012.
[CSX14]
Yudong Chen, Sujay Sanghavi, and Huan Xu. Improved graph clustering. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 60(10):6440–6455, 2014.
[DKMZ11] A. Decelle, F. Krzakala, C. Moore, and L. Zdeborová. Asymptotic analysis of the
stochastic block model for modular networks and its algorithmic applications. Physical
Review E, 84(6):066106, December 2011.
[FJ94]
A. Frieze and M. Jerrum. Improved approximation algorithms for MAX k-CUT and
MAX BISECTION. Technical Report ECS-LFCS-94-292, University of Edinburgh,
1994.
[FK01]
U. Feige and J. Kilian. Heuristics for semirandom graph problems. Journal of Computing and System Sciences, 63:639–671, 2001.
[GV15]
O. Guédon and R. Vershynin.
Community detection in sparse networks via
Grothendieck’s inequality. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 2015.
[GW95]
M.X. Goemans and D.P. Williamson. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum
cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. J. ACM, 42(6):1115–
1145, November 1995.
[HLL83]
P. W. Holland, K. B. Laskey, and S. Leinhardt. Stochastic blockmodels: First steps.
Social networks, 5(2):109–137, 1983.
[HWX15a] B. Hajek, Y. Wu, and J. Xu. Achieving exact cluster recovery threshold via semidefinite
programming. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT),
pages 1442–1446, June 2015.
[HWX15b] B. Hajek, Y. Wu, and J. Xu. Achieving Exact Cluster Recovery Threshold via Semidefinite Programming: Extensions. arXiv:1502.07738, February 2015.
[JMR16]
A. Javanmard, A. Montanari, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi. Phase transitions in semidefinite
relaxations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 113(16):E2218–23, 2016.
[LR15]
J. Lei and A. Rinaldo. Consistency of spectral clustering in stochastic block models.
Ann. Statist., 43(1):215–237, February 2015.
[Mas14]
L. Massoulié. Community detection thresholds and the weak Ramanujan property.
Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC
’14), pages 694–703, 2014.
26
[MMV16]
K. Makarychev, Y. Makarychev, and A. Vijayaraghavan. Learning communities in the
presence of errors. In 29th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, pages 1258–1291,
2016.
[MNS13]
E. Mossel, J. Neeman, and A. Sly. A Proof Of The Block Model Threshold Conjecture.
arXiv:1311.4115, November 2013.
[MNS14]
E. Mossel, J. Neeman, and A. Sly. Reconstruction and estimation in the planted
partition model. Probability Theory and Related Fields, pages 1–31, 2014.
[MPW16] A. Moitra, W. Perry, and A. S. Wein. How robust are reconstruction thresholds for
community detection? In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium
on Theory of Computing, pages 828–841. ACM, 2016.
[MS16]
A. Montanari and S. Sen. Semidefinite programs on sparse random graphs and their
application to community detection. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT
Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 814–827. ACM, 2016.
[RJM16]
F. Ricci-Tersenghi, A. Javanmard, and A. Montanari. Performance of a community
detection algorithm based on semidefinite programming. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 699, pages 12015–12025. IOP Publishing, 2016.
A
Proof of Lemma 1
In this appendix we verify, for all 0 < q < p < 1, that q < ω < p, where
ω=
log(1 − q) − log(1 − p)
.
log p − log q + log(1 − q) − log(1 − p)
The proof is an elementary computation using the bound:
both inequalities strict unless x = 1.
For the lower bound, we proceed as follows:
x−1
x
≤ log x ≤ x − 1 for all x > 0, with
log pq
1
=1+
1−q
ω
log 1−p
<1+
p
q
1−q
( 1−p
and for the upper bound, we proceed similarly:
−1
1
1−q = ,
q
− 1) ( 1−p )
log pq
1
=1+
1−q
ω
log 1−p
>1+
p/q−1
p/q
1−q
1−p − 1
so that the result follows by taking reciprocals.
27
=
1
,
p
B
Proof of Proposition 4
In this appendix, we establish a closed form for the CH-divergence in the planted partition model.
The CH-divergence is defined in [AS15a] as
X
πk (tQ̃ik + (1 − t)Q̃jk − Q̃tik Q̃1−t
D+ (i, j) = sup
jk ),
t∈[0,1] k
summing over all communities k including i and j. (The limits on t are unimportant: one can show
that the supremum over t ∈ R always lies in [0, 1].)
Note that if Q̃ik = Q̃jk then the k term of this sum vanishes. In the planted partition model,
we have Q̃ii = Q̃jj = p̃, Q̃ij = Q̃ji = q̃, and Q̃ik = q̃ = Q̃jk for all other k. In particular, only the i
and j terms of the sum will contribute. Thus:
D+ (i, j) = sup tp̃πi + (1 − t)q̃πi + tq̃πj + (1 − t)p̃πj − πi p̃t q̃ 1−t − πj p̃1−t q̃ t
t
= sup t(p̃ − q̃)(πi − πj ) + πi q̃(1 − (p̃/q̃)t ) + πj p̃(1 − (p̃/q̃)−t ).
t
Substituting u = t/(log p̃ − log q̃), we obtain
D+ (i, j) = sup uτ (πi − πj ) + πi q̃(1 − eu ) + πj p̃(1 − e−u )
u≥0
where τ is as defined in Proposition 4.
As the supremand is smooth and concave in u, we can set the derivative in u equal to zero in
order to maximize it:
0 = τ (πi − πj ) − πi q̃eu + πj p̃e−u ,
which is quadratic in eu , and can be solved via the quadratic formula:
p
τ (πi − πj ) + τ 2 (πi − πj )2 + 4πi πj p̃q̃
u
.
e =
2πi q̃
To obtain the simplest possible form for D+ , it is worth also solving for e−u :
p
−τ
(π
−
π
)
+
τ 2 (πi − πj )2 + 4πi πj p̃q̃
i
j
e−u =
.
2πj p̃
Dividing these two expressions, we obtain
e2u =
πj p̃ τ (πi − πj ) + γ
,
πi q̃ τ (πj − πi ) + γ
p
where γ = τ 2 (πi − πj )2 + 4πi πj p̃q̃. We now express u as half the log of this quantity.
Substituting back into the divergence, we obtain
πj p̃ τ (πi − πj ) + γ
1
·
,
D+ (i, j) = πi q̃ + πj p̃ − γ + τ (πi − πj ) log
2
πi q̃ τ (πj − πi ) + γ
thus proving the proposition.
28
C
Proof of Proposition 6
In Proposition 4, we found that D+ (i, j) = η(p̃, q̃, πi , πj ) for a certain explicit function η. We wish
to see that η is monotone increasing in its third and fourth parameters. This implies, for example,
that when checking whether exact recovery is possible in the planted partition model, it suffices to
check that the divergence is at least 1 between the two smallest communities.
Note that η(a, b, αc, αd) = αη(a, b, c, d), and that η(a, b, c, d) = η(a, b, d, c), so it suffices to show
that η(p̃, q̃, s, 1) is monotone in s.
∂
η ≥ 0. We will show this, in turn, by showing that
As η is smooth, we will show that ∂s
2
∂
∂
lims→0 ∂s η ≥ 0 and that ∂s2 η ≥ 0.
• We first compute:
p
1 h
∂
2q̃s − ω 2 (s − 1)2 + 4p̃q̃s
η(p̃, q̃, s, 1) =
∂s
2s
!!#
p
p̃ −τ (s − 1) + τ 2 (s − 1)2 + 4p̃q̃s
p
,
+τ 1 − s + s log
q̃s τ (s − 1) + τ 2 (s − 1)2 + 4p̃q̃s
p
τ 2 (1 + s)2 + 2p̃q̃s − τ (1 + s) τ 2 (s − 1)2 + 4p̃q̃s
∂2
p
.
η(p̃, q̃, s, 1) =
∂s2
2s2 τ 2 (s − 1)2 + 4p̃q̃s
• To see that the second partial is non-negative, it suffices to see that the numerator is nonnegative:
p
?
τ 2 (1 + s)2 + 2p̃q̃s ≥ τ (1 + s) τ 2 (s − 1)2 + 4p̃q̃s
Both sides are non-negative, so it is equivalent to compare their squares:
?
τ 4 (1 + s)4 + 4p̃q̃sτ 2 (1 + s)2 + 4p̃2 q̃ 2 s2 ≥ τ 2 (1 + s)2 (τ 2 (s − 1)2 + 4p̃q̃s)
which is evidently true when s ≥ 0.
• To see that the limit lims→0
∂
∂s η
is non-negative, we first compute it:
q̃
p̃
−p̃q̃ p̃ log τ − q̃ log τ
∂
η=
+
.
lim
s→0 ∂s
τ
log p̃ − log q̃
We now divide through through by q̃, and set α =
p̃
q̃
and β = τq̃ , noting that 1 ≤ β ≤ α:
1
∂
1
1
lim
η = α(1 − ) + β log
s→0
q̃
∂s
β
β
1
1
≥ α(1 − ) − β(1 − )
β
β
1
= (α − β)(1 − ) ≥ 0.
β
This proves the proposition.
29
| 8cs.DS
|
Spreadsheet Debugging
Yirsaw Ayalew
Department of Computer Science
Addis Ababa University
P.O.Box 1176
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[email protected]
Roland Mittermeir
Institut of Informatics-Systems
University of Klagenfurt
Universitätsstr. 65-67,
A-9020, Klagenfurt, Austria
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
Spreadsheet programs, artifacts developed by non-programmers, are used for a variety of
important tasks and decisions. Yet a significant proportion of them have severe quality
problems. To address this issue, our previous work presented an interval-based testing
methodology for spreadsheets. Interval-based testing rests on the observation that
spreadsheets are mainly used for numerical computations. It also incorporates ideas from
symbolic testing and interval analysis.
This paper addresses the issue of efficiently debugging spreadsheets. Based on the
interval-based testing methodology, this paper presents a technique for tracing faults in
spreadsheet programs. The fault tracing technique proposed uses the dataflow information and cell marks to identify the most influential faulty cell(s) for a given formula
cell containing a propagated fault.
Keywords:
spreadsheet debugging, fault tracing, spreadsheets, end-user programming
1. INTRODUCTION
Spreadsheet systems are widely used and highly popular end-user systems. They are used
for a variety of important tasks such as mathematical modeling, scientific computation,
tabular and graphical data presentation, data analysis and decision-making. Many
business applications are based on the results of spreadsheet computations and
consequently important decisions are made based on spreadsheet results. As we cannot
assume professionalism of spreadsheet developers in writing and testing their spreadsheet
programs, we cannot assume professionalism in debugging.
Therefore, this paper presents an approach to help users in identifying cells containing
actually faulty entries. The unifying property of spreadsheet applications is that they
involve numeric computations. Numeric computations constitute the primary turf of
spreadsheets, in spite of the fact that the spreadsheet model finds derived applications in
other areas too. These are as diverse as information visualization [7], concurrent
computation [22, 23], or user interface specifications [10], to name just a few. There is
also a trend towards using the spreadsheet model as a general model for end-user
programming [14].
Despite their popularity due to their ease of use and suitability for numerical
computations, a significant proportion of spreadsheet programs have severe quality
problems. In recent years, there has been an increased awareness of the potential impact
of faulty spreadsheets on business and decision-making. A number of experimental
studies and field audits [5, 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] have shown the serious impact
spreadsheet errors have on business and on decisions made on the basis of results
computed by spreadsheets.
In contrast to the professional use of the results computed by spreadsheets, the
development of these results is less professional. The developers of spreadsheets are
mainly end users who are not expected to follow a formal process of software development although the sheets they produce are of the nature of regular programs and quite
often reach the complexity of typical data processing application software1 . Nevertheless,
spreadsheet developers rather uncritically rely on the initial correctness of their programs.
To address this problem, our previous work [3, 4, 13, 24] presented an interval-based
testing methodology for spreadsheets. The interval-based testing methodology was proposed based on the premise that spreadsheet developers are not software professionals.
The approach takes into account inherent characteristics of spreadsheets as well as the
conceptual models of spreadsheet programmers. It also incorporates ideas from symbolic
testing and interval analysis. Interval-based testing focuses on the functionality of
spreadsheet formulas instead of the internal structure of a spreadsheet program (i.e., it is
not based on a traditional code coverage criterion).
With interval testing, cells containing suspicious values are identified. But as with
conventional programming, the spot where a wrong value figures is not necessarily the
location of the fault in the program. This might be some step in the algorithm that has
been executed on the way to the respective output statement. Since with spreadsheets,
basically all intermediate results of computations are visible on the user interface
(exceptions are only computations within a cell and computations in hidden cells), the
issue of directing spreadsheet users from the cell containing a wrong result to the cell
containing the wrong formula becomes specifically important.
Based on the interval-based testing methodology, this paper presents a technique for
tracing faults in a spreadsheet program. Cells whose value is outside a computed interval
(see section 2) are referred to as cells containing a symptom of fault. The issue is, given a
formula cell with a symptom of fault which depends directly and/or indirectly on other
cells which have symptoms of faults, how to identify the most influential faulty cell. If
we can identify the most influential faulty cell, then correcting that cell may correct many
of the cells showing incorrect values, which are dependent on it thereby simplifying the
debugging process. The fault tracing approach uses information from the interval-based
testing system about the verification status of the cells, dataflow information, and priority
values of cells.
1
For this reason, we refer to the system of interlinked data and formula cells of a spreadsheet also as
“spreadsheet program”
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly describes the interval-based testing
methodology. Section 3 discusses the general problem of fault tracing in relation to
conventional software debugging techniques and spreadsheet debugging. Section 4
discusses the fault tracing strategy supported by the tool developed to support intervalbased spreadsheet analysis. While tracing for faults, there is a need for minimizing the
search region. This requires the identification of those faulty cells, which have a higher
likelihood of containing the most influential faulty cell(s). This is presented in Section
4.1. An example and a fault tracing algorithm are described in this same section. Finally,
the main points of the fault tracing approach are summarized in Section 5.
2. INTERVAL-BASED TESTING
Generally, the main task in testing a program is to be able to detect the existence of
symptoms of faults in the program. By running the program with test cases and
comparing the result with the expected outcome described in the specification or
generated by a test oracle, the existence of a fault can be detected. However, in spreadsheet programming most spreadsheet programmers do not have the expertise to design
and execute effective test cases. In the absence of a specification and automated test
oracle, the user plays the role of a test oracle and provides the expected outcome during
testing.
The root of spreadsheet programming lies in the definition of formulas. In spreadsheets,
users want to make sure that their spreadsheet formulas are correct with respect to the
actual data that they need for their applications instead of arbitrary data chosen for testing
purposes (this does not include those who develop templates). Hence, the reasonableness
of the computed value is used to judge the validity of the formula. Users usually have a
gut feeling of the range of reasonable values for each given cell.
Interval-based testing is proposed to check the existence of symptoms of faults in formulas, which are defined for numerical computations. Spreadsheets are mainly used for
numerical computations by end users. Hence, we require from the user a vision of the
ranges of possible values of formula computations.
Interval-based testing requires the user to specify for a given spreadsheet on a mirror
image of the sheet intervals expected for the desired input and formula cells respectively.
For numeric input cells, the user specifies the range of reasonable values in the form of
intervals, which serve as input domains. For formula cells, the user specifies the expected
outcome of the formula again in the form of intervals. The prototype system developed in
the context of [3], an add on to spreadsheet packages like MS-Excel, allows also for
selective specification of such expected intervals. It mirrors the user’s sheet by means of
an interval-value sheet containing boundaries within which the spreadsheet user expects
the result of a formula to be. Further, an interval-formula sheet where such boundaries are
derived based on the formulas of the users actual sheet by means of interval arithmetic
applied to the intervals given for input cells is established by the system. The attached
intervals will be stored as strings (since the spreadsheet system used with the prototype
neither supports interval data types nor allows user defined data types) in a behind-thescene spreadsheet using the same cell coordinates as the cells in the ordinary spreadsheet.
Figure 1: Architecture of the prototype supporting the interval-based testing methodology
In figure 1, Ordinary spreadsheet is the usual spreadsheet defined by the user in which
computation is based on discrete values. Expected spreadsheet is a behind-the scene
spreadsheet which contains expected intervals for input and formula cells as given by the
user. For a formula defined at the ordinary spreadsheet, the formula is evaluated based on
the interval values stored in the expected spreadsheet and the resulting interval will be
stored as an interval string in the respective cell in the bounding spreadsheet. In some
cases, a user may not attach input and expected intervals for some input and formula
cells. In such situations, the discrete values of the cells from the ordinary spreadsheet are
used during interval computation as intervals of width zero. The bounding spreadsheet,
which is a behind-the-scene spreadsheet, contains computed bounding interval values. A
bounding interval is an interval computed by the formulas in the users regular spreadsheet with the operators in formula cells replaced by the respective interval operators. It
is used to check the reasonableness of the expected interval specified by the user. Once
the necessary values are available from the three sources, namely, spreadsheet computation, user expectation, and interval computation, the comparator may determine the
existence of symptoms of faults. Whenever there is a discrepancy between spreadsheet
computation, user expectation and interval computation, the comparator marks those cells
with symptoms of faults and those which seem to be correct in different colors. Finally,
among those cells with symptoms of faults which contribute to a faulty cell, the most
influential cell is identified using the fault tracer. A discussion of the fault tracer is the
main subject of this paper.
3. FAULT TRACING BACKGROUND
Once symptoms of faults are detected, the next task is to find the location of the actual
faults. A testing system cannot exactly indicate the location of faults; it rather provides a
hint or a symptom of a fault. However, a testing system can facilitate the search for the
location of faults by providing testing information about the possible paths that lead to
the likely fault location. A symptom of fault is a signal indicating the existence of a
possible fault. A symptom of fault is generated whenever there is a discrepancy between
the expected behavior of a program and its actual behavior. Fault tracing is the process of
identifying the location of faults in a program. In the following sections, we discuss the
process of debugging conventional software and spreadsheet debugging.
3.1 Debugging conventional software
Generally, fault tracing in conventional software debugging involves program slicing
techniques to minimize the search for the potential faults [1, 2, 8, 11].
The first important information needed in fault tracing is to compute a static backward
slice. It contains all variables that may affect the variable at which a symptom of fault is
detected at a given statement. Since a symptom of fault is generated based on a particular
test case, those variables, which are directly and/or indirectly involved in the current
computation will contain the statement producing the faulty variable provided that the
fault is not due to missing statements. This requires the computation of dynamic
backward slices. In order to reach the potential faulty variables, further reduction of the
dynamic backward slice should be made using the technique of dicing.
Dicing is carried out by removing the sub-slice corresponding to correct variables.
However, the use of dicing imposes some preconditions to be satisfied in order for the
resulting dice to contain the fault [12]. For example, dicing assumes that only one faulty
variable exists in the dynamic backward slice. In addition, it assumes that if a variable is
faulty then all variables in the dynamic forward slice of that variable are faulty. This
misses situations where faults compensate within the slice. Hence, the general process of
fault tracing in conventional software can be described as follows.
Static slice → Dynamic slice → Dice → Potential location of fault
3.2 Spreadsheet debugging
The problem in spreadsheet debugging is: given a formula cell with a symptom of fault
but not having a fault in the formula, how to identify the faulty cell among those cells on
which the given cell directly and/or indirectly depends. Since this analysis shows only
cells with deviations between discrete and interval computations, we can only cautiously
speak of symptoms of faults. The deviating cells might well result from propagations. In
some cases, a symptom of fault can be generated even though there is no fault in the
formula. This happens when the user expectation is specified incorrectly and due to
propagation of faulty values.
As the conceptual view of a spreadsheet program is based on data dependency relations,
spreadsheets can be considered as dataflow driven. On the other hand the conceptual
view of a procedural program is control flow-driven. In spite of this difference, a similar
procedure to conventional software debugging can be used for fault tracing in
spreadsheets. Therefore, the notion of a slice is not directly applicable. We have rather a
set of cells linked just by dataflow connection. Nevertheless, for the sake of comparison,
we refer to this set as slice. However, in our approach we do not impose the requirement
that the dynamic backward slice contains only one faulty cell. There can be several cells
in the dynamic backward slice of a faulty cell which are marked as faulty. Cell marking is
performed based on the result of the comparison made by the comparator as described in
section 2. The fault tracing procedure uses the backward slice and the cell marks recorded
by the interval-based testing system.
The fault localization technique, proposed by DeMillo et al. [8], was based on the
analysis of the steps used by programmers experienced in debugging. Following a similar
procedure, the spreadsheet fault tracing process contains the following steps:
1. Determine the cells (directly and/or indirectly) involved in the computation of an
incorrect formula (i.e., look backward)
2. Select suspicious cells
3. Form hypotheses about suspicious cells
Step 1 requires the computation of ”backward slices” with respect to a faulty cell for
which we want to locate the source of the fault. Step 2 requires the identification of those
cells, which have a likelihood of propagating faults through the data flow. These cells are
marked by the comparator during the verification process. The comparator determines the
existence of a symptom of a fault for a formula cell by comparing the usual spreadsheet
computation, user expectation, and interval computation (see figure 1). Step 3 requires
reasoning about the most influential cell. In other words, this step involves the computation of the priority values for the suspicious cells and the identification of the one,
which has the highest likelihood of contributing to the faulty cells in the dynamic
backward slice.
If the fault is local, i.e., either the formula or the expected interval of the given cell is
specified incorrectly, then the fault can be fixed by examining the faulty cell itself. If the
fault is not local, we are looking for the most influential cell. The assumption in this
approach is that if the most influential faulty cell is found, then correcting this cell may
correct many of the dependent faulty cells in the data dependency graph, thereby
reducing the remaining task of the spreadsheet debugging process. To address this
problem, we propose an approach using priority setting based on the number of incorrect
precedents and dependents. To do so, we rely on the dynamic backward slice of a given
faulty cell as we are dealing with propagated faults.
A similar approach was proposed by Reichwein et al. [21] for debugging Form/3
programs. In this approach, a user marks cells as correct and incorrect and based on the
all-uses dataflow test adequacy criterion, the degree of testedness of formulas is compu-
ted. Cells are given different colors based on their degree of testedness. Fault tracing is
performed based on the degree of testedness of cells and by computing the fault
likelihood of cells. Fault likelihood is computed based on the number of correct and
incorrect dependents of a cell. During the fault localization process, for the cell under
consideration, the cells in the dynamic backward slice will be highlighted in different
colors based on their degree of testedness. The further process of fault localization is
carried out by performing testing using additional test cases. This approach requires the
user to provide different test cases to localize the faulty cell. The work proposed by Chen
and Chan [6] presented a model for spreadsheet debugging. This work described the
cognitive aspects of spreadsheet debugging and provided the essential episodes, which
could be applied to the debugging process in spreadsheets.
Our approach does not require the user to provide different test cases since we cannot
assume a sufficient testing discipline. As users are working on actual data that they need
for their applications, it is likely that they need to know the correctness of their
spreadsheets based on the actual data instead of arbitrary data chosen just for testing
purposes. The fault tracing approach presented here requires the computation of priority
values based on the verification status of precedent cells. If this is not sufficiently
discriminating the priority values are also based on dependent cells.
4. FAULT TRACING STRATEGY
This section describes how the fault tracing approach works and presents an example to
illustrate the approach. Finally, a fault tracing algorithm is provided.
The fault tracing strategy proposed uses information from different sources to locate the
most influential faulty cell. The first information that we need is the dataflow information. This information is already available since it is used by the spreadsheet system
during the evaluation of formulas. For example, in Microsoft Excel, this information is
used by its built-in auditing tool to show the backward and forward slices of cells of
interest one level at a time. While traversing the backward slice, we need a mechanism of
selecting the cells, which have a likelihood of being the most influential faulty cells. This
information can be obtained from the testing system as cells are marked with different
colors depending on the existence of symptoms of faults. Hence, cell marks are used to
guide the search process. During traversing the backward slice, the verification status of
cells is used to guide the search to the path where the most influential faulty cell may be
located
4.1 Search for the most influential faulty cell
During the verification process, cells in a spreadsheet are categorized into three groups.
These are cells with symptoms of faults, cells without symptoms of faults, and cells,
which are unchecked. Those cells with symptoms of faults are of interest during the
process of identifying the most influential faulty cell(s). The search for the most
influential faulty cell(s) of a given cell is based on the number of faulty precedents and
the contribution of the faulty precedents to incorrect dependents. A cell, which has many
faulty precedents, is more likely to contain the most influential cell(s) than the one with
few faulty precedents. In addition, a faulty cell, which has more incorrect dependents, is
more influential than the one with few incorrect dependents. Furthermore, those faulty
cells, which are at a higher level of the data dependency graph (i.e., near the input cells)
are more influential than those at the lower level of the data dependency graph.
Therefore, correcting faulty cells at the highest level of the data dependency graph may
correct cells showing incorrect values (without being actually faulty), which are
dependent on the corrected cell thereby reducing the effort of the debugging process.
4.2 An example
Let us consider the cost calculation spreadsheet shown in figure 2(a). Figure 2(e) depicts
the spreadsheet with those cells, which have symptoms of faults highlighted. Those cells,
which have symptoms of faults, are shaded red by the interval-based testing system (dark
in this paper) and those without symptoms of faults are shaded yellow (light grey in this
paper). For a demonstration purpose, intervals were attached only for cells in column D
and hence verification is done only for this column.
Suppose the user wants to trace the most influential faulty cell for the final result of the
computation in cell D9. Actually, the first thing to examine is the faulty cell itself. If the
formula and the expected interval attached are correct, then the fault is due to referencing
a faulty cell. In such cases, we need to trace the source of the fault.
In the example given, the task in column D was to compute the personal cost based on the
fixed amount given in cell D4 for each location. However, the user made a referencing
error. Cell D4 should have been used as an absolute reference in the formula of D5 as it is
copied downward. An error of referencing will have an effect on the copies and not on
the source. As a result, the cells D6, D7, and D9 are marked as faulty.
The direct precedents of cell D9 are cells D5, D6, and D7 (see figure 3). The direct
precedents fall into the two categories: correct (those without symptoms of faults) and
faulty. The faulty category, which contains cells D6 and D7, is the candidate for further
investigation. The next task is to identify which one of D6 and D7 contains the most
influential faulty cell. Since they have equal verification status, we check the number of
their faulty direct precedents and dependents. D6 has no faulty precedents but D7 has one
faulty precedent, D6. Therefore, the path to D7 should be followed to locate the most
influential faulty cell. Next, we check the faulty precedents of D7. It has only one
precedent cell, D6, which is marked as faulty. Among the precedents of D6, there is no
faulty precedent.
Therefore, cell D6 is considered to be the most influential faulty cell and as a result,
whenever the user requests for the most influential faulty cell for cell D9, the system
highlights the cell D6. However, if two or more faulty cells have equal number of faulty
direct precedents, then we need to consider also the number of their direct dependents.
While using the number of faulty direct dependents, there are two possibilities to
consider.
• the number of faulty direct dependents combined with the number of faulty direct
precedents
• the number of faulty direct dependents when the number of faulty direct
precedents are equal
(a) Cost computation
(b) Formula view
(c) Expected spreadsheet
(d) Bounding spreadsheet
(e) A spreadsheet with symptom of faults
Figure 2: Interval-based testing in action
Figure 3: Data dependency graph for cell D9
If we use the first choice, we may find the most influential cell without going far in
the data dependency graph. This influential cell may not be the most influential for
the faulty cell under consideration but it contributes to many other faulty dependent
cells. Therefore, correcting this cell may also correct many other cells, which are not
in the dynamic backward slice of the cell under consideration. This option identifies
the most influential cell in terms of the number of incorrect dependents of a cell. If
we use the second choice, then we can reach to the most influential cell with respect
to the cell under consideration, which is at a higher level in the data dependency
graph. Therefore, correcting this cell may correct many cells in the dynamic backward slice of the cell under consideration. Though both options provide the possibility of correcting many cells, we prefer to locate the most influential cell using the
second option as this identifies the most influential cell for the cells in the dynamic
backward slice. In the case where two or more faulty cells have equal number of
faulty precedents and dependents, one of them will be chosen arbitrarily.
4.3 Fault tracing algorithm
The algorithm for identifying the most influential faulty cell is presented in algorithm 1
for propagated faults. Let Ce be the erroneous cell we are interested in to identify it’s
most influential faulty cell(s).
Algorithm 1: Algorithm to identify the most influential faulty cell
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
GE = {Ci|Ci is a direct precedent of Ce and Ci has a symptom of fault}.
If GE =∅, then Ce is the most influential faulty cell and stop.
Compute the faulty direct precedents of elements of GE.
GEEi = {Cij| Cij is a direct precedent of Ci and Cij has a symptom of fault}.
Extract precedents with maximal number of second order precedents
GGEE = {Ci such that |GEEi| is maximal}.
If GGEE is singleton, repeat from step 1 with Ce ∈ GGEE.
If |GGEE| > 1 compute the faulty direct dependents of Ci.
GEDi = {Dij |Dij depends on Ci and Dij has a symptom of fault}.
Extract precedents with maximal number of second order precedents and
maximum number of dependents
GED = {Ci|Ci ∈ GGEE and |GEDi| is maximal}
If GED is singleton, repeat from steps 1 with Ce ∈ GED.
If |GED| > 1 take arbitrarily Ci ∈ GED and repeat from step 1.
Thus, departing from erroneous cell Ce, first a section of the backward slice is computed
in such a way that at each step, one aims to reduce a branching slice to the most
promising singleton (steps 1 to 5). If this attempt terminates in a situation where the
algorithm cannot decide which cell in a set of faulty candidates is most influential, it
changes direction and computes the forward slice from the respective dependents, assuming that the root having most dependents is the one the user should look at first.
5. CONCLUSION
Debugging involves the identification of the location of the actual faults and fixing the
faults given testing revealed some incorrect values. Since most spreadsheets are not
produced by software professionals, this process calls for machine support. In
spreadsheets, the identification of cells with symptoms of faults and those without
symptoms of faults is carried out by the testing system (i.e., interval-based testing).
As spreadsheets are dataflow-driven, faults are propagated in the direction of the
dataflow. Therefore, we need a mechanism of identifying the most influential faulty cell
in the data dependency graph against the direction of the data flow, so that correcting it
may correct many cells in the data dependency graph thereby simplifying the debugging
process.
In this paper, we have presented a technique for the identification of the most influential
faulty cell(s) for a given faulty cell, which has a propagated fault. Unlike conventional
software fault localization techniques, which apply dicing, we do not limit the number of
faulty cells in the dynamic backward slice of the cell under consideration to one. Several
cells with symptoms of faults can appear in the analog of a dynamic backward slice of a
given faulty cell. For the identification of the most influential faulty cells, the fault
tracing strategy uses the dataflow information, which is available from the spreadsheet
language and the cell marks obtained from the testing system. Path selection is based on
the number of faulty precedent and dependent cells.
6. REFERENCES
[1] H. Agrawal, R. A. DeMillo, and E. H. Spafford. Debugging with Dynamic Slicing
and Backtracking. Software Practice & Experience, 23(6):589–616, June 1993.
[2] H. Agrawal, J. R. Horgan, S. London, and W. E. Wong. Fault Localization using
Execution Slices and Dataflow Tests. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium
on Software Reliability Engineering, pages 143–151, October 1995
[3] Y. Ayalew. Spreadsheet Testing Using Interval Analysis. PhD thesis, Klagenfurt
University, November 2001.
[4] Y. Ayalew, M. Clermont, and R. T. Mittermeir. Detecting Errors in Spreadsheets.
Proceedings of EuSpRIG 2000 Symposium Spreadsheet Risks, Audit & Development
Methods, pages 51–62, July 2000.
[5] P. S. Brown and J. D. Gould. An Experimental Study of People Creating Spreadsheets. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems , 5(3):258–272, July 1987.
[6] Y. Chen and H. C. Chan. An Exploratory Study of Spreadsheet Debugging Processes.
The 4th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pages 143–155, 2000.
[7] E. H. Chi. A Framework for Information Visualization Spreadsheets. PhD thesis,
University of Minnesota, March 1999.
[8] R. A. DeMillo, H. Pan, and E. H. Spafford. Critical Slicing for Software Fault Localization. International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 121–134,
January 1996.
[9] M. Clermont, C. Hanin, and R. Mittermeir. A Spreadsheet Auditing Tool Evaluated in
an Industrial Context. Proc. Spreadsheet Risks, Audit and Development Methods, vol
3, pages 35 – 46, EUSPRIG, July 2002.
[10] S. E. Hudson. User Interface Specification Using an Enhanced Spreadsheet Model.
ACM Transactions on Graphics, pages 209–239, 1994.
[11] B. Korel and J. Rilling. Application of Dynamic Slicing in Program Debugging.
Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Automatic Debugging, pages 43–
57, May 1997.
[12] J. R. Lyle and M. Weiser. Automatic program bug location by program slicing.
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computers and Applications,
pages 877–883, June 1987.
[13] R. Mittermeir, M. Clermont, and Y. Ayalew. User-Centered Approaches for Improving Spreadsheet Quality. Technical Report ISYS-MCA-2000-01, Institute for Informatics-Systems, University of Klagenfurt, August 2000.
[14] B. A. Nardi and J. R. Miller. The Spreadsheet Interface: A Basis for End User Programming.Technical Report HPL-90-08, Hewlett-Packard Software Technology
Laboratory, March 1990.
[15] R. R. Panko. What we Know About Spreadsheet Errors. Journal of End User
Computing: Special issue on Scaling Up End User Development, 10(2):15–21, 1998.
[16] R. R. Panko. Applying code inspection to spreadsheet testing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2):159–176, 1999.
[17] R. R. Panko. Spreadsheet Errors: What We Know.What We Think We Can Do.
Proceedings of EuSpRIG Symposium Spreadsheet Risks, Audit & Development
Methods, pages 7–14, July 2000.
[18] R. R. Panko. Two Corpuses of Spreadsheet Errors.Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.
[19] R. R. Panko and R. P. Halverson. Spreadsheets on Trial: A Survey of Research on
Spreadsheet Risks.Proceedings of the 29th Hawaii International Conference on
System Sciences, pages 326–335, January 1996.
[20] R. R. Panko and R. H. Sprague. Hitting the wall: Errors in developing and code
inspecting a ’simple’ spreadsheet model. Decision Support Systems , 22(4):337–353,
April 1998.
[21] J. Reichwein, G. Rothermel, and M. Burnett. Slicing Spreadsheets: An Integrated
Methodology for Spreadsheet Testing and Debugging. Proceedings of the 2nd
Conference on Domain Specific Languages, pages 25–38, October 1999.
[22] A. G. Yoder and D. L. Cohn. Architectural Issues in Spreadsheet Languages.
International Conference on Programming Languages and System Architectures,
March 1993.
[23] A. G. Yoder and D. L. Cohn. Real Spreadsheets for Real Programmers. International Conference on Computer Languages, pages 20–30, May 1994.
[24] Y. Ayalew and R. Mittermeir. Interval-based Testing for Spreadsheets, Proceedings of International Arab Conference on Information Technology, pages 414 – 422, December, 2002.
| 6cs.PL
|
arXiv:1508.04753v1 [cs.PL] 18 Aug 2015
Cold Object Identification in the Java Virtual
Machine
Kim T. Briggs∗, Baoguo Zhou†, Gerhard W. Dueck‡
August 20, 2015
Abstract
Many Java applications instantiate objects within the Java heap that
are persistent but seldom if ever referenced by the application. Examples
include strings, such as error messages, and collections of value objects
that are preloaded for fast access but they may include objects that are
seldom referenced. This paper describes a stack-based framework for detecting these “cold” objects at runtime, with a view to marshaling and
sequestering them in designated regions of the heap where they may be
preferentially paged out to a backing store, thereby freeing physical memory pages for occupation by more active objects. Furthermore, we evaluate
the correctness and efficiency of stack-based approach with an Access Barrier. The experimental results from a series of SPECjvm2008 benchmarks
are presented.
For submission to ‘Software: Practice and Experience’
1
Introduction
Long-running Java applications [7], such as web servers and network security
monitors, may preload and retain large numbers of objects within the Java
heap [10] in order to allow fast application access at runtime. In many cases,
some of these objects are infrequently referenced by the application. We refer
to these objects, which are persistent in the Java heap but seldom referenced,
as cold objects.
The presence of cold objects in the heap is problematic insofar as they may be
collocated in virtual memory [12] with more active objects. Any page of virtual
memory that contains all or part of a cold object may also contain parts of more
active objects, and application references to the active objects will prevent the
∗ IBM
Canada, 770 Palladium Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada, E-mail: [email protected]
of Computer Science, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, E3B 5A3, N.B.,
Canada, E-mail: [email protected]
‡ Faculty of Computer Science, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, E3B 5A3, N.B.,
Canada, E-mail: [email protected]
† Faculty
1
page from being swapped out of virtual memory. As a result, large applications
that commit most or all of the available physical memory may experience undue
memory pressure. Additionally, active objects and cold objects are co-located,
when active objects are accessed, both active objects and cold objects might be
loaded into cache at the same time, actually cold objects will not be accessed.
Therefore, cold objects will degrade the cache-hit performance.
If cold objects are collected and moved to cold regions, both page fault and
cache-miss performance could be decreased. Furthermore, cold regions can be
excluded from Garbage Collection (GC) [10], if they contain only leaf objects
and primitive arrays. Therefore, pause times caused by the GC can be reduced
as well.
As the cold area becomes populated with cold objects, operating system
primitives such as madvise() [11] may be used to inform the operating system
that pages mapped to the cold area may preferentially be swapped out of resident memory, thereby freeing those pages for occupation by more active objects.
The cold area can then be monitored, for example, with continuous reference
sampling and periodic calls to mincore(), to detect when presumed cold objects
become active and to take appropriate action.
Management of cold objects is most relevant in the context of long-running
applications with large heap requirements. For that reason, the balanced garbage
collection [2, 1, 15] (GC) framework was selected as a basis for investigating cold
object management. The balanced collector improves application performance
by partitioning the heap into a large number of regions of equal size and limiting
the number of regions that are included for collection in partial GC cycles. This
reduces the frequency of more time-consuming global GC cycles, which involve
all heap regions.
In this paper, we present a stack-based framework to identify cold objects. Cold objects have been identified and harvested successfully in many
SPECjvm2008 [16, 17] applications. At the same time, we evaluate the correctness and efficiency of stack-based solution with an Access Barrier mechanism [14]. All experiments are performed on IBM’s J9 Virtual Machine (JVM) [3].
2
Stack-Based Cold Object Identification Framework
A stack-based framework is used to identify and harvest cold objects. The
framework supports identification and collection of cold objects. The main idea
of the measurement of cold objects is to periodically walk thread-local stacks
and mark active references. Whenever a Java method is invoked, a new stack
frame will be generated. Since local variables and passed arguments [7] will be
stored in the stack frame, object references corresponding to local variables and
passed arguments in the current stack frame are considered to be active. After
a period of time when no new active objects are being discovered, subtraction
of the collection of objects found to be active from the collection of live objects
2
reveals the collection of live, inactive (cold) objects. Once they have been identified, cold objects can be harvested form the main heap and sequestered in a
designated cold area.
2.1
Cold Region Reservation and Instrumentation
When the JVM [10] starts, a preset number of contiguous regions are reserved
for the cold area. Cold regions are excluded from copy forward and compaction
during partial GC [15] cycles, except to receive objects that have been identified
as cold and copied from pinned regions, as described below.
In order to preclude the need to traverse cold regions during mark/sweep [9,
18] actions, only arrays of primitive data (eg, char[]) and leaf objects (objects
with no reference-valued fields) are considered as collectible cold objects. This
constraint, in conjunction with the leaf object optimization feature available in
the IBM Java virtual machine [3], ensures that objects within cold regions can
be correctly marked but not touched by the marking scheme. This constraint
can be relaxed to include Java objects that contain only primitive-valued fields.
Objects that have been sequestered in cold regions are monitored for reference activity. To that end, each cold region is instrumented with an activity
map containing one bit per potential object location within the region, as for
the collector’s mark map. The stacks of all mutator threads are periodically
walked to collect active heap references. Any mutator reference to an object
within a cold region is marked by setting the corresponding bit in the activity
map.
The number and total size of objects that are sequestered in the cold area
and the incidence of activity involving these objects are the main outcomes of
interest for this paper.
2.2
Pinned Region Selection and Instrumentation
When marking active objects on the heap, since objects might be moved by copyforward or compaction [5] of the GC, some regions are selected to be pinned.
Pinned regions are excluded from partial GC collection sets [10] sets. That
means objects in the pinned region will not move, which facilitates tracking and
marking active objects.
The balanced garbage collector [1] assigns a logical age to each heap region,
which reflects the number of GC cycles that the contained objects have survived.
Allocations of new objects occur in the youngest regions (age 0), and persistent
objects are progressively copied forward into increasingly older regions until
they are copied into tenured regions (age 24). In the balanced GC, tenured
regions are excluded from partial GC collection sets.
In order to enable detection of cold objects, a number of tenured regions
are first pinned so that they are excluded from partial GC collection sets [15]
cycles. This ensures that objects contained within pinned regions maintain
a fixed location within the mutator address space. Pinned regions are also
instrumented with activity maps to record which objects have been sampled
3
from mutator stacks. Cold objects can be identified within a pinned region,
after a preset amount of time Tcold has elapsed since the most recent setting (0
→ 1) of an activity bit, by subtracting the activity map from the mark map.
2.2.1
Pinned Region Selection.
The region pinning framework partitions the regions of the balanced GC heap
into four collections:
1. Young regions (age < 24)
2. Unpinned regions (age 24, not pinned)
3. Pinned regions (age 24, pinned)
4. Cold regions (the cold area)
Unpinned regions are considered for pinning at the end of each partial GC
cycle. They are selectable if they have an allocation density d (ratio of allocated
bytes to region size R) exceeding a preset threshold Dhi . Additionally, the
total size of potentially collectible cold objects contained in the region must be
greater than 0.01R. Selectable regions are ranked at the end of each partial GC
cycle according to the region pinning metric value P that reflects the volume of
activity in each region:
P = mma(r) ∗ d
(1)
where r is the number of mutator references to contained objects since the end
of the previous partial GC cycle, r reflects the object activity in the region since
any reference that is found on the stack frame is considered to be active. The
mma(r) is the modified moving average of r with a smoothing factor of 0.875:
(7 ∗ mma(rn−1 ) + rn )
,n > 0
(2)
8
The maximum number of regions that may be pinned at any time is determined by a preset parameter Pmax . At the end of every partial GC cycle, if the
number of currently pinned regions n is less than Pmax , up to Pmax n selectable
regions may be pinned.
Two strategies for selecting regions for pinning were implemented. The
pinning strategy is determined by a JVM parameter that is interpreted when the
JVM starts and remains fixed while the mutator runs. With selective pinning,
only the most active selectable regions are pinned. An active selectable region
must satisfy mma(r) > r > 0 and sum(r) > R, where sum(r) is the sum of
r over all previous partial GC cycles. The average pinning metric value Pavg
from the collection of all selectable regions with non-zero pinning metric value is
computed and only regions satisfying P > Pavg are selectable for pinning. The
activity maps for these regions should converge more quickly and cold object
identification should be more accurate after a period (Tcold ) of quiescence.
mma(r0 ) = 0; mma(rn ) =
4
The alternative pinning strategy, unselective pinning, pins in decreasing order of pinned metric value selectable tenured regions up to a preset maximum
(Pmax ). Cold objects will be found only in tenured regions that persist in the
heap. Unselective pinning should converge to a pinned region collection that
contains all of these regions.
In either case, pinned regions are unpinned, at the end of every partial GC
cycle, if their density falls below a preset low density threshold Dlo , the total
mass of eligible objects (primitive arrays) falls below 0.01R, or they survive a
period of inactivity > Tcold and the contained collectible cold objects are moved
into the cold area.
All pinned regions are unpinned at the start of a global GC cycle, or when
the cold area becomes full. Pinning is resumed after the global GC completes
or when space becomes available in the cold area.
2.2.2
Pinned Region Instrumentation.
When a region is pinned, it is instrumented with an activity map to track
reference activity within the region. The activity map contains an activity bit
for each mark bit. Activity bits are initially 0 and are set when a reference to the
corresponding object is sampled. The region is also walked to assess the number
of marked objects nmarked , the number of marked collectible objects ncollectible ,
and the respective total sizes mmarked and mcollectible of these collections.
Three timestamps are maintained to record the time tpinned at which the
region was pinned, the time tinactive of the most recent setting of an activity bit,
and the time twalked that the region was most recently walked. Pinned regions
are walked, and twalked is updated to the current time t, whenever t − twalked >
Tcold /4. Current values for nmarked , mcollectible , mmarked , mcollectible , and d are
obtained each time the region is walked.
Over time, the rate at which activity bits are set will diminish, until a period
of time > Tcold has elapsed with no new activity bits set. The collectible cold
objects in this region can then be identified and copied into the cold area.
2.2.3
Mutator Thread Instrumentation.
The primary sources for reference collection are the mutator stacks, which are
periodically walked down from the top-most frame until a frame that has not
been active since the most recent stack walk. Frame equality is determined on
the basis of the frame base pointer and a hash of the stack contents between
the frame base and stack pointers. Each mutator thread is instrumented with a
fixed-length buffer for reference collection and two arrays of stack frame traces–
one to hold traces from the most recent stack walk and one to hold traces from
the current stack walk.
References from each active frame are added to the mutator’s reference
buffer. Stack walks are discontinued if the reference buffer overflows (collected
references are retained for activity map updates). If the stack frame buffer for
the current stack overflows, the mutator continues to walk the stack and collect
5
references while matching current frame base pointer and hash against the previous stack until a match is found. The next previous stack is then composed
from the head of the current stack and the tail of the previous stack. Any missing frames between these stack segments are of little consequence–if the next
stack walk continues past the end of the head segment it will fall through to
the tail segment and eventually find a match, and setting the activity bits for
redundant samples collected from frames with missing traces is idempotent.
In addition, two timestamps wstart and wend are maintained for each mutator thread to record the start and end times of the most recent stack walk.
References collected from stack walks started before the most recent GC cycle
are discarded.
2.2.4
Activity Sampling Daemon.
When the JVM is initialized, a thread activity sampling daemon is started to
control reference activity sampling when mutator threads are executing and to
harvest references collected by mutator threads.
The daemon thread remains in a paused state during GC cycles. Between
GC cycles the daemon interacts with mutator threads by polling each active
mutator thread at approximately 1 millisecond intervals. During each polling
cycle, the daemon instruments each previously uninstrumented mutator thread
and signals it to start a stack walk. It harvests collected reference samples from
previously instrumented mutator threads that have completed a stack walk and
signals these threads to start a new stack walk. Mutator threads receive these
signals and commence the stack walk at their safe point [8].
For each harvested reference sample the daemon increments the reference
activity counter r for the containing region (young, pinned, unpinned, or cold).
Additionally, if the referenced object is contained in a pinned or cold region,
the daemon sets the corresponding bit in the region’s activity map. No explicit
synchronization is required to set or test the activity bits, since they are set
only on the daemon thread and tested only on the master GC thread, and these
threads never access region activity maps concurrently.
2.2.5
Cold Object Collection.
The region pinning framework attempts to pin a collection of tenured regions
that contains as much of the mutator’s active working set as possible. This
may seem counterintuitive, given that we are attempting to identify persistent
objects that are almost never in the working set. Cold object identification is
like looking for shadows in a windowless room—they are easier to see when the
lights are turned on. Pinning the most active regions is expected to reduce the
likelihood of identifying as cold objects that are actually just dormant in the
context of current mutator activity. For pinned regions that are receiving few
active references all or most objects would be identified as cold under a fixed
Tcold threshold.
6
In the presence of high reference activity, the activity map of a pinned region
can be expected to converge more quickly to a stable state where no new activity
bits are being set. After a fixed time Tcold has elapsed since the last change
to the state of the activity map, the pinned region will be included in the copy
forward collection set for the next partial GC cycle, if the pinned region has an
accurate remembered set card list and no critical regions in use. When a pinned
region is included in the copy forward collection set, collectible cold objects are
copied into the next available cold region while all other objects are copied into
other unpinned regions. After all objects have been copied out the region is
unpinned.
Cold regions are instrumented as for pinned regions in order to allow reference activity to be tracked. At present, all objects that are copied to cold
regions remain in the cold area, without compaction or copying, until they are
collected as garbage or the mutator terminates.
3
JVM PROFILING CONFIGURATIONS
All JVMs were compiled with gcc version 4.4.7 with optimization enabled (-O3).
Two JVMs were produced for profiling:
1. linux: generic JVM with no reference sampling.
2. ssd-stack: stack sampling enabled.
The JVM run configurations are shown in (Table 1).
Table 1: Running parameters
JVM
linux
ssd-stack
ssd-stack
Pinning strategy
none
selective
unselective
JIT
enabled
enabled
enabled
Run time(s)
9600 x 2
9600 x 2
9600 x 2
Tcold(s)
900
900
900
The linux and ssd-stack JVMs were each run twice with the Just-in-Time [4,
6] compiler (JIT) enabled. The only data of interest from the second runs were
the SPECjvm2008 benchmark scores, which were the basis for comparison of
overall performance of the linux versus ssd-stack JVMs. The ssd stack JVM
was run in two modes – selective or unselective pinning – in order to permit
comparison of cold object identification between these region pinning strategies.
Four SPECjvm2008 [16] benchmarks (compiler.compiler, derby, xml.transform,
xml.validation) were selected for profiling. The linux JVM was executed twice
for each benchmark. The ssd-stack JVMs ran each benchmark twice with selective pinning and twice with unselective pinning. Each profiling run executed a
single iteration of one benchmark for 9600 seconds. Sampling interval is 1 ms,
and Tcold is 15 minutes.
7
All profiling runs were performed on a 1.8GHz 8 Core/16 Thread (Xeon)
server running CentOS version 6.4. No other user applications were active
during any of the profiling runs.
4
RESULTS
The first three JVM run configurations from Table 1 (linux, ssd-stack/selective
pinning, ssd-stack/unselective pinning) were used to determine the runtime heap
characteristics of each SPECjvm2008 benchmark and to allow performance comparisons between the linux and ssd-stack JVMs. Heap characteristics most
salient to cold object identification with activity tracking are the numbers of
tenured regions and the distributions of mutator activity within young, unpinned, and pinned regions.
4.1
SPECjvm2008 Scores versus Linux
Runtime performance of the ssd-stack JVMs (selective and unselective pinning) versus the linux JVM was assessed using SPECjvm2008 [16] scores for
two runs of each benchmark: compiler.compiler, derby, xml.transform, and
xml.validation. The resulting benchmark scores are plotted in Figure 1.
(a) Compiler.compiler score
(b) Derby score
(c) xml.transform score
(d) xml.validate score
Figure 1: Running performance of the ssd-stack JVMs
Performance degradation was calculated as the ratio of the difference between the linux and ssd-stack scores to the linux score. The overall average
performance degradation for the ssd stack JVMs was 0.04 (4%). Performance
8
degradation ratios versus linux for all runs of the ssd stack JVMs are listed in
Table 2.
Table 2: Overhead caused by the feature of cold objects
Pinning strategy
Benchmark run
compiler.compiler
derby
xml.transform
xml.validation
4.2
1
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.04
selective
2
0.05
0.02
0.06
0.03
1
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.06
unselective
2
0.06
0.03
0.07
0.03
Garbage Collection Metrics versus Linux
Summary garbage collector metrics are shown in Table 3 for all benchmark
runs with the linux JVM and the ssd-stack JVM with unselective and selective
pinning. Compaction times were significantly lower for all of the ssd-stack JVM
runs with the compiler.compiler benchmark. Considering the average total GC
times for each pair of runs, compiler.compiler had slightly better total GC times
for ssd-stack unselective and selective pinning compared to linux (4% and 2%
lower, respectively), as did xml.transform (4% and 5%). Average total GC times
were slightly worse for derby (4% and <1% higher than linux) and xml.validation
(2%, 2%). Much of the ssd stack GC overhead is incurred in compiling pinned
region and cold collection statistics and streaming them to a printable log file.
These statistics are informative only and can be suppressed to reduce overhead.
4.3
Region Age and Activity
Figures 2a-2b represent the relative region counts (greyscale, left axis, percentage of total marked region count) and reference counts (colored lines, right axis,
proportion of total reference count) for the young, unpinned, and pinned parts
of the heap after each partial GC cycle. Plots are presented for unselective and
selective pinning for each benchmark executed with the ssd stack JVM, using
data collected from the first of two runs. Partial GC cycle counts are represented
on the horizontal axes.
The compiler.compiler benchmark (Figures 2a, 2b) was atypical in that it
showed a predominance of young regions (over 90% of marked regions) that
receive a relatively high proportion (almost 0.2) of reference activity. The other
benchmarks (Figures 3a − 5b) all showed a predominance of unpinned and
pinned regions that receive almost all reference activity. Regardless of pinning
strategy, they also showed a tendency for an initially high concentration of
reference activity within pinned regions that diminished over time. This is
not surprising since both pinning strategies favor selection of regions receiving
high reference activity. The activity maps of pinned regions with high reference
activity tend to converge relatively quickly. Most regions are pinned early in the
mutator lifecycle and remain pinned until they are cold collected, their contents
9
Table 3: GC metrics (in ms)
compile.compile
linux-r1
linux-r2
unselective-r1
unselective-r2
selective-r1
selective-r2
derby
linux-r1
linux-r2
unselective-r1
unselective-r2
selective-r1
selective-r2
xml.transform
linux-r1
linux-r2
unselective-r1
unselective-r2
selective-r1
ssd-selective-r2
xml.validation
linux-r1
linux-r2
unselective-r1
unselective-r2
selective-r1
selective-r2
Compact
244
339
31
99
35
37
Compact
12,147
8,252
12,998
13,222
10,879
10,000
Compact
37
31
30
31
31
39
Compact
35
97
33
36
30
35
Copyforward
3,517,715
3,442,073
3,401,260
3,314,364
3,445,347
3,405,924
Copyforward
587,707
581,722
608,385
598,226
570,283
598,301
Copyforward
375,820
376,827
362,166
357,149
359,097
353,823
Copyforward
707,832
726,825
742,721
725,050
730,070
725,577
Glb. mrk
33
38
35
31
38
33
Glb. mrk
40
35
36
34
38
44
Glb. mrk
40
39
35
32
32
34
Glb. mrk
33
38
41
29
39
36
Incr. mark
1,166,619
1,157,656
1,112,495
1,088,048
1,128,614
1,112,630
Incr. mark
2,884
2,916
2,856
2,768
3,030
2,860
Incr.
761
773
799
814
847
813
Incr. mark
872
952
611
786
958
907
Sweep
54,731
55,105
52,078
51,770
52,869
51,835
Sweep
2,552
2,051
2,569
2,507
2,483
2,217
Sweep
342
327
328
360
362
372
Sweep
283
306
236
269
292
274
Total
4,739,401
4,655,271
4,565,965
4,454,374
4,626,962
4,570,519
Total
605,641
595,282
627,179
617,069
587,038
613,744
Total
377,126
378,127
363,486
358,513
360,498
355,211
Total
709,135
728,299
743,722
726,251
731,468
726,909
become dereferenced, or the mutator ends. When they are cold collected the
remaining objects, active or not collectible, are redistributed to other unpinned
regions, so that active objects tend to become more diffusely scattered over
time.
Most of the abrupt drops in reference activity in Figures 3a and 3b coincide
with cold collection, while increases tend to be associated with region pinning
events. For the compiler.compiler benchmark most of the variability in region
counts involved young regions. For the other benchmarks most of the variability
involved unpinned regions. For all benchmarks the pinned region count was
relatively stable, although more replacement occurred with unselective pinning.
Ideally, pinned regions selection should result in a higher proportion of reference activity within pinned regions. Also, this should be realized by pinning
as few regions as possible. By that measure, selective pinning outperformed unselective pinning for the compiler.compiler and xml.validation benchmarks and
slightly underperformed for derby and xml.transform.
The compiler.compiler workload mainly involves younger regions. It pro-
10
(a) Compiler.compiler,
Pinning
Unselective (b) Compiler.compiler, Selective Pinning
Figure 2: Compiler.compiler Activity
duced on average about 49 tenured regions, and most of these persisted for the
duration of the run. With unselective pinning (Figure 2a) about 32 regions were
typically pinned and they received about 33% of reference activity on average.
With selective pinning (Figure 2b) only 2 regions were typically pinned and they
received about 45% of reference activity on average.
(a) Derby, Unselective Pinning
(b) Derby, Selective Pinning
Figure 3: Derby Activity
The derby benchmark produced a greater and more stable population of
tenured regions, with a large number (>500) persisting over the course of the
run. This is not surprising since derby loads an entire database into the heap
before the benchmarking iteration starts and retains these objects for the duration of the run. With unselective pinning (Figure 3a) the maximum number
Pmax of regions (256) were typically pinned at any time and they received about
69% of reference activity on average. With selective pinning (Figure 3b) only
5 - 6 regions were typically pinned and they received about 53% of reference
11
activity on average. If the Pmax limit had been removed for unselective pinning
the number of pinned region would have risen to include more of the regions
containing portions of the derby database content. This in turn would have reduced the number of unpinned regions available for compaction and tail filling,
forcing allocation of new regions to receive aging heap objects. Selective pinning
performed almost as well for derby with at most 6 pinned regions.
(a) xml.transform, Unselective Pinning (b) xml.transform, Selective Pinning
Figure 4: xml.transform Activity
The xml.transform benchmark used an average of about 290 tenured regions,
of which only about 40 persisted throughout the run. With unselective pinning
(Figure 4a) about 23 regions were pinned, on average, and they received about
38% of reference activity on average. With selective pinning (Figure 4b) only 6
regions were typically pinned and they received about 31% of reference activity
on average.
(a) xml.validate, Unselective Pinning
(b) xml.validate, Selective Pinning
Figure 5: xml.validate Activity
The xml.validation benchmark used about 200 tenured regions, with about
12
13 persisting for the duration of the run. With unselective pinning (Figure 5a)
only about 7 regions were pinned at any time, and they received about 72%
of reference activity on average. With selective pinning (Figure 5b) only 2
regions were typically pinned and they received about 78% of reference activity
on average.
4.4
Cold Object Collection
Cold objects are collected into the cold area when their containing pinned regions
pass a time (Tcold ) where no new references into the region are sampled. The
number and total size of cold objects collected into the cold area, and the
number of references into the cold area, are summarized in Table 4 for all runs
of each SPECjvm2008 [16] benchmark profiled. The statistics for cold references
include the total reference count and the number of distinct objects referenced.
For all benchmark runs unselective pinning produced the greatest collection of
cold objects, but it also tended to result in a higher count of references into
the cold area, especially for xml.transform. In all cases, the number of distinct
objects referenced was small, regardless of pinning strategy.
Table 4: The number and the size of cold objects
compiler.compiler
unselective, run1
unselective, run2
selective, run1
selective, run2
derby
unselective, run1
unselective, run2
selective, run1
selective, run2
xml.transform
unselective, run1
unselective, run2
selective, run1
selective, run2
xml.validation
unselective, run1
unselective, run2
selective, run1
selective, run2
Cold Objects
Cold Bytes
Cold References
24,452
15,717
0
0
4,498,952
8,009,752
0
0
3
0
0
0
79,383
40,861
9,039
3,284
6,868,440
10,958,816
1,379,888
279,736
0
1
0
0
27,603
29,995
14,486
12,961
16,749,392
17,394,688
8,928,248
5,734,144
716,850
635,768
0
0
16,188
14,926
3,698
4,889
2,910,520
2,733,280
474,904
582,880
0
0
0
16
2
1
3
2
3
Figures 6a- 6b show the cold collections for the first runs with unselective
13
and selective pinning for each benchmark. The left axes represent total byte
count; the right axes represent object count. Partial GC cycle counts at the
time of cold collection are represented on the horizontal axes.
(a) Compiler.compiler,
Pinning
Unselective (b) Compiler.compiler, Selective Pinning
Figure 6: Compiler.compiler, Cold objects
Unselective pinning for compiler.compiler resulted in a collection of over 30
pinned regions, six of which were cold collected. Three references to two cold
objects were subsequently sampled. Selective pinning resulted in two regions
that remained pinned for most of the compiler.compiler benchmark run. One
of these went cold (no new activity for > Tcold seconds) about halfway through
the run and remained cold until the end but was not collectible because it’s
remembered card set was in a persistent overflow state.
(a) Derby, Unselective Pinning
(b) Derby, Selective Pinning
Figure 7: Derby, Cold objects
Unselective pinning for derby resulted in a maximal collection of pinned
regions (256 regions) and 15 cold collections. No activity was recorded in the
cold area. Selective pinning pinned only six very active regions, two of which
were cold collected early in the run. There was no activity in the cold area.
Unselective pinning for xml.transform resulted in a collection of about 23
pinned regions, 19 of which were cold collected. However, there were a high
number of references to three objects in the cold area. Selective pinning pinned
at most six active regions at any time but eight regions were cold collected.
There was no subsequent activity in the cold area.
14
(a) xml.transform, Unselective Pinning (b) xml.transform, Selective Pinning
Figure 8: xml.transform, Cold objects
(a) xml.validate, Unselective Pinning
(b) xml.validate, Selective Pinning
Figure 9: xml.validate, Cold objects
Unselective pinning for xml.validation resulted in a collection of about seven
pinned regions, five of which were cold collected. There were no references to
objects in the cold area. Selective pinning pinned at most two active regions at
any time and cold collected one region. There was no subsequent activity in the
cold area.
5
Evaluation of the Stack-Based Solution with
an Access Barrier
Since stack sampling is intermittent, with each mutator thread walking its stack
about once per millisecond, and can only occur at safe points only, there is a
concern that the reference sampling rate may not be high enough to support
reliable cold object identification. An Access Barrier can capture all read/write
access operations when Java runs interpreting mode. Since the Access Barrier
does not miss any access information, it will be used as benchmark to evaluate
the correctness and efficiency of stack-based solution.
5.1
Evaluation Metrics
Two key metrics are used to evaluate stack-based solution. F alseInactivity is
used to verify the reliability of stack-based solution. ConvergenceT ime is used
15
to evaluate the efficiency of stack-based solution.
• F alseInactivity is the number of objects that are considered inactive with
the stack-based solution, but are marked active with the Access Barrier.
For example, because of non-continuous sampling, the stack-based solution
misses some objects’ activities, and these objects are considered to be
inactive. However, these objects’ activities are captured by the Access
Barrier. The F alseInactivity reflects the missing of some active objects.
Smaller values mean better stack-based solutions. The F alseInactivity is
a ratio described in the following formula.
F alseInactivity =
N umbers of f alse inactive objects
N umbers of all inactive objects
(3)
• ConvergenceT ime is the time span that a region is pinned before it is
determined to have identified all active objects. ConvergenceT ime reflects the speed that a pinned region is found to collect cold objects. The
lower the ConvergenceT ime is, the more efficient the identification of cold
objects is.
5.2
Experiments
Two evaluation experiments are performed with Java executing in interpreting
mode instead of Just-in-Time mode.
5.3
Case 1 - SPECjvm2008 Derby
Running parameters are as follows.
1. Running period: 60 hours
2. Cold threshold: 6 hours
3. Sampling interval: 100 ms
Benchmark Derby was run for 60 hours, active objects were identified with
stack-based and Access Barrier at the same time. Experimental results are
presented in Table 5. It is not surprising that the Access Barrier can harvest
more cold objects than the stack-based solution, because the Access Barrier can
capture all read/write access to objects, while stack sampling is intermittent.
For example, the number of collectible pinned regions in Access Barrier is 5
times larger than in stack-based solution; the number of cold objects in Access
Barrier is 11.78 times larger than that in stack-based solution; and the size of
cold objects is 10.42 times larger in Access Barrier than that in stack-based
solution.
16
Table 5: Evaluation with SPECjvm2008 Derby
Items
Collectible pinned regions
CovergenceTime(in Second)
All Objects
Active Objects
Cold Objects
Size of All Objects(in Byte)
Size of Active Objects(in Byte)
Size of Cold Objects(in Byte)
5.3.1
AccessBarrier
85
27,721.62
1,485,531
673,272
812,259
172,021,784
129,221,416
42,800,368
stack-based
17
69,497.71
72,290
3,350
68,940
32,882,056
28,773,560
4,108,496
Ratio
5: 1
1:2.50
11.78:1
10.42:1
Reliability of the stack-based solution.
The F alseInactivity ratio is 1.62% (see Table 4), which is quite low. It reflects
the fact that there are few objects that are incorrectly classified as cold. The
data supports the hypothesis that cold objects can be identified by the stackbased approach, which is encouraging.
Table 6: F alseInactivity Results
Inactive objects
68,940
5.3.2
F alseInactivity Objects
1,117
F alseInactivity Ratio
1.62%
Efficiency of the stack-based marking approach.
The Access Barrier has found 85 collectible pinned regions, while the stackbased solution has 17 collectible pinned regions. Although the Access Barrier
has more collectible pinned regions than the stack-based solution, 17 collectible
pinned regions in the stack-based solution are completely included in the Access
Barrier collectible pinned regions.
Figure 10 shows a convergence time comparison between stack-based solution and the Access Barrier. The X-axis represents 17 common collectible
pinned regions, the Y-axis represents convergence time. In the Access Barrier,
the maximum convergence time is less than 500 minutes, while in stack-based
solution, the maximum convergence time reaches more than 2500 minutes.
5.4
Case 2 - SPECjvm2008 Compiler.compiler
Running parameters are as follows.
1. Running period: 12 hours
17
Figure 10: Convergence time in Derby
2. Cold threshold: 72 minutes
3. Sampling interval: 15 ms
After Compiler.compiler has run by 12 hours, the results shown in Table
7 are obtained. The Access Barrier still harvests more cold objects than the
stack-based solution.
Table 7: Evaluation with Compiler.compiler
Items
Collectible pinned regions
AverageColdDuration (in Seconds)
All Objects
Active Objects
Cold Objects
Size of All Object (in Bytes)
Size of Active Object (in Bytes)
Size of Cold Object (in Bytes)
5.4.1
AccessBarrier
64
4440.64
1,390,739
141,772
1,248,967
3.32
20,090,576
109,475,216
stack-based
28
6311.96
376,824
279
376,545
53,923,840
1,280,616
52,643,224
Ratio
2.29 : 1
1 : 1.42
3.32 : 1
2.08 : 1
Reliability of stack-based solution.
The falseInactivity ratio is 0.32% (see Table 8), which is still quite low. The
data confirms that cold objects can be identified by the stack-based approach.
18
Table 8: F alseInactivity
Inactive objects
376,545
5.4.2
F alseInactivity Objects
1,191
falseInactivity Ratio
0.32%
Convergence time analysis.
The Access Barrier has 64 collectible pinned regions. The stack-based solution has 28 collectible pinned regions. Although the Access Barrier has more
collectible pinned regions than the stack-based solution, 28 collectible pinned
regions in the stack-based solution are completely included in the Barrier-based
collectible pinned regions.
Figure 11 shows a convergence time comparison between stack-based solution
and Access Barrier. In the Access Barrier, the maximum convergence time is
less than 100 minutes. While in stack-based solution, the convergence time in
the majority of collectible pinned regions is less than 100 minutes as well, only
3 collectible pinned regions have a high convergence time.
Figure 11: Convergence time in Compiler.compiler
6
DISCUSSION
During the ssd-stack JVM benchmarking runs, mutator threads walked their
stacks to harvest heap references once every 1-2 ms on average. For cold object
identification to be reliable and effective, the rate of reference sampling must be
such that any active object within a pinned region is likely to appear on a mutator stack at a stack walking safe point at least once while the region is pinned.
The F alseInactivity experimental results in Derby and Compiler.compiler show
19
that the sampling frequency with 1-2 ms can satisfy the requirement of cold object identification.
A very small number of cold objects were referenced during any of the ssdstack JVM runs, and with the exception of xml.transform cold objects were
referenced very infrequently. Most benchmark runs collected a few tens of thousands of cold objects. In the exceptional case of compiller.compiler with selective
pinning, one pinned region went cold after 1,757 partial GC cycles but was not
collectible due to a persistently overflowed remembered set; none of the 3,354
objects that were cold at that point received references for the remainder of the
benchmark run (for 8,055 subsequent partial GC cycles).
The ssd-stack JVM, with selective or unselective pinning, consistently resulted in increased memory pressure, timeslicing, and kernel CPU usage compared to the linux JVM. The singleton thread activity sampling daemon minimizes writes to pinned region activity maps but must test the activity bit for
every sampled reference into a pinned region, making activity maps high running
candidates for available cache lines. Although cache misses were not profiled for
these runs, it is likely that high frequency access to pinned region activity maps
from the thread activity sampling daemon had a significant effect on memory
bandwidth. Since the daemon thread is bound to a specific node this effect may
be limited, especially in larger multicore systems. However, the daemon does
present a multicore scalability problem since it must handle proportionately
larger loads as the number of available cores increases.
Most of the ssd-stack benchmarking runs yielded a few tens of megabytes in
the cold area and consumed 4-6% of the available CPU bandwidth, which is a
relatively high price to pay for the amount of cold data collected. In this paper,
only primitive arrays and leaf objects are considered as cold objects. If cold
objects are not limited to primitive arrays and leaf objects, the amount of cold
data collected should be increased, but the possibility of object references from
cold objects to active objects would then require that marking should traverse
into the cold area, which is undesirable.
The region pinning framework attempts to pin the most active regions because they highlight mutator activity and allow cold objects to be identified
more quickly and with greater confidence. Selective pinning sets a high bar on
the activity metric for selectable regions and tends to pin only a few regions,
without replacement. It tended to collect a relatively small but very stable set
of cold objects. Unselective pinning attempts to maximize the number of pinned
regions and selects the most active regions in batches, but tends to unpin and
replace these over time. This strategy produced more substantial cold collections and the cold area typically received a small amount of reference activity
that was confined to a small number of distinct objects.
7
CONCLUSION
In this paper, we show the stack-based cold object identification framework,
which samples the mutator thread stack, marks the active objects, and harvests
20
the cold objects. stack-based reference sampling was effective in identifying inactive objects for the SPECjvm2008 [16] benchmarks studied here, as evidenced
by the stability of the cold areas established during the benchmark runs. A few
tens of megabytes of cold objects have been identified and harvested into cold
regions. Furthermore, we evaluate the correctness and efficiency of stack-based
solution with an Access barrier implementation, the results support that the
stack-based solution is an acceptable cold object identification approach.
The runtime overhead for walking mutator stacks and maintaining pinned
activity maps offset any gains that accrued from establishing the cold area and
marshalling cold objects out of resident memory, but there is still space to reduce
overhead by optimization.
8
FUTURE WORK
The focus of this effort so far has been on cold object identification and sequestration. If further development is extended, a mechanism for managing
frequently active objects in the cold area should be developed. For example, if
madvise() [13] is used to sequester pages in the cold area, pages containing parts
of active objects can be excluded. This would be effective if these objects are
relatively rare and simpler than providing specialized methods to copy active
cold objects back into tenured regions.
Only limited amount of work has been done to verify that the JVM and GC
do not reference objects in the cold area. Some JIT and GC (concurrent mark)
activity in cold areas was detected by erecting a partial memory protection
(read/write) barrier around the cold area between GC cycles. A similar mechanism can be used to detect GC incursions into the cold area during GC cycles,
but this has not been investigated to date. The sources of these incursions will
need to be modified to suppress activity in the cold area. For example, objects
being marked in the root set, where the leaf marking optimization is not available, can be tested for inclusion in cold regions and treated as leaf objects in
that case. The JIT peeks into cold regions to determine the length of arrays but
it may be possible to apply defaults or forego optimizations for arrays located
within the cold area.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support provided by IBM
and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) through the Atlantic
Innovation Fund (AIF) program. Furthermore, we would also like to thank the
New Brunswick Innovation Fund for contributing to this project. Finally, we
would like to thank the Centre for Advanced Studies - Atlantic for access to the
resources for conducting our research.
21
References
[1] Balanced garbage collection policy. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/
knowledgecenter/SSYKE2_7.0.0/com.ibm.java.aix.70.doc/diag/
understanding/mm_gc_balanced.html. Accessed: 2015-05-12.
[2] IBM Garbage Collection policies. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/
knowledgecenter/SSYKE2_7.0.0/com.ibm.java.zos.71.doc/diag/
appendixes/cmdline/xgcpolicy.html?lang=en. Accessed date: 201505-12.
[3] J9 Virtual Machine (JVM).
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/
knowledgecenter/#!/SSYKE2_7.0.0/com.ibm.java.win.70.doc/user/
java_jvm.html. Accessed: 2015-05-12.
[4] JIT compiler overview.
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/
knowledgecenter/#!/SSYKE2_7.0.0/com.ibm.java.lnx.70.doc/diag/
understanding/jit_overview.html. Accessed: 2015-05-12.
[5] Diab Abuaiadh, Yoav Ossia, Erez Petrank, and Uri Silbershtein. An efficient parallel heap compaction algorithm. In OOPSLA, pages 224–236,
2004.
[6] Ali-Reza Adl-Tabatabai, MichalCierniak, Guei-Yuan Lueh, Vishesh M.
Parikh, and James M. Stichnoth. Fast, effective code generation in a justin-time java compiler. SIGPLAN Not., 33(5):280–290, May 1998.
[7] James Gosling, Bill Joy, Guy L. Steele, Jr., Gilad Bracha, and Alex Buckley. The Java Language Specification, Java SE 7 Edition. Addison-Wesley
Professional, 1st edition, 2013.
[8] Richard E. Jones and Andy C. King. A fast analysis for thread-local
garbage collection with dynamic class loading. In 5th IEEE International
Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM), pages 129–
138, Budapest, September 2005.
[9] Toshiaki Kurokawa. A new fast and safe marking algorithm. Lisp Bull.,
(3):9–35, December 1979.
[10] Tim Lindholm and Frank Yellin. Java Virtual Machine Specification.
Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1999.
[11] Robert Love. Linux System Programming: Talking Directly to the Kernel
and C Library. O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2007.
[12] Jeremy Manson, William Pugh, and Sarita V. Adve. The java memory
model. SIGPLAN Not., 40(1):378–391, January 2005.
[13] Marshall Kirk Mckusick and Michael J. Karels. A new virtual memory
implementation for Berkeley UNIX. In EUUG Conference Proceedings,
pages 451–458, 1986.
22
[14] Pekka P. Pirinen. Barrier techniques for incremental tracing. SIGPLAN
Not., 34(3):20–25, October 1998.
[15] Ryan Sciampacone, Peter Burka, and Aleksandar Micic. Garbage collection
in websphere application server v8, part 2: Balanced garbage collection as
a new option. In IBM WebSphere Developer Technical Journal., 2011.
[16] Kumar Shiv, Kingsum Chow, Yanping Wang, and Dmitry Petrochenko.
Specjvm2008 performance characterization. In Proceedings of the 2009
SPEC Benchmark Workshop on Computer Performance Evaluation and
Benchmarking, pages 17–35, 2009.
[17] Kumar Shiv, Kingsum Chow, Yanping Wang, and Dmitry Petrochenko.
Specjvm2008 performance characterization. In Proceedings of the 2009
SPEC Benchmark Workshop on Computer Performance Evaluation and
Benchmarking, pages 17–35, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag.
[18] David Ungar. Generation scavenging: A non-disruptive high performance
storage reclamation algorithm. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 9(3):157–167,
April 1984.
23
| 6cs.PL
|
Enhancing human color vision by breaking binocular redundancy
Bradley S. Gundlach1, Michel Frising1,2, Alireza Shahsafi1, Gregory Vershbow3, Chenghao Wan1,4,
Jad Salman1, Bas Rokers5,6, Laurent Lessard1, Mikhail A. Kats1,4,6*
1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
2
Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3
Department of Art, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
4
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
5
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
6
McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
To see color, the human visual system combines the response of three types of cone cells in the
retina – a compressive process that discards a significant amount of spectral information.
Here, we present an approach to enhance human color vision by breaking its inherent
binocular redundancy, providing different spectral content to each eye. We fabricated and
tested a set of optical filters that “splits” the response of the short-wavelength cone between
the two eyes in individuals with typical trichromatic vision, simulating the presence of
approximately four distinct cone types (“tetrachromacy”). Such an increase in the number of
simulated cone types can reduce the prevalence of metamers – pairs of distinct spectra that
resolve to the same perceived color. This technique may result in an enhancement of spectral
perception, with applications ranging from camouflage detection and anti-counterfeiting to
new types of artwork and data visualization.
In the typical human eye, the three cone types – labeled “S” for short wavelengths, “M” for
medium, and “L” for long – are primarily sensitive to light with wavelengths in the 390 - 530 nm, 400 670 nm, and 400 - 700 nm bands, respectively [1–4]. When excited by light, a signal from the cones is
relayed though retinal ganglion cells, to the optic nerve, and then the brain, where it is further processed to
produce a color sensation [5, 6]. This process can be understood as a type of lossy compression from an N-
1
dimensional spectrum, where N is the number of wavelength bins necessary to sufficiently approximate a
continuous spectrum, into a color, which is a three-dimensional object (Fig. 1). A manifestation of this Nto-three compression is metamerism, a phenomenon in which different spectra appear as the same color.
The number of cone types and the widths and separations of their spectral sensitivities govern the degree to
which metamerism is a limitation of the visual system; for example, a hypothetical increase in the number
of distinct cone types should result in a decrease in the prevalence of metamers. Cast in a signal processing
perspective, an increase in the sampling rate of a spectrum (i.e., the number of cones) improves the ability
to detect sharp features in the spectrum, even for non-uniform sampling [7, 8].
Figure 1: (a) A sample spectrum generated by a cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor displaying a purple
color. The filled rectangle represents a single spectral bin, if the continuous spectrum is divided into N
bins. (b) (i) Normalized spectral sensitivity of the cone types for a typical trichromatic observer ( = 3).
(ii) Normalized spectral sensitivity of the effective cone types for a typical trichromatic observer
enhanced using our device ( =
4). (c) A representation of the perceived color of the spectrum in (a).
The case with =
4 cannot be displayed, but extra spectral information would be present compared to
the = 3 case.
Several studies have reported that a small percentage of humans, primarily women, express a
mutated L cone in addition to the standard one, resulting in a total of four cone types, which may enable
2
vision with four color dimensions (tetrachromacy) [9-11]. Reports suggest that a few of these individuals
can utilize this fourth photopigment type, and thus “perceive significantly more chromatic appearances”
compared to typical, healthy humans with three cone types (trichromats) [12, 13]. More broadly, it is
reasonable to infer that an additional cone type would enhance spectral perception, provided subsequent
neural processing can capitalize on its presence.
Figure 2: (a) Simplified schematic of an optical filter comprising several thin-film layers. (b) Measured
transmission spectra of fabricated Filters 1 (black) and 2 (blue). (c) Magnified portion of the
transmission spectrum from (b), including angle dependence with angle of incidence (AOI) from 0 to
15°. (d) Colors of an example metameric pair (1, 2) and D65 broadband white light (3), as perceived by
a typical trichromat. The traces in each box are the underlying unfiltered spectra (arbitrary units),
taken from our experiments, as described in Fig. 3. (e, f) Rendered monocular colors of the spectra in
(d) after passing through Filter 1 and Filter 2, respectively. Note that e(1) and e(2), f(1) and f(2) are
substantially distinct, while e(3) and f(3) are similar in color due to the white-balance constraint
enforced in our design.
3
Here, we aim to simulate tetrachromatic (and possibly higher-dimensional) color vision in typical
trichromatic humans by increasing the number of effective (simulated) cone types in the visual system
comprising the two eyes and a passive optical device. This approach breaks the binocular redundancy of
the two eyes, where the visual fields of each eye are overlapping, providing different spectral content to
each eye via a wearable passive multispectral device comprising two optical transmission filters (Fig. 2).
A number of existing vision-assistive devices or techniques operate by breaking binocular
redundancy, though usually in the spatial rather than spectral domain. Examples include hemianopia
(partial blindness in the left or right visual field) treatment using spectacles with a monocular sector prism
that selectively relocates the visual field in one eye, leaving the other eye unaffected, and thus conferring
an additional 20° of visual-field sensitivity for binocular vision [14, 15], and the treatment of presbyopia by
correcting one eye for near vision and the other for distance vision [16].
The binocular redundancy can be broken spectrally by using filters that selectively attenuate
different wavelength bands to yield effective cone sensitivities (i.e., the products of the cone sensitivities
and the filter transmission spectra) that are different between the two eyes. This increases the number of
effective cone types while preserving most spatial information. In this vein, the use of two simple bandpass filters was previously demonstrated to increase the dimensionality of color vision in dichromatic
individuals (i.e., those with two functioning cone types) [17]. Conversely, the goal here is to enhance the
dimensionality of a trichromat’s visual system to beyond that of a typical human. Such an approach was
briefly suggested by Cornsweet in 1970 [18], but to our knowledge no specific design has been proposed
or realized. We note that the use of even a single filter positioned in front of both eyes can help distinguish
certain metamers [18], with the caveat that previously distinguishable spectra can become metamers when
viewed through the filter; that is, a similar number of metamers are created as are destroyed. In contrast, the
4
use of two filters might be used to decrease the overall number of possible metamers; if at least one of the
two filters can be used to differentiate a pair of spectra, we consider the pair to no longer be metamers.
To design the set of filters, we used a standard psychophysical model to determine the perceived
(monocular) colors corresponding to particular spectra [2, 19]. Here, colors are calculated using the
International Commission on Illumination (CIE) 1931 standard observer matching functions. CIE LAB is
our preferred color space, as it is more perceptually uniform than other color spaces; the coordinates in
LAB space ([L, a, b]) correspond to the luminance (L) and hue (a & b) [20]. We calculate differences in
monocular colors (e.g., between color 1 and color 2) in the LAB space using (see the supplementary
information for further details) [2]:
∆E12 = ( L2 − L1 ) 2 + (a2 − a1 ) 2 + (b2 − b1 ) 2
(1)
The filters are designed to enhance the ability of a typical trichromatic viewer to discriminate
spectra while limiting adverse effects such as color clashing. For simplicity, we focused on a design that
splits the response of the S cone, thus transforming the trichromatic visual system into one that emulates
tetrachromatic vision.
The responsivity of the S cone has relatively little overlap with those of the M and L cones (Fig.
1b(i)), so it can be attenuated while minimizing the impact on the effective responsivity of other two cone
types. To provide parity between eyes, we partitioned the S cone responsivity such that each eye retains
approximately half of the original response spectrum (Fig. 1b(ii)). We also imposed a “white-balance”
constraint, ensuring that the transmission of broadband white light (defined using CIE illuminant D65 [21])
through the two filters results in a similar color. This constraint was put in place to minimize potential color
clashing between the eyes when the device is used in daylight [22].
The detailed filter design process is presented in the supplementary information, briefly
summarized here. The final device comprises a 450 nm long-pass filter (Filter 1) and a 450-500 nm, 6305
680 nm double-band-stop filter (Filter 2) (Fig. 2b-c). The 450 nm transition between Filters 1 and 2 is at
the peak sensitivity of the S cone, and partitions it in half. However, due to the non-zero sensitivity of the
M and L cones in the 450-500 nm region (Fig. 1b(i)), the M and L cones are also (unintentionally)
attenuated by Filter 2. The 630-680 nm stopband was introduced to attenuate the effective responsivity of
the M and L cones to broadband white light to preserve color balance. This double-band-pass filter was
optimized by varying the stopband/passband positions and transmittances using simulated annealing
methods to minimize the CIE ΔE color difference of D65 white light passing through Filters 1 and 2. Note
that the design presented here is a proof of concept, and is not a unique or globally optimal solution.
The optimized transmission function of Filter 2 was implemented using conventional thin-film
technology [23], with alternating layers of silicon oxide (SiO2 , n = 1.46) and tantalum oxide (Ta2O5, n =
2.15) (Fig. 2a-b)). The required film thicknesses were determined by conventional thin-film optimization
methods, including gradual evolution [24] and needle optimization [25] (see the supplementary information
for further details), to implement the target transmission function. The final stack was constrained to be less
than 75 total layers, and each layer between 10 and 500 nm thick. The filter was optimized such that the
transmission would not change significantly for incident angles up to 5° away from the normal. The films
were deposited using ion-assisted sputtering onto an NBK7 glass substrate at a thin-film foundry (Iridian).
To reduce cost, Filter 1 was approximated by an off-the-shelf component (450LP RapidEdge, Omega
Optical). The two filters were then characterized by angle-dependent transmission spectroscopy,
demonstrating that the transmission spectra are robust to incidence angles up to 5° away from the normal
(Fig. 2c). Following fabrication, the filters were constructed into a pair of glasses.
6
Figure 3: (a) Schematic of our metamer generation setup. Images from two monitors, an LCD and
a CRT display, are combined using a 50/50 beam splitter (i), to be viewed at location (ii). The two
monitors use different emission mechanisms, and thus generate different spectra for the same
color. (b) Photograph taken at position (ii) in the schematic. (c) Measured emission spectra from
the LCD (solid) and CRT (dashed) monitors while displaying the same purple color. Spectra are
shown with arbitrary units. (d) Rendered colors of the spectra in (c) viewed through no filter, Filter
1, and Filter 2, respectively, showing that the metamers can be distinguished using either filter.
See the supplementary information for discussion of the difference between rendered colors in (d)
and those in the photograph in (b).
To test the performance of this design, we constructed a setup that generates metameric spectra
using a liquid crystal display (LCD, True HD-IPS display on LG G3 smartphone) and a cathode ray tube
(CRT, Dell E770P) monitor (Fig. 3a-b). The displays use different emission mechanisms, and thus produce
distinct spectra when displaying the same color [26, 27]. In our experiment, pairs of metamers were
presented side by side using a 50/50 beam splitter (Edmund Optics), allowing color comparisons to be
made. The colors of each monitor were individually adjusted until no perceivable color difference was
present. The spectra of light generated by the monitors with and without filters were acquired using a freespace spectrometer (Ocean Optics FLAME VIS-NIR with cosine corrector), and color difference
calculations were performed to ensure the colors were indistinguishable given a standard observer. A
7
threshold value of 2.3 for the CIE ΔE “just noticeable difference” was used to define which spectra were
indistinguishable (i.e., ΔE < 2.3) [28]. One representative example using a pair of metamers that appear
purple is shown in Fig. 3b-d. Without the use of either filter, the two different spectra appeared as nearly
identical patches of color. However, when observed through either of the filters, the two can be easily
differentiated. Subjectively, we observed that, by looking at a particular patch through both filters
simultaneously (i.e., Filter 1 over the left eye, Filter 2 over the right), a “meta-color” can be observed, which
appears to be different from the color perceived through either filter individually or with no filter. This
meta-color may be a manifestation of the approximately four effective cone types created by the pair of
filters. We note that a related study involving dichromats demonstrated an increase in color dimensionality
using band-pass filters, though the authors suggest the effect could be related to binocular lustre [17], which
may also be responsible for the effect we observed. We emphasize that our experiment does not probe to
what degree the neuronal processing system of a trichromat can take advantage of this extra information.
Broadly stated, the number of cone types and their frequency-dependent responsivities determines
the extent to which metamerism is a limitation to the visual system. Our method increases the number of
effective/simulated cone types, which decreases the number of potential metamers, provided the
subsequent neuronal processing can adapt appropriately (which seems to occur in the case of spatial
multiplexing used for vision-assistive devices [14, 15]). In general, quantitatively determining the decrease
in the metamer frequency is difficult because the set of possible metamers is not bounded. Nevertheless,
various metrics can be applied to roughly estimate this quantity.
As described in detail in the supplementary information, we estimated the ratio of metamer
frequency reduction by linearizing the mapping between a discretized spectrum and the LAB space.
Counting the number of metamers for a particular LAB reference point [Lo, ao, bo] amounts to counting the
number of different spectra ( ) that map to tristimulus values that are within a sphere in LAB space of
8
radius Δ = 2.3 of the reference point. We discretized spectra using N samples to avoid working in
infinite-dimensional space (Fig. 1a), bounding the set of possible spectra by considering D65 light reflected
from (or transmitted through) an arbitrary object. Using the linearized mapping, the set of metamers in Ndimensional spectrum space is a high-dimensional ellipsoid. The volume of the ellipsoid describes the
number of possible metamers for the unfiltered case. To estimate the number of metamers using the twofilter device presented here, the approximate volume of overlapping ellipsoids (corresponding to the two
separately filtered spectra) bounded by box constraints (corresponding to the D65 illuminant, as discussed
above) was used [29]. The ratio of metamer reduction for a given LAB reference point was calculated by
the ratio of the volumes of metameric spectra between the unfiltered and filtered cases. To roughly sample
the space of possible colors, we repeated the computation for 500 different reference points [Lo, ao, bo],
selected by choosing discretized spectra uniformly at random and mapping them to LAB tristimulus values.
Using this metric, we estimate a decrease in metamer frequency by one-to-two orders of magnitude when
using our passive multispectral device (see Table 1 in the supplementary information). By the same metric,
a single-filter system designed to improve vision in color-vision-deficient individuals [30] seems to provide
no decrease in the frequency of apparent metamers.
By breaking the inherent chromatic redundancy in binocular vision, our method provides the user
with more spectral information than he/she would otherwise receive. In the present design, the S cone is
partitioned using a pair of filters that results in photoreceptor responses consistent with a visual system that
utilizes approximately four cone types (tetrachromacy). Although the current demonstration splits the S
cone, which is more selectively sensitive to blue-colored objects, it is possible to use similar methods to
design filters that more-strongly affect metamers that appears as green and red, that are more prevalent in
nature [31]. While the possibility of natural tetrachromacy in a fraction of the population has received both
academic and popular interest [11–13], the technology demonstrated here has the potential to provide
9
tetrachromatic vision to anyone with typical, healthy trichromatic vision. The extent to which observes can
(or can learn) to take advantage of the additional spectral information is yet to be determined.
Given two eyes and three types of cones, it should be possible to increase the number of effective
cones up to six using our approach, and potentially even more with spatial or temporal multiplexing. It may
also be possible to generate personalized designs to improve color discrimination for individuals with colorvision deficiencies. This technology can be integrated in a simple pair of eyeglasses or sunglasses, and
could have immediate applications in camouflage detection, quality control, and anti-counterfeiting. More
broadly, the ability to see many more colors has intriguing opportunities for design and artwork, and for
data representation with extra color channels.
Funding. B. Gundlach is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research
Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1256259. This work was supported by startup funds from UW Madison.
Acknowledgment. We thank Middleton Spectral Vision for access to their hyperspectral imaging
systems.
10
REFERENCES
1. J. L. Schnapf, T. W. Kraft, and D. A. Baylor, "Spectral sensitivity of human cone
photoreceptors," Nature 325, 439–441 (1987).
2. G. Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and
Formulae, 2 edition (Wiley-Interscience, 2000).
3. A. Stockman and L. T. Sharpe, "The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelengthsensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype," Vision Res. 40,
1711–1737 (2000).
4. J. D. Mollon, "Color vision: Opsins and options," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 4743–4745
(1999).
5. W. Backhaus, R. Kliegl, and J. S. Werner, Color Vision: Perspectives from Different
Disciplines (Walter de Gruyter, 1998).
6. L. Hurvich and D. Jameson, "An Opponent-Process Theory of Color Vision," Psychol. Rev.
64, 384–404 (1957).
7. H. B. Barlow, "What causes trichromacy? A theoretical analysis using comb-filtered spectra,"
Vision Res. 22, 635–643 (1982).
8. F. Marvasti, Nonuniform Sampling - Theory and Practice (Springer, 2001).
9. J. Neitz, M. Neitz, and G. H. Jacobs, "More than three different cone pigments among people
with normal color vision," Vision Res. 33, 117–122 (1993).
10. J. Neitz and G. H. Jacobs, "Polymorphism in normal human color vision and its mechanism,"
Vision Res. 30, 621–636 (1990).
11. A. L. Nagy, D. I. A. MacLeod, N. E. Heyneman, and A. Eisner, "Four cone pigments in
women heterozygous for color deficiency," JOSA 71, 719–722 (1981).
12. K. A. Jameson, S. M. Highnote, and L. M. Wasserman, "Richer color experience in observers
with multiple photopigment opsin genes," Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 244–261 (2001).
13. G. Jordan and J. D. Mollon, "A study of women heterozygous for colour deficiencies,"
Vision Res. 33, 1495–1508 (1993).
14. E. Peli, "Vision Multiplexing: an Engineering Approach to Vision Rehabilitation," Optom.
Vis. Sci. 78, 304–315 (2001).
15. E. Peli, "Treating with Spectacle Lenses: A Novel Idea!?," Optom. Vis. Sci. 79, 569–580
(2002).
16. D. Chernyak, "Binocular optical treatment for presbyopia," U.S. patent US20050261752 A1
(November 24, 2005).
17. K. Knoblauch and M. J. McMahon, "Discrimination of binocular color mixtures in
dichromacy: evaluation of the Maxwell-Cornsweet conjecture," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image
Sci. Vis. 12, 2219–2229 (1995).
18. T. N. Cornsweet, Visual Perception (Academic Press, 1970).
19. Colorimetry -- Part 1: CIE Standard Colorimetric Observers (2007).
20. Colorimetry -- Part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* Colour Space (2008).
21. Colorimetry -- Part 2: CIE Standard Illuminants (2007).
22. D. J. Polzella and D. A. Montgomery, "Dimensions of color harmony," Bull. Psychon. Soc.
31, 423–425 (1993).
23. A. MacLeod, Thin-Film Optical Filters, Fourth Edition (2010).
11
24. A. V. Tikhonravov, M.K. Trubetskov, T. V. Amotchkina, M. A. Kokarev, Proc. SPIE. 5250,
Advances in Optical Thin Films 312 (2004).
25. A. V. Tikhonravov, M. K. Trubetskov, and G. W. DeBell, "Optical coating design approaches based
on the needle optimization technique," Appl. Opt. 46, 704-710 (2007).
26. R. S. Berns, R. J. Motta, and M. E. Gorzynski, "CRT colorimetry. part I: Theory and
practice," Color Res. Appl. 18, 299–314 (1993).
27. G. Sharma, "LCDs versus CRTs-color-calibration and gamut considerations," Proc. IEEE 90,
605–622 (2002).
28. G. Sharma and R. Bala, Digital Color Imaging Handbook (CRC Press, 2002).
29. E. K. Yang and J. W. Tolle, "A class of methods for solving large, convex quadratic
programs subject to box constraints," Math. Program. 51, 223–228 (1991).
30. A. W. Schmeder and D. M. McPherson, "Multi-band color vision filters and method by lpoptimization," U.S. patent US20140233105 A1 (August 21, 2014).
31. M. E. Bulina, K. A. Lukyanov, I. V. Yampolsky, D. M. Chudakov, D. B. Staroverov, A. S.
Shcheglov, N. G. Gurskaya, and S. Lukyanov, "New class of blue animal pigments based on
Frizzled and Kringle protein domains," J. Biol. Chem. 279, 43367–43370 (2004).
12
Supplementary Information
Enhancing human color vision by breaking binocular redundancy
Bradley S. Gundlach1, Alireza Shahsafi1, Michel Frising1,2, Gregory Vershbow3, Chenghao Wan1,4,
Jad Salman1, Bas Rokers5,6, Laurent Lessard1, Mikhail A. Kats1,4,6*
1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
2
Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3
Department of Art, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
4
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
5
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
6
McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Narrative explanation of the filter design process
The filters in this work were designed using a white-balance condition that ensures that broadband
“white light” that passes through the two filters is perceived similarly, to prevent significant color clashing
between the two eyes under typical viewing conditions. Simultaneously, the filters are designed to be
sufficiently distinct, which results in each eye receiving different spectral information. We used a design
approach where each revision increased in complexity, building intuition at each design stage.
For the first revision, a brick-wall longpass filter and a band-stop filter were used to split the blue
cone response without significantly affecting the other cone types (Fig. S1). The filters were constrained
such that the longpass filter cut-on wavelength was equal to the band-stop filter cut-off wavelength, which
ensured that at least one eye was sensitive to every region of the visible wavelengths (i.e., no wavelength
was attenuated by both filters). The band-stop filter cut-on wavelength was chosen to be 450 nm to minimize
the effect of the filters on the M and L cone responses; thus, we were left to decide the longpass cut-on and
band-stop cut-off wavelengths (which are enforced to be equal), and which must be below 450nm. With
these constraints, the position of the cut-on/cut-off wavelength was optimized in order to minimize the CIE
Δ
color difference between D65 white light passing through each filter. Figure S1(a) shows the result of
this optimization, with a minimum Δ color difference of 0.596 with the cut-on/cut-off wavelength at 437
nm. A Δ color difference less than 2.3 typically means that the colors are indistinguishable. The resulting
optimized filters are: a longpass filter (Filter 1) with a 437 nm transition wavelength, and a band-stop filter
(Filter 2) with a stopband of 437 - 450 nm. Figure S1(c) shows the rendered color of D65 white light through
13
each filter, and demonstrates the excellent white-balance between filters, because the color samples are
indistinguishable. However, the band-stop width of the resulting Filter 2 is only 13 nm, quite low in
comparison to the ~300 nm range of the visible wavelengths. In order to effectively differentiate spectral
features, which are typically quite broad (>10 - 20 nm), the band-stop width must be larger.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Filter 1
ΔE = 0.596
Filter 2
Figure S1: (a) Plot showing the CIE ΔE color difference between filters 1 and 2 when transmitting CIE D65 white
light versus cut-on/cut-off wavelength. (b) Optimized transmission response for filters 1 and 2 after the first
design revision, with a band-stop region between 437 – 450 nm. (c) Rendered colors for CIE D65 white light
transmitted through each filter from (b), with an optimized ΔE color difference of 0.596.
Because this initial design produced a filter set with good white-balance, the same general approach
was used in the following design revision. A similar optimization was performed as above, but the bandstop
width of Filter 2 was constrained to be larger than 25 nm; this width was chosen such that it was larger than
many typical spectral features found in nature, which could therefore be resolved with these filters. Instead
of minimizing just the Δ color difference between the filters, a modified merit function (MF) was used
that also accounted for the filter width: = Δ ⁄ . A brute-force optimization was
performed, which varied the cut-on and cut-off wavelengths of the two filters (again with the longpass cuton and bandstop cut-off wavelengths being equal). The transmission spectra of the optimized filters are
given in Figure S2: a longpass filter (Filter 1) with a 450 nm cut-on wavelength, and a bandstop filter (Filter
2) with a stopband of 450 – 500 nm. The resulting filter set has a Δ color difference of 14.15, significantly
above the 2.3 just noticeable difference threshold. Therefore, it is clear that for the simple design using a
longpass and single-bandstop filter, there is a tradeoff between white-balance and width of the band stop
region.
14
(b)
(a)
Filter 1
ΔE = 14.15
Filter 2
Figure S2: (a) Optimized transmission response for filters 1 and 2 after the second design revision, with a bandstop region of 450 - 500 nm. (b) Rendered colors for CIE D65 white light transmitted through each filter from
(b), with an optimized ΔE color difference of 14.15
By considering the cone responses (Figure 1(b)), it is clear why this filter design results in worse
white balance. Beyond 450 nm, the longpass filter allows all wavelengths of visible light through; the M
and L cones have very little response below 450 nm. However, the band-stop filter attenuates wavelengths
between 450 and 500 nm, where the M and L cones have significant sensitivity. Therefore, the two filters
affect the M and L cones very differently, which results in poor color balance. In particular, the band-stop
filter (Filter 2) introduces a slight red tint compared to the longpass filter (Filter 1), which is also clear from
the rendered colors in figure S2. Therefore, in order to maintain the high band-stop width of Filter 2 while
improving the white balance of the filter pair, a second stopband was introduced to Filter 2 in order to soften
the “red response” of the previous design. In this design, the shorter wavelength band-stop region of Filter
2 splits the S cone, whereas the longer wavelength band-stop region improves the white balance of the filter
pair.
In the final design revision that was implemented and described in the main text, the response of
the longpass filter (Filter 1) was not optimized any further; in fact, the transmission response of a
commercially available 450 nm longpass filter was used to define Filter 1. This was done to decrease
manufacturing costs, such that only Filter 2 required custom design and manufacturing. The shortwavelength band-stop region of the Filter 2 was also used from before (allowed to change only slightly
during optimization), and a preliminary long wavelength band-stop region was added between 600 and 700
nm, to be optimized further. An error function was also implemented to smooth the transition regions; in
15
the previous design revisions, the transition regions had a sharp vertical slope, which is difficult to achieve
in practice. The smoothness of the filters can be adjusted by changing the proportionality constant (a) of
the error function: erf"#.
Unlike the previous revisions, Filter 2 was optimized using a more rigorous method compared to
the brute force method used above. A constrained optimization by linear approximation (COBYLA) method
was implemented in a stochastic basin-hopping algorithm to optimize the position of the cut-on/cut-off
wavelengths, transmission of the pass and stop-bands, and slope of the transition regions. The transition
regions of the filter’s short-wavelength band-stop region was constrained within +/- 10 nm of their previous
values; this was done to maintain the overall shape of the previous design while allowing some room for
color balance optimization. The transmittance was constrained between 5 and 15% in the stopbands, and
between 80 and 95% in the passbands, to allow for high throughput and relative ease of manufacturing. The
error function proportionality constant was constrained between 0.25 and 1. The long-wavelength stopband
region was constrained between 600 – 700 nm, but the band-stop width was not constrained; this was done
to prevent attenuation of the M and L cones at their peak sensitivities (~550nm, ~580 nm respectively),
while also preventing needless optimization beyond the visible wavelengths (> 700 nm). With these
constraints in place, Filter 2 was optimized in order to minimize the modified merit function:
Δ ⁄ , where Δ
is the color difference between Filter 1 and Filter 2 when transmitting D65
white light and Widthbandstop is the spectral width of the short-wavelength band-stop region of Filter 2. This
procedure yielded an optimized response for Filter 2 with stopbands at 450 - 500 nm and 630 - 680 nm, and
(a)
(b)
Filter 1
ΔE = 5.21
(i)
Filter 2
(ii)
(ii)
Figure S3: (a) Optimized transmission response for filters 1 and 2 after the third design revision, with band-stop
regions between 450 – 500 nm (i) and 630 – 680 nm (ii). Region (i) splits the short-wavelength cone, region (ii)
improves the white-balance of the filter pair (b) Rendered colors for CIE D65 white light transmitted through
each filter from (a), with a ΔE color difference of 5.21.
16
stopband/passband transmittance of 10% and 90%, respectively (Figure S3(a)). The rendered color of
transmitted D65 white light through the filters is given in Figure S3(b), with a Δ color difference of 5.21.
Methodology for counting metamers:
In this section, we describe the technique by which we estimated the reduction of the occurrence
of metamerism using our vision enhancement device.
Each spectrum is mapped to LAB tristimulus values [%, ", '] via the CIE matching functions
described earlier in the supplementary. Counting the number of metamers for a particular LAB reference
point [%) , ") , ') ] amounts to counting the number of different spectra that map to tristimulus values
that are within a sphere in LAB space of radius ΔE of the reference point. The number of metameric spectra
is infinite, so we instead compute a surrogate quantity. Roughly, we discretize each spectrum by wavelength
so each spectrum can be abstracted as a point in a finite-dimensional space. We then count metamers by
computing the volume that they occupy in this space. The details of the computation are described below.
1. Represent spectra by using equally spaced samples in wavelength. For example, is
represented as a vector [+ , , , … , . ], which corresponds to the intensities at the wavelengths
[ +,
, , … , . ].
2. The map [+ , … , . ] → [%, ", '] from the discretized spectrum to LAB tristimulus values is smooth
and nonlinear. Since the map is only being evaluated in a local neighborhood of the reference point,
the map is well approximated by its first order Taylor expansion. This allows us to replace the
nonlinear map with an affine function 0+ , … , . [%, ", '].
3. Let 1) 2 [%, ", '] | (% − %) ), + (" − ") ), + (' − ') ), ≤ Δ
,
7 be the set of tristimulus values
indistinguishable from the reference point. The set of metameric spectra is given by the image of
1) under the inverse map 08+ .
4. Since the inverse map 08+ is affine and the set 1) is a sphere in LAB space, the image 08+ (1) ) is
an ellipsoid in the discretized spectrum space [S1]. Note that this ellipsoid is degenerate; it will be
infinite in the directions corresponding to the kernel of 0.
5. We assume that we are counting “reflection metamers” or “transmission metamers” under a certain
illuminant. That is, we are excluding metamers generated by active emissive sources for the sake
of this calculation, since including unbounded emissive sources complicates this calculation
further. Under this assumption, the allowed intensities are not infinite, since every admissible
spectrum has intensities bounded by the corresponding intensities of the illuminant. More formally,
17
define the set of admissible spectra as 9) = : [+ , … , . ] ; 0 ≤ = ≤ =>?@ for B = 1, … , D, where
=>?@ is the intensity at
=
of the D65 illuminant.
6. The volume of metameric spectra is therefore the volume of the set 08+ (1) ) ∩ 9).
If the spectrum is filtered through a filter F( ), the map 0 must be replaced by a map 0G that accounts for
the filter F. The derivation is otherwise identical; metameric spectra are given by the set 0G8+ (1) ) ∩ 9). If
the spectrum is filtered through F+ ( ) for one eye and F, ( ) for the other eye, spectra are only counted if
(1) ) ∩ 0G8+
(1) ) ∩ 9) .
they are metameric for both eyes. This results in the set 0G8+
H
I
We can compare configurations (e.g. natural human vision versus vision augmented by our device,
or vision augmented by two different filters sets) by comparing the volumes of their respective metameric
spectra. For example, to compare the unfiltered case (natural human vision) to the case of vision modified
by our two-filter passive multispectral device, we would compute the ratio:
J=
Vol(08+ (1) ) ∩ 9) )
(1) ) ∩ 0G8+
(1) ) ∩ 9) N
VolM0G8+
H
I
A ratio of J = 20 would signify that metameric spectra are 20 times less abundant when the two-filter
passive multispectral device is used as compared to the unfiltered case. Specifically, if spectra are sampled
from a uniform distribution on intensities, a spectrum is 20 times less likely to be metameric.
Computing the ratio J is challenging because the volumes involved have irregular shapes; they are
intersections of degenerate (high-dimensional) ellipsoids with box constraints. In order to approximate the
ratio J, we approximate each volume by the volume of its max-volume inscribed ellipsoid. An illustration
of a max-volume inscribed ellipsoid is shown below (Fig. S4).
Figure S4: The shaded region is the intersection of ellipsoids
and box constraints. The area is approximated by the max-area
inscribed ellipsoid (dotted curve).
18
It turns out the max-volume inscribed ellipsoid can be efficiently computed using semidefinite
programming techniques. See for example [S2]. We approximated the ratio J by using the inner ellipsoid
approximation for both the numerator and denominator. Volume approximation ratios were computed using
CVX, a package for specifying and solving convex programs [S3]. We computed approximate volume
ratios for the two-filter case as well as the one-filter case, using the transmission spectrum of a filter sold
by EnChroma for alleviating some of the adverse effects of red-green color vision deficiency (EnChroma
filter [S4]). In each case, we tried several different discretization samples and we repeated the
computation for 500 different reference points [%) , ") , ') ]. The reference points were selected by choosing
discretized spectra uniformly at random and mapping them to LAB tristimulus values. A summary of the
results is shown in Table S1. Using two filters results in a dramatic decrease in metamers, roughly consistent
over the range of tested discretizations. In contrast, using a single filter (EnChroma in this case) has little
effect on the number of metamers.
Discretization samples ()
7
9
12
14
16
18
Two filters, mean
22.977
115.823
120.580
160.634
178.020
111.243
Two filters, median
17.251
80.690
57.4080
85.885
77.153
41.369
EnChroma, mean
0.945
0.887
1.090
0.944
1.125
1.086
EnChroma, median
0.945
0.870
1.082
0.944
0.924
1.017
Table S1 – Results of the metamer ratio approximation. Mean and median J values are computed over
500 randomly generated spectra for each discretization. Using two filters reduces the frequency of
metamers by a factor of about 50 on average, while using a single EnChroma filter has a negligible effect
on the frequency of metamers
Thin-film filter design
The filter response design goal (Fig. S3(a)) used in this work is realized by conventional thin-film
design methods. A commercial thin-film design software (Optilayer) was used to optimize a two-material
thin-film stack to adequately meet the design goal. Tantalum oxide (Ta2O5) was chosen as the high index
(n = 2.15) material and silicon dioxide (SiO2) was chosen as the low index (n = 1.46) material, as they are
both easily deposited. The substrate was NBK7, a common optical glass. The final stack was constrained
19
to be less than 75 total layers to keep costs down, and each layer between 10 – 500 nm to prevent stress
cracks in thick films. Using these constraints in tandem with the provided filter design goal, the thin-film
stack was optimized for incident angles between 0 - 10°. A representative stack design produced by
Optilayer for the design of Filter 2 is given in Fig. S5.
The actual design for the device experimentally demonstrated in the main text was slightly modified from
that of Fig. S5 by a thin-film foundry (Iridian), and the final design cannot be shared due to a non-disclosure
agreement. Nevertheless, the specifics of the design are not critical as long as it implements the desired
transmission spectrum (Fig. 2(b)).
Figure S5: Thin-film filter stack design for filter 2 (Fig. S3(a)), using Ta2O5 (n = 2.15, blue) and SiO2 (n = 1.46, red)
dielectric layers.
Comparison of CRT and LCD monitors:
The displays used in this work to generate metameric spectra were a True HD-IPS liquid crystal
display (LCD) on a LG G3 smartphone and a conventional cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor (Dell E770P).
These displays use very different mechanisms to generate colors, which results in significantly different
spectra when displaying the same color (i.e. metamers). The LCD display uses a backlight, typically a white
LED, which is transmitted through color filter arrays (red, green and blue color filters) to produce its color
response. Therefore, the emitted spectrum is the product of the LCD backlight and color filter transmission
response. The CRT monitor uses an electron gun, and relies on a phosphorescent screen to control its
spectrum in the visible wavelength range. Because the two display types use significantly different methods
to generate colors, the two emission technologies have different spectral features for the individual red,
20
green and blue color channels. The distinct features of the two displays are demonstrated in Figure S6(a),
which shows the measured emitted spectrum of white light from each display (RGB = [255, 255, 255]).
Figures S6(b, c) show the spectrum of each pure color channel (red, green and blue) for the LCD and CRT
display, respectively.
Figure S6: (a) Measured emission spectra of the LCD and CRT displays used in this work, displaying a white color
(RGB = 255, 255, 255). (b, c) Measured emission spectra of each individual color channel (R, G, B) for the LCD
and CRT display, respectively. For blue curves, the displayed color was RGB = (0, 0, 255), red curves RGB = (255,
0, 0), and green curves RGB = (0, 255, 0)
Color accuracy of photographs:
In this work, we used digitally generated color samples from spectroscopic data to demonstrate the
splitting of a metameric pair using an LCD and CRT monitor (Fig. 3). This method was used because, due
to the difference in spectral response between a camera sensor and the human eye, it is difficult to obtain a
precisely color-accurate photograph. This difficulty is shown in Figure S7, which shows the original
photograph of the experimental setup in Fig. 3(c), an edited photograph that better approximates the actual
color, and a digitally rendered color sample showing the “actual color”. The colors are rendered using CIE
matching functions, as described above; the [X,Y,Z] values calculated using the matching functions and
the measured spectrum can then be converted to the sRGB color space, which is the working color space
of most computers. Though the sRGB values will be the same across all display devices, the actual
displayed color depends on the calibration of the monitor used. Therefore, the rendered color is Fig. S7(c)
only represents the perceived color seen in the experiment when the monitor used to view the image has a
perfect color calibration.
It is clear that Fig. S7(a) is significantly different than the generated color sample in Fig. S7(c),
even though the camera used in S7(a) and the spectrometer used to acquire the sample that generated the
color in S8(c) sampled the same light. Fig. S7(b) is the figure used in the main text (Fig. 3(b)), and was
edited to more closely represent the color in S8(c) to prevent confusion. The rendered color samples using
spectroscopic data represent the perceived colors of both monitors much more accurately.
21
Figure S7: (a) Photograph of the setup shown in Fig. 3(c) of the main text, taken using a Sony α7R II camera. (b)
The edited photograph that appears in Fig. 3(b) of the main text, which was modified to appear close in color
to the rendered colors. This manipulation was performed to prevent confusion in the main text. (c) The actual
color displayed during the experiment, rendered using spectra acquired using a grating spectrometer and cosine
corrector.
Hyperspectral images
To demonstrate the utility of our wearable passive multispectral device in a more natural setting,
we acquired a hyperspectral image of a complex scene, and applied the filters digitally (Fig. S8). The
scene included a variety of blue and violet objects, including patches of color made using paints and
pastels, plants, and a Morpho butterfly featuring a structural blue color [S5]. The image was obtained
using a Middleton Spectral Vision MSV-500 High Sensitivity VNIR hyperspectral camera.
The enlarged images in Fig. S8d show the butterfly wing next to six similarly colored samples
made using oil pastels, with no filters applied. In Fig. S8e and Fig. S8f, filters 2 and 1, respectively, are
applied to these enlarged images. The numbers in each panel represent the CIE ΔE color difference between
the oil pastel color and the butterfly wing, averaged over a small area to reduce pixel noise. Using filter 2
(Fig. S8e), the appearance of the butterfly wing becomes more dissimilar to the pastel samples compared
to no filter (i.e., the butterfly “blue” becomes easier to distinguish from the pastel “blue” using the filter).
This again demonstrates the effect of partitioning the S cone to provide more spectral information. The
improvement is absent for filter 1 (Fig. S8f), demonstrating the need for both filters in the design. We note
that each filter creates a new set of metamers that may have been distinguishable before; by using two
filters, the set of overlapping newly created metamers becomes significantly smaller. Therefore, as long as
22
at least one filter creates an increase in contrast, more spectral information can be communicated to the
visual system while decreasing the overall number of possible metamers. Although a slight yellow/green
tint is applied to both filtered images, Fig. S8b and Fig. S8c have similar “white-balance” due to the whitebalance condition enforced during the design process.
Fig. S8: (a) RGB rendering of a hyperspectral image with natural and artificially colored objects, with no filter
applied. (b) The render with filter 2 applied, and (c) the render with filter 1 applied. (d) Magnified view of
butterfly wing and paint samples (outlined in green in (a)). (e) and (f) are the same samples as in (d), with
filters 2 and 1 applied, respectively. The numbers inside each paint sample are the ΔE color difference,
rounded to the nearest integer, between the paint sample and the butterfly wing with each respective filter
applied.
Supplementary References
S1. Giuseppe C, Ghaoui LE (2014) Optimization Models (Cambridge University Press).
S2. Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization (Cambridge University Press).
S3. Grant M, Boyd S CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1,
http://cvxr.com/cvx, October 2016.
S4. Schmeder AW, McPherson DM (2014) Multi-band color vision filters and method by lp-optimization.
S5. P. Vukusic, J. R. Sambles, C. R. Lawrence, R. J. Wootton, Quantified interference and diffraction in
single Morpho butterfly scales. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266, 1403–1411 (1999).
23
| 1cs.CV
|
Estimation under group actions: recovering orbits from invariants
arXiv:1712.10163v1 [math.ST] 29 Dec 2017
Afonso S. Bandeira∗1,2 , Ben Blum-Smith†1 , Amelia Perry‡3 , Jonathan Weed§3 , and
Alexander S. Wein¶k3
1
Department of Mathematics, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York
University, New York NY, USA
2
Center for Data Science, New York University, New York NY, USA
3
Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, USA
January 1, 2018
Abstract
Motivated by geometric problems in signal processing, computer vision, and structural biology, we
study a class of orbit recovery problems where we observe noisy copies of an unknown signal, each acted
upon by a random element of some group (such as Z/p or SO(3)). The goal is to recover the orbit of the
signal under the group action. This generalizes problems of interest such as multi-reference alignment
(MRA) and the reconstruction problem in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). We obtain matching
lower and upper bounds on the sample complexity of these problems in high generality, showing that the
statistical difficulty is intricately determined by the invariant theory of the underlying symmetry group.
In particular, we determine that for cryo-EM with noise variance σ 2 and uniform viewing directions,
the number of samples required scales as σ 6 . We match this bound with a novel algorithm for ab initio
reconstruction in cryo-EM, based on invariant features of degree at most 3. We further discuss how to
recover multiple molecular structures from heterogeneous cryo-EM samples.
1
Introduction
Many computational problems throughout the sciences exhibit rich symmetry and geometry, especially in
fields such as signal and image processing, computer vision, and microscopy. This is exemplified in cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) [ADLM84, SS11, Nog16], an imaging technique in structural biology that
was recently awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. This technique seeks to estimate the structure
of a large biological molecule, such as a protein, from many noisy tomographic projections (2-dimensional
images) of the molecule from random unknown directions in 3-dimensional space.
In cryo-EM, our signal of interest is the density θ of the molecule, considered as an element of the
vector space of functions on R3 . We have access to observations of the following form: our microscopy
sample contains many rotated copies Ri θ of the molecule, where Ri ∈ SO(3) are random, unknown 3D
∗ E-mail address: [email protected]. Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-1712730 and NSF grant DMS-1719545.
Part of this work was done while ASB was visiting the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing, this visit was partially
supported by the DIMACS/Simons Collaboration on Bridging Continuous and Discrete Optimization through NSF grant
#CCF-1740425.
† E-mail address: [email protected].
‡ E-mail address: [email protected]. Supported in part by NSF CAREER Award CCF-1453261 and a grant from the
MIT NEC Corporation.
§ E-mail address: [email protected]. Supported in part by NSF Graduate Research Fellowship DGE-1122374.
¶ E-mail address: [email protected].
k Authors are ordered alphabetically, please direct correspondence to [email protected].
1
rotations, and we observe the noisy projections Π(Ri θ) + ξi , where Π denotes tomographic projection (in a
fixed direction) and ξi is a large noise contribution, perhaps Gaussian. This specific problem motivates the
following general abstraction.
Fix a compact group G acting (by orthogonal transformations) on a vector space V . Throughout, the
vector space will be taken to be Rp and the group can be thought of as a subgroup of O(p), the orthogonal
group1 . Let θ ∈ V be the signal we want to estimate. We receive noisy measurements of its orbit as follows:
for i = 1, . . . , n we observe a sample of the form
yi = gi · θ + ξi
where gi is drawn randomly (in Haar measure2 ) from G and ξi ∼ N (0, σ 2 I) is noise. The goal is to recover
the orbit of θ under the action of G. We refer to this task as the orbit recovery problem.
This abstraction, already a rich object of study, neglects the tomographic projection in cryo-EM; we
will also study a generalization of the problem which allows such a projection. We will also consider the
additional extension of heterogeneity [Jon16, LS16, LS17, BBLS17], where mixtures of signals are allowed:
we have K signals θ1 , . . . , θK , and each sample yi = gi · θki + ξi comes from a random choice 1 ≤ ki ≤ K
of which signal is observed. This extension is of paramount importance for cryo-EM in practice, since the
laboratory samples often contain one protein in multiple conformations, and understanding the range of
conformations is key to understanding the function of the protein.
1.1
Prior work
Several special cases of the orbit recovery problem have been studied for their theoretical and practical
interest. Besides cryo-EM, another such problem is multi-reference alignment (MRA) [BCSZ14, BRW17,
PWB+ 17], a problem from signal processing [ZvdHGG03, PZAF05] with further relevance to structural
biology [Dia92, TS12]. In this problem, one observes noisy copies of a signal θ ∈ Rp , each with its coordinates
permuted by a random cyclic shift. This is an example of the orbit recovery problem when G is taken to be
the cyclic group Z/p acting by cyclic permutations of the coordinates. Since the cyclic group Z/p is simpler
than SO(3), understanding MRA has been seen as a useful stepping stone towards a full statistical analysis
of cryo-EM.
Many prior methods for orbit recovery problems employ the so-called synchronization approach where the
unknown group elements gi are estimated based on pairwise comparison of the samples yi . If the samples
were noiseless, one would have gi gj−1 yj = yi ; thus noisy samples still give some weak information about
gi gj−1 . Synchronization is the problem of using such pairwise information to recover all the group elements
gi (up to a global right-multiplication by some group element). Once the group elements gi are known, the
underlying signal can often be easily recovered.
The synchronization approach to cryo-EM can be summarized as follows [VG86, VH87, SS11]. By the
Fourier projection–slice theorem, the Fourier transforms of the tomographic projections are 2D slices of the
Fourier transform of the molecule density. Given a hypothesis as to the angles of two slices, we can predict a
1D line of intersection along which those slices should agree. By measuring correlation along that common
line, we obtain some weak information by which to confirm or refute our hypothesized angles. Indeed, this
test only depends on the relative angle of the slices, thus providing weak information about the value of
gi gj−1 . We then use a synchronization algorithm to recover the gi using this information.
Methods to solve the synchronization problem over various groups include spectral methods [Sin11, SS11],
semidefinite programming [Sin11, SS11, BCSZ14, BCS15, Ban15, BZS15], and approximate message passing
(AMP) [PWBM16a]. A general Gaussian model for synchronization problems over any compact group is
studied in [PWBM16b, PWBM16a]; ideas from statistical physics suggest that for this model, AMP is
1 We alert the reader to the fact that we will use O(p) to refer to the group of orthogonal matrices in dimension p and
O(g(n)) as the standard big-O notation: f (n) = O(g(n)) if and only if there exists a constant C such that f (n) ≤ Cg(n) for all
n sufficiently large. It will be clear from context which one is meant.
2 We note that any distribution of g can be reduced to Haar by left multiplying y by a Haar-distributed group element.
i
i
However, as illustrated in [ABL+ 17], it is sometimes possible to exploit deviations from Haar measure.
2
optimal among all efficient algorithms [PWBM16a]. However, the model does not capture the underlying
signal θ and instead assumes that for every pair i, j of samples, independent noisy measurements of the
relative group elements gi gj−1 are observed. This independence does not correctly capture problems like
MRA and cryo-EM, which have independent noise on each sample, rather than on each pairwise comparison
of samples.
The synchronization approach has proven to be effective both in theory and practice when the noise is
sufficiently small. However, once the noise level is large, no consistent estimation of the group elements
gi is possible [ADBS16]. Moreover, it is the high-noise regime that is the practically relevant one for
many applications, including cryo-EM, where the presence of large noise is a primary obstruction to current
techniques [Sig16]. As a result, recent work has focused on approaches to cryo-EM and MRA which provably
succeed even in the large-noise limit. One striking finding of this line of work is that the sample complexity
of the statistical estimation problem increases drastically as the noise level increases. For instance, for the
multi-reference alignment problem with noise variance σ 2 , consistent estimation of typical signals requires
Ω(σ 6 ) samples [BRW17, APS17], with significantly worse rates for atypical signals. By contrast, when σ 2
is smaller than some threshold, only O(σ 2 ) samples are required. Moreover, in contrast with the O(σ 2 )
rate—which would hold even in the absence of a group action—the Ω(σ 6 ) bound obtained in previous works
depends on particular properties of the cyclic group. In this work, we significantly extend this prior work by
determining the sample complexity of the estimation problem in the high-noise regime for general groups.
The leading theoretical framework for the high-noise regime is the invariant features approach [BRW17,
BBM+ 17, PWB+ 17, BBLS17, LBB+ 17]. This approach has a long history in the signal processing literature [Kam80, Sad89, SG92] and is analogous to the well known “method of moments” in statistics [vdV98].
In brief, the invariant features approach bypasses entirely the problem of estimating the group elements and
focuses instead on estimating features of the signal which are preserved by the action of the group. So long as
these invariant features uniquely specify the orbit of the original signal, the invariants are sufficient statistics
for the problem of recovering the orbit of the original signal. This simple approach yields optimal dependence
of the sample complexity on the noise level for the multi-reference alignment problem [BRW17, PWB+ 17].
The application of invariant features to cryo-EM dates back to 1980 with the work of Kam [Kam80], who
partially solved cryo-EM by means of degree-2 invariant features, reducing the unknown molecule structure
to a collection of unknown orthogonal matrices. Subsequent work has explored methods to estimate these
orthogonal matrices [BZS15], including recent work showing how two noiseless tomographic projections
suffice to recover these orthogonal matrices [LBB+ 17]. Our work can be viewed as a degree-3 extension of
Kam’s method that fully solves cryo-EM while circumventing the orthogonal retrieval issue, and without
requiring any noiseless projections. Our approach is ab initio, i.e. it does not require an initial guess of what
the molecule looks like and thus cannot suffer from model bias, which is a documented phenomenon [Coh13]
where the initial guess can have a significant effect on the result. Ab initio estimates are particularly useful
to serve as a model-free starting point for popular iterative refinement algorithms such as RELION [Sch12].
Throughout, we focus on the case where the group elements are Haar-distributed. In the basic orbit
recovery problem (projection), any distribution of gi can be reduced to Haar by left-multiplying each sample
yi by a Haar-distributed group element. However, as illustrated in [ABL+ 17], it is sometimes possible to
exploit deviations from Haar measure. The situation is different when we add projection to the problem
setup, as is the case with Cryo-EM; if the viewing direction is not distributed uniformly then there may exist
parts of the molecule that are systematically imaged less than others, which can cause serious difficulties in
reconstruction.
The present paper connects the orbit recovery problem to the invariant theory of groups, a classical
and well-developed branch of algebra (see for example [Kač94, Dol03, Stu08, DK15]). Invariant theory’s
traditional goal is to describe the ring of all polynomial functions on a vector space that are invariant under
the action of a group – the invariant algebra. Since the 19th century, culminating in the pioneering work of
David Hilbert [Hil90, Hil93], it has been known that the invariant algebra is finitely generated in many cases
of interest, and so a fundamental problem has been to bound the degrees of the generators. In 2002, Derksen
and Kemper [DK15] introduced the notion of a separating algebra – a subring of the invariant algebra that
separates all orbits of the group action which are separated by the full invariant algebra. Our connection
3
to orbit recovery motivates the question of bounding the degree required to generate a separating algebra
(see Section 4.4), a problem which has been recently studied [KK10, Dom16]. Our work also motivates the
question of bounding the degree at which the field of invariant rational functions is generated as a field (see
Section 4.3), which does not appear to have been the focus of research attention before.
1.2
Our contributions
In this paper we extend the results of [BRW17] and show that the method of moments yields optimal sample
complexity for orbit recovery problems over any compact group. Specifically, we show that optimal sample
complexity is achieved by an algorithm that estimates the moments from the samples and then solves a
polynomial system of equations in order to find a signal θ that would produce such moments. As the sample
complexity depends on the number of moments used, this gives rise to the algebraic question of how many
moments suffice to determine the orbit of θ. Using tools from invariant theory and algebraic geometry, we
investigate this question for various success criteria and obtain sharp results in a number of settings. Our
main focus is on the case where the signal is assumed to be generic and the goal is to output a finite list
of signals, one of which is the truth. In this case we give a simple efficient algorithm for determining the
number of moments required for any given orbit recovery problem. The main step of the algorithm is to
compute the rank of a particular Jacobian matrix.
We note that ours is an information-theoretic result rather than a computational one because even with
knowledge of the number of moments required, estimating the original signal still requires solving a particular
polynomial system of equations and we do not attempt to give a computationally-efficient method for this.
There are fast non-convex heuristic methods to solve these systems in practice [BBLS17] but we leave for
future work the question of analyzing such methods rigorously and exploring whether or not they reach the
information-theoretic limits determined in this paper. For the case of finite groups, another efficient method
for solving the polynomial system is via tensor decomposition, which has been analyzed for MRA [PWB+ 17].
Concrete results for problems such as MRA and cryo-EM are in Section 5.
1.3
Motivating examples
In addition to the examples of MRA and cryo-EM, it is helpful to have the following motivating examples
in mind:
1. Learning a “bag of numbers”: let G be the symmetric group Sp , acting on V = Rp by permutation
matrices. Thus we observe random rearrangements of the entries of a vector, plus noise.
2. Learning a rigid body: let G be the rotation group SO(p), acting on the matrix space V = Rp×m by
left-multiplication. We imagine the columns of our matrix as vertices defining a rigid body; thus we
observe random rotations of this rigid body (with vertices labeled) plus noise.
3. S 2 registration: Let S 2 ⊆ R3 be the unit sphere. Let V be the finite-dimensional vector space of
functions on S 2 → R that are band-limited, i.e. linear combinations of spherical harmonics up to some
fixed degree (spherical harmonics are the appropriate “Fourier basis” for functions on the sphere); let
θ ∈ V be such a function S 2 → R. Let G = SO(3), acting on the sphere by 3-dimensional rotation;
this induces an action on V via (g · θ)(x) = θ(g −1 · x). Thus we observe many noisy copies of a fixed
function on the sphere, each rotated randomly.
1.4
Problem statement
Throughout, we consider a compact (topological) group G acting linearly, continuously, and orthogonally
on a finite-dimensional real vector space V = Rp . In other words, G acts on V via a linear representation
ρ : G → O(V ), and ρ itself is a continuous function. Here O(V ) denotes the space of real orthogonal p × p
matrices. Let Haar(G) denote Haar measure (i.e., the “uniform distribution”) on G. We define the orbit
recovery problem as follows.
4
Problem 1.1 (orbit recovery). Let V = Rp and let θ ∈ V be the unknown signal. Let G be a compact group
that acts linearly, continuously, and orthogonally on V . For i ∈ [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} we observe
yi = gi · θ + ξi
where gi ∼ Haar(G) and ξi ∼ N (0, σ 2 Ip×p ), all independently. The goal is to estimate θ. Note that we can
only hope to recover θ up to action by G; thus we aim to recover the orbit {g · θ : g ∈ G} of θ.
In practical applications, σ is often known in advance and, when it is not, it can generally be estimated
accurately on the basis of the samples. We therefore assume throughout that σ is known and do not pursue
the question of its estimation in this work.
Our primary goal is to study the sample complexity of the problem: how must the number of samples n
scale with the noise level σ (as σ → ∞ with G and V fixed) in order for orbit recovery to be statistically
possible? All of our results will furthermore apply to a generalized orbit recovery problem (Problem 2.3)
allowing for projection and heterogeneity (see Section 1.6).
Our work reveals that it is natural to consider several different settings in which to state the orbit recovery
problem. We consider the following two decisions:
1. Do we assume that θ is a generic signal, or do we allow for a worst-case signal? (Here generic means
that there is a measure-zero set of disallowed signals.)
2. Do we want to output a θ′ such that θ′ (approximately) lies in the orbit of θ (unique recovery), or
simply a finite list θ1 , . . . , θs of candidates such that one of them (approximately) lies in the orbit of θ
(list recovery)?
The terminology “list recovery” is borrowed from the idea of list decoding in the theory of error-correcting
codes [Eli57]. By taking all combinations of the two options above, there are four different recovery criteria.
Strikingly, these different recovery criteria can be very different in terms of sample complexity, as the following
examples show (see Section 5 for more details):
1. Multi-reference alignment (MRA): Recall that this is the case G = Z/p acting on V = Rp by cyclic
shifts. It is known [PWB+ 17] that if θ is generic then unique recovery is possible with O(σ 6 ) samples.
However, for a worst-case θ, many more samples are required (even for list recovery); as shown in
[BRW17], there are some very particular infinite families of signals that cannot be distinguished without
Ω(σ 2p ) samples. This illustrates a large gap in difficulty between the generic and worst-case problems.
2. Learning a rigid body: Let G be the rotation group SO(p) acting on the matrix space Rp×m by left
multiplication. We imagine the columns of our matrix as vertices defining a rigid body; thus we observe
random rotations of this rigid body (with vertices labeled) plus noise. With O(σ 4 ) samples it is possible
to recover the rigid body up to reflection, so that list recovery (with a list of size 2) is possible. However,
unique recovery (even for a generic signal) requires drastically more samples: Ω(σ 2p ).
We will address all four recovery criteria but our main focus will be on the case of generic list recovery,
as it is algebraically the most tractable to analyze. For the following reasons we also argue that it is perhaps
the most practically relevant case. Clearly real-world signals are generic. Also, unique recovery is actually
impossible in some practical applications; for instance, in cryo-EM it is impossible to determine the chirality
of the molecule. Furthermore, one could hope to use application-specific clues to pick the true signal out
from a finite list; for instance, in cryo-EM we might hope that the spurious solutions in our finite list do not
look like “reasonable” molecules and can be thrown out.
1.5
Method of moments
Our techniques rely on estimation of the following moments:
Definition 1.2 (moment tensor). The order-d moment tensor is Td (θ) := Eg [(g · θ)⊗d ] where g ∼ Haar(G).
5
Pn
We can estimate Td (θ) from the samples by computing n1 i=1 yi⊗d plus a correction term to cancel bias
from the noise terms (see Section 7 for details). The moments Td (θ) are related to polynomials that are
invariant under the group action, which brings us to the fundamental object in invariant theory:
Definition 1.3 (invariant ring). Let x = (x1 , . . . , xp ) be a set of coordinate functions on V = Rp , i.e. a basis
for the dual V ∗ , so that R[x] := R[x1 , . . . , xp ] is the ring of polynomial functions V → R. We have an action
of G on R[x] given by (g · f )(·) = f (g −1 (·)). (If we fix a basis for V , we can think of x as indeterminate
variables corresponding to the entries of θ ∈ V .) The invariant ring R[x]G ⊆ R[x] is the ring consisting of
polynomials f that satisfy g · f = f for all g ∈ G. An element of the invariant ring is called an invariant
polynomial (or simply an invariant ). Invariant polynomials can be equivalently characterized as polynomials
of the form Eg [g · f ] where f ∈ R[x] is any polynomial and g ∼ Haar(G).
The two objects above are equivalent in the following sense. The moment tensor Td (θ) contains the same
information as the set of evaluations f (θ) for all f ∈ R[x]G that are homogeneous of degree d. In particular,
for any such polynomial f , f (θ) is a linear combination of the entries of Td (θ).
The following algebraic question will be of central importance: when do the values of invariant polynomials
(of degree ≤ d) of θ determine the orbit of θ (in the appropriate sense)? As we see below, the sample
complexity of the statistical problem is completely characterized by the answer to this question.
1.5.1
Warm up: hypothesis testing
Consider for now the simple problem of distinguishing between two fixed hypotheses θ = τ1 and θ = τ2 ,
where τ1 and τ2 are two fixed vectors in V . One method is to find an invariant polynomial f for which
f (τ1 ) 6= f (τ2 ) and to estimate f (θ) using the samples. The sample complexity of this procedure depends
on the degree of f because if f has degree d, we need O(σ 2d ) samples to accurately estimate f (θ). We will
prove the following (see Section 3).
Theorem 1.4 (distinguishing upper bound). Fix τ1 , τ2 ∈ V . If there exists a degree-d invariant polynomial
f ∈ R[x]G with f (τ1 ) 6= f (τ2 ) then, using O(σ 2d ) samples, it is possible to distinguish between θ = τ1 and
θ = τ2 with type-I and type-II error probabilities each at most 1/3.
Here, O(· · · ) hides factors that depend on G (and its action on V ), τ1 , and τ2 , but not σ; we are most
interested in how the sample complexity scales as σ becomes large (with everything else held fixed). The
error probability 1/3 is arbitrary and can be boosted by taking more samples (see Theorem 3.2).
Furthermore, we have a matching lower bound to show that the method of moments is optimal: the
sample complexity is driven by the minimum degree of an invariant polynomial that separates τ1 and τ2 .
Theorem 1.5 (distinguishing lower bound). Fix τ1 , τ2 ∈ V . Let d∗ be the smallest positive integer d for
∗
which Td (τ1 ) 6= Td (τ2 ). Then Ω(σ 2d ) samples are required to distinguish between θ = τ1 and θ = τ2 with
type-I and type-II error probabilities each at most 1/3.
See Section 3 for more details.
1.5.2
Recovery
We now address the problem of recovering the signal θ from the samples. Our goal is to recover the orbit of
θ, defined as follows.
G
G
Definition 1.6. For θ1 , θ2 ∈ V , define an equivalence relation ∼ by letting θ1 ∼ θ2 if there exists g ∈ G
G
such that g · θ1 = θ2 . The orbit of θ (under the action of G) is the equivalence class of θ under ∼, i.e. the
set {g · θ : g ∈ G}. Denote by V /G the set of orbits of V , that is, the equivalence classes of V modulo the
G
relation ∼.
We need the following definitions to capture the notion of approximately recovering the orbit of θ.
6
Definition 1.7. For θ1 , θ2 ∈ V , let
dG (θ1 , θ2 ) = min kθ1 − g · θ2 k2 .
g∈G
This pseudometric induces a metric on the quotient space V /G in the obvious way, so we can write dG (o1 , o2 )
for o1 , o2 ∈ V /G. By slight abuse of notation, we write dG (θ1 , o2 ) for dG (o1 , o2 ), where o1 is the orbit of θ1 .
Theorem 1.5 already shows that if the orbit of θ is not determined by knowledge of the first d − 1 moment
tensors, then at least Ω(σ 2d ) samples are required to recover the orbit of θ. We are now ready to (informally)
state our main result on recovery (see Section 3 for more details), which provides a matching upper bound.
Theorem 1.8 (recovery upper bound, informal). Fix θ ∈ V . If the moments T1 (θ), · · · , Td (θ) uniquely
b ≤ε
determine the orbit of θ, then using O(σ 2d ) samples, we can produce an estimator θb such that dG (θ, θ)
with high probability.
The analogous result holds for list recovery (see Section 3): if the moments determine a finite number of
possibilities for the orbit of θ then we can output a finite list of estimators, one of which is close to the orbit
of θ.
Thus, we have reduced to the algebraic question of determining how many moments are necessary to
determine the orbit of θ (either uniquely or in the sense of list recovery). In Section 4 we will use tools from
invariant theory and algebraic geometry in order to address these questions.
1.6
Extensions: projection and heterogeneity
We now consider some extensions to the basic orbit recovery problem (Problem 1.1), motivated by the
application of cryo-EM:
1. Projection: In cryo-EM, we do not observe a noisy 3-dimensional model of the rotated molecule;
we only observe a 2-dimensional projection of it. We will model this projection by a linear map
Π : Rp → Rq that maps a 3-dimensional model to its 2-dimensional projection (from a fixed viewing
direction). The samples are then given by yi = Π(gi · θ) + ξi where ξi ∼ N (0, σ 2 I).
2. Heterogeneity: In cryo-EM we observe images of many different copies of the same molecule, each
rotated differently. However, if our sample is not pure, we may have a mixture of different molecules
and want to recover the structure of all of them. We will model this by taking K different unknown
signals θ1 , . . . , θK along with positive mixing weights w1 , . . . , wK which sum to 1. Each sample takes
the form yi = gi · θki + ξi where ki is chosen at random according to the mixing weights.
In Section 2 we will formally define a generalization of the orbit recovery problem that allows for either (or
both) of the above extensions. All of our methods will apply to this general case.
1.7
Organization of the remainder of the paper
In Section 2, we define a generalization of Problem 1.1 which encompasses projection and heterogeneity,
and specify the basic algebraic objects which relate to our generalized problem. In Section 3, we formally
state statistical upper and lower bounds for the generalized orbit recovery problem in terms of invariants. In
Section 4, we establish our basic algebraic results and specify the algebraic criteria that correspond to the
different recovery criteria defined in Section 1.4. We also give an efficient algorithm to decide the algebraic
criterion corresponding to generic list recovery. Finally, in Section 5, we apply our work to several examples
of the orbit recovery problem, including MRA and cryo-EM. We conclude in Section 6 with questions for
future work.
Sections 7–9 contain proofs of results from preceding sections. Appendix A contains an account of the
invariant theory of SO(3), and Appendix B contains a proof (using Galois theory) of generic unique recovery
in a particular special case of the orbit recovery problem (the regular representation of a finite Abelian
group).
7
2
General problem statement
Our results will apply not only to the basic orbit recovery problem (Problem 1.1) but to a generalization
(Problem 2.3 below) that captures the projection and heterogeneity extensions discussed in Section 1.6. We
first define mixing weights for heterogeneous problems.
PK
Definition 2.1 (mixing weights). Let w = (w1 , . . . , wK ) ∈ ∆K := {(z1 , . . . , zK ) : zk ≥ 0 ∀k, k=1 zk = 1}.
w
Let k ∼ [K] indicate that k is sampled from [K] = {1, . . . , K} such that k = ℓ with probability wℓ . We
will sometimes instead parametrize the mixing weights by w k = wk − 1/K so that w lies in the vector space
PK
∆ := {(z1 , . . . , zK ) :
k=1 zk = 0}.
In a heterogeneous problem with K different signals, we can only hope to recover the signals up to permutation. To formalize this, our compound signal will lie in a larger vector space V and we will seek to recover
its orbit under a larger group G.
Definition 2.2 (setup for heterogeneity). Let G̃ be a compact group acting linearly, continuously, and
orthogonally on Ṽ = Rp . Let V = Ṽ ⊕K ⊕ ∆K , so that θ ∈ V encodes K different signals along with mixing
weights: θ = (θ1 , . . . , θK , w). We let an element (g1 , . . . , gK , π) of the Cartesian product set G̃K × SK act on
V as follows: first, each gk acts on the corresponding θk , and then π permutes the θk and the coordinates of
w. Note that this action is linear and orthogonal (where ∆ uses the usual inner product inherited from RK ).
There is a natural group structure G on the set G̃K × SK such that the action just described is actually a
group action by G: the semidirect product G = G̃K ⋊ϕ SK , where ϕ denotes the action of SK on G̃K by
permutations of the factors. This is also called the wreath product of G̃ by SK and written G̃ ≀ SK . The
product topology on G̃K × SK makes G a topological group; it is compact with respect to this topology since
all the factors are compact, and the action described above is continuous.
Of course, by taking K = 1 we recover the basic setup (without heterogeneity) as a special case. We are
now ready to give the general problem statement.
Problem 2.3 (generalized orbit recovery). Let Ṽ = Rp and W = Rq . Let G̃ be a compact group acting
linearly, continuously, and orthogonally on Ṽ . Let Π : Ṽ → W be a linear map. Let θ = (θ1 , . . . , θK , w) ∈
V := Ṽ ⊕K ⊕ ∆K be an unknown collection of K signals with mixing weights w ∈ ∆K . For i ∈ [n] =
{1, 2, . . . , n} we observe
yi = Π(gi · θki ) + ξi
w
where gi ∼ Haar(G̃), ki ∼ [K], ξi ∼ N (0, σ 2 Iq×q ), all independently. The goal is to estimate the orbit of θ
under G := G̃K ⋊ SK .
Note that this serves as a reduction from the heterogeneous setup to the basic setup in the sense that we are
still only concerned with recovering the orbit of a vector θ under the action of some compact group.
As discussed previously, we apply the method of moments. The moments are now defined as follows.
Definition 2.4 (moment tensor). For the generalized orbit recovery problem (Problem 2.3), the order-d
w
moment tensor is Td (θ) := Eg,k [(Π(g · θk ))⊗d ] where g ∼ Haar(G̃) and k ∼ [K]. Equivalently, Td (θ) =
PK
⊗d
].
k=1 wk Eg [(Π(g · θk ))
The invariant ring is defined as in Definition 1.3 but now for the larger group G acting on the larger V :
Definition 2.5 (invariant ring). Note that dim(V ) = Kp + K − 1 and let x = (x1 , . . . , xdim(V ) ) be a basis
for V ∗ ; here the last K − 1 variables correspond to ∆, e.g. they can correspond to w 1 , . . . , w K−1 . We then
let R[x]G ⊆ R[x] be the polynomials in x that are invariant under the action of G (as in Definition 1.3).
Recall that in the basic orbit recovery problem, Td (θ) corresponds precisely to the homogeneous invariant
polynomials of degree d; now Td (θ) corresponds to a subspace of the homogeneous invariant polynomials of
degree d. Specifically, the method of moments gives us access to the following polynomials (evaluated at θ):
8
Definition 2.6. Let UdT be the subspace (over R) of the invariant ring R[x]G consisting of all R-linear
T
combinations of entries of Td (x). Let U≤d
= U1T ⊕ · · · ⊕ UdT ⊆ R[x]G . Here we write Td (x) for the collection
of polynomials (one for each entry of Td (θ)) that map θ to Td (θ).
T
We will be interested in whether the subspace U≤d
contains enough information to uniquely determine
the orbit of θ (or determine a finite list of possible orbits) in the following sense.
Definition 2.7. A subspace U ⊆ R[x]G resolves θ ∈ V if there exists a unique o ∈ V /G such that f (θ) = f (o)
for all f ∈ U . Similarly, U list-resolves θ if there are only finitely many orbits o1 , . . . , os such that f (θ) = f (oi )
for all f ∈ U .
Here we have abused notation by writing f (o) to denote the (constant) value that f takes on every θ ∈ o.
The following question is of central importance.
T
Question 2.8. Fix θ ∈ V . How large must d be in order for U≤d
to uniquely resolve θ? How large must d
T
be in order for U≤d to list-resolve θ?
The answer depends on G and V but also on whether θ is a generic or worst-case signal, and whether
we ask for unique recovery or list recovery. Our statistical results in Section 3 will show that the sample complexity of the generalized orbit recovery problem is Θ(σ 2d ) where d is the minimal d from Question 2.8. More specifically, the recovery procedure that obtains this bound is based on estimating the
moments T1 (θ), . . . , Td (θ) and solving a system of polynomial equations to (approximately) recover θ. Our
algebraic results in Section 4 will give general methods to answer Question 2.8 for any G and V .
3
Statistical results
In this section, we state upper and lower bounds on the performance of optimal estimators for the orbit
recovery problem. Proofs are deferred to Section 7. Our approach will be the method of moments introduced
in Section 1.5. We assume for normalization purposes that there exists a constant c ≥ 1 such that c−1 ≤
kθk ≤ c, so that σ captures entirely the signal-to-noise ratio of the problem. We denote by Θ the subset of
V consisting of vectors satisfying this requirement.
Denote by Pθ the distribution of a sample arising from the generalized orbit recovery problem (Problem 2.3) with parameter θ.
Definition 3.1. Given θ ∈ Θ, the order-d matching set for θ, Mθ,d, is the set consisting of all τ ∈ V such
T
.
that f (τ ) = f (θ) for all f ∈ U≤d
T
T
list-resolves θ when
resolves θ exactly when Mθ,d contains a single orbit, and U≤d
We note that U≤d
Mθ,d is the union of a finite number of orbits.
We are now ready to state a formal theorem justifying Theorems 1.4 and 1.8, above. The following
theorem establishes that we can approximately learn the order-d matching set for θ with probability at least
1 − δ on the basis of O(σ 2d log(1/δ)) samples. Denote by Mεθ,d the ε-fattening of Mθ,d, i.e., the set of all
φ ∈ Θ such that minτ ∈Mθ,d kφ − τ k ≤ ε.
Theorem 3.2. For any positive integer n, noise level σ ≥ maxθ∈Θ kθk, and accuracy parameter δ > 0, there
cn = M
cn (y1 , . . . , yn ) ⊆ V such that, for any positive constant ε, if y1 , . . . , yn ∼ Pθ i.i.d.
exists an estimator M
and n ≥ cθ,ε,d log(1/δ)σ 2d , then with probability at least 1 − δ,
cn ⊆ Mεθ,d .
Mθ,d ⊆ M
The constant cθ,ε,d in Theorem 3.2 can be replaced by cθ,d ε−2 in the unique recovery setting if θ is
suitably generic, but the dependence on ε can be worse in general. What is key is that cθ,ε,d does not depend
on σ, so that Theorem 3.2 captures the behavior of the sample complexity in the large σ limit.
9
Theorem 3.2 essentially follows from the observation that, since the variance of yi is O(σ 2 ), a degree-d
T
polynomial in the entries of yi has variance O(σ 2d ). This implies that for any f ∈ U≤d
, the evaluation f (θ)
2d
can be accurately estimated on the basis of O(σ ) samples. By inverting a suitable polynomial system, we
can thereby identify Mθ,d , at least approximately. A full proof of Theorem 3.2 appears in Section 7.
Theorem 3.2 captures the behavior described in both Theorem 1.4 and Theorem 1.8. Indeed, if τ1 and τ2
differ on some f ∈ UdT , then Mτ1 ,d is separated from Mτ2 ,d , and Theorem 3.2 implies that we can therefore
distinguish between the two distributions when ε is sufficiently small. Moreover, as the following corollary
cn allows us to recover or list-recover the orbit of θ.
shows, Theorem 3.2 implies that the confidence set M
Corollary 3.3. Suppose that Mθ,d is the union of M orbits o1 , . . . , oM , where M is finite. There exists an
εθ such that, for ε < εθ , if n ≥ cθ,ε,d log(1/δ)σ 2d , then on the basis of n i.i.d. samples from Pθ we can produce
M estimators θb1 , . . . θbM such that, with probability at least 1 − δ, there exists a permutation π : [M ] → [M ]
satisfying
dG (θbi , oπ(i) ) ≤ ε
for all i ∈ [N ].
Proof. Since G is a compact group acting continuously on V , the orbits are compact. By assumption Mθ,d ,
is a union of a finite number of orbits, so there exists an εθ such that dG (oi , oj ) ≥ 4εθ for any i 6= j. For
cn as in Theorem 3.2. Theorem 3.2 implies the
any ε < εθ , let N be an ε/2-net of V /G, and construct M
existence of a constant cθ,ε,d such that as long as n ≥ cθ,ε,d log(1/δ)σ 2d , with probability at least 1 − δ,
cn ⊆ Mε/2 .
Mθ,d ⊆ M
θ,d
cn ) ≤ ε/2. With probability 1 − δ, any element
Consider the set C consisting of o ∈ N such that dG (o, M
of C is within ε of oi for some i ∈ [M ], and for each oi there exists an o ∈ C that is at most ε away. By
assumption, distinct orbits in Mθ,d are separated by more than 4ε, so if any two elements of C are separated
by at most 2ε, then they are close to the same element of Mθ,d . As a result, it is possible to partition C
into M sets C1 , . . . , CM such that dG (o, o′ ) ≤ 2ε if o, o′ are in the same set, and dG (o, o′ ) > 2ε if o and o′
are in different sets. For i ∈ [M ], let θbi be any element of V such that the orbit of θbi lies in Ci . The claim
follows.
The constant εθ in the statement of Corollary 3.3 will not be known in general. However, a weaker
cn under the projection V 7→ V /G.
statement still holds when ε ≥ εθ . Indeed, consider the image of the set M
There exists a finite partition of the resulting set such that any two orbits in the same cluster are closer
than any two orbits in different clusters. (Note that the clustering into a single set always satisfies this
requirement.) If we are able to choose this partition such that the diameter of each set is at most ε′ , then
by choosing a representative from each cluster, we obtain a finite set of estimators, at least one of which is
guaranteed to be ε′ -close to θ with high probability. Corollary 3.3 implies that this partition can be taken
to consist of at most M clusters for ε′ arbitrarily small, as long as n ≥ Cε′ σ 2d .
We now prove a lower bound showing that the dependence on σ in Theorem 3.2 is tight. We show that
T
if U≤d−1
fails to resolve (or list-resolve) θ, then Ω(σ 2d ) samples are necessary to recover (or list-recover) the
orbit of θ. Together with Theorem 3.2, this lower bound implies that if d∗ is the smallest positive integer
∗
for which UdT∗ resolves (or list-resolve) θ, then Θ(σ 2d ) samples are required to recover (or list-recover) the
orbit of θ. We make this lower bound precise in Theorem 3.4.
Theorem 3.4. For any positive integer d, there exists a constant cd such that if τ1 and τ2 are elements
in Mθ,d−1 lying in different orbits, then no procedure can distinguish between Pnτ1 and Pnτ2 with probability
greater than 2/3 if n ≤ cd σ 2d .
Note that via Le Cam’s method [LeC73], Theorem 3.4 translates into lower bounds for the problem of
recovering θ. The proof of Theorem 3.4 relies on a tight bound for the Kullbeck-Leibler divergence between
the distributions Po1 and Po2 established in [BRW17]. More details appear in Section 7.
10
4
Algebraic results
In this section, we will consider the four recovery criteria defined in Section 1.4, and give algebraic characterizations of each case. The results of Section 3 imply that it suffices to focus our attention on deciding
when a subspace U resolves (or list-resolves) a parameter θ. We show below how to answer this question
by purely algebraic means. Moreover, for generic list recovery, we show how this question can be answered
algorithmically in polynomial time. For generic and worst-case unique recovery, we also give algorithms to
decide the corresponding algebraic condition; however, these algorithms are not efficient.
Throughout, we assume the setup defined in Section 2 for the generalized orbit recovery problem. In
particular, G is a compact group acting linearly and continuously on a finite-dimensional real vector space
V (although we do not require in this section that the action be orthogonal). We have the invariant ring
T
R[x]G corresponding to the action of G on V , and a subspace U ⊆ R[x]G (e.g. U≤d
) of invariants that we
have access to. We are interested in whether the values f (θ) for f ∈ U determine the orbit of θ ∈ V under
T
G. The specific structure of G and U≤d
(as defined in Section 2) will be largely unimportant and can be
abstracted away.
4.1
Invariant theory basics
We will often need the following basic operator that averages a polynomial over the group G.
Definition 4.1 (Reynolds operator). The Reynolds operator R : R[x] → R[x]G is defined by
R(f ) =
E
[g · f ].
g∼Haar(G)
Note that the Reynolds operator is a linear projection from R[x] to R[x]G that preserves the degree of
homogeneous polynomials (i.e. a homogeneous polynomial of degree d gets mapped either to a homogeneous
polynomial of degree d or to zero).
Observation 4.2. Let R[x]G
d denote the vector space consisting of homogeneous invariants of degree d. We
can obtain a basis for R[x]G
d by applying R to each monomial in R[x] of degree d. (This yields a spanning
set which can be pruned to a basis if desired.)
In our setting, we have the following basic fact from invariant theory.
Theorem 4.3 (e.g. [Kač94] Theorem 4.1-3). The invariant ring R[x]G is finitely generated as an R-algebra.
In other words, there exist generators f1 , . . . , fm ∈ R[x]G such that R[f1 , . . . , fm ] = R[x]G .
Furthermore, there is an algorithm to find a generating set; see Section 8.1. Another basic fact from invariant
theory implies that the entire invariant ring is sufficient to determine the orbit of θ. (This is not always true
for non-compact groups; see Example 2.3.1 in [DK15].)
Theorem 4.4 ([Kač94] Theorem 6-2.2). The full invariant ring R[x]G resolves every θ ∈ V .
Proof. Let o1 , o2 ∈ V /G be distinct (and therefore disjoint) orbits. Since G is compact and acts continuously,
o1 and o2 are compact subsets of V . Thus by Urysohn’s lemma there exists a continuous function f˜ : V → R
such that f˜(τ ) = 0 ∀τ ∈ o1 and f˜(τ ) = 1 ∀τ ∈ o2 . The Stone–Weierstrass theorem states that a continuous
function on a compact domain can be uniformly approximated to arbitrary accuracy by a polynomial. This
means there is a polynomial f ∈ R[x] with f (τ ) ≤ 1/3 ∀τ ∈ o1 and f (τ ) ≥ 2/3 ∀τ ∈ o2 . It follows that
h = R(f ) is an invariant polynomial that separates the two orbits: h(o1 ) ≤ 1/3 and h(o2 ) ≥ 2/3.
Thus, in order to determine the orbit of θ it is sufficient to determine the values of all invariant polynomials.
(This condition is clearly also necessary in the sense that if the orbit is uniquely determined then so are the
values of all invariants.)
11
Remark 4.5. In what follows we will be discussing algorithms that take the problem setup as input (includT
ing G̃ and its action on Ṽ , along with Π, K) and decide whether or not U≤d
(for some given d) is capable of a
particular recovery task (e.g. list recovery of a generic θ ∈ V ). We will always assume that these algorithms
have a procedure to compute a basis for UdT (for any d) in exact symbolic arithmetic. This is non-trivial
in some cases because Td (x) (and thus UdT ) involves integration over the group (and may involve irrational
values), but we will not worry about these details here. For the important case of SO(3), it is possible to
write down a basis for the invariants in closed form (see Appendix A).
Remark 4.6. We will draw from various references for algorithmic aspects of invariant theory. The case of
finite groups is treated by [Stu08]. Although the invariant ring is sometimes taken to be C[x]G instead of
R[x]G , this is unimportant in our setting because the two are essentially the same: since our group action
is real, a basis for R[x]G (over R) is a basis for C[x]G (over C). The case of infinite groups is covered by
[DK15]. Here the group is assumed to be a reductive group over C (or another algebraically-closed field).
This means in particular that the group is a subset of complex-valued matrices that is defined by polynomial
constraints. Although compact groups such as SO(3) do not satisfy this, the key property of a reductive
group is the existence of a Reynolds operator satisfying certain properties; since this exists for compact
groups (Definition 4.1), some (but not all) results still hold in our setting.
4.2
Generic list recovery
We will see that the case of list recovery of a generic signal is governed by the notion of algebraic independence.
Definition 4.7. Polynomials f1 , . . . , fm ∈ R[x] are algebraically dependent if there exists a nonzero polynomial P ∈ R[y1 , . . . , ym ] such that P (f1 , . . . , fm ) = 0 (i.e. P (f1 (x), . . . , fm (x)) is equal to the zero polynomial).
Otherwise, they are algebraically independent.
Definition 4.8. The transcendence degree of a subspace U ⊆ R[x], denoted trdeg(U ) is the maximum value
of m for which there exist algebraically independent f1 , . . . , fm ∈ U . A set of trdeg(U ) such polynomials is
called a transcendence basis of U .
We now present our algebraic characterization of the generic list recovery problem.
Theorem 4.9 (generic list recovery). Let U ⊆ R[x]G be a finite-dimensional subspace. If trdeg(U ) =
trdeg(R[x]G ) then there exists a set S ⊆ V of full measure such that if θ ∈ S then U list-resolves θ.
Conversely, if trdeg(U ) < trdeg(R[x]G ) then there exists a set S ⊆ V of full measure such that if θ ∈ S then
U does not list-resolve θ.
The proof is deferred to Sections 8.2 and 8.3. A set has full measure if its complement has measure zero.
The intuition behind Theorem 4.9 is that trdeg(R[x]G ) is the number of degrees of freedom that need to be
pinned down in order to learn the orbit of θ, and so we need this many algebraically independent constraints
(invariant polynomials). Note that we have not yet given any bound on how large the finite list might be;
we will address this in Section 4.3.
In order for Theorem 4.9 to be useful, we need a way to compute the transcendence degree of both
R[x]G and U . In what follows, we will discuss methods for both of these: in Section 4.2.1 we show how to
compute trdeg(R[x]G ) analytically, and in Section 4.2.2 we give an efficient algorithm to compute trdeg(U )
T
for a subspace U . By taking U = U≤d
this yields an efficient algorithm to determine the smallest degree d
T
at which U≤d list-resolves a generic θ (thereby answering Question 2.8 for the case of generic list recovery).
4.2.1
Computing the transcendence degree of R[x]G .
Intuitively, the transcendence degree of R[x]G is the number of parameters required to describe an orbit of
G. For finite groups, this is simply the dimension of V :
Proposition 4.10 ([Stu08] Proposition 2.1.1). If G is a finite group, trdeg(R[x]G ) = dim(V ).
12
For infinite groups, the situation may be slightly different. For instance, if SO(3) acts on V = R3 in
the standard way (rotations in 3 dimensions), then a generic orbit is a sphere, with dimension two. This
means there is only one parameter to learn, namely the 2-norm, and we expect R[x]G to have transcendence
degree 1 accordingly. On the other hand, if SO(3) acts on a rich class of functions S 2 → R (as in the S 2
registration problem; see Section 5.4) then each orbit resembles a copy of SO(3) which has dimension 3. This
is formalized in the following.
Proposition 4.11 ([Dol03] Corollary 6.2). If G is an algebraic group, then
trdeg(R[x]G ) = dim(V ) − dim(G) + min dim(Gv ),
v∈V
where Gv is the stabilizer at v of the action of G (that is, the subgroup of all g ∈ G fixing v).
An alternate approach to the transcendence degree of R[x]G uses a central object in invariant theory:
the Hilbert series (see e.g. [DK15]).
G
Definition 4.12. Let R[x]G
consisting of homogeneous invariants of
d be the subspace (over R) of R[x]
G
degree d. The Hilbert series of R[x] is the formal power series
H(t) :=
∞
X
d
dim(R[x]G
d )t .
d=0
For a given G acting on V , there is an explicit formula (Molien’s formula) for the Hilbert series:
Proposition 4.13 ([Kač94] Remark 3-1.8). Let ρ : G → GL(V ) be the representation by which G acts on
V . Then for |t| < 1, H(t) converges and we have
H(t) =
E
g∼Haar(G)
det(I − t ρ(g))−1 .
This formula is tractable to compute, even for complicated groups; see Section 5.4 for details in the case of
SO(3). Once we have the Hilbert series, it is easy to extract trdeg(R[x]G ) as follows.
Proposition 4.14. The order of the pole at t = 1 of H(t) is equal to trdeg(R[x]G ).
The proof comes from [DK15]; see Section 8.4 for more details.
For heterogeneous problems (K > 1), the transcendence degree can be computed easily from the transcendence degree of the corresponding homogeneous (K = 1) problem.
Proposition 4.15. Let G̃ be a compact group acting linearly and continuously on Ṽ , and let G = G̃K ⋊ SK
act on V = Ṽ ⊕K ⊕ ∆K as in Definition 2.2. Let R[x]G be the invariant ring corresponding to the action of
G on V , and let R[x̃]G̃ be the invariant ring corresponding to the action of G̃ on Ṽ (i.e. the K = 1 problem).
Then trdeg(R[x]G ) = K · trdeg(R[x̃]G̃ ) + K − 1.
The proof can be found in Section 8.5. Note, however, that the result is intuitively reasonable by counting
parameters. We know trdeg(R[x̃]G̃ ) is the number of parameters required to describe an orbit of G̃ acting
on Ṽ . Thus, in the heterogeneity problem we have trdeg(R[x̃]G̃ ) parameters for each of the K signals, plus
an additional K − 1 parameters for the K mixing weights (since they sum to 1).
4.2.2
Algorithm for transcendence basis of U .
In this section we prove the following.
Theorem 4.16. There is an efficient algorithm to perform the following task. Given a basis {u1 , . . . , us }
for a finite-dimensional subspace U ⊆ R[x], output a transcendence basis for U .
13
Our first ingredient is the following simple classical test for algebraic independence (see, e.g., [ER93,
BMS13] for a proof).
Definition 4.17 (Jacobian). Given polynomials f1 , . . . , fm ∈ R[x] = R[x1 , . . . , xp ], we define the Jacobian
matrix Jx (f1 , . . . , fm ) ∈ (R[x])m×p by (Jx (f1 , . . . , fm ))ij = ∂xj fi where ∂xj denotes formal partial derivative
with respect to xj .
Proposition 4.18 (Jacobian criterion for algebraic independence). Polynomials f = (f1 , . . . , fm ) are algebraically independent if and only if the Jacobian matrix Jx (f ) has full row rank (over the field R(x)).
It suffices to test the rank of the Jacobian at a generic point x.
Corollary 4.19. Fix f = (f1 , . . . , fm ). Let z ∼ N (0, Ip×p ). If f is algebraically dependent then Jx (f )|x=z
does not have full row rank. If f is algebraically independent then Jx (f )|x=z has full row rank with probability
1.
Proof. An m × p matrix has deficient row rank if and only if either m > p or every maximal square
submatrix has determinant zero. Every such determinant of Jx (f ) is a polynomial in x; if this polynomial is
not identically zero then plugging in generic values for x will not cause it to vanish.
Remark 4.20. In practice we may choose to plug in random rational values for x so that the rank computation can be done in exact symbolic arithmetic. The Jacobian test will still succeed with overwhelming
probability (provided we use a fine enough mesh of rational numbers). Also note that if we find any value
of x for which the Jacobian has full row rank, this constitutes a proof of algebraic independence.
Remark 4.21. In some cases (e.g. if the polynomials involve irrational values) it may be slow to compute the
Jacobian rank in exact symbolic arithmetic. We can alternatively compute the singular values numerically
and count how many are reasonably far from zero. This method works reliably in practice (i.e., it is
extremely clear how to separate the zero and nonzero singular values) but does not constitute a rigorous
proof of algebraic independence.
Curiously, although the Jacobian criterion gives an efficient test for algebraic dependence, it is much
harder (#P -hard) to actually find the algebraic dependence (i.e., the polynomial relation) when one exists
[Kay09].
The Jacobian criterion implies the well-known fact that the collection of algebraically independent subsets
of R[x] form a matroid ; this is called an algebraic matroid (see e.g. [Sch03]). In particular, we have the
following exchange property:
Proposition 4.22. Let I, J be finite subsets of R[x], each algebraically independent. If |I| < |J| then there
exists f ∈ J r I such that I ∪ {f } is algebraically independent.
We next note that in the task from Theorem 4.16, a transcendence basis can always be taken from the
basis {u1 , . . . , us } itself.
Lemma 4.23. Let U be a finite-dimensional subspace of R[x] with basis B = {u1 , . . . , us }. If U contains r
algebraically independent elements, then so does B.
Proof. Let B ′ ⊆ B be a maximal set of algebraically independent elements of B. If |B| < r then by the
exchange property
(Proposition 4.22) there exists v ∈ U r B ′ such that B ′ ∪ {v} is algebraically independent.
Ps
Write v = i=1 αi ui . Since B ′ is maximal, we have from the Jacobian criterion (Proposition 4.18) that
for all 1 P
≤ i ≤ s, the row vector Jx (ui ) lies in the R(x)-span of B := {Jx (b)}b∈B ′ . But this means that
Jx (v) = si=1 αi Jx (ui ) lies in the R(x)-span of B. By the Jacobian criterion this contradicts the fact that
B ′ ∪ {v} is algebraically independent.
Proof of Theorem 4.16.
Let {u1 , . . . , us } be a basis (or spanning set) for U . From above we have that the transcendence degree of U
14
is the row rank of the Jacobian Jx (u1 , . . . , us ) evaluated at a generic point x. A transcendence basis for U
is the set of ui corresponding to a maximal linearly independent set of rows
We can use the following simple greedy algorithm to construct a transcendence basis. As input, receive
a list of polynomials {u1 , . . . , us }. Initialize I = ∅. For i = 1, . . . , s, add {ui } to I if I ∪ {ui } is algebraically
independent, and do nothing otherwise. (Note that this condition can be efficiently tested by Corollary 4.19.)
Output the resulting set I.
We now show correctness. Let Ii be the set after item ui has been considered (and possibly added), and
set I0 = ∅. It suffices to show that for each i ∈ {0, . . . , s}, Ii is a maximal independent subset of {u1 , . . . , ui }.
We proceed by induction. The claim is vacuously true when i = 0. Assume it holds for i − 1. If Ii is not
a maximal independent subset of {u1 , . . . , ui }, then there exists an independent set J ⊆ {u1 , . . . , ui } with
|J| > |I|, so by the exchange property (Proposition 4.22) there exists a uj with j ≤ i such that uj ∈
/ Ii and
Ii ∪ {uj } is independent. In particular, the subset Ij−1 ∪ {uj } of Ii ∪ {uj } is independent. But the fact that
uj was not added at the (j − 1)th step implies that Ij−1 ∪ {uj } is not independent, a contradiction. So Ii is
indeed maximal.
We obtain that I = Is is a maximal independent subset of {u1 , . . . , us }, and hence by Lemma 4.23 a
transcendence basis of U .
4.3
Generic unique recovery
For list recovery problems, the following gives an explicit upper bound on the size of the list.
Theorem 4.24. Let U be a subspace of the invariant ring R[x]G . Let FG be the field of fractions of R[x]G .
If [FG : R(U )] = D < ∞ then there exists a set S ⊆ V of full measure such that for any θ ∈ S, U list-resolves
θ with a list of size ≤ D.
The proof is deferred to Section 8.2. Here R(U ) is the smallest subfield of FG containing both R and U , and
[FG : R(U )] denotes the degree of a field extension; see Section 8.2 for more details. Since [FG : R(U )] = 1
is equivalent to R(U ) = FG , we have the following criterion for unique recovery.
Corollary 4.25 (generic unique recovery). If R(U ) = FG then there exists a set S ⊆ V of full measure such
that if θ ∈ S then U resolves θ.
The intuition here is that we want to be able to learn every invariant polynomial by adding, multiplying,
and dividing polynomials from U (and scalars from R). We need θ to be generic so that we never divide by
zero in the process.
Theorem 4.26. For a finite-dimensional subspace U ⊆ R[x]G , there is an algorithm to compute the degree
of the field extension from Theorem 4.24. As input, the algorithm requires a basis for U and the ability to
compute the Reynolds operator (Definition 4.1).
We give the algorithm and the proof in Section 8.6. The algorithm uses Gröbner bases and is unfortunately
inefficient to run in practice.
Additionally, in Appendix B we present a method for proving field generation using Galois theory. There
we use it to show generic unique recovery in the case where G is a finite Abelian group and V is its regular
representation (over R). These ideas may be helpful for proving generic unique recovery in other settings.
4.4
Worst-case unique recovery
We give a sufficient algebraic condition for worst-case unique recovery:
Theorem 4.27 (worst-case unique recovery). Let U ⊆ R[x]G be a finite-dimensional subspace with basis
{f1 , . . . , fm }. If U generates R[x]G as an R-algebra (i.e. R[f1 , . . . , fm ] = R[x]G ) then U resolves every θ ∈ V .
Proof. Every element of R[x]G can be written as a polynomial in the fi (with coefficients in R). This means
the values f1 (θ), . . . , fm (θ) uniquely determine all the values f (θ) for f ∈ R[x]G and so the result follows
because R[x]G resolves every θ ∈ V (Theorem 4.4).
15
Theorem 4.28. There is an algorithm to test whether or not U generates R[x]G as an R-algebra. As input,
the algorithm requires a basis for U and the ability to compute the Reynolds operator (Definition 4.1).
We give the algorithm and the proof in Section 8.6. The algorithm uses Gröbner bases and is unfortunately
inefficient to run in practice.
If G is a finite group, it is known that R[x]G has a generating set for which all elements have degree at
most |G| (this is Noether’s degree bound ; see Theorem 2.1.4 in [Stu08]). It follows that R[x]G
≤|G| resolves
every θ ∈ V . Recall (from Section 1.4) that this is tight for MRA: degree |G| is necessary for worst-case
signals.
A precise characterization of when U resolves every θ ∈ V is (by definition) that U should be a separating
set or (equivalently) should generate a separating algebra (see [DK15] Section 2.4). The notions of generating and separating sets do not always coincide, as illustrated by Example 2.4.2 in [DK15]. Furthermore,
generating sets may require strictly higher maximum degree [Dom16].
4.5
Worst-case list recovery
We give a sufficient algebraic condition for worst-case list recovery:
Theorem 4.29 (worst-case list recovery). Let U ⊆ R[x]G be a subspace with finite basis {f1 , . . . , fm }. If
R[x]G is finitely generated as a R[f1 , . . . , fm ]-module, then U list-resolves every θ ∈ V .
In other words, this condition says that there exists a basis g1 , . . . , gs ∈ R[x]G such that every element of
R[x]G can be written as a linear combination of g1 , . . . , gs with coefficients from R[f1 , . . . , fm ]. It is sufficient
to take U to be a set of primary invariants from a Hironaka decomposition (see Section 8.4).
Proof. Since R[x]G finitely generated as an R-algebra (Theorem 4.3), if R[x]G is finitely generated as a
R[f1 , . . . , fm ]-module then it follows that (see [Sha94] Section 5.3) every h ∈ R[x]G satisfies a monic polynomial
hk + ck−1 hk−1 + · · · + c1 h + c0 = 0
with ci ∈ R[f1 , . . . , fm ]. Letting h1 , . . . , hs be generators for R[x]G (as an R-algebra), we have that the values
f1 (θ), . . . , fm (θ) determine a finite set of possible values for h1 (θ), . . . , hs (θ), each of which determines (at
most) one orbit for θ.
5
Examples
In this section we work out some specific examples, determining the degree at which generic list recovery is
possible using the methods of Section 4.2. (We focus on generic list recovery because our algorithms for the
other recovery criteria are unfortunately too slow even for quite small examples.) We obtain several recovery
theorems for problems such as MRA and cryo-EM within finite ranges of parameters where we have verified
the Jacobian criterion using a computer, and beyond these parameter ranges, we state conjectural patterns.
The following themes emerge in the examples studied in this section. First, we see that many problems
are possible at degree 3, which is promising from a practical standpoint. Second, we do not encounter any
unexpected algebraic dependencies, and so we are able to show that heuristic parameter-counting arguments
are correct. In particular, we see that if there are enough linearly independent invariants, there are also
enough algebraically independent invariants.
5.1
Learning a bag of numbers
Let G be the symmetric group Sp acting on V = Rp by permutation matrices. The invariant ring consists of
the symmetric polynomials, which are generated by the elementary symmetric polynomials e1 , . . . , ep where
ei has degree i. Worst-case unique recovery is possible at degree p since R[x]G
≤p generates the full invariant
ring. Furthermore, degree p is actually required, even for generic list recovery. This is because any invariant
16
of degree ≤ p − 1 can be expressed as a polynomial in e1 , . . . , ep−1 and thus trdeg(R[x]G
≤p−1 ) = p − 1. So
this problem has a steep sample complexity of order σ 2p .
5.2
Learning a rigid body
Let G be the rotation group SO(p) acting on the matrix space Rp×m by left multiplication. We imagine
the columns of our matrix as vertices defining a rigid body; thus we observe random rotations of this rigid
body (with vertices labeled) plus noise. Let U ∈ Rp×m be such a matrix signal. With O(σ 4 ) samples,
we can estimate the degree-2 Gram matrix U ⊤ U ; taking a Cholesky factorization, we recover U up to left
action by an element of the larger group O(p). Thus we recover the rigid body up to a reflection ambiguity,
demonstrating list recovery (with a list of size 2). Surprisingly, assuming m ≥ p, we do not uniquely resolve
a generic signal until degree p, where with O(σ 2p ) samples we can estimate a p × p minor of U , which is a
degree-p invariant that changes sign under reflection.
The impossibility of unique recovery until degree p is a consequence of the “first fundamental theorem”
for the special orthogonal group SO(p), which asserts that the invariant ring is generated by the entries of
the Gram matrix U ⊤ U together with the p × p minors of U (see for instance [Kač94]); thus the invariants of
degree 3, . . . , p − 1 carry no information in addition to the degree-2 invariants.
5.3
Multi-reference alignment (MRA)
Recall that this is the case of G = Z/p acting on V = Rp by cyclic shifts. It is already known that for the
basic MRA problem (without projection or heterogeneity), generic unique recovery is possible at degree 3 for
any p [BRW17]. The methods of Section 4.2 confirm the weaker result that generic list recovery is possible
at degree 3 (at least for the values of p that we tested). Note the stark contrast in difficulty from the case
of the full symmetric group G = Sp above.
Remark 5.1. This result for MRA is actually a special case of a more general phenomenon. Let G be any
finite group and let V be the regular representation i.e. the space of functions f : G → R with the action
(g · f )(h) = f (g −1 h). (Note that for G = Z/p this is precisely the MRA problem.) It is known [Kak09]
that for this setup, the triple correlation (a collection of degree-3 invariants) is sufficient to resolve a generic
signal, and thus generic unique recovery is possible at degree 3. In Appendix B we give a short proof for the
special case where the group is Abelian; our proof illustrates a method based on Galois theory which may
be useful to prove generic unique recovery in other settings.
We can also verify that for MRA with p ≥ 3, generic list recovery is impossible at degree 2. This follows
from Theorem 4.9 because trdeg(R[x]G ) = p (since G is finite) but the number of algebraically independent
invariants of degree ≤ 2 is at most ⌊p/2⌋+1. We can see this as follows. A basis for the invariants of degree ≤ 2
is {R(x1 ), R(x21 ), R(x1 x2 ), R(x1 x3 ), . . . , R(x1 xs )} with s = ⌊p/2⌋+1. Here R denotes the Reynolds operator,
which averages over cyclic shifts of the variables. For instance, R(x1 x2 ) = p1 (x1 x2 +x2 x3 +x3 x4 +· · ·+xp x1 ).
Note that the basis above has size ⌊p/2⌋ + 2 but there is an algebraic dependence within it because R(x1 )2
can be written in terms of the other basis elements. The claim now follows.
Generic list recovery is possible at degree 1 for p = 1 and at degree 2 for p = 2. (This is true even for
worst-case unique recovery; recall from Section 4.4 that degree |G| is always sufficient for this.)
We now move on to variants of the MRA problem.
5.3.1
MRA with projection
We now consider MRA with a projection step. We imagine that the coordinates of the signal are arranged
in a circle so that G acts by rotating the signal around the circle. We then observe a projection of the circle
onto a line so that each observation is the sum of the two entries lying “above” it on the circle. This is
intended to resemble the tomographic projection in cryo-EM. We formally define the setup as follows.
17
Problem 5.2 (MRA with projection). Let p ≥ 3 be odd. Let V = Rp and G = Z/p acting on V by cyclic
shifts. Let q = (p − 1)/2 and W = Rq . Let Π : V → W be defined by
Π(v1 , . . . , vp ) = (v1 + vp , v2 + vp−1 , . . . , v(p−1)/2 + v(p+3)/2 ).
We call the associated generalized orbit recovery problem (Problem 2.3) MRA with projection. (We consider
the homogeneous case K = 1.)
Note that since p is odd, there is one entry v(p+1)/2 which is discarded by Π. The reason we consider the
odd-p case rather than the seemingly more elegant even-p case is because generic list recovery is actually
impossible in the even-p case. This is because the signals θ and θ + (c, −c, c, −c, . . .) cannot be distinguished
from the samples, even if there is no noise.
Restricting now to odd p, note that we cannot hope for generic unique recovery because it is impossible to
tell whether the signal is wrapped clockwise or counterclockwise around the circle. In other words, reversing
the signal via (θ1 , . . . , θp ) 7→ (θp , . . . , θ1 ) does not change the distribution of samples. We can still hope for
generic list recovery, hopefully with a list of size exactly 2. This degeneracy is analogous to the chirality
issue in cryo-EM: it is impossible to determine the chirality of the molecule (i.e. if the molecule is reflected
about some 2-dimensional plane through the origin, this does not change the distribution of samples).
It appears that, as in the basic MRA problem, generic list recovery is possible at degree 3. We proved
this for p up to 21 by checking the Jacobian criterion (see Section 4.2) on a computer, and we conjecture
that this trend continues.
Conjecture 5.3. For MRA with projection, for any odd p ≥ 3, generic list recovery is possible at degree 3.
Note that generic list recovery is impossible at degree 2 because the addition of the projection step to basic
T
MRA can only make it harder for U≤d
to list-resolve θ.
5.3.2
Heterogeneous MRA
We now consider heterogeneous MRA, i.e. the generalized orbit recovery problem (Problem 2.3) with G̃ = Z/p
acting on Ṽ = Rp by cyclic shifts, K ≥ 2 heterogeneous components, and no projection (i.e., Π is the identity).
We will see that generic list recovery is possible at degree 3 provided that p is large enough compared
to K. First note that the number of degrees of freedom to be recovered is trdeg(R[x]G ) = Kp + K − 1 (see
Propositions 4.10 and 4.15). Let us now count the number of distinct entries of Td (x) for d ≤ 3. Note that
Td (x) is symmetric (under permutations of indices) but we also have additional symmetries given by cyclic
shifts, e.g. (T3 (x))i,j,k = (T3 (x))i+c,j+c,k+c where c is an integer and the sums i + c, j + c, k + c are computed
modulo p. One can compute that T1 (x) has 1 distinct entry, T2 (x) has ⌊p/2⌋ + 1 distinct entries, and T3 (x)
has p + ⌈(p − 1)(p − 2)/6⌉ distinct entries. The total number of distinct entries is
U := p + 2 + ⌊p/2⌋ + ⌈(p − 1)(p − 2)/6⌉.
By Theorem 4.9, list recovery is impossible when U < Kp + K − 1. By testing the Jacobian condition, we
observe that the converse also appears to hold. We tested this up to K = 15 and up to the corresponding
critical p value.
Conjecture 5.4. For heterogeneous (K ≥ 2) MRA, generic list recovery is possible at degree 3 precisely if
U ≥ Kp + K − 1. This condition on U can be stated more explicitly as follows:
• K = 2 requires p ≥ 1.
• K = 3 requires p ≥ 12.
• K = 4 requires p ≥ 18.
• Each K ≥ 5 requires p ≥ 6K − 5.
18
Recent work [BBLS17] also studies the heterogeneous MRA problem. Similarly to the present work, they
apply the method of moments and solve a polynomial system of equations in order to recover the signals.
To solve the system they use an efficient heuristic method that has no provable guarantees but appears to
work well in practice. Their experiments suggest that if the signals have i.i.d. Gaussian entries, this method
√
succeeds only when (roughly) K ≤ p instead of the condition (roughly) K ≤ p/6 that we see above (and
that [BBLS17] also identified based on parameter-counting). Exploring this discrepancy is an interesting
direction for future work.
One question of particular interest is whether this example evinces a statistical-computational gap,
√
whereby all polynomial-time methods fail to succeed once K exceeds p. Some evidence for why we might
expect this is as follows. Recent work on tensor decomposition [MSS16] gives a polynomial-time algorithm
PN
p
to decompose a third order tensor of the form i=1 a⊗3
i + E where ai ∈ R are i.i.d. from the unit sphere
1.5
and E is noise, provided N ≤ p (up to factors of log p). The heterogeneous MRA problem can be cast as
such a tensor decomposition problem with N = Kp components ai ; the components are the p cyclic shifts
of each of the K signals. Although these ai are not independent, we expect that if the signals are random
then the ai are “random enough” for the same tensor decomposition result to hold, which exactly yields the
√
condition K ≤ p (up to factors of log p).
5.4
S 2 registration
Recall that this is the case where the signal θ is a real-valued function defined on the unit sphere S 2 in R3 .
The formal setup is as follows.
Let G = SO(3). For each ℓ = 0, 1, 2, . . . there is an irreducible representation Vℓ of SO(3) of dimension
2ℓ + 1. These representations are of real type, i.e. they can be defined over the real numbers so that
Vℓ = R2ℓ+1 . Let F be a finite subset of {0, 1, 2, . . .} and consider the orbit recovery problem in which G acts
on V = ⊕ℓ∈F Vℓ .
As intuition for the above setup, Vℓ is a basis for the degree-ℓ spherical harmonic functions S 2 → R
defined on the surface of the unit sphere S 2 ⊆ R3 . The spherical harmonics are a complete set of orthogonal
functions on the sphere and can be used (like a “Fourier series”) to represent a function S 2 → R. Thus the
signal θ ∈ V can be thought of as a function on the sphere, with SO(3) acting on it by rotating the sphere.
See Appendix A for details on spherical harmonics.
The primary case of interest is F = {1, . . . , F } for some F (the number of “frequencies”). We will see
that generic list recovery is possible at degree 3 so long as F ≥ 10. We will see that it is convenient to not
include 0 ∈ F , but we now justify why this is without loss of generality. V0 is the trivial representation, i.e.
the 1-dimensional representation on which every group element acts as the identity. In the interpretation of
spherical harmonics, the V0 -component is the mean value of the function over the sphere. We claim that the
S 2 registration problem with 0 ∈ F can be easily reduced to the problem with F ′ = F r {0}. This is because
the V0 -component is itself a degree-1 invariant; given the value of this invariant, one can subtract it off and
reduce to the case without a V0 -component (i.e. the case where the function on the sphere is zero-mean).
Thus we have that e.g. generic list recovery is possible (at a given degree) for F if and only if it is possible
for F ′ .
Using Proposition 4.11 we compute that trdeg(R[x]G ) = p − p′ , where
X
p = dim(V ) =
(2ℓ + 1)
ℓ∈F
and
0 ℓmax = 0
2 ℓmax = 1
where ℓmax = max ℓ.
p′ =
ℓ∈F
3 ℓmax ≥ 2
After all, V0 is the trivial representation on the 1-dimensional vector space, with 3-dimensional stabilizer
SO(3), and V1 is the standard 3-dimension representation of SO(3) on R3 by rotations, which yields a onedimensional SO(2) stabilizer at each nonzero point. When ℓmax ≥ 2, the representation V is known to have
zero-dimensional stabilizer at some points (see e.g. [Ete96]).
19
In the following we restrict to the case 0 ∈
/ F for simplicity (but recall that this is without loss of
G
generality). There are therefore no degree-1 invariants, i.e. R[x]G
1 is empty. By Theorem 4.9, if dim(R[x]2 ) +
G
G
dim(R[x]3 ) < trdeg(R[x] ) then generic list recovery is impossible at degree 3; this rules out generic list
recovery for F = {1, 2, . . . , F } when F ≤ 9. (We will see below how to compute dim(R[x]G
d ).) Beyond this
threshold, the situation is more hopeful:
Theorem 5.5. If F = {1, 2, . . . , F } and 10 ≤ F ≤ 16 then the degree-3 method of moments achieves generic
list recovery.
This theorem is based on computer verification of the Jacobian criterion for 10 ≤ F ≤ 16 using exact
arithmetic in a finite extension of Q. This result lends credence to the following conjecture.
Conjecture 5.6. Consider the S 2 registration problem with 0 ∈
/ F . We conjecture the following.
G
G
• Generic list recovery is possible at degree 3 if and only if dim(R[x]G
2 ) + dim(R[x]3 ) ≥ trdeg(R[x] )
G
G
(where trdeg(R[x] ) is computed above and dim(R[x]d ) can be computed from Proposition 5.7 below).
• In particular, if F = {1, 2, . . . , F } then generic list recovery is possible at degree 3 if and only if F ≥ 10.
The reason it is convenient to exclude the trivial representation is because it simplifies the parametercounting: if we use the trivial representation then we have a degree-1 invariant f and so there is an algebraic
relation between the degree-2 invariant f 2 and the degree-3 invariant f 3 .
We now discuss how to compute dim(R[x]G
d ). Using the methods in Section 4.6 of [DK15], we can give a
formula for the Hilbert series of R[x]G ; see Section 9.1. However, if one wants to extract a specific coefficient
dim(R[x]G
d ) of the Hilbert series, we give an alternative (and somewhat simpler) formula:
Proposition 5.7. Consider S 2 registration with frequencies F . Let χd (φ) : R → R be defined recursively by
χ0 (φ) = 1,
χ1 (φ) =
X
ℓ∈F
"
1+2
ℓ
X
m=1
#
cos(m φ) , and
d
χd (φ) =
Then we have
dim(R[x]G
d) =
1X
χ1 (iφ)χd−i (φ).
d i=1
1
π
Z
π
0
(1 − cos φ)χd (φ) dφ.
We give the proof in Section 9.2. Additionally, in Appendix A.6 we give explicit formulas for the invariants
(up to degree 3), which yields a combinatorial analogue of Proposition 5.7 (up to degree 3).
5.5
Cryo-EM
We adapt the following simple model for the cryo-EM reconstruction problem. We will use properties of the
3-dimensional Fourier transform, including the projection-slice theorem; see e.g. [Osg07] for a reference.
The signal is a 3-dimensional molecule, which we can think of as encoded by a density function f : R3 → R.
The 3-dimensional Fourier transform of f is fb : R3 → C given by
Z ∞Z ∞Z ∞
b
f (kx , ky , kz ) =
e−2πi(xkx +yky +zkz ) f (x, y, z) dx dy dz.
(1)
−∞
−∞
−∞
It is sufficient to learn fb because we can then recover f using the inverse Fourier transform. SO(3) acts
on the molecule by rotating it in 3-dimensional space (keeping the origin fixed). When f is rotated in
20
(x, y, z) coordinates, fb is also rotated in (kx , ky , kz )-coordinates by the same rotation. Each observation is
a 2-dimensional image obtained by first rotating f by a random element of SO(3) and then projecting f
parallel to the z axis. Specifically, the projection of f is fproj : R2 → R given by
Z ∞
fproj(x, y) =
f (x, y, z) dz.
−∞
By the projection-slice theorem, the 2-dimensional Fourier transform of fproj is equal to the slice fbslice : R2 →
C given by
fbslice (kx , ky ) = fb(kx , ky , 0).
Thus we think of fb as our unknown signal with SO(3) acting by rotation, and with post-projection which
reveals only the slice of fb lying in the plane kz = 0.
This does not yet conform to our definition of a (generalized) orbit recovery problem because the signal
needs to lie in a finite-dimensional real vector space. Instead of thinking of fb as a function on R3 , we fix a
finite number S of nested spherical shells in R3 , each of different radius and all centered at the origin. We
consider only the restriction of fb to these shells. We fix a finite number F of frequencies and on each shell
we expand fb (restricted to that shell) in the basis of spherical harmonics, truncated to 1 ≤ ℓ ≤ F . (As in S 2
registration, we can discard the trivial representation ℓ = 0 without loss of generality, and it is convenient
to do so.) Being the Fourier transform of a real-valued function, fb satisfies
fb(−kx , −ky , −kz ) = fb(kx , ky , kz )
(2)
(see (1)) and so we can use a particular basis Hℓm of spherical harmonics for which the expansion coefficients
are real; see Appendix A. We have now parametrized our signal by a finite number of real values θsℓm with
1 ≤ s ≤ S, 1 ≤ ℓ ≤ F , and −ℓ ≤ m ≤ ℓ. In particular, the restriction of fb to shell s has expansion
X
X
θsℓm Hℓm .
1≤ℓ≤F −ℓ≤m≤ℓ
SO(3) acts on each shell by 3-dimensional rotation; see Section A for the details of how SO(3) acts on spherical
harmonics. The projection Π reveals only the values on the equator z = 0 (or in spherical coordinates,
θ = π/2) of each shell. Using again the property (2), the output of Π on each shell has an expansion with
real coefficients in a particular finite basis hm ; see Section A.4.
Remark 5.8. There are various other choices one could make for the basis in which to represent the
(Fourier transform of the) molecule. Each of our basis functions is the product of a spherical harmonic and
a radial delta function (i.e. a delta function applied to the radius, resulting in a spherical shell). Another
common basis is the Fourier–Bessel basis (used in e.g. [LBB+ 17]) where each basis function is the product
of a spherical harmonic and a radial Bessel function. More generally we can take the product of spherical
harmonics with any set of radial basis function. It turns out that the choice of radial basis is unimportant
because the resulting problem will be isomorphic to our case (spherical shells) and so the same results hold.
We now present our results on the above cryo-EM model. We focus on identifying the regime of parameters
for which generic list recovery is possible at degree 3. Again using Proposition 4.11, we have for F ≥ 2:
trdeg(R[x]G ) = dim(V ) − 3 = S
F
X
ℓ=1
(2ℓ + 1) − 3 = S(F 2 + 2F ) − 3
(3)
where again we have a zero-dimensional stabilizer.
T
In Appendix A we give an explicit construction of the invariant polynomials in U≤3
. By testing the
Jacobian criterion in exact arithmetic on small examples, we arrive at the following theorem:
Theorem 5.9. Consider the homogeneous (K = 1) cryo-EM problem with S shells and F frequencies.
21
• If S = 1 then for any F ≥ 2, generic list recovery is impossible at degree 3.
• If 2 ≤ S ≤ 4 and 2 ≤ F ≤ 6, the degree-3 method of moments achieves generic list recovery.
The first assertion results from a simple counting argument: there are fewer invariants at degree ≤ 3 than
degrees of freedom. The second part is by confirming that the Jacobian of the invariants has rank equal to
trdeg(R[x]G ), through computer-assisted exact arithmetic over an appropriate finite extension of Q.
In floating-point arithmetic, we have further verified that the Jacobian appears to have appropriate rank
for 2 ≤ S ≤ 10 and 2 ≤ F ≤ 10, leading us to conjecture the following:
Conjecture 5.10. If S ≥ 2 then the degree-3 method of moments achieves generic list recovery (regardless
of F ).
T
Intuitively, when there is a single shell (S = 1) there are simply not enough invariants in U≤3
. However,
when S ≥ 2, the number of invariants increases dramatically due to cross-terms that involve multiple shells.
5.5.1
Heterogeneous cryo-EM
We now consider heterogeneous cryo-EM (K ≥ 2). By combining (3) with Proposition 4.15 we can compute
trdeg(R[x]G ). Based on testing the Jacobian criterion on small examples, we conjecture that the degree-3
method of moments achieves generic list recovery if and only if dim(U2T ) + dim(U3T ) ≥ trdeg(R[x]G ). In
T
other words, we expect no unexpected algebraic dependencies among U≤3
. (Recall that there are no degree-1
invariants since we are not using the trivial representation ℓ = 0).
In Section A.6 we give a conjectured formula for the exact value of dim(U2T )+dim(U3T ) for all S ≥ 1, F ≥ 2.
As a result we can determine for any given S ≥ 1 and F ≥ 2, the exact condition on K for which we believe
generic list recovery is possible. For S and F large, this condition is approximately K ≤ S 2 /4.
6
Open questions
We leave the following as directions for future work.
1. Our methods require testing the rank of the Jacobian on a computer for each problem size. It would
be desirable to have analytic results for e.g. (variants of) MRA in any dimension p.
2. We have given an efficient test for whether generic list recovery is possible, but have not given a
similarly efficient test for generic unique recovery. In cases where unique recovery is impossible, it
would be nice to give a tight bound on the size of the list; for instance, for MRA with projection, we
conjecture that the list has size exactly 2 (due to “chirality”), but we lack a proof for this fact. Our
algorithms for testing generic unique recovery are based on Gröbner bases, the calculation of which is
known to be computationally hard in the worst case [Huỳ86]. Unfortunately, the algorithms we have
proposed are also extremely slow in practice, though a faster implementation may be possible.
3. Our procedure for recovering θ from the samples involves solving a polynomial system of equations.
While solving polynomial systems is NP-hard in general, the fact that the polynomials used in the orbit
recovery problem have special structure leaves open the possibility of finding an efficient (polynomial
time) method with rigorous guarantees. Possible methods include tensor decomposition [PWB+ 17]
and non-convex optimization [BBLS17].
4. We have addressed the statistical limits of orbit recovery problems. However, prior work has indicated
the presence of statistical-to-computational gaps in related synchronization problems [PWBM16a], and
we expect such gaps to appear in orbit recovery problems too. As discussed in Section 5.3.2, the results
of [BBLS17] suggest a possible gap of this kind for heterogeneous MRA.
22
7
Proofs for Section 3: statistical results
We first prove Theorem 3.2. This theorem in fact holds for more general mixture problems, not merely those
arising from the orbit recovery problems defined in Problem 2.3. For convenience, we will state and prove
the theorem in its general form.
Problem 7.1 (mixture recovery). Let V = Rp , and let Θ ⊂ V be compact. For θ ∈ Θ, let µθ be a measure
on Rp whose support is contained in the unit ball, and assume the map θ 7→ µθ is continuous with respect to
the weak topology. Let D be a known distribution on R with finite moments of all orders, and let σ ≥ 1. For
i ∈ [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n}, we observe
yi = xi + σξi ,
where xi ∼ µθ and the entries of ξi are independently drawn from D. The goal is to estimate θ.
Write Pθ for the distribution arising from the parameter θ, and let Eθ be expectation with respect to
this distribution. We denote by Enθ the expectation taken with respect to n i.i.d. samples from Pθ . Where
there is no confusion, we also write Eθ for expectation with respect to the distribution µθ .
We require that µθ have bounded support; the requirement that it be supported in the unit ball is
for normalization purposes only. We assume throughout that σ ≥ 1. The following definiton gives the
generalization of Definition 3.1 to the mixture recovery problem.
Definition 7.2. Given a positive integer d and θ ∈ V , the order-d matching set Mθ,d is the set consisting of
all φ ∈ V such Eθ [x⊗k ] = Eφ [x⊗k ] for k = 1, . . . , d, where Eζ represents expectation with respect to x ∼ µζ .
Problem 7.1 generalizes Problem 2.3 by allowing the random vector xi to arise from more general mixtures
than those arising from group actions. Note that when the mixtures do arise from a generalized orbit recovery
problem, i.e., when xi = Π(gi · θki ), where gi and ki are distributed as in Problem 2.3, then Definition 7.2
reduces to Definition 3.1.
Having made these definitions, our goal in this section is to show that Theorem 3.2 holds word-for-word
in the setting of mixture recovery. To do so, we show that entries of the moment tensors Eθ [x⊗k ] can be
estimated on the basis of O(σ 2k ) samples from Pθ .
7.1
Estimation of moments
Our estimators will be based on a system of orthogonal univariate polynomials under the measure corresponding to D. Let H0 (x) = 1, and for k ≥ 1, define
Hk (x) = xk −
k−1
X
Eξ∼D [ξ k Hj (ξ)]
j=0
Eξ∼D [Hj (ξ)2 ]
Hj (x) .
It is easy to check that these polynomials are orthogonal under the inner product given by hf, gi =
Eξ∼D [f (ξ)g(ξ)] and that the polynomials H0 , . . . , Hk form a basis for the space of polynomials of degree
at most k. We denote them by Hk because they coincide with the classic Hermite polynomials when D is
Gaussian.
Like the Hermite polynomials, they satisfy the identity
Eξ∼D [Hk (x + ξ)] = xk .
Indeed, we can expand Hk (x + ξ) in the basis of the orthogonal polynomials as
Hk (x + ξ) =
k
X
j=0
23
αj (x)Hj (ξ) ,
(4)
where αj (x) is a polynomial in x of degree at most k−j. Since Hj (ξ) has zero mean for j ≥ 1 by construction,
we obtain
E[Hk (x + ξ)] = α0 (x) ,
and since Hk is a monic polynomial of degree k, we must have α0 (x) = xk .
We briefly review multi-index notation.
Definition 7.3. Q
A p-dimensional multi-index is a tuple α = (α1 , . . . , αp ) of nonnegative integers. For
α
p
x ∈ Rp , let xα = j=1 xj j .
Pp
For any multi-index α, we write |α| = j=1 αj . Given independent samples y1 , . . . , yn from Pθ , consider
the estimate for Ex∼µθ [xα ] given by
n
α :=
xf
α is unbiased.
We first show that xf
p
1 X Y αj
σ Hαj (σ −1 yi ) .
n i=1 j=1
α ] = E [xα ].
Lemma 7.4. For all θ ∈ Θ, Enθ [xf
θ
α is a sum of i.i.d. terms, it suffices to prove the claim for a single sample. By (4),
Proof. Since xf
Eθ
p
hY
j=1
h
i
σ αj Hαj (σ −1 yi ) = E
x∼µθ
= E
x∼µθ
= E
x∼µθ
E
ξ1 ,...,ξp ∼D
p
hY
E
ξj ∼D
j=1
p
hY
p
Y
j=1
i
σ αj Hαj (σ −1 (xj + σξj )) x
i
σ αj Hαj (σ −1 xj + ξj ) x
i
σ αj (σ −1 xj )αj = Eθ [xα ] .
j=1
It remains to bound the variance.
α] ≤
Proposition 7.5. For any multi-index α, there exists a constant cα such that for all θ ∈ Θ, Varθ [xf
−1 2|α|
cα n σ .
α is a sum of i.i.d. terms, it suffices to prove the claim for n = 1. Given a multi-index α, let
Proof.QSince xf
p
cα = j=1 supxj ∈[−1,1] Eξj ∼D [Hαj (xj + ξj )2 ], and note that cα is independent of σ. We obtain
α] ≤
Varθ [xf
E
x∼µθ
≤
p
hY
sup
E
ξ ∼D
j=1 j
p
Y
E
x:kxk≤1 j=1 ξj ∼D
≤ cα σ 2|α| ,
i
σ 2αj Hαj (σ −1 xj + ξj )2 x
2αj
σ Hαj (σ −1 xj + ξj )2
as claimed.
Finally, we apply the “median-of-means” trick [NY83] to show that we can combine the estimators defined
above to obtain estimates for the moment tensors Eθ [x⊗k ] for k ≤ d which are close to their expectation
with high probability.
24
Proposition 7.6. Let y1 , . . . , yn be i.i.d. samples from Pθ . For any degree d and accuracy parameter δ,
α = x
α (y , . . . , y ) for all α with |α| ≤ d such that with probability at least 1 − δ,
c
there exist estimators xc
1
n
r
log(p/δ)
α
d
α
c
max |Eθ [x ] − x | ≤ cd σ
,
α:|α|≤d
n
for some constant cd .
Proof. Split the samples into m subsamples of equal size, for some m to be specified, and for each α construct
α, . . . , x
α on the basis of the m subsamples. (We assume for convenience that m divides
f
the m estimators xf
m
1
α, . . . , x
α
α.
c
f
n.) Let x be the median of xf
m
1
Chebyshev’s inequality together with Proposition 7.5 implies that there exists a constant cd such that,
for each j = 1, . . . , m and multi-index α,
r i
h
m
α
d
α
Pr |xf
≤ 1/4 ,
j − Eθ [x ]| > cd σ
n
α, . . . , x
α are independent, a standard concentration argument shows that
f
and since the estimators xf
m
1
r i
h
m
α − E [xα ]| > c σ d
≤ e−m/4 .
Pr |xc
θ
d
n
By a “stars-and-bars” counting argument [Fel68], there are p+d
multi-indices α satisfying |α| ≤ d, so taking
d
a union bound over all choices of α yields
r
m
cα | ≤ cd σ d
max |Eθ [xα ] − x
α:|α|≤d
n
−m/4
with probability at least 1 − p+d
. Choosing m = 4 log( p+d
d e
d /δ) and taking cd sufficiently large in
the statement of the theorem yields the claim.
Note that the constant cd in the statement of Proposition 7.6 can be made explicit, given knowledge of
the distribution D.
7.2
Robust solutions to polynomial systems
We now show that approximate knowledge of the moment tensors Eθ [x⊗k ] for k = 1, . . . , d suffices to
approximately recover θ.
Lemma 7.7. For all θ ∈ Θ and ε > 0, there exists a ε′ > 0 such that, if φ ∈ Θ satisfies maxk≤d kEθ [x⊗k ] −
Eφ [x⊗k ]k∞ < ε′ , then there exists a τ ∈ Mθ,d such that kφ − τ k < ε.
Proof. We employ a simple compactness argument. Consider the set F = {φ ∈ Θ : ∀ τ ∈ Mθ,d kφ − τ k ≥ ε}.
Since Θ is compact, so is F . Set
ε′ = min max kEθ [x⊗k ] − Eφ [x⊗k ]k∞ .
φ∈F k≤d
⊗k
⊗k
Clearly if maxk≤d kEθ [x ] − Eφ [x ]k∞ < ε′ for some φ ∈ Θ, then there exists a τ ∈ Mθ,d such that
kφ − τ k < ε, so it remains to check that ε′ > 0.
Since θ 7→ µθ is continuous with respect to the weak topology and µθ is supported on a compact set
for all θ ∈ Θ, the moment map θ 7→ Eθ [x⊗k ] is also continuous for all k ≤ d. If φ ∈ F , then in particular
φ∈
/ Mθ,d, so there exists a k ≤ d for which Eθ [x⊗k ] 6= Eφ [x⊗k ]. Therefore ε′ > 0, as desired.
Lemma 7.7 is simply stating that the function φ 7→ minτ ∈Mθ,d kφ − τ k is continuous at θ with respect to
the topology induced by the moment maps. Note that, for generic θ when µθ arises from an orbit recovery
problem, the moment map will be continuously differentiable with a nonsingular Jacobian, so the inverse
function theorem implies ε′ can be taken to be Ω(ε). In general, however, the dependence could be worse.
25
7.3
Proof of Theorem 3.2
cα as in Proposition 7.6, and let
Construct the estimators x
(
)
r
log(p/δ)
α | ≤ c σd
cn = φ ∈ Θ : max |Eφ [xα ] − xc
M
d
n
α:|α|≤d
cn and that, for all
Applying Proposiiton 7.6, we have with probability at least 1 − δ that Mθ,d ⊆ M
c
φ ∈ Mn ,
r
log(p/δ)
⊗k
⊗k
α
α
d
.
max kEφ [x ] − Eθ [x ]k = max |Eφ [x ] − Eθ [x ]| ≤ 2cd σ
k≤d
n
α:|α|≤d
q
By Lemma 7.7, there exists an ε′θ,ε such that, as long as 2cd σ d log(p/δ)
< ε′θ,ε , then with probability at
n
cn ⊆ Mε .
least 1 − δ, we have the desired inclusion M
θ,d
Therefore taking n > (2cd /ε′θ,ε )2 log(p/δ)σ 2d = cθ,ε,d log(1/δ)σ 2d suffices.
7.4
Information geometry of gaussian mixtures
In this section, we establish an upper bound on the Kullbeck-Leibler divergence between different gaussian
mixtures, which we denote by D(· k ·).
The proof follows the outline used in [BRW17], based off a technique developed in [LNS99, CL11].
Proposition 7.8. Let θ, φ ∈ Θ, let the distribution D be N (0, 1) for some σ ≥ 1, and let d be any positive
integer.
There exist universal constants C and c such that if Eθ [x⊗k ] = Eφ [x⊗k ] for k ≤ d − 1, then
D(Pθ k Pφ ) ≤ C
(cσ)−2d
.
d!
Proof. We first establish the claim when d = 1. Note that the condition on the moment tensors is vacuous
in this case. By the convexity of the divergence,
D(Pθ k Pφ ) ≤
2
′
2
E D(N (x, σ ), N (x , σ )) =
x∼µ
θ
x′ ∼µφ
E
x∼µ
θ
x′ ∼µφ
kx − x′ k2
≤ 2σ −2 ,
2σ 2
where in the last step we used the fact that x and x′ lie in the unit ball almost surely.
Now, assume d > 1, so in particular Eθ [x] = Eφ [x]. Denote their common mean by v. For ζ ∈ {θ, φ}
denote by µζ the distribution of x − v when x ∼ µζ , and let Pζ denote distribution of y when y = x + ξ
for x ∼ µζ and ξ ∼ N (0, σ 2 I). Since this transformation is a deterministic bijection, the data processing
inequality implies D(Pθ k Pφ ) = D(Pθ k Pφ ).
Note that Eµθ [x] = Eµθ [x] = 0 and Eµθ [x⊗k ] = Eµφ [x⊗k ] for k ≤ d − 1. Hence without loss of generality
we can reduce to the case where µθ and µφ are both centered and are supported in a ball of radius 2.
We bound the χ2 -divergence between Pθ and Pφ . Let f be the density of a standard p-dimensional
Gaussian and for ζ ∈ Θ, let fζ be the density of Pζ , which can be written explicitly as
1
fζ (y) = Ex∼µζ σ −p f (σ −1 (y − x)) = σ −p f (σ −1 y)Ex∼µζ e− 2σ2 (x
2
−2y ⊤ x)
.
Since kxk ≤ 2 almost surely with respect µζ , Jensen’s inequality implies that
1
fζ (y) ≥ σ −p f (σ −1 y)e− 2σ2 (4−2y
⊤
Eζ x)
Recall that the χ2 divergence is defined by
χ2 (Pθ , Pφ ) =
Z
(fθ (y) − fφ (y))2
dy .
fθ (y)
26
2
= σ −p f (σ −1 y)e− σ2 .
(5)
Applying (5) to the denominator, expanding the definitions of fθ and fφ , and applying a change of variables
yields
Z
2
⊤
2
⊤
1
1
2
χ2 (Pθ , Pφ ) ≤ e2/σ
(Eθ e− 2σ2 (x −2y x) − Eφ e− 2σ2 (x −2y x) )2 σ −p f (σ −1 y) dy
Z
⊤
−1
−1
2
⊤
−1
−1
2
1
1
2/σ2
=e
(Eθ ey (σ x)− 2 kσ xk − Eφ ey (σ x)− 2 kσ xk )2 f (y) dy
2
= e2/σ E(Eθ eg
⊤
(σ−1 x)− 12 kσ−1 xk2
− Eφ eg
⊤
(σ−1 x)− 12 kσ−1 xk2 2
g ∼ N (0, I) .
) ,
(6)
Given ζ, ζ ′ ∈ Θ, let x ∼ µζ and x′ ∼ µζ ′ be independent. Then interchanging the order of expectation
and using the expression for the moment generating function of a standard Gaussian random variable, we
obtain
x⊤ x′
⊤
−1
′
−1
2
−1 ′ 2
1
Eζ,ζ ′ Eg eg (σ (x+x ))− 2 (kσ xk +kσ x k ) = Eζ,ζ ′ e σ2 .
Applying this expression to (6) after expanding the square produces
2
χ2 (Pθ , Pφ ) ≤ e2/σ E e
x∼µ
x⊤ x′
σ2
θ
−2 E e
x∼µ
θ
x′ ∼µθ
x′ ∼µφ
x⊤ x′
σ2
+
E e
x⊤ x′
σ2
x∼µφ
x′ ∼µφ
,
where in each expectation the random variables x and x′ are independent. Since µθ and µφ are compactly
supported, Fubini’s theorem implies we can expand each term as a power series and interchange expectation
and summation to produce
∞
−2k
2 X σ
E (x⊤ x′ )k − 2 E (x⊤ x′ )k + E (x⊤ x′ )k
χ2 (Pθ , Pφ ) ≤ e2/σ
x∼µφ
x∼µθ
x∼µθ
k!
′
′
′
k=0
= e2/σ
= e2/σ
= e2/σ
2
2
2
∞
X
k=0
∞
X
k=0
∞
X
k=d
x ∼µφ
x ∼µθ
σ
−2k
k!
x ∼µp hi
hEθ x⊗k , Eθ x⊗k i − 2hEθ x⊗k , Exφ x⊗k i + hEφ x⊗k , Eφ x⊗k i
σ −2k
kEθ [x⊗k ] − Eφ [x⊗k ]k2HS
k!
σ −2k
kEθ [x⊗k ] − Eφ [x⊗k ]k2HS ,
k!
where h·, ·i denotes the Frobenius inner product between tensors and k · kHS denotes the Hilbert-Schmidt
norm. Since under both µθ and µφ , kxk ≤ 2 almost surely, we have for all k ≥ 2,
kEθ [x⊗k ] − Eφ [x⊗k ]k2HS ≤ 2kEθ [x⊗k ]k2HS + 2kEφ [x⊗k ]k2HS ≤ 4k+1 .
Therefore
χ2 (Pθ , Pφ ) ≤ 4e2/σ
2
2
∞
d −2d
X
2 4 σ
4k σ −2k
≤ 4e6/σ
,
k!
d!
k=d
and applying the inequality D(Pθ k Pφ ) ≤ χ (Pθ , Pφ ) [Tsy09] proves the claim.
7.5
Proof of Theorem 3.4
If τ1 and τ2 are both in Mθ,d−1, then by Proposition 7.8, the corresponding distributions Pτ1 and Pτ2 satisfy
D(Pτ1 k Pτ2 ) ≤ (cσ)C2d d! . By the Neyman-Pearson lemma, for any test ψ using n samples,
s
r
1
Cn
n
n
Pr(ψ = 2) + Pr(ψ = 1) ≥ 1 − dTV (Pτ1 , Pτ2 ) ≥ 1 −
D(Pnτ1 k Pnτ2 ) = 1 −
,
τ2
τ1
2
2(cσ)2d d!
27
where we have applied Pinsker’s inequality and the chain rule for divergence. Therefore, to achieve an error
probability of at most 1/3, we must have n ≥ 2(cσ)2d d!/(9C) = cd σ 2d , as claimed.
8
8.1
Proofs for Section 4: algebraic results
Algorithm for generators of R[x]G
We know that R[x]G is finitely generated as an R-algebra (Theorem 4.3). There are various algorithms to
compute a finite set of generators for R[x]G [Stu08, DK15]. However, some require the group to be finite or to
be reductive over an algebraically-closed field. One algorithm that certainly works in our context (compact
groups) is Algorithm 2.2.5 in [Stu08]. As input it requires the Hilbert series of R[x]G (which can be computed
by Proposition 4.13) and a procedure to compute a basis for R[x]G
d (which can be done with the Reynolds
operator by Observation 4.2). The idea is as follows. We keep a set of proposed generators f1 , . . . , fm .
At each step we compare the Hilbert series of R[x]G with the Hilbert series of R[f1 , . . . , fm ] (which can be
computed using Gröbner bases). If these series differ at the td term, this means we are missing an invariant
at degree d. To remedy this, we create a new homogeneous invariant of degree d using the Reynolds operator,
and add it to our set of proposed generators. We repeat until the Hilbert series match.
8.2
Bounding the list size for generic signals
In this section we prove Theorem 4.24 and the first part of Theorem 4.9 (see Section 8.3 for the second part).
Recall the following basic definitions and facts from field theory.
Definition 8.1. If F2 is a subfield of F1 , we write F1 /F2 and call this a field extension. The degree of the
extension, denoted [F1 : F2 ], is the dimension of F1 as a vector space over F2 .
Proposition 8.2. Let R ⊆ F2 ⊆ F1 with F1 finitely generated (as a field) over R. Let r be the transcendence
degree of F1 (over R). The field extension F1 /F2 has finite degree if and only if F1 contains r algebraically
independent elements.
Proof. This is a basic fact of field theory. If F1 contains r algebraically independent elements then the
extension F1 /F2 is algebraic and finitely generated, and therefore has finite degree. Otherwise, the extension
is transcendental and has infinite degree.
In light of the above (and using the fact that R[x]G is finitely generated), Theorem 4.24 implies the first
part of Theorem 4.9 and so it remains to prove Theorem 4.24 (i.e. list size is bounded by D := [FG : R(U )]).
Proof of Theorem 4.24.
Write FU := R(U ). In characteristic zero, every algebraic extension is separable, so by the primitive element
theorem, FG = FU (α) for some α ∈ FG . Since α generates a degree-D extension, α is the root of a degree-D
polynomial
αD + bD−1 αD−1 + · · · + b1 α + b0
(7)
with coefficients bi ∈ FU . Furthermore, every element of FG can be expressed as
c0 + c1 α + · · · + cD−1 αD−1
with ci ∈ FU . In particular, let g1 , . . . , gk be generators for R[x]G (as an R-algebra) and write
(i)
(i)
(i)
gi = c0 + c1 α + · · · + cD−1 αD−1 .
(8)
(i)
Let S ⊆ V be the subset for which α and all the (finitely-many) coefficients bi , cj have nonzero denominators;
S is a non-empty Zariski-open set and thus has full measure. Now fix θ ∈ S. Given the values f (θ) for all
f ∈ U , each bi takes a well-defined value in R and so from (7) there are at most D possible values that α(θ)
can take. From (8), each value of α(θ) uniquely determines all the values gi (θ) and thus uniquely determines
all the values f (θ) for f ∈ R[x]G . Since R[x]G resolves θ (Theorem 4.4), this completes the proof.
28
8.3
Generic list recovery converse
In this section we prove the second part of Theorem 4.9 (the converse).
Let p = dim(V ), trdeg(U ) = q, and trdeg(R[x]G ) = r so that q < r ≤ p. Let f = {f1 , . . . , fm } be a basis
for U , and let g = {g1 , . . . , gr } be a transcendence basis for R[x]G . Let S ⊆ V be the set of points θ for
which the Jacobian Jx (f )|x=θ has row rank q and the Jacobian Jx (g)|x=θ has row rank r; by the Jacobian
criterion (see Corollary 4.19), S is a non-empty Zariski-open set and thus has full measure.
Fix θ ∈ S. For a sufficiently small open neighborhood X ⊆ S containing θ we have the following. The
Jacobian criterion on f implies that {τ ∈ X : f (τ ) = f (θ)} has dimension p − q. The Jacobian criterion on
g implies that every z ∈ g(X) has a preimage g−1 (z) := {τ ∈ X : g(τ ) = z} of dimension p − r. Since
p − q > p − r it follows that there are infinitely many θ1 , θ2 , . . . ∈ X such that f (θi ) = f (θ) but the values
g(θ1 ), g(θ2 ), . . . are all distinct (and thus the θi belong to distinct orbits). Therefore U does not list-resolve
θ.
8.4
Hilbert series and Hironaka decomposition
In this section we prove Proposition 4.14 on extracting the transcendence degree from the Hilbert series
(as the pole order at t = 1). While this is a general property of finitely generated algebras over a field,
there is an easy proof for invariant rings stemming from a key structural property of such rings called the
Cohen-Macaulay property or Hironaka decomposition.
Theorem 8.3 ([DK15] Section 2.6). The invariant ring R[x]G has the following structure. There exist
homogeneous primary invariants f1 , . . . , fr ∈ R[x]G and homogeneous secondary invariants g1 , . . . , gs ∈
R[x]G such that
• {f1 , . . . , fr } are algebraically independent, and
• any element of R[x]G can be written uniquely as a linear combination of g1 , . . . , gs with coefficients
from R[f1 , . . . , fr ].
The proof can be found in Section 2.6 of [DK15]; note that the only property of the group that is used is
the existence of a Reynolds operator (and so the proof is valid for compact groups).
Proof of Proposition 4.14.
The Hironaka decomposition above implies that the Hilbert series takes the form
Ps
tdeg(gj )
Qr j=1 deg(f )
i )
i=1 (1 − t
(this is equation (2.7.3) in [DK15]). It is now clear that the order of the pole at t = 1 is precisely r. But
we can see as follows that f1 , . . . , fr is a transcendence basis for R[x]G and so r = trdeg(R[x]G ). As in the
proof of Theorem 4.29, since R[x]G is a finitely generated R[f1 , . . . , fr ]-module, every h ∈ R[x]G satisfies a
polynomial with coefficients in R[f1 , . . . , fr ], which is an algebraic dependence among {f1 , . . . , fr , h}.
8.5
Transcendence degree for heterogeneity
In this section we prove Proposition 4.15. To recall the setup, we have G̃ acting on Ṽ with associated
variables x̃. We also have G = G̃K ⋊ SK acting on V = Ṽ ⊕K ⊕ ∆K with associated variables x. Let us also
introduce an intermediate group: G′ = G̃K , acting on V (with associated variables x).
(k)
(k)
Partition the variables x as follows. For k = 1, . . . , K, let x(k) = (x1 , . . . , xp ) be the variables
corresponding to signal k. Let z = (z1 , . . . , zK−1 ) be the variables corresponding to the mixing weights
PK−1
w 1 , . . . , w K−1 . Whenever we refer to zK , this is just shorthand for − k=1 zk .
We first prove a simpler version of the result without the action of SK .
29
Lemma 8.4. Let r̃ = trdeg(R[x̃]G̃ ) and let r = K r̃ + K − 1. Then
′
trdeg(R[x]G ) = r.
′
Proof. To show ‘≥’ we need to exhibit r algebraically independent elements of R[x]G . Letting f1 , . . . , fr̃ be
a transcendence basis for R[x̃]G̃ , it suffices to take
I := {fi (x(k) )}1≤i≤r̃,1≤k≤K ∪ {z1 , . . . , zK−1 }.
′
To show ‘≤’ we first recall that we can obtain a spanning set for the subspace R[x]G
d by applying the
Reynolds operator R (for G′ ) to each degree-d monomial (in the variables x). Such a monomial takes the
form
K
Y
mk (x(k) )
m(x) = M (z)
k=1
where M, mk are monomials. Applying the Reynolds operator yields
R(m(x)) =
E
g1 ,...,gk ∼G̃
M (z)
K
Y
k=1
mk (gk · x(k) ) = M (z)
K
Y
(k)
E mk (gk · x ).
k=1 gk ∼G̃
Note that R(m(x)) is the product of pure invariants, i.e. invariants that only involve variables from a single
one of the blocks x(1) , . . . , x(K) , z. It is clear that I (from above) is a maximal set of algebraically independent
pure invariants. It is now easy to show using the Jacobian criterion (Proposition 4.18) that if any R(m(x))
is added to I, it will no longer be algebraically independent. The result now follows using basic properties
of algebraic independence (Proposition 4.22 and Lemma 4.23).
Proof of Proposition 4.15.
′
Since R[x]G ⊆ R[x]G , it is clear (in light of the above) that trdeg(R[x]G ) ≤ r. Thus we need only to show
trdeg(R[x]G ) ≥ r by demonstrating r algebraically independent invariants. Let e1 , . . . , eK be the elementary
symmetric functions in K variables. With fi as above, we take the invariants
{ek (fi (x(1) ), . . . , fi (x(K) ))}1≤i≤r̃,1≤k≤K ∪ {e2 (z1 , . . . , zK ), . . . , eK (z1 , . . . , zK )}.
Note that e1 (z1 , . . . , zK ) is not included because it is equal to 0. The fact that ek (fi (x(1) ), . . . , fi (x(K) )) are
algebraically independent can be seen because {e1 , . . . , eK } is algebraically independent and {fi (x(k) )}i,k
is algebraically independent. We can see that {ek (z1 , . . . , zK )}k≥2 are algebraically independent as follows.
An algebraic dependence would be a polynomial P such that P (e2 (z2 , . . . , zK ), . . . , eK (z1 , . . . , zK )) (now
P
treating zK as a separate variable) has a root zK = − K−1
k=1 zk and thus has e1 (z1 , . . . , zK ) as factor.
But this contradicts the fact that any symmetric polynomial has a unique representation in terms of the
elementary symmetric polynomials.
8.6
Gröbner bases
In this section we show how to use Gröbner bases to test various algebraic conditions. In particular, we
prove Theorems 4.26 and 4.28. The ideas from this section are mostly standard in the theory of Gröbner
bases; see e.g. [CLO07] for a reference.
Definition 8.5. A monomial order on R[x] is a well-ordering on the set M of all (monic) monomials,
satisfying M ≤ N ⇔ M P ≤ N P for all M, N, P ∈ M. We will say that a monomial order favors a variable
xi if the monomial xi is larger (with respect to the monomial order) than any monomial not involving xi .
We write LM(f ) to denote the leading monomial of a polynomial f , i.e. the monomial occurring in f that is
largest (with respect to the monomial order); LM(f ) does not include the coefficient.
30
Definition 8.6. A Gröbner basis of an ideal I ⊆ R[x] is a finite subset B ⊆ I such that for every f ∈ I
there exists b ∈ B such that LM(f ) is a multiple of LM(b). We call B a reduced Gröbner basis if all its
elements are monic and it has the additional property that for every pair of distinct b, b′ ∈ B, no monomial
occurring in b is a multiple of LM(b′ ).
The following basic facts about Gröbner bases are proved in [CLO07]. A Gröbner basis is indeed a basis, in
that it generates the ideal. Every ideal I ⊆ R[x] has a Gröbner basis, and has a unique reduced Gröbner
basis. Buchberger’s algorithm computes the reduced Gröbner basis of an ideal I = hf1 , . . . , fm i, given a list
of generators fi . (It is not a polynomial-time algorithm, however.)
Suppose we are interested in the relations between polynomials f1 , . . . , fm ∈ R[x]. Introduce additional
variables t = (t1 , . . . , tm ) and consider the ideal I := hf1 (x) − t1 , . . . , fm (x) − tm i ⊆ R[x, t]. Given f1 , . . . , fm
there is an algorithm to compute a Gröbner basis for the elimination ideal
J := hf1 (x) − t1 , . . . , fm (x) − tm i ∩ R[t].
In fact, the algorithm is simply to compute a Gröbner basis for I using a particular monomial order and then
keep only the elements that depend only on t (see Chapter 3 of [CLO07]). The elimination ideal consists
precisely of the polynomial relations among f1 , . . . , fm :
Lemma 8.7. For any polynomial P ∈ R[t] we have: P ∈ J if and only if P (f1 (x), . . . , fm (x)) ≡ 0.
Proof. The direction ‘⇒’ is clear because if we let ti = fi (x) for all i then the generators of I vanish and
so every element of I vanishes. To show the converse, it suffices to show that for any polynomial P ∈ R[t],
P (f1 (x), . . . , fm (x)) − P (t1 , . . . , tm ) ∈ I. This can be shown inductively using the following key idea:
x1 x2 − t1 t2 =
1
1
(x1 − t1 )(x2 + t2 ) + (x2 − t2 )(x1 + t1 )
2
2
and so x1 x2 − t1 t2 ∈ hx1 − t1 , x2 − t2 i.
Generation as an R-algebra. Suppose we want to know whether fm ∈ R[f1 , . . . , fm−1 ]. This is equivalent
to asking whether there exists P ∈ J of the form
P (t) = tm − Q(t1 , . . . , tm−1 )
(9)
for some Q ∈ R[t1 , . . . , tm−1 ]. Suppose that J contains an element P of the form (9). Compute a Gröbner
basis B for J with respect to a monomial order that favors tm . The leading monomial of P is tm so by the
definition of a Gröbner basis there must be an element b ∈ B whose leading monomial divides tm . Since
1 ∈
/ J (by Lemma 8.7), the leading monomial of b is exactly tm and so b takes the form (9). Therefore,
fm ∈ R[f1 , . . . , fm−1 ] if and only if B contains an element of the form (9).
We can now prove Theorem 4.28: to test whether R[f1 , . . . , fm ] = R[x]G , compute generators g1 , . . . , gs
for R[x]G (see Section 8.1) and use the above to test whether each gi is in R[f1 , . . . , fm ].
Generation as a field. Suppose we want to know whether fm ∈ R(f1 , . . . , fm−1 ). This is equivalent to
asking whether fm can be expressed as a rational function of f1 , . . . , fm−1 (with coefficients in R), which is
equivalent (by multiplying through by the denominator) to asking whether there exists P ∈ J of the form
P (t) = tm Q1 (t1 , . . . , tm−1 ) − Q2 (t1 , . . . , tm−1 ) with Q1 ∈
/ J.
(10)
Suppose that J contains an element P of the form (10). Compute a reduced Gröbner basis B for J with
respect to a monomial order that favors tm . It is a basic property of Gröbner bases that P can be written as
X
pi (t)bi (t)
P (t) =
i
where pi ∈ R[t] and bi ∈ B with LM(pi ) ≤ LM(P ) and LM(bi ) ≤ LM(P ). If no bi involves the variable
tm then Q1 ∈ J, a contradiction. Therefore some bj must have degree 1 in tm . Since B is a reduced
Gröbner basis it cannot contain any element of the form (10) with Q1 ∈ J. This completes the proof that
fm ∈ R(f1 , . . . , fm−1 ) if and only if B contains an element of the form (10).
31
Degree of field extension. Consider the setup from Theorem 4.24: given a finite set U = {f1 , . . . , fm } ⊆
R[x]G , we want to compute [FG : FU ] where FU = R(U ) and FG is the field of fractions of R[x]G . We can
assume [FG : FU ] is finite (since we can efficiently test whether this is the case using Proposition 8.2 and
the methods of Section 4.2). Let d be such that R[x]G
≤d generates FG as a field (over R). (It is sufficient
G
for R[x]G
to
generate
R[x]
as
an
R-algebra;
such
a
d
can be computed via Section 8.1. If G is finite then
≤d
d = |G| is sufficient; see Section 4.4.) A generic element of R[x]G
≤d will generate the field extension:
Lemma 8.8. For all but a measure-zero set of α ∈ R[x]G
≤d , FG = FU (α).
This fact is related to the primitive element theorem. We include a proof for completeness.
Proof. The field extension FG /FU is finite and separable (since we’re in characteristic zero), so by the
fundamental theorem of Galois theory, there are only finitely many intermediate fields. (Take the normal
closure of FG /FU ; then the intermediate fields are in bijection with a finite group, and only some of them
lie inside FG .) Let L be the collection of intermediate fields of FG /FU that are proper subfields of FG . We
know R[x]G
≤d is a subspace of FG that generates FG and therefore is not contained by any field in L. This
G
means each field L ∈ L intersects R[x]G
≤d at a proper subspace VL of R[x]≤d . The finite union ∪L∈L VL is a
measure-zero subset of R[x]G
≤d , and any α outside of it satisfies FG = FU (α).
Let α be a generic element of R[x]G
≤d . In light of the above, [FG : FU ] is equal to the smallest positive
integer D for which there exists a relation
QD (f1 , . . . , fm )αD + · · · + Q1 (f1 , . . . , fm )α + Q0 (f1 , . . . , fm ) ≡ 0
for polynomials Qi with QD (f1 , . . . , fm ) 6≡ 0. This can be tested similarly to field generation. Compute
a reduced Gröbner basis B for the elimination ideal J ⊆ R[t1 , . . . , tm , τ ] consisting of the relations among
f1 , . . . , fm , α; use a monomial order that favors τ . Then [FG : FU ] is equal to the smallest positive integer
D for which B contains an element of degree D in τ (or ∞ if B contains no element that involves τ ). This
proves Theorem 4.26.
Remark 8.9. An alternative to using Gröbner bases for the above tasks is to solve a (very large) linear
system in order to find the minimal relation among a set of polynomials. There are bounds on the maximum
possible degree of such a relation (if one exists) [Kay09].
9
Proofs for S 2 registration
9.1
Formula for Hilbert series of R[x]G
We can derive the Hilbert series of R[x]G for S 2 registration using the methods in Section 4.6 of [DK15].
Proposition 9.1. Consider S 2 registration with frequencies F . For |t| < 1, the Hilbert series of R[x]G is
given by
X
H(t) =
Res(f, z)
z∈P
where
f (z) =
z
1 − 21 (z + 1/z)
−z N −2(1 − z)2
hQ
i
= Q
Qℓ
Qℓ
ℓ
m
m
m
2 ℓ∈F
ℓ∈F
m=−ℓ (1 − tz )
m=0 (1 − tz )
m=1 (z − t)
Q
P
with N = 12 ℓ∈F ℓ(ℓ + 1). Here Res(f, z) denotes the residue (from complex analysis) of the function f at
the point z, and P is the set of poles of f (z) inside the unit circle (in C). Namely, P contains t1/m e2πik/m
for all m ∈ {1, 2, . . . , maxℓ∈F ℓ} and for all k ∈ {0, 1, . . . , m − 1}. If N ≤ 1, P also contains 0.
32
Proof. Recall Molien’s formula (Proposition 4.13):
H(t) =
E
g∼Haar(G)
det(I − t ρ(g))−1 .
Note that det(I − t ρ(g)) depends only on the conjugacy class of g. In SO(3), two elements are conjugate
if and only if they rotate by the same angle φ. When g ∼ Haar(SO(3)), the angle φ = φ(g) is distributed
with density function π1 (1 − cos φ) on [0, π] (see e.g. [Sal79]). If g has angle φ, the matrix ρℓ (g) by which
it acts on the irreducible representation Vℓ has eigenvalues e−iℓφ , e−i(ℓ−1)φ , . . . , eiℓφ (see e.g. [Vve01]). The
matrix ρ(g) by which g acts on V = ⊕ℓ∈F Vℓ is block diagonal with blocks ρℓ (g). Using the above we write
an expression for the Hilbert series:
H(t) =
1
π
Z
π
0
1
1 − cos φ
dφ =
Qℓ
imφ )
2π
ℓ∈F
m=−ℓ (1 − te
Q
Z
0
2π
1 − 21 (eiφ + e−iφ )
dφ.
Qℓ
imφ )
ℓ∈F
m=−ℓ (1 − te
Q
Now write this as a complex contour integral around the unit circle in C and apply the residue theorem from
complex analysis to arrive at the result.
9.2
Formula for dimension of R[x]G
d
The dimension of R[x]G can be extracted as the coefficient of td in the Hilbert series from the previous
section, but here we give a different formula based on character theory from representation theory. The
character of a representation ρ : G → GL(V ) (where V is a finite-dimensional real vector space) is the
function χV : G → R defined by χV (g) = tr(ρ(g)).
In our case, using the eigenvalues of ρℓ (g) from the previous section, we have
χVℓ (g) = 1 + 2
ℓ
X
cos(m φ(g))
m=1
P
where φ(g) is the angle of rotation of g. For V = ⊕ℓ∈F Vℓ we then have χV (g) = ℓ∈F χVℓ (g).
As a representation of G = SO(3), R[x]d is (isomorphic to) the dth symmetric power of V , denoted
S d (V ). (This is using the fact that a real representation is isomorphic to its dual.) There is a recursive
formula for the character of S d (V ):
d
χS d (V ) (g) =
1X
χV (g i )χS d−i (V ) (g).
d i=1
This comes from the Newton–Girard formula for expressing complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials
in terms of power sum polynomials.
The representation R[x]d = S d (V ) decomposes as the direct sum of irreducible representations Vℓ . The
subspace of R[x]d consisting of all copies of the trivial representation V0 (the 1-dimensional representation
G
on which every group element acts as the identity) is precisely R[x]G
d . Thus, dim(R[x]d ) is the number of
copies of the trivial representation in the decomposition of R[x]d . This can be computed using characters:
dim(R[x]G
d ) = hχS d (V ) , χV0 i = hχS d (V ) , 1i where hf1 , f2 i := Eg∼Haar(G) [f1 (g)f2 (g)]. Since characters are class
functions (i.e. they are constant on conjugacy classes), we can compute this inner product by integrating
over the angle φ (as in the previous section). This yields the formula stated in Proposition 5.7.
Acknowledgements
ASW is grateful for feedback given by several members of the audience when he presented a preliminary
version of these results at a workshop dedicated to multi-reference alignment, organized as part of the Simons
Collaboration on Algorithms & Geometry.
33
References
[ABL+ 17]
Emmanuel Abbe, Tamir Bendory, William Leeb, João Pereira, Nir Sharon, and Amit Singer.
Multireference alignment is easier with an aperiodic translation distribution. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1710.02793, 2017.
[ADBS16]
Cecilia Aguerrebere, Mauricio Delbracio, Alberto Bartesaghi, and Guillermo Sapiro. Fundamental limits in multi-image alignment. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 64(21):5707–5722, 2016.
[ADLM84]
Marc Adrian, Jacques Dubochet, Jean Lepault, and Alasdair W McDowall. Cryo-electron
microscopy of viruses. Nature, 308(5954):32–36, 1984.
[APS17]
Emmanuel Abbe, Joao Pereira, and Amit Singer. Sample complexity of the boolean multireference alignment problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07540, 2017.
[Ban15]
Afonso S. Bandeira. Convex Relaxations for Certain Inverse Problems on Graphs. PhD thesis,
Princeton University, June 2015.
[BBLS17]
Nicolas Boumal, Tamir Bendory, Roy R. Lederman, and Amit Singer. Heterogeneous multireference alignment: a single pass approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.02590, 2017.
[BBM+ 17]
Tamir Bendory, Nicolas Boumal, Chao Ma, Zhizhen Zhao, and Amit Singer. Bispectrum
inversion with application to multireference alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00641, 2017.
[BCS15]
Afonso S. Bandeira, Yutong Chen, and Amit Singer. Non-unique games over compact groups
and orientation estimation in cryo-EM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.03840, 2015.
[BCSZ14]
Afonso S. Bandeira, Moses Charikar, Amit Singer, and Andy Zhu. Multireference alignment
using semidefinite programming. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Innovations in theoretical computer science, pages 459–470. ACM, 2014.
[BFB97]
Miguel A Blanco, M Flórez, and M Bermejo. Evaluation of the rotation matrices in the basis
of real spherical harmonics. Journal of Molecular Structure: Theochem, 419(1):19–27, 1997.
[BMS13]
Malte Beecken, Johannes Mittmann, and Nitin Saxena. Algebraic independence and blackbox
identity testing. Information and Computation, 222:2–19, 2013.
[Böh13]
Arno Böhm. Quantum mechanics: foundations and applications. Springer Science & Business
Media, 2013.
[BRW17]
Afonso Bandeira, Philippe Rigollet, and Jonathan Weed. Optimal rates of estimation for
multi-reference alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08546, 2017.
[BZS15]
Tejal Bhamre, Teng Zhang, and Amit Singer. Orthogonal matrix retrieval in cryo-electron
microscopy. In Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on,
pages 1048–1052. IEEE, 2015.
[CL11]
T. Tony Cai and Mark G. Low. Testing composite hypotheses, Hermite polynomials and
optimal estimation of a nonsmooth functional. Ann. Statist., 39(2):1012–1041, 2011.
[CLO07]
David Cox, John Little, and Don O’Shea. Ideals, varieties, and algorithms: an introduction to
computational algebraic geometry and commutative algebra. Springer New York, 2007.
[Coh13]
J. Cohen. Is high-tech view of hiv too good to be true? Science, 6145(341):443–444, 2013.
[Dia92]
R. Diamond. On the multiple simultaneous superposition of molecular structures by rigid body
transformations. Protein Science, 1(10):1279–1287, October 1992.
34
[DK15]
Harm Derksen and Gregor Kemper. Computational invariant theory. Springer, 2015.
[Dol03]
Igor Dolgachev. Lectures on invariant theory, volume 296. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[Dom16]
M. Domokos. Degree bounds for separating invariants of abelian groups. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1602.06597, 2016.
[Eli57]
Peter Elias. List decoding for noisy channels. Technical Report 335, Research Laboratory of
Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1957.
[ER93]
Richard Ehrenborg and Gian-Carlo Rota. Apolarity and canonical forms for homogeneous
polynomials. European Journal of Combinatorics, 14(3):157–181, 1993.
[Ete96]
Gábor Etesi. Spontaneous symmetry breaking in the SO(3) gauge theory to discrete subgroups.
Journal of Mathematical Physics, 37(4):1596–1601, 1996.
[Fel68]
W. Feller. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, volume 1. Wiley, 1968.
[Hil90]
David Hilbert. Über die Theorie der algebraischen Formen. Mathematische Annalen, 36:473–
531, 1890.
[Hil93]
David Hilbert. Über die vollen Invariantensysteme. Mathematische Annalen, 42:313–370, 1893.
[Huỳ86]
Dũng T. Huỳnh. A superexponential lower bound for Gröbner bases and Church-Rosser commutative Thue systems. Inform. and Control, 68(1-3):196–206, 1986.
[Jon16]
Slavica Jonić. Cryo-electron microscopy analysis of structurally heterogeneous macromolecular
complexes. Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 14:385–390, 2016.
[Kač94]
Victor Kač. Invariant theory [lecture notes]. https://people.kth.se/~laksov/notes/invariant.pdf,
1994.
[Kak09]
Ramakrishna Kakarala. Completeness of bispectrum on compact groups. arXiv preprint
arXiv:0902.0196, 1, 2009.
[Kam80]
Zvi Kam. The reconstruction of structure from electron micrographs of randomly oriented
particles. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 82(1):15–39, 1980.
[Kay09]
Neeraj Kayal. The complexity of the annihilating polynomial. In 24th Annual IEEE Conference
on Computational Complexity (CCC’09), pages 184–193. IEEE, 2009.
[KK10]
Martin Kohls and Hanspeter Kraft. Degree bounds for separating invariants. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1001.5216, 2010.
[LBB+ 17]
Eitan Levin, Tamir Bendory, Nicolas Boumal, Joe Kileel, and Amit Singer. 3D ab initio
modeling in cryo-EM by autocorrelation analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.08076, 2017.
[LeC73]
L. LeCam. Convergence of estimates under dimensionality restrictions. Ann. Statist., 1:38–53,
1973.
[LNS99]
O. Lepski, A. Nemirovski, and V. Spokoiny. On estimation of the Lr norm of a regression
function. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 113(2):221–253, 1999.
[LS16]
Roy R. Lederman and Amit Singer. A representation theory perspective on simultaneous
alignment and classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.03464, 2016.
[LS17]
Roy R Lederman and Amit Singer. Continuously heterogeneous hyper-objects in cryo-EM and
3-D movies of many temporal dimensions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02899, 2017.
35
[MSS16]
Tengyu Ma, Jonathan Shi, and David Steurer. Polynomial-time tensor decompositions with
sum-of-squares. In Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on, pages 438–446. IEEE, 2016.
[Nog16]
Eva Nogales. The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique.
Nature methods, 13(1):24–27, 2016.
[NY83]
A. S. Nemirovsky and D. B. and Yudin. Problem complexity and method efficiency in optimization. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1983. Translated
from the Russian and with a preface by E. R. Dawson, Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete
Mathematics.
[Osg07]
Brad Osgood.
Chapter 8:
n-dimensional Fourier Transform.
Lecture Notes for EE 261:
The Fourier Transform and its Applications.
https://see.stanford.edu/materials/lsoftaee261/book-fall-07.pdf, 2007.
[PWB+ 17]
Amelia Perry, Jonathan Weed, Afonso Bandeira, Philippe Rigollet, and Amit Singer. The
sample complexity of multi-reference alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00943, 2017.
[PWBM16a] Amelia Perry, Alexander S Wein, Afonso S. Bandeira, and Ankur Moitra. Message-passing algorithms for synchronization problems over compact groups. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.04583,
2016.
[PWBM16b] Amelia Perry, Alexander S. Wein, Afonso S. Bandeira, and Ankur Moitra. Optimality and
sub-optimality of PCA for spiked random matrices and synchronization. arXiv:1609.05573,
2016.
[PZAF05]
R. G. Pita, M. R. Zurera, P. J. Amores, and F. L. Ferreras. Using multilayer perceptrons to
align high range resolution radar signals. In Artificial Neural Networks: Formal Models and
Their Applications - ICANN 2005, pages 911–916. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
[Ros57]
Morris E Rose. Elementary theory of angular momentum. Physics Today, 10:30, 1957.
[Sad89]
B. M. Sadler. Shift and rotation invariant object reconstruction using the bispectrum. In
Workshop on Higher-Order Spectral Analysis, pages 106–111, Jun 1989.
[Sal79]
Eugene Salamin. Application of quaternions to computation with rotations. Technical report,
Working Paper, 1979.
[Sch03]
Alexander Schrijver. Combinatorial optimization: polyhedra and efficiency. Springer Science
& Business Media, 2003.
[Sch12]
S. H. W. Scheres. RELION: implementation of a bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure
determination. J. Struct. Biol., 180(3):519–530, 2012.
[SG92]
Brian M Sadler and Georgios B Giannakis. Shift-and rotation-invariant object reconstruction
using the bispectrum. JOSA A, 9(1):57–69, 1992.
[Sha94]
Igor R. Shafarevich. Basic algebraic geometry. Springer, 1994.
[Sig16]
Fred J. Sigworth. Principles of cryo-EM single-particle image processing. Microscopy, 65(1):57–
67, 2016.
[Sin11]
Amit Singer. Angular synchronization by eigenvectors and semidefinite programming. Applied
and computational harmonic analysis, 30(1):20–36, 2011.
36
[SS11]
Amit Singer and Yoel Shkolnisky. Three-dimensional structure determination from common
lines in cryo-EM by eigenvectors and semidefinite programming. SIAM Journal on Imaging
Sciences, 4(2):543–572, 2011.
[Stu08]
Bernd Sturmfels. Algorithms in invariant theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
[TS12]
D. L. Theobald and P. A. Steindel. Optimal simultaneous superpositioning of multiple structures with missing data. Bioinformatics, 28(15):1972–1979, 2012.
[Tsy09]
Alexandre B. Tsybakov. Introduction to nonparametric estimation. Springer Series in Statistics.
Springer, New York, 2009. Revised and extended from the 2004 French original, Translated
by Vladimir Zaiats.
[vdV98]
A. W. van der Vaart. Asymptotic statistics, volume 3 of Cambridge Series in Statistical and
Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
[VG86]
BK Vainshtein and AB Goncharov. Determination of the spatial orientation of arbitrarily
arranged identical particles of unknown structure from their projections. In Soviet Physics
Doklady, volume 31, page 278, 1986.
[VH87]
Marin Van Heel. Angular reconstitution: a posteriori assignment of projection directions for
3D reconstruction. Ultramicroscopy, 21(2):111–123, 1987.
[Vve01]
Dimitri
Vvedensky.
Chapter
8:
Irreducible
Representations
of
SO(2)
and
SO(3).
Group
theory
course
[lecture
notes].
http://www.cmth.ph.ic.ac.uk/people/d.vvedensky/groups/Chapter8.pdf, 2001.
[ZvdHGG03] J. P. Zwart, R. van der Heiden, S. Gelsema, and F. Groen. Fast translation invariant classification of HRR range profiles in a zero phase representation. Radar, Sonar and Navigation,
IEE Proceedings, 150(6):411–418, 2003.
A
A.1
Spherical harmonics and SO(3) invariants
Spherical harmonics
We follow the conventions of [BFB97]. Parametrize the unit sphere by angular spherical coordinates (θ, φ)
with θ ∈ [0, π] and φ ∈ [0, 2π). (Here θ = 0 is the north pole and θ = π is the south pole.) For integers ℓ ≥ 0
and −ℓ ≤ m ≤ ℓ, define the complex spherical harmonic
Yℓm (θ, φ) = (−1)m Nℓm Pℓm (cos θ)eimφ
with normalization factor
Nℓm =
s
(2ℓ + 1)(ℓ − m)!
4π(ℓ + m)!
where Pℓm (x) are the associated Legendre polynomials
Pℓm (x) =
1
2ℓ ℓ!
(1 − x2 )m/2
dℓ+m 2
(x − 1)ℓ .
dxℓ+m
In the S 2 registration problem we are interested in representing a real-valued function on the sphere, in
which case we use an expansion (with real coefficients) in terms of the real spherical harmonics:
(−1)m
√
m
m > 0,
√2 (Yℓm (θ, φ) + Yℓm (θ, φ)) = 2Nℓm Pℓ (cos θ) cos(mφ)
Yℓ0 (θ, φ) = Nℓ0 Pℓ0 (cos θ)
m = 0,
Sℓm (θ, φ) =
√
m
|m|
(−1)
√ (Yℓ|m| (θ, φ) − Yℓ|m| (θ, φ)) =
2Nℓ|m| Pℓ (cos θ) sin(|m|φ) m < 0.
i 2
37
Here Yℓm is the complex conjugate of Yℓm , which satisfies the identity
Yℓm (θ, φ) = (−1)m Yℓ(−m) (θ, φ).
(11)
−m
m
= (−1)m Nℓm Pℓm .
Above we have also used the identity Pℓ−m = (−1)m (ℓ−m)!
(ℓ+m)! Pℓ , which implies Nℓ(−m) Pℓ
In the cryo-EM problem we are instead interested in representing the Fourier transform of a real-valued
function. Such a function f has the property that if ~r and −~r are antipodal points on the sphere, f (−~r) =
f (~r). For this type of function we use an expansion (with real coefficients) in terms of a new basis of spherical
harmonics:
1
ℓ+m
Yℓ(−m) (θ, φ))
m > 0,
√2 (Yℓm (θ, φ) + (−1)
ℓ
i Yℓ0 (θ, φ)
m = 0,
Hℓm (θ, φ) =
√i (Yℓ|m| (θ, φ) − (−1)ℓ+m Yℓ(−|m|) (θ, φ)) m < 0.
2
One can check that Hℓm (−~r) = Hℓm (~r) using (11) along with the fact Yℓm (−~r) = (−1)ℓ Yℓm (~r) which comes
from Pℓm (−x) = (−1)ℓ+m Pℓm (x).
A.2
Wigner D-matrices
We will mostly work in the basis of complex spherical harmonics Yℓm since the formulas are simpler. The
analogous results for the other bases can be worked out by applying the appropriate change of basis.
Let Vℓ ≃ C2ℓ+1 be the vector space consisting of degree-ℓ complex spherical
harmonics represented
P
in the basis {Yℓm }−ℓ≤m≤ℓ , i.e. v ∈ C2ℓ+1 encodes the spherical harmonic ℓm=−ℓ vm Yℓm . These Vℓ (for
ℓ = 0, 1, 2, . . .) are the irreducible representations of SO(3). Each can also be defined over the real numbers
by changing basis to the real spherical harmonics Sℓm .
A group element g ∈ SO(3) acts on a (spherical harmonic) function f : S 2 → R via (g · f )(x) = f (g −1 x).
The action of g on Vℓ is given by the Wigner D-matrix Dℓ (g) ∈ C(2ℓ+1)×(2ℓ+1) defined as in [BFB97].
We will need the following orthogonality properties of the Wigner D-matrices. First, the standard Schur
orthogonality relations from representation theory yield
′
ℓ (g)D ℓ
Dmk
m′ k′ (g) =
E
g∼Haar(SO(3))
1
1ℓ=ℓ′ 1m=m′ 1k=k′ .
2ℓ + 1
We also have [Ros57]
ℓ
ℓ′
Dmk
(g)Dm
′ k′ (g)
=
′
ℓ+ℓ
X
L
hℓ m ℓ′ m′ |L (m + m′ )ihℓ k ℓ′ k ′ |L (k + k ′ )iD(m+m
′ )(k+k′ ) (g)
L=|ℓ−ℓ′ |
where hℓ1 m1 ℓ2 m2 |ℓ mi is a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient. There is a closed-form expression for these coefficients [Böh13]:
s
(2ℓ + 1)(ℓ + ℓ1 − ℓ2 )!(ℓ − ℓ1 + ℓ2 )!(ℓ1 + ℓ2 − ℓ)!
hℓ1 m1 ℓ2 m2 |ℓ mi =1m=m1 +m2
×
(ℓ1 + ℓ2 + ℓ + 1)!
p
(ℓ + m)!(ℓ − m)!(ℓ1 − m1 )!(ℓ1 + m1 )!(ℓ2 − m2 )!(ℓ2 + m2 )! ×
X
(−1)k
k
k!(ℓ1 + ℓ2 − ℓ − k)!(ℓ1 − m1 − k)!(ℓ2 + m2 − k)!(ℓ − ℓ2 + m1 + k)!(ℓ − ℓ1 − m2 + k)!
where the sum is over all k for which the argument of every factorial is nonnegative.
38
A.3
Moment tensor
Let F be a multi-set of frequencies from {1, 2, . . .} and consider the action of G = SO(3) on V = ⊕ℓ∈F Vℓ .
Recall that we want an explicit formula for Td (x) = Eg [(Π(g · x))⊗d ] with g ∼ Haar(G) (where Π can be the
identity in the case of no projection). We have
Eg [(Π(g · x))⊗d ] = Π⊗d Eg [ρ(g)⊗d ]x⊗d
(where x⊗d is a column vector of length dim(V )d ) and so we need an explicit formula for the matrix
Eg [ρ(g)⊗d ]. Here ρ(g) is block diagonal with blocks Dℓ (g) for ℓ ∈ F . There are no degree-1 invariants
since we have excluded the trivial representation ℓ = 0. For the degree-2 invariants Eg [ρ(g)⊗2 ], consider a
particular block Eg [Dℓ1 (g) ⊗ Dℓ2 (g)] for some pair (ℓ1 , ℓ2 ). The entries in this block can be computed using
0
the above orthogonality relations (and using D00
(g) = 1):
Eg [(Dℓ1 (g))m1 k1 (Dℓ2 (g))m2 k2 ] = 1ℓ1 =ℓ2 1m1 =−m2 1k1 =−k2 hℓ1 m1 ℓ2 m2 |0 0ihℓ1 k1 ℓ2 k2 |0 0i
= 1ℓ1 =ℓ2 1m1 =−m2 1k1 =−k2
(−1)m1 +k1
2ℓ1 + 1
ℓ1 +m1
√
using the special case hℓ1 m1 ℓ2 m2 |0 0i = 1ℓ1 =ℓ2 1m1 =−m2 (−1)
.
2ℓ1 +1
Similarly, for degree 3 we have
Eg [(Dℓ1 (g))m1 k1 (Dℓ2 (g))m2 k2 (Dℓ3 (g))m3 k3 ] =
1|ℓ2 −ℓ3 |≤ℓ1 ≤ℓ2 +ℓ3 1m1 +m2 +m3 =0 1k1 +k2 +k3 =0
A.4
(−1)m1 +k1
hℓ2 m2 ℓ3 m3 |ℓ1 (m2 + m3 )ihℓ2 k2 ℓ3 k3 |ℓ1 (k2 + k3 )i.
2ℓ1 + 1
Projection
Let V = ⊕ℓ∈F Vℓ with F a subset of {1, 2, . . .}. Let Π : V → W be the projection that takes a complex
spherical harmonic function and reveals only its values on the equator θ = π/2. In cryo-EM this projection
is applied separately to each shell (see Section 5.5). Letting L = maxℓ∈F ℓ, the functions b−L , b−L+1 , . . . , bL
(from the circle S 1 to R) form a basis for W , where bm (φ) = eimφ . The projection Π takes the form
Π(Yℓm ) = (−1)m Nℓm Pℓm (0)bm
extended by linearity. By taking a binomial expansion of (x2 − 1)ℓ it can be shown that
(
0
(ℓ + m) odd,
m
Pℓ (0) =
(−1)(ℓ−m)/2
ℓ
(ℓ+m)/2 (ℓ + m)! (ℓ + m) even.
2ℓ ℓ!
(12)
For cryo-EM, if we use the basis Hℓm so that the expansion coefficients are real, the output of the
projection can be expressed (with real coefficients) in the basis
1
imφ
+ (−1)m e−imφ )
m > 0,
√2 (e
1
m = 0,
hm (φ) =
√i (ei|m|φ − (−1)m e−i|m|φ ) m < 0,
2
where the projection Π takes the form
|m|
Π(Hℓm ) = (−1)m Nℓ|m| Pℓ
extended by linearity.
39
(0)hm
A.5
Explicit construction of invariants
Consider the cryo-EM setup (see Section 5.5) with S shells and F frequencies. We will cover S 2 registration as
the special case S = 1 (without projection). Use the basis of complex spherical harmonics, with corresponding
variables xsℓm with 1 ≤ s ≤ S, 1 ≤ ℓ ≤ F , and −ℓ ≤ m ≤ ℓ. One can change variables to Sℓm or Hℓm but
for our purposes of testing the rank of the Jacobian it is sufficient to just work with Yℓm (since the change
of variables has no effect on the rank of the Jacobian).
Recall that in Section A.3 we computed expressions for the matrices Eg [Dℓ1 (g)⊗ Dℓ2 (g)] and Eg [Dℓ1 (g)⊗
ℓ2
D (g) ⊗ Dℓ3 (g)], and in particular they are rank-1. Using this we can explicitly compute the entries of Td (x)
and thus extract a basis for U2T and U3T . We present the results below.
A.5.1
Degree-2 invariants
Without projection, the degree-2 invariants are
I2 (s1 , s2 , ℓ) =
X
1
(−1)k xs1 ℓk xs2 ℓ(−k)
2ℓ + 1
|k|≤ℓ
for s1 , s2 ∈ {1, . . . , S} and ℓ ∈ {1, . . . , F }. Swapping s1 with s2 results in the same invariant, so take s1 ≤ s2
to remove redundancies.
With projection, the degree-2 invariants are
X
Nℓm Nℓ(−m) Pℓm (0)Pℓ−m (0)I2 (s1 , s2 , ℓ)
P2 (s1 , s2 , m) = (−1)m
ℓ≥|m|
with s1 , s2 ∈ {1, . . . , S} and m ∈ {−F, . . . , F }. Negating m or swapping s1 with s2 results in the same
invariant (up to sign) so take s1 ≤ s2 and m ≥ 0 to remove redundancies. Recall the expression (12) for
Pℓm (0).
A.5.2
Degree-3 invariants
Let ∆(ℓ1 , ℓ2 , ℓ3 ) denote the predicate |ℓ2 − ℓ3 | ≤ ℓ1 ≤ ℓ2 + ℓ3 (which captures whether ℓ1 , ℓ2 , ℓ3 can be the
side-lengths of a triangle). Without projection, the degree-3 invariants are
I3 (s1 , ℓ1 , s2 , ℓ2 , s3 , ℓ3 ) =
1
2ℓ1 + 1
X
(−1)k1 hℓ2 k2 ℓ3 k3 |ℓ1 (−k1 )ixs1 ℓ1 k1 xs2 ℓ2 k2 xs3 ℓ3 k3
k1 +k2 +k3 =0
|ki |≤ℓi
for si ∈ {1, . . . , S} and ℓi ∈ {1, . . . , F } satisfying ∆(ℓ1 , ℓ2 , ℓ3 ). There are some redundancies here. First,
permuting the three (si , ℓi ) pairs (while keeping each pair in tact) results in the same invariant (up to scalar
multiple). Also, some of the above invariants are actually zero; specifically, this occurs when (s1 , ℓ1 ) =
(s2 , ℓ2 ) = (s3 , ℓ3 ) with ℓ1 odd, or when (s1 , ℓ1 ) = (s2 , ℓ2 ) 6= (s3 , ℓ3 ) with ℓ3 odd (or some permutation of this
case).
With projection, the degree-3 invariants are
P3 (s1 , m1 , s2 , m2 , s3 , m3 ) =
X
1
2
3
(0)Pℓm
(0)Pℓm
(0)hℓ2 m2 ℓ3 m3 |ℓ1 (−m1 )iI3 (s1 , ℓ1 , s2 , ℓ2 , s3 , ℓ3 )
Nℓ1 m1 Nℓ2 m2 Nℓ3 m3 Pℓm
(−1)m1
1
2
3
ℓ1 ,ℓ2 ,ℓ3 : ∆(ℓ1 ,ℓ2 ,ℓ3 )
for si ∈ {1, . . . , S} and mi ∈ {−F, . . . , F } such that m1 + m2 + m3 = 0. There are again redundancies under
permutation: permuting the three (si , mi ) pairs results in the same invariant. Negating all three m’s also
results in the same invariant. There are additional non-trivial linear relations (see Section A.6 below).
40
A.6
A.6.1
Counting the number of invariants
S 2 registration
For the case of S 2 registration (S = 1) the above degree-2 and degree-3 invariants without projection (with
G
redundancies removed as discussed above) form a basis for R[x]G
2 ⊕ R[x]3 (although we have not made this
rigorous). Thus, counting these invariants gives a combinatorial analogue of Proposition 5.7.
A.6.2
Cryo-EM
T
In this section we give a formula for trdeg(U≤3
) for (heterogeneous) cryo-EM (with projection), valid for all
K ≥ 1, S ≥ 1 and F ≥ 2. The formula is conjectural but has been tested (via the Jacobian criterion) for
various small values of K, S, F .
The number of algebraically independent degree-2 invariants turns out to be the number of distinct I2
invariants (i.e. without projection), since the projected invariants P2 are linear combinations of these. The
number of such invariants is 21 S(S + 1)F .
For degree 3, things are more complicated because the projected invariants P3 have smaller dimension
than the I3 . We start by counting the number of distinct (up to scalar multiple) P3 invariants. To this
end, let X (S, F ) be the set of equivalence classes of tuples (s1 , m1 , s2 , m2 , s3 , m3 ) with si ∈ {1, . . . , S} and
mi ∈ {−F, . . . , F }, modulo the relations
(s1 , m1 , s2 , m2 , s3 , m3 ) ∼ (s2 , m2 , s1 , m1 , s3 , m3 ) ∼ (s1 , m1 , s3 , m3 , s2 , m2 )
(s1 , m1 , s2 , m2 , s3 , m3 ) ∼ (s1 , −m1 , s2 , −m2 , s3 , −m3 )
(permutation)
(negation).
There are some non-trivial linear relations among the distinct P3 invariants, which we must now account
for. The number of such relations is
E(S) := 2S + 4S(S − 1) + S(S − 1)(S − 2).
This can be broken down as follows. For each k ∈ {1, 2, 3} there are 2k relations for each size-3 multisubset {s1 , s2 , s3 } of {1, . . . , S} with exactly k distinct elements. (We do not currently have a thorough
understanding of what exactly the linear relations are, but we have observed that the above pattern holds.)
We can now put it all together and state our conjecture. We will also use the formula (3) for trdeg(R[x]G ),
extended to the heterogeneous case via Proposition 4.15.
Conjecture A.1. Consider cryo-EM with F ≥ 2 frequencies.
• trdeg(R[x]G ) = K[S(F 2 + 2F ) − 3] + K − 1,
• dim(U2T ) = 12 S(S + 1)F ,
• dim(U3T ) = |X (S, F )| − E(S),
• generic list recovery is possible at degree 3 if and only if dim(U2T ) + dim(U3T ) ≥ trdeg(R[x]G ).
When S and F are large, the dominant term in dim(U2T ) + dim(U3T ) is |X (S, F )| ≈ S 3 F 2 /4 and so generic
list recovery is possible when (roughly) K ≤ S 2 /4.
B
Unique recovery for the regular representation
Let G be a finite abelian group. Let V be the regular representation of G over R, i.e. V = R|G| with
basis indexed by the elements of G, and the action of G permutes the basis elements vg according to group
multiplication: h · vg = vhg . Note that for the cyclic group G = Z/p, this is precisely the MRA problem. We
will show that with this setup, generic unique recovery is possible at degree 3:
41
Theorem B.1. Let G be a finite abelian group and let V be the regular representation of G over R. Then
T
R(U≤3
) is equal to the field of fractions of R[x]G .
Recall that the equality of the two fields above implies generic unique recovery at degree 3 by Corollary 4.25.
Generic unique recovery at degree 3 is actually true in the more general setting where V is the regular
representation over R of any finite group [Kak09].
T
Proof. It is sufficient to show C(U≤3
) = C(R[x]G ). Let p = |G| = dim(V ). The polynomial algebra on V
gets an action of G in the usual way and the degree-1 component is isomorphic to the regular representation.
Over C, the regular representation decomposes as a direct sum of all the characters χ(1) , . . . , χ(p) of G
(each of which is a group homomorphism G → C× = C r {0}). (Here we have used the fact that G is finite
and abelian, and so its irreducible representations are 1-dimensional.)
b = {χ(1) , . . . , χ(p) } be the set of characters. For each χ ∈ G
b let yχ ∈ C[V ] be the associated
Let G
eigenvector (in the degree-1 component of the polynomial algebra) so that g · yχ = χ(g)yχ for all g ∈ G.
b forms an abelian group (the character group or Pontryagin dual of G) under pointwise multiplication:
G
(χ1 χ2 )(g) = χ1 (g)χ2 (g).
b yχ yχ−1 is a degree-2 invariant, and for any χ1 , χ2 ∈ G,
b yχ1 yχ2 y(χ χ )−1 is a
Observe that for any χ ∈ G,
1 2
b we have
degree-3 invariant. For each χ ∈ G
Y
Y
yχ′ yχ′−1 =
yχp
yχ yχ′ y(χχ′ )−1
b
χ′ ∈G
b
χ′ ∈G
and so yχp lies in the field generated by the invariants of degree ≤ 3.
The field extension C(yχ(1) , . . . , yχ(p) )/C(yχp (1) , . . . , yχp (p) ) is Galois with Galois group H = (Z/p)p ; the
generator of the ith copy of Z/p acts by multiplying yχ(i) by a fixed primitive pth root of unity. (Recall that
the Galois group is the automorphisms of the larger field that fix the smaller field pointwise.)
By the fundamental theorem of Galois theory, intermediate extensions of the above Galois extension are
in bijection with subgroups of H. The correspondence maps a field to the group that fixes it (pointwise) and
maps a group to the field that it fixes. The field C(R[x]G ) is an intermediate extension with corresponding
T
group G. The field C(U≤3
) is also an intermediate extension, and we will show that its corresponding group
T
is also G, thus proving C(U≤3
) = C(R[x]G ) as desired.
T
T
Clearly G fixes C(U≤3 ) (since U≤3
are invariants), so it remains to show that there are no other automorT
phisms of C(yχ(1) , . . . , yχ(p) ) that fix U≤3
. Let φ ∈ H. As an element of (Z/p)p , we can write φ = (φ1 , . . . , φp ).
If χ = χ(i) we will also write φχ for φi . If φ fixes the degree-2 invariant yχ yχ−1 , we must have φχ−1 = φ−1
χ . If
.
In
particular,
=
φ
φ also fixes the degree-3 invariant yχ1 yχ2 y(χ1 χ2 )−1 , we must have φχ1 φχ2 = φ−1
χ
χ
−1
1 2
(χ1 χ2 )
b → C× given by χ 7→ φχ is a group homomorphism. Thus, any φ fixing U T can be identified
the map G
≤3
b
b , which is isomorphic to G; in particular there are only p
with an element of the Pontryagin double dual G
such elements φ, which completes the proof.
42
| 8cs.DS
|
arXiv:1711.03912v1 [math.GN] 10 Nov 2017
Zariski-like Topologies for Lattices with Applications
to Modules over Commutative Rings *
Jawad Abuhlail†
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
31261 Dhahran, KSA
Hamza Hroub‡
Department of Mathematics
King Saud University
11451 Riyadh, KSA
November 13, 2017
Abstract
We study Zariski-like topologies on a proper class X & L of a complete lattice L =
(L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1). We consider X with the so called classical Zariski topology (X , τ cl ) and study
its topological properties (e.g. the separation axioms, the connectedness, the compactness)
and provide sufficient conditions for it to be spectral. We say that L is X -top iff
τ := {X \V (a) | a ∈ L}, where V (a) = {x ∈ L | a ≤ x}
is a topology. We study the interplay between the algebraic properties of an X -top complete lattice L and the topological properties of (X , τ cl ) = (X , τ ). Our results are applied to
several spectra which are proper classes of L := LAT (R M) where M is a left module over
an arbitrary associative ring R (e.g. the spectra of prime, coprime, fully prime submodules)
of M as well as to several spectra of the dual complete lattice L 0 (e.g. the spectra of first,
second and fully coprime submodules of M).
* MSC2010:
Primary 06A15; Secondary 16D10, 13C05, 13C13, 54B99.
Key Words: Topological lattices; Prime Modules, First Submodules, Strongly Hollow Submodules, Zariski Topology, Dual Zariski Topology, Zariski Topology; Dual Zariski Topology
† Corresponding Author; Email: [email protected].
The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King
Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) for funding this work through projects No. RG1213-1 &
RG1213-2
‡ The paper is extracted from the Ph.D. dissertation of Dr. Hamza Hroub under the supervision of Prof. Jawad
Abuhlail
1
Introduction
The spectrum Spec(R) of prime ideals of a commutative ring R attains the so called Zariski
topology in which the closed sets are the varieties
{V (I) | I ∈ Ideal(R)}, where V (I) = {P ∈ Spec(R) | I ⊆ P}.
This topology is compact, T0 but almost never T2 , and the closed points correspond to the maximal ideals. The Zariski topology proved to be very important in two main aspects: in Algebraic
Geometry and in Commutative Algebra. In particular, it provided an efficient tool for studying
the algebraic properties of a commutative ring R by investigating the corresponding topological
properties of Spec(R) [9].
Motivated by this, there were many attempts to define Zariski-like topologies on the spectra
of prime-like submodules of a given left module M over a (not necessarily commutative) ring
R. This resulted at the first place in several different notions of prime submodules of R M which
reduced to the notion of a prime ideal for the special case M = R, a commutative ring (e.g. [21]).
The work in this direction was almost limited to studying these prime-like submodules and their
duals (the coprime-like submodules) as well as to the families of prime ideals corresponding to
them from a purely algebraic point of view. One of the obstacles was that not every module
M over a (commutative) ring R has the property that Spec(M) attains a Zariski-like topology:
the proposed closed varieties {V (N) | N ∈ LAT (R M)} are not necessarily closed under finite
unions. Modules for which this last condition is satisfied were investigated, among others, by
R. L. McCasland and P. F. Smith (e.g. [17], [16]) and called top modules. However, even
such modules were studied from a purely algebraic point of view and the associated Zariski-like
topologies were not well studied till about a decade ago. In [6], Abuhlail introduced a Zariskilike topology on the spectrum of fully coprime subcomodules of a given comodule M of a coring
C over an associative ring R and studied the interplay between the algebraic properties of M and
the topological properties of that Zariski-like topology (see also [5]).
Later, in a series of papers ([3], [4], [2]), Abuhlail introduced and investigated several Zariskilike topologies for a module M over an arbitrary associative ring R. These investigations showed
that all the (co)prime spectra considered fall in two main classes with several common properties
for the spectra in each class. Moreover, these two classes were dual to each other in some sense.
This led Abuhlail and Lomp ([7], [1]) to investigate such topologies for a general complete lattice
L := (L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1) and a proper subset X ⊆ L\{1}. Their main work was on characterizing the
so called X -top lattices (i.e. L for which the closed varieties V (a) := {x ∈ X | a ≤ x} are closed
under finite unions). In addition to the fact that this approach provided a general framework, it
allowed obtaining results on the dual lattice L 0 := (L, ∧0 , ∨0 , 00 , 10 ) = (L, ∨, ∧, 1, 0) and X ⊆
L\{0} for free.
This paper consists of two sections. After providing some basic definitions and preliminaries,
we study in Section 1 Zariski-like topologies for complete lattices using a different approach. Fix
a complete lattice L = (L, ∨, ∧, 1, 0), a subset X ⊆ L\{1} and τ := {X \V (a) | a ∈ L}. Inspired
by the work of Behboodi and Haddadi [10], [11] on the lattice LAT (R M) of submodules of a
given module M over a ring R, and instead of restricting our attention to X -top lattices (i.e. those
for which (X , τ ) is a topology), we consider X with the classical Zariski topology (X , τ cl ) which
2
is constructed on X by considering τ as a subbase and the finer patch topology (X , τ fp ) which
has a subbase B := {V (a) ∩ X \V (b) | a, b ∈ L}. Indeed, (X , τ cl ) ≤ (X , τ fp ) and (X , τ ) = (X , τ cl )
if and only if L is X -top. In the special case when L is an X -top lattice, we not only apply the
results obtained on (X , τ cl ), but obtain also other interesting results especially on the interplay
between the algebraic properties of L and the topological properties of (X , τ ).
In Proposition 1.22, we prove a stronger version of the converse of [1, Proposition 2.7] and
conclude in Corollary 1.23 that in case L is an X -top lattice: A ⊆ X is irreducible if and only if
V
I(A) :=
x is (strongly) irreducible in the sublattice (C (L), ∧) of radical elements of L . This
x∈A
fact was the key in the proofs of several results including Theorem 2.6. It is worth mentioning that
Theorem 2.6 recovers several results of Abuhlail on such 1-1 correspondences for L = LAT (R M)
(e.g. [2], [3], [4]) and Abuhlail/Lomp [1] as special cases (some of these results are recovered
under conditions weaker than those assumed in the original results for the different spectra of
modules).
In Theorem 1.27, we prove that the class Max(X ) of maximal elements of X coincides with
the class of Max(C (L )) of maximal radical elements. This yields, assuming that C (L ) satisfies
the so called complete max property, that (X , τ cl ) is discrete if and only if (X , τ cl ) is T1 . This
result generalizes [2, Theorem 5.34], [2, Theorem 4.28] and [3, Theorem 3.46].
A topological space T is said to be spectral [15] iff T is homeomorphic to Spec(R), the
prime spectrum of a commutative ring R, with the Zariski topology. Hochster [15] characterized
such spaces by giving sufficient and necessary conditions on a topological space to be spectral.
We observe in Proposition 1.49 that if the finer patch topology (X , τ fp ) is compact, then the
classical Zariski topology (X , τ cl ) is spectral. Sufficient conditions for (X , τ fp ) to be compact
were provided in Theorems 1.54 and 1.58. Example 1.64 provides several spectra of modules
which are shown to be spectral by Theorem 1.54.
In Section 2, we restrict our investigations to X -top lattices L = (L, ∨, ∧, 1, 0) where X ⊆
L\{1}. We investigate the interplay between the algebraic properties of L and the topological
space (X , τ ) = (X , τ cl ). Several types of compactness and connectedness of (X , τ ) are studied in
Theorem 2.3. For examples of such an interplay.
The results in Section 1 are applied to the complete lattice LAT (R M) := (L (M), ∩, +, 0, M)
of submodules of a left module M over an associative ring R. In a series of examples 2.9 - 2.14,
we apply Theorem 2.6 to a number of spectra X ⊆ L (M)\M (or X ⊆ L (M)\{0}).
1 Zariski-like Topologies for Lattices
Lattices
1.1. ([14]) A lattice L is a poset (L, ≤) closed under two binary commutative associative and
idempotent operations ∧ (meet) and ∨ (join), and we write L = (L, ∧, ∨). We say that a lattice
V
W
(L, ∧, ∨) is a complete lattice iff
x and
x exist for any H ⊆ L. For two lattices L =
x∈H
x∈H
(L, ∧, ∨) and L ′ = (L′ , ∧′ , ∨′ ), a homomorphism of lattices from L to L ′ is a map ϕ : L −→ L′
3
that preserves finite meets and finite joins, i.e.
ϕ (x ∧ y) = ϕ (x) ∧′ ϕ (y) and ϕ (x ∨ y) = ϕ (x) ∨′ ϕ (y) ∀x, y ∈ L.
If L = (L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1) and L ′ = (L′ , ∧′ , ∨′ , 0′ , 1′ ) are complete lattices, then a morphism of complete lattices from L to L ′ is a map ϕ : L −→ L′ that preserves arbitrary meets and arbitrary
joins.
1.2. Let L = (L, ∧, ∨) be a lattice. If L has a maximum element 1 and a minimum element 0,
then L is called a bounded lattice and we write L = (L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1). An element x ∈ L\{1} is
called maximal in L iff y = x or y = 1 whenever x ≤ y; dually, an element x ∈ L\{0} is called
minimal iff y = x or y = 0 whenever y ≤ x. Notice that every complete lattice is bounded. We
V
W
x = 0.
make the convention that
x = 1 and
x∈0/
x∈0/
1.3. For every lattice L = (L, ∧, ∨), there is associated the dual lattice L 0 = (L, ∧0 , ∨0 ) where
∧0 = ∨ and ∨0 = ∧. Indeed, if L = (L, ∧, ∨) is a complete lattice, then the dual lattice L 0
is complete. Moreover, if L = (L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1) is a bounded lattice, then the dual lattice L 0 =
(L, ∧0 , ∨0 , 00 , 10 ) is bounded with 00 = 1 and 10 = 0.
Example 1.4. Let R be a ring.
1. S = (Ideal(R), ∩, +, R, 0), where Ideal(R) is the set of all (two-sided) ideals of R is a
complete lattice.
2. For any left R-module M, the set LAT (M) = (L (M), ∩, +, M, 0) is a complete lattice where
L (M) is the class of all R-submodules of M.
1.5. Let L = (L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1) be a complete lattice.
1. An element x ∈ L\{1} is said to be:
irreducible [7] iff for any a, b ∈ L with a ∧ b = x, we have a = x or b = x;
strongly irreducible [7] iff for any a, b ∈ L with a ∧ b ≤ x, we have a ≤ x or b ≤ x.
We denote the set of strongly irreducible elements in L by SI(L ).
2. An element x ∈ L\{0} is said to be:
hollow iff whenever for any a, b ∈ L with x = a ∨ b, we have x = a or x = b;
strongly hollow [7] iff for any a, b ∈ L with x ≤ a ∨ b, we have x ≤ a or x ≤ b.
We denote the set of strongly hollow elements in L by SH(L ).
3. We say that L is
a hollow lattice iff 1 is hollow (i.e. for any two elements x, y ∈ L\{1} we have x ∨ y 6= 1);
a uniform lattice iff 0 is uniform (i.e. for any two elements x, y ∈ L\{0} we have x ∧ y 6= 0).
4
1.1 X-top Lattices
From now on, we assume that L = (L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1) is a complete lattice.
1.6. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. For a ∈ L, we define the variety of a as V (a) := {p ∈ X | a ≤ p} and
set V (L ) := {V (a) | a ∈ L}. Indeed, V (L ) is closed under arbitrary intersections (in fact,
T
W
a∈A V (a) = V ( a∈A (a)) for any A ⊆ L). The lattice L is called X -top (or a topological lattice
[1]) iff V (L ) is closed under finite unions. The lattice L is called strongly X -top iff X ⊆ SI(L )
[1].
√
V
1.7. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. For any Y ⊆ X , we set I(Y ) :=
p and a := I(V (a)). We say that a is
p∈Y
√
an X -radical element iff a = a. The set of X -radical elements of L is
√
C X (L) := {a ∈ L | a = a}.
When X is clear
from the above notation. Notice that C (L ) =
√ from the context, we drop it W̃
W
W̃
˜ 0, 1) is a complete lattice, where Y := IV ( (Y )) for any Y ⊆ C (L), i.e. x∈Y x =
(C
(L),
∧,
∨,
qW
x. It was proved in [1, Theorem 2.2] that L is an X -top lattice if and only if the map
x∈Y
√
˜ 1, 0) −→ (P(X ), ∩, ∪, X , 0),
V : (C (L), ∧, ∨,
/ a 7→ V (a)
is an anti-homomorphism of lattices, that is
V (a ∧ b) = V (a) ∪V (b) and V (a ∨ b) = V (a) ∩V (b) for all a, b ∈ C (L).
The following lemma appeared in [1] except for (2) which is clear.
Lemma 1.8. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. For any x, y ∈ L and A, B ⊆ L we have:
1. A ⊆ B ⇒ I(B) ≤ I(A).
√
√
√
√
2. V (x) ⊆ V (y) ⇔ y ≤ x. It follows that V (x) = V (y) ⇔ y = x.
√
3. V (x) = V ( x).
4.
T
V (x) = V (
x∈A
W
(x)).
x∈A
5. I ◦V ◦ I = I.
6. V ◦ I ◦V = V .
7. L is X -top ⇐⇒ V (x) ∪V (y) = V (x ∧ y) for any x, y ∈ C (L).
1.9. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and set τ := {X \V (a) | a ∈ L}. We define τ cl to be the topology constructed
on X by taking τ as a subbase, that is τ cl is the set of all arbitrary unions of finite intersections
of elements in τ , and is called the classical Zariski topology on X . Moreover, L is X -top (i.e. τ
is closed under finite intersections) if and only if τ cl = τ .
5
1.10. Let Y ⊆ L\{0}. For any a ∈ L, we define the dual variety V 0 (a) := {q ∈ Y | q ≤ a}
and set V 0 (L ) = {V 0 (a) | a ∈ L}. We say that L is dual Y -top iff the dual lattice L 0 is a
√ 0
W
Y -top lattice. For any subset A ⊆ Y , we set H(A) := q∈A q; also we set a := H(V 0 (a)),
and H (L ) = C Y (L 0 ). The dual classical Zariski topology τ dcl on Y is constructed by taking
τ 0 := {Y \V 0 (a) | a ∈ L} as a subbase for this topology. With this process, one can dualize the
results obtained in this section for the (classical) Zariski-topology to results on the dual (classical)
Zariski topology.
The following lemma recovers [2, 5.14 and 4.10], [3, 3.23] and [4, 3.21].
Lemma 1.11. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that L is an X -top lattice. The closure of any Y ⊆ X
is given by Y = V (I(Y )).
Proof. Let Y ⊆ X . Notice that Y = V (a) for some a ∈ L, whence a ≤
V
p = I(Y ) and so
p∈Y
V (I(Y )) ⊆ V (a) = Y . On the other hand, Y ⊆ V (I(Y )) and so Y ⊆ V (I(Y )).
1.12. A non-empty topological space (T, τ ) is said to be:
1. connected iff T is not the union of two disjoint non-empty open subsets (equivalently, T is
not the union of two disjoint non-empty closed sets).
2. hyperconnected (or irreducible [12]) iff no two non-empty open sets in T are disjoint
(equivalently, T is not the union of two closed subsets).
3. ultraconnected [12] iff no two non-empty closed sets in T are disjoint.
1.13. Let (T, τ ) be a topological space. A subset A ⊆ T is called hyperconnected [12] (or irreducible) iff A is so when considered as a topological space w.r.t. the relative topology induced from (T, τ ) (equivalently, A is non-empty and for any two closed subsets F1 , F2 in T with
A ⊆ F1 ∪ F2 , we have A ⊆ F1 or A ⊆ F2 ). The empty set is not considered to be irreducible. A
closed subset F ⊆ T is said to have a generic point g ∈ T [12] iff {g} = F. The topological space
(T, τ ) is called sober iff every closed irreducible subset of T has a unique generic point.
1.14. A subset A ⊆ T is irreducible if and only if the closure A is irreducible. An irreducible
component [12] is an irreducible subset of X which is not a proper subset of any irreducible
subset of T (hence an irreducible component of T is indeed a closed subset).
The following result generalizes [10, 3.2 and 3.3].
Proposition 1.15. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ).
1. For each p ∈ X , we have {p} = V (p).
2. V (p) is irreducible ∀p ∈ X .
6
3. If Y ⊆ X is closed, then Y =
S
V (p).
p∈Y
4. If L is X -top, then for any closed subset Y ⊆ X we have Y =
S
V (p) = V (
p∈Y
V
p).
p∈Y
Proof. Consider (X , τ cl ).
1. Observe that V (p) is closed in (X , τ cl ), whence {p} ⊆ V (p). On the other hand, suppose
T
S j=n
S j=n
that {p} = i∈I ( j=1i (V (xi j ))), where xi j ∈ L. Since p ∈ j=1i (V (xi j )) ∀i ∈ I, it follows
S j=ni
that V (p) ⊆
{p} = V (p).
j=1
(V (xi j )) ∀i ∈ I. Therefore, V (p) ⊆ {p}. Clearly, {p} ⊆ V (p), whence
2. Notice that {p} is irreducible, whence V (p) = {p} is irreducible.
3. Clear.
4. Let Y ⊆ X be closed. It follows from (3) that Y =
S
p∈Y
to be X -top, Y = V (x) for some x ∈ L and so x ≤
Consequently, Y =
S
p∈Y
V (p) = V (
V
V (p) ⊆ V (
V
p∈Y
V
p). Since L is assumed
p∈Y
p, whence V (
V
p∈Y
p) ⊆ V (x) = Y .
p).
p∈Y
Example 1.16. Consider the complete ideal lattice L = (Ideal(Z), ∩, +, Z, 0). Consider X =
Spec p (Z), the prime spectrum of Z. It is clear that (X , τ ) is a topological space (the usual Zariski
topology on the spectrum of the commutative ring Z). Notice that for Y := Spec p (Z)\{0}, we
T
S
have Y = V (I(Y )) = V (
P) = V (0) = X 6=
V (p). This example shows that [10, Proposition
P∈Y
p∈Y
3.1] fails to hold even for domains. However, the proof of Proposition 1.15 provides a correct
proof [10, Corollary 2.3] without using [10, Proposition 3.1].
The following result recovers [10, Proposition 3.8], [3, Proposition 3.24 (1)] and [2, Proposition 5.15 (i)].
Proposition 1.17. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ).
1. X is T0 .
2. Every finite closed irreducible subset of X has a unique generic point. If X is finite, then X
is sober.
Proof.
1. Let p1 , p2 ∈ X be such that {p1 } = {p2 }, whence V (p1 ) = V (p2 ) and it follows
that p1 = p2 , which proves that X is T0 (notice that, in general, (X , τ ) is T0 if and only if
{p1 } = {p2 } ⇔ p1 = p2 ).
7
2. In general, If (X , τ ) is T0 , then every finite irreducible closed subset has a unique generic
point. To see this, suppose that F is a closed irreducible finite set that has no generic point.
6 F and so there is x2 ∈ F\{x1 }. Observe that {x1 } ∪ {x2 } =
6 F
Pick x1 ∈ F, whence {x1 } =
as F is irreducible. So, there is x3 ∈ F\({x1 } ∪ {x2 }). by continuing this process, we
conclude that F is infinite, a contradiction. The uniqueness of the generic point follows
directly from the fact that T0 .
The following observation generalizes [10, Proposition 2.3].
Remark 1.18. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. The following are equivalent for (X , τ cl ) :
1. L = C (L ).
2. For all x1 , x2 ∈ L with V (x1 ) = V (x2 ), we have x1 = x2 .
Proof. (1 ⇒ 2) Suppose V (x1 ) = V (x2 ) for some x1 , x2 ∈ L. It follows that x1 ≤ p, ∀p ∈ V (x2 )
√
whence x1 ≤ x2 = x2 . Similarly, x2 ≤√x1 .
√
(2 ⇒ 1) ∀x ∈ L we have V (x) = V ( x), whence x = x.
1.19. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and denote by Min(X ) the set of minimal elements of X and by Max(X )
the set of maximal elements of X . We say that X is
atomic iff for every p ∈ X there is q ∈ Min(X ) such that q ≤ p;
coatomic iff for every element p ∈ X there is q ∈ Max(X ) such that p ≤ q.
Remarks 1.20. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ).
1. If X satisfies the DCC, then X is atomic.
2. If X is atomic, then there is a subset A ⊆ X such that X = p∈A V (p) with V (p) and V (q)
are not comparable for any p 6= q ∈ A (e.g. take A = Min(X )).
S
3. Let X be atomic and Min(X ) finite. Then X is irreducible if and only if Min(X ) is a
S
singleton. To see this, observe that X =
V (p) with p q for any p 6= q are in
p∈Min(X)
Min(X ). Clearly, X is irreducible if and only if Min(X ) is a singleton.
Remarks 1.21. Let X ⊆ L\{1} with 0 ∈ X and consider (X , τ cl ).
1. If F ⊆ X is closed and 0 ∈ F, then F = X . To prove this, observe that X = V (0) = {0} ⊆ F.
2. Every non-empty open subset of X contains 0. To see this, let O ⊆ X be open. If 0 ∈
/ O,
then 0 ∈ F := X \O. By (1), X \O = X , i.e. O = 0.
/
3. X is irreducible since Min(X ) = {0}, a singleton (see Remark 1.20 (3)).
8
It was proved in [1, Proposition 2.7], that if L is an X -top lattice and A ⊆ X is such that I(A) is
irreducible in (C (L), ∧), then A is irreducible in (X , τ ). The following result proves a stronger
version of the converse.
Proposition 1.22. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that L is an X -top lattice. If A ⊆ X is irreducible,
then I(A) is strongly irreducible in (C (L), ∧).
[1, Theorem 2.2]
=
Proof. Suppose that a∧b ≤ I(A) for some a, b ∈ C (L). Now, A = V (I(A)) ⊆ V (a∧b)
V (a) ∪ V (b). Since A is irreducible, A is also irreducible, whence A ⊆ V (a) or A ⊆ V (b). So,
a = I(V (a)) ≤ I(A) = I(V (I(A))) = I(A) or b = I(V (b)) ≤ I(A) = I(V (I(A))) = I(A).
Corollary 1.23. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that L is an X -top lattice. The following conditions
are equivalent for A ⊆ X :
1. A is irreducible;
2. I(A) is strongly irreducible in (C (L), ∧);
3. I(A) is irreducible in (C (L), ∧).
1.24. A maximal element in L is a maximal element in the poset (L\{1}, ≤). An element x ∈ L
is called minimal in L iff x is maximal in L 0 . We denote by Max(L ) (resp. Min(L )) the set
of all maximal (resp. minimal) elements in L . The lattice L is called coatomic iff for every
element x ∈ L\{1}, there exists y ∈ Max(L ) such that x ≤ y. Dually, L is called atomic iff for
every element x ∈ L\{0}, there exists y ∈ Min(L ) such that y ≤ x.
V
Let A ⊆ L. The lattice L is said to have the complete A-property iff
p q for any
p∈A\{q}
q ∈ A. The lattice L is said to have the complete max property iff L has the complete Max(L )property.
Lemma 1.25. Let L be an X -top lattice. If L is coatomic and Max(L ) ⊆ X , then Max(L ) =
Max(X ).
Proof. Let p ∈ Max(X ). Since L is coatomic, there is y ∈ Max(L ) such that p ≤ y and so p = y
as Max(L ) ⊆ X .
The following result recovers and generalizes [3, Proposition 3.45], [2, Propositions 5.33,
4.27], and [4, Proposition 3.40]. The additional conditions assumed in these results imply that
Max(L ) = Max(X ) (or Min(L ) = Min(X ) in the dual cases).
Proposition 1.26. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. The following are equivalent for (X , τ cl ) :
1. X is T1 ;
9
2. Max(X ) = X = Min(X ).
Proof. X is T1 ⇔ every singleton is closed ⇔ {p} = {p} = V (p) ∀p ∈ X ⇔ Max(X ) = X =
Min(X ).
Theorem 1.27. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ). Then Max(X ) = Max(C (L )). Moreover,
the following conditions are equivalent:
1. X is T1 and C (L ) satisfies the complete max property;
2. X is discrete.
Proof. Let p ∈ Max(X ). Then p ∈ C (L) and so p ∈ Max(C (L )); otherwise, there is x ∈
C (L)\{1} such that p x. Since x 6= 1, there is q ∈ X such that x ≤ q and so p q (a contradicV
tion). For the reverse inclusion, let x ∈ Max(C (L)). Notice that x =
p for some 0/ 6= A ⊆ X .
Vp∈A
Since A ⊆ C (L), it follows by the maximality of x in C (L) that x = p∈A p = q for some q ∈ A,
i.e. A is singleton and x ∈ X . Moreover, x ∈ Max(X ) as X ⊆ C (L).
(1) ⇒ (2) : Assume that C (L ) satisfies the complete max property. Since Max(X ) =
V
Max(C (L)), we have
p q for any q ∈ Max(X ). Notice that for any q ∈ X , we
p∈Max(X)\{q}
have X = V (
V
p∈X\{q}
p) ∪ {q} and by our assumption q ∈
/ V(
V
p). Hence, every singleton in
p∈X\{q}
X is open, that is (X , τ cl ) is discrete.
(2) ⇒ (1) : Assume that X is discrete and show that C (L ) satisfies the complete max property. To show this, suppose that q ∈ X and let Y = X \{q}. Observe that
Y = Y = V (I(Y ))
as {q} is open. Hence, I(Y ) q, which completes the proof as X = Max(X ) = Max(C (L )).
The following result generalizes [2, Theorem 5.34], [2, Theorem 4.28] and [3, Theorem
3.46].
Corollary 1.28. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ). If C (L ) satisfies the complete max property, then the following conditions are equivalent:
1. Max(X ) = X = Min(X );
2. X is T2 ;
3. X is T1 ;
10
4. X is discrete.
Corollary 1.29. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ). Assume that L satisfies the complete max
property, L is coatomic and Max(L ) ⊆ C (L). The following are equivalent:
1. Max(X ) = X = Min(X );
2. X is T2 ;
3. X is T1 ;
4. X is discrete.
Proof. Let p ∈ Max(C (L )). Since L is coatomic, there exists q ∈ Max(L ) such that p ≤ q.
By assumption, Max(L ) ⊆ C (L) whence p = q. So, Max(L ) = Max(C (L )) and the result
follows by Corollary Theorem 3.16.
A topological space is regular [18] iff any non-empty closed set F and any point x that does
not belong to F can be separated by disjoint open neighborhoods. A T3 space is one which is both
T1 and regular. In general, regular spaces need not be Hausdorff. However, we have a special
situation.
Remark 1.30. If (X , τ cl ) is regular, then (X , τ cl ) is T3 . To see this, assume that X is regular and let
p 6= q be elements in X . Assume, without loss of generality, that p q so that is, q ∈
/ V (p). Since
X is regular, there are two disjoint open sets O1 and O2 in X such that q ∈ O1 and V (p) ⊆ O2 .
Therefore, X is T2 .
A topological space X is normal [18] iff any two disjoint closed sets of X can be separated by
disjoint open neighborhoods. The following example shows that the normality of (X , τ cl ) does
not guarantee that it is regular.
Example 1.31. Let R be a local ring with |Spec(R)| ≥ 2. Then Spec(R) is normal because it has
no disjoint non-empty closed sets. However, Spec(R) is not T1 whence not regular by Remark
1.30. To see this, notice that the assumption |Spec(R)| ≥ 2 implies that there is a prime ideal p
of R and a maximal ideal q of R such that p q. Hence, every open set containing q contains p
as well.
1.2 Examples
Through the rest of this section, R is an associative ring, M is a non-zero left R-module and
LAT (M) := (L (M), ∩, +, M, 0) the complete lattice of R-submodules of M. Moreover, we denote by Max(M) (resp. S (M)) the possibly empty set of maximal (resp. simple) R-submodules
of M. By L ≤ M, we mean that L is an R-submodule of M. With abuse of notation, we mean by
I ≤ R that I is a (two sided) ideal of R.
11
1.32. Let M be a left R-module. We call an R-submodule K ≤ M :
prime [13] iff K 6= M and for any N ≤ M and I ≤ R, we have
IN ⊆ K ⇒ N ⊆ K or IM ⊆ K.
first [1] iff K 6= 0 and for any N ≤ K and I ≤ R, we have
IN = 0 ⇒ N = 0 or IK = 0.
coprime [2] iff K 6= M and for any I ≤ R, we have
IM + K = M or IM ⊆ K.
second [2] iff K 6= 0 and for any I ≤ R we have
IK = K or IK = 0.
By Spec p (M) (resp. Spec f (M), Specc (M), Specs (M)) we denote the spectrum of prime (resp.
first, coprime, second) R-submodules of M.
1.33. An R-submodule K of M is said to be fully invariant [3] (and we write L ≤ f .i. M) iff
f (L) ⊆ L for all f ∈ S := End(M). If every submodule of M is fully invariant, then M is said to
be a duo module [3]. For any L1 , L2 ≤ M, we define
L1 ∗ L2 =
∑
f ∈Hom(M,L2 )
f (L1 ) and L1 ⊙M L2 =
\
f −1 (L2 );
f ∈S, f (L1 )=0
see [3] and [4]. Notice that if L1 ≤ f .i. M, then L1 ∗ L2 ⊆ L1 ∩ L2 .
1.34. A fully invariant submodule K ≤ f .i. M is: fully prime in M [3] iff K 6= M and for any
L1 , L2 ≤ f .i. M, we have
L1 ∗ L2 ⊆ K ⇒ L1 ⊆ K or L2 ⊆ K.
f .i.
fully coprime in M [4] iff K 6= 0 and for any L1 , L2 ≤R M we have
K ⊆ L1 ⊙M L2 ⇒ K ⊆ L1 or K ⊆ L2 .
By Spec f p (M) (resp. Spec f c (M)) we denote the spectrum of fully prime (resp. fully coprime)
R-submodules of M.
The following example summarizes some facts about some Zariski-like topologies on several
spectra of submodules of a given module.
Example 1.35. Consider X1 := Spec p (M), X2 := Specc (M), X3 := Spec f p (M), X4 := Specs (M),
X5 := Spec f (M) and X6 := Spec f c (M). Notice that X1 , X2 , X3 ⊆ L (M)\{M} and so one can
construct the classical Zariski topology τ cl
− on any of them as we did for general complete lattices
L = (L, ∧, ∨, 1, 0) and X ⊆ L\{1}. On the other hand, one can construct dual classical Zariski
p
topologies on τ dcl
− only any of X4 , X5 , X6 ⊆ L (M)\{0}. Moreover, M is top -module (resp. a
c
f
p
top -module, a top -module) if and only if LAT (M) is X1 -top (resp. X2 -top, X3 -top). On the
other hand, M is a tops -module (resp. a top f -module, a top f c-module) iff LAT (M) is dual X4 -top
(resp. dual X5 -top, dual X6 -top). The following table summarize some facts about these spaces.
12
Type
M∈
/ Spec− (M)
0∈
/ Spec− (M)
Subsets of L
X1
=
Spec p (M),
X2
=
Specc (M),
X3 = Spec f p (M)
X4
=
Spec f (M),
X5
=
Specs (M),
X6 = Spec f c (M)
Variety V − (N)
{P ∈ Spec− (M) | N ≤ P}
Subbase τ −
{X \V − (N) | N ≤ M}
{X \V − (N) | N ≤ M}
τ cl
τ cl
− : the topology generated by τ −
τ dc
− : the topology generated by τ −
L is Xi -top ⇔ τ − = τ cl
−
L 0 is X j -top ⇔ τ − =
τ dcl
−
or
τ dcl
(Dual) X -top
{P ∈ Spec− (M) | P ≤ N}
Table 1: Examples of spectra of submodules of a given module
Example 1.36. Let M be a local left module over an arbitrary ring R, i.e. M has a unique
maximum proper submodule (e.g. the Z-module Z pk , p is any prime and k is any positive
integer). Consider X1 = Spec p (M) and X2 = Specc (M). Then C X1 (LAT (M)) and C X2 (LAT (M))
satisfy the complete max property (notice that any maximal submodule is prime and coprime).
Example 1.37. Consider L := LAT (M), X1 = Spec p (M) and X2 = Specc (M). Every maximal
submodule of M is a prime and a coprime submodule, i.e. Max(M) ⊆ X1 and Max(M) ⊆ X2 . So, it
is enough to assume that R M is a coatomic module satisfying the complete max property to satisfy
the equivalent conditions of Corollary 1.29. Moreover, Corollary 1.28 applies if RAD p (M) :=
C X1 (L ) (resp. RADc (M) := C X2 (L ) ) satisfies the complete max property as a lattice.
Example 1.38. Consider L := LAT (M), X4 = Spec f (M) and X5 = Specs (M). Every simple
submodule of M is a second and a first submodule of M, i.e. S (M) ⊆ X4 and S (M) ⊆ X5 . So,
it is enough to assume that R M is an atomic module with the complete min property to satisfy
the equivalent conditions of Corollary 1.29 applied to L 0 . Moreover, Corollary 1.28 applies if
C X4 (L 0 ) (resp. C X5 (L 0 )) satisfies the complete min property as a lattice.
Remark 1.39. It was proved in [2], that if R M is a coatomic topc-module satisfying the complete
max property, then
Specc (M) = Max(M) ⇐⇒ X is T2 ⇔ X is T1 ⇔ X is discrete.
A similar result was proved for Spec f p (M) assuming that R M is a self projective coatomic duo
module (S − PCD). Notice that it was proved in [3, Remark 3.12] that if R M is self projective and
13
duo, then every maximal submodule is fully prime. Other conditions were assumed on M in the
dual cases to ensure that S (M) = Min(X ). So, Corollary 1.28 generalizes all the corresponding
results in [3] and [2].
1.3 Spectral Spaces
As before, L = (L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1) is a complete lattice.
1.40. A topological space is said to be spectral [15] iff it is homeomorphic to Spec(R), the
prime spectrum of a commutative ring R with the Zariski topology. Hochster [15, Proposition 4]
characterized such spaces. A topological space (X , τ ) is spectral if and only if all of the following
four conditions are satisfied:
1. X is compact;
2. X has a basis of compact open sets closed under finite intersections;
3. X is sober.
Remark 1.41. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. If X is finite, then (X , τ cl ) is spectral: By Proposition 1.17, X is
T0 and sober. The remaining Hochster’s conditions in 1.40 follow directly from the finiteness of
X.
Definition 1.42. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ). Set
√
R(L ) := { x | x ∈ L and V (x) is irreducible}.
(1)
We say that X satisfies the radical condition iff R(L ) ⊆ X .
Lemma 1.43. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ). If X is sober, then X satisfies the radical
condition. The converse holds if L is X -top.
Proposition 1.15
Proof. Let X be sober. Let x ∈ R(L ). Since
=
V (p) for some
√ X is sober, V (x) = {p}
p ∈ X . It follows by Lemma 1.8 (2) that x = p ∈ X .
For the converse, assume that L is X -top. Let F be a√closed irreducible subset of X . Since L
is X√-top, F = V√(x) for some x ∈ L. By our hypothesis, x ∈ X . By Lemma 1.8 (3), F = V (x) =
V ( x) and so x is the unique generic point of F (the uniqueness is obvious). Therefore, X is
sober.
Proposition 1.44. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that L is an X -top lattice. If L satisfies the ACC,
then every subset of (X , τ ) is compact.
14
Proof. Let A ⊆ X and suppose that O = {X \V (xi )) | xi ∈ L, i ∈ I} is an open cover for A. Since
W
W
L satisfies the ACC, i∈I xi = j∈J x j for some finite subset J ⊆ I. Notice that
A⊆
[
i∈I
(X \V (xi )) = X \V (
_
i∈I
xi )) = X \V (
_
xi )) =
i∈I
[
i∈J
(X \V (x j )),
i.e. {X \V (x j ) | j ∈ J} is a finite subcover of O for A.
Proposition 1.45. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that L is an X -top lattice. The following conditions are equivalent:
1. C (L ) satisfies the ACC;
2. Every subset of (X , τ ) is compact;
3. Every open set in (X , τ ) is compact.
√
√
˜ 0, 1). Since V (x) = V ( x) for
Proof. (1 ⇒ 2) : Consider the complete lattice √
(C (L), ∧, ∨,
˜ 0, 1) is an X -top lattice. By our assumption,
every x ∈ L, we conclude that C := (C (L), ∧, ∨,
C satisfies the ACC and so every subset of X is compact by Proposition 1.44.
(3 ⇒ 1) : Let a1 ≤ a2 ≤ a3 ≤ · · · be an ascending chain in C (L ). Notice that X \V (a1 ) ⊆
W̃∞
X \V (a2 ) ⊆ X \V (a3 ) ⊆ · · · . Setting b = i=1 ai , we observe that
X \V (b) = X \V (
∞
_
i=1
ai ) = X \
∞
\
i=1
V (ai ) =
∞
[
i=1
(X \V (ai )).
By our assumption, the open set X \V (b) is compact and so X \V (b) =
for some n ∈ N, i.e. b = an and the ascending chain stabilizes.
n
S
i=1
X \V (ai ) = X \V (an )
Corollary 1.46. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and L be an X -top lattice such that C (L ) satisfies the ACC.
Then (X , τ ) is spectral ⇔ (X , τ ) is sober.
Proof. By Proposition 1.17 X is T0 . The result follows now using Proposition 1.45 and Hochster’s
characterization for spectral spaces 1.40.
In [11], the so called finer patch topology was used to prove that for any left module M over an
associative ring R, and X = Spec p (M), the classical Zariski topology (X , τ cl ) is a spectral space
provided that the ACC holds for intersections of prime submodules of M.
1.47. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. The finer patch topology τ fp on X is the one whose subbase is
B = {V (x) ∩ X \V (y) | x, y ∈ L}.
It is clear that τ cl ⊆ τ fp . So, if τ fp is compact, then τ cl is compact.
15
(2)
Example 1.48. Let P be the set of all prime numbers in Z and consider the ring R = ∏ p∈P Z p .
Then the finer patch topology associated with Spec(R) is not compact while, trivially, the classical Zariski topology is compact. In general, if R is a ring with zero dimension and Spec(R) is
infinite, then the finer patch topology associated with Spec(R) is not compact while, trivially, the
classical Zariski topology is compact.
Proposition 1.49. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. If (X , τ fp ) is compact, then (X , τ cl ) is spectral.
Proof. Assume that (X , τ fp ) is compact. We apply Hochster’s characterizations of spectral spaces
to prove that (X , τ cl ) is spectral. Notice that (X , τ cl ) is T0 by Proposition 1.17 and is compact
since τ cl ⊆ τ fp .
Claim I: (X , τ cl ) is sober.
Let Y ⊆ X be a closed irreducible set in (X , τ cl ). Then Y
Proposition 1.15 S
=
V (p). On the other
p∈Y
hand Y is closed in (X , τ fp ), whence compact in (X , τ fp ) (recall that every closed subset of a
compact space is compact). Therefore, the open cover O := {V (p) : p ∈ Y } of Y has a finite
subcover {V (p1 ), · · · ,V (pn )}, i.e. Y =
i=n
S
pi . But Y is irreducible, whence Y = V (pk ) for some
i=1
k ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}. Clearly, pk is the unique generic point of Y.
Claim II: X has a basis of compact open sets closed under finite intersections.
We prove this claim in two steps.
Step 1: Every basic open subset of (X , τ cl ) is compact.
Let B be a basic open subset of (X , τ cl ), i.e. B =
i=n
T
i=1
X \V (xi ) for some {x1 , · · · , xn } ⊆ L.
Observe that X \V (xi ) is closed in (X , τ fp ) ∀i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}. So, B is closed in (X , τ ), whence
compact in (X , τ fp ). Since τ cl ⊆ τ fp , B is compact in (X , τ cl ).
Step 2: The collection of open compact subsets of (X , τ cl ) is closed under arbitrary intersections.
mi
n T
S
X \V (xi j ) for some
Let U be an open compact set in (X , τ cl ). Then we can write U =
i=1 j=1
subset {xi j | j = 1, 2, · · · , mi , i = 1, · · · , n} (the union is finite because of the compactness of U ).
Notice that U is closed in (X , τ fp ). So, any intersection of open compact subsets in (X , τ cl ) is
closed in (X , τ fp ); so it is compact in (X , τ fp ), whence compact in (X , τ cl ).
Example 1.50. The ring of integers Z is Noetherian and so the finer patch topology on Spec(Z)
is compact because the ACC is satisfied on the radical ideals by [11, Theorem 2.2]. This example
shows that (X , τ fp ) can be compact although X is infinite.
Example 1.51. Let L be infinite and be such that the elements of X := L\{0, 1} are not comparable (notice that for all a 6= b in X we have a ∧ b = 0 and a ∨ b = 1). Notice that (X , τ fp ) is not
compact, whereas (X , τ cl ) is compact because it is the cofinite topology on X . Notice also that
C (L ) satisfies the ACC and every element in C (L ) can be written as an irredundant meet of
elements in X , but this guarantees the compactness for the finer patch topology. Observe that L
is not X -top and (X , τ cl ) is not sober and hence not spectral.
16
Proposition 1.52. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ). If V (x) is reducible for some x ∈ L, then
V (x) =
n
S
i=1
V (xi ) for some elements x1 , x2 , · · · , xn ∈ L, where V (xi ) $ V (x) for all i = 1, 2, · · · , n.
Proof. Let V (x) be reducible for some x ∈ L, i.e. V (x) = F1 ∪ F2 where both F1 and F2 are
T S l
T S i
V (xi j ) and F2 = l∈L m
closed proper subsets of V (x). Suppose that F1 = i∈I nj=1
k=1 V (ylk ) for
some {xi j }, {ylk } ⊆ L. Since F1 and F2 are proper subsets of V (x), we have V (x) *
for some i0 ∈ I and V (x) *
Sml0
Sml0
k=1 V (yl0 k )
for some l0 ∈ L, whence V (x) 6=
Sni0
Sni0
j=1 V (xi0 j )
j=1 V (xi0 j ) ∩ V (x)
and V (x) 6= k=1 V (yl0 k ) ∩ V (x). Set xr := xi0 r ∨ x for r = 1, 2, · · · , ni0 and xni0 +r = yl0 r ∨ x for
S
r = 1, 2, · · · , ml0 and let n := ni0 + ml0 . By construction, V (x) = nr=1 V (xr ), where each V (xr ) is
a proper subset of V (x).
As a direct consequence of Proposition 1.52, we obtain the following result which recovers
[10, Proposition 2.26] proved for the prime spectrum of a module over a ring.
Corollary 1.53. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that |X | ≥ 2. If (X , τ cl ) is T2 , then there exist
x1 , x2 , · · · , xn ∈ L such that X =
n
S
i=1
V (xi ), while X 6= V (xi ) for all i = 1, 2, · · · , n.
The radical condition is automatically satisfied by the spectrum of prime submodules of a
given left module over an associative ring by [10, Theorem 3.4, Corollary 3.6]. However, we
need to check it when dealing with other cases.
The following result generalizes [11, Theorem 3.2]:
Theorem 1.54. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ). If X satisfies the radical condition, then
C (L ) satisfies the ACC if and only if (X , τ fp ) is compact. It follows that, If C (L ) satisfies the
ACC and X satisfies the radical condition, then (X , τ cl ) is spectral.
Proof. Assume that C (L ) satisfies the ACC and that X satisfies the radical condition. We need
only to prove that (X , τ fp ) is compact since it will follow then, by Proposition 1.49, that (X , τ cl )
is spectral.
Suppose that (X , τ fp ) is not compact, i.e. there is an open cover A in τ fp for X which does
not have a finite subcover for X .
Let
E := {x ∈ C (L) | V (x) is not covered by a finite subcover of A }.
√
/ Since C (L ) satisfies the ACC, E has a maximal element p.
Observe that 0 ∈ E, i.e. E 6= 0.
Notice that V (p) 6= 0.
/
Case 1: p ∈
/ X . Since X satisfies the radical condition, V (p) is reducible and it follows by
Proposition 1.52 that V (p) =
n
S
i=1
V (xi ) for some x1 , · · · , xn ∈ C (L) (see Lemma 1.8 (3)), where
V (xi ) $ V (p), whence p xi , for all i ∈ {1, · · · , n}. Since p is maximal in E and p xi , V (xi )
is covered by a finite subcover of A for all i ∈ {1, · · · , n}. Hence V (p) is covered by a finite
subcover of A , a contradiction.
17
Case 2: p ∈ X . It follows that p ∈ O for some O ∈ A and so p ∈ B, where B is a basic open
subset of O. Assume that
B=
n
\
(V (xi ) ∩ X \V (yi )) for some subset {x1 , · · · , xn , y1 , · · · , xn } ⊆ L.
i=1
Observe that zi := yi ∨ p p as yi p ∀ i ∈ {1, 2, · · ·n}.
Claim: V (p) ∩
n
T
i=1
X \V (zi ) ⊆ B. To prove this claim, let q ∈ V (p) ∩
n
T
i=1
X \V (zi ) for all i ∈
{1, 2, · · · , n}, whence p ≤ q and yi ∨ p q for all i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}. It follows that p ≤ q and
yi q for all i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}. But xi ≤ p for all i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n} whence xi ≤ q and yi q for all
i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}, i.e. q ∈
n
T
i=1
(V (xi ) ∩ X \V (yi )) = B as claimed.
Now, notice that for all i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}, we have p
subcover Ai of A . On the other hand, V (p)\
n
S
i=1
zi and so V (zi ) is covered by a finite
V (zi ) = V (p) ∩
n
T
i=1
X \V (zi ) ⊆ B ⊆ O. Hence
{O} ∪ A1 ∪ A2 ∪ · · · ∪ An is a finite subcover of A for V (p), which is a contradiction.
Therefore, (X , τ fp ) is compact.
Conversely, assume that (X , τ fp ) is compact. Suppose that C (L ) does not satisfy the ACC.
Then there is an infinite strictly increasing chain a1 a2 .... of elements in C (L ). Since
(X , τ fp ) is compact, V (a1 ) is compact as it is closed. But one can check that {V (ai )∩(X \V (ai+1 )) |
i = 1, 2, ...} ∪ {V (
∞
W
ai )} is an open cover for V (x1 ) which does not have a finite subcover, a con-
i=1
tradiction.
Remark 1.55. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. The radical condition in Theorem 1.54 is necessary for (X , τ cl )
to be spectral. Recall that this condition is satisfied if X is sober (see Lemma 1.43).
Definition 1.56. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. An element p ∈ X is called minimal in X over x ∈ L iff p = q
whenever x ≤ q ≤ p for some q ∈ X .
Corollary 1.57. Let X ⊆ L\{1}. Assume that C (L ) satisfies the ACC, and that for any x ∈
C (L)\(X ∪ {1}) with V (x) 6= 0/ there is a completely strongly irreducible minimal element in X
over it with respect to (C (L), ∧). Then (X , τ fp ) is compact (and consequently (X , τ cl ) is spectral).
Proof. We claim that X satisfies the radical condition. Let x ∈ R(L )\X . In particular, V (x) 6= 0.
/
V
qp
Let p be a completely strongly irreducible minimal element in X over x. Then
q∈V (x)\{p}
(otherwise, q∈V (x)\{p} q ≤ p and the complete strong irreducibility of p would imply that q p
V
for some q ∈ V (x) contradicting the minimality of p over x). Therefore, V (x) = V ( q∈V (x)\{p} q)∪
V (p) a union of proper closed subsets and so V (x) is reducible, a contradiction. So, X satisfies
the radical condition. Now, the hypotheses of Theorem 1.54 are satisfied and it follows that
(X , τ fp ) is compact and consequently (X , τ cl ) is spectral.
V
18
Theorem 1.58. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and consider (X , τ cl ). Assume that C (L ) satisfies the DCC and
that Min(X ) ⊆ SI(C (L )). Then (X , τ fp ) is compact if and only if V (p) is finite ∀p ∈ Min(X ).
Proof. Assume that C (L ) satisfies the DCC and that Min(X ) ⊆ SI(C (L )). We show that
S
(X , τ fp ) is compact. Notice first of all that X =
V (p), since C (L ) satisfies the DCC.
p∈Min(X)
Claim: Min(X ) is finite. To prove this claim, notice that
V
p=
n
V
i=1
p∈Min(X)
pi for some {p1 , p2 , · · · , pn } ⊆
Min(X ) (since C (L ) satisfies the DCC). So, ni=1 pi ≤ p for all p ∈ Min(X ). By assumption,
Min(X ) ⊆ SI(C (L )), whence p = pi for some i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}. Consequently, Min(X ) is finite.
If V (p) is finite ∀p ∈ Min(X ), then X is finite, whence (X , τ fp ) is compact.
Conversely, suppose that (X , τ fp ) is compact and that V (p) is infinite for some p ∈ Min(X ).
Case 1: V (p) contains an infinite chain p = x1 x2 .... which does not stabilize. Consider
V
the open cover A := {V (xi ) ∩ (X \V (xi+1 ) | i = 1, 2, ..} ∪ {V (
∞
W
xi )} for V (p). Clearly A has no
i=1
finite subcover for V (x1 ), whence (X , τ fp ) is not compact, a contradiction.
Case 2: V (p) does not contain any infinite chain. It follows that there is an infinite subset
V
V
A ⊆ V (p) of incomparable elements. Since C (L ) satisfied the DCC, it follows that
x=
x
x∈A
for some finite subset F ⊆ A. Since A is infinite, there is q ∈ A\F such that p
a contradiction.
x∈F
q for some p ∈ F,
Lemma 1.59. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and L be an X -top lattice. Assume that C (L ) satisfies the DCC.
Then X ⊆ SI(C (L )).
Proof. Since L is an X -top lattice, we have τ = τ cl . Notice that for every p ∈ X , the singleton
{p} is irreducible in (X , τ ), whence p = I({p}) is strongly irreducible in (C (L), ∧) by Proposition 1.22.
Corollary 1.60. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and L be an X -top lattice. If C (L ) satisfies the DCC, then
(X , τ fp ) is compact if and only if V (p) is finite ∀p ∈ Min(X ).
Proof. Follows directly by applying Lemma 1.59 and Theorem 1.58.
Example 1.61. Let L = (L, ∧, ∨, 1, 0) be a complete lattice, where L is an infinite ascending
W
chain x1 ≤ x2 ≤ · · · endowed with a maximum element 1 such that xi = 1 for every infinite
i∈I
subset I ⊆ N. Let X = L\{1}. Then C (L ) satisfies the DCC, and Min(X ) ⊆ SI(C (L ). Hence,
τ fp is not compact by Theorem 1.58 because V (x1 ) is infinite. Moreover, every descending chain
of (X , τ ) is a spectral subspace.
19
In what follows, R is a ring, M is a left R-module and consider L := LAT (M), the complete
lattice of left R-submodules of M.
Example 1.62. Let X = Spec p (M), the spectrum of prime R-submodules of M. By [10, Theorem 3.4 (i)], Spec p (M) satisfies the radical condition. Therefore, Theorem 1.54 recovers [11,
Theorem 3.2] as a special case.
Example 1.63. Let R M be Noetherian and X = SI(M), the spectrum of strongly irreducible
R-submodules of M, whence L is X -top. By [1, Proposition 2.7], SI(M) satisfies the radical
condition. Therefore (SI(M), τ fp ) is compact and (SI(M), τ ) is spectral.
Example 1.64. Applying Theorem 1.54, we obtain several examples of spectral spaces:
1. If R M is duo and C (L ) satisfies the ACC, then Spec f p (M) is spectral (notice that Spec f p (M)
satisfies the radical condition by [3, Proposition 3.30]).
2. If R M is duo and H (L) satisfies the DCC, then X = Spec f c (M) is spectral (notice that
X = Spec f c (M) satisfies the radical condition by [4, Proposition 3.25]).
3. If R M is a completely distributive topc-module and C (L ) satisfies the ACC, then Specc (M)
is spectral (notice that X = Specc (M) satisfies the radical condition by [2, Proposition 5.19
(i)]).
4. If R M is a tops -module and H (L) satisfies the DCC, then Specs (M) is spectral (notice that
X = Specs (M) satisfies the radical condition by [2, Proposition 4.14 (i)]).
5. If R M is a top f -module, I(A) is first for every irreducible subset A ⊆ Spec f (M) and H (L)
satisfies the DCC, then Spec f (M) is spectral (notice that the assumption on the irreducible
subsets of X = Spec f (M) is equivalent to X satisfying the radical condition by [1, Remark
4.25]).
2 Algebraic versus Topological Properties
As before, L = (L, ∧, ∨, 0, 1) is a complete lattice. In this section we study the interplay between
the topological properties of (X , τ cl ) where X ⊆ L\{1} (or (X , τ dcl ) where X ⊆ L\{0}) and the
algebraic properties of L . Applications will be given to the special case L = LAT (R M), where
R is a ring and M is a left R-module.
2.1. We say that an element x ∈ L is is finitely constructed in L iff x cannot be written as
an infinite irredundant join of elements of L, that is, for any collection {xi }i∈I ⊆ L such that
W
W
xi = x, there is a finite sub-collection {x j } j∈J of {xi }i∈I with
x j = x. An element x is called
i∈I
j∈J
countably finitely constructed in L iff x cannot be written as an infinite countable irredundant
W
join of elements of L, i.e. for any countable collection {xi }i∈I ⊆ L with xi = x, there is a finite
i∈I
sub-collection {x j } j∈J of {xi }i∈I with
W
x j = x. An element x is called countably constructed
j∈J
in L iff x cannot be written as an uncountable irredundant join of elements of L.
20
We collect first some remarks:
Remarks 2.2. Let L be an X -top lattice, X ⊆ L\{1} and consider the topological space (X , τ ).
1. The following are equivalent:
(a) (X , τ ) is irreducible;
√
(b) 0 ∈ SI(C (L ));
(c) If X =
S
i∈I
V (xi ), then either I is infinite or there is i0 ∈ I such that xi0 is a lower bound
for X .
2. (X , τ ) is T1 if and only if Max(X ) = X .
3. (X , τ ) is Noetherian ⇔ C (L ) satisfies the ACC ⇔ each set in X is compact ⇔ each open
set in X is compact.
4. (X , τ ) is Artinian ⇔ C (L ) satisfies the DCC ⇔ every closed cover for any subset of X
has a finite subcover.
5. (X , τ ) is (countably) compact if and only if 1 is (countably) finitely constructed in C (L ).
6. If SI(C (L )) ⊆ X , then (X , τ ) is sober.
7. If X satisfies the radical condition, then (X , τ ) is sober.
8. Assume that C (L ) satisfies the complete max property. Then, (X , τ ) is T1 ⇔ (X , τ ) is
discrete.
9. If (X , τ ) is an atomic, Lindelof (compact) and V (p) is open ∀ p ∈ Min(X ), then Min(X ) is
countable (finite).
10. V (x) is irreducible for every x ∈ X .
Proof. Let L be an X -top lattice.
1. (a ⇔ b) Apply Corollary 1.23 to V (0) = X .
(a ⇒ c) Suppose that X =
S
i∈I
V (xi ) with I finite. Since X is irreducible, V (xi0 ) = X for
some i0 ∈ I whence xi0 a lower bound for X .
(c ⇒ a) Suppose that X = V (x) ∪V (y) for some x, y ∈ L. By our assumption, x is a lower
bound for X whence X = V (x) or y is a lower X whence X = V (y). Therefore, X is
irreducible.
2. Apply Proposition 1.26 to (X , τ ) = (X , τ cl ).
21
3. It is easy to check that the first two statements are equivalent. The remaining equivalences
follow by applying Proposition 1.15 to (X , τ ) = (X , τ cl ).
4. Notice that any open set in X has the form X \V (x) where x ∈ C (L). The equivalence of
the first two statements is straightforward. We claim that they are equivalent to the third
statement.
Assume that C (L ) satisfies the DCC. Let U ⊆ X and {V (x) | x ∈ A} be a closed cover, i.e.
S
U ⊆ Y :=
V (x), and assume without loss of generality that A ⊆ C (L). It follows that
I(Y ) =
V x∈A
x. Since C (L ) satisfies the DCC, I(Y ) =
x∈B
x∈A
follows that
Y
Lemma 1.11
=
V (I(Y )) = V (
^
x)
x∈B
Therefore, U ⊆
V
S
x∈B
x for some finite subset B ⊆ I. It
[1, Theorem 2.2] [
=
V (x).
x∈B
V (x) for some finite subset B ⊆ A.
Conversely, suppose that x1 ≥ x2 ≥ · · · is a descending chain in C (L ) and consider the
induced ascending chain V (x1 ) ⊆ V (x2 ) ⊆ · · · . Let Y =
n
S
i=1
∞
S
V (xi ). By assumption, Y =
i=1
V (xi ) for some n ∈ N, whence V (xn ) = V (xm ) for all m ≥ n and consequently, xn = xm
for all m ≥ n by Lemma 1.8.
5. Assume that X is (countably) compact and suppose that 1 = i∈I xi where xi ∈ C (L) (and
W̃
T
S
I is countable). It follows that 0/ = V ( i∈I xi ) = i∈I V (xi ), i.e. X = i∈I (X \V (xi )). Since
S
X is (countably) compact, X = j∈F (X \V (x j )) for some finite subset F of I and so 1 =
W̃
j∈F x j . So, 1 is (countably) finitely constructed. The converse can be obtained similarly.
√
6. Let F ⊆ X be a closed irreducible subset. Then F = V (x) for some x ∈ L, whence x ∈
SI(C (L )) ⊆ X by Proposition 1.22. The uniqueness of the generic point is obvious.
W̃
7. This follows by Lemma 1.43.
8. This follows by applying Corollary 1.28 to (X , τ cl ) = (X , τ ).
9. Assume that X is Lindelof (compact). Since X is atomic, X =
S
V (p), whence the
p∈Min(X)
open cover {V (p) | p ∈ Min(X )} has a countable (finite) subcover for X , i.e. X =
S
V (p)
p∈A
for some countable (finite) subset A ⊆ Min(X ). Claim: Min(X ) = A. Let q ∈ Min(X ).
S
Since X =
(V (p), we have q ∈ V (p) for some p ∈ A, whence q = p by the minimality
p∈A
of q. Consequently Min(X ) is countable (finite).
10. This is obtained by applying Proposition 1.15 to (X , τ cl ) = (X , τ ).
22
Theorem 2.3. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that L is an X -top lattice.
1. The following are equivalent for the sublattice
˜ = 1 and x ∧ y =
C ′ (L ) = {x ∈ C (L) | x∨y
√
0 for some y ∈ C (L)}
of C (L ) :
(a) (X , τ ) is connected.
(b) If x ∈ L is such that 0/ 6= V (x) ( X , then V (x) is not open.
√
√
(c) V (x) ∩ V (y) 6= 0/ for all x ∈ L such that x ∈
/ { 0, 1} and for all y ∈ L such that
X \V (x) ⊆ V (y).
√
(d) C ′ (L ) = { 0, 1}.
2. Let (X , τ ) be T1 . Then X is singleton if and only if (X , τ ) is connected and C (L ) satisfies
the complete max property.
3. If X is coatomic and Max(X ) is countable (finite), then (X , τ ) is Lindelof (compact).
4. Let X be coatomic. Then Max(X ) is singleton if and only if (X , τ ) is connected and each
element in Max(X ) is completely strongly irreducible in (C (L), ∧) .
5. Let L be coatomic and Max(L) ⊆ X . Then (X , τ ) is ultraconnected if and only if L is
hollow.
6. Let 0/ 6= X be atomic. Then (X , τ ) is reducible if and only if Min(X ) = I1 ∪ I2 such that
V
V
p ql for some ql ∈ Il and p∈I1 p q2 for some q2 ∈ I2 .
p∈I2
7. Let 0/ 6= X be atomic. Then (X , τ ) is connected if and only if for every 0/ 6= m ( Min(X )
there exists some q ∈ X such that
∧ p∈m p
_
∧ p∈Max(X)\m p ≤ q.
Proof. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that L is an X -top lattice.
√
˜ ′ = 1 and
˜ ′ = 1, x ∧ x′ = 0, y∨y
1. Let x, y ∈√C ′ . Then there are x′ , y′ ∈ C (L) such that x∨x
′
′
˜ are also in C with the corresponding
y ∧ y = 0. One can check that x ∧ y and x∨y
′
′
′
′
˜ and x ∧ y respectively (recall that if L is X -top then C (L ) is distributive
elements x ∨y
by [1, Theorem 2.2]).
The equivalence (a) ⇔ (b) is trivial.
√
√
(a ⇒ c) Let x, y ∈ L be such that x ∈
/ { 0, 1} and X \V (x) ⊆ V (y). It follows that V (x) ∪
V (y) = X , whence V (x) ∩V (y) 6= 0/ (otherwise, X will be disconnected).
23
√
√
(c ⇒ b) Suppose that 0/ 6= V (x) ( X is open for some x ∈ L, so that x ∈
/ { 0, 1}. Let
y ∈ L be such that X \V (x) = V (y). By our assumption, V (x) ∩V (y) 6= 0/ (a contradiction).
√
˜ = 1. Clearly,
(c ⇒ d) Let x ∈ C ′ (L ). Then there is y ∈ C (L) such that x ∧ y = 0 and x∨y
˜
˜ 6= 1,
x and y satisfy the conditions stated in (c), whence V (x∨y) = V (x) ∩V (y) 6= 0,
/ i.e. x∨y
which is a contradiction.
(d ⇒ a) Suppose that V (x) ∪ V (y) = X , V (x) ∩ V (y) = 0/ for some x, y ∈ L, and assume
without loss of generality that x, y ∈ C (L). It is easy to show that x, y ∈ C ′ (L ), and it
follows by (d) that V (x) = X or V (x) = 0.
/
2. Let (X , τ ) be T1 . If C (L ) satisfies the complete max property, then applying Corollary
1.28 to (X , τ ) = (X , τ cl ), we conclude that X is discrete. If X is moreover connected, then
X is indeed a singleton. The converse is trivial.
3. Let X be coatomic and Max(X ) be countable (finite). Let A = {X \V (x) | x ∈ A} be an
T
open cover for X . Then
V (x) = 0/ and so for any p ∈ Max(X ), there exists x p ∈ A such
that p ∈
/ V (x p ). Claim:
x∈A T
p∈Max(X)
V (x p ) = 0.
/ Suppose that q ∈
coatomic, q ≤ p̃ for some p̃ ∈ Max(X ) and so p̃ ∈
It follows that X =
S
p∈Max(X)
T
T
V (x p ). Since X is
p∈Max(X)
V (x p ), a contradiction.
p∈Max(X)
(X \V (x p )), i.e. {X \V (x p | p ∈ Max(X )} is a countable (finite)
subcover of A for X .
4. Let X be coatomic.
(⇒) Assume that Max(X ) = {p}. For all q ∈ X , q ≤ p as X is coatomic and so p is
completely irreducible in the (C , ∧). Also, if X = V (x) ∪ V (y) and V (x),V (y) 6= 0,
/ then
p ∈ V (x) ∩V (y) and so X is connected.
(⇐) Suppose that |Max(X )| ≥ 2 and let Max(X ) = M′ ∪ M′′ with M′ ∩ M′′ = 0/ for some
0/ 6= M′ ( Max(X ). Set
A := {p ∈ X | p ≤ q for some q ∈ M′ and p q ∀ q ∈ M′′ },
B := X \A, x :=
V
p and y :=
V
p.
p∈B
p∈A
Claim: V (x) ∩V (y) = 0.
/
Suppose that p̃ ∈ V (x) ∩V (y), whence y ≤ p̃ ≤ q̃ for some q̃ ∈ Max(X ). Since q̃ is comV
pletely strongly irreducible, q̃ ∈ M′ : otherwise, q̃ ∈ M′′ and x =
p ≤ q̃ implies that
p′
M′′
p∈A
′
M . Similarly,
p′
≤ q̃ ∈
for some ∈ A, a contradiction. Hence, y ≤ q̃ ∈
since q̃ is
completely strongly irreducible, q′ ≤ q̃ for some q′ ∈ B, which is a contradiction. Therefore V (x) ∩V (y) = 0,
/ and V (x) and V (y) are non-empty (M′ ⊆ V (x) and M′′ ⊆ V (y)) with
V (x) ∪V (y) = X , whence X is disconnected.
24
5. Let L be coatomic and Max(L) ⊆ X .
(⇒) Assume that X is ultraconnected. Let x, y ∈ L\{1}. Since L is coatomic, there are
p, q ∈ Max(L ) ⊆ X with x ≤ p and y ≤ q, whence V (x) and V (y) are non-empty. By
assumption, X is ultraconnected, whence V (x ∨ y) = V (x) ∩ V (y) 6= 0.
/ Hence x ∨ y 6= 1.
Consequently, L is hollow.
(⇐) Assume that L is hollow. Let V (x) and V (y) be non-empty closed subsets for some
x, y ∈ L. Then x, y ∈ L\{1}, whence x ∨ y 6= 1 as L is hollow. Since L is coatomic,
x ∨ y ≤ q for some q ∈ Max(L ) ⊆ X . Hence V (x) ∩V (y) = V (x ∨ y) 6= 0.
/ Therefore, X is
ultraconnected.
6. Let X be reducible, i.e. X = V (x)∪V (y) for some x, y ∈ L such that V (x) ( X and V (y) ( X .
Set
I1 = {p ∈ Min(X ) | x ≤ p} and I2 = {p ∈ Min(X ) | y ≤ p}.
√
√
V
V
√
p and y =
p. Indeed, x q2 for some q2 ∈ I2 :
Since X is atomic, x =
p∈I1
p∈I2
√
√
otherwise, x ≤ p ∀ p ∈ I2 and it follows that V (x) = X . Similarly, y q1 for some
q1 ∈ I1 . The converse is trivial.
7. Let 0/ 6= X be atomic.
(⇒) Assume that X is connected. Let 0/ 6= m ( Min(X ), x := ∧ p∈m p and y = ∧ p∈Max(X)\m p.
Since X is atomic, X = V (x) ∪ V (y). Since X is connected, V (x ∨ y) = V (x) ∩ V (y) 6= 0,
/
i.e. ∃ q ∈ X such that x ∨ y ≤ q.
(⇐) Suppose that X = V (x) ∪V (y) for some x, y ∈ L. Set
m′ := {p ∈ Min(X ) ∩V (x)} and m′′ := Min(X )\m′.
Case 1: m′ = 0.
/ In this case, X = V (y).
Case 2: m′ = Min(X ). In this case, X = V (x).
√ √
Case 3: 0/ 6= m′ ( Min(X ). By our assumption, x ∨ y ≤ q for some q ∈ X and so
√
√ √
√
V (x) ∩V (y) = V ( x) ∩V ( y) = V ( x ∨ y) 6= 0.
/
Consequently, X is connected.
Example 2.4. Let M be a left module
over an arbitrary ring R. Consider X1 = Spec p (M) and
√
X2 = Specc (M). Suppose that 0 = 0 (e.g. the Z-module Z[x]). Then the set C ′ which was
described in Theorem 2.3 (1) is the set of the prime radical direct summands (resp. the coprime
radical direct summands).
Corollary 2.5. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume that L is an X -top lattice.
25
1. Let X be atomic, coatomic with |Max(X )| ≤ |Min(X )| and V (p) is open ∀ p ∈ Min(X ),
then (X , τ ) is Lindelof (compact) if and only if Max(X ) is countable (finite).
2. Let X = Max(L ). Then |Max(L )| = 1 if and only if (X , τ ) is connected and C (L )
satisfies the complete max property.
Proof.
1. If (X , τ ) is Lindelof, then Min(X ) is countable by Remark 2.2(10). Conversely,
assume that Max(X ) is countable (finite). Let O = {X \V (x) | x ∈ A ⊆ L} be an open cover
T
for X , i.e.
V (x) = 0/ and assume without loss of generality that V (x) 6= 0/ for each x ∈ A
x∈A
(If V (y) = 0/ for some y ∈ A, then {X \V (y)} is a finite subcover of X ). Pick x′ ∈ A and set
M := {q ∈ Max(X ) | x′ ≤ q}. Observe that M is non-empty as V (x′ ) 6= 0/ and X is coatomic.
For each q ∈ M, pick X \V (xq ) ∈ O that contains q.
Claim: x′ ∨
W
q∈M
xq p for each p ∈ Max(X ).
Case (1): p ∈ M. In this case, x p p and so x′ ∨
W
q∈M
xq p.
Case (2): p ∈ Max(X )\M. In this case, x′ p and so x′ ∨
Therefore, V (x′ ∨
W
W
q∈M
xq p.
xq ) = 0/ and
q∈M
{X \V (x′ )} ∪ {X \V (xq ) | q ∈ M}
is a countable (finite) subcover of O as Max(X ) is countable (finite).
2. Assume that Max(L ) = X , whence Max(X ) = X = Max(L ). It follows by Corollary 1.28
that X is T1 . So, we can use now Theorem 2.3 (2).
Theorem 2.6. Let X ⊆ L\{1} and assume the L is an X -top lattice.
1. There is a 1-1 correspondence
C (L)
closed sets in (X , τ ).
←→
2. If SI(C (L )) ⊆ X , then there is a 1-1 correspondence
X
←→
Irreducible closed sets in (X , τ ).
3. If SI(C (L )) ⊆ X , then there is a 1-1 correspondence
Min(X )
←→
Irreducible components in (X , τ ).
26
Proof. Since L is X -top, the set of closed sets in X is given by V = {V (y) | y ∈ L}. Define
f : C (L) −→ V , x 7→ V (x);
√
g : V −→ C (L), V (y) 7→ y.
1. For any x ∈ C (L) and y ∈ L, we have
√
(g ◦ f )(x) = g(V (x)) = x = x;
√
√
( f ◦ g)(V (y)) = f ( y) = V ( y) = V (y).
So, f provides a 1-1 correspondence C (L) ←→ V with inverse g.
2. Consider the restrictions of f to X and of g to the class of irreducible closed varieties. For
every x ∈ X , the variety V (x) is irreducible by Proposition 1.15 (2). On the other hand, if
√
V (y) is irreducible for some y ∈ L, then y is strongly irreducible in C (L ) by Proposition
√
1.22, whence y ∈ X by our assumption.
3. Consider the restrictions of f to Min(X ) and of g to the class of irreducible components in
(X , τ ).
For every x ∈ Min(X ). By (2), V (x) is irreducible. Suppose that V (x) ⊆ V (y) for some
√
y ∈ L with V (y) irreducible. Since SI(C (L )) ⊆ X , it follows by (2) that y ∈ X , whence
√
√
y ≤ x. However, x in minimal in X , whence x = y and V (x) = V (y).
On the other hand, let A be an irreducible component in (X , τ ). Any irreducible component
is closed. Moreover, I(A) is strongly irreducible in C (L ) as A is irreducible, hence I(A) ∈
X . Suppose that p ≤ I(A) for some p ∈ X . It follows that A = A = V (I(A)) ⊆ V (p) = {p}.
However, V (p) is irreducible as it is the closure of a singleton, so V (p) = A as A is an
irreducible component. So, p = I(A). Consequently, I(A) ∈ Min(X ).
Example 2.7. The first correspondence (C (L (M)) ←→ closed sets in (X , τ )) of Theorem
2.6 holds for any X ⊆ L (M)\{M} such that L is X -top, as well as for any X ⊆ L (M)\{0}
such that L is dual X -top. So, this result recovers [2, 4.12 and 5.16], [3, 3.27] and [4, 3.23] as
special cases.
The following table summarizes some of the results we obtained in this section. Some of them
generalize results in the literature on Zariski-like topologies for left modules over associative
rings, which can be recovered now as special cases. At several occasions, our results were
obtained under conditions and assumptions weaker than those in the corresponding results in the
literature.
27
Assumption & location
X -top lattice L
(X , τ )
Results recovered
Proposition 1.26
Max(X ) = X
T1
[2, 4.27, 5.33], [3,
3.45])
C (L )
ACC
C (L )
ACC
C (L )
ACC
C (L )
DCC
Each set in X is
compact
Proposition 1.45
Remark 2.2 (3)
Proposition 1.45
Remark 2.2 (4)
Noetherian
satisfies the
Theorem 2.3 (1)
Corollary 1.23
Corollary 1.23
Corollary 1.23
SI(C (L ))
(2.6)
⊆
X
√
SI(C (L ))
(2.6)
⊆
X
√
Max(L ) = X and
C (L ) satisfies the
complete max property (2.3 (2))
[2, 4.12, 5.16])
Each open set in X
is compact
satisfies the
Artinian
[2, 4.12, 5.16]
Every closed cover
for any subset of X
has a finite subcover
Max(X ) = X and
C (L ) satisfies the
complete max property √
C ′ = { 0, 1}
I(A) ∈ SI(C (L ))
I(A) is irreducible
in
√ C (L )
0 is irreducible in
C (L )
Theorem 1.27
Remark 2.2 (5)
satisfies the
C (L ) satisfies the
DCC
Remark 2.2 (4)
Remark 2.2 (5)
satisfies the
Discrete
[2, 4.28, 5.34], [3,
3.46], [1, 4.33])
Connected
A ⊆ X is irreducible
[3, 3.30, 3.31]
A ⊆ X is irreducible
[3, 3.30, 3.31]
irreducible
[3, 3.30, 3.31]
x∈X
V (x) is irreducible
x ∈ Min(X )
V (x) is irreducible
component
|Max(X )| = 1
[2, 4.17, 5.22], [2,
3.27], [3, 3.33], [10,
3.6], [1, 4.28]
[2, 5.22], [2, 4.17],
[3, 3.27], [3, 3.33],
[1, 4.28]
Connected
1 is finitely constructed
1 is countably constructed
Compact
Lindelof
Table 2: Examples on the Interplay between topological properties of (X , τ ) and algebraic properties of the X − top lattice L
28
Lemma 2.8. Let R be a ring and M a top p-module, that is L := LAT (R M) is Spec p (M)-top.
Then
SI(C (LAT (M))) ⊆ Spec p (M).
Proof. Let N be strongly irreducible in C (L ). Suppose that IK ⊆ N for some ideal I ≤ R and a
submodule
P ∈ V (N), whence IM ⊆ P or K ⊆ P
√ IK ⊆ P for any√prime submodule
√
√ K ≤ M. Then
IM
⊆
P
or
K
⊆
P,
whence
IM
∩
K
⊆
P
for
all P ∈ V (N). Since √
N is radical,
and
so
√
√
IM√
∩ K ⊆ N. By assumption, N is strongly irreducible in C (L ), whence IM ⊆ IM ⊆ N or
K ⊆ K ⊆ N. Therefore, N ∈ Spec p (M).
Example 2.9. Let R be a ring and M a top p-module. By Lemma 2.8, we have SI(C (LAT (R M))) ⊆
Spec p (M). So, all the 1-1 correspondences in Theorem 2.6 hold for this special case. Behboodi
and Haddadi proved the second correspondence in [10, Corollary 3.6].
Example 2.10. Let R be a ring and R M a left topc-module (i.e. L = LAT (R M) is X -top, where
X = Specc (M)). If R M is completely distributive, then SI(C (L )) ⊆ X by [2, Proposition 5.19]
and the 1-1 correspondences of Theorem 2.6 hold. In [2, Proposition 5.22], these correspondences were proved under the additional condition that every coprime submodule of M is strongly
irreducible.
Example 2.11. Let R be a ring and R M a left tops-module (i.e. L = LAT (R M) is dual X -top,
where X = Specs (M)). By [2, Proposition 4.14], SH(H (L )) ⊆ X and so the 1-1 correspondences of Theorem 2.6 hold. These were proved in this special case in [2, Proposition 4.17]
under the additional condition that every second submodule of M is strongly hollow.
Example 2.12. Let R be a ring and R M a left top f p-module (i.e. L = LAT (R M) is X -top, where
X = Spec f p (M)). If R M is duo, then SI(C (L )) ⊆ X by [3, 3.30] and the 1-1 correspondences of
Theorem 2.6 hold. These were also obtained under the same condition in [3, Proposition 3.33].
Example 2.13. Let R be a ring and R M a left top f c -module (i.e. L = LAT (R M) is dual X top, where X = Spec f c (M)). If R M is duo, then SH(H (L)) ⊆ X by [4, Proposition 3.25] and
Proposition 1.22 and the 1-1 correspondences of Theorem 2.6 hold. These were also obtained
under the same condition for this special case in [4, Proposition 3.28].
Example 2.14. Let R be a ring and R M a left top f -module (i.e. L = LAT (R M) is dual X -top,
where X = Spec f (M)). If R M has the property that H(A) is first whenever A is irreducible, then
SH(H (L)) ⊆ X and so the 1-1 correspondences of Theorem 2.6 hold. This was proved under
the same condition in [1].
Example 2.15. Let R be a PID with an infinite number of non-zero prime ideals (e.g. R = Z),
L := Ideal(R), X = Max(R) and consider the topological space (X , τ ).
√
/ X and so X is
1. X = V (0) is irreducible since 0 is strongly irreducible. However, 0 = 0 ∈
not sober by Remark 2.2 (7), whence not spectral.
29
2. X is T1 as Max(X ) = X .
3. X is cofinite: consider a closed set 0/ 6= V (I) ( X , where I = (a) for some a ∈ R\{0}. Since
R is a PID, the unique prime factorization of a implies that I is contained in a finite number
of primes, i.e. V (I) is finite.
4. X is not regular, not T2 , and not normal. Observe that X is infinite and cofinite, so it does
not have disjoint non-empty open sets, although it has disjoint non-empty closed sets.
Example 2.16. Let R be a ring, M a left R-module, X ⊆ LAT (R M)\{M} (resp. X ⊆ LAT (R M)\{0})
and assume that L := LAT (R M) is X -top (resp. dual X -top). If C (L ) is uniform (resp. H (L )
is hollow), then (X , τ ) (resp. (X , τ 0 )) is connected by Theorem 2.3 (1).
Example 2.17. Let R be a commutative domain, L := Ideal(R), X ⊆ Ideal(R)\{R}
(resp. X ⊆
√
Ideal(R)\{0}), and assume that L is X -top (resp. L is dual X -top). If 0 = 0 (resp. ∑ p = R),
p∈X
Then (X , τ ) (resp.
(X , τ 0 ))
is connected.
Example 2.18. Let R be a UFR with zero devisors. Consider L := Ideal(R), X := Spec(R) (the
prime
(e.g. R = Zn [x] with n not prime). Notice
√
√spectrum of R) and assume that Min(X ) is infinite
T
q, but this is impossible as
that 0 = 0 (since Min(X ) is infinite, if 0 6= x ∈ 0 then x ∈
p∈Min(X)
R is a UFR).
• (X , τ ) is connected by Theorem 2.3 (7).
Claim: the intersection of any infinite collection of minimal elements of X is zero. SupT
pose that 0 6= I :=
q for some infinite subcollection m′ of Min(R). For any x ∈ I\{0},
q∈m′
we have x = p1 · · · pn where p1 , · · · , pn are prime elements of R. Notice that p1 , · · · , pn ∈ I.
For every q ∈ m′ , we have q = (pi ) for some i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}, whence m′ is finite (a contradiction).
• (X , τ ) is reducible by Remark 2.2 (1). To prove this, suppose that (X , τ ) is irreducible
√ and
that√I ∩ J = 0√for some
J ≤ R.
J) = V (I) ∪ V (J) = V ( I) ∪
√ ideals I, √
√ Then√V (0) = V (I ∩√
V ( J) = V ( I ∩ J), whence
I
∩
J
=
0
=
0.
Since
0 ∈ SI(C (L )) (by Remark
√
√
2.2 (1)), it follows that I = I = 0 or J = J = 0, whence R is a domain, a contradiction.
Example 2.19. Let (G, +) be a group and set
L := {H | H E G is a normal subgroup of G},
X := {H | H E G is a finite normal subgroup of G}\{G}.
Notice that L = (L, ∩, +, G, 0) is a complete lattice endowed with
T
Ni .
i∈I
30
W
i∈I
Ni := ∑ Ni and
i∈I
V
i∈I
Ni :=
1. C (L) = X ∪ {G} as the intersection of any non-empty family of finite normal subgroups is
a finite normal subgroup.
2. SI(C (L )) ⊆ X and so all the 1-1 correspondences of Theorem 2.6 hold.
√
3. 0 = 0 ∈ X and so (X , τ cl ) is irreducible and connected (observe that {0} = X and {0} is
irreducible).
4. C (L ) satisfies the DCC but need not satisfy the ACC (e.g. a p-quasicyclic group [19]).
5. SI(C (L )) = X if and only if L is an X -top lattice.
6. If L is X -top, then the intersection of any nonzero elements in X is nonzero.
7. By Corollary 1.28: (X , τ cl ) is T1 ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is a singleton ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is T2 ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is
discrete.
8. Suppose that L is an X -top lattice and (X , τ cl ) is compact with each element in G having
a finite order. Then G is a finite p-group for some prime p. Indeed, since X is compact,
by Theorem 2.3 (5), G is finitely constructed. But G is the union of all proper cyclic
subgroups, say G = ∑ Hi . Then G = ∑ H j where F is a finite subset of I. Hence G is
i∈I
j∈F
finite. Consequently, the Prüfer group is not X -top (X is the set of all proper subgroups) as
it is infinite.
Example 2.20. Let (G, +) be a group, Z(G) the center of G and set
L := {H | H E G is a normal subgroup of G},
X := {H | H ≤ Z(G)}\{G}.
Notice that L = (L, ∩, +, G, 0) is a complete lattice with
W
i∈I
Ni := ∑ Ni and
i∈I
V
i∈I
Ni :=
T
Ni .
i∈I
1. C (L) = X ∪ {G} as the intersection of any non-empty family of subgroups of the center is
again in the center.
2. SI(C (L )) ⊆ X and so all correspondences of Theorem 2.6 hold.
√
3. 0 = 0 ∈ X and so (X , τ cl ) is irreducible and connected.
4. By Corollary 1.28: (X , τ cl ) is T1 ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is singleton ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is T2 ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is
discrete.
5. SI(C (L )) = X ⇔ L is X -top. Hence, if L is an X -top lattice, then the intersection of
any distinct nonzero subgroups in X is nonzero.
6. If G is finite, then (X , τ cl ) is spectral by Remark 1.41.
31
7. Suppose that L is an X -top lattice and (X , τ cl ) is compact with each element in G having
a finite order. Then G is a finite p-group for some prime p.
8. X is coatomic and Z(G) is the unique maximal element of X .
9. If L is X -top, then X is compact as X is coatomic and Max(X ) is finite (by Theorem 2.3
(3)).
Example 2.21. Let (G, +) be a group, Z(G) the center of G and set
L := {H | H E G is a normal subgroup of G},
X := {H | H ≤ Z(G) is finite }\{G}.
Notice that L = (L, ∩, +, G, 0) is a complete lattice with
W
Ni := ∑ Ni and
i∈I
i∈I
V
i∈I
Ni :=
T
Ni .
i∈I
1. C (L) = X ∪ {G} as the intersection of any non-empty family of finite subgroups of the
center is again finite and in the center.
2. SI(C (L )) ⊆ X and so all correspondences of Theorem 2.6 hold.
√
3. 0 = 0 ∈ X and so (X , τ cl ) is irreducible and connected.
4. By Corollary 1.28: (X , τ cl ) is T1 ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is singleton ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is T2 ⇔ (X , τ cl ) is
discrete.
5. SI(C (L )) = X ⇔ L is X -top. Hence, if L is an X -top lattice, then the intersection of any
distinct nonzero subgroups in X is nonzero and so X can only be {0} or a collection of psubgroups for some fixed prime p. Otherwise, H ∈ X has order pn qm l with primes p and q
not dividing l and so by the Sylow Theorem [19, Theorem 5.2] there is a Sylow p-subgroup
K1 of order pn and a Sylow q-subgroup K2 of order qm . By Lagrange’s Theorem [19,
Theorem 1.26], the order of their intersection must divide pn and qm and so the intersection
must be zero, whereas K1 and K2 are nonzero elements of X . The uniqueness of p is clear
also by Lagrange’s Theorem.
6. If G is finite, then (X , τ cl ) is spectral by Remark 1.41.
7. Suppose that L is an X -top lattice and (X , τ cl ) is compact with each element in G having
a finite order. Then G is a finite p-group for some prime p.
8. X is coatomic and Z(G) is the unique maximal element of X .
9. If L is X -top, then X is compact as X is coatomic and Max(X ) is finite (by Theorem 2.3
(3)).
32
References
[1] J. Abuhlail and Christian Lomp, On topological lattices and an application to module theory, Journal of Algebra and its Applications 15 (3), Article Number: 1650046 (2016). 2, 3,
5, 9, 12, 20, 22, 23, 28, 29
[2] J. Abuhlail, Zariski topologies for coprime and second submodules, Algebra Colloquium
22 (1), 47-72 (2015). 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 20, 27, 28, 29
[3] J. Abuhlail, A Zariski topology for modules, Comm. Algebra 39 (11), 4163-4182 (2011). 2,
3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 20, 27, 28, 29
[4] J. Abuhlail, A dual Zariski topology for modules, Topology and its Applications 158 (3)
(2011) 457-467. 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 20, 27, 29
[5] J. Abuhlail, A Zariski topology for bicomodules and corings, Applied Categorical Structures 16 (1-2), 13-28 (2008). 2
[6] J. Abuhlail, Fully coprime comodules and fully coprime corings, Applied Categorical Structures (Special Issue: Categorical Methods in Hopf Algebras) 14 (5-6), 379-409 (2006). 2
[7] J. Abuhlail and Christian Lomp, On the notion of strong irreducibility and its dual, Journal
of Algebra and its Applications, 12 (6), Article Number: 1350012 (2013). 2, 4
[8] S. Annin, Associated and attached Primes over Noncommutative Rings, Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of California at Berkeley (2002).
[9] M. Atiyah and I. Macdonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-London-Don Mills, Ont. (1969). 2
[10] M. Behboodi and M. R. Haddadi, Classical Zariski topology of modules and spectral
spaces, Int. Elec. J. Algebra 4, 104-130 (2008). 2, 6, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28, 29
[11] M. Behboodi and M. R. M. Haddadi, Classical Zariski topology of modules and spectral
spaces, II, Int. Elec. J. Algebra 4, 131-148 (2008). 2, 15, 16, 17, 20
[12] N. Bourbaki, General Topology, Part I, Addison-Wesley (1966). 6
[13] J. Dauns, Prime modules, J. Rein. Ang. Math. 298, 165-181 (1978). 12
[14] G. Gratzer, Lattice Theory: Foundations, Birkhäuser (2010). 3
[15] M. Hochster, Prime ideal structure in commutative rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 142,
43-60 (1969). 3, 14
[16] R. L. McCasland and P. F. Smith, Zariski spaces of modules over arbitrary rings, Comm.
Algebra 34 (11), 3961-3973 (2006). 2
33
[17] R. McCasland, M. Moore and P. Smith, On the spectrum of a module over a commutative
ring, Comm. Algebra 25, 79-103 (1997). 2
[18] J. Munkres, Topology: A First Course, second edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River,
NJ07458. (2000). 11
[19] J. S. Milne, Group Theory, (2013). 31, 32
[20] S. Yassemi, The dual notion of prime submodules, Arch. Math. (Brno) 37 273-278 (2001).
[21] I. Wijayanti, Coprime modules and comodules, Ph.D. Dissertation, Heinrich-Heine Universität, Düsseldorf (2006). 2
[22] R. Wisbauer, Foundations of Module and Ring Theory. A Handbook for Study and Research,
CRC Press, (1991).
34
| 0math.AC
|
Comprehending Real Numbers: Development of Bengali
Real Number Speech Corpus
Md Mahadi Hasan Nahid*,1 , Md. Ashraful Islam *,2 , Bishwajit Purkaystha*,2 ,
and Md Saiful Islam*,1
arXiv:1803.10136v1 [eess.AS] 27 Mar 2018
*
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet-3114.
*,1
{nahid-cse,saiful-cse}@sust.edu
*,2
{ashrafulcse.sust, bishwa420}@gmail.com
Abstract
Speech recognition has received a less attention in Bengali literature due to the lack
of a comprehensive dataset. In this paper, we describe the development process of the
first comprehensive Bengali speech dataset on real numbers. It comprehends all the
possible words that may arise in uttering any Bengali real number. The corpus has ten
speakers from the different regions of Bengali native people. It comprises of more than
two thousands of speech samples in a total duration of closed to four hours. We also
provide a deep analysis of our corpus, highlight some of the notable features of it, and
finally evaluate the performances of two of the notable Bengali speech recognizers on it.
1
Introductions
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) capability of machines is very important as it reduces
the cost of communication between humans and machines. The recent resurgence in ASR [1, 2]
is significant and due to the large recurrent neural networks [3]. The neural networks are most
useful when they have large datasets. The improvement in automatic speech recognition is not
reflected in Bengali literature. This is due to a lack of comprehensive corpus in the literature.
There are few corpora in the literature [4], but they are not comprehensive, meaning that they
do not encompass all the possible words in a specific portion of the literature. In this paper, we
address this issue by describing the development of a Bengali speech corpus which encompasses
all possible words that may appear in a Bengali real number. We call our corpus “Bengali real
number speech corpus”.
This corpus was developed to cover all the words that could possibly involve in any Bengali
real number. The corpus comprises the speeches of several Bengali native speakers from different
regions. The summary of our corpus is given in Table 1. One of the limitations of our corpus is
that its speakers are all male speakers and the standard deviation in the ages of the speakers is
relatively small. The vocabulary of the corpus, mentioned in Table 1, contains all the Bengali
numbers from zero to hundred. Each number from zero to hundred in Bengali is uttered in
a singular way, except for the number ‘45’. It is uttered as both ‘/p/o/y/t/a/l/l/i/sh’ and
‘/p/o/y/ch/o/l/l/i/sh’. Therefore, 102 words in our vocabulary stand for number 0 to number
1
Table 1: Bengali real number audio corpus summary
Number of speakers
Age range
Number of speech samples
Duration
Vocabulary size
Number of distinct phonemes
Average number of words per sample
10
20-23 years
2302 samples
3.79 hours
115 words
30
≈ 8 words
Table 2: Special twelve words
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Bengali word English correspondence
One hundred
Two hundred
Three hundred
Four hundred
Five hundred
Six hundred
Seven hundred
Eight hundred
Nine hundred
Thousand
Lakh
Crore
Decimal
Bengali utterance
ekSho
duiSho
tinSho
charSho
pachSho
choySho
satSho
aTSho
noySho
hajar
lokSho
koTi
doShomik
100. The details about the rest of twelve words are given in Table 2. All the words involved in
uttering any Bengali real number fall to either the category of first 102 words or to the category
of the words mentioned in Table 2.
The main motivation behind this work was to develop a balanced corpus, meaning that
all unique words would occur with more or less an equal probability. This will be useful for
any learning method modeling the speech samples, but this may be a shortcoming in terms
of representing the actual prior probabilities of occurring the individual words. The prior
probabilities were not considered because we did not have any authentic information about
them.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe how we have developed
the corpus. In the same section we also describe some key features of our corpus. In the next
section, Section 3, we evaluate two methods of automatic speech recognition on our corpus.
And finally, in Section 4, we draw the conclusion to our paper.
2
Development of Bengali Real Number Speech Dataset
In this section, we give a detailed description of our development process and some key features
of it.
2
2.1
Data Preparation
We developed the corpus in two steps. At first, we had to decide what real numbers should
be present in the dataset. Therefore, we generated individual random strings containing the
Bengali real numbers. We had also generated some strings that did not contain the real numbers, rather, they only contained sequences of numbers (like, “One Two Three ... Ten”). The
algorithm of generating the strings is given in Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 1 String generation algorithm
1: procedure StringGeneration
2:
w1 ← list of each word for numbers from 0 to 99
. size = 101
3:
w2 ← list of each word for numbers {100,200,300, ..., 900}
. size = 9
,
,
}
. {hundred, thousand, lakh, crore}
4:
w3 ← { ,
5:
w4 ← {
}
. {decimal}
6:
N ← total number of strings to generate
7:
counter ← 0
8:
S ← {}
. final set of generated strings to return
9:
loop outer :
10:
L ← rand(2, 4)
. a random integer in range [2,4]
11:
L←L×2
. the string will have 4 to 8 words
12:
i←0
13:
s ← “”
. generated string in this iteration
14:
loop inner :
15:
i←i+2
16:
r1 ← rand(1, 14)
17:
if r1 > 1 then
18:
s ← s + w1 [rand(1, len(w1 ))]
19:
else
20:
s ← s + w2 [rand(1, len(w2 ))]
21:
end if
22:
r2 ← rand(1, 7)
23:
if r2 ≤ 6 or i = L then
. the utterance should not end in ‘decimal’
24:
s ← s + w3 [rand(1, len(w3 ))]
25:
else
26:
s ← s + w4 [rand(1, len(w4 ))]
27:
end if
28:
if i < L then
29:
goto loop inner
30:
add s to S
31:
counter ← counter + 1
32:
if counter < N then
33:
goto loop outer
34:
end if
35:
return S
In the algorithm, we made two clusters (i.e., {w1 , w2 } and {w3 , w4 }) to comprehend all the
words in the vocabulary. We constricted the length of the strings to be either four, or six,
or eight. A string can be logically split into a number of groups (depending on the length of
the string) where each group has exactly two words. The first word comes from either w1 or
w2 and the last word comes from either w3 or w4 . This reflects the real world scenario. The
3
word ‘decimal’ does not appear as the final word in the sentence, so we have restricted it from
appearing as the final word in line number 23 in the algorithm. Thus, we have generated the
strings for our corpus. All the generated strings are grammatically valid, but still, there can
be a very few strings which are semantically invalid. For example, a semantically invalid string
’. For such strings, we have also incorporated them in our corpus
may be like: ‘
as these strings should not impede the learning process of a recognizer.
After generating the strings, a set of different recording environments was set. This included
lab rooms, class rooms, closed rooms, and etc. The noise in the environment was kept to a
minimum level. The volunteers were given the scripts (which contained the randomly generated
strings) and were asked to read out in front of a microphone. Their speeches were recorded
and filtered using a band-pass filter with the cutoff frequencies 300 Hz and 3 KHz. Finally, we
stored the filtered speech samples in “.wav” file format with the original bit rate of 256 kbps.
A sample speech, in its final representation, is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Contents of file speaker 1 1.wav
2.2
2.2.1
Data Organization
Transcripts of the Speech Samples
Although we have mentioned before that we had not taken actual prior probabilities into
account, but still we made sure that any impossible combination of the words does not occur.
never occurs at the beginning of any speech sample throughout the
For example, the word
corpus. Figure 2 shows a snapshot of the contents of text-data.txt file of the corpus. This file
Figure 2: Transcript file: text-data.txt
contains transcripts of all the speech samples. Each line contains the transcript of one speech
sample. Each line has mainly two important parts. The actual content contained in the audio
file is transcribed within the <s></s> tag as shown in the figure. The second part contains a
unique identifier in the format: speaker {1-10} {1-}. The first two parts of the identifier in
this format describe whose voice it is (i.e., there are ten speakers in the corpus) whereas the
remaining part denotes the recorded file number of that speaker. For example, the second line
4
Table
Bengali word
COUShoTTi
Ek
Ekotrish
UnoShaT
choy
hajar
poyCollish
poytallish
teish
teppanno
3: Mapping of the words to the phonemes
Corresponding phonemes English correspondence
C OU SH O T T I
64
EK
1
E K O T R I SH
31
U N O SH A T
59
CH O Y
6
HAJAR
Thousand
P OY C O L L I SH
45
P OY T A L L I SH
45
T E I SH
23
TEPPANNO
53
of Figure 2 transcribes the speech (of the first speaker) contained in the seventeenth file. This
text file may be used as the labels for the speech samples.
2.2.2
Dictionary of Words to Phonemes
Individual words (i.e., 115 unique words) were mapped to a set of phonemes according to the
rules prescribed in a file “asr avro.dic”. These rules follow the popular avro phonetic method.
We recognized thirty individual Bengali phonemes which were necessary for constructing individual words in the speech samples. A few examples from the dictionary of matches of the
individual words to their corresponding phonemes are given in Table 3.
This phoneme list is only a supplementary to our data corpus; one can have their own list of
phonemes to interpret the sentences corresponding to the speech samples. In our interpretation
of the phonemes, the data corpus contains a total of 126,776 phonemes. The frequency of each
of the phonemes is given in Table 4.
2.2.3
Organization of the Audio Samples
The speech samples are organized into an appropriate structure. Each speech sample is under
a directory whose name is the unique identifier for that speaker. In other words, each speaker
has a dedicated directory for all the speech samples attributed to him. The audio files have
an “.wav” extension. For example, the twenty first speech sample of the fifth speaker has the
name “speaker 5 21.wav”. The information about the speech contained in the sample is in
“text-data.txt” file as described in Section 2.2.1.
2.3
Characteristics of the Data Corpus
In this section, we discuss some of the important characteristics of the corpus which provide a
more important insight to the dataset. The dataset has 2302 examples, and 17,582 words in
total. The transcripts to all the speech samples span 155,908 characters (without the spaces).
Our data corpus has more longer words (i.e., the words that have seven or more characters
comprise 36% of the whole dataset) as compared to the shorter words (i.e., the words that have
three or less characters comprise 24% of the whole dataset).
Interestingly, no real number in Bengali language utters phonemes ‘M’, ‘BH’, ‘GH’, ‘PH’ (or
‘F’). This is the reason why these phonemes have not appeared in Table 4. Another observation
is that there is a significant amount of disproportions in the frequencies of phonemes (e.g., the
5
Table 4: The phoneme list and their frequency in the corpus
Phonemes Occurrences Normalized frequency (%)
A
13,943
10.80
AI
193
0.15
4,452
3.51
B
C
3,228
2.55
CH
950
0.75
D
491
0.39
7,238
5.71
E
419
0.33
G
12,212
9.62
H
I
8,603
6.76
J
1,716
1.35
4,931
3.89
K
KH
1,644
1.30
3,715
2.93
L
4,477
3.53
N
NG
307
0.24
O
11,546
9.11
1,357
1.07
OI
OU
344
0.27
623
0.49
OY
P
4,078
3.22
R
7,740
6.11
S
8,235
6.50
SH
9,152
7.22
11,646
9.19
T
TH
205
0.16
U
2,031
1.60
Y
623
0.49
YA
870
0.69
6
phoneme ‘A’ has a normalized frequency 10.8% while the phoneme ‘AI’ has 0.15%). This is a
limitation of our data corpus, and therefore, any method that would train on this dataset has
to pay a significant attention to this discrepancy. As we were not biased to any phoneme while
building the dataset, yet such disproportions arose, it can be inferred that the disproportions
of the phonemes exist in the language itself.
3
Two Speech Recognizers
Figure 3: Error rates incurred by CMU-Sphinx4 model with the respect to different durations
of the corpus. The word error rates are smaller as compared to the sentence error rate because
of shorter length dependency modeling.
In this section, we describe the findings of the experiments undergone with two Bengali
speech recognizers [5, 6]. These two recognizers had been developed for recognizing Bengali
real numbers. The ideas and methods of these two recognizers are very different.
To analyze and evaluate these two recognizers we need two types of error metrics; the first
one is the word detection error rate (Ew ) and the second one is the phoneme detection error
rate (Ep ). In our experiment we define them as follows:
#mismatches in phonemes
#total phonemes
#mismatches in words
Ew =
#total words
Ep =
(1)
(2)
The first recognizer uses a popular recognizer CMU Sphinx 4 [7] which employs a hidden
markov model (HMM). This model has been trained on our corpus with different durations of
the dataset and the error rates are shown in Figure 3. These error rates are incurred when the
7
training and the test data are the same. Finally, with different training and test data (with
a 80:20 ratio for training and test purposes respectively) this model incurs a 15% word error
rate.
Figure 4: The LSTM model’s learning process with respect to the length of training period.
The second recognizer tries to recognize the speech samples by dividing them into a number
of frames. It is actually a bidirectional long short term memory (LSTM) (a recurrent neural
network) that does sequence learning, and has a post-processing algorithm to produce a final
output. However, it can only recognize the individual words, not the entire sentence. The
hourly training progression is given in Figure 4. In this figure, the error rates in individual
phonemes are also given. The word detection error rate improves after the initial couple of
hours because of the post-processing algorithm. Finally, the recognizer incurred a 13.2% word
detection error rate and a 29% phoneme detection error rate.
4
Conclusion
In this paper, we described the development of Bengali real number audio corpus that comprises
of all possible words involving any Bengali real number. The major contribution of our corpus
is that it comprehends a great combination of Bengali real numbers. We also provided a
brief analysis of our corpus and highlighted some of the key features of it. We have also
performed experiments with two methods on our corpus and evaluated their performances. On
a future note, we would like to extend our corpus with more combinations of words, and with
an increased and balanced number of male and female speakers.
References
[1] Chan, W., Jaitly, N., Le, Q., & Vinyals, O. (2016, March). Listen, attend and spell: A
neural network for large vocabulary conversational speech recognition. In Acoustics, Speech
8
and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2016 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 4960-4964).
IEEE.
[2] Graves, A., & Jaitly, N. (2014, January). Towards end-to-end speech recognition with
recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 17641772).
[3] Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., & Vinyals, O. (2014). Recurrent neural network regularization.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.2329.
[4] Alam, F., Habib, S. M., Sultana, D. A., & Khan, M. (2010). Development of annotated Bangla speech corpora. In Spoken Languages Technologies for Under-Resourced
Languages.
[5] Nahid, M. M. H., Islam, M. A., & Islam, M. S. (2016, May). A noble approach for recognizing Bangla real number automatically using CMU Sphinx4. In Informatics, Electronics
and Vision (ICIEV), 2016 5th International Conference on (pp. 844-849). IEEE.
[6] Nahid, M. M. H., Purkaystha, B., & Islam, M. S. (2017, December). Bengali speech recognition: A double layered LSTM-RNN approach. In Computer and Information Technology
(ICCIT), 2017 20th International Conference of (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[7] Walker, W., Lamere, P., Kwok, P., Raj, B., Singh, R., Gouvea, E., ... & Woelfel, J. (2004).
Sphinx-4: A flexible open source framework for speech recognition.
9
| 2cs.AI
|
Algebras of conjugacy classes related to
symmetric groups
arXiv:1604.05755v2 [math.GR] 19 Jan 2018
Yu.A.Neretin1
In 1999 V. Ivanov and S. Kerov observed that structure constants of algebras
of conjugacy classes of symmetric groups Sn admit a stabilization (in a non-obvious
sense) as n → ∞. We extend their construction to a class of pairs of groups G ⊃ K
and algebras of conjugacy classes of G with respect to K. In our basic example G is
a product of symmetric groups, G = Sn × Sn , K is the diagonal subgroup Sn .
1
Introduction
1.1. Notation. 1) Denote by #A the number of elements of a set A. Denote
by Jn the set
Jn = {1, 2, . . . , n} ⊂ N.
Let Y be a finite or countable set. Denote by S(Y ) the group of all finitely
supported permutations of Y . By Sn we denote the group of permutations of
Jn , by S∞ the group S(N). We regard groups Sn as subgroups in S∞ .
2) Let G be a group, K ⊂ G a subgroup. Denote by K \ G/K the set of
double cosets of G with respect to K, i.e., the quotient of G with respect to the
equivalence relation
g ∼ h1 gh2 ,
where g ∈ G, h1 , h2 ∈ K.
Denote by G//K the set of conjugacy classes of G with respect to K, i.e., the
quotient of G with respect to the equivalence relation
g ∼ hgh−1 ,
where g ∈ G, h ∈ H.
e consisting of elements (h, h) ∈
Consider the group G×K and the subgroup K
G × K, where h ranges in K. We have a canonical identification
e \ (G × K)/K
e ≃ G//K.
K
Indeed, let (g, h) ∈ G × K. The corresponding double coset contains
(g, h)(h−1 , h−1 ) = (gh−1 , 1)
and also all elements of the form
1 Supported
(r, r)(gh−1 , 1)(r−1 , r−1 ) = r(gh−1 )r−1 , 1 .
by the grant FWF, P28421.
1
For a group G consider its multiples G(m) = G × · · · × G (m times), let
diag(G) = diagm (G) ⊂ G(n) denote the diagonal, i.e., the set of all tuples
(g, . . . , g) ∈ G(m) . We have obvious identifications
diag2 (G) \ (G × G)/ diag2 (G) ≃ G//G;
diag3 (G) \ (G × G × G)/ diag3 (G) ≃ (G × G)// diag2 (G),
etc.
3) For a finite group G denote by C(G) the group algebra of G, we denote
the convolution by ∗. For f ∈ C(G) denote by f ⋆ the function
f ⋆ (g) := f (g −1 ).
Clearly f → f ⋆ is an anti-involution of the group algebra
(f1 ∗ f2 )⋆ = f2⋆ ∗ f1⋆ ,
(f ⋆ )⋆ = f.
Denote by C(K \ G/K) (resp. C(G//K)) the subalgebras of the group algebra consisting of functions that are constant on double cosets (resp. conjugacy
classes), these subalgebras are closed with respect to the anti-involution.
e be as above. We have an obvious isomorphism
Let K
e \ (G × K)/K
e ,
C(G//K) ≃ C K
i.e., convolution algebras of conjugacy classes are special cases of algebras of
double cosets.
1.2. Bibliographical remarks on algebras of double cosets and their
infinite-dimensional degenerations. Formally, this subsection is not necessary, however here we explain origins and purposes of this work.
Let ρ be a unitary representation of a finite group G in a space V , denote by
the same symbol ρ the corresponding representation of the group algebra. Denote by V K the subspace of all K-fixed vectors, by (V K )⊥ its orthocomplement.
The convolution algebra C(K \ G/K) acts in V = V K ⊕ (V K )⊥ by operators of
block form
′
ρ (f ) 0
ρ(f ) =
.
0
0
Thus for any representation ρ of G we have a representation ρ′ of C(K \ G/K)
in V K . It can be easily shown that if ρ is irreducible and V K 6= 0, then ρ′ ’remembers’ ρ. For this reason convolution algebras became tools of investigation
of representations. We recall some well-known examples.
1) Hecke algebras (Iwahori [11]). Let G be the group GL(n, Fq ) of all invertible matrices over a finite field Fq and K be the group of upper-triangular
matrices. These algebras admit relatively explicit descriptions and an interpolation in q (for q = 1 we get C(Sn )). They can live their own lives independently
of the group GL(n, Fq ), see, e.g., [3].
2
There are some widely explored examples of convolution algebras related to
locally compact groups (in this case K must be compact).
2) Let G be a reductive Lie group and K its maximal compact subgroup.
Algebras C(K \ G/K) were widely explored in classical representation theory of
Lie groups at least after Gelfand [6], notice that even C SO(2)\SL(2, R)/SO(2)
is a nontrivial object, see, e.g., [13].
3) Affine Hecke algebras (Iwahori, Matsumoto [12]). Let Qp be a p-adic field,
Op be the ring of p-adic integers. Let G be the group GL(n, Qp ), and K be the
Iwahori subgroup. Recall that the Iwahori subgroup is a subgroup on GL(n, Op )
consisting of matrices whose elements under the diagonal are contained in pOp .
Such algebras C(K \ G/K) also admit an interpolation in p and can live their
own lives.
These examples have extensions, however in all these cases subgroups K are
quite large in G, for smaller subgroups algebras of double cosets usually seem
to be too complicated.
It appears that for infinite-dimensional groups double coset spaces K \ G/K
often admit a natural structure of a semigroup, and for each unitary representation of G this semigroup acts in the subspace of K-fixed vectors. First
example of such semigroup was discovered by Ismagilov in [9]. Many cases were
examined by Olshansky [20], [21], he showed that semigroups K \ G/K allow
explicit descriptions in some cases when their finite-dimensional counterparts
seem non-handable. In [15] it was observed that existence of such semigroup
structures is a relatively general phenomenon. In [16]–[19], [4] descriptions of
such semigroups were proposed on a quite general setting.
One of basic examples in [18] was
G = S∞ × S∞ × S∞
and K being a subgroup in the diagonal S∞ fixing points 1, 2, . . . , α ∈ N.
The present paper is an attempt to look from infinity to finite objects. We
present a kind of description (or quasi-description) of a family of convolution
semigroups related to symmetric groups, our basic example is
C diag3 (Sn ) \ (Sn × Sn × Sn )/ diag3 (Sn ) ≃ C (Sn × Sn )// diag2 (Sn ) .
We use arguments of Ivanov and Kerov [10] who observed that the algebras
C(Sn //Sn ) admit a stabilization (in a non-obvious sense) as n → ∞.
1.3. Conjugacy classes of Sj × Sj with respect to the diagonal.
Denote
Gj := Sj × Sj ,
Kj := diag2 (Sj ).
For
g, h, r, . . . ∈
∞
a
j=0
3
Gj
denote by
g, h, r, ...∈
∞
a
Gj //Kj
j=0
the corresponding conjugacy classes.
Let j 6 N and g ∈ Gj . Denote by ge the corresponding element of GN ⊃ Gj .
We define an element AN [ g ] of C(GN //KN ) by the formula
X
1
τ −1 e
gτ.
(N − j)!
AN [ g ] :=
τ ∈KN
If j > N and g ∈ Gj , we set
AN [ g ] := 0.
Thus for each N we get a family of elements of C(GN //KN ).
Remarks. 1) Notice that elements AN [ g ], where g ranges in GN //KN ,
form a basis in C(GN //GN ). However, if g ∈ GN actually is an element of a
subgroup Gk , our family contains also elements
1
AN [g],
1!
1
AN [g], . . . ,
2!
1
AN [g].
(N − k)!
`N
2) Elements AN [ g ], where g ranges in j=0 Gj //Kj , do not generate the
Abelian group Z(GN //KN ) of Z-valued functions on GN //KN .
⊠
Theorem 1.1 Let g , h , r range in the disjoint union
there are non-negative integers a r
g,h
`∞
j=0
Gj //Kj . Then
, which do not depend on N , satisfying the
following properties:
• For each N
AN [ g ] ∗ AN [ h ] =
X
ar
g,h
AN [ r ].
(1.1)
r
• Consider a linear space B with a basis consisting of symbols A[ g ], where
`∞
g ranges in j=0 Gj //Kj . Then the formula
A[ g ] ∗ A[ h ] =
X
ar
g,h
A[ r ],
(1.2)
r
determines a structure of an associative algebra on B.
In the next subsection we present a description (or quasi-description) of this
algebra.
1.4. Checker triangulated surfaces and symmetric groups. We
say that a checker triangulated surface is a two-dimensional oriented closed
(generally, disconnected) surface (see Fig. 1) equipped with the following data:
4
17
−
−
+
−
+
−
+
−
+
−
−
+
1 1
+ −
−
+
+
−
− +
9 9
−
+
+
+
17
23
−
−
7 7
− +
+ −
4 4
+
23
a)
b)
Figure 1: a) A piece of a checker triangulated surface.
b) A piece of a labeled checker triangulated surface.
Figure 2: A surface consisting of two triangles.
5
+
R
Q
Figure 3: Surfaces R, Q and a partial bijection R− to Q+ .
6
• a graph separating surface into triangles;
• for each triangle we assign a sign (+) or (−), pluses and minuses are
arranged in a checker order;
• edges are colored by red, yellow, blue; colors of edges of each face are
different; in plus-triangles these colors are located clockwise, on minus-triangles
anti-clockwise.
We admit non-connected surfaces. Also, we admit pairs of triangles, which
have two or three common edges as on Fig. 2.
Surfaces are defined up to a combinatorial equivalence. Denote by ΞN the
set of all checker triangulated surfaces with 2N faces.
We say that a labeling of a surface R ∈ ΞN is a bijective map from {1, 2, . . . , N }
to the set of all plus-triangles. We automatically assign labels to minus-triangles
en
assuming that triangles separated by blue edges have same labels. Denote by Ξ
the set of all labeled surfaces with 2N triangles defined up to a combinatorial
equivalence2 .
There is a natural one-to-one correspondence between the set ΞN and the
group GN = SN × SN .
e For each red edge v we consider labels
Indeed, fix a labeled checker surface R.
i+ (v) and i− (v) on its plus and minus sides. Assuming σred : i+ (v) 7→ i− (v)
we get an element σred of SN . Considering yellow edges we obtain another
permutation σyellow ∈ SN .
A permutation τ ∈ SN of labels corresponds to a simultaneous conjugation
(σred , σyellow ) 7→ (τ σred τ −1 , τ σyellow τ −1 ).
Therefore we get a canonical bijection between sets ΞN and (SN × SN )//SN .
Next, let us describe a product in SN × SN in terms of labeled surfaces.
e and R
e be labeled surfaces. For each j = 1, . . . , N , we identify the
Let P
e with the j-th plus-triangle of P according colors of
j-th minus-triangle of R
their sides. Thus we get a two-dimensional simplicial cell complex consisting of
N labeled plus-triangles inherited from R, labeled N minus-triangles inherited
from P and N plus-minus-triangles obtained as result of gluing. Each edge is
contained in 3 triangles. Removing interiors of all plus-minus-triangles we come
to a simplicial cell complex such that each edge is contained in two triangles.
In fact, this is a surface, but some vertices of the surface can be glued one with
another (see Fig. 4). Cutting all such gluings we get a new labeled surface.
1.5. Remark. Belyi data. Checker triangulated surfaces arise in a natural
way in algebraic geometry under names Belyi data or dessigns d’enfant.
Denote by Q the field of algebraic numbers. Consider an algebraic curve
C and a meromorphic function (Belyi function) f on C whose critical values
are contained in the set 0, 1, ∞. According the famous Belyi theorem [2] such
a function on a given curve C exists if and only if C can be determined by a
system of algebraic equations with coefficients in Q.
2 If a surface R admits combinatorial automorphisms, then different labelings of R can give
equivalent labeled surfaces.
7
Figure 4: A surface whose vertices are glued.
Consider the Riemann sphere C = C ∪ ∞ and the real projective line R =
R ∪ ∞ in C. Let us say that the upper half-plane is a plus-triangle, lower halfplane is a minus-triangle, the segment [1, ∞] is red, the segment [0, 1] is yellow,
and the segment [−∞, 0] is blue. Thus the Riemann sphere C becomes a checker
triangulated surface. The preimage of R on C is colored graph splitting C into
triangles. Clearly, we come to a checker triangulated surface.
The Galois group of Q over Q acts on the set of all Belyi functions. A. Grothendieck proposed a program of investigation of the Galois groups using Belyi
functions and graphs on surfaces, see, e.g., [23], [24], [25], [7], [22].
Relations of this topic and infinite symmetric group remain to be non-clear.
1.6. Partial bijections. We say that a partial bijection λ of a set Y to a
set Z is a bijection of a subset A ⊂ Y to a subset B ⊂ Y (we admit the case
A = B = ∅). We define
rk λ := #A = #B,
dom λ := A,
im λ := B.
Denote by PB(Y, Z) the set of all partial bijections Y → Z.
For partial bijections µ : W → Y , λ : Y → Z we define their product
λµ : W → Z. We say that w ∈ dom λµ if w ∈ dom µ and µ(w) ∈ dom λ. In this
case we set λµ(w) = λ(µ(w))
1.7. Construction of the algebra B. The basis of the algebra is numer-
8
ated by the set
∞
a
Ξn .
n=0
Let R ∈ Ξn , Q ∈ Ξk . Let λ be a partial bijection from the set of minustriangles of R to`the set of plus-triangles of Q (see Fig. 3). Consider the
disjoint union R Q and let us perform the following transformations. For
each face A ∈ dom λ, we take the face λ(A) ∈ im λ, remove both faces and
identify their boundaries according colors of edges. After this, we get a compact
two-dimensional simplicial complex, and each edge of the complex is contained
in precisely two faces. As above some vertices of the surface can be glued one
with another (see Fig. 4). Cutting all such gluings we get a new surface
R ⊛λ Q.
In this notation, the product is defined by
X
R ⊛λ Q.
R∗Q=
λ∈PB(R− ,Q+ )
Proposition 1.2 This algebra coincides with the algebra B defined in Theorem
1.1.
2
A more general construction
2.1. Groups Gn . Fix a finite set I. Consider a finite or countable set3 X, the
product I × N and the unions
V = X ∪ (I × N),
Vn = X ∪ (I × Jn ) ⊂ V,
see Fig. 5. The group S∞ acts on N, therefore it acts on the product I × N.
We can imagine I × N as a table with #I infinite rows. The group S∞ acts by
permutations of columns.
Next, we consider the trivial action of S∞ on X, this determines an action
of S∞ the whole V .
Consider a subgroup G∞ ⊂ S(V ) containing S∞ . Set
Gn := G∞ ∩ S(Vn ).
In other words, we consider elements of G supported by Vn . As above, we denote
Kn := Sn ,
K ∞ = S∞ .
Remark. The case discussed above corresponds to X = ∅ and a 2-element
set I. The group G∞ = S∞ × S∞ acts by permutations preserving rows.
⊠
3 The
case X = ∅ is sufficiently interesting.
9
Vn
...
I
Figure 5: Sets V ⊃ Vn .
Remark. It is reasonable to keep in the mind the following examples:
a) X = ∅, G = S(I × N).
b) More generally, let X = ∅, G = S∞ × · · · × S∞ , its subgroup S∞ is the
diagonal.
c) X is a finite set, #I = 1, G = S(X ∪ N).
In all these cases the sets of conjugacy classes admit geometric descriptions
by tricks of [18].
⊠
`∞
2.2. Algebras C(Gn //Kn). Let g , h , r , . . . range in j=0 Gj //Kj .
Denote by g, h, r their representatives.
Fix n = 0, 1, 2, . . . , let g ∈ Gn //Kn , g ∈ g , and N > n. For any n-element
set Ω ⊂ N we define the sum
X
R(g, Ω) :=
σgσ −1 ∈ C(G∞ ),
σ:Jn →Ω
where σ ranges in the set of bijective maps Jn → Ω. Explain this more carefully.
Any σ determines a bijection I × Jn → I × Ω, we denote it by the same symbol
σ. Thus, σgσ −1 is a map
σgσ −1 : X ∪ (I × Ω) → X ∪ (I × Ω).
We extend it to a map VN → VN in a trivial way,
σgσ −1 (w) := w,
if w ∈ I × (JN \ Ω).
Next, we consider the sum
AN [ g ] =
X
R(g, Ω).
Ω⊂JN : #Ω=n
For N < n, we set AN [ g ] = 0.
Remark. Clearly, for N > n, we have
AN [ g ] =
X
1
τ gτ −1 .
(N − n)!
(2.1)
τ ∈KN
However, our long definition will be used below.
10
⊠
Theorem 2.1 For the groups Gn defined in this subsection Theorem 1.1 remains true.
Thus, for any group G∞ , we get an associative algebra B = B[G∞ //K∞ ] and
canonical epimorphisms B[G∞ //K∞ ] → C(GN //KN ).
2.3. Local bijections. Following Ivanov and Kerov [10] we define a semigroup of local bijections4 . Let Y be a finite or countable set. A local bijection
ω is a bijection from a finite subset Ω ⊂ Y to Ω. We denote such local bijection by ((ω, Ω)). Any local bijection admits a canonical extension to an element
ω
e ∈ S(Y ), we set ω
e y = y if y ∈
/ Ω. We define the product of local bijections by
((ω, Ω)) ◦ ((µ, M )) = ω
e·µ
e
,Ω∪ M .
Ω∪M
Denote by L(Y ) the semigroup of all local bijections of Y .
Remark. A local bijection determines a partial bijection. But the ◦-product
differs from the product of partial bijections.
⊠
The group S(Y ) acts on L(Y ) by conjugations in the obvious way,
σ((w, Ω))σ −1 = ((σ wσ
e −1
σΩ
, σΩ)).
On the other hand, we have a natural forgetting homomorphism
ι : L(Y ) → S(Y )
defined by
ι((ω, Ω)) = ω
e.
2.4. The semigroup algebra for local bijections. Denote by C[L(Y )]
the space of all formal series of the form
X
a((ω,Ω)) ((ω, Ω)),
a((ω,Ω)) ∈ C.
((ω,Ω))∈L(Y )
This space is equipped with a convolution
X
X
X
c((ν,N )) ((ν, N )),
b((µ,M)) ((µ, M )) =
a((ω,Ω)) ((ω, Ω)) ∗
((ν,N ))
((µ,M))
((ω,Ω))
where
c((ν,N )) =
X
a((ω,Ω)) b((µ,M))
((ωΩ)),((µM)): Ω∪M=N, ω
eµ
e=e
ν
(this sum is finite).
For any subset Z in Y we have a homomorphism
Y
πZ
: C[L(Y )] → C[L(Z)]
4 See
[1], [14] on continuations of the work [10].
11
defined on generators by
π((ω, Ω)) =
(
((ω, Ω)),
if Ω ⊂ Z;
0,
otherwise.
For a finite set Y we have a homomorphism of algebras
ι : C[L(Y )] → C[S(Y )]
defined by
X h
X
X
a((ω,Ω)) ω
e=
a((ω,Ω)) ((ω, Ω)) =
ι
((ω,Ω))
X
g∈S(Y ) Ω: Ω⊃{support of g}
((ω,Ω))
a
((g
,Ω))
Ω
i
g
(for an infinite set Y the sum in square brackets is infinite).
2.5. Elements B[ g ]. Let g ∈ Gn //Kn , g ∈ g . For any n-element subset
Ω ⊂ N we define an element of C[L(V )] by
X
R( g , Ω) =
σgσ −1 , X ∪ (I × Ω) ,
σ:Jn →Ω
where the summation is taken over all bijections σ : Jn → Ω.
Next, we define
X
R( g , Ω).
B[ g ] :=
Ω: #Ω=n
By construction these elements are invariant with respect to conjugations by
elements of K∞ ,
Example. Let G∞ = S∞ × S∞ acting on J2 × N as above. For g ∈
(SN × SN )//SN we take the corresponding R ∈ ΞN . Then
X
X
eκ ,
B[ g ] =
R
Ω⊂N: #Ω=N κ
where the summation in the interior sum is taken over all bijective maps κ from
Ω to the set of plus-triangles of R. A checker triangulated surface equipped
with such a map determines an element of the group S(Ω) × S(Ω). We consider
this element as a local bijection of J2 × N with domain J2 × Ω.
⊠
For any g ∈ Gn //Kn , h ∈ Gm //Km the convolution B[ g ] ∗ B[ h ] is K∞ invariant, therefore it has the form
X
a r B[ r ].
B[ g ] ∗ B[ h ] :=
r∈
`
g,h
Gj //Kj
2.6. Proof of the theorem. First, we apply the map πVVN . For any g and
n ∈ N we get an element
BN [ g ] := πVVN B[ g ].
12
Since πVVN is a homomorphism of algebras, we get
BN [ g ] ∗ BN [ h ] :=
r∈
`N
X
ar
g,h
BN [ r ],
k=0 Gj //Kj
`
where g, h range in N
k=0 Gk //Sk .
Next, we apply the forgetting map ι : C[L(Vn )] → C[S(Vn )] to elements
BN [ g ]. Evidently, we get
ι(BN [ g ]) = AN [ g ].
This implies our statement.
2.7. An expression for products. Let g ∈ Gn , h ∈ Gk . Let λ ranges
in partial bijections Jk → Jn . Fix λ, denote d = rk λ. Fix any pair of injective
maps σ0 : Jn → Jn+k−d , τ0 : Jk → Jn+k−d such that the product σ0−1 τ0 as
product partial bijections is λ. Define the conjugacy class
g ⊛λ h := σ0 ((g, Vn ))σ0−1 ◦ τ0 ((h, Vk ))τ0−1 ∈ Gn+k−d //Sn+k−d ,
it does not depend on the choice of σ0 and τ0 .
Proposition 2.2
X
B[ g ] ∗ B[ h ] =
B[g ⊛λ h].
(2.2)
λ∈PB(Jk ,Jn )
Proof. We expand the product B[ g ] ∗ B[ h ] by definition as a sum
X
X
σ((g, Vn ))σ −1 ◦ τ ((h, Vk ))τ −1 =
((σgσ −1 , σVn )) ◦ ((τ hτ −1 , τ Vk )), (2.3)
σ,τ
σ,τ
where σ : Jn → N, τ : Jk → N are injective maps. We wish to show that this
expansion coincides with (2.2). It is sufficient to identify the following sub-sum
of (2.3)
X
((σgσ −1 , σVn )) ◦ ((τ hτ −1 , τ Vk ))
(2.4)
σ,τ : σJn ∪τ Jk =Jn+k−d
and the sub-sum of (2.2) consisting of all summands of the form
((r, Vn+k−d )).
Notice that the group Sn+k−d acts on the set of summands of (2.4) by
u : (σ, τ ) 7→ (u−1 σ, u−1 τ ).
We refer to Fig. 6. This action corresponds to simultaneous application of a
substitution u to rows number 1, 4, 7. Rows 2, 3, 5, 6 remain to be fixed, and
13
τ −1
h
τ
σ −1
g
σ
Figure 6: The left part. A product σ((g, Vn )) σ −1 ◦ τ ((h, Vk )) τ −1 . Here k = 5,
n = 7, d = 3, n + k − d = 9. We draw 7 copies of the set Jn−k+1 . Maps τ −1 ,
τ , σ −1 , σ are shown by arcs. We mark σ dom λ = τ −1 im λ as fat points. Arcs
containing fat points are thick. Boxes correspond to elements ((h, Vk )) ∈ Gk and
((g, Vn )) ∈ Gn .
The right part. A canonical form of the pair (τ, σ).
14
arcs move corresponding permutations of their ends. Applying an appropriate
u can put fat points to positions 1, 2, . . . , d. Moreover, we can make τ −1 u
monotone on Jd :
i<j6d
τ −1 u(i) < τ −1 u(j).
⇒
(on Fig. 6 this means that the corresponding arcs have no intersections).
Next, we can put points of τ Jk \ τ Jd to points of Jk \ Jd . Moreover, we can
make τ −1 u monotone on Jk \ Jd . Finally, we can put points of σJn \ σJd to
points of Jn+k−d \ Jk . Moreover, we can make σ −1 u monotone on Jn+k−d \ Jk .
This determines u in a unique way. On the other hand, the partial bijection σ −1 τ does not change under this transformation, and the new pair
(u−1 σ, u−1 τ ) is uniquely determined by dom σ −1 τ , im σ −1 τ and the map σ −1 u :
Jd → im σ −1 τ .
Thus, we see that orbits of the group Sn+k−d on the set of summands of
(2.4) are enumerated by partial bijections λ.
3
Final remarks
3.1. The involution. The map g 7→ g −1 determines an anti-involution in the
algebra L[V ] and anti-involution in B[G∞ //K∞ ],
B[ g ]⋆ := B[g −1 ].
Evidently,
(B[ g ] ∗ B[ h ])⋆ = B[ h ]⋆ ∗ B[ g ]⋆ .
3.2. The filtration. Fix G∞ and set
B := B[G∞ //K∞ ].
Let Bn be the subspace in B generated by all
B[ g ],
where g ranges in
n
a
Gj //Sj .
j=0
We get an increasing filtration,
· · · ⊂ Bn ⊂ Bn+1 ⊂ . . .
Evidently,
V ∈ Bk ,
W ∈ Bl
⇒
V ∗ W ∈ Bk+l .
3.3. The associated graded algebra. We construct the graded algebra
gr B[G∞ //K∞ ] in the usual way. Namely, the product
Bk × Bl → Bk+l
15
determines a map
Bk /Bk−1 × Bl /Bl−1 → Bk+l /Bk+l−1 .
In this way, we get a structure of an associative algebra on
gr B[G∞ //K∞ ] =
∞
M
Bk /Bk−1 .
k=0
Each subspace Bk /Bk−1 has a natural basis enumerated by elements of Gk //Sk .
It is easy to describe the multiplication in gr B[G∞ //K∞ ]: in the sum in the
right-hand side of (2.2) we leave only the first summand (corresponding to the
partial bijection of rank 0).
Formulate this more precisely. For n, k ∈ Z+ denote by θn,k the partial
bijection Jn → Jn+k \ Jk defined by j 7→ j + k.
Proposition 3.1 a) For g ∈ Gn //Sn , h ∈ Gk //Sk , their product in graded
algebra gr B[G∞ //K∞ ] is
−1
◦ ((h, Vk ))].
B[ g ] ⋄ B[ h ] = B[θn,k ((g, Vn ))θn,k
b) If X = ∅, then the algebra gr B[G∞ //K∞ ] is commutative.
`∞
In fact, we get a semigroup structure on j=0 Gj //Sj given by
−1
g • h := θn,k ((g, Vn ))θn,k
◦ ((h, Vk )).
The algebra gr B[G∞ //K∞ ] is the semigroup algebra of this semigroup.
Example. For G∞ = S∞ × S∞ the •-product corresponds to the disjoint
union of checker triangulated surfaces.
⊠
Remark. These semigroups are similar to semigroups of double cosets,
which were considered in [18], [17]. However, degree of generality in [18] is wider
(as we noticed in Introduction, conjugacy classes are special cases of double
cosets and not vice versa), even in the same situations we get slightly different
structures. For instance, for G∞ = S∞ × S∞ adding to a checker triangulated
surface R ∈ Ξj a collection of k double triangles (drawn on Fig. 2) we get
different objects (this corresponds to embeddings Sj × Sj → Sk+j × Sk+j ).
However, such elements in [17] are identified. Notice that we have a natural
identification of sets
∞
a
Gj //Kj ≃ (G∞ //K∞ ) × Z+ ,
j=0
where Z+ denotes the set of non-negative integers. The left-hand side enumerates elements of the basis in B[G∞ //K∞ ]. The semigroup
G∞ //K∞ ≃ K∞ \ G∞ /K∞
16
is one of objects of [17].
⊠
3.4. The Poisson bracket. Let X = ∅, in particular, in this case
gr B[G∞ //K∞ ] is commutative. Consider the map
Bk × Bl → Bk+l−1
given by
(V, W ) 7→ [V, W ] = V ∗ W − W ∗ V.
As usual, we get a map
Bk /Bk−1 × Bl /Bl−1 → Bk+l−1 /Bk+l−2
and a structure of a Lie algebra on the space gr B[G∞ //K∞ ]. It is easy to write
a formula for the bracket
X
B[ g ], B[ h ] gr =
B[g ⊛λ h] − B[h ⊛λ−1 g] .
λ∈PB(Jk ,Jn ): rk λ=1
Of course, a partial bijection Jk → Jn of rank 1 is determined by a pair α ∈ Jk ,
β ∈ Jn .
Remark. Recall that there is a well-known Poisson structure on spaces
(K × · · · × K)// diag K, where K is a compact Lie group, see [8], [5].
⊠
References
[1] Alexeevski A. V., Natanzon S. M. Algebras of conjugacy classes of partial elements. In Topology, geometry, integrable systems and mathematical physics.
Novikov’s seminar: 2012–2014. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1-11 (2014).
[2] Belyi, G. V. Galois extensions of a maximal cyclotomic field. Math. USSRIzvestiya, 1980, 14:2, 247–256.
[3] Bump D. Lie groups. Second edition. Springer, New York, 2013.
[4] Gaifullin A. A., Neretin Yu. A., Infinite symmetric group, pseudomanifolds, and combinatorial cobordism-like structures. J. Topol. Anal., 2017,
https://doi.org/10.1142/S179352531850022X
[5] Fock, V. V., Rosly, A. A. Flat connections and polyubles. Theoret. and Math.
Phys. 95 (1993), no. 2, 526-534.
[6] Gelfand I. M., Spherical functions on Riemannian symmetric spaces. (Russian) Doklady, 70 (1950), 5-8.
[7] Girondo, E., González-Diez, G. Introduction to compact Riemann surfaces
and dessins d’enfants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
17
[8] Goldman, W. M. Invariant functions on Lie groups and Hamiltonian flows
of surface group representations. Invent. Math. 85 (1986), no. 2, 263-302.
[9] Ismagilov R. S., Elementary spherical functions on the group SL(2, P ) over a
field P , which is not locally compact, with respect to the subgroup of matrices
with integral elements, Math. USSR-Izv., 1:2 (1967), 349-380.
[10] Ivanov V., Kerov S., The Algebra of Conjugacy Classes in Symmetric
Groups and Partial Permutations, Zapiski nauchn.semin. POMI RAN, 256
(1999), 95–120; J. of Math. Sci. (New York), 2001, 107:5, 4212-4230.
[11] Iwahori N., On the structure of a Hecke ring of a Chevalley group over a
finite field., J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. I, 10 (1964), 215-236.
[12] Iwahori N., Matsumoto H., On some Bruhat decomposition and the structure of the Hecke rings of p-adic Chevalley groups, Inst. Hautes Études Sci.
Publ. Math., 25:1 (1965), 5-48.
[13] Koornwinder T. H., Jacobi functions and analysis on noncompact semisimple Lie groups, in Special Functions: Group Theoretical Aspects and Applications, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, 1-85.
[14] Mironov A., Morozov A., Natanzon, S. Infinite-dimensional topological field
theories from Hurwitz numbers. J. Knot Theory Ramifications 23, No. 6,
Article ID 1450033, 16 p. (2014).
[15] Neretin Yu.A. Categories of symmetries and infinite-dimensional groups.
Oxford University Press, 1996.
[16] Neretin Yu. A. , Multi-operator colligations and multivariate characteristic
functions, Anal. Math. Phys., 1:2-3 (2011), 121-138.
[17] Neretin Yu. A., Infinite tri-symmetric group, multiplication of double cosets,
and checker topological field theories. Int. Math. Res. Not., 2012:3 (2012),
501-523.
[18] Neretin Yu.A., Infinite symmetric groups and combinatorial constructions
of topological field theory type. Russ. Math. Surv., 2015, 70:4, 715-773.
[19] Neretin Yu. A., Multiplication of conjugacy classes, colligations, and characteristic functions of matrix argument, Funct. Anal. Appl., 51:2 (2017),
98-111.
[20] Olshanski G. I., Unitary representations of infinite dimensional pairs
(G, K) and the formalism of R. Howe, in Representation of Lie groups and
related topics, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math., 7, Gordon and Breach, New
York, 1990, 269-463.
[21] Olshanski G. I., Unitary representations of (G, K)-pairs that are connected
with the infinite symmetric group S(∞). Leningrad Math. J., 1:4 (1990),
983-1014.
18
[22] Shabat G. , Calculating and drawing Belyi pairs. Zapiski nauchn. semin.
POMI RAN 446, 2016, 182-220; also, J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.) 226 (2017), no. 5,
667-693.
[23] Shabat, G. B., Voevodsky, V. A. Drawing curves over number fields. in
The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. III, 199-227, Birkhäuser, Boston, Boston,
MA, 1990.
[24] Schneps L. (ed.), The Grothendieck theory of dessins d’enfants. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
[25] Schneps L., Lochak L. (eds.) Geometric Galois actions. V. 1, 2. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
Math.Dept., University of Vienna,
Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090 Wien;
& Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics (Moscow);
& Mech.Math.Dept., Moscow State University;
Institute for information transmission problems (Moscow);
e-mail: neretin(at) mccme.ru
URL:www.mat.univie.ac.at/∼neretin
19
| 4math.GR
|
arXiv:1504.08196v3 [cs.SY] 19 May 2016
On the estimation of initial conditions
in kernel-based system identification
Riccardo S. Risuleo, Giulio Bottegal and Håkan Hjalmarsson
∗
May 20, 2016
Abstract
Recent developments in system identification have brought attention
to regularized kernel-based methods, where, adopting the recently introduced stable spline kernel, prior information on the unknown process
is enforced. This reduces the variance of the estimates and thus makes
kernel-based methods particularly attractive when few input-output data
samples are available. In such cases however, the influence of the system
initial conditions may have a significant impact on the output dynamics.
In this paper, we specifically address this point. We propose three methods
that deal with the estimation of initial conditions using different types of
information. The methods consist in various mixed maximum likelihood–a
posteriori estimators which estimate the initial conditions and tune the
hyperparameters characterizing the stable spline kernel. To solve the
related optimization problems, we resort to the expectation-maximization
method, showing that the solutions can be attained by iterating among
simple update steps. Numerical experiments show the advantages, in terms
of accuracy in reconstructing the system impulse response, of the proposed
strategies, compared to other kernel-based schemes not accounting for the
effect initial conditions.
1
Introduction
Regularized regression has a long history [1]. It has become a standard tool in
applied statistics [2], mainly due to its capability of reducing the mean square
error (MSE) of the regressor estimate [3], when compared to standard least
squares [4]. Recently, a novel method based on regularization has been proposed
for system identification [5]. In this approach, the goal is to get an estimate of
the impulse response of the system, using the so called kernel-based methods [6].
∗ R. S. Risuleo, G. Bottegal and H. Hjalmarsson are with the ACCESS Linnaeus Center,
School of Electrical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden (e-mail addresses:
[email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected]). This work was supported by the
European Research Council under the advanced grant LEARN, contract 267381 and by the
Swedish Research Council under contract 621-2009-4017.
1
To this end, the class of stable spline kernels has been proposed recently in [7], [8].
The main feature of these kernels is that they encode prior information on the
exponential stability of the system and on the smoothness of the impulse response.
These features have made stable spline kernels suitable for other estimation
problems, such as the reconstruction of exponential decays [9] and correlation
functions [10]. Other kernels for system identification have been introduced in
subsequent studies, see for instance [11], [12].
Stable spline kernels are parameterized by two hyperparameters, that determine magnitude and shape of the kernel and that need to be estimated from
data. An effective approach for hyperparameter estimation relies upon empirical
Bayes arguments [13]. Specifically, exploiting the Bayesian interpretation of regularization [14], the impulse response is modeled as the realization of a Gaussian
process whose covariance matrix corresponds to the kernel. The hyperparameters
are then estimated by maximizing the marginal likelihood of the output data,
obtained by integrating out the dependence on the impulse response. Given a
choice of hyperparameters, the unknown impulse response is found by computing
its minimum MSE Bayesian estimate [5].
One situation where kernel-based methods are preferable is when data records
are short (e.g., five times the rise time of the system). This mainly because of
two reasons:
1. Kernel-based methods do not require the selection of a model order. Standard parametric techniques (such as the prediction error method [4], [15])
need to rely on model selection criteria, such as AIC or BIC, if the structure
of the system is unknown [16]. These could be unreliable when faced with
small data sets.
2. The bias introduced by regularization reduces the variance. With small
data records, the variance can be very high. If the bias is of the right kind,
it will compensate for the variance effect in the MSE [2, Ch. 2.9].
When data records are very short (e.g., two times the rise time of the system)
we cannot ignore the effect of the initial conditions. In fact, if the system is
not at rest before the experiment is performed, then there are transient effects
that cannot be explained using only the collected data. Standard workarounds,
such as discarding those output samples that depend on the initial conditions or
approximating the initial conditions to zero [4, Ch. 10.1], may give unsatisfactory
results. Thus, it seems preferable to deal with the initial conditions by estimating
them. In this paper we discuss how to incorporate the estimation of the initial
conditions in the context of kernel-based system identification. We discuss three
possible approaches to the problem. First, we propose a method that incorporates
the unknown initial conditions as parameters, to be estimated along with the
kernel hyperparameters. Then, assuming that the input is an autoregressive–
moving-average (ARMA) stationary process, we propose to estimate the initial
conditions using the available samples of the input, thus designing a minimum
variance estimate of the initial conditions from the input samples. Finally, we
design a mixed maximum a posteriori–marginal likelihood (MAP–ML) estimator
2
(see [17]) that effectively exploits information from both input and output data.
We solve the optimization problems using novel iterative schemes based on the
expectation-maximization (EM) method [18], similar to the technique used in
our previous works [19] and [20], where methods for Hammerstein and blind
system identification are proposed. We show that each iteration consists of a set
of simple update rules which either are available in closed-form or involve scalar
optimization problems, that can be solved using a computationally efficient grid
search.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we formulate the problem
of system identification with uncertainty on the initial conditions. In Section 3,
we provide a short review of kernel-based system identification. In Section 4,
we propose the initial-conditions estimation strategies and the related system
identification algorithms. In Section 5, we show the results of numerical experiments. In these experiments, the discussed method are compared with
standard techniques used to deal with unknown initial conditions. In Section 6,
we summarize the work and conclude the paper.
2
Problem formulation
We consider the output error model of the form
yt =
∞
X
gk ut−k + vt ,
(1)
k=0
+∞
where {gt }t=0 is the impulse response of a linear time-invariant system. For
notational convenience, we assume there are no delays in the system (g0 6= 0).
n−1
We approximate g by considering its first n samples {gt }t=0 , where n is chosen
large enough to capture the system dynamics. The system is driven by the input
ut and the measurements of the output yt are corrupted by the process vt , which
is zero-mean white Gaussian noise with variance σ 2 .
N −1
N −1
Given a set of N measurements, denoted by {ut }t=0 , {yt }t=0 , we are
n−1
interested in estimating the first n samples of the impulse response {gt }t=0 . To
this end, we formulate this system identification problem as the linear regression
problem
y = Ug + v ,
(2)
where we have introduced the following
y0
y := ... , g :=
yN −1
vector/matrix
g0
.. , v :=
.
gn−1
3
notation
v0
.. ,
.
vN −1
u0
u1
u2
..
.
U =
uN −1
u−1
u0
u1
..
.
u−2
u−1
u0
..
.
uN −2
uN −3
···
u−n+1
u−n+2
u−n+3
.
..
.
(3)
uN −n
The matrix U contains the samples u−1 , . . . , u−n+1 , that we call initial conditions,
that are unavailable. Common ways to overcome this problem are, for instance
• Discard the first n − 1 collected samples of y. However, if N is not much
larger than n, (e.g., if n ∼ 100 and N ∼ 200), there is a considerable loss
of information.
• Assume that the system is at rest before the experiment is performed,
(i.e. u−1 , . . ., u−n+1 = 0). This assumption might be too restrictive or
unrealistic.
In this paper, our aim is to study how to exploit the available information to
estimate the initial conditions, in order to improve the identification performance.
Specifically, we will present three estimators that make different use of the
available information.
3
Kernel-based system identification
In this section we briefly review the kernel-based approach introduced in [7], [8].
Exploiting the Bayesian interpretation of kernel-based methods [14], we model
the unknown impulse response as a Gaussian random process, namely
g ∼ N (0, λKβ ) .
(4)
We parameterize the covariance matrix Kβ (the kernel) with the hyperparameter
β. The structure of the kernel determines the properties of the realizations
of (4); its choice is therefore of paramount importance. An effective kernel for
system-identification purposes is the stable spline kernel [7], [21]. In particular,
in this paper we use the first-order stable spline kernel (or TC kernel in [11]),
that is defined as
{Kβ }i,j := β max(i,j) ,
(5)
where β is a scalar in the interval [0, 1). The role of this hyperparameter is to
regulate the velocity of the exponential decay of the impulse responses drawn
from the kernel. The hyperparameter λ ≥ 0 is a scaling factor that regulates the
amplitude of the realizations of (4).
We collect the hyperparameters into the vector
ρ := λ β
(6)
4
and introduce the following notation:
u−n+1
u
u := −
u− := ...
u+
u−1
u0
u+ := ... ,
uN −1
where u− contains the unknown initial conditions. Since we have assumed a
Gaussian distribution for the noise, the joint description of y and g is Gaussian,
parameterized by u− and ρ. Therefore, we can write
y
0
Σy Σyg
p
; ρ, u− ∼ N
,
,
(7)
g
0
Σgy λKβ
where Σyg = ΣTgy = λU Kβ and Σy = λU Kβ U T + σ 2 I. It follows that the
posterior distribution of g given y is Gaussian, namely
p(g|y; ρ, u− ) = N ĝ, Σg|y ,
(8)
where
−1
UT U
UT
−1
+
(λK
)
,
ĝ = Σg|y 2 y .
(9)
β
2
σ
σ
Equation (8) implies that the minimum variance estimator of g (in the Bayesian
sense, see [22]) is
ĝ = E[g|y; ρ, u− ] .
(10)
Σg|y =
The estimate ĝ depends on the hyperparameter vector ρ and the initial conditions.
These quantities need to be estimated from data. In the next section we focus
our attention to the estimation of the kernel hyperparameters and the initial
conditions, describing different strategies to obtain these quantities.
Remark 1. The estimator (10) depends also on the noise variance σ 2 . In this
work, we assume that this parameter is known. It can for instance be estimated
by fitting a least-squares estimate of the system g and then computing the sample
variance of the residuals.
4
Estimation of initial conditions and hyperparameters
In most works on kernel-based system identification (see e.g. [5] for a survey),
the authors adopt an empirical-Bayes approach to estimate the hyperparameters
that define the kernel. This amounts to maximizing the marginal likelihood
(ML) of the output, found integrating g out of (7).
In the standard case, that is when u− is assumed to be known, the ML
estimator of the hyperparameters corresponds to
ρ̂ = arg max p(y; ρ, u− ) .
ρ
(11)
We start from (11) to design new estimators for the initial conditions and the
kernel hyperparameters.
5
4.1
Model-less estimate
The most straightforward generalization of (11) is to include the initial conditions
among the ML parameters. The initial conditions become unknown quantities
that parameterize the impulse response estimator. The ML criterion then
becomes
ρ̂, û− = arg max p(y ; ρ, u− ) ,
(12)
ρ, u−
where the maximization is carried out over the unknown initial conditions as well.
This problem is nonconvex and possibly high dimensional, as the number of initial
conditions to be estimated is equal to the number of impulse response samples.
To overcome this difficulty, we devise a strategy based on the expectationmaximization method that yields a solution to (12) by iterating simple updates.
To this end, we suppose we have any estimate of the unknown quantities ρ̂(k)
(k)
and û− , and we calculate the current estimate of the impulse response, as well
as its variance, from (9). Define the matrix
(k)
Ŝ (k) = Σ̂g|y + ĝ (k) ĝ (k) T ,
(13)
which is the second moment of the current estimated impulse response. We
introduce the discrete-derivator matrix
∆ij = δi,j − δi,j+1 ,
(14)
and we calculate the second moment of the derivative of the estimated impulse
response at iteration k, ∆ĝ (k) , given by
D̂(k) := ∆Ŝ (k) ∆T .
(15)
The Toeplitz matrix of the input samples U can be split in two parts, namely
U = U+ + U− , where U+ is fully determined by the available samples, and U−
is composed of the unknown initial conditions. Define the matrix R ∈ RN n×N
that satisfies the relation Ru− = vec(U− ); and call Ĝ(k) the Toeplitz matrix of
the estimated impulse response at the kth iteration. Furthermore, define
h
i
Â(k) := RT Ŝ (k) ⊗ IN R,
(16)
h
i
T
b̂(k) T := vec(U+ ) Ŝ (k) ⊗ IN R − y T Ĝ(k).
With all the definitions in place, we can state the theorem that provides us with
the iterative update of the estimates that solves (12).
Theorem 1. Consider the hyperparameter estimator (12). Starting from any
initial guess of the initial conditions and the hyperparameters, compute
−1 (k)
û(k+1) = Â(k)
b̂ ,
(17)
β̂ (k+1) = arg min Q(β) ,
(18)
β∈[0,1)
n
λ̂(k+1) =
1 X ˆ(k)
d wβ̂ (k+1) ,i ,
n i=1 i
6
(19)
with Â(k) and b̂(k) defined in (16), and
Q(β) := n log f (β) +
f (β) :=
n−1
X
n(n − 1)
log β − log(1 − β) ,
2
(k)
1−n
dˆi β −i + dˆ(k)
;
n (1 − β)β
(20)
(21)
i=1
(k)
where dˆi is the ith diagonal element of (15), and wβ̂ (k+1) ,i is the ith element of
wβ :=
1 h
1
β − β2
1
β
···
1
β n−2
1−β
β n−1
i
,
(22)
∞
when β = β̂ (k+1) . Let ρ̂(k+1) = [λ̂(k+1) , β̂ (k+1) ]; then the sequences {û(k) }k=0
∞
and {ρ̂(k) }k=0 converge to a maximum of (12).
Proof. See Appendix.
Remark 2. The EM method does not guarantee convergence of the sequences
to a global maximum (see [23] and [24]). However, experiments (see Section 5)
have show that, for this particular problem, the EM method converges to the
global maximum independently of how it is initialized.
Thus, we can use Theorem 1 to find a maximum of the marginal likelihood of
the hyperparameters and the initial conditions, and then use these parameters
to solve the impulse response estimation problem with (10), where we use the
limits of the sequences of estimates.
4.2
Conditional mean estimate
The model-less estimator presented in Section 4.1 estimates the initial conditions
using only information present in the system output y. It does not rely on any
model of the input signal u. To show how an available model can be used to
estimate the missing initial conditions, we introduce the following assumption.
Assumption 1. The input ut is a realization of a stationary Gaussian process
with zero-mean and known rational spectrum. Equivalently, ut is a realization
on an ARMA process with known coefficients.
Assumption 1 implies that ut can be expressed as the output of a difference
equation driven by white Gaussian noise with unit variance [25], namely
ut + d1 ut−1 + · · · + dp ut−p = c0 et + · · · + cp et−p ,
(23)
where et ∼ N (0, 1). Since, using Assumption 1, we can construct the probability
density of the input process, a possible approach to solve (11) is to estimate the
missing initial conditions from the input process. To this end, consider (23). If
7
we define the matrices D as the toeplitz matrix of the coefficients 0, d1 , d2 , . . . ,
and C as the toeplitz matrix of the coefficients c1 , c2 , . . . , then we can write
u = −Du + Ce ,
e := e−n+1
···
eN
T
,
(24)
so that p(u) ∼ N (0, Σu ), with
−1
Σu = (I + D)
−T
CC T (I + D)
.
(25)
We thus have a joint probabilistic description of the initial conditions u− and
the available input samples u+ . We can partition Σu into four blocks according
to the sizes of u− and u+
Σ− Σ−+
Σu =
.
Σ+− Σ+
It follows (see [22]) that the posterior distribution of the unavailable data is
p(u− |u+ ) = N (u−|+ , Σ−|+ ), where
u−|+ = Σ−+ Σ−1
+ u+ ,
Σ−|+ = Σ− − Σ−+ Σ−1
+ Σ+− .
(26)
So we can find the minimum variance estimate of u− as the conditional mean
u−|+ , namely û− = u−|+ .
Having an estimate of the initial conditions, we need to find the hyperparameters that define the kernel. In this case, empirical Bayes amounts to solving the
ML problem
ρ̂ = arg max p(y ; ρ, û− ) ,
(27)
ρ
where the unknown initial conditions have been replaced by their conditional
mean. The following theorem states how to solve the maximization using the
EM method.
Theorem 2. Consider the hyperparameter estimator (27). Starting from an
initial guess of the hyperparameters, compute
β̂ (k+1) = arg min Q(β) ,
(28)
β∈[0,1)
n
λ̂(k+1) =
1 X ˆ(k)
d wβ̂ (k+1) ,i ,
n i=1 i
(29)
(k)
with Q(β), dˆi , and wβ̂ (k+1) ,i defined in Theorem 1. Let ρ̂(k+1) = [λ̂(k+1) , β̂ (k+1) ],
∞
then the sequence {ρ̂(k) }k=0 converges to a maximum of (27).
Proof. See Appendix.
Remark 3. The updates (28) and (29) require the evaluation of (15) at each
iteration. In this case the estimate ĝ (k) of the impulse response is given by (10),
where u− is replaced by its conditional mean.
8
4.3
Joint input-output estimate
The conditional mean estimator presented in Section 4.2 exploits the structure
of the input to estimate the missing samples. The model-less estimator, instead,
uses information contained in the output samples. In this section we show how
to merge these two information sources, defining a joint input-output estimator
of the initial conditions.
We use Assumption 1 to account for the statistical properties of u− . We
propose the following mixed MAP–ML estimator
ρ̂, û− = arg max p(y | u− , u+ ; ρ)p(u− | u+ ) ,
(30)
ρ, u−
where we have highlighted the dependence on the known input sequence u+ . A
key role is played by the term p(u− | u+ ): it acts as a prior distribution for the
unknown values of u− and puts weight on the values that better agree with the
observed data u+ .
Even in this case, the solution can be found with an iterative procedure based
on the EM method.
Theorem 3. Consider the hyperparameter estimator (30). Starting from an
initial guess of the initial conditions and the hyperparameters, compute
(k+1)
û
=
!−1
!
−1
Â(k)
b̂(k)
−1
−1
+Σ−|+
+Σ−|+u−|+ ,
σ2
σ2
(31)
β̂ (k+1) = arg min Q(β) ,
(32)
β∈[0,1)
n
λ̂(k+1) =
1 X ˆ(k)
d wβ̂ (k+1) ,i ,
n i=1 i
(33)
(k)
with Â(k) and b̂(k) from (16); and with Q(β), dˆi , and wβ̂ (k+1) ,i defined in
∞
Theorem 1. Let ρ̂(k+1) = [λ̂(k+1) , β̂ (k+1) ]; then, the sequences {û(k) }k=0 and
∞
{ρ̂(k) }k=0 converge to a maximum of (30).
Proof. See Appendix.
Remark 4. This estimator incorporates the prior information about the initial
conditions using the mean u−|+ and the covariance matrix Σ−|+ . If we suppose
that we can manipulate Σ−|+ , we can see this estimator as a more general
estimator, that contains the model-less and conditional mean as limit cases. In
fact, setting Σ−|+ = ∞, we get the model-less estimator. Conversely, setting
Σ−|+ = 0, we obtain the conditional-mean estimator, as (31) would yield a
degenerate iteration where all the updates are û(k+1) = u−|+ . We point however
out that the model-less estimator does not rely on any assumption on the input
model, whereas the joint input-output estimator requires that the input is a
Gaussian process with known pdf.
9
5
Numerical experiments
5.1
Experiment setup
To compare the proposed methods, we perform five numerical experiments, each
one consisting of 200 Monte Carlo simulations, with sample sizes 150, 200, 250,
300, and 400. At each Monte Carlo run, we generate a dynamic system of order
40. The system is such that the zeros are constrained within the circle of radius
0.99 on the complex plane, while the magnitude of the poles is no larger than
0.95. The impulse response length is 100 samples. The input is obtained by
filtering white noise with unit variance through a 8-th order ARMA filter of
the form (23). The coefficients of the filter are randomly chosen at each Monte
Carlo run, and they are such that the poles of the filter are constrained within
the circular region of radii 0.8 and 0.95 in the complex plane.
Random trajectories of input and noise are generated at each run. In
particular, the noise variance is such that the ratio between the variance of the
noiseless output of the system and the noise variance is equal to 20.
The following estimators are compared during the experiments.
• KB-IC-Zeros: This method does not attempt any estimation of the initial
conditions. It sets their value to 0 (that, when assumption 1 holds, corresponds to the a-priori mean of the vector u− ). The kernel hyperparameters
are obtained solving (11), with u− = 0.
• KB-Trunc: This method also avoids the estimation of the initial conditions
by discarding the first n − 1 output samples, which depend on the unknown
vector u− . The hyperparameters are obtained solving (11), using the
truncated data.
• KB-IC-ModLess: This is the model-less kernel-based estimator presented
in Section 4.1.
• KB-IC-Mean: This is the conditional mean kernel-based estimator presented in Section 4.2.
• KB-IC-Joint: This is the joint input-output kernel-based estimator presented in Section 4.3.
• KB-IC-Oracle: This estimator has access to the vector u− , and estimates
the kernel hyperparameters using (11).
The performances of the estimators are evaluated by means of the fitting
score, computed as
kgi − ĝi k2
F ITi = 100 1 −
,
(34)
kgi − ḡi k2
where gi is the impulse response generated at the i-th run, ḡi its mean and ĝi
the estimate computed by the tested methods.
10
N
150
200
250
300
400
KB-IC-Zeros
KB-Trunc
KB-IC-ModLess
KB-IC-Mean
KB-IC-Joint
KB-IC-Oracle
51.698
42.010
54.017
54.146
55.695
57.317
54.856
51.038
55.793
56.003
57.133
57.902
61.151
59.400
61.687
62.061
62.776
63.781
61.380
61.085
63.074
63.715
64.310
64.893
63.186
62.963
63.466
64.187
64.457
64.959
Table 1: Table of experimental results. Shown is the average fit in percent over
the different experiments.
5.2
Results
Table 1 shows the average fit (in percent) of the impulse response over the Monte
Carlo experiments. We can see that, for short data sequences the amount of
information discarded by the estimator KB-Trunc makes its performance degrade
with respect to the other estimators. The estimator KB-IC-Zeros performs better,
however suffers from the effects of the wrong assumption that the system was
at rest before the experiment was performed. From these results, we see that
the estimation of the initial conditions has a positive effect on the accuracy of
the estimated impulse response. For larger data records the performances of the
estimator KB-IC-Mean and of the estimator KB-IC-ModLess improve, as more
samples become available.
When the available data becomes larger, all the methods perform well, with
fits that are in the neighborhood of the fit of the oracle.
The positive performance of KB-IC-Mean indicates that the predictability of
the input can be exploited to improve estimates, and that model-based approaches
to initial condition estimation outperforms model-less estimation methods (if the
input model is known). The further improvement of KB-IC-Joint indicates that
the output measurements can be used to obtain additional information about
the unobserved initial conditions, information that is not contained in the input
process itself.
6
Discussion
We have proposed three new methods for estimating the initial conditions of a
system when using kernel-based methods. Assuming that the input is a stationary
ARMA process with known spectrum, we have designed mixed MAP–ML criteria
which aim at jointly estimating the hyperparameters of the kernel and the initial
conditions of the systems. To solve the related optimization problems, we have
proposed a novel EM-based iterative scheme. The scheme consists in a sequence
of simple update rules, given by unconstrained quadratic problems or scalar
optimization problems. Numerical experiments have shown that the proposed
methods outperform other standard methods, such as truncation or zero initial
11
conditions.
The methods presented here estimate n − 1 initial conditions (where n is the
length of the FIR approximating the true system), since no information on the
order of the system is given. Assuming that the system order is known and equal
to say, p, the number of initial conditions to be estimated would boil down to p.
However, there would also be p unknown transient responses which need to be
identified. These transients would be characterized by impulse responses with
the same poles as the overall system impulse response, but with different zeros.
How to design a kernel correlating these transient responses with the system
impulse response is still an open problem.
Appendix: Proofs
6.1
Theorem 1
Consider the ML criterion (12). To apply the EM method, we consider the
complete log-likelihood
1
N
ky − U gk2 − 2 log σ 2
2σ 2
σ
−1
1
1
− g T λKβ
g − log det λKβ .
2
2
L(y, g) = −
where we have introduced g as a latent variable. Suppose that we have computed
(k)
the estimates ρ̂(k) of the hyperparameters and û− of the initial conditions. We
define the function
(k)
Q(ρ, u− ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) := E [L(y, g)] ,
(35)
(k)
where the expectation is taken with respect to the conditional density p(g|y; ρ̂(k) , û− ),
defined in (8). We obtain (neglecting terms independent from the optimization
variables)
(k)
(k)
(k)
Q(ρ, u− ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) = Q1 (u− ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) + Q2 (ρ; ρ̂(k) , û− ),
(36)
where
(k)
Q1 (u− ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) =
n
o
1
T
T
− 2 y T U− ĝ + tr U−
U− − 2U−
U+ Ŝ (k) ,
2σ
o 1
1 n
(k)
Q2 (ρ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) = − tr (λKβ )−1 Ŝ (k) − log det λKβ ),
2
2
(37)
(38)
and Ŝ (k) = Σ̂g|y + ĝ ĝ T . Define new parameters from
(k+1)
ρ̂(k+1) , û−
(k)
= arg max Q(ρ, u− ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) .
ρ,u−
12
(39)
By iterating between (35) and (39) we obtain a sequence of estimates that
converges to a maximum of (12) (see e.g., [23] for details). Using (36), (39) splits
in the two maximization problems
(k+1)
û−
(k)
= arg max Q1 (u− ; ρ̂(k) , u− ) ,
u−
(k)
ρ̂(k+1) = arg max Q2 (ρ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) .
ρ
(40)
(41)
Consider the maximization of (37) with respect to u− . Using the matrix R
we have
n
h
i
T
tr U−
U− Ŝ (k) } = uT− RT Ŝ (k) ⊗ IN Ru− ,
(42)
n
o
h
i
T
T
tr U−
U+ Ŝ (k) = vec(U+ ) Ŝ (k) ⊗ IN Ru− ,
(43)
where ⊗ denotes the Kronecker product. We now collect u− , and obtain
(k)
Q1 (u− ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) = −
1
1 T (k)
u− Â u− + 2 uT− b̂(k)
2
2σ
σ
(44)
with Â(k) and b̂(k) defined in (16). Hence, (40) is an unconstrained quadratic
optimization, whose solution is given by (17).
Consider now the maximization of (38) with respect to ρ. We can calculate
the derivative of Q2 with respect to λ, obtaining
o
n
1 n
∂Q2
= − 2 tr Kβ−1 Ŝ (k) +
;
∂λ
2λ
2λ
(45)
which is equal to zero for
λ∗ =
1 n −1 (k) o
tr Kβ Ŝ
.
n
(46)
We thus have an expression of the optimal value of λ as a function of β. If we
insert this value in Q2 , we obtain
(k)
Q2 ([λ∗ β]; ρ̂(k) , û− ) =
n
o 1
1
− log tr Kβ−1 Ŝ (k)
− log det Kβ + k1 ,
2
2
(47)
where k1 is constant. We now rewrite the first order stable spline kernel using
the factorization (see [26])
Kβ = ∆−1 Wβ ∆−T ,
(48)
where ∆ is defined in (14) and
β n−1
Wβ := (β − β 2 )diag 1, β, . . . , β n−2 ,
.
1−β
13
(49)
From (15), we find
(k)
Q2 ([λ∗ β]; ρ̂(k) , û− ) =
!
n
n
X
X
(k)
−1
n log
dˆ w
+
log wβ,ii + k2 ,
i
β,ii
i=1
(50)
i=1
(k)
where dˆi and wβ,ii are the i-th diagonal elements of dˆ(k) and of Wβ respectively,
and k2 is a constant. If we define the function (21), we can rewrite (50) as (20).
so that we obtain (20) and (21). Using a similar reasoning, we can rewrite (46)
as (19).
Theorem 2
Consider the ML criterion (27). The proof follows the same arguments as the
proof of Theorem 1, with the optimization carried out on ρ only and with
u− = u−|+ .
Theorem 3
Consider the ML criterion (30). Consider the complete data log-likelihood
L2 (y, g) := log p(y, g, u− ; ρ, ) ,
(51)
(k)
(k)
Given any estimates ρ̂(k) and û− , take the expectation with respect to p(g|y; ρ̂(k) , û− ).
We obtain
(k)
(k)
E L2 (y, g) = Q1 (u− ; ρ̂(k) , û− ) + Q2 (ρ; ρ̂(k) , û− )
T
1
− u−− u−|+ Σ−1
(52)
−|+ u−− u−|+ ,
2
with Q1 and Q2 defined in (37) and (38). Collecting the terms in u− and using (44) we obtain an unconstrained optimization problem in u− , that gives (31).
The optimization in ρ follows the same procedure as in Theorem 1 and gives (32)
and (33).
References
[1] A. N. Tikhonov and V. Y. Arsenin. Solutions of ill-posed problems. Vh
Winston, 1977. i s b n: 0470991240.
[2] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, and J. Franklin. The elements of
statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Springer-Verlag
New York Inc., 2009. i s b n: 0387848576.
[3]
W. James and C. Stein. “Estimation with quadratic loss”. Proceedings of
the fourth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.
Vol. 1. 1961. 1961, pp. 361–379.
14
[4]
L. Ljung. System Identification, Theory for the User. Prentice Hall, 1999.
[5] G. Pillonetto, F. Dinuzzo, T. Chen, G. D. Nicolao, and L. Ljung. “Kernel
methods in system identification, machine learning and function estimation: A survey”. Automatica 50.3 (2014), pp. 657–682. d o i: 10.1016/j.
automatica.2014.01.001.
[6] B. Schölkopf and A. J. Smola. Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. MIT press, 2002.
[7] G. Pillonetto and G. De Nicolao. “A new kernel-based approach for linear
system identification”. Automatica 46.1 (2010), pp. 81–93. d o i: doi :
10.1016/j.automatica.2009.10.031.
[8] G. Pillonetto, A. Chiuso, and G. De Nicolao. “Prediction error identification
of linear systems: a nonparametric Gaussian regression approach”. Automatica 47.2 (2011), pp. 291–305. d o i: 10.1016/j.automatica.2010.11.004.
[9] G. Pillonetto, A. Chiuso, and G. De Nicolao. “Regularized estimation of
sums of exponentials in spaces generated by stable spline kernels”. Proc.
Amer. Control Conf. (ACC). 2010, pp. 498–503. d o i: 10.1109/ACC.2010.
5530862.
[10] G. Bottegal and G. Pillonetto. “Regularized spectrum estimation using
stable spline kernels”. Automatica 49.11 (2013), pp. 3199–3209. d o i:
10.1016/j.automatica.2013.08.010.
[11] T. Chen, H. Ohlsson, and L. Ljung. “On the estimation of transfer functions, regularizations and Gaussian processes—Revisited”. Automatica 48.8
(2012), pp. 1525–1535. d o i: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.05.026.
[12] T. Chen and L. Ljung. “Constructive State Space Model Induced Kernels
for Regularized System Identification”. Proc. IFAC World Congr. Vol. 19.
1. 2014, pp. 1047–1052. d o i: 10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01254.
[13] J. Maritz and T. Lwin. Empirical bayes methods. Chapman and Hall
London, 1989. i s b n: 9780412277603.
[14] G. Wahba. Spline models for observational data. Vol. 59. SIAM, 1990.
i s b n: 0898712440.
[15] T. Söderström and P. Stoica. System identification. Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
1988. i s b n: 9780138812362.
[16] S. Beghelli, R. Guidorzi, and U. Soverini. “The Frisch scheme in dynamic
system identification”. Automatica 26.1 (1990), pp. 171–176. d o i: 10.
1016/0005-1098(90)90168-h.
[17] A. Yeredor. “The joint MAP-ML criterion and its relation to ML and
to extended least-squares”. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 48.12 (2000),
pp. 3484–3492. d o i: 10.1109/78.887041.
[18] A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. “Maximum likelihood
from incomplete data via the EM algorithm”. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat.
Methodol. (1977), pp. 1–38.
15
[19] R. S. Risuleo, G. Bottegal, and H. Hjalmarsson. “A kernel-based approach to Hammerstein system identication”. Proc. IFAC Symp. System Identification (SYSID). Vol. 48. 28. 2015, pp. 1011–1016. d o i: doi:
10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.12.263.
[20] G. Bottegal, R. S. Risuleo, and H. Hjalmarsson. “Blind system identification
using kernel-based methods”. Proc. IFAC Symp. System Identification
(SYSID). Vol. 48. 28. 2015, pp. 466–471. d o i: doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.
2015.12.172.
[21] G. Pillonetto and G. De Nicolao. “Kernel selection in linear system identification Part I: A Gaussian process perspective”. Proc. IEEE Conf. Decis.
Control - European Control Conf. (CDC-ECC). 2011, pp. 4318–4325. d o i:
10.1109/CDC.2011.6160606.
[22] B. D. O. Anderson and J. B. Moore. Optimal filtering. Courier Corporation,
2012.
[23] G. McLachlan and T. Krishnan. The EM algorithm and extensions. Vol. 382.
John Wiley and Sons, 2007. i s b n: 9780471201700.
[24] P. Tseng. “An Analysis of the EM Algorithm and Entropy-Like Proximal
Point Methods”. Mathematics of Operations Research 29.1 (2004), pp. 27–
44. d o i: 10.1287/moor.1030.0073.
[25] A. S. Papoulis and U. Pillai. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic
Processes. McGraw-Hill Education Ltd, 2002. i s b n: 0071226613.
[26] F. Carli. “On the maximum entropy property of the first-order stable spline
kernel and its implications”. Proc. IEEE Conf. Control Applicat. (CCA).
IEEE. 2014, pp. 409–414. d o i: 10.1109/CCA.2014.6981380.
16
| 3cs.SY
|
Logical Methods in Computer Science
Vol. 1 (2:5) 2005, pp. 1–39
www.lmcs-online.org
Submitted
Published
Apr. 1, 2005
Nov. 8, 2005
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED
CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY
MALGORZATA BIERNACKA, DARIUSZ BIERNACKI, AND OLIVIER DANVY
BRICS, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus
IT-parken, Aabogade 34, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
e-mail address: {mbiernac,dabi,danvy}@brics.dk
Abstract. We present an abstract machine and a reduction semantics for the lambdacalculus extended with control operators that give access to delimited continuations in
the CPS hierarchy. The abstract machine is derived from an evaluator in continuationpassing style (CPS); the reduction semantics (i.e., a small-step operational semantics with
an explicit representation of evaluation contexts) is constructed from the abstract machine;
and the control operators are the shift and reset family.
We also present new applications of delimited continuations in the CPS hierarchy:
finding list prefixes and normalization by evaluation for a hierarchical language of units
and products.
1. Introduction
The studies of delimited continuations can be classified in two groups: those that use
continuation-passing style (CPS) and those that rely on operational intuitions about control instead. Of the latter, there is a large number proposing a variety of control operators [5, 37, 40, 41, 49, 52, 53, 65, 70, 74, 80] which have found applications in models of control,
concurrency, and type-directed partial evaluation [8,52,75]. Of the former, there is the work
revolving around the family of control operators shift and reset [27–29,32,42,43,55,56,66,80]
which have found applications in non-deterministic programming, code generation, partial evaluation, normalization by evaluation, computational monads, and mobile computing [6, 7, 9, 17, 22, 23, 33, 34, 44, 46, 48, 51, 57, 59, 61, 72, 77–79].
The original motivation for shift and reset was a continuation-based programming pattern involving several layers of continuations. The original specification of these operators
relied both on a repeated CPS transformation and on an evaluator with several layers
of continuations (as is obtained by repeatedly transforming a direct-style evaluator into
continuation-passing style). Only subsequently have shift and reset been specified operationally, by developing operational analogues of a continuation semantics and of the CPS
transformation [32].
2000 ACM Subject Classification: D.1.1; F.3.2.
Key words and phrases: Delimited continuations, abstract machines, reduction semantics.
l
LOGICAL METHODS
IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
c
DOI:10.2168/LMCS-1 (2:5) 2005
CC
M. Biernacka, D. Biernacki, and O. Danvy
Creative Commons
2
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
The goal of our work here is to establish a new operational foundation for delimited
continuations, using CPS as a guideline. To this end, we start with the original evaluator
for shift1 and reset1 . This evaluator uses two layers of continuations: a continuation and a
meta-continuation. We then defunctionalize it into an abstract machine [1] and we construct
the corresponding reduction semantics [36], as pioneered by Felleisen and Friedman [39].
The development scales to shiftn and resetn . It is reusable for any control operators that
are compatible with CPS, i.e., that can be characterized with a (possibly iterated) CPS
translation or with a continuation-based evaluator. It also pinpoints where operational
intuitions go beyond CPS.
This article is structured as follows. In Section 2, we review the enabling technology of our work: Reynolds’s defunctionalization, the observation that a defunctionalized
CPS program implements an abstract machine, and the observation that Felleisen’s evaluation contexts are the defunctionalized continuations of a continuation-passing evaluator;
we demonstrate this enabling technology on a simple example, arithmetic expressions. In
Section 3, we illustrate the use of shift and reset with the classic example of finding list
prefixes, using an ML-like programming language. In Section 4, we then present our main
result: starting from the original evaluator for shift and reset, we defunctionalize it into
an abstract machine; we analyze this abstract machine and construct the corresponding
reduction semantics. In Section 5, we extend this result to the CPS hierarchy. In Section 6,
we illustrate the CPS hierarchy with a class of normalization functions for a hierarchical
language of units and products.
2. From evaluator to reduction semantics for arithmetic expressions
We demonstrate the derivation from an evaluator to a reduction semantics. The derivation consists of the following steps:
(1) we start from an evaluator for a given language; if it is in direct style, we CPStransform it;
(2) we defunctionalize the CPS evaluator, obtaining a value-based abstract machine;
(3) we modify the abstract machine to make it term-based instead of value-based; in
particular, if the evaluator uses an environment, then so does the corresponding
value-based abstract machine, and in that case, making the machine term-based
leads us to use substitutions rather than an environment;
(4) we analyze the transitions of the term-based abstract machine to identify the evaluation strategy it implements and the set of reductions it performs; the result is a
reduction semantics.
The first two steps are based on previous work on a functional correspondence between
evaluators and abstract machines [1–3, 17, 26], which itself is based on Reynolds’s seminal
work on definitional interpreters [71]. The last two steps follow the lines of Felleisen and
Friedman’s original work on a reduction semantics for the call-by-value λ-calculus extended
with control operators [39]. The last step has been studied further by Hardin, Maranget,
and Pagano [50] in the context of explicit substitutions and by Biernacka, Danvy, and
Nielsen [15, 16, 31].
In the rest of this section, our running example is the language of arithmetic expressions,
formed using natural numbers (the values) and additions (the computations):
exp ∋ e ::= pmq | e1 + e2
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY
3
• Values: val ∋ v ::= m
• Evaluation function: eval : exp → val
eval (pmq) = m
eval (e1 + e2 ) = eval (e1 ) + eval (e2 )
• Main function:
evaluate : exp → val
evaluate (e) = eval (e)
Figure 1: A direct-style evaluator for arithmetic expressions
• Values: val ∋ v ::= m
• Continuations: cont = val → val
• Evaluation function: eval : exp × cont → val
eval (pmq, k) = k m
eval (e1 + e2 , k) = eval (e1 , λm1 . eval (e2 , λm2 . k (m1 + m2 )))
• Main function:
evaluate : exp → val
evaluate (e) = eval (e, λv. v)
Figure 2: A continuation-passing evaluator for arithmetic expressions
2.1. The starting point: an evaluator in direct style. We define an evaluation function for arithmetic expressions by structural induction on their syntax. The resulting directstyle evaluator is displayed in Figure 1.
2.2. CPS transformation. We CPS-transform the evaluator by naming intermediate results, sequentializing their computation, and introducing an extra functional parameter,
the continuation [29, 68, 76]. The resulting continuation-passing evaluator is displayed in
Figure 2.
2.3. Defunctionalization. The generalization of closure conversion [60] to defunctionalization is due to Reynolds [71]. The goal is to represent a functional value with a first-order
data structure. The means is to partition the function space into a first-order sum where
each summand corresponds to a lambda-abstraction in the program. In a defunctionalized
program, function introduction is thus represented as an injection, and function elimination
as a call to a first-order apply function implementing a case dispatch. In an ML-like functional language, sums are represented as data types, injections as data-type constructors,
and apply functions are defined by case over the corresponding data types [30].
Here, we defunctionalize the continuation of the continuation-passing evaluator in Figure 2. We thus need to define a first-order algebraic data type and its apply function. To
this end, we enumerate the lambda-abstractions that give rise to the inhabitants of this
function space; there are three: the initial continuation in evaluate and the two continuations in eval. The initial continuation is closed, and therefore the corresponding algebraic
constructor is nullary. The two other continuations have two free variables, and therefore
4
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
• Values: val ∋ v ::= m
• Defunctionalized continuations: cont ∋ k ::= [ ] | ADD2 (e, k) | ADD1 (v, k)
• Functions eval : exp × cont → val and apply cont : cont × val → val:
eval (pmq, k) = apply cont (k, m)
eval (e1 + e2 , k) = eval (e1 , ADD2 (e2 , k))
apply cont ([ ], v) = v
apply cont (ADD2 (e2 , k), v1 ) = eval (e2 , ADD1 (v1 , k))
apply cont (ADD1 (m1 , k), m2 ) = apply cont (k, m1 + m2 )
• Main function: evaluate : exp → val
evaluate (e) = eval (e, [ ])
Figure 3: A defunctionalized continuation-passing evaluator for arithmetic expressions
the corresponding constructors are binary. As for the apply function, it interprets the
algebraic constructors. The resulting defunctionalized evaluator is displayed in Figure 3.
2.4. Abstract machines as defunctionalized continuation-passing programs. Elsewhere [1, 26], we have observed that a defunctionalized continuation-passing program implements an abstract machine: each configuration is the name of a function together with
its arguments, and each function clause represents a transition. (As a corollary, we have
also observed that the defunctionalized continuation of an evaluator forms what is known
as an ‘evaluation context’ [25, 30, 39].)
Indeed Plotkin’s Indifference Theorem [68] states that continuation-passing programs
are independent of their evaluation order. In Reynolds’s words [71], all the subterms in
applications are ‘trivial’; and in Moggi’s words [64], these subterms are values and not
computations. Furthermore, continuation-passing programs are tail recursive [76]. Therefore, since in a continuation-passing program all calls are tail calls and all subcomputations
are elementary, a defunctionalized continuation-passing program implements a transition
system [69], i.e., an abstract machine.
We thus reformat Figure 3 into Figure 4. The correctness of the abstract machine with
respect to the initial evaluator follows from the correctness of CPS transformation and of
defunctionalization.
2.5. From value-based abstract machine to term-based abstract machine. We
observe that the domain of expressible values in Figure 4 can be embedded in the syntactic
domain of expressions. We therefore adapt the abstract machine to work on terms rather
than on values. The result is displayed in Figure 5; it is a syntactic theory [36].
2.6. From term-based abstract machine to reduction semantics. The method of
deriving a reduction semantics from an abstract machine was introduced by Felleisen and
Friedman [39] to give a reduction semantics for control operators. Let us demonstrate it.
We analyze the transitions of the abstract machine in Figure 5. The second component
of eval -transitions—the stack representing “the rest of the computation”—has already been
identified as the evaluation context of the currently processed expression. We thus read a
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY
5
• Values: v ::= m
• Evaluation contexts: C ::= [ ] | ADD2 (e, C) | ADD1 (v, C)
• Initial transition, transition rules, and final transition:
e ⇒ he, [ ]ieval
hpmq, Cieval ⇒ hC, micont
he1 + e2 , Cieval
hADD2 (e2 , C), v1 icont
⇒ he1 , ADD2 (e2 , C)ieval
⇒ he2 , ADD1 (v1 , C)ieval
hADD1 (m1 , C), m2 icont
h[ ], vicont
⇒ hC, m1 + m2 icont
⇒ v
Figure 4: A value-based abstract machine for evaluating arithmetic expressions
• Expressions and values: e ::= v | e1 + e2
v ::= pmq
• Evaluation contexts: C ::= [ ] | ADD2 (e, C) | ADD1 (v, C)
• Initial transition, transition rules, and final transition:
e ⇒ he, [ ]ieval
hpmq, Cieval
he1 + e2 , Cieval
⇒ hC, pmqicont
⇒ he1 , ADD2 (e2 , C)ieval
hADD2 (e2 , C), v1 icont
hADD1 (pm1q, C), pm2qicont
⇒ he2 , ADD1 (v1 , C)ieval
⇒ hC, pm1 + m2qicont
h[ ], vicont
⇒ v
Figure 5: A term-based abstract machine for processing arithmetic expressions
configuration he, Cieval as a decomposition of some expression into a sub-expression e and
an evaluation context C.
Next, we identify the reduction and decomposition rules in the transitions of the machine. Since a configuration can be read as a decomposition, we compare the left-hand side
and the right-hand side of each transition. If they represent the same expression, then the
given transition defines a decomposition (i.e., it searches for the next redex according to
some evaluation strategy); otherwise we have found a redex. Moreover, reading the decomposition rules from right to left defines a ‘plug’ function that reconstructs an expression
from its decomposition.
Here the decomposition function as read off the abstract machine is total. In general,
however, it may be undefined for stuck terms; one can then extend it straightforwardly into
a total function that decomposes a term into a context and a potential redex, i.e., an actual
redex (as read off the machine), or a stuck redex.
6
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
In this simple example there is only one reduction rule. This rule performs the addition
of natural numbers:
(add) C [pm1q + pm2q] → C [pm1 + m2q]
The remaining transitions decompose an expression according to the left-to-right strategy.
2.7. From reduction semantics to term-based abstract machine. In Section 2.6,
we have constructed the reduction semantics corresponding to the abstract machine of
Figure 5, as pioneered by Felleisen and Friedman [38, 39]. Over the last few years [15,
16, 24, 31], Biernacka, Danvy, and Nielsen have studied the converse transformation and
systematized the construction of an abstract machine from a reduction semantics. The
main idea is to short-cut the decompose-contract-plug loop, in the definition of evaluation
as the transitive closure of one-step reduction, into a refocus-contract loop. The refocus
function is constructed as an efficient (i.e., deforested) composition of plug and decompose
that maps a term and a context either to a value or to a redex and a context. The result
is a ‘pre-abstract machine’ computing the transitive closure of the refocus function. This
pre-abstract machine can then be simplified into an eval/apply abstract machine.
It is simple to verify that using refocusing, one can go from the reduction semantics of
Section 2.6 to the eval/apply abstract machine of Figure 5.
2.8. Summary and conclusion. We have demonstrated how to derive an abstract machine out of an evaluator, and how to construct the corresponding reduction semantics out
of this abstract machine. In Section 4, we apply this derivation and this construction to the
first level of the CPS hierarchy, and in Section 5, we apply them to an arbitrary level of the
CPS hierarchy. But first, let us illustrate how to program with delimited continuations.
3. Programming with delimited continuations
We present two examples of programming with delimited continuations. Given a list
xs and a predicate p, we want
(1) to find the first prefix of xs whose last element satisfies p, and
(2) to find all such prefixes of xs.
For example, given the predicate λm.m > 2 and the list [0, 3, 1, 4, 2, 5], the first prefix is
[0, 3] and the list of all the prefixes is [[0, 3], [0, 3, 1, 4], [0, 3, 1, 4, 2, 5]].
In Section 3.1, we start with a simple solution that uses a first-order accumulator.
This simple solution is in defunctionalized form. In Section 3.2, we present its higher-order
counterpart, which uses a functional accumulator. This functional accumulator acts as a
delimited continuation. In Section 3.3, we present its direct-style counterpart (which uses
shift and reset) and in Section 3.4, we present its continuation-passing counterpart (which
uses two layers of continuations). In Section 3.5, we introduce the CPS hierarchy informally.
We then mention a typing issue in Section 3.6 and review related work in Section 3.7.
3.1. Finding prefixes by accumulating lists. A simple solution is to accumulate the
prefix of the given list in reverse order while traversing this list and testing each of its
elements:
• if no element satisfies the predicate, there is no prefix and the result is the empty
list;
• otherwise, the prefix is the reverse of the accumulator.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY
find first prefix a (p, xs)
def
=
letrec visit (nil , a)
= nil
| visit (x :: xs, a)
= let a ′ = x :: a
in if p x
then reverse (a ′ , nil )
else visit (xs, a ′ )
and reverse (nil , xs)
= xs
| reverse (x :: a, xs)
= reverse (a, x :: xs)
in visit (xs, nil)
find all prefixes a (p, xs)
def
letrec visit (nil , a)
= nil
| visit (x :: xs, a)
= let a ′ = x :: a
in if p x
then (reverse (a ′ , nil)) :: (visit (xs, a ′ ))
else visit (xs, a ′ )
and reverse (nil , xs)
= xs
| reverse (x :: a, xs)
= reverse (a, x :: xs)
in visit (xs, nil)
=
7
To find the first prefix, one stops as soon as a satisfactory list element is found. To list
all the prefixes, one continues the traversal, adding the current prefix to the list of the
remaining prefixes.
We observe that the two solutions are in defunctionalized form [30,71]: the accumulator
has the data type of a defunctionalized function and reverse is its apply function. We present
its higher-order counterpart next [54].
3.2. Finding prefixes by accumulating list constructors. Instead of accumulating the
prefix in reverse order while traversing the given list, we accumulate a function constructing
the prefix:
• if no element satisfies the predicate, the result is the empty list;
• otherwise, we apply the functional accumulator to construct the prefix.
8
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
find first prefix c 1 (p, xs)
def
=
letrec visit (nil , k )
= nil
| visit (x :: xs, k )
= let k ′ = λvs.k (x :: vs)
in if p x
then k ′ nil
else visit (xs, k ′ )
in visit (xs, λvs.vs)
find all prefixes c 1 (p, xs)
def
letrec visit (nil , k )
= nil
| visit (x :: xs, k )
= let k ′ = λvs.k (x :: vs)
in if p x
then (k ′ nil) :: (visit (xs, k ′ ))
else visit (xs, k ′ )
in visit (xs, λvs.vs)
=
To find the first prefix, one applies the functional accumulator as soon as a satisfactory list
element is found. To list all such prefixes, one continues the traversal, adding the current
prefix to the list of the remaining prefixes.
Defunctionalizing these two definitions yields the two definitions of Section 3.1.
The functional accumulator is a delimited continuation:
• In find first prefix c 1 , visit is written in CPS since all calls are tail calls and all
sub-computations are elementary. The continuation is initialized in the initial call
to visit, discarded in the base case, extended in the induction case, and used if a
satisfactory prefix is found.
• In find all prefixes c 1 , visit is almost written in CPS except that the continuation is
composed if a satisfactory prefix is found: it is used twice—once where it is applied
to the empty list to construct a prefix, and once in the visit of the rest of the list to
construct a list of prefixes; this prefix is then prepended to this list of prefixes.
These continuation-based programming patterns (initializing a continuation, not using it,
or using it more than once as if it were a composable function) have motivated the control
operators shift and reset [28, 29]. Using them, in the next section, we write visit in direct
style.
3.3. Finding prefixes in direct style. The two following local functions are the directstyle counterpart of the two local functions in Section 3.2:
find first prefix c 0 (p, xs)
def
=
letrec visit nil
= Sk.nil
| visit (x :: xs)
= x :: (if p x then nil else visit xs)
in h visit xsii
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY
find all prefixes c 0 (p, xs)
def
=
9
letrec visit nil
= Sk.nil
| visit (x :: xs)
= x :: if p x
then Sk′ .hhk ′ nilii :: h k′ (visit xs)ii
else visit xs
in h visit xsii
In both cases, visit is in direct style, i.e., it is not passed any continuation. The initial calls
to visit are enclosed in the control delimiter reset (noted h ·ii for conciseness). In the base
cases, the current (delimited) continuation is captured with the control operator shift (noted
S), which has the effect of emptying the (delimited) context; this captured continuation is
bound to an identifier k, which is not used; nil is then returned in the emptied context.
In the induction case of find all prefixes c 0 , if the predicate is satisfied, visit captures the
current continuation and applies it twice—once to the empty list to construct a prefix, and
once to the result of visiting the rest of the list to construct a list of prefixes; this prefix is
then prepended to the list of prefixes.
CPS-transforming these two local functions yields the two definitions of Section 3.2 [29].
3.4. Finding prefixes in continuation-passing style. The two following local functions
are the continuation-passing counterpart of the two local functions in Section 3.2:
def
find first prefix c 2 (p, xs) = letrec visit (nil , k1 , k2 )
= k2 nil
| visit (x :: xs, k1 , k2 )
= let k1′ = λ(vs, k2′ ).k1 (x :: vs, k2′ )
in if p x
then k1′ (nil , k2 )
else visit (xs, k1′ , k2 )
in visit (xs, λ(vs, k2 ).k2 vs, λvs.vs)
def
find all prefixes c 2 (p, xs) = letrec visit (nil , k1 , k2 )
= k2 nil
| visit (x :: xs, k1 , k2 )
= let k1′ = λ(vs, k2′ ).k1 (x :: vs, k2′ )
in if p x
then k1′ (nil , λvs.visit (xs, k1′ , λvss.k2 (vs :: vss)))
else visit (xs, k1′ , k2 )
in visit (xs, λ(vs, k2 ).k2 vs, λvss.vss)
CPS-transforming the two local functions of Section 3.2 adds another layer of continuations and restores the syntactic characterization of all calls being tail calls and all subcomputations being elementary.
3.5. The CPS hierarchy. If k2 were used non-tail recursively in a variant of the examples
of Section 3.4, we could CPS-transform the definitions one more time, adding one more layer
of continuations and restoring the syntactic characterization of all calls being tail calls and
all sub-computations being elementary. We could also map this definition back to direct
style, eliminating k2 but accessing it with shift. If the result were mapped back to direct
10
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
style one more time, k2 would then be accessed with a new control operator, shift2 , and k1
would be accessed with shift (or more precisely with shift1 ).
All in all, successive CPS-transformations induce a CPS hierarchy [28,32], and abstracting control up to each successive layer is achieved with successive pairs of control operators
shift and reset—reset to initialize the continuation up to a level, and shift to capture a
delimited continuation up to this level. Each pair of control operators is indexed by the
corresponding level in the hierarchy. Applying a captured continuation packages all the
current layers on the next layer and restores the captured layers. When a captured continuation completes, the packaged layers are put back into place and the computation proceeds.
(This informal description is made precise in Section 4.)
3.6. A note about typing. The type of find all prefixes c 1 , in Section 3.2, is
(α → bool ) × α list → α list list
and the type of its local function visit is
α list × (α list → α list) → α list list.
In this example, the co-domain of the continuation is not the same as the co-domain of
visit.
Thus find all prefixes c 0 provides a simple and meaningful example where Filinski’s
typing of shift [42] does not fit, since it must be used at type
((β → ans) → ans) → β
for a given type ans, i.e., the answer type of the continuation and the type of the computation must be the same. In other words, control effects are not allowed to change the types
of the contexts. Due to a similar restriction on the type of shift, the example does not fit
either in Murthy’s pseudo-classical type system for the CPS hierarchy [66] and in Wadler’s
most general monadic type system [80, Section 3.4]. It however fits in Danvy and Filinski’s
original type system [27] which Ariola, Herbelin, and Sabry have recently embedded in
classical subtractive logic [5].
3.7. Related work. The example considered in this section builds on the simpler function
that unconditionally lists the successive prefixes of a given list. This simpler function is a
traditional example of delimited continuations [21, 73]:
• In the Lisp Pointers [21], Danvy presents three versions of this function: a typed
continuation-passing version (corresponding to Section 3.2), one with delimited control (corresponding to Section 3.3), and one in assembly language.
• In his PhD thesis [73, Section 6.3], Sitaram presents two versions of this function:
one with an accumulator (corresponding to Section 3.1) and one with delimited
control (corresponding to Section 3.3).
In Section 3.2, we have shown that the continuation-passing version mediates the version
with an accumulator and the version with delimited control since defunctionalizing the
continuation-passing version yields one and mapping it back to direct style yields the other.
3.8. Summary and conclusion. We have illustrated delimited continuations with the
classic example of finding list prefixes, using CPS as a guideline. Direct-style programs using
shift and reset can be CPS-transformed into continuation-passing programs where some
calls may not be tail calls and some sub-computations may not be elementary. One more
CPS transformation establishes this syntactic property with a second layer of continuations.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 11
• Terms: term ∋ t ::= pmq | x | λx .t | t0 t1 | succ t | h tii | Sk .t
• Values: val ∋ v ::= m | f
• Answers, meta-continuations, continuations and functions:
ans = val
k2 ∈ cont2 = val → ans
k1 ∈ cont1 = val × cont2 → ans
f ∈ fun = val × cont1 × cont2 → ans
• Initial continuation and meta-continuation: θ1 = λ(v, k2 ). k2 v
θ2 = λv. v
• Environments: env ∋ e ::= eempty | e[x 7→ v]
• Evaluation function: eval : term × env × cont1 × cont2 → ans
eval (pmq,
eval (x ,
eval (λx .t,
eval (t0 t1 ,
eval (succ t,
eval (hhtii ,
eval (Sk.t,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
k1 ,
k1 ,
k1 ,
k1 ,
k1 ,
k1 ,
k1 ,
k2 )
k2 )
k2 )
k2 )
k2 )
k2 )
k2 )
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
k1 (m, k2 )
k1 (e(x ), k2 )
k1 (λ(v, k1′ , k2′ ). eval (t, e[x 7→ v], k1′ , k2′ ), k2 )
eval (t0 , e, λ(f, k2′ ). eval (t1 , e, λ(v, k2′′ ). f (v, k1 , k2′′ ), k2′ ), k2 )
eval (t, e, λ(m, k2′ ). k1 (m + 1, k2′ ), k2 )
eval (t, e, θ1 , λv. k1 (v, k2 ))
eval (t, e[k 7→ c], θ1 , k2 )
where c = λ(v, k1′ , k2′ ). k1 (v, λv ′ . k1′ (v ′ , k2′ ))
• Main function: evaluate : term → val
evaluate (t) = eval (t, eempty , θ1 , θ2 )
Figure 6: An environment-based evaluator for the first level of the CPS hierarchy
Further CPS transformations provide the extra layers of continuation that are characteristic
of the CPS hierarchy.
In the next section, we specify the λ-calculus extended with shift and reset.
4. From evaluator to reduction semantics for delimited continuations
We derive a reduction semantics for the call-by-value λ-calculus extended with shift and
reset, using the method demonstrated in Section 2. First, we transform an evaluator into
an environment-based abstract machine. Then we eliminate the environment from this
abstract machine, making it substitution-based. Finally, we read all the components of a
reduction semantics off the substitution-based abstract machine.
Terms consist of integer literals, variables, λ-abstractions, function applications, applications of the successor function, reset expressions, and shift expressions:
t ::= pmq | x | λx .t | t0 t1 | succ t | h tii | Sk .t
Programs are closed terms.
12
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
This source language is a subset of the language used in the examples of Section 3.
Adding the remaining constructs is a straightforward exercise and does not contribute to
our point here.
4.1. An environment-based evaluator. Figure 6 displays an evaluator for the language
of the first level of the CPS hierarchy. This evaluation function represents the original
call-by-value semantics of the λ-calculus with shift and reset [28], augmented with integer
literals and applications of the successor function. It is defined by structural induction
over the syntax of terms, and it makes use of an environment e, a continuation k1 , and a
meta-continuation k2 .
The evaluation of a terminating program that does not get stuck (i.e., a program where
no ill-formed applications occur in the course of evaluation) yields either an integer, a
function representing a λ-abstraction, or a captured continuation. Both evaluate and eval
are partial functions to account for non-terminating or stuck programs. The environment
stores previously computed values of the free variables of the term under evaluation.
The meta-continuation intervenes to interpret reset expressions and to apply captured
continuations. Otherwise, it is passively threaded through the evaluation of literals, variables, λ-abstractions, function applications, and applications of the successor function. (If
it were not for shift and reset, and if eval were curried, k2 could be eta-reduced and the
evaluator would be in ordinary continuation-passing style.)
The reset control operator is used to delimit control. A reset expression h tii is interpreted by evaluating t with the initial continuation and a meta-continuation on which the
current continuation has been “pushed.” (Indeed, and as will be shown in Section 4.2,
defunctionalizing the meta-continuation yields the data type of a stack [30].)
The shift control operator is used to abstract (delimited) control. A shift expression
Sk.t is interpreted by capturing the current continuation, binding it to k, and evaluating t
in an environment extended with k and with a continuation reset to the initial continuation.
Applying a captured continuation is achieved by “pushing” the current continuation on the
meta-continuation and applying the captured continuation to the new meta-continuation.
Resuming a continuation is achieved by reactivating the “pushed” continuation with the
corresponding meta-continuation.
4.2. An environment-based abstract machine. The evaluator displayed in Figure 6
is already in continuation-passing style. Therefore, we only need to defunctionalize its expressible values and its continuations to obtain an abstract machine. This abstract machine
is displayed in Figure 7.
The abstract machine consists of three sets of transitions: eval for interpreting terms,
cont 1 for interpreting the defunctionalized continuations (i.e., the evaluation contexts),1 and
cont 2 for interpreting the defunctionalized meta-continuations (i.e., the meta-contexts).2
The set of possible values includes integers, closures and captured contexts. In the original
1The grammar of evaluation contexts in Figure 7 is isomorphic to the grammar of evaluation contexts in
the standard inside-out notation:
C1
::=
[ ] | C1 [[ ] (t, e)] | C1 [succ [ ]] | C1 [v [ ]]
2To build on Peyton Jones’s terminology [62], this abstract machine is therefore in ‘eval/apply/metaapply’ form.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 13
evaluator, the latter two were represented as higher-order functions, but defunctionalizing
expressible values of the evaluator has led them to be distinguished.
This eval/apply/meta-apply abstract machine is an extension of the CEK machine [39],
which is an eval/apply machine, with the meta-context C2 and its two transitions, and
the two transitions for shift and reset. C2 intervenes to process reset expressions and to
apply captured continuations. Otherwise, it is passively threaded through the processing of
literals, variables, λ-abstractions, function applications, and applications of the successor
function. (If it were not for shift and reset, C2 and its transitions could be omitted and the
abstract machine would reduce to the CEK machine.)
Given an environment e, a context C1 , and a meta-context C2 , a reset expression h tii
is processed by evaluating t with the same environment e, the empty context •, and a
meta-context where C1 has been pushed on C2 .
Given an environment e, a context C1 , and a meta-context C2 , a shift expression Sk.t is
processed by evaluating t with an extension of e where k denotes C1 , the empty context [ ],
and a meta-context C2 . Applying a captured context C1′ is achieved by pushing the current
context C1 on the current meta-context C2 and continuing with C1′ . Resuming a context
C1 is achieved by popping it off the meta-context C2 · C1 and continuing with C1 .
The correctness of the abstract machine with respect to the evaluator is a consequence
of the correctness of defunctionalization. In order to express it formally, we define a partial
function evale mapping a term t to a value v whenever the environment-based machine,
started with t, stops with v. The following theorem states this correctness by relating
observable results:
Theorem 1. For any program t and any integer value m, evaluate (t) = m if and only if
evale (t) = m.
Proof. The theorem follows directly from the correctness of defunctionalization [10, 67].
The environment-based abstract machine can serve both as a foundation for implementing functional languages with control operators for delimited continuations and as a
stepping stone in theoretical studies of shift and reset. In the rest of this section, we use it
to construct a reduction semantics of shift and reset.
4.3. A substitution-based abstract machine. The environment-based abstract machine of Figure 7, on which we want to base our development, makes a distinction between
terms and values. Since a reduction semantics is specified by purely syntactic operations
(it gives meaning to terms by specifying their rewriting strategy and an appropriate notion
of reduction, and is indeed also referred to as ‘syntactic theory’), we need to embed the
domain of values back into the syntax. To this end we transform the environment-based
abstract machine into the substitution-based abstract machine displayed in Figure 8. The
transformation is standard, except that we also need to embed evaluation contexts in the
syntax; hence the substitution-based machine operates on terms where “quoted” (in the
sense of Lisp) contexts can occur. (If it were not for shift and reset, C2 and its transitions
could be omitted and the abstract machine would reduce to the CK machine [39].)
We write t{v/x } to denote the result of the usual capture-avoiding substitution of the
value v for x in t.
Formally, the relationship between the two machines is expressed with the following
simulation theorem, where evaluation with the substitution-based abstract machine is captured by the partial function evals , defined analogously to evale .
14
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
• Terms: t ::= pmq | x | λx .t | t0 t1 | succ t | h tii | Sk .t
• Values (integers, closures, and captured continuations): v ::= m | [x , t, e] | C1
• Environments: e ::= eempty | e[x 7→ v]
• Evaluation contexts: C1 ::= [ ] | ARG((t, e), C1 ) | SUCC(C1 ) | FUN(v, C1 )
• Meta-contexts: C2 ::= • | C2 · C1
• Initial transition, transition rules, and final transition:
t ⇒ ht, eempty , [ ], •ieval
hpmq,
hx ,
hλx .t,
ht0 t1 ,
hsucc t,
hhhtii ,
hSk .t,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
h[ ], v,
hARG((t, e), C1 ), v,
hSUCC(C1 ), m,
hFUN([x , t, e], C1 ), v,
hFUN(C1′ , C1 ), v,
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
hC1 , m, C2 icont1
hC1 , e (x ), C2 icont1
hC1 , [x , t, e], C2 icont1
ht0 , e, ARG((t1 , e), C1 ), C2 ieval
ht, e, SUCC(C1 ), C2 ieval
ht, e, [ ], C2 · C1 ieval
ht, e[k 7→ C1 ], [ ], C2 ieval
C2 icont1
C2 icont1
C2 icont1
C2 icont1
C2 icont1
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
hC2 , vicont2
ht, e, FUN(v, C1 ), C2 ieval
hC1 , m + 1, C2 icont1
ht, e[x 7→ v], C1 , C2 ieval
hC1′ , v, C2 · C1 icont1
hC2 · C1 , vicont2
h•, vicont2
⇒ hC1 , v, C2 icont1
⇒ v
Figure 7: An environment-based abstract machine for the first level of the CPS hierarchy
Theorem 2. For any program t, either both evals (t) and evale (t) are undefined, or there
exist values v, v ′ such that evals (t) = v, evale (t) = v ′ and T (v ′ ) = v. The function T relates
a semantic value with its syntactic representation and is defined as follows:3
T (m) = pmq
T ([x , t, e]) = λx .t{T (e(x1 ))/x1 } . . . {T (e(xn ))/xn },
where F V (λx . t) = {x1 , . . . , xn }
T ([ ]) = [ ]
T (ARG((t, e), C1 )) = ARG(t{T (e(x1 ))/x1 } . . . {T (e(xn ))/xn }, T (C1 )),
where F V (t) = {x1 , . . . , xn }
T (FUN(v, C1 )) = FUN(T (v), T (C1 ))
T (SUCC(C1 )) = SUCC(T (C1 ))
3T is a generalization of Plotkin’s function Real [68].
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 15
• Terms and values:
t ::= v | x | t0 t1 | succ t | h tii | Sk .t
v ::= pmq | λx .t | C1
• Evaluation contexts: C1 ::= [ ] | ARG(t, C1 ) | SUCC(C1 ) | FUN(v, C1 )
• Meta-contexts: C2 ::= • | C2 · C1
• Initial transition, transition rules, and final transition:
t ⇒ ht, [ ], •ieval
hpmq,
hλx .t,
hC1′ ,
ht0 t1 ,
hsucc t,
hhhtii ,
hSk .t,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
h[ ], v,
hARG(t, C1 ), v,
hSUCC(C1 ), pmq,
hFUN(λx .t, C1 ), v,
hFUN(C1′ , C1 ), v,
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
C2 ieval
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
hC1 , pmq, C2 icont1
hC1 , λx .t, C2 icont1
hC1 , C1′ , C2 icont1
ht0 , ARG(t1 , C1 ), C2 ieval
ht, SUCC(C1 ), C2 ieval
ht, [ ], C2 · C1 ieval
ht{C1 /k }, [ ], C2 ieval
C2 icont1
C2 icont1
C2 icont1
C2 icont1
C2 icont1
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
hC2 , vicont2
ht, FUN(v, C1 ), C2 ieval
hC1 , pm + 1q, C2 icont1
ht{v/x }, C1 , C2 ieval
hC1′ , v, C2 · C1 icont1
hC2 · C1 , vicont2
h•, vicont2
⇒ hC1 , v, C2 icont1
⇒ v
Figure 8: A substitution-based abstract machine for the first level of the CPS hierarchy
Proof. We extend the translation function T to meta-contexts and configurations, in the
expected way, e.g.,
T (ht, e, C1 , C2 ieval ) = ht{T (e(x1 ))/x1 } . . . {T (e(xn ))/xn }, T (C1 ), T (C2 )ieval
where F V (t) = {x1 , . . . , xn }
Then it is straightforward to show that the two abstract machines operate in lock step with
respect to the translation. Hence, for any program t, both machines diverge or they both
stop (after the same number of transitions) with the values v and T (v), respectively.
We now proceed to analyze the transitions of the machine displayed in Figure 8. We
can think of a configuration ht, C1 , C2 ieval as the following decomposition of the initial term
into a meta-context C2 , a context C1 , and an intermediate term t:
C2 # C1 [t]
where # separates the context and the meta-context. Each transition performs either a
reduction, or a decomposition in search of the next redex. Let us recall that a decomposition
is performed when both sides of a transition are partitions of the same term; in that case,
depending on the structure of the decomposition C2 # C1 [t], a subpart of the term is chosen
16
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
to be evaluated next, and the contexts are updated accordingly. We also observe that eval transitions follow the structure of t, cont 1 -transitions follow the structure of C1 when the
term has been reduced to a value, and cont 2 -transitions follow the structure of C2 when a
value in the empty context has been reached.
Next we specify all the components of the reduction semantics based on the analysis of
the abstract machine.
4.4. A reduction semantics. A reduction semantics provides a reduction relation on
expressions by defining values, evaluation contexts, and redexes [36, 38, 39, 82]. In the
present case,
• the values are already specified in the (substitution-based) abstract machine:
v ::= pmq | λx .t | C1
• the evaluation contexts and meta-contexts are already specified in the abstract machine, as the data-type part of defunctionalized continuations;
C1 ::= [ ] | ARG(t, C1 ) | FUN(v, C1 ) | SUCC(C1 )
C2 ::= • | C2 · C1
• we can read the redexes off the transitions of the abstract machine:
r ::= succ pmq | (λx .t) v | Sk .t | C1′ v | h vii
Based on the distinction between decomposition and reduction, we single out the following reduction rules from the transitions of the machine:
(δ)
(βλ )
(Sλ )
(βctx )
(Reset)
C2 # C1 [succ pmq]
C2 # C1 [(λx .t) v]
C2 # C1 [Sk .t]
C2 # C1 [C1′ v]
C2 # C1 [hhvii ]
→
→
→
→
→
C2 # C1 [pm + 1q]
C2 # C1 [t{v/x }]
C2 # [t{C1 /k }]
C2 · C1 # C1′ [v]
C2 # C1 [v]
(βλ ) is the usual call-by-value β-reduction; we have renamed it to indicate that the applied
term is a λ-abstraction, since we can also apply a captured context, as in (βctx ). (Sλ ) is
plausibly symmetric to (βλ ) — it can be seen as an application of the abstraction λk .t to
the current context. Moreover, (βctx ) can be seen as performing both a reduction and a
decomposition: it is a reduction because an application of a context with a hole to a value
is reduced to the value plugged into the hole; and it is a decomposition because it changes
the meta-context, as if the application were enclosed in a reset. Finally, (Reset) makes
it possible to pass the boundary of a context when the term inside this context has been
reduced to a value.
The βctx -rule and the Sλ -rule give a justification for representing a captured context C1
as a term λx .hhC1 [x ]ii, as found in other studies of shift and reset [55, 56, 66]. In particular,
the need for delimiting the captured context is a consequence of the βctx -rule.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 17
Finally, we can read the decomposition
machine:
decompose (t) =
decompose ′ (t0 t1 , C1 , C2 ) =
decompose ′ (succ t, C1 , C2 ) =
decompose ′ (hhtii , C1 , C2 ) =
decompose ′ (v, ARG(t, C1 ), C2 ) =
function off the transitions of the abstract
decompose ′ (t, [ ], •)
decompose ′ (t0 , ARG(t1 , C1 ), C2 )
decompose ′ (t, SUCC(C1 ), C2 )
decompose ′ (t, [ ], C2 · C1 )
decompose ′ (t, FUN(v, C1 ), C2 )
In the remaining cases either a value or a redex has been found:
decompose ′ (v, [ ], •)
decompose ′ (v, [ ], C2 · C1 )
decompose ′ (Sk .t, C1 , C2 )
decompose ′ (v, FUN((λx .t), C1 ), C2 )
decompose ′ (v, FUN(C1′ , C1 ), C2 )
decompose ′ (pmq, SUCC(C1 ), C2 )
=
=
=
=
=
=
• # [v]
C2 # C1 [hhvii ]
C2 # C1 [Sk .t]
C2 # C1 [(λx .t) v]
C2 # C1 [C1′ v]
C2 # C1 [succ pmq]
An inverse of the decompose function, traditionally called plug , reconstructs a term
from its decomposition:
plug (• # [t])
plug (C2 · C1 # [t])
plug (C2 # (ARG(t′ , C1 ))[t])
plug (C2 # (FUN(v, C1 ))[t])
plug (C2 # (SUCC(C1 ))[t])
=
=
=
=
=
t
plug (C2
plug (C2
plug (C2
plug (C2
#
#
#
#
C1 [hhtii ])
C1 [t t′ ])
C1 [v t])
C1 [succ t])
In order to talk about unique decomposition, we need to define the set of potential
redexes (i.e., the disjoint union of actual redexes and stuck redexes). The grammar of
potential redexes reads as follows:
p ::= succ v | v0 v1 | Sk .t | h vii
Lemma 1 (Unique decomposition). A program t is either a value v or there exist a
unique context C1 , a unique meta-context C2 and a potential redex p such that t =
plug (C2 # C1 [p]). In the former case decompose (t) = • # [v] and in the latter case either
decompose (t) = C2 # C1 [p] if p is an actual redex, or decompose (t) is undefined.
Proof. The first part follows by induction on the structure of t. The second part follows
from the equation decompose (plug (C2 # C1 [r])) = C2 # C1 [r] which holds for all C2 , C1 and
r.
It is evident that evaluating a program either using the derived reduction rules or using
the substitution-based abstract machine yields the same result.
Theorem 3. For any program t and any value v, evals (t) = v if and only if t →∗ v, where
→∗ is the reflexive, transitive closure of the one-step reduction defined by the relation →.
Proof. When evaluating with the abstract machine, each contraction is followed by decomposing the contractum in the current context and meta-context. When evaluating with
the reduction rules, however, each contraction is followed by plugging the contractum and
decomposing the resulting term. Therefore, the theorem follows from the equation
decompose ′ (t, C1 , C2 ) = decompose (plug (C2 # C1 [t]))
which holds for any C2 , C1 and t.
18
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
We have verified that using refocusing [16,31], one can go from this reduction semantics
to the abstract machine of Figure 8.
4.5. Beyond CPS. Alternatively to using the meta-context to compose delimited continuations, as in Figure 7, we could compose them by concatenating their representation [41].
Such a concatenation function is defined as follows:
[ ] ⋆ C1′
(ARG((t, e), C1 )) ⋆ C1′
(SUCC(C1 )) ⋆ C1′
(FUN(v, C1 )) ⋆ C1′
=
=
=
=
C1′
ARG((t, e), C1 ⋆ C1′ )
SUCC(C1 ⋆ C1′ )
FUN(v, C1 ⋆ C1′ )
(The second clause would read (ARG(t, C1 )) ⋆ C1′ = ARG(t, C1 ⋆ C1′ ) for the contexts of
Figure 8.)
Then, in Figures 7 and 8, we could replace the transition
hFUN(C1′ , C1 ), v, C2 icont1
⇒ hC1′ , v, C2 · C1 icont1
hFUN(C1′ , C1 ), v, C2 icont1
⇒ hC1′ ⋆ C1 , v, C2 icont1
by the following one:
This replacement changes the control effect of shift to that of Felleisen et al.’s F operator [37]. Furthermore, the modified abstract machine is in structural correspondence with
Felleisen et al.’s abstract machine for F and # [37, 41].
This representation of control (as a list of ‘stack frames’) and this implementation of
composing delimited continuations (by concatenating these lists) are at the heart of virtually
all non-CPS-based accounts of delimited control. However, the modified environment-based
abstract machine does not correspond to a defunctionalized continuation-passing evaluator
because it is not in the range of defunctionalization [30] since the first-order representation
of functions should have a single point of consumption. Here, the constructors of contexts
are not solely consumed by the cont1 transitions of the abstract machine as in Figures 7
and 8, but also by ⋆. Therefore, the abstract machine that uses ⋆ is not in the range of
Reynolds’s defunctionalization and it thus does not immediately correspond to a higherorder, continuation-passing evaluator. In that sense, control operators using ⋆ go beyond
CPS.
Elsewhere [18], we have rephrased the modified abstract machine to put it in defunctionalized form, and we have exhibited the corresponding higher-order evaluator and the
corresponding ‘dynamic’ continuation-passing style. This dynamic CPS is not just plain
CPS but is a form of continuation+state-passing style where the threaded state is a list of
intermediate delimited continuations. Unexpectedly, it is also in structural correspondence
with the architecture for delimited control recently proposed by Dybvig, Peyton Jones, and
Sabry on other operational grounds [35].
4.6. Static vs. dynamic delimited continuations. Irrespectively of any new dynamic
CPS and any new architecture for delimited control, there seems to be remarkably few
examples that actually illustrate the expressive power of dynamic delimited continuations.
We have recently presented one, breadth-first traversal [19], and we present another one
below.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 19
The two following functions traverse a given list and return another list. The recursive
call to visit is abstracted into a delimited continuation, which is applied to the tail of the
list:
foo xs
def
=
letrec visit nil
= nil
| visit (x :: xs)
= visit (Sk .x :: (k xs))
in h visit xsii
bar xs
def
=
letrec visit nil
= nil
| visit (x :: xs)
= visit (Fk .x :: (k xs))
in h visit xsii
On the left, foo uses S and on the right, bar uses F; for the rest, the two definitions are
identical. Given an input list, foo copies it and bar reverses it.
To explain this difference and to account for the extended source language, we need to
expand the grammar of evaluation contexts, e.g., with a production to account for calls to
the list constructor:
C1 ::= [ ] | ARG(t, C1 ) | SUCC(C1 ) | FUN(v, C1 ) | CONS(v, C1 ) | . . .
Similarly, we need to expand the definition of concatenation as follows:
(CONS(v, C1 )) ⋆ C1′ = CONS(v, C1 ⋆ C1′ )
Here is a trace of the two computations in the form of the calls to and returns from
visit for the input list 1 :: 2 :: nil :
foo: Every time the captured continuation is resumed, its representation is kept separate from the current context. The meta-context therefore grows whereas the
captured context solely consists of FUN(visit, [ ]) throughout (writing visit in the
context for simplicity):
C2
C2 · C1
C2 · C1 · (CONS(1, [ ]))
C2 · C1 · (CONS(1, [ ])) · (CONS(2, [ ]))
C2 · C1 · (CONS(1, [ ])) · (CONS(2, [ ]))
C2 · C1 · (CONS(1, [ ]))
C2 · C1
C2
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
C1 [hhvisit (1 :: 2 :: nil )ii]
[visit (1 :: 2 :: nil)]
[visit (2 :: nil )]
[visit nil ]
[nil ]
[2 :: nil ]
[1 :: 2 :: nil]
C1 [1 :: 2 :: nil ]
bar : Every time the captured continuation is resumed, its representation is concatenated to the current context. The meta-context therefore remains the same whereas
the context changes dynamically. The first captured context is FUN(visit, [ ]); concatenating it to CONS(1, [ ]) yields CONS(1, FUN(visit, [ ])), which is the second
captured context:
C2
C2 · C1
C2 · C1
C2 · C1
C2 · C1
C2 · C1
C2 · C1
C2
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
C1 [hhvisit (1 :: 2 :: nil )ii]
[visit (1 :: 2 :: nil)]
(CONS(1, [ ]))[visit (2 :: nil )]
(CONS(2, CONS(1, [ ])))[visit nil]
(CONS(2, CONS(1, [ ])))[nil ]
(CONS(2, [ ]))[1 :: nil ]
[2 :: 1 :: nil]
C1 [2 :: 1 :: nil ]
20
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
4.7. Summary and conclusion. We have presented the original evaluator for the λcalculus with shift and reset; this evaluator uses two layers of continuations. From this
call-by-value evaluator we have derived two abstract machines, an environment-based one
and a substitution-based one; each of these machines uses two layers of evaluation contexts.
Based on the substitution-based machine we have constructed a reduction semantics for
the λ-calculus with shift and reset; this reduction semantics, by construction, is sound with
respect to CPS. Finally, we have pointed out the difference between the static and dynamic
delimited control operators at the level of the abstract machine and we have presented a
simple but meaningful example illustrating their differing behavior.
5. From evaluator to reduction semantics for the CPS hierarchy
We construct a reduction semantics for the call-by-value λ-calculus extended with shiftn
and resetn . As in Section 4, we go from an evaluator to an environment-based abstract
machine, and from a substitution-based abstract machine to a reduction semantics. Because of the regularity of CPS, the results can be generalized from level 1 to higher levels
without repeating the actual construction, based only on the original specification of the
hierarchy [28]. In particular, the proofs of the theorems generalize straightforwardly from
level 1.
5.1. An environment-based evaluator. At the nth level of the hierarchy, the language
is extended with operators shifti and reseti for all i such that 1 ≤ i ≤ n. The evaluator
for this language is shown in Figures 9 and 10. If n = 1, it coincides with the evaluator
displayed in Figure 6.
The evaluator uses n+1 layers of continuations. In the five first clauses (literal, variable,
λ-abstraction, function application, and application of the successor function), the continuations k2 , . . . , kn+1 are passive: if the evaluator were curried, they could be eta-reduced.
In the clauses defining shifti and reseti , the continuations ki+2 , . . . , kn+1 are also passive.
Each pair of control operators is indexed by the corresponding level in the hierarchy: reseti
is used to “push” each successive continuation up to level i onto level i+ 1 and to reinitialize
• Terms (1 ≤ i ≤ n): term ∋ t ::= pmq | x | λx .t | t0 t1 | succ t | h tiii | Si k .t
• Values: val ∋ v ::= m | f
• Answers, continuations and functions (1 ≤ i ≤ n):
ans
kn+1 ∈ contn+1
ki ∈ conti
f ∈ fun
=
=
=
=
val
val → ans
val × conti+1 × . . . × contn+1 → ans
val × cont1 × . . . × contn+1 → ans
• Initial continuations (1 ≤ i ≤ n):
θi = λ(v, ki+1 , ki+2 , . . ., kn+1 ). ki+1 (v, ki+2 , . . ., kn+1 )
θn+1 = λv. v
• Environments: env ∋ e ::= eempty | e[x 7→ v]
• Evaluation function: see Figure 10
Figure 9: An environment-based evaluator for the CPS hierarchy at level n
evaln (pmq, e, k1 , k2 , ..., kn+1 ) = k1 (m, k2 , ..., kn+1 )
evaln (x , e, k1 , k2 , ..., kn+1 ) = k1 (e(x ), k2 , ..., kn+1 )
′
′
), k2 , ..., kn+1 )
). evaln (t, e[x 7→ v], k1′ , k2′ , ..., kn+1
evaln (λx .t, e, k1 , k2 , ..., kn+1 ) = k1 (λ(v, k1′ , k2′ , ..., kn+1
evaln (t0 t1 , e, k1 , k2 , ..., kn+1 ) = evaln (t0 , e,
′
). evaln (t1 , e,
λ(f, k2′ , ..., kn+1
′′ ). f (v, k , k ′′ , ..., k ′′ ),
λ(v, k2′′ , ..., kn+1
1
n+1
2
′
′
k2 , ..., kn+1 ),
k2 , ..., kn+1 )
′
′
evaln (succ t, e, k1 , k2 , ..., kn+1 ) = evaln (t, e, λ(m, k2′ , ..., kn+1
). k1 (m + 1, k2′ , ..., kn+1
), k2 , ..., kn+1 )
′ , ..., k ′
′
′
evaln (hhtiii , e, k1 , k2 , ..., kn+1 ) = evaln (t, e, θ1 , . . ., θi , λ(v, ki+2 , ..., kn+1 ). k1 (v, k2 , ..., ki+1 , ki+2
n+1 ), ki+2 , ..., kn+1 )
evaln (Si k.t, e, k1 , k2 , ..., kn+1 ) = evaln (t, e[k 7→ ci ], θ1 , ..., θi , ki+1 , ..., kn+1 )
′
′′
′′
′
′′
′′
′
′
where ci = λ(v, k1′ , ..., kn+1
). k1 (v, k2 , ..., ki , λ(v ′ , ki+2
, ..., kn+1
). k1′ (v ′ , k2′ , ..., ki+1
, ki+2
, ..., kn+1
), ki+2
, ..., kn+1
)
• Main function: evaluaten : term → val
evaluaten (t) = evaln (t, eempty , θ1 , ..., θn , θn+1 )
Figure 10: An environment-based evaluator for the CPS hierarchy at level n, ctd.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 21
• Evaluation function (1 ≤ i ≤ n): evaln : term × env × cont1 × . . . × contn+1 → ans
22
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
them with θ1 , . . . , θi , which are the successive CPS counterparts of the identity function;
shifti is used to abstract control up to level i into a delimited continuation and to reinitialize
the successive continuations up to level i with θ1 , . . . , θi .
Applying a delimited continuation that was abstracted up to level i “pushes” each
successive continuation up to level i onto level i + 1 and restores the successive continuations that were captured in a delimited continuation. When such a delimited continuation
completes, and when an expression delimited by reseti completes, the successive continuations that were pushed onto level i + 1 are “popped” back into place and the computation
proceeds.
5.2. An environment-based abstract machine. Defunctionalizing the evaluator of Figures 9 and 10 yields the environment-based abstract machine displayed in Figures 11 and
12. If n = 1, it coincides with the abstract machine displayed in Figure 7.
The abstract machine consists of n + 2 sets of transitions: eval for interpreting terms
and cont 1 , . . . , cont n+1 for interpreting the successive defunctionalized continuations. The
set of possible values includes integers, closures and captured contexts.
This abstract machine is an extension of the abstract machine displayed in Figure 7
with n + 1 contexts instead of 2 and the corresponding transitions for shifti and reseti .
Each metai+1 -context intervenes to process reseti expressions and to apply captured continuations. Otherwise, the successive contexts are passively threaded to process literals,
variables, λ-abstractions, function applications, and applications of the successor function.
Given an environment e and a series of successive contexts, a reseti expression h tiii is
processed by evaluating t with the same environment e, i empty contexts, and a metai+1 context over which all the intermediate contexts have been pushed on.
Given an environment e and a series of successive contexts, a shift expression Si k.t
is processed by evaluating t with an extension of e where k denotes a composition of the
i surrounding contexts, i empty contexts, and the remaining outer contexts. Applying a
captured context is achieved by pushing all the current contexts on the next outer context,
restoring the composition of the captured contexts, and continuing with them. Resuming
a composition of captured contexts is achieved by popping them off the next outer context
and continuing with them.
In order to relate the resulting abstract machine to the evaluator, we define a partial
function evalen mapping a term t to a value v whenever the machine for level n, started with
• Terms (1 ≤ i ≤ n): t ::= pmq | x | λx .t | t0 t1 | succ t | h tiii | Si k .t
• Values (1 ≤ i ≤ n): v ::= m | [x , t, e] | Ci
• Evaluation contexts (2 ≤ i ≤ n + 1):
C1 ::= [ ] | ARG((t, e), C1 ) | SUCC(C1 ) | FUN(v, C1 )
Ci ::= [ ] | Ci · Ci−1
• Environments: e ::= eempty | e[x 7→ v]
• Initial transition, transition rules, and final transition: see Figure 12
Figure 11: An environment-based abstract machine for the CPS hierarchy at level n
t ⇒ ht, eempty , [ ], [ ], ..., [ ]ieval
hpmq,
hx ,
hλx .t,
ht0 t1 ,
hsucc t,
hhhtiii ,
hSi k .t,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
e,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
h[ ], v,
hARG((t, e), C1 ), v,
hSUCC(C1 ), m,
hFUN([x , t, e], C1 ), v,
hFUN(Ci′ · (...(C2′ · C1′ )...), C1 ), v,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
hC1 , m, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
hC1 , e (x ), C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
hC1 , [x , t, e], C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
ht0 , e, ARG((t1 , e), C1 ), C2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
ht, e, SUCC(C1 ), C2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
ht, e, [ ], ..., [ ], Ci+1 · (...(C2 · C1 )...), Ci+2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
ht, e[k 7→ Ci · (...(C2 · C1 )...)], [ ], ..., [ ], Ci+1 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 icont1
Cn+1 icont1
Cn+1 icont1
Cn+1 icont1
Cn+1 icont1
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
hC2 , v, C3 , ..., Cn+1 icont2
ht, e, FUN(v, C1 ), C2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
hC1 , m + 1, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
ht, e[x 7→ v], C1 , C2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
hC1′ , v, C2′ , ..., Ci′ , Ci+1 · (...(C2 · C1 )...), Ci+2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
h[ ], v, Cj+1 , ..., Cn+1 icontj
hCj · (...(C2 · C1 )...), v, Cj+1 , ..., Cn+1 icontj
hCn+1 · (...(C2 · C1 )...), vicontn+1
h[ ], vicontn+1
⇒ hCj+1 , v, Cj+2 , ..., Cn+1 icontj +1
⇒ hC1 , v, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
⇒ hC1 , v, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
⇒ v
Figure 12: An environment-based abstract machine for the CPS hierarchy at level n, ctd.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 23
• Initial transition, transition rules, and final transition (1 ≤ i ≤ n, 2 ≤ j ≤ n):
24
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
t, stops with v. The correctness of the machine with respect to the evaluator is ensured by
the following theorem:
Theorem 4. For any program t and any integer value m, evaluaten (t) = m if and only if
evalen (t) = m.
5.3. A substitution-based abstract machine. In the same fashion as in Section 4.3, we
construct the substitution-based abstract machine corresponding to the environment-based
abstract machine of Section 5.2. The result is displayed in Figures 13 and 14. If n = 1, it
coincides with the abstract machine displayed in Figure 8.
The nth level contains n + 1 evaluation contexts and each context Ci can be viewed as
a stack of non-empty contexts Ci−1 . Terms are decomposed as
Cn+1 #n Cn #n−1 Cn−1 #n−2 · · · #2 C2 #1 C1 [t],
where each #i represents a context delimiter of level i. All the control operators that occur
at the jth level (with j < n) of the hierarchy do not use the contexts j + 2, . . . , n + 1. The
functions decompose and its inverse plug can be read off the machine, as for level 1.
The transitions of the machine for level j are “embedded” in the machine for level j + 1;
the extra components are threaded but not used.
We define a partial function evalsn capturing the evaluation by the substitution-based
abstract machine for an arbitrary level n, analogously to the definition of evalen . Now we can
relate evaluation with the environment-based and the substitution-based abstract machines
for level n.
Theorem 5. For any program t, either both evalsn (t) and evalen (t) are undefined, or there
exist values v, v ′ such that evalsn (t) = v, evalen (t) = v ′ and Tn (v ′ ) = v.
The definition of Tn extends that of T from Theorem 2 in such a way that it is homomorphic for all the contexts Ci , with 2 ≤ i ≤ n.
5.4. A reduction semantics. Along the same lines as in Section 4.4, we construct the
reduction semantics for the CPS hierarchy based on the abstract machine of Figures 13
and 14. For an arbitrary level n we obtain the following set of reduction rules, for all
• Terms and values (1 ≤ i ≤ n):
t ::= v | x | t0 t1 | succ t | h tiii | Si k .t
v ::= pmq | λx .t | Ci
• Evaluation contexts (2 ≤ i ≤ n + 1):
C1 ::= [ ] | ARG(t, C1 ) | SUCC(C1 ) | FUN(v, C1 )
Ci ::= [ ] | Ci · Ci−1
• Initial transition, transition rules, and final transition: see Figure 14
Figure 13: A substitution-based abstract machine for the CPS hierarchy at level n
t ⇒ ht, [ ], [ ], ..., [ ]ieval
hpmq,
hλx .t,
hCi′ ,
ht0 t1 ,
hsucc t,
hhhtiii ,
hSi k .t,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
C1 ,
h[ ], v,
hARG(t, C1 ), v,
hSUCC(C1 ), pmq,
hFUN((λx .t), C1 ), v,
hFUN(Ci′ · (...(C2′ · C1′ )...), C1 ), v,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
C2 ,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
...,
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 ieval
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
hC1 , pmq, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
hC1 , λx .t, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
hC1 , Ci′ , C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
ht0 , ARG((t1 , e), C1 ), C2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
ht, SUCC(C1 ), C2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
ht, [ ], ..., [ ], Ci+1 · (...(C2 · C1 )...), Ci+2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
ht{Ci · (...(C2 · C1 )...)/k }, [ ], ..., [ ], Ci+1 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
Cn+1 icont1
Cn+1 icont1
Cn+1 icont1
Cn+1 icont1
Cn+1 icont1
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
⇒
hC2 , v, C3 , ..., Cn+1 icont2
ht, FUN(v, C1 ), C2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
hC1 , pm + 1q, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
ht{v/x }, C1 , C2 , ..., Cn+1 ieval
hC1′ , v, C2′ , ..., Ci′ , Ci+1 · (...(C2 · C1 )...), Ci+2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
h[ ], v, Cj+1 , ..., Cn+1 icontj
hCj · (...(C2 · C1 )...), v, Cj+1 , ..., Cn+1 icontj
hCn+1 · (...(C2 · C1 )...), vicontn+1
h[ ], vicontn+1
⇒ hCj+1 , v, Cj+2 , ..., Cn+1 icontj +1
⇒ hC1 , v, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
⇒ hC1 , v, C2 , ..., Cn+1 icont1
⇒ v
Figure 14: A substitution-based abstract machine for the the CPS hierarchy at level n, ctd.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 25
• Initial transition, transition rules, and final transition (1 ≤ i ≤ n, 2 ≤ j ≤ n):
26
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
1 ≤ i ≤ n; they define the actual redexes:
(δ)
Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [succ pmq] →n Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [pm + 1q]
(βλ )
Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [(λx .t) v] →n Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [t{v/x }]
(Sλi )
Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [Si k .t] →n
Cn+1 #n · · · #i+1 Ci+1 #i [ ] . . . #1 [t{Ci · (. . . (C2 · C1 ) . . .)/k }]
i )
(βctx
Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [Ci′ · (. . . (C2′ · C1′ ) . . .) v] →n
Cn+1 #n · · · #i+1 Ci+1 · (. . . (C2 · C1 ) . . .) #i Ci′ #i−1 · · · #1 C1′ [v]
(Reseti )
Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [hhviii ] →n Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [v]
Each level contains all the reductions from lower levels, and these reductions are compatible with additional layers of evaluation contexts. In particular, at level 0 there are only
δ- and βλ -reductions.
The values and evaluation contexts are already specified in the abstract machine. Moreover, the potential redexes are defined according to the following grammar:
pn ::= succ v | v0 v1 | Si k .t | h viii
(1 ≤ i ≤ n)
Lemma 2 (Unique decomposition for level n). A program t is either a value or there
exists a unique sequence of contexts C1 , . . . , Cn+1 and a potential redex pn such that
t = plug (Cn+1 #n · · · #1 C1 [pn ]).
Evaluating a term using either the derived reduction rules or the substitution-based
abstract machine from Section 5.3 yields the same result:
Theorem 6. For any program t and any value v, evalsn (t) = v if and only if t →∗n v, where
→∗n is the reflexive, transitive closure of →n .
As in Section 4.4, using refocusing, one can go from a given reduction semantics of
Section 5.4 into a pre-abstract machine and the corresponding eval/apply abstract machine
of Figures 13 and 14.
5.5. Beyond CPS. As in Section 4.5, one can define a family of concatenation functions
over contexts and use it to implement composable continuations in the CPS hierarchy,
giving rise to a family of control operators Fn and #n . Again the modified environmentbased abstract machine does not immediately correspond to a defunctionalized continuationpassing evaluator. Such control operators go beyond traditional CPS.
5.6. Static vs. dynamic delimited continuations. As in Section 4.6, one can illustrate
the difference between static and dynamic delimited continuations in the CPS hierarchy.
For example, replacing shift2 and reset2 respectively by F2 and #2 in Danvy and Filinski’s
version of Abelson and Sussman’s generator of triples [28, Section 3] yields a list in reverse
order.4
5.7. Summary and conclusion. We have generalized the results presented in Section 4
from level 1 to the whole CPS hierarchy of control operators shiftn and resetn . Starting
from the original evaluator for the λ-calculus with shiftn and resetn that uses n + 1 layers
of continuations, we have derived two abstract machines, an environment-based one and
a substitution-based one; each of these machines use n + 1 layers of evaluation contexts.
4Thanks are due to an anonymous reviewer for pointing this out.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 27
Based on the substitution-based machine we have obtained a reduction semantics for the
λ-calculus extended with shiftn and resetn which, by construction, is sound with respect to
CPS.
6. Programming in the CPS hierarchy
To finish, we present new examples of programming in the CPS hierarchy. The examples
are normalization functions. In Sections 6.1 and 6.2, we first describe normalization by
evaluation and we present the simple example of the free monoid. In Section 6.3, we present a
function mapping a proposition into its disjunctive normal form; this normalization function
uses delimited continuations. In Section 6.4, we generalize the normalization functions of
Sections 6.2 and 6.3 to a hierarchical language of units and products, and we express the
corresponding normalization function in the CPS hierarchy.
6.1. Normalization by evaluation. Normalization by evaluation is a ‘reduction-free’ approach to normalizing terms. Instead of reducing a term to its normal form, one evaluates
this term into a non-standard model and reifies its denotation into its normal form [34]:
eval
reify
normalize
normalize
:
:
:
=
term → value
value → term nf
term → term nf
reify ◦ eval
Normalization by evaluation has been developed in intuitionistic type theory [20, 63],
proof theory [12,13], category theory [4], and partial evaluation [22,23], where it has emerged
as a new field of application for delimited continuations [9, 23, 34, 44, 48, 51, 78].
6.2. The free monoid. A source term in the free monoid is either a variable, the unit
element, or the product of two terms:
term ∋ t ::= x | ε | t ⋆ t′
The product is associative and the unit element is neutral. These properties justify the
following conversion rules:
t ⋆ (t′ ⋆ t′′ ) ↔ (t ⋆ t′ ) ⋆ t′′
t⋆ε ↔ t
ε⋆t ↔ t
We aim (for example) for list-like flat normal forms:
t
term nf ∋ b
t ::= εnf | x ⋆nf b
In a reduction-based approach to normalization, one would orient the conversion rules
into reduction rules and one would apply these reduction rules until a normal form is
obtained:
t ⋆ (t′ ⋆ t′′ ) ← (t ⋆ t′ ) ⋆ t′′
ε⋆t → t
In a reduction-free approach to normalization, one defines a normalization function as
the composition of a non-standard evaluation function and a reification function. Let us
state such a normalization function.
28
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
The non-standard domain of values is the transformer
value = term nf → term nf .
The evaluation function is defined by induction over the syntax of source terms, and
the reification function inverts it:
eval x = λt.x ⋆nf t
eval ε = λt.t
eval (t ⋆ t′ ) = (eval t) ◦ (eval t′ )
reify v = v εnf
normalize t = reify (eval t)
In effect, eval is a homomorphism from the source monoid to the monoid of transformers (unit is mapped to unit and products are mapped to products) and the normalization
function hinges on the built-in associativity of function composition. Beylin, Dybjer, Coquand, and Kinoshita have studied its theoretical content [14, 20, 58]. From a (functional)
programming standpoint, the reduction-based approach amounts to flattening a tree iteratively by reordering it, and the reduction-free approach amounts to flattening a tree with
an accumulator.
6.3. A language of propositions. A source term, i.e., a proposition, is either a variable,
a literal (true or false), a conjunction, or a disjunction:
term ∋ t ::= x | true | t ∧ t′ | false | t ∨ t′
Conjunction and disjunction are associative and distribute over each other; true is neutral
for conjunction and absorbant for disjunction; and false is neutral for disjunction and
absorbant for conjunction.
We aim (for example) for list-like disjunctive normal forms:
term nf ∋ b
t ::= d
nf
term d ∋ d ::= false nf | c ∨nf d
nf | x ∧nf c
term nf
c ∋ c ::= true
Our normalization function is the result of composing a non-standard evaluation function
and a reification function. We state them below without proof.
Given the domains of transformers
nf
F1 = term nf
c → term c
nf
nf
F2 = term d → term d
the non-standard domain of values is ans 1 , where
ans 2 = F2
ans 1 = (F1 → ans 2 ) → ans 2 .
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 29
The evaluation function is defined by induction over the syntax of source terms, and the
reification function inverts it:
eval 0 x k d
eval 0 true k d
eval 0 (t ∧ t′ ) k d
eval 0 false k d
eval 0 (t ∨ t′ ) k d
=
=
=
=
=
k (λc.x ∧nf c) d
k (λc.c) d
eval 0 t (λf1 .eval 0 t′ (λf1′ .k (f1 ◦ f1′ ))) d
d
eval 0 t k (eval 0 t′ k d)
reify 0 v = v (λf1 .λd.(f1 true nf ) ∨nf d) false nf
normalize t = reify 0 (eval 0 t)
This normalization function uses a continuation k, an accumulator d to flatten disjunctions,
and another one c to flatten conjunctions. The continuation is delimited: the three first
clauses of eval 0 are in CPS; in the fourth, k is discarded (accounting for the fact that false
is absorbant for conjunction); and in the last, k is duplicated and used in non-tail position
(achieving the distribution of conjunctions over disjunctions). The continuation and the
accumulators are initialized in the definition of reify 0 .
Uncurrying the continuation and mapping eval 0 and reify 0 back to direct style yield
the following definition, which lives at level 1 of the CPS hierarchy:
eval 1 x d = (λc.x ∧nf c, d)
eval 1 true d = (λc.c, d)
eval 1 (t ∧ t′ ) d = let (f1 , d) = eval 1 t d
in let (f1′ , d) = eval 1 t′ d
in (f1 ◦ f1′ , d)
eval 1 false d = Sk.d
eval 1 (t ∨ t′ ) d = Sk.k (eval 1 t h k (eval 1 t′ d)ii)
reify 1 v = h let (f1 , d) = v false nf
in (f1 true nf ) ∨nf dii
normalize t = reify 1 (eval 1 t)
The three first clauses of eval 1 are in direct style; the two others abstract control with
shift. In the fourth clause, the context is discarded; and in the last clause, the context is
duplicated and composed. The context and the accumulators are initialized in the definition
of reify 1 .
This direct-style version makes it even more clear than the CPS version that the accumulator for the disjunctions in normal form is a threaded state. A continuation-based,
state-based version (or better, a monad-based one) can therefore be written—but it is out
of scope here.
6.4. A hierarchical language of units and products. We consider a generalization of
propositional logic where a source term is either a variable, a unit in a hierarchy of units,
or a product in a hierarchy of products:
term ∋ t ::= x | εi | t ⋆i t′
where 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
All the products are associative. All units are neutral for products with the same index.
30
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
The free monoid: The language corresponds to that of the free monoid if n = 1, as
in Section 6.2.
Boolean logic: The language corresponds to that of propositions if n = 2, as in
Section 6.3: ε1 is true, ⋆1 is ∧, ε2 is false, and ⋆2 is ∨.
Multi-valued logic: In general, for each n > 2 we can consider a suitable n-valued
logic [47]; for example, in case n = 4, the language corresponds to that of Belnap’s
bilattice FOU R [11]. It is also possible to modify the normalization function to
work for less regular logical structures (e.g., other bilattices).
Monads: In general, the language corresponds to that of layered monads [64]: each
unit element is the unit of the corresponding monad, and each product is the ‘bind’
of the corresponding monad. In practice, layered monads are collapsed into one for
programming consumption [43], but prior to this collapse, all the individual monad
operations coexist in the computational soup.
In the remainder of this section, we assume that all the products, besides being associative, distribute over each other, and that all units, besides being neutral for products
with the same index, are absorbant for products with other indices. We aim (for example)
for a generalization of disjunctive normal forms:
term nf ∋ b
t ::= tn
nf
nf
term nf
∋
t
n ::= εn | tn−1 ⋆n tn
n
..
.
nf
nf
term nf
1 ∋ t1 ::= ε1 | t0 ⋆1 t1
term nf
0 ∋ t0 ::= x
For presentational reasons, in the remainder of this section we arbitrarily fix n to be 5.
Our normalization function is the result of composing a non-standard evaluation function and a reification function. We state them below without proof. Given the domains of
transformers
nf
F1 = term nf
1 → term 1
nf
F2 = term nf
2 → term 2
nf
nf
F3 = term 3 → term 3
nf
F4 = term nf
4 → term 4
nf
F5 = term nf
5 → term 5
the non-standard domain of values is ans 1 , where
ans 5
ans 4
ans 3
ans 2
ans 1
=
=
=
=
=
F5
(F4
(F3
(F2
(F1
→
→
→
→
ans 5 )
ans 4 )
ans 3 )
ans 2 )
→
→
→
→
ans 5
ans 4
ans 3
ans 2 .
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 31
The evaluation function is defined by induction over the syntax of source terms, and the
reification function inverts it:
eval 0 x k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 ε1 k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 (t ⋆1 t′ ) k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 ε2 k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 (t ⋆2 t′ ) k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 ε3 k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 (t ⋆3 t′ ) k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 ε4 k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 (t ⋆4 t′ ) k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 ε5 k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 (t ⋆5 t′ ) k1 k2 k3 k4 t5
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
k1 (λt1 .x ⋆nf
1 t1 ) k2 k3 k4 t5
k1 (λt1 .t1 ) k2 k3 k4 t5
eval 0 t (λf1 .eval 0 t′ (λf1′ .k1 (f1 ◦ f1′ ))) k2 k3 k4 t5
k2 (λt2 .t2 ) k3 k4 t5
eval 0 t k1 (λf2 .eval 0 t′ k1 (λf2′ .k2 (f2 ◦ f2′ ))) k3 k4 t5
k3 (λt3 .t3 ) k4 t5
eval 0 t k1 k2 (λf3 .eval 0 t′ k1 k2 (λf3′ .k3 (f3 ◦ f3′ ))) k4 t5
k4 (λt4 .t4 ) t5
eval 0 t k1 k2 k3 (λf4 .eval 0 t′ k1 k2 k3 (λf4′ .k4 (f4 ◦ f4′ ))) t5
t5
eval 0 t k1 k2 k3 k4 (eval 0 t′ k1 k2 k3 k4 t5 )
nf
reify 0 v = v (λf1 .λk2 .k2 (λt2 .(f1 εnf
1 ) ⋆2 t2 ))
nf
(λf2 .λk3 .k3 (λt3 .(f2 εnf
2 ) ⋆3 t3 ))
nf
nf
(λf3 .λk4 .k4 (λt4 .(f3 ε3 ) ⋆4 t4 ))
nf
(λf4 .λt5 .(f4 εnf
4 ) ⋆5 t5 )
ε5
normalize t = reify 0 (eval 0 t)
This normalization function uses four delimited continuations k1 , k2 , k3 , k4 and five accumulators t1 , t2 , t3 , t4 , t5 to flatten each of the successive products. In the clause of each εi ,
the continuations k1 , . . . , ki−1 are discarded, accounting for the fact that εi is absorbant for
⋆1 , . . . , ⋆i−1 , and the identity function is passed to ki , accounting for the fact that εi is neutral for ⋆i . In the clause of each ⋆i+1 , the continuations k1 , . . . , ki are duplicated and used
in non-tail position, achieving the distribution of ⋆i+1 over ⋆1 , . . . , ⋆i . The continuations
and the accumulators are initialized in the definition of reify 0 .
This normalization function lives at level 0 of the CPS hierarchy, but we can express
it at a higher level using shift and reset. For example, uncurrying k3 and k4 and mapping
eval 0 and reify 0 back to direct style twice yield the following intermediate definition, which
lives at level 2:
eval 2 x k1 k2 t5 = k1 (λt1 .x ⋆nf
1 t1 ) k2 t5
eval 2 ε1 k1 k2 t5 = k1 (λt1 .t1 ) k2 t5
eval 2 (t ⋆1 t′ ) k1 k2 t5 = eval 2 t (λf1 .eval 2 t′ (λf1′ .k1 (f1 ◦ f1′ ))) k2 t5
eval 2 ε2 k1 k2 t5 = k2 (λt2 .t2 ) t5
eval 2 (t ⋆2 t′ ) k1 k2 t5 = eval 2 t k1 (λf2 .eval 2 t′ k1 (λf2′ .k2 (f2 ◦ f2′ ))) t5
eval 2 ε3 k1 k2 t5 = (λt3 .t3 , t5 )
eval 2 (t ⋆3 t′ ) k1 k2 t5 = let (f3 , t5 ) = eval 2 t k1 k2 t5
in let (f3′ , t5 ) = eval 2 t′ k1 k2 t5
in (f3 ◦ f3′ , t5 )
32
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
eval 2 ε4 k1 k2 t5 = S1 k3 .(λt4 .t4 , t5 )
eval 2 (t ⋆4 t′ ) k1 k2 t5 = S1 k3 .let (f4 , t5 ) = h k3 (eval 2 t k1 k2 t5 )ii1
in let (f4′ , t5 ) = h k3 (eval 2 t′ k1 k2 t5 )ii1
in (f4 ◦ f4′ , t5 )
eval 2 ε5 k1 k2 t5 = S2 k4 .t5
eval 2 (t ⋆5 t′ ) k1 k2 t5 = S1 k3 .S2 k4 .let t5 = h k4 h k3 (eval 2 t′ k1 k2 t5 )ii1 i 2
in h k4 h k3 (eval 2 t k1 k2 t5 )ii1 i 2
nf
reify 2 v = h let (f4 , t5 ) = h let (f3 , t5 ) = v (λf1 .λk2 .k2 (λt2 .(f1 εnf
1 ) ⋆2 t2 ))
nf
nf
(λf2 .λt3 .(f2 ε2 ) ⋆3 t3 )
ε5
nf
i1
in (λf4 .(f3 ε3 ) ⋆nf
4 t4 , t5 )i
nf
nf
in (f4 ε4 ) ⋆5 t5 i 2
normalize t = reify 2 (eval 2 t)
Whereas eval 0 had four layered continuations, eval 2 has only two layered continuations
since it has been mapped back to direct style twice. Where eval 0 accesses k3 as one of its
parameters, eval 2 abstracts the first layer of control with shift1 , and where eval 0 accesses
k4 as one of its parameters, eval 2 abstracts the first and the second layer of control with
shift2 .
Uncurrying k1 and k2 and mapping eval 2 and reify 2 back to direct style twice yield the
following direct-style definition, which lives at level 4 of the CPS hierarchy:
eval 4 x t5 = (λt1 .x ⋆nf
1 t1 , t5 )
eval 4 ε1 t5 = (λt1 .t1 , t5 )
eval 4 (t ⋆1 t′ ) t5 = let (f1 , t5 ) = eval 4 t t5
in let (f1′ , t5 ) = eval 4 t′ t5
in (f1 ◦ f1′ , t5 )
eval 4 ε2 t5 = S1 k1 .(λt2 .t2 , t5 )
eval 4 (t ⋆2 t′ ) t5 = S1 k1 .let (f2 , t5 ) = h k1 (eval 4 t t5 )ii1
in let (f2′ , t5 ) = h k1 (eval 4 t′ t5 )ii1
in (f2 ◦ f2′ , t5 )
eval 4 ε3 t5 = S2 k2 .(λt3 .t3 , t5 )
eval 4 (t ⋆3 t′ ) t5 = S1 k1 .S2 k2 .let (f3 , t5 ) = h k2 h k1 (eval 4 t t5 )ii1 i 2
in let (f3′ , t5 ) = h k2 h k1 (eval 4 t′ t5 )ii1 i 2
in (f3 ◦ f3′ , t5 )
eval 4 ε4 t5 = S3 k3 .(λt4 .t4 , t5 )
eval 4 (t ⋆4 t′ ) t5 = S1 k1 .S2 k2 .S3 k3 .let (f4 , t5 ) = h k3 h k2 h k1 (eval 4 t t5 )ii1 i 2 i 3
in let (f4′ , t5 ) = h k3 h k2 h k1 (eval 4 t′ t5 )ii1 i 2 i 3
in (f4 ◦ f4′ , t5 )
eval 4 ε5 t5 = S4 k4 .t5
eval 4 (t ⋆5 t′ ) t5 = S1 k1 .S2 k2 .S3 k3 .S4 k4 .let t5 = h k4 h k3 h k2 h k1 (eval 4 t′ t5 )ii1 i 2 i 3 i 4
in h k4 h k3 h k2 h k1 (eval 4 t t5 )ii1 i 2 i 3 i 4
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 33
reify 4 v = h let (f4 , t5 ) = h let (f3 , t5 ) = h let (f2 , t5 ) = h let (f1 , t5 ) = v ε5
nf
i1
in (λf2 .(f1 εnf
1 ) ⋆2 t2 , t5 )i
nf
nf
in (λf3 .(f2 ε2 ) ⋆3 t3 , t5 )ii2
nf
in (λf4 .(f3 εnf
)
i3
3 ⋆4 t4 , t5 )i
nf
nf
in (f4 ε4 ) ⋆5 t5 i 4
normalize t = reify 4 (eval 4 t)
Whereas eval 2 had two layered continuations, eval 4 has none since it has been mapped back
to direct style twice. Where eval 2 accesses k1 as one of its parameters, eval 4 abstracts the
first layer of control with shift1 , and where eval 2 accesses k2 as one of its parameters, eval 4
abstracts the first and the second layer of control with shift2 . Where eval 2 uses reset1 and
shift1 , eval 4 uses reset3 and shift3 , and where eval 2 uses reset2 and shift2 , eval 4 uses reset4
and shift4 .
6.5. A note about efficiency. We have implemented all the definitions of Section 6.4 as
well as the intermediate versions eval 1 and eval 3 in ML [32]. We have also implemented
hierarchical normalization functions for other values than 5.
For high products (i.e., in Section 6.4, for source terms using ⋆3 and ⋆4 ), the normalization function living at level 0 of the CPS hierarchy is the most efficient one. On the
other hand, for low products (i.e., in Section 6.4, for source terms using ⋆1 and ⋆2 ), the
normalization functions living at a higher level of the CPS hierarchy are the most efficient
ones. These relative efficiencies are explained in terms of resources:
• Accessing to a continuation as an explicit parameter is more efficient than accessing
to it through a control operator.
• On the other hand, the restriction of eval 4 to source terms that only use ε1 and ⋆1
is in direct style, whereas the corresponding restrictions of eval 2 and eval 0 pass a
number of extra parameters. These extra parameters penalize performance.
The better performance of programs in the CPS hierarchy has already been reported for
level 1 in the context of continuation-based partial evaluation [61], and it has been reported
for a similar “pay as you go” reason: a program that abstracts control relatively rarely is run
more efficiently in direct style with a control operator rather than in continuation-passing
style.
6.6. Summary and conclusion. We have illustrated the CPS hierarchy with an application of normalization by evaluation that naturally involves successive layers of continuations
and that demonstrates the expressive power of shiftn and resetn .
The application also suggests alternative control operators that would fit better its
continuation-based programming pattern. For example, instead of representing a delimited
continuation as a function and apply it as such, we could represent it as a continuation and
apply it with a ‘throw’ operator as in MacLisp and Standard ML of New Jersey. For another
example, instead of throwing a value to a continuation, we could specify the continuation of
a computation, e.g., with a reflect i special form. For a third example, instead of abstracting
control up to a layer n, we could give access to each of the successive layers up to n, e.g.,
with a Ln operator. Then instead of
eval 4 (t ⋆4 t′ ) t5 = S1 k1 .S2 k2 .S3 k3 .let (f4 , t5 ) = h k3 h k2 h k1 (eval 4 t t5 )ii1 i 2 i 3
in let (f4′ , t5 ) = h k3 h k2 h k1 (eval 4 t′ t5 )ii1 i 2 i 3
in (f4 ◦ f4′ , t5 )
34
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
one could write
eval 4 (t ⋆4 t′ ) t5 = L3 (k1 , k2 , k3 ).let (f4′ , t5 ) = reflect 3 (eval 4 t t5 , k1 , k2 , k3 )
in let (f4′ , t5 ) = reflect 3 (eval 4 t′ t5 , k1 , k2 , k3 )
in (f4 ◦ f4′ , t5 ).
Such alternative control operators can be more convenient to use, while being compatible
with CPS.
7. Conclusion and issues
We have used CPS as a guideline to establish an operational foundation for delimited
continuations. Starting from a call-by-value evaluator for λ-terms with shift and reset,
we have mechanically derived the corresponding abstract machine. From this abstract
machine, it is straightforward to obtain a reduction semantics of delimited control that,
by construction, is compatible with CPS—both for one-step reduction and for evaluation.
These results can also be established without the guideline of CPS, but less easily.
The whole approach generalizes straightforwardly to account for the shiftn and resetn
family of delimited-control operators and more generally for any control operators that are
compatible with CPS. These results would be non-trivial to establish without the guideline
of CPS.
Defunctionalization provides a key for connecting continuation-passing style and operational intuitions about control. Indeed most of the time, control stacks and evaluation
contexts are the defunctionalized continuations of an evaluator. Defunctionalization also
provides a key for identifying where operational intuitions about control go beyond CPS
(see Section 4.5).
We do not know whether CPS is the ultimate answer, but the present work shows yet
another example of its usefulness. It is like nothing can go wrong with CPS.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Mads Sig Ager, Julia Lawall, Jan Midtgaard, and the referees of
CW’04 and of LMCS for their comments. The third author would also like to thank Samuel
Lindley for our joint initial study of the normalization functions of Section 6.
This work is partially supported by the ESPRIT Working Group APPSEM II
(http://www.appsem.org), by the Danish Natural Science Research Council, Grant no. 2102-0474 (for the two first authors) and Grant no. 21-03-0545 (for the third author), and by
BRICS (Basic Research in Computer Science (http://www.brics.dk), funded by the Danish
National Research Foundation).
References
[1] Mads Sig Ager, Dariusz Biernacki, Olivier Danvy, and Jan Midtgaard. A functional correspondence between evaluators and abstract machines. In Dale Miller, editor, Proceedings of the Fifth ACM-SIGPLAN
International Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming (PPDP’03), pages 8–
19. ACM Press, August 2003.
[2] Mads Sig Ager, Olivier Danvy, and Jan Midtgaard. A functional correspondence between call-by-need
evaluators and lazy abstract machines. Information Processing Letters, 90(5):223–232, 2004. Extended
version available as the technical report BRICS-RS-04-3.
[3] Mads Sig Ager, Olivier Danvy, and Jan Midtgaard. A functional correspondence between monadic evaluators and abstract machines for languages with computational effects. Theoretical Computer Science,
342(1):149–172, 2005. Extended version available as the technical report BRICS RS-04-28.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 35
[4] Thorsten Altenkirch, Martin Hofmann, and Thomas Streicher. Categorical reconstruction of a reductionfree normalization proof. In David H. Pitt, David E. Rydeheard, and Peter Johnstone, editors, Category
Theory and Computer Science, number 953 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 182–199,
Cambridge, UK, August 1995. Springer-Verlag.
[5] Zena M. Ariola, Hugo Herbelin, and Amr Sabry. A type-theoretic foundation of continuations and
prompts. In Fisher [45], pages 40–53.
[6] Kenichi Asai. Online partial evaluation for shift and reset. In Peter Thiemann, editor, Proceedings of
the 2002 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Semantics-Based Program Manipulation
(PEPM 2002), SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 37, No 3, pages 19–30, Portland, Oregon, March 2002. ACM
Press.
[7] Kenichi Asai. Offline partial evaluation for shift and reset. In Nevin Heintze and Peter Sestoft, editors, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Partial Evaluation and Semantics-Based
Program Manipulation (PEPM 2004), pages 3–14, Verona, Italy, August 2003. ACM Press.
[8] Vincent Balat, Roberto Di Cosmo, and Marcelo P. Fiore. Extensional normalisation and type-directed
partial evaluation for typed lambda calculus with sums. In Xavier Leroy, editor, Proceedings of the
Thirty-First Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 64–76, Venice,
Italy, January 2004. ACM Press.
[9] Vincent Balat and Olivier Danvy. Memoization in type-directed partial evaluation. In Don Batory,
Charles Consel, and Walid Taha, editors, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGPLAN/SIGSOFT Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering, number 2487 in Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, pages 78–92, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, October 2002. Springer-Verlag.
[10] Anindya Banerjee, Nevin Heintze, and Jon G. Riecke. Design and correctness of program transformations based on control-flow analysis. In Naoki Kobayashi and Benjamin C. Pierce, editors, Theoretical
Aspects of Computer Software, 4th International Symposium, TACS 2001, number 2215 in Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 420–447, Sendai, Japan, October 2001. Springer-Verlag.
[11] Nuel D. Belnap. How a computer should think. In Gilbert Ryle, editor, Proceedings of the Oxford
International Symposium on Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, pages 30–56, Oxford, England, 1976.
Oriel Press.
[12] Ulrich Berger, Matthias Eberl, and Helmut Schwichtenberg. Normalization by evaluation. In Bernhard
Möller and John V. Tucker, editors, Prospects for hardware foundations (NADA), number 1546 in
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 117–137, Berlin, Germany, 1998. Springer-Verlag.
[13] Ulrich Berger and Helmut Schwichtenberg. An inverse of the evaluation functional for typed λ-calculus.
In Gilles Kahn, editor, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science,
pages 203–211, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press.
[14] Ilya Beylin and Peter Dybjer. Extracting a proof of coherence for monoidal categories from a proof
of normalization for monoids. In Stefano Berardi and Mario Coppo, editors, Types for Proofs and
Programs, International Workshop TYPES’95, number 1158 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
pages 47–61, Torino, Italy, June 1995. Springer-Verlag.
[15] Malgorzata Biernacka and Olivier Danvy. A concrete framework for environment machines. Research
Report BRICS RS-05-15, DAIMI, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus,
Denmark, May 2005.
[16] Malgorzata Biernacka and Olivier Danvy. A syntactic correspondence between context-sensitive calculi
and abstract machines. Research Report BRICS RS-05-22, DAIMI, Department of Computer Science,
University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, July 2005.
[17] Dariusz Biernacki and Olivier Danvy. From interpreter to logic engine by defunctionalization. In Maurice Bruynooghe, editor, Logic Based Program Synthesis and Transformation, 13th International Symposium, LOPSTR 2003, number 3018 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 143–159, Uppsala,
Sweden, August 2003. Springer-Verlag.
[18] Dariusz Biernacki, Olivier Danvy, and Kevin Millikin. A dynamic continuation-passing style for dynamic
delimited continuations. Research Report BRICS RS-05-16, DAIMI, Department of Computer Science,
University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, May 2005.
[19] Dariusz Biernacki, Olivier Danvy, and Chung-chieh Shan. On the dynamic extent of delimited continuations. Information Processing Letters, 96(1):7–17, 2005. Extended version available as the technical
report BRICS RS-05-13.
36
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
[20] Thierry Coquand and Peter Dybjer. Intuitionistic model constructions and normalization proofs. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 7:75–94, 1997.
[21] Olivier Danvy. On listing list prefixes. LISP Pointers, 2(3-4):42–46, January 1989. ACM Press.
[22] Olivier Danvy. Type-directed partial evaluation. In Guy L. Steele Jr., editor, Proceedings of the TwentyThird Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 242–257, St. Petersburg
Beach, Florida, January 1996. ACM Press.
[23] Olivier Danvy. Type-directed partial evaluation. In John Hatcliff, Torben Æ. Mogensen, and Peter
Thiemann, editors, Partial Evaluation – Practice and Theory; Proceedings of the 1998 DIKU Summer
School, number 1706 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 367–411, Copenhagen, Denmark,
July 1998. Springer-Verlag.
[24] Olivier Danvy. From reduction-based to reduction-free normalization. In Sergio Antoy and Yoshihito
Toyama, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Reduction Strategies in Rewriting
and Programming (WRS’04), number 124 in Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, pages
79–100, Aachen, Germany, May 2004. Elsevier Science. Invited talk.
[25] Olivier Danvy. On evaluation contexts, continuations, and the rest of the computation. In Hayo Thielecke, editor, Proceedings of the Fourth ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Continuations, Technical report
CSR-04-1, Department of Computer Science, Queen Mary’s College, pages 13–23, Venice, Italy, January
2004. Invited talk.
[26] Olivier Danvy. A rational deconstruction of Landin’s SECD machine. In Clemens Grelck, Frank Huch,
Greg J. Michaelson, and Phil Trinder, editors, Implementation and Application of Functional Languages,
16th International Workshop, IFL’04, number 3474 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 52–71,
Lübeck, Germany, September 2004. Springer-Verlag. Recipient of the 2004 Peter Landin prize. Extended
version available as the technical report BRICS-RS-03-33.
[27] Olivier Danvy and Andrzej Filinski. A functional abstraction of typed contexts. DIKU Rapport 89/12,
DIKU, Computer Science Department, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 1989.
[28] Olivier Danvy and Andrzej Filinski. Abstracting control. In Wand [81], pages 151–160.
[29] Olivier Danvy and Andrzej Filinski. Representing control, a study of the CPS transformation. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 2(4):361–391, 1992.
[30] Olivier Danvy and Lasse R. Nielsen. Defunctionalization at work. In Harald Søndergaard, editor, Proceedings of the Third International ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming (PPDP’01), pages 162–174, Firenze, Italy, September 2001. ACM Press. Extended
version available as the technical report BRICS RS-01-23.
[31] Olivier Danvy and Lasse R. Nielsen. Refocusing in reduction semantics. Research Report BRICS RS-0426, DAIMI, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, November 2004.
A preliminary version appears in the informal proceedings of the Second International Workshop on
Rule-Based Programming (RULE 2001), Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 59.4.
[32] Olivier Danvy and Zhe Yang. An operational investigation of the CPS hierarchy. In S. Doaitse Swierstra,
editor, Proceedings of the Eighth European Symposium on Programming, number 1576 in Lecture Notes
in Computer Science, pages 224–242, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 1999. Springer-Verlag.
[33] Scott Draves. Implementing bit-addressing with specialization. In Mads Tofte, editor, Proceedings of
the 1997 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pages 239–250, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 1997. ACM Press.
[34] Peter Dybjer and Andrzej Filinski. Normalization and partial evaluation. In Gilles Barthe, Peter Dybjer,
Luı́s Pinto, and João Saraiva, editors, Applied Semantics – Advanced Lectures, number 2395 in Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 137–192, Caminha, Portugal, September 2000. Springer-Verlag.
[35] R. Kent Dybvig, Simon Peyton-Jones, and Amr Sabry. A monadic framework for subcontinuations.
Technical Report 615, Computer Science Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, June
2005.
[36] Matthias Felleisen. The Calculi of λ-v-CS Conversion: A Syntactic Theory of Control and State in
Imperative Higher-Order Programming Languages. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Indiana
University, Bloomington, Indiana, August 1987.
[37] Matthias Felleisen. The theory and practice of first-class prompts. In Jeanne Ferrante and Peter Mager,
editors, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages,
pages 180–190, San Diego, California, January 1988. ACM Press.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 37
[38] Matthias Felleisen and Matthew Flatt. Programming languages and lambda calculi. Unpublished lecture
notes. http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/3810-w02/readings.html, 1989-2003.
[39] Matthias Felleisen and Daniel P. Friedman. Control operators, the SECD machine, and the λ-calculus.
In Martin Wirsing, editor, Formal Description of Programming Concepts III, pages 193–217. Elsevier
Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1986.
[40] Matthias Felleisen, Daniel P. Friedman, Bruce Duba, and John Merrill. Beyond continuations. Technical
Report 216, Computer Science Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, February 1987.
[41] Matthias Felleisen, Mitchell Wand, Daniel P. Friedman, and Bruce F. Duba. Abstract continuations:
A mathematical semantics for handling full functional jumps. In Robert (Corky) Cartwright, editor,
Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming, pages 52–62, Snowbird,
Utah, July 1988. ACM Press.
[42] Andrzej Filinski. Representing monads. In Hans-J. Boehm, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-First
Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 446–457, Portland, Oregon,
January 1994. ACM Press.
[43] Andrzej Filinski. Representing layered monads. In Alex Aiken, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth
Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 175–188, San Antonio, Texas,
January 1999. ACM Press.
[44] Andrzej Filinski. Normalization by evaluation for the computational lambda-calculus. In Samson
Abramsky, editor, Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, 5th International Conference, TLCA 2001,
number 2044 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 151–165, Kraków, Poland, May 2001.
Springer-Verlag.
[45] Kathleen Fisher, editor. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, Snowbird, Utah, September 2004. ACM Press.
[46] Martin Gasbichler and Michael Sperber. Final shift for call/cc: direct implementation of shift and reset.
In Simon Peyton Jones, editor, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on
Functional Programming, SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 37, No. 9, pages 271–282, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
September 2002. ACM Press.
[47] Matthew L. Ginsberg. Multivalued logics: a uniform approach to reasoning in artificial intelligence.
Computational Intelligence, 4:265–316, 1988.
[48] Bernd Grobauer and Zhe Yang. The second Futamura projection for type-directed partial evaluation.
Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 14(2/3):173–219, 2001.
[49] Carl Gunter, Didier Rémy, and Jon G. Riecke. A generalization of exceptions and control in ML-like
languages. In Simon Peyton Jones, editor, Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Functional
Programming and Computer Architecture, pages 12–23, La Jolla, California, June 1995. ACM Press.
[50] Thérèse Hardin, Luc Maranget, and Bruno Pagano. Functional runtime systems within the lambdasigma calculus. Journal of Functional Programming, 8(2):131–172, 1998.
[51] Simon Helsen and Peter Thiemann. Two flavors of offline partial evaluation. In Jieh Hsiang and Atsushi
Ohori, editors, Advances in Computing Science - ASIAN’98, number 1538 in Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, pages 188–205, Manila, The Philippines, December 1998. Springer-Verlag.
[52] Robert Hieb and R. Kent Dybvig. Continuations and concurrency. In Proceedings of the Second ACM
SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles & Practice of Parallel Programming, SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 25,
No. 3, pages 128–136, Seattle, Washington, March 1990. ACM Press.
[53] Robert Hieb, R. Kent Dybvig, and Claude W. Anderson, III. Subcontinuations. Lisp and Symbolic
Computation, 5(4):295–326, December 1993.
[54] John Hughes. A novel representation of lists and its application to the function “reverse”. Information
Processing Letters, 22(3):141–144, 1986.
[55] Yukiyoshi Kameyama. Axioms for delimited continuations in the CPS hierarchy. In Jerzy Marcinkowski
and Andrzej Tarlecki, editors, Computer Science Logic, 18th International Workshop, CSL 2004, 13th
Annual Conference of the EACSL, Proceedings, volume 3210 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
pages 442–457, Karpacz, Poland, September 2004. Springer.
[56] Yukiyoshi Kameyama and Masahito Hasegawa. A sound and complete axiomatization of delimited
continuations. In Olin Shivers, editor, Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference
on Functional Programming, pages 177–188, Uppsala, Sweden, August 2003. ACM Press.
[57] Richard Kelsey, William Clinger, and Jonathan Rees, editors. Revised5 report on the algorithmic language Scheme. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 11(1):7–105, 1998.
38
M. BIERNACKA, D. BIERNACKI, AND O. DANVY
[58] Yoshiki Kinoshita. A bicategorical analysis of E-categories. Mathematica Japonica, 47(1):157–169, 1998.
[59] Oleg Kiselyov. How to remove a dynamic prompt: Static and dynamic delimited continuation operators are equally expressible. Technical Report 611, Computer Science Department, Indiana University,
Bloomington, Indiana, March 2005.
[60] Peter J. Landin. The mechanical evaluation of expressions. The Computer Journal, 6(4):308–320, 1964.
[61] Julia L. Lawall and Olivier Danvy. Continuation-based partial evaluation. In Carolyn L. Talcott, editor,
Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming, LISP Pointers, Vol. VII,
No. 3, pages 227–238, Orlando, Florida, June 1994. ACM Press.
[62] Simon Marlow and Simon L. Peyton Jones. Making a fast curry: push/enter vs. eval/apply for higherorder languages. In Fisher [45], pages 4–15.
[63] Per Martin-Löf. About models for intuitionistic type theories and the notion of definitional equality. In
Proceedings of the Third Scandinavian Logic Symposium (1972), volume 82 of Studies in Logic and the
Foundation of Mathematics, pages 81–109. North-Holland, 1975.
[64] Eugenio Moggi. Notions of computation and monads. Information and Computation, 93:55–92, 1991.
[65] Luc Moreau and Christian Queinnec. Partial continuations as the difference of continuations, a duumvirate of control operators. In Manuel Hermenegildo and Jaan Penjam, editors, Sixth International
Symposium on Programming Language Implementation and Logic Programming, number 844 in Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 182–197, Madrid, Spain, September 1994. Springer-Verlag.
[66] Chethan R. Murthy. Control operators, hierarchies, and pseudo-classical type systems: A-translation
at work. In Olivier Danvy and Carolyn L. Talcott, editors, Proceedings of the First ACM SIGPLAN
Workshop on Continuations (CW 1992), Technical report STAN-CS-92-1426, Stanford University, pages
49–72, San Francisco, California, June 1992.
[67] Lasse R. Nielsen. A denotational investigation of defunctionalization. Research Report BRICS RS-00-47,
DAIMI, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, December 2000.
[68] Gordon D. Plotkin. Call-by-name, call-by-value and the λ-calculus. Theoretical Computer Science,
1:125–159, 1975.
[69] Gordon D. Plotkin. A structural approach to operational semantics. Technical Report FN-19, DAIMI,
Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, September 1981.
[70] Christian Queinnec and Bernard Serpette. A dynamic extent control operator for partial continuations. In Robert (Corky) Cartwright, editor, Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM Symposium on
Principles of Programming Languages, pages 174–184, Orlando, Florida, January 1991. ACM Press.
[71] John C. Reynolds. Definitional interpreters for higher-order programming languages. Higher-Order and
Symbolic Computation, 11(4):363–397, 1998. Reprinted from the proceedings of the 25th ACM National
Conference (1972), with a foreword.
[72] Chung-chieh Shan. Shift to control. In Olin Shivers and Oscar Waddell, editors, Proceedings of the
2004 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming, Technical report TR600,
Computer Science Department, Indiana University, Snowbird, Utah, September 2004.
[73] Dorai Sitaram. Models of Control and their Implications for Programming Language Design. PhD thesis,
Computer Science Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas, April 1994.
[74] Dorai Sitaram and Matthias Felleisen. Control delimiters and their hierarchies. Lisp and Symbolic
Computation, 3(1):67–99, January 1990.
[75] Dorai Sitaram and Matthias Felleisen. Reasoning with continuations II: Full abstraction for models of
control. In Wand [81], pages 161–175.
[76] Guy L. Steele Jr. Rabbit: A compiler for Scheme. Master’s thesis, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 1978. Technical report AI-TR474.
[77] Eijiro Sumii. An implementation of transparent migration on standard Scheme. In Matthias Felleisen,
editor, Proceedings of the Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming, Technical Report 00-368,
Rice University, pages 61–64, Montréal, Canada, September 2000.
[78] Eijiro Sumii and Naoki Kobayashi. A hybrid approach to online and offline partial evaluation. HigherOrder and Symbolic Computation, 14(2/3):101–142, 2001.
[79] Peter Thiemann. Combinators for program generation. Journal of Functional Programming, 9(5):483–
525, 1999.
[80] Philip Wadler. Monads and composable continuations. LISP and Symbolic Computation, 7(1):39–55,
January 1994.
AN OPERATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR DELIMITED CONTINUATIONS IN THE CPS HIERARCHY 39
[81] Mitchell Wand, editor. Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming,
Nice, France, June 1990. ACM Press.
[82] Yong Xiao, Amr Sabry, and Zena M. Ariola. From syntactic theories to interpreters: Automating proofs
of unique decomposition. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 14(4):387–409, 2001.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License. To view
a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/ or send a
letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
| 6cs.PL
|
Dense Subset Sum may be the hardest
arXiv:1508.06019v1 [cs.DS] 25 Aug 2015
Per Austrin
Petteri Kaski
Mikko Koivisto
Jesper Nederlof
Abstract
The Subset Sum problem asks whether a given set of n positive integers contains a subset of elements that sum
up to a given target t. It is an outstanding open question whether the O∗(2n/2 )-time algorithm for Subset Sum by
Horowitz and Sahni [J. ACM 1974] can be beaten in the worst-case setting by a “truly faster”, O∗(2(0.5−δ)n )-time
algorithm, with some constant δ > 0. Continuing an earlier work [STACS 2015], we study Subset Sum parameterized
by the maximum bin size β, defined as the largest number of subsets of the n input integers that yield the same
sum. For every ǫ > 0 we give a truly faster algorithm for instances with β ≤ 2(0.5−ǫ)n , as well as instances with
β ≥ 20.661n . Consequently, we also obtain a characterization in terms of the popular density parameter n/ log2 t: if
all instances of density at least 1.003 admit a truly faster algorithm, then so does every instance. This goes against
the current intuition that instances of density 1 are the hardest, and therefore is a step toward answering the open
question in the affirmative. Our results stem from novel combinations of earlier algorithms for Subset Sum and a
study of an extremal question in additive combinatorics connected to the problem of Uniquely Decodable Code Pairs
in information theory.
Author affiliations and addresses:
Per Austrin
School of Computer Science and Communication
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
[email protected]
Petteri Kaski
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT & Department of Computer Science
Aalto University, Finland
[email protected]
Mikko Koivisto
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT & Department of Computer Science
University of Helsinki, Finland
[email protected]
Jesper Nederlof
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
Technical University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands
[email protected]
1 Introduction
1
1
Introduction
The Subset Sum problem and its generalization to the Knapsack problem are two of the most famous
NP-complete problems. In the Subset Sum problem, we are given positive
P integers w1 , w2 , . . . , wn , t ∈ Z
as input, and need to decide whether there exists a subset X ⊆ [n] with j∈X wj = t. In the Knapsack
problem, we are additionally given integers
v1 , v2 , . . . , vn and are asked to find a subset X ⊆ [n] maximizing
P
P
w
v
subject
to
the
constraint
j∈X j ≤ t. While the study of Subset Sum is, among others,
j∈X j
motivated by cryptographic applications or balancing problems, Knapsack has numerous applications in
combinatorial optimization. We study the exact worst-case time complexity of these problems. The earliest
and probably most important algorithms for both problems are simple applications of dynamic programming,
pioneered by Bellman [5], solving both problems in O∗(t) time (where the O∗(·) notation suppresses factors
polynomial in the input size). In terms of n, the best algorithms for both problems are due to Schroeppel
and Shamir [18], using O∗(2n/2 ) time and O∗(2n/4 ) space, based on the meet-in-the-middle technique by
Horowitz and Sahni [9]. Nederlof et al. [16] show that there is an O∗(T n )-time, O∗(S n )-space algorithm for
Subset Sum if and only if there is an O∗(T n )-time, O∗(S n )-space algorithm for Knapsack. A major open
question since the paper by Horowitz and Sahni [9] is whether we can do “truly faster” for both problems:
Open Question 1: Can Subset Sum be solved in O∗ 2(0.5−δ)n time for some constant δ > 0?
In this paper we discuss Monte Carlo algorithms in the following sense: the algorithm never returns
false positives and constructs solutions of yes-instances with at least inverse polynomial probability. All
randomized algorithms discussed in this paper are of this type, but for Open Question 1 we would be
satisfied with two-sided error as well.
Zooming out, one motivation of this question is as follows. It is commonly believed that there are no
polynomial time or even sub-exponential time algorithms for Subset Sum. So how fast can the fastest
algorithm be? It would be an elegant situation if the simple meet-in-the-middle algorithm was optimal. But
this would also be quite surprising, and so we aim to show that at least this is not the case.
In 2010, Howgrave-Graham and Joux [10] gave an algorithm that answered Open Question 1 in the
affirmative in an average case setting. To state their result, let us describe the setting where it applies.
The density of a Subset Sum instance is defined as n/ log2 t. A random instance of density d > 0 is
constructed by fixing t ≈ 2n/d and picking the integers w1 , . . . , wn , t independently and uniformly at random
between 1 and 2n/d . Howgrave-Graham and Joux [10] showed that random instances of density 1 can be
solved in O∗(20.311n ) time, and later this has been improved to O∗(20.291n ) time by Becker et al. [4]. These
results resolve Open Question 1 in the average case setting since Impagliazzo and Naor [11] showed that
random instances are the hardest when they have density 1. Indeed, a vast body of research has given better
algorithms for random instances with density deviating from 1, like reductions of sparse instances to the
shortest vector problem (e.g. [14, 6]) and the algorithm by Flaxman and Przydatek [7].
The algorithms discussed thus far all use exponential space, which can be a serious bottleneck. Therefore
many studies also emphasize the setting where the algorithm is restricted to using polynomial space. It
is known that the running time of the dynamic programming based algorithms can be achieved also in
polynomial space: Lokshtanov and Nederlof [15] give polynomial space algorithms solving Subset Sum in
O∗(t) time and Knapsack in pseudo-polynomial time. On the other hand, in terms of n, no polynomial
space algorithm significantly faster than naïvely going through all 2n subsets is known, and the following
has been stated as an open problem by a number of researchers (see e.g. [20, 1]):
Open Question 2: Can Subset Sum be solved in polynomial space and O∗ 2(1−δ)n time for
some constant δ > 0?
1.1
Our results
We aim to make progress on Open Question 1, and show that a large class of instances can be solved truly
faster. An optimist may interpret this as an indication that truly faster algorithms indeed exist, while a
pessimist may conclude the remaining instances must be the (strictly) hardest instances.
1 Introduction
2
Algorithmic Results To define classes of instances that admit truly faster algorithms, we consider several
natural parameters. The key parameter that seems to capture
the range of our algorithmic technique the
P
best is the maximum bin size β(w) = maxx∈Z |{S ⊆ [n] : i∈S wi = x}|. Our main technical result is:
Theorem 1.1. There exists a Monte Carlo algorithm that, for any 0 ≤ ǫ ≤ 1/6, solves all instances of
2
Subset Sum with β(w) ≤ 2(0.5−ǫ)n in O∗ 2(0.5−ǫ/4+3ǫ /4)n time.
We have not optimized the precise constants in Theorem 1.1 – the main message is that any instance with
bin size up to 2(0.5−ǫ)n can be solved in time 2(0.5−Ω(ǫ))n . For ǫ ≥ 1/6, the running time of 223n/48 obtained
for ǫ = 1/6 is still valid since 2(0.5−1/6)n remains an upper bound on β(w). In a previous work [3], we solved
Subset Sum in time O∗(20.3399n β(w)4 ), which is faster than Theorem 1.1 for small β(w), but Theorem 1.1
shows that we can beat the meet-in-the-middle bound for a much wider class of instances.
From the other end, we also prove that when the maximum bin size becomes too large, we can again
solve Subset Sum truly faster:
Theorem 1.2. There exist a constant δ > 0 and
a deterministic algorithm that solves all instances of
Subset Sum with β(w) ≥ 20.661n in O∗ 2(0.5−δ)n time.
Combinatorial Results Given Theorem 1.1, a natural question is how instances with β(w) ≥ 20.5n look like.
This question is an instantiation of the inverse Littlewood-Offord problem, a subject well-studied in the field
of additive combinatorics. Ideally we would like to find structural properties of instances with β(w) ≥ 20.5n ,
that can be algorithmically exploited by other means than Theorem 1.1 in order to resolve Open Question 1
in the affirmative. While there is a large amount of literature on the inverse Littlewood-Offord problem, the
typical range of β(w) studied there is β(w) = 2n / poly(n) which is not relevant for our purposes. However,
we did manage to determine additional properties that any instance that is not solved by Theorem 1.1 must
satisfy.
In particular, we study a different natural parameter, the numberPof distinct sums generated by w,
defined as |w(2[n] )| = {w(X) : X ⊆ [n]} (where we denote w(X) =
i∈X wi ). This parameter can be
viewed as a measure of the “true” density of an instance, in the following sense. An instance with density
d = n/ log2 t has |w(2[n] )| ≤ n2n/d (assuming without loss of generality that t ≤ maxi wi ). On the other
hand, by standard hashing arguments (e.g., Lemma 2.2 with B = 10|w(2[n] )|), any instance can be hashed
down to an equivalent instance of density roughly n/ log2 |w(2[n] )|.
The relationship between |w(2[n] )| and β(w) is more complicated. Intuitively, one would expect that if
one has so much concentration that β(w) ≥ 20.5n , then w should not generate too many sums. We are
not aware of any such results from the additive combinatorics literature. However, by establishing a new
connection to Uniquely Decodable Code Pairs, a well-studied object in information theory, we can derive the
following bound.
Lemma 1.3. If |w(2[n] )| ≥ 20.997n then β(w) ≤ 20.4996n .
Unfortunately, we currently do not know how to algorithmically exploit |w(2[n] )| ≤ 20.997n . But we do
know how to exploit a set S with |S| ≤ n/2 and |w(2S )| ≤ 20.4999n (see Lemma 3.2). This suggests the
question of how large β(w) can be in instances lacking such an S, and we prove the following bound.
Lemma 1.4. There is a universal constant δ > 0 such that the following holds for all sufficiently large n. Let
S, T be a partition of [n] with |S| = |T | = n/2 such that |w(2S )|, |w(2T )| ≥ 2(1/2−δ)n . Then β(w) ≤ 20.661n .
Further Consequences Combining Lemma 1.3 and Theorem 1.1, we see directly that instances that generate almost 2n distinct sums can be solved faster than 20.5n .
Theorem 1.5. There exists a Monte Carlo algorithm that solves all instances of Subset Sum with |w(2[n] )| ≥
20.997n in time O∗ (20.49991n ).
Combining this with the view described above of |w(2[n] )| as a refined version of the density of an instance,
we have the following result, to support the title of our paper:
2 Preliminaries
3
Theorem 1.6. Suppose there exist a constant ǫ > 0 and an algorithm that solves all Subset Sum instances
of density at least 1.003 in time O∗(2(0.5−ǫ)n ). Then there exists a Monte Carlo algorithm that solves Subset
Sum in time O∗ 2max{0.49991,0.5−ǫ}n .
After the result by Howgrave-Graham and Joux [10], this may be a next step towards resolving Open
Question 1. Intuitively, one should be able to exploit the fact that the integers in a dense instance have
fewer than n bits. For example, even if only the target is picked uniformly at random, in expectation there
will be an exponential number of solutions, which can easily be exploited.1 .
Finally, let us note a somewhat curious consequence of our results. As mentioned earlier, in the context
of Open Question 2, it is known that the O∗(2n/d ) running time for instances of density d achieved through
dynamic programming can be achieved in polynomial space [15] (see also [13, Theorem 1(a)]). Combining
this with Corollary 1.5 and hashing, we directly get the following “interleaving” of Open Questions 1 and 2.
Corollary 1.7. There exist two Monte Carlo algorithms, one running in O∗(20.49991n ) time and the other
in O∗(20.999n ) time and polynomial space, such that every instance of Subset Sum is solved by at least one
of the algorithms.
Organization of the paper This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we review some preliminaries.
In Section 3, we provide the proofs of our main algorithmic results. In Section 4 we prove two combinatorial
lemmas. In Section 5 we give the proof for Theorem 1.6. Finally we end with some discussion on in Section 6.
2
Preliminaries
For a modulus m ∈ Z≥1 and x, y ∈ Z, we write x ≡ y (mod m), or x ≡m y for short, to indicate that m
divides x − y. Throughout this paper, w1 , w2 , . . . , wn , t will denote the input integers of a P
Subset Sum
instance. We associate the set function w : 2[n] → Z with these integers by letting w(X) = i∈X wi , and
for a set family F ⊆ 2[n] we write w(F ) for the image {w(X) : X ∈ F }.
Pℓ
Pℓ
For 0 ≤ x1 , x2 , . . . , xℓ ≤ 1 with i=1 xi = 1 we write h(x1 , x2 , . . . , xℓ ) = i=1 −xi log2 xi for the entropy
function. Here, 0 log2 0 should be interpreted as 0. We shorthand h(x, 1 − x) with h(x). We routinely use
the standard fact (easily proved using Stirling’s formula)
that for non-negative integers n1 , . . . , nℓ (where ℓ
n
h(n1 /n,...,nℓ /n)n
=
2
· poly(n).
is a constant) summing to n, it holds that n1 ,...,n
ℓ
Claim 2.1. For every sufficiently large integer r the following holds. If p is a prime between r and 2r
selected uniformly at random and x is a nonzero integer, then p divides x with probability at most (log2 x)/r.
Proof. By the Prime Number Theorem [8, p. 494, Eq. (22.19.3)], there are at least r/ log2 r primes between
r and 2r. A nonzero number x can have at most logr x prime factors larger than r. The probability that a
random prime between r and 2r is a factor of x is therefore at most (logr x) (r/ log2 r) = (log2 x)/r.
Lemma 2.2 (Bit-length reduction). There exists a randomized algorithm that takes as input a Subset Sum
instance w1 , w2 , . . . , wn , t ∈ Z and an integer B ∈ Z, and in time O∗ (1) outputs a new Subset Sum instance
w1′ , w2′ , . . . , wn′ , t′ ∈ Z such that with probability Ω∗ (1), the following properties all simultaneously hold.
1. 0 ≤ w1′ , w2′ , . . . , wn′ , t′ < 4nB log2 B.
2. If B ≥ 10 · |w(2[n] )|, then X ⊆ [n] satisfies w(X) = t if and only if w′ (X) = t′ .
3. If B ≥ 10 · |w(2[n] )|, then |w(2[n] )|/2 ≤ |w′ (2[n] )| ≤ n|w(2[n] )|.
4. If B ≥ 5 · |w(2[n] )|2 , then β(w)/n ≤ β(w′ ) ≤ β(w).
1 For example, assuming there are at least 2σn solutions for a constant σ ≥ 0, use a dynamic programming table data
structure to randomly sample the subsets in the congruence class t mod q for q a random prime with about (1 − σ)n/2 bits
within linear time per sample. A solution is found within O ∗(2(1−σ)n/2 ) samples with high probability.
3 Algorithmic Results
4
Proof. The algorithm picks a uniformly random prime p from the interval B log2 t ≤ p ≤ 2B log2 t. It then
outputs wi′ = wi mod p for each i = 1, 2, . . . , n and t′ = (t mod p) + r · p for a uniformly randomly chosen
r ∈ {0, . . . , n − 1}. The number of bits in p is O∗(1), so the reduction runs in O∗(1) time.
This construction might not satisfy Property 1 if t is very large – instead it satisfies the weaker bound
t′ < 2nB log2 t. The desired bound can be obtained by repeating the reduction O(1) times – e.g., if after
three steps t′′ is more than 2nB log2 B, then the original number t was triply exponential and the input
weights are so large that brute force time O∗(2n ) is O∗(1).
Consider any two sums y1 , y2 ∈ w(2[n] ) ∪ {t} with y1 6= y2 . We have y1 ≡p y2 if and only if p divides
x = y2 − y1 6= 0. Since 0 < |y2 − y1 | = |x| ≤ 2nt ≤ t2 (without loss of generality we assume t ≥ 2n
since otherwise dynamic programming lets us solve the instance in polynomial time), by Claim 2.1 we have
y1 ≡p y2 with probability at most (log2 |x|)/(B log2 t) ≤ 2/B.
To establish Property 2, we take a union bound over the |w(2[n] )| ≤ B/10 different sums y ∈ w(2[n] ) \ {t}
and deduce that with probability at least 4/5 over the choice of p, w(X) 6= t implies w′ (X) 6= t′ . In the
other direction, if w(X) = t, then w′ (X) = t′ with probability exactly 1/n over the choice of r.
For Property 3 the argument is similar: for any given sum y ∈ w(2[n] ), the probability that there
exists another sum y ′ 6= y that collides with y mod p is at most 1/5. By Markov’s inequality, this implies
that with probability at most 2/5, more than half of all y ∈ w(2[n] ) collide with some other sum y ′ mod p.
Conversely with probability at least 3/5, at least half of all y ∈ w(2[n] ) have no such collision, and in this case
|w′ (2[n] )| ≥ |w(2[n] )|/2. For the upper bound, two sets S1 , S2 with w(S1 ) = w(S2 ) have w′ (S1 ) ≡p w′ (S2 ).
Given w′ (S1 ) mod p, there are at most n possible different values for w′ (S1 ), so each bin of w(2[s] ) is split
into at most n bins after the hashing.
[n]
Finally, for Property 4, we use a union bound over all pairs of sums in w(22 ) . Since B ≥ 5|w(2[n] )|2 ≥
[n]
10 |w(22 )| , with probability at least 4/5, no two sums y1 , y2 ∈ w(2[n] ) are hashed to the same value mod p
and thus β(w′ ) ≤ β(w). For the lower bound, we have as before that each original bin is split into at most
n bins after hashing, and the largest of these must be at least a 1/n fraction of the original bin size.
Now we combine the above bounds to bound the probability all properties hold simultaneously: taking
a union bound over the events depending on p, we have that with probability at least 1/5, w(X) 6= t implies
w′ (X) 6= t′ , and Properties 3 and 4 are satisfied. Conditioned on this, the final good event, that w(X) = t
implies w′ (X) = t still happens with probability 1/n since r is independent of p.
3
Algorithmic Results
This section establishes Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. We begin with two lemmas showing how one can exploit a
subset of the input integers if it generates either many or few distinct sums. The case of many sums is the
main technical challenge and addressed by the following result, which is our main algorithmic contribution.
Lemma 3.1. There is a randomized algorithm that, given positive integers w1 , . . . , wn , t ≤ 2O(n) and a set
[n]
M ∈ µn
satisfying µ ≤ 0.5 and |w(2M )| ≥ 2γ|M| for some γ ∈ [0, 1], finds a subset X ⊆ [n] satisfying
w(X) = t with probability Ω∗(1) (if such an X exists) in time O∗ 2(0.5+0.8113µ−γµ)n + β(w)2(1.5−γ)µn .
The proof is given in Section 3.1. Informally, it uses an algorithm that simultaneously applies the meetin-the-middle technique of Horowitz and Sahni [9] on the set [n] \ M and the “representation technique” of
Howgrave-Graham and Joux [10] on the set M . Specifically, we pick an arbitrary equi-sized partition L, R
of [n] \ M and construct lists L ⊆ 2L∪M and R ⊆ 2R∪M . Note that without restrictions on L and R, one
solution X is witnessed by 2|M∩X| pairs (S, T ) from L × R in the sense that S ∪ T = X. Now the crux is
that since M generates many sums, M ∩ X generates many sums (say 2π|M| ): this allows us to uniformly
choose a congruence class tL of Zp where p is a random prime of order 2π|M| and restrict attention only to
sets S ⊆ L ∪ M and T ⊆ R ∪ M such that w(S) ≡p tL and w(T ) ≡p t − tL , while still finding solutions with
good probability. This ensures that the to-be-constructed
lists L and R are small enough. As an indication
M∩X
for this, note that if |M ∩ X| = |M |/2 and |w( |M|/4
)| is Ω(2|M|/2 ), the expected sizes of L and R are at
most 2((1−µ)/2+h(1/4)µ−µ/2)n ≤ 2(1/2−0.18µ)n .
In contrast to Lemma 3.1, it is straightforward to exploit a small subset that generates few sums:
3 Algorithmic Results
5
[n]
Lemma 3.2. There is a deterministic algorithm that, given positive integers w1 , . . . , wn , t and a set M ∈ µn
satisfying µ ≤ 0.5 and |w(2M )| ≤ 2γ|M| for some γ ∈ [0, 1], finds a subset X ⊆ [n] satisfying w(X) = t (if
1−µ(1−γ)
n
2
such an X exists) in time O∗ 2
.
Proof. Let L be an arbitrary subset of [n] \ M of size
2
1−µ(1−γ)
n
2
1−µ(1−γ)
n
2
, and
|w(2R )| ≤ |w(2M )| · |w(2[n]\L\M )| ≤ 2γµn 2(1−
and let R = [n] \ L. Then |w(2L )| ≤ 2|L| =
1−µ(1−γ)
−µ
2
n
)n = 2 1−µ(1−γ)
2
.
Now apply routine dynamic programming to construct w(2L ) in time O∗ (|w(2L )|) and w(2R ) in time
O∗ (|w(2R )|); build a look-up table data structure for w(2L ), and for each x ∈ w(2R ), check in O(n) time
whether t − x ∈ w(2L ).
Given these lemmas, we are now in the position to exploit small bins:
Proof of Theorem 1.1. We start by preprocessing the input with Lemma 2.2, taking B = 23n ≫ |w(2[n] )|2 .
Let γ = 1 − ǫ/2, µ = 3ǫ/2, and partition [n] into 1/µ parts M1 , . . . , M1/µ of size at most µn arbitrarily.
We distinguish two cases. First, suppose that |w(2Mi )| ≥ 2γµn for some Mi (note that this can be easily
determined within the claimed time bound). We then apply the algorithm of Lemma 3.1 with M = Mi and
solve the instance (with probability Ω∗ (1)) in time
O∗ 2(0.5+0.8113µ−γµ)n + β(w)2(1.5−γ)µn .
The coefficient of the exponent of the first term is 0.5+0.8113·3ǫ/2−(1−ǫ/2)·3ǫ/2 = 0.5−0.28305ǫ+0.75ǫ2.
The coefficient of the exponent of the second term is 0.5 − ǫ + (1.5 − (1 − ǫ/2)) · 3ǫ/2 = 0.5 − ǫ/4 + 0.75ǫ2.
1
S 2µ
Mi and R = [n] \ M . We see that
Second, suppose that |w(2Mi )| ≤ 2γµn for all i. Let L = i=1
Y
Y
and
|w(2R )| ≤
|w(2Mi )| ≤ 2γn/2
|w(2Mi )| ≤ 2γn/2 .
|w(2L )| ≤
1
i≤ 2µ
1
i> 2µ
Using standard dynamic programming to construct w(2L ) and w(2R ) in O∗ (|w(2L )|) and O∗ (|w(2R )|) time,
we can therefore solve the instance within O∗(2γn/2 ) = O∗(2(0.5−ǫ/4)n ) time using linear search.
Exploiting large bins is easy using Lemma 1.4:
Proof of Theorem 1.2. Pick an arbitrary equi-sized partition S, T of [n]. By the contrapositive of Lemma 1.4,
one of S and T generates at most 2(1/2−δ)n sums. Applying Lemma 3.2 with the set in question as M , we
get a running time of O∗ 2(1−δ)n/2 .
The proof of Lemma 1.4 is given in Section 4.
3.1
Proof of Lemma 3.1
We now prove Lemma 3.1. Let s := |X ∩ M |. Without loss of generality, we may assume that s ≥ |M |/2
(by considering the actual target t and the complementary target t′ := w([n]) − t). We may further assume
that s is known by trying all O(n) possible values. The algorithm is listed in Algorithm 1.
Running time We focus on the expected running time of Algorithm 1 (by returning no after running the
algorithm at least twice its expected number of steps, this is sufficient). We will analyze the algorithm in
two parts: (i) the generation of the lists L and R on Lines
and 10, and (ii) the iteration over pairs in L × R
9 λn
≤
2
2h(σ1 )µn = 2((1−µ)/2+h(σ/2)µ)n denote the size
in Line 11 (the typical bottleneck). Let WL := 2|L| M
s1
of the search space for L.
1/2
Proposition
3.3. The lists L and R in Lines 9 and 10 can be constructed in expected time O∗ WL
WL /2πµn , where the expectation is over the choice of p and tL .
+
3 Algorithmic Results
6
Algorithm A(w1 , . . . , wn , t, M, s, γ)
Assumes |w(2M )| ≥ 2γ|M|
Output: yes, if there exists an X ⊆ [n] with w(X) = t and |X ∩ M | = s
1: Let σ = s/|M |
2: Let π = γ − 1 + σ
3: Pick a random prime p satisfying 2π|M| ≤ p ≤ 2π|M|+1
4: Pick a random number 0 ≤ tL ≤ p − 1
5: for all 0 ≤ s1 ≤ s2 ≤ |M | such that s1 + s2 = s do
6:
Let σ1 = s1 /|M |, σ2 = s2 /|M |
7:
Let λ = (1 − µ)/2 + h(σ/2) − h(σ1 ) µ
8:
Let L, R be an arbitrary partition of [n] \ M such that |L| = ⌈λn⌉
9:
Construct L = {S ∈ 2L∪M : w(S) ≡p tL and |S ∩ M | = s1 }
10:
Construct R = {T ∈ 2R∪M : w(T ) ≡p t − tL and |T ∩ M | = s2 }
11:
for all (S, T ) ∈ L × R such that w(S) + w(T ) = t do
12:
if S ∩ T = ∅ then return yes
13: return no
Algorithm 1: Exploiting a small subset generating many sums.
1/2
Proof. By splitting the search space for L appropriately, we get two “halves” each of which has size WL .
Specifically, we arbitrarily pick a subset L1 ⊆ L of size λ1 n with λ1 = (λ + h(σ/2)µ)/2
and generate using
}.
Then
we
store w(2L1 ) in a
brute-force w(2L1 ) and w(L2 ) where L2 = {Y ∪ Z : Y ⊆ L \ L1 and Z ∈ M
s1
dictionary data structure and, for each sum x ∈ w(L2 ), we look up all solutions with sum t − x mod p in the
1/2
dictionary of w(2L1 ) and list for such a pair its union. This yields a running time of O∗(|L| + WL ). The
expected size of |L| over the random choices of tL is E[|L|] ≤ O(WL /2πµn ).
1/2
The analysis for R is analogous and we get a running time of O∗ WR +WR /2πµn where WR := 2|R| |M|
s2 .
Let ρ = |R|/n. Since h(·) is concave and, in particular, h(σ1 ) + h(σ2 ) ≤ 2h(σ/2), we then have (up to a
negligible term caused by rounding λn to an integer)
ρ = 1 − µ − λ = (1 − µ)/2 − h(σ/2) − h(σ1 ) µ ≤ (1 − µ)/2 + (h(σ/2) − h(σ2 ))µ .
Thus the case of R is symmetric to the situation for L and we have WR ≤ 2((1−µ)/2+h(σ/2)µ)n = O∗ (WL ).
The term WL /2πµn can be bounded by using the definition of π = γ − 1 + σ and we get
1
1
WL /2πµn = 2( 2 +µ( 2 +h(σ/2)−γ−σ))n .
Since 1/2 + h(σ/2) − σ subject to 1/2 ≤ σ ≤ 1 is maximized at σ = 1/2 where it is h(1/4) ≤ 0.8113, we have
that WL /2πµn ≤ 2(0.5+0.8113µ−γµ)n .
1/2
The term WL is naively bounded by 2(1+µ)n/4 , which is dominated by the term O∗ 2(0.5+0.8113µ−γµ)n
since µ ≤ 1/2 and γ ≤ 1. It follows that Line 9 and Line 10 indeed run within the claimed time bounds.
Proposition 3.4. The expected number of pairs considered in Line 11 is O∗ β(w)2µ(1.5−γ)n , where the
expectation is over the choice of p and tL .
Proof. Define
B = (P, Q) ∈ 2[n] × 2M : w(P ) + w(Q) = t ,
and note that the set of pairs (S, T ) ∈ 2L∪M × 2R∪M satisfying w(S) + w(T ) = t are in one-to-one correspondence with pairs in B (by the map (S, T ) 7→ (S ∪ (T ∩ R), T ∩ M )). Furthermore, the size of B is bounded
by |B| ≤ β(w)2|M| : for each of the 2|M| possible choices of Q, there are at most β(w) subsets R that sum to
t − w(Q).
Any given pair (S, T ) ∈ 2L∪M × 2R∪M satisfying w(L) + w(R) = t is considered only if w(S) ≡p tL , which
happens with probability O(2−πn ) (over the uniformly random choice of tL ). Thus the expected number
of pairs considered in Line 11 is upper bounded by O(|B|/2πµn ) = O(β(w)2µ(1−π)n ) = O(β(w)2µ(2−σ−γ)n ).
Using σ ≥ 1/2, the desired bound follows.
4 Combinatorial Results (Lemma 1.3 and Lemma 1.4)
7
Correctness Suppose there exists an X ⊆ [n] with w(X) = t and |X ∩M | = s. Note that 2γ|M| ≤ |w(2M )| ≤
|w(2M∩X )| · |w(2M\X )|, and since |w(2M\X )| ≤ 2|M|−s , we have that|w(2M∩X )| ≥ 2γ|M|−(1−σ)|M| = 2π|M| .
)| ≥ 2π|M| /|M |. Let us focus on the
Thus there must exist positive s1 + s2 = s such that |w( M∩X
s1
corresponding iteration of Algorithm 1. Let wL := w(X ∩ L) be the contribution of L to the solution X. We
claim that in this iteration, the following holds.
Proposition 3.5.
M ∩X
1
Pr ∃Q ∈
.
: w(Q) ≡p tL − wL ≥ Ω
s1
|M |
(3.1)
Note that this is sufficient for establishing correctness of the algorithm, since conditioned on this event,
Algorithm 1 will include S := Q ∪ (L ∩ X) in L and T := X \ S in R, and the algorithm recovers X.
| ≥
be a maximal injective subset, i.e., satisfying |F | = |w(F )| = |w M∩X
Proof. Let F ⊆ M∩X
s1
s1
Ω∗ (2π|M| ). Let ci = | {Y ∈ F : w(Y ) ≡p i} | be the number of sets from F in the i’th bin mod p. Our goal
is to lower bound the probability that ctL −wL > 0 (where tL − wL is taken modulo p). We can bound the
expected ℓ2 norm (e.g., the number of collisions) by
X
X
(3.2)
Pr p divides w(Y ) − w(Z) ≤ |F | + O∗ |F |2 /2π|M| ,
c2i =
E
i
Y,Z∈F
where
uses Claim 2.1 and the assumption that the wi ’s are 2O(n) . By Markov’s inequality,
P 2 the ∗inequality
2
π|M|
) with probability at least Ω∗ (1) over the choice of p (here we used |F | = Ω∗ (2π|M| )
i ci ≤ O (|F | /2
to conclude that the second term in (3.2) dominates
on this, Cauchy-Schwarz implies
Pthe2 first).∗ Conditioned
π|M|
that the number of non-zero ci ’s is at least |F |2
c
≥
Ω
(2
).
When
this happens, the probability
i i
that ctL −wL > 0 (over the uniformly random choice of tL ) is Ω∗ (1).
This concludes the proof of Lemma 3.1.
4
Combinatorial Results (Lemma 1.3 and Lemma 1.4)
In this section we provide two non-trivial quantitative relations between several structural parameters of the
weights. Our results are by no means tight, but will be sufficient for proving our main results.
For the purposes of this section, itPis convenient to use vector notation for subset sums. In particular,
for a vector x ∈ Zn , we write x · w = ni=1 xi wi , and x−1 (j) ⊆ [n] for the set of i ∈ [n] such that vi = j.
Our approach to relate the number of sums |w(2[n] )| to the largest bin size β(w) is to establish a connection
to the notion of Uniquely Decodable Code Pairs from information theory, defined as follows.
Definition 4.1 (Uniquely Decodable Code Pair, UDCP). If A, B ⊆ {0, 1}n such that
|A + B| = |{a + b : a ∈ A, b ∈ B}| = |A| · |B| ,
then (A, B) is called uniquely decodable. Note that here addition is performed over Zn (and not mod Zn2 ).
UDCP’s capture the zero error region of the so-called binary adder channel, and there is a fair amount of
work on how large the sets A and B can be (for a survey, see [19, §3.5.1]). The connection between UDCP’s
and Subset Sum is that a Subset Sum instance that both generates many sums and has a large bin yields
a large UDCP, as captured in the following proposition.
Proposition 4.2. If there exist weights w1 , . . . , wn such that |w(2[n] )| = a and β(w) = b, then there exists
a UDCP (A, B) with |A| = a and |B| = b.
Proof. Let A ⊆ {0, 1}n be an injective set, i.e., x · w 6= x′ · w for all x, x′ ∈ A with x 6= x′ . Note that there
exists such an A with |A| = a. Let B ⊆ {0, 1}n be a bin, i.e., y · w = y ′ · w for all y, y ′ ∈ B. Note that we
can take these to have sizes |A| = a and |B| = b.
We claim that (A, B) is a UDCP. To see this, let x, x′ ∈ A and y, y ′ ∈ B with x + y = x′ + y ′ . Then
x · w + y · w = (x + y) · w = (x′ + y ′ ) · w = x′ · w + y ′ · w .
4 Combinatorial Results (Lemma 1.3 and Lemma 1.4)
8
Thus x · w = x′ · w, and so by the injectivity property of A, we have x = x′ , which in turn implies y = y ′
since x + y = x′ + y ′ .
We have the following result by Ordentlich and Shayevitz [17, Theorem 1, setting R1 = 0.997 and
α = 0.07].
Theorem 4.3 ([17]). Let A, B ⊆ {0, 1}n such that (A, B) is a UDCP and |A| ≥ 2.997n . Then |B| ≤ 20.4996n .
With this connection in place, the proof of Lemma 1.3 is immediate.
Lemma 1.3 (restated). If |w(2[n] )| ≥ 20.997n , then β(w) ≤ 20.4996n .
Proof. Combine Theorem 4.3 with the contrapositive of Proposition 4.2.
The remainder of this section is devoted to Lemma 1.4:
Lemma 1.4 (restated). There is a universal constant δ > 0 such that the following holds for all sufficiently
large n. Let S, T be a partition of [n] with |S| = |T | = n/2 such that |w(2S )|, |w(2T )| ≥ 2(1/2−δ)n . Then
β(w) ≤ 20.661n .
The proof also (implictly) uses a connection to Uniquely Decodable Code Pairs, but here the involved
sets of strings are not binary. There is no reason to believe that the constant 0.661 is tight. However, because
a random instance w of density 2 satisfies the hypothesis for all partitions S, T and has β(w) ≈ 20.5n with
good probability, just improving the constant 0.661 will not suffice for settling Open Question 1.
4.1
Proof of Lemma 1.4
For a subset S ⊆ [n], define a function bS : Z → Z by letting bS (x) be the number of subsets of S that sum
to x. Note that |w(2S )| equals the support size of bS , or kbS k0 , and that βw (S) = maxx bS (x) = kbS k∞ .
Instead of working with these extremes, it is more convenient to work with the ℓ2 norm of bS , and the main
technical claim to obtain Lemma 1.4 is the following.
Proposition 4.4. There exists a δ > 0 such that for all sufficiently large |S| the following holds: if |w(2S )| ≥
2(1−δ)|S| , then kbS k2 ≤ 20.661|S| .
Using Proposition 4.4, the desired bound of Lemma 1.4 follows immediately, since
X
bS (y)bT (x − y) ≤ max kbS k2 kbT k2 ≤ 20.661n ,
β([n]) = max
x∈Z
x∈Z
y∈Z
where the first inequality is by Cauchy–Schwarz and the second inequality by Proposition 4.4.
Proof of Proposition 4.4. Without loss of generality we take S = [n], and to simplify notation we omit the
subscript S from bS and simply write b : Z → Z for the function such that b(r) is the number of subsets of
w1 , . . . , wn summing to r. Note that
X
X
X
−1
[y · w = 0] · 2|y (0)| ,
[w(U ) = w(V )] · 2n−|U|−|V | =
[w(U ) = w(V )] =
kbk22 =
U,V ⊆[n]
y∈{−1,0,1}n
U,V ⊆[n]
U∩V =∅
where [p] denotes 1 if p holds and 0 otherwise. Defining Bσ = y ∈ {−1, 0, 1}n : y · w = 0 and kyk1 = σn ,
we thus have
n
X
kbk22 =
|Bi/n |2n−i ≤ n max |Bσ |2(1−σ)n .
(4.1)
i=0
σ
We now proceed to bound the size of Bσ by an encoding argument. To this end, let A ⊆ {0, 1}n be a
maximal injective set of vectors. In other words, |A| = |w(2[n] )| ≥ 20.99n , and for all pairs x 6= x′ ∈ A, it
holds that x · w 6= x′ · w. We claim that |A + Bσ | = |A| · |Bσ |. To see this note that, similarly to the proof
of Proposition 4.2, if x + y = x′ + y ′ (with x, x′ ∈ A and y, y ′ ∈ Bσ ) then x · w = x′ · w (since y ′ · w = 0) and
thus x = x′ and y = y ′ .
4 Combinatorial Results (Lemma 1.3 and Lemma 1.4)
9
Define Pσ to be all pairs (x, y) in A × Bσ that are balanced, in the sense that for some γ > 0 the following
conditions hold:
|x−1 (1) ∩ y −1 (−1)| = 12 |y −1 (−1)| ± γn ,
|x−1 (1) ∩ y −1 (0)| = 21 |y −1 (0)| ± γn ,
−1
(4.2)
−1
−1
|x (1) ∩ y (1)| = 12 |y (1)| ± γn .
√
Claim 4.5. For γ = δ and n sufficiently large, we have that |Pσ | ≥ |A| · |Bσ |/2.
Proof. We prove the claim by giving an upper bound on the number of pairs that are not balanced. Note
that if a pair (x, y) is not balanced, there must exist a j ∈ {−1, 0, 1} such that (4.2) fails. Let us proceed
with fixing a y ∈ Bσ and upper bounding the number of x ∈ A such that
|x−1 (1) ∩ y −1 (j)| − 12 |y −1 (j)| > γn .
(4.3)
Recall the following basic property of the binary entropy function.
Fact 4.6. For all α ∈ 0, 12 , it holds that h 21 − α ≤ 1 − 2α2 / ln 2.
Using this bound, the number of x satisfying (4.3) is at most
n max 2h(α)n ≤ n2(1−2γ
2
/ ln 2)n
α≤1/2−γ
,
2
and thus the number of pairs not balanced it√
at most 3n2(1−2γ / ln 2)n |Bσ |. This is clearly at most a constant
fraction of |A| · |Bσ | by the assumption γ = δ.
√
Setting γ = δ, we can now proceed to upper bound |Pσ |. Consider the encoding η : Pσ → {−1, 0, 1, 2}n
defined by η(x, y) = x + y. By the property |A + Bσ | = |A| · |B|, it follows that η is an injection, and thus
|Pσ | equals the size of the image of η. For a pair (x, y) ∈ Pσ , if y ∈ Bσ has τ σn many 1’s, and (1 − τ )σn
many −1’s, then z = η(x, y) has the following frequency distribution:
|z −1 (−1)|
τσ
=
± oγ (1) ,
n
2
1−σ
(1 − τ )σ
|z −1 (1)|
=
+
± oγ (1) ,
n
2
2
|z −1 (0)|
τσ
1−σ
=
+
± oγ (1) ,
n
2
2
|z −1 (2)|
(1 − τ )σ
=
± oγ (1) ,
n
2
√
where, for a variable ǫ, we write oǫ (1) to indicate a term that converges to 0 when ǫ tends to 0. Since γ = δ,
we have oγ (1) = oδ (1). The number of z’s with such a frequency distribution is bounded by
n
oδ (1)n
.
(4.4)
(1−τ )σ
(1−τ )σ 2
τσ
1−σ
1−σ
τσ
n,
(
+
)n,
(
+
)n,
2
2
2
2
2
2
Then, |Pσ | is bounded by
log |Pσ | ≤ max g(σ, τ ) + oγ (1) n, where g(σ, τ ) = h τ2σ , τ2σ +
τ ∈[0,1]
1−σ 1−σ
2 , 2
It can be verified that g(σ, τ ) is maximized for τ = 1/2 and we have
max g(σ, τ ) = h σ4 , 21 − σ4 , 21 − σ4 , σ4 = 1 + h
τ ∈[0,1]
Combining this with the bounds |Pσ | ≥ |A|·|B|·2−O(δ
Plugging this into (4.1) we see that
2
)n
σ
2
+
(1−τ )σ (1−τ )σ
, 2
2
.
.
and |A| ≥ 2(1−δ)n , we get that |Bσ | ≤ 2(h(σ/2)+oδ (1))n .
kbk22 ≤ max 2(1+h(σ/2)−σ+oǫ (1))n .
σ
The expression h(σ/2) − σ is maximized at σ = 2/5, and we obtain
kbk22 ≤ 2(h(1/5)+3/5+oǫ (1)) ≤ 2(1.32195+oδ (1))n .
Thus if δ is sufficiently small, we have kbk22 ≤ 21.322n , as desired.
5 Proof of Theorem 1.6
5
10
Proof of Theorem 1.6
Proof of Theorem 1.6. Given oracle access to an algorithm that solves Subset Sum instance of density
at least 1.003 in constant time, we solve an arbitrary instance w1 , w2 , . . . , wn , t of Subset Sum in time
O∗ (20.49991n ) as follows.
As Step 1, run the algorithm of Theorem 1.5 for Θ∗ (20.49991n ) timesteps. If it terminates within this
number of steps, return YES if it found a solution and NO otherwise. Otherwise, as Step 2, run the
preprocessing of Lemma 2.2 with B = 10 · 20.997n . This yields a new instance with density 1/0.997 > 1.003,
which we solve using the presumed oracle for such instances. If the oracle returns a solution, we verify that
it is indeed a solution to our original instance and if so return YES. Otherwise we return NO.
If there is no solution this algorithm clearly returns NO. If there is a solution and |w(2[n] )| ≥ 20.997n , we
find a solution with inversely polynomial probability in Step 1. If there is a solution and |w(2[n] )| ≤ 20.997n ,
Property 2 of Lemma 2.2 guarantees that the solution to the reduced instance is a solution to the original
instance with probability Ω∗ (1), and the oracle will then provide us with the solution.
6
Further Discussion
Our original ambition was to resolve Open Question 1 affirmatively by a combination of two algorithms that
exploit small and large concentration of the sums, respectively. Since we only made some partial progress
on this, it remains an intruiging question whether this approach can fulfill this ambition. In this section we
speculate about some further directions to explore.
Exploiting Large Density For exploiting a density 1.003 ≤ d ≤ 2, the meet-in-the-middle technique [9] does
not seem directly extendable. A different, potentially more applicable O∗ (2n/2 ) algorithm works as follows:
pick a prime p of order 2n/2 , build the dynamic programming table that counts the number of subsets with
sum congruence to t mod p, and use this as a data structure to uniformly sample solutions mod p with linear
delay; try O∗ (2n/2 ) samples and declare a no-instance if no true solution is found (see also Footnote 1). As
such, this does not exploit large density at all, but to this end one could seek a similar sampler that is more
biased to smaller bins.
Sharper Analysis of Algorithm 1 The analysis of Algorithm 1 in Lemma 3.1, and in particular the typical
bottleneck β(w)2(1.5−γ)µn in the running time, is quite naive. For example, since we can pick M as we
like (and assume it generates many sums), for the algorithm to fail we need an instance where big bins
are encountered by the algorithm for many choices of M . It might be a good approach to first try to
extend the set of instances that can be solved ‘truly faster’ in this way, e.g. to the set of all instances with
β(w) ≤ 2(.5+δ)n for some small δ > 0.
As an illustration of the looseness, let us mention that in a previous version of this manuscript, we used
a more sophisticated analysis to show the following: there exists some δ > 0, such that if |w(2[n] )| ≥ 2(1−δ)n ,
then
2
[n]
|{(P, Q) ∈
: w(P ) + w(Q) = t}| ≤ 20.5254n .
n/2
We used this to show that all instances with |w(2[n] )| ≥ 2(1−δ)n can be solved via a mild variant of Algorithm 1
with M = [n], indicating that Algorithm 1 gives non-trivial algorithms even for large M .
Sharper Combinatorial Bounds Lemma 1.3 and Lemma 1.4 seem to be rather crude estimates. In fact, we
don’t even know the following (again, borrowing notation from the proof of Proposition 4.4):
Open Question 3: Suppose |w(2[n] )| ≥ 2(1−ǫ)n . Can β(w) and kb[n] k2 be bounded by 2oǫ (1)n and
2(0.5+oǫ (1))n , respectively?
6 Further Discussion
11
Note that the second bound would follow from the first bound. Furthermore, if the second bound holds,
′
we would be able to solve, for all ǫ > 0, all instances with |β(w)| ≥ 2(0.5+ǫ)n in time O∗(2(0.5−ǫ )n ) for some
ǫ′ > 0 depending on ǫ, via the proof of Theorem 1.2.
In recent work [2] we proved the following modest progress
Lemma 6.1. There exists δ > 0 such that if A, B ⊆ {0, 1}n is a UDCP and |A| ≥ 2(1−δ)n , then |B| ≤
20.4115n .
Plugging this into the proof of Lemma 1.3, this gives that β(w) ≤ 2(0.4115+oǫ (1))n in the setting of Open
Question 3. We would like to remark that improving this beyond 2(0.25+oǫ (1))n via Lemma 1.3 is not possible
since UDCP pairs (A, B) with |A| ≥ 2(1−o(1))n and |B| ≥ 2n/4 do exist [12].
One may also wonder whether we can deal with instances with |w(2[n] )| ≥ 2(0.5+ǫ)n , for all ǫ > 0 by
arguing β(w) must be small but this does not work directly: there are instances with |w(2[n] )| = 3n/2 and
β(w) = 2n/2 (the instance 1, 1, 3, 3, 9, 9, 27, 27, . . . has this, though is it easily attacked via Lemma 3.2).
Acknowledgements
This research was funded in part by the Swedish Research Council, Grant 621-2012-4546 (P.A.), the European
Research Council, Starting Grant 338077 “Theory and Practice of Advanced Search and Enumeration” (P.K.),
the Academy of Finland, Grant 276864 “Supple Exponential Algorithms” (M.K.), and by the NWO VENI
project 639.021.438 (J.N.).
References
[1] Open problems for FPT school 2014. http://fptschool.mimuw.edu.pl/opl.pdf.
[2] Per Austrin, Petteri Kaski, Mikko Koivisto, and Jesper Nederlof. Improved uniquely decodable code pair bounds
for unbalanced pairs. Unpublished.
[3] Per Austrin, Petteri Kaski, Mikko Koivisto, and Jesper Nederlof. Subset sum in the absence of concentration. In
Ernst W. Mayr and Nicolas Ollinger, editors, 32nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer
Science, STACS 2015, March 4-7, 2015, Garching, Germany, volume 30 of LIPIcs, pages 48–61. Schloss Dagstuhl
- Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2015.
[4] Anja Becker, Jean-Sébastien Coron, and Antoine Joux. Improved generic algorithms for hard knapsacks. In
Kenneth G. Paterson, editor, EUROCRYPT, volume 6632 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 364–385.
Springer, 2011.
[5] Richard Bellman. Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1957.
[6] Matthijs J. Coster, Antoine Joux, Brian A. Lamacchia, Andrew M. Odlyzko, Claus-Peter Schnorr, and Jacques
Stern. Improved low-density subset sum algorithms. Computational Complexity, 2:111–128, 1992.
[7] Abraham Flaxman and Bartosz Przydatek. Solving medium-density subset sum problems in expected polynomial
time. In Volker Diekert and Bruno Durand, editors, STACS 2005, 22nd Annual Symposium on Theoretical
Aspects of Computer Science, Stuttgart, Germany, February 24-26, 2005, Proceedings, volume 3404 of Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 305–314. Springer, 2005.
[8] Godfrey H. Hardy and Edward M. Wright. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, sixth edition, 2008. Revised by D. R. Heath-Brown and J. H. Silverman, With a foreword by Andrew
Wiles.
[9] Ellis Horowitz and Sartaj Sahni. Computing partitions with applications to the knapsack problem. J. ACM,
21(2):277–292, 1974.
[10] Nick Howgrave-Graham and Antoine Joux. New generic algorithms for hard knapsacks. In Henri Gilbert, editor,
EUROCRYPT, volume 6110 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 235–256. Springer, 2010.
[11] Russell Impagliazzo and Moni Naor. Efficient cryptographic schemes provably as secure as subset sum. Journal
of Cryptology, 9(4):199–216, 1996.
[12] T. Kasami, Shu Lin, V.K. Wei, and Saburo Yamamura. Graph theoretic approaches to the code construction for
the two-user multiple-access binary adder channel. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 29(1):114–130,
1983.
6 Further Discussion
12
[13] Petteri Kaski, Mikko Koivisto, and Jesper Nederlof. Homomorphic hashing for sparse coefficient extraction. In
Dimitrios M. Thilikos and Gerhard J. Woeginger, editors, Parameterized and Exact Computation - 7th International Symposium, IPEC 2012, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September 12-14, 2012. Proceedings, volume 7535 of Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 147–158. Springer, 2012.
[14] Jeffrey C. Lagarias and Andrew M. Odlyzko. Solving low-density subset sum problems. J. ACM, 32(1):229–246,
1985.
[15] Daniel Lokshtanov and Jesper Nederlof. Saving space by algebraization. In Leonard J. Schulman, editor, STOC,
pages 321–330. ACM, 2010.
[16] Jesper Nederlof, Erik Jan van Leeuwen, and Ruben van der Zwaan. Reducing a target interval to a few exact
queries. In Branislav Rovan, Vladimiro Sassone, and Peter Widmayer, editors, Mathematical Foundations of
Computer Science 2012 - 37th International Symposium, MFCS 2012, Bratislava, Slovakia, August 27-31, 2012.
Proceedings, volume 7464 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 718–727. Springer, 2012.
[17] Or Ordentlich and Ofer Shayevitz. A VC-dimension-based outer bound on the zero-error capacity of the binary
adder channel. CoRR, abs/1412.8670, 2014.
[18] Richard Schroeppel and Adi Shamir. A T = O(2n/2 ), S = O(2n/4 ) algorithm for certain NP-complete problems.
SIAM J. Comput., 10(3):456–464, 1981.
[19] Christian Sleger and Alex Grant. Coordinated Multiuser Communications. Springer, 2006.
[20] Gerhard J. Woeginger. Open problems around exact algorithms. Discrete Appl. Math., 156(3):397–405, 2008.
| 8cs.DS
|
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS, KOSZUL DUALITY,
AND A COMPLETE INTERSECTION ANALOGUE OF THE
EAGON–NORTHCOTT COMPLEX
arXiv:1312.2255v2 [math.AC] 7 Sep 2016
STEVEN V SAM
Abstract. We study the ideal of maximal minors in Littlewood varieties, a class of quadratic complete intersections in spaces of matrices. We give a geometric construction for a
large class of modules, including all powers of this ideal, and show that they have a linear free
resolution over the complete intersection and that their Koszul dual is an infinite-dimensional
irreducible representation of the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra. We calculate the algebra of cohomology operators acting on this free resolution. We prove analogous results for
powers of the ideals of maximal minors in the variety of length 2 complexes when it is a
complete intersection, and show that their Koszul dual is an infinite-dimensional irreducible
representation of the general linear Lie superalgebra.
This generalizes work of Akin, Józefiak, Pragacz, Weyman, and the author on resolutions of determinantal ideals in polynomial rings to the setting of complete intersections
and provides a new connection between representations of classical Lie superalgebras and
commutative algebra. As a curious application, we prove that the cohomology of a class
of reducible homogeneous bundles on symplectic and orthogonal Grassmannians and 2-step
flag varieties can be calculated by an analogue of the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem.
Contents
1
4
11
23
29
33
1. Introduction
2. Preliminaries
3. Symplectic Littlewood varieties
4. Orthogonal Littlewood varieties
5. Variety of complexes
References
1. Introduction
In this paper, we are interested on the one hand with representations of orthosymplectic
Lie superalgebras (a family of simple Lie superalgebras), and on the other hand, with free
resolutions over a class of quadratic complete intersections which we call Littlewood varieties
(see [SW]). To avoid clumsy technicalities, we will not distinguish between affine varieties
and their coordinate rings. The two sides of the story are connected by Koszul duality.
Date: September 7, 2016.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13D02, 13C40, 17B10, 17B55, 18G10.
The author was supported by a Miller research fellowship.
1
2
STEVEN V SAM
First, it is well-known that quadratic complete intersections, that is, polynomial rings
modulo an ideal generated by a regular sequence of quadratic polynomials, are Koszul algebras (this notion and the following notions are reviewed in §2.2). So it has a Koszul dual,
which is the universal enveloping algebra of a nilpotent Lie superalgebra. By generalities
!
on Koszul duality, if R is a Koszul k-algebra and RL
is its Koszul dual, then for any finitely
R
!
∗
generated graded R-module M, the space M =
d≥0 Tord (M, k) is naturally a finitely
generated graded R! -module, which is a direct sum of linear strands.
Generally, Lie superalgebras only have a Z/2-grading, but many simple Lie superalgebras,
including the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras, have a Z-grading (not necessarily unique)
which lifts its Z/2-grading. The crucial observation is that for the Littlewood varieties, the
nilpotent Lie superalgebra arising from Koszul duality, which has a natural Z-grading, is a
subalgebra of an orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra with a distinguished Z-grading.
The main result of this paper is that for a large class of modules M over the coordinate
ring of the Littlewood variety, the module M ! consists of one linear strand, and the action
of the nilpotent subalgebra on M ! extends to an action of the entire orthosymplectic Lie
superalgebra and becomes an irreducible representation. The Littlewood variety sits in a
space of matrices, and our class of modules includes all powers of the ideal of maximal minors
in this space of matrices. Furthermore, the modules M have natural geometric constructions.
As a bonus, our results allow us to deduce a Borel–Weil–Bott type theorem for a class of
reducible homogeneous bundles over orthogonal and symplectic Grassmannians.
The use of Koszul duality allows one to transform problems about representations of Lie
superalgebras into problems about modules over complete intersections, where one can use
tools from commutative algebra. We hope that this work will inspire yet further connections.
For some context, we mention that the motivations for this paper come in several forms from
commutative algebra, invariant theory, and representation theory:
(1) The Littlewood varieties were studied in several places under different names (or no name
at all) [H, Ka, L, SSW]. In [SW], we put the Littlewood varieties into a Lie-theoretic
context and show that related free resolutions can be used to recover Littlewood’s formulas for branching rules for classical Lie groups (hence the name) and to deduce new
formulas for the exceptional Lie groups. In [S2] they played a central role in proving the
saturation property for tensor product coefficients for classical groups. So it is reasonable
to look for deeper connections between Littlewood varieties and representation theory.
(2) If we consider the polynomial ring which is the coordinate ring of the space of matrices,
then all powers of the ideal of maximal minors have a linear free resolution ([ABW,
Theorem 5.4]; we give another proof in §2.6). Our results are a perfect analogue in the
setting of complete intersections. See [Ch] for a survey of the behavior of homological
invariants of powers of an ideal (in the general context of a graded Noetherian ring).
(3) The resolution of the ideal of maximal minors is an infinite length generalization of the
classical Eagon–Northcott complex [EN] which has been a rich testing ground and source
of examples in the theory of finite free resolutions [Ei3, N] and its connections with the
theory of degeneracy loci [GLP, Ke, S1].
(4) Techniques exist for constructing free resolutions over complete intersections, but little
is known about minimal free resolutions. The complexes in this paper give a large family
of concrete examples which should form the beginning of a useful case study.
(5) Our results extend work of Akin, Józefiak, Pragacz, Weyman, and the author [AW1,
AW2, AW3, JPW, PW, S3] on realizations of finite-dimensional representations of simple
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
3
Lie superalgebras as syzygies of determinantal ideals. Past results do not cover the
important class of orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras; furthermore, our results deal with
infinite-dimensional irreducible representations. Aside from this, explicit constructions
of representations of Lie superalgebras are generally lacking.
(6) Lovett [L] investigates the problem of calculating the minimal free resolution of the
determinantal ideals in Littlewood varieties, but over the polynomial ring rather than
over the coordinate ring of the Littlewood variety. As our results show, even for the
maximal minors, the answer over the polynomial ring is complicated while the answer
over the complete intersection is dramatically simplified.
1.1. Outline of paper. We now describe the results mentioned above in more detail and
give an outline of the main results of this paper. The background material for this paper is
in §2. There is a good analogy between the results we prove for modules over the coordinate
rings of Littlewood varieties and modules over the coordinate ring of the whole space of
matrices (which is just a polynomial ring). The polynomial case is substantially simpler and
as a warmup, we deduce the analogous results in §2.6 (also they will be used later).
We begin in §3 with the symplectic version of the Littlewood variety. Let V be a symplectic vector space and let E be another vector space with 2 dim(E) ≤ dim(V ). Set
V
V
A = Sym(E ⊗ V ) and B = A/( 2 (E)), where 2 (E) is the space of quadratic invariants under the symplectic group Sp(V ). See Example 3.1.1 for an explicit example with
coordinates. Then Spec(A) is the space of linear maps E → V ∗ and Spec(B) is the subvariety where the image of E in V ∗ is an isotropic subspace. Then B is a complete intersection
and there is an ideal of maximal minors.
The main result (Theorem 3.1.6, Remark 3.3.7) is that all powers of this ideal have a
linear free resolution over B and more generally for a class of modules M. §3.1 contains
basic properties of B, and the connection to orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras. In §3.2,
we describe Howe duality, which is our source of the representations of the orthosymplectic
Lie superalgebra, and prove new results about these representations. We prove the main
result in §3.3 and give applications. First, we calculate the support varieties of the modules
M (Proposition 3.3.9). Second, we use Eisenbud’s construction for free resolutions over
a complete intersection from a free resolution over the polynomial ring [Ei1] to prove an
analogue of the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem for a class of reducible homogeneous bundles on
the symplectic Grassmannian (Theorem 3.3.6). We give examples in §3.5.
Conjecture 3.3.3 gives a hint about further directions into which this story should develop.
In particular, while the representations we get come from a Howe dual pair, the same will
probably not be true for modules associated with lower-order minors. We expect that further
understanding in this direction will lead to deeper insight into the structure of the (derived)
category of representations of orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras. More importantly, this
should lead to an explicit tensor construction of representations, in the same spirit as Schur
functors. We will pursue this in future work.
There are analogues of the above results when V is instead a vector space equipped with
an orthogonal form, which is discussed in §4. There is also a third case where V is vector
space with no extra structure, but one considers pairs of matrices E → V and V → F with
the condition dim(E) + dim(F ) ≤ dim(V ). The locus where the composition E → V → F is
0 is a complete intersection, and analogues of the above results also hold in this case. This is
discussed in §5. The main difference is that the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra is replaced
by the general linear Lie superalgebra.
4
STEVEN V SAM
2. Preliminaries
Throughout the paper, we work over a field k, which we assume is algebraically closed.
To avoid this assumption, it is enough to assume that all semisimple Lie algebras are split
forms. At the beginning of each section we will state our assumptions on char(k) if necessary.
∗
2.1. Notation. Given a vector space V , its dual is denoted
V• V = Homk (V, k). The symmetric, exterior, and divided power algebras are Sym(V ), V (V ), and D(V ), respectively.
n
If V is a vector space with dim(V
(V ). Similarly, if V is a vector
Vn) = n, we set det V =
bundle of rank n, we set det V =
(V).
Given representations V , W of a group G, we write V ≈ W if V has a G-equivariant
filtration whose associated graded is isomorphic to W . We only consider the case when G is
a reductive algebraic group and V and W are graded representations with finite-dimensional
pieces. So when char(k) = 0, we can replace ≈ by ∼
= (isomorphism) by complete reducibility.
If S is a graded algebra, S(−n) is the free S-module with shifted grading: S(−n)i = Si−n .
2.2. Koszul duality. Let R be a Z≥0 -graded k-algebra such that R0 = k and all Ri are
finite-dimensional over k. If k = R/R>0 has a linear free resolution over R, then R is a
Koszul algebra [BGS, Definition 1.2.1]. Let W be the kernel of the multiplication map R1 ⊗
R1 → R2 . Let W ⊥ be the annihilator of W in R1∗ ⊗ R1∗ and define R! = T(R1∗ )/(W ⊥ ) where
T(R1∗ ) is the tensor algebra on R1∗ . Then R! is the Koszul dual of R and is also a Koszul
algebra [BGS, Proposition 2.9.1] (and (R! )! = R). Furthermore, we have an isomorphism of
algebras
R! ∼
(2.2.1)
= Ext• (k, k)op
R
where the right hand side is equipped with the usual Yoneda product [BGS, Theorem 2.10.1]
and the superscript op means we take the opposite ring. Write E = Ext•R (k, k).
Let M be a graded right R-module such that dimk Mi < ∞ for all i. A linear cochain complex β(M) is constructed in [BEH, p.105] consisting of free right E-modules with β(M)j =
Mj ⊗k E(j). Via (2.2.1), this is also a cochain complex of free left R! -modules. If M is a
∗
graded left R-module, then M ∨ is a graded right R-module with Mi∨ = M−i
, and we define
∨
!
L(M) = β(M ), which we think of as a chain complex of graded free left R -modules:
d
d
1
0
∗
L(M) : · · · → Mi∗ ⊗ R! (−i) → · · · → M1∗ ⊗ R! (−1) −
→
M0∗ ⊗ R! −
→
M−1
⊗ R! (1) → · · · .
∗
Chasing through the construction, we see that for any i, the map Mi∗ → Mi−1
⊗ R1! is dual to
the multiplication map R1 ⊗Mi−1 → Mi . In particular, we can recover M (functorially) from
L(M) under this finiteness assumption, and so L is an equivalence. Let R be its inverse.
We record the above discussion in the next theorem, which is a standard result.
Theorem 2.2.2. Let M be a finitely generated graded R-module. Pick n minimal so that
∗
Mn 6= 0 and set N = coker(Mn+1
⊗ R! (−n − 1) → Mn∗ ⊗ R! (−n)).
(a) The functor L is an equivalence from the category of graded left R-modules with finitedimensional graded pieces to linear complexes of graded finite rank free left R! -modules.
(b) For integers i ≥ 0 and k, we have
Hk (L(M))i+k ∼
= (TorR (k, M)i+k )∗ .
i
(c) L(M) is a subcomplex of the minimal free resolution of N if and only if M is generated
in degree n.
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
5
(d) L(M) is the first linear strand of the minimal free resolution of N if and only if M is
generated in degree n and is defined by linear relations over R.
(e) L(M) is the minimal free resolution of N if and only if M is generated in degree n and
has a linear free resolution over R.
Proof. (a) follows from the discussion above. For (b), we have
∗
Hk (L(M))i+k = H−k (β(M ∨ ))i+k = ExtiR (k, M ∨ )−i−k = (TorR
i (k, M)i+k ) ,
where the first equality is by definition of L, the second is on [BEH, p.106], and the third
follows from the fact that HomR (k, (−)∨ ) ∼
= (k⊗−)∗ are isomorphic functors when restricted
to finitely generated R-modules. One can prove (c), (d), (e) using (b) by following the
arguments in [Ei3, Proof of Theorem 7.7].
We end this section with the families of Koszul algebras studied in this paper.
Let V be a vector space. Let R = Sym(V )/(f1 , . . . , fr ) be a complete intersection where
each fi is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 2. Define g1 = V ∗ and let g2 be the dual
space of hf1 , . . . , fr i with dual basis f1∗ , . . . , fr∗ . Each fi is a quadratic form on V ∗ ; let βi
be its symmetric
bilinear form. Define a Lie superbracket on g = g1 ⊕ g2 by [v + w, v ′ +
P
r
w ′ ] = Pi=1 βi (v, v ′ )fi∗ ∈ g2 for v, v ′ ∈ g1 and w, w ′ ∈ g2 . Define a squaring operation
r
∗
v [2] =
i=1 fi (v)fi for v ∈ g1 (this is only needed when char(k) = 2). The universal
enveloping algebra U(g) is the tensor algebra on g modulo the relations
(a) x ⊗ y − (−1)deg(x) deg(y) y ⊗ x = [x, y] for homogeneous x, y ∈ g, and
(b) x ⊗ x = x[2] for x ∈ g1 .
The bracket and squaring operations preserve the grading on g, so U(g) is a graded algebra.
The
V• PBW theorem [CW, Theorem 1.32] implies that U(g) admits a flat degeneration to
(g1 ) ⊗k Sym(g2 ). In particular, U(g) is a Noetherian k-algebra.
Proposition 2.2.3. Keep the notation above.
(a) R is a Koszul algebra, and R! = U(g).
(a) Let M be a finitely generated R-module and let G be a linear strand of the minimal free
resolution of M over R. Then R(G) is a finitely generated U(g)-module.
Proof. (a) follows from [Av, Example 10.2.3].
R
∗
(b) The algebra U(g) ∼
= Ext•R (k, k) acts on Ext•R (M, k) = Tor
L• (M, k) via the Yoneda
product, and this can be identified with the action of U(g) on
R(G) where the sum is
over all linear strands of the minimal free resolution of M (see for example, [BEH, p.106]).
By [Av, Theorem 9.1.4] (and the fact that Sym(V ) has finite projective dimension [Ei3,
Theorem 1.1]), the Ext•R (k, k)-module Ext•R (M, k) is finitely generated.
2.3. Partitions and Schur functors. A sequence of integers λ = (λ1 , .P
. . , λn ) with λ1 ≥
· · · ≥ λn ≥ 0 is a partition. We write ℓ(λ) = max{i | λi 6= 0} and |λ| = i λi . If i > ℓ(λ),
we use the convention that λi = 0.
The sum of two partitions is defined by (λ + µ)i = λi + µi . The exponential notation (ab )
denotes the number a repeated b times. Its Young diagram is a rectangle, so we also denote
this by b × a. We say that λ ⊆ µ if λi ≤ µi for all i. If λ ⊆ b × a, then (b × a) \ λ refers
to the partition (a − λb , . . . , a − λ1 ), i.e., we have rotated the Young diagram of λ by 180
degrees and removed it from the bottom-right corner of the b × a rectangle.
The transpose partition λ† is defined by λ†i = #{j | λj ≥ i}. This is best explained in
terms of Young diagrams, which we define via an example.
6
STEVEN V SAM
Example 2.3.1. If λ = (5, 3, 2), then λ† = (3, 3, 2, 1, 1):
λ=
λ† =
,
.
So ℓ(5, 3, 2) = 3 and |(5, 3, 2)| = 10. We have λ = (3 × 5) \ (3, 2).
Let λ be a partition. Then we can define the Schur functor Sλ (this is Lλ′ in [Wey,
§2.1]). For any vector space E, Sλ (E) is a representation of the general linear group GL(E)
and Sλ (E) 6= 0 if and only if ℓ(λ) ≤ n. When char(k) = 0, each Sλ (E) is an irreducible
representation of GL(E). If E is a vector bundle, then SV
λ (E) is a vector bundle.
If dim(E) = n and λ = (1n ), then S(1n ) (E) = det E = n (E). Furthermore, Sλ+(1n ) (E) =
Sλ (E) ⊗ (det E). Using this, we can define Sλ (E) for any weakly decreasing sequence λ
of integers of length n: find N such that λ + (1N ) is nonnegative, and define Sλ (E) =
Sλ+(1N ) (E) ⊗ (det E ∗ )N . This does not depend on the choice of N.
Theorem 2.3.2. Given partitions λ, µ, ν, let cνλ,µ be the Littlewood–Richardson coefficient
(see [M, §9] for details, but we will not need the precise formulation). Then
M
ν
Sλ (V ) ⊗ Sµ (V ) ≈
Sν (V )⊕cλ,µ .
ν
If
cνλ,µ
6= 0, then |ν| = |λ| + |µ|, λ ⊆ ν, µ ⊆ ν, ν1 ≤ λ1 + µ1 , and ℓ(ν) ≤ ℓ(λ) + ℓ(µ).
Proof. For the ≈, see [Bo]. The last statement is an easy consequence of [M, §9].
Theorem 2.3.3 (Cauchy identities). Given vector spaces V and W , we have
M
M
Vn
Symn (V ⊗ W ) ≈
Sλ (V ) ⊗ Sλ (W ),
(V ⊗ W ) ≈
Sλ (V ) ⊗ Sλ† (W ).
|λ|=n
|λ|=n
Proof. See [Wey, Theorem 2.3.2].
Finally, let V be a symplectic or orthogonal space, i.e., a vector space equipped with a
symplectic or orthogonal form. Let λ be a partition with 2ℓ(λ) ≤ dim(V ). We can define
S[λ] (V ), which is a representation of either the symplectic group Sp(V ) or orthogonal group
O(V ), respectively. If V is orthogonal and 2ℓ(λ) = dim(V ), then S[λ] (V ) decomposes, as a
representation of SO(V ), into the sum of two non-isomorphic representations which we call
S[λ]+ (V ) and S[λ]− (V ). When char(k) = 0, Sλ (V ) is an irreducible representation of O(V ),
and S[λ]± (V ) are irreducible representations of SO(V ). In all other cases, the representation
S[λ] (V ) is irreducible when char(k) = 0. We refer the reader to [FH, §§17.3, 19.5] for details
when char(k) = 0 and to [SW, §2] for definitions and basic properties in the general case.
2.4. Geometric technique for free resolutions. Let X be a projective variety. Let
0→ξ→ε→η→0
be an exact sequence of vector bundles on X, with ε trivial, and let V be another vector
bundle on X. Put
A = H0 (X; Sym(ε)) = Sym(H0 (X; ε)),
M (i) (V) = Hi (X; Sym(η) ⊗ V).
Then each M (i) (V) is an A-module. For the following, see [Wey, §5.1].
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
7
Theorem 2.4.1. There is a minimal graded A-free complex F• with terms
M
V
Fi =
Hj (X; i+j (ξ) ⊗ V) ⊗ A(−i − j)
j≥0
with the property that for all i ≥ 0, we have H−i (F• ) = M (i) (V) and Hj (F• ) = 0 for j > 0.
In particular, Fi = 0 for all i < 0 if and only if M (j) (V) = 0 for all j > 0. In this case,
F• is a minimal free resolution of M (0) (V).
2.5. Borel–Weil theorem. Let Gr(n, V ) be the Grassmannian of n-dimensional subspaces
of a vector space V . There is a tautological sequence of vector bundles on Gr(n, V )
0 → R → V ⊗ OGr(n,V ) → Q → 0,
where R = {(v, W ) ∈ V × Gr(n, V ) | v ∈ W } has rank n.
Theorem 2.5.1 (Borel–Weil, Kempf). Let λ, µ be weakly decreasing sequences of integers
of lengths n and dim(V ) − n, and let V be the vector bundle Sλ (R∗ ) ⊗ Sµ (Q∗ ) on Gr(n, V ).
Set β = (λ1 , . . . , λn , µ1 , µ2 , . . . ).
• If β is weakly decreasing, then H0 (Gr(n, V ); V) = Sβ (V ∗ ) as GL(V )-representations,
and all higher cohomology of V vanishes.
• Suppose λ1 = · · · = λn = k for some k and that k + 1 ≤ µ1 ≤ k + n. Then all
cohomology of V vanishes.
Proof. Let π : Flag(V ) → Gr(n, V ) be the projection of the full flag variety on V to
Gr(n, V ). Then V = π∗ L for a line bundle L such that Ri π∗ L = 0 for i > 0 (see [Wey,
Theorem 4.1.12]). So we can reduce the first statement to a statement about cohomology of
L on Flag(V ), and this is contained in [Ja, §II.4].
For the second statement, let Yi be the partial flag variety of flags of subspaces of dimensions i, i + 1, . . . , dim(V ) − 1. Name the projections f : Flag(V ) → Yn , g : Yn → Gr(n, V ),
and h : Yn → Yn+1 . Set L′ = f∗ L. Since λ1 = · · · = λn , L is fiberwise trivial along f . The
fibers of f are connected, so L′ is a line bundle. The fibers of h are isomorphic to Pn and the
restriction of L′ to each Pn is isomorphic to O(k − µ1 ). By assumption, 0 > k − µ1 ≥ −n,
so the cohomology is fiberwise trivial and hence globally trivial. So Ri h∗ L′ = 0 for all i. In
particular, Hi (Yn ; L′) = 0 for all i. Since π = gf , we see that g∗ L′ = V, and that Ri g∗ L′ = 0
for i > 0. We conclude that Hi (Gr(n, V ); V) = 0 for all i.
Remark 2.5.2. The Grassmannian of n-dimensional subspaces of V and the Grassmannian
of n-dimensional quotient spaces of V ∗ are naturally isomorphic. So in Theorem 2.5.1, we
could replace R∗ and Q∗ by Q and R, respectively, and use Sβ (V ) instead of Sβ (V ∗ ).
Let Flag(n, n + d, V ) be the subvariety of Gr(n, V ) × Gr(n + d, V ) consisting of pairs of
subspaces (W, W ′ ) such that W ⊂ W ′ . Let Rn ⊂ Rn+d be the corresponding tautological
subbundles restricted to Flag(n, n + d, V ).
Theorem 2.5.3 (Borel–Weil, Kempf). Let λ, µ, ν be weakly decreasing sequences of integers of lengths n, d, dim(V ) − n − d, respectively. Let V be the vector bundle Sλ (R∗n ) ⊗
Sµ ((Rn+d /Rn )∗ ) ⊗ Sν ((V /Rn+d )∗ ) on Flag(n, n + d, V ).
If β = (λ, µ, ν) is a weakly decreasing sequence, then H0 (Flag(n, n + d, V ); V) = Sβ (V ∗ )
as GL(V )-representations, and all higher cohomology of V vanishes.
Proof. See proof of Theorem 2.5.1.
8
STEVEN V SAM
Now let V be a vector space of dimension 2n with symplectic form ωV . For d ≤ n,
IGr(d, V ) is the subvariety of Gr(d, V ) consisting of isotropic subspaces W (i.e., ωV |W ≡ 0).
Let R be the tautological subbundle on Gr(d, V ) restricted to IGr(d, V ).
Theorem 2.5.4 (Borel–Weil, Kempf). Let λ be a partition with ℓ(λ) ≤ d. As representations
of Sp(V ), H0 (IGr(d, V ); Sλ (R∗ )) = S[λ] (V ) and all higher cohomology of Sλ (R∗ ) vanishes.
Proof. See [SW, (2.1)].
Now let V be a vector space of dimension 2n or 2n + 1 with orthogonal form ωV (if
char(k) = 2, we need a quadratic form, but the details remain unchanged). For d ≤ n,
OGr(d, V ) is the subvariety of Gr(d, V ) of isotropic subspaces W (i.e., ωV |W ≡ 0). Let R
be the tautological subbundle on Gr(d, V ) restricted to OGr(d, V ). When dim(V ) = 2n
and d = n, OGr(d, V ) has two connected components, which are isomorphic to one another.
Theorem 2.5.5 (Borel–Weil, Kempf). Let λ be a partition with ℓ(λ) ≤ d. As representations
of O(V ), H0 (OGr(d, V ); Sλ (R∗ )) = S[λ] (V ) and all higher cohomology of Sλ (R∗ ) vanishes.
Proof. See [SW, (2.6)] for dim(V ) odd; the even-dimensional case is similar.
Remark 2.5.6. The results in this section are functorial in V . So we can replace V by a
vector bundle π : V → Z on a scheme Z, and then Gr(n, V ), IGr(n, V ), etc. are replaced
by a relative construction, and cohomology is replaced with higher direct images.
2.6. Determinantal modules. In this section, we construct a family of equivariant modules with a linear free resolution over the coordinate ring of a space of matrices, and derive
their basic properties. The modules considered later are generalizations of them.
Let E and F be vector spaces of dimensions n and n + d, respectively (d ≥ 0). Let
X = Gr(d, F ) be the Grassmannian with tautological sub- and quotient bundles R and Q.
In the notation of §2.4, set η = E ⊗ Q and ε = E ⊗ F ⊗ OX . Given a partition ν with
ℓ(ν) ≤ d, and given k ≥ ν1 , define
Vνk = (det E)k ⊗ (det Q)k ⊗ Sν R.
Proposition 2.6.1. The higher cohomology of Sym(η) ⊗ Vνk vanishes.
Proof. By Theorem 2.3.3, Sym(η) has a filtration by terms of the form Sλ (E) ⊗ Sλ (Q). Then
the weight of Sλ (Q) ⊗Vνk is (k + λ1, . . . , k + λn , ν1 , . . . , νd ), which is weakly decreasing. Hence
all higher cohomology vanishes by Theorem 2.5.1 and Remark 2.5.2.
Define the A = Sym(E ⊗ F )-module
(2.6.2)
k
Mνk (E, F ) = H0 (X; Sym(η) ⊗ V(d×k)\ν
)
M
≈
S(k+λ1 ,...,k+λn ) (E) ⊗ S(k+λ1 ,...,k+λn ,k−νd ,...,k−ν1 ) (F ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
To prove the ≈, use Theorem 2.5.1 and Remark 2.5.2. The annihilator of this module is 0.
k
Note that we have used V(d×k)\ν
rather than Vνk .
Still in the notation of §2.4, we have ξ = E ⊗R, so by Theorem 2.4.1 and Proposition 2.6.1,
the terms of the minimal free resolution of Mνk (E, F ) are
M
V
(2.6.3) Fνi =
Hj (X; i+j (E ⊗ R) ⊗ (det E)k ⊗ S(d×k)\ν (R) ⊗ (det Q)k ) ⊗ A(−i − j).
j≥0
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
9
Proposition 2.6.4. The resolution of Mνk (E, F ) is linear. More precisely,
M
⊕cα
(S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ S(kn ,α) (F )) λ† ,(d×k)\ν ⊗ A(−i).
Fνi ≈
|λ|=i
λ⊆n×d
α⊆d×k
Proof. Consider (2.6.3). Using Theorem 2.3.3, we have
M
Vi+j
(E ⊗ R) ≈
Sλ (E) ⊗ Sλ† (R),
|λ|=i+j
λ⊆n×d
so we have to show that Sλ† (R) ⊗ S(d×k)\ν (R) ⊗ (det Q)k has no higher cohomology when
λ ⊆ n × d. Let Sα (R) be a term appearing in the filtration of Sλ† (R) ⊗ S(d×k)\ν (R) in
Theorem 2.3.2 (so with multiplicity cαλ† ,(d×k)\ν ). By assumption, λ†1 ≤ n, so Theorem 2.3.2
implies that α1 ≤ k + n. To calculate the cohomology of Sα (R) ⊗ (det Q)k , we consider
the sequence (k, . . . , k, α1 , . . . , αd ) and use Theorem 2.5.1 and Remark 2.5.2: if k ≥ α1 ,
then H0 (X; Sα (R) ⊗ (det Q)k ) = S(kn ,α) (F ) and there is no higher cohomology; otherwise,
k + 1 ≤ α1 ≤ k + n, and all cohomology vanishes.
Remark 2.6.5. If ν = (k d ), then M(kk d ) (E, F ) is the kth power of the maximal minors of
(k d )
the generic matrix E ⊗ A(−1) → F ∗ ⊗ A. When k < n and char(k) = 0, F• is also the
kth linear strand of the ideal of minors of order n − k + 1 in A [Wey, Proposition 6.1.3].
2.7. Modification rules. In this section, fix a nonnegative integer k.
C
2.7.1. Type C. We associate to a partition λ two quantities, ιC
2k (λ) and τ2k (λ). If ℓ(λ) ≤ k
C
we put ιC
2k (λ) = 0 and τ2k (λ) = λ. Suppose ℓ(λ) > k. A border strip is a connected
skew Young diagram containing no 2 × 2 square. Let Rλ be the connected border strip of
length 2ℓ(λ) − 2k − 2 which starts at the first box in the final row of λ, if it exists. If Rλ
C
exists, is non-empty and λ \ Rλ is a partition, then we put ιC
2k (λ) = c(Rλ ) + ι2k (λ \ Rλ )
C
C
and τ2k
(λ) = τ2k
(λ \ Rλ ), where c(Rλ ) denotes the number of columns that Rλ occupies;
C
otherwise we put ιC
2k (λ) = ∞ and leave τ2k (λ) undefined.
Example 2.7.1. Set k = 1 and λ = (6, 5, 5, 3, 2, 1, 1). Then 2ℓ(λ) − 2k − 2 = 10. We shade
in the border strip Rλ of length 10 in the Young diagram of λ:
In this case c(Rλ ) = 5. If k = 2, then λ \ Rλ is not a partition, so τ4C (λ) is undefined.
More details and references can be found in [SSW, §3.5].
D
2.7.2. Type D. We associate to a partition λ two quantities ιD
2k (λ) and τ2k (λ). Details and
references can be found in [SSW, §4.4]. The definition is the same as the one given in §2.7.1,
D
(λ)) ≤ k):
except for two differences (here, as opposed to [SSW, §4.4], we require ℓ(τ2k
• the border strip Rλ has length 2ℓ(λ) − 2k,
• in the definition of ι2k (λ), we use c(Rλ ) − 1 instead of c(Rλ ).
10
STEVEN V SAM
∆
2.7.3. Spin rule. We associate to a partition λ two quantities ι∆
2k (λ) and τ2k (λ). Details and
references can be found in [SS]. The definition is the same as the one given in §2.7.1, except
that the border strip Rλ has length 2ℓ(λ) − 2k − 1.
′
2.7.4. Type A. We associate to a pair of partitions (λ, λ′ ) two quantities, ιA
k (λ, λ ) and
τkA (λ, λ′). Details and references can be found in [SSW, §5.4].
′
A
′
′
If ℓ(λ) + ℓ(λ′ ) ≤ k, then ιA
k (λ, λ ) = 0 and τk (λ, λ ) = (λ, λ ). Assume now that ℓ(λ) +
ℓ(λ′ ) > k. Let Rλ and Rλ′ be the border strips of length ℓ(λ) + ℓ(λ′ ) − k − 1 starting in the
first box of the final row of λ and λ′ , respectively, if they exist. If both Rλ and Rλ′ exist and
are non-empty and both λ \ Rλ and λ′ \ Rλ′ are partitions, define
′
′
ιA
k (λ, λ ) = c(Rλ ) + c(Rλ′ ) − 1 + ιk (λ \ Rλ , λ \ Rλ′ )
and τkA (λ, λ′) = τkA (λ \ Rλ , λ′ \ Rλ′ ). Otherwise, set ιk (λ, λ′ ) = ∞ and leave τkA (λ, λ′ )
undefined.
2.8. Lie superalgebra homology. For background on Lie superalgebras, see [CW, §1.1].
Let g be a Lie superalgebra with universal enveloping algebra U(g), and let M be a g-module.
U(g)
Define Hi (g; M) = Tori (M, k). Given an ideal h ⊂ g, each Hq (h; M) is annihilated by h,
and we have the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence
(2.8.1)
E2p,q = Hp (g/h; Hq (h; M)) ⇒ Hp+q (g; M).
When g is a Lie algebra, this is stated in [Wei, §7.5]. It is a special case of the Grothendieck
spectral sequence for the derived functors of a composition of two right-exact functors [Wei,
§5.8], so it easily extends to Lie superalgebras.
We now state some calculations of Lie superalgebra homology that will be used.
Let E|F denote a superspace with even part E and odd part F . Set n = dim(E) and m =
dim(F ). Let gl(n|m) ∼
= gl(E|F ) = (E|F ) ⊗ (E|F )∗ be the general linear Lie superalgebra. It
∗
has an Abelian subalgebra
V• u = ∗E ⊗ F , which is the space of strictly upper-triangular block
matrices. So U(u) =
(E ⊗ F ).
Given a partition λ, we can define Sλ (E|F ) (see [Wey, §2.4] where Lλ′ is used in place
of Sλ ), which is a representation of gl(E|F ). This is isomorphic to Sλ† (F |E) and it is
nonzero if and only if λn+1 ≤ m. We are interested in the homology groups Hi (u; Sλ (E|F )),
which are naturally representations of gl(E) × gl(F ). Let ρ = (−1, −2, −3, . . . ). Given a
permutation w, set w • λ† = w(λ† + ρ) − ρ. Let W P be the set of finite permutations such
that w • λ† = (β1 , . . . , βm , γ1, γ2 , . . . ) where β is weakly decreasing and γ is a partition. Set
ℓ(w) = #{i < j | w(i) > w(j)}.
Proposition 2.8.2. Assume char(k) = 0. With the notation above, we have
M
Hi (E ⊗ F ∗ ; Sλ (E|F )) =
Sβ (F ) ⊗ Sγ † (E).
w∈W P
ℓ(w)=i
w•λ† =(β,γ)
In particular, setting µ = (λ†m+1 , λ†m+2 , . . . ), we get
H0 (E ⊗ F ∗ ; Sλ (E|F )) = S(λ† ,...,λ†m ) (F ) ⊗ Sµ† (E),
1
H1 (E ⊗ F ∗ ; Sλ (E|F )) = S(λ† ,...,λ† ,µ1 −1) (F ) ⊗ S(λ†m +1,µ2 ,µ3 ,... )† (E),
1
m−1
V•
so Sλ (E|F ) has a linear presentation as a
(E ⊗ F ∗ )-module if and only if λ†m = λ†m+1 .
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
Proof. See [CKL, Corollary 5.1].
11
Now let V be a symplectic or orthogonal space. Let F ⊂ V be a maximal isotropic
subspace. The choice of F gives a nilpotent subalgebra n as follows:
).
• If V is symplectic, n = Sym2 (F ) ⊂ Sym2 (F ⊕ F ∗ ) ∼
= sp(V
V
V
• If V is orthogonal and dim(V ) is even, n = 2 (F ) ⊂ 2 (F ⊕ F ∗ ) ∼
= so(V ).
V2
V2
• If V is orthogonal and dim(V ) is odd, n = F ⊕ (F ) ⊂
(F ⊕ F ∗ ⊕ k) ∼
= so(V ).
Recall the representations S[λ] (V ) discussed in §2.3.
Proposition 2.8.3. Assume char(k) = 0. Pick a partition with ℓ(λ) ≤ n = ⌊dim(V )/2⌋.
• If V is orthogonal, dim(V ) is even, and ℓ(λ) = n, then we have gl(F )-equivariant
isomorphisms
H0 (n; S[λ]+ (V )) = Sλ (F ∗ ),
H0 (n; S[λ]− (V )) = S(λ1 ,...,λn−1 ,−λn ) (F ∗ ).
• Otherwise, we have a gl(F )-equivariant isomorphism
H0 (n; S[λ] (V )) = Sλ (F ∗ ).
So a finite-dimensional sp(V )- or so(V )-module M is determined by the gl(F )-module H0 (n; M).
Proof. The H0 calculations are a consequence of the fact that a Cartan subalgebra of gl(F )
is also a Cartan subalgebra for sp(V ) or so(V ), respectively. The last statement follows from
the fact that finite-dimensional representations of sp(V ) or so(V ) are semisimple.
Let V be a vector space with a decomposition V = A⊕B with dim(A) = a and dim(B) = b.
This defines a nilpotent subalgebra n = B ∗ ⊗ A ⊂ gl(V ).
Proposition 2.8.4. Assume char(k) = 0. Let λ = (λ1 , . . . , λa+b ) be a weakly decreasing
sequence of integers. Then
H0 (B ∗ ⊗ A; Sλ (V )) = S(λ1 ,...,λb ) (B) ⊗ S(λb+1 ,...,λa+b ) (A).
So a finite-dimensional gl(V )-module M is determined by the gl(A)×gl(B)-module H0 (n; M).
3. Symplectic Littlewood varieties
C
In this section, we use τ2k and ι2k to denote τ2k
and ιC
2k (see §2.7.1).
3.1. Preliminaries. Let E be a vector space of dimension n and let V be a symplectic
space of dimension 2n + 2d (we assume d ≥ 0; some of the results below hold even if d < 0,
but we will not need them). Let A = Sym(E ⊗ V ). Using the symplectic form, we have a
GL(E) × Sp(V )-equivariant inclusion
V2
V
V
(E) ⊂ 2 (E) ⊗ 2 (V ) ⊂ Sym2 (E ⊗ V ).
V
V
Let B = A/( 2 (E)) be the quotient of A by the ideal generated by 2 (E).
Example 3.1.1. Let n = 3 and d = 0, and pick bases for E and V . We think of the
coordinates in A as the elements in a 3 × 6 matrix:
x1,1 x1,2 x1,3 x1,4 x1,5 x1,6
x2,1 x2,2 x2,3 x2,4 x2,5 x2,6
x3,1 x3,2 x3,3 x3,4 x3,5 x3,6
12
STEVEN V SAM
If the symplectic form on V is given by ωV (v, w) = v1 w2 − v2 w1 + v3 w4 − v4 w3 + v5 w6 − v6 w5 ,
V
then 2 (E) is spanned by the 3 equations
x1,1 x2,2 − x1,2 x2,1 + x1,3 x2,4 − x1,4 x2,3 + x1,5 x2,6 − x1,6 x2,5 ,
x1,1 x3,2 − x1,2 x3,1 + x1,3 x3,4 − x1,4 x3,3 + x1,5 x3,6 − x1,6 x3,5 ,
x2,1 x3,2 − x2,2 x3,1 + x2,3 x3,4 − x2,4 x3,3 + x2,5 x3,6 − x2,6 x3,5 .
We have Spec(A) = Hom(E, V ∗ ), the space of linear maps E → V ∗ . We can identify
ϕ
ϕ∗
Spec(B) ⊂ Hom(E, V ∗ ) with the set of maps ϕ such that the composition E −
→V∗ ∼
= V −→
E ∗ is 0 (here V ∼
= V ∗ is the isomorphism induced by the symplectic form on V ). Equivalently,
Spec(B) is the subvariety of maps E → V ∗ such that the image of E is isotropic, i.e., the
symplectic form restricts to the 0 form on it.
V
Proposition 3.1.2. (a) B is an integral domain, i.e., the ideal generated by 2 (E) is prime.
(b) As a representation of GL(E) × Sp(V ), we have
M
B≈
Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ] (V ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
(c) Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ] (V ) is in the ideal generated by Sµ (E) ⊗ S[µ] (V ) if and only if λ ⊇ µ.
(d) Two closed points in Spec(B) are in the same GL(E) × Sp(V ) orbit if and only if they
have the same rank as a matrix. Each orbit closure is a normal variety with rational
singularities.
V In particular, they are Cohen–Macaulay varieties.
(e) The ideal ( 2 (E)) is generated by a regular sequence. In particular, B is a complete
intersection and is a Koszul algebra.
Proof. For (a), (b), (d), and (e), see [SW, Theorem 2.2]. (c) follows from the analogous
statement for Sym(E ⊗ V ) [DEP, Corollary 4.2].
Remark 3.1.3. Part (e) of Proposition 3.1.2 also holds if dim(V ) = 2 dim(E)−2. Essentially
the same proof as for [SW, Theorem 2.2(3)] works.
Let IGr(n + d, V ) be the isotropic Grassmannian of rank n + d isotropic subspaces of
V with tautological subbundle R. Let ν ⊆ (k d ) be a partition. Using (2.6.2) in a relative
situation, we get a Sym(E ⊗ R∗ )-module Mνk (E, R∗ ).
Proposition 3.1.4. The higher sheaf cohomology groups of Mνk (E, R∗ ) vanish and
M
H0 (IGr(n + d, V ); Mνk (E, R∗ )) ≈
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ S[(kn )+λ,k−νd ,...,k−ν1] (V ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
Proof. By (2.6.2), we have
Mνk (E, R∗ ) ≈
M
S(k+λ1 ,...,k+λn ) (E) ⊗ S(k+λ1 ,...,k+λn ,k−νd ,...,k−ν1 ) (R∗ ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
Now the result follows from Theorem 2.5.4.
We define
(3.1.5)
Mkν = H0 (IGr(n + d, V ); Mνk (E, R∗ ))
M
≈
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ S[((kn )+λ,k−νd ,...,k−ν1)] (V ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
13
So Mkν is an A-module. In fact, the scheme-theoretic image of Spec(Sym(E ⊗ R∗ )) →
Spec(A) is Spec(B) (this is clear set-theoretically, and then use that both Spec(Sym(E⊗R∗ ))
and Spec(B) are reduced schemes), so Mkν is also a B-module.
The following result is the symplectic version of the main result of this paper. A more
detailed version of this theorem is contained in Theorem 3.3.2, which will be proven in §3.3.
Theorem 3.1.6. Assume char(k) = 0. The minimal free resolution of Mkν over B is linear.
Let Ve be a Z/2-graded space (from now on, superspace) with Ve0 = E ⊕ E ∗ and Ve1 = V .
Define a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form on E ⊕E ∗ by h(e, ϕ), (e′ , ϕ′)i = ϕ′ (e)+ϕ(e′ ).
Then Ve has a supersymmetric bilinear form by taking the direct sum of the orthogonal form
on E⊕E ∗ and the symplectic form on V . Let osp(Ve ) be the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra
in gl(Ve ) compatible with this form. See [CW, §1.1.3] for more details on supersymmetric
forms and orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras. We have a Z-grading on osp(Ve ) supported on
[−2, 2] (we use the symbol ⊕ to separate the different pieces of this grading):
V2
V
(E) ⊕ (E ⊗ V ) ⊕ (gl(E) × sp(V )) ⊕ (E ∗ ⊗ V ∗ ) ⊕ 2 (E ∗ ).
Let g be the positive part of this grading, i.e.,
g = (E ∗ ⊗ V ∗ ) ⊕
V2
(E ∗ ).
V
Then 2 (E ∗ ) is central in g. For e⊗v, e′ ⊗v ′ ∈ E ∗ ⊗V ∗ , we have [e⊗v, e′ ⊗v ′ ] = ωV (v, v ′)e∧e′
where ωV is the symplectic form on V ∗ ∼
= V . So Proposition 2.2.3 implies the following:
Proposition 3.1.7. The Koszul dual of B is the universal enveloping algebra U(g).
V
Let F ⊂ V be a maximal isotropic subspace and write V = F ⊕ F ∗ . Let u = 2 (E ∗ |F ) ⊂
osp(Ve ). It inherits a Z-grading:
V
u0 = Sym2 (F ), u1 = E ∗ ⊗ F, u2 = 2 (E ∗ ).
Let g′ ⊂ osp(Ve ) be the subalgebra generated by u and g. Then it also has a Z-grading:
V
g′0 = Sym2 (F ), g′1 = E ∗ ⊗ V ∗ , g′2 = 2 (E ∗ ).
Lemma 3.1.8. We have the following two exact sequences of Lie superalgebras
(3.1.8.1)
0 → g → g′ → Sym2 (F ) → 0,
(3.1.8.2)
0 → u → g′ → E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ → 0.
Proof. For (3.1.8.1), it follows from the Z-grading that g is an ideal in g′ . The same reasoning
almost works for (3.1.8.2), but we also have to note that [Sym2 (F ), E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ ] = E ∗ ⊗ F .
3.2. Howe duality. In this section, we assume that char(k) = 0.
Let U be a 2k-dimensional symplectic space. Then U ⊗ Ve is a superspace with even part
U ⊗(E ⊕E ∗ ) and odd part U ⊗V and has a super skew-symmetric bilinear form by taking the
tensor product of the forms on U and Ve . Let spo(U ⊗ Ve ) be the associated orthosymplectic
Lie superalgebra (we use spo instead of osp since our form is super skew-symmetric).
Let E ∗ |F denote the superspace with even part E ∗ and odd part F . Then U ⊗ (E ∗ |F ) is
a maximal isotropic subspace of U ⊗ Ve and hence we get an oscillator representation
U = Sym(U ⊗ (E ∗ |F ))
14
STEVEN V SAM
of spo(U ⊗ Ve ). Both sp(U) and osp(Ve ) are subalgebras of spo(U ⊗ Ve ) which commute with
one another, so sp(U) × osp(Ve ) acts on U . As a representation of sp(U), U is a direct sum
of finite-dimensional representations, so we can use the group Sp(U) instead.
For a partition λ with ℓ(λ) ≤ k and λn+1 ≤ n + d, let Nλk denote the S[λ] (U)-isotypic
component of U under the action of Sp(U). We need some of the following facts about the
action of Sp(U) × osp(Ve ), which state that they form a Howe dual pair (we will not use
unitarizability, and hence do not define it; we state it only for completeness):
Theorem 3.2.1. For a partition λ with ℓ(λ) ≤ k and λn+1 ≤ n + d, Nλk is an irreducible,
unitarizable, lowest-weight representation of osp(Ve ). We have Nλk ∼
= Nλk′ if and only if
λ = λ′ . As a representation of Sp(U) × osp(Ve ), we have a direct sum decomposition
M
S[λ] (U) ⊗ Nλk .
U = Sym(U ⊗ (E ∗ |F )) =
ℓ(λ)≤k
λn+1 ≤n+d
Proof. See [CW, §§5.3.1, 5.3.2].
Theorem 3.2.2. We have a gl(E) × gl(F )-equivariant isomorphism
M
U(u)
Sα (E ∗ |F ) ⊗ (det E ∗ )k ⊗ (det F ∗ )k .
Hi (u; Nλk ) = Tori (Nλk , k) ∼
=
α
τ2k (α)=λ
ι2k (α)=i
Proof. This follows from [CKW, Theorem 5.7]. Their notation does not match ours, so
alternatively one can use [SSW, §3] by noting that [SSW, Corollary 3.16] is valid whenever
E is an object in a semisimple monoidal Abelian category. In particular, we can take E to
be E ∗ |F in the category of polynomial representations of gl(E ∗ |F ). We note that the twist
by (det E ∗ )k ⊗ (det F ∗ )k is not present in [SSW] because it did not consider the action of u
as being restricted from a larger Lie (super)algebra which forces the twist present here.
Proposition 3.2.3. Let λ be a partition with ℓ(λ) ≤ k and λn+1 ≤ n + d. Set ν =
(λ†1 , . . . , λ†n+d ) and µ = (λ†n+d+1 , λ†n+d+2 , . . . ). Then
H0 (g; Nλk ) = (det E ∗ )k ⊗ Sµ† (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[((n+d)×k)\ν] (V )
H1 (g; Nλk ) = (det E ∗ )k ⊗ S(1+νn+d ,µ2 ,µ3 ,... )† (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[(k−µ1 +1,k−νn+d−1,...,k−ν1)] (V ).
In particular, as a U(g)-module, Nλk is generated in a single degree and has relations of
degree λ†n+d − λ†n+d+1 + 1.
Proof. Consider Nλk as a g′ -module. We will analyze the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence
(2.8.1) with respect to the exact sequences (3.1.8.1) and (3.1.8.2). Everything is equivariant
with respect to gl(E) × gl(F ) so we will keep track of this symmetry.
For H0 , the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence gives us the following identity:
H0 (Sym2 (F ); H0 (g; N k )) ∼
= H0 (g′ ; N k ) ∼
= H0 (E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ ; H0 (u; N k )).
λ
λ
From Theorem 3.2.2,
(3.2.3.1)
H0 (u; Nλk ) = Sλ (E ∗ |F ) ⊗ (det E ∗ )k ⊗ (det F ∗ )k .
Proposition 2.8.2 gives
H0 (E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ ; Sλ (E ∗ |F )) = Sν (F ) ⊗ Sµ† (E ∗ ).
λ
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
15
Hence
H0 (Sym2 (F ); H0 (g; Nλk )) = S(kn )+µ† (E ∗ ) ⊗ S((n+d)×k)\ν (F ∗ ),
so by Proposition 2.8.3, we have
H0 (g; Nλk ) = S(kn )+µ† (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[((n+d)×k)\ν] (V ).
(3.2.3.2)
Now we calculate H1 . First consider the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence for (3.1.8.1).
As a gl(E) × gl(F )-representation, H1 (g′ ; Nλk ) is the direct sum of E21,0 and the cokernel
of d2 : E22,0 → E20,1 . We claim that d2 = 0. First, E22,0 = H2 (Sym2 (F ); H0 (g; Nλk )) and
E20,1 = H0 (Sym2 (F ); H1 (g; Nλk )). The action of the Lie algebra Sym2 (F ) commutes with the
action of gl(E). From (3.2.3.2), H0 (g; Nλk ) is gl(E)-isotypic, i.e., is a direct sum of copies of
the same representation S(kn )+µ† (E ∗ ). Since H1 (g; Nλk ) ⊂ H0 (g; Nλk ) ⊗ U(g)>0 , and U(g)>0
does not contain any gl(E)-invariants, we conclude that the S(kn )+µ† (E ∗ )-isotypic component
of H1 (g; Nλk ) is 0. Hence d2 = 0. So we get
∼ H0 (Sym2 (F ); H1 (g; N k )) ⊕ H1 (Sym2 (F ); H0 (g; N k )).
H1 (g′ ; N k ) =
λ
λ
λ
H1 (g; Nλk ),
∗
So, to calculate
we first remove the S(kn )+µ† (E )-isotypic component from H1 (g′ ; Nλk ).
Now consider the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence of (3.1.8.2). By Theorem 3.2.2,
H1 (u; Nλk ) = S(λ,12k+2−2ℓ(λ) ) (E ∗ |F ) ⊗ (det E ∗ )k ⊗ (det F ∗ )k .
Setting ν ′ = (2k + 2 − ℓ(λ), ν2 , . . . , νn+d ) (the first n + d columns of (λ, 12k+2−2ℓ(λ) )), Proposition 2.8.2 gives
E20,1 = H0 (E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ ; H1 (u; Nλk )) = S(kn )+µ† (E ∗ ) ⊗ (det F ∗ )k ⊗ Sν ′ (F ),
so we can ignore it for the purposes of calculating H1 (g; Nλk ), i.e.,
H0 (Sym2 (F ); H1 (g; N k )) ∼
= E2 = H1 (E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ ; H0 (u; N k ))
λ
λ
1,0
∗ k
= (det F ) ⊗ S(ν1 ,...,νn+d−1,µ1 −1) (F ) ⊗ (det E ∗ )k ⊗ S(1+νn+d ,µ2 ,µ3 ,... )† (E ∗ ).
One more application of Proposition 2.8.3 gives us the desired formula for H1 (g; Nλk ).
Proposition 3.2.4. If λ1 ≤ d and ℓ(λ) ≤ k, then Nλk has a linear free resolution over U(g).
Proof. Consider Nλk as a g′ -module. We will analyze the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence
(2.8.1) with respect to the exact sequences (3.1.8.1) and (3.1.8.2). Everything is equivariant
with respect to gl(E)×gl(F ) so we will keep track of this symmetry. In particular, the center
of gl(E) puts a grading on all vector spaces that are involved according to which multiple of
the trace character it acts by (we use the convention that D times the trace means degree
−D). We will prove by induction on i that Hi (g; Nλk ) is concentrated in degree i + nk.
The base case i = 0 follows from Proposition 3.2.3. Note that Hi (g; Nλk ) is concentrated in
degrees ≥ i + nk since the smallest degree appearing in Hi is strictly bigger than the smallest
degree appearing in Hi−1 (use that Hi ⊂ Hi−1 ⊗ U(g)>0 ).
Since the action of Sym2 (F ) commutes with the gl(E)-action, this is the same as proving
that H0 (Sym2 (F ); Hi (g; Nλk )) is concentrated in degree i + nk. In the Hochschild–Serre
spectral sequence for (3.1.8.1), this is the term E20,i . We claim that it is the same as E∞
0,i .
The relevant differentials are of the form Err,i−r+1 → Er0,i . But Err,i−r+1 is a subquotient of
E2r,i−r+1 = Hr (Sym2 (F ); Hi−r+1(g; Nλk )). By induction, the latter is concentrated in degree
i − r + 1 + nk, andLhence the differential must be 0, and the claim is proven. Now, we
i
∞
∞
have Hi (g′ ; Nλk ) =
j=0 Ej,i−j . For j > 0, we know that Ej,i−j , being a subquotient of
16
STEVEN V SAM
Hj (Sym2 (F ); Hi−j (g; Nλk )), is concentrated in degree i − j + nk by induction. In conclusion,
H0 (Sym2 (F ); Hi (g; Nλk )) is the degree ≥ i + nk part of Hi (g′ ; Nλk ).
Using the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence for (3.1.8.2), Hi (g′ ; Nλk ) is a subquotient
L
of ij=0 Hj (E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ ; Hi−j (u; Nλk )). We will show that this space is concentrated in degree
≤ i + nk, which implies the result. Pick a partition α such that Sα (E ∗ |F ) ⊗ (det E ∗ )k ⊗
(det F ∗ )k ⊆ Hm (u; Nλk ). Then by Theorem 3.2.2, we have τ2k (α) = λ and ι2k (α) = m. Since
Sα (E ∗ |F ) 6= 0, we have αn+1 ≤ n + d. Let ρ = (−1, −2, −3, . . . ). By Proposition 2.8.2, to
calculate Hm′ (E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ ; Sα (E ∗ |F )), we apply the ρ-shifted action of a length m′ permutation
w to α† to get (β1 , . . . , βn+d , γ1 , γ2 , . . . ) so that β and γ are weakly decreasing and γ is
nonnegative. This contributes the representation Sβ (F ) ⊗ Sγ † (E ∗ ) (and so γ1 ≤ n). So we
just have to show that |γ| ≤ m + m′ . We isolate and prove this statement in Lemma 3.2.5
along with a calculation of what happens when |γ| = m + m′ .
Lemma 3.2.5. Fix k > 0. Let λ be a partition with λ1 ≤ d and ℓ(λ) ≤ k. Pick a
partition α with αn+1 ≤ n + d such that τ2k (α) = λ and let w be a permutation such that
w • α† = (β1 , . . . , βn+d , γ1 , γ2 , . . . ) with β1 ≥ · · · ≥ βn+d and n ≥ γ1 ≥ γ2 ≥ · · · ≥ 0.
Then |γ| ≤ ι2k (α) + ℓ(w). If |γ| = ι2k (α) + ℓ(w), then:
- ι2k (α) = 0 and α† = λ† = (β1 , . . . , βd ), and
- w • α† = (λ†1 , . . . , λ†d , −γn† , . . . , −γ1† , γ1 , γ2 , . . . ) where |γ| = ℓ(w).
Proof. We claim that
(3.2.5.1)
ι2k (α) ≥
X
max(αj − d − j + 1, 0).
j≥1
The modification rule (§2.7.1) expresses α \ λ as a disjoint union of border strips. Since
λ1 ≤ d, the part which is to the right of the dth column of α is expressed as a disjoint union
of border strips, and the right hand side of (3.2.5.1) is the least number of columns needed
in all of the border strips to do this. This proves the claim.
P
†
†
Set ν = (αn+d+1
, αn+d+2
, . . . ). If w = 1 is the identity, then |γ| = |ν| = j≥1 max(αj −
n − d, 0). Since αn+1 ≤ n + d, we conclude that this sum is ≤ ι2k (α).
Otherwise, suppose w 6= 1. To clarify the remainder of this argument, we use the convention that w(a1 , a2 , . . . ) = (aw−1 (1) , aw−1 (2) , . . . ) and set v = w −1 . Since β and γ are weakly
decreasing, we get v(1) < v(2) < · · · < v(n + d) and v(n + d + 1) < v(n + d + 2) < · · · . So
Pn+d
(v(j) − j), and hence
the number of inversions of w is ℓ(w) = ℓ(v) = j=1
|γ| = |α| − |β| =
(3.2.5.2)
X
(αj†
− βj ) =
j≥1
X
αj†
+
X
j>n+d
†
(αj† − αv(j)
+ v(j) − j)
j=1
j>n+d
=
n+d
X
αj† +
n+d
X
†
(αj† − αv(j)
) + ℓ(w).
j=1
Pn+d
Here we use the notation |β| = j=1
βj even though some entries of β may be negative.
Let i be minimal with the property that v(i) 6= i. From above, we get i ≤ n + d and
i = v(n + d + 1). Then γ1 = αi† + n + d + 1 − i. Since γ1 ≤ n, we get 0 ≥ αi† + d + 1 − i, i.e.,
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
17
αi† < i − d, and hence αi−d < i. So
(3.2.5.3)
X
j≥i
αj†
=
i−d−1
X
max(αj − i + 1, 0) ≤
j=1
i−d−1
X
max(αj − d − j, 0) ≤ ι2k (α)
j=1
where the last inequality is (3.2.5.1). By definition of i, and nonnegativity of α, we have
P
P
Pn+d †
†
†
†
α
≥
α
+
j≥i j
j>n+d j
j=1 (αj − αv(j) ), so combining this with (3.2.5.2), we conclude that
|γ| ≤ ι2k (α) + ℓ(w).
Now assume that |γ| = ι2k (α) + ℓ(w). In particular, all of the above inequalities are
equalities. From our proof of (3.2.5.1), it can only be an equality if d = 0 or ι2k (α) = 0
(if d > 0 and ι2k (α) > 0, then the boxes in the first d columns of α contribute to ι2k (α)).
Suppose further that d = 0. By (3.2.5.3), we have max(αj − i + 1, 0) = max(αj − j, 0) for
j = 1, . . . , i − 1. If i = 1, then the sum in (3.2.5.3) is empty, which means ι2k (α) = 0.
Otherwise i > 1, so max(α1 − i + 1, 0) = max(α1 − 1, 0), i.e., α1 ≤ 1. This implies that the
sum in (3.2.5.3) is empty, so again we get ι2k (α) = 0. In conclusion, we have ι2k (α) = 0 if
|γ| = ι2k (α) + ℓ(w) and hence that α† = λ† = (β1 , . . . , βd ) (by assumption, λ1 ≤ d).
So we are in the situation where w acts on a sequence of zeroes. The result of this is of the
form (−γn† , . . . , −γ1† , γ1, γ2 , . . . ) where |γ| = ℓ(w) (see, for example, [S4, §2.4]), which proves
the last part of the lemma.
Corollary 3.2.6. Let λ be a partition with λ1 ≤ d and ℓ(λ) ≤ k. As a representation of
GL(E) × Sp(V ), Hi (g; Nλk ) is a subrepresentation of
M
S(kn )+γ (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[((kn )+γ,k−λ† ,...,k−λ† )] (V ).
1
d
|γ|=i
ℓ(γ)≤n
Proof. In the proof of Proposition 3.2.4, we defined the degree of a representation in terms
of the gl(E) action and showed that H0 (Sym2 (F ); Hi (g; Nλk )) is the degree i + nk part of
Hi (g′ ; Nλk ), which is a subquotient (by semisimplicity, we can say subrepresentation) of the
L
degree i+nk part of ij=0 Hj (E ∗ ⊗F ∗ ; Hi−j (u; Nλk )). Combining the calculation of this space
in the proof of Proposition 3.2.4 with Lemma 3.2.5 gives that the latter representation is
M
P :=
S(kn )+γ (E ∗ ) ⊗ S((kn )+γ,k−λ† ,...,k−λ† ) (F ∗ ).
d
1
|γ|=i
ℓ(γ)≤n
If H0 (Sym2 (F ); P0 ) = P , then Hi (g; Nλk ) ⊆ P0 . Using Proposition 2.8.3, we get
M
P0 =
S(kn )+γ (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[((kn )+γ,k−λ† ,...,k−λ† )] (V ).
d
1
|γ|=i
ℓ(γ)≤n
3.3. Main result and consequences. We assume that char(k) = 0 in this section.
Recall the Z-grading on osp(Ve ) from §3.1. Let p be the sum of the nonpositive pieces. So
V
p = 2 (E) ⊕ (E ⊗ V ) ⊕ (gl(E) × sp(V )).
Given a representation W of gl(E) × sp(V ), extend it to a p-module by letting the negative
e
part act by 0. The induced representation is Indposp(V ) (W ) = U(osp(Ve )) ⊗U(p) W , which is a
representation of osp(Ve ). When W is irreducible, we call this a parabolic Verma module.
As a U(g)-module, it is isomorphic to U(g)⊗W . From the definition, if W is a representation
18
STEVEN V SAM
e
of osp(Ve ), and Indposp(V ) (W ) → W is U(g)-equivariant, then it is osp(Ve )-equivariant if and
only if the negative part of osp(Ve ) acts as 0 on the image of W in W. This implies:
e
Lemma 3.3.1. Let W0 be a graded osp(Ve )-submodule of Indposp(V ) (W ) which is generated by
e
W0 as a U(g)-module, so we have a surjection U(g) ⊗ W0 → W0 ⊂ Indposp(V ) (W ). If W0 is
concentrated in a single degree, then this map is equivariant for the natural action of osp(Ve ).
Theorem 3.3.2. Let λ be a partition with ℓ(λ) ≤ k and λn+1 ≤ n + d.
Set ν = (λ†1 , . . . , λ†n+d) and µ = (λ†n+d+1 , λ†n+d+2 , . . . ). Then:
(a) λ†n+d = λ†n+d+1 if and only if Nλk has a linear presentation as a U(g)-module.
(b) If λ†n+d = λ†n+d+1 , L(Nλk ) (notation of §2.2) is the first linear strand of a B-module M
with a compatible GL(E) × Sp(V )-action and which is uniquely determined by the fact
that it is generated in degree 0 with degree 1 relations, and satisfies
M0 = (det E)k ⊗ Sµ† (E) ⊗ S[((n+d)×k)\ν] (V ),
M1 = (det E)k ⊗ S(µ1 +1,µ2 ,µ3 ,... )† (E) ⊗ S[(k+1−νn+d ,k−νn+d−1,...,k−ν1)] (V ).
If furthermore λ1 ≤ d, then M ∼
= Mkλ† , and:
(c) L(Nλk ) is an acyclic linear complex and is a minimal free resolution of Mkλ† over B,
(d) R(Mkλ† ) is an acyclic linear complex and is a minimal free resolution of Nλk over U(g).
The action of g on this complex extends to an action of osp(Ve ) and each R(Mkλ† )i is a
direct sum of parabolic Verma modules.
Proof. (a) follows directly from Proposition 3.2.3. By Proposition 3.2.3 and Theorem 2.2.2,
L(Nλk ) is the first linear strand of the cokernel of (Nλk )∗1 ⊗ B(−1) → (Nλk )∗0 ⊗ B, and (Nλk )∗0 =
(det E)k ⊗Sµ† (E) ⊗S[((n+d)×k)\ν] (V ). Its tensor product with B1 = E ⊗V is multiplicity-free:
for all classical groups, the tensor product of an irreducible representation with the vector
representation is multiplicity-free [St, Theorem 1.1ABCD] (there the character of the vector
representation is denoted χ(ωn )). So the cokernel M is uniquely determined by the condition
that it is linearly presented as a B-module and Mi = Hi (g; Nλk ) for i = 0, 1. This proves (b).
When λ1 ≤ d, the module Mkλ† satisfies these conditions except that we do not yet know
if it has a linear presentation. We have a surjection M → Mkλ† , which is an isomorphism
by comparing Corollary 3.2.6 and (3.1.5). So (c) and (d) are an immediate consequence of
Proposition 3.2.4 and Theorem 2.2.2. The second statement of (d) follows from Lemma 3.3.1
by induction on i since the free resolution of Nλk over U(g) is linear.
Conjecture 3.3.3. Let Iλ be the ideal generated by Sλ (E)⊗S[λ] (V ) in B. Then the resolution
of Iλ is a representation of osp(Ve ). Furthermore, each linear strand is irreducible.
Now we derive a few consequences of Theorem 3.3.2.
First, we begin with an alternative construction of Mkν . Consider IGr(n, V ) with vector
bundles η = E ⊗ R∗ , and Vνk = (det E)k ⊗ (det R∗ )k ⊗ S[(d×k)\ν] (R⊥ /R).
Proposition 3.3.4. Mkν = H0 (IGr(n, V ); Sym(η) ⊗ Vνk ).
Proof. Let X be the partial isotropic flag variety IFl(n, n + d, V ) with tautological flag
Rn ⊂ Rn+d ⊂ V . Let π1 : X → IGr(n, V ) and π2 : X → IGr(n + d, V ) be the projections.
Let R and R′ be the tautological subbundles on IGr(n, V ) and IGr(n + d, V ), respectively.
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
19
First, π1 is the relative Grassmannian Gr(d, R⊥ /R). So
S[(d×k)\ν] (R⊥ /R) = π1∗ (S(d×k)\ν (R⊥
n /Rn+d ))
using Theorem 2.5.4 and Remark 2.5.6. Set
W = Sym(E ⊗ R∗n ) ⊗ (det E)k ⊗ (det R∗n )k ⊗ S(d×k)\ν (R⊥
n /Rn+d ).
Since Rn = π1∗ (R), the projection formula gives Sym(η) ⊗ Vνk = π1∗ (W). Next, π2 is
the relative Grassmannian Gr(n, R′ ). The symplectic form on V induces an isomorphism
∗
∼ ∗
R⊥
n /Rn+d = Rn+d /Rn . So applying π2∗ to W is a relative version of the construction in
§2.6, which is how we defined Mνk (E, R′ ∗ ).
So pushing forward Sym(η) ⊗ Vνk to a point is the same as pushing forward Mνk (E, R′ ∗ )
to a point. Since the latter is Mkν , we are done.
Define the following vector bundle on IGr(n, V ):
Eλν = Sλ (R⊥ ) ⊗ (det R∗ )k ⊗ S[(d×k)\ν] (R⊥ /R).
Corollary 3.3.5. Let Fν• be the minimal free resolution of Mkν over A. Then
M
M
Fνi =
Hj (IGr(n, V );
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ Eλν† ) ⊗ A(−i − j).
j≥0
|λ|=i+j
λ⊆n×(n+2d)
Proof. In the notation of §2.4, ξ = E ⊗ R⊥ . Now use Proposition 3.3.4, Theorem 2.4.1, and
Theorem 2.3.3.
It is probably difficult to give a closed formula to simplify the above expression, but the
next theorem sheds some light on the relevant combinatorial features. While this result looks
similar to the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem, it is not a special case because the vector bundles
Eλν are not irreducible homogeneous bundles. To strengthen the analogy, we point the reader
to [SSW, §3.5] where ι2k and τ2k are defined in terms of the Weyl group of type BC∞ .
Theorem 3.3.6. Let ν ⊆ (k d ) and λ ⊆ n×(n+2d) be partitions and let R be the tautological
subbundle on IGr(n, V ).
(a) If k ≥ ℓ(λ), then Hi (IGr(n, V ); Eλν† ) = 0 for i > 0.
(b) The cohomology of Eλν† vanishes unless τ2k (λ) = µ is defined, in which case the cohomology is nonzero only in degree ι2k (λ) = i, and we have an Sp(V )-equivariant isomorphism
Hi (IGr(n, V ); E ν† ) ∼
= H0 (IGr(n, V ); E ν† ).
µ
λ
Proof. Let F• be the minimal free resolution of Mkν over A. Using [Ei1, §7], we can use it to
build a free resolution G• of Mkν over B. We just need a few properties of this construction.
First, the terms are given by
⌊i/2⌋
Gi =
M
j=0
V2
Fi−2j (−2j) ⊗k Dj (
V2
(E)).
Second, if we set S = Sym( (E ∗ )), then R(G• ) is a minimal complex of S-modules, and
applying L to its homology gives the minimal free resolution of Mkν over B. By Theorem 3.3.2, the minimal free resolution of Mkν is linear over B, which means that R(G• ) only
has homology in degree 0, and H0 (R(G• )) = Nνk† . Putting this together implies
k
TorSi (Nνk† , k)∗j = TorA
j (Mν , k)i+j .
20
STEVEN V SAM
Now consider the GL(E) × Sp(V )-action on TorSi (Nνk† , k)∗j . If S(kn )+λ (E ∗ ) has a nonzero
GL(E)-isotypic component, then τ2k (λ) is well-defined and ι2k (λ) = i by Theorem 3.2.2 (or
[SSW, Proposition 3.13]). In particular, since the GL(E) and Sp(V ) actions commute, we
have an isomorphism of Sp(V )-representations
HomGL(E) (S(kn )+λ (E ∗ ), TorSι2k (λ) (Nνk† , k)∗|λ| ) ∼
= HomGL(E) (S(kn )+τ2k (λ) (E ∗ ), TorS0 (Nνk† , k)∗|τ2k (λ)| ).
Combining Theorem 2.4.1 and Corollary 3.3.5, we get
M
k
j
TorA
(M
,
k)
=
H
(IGr(n,
V
);
i+j
i
ν
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ Eλν† ).
|λ|=i+j
λ⊆n×(n+2d)
Combining everything, we get an isomorphism of Sp(V )-representations
Hι2k (λ) (IGr(n, V ); Eλν† ) ∼
= H0 (IGr(n, V ); Eτν2k (λ)† ),
and that HN (IGr(n, V ); Eλν† ) = 0 if N 6= ι2k (λ).
The method of the proof of Theorem 3.3.6 is a clean, elegant approach, but it is in some
ways unsatisfactory since it appeals to so many other techniques. We have another proof
which is more direct, but has the disadvantage of only working for ν = (k d ) and is much
longer. Since it may be of independent interest, we include this alternate proof in [S5].
Remark 3.3.7. As in §3.1, we interpret A as the coordinate ring of the space of linear maps
E → V ∗ and hence it makes sense to talk about the generic map with respect to A, i.e.,
picking bases for E and V ∗ , the matrix entries are the variables of A. Similar comments
apply to B. The ideal of maximal minors in B of this generic matrix is generated by
V
n
(E) ⊗ S[1n ] (V ). When ν = (k d ), (3.1.5) becomes
M
Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ] (V ),
Mk(kd ) =
λ, λn ≥k
which is the kth power of the maximal minors in B (use Proposition 3.1.2(c)).
Corollary 3.3.8. For ν ⊆ (k d ), if k ≥ n − 1, then the minimal free resolution of Mkν over
A is linear.
Proof. Combine Corollary 3.3.5 and Theorem 3.3.6(a).
For every pair of finitely generated B-modules M and N, V
there is an action of U(g) ∼
=
2
•
•
∗
ExtB (k, k) on ExtB (M, N) which we can restrict to S = Sym( (E )). The support of this
V
module is the support variety of the pair (M, N), and is a subscheme of Spec(S) = 2 (E).
The basic properties of support varieties are developed in [AB]. We define the support
variety of a single module M to be the support variety of the pair (M, k). Note that
∗
ExtiB (M, k) = TorB
i (M, k) .
d
k
Proposition 3.3.9. Choose a partition ν ⊆ (k
V2). The support variety of Mν is reduced and
is the variety of skew-symmetric matrices in
(E) of rank ≤ 2k.
Proof. We have L(Mkν ) = Nνk† by Theorem 3.3.2. With the notation in §3.2, we have
V
(3.3.9.1)
U = Sym(U ⊗ (E ∗ |F )) = Sym(U ⊗ E ∗ ) ⊗ • (U ⊗ F ).
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
21
The first tensor factor has a multiplicity-free action of Sp(U) × so(E ⊕ E ∗ ), and the second
has a multiplicity-free action of Sp(U) × sp(V ). We have
M
Sym(U ⊗ E ∗ ) =
S[µ] (U) ⊗ Mµso ,
(3.3.9.2)
ℓ(µ)≤min(n,k)
V•
(U ⊗ F ) =
M
S[λ] (U) ⊗ S[((n+d)×k)\λ† ] (V ),
λ⊆k×(n+d)
where (det E)k ⊗ Mµso is the module Mµ in [SSW, §3.5]. So as an S-module, Nνk† is a direct
sum of modules of the form Mµso . On each module, the action of S factors through M∅so ,
which is the coordinate ring of the variety of skew-symmetric matrices of rank ≤ 2k.
Remark 3.3.10. Using [Av, Theorem 3.9, Corollary 3.12], we get the following statement.
V
Let W ⊂ 2 (E) be a linear subspace of complementary dimension to the space of skewsymmetric matrices of rank ≤ 2k so that their intersection is 0. Then Mkν has finite projective
dimension over A/(W ). It would be interesting to understand the minimal free resolution of
Mkν over A/(W ).
3.4. Cokernels. For background on multilinear algebra on chain complexes, see [Wey, §2.4].
Let ϕ : E ⊗ B(−1) → V ⊗ B be the generic matrix. Let Ve = (E ⊕ E ∗ ) ⊕ V where E ⊕ E ∗ is
given an orthogonal form as in §3.1. The complex
ϕ
ϕ∗
V : 0 → E ⊗ B(−2) −
→ V ⊗ B(−1) −→ E ∗ ⊗ B
carries an action of the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra osp(Ve ) ⊗ B. Here the indexing is
such that V0 = E ∗ ⊗ B, V1 = V ⊗ B(−1), and V2 = E ⊗ B(−2). Then we have
Sym2B (V) : 0 → Sym2 (E) ⊗ B(−4) → E ⊗ V ⊗ B(−3) →
V
( 2 (V ) ⊕ (E ⊗ E ∗ )) ⊗ B(−2) → E ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ B(−1) → Sym2 (E ∗ ) ⊗ B.
The space of gl(E) × sp(VV) invariants in E ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ B(−1) in degree 2 is 1-dimensional, and
the space of invariants in 2 (V ) ⊕ (E ⊗ E ∗ ) is 2-dimensional, so there is an invariant in the
latter space which represents a nonzero homology class. We write this as a map of complexes
B[−2] → Sym2B (V). Using the multiplication map for symmetric powers, we get an injective
k−2
map of complexes (SymB
(V))[−2] → SymkB (V), and the cokernel is denoted Symk0 (V).
Proposition 3.4.1. If 2 dim(E) + 2d = dim(V ), then Symd+1
0 (V) is acyclic and resolves
d+1
d+1
∗
∗
SymB (coker ϕ ). In particular, SymB (coker ϕ ) is a perfect module.
Proof. Set F = Symd+1
0 (V), which is a complex of length 2d + 2. By the Peskine–Szpiro
acyclicity lemma [Ei2, Theorem 20.9], F is acyclic if and only if the localization Fp is acyclic
for every prime ideal p ⊂ B with grade(p) < 2d + 2 (recall that the grade of an ideal is the
longest regular sequence contained in it). Pick such a prime p. The ideal generated by the
maximal minors has grade 2d + 2: since B is Cohen–Macaulay, the grade of any ideal I is
dim(B) − dim(B/I); if I is the ideal of maximal minors, then an easy calculation (or see
[SW, Theorem 2.2(1)]) shows that this is 2d + 2. So there is at least one maximal minor
that is not in p. After inverting this minor, there is a change of basis so that ϕ becomes
ϕ′ = In 0 where In is an n × n identity matrix and 0 is the n × (n + 2d) zero matrix.
We claim that Fp is exact. Using the special form of ϕ′ , we can decompose V ⊗B Bp as
the direct sum of a split exact sequence with (W ⊗ Bp )[−1], where dim(W ) = 2d and W
22
STEVEN V SAM
inherits a symplectic form from V (the image of E in V is isotropic since V is a complex,
and W = E ⊥ /E). In particular, Symd+1
Bp (V) is a direct sum of a split exact complex with
Vd+1
(
(W ) ⊗ Bp )[−d − 1]. Similarly, Symd−1
Bp (V)[−2] is a direct sum of a split exact complex
Vd−1
V
V
with (
(W )⊗Bp )[−d−1]. The induced map on homology d−1 (W )⊗Bp → d+1 (W )⊗Bp
is multiplication by the symplectic form on W , so it is an isomorphism. This implies that Fp is
d+1
∗
exact. Finally, H0 (Symd+1
(V)), and the latter module is Symd+1
0 (V)) = H0 (Sym
B (coker ϕ )
by right-exactness of symmetric powers (see, for example, [Ei2, Proposition A2.2(d)]).
Remark 3.4.2. It remains to construct finite length (linear) resolutions supported on lowerorder minors. These should be orthosymplectic generalizations of Schur complexes which in
turn should be special cases of orthogonal and symplectic analogues of Schubert complexes.
See [S1] for Schubert complexes and their connections with double Schubert polynomials,
and see [Wey, Exercises 6.34–6.36] for an analogue of our situation when B is replaced by
the polynomial ring.
For dim(E) = n and dim(V ) = 2n + 2d, we have that the rank n − 1, n − 2, n − 3, n − 4 loci
have codimensions 2d + 2, 4d + 7, 6d + 15, and 8d + 26, respectively. When this codimension
is odd, we cannot use an orthosymplectic Schur functor as we did above.
3.5. Examples. In general, the resolution of Mkν , under the action of GL(E) × Sp(V ),
contains representations with high multiplicity (hence the main advantage of having an
irreducible action of the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra). Now we explain how the simplest
examples can be calculated using a few tricks. This amounts to calculating Nνk† (after
replacing E with E ∗ ), which is the S[ν † ] (U)-isotypic component of U . To do this, use the
decompositions (3.3.9.1) and (3.3.9.2). When ν = ∅, we get (using that representations of
Sp(U) are self-dual)
M
S[((n+d)×k)\µ† ] (V ) ⊗ Mµso .
µ⊆min(n,k)×(n+d)
If k = 1, then Sp(U) = SL(U) and Sλ (U) = S[λ1 −λ2 ] (U). Using Theorem 2.3.3, we get
M
Mµso =
S(µ1 +e,e) (E ∗ ).
e≥0
Finally, we tensor with (det E ∗ ) because of the way that Howe duality is setup.
Below, we abbreviate Sλ (E) ⊗ S[µ] (V ) with the notation (λ; µ).
Example 3.5.1. Take dim(E) = 4 and dim(V ) = 8 with V symplectic. We consider the
ideal M1∅ generated by the 4 × 4 minors. The first few terms of its minimal free resolution
over the coordinate ring of the Littlewood variety are
F0 = (1, 1, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 1)
F1 = (2, 1, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0)
F2 = (2, 2, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 1) ⊕ (3, 1, 1, 1; 1, 1, 0, 0)
F3 = (3, 2, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0) ⊕ (4, 1, 1, 1; 1, 0, 0, 0)
F4 = (3, 3, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 1) ⊕ (4, 2, 1, 1; 1, 1, 0, 0) ⊕ (5, 1, 1, 1; 0, 0, 0, 0)
F5 = (4, 3, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0) ⊕ (5, 2, 1, 1; 1, 0, 0, 0)
F6 = (4, 4, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 1) ⊕ (5, 3, 1, 1; 1, 1, 0, 0) ⊕ (6, 2, 1, 1; 0, 0, 0, 0)
F7 = (5, 4, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0) ⊕ (6, 3, 1, 1; 1, 0, 0, 0)
..
.
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
23
The graded Betti table of M1∅ over the polynomial ring (it is not an ideal in this setting) is
0
1
2
3
4
5 6 7
total: 42 192 462 607 485 257 77 10
4: 42 192 270 160 35
. . .
5: .
. 192 447 288 70 . .
6: .
.
.
. 162 160 45 .
7: .
.
.
.
. 27 32 10
Here
V are the representations for the resolution of the Littlewood ideal (we removed a factor
of 4 (E) = det E):
V3
V4
0V
0V
⊗E
V2
⊗ S2E
V3
E
0V ⊗
0V
V3
V ⊗ S3E
V2
V ⊗ S2,1,1 E
V04
V4
E
0V ⊗
S4E
V ⊗ S3,1,1 E
V2
0 V ⊗ S2,2,1,1 E
S4,1,1 E
V ⊗ S3,2,1,1 E
V2
0 V ⊗ S2,2,2,2 E
S4,2,1,1 E
V ⊗ S3,2,2,2 E
S4,2,2,2 E
Compare this with the proof of Theorem 3.3.6.
We end with a slightly more complicated example not covered by the above derivation.
Example 3.5.2. Take dim(E) = 3 and dim(V ) = 8 with V symplectic. We consider the
ideal M1(1) generated by the 3 × 3 minors. The first few terms of its minimal free resolution
over the coordinate ring of the Littlewood variety are
F0 = (1, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0)
F1 = (2, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 1) ⊕ (2, 1, 1; 1, 1, 0, 0)
F2 = (2, 2, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0) ⊕ (3, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0) ⊕ (3, 1, 1; 1, 0, 0, 0)
F3 = (3, 2, 1; 1, 1, 1, 1) ⊕ (3, 2, 1; 1, 1, 0, 0) ⊕ (4, 1, 1; 1, 1, 0, 0) ⊕ (4, 1, 1; 0, 0, 0, 0)
F4 = (3, 3, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0) ⊕ (4, 2, 1; 1, 1, 1, 0) ⊕ (4, 2, 1; 1, 0, 0, 0) ⊕ (5, 1, 1; 1, 0, 0, 0)
F5 = (4, 3, 1; 1, 1, 1, 1) ⊕ (4, 3, 1; 1, 1, 0, 0) ⊕ (5, 2, 1; 1, 1, 0, 0) ⊕ (5, 2, 1; 0, 0, 0, 0) ⊕ (6, 1, 1; 0, 0, 0, 0)
..
.
4. Orthogonal Littlewood varieties
D
′
Fix d′ ∈ {0, 1}. In this section, we use τ2k and ι2k to denote τ2k
and ιD
2k (see §2.7.2) if d = 0
∆
′
and we use them to denote τ2k
and ι∆
2k (see §2.7.3) if d = 1. For simplicity of exposition,
we assume char(k) 6= 2 so that we do not need to distinguish between quadratic forms and
orthogonal forms, although with more care one could include this case in some of the results.
4.1. Preliminaries. Let E be a vector space of dimension n and let V be an orthogonal
space of dimension 2n + 2d + d′ (we assume d ≥ 0; some of the results below hold even if
d < 0, but we will not need them). Let A = Sym(E ⊗ V ). Using the orthogonal form, we
have a GL(E) × O(V )-equivariant inclusion
Sym2 (E) ⊂ Sym2 (E) ⊗ Sym2 (V ) ⊂ Sym2 (E ⊗ V ).
Let B = A/(Sym2 (E)) be the quotient of A by the ideal generated by Sym2 (E).
Example 4.1.1. Let n = 2 and d = 0 and d′ = 1, and pick bases for E and V . We think of
the coordinates in A as the elements in a 2 × 5 matrix:
x1,1 x1,2 x1,3 x1,4 x1,5
x2,1 x2,2 x2,3 x2,4 x2,5
24
STEVEN V SAM
If the orthogonal form on V is given by ωV (v, w) = v1 w2 + v2 w1 + v3 w4 + v4 w3 + v5 w5 , then
Sym2 (E) is spanned by the 3 equations
x1,1 x2,2 + x1,2 x2,1 + x1,3 x2,4 + x1,4 x2,3 + x1,5 x2,5 ,
2(x1,1 x1,2 + x1,3 x1,4 ) + x21,5 ,
2(x2,1 x2,2 + x2,3 x2,4 ) + x22,5 .
We have Spec(A) = Hom(E, V ∗ ), the space of linear maps E → V ∗ . We can identify
ϕ
Spec(B) ⊂ Hom(E, V ∗ ) with the set of maps ϕ such that the composition E −
→ V∗ ∼
=
ϕ∗
∗
∗
V −→ E is 0 (here V ∼
= V is the isomorphism induced by the orthogonal form on V ).
Alternatively, Spec(B) is the subvariety of maps E → V ∗ such that the image of E is an
isotropic subspace, i.e., the restriction of the orthogonal form to it is the 0 form.
Proposition 4.1.2. (a) If 2d+d′ > 0, then B is an integral domain, i.e., the ideal generated
by Sym2 (E) is prime. If 2d + d′ = 0, then Spec(B) has 2 irreducible components.
(b) As a representation of GL(E) × O(V ), we have
M
B≈
Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ] (V ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
(c) Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ] (V ) is in the ideal generated by Sµ (E) ⊗ S[µ] (V ) if and only if λ ⊇ µ.
(d) Two closed points in Spec(B) are in the same GL(E) × O(V ) orbit if and only if they
have the same rank as a matrix. Each orbit closure is a normal variety with rational
singularities. In particular, they are Cohen–Macaulay varieties.
(e) The ideal (Sym2 (E)) is generated by a regular sequence. In particular, B is a complete
intersection and is a Koszul algebra.
Proof. For (a), (b), (d), and (e), see [SW, Theorems 2.7, 2.10]. (c) follows from the analogous
statement for Sym(E ⊗ V ) [DEP, Corollary 4.2].
Let OGr(n + d, V ) be the isotropic Grassmannian of rank n + d isotropic subspaces of V
with tautological subbundle R. Note that when 2d + d′ = 0, OGr(n + d, V ) has 2 connected
components, and otherwise it is connected. Let ν ⊆ (k d ) be a partition. Using (2.6.2) in a
relative situation, we get a Sym(E ⊗ R∗ )-module Mνk (E, R∗ ).
Proposition 4.1.3. The higher sheaf cohomology groups of Mνk (E, R∗ ) vanish and
M
H0 (OGr(n + d, V ); Mνk (E, R∗ )) ≈
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ S[(kn )+λ,k−νd ,...,k−ν1] (V ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
Proof. Similar to Proposition 3.1.4, but use Theorem 2.5.5.
We define
(4.1.4)
Mkν = H0 (OGr(n + d, V ); Mνk (E, R∗ ))
M
≈
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ S[((kn )+λ,k−νd ,...,k−ν1)] (V ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
So Mkν is an A-module. In fact, the scheme-theoretic image of Spec(Sym(E ⊗ R∗ )) →
Spec(A) is Spec(B), so Mkν is also a B-module.
The following result is the orthogonal version of the main result of this paper. A more
detailed version of this theorem is contained in Theorem 4.3.1.
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
25
Theorem 4.1.5. Assume char(k) = 0. The minimal free resolution of Mkν over B is linear.
Let Ve be a Z/2-graded space (from now on, superspace) with Ve0 = E ⊕ E ∗ and Ve1 = V .
Define a nondegenerate symplectic form on E ⊕ E ∗ by h(e, ϕ), (e′ , ϕ′ )i = ϕ′ (e) − ϕ(e′ ). Then
Ve has a super skew-symmetric bilinear form by taking the direct sum of the symplectic
form on E ⊕ E ∗ and the orthogonal form on V . Let spo(Ve ) be the orthosymplectic Lie
superalgebra in gl(Ve ) compatible with this form. We have a Z-grading on spo(Ve ) supported
on [−2, 2] (we use the symbol ⊕ to separate the different pieces of this grading):
Sym2 (E) ⊕ (E ⊗ V ) ⊕ (gl(E) × so(V )) ⊕ (E ∗ ⊗ V ∗ ) ⊕ Sym2 (E ∗ ).
Let g be the positive part of this grading, i.e.,
g = (E ∗ ⊗ V ∗ ) ⊕ Sym2 (E ∗ ).
Then Sym2 (E ∗ ) is central in g. For e⊗v, e′ ⊗v ′ ∈ E ∗ ⊗V ∗ , we have [e⊗v, e′ ⊗v ′ ] = ωV (v, v ′)ee′
where ωV is the orthogonal form on V ∗ ∼
= V . So Proposition 2.2.3 implies the following:
Proposition 4.1.6. The Koszul dual of B is the universal enveloping algebra U(g).
Let F ⊂ V be a maximal isotropic subspace and write V = F ⊕ F ∗ ⊕ L (dim(L) = d′ ).
Let u = ((E ∗ |F ) ⊗ L) ⊕ Sym2 (E ∗ |F ) ⊂ spo(Ve ). It inherits a Z-grading:
V
u0 = (F ⊗ L) ⊕ 2 (F ), u1 = E ∗ ⊗ (L ⊕ F ), u2 = Sym2 (E ∗ ).
Let g′ ⊂ osp(Ve ) be the subalgebra generated by u and g. Then it also has a Z-grading:
V
g′0 = (F ⊗ L) ⊕ 2 (F ), g′1 = E ∗ ⊗ V ∗ , g′2 = Sym2 (E ∗ ).
Lemma 4.1.7. We have the following two exact sequences of Lie superalgebras
V
0 → g → g′ → (F ⊗ L) ⊕ 2 (F ) → 0,
0 → u → g′ → E ∗ ⊗ F ∗ → 0.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Lemma 3.1.8.
4.2. Howe duality. In this section, we assume that char(k) = 0.
Let U be a 2k-dimensional orthogonal space. Then U ⊗ Ve is a superspace with even
part U ⊗ (E ⊕ E ∗ ) and odd part U ⊗ V and has a super skew-symmetric bilinear form by
taking the tensor product of the forms on U and Ve . Let spo(U ⊗ Ve ) be the associated
orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra. Pick a maximal isotropic subspace U ′ ⊂ U. Let E ∗ |F
denote the superspace with even part E ∗ and odd part F and let 0|L be the superspace with
odd part L. Then (U ⊗ (E ∗ |F )) ⊕ (U ′ ⊗ (0|L)) is a maximal isotropic subspace of U ⊗ Ve and
hence we get an oscillator representation
V
U = Sym(U ⊗ (E ∗ |F )) ⊗ • (U ′ ⊗ L)
of spo(U ⊗ Ve ). Both so(U) and spo(Ve ) are subalgebras of spo(U ⊗ Ve ) which commute with
one another, so so(U) × spo(Ve ) acts on U . As a representation of so(U), U is a direct sum
of finite-dimensional representations, so we can use the pin group Pin(U) (this is a double
cover of the orthogonal group O(U)) instead. If L = 0, i.e., d′ = 0, then the action of Pin(U)
factors through an action of O(U). In fact, there is more data by using the non-connected
group Pin(U) as we now explain. Pick a partition λ.
26
STEVEN V SAM
• If d′ = 0, λ is admissible if λ†1 + λ†2 ≤ 2k and we consider representations S[λ] (U) of
O(U). For λ†1 ≤ k, this is discussed in §2.3. Otherwise, set µ†1 = 2k − λ†1 and µ†i = λ†i
for i > 1. Then S[µ] (V ) and S[λ] (V ) differ by a twist of the sign character and we
write µ = λσ . Further, define λ = λ if λ†1 ≤ k, otherwise define λ = λσ .
• If d′ = 1, λ is admissible if ℓ(λ) ≤ k and we consider highest-weight representations
Vλ+δ± where δ+ and δ− are the half-spin weights of Spin(U) (see [SW, §3.1]). Define
Vλ+δ = Vλ+δ+ ⊕ Vλ+δ− ,
which can be made into an irreducible representation of Pin(U).
To unify the notation for both cases, we define
(
S[λ] (U) if d′ = 0
Vλ+d′ δ =
.
Vλ+δ
if d′ = 1
e k be the Vλ+d′ δ -isotypic
Let λ be an admissible partition with λn+1 ≤ n + d. Let N
λ
component of U with respect to the action of Pin(U). We need some of the following facts
about the action of Pin(U) ×spo(Ve ) (we will not use unitarizability, and hence do not define
it; we state it only for completeness):
e k is an irreducible,
Theorem 4.2.1. For an admissible partition λ with λn+1 ≤ n + d, N
λ
e k′ if and only if
ek ∼
N
unitarizable, lowest-weight representation of spo(Ve ). We have N
=
λ
λ
λ = λ′ . As a representation of Pin(U) × spo(Ve ), we have a direct sum decomposition
M
V
e k.
Vλ+d′ δ ⊗ N
U = Sym(U ⊗ (E ∗ |F )) ⊗ • (U ′ ⊗ L) =
λ
λ admissible
λn+1 ≤n+d
Proof. For d′ = 0, see [CW, §§5.3.4, 5.3.5] and for d′ = 1, see [CKW, §A.1].
e k which is a Z-graded representation with
Note that gl(E) × so(V ) ⊂ spo(Ve ) acts on N
λ
finite-dimensional pieces and the action can be integrated to the group GL(E) × SO(V ).
However, when dim(V ) is even, we may not be able to extend this action to GL(E) × O(V ).
We now make an additional definition
(
ek ⊕ N
e kσ if d′ = 0 and ℓ(λ) < k
N
λ
Nλk = eλk
.
Nλ
otherwise
Then the action of GL(E) × SO(V ) on Nλk extends to GL(E) × O(V ).
Theorem 4.2.2. We have a gl(E) × gl(F )-equivariant isomorphism
M
U(u)
Hi (u; Nλk ) = Tori (Nλk , k) ∼
Sα (E ∗ |F ) ⊗ (det E ∗ )k ⊗ (det F ∗ )k .
=
α
τ2k (α)=λ
ι2k (α)=i
Proof. See [CKW, Theorem 5.7]. Their notation does not match ours, so alternatively one
can use [SSW, §4] if d′ = 0 and [SS] if d′ = 1 (see proof of Theorem 3.2.2 for comments).
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
27
Proposition 4.2.3. Let λ be a partition with ℓ(λ) ≤ k and λn+1 ≤ n + d and set ν =
(λ†1 , . . . , λ†n+d ) and µ = (λ†n+d+1 , λ†n+d+2 , . . . ). Then
H0 (g; Nλk ) = (det E ∗ )k ⊗ Sµ† (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[((n+d)×k)\ν] (V )
H1 (g; Nλk ) = (det E ∗ )k ⊗ S(1+νn+d ,µ2 ,µ3 ,... )† (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[(k−µ1 +1,k−νn+d−1,...,k−ν1)] (V ).
In particular, as a U(g)-module, Nλk is generated in a single degree and has relations of
degree λ†n+d − λ†n+d+1 + 1.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Proposition 3.2.3. There is one point to highlight though: in
Proposition 2.8.3, we see that when dim(V ) is even and λn+d > 0, that H0 (n; S[λ] (V )) is a sum
of two irreducible representations of gl(F ). This does not happen in Proposition 3.2.3 and is
accounted for by the fact that Nλk is defined to be a sum of two irreducible representations
in these cases. Rather than chase signs, we note that the representations S[λ]± (V ) always
come together in each homology group since there is an action of O(V ) on everything.
Proposition 4.2.4. If λ1 ≤ d and ℓ(λ) ≤ k, then Nλk has a linear free resolution over U(g).
As a representation of GL(E) × O(V ), Hi (g; Nλk ) is a subrepresentation of
M
S(kn )+γ (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[((kn )+γ,k−λ† ,...,k−λ† )] (V ).
d
1
|γ|=i
ℓ(γ)≤n
Proof. The proof of the first part is similar to the proof of Proposition 3.2.4. See also the
comments in the proof of Proposition 4.2.3. The proof of the second part is similar to
the proof of Corollary 3.2.6. As an intermediate step, we need to prove an analogue of
Lemma
3.2.5. This is almost the same, but the inequality (3.2.5.1) is replaced by ι2k (α) ≥
P
D
j≥1 max(αj − d − j, 0) since the definition of ι2k uses c(Rλ ) − 1 rather than c(Rλ ) (§2.7.2).
This weaker inequality is the one that is used in (3.2.5.3), so there is no problem.
4.3. Main result and consequences. We assume that char(k) = 0 in this section. The
definition of parabolic Verma modules is the same as in §3.3.
Theorem 4.3.1. Let λ be a partition with ℓ(λ) ≤ k and λn+1 ≤ n + d.
Set ν = (λ†1 , . . . , λ†n+d) and µ = (λ†n+d+1 , λ†n+d+2 , . . . ). Then:
(a) λ†n+d = λ†n+d+1 if and only if Nλk has a linear presentation as a U(g)-module.
(b) If λ†n+d = λ†n+d+1 , L(Nλk ) (notation of §2.2) is the first linear strand of a B-module M
with a compatible GL(E) × O(V )-action and which is uniquely determined by the fact
that it is generated in degree 0 with degree 1 relations, and satisfies
M0 = (det E)k ⊗ Sµ† (E) ⊗ S[((n+d)×k)\ν] (V ),
M1 = (det E)k ⊗ S(µ1 +1,µ2 ,µ3 ,... )† (E) ⊗ S[(k+1−νn+d ,k−νn+d−1,...,k−ν1)] (V ).
If furthermore λ1 ≤ d, then M ∼
= Mkλ† , and:
(c) L(Nλk ) is an acyclic linear complex and is a minimal free resolution of Mkλ† over B,
(d) R(Mkλ† ) is an acyclic linear complex and is a minimal free resolution of Nλk over U(g).
The action of g on this complex extends to an action of spo(Ve ) and each R(Mkλ† )i is a
direct sum of parabolic Verma modules.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Theorem 3.3.2.
28
STEVEN V SAM
Conjecture 4.3.2. Let Iλ be the ideal generated by Sλ (E)⊗S[λ] (V ) in B. Then the resolution
of Iλ is a representation of spo(Ve ). Furthermore, each linear strand is irreducible if dim(V )
is odd and otherwise is a sum of 2 irreducible representations which are interchanged by the
outer automorphism of spo(Ve ) (this is related to the conjugation action of O(V ) on SO(V )).
Now we derive a few consequences of Theorem 4.3.1.
First, we begin with an alternative construction of Mkν . Consider OGr(n, V ) with vector
bundles η = E ⊗ R∗ , and Vνk = (det E)k ⊗ (det R∗ )k ⊗ S[(d×k)\ν] (R⊥ /R).
Proposition 4.3.3. Mkν = H0 (IGr(n, V ); Sym(η) ⊗ Vνk ).
Proof. Similar to the proof of Proposition 3.3.4.
Define the following vector bundle on OGr(n, V ):
Eλν = Sλ (R⊥ ) ⊗ (det R∗ )k ⊗ S[(d×k)\ν] (R⊥ /R).
Corollary 4.3.4. Let Fν• be the minimal free resolution of Mkν over A. We have
M
M
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ Eλν† ) ⊗ A(−i − j).
Fνi =
Hj (OGr(n, V );
j≥0
|λ|=i+j
λ⊆n×(n+2d+d′ )
Proof. Similar to the proof of Corollary 3.3.5.
Theorem 4.3.5. Let ν ⊆ (k d ) and λ ⊆ n × (n + 2d + d′ ) be partitions and let R be the
tautological subbundle on OGr(n, V ).
(a) If k ≥ ℓ(λ), then Hi (OGr(n, V ); Eλν† ) = 0 for all i > 0.
(b) The cohomology of Eλν† vanishes unless τ2k (λ) = µ is defined, in which case the cohomology is nonzero only in degree ι2k (λ) = i, and we have an O(V )-equivariant isomorphism
Hi (OGr(n, V ); E ν† ) ∼
= H0 (OGr(n, V ); E ν† ).
λ
µ
Proof. Similar to the proof of Theorem 3.3.6.
Remark 4.3.6. As in §4.1, we interpret A as the coordinate ring of the space of linear maps
E → V ∗ and hence it makes sense to talk about the generic map with respect to A, i.e.,
picking bases for E and V ∗ , the matrix entries are the variables of A. Similar comments
apply to B. The ideal
minors in B of this generic matrix is generated by
V
V of maximal
V
n
(E) ⊗ S[1n ] (V ) = n (E) ⊗ n (V ). When ν = (k d ), (4.1.4) becomes
M
Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ] (V ),
Mk(kd ) =
λ, λn ≥k
which is the kth power of the maximal minors in B (use Proposition 4.1.2(c)).
Corollary 4.3.7. Pick ν ⊆ (k d ). If k ≥ n, then the minimal free resolution of Mkν over A
is linear.
Proof. Combine Corollary 4.3.4 and Theorem 4.3.5(a).
Proposition 4.3.8. Choose a partition ν ⊆ (k d ). The support variety of Mkν is reduced and
is the variety of symmetric matrices in Sym2 (E) of rank ≤ 2k.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Proposition 3.3.9.
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
29
Remark 4.3.9. When d = 0, the line bundle det R∗ on OGr(n, V ) has a unique square root
L, so it is possible to take powers (det R∗ )k where k ∈ 21 Z, and we can define V k = V∅k . The
results of this section should mostly hold without change, but the full details of some of the
results we cite are not written down when k ∈
/ Z, so we omit explaining this case in detail.
The modules we get this way are submodules of the “Littlewood spinor module” studied in
[SW, §3], and can be thought of as half-integer powers of the ideal of maximal minors.
5. Variety of complexes
A
In this section, we use τ2k and ι2k to mean τ2k
and ιA
2k (see §2.7.4). Given a vector
space V and partitions λ, µ with ℓ(λ) + ℓ(µ) ≤ dim(V ), let S[λ;µ] (V ) denote Sν (V ) where
ν = (λ1 , λ2 , . . . , −µ2 , −µ1 ) (if ℓ(λ) + ℓ(µ) < dim(V ), there are 0’s in the . . . ).
5.1. Preliminaries. Let E and F be vector spaces of dimensions n and m and let V be a
vector space of dimension n + m + d (we assume d ≥ 0; some of the results below hold even
if d < 0, but we will not need them). Let A = Sym((E ⊗ V ∗ ) ⊕ (V ⊗ F ∗ )). Throughout, we
fix a decomposition dim(V ) = a + b where a ≥ n and b ≥ m. Using the trace invariant in
V ∗ ⊗ V , we have a GL(E) × GL(V ) × GL(F )-equivariant inclusion
E ⊗ F ⊂ (E ⊗ V ∗ ) ⊗ (V ⊗ F ∗ ) ⊂ Sym2 ((E ⊗ V ∗ ) ⊕ (V ⊗ F ∗ )).
Let B = A/(E ⊗ F ∗ ) be the quotient of A by the ideal generated by E ⊗ F ∗ .
We have Spec(A) = Hom(E, V )×Hom(V, F ), and we can identify Spec(B) ⊂ Hom(E, V )×
Hom(V, F ) with the set of pairs (ϕ, ψ) such that ψϕ = 0.
Proposition 5.1.1. (a) B is an integral domain, i.e., the ideal generated by E⊗F ∗ is prime.
(b) As a representation of GL(E) × GL(V ) × GL(F ), we have
M
Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ;λ′ ] (V ∗ ) ⊗ Sλ′ (F ∗ ).
B≈
ℓ(λ)≤n
ℓ(λ′ )≤m
(c) Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ;λ′ ] (V ∗ ) ⊗ Sλ′ (F ∗ ) is in the ideal generated by Sµ (E) ⊗ S[µ;µ′ ] (V ∗ ) ⊗ Sµ′ (F ∗ )
if and only if λ ⊇ µ.
(d) Two closed points (ϕ, ψ) and (ϕ′ , ψ ′ ) in Spec(B) are in the same GL(E) × GL(V ) ×
GL(F ) orbit if and only if rank(ϕ) = rank(ϕ′ ) and rank(ψ) = rank(ψ ′ ). Each orbit
closure is a normal variety with rational singularities. In particular, they are Cohen–
Macaulay varieties.
(e) The ideal (E ⊗ F ∗ ) is generated by a regular sequence. In particular, B is a complete
intersection and is a Koszul algebra.
Proof. The proofs of (a), (b), (d), and (e) are similar to the proofs of the corresponding
statements in Proposition 3.1.2. The desingularization in [SW] should be replaced with the
bundle η on X mentioned directly below. The reader is also encouraged to see [DS] for
the general situation of complexes with more than 2 maps. (c) follows from the analogous
statement for A [DEP, Corollary 4.2].
Remark 5.1.2. Part (e) of Proposition 5.1.1 also holds if dim(V ) = dim(E) + dim(F ) − 1.
One difference is that it has 2 irreducible components whose general points are pairs (ϕ, ψ)
where either ϕ or ψ has full rank and the other has corank 1.
30
STEVEN V SAM
Let X = Flag(n, n + d, V ) be the partial flag variety of subspaces Rn ⊂ Rn+d ⊂ V
where the subscript indicates the dimension. It has a tautological flag of vector bundles
Rn ⊂ Rn+d ⊂ V × X.
Set η = (E ⊗ R∗n ) ⊕ ((V /Rn+d ) ⊗ F ∗ ). Pick k, ℓ ≥ 0 and partitions ν ⊆ (k a ), ν ′ ⊆ (ℓb ). Set
ν = (k − νa , . . . , k − ν1 , ν1′ − ℓ, . . . , νb′ − ℓ).
Define
k,ℓ
k
∗ k
∗
ℓ
∗ ℓ
Vν,ν
′ = (det E) ⊗ (det Rn ) ⊗ Sν ((Rn+d /Rn ) ) ⊗ (det V /Rn+d ) ⊗ (det F ) .
k,ℓ
Proposition 5.1.3. The higher sheaf cohomology groups of Sym(η) ⊗ Vν,ν
′ vanish and
M
k,ℓ
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ S((kn )+λ,ν,−ℓ−µm ,...,−ℓ−µ1 ) (V ∗ ) ⊗ S(ℓm )+µ (F ∗ ).
H0 (X; Sym(η) ⊗ Vν,ν
′) ≈
ℓ(λ)≤n
ℓ(µ)≤m
Proof. Similar to Proposition 3.1.4, but use Theorem 2.5.3.
We define
(5.1.4)
k,ℓ
0
Mk,ℓ
ν,ν ′ = H (Flag(n, n + d, V ); Sym(η) ⊗ Vν,ν ′ )
M
≈
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ S((kn )+λ,ν,−ℓ−µm ,...,−ℓ−µ1 ) (V ∗ ) ⊗ S(ℓm )+µ (F ∗ ).
ℓ(λ)≤n
ℓ(µ)≤m
So Mk,ℓ
ν,ν ′ is an A-module. In fact, the scheme-theoretic image of Spec(Sym(η)) → Spec(A)
is Spec(B), so Mk,ℓ
ν,ν ′ is also a B-module.
The following result is the variety of complexes version of the main result of this paper.
A more detailed version of this theorem is contained in Theorem 5.3.1.
Theorem 5.1.5. Assume char(k) = 0. The minimal free resolution of Mk,ℓ
ν,ν ′ over B is linear.
Let Ve be a Z/2-graded space (from now on, superspace) with Ve0 = E ⊕ F and Ve1 = V .
We have a Z-grading on gl(Ve ) supported on [−2, 2] (we use the symbol ⊕ to separate the
different pieces of this grading):
(E ⊗ F ∗ ) ⊕ (E ⊗ V ∗ + V ⊗ F ∗ ) ⊕ (gl(E) × gl(V ) × gl(F )) ⊕ (E ∗ ⊗ V + V ∗ ⊗ F ) ⊕ (E ∗ ⊗ F ).
Let g be the positive part of this grading, i.e.,
g = (E ∗ ⊗ V + V ∗ ⊗ F ) ⊕ (E ∗ ⊗ F ).
Then E ∗ ⊗ F is central in g. For (e ⊗ v, ϕ ⊗ f ), (e′ ⊗ v ′ , ϕ′ ⊗ f ′ ) ∈ E ∗ ⊗ V + V ∗ ⊗ F , we have
[(e ⊗ v, ϕ ⊗ f ), (e′ ⊗ v ′ , ϕ′ ⊗ f ′ )] = ϕ′ (v)e ⊗ f ′ + ϕ(v ′ )e′ ⊗ f.
So Proposition 2.2.3 implies the following:
Proposition 5.1.6. The Koszul dual of B is the universal enveloping algebra U(g).
Choose a decomposition V = V a ⊕ V b where dim(V a ) = a and dim(V b ) = b (recall that
a ≥ n and b ≥ m). Let u = (E|V a )∗ ⊗ (F |V b ) ⊂ gl(Ve ). It inherits a Z-grading:
u0 = V a∗ ⊗ V b ,
u1 = (E ∗ ⊗ V b ) ⊕ (V a∗ ⊗ F ),
u2 = E ∗ ⊗ F.
Let g′ ⊂ gl(Ve ) be the subalgebra generated by u and g. Then it also has a Z-grading:
g′0 = V a∗ ⊗ V b ,
g′1 = (E ∗ ⊗ V ) ⊕ (V ∗ ⊗ F ),
g′2 = E ∗ ⊗ F.
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
31
Lemma 5.1.7. We have the following two exact sequences of Lie superalgebras
0 → g → g′ → V a∗ ⊗ V b → 0,
∗
0 → u → g′ → (E ∗ ⊗ V a ) ⊕ (V b ⊗ F ) → 0.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Lemma 3.1.8.
5.2. Howe duality. In this section, we assume that char(k) = 0.
Let U be a (k + ℓ)-dimensional vector space. Then GL(U) × gl(Ve ) acts on the space
U = Sym(((E|V a )∗ ⊗ U ∗ ) ⊕ (U ⊗ (F |V b )))
extending the obvious action of GL(U) × gl(E|V a ) × gl(F |V b ) [CLZ, §3.1].
Let λ, λ′ be partitions with ℓ(λ) + ℓ(λ′ ) ≤ k + ℓ and such that λm+1 ≤ b and λ′n+1 ≤ a.
k,ℓ
Let Nλ,λ
′ be the S[λ;λ′ ] (U)-isotypic component of U with respect to the action of GL(U).
We need some of the following facts about the action of GL(U) × gl(Ve ) (we will not use
unitarizability, and hence do not define it; we state it only for completeness):
Theorem 5.2.1. Let λ, λ′ be partitions with ℓ(λ) + ℓ(λ′ ) ≤ k + ℓ such that λm+1 ≤ b
k,ℓ
and λ′n+1 ≤ a. Then Nλ,λ
′ is an irreducible, unitarizable, lowest-weight representation of
k,ℓ
k,ℓ
′
′
∼
gl(Ve ). We have Nλ,λ′ = Nµ,µ
′ if and only if λ = µ and λ = µ . As a representation of
GL(U) × gl(Ve ), we have a direct sum decomposition
M
k,ℓ
S[λ;λ′ ] (U) ⊗ Nλ,λ
U = Sym(((E|V a )∗ ⊗ U ∗ ) ⊕ (U ⊗ (F |V b ))) =
′.
ℓ(λ)+ℓ(λ′ )≤k+ℓ
λm+1 ≤b
λ′n+1 ≤a
Proof. See [CLZ, Theorem 3.3].
Theorem 5.2.2. We have a gl(E) × gl(V a ) × gl(V b ) × gl(F )-equivariant isomorphism
M
U(u)
k,ℓ
k,ℓ
∼
Sα′ ((E|V a )∗ ) ⊗ Sα (F |V b ) ⊗ L
Hi (u; Nλ,λ
(Nλ,λ
′ , k) =
′ ) = Tori
(α,α′ )
τk+ℓ (α,α′ )=(λ,λ′ )
ιk+ℓ (α,α′ )=i
∗
where L = (det E ∗ )k ⊗ (det V a )k ⊗ (det V b )ℓ ⊗ (det F )ℓ .
Proof. See [CKW, Theorem 5.7]. Their notation does not match ours, so alternatively one
can use [SSW, §5] (see proof of Theorem 3.2.2 for comments). The choice of L is not
k,ℓ
e
unique: one can twist the action of gl(Ve ) on Nλ,λ
′ by the supertrace character det V =
(det E) ⊗ (det V a )∗ ⊗ (det V b )∗ ⊗ (det F ) which does not affect any of its essential properties;
[CKW] uses L ⊗ (det Ve )−ℓ instead of L.
Proposition 5.2.3. Let λ, λ′ be partitions such that ℓ(λ) + ℓ(λ′ ) ≤ k + ℓ, λm+1 ≤ b, and
λ′n+1 ≤ a. Set ν = (λ†1 , . . . , λ†b ) and µ = (λ†b+1 , λ†b+2 , . . . ) and similarly, set ν ′ = (λ′ †1 , . . . , λ′†a )
and µ = (λ′ †a+1 , λ′ †a+2 , . . . ). Then
k,ℓ
∗
ℓ
∗ k
H0 (g; Nλ,λ
′ ) = (det E ) ⊗ Sµ′ † (E ) ⊗ (det F ) ⊗ Sµ† (F ) ⊗ S[(k a )\ν ′ ;(ℓb )\ν] (V )
k,ℓ
∗ k
∗
ℓ
′
H1 (g; Nλ,λ
b
(V )
′ ) = (det E ) ⊗ S(ν ′ +1,µ′ ,µ′ ,... )† (E ) ⊗ (det F ) ⊗ Sµ† (F ) ⊗ S[(k−µ′ +1,k−ν ′
a
2 3
1
a−1 ,...,k−ν1 );(ℓ )\ν]
⊕(det E ∗ )k ⊗ Sµ′ † (E ∗ ) ⊗ (det F )ℓ ⊗ S(νb ,µ2 ,µ3 ,... )† (F ) ⊗ S[(ka )\ν ′ ;ℓ−µ1 +1,ℓ−νb−1 ,...,ℓ−ν1 ] (V ).
32
STEVEN V SAM
k,ℓ
In particular, as a U(g)-module, Nλ,λ
′ is generated in a single degree and has relations of
†
†
degree λb − λb+1 + 1 and relations of degree λ′ †a − λ′ †a+1 + 1.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Proposition 3.2.3.
Proposition 5.2.4. Let λ, λ′ be partitions such that ℓ(λ) + ℓ(λ′ ) ≤ k + ℓ and λ′1 ≤ a − n
k,ℓ
and λ1 ≤ b − m. Then Nλ,λ
′ has a linear free resolution over U(g). As a representation of
k,ℓ
GL(E) × GL(V ) × GL(F ), Hi (g; Nλ,λ
′ ) is a subrepresentation of
M
S(kn )+γ ′ (E ∗ ) ⊗ S[((kn )+γ ′ ,k−λ′ † ,...,k−λ′ † );((ℓm )+γ,ℓ−λ† ,...,ℓ−λ† )] (V ) ⊗ S(ℓm )+γ (F ).
|γ|+|γ ′ |=i
ℓ(γ)≤m
ℓ(γ ′ )≤n
a−n
1
b−m
1
Proof. The proof of the first part is similar to the proof of Proposition 3.2.4. See also the
comments in the proof of Proposition 5.2.3. The proof of the second part is similar to the
proof of Corollary 3.2.6.
5.3. Main result and consequences. We assume that char(k) = 0 in this section. The
definition of parabolic Verma modules is the same as in §3.3.
Theorem 5.3.1. Let λ, λ′ be partitions with ℓ(λ)+ℓ(λ′ ) ≤ k +ℓ and λm+1 ≤ b and λ′n+1 ≤ a.
Set ν = (λ†1 , . . . , λ†b ), µ = (λ†b+1 , λ†b+2 , . . . ), ν ′ = (λ′ †1 , . . . , λ′ †a ), and µ′ = (λ′ †a+1 , λ′ †a+2 , . . . ).
Then:
k,ℓ
(a) λ†b = λ†b+1 and λ′ †a = λ′ †a+1 if and only if Nλ,λ
′ has a linear presentation as a U(g)-module.
†
†
k,ℓ
′†
′†
(b) If λb = λb+1 and λ a = λ a+1 , then L(Nλ,λ′ ) (notation of §2.2) is the first linear strand
of a B-module M with a compatible GL(E) × GL(V ) × GL(F )-action and which is
uniquely determined by the fact that it is generated in degree 0 with degree 1 relations,
and satisfies
M0 = (det E)k ⊗ Sµ′ † (E) ⊗ (det F ∗ )ℓ ⊗ Sµ† (F ∗ ) ⊗ S[(ka )\ν ′ ;(ℓb )\ν] (V ∗ ),
∗
′
M1 = ((det E)k ⊗ S(νa′ +1,µ′2 ,µ′3 ,... )† (E) ⊗ (det F ∗ )ℓ ⊗ Sµ† (F ∗ ) ⊗ S[(k−µ′1 +1,k−νa−1
,...,k−ν1′ );(ℓb )\ν] (V ))
⊕((det E)k ⊗ Sµ′ † (E) ⊗ (det F ∗ )ℓ ⊗ S(νb +1,µ2 ,µ3 ,... )† (F ∗ ) ⊗ S[(ka )\ν ′ ;ℓ−µ1 +1,ℓ−νb−1 ,...,ℓ−ν1] (V ∗ )).
k,ℓ
If furthermore λ′1 ≤ a − n and λ1 ≤ b − m, then M ∼
= Mλ′ † ,λ† , and:
k,ℓ
k,ℓ
(c) L(Nλ,λ
′ ) is an acyclic linear complex and is a minimal free resolution of M ′ † † over B,
λ ,λ
k,ℓ
(d) R(Mk,ℓ
) is an acyclic linear complex and is a minimal free resolution of Nλ,λ
′ over
λ′ † ,λ†
U(g). The action of g on this complex extends to an action of gl(Ve ) and each R(Mk,ℓ′† † )i
is a direct sum of parabolic Verma modules.
λ ,λ
Proof. Similar to the proof of Theorem 3.3.2.
Conjecture 5.3.2. Let Iλ,λ′ be the ideal generated by Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ;λ′ ] (V ∗ ) ⊗ Sλ′ (F ∗ ) in B.
Then the resolution of Iλ,λ′ is a representation of gl(Ve ) and each linear strand is irreducible.
We now derive a few consequences of Theorem 5.3.1. Recall that ν = (k − νa , . . . , k −
ν1 , ν1′ − ℓ, . . . , νb′ − ℓ). Define
′
ν,ν
∗
ℓ
∗
∗ k
Eλ,λ
′ = (det Rn ) ⊗ Sν ((Rn+d /R) ) ⊗ (det V /Rn+d ) ⊗ Sλ† ((V /Rn ) ) ⊗ Sλ′ † (Rn+d ).
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
33
Proposition 5.3.3. Let Fν,ν
be the minimal free resolution of Mk,ℓ
•
ν,ν ′ over A. We have
M
M
′
′
∗
m
′
=
Hj (Flag(n, n + d, V );
Fν,ν
S(kn )+λ (E) ⊗ Eλν,ν
† ,λ′ † ⊗ S(ℓ )+λ (F )) ⊗ A(−i − j).
i
′
|λ|+|λ′ |=i+j
λ⊆n×(m+d)
λ′ ⊆m×(n+d)
j≥0
Proof. Similar to the proof of Corollary 3.3.5. In the notation of §2.4, we have ε = ((E ⊗
V ∗ ) ⊕ (V ⊗ F ∗ )) ⊗ OFlag(n,n+d,V ) and ξ = (E ⊗ (V /Rn )∗ ) ⊕ (Rn+d ⊗ F ∗ ).
Theorem 5.3.4. Let ν ⊆ (k a ) and ν ′ ⊆ (ℓb ) be partitions. Also pick partitions λ ⊆ n×(m+d)
and λ′ ⊆ m × (n + d). Let Rn ⊂ Rn+d be the tautological flag on Flag(n, n + d, V ).
′
(a) If k + ℓ ≥ ℓ(λ) + ℓ(λ′ ) − 1, then Hi (Flag(n, n + d, V ); Eλν,ν
† ,λ′ † ) = 0 for i > 0.
′
′
′
(b) The cohomology of Eλν,ν
† ,λ′ † vanishes unless τk+ℓ (λ, λ ) = (µ, µ ) is defined, in which case the
cohomology is nonzero only in degree ιk+ℓ (λ, λ′ ) = i, and we have a GL(V )-equivariant
isomorphism
′
ν,ν ′
Hi (Flag(n, n + d, V ); E ν,ν † ) ∼
= H0 (Flag(n, n + d, V ); E
† ).
λ† ,λ′
µ† ,µ′
Remark 5.3.5. As in §5.1, we interpret A as the coordinate ring of the space of pairs of
linear maps E → V and V → F and hence it makes sense to talk about the generic map
with respect to A, i.e., picking bases for E, V, F , the matrix entries are the variables of A.
Similar comments apply to B. When ν = (k a ) and ν ′ = (ℓb ), (5.1.4) becomes
M
Sλ (E) ⊗ S[λ;λ′ ] (V ∗ ) ⊗ Sλ′ (F ∗ ),
Mk,ℓ
=
a
b
(k ),(ℓ )
λ,λ′
λn ≥k
λ′m ≥ℓ
which is the product of the kth power of the maximal minors of E → V in B with the ℓth
power of the maximal minors of V → F (use Proposition 5.1.1(c)).
Corollary 5.3.6. Pick ν ⊆ (k a−n ) and ν ′ ⊆ (ℓb−m ). If k + ℓ ≥ n + m − 1, then the minimal
free resolution of Mk,ℓ
ν,ν ′ is linear over A.
Proof. Combine Proposition 5.3.3 and Theorem 5.3.4(a).
Proposition 5.3.7. Choose partitions ν ⊆ (k a−n ) and ν ′ ⊆ (ℓb−m ). The support variety of
Mk,ℓ
ν,ν ′ is reduced and is the variety of matrices in Hom(E, F ) of rank ≤ k + ℓ.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Proposition 3.3.9.
References
[ABW] Kaan Akin, David A. Buchsbaum, Jerzy Weyman, Resolutions of determinantal ideals: the submaximal minors, Adv. in Math. 39 (1981), no. 1, 1–30.
[AW1] Kaan Akin, Jerzy Weyman, Minimal free resolutions of determinantal ideals and irreducible representations of the Lie superalgebra gl(m|n), J. Algebra 197 (1997), no. 2, 559–583.
[AW2] Kaan Akin, Jerzy Weyman, The irreducible tensor representations of gl(m|1) and their generic
homology, J. Algebra 230 (2000), no. 1, 5–23.
[AW3] Kaan Akin, Jerzy Weyman, Primary ideals associated to the linear strands of Lascoux’s resolution
and syzygies of the corresponding irreducible representations of the Lie superalgebra gl(m|n), J.
Algebra 310 (2007), no. 2, 461–490.
[Av]
L. L. Avramov, Modules of finite virtual projective dimension, Invent. Math. 96 (1989), no. 1,
71–101.
34
[AB]
[BGS]
[Bo]
[BEH]
[Ch]
[CKL]
[CKW]
[CLZ]
[CW]
[DEP]
[DS]
[EN]
[Ei1]
[Ei2]
[Ei3]
[FH]
[GLP]
[H]
[Ja]
[JPW]
[Ka]
[Ke]
[L]
[M]
[N]
[PW]
[S1]
STEVEN V SAM
Luchezar L. Avramov, Ragnar-Olaf Buchweitz, Support varieties and cohomology over complete
intersections, Invent. Math. 142 (2000), no. 2, 285–318.
Alexander Beilinson, Victor Ginzburg, Wolfgang Soergel, Koszul duality patterns in representation
theory, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1996), no. 2, 473–527.
Giandomenico Boffi, The universal form of the Littlewood–Richardson rule, Adv. in Math. 68 (1988),
no. 1, 40–63.
Ragnar-Olaf Buchweitz, David Eisenbud, Jürgen Herzog, Cohen-Macaulay modules on quadrics,
Singularities, representation of algebras, and vector bundles (Lambrecht, 1985), 58–116, Lecture
Notes in Math. 1273, Springer, Berlin, 1987.
Marc Chardin, Powers of ideals: Betti numbers, cohomology and regularity, Commutative algebra,
317–333, Springer, New York, 2013.
Shun-Jen Cheng, Jae-Hoon Kwon, Ngau Lam, A BGG-type resolution for tensor modules over
general linear superalgebra, Lett. Math. Phys. 84 (2008), no. 1, 75–87, arXiv:0801.0914v2.
Shun-Jen Cheng, Jae-Hoon Kwon, Weiqiang Wang, Kostant homology formulas for oscillator modules of Lie superalgebras, Adv. Math. 224 (2010), no. 4, 1548–1588, arXiv:0901.0247v2.
Shun-Jen Cheng, Ngau Lam, R. B. Zhang, Character formula for infinite dimensional unitarizable
modules of the general linear superalgebra, J. Algebra 273 (2004), 780–805, arXiv:math/0301183v1.
Shun-Jen Cheng, Weiqiang Wang, Dualities and Representations of Lie Superalgebras, Graduate
Studies in Mathematics 144, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012.
C. De Concini, David Eisenbud, C. Procesi, Young diagrams and determinantal varieties, Invent.
Math. 56 (1980), no. 2, 129–165.
Corrado De Concini, Elisabetta Strickland, On the variety of complexes, Adv. in Math. 41 (1981),
no. 1, 57–77.
J. A. Eagon, D. G. Northcott, Ideals defined by matrices and a certain complex associated with
them, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 269 (1962), 188–204.
David Eisenbud, Homological algebra on a complete intersection, with an application to group
representations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 260 (1980), no. 1, 35–64.
David Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in
Mathematics 150, Springer-Verlag, 1995.
David Eisenbud, The Geometry of Syzygies. A second course in commutative algebra and algebraic
geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 229, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005.
William Fulton, Joe Harris, Representation Theory: A First Course, Graduate Texts in Mathematics
129, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
L. Gruson, R. Lazarsfeld, C. Peskine, On a theorem of Castelnuovo, and the equations defining space
curves, Invent. Math. 72 (1983), no. 3, 491–506.
Roger Howe, Perspectives on invariant theory: Schur duality, multiplicity-free actions and beyond,
Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings 8, 1995.
Jens Carsten Jantzen, Representations of Algebraic Groups, second edition, Mathematical Surveys
and Monographs 107, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003.
T. Józefiak, P. Pragacz, J. Weyman, Resolutions of determinantal varieties and tensor complexes
associated with symmetric and antisymmetric matrices, Young tableaux and Schur functors in algebra
and geometry (Toruń, 1980), 109–189, Astérisque, 87-88, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1981.
V. G. Kac, Some remarks on nilpotent orbits, J. Algebra 64 (1980), no. 1, 190–213.
George Kempf, On the geometry of a theorem of Riemann, Ann. of Math. (2) 98 (1973), 178–185.
Stephen Lovett, Resolutions of orthogonal and symplectic analogues of determinantal ideals, J.
Algebra 311 (2007), no. 1, 282–298.
I. G. Macdonald, Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, second edition, Oxford Mathematical
Monographs, Oxford, 1995.
D. G. Northcott, Finite Free Resolutions, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 71, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York-Melbourne, 1976.
Piotr Pragacz, Jerzy Weyman, Complexes associated with trace and evaluation. Another approach
to Lascoux’s resolution, Adv. in Math. 57 (1985), no. 2, 163–207.
Steven V Sam, Schubert complexes and degeneracy loci, J. Algebra 337 (2011), 103–125,
arXiv:1006.5514v2.
ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS AND COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
[S2]
35
Steven V Sam, Symmetric quivers, invariant theory, and saturation theorems for the classical groups,
Adv. Math. 229 (2012), no. 2, 1104–1135, arXiv:1009.3040v2.
[S3]
Steven V Sam, Derived supersymmetries of determinantal varieties, J. Commut. Algebra 6 (2014),
no. 2, 261–286, arXiv:1207.3309v1.
[S4]
Steven V Sam, Homology of analogues of Heisenberg Lie algebras, Math. Res. Lett. 22 (2015), no. 4,
1223–1241, arXiv:1307.1901v1.
[S5]
Steven V Sam, Supplement to Orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras, Koszul duality, and a complete intersection analogue of the Eagon–Northcott complex, available as ancillary file at
http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2255.
[SS]
Steven V Sam, Andrew Snowden, Infinite rank spinor and oscillator representations,
arXiv:1604.06368v1.
[SSW] Steven V Sam, Andrew Snowden, Jerzy Weyman, Homology of Littlewood complexes, Selecta Math.
(N.S.) 19 (2013), no. 3, 655–698, arXiv:1209.3509v2.
[SW] Steven V Sam, Jerzy Weyman, Littlewood complexes and analogues of determinantal varieties, Int.
Math. Res. Not. (IMRN), no. 13, 4663–4707, arXiv:1303.0546v3.
[St]
John R. Stembridge, Multiplicity-free products and restrictions of Weyl characters, Represent. Theory 7 (2003), 404–439.
[Wei] Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 38, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
[Wey] Jerzy Weyman, Cohomology of Vector Bundles and Syzygies, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 149,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley
Current address: Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: http://math.wisc.edu/~svs/
| 0math.AC
|
Hyperplane Sections, Gröbner Bases, and Hough Transforms
Lorenzo Robbiano
arXiv:1305.0478v2 [math.AC] 23 Jun 2014
Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 35, I-16146 Genova, Italy
Abstract
Along the lines of [6] and [8], the purpose of this paper is twofold. In the first part we concentrate
on hyperplane sections of algebraic schemes, and present results for determining when Gröbner
bases pass to the quotient and when they can be lifted. The main difficulty to overcome is the fact
that we deal with non-homogeneous ideals. As a by-product we hint at a promising technique
for computing implicitization efficiently.
In the second part of the paper we deal with families of algebraic schemes and the Hough
transforms, in particular we compute their dimension, and show that in some interesting cases it
is zero. Then we concentrate on their hyperplane sections. Some results and examples hint at
the possibility of reconstructing external and internal surfaces of human organs from the parallel
cross-sections obtained by tomography.
Keywords: Hyperplane Section, Gröbner basis, Family of schemes, Hough transform.
2010 MSC: 13P25, 13P10, 14D06
these days, even the most pure
and abstract mathematics
is in danger to be applied
(Anonymous)
Introduction
About 50 years ago the technique of Hough Transforms (HT for short) was introduced with
the purpose of recognizing special curves inside images (see [2]); it has subsequently become
widely used and generalized in many ways, notwithstanding the fact that its range of application
is rather limited. An extension was presented in [6] where the HT was introduced in the wider
context of families of algebraic schemes. This paved the way to detecting more complicated
objects, and offered the prospect of using algebraic geometry to help other scientists, in particular doctors, in the challenge of recognizing and reconstructing images from various types of
tomography.
In this paper we commence our investigation by considering hyperplane sections. It is wellknown how to use the DegRevLex term ordering to relate Gröbner bases of a homogenous ideal
to Gröbner bases of its quotient modulo a linear form (see Proposition 1.3). However, that result
Email address: [email protected] (Lorenzo Robbiano)
Preprint submitted to Elsevier
April 11, 2018
makes essential use of the homogeneity. Since we have in mind “inhomogeneous applications"
we develop a theory which works in the inhomogenous case. We prove Theorem 1.7 which
shows how Gröbner bases pass to the quotient, and Theorem 1.10 which establishes a criterion
for lifting Gröbner bases. A consequence of this result is Theorem 1.18 which describes a class of
instances where good liftings of Gröbner bases can be obtained. A confirmation of its usefulness
comes from some preliminary experiments on computing implicitizations (see Example 1.21).
The second section concentrates on families of schemes and Hough transforms. Given a
family of algebraic schemes, there is a non-empty Zariski open set over which the universal
reduced σ-Gröbner basis G specializes to the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of the fibers, hence we
get a parametrization of the fibers via the non-constant coefficients of G (see Proposition 2.10).
The scheme which parametrizes the fibers is called the σ-scheme, and from the theory of Gröbner
fans (see [9]) we deduce that each family has only a finite set of σ-schemes (see Corollary 2.13).
Subsection 2.2 applies the results about hyperplane sections to families of algebraic schemes.
After recalling our definition of HT (see Definition 2.22), we show how to compute its dimension. Proposition 2.25 and some examples illustrate some cases when the HTs are zerodimensional schemes. Finally, Example 2.28 shows how the equation of a surface can be reconstructed from the equations of some of its hyperplane sections. The important remark here is that
the equations of these curves can be obtained obtained using Hough transforms.
Why did we mention other scientists, in particular doctors? Suppose that special curves have
been recognized in the tomographic sections of a human organ. Our results hint at the possibility
of reconstructing a surface whose cross-sections coincide with the recognized curves. It could
be the contour of a vertebra or a kidney. However, more difficulties arise, in particular the fact
that in this context all the data are inexact. More investigation is needed which is exactly what
every researcher loves.
Assumptions 0.1. Throughout the paper we use notation and definitions introduced in [4]
and [5]. Moreover, we always assume that for every term ordering σ on Tn = T(x1 , . . . , xn )
we have x1 >σ · · · >σ xn , and we call σ̂i (or simply σ̂ if i is clear from the context) the restriction
of σ to the monoid T(x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xn ).
My warmest thanks go to J. Abbott, M. C. Beltrametti, M. Piana, M. L. Torrente. With them
I had the opportunity to share my ideas, and from them I received valuable feed-back.
Contents
1
2
Hyperplane Sections and Gröbner Bases
1.1 The Homogeneous Case . . . . . . .
1.2 The non-Homogeneous Case . . . . .
1.3 Lifting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.4 Common Lifting . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
3
3
4
5
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Families of Schemes and the Hough Transform
2.1 Families of Schemes . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Hyperplane Sections and Families . . . . .
2.3 The Hough Transform and its Dimension .
2.4 Hyperplane Sections and Hough Transforms
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
. 9
. 11
. 13
. 15
References
.
.
.
.
15
2
1. Hyperplane Sections and Gröbner Bases
In this section we conduct our investigation into hyperplane sections, and establish some
results about Gröbner bases. We recall several facts from the well-known homogeneous case and
confront them with new results for the inhomogenous case.
1.1. The Homogeneous Case
Assumptions 1.1. Let P = K[x1 , . . . , xn ], let i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, let c1 , . . . , ci−1 , ci+1 . . . cn ∈ K, and
P
let L = xi − ℓ be the linear polynomial with ℓ = j,i c j x j . We identify P/(L) with the ring
P̂ = K[x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xn ] via the isomorphism defined by πL (xi ) = ℓ, πL (x j ) = x j for j , i.
Definition 1.2. For t = xa11 xa22 · · · xann we write ai = log xi (t). For i ∈ {1, . . . , n} we say that a term
ordering σ is of xi -DegRev type if it is degree-compatible, and for every pair of terms t, t′ ∈ Tn
which satisfy deg(t) = deg(t′ ) and logxi (t) < logxi (t′ ), then t >σ t′ .
The usual DegRevLex ordering is of xn -DegRev type, and by suitably modifying its definition
we see that for every i there exist term orderings of xi -DegRev type. For an in-depth analysis of
this topic see [5, Section 4.4].
We observe that πL = ̺ ◦ θ where θ : P −→ P is defined by θ(xi ) = xi + ℓ, θ(x j ) = x j for
j , i while ̺ : P −→ P̂ is defined by ̺(xi ) = 0, ̺(x j ) = x j for j , i.
Proposition 1.3. (Homogeneous Hyperplane Sections)
Under Assumptions 1.1, we let let σ be a term ordering of xi -DegRev type on P, let I be a
homogeneous ideal in P, and let G = {G1 , . . . , G s } be the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of θ(I). Then
̺(G) = {̺(G1 ), . . . , ̺(G s )} \ {0} is the reduced σ̂-Gröbner basis of πL (I).
Proof. First of all we observe that θ is a graded isomorphism, so that θ(I) is a homogeneous
ideal. Consequently the claim follows from a classical result in Gröbner basis theory (see for
instance [5, Corollary 4.4.18]).
The following examples illustrate this proposition.
Example 1.4. Let P = K[x, y, z, w], let I = (z2 − xw, x2 y−zw2 ), let ℓ = 3y+w, and let L = z−ℓ =
z − 3y − w. We consider the linear change of coordinates θ which sends z to z + ℓ = z + 3y + w, and
x to x, y to y, w to w. Then θ(I) = (9y2 − xw + 6yw + w2 + 6yz + 2zw + z2 , x2 y − 3yw2 − w3 − zw2 ).
Let σ be a term ordering of z-DegRev type. The reduced σ-Gröbner basis of θ(I) is
G = { y2 − 19 xw + 23 yw + 19 w2 + 23 yz + 92 wz + 91 z2 ,
x2 y − 3yw2 − w3 − w2 z,
x3 w − x2 w2 − 3xw3 − 9yw3 − 3w4 − 2x2 wz − 9yw2 z − 6w3 z − x2 z2 − 3w2 z2 }
If we mod out z we get
̺(G) = { y2 − 19 xw + 23 yw + 19 w2 ,
x2 y − 3yw2 − w3 ,
x3 w − x2 w2 − 3xw3 − 9yw3 − 3w4 }
On the other hand, if ̺ is defined by ̺(x) = x, ̺(y) = y, ̺(w) = w, ̺(z) = 0, and we put πL = ̺ ◦ θ
we have πL (I) = (9y2 − xw + 6yw + w2 , x2 y − 3yw2 − w3 ). If we compute the σ̂-reduced Gröbner
basis of πL (I) we get ̺(G), as prescribed by the proposition.
3
Example 1.5. Let P = K[x0 , x1 , x2 , x3 ], let F1 = x33 − x1 x2 x0 , F2 = x32 − x1 x3 x0 − x2 x20 , F3 =
x21 x2 − x3 x20 , let I = (F1 , F2 , F3 ), and let σ be a term ordering of x0 -DegRev type. The reduced
Gröbner basis of I is (F1 , F2 , F3 , F4 ) where f4 = x31 x3 x0 − x22 x3 x20 + x3 x40 . If we mod out x0 we
get πL (F1 ) = x33 , πL (F2 ) = x32 , πL (F3 ) = x21 x2 , πL (F4 ) = 0. The reduced Gröbner basis of πL (I)
is (πL (F1 ), πL (F2 ), πL (F3 )). We have to take out πL (F4 ) = 0.
1.2. The non-Homogeneous Case
The main feature of the homogeneous case is that if σ is a term ordering of xi -DegRev type
and F is a non zero homogeneous polynomial, then xi | F if and only if xi | LTσ (F). This fact
implies that in Proposition 1.3 it suffices to remove 0 from the set {̺(G1 ), . . . , ̺(G s )}, and get the
reduced Gröbner basis of πL (I) (see for instance Example 1.5). Even if σ is a term ordering of
xi -DegRev type, in the non homogeneous case it may happen that xi divides LTσ ( f ) but xi does
not divide f . For instance, if f = x2 − y and σ is any degre-compatible term ordering then x
divides x2 = LTσ ( f ), but it does not divide f . These observations lead to a different approach
of the hyperplane section problem in the non homogeneous case. In particular, Assumptions 1.1
are modified as follows.
Assumptions 1.6. Let P = K[x1 , . . . , xn ], let i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, let ci+1 , . . . , cn , γ ∈ K, and let
P
L = xi − ℓ be the linear polynomial with ℓ = j>i c j x j + γ if i < n , and ℓ = γ if i = n. We identify
P/(L) with the ring P̂ = K[x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xn ] via the isomorphism defined by πL (xi ) = ℓ,
πL (x j ) = x j for j , i.
Theorem 1.7. (Hyperplane Sections)
Let σ be a term ordering on Tn and, under Assumptions 1.6, let I be an ideal in the polynomial
ring P, let G = {g1 , . . . , g s } be a monic σ-Gröbner basis of I, and let LTσ (g j ) = LTσ̂ (πL (g j )) for
every j = 1, . . . , s.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
The linear polynomial L does not divide zero modulo I.
The set πL (G) = {πL (g1 ), . . . , πL (g s )} is a σ̂-Gröbner basis of πL (I).
If G is minimal, then also πL (G) is minimal.
If L = xi − γ and G is the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of I, then πL (G) is the reduced
σ̂-Gröbner basis of πL (I).
Proof. To prove (a) we assume, for contradiction, that L is a zero divisor modulo I. Let F be
a non-zero monic polynomial with minimal leading term such that FL ∈ I. The assumption
that LTσ (g j ) = LTσ̂ (πL (g j )) for every j = 1, . . . , s implies that xi does not divide any LTσ (gi ).
Therefore from LTσ (L) = xi we deduce that there exist ℓ ∈ {1, . . . , s} and a monic polynomial
H ∈ P with LTσ (F) = LTσ (H) LTσ (gℓ ). Then (F − Hgℓ )L ∈ I and LTσ (F − Hgℓ ) <σ LTσ (F), a
contradiction.
Next we prove (b). It is clear that πL (G) generates πL (I), hence we need to prove that for every
non-zero element f of πL (I) its leading term LTσ̂ ( f ) is divided by the leading term of an element
of πL (G). For contradiction, suppose that there exists a non-zero monic element f ∈ πL (I) such
that LTσ̂ ( f ) is not divided by any leading term of the elements of πL (G), and let F ∈ I be a nonzero monic polynomial with minimal leading term such that πL (F) = f . A priori there are two
possibilities: either xi | LTσ (F) or xi ∤ LTσ (F). If xi | LTσ (F) there exist an index j ∈ {1, . . . , s}
and a term t ∈ Ti such that we have LTσ (F) = xi · t · LTσ (g j ). We let H = F − L · t · g j and
observe that πL (H) = πL (F) = f , since πL (L) = 0. On the other hand, LTσ (H) <σ LTσ (F)
which contradicts the minimality of F. So this case is excluded and hence xi ∤ LTσ (F). Since πL
4
substitutes xi with a linear polynomial whose support contains only terms which are σ-smaller
than xi , we deduce that LTσ (F) = LTσ̂ ( f ). Since there exists j such that LTσ (g j ) | LTσ (F), we
deduce that LTσ̂ (πL (g j )) | LTσ̂ ( f ), a contradiction.
Claim (c) follows from (b) and the fact that the leading terms of the elements of both bases
are the same.
Finally we prove (d). Let t be a power product in the support of πL (g j ) − LTσ̂ (πL (g j )). If
t = πL (t) with t in the support of gg − LTσ (g j ), then t is not a multiple of any LTσ (g j ), hence
of any LTσ (πL (g j )). If t = γ1a πL (xai t) with xai t in the support of gg − LTσ (g j ), then xai t is not a
multiple of any LTσ (g j ), hence t is not a multiple of any LTσ (g j ), and so t is not a multiple of
any LTσ (πL (g j )) as well.
In the theorem, the assumption that LTσ (g j ) = LTσ̂ (πL (g j )) for every j = 1, . . . , s is essential,
as the following example shows.
Example 1.8. Let P = K[x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ], let f1 = x2 x3 − x4 , f2 = x31 −2x23 , let I = ( f1 , f2 ), and let σ
be any degree-compatible term ordering. Then ( f1 , f2 ) is the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of I. If we
substitute x1 with x3 + x4 , and let f2′ be the polynomial obtained from f2 with this substitution,
then the reduced DegRevLex-Gröbner basis is ( f1 , f2′ , f3 ) which differs from ( f1 , f2′ ) since it
includes the new polynomial f3 = x2 x34 + x23 x4 + 3x3 x24 + 3x34 − 2x3 x4 .
In particular, the fact that LTσ (g j ) = LTσ̂ (πL (g j )) for j = 1, . . . , s if and only if xi does not
divide any leading term of the elements of G, is essential in the proof that minimality of G implies
minimality of πL (G). However, for a general L the conclusion of statement (d) of the theorem
does not hold, as the following example shows.
Example 1.9. The set G = {x32 − x21 , x23 − 1} is the reduced σ-Gröbner basis for every degreecompatible term ordering σ with x1 >σ x2 >σ x3 , but if L = x1 − x3 then πL (G) = {x32 − x23 , x23 −1}
is not reduced.
1.3. Lifting
We are going to prove a sort of converse of Theorem 1.7.
Theorem 1.10. (Lifting Gröbner Bases)
Let σ be a term ordering on Tn and, under Assumptions 1.6, let I be an ideal in P such that L
does not divide zero modulo I, let G = {g1 , . . . , g s } ⊂ I be such that πL (G) = {πL (g1 ), . . . , πL (g s)}
is a σ̂-Gröbner basis of πL (I), and LTσ (g j ) = LTσ̂ (πL (g j )) for j = 1, . . . , s.
(a) The set G is a σ-Gröbner basis of I.
(b) If πL (G) is minimal, then also G is minimal.
(c) If L = xi − γ and πL (G) is the reduced σ̂-Gröbner basis of πL (I), then G is the reduced
σ-Gröbner basis of I.
Proof. We prove (a) by contradiction. Suppose that there exists a monic non-zero polynomial
F ∈ I with minimal leading term among the polynomials in I such that LTσ (F) is not divisible
by any leading term of the elements of G, and let f = πL (F). If f = 0 then there exists H ∈ P
with F = HL, and the assumption about L implies that H ∈ I. Moreover LTσ (H) | LTσ (F), a
contradiction. Therefore f = 0 is excluded, hence there exist suitable polynomials h j ∈ P̂ such
P
that f can be written as f = sj=1 h j πL (g j ) with LTσ̂ ( f ) = max sj=1 {LTσ̂ (h j πL (g j ))}. If we let
5
P
P
U = F − sj=1 h j g j , we get πL (U) = f − sj=1 h j πL (g j ) = 0. Consequently there exists H ∈ P with
U = HL and the assumption about L implies that H ∈ I. We examine the two possible cases.
P
Case 1: H = 0. In this case F = sj=1 h j g j . We know that LTσ̂ ( f ) = maxsj=1 {LTσ̂ (h j πL (g j )},
hence there exists at least one index ℓ such that LTσ̂ ( f ) = LTσ̂ (hℓ πL (gℓ )). On the other hand
we have LTσ̂ (hℓ πL (gℓ )) = LTσ (hℓ gℓ ), hence LTσ (F) = LTσ (hℓ gℓ ), so that LTσ (gℓ ) | LTσ (F), a
contradiction.
Case 2: H , 0. Since πL can only lower the leading term of a polynomial, we have the
equality LTσ (F) = LTσ (U), hence LTσ (F) = LTσ (HL). But then LTσ (H) | LTσ (F), and H ∈ I, a
contradiction.
Claim (b) follows from (a) and the fact that the leading terms of the elements of both bases
are the same.
To prove (c) we let t be a power product in the support of g j − LTσ (g j ). We have t = xai t′ with
xi ∤ t′ . Then πL (t) = cao t′ . We know that t′ is not divided by any leading term of the πL (g j ), hence
also t is not divided by any leading term of the g j .
The following examples show the tightness of the assumptions in the above theorem.
Example 1.11. Let P = K[x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ] and L = x2 − x4 . Then let σ be any degree-compatible
term ordering, let G = {x21 , x1 x3 − x2 , x1 x4 , x24 }, let I be the ideal generated by G, and let
πL (G) = {x21 , x1 x3 − x4 , x1 x4 , x24 }. We have
x21 x3 − x1 (x1 x3 − x2 ) − x1 x4 = x1 (x2 − x4 ) = x1 L ∈ I
which implies that L divides zero modulo I, so that all the hypotheses are satisfied except one.
And we see that πL (G) is the reduced σ̂-Gröbner basis of IL , while G is not a σ-Gröbner basis of
I, since the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of I is {x21 , x1 x3 − x2 , x1 x4 , x24 , x1 x2 , x22 }.
Example 1.12. Let P = K[x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ] and L = x2 − x4 , let σ be any degree-compatible
term ordering on Tn , let G = {x22 − x23 , x1 x2 }, let I be the ideal generated by G, and finally
let πL (G) = {−x23 + x24 , x1 x4 }. We observe that all the hypotheses are satisfied, except the fact
that LTσ (gi ) = LTσ̂ (ĝi ) for i = 1, . . . , s. And we see that πL (G) is the reduced σ̂-Gröbner
basis of IL , while G is not a σ-Gröbner basis of I, since the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of I is
{x22 − x23 , x1 x2 , x2 x23 , x43 }.
Example 1.13. Let P = K[x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ] and let ℓ = x2 , L = x1 − ℓ = x1 − x2 . Let σ be any
degree-compatible term ordering, and let G = {x32 + x1 x3 − x2 x3 , x3 }. Then πL (G) = {x32 , x3 } is
the reduced σ̂-Gröbner basis, while G is not reduced.
1.4. Common Lifting
In the following we consider the lifting of Gröbner bases as described in Theorem 1.10 and
start investigating how to make it explicit.
Assumptions 1.14. Let P = K[x1 , . . . , xn ], i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, ci+1 , . . . , cn ∈ K, N ∈ N. Moreover let
γ1 , . . . , γN be distinct elements of K, and for k = 1, . . . , N let Lk = xi − ℓk be linear polynomials
P
with ℓk = j>i c j x j + γk if i < n , and ℓ = γk if i = n. We identify P/(Lk ) with the polynomial ring
P̂ = K[x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , n] via the isomorphism induced by πLk (xi ) = ℓk and πLk (x j ) = x j
for j , i.
Definition 1.15. Under Assumptions 1.14, let ĝ1 , . . . , ĝN ∈ P̂ and let g ∈ P be a polynomial such
that πLk (g) = ĝk for k = 1, . . . , N. Then g is called a common lifting of ĝ1 , . . . , ĝN .
6
Remark 1.16. The linear polynomials are pairwise coprime. Therefore the Chinese Remainder
Theorem (see [5, Lemma 3.7.4]) implies that all the common liftings of the gk differ by a mulQN
tiple of k=1
Lk . Consequently there exists at most one common lifting of degree less than N.
However, even if the degrees of the ĝi are less than N, a common lifting of degree less than N
may not exist, as the following example shows.
Example 1.17. Let P = K[x, y], L0 = y, L1 = y − 1, L2 = y − 2. Then let ĝ1 = x, ĝ2 = x + 1,
ĝ3 = x + 4, and observe that their degree is less than N = 2. We compute a common lifting and
get g = y2 + x, as the only one of degree less than 3. Therefore there is no common lifting of
degree less than 2.
Theorem 1.18. (Common Lifting of Gröbner Bases)
Under Assumptions 1.14, let σ be a term ordering on Tn and let I be an ideal in P.
(a) If γ1 , . . . , γN are sufficiently generic, all the minimal σ̂-Gröbner bases of the ideals πLk (I)
share the same number of elements and the same leading terms, say t1 , . . . , t s .
(b) If N ≫ 0, at least one of the Lk does not divide zero modulo I.
(c) Let g1 , . . . , g s be common liftings of the corresponding elements in minimal σ̂-Gröbner
bases of the ideals πLk (I). If gi ∈ I and LTσ (gi ) = ti for i = 1, . . . , s then {g1 , . . . , g s } is a
minimal σ-Gröbner basis of I.
(d) Let L = xi − γ and let g1 , . . . , g s be common liftings of the corresponding elements in the
reduced σ̂-Gröbner bases of the ideals πLk (I). If gi ∈ I and LTσ (gi ) = ti for i = 1, . . . , s
then {g1 , . . . , g s } is the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of I.
P
Proof. To prove claim (a), we let a be a free parameter, let La = xi − ( j>i c j x j + a), and
let Ia be the ideal I + (La ) in the polynomial ring K(a)[x1 , . . . , xn ]. The σ-reduced Gröbner
basis of Ia consists of La and polynomials in K(a)[x1, . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xn ]. It evaluates to the
reduced Gröbner basis of the corresponding ideal for almost all values of a which implies that
the ideals πLk (I) share the same leading term ideals (see [6, Proposition 2.3] for a more general
argument).
Claim (b) follows from the fact that each primary component of I can contain at most one of
the linear polynomials Lk , since any pair of them generate the unit ideal.
Claim (c) follows from (b) and Theorem 1.10.b.
Claim (d) follows from (b) and Theorem 1.10.c.
Here we show an interesting example.
Example 1.19. (Zitrus)
There is a well-known example of a surface which represents a lemon (see for instance the
web page http://imaginary.org/gallery/herwig-hauser-classic). Its equation is the
following F := x2 + z2 − y3 (1 − y)3 = 0. We cut it with a sufficiently high number of parallel
hyperplanes. In our case we choose z − γ = 0 for γ ∈ {−5, −4, −3, −2, 2, 3, 4, 5} and get the
hyperplane sections defined by the following eight ideals: (y + 5, x2 + z2 + 27000), (y + 4, x2 +
z2 + 8000), (y + 3, x2 + z2 + 1728), (y + 2, x2 + z2 + 216), (y − 2, x2 + z2 + 8), (y − 3, x2 + z2 + 216),
(y − 4, x2 + z2 + 1728), (y − 5, x2 + z2 + 8000). We use a CoCoA (see [1]) script to compute the
reconstruction according to Theorem 1.18, and indeed we get F back. As a matter of curiosity,
we observe that the real lemon is reconstructed using eight slices with no real points.
7
Remark 1.20. In general, if we want to use Theorem 1.18 to compute a Gröbner basis of I, we
need to verify that the polynomials gk have the correct leading term, and this is easy to do. We
also need to verify that they are in I, and in general this is a limit to the usefulness of the theorem.
Nevertheless there are nice situations where this verification can be done easily. For instance, if
we have a Gröbner basis G of I and want to compute the reduced Gröbner basis of I with respect
to another term ordering, then checking that the gk belong to I entails the simple verification
that their normal forms with respect to G are zero. A favourable situation is the following. If
the ideal I is known via a parametrization, then checking that the gk belong to I requires only
evaluating them at the parametric expressions of the coordinates. Let us show an example where
the expected output is a single polynomial.
Example 1.21. (Rational Surface)
Let S be the affine surface in A3Q given parametrically by
x =
y =
z =
s5 − st3 − t
st2 − s
s4 − t2
The implicit equation of S can be computed using a standard elimination procedure. We do it
in CoCoA and get the implicit equation F = 0 where F is the polynomial displayed below. It
has degree 14 and its support contains 319 power products. Using a procedure suggested by the
theorem and the remark, we can slice the surface with several hyperplanes parallel to z = 0, compute the cartesian equation of the corresponding curve viewed as a curve in the affine plane, and
then reconstruct the equation of the surface. This procedure computes the polynomial F using
1
of the time used by the standard procedure, and deserves further investigation.
approximately 120
1
F = y14 +10y13 −12x2 y8 z3 +34xy9 z3 −10y10 z3 +8xy5 z7 −11y6 z7 −y2 z11 +45y12 +8x5 y5 z2 −65x4 y6 z2 +132x3 y7 z2 −32x2 y8 z2 −34xy9 z2 −
3y 0z2 − 72x2 y7 z3 + 204xy8 z3 − 44y9 z3 + 2x4 y2 z6 − 2x3 y3 z6 + 45x2 y4 z6 − 78xy5 z6 + 57y6 z6 + 32xy4 z7 − 44y5 z7 − x2 z1 0 − 8y2 z1 0 − 2yz1 1 +
120y1 1 − x8 y2 z + 18x7 y3 z − 86x6 y4 z + 120x5 y5 z + 38x4 y6 z − 92x3 y7 z − 28x2 y8 z + 4xy9 z + 32x5 y4 z2 − 260x4 y5 z2 + 464x3 y6 z2 + 112x2 y7 z2 −
236xy8 z2 −48y9 z2 −180x2 y6 z3 +510xy7 z3 −50y8 z3 +2x6 z5 −10x5 yz5 +62x4 y2 z5 −44x3 y3 z5 +31x2 y4 z5 +54xy5 z5 +4y6 z5 +4x4 yz6 −4x3 y2 z6 +
138x2 y3 z6 − 196xy4 z6 + 164y5 z6 + 48xy3 z7 − 66y4 z7 − 10x2 z9 − 24y2 z9 − 18yz1 0 − z1 1 − x1 0 + 10x9 y − 31x8 y2 + 18x7 y3 + 49x6 y4 − 26x5 y5 −
42x4 y6 −4x3 y7 +7x2 y8 +2xy9 +210y1 0−2x8 yz+36x7 y2 z−156x6 y3 z+56x5 y4 z+544x4 y5 z−296x3 y6 z−312x2 y7 z−24xy8 z−4y9 z+48x5 y3 z2 −
390x4 y4 z2 + 520x3 y5 z2 + 810x2 y6 z2 − 490xy7 z2 − 233y8 z2 − 240x2 y5 z3 + 680xy6 z3 + 64y7 z3 + 10x6 z4 − 2x5 yz4 + 127x4 y2 z4 − 78x3 y3 z4 +
163x2 y4 z4 − 12xy5 z4 + 5y6 z4 + 64x4 yz5 + 24x3 y2 z5 + 164x2 y3 z5 + 88xy4 z5 + 116y5 z5 + 2x4 z6 − 2x3 yz6 + 153x2 y2 z6 − 140xy3 z6 + 183y4 z6 +
32xy2 z7 − 44y3 z7 − 41x2 z8 − 32y2 z8 − 64yz9 − 10z1 0 + 18x8 y − 124x7 y2 + 204x6 y3 + 104x5 y4 − 236x4 y5 − 120x3 y6 + 24x2 y7 + 16xy8 + 252y9 −
x8 z + 18x7 yz − 50x6 y2 z − 286x5 y3 z + 950x4 y4 z + 216x3 y5 z − 908x2 y6 z − 280xy7 z − 44y8 z + 32x5 y2 z2 − 260x4 y3 z2 + 80x3 y4 z2 + 1480x2 y5 z2 −
232xy6 z2 − 518y7 z2 + 32x6 z3 + 40x5 yz3 + 128x4 y2 z3 + 66x3 y3 z3 − 134x2 y4 z3 + 518xy5 z3 + 231y6 z3 + 32x5 z4 + 174x4 yz4 + 164x3 y2 z4 +
364x2 y3 z4 + 164xy4 z4 + 46y5 z4 + 22x4 z5 + 80x3 yz5 + 327x2 y2 z5 + 178xy3 z5 + 267y4 z5 + 72x2 yz6 − 4xy2 z6 + 126y3 z6 − 88x2 z7 + 8xyz7 −
27y2 z7 − 112yz8 − 41z9 + 4x8 − 22x7 y − 95x6 y2 + 496x5 y3 − 185x4 y4 − 484x3 y5 − 58x2 y6 + 40xy7 + 209y8 + 24x6 yz − 260x5 y2 z + 380x4 y3 z +
1120x3 y4 z − 816x2 y5 z − 776xy6 z − 180y7 z + 56x6 z2 + 88x5 yz2 + 59x4 y2 z2 − 150x3 y3 z2 + 1195x2 y4 z2 + 450xy5 z2 − 598y6 z2 + 128x5 z3 +
296x4 yz3 + 424x3 y2 z3 + 208x2 y3 z3 + 308xy4 z3 + 280y5 z3 + 92x4 z4 + 362x3 yz4 + 641x2 y2 z4 + 514xy3 z4 + 202y4 z4 + 32x3 z5 + 246x2 yz5 +
308xy2 z5 + 300y3 z5 − 92x2 z6 + 18xyz6 + 76y2 z6 − 96yz7 − 88z8 − 46x6 y + 128x5 y2 + 340x4 y3 − 560x3 y4 − 316x2 y5 + 16xy6 + 112y7 + 52x6 z +
42x5 yz − 38x4 y2 z + 926x3 y3 z + 97x2 y4 z − 884xy5 z − 362y6 z + 224x5 z2 + 368x4 yz2 + 248x3 y2 z2 + 546x2 y3 z2 + 692xy4 z2 − 358y5 z2 + 248x4 z3 +
680x3 yz3 + 736x2 y2 z3 + 456xy3 z3 + 257y4 z3 + 160x3 z4 + 602x2 yz4 + 776xy2 z4 + 368y3 z4 − 2x2 z5 + 194xyz5 + 233y2 z5 − 4yz6 − 104z7 + 10x6 +
46x5 y + 179x4 y2 − 82x3 y3 − 369x2 y4 − 64xy5 + 21y6 + 192x5 z + 220x4 yz + 388x3 y2 z + 464x2 y3 z − 432xy4 z − 396y5 z + 384x4 z2 + 624x3 yz2 +
502x2 y2 z2 + 486xy3 z2 − 78y4 z2 + 352x3 z3 + 872x2 yz3 + 792xy2 z3 + 322y3 z3 + 186x2 z4 + 536xyz4 + 384y2 z4 + 32xz5 + 98yz5 − 62z6 + 64x5 +
134x4 y + 28x3 y2 − 112x2 y3 − 64xy4 − 22y5 + 298x4 z + 358x3 yz + 302x2 y2 z − 82xy3 z − 257y4 z + 416x3 z2 + 640x2 yz2 + 448xy2 z2 + 82y3 z2 +
368x2 z3 + 688xyz3 + 376y2 z3 + 128xz4 + 200yz4 − 6z5 + 100x4 + 94x3 y − 21x2 y2 − 15y4 + 256x3 z + 248x2 yz + 28xy2 z − 112y3 z + 344x2 z2 +
440xyz2 +167y2 z2 +224xz3 +240yz3 +32z4 +64x3 +22x2 y+148x2 z+94xyz−21y2 z+192xz2 +144yz2 +56z3 +15x2 +64xz+22yz+48z2 +15z
8
2. Families of Schemes and the Hough Transform
In this section we consider families of algebraic schemes and recall the necessary tools to
introduce the notion of Hough transform.
2.1. Families of Schemes
As said in the introduction, the notation is borrowed from [4] and [5]. We start the section by
recalling some definitions taken from [6]. We let x1 , . . . , xn be indeterminates, and most of the
time in the following we use the notation x = (x1 , . . . , xn ). If K is a field, the multivariate polynomial ring P = K[x1 , . . . , xn ] is denoted by K[x]. If f1 (x), . . . , fk (x) are polynomials in P, the
set { f1 (x), . . . , fk (x)} is denoted by f(x), and f(x) = 0 is called a system of polynomial equations.
Moreover, we let a = (a1 , . . . , am ) be an m-tuple of indeterminates which will play the role
of parameters. If we are given polynomials F1 (a, x), . . . , Fk (a, x) in K[a, x], we let F(a, x) = 0
be the corresponding set of systems of polynomial equations parametrized by a, and the ideal
generated by F(a, x) in K[a, x] is denoted by I(a, x).
Let S be the affine scheme of the a-parameters, R its coordinate ring, and F the affine scheme
Spec(K[a, x]/I(a, x)). Then there exists a morphism of schemes Φ : F −→ S, or equivalently a
K-algebra homomorphism ϕ : R −→ K[a, x]/I(a, x). The morphism Φ, and F itself if the context
is clear, is called a family of sub-schemes of Am .
Definition 2.1. If S = Am and I(a, x) ∩ K[a] = (0) the parameters a are said to be independent
with respect to F , or simply independent.
Remark 2.2. According to the above definition, the parameters a are independent if and only if
the K-algebra homomorphism ϕ : K[a] −→ K[a, x]/I(a, x) is injective. Therefore the parameters a are independent if and only if the morphism Φ : F −→ Am is dominant.
Definition 2.3. Let f(x) be a set of polynomials in P, and let F(a, x) define a family which specializes to f(x) for a suitable choice of the parameters. Then let I = (f(x)), let I(a, x) = (F(a, x)),
let F = Spec(K[a, x]/I(a, x)), let S = Am , assume that the a-parameters are independent, and
let Φ : F −→ Am be the associated morphism of schemes. A dense Zariski-open subscheme U
of Am with the property that Φ−1 (U) −→ U is free is said to be an F -free subscheme of Am or
simply an F -free scheme.
Assumptions 2.4. Let Φ : F −→ Am be a family of sub-schemes of An parametrized by Am .
Then let σ be a term ordering on Tn , let Gσ (a, x) be the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of the extended
ideal I(a, x)K(a)[x], and let dσ (a) be the least common multiple of all the denominators of the
coefficients of the polynomials in G(a, x).
Proposition 2.5. Under Assumptions 2.4 the open subscheme Uσ = Am \ {dσ (a) = 0} of Am
is F -free.
Proof. See [6, Proposition 2.3].
Definition 2.6. The set Gσ (a, x) is called the universal reduced σ-Gröbner basis of F . We say
that dσ (a) is the σ-denominator of Φ, that Φ|dσ (a) is the σ-free restriction of Φ, and that Uσ is
the σ-free set of the family F .
9
Proposition 2.7. Under Assumptions 2.4 the following conditions are equivalent.
(a) The a-parameters are dependent with respect to F .
(b) We have I(a, x)K(a)[x] = (1).
(c) We have Gσ (a, x) = {1}.
Proof. The equivalence between (b) and (c) is a standard (easy) fact in computer algebra, so let
us prove the equivalence between (a) and (b). If the a-parameters are dependent with respect
to F then I(a, x) ∩ K[a] contains a non-zero polynomial, say f (a). Then I(a, x)K(a)[x] contains
a non-zero constant, hence it is the unit ideal. Conversely, if I(a, x)K(a)[x] = (1) then we may
write 1 as a combinations of polynomials in I(a, x) with coefficients in K(a)[x]. Hence there
exists a common denominator, say f (a) such that f (a) = f (a) · 1 ∈ I(a, x), and the proof is
complete.
Let Φ : F −→ Am be a dominant family of sub-schemes of Am . It corresponds to a K-algebra
homomorphism ϕ : K[a] −→ K[a, x]/I(a, x). As observed in Remark 2.2, the dominance implies
that the a-parameters are independent, therefore ϕ is injective. If we fix α = (α1 , . . . , αm ), i.e.
a rational “parameter point” in Am , we get Spec(K[α, x]/I(α, x)), a special fiber of Φ, hence a
special member of the family. Clearly we have the equality K[α, x] = K[x] so that I(α, x) can be
seen as an ideal in K[x]. With this convention we denote the scheme Spec(K[x]/I(α, x)) by Xα,x .
On the other hand, there exists another morphism Ψ : F −→ An which corresponds to the
K-algebra homomorphism ψ : K[x] −→ K[a, x]/I(a, x). If we fix a rational point p = (ξ1 , . . . , ξn )
in An , we get a special fiber of the morphism Ψ, namely Spec(K[a, p]/I(a, p)). Clearly we have
K[a, p] = K[a] so that I(a, p) can be seen as an ideal in K[a]. With this convention we denote
the scheme Spec(K[a]/I(a, p)) by Γa,p .
Definition 2.8. Let G = Gσ (a, x) be the universal reduced σ-Gröbner basis of F , listed with
σ-increasing leading terms. The corresponding list of non-constant coefficients of G is denoted
by NCCG and called the non constant coefficient list of G. Moreover, if α ∈ Uσ then NCCG (α)
is the list obtained by α-evaluating the elements NCCG .
Example 2.9. Let F be the family of subschemes of A2 which is defined by the following ideal
I(a, x) = (x21 + a21 x2 − a2 , x32 + (a23 + 1)x21 + x1 + a1 a3 x2 − 1), and let σ be a degree-compatible
term ordering with x1 >σ x2 >σ x3 . Then NCCG = [a21 , −a2 , a23 + 1, a1 a3 ].
The main property of the non constant coefficient list of Gσ (a, x) is described as follows.
Proposition 2.10. Under Assumptions 2.4, the correspondence between {Xα,x | α ∈ Uσ }
and NCCG which is defined by sending Xα,x to NCCG (α) is bijective.
Proof. First we show that the universal reduced σ-Gröbner basis of F specializes to the reduced
σ-Gröbner basis of each fiber Xα,x . The reason is that when we specialize we do not affect
the leading terms and we do not add new elements to the support of the polynomials involved.
Then the conclusion follows from the fact that the reduced σ-Gröbner basis of an ideal is unique
(see [4, Theorem 2.4.13]).
Proposition 2.10 suggests the following definition.
10
Definition 2.11. Let Uσ be the σ-free set of F , let G = Gσ (a, x) be the universal reduced
σ-Gröbner of F , and let NCCG be the non constant coefficient list of G. Then the scheme
f s (a)
parametrized by NCCG is called the σ-scheme of F . If NCCG = ( df11(a)
(a) , . . . , d s (a) ), then the
σ-scheme of F is represented parametrically by
y1 =
f s (a)
f1 (a)
, . . . , ys =
d1 (a)
d s (a)
which is called the parametric representation of the σ-scheme of F .
Example 2.12. Let F = Spec(K[a, x]/I(a, x) where I(a, x) = (x2 + a21 x + a1 a2 y + a22 ), and let σ
be a degree-compatible term ordering. Then NCCG = (a21 , a1 a2 , a22 ) and the σ-scheme of F is
the affine cone Xσ represented by y1 = a21 , y2 = a1 a2 , y3 = a22 . Its defining ideal in K[y1 , y2 , y3 ]
is generated by y22 − y1 y3 , and we have dim(Xσ ) = 2.
Using Proposition 2.10 and the theory of Gröbner fans (see [9]), we get the following result.
Corollary 2.13. Let Φ : F −→ Am be a dominant family of sub-schemes of An .
(a) For every term ordering σ, the σ-scheme of F represents the generic fibers of F .
(b) The set of σ-schemes of F is finite.
Proof. Claim (a) is a restatement of the proposition. Claim (b) follows from the theory of Gröbner fans which entails there is only a finite number of reduced Gröbner bases of the ideal I(a, x).
Remark 2.14. The statement of the proposition does not imply that there is a bijection between
Uσ and NCCG , as Example 2.9 shows . For instance in that example, for (a1 , a2 , a3 ) = (1, 1, 1)
and (a1 , a2 , a3 ) = (−1, 1, −1) we get the same fiber. The reason is that the proposition treats
{Xα,x | α ∈ Uσ } as a set. It means that if we have Xα,x = Xα′,x we view the two fibers as a single
element of the set.
2.2. Hyperplane Sections and Families
The setting of this subsection is the following.
Assumptions 2.15. Let F be a family of sub-schemes of An parametrized by the affine space Am
and let Φ : F −→ Am be a dominant morphism which corresponds to an injective K-algebra
homomorphism ϕ : K[a] −→ K[a, x]/I(a, x).
Assumptions 2.16. Let P = K[x], let i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, let ci+1 , . . . , cn , γ ∈ K, and let L = xi − ℓ
P
be the linear polynomial with ℓ = j>i c j x j + γ if i < n , and ℓ = γ if i = n. Moreover,
we let xı̂ = (x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xn ) and identify K[a, x]/(L) with K[a, xı̂ ] via the isomorphism
induced by πL (xi ) = ℓ, πL (x j ) = x j for j , i.
Notation 2.17. The scheme Spec(K[a, xı̂]/πL (I(a, x)) is called the L-hyperplane section of F
and denoted by FL . The morphism FL −→ Am which corresponds to the K-algebra homomorphism ϕL : K[a] −→ K[a, xı̂ ]/πL (I(a, x)) canonically induced by ϕ, is called ΦL . Then
let σ be a term ordering such that x1 >σ x2 >σ · · · >σ xn , let Gσ (a, x) = (g1 (a, x), . . . , g s (a, x))
be the universal reduced σ-Gröbner of F , and let σ̂ be the term ordering induced by σ on
T(x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xn ).
11
Proposition 2.18. Under Assumptions 2.15 and 2.16, let Gσ (a, x) = {g1 (a, x), . . . , g s (a, x))} be a
monic σ-Gröbner of I(a, x), and let LTσ (g j (a, x)) = LTσ̂ (πL (g j (a, x))) for every j = 1, . . . , s.
(a) The linear polynomial L does not divide zero modulo I(a, x).
(b) The set {πL (g1 (a, x)), . . . , πL (g s (a, x))} is a minimal σ̂-Gröbner basis of πL (I(a, x)).
(c) If L = xi − γ, then {πL (g1 (a, x)), . . . , πL (g s (a, x))} is the reduced σ̂-Gröbner basis of
πL (I(a, x)).
(d) The a-parameters are independent with respect to FL .
Proof. Claims (a), (b), (c) follow immediately from Theorem 1.7. To prove claim (d) we observe
that the a-parameters are independent with respect to F by assumption. Therefore Gσ (a, x) , {1}
by Proposition 2.7 and so LTσ (I(a, x)) , (1). Our assumptions imply that also LTσ̂ (I(a, x)L ) , (1)
and hence the conclusion follows from Proposition 2.7.
The following example shows that without the assumption of the proposition, even if Φ is
dominant, ΦL needs not be such.
Example 2.19. Let F be the family of sub-schemes of A4 defined by I(a, x) = (x2 −a1 y, y2 −a2 ).
We check that I(a, x) ∩ K[a] = (0), so we conclude that the parameters are independent. However
if L = x − y, then FL is defined by I(a, x)L = (y2 − a1 y, y2 − a2 ) and we have the following
equality I(a, x)L ∩ K[a] = (a21 a2 − a22 ) which means that the parameters with respect to FL are not
independent anymore.
An easy consequence of the proposition is that the non-constant coefficient list of Gσ̂ (a, x)L
is easily deduced from the non-constant coefficient list of Gσ (a, x). Let us have a look at an
example which illustrates the proposition.
Example 2.20. Let F be the sub-scheme of A7 defined by the ideal I(a, x) generated by the two
polynomials
F1 = a1 xy − a2 y2 − w, F2 = a2 x2 + a3 y2 + z2
We pick a degree-compatible term ordering σ with the property that x >σ y >σ z >σ w, and let
a22
a2
1 a2
xw
+
yw. Then Gσ (a, x) = { a11 F1 , a12 F2 , F3 } is the universal
F3 = y3 + a3 +a12 a yz2 + a3a+a
2
3
a2 +a21 a3
2
1 3
2
1 a3
reduced σ-Gröbner basis of F . Therefore
a2
a21
a2
a1 a2
1 a3 1
,
, , 3 12 , 3
NCCGσ (a,x) = − , − ,
a1
a1 a2 a2 a2 + a1 a3 a2 + a21 a3 a32 + a21 a3
The set of the leading terms of Gσ (a, x) is {xy, x2 , y3 } and if we let ℓ = c1 w + c2 with c1 , c2 ∈ K,
L = z − ℓ, then claim (b) of the proposition implies that the substitution of z with ℓ in Gσ (a, x)
produces a minimal σ̂-Gröbner basis of FL . For instance if ℓ = w − 1 we get the equality
πL (Gσ̂ (a, x)) = { a11 F1 , a12 (a2 x2 + a3 y2 + (w − 1)2 , F 3 } where
F 3 = y3 +
= y3 +
a32
a21
a2
a1 a2
y(w − 1)2 + 3
xw + 3 2 2 yw
2
2
+ a1 a3
a2 + a1 a3
a2 + a1 a3
a21
a32
+
a21 a3
yw2 +
a32
a2 − 2a2
a2
a1 a2
xw + 32 2 1 yw + 3 1 2 y
2
+ a1 a3
a2 + a1 a3
a2 + a1 a3
It turns out that this is the reduced Gröbner basis, consequently we get the equality
a2
a2
a2 − 2a2
a2
1 a3 1
a1 a2
, 32 2 1 , 3 1 2
,
, 3 12 , 3
NCCG = − , − ,
2
a1
a1 a2 a2 a2 + a1 a3 a2 + a1 a3 a2 + a1 a3 a2 + a1 a3
12
If we compute the elimination of [x, y, z, w] from the ideal (F1 , F2 ) we get (0), hence the parameters are independent. And if we compute the σ-scheme of F we get a scheme isomorphic
to A3 .
Remark 2.21. As we have seen, Proposition 2.18 is almost entirely based on Theorem 1.7.
Analogously, one can use Theorem 1.10 and Theorem 1.18 to deduce similar theorems in the
case of families. This easy task is left to the reader.
2.3. The Hough Transform and its Dimension
We recall the definition of Hough transform (see [6, Definition 3.11]).
Definition 2.22. (The Hough Transform)
With the above notation and definitions, let p = (ξ1 , . . . , ξn ) ∈ An . Then the scheme Γa,p is said
to be the Hough transform of the point p with respect to the family Φ. If it is clear from the
context, we simply say that the scheme Γa,p is the Hough transform of the point p and we denote
it by H p . We observe that if p < Im(Ψ), then H p = ∅.
Hough transforms were invented by P.V.C. Hough (see [2]). Here we show an example which
illustrates the original idea.
Example 2.23. Let F be the hypersurface of A4 defined by the equation x2 + a1 x1 + a2 = 0. It
correspond to the K-algebra homomorphism K[a1 , a2 ] −→ K[a1 , a2 , x1 , x2 ]/(x2 + a1 x1 + a2 ). We
have the following diagram
Φ
F
Ψ
A2(x1 ,x2 )
A2(a1 ,a2 )
It is easy to check that dim(F ) = 3 and that Φ and Ψ are dominant. It is clear that the Hough
transform of the point (ξ1 , ξ2 ) is the straight line in the parameter space defined by the equation
ξ2 + ξ1 a1 + a2 = 0. If some points, say p1 , p2 , . . . , p s , have Hough transforms which intersect in
a point, say (α1 , α2 ), it means that the line x2 + α1 x1 + α2 = 0 contains p1 , p2 , . . . , p s . Using this
idea, Hough was able to detect line segments, and similarly arcs, inside images.
Next, we show an example where Φ is dominant but Ψ is not.
Example 2.24. Let F be the sub-scheme of A4 defined by the ideal
I = (x21 − x1 , x1 x2 − x2 , x22 + a1 a2 x1 − (a1 + a2 )x2 )
If we draw the diagram, it looks exactly the same as the diagram of Example 2.23, but there
are several differences. It is easy to check that dim(F ) = 2 and that Φ is dominant. However,
if we perform the elimination of [a1 , a2 ] we get the ideal (x21 − x1 , x1 x2 − x2 ), which means
that Ψ is not dominant. In particular, the closure of the image of Ψ is the union of the point
(0, 0) and the line x1 − 1 = 0 . We observe that the fiber of Ψ over the point (0, 0) is the plane
defined by x1 = x2 = 0 while the fibers over the points on x = 1 are pairs of lines defined by
x1 = 1, x2 = c, (c − a1 )(c − a2 ) = 0.
The above example justifies the reason why in the next proposition we need to consider the
image of Ψ.
13
Proposition 2.25. (Dimension of Hough Transforms)
Let Y ⊆ X be an irreducible component of the closure of the image of Ψ, let p be the generic
point of Y, and let Xα,x be the generic fiber of Φ.
(a) dim (H p ) = dim (F ) − dim (Y) = m + dim(Xα,x ) − dim (Y).
(b) If Ψ is dominant and dim(F ) = m, then dim(H p ) = 0.
(c) If dim(H p ) = 0 and the generators of I are linear polynomials in the parameters a, then H p
is a single rational point.
Proof. In the proof we use the notation Kdim to indicate the Krull dimension. To prove (a)
we observe that we have the equality dim (F ) = Kdim K[a, x]/I(a, x) . Then we let p be the
prime ideal which defines Y so that dim (Y) = Kdim (K[a]/p). Since dim (H p ) and dim (Xα,x ) are
the Krull dimensions of the fibers of Ψ and Φ respectively, the claim follows from [7, Corollary
14.5]. To prove claim (b) we observe that if Ψ is dominant then Y = X = Am , hence dim(Y) = m,
so we have dim(H p ) = m − m = 0. Claim (c) follows from (b) and the fact that the coordinates
of the points in H p are the solutions of a linear system.
Let us have a look at some examples.
Example 2.26. Let F be the sub-scheme of A5 defined by the ideal I generated by the two
polynomials
F1 = (x2 + y2 )3 − (a1 (x2 + y2 ) − a2 (x3 − 3xy2 ))2 ;
F2 = a1 z − a2 x.
If we pick a degree-compatible term ordering σ such that z >σ y >σ x, then LTσ (F1 ) = y6 ,
LTσ (F2 ) = z if a1 , 0, and {F1 , a11 F2 } is the reduced Gröbner basis of I. Using Proposition 2.5,
we get Uσ = A2 \ {a1 = 0} and we see that Φ−1 (Uσ ) −→ Uσ is free. If we perform the elimination of [a1 , a2 ] we get the zero ideal, hence also Ψ is dominant, actually surjective. Counting
dimensions as suggested by the proposition, we see that dim (Γa,p ) = 0 for the generic fiber. Since
a1 , a2 are quadratic and related by a linear equation, the Hough transforms of the points in A3 are
pairs of points. For instance, if we pick the point p = (1, 1, 1), its Hough transform is the pair of
points ( √12 , 1), (− √12 , − √12 ).
Example 2.27. We modify the above example in the following way. Let F be the sub-scheme
of A5 defined by the ideal I generated by the two polynomials
F1 = (x2 + y2 )3 − a1 ((x2 + y2 ) − (x3 − 3xy2 ))2 ;
F2 = z − a2 x.
If we pick a degree-compatible term ordering σ such that z >σ y >σ x, then LTσ (F1 ) = y6 ,
LTσ (F2 ) = z, and {F1 , F2 } is the reduced Gröbner basis of I. Using Proposition 2.5 we see
that Φ is free. If we perform the elimination of [a1 , a2 ] we get the zero ideal, hence also Ψ is
dominant, actually surjective. Counting dimensions as suggested by the proposition, we see that
dim (Γa,p ) = 0 for the generic fiber. Up to here the situation is similar to the above example. But
now the two parameters a1 , a2 are linear in the polynomials F1 , F2 , hence the Hough transforms
of the generic point in A3 is a single point as described in the proposition. It has coordinates
α1 , α2 where
(x2 + y2 )3
z
α1 =
α2 =
2
2
3
2
2
x
((x + y ) − (x − 3xy ))
14
2.4. Hyperplane Sections and Hough Transforms
As we have seen in Examples 1.19, 1.21, and Remark 2.21, there is a concrete possibility of
reconstructing ideals from this hyperplane sections. In particular, it is interesting to be able to
reconstruct a surface from a set of planar curves obtained by slicing it. Here we show an example
which suggests how to do it.
Example 2.28. Suppose we want to reconstruct a surface using five images obtained by slicing
it with the hyperplanes z = 0, z = 1, z = −1, z = 2. Suppose that a priori we know that the
images contain curves of the family x3 − a1 y2 + a2 x + a3 y + a4 = 0. Using the Hough transforms
of the points of the image, we discover these curves. They are described by the ideals (z, x3 −y2 ),
(z − 1, x3 − y2 − x − y − 1), (z + 1, x3 − y2 + x + y + 1), (z − 2, x3 − y2 − 2x − 2y − 2). We proceed as we
suggested in Example 1.19 and reconstruct the surface. Its equation is x3 − xz − y2 − yz − z = 0.
Why could this reconstruction be important? Suppose we have the images of several parallel
sections of a human organ, which is exactly what happens with various types of tomography.
Then we try to identify the cross-sectional curves using Hough transforms. Once we have the
equations of these curves, even for a small portion of the organ, we can try to reconstruct the
equation of the whole surface using ideas outlined in the above example. This hot topic is under
investigation.
References
References
[1] CoCoATeam, CoCoA: a system for doing Computations in Commutative Algebra.
Available at http://cocoa.dima.unige.it.
[2] P.V.C. Hough, Method and means for recognizing complex patterns, US Patent 3069654, December 18, (1962).
[3] O. Duda, P.E. Hart, Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures, Comm. ACM, 15,
11–15, (1972).
[4] M. Kreuzer, L. Robbiano, Computational Commutative Algebra 1, Springer, Heidelberg, (2000).
[5] M. Kreuzer, L. Robbiano, Computational Commutative Algebra 2, Springer, Heidelberg, (2005).
[6] M.C. Beltrametti and L. Robbiano, An algebraic approach to Hough transforms J. Algebra 371, 669–681 (2012)
[7] D. Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics,
Springer, (1995).
[8] L. Robbiano, Parametrizations, hyperplane sections, Hough transforms, arXiv:1305.0478
[9] T. Mora, L. Robbiano, The Gröbner fan of an ideal, J. Symbolic Comput. 6, 183–208 (1988).
15
| 0math.AC
|
GreMuTRRR: A Novel Genetic Algorithm to Solve Distance
Geometry Problem for Protein Structures
Md. Lisul Islam1,2 , Swakkhar Shatabda1 and M Sohel Rahman2
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, United International University
House 80, Road 8A, Dhanmondi, Dhaka-1209, Bangladesh
2
Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Palashi, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
Email: {lisul,swakkhar}@cse.uiu.ac.bd, [email protected]
arXiv:1411.4246v1 [cs.NE] 16 Nov 2014
1
Abstract
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy is a widely used technique to predict the native structure of proteins. However, NMR machines are only able to report approximate and partial distances between
pair of atoms. To build the protein structure one has to solve the Euclidean distance geometry problem given
the incomplete interval distance data produced by NMR machines. In this paper, we propose a new genetic
algorithm for solving the Euclidean distance geometry problem for protein structure prediction given sparse
NMR data. Our genetic algorithm uses a greedy mutation operator to intensify the search, a twin removal
technique for diversification in the population and a random restart method to recover stagnation. On a
standard set of benchmark dataset, our algorithm significantly outperforms standard genetic algorithms.
keywords- Genetic Algorithms, Protein Structures, NMR, Euclidean Distance Geometry, Greedy Mutation
1
Introduction
The function of a protein depends on its native conformation or the stable three dimensional structure with
minimum free energy in a particular environment. Knowledge about this native structure is of paramount
importance and can have an enormous impact on the field of rational drug discovery. Nuclear magnetic resonance
(NMR) spectroscopy is one of the most widely used techniques to predict native structure of proteins. NMR
machines provide inter-atomic distance data for a given protein. Thus, the molecular distance geometry problem
(MDGP) arises in this context: given the set of Euclidean distances between the atoms in a protein, MDGP asks
to find the Cartesian coordinates of the atoms.
However, in practice, NMR machines are able to produce the inter-atomic distances of only a subset of the
pairs of atoms that are spatially close and this data too lacks accuracy. As a result, we are given the upper
and lower bounds of only a subset of the Euclidean distances. Thus we are left to solve a variant of the MDGP
problem with incomplete and inaccurate data. Many computational approaches have been applied to solve
1
MDGP problem with sparse and inaccurate data on real instances [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. However, complete search
methods like spatial branch and bound (sBB) and stochastic methods like variable neighborhood search (VNS)
have been able to solve the problem for proteins with only upto 50 atoms [7] and fail to converge quickly for
larger number of atoms.
In this paper, we present GreMuTRRR (pronounced grey matter), which is a scalable genetic algorithm to
solve the MDGP problem for sparse and inaccurate NMR data. Much of the success of our approach comes from
a greedy mutation operator, sude to intensify the search, a twin removal technique to diversify the population
and a random restart method to recover from stagnation. Experimental results on proteins with number of
atoms ranging from 50–2147 shows that our algorithm outperforms standard genetic algorithms and thus obtains
state-of-the-art results.
2
Preliminaries
In this section, we provide a formal definition of the MDGP problem and a brief description of genetic algorithms.
2.1
Distance Geometry Problem
Molecular distance geometry problem can formally be defined as followed [8]: find a set of Cartesian coordinates
c1 , c2 , · · · , cn ∈ R3 of atoms of a molecule such that lij ≤ dij ≤ uij , ∀(i, j) ∈ E, where lij and uij are the lower
and upper bounds of the Euclidean distance dij ≡ ||ci − cj || between a pair of atoms (i, j) ∈ E. Notably, in the
context of NMR data, E is sparse. Here, Cartesian coordinate ci of an atom i corresponds to a three dimensional
point (xi , yi , zi ) in the Euclidean space.
2.2
Genetic Algorithm
Genetic Algorithms are population-based search methods that resemble the natural phenomena of biological
evolution. Genetic Algorithms are widely used for different search optimization problems in different fraternity.
It basically starts with a pool of initial random solutions which is called the initial population. Each individual
in the population are encoded by a set of properties which are called chromosome or genotype which can be
altered for attaining diversification in the population. It then follows an iterative process in which each of these
iteration is called a generation. In each generation, the population are then allowed to evolve using different
operators which also mimics the natural process of biological evolution like mutation, recombination or survival
of the fittest. In each generation, the fitness of each individual is evaluated. Generally the fitness is the value of
the optimization function being considered to be solved. The more fit individuals are usually selected to breed
and generate new fitter individuals in the population. Thus a new generation of population is ‘breeded’ and are
used in the next generation. This process of evolution are continues until a sufficient number of generations has
2
been produced or a satisfactory level of fitness value has been attained.
3
Related Works
Euclidean distance geometry problem and its variants are applied to many problems in various fields including
wireless sensor network localization [9], inverse kinematic problem [10], multi dimensional scaling [11], protein
structure determination [6] etc. The variant of the MDGP problem, when we know distances for all pairs
(i, j) ∈ E = {1, 2, · · · }2 and dij = lij = uij has a polynomial algorithm to produce exact solution [8]. Even when
some of the pairwise distances are unknown, the problem is solvable by a linear time algorithm [3]. However,
the variant of MDGP with sparse and inaccurate data is shown to be NP-hard by More and Wu [12]. A recent
survey of computational methods applied to solve this variant of MDGP can be found in [2].
Among the general purpose methods, spatial branch and bound [13] and variable neighborhood search (VNS)
[14] methods are not scalable [7]. Smoothing based methods like DGSOL [6, 12] also fail for large instances of the
problem. In [15], VNS was combined with DGSOL approaches which provided better results for larger instances
but resulted into a slow algorithm. A combinatorial build up algorithm was proposed in [16]. It is important to
note that all these methods were tested on dense instances only. Among other methods applied to this problem
graph decomposition methods [1] and NLP formulations [17] are notable.
4
Our Method
GreMuTRRR is formally presented in Algorithm 1. It starts with a population initialized randomly and terminates at convergence. Convergence is achieved if the search does not improve the quality of the global solutions for
a given period of time. In each generation, individuals are selected from the population for cross-over to produce
new individuals. Mutation operations are performed probabilistically on the newly found individuals. Global
best solutions are updated in each iteration and are kept in the new populations to maintain elitism. Periodical
twin removal and random restart operations are activated to ensure diversification and recover stagnation. Rest
of this section describes the various components of GreMuTRRR.
4.1
Search Space
A Protein structure is formed by the interaction among different amino acids tied with each other by chemical
bonds. A pair of these amino acid cannot reside closer than 3.8Å to each other to avoid steric clash. If all the
amino acids in a certain protein structure align in a straight line, we have a chain of amino acids of length 3.8 × V
in each directions, where V is the number of amino acids in the protein structure. Hence, we have taken the
upper bound of our 3-D search space to 3.8 × V .
3
Algorithm 1: GreMuTRRR()
nonDiverseSteps = 0
2 nonImprovingSteps = 0
3 GreedyM utationRate = 0.8
4 Intialize the population, P randomly
5 while Termination criterion are met do
6
Pnew = {globalBest}
7
for each Individual X ∈ P do
8
hX1 , X2 i = tournamentSelection(P )
9
Xnew = crossOver(X1 , X2 )
10
add Xnew to Pnew
11
end
12
for each Individual X in Pnew do
13
if rand(0, 1) ≤ GreedyM utationRate then
14
greedyMutate(X)
15
else
16
randomMutate(X)
17
end
18
end
19
find the individual Xbest ∈ Pnew with best fitness
20
if fitness(globalBest) < fitness(Xbest ) then
21
globalBest = Xbest
22
nonImprovingSteps = 0
23
else
24
nonImprovingSteps + +
25
end
26
if nonDiverseSteps ≥ twinRemovalInterval then
27
activate twinRemoval(Pnew ) procedure
28
nonDiverseSteps = 0
29
else
30
nonDiverseSteps + +
31
end
32
if nonImprovingSteps ≥ randomRestartInterval then
33
activate randomRestart(Pnew ) procedure
34
nonImprovingSteps = 0
35
end
36
P = Pnew
37 end
38 return globalBest
1
4
4.2
Encoding
In our method, we have encoded every individual in a population by 3 × V number of genes. Here, V is the
number of atoms in a protein structure. Each of these genes in an individual is initialized randomly from an
uniform distribution of the range [0, 3.8 × V ]. So, an individual X can be represented as the ordered list of 3V
number of genes:
X=
x1 , y1 , z1 , x2 , y2 , z2 , . . . , xi , yi , zi , . . . , xV , yV , zV
| {z }
|
{z
}
| {z } | {z }
1st Atom
4.3
2nd Atom
ith Atom
V th Atom
Fitness Evaluation
We have calculated the euclidean distance between each pair of points present in the individual’s chromosome
where each non-overlapping consecutive subsequence of length three in the chromosome represents the position
of an atom in the protein structure in a 3-D space. We have assumed an upper bound, uij and lower bound, lij
of the distances between pair of amino acids. The fitness of an individual X is defined by as Equation 1 below:
1/2
F itness(X) =
1
|E|
X
e2ij
(1)
(i,j)∈E
where, eij = max{lij − kci − cj k, kci − cj k − uij , 0} is the error associated to the constraints lij ≤ kci − cj k ≤ uij
and |E| denotes the number of distance pairs given. This is known as the Largest Distance Error (LDE) in the
literature [2].
4.4
Genetic Operators
Genetic algorithms are guided by different genetic operators to help in keeping a balance of the exploitation
and exploration of the search process. We use three types of genetic operators in our search: random mutation,
greedy mutation and cross-over.
4.4.1
Random Mutation
Genetic diversity is a necessity for the process of evolution which is generally attained by mutation operator.
Mutation helps the evolutionary process to guide through and look for different avenues and solutions in the
search space. It also helps to avoid local optima by preventing the individuals from becoming too similar to one
another. We have used uniform mutation in our method. We have mutated the value of each gene into a new
value within the pre-specified bound of the search space([0, 3.8 × V ]). Whether an individual will be mutated
or not depends on a mutation rate which is kept to a lower value of 0.015 to avoid primitive random search. A
sketch of the pseudo-code is given in Algorithm 2.
5
Algorithm 2: Random Mutation (individual X)
1 mutationRate = 0.015
2 for each gene X(i) in the genotype of X do
3
if rand(0, 1) ≤ mutationRate then
4
X(i) = U (0, 1) ∗ (3 ∗ V );
5
end
6 end
7 return X
4.4.2
Greedy Mutation
In our proposed method, we have also used a greedy mutation where we greedily choose the new value of a
particular gene in an individual. We randomly alter a certain gene and try r different random values for the
gene temporarily. The value of gene that gives the best fitness of that individual is retained and used as the
final new value of the gene. As, greedy mutation is computationally expensive, we make selection between the
random mutation and greedy mutation with a probability, GreedyM utationRate(= 0.8). The algorithm for
greedy mutation is given in Algorithm 3.
Algorithm 3: Greedy Mutation (individual X)
1 set r = 20
2 for each gene X(i) in the genotype of X do
3
S = set of r random values for gene X(i) from the range [0, 3.8 ∗ V ]
4
find v ∈ S for which fitness(X) is minimum
5
set, X(i) = v
6 end
7 return X
4.4.3
Cross-over
Cross-over operators help genetic process to exploit the better solutions found thus far along the evolution process
and regenerate new individuals by combining the genetic information of the individuals with better fitness value.
It uses the better historical genetic information to guide the search into the search space regions with solutions
having better fitness. By recombining the fitter individuals to generate new offspring, this operator is likely to
produce more fitter individuals. We have used tournament selection with tournament size being equal to 5 to
select two individual parents to take part in the cross-over operation. We then have recombined genes of the two
parents and have generated a new set of genes for each of the offsprings with equal probability for each gene of
being selected from any of the parents. The algorithm is outlined in Algorithm 4.
6
Algorithm 4: Cross-Over (individual X1 , individual X2 )
1 Xnew be a new offspring
2 unif ormRate = 0.5
3 for each gene X(i) in the genotype of Xnew do
4
if rand(0, 1) ≥ unif ormRate then
5
Xnew (i) = X1 (i)
6
else
7
Xnew (i) = X2 (i)
8
end
9 end
10 return Xnew
4.5
Twin Removal
We have removed and reinitialized individuals with identical genetic information. We have defined the similarity
measure between two individuals as follows:
Similarity(X1 , X2 ) = e−
kX1 −X2 k2
2σ 2
(2)
Here, the value of σ has been chosen to be 75. The Similarity(X1 , X2 ) function will return a value in the
range [0,1]. The more the value of the similarity function is closer to 1, the more genetically similar are X1 and X2 .
We have chosen 0.8 as the threshold to define similarity between two individual. If Similarity(X1 , X2 ) >= 0.8,
we declare that X1 and X2 are twins and reinitialize randomly one of them. We have run the this Twin Removal
procedure after every 100 generations of evolution.
Algorithm 5: Twin Removal
1 similarityT hreshold = 0.8
2 for each pair of individuals (Xi , Xj ) in the population do
3
if Similarity(Xi , Xj ) ≥ similarityT hreshold then
4
declare Xi and Xj as Twins
5
reinitialize Xj
6
end
7 end
4.6
Random Restart
If the algorithm does not show enough improvement within a significant number of generations, we reinitialize
some individuals of the population with random values within the search space. We have evaluated the improvement over the immediate past 50 generations. If the improvement in the last 50 generations is less than or equal
to a threshold, t = 0.001, we initiate the random restart procedure.
7
5
Experimental Results
We have implemented GreMuTRRR in Java programming language using JDK 1.6 and have run our experiments
on an Intel 3.3GHz core i3 machine with 2GB RAM. We compared the performance of GreMuTRRR with a basic
genetic algorithm without considering the greedy mutation, twin removal and random restart. We denote this
algorithm as ‘Basic GA’ henceforth. Basic GA differs with GreMuTRRR given in Algorithm 1 in Lines 27–36 since
it does not contain twin removal and random restart and in Line 3, as the parameter greedyM utationRate = 0.0
for Basic GA. All other parameters were kept same for the sake of fair comparison.
5.1
Benchmark
We have considered two sets of protein instances for our experiments: one considering only the backbone atoms
(backbone only) and another containing all atoms (full atomic). These are larger protein benchmarks introduced
in [18]. We extracted the structures from PDB website [19] and have calculated the distance among pair of
atoms. Lower and upper bounds of the distances are calculated using the following equation:
lij = (1 − )dˆij , uij = (1 + )dˆij
(3)
Here, dˆij is the real distance between point ci and point cj in the known structure of the protein sequence and
= 0.8. To make the dataset sparse, we took only 30% of the distances that are less or equal to 6Å.
5.2
Results
The largest distance error (LDE) values for our algorithm and Basic GA for backbone only instances and full
atomic instances are given in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively. Each protein is reported with its corresponding
PDB id and number of atoms in the structure considered.
Table 1: Best Fitness for population size 50 with run of 2000 generations(with backbone atoms only)
Protein Id
V
Basic GA GreMuTRRR
1PTQ
50
0.49546
0.44977
1LFB
77
0.18060
0.13360
1F39
101
0.06595
0.02051
1AX8
130
0.06064
0.00253
1RGS
264
0.12380
0.00297
1TOA
277
0.12993
0.00156
1KDH
356
0.19119
0.00458
1BPM
481
0.34434
0.00441
1MQQ
679
0.58863
0.00894
8
Table 2: Best Fitness for population size 50 with run of 1500 generations(including all atoms)
Protein Id
V
Basic GA GreMuTRRR
1PTQ
402
0.71000
0.17224
1LFB
641
0.97121
0.31463
1F39
767
1.81091
0.16805
1AX8
1003
2.52303
0.43211
Figure 1: Search progress for two algorithms for the protein 1AX8.
5.3
Analysis
From the results presented in the tables it is evident that for both of the instances GreMuTRRR achieves better
solutions compared to the Basic GA algorithm for the proteins. However, the improvement is more clearly shown
in Figure 1. GreMuTRRR significantly lowers the objective function LDE before both algorithms gets stuck and
can not improve further. Its interesting to note thatGreMuTRRR is able to converge very early (≤ 50 generation)
compared to the Basic GA.
6
Conclusion
In this paper, we presented a new genetic algorithm to solve the molecular distance geometry for protein structure
determination problem using NMR data. We use a greedy mutation operator to intensify the search, a twin
removal technique for diversification in the population and a random restart method to recover stagnation. On
a standard set of benchmark dataset, our algorithm significantly outperforms standard genetic algorithms. In
future, we want to implement a web service based on our method and make it public to be used by biologists.
References
[1] M. Souza, C. Lavor, A. Muritiba, and N. Maculan, “Solving the molecular distance geometry problem with
inaccurate distance data,” BMC bioinformatics, vol. 14, no. Suppl 9, p. S7, 2013.
[2] L. Liberti, C. Lavor, N. Maculan, and A. Mucherino, “Euclidean distance geometry and applications,” SIAM
Review, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–69, 2014.
[3] D. Wu and Z. Wu, “An updated geometric build-up algorithm for solving the molecular distance geometry
problems with sparse distance data,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 661–673, 2007.
9
[4] A. Mucherino, L. Liberti, C. Lavor, and N. Maculan, “Comparisons between an exact and a metaheuristic
algorithm for the molecular distance geometry problem,” in Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on
Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, 2009, pp. 333–340.
[5] L. Liberti, C. Lavor, A. Mucherino, and N. Maculan, “Molecular distance geometry methods: from continuous to discrete,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2011.
[6] J. J. Moré and Z. Wu, “Distance geometry optimization for protein structures,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 219–234, 1999.
[7] C. Lavor, L. Liberti, and N. Maculan, “Computational experience with the molecular distance geometry
problem,” in Global Optimization. Springer, 2006, pp. 213–225.
[8] G. M. Crippen and T. F. Havel, Distance geometry and molecular conformation.
Taunton, UK, 1988, vol. 74.
Research Studies Press
[9] C. Savarese, J. M. Rabaey, and J. Beutel, “Location in distributed ad-hoc wireless sensor networks,” in
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2001. Proceedings.(ICASSP’01). 2001 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 4. IEEE, 2001, pp. 2037–2040.
[10] D. Tolani, A. Goswami, and N. I. Badler, “Real-time inverse kinematics techniques for anthropomorphic
limbs,” Graphical models, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 353–388, 2000.
[11] J. B. Tenenbaum, V. De Silva, and J. C. Langford, “A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2319–2323, 2000.
[12] J. J. Moré and Z. Wu, “Global continuation for distance geometry problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 814–836, 1997.
[13] L. Liberti and S. Kucherenko, “Comparison of deterministic and stochastic approaches to global optimization,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 263–285, 2005.
[14] L. Liberti and M. Drazic, “Variable neighbourhood search for the global optimization of constrained nlps,”
in Proceedings of GO Workshop, Almeria, Spain, vol. 2005, 2005.
[15] L. Liberti, C. Lavor, N. Maculan, and F. Marinelli, “Double variable neighbourhood search with smoothing
for the molecular distance geometry problem,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 207–218,
2009.
[16] Q. Dong and Z. Wu, “A geometric build-up algorithm for solving the molecular distance geometry problem
with sparse distance data,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 321–333, 2003.
[17] B. Hendrickson, “The molecule problem: Exploiting structure in global optimization,” SIAM Journal on
Optimization, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 835–857, 1995.
[18] P. Biswas, K.-C. Toh, and Y. Ye, “A distributed sdp approach for large-scale noisy anchor-free graph
realization with applications to molecular conformation,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 30,
no. 3, pp. 1251–1277, 2008.
[19] H. M. Berman, J. D. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E.
Bourne, “The protein data bank,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 2000.
10
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1705.00465v1 [math.ST] 1 May 2017
Maximum likelihood estimators based on the block
maxima method
Clément Dombry
Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté,
Laboratoire de Mathématiques de Besançon,
UMR CNRS 6623, 16 route de Gray, 25030 Besançon cedex, France.
Email: [email protected]
and
Ana Ferreira∗
Instituto Superior Técnico,
Universidade de Lisboa,
Av. Rovisco Pais 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.
Email: [email protected]
May 2, 2017
Abstract
The extreme value index is a fundamental parameter in univariate Extreme Value
Theory (EVT). It captures the tail behavior of a distribution and is central in the
extrapolation beyond observed data. Among other semi-parametric methods (such
as the popular Hill’s estimator), the Block Maxima (BM) and Peaks-Over-Threshold
(POT) methods are widely used for assessing the extreme value index and related
normalizing constants. We provide asymptotic theory for the maximum likelihood
estimators (MLE) based on the BM method. Our main result is the asymptotic
normality of the MLE with a non-trivial bias depending on the extreme value index
and on the so-called second order parameter. Our approach combines asymptotic
expansions of the likelihood process and of the empirical quantile process of block
maxima. The results permit to complete the comparison of most common semiparametric estimators in EVT (MLE and probability weighted moment estimators
based on the POT or BM methods) through their asymptotic variances, biases and
optimal mean square errors.
Key words: asymptotic normality, block maxima method, extreme value index,
maximum likelihood estimator, peaks-over-threshold method, probability weighted
moment estimator.
AMS Subject classification: 62G32, 62G20, 62G30.
1
1
Introduction
The Block Maxima (BM) method, also known as Annual Maxima, after Gumbel [11]
is a fundamental method in Extreme Value Theory and has been widely used. The
method is justified under the Maximum Domain of Attraction (MDA) condition: for
an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) sample with distribution function
F , if the linearly normalized partial maxima converges in distribution, then the
limit must be a Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution. In practice, one
rarely exactly knows F but the MDA condition holds for most common continuous
distributions.
In the BM method, the initial sample is divided into blocks of the same size
and the MDA condition ensures that the block maxima are approximately GEV
distributed. The method is commonly used in hydrology and other environmental
applications or in insurance and finance when analysing extremes - see e.g. the
monographs by Embrechts et al. [9], Coles [5], Beirlant et al. [2], de Haan and
Ferreira [6] and references therein.
The GEV is a three parameter distribution, with the usual location and scale parameters, and the extreme value index being the main parameter as it characterizes
the heaviness of the tail. Several estimation methods have been proposed, including
the classical maximum likelihood (ML) and probability weighted moments (PWM)
estimators (Hosking et al. [13]). The asymptotic study of these estimators has been
established for a sample from the GEV distribution and asymptotic normality holds
with null bias and explicit variance (Prescott and Walden [15], Hosking et al. [13],
Smith [17], Bücher and Segers [4]). The theory is made quite difficult and technical
by the fact that the support of the GEV is varying with respect to its parameters.
Regularity in quadratic mean of the GEV model has been proven only recently by
Bücher and Segers [4] and we provide here a different and somewhat simpler proof
(cf. Proposition 4.1).
However, in applications, the sample block maxima are only approximately GEV
so that the classical parametric theory suffers from model misspecification. In this
paper, we intend to fill this gap for ML estimators (MLE), by showing asymptotic
normality under a flexible second order condition (a refinement of the MDA condition). Depending on the asymptotic block size, a non trivial bias may appear in the
limit for which we provide an exact expression. Recently Ferreira and de Haan [10]
showed asymptotic normality of the PWM estimators under the same conditions.
They derived a uniform expansion for the empirical quantile of block maxima that is
a crucial tool in our approach as well. Indeed, the MLE can be seen as a maximizer
of the so-called likelihood process. Expressing the likelihood process in terms of
this empirical quantile process, we are able to derive an expansion of the likelihood
process that implies the asymptotic normality of the MLE. This derivation is again
made quite technical by the fact that the support of the GEV is varying. Note that
the asymptotic normality for the MLE of a Fréchet distribution based on the block
maxima of a stationary heavy-tailed time series has been obtained by Bücher and
Segers [3]. There the issue of parameter dependent supports is avoided but time
dependence has to be dealt with. Besides, the ideas underlying their proof are quite
different.
The asymptotic normality result in the present paper brings novel results to
the theoretical comparison of the main semi-parametric estimation procedures in
EVT. On the one hand it permits to compare BM and Peaks-over-Threshold (POT)
2
methods (see e.g. Balkema and de Haan [1], Pickands [14]), the latter being another
fundamental method in EVT and concurrent with BM. We discuss and compare the
four different approaches – MLE/PWM estimators in the BM/POT approaches –
based on exact theoretical formulas for asymptotic variances, biases and optimal
mean square errors depending on the extreme value index and the second order
parameter. It turns out that MLE under BM has minimal asymptotic variance
among all combinations MLE/PWM and BM/POT but, on the other hand it has
some significant asymptotic bias. When analysing the asymptotic optimal mean
square error that balances variance and bias, the most efficient combination turns
out to be MLE under POT (e.g. Drees, Ferreira and de Haan 2004). It turns out
that the optimal sample size is larger for POT-MLE than for BM-MLE, giving a
theoretical justification to the heuristic that POT allows for a better use of the data
than BM.
The outline of the paper is as follows: In Section 2 we present the main theoretical conditions and results including Theorem 2.2 giving the asymptotic normality of
the MLE. In Section 3 we present a comparative study of asymptotic variances and
biases, optimal asymptotic mean square errors and optimal samples sizes among all
combinations MLE/PWM and BM/POT. In Section 4 we state additional theoretical statements, including the local asymptotic normality of MLE under the fully
parametric GEV model, and provide all the proofs. Finally, Appendix A gathers
some formulas for the information matrix and for the bias of BM-MLE and Appendix B provides useful bounds for the derivatives of the likelihood function that
are necessary for the main proofs.
2
2.1
Asymptotic behaviour of MLE
Framework and notations
The GEV distribution with index γ is defined by
Gγ (x) = exp −(1 + γx)−1/γ ,
1 + γx > 0,
and the corresponding log-likelihood by
−(1 + 1/γ) log(1 + γx) − (1 + γx)−1/γ
gγ (x) =
−∞ otherwise.
if 1 + γx > 0
(2.1)
For γ = 0, the formula is interpreted as g0 (x) = −x−exp(−x). The three parameter
model with index γ, location µ and scale σ > 0 is defined by the log-likelihood
x−µ
`(θ, x) = gγ
− log σ, θ = (γ, µ, σ).
(2.2)
σ
A distribution F is said to belong to the max-domain of attraction of the extreme
value distribution Gγ0 , denoted by F ∈ D(Gγ0 ), if there exist normalizing sequences
am > 0 and bm such that
lim F m (am x + bm ) = Gγ0 (x),
m→+∞
for all x ∈ R.
The main aim of the BM method is to estimate the extreme value index γ as well
as the normalizing constants am and bm . The set-up is the following. Consider
3
independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables (Xi )i≥1 with common distribution function F ∈ D(Gγ0 ). Divide the sequence (Xi )i≥1 into blocks of
length m ≥ 1 and define the k-th block maximum by
Mk,m =
max
(k−1)m<i≤km
Xi ,
k ≥ 1.
(2.3)
For each m ≥ 1, the variables (Mk,m )k≥1 are i.i.d. with distribution function F m
and by the max-domain of attraction condition
Mk,m − bm d
−→ Gγ0
am
as m → +∞.
(2.4)
This suggests that the distribution of Mk,m is approximately a GEV distribution
with parameters (γ0 , bm , am ). The method consists in pretending that the sample
follows exactly the GEV distribution and in maximizing the GEV log-likelihood so
as to compute the MLE. A particular feature of the method is that the model is
clearly misspecified since the GEV distribution appears as the limit distribution of
the block maxima as the block size m tends to +∞ while in practice we have to
use a finite block size. As seen afterwards, we quantify the misspecification thanks
to the so-called second order condition that implies an asymptotic expansion of
the empirical quantile process with a non trivial bias term. When plugging this
expansion in the ML equations, we obtain a bias term for the likelihood process as
well as for the MLE.
The (misspecified) log-likelihood of the k-sample (M1,m , . . . , Mk,m ) is
Lk,m (θ) =
k
X
`(θ, Mi,m ),
θ = (γ, µ, σ) ∈ Θ = R × R × (0, +∞).
(2.5)
i=1
We say that an estimator θbn = (b
γn , µ
bn , σ
bn ) is a
∂
∂γ Lk,m (γ, µ, σ)
∂
∂µ Lk,m (γ, µ, σ)
∂ L (γ, µ, σ)
∂σ k,m
MLE if it solves the score equations
= 0
= 0
= 0,
which we write shortly in vectorial notation
∂Lk,m
(θ) = 0.
∂θ
(2.6)
A main purpose of this paper is to study the existence and asymptotic normality of
the MLE under the following conditions:
• First order condition:
1
F ∈ D(Gγ0 ) with γ0 > − .
2
Note that the also called first order condition (2.4) is equivalent to
V (mx) − V (m)
xγ0 − 1
=
,
m→∞
am
γ0
lim
x > 0,
with V = (−1/ log F )← . W.l.g., we can take bm = V (m) in Equation 2.4,
what we shall assume in the following.
4
• Second order condition: for some positive function a and some positive or
negative function A with limt→∞ A(t) = 0,
lim
t→∞
V (tx)−V (t)
a(t)
−
xγ0 −1
γ0
A(t)
Z
x
γ0 −1
Z
s
s
=
uρ−1 duds = Hγ0 ,ρ (x),
x > 0, (2.7)
1
1
with γ0 > − 21 . Note that necessarily ρ ≤ 0 and |A| is regularly varying with
index ρ.
• Asymptotic growth for the number k of blocks and the block size m:
√
k = kn → ∞, m = mn → ∞ and kA(m) → λ ∈ R, as n → ∞.
2.2
(2.8)
Main results
Before considering the MLE, we focus on the asymptotic properties of the likelihood
and score processes. For the purpose of asymptotic we introduce the local parameter
h = (h1 , h2 , h3 ) ∈ R3 :
√
√
h1 = √k (γ − γ0 )
γ = γ0 + h1 / k √
⇔
(2.9)
h = √k(µ − bm )/am
µ = bm + am h2 /√ k
2
k (σ/am − 1)
σ = am (1 + h3 / k).
h3 =
Set θ0 = (γ0 , 0, 1). The local log-likelihood process at θ0 is given by
h1
h2
h3
e k,m (h) = Lk,m γ0 + √
L
, bm + am √ , am + am √
k
k
k
k
X
h Mi,m − bm
− k log(am ),
=
` θ0 + √ ,
am
k
(2.10)
i=1
and, the local score process by
e k,m
∂L
(h) =
∂h
=
k
1 X ∂`
h Mi,m − bm
√
θ0 + √ ,
am
k i=1 ∂θ
k
1 ∂Lk,m
√
(θ).
k ∂θ
(2.11)
e
∂L
k,m
Clearly, the score equation (2.6) rewrites in this new variable as ∂h
(h) = 0.
In the following, Qγ0 denote the quantile function of the extreme value distribution Gγ0 , i.e.
(− log s)−γ0 − 1
Qγ0 (s) =
, s ∈ (0, 1).
(2.12)
γ0
Proposition 2.1. Assume conditions (2.7) and (2.8). Let r = rn → ∞ be a
sequence of positive numbers verifying, as n → ∞,
rn = O(knδ )
with
0 < δ < min(1/2, γ0 + 1/2).
(2.13)
Let Hn ⊂ R3 be the ball of center 0 and radius rn . Then, uniformly for h ∈ Hn ,
e k,m
∂2L
(h) = −Iθ0 + oP (1)
∂h∂hT
5
(2.14)
with Iθ0 the Fisher information matrix
Z 1
∂2`
Iθ0 = −
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) ds.
T
0 ∂θ∂θ
(2.15)
e k,m is strictly concave on Hn with
As a consequence, the local log-likelihood process L
high probability.
Remark 2.1. The conditions in Proposition
2.1 are sufficient for consistency of
√
MLE, see Dombry [7]. In particular kA(m) → λ ∈ R implies m/ log n → ∞, the
later required for consistency. When γ0 ≥ 0, condition (2.13) implies that (2.14)
holds for h = o(k 1/2−ε ), ε > 0.
Our main result is the following Theorem establishing the asymptotic behavior of
the local likelihood process and from which the existence and asymptotic normality
of MLE will be deduced.
Theorem 2.1. Assume conditions (2.7) and (2.8). Then, the local likelihood process
satisfies uniformly for h in compact sets
e k,m − 1 hT Iθ h + oP (1),
e k,m (h) = L
e k,m (0) + hT G
L
0
2
e k,m
∂L
e k,m − Iθ h + oP (1),
(h) = G
0
∂h
where
k
Mi,m − bm
1 X ∂`
d
e
Gk,m = √
θ0 ,
−→ N (λb, Iθ0 )
am
k i=1 ∂θ
(2.16)
(2.17)
(2.18)
i.e., is asymptotically Gaussian with variance equal to the information matrix and
mean depending on the second order condition (2.7) through
Z 1 2
∂ `
1
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Hγ0 ,ρ
ds
(2.19)
b = b(γ0 , ρ) =
− log s
0 ∂x∂θ
and on the asymptotic block size through λ from (2.8).
Remark 2.2. Explicit formulas for the Fisher information matrix Iθ0 have been
given by Prescott and Walden [15] (see also Beirlant et al. [2] page 169). The
vector b given by the integral representation (2.19) can also be computed explicitly.
Formulas are provided in Appendix A.
Remark 2.3. Equation (2.8) requires that both the number of blocks k and the
block size m go to infinity with a relative rate measured by the second order scaling
function A and a parameter λ. When λ = 0, the bias term disappears in (2.18); this
corresponds to the situation where m grows to infinity very quickly with respect to
k so that the block size is large enough and the GEV approximation (2.4) is very
good.
Existence and asymptotic normality of the MLE can be deduced from Theorem 2.1, mainly by the argmax theorem. The concavity property stated in Proposition 2.1 plays an important role in the proof of existence and uniqueness.
Theorem 2.2. Assume conditions (2.7) and (2.8).
6
(a) There exists a sequence of estimators θbn = (b
γn , µ
bn , σ
bn ), n ≥ 1, such that
h
i
lim P θbn is a MLE = 1
(2.20)
n→+∞
and
√
µ
bn − bm σ
bn
d
k γ
bn − γ0 ,
,
− 1 −→ N (λIθ−1
b, Iθ−1
).
0
0
am
am
(2.21)
(b) If θbni = (b
γni , µ
bin , σ
bni ), i = 1, 2,are two sequences of estimators satisfying
h
i
lim P θbni is a MLE = 1
n→+∞
and
lim P
n→+∞
√
µ
bin − bm σ
bni
i
k γ
bn − γ0 ,
,
− 1 ∈ Hn = 1,
am
am
then θbn1 and θbn2 are equal with high probability, i.e.
h
i
lim P θbn1 = θbn2 = 1.
n→+∞
Remark 2.4. An interesting by-product of the strict concavity stated in Proposition 2.1 is the convergence of numerical procedures for the computation of the MLE
that are implemented in software. The Newton-Raphson algorithm is commonly
used to solve numerically the score equation (2.6). Strict concavity of the objective
function on a large neighbourhood of the solution ensures convergence of the algorithm with high probability as soon as the initial value θ = (γ, µ, σ) belongs to this
neighbourhood.
3 Theoretical comparisons: BM vs POT and
MLE vs PWM
The POT method uses observations above some high threshold or top order statistic and the underlying approximate model is the Generalized Pareto distribution
(Balkema and de Haan [1], Pickands [14]). Estimators of the shape parameter γ,
as well as location and scale parameters have been proposed and widely studied,
including MLE and PWM (Hosking and Wallis [12]). For their asymptotic properties - under basically the same conditions as under BM in Theorem 2.2 - we refer
to de Haan and Ferreira [6]. Asymptotic normality of PWM estimators under BM
has been established only recently by Ferreira and de Haan [10] and a comparison
of PWM estimators under BM and POT has been carried out. The aim of the
present section is to include our new asymptotic results for MLE estimators under
BM, completing the picture in the comparison of the four different cases BM/POT
and MLE/PWM.
Recall that asymptotic normality of MLE (resp. PWM estimator) holds for
γ > −1/2 (resp. γ < 1/2). The number k of selected observations corresponds to
the number of blocks in BM and of selected top order statistics in POT. Similarly
as in Ferreira and de Haan [10], our comparative study is restricted to the range ρ ∈
[−1, 0] where second order conditions for BM and POT are comparable (cf. Drees et
al. [8] or Ferreira and de Haan [10]). In the following we compare MLE/PWM under
BM/POT methods through their: (i) asymptotic variances (VAR), (ii) asymptotic
biases (BIAS), (iii) optimal asymptotic mean square errors (AMSE) and optimal
number of observations minimizing AMSE (k0 ).
7
Var
6
5
VarPOTpwm
4
VarPOTmle
3
VarBMpwm
VarBMmle
2
1
-1.0
-0.5
0.5
1.0
gamma
Figure 1: Asymptotic variances of estimators of the extreme value index γ. The straight
lines corresponds to the MLE under BM and POT while the dashed lines correspond to
PWM under BM and POT.
POT mle
BM mle
Figure 2: Asymptotic bias of estimators of the extreme value index γ: blue color for BM
and orange for POT.
(i) Asymptotic variances
The asymptotic variance depends on γ only and is plotted in Figure 1 where straight
lines stand for MLE and dashed lines for PWM estimators. Among all four different
cases, BM-MLE is the one with the smallest variance within its range. Moreover,
for both estimators, BM has the lowest variance indicating that BM is preferable
to POT when variance is concerned.
(ii) Asymptotic biases
The asymptotic biases depend on γ and ρ and are shown in Figures 2–3: POT-MLE
is the one with the smallest bias also in absolute value when compared to BM-MLE,
contrary to what was observed for variance. This is in agreement with what has
been observed when comparing BM-PWM and POT-PWM, also shown in Figures
2–3 already analysed in Ferreira and de Haan [10]. There is again the indication
that POT method is favourable to BM when concerning bias.
(iii) Optimal asymptotic MSEs and optimal number of observations
Another way to compare the estimators that combines both variance and bias information is through mean square error. One can compare these for the optimal
number of observations k0 i.e., that value for which the asymptotic mean square
error (AMSE) is minimal. Similarly as in Ferreira and de Haan [10], under the
8
(a) MLE
(b) PWM
Figure 3: Ratios of asymptotic bias: BIASP OT /BIASBM .
POT
POT
BM
BM
0.9
0.4
0.1
1
0.8
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.0
gamma
gamma
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.6
1.4
-0.2
1.2
-0.4
0.0
-0.6
0.7
-0.2
1.3
-0.8
-0.4
0.2
0.5
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
1.1
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
-1.0
rho
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
rho
(a) MLE
(b) PWM
Figure 4: Contour plot of ratios of optimal AMSE: AMSEP OT /AMSEBM .
conditions of Theorem 2.2, we have
k0 ∼
n
1 ←
(n)
s
VAR2 (γ)
BIAS2 (γ, ρ)
1/(1−2ρ)
,
n → ∞,
2
with
R ∞ s(·) a decreasing and 2ρ − 1 regularly varying function such that A (t) =
t s(u) du. It follows in particular that the optimal k0 is different but of the same
order for both estimators and methods. As for the optimal AMSE, we have
AMSE ∼
1/(1−2ρ)
1 − 2ρ (1/s)← (n)
BIAS2 (γ, ρ)
(VAR(γ))−2ρ/(1−2ρ) ,
−2ρ
n
n → ∞.
When considering ratios of optimal AMSE (or optimal number k0 of selected observations), the regularly varying function cancels out and the asymptotic ratio does
not depend on n but only on γ and ρ.
Figure 4 shows the contour plots of the ratio AMSEP OT /AMSEBM for MLE
and PWM estimators. It is surprising to see a reverse behaviour in both cases: in
the range of parameters considered, POT is preferable when MLE are considered,
while BM is mostly preferable for PWM estimators.
1/(1−2ρ)
In Figure 5 are shown BIAS2 (γ, ρ)
(VAR(γ))−2ρ/(1−2ρ) for comparing
optimal AMSE among all combinations. The green surface corresponds to MLEPOT that has always the minimal optimal AMSE in the range of parameters considered. Finally, Figure 6 reports for MLE the asymptotic ratio of optimal numbers
9
k0POT/k0BM
20
10
0.4
30
15
5
gamma
0.2
0.0
-0.2
25
-0.4
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
Figure 5: Comparison of optimal AMSE: the
lowest green surface corresponds to MLE-Figure 6: Asymptotic ratio of optimal sizes:
POT.
k0,P OT /k0,BM .
rho
of selected observations, that is k0,P OT /k0,BM . We can see that the optimal number of observations is larger for POT, which is in agreement with the PWM case
considered in previous studies.
4
Main proofs
We start by introducing some material that will be useful for the proofs. More
technical material is still postponed to Appendices.
4.1
Local asymptotic normality of the GEV model
If the observations (Xi )i≥1 are exactly GEV(γ0 , µ0 , σ0 ) distributed, then the choice
of constants
mγ0 − 1
am = σ0 mγ0 and bm = µ0 + σ0
(4.1)
γ0
ensures that the normalised block maxima ((Mi,m − bm )/am )k≥1 are i.i.d. with
distribution Gγ0 . The issue of model misspecification is irrelevant in that particular
case.
In this simple i.i.d. setting, a key property in the theory of ML estimation is
differentiability in quadratic mean (see e.g. van der Vaart [18, Chapter 7]). A statistical model defined by the family of densities {pθ (x), θ ∈ Θ} is called differentiable
in quadratic mean at the point θ0 if there exists a measurable function `˙θ0 called
the score function such that
2
Z q
q
q
1 T˙
pθ0 +h (x) − pθ0 (x) − h `θ0 (x) pθ0 (x) dx = o(khk2 ), as h → 0.
2
R
The following Proposition corresponds to Proposition 3.2 in Bücher and Segers [4].
We provide a slightly different proof in the case −1/2 < γ0 ≤ −1/3.
Proposition 4.1. The three parameter GEV model with log-likelihood `(θ, x) defined
in Equation (2.2) is differentiable in quadratic mean at θ0 = (γ0 , σ0 , µ0 ) ∈ Θ if and
∂`
only if γ0 > −1/2. The score function is then given by `˙θ0 (x) = ∂θ
(θ0 , x).
Proof of Proposition 4.1. The density of the 3-parameter GEV model is given by
!
x − µ −1−1/γ
x − µ −1/γ
pθ (x) = 1 + γ
exp − 1 + γ
σ
σ
10
if 1 + γ x−µ
σ > 0 and 0 otherwise. In the case γ0 > −1/3, the function
θ ∈ (−1/3, +∞) × R × (0, +∞) 7→
p
pθ (x)
is continuously differentiable for every x ∈ R and the information matrix θ 7→ Iθ
is well defined and continuous (see Appendix A or Beirlant et al. [2] page 169).
Differentiability in quadratic mean of the GEV model follows by a straightforward
application of Lemma 7.6 in Van der Vaart [18].
p
In the case γ0 ∈ (−1/2, −1/3], the function θ 7→ pθ (x) is not differentiable at
points such that 1 + γ x−µ
σ = 0. Going back to the definition of differentiability in
quadratic mean, we need to show that
#2
p
p
Z "p
∂`
(θ0 , x) pθ0 (x)
pθ0 +h (x) − pθ0 (x) − 12 hT ∂θ
lim
dx = 0.
h→0 R
khk
(4.2)
This is credible because for all x 6= µ − σ/γ, the relation
p
q
∂ pθ (x)
1 ∂`
=
(θ0 , x) pθ0 (x)
∂θ
2 ∂θ
θ=θ0
entails
p
p
p
∂`
(θ0 , x) pθ0 (x)
pθ0 +h (x) − pθ0 (x) − 21 hT ∂θ
lim
= 0.
h→0
khk
For further reference, we note also that, for x 6= µ − σ/γ,
p
q
∂ 2 pθ (x)
1
∂`
∂`
1
∂2`
=
p
(x)
(θ
,
x)
(θ
,
x)
+
p
(x)
(θ0 , x).
0
0
θ
θ0
∂θ∂θT θ=θ0
4 0
∂θ
∂θT
2
∂`θ∂θT
(4.3)
A rigorous proof of (4.2) is given below. Since γ0 < 0, we have γ0 + h < 0 for
h = (h1 , h2 , h3 ) in a neighbourhood of 0 so that the density pθ0 +h vanishes outside
(−∞, xh ) with xh = (µ0 + h2 ) − (σ0 + h3 )/(γ0 + h1 ) the right endpoint of the distribution GEV(γ0 +h1 , µ0 +h2 , σ0 +h3p
). We also introduce xh = min0≤u≤1 xuh . For all
x < xh , the function u ∈ [0, 1] 7→ pθ0 +uh (x) is twice continuously differentiable,
whence Taylor formula entails
!
p
q
q
q
1 T ∂`
1 T ∂ 2 pθ (x)
pθ0 +h (x) − pθ0 (x) − h
(θ0 , x) pθ0 (x) = h
h
2 ∂θ
2
∂θ∂θT θ=θ0 +vh
for some v = v(h, x) ∈ [0, 1]. Together with Equation (4.3), the formula (a + b)2 ≤
2(a2 + b2 ) and Proposition B.1, this yields the upper bound
"p
#2
p
p
∂`
(θ0 , x) pθ0 (x)
pθ0 +h (x) − pθ0 (x) − 12 hT ∂θ
khk
"
4
2 #
2
1
2
T ∂`
T ∂ `
≤
pθ0 +vh (x) h
(θ0 + vh, x) + 4pθ0 +vh (x) h
(θ0 + vh, x)h
32khk2
∂θ
∂θ∂θT
h
≤Ckhk2 pθ0 +vh (x)2 max(z(θ0 + vh, x)γ0 −ε , z(θ0 + vh, x)1+ε )4
i
+ pθ0 +vh (x) max(z(θ0 + vh, x)2γ0 −ε , z(θ0 + vh, x)1+ε )2
11
for all x < xh and h small enough. This entails
#2
p
p
Z xh " p
∂`
(θ0 , x) pθ0 (x)
pθ0 +h (x) − pθ0 (x) − 21 hT ∂θ
dx = 0.
lim
h→0 −∞
khk
(4.4)
It remains to estimate the contribution of the integral between xh and +∞. Recall
that pθ0 +h (x) vanishes for x ≥ xh . We have
2
Z +∞ q
1
x h − µ0
1
pθ0 (x) dx =
1 − Gγ0
,
khk2 xh
khk2
σ0
2
Z +∞ q
1
xh − µ0 − h2
1
1 − Gγ0 +h1
,
pθ0 +h (x) dx =
khk2 xh
khk2
σ0 + h3
2
Z +∞
Z x0
q
2
1
∂`
T ∂`
h
p
(x)
(θ
,
x)
dx
≤
(θ
,
x)
pθ0 (x)dx.
0
0
θ
0
khk2 xh
∂θ
∂θ
xh
The first and second integral converge to 0 as h → 0 because xh − x0 = O(khk) and
γ0 > −1/2. The third integral converges also to 0 because xh → x0 and γ0 > −1/2
so that the score is square integrable (its covariance matrix is Iθ0 ). We deduce
#2
p
p
Z +∞ " p
∂`
pθ+h (x) − pθ (x) − 12 hT ∂θ
(θ, x) pθ (x)
dx = 0.
(4.5)
lim
h→0 x
khk
h
Equations (4.4) and (4.5) imply (4.2).
The fact that differentiability in quadratic mean does not hold when γ0 ≤ −1/2
is proved in Bücher and Segers [4] Appendix C. They observe that for γ0 ≤ −1/2,
Z +∞
−2
lim inf khk
1{pθ0 (x)=0} pθ0 +h (x)dx > 0
h→0
R
which rules out differentiability in quadratic mean. We omit further details here.
Differentiability in quadratic mean implies that the score function is centered
with finite variance equal to the information matrix, i.e.
Z
Z
˙`θ (x)pθ (x)dx = 0 and
`˙θ0 (x)`˙θ0 (x)T pθ0 (x)dx = Iθ0 .
(4.6)
0
0
R
R
Another important consequence of differentiability in quadratic mean is the local
asymptotic normality property of the local score process. The following Corollary
follows from Proposition 4.1 by a direct application of Theorem 7.2 in Van der Vaart
[18].
Corollary 4.1. Assume that F = GEV(γ0 , µ0 , σ0 ) with γ0 > −1/2 and that the
constants am > 0, bm ∈ R are given by (4.1). Then the local log-likelihood process
(2.10) satisfies
1 T
ee
e k,m (h) = L
e k,m (0) + hT G
L
k,m − h Iθ0 h + oP (1)
2
where
k
Mi,m − bm
1 X ∂`
d
ee
Gk,m = √
θ0 ,
−→ N (0, Iθ0 ).
am
k i=1 ∂θ
Note the similarity between Theorem 2.1 and Corollary 4.1. In Theorem 2.1
however, the oP (1) is uniform on compact sets and the model misspecification F ∈
e k,m .
D(Gγ0 ) results in a bias term λb for the asymptotic distribution G
12
4.2
The empirical quantile process associated to BM
The starting point of the proof of Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.1 is to rewrite the
local log-likelihood process (2.10) in terms of the (normalized) empirical quantile
process
Mdkse:k,m − bm
Qk,m (s) =
, 0 < s < 1,
(4.7)
am
where M1:k,m ≤ · · · ≤ Mk:k,m are the order statistics of the block maxima sample
(Mk,m )1≤k≤m defined by (2.3) and dxe denotes the smallest integer larger than or
equal to x. The local log-likelihood process (2.10) can be rewritten as
Z 1
h
e
` θ0 + √ , Qk,m (s) ds.
Lk,m (h) = k
(4.8)
k
0
Convergence (2.4) ensures the convergence of the empirical quantile process Qk,m
to the “true” quantile function Qγ0 defined in (2.12). The following expansion of the
empirical quantile process is taken from Ferreira and de Haan [10], Theorem 2.1.
Proposition 4.2. Assume conditions (2.7) and (2.8). For a specific choice of the
second order auxiliary functions a and A in (2.7),
√
Bk (s)
1
k (Qk,m (s) − Qγ0 (s)) =
+ λHγ0 ,ρ
+ Rk,m (s)
(4.9)
s(− log s)γ0 +1
− log s
where Bk , k ≥ 1, denotes an appropriate sequence of standard Brownian bridges
and the remainder term Rk,m satisfies, for 0 < ε < 1/2,
Rk,m (s) = s−1/2−ε (1 − s)−1/2−γ0 −ρ−ε oP (1)
h
i
1
k
uniformly for s ∈ k+1
, k+1
.
(4.10)
Remark 4.1. For Proposition 4.2, the auxiliary functions a and A have to be specially chosen for establishing uniform second order regular variation bounds refining
(2.7), see Lemma 4.2 in [10]. However, this choice is useful for the proofs only and
is irrelevant for the statements of the main results in Section 2.2.
The following Proposition provides useful technical bounds for the proof of the
main results.
Proposition 4.3. Assume conditions (2.7) and (2.8). Then, as n → ∞,
√ !
√
Q
(s)
−
h
/
k
2
k,m
√
(− log s)γ0 1 + (γ0 + h1 / k)
= eOP (1)
1 + h3 / k
and
√
−1
(− log s)
uniformly for s ∈
√ !−1/(γ0 +h1 /
√ Qk,m (s) − h2 / k
√
1 + (γ0 + h1 / k)
1 + h3 / k
h
k
1
k+1 , k+1
i
k)
and h ∈ Hn as in Proposition 2.1.
For the proof of Proposition 4.3, we need the following Lemma.
13
= eOP (1)
Lemma 4.1. Let Z1:k < . . . < Zk:k be the order statistics of i.i.d random variables
Z1 , . . . , Zk with standard Fréchet distribution. Then,
log (− log s)Zdkse:k = OP (1)
where the OP (1)−term is uniform for s ∈
h
1
k
k+1 , k+1
i
.
Proof of Lemma 4.1. An equivalent statement is, with U standard uniform,
− log Udkse:k
= OP (1).
log
− log s
We use Shorack and Wellner [16] (inequality 1 on p.419): for some M > 1
Udkse:k
1
≤
≤M
M
s
for
1 − Udkse:k
1
≤
≤M
M
1−s
for
1
≤ s < 1,
k+1
0<s≤
k
.
k+1
(4.11)
(4.12)
Relation (4.11) implies, for s ≥ 1/(k + 1),
1−
− log Udkse:k
log M
log M
≤
≤1+
.
− log s
− log s
− log s
Both sides are bounded for 0 < s ≤ 1/2. Relation (4.12) implies, for s ≤ k/(k + 1),
− log Udkse:k
1 − s 1 − Udkse:k
≤
− log s 1 − s
− log s
− log 1 − 1 − Udkse:k
1 − Udkse:k
1
1−s
≤
≤
.
− log s
1−s
Udkse:k − log s
Both sides are bounded for 1/2 ≤ s < 1.
Proof of Proposition 4.3. Let Z be a unit Fréchet random variable, i.e. with distribution function F (x) = e−1/x , x > 0, and {Zi:k }ki=1 be the order statistics from the
associated i.i.d. sample of size k, Z1 , . . . , Zk . Note that Mi:k,m =d V (mZi:k ). From
Lemma 4.2 in [10],
1+γ
V (mZdkse:k ) − bm
a0 V (mZdkse:k ) − bm
=1+γ m
σ
σ
a0m
is bounded (above and below) by
γ0
Zdkse:k
0
Z γ0
am
a0
dkse:k − 1
γ0 +ρ±δ
+ γ
− γ0
+ γ m A0 (m)Hγ0 ,ρ Zdkse:k ± εZdkse:k
A0 (m)
σ
γ0
σ
for each ε, δ > 0 provided k and m are large enough. Hence,
a0m V (mZdkse:k ) − bm µ − bm
γ0
(− log s)
1+γ
−
σ
a0m
a0m
14
is bounded (above and below) by,
γ
(− log s)Zdkse:k 0 − (− log s)γ0
(− log s)Zdkse:k
γ0
0
a0
µ − bm
a
+ γ m A0 (m)(− log s)γ0 Hγ0 ,ρ Zdkse:k − γ m (− log s)γ0
σ
σ
a0m
γ0 ρ±δ
Zdkse:k A0 (m). (4.13)
± ε (− log s)Zdkse:k
γ0
a0
+ γ m − γ0
σ
Applying Lemma 4.1, the first term in (4.13) is bounded (above and below) uniformly in s, in probability.
It remains to verify that the other terms are op (1) uniformly in s. Note that
(
k)γ0
(− log s)γ0
O (log
,
γ0 > 0
k1/2−δ
sup
=
1/2−δ
−1/2−γ
+δ
0
k
O k
, γ0 ≤ 0.
(k+1)−1 ≤s≤k(k+1)−1
Using this with δ < min(1/2, γ0 + 1/2), Lemma 4.1 and (2.13), the second term in
(4.13) is op (1) uniformly in s. For the third term, by
√
(− log s)γ0
√
A0 (m)(− log s)γ0 Hγ0 ,ρ Zdkse,k = kA0 (m)
Hγ0 ,ρ Zdkse,k
k
and,
sup
(k+1)−1 ≤s≤k(k+1)−1
(− log s)γ0
√
Hγ0 ,ρ
k
1
− log s
= O (log k)ξ k −1/2−(γ0 ∨0)
for some ξ ∈ R, it follows that it is also op (1) uniformly in s. The last two terms
follow similarly.
For the second statement just note that
√
(− log s)−γ0 /(γ0 +h1 /
k)
= (− log s)−1 (− log s)h1 /(γ0
√
k)(1+o(1))
where the second factor converges to 1 uniformly in s.
The following auxiliary result closely related to Proposition 4.3 will be useful in
our proofs of Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.1.
Lemma 4.2. As n → ∞,
√
√ !−1/(γ0 +h1 / k)
Qγ (s) − h2 / k
√
(− log s)−1 1 + (γ0 + h1 / k) 0
= 1 + o(1),
1 + h3 / k
h
i
1
k
uniformly for s ∈ k+1
, k+1
and h ∈ Hn as in Proposition 2.1.
√
Proof. Using (2.9) and expanding,
√
Qγ0 (s) − h2 / k
√
1 + (γ0 + h1 / k)
1 + h3 / k
1 + (− log s)γ0
−γ0
√
= (− log s)
+ O max(h1 , h2 , h3 )
k
√
where the O-term is in fact a o-term uniformly in s as seen in the proof of Corollary
4.3. The result follows as in the last part of the proof of Corollary 4.3 for the second
statement.
15
4.3
Proofs of Proposition 2.1, Theorems 2.1 and 2.2
Before proving Proposition 2.1, we first check that, with high probability the local
e k,m is finite and twice differentiable on Hn .
log-likelihood process L
Lemma 4.3. Under the assumptions of Proposition 2.1, we have
i
h
e k,m (h) > −∞ for all h ∈ Hn = 1.
lim P L
n→∞
(4.14)
e k,m is smooth on Hn as soon as it is finite on Hn .
Furthermore, L
e k,m (h) is finite on Hn as soon
Proof. In view of Equations (2.1),(2.2) and (2.10), L
as
√
√ Qk,m (1/(k + 1)) − h2 / k
√
1 + (γ0 + h1 / k)
> 0 for all h = (h1 , h2 , h3 ) ∈ Hn .
1 + h3 / k
Proposition 4.3 entails that the left hand side is asymtptically (log k)−γ0 eOP (1) uniformly on Hn so that it remains positive on Hn with high probability. Equations
(2.1)-(2.2) imply that the function θ 7→ `(θ, x) is smooth when it is finite. We
e k,m is smooth on Hn as soon as it is finite on Hn .
deduce that L
Proof of Proposition 2.1. According to Lemma 4.3, the local log-likelihood process
e k,m is smooth on Hn with high probability. Differentiating Equation (4.8), we get
L
e k,m
∂2L
(h) =
∂h∂hT
Z
1
0
∂2`
∂θ∂θT
h
θ0 + √ , Qk,m (s) ds.
k
By the definition (2.15) of the information matrix,
e k,m
∂2L
(h) + Iθ0
∂h∂hT
Z
1
=
0
Z
=
1
k
∂2`
∂θ∂θT
h
∂2`
θ0 + √ , Qk,m (s) −
(θ
,
Q
(s))
ds
0
γ0
∂θ∂θT
k
Z k−1
Z 1
k
(· · · ) ds +
(· · · ) ds +
(· · · ) ds
0
k−1
k
1
k
= I + II + III
We will show that these three terms are oP (1) uniformly on Hn , which proves
Equation (2.14).
First consider the boundary terms I and III. Since Qk,m (s) is constant on [0, k1 ],
we have
Z 1
k
1 ∂2`
1
h
∂2`
√
I=
θ
+
,
Q
−
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) ds
(4.15)
0
k,m
T
k ∂θ∂θT
k
k
0 ∂θ∂θ
The integral term vanishes as k → ∞ because the integral is well defined on [0, 1] (see
Eq. (2.15) or alternatively use the upper bound for the second derivative provided
by Proposition B.1). To deal with the first term, we use the upper bound for the
second derivative provided by Proposition B.1:
∂2`
h
1
θ0 + √ , Qk,m
≤ C max z −ε , z 1+ε , z 2γ0 −ε , z 1+2γ0 +ε
T
∂θ∂θ
k
k
16
with
1
h
z = z θ0 + √ , Qk,m
k
k
√
√ !−1/(γ0 +h1 /
Qk,m (1/k) − h2 / k
√
1 + (γ0 + h1 / k)
1 + h3 / k
√
=
k)
.
Corollary 4.3 with s = k1 provides the asymptotic z = eOP (1) log k uniformly for
h ∈ Hn . We deduce that the first term in (4.15) is asymptotically
1
eOP (1) max (log k)−ε , (log k)1+ε , (log k)2γ0 −ε , (log k)1+2γ0 +ε = oP (1)
k
uniformly for h ∈ Hn . Hence, I = oP (1) uniformly for h ∈ Hn . The proof for the
boundary term III is similar and details are omitted.
Next, consider the main term II. By Taylor formula, we have
Z k−1 2
k
h
∂ `
∂2`
θ0 + √ , Qk,m (s) −
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) ds
II =
1
∂θ∂θT
∂θ∂θT
k
k
= IIa + IIb
with
1
IIa = √
k
k−1
k
Z
IIb =
1
k
k−1
k
Z
1
k
Z
Z
0
1
∂3`
h 2
∂ θ∂θT
T
uh
θ0 + √ , (1 − u)Qγ0 (s) + uQk,m (s) duds (4.16)
k
1
(Qk,m (s)−Qγ0 (s))
0
∂3`
∂x∂θ∂θT
uh
θ0 + √ , (1 − u)Qγ0 (s) + uQk,m (s) duds
k
(4.17)
Using the notation z = z(θn0 , x0n ) with
uh
x0n = (1 − u)Qγ0 (s) + uQk,m (s) and θn0 = θ0 + √ ,
k
u ∈ [0, 1],
Proposition B.1 provides the upper bound
∂3`
θn0 , x0n ≤ C max z −ε , z 1+ε , z 3γ0 −ε , z 1+3γ0 +ε .
2
T
∂ θ∂θ
Using the fact that uh ∈ Hn and that z(θn0 , x0n ) is between z(θn0 , Qγ0 (s)) and
z(θn0 , Qk,m (s)), Proposition 4.3 and Lemma 4.2 imply
z = z(θn0 , x0n ) = eOP (1) (− log s)
uniformly for s ∈ [ k1 , k−1
k ], u ∈ [0, 1] and h ∈ Hn . Using these bounds, we obtain
∂3`
0
0
OP (1)
−ε
−ε
3γ0 −ε
θ
,
x
=
e
max
s
,
(1
−
s)
,
(1
−
s)
n
n
∂ 2 θ∂θT
and, since condition (2.13) implies khk = O(k δ ),
IIa = OP (k
δ−1/2
k−1
k
Z
)
max s−ε , (1 − s)−ε , (1 − s)3γ0 −ε ds.
1
k
17
When 3γ0 −ε > −1 the integral converges as k → ∞ and, IIa = OP (k δ−1/2 ) = oP (1)
since δ < 1/2. When γ0 ≤ −1/3, the integral diverges at rate O(k −1−3γ0 +ε ) so that
IIa = OP (k δ−3/2−3γ0 +ε ) = oP (1) since δ + ε < γ0 + 1/2.
Similarly for the term IIb , Propositions 4.3 and B.1 together with Lemma 4.2 imply
∂3`
θn0 , x0n ≤ C max z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε , z 3γ0 −ε , z 1+3γ0 +ε
T
∂x∂θ∂θ
≤ eOP (1) max (− log s)γ0 −ε , (− log s)1+γ0 +ε , (− log s)3γ0 −ε , (− log s)1+3γ0 +ε ,
uniformly for s ∈ [ k1 , k−1
k ], u ∈ [0, 1] and h ∈ Hn .
From the law of the iterated logarithm,
Bk (s) = Op s1/2−ε (1 − s)1/2−ε
uniformly on (0, 1)
(4.18)
and,
Hγ0 ,ρ
1
− log s
= O s−ε (1 − s)−ε+min(−γ0 ,0)
uniformly on (0, 1).
(4.19)
Combining these two with Proposition 4.2 it follows,
√
k (Qk,m (s) − Qγ0 (s)) = OP s−1/2−ε (1 − s)−1/2−γ0 −ε + s−ε (1 − s)min(−γ0 ,0)−ε
(4.20)
uniformly on (0, 1).
Combining the previous bound for the derivative and (4.20), we deduce similarly
as before
Z k−1
k
1
IIb = OP √
max(s−1/2−2ε , (1 − s)−1/2+2γ0 −2ε , (1 − s)3γ0 −2ε )ds = oP (1)
1
k
k
uniformly in h ∈ Hn for ε small enough.
Proof of Theorem 2.1. Integrating Equation (2.14), we obtain directly
e k,m
e k,m
∂L
∂L
(h) =
(0) − Iθ0 h + oP (1)
∂h
∂h
e
e k,m (h) = L
e k,m (0) + hT ∂ Lk,m (0) − 1 hT Iθ h + oP (1)
L
0
∂h
2
uniformly on compact sets. This is exactly Equations (2.16) and (2.17) since
k
e k,m
∂L
Mi,m − bm
1 X ∂`
e k,m .
(0) = √
θ0 ,
=G
∂h
am
k i=1 ∂θ
It remains to prove the asymptotic normality (2.18), i.e.
e k,m
∂L
(0) →d N (λb, Iθ0 ).
∂h
Differentiating Equation (4.8), we obtain
e k,m
√
∂L
(0) = k
∂h
Z
0
1
∂`
(θ0 , Qk,m (s)) ds = I0 + II0 + III0
∂θ
18
(4.21)
k−1
where the three terms correspond to the integrals on [0, k1 ], [ k1 , k−1
k ] and [ k , 1]
respectively. Since Qk,m (s) is constant on the first and last intervals, we have
1 ∂`
1
0
I =√
θ0 , Qk,m
k+1
k ∂θ
1 ∂`
k
0
III = √
θ0 , Qk,m
.
k+1
k ∂θ
The first term is evaluated thanks to Propositions B.1 and 4.3:
∂`
1
θ0 , Qk,m
≤ C max z −ε , z 1+ε , z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε
∂θ
k+1
with
−1/γ0
1
z = 1 + γ0 Qk,m
= eOP (1) log k,
k+1
whence we deduce
1
I0 = eOP (1) √ max((log k)1+ε , (log k)1+γ0 +ε ) = oP (1).
k
With similar arguments, one can prove III0 = oP (1).
For the second term, we use Taylor integral formula
∂`
∂`
∂2`
(θ0 , Qk,m (s)) =
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) +
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) (Qk,m (s) − Qγ0 (s))
∂θ
∂θ
∂x∂θ
Z 1
∂3`
2
+ (Qk,m (s) − Qγ0 (s))
(1 − u) 2 (θ0 , (1 − u)Qγ0 (s) + uQk,m (s)) du.
∂x ∂θ
0
√
From decomposition (4.9) for k(Qk,m (s) − Qγ0 (s)), we get
k−1
k
√ Z
II = k
0
1
k
∂`
(θ0 , Qk,m (s)) ds = II0a + II0b + II0c + II0d + II0e ,
∂θ
with
II0a
√ Z
= k
1
k
k−1
k
k−1
k
∂`
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) ds
∂θ
∂2`
Bk (s)
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s))
ds
1
∂x∂θ
s(− log s)γ0 +1
k
Z k−1 2
k
∂ `
1
0
IIc = λ
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Hγ0 ,ρ
ds
1
∂x∂θ
− log s
k
Z k−1 2
k
∂ `
II0d =
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Rk,m (s)ds
1
∂x∂θ
k
Z k−1 Z 1 √
k
∂3`
II0e =
k(Qk,m (s) − Qγ0 (s))2 (1 − u) 2 (θ0 , (1 − u)Qγ0 (s) + uQk,m (s)) duds.
1
∂x ∂θ
0
II0b =
Z
k
We consider the different terms successively. Equation (4.6) implies
Z 1
∂`
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) ds = 0
∂θ
0
19
so that
II0a
1
k
√ Z
=− k
0
√
∂`
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) ds − k
∂θ
Z
1
1− k1
∂`
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) ds.
∂θ
Proposition B.1 provides the upper bound
∂`
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s))
∂θ
≤ C max (− log s)−ε , (− log s)1+ε , (− log s)γ0 −ε , (− log s)1+γ0 +ε
≤ C max(s−ε , (1 − s)−ε , (1 − s)γ0 −ε ),
whence we deduce II0a = O(max(k −1/2+ε , k −1/2−γ0 +ε )) = o(1) because γ0 > −1/2.
For term II0b , Proposition B.1 entails
∂2`
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s))
∂x∂θ
(4.22)
≤ C max((− log s)γ0 −ε , (− log s)1+γ0 +ε , (− log s)2γ0 −ε , (− log s)1+2γ0 +ε )
≤ C max(s−ε , (1 − s)γ0 −ε , (1 − s)2γ0 −ε ).
(4.23)
Combined with (4.18) we get
∂2`
Bk (s)
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s))
s(− log s)γ0 +1 ∂x∂θ
= max(s−1/2−2ε , (1 − s)−1/2−2ε , (1 − s)γ0 −1/2−2ε )OP (1),
which implies, since γ0 > −1/2,
II0b
Z
=
0
1
∂2`
Bk (s)
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s))
ds + oP (1)
∂x∂θ
s(− log s)γ0 +1
where the integral on [0, 1] is well defined.
Similarly for II0c , (4.19) together with (4.23) yields
2
1
∂ `
Hγ0 ,ρ
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s))
− log s ∂x∂θ
≤ C max s−2ε , (1 − s)−2ε , (1 − s)2γ0 −2ε .
Because 2γ0 > −1, we get
Z 1 2
∂ `
1
0
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Hρ
IIc = λ
ds + o(1)
− log s
0 ∂x∂θ
where the integral on [0, 1] is well defined.
For II0d we use the uniform bound (4.10) and the upper bound (4.23) to get
II0d
k−1
k
∂2`
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Rk,m (s)ds
1
∂x∂θ
k
Z k−1
k
= oP (1)
C max s−1/2−2ε , (1 − s)−1/2−ρ−2ε , (1 − s)γ0 −1/2−ρ−2ε ds
Z
=
1
k
= oP (1).
20
We consider finally the last term II0e . With the notations x0n = (1 − u)Qγ0 (s) +
uQk,m (s) and z = z(θ0 , x0n ), Proposition B.1 yields
∂3`
θ0 , x0n ≤ C max z 2γ0 −ε , z 1+2γ0 +ε , z 3γ0 −ε , z 1+3γ0 +ε .
2
∂ x∂θ
Using the fact that z(θ0 , x0n ) is between z(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) and z(θ0 , Qk,m (s)), Corollary
B.1 implies z(θ0 , x0n ) = eOP (1) (− log s) so that
∂3`
0
−ε
2γ0 −ε
3γ0 −ε
θ
,
x
=
O
(1)
max
s
,
(1
−
s)
,
(1
−
s)
.
0
P
n
∂ 2 x∂θ
Combining this bound with (4.20), we obtain similarly as before
II0e
= O
1
√
k
k−1
k
Z
1
k
max s−1−3ε , (1 − s)−1+γ0 −3ε ds = oP (1).
Collecting all the different terms, we get
e k,m
∂L
(0) =
∂h
1
∂2`
Bk (s)
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s))
ds
s(− log s)γ0 +1
0 ∂x∂θ
Z 1 2
∂ `
1
+λ
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Hρ
ds + oP (1).
− log s
0 ∂x∂θ
Z
The second term in the right-hand side is deterministic and corresponds to λb with
b defined by (2.19). The first term is an integral of the Brownian bridge that
defines a centered Gaussian vector whose covariance only depends on the first order
parameter γ0 . Comparing with the special case of i.i.d. GEV random variables
considered in Corollary 4.1, we identify the covariance which is equal to Iγ0 . This
proves Equation (4.21) and concludes the proof of Theorem 2.1.
Proof of Theorem 2.2. The proof of Theorem 2.2 relies on Theorem 2.1 and on the
Argmax Theorem. Consider the random processes
e k,m (h) − L
e k,m (0),
Mn (h) = L
h ∈ R3
and
1
M (h) = hT (λb + G) − hT Iθ0 h, h ∈ R3
2
with G a centered Gaussian random vector with variance Iθ0 . Let Hn be the closed
ball of R3 centered at 0 and with radius rn → ∞ such that rn = O(k δ ) as in (2.13).
Define the maximizer
b
hn = argmax Mn (h).
h∈Hn
In the case it is not unique, define b
hn as the smallest maximizer in the lexicographic
order. Theorem 2.1 implies that, for any compact K ⊂ R3 , Mn converge in distribution to M in `∞ (K) as k → ∞. The limit process M is continuous and has a
unique maximizer given by
b
h = argmax M (h) = Iθ−1
(λb + G).
0
h∈R3
21
The Argmax Theorem (see van der Vaart [18] Corollary 5.58) implies that, provided
the sequence b
hn is tight, then b
hn converge weakly to b
h as n → ∞.
We now prove the tightness of the sequence b
hn . Let ε > 0. There is R > 0 such
that
P(kb
hk < R) > 1 − ε.
The relation
1
M (h) = M (b
h) − (h − b
h)T Iθ0 (h − b
h),
2
implies that
1
max M (h) = M (b
h) − λmin
2
kb
h−hk≥1
with λmin > 0 the smallest eigenvalue of Iθ0 . As a consequence, kb
hk < R implies
1
M (b
h) − max M (h) = max M (h) − max M (h) ≥ λmin
2
khk=R+1
khk≤R
khk=R+1
and this occurs with probability at least 1−ε. Using the convergence in distribution
of Mn to M in `∞ (K) with K = {h : khk ≤ R + 1}, we deduce that for large n
1
max Mn (h) − max Mn (h) ≥ λmin
4
khk=R+1
khk≤R
(4.24)
with probability at least 1 − 2ε. For large n, Hn contains the ball {h : khk ≤ R + 1}
(because rn → ∞) and, according to Proposition 2.1, Mn is strictly concave on
Hn with probability at least 1 − ε. Then, Equation (4.24) together with the strict
concavity of Mn implies that the maximizer b
hn of Mn over Hn satisfies kb
hn k ≤ R.
b
Hence, for large n, P(khn k ≤ R) ≥ 1 − 3ε and this proves the tightness of b
hn . Note
also that on this event, b
hn belongs to the interior of Hn and is hence a critical point
of Mn , i.e.
e k,m
∂L
∂Mk b
(hn ) = 0 or equivalently
(b
hn ) = 0.
∂h
∂h
Define
θbn = (γ0 + k −1/2b
hn,1 , bm + am k −1/2b
hn,2 , am (1 + k −1/2b
hn,3 )).
Equations (2.10) and (2.11) imply that
e k,m
∂L
∂Lk,m b
(b
hn ) = k −1/2
(θn ).
∂h
∂θ
∂Lk,m b
Hence, with high probability, Lk,m has a local maximum at θbn with ∂θ
(θn ) = 0,
b
i.e. θn is a MLE and Eq. (2.20) is satisfied. Eq. (2.21) stating the asymptotic
normality of θbk is a direct consequence of
e k,m (b
L
hn ) = Lk,m (θbn ) and
d
b
hn → b
h = Iθ−1
(λb + G) ∼ N (λIθ−1
b, Iθ−1
).
0
0
0
The second part of Theorem 2.2, i.e. the asymptotic uniqueness of the MLE, is a
consequence of the strict concavity stated in Proposition 2.1: with large probability
the log-likelihood function is strictly concave on Hn and hence the score equation
∂ e
∂h Lk,m (h) = 0 has a unique solution on Hn . For n large, the normalised MLE
b
hin = (b
γni , (b
µin − bm )/am , σ
bni /am − 1),
i = 1, 2
∂ e
belong to Hn with large probability and solve ∂h
Lk,m (h) = 0. This implies that
1
2
1
2
b
b
b
b
hn = hn with high probability and hence θn = θn with high probability.
22
A
Formulas for the information matrix and bias
According to Prescott and Walden [15] (see also Beirlant et al. [2, page 169]), the
information matrix of the GEV model at point θ0 = (γ0 , 0, 1) is given by
1
2
γ0
Iθ0 =
2
+ 1 − γ∗ + γ1
− γ2q +
0
0
− γ1 q − γp
0
0
− γ12 1 − γ∗ − q + 1−r+p
γ
π2
6
p
2
γ0
0
q−
p
γ0
− γ12
1 − γ∗ − q +
0
1−r+p
γ0
− p−r
γ
p
0
− p−r
γ
0
0
− γ1
0
1
2 (1
γ0
− 2r + p)
where Γ is Euler’s Gamma function, γ∗ = 0.5772157 is Euler’s constant and
p = (1 + γ0 )2 Γ(1 + 2γ0 ),
q = (1 + γ0 )Γ0 (1 + γ0 ) +
1
Γ(2 + γ0 ),
1+
γ0
r = Γ(2 + γ0 ).
The bias in Theorem 2.2 is given by Iθ−1 b where the vector b can be computed
exactly. Calculations are tedious and have been performed with Mathematicar .
We get b = (bγ , bµ , bσ ) with
1
Z
bγ
=
0
=
∂2`
1
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Hγ0 ,ρ
ds
∂x∂γ
− log s
1
2
2
3 ρ(γ +ρ) (γ0 + ρ)(1 + γ0 − γ∗ γ0 ) − (γ0 + γ0 (1 + ρ) + 2ρ(1 + γ0 ))Γ(1 + γ0 ) + (1 + γ0 ) ρΓ(1 + 2γ0 )
γ0
0
+γ02 Γ(1 − ρ) − γ0 (1 + γ0 )Γ(2 − ρ) + γ0 (1 + γ0 )(1 − ρ)Γ(1 + γ0 − ρ) − γ0 ρΓ0 (2 + γ0 ) − γ02 Γ0 (2 − ρ) ,
1
(1 + γ0 − γ0 γ∗ )2 + γ02 π 2 /6 + (1 + γ0 )2 Γ(1 + 2γ0 ) − 2(1 + γ0 ) [(1 + γ0 )Γ(1 + γ0 ) + γ0 Γ0 (1 + γ0 )] ,
γ4
0
1
Z
bµ
=
0
=
1
Z
bσ
=
0
=
B
∂2`
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Hγ0 ,ρ
∂x∂µ
1
− log s
ds
1+γ0
(−(γ0 + ρ)Γ(1 + γ0 ) + (1 + γ0 )ρΓ(1 + 2γ0 ) +
γ0 ρ(γ0
+ρ)
(1+γ)
(1
+
γ0 )Γ(1 + 2γ0 ) − Γ(2 + γ0 ) − γ0 Γ0 (1 + γ0 ) ,
2
γ0
γ0 (1 − ρ)Γ(1 + γ0 − ρ)) ,
ρ < 0,
ρ = 0,
∂2`
1
(θ0 , Qγ0 (s)) Hγ0 ,ρ
ds
∂x∂σ
− log s
1
− γ0 − ρ + (1 + γ0 )(γ0 + 2ρ)Γ(1 + γ0 ) − (1 + γ0 )2 ρΓ(1 + 2γ0 )
2 ρ(γ +ρ)
γ0
0
+γ0 Γ(2 − ρ) − γ0 (1 + γ0 )(1 − ρ)Γ(1 + γ0 − ρ) ,
1
− 1 + γ0 (γ∗ − 1) − (1 + γ0 )2 Γ(1 + 2γ0 ) + Γ(3 + γ0 ) + γ0 (1 + γ0 )Γ0 (1 + γ0 ) ,
γ3
ρ < 0,
ρ = 0.
0
Bounds for the derivatives of the likelihood
We provide in this section upper bounds for the partial derivatives of the GEV
log-likelihood,
1
x−µ
x − µ −1/γ
`(θ, x) = − 1 +
log 1 + γ
− 1+γ
− log σ,
γ
σ
σ
for θ = (γ, µ, σ) and x such that 1 + γ x−µ
σ > 0.
23
ρ < 0,
ρ = 0,
Proposition B.1. Let θ0 = (γ0 , 0, 1) with γ0 ∈ R. For all ε > 0, there exists a
neighbourhood N0 of θ0 and a constant C > 0 such that, for all θ ∈ N0 and x such
that 1 + γ(x − µ)/σ > 0, we have
∂`
∂xi ∂θ1−i
∂2`
∂xi ∂θ2−i
∂3`
∂xi ∂θ3−i
where
≤ C max z iγ0 −ε , z 1+iγ0 +ε , z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε ,
i = 0, 1,
≤ C max z iγ0 −ε , z 1+iγ0 +ε , z 2γ0 −ε , z 1+2γ0 +ε ,
i = 0, 1, 2,
≤ C max z iγ0 −ε , z 1+iγ0 +ε , z 3γ0 −ε , z 1+3γ0 +ε ,
i = 0, 1, 2, 3,
x − µ −1/γ
z = z(θ, x) = 1 + γ
> 0,
σ
for 1 + γ
x−µ
> 0.
σ
The notation ∂θ denotes either ∂γ, ∂σ or ∂µ and, similarly for higher order derivatives, ∂θ2 denotes ∂γ 2 , ∂γ∂µ, ∂γ∂σ, ∂µ2 . . .
Note that the constant C > 0 appearing in Proposition B.1 and in the proofs
below may change from line to line. Proposition B.1 gathers with short notations
several different inequalities. For instance, the first inequality with i = 1 yields
∂`
≤ C max z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε ,
∂x
while the third inequality with i = 1 yields
∂3`
≤ C max z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε , z 3γ0 −ε , z 1+3γ0 +ε
∂x∂γ∂σ
C max z γ0 −ε , z 1+3γ0 +ε if γ0 ≥ 0
≤
C max z 3γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε if γ0 ≤ 0.
For θ = (γ, µ, σ), we have
x−µ
`(θ, x) = g γ,
− log σ,
σ
1
g(γ, x) = − 1 +
log(1 + γx) − (1 + γx)−1/γ
γ
(B.1)
where the function g is the log-likelihood of the one parameter GEV distribution
with γ ∈ R (i.e. µ = 0 and σ = 1). With the notation
z(γ, x) = (1 + γx)−1/γ ,
1 + γx > 0
(B.2)
g(γ, x) = (1 + γ) log z(γ, x) − z(γ, x).
(B.3)
we have,
The proof of Proposition B.1 relies on three lemmas providing upper bounds for
the derivatives of z(γ, x) and g(γ, x). Define h : R → R by
x
(e − 1 − x)/x2 for x 6= 0
h(x) =
(B.4)
1/2
for x = 0
and denote by h(n) (x) its derivative of order n = 0, 1, 2.
24
Lemma B.1. The function h : R → R in (B.4) is twice continuously differentiable
and h(n) (x) = O(max(1, ex )) for all x ∈ R, and n = 0, 1, 2.
Proof
of Lemma B.1. The function h can be represented as the power series h(x) =
P
n
n≥0 x /(n + 2)! and is hence indefinitely continuously differentiable. From the
asymptotic behaviour
h(x) ∼ −
1
as x → −∞ ,
x
h(x) ∼
ex
as x → +∞,
x2
we deduce that the function x 7→ |h(x)|/ max(1, ex ) is bounded on R since it is
continuous with vanishing limits at ±∞. This proves the existence of C > 0 such
that |h(x)| ≤ C max(1, ex ) for all x ∈ R. The upper bound for the second and third
derivatives is proved similarly since simple computations show that
h0 (x) ∼
ex
as x → +∞
x2
1
as x → −∞ ,
x2
h0 (x) ∼
2
as x → −∞ ,
x3
h00 (x) ∼
and
h00 (x) ∼ −
ex
as x → +∞.
x2
From Lemma B.1 it follows
h(n) (γ log z) = O (max(1, z γ ) ,
n = 0, 1, 2.
(B.5)
We also use throughout the elementary bound | log z|k = O z ±δ , for all k ∈ N and
δ > 0.
Lemma B.2. Consider the function z(γ, x) defined by Equation (B.2). For all
γ0 ∈ R and ε > 0, there exists C > 0 and δ > 0 such that, for all γ ∈ (γ0 − δ, γ0 + δ)
and 1 + γx > 0,
∂z
∂xi ∂γ 1−i
∂2z
∂xi ∂γ 2−i
∂3z
∂xi ∂γ 3−i
≤ C max z 1+iγ0 ±ε , z 1+γ0 ±ε ,
≤ C max z 1+iγ0 ±ε , z 1+2γ0 ±ε ,
≤ C max z 1+iγ0 ±ε , z 1+3γ0 ±ε
i = 0, 1,
i = 0, 1, 2,
i = 0, 1, 2, 3,
Proof of Lemma B.2. Recall the definition (B.4) of the function h. The first order
partial derivatives of z equal
∂z
= −z 1+γ
∂x
and
∂z
= z(log z)2 h(γ log z).
∂γ
Assuming γ ∈ (γ0 − δ, γ0 + δ), we deduce
∂z
∂z
≤ C max(z 1+γ0 ±δ ) and
≤ C max(z 1±δ , z 1+γ0 ±2δ )
∂x
∂γ
25
(B.6)
from which the bounds of the first order partial derivatives of z follow. The second
order partial derivatives of z are given by
∂2z
∂x2
∂2z
∂x∂γ
∂2z
∂γ 2
∂z
∂x
∂z
= −(1 + γ)z γ
− (log z)z 1+γ
∂γ
∂z
= (log z + 2)(log z)h(γ log z) + γ(log z)2 h0 (γ log z)
+ z(log z)3 h0 (γ log z).
∂γ
= −(1 + γ)z γ
Combined with the previous bounds and (B.5), we obtain, for γ ∈ (γ0 − δ, γ0 + δ),
∂2z
∂x2
∂2z
∂γ∂x
∂2z
∂γ 2
≤ C max(z 1+2γ0 ±2δ )
≤ C max(z 1+γ0 ±2δ , z 1+2γ0 ±2δ )
≤ C max(z 1±2δ , z 1+2γ0 ±4δ )
from which the bounds for the second order partial derivatives of z follow. The case
of third order derivatives can be dealt with similarly and we omit the details.
Lemma B.3. Consider the function g(γ, x) defined by Equation (B.3). For all
γ0 ∈ R and ε > 0, there exists C > 0 and δ > 0 such that, for all γ ∈ (γ0 − δ, γ0 + δ)
and 1 + γx > 0,
∂g
∂xi ∂γ 1−i
∂2g
∂xi ∂γ 2−i
∂3g
∂xi ∂γ 3−i
≤ C max z iγ0 −ε , z 1+iγ0 +ε , z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε ,
i = 0, 1,
≤ C max z iγ0 −ε , z 1+iγ0 +ε , z 2γ0 −ε , z 1+2γ0 +ε ,
i = 0, 1, 2,
≤ C max z iγ0 −ε , z 1+iγ0 +ε , z 3γ0 −ε , z 1+3γ0 +ε ,
i = 0, 1, 2, 3.
Proof of Lemma B.3. Equation (B.3) expressing g(γ, x) in terms of z(γ, x) entails
∂g
1+γ
∂z
∂g
1+γ
∂z
=
−1
,
=
−1
+ log z.
∂x
z
∂x
∂γ
z
∂γ
Using the upper bound for the first derivatives of z(γ, x) in Lemma B.2, we get, for
γ ∈ (γ0 − δ, γ0 + δ),
∂g
≤ C max(z γ0 ±ε , z 1+γ0 ±ε ) ,
∂x
∂g
≤ C max(z ±ε , z 1±ε , z γ0 ±ε , z 1+γ0 ±ε ).
∂γ
This proves the upper bounds for the first derivatives of g(γ, x) given in Lemma B.3.
Note that we can handle the ± sign since we have −ε < ε < 1 − ε < 1 + ε, for small
ε > 0. When considering the maximum of the power functions, only the extreme
exponents −ε < 1 + ε matter. A similar argument holds for γ0 − ε < γ0 + ε <
1 + γ0 − ε < 1 + γ0 + ε.
26
Similarly for the second order derivatives of g(γ, x), the upper bounds are derived
from the similar upper bounds for the partial derivatives of z(γ, x) in Lemma B.2
(with ε replaced by ε/2) together with the formulas
∂2g
∂x2
∂2g
∂x∂γ
∂2g
∂γ 2
2
1+γ
∂ z
1 + γ ∂z 2
−1
−
z
∂x2
z2
∂x
2
1+γ
∂ z
1 ∂z
1 + γ ∂z ∂z
=
−1
+
−
z
∂x∂γ z ∂x
z 2 ∂x ∂γ
2
1+γ
2 ∂z
∂ z
1 + γ ∂z 2
=
+
.
−1
−
z
∂γ 2 z ∂γ
z2
∂γ
=
Partial derivatives of order 3 are dealt with similarly.
Proof of Proposition B.1. Equation (B.1) implies that the partial derivatives of `
are closely related to those of g. For the first derivatives, we have
∂`
x−µ
x−µ
1 ∂g
∂`
1 ∂g
γ,
γ,
(θ, x) =
(θ, x) = −
∂x
σ ∂x
σ
∂µ
σ ∂x
σ
∂`
∂g
x−µ
∂`
x − µ ∂g
x−µ
1
(θ, x) =
γ,
(θ, x) = − 2
γ,
− .
∂γ
∂γ
σ
∂σ
σ ∂x
σ
σ
These equalities together with Lemma B.3 yield
1 ∂g
∂`
=
≤ C max z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε ,
∂x
σ ∂x
which corresponds to the first inequality in Proposition B.1 with i = 0. We also
obtain
∂`
∂g
=
≤ C max z −ε , z 1+ε , z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε
∂γ
∂γ
,
∂`
1 ∂g
=
≤ C max z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε
∂µ
σ ∂x
which implies the inequality in Proposition B.1 with i = 1 and the derivatives taken
with respect to γ and µ respectively. The case of the derivative with respect to σ is
slightly more difficult: we use the inequality
x−µ
z −γ − 1
=
≤ C max(z −γ0 −δ , z −γ0 +δ , 1),
σ
γ
γ ∈ (γ0 − δ, γ0 + δ),
which implies
∂`
∂σ
=
1 z −γ − 1 ∂g
+ 1 ≤ C max(z −γ0 −δ , z −γ0 +δ , 1) max z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε
σ
γ
∂x
0
0
0
0
≤ C max(z −ε , z 1+ε , z γ0 −ε , z 1+γ0 +ε )
for sufficiently small ε0 . For the first inequality, we use Lemma B.3. This proves the
first inequality in Proposition B.1 with i = 1 and the derivatives taken with respect
to σ.
The case of second order derivatives is dealt similarly with the relations
27
∂2`
∂x2
∂2`
∂γ∂x
∂2`
∂µ∂x
∂2`
∂σ∂x
∂2`
∂γ 2
=
=
=
=
=
1 ∂2g
σ 2 ∂x2
1 ∂2g
σ ∂γ∂x
1 ∂2g
− 2 2
σ ∂x
x − µ ∂2g
− 3
σ ∂x2
2
∂ g
∂γ 2
∂2`
∂µ2
∂2`
∂σ 2
∂2`
∂γ∂µ
∂2`
∂γ∂σ
∂2`
∂µ∂σ
=
=
=
=
=
1 ∂2g
σ 2 ∂x2
x − µ ∂g
(x − µ)2 ∂ 2 g
1
2 3
+
+ 2
4
2
σ ∂x
σ
∂x
σ
1 ∂2g
−
σ ∂γ∂x
x − µ ∂2g
− 2
σ ∂γ∂x
1 ∂g
x − µ ∂2g
+
.
σ 2 ∂x
σ 3 ∂x2
Using these relations, the second inequality in Proposition B.1 follows from
Lemma B.3. Checking all the different cases is relatively tedious but elementary.
Details are omitted. Similar formulas hold for derivatives of order 3 and the resulting
bounds have been checked with Mathematicar .
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Laurens de Haan for his useful suggestions and
support.
Research partially funded by VolkswagenStiftung Support for Europe – WEXMOP and, FCT - Fundacão para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal, through
UID/MAT/00006/2013 and UID/Multi/04621/2013.
References
[1] A.A. Balkema and L. de Haan. Residual life time at great age. Ann. Probability,
2:792–804, 1974.
[2] J. Beirlant, Y. Goegebeur, J. Teugels, and J. Segers. Statistics of extremes:
Theory and applications. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley
& Sons Ltd., Chichester, 2004.
[3] A. Bücher and J. Segers. Maximum likelihood estimation for the frÃľchet
distribution based on block maxima extracted from a time series. Preprint
arXiv:1511.07613.
[4] A. Bücher and J. Segers. On the maximum likelihood estimator for the generalized extreme-value distribution. Preprint arXiv:1601.05702.
[5] S. Coles. An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. SpringerVerlag, London, 2001.
[6] L. de Haan and A. Ferreira. Extreme value theory: An introduction. Springer
Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer, New York,
2006.
[7] C. Dombry. Existence and consistency of the maximum likelihood estimators
for the extreme value index within the block maxima framework. Bernoulli,
21(1):420–436, 2015.
28
[8] H. Drees, L. de Haan, and D. de Li. On large deviation for extremes. Stat.
Probab. Letters, 1(64):51–62, 2003.
[9] P. Embrechts, C. Klüppelberg, and T. Mikosch. Modelling extremal events,
volume 33 of Applications of Mathematics (New York). Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
1997.
[10] A. Ferreira and L. de Haan. On the block maxima method in extreme value
theory: PWM estimators. Ann. Statist., 43(1):276–298, 2015.
[11] E.J. Gumbel. Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, New York,
1958.
[12] J.R.M. Hosking and J.R. Wallis. Parameter and quantile estimation for the
generalized Pareto distribution. Technometrics, 29(3):339–349, 1987.
[13] J.R.M. Hosking, J.R. Wallis, and E.F. Wood. Estimation of the generalized
extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments.
Technometrics, 27(3):251–261, 1985.
[14] J. Pickands, III. Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Ann.
Statist., 3:119–131, 1975.
[15] P. Prescott and A.T. Walden. Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the generalized extreme-value distribution. Biometrika, 67(3):723–724,
1980.
[16] G.R. Shorack and J.A. Wellner. Empirical processes with applications to statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and
Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1986.
[17] R.L. Smith. Maximum likelihood estimation in a class of nonregular cases.
Biometrika, 72(1):67–90, 1985.
[18] A.W. van der Vaart. Asymptotic statistics, volume 3 of Cambridge Series in
Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
29
| 10math.ST
|
Cybernetic Interpretation of the
Riemann Zeta Function
arXiv:1602.05507v1 [cs.SY] 12 Feb 2016
Petr Klán, Dept. of System Analysis, University of Economics in Prague, Czech Republic,
[email protected]
Abstract: This paper uses cybernetic approach to study behavior of the Riemann zeta
function. It is based on the elementary cybernetic concepts like feedback, transfer functions,
time delays, PI (Proportional–Integral) controllers or FOPDT (First Order Plus Dead Time)
models, respectively. An unusual dynamic interpretation of the Riemann zeta function is
obtained.
Key words: Riemann zeta function, feedback, time delay, PI controller, FOPDT model
1
Introduction
Zeta function [4] is associated with equation
∞
Y
X
1
1
=
s
n
1 − p−s
p=2,3,5...
n=1
(1)
introducing the fundamental relationship between natural numbers n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 . . . and
prime numbers p = 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 . . . for real s > 1. It was discovered by L. Euler in 1737. A
full idea of this relationship excels at expansion to the individual base elements
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
+
+
+
+
+
.
.
.
=
...,
1s 2s 3s 4s 5s
1 − 2−s 1 − 3−s 1 − 5−s 1 − 7−s 1 − 11−s
in which an infinite summation over all the natural numbers (left side) and an infinite product over all the prime numbers (right side) are contained. L. Euler assumed the parameter s
on both sides as a real number. Equation (1) is considered to be an input to the mystery of
interrelation between natural and prime numbers that is waiting for hundreds of years to be
discovered [2].
P
The infinite sum
1/ns from (1), typically for s > 1, is called zeta function ζ(s), thus
∞
X
1
.
ζ(s) =
s
n
n=1
(2)
Function diverges for s < 1 and converges for s > 1. For s = 1, the function ζ(s) is projected
to a harmonic series, which is divergent as well [5].
G. F. Riemann proposes a specific analytic function in the field of all complex numbers
s = a + ib in his work On the Number of Prime Numbers Under a Given Magnitude ([4],
Riemann’s original work is a part of this publication) that coincides with zeta function for
Re(s) > 1. This new function is called the Riemann zeta function and denoted in the same
way as zeta function (2). Whilst coincident with (2) introduced by L. Euler for values of a > 1
and b = 0, it is more formally considered for values of a < 1. The Riemann zeta function
1
stays in the effect throughout the interval of s, including a < 1. In considering language of
the complex analysis, the Riemann zeta function represents a meromorphic function in whole
complex plane except point s = 1, where it has no final value [8]1 . It greatly contributes to
the analysis of prime numbers distribution [2, 4, 9].
Riemann zeta function ζ(s) has two sorts of zero values2 or values s for which ζ(s) = 0. Some
of them, for example s = 0.5 + i14.135, s = 0.5 + i21.022, s = 0.5 + i25.011, s = 0.5 + i30.425,
s = 0.5 + i32.935 . . . are called nontrivial. One can ask, where do all the complex zero values
of the Riemann zeta function locate. As extremely interesting, it is taken the area of complex
plane determined by interval 0 ≤ a ≤ 1 for any real b which is called critical strip, see Fig.
1. The Riemann zeta function has zero values in negative integers ζ(−2) = 0, ζ(−4) = 0,
ζ(−6) = 0 . . . as well. They are called trivial. The Riemann hypothesis conjectures that
all the critical strip nontrivial zeros lie on midst critical line of 1/2. In other words, all the
zero values of the Riemann zeta function (except trivial) are assumed to receive values of
s = 0.5 + ib or 1/2 + ib for real b. When finding a single zero value in the critical strip outside
this midst line, Riemann hypothesis fails. The hypothesis has not been proven yet. Due to
its fundamental significance, it belongs to the millennium problems [2].
30
40.9
37.6
32.9
30.4
20
25.0
21.0
40
14.1
10
0
−10
−20
−30
−40
Critical line
1/2
1
−14.1
−21.0
−25.0
−30.4
−32.9
−37.6
−40.9
Critical strip
Figure 1: Critical strip of complex plane showing positions of nontrivial zero values.
The paper shows that for a > 1, the Riemann zeta function can be interpreted by an endless
serial connection of the elementary cybernetic concepts like PI controllers or FOPDT models
[6]. It is shown that this interpretation brings a new perspective to the Riemann zeta function
with possible impacts to the Riemann hypothesis.
1
2
This article provides an elegant proof of equation (1) for Re(s) > 1.
Terms like zeros and poles of transfer functions are well known in cybernetics too [6].
2
2
Single transfer functions
The right–hand side of equation (1) is composed of an infinite product of base elements
1
,
1 − p−s
(3)
1
.
1 − e−s ln p
(4)
where p is a prime and s a complex number. Cybernetic considerations frequently use the
base of natural logarithm e unlike primes p in the number theory. Thus, rewrite the base
element (3) equivalently to
If ex = p−s for a certain x, then x = −s ln p. Now, the infinite product (2) becomes
Y
p
1
1
1
1
1
1
=
...
−s
ln
p
−s
ln
2
−s
ln
3
−s
ln
5
−s
ln
7
1−e
1−e
1−e
1−e
1−e
1 − e−s ln 11
(5)
In Laplace transformation [3], the expression e−s ln p represents a transfer function including
time delay ln p. Generally, G(s) = e−sL , where L = ln p [6]. Looking through the eyes of
transfer functions, a block scheme including positive feedback for the entire expression (4)
is in Fig. 2. Here, R(s) is Laplace transformation of a reference input and Y (s) is Laplace
transformation of the corresponding output. In that case Y (s)/R(s) = 1/(1 − e−s ln p ).
R(s) +
Y (s)
+
e−sL
Figure 2: Base element (4) represented by the transfer function.
Reference inputs are usually realized by a unit step 1(t). The latter is defined as 0 for times
t < 0 and 1 for t > 0, in Laplace transformation 1/s. Assume that r(t) = 1(t) is a unit step
and determine output response y(t) of transfer function (4) to a unit step where the signals
r(t) and y(t) are denoted by R(s) and Y (s) in the Laplace transformation.
Suppose time delay L = ln 2 related to the first prime number in the positive feedback
loop of Fig. 2. Corresponding transfer function is Y (s)/R(s) = 1/(1 − e−s ln 2 ). A reference
input unit step is immediately transferred to the output, or y(t) = 1 for t > 0. This output is
delayed in the feedback and after time delay L it is added to the reference input, or y(t) = 2
for t > L. It again is delayed by time L, added to reference input. It results in y(t) = 3 for
t > 2L etc. A whole response to unit step reference input (transient response) is in Fig. 3.
Due to the positive feedback, a regular multistep signal y(t) is obtained3 .
3
It agrees with [3] which introduces the same Laplace transformation for time functions shown in Fig. 3.
3
y
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 ln 2
3 ln 2
5 ln 2
7 ln 2
t
Figure 3: Step response associated with transfer function 1/(1 − e−s ln 2 ).
Transient response in Fig. 3 can not be simply described. Therefore, an approximation is
used in the sequel. The points placed just in the middle of time delays in Fig. 3 join a
line beginning at y(0) = 0.5. Some of these points and the corresponding values of transient
response are collected in Tab. 1.
t
y
ln 2/2 3 ln 2/2 5 ln 2/2 7 ln 2/2 . . .
1
2
3
4
...
Table 1: A collection of transient pairs associated with transfer function 1/(1 − e−s ln 2 ).
Considering pairs in Tab. 1 one can make the following interesting deduction: the approximated line transient response is described by
1
t
ln 2
which coincides with the transient response of a PI controller given by transfer function
y(t) = 0.5 +
1
1
+
(6)
2 sL
or 0.5 + 1/s ln 2, where L = ln 2 represents an integration time constant. Notice that the
line in Fig. 3 corresponds to (6) as well if the first–order Pade approximation is used in the
form e−s ln p = (1 − s ln p/2)/(1 + s ln p/2). After substituting the latter into 1/(1 − e−s ln p ) it
implies that 1/[1 − (1 − s ln p/2)/(1 + s ln p/2)] = 1/2 + 1/(s ln p).
4
Since an infinite product in the Riemann zeta function, it is concluded that the latter can be
approximated by an endless series combining transfer functions of PI controllers (6)
Y 1
1
(7)
+
2
s
ln
p
p
or
0.5 +
1
s ln 2
0.5 +
1
s ln 3
1
0.5 +
s ln 5
0.5 +
1
s ln 7
0.5 +
1
s ln 11
...
This approximation is called PI approximation or simple approximation of the Riemann zeta
function. Connection of something fundamental as the Riemann zeta function is in the theory
of numbers and something as PI controllers fundamental in cybernetics is really surprising
based on a big context difference of both these subjects.
3
Case ζ(ib)
By virtue of formulation (5) in which s = ib for non–negative real b and a = 0, we can form
ζ(ib) by
Y
p
1
.
1 − e−ib ln p
Based on (7), it results in a PI approximation
Y 1
1
ζPI (ib) =
+
2
ib ln p
p
(8)
composed of the frequency transfer functions.
4
Case ζ(a + ib)
Consider s = a + ib for non–negative real a, b. Thus, each base element of the zeta function
(4) equals
1
and by rearranging
1−
e−(a+ib) ln p
1−
e−aL e−ibL
1
,
(9)
in which L = ln p. Introducing K = e−aL as form of a gain, it composes a feedback loop with
positive feedback shown in Fig. 4. Analogously with Fig. 2, it relates to transfer function
Y (s)/R(s) = 1/(1 − Ke−sL ) for s = ib.
Consider again L = ln 2 for time delay in Fig. 4. If a reference unit step input occurs, then it
immediately is transferred to the output, i.e. y(t) = 1 for t > 0. In feedback, it is multiplied
by gain K, delayed by time L, and added to the reference input, i.e. y(t) = 1 + K for t > L.
It again is multiplied by K, delayed by time L, added to reference input, which products
5
R(s) +
Y (s)
+
K
e−sL
Figure 4: Base element (9) as a feedback loop, s = ib.
y(t) = 1 + K(1 + K) = 1 + K + K 2 for t > 2L, y(t) = 1 + K(1 + K(1 + K)) = 1 + K + K 2 + K 3
for t > 3L etc. It forms transient response which is shown in Fig. 5. Note that a specific
case of this response for K = 1 is in Fig. 3 . A complex step signal y(t) is generated by an
irregular height of individual steps. In Fig. 5, point 1 + K ∗ on vertical axis relates to 1 + K,
1 + 2K ∗ to 1 + K + K 2 , 1 + 3K ∗ to 1 + K + K + K 2 + K 3 etc.
y
1 + 7K ∗
1 + 6K ∗
1 + 5K ∗
1 + 4K ∗
1 + 3K ∗
1 + 2K ∗
1 + K∗
1
0 ln 2
3 ln 2
5 ln 2
7 ln 2
t
Figure 5: Transient response associated with transfer function 1/(1 − Ke−s ln 2 ).
Since K ≤ 1 and K > 0, summation 1+K +K 2 +. . .+K n constitutes geometric series having
partial sums 1 + K + K 2 + . . . + K n = (1 − K n+1 )/(1 − K) and the infinite sum 1/(1 − K). A
few single time points in Fig. 5 together with related values of transient response is collected
in Tab. 2.
Since a close relation between geometric series and exponential functions, the partial sum of
the geometric series can be written as
1
1
1 − K n+1 =
1 − e(n+1) ln K ,
1−K
1−K
6
(10)
n
y
1
1 − K2
1−K
2
1 − K3
1−K
3
1 − K4
1−K
4
1 − K5
1−K
...
...
Table 2: Values of transient response representing transfer function 1/(1 − Ke−s ln 2 ).
in which n ≥ 0 and n = 0 relates to t = 0, n = 1 to t = ln 2, n = 2 to 2 ln 2 etc. It expresses
transient response of the first order transfer function
Ke−sL
,
(11)
1 + Ts
where K is gain, T time constant and L time delay. This kind of transfer function is called
FOPDT model or three–parameter model [6, 7]. Gain of transfer function (11) is given by the
steady state of unit step response K = 1/(1 − K) − 1 owing to the initial condition y(0) = 1,
then
1+
K
.
1−K
Identification of the time constant T is based on pairs in Tab. 2 giving
K=
(12)
ln 2
.
(13)
1−K
It is based on scenario, in which the tangent line of transient response at beginning intersects
the point K indicated in Fig. 2. If the ratio of K/(1 − K) and time constant T determines
ẏ(0), then the latter is determined by the ratio K and ln 2 as well.
T =
This approximation suggests that L = 0 permanently for all time delays of FOPDT model
(10). A deeper analysis of transient responses for large prime numbers associated with big
delays L and small gains K shows that the shape of the response in Fig. 5 is relatively rare.
More often, responses are similar to single steps characterized by delay L and one magnitude
1 + K since the very small squares of K (10). This observation was independently confirmed
by a use of the three–parameter model calculus [7], which underlines the importance of the
time delay approximation in describing behavior of feedback loop in Fig. 4. Use of this
calculus also showed that the time constant (13) estimates rather give the average residence
time of FOPDT model Tar = T + L, see (11) than the time constants themselves. Thus, the
estimated time constant results in
T =
and the estimated time delay
ln 2 √
K
1−K
ln 2
L=
1−K
These estimates agree with observations. If K
is tiny. Conversely, the time delay rises up.
change in this case.
√
1− K .
(14)
(15)
is very small, then the estimated time constant
Response (10) looks almost like a single step
Therefore, one can conclude that the Riemann zeta function ζ(a + ib) is described by the
endless transfer function called FOPDT approximation or complex approximation in the form
!
Y
K p e−sLp
,
(16)
1+
1
+
T
s
p
p
7
where
Kp = e−a ln p = p−a ,
K p = Kp /(1 − Kp ),
Tp =
and
Lp =
ln p p
Kp
1 − Kp
p
ln p
1 − Kp
1 − Kp
or by the FOPDT frequency function (16)
ζFOPDT (a + ib) =
Y
p
Kp e
1 + ibTp
−ibLp
1+
!
.
(17)
Note for completeness, that for Pade approximation of (9) we obtain 1/[1−K(1−SL/2)/(1+
sL/2)] = (1 + sL/2)/[(1 − K) + (1 + K)sL/2], which eventually leads to transfer function
based on the single base elements
1 + s ln p/2
.
1 + Kp
ln p/2 s
1+
1 − Kp
This approximation indicates a different initial point for the transient response. Whilst
y(0) = 1 for (16), y(0) = 1/(1 + Kp ) at Pade approximation. If a = 0, then y(0) = 0.5
in accordance with (7). However, the Pade approximation is only applicable to the base
elements having small time delays.
1
1 − Kp
5
FOPDT approximation experiments
Some typical real values (b = 0) obtained by FOPDT approximation (16) are collected in
Tab. 3. Experiments were carried out with the first million of prime numbers [1].
a
2
3
4
5
6
ζ(a) Tabular value
1.6449
π 2 /6
1.2021
1.0823
π 4 /90
1.0369
1.0173
π 6 /945
a
7
8
9
10
12
ζ(a)
Tabular value
1.0083
1.0041
π 8 /9450
1.0020
1.0010
π 10 /93 555
1.0002 691π 12/638 512 875
Table 3: Some real values of the Riemann zeta function obtained through FOPDT approximation.
Results for complex values of s = 2 + bi obtained by FOPDT approximation (17) summarize
Tab. 4. Experiments were carried out with the first million primes as well. For comparison,
Tab. 4 refers to tabular values of ζ(2 + ib) on the first 4 decimal places.
The tables 3 and 4 show that real and complex values of the Riemann zeta function obtained
by FOPDT approximation (17) are rather accurate. In the case of complex values surprisingly
up to two decimal places since achieved by simple FOPDT model.
8
b
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
ζ(2 + ib)
1.6351 − 0.0928i
1.6067 − 0.1799i
1.5627 − 0.2567i
1.5075 − 0.3202i
1.4455 − 0.3692i
Tabular value
1.6350 − 0.0927i
1.6067 − 0.1798i
1.5628 − 0.2565i
1.5079 − 0.3198i
1.4463 − 0.3688i
b
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
ζ(2 + ib)
1.3807 − 0.4041i
1.3165 − 0.4262i
1.2552 − 0.4375i
1.1980 − 0.4399i
1.1459 − 0.4353i
Tabular value
1.3821 − 0.4037i
1.3187 − 0.4261i
1.2582 − 0.4378i
1.2018 − 0.4410i
1.1504 − 0.4375i
Table 4: Some complex values of the zeta function obtained through FOPDT approximation.
6
Conclusion
Based on the similarity of transient characteristics, two approximations of the Riemann zeta
function for a > 1, ζPI (see (8)) and ζFOPDT (see (17)), were obtained. Approximation of
the Riemann zeta function results in a dynamic model consisting of base elements including
positive feedbacks and delays, which are infinitely many times serially connected. It provides
rather accurate approximations owing to their simplicity.
The paper points to the possibility of using the methods of cybernetics for solving problems in number theory. Two cybernetic–like models were derived close to the Riemann zeta
function in terms of single transfer functions. Based on this paper it can be remarkably concluded, that such fundamental concepts of cybernetics as PI controllers or FOPDT models
stand in the modeling of the fundamental and complex function as the zeta function undoubtedly is. Can cybernetics be used e.g. in the density analysis of primes with respect to
the known role of the Riemann zeta function in this subject?
References
[1] Ch. Caldwell (1994–2012): The Prime Pages. Online primes.utm.edu.
[2] C.C. Clawson (1996): Mathematical Mysteries. The Beauty and Magic of Numbers. Basic
Books.
[3] G. Doetsch (1961): Anleitung zum Praktischen Gebrauch der Laplace–Transformation. R.
Oldenbourg, Műnchen.
[4] H.M. Edwards (2001): Riemann’s Zeta Function. Dover Publications.
[5] P. Klán (2014): Numbers. Relationships, Insights and Eternal Inspirations. Academia
Prague (in Czech).
[6] P. Klán, R. Gorez (2011): Process Control. FCC Public.
[7] P. Klán (2011): A Comprehensive Calculus of Three–Parameter Models. Automa No. 8-9,
70–73 (in Czech).
[8] M. Křı́žek, M. Markl, L. Somer (2013): In 2013, Pierre Deligne won the Abel Prize for fundamental work joining algebra and geometry. Pokroky matematiky, fyziky a astronomie,
Vol. 58, No. 4, 265–273 (in Czech).
[9] I. Stewart (2013): Visions of Infinity. Basic Books.
9
| 3cs.SY
|
Intent-Aware Contextual Recommendation System
Biswarup Bhattacharya∗ , Iftikhar Burhanuddin† , Abhilasha Sancheti‡ and Kushal Satya§
∗ Department
arXiv:1711.10558v1 [cs.IR] 28 Nov 2017
of Computer Science, USC Viterbi School of Engineering
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089. USA.
Email: [email protected]
† ‡ Adobe Research
† Email: [email protected]
‡ Email: [email protected]
§ Adobe
Email: [email protected]
Abstract—Recommender systems take inputs from user history, use an internal ranking algorithm to generate results and
possibly optimize this ranking based on feedback. However, often
the recommender system is unaware of the actual intent of the
user and simply provides recommendations dynamically without
properly understanding the thought process of the user. An
intelligent recommender system is not only useful for the user
but also for businesses which want to learn the tendencies of their
users. Finding out tendencies or intents of a user is a difficult
problem to solve.
Keeping this in mind, we sought out to create an intelligent
system which will keep track of the user’s activity on a webapplication as well as determine the intent of the user in each
session. We devised a way to encode the user’s activity through
the sessions. Then, we have represented the information seen
by the user in a high dimensional format which is reduced
to lower dimensions using tensor factorization techniques. The
aspect of intent awareness or intent scoring is dealt with at
this stage. Finally, combining the user activity data with the
contextual information gives the recommendation score. The
final recommendations are then ranked using some filtering
and collaborative recommendation techniques to show the top-k
recommendations to the user. A provision for feedback is also
envisioned in the current system which informs the model to
update the various weights involved in the recommender system
architecture. Our overall model aims to combine both frequencybased and context-based recommendation systems and quantify
the intent of a user to provide better recommendations.
We ran experiments on real-world timestamped user activity
data, in the setting of recommending reports to the users of a
business analytics tool/application and the results are better than
the baselines. We also tuned certain aspects of our model to arrive
at optimized results.
I. I NTRODUCTION
In the business world, showing the advertisement of the
“appropriate” product to the “appropriate” person at the correct
time is the most definite method of attracting customers. This
is the general underlying thought behind digital marketing
solutions which exist in the current ecosystem. Occasionally, it
may be easy to figure out what the user wants but generally it
isn’t that trivial. Therefore, there is a need for an effective
recommendation system which can identify what the user
wants to do and needs to do.
When we talk about what a user wants to do, there are
three questions involved. The first question is: Does the user
like what he is doing? This is probably a harder question
to answer but after analyzing in a web-based situation this
reduces to observing things like the frequency of visits, the
duration spent by the user on a page, the depth of each
visit and so on. Determining the answer to this question at
least for a customized scenario is an essential component
in improving the recommendations for a user so that the
user ultimately starts liking the material shown/suggested to
him and he starts spending more time on the webpage. The
sweet spot in any recommender system algorithm is to get
positive reinforcement which can lead to more revenue for
the businesses involved and greater satisfaction of the user.
Thus, it is a win-win situation for everyone involved. The
second question is: Does the user want to do what he did
the last time? For example, an electronic music listener would
like electronic music recommendations with high probability.
In such situations, we can extrapolate that we can get better
results if we suggest them electronic music soundtracks rather
than rock music. This leads us on to the third question: Does
the user want to do something new that he never did before?
This is a very difficult question to answer and much work
has been done on providing diversification in recommendation
systems to handle problems exactly like this [1]. If we can
identify what is going on in user’s mind then we can design
a “smart” system.
Coming on to the second part of what the user needs to do,
there are certain aspects involved. A user in a business setting
(for eg. an employee using a company’s product) generally
has an objective provided to him by the administration that he
needs to fulfill. Thus, understanding the function of the user
and his requirements is an essential component to designing
a suitable recommendation system. Speaking from a virtual
assistant perspective, if a user is in the sales department of a
company then he will want suggestions related to methods of
improving sales and may not be bothered about getting computer programming suggestions. However, the programming
suggestions may be useful to the technical team who primarily
do not have to bother about the sales issues. Thus, even though
as a company, both of these two suggestions may be of high
relevance to the overall group of “employees of the company”,
we see that our recommender system must understand what
©2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including
reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or
reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. DOI: 10.1109/ICDMW.2017.8
each user in that company needs to do to provide effective
recommendations.
A simple frequency-based recommender system essentially
remembers the pages visited in the previous sessions by the
user and suggests those pages itself. This is a simple algorithm
but has obvious issues like not taking into account the content
of the page.
An alternate system of recommendations which exists is
a content-based recommendation system. Lots of variations
exist in literature about this [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] however, the
basic idea remains the same i.e. the system essentially tries
to observe the usefulness of a piece of content (or webpage)
to a user and thus recommend it to a user. Usually, there
is some sort of relevance “score” involved which can range
from simple methods like cosine similarity to more complex
algorithms.
The novelty of our work lies in the focus on combining
these two aspects of recommender systems in the hope of
providing better recommendations. We propose an innovative
method of encapsulating the user intent so as to increase the
relevance of the recommendations shown. In complex systems,
there are a vast array of parameters which can be changed,
thus leading to thousands of possible recommendations which
can be suggested to the user. Overall, in this paper, we
suggest a methodology to rank the content and combine this
ranking with historical browsing knowledge to arrive at a
new recommendation score. We conduct experiments on real
data for recommending reports to users to demonstrate the
effectiveness of our approach.
II. R ELATED W ORK
Firstly, we have a content-based recommendation system
which recommends particular kinds of items to the users.
This consists of the recommendation system used by Netflix [7], traditional music recommendation systems [8] and
video recommendation by YouTube [9]. These kinds of recommendations are driven by the content of the items to
be recommended (i.e. description of the music, movie title,
genre etc.) and a profile of the user’s preference based on
the historical information. A way of combining the global
popularity and the user preference of videos to recommend
the next N videos recommendation on YouTube is described in
[9]. Various methodologies like use of latent factors to model
the relationship between items and users and to determine the
rating of videos by the neighboring videos seen by the user
are discussed in [7].
Other kinds of systems deal with a Markov-model approach.
This consists of models which study item similarity to understand sequential patterns and recommend next set of items
based on the previous set [10]. User’s preference for different
items can be modeled using a Markov chain. Therefore a
transition matrix is estimated that gives the probability of
buying an item based on the previous purchases of the user.
Tensor decomposition methods can be used to promote collaborative filtering by combining transition matrices of similar
users. However these models lack the knowledge of contextual
signals from the user. Then, we have context-based recommendation systems. These systems represent context(such as
time, place) either explicitly through various external signals
[11], [12] or implicitly using the technique of exploration and
exploitation [13]. Tensor decomposition methods can be extended to combine content, context and collaborative filtering
as in [11]. Bandit’s approach can be used to generate context
aware online recommendations. Instead of modeling context
explicitly through external signals, [13] uses user activity or
user feedback to model the context and hence gives the most
suitable recommendation in that context. These systems lack
sequential evolution of the state and they do not consider the
final intent of the user.
Finally, some literature exists on tracking user intent by
analyzing context. Contextual Markov chains [14] and nowcasting models [15] have been studied to track user intent
through the context. However context modeling in these cases
are limited to consumer applications. Context and intent in
enterprise applications have to be dealt with differently and
modeled in a way relevant for the enterprise users.
The motivation behind our work comes from the intent
tracking with sequential evolution as described in [11]. We
have redesigned the algorithm combined with other techniques
to suit our needs.
III. P ROBLEM D EFINITION
In this section, we formally define the problem we target to
solve in this paper.
There are certain special business intelligence tasks involved
which require the user to go through the content of multiple
reports to arrive at conclusions. Often, specialized business
intelligence tools are used for this purpose. Thus, the user
has an end goal in mind which is of prime importance to the
recommendation system. We refer to this goal as the intent
of the user which in our scenario is a report. This is a very
difficult task to solve given the current literature. Our system
aims to provide recommendations of this manner where the
system tries to understand the end goal of the user thereby
assisting the user in coming to conclusions faster. This also
helps in reducing human error as the system essentially tries
to understand the quality of the webpage content (which in
the normal case the user tries to utilize manually) and suggest
webpages (reports in our scenerio) accordingly.
Also, in our case, a new user of a tool may be overwhelmed
by the number of features provided by it. There is not much
history involved for a new user so recommendations are not
“correct” or appropriate most of the times. This user’s needs
have to be understood over a certain period of time. Thus,
in this case, a collaborative approach makes sense. There has
been some work done in case of expert recommendations in
literature [16]. Our system utilizes a collaborative/group-based
model to suggest recommendations in order to address this
issue.
In this paper, we aim to solve the following questions:
• Predict user intent which is the end goal or report in our
scenario, from context and frequency
Determine the relationships between various features in
the content of a webpage
• Determine the right content, data and representation based
on the type and expertise of the user
• Find the most suitable recommendation scoring system
We will propose a model that is able to address the above
questions. We will refer recommendation items as reports and
users as analysts in the paper, but the approach works with
any type of items with parse-able information (e.g. webpages,
products, movies, music etc.).
•
Fig. 1. Frequency Model using hit data (Section V-A)
IV. S YSTEM D ESIGN
In this section, we describe our approach in detail. We
first describe the graphical and contextual models that predict the relevance of items to users (Sections IV-A,B,C,D),
then we describe how we can incorporate these two models
together to generate the recommendations (Section IV-E,F).
Here, items refer to the reports seen by the users. Each report
is a dimension which gives the value of a metric for each
of the dimension elements. Metric is a continuous variable,
dimension is a categorical variable and dimension element is
a value that a dimension takes. For example, for a report “Page
Views” which consists of the page views of individual pages in
a website, the dimension elements can be {“homepage”, “sales
page”, “contacts page”} and so on and the metric for these
elements is “number of views”. Time-series reports capture
the variation of a metric over time for a particular dimension
element while histogram reports consist of histograms of
metrics over different dimension elements. Finally, we briefly
discuss about feedback in this scenario (Section IV-G).
We propose a solution to predicting user intent based upon
current context and combining it with a frequency based
graphical model to provide relevant recommendations to the
user. We have defined the current context as the current report
being looked at by the analyst. Our solution approach has 3
main steps:
1) Modeling browsing patterns through a user navigation
graph (Markov Model) where each node is uniquely
represented.
2) Modeling context of the user as a matrix of context
features versus time and predicting user intent from
latent factors which are obtained from current context.
3) Combining the Markov Model and the intent scores to
give relevant recommendations to the user.
A. User Navigation Graph
The first step of the algorithm is to generate a navigation
graph for each user. We need to learn the reports (webpages)
that each of the users visit so that we can build our set of
reports from which to recommend. We do this by encoding
additional information while building this graph of reports for
every user. This forms the frequency-based recommendation
aspect of our algorithm. The frequency model is illustrated in
Figure 1 and explained below.
A user navigation graph is a weighted directed graph with
each node signifying a unique report seen by the user and each
directed edge between node u and v signifying that the user
transitioned between node u and v with probability greater
than 0. This user graph can be thought of as a Markov model
since the outgoing transition probabilities for each node sums
up to 1.
B. Determining the Target nodes
The second step of the algorithm is to determine the
target/intent nodes. The motivation behind this is that every
user has some intent in his mind as was discussed before. The
target nodes are denoted by setting the target attribute of the
node to 1. Target nodes refer to the possible candidates for
intent which is the end of analysis or a milestone. The target
nodes were arrived by analyzing the sequences of nodes visited
by the user in a session and using the following heuristics. If
the node in question has in-degree greater than or equal the
mean of the in-degrees of all nodes, then the target attribute
is set to 1. This algorithm has yielded at least 1 target node
even in the smallest of graphs particularly due to the inherent
property of the statistical mean which ensures that at least 1
node will be set as a target.
C. Context Model
The next step of the algorithm is to model the user context.
This forms the basis of the context-based recommendations
as was discussed before. This combined with the frequency
information encoded in the user navigation graph will give
the final recommendation score. This combination is the novel
step which is behind the improvement in performance. Section
V-D gives the evidence of this improvement.
Fig. 2. Building the context tensor
There are mostly two kinds of reports seen by the users: one
is the report in the form of histograms and the another is in the
form of time series. To model context from the current report
(that the user is seeing), we extract some relevant features as
described below. This of course varies from domain to domain
based on implementation.
For each time-series report we extract the following 6
features [17]: aggregate value, maximum and minimum value
of the time series, location of maximum and minimum observation, longest positive and negative runs, length of time
series & average absolute change in consecutive observation.
These features are calculated for each metric and dimension
element pair. Alternatively, for each histogram report only the
aggregate value as a feature is populated and rest of the 5
values in the vector are set to 0. From all the reports seen by a
given user we form descriptions for building the context vector
in which we specify a place for six different values for all the
reports seen. So at each time instant, the corresponding vector
is populated according to the type of the report. By combining
context vectors at different time instants, the context matrix is
formed for all the users.
The users of the tool are analyzed and clustered into 4
categories depending on their exposure and competence level
of using the tool using k-means clustering algorithm. This
is done for the purpose of group-based recommendations
which is discussed in Section IV-F. The users are categorized
depending upon their usage and amount of activity on the
tool. Activity here implies duration of browsing, number of
redirects, reports seen.
After clustering, the user matrix is combined for users
within a cluster to form the context tensor. For a given user we
have a set of different dimension elements over which metric
is calculated. The cardinality of this
for each metric m is
PMset
u
denoted as dm . We define Du = m=1
dm where Mu is the
cardinality of the set of all metrics seen by the user. For each
report, we have 6 observable features. Thus the dimension of
the context vector is 6 × Du , which we denote as N u . We
populate all the 6 values for a time-series report and only the
aggregate value is populated for a histogram report. All the
remaining positions are given a value of zero indicating they
are not present in the current report. The aggregation of many
such context vectors over the number of reports seen form the
context matrix. The dimension of the context matrix is hence
N u ×T , where N u signifies the context variables which varies
from user to user and T signifies the number of reports seen.
We form the context tensor consisting of context matrices of
U users from the same cluster. The method to generate the
context tensor is illustrated in Figure 2.
For each user we repeat the reports seen, such that the total
number of reports seen is equal to the maximum number of
reports seen by any user. Since the tensor is highly sparse
and the number of context features varies from user to user,
PARAFAC2 tensor decomposition is used to obtain latent
factors for each report seen by the user [15], [18].
1) PARAFAC2 Decomposition: For a three-way tensor i.e.
N u × T × U , PARAFAC2 decomposition requires only two
out of the three modes (N u , T and U ) to have uniform
sizes, which in our scenario are the time (T ) and user modes
(U ), while the third mode N u can be of different sizes.
The decomposition is equivalent to solving the following
optimization problem:
(F̃, Λ̃u )u=1,2,...|U | = minu
F,Λ
|U |
X
||Xu − Λu F||2 F
(1)
u=1
where F is the Frobenius norm. The latent factor space
dimensionality is R × T . The value of T is discussed above.
The value of R is a constant fixed by us for design purposes.
It is typically a value much smaller than the number of users
(|U |), which leads to the reduction of the dimensionality of the
original context tensor (X). After decomposition, the panel for
the uth user is approximated by
Xu ≈ Gu HSu V0
u
N u ×R
(2)
R×R
where G ∈ R
is an orthonormal matrix, H ∈ R
is
a matrix invariant to u, Su ∈ RR×R is a diagonal matrix and
V ∈ RT ×R is the matrix containing the collaborative latent
factors at T time instances. The latent factors are a lower
dimensional representation of reports. For the uth user, the
initially estimated latent factors are
F̃u = F̃ = V0
(3)
and the factor loading matrix is estimated by
Λ̂u = Gu HSu
(4)
2) Kalman Filter: Kalman Filter is used to enforce the
dynamics and sequential correlations in the latent factors. Let
the a priori and a posteriori latent factors and error covariance
matrices at time step t be f̃t , f̂t , P̃ut and P̂ut , respectively. Au
represents the transition matrix. In the time update (prediction)
step, the a priori factors for the next time step are computed
by
f̃t = Au f̂t−1 + ω ut
(5)
and the priori error covariance by
0
P̃ut = Au P̃ut−1 Au + Qu
(6)
In the measurement update (correction) step, the Kalman gain
Kut equals
0
Kut = P̃ut Λu (Λu P̃ut Λu + Ψu )−1
(7)
where Ψ is the covariance matrix [15]. With the Kalman gain,
the a priori latent factors are corrected by available contextual
signals (missing signals are assigned a very large variance),
and the a posteriori factors equals
u
f̂t = f̃t + Kut (xt − Âf̃t )
(8)
The a posteriori error covariance for next time step equals
P̂ut = (I − Kut Λu )P̃ut
(9)
I is the identity matrix The value of R was iterated over
multiple values to arrive at optimal values so that latent factors
can be evolved faster [15].
D. Ranking of Latent Factors
To distinguish between the finally evolved latent factors
(using Kalman filtering) with and without intent I for each
user, the pair-wise learning-to-rank method of RankSVM [19]
was used.
Fig. 3. Context Model to get relevance scores
From the ranking function we wish to obtain the intent score
(S) such that scores are normalized to be between 0 and 1.
Here, w
~ · ~f represents the distance between the training point
and plane separating positive training and negative training
points. The latent factors are normalized to have norm 1.
Now since the RankSVM measures the distance between
the hyperplane and the set of points, the distance value lies
between −4 and 4 (since the difference of latent factors have
norm less than 2 after normalization).
For every test data, we calculate the latent factor (~f ) for the
report seen and take its dot product with the weights for each
intent which finally gives us the intent score (S) , normalized
to be between 0 and 1:
SI (~f ) =
(4 + w
~ I · ~f )
8
(12)
The method to get the relevance score through the context
model is illustrated in Figure 3.
E. Recommendation Scoring
Fig. 4. The recommendation system with feedback
Based on the training data we have the set R1 which
consists of all the latent factors fi such that the user eventually
ends up at target node I in the session. Similarly we have the
set R2 which consists of all the latent factors fj such that the
user does not eventually end up at target node I in the session
i.e. the user reaches a target node other than the intent I.
We define g(I, fi ) = 1 if fi belongs to the set R1 otherwise
g(I, fi ) = 0 if fi belongs to the set R2 . So, this notation
induces a partial ranking of latent factors for intent I such that
fi is preferred over fj for intent I. P is a set as defined below.
P = {(i, j) : fi ∈ R1 and fj ∈ R2 }
The objective of the RankSVM is to learn the ranking
function g(I, fi ) such that g(I, fi ) > g(I, fj ) for all fi ∈ R1
and fj ∈ R2 . Thus, g(I, fi ) can be defined as
g(I, fi ) =< w,
~ fi >
(10)
Following a large margin approach leads us to the optimization problem:
X
min < w,
~ w
~ > +λ
ij
(11)
w,
~ ij ≥0
ij
s.t. ∀(i, j) ∈ P, < w,
~ fi > ≥ < w,
~ fj > + 1 − ij , where
λ > 0 determines the trade-off between margin maximization
and error minimization. The latter is the sum of individual
losses ij and constitutes an upper bound on the 0/1-loss of
mistaken preference relations. The constraints enforce < w,
~
fi > is greater than < w,
~ fj > whenever possible and penalize
violations thereof. Once optimal w
~ has been learned they can
be used to induce ranking of new latent factors for each intent.
The next step of the algorithm is to determine the recommendation scores for the candidate recommendable nodes.
This is the step which puts together frequency-based and
context-based recommendations. According to our hypothesis,
our aim was to prove that combining both of these can actually
improve recommendations.
This step is responsible for finally combining the intent
scores, edge weights (Wuv ) and the masses (Mv ). The formula
that we are using for scoring recommendation (Kuv ) is as
follows:
Kuv = (αv × Wuv × Rv ) + (βv × Mv )
(13)
The components of the recommendation score are as follows:
• Wuv : This is the historical probability that the user goes
from current node, u to a recommendable node, v. This
probability information is stored in the graph itself as the
edge weight.
• Rv : This is the relevance score of the recommendable
node, v. This score is essentially a function of the intent
scores and the probabilistic distance from the node v to
the set of target (intent) nodes (the function definitions
Max-IxD and Dot-IxD are discussed in Section V-D).
Using single source Dijkstra shortest path algorithm, we
calculate the distance between the node v and the target
nodes in the graph. In our case as the edge weights of
the graph are not the distance between two nodes but the
probabilities of transition, probabilities are to be multiplied when traversing through the graph. Keeping this in
mind, we converted the edge weights to their negative
natural logarithms (as natural logarithm of probabilities
which are values less than 1 give negative values, a
negative sign is added to make the weights positive).
Thus, adding logarithms corresponds to multiplication of
the probabilities. Hence, with this modification, single
source Dijkstra shortest path algorithm was applied to
find these shortest paths. Finally, for the node v, a list of
targets and the probability of reaching those targets from
the node v based on the user’s historical user navigation
graph was calculated.
• Mv : It is the fraction of the total browsing time of the
user that he spent on the node v. The word “mass” is
being used to denote the notion of weighing down i.e. if
the mass of a node is relatively high, the user is weighed
down in that node as he spends more time there compared
to the other nodes.
• αv , βv : These are the feedback factors of node v. These
factors are initialized with 1.0. However, they change on
receiving feedback.
The recommendation scoring technique is illustrated in
Figure 4. The recommendation score is generated for all nodes
v connected to the current node u, as well as for all nodes w
connected to each of the nodes v. Hence, essentially, 1-step and
2-step distanced nodes from u get a score. This calculation is
done for all the user graphs available irrespective of the current
user.
The reasoning behind the formula is henceforth explained.
The Rv gives the true score of the relation between the current
user context and intent. This score incorporates the report data
and other stimuli.
The Rv calculation results in the scoring of the intents
but it does not really deal completely with the actual history
involving the nodes to be recommended. It is more of a score
which assures that from node v a certain set of intents can
be reached or, should be reached (goals or reports which are
required to complete an analysis). However, the past user behavior might indicate other tendencies of the users. Historical
analysis might reveal that the user is always interested in
certain kinds of reports which may not always be encoded
by the contextual information. For handling such kind of
cases, multiplying the edge weight with the relevance score
makes logical sense as the edge weight itself can act like a
weighing factor to the relevance score. Thus, a node with high
Rv which a user rarely visits may not be shown as the top
recommendation due to the fact that the user is not likely to
find it useful as per their browsing history. Thus, in most cases,
it is expected that the edge weight as well as relevance should
be positively correlated and the multiplication would not
affect the ordering. However, for cases where the correlation
between the edge weight and the relevance is negative then
the multiplication plays a role in trading off each value with
each other and arriving at a more realistic prediction. Finally
the mass is added as an offset to the recommendation score.
It is generally a small factor which signifies the importance
of a node. In cases where the Rv × Wuv is similar, the mass
will determine the ranking as the actual time spent by the
user historically must be factored in. In other cases, based on
empirical analysis, the mass does not play a deciding role as
such. However, the mass attribute can be used finally to break
ties if there are any (discussed further in Section V-B).
F. Group-based Recommendations
Apart from recommending reports to a user from that user’s
graph we also recommended reports from other user graphs or
user groups. This step is especially useful for new or novice
users who do not have much personal history with the tool. For
such users, sourcing recommendations from an “experienced”
group is a good idea and it has been shown to work.
First, to identify the users, we selected user groups based
on clusters. For new or inexperienced users, we gave recommendations from clusters which contained more experienced
users. Secondly, after identifying the relevant clusters we
identified the set of users who have the same report/node in
their graph and at least one of the target node. Finally, for the
selected users, we calculated the recommendation score in a
similar manner as we calculated above but with some slight
variations. Intent scores (Rv ) are the same as the intent scores
of the original user (the user to whom the recommendations
are shown). Edge weights (Wuv ) and mass (Mv ) are taken
from the selected users’ (group) graphs. Therefore, the notion
of “distance” as discussed before is also according to those
selected users’ (group) navigation graph.
We calculated recommendation scores only for those nodes
from other users which were not present in the original user
graph i.e. nodes novel to the original users. These recommendation scores are combined with the recommendation scores
of original user to give the final set of recommendations. In the
next section we will see that feedback can be used to inform
the model and provide better recommendations.
G. Feedback
The final step of the algorithm is to gather implicit/explicit
feedback and update the system. Feedback is a very important
requirement in any ranking system as it informs the algorithm
about its own correctness and rectification can be done in the
subsequent calculations. We defined feedback in the following
situations:
Explicit positive feedback: If a user clicks on one of the
recommendations shown in the list.
• Explicit negative feedback: If a user deletes one of the
recommendations shown in the list.
• Implicit positive feedback: If a user does not click on
any of the recommendations shown in the list, however
navigates to a page which existed in that list. This is
particularly an important piece of information as this
addresses many of the problems existing in today’s
recommendation system. The recommender intelligently
identifies the actions of the user and updates accordingly.
• Implicit negative feedback: If a user does not click on any
of the recommendations shown in the list and navigates to
a page which did not exist in that list. Thus, even though
the user did not delete any recommendation, this can be
taken to be a weak signal of negative feedback.
This leads to a change in the Wuv , Mv , αv and βv values
which were introduced before. The appropriate values can be
updated on the basis of mathematical optimization methods as
well as empirical observations. Also, the updating algorithm
must be slightly different for giving feedback on 2-step nodes
compared to 1-step recommendations. A simulation system is
planned to evaluate the feedback mechanism.
•
V. E XPERIMENTS
In this section we will showcase the performance improvements of our model compared to baseline models. We will
first describe the dataset, the algorithm setup with respect to
our case and then evaluate our model with other baselines.
We also conduct several case studies to show which recommendation score is the most appropriate.
A. Dataset
We used real-world hit data. A hit corresponds to a report
access. The hit data essentially consisted of time-stamped user
activity tracking. Data was filtered to give relevant information
like timestamp, report requested, URL, metrics seen, and so
on. The data also has information related to the session which
is used to sessionize it for context modeling.
We used 10 days hit-level data. This data is taken across
different companies so the number of users varies depending
upon the company. The number of reports visited by each
user also varies depending upon his tasks. The data contained
information about the user as well as the reports visited by
each user at each timestamp. The data was finally sessionized
to understand and segregate the transitions. We trained our
model on 70% of the data (first 7 days) and tested on the
remaining 30% (last 3 days) data. Further work may be
conducted by using alternative training-testing methods like
interleaved training, increasing the percentage of the training
set, increasing the amount of overall data and so on.
B. Ranking of Recommendations
The recommendations generated using the methodology
described in Section IV are stored along with the information
such as the value of recommendation score, Rv , αv , βv , Mv ,
TABLE I
C OMPARISON OF PROPOSED SYSTEM WITH BASELINES & DIFFERENT Rv
Method
Mass
Frequency
Context Based
PARAFAC2 Model
Max-IxD
Dot-IxD
Max-I
Sum-I (proposed)
NDCG
0.4297
0.4744
0.5228
0.5470
0.4908
0.5274
0.4736
0.5706
Precision
0.0885
0.0853
0.1003
0.0987
0.1006
0.1021
0.0969
0.1006
Recall
0.6181
0.5866
0.6730
0.6343
0.6753
0.6911
0.6390
0.6753
w-AUC
0.5867
0.5866
0.7226
0.6250
0.6858
0.7165
0.6555
0.7239
Wuv and whether the node is actually the 1-step or 2-step
recommendation. Now, these generated recommendations are
ranked in the following order of preference:
1) Kuv (Descending): This is the recommendation score
obtained by using Equation (13). It is highly unlikely
that two nodes will have the same recommendation
score.
2) Collaborative or not (Preferring the recommendations
got from the current user graph over the recommendations got from the other user graphs)
3) Rv (Descending): Relevance score (Section IV-E).
4) Wuv (Descending): If a node v is not adjacent to u then
shortest path weight which is the product of probabilities
on the path is taken.
5) Mv (Descending): “Mass” of the node (Section IV-E).
C. Baselines
We tested our model against the baselines described below:
1) Frequency: Recommendation based upon the probabilistic graphical model i.e. based upon edge weights
(Wuv ) in the user navigation graph.
2) Mass (Mv ): Recommendation based upon the average
time spent on the reports seen.
3) Context: Recommendation based upon intent scores
obtained from the current context of the user.
4) Tensor Factorization: Recommendation based upon
obtaining latent factors only from PARAFAC2 tensor
decomposition (without Kalman Filter regularization).
D. Results
We tested our model on the 4 metrics: NDCG (Normalized
Discounted Cumulative Gain), Precision, Recall and w-AUC
(weighted average Area Under the Curve). The results shown
below are for the users seeing considerable number of unique
reports. The results for performance of our algorithm against
other baselines are summarized in Table 1.
It is seen that the proposed model i.e. the Markov model
with context modeling using PARAFAC2 and Kalman Filtering works better than the other models with respect to
the metrics used. The precision is near 0.1 because we set
an upper limit to the number of recommendations to be
generated to be 10 and for every recommended list, there could
be only 1 correct recommendation as testing was done by
simply checking the immediate next report access. The number
of reports seen/accessible (universe of reports) is a huge
number thus driving down overall results in case of precision.
However, it is clear from comparison that our algorithm indeed
performs better than baselines with respect to each metric.
We have also varied the recommendation scoring formula.
In this case, the general formula structure remains the same as
Eqn. (13), but the method of calculation of Rv changes. The
key for the formulae are as follows:
• Max-IxD: Rv = Maximum of (intent scores * distance
to target node)
• Dot-IxD: Rv = Dot product between intent score and
distances of node to those intents
• Max-I: Rv = Maximum of intent scores
• Sum-I: Rv = Sum of intent scores (proposed)
It is observed that Dot-IxD performs better than other methods with Precision and Recall. The intuition behind Max-IxD
is to extract the information of the most relevant and visited
nodes among the options. Similarly, the intuition behind DotIxD is to get a single score which captures not only the
maximum but encodes the information of all possible intent
scores and the distances. The proposed model in Table 1 uses
the Rv as described in the Sum-I method. The intuition behind
proposing Sum-I is the fact that it considers the relevance
scores fully without any discount and does not lead to any bias.
As we are already considering the probabilities of reaching
a node through the user navigation graph (Wuv ), it is not
necessary to encode the distance information again in Rv .
VI. C ONCLUSION
In this paper we have proposed a novel recommendation
system combining a probabilistic graphical model with tensor
factorization and Kalman filtering. Though some steps like
tensor factorization are computationally heavy, they are to
be conducted after long periods (once a day). The updating
of latent factors through Kalman filter is a fast process thus
making the system suitable for usage in real-time. From the
results, we are able to justify our hypothesis that combining
frequency and context-based recommendations should lead to
better results. Further analysis maybe conducted by tuning
the parameters and incorporating the feedback system which
should lead to improved results.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was done during an internship at Adobe Research
BigData Experience Lab, Bangalore, India in summer 2016.
The authors would like to thank Adobe Research for their
support.
R EFERENCES
[1] C.-N. Ziegler, S. M. McNee, J. A. Konstan, and G. Lausen, “Improving
recommendation lists through topic diversification,” in Proceedings of
the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’05.
New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 22–32. [Online]. Available:
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060745.1060754
[2] M. J. Pazzani and D. Billsus, Content-Based Recommendation Systems.
Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 325–341.
[3] I. Cantador, A. Bellogı́n, and D. Vallet, “Content-based recommendation
in social tagging systems,” in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM
Conference on Recommender Systems, ser. RecSys ’10. New
York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 237–240. [Online]. Available:
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1864708.1864756
[4] P. Lops, M. de Gemmis, and G. Semeraro, Content-based Recommender
Systems: State of the Art and Trends. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011,
pp. 73–105.
[5] K. Yoshii, M. Goto, K. Komatani, T. Ogata, and H. G. Okuno, “Hybrid
collaborative and content-based music recommendation using probabilistic model with latent user preferences,” in Proceedings of the 7th
International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), 2006,
pp. 296–301.
[6] M. Claypool, A. Gokhale, T. Miranda, P. Murnikov, D. Netes, and
M. Sartin, “Combining content-based and collaborative filters in an
online newspaper,” 1999.
[7] R. M. Bell and Y. Koren, “Lessons from the netflix prize challenge,”
SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 75–79, Dec. 2007. [Online].
Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1345448.1345465
[8] O. Celma, “Music recommendation and discovery,” in Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 43–85.
[9] B. L. James Davidson, P. N. Junning Liu, U. G. Taylor Van Vleet,
Y. H. Sujoy Gupta, B. L. Mike Lambert, and D. Sampath, “The
youtube video recommendation system,” in Proceedings of the fourth
ACM conference on Recommender systems, ser. RecSys ’10. New
York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 293–296. [Online]. Available:
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1864708.1864770
[10] S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme, “Factorizing
personalized markov chains for next-basket recommendation,” in
Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web,
ser. WWW ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 811–820.
[Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1772690.1772773
[11] A. Karatzoglou, X. Amatriain, L. Baltrunas, and N. Oliver, “Multiverse
recommendation: N-dimensional tensor factorization for contextaware collaborative filtering,” in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM
Conference on Recommender Systems, ser. RecSys ’10. New
York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 79–86. [Online]. Available:
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1864708.1864727
[12] G. Shroff, L. Dey, and H. Ghosh, “Enterprise contextual intelligence.”
in WI-IAT (1). IEEE Computer Society, 2014, pp. 202–209.
[13] N. Hariri, B. Mobasher, and R. D. Burke, “Context adaptation in
interactive recommender systems.” in RecSys, A. Kobsa, M. X. Zhou,
M. Ester, and Y. Koren, Eds. ACM, 2014, pp. 41–48.
[14] J. Kiseleva, H. T. Lam, M. Pechenizkiy, and T. Calders, “Predicting
current user intent with contextual markov models,” in 13th IEEE
International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDM Workshops,
TX, USA, December 7-10, 2013, 2013, pp. 391–398. [Online]. Available:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2013.143
[15] Y. Sun, N. J. Yuan, X. Xie, K. McDonald, and R. Zhang, “Collaborative
nowcasting for contextual recommendation,” in Proceedings of the 25th
International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2016, Montreal,
Canada, April 11 - 15, 2016, 2016, pp. 1407–1418. [Online]. Available:
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2872427.2874812
[16] V. Arnold, N. Clark, P. A. Collier, S. A. Leech, and S. G. Sutton, “The
differential use and effect of knowledge-based system explanations in
novice and expert judgment decisions,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp.
79–97, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148718
[17] J. Wiens, E. Horvitz, and J. V. Guttag, “Patient risk stratification
for hospital-associated c. diff as a time-series classification task,” in
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25, F. Pereira,
C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Q. Weinberger, Eds.
Curran
Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 467–475.
[18] R. A. Harshman, “PARAFAC2: Mathematical and technical notes,”
UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, vol. 22, pp. 30–44, 1972b.
[19] G. Giannopoulos, U. Brefeld, T. Dalamagas, and T. Sellis, “Learning
to rank user intent,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM International
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ser. CIKM
’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 195–200. [Online].
Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2063576.2063609
| 2cs.AI
|
1
Small Cell Offloading Through Cooperative
Communication in Software-Defined Heterogeneous
Networks
arXiv:1606.03912v4 [cs.NI] 17 May 2017
Tao Han, Member, IEEE, Yujie Han, Xiaohu Ge, Senior Member, IEEE, Qiang Li, Member, IEEE, Jing Zhang,
Member, IEEE, Zhiquan Bai, Member, IEEE, and Lijun Wang, Member, IEEE
Abstract—To meet the ever-growing demand for a higher
communicating rate and better communication quality, more
and more small cells are overlaid under the macro base station
(MBS) tier, thus forming the heterogeneous networks. Small cells
can ease the load pressure of MBS but lack of the guarantee
of performance. On the other hand, cooperation draws more
and more attention because of the great potential of small
cell densification. Some technologies matured in wired network
can also be applied to cellular networks, such as Softwaredefined networking (SDN). SDN helps simplify the structure
of multi-tier networks. And it’s more reasonable for the SDN
controller to implement cell coordination. In this paper, we
propose a method to offload users from MBSs through small cell
cooperation in heterogeneous networks. Association probability
is the main indicator of offloading. By using the tools from
stochastic geometry, we then obtain the coverage probabilities
when users are associated with different types of base stations
(BSs). All the cell association and cooperation are conducted by
the SDN controller. Then on this basis, we compare the overall
coverage probabilities, achievable rate and energy efficiency with
and without cooperation. Numerical results show that small
cell cooperation can offload more users from MBS tier. It can
also increase the system’s coverage performance. As small cells
become denser, cooperation can bring more gains to the energy
efficiency of the network.
Accepted by IEEE Sensors Journal.The authors would like to acknowledge
the support from the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China under grants 2015DFG12580 and 2014DFA11640, the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the grants 61471180,
61210002, 61301147, 61301128, 61271224 and 61461136004, the Hubei
Provincial Science and Technology Department under the grant 2013CFB188,
the Hubei Provincial Department of Education Scientific research projects
(No.B2015188), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
under the HUST grants 2015XJGH011 and 2015MS038, the grant from
Wenhua College (No.2013Y08), and the Fundamental Research Funds of
Shandong University (No. 2016JC010). This research is partially supported by
the EU FP7-PEOPLE-IRSES, project acronym S2EuNet (grant no. 247083),
project acronym WiNDOW (grant no. 318992) and project acronym CROWN
(grant no. 610524). This research is supported by the National international
Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Green Communications and
Networks (No. 2015B01008) and the Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Green Broadband Wireless Communications.
(Corresponding author: Xiaohu Ge.)
Tao Han, Yujie Han, Xiaohu Ge, Qiang Li and Jing Zhang are with the
School of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University
of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074 P.R. China, e-mail: {hantao,
hanyujie, xhge, qli_patrick, zhangjing}@hust.edu.cn.
Zhiquan Bai is with the School of Information Science and Engineering,
Shandong University, Jinan, 250100 China, e-mail: [email protected].
Lijun Wang is with the Department of Information Science and Technology,
Wenhua College, Wuhan, 430074 P.R. China, e-mail: [email protected].
Copyright (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted.
However, permission to use this material for any other purposes must be
obtained from the IEEE by sending a request to [email protected].
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2581804
Index Terms—Small cell cooperation, heterogeneous network,
offloading, energy efficiency, software-defined networking.
I. I NTRODUCTION
LONG with the huge increasing of mobile users, the
current wireless communication system is facing with
the great challenges of system capacity and quality-of-service
(QoS) requirements [1]. 5G is expected to achieve gigabit-level
throughput and more varied service capabilities in an energyefficient way by 2020 [2], [3]. In [4] and [5], mobile cloud and
wearable computing is implemented in 5G to improve Quality
of Experience (QoE) and overcome the energy bottleneck.
The deployment of small cells seems to be one of the most
feasible solutions for the areas with a large traffic demand.
Heterogeneous networks (HetNets) where macro and small
cells coexist have been widely applied [6]. BSs in different
tiers differ in transmit power, coverage range, and spatial
density. In HetNets, small cells serve to offload users and
traffic data from congested macro BSs (MBSs) [7]. Compare
to traditional MBSs, small cell base stations (SBSs) have
smaller coverage areas [8] but with the advantage of less
transmit power and easy deployment. It will also cut down
the construction cost significantly. [9] shows that there’s a
significant gain in power consumption by introducing the small
cell tier. However, multi-tier and denser small cells bring a
serious problem, users have to suffer more severe interference.
The deployment of SBSs is still an effective complement to
traditional MBS on coverage and capacity. Over the multitier HetNets, mobile converged networks have become a focus
recently [10], [11].
Cooperative communication has been deemed as a solution
to address the interference problem [12], [13]. Coordinated
multipoint (CoMP) transmission is one of the key technologies
to improve cell edge user data rate and spectral efficiency.
Interference can be exploited or mitigated by cooperation
between BSs [14]. [15] proposes macrodiversity coordinated
multipoint transmission (MD-CoMP) with user-centric adaptive clustering, which can significantly improve the coverage
performance in different networks. [16] introduces a novel
cooperation policy which triggers cooperation only when the
user lies inside a planar zone at the edge of the cell. In general,
the system’s overall performance can be improved by utilizing
cooperation. Considering the benefits of cooperation among
SBSs and small cell offloading in HetNets, we propose a novel
A
2
scheme to combine them together, and thus improving energy
efficiency (EE) of the networks.
The convergence of various technologies is inevitable. Significant data manipulation, the evolution of equipment and
complex protocols set higher requirements for BS controller.
In HetNets, coordination between different tiers is also difficult
because of their different protocols and interfaces. Softwaredefined networking (SDN) has shown its important role in
the wired networks by decoupling the control plane and data
plane [17], [18]. The SDN controller is software-based and the
entire network is abstracted in it. This centralization makes
it easy to control the network behavior. Applying SDN to
the traditional radio access networks (RAN) is a promising
way. In [19] various SDN principles are described to apply
to the RAN. It shows great potential for RAN optimization.
To enable software-defined cellular networks, authors in [20]
presents several changes and extensions to controller platforms
and BSs. With SDN controller, information exchanged between BSs can be effectively reduced and backhaul power
consumption reduces as well, thus improving the efficiency of
BS cooperation.
A. Related Work
In recent years, people start to concentrate on cooperation in
HetNets. Most of them put forward the coordination between
different tiers, i.e., the cross-tier cooperation. [12] presents
an overview of the multi-cell cooperation. It can dramatically
improve the system performance in dense networks where
interference emerges as the key capacity-limiting factor. [21]
analyzes the coverage probability of a general user that locates
at an arbitrary location. For the general user, the cooperative
set consists of the BSs with the strongest average received
power in each tier. Similarly, in [22] the authors consider a
cell association based on maximum biased-received-power. It
confirms that a user prefers to connect to a tier with higher
BS density and transmit power. [23] proposes a Markov chain
based channel access model and integrates it into random
cellular networks. [24] and [25] propose non-coherent jointtransmission cooperation. The former characterizes the signal
to interference and noise ratio (SINR) distribution for a typical
user served by cooperating BSs. BSs that are sufficiently close
are grouped into a cooperative cluster. [25] extends the work
to heterogeneous networks. In [26] the authors demonstrate
that BS cooperation in HetNets achieves higher throughput
gains because of the mitigation of inter-cell interference
through cooperation. Considering the user mobility in real
life, [27] and [28] study the system performance based on the
Gauss–Markov mobile models and individual mobility model
respectively. Authors in [29] propose a framework called GNV
(Global Network View) in SDN. The related information and
states are stored in it and can be visited by applications and
modules. This kind of global view of the network helps the
implement of some complicated technologies like CoMP.
In a network with dense small cells, BS density is a
considerable factor that influences the system’s performance.
To minimize the network energy consumption, [30] gives the
optimal BS density for both homogeneous and heterogeneous
networks. In [31] the authors figure out the BS density ratio
that makes the system get the best energy efficiency. Within the
constraints of backhaul capacity and energy efficiency, authors
in [32] prove that there exists a density limit in 5G ultra-dense
networks. Energy efficiency is what people always endeavor
for, especially for the next-gen communications. Results in
[33] reveal that BSs’ cooperation will bring gains to the
energy efficiency only when most of the BSs participate in the
cooperation. [34] formulates a power minimization problem
with the minimum ergodic rate constraint and shows that the
extra deployment of small cells is energy-saving compared
to the traditional macro-only network under its cooperation
scheme. Sleeping strategy is also an effective way to save
energy in HetNets [35], [36].
One purpose of deploying SBSs is to offload users from
the MBS tier. Small cell’s low transmit power makes it
offload enough users in an energy-efficient way. Cell range
expansion (CRE) [6] is a practical technique in which users
can be offloaded with biasing. In [37] the authors calculate the appropriate range expansion bias for two different
range expansion strategies. For coverage maximization, the
required selection bias is given in [38]. [39] shows that
the offloading strategy, coupled with resource partitioning is
able to improve the rate of cell edge users in HetNets. [7]
evaluates the load of each network tier and studies different
offloading techniques used to control the load. The traffic
offloading is quantified via the tier association probability. [40]
proposes two offloading algorithms, called Traffic Offloading
(TO) algorithm based on the Reference Signal Receive Power
and Traffic Offloading based on Frequency Reuse (TOFFR)
algorithm. User association has been studied to balance the
loads among different tiers [41], [42], [43]. With the related
load information and centralized manipulation in SDN, it
will be more convenient to address the offloading problems.
In [44], data offloading optimization is coordinated by the
SDN controller dynamically on the offloading demand and
supply. [45] proposes a novel software-defined small cell
offloading control mechanism (SDoff) that can orchestrate the
offloading according to the proposed dissatisfaction parameter
and user types. These applications can also be assisted by
software-defined network function virtualization (VFN) which
decouples the network functions from the hardware [46].
B. Contributions and Organizations
The main contributions of our work can be summarized as
follows:
• We propose a novel offloading scheme through small cell
cooperation in a software defined 2-tier network where
BSs in each tier are distributed independently according
to a Poisson point process (PPP). In the cooperative
model, with the help of the SDN controller, multiple
adjacent SBSs cooperate to transmit data to a specified
user if they can jointly offer stronger signal than the
MBS. Thus it can offload more users from the MBS
tier compare to one SBS. For the single BS association,
the user will connect to the nearest BS. We evaluate the
association probabilities to measure the cell’s traffic load.
3
We propose a dynamic power consumption model for
our non-cooperative and cooperative schemes, where the
power consumption of a BS changes with its load, i.e.,
the number of users associated with it.
• We evaluate the performance of the proposed schemes in
terms of coverage probability, mean achievable rate and
energy efficiency by using tools from stochastic geometry.
Expressions of each metric are obtained. And they are
analyzed under different system parameters by varying
the SINR thresholds, BS densities and transmit power.
• We show that the proposed SBS cooperation scheme is
able to offload more users from the MBS tier. Meanwhile,
it can offer better coverage and achievable rate for a
typical user in a more energy efficient way. Benefits of
deploying more SBSs can be seen from our discussion.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. A tractable
model for a downlink 2-tier network is presented in Section
II. And then we propose the offloading scheme and power
consumption model. In Section III, we derive expressions of
the coverage probabilities, as well as distance analysis in the
non-cooperative and cooperative model. Then on the basis of
coverage probability, average rate and energy efficiency are
obtained. Simulations are conducted in Section IV to show
the performance comparison between our cooperative model
and non-cooperative model. Section V concludes the paper
and points out the future prospects.
•
Let xi,j be the location of the j-th BS in tier i and ri,j be the
distance from xi,j to the typical user, hi,j be the corresponding
channel coefficient. Here, i ∈ {s, m} and s, m denote the SBS
tier and MBS tier respectively. In this paper, we consider a
Rayleigh fading model to characterize the channel fading, i.e.,
hi,j ∼ exp(1). α > 2 is the path loss exponent for both tiers.
Wireless control plane
SDN Controller
MBS
User
User
User
SBS
User
User
SBS
SBS User
Wireless data plane
Fig. 1. A software defined heterogeneous network with small cell cooperation
II. S YSTEM M ODEL
We consider a software defined HetNet composed of two
independent tiers of network, i.e., the macro BS network and
the small cell BS network. Both tiers are independent with
different deployment densities and transmit powers. The BSs
belonging to the MBS and SBS tier have transmit powers Pm ,
Ps and follow homogeneous Poisson point processes (PPPs)
Φm , Φs ∈ R2 with densities λm , λs respectively. All the BSs
and users are assumed to be equipped with a single antenna.
Without any loss of generality, we focus on a typical user at
the origin. A simple case of a software defined 2-tier HetNet
composed of a single MBS and multiple SBSs is illustrated
in Fig. 1, where users can be served by BSs from the two
tiers. All BSs are connected to the SDN controller by wireless
links. Thus the control plane and data plane are separated.
All connections are configured by the OpenFlow protocol,
which is proposed to standardize the communications between
the data plane and control plane [47]. Through these links,
BSs can transmit the related state information to the SDN
controller which sends the control information back to BSs. In
this case, applications, such as cooperation and radio resource
allocation are managed by the SDN controller in the control
plane. It is similar to the measurement flows and control
flows presented in [48], that are used to collect information
and control underlying hardware and software respectively.
Here, it is feasible for a user to simultaneously connect to
several cells in HetNets. We consider an orthogonal frequency
division multiple access (OFDMA) system adopted for BSs.
It means that no intra-cell interference exists, but users will
suffer interferences from other BSs in both tiers.
A. Small Cell Offloading
In the HetNet, the deployment of small cell BSs is able to
offload users from the MBSs. It can ease the traffic burden
of the MBSs and improve the system’s performance to some
extent. For example, CRE of the small cells is a common way
to offload users from the MBS tier and increases the coverage.
In any case, the existing study focuses on the offloading ability
of a single small cell. Besides, MBS can reduce its dynamic
power consumption when it is lightly loaded. Offloading users
to SBSs when they can offer better communication quality
can reduce the load of MBS and possibly reduce the energy
consumption of the entire network. In our study, we analyze
the offloading performance of the cooperation of small cells.
For simplicity, the resource partition between different tiers is
not considered.
In this scenario, a user is allowed to access any tier’s BSs
because of open access. We consider a cell association based
on maximum received-signal-strength (RSS). Covered by the
closest MSB and SBS, the user will choose one that offers
higher RSS as its serving BS [7]. Thus a user is always
associated to either an MBS or an SBS.
1) Non-cooperative model: A user will associate with the
BS that results in the highest RSS. As the BSs belonging to the
same tier have the same transmit power, it means a user will
choose its closest MBS or SBS as its serving BS. It’s called
the non-cooperative operation. We use association probability
to measure the traffic offloading.
4
Lemma 1. The probability that a user associates with SBS
tier can be expressed as
Psbs_no =
1+
λm
λs
1
Pm
Ps
α2 .
(1)
Psbs_co
=
P
X
Z
Psbs_no
−α
= 1 − P Pm rm
> Ps rs
h
i
1/α
α
Ps /Pm )
= 1 − Erm P rs > (rm
Z ∞
1/α
frm (r) dr,
P rs > (rα Ps /Pm )
= 1−
−α
−α
Ps rs,j
> Pm rm
e(−λm πη
where η = Pm / Ps
xP
s,k
−α
rs,j
!
and it is proved in [49] that
frm (r) =
2
d (1 − P [rm > r])
= 2πλm re(−πλm r ) .
dr
) f (r) dr,
Γ
(4)
and rs,j denotes the distance
of the j-th closest small cell to the typical user.
It can be proved by referring to Lemma 1. r =
[rs,1 , rs,2 , ...., rs,k−1 , rs,k ] is the set of the distances of the
k closest small cells to the typical user.
Lemma 2. The joint PDF of rs,j is
0
where rm and rs are the distances from the typical user to its
nearest MBS and SBS and its probability density functions
(PDFs) are frm (r) and frs (r). It is known that the null
probability of the 2-D homogeneous PPP with density λ in
α
an area A is exp (−λA), so rs > (rm
Ps /Pm )1/α means that
α
there’s no BS in the circle whose radius is (rm
Ps /Pm )1/α in
the small cell tier. Thus,
2
2/α
1/α
= e(−λs πr (Ps /Pm ) ) , (2)
P rs > (rα Ps /Pm )
2/α
0<rs,1 <rs,2...
rs,k−1 <rs,k <∞
xs,j ∈C
−α
xs,k
xs,j ∈C
=
−α
Proof: Pm rm
and Ps rs−α are the RSS received by the
typical user from its nearest MBS and SBS respectively. The
user will access to the tier which can offer it stronger RSS.
Therefore
xs,k
fΓ (r) = (2πλs ) e(−λs πrs,k )
k
2
Y
rs,j .
(5)
xs,j ∈C
Proof: We start from the first and second closest neighbor
SBSs. We define frs,2 |rs,1 (rs,2 | rs,1 ) as the conditional PDF
of the distance of the second closest SBS. Around the typical
user, with radiuses of rs,1 and rs,2 , it forms an annulus. In
analogy to (3), the probability that
there’s no SBS in this
2
2
. So,
annulus is exp −λs π rs,2
− rs,1
frs,2 |rs,1 (rs,2 | rs,1 ) = 2πλs e(−λs π(rs,2 −rs,1 )) rs,2 ,
2
(3)
Then by solving the exponential integral, it can be simplified
as (1).
From the above, we can see that in order to change the load
of each tier, it just needs to adjust the BS density and power
ratio λm /λs and Pm /Ps . Although deploying more SBSs
will bring extra costs, the tendency of small cell densification
has proved that the capacity of heterogeneous networks can
be dramatically improved. Comparing with the method of
adjusting transmit powers, deploying more SBSs seems to be
a more reasonable way to offload users from MBS.
2) Cooperative model: To meet the exponential growth of
traffic demands, small cell densification is a promising way. As
small cells are getting closer, cooperation can benefit more. In
our proposed network model, the SDN controller coordinates
the cooperation among SBSs by gathering information, such
as channel states, BSs and users. It decouples processing
from transmission within the data plane to make cooperation
practically feasible. We call the cooperative small cells an
SBS cluster. In the cooperative operation, the cooperative
cluster consists of k closest small cells, denoted by C ⊂ Φs .
The cooperative small cells jointly transmit a message to the
typical user. In other words, the user will associate with the
cooperative cluster or the MBS depending on its RSS. The
association probability of the cooperative model is
2
and by using Bayes formula, we have
frs,2 ,rs,1 (rs,2 , rs,1 ) =
=
frs,2 |rs,1 (rs,2 | rs,1 ) frs (r)
2
(2πλs )2 e(−λs πrs,2 ) rs,1 rs,2 .
(6)
In a similar way, we can easily obtain the joint PDF of the
k-th closest cooperative SBSs expressed as (5).
It’s obvious that the SBS cluster can offer stronger RSS
comparing with the single SBS association. So it will offload
more users to the small cell tier. But it adds extra complexity
to both the transmit side and receive side.
So in the non-cooperative model, we define Am (As ) as
the event that the user connects to an MBS (SBS). In the
cooperative model, we define Bm (Bs ) as the event that the
user connects to an MBS (SBS cluster).
Small cell cooperation will offload more users from the
MBS tier and provide better coverage performance compared
with a single small cell. The communication quality will
improve dramatically especially for the cell-edge users. In
addition, cooperation is also an effective means to reduce
interferences. However, cooperation is a complex work for
small cells to perform, and deploying more cells causes
additional costs in the future.
5
III. SINR C OVERAGE
B. Power Consumption Model
We consider the power consumption in a Voronoi cell [16]
consisting of an MBS and several users. A Voronoi cell associated with a given MBS is the set of all points in R2 which are
closer to it than to any other MBSs. The power consumption is
load-dependent for MBSs, and to a lesser extent for SBSs [50].
We introduce SDN controller to manage the power control
of BSs. Utilizing the load information of the BS, the SDN
controller notifies the BS to turn on/off some channels for
dynamically adjusting the BS power consumption.
1) Non-cooperative model: The power consumption of an
MBS is proportional to its current load, which is the number
of users associated with it. The total power consumption of
the MBS under non-cooperative model is
Pmbs_no = Pms + nPmax (1−P sbs_no ) /N,
(7)
where Pms denotes the static power expenditure, such as
processing unit and radio module. Pmax is the maximum
output power. n is the number of users in the Voronoi cell, N
is the maximum number of the users when the MBS is full
loaded and quality of communication can also be guaranteed
in the meantime. n (1−P sbs_no ) denotes the number of users
connecting to the MBS. The output power is determined by
the ratio n (1−P sbs_no ) /N .
Since the power consumption of small cell is low and most
part of it is static consumption which is Ps , we assume the
energy consumption of the small cells which the users in the
Voronoi cell associate with is
Psbs_no = nPsbs_no Ps .
(8)
We define the total power consumption of the system as the
energy needed to serve all the users in the Voronoi cell, which
is Pno = Pmbs_no + Psbs_no .
2) Cooperative model: In the cooperative model, as more
users choose the small cell tier, the number of users connecting
to MBS turns to n (1−Psbs_co ), so the total energy consumption
of the MBS is
Pmbs_co = Pms + nPmax (1−Psbs_co )/N.
(9)
If k small cells cooperate, that means a user is served by
k BSs simultaneously. Due to the low power consumption of
small cell, it can be assumed that there are totally knPsbs_co
small cells serving for users in a Voronoi cell. So the energy
consumption of the small cells is
Psbs_co = knPsbs_co (Ps + Pbkh ) .
(10)
E NERGY E FFICIENCY
A. SINR Coverage Probability
The received signal at a typical user can be written as
X (P hi,j )1/2
α/2
xi,j ∈B
ri,j
X+
X (P hi,j )1/2
α/2
xi,j ∈B
/
ri,j
Y + Z,
(11)
where P is the transmit power of the serving BS. B denotes
the set of BSs that the user associate with, it may be an MBS,
an SBS or an SBS cluster. X denotes the input symbol that
is sent by the associated BSs. So the first sum denotes the
useful signal from the associated BSs. Y denotes the input
symbol sent by the BSs that do not belong to B. So the second
sum denotes the interference, including the inter-tier and intratier interference. Z is a circular-symmetric zero-mean complex
Gaussian random variable with variance σ 2 , which models the
additive white noise.
Thus, from [21] and [51], the received instantaneous SINR
at a typical user is given by
P
−α/2
(P hi,j )/ ri,j |2
|
SINR (B) =
xi,j ∈B
|
P
xi,j ∈B
/
−α/
|
(P hi,j )/ ri,j
+σ
.
(12)
The coverage probability is defined as the probability that
the received SINR is greater than a threshold. For a given
SINR threshold θ, the coverage probability Pn at the typical
user can be expressed as
Pn = P (SINR > θ),
(13)
and Pn is relevant to the user’s association policy.
Lemma 3. To connect the link between the coverage and
the association policy, we analyze the PDFs of the distance
between a typical user and its serving BS or BSs, i.e., fR (r).
In the non-cooperative model, when the user connects to an
MBS or an SBS, the PDFs are respectively
fRm (r) =
and
Pbkh is the backhaul power consumption for each cooperative SBS. To serve a common user, the cooperative SBSs have
to share data with each other, so the backhaul overhead has to
be considered. When traffic load of MBS is offloaded to SBS,
the dynamic power consumption of MBS decreases. This will
be more remarkable in the cooperative model.
So the total power consumption for the cooperative model
is Pco = Pmbs_co + Psbs_co .
AND
In this section, we analyze the offloading performance
through three main metrics: SINR coverage, user rates, and
energy efficiency. First, we will discuss the SINR for downlink
transmission at a typical user under different association
strategies. Then, we derive the analytical expressions for the
coverage probability and the average ergodic rate. On the basis
of the above analysis, we can get the energy efficiency of the
system under both cooperative and non-cooperative schemes.
2πλm r (−πr2 (λm +λs (Ps /Pm )2/α ))
,
e
1 − Psbs_no
(14)
2πλs r (−πr2 (λs +λm (Pm /Ps )2/α ))
.
e
Psbs_no
(15)
fRs (r) =
As the association probability changes, the distance distribution changes as well. In the cooperative model, the PDF of
the distance between the user and the MBS is
fr (r) g(r)
,
(16)
fRcm (r) = m
1 − Psbs_co
6
where g(r) =P Pm r
−α
/Ps >
xP
s,k
xs,j ∈C
−α
rs,j
!
is the function of
r. frm (r) is given as (3).
If the user connects to an SBS cluster, the joint PDF is
fRcs (r)
=
2/α
1
e(−πλm η ) fΓ (r) .
Psbs_co
(17)
Proof: See Appendix A.
Remark 4. Note that there is no general analytical expression
for g(r) in (16), we can derive an exact result for a special
case for simplicity, as shown later in our simulation. Here, we
consider two SBSs cooperation and α = 4. So we have
Z π4
2
sr
πλs sin−1 ϕ + ωr−2 − ωπλsin
ϕ
dϕ,
(18)
g(r) =
e
2
(cos ϕr−1 ) ω
0
p
where ω = Pm /Ps .
Proof: See Appendix B.
Theorem 5. The coverage probabilities for a typical user
associated with an MBS, an SBS in non-cooperative model
are
Pn (Am ) =
Z
h
i
−1
α 2
− α
fRm (r) dr,
θr
e(−Pm θr σ ) LI Pm
Pn (As ) =
Z
h
i
−1
α 2
e(−Ps θr σ ) LI Ps− θrα fRs (r) dr,
r>0
r>0
(19)
(20)
where distance distributions are given in Lemma 3. And
LI (s) =
Y
e(−2πλi (sPi )
2/α
F ((sPi )−/α di ,α))
.
Pno =
1
√
√
1 + θ tan−1
θ .
(24)
For this special case, the total outage probability in the
non-cooperative model is just the function of threshold θ and
there exists a negative correlation between them. This is the
same as the result in [52], where the coverage probability has
nothing to do with the number of the tiers or their densities
and transmit powers in an interference-limited network. The
adjustment in the properties of the BSs is helpless to improve
the coverage performance. In other words, we can deploy more
BSs to improve the throughput and ignoring the interference
they cause.
Theorem 7. In the cooperative model, when the user associates with an MBS we can obtain its coverage probability Pn (Bm ) by substituting fRcm (r) for fRm (r) in (19).
When the user associates with an SBS cluster, its coverage
probability Pn (Bs ) is shown as (25). Same as the coverage
probabilities in non-cooperative model, for Pn (Bm ) we have
dm = r and ds ≈ ω −2/α r. And for Pn (Bs ), we have
dm = η 1/α and ds = rs,k .
Proof: See Appendix C.
The overall coverage probability of the user in the cooperative model is
(21)
i∈{s,m}
It denotes the Laplace transform of interference I. di is the
minimum distance between the user and its nearest interfering
BS in tier i, i ∈ {s, m} . It means all interfering BSs are
distributed outside the circle with the radius di . For (19), we
have dm = r and ds = ω −2/α r. For (20), we have dm =
ω 2/α r and ds = r. And
Z ∞
µ
F (y, α) =
dµ.
(22)
α
y 1+µ
Proof: See Appendix C.
Since the association methods are mutually exclusive, by
using the law of total probability, we obtain the overall
coverage probability of the non-cooperative model as follow:
Pno = (1 − Psbs_no ) Pn (Am ) + Psbs_no Pn (As ) ,
F (y, ) = 12 tan−1 y −2 . Note that in the interferencelimited network, when σ 2 is small enough, the first exponential
term in (19) and (20) approaches 1. Here, in consideration
of the situation and conciseness of the numerical analysis,
assuming α = 4 and σ 2 = 0, we have the result Pn (Am ) =
Pn (As ). And the total outage probability (23) simplifies to
(23)
where Psbs_no is given in (1).
In view of the big advantage in transmit power, MBS can
offer better coverage performance than the SBS under the same
threshold θ. In addition, an SBS user may be subjected to more
cross-tier interference.
Remark 6. We can get the closed-form expressions for specific
values of the integral function (22) [21]. Then we can get
Pco = (1 − Psbs_co ) Pn (Bm ) + Psbs_co Pn (Bs ) .
(26)
When k = 1, (25) degrades into (20). In the SBS tier, if the
user associates with only one BS, its second nearest neighbor
BS becomes its strongest interference. Same for the k-th
nearest neighbor. So if we bring in cooperation, the strongest
interference turns into useful signal. As k increases, this
advantage will be more obvious. Even two SBSs cooperate, it
may have a better coverage performance than the MBS user.
For the cell-edge users who are far from the MBS, a single
SBS is not able to satisfy its requirements for communication.
Cooperation could solve this problem. Because cooperation
needs BSs to exchange data with each other, simply increasing
k is not an optimal solution. And it is also not practical for
the mobile users to connect to too many BSs at the same time.
B. Mean Achievable Rate
With the conditional coverage probability above, we
can easily obtain the mean achievable rates (measured in
(bit/sec/Hz)) of non-cooperative and cooperative models respectively.
Theorem 8. The achievable rate of a typical user can be
expressed as
Z ∞
1
1
dθ,
(27)
Pn
τ=
ln 2 0
1+θ
7
Pn (Bs ) =
Z
0<rs,1 <rs,2...
rs,k−1 <rs,k <∞
−θσ 2
θ
exp xs,k
LI xs,k
fRcs (r) dr
P
P
−α
−α
Ps rs,j
Ps rs,j
xs,j ∈C
where Pn is the coverage probability of the given user. After
substituting Pn (Am ) , Pn (As ) , Pn (Bm ) and Pn (Bs ) into
(27), we can get the achievable rates when user associates to
the corresponding BS, which are τmbs , τsbs and τmbs_co , τmbs_co .
Proof: The mean achievable rate of the typical user is
defined as
τ
= E [log (1 + SINR)]
1
=
E [ln (1 + SINR)]
ln 2 Z
∞
1
P SINR > et − 1 dt
=
ln 2 0
Z ∞
1
1
dθ.
P (SINR > θ)
=
ln 2 0
1+θ
Here using the change of variables and the definition of the
coverage probability (13) we can obtain the final result.
According to the mutual independence of different association strategy, by using the law of total probability, we get the
mean achievable rate for a user in non-cooperative model as
τno = (1 − Psbs_no ) τmbs + Psbs_no τsbs .
(28)
Similarly, the mean achievable rate in the cooperative model
is
τco = (1 − Psbs_co ) τmbs_co + Psbs_co τsbs_co .
(29)
C. Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency is one of the key performance indicators
for the proposed model. We define it as the ratio of throughput
to the energy consumption of the network (usually measured
in (bits/J)). It is assumed that BSs in different tiers share
the same frequency bandwidth B. Since we have derived the
achievable rate τ , the throughput of a typical user is τ B. For
a Voronoi cell, it includes all the BSs that serve the users
in the cell. Numbers of the users and BSs are given in II-B.
The total system throughput of the non-cooperative model and
cooperative model are respectively derived as
Rno = nτno B,
(30)
Rco = nτco B.
(31)
and
Thus, the expressions of the corresponding energy efficiency
of the non-cooperative model and cooperative model are
Eno = Rno /Pno ,
(32)
Eco = Rco /Pco
(33)
and
respectively.
(25)
xs,j ∈C
IV. N UMERICAL R ESULTS
In this section, the traffic offloading performance with
cooperative and non-cooperative models has been compared by
numerical results. Without loss of generality, two small cells
cooperative scenarios are analyzed and σ 2 = 0 is configured
in numerical simulations. The comparison is performed in
terms of coverage probability, association probability, average
achievable rate and energy efficiency.
A. Coverage Probability
Fig. 2 shows the coverage probability trends with SINR
threshold corresponding to event Am , As , Bm and Bs .
The coverage probability decreases as the SINR threshold
increases. The curves of the SBS and MBS are the same in
non-cooperative model. In this interference-limited regime, the
user just connects to a BS that offers the highest RSS without
differentiating between the tiers. When two SBSs cooperates
the coverage probability has been dramatically improved and
is higher than the coverage probability transmitted by an MBS.
Fig. 3 depicts the overall coverage probabilities of the noncooperative and cooperative model with respect to the SINR
threshold. The overall coverage probability with the noncooperative and cooperative model decreases with the increase
of the SINR threshold. When the SINR threshold has been
fixed, the overall coverage probability with the cooperative
model is higher than that of the non-cooperative model. It
demonstrates that the cooperation can offer better coverage.
Fig. 4 shows the effect of SBS density and the transmit
power of MBS on the overall coverage probability in the
cooperative model. As the SBS density grows, coverage probabilities increase and this trend slows down gradually when
λs /λm is larger than 30. That’s because the user will associate
with the SBS cluster with a significant possibility if λs is big
enough. As the transmit power of MBS Pm increases, there’s
more chance that the user will associate with an MBS. But
based on the result in Fig. 3, the SBS cooperation offer a
better coverage. So the overall coverage probability decreases
with the increase of Pm .
B. Traffic load
As mentioned in II-A, we use association probability to
evaluate small cell offloading. It can be seen from Fig.
5, if small cells are deployed denser, they will have more
chance to serve the user. And the rising trends recede as λm
increases. The association probability of cooperative model
always outperforms the non-cooperative model owe to the
large RSS of the SBS cooperation.
8
0.44
1
MS non−coop
SBS non−coop
MS coop
2 SBSs coop
0.9
0.42
0.4
0.7
Coverage Probability
Coverage Probability
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.38
0.36
0.34
0.32
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.28
0.1
0.26
P =10
0
−15
−10
−5
0
5
SINR Threshold (in dB)
10
15
0.24
20
m
Pm=50
P =100
m
0
10
20
30
λ /λ
s
Fig. 2. Coverage
probabilities when the user connects to different BSs. α = 4,
−1
λm = 5002 π
, λs = 50λm and Pm = 50, Ps = 1.
40
50
60
70
m
Fig. 4. Overall coverage probability
of the cooperative model under different
−1
Pm and λs . λm = 5002 π
θ = 5 and Ps = 1.
0.8
1
non−coop
coop
0.9
non−coop
coop
0.7
Association Probability
Overall Coverage Probability
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
−15
−10
−5
0
5
SINR Threshold (in dB)
10
15
20
Fig. 3. Overall coverage probability
of the non-cooperative and cooperative
−1
, λs = 50λm and Pm = 50, Ps = 1.
model where λm = 5002 π
C. Energy Efficiency
Fig. 6 gives the mean achievable rate of a typical user in
the two models. We still focus on the impact of the small cell
density. According to the figure, the user rate is constant as
λs increases. We can see from (27) that user rate is deduced
from the coverage probability. (24) is independent with the cell
densities and transmit power, so there’s no doubt that the mean
achievable rate is invariant for λs /λm in the non-cooperative
model. In the cooperative model, the rate is a rising curve and
the trend is steady. Deploying more SBSs brings the SBSs
closer to the user, thus SINR and rate of the user becomes
higher.
Fig. 7 shows the energy efficiency of the non-cooperative
and cooperative model in a Voronoi cell. The shape of the
curves is as similar with that of the user rate shown in Fig. 6.
In the non-cooperative model, the energy efficiency decreases
with the increase of the λs /λm . This really distracts from our
main goal. In the cooperative model, when λs < 3λm the energy efficiency experiences a slight decrease. When λs > 3λm
it keeps up increase. Considering the result in Fig. 5 , when λs
is small, user is more likely to associate with the MBS other
0
5
10
λs /λm
15
20
Fig. 5. Comparison of the association probability between
−1 non-cooperative
and Pm = 50,
and cooperative model where α = 3, λm = 5002 π
Ps = 2.
than the cooperative SBSs. When λs = 6λm , the two curves
meet and Eco starts to transcend Eno . Hence, we can draw the
conclusion that small cell offloading through cooperation have
better energy efficiency in a dense environment.
In our work, we analyze n users in a Voronoi cell where
there’s one MBS and several SBSs to serve these users. The
number of SBSs is decided by n and is constant, and many
of the SBSs may even locate outside the Voronoi cell. In the
cooperative model, as λs increases, there won’t be more SBSs
to serve these n users, thus the energy consumption won’t
increase significantly. Meanwhile, an increase in λs means
the SBSs are closer to the users, so the user rate will improve
through cooperation. These changes make EE improves as λs
increases.
V. C ONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we have proposed a novel offloading strategy
through small cell cooperation. Using tools from stochastic
geometry, a tractable model has been proposed in the downlink
HetNets. The SDN controller has been introduced to manage
the SBS cooperation and power control, which simplifies the
9
model, the probability of the event of Rm > r is
2.8
non−coop
coop
P [Rm > r] =
Average Users Rate(bits/s/Hz)
2.7
P [rm > r | Am ]
P [rm > r, Am ]
P [Am ]
−α
P [rm > r, Pm rm
> Ps rs−α ]
1 − Psbs_no
R∞
−/α
frm (r) dr
r P rs > rω
, (34)
1 − Psbs_no
=
2.6
=
2.5
2.4
=
2.3
2.2
2.1
0
5
10
λ /λ
s
15
20
m
Fig. 6. Mean achievable rateof the non-cooperative and cooperative model
−1
where α = 4, λm = 5002 π
, Pm = 50, Ps = 2 and B = 20MHz.
6
2.3
where
rm is the idistance of the nearest MBS,
h
/α
, frm (r) and Psbs_no can be
P rs > (Ps rα /Pm )
>r|Am ]
.
found in Lemma 1. Then we can get fRm (r) = dP[rmdr
Proofs of (15) is the same under the condition of As .
For (16),
xs,k
X
−α
−α
P [rm > r, Bm ] = P rm > r, Pm rm
Ps rs,j
>
xs,j ∈C
x 10
non−coop
coop
Z
=
r
Energy Efficiency(bits/Joule)
2.25
P r < η /α frm (r) dr. (35)
For (17), we can get joint probability
Z
i
h
P r > η 1/α fΓ (r) dr (36)
P [rm > r, Bs ] =
2.2
0<rs,1 <rs,2...
rs,k−1 <rs,k <∞
2.15
as similar with the numerator in (34). After the multiple
integral we can obtain the result.
2.1
2.05
∞
0
5
10
λs /λm
15
20
Fig. 7. The system’s energy efficiency of the non-cooperative and cooperative
−1
, Pm = 50, Ps = 2, B = 20MHz
model where α = 4, λm = 5002 π
and Pms = 20, Pbkh = 1.
BS’s function and burden. In proposed cooperative-model, two
or more small cells could serve a common user simultaneously.
The user connects to an MBS or an SBS cluster depending
on its RSS. In our study the power consumption of BS is
determined by its load, which is represented by the association probability. We obtain the expressions of the overall
coverage probabilities, achievable rate for a typical user with
and without cooperation. Numerical results have shown that
small cell cooperation could offload more users from MBS
tier. It can also increase the system’s coverage performance.
It’s been proved that when SBSs get closer, cooperation can
benefit more and thus shows the great potential of small cell
densification.
A PPENDIX B
P ROOF OF R EMARK 4
The proof of (18) is under the condition that k = 2 and
α = 4. So
g (r)
=
−
−
P ω r− > rs,
+ rs,
−
−
,
+ rs,
P ωr− > rs,
(37)
drs,1
da
3
so this probability is constrained in an area which within a
circle with radius ωr−2 and the area 0 < rs,1 < rs,2 < ∞.
−
−
, the joint probability of a and b can
Set a = rs,
and b = rs,
be expressed as
1
1
(38)
fa,b (a, b) = J frs,2 ,rs,1 a− 2 , b− 2 ,
where Jacob determinant | J |=
0
drs,2
db
=
1
4
(ab)− 2 .
0
As it concerned to the circle area, we use the polar transformation, so a = ρ cos ϕ and b = ρ sin ϕ. Finally we have
A PPENDIX A
P ROOF OF L EMMA 3
g (r) =
fR (r) is a conditional PDF under different association
circumstance. So for the MBS association in non-cooperative
=
Z
0
π
4
dϕ
Z
ωr −2
ρfa,b (ρ cos ϕ, ρ sin ϕ) dρ,
0
after solving the inner integration, we can obtain (18).
(39)
10
P ROOF
OF
−1
A PPENDIX C
T HEOREM 5 AND T HEOREM 7
The proof of (19), (20) and (25) are similar. We take (19)
as an example. For the user served by an MBS, SINR can be
expressed as
−α
Pm hm, rm
,
(40)
I + σ
P
−α
and IM =
Pm hm,i rm,i
, Is =
SINR =
where I = IM + Is
i∈m
P
−α
Ps hs,i rs,i
are the interference from the MBS tier and SBS
i∈s
tier.
So the coverage probability when user associated with an
MBS in non-cooperative model is
variable substitution µα = (sPi ) rα . ΦIi is the set of all the
interference BSs in tier i. And the interference is expressed as
the integration from d to ∞. When i ∈ m, that is in MBS tier,
interference is outside the coverage area of the user’s serving
MBS which is the circle of radius r. So we set d = r. As our
discussion is limited in the event of Am , we have the condition
/α
rs > (Ps rα /Pm ) . In which, rs also means the distance of
1/α
nearest interference SBS. So i ∈ s, d = rs = (Ps rα /Pm )
.
xP
s,k
−α
−α
rs,j > Pm rm /Ps ,
Similarly for Pn (Bm ), when i ∈ s,
xs,j ∈C
to obtain the region of rs,1 we have to get the approximation
1/α
−α
−α
.
rs,1
> Pm rm
/Ps . So d ≈ PPms
R EFERENCES
=
=
(a)
=
=
=
Pn (Am )
P (SINR > θ)
Z
P [SINR > θ | r] fRm (r) dr
Zr>
−1 α
P hm,1 > Pm
θrm I + σ 2 | r fRm (r) dr
Zr> h
i
2
−1
α
E e(−Pm θrm (I+σ )) fRm (r) dr
Zr> Ih
i
−1
α 2
−1 α
θrm fRm (r) dr,
E e(−Pm θrm σ ) LI Pm
r>
(41)
where fRm (r) can be seen in Lemma 3. (a) is because that
hi,j ∼ exp(1). LI (s) is Laplace transform of interference I,
it can be written as
LI (s)
=
=
=
(b)
=
EI e−sI
Y
Y
−α
E e−sPi hi,j ri,j
i∈{s,m}
ΦI
i∈{s,m}
ΦI
i
Y
Y
−α
E Ehi,j e−sPi hi,j ri,j
i
Y
Y
E
i∈{s,m}
(c)
=
ΦIi
R
1
−α
1 + sPi ri,j
1− 1+sP1 r−α dr
−λi
−2πλi
−2πλi (sPi ) α
Y
e
Y
e
R2
i
i∈{s,m}
(d)
=
R ∞
1−
d
1
1+sPi r−α
rdr
i∈{s,m}
(e)
=
Y
e
2
R
∞
(sPi )
µ
1+µα
−1
αd
dµ
,
i∈{s,m}
(42)
where (b) uses the expression for moment generating function
of an exponential random variable, which is hi,j ; (c) is due
to the probability generating functional for a PPP; (d) uses
the translation of surface integration. (e) is because of the
[1] Y. Zhang, M. Chen, S. Mao, L. Hu, and V. Leung, “Cap: community
activity prediction based on big data analysis,” IEEE Network, vol. 28,
no. 28, pp. 52–57, 2014.
[2] P. Popovski, V. Braun, G. Mange, P. Fertl, D. Gozalvez-Serrano,
N. Bayer, H. Droste, A. Roos, G. Zimmermann, M. Fallgren et al.,
“Ic t-317669-metis/d6. 2 initial report on horizontal topics, first results
and 5g system concept,” EU-Project METIS (ICT-317669), 2014.
[3] X. Ge, H. Cheng, M. Guizani, and T. Han, “5g wireless backhaul
networks: challenges and research advances,” IEEE Network, vol. 28,
no. 6, pp. 6–11, 2014.
[4] M. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, M. Hassan, and A. Alamri, “Aiwac: Affective
interaction through wearable computing and cloud technology,” IEEE
Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2015.
[5] M. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and S. Mao, “Emc: Emotion-aware mobile
cloud computing in 5g,” IEEE Network, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 32–38, 2015.
[6] A. Damnjanovic, J. Montojo, Y. Wei, T. Ji, T. Luo, M. Vajapeyam,
T. Yoo, O. Song, and D. Malladi, “A survey on 3gpp heterogeneous
networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 10–21,
2011.
[7] H. ElSawy, E. Hossain, and D. I. Kim, “Hetnets with cognitive small
cells: user offloading and distributed channel access techniques,” IEEE
Communications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 28–36, 2013.
[8] J. G. Andrews, H. Claussen, M. Dohler, S. Rangan, and M. C. Reed,
“Femtocells: Past, present, and future,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas
in Communications, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 497–508, 2012.
[9] R. Razavi and H. Claussen, “Urban small cell deployments: Impact
on the network energy consumption,” in Wireless Communications and
Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW). IEEE, 2012, pp. 47–52.
[10] T. Han, Y. Yang, X. Ge, and G. Mao, “Mobile converged networks:
framework, optimization, and challenges,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 34–40, 2014.
[11] M. Chen, Y. Zhang, L. Hu, T. Taleb, and Z. Sheng, “Cloud-based
wireless network: Virtualized, reconfigurable, smart wireless network
to enable 5g technologies,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 20,
no. 6, pp. 1–9, 2015.
[12] D. Gesbert, S. Hanly, H. Huang, S. S. Shitz, O. Simeone, and W. Yu,
“Multi-cell mimo cooperative networks: A new look at interference,”
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 28, no. 9, pp.
1380–1408, 2010.
[13] O. Simeone, O. Somekh, H. V. Poor, and S. Shamai, “Local base station
cooperation via finite-capacity links for the uplink of linear cellular
networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 55, no. 1,
pp. 190–204, 2009.
[14] R. Irmer, H. Droste, P. Marsch, M. Grieger, G. Fettweis, S. Brueck, H.-P.
Mayer, L. Thiele, and V. Jungnickel, “Coordinated multipoint: Concepts,
performance, and field trial results,” IEEE Communications Magazine,
vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 102–111, 2011.
[15] V. Garcia, Y. Zhou, and J. Shi, “Coordinated multipoint transmission
in dense cellular networks with user-centric adaptive clustering,” IEEE
Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 4297–
4308, 2014.
[16] F. Baccelli and A. Giovanidis, “A stochastic geometry framework for
analyzing pairwise-cooperative cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions
on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 794–808, 2015.
11
[17] B. Nunes, M. Mendonca, X.-N. Nguyen, K. Obraczka, T. Turletti et al.,
“A survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future
of programmable networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials,
vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1617–1634, 2014.
[18] D. Kreutz, F. M. Ramos, P. Esteves Verissimo, C. Esteve Rothenberg,
S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig, “Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14–76,
2015.
[19] M. Arslan, K. Sundaresan, and S. Rangarajan, “Software-defined networking in cellular radio access networks: potential and challenges,”
IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 150–156, 2015.
[20] L. E. Li, Z. M. Mao, and J. Rexford, “Toward software-defined cellular
networks,” in European Workshop on Software Defined Networking
(EWSDN). IEEE, 2012, pp. 7–12.
[21] G. Nigam, P. Minero, and M. Haenggi, “Coordinated multipoint joint
transmission in heterogeneous networks,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 4134–4146, 2014.
[22] H.-S. Jo, Y. J. Sang, P. Xia, and J. G. Andrews, “Heterogeneous cellular
networks with flexible cell association: A comprehensive downlink sinr
analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 11,
no. 10, pp. 3484–3495, 2012.
[23] X. Ge, B. Yang, J. Ye, and G. Mao, “Spatial spectrum and energy
efficiency of random cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1019–1030, 2015.
[24] R. Tanbourgi, S. Singh, J. G. Andrews, and F. K. Jondral, “A tractable
model for noncoherent joint-transmission base station cooperation,”
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 9, pp.
4959–4973, 2014.
[25] ——, “Analysis of non-coherent joint-transmission cooperation in heterogeneous cellular networks,” in IEEE International Conference on
Communications (ICC). IEEE, 2014, pp. 5160–5165.
[26] D. Lee, H. Seo, B. Clerckx, E. Hardouin, D. Mazzarese, S. Nagata,
and K. Sayana, “Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception in
lte-advanced: deployment scenarios and operational challenges,” IEEE
Communications Magazine, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 148–155, 2012.
[27] X. Ge, S. Tu, T. Han, and Q. Li, “Energy efficiency of small cell backhaul networks based on gauss-markov mobile models,” IET Networks,
vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 158–167, 2015.
[28] X. Ge, J. Ye, Y. Yang, and Q. Li, “User mobility evaluation for 5g
small cell networks based on individual mobility model,” IEEE Journal
on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 528–541, 2016.
[29] X. Mi, Z. Tian, X. Xu, M. Zhao, and J. Wang, “No stack: A sdn-based
framework for future cellular networks,” in International Symposium on
Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC). IEEE, 2014,
pp. 497–502.
[30] D. Cao, S. Zhou, and Z. Niu, “Optimal combination of base station
densities for energy-efficient two-tier heterogeneous cellular networks,”
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 9, pp.
4350–4362, 2013.
[31] T. Q. Quek, W. C. Cheung, and M. Kountouris, “Energy efficiency
analysis of two-tier heterogeneous networks,” in Wireless Conference
2011-Sustainable Wireless Technologies (European Wireless). VDE,
2011, pp. 1–5.
[32] X. Ge, S. Tu, G. Mao, and C. X. Wang, “5g ultra-dense cellular
networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 72–79,
2016.
[33] P. Qiao, Y. Zhong, and W. Zhang, “Base station cooperation for energy
efficiency: A gauss-poisson process approach,” in Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA).
IEEE, 2013, pp. 1–7.
[34] W. Nie, X. Wang, F.-C. Zheng, and W. Zhang, “Energy-efficient base
station cooperation in downlink heterogeneous cellular networks,” in
IEEE Globecom. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1779–1784.
[35] L. Saker, S. E. Elayoubi, T. Chahed, and A. Gati, “Energy efficiency
and capacity of heterogeneous network deployment in lte-advanced,”
in European 18th European Wireless Conference Wireless (EW 2012).
VDE, 2012, pp. 1–7.
[36] Y. Sun, Y. Chang, S. Song, and D. Yang, “An energy-efficiency aware
sleeping strategy for dense multi-tier hetnets,” in IEEE Globecom
Workshops. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1180–1185.
[37] D. Lopez-Perez, X. Chu, and . Guvenc, “On the expanded region of
picocells in heterogeneous networks,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics
in Signal Processing, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 281–294, 2012.
[38] A. K. Gupta, H. S. Dhillon, S. Vishwanath, and J. G. Andrews, “Downlink multi-antenna heterogeneous cellular network with load balancing,”
IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 4052–4067,
2014.
[39] S. Singh and J. G. Andrews, “Joint resource partitioning and offloading
in heterogeneous cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless
Communications, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 888–901, 2014.
[40] Q. Liu, G. Feng, and S. Qin, “Energy-efficient traffic offloading in
macro-pico networks,” in Wireless and Optical Communication Conference (WOCC). IEEE, 2013, pp. 236–241.
[41] K. Son, S. Chong, and G. Veciana, “Dynamic association for load
balancing and interference avoidance in multi-cell networks,” IEEE
Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 3566–3576,
2009.
[42] Q. Ye, B. Rong, Y. Chen, M. Al-Shalash, C. Caramanis, and J. G.
Andrews, “User association for load balancing in heterogeneous cellular
networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12,
no. 6, pp. 2706–2716, 2013.
[43] H. Kim, G. De Veciana, X. Yang, and M. Venkatachalam, “Alphaoptimal user association and cell load balancing in wireless networks,”
in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM. IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–5.
[44] L. Liu, X. Chen, M. Bennis, G. Xue, and Z. Han, “A distributed admm
approach for mobile data offloading in software defined network,” in
IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).
IEEE, 2015, pp. 1748–1752.
[45] Z. Arslan, M. Erel, Y. Ozcevik, and B. Canberk, “Sdoff: A softwaredefined offloading controller for heterogeneous networks,” in IEEE
Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE,
2014, pp. 2827–2832.
[46] Y. Li and M. Chen, “Software-defined network function virtualization:
A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 2542–2553, 2015.
[47] M. Chen, Y. Qian, S. Mao, W. Tang, and X. Yang, “Software-defined
mobile networks security,” Mobile Networks and Applications, pp. 1–15,
2015.
[48] Y. Li, F. Zheng, M. Chen, and D. Jin, “A unified control and optimization
framework for dynamical service chaining in software-defined nfv
system,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 15–23,
2015.
[49] V. Baumstark and G. Last, “Some distributional results for poissonvoronoi tessellations,” Advances in applied probability, pp. 16–40, 2007.
[50] G. Auer, V. Giannini, C. Desset, I. Godor, P. Skillermark, M. Olsson,
M. A. Imran, D. Sabella, M. J. Gonzalez, O. Blume et al., “How
much energy is needed to run a wireless network?” IEEE Wireless
Communications, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 40–49, 2011.
[51] A. H. Sakr and E. Hossain, “Location-aware cross-tier coordinated multipoint transmission in two-tier cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions
on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 6311–6325, 2014.
[52] H. S. Dhillon, R. K. Ganti, F. Baccelli, and J. G. Andrews, “Modeling
and analysis of k-tier downlink heterogeneous cellular networks,” IEEE
Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 550–
560, 2012.
Tao Han (M’13) received the Ph.D. degree in
information and communication engineering from
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
(HUST), Wuhan, China, in 2001.
He is currently an Associate Professor with the
School of Electronic Information and Communications, HUST. From 2010 to 2011, he was a Visiting
Scholar with the University of Florida, Gainesville,
FL, USA, as a Courtesy Associate Professor. He
has published more than 50 papers in international
conferences and journals. His research interests include wireless communications, multimedia communications, and computer
networks.
He is currently serving as an Area Editor for the European Alliance
Innovation Endorsed Transactions on Cognitive Communications.
12
Yujie Han received the Bachelor’s degree in communication and information system from Huazhong
University of Science and Technology, Wuhan,
China, in 2012, where he is currently working toward the Master’s degree.
His research interests include cooperative communication, stochastic geometry, and heterogeneous
networks.
Jing Zhang (M’13) received the M.S. and Ph.D.
degrees in electronics and information engineering
from Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China, in 2002 and 2010,
respectively.
He is currently an Associate Professor with
HUST. He has done research in the areas of multipleinput multiple-output, CoMP, beamforming, and
next-generation mobile communications. His current
research interests include cellular systems, green
communications, channel estimation, and system
performance analysis.
Xiaohu Ge (M’09-SM’11) is currently a full Professor with the School of Electronic Information and
Communications at Huazhong University of Science
and Technology (HUST), China. He is an adjunct
professor with the Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology at University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Australia. He received his PhD degree in
Communication and Information Engineering from
HUST in 2003. He has worked at HUST since Nov.
2005. Prior to that, he worked as a researcher at
Ajou University (Korea) and Politecnico Di Torino
(Italy) from Jan. 2004 to Oct. 2005. His research interests are in the area
of mobile communications, traffic modeling in wireless networks, green
communications, and interference modeling in wireless communications. He
has published more than 100 papers in refereed journals and conference
proceedings and has been granted about 15 patents in China. He received
the Best Paper Awards from IEEE Globecom 2010.
Dr. Ge is a Senior Member of the China Institute of Communications
and a member of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the
Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology Peer Review College. He has
been actively involved in organizing more the ten international conferences
since 2005. He served as the general Chair for the 2015 IEEE International
Conference on Green Computing and Communications (IEEE GreenCom
2015). He serves as an Associate Editor for the IEEE ACCESS, Wireless
Communications and Mobile Computing Journal (Wiley) and the International
Journal of Communication Systems (Wiley), etc. Moreover, he served as the
guest editor for IEEE Communications Magazine Special Issue on 5G Wireless
Communication Systems.
Qiang Li (M’16) received the B.Eng. degree in
communication engineering from the University
of Electronic Science and Technology of China
(UESTC), Chengdu, China, in 2007 and the Ph.D.
degree in electrical and electronic engineering from
Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, in 2011.
From 2011 to 2013, he was a Research Fellow with Nanyang Technological University. Since
2013, he has been an Associate Professor with
Huazhong University of Science and Technology,
Wuhan, China. He was a visiting scholar at the University of Sheffield,
Sheffield, UK from March to June 2015. His current research interests include
future broadband wireless networks, software-defined networking, cooperative
communications, and cognitive spectrum sharing.
Zhiquan Bai (M’08) received the M.Eng. degree
in communication and information systems from
Shandong University, Jinan, China, in 2003, and the
Ph.D. degree in communication engineering with
honor from INHA University in 2007, under the
Grant of Korean Government IT Scholarship, Incheon, Korea.
From 2007 to 2008, he was a postdoctor with
UWB Wireless Communications Research Center,
INHA University, Incheon, Korea. Since 2007, he
has been an associate professor with the School of
Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, China. He has
published more than 70 papers in international conferences and journals. His
current research interests include cooperative communications and MIMO
system, ultra wideband communications, cognitive radio system, and beyondfourth generation wireless communications.
Dr. Bai is the associate editor of the Introduction Journal of Communication Systems. He served as a TPC member and a session chair for some
international conferences.
Lijun Wang (M’16) received the B.S. degree in
telecommunication engineering from Xidian University, Xi’an, China in July, 2004 and the M.S. degree in communication and information system from
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
(HUST), Wuhan, China in June, 2008. From Sept.,
2016 she will work toward the Ph.D. degree with
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
She is currently an associate professor with the
Department of Information Science and Technology,
Wenhua College, Wuhan, China. Her research interests include wireless communications, and multimedia communications.
| 7cs.IT
|
Autocatalysis in Reaction Networks.
arXiv:1309.3957v4 [math.DS] 6 Aug 2014
Abhishek Deshpande∗1 and Manoj Gopalkrishnan†2
1
Center for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics, International
Institute of Information Technology, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India.
2
School of Technology and Computer Science, Tata Institute of Fundamental
Research, Mumbai, India.
6 August 2014
Abstract
The persistence conjecture is a long-standing open problem in chemical reaction
network theory. It concerns the behavior of solutions to coupled ODE systems that
arise from applying mass-action kinetics to a network of chemical reactions. The idea
is that if all reactions are reversible in a weak sense, then no species can go extinct.
A notion that has been found useful in thinking about persistence is that of “critical
siphon.” We explore the combinatorics of critical siphons, with a view towards the
persistence conjecture. We introduce the notions of “drainable” and “self-replicable”
(or autocatalytic) siphons. We show that: every minimal critical siphon is either drainable or self-replicable; reaction networks without drainable siphons are persistent; and
non-autocatalytic weakly-reversible networks are persistent. Our results clarify that
the difficulties in proving the persistence conjecture are essentially due to competition
between drainable and self-replicable siphons.
1
Introduction
Following [18, Example 6.3], consider the reaction network in the species X and Y with the
reactions
k
k
1
−
*
Y −
)
−
− 2X,
3
−
*
2Y −
)
−
−X
k2
∗
†
k4
[email protected]
[email protected]
1
Let x(t), y(t) represent concentrations at time t of the species X, Y respectively. Then
mass-action kinetics is described by the system of ordinary differential equations
ẋ
2
−2
1
−1
2
2
=
k1 y(t) +
k2 x(t) +
k3 y(t) +
k4 x(t)
−2
2
ẏ
−1
1
Does there exists a trajectory (x(t), y(t)) originating in the positive orthant (i.e., (x(0), y(0)) ∈
R2>0 ) that can get arbitrarily close to the boundary ∂R2≥0 = R2≥0 \ R2>0 as time t → ∞?
That is, for each > 0, does there exist a time t such that the distance of (x(t ), y(t )) from
∂R2≥0 is less than ? The persistence conjecture [12] asserts that so long as the reaction
network is weakly-reversible (Definition 2.9), this can not happen. This conjecture has a
history going back to 1974 [28]. It remains open, even when all reactions are reversible,
even for as few as 3 species! The 2 species case was settled only very recently [8, 39].
The notion of critical siphon [5] provides a powerful and easy combinatorial way of
proving persistence for a certain subclass of networks. The idea is that the existence of a
trajectory violating persistence has certain combinatorial implications, i.e., the existence of
critical siphons. Conversely, the absence of critical siphons — which can be combinatorially
checked — has dynamical implications, i.e., persistence.
For example, consider the following network in the species X and Y with reactions given
by
0
X +Y
2X + Y
X + 2Y
3X + 4Y
This is persistent. The idea is that if X were ever at zero concentration, it would be
produced from nothing, and similarly for Y . Only the first reaction 0
X + Y matters for
this analysis. The other reactions can be replaced arbitrarily, and so long as they remain
reversible, we can prove persistence. The notion of siphon helps to make this idea into
a proof. A siphon is a set of species that, once absent, remain absent. It turns out that
reaction networks without siphons are persistent.
Another example is X
Y . Here if X and Y are both absent, they remain absent,
so {X, Y } is a siphon. However, there is a conservation law: x(t) + y(t) is time-invariant,
because whenever an X is destroyed, a Y is created, and vice versa. Therefore, if the initial
conditions are (x(0), y(0)) ∈ R2>0 then the point (0, 0) where both X and Y are absent
is unreachable. The idea is that if there is a positive conservation law whose support is
contained in a siphon then that siphon can not be drained. Hence, among siphons, the
challenge to persistence comes only from critical siphons, i.e., siphons that do not contain
the support of a positive conservation law. The example with reactions Y
2X and
2Y
X has the critical siphon {X, Y }. So, though it is persistent, showing this requires a
different argument that proceeds by exhibiting a Lyapunov function [8, 20].
A different approach to the persistence conjecture is to try to identify a subclass of
weakly-reversible systems which are somehow physical, and exploit this extra structure to
obtain a proof for the persistence conjecture. This program was initiated in [1] and [17],
2
where the notion of systems where every species is made up of atoms in a unique way was
made precise, and it was shown that atomic systems have no critical siphons, and hence are
persistent. Later, in [18], this result was extended to all saturated or non-catalytic systems,
a larger class of systems properly containing the atomic systems.
The biological motivation for our work comes from Synthetic Biology, specifically from
the DNA Molecular Programming community [41, 53, 52], where reaction networks are being
viewed as programming languages for the synthesis of desired behaviour. One would like to
have a programming language that is natural with respect to chemical reaction dynamics, so
that there are meaningful ways to separately test, and then compose, different subsystems.
The Petri net view of reaction networks makes a connection with process algebras, and
connects to work on concurrent programming languages. Our work may be viewed as
setting down a mathematical bridge between these two different areas, by making explicit
the combinatorial foundations of reaction network notions like catalysis, self-replication,
and persistence. We hope to exploit these connections more in future to describe ways of
programming chemical reaction networks that will take advantage of advances in concurrent
programming language design.
Our contributions in this paper are the following:
• We give an explicit combinatorial characterization of the minimal critical siphons.
Specifically, we introduce the notions of drainable and self-replicable sets in Definition 3.1, and prove in Theorem 5.3 that every minimal critical siphon is either
drainable or self-replicable.
• Conjecture 1 from [18] asserted a link between a certain notion of autocatalysis and
critical siphons. We provide a counterexample (Example 3.8) to this conjecture. Our
notion of self-replicable siphons captures a more nuanced notion of autocatalysis. With
this notion, we show in the spirit of [18, Conjecture 1] that the weakly-reversible
networks that have critical siphons are precisely the autocatalytic systems (Theorem 5.3). In particular, all non-autocatalytic (i.e., without self-replicable siphons)
weakly-reversible networks are persistent. As a special case, in Section 7 we obtain a
combinatorial proof for the persistence of non-catalytic networks, the main result in
[18] which was originally proved using algebraic geometric methods.
• Angeli et al. [5] have shown that conservative reaction networks without critical siphons
are persistent. We show that reaction networks without drainable siphons are persistent (Theorem 6.2). Since networks with drainable siphons are a proper subclass of
networks with critical siphons (Theorem 5.3), our result sharpens Angeli’s result, and
brings out that the obstruction to proving the persistence conjecture comes from a competition between the drainable and self-replicable natures of a siphon (Remark 6.4).
• In Section 4, towards proving Theorem 5.3, we prove the Convex Rank-Nullity theorem
(Theorem 4.9), a trichotomy result for matrices that have a sign pattern with all
diagonal terms are negative, and all off-diagonal terms positive. Though this result is
very suggestive of Farkas’ lemma and its variants, to our best knowledge it has neither
3
appeared before, nor is it an immediate corollary of Farkas’ lemma (Remark 4.10).
• All our results are in the setting of positive reaction networks (Definition 2.3). This
means our results hold for reactions like 0.3X + 2.14Y → 1.1Z with fractional stoichiometric coefficients.
• We introduce the notion of a critical set (Definition 3.1), so that a critical siphon
is a set of species which is both critical and a siphon. Together with the notion
of critical point (Definition 3.6), this decoupling of the two notions simplifies the
analysis (Theorem 3.7), and allows us to obtain slightly stronger results (Theorem 5.3).
Figure 1 provides a summary of all the results at a glance.
2
Preliminaries
Notation 2.1. Let z, z 0 ∈ Rn be two vectors.
1. min(z, z 0 ) is the vector whose i’th coordinate is min(zi , zi0 ) for all i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n}.
2. dze is the vector whose i’th coordinate is dzi e for all i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n}.
3. supp(z) := {i | zi 6= 0}.
Definition 2.2. For all vectors v1 , v2 , . . . , vk ∈ Rn :
1. The convex polyhedral cone Cone{v1 , v2 , . . . , vk } :=
( k
X
)
ai vi | a1 , a2 , . . . , ak ≥ 0 .
i=1
2. Span{v1 , v2 , . . . , vk } :=
( k
X
)
ai vi | a1 , a2 , . . . , ak ∈ R .
i=1
Definition 2.3 (Reaction Network). For every finite set S:
1. An S-complex is a vector y ∈ RS .
2. A complex y ∈ RS is
(a) Positive iff y ∈ RS≥0 .
(b) Integer iff y ∈ ZS .
(c) Chemical iff y ∈ NS .
3. A reaction is a pair (y, y 0 ) of complexes, written y → y 0 with reactant y and product
y0.
4. A reaction y → y 0 is positive (respectively, integer, chemical) iff both y, y 0 are positive
(respectively, integer, chemical).
4
Figure 1: Summary of results.
Self-replicable
Siphon
Corollary 6.11
Positive
Strictly
Catalytic set
Theorem 6.6
Chemical
Weakly-reversible
Strictly
Catalytic
network
Positive
Cons, Positive
C
Cons, Positive
Theorem 5.3.3
OR
Cons : Consistent
OR
B
Definition
A
Positive Theorem 5.3.2
Theorem 5.3.3
Cons, Positive
Drainable
Siphon
By result X, if the network is Y
then A implies B or C.
Minimal
Critical Siphon
Theorem 5.3.3
Positive
Theorem 5.6
Network
is not
persistent
Catalytic
Network
Critical Siphon
A reaction network is a pair (S, R) where S is a finite set denoting reacting species, and R
is a finite set of reactions. The reaction graph of the reaction network (S, R) is the directed
graph with vertex set C := {y, y 0 | y → y 0 ∈ R} and edge set R.
Remark 2.4. Conventionally, a reaction network is defined as a triple (S, C, R) where C
is the set of complexes that occur either as reactants or as products in some reaction in
5
R. Explicitly providing the set C is redundant, because the complexes can be recovered
from the set of reactions. Therefore, we have found it more economical to depart from
convention, and define a reaction network as a two-tuple of species and reactions.
Notation 2.5. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network. A reaction y → y 0 is a G-reaction
iff y → y 0 ∈ R.
Definition 2.6. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network. Then
1. The stoichiometric subspace H ⊆ RS of G is the linear span of the reaction vectors
{y 0 − y | y → y 0 ∈ R}.
P
2. A G-conservation law is a linear polynomial i∈S wi xi = w · x, where the xi ’s are
indeterminates, and w ∈ RS is perpendicular to H.
3. A G-conservation law w.x is positive iff w ∈ RS≥0 \ {0}.
Remark 2.7. It is well-known and easily verified that G-conservation laws
P are invariant
0 is a G-reaction and
to the application of G-reactions.
That
is,
if
y
→
y
i wi xi is a GP
P
wi (xi + θ(yi0 P
− yi )) for all θ ∈ R. Indeed, this is
conservation law then i∈S wi xi = i∈SP
but a special case of the observation that i∈S wi xi = i∈S wi (xi + θ vi )for all vectors v in
the stoichiometric subspace H of G.
Definition 2.8. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network. Then the stoichiometric matrix
Γ of G is the matrix whose rows are the reaction vectors {y 0 − y | y → y 0 ∈ R}. For all
T ⊆ S, the stoichiometric submatrix ΓT is the matrix obtained from Γ by keeping only
those columns that correspond to species in T .
Definition 2.9. A reaction network G is:
1. Positive (respectively integer, chemical) if each G-reaction is positive (respectively
integer, chemical).
2. Reversible if the reaction graph is undirected.
3. Weakly-reversible if in the reaction graph, every reaction belongs to a cycle.
4. Consistent if there exists a strictly positive vector v such that v · Γ = 0
Remark 2.10. The notion of consistent is well-known from the Petri net literature [54].
It is also well-known [5] that every weakly-reversible reaction network is consistent. For a
reaction network consisting of a single cycle, this is obvious by taking v to be the vector of
all 1’s. Since a weakly-reversible network can be expressed as a combination of cycles, the
result follows for an arbitrary weakly-reversible network.
6
Example 2.11. 2X+3Y is a complex, represented by the vector (2, 3) in the space R{X,Y } ∼
=
R2 of complexes. It is a positive complex because 2, 3 ≥ 0. It is an integer complex because
2, 3 are integers. Finally, it is a chemical complex because 2, 3 are positive integers.
The reactions X → 2Y and 2X → Y are chemical reactions, where the reaction notation
is understood as shorthand to represent the pairs of vectors ((1, 0), (0, 2)) and ((2, 0), (0, 1)).
The corresponding reaction network is G = ({X, Y }, {X → 2Y, 2X → Y }).
Definition 2.12. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network. For all reactions y → y 0 and
positive complexes w ∈ RS≥0 , the dilution of y → y 0 by w is the reaction y + w → y 0 + w. A
reaction z → z 0 is a G-dilution iff there exist a positive complex w ∈ RS≥0 and a G-reaction
y → y 0 such that z → z 0 is the dilution of y → y 0 by w.
Dilutions of reactions have been defined by Cardelli [6].
Notation 2.13. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network, and let y, y 0 ∈ RS be complexes. One says that there is a G-reaction pathway y →∗G y 0 iff there exists a sequence
y = y(0) → y(1) → . . . → y(k) = y 0 of G-dilutions.
Clearly, G-dilutions need not be G-reactions. Such dilutions describe the effect of applying a G-reaction y → y 0 to a population y + w that contains all the reactants required
for the reaction to fire, to obtain the population y 0 + w.
A G-reaction pathway corresponds to the idea of reachability: given a population z
in a test-tube, and a reaction network, what other populations are reachable by applying
G-reactions? The reachable populations are precisely the populations z 0 such that z →∗G z 0 .
This notion of reachability has been considered by other authors [46, 7, 6].
Lemma 2.14. Let G be a reaction network, and let z →∗G z 0 be a G-reaction pathway.
Then z 0 − z is in the positive span H+ = cone{y 0 − y | y → y 0 ∈ R} of the reactions
of G. In particular, for every θ ∈ R, for every G-reaction pathway y →∗G y 0 , we have
w · (x + θ(y 0 − y)) = w · x for every w perpendicular to the stoichiometric subspace H.
Proof. To see that z 0 − z ∈ H+ , first note that for G-dilutions x → x0 we have x0 − x ∈ H.
Since reaction pathways are formed by a chain z = y(0) → y(1) → y(2) . . . → y(k) = z 0 of
dilutions, we have z 0 −z = y(k)−y(0) = y(k)−y(k −1)+y(k −1)−y(k −2)+· · ·+y(1)−y(0),
which is in H+ . The invariance of w · x along z →∗G z 0 now follows from Remark 2.7.
Example 2.15. Let G = ({X, Y }, {X → 2Y, 2Y → X, 2X → Y, Y → 2X}). Then the
reaction 2X → X + 2Y is not a G-reaction. However, it is a dilution by X of the G-reaction
X → 2Y . The sequence of G-dilutions
2X → X + 2Y → 3X + Y → 5X
where the second and third reactions are dilutions of Y → 2X, yields a reaction pathway
2X →∗G 5X.
7
Definition 2.16. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network. The opposite reaction network
Gop of G is the reaction network with species S and reactions {y 0 → y | y → y 0 ∈ R}
obtained by reversing the reactions of G.
3
Siphons, Drainability, Self-replicability
We will say that a set of species is self-replicable if there is an initial state, and a reaction
pathway from that state that will increase the numbers of each species in the set. In
ecological terms, this would capture the potential for a set of species to simultaneously
prosper and increase in number. The opposite notion is that of drainable sets of species,
where from an initial state a reaction pathway can deplete the numbers of each species. In
ecological terms, this notion captures the potential for a set of species to simultaneously
decrease in number, and is connected to the threat of extinction or non-persistence. We
now define these notions more formally.
Definition 3.1. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network. A set T ⊆ S of species is
1. A siphon iff for every reaction y → y 0 ∈ R, if the complex y 0 contains a species from
T then the complex y contains a species from T .
2. Critical iff there is no positive conservation law whose support is contained in T .
3. Self-replicable iff there is a reaction pathway y →∗G y 0 such that for every species i ∈ T ,
the i’th component (y 0 − y)i is strictly positive.
4. Drainable iff T is self-replicable for Gop , i.e., there is a reaction pathway y →∗G y 0 such
that for every species i ∈ T , the i’th component (y 0 − y)i is strictly negative.
5. Closed iff for every reaction y → y 0 ∈ R, if supp y ⊆ T then supp y 0 ⊆ T . The closure
Cl(T ) is the smallest closed set containing T .
Remark 3.4.2 will show that the intersection of closed sets is closed, and hence the
closure is unique.
Notation 3.2. As is usual, one calls a set maximal (respectively, minimal) among all
nonempty sets having a property P if no set having property P properly contains it (is
properly contained in it). In this sense, we shall refer to maximal and minimal siphons,
critical siphons, self-replicable sets, and drainable sets. In particular, note that a minimal
critical siphon is minimal among all critical siphons, but not necessarily minimal among all
critical sets. Also see Remark 3.4.5.
Siphons and critical siphons have been defined before in the chemical reaction network
literature [5]. Though “siphon” appears to be the more conventional term, such sets have
also been called semi-locking sets. We find this to be a better description of their nature.
8
They don’t necessarily siphon off any flow; however, if all the siphon species are absent, then
they remain absent. Critical siphons have also been referred to as “relevant siphons.” [44]
The notion of “closure” with respect to a set of reactions of a starting “food” set of
species has been considered before in the literature of autocatalytic sets [24]. Gnacadja [17]
has considered the notions of “reach-closure” of a set. Our notion of closed sets is cognate
with both these notions.
Example 3.3. Consider the reaction network G with reactions
X
2Y, 2X
Y
from Example 2.15. The set {X, Y } is:
1. A siphon, because every reaction with either X or Y on the product side requires
either X or Y on the reactant side. The set {X} is not a siphon, because of the
G-reaction Y → 2X.
2. Critical because there are no conservation laws.
3. Self-replicable because there is a G-reaction pathway
2X + 2Y →∗G 3X + 3Y = 2X + 2Y → X + 4Y → 3X + 3Y
increasing both the number of X and number of Y .
4. Drainable because there is a G-reaction pathway
3X + 3Y →∗G 2X + 2Y = 3X + 3Y → X + 4Y → 2X + 2Y
decreasing both the number of X and the number of Y .
5. Closed. In particular, the set of all species is trivially always closed. The set {X} is
not closed, because the G-reaction X → 2Y produces the species Y which was not in
the set.
The next remark collects some easy observations about these definitions.
Remark 3.4. For every reaction network:
1. As shown in [17, Proposition 3.4], a set T is a siphon iff its complement S \ T is closed.
To see this, observe that
S \ T is not closed
⇔ There exists a reaction y → y 0 such that the complex y does not contain any species
from T , while the complex y 0 contains a species from T .
⇔ T is not a siphon.
9
2. The union of siphons is a siphon. The intersection of closed sets is closed. In particular,
this is why the definition of closure of a set is well-defined.
3. The intersection of siphons need not be a siphon. Consider the following reactions:
{X + Y → Y , X + Z → Y }. In this example, the sets {X, Y } and {Y, Z} are both
siphons, but their intersection {Y } is not a siphon. For the same reason, the union of
closed sets need not be closed.
4. Every subset of a critical set is critical. If not, suppose T 0 is a non-critical subset of T .
Then there exists a positive conservation law w.x with supp w ⊆ T 0 ⊆ T , contradicting
T being critical.
5. As a consequence, every minimal critical siphon is also minimal among siphons.
6. Every subset P of a self-replicable set T is self-replicable since if y →∗G y 0 is such that
the i’th component yi0 − yi > 0 for all i ∈ T then a fortiori yi0 − yi > 0 for all i ∈ P .
7. Similarly, every subset of a drainable set is drainable.
8. The union of critical sets need not be critical. Consider the reaction X → Y . In this
reaction the sets {X} and {Y } are both critical, but their union {X, Y } is not critical
because of the positive conservation law x + y.
9. The union of self-replicable sets/ drainable sets need not be self-replicable/ drainable.
Consider the following reactions : {2X → Y , 2Y → X}. In this example, the sets {X}
and {Y } are self-replicable, but their union {X, Y } is not self-replicable. Reversing all
reaction arrows gives an example where the union of drainable sets is not drainable.
Lemma 3.5. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network. A set T ⊆ S of species is a siphon iff
for every reaction pathway y →∗G y 0 , if the complex y 0 contains a species from T then the
complex y contains a species from T .
Proof. (⇐:) Since every reaction is a reaction pathway.
(⇒:) Suppose T is a siphon. Then by definition, for every reaction y → y 0 ∈ R, if the
complex y 0 contains a species from T then the complex y contains a species from T . In
particular, this is true for every dilution y + w → y 0 + w of y → y 0 , where w ∈ RS≥0 .
Therefore, it must be true for chains of dilutions, i.e., reaction pathways.
Definition 3.6 (Critical point). Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network with stoichiometric
subspace H = span{y 0 − y | y → y 0 ∈ R}. A point z ∈ RS≥0 is a critical point iff the affine
space z + H meets the positive orthant RS>0 .
Note that a critical point is a point whose support is stoichiometrically admissible in
the language of [17]. Critical points are a generalization of critical siphon-points defined in
10
[18]. Firstly, we do not require the reaction network to be weakly-reversible. Further, we
do not require the point z to be an equilibrium point, nor do we require the set {i | zi = 0}
to be a siphon.
Theorem 3.7. Let G = (S, R) be a reaction network. Let T ⊆ S. Then the following are
equivalent:
1. T is critical.
2. ker ΓT ∩ RT≥0 = {0}.
3. Every point z ∈ RS≥0 with {i | zi = 0} = T is a critical point.
4. There exists a critical point z ∈ RS≥0 with zi = 0 iff i ∈ T .
Proof. Let z ∈ RS≥0 be such that zi = 0 iff i ∈ T . Let H = span{y 0 − y | y → y 0 ∈ R} be
the stoichiometric subspace of G.
¬(2) ⇒ ¬(1). If 0 6= v ∈ ker ΓT ∩ RT≥0 then v · x is a positive conservation law with support
in T , and T is not critical.
(2) ⇒ (3). From the Transposition theorem of Gordan [43, (31), pp. 95] applied to ΓT ,
there exists v ∈ RR such that vΓT > 0. Note that vΓ is in the stoichiometric subspace H
of G. Consider w := z + vΓ where > 0 is to be chosen sufficiently small. It is enough to
show that there exists > 0 so that w ∈ RS>0 . We show this by case analysis.
Case 1: i ∈ T . Since zi = 0, we have wi = (vΓ)i > 0.
zi
Case 2: i ∈
/ T . Then zi > 0 and so for < |(vΓ)
, we have wi = zi + (vΓ)i > 0.
i|
(3) ⇒ (4) is obvious.
¬(1) ⇒ ¬(4). Suppose T is not critical. Then there exists a positive conservation law w · x
such that supp w ⊆ T . In particular, w · (z + H) = w · z + w · H = w · z = 0. But w · x 6= 0
for all x ∈ RS>0 . We conclude that z + H does not meet RS>0 . Hence, z is not a critical
point.
Example 3.8. Consider the reaction network
X
2X, Y
X + Y.
The associated event-system [1] is EG = {x − x2 , y − xy}. The network is autocatalytic
as per [18, Definition 6.2] because x − x2 ∈ EG and for all k ∈ N the binomials 1 − xk
are not contained in the ideal (EG ). However, contrary to [18, Conjecture 1], there are no
critical siphons. The set {X} is not a siphon because X is produced by the second reaction.
Neither of the siphons {Y } and {X, Y } are critical siphons, since the concentration of Y is
dynamically invariant.
Example 3.8 motivated our definition of drainable and self-replicable sets. The key
observation was that the failure of [18, Conjecture 1] can be attributed to working with
only one species at a time. If we work with sets of species instead then, as we show in
Theorem 5.3, an appropriately modified version of [18, Conjecture 1] is true.
11
4
Diffusive Matrices
Definition 4.1. A matrix A = (aij )m×n is diffusive iff all diagonal elements are strictly
negative, and all off-diagonal elements are non-negative. That is, aii < 0 and aij ≥ 0 for all
i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , m} and j ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n} with i 6= j. A diffusive matrix is strongly diffusive iff
all off-diagonal elements are strictly positive.
Example 4.2. Laplacian matrices (or their negatives, depending upon convention) are
diffusive. If the graph is a clique then the Laplacian matrix is strongly diffusive. If the
graph is strongly connected then some power of the Laplacian matrix is strongly diffusive.
Notation 4.3. Let A be a matrix. Then rows(A) is the set of row vectors of A.
Lemma 4.4. Let A = (aij )n×n be a square matrix with aij > 0 for all i 6= j.
If cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn≥0 \ {0} is nonempty then cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn>0 is nonempty.
Proof. Suppose cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn≥0 \ {0} =
6 ∅. Let v ∈ cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn≥0 \ {0}, and let
i be such that vi > 0. Define
w() := v + (ai1 , ai2 , . . . , ain ).
Then for sufficiently small > 0, we claim that w() ∈ Rn>0 , which completes the proof
because w() ∈ cone(rows(A)). To see this, note first that vi > 0 ⇒ vi + aii = w()i > 0
for sufficiently small > 0. Next, for all j 6= i, we have w()j = vj + aij > 0 since aij > 0
by assumption.
Lemma 4.5. Let A be a diffusive square n × n matrix, and let −A1 be the matrix obtained
after one step of Gaussian elimination applied to −A. Then
1. cone(rows(A1 )) ⊆ cone(rows(A)), and
2. Either A1 is diffusive or rows(A1 ) ∩ Rn≥0 is nonempty.
Proof. (1) Recall that Gaussian elimination proceeds by either (a) exchanging rows, or (b)
multiplying a row by a scalar, or (c) adding a constant times one row to another row. We
consider each of these cases separately.
(a) Since A is diffusive, all elements on the diagonal of −A are strictly positive, in particular
non-zero. So the algorithm will not exchange rows.
(b) If a row is multiplied to make the pivot element equal 1, then it is multiplied by
the reciprocal of the diagonal element, which is a positive number, so cone(rows(A1 )) ⊆
cone(rows(A)).
a
>0
(c) If rowj ← rowj +c · rowi for some rows i, j then the algorithm will choose c = − aji
ii
12
so that
cone(rows(A1 )) = cone({row1 , row2 , . . . , rowj−1 , rowj +c · rowi , rowj+1 , . . . , rown })
⊆ cone{row1 , row2 , . . . , rown , rowj +c · rowi }
= cone{row1 , row2 , . . . , rown }
(Since c > 0)
= cone(rows(A)).
(2) Suppose A1 is not diffusive. Since scalar multiplication preserves diffusivity, A1 must
have been obtained from A by an operation rowj ← rowj +c rowi for some c > 0 and rows
i, j. Since A was diffusive and by the choice of c, this operation preserves non-negativity of
off-diagonal terms. By non-diffusivity of A1 , the diagonal entry on the j’th row of A1 must
be non-negative, so that the j’th row of A1 is in Rn≥0 .
Remark 4.6. The reason we are applying Gaussian elimination to −A instead of to A is
because Gaussian elimination as usually described in textbooks sets the pivot elements to
be positive, whereas diffusive matrices have negative elements on the diagonal. If one were
to either change the convention in the Gaussian elimination algorithm, or reverse the sign
convention for what is meant by a diffusive matrix, we wouldn’t need this negative sign.
Lemma 4.7. Let A be a strongly diffusive square matrix. Suppose Gaussian elimination
is applied to −A to obtain the sequence −A = −A0 , −A1 , −A2 , . . . , −Ak of matrices, and
suppose A1 , . . . , Ak−1 are diffusive and Ak is not. If rows(Ak ) ∩ Rn≥0 = {0} then Ak has the
sign pattern
< 0 ≥ 0 ... ≥ 0
0 < 0 ... ≥ 0
..
..
.
.
<0 ≥0
0
0
...
0
That is, if Ak = (akij )n×n then
≥ 0 if i > j
k
aij = 0 if i < j or i = n
< 0 if i = j 6= n
Proof. Since Ak−1 is diffusive, and Ak is not, then as in the proof of Lemma 4.5, Ak must
have been obtained from Ak−1 by an operation
rowkq := rowk−1
+c · rowk−1
q
p
13
where c > 0 and p, q ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n} are distinct rows. If Ak = (akij )n×n then
akqj
= 0 if j = p by choice of c in Gaussian elimination;
k−1
k−1
k−1
= aqj + capj
≥ 0 if j 6= q, j 6= p since ak−1
qj ≥ 0, apj ≥ 0 by diffusivity of Ak−1 ;
≥ 0 if j = q since Ak is not diffusive, and Ak−1 is.
Therefore rowkq ∈ Rn≥0 . By assumption, rowkq = 0.
Suppose for contradiction that q 6= n. Consider the n’th column. Note that a0in > 0
for all i 6= n since A0 = A is strongly diffusive. It follows by induction that for all i 6= n,
a1in , a2in , . . . , akin > 0. In particular, akqn > 0 contradicting rowkq = 0. Hence q = n.
The fact that Ak is upper-triangular is a consequence of Gaussian elimination reaching
the last row. The sign pattern follows because Ak−1 was diffusive.
Corollary 4.8. Let A be an (n − 1) × n strongly diffusive matrix.
If cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn≥0 = {0} then A has rank n − 1.
Proof. Observe that Gaussian elimination does not employ the n’th row of an n × n matrix
to put the (n − 1) × n submatrix obtained by dropping the n’th row into upper triangular
form.
Suppose cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn≥0 = {0}. Consider applying Gaussian elimination to A.
After each step, either the matrix remains diffusive, or a row becomes non-negative, by
Lemma 4.5. If we never get a non-negative row, Gaussian elimination goes all the way to
the end, and gives us a matrix in row echelon form, which clearly has rank n − 1. If we get a
non-negative row, by assumption the row must be 0. However, this contradicts Lemma 4.7,
and hence this case can never happen.
Theorem 4.9 (Convex Rank-Nullity Theorem). Let A be a strongly diffusive n × n matrix.
Then either ker A∩Rn≥0 6= {0} or cone(rows(A))∩Rn>0 is nonempty or Rn<0 ⊆ cone(rows(A)).
Proof. Suppose cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn>0 = ∅ and ker A ∩ Rn≥0 = {0}.
By Lemma 4.4 we must have cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn≥0 = {0}. Hence applying Corollary 4.8
to the first n − 1 rows of A, it follows that A has rank at least n − 1.
We next argue that A has rank n. Suppose for contradiction that A has rank n − 1. Let
v ∈ ker A be a non-zero vector. Since ker A ∩ Rn≥0 = {0}, we know that v ∈
/ Rn≥0 . Reordering
indices if necessary, we may assume without loss of generality that v has the sign pattern
(≥ 0, ≥ 0, . . . , ≥ 0, > 0, ≤ 0, ≤ 0, . . . , ≤ 0), with k such that vk > 0 and vk+1 ≤ 0. Now
applying Gaussian elimination to A with this ordering leads to an upper triangular matrix
B as in Lemma 4.7 with the last row 0. In particular, the k’th row rkB of this matrix has
the sign pattern (0, 0, . . . , 0, < 0, ≥ 0, . . . , ≥ 0) with the entry in position k having the only
negative sign. Since v ∈ ker A = ker B, we must have rkB · v = 0. But from the sign analysis,
rkB · v < 0, which is a contradiction. Hence, A has rank n.
14
The sequence of matrices produced by Gaussian elimination applied to A are all diffusive.
This is because cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn≥0 = {0} and A has rank n, so Lemma 4.5 applies
inductively. So the final matrix B output by Gaussian elimination is diagonal and diffusive.
That is:
<0 0
...
0
0 < 0 ...
0
B= .
..
..
.
<0 0
0
0
...
<0
By repeated application of Lemma 4.5, cone(rows(B)) ⊆ cone(rows(A)),
and so Rn<0 ⊆ cone(rows(A)).
Remark 4.10. Theorem 4.9 might remind some readers of Gordan’s theorem [43, (31),
pp. 95], which asserts unconditionally that either ker A ∩ Rn≥0 6= {0} or span(rows(A)) ∩ Rn>0
is nonempty. However, the two theorems are different, and it is instructive to compare the
differences.
Theorem 4.9 makes a stronger assumption — that A is strongly-diffusive — and produces
a stronger implication: if the kernel is trivial then the cone (as opposed to span in Gordan’s
theorem) of the rows meets either the positive or the negative orthant. In particular, there
are matrices that violate the stronger assumption for which the stronger conclusion is also
false. For example, consider the diffusive, but not strongly diffusive, matrix
−1 0
0
0 −1 2 .
0
1 −1
The conclusion of Theorem 4.9 is false for this matrix. This is because the kernel is zero.
The cone of the rows does not contain any strictly positive or strictly negative vector, as
can be easily verified.
5
The Main Result
Lemma 5.1. Let G = (S, R) be a positive reaction network. Let T ⊆ S be a minimal
siphon. Then for all i ∈ T , the closure Cl({i} ∪ S \ T ) = S.
Proof. Note that S \ T ( {i} ∪ S \ T ⊆ Cl({i} ∪ S \ T ). Therefore, the complement
S \ Cl({i} ∪ S \ T ) ( T . But S \ Cl({i} ∪ S \ T ) is the complement of a closed set, and
hence must be a siphon by Remark 3.4.1. Since T is a minimal siphon, a siphon properly
contained in T can only be the empty set. Hence, Cl({i} ∪ S \ T ) = S.
Lemma 5.2. Let G = (S, R) be a positive reaction network. Suppose T ⊆ S is a minimal
siphon that is not self-replicable. Then there exists a strongly diffusive T × T matrix A such
that cone(rows(A)) ⊆ cone(rows(ΓT )) and ker A = ker ΓT .
15
Proof. By Lemma 5.1, we have Cl({i} ∪ S \ T ) = S for every i ∈ T . Hence for every
i ∈ T , there exists a reaction pathway y(i) →∗G y 0 (i) such that supp(y(i)) = i ∪ S \ T and
supp(y 0 (i)) = S. Define the matrix A = (y 0 (i)j − y(i)j )T ×T .
To see that A is strongly diffusive, first note that y 0 (i)j − y(i)j > 0 for all i, j ∈ T such
that i 6= j since y(i)j = 0. Next note that if there exists i ∈ T such that y 0 (i)i − y(i)i ≥ 0,
then Lemma 4.4 implies that T is self-replicable. Hence y 0 (i)i − y(i)i < 0 for all i ∈ T .
Since the rows of A correspond to reaction pathways, Lemma 2.14 implies that
cone(rows(A)) ⊆ cone(rows(ΓT )).
It is clear that ker ΓT ⊆ ker A. Suppose the containment is strict. Then there exists
a row of ΓT that is not in the span of the rows of A. In particular A does not have full
rank, so by Corollary 4.8, A must have rank n − 1 and the first n − 1 rows of A are linearly
independent. Further, ΓT has a row that is not in the span of the rows of A. Adding
times this row of ΓT to the last row of A, where > 0 is sufficiently small, gives a new
matrix à that is full rank (hence ker ΓT = ker à = {0}), strongly-diffusive, and such that
cone(rows(Ã)) ⊆ cone(rows(ΓT )).
Theorem 5.3. Let G = (S, R) be a positive reaction network. Let ∅ =
6 T ⊆ S. Then
1. If T is either drainable or self-replicable then it is critical.
2. If T is a minimal critical siphon then it is either drainable or self-replicable.
3. If G is consistent then the following are equivalent:
(a) T is critical.
(b) T is drainable.
(c) T is self-replicable.
Proof. 1. For contradiction, suppose T is not critical. Then there exists a positive conservation law w.x with support in T . If T is self-replicable then there exists a reaction
pathway y →∗G y 0 such that yi0 − yi > 0 for all i ∈ T . In particular, w.y 0 > w.y, contradicting
Lemma 2.14 that w.x is invariant along G-reaction pathways. If T is drainable, we get a
similar contradiction from yi0 − yi < 0 for all i ∈ T . Hence, T is critical.
2. Let T be a minimal critical siphon. Since T is critical, by Theorem 3.7, we have
ker ΓT ∩ RT≥0 = {0}. Since T is a minimal siphon, Lemma 5.2 gives a strongly diffusive
matrix A such that cone(rows(A)) ⊆ cone(rows(ΓT )) and ker A = ker ΓT .
Applying Theorem 4.9 to the matrix A, either
cone(rows(ΓT )) ∩ Rn>0 ⊇ cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn>0 6= ∅
so that T is self-replicable, or
cone(rows(ΓT )) ∩ Rn<0 ⊇ cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn<0 6= ∅
16
so that T is drainable.
3. The implication (b) ⇒ (a) is true by part 1. Now suppose that G is consistent. We
will show (a) ⇒ (c) and (c) ⇒ (b).
Since G is consistent, for each reaction y → y 0 ∈ R there is a number ay→y0 > 0 such that
X
ay→y0 (y 0 − y) = 0.
(1)
ay→y0 (y 0 − y)i = 0.
(2)
y→y 0 ∈R
In particular, for all i ∈ T , we have
X
y→y 0 ∈R
Since RS>0 is an open set, we may assume the ay→y0 are rational numbers. Normalizing
denominators, we may assume the ay→y0 are integers.
(a) ⇒ (c): Suppose T is critical. We will show that T is self-replicable. Towards this,
let z ∈ ZS≥0 be such that zi = 0 precisely when i ∈ T . Then z is a critical point by
Theorem 3.7. From the definition of a critical point, there exist reals ey→y0 such that
z+
X
ey→y0 (y 0 − y) ∈ RS>0 .
(3)
y→y 0 ∈R
In particular, for all i ∈ T , since zi = 0, we have
X
ey→y0 (y 0 − y)i > 0.
(4)
y→y 0 ∈R
Since RS>0 is an open set, we may assume the ey→y0 are rational numbers. Normalizing
denominators, we may assume the ey→y0 are integers. Now choose strictly positive integers
fy→y0 such that fy→y0 ay→y0 + ey→y0 > 0. Let n = maxy→y0 {fy→y0 }. Adding n times
Equation 2 to Equation 4 yields for all i ∈ T :
X
n ay→y0 + ey→y0 (y 0 − y)i > 0.
y→y 0 ∈R
Hence T is self-replicable.
(c) ⇒ (b) Suppose T is self-replicable. Then there exist positive integers by→y0 such that
for all i ∈ T
X
by→y0 (y 0 − y)i > 0.
(5)
y→y 0 ∈R
17
We choose strictly positive integers cy→y0 such that cy→y0 ay→y0 − by→y0 > 0, and define
m := maxy→y0 {cy→y0 }. Subtracting Equation 5 from m times Equation 2 yields for all
i ∈ T:
X
m ay→y0 − by→y0 (y 0 − y)i < 0.
y→y 0 ∈R
Hence T is drainable.
Example 5.4. Some critical siphons are neither self-replicable nor drainable. Consider the
following network:
X → 2Y, 2X → Y
In this network, the siphon {X, Y } is critical. However, {X, Y } is neither self-replicable nor
drainable.
A self-replicable siphon need not be a minimal critical siphon. Consider the following
network:
X → 2X, 2X → 2X + Y
The siphon {X, Y } is self-replicable because there exists a reaction pathway X →∗ 2X + Y ,
and therefore {X, Y } is a critical siphon by Theorem 5.3.1. However, it is not a minimal
critical siphon because {X} is also a critical siphon.
6
Persistence
Definition 6.1. A reaction network G = (S, R) is persistent iff for every choice k : R → R>0
of specific rates, for all initial conditions x(0) ∈ RS>0 , for the mass-action ODE system
ẋ(t) =
X
ky→y0 (y 0 − y)x(t)y ,
y→y 0 ∈R
the omega-limit set ω(x) does not meet ∂RS≥0 , i.e., for every increasing sequence 0 < t1 <
t2 < . . . of positive real numbers tending to +∞, the limit lim x(ti ) ∈
/ ∂RS≥0 .
i→∞
The definition of persistence is standard in dynamical systems, and we have adapted it
here for mass-action systems.
Theorem 6.2. Let G = (S, R) be a positive reaction network. If G has no drainable siphons
then G is persistent.
Proof. We will prove the contrapositive. Suppose G is not persistent. We will first identify
a siphon in G, and then show that siphon to be “drainable.” There exist a point x0 ∈ RS>0
and specific rates k : R → R>0 such that the solution x(t) to the mass-action ODE system
with initial conditions x(0) = x0 violates persistence, so that the omega-limit set ω(x) meets
18
S . From [5, Proposition 1],
the boundary ∂RS≥0 of the positive orthant. Let z ∈ ω(x) ∩ ∂R≥0
we know that the set
Tz := {i | zi = 0}
is a siphon. (Strictly speaking, [5, Proposition 1] is in the context of chemical reaction
networks, but the proof applies without change to positive reaction networks.)
We now show that Tz is drainable. Define ConeR := Cone({y 0 − y | y → y 0 ∈ R}).
We first claim that z ∈ x(0) + ConeR . By definition of ω-limit point, there exists an
increasing sequence 0 < t1 < t2 < . . . of positive real numbers tending to +∞ such that
z = lim x(ti ). Further, writing the integral of the mass-action ODE system as a Riemann
i→∞
sum,
t/h−1
X X
x(t) = x(0) + lim
h · ky→y0 · (y 0 − y) · (x(jh))y ,
h→0
j=0 y→y 0 ∈R
so that
ti /h−1
z = x(0) + lim lim
i→∞ h→0
X
X
h · ky→y0 · (y 0 − y) · (x(jh))y .
j=0 y→y 0 ∈R
Each of the partial sums
ti /h−1
zi,h = x(0) +
X
X
h · ky→y0 · (y 0 − y) · (x(jh))y
j=0 y→y 0 ∈R
is in ConeR because h, ky→y0 , (x(jh))y > 0; the limit exists by choice of ti ; and ConeR is a
closed set by Definition 2.2. Hence, z ∈ x(0) + ConeR .
So there exist non-negative real numbers ay→y0 ∈ R≥0 such that
X
z = x(0) +
ay→y0 (y 0 − y).
y→y 0 ∈R
P
Rewriting this, we get x(0) = z − y→y0 ∈R ay→y0 (y 0 − y) ∈ RS>0 by assumption. Since
RS>0 is open, we can slightly perturb the numbers ay→y0 P
if necessary so that they lie in the
non-negative rational numbers, while ensuring that z − y→y0 ∈R ay→y0 (y 0 − y) remains in
the positive orthant. Now clearing denominators of P
the numbers ay→y0 by multiplying by
a large positive integer L, we get that α := Lz − y→y0 ∈R by→y0 (y 0 − y) ∈ RS>0 , where
by→y0 = Lay→y0 are all non-negative integers. In other words, there is a G-reaction pathway
from α ∈ RS>0 to Lz, showing that TLz = Tz is drainable.
Remark 6.3. Let G = (S, R) be a positive reaction network. If T1 ⊆ S is a drainable
siphon and T2 ⊆ T1 is a siphon then T2 is drainable by Remark 3.4.7. In particular, every
minimal drainable siphon is a minimal siphon. Hence to show that a positive reaction
network is persistent, it is sufficient to show that its minimal siphons are not drainable.
19
The next remark provides a vague indication of future directions for attack on the Global
Attractor Conjecture prompted by the results in this paper.
Remark 6.4. Many reaction networks with drainable siphons are nevertheless persistent.
One natural question to explore is precisely when do minimal drainable siphons cause extinction? If a minimal drainable siphon is simultaneously also self-replicable, then intuitively
it seems as if there is a competition between extinction and autocatalytic growth. Let us
say, very informally, that the self-replicable nature of a minimal critical siphon dominates
the drainable nature if this competition is won by autocatalytic growth, so that there is no
extinction of the species in T .
We will leave this notion of “domination” vague at the moment; making it precise in combinatorial terms, and linking the combinatorics to the dynamics, are two of the challenges
in taking this work forward. In this regard, also see notions of draining, sustaining, and
domination in [20, Proposition 6.26] which are cognate to the present notions of drainable,
self-replicable, and domination respectively.
Note that in weakly-reversible networks, every drainable siphon is also self-replicable
by Theorem 5.3.3. Perhaps the definition of domination, when provided, will allow us
to reformulate the persistence conjecture thus: in weakly-reversible networks, for minimal
critical siphons, the self-replicable nature dominates the drainable nature.
7
Catalytic sets and Catalysis
The goal of this section is to give an elementary proof to Theorem 7.14, which was first
proved in [18] with algebraic geometric techniques. We recall some definitions from [18].
Definition 7.1 (Definition 3.1 in [18]). Let G = (S, R) be a weakly-reversible chemical
reaction network. The event-graph G of G is a directed graph with vertices V (G) = ZS≥0
and edges the G-dilutions y → y 0 where both y, y 0 ∈ ZS≥0 .
Q
Remark 7.2. In [18], the event-graph was defined in terms of the monomials i∈S xyi i and
Q
yi0
i∈S xi because the techniques in that paper came from algebraic geometry. Here we have
rephrased the same definition in terms of dilutions. The equivalence is immediate from
comparing the two definitions.
The next lemma bridges positive and chemical reaction networks. Specifically, it makes
the point that in chemical reaction networks, it is sufficient to consider complexes that have
non-negative integer coordinates, as opposed to non-negative real coordinates.
Lemma 7.3. Let G = (S, R) be a chemical reaction network. If y →∗G y 0 is a reaction
pathway then
1. y − byc = y 0 − by 0 c.
20
2. There is a reaction pathway byc →∗G by 0 c.
Proof. Since G is chemical, each G-reaction (and hence each G-dilution) can only change
the population by an integer vector, and fractional parts of complexes are carried around
unchanged by reaction pathways, which establishes part 1.
To see part 2, suppose y →∗G y 0 corresponds to the sequence of dilutions
y = y(0) → y(1) → . . . → y(m) = y 0 . Then by part 1, since every dilution is a reaction
pathway, y(i) − by(i)c = y − byc for all i. Since G is chemical, removing the fractional part
of a complex does not affect the reactions that can occur with that complex as source. So
by(0)c → by(1)c → . . . → by(m)c is a sequence of dilutions, and there is a reaction pathway
byc →∗G by 0 c.
The next lemma restates the definitions of catalytic and strictly catalytic chemical reaction networks which were introduced in [18] in the language of reaction pathways. Readers
who do not wish to consult [18] at this point may also consider the next lemma as the
definition of catalytic and strictly-catalytic chemical reaction networks, and skip the proof.
Lemma 7.4. A weakly-reversible chemical reaction network G is catalytic (respectively,
strictly catalytic) iff there exist complexes y, y 0 ∈ ZS≥0 such that
y →∗G y 0 but y − min(y, y 0 ) 6→∗G y 0 − min(y, y 0 )
(respectively, y →∗G y 0 but for all k ∈ R>0 , k(y − min(y, y 0 )) 6→∗G k(y 0 − min(y, y 0 ))).
Proof. Since edges in G correspond to dilutions, complexes y, y 0 are path-connected in G
0
0
iff y →∗G y 0 . Next note that gcd(xy , xy ) = xmin(y,y ) . The catalytic part of the lemma now
follows from Definition 3.2 in [18]. To see the strictly catalytic part, first observe that by
Definition 6.1 in [18], G is strictly catalytic iff there exist complexes y, y 0 ∈ ZS≥0 such that
y →∗G y 0 and k(y − min(y, y 0 )) 6→∗G k(y 0 − min(y, y 0 )) for all k ∈ Z≥1 .
It remains to show that the definition does not change if we quantify over all k ∈ R>0 .
One direction is easy. For the other direction, we proceed by contrapositive. Suppose y, y 0 ∈
ZS≥0 are such that y →∗G y 0 and there exists k ∈ R>0 such that k(y − min(y, y 0 )) →∗G k(y 0 −
min(y, y 0 )). By dropping any fractional part if necessary as in Lemma 7.3, we may assume
that k(y − min(y, y 0 )) is an integer vector, so that k is rational. Let p, q be positive integers
such that k = pq . Then we get a reaction pathway kq(y − min(y, y 0 )) →∗G kq(y 0 − min(y, y 0 ))
by applying the above reaction pathway q times. Since kq = p is a positive integer, we are
done.
The intuition behind the definition of “catalytic” is that min(y, y 0 ) prevents the conversion of y − min(y, y 0 ) to y 0 − min(y, y 0 ). “Strictly catalytic” indicates that the conversion is
not possible even with multiple copies of y − min(y, y 0 ).
Note that we have only defined what it means for a network to be (strictly) catalytic, but
have said nothing about which species may be identified as the catalysts. The next definition
21
makes precise this identification of the catalytic species, in the process also extending the
concept of catalysis beyond weakly-reversible chemical reaction networks, to all positive
reaction networks.
Definition 7.5 (Catalytic set). Let G = (S, R) be a positive reaction network. A set T ⊆ S
is catalytic iff there is a reaction pathway y →∗G y 0 such that
1. supp(min(y, y 0 )) = T .
2. y − min(y, y 0 ) 6→∗G y 0 − min(y, y 0 )).
It is strictly-catalytic if in addition k(y −min(y, y 0 )) 6→∗G k(y 0 −min(y, y 0 )) for every k ∈ R>0 .
We immediately obtain the next theorem as an easy consequence.
Theorem 7.6. Let G be a weakly reversible chemical reaction network. Then G has a
catalytic (respectively, strictly-catalytic) set T ⊆ S iff G is catalytic (respectively, strictlycatalytic).
Proof. Immediate from Lemma 7.3, Lemma 7.4 and Definition 7.5.
This theorem allows us to extend the previous definition of catalytic and strictlycatalytic networks from the class of weakly-reversible chemical reaction networks to all
positive reaction networks.
Definition 7.7. A positive reaction network G = (S, R) is catalytic (respectively strictly
catalytic) iff there exists a catalytic (respectively, strictly catalytic) subset T ⊆ S.
Example 7.8. For the reaction network:
3X → 0
X + 2Y → 2Y ,
the set {Y } is catalytic because there exists a reaction pathway X + 2Y →∗G 2Y , but there
is no reaction pathway X →∗G 0. However, it is not strictly catalytic, because there is a
reaction pathway 3X →∗G 0.
For the reaction network:
X +Y →Y
X + 2Y → 2Y ,
the set {Y } is strictly catalytic here because there exists a reaction pathway X + 2Y →∗G 2Y ,
and for all k ∈ R>0 , kX 6→∗G 0, since the absence of Y turns off all reactions.
The next theorem shows how the notions of self-replicable, strictly-catalytic, and siphon
are related.
22
Theorem 7.9. Let G = (S, R) be a positive reaction network. If T ⊆ S is a self-replicable
set that is not strictly-catalytic then no nonempty subset of T is a siphon.
Proof. Suppose T is a self-replicable set that is not strictly-catalytic. Since T is selfreplicable, there exists a reaction pathway y →∗G y 0 such that yi0 − yi > 0 for all i ∈ T .
Since T is not strictly-catalytic, there exists k ∈ R>0 such that k(y − min(y, y 0 )) →∗G k(y 0 −
min(y, y 0 )). Note that for all i ∈ T , k(yi − min(yi , yi0 )) = 0 whereas k(yi0 − min(yi , yi0 )) > 0.
Hence no nonempty subset of T is a siphon by Lemma 3.5.
Example 7.10. The converse of the above theorem is false. Consider the following reaction
network:
X → 2X
Y →X +Y
In this example, no non-empty subset of X is a siphon. Notice that X is self-replicable
because of the reaction pathway X → 2X that increases the number of X. But X is strictly
catalytic as we have a reaction pathway X → 2X, but no reaction pathway 0 → kX for
every k ∈ R>0 .
Corollary 7.11. Let G = (S, R) be a positive reaction network. If T ⊆ S is a self-replicable
siphon then T is a strictly-catalytic set.
Corollary 7.12. Let G = (S, R) be a weakly-reversible positive reaction network. If T ⊆ S
is a critical siphon then T is a strictly-catalytic set.
Proof. By Theorem 5.3.3, Remark 2.10 and Corollary 7.11
From Corollary 7.12 and Theorem 7.6, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 7.13. Weakly-reversible chemical reaction networks with critical siphons are
strictly catalytic.
Since every strictly catalytic network is also catalytic we also obtain an elementary proof
for the following theorem first proved in [18].
Theorem 7.14. Weakly-reversible chemical reaction networks with critical siphons are catalytic.
Note that [18] made a connection between saturated binomial ideals and catalysis, and
used the algebraic geometry of binomial ideals to obtain this result.
Example 7.15. The converse of the above theorem is false. Consider the reaction network
in Example 7.10. In this case, there is a reaction pathway Y →∗ X + Y , but there is no
reaction pathway 0 →∗G X. Hence the set Y is catalytic. But the above network does not
possess any self-replicable siphons. The species X is not a siphon because of the second
reaction. The sets {Y } and {X, Y } are not critical because of the conservation law y.
23
8
Related Work
A reaction network admits various choices for dynamics whose appropriateness depends on
the context of the application. We briefly describe some of the possible choices.
• Mass-action kinetics [21] prescribes a way for going from a reaction network and a
collection of reaction “specific rates” to a system of ordinary differential equations. The
variables of this ODE system are concentrations of the reaction species as functions
of time, and the right-hand sides are polynomials in these variables. Many of the
mathematical results about chemical reaction networks have been proved in the setting
of mass-action kinetics. Such models also appear in the study of power-law systems and
S-systems from biochemical systems theory [45]. Quadratic dynamical systems [42]
studied in computer science to model genetic algorithms are mathematically cognate
to bimolecular mass-action systems. Many models in population biology like predatorprey systems [36, 48] are described as mass-action systems.
• The chemical master equation describes the evolution of species populations as a
continuous-time Markov process, given a “specific propensity” for each reaction. It is
a physically more accurate choice for dynamics than mass-action kinetics, since it also
takes into account stochastic effects. It is especially relevant when modeling reactions
where the species population sizes are small, and the stochastic effects can cause a
significant deviation from mass-action behavior.
• A common choice of dynamics in the computer science community, especially in the
study of Petri nets, is non-deterministic dynamics. The key question here is that of
“reachability:” whether there is a path to go from one population vector to another,
by applying the reactions in any sequence.
• In practice, the rates and propensities of reactions are often not easily obtainable by
experiment. Indeed, they may not even be constants, but may vary in time, or across
assays. This can be captured by mass-action differential inclusions [19], where the
reaction rates simultaneously take all values in a fixed interval bounded away from 0
and +∞.
• The assumption of mass-action can be relaxed to allow other functional forms for
the right-hand sides of the ODEs. Many of the results first proved in the setting of
mass-action can be extended to these more general dynamical systems [9].
• Stochastic and deterministic reaction-diffusion systems combine spatial effects of diffusion with some local dynamical model of the progress of reactions. They are relevant
in settings where the assumption that the reactants are well-mixed no longer holds.
Reaction networks have been studied in chemistry for a long time [21], but they have
also been studied beyond chemistry. In 1962, Carl Petri [40] applied reaction networks to
the study of distributed processes in computer science, and they have come to be known
in this area as “Petri nets.” Kauffman [33] has conjectured a key role for autocatalytic
reaction networks in the origin of life.
24
In recent times, advances in systems and synthetic biology and molecular computation
have given a new impetus to the study of reaction networks. It is now commonplace wisdom
in biology that the sophisticated behavior of living systems emerges from the dynamics
of their reaction networks. As high-throughput techniques uncover more details about
these biochemical reaction networks, the questions of inference and control of dynamical
properties of the system from this combinatorial data becomes more compelling. Such
efforts are already underway in the areas of Flux Balance Analysis [31, 38], and Biochemical
Systems Theory [45]. It is hoped that a deep mathematical understanding of reaction
networks would aid such efforts.
In the area of molecular computation, researchers have engineered proof-of-principle
molecular circuits that synthesize sophisticated behavior [41]. Interesting applications would
result if these constructions could be scaled economically by two orders of magnitude. One
problem with attempts at scaling has been “retroactivity:” composition of two reaction
networks leads to changes in the behavior of each network [51], so that the gestalt dynamics
does not have the targeted behavior. To obtain a good compositional scheme for reaction
networks, it may be helpful to investigate whether there are mathematically-natural ways
for reaction networks to be composed, and decomposed.
The persistence conjecture [12] is a good candidate problem for gauging progress in our
understanding of the dynamics of reaction networks. In recent times, there has been a
resurgence of interest in this conjecture [8, 39, 2, 18, 19, 20], and in critical siphons [3, 4,
44, 18].
Autocatalysis almost certainly plays a central role in the complexity and self-organization
exhibited by living systems, and possibly also played a role in the origin of life [33]. Autocatalysis is also a feature of synthetic DNA molecular circuits that perform signal amplification [49, 50] — signal amplification is essential for the scaling of molecular circuit
constructions.
Our notion of “self-replicable siphons” may be relevant in the context of Kauffman’s
program [33] of explaining the origin of life using autocatalytic sets of reactions. Autocatalytic sets of reactions have been studied extensively [47, 24, 37, 23, 26, 25, 27, 29, 30, 16,
32, 11, 10]. The notion of self-replicable siphons (Definition 3) appears to be cognate with
the idea of autocatalytic sets, and has a certain mathematical naturalness to it.
Acknowledgements. We thank Jaikumar Radhakrishnan for pointing out that our proof
of Theorem 4.9 showed a result mildly stronger (Rn<0 ⊆ cone(rows(A))) than what we had
asserted in a previous draft (cone(rows(A)) ∩ Rn<0 is nonempty). We thank the referees for
useful comments.
25
References
[1] Leonard Adleman, Manoj Gopalkrishnan, Ming-Deh Huang, Pablo Moisset, and Dustin
Reishus, On the mathematics of the law of mass action, preprint, 2008, http://arXiv.
org:0810.1108.
[2] David F. Anderson, A proof of the global attractor conjecture in the single linkage class
case, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 71 (2011), no. 4, 1487–1508.
[3]
, Global asymptotic stability for a class of nonlinear chemical equations, SIAM
J. Appl. Math. 68 (2008), no. 5, 1464–1476.
[4] David F. Anderson and Anne Shiu, The dynamics of weakly reversible population processes near facets, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70 (2010), no. 6, 1840–1858.
[5] David Angeli, Patrick De Leenheer, and Eduardo Sontag, A Petri net approach to persistence analysis in chemical reaction networks, Biology and Control Theory: Current
Challenges (Isabelle Queinnec, Sophie Tarbouriech, Germain Garcia, and Silviu-Iulian
Niculescu, eds.), Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 357, Springer
Berlin/Heidelberg, 2007, 10.1007/978-3-540-71988-5_9, 181–216.
[6] Luca Cardelli, Strand algebras for DNA Computing, DNA and molecular programming,
Lecture notes in computer science, 5877 (2009), 12–24.
[7] Ho-Lin Chen, David Doty, David Soloveichik, Deterministic Function Computation with
Chemical Reaction Networks, Preliminary extended abstract in Proceedings of DNA Computing and Molecular Programming. 18 (2012), no.7433, 25–42.
[8] Gheorghe Craciun, Casian Pantea, and Fedor Nazarov, Persistence and permanence
of mass-action and power-law dynamical systems, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 73(1) (2013),
305–329.
[9] Pete Donnell and Murad Banaji, Local and global stability of equilibria for a class of
chemical reaction networks, SIAM J. Appl. Dynamical Systems 12(2) 2012, 899–920.
[10] Freeman Dyson, A model for the origin of life, Journal of Molecular Evolution. 18
(1982), 344–350.
[11] Manfred Eigen and Peter Schuster, The hypercycle: a principle of natural selforganization. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle. Naturwissenschaften. 64 (1977), 541–
565.
[12] Martin Feinberg, Necessary and sufficient conditions for detailed balancing in massaction systems of arbitrary complexity, Chem. Eng. Sci. 44 (1989), no. 9, 1819 –1827.
26
[13]
, Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal
reactorsi.e. the deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems, Chem. Eng. Sci. 42 (1987),
no. 10, 2229–2268.
[14]
, Lectures on chemical reaction networks, unpublished lecture notes, 1979, http:
//www.che.eng.ohio-state.edu/~FEINBERG/LecturesOnReactionNetworks/.
[15]
, On chemical kinetics of a certain class, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 46 (1972).
[16] Varun Giri and Sanjay Jain, The origin of large molecules in primordial autocatalytic
reaction networks, PLoS ONE. 7(1), (2012), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029546.
[17] Gilles Gnacadja, Reachability, persistence, and constructive chemical reaction networks
(part I): reachability approach to the persistence of chemical reaction networks, J Math
Chem. 49 (2011), 2117–2136.
[18] Manoj Gopalkrishnan, Catalysis in reaction networks, Bull Math Biol. 73 (2011), no.12
2962–2982.
[19] Manoj Gopalkrishnan, Ezra Miller, Anne Shiu, A projection argument for differential
inclusions, with application to mass-action kinetics, SIGMA. 9 (2013), 025, 25 pages.
[20]
, A geometric approach to the Global Attractor Conjecture, (2013), http://
arxiv.org/pdf/1305.5303v1.pdf.
[21] Cato M. Guldberg and Peter Waage, Studies concerning affinity, Journal of chemical
education. 63 (1986), 1044.
[22] Jeremy Gunawardena, Chemical reaction network theory for in-silico biologists, (2003),
http://vcp.med.harvard.edu/papers/crnt.pdf.
[23] Wim Hordijk, Jotun Hein, Mike Steel, Autocatalytic sets and the origin of life, Entropy.
12(7) (2010), 1733–1742.
[24] Wim Hordijk, Mike Steel, Detecting autocatalytic, self-sustaining sets in chemical reaction systems, Journal of Theoretical Biology. 227(4) (2004), 451–461.
[25]
, Predicting template-based catalysis rates in a simple catalytic reaction model,
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 295 (2012), 132–138.
[26] Wim Hordijk, Stuart Kauffman, Mike Steel, Required levels of catalysis for emergence
of autocatalytic sets in models of chemical reaction systems, International Journal of
Molecular Sciences. 12(5) (2011), 3085–3101.
[27] Wim Hordijk, Mike Steel, Stuart Kauffman, The structure of autocatalytic sets: Evolvability, enablement, and emergence, Acta Biotheoretica. 60(4) (2012), 379–392.
27
[28] Friedrich J. M. Horn, The dynamics of open reaction systems, Mathematical aspects
of chemical and biochemical problems and quantum chemistry (New York), Proc. SIAMAMS Sympos. Appl. Math.,vol. VIII, (1974).
[29] Sanjay Jain and Sandeep Krishna, Autocatalytic Sets and the Growth of Complexity in
an Evolutionary Model, Physical Review Letters. 81 (1998), 5684–5687.
[30]
, A model for the emergence of cooperation, interdependence, and structure in
evolving networks, PNAS. 98 (2000), 543–547.
[31] Kenneth J Kauffman, Purusharth Prakash, Jeremy S Edwards, Advances in flux balance
analysis, Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 14(5) (2003), 491-496.
[32] Stuart Kauffman, Cellular homeostasis, epigenesis and replication in randomly aggregated macromolecular systems, Journal of Cybernetics. 1 (1971), 71–96.
[33]
, At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and
Complexity. Oxford University Press. (1995) ISBN 0-19-509599-5.
[34]
, Autocatalytic sets of proteins, Journal of theoretical Biology. 119 (1986), 1–24.
[35]
, The origins of order. Oxford University Press, (1993).
[36] Alfred J. Lotka, Elements of Physical Biology, Williams and Wilkins (1925).
[37] Elchanan Mossel, Mike Steel, Random biochemical networks: The probability of selfsustaining autocatalysis, Journal of Theoretical Biology. 233(3) (2005), 327–336.
[38] Jeffrey D Orth, Ines Thiele, Bernhard O Palsson, What is flux balance analysis?, Nature
Biotechnology. 28 (2010) 245–248.
[39] Casian Pantea, On the persistence and global stability of mass-action systems, SIAM
J. Math. Anal. 44 (2012), no.3, 1636–1673.
[40] Carl Petri, Kommunikation mit Automaten, Ph. D. Thesis. University of Bonn, (1962).
[41] Lulu Qian and Erik Winfree, A simple DNA gate motif for synthesizing large-scale
circuits, J.R.Soc. Interface 8(62) (2011), 1281–1297.
[42] Yuri Rabinovich, Alistair Sinclair and Avi Wigderson, Quadratic dynamical systems,
Proc. of the 33rd Ann. IEEE Symp. on Foudations of Computer Science, (1992), 304–313.
[43] Alexander Schrijver, Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. John Wiley and Sons,
(1986).
[44] Anne Shiu and Bernd Sturmfels, Siphons in chemical reaction networks, Bull. Math.
Biol. 72 (2010), no.6, 1448–1463.
28
[45] Michael A. Savageau, Eberhard O. Voit, Douglas H. Irvine, Biochemical systems theory
and metabolic control theory: 1. fundamental similarities and differences, Math.Biosci
86(2) (1987), 127–145.
[46] David Soloveichik, Matt Cook, Erik Winfree, Shuki Bruck, Computation with Finite
Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks, Natural Computing. 7(4) (2008), 615–633.
[47] Mike Steel, The emergence of a self-catalysing structure in abstract origin-of-life models,
Applied Mathematics Letters. 3 (2000), 91–95.
[48] Vito Volterra, Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d’individui in specie animali conviventi, Mem. Acad. Lincei Rom. 2, (1926), 31–113.
[49] Peng Yin, Harry M.T. Choi, Colby R. Calvert, Niles A. Pierce, Programming biomolecular self-assembly pathways, Nature Letters. 451(7176) (2008), 318–322.
[50] David Yu Zhang, Andrew J. Turberfield, Bernard Yurke, Erik Winfree, Engineering
Entropy-Driven Reactions and Networks Catalyzed by DNA, Science 318 (2007), no. 5853
1121–1125.
[51] Domitilla Del Vecchio, Alexander J Ninfa, Eduardo D Sontag, Modular cell biology:
retroactivity and insulation, Molecular Systems Biology, 4(161) (2008).
[52] Andrew Phillips, Luca Cardelli, A programming language for composable DNA circuits,
Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 6, Suppl. 4, pp. S419–S436, (2009).
[53] David Soloveichik, Georg Seelig, Erik Winfree, DNA as a universal substrate for chemical kinetics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, no. 12, pp. 5393–5398,
(2010).
[54] Grzegorz Rozenberg, Advances in Petri Nets, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (1990).
29
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1305.0840v1 [math.AC] 3 May 2013
THE MONOMIAL CONJECTURE AND ORDER IDEALS
S. P. Dutta
Abstract. In this article first we prove that a special case of the order ideal conjecture,
originating from the work of Evans and Griffith in equicharacteristic, implies the monomial
conjecture due to M. Hochster. We derive a necessary and sufficient condition for the validity
of this special case in terms certain syzygis of canonical modules of normal domains possessing
free summands. We also prove some special cases of this observation.
The main focus of this paper is to establish a relation between the monomial conjecture
due to Hochster [Ho1] and the assertion on order ideals of minimal generators of syzygies of
modules of finite projection dimension, introduced and proved by Evans and Griffith ([EG1], [E-G2]) for equicharacteristic local rings. The monomial conjecture asserts that given
t+1
a local ring R and a system of parameters x1 , . . . , xn of R, (x1 . . . xn )t 6∈ xt+1
.
1 , . . . , xn
In [Ho1] Hochster proved this assertion for the equicharacteristic case and proposed it
as a conjecture for local rings of all characteristics. He also showed ([Ho1]) that this
conjecture is equivalent to the direct summand conjecture for module-finite extension of
regular rings. From the equational point of view both these conjectures claim that the
n
P
polynomial equation (X1 . . . Xn )t −
Yi Xit+1 = 0 (Xi , Yj s are variables) cannot have a
i=1
solution {x1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yn } in any noetherian ring, unless the height of (x1 , . . . , xn )
is less than n. In the early eighties in order to prove their syzygy theorem ([E-G1]),
[E-G2]) Evans and Griffith proved an important aspect of order ideals of syzygies over
equicharacteristic local rings. We would like to generalize and state their result as a
conjecture on arbitrary local rings in the following way.
AMS Subject Classification: Primary 13D02, 13D22; secondary 13C15, 13D25, 13H05
Key words and phrases: Regular local ring, order ideal, grade, syzygy, canonical module.
Typeset by AMS-TEX
1
Order ideal conjecture. Let (R, m) be a local ring. Let M be a finitely generated module
of finite projective dimension over R and let Syzi (M ) denote its ith syzygy for i > 0.
If β is a minimal generator of Syzi (M ), then the order ideal OSyzi (M ) (β)(= {f (β)|f ∈
HomR (Syzi (M ), R)}) has grade ≥ i.
For their proof of the syzygy theorem Evans and Griffith actually needed a particular
case of this conjecture: M is locally free on the punctured spectrum and R is regular
local. They reduced the proof of the above conjecture for this special case to the validity
of the improved new intersection conjecture (also introduced by them) and proved its
validity over equicharacteristic local rings by using big Cohen-Macaulay modules. In the
mid-eighties Hochster ([Ho3]) proposed a new conjecture that is deeply homological in
nature—the canonical element conjecture. In this conjecture Hochster assigns a canonical
element ηR to every local ring R and asserts that ηR 6= 0. He proved this conjecture for
the equicharacteristic case. In the same paper Hochster ([Ho2]) showed that the canonical
element conjecture is equivalent to the monomial conjecture and it implies the improved
new intersection conjecture due to Evans and Griffith. Later this author proved the reverse
implication ([D1]). Thus, the monomial conjecture implies a special case of the order ideal
conjecture: the case when M is locally free on the punctured spectrum of R.
In this article we would prove that the validity of the order ideal conjecture over regular
local rings (actually a special case of it) implies the monomial conjecture. First we would
like to propose the following definition.
Consider a finitely generated module M of finite projective dimension over a local ring
R with a minimal free resolution (F• , β• ). Let Syzi (M ) denote the ith syzygy of M in F• .
We say that for i ≥ 1, Syzi (M ) satisfies the property (0) or simply (0) if for every minimal
generator α of Syzi (M ), the ideal I generated by the entries of α in Fi−1 has grade ≥ i.
In our main theorem (Theorem 1.4) we prove the following:
Theorem. The monomial conjecture is valid for all local rings if for every almost complete
intersection ideal J of height d in any regular local ring (R, m), d < dimension of R,
Syzd+1 (R/J) satisfies (0).
The idea involved in the proof of this theorem evolved gradually through our work in
([D5], [D7], [D-G]). Actually our assertion is more specific than what is stated above. We
2
derive the following from the proof of the above theorem.
Corollary (Notations as above). The monomial conjecture is valid for all local rings if
for every almost complete intersection ideal J of height d in a regular local ring (R, m),
N
Kd+1 (J; R) k → TorR
d+1 (R/J, k) is the 0-map where K• (J; R) is the Koszul complex
corresponding to J in R and k = R/m.
Next we prove a proposition (Prop. 1.5) that replaces the previous assertion involving
J with the canonical module Ω of R/J. Let J = (x1 , . . . , xd , λ) and let x = (x1 , . . . , xd )
denote the ideal generated by an R-sequence. As a corollary we derive:
R
The monomial conjecture is valid if TorR
d (k, R/x) → Tord (k, R/(x + Ω)) is the zero
R
map (equivalently TorR
d (k, Ω) → Tord (k, R/x) is non zero).
The following proposition (prop. 1.6) provides a characterization of the above statement
in terms of syzygies of canonical modules.
Proposition (Notations as above). If Kd+1 (J; R)
N
k → TorR
d+1 (R/J, k) is the 0-map
then Syzd (Ω) (minimal) has a free summand. Conversely, if I is an ideal of R of height d
such that R/I satisfies the Serre-condition S2 and its canonical module Ω is such that
R
Syzd (Ω) has a free summand, then TorR
d (Ω, k) → Tord (R/x, k) is non-zero, where x
denotes the ideal generated by a maximal R-sequence in I.
As a corollary to our next theorem we observe the following:
Let (R, m) be a equicharacteristic regular local ring. Let I be an ideal in R of codimension d and let Ω denote the canonical module of R/I. Then Syzd (Ω) has a free summand.
Remark. The above assertion is also valid in the graded equicharacteristic case via the
same mode of proof.
In this connection let us recall that for any finitely generated module M of grade g, no
Syzi (M ) can have a free summand for i < g ([D2]).
Our next theorem describes the special cases where we can at present prove that Syzd (Ω)
possesses a free summand.
Theorem. Let (R, m, k) be a regular local ring in mixed characteristic p > 0 and let I
be an ideal of height d in R. Let x denote the ideal generated by a maximal R-sequence
contained in I and Let Ω = HomR (R/I, R/x) denote the canonical module of R/I. Then
3
R
d
TorR
d (Ω, k) → Tord (R/x, k) is non-zero (equivalently Syz (Ω) possesses a free summand)
in the following cases: 1) Ω is S3 and 2) the mixed characteristic p is a non-zero-divisor
on Extd+1 (R/I, R).
In our last proposition (1.7) we derive a sufficient condition for Syzd (Ω) to possess a
free summand. We prove that if Ω′ denotes the lift of Ω in R via R → R/x and if at least
one of x1 , . . . , xd is contained in mΩ′ , then Syzd (Ω) has a free summand.
Throughout this work “local” means noetherian local. Over the years different aspects
of the monomial conjecture have been studied, special cases have been proved and new
equivalent forms have been introduced (see [Bh], [Br-H], [D1], [D2], [D3], [D4], [D5], [D6],
[D-G], [Go], [He], [K], [O], [R3], [V]). Statements of four equivalent forms of this set of
conjectures, as proposed by Hochster in [Ho3] are given below for the convenience of the
reader.
A. Direct Summand Conjecture (DSC).
Let R be a regular local ring, and let i : R ֒→ A be a module-finite extension of R. Then
i splits as an R-module map.
B. Canonical Element Conjecture (CEC).
Let A be a local ring of dimension n with maximal ideal m and residue field k. Let Si
denote the ith syzygy of k in a minimal resolution of k over A, and let θn : ExtnA (k, Sn ) →
n
Hm
(Sn ) denote the direct limit map. Then θn (class of the identity map on Sn ) 6= 0.
C. Improved New Intersection Conjecture (INIC). Let A be as before. Let F• be
a complex of finitely generated free A-modules,
F• : 0 → Fs → Fs−1 → · · · → F1 → F0 → 0,
such that ℓ(Hi (F• )) < ∞ for i > 0 and H0 (F• ) has a minimal generator annihilated by a
power of the maximal ideal m. Then dim A ≤ s.
D. Let (A, m, k = A/m) be a local ring of dimension n which is a homomorphic image of
a Gorenstein ring. Let Ω denote the canonical module of A. Then the direct limit map
n
ExtnA (k, Ω) → Hm
(Ω) is non-null.
Recall that for any equivalent version of this set of conjectures one can assume that
the local ring A is a complete local (normal) domain. We have A = R/P̃ , where R is a
4
complete regular local ring. Let S = R/y, where y is the ideal generated by a maximal
R-sequence contained in P̃ . Then A = S/P , P = P̃ /y. Let Ω denote the canonical module
for A; Ω can be identified with HomS (A, S)—an ideal of S. Let E denote the injective hull
of the residue field of S (resp. R) over S (resp. R). For any S-module (R-module) T , we
write T ∨ to denote HomS (T, E) (HomR (T, E)) and dim T to denote the Krull dimension
of T . These notations will be utilized throughout this article.
Section 1
Our first proposition is an observation due to Strooker and Stückrad on a characterization of the monomial conjecture ([Str-Stü]). This author independently proved a similar
characterization for the direct summand conjecture ([D5]). Since our main focus is on a
proof of the monomial conjecture we provide a proof of this result here.
1.1 Proposition (Th. [Str-Stü]). With notations as above, A satisfies MC if and only if
for any system of parameters x1 , . . . , xn of S, Ω is not contained in (x1 , . . . , xn ).
Proof. Let ξ1 , . . . , ξn be a system of parameters of A. We can lift it to a system of parameters x1 , . . . , xn for S such that Im(xi ) = ξi , 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Conversely, any system of
parameters for S is a system of parameters for A. Let us write x = (x1 , . . . , xn ) and
ξ = (ξ1 , . . . , ξn ). The monomial conjecture for A is equivalent to the assertion that, for
n
every system of parameters ξ1 , . . . , ξn of A, the direct limit map α : A/ξ → Hm
(A) is nonn
(S)
null [Ho1]. Because S is a complete intersection, the direct limit map β : S/x → Hm
S
is non-null (mS = maximal ideal of S). We have the following commutative diagram
S/x
η
y
A/ξ
β
n
Hm
(S)
S
γ
y
−−−−→
ց
α
n
−−−−→ Hm
(A)
n
where η is induced by the natural surjection η : S → A and γ = Hm
(η). This implies that
S
n
α is non-null ⇔ α ◦ η = γ ◦ β is non-null ⇔ Hm
(A)∨ → (S/x)∨ is non-null ⇔ Im(Ω → S/x)
n
(A)∨ = Ω).
is non-null ⇔ Ω 6⊂ x (recall that, by local duality, Hm
In our next proposition we deduce the validity of the monomial conjecture for all local
rings from the validity of the same for all local almost complete intersections. We prove
the following:
5
1.2 Proposition. The monomial conjecture is valid for all local rings if and only if it
holds for all local almost complete intersections.
Proof. Suppose MC holds for all local almost complete intersections. Let A be a complete
local domain. Then we have A = R/P̃ , where R is a complete regular local ring. We can
choose y1 , . . . , yr —a maximal R sequence in P in such a way that P̃ RP̃ = (y1 , . . . , yr )RP̃ .
Write S = R/y, where y = (y1 , . . . , yr ) and P = P̃ /y. Then S is a complete intersection,
A = S/P , dim S = dim A, and P SP = 0. Let Ω = HomS (A, S), the canonical module
of A. Consider the primary decomposition of (0) in S: 0 = P ∩ q2 ∩ · · · ∩ qh , where qi
is Pi -primary and height Pi = height P = 0 for 2 ≤ i ≤ h. It can be checked easily
S
that Ω = q2 ∩ · · · ∩ qh . Choose λ ∈ P − i≥2 Pi . Then Ω = Hom(S/λS, S), and S/λS is
an almost complete intersection. Since S/λS satisfies MC by assumption, it follows from
the above proposition that Ω is not contained in the ideal generated by any system of
parameters in S. Hence, by Prop. 1.1, A satisfies MC.
Now we reduce the assertion in the monomial conjecture to a length inequality between
Tor0 and Tor1 on regular local rings.
1.3 Proposition. The monomial conjecture is valid for all local rings if and only if for
every regular local ring R and for every pair of ideals (I, J) of R such that i) I is a complete
intersection, ii) J is an almost complete intersection (i.e., J is minimally generated by
(height J + 1) elements), iii) height I + height J = dim R and iv) (I + J) is primary to the
maximal ideal of R, the following length inequality holds:
ℓ (R/(I + J)) > ℓ TorR
1 (R/I, R/J) .
Proof. First assume that every pair of (I, J), as in the statement of our theorem, satisfies
the length inequality:
ℓ(R/(I + J)) > ℓ(TorR
1 (R/I, R/J)).
By Prop. 1.2, we can assume that A is an almost complete intersection ring of the form
S/λS, where S is a complete intersection and dim S = dim A. Let Ω = Hom(S/λS, S)
denote the canonical module for A. We consider the short exact sequence
f
0 → S/Ω −
→ S → S/λS → 0,
6
(1)
where f (1) = λ. Let x′′1 , . . . , x′′n be a system of parameters for A. We can lift x′′1 , . . . , x′′n
to x′1 , . . . , x′n in S in such a way that {x′1 , . . . , x′n } form a system of parameters in S. Let
x′′ = (x′′1 , . . . , x′′n ) and x′ = (x′1 , . . . , x′n ). Tensoring (1) with S/x′ yields the following exact
sequence
f
0 → TorS1 (S/x′ , S/λS) → S/(Ω + x′ ) −
→ S/x′ → S/(x′ + λS) → 0,
(2)
where f is induced by f . Then we have the following
Ω 6⊂ x′ ⇔ ℓ(S/(x′ + λS)) > ℓ(Tor1 (S/x′ , S/λS)).
(3)
As in the proof of the previous proposition, let R be a complete regular local ring
mapping onto S. Now lift x′1 , . . . , x′n to an R-sequence x1 , . . . , xn in R. Write I = x and
J = (y, λ). Then (3) translates to ℓ(R/(I + J)) > ℓ(Tor1 (R/I, R/J)), as required in our
statement.
For the converse part of the theorem, write I = (x1 , . . . , xn ) and J = (y1 , . . . , yr , λ),
where x1 , . . . , xn and y1 , . . . , yr form R-sequences such that n + r = dim R. Let S =
R/(y1 , . . . , yr ) and A = S/λS, and let x′i = Im(xi ) in S for 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Write x′ =
(x′1 , . . . , x′n ) and x = (x1 , . . . , xn ). Since I + J is primary to the maximal ideal and since
both R/x and S are complete intersections, it follows from [Se] that TorR
i (R/x, S) = 0 for
S
′
i > 0. This implies that TorR
i (R/I, R/J) = Tori (S/x , A) for i ≥ 0. Let Ω = HomS (A, S),
the canonical module for A. Now (1)–(3) and the subsequent arguments complete the
proof.
1.4. Our main theorem is the following.
Theorem. The monomial conjecture is valid for all local rings if for every almost complete intersection ideal J of height d in any regular local ring R, d < dim R, Syzd+1 (R/J)
satisfies (0).
Proof. By Prop.1.3 it is enough to prove the following.
Theorem. Let (R, m) be a regular local ring and let I, J be two ideals of R such that
i) R/I is Gorenstein and J is an almost complete intersection, ii) I + J is m-primary
7
and iii) height I + height J = dim R. Let n = height I and d = height J. Suppose that
d < dim R and Syzd+1 (R/J) satisfies (0). Then
ℓ (R/(I + J)) > ℓ TorR
1 (R/I, R/J) .
Proof. Let J = (y1 , . . . , yd , λ) where {y1 , . . . , yd } form an R-sequence. Let (K• , γ• ) =
K• (y1 , . . . , yd , λ; R) denote the Koszul complex corresponding to y1 , . . . , yd , λ and let H =
H1 (y1 , . . . , yd , λ; R). Let L• be a minimal free resolution of H and let ψ• : L• → K• (1) be
a lift of H ֒→ coker γ2 = G. We have the following commutative diagram
L• :
K• (1) :
−→ Rrd+1 −→ Rrd −→
yψd
0
−→ R
γd+1
Rrd−1 −→ · · · −→ Rr0 −→ H −→ 0
∩
ψ
ψ
y
y 0
y d−1
γ2
−−−→ Rd+1 −→ · · · −→ Rd+1 −→ G −→ 0
The mapping cone of ψ• is a free resolution of J and thereby provides a free resolution
of R/J from which a minimal resolution (F• , β• ) of R/J can be extracted.
Claim. Im ψd = R.
Proof of the Claim. If not, then Im ψd ⊂ m. Then the copy of R = Kd+1 would be a free
summand of Fd+1 . Let α be the image of (1, 0) in Syzd+1 (R/J) ⊂ Fd . Since βd+1 (1, 0)
y1
y2
.
is a part or whole of
.. , the height of the ideal generated by the entries of α must
yd
λ
be less than (d + 1). This contradicts our hypotheses that Syzd+1 (R/J) satisfies (0) and
hence Im ψd = R.
This means that if η• : K• → F• lifts the identity map on R/J, then ηd+1 (R) ⊂ m Fd+1 .
Recall that the spectral sequences {ExtpR (R/J, ExtqR (R/I, R))} and {ExtiR (TorR
j (R/J,
R/I), R)} converge to the same limit when p + q = i + j. Since R/I is Gorenstein, we
have ExtiR (R/I, R) = 0 for i 6= n and ExtnR (R/I, R) ≃ R/I. Since ℓ(R/(I + J)) < ∞ and
R is regular local of dimension (n + d), each of the above spectral sequence degenerates.
Hence
R
Tor
(R/J,
R/I),
R
≃ Extd+1
Extn+d
1
R (R/J, R/I).
R
8
(1)
By (1) and local duality we have
ℓ
TorR
1 (R/I,
d+1
R/J) = ℓ ExtR (R/J, R/I) .
(2)
We also note that since n + d = dim R and ℓ (R/(I + J)) < ∞, ExtiR (H, R/I) = 0 for
i < d.
The mapping cone of ψ• leads to the following exact sequence:
0 → K• → (a free resolution of R/J from the mapping cone of ψ• ) → L• (−2) → 0.
d−1
(H, R/I) = 0 applying HomR (−, R/I) to this sequence we obtain the followSince ExtR
ing short exact sequence
d+1
(y1 , . . . , yd , λ; R/I) = R/(I + J).
0 → Extd+1
R (R/J, R/I) → H
This inclusion cannot be an isomorphism since ηd+1 (R) ⊂ m Fd+1 .
Thus, from (2), ℓ (R/(I + J)) > ℓ TorR
1 (R/I, R/J) and the proof of our theorem is
complete.
We have the following corollary from the above proof.
Corollary. The monomial conjecture is valid if for every almost complete intersection
N
ideal J of height d in a regular local ring (R, m, k = R/m), Kd+1 (J; R) k → Tord+1 (R/J, k)
is the 0-map where K• (J; R) is the Koszul complex corresponding to J in R.
The proof of this corollary follows from our observation after the diagram and the claim
in the proof of the above theorem.
1.5. In our next proposition we study the assertion in the above corollary.
Proposition. Let (R, m) be a local ring of dim n. Let {x1 , . . . , xd } ⊂ m be a regular sequence on R and let λ be a 0-divisor and not a parameter on R/x, x = the ideal generated
by x1 , . . . , xd . Let Ω = Hom(R/(x, λ), R/x). Let K• (x, λ; R) = K• (x1 , . . . , xd , λ; R) and
K• (x; R) denote the Koszul complexes corresponding to x1 , . . . , xd , λ and x1 , . . . , xd respectively. Let (L• , c• ) be a minimal free resolution of Ω. Let ψ• : L• → K• (x, λ; γ• )(+1) and
φ• : L• → K• (x; δ• ) be lifts of Ω ≃ H1 (x, λ; R) ֒→ G = Coker γ2 and Ω ֒→ R/x respectively.
Then Im ψd = R if and only if Im φd = R.
9
Proof. We have the following commutative diagrams:
L• :
Rrd+1 −→ Rrd −→ Rrd−1 −→ · · · −→ Rr0
y
yψd−1
y ψd
−→
K• (x, λ; R)(+1) : 0
−→ R
−→ H1 = Ω −→ 0
∩
y
−→ Rd+1 −→ · · · −→ Rd+1 −→ G
(1)
−→ 0
and
L• :
−→ Rrd+1 −→ Rrd −→ Rrd−1 −→ · · · −→ Rr0 −→ Ω
∩
yφd
yφd−1
y
y
0
−→ R
α
d
−→
Rd
−→ · · · −→ R
−→ 0
(2)
−→ R/x −→ 0
Suppose that Im ψd = R. Let η• : K• (x, λ; R)(+1) → K• (x; R) denote the natural
surjection. Since ηd = IdR , ηd · ψd : Rrd → R is surjective. Since η• · ψ• : L• → K• (x; R)
lifts Ω ֒→ R/x, η• ψ• is homotopic to φ• . Hence φd (Rrd ) = R. Conversely let Im φd = R.
Let multiplication by λ : K• (x; R) → K• (x; R) lift the multiplication by λ on R/x. Since
λΩ = 0 in R/x, λ· φ• is homotopic to the 0-map: L• → K• (x; R). Let h• = (hi )0≤i≤d−1
d
denote corresponding homotopies; h : Rri → R(i+1) . Since K (x, λ; R) is the mapping
i
•
cone of λ : K• (x; R) → K• (x; R), we can define
ψ•′
: L• → K• (x; λ; R), lifting Ω = H1 ֒→ G,
in the following way: ψ•′ (Rri ) = (φi , hi ). Then ψd′ (Rrd ) = R. Since ψ•′ , ψ• both lift the
inclusion Ω ֒→ G, they are homotopic and hence ψd (Rrd ) = R.
Corollary (with notations as above). Let J = (x1 , . . . , xd , λ) be an almost complete intersection ideal in a regular local ring (R, m, k) and let Ω denote the canonical module of
N
R
R/J. Then Kd+1 (J; R) k → TorR
d+1 (R/J, k) is the 0-map if and only if Tord (R/x, k) →
R
R
TorR
d (R/(x + Ω), k) is the 0-map or equivalently Tord (Ω, k) → Tord (R/x, k) is non-zero.
1.6. The following proposition is partially a consequence of the above proposition.
Proposition (Notations as in the previous corollary). If Kd+1 (J; R)
N
k → TorR
d+1 (R/J, k)
is the 0-map then Syzd (Ω) (minimal) has a free summand. Conversely, if I is an ideal of
R of height d such that R/I is S2 and its canonical module Ω is such that Syzd (Ω) has
R
a free summand, then TorR
d (Ω, k) → Tord (R/x, k) is non-zero, where x denotes the ideal
generated by a maximal R-sequence in I.
10
Proof. Let us assume that Kd+1 (J; R)
N
k → TorR
d+1 (R/J, k) is the 0-map. This implies,
by diagram (1) in the proof of the above proposition, that ψd (Ld ) = R. Then we can write
L
Ld = R F where F = ker ψd . Hence, from the commutativity of the diagram (1) in
proposition (1.5), it follows that cd+1 (Ld+1 ) ⊂ F and this implies that Syzd (Ω) has a free
summand.
Conversely let (L• , c• ) denote a minimal free resolution of Ω. If Syzd (Ω) has a free
summand then Ld has a free generator e such that c∗d+1 (e∗ ) = 0 (−∗ = HomR (−, R)).
Let L∗• denote the complex 0 → L∗0 → L∗1 → ... → L∗d → G → 0. Since grade Ω > d,
L∗• is exact. Then im e∗ ∈ Extd (Ω, R) is non-zero and is a minimal generator of G. Let
x1 , . . . , xd be a maximal R sequence contained in I and let x denote the ideal generated by
∼ Hom(Ω, Ω) ∼
them. Since R/I is S2 , we have Extd (Ω, R) =
= R/I. Let Gd+i = Coker c∗
d+i
for i > 1. We consider the following short exact sequences :
0 → R/I → G → Im c∗d+1 → 0, 0 → Im c∗d+1 → L∗d+1 → Gd+1 → 0,
0 → Extd+1 (Ω, R) → Gd+1 → Im c∗d+2 → 0, . . . ,
0 → Im c∗n−2 → L∗n−2 → Extn−2 (Ω, R) → 0.
Since Ω is S2 , it follows from the above sequences that grade Exti (Ω, R) > i + 2 for
i > d and hence it can be easily checked that Ω = Extd (G, R) ∼
= Extd (R/I, R). Let
R
α denote the composite of R/x → R/I ∼
=
ExtdR (Ω, R)
R
֒→ G, where im1 ∈ R/x goes to
im e∗ ∈ Extd (Ω, R). Let φ∗• : K• (x; R) → L∗• denote a lift of α. Then φ• : L• → K • (x; R)
lifts the injection Ω = Extd (G, R) ֒→ R/x, where φd (Ld ) = R. Thus, we obtain our
required assertion.
In our next theorem we prove that for any ideal in a regular local ring the first part of
the above proposition is implied by the validity of the order ideal conjecture.
Theorem. Let us assume that the order ideal conjecture is valid for a regular local ring
(R, m, k). Let I be any ideal of R of codimension d and let Ω denote the canonical module
of R/I. Then Syzd (Ω) has a free summand.
Proof. Let (F• , φ• ) :→ Fd → Fd−1 → · · · → F1 → R → 0 denote a minimal free resolution
φ∗
1
of R/I over R. Let F•∗ denote the complex: 0 → R −−→
F1∗ → · · · → Fd∗ → Gd → 0
11
where Gd+i = Coker φ∗d+i , for 0 ≤ i ≤ 1. Since height of I = d, we have Hi (F•∗ ) = 0 for
i < d and Ω = Extd (R/I, R) ֒→ Gd . Let L• be a minimal free resolution of Ω and let
ψ• : L• → F•∗ lift Ω ֒→ Gd . Then ψd (Ld ) = R; for otherwise in the minimal free resolution
P• of Gd+1 obtained from the mapping cone of ψ• , Pd+1 would contain a copy of R = L∗0
as a summand. Let I = (y1 , . . . , ys ) where s = ℓ(TorR
1 (k, R/I)). Since height of I = d and
φ∗1 (1) = (y1 , . . . , ys ), this would contradict the order ideal conjecture. Hence ψd (Ld ) = R.
This implies, by a previous observation, that Syzd (Ω) has a free summand.
Corollary. Let (R, m) be a equicharacteristic regular local ring and let I be an ideal of R
of codimension d. Let Ω denote the canonical module of R/I. Then Syzd (Ω) has a free
summand.
Remark. The above assertion is also valid in the graded equicharacteristic case via the
same mode of proof.
Our next theorem describe the cases where we are at present able to prove that Syzd (Ω)
possesses a free summand.
Theorem. Let (R, m, k) be a regular local ring in mixed characteristic p > 0 and let I
be an ideal of height d in R. Let x denote the ideal generated by a maximal R-sequence
contained in I and Let Ω = HomR (R/I, R/x) denote the canonical module of R/I. Then
R
d
TorR
d (Ω, k) → Tord (R/x, k) is non-zero (equivalently Syz (Ω) possesses a free summand)
in the following cases: 1) Ω is S3 and 2) the mixed characteristic p is a non-zero-divisor
on Extd+1 (R/I, R).
Proof. Let (F• , φ• ) :→ Fd → Fd−1 → · · · → F1 → R → 0 denote a minimal free resolution
φ∗
1
∗
F1∗ → · · · → Fd∗ → Fd+1
→
of R/I over R. Let F•∗ denote the complex: 0 → R −−→
∗
→ 0. Let Gd+i = Coker φ∗d+i , for 0 ≤ i ≤ 2. We have following short exact sequences
Fd+2
for 0 ≤ i ≤ 2:
0 → Extd+i (R/I, R) → Gd+i → Im φ∗d+i+1 → 0.
Let F•′ denote the complex F•∗ truncated at the dth spot i.e. H0 (F•′ ) = Gd . Since height
of I = d, F•′ is a minimal free resolution of Gd . Let L• be a minimal free resolution of Ω
and let ψ• : L• → F•′ denote a lift of the inclusion Ω = Extd (R/I, R) ֒→ Gd .
12
Claim. Suppose that either Ω is S3 or p is a non-zero-divisor on Extd+1
R (R/I, R). Then
ψd (Ld ) = R.
Proof of the Claim. If ψd (Ld ) 6= R, then in the minimal free resolution P• of Gd+1 extracted from the mapping cone of ψ• , Pd+1 would contain the copy of R = F0′ as a
free summand. Let I = (y1 , . . . , yr1 ) where r1 = TorR
1 (R/I, k). Since height of I = d
and φ∗1 (1) = (y1 , . . . , yr1 ), this would imply that Syzd+1 (Gd+1 ) does not satisfy (0). Let
S = R/x; then Ω = ExtdR (R/I, R) = HomS (R/I, S). If Ω is S3 , then Ext1S (R/I, S) = 0,
∗
i.e. Extd+1 (R/I, R) = 0 and Hence Gd+1 ≃ Im φ∗d+2 ֒→ Fd+2
. Thus p is a non-zero-divisor
on Gd+1 . Let R = R/pR and Gd+1 = Gd+1 /pGd+1 . Since Gd+1 has finite projective
dimension over R and R is equicharacteristic local ring, Syzd+1 (Gd+1 ) must satisfy (0) by
the order ideal theorem. This leads to a contradiction and hence ψd (Ld ) = R. If p is a
non-zero-divisor on Extd+1 (R/I, R), then p is a non-zero-divisor on Gd+1 . Hence, arguing
in a similar way as above, it follows that ψd (Ld ) = R also in this case.
Let θ• : K• (x; R) → F• denote a lift of R/x → R/I. Dualizing θ• and combining the
diagram corresponding to θ•∗ with the same corresponding to ψ• we get our required result.
1.7. Finally we point out a sufficient condition for the assertion in the above theorem to
be valid in a more general set-up.
Proposition. Let (R, m) be a local ring of dimension n and let x1 , . . . , xd ∈ m form an
R-sequence. Let λ be a zero-divisor and not a parameter on R/x, x = the ideal generated
by x1 , . . . , xd and let Ω = Hom(R/(x, λ), R/x). Let Ω′ be a lift of Ω in R via the surjection
R → R/x. Let K• = K• (x; R; β• ) and (L• , γ• ) denote the Koszul complex corresponding
to x1 , . . . , xd and a minimal free resolution of Ω respectively. Let φ• : L• → K• denote a
lift of Ω ֒→ R/x. If at least one of x1 , . . . , xd is contained in mΩ′ , then φd (Ld ) = R.
Proof. Let R = R/x1 R, L• = L• ⊗ R and K • = K• (x; R) ⊗ R. Then H1 (L• ) = Ω,
Hi (L• ) = 0 for i > 1 and H1 (K • ) = R/x = R/x and Hi (K • ) = 0 for i > 1. We have a
canonical surjection η• (= (ηi ), i ≥ 1) : K • (+1) → K• (x2 , . . . , xd ; R) such that η1 induces
the identity map on H1 (K • ) to R/x = H0 (K• (x2 , . . . , xd ; R)). Let F• denote a minimal
free resolution of Ω over R and let θ• (= (θi )i≥0 ) : F• → L• (+1) lift the natural inclusion
Ω = H1 (L• ) ֒→ Coker γ 2 . Then η• φ• θ• : F• → K• (x2 , . . . , xd ; R) lifts the natural inclusion
13
Ω ֒→ R/x over R. If ηd φd θd−1 (Fd−1 ) = R, then it follows that φd (Ld ) = R. Hence by
induction on d it is enough to consider d = 1 and x = xd is contained in mΩ′ .
Let µ1 , . . . , µh denote a minimal set of generators of Ω′ over R. Since x ∈ mΩ′ , there
h
P
exists a1 , . . . , ah ∈ m such that x =
a i µi .
i=1
Consider the commutative diagram
0
0
−→ Syz1 (Ω) −→
yφ1
−→ R
x
Rh −→ Ω
∩
yφ0
y
−→ R
where φ0 (ei ) = µi , 1 ≤ i ≤ h. Since x =
P
−→ 0
−→ R/xR −→ 0
ai µi , the element α = (a1 , . . . , ah ) ∈ Syz1 (Ω)
is such that φ0 (α) = x. Hence φ1 (Syz1 (Ω)) = R and our proof is complete.
14
References
[A-Br]
[Bh]
[Br-H]
M. Auslander and M. Bridger, Stable Module Theory, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1969).
B. Bhatt, Almost direct summands, Preprint on ArXiv:1109, 0356(2011)..
W. Bruns and J. Herzog, Cohen-Macaulay Rings, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 39, Cambridge
Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993.
[D1]
S. P. Dutta, On the canonical element conjecture, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 299 (1987), 803–811.
[D2]
S. P. Dutta, Syzygies and homological conjectures, Commutative Algebra, MSRI Publications.
15 (1989), 139–156.
[D3]
, Dualizing complex and the canonical element conjecture, J. London Math. Soc. 50
(1994), no. 2, 477–487.
, Dualizing complex and the canonical element conjecture, II, J. London Math. Soc. 2
[D4]
(1997), no. 56, 46–63.
, A note on the monomial conjecture, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350 (1998), 2871–2878.
[D5]
[D6]
, Splitting of local cohomology of syzygies of the residue field, J. Algebra 244 (2001),
168–185.
[D7]
, A connection between two sets of conjectures, The Mathematics Student, Special Centenary Volume of the Indian Mathematical Society (2007), 79–88.
[D-G]
S. P. Dutta & P. Griffith, Intersection multiplicities, the canonical element conjecture and the
syzygy problem, Michigan Math J. 57 (2008), 227–247.
[E-G1]
E. G. Evans and P. Griffith, The syzygy problem, Ann. of Math. 114 (1981), no. 2, 323–333.
, Order ideals, in M. Hochster, J. D. Sally, and C. Huneke (eds.), Commutative Algebra,
[E-G2]
Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 15, Springer (1989), 213–225.
[E-G3]
, A Graded Syzygy Theorem in mixed characteristic, Math. Research Letters 8 (2001),
605–611.
[Go]
S. Goto, On the associated graded rings of parameter ideals in Buchsbaum rings, J. Algebra 85
(1983), 490–534.
[He]
R. Heitmann, The direct summand conjecture in dimension three, Ann. of Math. 156 (2002),
no. 2, 695–712.
[Ho1]
M. Hochster, Contracted ideals from integral extensions of regular rings, Nagoya Math. J. 51
(1973), 25–43.
[Ho2]
, Topics in the homological theory of modules over commutative rings, CBMS Reg. Conf.
Ser. Math. 24, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1975.
[Ho3]
, Canonical elements in local cohomology modules and the direct summand conjecture,
J. Algebra 84 (1983), 503–553.
[K]
Jee Koh, Degree p extensions of an unmixed regular local ring of mixed characteristic p, J.
Algebra 99 (1986), 310–323.
[O]
T. Ohi, Direct summand conjecture and descent of flatness, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124 (1996),
no. 7, 1967–1968.
[P-S1]
C. Peskine and L. Szpiro, Dimension projective finie et cohomologie locale, Inst. Hautes Études
Sci. Publ. Math. 42 (1973), 49–119.
[Ro1]
P. Roberts, Two applications of dualizing complexes over local rings, Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Sup.
4e Sés t.9 (1976), 103–106.
[Ro2]
, Le Théorème d’ intersection, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér I Math. 304 (1987), 177–180.
[Str-Stü] J. R. Strooker and J. Stückrad, Monomial conjecture and complete intersections, Manuscripta
Math. 79 (1993), 153–159.
[V]
J. Valez, Splitting results in module-finite extension rings and Koh’s Conjecture, J. Algebra
172 (1995), 454–469.
Department of Mathematics
University of Illinois
15
1409 West Green Street
Urbana, IL 61801
U.S.A.
e-mail: [email protected]
16
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1710.10753v2 [cs.MA] 21 Nov 2017
Computational Social Choice and Computational Complexity:
BFFs?∗
Lane A. Hemaspaandra
Department of Computer Science
University of Rochester
Rochester, NY 14627, USA
October 30, 2017; revised November 21, 2017
Abstract
We discuss the connection between computational social choice (comsoc) and computational complexity. We stress the work so far on, and urge continued focus on, two
less-recognized aspects of this connection. Firstly, this is very much a two-way street:
Everyone knows complexity classification is used in comsoc, but we also highlight benefits to complexity that have arisen from its use in comsoc. Secondly, more subtle,
less-known complexity tools often can be very productively used in comsoc.
1
Introduction
Even in a work context, friendship is amazingly powerful. We all know how valuable it is
to have collaborators who have each other’s backs: working closely toward a shared project
goal yet each bringing their own skills and perspective to the project, to seek to reach
insights and advances that neither researcher could have achieved alone.
Research areas can be like that too. Computational social choice (henceforward,
comsoc)—which brings a computational-cost lens to such social-choice issues as preference
aggregation/elections/manipulation/fair division—certainly has roots tracing far back; but
comsoc’s existence as a recognized, distinctive research area within AI/multiagent-systems
is quite recent. Despite that, its growth as an area during these recent years has been explosive, and we suggest that a synergy between comsoc and complexity has been partially
responsible for that growth. At the 2017 AAMAS conference [LWDD17], for example, there
were four sessions devoted to Computational Social Choice; no other topic had that many
sessions. Those four sessions included 21 papers, and of those 21, 7 had the word “complexity” in their titles although in the entire conference only two other papers had the word
complexity in their titles. In contrast, at the 2003 AAMAS conference [RWSY03], the string
∗
A version of this paper will appear in AAAI-2018 [Hem18].
1
“social choice” does not even appear in the ACM Digital Library online table of contents;
neither does the string “election” or any form of the word “vote,” and only three papers in
the entire conference have the word “complexity” in their titles.
One thing that those numbers are reflecting is the fact that comsoc and complexity have
worked together very well. Comsoc research, from the seminal work of Bartholdi, Orlin,
Tovey, and Trick [BTT89b, BTT89a, BO91, BTT92] onward, has done an enviably skilled
job of interestingly employing complexity classification—which admittedly has strengths
and weaknesses, both in its theory and in its application—to reveal a subtle and varied
landscape as to what is difficult and what is hard, and how small changes in problems and
models can induce seismic changes in complexity.
Yet this article’s primary goal is not to praise that praiseworthy achievement. It is to
recognize two more subtle things that have already happened, but that we think need to
be recognized for what they are, and what more can be done.
Firstly, the comsoc/computational complexity friendship is truly a two-way street. Although everyone knows that complexity classification is widely used in comsoc research, we
will stress a direction that is not well-recognized within the AI community or the complexity
community: Research in comsoc has often been of great benefit to complexity theory. In particular, complexity classification within comsoc has populated key complexity classes with
problems that are undeniably natural and compelling. Why is that important? Complexity
theorists like creating complexity classes that capture computational capabilities/resources
that seem natural and compelling to the complexity theorists. But if those classes then
turn out, for example, to have no natural complete problems, it is like hosting a party and
having no one show up. It could even make one wonder whether the classes really were
important at all. So complexity owes quite a debt to comsoc, for bringing parties to life.
In addition to stressing the two-way street aspect of the comsoc/computational complexity friendship, we will also point out how rather subtle, lesser-known complexity notions and
machinery have in the comsoc world found fertile ground to actually do important things.
Complexity notions ranging from search-versus-decision issues to one-to-one reductions to
the join operator have arguably been used in the comsoc world in more natural and more
satisfying ways than they have been used within complexity theory itself.
We present four different issues where the work in comsoc exemplifies one or both of
these themes: comsoc work helping complexity, and lesser-known complexity notions and
machinery being used to address comsoc issues. We will particularly stress examples that
fall in the area of the complexity of elections/voting, probably the most intense current focus
of comsoc and a remarkably challenging, interesting, nuanced area (for a general survey of
comsoc see the excellent articles by Chevaleyre et al. [CELM07] and Brandt, Conitzer,
and Endriss [BCE13], and for surveys of elections/voting within comsoc see the surveys by
Faliszewski et al. [FHHR09], Faliszewski, Hemaspaandra, and Hemaspaandra [FHH10], and
Faliszewski and Procaccia [FP10]; and for additional accessible surveys, see the relevant
chapters in the important recent textbook edited by Rothe [Rot16]). This article gives just
a few examples of these themes, but we try to discuss each of those with some context and
care, and in two places our examples will connect complexity with other important AI areas,
2
planning and SAT solvers, once with the comsoc/complexity connection growing from the
other AI area and once with it creating an opportunity within the other AI area.
Then in the conclusion we will suggest that the two themes we have been stressing and
the work to date on them make clear that comsoc experts and complexity experts working
more closely and extendedly together will be to the benefit of both fields.
2
Make It a Party: Populating Lonely Complexity Classes
As mentioned above, complexity classes are typically defined to capture a certain
mode/power/model of computing. For example, the important probabilistic complexity
class BPP [Gil77], bounded probabilistic polynomial time, is the class of those sets A for
which there is a probabilistic polynomial-time Turing machine that on each input agrees
with A with probability at least 75% (or 51%, or 99%; all three of those turn out to define the same class). The class NP is the class of those sets accepted by nondeterministic
polynomial-time Turing machines. The class UP [Val76], unambiguous polynomial time,
is the class of those sets A accepted by nondeterministic polynomial-time Turing machines
whose acceptance is always unambiguous; for inputs not in A the machine has no accepting computation paths, and for each input in A, the machine has exactly one accepting
computation path (in the lingo, “has a unique succinct certificate”).
This section will present a few examples of classes that were not wildly filled with natural
sets that seem to capture their nature, yet comsoc provided new, or even the first, such
examples. By “capture the nature” of a class, in the dream case we would mean “is complete
for the class,” i.e., our set is in the class and has the property that each set in the class
many-one reduces to our set. But if that can’t be achieved, finding a set that falls into a
given class and does not seem to fall into any smaller class is the natural fallback step to
take.
Even readers not very familiar with complexity theory may know that there are thousands of known NP-complete problems and indeed a whole book is devoted to such problems [GJ79]; and that there is an entire book devoted even to problems complete for P,
with respect to the natural completeness type there [GHR95]; and that even for the levels
NP
of the polynomial hierarchy beyond NP and coNP, such as NPNP , coNPNP , NPNP , and
NP
coNPNP , there exists a detailed compendium [SU02]. And from that it would be easy
to conclude that it is boring and easy to find natural problems complete for virtually any
natural complexity class.
But that seems not to be so. For example, NP ∩ coNP (the class of sets that have
succinct, easily-checkable proofs both of membership and nonmembership) and two of the
classes mentioned above, BPP and UP, are not known to have even one complete set—not a
natural one, and not even an unnatural one [Sip82, HH88]. In fact, the just-cited papers and
the work of Regan [Reg89] in effect are showing that the existence of a complete set for one
of these classes would have sweeping consequences for our understanding of the class: that
the issue of whether each of these classes has a complete set is in fact a disguised version of
the question of whether there exists a nice enumeration of machines that precisely covers
3
the class, i.e., that provides what Regan calls a “constructive programming system.” But
things are worse still. It is now know that not only do these classes seem to lack complete
sets, but in fact, it is plausible that—indeed there are black boxes (aka oracles) relative to
which—even far larger classes than the given class do not contain even a single set that is
many-one hard, or indeed even Turing hard, for the class [HJV93].
So it is not at all a sure thing that important classes—and BPP is undeniably important,
since some would even argue that BPP rather than P should be the working definition of
feasibility—have complete sets at all, much less natural complete sets.
And yet some classes that had remained largely or wholly unpopulated by natural sets
needing the class’s power have had natural examples provided by problems from comsoc,
and other less empty but far from crowded classes have also turned out to be what pinpoints
the complexity of important comsoc problems.
2.1
Θp2 : Parallel Access to NP
Probably the most striking such example is the Θp2 level of the polynomial hierarchy. This
class was introduced by Papadimitriou and Zachos [PZ83], and is the class of sets that
can be accepted by polynomial-time machines allowed to make O(log n) sequential queries
to an NP oracle; NP ∪ coNP ⊆ Θp2 ⊆ PNP . Perhaps more naturally, Θp2 is known to be
the class of sets that can be accepted by polynomial-time machines allowed to make (an
unlimited number of) nonadaptive (i.e., parallel) queries to an NP oracle [Hem89]. For
example, consider the language, ParitySAT, that accepts its input exactly if the input is a
list of Boolean formulas and the number of them that is satisfiable is itself an odd number.
ParitySAT is clearly in Θp2 , since the polynomial-time machine can in parallel ask its oracle
about the membership in SAT of each of its input formulas, and then can see whether the
number that are satisfiable is odd. We will come back in a moment to the unnaturalness of
this example and the search for natural examples.
Θp2 is a very important class in complexity theory. Briefly put, it has a large number of
equivalent characterizations that are quite natural, e.g., it is the class of sets that can be
accepted by logspace machines allowed to make an unlimited number of adaptive queries
to an NP oracle [Wag90]; it is the class the polynomial hierarchy naturally is shown to
collapse to if there are sparse (i.e., having at most a polynomial number of strings at each
length) NP-Turing-complete sets [Kad89]; and its relationship to PNP is known to completely characterize whether conversations with NP oracles can manufacture time-bounded
randomness [HW91].
This at first sounds like quite a party, if one focuses on the results Θp2 is central to. But
wait. Even when all these results were known, the class was not known to have even one
natural complete set. It was known to have a large number of rather unnatural complete
sets all having to do with counting the parity of items, e.g., the ParitySAT example given
above about telling whether out of a collection of Boolean formulas an odd number of them
are satisfiable is known to be complete for Θp2 [Wag87].
So in fact, as to known natural complete sets, the party was at that time a (complexitytheoretically important but) empty room. However, comsoc put first one and then many
4
people into that room. In particular, Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll) in the
year 1876 had defined a fascinating election system [Dod76]. He was motivated by the idea
that it would be nice for an election system to ensure that (a) if (relative to the votes, which
are assumed to each be a tie-free total ordering of the candidates) there is a candidate—
what is known as a Condorcet winner [Con85]—who is preferred in head-on-head contests
against each other candidate, then that candidate is chosen the winner, and (b) otherwise,
each candidate who is “closest” to being such a winner (in the sense that the number of
adjacent exchanges in preference orders needed to make it become a Condorcet winner is
the lowest among the candidates) is named a winner. And Dodgson’s system then does
just that: It counts distance from being a Condorcet winner, and the candidate(s) with the
lowest distance wins. In doing that, Dodgson was in the 1800s already using the notation
that in modern computer science is central and known as an edit distance.
Although Dodgson’s system is mathematically very well defined, one of the seminal
papers of comsoc showed that the computational complexity of implementing his system is
not low. In particular, Bartholdi, Tovey, and Trick [BTT89b] showed that it is NP-hard
to tell if a given candidate wins such an election. They left open whether the problem is
NP-complete, but eight years later the problem was proven to be complete for Θp2 [HHR97a].
Θp2 -complete problems cannot be NP-complete unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to
NP ∩ coNP, and thus the winner problem for Dodgson elections is highly unlikely to be
NP-complete.
But the most important thing to note here is that the complexity of winner-testing for
Dodgson elections is not a problem that was rigged to provide a Θp2 -complete set. The
election system was defined in the 1800s for its own interest and importance, long before
NP was ever dreamed of, much less Θp2 . This problem—from comsoc—thus provides an
extremely natural Θp2 -complete set.
This result sparked interest in whether other problems in comsoc and beyond might
also be Θp2 -complete. And the floodgates opened. Other important election systems such as
those of Kemeny and Young were proven to also be Θp2 -complete [HSV05, RSV03]. General
tools were extracted from this approach to try to make it easier to prove such results [SV00],
Θp2 -completeness was shown to capture the complexity of how well certain greedy algorithms
do [HR98], and a survey was written looking at the meaning of improving from NP-hardness
results to Θp2 -completeness results [HHR97b]. Even in the quite different field of automata
theory, Θp2 -complete problems were found to capture important, natural notions [HM00].
Briefly put, the party was very much on!
2.2
NPPP and Other Classes
There are many other classes that comsoc and other work within AI have helped populate. One of the most striking examples is the class NPPP , i.e., the sets solvable by
nondeterministic polynomial-time Turing machines given access to (their choice of a) set
from PP (probabilistic polynomial time, the class of sets for which there is a probabilistic
polynomial-time Turing machine that on each input is correct with probability greater than
50%). NPPP is a class of great complexity, and it is not always easy to work with. In terms
5
of descriptive generality and its “location,” Toda’s [Tod91] Theorem says that PPP contains
not just the polynomial hierarchy (PH) but even PPPH . So NPPP contains both of those
PH
and even NPPP , while being itself contained in PSPACE.
It was only in the late 1990s that people started finding natural complete sets for NPPP ,
and that work came not from complexity issues but from an AI domain, the study of
planning and decision processes. There are a number of papers on this and we won’t here
cite them all, but we mention as a pointer the very impressive work of Goldsmith, Littman,
and Mundhenk [LGM98], which shows versions of both the plan-existence problem and the
plan-evaluation problem are, for partially ordered plans, NPPP -complete, and of Mundhenk
et al. [MGLA00] on Markov decision processes, which also yields natural NPPP -complete
problems.
Comsoc also has helped populate that party. Although currently its NPPP results are
upper bounds—and we commend to the reader the open issue of either proving completeness
or of lowering the upper bound—the beautiful work of Mattei, Goldsmith, Klapper, and
Mundhenk [MGKM15] shows that NPPP plays an important role in the study of bribery
and manipulation in tournaments of uncertain information, by showing that many such
problems are in NPPP .1
There are many other parties, some admittedly not so previously poorly attended as
those thrown by Θp2 and NPPP , where comsoc has provided attendees. Here are just a
few examples. Nguyen et al. [NNRR14] gave the class DP (all sets that are the symmetric
difference of two NP sets) a wide range of new complete sets having to do with social welfare
optimization in multiagent resource allocation. The first PNP[1] -completeness result in social
choice (which also is perhaps the first natural completeness result anywhere for PNP[1] ) and
the first PNP -completeness result in social choice both come from a study of the complexity
of weighted coalitional manipulation of elections, under the voting system, Veto, where each
voter vetos one candidate and whoever has the fewest vetos wins; in an online setting (what
in political science is called a roll-call vote), the winner problem here is PNP[1] -complete
for 3 candidates and is PNP -complete for 4 or more candidates [HHR14]. Filos-Ratsikas
and Goldberg [FG17] have recently proven a natural cake-cutting-related problem to be
complete for the lonely class PPA. And a huge number of papers in comsoc contribute
1
After doing that, that paper comments that “we have actually shown these problems are in NPPP[1] ,”
which is the class in which the NP machine is allowed at most one query per path to the PP oracle. Simply
so that comment in the paper doesn’t lead any reader of the present paper to think that NPPP -completeness
for that paper’s problems is unlikely due to that paper having achieved the seemingly better upper bound
of NPPP[1] , we claim that in fact NPPP[1] = NPPP . Let us prove that claim. NPPP[1] = NPPP holds via
altering the NP machine of NPPP to instead guess the answer to each PP query (without asking the query)
and then via a single truth-table (parallel) query round to PP checking that all its guesses were correct,
and if a given path would have accepted if its guesses of the answers were correct and that path finds via
its truth-table-round access to PP that it guessed correctly, then that path accepts. That as just stated
is illegally overly using the PP oracle. But since PP is closed under truth-table reductions [FR96], the
truth-table round can be replaced with a single query, and thus we indeed have establishing the claimed
class equality. Indeed, since the truth-table yields True for only one known-at-truth-table-query-time setting
of answers, even Beigel, Reingold, and Spielman [BRS95, p. 195] would suffice to allow a single query per
path.
6
natural problems—often related to manipulative attacks on elections—to other classes such
as NPNP , coNPNP , and PSPACE. Also, many counting-based issues in comsoc have been
shown to be complete for the counting analogue of NP, the class #P.
In summary, there is a two-way street of friendship between comsoc and computational
complexity. Complexity benefits since its classes—some of which played central roles in key
abstract results yet had few or no natural complete problems—are given quite compelling
natural problems based in comsoc. Comsoc in turn has benefited since the machinery of
complexity-class classification helps clarify how hard or easy many of its problems are.
3
Complexity Machinery and Notions Find Fertile Ground
in Comsoc
This section provides a tour of two cases where complexity techniques and notions have
found very fertile ground in comsoc research. Although one-to-one (Section 3.2) reductions
have been used centrally in complexity theory, in particular in the 1970s, their new use
in comsoc is both powerful and quite different than the use they had in complexity. And
in another case (Section 3.1), comsoc has given new life to lovely complexity machinery
that had been developed in 1976, and yet that even 36 years later had not found a single
application in a real-world domain.
We will cover each topic but briefly, though we will try to give a sense of how each
supports this section’s thesis that comsoc has been a fertile ground for complexity techniques
and notions, helping comsoc of course, but also in the case of little-used or narrowly used
complexity techniques helping establish the value or breadth of the techniques.
3.1
Search versus Decision for NP Problems
Everyone knows that SAT is a decision problem, and indeed that the vast majority of
complexity classes are defined in terms of decision problems, not search problems. This has
been the case for so long that it is easy to forget why this is so.
The reason why complexity is largely focused on decision problems is because for almost
all natural problems the search problem clearly polynomial-time Turing reduces (and often, for example for SAT, even “polynomial-time 2-disjunctive truth-table” reduces) to the
problem’s decision version. And so the two problems are inherently of the same complexity, give or take composition with a polynomial; it is impossible in these cases for decision
to be easy yet for search to be hard. SAT is the classic case: Given a Boolean formula,
F (v1 , v2 , . . .), it is satisfiable exactly if at least one of F (True, v2 , . . .) and F (False, v2 , . . .)
is satisfiable, so given a decision procedure for SAT, one can ask those two questions to it,
and thus find a good value for the first variable (if any exists), and then can redo the process, on the “reduced” formula, to similarly set the second variable and so on. By the end,
using as a black-box a decision procedure for SAT, one has found a satisfying assignment
in polynomial time, when one exists.
7
Are all natural NP problems so polite as to allow themselves to be fitted into this
straitjacket of linked complexities? For decades there have been hints that the answer
might be “no.” Most powerfully, in 1976 Borodin and Demers [BD76] built lovely, clever
machinery that showed that if P 6= NP∩coNP, then there exists an infinite polynomial-time
recognizable subset of SAT that has no polynomial-time search algorithm finding solutions
for its members. In brief, one could quickly determine with certainty that its members were
satisfiable, but one has no idea—it turns out not even a good setting for the first variable
of the formula—of what a satisfying assignment would be. (The reason this claim is not
precluded by the above discussion of self-reducibility is that the Borodin–Demers subset is
so pathological that it has infinitely many members such that the formulas generated at
some stage of the above self-reduction process are all not in the subset, and so the above
process is rendered invalid on the subset.)
Stunning though that result was, the fact that it was achieving its power not on all
of SAT (which is impossible), but rather on a somewhat pathological subset of SAT, kept
the result and its lovely machinery from gaining traction; it remained only as the above
1976 technical report, and did not have a conference or a journal version. The work was
likely—and in the first and second of these four examples the work is explicitly discussed—
the inspiration behind some later related work, e.g., that for unambiguous computation
the implication mentioned above becomes an “if and only if” characterization [HH88], that
under the extremely strong assumption that deterministic and nondeterministic double
exponential time differ there exists an (artificial) language in NP for which search does not
reduce to decision [BG94], that if P 6= NP then there exist NP-complete languages that are
not self-reducible [FO10], and that relative to some oracle there is a search versus decision
separation for exponential-time classes [IT89].
Nonetheless, the work found not a single application on natural problems for 36 years.
And it was comsoc that finally provided that application. In particular, Hemaspaandra,
Hemaspaandra, and Menton [HHM13] proved that of the standard types of attacks on
elections, for about half it holds that if P 6= NP ∩ coNP then there is an election system
having a polynomial-time winner problem for which the decision problem for that type
of attack is in P but the search problem cannot be solved in polynomial time. (For the
other half of the attack types, that paper proved unconditionally that search does reduce
to decision.) Note that the attack types were not created by that paper; they are the
long-standard attack types. And so the problems themselves are not tricks, but are the
natural, standard ones, and on these, search and decision are being separated under the
given complexity-theoretic assumption, which is widely believed to be true.
There are four comments which pretty compellingly need to be made at this point.
First, if P = NP ∩ coNP, then integer factoring can be done in polynomial time, and
so RSA and much of the foundation of modern computer security falls. So the above
results say that either the foundations of cryptography are deeply flawed, or the approach
taken within comsoc to defining election-attack problems—namely, they are defined in their
decision versions—is defining as tractable some problems whose search version (the issue of
finding the attack that works) is not tractable. Second, the reason this separation of search
8
and decision is possible is that, quite unexpectedly, about half of the natural election-attack
problems do not seem to be nicely self-reducible. Third, natural is in the eye of the beholder;
although the election-attack problems used in the result are the standard, natural ones, the
election systems used are indirectly specified by the hypothesized sets in (NP ∩ coNP) − P,
and so are likely not very natural. And fourth and finally, this entire approach then found
application in a different area of AI, namely, the study of backbones and backdoors of
Boolean formulas, where it was shown for example that if P 6= NP ∩ coNP, then search
versus decision separations occur for backbones [HN17a, HN17b].
3.2
Density-of-Hardness Transfer and One-to-One Reductions
When one says a problem is NP-complete, that doesn’t prove that it is hard. It just proves
that if anything in NP is hard, then that problem is hard. This is generally viewed as much
better than having nothing to say about the difficulty of the problem.
Wouldn’t it be lovely to have an analogous type of result for frequency of hardness? For
example, in Section 3.1, we discussed work showing that if P 6= NP ∩ coNP, then search
and decision separate for many key issues regarding manipulative attacks on elections and
backbones of Boolean formulas. But maybe in those examples, for which we know decision is
easy, the hardness of search may be a con: Perhaps search is only hard on a very, very, very
small portion of the inputs, asymptotically? That is, perhaps it is a worst-case separation
that doesn’t hold in the typical case.
To try to argue against that possibility, it would be wonderful if we could argue that if
even one problem A in NP ∩ coNP is hard with a certain frequency h (i.e., each polynomialtime heuristic is wrong on A’s membership problem on Ω(h(n)) strings up to length n)
then every polynomial-time heuristic for our search problem fails with almost that same
frequency, namely, for each polynomial-time heuristic there is an ǫ > 0 such that on our
given search problem it fails on Ω(h(nǫ )) of the strings up to length n).
This would say that if any set in P 6= NP ∩ coNP is frequently hard (relative to heuristic
attacks), then our search versus decision separations are not cons. After all, it is widely believed, most crucially in the cryptography community (due in part to the issue of factoring),
that there are sets in NP ∩ coNP that are frequently hard with respect to polynomial-time
heuristics. And if one believes that, then the hypothetical machinery discussed above would
immediately convert that into a claim of the frequent hardness of the created search problems whose decision problems are easy.
In fact, machinery that can do this exists, although it was developed for a completely
different purpose in the 1970s. So this is an example where comsoc—and the study of SAT
solvers—is giving a fresh use to a complexity-theoretic notion.
In particular, every CS undergraduate learns why claims of NP-completeness are crucially tied to the tool of many-one polynomial-time reductions; it is how we establish them.
In the 1970s, though, there was a sudden moment of focus in theoretical computer science on
the notion of one-to-one (aka injective) polynomial-time reductions, i.e., polynomial-time
reductions that have no collisions.
9
This moment of intense focus on one-to-one reductions came about to support one of the
great complexity goals of the 1970s: to prove that all NP-complete sets were the same set in
a transparent disguise, namely, that all NP-complete sets were polynomial-time isomorphic.
This is known as the Isomorphism Conjecture (aka the Berman–Hartmanis Isomorphism
Conjecture). To this day it remains open. However, using one-to-one reductions, in the
1970s Berman and Hartmanis [BH77] proved that all familiar NP-complete sets indeed
were polynomial-time isomorphic, which was a huge revelation. (Their insight in using
one-to-one reductions was motivated by the fact that in recursive function theory, recursive
one-to-one reductions are central to the proof that all RE-complete sets are recursively
isomorphic, a result that follows from the so-called Myhill [Myh55] Isomorphism Theorem.)
However, due to challenges such as the potential existence of one-way functions, that 1970s
result has not only never been expanded to (under the inherently required assumption that
P 6= NP) include all NP-complete sets, but indeed there is evidence that there may well exist
nonisomorphic NP-complete sets [JY85, KMR95], i.e., that the Isomorphism Conjecture
may fail.
These days in complexity theory, many-one reductions remain the standard, and oneto-one reductions are not often discussed. However, one thing that one-to-one reductions
do fiendishly well is preserve density. If one has a bunch of strings with a certain behavior,
their image when pushed through the reduction cannot possibly jumble them on top of
each other, because one-to-one reductions don’t jumble anything on top of anything else.
It is admittedly true that such reductions can leave “holes” (though injective, they need
not be surjective), and can polynomially stretch (and superpolynomially contract, though
inherently not too frequently) lengths; and that in fact is what is behind the “ǫ” mentioned
above. But one-to-one reductions by definition never have collisions.
Exploiting that, the “if anything in NP ∩ coNP is frequently hard relative to polynomialtime heuristics then our search problems are almost as frequently hard relative to
polynomial-time heuristics as those” results mentioned above are achieved by ensuring that
the entire proof structure in those papers can be made to yield polynomial-time one-to-one
reductions. (And the additional related paper mentioned earlier, which adds in results on
the case of backdoors of Boolean formulas, and has some related results about backbones
of Boolean formulas, in both cases under the weaker assumption P 6= NP, also works by
achieving polynomial-time one-to-one reductions.)
Thus, to summarize, one-to-one reductions are a tool that was briefly extremely important in complexity in the 1970s in a brilliant but even forty years later not yet successful
attempt to show that there is in effect just one NP-complete set. But comsoc—and also,
related to SAT solvers, the study of backbones and backdoors of Boolean formulas—has
brought the notion of one-to-one reductions again front-and-center, providing an “if anything in the class is frequently hard then this is frequently hard” analogue of the “if anything
in the class is hard then this is hard” argument that many-reductions have provided for
almost half a century in the case of NP-complete sets.
This case makes very clear the two-way street that exists between complexity and comsoc
(and also the study of SAT solvers). Complexity benefits in that one of its notions that
10
was a bit covered in cobwebs turned out to yield important frequency-of-hardness results
in comsoc, and also relatedly in the study of SAT solvers. And comsoc benefits in that it
now has these results, which are quite powerful evidence that the hardness of search that
these speak of is in fact not some con job that happens only extremely infrequently.
4
Conclusions
We have discussed just a few of the rich collection of interactions between comsoc and computational complexity. Many others—from how the complexity-theoretic join operation allows proofs in comsoc of the impossibility of proving certain impossibility theorems [HHR09]
to how work on online control gives an unexpected new quantifier-alternation characterization of the class coNP [HHR17] to the rich interactions with approximation (see as just
one of many examples [FST17]) to the power of dichotomy results to the insights given
by parameterized complexity (both these last are on view simultaneously, for example, in
[DMN17]) to much more—are not even touched on here.
What are the take-aways? The benefits of the friendship between comsoc and computational complexity are a two-way street; both comsoc and complexity have benefited.
Classes from complexity have been populated, cobweb-covered techniques have been given
surprising new life, and interesting results have been obtained in comsoc from the use of
those classes and techniques. In light of this, we urge researchers in comsoc and complexity
to reach out and work with each other more and more, for the benefit of both fields. And
we hope that more Ph.D. programs will encourage and create young researchers who are
trained in and simultaneously expert in both areas; that will allow advances far beyond even
those that so far have come from this wonderful synergy between areas.
Let us hope that the areas become best friends forever.
Acknowledgments
Warm thanks to the anonymous AAAI-18 reviewers, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, and Paul Goldberg
for helpful comments.
References
[BCE13]
F. Brandt, V. Conitzer, and U. Endriss. Computational social choice. In
G. Weiss, editor, Multiagent Systems, pages 213–284. MIT Press, 2nd edition,
2013.
[BD76]
A. Borodin and A. Demers. Some comments on functional self-reducibility and
the NP hierarchy. Technical Report TR 76-284, Dept. of Computer Science,
Cornell University, July 1976.
[BG94]
M. Bellare and S. Goldwasser. The complexity of decision versus search. SIAM
Journal on Computing, 23(1):97–119, 1994.
11
[BH77]
L. Berman and J. Hartmanis. On isomorphisms and density of NP and other
complete sets. SIAM Journal on Computing, 6(2):305–322, 1977.
[BO91]
J. Bartholdi, III and J. Orlin. Single transferable vote resists strategic voting.
Social Choice and Welfare, 8(4):341–354, 1991.
[BRS95]
R. Beigel, N. Reingold, and D. Spielman. PP is closed under intersection.
Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 50(2):191–202, 1995.
[BTT89a]
J. Bartholdi, III, C. Tovey, and M. Trick. The computational difficulty of
manipulating an election. Social Choice and Welfare, 6(3):227–241, 1989.
[BTT89b]
J. Bartholdi, III, C. Tovey, and M. Trick. Voting schemes for which it can be
difficult to tell who won the election. Social Choice and Welfare, 6(2):157–165,
1989.
[BTT92]
J. Bartholdi, III, C. Tovey, and M. Trick. How hard is it to control an election?
Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 16(8/9):27–40, 1992.
[CELM07] Y. Chevaleyre, U. Endriss, J. Lang, and N. Maudet. A short introduction to
computational social choice. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, pages
51–69. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science #4362, January
2007.
[Con85]
J.-A.-N. de Caritat, Marquis de Condorcet. Essai sur l’Application de
L’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix. 1785.
Facsimile reprint of original published in Paris, 1972, by the Imprimerie Royale.
[DMN17]
P. Dey, N. Misra, and Y. Narahari. Parameterized dichotomy of choosing
committees based on approval votes in the presence of outliers. In Proceedings
of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent
Systems, pages 42–50, May 2017.
[Dod76]
C. Dodgson. A method of taking votes on more than two issues. Pamphlet
printed by the Clarendon Press, Oxford, and headed “not yet published”, 1876.
[FG17]
A. Filos-Ratsikas and P. Goldberg. Consensus Halving is PPA-complete.
Technical Report arXiv:1711.04503 [cs.CC], Computing Research Repository,
arXiv.org/corr/, November 2017.
[FHH10]
P. Faliszewski, E. Hemaspaandra, and L. Hemaspaandra. Using complexity to
protect elections. Communications of the ACM, 53(11):74–82, 2010.
[FHHR09]
P. Faliszewski, E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and J. Rothe. A richer
understanding of the complexity of election systems. In S. Ravi and S. Shukla,
editors, Fundamental Problems in Computing, pages 375–406. Springer, 2009.
12
[FO10]
P. Faliszewski and M. Ogihara. On the autoreducibility of functions. Theory
of Computing Systems, 46(2):222–245, 2010.
[FP10]
P. Faliszewski and A. Procaccia. AI’s war on manipulation: Are we winning?
AI Magazine, 31(4):53–64, 2010.
[FR96]
L. Fortnow and N. Reingold. PP is closed under truth-table reductions. Information and Computation, 124(1):1–6, 1996.
[FST17]
P. Faliszewski, P. Skowron, and N. Talmon. Bribery as a measure of candidate success: Complexity results for approval-based multiwinner rules. In
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and
Multiagent Systems, pages 6–14, May 2017.
[GHR95]
R. Greenlaw, H. Hoover, and W. Ruzzo. Limits to Parallel Computation: PCompleteness Theory. Oxford University Press, 1995.
[Gil77]
J. Gill. Computational complexity of probabilistic Turing machines. SIAM
Journal on Computing, 6(4):675–695, 1977.
[GJ79]
M. Garey and D. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the
Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman, 1979.
[Hem89]
L. Hemachandra. The strong exponential hierarchy collapses. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 39(3):299–322, 1989.
[Hem18]
L. Hemaspaandra. Computational social choice and computational complexity:
BFFs? In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
AAAI Press, February 2018. To appear.
[HH88]
J. Hartmanis and L. Hemachandra. Complexity classes without machines: On
complete languages for UP. Theoretical Computer Science, 58(1–3):129–142,
1988.
[HHM13]
E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and C. Menton. Search versus decision for
election manipulation problems. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Symposium
on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pages 377–388, 2013.
[HHR97a]
E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and J. Rothe. Exact analysis of Dodgson
elections: Lewis Carroll’s 1876 voting system is complete for parallel access to
NP. Journal of the ACM, 44(6):806–825, 1997.
[HHR97b]
E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and J. Rothe. Raising NP lower bounds
to parallel NP lower bounds. SIGACT News, 28(2):2–13, 1997.
[HHR09]
E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and J. Rothe. Hybrid elections broaden
complexity-theoretic resistance to control. Mathematical Logic Quarterly,
55(4):397–424, 2009.
13
[HHR14]
E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and J. Rothe. The complexity of online
manipulation of sequential elections. Journal of Computer and System Sciences,
80(4):697–710, 2014.
[HHR17]
E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and J. Rothe. Online voter control in
sequential elections. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 31(5):1055–
1076, May 2017.
[HJV93]
L. Hemaspaandra, S. Jain, and N. Vereshchagin. Banishing robust Turing completeness. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 4(3):245–
265, 1993.
[HM00]
M. Holzer and P. McKenzie. Alternating and empty alternating auxiliary stack
automata. In Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, pages 415–425. Springer-Verlag Lecture
Notes in Computer Science #1893, August/September 2000.
[HN17a]
L. Hemaspaandra and D. Narváez. The opacity of backbones. In Proceedings of
the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 3900–3906. AAAI
Press, February 2017.
[HN17b]
L. Hemaspaandra and D. Narváez. The opacity of backbones and backdoors under a weak assumption. Technical Report arXiv:1706.04582 [cs.AI], Computing
Research Repository, arXiv.org/corr/, June 2017.
[HR98]
E. Hemaspaandra and J. Rothe. Recognizing when greed can approximate
maximum independent sets is complete for parallel access to NP. Information
Processing Letters, 65(3):151–156, 1998.
[HSV05]
E. Hemaspaandra, H. Spakowski, and J. Vogel. The complexity of Kemeny
elections. Theoretical Computer Science, 349(3):382–391, 2005.
[HW91]
L. Hemachandra and G. Wechsung. Kolmogorov characterizations of complexity classes. Theoretical Computer Science, 83:313–322, 1991.
[IT89]
R. Impagliazzo and G. Tardos. Decision versus search problems in superpolynomial time. In Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Symposium on Foundations
of Computer Science, pages 222–227. IEEE Computer Society Press, October/November 1989.
[JY85]
D. Joseph and P. Young. Some remarks on witness functions for non-polynomial
and non-complete sets in NP. Theoretical Computer Science, 39(2–3):225–237,
1985.
[Kad89]
J. Kadin. PNP[log n] and sparse Turing-complete sets for NP. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 39(3):282–298, 1989.
14
[KMR95]
S. Kurtz, S. Mahaney, and J. Royer. The Isomorphism Conjecture fails relative
to a random oracle. Journal of the ACM, 42(2):401–420, 1995.
[LGM98]
M. Littman, J. Goldsmith, and M. Mundhenk. The computational complexity
of probabilistic planning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 9:1–36,
1998.
[LWDD17] K. Larson, M. Winikoff, S. Das, and E. Durfee, editors. Proceedings of the
16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems,
AAMAS 2017, São Paulo, Brazil, May 8–12, 2017. International Foundation
for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2017.
[MGKM15] N. Mattei, J. Goldsmith, A. Klapper, and M. Mundhenk. On the complexity of
bribery and manipulation in tournaments with uncertain information. Journal
of Applied Logic, 13(4, Part 2):557–581, 2015.
[MGLA00] M. Mundhenk, J. Goldsmith, C. Lusena, and E. Allender. Complexity of finitehorizon Markov decision process problems. Journal of the ACM, 47(4):681–720,
July 2000.
[Myh55]
J. Myhill. Creative sets. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen
der Mathematik, 1:97–108, 1955.
[NNRR14] N. Nguyen, T. Nguyen, M. Roos, and J. Rothe. Computational complexity and
approximability of social welfare optimization in multiagent resource allocation.
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 28(2):256–289, 2014.
[PZ83]
C. Papadimitriou and S. Zachos. Two remarks on the power of counting. In
Proceedings of the 6th GI Conference on Theoretical Computer Science, pages
269–276. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science #145, January
1983.
[Reg89]
K. Regan.
Provable complexity properties and constructive reasoning.
Manuscript, April 1989.
[Rot16]
J. Rothe, editor. Economics and Computation: An Introduction to Algorithmic
Game Theory, Computational Social Choice, and Fair Division. Springer, 2016.
[RSV03]
J. Rothe, H. Spakowski, and J. Vogel. Exact complexity of the winner problem
for Young elections. Theory of Computing Systems, 36(4):375–386, 2003.
[RWSY03] J. Rosenschein, M. Wooldridge, T. Sandholm, and M. Yokoo, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents
and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2003, Melbourne, Australia, June 14–18,
2003. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2003.
15
[Sip82]
M. Sipser. On relativization and the existence of complete sets. In Proceedings of the 9th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, pages 523–531. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science
#140, July 1982.
[SU02]
M. Schaefer and C. Umans. Completeness in the polynomial-time hierarchy:
Part I: A compendium. SIGACT News, 33(3):32–49, 2002. Updated version
available online at ovid.cs.depaul.edu/documents/phcom.pdf.
[SV00]
H. Spakowski and J. Vogel. Θp2 -completeness: A classical approach for new
results. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Foundations of Software
Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, pages 348–360. Springer-Verlag
Lecture Notes in Computer Science #1974, December 2000.
[Tod91]
S. Toda. PP is as hard as the polynomial-time hierarchy. SIAM Journal on
Computing, 20(5):865–877, 1991.
[Val76]
L. Valiant. The relative complexity of checking and evaluating. Information
Processing Letters, 5(1):20–23, 1976.
[Wag87]
K. Wagner. More complicated questions about maxima and minima, and some
closures of NP. Theoretical Computer Science, 51(1–2):53–80, 1987.
[Wag90]
K. Wagner. Bounded query classes. SIAM Journal on Computing, 19(5):833–
846, 1990.
16
| 2cs.AI
|
arXiv:1404.0672v1 [cs.CE] 2 Apr 2014
Thermodynamic Hypothesis as Social Choice: An Impossibility
Theorem for Protein Folding
Hammurabi Mendes, Sorin Istrail
{hmendes,sorin}@cs.brown.edu
Brown University
Abstract
Protein Folding is concerned with the reasons and mechanism behind a protein’s tertiary
structure. The thermodynamic hypothesis of Anfinsen postulates an universal energy function
(UEF) characterizing the tertiary structure, defined consistently across proteins, in terms of
their aminoacid sequence.
We consider the approach of examining multiple protein structure descriptors in the PDB
(Protein Data Bank), and infer individual preferences, biases favoring particular classes of
aminoacid interactions in each of them, later aggregating these individual preferences into
a global preference. This 2-step process would ideally expose intrinsic biases on classes of
aminoacid interactions in the UEF itself. The intuition is that any intrinsic biases in the UEF
are expressed within each protein in a specific manner consistent with its specific aminoacid
sequence, size, and fold (consistently with Anfinsen’s thermodynamic hypothesis), making a
1-step, holistic aggregation less desirable.
Our intention is to illustrate how some impossibility results from voting theory would apply
in this setting, being possibly applicable to other protein folding problems as well. We consider
concepts and results from voting theory and unveil methodological difficulties for the approach
mentioned above. With our observations, we intend to highlight how key theoretical barriers,
already exposed by economists, can be relevant for the development of new methods, new
algorithms, for problems related to protein folding.
1
1
Introduction
The systematic aggregation of individual preferences into a global social preference is the principal concern of social choice theory. Its origins trace back to the 13th-century, when the philosopher
Ramon Lull considered a voting method that counted pairwise preferences among candidates. This
technique was later recovered by the famous 18th-century mathematicians Borda and Condorcet.
Later, in 1951, Kenneth Arrow stated his famous impossibility theorem ([3], for the version of 1963),
which is viewed as a landmark of social choice theory. This important result defines apparently
innocuous properties that certain preference aggregation functions (called social welfare functions)
should respect, but also demonstrates that such properties are conflicting.
Many other impossibility results followed. The conclusions usually result from an axiomatic
setting, where aggregation functions are modeled after axioms defining their intended behavior.
Also common is the relative unconcern for the elements subject to preferences. Many aggregation
settings, in addition, do not consider voters as players, but merely as providers of information –
and we are interested on those settings only. Note that the observations above suggest a potential
application of the impossibility results to other circumstances that involve aggregation. In this
work, we model a problem related to protein folding as an aggregation function prone to those
impossibility results, exploring the connection between these ideas.
The protein folding problem is basically interested on how and why proteins settle in particular
three-dimensional structures. The well-accepted thermodynamic hypothesis of Anfinsen [2] states
that the protein structure, informally speaking, is a unique, stable, and viable state depending solely
on aminoacid sequence. The state minimizes an energy function accounting for physiochemical
utilities. Such universal energy function (UEF) is defined consistently across proteins, in terms of
the particular aminoacid interactions that define each of them.
The protein folding literature often takes a holistic approach to analyzing the PDB [1] in order to
obtain certain conclusions from stable folds. We define a problem related to protein folding where
a 2-step aggregation process will seem more intuitive: suppose we intend to infer hypothesized
intrinsic preferences on the UEF, which would favor certain classes of aminoacid interactions over
others. The idea is to first aggregate multiple individual preferences, and later consolidate them
into a single global preference. In other words, we consider and explore the following scenario:
• Say that the UEF has an intrinsic global preference among interaction classes. For instance,
the UEF might generally favor (A, V ), the interaction of the aminoacids alanine and valine,
over (G, L), the interaction of aminoacids glycine and leucine.
• This global preference is manifested distinctly across proteins, in light of the thermodynamic
hypothesis. In other words, a protein’s stable fold implies an individual preference among
interaction classes, which results from its corresponding aminoacid sequence and the global
preference intrinsic to the UEF.
We consider the possibility of inferring or estimating the postulated global preference among
interaction classes, intrinsic to the UEF, by aggregating individual preferences, extracted separately
from multiple stable folds in the PDB. We assess and qualify aminoacid interactions inside each
protein in order to generate the individual preferences. Importantly, we assume that aminoacid
interactions are totally defined by pairwise interactions (see Sec. 2.2). The existence and expression
of a pairwise interaction depends on the aminoacids involved (their physiochemical affinities) and
their spacial arrangement (their distance and contact).
2
We particularly think that such 2-step aggregation process is particularly sensible in light of
Anfinsen’s thermodynamic hypothesis. The idea is that individual proteins may express universal
biases differently, according to their particular aminoacid sequence, size, and fold (note here the
thermodynamic hypothesis). If we holistically analyze the PDB, performing instead a 1-step aggregation process, we effectively aggregate over aminoacid interactions from multiple proteins. By
assumption, those aminoacid interactions may express biases differently. This argument might as
well be applicable to other problems related to protein folding where the thermodynamic hypothesis
is considered.
The problem formalized before is formally weaker than those aiming for more complete characterizations of the UEF with our 2-step aggregation process and the same axiomatic setting. Here,
while we do not intend to completely characterize the UEF, we do intend to identify intrinsic biases
among interaction classes in the UEF. Unfortunately, this weaker problem will still manifest an
impossibility in light of some seemingly reasonable assumptions (discussed in Sec. 2 and Sec. 4).
Stronger characterizations of the UEF via the method above will suffer from similar methodological
limitations unless axioms are relaxed, made more specific, or otherwise changed appropriately.
Our intention and contribution is to highlight theoretical impossibility results for the problem
considered above, under reasonable assumptions (see Sec. 4). We use concepts and results from
voting theory, a distinct investigation field of social choice theory, in Economics. The goal is to
sparkle interest in the profound results from voting theory, and highlight a connection of this
area with methods that, so far, have been mainly a concern of biologists, chemists, physicists,
and computer scientists. We note that the remarks made here result from a suitable axiomatic
framework, from the application of voting theory concepts, and from direct reduction to previous
results in this area. We intend to suggest how some key theoretical barriers, already exposed by
economists, can be relevant for the development of new methods, new algorithms, for problems
related to protein folding, particularly those in which the thermodynamic hypothesis is considered.
2
The Analytic Framework
In this section, we present the axioms and definitions that form our analytic framework. We
adhere to the thermodynamic principle of [2], and further assume that aminoacid interactions in the
universal energy function are totally defined by pairwise interactions. We try to abstract concepts
of purely biological nature as much as possible. Again, the purpose is to bring impossibility results
from voting theory to our 2-step preference model and suggest that they might be relevant to other
problems related to protein folding.
2.1
Thermodynamic Hypothesis
There are two principal questions in the Protein Folding research [9]. The first one concerns
the reasons why proteins settle in a specific tertiary structure. The second asks how to correctly
predict the tertiary structure given the protein’s aminoacid configuration.
The thermodynamic hypothesis [2] says that the tertiary structure results solely from aminoacid
interactions, maximizing a function of utility character and physiochemical nature. Also, the final
structure is (1) unique, as other possible states have strictly lower energy; (2) stable, as small
external changes do not disrupt the structure; and (3) viable, smoothly accessible by physiochemical
changes.
3
Axiom 2.1. The thermodynamic hypothesis of [2] is valid, hence the protein’s tertiary structure is
unique, stable, viable, and depends solely on aminoacid interactions.
2.2
Pairwise Interactions
Previous literature suggests energy functions depending on number, distance, and additional
physiochemical properties (hydrophobia/hydrophilia, among others) between pairs of aminoacids
in the three-dimensional protein structure [11, 17, 13]. We will follow such approach, hence pairwise
interactions fully characterize our aminoacid interactions in this work.
Identifying pairwise interactions instead of trying to obtain all collective, grouped interactions
is much more viable computationally. Besides, it is conceivable that more intricate interaction
patterns be extrapolated from pairwise interactions. In this work, we consider pairwise energy
functions, i.e., those totally defined by energy potentials on pairwise interactions among aminoacids.
Axiom 2.2 (Pairwise Hypothesis). All existent information on aminoacid interactions can be
obtained by considering only pairwise interactions.
2.2.1
Interaction Classes and Instances
An interaction class is a pair (X1 , X2 ) where X1 and X2 are names of aminoacids. For instance,
(A, V ) is the interaction of the aminoacids alanine and valine, and (G, L) is the interaction of
aminoacids glycine and leucine. We consider (X1 , X2 ) equal to (X2 , X1 ) for any aminoacid names
X1 , X2 . Considering the standard 20 aminoacids that characterize proteins, we have 380 possible
interactions classes.
Within a protein’s stable fold, an interaction instance of (X1 , X2 ) occurs if the distance between
two aminoacids of types X1 and X2 , is within an arbitrary threshold τ . In practice, the distance
could be taken over heavy atoms, centroids in aminoacids, or cα locations in aminoacids (the
location of the central carbon atom). Our results are independent of the choice above. We represent
interaction classes with uppercase letters (e.g. I), and interaction instances with lowercase letters
(e.g. i). In a protein’s stable fold P , the interaction instances of the interaction class I defines the
set Inst P (I).
Establishing a distance threshold might seem arbitrary and even unrealistic, as overlooking
interaction instances that barely fail such distance may discard useful information. Also, whatever
account attributed to interaction instances must also consider certain physiochemical properties,
for instance, hydrophobia or hydrophilia1 , usually compiled into tables such as the MiyazawaJernigan [13]. One could argue that the right choice of distance threshold and tables describing
physiochemical interactivity could be enough to totally define the UEF. Let us fix (yet not specify) τ
big enough as to accommodate all possible actual aminoacid interactions, and assume that contacts
are scored accordingly.
Therefore, to each interaction instance i, we associate an energetic score e(i) ∈ R, which abstracts the following parameters: (1) distance threshold τ ; (2) contact point; (3) the physiochemical
properties of the aminoacids involved. As far as identifying intrinsic preferences over interaction
classes in the UEF, our results are independent of the above choices – in other words, independent
of the energetic score function. The key to such generality of results lies in our 2-step preference
model, in our axiomatic setting, and impossibility results from voting theory.
1
Respectively, the tendency or aversion to bind to water.
4
3
Internal Aggregation
The internal aggregation is the procedure where the energetic scores of the interaction instances
are taken into account and define a protein’s individual preference. For any protein P :
• Each interaction instance i has an energetic score e(i) ∈ R modeling distance threshold,
contact point, and physiochemical properties of i. The function e() is fixed yet arbitrary.
The value of e(i) can be positive or negative, modeling physiochemical properties that might
manifest with opposing effect (for instance, hydrophobia vs. hydrophilia).
• Each interaction class I has a set of interaction instances Inst P (I). The individual preference
of P regarding I1 versus I2 depends only on Inst P (I1 ) and Inst P (I2 ), and the energetic scores
respectively associated with each interaction instance. We consider two scenarios:
1. For each interaction instance I, we can infer an utility value uP (I) ∈ R, completely
defined in terms of Inst P (I). Considering the same protein/function, the utilities are
comparable: if uP (I1 ) > uP (I2 ), then P manifests preference (i.e., bias) for I1 instead of
I2 ; if uP (I1 ) = uP (I2 ), then P does not manifest any preference (i.e., bias) for I1 instead
of I2 .
Note that we do not assume comparability between utility levels across two different
proteins. This is what characterizes our 2-step preference model: utilities are meaningful
to its corresponding protein only. In Sec. 4.4 we in fact vary the comparability between
utility levels across proteins, and explore the consequences of each mode.
2. We can only infer a total order P among interaction classes, completely defined in
terms of Inst P (I1 ) and Inst P (I2 ). If I1 ≻P I2 , then P prefers I1 to I2 ; if I1 ≺P I2 , then
P prefers I2 to I1 ; if I1 =P I2 , then P is indifferent regarding I1 versus I2 .
We call the first scenario the utility preference model, and the second scenario is an ordinal
preference model (our terminology). We examine the two scenarios separately, in each case we
apply the appropriate concepts and impossibility results from social choice theory. Recapitulating,
our goal is to evaluate the viability of the following strategy:
Internal Aggregation: Examine interaction instances of each protein, deriving the manifested
individual preferences, either a utility function uP or a total order P , for each protein P .
External Aggregation: Examine individual preferences and derive the global preference, which
is similarly a utility function or a total order.
We assume that the internal aggregation might be subject to errors, but not in presence or
scope such that they might deem any individual preference “more representative” than another.
Errors are small and covert. This idea is formalized by the anonymity requirement (Axiom 4.5) for
the external aggregation.
4
External Aggregation
In this section we will axiomatize the requirements of the external aggregation procedure. We
discuss the general problem structure on Sec. 4.1, followed by an axiomatic formulation of the basic
requirements on Sec. 4.2. We finally show that the external aggregation (axiomatized as below) is
5
subject to fundamental impossibility results studied in the context of voting theory regardless of:
(1) the function e; and (2) the utility function uP or the total order P for any protein P .
In other words, the strategy outlined above, in the end of Sec. 3, will pose some fundamental
methodological limitations regardless on how the internal aggregation is defined – how distances,
contact, physiochemical potentials, as well how preferences are extracted. Specific axioms and
impossibility theorems for the case with ordinal preference is presented on Sec. 4.3, and for the case
with utility preference on Sec. 4.4.
4.1
Basic Notation
The external aggregation is defined as follows. Consider all interaction classes I = {I1 , . . . , I380 },
and arbitrary n proteins P = {P1 , . . . , Pn }, with some finite n ≥ 2. Considering our two preference
models:
• In the ordinal preference setting, the individual preference of Pi is a total order i over I. By
definition, these relations are total (Ia i Ib or Ib i Ia for any Ia , Ib ), transitive (if Ia i Ib
and Ib i Ic then Ia i Ic ), and antisymmetric (Ia i Ib and Ib i Ia implies Ia =i Ib ).
• In the utility preference setting, the individual preference of Pi is a utility function ui : I → R.
The utilities imply a total order (if ui (Ia ) ≤ ui (Ib ) then Ia i Ib ).
The individual preference manifested by protein Pi is denoted as I(i). The preference profile
is composed of all individual preferences: I = (I(0), . . . , I(n)). Finally, the universe of preference
profiles is composed of all preference profiles: I∗ = {I : I is a valid preference profile}. The external
aggregation procedure returns a global preference, either a total order O or a utility function uO
over I. We consider the two cases separately.
In terms of notation, for any individual or the global preference X, if Ia Ib in X, we write
Ia X Ib (and similarly for other relations). So, if Ia Ib in I(i), we write Ia I(i) Ib ; besides, if
Ia Ib in O, we write Ia O Ib . For any two preferences X and Y , if Ia X Ib ⇔ Ia Y Ib , then
we write SameOrder(X, Y, Ia ∼ Ib ).
4.2
General Axioms
Our first axioms simply models the requirement that the procedure receives multiple individual
preferences and produces a single global preference. Individual preferences are transitive ordering
over interaction classes.
Axiom 4.1. Agreement After the external aggregation, we obtain a single global preference among
interaction classes.
Axiom 4.2. Transitivity The individual preferences as well as the global preference are total
transitive orderings over interaction classes.
The unrestricted domain requirement, stated below, is an imposition on the external aggregation, not on the actual preference profile. Intuitively speaking, the external aggregation must be
able to handle arbitrary transitive individual preferences.
Axiom 4.3. Unrestricted Domain Any total order among interaction classes is permitted in a
preference profile.
6
If any set of at least three interaction classes S = {I1 , I2 , I3 } is such that both (1) Ii Ij and
(2) Ij Ii are possible preferences in the preference profile, for any 1 ≤ i, j ≤ 3, S is called a
3-unrestricted preference set.
In a first glance, Axiom 4.3 may appear overly imposing for practical purposes. After all, the
preference profile expressed in the PDB, given a suitable internal aggregation procedure, can be
more restrictive. However, it seems reasonable to expect a 3-unrestricted preference set in the
preference profile after the internal aggregation. In that case, the Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem
(Theorem 4.14) is applicable, and May’s Theorem (Theorem 4.15) may imply the possibility of
breaking transitivity (discussed ahead). Even considering the much less restrictive condition of
having only a 3-unrestricted preference set in the preference profile, the results apply. We keep the
complete unrestricted domain axiom for its generality appeal.
The unanimity requirement requires that if all proteins expose a preference on a particular
interaction class over another, the unanimity should be respected.
Axiom 4.4. Unanimity. For any I ∈ I∗ , if SameOrder(I(i), I(j), Ia ∼ Ib ) for all Pi , Pj then
SameOrder(I(i), O, Ia ∼ Ib ) for all Pi , considering arbitrary Ia , Ib ;
We assume that proteins manifest preferences over interaction classes in an indistinguishable
manner; i.e., we cannot infer whether protein A manifests a “better” individual preference than
protein B. As mentioned before, we assume that the internal aggregation might be subject to
errors, but not in presence or scope such that they might deem any individual preference “more
representative” than another. Errors are small and covert. In specific terms, the preferences
manifested by protein A and those by protein B are considered without regard to their identity.
Axiom 4.5. Anonymity. For any I′ , I′′ ∈ I∗ , whenever I′ = (I(0)′ , . . . , I(n)′ ) is a permutation of
I′′ = (I(0)′′ , . . . , I(n)′′ ), we have that O′ = O′′ .
We note that anonymity implicates in non-dictatorship, i.e., the fact that no individual preference completely and exclusively defines the global preference.
Axiom 4.6. Non-Dictatorship. For all Pi ∈ P there exists at least one I ∈ I∗ and elements
Ia , Ib such that Ia ≻I(i) Ib but Ia O Ib .
4.3
Ordinal Preference Model
Our external aggregation procedure is modeled after social welfare functions, a basic concept
in social choice theory, simply representing a procedure that receives total orders on elements of
I and produces a total order over elements of I. We start with basic axioms meaningful for the
ordinal preference model, followed by impossibility results.
4.3.1
Axioms
The neutrality requirement, formalized below, basically requires that all pairwise preferences
over interaction classes are treated equally: the procedure computing the outcome of all pairwise
preferences is oblivious to the particular names of interaction classes. We say that two preference
profiles are compatible whenever they have the same number of individual preferences.
Axiom 4.7. Neutrality. For any compatible (I′ , I′′ ) and corresponding outputs (O′ , O′′ ), if we
have [∀Pi ea I(i)′ eb ⇔ ec I(i)′′ ed ] then ea O′ eb ⇔ ec O′′ ed , considering arbitrary ea , eb , ec , ed ;
7
If we make ec = ea and ed = eb , neutrality implies the famous and controversial Independence of
Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA). This requirement basically says that for any two aggregation scenarios
where individual preferences over arbitrary elements ea and eb remain identical, the algorithm
output similarly remains identical over those elements.
Axiom 4.8. Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA). For any compatible I′ , I′′ ∈ I∗
and corresponding outputs O′ , O′′ , if we have [∀Pi SameOrder(I(i)′ , I(i)′′ , ea ∼ eb )] then we have
SameOrder(O′ , O′′ , ea ∼ eb ), considering arbitrary ea , eb ;
Intuitively speaking, we want an aggregation procedure that behaves similarly to continuous
functions in the following sense: small changes in the preference profile will not induce substantial
changes in the global preference. We formalize this requirement using distance metrics. We first
define a distance metric d : I∗ × I∗ → R, which naturally satisfies the following:
1. d(X, X) = 0
2. d(X, X ′ ) = d(X ′ , X)
3. d(X, X ′′ ) ≤ d(X, X ′ ) + d(X ′ , X ′′ )
for any X, X ′ ∈ I∗ . Then, between two compatible preference profiles I′ , I′′ , we define
X
D=
d(I(i), I(i)′ ).
i∈{1,...,n}
Technically, we want smaller changes in the preference profile to produce smaller changes in the
global preference, where changes are measured according to the distance function. The motivation
is having an external aggregation that is robust to small imprecision in the internal aggregation.
Formally:
Axiom 4.9. Proximity Preservation. There exists a distance function d over I∗ such that
D(I, I′ ) ≤ D(I, I′′ ) ⇒ d(O, O ′ ) ≤ d(O, O ′′ ).
We want an external aggregation that responds positively (or at least monotonically) to the
preferences of the proteins. We want that positive changes on the preference of I1 over I2 , say, due
to improving our internal aggregation, induce positive (or at least monotonic) changes in the global
order. The two axioms are presented below.
Axiom 4.10. Positive Responsiveness. For any I′ , I′′ ∈ I∗ and corresponding outputs O′ , O′′ ,
if SameOrder(I(i)′ , I(i)′′ , ea ∼ eb ) for all i 6= j, and, for some j
1. ea ≺I(j)′ eb ⇒ ea I(j)′′ eb ;
2. ea =I(j)′ eb ⇒ ea ≻I(j)′′ eb ,
then ea O′ eb ⇒ ea ≻O′′ eb , considering arbitrary ea , eb .
Axiom 4.11. Monotonic Responsiveness. For any I′ , I′′ ∈ I∗ and corresponding outputs O′ , O′′ ,
if SameOrder(I(i)′ , I(i)′′ , ea ∼ eb ) for all i 6= j, and, for some j
1. ea ≺I(j)′ eb ⇒ ea I(j)′′ eb ;
2. ea =I(j)′ eb ⇒ ea ≻I(j)′′ eb ,
then ea O′ eb ⇒ ea O′′ eb , considering arbitrary ea , eb .
8
4.3.2
Impossibility Results
In this section, we romp through impossibility results from social choice theory and expose
contradictions hidden in our previous axioms. First, considering the results from [5], we conclude
that any external aggregation procedure that respects unanimity and satisfies anonymity does not
preserve proximity.
Theorem 4.12. No external aggregation can simultaneously respect Axioms 4.4, 4.5, 4.9.
Proof. Proof in [5].
Theorem 4.12 exposes a methodological difficulty: an external aggregation procedure that respects anonymity and unanimity does not preserve proximity, which goes against the intuition that
smaller changes in the preference profile should imply in smaller changes in the global preference.
Note that the theorem in [5] is valid even when the unrestricted domain axiom is not considered.
However, if we waive proximity preservation (hence keeping unanimity and anonymity), having an
unrestricted domain still frustrates our requirements, as we conflict with neutrality:
Corollary 4.13. No external aggregation can simultaneously respect Axioms 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.7.
Proof. Since anonymity implicates in non-dictatorship and neutrality implicates in the IIA, this is
a corollary of the Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem [3].
The famous Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem [3] is widely considered as a landmark of modern
social choice theory. There exist many proofs for such result (including [3, 6, 10]). The original
theorem is presented below. Note that even relaxing anonymity to non-dictatorship, and neutrality
to the IIA, the original theorem applies:
Theorem 4.14 (Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem). No external aggregation (modeled after social
welfare functions) can simultaneously respect Axioms 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 4.8.
Proof. Proof in [3].
If we want a positively responsive aggregation procedure (i.e., respecting axiom 4.10), May’s
Theorem [12] says that the preference regarding each pairwise comparison among interaction classes
is necessarily decided by simple majority. For any interaction classes Ia , Ib ∈ I, define
N (Ia > Ib ) = |{Pi : Ia ≻I(i) Ib }|.
Theorem 4.15 (May’s Theorem). For each interaction class (Ia , Ib ), any decision function2 respecting Axioms 4.4, 4.7, and 4.10 is such that Ia O Ib ⇔ [N (Ia > Ib ) ≥ N (Ib > Ia )].
The problem implied by May’s Theorem is that the global preference might be intransitive
[6, 4] if a 3-unrestricted preference set exists in the preference profile (which seems reasonable after
the internal aggregation). In fact, even waiving neutrality (preserving just the IIA) conflicts with
positive responsiveness ([4], chap. 22), so perhaps the problem is the positive responsiveness itself.
Settling for monotonicity (Axiom 4.11) works around May’s theorem, but then we could argue
whether waiving neutrality (preserving just the IIA) is reasonable or not.
2
For us, external aggregation procedure.
9
At first, it sounds reasonable to treat preferences consistently across different interaction classes
(as suggested by neutrality and by the IIA). As implied above, restrictions like neutrality (and its
weaker restriction, the IIA), even with seemingly natural meaning, have strong axiomatic implications. Nevertheless, dropping neutrality poses serious methodological difficulties for our strategy:
in that case, names of interaction classes matter for our external aggregation. Their relationship
and place, however, are precisely our unknowns.
Many impossibility theorems in the voting theory literature presume unrestricted domains (or
simply a 3-unrestricted preference set). For the Arrow’s Theorem as well as the May’s Theorem,
performing suitable domain restrictions, where we limit the preference profile, might be enough to
overcome the theoretical impossibilities. If preferences are single-peaked or quasi-transitive (please
refer to [16, 15]), we also dodge from the impossibility results above. We invite the reader to
appreciate these previous results and understand the relevance of these theorems for problems
related to protein folding, and perhaps in other similar contexts where a 2-step preference model
is similarly suitable.
4.4
Utility Preference Model
In this section, we discuss the utility preference model. In this setting, it is possible to obtain
utility values associated with each interaction class in each individual protein. In other words, for
any protein Pi , there exists a utility function ui mapping interaction classes to utility values. Recall
that we intend to analyze preferences manifested by individual proteins in an individual setting, and
then make an external aggregation. We presume utility functions that are not comparable across
proteins. In the following subsection, we improve the comparability and explore the consequences.
For now, we technically assume that the utility function for P differ in origin and scale from
the utility function for Q, taking any proteins P 6= Q. Formally:
Axiom 4.16. Any utility function is a strictly increasing linear transformation of another utility
function: uP = αpq uQ + βpq for some αpq > 0 and any βpq , considering any proteins P and Q.
Borrowing terminology from voting theory, there is no interpersonal comparisons of utility
levels or of gains and losses among different individual preferences. Note that this is fundamentally
different from the approach where there is free comparison among utility levels (energy scores)
measured across different proteins, as seen in [11, 17, 13].
With that in mind, we are still going to consider ordinal preferences, however expressed through
utility functions, in a continuous manner. Consider the space R380
+ where the i-th coordinate of an
arbitrary point p is represented by p[i]. A point p an expression descriptor for interaction classes:
p is such that the bigger the p[i], the bigger the associated expression for the interaction class Ii .
Furthermore, for sufficiently close levels of expression descriptors (i.e., points in R380
+ ), the utility
function has sufficiently close values. Formally, we define
X
uP (Ii ) · p[i],
UP (p) =
I1 ...I380
representing the utility associated with some point p. Technically, UP is a utility function over the
expression descriptor space. Note that UP is linear, implying that the expression of I1 is worth
uP (I1 )/uP (I2 ) times the expression of I2 for any interaction classes I1 and I2 and protein P .
10
Of course, this informational framework is subject to the same impossibility results as before, but
other interesting results further apply. We now briefly overview the approach of [7, 14], describing
an impossibility result that mirrors (in the continuous setting) Theorem 4.12.
The indifference hyperplane HPc is the hyperplane containing points p where UP (p) = c. Note
that HPc and HPd are parallel for any positive constants c and d. The unit vector perpendicular to
HPc (for an arbitrary constant c > 0), called vP , represents the direction where the utility increases
for P . The length of the vector is disconsidered precisely because we are taking a purely ordinal
interpretation of the utility functions: their origin and scale are not comparable among different
proteins.
The individual preference for P , denoted by vP , is a unit vector indicating the direction that
maximizes UP . Note that vP denotes a unique point in the 380-dimensional sphere S 380 . The
global preference, denoted by vO , and is also a unit vector indicating the direction that maximizes
the global utility. The external aggregation is such that
E : |S 380 × .{z
. . × S 380} → S 380 ,
n
where E satisfies the following:
Axiom 4.17. Continuity. The external aggregation E is a continuous function.
The anonymity and unanimity, central requirements for our aggregate mechanism, are rephrased
for our continuous setting below.
Axiom 4.18. Continuous unanimity. If vP = v for all proteins P , then the vO = v.
Axiom 4.19. Continuous anonymity. E(v1 , . . . , vn ) = E(π(v1 ), . . . , π(vn )), where π is a permutation function over individual preferences.
Theorem 4.20. No external aggregation can simultaneously respect Axioms 4.18, 4.19, and 4.17.
Proof. Follows from [7, 14].
Note how Theorem 4.20 mirrors Theorem 4.12 in the continuous setting. At first glance, it seems
that anonymity and unanimity are inherently incompatible with a notion of continuity. In fact,
the generality imposed by seemingly innocuous axioms is also fundamental to such impossibilities.
Specifically, performing domain restrictions, that is, reducing the generality of possible individual
preferences, is often sufficient to escape impossibility results (please refer to [7, 14]).
The continuity requirement models our robustness to imprecision in the internal aggregation
procedure. It parallels the proximity preservation property defined for ordinal preferences. In both
scenarios, in light of our general axioms, we have impossibility results that seriously hinder the
methodological strategy considered in this work.
4.4.1
Inter-Protein Comparison of Energy Levels
Let us now increase the comparability among utility function for different proteins. The utility
function for P differs in origin, but not in scale, from the utility function for Q, taking any proteins
P 6= Q. Formally:
11
Axiom 4.21. Any utility function is a strictly increasing linear transformation of another utility
function: uP = αuQ + βP Q for some fixed and unique α > 0 and any βP Q , considering any proteins
P and Q.
Borrowing terminology from voting theory, there is no interpersonal comparisons of utility levels,
but there is comparison between gains and losses among different individual preferences, since the
scale is the same. For the utility preference model, we write SameValue(X, Y, Ia ∼ Ib ) to denote
uX (Ia ) = uY (Ib ). Now consider the axioms below.
Utility IIA. For any compatible I′ , I′′ ∈ I∗ and O′ , O′′ , if [∀Pi SameValue(I(i)′ , I(i)′′ , ea ∼ eb )]
then we have that SameOrder(O′ , O′′ , ea ∼ eb ), considering arbitrary ea , eb ;
Strict Unanimity. For any I ∈ I∗ , if SameOrder(I(i), I(j), Ia ∼ Ib ) for all Pi , Pj then we have
SameOrder(I(i), O, Ia ∼ Ib ) for all Pi , considering arbitrary Ia , Ib ; Also, if Ia ≻I(i) Ib for an
arbitrary protein P , then Ia ≻O Ib .
Interestingly, those axioms imply that the external aggregation is the utilitarian rule [8]:
X
X
Ia O Ib ⇔
uP (Ia ) ≥
uP (Ib ).
P ∈P
P ∈P
In current literature [11, 17, 13], it is usual to perform a 1-step holistic analysis of the PDB in
order to infer a certain conclusion. Social choice theory can provide interesting characterizations
and consequences for different levels of comparability of preferences, or whichever concept maps
suitably (e.g energy scores).
5
Discussion and Final Remarks
In this work we hope to have illustrated the application and relevance of social choice theory not
only to the problem and methodology that intends to infer biases in the UEF, but to other problems
related to protein folding where the 2-step approach makes sense. We particularly think that the
2-step approach is sensible in light of Anfinsen’s thermodynamic hypothesis, as if stable folds are
the result solely of a protein’s individual aminoacid sequence, considering the PDB holistically may
not be always desirable.
Note that the problem considered in this work is formally weaker than those aiming for more
complete characterizations of the UEF with our 2-step approach and the same axiomatic setting.
Stronger characterizations of the UEF via the method above will suffer from similar methodological
limitations unless axioms are relaxed, made more specific, or otherwise changed appropriately.
Many impossibility results highlighted here rely on the generality of the axioms. Our axioms
specify, for instance, that any possible individual preference is valid. While this is attractive in an
axiomatic setting, it is necessary to the Arrow’s Impossibility Result and implies possibly breaking
transitivity in light of May’s Theorem. However, those conditions can be avoided. In some cases
(such as for Corollary 4.13 and Theorem 4.20), a suitable domain restriction, which disallows
some particular individual preferences, avoid the issues (please refer to [6, 7]). If preferences are
single-peaked or quasi-transitive, we also dodge from the impossibility results above (please refer
to [16, 15]). Given the considerations here, we invite the reader to appreciate these previous results
and understand their relevance for algorithm design – not only in the context of protein folding with
12
the thermodynamic hypothesis, but perhaps in other similar contexts where a 2-step aggregation
procedure is similarly suitable. The social choice literature is vast – and we urge the community of
computer scientists to investigate these results and their possibly immense connection and relevance
to problems involving protein folding.
References
[1] http://www.rcsb.org.
[2] Christian B. Anfinsen. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains.
181(4096):223–230, 1973.
Science,
[3] Kenneth Arrow. Social Choice and Individual Values. John Wiley and Sons, 1963.
[4] K.J. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator, editors. Handbook of Mathematical Economics, volume III.
Elsevier Science Publishers, 1986.
[5] Nick Baigent. Preference proximity and anonymous social choice. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 102(1):pp. 161–170, 1987.
[6] Donald Campbell and Jerry Kelly. Impossibility theorems in the arrovian framework. volume 1
of Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, chapter 1, pages 35 – 94. Elsevier, 2002.
[7] Graciela Chichilnisky. Social aggregation rules and continuity. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 97(2):pp. 337–352, 1982.
[8] Claude D’Aspremont and Louis Gevers. Equity and the informational basis of collective choice.
The Review of Economic Studies, 44(2):pp. 199–209, 1977.
[9] Ken A. Dill, S. Banu Ozkan, M. Scott Shell, and Thomas R. Weikl. The protein folding
problem. Annual Review of Biophysics, 37(1):289–316, 2008.
[10] John Geanakoplos. Three brief proofs of arrow’s impossibility theorem. Cowles Foundation
Discussion Papers 1123R3, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University,
April 1996.
[11] R. Jernigan and I. Bahar. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Current
Opinion Structural Biology, 6(2):195–209, 1996.
[12] Kenneth May. A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority
decision. Econometrica, 20(4):680–684, 1952.
[13] S. Miyazawa and R. Jernigan. Self-consistent estimation of inter-residue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues. Proteins: Structure, Function,
and Genetics, 34(1):49–68, 1999.
[14] Baigent Nicholas. Chapter eighteen - topological theories of social choice. In Amartya Sen
Kenneth J. Arrow and Kotaro Suzumura, editors, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare,
volume 2 of Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, pages 301 – 334. Elsevier, 2011.
13
[15] Amartya Sen. Quasi-transitivity, rational choice and collective decisions. The Review of Economic Studies, 36(3):pp. 381–393, 1969.
[16] Amartya K. Sen. A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions. Econometrica, 34(2):491–499,
1966.
[17] P. Thomas and K. Dill. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein
structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
93(21):11628–11633, 1996.
14
| 5cs.CE
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.