post_href
stringlengths
57
213
python_solutions
stringlengths
71
22.3k
slug
stringlengths
3
77
post_title
stringlengths
1
100
user
stringlengths
3
29
upvotes
int64
-20
1.2k
views
int64
0
60.9k
problem_title
stringlengths
3
77
number
int64
1
2.48k
acceptance
float64
0.14
0.91
difficulty
stringclasses
3 values
__index_level_0__
int64
0
34k
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/2807092/Python3-O(1)-Space
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: left_sum, right_sum = 0, sum(nums) left, right = 0, len(nums) min_value, return_idx= abs(right_sum//right), len(nums)-1 for i in range(0,len(nums) - 1): left_sum += nums[i] left+=1 right_sum -= nums[i] right -=1 curr = abs(left_sum//left - right_sum//right) if min_value > curr or (min_value == curr and i < return_idx): min_value = curr return_idx = i return return_idx
minimum-average-difference
Python3 - O(1) Space
Saitama1v1
0
3
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,200
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/2675685/Python3-Solution-oror-O(N)-Time-and-O(1)-Space-Complexity
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: n=len(nums) if n==1: return 0 for i in range(1,n): nums[i]=nums[i]+nums[i-1] totalSum=nums[-1] minVal,minIdx=10000000,0 l=1 r=n-1 for i in range(n-1): if abs(int(nums[l-1]/l)-int((totalSum-nums[l-1])/r))<minVal: minVal=abs(int(nums[l-1]/l)-int((totalSum-nums[l-1])/r)) minIdx=l-1 l,r=l+1,r-1 if int(totalSum/n)<minVal: return l-1 return minIdx
minimum-average-difference
Python3 Solution || O(N) Time & O(1) Space Complexity
akshatkhanna37
0
7
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,201
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/2592708/Python-Prefix-Sum-Solution
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: n = len(nums) prefix_sum = [] running_sum = 0 for num in nums: running_sum += num prefix_sum.append(running_sum) difference = float('inf') index = 0 m = len(prefix_sum) for i in range(1, m): operand1 = prefix_sum[i - 1] // i operand2 = (running_sum - prefix_sum[i - 1]) // (m - i) if abs(operand1 - operand2) < difference: difference = abs(operand1 - operand2) index = i - 1 return n - 1 if running_sum // n < difference else index
minimum-average-difference
Python Prefix Sum Solution
mansoorafzal
0
50
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,202
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/2471879/Python-Prefix-Sum-O(n)-Solution
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: S, n = sum(nums), len(nums) prefixSum = [nums[0]] for i in range(1, len(nums)): prefixSum.append(prefixSum[-1] + nums[i]) min_diff, min_index = float('inf'), -float('inf') for i in range(len(nums)): if n - i - 1 != 0: abs_diff = abs(prefixSum[i] // (i+1) - (S - prefixSum[i]) // (n - i - 1)) else: abs_diff = abs(prefixSum[i] // (i+1)) if abs_diff < min_diff: min_diff = abs_diff min_index = i return min_index
minimum-average-difference
Python Prefix Sum O(n) Solution
Vayne1994
0
60
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,203
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/2347332/Faster-than-92-~-python-solution
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: left,right,mins,n = 0 , sum(nums), float('inf'),len(nums) for i in range(n): left += nums[i] right-= nums[i] first = left//(i+1) second = 0 if i+1 ==n else right//(len(nums)-(i+1)) result = abs(first - second) if(result<mins): mins=result res=i return res ``` ```
minimum-average-difference
Faster than 92% ~ python solution
khayaltech
0
56
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,204
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/2107213/Python-easy-intuitive-soln
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: # Logic is simple we use prefix sum property # Rest is done in one pass # T(n)=o(n) left=0 right=sum(nums) mini=float('inf') ans=0 for i in range(len(nums)): left+=nums[i] right-=nums[i] x=left//(i+1) if right==0: y=0 else: y=right//(len(nums)-(i+1)) if abs(x-y)<mini: mini=abs(x-y) ans=i return ans
minimum-average-difference
Python, easy , intuitive soln
Aniket_liar07
0
36
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,205
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/2003850/python-java-prefix-sum-(Time-On-space-On(java)-O1(python))
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: for i in range (1, len(nums)) : nums[i] += nums[i-1] mini = nums[-1] // len(nums) id = len(nums) - 1 i = id - 1 l = id r = 1 while i >= 0 : x = abs(nums[i] // l - (nums[-1] - nums[i]) // r ) if x <= mini : mini = x id = i i -= 1 l -= 1 r += 1 return id
minimum-average-difference
python, java - prefix sum (Time On, space On(java), O1(python))
ZX007java
0
53
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,206
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/1995420/Python-Solution
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: forward = [] total = 0 for i, num in enumerate(nums): total += num forward.append(total // (i + 1)) backward = [0] total = 0 for i, num in enumerate(nums[::-1][:len(nums) - 1]): total += num backward.append(total // (i + 1)) result = float('inf') n = len(nums) for i in range(len(forward)): if result > abs(forward[i] - backward[n - i- 1]): ans = i result = abs(forward[i] - backward[n - i - 1]) if len(nums) == 1: return 0 return ans
minimum-average-difference
Python Solution
user6397p
0
24
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,207
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/1995264/Prefix-postfix-Sum-oror-O(n)-Space-Python3
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: if len(nums) == 1: if nums[0] == 0: return 0 if nums[0] == 1: return 0 temp1 = 0 prefix = [] temp2 = 0 postfix = [] for num in nums: prefix.append(temp1) temp1 += num for i in range(len(nums)-1,-1,-1): postfix.append(temp2) temp2 += nums[i] postfix.reverse() ans = [] n = len(nums) for i in range(n-1): temp = abs((nums[i]+prefix[i])//(i+1)-(postfix[i])//(n-i-1)) ans.append(temp) #Exception handled in 32 and 33 line temp = sum(nums)//n ans.append(temp) t = float('inf') ![Uploading file...]() for i in range(len(ans)): if ans[i]<t: a = i t = ans[i] return a
minimum-average-difference
Prefix postfix Sum || O(n) Space Python3
COEIT_1903480130037
0
23
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,208
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/1994912/Prefix-Sum-oror-O(n)
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: s=sum(nums) n=len(nums) l=[] c=0 d=0 for i in range(len(nums)-1): """ Adding nums[i] to c to keep record of sum(nums[:i]) """ c+=nums[i] """ Subtracting c from sum(nums) so that d become updated """ d=s-c a=c//(i+1) b=d//(n-i-1) l.append(abs(a-b)) """ Appending whole sum(nums) into l as control of execution reaches at the last element of nums""" l.append(sum(nums)//n) return l.index(min(l)) ```
minimum-average-difference
Prefix Sum || O(n)
a_dityamishra
0
17
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,209
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-average-difference/discuss/1994630/Python3-O(n)-prefix-sum-Solution
class Solution: def minimumAverageDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: total_sum = sum(nums) start = 0 prefix_sum = [] for element in nums: start += element prefix_sum.append(start) mini = sys.maxsize res = None size_t = len(nums) for i in range(len(nums)-1): diff = abs(floor(prefix_sum[i]/(i+1)) - floor((total_sum - prefix_sum[i])/(size_t - i - 1))) if diff < mini: mini = diff res = i last_diff = abs(floor(total_sum/size_t)) if last_diff < mini: mini = last_diff; res = size_t - 1 return res
minimum-average-difference
Python3 O(n) prefix sum Solution
xxHRxx
0
20
minimum average difference
2,256
0.359
Medium
31,210
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/1994806/Simple-python-code
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: vis = [[0]*n for _ in range(m)] # i - rows, j - colums # sum(row.count('hit') for row in grid) for i,j in walls: vis[i][j] = 2 for i,j in guards: vis[i][j] = 2 for i,j in guards: for l in range(j-1,-1,-1): if self.checkWall(i,l,vis): break vis[i][l] = 1 for r in range(j+1,n): if self.checkWall(i,r,vis): break vis[i][r] = 1 for u in range(i-1,-1,-1): if self.checkWall(u,j,vis): break vis[u][j] = 1 for d in range(i+1,m): if self.checkWall(d,j, vis): break vis[d][j] = 1 return sum(row.count(0) for row in vis) def checkWall(self, i, j, vis): if vis[i][j] ==2: return True
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
Simple python code
beast316
1
37
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,211
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/1994591/Python-solution-using-DFS.
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: #Create a matrix, hint from question mat = [[0 for _ in range(n)] for _ in range(m)] for [i,j] in guards: mat[i][j] = 1 for [i,j] in walls: mat[i][j] = -1 #dfs for marking paths. def dfs(i,j,di): if i<0 or i>=m or j<0 or j>=n or mat[i][j] == 1 or mat[i][j] == -1: return else: mat[i][j] = 2 i = i + lst[di] j = j + lst[di+1] dfs(i,j,di) lst = [1,0,-1,0,1] for [i,j] in guards: for idx in range(4): k = i + lst[idx] l = j + lst[idx+1] dfs(k,l,idx) #count uncovered cells. count = 0 for i in range(m): for j in range(n): if mat[i][j]==0: count +=1 return count
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
Python solution using DFS.
avshet_a01
1
52
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,212
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/1994560/Python-or-DFS-or-Greedy-or-O(mn)
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: guarded = set() guard_set = set() wall_set = set() for guard in guards: guard_set.add((guard[0], guard[1])) for wall in walls: wall_set.add((wall[0], wall[1])) # left, right, bottom, top directions = [(1, 0), (-1, 0), (0, -1), (0, 1)] # find all guarded for guard in guards: for dx, dy in directions: x, y = guard # travel one direction while 0 <= x + dx < m and 0 <= y + dy < n: x, y = x + dx , y + dy if (x, y) in guard_set or (x, y) in wall_set: break guarded.add((x, y)) # count unguarded not_guarded_count = 0 for i in range(m): for j in range(n): if (i,j) not in guarded and (i, j) not in wall_set and (i, j) not in guard_set: not_guarded_count += 1 return not_guarded_count
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
Python | DFS | Greedy | O(mn)
rbhandu
1
61
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,213
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/2713446/Python3-Count-as-you-go.-Commented-and-Easy-solution.
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: # make the grid which cells are guarded unseen = [[1]*n for _ in range(m)] # initialize a the number of unseen cells result = m*n # set all the walls and guards for rx, cx in walls + guards: # place the wall unseen[rx][cx] = 0 # subtract from result result -= 1 # now go over all the guards and update result # grx is guard row index # gcx is guard column index # brx is "blick" row index (blick is german for view) # bcx is "blick" column index for grx, gcx in guards: # go from this position till the left end or until we hit a wall for bcx in range(gcx-1, -1, -1): # check whether we change an unseen box if unseen[grx][bcx] == 1: unseen[grx][bcx] = -1 result -= 1 # check whether we hit a wall or other guard elif unseen[grx][bcx] == 0: break # go from this position to the right end or wall for bcx in range(gcx+1, n): # check whether we change an unseen box if unseen[grx][bcx] == 1: unseen[grx][bcx] = -1 result -= 1 # check whether we hit a wall or other guard elif unseen[grx][bcx] == 0: break # go from this position up and check for end or walls for brx in range(grx-1, -1, -1): # check whether we change an unseen box if unseen[brx][gcx] == 1: unseen[brx][gcx] = -1 result -= 1 # check whether we hit a wall or other guard elif unseen[brx][gcx] == 0: break # go from this position down and check for end or walls for brx in range(grx+1, m): # check whether we change an unseen box if unseen[brx][gcx] == 1: unseen[brx][gcx] = -1 result -= 1 # check whether we hit a wall or other guard elif unseen[brx][gcx] == 0: break return result
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
[Python3] - Count as you go. Commented and Easy solution.
Lucew
0
2
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,214
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/2046865/Python3-No-grid-interval-merge-%2B-binary-search
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: amt = (m * n) - len(walls) walls_x, walls_y = defaultdict(list), defaultdict(list) ranges_x, ranges_y = defaultdict(list), defaultdict(list) for x, y in walls: insort_left(walls_x[x], y) insort_left(walls_y[y], x) def range_search(a, i, lim): if not a: return (0, lim) j = bisect_left(a, i) if j == len(a): return (a[-1]+1, lim) if j == 0: if a[j] < i: return (a[0]+1, lim) return (0, a[0]) return (a[j-1]+1, a[j]) for x, y in guards: insort_left(ranges_x[x], range_search(walls_x[x], y, n)) insort_left(ranges_y[y], range_search(walls_y[y], x, m)) for d in ranges_x, ranges_y: for s in d: d[s] = self.merge(d[s]) y_list = sorted(ranges_y) for ranges in ranges_x, ranges_y: amt -= sum((c2 - c1) for cs in ranges.values() for c1, c2 in cs) for x, ys in ranges_x.items(): for y1, y2 in ys: for y in y_list[bisect_left(y_list, y1):bisect_left(y_list, y2)]: ip = min(bisect_left(ranges_y[y], (x,)), len(ranges_y[y])-1) if x in range(*ranges_y[y][ip]) or (ip > 0 and x in range(*ranges_y[y][ip-1])): amt += 1 return amt def merge(self, intervals: List[List[int]]) -> List[List[int]]: out = [] for start, end in intervals: if not out: out.append((start, end)) elif out[-1][1] >= start: out[-1] = out[-1][0], max(end, out[-1][1]) else: out.append((start, end)) return out
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
[Python3] No grid, interval merge + binary search
NotTheSwimmer
0
68
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,215
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/2046865/Python3-No-grid-interval-merge-%2B-binary-search
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: amt = (m * n) - len(walls) walls_x, walls_y = defaultdict(list), defaultdict(list) ranges_x, ranges_y = defaultdict(list), defaultdict(list) for x, y in walls: walls_x[x].append(y) walls_y[y].append(x) for d in walls_x, walls_y: for l in d.values(): l.sort() def range_search(a, i, lim): if not a: return (0, lim) j = bisect_left(a, i) if j == len(a): return (a[-1]+1, lim) if j == 0: if a[j] < i: return (a[0]+1, lim) return (0, a[0]) return (a[j-1]+1, a[j]) for x, y in guards: ranges_x[x].append(range_search(walls_x[x], y, n)) ranges_y[y].append(range_search(walls_y[y], x, m)) for d in ranges_x, ranges_y: for s in d: d[s] = self.merge(d[s]) y_list = sorted(ranges_y) for x, ys in ranges_x.items(): for y1, y2 in ys: amt -= (y2 - y1) yl = bisect_left(y_list, y1) yr = bisect_left(y_list, y2) for y in y_list[yl:yr]: if x not in range(ranges_y[y][0][0], ranges_y[y][-1][1]): continue ip = min(bisect_left(ranges_y[y], (x,)), len(ranges_y[y])-1) if x in range(*ranges_y[y][ip]) or (ip > 0 and x in range(*ranges_y[y][ip-1])): amt += 1 for y, xs in ranges_y.items(): for x1, x2 in xs: amt -= (x2 - x1) return amt def merge(self, intervals: List[List[int]]) -> List[List[int]]: intervals.sort() out = [] for start, end in intervals: if not out: out.append((start, end)) elif out[-1][1] >= start: out[-1] = out[-1][0], max(end, out[-1][1]) else: out.append((start, end)) return out
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
[Python3] No grid, interval merge + binary search
NotTheSwimmer
0
68
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,216
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/2001783/Set-of-cells-iterate-over-guards-58-speed
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: set_g = set((r, c) for r, c in guards) set_w = set((r, c) for r, c in walls) set_cells = set((r, c) for r in range(m) for c in range(n)) set_cells -= set_g set_cells -= set_w seen_cells = set() for guard_r, guard_c in set_g: # right r, c = guard_r, guard_c + 1 while (r, c) in set_cells: seen_cells.add((r, c)) c += 1 # left r, c = guard_r, guard_c - 1 while (r, c) in set_cells: seen_cells.add((r, c)) c -= 1 # down r, c = guard_r + 1, guard_c while (r, c) in set_cells: seen_cells.add((r, c)) r += 1 # up r, c = guard_r - 1, guard_c while (r, c) in set_cells: seen_cells.add((r, c)) r -= 1 return len(set_cells - seen_cells)
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
Set of cells, iterate over guards, 58% speed
EvgenySH
0
20
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,217
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/1999394/Python3-or-DP-or-Explained-solution
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: mat = [['X' for _ in range(n)] for _ in range(m)] for row, col in guards: mat[row][col] = 'G' for row, col in walls: mat[row][col] = 'W' seen_guard = False ans = 0 # from left to right for i in range(m): # flag is deactivated for each row seen_guard = False for j in range(n): # curr cell has guard # activate flag if mat[i][j] == 'G': seen_guard = True # curr cell has wall # deactivate the flag elif mat[i][j] == 'W': seen_guard = False # open cell # close if a guard watching elif mat[i][j] == 'X': if seen_guard: mat[i][j] = 'O' else: ans += 1 #print(ans) # from right to left for i in range(m): # flag is deactivated for each row seen_guard = False for j in range(n - 1, -1 , -1): if mat[i][j] == 'O': continue # curr cell has guard # activate flag elif mat[i][j] == 'G': seen_guard = True # curr cell has wall # deactivate the flag elif mat[i][j] == 'W': seen_guard = False # open cell # close if a guard watching elif mat[i][j] == 'X': if seen_guard: mat[i][j] = 'O' ans -= 1 # from top to bottom for j in range(n): # flag is deactivated for each row seen_guard = False for i in range(m): if mat[i][j] == 'O': continue # curr cell has guard # activate flag elif mat[i][j] == 'G': seen_guard = True # curr cell has wall # deactivate the flag elif mat[i][j] == 'W': seen_guard = False # open cell # close if a guard watching elif mat[i][j] == 'X': if seen_guard: mat[i][j] = 'O' ans -= 1 # from bottom to top for j in range(n): # flag is deactivated for each row seen_guard = False for i in range(m - 1, -1, -1): if mat[i][j] == 'O': continue # curr cell has guard # activate flag elif mat[i][j] == 'G': seen_guard = True # curr cell has wall # deactivate the flag elif mat[i][j] == 'W': seen_guard = False # open cell # close if a guard watching elif mat[i][j] == 'X': if seen_guard: mat[i][j] = 'O' ans -= 1 return ans
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
Python3 | DP | Explained solution
showing_up_each_day
0
18
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,218
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/1994920/Greedy-Python-Solution-oror-100-Faster-oror-Memory-less-than-67
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: G=set() ; M=[[0]*n for _ in range(m)] for i,j in walls: M[i][j]=1 for i,j in guards: M[i][j]=2 for i,j in guards: j1=j-1 while j1>=0: if M[i][j1] in (1,2): break G.add((i,j1)) j1-=1 j1=j+1 while j1<n: if M[i][j1] in (1,2): break G.add((i,j1)) j1+=1 i1=i-1 while i1>=0: if M[i1][j] in (1,2): break G.add((i1,j)) i1-=1 i1=i+1 while i1<m: if M[i1][j] in (1,2): break G.add((i1,j)) i1+=1 return m*n-len(guards)-len(walls)-len(G)
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
Greedy Python Solution || 100% Faster || Memory less than 67%
Taha-C
0
12
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,219
https://leetcode.com/problems/count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid/discuss/1994679/Python3-two-pass-O(mn)-Solution
class Solution: def countUnguarded(self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]) -> int: grid = [[0]*n for _ in range(m)] for x, y in guards: grid[x][y] = 'G' for x, y in walls: grid[x][y] = 'W' grid2 = [[0]*n for _ in range(m)] for x, y in guards: grid2[x][y] = 'G' for x, y in walls: grid2[x][y] = 'W' for i in range(m): cache = [] has_G = False for j in range(n): if grid[i][j] == 0: cache.append(j) elif grid[i][j] == 'G': if cache: for k in cache: grid[i][k] = 'O' cache = [] has_G = True else: if has_G: if cache: for k in cache: grid[i][k] = 'O' cache = [] has_G = False else: cache = [] if cache: if has_G: for k in cache: grid[i][k] = 'O' for j in range(n): cache = [] has_G = False for i in range(m): if grid2[i][j] == 0: cache.append(i) elif grid2[i][j] == 'G': if cache: for k in cache: grid2[k][j] = 'O' cache = [] has_G = True else: if has_G: if cache: for k in cache: grid2[k][j] = 'O' cache = [] has_G = False else: cache = [] if cache: if has_G: for k in cache: grid2[k][j] = 'O' res = 0 for i in range(m): for j in range(n): if grid[i][j] == 0 and grid2[i][j] == 0: res += 1 return res
count-unguarded-cells-in-the-grid
Python3 two pass O(mn) Solution
xxHRxx
0
17
count unguarded cells in the grid
2,257
0.522
Medium
31,220
https://leetcode.com/problems/escape-the-spreading-fire/discuss/2005513/Python3-BFS-%2B-DFS-%2B-Binary-Search-Solution
class Solution: def maximumMinutes(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> int: #region growing to assign each grass with the time that it will catch fire m, n = len(grid), len(grid[0]) start = [] for i in range(m): for j in range(n): if grid[i][j] == 1: start.append([i,j]) grid[i][j] = 'F' elif grid[i][j] == 2: grid[i][j] = 'W' visited = set() for element in start: visited.add(tuple(element)) time = 1 while start: new_start = [] for x, y in start: if x >= 1: if grid[x-1][y] == 0 and (x-1, y) not in visited: new_start.append([x-1, y]) visited.add((x-1, y)) grid[x-1][y] = time if x < m-1: if grid[x+1][y] == 0 and (x+1, y) not in visited: new_start.append([x+1, y]) visited.add((x+1, y)) grid[x+1][y] = time if y >= 1: if grid[x][y-1] == 0 and (x, y-1) not in visited: new_start.append([x, y-1]) visited.add((x, y-1)) grid[x][y-1] = time if y < n-1: if grid[x][y+1] == 0 and (x, y+1) not in visited: new_start.append([x, y+1]) visited.add((x, y+1)) grid[x][y+1] = time time += 1 start = new_start #memo variable will save time from search path that is already proved to be impossible memo = {} def search(x, y, time, visited): if (x,y) in memo and time >= memo[(x,y)]: return False if time > grid[-1][-1]: return False if x == m-1 and y == n-1: if grid[x][y] == 0: return True else: if grid[x][y] >= time: return True else: if grid[x][y] == time: return False visited.add((x,y)) if x >= 1: if grid[x-1][y] != 'W' and grid[x-1][y] != 'F' and grid[x-1][y] > time and (x-1, y) not in visited: res = search(x-1, y, time+1, visited) if res: return True if x < m-1: if grid[x+1][y] != 'W' and grid[x+1][y] != 'F' and grid[x+1][y] > time and (x+1, y) not in visited: res = search(x+1, y, time+1, visited) if res: return True if y >= 1: if grid[x][y-1] != 'W' and grid[x][y-1] != 'F' and grid[x][y-1] > time and (x, y-1) not in visited: res = search(x, y-1, time+1, visited) if res: return True if y < n-1: if grid[x][y+1] != 'W' and grid[x][y+1] != 'F' and grid[x][y+1] > time and (x, y+1) not in visited: res = search(x, y+1, time+1, visited) if res: return True visited.remove((x,y)) if (x,y) not in memo: memo[(x,y)] = time else: memo[(x,y)] = min(time, memo[(x,y)]) return False if grid[0][0] == 0: if search(0, 0, -sys.maxsize, set()): return 10**9 else: return -1 else: start, end = 0, grid[0][0]-1 #binary search while start < end: mid = ceil((start + end)/2) if search(0, 0, mid, set()): start = mid else: end = mid - 1 if start != 0: return start else: if search(0, 0, 0, set()): return 0 else: return -1
escape-the-spreading-fire
Python3 BFS + DFS + Binary Search Solution
xxHRxx
0
44
escape the spreading fire
2,258
0.347
Hard
31,221
https://leetcode.com/problems/escape-the-spreading-fire/discuss/1995390/Python-3Binary-search
class Solution: def maximumMinutes(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> int: m, n = len(grid), len(grid[0]) def nei(x, y): for dx, dy in [(0, -1), (0, 1), (-1, 0), (1, 0)]: nx, ny = x + dx, y + dy if 0 <= nx < m and 0 <= ny < n and grid[nx][ny] != 2: yield nx, ny # recreate array to store earliest time caught fire for each grassland arr = [[0] * n for _ in range(m)] for x in range(m): for y in range(n): if grid[x][y] == 0: arr[x][y] = float('inf') elif grid[x][y] == 1: arr[x][y] = -1 elif grid[x][y] == 2: arr[x][y] = -2 # start from each fire and compute earliest time to reach each grass def fire_reach_grass(i, j): q = [(0, i, j)] while q: new_q = [] for t, x, y in q: for nx, ny in nei(x, y): if arr[nx][ny] <= t + 1: continue arr[nx][ny] = t + 1 new_q.append((t+1, nx, ny)) q = new_q for i in range(m): for j in range(n): if grid[i][j] == 1: fire_reach_grass(i, j) def person_reach_safehouse(delay): q = [(delay, 0, 0)] vis = defaultdict(lambda: float('inf'), {(0, 0): 0}) while q: new_q = [] for t, x, y in q: for nx, ny in nei(x, y): # reach safehouse and fire spread at same time is allowed if nx == m - 1 and ny == n - 1 and arr[nx][ny] >= t + 1: return True # otherwise reach at same time at grassland is not allowed if arr[nx][ny] == -1 or arr[nx][ny] <= t + 1 or vis[nx, ny] <= t + 1: continue vis[nx, ny] = t + 1 new_q.append((t+1, nx, ny)) q = new_q return False # binary search to find the maximum delay time l, h = 0, m*n while l < h: mid = l + (h - l + 1) // 2 if person_reach_safehouse(mid): l = mid if mid == m*n: return 10**9 else: if mid == 0: return -1 h = mid - 1 return l if person_reach_safehouse(l) else -1
escape-the-spreading-fire
[Python 3]Binary search
chestnut890123
0
35
escape the spreading fire
2,258
0.347
Hard
31,222
https://leetcode.com/problems/escape-the-spreading-fire/discuss/1994651/python-bfs-%2B-binary-search-%2B-preprocessing
class Solution: def maximumMinutes(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> int: R, C = len(grid), len(grid[0]) lo = 0 hi = 1000000000 fire = [[float('inf')] * C for _ in range(R)] q = deque() for r in range(R): for c in range(C): if grid[r][c] == 1: fire[r][c] = 0 q.appendleft((r, c)) step = 0 while q: nq = deque() while q: r, c = q.pop() for dr, dc in [[0, 1], [0, -1], [1, 0], [-1, 0]]: rr, cc = r + dr, c + dc if 0 <= rr < R and 0 <= cc < C and grid[rr][cc] == 0 and fire[rr][cc] == float('inf'): nq.appendleft((rr, cc)) fire[rr][cc] = min(fire[rr][cc], step + 1) step += 1 q = nq def check(mid): q = deque([(0, 0)]) v = {(0, 0): mid} while q: r, c = q.pop() step = v[r, c] if r == R - 1 and c == C - 1: return True for dr, dc in [[0, 1], [0, -1], [1, 0], [-1, 0]]: rr, cc = dr + r, c + dc if 0 <= rr < R and 0 <= cc < C and grid[rr][cc] == 0 and (rr, cc) not in v and \ (step + 1 < fire[rr][cc] or (rr, cc) == (R - 1, C - 1) and step + 1 <= fire[rr][cc] ): q.appendleft((rr, cc)) v[rr, cc] = step + 1 return False while lo < hi: mid = (lo + hi + 1) // 2 if check(mid): lo = mid else: hi = mid - 1 if check(lo): return lo return -1
escape-the-spreading-fire
python bfs + binary search + preprocessing
WRWRW
0
40
escape the spreading fire
2,258
0.347
Hard
31,223
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2074599/Python-O(N)-solution-oror-Faster-than-99-submissions-oror-Detailed-explanation.
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: # Initializing the last index as zero last_index = 0 #iterating each number to find the occurences, \ # and to find if the number is greater than the next element \ for num in range(1, len(number)): # Handling [case 1] and [case 2] if number[num-1] == digit: if int(number[num]) > int(number[num-1]): return number[:num-1] + number[num:] else: last_index = num - 1 # If digit is the last number (last occurence) in the string [case 3] if number[-1] == digit: last_index = len(number) - 1 return number[:last_index] + number[last_index + 1:]
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
🔥🔥🔥Python O(N) solution || Faster than 99% submissions || Detailed explanation.
litdatascience
16
1,400
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,224
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/1996355/Python-3-Brute-Force-Easy-Solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: ans = 0 for i, dig in enumerate(list(number)): if dig == digit: ans = max(ans, int(number[:i]+number[i+1:])) return str(ans)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
[Python 3] Brute Force Easy Solution
hari19041
9
613
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,225
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/1996949/Easy-Solution-oror-O(n)
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: l=[] for i in range(len(number)): if number[i]==digit: l.append(int(number[:i]+number[i+1:])) return str(max(l))
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Easy Solution || O(n)
a_dityamishra
2
66
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,226
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2074471/Python-3-Brute-Force-Single-Statment
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: return max ( number[:i] + number[i+1:] for i in range(len(number)) if number[i] == digit )
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
[Python 3] Brute Force - Single Statment
Lindelt
1
81
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,227
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2033135/Python-solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: ans = [] for ind,i in enumerate(number): if i == digit: ans.append(int(number[:ind]+number[ind+1:])) return str(max(ans))
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python solution
StikS32
1
129
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,228
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/1996778/python-easy-solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: last = -1 for i in range (len(number)) : if number[i] == digit : last = i if i != len(number) - 1 and number[i] < number[i+1] : return number[0:i] + number[i+1:] return number[0:last] + number[last+1:]
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
python - easy solution
ZX007java
1
256
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,229
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2845059/python
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: ans = '0' for i, num in enumerate(number): if num == digit: ans = max(number[:i] + number[i + 1:], ans) return ans
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
python
xy01
0
2
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,230
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2811483/Python3-oror-Easy-solution-using-String-Slicing
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: ans=[] for i in range(len(number)): if number[i] ==digit: s=number[:i]+number[i+1:] ans.append(int(s)) return str(max(ans))
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
[Python3] || Easy solution using String Slicing
divyanshuan
0
3
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,231
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2801137/Python-Solution%3A-Using-Join-Method
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: l=[x for x in number] large=0 for i in range (len(l)): if l[i] == digit: n=''.join(l[:i])+''.join(l[i+1:]) if(int(n)>large): large=int(n) return str(large)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python Solution: Using Join Method
CharuArora_
0
2
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,232
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2781970/Python-solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: maxi = 0 for i in range(len(number)): if number[i]==digit: if maxi< int(number[:i]+number[i+1:]): maxi = int(number[:i]+number[i+1:]) return str(maxi)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python solution
Rajeev_varma008
0
4
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,233
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2705095/Easy-to-Understand-or-Python
class Solution(object): def removeDigit(self, number, digit): ans = 0 for i in range(len(number)): if number[i] == digit: temp = number[:i] + number[i+1:] if int(temp) > ans: ans = int(temp) return str(ans)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Easy to Understand | Python
its_krish_here
0
6
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,234
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2703141/Python%3A-Single-for-and-if-statement-solution-with-comments
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: #iterate through the number hold = number arr = [] for i in range(0, len(number)): number = hold #if digit is found, "remove" the current digit, and put everything before number[i] and #everything after number [i] into the arr if number[i] == digit: arr.append(number[:i]+number[i+1:]) #use a bulit in max function to return the maximum value in all stored values return max(arr)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python: Single for and if statement solution with comments
findarian1
0
4
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,235
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2688986/Simple-Python-Solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: arr=[] n=len(number) for i in range(n): if number[i]==digit: arr.append(int(number[:i]+number[i+1:])) return str(max(arr))
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Simple Python Solution
Siddharth_singh
0
5
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,236
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2666909/Easy-and-optimal
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: res=0 for i in range(0,len(number)): if(number[i]==digit): d=int(number[:i]+number[i+1:]) res=max(res,d) return str(res)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Easy and optimal
Raghunath_Reddy
0
3
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,237
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2614068/Python-Simple-Python-Solution-Using-Brute-Force
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: result = 0 for i in range(len(number)): if number[i] == digit: new_number = number[:i] + number[i+1:] result = max(result, int(new_number)) return str(result)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
[ Python ] ✅✅ Simple Python Solution Using Brute Force🥳✌👍
ASHOK_KUMAR_MEGHVANSHI
0
23
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,238
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2457988/3-liner-python-solution-99.73-faster
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: ans = '' for i in range(len(number)): if number[i] == digit: ans = max(ans, number[:i]+number[i+1:]) return ans
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
3 liner python solution, 99.73% faster
yash921
0
90
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,239
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2328727/Python-easy-Solution-or-O(Nor1)-or-No-Slicing
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: mark,found = -1,0 number = list(number) for i in range(len(number)): if i!=len(number)-1 and number[i]==digit: if int(number[i+1])>int(number[i]): mark = i found = -1 break elif int(number[i+1])<int(number[i]): mark = i if number[len(number)-1] == digit and found==0: mark = len(number)-1 number.pop(mark) ans = "".join(number) return ans
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python easy Solution | O(N|1) | No Slicing
user7457RV
0
52
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,240
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2248744/Python-Solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: result = '' for i in range(len(number)): if number[i] == digit: result = max(number[:i] + number[i + 1:], result) return result
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python Solution
hgalytoby
0
67
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,241
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2248744/Python-Solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: i = number.find(digit) result = '' while i != -1: result = max(number[:i] + number[i + 1:], result) i = number.find(digit, i + 1) return result
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python Solution
hgalytoby
0
67
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,242
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2159123/Python-oror-Straight-Forward
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: max_ = '0' for i, l in enumerate(number): if l == digit: if number[:i] + number[i+1:] > max_: max_ = number[:i] + number[i+1:] return max_
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python || Straight Forward
morpheusdurden
0
137
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,243
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2017064/Easy-Solution-python3
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: res="" for x in range(len(number)): if number[x]==digit: if x<len(number)-1: if number[x]<number[x+1]: return number[0:x]+number[x+1:] for x in range(len(number)-1,-1,-1): if number[x]==digit: return number[0:x]+number[x+1:]
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Easy Solution python3
moazmar
0
84
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,244
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2015393/Python-easy-solution-for-beginners
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: res_nums = set() pos = 0 for i in range(number.count(digit)): ind = number.index(digit, pos, len(number)) res = number[:ind] + number[ind+1:] if int(res) not in res_nums: res_nums.add(int(res)) pos = ind + 1 return str(max(res_nums))
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python easy solution for beginners
alishak1999
0
74
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,245
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2013546/Python-Easy-To-Understand-Solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: s, index = "", -1 for i in range(len(number)): if number[i] == digit: temp = number[0 : i] + number[i + 1 :] if s != "": if int(s) < int(temp): index, s = i, temp else: s = temp return s
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python Easy To Understand Solution
Hejita
0
54
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,246
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/2003767/Python-Clean-and-Simple!
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, num, digit): maxNum = 0 for i,c in enumerate(num): if c == digit: newNum = int(num[:i]+num[i+1:]) maxNum = max(maxNum, newNum) return str(maxNum)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python - Clean and Simple!
domthedeveloper
0
80
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,247
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/1998155/Python-one-liner
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: return max(number[:i]+number[i+1:] for i, c in enumerate(number) if c == digit)
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python one liner
blue_sky5
0
42
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,248
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/1996526/python-3-oror-simple-O(n)
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: last = -1 n = len(number) for i in range(n - 1): if number[i] == digit: if number[i] < number[i + 1]: return number[:i] + number[i + 1:] last = i if number[n - 1] == digit: last = n - 1 return number[:last] + number[last + 1:]
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
python 3 || simple O(n)
dereky4
0
71
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,249
https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result/discuss/1996444/Python-beginner-friendly-solution
class Solution: def removeDigit(self, number: str, digit: str) -> str: res_nums = set() pos = 0 for i in range(number.count(digit)): ind = number.index(digit, pos, len(number)) res = number[:ind] + number[ind+1:] if int(res) not in res_nums: res_nums.add(int(res)) pos = ind + 1 return str(max(res_nums))
remove-digit-from-number-to-maximize-result
Python beginner friendly solution
alishak1999
0
52
remove digit from number to maximize result
2,259
0.47
Easy
31,250
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/1996393/Python3-or-Beginner-friendly-explained-or
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: minPick = float('inf') seen = {} for i, n in enumerate(cards): if n in seen: if i - seen[n] + 1 < minPick: minPick = i - seen[n] + 1 seen[n] = i if minPick == float('inf'): return -1 return minPick
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python3 | Beginner-friendly explained |
hanjo108
22
919
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,251
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2729646/Python3-or-HashMaps
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: HashMap={} lengths=[] for i,j in enumerate(cards): if j in HashMap: lengths.append(abs(HashMap[j]-i)+1) HashMap[j]=i else: HashMap[j]=i if len(lengths)>0: return min(lengths) else: return -1``
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python3 | HashMaps
gpavanik
1
62
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,252
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2099186/PYTHON-oror-EASY-oror-SET-and-DICTIONARY
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, a: List[int]) -> int: d=set() s={} n=len(a) for i in range(n): if a[i] in s: d.add(a[i]) s[a[i]].append(i) else: s[a[i]]=[i] if len(d)==0: return -1 for i in d: for j in range(len(s[i])-1): n=min(n,s[i][j+1]-s[i][j]) return n+1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
🐍 PYTHON 🐍 || EASY || SET & DICTIONARY
karan_8082
1
71
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,253
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/1996822/python-easy-hash-solution
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: table = dict() answer = len(cards) for i in range (len(cards)) : if cards[i] in table : answer = min(answer, i - table[cards[i]]) table[cards[i]] = i if answer == len(cards) : answer = -2 return answer + 1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
python - easy hash solution
ZX007java
1
62
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,254
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2846080/Py-Hash-O(N)
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: cards_dict = defaultdict(list) ans = float("inf") for i in range(len(cards)): cards_dict[cards[i]].append(i) for key in cards_dict: arr = cards_dict[key] for j in range(len(arr) - 1): ans = min(ans, (arr[j + 1] - arr[j] + 1)) return ans if ans < float("inf") else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Py Hash O(N)
haly-leshchuk
0
1
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,255
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2823135/Python-solution-using-dictionaries
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: from collections import defaultdict mydict = defaultdict(list) for i,aCard in enumerate(cards): mydict[aCard].append(i) mydict = dict([(k,v) for k,v in mydict.items() if len(v)>1]) smallest = 1e9 target = -1 for k,v in mydict.items(): for i in range(len(v) - 1): if (v[i+1 ] -v[i] +1) < smallest: smallest = v[i+1] -v[i] +1 target = k if smallest ==1e9: return -1 else: return smallest
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python solution using dictionaries
user5580aS
0
1
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,256
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2798274/Python%3A-Easy-Sliding-Window-Using-Set
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: left = 0 right = 0 _min = math.inf s = set() while right < len(cards): if cards[right] in s: while left < right and cards[right] in s: _min = min(right - left + 1, _min) s.remove(cards[left]) left += 1 s.add(cards[right]) right += 1 return -1 if _min == math.inf else _min
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python: Easy Sliding Window Using Set
supreethshaker
0
2
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,257
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2780096/Python-easy-solution
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: seen = {} length = inf n = len(cards) for i in range(n): if cards[i] in seen: length = min(length, i-seen.get(cards[i])+1) seen[cards[i]] = i return length if length!=inf else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python easy solution
dhanu084
0
3
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,258
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2645345/python-simple-sliding-window-solution-O(n)
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: minimal = float('inf') count = {} sW = 0 for eW in range(len(cards)): count[cards[eW]] = 1 + count.get(cards[eW], 0) # print(cards[sW:eW+1]) while count[cards[eW]] > 1: count[cards[sW]] -= 1 minimal = eW - sW + 1 if minimal > eW - sW +1 else minimal sW += 1 return minimal if minimal != float('inf') else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
python simple sliding window solution O(n)
bilal12542
0
4
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,259
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2639267/Easy-solution-in-O(n)-or-Python-or-HashMap
class Solution(object): def minimumCardPickup(self, cards): """ :type cards: List[int] :rtype: int """ windowStart=0 minimum=float("inf") hashMap = {} for i in range(len(cards)): if cards[i] not in hashMap: hashMap[cards[i]]=i else: minimum = abs(min(minimum, i-hashMap[cards[i]]+1)) #of two same values are togather if minimum == 2: return minimum hashMap[cards[i]]=i return minimum if minimum != float("inf") else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Easy solution in O(n) | Python | HashMap
msherazedu
0
9
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,260
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2614470/Python-one-pass-solution-or-O(n)
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: if len(cards) == len(set(cards)): #saves time return -1 pos = {} # to store the indexs res = float('inf') for i in range(len(cards)): if cards[i] in pos: #if the current value appears the first time add it to dictionary res = min(res, (i- pos[cards[i]]) + 1) #take the minimum pos[cards[i]] = i else: pos[cards[i]] = i return res if res != inf else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python one pass solution | O(n)
pandish
0
12
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,261
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2433358/python-most-efficient(97-beats)-and-short-soln-using-hashmap-dictionary
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: d={} ans=float('inf') for i in range(len(cards)): if cards[i] in d: if i-d[cards[i]]+1 <ans: ans=i-d[cards[i]]+1 d[cards[i]]=i else: d[cards[i]] =i return ans if ans!=float('inf') else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
python most efficient(97% beats) and short soln using hashmap dictionary
benon
0
39
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,262
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2159133/Python-oror-Easy-Solution
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: seen = defaultdict(int) min_ = inf for i, c in enumerate(cards): if c in seen: min_ = min( i - seen[c] + 1, min_) seen[c] = i if min_ != inf: return min_ else: return - 1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python || Easy Solution
morpheusdurden
0
79
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,263
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2127780/Python-3-Interview-Answer-or-Clean-and-Easy-Readability
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: seen, left, result = {}, 0, math.inf for right in range(len(cards)): if cards[right] in seen: result = min(result, right - seen[cards[right]] + 1) left += 1 seen[cards[right]] = right return result if result != math.inf else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
[Python 3] Interview Answer | Clean & Easy Readability
Cut
0
38
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,264
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2127780/Python-3-Interview-Answer-or-Clean-and-Easy-Readability
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: seen, left, result = {}, 0, math.inf for i, num in enumerate(cards): if num in seen: result = min(result, i - seen[num] + 1) left += 1 seen[num] = i return result if result != math.inf else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
[Python 3] Interview Answer | Clean & Easy Readability
Cut
0
38
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,265
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2015757/Python-3-Easy-Index-Hash-Map-Solution
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: indices = defaultdict(list) for i, card in enumerate(cards): indices[card].append(i) ans = inf for idx, inds in indices.items(): for i in range(1, len(inds)): ans = min(ans, inds[i]-inds[i-1]+1) if ans == inf: return -1 return ans
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
[Python 3] Easy Index Hash Map Solution
hari19041
0
30
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,266
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2009434/python-3-oror-hash-map-solution-oror-O(n)O(n)
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: cardIndices = {} res = len(cards) + 1 for i, card in enumerate(cards): if card in cardIndices: res = min(res, i - cardIndices[card] + 1) cardIndices[card] = i return res if res != len(cards) + 1 else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
python 3 || hash map solution || O(n)/O(n)
dereky4
0
23
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,267
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/2002089/Python-or-Track-last-occurrence-or-O(n)
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: mapping = {} shortest = -1 for i, card in enumerate(cards): if card in mapping: if shortest == -1: shortest = i-mapping[card] + 1 else: shortest = min(shortest, i - mapping[card] + 1) mapping[card] = i return shortest
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python | Track last occurrence | O(n)
shamydin
0
25
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,268
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/1999088/Python3-Sliding-Window-O(n)-Solution
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: #sliding window dicts = {} start = 0 res = sys.maxsize while start < len(cards): target = cards[start] if target not in dicts: dicts[target] = start else: res = min(res, start - dicts[target] + 1) dicts[target] = start start += 1 return res if res != sys.maxsize else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python3 Sliding Window O(n) Solution
xxHRxx
0
26
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,269
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/1996968/Easy-Python-Solution-oror-O(n)
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: d=dict() l=[] for i in range(len(cards)): """ If cards[i] not found in d means it is coming first time """ if d.get(cards[i])==None: d[cards[i]]=i """ If found means 2 or third occurence subtract index of previous one and this one and add 1 to it as this is inclusive range """ elif d.get(cards[i])!=None: l.append(i-d[cards[i]]+1) """ Update d[cards[i]] so that if more numbers will come they have updated value to calculate """ d[cards[i]]=i if len(l)>0: return min(l) return -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Easy Python Solution || O(n)
a_dityamishra
0
27
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,270
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/1996686/Python-Track-Last-Index-using-Hashset
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: last_index = defaultdict(int) # store last index of a card res = math.inf for i,x in enumerate(cards): # if a pair is found, calculate the number of cards using last_index dict if x in last_index: res = min(res, i - last_index[x]+1) last_index[x] = i return -1 if res == math.inf else res
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python - Track Last Index using Hashset
constantine786
0
14
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,271
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/1996527/Python-O(N)-Time-oror-Easy-to-Understand-oror-Straight-forward-solution
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: occur = {} for i, val in enumerate(cards): if(val in occur): occur[val].append(i) else: occur[val] = [i] print(occur) dist = float("inf") for key, val_list in occur.items(): if len(val_list) == 1: continue else: for i in range(len(val_list)-1): dist = min(dist, val_list[i+1] - val_list[i] + 1) return dist if dist != float("inf") else -1
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python O(N) Time || Easy to Understand || Straight forward solution
shiva1gandluri
0
21
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,272
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/1996255/Python-Solution
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: d = {} ans = -1 for i in range(len(cards)): if cards[i] in d: if ans != -1: ans = min(i - d[cards[i]] + 1, ans) else: ans = i - d[cards[i]] + 1 d[cards[i]] = i return ans
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python Solution
user6397p
0
23
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,273
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up/discuss/1996207/Python-or-Easy-to-Understand
class Solution: def minimumCardPickup(self, cards: List[int]) -> int: dic = defaultdict(int) min_num = float('inf') for i, num in enumerate(cards): if num not in dic: dic[num] = i else: min_num = min(min_num, i - dic[num] + 1) dic[num] = i if min_num == float('inf'): return -1 else: return min_num
minimum-consecutive-cards-to-pick-up
Python | Easy to Understand
Mikey98
0
37
minimum consecutive cards to pick up
2,260
0.517
Medium
31,274
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/1996643/Python-Simple-Count-all-combinations
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: n = len(nums) sub_arrays = set() # generate all combinations of subarray for start in range(n): cnt = 0 temp = '' for i in range(start, n): if nums[i]%p == 0: cnt+=1 temp+=str(nums[i]) + ',' # build the sequence subarray in CSV format if cnt>k: # check for termination break sub_arrays.add(temp) return len(sub_arrays)
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
✅ Python - Simple Count all combinations
constantine786
20
885
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,275
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/1996394/Python3-Backtracking
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: def dfs(idx, k, path): nonlocal res, visited if idx == len(nums): visited.add(tuple(path[:])) return if nums[idx] % p == 0 and k > 0: path.append(nums[idx]) if tuple(path) not in visited: visited.add(tuple(path)) res += 1 dfs(idx + 1, k - 1, path) elif nums[idx] % p != 0: path.append(nums[idx]) if tuple(path) not in visited: visited.add(tuple(path)) res += 1 dfs(idx + 1, k, path) res = 0 visited = set() for i in range(len(nums)): dfs(i, k, []) return res
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
[Python3] Backtracking
alanlihy1805
2
74
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,276
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/2732292/Python3-Rolling-Hash-Simple-Solution
class Solution: POW = 397 MODULO = 100000000069 def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: arr = list(map(lambda x: 1 if x % p == 0 else 0, nums)) ans_set = set[int]() for i in range(len(arr)): cnt_one = 0 hash1 = 0 for j in range(i, len(arr)): hash1 = (hash1 * Solution.POW + nums[j] + (j + 1 - i)) % Solution.MODULO if arr[j] == 1: cnt_one += 1 if cnt_one <= k: ans_set.add(hash1) else: break return len(ans_set)
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
[Python3] Rolling Hash Simple Solution
huangweijing
1
94
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,277
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/2002206/Easily-implemented-using-Trie
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: trie = {} cnt = 0 for i in range(len(nums)): count = 0 divis = 0 #contain count of element in array divisible by p d = trie for j in range(i,len(nums)): if nums[j] % p == 0: divis += 1 if divis > k: break if nums[j] not in d: d[nums[j]] = {} count += 1 d = d[nums[j]] cnt += count #count contain all subarrays that can be made from nums[i:j] return cnt```
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Easily implemented using Trie
rohit_vishwas_
1
118
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,278
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/2833480/Python-(Simple-Maths)
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums, k, p): n, seen = len(nums), set() for i in range(n): s, count = "", 0 for j in range(i,n): if nums[j]%p == 0: count += 1 if count > k: break s += str(nums[j]) + "#" seen.add(s) return len(seen)
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Python (Simple Maths)
rnotappl
0
2
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,279
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/2780155/Python-soltion-using-set
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: n = len(nums) res = 0 seen = set() for i in range(n): divisible = 0 for j in range(i,n): divisible+=1 if nums[j]%p == 0 else 0 if divisible > k: break subarray = tuple(nums[i:j+1]) if subarray in seen: continue seen.add(subarray) res+=1 return res
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Python soltion using set
dhanu084
0
7
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,280
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/2159136/Python-oror-Straight-Forward
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: n = len(nums) seen = set() for i in range(n): for j in range(i,n): count = 0 for l in range(i,j+1): if nums[l]%p == 0: count += 1 if count <= k: seen.add(tuple(nums[i:j+1])) return len(seen)
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Python || Straight Forward
morpheusdurden
0
101
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,281
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/2025972/Python-Simple-DFS
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: ans = [] past = set() def dfs(path, ind): tmp = 0 for s in path: if int(s)%p == 0: tmp += 1 if tmp <= k and tuple(path) not in past: ans.append(path) past.add(tuple(path)) if ind+1 < len(nums): dfs(path + [nums[ind+1]], ind+1) for i in range(len(nums)): dfs([nums[i]], i) return len(ans)
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Python Simple DFS
yseeker
0
115
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,282
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/1999168/Python3-Hashmap-%2B-prefix-sum-O(n2)-Solution
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: flag = [] for element in nums: if element % p == 0: flag.append(1) else: flag.append(0) added = set() prefix_sum = [0] start = 0 for element in flag: start += element prefix_sum.append(start) for i in range(1, len(nums)+1): for j in range(i, len(nums)+1): target = prefix_sum[j] - prefix_sum[i-1] arr = tuple(nums[i-1:j]) if target <= k and tuple(arr) not in added: added.add(tuple(arr)) return len(added)
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Python3 Hashmap + prefix sum O(n^2) Solution
xxHRxx
0
33
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,283
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/1998963/Python-Solution
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: from collections import defaultdict arr=defaultdict(int) answer=0 count=0 for i in range(len(nums)): count=0 res='' for j in range(i,len(nums)): if nums[j]%p!=0: res+=(str(nums[j])+'*') if arr[res]==0: answer+=1 arr[res]=1 else: count+=1 res += (str(nums[j])+'*') if count<=k: if arr[res] == 0: answer += 1 arr[res] = 1 else: break return answer
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Python Solution
g0urav
0
32
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,284
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/1996249/Python-or-Easy-to-Understand
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: used = set() n = len(nums) count = 0 for i in range(n): divisible_num = 0 s = [] for j in range(i, n): if nums[j] % p == 0: divisible_num += 1 if divisible_num <= k: s.append(nums[j]) if tuple(s) not in used: used.add(tuple(s)) count += 1 else: continue elif divisible_num > k: break return count
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Python | Easy to Understand
Mikey98
0
59
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,285
https://leetcode.com/problems/k-divisible-elements-subarrays/discuss/1996594/Python-O(N2)-Time-oror-Hashset
class Solution: def countDistinct(self, nums: List[int], k: int, p: int) -> int: result = set() N = len(nums) K = k for i in range(N): k = K for j in range(i,N): if k>0: if nums[j] % p == 0: k -= 1 s = str(nums[i:j+1]) if s not in result: result.add(s) elif nums[j] % p != 0: s = str(nums[i:j+1]) if s not in result: result.add(s) else: break return len(result)
k-divisible-elements-subarrays
Python O(N^2) Time || Hashset
shiva1gandluri
-1
117
k divisible elements subarrays
2,261
0.476
Medium
31,286
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/1996203/DP
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: res, cur, prev = 0, 0, defaultdict(lambda: -1) for i, ch in enumerate(s): cur += i - prev[ch] prev[ch] = i res += cur return res
total-appeal-of-a-string
DP
votrubac
245
10,100
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,287
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/1996300/Python3-or-O(N)-O(1)-or-detail-for-beginners
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: lastSeenMap = {s[0]: 0} prev, curr, res = 1, 0, 1 for i in range(1, len(s)): if s[i] in lastSeenMap: curr = prev + (i - lastSeenMap[s[i]]) else: curr = prev + (i + 1) res += curr prev = curr lastSeenMap[s[i]] = i return res
total-appeal-of-a-string
Python3 | O(N) / O(1) | detail for beginners
hanjo108
93
3,400
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,288
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/1999226/Combinatorics
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: res, n, prev = 0, len(s), defaultdict(lambda: -1) for i, ch in enumerate(s): res += (i - prev[ch]) * (n - i) prev[ch] = i return res
total-appeal-of-a-string
Combinatorics
votrubac
62
3,400
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,289
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/1996270/Python-Hashmap-O(N)-Solution-with-Detailed-Explanations-Clean-and-Concise
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: n = len(s) dp = [0] * n dp[0] = 1 hashmap = {s[0]: 0} for i in range(1, n): if s[i] not in hashmap: dp[i] = dp[i - 1] + (i + 1) hashmap[s[i]] = i else: dp[i] = dp[i - 1] + (i - hashmap[s[i]]) hashmap[s[i]] = i return sum(dp)
total-appeal-of-a-string
[Python] Hashmap O(N) Solution with Detailed Explanations, Clean & Concise
xil899
6
294
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,290
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/1996270/Python-Hashmap-O(N)-Solution-with-Detailed-Explanations-Clean-and-Concise
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: n = len(s) curSum, cumSum = 1, 1 hashmap = {s[0]: 0} for i in range(1, n): if s[i] not in hashmap: curSum += i + 1 else: curSum += i - hashmap[s[i]] cumSum += curSum hashmap[s[i]] = i return cumSum
total-appeal-of-a-string
[Python] Hashmap O(N) Solution with Detailed Explanations, Clean & Concise
xil899
6
294
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,291
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/1996330/Python-or-Hashtable-One-Pass-O(n)-with-Illustration
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: prev = {} total, curr = 0, 0 for i, c in enumerate(s): if c in prev: curr += i + 1 - (prev[c]) prev[c] = (i + 1) else: prev[c] = (i+1) curr += i + 1 total += curr return total
total-appeal-of-a-string
Python | Hashtable One Pass O(n) with Illustration
owen1605
3
242
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,292
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/2098355/Python-Solution-with-Explanation
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: pre = [-1] * 26 ans = 0 n = len(s) for i in range(n): ans += (i - pre[ord(s[i]) - 97]) * (n - i) pre[ord(s[i]) - 97] = i return ans
total-appeal-of-a-string
Python Solution with Explanation
k3232908
1
191
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,293
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/1996754/python-3-oror-dynamic-programming-oror-O(n)O(1)
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: last = collections.defaultdict(lambda: 0) curAppeal = totalAppeal = 0 for i, c in enumerate(s): curAppeal += i + 1 - last[c] last[c] = i + 1 totalAppeal += curAppeal return totalAppeal
total-appeal-of-a-string
python 3 || dynamic programming || O(n)/O(1)
dereky4
1
61
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,294
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/2774285/7-Line-Python-DP-O(N)-Time-O(1)-Space
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: pre, ans, last_i = 0, 0, [-1] * 26 for i in range(len(s)): order = ord(s[i]) - ord('a') pre += i - last_i[order] ans += pre last_i[order] = i return ans
total-appeal-of-a-string
7 Line Python / DP / O(N) Time / O(1) Space
GregHuang
0
4
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,295
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/2564449/Python-simple-one-pass
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: n = len(s) prev = [-1] * n index = {} for i, c in enumerate(s): if c in index: prev[i] = index[c] index[c] = i res = 0 for i, c in enumerate(s): res += (n - i) * (i - prev[i]) return res
total-appeal-of-a-string
Python simple one pass
shubhamnishad25
0
115
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,296
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/2043129/DP-Python
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: # dp # f(i): appeal for all substr end at i # f(i) = f(i-1) + (i - last_index[s[i]]) last_index = collections.defaultdict(lambda: -1) last_appeal = total_appeal = 0 for i, char in enumerate(s): last_appeal += i - last_index[char] total_appeal += last_appeal last_index[char] = i return total_appeal
total-appeal-of-a-string
DP - Python
bz2342
0
85
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,297
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/2003801/Python-Solution
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: from collections import defaultdict arr=defaultdict(int) result=0 for i in range(len(s)): arr[s[i]]=i+1 result+=(sum(arr.values())) return result
total-appeal-of-a-string
Python Solution
g0urav
0
62
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,298
https://leetcode.com/problems/total-appeal-of-a-string/discuss/1998363/Python-3Hint-solution-O(n*26)
class Solution: def appealSum(self, s: str) -> int: n = len(s) vis = {} ans = 0 for i in range(n+1): for k in vis: ans += 1 + vis[k] if i < n: vis[s[i]] = i return ans
total-appeal-of-a-string
[Python 3]Hint solution O(n*26)
chestnut890123
0
42
total appeal of a string
2,262
0.583
Hard
31,299