status
stringclasses 1
value | repo_name
stringclasses 13
values | repo_url
stringclasses 13
values | issue_id
int64 1
104k
| updated_files
stringlengths 11
1.76k
| title
stringlengths 4
369
| body
stringlengths 0
254k
⌀ | issue_url
stringlengths 38
55
| pull_url
stringlengths 38
53
| before_fix_sha
stringlengths 40
40
| after_fix_sha
stringlengths 40
40
| report_datetime
unknown | language
stringclasses 5
values | commit_datetime
unknown |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,860 | ["packages/next/server/image-optimizer.ts"] | "ENOENT: no such file or directory" - next.js crashes, related to image caching? | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
```
root@1d90163fc150:/app# npx --no-install next info
/bin/sh: 1: pnpm: not found
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Arch: x64
Version: #1 SMP Debian 4.19.171-2 (2021-01-30)
Binaries:
Node: 17.4.0
npm: 8.3.1
Yarn: 1.22.17
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.10
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.10
### What version of Node.js are you using?
17.4.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Debian
### How are you deploying your application?
next build
### Describe the Bug
Upgraded my site to next.js 12.0.10 and with the new release started getting errors;
```
today at 2:27:38 PMready - started server on 0.0.0.0:3000, url: http://localhost:3000
today at 2:27:38 PMinfo - Loaded env from /app/.env.production
today at 2:27:38 PMinfo - Loaded env from /app/.env
today at 2:27:39 PMwarn - SWC minify beta enabled. https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/swc-minify-enabled
today at 2:37:32 PMError: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/app/.next/cache/images/iLU6LIXA6TCl8SepFjJ5LNbyzLiOqZ7U49T1Ftm+jW4=/0.1643714865404.blKDVxGlp5+pf7TBeZBnD7i-BF2A5hQCHH0jGL--cVU=.avif'
```
and then next server dies and restarts
### Expected Behavior
shouldn't be crashing.
### To Reproduce
any code with avif + image caching support i guess | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33860 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33883 | aae0370d63bb8f39ad0eace63e0c50897960d4bc | e3e62aa78673f8819583f56eb43c5cc9b4b9dd78 | "2022-02-01T11:46:51Z" | javascript | "2022-02-02T21:27:56Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,856 | ["packages/eslint-plugin-next/lib/rules/link-passhref.js", "test/unit/eslint-plugin-next/link-passhref.test.ts"] | eslint rule link-passhref does not work | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
_No response_
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.9
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16
### What browser are you using?
chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
eslint rule `link-passhref` which is part of `next/recommended` does not work as expected.
consider the following example:
```
import NextLink from 'next/link'
export const Home = () => (
<NextLink href="/test">
<StyledLink>Test</StyledLink>
</NextLink>
)
```
According to the rule it should be able to catch this error
### Expected Behavior
eslint should show an error
### To Reproduce
Use the example from describtiondescription | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33856 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33857 | 3e60c232a86d2c3b40a45a427f1d32a85b89daf7 | a7793c7a0c5c5e4496594a3010152cfba31920de | "2022-02-01T10:42:47Z" | javascript | "2022-02-01T18:53:55Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,854 | [".github/workflows/build_test_deploy.yml", "packages/next-swc/.cargo/config.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/npm/android-arm-eabi/README.md", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/npm/android-arm-eabi/package.json", "packages/next-swc/package.json", "packages/next/package.json", "scripts/install-native.mjs", "yarn.lock"] | "next build" fails in environments with glibc < 2.18 | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
```
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Arch: x64
Version: #1 SMP Sat Jul 3 21:51:47 UTC 2021
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.2
npm: 8.1.2
Yarn: 1.22.17
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.10-canary.2
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.10
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.2
### What browser are you using?
none
### What operating system are you using?
Linux (Docker image based on CentOS 7)
### How are you deploying your application?
Other
### Describe the Bug
When I run `next build`, I get the error ``"/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.18' not found"`` and cannot build.
It seems to have been fixed in swc (https://github.com/swc-project/swc/pull/3314), so I would like to see it taken into the `@next/swc` package if possible.
```
$ # yarn run build
yarn run v1.22.17
$ next build
Attention: Next.js now collects completely anonymous telemetry regarding usage.
This information is used to shape Next.js' roadmap and prioritize features.
You can learn more, including how to opt-out if you'd not like to participate in this anonymous program, by visiting the following URL:
https://nextjs.org/telemetry
info - Checking validity of types
info - Attempted to load @next/swc-linux-x64-gnu, but an error occurred: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.18' not found (required by /src/app/node_modules/@next/swc-linux-x64-gnu/next-swc.linux-x64-gnu.node)
info - Attempted to load @next/swc-linux-x64-gnux32, but it was not installed
info - Attempted to load @next/swc-linux-x64-musl, but an error occurred: libc.musl-x86_64.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
error - Failed to load SWC binary for linux/x64, see more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/failed-loading-swc
error Command failed with exit code 1.
info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.
```
```
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)
$ yum list installed | grep glibc
glibc.x86_64 2.17-325.el7_9 @updates
glibc-common.x86_64 2.17-325.el7_9 @updates
glibc-devel.x86_64 2.17-325.el7_9 @updates
glibc-headers.x86_64 2.17-325.el7_9 @updates
```
### Expected Behavior
Execution of `next build` succeeds even if GLIBC < 2.18.
### To Reproduce
Run `next build` on CentOS 7 Docker image
in host OS
```
$ docker pull centos:7
$ docker run --rm -it centos:7 /bin/bash
```
in docker
```
# yum install gcc
# yum update
# curl -fsSL https://rpm.nodesource.com/setup_16.x | bash -
# yum install -y nodejs
# npx create-next-app@latest --typescript
# npm run build
``` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33854 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/34481 | ce76d1712e98d7310385c89ec1917242f7c5111c | 924b71ccc16c434005c0f4111e86d658734c0133 | "2022-02-01T10:33:25Z" | javascript | "2022-02-18T16:04:43Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,829 | ["packages/next/export/index.ts", "packages/next/pages/_document.tsx", "packages/next/server/base-server.ts", "packages/next/server/config-shared.ts", "packages/next/server/render.tsx", "packages/next/shared/lib/html-context.ts", "test/e2e/prerender.test.ts", "test/e2e/prerender/pages/large-page-data.js"] | Show warning during build if page is returning a large amount of data | ### Describe the feature you'd like to request
Following up from https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/29956, let's consider adding this for `next build`.
### Describe the solution you'd like
A warning is outputted during `next build` similar to local devl.
### Describe alternatives you've considered
See thread for context: https://twitter.com/ascorbic/status/1487024158492049408 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33829 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37264 | 5739edc7cf5e9a3ba41054c5c701e8ddbe7607ed | 39302141b5ea3a1e9a55af906129a44675337cf9 | "2022-01-31T16:24:46Z" | javascript | "2022-05-29T01:39:48Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,809 | ["package.json", "packages/next/client/image.tsx", "test/integration/image-component/default/pages/_document.js", "test/integration/image-component/default/pages/valid-html-w3c.js", "test/integration/image-component/default/test/index.test.js", "yarn.lock"] | next/image produces invalid HTML according to W3C (again) | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Arch: x64
Version: #29-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 12 17:36:47 UTC 2022
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.2
npm: 8.3.2
Yarn: 1.22.15
pnpm: 6.11.0
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.9
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.9
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.2
### What browser are you using?
N/A
### What operating system are you using?
N/A
### How are you deploying your application?
N/A
### Describe the Bug
Using `[email protected]` yields no invalid HTML errors on the [W3C Markup Validation Service](https://validator.w3.org/) about `next/image`.
After upgrading to `[email protected]`, there is now this kind of error:
```txt
Error: Bad value data:image/svg+xml,%3csvg xmlns=%27http://www.w3.org/2000/svg%27 version=%271.1%27 width=%271000%27 height=%271000%27/%3e
for attribute src on element img: Illegal character in scheme data: space is not allowed.
```

There was already an error similar to this one before but that has been fixed: #18850
We might add a new e2e test or CI job to ensure that next produces valid HTML according to W3C, so it's not happening again as it is the case now...
### Expected Behavior
No errors. Valid HTML according to W3C.
### To Reproduce
1. `npx create-next-app --example image-component image-app`
2. `cd image-app`
3. `npm run build`
4. `npm run start`
5. Go to `localhost:3000` and copy/paste the HTML in [The W3C Markup Validation Service](https://validator.w3.org/) or use the [
html-w3c-validator CLI](https://github.com/Divlo/html-w3c-validator). | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33809 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33825 | b00270b1abcabf5ef463553bd868f5b3d233d8ca | e0095faf23797d537a2ce9cbc57235cf9306931c | "2022-01-30T13:38:34Z" | javascript | "2022-02-01T00:13:46Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,754 | ["docs/testing.md"] | Docs: Misspelling in testing documentation | ### What is the improvement or update you wish to see?
> Styleheets and images aren't used in the tests but importing them may cause errors, so they will need to be mocked. Create the mock files referenced in the configuration above - fileMock.js and styleMock.js - inside a __mocks__ directory:
In Testing documentation in sentence reffered above there is misspelling.
### Is there any context that might help us understand?
The first word `Styleheets` is misspelled, it suppose to be `Stylesheets`.
### Does the docs page already exist? Please link to it.
https://nextjs.org/docs/testing | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33754 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33755 | 7b2ea487458b56e668523c4a0387ad86b6ad36bd | c2b6d235f2635ae8ea4fa8519f64bcc70830f40d | "2022-01-27T21:57:49Z" | javascript | "2022-01-27T22:12:55Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,696 | ["packages/next/build/index.ts", "test/production/required-server-files.test.ts"] | Output file tracing - server.js compression false | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: darwin
Arch: x64
Version: Darwin Kernel Version 20.6.0: Tue Oct 12 18:33:42 PDT 2021; root:xnu-7195.141.8~1/RELEASE_X86_64
Binaries:
Node: 16.11.0
npm: 8.0.0
Yarn: N/A
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.11.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Docker on Azure
### Describe the Bug
We are currently using the automatic copying of traced files from the output standalone (https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/output-file-tracing#automatically-copying-traced-files-experimental).
This is working great so far.
We are using the generated `server.js` to serve our application.
However, we noticed our resources were not being compressed automatically anymore, which was the case when we were still using `next start` before.
When I have a look in the `server.js` file which is generated, I noticed that the `compress` configuration option was `false` by default.
Is there a way to overwrite this?
Wouldn't it be more logical to put `compress` on `true` by default?
Server.js contents:
```javascript
process.env.NODE_ENV = 'production'
process.chdir(__dirname)
const NextServer = require('next/dist/server/next-server').default
const http = require('http')
const path = require('path')
let handler
const server = http.createServer(async (req, res) => {
try {
await handler(req, res)
} catch (err) {
console.error(err)
res.statusCode = 500
res.end('internal server error')
}
})
const currentPort = parseInt(process.env.PORT, 10) || 3000
server.listen(currentPort, err => {
if (err) {
console.error('Failed to start server', err)
process.exit(1)
}
const addr = server.address()
const nextServer = new NextServer({
hostname: 'localhost',
port: currentPort,
dir: path.join(__dirname),
dev: false,
conf: {
env: {},
webpack: null,
webpackDevMiddleware: null,
eslint: {ignoreDuringBuilds: false},
typescript: {ignoreBuildErrors: false, tsconfigPath: 'tsconfig.json'},
distDir: './.next',
cleanDistDir: true,
assetPrefix: '',
configOrigin: 'next.config.js',
useFileSystemPublicRoutes: true,
generateEtags: true,
pageExtensions: ['tsx', 'ts', 'jsx', 'js'],
target: 'server',
poweredByHeader: true,
compress: true,
analyticsId: '',
images: {
deviceSizes: [640, 750, 828, 1080, 1200, 1920, 2048, 3840],
imageSizes: [16, 32, 48, 64, 96, 128, 256, 384],
path: '/_next/image',
loader: 'default',
domains: [
'assets-eu-01.kc-usercontent.com',
'preview-assets-eu-01.kc-usercontent.com',
],
disableStaticImages: false,
minimumCacheTTL: 60,
formats: ['image/webp'],
},
devIndicators: {
buildActivity: true,
buildActivityPosition: 'bottom-right',
},
onDemandEntries: {maxInactiveAge: 15000, pagesBufferLength: 2},
amp: {canonicalBase: ''},
basePath: '',
sassOptions: {},
trailingSlash: false,
i18n: {defaultLocale: 'en', locales: ['en', 'nl']},
productionBrowserSourceMaps: false,
optimizeFonts: true,
excludeDefaultMomentLocales: true,
serverRuntimeConfig: {},
publicRuntimeConfig: {},
reactStrictMode: false,
httpAgentOptions: {keepAlive: true},
outputFileTracing: true,
staticPageGenerationTimeout: 60,
swcMinify: false,
experimental: {
cpus: 11,
sharedPool: true,
plugins: false,
profiling: false,
isrFlushToDisk: true,
workerThreads: false,
pageEnv: false,
optimizeImages: false,
optimizeCss: false,
scrollRestoration: false,
externalDir: false,
reactRoot: false,
disableOptimizedLoading: false,
gzipSize: true,
swcFileReading: true,
craCompat: false,
esmExternals: true,
isrMemoryCacheSize: 52428800,
concurrentFeatures: false,
serverComponents: false,
fullySpecified: false,
outputFileTracingRoot: '',
outputStandalone: true,
},
configFileName: 'next.config.js',
},
})
handler = nextServer.getRequestHandler()
console.log('Listening on port', currentPort)
})
```
### Expected Behavior
I would like an option to overwrite the `compress` configuration, or to have `compress` on `true` by default
### To Reproduce
Put this in `next.config.js`:
```javascript
experimental: {
outputStandalone: true,
},
```
Execute `npm run build`, and check the `server.js` file in `.next/standalone` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33696 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33717 | c551a329d53ecb1f4543b71cae9672fb8f40ccc1 | 0d642f1264b5dd20fe4bacb9470e95877bcaf273 | "2022-01-26T14:45:35Z" | javascript | "2022-01-27T02:13:10Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,667 | ["packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/plugins/functions-manifest-plugin.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/plugins/middleware-plugin.ts", "packages/next/shared/lib/constants.ts", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js"] | Generate functions-manifest.json | For #31317 and other issues, we can no longer using middleware to host the SSR handler. Instead these routes should be generated as standalone functions, and we should emit a `functions-manifest.json` file to indicate the target function runtime and other information. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33667 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33770 | 030666b5bf46783ab7d79d53ec2f0a7fc365ed02 | 5b31c18e76754837fb6732bc1fc56fef9d3b7ad2 | "2022-01-25T22:40:21Z" | javascript | "2022-01-31T15:46:04Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,615 | ["packages/next/build/index.ts", "packages/next/lib/worker.ts"] | Custom build with App getInitialProps hangs | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: darwin
Arch: x64
Version: Darwin Kernel Version 20.6.0: Mon Aug 30 06:12:21 PDT 2021; root:xnu-7195.141.6~3/RELEASE_X86_64
Binaries:
Node: 14.18.3
npm: 6.14.15
Yarn: 1.22.10
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.3
### What browser are you using?
N/A
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next build
### Describe the Bug
We have found a bug when using Next 12 with [Gasket](https://gasket.dev). When the custom `_app` uses `getInitialProps`, the process hangs and never finishes.
This is reproducable with a very simple custom build script, such as in [this repo](https://github.com/kinetifex/next-12-custom-build-bug).
When calling the Next `build` function from a script, the process hangs and never exits.
### Expected Behavior
Running a build by executing the `next/dist/build` function from a script completes and exits successfully.
### To Reproduce
Clone [this repo](https://github.com/kinetifex/next-12-custom-build-bug), and run the custom build script.
```
git clone [email protected]:kinetifex/next-12-custom-build-bug.git
cd next-12-custom-build-bug
yarn
yarn custom-build
``` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33615 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/34503 | 7c103fac7d96f7ebadf03620044f3b2c02c4df48 | ab40370ea5b69aa4dd601907eb85d25da1140b6b | "2022-01-24T20:52:06Z" | javascript | "2022-02-18T09:12:56Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,600 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/src/bundle/mod.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/wasm/Cargo.toml"] | next.js seems to be handling JS closures incorrectly | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
```
/bin/sh: pnpm: command not found
Operating System:
Platform: darwin
Arch: arm64
Version: Darwin Kernel Version 21.0.1: Tue Sep 14 20:56:24 PDT 2021; root:xnu-8019.30.61~4/RELEASE_ARM64_T6000
Binaries:
Node: 17.1.0
npm: 8.1.2
Yarn: 1.22.17
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.9-canary.6
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
v17.1.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
MacOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next run dev
### Describe the Bug
The following code executes differently in my browser than in next.js:
```
const myFunction = () => {
for (let j = 0; j <= 3; j++) {
for (const _ of []) {
}
if (j === 1) {
console.log("before set timeout, j is:", j)
setTimeout(() => {
console.log("in timeout: j is", j)
}, 50)
}
}
return null
}
myFunction()
```
In my browser, this code correctly prints:
```
before set timeout, j is: 1
in timeout: j is 1
```
When I paste this into the top level of index.tsx, run `yarn run dev` and navigate my browser to localhost:3000, I see:
```
before set timeout, j is: 1
in timeout: j is 4
```
### Expected Behavior
I expected the output to be the same whether in browser console or in next.js.
### To Reproduce
1. Create a new next app with `npx create-next-app my-app`
2. Paste the code into pages/index.js
3. `yarn run dev` and look at the console | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33600 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33628 | eba64c29a4acd4bd1dfc469c3aec3fd37c6bc372 | 9dd0399dd832dbb6ead80f80e12135b27cfdfd97 | "2022-01-24T08:37:55Z" | javascript | "2022-01-25T09:22:22Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,598 | ["docs/advanced-features/security-headers.md"] | Improve Content-Security-Policy usage explanation | ### What is the improvement or update you wish to see?
Can you add content security policy header examples?
### Is there any context that might help us understand?
At the moment the docs have
```
{
key: 'Content-Security-Policy',
value: // Your CSP Policy
}
```
Could you give examples of what `// Your CSP Policy` could be?
Is it a string, an object, an array?
In the Mozilla docs they have:
`<meta http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy" content="default-src 'self'; img-src https://*; child-src 'none';">`
but I'm not sure how to add that to `value: // Your CSP Policy`
For my use case I need to specify acceptable origins of our iframes.
### Does the docs page already exist? Please link to it.
https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/security-headers | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33598 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33833 | 4f5975ffc49967f49acb7ea595b75723aa1356df | ad79c04d6bfe91cb25f2a85e7b170e75ac769ed4 | "2022-01-24T07:02:08Z" | javascript | "2022-01-31T20:30:47Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,578 | ["packages/next/shared/lib/router/router.ts", "test/integration/i18n-support/pages/index.js", "test/integration/i18n-support/test/index.test.js", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/api/ok.js", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/redirects/_middleware.js", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/redirects/index.js", "test/integration/middleware/core/test/index.test.js", "test/lib/browsers/playwright.ts"] | Middleware doesn't redirect properly with i18n | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: darwin
Arch: x64
Version: Darwin Kernel Version 18.7.0: Tue Aug 20 16:57:14 PDT 2019; root:xnu-4903.271.2~2/RELEASE_X86_64
Binaries:
Node: 12.22.9
npm: 6.14.15
Yarn: 1.22.17
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
12.22.9
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
Middleware adds unnecessary locale to the path when redirecting to API thus the path becomes `[locale]/api/...` instead of `/api/...`.
### Expected Behavior
Redirect to `/api/...` without locale in the path.
### To Reproduce
Repository: [next.js-bug-middleware-locale-redirect](https://github.com/rokinsky/next.js-bug-middleware-locale-redirect)
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to [http://localhost:3000/nl-nl/posts/a](http://localhost:3000/nl-nl/posts/a)
2. Click on the "to B" link
3. Click on the "to C" link
4. See 404 error and the `/nl-nl/api/hello?callback=/nl-nl/posts/c` path.
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33578 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/35994 | aaa823c3fa0b4d248b7c172c0e017b7645793a06 | 93678b569bb46df9fad39f9db2b18797872b7c15 | "2022-01-23T17:19:45Z" | javascript | "2022-04-11T15:59:07Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,553 | ["docs/advanced-features/custom-app.md"] | `appContext.router.pathname` using old value after using `router.push` for customized app | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
```
PS D:\UserData\Downloads\router-push> next info
'pnpm' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
Operating System:
Platform: win32
Arch: x64
Version: Windows 10 Pro
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.2
npm: 8.3.0
Yarn: 1.22.15
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.2
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
Irrelevant
### Describe the Bug
Router path name from `getInitialProps` of the customized app is using the old pathname instead of the new one. The line below will show the unexpected behavior in the browser dev console.
https://github.com/RaenonX/bug-router-push-custom-app/blob/2df1c10a3f9d6543a1f781bf7fb1524444b468d0/pages/_app.tsx#L10
### Expected Behavior
> Needs to run `next dev` to start the website first.
After clicking on the button `push A` or `push B`, the corresponding pathname should be shown as `/A` for `push A`; `/B` for `push B` in the browser console.
### To Reproduce
https://github.com/RaenonX/bug-router-push-custom-app
Simply checkout the repository above, run `next dev` and observe the behavior. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33553 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/35303 | 99aea513bfb9721a83feef2812f33819c3ede9ae | 7891645d4b64bb4ee775d0a5a38fc58abc1dfa90 | "2022-01-22T03:48:57Z" | javascript | "2022-03-15T14:34:49Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,544 | ["packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-flight-client-loader.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-flight-server-loader.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/plugins/flight-manifest-plugin.ts", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/components/client.client.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/components/shared.client.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/components/shared.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/pages/shared.server.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/rsc.js", "yarn.lock"] | RSC: loader improvement & shared components | ### Background
We have 2 webpack loders to handle the transform of server and client components on both server and client side, to make sure:
* server components won't get executed on client side
* client components can be SSR’d
### Problem
#### Exports
Those loaders assume you define components with `export default` by default. Which has limited users' ability to export components more flexibly.
#### Shared components
And we don't know how the shared components are defined: if a component from a file with js extension is imported and can work well in both server/client components, we call them shared components. Loaders should be able to handle those cases to let shared components behave differently on the 2 sides.
Since the import paths could be aliased, the import identifiers could be renamed or assigned dynamically, it's hard to capture it as a shared one or not. This could be tricky. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33544 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/34692 | 175e081e862b503d2daf4c2d07d589f86d037f06 | 8ba2aec022f88b8d773013c8188fe284779bba8c | "2022-01-21T16:06:05Z" | javascript | "2022-02-28T15:00:28Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,536 | ["errors/invalid-api-status-body.md"] | API Routes 204 > Conflict between TypeScript and linter rules | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: darwin
Arch: arm64
Version: Darwin Kernel Version 21.1.0: Wed Oct 13 17:33:24 PDT 2021; root:xnu-8019.41.5~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T8101
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.2
npm: 7.24.2
Yarn: N/A
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.2
### What browser are you using?
Edge
### What operating system are you using?
macOS 12.0.1
### How are you deploying your application?
localhost
### Describe the Bug
In a route API, if I want to return a 204 HTTP Code (No Content), I first added an empty object `{}` as body response, but I get an error inside my terminal :
> A body was attempted to be set with a 204 statusCode for /api/hello, this is invalid and the body was ignored.
> See more info here https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/invalid-api-status-body
So in the docs, we have this code example to use:
```js
export default function handler(req, res) {
res.status(204).send()
}
```
But by using it, it's now a TypeScript which appears in VSC
```
Expected 1 arguments, but got 0.ts(2554)
utils.d.ts(217, 25): An argument for 'body' was not provided.
```
```ts
// utils.d.ts:217
/**
* Send body of response
*/
declare type Send<T> = (body: T) => void;
```
I try to change the `res` type with `res: NextApiResponse<any>` but it's not change.
And if I use `res: NextApiResponse<void>`, the error disappear for the `204` return, but now is on a `200` or `400` for example.
The only solution looks like to force the cast as :
```ts
;(res as NextApiResponse<void>).status(204).send()
```
Is there any solution for casting `body` type depending of the status code?
Thanks
### Expected Behavior
Allow to use an empty/void parameter in the `send()` method for a 204 API response.
### To Reproduce
```ts
// /pages/api/hello.ts
import type { NextApiRequest, NextApiResponse } from 'next'
export default function handler(req: NextApiRequest, res: NextApiResponse) {
res.status(204).send()
}
``` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33536 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33611 | bc223d76e0e1962ba5904b52597c4b3a47184f11 | b7725133f867b5e530dd4bb5d1fd8d5d389e3364 | "2022-01-21T14:21:02Z" | javascript | "2022-02-03T02:41:28Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,476 | ["packages/next/shared/lib/loadable.js", "test/production/next/jest/index.test.ts"] | Regression in 12.0.8 for jest: TypeError: require.resolveWeak is not a function | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: win32
Arch: x64
Version: Windows 10 Enterprise
Binaries:
Node: 16.8.0
npm: 7.21.0
Yarn: 1.22.10
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.8.0
### What browser are you using?
Edge (Chromium)
### What operating system are you using?
Windows 11 Enterprise (by the way, why does next info say I am using Windows 10??)
### How are you deploying your application?
On Azure App Service as docker container
### Describe the Bug
We have a Next.js website where the unit tests are using Jest. When I try to upgrade the website from Next.js 12.0.7 to 12.0.8 the unit tests which test code that uses dynamic code loading start failing.
It looks to me this is related to this previously closed bug, which would make this a regression for Next.js 12.0.8: [TypeError: require.resolveWeak is not a function (jest test) #19862](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/19862)
Example output
```
● Test suite failed to run
TypeError: require.resolveWeak is not a function
> 29 | const HeaderSearchBoxMobile = dynamic(() => import('../HeaderSearchBox/HeaderSearchBoxMobile/HeaderSearchBoxMobile'));
```
### Expected Behavior
Tests should pass even if the code they test uses dynamic()
### To Reproduce
Run a Jest test where the test code tests some code that uses dynamic() to load some other code. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33476 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33908 | 694407450638b037673c6d714bfe4126aeded740 | 40329a70a5b4680e71c5ee1d9a7e59b10d80f113 | "2022-01-19T22:13:35Z" | javascript | "2022-02-08T14:02:53Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,463 | ["packages/next/client/image.tsx", "test/integration/image-component/default/pages/on-loading-complete.js", "test/integration/image-component/default/test/index.test.js"] | onLoadingComplete is being called several times when parent rerenders | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
_No response_
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.16.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
If a parent rerenders, onLoadingComplete will be called several times, if onLoadingComplete sets a state this might cause an infinite loop.
### Expected Behavior
onLoadingComplete should be called only once
### To Reproduce
Add an element to an array onLoadingComplete to trigger a re-render
cc @styfle | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33463 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33474 | 96057c8f67db41cdb8a1ed831e459d6b1e4e4c01 | c879fce0d465cd96d0d05e329c0a8a83f46e29d9 | "2022-01-19T14:57:58Z" | javascript | "2022-01-20T15:29:34Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,462 | ["package.json", "packages/next/compiled/node-fetch/index.js", "yarn.lock"] | Upgrade `node-fetch` | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: win32
Arch: x64
Version: Windows 10 Pro
Binaries:
Node: 14.18.2
npm: 6.14.15
Yarn: 1.22.17
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.2
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows 10
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
Vulnerability in Next.js 12.0.8, in node-fetch package
### Expected Behavior
λ snyk test next
Testing next...
✗ Medium severity vulnerability found in node-fetch
Description: Information Exposure
Info: https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODEFETCH-2342118
Introduced through: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Organization: xxx
Package manager: npm
Open source: yes
Project path: next
Tested next for known vulnerabilities, found 1 vulnerability, 1 vulnerable path.
### To Reproduce
install nextjs project
install snyk global
run snyk test | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33462 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33466 | 818f6b32583c260dfd4a4cd8dbd4841bd5d4639c | 1d4f364515d34586b864923dafb7888bf1ff79d2 | "2022-01-19T14:25:54Z" | javascript | "2022-01-19T16:48:11Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,458 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock"] | swcMinify: true, spread props triggers child component re-mount | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Arch: x64
Version: #1237-Microsoft Sat Sep 11 14:32:00 PST 2021
Binaries:
Node: 16.10.0
npm: 7.24.0
Yarn: 1.22.5
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.9-canary.2
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8 and ^12.0.9-canary.2
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.10.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
Using spread props on intermediate component causes its child components to be re-mounted on each re-render.
To reproduce,
1. Run `yarn build`
2. Run `yarn start`
3. Go to `http://localhost:3000/spread`, change the input, you'll find that every input change will cause a full remount on the input element.
**Only happen when**
1. swcMinify: true
2. Using spread operator `{...props}`
### Expected Behavior
Should not cause re-mount when using spread props on parent component.
### To Reproduce
https://github.com/frendyguo/swcminify-spread-operator-bug | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33458 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33485 | 2fd17ba1f8712b472914a00326f68104b3968633 | a54eb376e1afc261c898cb4872cd053fc0fb98d3 | "2022-01-19T12:30:50Z" | javascript | "2022-01-20T08:54:56Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,450 | ["docs/middleware.md"] | Middleware fails in v12.0.8 | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
```sh
Operating System:
Platform: darwin
Arch: x64
Version: Darwin Kernel Version 21.2.0: Sun Nov 28 20:28:54 PST 2021; root:xnu-8019.61.5~1/RELEASE_X86_64
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.0
npm: 8.1.0
Yarn: 3.1.0
pnpm: 6.11.0
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
After upgrading to v12.0.8 yesterday, middleware throws the following error:
```sh
error - Error: To use middleware you must provide a `hostname` and `port` to the Next.js Server
```
The setup is pretty straightforward:
* I have `basePath` and `assetPrefix` set
* `pages/users/_middleware.ts` is the location
### Expected Behavior
Should be working as same as in v12.0.7
### To Reproduce
* Create a project
* Add `_middleware.ts` file under `pages/users` for example
* Navigate to `/users`
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33450 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33535 | ebe95f442089d33a7660cb02a6427ce64a9d223f | f4c1594a6bd975016e5b8abf03f541afcf4723ad | "2022-01-19T08:12:23Z" | javascript | "2022-01-21T21:37:15Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,441 | ["packages/next/server/image-optimizer.ts", "test/integration/image-optimizer/test/index.test.js"] | On nonexistent image request, next/image hangs and eventually returns a 504 | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
```
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Arch: x64
Version: #51~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 7 06:51:40 UTC 2022
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.0
npm: 6.14.15
Yarn: 1.22.15
pnpm: 6.11.0
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.9-canary.0
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.9-canary.0
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Linux
### How are you deploying your application?
Local application
### Describe the Bug
On nonexistent image request, next/image hangs and eventually returns a `504`.
This happens in a local next app and also in our production app.
### Expected Behavior
next/image should return a `404`
### To Reproduce
Please have a look at this repo where you can find the steps to reproduce: https://github.com/inside/next-image-app | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33441 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33719 | 311f66ead6658d8b12021dcab5f55b97c956fcde | c551a329d53ecb1f4543b71cae9672fb8f40ccc1 | "2022-01-18T16:33:56Z" | javascript | "2022-01-27T01:41:57Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,402 | ["docs/api-reference/next/script.md", "docs/basic-features/script.md"] | Docs: conflict in next/script's onLoad documentation | ### What is the improvement or update you wish to see?
I'm afraid there's currently a conflict between the two documentation pages on next/script. The [Script Component page says](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/script#executing-code-after-loading-onload) following:
> If you are loading a script with either `beforeInteractive` or `afterInteractive` as a loading strategy, you can execute code after it has loaded using the `onLoad` property
However, in the [API reference page on `next/script`](https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/script#onload), under `onLoad`, it says:
> Note: `onLoad` can't be used with the `beforeInteractive` loading strategy.
As far as I know, the `onLoad` prop for `beforeInteractive` is not currently working and there's [an open issue](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33191) on that. Either way, the documentation should be in line with the current state of affairs.
### Is there any context that might help us understand?
I can see the reason why a separate API documentation page for next/script exists in addition to the guide page on script optimization, but I would hope that any time either of those two are updated, the other would be checked for inconsistencies.
The inconsistency was created in #33097.
### Does the docs page already exist? Please link to it.
_No response_ | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33402 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/36453 | adcd9143fefe37dd367993a2132550e299a92683 | ff140a729162cd2bd14f17b4ecbf269f03966f59 | "2022-01-17T16:37:15Z" | javascript | "2022-04-25T17:51:35Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,314 | ["packages/next/lib/is-error.ts", "packages/next/lib/is-serializable-props.ts", "packages/next/shared/lib/is-plain-object.ts"] | Client bundles contain non es5 code | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Arch: x64
Version: #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed, 05 Jan 2022 16:20:59 +0000
Binaries:
Node: 16.7.0
npm: 7.20.3
Yarn: N/A
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.7.0
### What browser are you using?
Chromium, Firefox
### What operating system are you using?
Linux
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
The update to 12.0.8 introduced a regression w.r.t. es5 compatibility. If running the command series given below the following error occurs:
```
ES-Check Error:
----
· erroring file: ./.next/static/chunks/main-1e7421553b9673ee.js
· error: SyntaxError: The keyword 'const' is reserved (1:97874)
· see the printed err.stack below for context
----
SyntaxError: The keyword 'const' is reserved (1:97874)
```
I think this is related to the changes in #33159 which added a new method `getProperError` to the `ìs-error.js` file. This method is used on the client side in `next/client/index.tsx`. The previously used `isError` function was very simple and es5 compatible. The new method uses the `isPlainObject` method which contains a `const` declaration.
I think the root cause is that `dist/lib` isn't transpiled during building. Looking at the [Babel loader regex](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts#L472-L477) only `dist/shared/lib` seems to be transpiled. So moving those files there might be a solution for this problem.
### Expected Behavior
The Webpack bundle files contain only es5 compatible JavaScript code.
### To Reproduce
- npx create-next-app@latest --typescript
- npx next build
- npx es-check es5 './.next/static/**/*.js' | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33314 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33690 | 33784f1342487007619ddb02ccef3167d5cd8df7 | 662fa6362a07caa9185e999983d42715281a61aa | "2022-01-14T14:01:59Z" | javascript | "2022-01-27T17:59:42Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,294 | ["packages/next/compiled/@vercel/nft/index.js", "packages/next/package.json", "yarn.lock"] | esbuild not working in prod serverless functions | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: darwin
Arch: x64
Version: Darwin Kernel Version 21.2.0: Sun Nov 28 20:28:54 PST 2021; root:xnu-8019.61.5~1/RELEASE_X86_64
Binaries:
Node: 15.10.0
npm: 7.5.3
Yarn: 1.22.11
pnpm: 5.4.0
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
15.10.0
### What browser are you using?
Edge
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
importing esbuild in serverless functions doesn't work in production (but does locally)
### Expected Behavior
You should be able to import and use esbuild in API functions without any special configuration
### To Reproduce
Reproduction repo. https://github.com/brynshanahan/esbuild-repro
https://esbuild-repro.vercel.app/
Esbuild is being used to compile the code at the top of this page in getStaticProps successfully and the button calls the API endpoint (that runs the exact same code as the getStaticProps function) | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33294 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33548 | f5fb18198c37727b4abe6e85b74fc33ea191381d | f81a6a5f0fc3a33a51112d4d3261d431e704b0da | "2022-01-14T05:28:39Z" | javascript | "2022-01-22T00:14:11Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,291 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock"] | Using spread props in a `next/head` child causes void elements to be decorated with a `children` prop | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: win32
Arch: x64
Version: Windows 10 Pro
Binaries:
Node: 14.18.1
npm: 8.1.3
Yarn: N/A
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.1
### What browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge Version 97.0.1072.55
### What operating system are you using?
Windows 11
### How are you deploying your application?
N/A
### Describe the Bug
When using spread props (`{ ...props }`) on a child of `next/head`, the element is decorated with a `children` prop set to `[ undefined, false, undefined, undefined ]`. When this occurs on a void element, this causes an unrecoverable build error.
```
Server Error
Error: link is a void element tag and must neither have `children` nor use `dangerouslySetInnerHTML`.
```
This is what ReactDOM is passed, and tries to validate:
```
{
tag: 'link',
props: {
href: '/favicon.svg',
sizes: '192x192',
rel: 'icon',
children: [ undefined, false, undefined, undefined ]
}
}
```
[In the reproduction](https://github.com/dstaley/next-head-rest/blob/main/pages/index.js#L21), you can see that no `children` prop is being passed to the element.
### Expected Behavior
Page builds correctly and renders in the browser.
### To Reproduce
[Reproduction Repo](https://github.com/dstaley/next-head-rest)
After cloning the repo and installing dependencies, run `npm run dev` and visit `http://localhost:3000` in a browser. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33291 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33342 | 790db2c2e4786ecc3127ea32263230f342d1dcf7 | aaa77dd73f188494ca5db56cd6932bc66ed3cf35 | "2022-01-13T23:53:22Z" | javascript | "2022-01-17T14:09:55Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,265 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/wasm/Cargo.toml"] | Video.js crash when SWC Minify is enabled | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
_No response_
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
any
### What browser are you using?
Chrome 97.0.4692.71
### What operating system are you using?
Windows11 & MacOS 12.1
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
Run `next build && next start`, open the demo in any browser.
Click the play button, video can not play, and console shows the error: `VIDEOJS: ERROR: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'playlistLoader')`
### Expected Behavior
Video plays with no errors.
### To Reproduce
Repo: https://github.com/cuyl/next-bug-with-swc-minify
Link: https://next-bug-with-swc-minify.vercel.app/
Open the link and click the play button, the error shows on the console. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33265 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33427 | 3220bbaba337089624e535f2bc71623e593e725f | b111ba159a8b4f76e6f40d9d95cffea746bb8a70 | "2022-01-13T14:45:55Z" | javascript | "2022-01-19T08:15:45Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,210 | ["docs/going-to-production.md"] | Docs: Add section about how cache-control headers are set, depending on how your pages fetch data | ### What is the improvement or update you wish to see?
See this comment: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33204#issuecomment-1010840976
### Is there any context that might help us understand?
^
### Does the docs page already exist? Please link to it.
Maybe here: https://nextjs.org/docs/going-to-production#caching and here: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next.config.js/headers#cache-control | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33210 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/35336 | 0a416acdcf2bc16d4a931301e4c192b74c6823ff | 86c1bf6d2b74fa9fa2288a73b529956dd4841bcd | "2022-01-12T10:06:39Z" | javascript | "2022-03-16T10:48:45Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,191 | ["docs/basic-features/script.md"] | next/script does not trigger onLoad callback when used with beforeInteractive strategy | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
_No response_
### What version of Next.js are you using?
11.1.2
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.15
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Linux
### How are you deploying your application?
next dev
### Describe the Bug
According to the [docs](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/script#executing-code-after-loading-onload), `onLoad` callback of `next/script` component can be used either with `beforeInteractive` and `afterInteractive` strategies. But when using with `beforeInteractive` strategy, `onLoad` callback never gets called.
### Expected Behavior
Expect `onLoad` callback to be called when loading script with `beforeInteractive` strategy
### To Reproduce
Using the same example of the docs, with stripe script: hasLoaded is never set to true and stripe has loaded never gets printed.
I get the same behavior in the latest version of next.
Here is a minimal reproducible repo: https://github.com/loft-br/before-interactive-on-load-bug

| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33191 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/36261 | 4a8a3d2400a54448b615fbc75cd91ca8cfea256c | 44c7fd79994d4515dd47e3c8ac94cb0e9f670027 | "2022-01-11T15:31:37Z" | javascript | "2022-04-19T11:50:19Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,135 | ["packages/next/compiled/nanoid/index.cjs", "packages/next/compiled/postcss-safe-parser/safe-parse.js", "packages/next/compiled/postcss-scss/scss-syntax.js", "packages/next/package.json", "yarn.lock"] | Outdated PostCSS | ### Describe the Bug
PostCSS is listed as a direct dependency with a pinned version.
This makes it impossible for users to use plugins that require a higher version.
Context : https://github.com/csstools/postcss-plugins/issues/147
### Expected
PostCSS should be peer dependency with relaxed constraints
_having a slightly more flexible issue template would also be nice :D_ | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33135 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33142 | 0c5f4e7844e08ae6be7ec3e4f412ecc35c003976 | 1dd053f9fabaaec460570dca79fe326b3de8dee6 | "2022-01-10T11:07:37Z" | javascript | "2022-01-13T16:06:38Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,110 | ["docs/advanced-features/src-directory.md", "docs/basic-features/environment-variables.md"] | Docs: No info on environment variables in the /src folder | ### What is the improvement or update you wish to see?
Change this line in [this page](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/src-directory):
> Config files like next.config.js and tsconfig.json should be inside the root directory, moving them to src won't work. Same goes for the public directory
To:
> Config files like next.config.js and tsconfig.json, as well as environment variables, should be inside the root directory, moving them to src won't work. Same goes for the public directory
And add a note [here](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/environment-variables#loading-environment-variables):
> Note: If you are using a /src folder, please note that Next.JS will load the .env files **only** from the parent folder and **not** from the /src folder.
### Is there any context that might help us understand?
I've had this tiny issue that I didn't think of, but maybe one line in the documentation might help other people as well, since it's a small thing that is [not](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/src-directory) [mentioned](https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next.config.js/environment-variables): if you, by any chance, have environment variables in your /src folder, they're not gonna be read by the program. If you have them in the parent folder however, they will be read. Maybe it's not the most important problem around, but it would be great if it would be mentioned in the documentation somewhere (if not on both the Environment Variables page as well as the /src folder one).
Kind regards
### Does the docs page already exist? Please link to it.
https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/environment-variables#loading-environment-variables
https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/src-directory | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33110 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33136 | 213f5a43eac7c95810ae6ccc49d8d36cedfe6115 | 8ae08b94d8737cf421c4c07327c594fa17f5c9f2 | "2022-01-09T12:42:45Z" | javascript | "2022-01-10T13:58:29Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,081 | ["packages/next/shared/lib/router/router.ts", "packages/next/shared/lib/router/utils/parse-relative-url.ts", "packages/next/shared/lib/utils.ts", "test/integration/client-navigation/pages/nav/relative-1.js", "test/integration/client-navigation/pages/nav/relative-2.js", "test/integration/client-navigation/pages/nav/relative/index.js", "test/integration/client-navigation/test/index.test.js", "test/unit/parse-relative-url.test.ts"] | next/link treats initial dot incorrectly | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: Windows
Arch: x64
Version: Windows 10 Enterprise
Binaries:
Node: 16.0.0
npm: 7.10.0
Yarn: N/A
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.7
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.0.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows 10
### How are you deploying your application?
Only local project for now
### Describe the Bug
At a page like https://www.example.com/suburl/
Using standard html syntax to link to a sub path `<Link href="./path/"><a href="./path/">a</a></Link>` next/link sends the user to the wrong url: example.com/path/ - it skips the dot which should be the current path.
Seems like it should be supported based on: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/614
### Expected Behavior
The link should lead to: https://www.example.com/suburl/path/ .
If you disable js in the browser you get the correct native bahavior of course.
### To Reproduce
At a page like https://www.example.com/suburl/
next.config.mjs:
/**
* @type {import('next').NextConfig}
*/
const nextConfig = {
trailingSlash: true,
}
export default nextConfig
In a component:
<Link href="./path/">
<a>link</a>
</Link> | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33081 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/36823 | 99b017e5cbcc7cc9bd220332f6f4847540a44629 | 87826ee186fc65c0b3b4288791f4b575158371c9 | "2022-01-07T09:24:25Z" | javascript | "2022-05-22T16:43:48Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,076 | ["docs/advanced-features/using-mdx.md"] | typo in documentation for MDX custom components leads to syntax error: unexpected token | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
```
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Arch: x64
Version: #101-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 15 20:00:55 UTC 2021
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.1
npm: 8.1.2
Yarn: 1.22.10
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8-canary.19
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7 or canary
### What version of Node.js are you using?
v16.13.1
### What browser are you using?
Firefox
### What operating system are you using?
Linux
### How are you deploying your application?
testing
### Describe the Bug
The [documentation for custom components in MDX](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/using-mdx#layouts) contains this example:
```js
export default = ({ children }) => <MyLayoutComponent meta={meta}>{children}</MyLayoutComponent>
```
The `=` sign here may be a typo. It leads to a syntax error: unexpected token.
### Expected Behavior
It should not lead to a syntax error.
### To Reproduce
See [this code sandbox](https://codesandbox.io/s/modern-river-kbms2?file=/pages/about.mdx). | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33076 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33077 | aeb67cc28d1d589719b95043042c6cb8f9aab26c | e5e04c9039fd81f31309514a0502fc0e1af272eb | "2022-01-06T21:30:20Z" | javascript | "2022-01-06T23:32:31Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,043 | ["packages/next/build/polyfills/process.js", "packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/plugins/middleware-plugin.ts", "test/production/dependencies-can-use-env-vars-in-middlewares/index.test.ts"] | Packages used in middleware can't read env vars >=12.05 | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
_No response_
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.5
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.3.0
### What browser are you using?
chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
yarn dev
### Describe the Bug
Packages used in middleware return undefined for `process.env.*`
### Expected Behavior
packages used in middleware should be able to read env vars
### To Reproduce
https://github.com/braden-clerk/middleware-bug
This repo replicates the bug | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33043 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33141 | f0ad19aef62c058893ed12956d40b22b5a8794d4 | 4aa9879dcc947fabcaaae14387198b8aa5c45296 | "2022-01-05T20:10:06Z" | javascript | "2022-01-10T18:45:00Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,005 | ["packages/next/build/swc/options.js", "test/unit/jest-next-swc.test.ts"] | `next/jest` sets `NODE_ENV` to `'production'` | ### Run `next info` (available from version 12.0.8 and up)
Operating System:
Platform: darwin
Arch: arm64
Version: Darwin Kernel Version 21.1.0: Wed Oct 13 17:33:24 PDT 2021; root:xnu-8019.41.5~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T8101
Binaries:
Node: 14.17.6
npm: 8.1.4
Yarn: 1.22.15
pnpm: N/A
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8-canary.17
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8-canary.17
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.17.6
### What browser are you using?
N/A
### What operating system are you using?
macOS 12.0.1 (21A559)
### How are you deploying your application?
N/A
### Describe the Bug
The `next/jest` preset sets `NODE_ENV` to `'production'`.
Users familiar with Jest will expect `NODE_ENV` to be `'test'` when running tests. The documentation says:
> Set to `'test'` if it's not already set to something else.
In this case, `NODE_ENV` is indeed set to `'test'` initially, but is replaced with `'production'`. I've verified this simply by console logging the environment in the test setup files, and again in a test. I did take a _quick_ look, but wasn't able to identify the cause.
This is related to #17032 and #17903.
### Expected Behavior
When running tests in Jest, `NODE_ENV` should be `'test'`.
### To Reproduce
Create a new app using the Jest example:
```sh
npx create-next-app --example with-jest with-jest-app
```
Add the following line to the example test:
```ts
// __tests__/index.test.tsx
console.log(process.env.NODE_ENV); // production
```
Run:
```sh
npm test
``` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33005 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33032 | ce3a3d8eea92c1968dbfdb09176e3d82ccbf039a | 1ee13baf000ab391e6017c68eb4770768a8e7674 | "2022-01-04T23:55:46Z" | javascript | "2022-01-05T15:22:22Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,913 | [".eslintignore", "packages/next/build/swc/options.js", "test/production/emit-decorator-metadata/app/jsconfig.json", "test/production/emit-decorator-metadata/app/pages/api/[[...params]].js", "test/production/emit-decorator-metadata/app/pages/index.js", "test/production/emit-decorator-metadata/index.test.ts"] | Missing `"decoratorMetadata": true` in swc config causes metadata based libraries to fail. | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.7.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
The flag `"decoratorMetadata": true` is not enabled thus SWC does not emit Typescript decorator metadata which causes libraries like [next-api-decorators](https://next-api-decorators.vercel.app/) and `class-validator` to fail trying to look for metadata like `Reflect.getMetadata("design:type")`.
### Expected Behavior
SWC config should be configured to support decorator metadata.
At the very least this support should be enabled automatically when tsconfig includes the flag `"emitDecoratorMetadata": true`
### To Reproduce
1. Clone: https://github.com/sannajammeh/decorator-metadata-fail
2. Start the dev server
3. Navigate to /api/something in the browser
4. Watch it fail due to an internal issue in the handler which directly comes from a Reflect.getMetadata call at [this line](https://github.com/storyofams/next-api-decorators/blob/ed21529abc8194f6dabfee1d3fcf187f1dc55993/lib/internals/handler.ts#L70)
5. Remove the _ from `.babelrc_`.
6. Restart the dev server
7. Repeat step 3 and watch it work | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32913 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32914 | 8039c6b2b564a82ee67d4abdaae0771cee5e69b7 | e0c7794208dbac6d84ad6723741f896527630f34 | "2021-12-31T00:19:01Z" | javascript | "2022-02-06T16:48:09Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,848 | ["packages/next/server.js"] | Unable to test middleware with Jest | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.1
### What browser are you using?
Firefox
### What operating system are you using?
Pop!_OS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
When trying to test `_middleware.js` with Jest, I'm unable to `import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'` without throwing an error `SyntaxError: Unexpected token 'export'` because `next/server` uses `export { NextRequest }` in line 1.
### Expected Behavior
I would like to be able to test my `_middleware.js` authentication methodology.
### To Reproduce
1. Create a Next app with the aforementioned versions.
2. Create a `_middleware.js`
3. Create a test for it in Jest.
4. Try to import `NextResponse` from `next/server`.
5. Run tests.
6. Get error. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32848 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/35181 | 9bff48b9d5998455c9c038d7f5834a58bb9f429f | 84720697e4f00bd77689153f7cf39421be9b1d25 | "2021-12-27T15:35:46Z" | javascript | "2022-03-09T22:50:07Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,774 | ["packages/next/client/use-intersection.tsx", "test/integration/image-component/default/pages/lazy-noref.js", "test/integration/image-component/default/pages/lazy-withref.js", "test/integration/image-component/default/test/index.test.js"] | Next Image does not work properly when used in a horizontally scrolling container | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome (Desktop and Android)
### What operating system are you using?
macOS Monterey and Android 12
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel (broken when developing locally with yarn dev as well)
### Describe the Bug
There are two issues present:
I am using Next Image inside of a horizontally scrolling container and the `lazyBoundary` prop isn't working + on Android Chrome images will permanently disappear once scrolled away from.
Firstly, here is a video screenshot of the network tab in Chrome on desktop. Notice that images do not load until the image is literally in the viewport despite `lazyBoundary` being set to an arbitrarily high value (in this case 9000px). From what I understand from the docs, the syntax is similar to that of the CSS `margin` property. This means that I should be able to specify both a vertical and horizontal value via shorthand (ex: `500px 1000px`), correct?
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10248395/147284509-c4006eba-7203-4bbb-8f67-fcbcad131a8f.mov
Secondly (and way more critically) on Chrome for Android I experience the same `lazyBoundary` issue but also experience images completely disappearing after scrolling away from them and back to them.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10248395/147284857-322ab2e0-e101-427b-9aca-235852a2b890.mov
This issue is present when deploying to Vercel as well as developing locally.
### Expected Behavior
The `lazyBoundary` property to be respected in a horizontal container and for images not to disappear on mobile
### To Reproduce
https://github.com/agusterodin/next-image-horizontal-scroll-bug-reproduction
Present when running the project via yarn dev AND when deployed to Vercel. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32774 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33933 | 1ac0fc43fafedcda98710c88ed19b6465ba13672 | d4b29db8c725331581185d3198d6a98ce291d203 | "2021-12-23T19:37:53Z" | javascript | "2022-02-07T15:46:16Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,772 | ["docs/api-reference/data-fetching/get-static-paths.md"] | Issue with `asPath` when using `getStaticProps` and redirects | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.17.6
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
Verel
### Describe the Bug
When using redirects in `next.config.js` and trying to output `router.asPath` in a dynamic route that is using `getStaticProps` and `getStaticPaths`, we are getting a `Warning: Text content did not match. Server: "/test-static/123" Client: "/test-statique/123"` message in the console. This is not an issue when using `getServerSideProps`.
### Expected Behavior
There should not be any discrepancy between the server and client markup. Basically, we should get the same result as with `getServerSideProps`.
### To Reproduce
## How to reproduce
Clone the example repo:
```bash
git clone https://github.com/nbouvrette/next-js-test-aspath
```
Run Next.js
```bash
npm run dev
# or
yarn dev
```
Open [http://localhost:3000](http://localhost:3000) with your browser to see the result.
Inspect your page, and make sure to open the `console` tab in your browser to see logs.
### Happy path
If you click on the first link.
Both SSR and client-side `asPath` matches when using `getServerSideProps` - no error is shown in the logs.
### Issue with `asPath`
If you return back, and click on the second link you should see the following error in your console:
```console
next-dev.js?3515:32 Warning: Text content did not match. Server: "/test-static/123" Client: "/test-statique/123"
at div
at TestStatic (webpack-internal:///./pages/test-static/[id].tsx:16:72)
at MyApp (webpack-internal:///./pages/_app.tsx:36:27)
at StyleRegistry (webpack-internal:///./node_modules/styled-jsx/dist/stylesheet-registry.js:231:34)
at ErrorBoundary (webpack-internal:///./node_modules/@next/react-dev-overlay/lib/internal/ErrorBoundary.js:26:47)
at ReactDevOverlay (webpack-internal:///./node_modules/@next/react-dev-overlay/lib/internal/ReactDevOverlay.js:90:23)
at Container (webpack-internal:///./node_modules/next/dist/client/index.js:356:9)
at AppContainer (webpack-internal:///./node_modules/next/dist/client/index.js:795:26)
at Root (webpack-internal:///./node_modules/next/dist/client/index.js:916:27)
See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/react-hydration-error
```
If you do a `view page source` you will see that the SSR markup is `/test-static/123` when in fact it should be using `/test-statique/123` as per the `redirects` configuration in `next.config.js`.
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32772 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33401 | 318664562c311322fc63ae993a12736dfaec5c5f | 84cba20ae77527dbfadf470d771f9934c9b7c56a | "2021-12-23T18:32:29Z" | javascript | "2022-05-22T22:52:41Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,727 | ["packages/next/shared/lib/router/router.ts", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/rewrites/_middleware.js", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/rewrites/about-bypass.js", "test/integration/middleware/core/test/index.test.js"] | Allow to opt-out from caching Middleware Preflight | ### Describe the feature you'd like to request
The client needs to know about all routes that are affected by Middleware in order to check with the server if there is a rewrite or a special response and therefore if it should pre-fetch or not. Currently, when we prefetch, we run what we called a "preflight" request to know about the effects of middleware so that it is not required to run the request synchronously when the user clicks a `Link` which potentially can add navigation latency.
While this is generally ok, it is possible that customers allow to customise cookies in the client which might affect a middleware invocation. For example, say that we have a session started with a cookie and a middleware that authenticates a request. Then we have a `Link` to an authenticated page in the viewport. In this case, when we first load we preflight the link to see that the user is indeed correctly authenticated. If we also allow the user to clear the cookie without refreshing and then we click the `Link`, Next.js will attempt to navigate to the link because the preflight response is cached.
### Describe the solution you'd like
We should allow an escape hatch to stop caching preflight requests so that we re-validate preflight on navigation. For this we can simply leverage the `Cache-Control` header with a `no-cache` directive, or use a different header specific for this purpose, that would force the client to revalidate the request on navigation.
In the events of using that directive, prefetch would still run once and it would only force revalidation on navigation. For the most part, this solution should work without creating any side issues with caching while the default behaviour would remain to be caching by default.
We should not confuse this feature with disabling pre-flight. In order to disable pre-flight we must always disable pre-fetch. Those two feature are completely tight as Middleware can invalidate prefetching with rewrites.
### Describe alternatives you've considered
As an alternative we can introduce an option directly in `NextResponse` that generates an internal header specifically to disable caching. Or we can also use a different header. Still I think it is cleaner and non-intrusive to use the `Cache-Control` directive as eventually we are simply playing with HTTP. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32727 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32767 | 4d307716f712e0d4376b203bbbeb5c2054d4fe30 | 82adaee0cd6d71d8b8307c92115bf032cb6330de | "2021-12-22T11:34:44Z" | javascript | "2022-01-03T18:13:28Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,713 | ["packages/create-next-app/create-app.ts"] | `yarn create next-app` fails when directory is a workspace | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.1
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next export
### Describe the Bug
With the following project structure:
```
.
├── node_modules
├── package.json
├── sites # this is a workspace
└── yarn.lock
```
And with the following `package.json`:
```json
{
"name": "workspace-test",
"version": "1.0.0",
"private": true,
"license": "MIT",
"workspaces": [
"sites/*"
]
}
```
Running this command fails:
```bash
yarn create next-app sites/hello-world
```
With this following output:
```
yarn create v1.22.17
[1/4] 🔍 Resolving packages...
[2/4] 🚚 Fetching packages...
[3/4] 🔗 Linking dependencies...
[4/4] 🔨 Building fresh packages...
success Installed "[email protected]" with binaries:
- create-next-app
[##] 2/2Creating a new Next.js app in /Users/karbi/dev/workspace-test/sites/hello-world.
Using yarn.
Installing dependencies:
- react
- react-dom
- next
yarn add v1.22.17
warning Missing version in workspace at "/Users/karbi/dev/workspace-test/sites/asd", ignoring.
warning Missing version in workspace at "/Users/karbi/dev/workspace-test/sites/hello-world", ignoring.
error An unexpected error occurred: "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'manifest')".
info If you think this is a bug, please open a bug report with the information provided in "/Users/karbi/dev/workspace-test/sites/hello-world/yarn-error.log".
info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/add for documentation about this command.
```
### Expected Behavior
I would expect that following command would produce a successful boilerplate without error:
```bash
yarn create next-app sites/hello-world
```
Additionally, running the following command works successfully when not targeting a workspace:
```bash
yarn create next-app hello-world
```
To note, using `npx` works successfully:
```bash
npx create-next-app sites/hello-world
```
### To Reproduce
Clone [this repository](https://github.com/karbica/workspace-test) and run the following command in the project root:
```bash
yarn create next-app sites/hello-world
```
<img width="1233" alt="Screen Shot 2021-12-21 at 1 20 09 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8563742/147000196-d2278207-0c00-4d78-8782-f5032493bc98.png">
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32713 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33006 | b39e49eca93ba9144f024189e18bada8e8dacd72 | 5b47639747fd583ccfd83b8f140491707dd14184 | "2021-12-21T21:22:52Z" | javascript | "2022-02-06T21:03:35Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,656 | ["docs/basic-features/eslint.md", "errors/manifest.json", "errors/no-styled-jsx-in-document.md", "packages/eslint-plugin-next/lib/index.js", "packages/eslint-plugin-next/lib/rules/no-styled-jsx-in-document.js", "test/unit/eslint-plugin-next/no-styled-jsx-in-document.test.ts"] | ESLint rule idea: `<style>` is not allowed inside _document.js | ### Describe the feature you'd like to request
As per the docs: https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/custom-document#caveats
styled-jsx is not allowed inside custom `_document.js` and I was getting 500 errors on all SSR pages when deploying a site to production that had a `<style>` tag inside a custom `_document.js`.
I think it's a good idea to add an ESLint rule to remind users about this since the error I got did not make it straightforward to figure out the root cause of the issue.
### Describe the solution you'd like
Add a new ESLint rule warning about the use of `<style>` tags inside a custom `_document.js`
### Describe alternatives you've considered
Maybe prevent the build if a `<style>` tag is detected inside a custom `_document.js` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32656 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32678 | 2f9e2415e5ab376577858c5d0a8219fef98a1138 | 11ad65e4458990653184b71f64181408b62b3d64 | "2021-12-19T14:18:04Z" | javascript | "2022-05-23T02:32:13Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,650 | ["packages/next/build/jest/jest.ts"] | Running the dev script concurrently with the Jest test script causes Jest to re-run the tests on page compilation | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.2
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
`jest --watch` re-runs the test suites every time the dev server compiles a page. This bug is present on both the babel and swc versions of the jest config.
---
I found out that the Jest watcher is watching the `.next/` folder. It used to ignore dot files and folders but that behaviour was changed last year (https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/10075). It is now necessary to specify the dot folder in `watchPathIgnorePatterns`. I created a PR with Jest to change the documentation: https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/12161
### Expected Behavior
I expect Jest in watch mode to only re-run the test suites when source files or test files have changed, not when the dev server writes to `.next/`.
### To Reproduce
**Step 1:** Set up a project with any of the Jest configurations (Babel or Swc). The project needs to have several pages to be able to navigate between them.
**Step 2:** run `yarn dev` in a terminal. In another terminal, run `yarn test`. The scripts are standard:
```json
"scripts": {
"dev": "next dev",
"test": "jest --watch"
}
```
**Step 3:** in the jest terminal, press A to run all tests.
*My original case was to add a page and a related test file. But running all tests requires less work to show the same result.*
**Step 4:** In the browser, navigate between pages.
**Result:**
- Each time a page is compiled, you get something like this in the dev server terminal (expected):
```bash
wait - compiling /about...
event - compiled successfully in 190 ms (221 modules)
```
- At the same time, in the jest terminal, the test suites are re-rerun, in spite of there being no change to the source or test files. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32650 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32659 | 8b12b174e50209b0c71e3dd588c7a0871fe79598 | 6ffa2baa4d0392cddc462eb3788b8c9befb42546 | "2021-12-19T09:55:32Z" | javascript | "2021-12-19T19:03:54Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,553 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-32553/input.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-32553/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/wasm/Cargo.toml"] | SWC Bug with JSX transpilation -- unterminated string constant | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14
### What browser are you using?
n/a
### What operating system are you using?
MacOS
### How are you deploying your application?
N/A
### Describe the Bug
I'd just like to surface this SWC bug here. If you're on Next 12, this can easily bit you, leaving you searching in vane for answers in the Next GitHub issues.
https://github.com/swc-project/swc/issues/2896
### Expected Behavior
JSX accepts strings with single quotes
### To Reproduce
See linked GH issue. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32553 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32566 | 47cd07bb75cb8c50fda3680d0f13a796b0e5b687 | 99f9be585b7c4c998763ca61f02718e8cebf4689 | "2021-12-15T22:08:31Z" | javascript | "2021-12-16T13:48:03Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,548 | ["docs/basic-features/data-fetching.md"] | Docs: getServerSideProps redirect object missing basePath | ### What is the improvement or update you wish to see?
All of the properties of the server-side redirects should be explained. Currently, [the documentation](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching#getserversideprops-server-side-rendering) only states that there are `{ destination: string, permanent: boolean }` when it speaks of the shape of the object.

However, upon digging, I discovered that there _is_ a `basePath` property when the server processes redirects [here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/59f7676966570093f56ff35fb0d83eb97b394b7b/packages/next/server/base-server.ts#L1899), unless I'm wrong in my reading of your code. If this is true though, that the redirect object in `getServerSideProps` has a `basePath`, could we please get the documentation updated to reflect this? It would be nice to see a breakdown of the properties with any additional context like we do in the next.config docs: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next.config.js/redirects
### Is there any context that might help us understand?
When working on [PR #352 in the gladly-team/next-firebase-auth repo](https://github.com/gladly-team/next-firebase-auth/pull/352), I was asked a question from the maintainer about support for SSR redirects for destinations that are outside the base path of the app. He mentioned that the documentation in the area isn't clear, so I dug into the next repo and discovered the actual behavior is through an undocumented `basePath` property: vercel/next.js@59f7676/packages/next/server/base-server.ts#L1899
### Does the docs page already exist? Please link to it.
https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching#getserversideprops-server-side-rendering | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32548 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32550 | 04fbc663f9b2637ad7b37da9d302f2240d1d2e68 | 15ff1a37d9ff027a7c03cd2c0ec0b815f93ca41c | "2021-12-15T18:51:31Z" | javascript | "2021-12-16T08:54:40Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,515 | ["packages/next/server/render.tsx", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js"] | 404 renders __NEXT_DATA__ as string to DOM when using RSC after deploy, locally no response | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8-canary.5 up to 12.0.8-canary.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
local: 14.8.1 // vercel: 14
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
When updating to newest canaries, starting by 12.0.8-canary.5, using `serverComponents: true` and `concurrentFeatures: true` the 404 page (default and custom) won't respond without error to the console.
When being deployed, the 404 renders, but with the __NEXT_DATA__ json rendered as string to the dom.
When deployed, it's looking like:

on reproducible url: https://next-rsc-demo-e3pu88wfg-klotzjesse.vercel.app/thisdoesnotexist
and console:

### Expected Behavior
Render in development.
And after deployment, without having __NEXT_DATA__ as string in the dom.
### To Reproduce
Update to canary 12.0.8-canary.5 up to .7
Activate in next.config.js
```
module.exports = {
experimental: {
reactRoot: true,
concurrentFeatures: true,
serverComponents: true,
},
}
```
Deploy to Vercel / run `yarn dev`
Run into failure
Minimal Reproduction:
Failure (server): https://next-rsc-demo-e3pu88wfg-klotzjesse.vercel.app/rsc
Running (client): https://next-rsc-demo-e3pu88wfg-klotzjesse.vercel.app
Repo: https://github.com/KlotzJesse/next-rsc-demo/tree/rsc-fails-render-with-client-error | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32515 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33399 | 6d8923768460c2c70ad76b68d8c206378976d091 | 41614e52d72f532601dc2d118f4f40dbd1e63907 | "2021-12-14T22:03:15Z" | javascript | "2022-01-17T20:27:12Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,513 | ["packages/next/build/index.ts", "packages/next/server/image-optimizer.ts"] | Using <Image /> component with-docker results in missing image-optimizer | ### What example does this report relate to?
with-docker
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
latest
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Docker
### Describe the Bug
When using the `<Image />` component in combination with the new standalone feature https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/output-file-tracing results in the `image-optimizer.js` not being part of the copied node_modules and all request to the image produce a 500 error.
Curl request to the image URL that is being requested by next.js in the frontend
```curl 'http://localhost:3000/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvia.placeholder.com%2F300&w=640&q=75' \
-H 'Connection: keep-alive' \
-H 'Pragma: no-cache' \
-H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \
-H 'sec-ch-ua: " Not A;Brand";v="99", "Chromium";v="96", "Google Chrome";v="96"' \
-H 'sec-ch-ua-mobile: ?0' \
-H 'User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.93 Safari/537.36' \
-H 'sec-ch-ua-platform: "macOS"' \
-H 'Accept: image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,image/svg+xml,image/*,*/*;q=0.8' \
-H 'Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin' \
-H 'Sec-Fetch-Mode: no-cors' \
-H 'Sec-Fetch-Dest: image' \
-H 'Referer: http://localhost:3000/' \
-H 'Accept-Language: en,en-US;q=0.9,de;q=0.8,nl;q=0.7' \
--compressed
```
result
```
Internal Server Error
```
```
Error: Cannot find module './image-optimizer'
Require stack:
- /app/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js
- /app/server.js
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:933:15)
at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:778:27)
at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:999:19)
at require (node:internal/modules/cjs/helpers:102:18)
at Object.fn (/app/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js:609:49)
at Router.execute (/app/node_modules/next/dist/server/router.js:222:48)
at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
at async Server.run (/app/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js:1135:29)
at async Server.handleRequest (/app/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js:325:20)
at async Server.<anonymous> (/app/server.js:18:5) {
code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND',
requireStack: [
'/app/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js',
'/app/server.js'
]
}
```
1. Build your container: `docker build -t nextjs-docker .`.
1. Run your container: `docker run -p 3000:3000 nextjs-docker`.
1. Connect to running container `docker exec -it $(docker ps -q) ash`
1. Navigate to server directory `cd node_modules/next/dist/server/`
2. List files in server directory `ls 0la`
Output from Docker container file system after connecting with missing `image-optimizer.js`
```
/app $ cd node_modules/next/dist/server/
/app/node_modules/next/dist/server $ ls -la
total 300
drwxr-xr-x 4 nextjs nodejs 4096 Dec 14 20:47 .
drwxr-xr-x 9 nextjs nodejs 4096 Dec 14 20:47 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 3473 Dec 14 20:47 accept-header.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 16027 Dec 14 20:47 api-utils.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 3185 Dec 14 20:47 config-shared.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 544 Dec 14 20:47 config-utils.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 24927 Dec 14 20:47 config.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 2687 Dec 14 20:47 crypto-utils.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 521 Dec 14 20:47 denormalize-page-path.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 2750 Dec 14 20:47 font-utils.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 599 Dec 14 20:47 get-page-files.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 635 Dec 14 20:47 htmlescape.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 827 Dec 14 20:47 image-config.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 6674 Dec 14 20:47 incremental-cache.js
drwxr-xr-x 2 nextjs nodejs 4096 Dec 14 20:47 lib
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 3068 Dec 14 20:47 load-components.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 88521 Dec 14 20:47 next-server.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 1492 Dec 14 20:47 node-polyfill-fetch.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 1260 Dec 14 20:47 normalize-page-path.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 454 Dec 14 20:47 optimize-amp.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 1055 Dec 14 20:47 render-result.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 51710 Dec 14 20:47 render.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 705 Dec 14 20:47 request-meta.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 3046 Dec 14 20:47 require.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 3194 Dec 14 20:47 response-cache.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 11495 Dec 14 20:47 router.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 2868 Dec 14 20:47 send-payload.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 1477 Dec 14 20:47 serve-static.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 nextjs nodejs 1102 Dec 14 20:47 utils.js
drwxr-xr-x 5 nextjs nodejs 4096 Dec 14 20:47 web
```
### Expected Behavior
`image-optimizer.js` is being part of node_modules when using standalone mode and 200 is returned with the image instead of 500
### To Reproduce
I created a minimal example here https://github.com/chrisdoc/next.js/commit/3d8eb4dbd94b0f61a94d1b8ddb71e4d56709af8e to reproduce that adds one `<Image />` tag with a reference to an external Image.
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32513 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32522 | 3da1f17d5a28662be1a20107a0361ddc44f914c4 | 5d606ebae42469ebd2c3e2bc4f94266525c59315 | "2021-12-14T21:49:11Z" | javascript | "2021-12-15T14:19:16Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,470 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-32553/input.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-32553/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/wasm/Cargo.toml"] | Sourcemaps stop working due to multiline comment + CRLF line endings | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
Happens in at least 12.0.0, 12.0.7, 12.0.8-canary.5 and 12.0.8-canary.8.
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.1
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
next dev
### Describe the Bug
When my function has a multiline comment, sourcemaps break.
I can't set a breakpoint on the first `console.log` and the variables in "Scope" make no sense:

### Expected Behavior
I expected the same behavior as when the multiline comment is removed, so being able to set a breakpoint on the first `console.log` and the "Scope" looking like this:

### To Reproduce
- Clone https://github.com/leroydev/nextjs-sourcemaps (it's a minimal working example, just 1 extra commit on top of `npx create-next-app@latest --ts`)
- Execute `yarn` to install the dependencies
- Run `yarn dev` to start Next.js in development
- Open http://localhost:3000
- Open Chrome DevTools -> CTRL + P -> `LogSomeText.ts`
- Set breakpoints inside the function and reload
You can see that when you completely remove the multiline comment in `LogSomeText.ts`, you can set a breakpoint on the first `console.log` again and the variables in the scope make sense again. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32470 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32566 | 47cd07bb75cb8c50fda3680d0f13a796b0e5b687 | 99f9be585b7c4c998763ca61f02718e8cebf4689 | "2021-12-13T20:26:09Z" | javascript | "2021-12-16T13:48:03Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,424 | ["docs/api-reference/next/server.md"] | Unable to set cookie before redirect | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.1
### What browser are you using?
Opera
### What operating system are you using?
MacOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
I cannot seem to find a way to set a cookie THEN redirect using NextResponse.
I know that i can do this
```javascript
return NextResponse.redirect("/to-here").cookie("hello", "world");
```
But actually things are a bit more complicated, i need to be able to pass the object around. like:
```javascript
const res = new NextResponse(null);
// passed to another function
res.cookie("hello", "world");
// res now has cookie "hello" set
// now redirect (but keep the "hello" cookie)
return res.redirect("/to-here");
```
Perhaps i've done something wrong, i cannot see a way to redirect and also modifying the response object how i need it.
Is it possible?
### Expected Behavior
I feel i should be able to build the response object how i see fit, but cannot seem to do it. I can't even do it manually.
### To Reproduce
try running `res.redirect()` and it will complain that it is not a function. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32424 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32542 | 738a964eade15cf9c633b99f84f273f27888d81e | 4f67edd6387bc377786f32899e5649e09f732b67 | "2021-12-12T14:25:23Z" | javascript | "2021-12-21T14:12:02Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,417 | ["examples/with-storybook-styled-jsx-scss/.storybook/preview.js", "packages/next/client/index.tsx", "packages/next/package.json", "yarn.lock"] | 4% increase in bundle size from next 11.1.2 to 12.0.7 | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.15.1
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
We have been struggling with our bundle size and put a huge effort into making it as small as possible
Going from Next v. 11.1.2 to 12.0.7 means an increase in bundlesize from 127Kb to 132 kb.
This is before and after from next build:
```
Page Size First Load JS
├ /_app 0 B 75.8 kB
├ ● /[...slug] (ISR: 3600 Seconds) (122414 ms) 14.1 kB 127 kB
```
We tried enabling and disabling swcMinify in next.config.js without any noticeable difference
```
Page Size First Load JS
├ /_app 0 B 80.6 kB
├ ● /[...slug] (ISR: 3600 Seconds) (123146 ms) 14 kB 132 kB
```
Is this to be expected?
### Expected Behavior
Same of less size. Not bigger.
### To Reproduce
The difference in percentage would differ from project to project. To reproduce just monitoring bundle "First Load JS" from next build reveals the problem | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32417 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32730 | b6fb52bbb04f4259b3a6528b7aeaa753c5f3b23f | ec3ca398cbd17a674fe0efe67a2763baf6490324 | "2021-12-12T10:40:35Z" | javascript | "2021-12-22T13:38:27Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,360 | ["packages/next/compiled/webpack/bundle5.js", "packages/next/package.json", "yarn.lock"] | ReferenceError: Cannot access '__WEBPACK_DEFAULT_EXPORT__' before initialization | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.1
### What browser are you using?
N/A
### What operating system are you using?
macOS, Alpine
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
A module which imports an es module and throws an exception at the top level has the exception swallowed and a different (vastly less helpful) exception thrown instead. I am pretty confident that this is a webpack bug, but since next vendors webpack, I'm reporting here.
### Expected Behavior
When a module throws an exception during initialization, the exception should be passed to the nearest user exception handler, or crash the application. Instead, a different exception is being thrown due to webpack-generated code.
### To Reproduce
Create a file `lib/test.ts` like the following; require it from any page (I used an API page, may be relevant); request that page.
```javascript
import { z } from "zod";
throw new Error("error");
export default { z };
```
You will see the following error in the console, without any stack trace:
```
error - ReferenceError: Cannot access '__WEBPACK_DEFAULT_EXPORT__' before initialization
```
Things to note:
1. "zod" could be replaced by any esmodule package. The root cause is that the code generated by webpack uses a dynamic `import` to import the code, causing to to be an async module.
2. Exporting `{ z }` is just so that the import doesn't get tree-shaken-away. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32360 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33831 | a7793c7a0c5c5e4496594a3010152cfba31920de | 3ba3bb8d6d8f7ac2dfda1c292fa831b9010c599d | "2021-12-10T08:47:42Z" | javascript | "2022-02-01T19:27:31Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,338 | ["packages/next/server/render.tsx"] | Make missing Document components trigger an error for production builds | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.05 and above
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.17.6
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Other platform
### Describe the Bug
When the user is a bot we only want to serve a plain version of the page without any javascript, but since version 12.05 if we do not include NextScript it triggers a 500 Server error.
### Expected Behavior
If we do not include NextScript it should render a version without javascripts, since [this PR](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31505) was merged we can not do it anymore. As far as I knew, requiring NextScripts for dev environments made total sense because it could not work without javascript in the client side, but in production we have cases where we do not want to send any javascript to the user and the page should be a plain html.
In the mentioned PR, the production check was removed.
### To Reproduce
- Remove NextScript from a custom _document.js
- Requesting any page will trigger a 500 error NextScript must be present. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32338 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32345 | 10d814d31ace05ac00946ab6396df5c57ca54f03 | eba9da09eb1d374a0dff5e782b9791bb76759524 | "2021-12-09T21:00:33Z" | javascript | "2021-12-13T22:47:34Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,332 | ["packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-middleware-ssr-loader/render.ts", "packages/next/client/index.tsx", "packages/next/client/rsc.ts", "packages/next/rsc.d.ts", "packages/next/rsc.js", "packages/next/server/render.tsx"] | API to refresh the server root with props | To provide a way for client components to re-render the server component root from the client, with updated props, we need a new API `unstable_useRefreshRoot`. It works similar to the "location" thing in the very first RSC demo:
```js
// foo.client.js
const refresh = unstable_useRefreshRoot()
refresh({ ...props })
```
where `props` is a serializable object. When calling `refresh`, the RSC root will be re-rendered with these additional `props`. Also this API isn't allowed to be used on the server side.
As a note, we will need to move the implementation of this API into `ServerRoot` after #30994 lands. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32332 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32342 | 55d8a14e8a0adfd2ae4e09113076ef33615564ba | 6f8cf675d32bc244883113059622a10a7d8dc49a | "2021-12-09T18:32:47Z" | javascript | "2021-12-10T10:22:31Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,312 | ["packages/next/compiled/escape-string-regexp/index.js", "packages/next/taskfile.js"] | IE11 & Next.js 12 version have syntax error with rewrites in next.config.js | ### What example does this report relate to?
with rewrites in next.config.js
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.17.0
### What browser are you using?
ie11
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
next dev, next build, next start
### Describe the Bug
Use npx create-next-app@latest (clear project)
Add any rewrites https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next.config.js/rewrites

Have Syntax Error in ie11
The error appears in version 12
### Expected Behavior
I expected to start without errors in ie11
### To Reproduce
1) Install: npx create-next-app@latest (clear project)
2) Add any rewrites: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next.config.js/rewrites

3) Have Syntax Error in ie11 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32312 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32310 | 3ca0ac7f74fb114e2d0453cfcb49bd2e97107bc0 | 0b1c9ec47dd3ea96f6ce5d2eec1eaa85e8cd97da | "2021-12-09T10:28:13Z" | javascript | "2021-12-09T19:31:53Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,302 | ["packages/next/shared/lib/router/router.ts", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/_interface/[...parts].js", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/interface/_middleware.js", "test/integration/middleware/core/test/index.test.js"] | Middleware rewrites causing router.replace issue | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.7
### What version of Node.js are you using?
17.0.1
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
We have a _middleware that rewrites requests on a special domain to "_dashboard/<pathname>". For example, loading "dashboard.localhost:3000/example/page" does a `NextResponse.rewrite('/_dashboard/example/page')`. Under the hood, we have a page at `pages/_dashboard/[...parts].tsx` to handle the request.
The issue comes from the main Next.js Container trying to do a `router.replace` with `href` equal to `/_dashboard/[...parts]` and `as` equal to `/example/page`, with the code causing that here: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/d1a1a4c0f7561235394bdb1911f8a1c99ccdd237/packages/next/client/index.tsx#L213
That `router.replace` call runs into an error: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/incompatible-href-as since the `as` and `href` don't match.
### Expected Behavior
I think the Container should call something like `router.replace('/_dashboard/example/page', '/_dashboard/example/page')`, though to be honest, I'm not 100% sure on how the router should work on domains where middleware is rewriting requests.
### To Reproduce
Repro: https://github.com/mmmulani/middleware-bug
`npm run dev` and then navigating to `http://localhost:3000/test` or `http://dashboard.localhost:3000/test` causes the error to show
Create a dynamic page that can be exported and serve it on a different domain using a middleware.
FWIW, it seems like this can be worked around by returning `{}` from `getInitialProps` on the page component. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32302 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32534 | e75361fd03872b097e817634c049b3185f24cf56 | 3da1f17d5a28662be1a20107a0361ddc44f914c4 | "2021-12-08T20:54:50Z" | javascript | "2021-12-15T13:33:13Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,123 | ["packages/next/server/next-server.ts", "test/production/typescript-basic.test.ts"] | Breaking API change in types from 12.0.4 to 12.0.5 | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.5
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.1
### What browser are you using?
Not applicable
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
using custom server
### Describe the Bug
The update from `12.0.4` to `12.0.5` including a breaking API change when calling the `createServer` function.
In 12.0.4 with TypeScript this compiles fine:
```
const app = next({
dir: './src',
dev: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production',
conf: {
compress: false,
} as NextServerOptions['conf'],
quiet: false,
});
const requestHandler = app.getRequestHandler();
```
In version 12.0.5 the above generates the following TypeError:
```
src/index.ts:9:3 - error TS2322: Type '{ compress: false; }' is not assignable to type 'NextConfigComplete'.
Type '{ compress: false; }' is missing the following properties from type 'Required<NextConfig>': i18n, eslint, typescr
ipt, headers, and 33 more.
9 conf: {
~~~~
../../node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.d.ts:34:5
34 conf: NextConfigComplete;
~~~~
The expected type comes from property 'conf' which is declared here on type 'Partial<Options>'
Found 1 error.
```
### Expected Behavior
Existing `createServer` configuration would continue to work in patch versions, especially when the release notes say "This upgrade is completely backward-compatible and recommended for all users on versions below 12.0.5. A backport of the patch to Next.js 11 will be available later today."
### To Reproduce
1. `npx create-next-app@latest --typescript`
1. Change version of `next` and `eslint-config-next` in generated `package.json` to 12.0.4
1. Run `yarn` to get the downgraded version
1. Create `server.ts` with following contents
import next from 'next';
const app = next({
dir: '.',
dev: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production',
conf: {
compress: false,
},
quiet: false,
});
const requestHandler = app.getRequestHandler();
1. Execute `yarn run tsc` to check types, there should be no type errors
1. Change version of `next` and `eslint-config-next` in generated `package.json` to 12.0.5
1. Run `yarn` to get the version 12.0.5
1. Execute `yarn run tsc` to check types, receiving the following error
server.ts:5:3 - error TS2322: Type '{ compress: false; }' is not assignable to type 'NextConfigComplete'.
Type '{ compress: false; }' is missing the following properties from type 'Required<NextConfig>': i18n, eslint, typescript, headers, and 33 more.
5 conf: {
~~~~
node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.d.ts:34:5
34 conf: NextConfigComplete;
~~~~
The expected type comes from property 'conf' which is declared here on type 'Partial<Options>'
Found 1 error.
error Command failed with exit code 2. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32123 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32134 | c1a1aa4ae2e0ba5d7c4ba023686c29d592c60c87 | 769d68047bf61cf40f178da08da3c2a98732df7b | "2021-12-04T14:14:14Z" | javascript | "2021-12-04T22:57:54Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,121 | ["packages/eslint-plugin-next/lib/rules/no-server-import-in-page.js", "test/unit/eslint-plugin-next/no-server-import-in-page.test.ts"] | next/server should not be imported outside of pages/_middleware.js | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.6
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.2
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
I have added _middleware.tsx file in /pages/login/_middleware.tsx and it gives error.
### Expected Behavior
It should not give any error
### To Reproduce
My files
_middleware.tsx
```ts
import type { NextRequest } from "next/server";
import { NextResponse } from "next/server";
export const middleware = (req: NextRequest) => {
const cookie = req.cookies["auth"];
if (cookie) {
return NextResponse.redirect("/");
}
};
```
Folder structure
<img width="259" alt="Screenshot 2021-12-04 at 7 29 54 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32234038/144712222-5abbc69c-f61f-42cf-99f9-51a3ddc63f9d.png">
<img width="1123" alt="Screenshot 2021-12-04 at 7 30 06 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32234038/144712234-4a6b2815-59c0-41ff-b9de-c8b0a47c7d8c.png">
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32121 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32139 | 20814c34f57e2b1eaf420dab10e265fc815b4114 | 5b4e139ddecb5e8eb37b31c8d7ab691ae0c27747 | "2021-12-04T14:00:37Z" | javascript | "2021-12-05T14:41:10Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 32,031 | ["package.json"] | Running test locally always fails | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.1
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
yarn test
### Describe the Bug
Everytime I try to run the tests I get the error below.
I have been running a single test using `node ./node_modules/.bin/jest -- test/development/acceptance/ReactRefreshLogBox.test.ts` and writing `.only` for a single test.
```
...
> Loading browser with http://localhost:58844/
at Object.webdriver [as default] (lib/next-webdriver.ts:58:13)
error - ./node_modules/next/dist/client/dev/amp-dev.js
TypeError: Cannot read property 'error' of undefined
(node:29703) [DEP_WEBPACK_MODULE_ISSUER] DeprecationWarning: Module.issuer: Use new ModuleGraph API
(Use `node --trace-deprecation ...` to show where the warning was created)
wait - compiling /_error (client and server)...
error - ./node_modules/next/dist/client/dev/amp-dev.js
TypeError: Cannot read property 'error' of undefined
error - Error: Cannot find module '/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/.next/fallback-build-manifest.json'
Require stack:
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/load-components.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/utils.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/output/store.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/output/index.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/cli/next-dev.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/bin/next
Error: Cannot find module '/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/.next/fallback-build-manifest.json'
Require stack:
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/load-components.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/utils.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/output/store.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/output/index.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/cli/next-dev.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/bin/next
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:902:15)
at Function.mod._resolveFilename (/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/webpack/require-hook.js:171:28)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:746:27)
at Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:974:19)
at require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:93:18)
at Object.loadDefaultErrorComponents (/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/load-components.js:22:24)
at DevServer.getFallbackErrorComponents (/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/dev/next-dev-server.js:679:43)
at async DevServer.renderErrorToResponse (/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js:1730:40)
at async pipe.req.req (/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js:1670:30)
at async DevServer.pipe (/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js:1148:25) {
code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND',
requireStack: [
'/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/load-components.js',
'/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/utils.js',
'/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/output/store.js',
'/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/output/index.js',
'/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/cli/next-dev.js',
'/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/bin/next'
]
}
error - Error: Cannot find module '/private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/.next/fallback-build-manifest.json'
Require stack:
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/server/load-components.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/utils.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/output/store.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/build/output/index.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/cli/next-dev.js
- /private/var/folders/md/c2qmk35d0j90c__dm0yn5cgw0000gn/T/next-install-1638432702733/node_modules/next/dist/bin/next
console.log
browser log: Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 500 (Internal Server Error)
...
```
### Expected Behavior
Tests to pass
### To Reproduce
> Clone rep
> yarn
> yarn test
or
> node ./node_modules/.bin/jest -- test/development/acceptance/ReactRefreshLogBox.test.ts | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32031 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32042 | 31d2184972097741cadcbee534b018fac1cf9de0 | b6914198b4f6ddbec39aaeea50b02035e3c0e58f | "2021-12-02T08:20:04Z" | javascript | "2021-12-03T06:02:59Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,993 | ["packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-middleware-ssr-loader/index.ts", "packages/next/server/base-server.ts", "packages/next/server/load-components.ts", "packages/next/server/render.tsx", "test/integration/react-18/test/index.test.js"] | Pages wrapped with React.memo don’t work if concurrentFeatures is enabled | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4 / 12.0.5-canary.12
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.11.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next dev
### Describe the Bug
If you enable `experimental.concurrentFeatures` and export a page component wrapped with `React.memo` you hit the following error:
> error - Error: Your page must export a `default` component
### Expected Behavior
No error, page uses React.memo.
### To Reproduce
See https://github.com/davecardwell/nextjs-memo-page-repro for reproduction, or follow the steps below:
```sh
yarn create next-app
# modify pages/index.js to wrap default export in React.memo()
yarn dev
# confirm that the page renders
yarn add react@beta react-dom@beta
# modify next.config.js to set experimental.concurrentFeatures to true
yarn dev
# confirm that the page does not render and you see the following error in the terminal:
# error - Error: Your page must export a `default` component
``` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31993 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/34526 | 4ad1c5a2bc3384d0eeaef2d05452748a3a9ae467 | ce76d1712e98d7310385c89ec1917242f7c5111c | "2021-12-01T05:38:08Z" | javascript | "2022-02-18T15:25:10Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,911 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/next_ssg.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/page_config.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/shake_exports.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/full/auto-cjs/1/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/full/example/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/src/bundle/mod.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/wasm/Cargo.toml"] | Swipe on ionic menu doesn't works with swcMinify on start | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome, Firefox
### What operating system are you using?
Windows 11
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel, next start
### Describe the Bug
The swipe gesture of the '@ionic/react' menu only works in dev, when doing build and start stops working and blocks the animation of the menu. swcMinify option was enable in both cases.
The toggle button works in both dev and build.
Version
@ionic/react: "^5.9.1"
### Expected Behavior
The swipe gesture should work correctly when doing build and start with the swcMinify option enabled
### To Reproduce
https://github.com/Josyto/next-swc-ionic-menu | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31911 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33063 | 320986a2b897bc512c21f7148f4a4c8ce749dcae | 87dbd03eb0ca738fbf669e1f03826af6e59b9b27 | "2021-11-29T09:11:53Z" | javascript | "2022-01-10T10:37:32Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,855 | ["packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/next_ssg.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/ssg/getStaticProps/issue-31855/input.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/ssg/getStaticProps/issue-31855/output.js"] | Exported members that are used in SSR/SSG/ISG page function are undefined on the client (Attempted import error: '..' is not exported from '..' (imported as '..').) | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.1
### What browser are you using?
Chrome Version 96 (Official Build) (64-bit)
### What operating system are you using?
Ubuntu 20.04 via WSL 2 & Windows 10
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
When you export a member that is used in the page function of `getStaticProps`, it will be `undefined` on the client.
For example:
```ts
// pages/index.tsx
export const revalidateInSeconds = 5 * 60;
export const getStaticProps: GetStaticProps = async () => {
return {
props: {},
revalidate: revalidateInSeconds,
};
};
// components/TestComponent.tsx
import { revalidateInSeconds } from "../pages";
export function TestComponent(): JSX.Element {
console.log("revalidateInSeconds: ", revalidateInSeconds);
return <p>Test component</p>;
}
```
### Expected Behavior
Exported variables shouldn't be `undefined` on the client.
### To Reproduce
## Reproduction repo
I created a reproduction repo for this bug:
[https://github.com/bennettdams/nextjs-bug-export-undefined](https://github.com/bennettdams/nextjs-bug-export-undefined)
1. `git clone [email protected]:bennettdams/nextjs-bug-export-undefined.git`
2. `npm i`
3. `npm run build`
4. `npm run start`
### OR
## Manual reproduce
1. [Create Next.js app](https://github.com/bennettdams/nextjs-bug-export-undefined/commit/0c812c6fcc7f86a6d49b6c51c94669fc0574b48e): `npx create-next-app@latest --use-npm --ts .`
2. [Add `getStaticProps` and a `const` to export](https://github.com/bennettdams/nextjs-bug-export-undefined/commit/851a9b4e12699c505dc82cc0c587b9abdf3160c6):
```tsx
export const revalidateInSeconds = 5 * 60;
export const getStaticProps: GetStaticProps = async () => {
return {
props: {},
revalidate: revalidateInSeconds,
};
};
```
3. [Add a test component](https://github.com/bennettdams/nextjs-bug-export-undefined/commit/65064110c06af6b6ef20aa08a1e6f49078af45d4) that logs the imported `const` (`revalidateInSeconds`) and use the component on the page:
```tsx
// components/TestComponent.tsx
import { revalidateInSeconds } from "../pages";
export function TestComponent(): JSX.Element {
console.log("revalidateInSeconds: ", revalidateInSeconds);
return <p>Test component</p>;
}
// pages/index.ts
...
<main className={styles.main}>
<TestComponent />
<h1 className={styles.title}>
Welcome to <a href="https://nextjs.org">Next.js!</a>
...
```
4. Build & start the app: `npm run build` & `npm run start`
# Results, looking at the console logs
### Terminal that is used for building:
<details>
<summary>Click for text!</summary>
```
> next build
info - Checking validity of types
info - Creating an optimized production build
warn - Compiled with warnings
./components/TestComponent.tsx
Attempted import error: 'revalidateInSeconds' is not exported from '../pages' (imported as 'revalidateInSeconds').
Import trace for requested module:
./pages/index.tsx
info - Collecting page data
```
</details>

### Browser:

---
## Additional information:
- When you run `npm run dev` instead of using the build, you can see that the `console.log` on the server actually has the value, instead of being `undefined`:

Just on the client it is still `undefined`.
- I checked this behavior also for Next.js `v11.1.2` - there, it is not happening. The variable has its value on the client as expected.
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31855 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/36199 | 44c7fd79994d4515dd47e3c8ac94cb0e9f670027 | deb82802a4d112079ca6fcaa4bca4054d25cec3b | "2021-11-26T16:44:50Z" | javascript | "2022-04-19T12:13:57Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,827 | ["packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "test/integration/middleware/hmr/node_modules/shared-package/index.js", "test/integration/middleware/hmr/node_modules/shared-package/package.json", "test/integration/middleware/hmr/pages/about/_middleware.js", "test/integration/middleware/hmr/pages/index.js"] | Fast refresh not working properly due to page reload when compiling middleware | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome, Safari, Edge
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next dev
### Describe the Bug
Since I don't know the technological background or necessity of the page reload for `middleware`, I'm not sure if that's something that you have to live with when working with `middleware` - but any change, like edits made to react components, often trigger a page reload due to the `middleware` being compiled:
> wait - compiling /_middleware (middleware only)...
This becomes especially frustrating when working with `getStaticProps`.
### Expected Behavior
No page reload when applying changes ("Fast Refresh").
### To Reproduce
Basic `middleware` implementation. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31827 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33873 | 4786557908f000511198e103371e383c1b540150 | a803638da2483f0c468522d5da1037657af53e05 | "2021-11-26T11:36:49Z" | javascript | "2022-02-01T21:46:07Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,757 | ["packages/next-swc/.cargo/config.toml", "packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/wasm/Cargo.toml"] | TS behaviour of break and continue swap after forEach usage | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.04
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Window
### How are you deploying your application?
yarn dev
### Describe the Bug
TS behaviour of "break" and "continue" swap after a "forEach".
switching the break/continue around seem to help.
but sometime the break break out of both loop.
### Expected Behavior
#### Console
message 0 x 1 y a
message 1 x 2 y a
message 2 x 3 y a
message 3 x 4 y a
message 4 x 5 y a
### To Reproduce
#### Code
let message = 0;
for (let x of [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) {
for (let y of ["a", "b", "c", "d"]) {
console.log("Message", ++message, x, y);
[].forEach(() => {});
break;
}
}
console.log("WHY", message == 5);
#### Console
message 0 x 1 y a
#### Generate Code
var message = 0;
var _iteratorNormalCompletion5 = true, _didIteratorError5 = false, _iteratorError5 = undefined;
try {
var _loop = function(_iterator5, _step5) {
var x = _step5.value;
var _iteratorNormalCompletion = true, _didIteratorError = false, _iteratorError = undefined;
try {
for(var _iterator = [
"a",
"b",
"c",
"d"
][Symbol.iterator](), _step; !(_iteratorNormalCompletion = (_step = _iterator.next()).done); _iteratorNormalCompletion = true){
var y = _step.value;
console.log("message", message++, "x", x, "y", y);
[].forEach(function() {
});
return "break";
}
} catch (err) {
_didIteratorError = true;
_iteratorError = err;
} finally{
try {
if (!_iteratorNormalCompletion && _iterator.return != null) {
_iterator.return();
}
} finally{
if (_didIteratorError) {
throw _iteratorError;
}
}
}
};
for(var _iterator5 = [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5
][Symbol.iterator](), _step5; !(_iteratorNormalCompletion5 = (_step5 = _iterator5.next()).done); _iteratorNormalCompletion5 = true){
var _ret = _loop(_iterator5, _step5);
if (_ret === "break") break;
}
} catch (err) {
_didIteratorError5 = true;
_iteratorError5 = err;
} finally{
try {
if (!_iteratorNormalCompletion5 && _iterator5.return != null) {
_iterator5.return();
}
} finally{
if (_didIteratorError5) {
throw _iteratorError5;
}
}
}
console.log("WHY", message == 5); | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31757 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31963 | 85e578a90616ba5ccf809141816045e65284d08c | 12b44e279bd0958373c1bc31ba4b9a55f4d3cdbc | "2021-11-24T07:06:27Z" | javascript | "2021-11-30T15:12:37Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,755 | ["packages/next/lib/helpers/should-use-yarn.ts", "packages/next/lib/install-dependencies.ts"] | `next lint` installs stuff using yarn but there's no `yarn.lock` on my project but it does have a `package-lock.json` | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.5-canary.8
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
`next lint` installs stuff using yarn but there's no `yarn.lock` on my project but it does have a `package-lock.json`.

### Expected Behavior
Should use NPM instead of Yarn.
### To Reproduce

| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31755 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31926 | 1aeb230839e5f2578936f6595969c7b608aa190b | 2ea2c81f52b74b96f65ba4e2a08e404d31d5205b | "2021-11-24T06:11:21Z" | javascript | "2022-02-05T20:16:25Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,742 | ["packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/lib.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/shake_exports.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/shake-exports/keep-default/input.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/shake-exports/keep-default/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/shake-exports/most-usecases/input.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/shake-exports/most-usecases/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/full.rs"] | Tree shaking next-swc transformation | ### Describe the feature you'd like to request
Add an optional next-swc transform to treeshake unused exports
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31742 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32253 | 9c1b183a9cc969f59ab68e0bc6230f6d23b8d79f | 0f7f3323c180ebe7046187f3e338a8d818405ea7 | "2021-11-23T17:45:02Z" | javascript | "2021-12-08T19:04:13Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,685 | ["packages/next-swc/crates/napi/src/transform.rs", "packages/next/build/swc/index.js", "packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-swc-loader.js"] | Read file source in next-swc when next-swc-loader is used | Currently webpack reads the file and passes the contents to next-swc, we can reduce some overhead by passing the file path to next-swc and then reading/transforming it in next-swc. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31685 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31682 | b71f9d9475f0a1790744fe4c9e8d125d50c66f4a | a4159321b20148ff2f9f6fa847395a8c8162dbef | "2021-11-22T12:27:05Z" | javascript | "2021-11-25T14:00:14Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,680 | ["packages/next/shared/lib/router/router.ts", "test/e2e/middleware-general/app/middleware.js", "test/e2e/middleware-general/app/next.config.js", "test/e2e/middleware-general/app/pages/shallow.js", "test/e2e/middleware-general/test/index.test.ts"] | Unable to disable prefetch on `Router.push()` | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
MacOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
Calling `Router.push()` is triggering a prefetch request but the downstream service does not allow HEAD requests and is returning 405.
Similar to the `prefetch={false}` prop on the `<Link />` component, would it be possible to disable prefetching when using `Router.push()`?
### Expected Behavior
I can disable prefetching on `push()`
### To Reproduce
```ts
// Bring in routing functionality from next router hook
const { push } = useRouter();
// Create a function to handle logging out through Ory
const handleLogOut = useCallback(async () => {
const logoutUrl = await axios({
url: `${API_URL}/self-service/logout/browser`,
method: "get",
headers: {
"content-type": "application/json",
accept: "application/json",
},
withCredentials: true,
});
push(logoutUrl.data.logout_url);
}, [push]);
``` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31680 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37716 | bf7bf8217f0d3df37d740a0cebf2f140e9c518b6 | 7193effcc09f9347f51bd73fac6860c30e4c6acc | "2021-11-22T10:23:17Z" | javascript | "2022-06-15T15:09:13Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,675 | ["docs/advanced-features/static-html-export.md", "packages/next/build/entries.ts", "packages/next/build/index.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "packages/next/server/dev/hot-reloader.ts", "test/integration/react-18/app/pages/_document.js"] | 500 Error can not use getInitialProps with getStaticProps after updated react 18, next 12 | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next dev
### Describe the Bug
I updated react to version `0.0.0-experimental-149b420f6-20211119` (I heard it as a newest experimantal version, 18) due to use a suspense for my project. (I don't have a plan to use a server component).
So I followed all the steps [React 18](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/react-18)
And also I updated next to v12
But I couldn't get a beta version through `npm install next@latest react@beta react-dom@beta` so I tried like this way
`npm install react@beta react-dom@beta --save --legacy-peer-deps`
And I added a
```
module.exports = {
experimental: {
concurrentFeatures: true
}
}
```
Eventually I encountered all this error in every page.
`Error: You can not use getInitialProps with getStaticProps. To use SSG, please remove your getInitialProps /` in main page,
`Error: 'getInitialProps' in Document component is not supported with 'concurrentFeatures' enabled.` in another pages.
I don't use any getInitialProps in my project.
### Expected Behavior
I think there could be some error in downloading a react 18 I mentioned.
### To Reproduce


| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31675 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31954 | 6e6bd2158ffae0296b08e7c89928844fa9dd32b0 | 85e578a90616ba5ccf809141816045e65284d08c | "2021-11-22T07:30:23Z" | javascript | "2021-11-30T12:52:14Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,627 | ["packages/next/build/swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next/build/swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-31627/input.js", "packages/next/build/swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-31627/output.js"] | Wrong scope for `this` in functions inside classes with SWC compiler. | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
MacOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Irrelevant
### Describe the Bug
When turning on SWC for compilation, functions in classes get the wrong `this`. We have a lot of D3-code, where scoped function-`this` is used a lot. Upgrading to Next.js v12 with SWC we get `TypeError: this.querySelectorAll is not a function` from our D3 code. It looks like it only happens when the anonymous functions are contained in a class.
When adding a .babelrc to disable SWC, this runs just fine.
### Expected Behavior
This code should not crash.
### To Reproduce
I produced a minimal repro https://github.com/Jakst/d3-this-next-v12
Here's the relevant code
```javascript
import { useEffect } from 'react'
import { select, selectAll } from 'd3-selection'
export default function Home() {
useEffect(() => {
new MyClass()
}, [])
return (
<svg>
<g className="group">
<path />
<path />
</g>
<g className="group">
<path />
<path />
</g>
</svg>
)
}
class MyClass {
constructor() {
selectAll('.group').each(function () {
select(this).selectAll('path')
})
}
}
```
Visit a page with that component when SWC compilation is used and the rendering will crash. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31627 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31639 | f52211bad39c2a29a7caba40bfeb89b600524b41 | 3146ed37f83c0ccade1e2c475a04d82b681385ea | "2021-11-19T17:15:02Z" | javascript | "2021-11-20T19:25:52Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,591 | ["packages/next/build/output/log.ts", "packages/next/server/dev/next-dev-server.ts", "test/integration/custom-server/server.js", "test/integration/custom-server/test/index.test.js", "test/integration/server-side-dev-errors/pages/uncaught-empty-exception.js", "test/integration/server-side-dev-errors/pages/uncaught-empty-rejection.js", "test/integration/server-side-dev-errors/test/index.test.js"] | Next.js don't show stack trace for unhandled rejection errors | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.1
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug

I can't debug or fix an error that I have no idea where it is.
### Expected Behavior
It should show the complete stack trace for errors.
### To Reproduce
Trigger an unhandled rejection errors. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31591 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/36804 | 6f344e661723135e48266ac57116cc4b50636475 | 2e135346cf0847efd85329fb77e86f9e21ad417a | "2021-11-18T21:08:27Z" | javascript | "2022-05-11T17:02:15Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,562 | ["packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/lib.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/styled_jsx/mod.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/styled_jsx/transform_css.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/styled-jsx/issue-31562-interpolation-in-mdea/input.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/styled-jsx/issue-31562-interpolation-in-mdea/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/full.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/src/transform.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/wasm/src/lib.rs"] | @media query interpolation broken in 12.0.4 | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
v16.11.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
next dev
### Describe the Bug
PR #31407 fixed #30480 but introduced a new issue where interpolated strings in media queries are sometimes unnecessarily parenthesized.
Consider this, which used to work in 12.0.3 and before:
```ts
/// theme.ts
// Media Queries
export const Target: { [size in ScreenSizeQuery]: string } &
{ [prop in OtherQueries]: string } = {
smallOnly: "screen and (max-width: 580px)",
smallPlus: "screen and (min-width: 580px)",
mediumPlus: "screen and (min-width: 700px)",
largePlus: "screen and (min-width: 900px)",
xlPlus: "screen and (min-width: 1200px)",
touchScreen: "(hover: none), (pointer: coarse)",
};
```
And elsewhere in JSX:
```tsx
/// _app.tsx
// ...
<style jsx global>{`
html {
font-size: ${Typography.base.size.default};
line-height: ${Typography.base.lineHeight};
}
@media ${Target.mediumPlus} {
html {
font-size: ${Typography.base.size.mediumPlus};
}
}
@media ${Target.largePlus} {
html {
font-size: ${Typography.base.size.largePlus};
}
}
`}</style>
// ...
```
### Expected Behavior
This should compile into:
```css
html {
font-size: 16px;
line-height: 1.75;
}
@media screen and (min-width: 700px) {
html {
font-size:18px;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 900px) {
html {
font-size:21px;
}
}
```
### To Reproduce
Instead, in 12.0.4, it compiles into:
```css
html {font-size:16px; line-height:1.75}
@media (screen and (min-width: 700px)) {html {font-size:18px}}
@media (screen and (min-width: 900px)) {html {font-size:21px}}
```
Notably, this should be `@media screen and (min-width: 700px) {}` rather than `@media (screen and (min-width: 700px)) {}`. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31562 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32490 | 15ff1a37d9ff027a7c03cd2c0ec0b815f93ca41c | 47cd07bb75cb8c50fda3680d0f13a796b0e5b687 | "2021-11-18T01:36:02Z" | javascript | "2021-12-16T11:23:31Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,536 | ["packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/next_ssg.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/ssg/getStaticProps/should-not-remove-import-used-in-render/input.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/fixture/ssg/getStaticProps/should-not-remove-import-used-in-render/output.js"] | Unwanted code elimination when using a component in `getStaticProps` | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
v14.15.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
-
### Describe the Bug
I'm encountering a runtime error, since Next.js seems to be eliminating a component from a function where it is needed.
It seems to occur when a component is used both on the page and in `getStaticProps`.
```tsx
function PageLayout({children}) {
return <div style={{background: 'gray'}}>{children}</div>;
}
export default function Index() {
// ReferenceError: PageLayout is not defined
return <PageLayout>Index</PageLayout>
}
export function getStaticProps() {
// When this line is removed, the page no longer breaks
console.log(PageLayout.name);
return {
props: {}
};
}
```
<img width="996" alt="Screenshot 2021-11-17 at 16 05 44" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4038316/142225906-1f10a9c7-7077-44ad-bba4-2eacc53daa9b.png">
Note that the example is intended to be minimal, in my application the usage of the layout component in `getStaticProps` serves a meaningful purpose. In Next.js 11 the above code works flawlessly.
### Expected Behavior
No runtime error
### To Reproduce
1. Clone https://github.com/amannn/next-compile-bug
2. Follow the reproduction steps in the README | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31536 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32709 | 5f4947e5a2c75099f7466a6ba8274d8ab4240e6c | 600f113358f8074f69682c7199435e30149633a7 | "2021-11-17T14:57:45Z" | javascript | "2022-01-11T13:02:24Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,533 | ["packages/next/server/web/next-url.ts", "test/unit/web-runtime/next-url.test.ts"] | Inconsistent behaviour of `request.nextUrl.href` | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
I'm attempting to use Middleware to force a default locale in my application URLs, using [example code from the documentation](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/i18n-routing#prefixing-the-default-locale).
This worked when accessing the application through `localhost`, but when accessing using any other hostname, `request.nextUrl.href` contains the full URL. I'm not sure whether this is expected behaviour, but it seems like it could be a bug as this breaks the example code provided in the documentation.
### Expected Behavior
For `request.nextUrl.href` to behave consistently. Either return the full URL, or the application path. Ideally the latter, as the example indicates this would be expected behaviour.
### To Reproduce
Take this simple middleware:
```ts
import type { NextFetchEvent, NextRequest } from 'next/server'
export function middleware(request: NextRequest, event: NextFetchEvent) {
return new Response(request.nextUrl.href)
}
```
`curl` the app using localhost, see the following:
```
$ curl http://localhost:3000/hello
/hello
```
But when using any other IP or hostname:
```
$ curl http://127.0.0.1:3000/hello
https://127.0.0.1:3000/hello
``` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31533 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31603 | 9652bdd65393736463f124b9461d8c087562268b | f52211bad39c2a29a7caba40bfeb89b600524b41 | "2021-11-17T12:02:44Z" | javascript | "2021-11-19T21:24:22Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,523 | ["packages/next/server/next-server.ts", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/rewrites/[param].js", "test/integration/middleware/core/pages/rewrites/_middleware.js", "test/integration/middleware/core/test/index.test.js"] | Middleware NextResponse.rewrite() crashes on colons in paths | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.10.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome 95
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
Using `NextResponse.rewrite("/:blahblah")` in a middleware to navigate to a path with a colon in it causes an obtuse `TypeError: Expected "blahblah" to be a string` style error(ultimately coming from `path-to-regexp`).
### Expected Behavior
Rewriting to a path with a colon in it to simply work without any unexpected replacement being attempted internally.
### To Reproduce
something like this in any middleware
```js
import { NextResponse } from "next/server";
export default function middleware() {
return NextResponse.rewrite("/not-a:param");
}
```
repro repo here: https://github.com/klarstrup/next-middleware-rewrite-bug | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31523 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32543 | 728d82663c9c65b12c22c02de815297c56a3ff53 | 2c7f8b3d7b098d5f0847662c1b1ee1a10f1efbc1 | "2021-11-17T00:05:52Z" | javascript | "2022-03-03T19:36:53Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,513 | ["examples/with-playwright/styles/Home.module.css"] | Playwright tests do not work on Github CI | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.x
### What browser are you using?
Chrome Headless
### What operating system are you using?
Ubuntu 18/20
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
I did several tests this week and couldn't find the reason why nextjs doesn't work with headless on CI.
The test code can be found at https://github.com/etc-tiago/demo-nextjs-playwright-github-workflow
The start code is https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/with-playwright
Among the attempts are:
- use the `next dev` command to start and test with playwright
- use `next build` and `next start` and then start playwright.
- use the `next build` command and start `next start` within playwright's web server settings.
Apparently there's something with react's hooks. Because the clicks on the button that use the next/router and switch of states are not working. Clicks on <a> links work normally.
I did other tests using create-react-app, to validate if it's something related to react or nextjs, and the tests worked.
### Expected Behavior
Tests pass when executing actions using hooks, such as useRouter (next/router) during tests with playwright
### To Reproduce
The test code can be found at https://github.com/etc-tiago/demo-nextjs-playwright-github-workflow | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31513 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/36705 | cefb944ee5c04396707fca54a731d5458cf4e70b | 08ffbc9e09ab9557946631cdfdbb5128e53a5326 | "2021-11-16T20:41:49Z" | javascript | "2022-05-05T15:08:28Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,479 | ["packages/next/build/swc/Cargo.lock"] | Module parse failed: The keyword 'yield' is reserved | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
NA
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
NA
### Describe the Bug
`npm run build` fails with the following error:
```
Module parse failed: The keyword 'yield' is reserved (453:107)
File was processed with these loaders:
* ./node_modules/next/dist/build/webpack/loaders/next-swc-loader.js
You may need an additional loader to handle the result of these loaders.
```
when looked closely at the code, there is an await call which is converted to as yield throwing an error.
Not sure why this is throwing as an error.
### Expected Behavior
Build should pass.
### To Reproduce
Write a function with async/await.
Run `npm run build`. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31479 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31540 | 055e28ef811e7c9e8365c591400c5aac467b1648 | 2df861ac1285460f18fcd590fe086b85a92f6805 | "2021-11-16T05:21:25Z" | javascript | "2021-11-17T16:51:00Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,474 | ["examples/cms-sanity/lib/queries.js"] | The cms-sanity example throws the following error: Query error: object or function expected. | ### What example does this report relate to?
cms-sanity
### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
17.1.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
With newer API versions, pipe operators at the end of some of the example's GROQ queries returns an error.
```
export const postQuery = `
{
"post": *[_type == "post" && slug.current == $slug] | order(_updatedAt desc) | [0] {
content,
${postFields}
},
"morePosts": *[_type == "post" && slug.current != $slug] | order(date desc, _updatedAt desc) | [0...2] {
content,
${postFields}
}
}`
```
-> Query error: object or function expected
### Expected Behavior
Running yarn dev after setting up the example should build the Next app without throwing an error.
[This issue thread](https://github.com/sanity-io/GROQ/issues/65#issue-901423589) on the [sanity.io/GROQ](https://github.com/sanity-io/GROQ) repo mentions the error. Sanity's developer [@atombender](https://github.com/atombender) confirms that this error is produced by breaking changes introduced to the GROQ query syntax in the v2021-03-25 API version of Sanity. He also confirms that the changes related to implicit pipe operators were forgotten to be reflected on the version's documentation or changelog.
To solve the issue, the [cms-sanity](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/cms-sanity) example's code should be updated by removing the implicit pipe operators between order and the square bracket notation from the following GROQ queries:
```
export const postQuery = `
{
"post": *[_type == "post" && slug.current == $slug] | order(_updatedAt desc) [0] {
content,
${postFields}
},
"morePosts": *[_type == "post" && slug.current != $slug] | order(date desc, _updatedAt desc) [0...2] {
content,
${postFields}
}
}`
```
### To Reproduce
Running the example as it is at the moment throws an error related to this piece of code located at the folder path */lib/queries
```
export const postQuery = `
{
"post": *[_type == "post" && slug.current == $slug] | order(_updatedAt desc) | [0] {
content,
${postFields}
},
"morePosts": *[_type == "post" && slug.current != $slug] | order(date desc, _updatedAt desc) | [0...2] {
content,
${postFields}
}
}`
```
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31474 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/32182 | cffd209a677db9c953c15e4fc8e168a278d3908c | 1fe014ce17d999864d474684eb70c1f2172ae9ea | "2021-11-16T03:30:03Z" | javascript | "2021-12-06T19:32:09Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,411 | ["packages/next/shared/lib/router/utils/prepare-destination.ts", "test/integration/route-index/test/index.test.js"] | Internal Server Error 500: `Invalid regular expression: /:\/: \ at end of pattern` | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.1
### What browser are you using?
Any
### What operating system are you using?
Any
### How are you deploying your application?
next start on Heroku
### Describe the Bug
We have an automatic security testing tool that runs on our production sites to check for common vulnerabilities. In the latest run we got a bunch of internal server errors of the type `Invalid regular expression: /:\/: \ at end of pattern` (with different patterns depending on the path visited).
Here are the paths that triggered the error:
```
/desktop/core/?.%5C
/desktop/core/?.%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/?%00
/desktop/core/?%22%27%60%2C%C3%9E~%C3%87%1FY%00
/desktop/core/?%40%5B
/desktop/core/?%5C
/desktop/core/?%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/?%5Cx%5C
/desktop/core/?%7C
/desktop/core/?bar%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/?baz%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/?file%3A%5C
/desktop/core/?foo%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/?hack%3A%5C
/desktop/core/?unix:|
/desktop/core/?uniz:|
/desktop/core/?X5O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/?Y4O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24STANDARD-EICAR-ANTIVIRUS-HACK-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/ext-py/?.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?.%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?%00
/desktop/core/ext-py/?%22%27%60%2C%C3%9E~%C3%87%1FY%00
/desktop/core/ext-py/?%40%5B
/desktop/core/ext-py/?%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?%5Cx%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?%7C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?bar%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?baz%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?file%3A%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?foo%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?hack%3A%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/?unix:|
/desktop/core/ext-py/?uniz:|
/desktop/core/ext-py/?X5O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/ext-py/?Y4O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24STANDARD-EICAR-ANTIVIRUS-HACK-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?.%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?%00
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?%22%27%60%2C%C3%9E~%C3%87%1FY%00
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?%40%5B
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?%5Cx%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?%7C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?bar%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?baz%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?file%3A%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?foo%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?hack%3A%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?unix:|
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?uniz:|
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?X5O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/?Y4O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24STANDARD-EICAR-ANTIVIRUS-HACK-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?.%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?%00
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?%22%27%60%2C%C3%9E~%C3%87%1FY%00
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?%40%5B
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?%5Cx%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?%7C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?bar%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?baz%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?file%3A%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?foo%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?hack%3A%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?unix:|
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?uniz:|
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?X5O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/?Y4O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24STANDARD-EICAR-ANTIVIRUS-HACK-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?.%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?%00
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?%22%27%60%2C%C3%9E~%C3%87%1FY%00
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?%40%5B
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?%5C.%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?%5Cx%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?%7C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?bar%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?baz%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?file%3A%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?foo%60%3C%25%22%27%7B%24%2A%25%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?hack%3A%5C
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?unix:|
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?uniz:|
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?X5O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
/desktop/core/ext-py/Paste-2.0.1/tests/cgiapp_data/?Y4O%21P%25%40AP%5B4%5CPZX54%28P%5E%297CC%297%7D%24STANDARD-EICAR-ANTIVIRUS-HACK-FILE%21%24H%2BH%2A
```
Here are some example error messages
```
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:.\.\/: \ at end of pattern
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:.\/: \ at end of pattern
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:@[/: Unterminated character class
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:\.\/: \ at end of pattern
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:\/: \ at end of pattern
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:\x\/: \ at end of pattern
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:bar`<%""'{$*%\/: Nothing to repeat"
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:baz`<%""'{$*%\/: Nothing to repeat"
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:file:\/: \ at end of pattern
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:foo`<%""'{$*%\/: Nothing to repeat"
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:hack:\/: \ at end of pattern
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*/: Range out of order in character class
SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /:Y4O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$STANDARD-EICAR-ANTIVIRUS-HACK-FILE!$H+H*/: Range out of order in character class
```
### Expected Behavior
The server should return 404.
### To Reproduce
* Generate a new next app with `create-next-app` (v12.0.3 was latest at the time of writing)
* Start the server with either `next dev` or `next build && next start`
* Visit any of the paths listed above
The server will throw an internal server error with a regex message. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31411 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31791 | d2cef24d5deae8bb27bf619b970e1aca4f069ec3 | 8784682a7497cda0e4131014dcb48c42c07ec5ad | "2021-11-15T09:01:22Z" | javascript | "2021-11-30T19:15:13Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,391 | ["packages/next/build/swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next/build/swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-31627/input.js", "packages/next/build/swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-31627/output.js"] | Can't retrieve data from Firestore when `swcMinify: true` | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Linux
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
I'm using Firebase version 9.4.1. I can't get the data by running a query to my Firebase Firestore. This only happens when in production and I enable `swcMinify` in the `next.config.js` file.
So, to **fix** it I just disable the `swcMinify` feature and everything is back to normal.
### Expected Behavior
Get data from my Firebase Firestore.
### To Reproduce
I took just one example that I got from the official Firebase(version 9) documentation to retrieve all data from collections: https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/query-data/get-data#get_all_documents_in_a_collection. Then I added a bit of how I implemented it:
```js
useEffect(() => {
getUser(auth.id, user => {
setUser(user)
})
}, [auth])
```
In the `next.config.js` file we enable the `swcMinify` feature.
```js
module.exports = {
swcMinify: true
// ....
}
```
Then, you can try running it in production with `next build` then `next start`. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31391 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31639 | f52211bad39c2a29a7caba40bfeb89b600524b41 | 3146ed37f83c0ccade1e2c475a04d82b681385ea | "2021-11-14T12:50:57Z" | javascript | "2021-11-20T19:25:52Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,383 | ["docs/api-reference/next/server.md"] | Missing cookie in NextResponse obj | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.x
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Window 11
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
Hi, I am trying to set cookie with NextResponse which shown in docs, but there is not an obj like that. Is this a future feature ?

### Expected Behavior
Set / remove cookie for NextResponse
### To Reproduce

| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31383 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31707 | 7be75bbf2ff3fbd7daaceb26c6d3318bd79839f8 | 2781b8eb87bab839960ee59f9f3baae4cec2c983 | "2021-11-14T07:06:37Z" | javascript | "2021-11-29T22:44:58Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,375 | [".eslintignore", "packages/next/build/jest/jest.ts", "packages/next/build/swc/jest-transformer.js", "packages/next/build/swc/options.js", "packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-swc-loader.js", "test/development/basic/legacy-decorators.test.ts", "test/development/basic/legacy-decorators/jsconfig.json", "test/development/basic/legacy-decorators/pages/index.js"] | Add support for legacy decorators when enabled in tsconfig/jsconfig | Unfortunately it seems that a group of apps is using legacy decorators in babelrc for integration with older mobx applications. We can add support for this through the `experimentalDecorators` flag in `tsconfig`/`jsconfig` as per @kdy1 that flag is the same as legacy decorators. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31375 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31376 | ae1cee59d600b23b6827bffefdcabd9c6605ccf7 | e0531e30f4ed12ae32cc0e5d1bdf92953faa7fac | "2021-11-13T15:07:25Z" | javascript | "2021-11-13T17:26:13Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,359 | ["packages/next/build/swc/options.js", "packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-swc-loader.js", "test/development/basic/theme-ui.test.ts", "test/development/basic/theme-ui/jsconfig.json", "test/development/basic/theme-ui/pages/_app.js", "test/development/basic/theme-ui/pages/index.js", "test/development/basic/theme-ui/theme.js"] | Add support for importSource | One of the items in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/30174#discussion-3643870 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31359 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31358 | 06f3d398b1fb728bcce8e11b848b5ad9370b490c | a4692d400d666194eb037c5a842f702e259ba1c5 | "2021-11-12T20:06:44Z" | javascript | "2021-11-12T20:51:43Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,337 | ["docs/api-reference/next/router.md"] | Document router.push returns a promise | ### Discussed in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/31278
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **TrueWill** November 11, 2021</sup>
I'm not quite sure where to post this - is it a bug? a feature? an issue with the docs?
I turned on the [no-floating-promises](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/master/packages/eslint-plugin/docs/rules/no-floating-promises.md) ESLint rule, and suddenly all of my `router.push` (and other router methods) were flagged. Per the typedefs it returns `Promise<boolean>` - but this isn't [documented](https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/router#routerpush). The examples ignore the returned promise.
Is there a reason for this behavior?</div> | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31337 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31341 | 6ffa2baa4d0392cddc462eb3788b8c9befb42546 | f176683806acda157277e27ca861e1dff62e04df | "2021-11-12T09:22:43Z" | javascript | "2021-12-19T23:07:11Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 33,538 | ["packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-flight-client-loader.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/plugins/flight-manifest-plugin.ts", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/components/named.client.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/pages/index.server.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/rsc.js"] | Named exports of components are not supported | It is not possible to use named imports/exports for components, i.e. this works:
```tsx
export default function Page() {
...
}
```
and this doesn't work
```tsx
export function Page() {
...
}
```
resulting in the following error:
```
error - unhandledRejection: SyntaxError: Unexpected token u in JSON at position 0
```
Here's a minimal code to reproduce:
https://github.com/vercel/next-rsc-demo/compare/main...zaiste:named-imports-for-components | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33538 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/34974 | 1b17070a2972646a94de9f652510066c94c6c7c3 | 1f1632979c78b3edfe59fd85d8cce62efcdee688 | "2021-11-11T20:45:10Z" | javascript | "2022-03-02T20:57:50Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,291 | ["packages/next/build/swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next/build/swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-31627/input.js", "packages/next/build/swc/crates/core/tests/loader/issue-31627/output.js"] | Optimisations no longer applied to `_buildManifest.js` when using SWC | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4-canary.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
Vercel
### Describe the Bug
After enabling SWC I noticed that `buildManfest.json`'s output grew significantly (20kb⇢80kb) because it is no longer using optimisations for chunk names, e.g: `self.__BUILD_MANIFEST=function(e,s,a,t,c,o,n,i,r,g,l,b,d,u,p,f,h,m,k)`
```
// With SWC off:
ls -lh .next/static/JdI1kHMMIQ4b_kwr2NZiG/_buildManifest.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 benschwarz staff 26K 11 Nov 18:58 .next/static/JdI1kHMMIQ4b_kwr2NZiG/_buildManifest.js
// With SWC on:
ls -lh .next/static/dtDJS-Od0qktpqIrQBB_S/_buildManifest.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 benschwarz staff 80K 11 Nov 18:51 .next/static/dtDJS-Od0qktpqIrQBB_S/_buildManifest.js
```
Over the wire (with Gzip compression) the file size difference isn't anywhere near as dramatic (Repeated strings are of course optimised by Gzip, so they both end up around 6kb), **but** there may be an impact to JS parse & compile times, which could compromise main thread performance for sites with many pages.
### Expected Behavior
Optimisations should be applied to `_buildManifest.js` to avoid a potential perf regression.
### To Reproduce
* Run `rm -rf .next`
* Run `next build`
* Observe size of `.next/static/<generatedHash>/_buildManifest.js` (small)
* Run `rm -rf .next`
* Turn on SWC using `swcMinify: true` in `next.config.json`
* Run `next build`
* Observe size of `.next/static/<generatedHash>/_buildManifest.js` (large) | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31291 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31639 | f52211bad39c2a29a7caba40bfeb89b600524b41 | 3146ed37f83c0ccade1e2c475a04d82b681385ea | "2021-11-11T08:07:12Z" | javascript | "2021-11-20T19:25:52Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,286 | ["examples/auth0/pages/advanced/ssr-profile.js"] | Auth0 API Call Incorrect in Example | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
canary
### What version of Node.js are you using?
15.10.0
### What browser are you using?
Firefox
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
`npm run dev`
### Describe the Bug
API signature mismatch between the example code and the Auth0 library. Required parameter (`res`) missing. Fix opened in #31284.
### Expected Behavior
Profile page should load!
### To Reproduce
Run the [Auth0 example](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/auth0) without the fix in PR #31284 and navigate to the server-rendered profile. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31286 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31284 | ae1d271f9ab77c63036d4901155a089d13392ea2 | 5014362a7a6359fac8fc1bb8a02eae6736805d7f | "2021-11-11T02:40:54Z" | javascript | "2021-11-11T03:16:31Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,275 | ["packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "test/e2e/next-script/index.test.ts"] | Unable to use `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` and `beforeInteractive` strategy in Script component | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
14.17.1
### What version of Node.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
npm run dev
### Describe the Bug
Setting `dangerouslySetInnerHtml` in next Script component while also specifying `beforeInteractive` strategy will result in the Script component doing nothing. Since there is no `src` specified, the src will simply be `(unknown)`.

```
<Script
id="test"
strategy="beforeInteractive"
dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{
// will not run
__html: `console.log('hello!')`,
}}
/>
```
### Expected Behavior
Script component can be used with no `src` while using `dangerouslySetInnerHtml` property.
### To Reproduce
Try to render Script component using `beforeInteractive` while having no `url` and specifying `dangerouslySetInnerHtml` property.
```
<Script
id="test"
strategy="beforeInteractive"
dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{
// will not run
__html: `console.log('hello!')`,
}}
/>
```
This piece of code of next Script will result in the following script tag being added

| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31275 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37000 | b2045c7669982edbb7002c7f88f8e7665a2168f7 | 81e69e8662e5d4010b1ca726092479f777b0e4d7 | "2021-11-10T22:56:17Z" | javascript | "2022-05-18T18:36:11Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,254 | ["package.json", "packages/next/server/image-optimizer.ts", "packages/next/server/lib/squoosh/impl.ts", "packages/next/server/lib/squoosh/main.ts", "test/integration/image-optimizer/app/public/mountains.jpg", "test/integration/image-optimizer/test/index.test.js", "yarn.lock"] | New avif image larger than webp | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
v16.4.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Mac (local dev environment)
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
The new avif image format was introduced with "enabling 20% smaller images compared to WebP.".
Unfortunately, my local tests show me the opposite.
**Example result:**
Avif: 96,4kb
<img width="959" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2021-11-10 um 16 06 41" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6911678/141142280-d21aff51-57fa-4073-bf5f-1bacfd1dff14.png">
Webp: 82,6kb
<img width="953" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2021-11-10 um 16 06 17" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6911678/141142216-9f168bf3-b1ed-4463-b03b-695610225b6a.png">
I know the efficiency of image compression algorithms depends on the image, that's why I tested this with multiple images. But I always had a similar result.
### Expected Behavior
The Avif Image should not be larger than the webp image.
### To Reproduce
### Short Version:
I created a example project to show this problem:
https://github.com/derweili/next-image-compression-test
1. Clone this repo: https://github.com/derweili/next-image-compression-test
2. Run `npm run build && npm run start`
3. Load the page in the Browser and check the image size via the dev tools (network tab)
4. Comment out line 7 of the next.config.js file
https://github.com/derweili/next-image-compression-test/blob/79c14ce248db4b9b00740ffd8307b98a327e4a50/next.config.js#L7
5. Run `npm run build && npm run start` again
6. Load the page in the Browser and check the image size via the dev tools (network tab)
7. Compare both image sizes
### Manual version:
1. Create a new nextjs project using create-next-app
2. Add a random photo
3. Run `npm run build && npm run start`
4. Load the page in the Browser and check the image size via the dev tools (network tab)
5. Add avif support as described here: https://nextjs.org/blog/next-12#smaller-images-using-avif
6. Run `npm run build && npm run start` again
7. Load the page in the Browser and check the image size via the dev tools (network tab)
8. Compare both image sizes
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31254 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31494 | 0cf7061859c1a00979247a552423a1812f8e1081 | 44b4dbcd419b592bea354161a309e0f74dfa67d1 | "2021-11-10T15:31:23Z" | javascript | "2021-11-17T20:31:16Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,250 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/next_ssg.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/page_config.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/src/shake_exports.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/full/auto-cjs/1/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/core/tests/full/example/output.js", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/Cargo.toml", "packages/next-swc/crates/napi/src/bundle/mod.rs", "packages/next-swc/crates/wasm/Cargo.toml"] | Error `Objects are not valid as a React child (found: object with keys...` with `swcMinify: true` | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
v12.0.3 and v12.0.4-canary.4
### What version of Node.js are you using?
v16.3.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next build && next start
### Describe the Bug
#### With **`swcMinify: false`** in `next.config.js`:
When running `next build && next start` or `next dev` , after opening `http://localhost:3000/` in the browser, everything works fine and is rendered correctly, there are no errors in the console.
#### With **`swcMinify: true`** in `next.config.js`:
- After running `next dev` and opening `http://localhost:3000/` in the browser everything is still working fine
- However running `next build && next start`, after opening `http://localhost:3000/` in the browser instead of the rendered page you see: `Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the browser console for more information).`, with the [following error in the console](https://gist.github.com/martinfrancois/d8d59f5c11acea980b997cb696f1d3c6). When decoded, it results in the following errors:
```
Objects are not valid as a React child (found: object with keys {Qr, RV, cI, Gc}). If you meant to render a collection of children, use an array instead.
Objects are not valid as a React child (found: object with keys {passive}). If you meant to render a collection of children, use an array instead.
```
### Expected Behavior
Having **`swcMinify: true`** in `next.config.js` should result in the same page being rendered after running `next build && next start` as when having **`swcMinify: false`** in `next.config.js` and should be rendered without any errors.
### To Reproduce
1. Clone https://github.com/martinfrancois/swc-minification-repro
2. `npm ci`
3. `npm run build`
4. `npm start`
5. Open http://localhost:3000/ in your browser. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31250 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33063 | 320986a2b897bc512c21f7148f4a4c8ce749dcae | 87dbd03eb0ca738fbf669e1f03826af6e59b9b27 | "2021-11-10T14:01:29Z" | javascript | "2022-01-10T10:37:32Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,241 | ["packages/next/cli/next-telemetry.ts", "packages/next/telemetry/storage.ts"] | Make `npx next telemetry disable` output where the preference setting was saved to | ### Describe the feature you'd like to request
For this message:
```
$ npx next telemetry disable
Your preference has been saved.
Status: Disabled
You have opted-out of Next.js' anonymous telemetry program.
No data will be collected from your machine.
Learn more: https://nextjs.org/telemetry
```
I find it unsettling to see there were no changes in my git repo.
### Describe the solution you'd like
Instead of `Your preference has been saved.` it would be lovely to see it say something like `Your preference has been saved to /home/user/somethingsomething`
### Describe alternatives you've considered
Using [sysinternals](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/filemon) | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31241 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31305 | fbe366f4656a29f8ef03b7ee66c38ab9f642d665 | c4558c913f4f2ce95fccae92a182127a0a451954 | "2021-11-10T11:21:49Z" | javascript | "2021-11-11T16:48:00Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,228 | ["packages/next/server/router.ts", "test/integration/i18n-support/test/index.test.js"] | i18n configuration. The pathname can contain 2 different locales and it works (f.e. /en/de/). | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.17.5
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Windows
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
When I use [i18n configuration](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/i18n-routing) I can see page in 3 difference urls.
For example, if I have page `/cards/` - it will be available at:
1. `/cards/` (_that's ok, we expect it_)
2. `/en/cards/` (_that's ok too_)
3. `/en/de/cards/` (_what?_)
(_In the last case language will be `/de/`_)
### Expected Behavior
The page should be available only at:
1. `/cards/` (_that's ok, we expect it_)
2. `/en/cards/` (_that's ok too_)
Not at `/en/de/cards/`. On this page I am expecting a 404 error
### To Reproduce
Enable i18n in some project.
Here a good example with this error: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/i18n-routing
The main page will be available at ` `, `/en`, `/en/nl`;
`gsp` - at `/gsp`, `/en/gsp`, `/en/fr/gsp`;
etc
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31228 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31229 | c791da09779e5ec005fd3b01a46872676817db18 | ae1d271f9ab77c63036d4901155a089d13392ea2 | "2021-11-09T22:28:19Z" | javascript | "2021-11-11T02:29:20Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,196 | ["packages/next/server/web/spec-extension/response.ts", "test/unit/web-runtime/next-response.test.ts"] | NextResponse: Auto detect JSON payload | ### Describe the feature you'd like to request
Allow for `NextResponse` to add Content-Type and body stringify automatically when input is JSON.
### Describe the solution you'd like
Instead of
```js
new Response(JSON.stringify({ message: 'hi' }), {
headers: {
'content-type': 'application/json'
}
})
```
The interface could be:
```js
new NextResponse({ message: 'hi' })
```
### Describe alternatives you've considered
Maybe checking the payloads could be too hard, consider `NextResponse.json()` could be a better approach. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31196 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31483 | af82de42741341daf2561a297dbbd54e4f3f8e8a | 593d943cd05c388133879750b2197926601a43e0 | "2021-11-09T10:44:55Z" | javascript | "2021-11-16T18:38:47Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,179 | ["packages/next/server/next-server.ts", "test/integration/middleware/core/test/index.test.js"] | next/server proxies middleware rewrites if not served from localhost | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.4-canary.0
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.11.0
### What browser are you using?
Firefox
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
When returning `NextResponse.rewrite` from middleware, next/server determines whether to proxy the request by checking if the parsed rewrite URL has a protocol. When running on localhost this will be false, so it will handle the rewrite as expected. However if running with a hostname, such as if using `mycomputername.local:3000`, using any other value for localhost (such as `127.0.0.1`), or running a live server, then the parsed URL will have a protocol, so the server will attempt to proxy to the address. This will result in either an ssl error or a proxy loop.
I am happy to submit a PR to fix this. It can be fixed by also checking if the rewrite host matches the request host.
### Expected Behavior
Server does not attempt to proxy local rewrites, even when running with a hostname.
### To Reproduce
- Clone [the geolocation demo](https://github.com/vercel/examples/tree/main/edge-functions/geolocation)
- Run locally
- Load using your computer's hostname, or `localtest.me` (which resolves to localhost)
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31179 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31180 | d1adf1d5039fa3cba78409509f80b3958b60eeaa | 9952cc79dbbfe81723cba0c0e6ba2250c3921964 | "2021-11-08T21:58:39Z" | javascript | "2021-11-13T00:20:13Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,149 | ["packages/next/lib/typescript/writeConfigurationDefaults.ts"] | False Requirement: isolatedModules is set to true for babel when not using babel | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.9.4
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
Ubuntu
### How are you deploying your application?
vercel
### Describe the Bug
A dependency does not have isolatedModules and thus breaks `next build`. We are not using babel anymore in favor of swc.
`The following mandatory changes were made to your tsconfig.json:`
`- isolatedModules was set to true (requirement for babel)`
Then the build fails because of no isolated modules
### Expected Behavior
Allow isolatedModules or enhance error message
### To Reproduce
Set `isolatedModules` in `tsconfig.json` to `true` and run `next build`. | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31149 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31150 | 283af4e69bd86e108ae712cbf6921e3f143b40f1 | 9d7900c209329682308cc1a6093f297deae43662 | "2021-11-08T13:46:05Z" | javascript | "2021-11-08T19:16:34Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,139 | ["packages/next/client/dev/error-overlay/websocket.ts"] | Next v12 upgrade: WebSocket connection to 'wss://localhost:3000/_next/webpack-hmr' failed: for https connections | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.17.6
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### Describe the Bug
Post v12.0.3 migration, when I try to run the application locally via https URL, `https://dev.abcd.com:443`; it throws the error `WebSocket connection to 'wss://localhost:3000/_next/webpack-hmr' failed`.
`http://localhost:3000` was set as assertPrefix.
However, It works fine when I try to use http URL, `http://dev.abcd.com:3000`
____________________
After digging a bit I found that, the cause was that the websocket connections for `ws://localhost:3000/_next/webpack-hmr` worked well, but `wss://localhost:443/_next/webpack-hmr` failed. I can't figure out why secure connections are failing
#30491 did not help as I'm neither using nginx, nor a custom express server.
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31139 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31213 | 489ca73e436c54408b8769437d5fd51bb336d6f4 | e3135ccde61c8bed2398962c1a24548a1f774757 | "2021-11-08T11:29:24Z" | javascript | "2021-11-09T21:26:55Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,104 | ["packages/next/build/entries.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack-config.ts", "packages/next/pages/_document-web.tsx", "packages/next/taskfile.js"] | [Expo] [WebDocument] TypeError: Cannot call a class as a function | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
16.7.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
N/A
### Describe the Bug
After updating to 12.0.3 from 12.0.2, I'm now getting a build error:
```
Warning: React.createElement: type is invalid -- expected a string (for built-in components) or a class/function (for composite components) but got: undefined. You likely forgot to export your component from the file it's defined in, or you might have mixed up default and named imports.
TypeError: Cannot call a class as a function
at _classCallCheck (webpack-internal:///./node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/classCallCheck.js:3:11)
at WebDocument (webpack-internal:///./pages/_document.tsx:90:85)
at processChild (/myproject/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.development.js:3353:14)
at resolve (/myproject/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.development.js:3270:5)
at ReactDOMServerRenderer.render (/myproject/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.development.js:3753:22)
at ReactDOMServerRenderer.read (/myproject/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.development.js:3690:29)
at Object.renderToStaticMarkup (/myproject/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.development.js:4314:27)
at Object.renderToHTML (/myproject/node_modules/next/dist/server/render.js:739:41)
at async doRender (/myproject/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js:1389:38)
at async /myproject/node_modules/next/dist/server/next-server.js:1484:28
```
### Expected Behavior
This was working correctly in 12.0.2. If I had to guess I think the culprit is the new `_document.web.tsx` file that was added in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/30963/files#diff-19e859eeb1baeee864c9a093b1eda99c402b707ac813857330747f42cdfbb979 (cc @huozhi) that's being picked up instead of `_document.tsx` by RNW/Expo projects.
### To Reproduce
One way to reproduce is to add Expo to a Next.js project https://docs.expo.dev/guides/using-nextjs/#add-expo-to-nextjs-projects
This is my `pages/_document.tsx`
```tsx
import { Document, getInitialProps } from '@expo/next-adapter/document'
import React from 'react'
import { flush } from 'react-native-media-query'
export default class WebDocument extends Document {
static getInitialProps: typeof getInitialProps = async ({ renderPage }) => {
const initialProps = await getInitialProps({ renderPage })
const styles = [initialProps.styles, flush()]
return { ...initialProps, styles: React.Children.toArray(styles) }
}
}
``` | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31104 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31116 | ad981783abbb347b6510c4dee5ce969e87ab0e24 | cfb8cc841e6c7b80e809565cddfc4219d695c282 | "2021-11-07T04:18:20Z" | javascript | "2021-11-07T22:14:50Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,077 | ["packages/next-swc/Cargo.lock"] | swc broken on nextjs 12.0.3 with @toast-ui/react-editor | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.3
### What version of Node.js are you using?
v16.13.0
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
next build
### Describe the Bug
when i add `@toast-ui/react-editor` to my project
i change i config `swcMinify: true,`
then i run `next build`
i got a error:
```
yarn run v1.22.17
$ next build
warn - SWC minify beta enabled. https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/swc-minify-enabled
info - Checking validity of types
info - Creating an optimized production build .thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'Infinite loop detected (current pass = 101)', /Users/runner/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/swc_ecma_minifier-0.48.4/src/compress/mod.rs:261:13
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
fatal runtime error: failed to initiate panic, error 5
error Command failed with signal "SIGABRT".
info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.
```
### Expected Behavior
no error
### To Reproduce
1. clone https://github.com/find456789/tmp_nextjs12_swc
2. `yarn` or `npm i`
3. `yarn build` or `npm run build`
you will got the error | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31077 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/33461 | e5dee17f776dcc79ebb269f7b7341fa6e2b6c3f1 | 3574b91b48fabc20ba007953dbf3d6b52cfa37a1 | "2021-11-06T09:35:47Z" | javascript | "2022-01-19T15:57:39Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,013 | ["packages/next/shared/lib/router/router.ts", "test/integration/middleware/with-base-path/pages/_middleware.js", "test/integration/middleware/with-base-path/pages/index.js", "test/integration/middleware/with-base-path/test/index.test.js"] | HEAD prefetch requests caused by middleware do not respect basePath | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.2
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOs
### How are you deploying your application?
next start
### Describe the Bug
When having a basePath in next-config and some middleware then next.js fires HEAD request for link prefetching.
These HEAD request do not respect basePath.
### Expected Behavior
HEAD request respects basePath.
### To Reproduce
repository to reproduce:
https://github.com/alfrescian/next-middleware-base-path-issue
next-config:`module.exports = {
basePath: "/my-base"
};`
You'll notice HEAD request go to http://localhost:3000/blend9709 instead of expected http://localhost:3000/my-base/blend9709 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31013 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31101 | 3e8b2dcb6c64b4031ae7dbee813a295a064191b9 | 764e29c170ce2c1c779329d3ab16a15caa00081a | "2021-11-05T09:40:02Z" | javascript | "2021-11-09T19:03:05Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 31,012 | ["packages/next/build/output/index.ts", "test/integration/amphtml/pages/invalid-amp.js", "test/integration/amphtml/test/index.test.js"] | AMP Validator error logs are shown vertically | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.2
### What version of Node.js are you using?
v14.16.0
### What browser are you using?
Chorme
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
local development
### Describe the Bug
AMP Validator error logs are shown vertically.

It might be caused by this PR.
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/29753/files
### Expected Behavior
I expected to show the correctly formatted logs.

### To Reproduce
run `/examples/amp-first`.
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/amp-first
| https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31012 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31018 | e9e8e8b423c9c59f1a54db35d282ff20c825a949 | 4c05de3c7e1a6c920e5f8d5f1e740e7b48e1321a | "2021-11-05T09:09:52Z" | javascript | "2021-11-26T15:13:09Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 30,989 | ["packages/next/build/entries.ts", "packages/next/build/webpack/loaders/next-middleware-ssr-loader/index.ts", "packages/next/server/dev/hot-reloader.ts", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/pages/err.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/pages/err/render.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/app/pages/err/suspense.js", "test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js"] | Error routes (404, 500) in React Server Components | ### Describe the feature you'd like to request
Support for these features, with correct status codes.
https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/custom-error-page
### Describe the solution you'd like
TBD
### Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30989 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31164 | eb0bd63af48ea9bec85670ad1bcbc455c5f879ec | ef5795327a99ec8a3dfbe0b40fc1fdde3cdc58fb | "2021-11-04T21:21:30Z" | javascript | "2021-11-15T17:49:50Z" |
closed | vercel/next.js | https://github.com/vercel/next.js | 30,962 | ["docs/api-reference/next/script.md", "docs/basic-features/script.md", "packages/next/client/script.tsx", "test/integration/script-loader/base/pages/page8.js", "test/integration/script-loader/base/pages/page9.js", "test/integration/script-loader/test/index.test.js"] | next/script onLoad run once per cache Key (id, src) | ### What version of Next.js are you using?
12.0.2
### What version of Node.js are you using?
14.18.1
### What browser are you using?
Chrome
### What operating system are you using?
macOS
### How are you deploying your application?
codesandbox
### Describe the Bug
When using more than one `Script` with same `id` or `src`, only first script that complete load trigger the `onLoad` prop.
Same problem happens using one `Script` but after unmount and remount, for example when navigating throughout client-side router the `onLoad` will not be called.
@giorgiabosello
### Expected Behavior
`Script` component should load once the src script but run `onLoad` on component did mount and script is loaded.
### To Reproduce
https://codesandbox.io/s/nextjs-script-onload-ltm95 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30962 | https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38849 | 85b00b2ccae5629d3561b0c85579c9455693244c | a8186065b8eb30ef73d82075dbeb2a6fd94c2eaa | "2021-11-04T15:30:19Z" | javascript | "2022-07-28T20:42:52Z" |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.