status
stringclasses 1
value | repo_name
stringclasses 13
values | repo_url
stringclasses 13
values | issue_id
int64 1
104k
| updated_files
stringlengths 11
1.76k
| title
stringlengths 4
369
| body
stringlengths 0
254k
⌀ | issue_url
stringlengths 38
55
| pull_url
stringlengths 38
53
| before_fix_sha
stringlengths 40
40
| after_fix_sha
stringlengths 40
40
| report_datetime
unknown | language
stringclasses 5
values | commit_datetime
unknown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 87,048 | ["docs/changelog/87076.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/DataStream.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/Metadata.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/MetadataIndexTemplateService.java", "x-pack/plugin/ccr/build.gradle", "x-pack/plugin/ccr/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ccr/AutoFollowIT.java", "x-pack/plugin/ccr/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ccr/action/TransportPutFollowAction.java", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/ReplaceDataStreamBackingIndexStepTests.java"] | CCR AutoFollowCoordinator can trigger put-follow actions that can corrupt datastreams in an edge case | A transport put follow-action can be triggered for an index that is part of a data stream and already exists.
Normally this is not an issue because the restore operation will just fail because the index already exists.
If however, the index is currently closed (for example due to ILM doing a force-merge with codec change step on the index),
this causes the currently closed index to be restored into. As a result we run into a bug in the following code in
`org.elasticsearch.xpack.ccr.action.TransportPutFollowAction#createFollowerIndex`:
```java
BiConsumer<ClusterState, Metadata.Builder> updater = (currentState, mdBuilder) -> {
DataStream localDataStream = currentState.getMetadata().dataStreams().get(remoteDataStream.getName());
Index followerIndex = mdBuilder.get(followerIndexName).getIndex();
assert followerIndex != null;
DataStream updatedDataStream = updateLocalDataStream(followerIndex, localDataStream, remoteDataStream);
mdBuilder.put(updatedDataStream);
};
restoreService.restoreSnapshot(restoreRequest, delegatelistener, updater);
}
```
This code updates the local data stream when following an index without checking if that index already is part of the data stream, thus now creating two entries for the same `Index` in the data stream's indices list. Code like `org.elasticsearch.cluster.metadata.DataStream#removeBackingIndex` however assumes no duplicates and will when deleting an index, only remove it from the data stream once. Thus leaving a dangling `Index` instance that does not point to any existing index any more, corrupting the cluster state.
cc @martijnvg thanks for the help with reasoning this out | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/87048 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87076 | ecd2c1b6554977680a7c0ebf2a6829bad36650fb | 248918f142b870b18fd5168a3210947e6550d3df | "2022-05-23T14:05:51Z" | java | "2022-05-24T13:45:00Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 87,036 | ["docs/changelog/87123.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/mapper/DocumentParser.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/index/mapper/CopyToMapperTests.java"] | bad indexing performance in elasticsearch 8.2.0 | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.2.0
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
docker-image = docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch/elasticsearch:8.2.0
### Problem Description
We are trying to migrate from Elasticsearch 6.7.1 to Elasticsearch 8.2.0.
With the same amount of documents per bulk request (100 docs per request), we always get a socket timeout in Elasticsearch 8.2.0. Everything works fine in Elasticsearch 6.7.1.
I noticed that indexing the same document in Elasticsearch 8.2.0 takes 44152ms. In Elasticsearch 6.7.1, indexing takes 50ms.
### Steps to Reproduce
[elasticsearch_8.2.0.txt](https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/files/8754299/elasticsearch_8.2.0.txt)
[elasticsearch_6.7.1.txt](https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/files/8754300/elasticsearch_6.7.1.txt)
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/87036 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87123 | 4640c03294bd2d20c1f1fd015040e44c70e67698 | 4e1f72552cda4b3335c46c34af98150228ee5f7d | "2022-05-23T12:00:42Z" | java | "2022-06-08T13:02:25Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 87,034 | ["docs/reference/analysis/tokenfilters/stop-tokenfilter.asciidoc"] | [Doc issue] Fix broken link of Lucene’s StopFilter in Elasticsearch Stop token filter | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.2
### Installed Plugins
None
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
NA
### Problem Description
[Stop token filter](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/analysis-stop-tokenfilter.html) has a mention of Lucene stop filter. but clicking on that link doesn't work, and shows 404. Below screenshot shows the link that doesn't work.
### Steps to Reproduce
Explained in Problem Description.
### Logs (if relevant)
NA | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/87034 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87037 | 862d72fefc57a4e5559b8ca6c7fadc5a63366d77 | c3a61901732e3233cf4793b19882c279e13769d6 | "2022-05-23T11:46:28Z" | java | "2022-05-23T18:06:35Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 87,026 | ["modules/legacy-geo/build.gradle", "server/build.gradle", "server/src/main/java/module-info.java", "x-pack/plugin/spatial/build.gradle", "x-pack/plugin/spatial/licenses/lucene-LICENSE.txt", "x-pack/plugin/spatial/licenses/lucene-NOTICE.txt", "x-pack/plugin/spatial/licenses/lucene-spatial3d-9.2.0.jar.sha1"] | Rework lucene spatial3d dependency on server | The server module has a dependency on lucene spatial3d library but it is never used. The only dependency on that library happens in the spatial module which is accessed via the server module at the moment. There might be a better way to handle this dependency so opening this issue to track it. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/87026 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87397 | b3ff079794315494e5d4bd36104c3a41843a9028 | f5c0be5c89009dd8afdbdabf0ca0c55eecdc5557 | "2022-05-23T09:44:23Z" | java | "2022-06-07T19:54:11Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 87,003 | ["docs/changelog/87011.yaml", "qa/smoke-test-http/src/javaRestTest/java/org/elasticsearch/http/PointInTimeIT.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/action/search/OpenPointInTimeRequest.java"] | Creating a PIT without `?keep_alive` parameter returns 500 rather than 4xx | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.2.0
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Cloud
### Problem Description
Creating a PIT without the required `?keep_alive` parameter throws a NPE which maps to HTTP status code `500 Internal Server Error` whereas really this isn't a server-side error, it's a bad request, so the status code should be something like `400 Bad Request`
### Steps to Reproduce
```
# Request:
POST /_pit
# Response:
# 500 Internal Server Error
# {
# "status": 500,
# "error": {
# "reason": "[keep_alive] parameter must be non null",
# "root_cause": [
# {
# "reason": "[keep_alive] parameter must be non null",
# "type": "null_pointer_exception"
# }
# ],
# "type": "null_pointer_exception"
# }
# }
```
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/87003 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87011 | bfdade4b9a3cf112d04d0255980df498c832010d | dea11179d2de76db807ad01e5b349d96a055345b | "2022-05-20T19:21:17Z" | java | "2022-05-31T00:54:44Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,977 | ["docs/changelog/87052.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/security/authz/privilege/IndexPrivilege.java", "x-pack/plugin/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/security/authz/60_resolve_index.yml"] | Permissions issue for the resolve_index api | ### Elasticsearch Version
latest
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
18.0.1.1
### OS Version
Linux 5.17.6-1-MANJARO
### Problem Description
We created a `hasData` service which utilizes the `resolve_index` api to check whether ES data exists. When making a call to `internal/index-pattern-management/resolve_index` to query whether data exists or not, in certain scenarios it fails with a 500 Internal Server Error.
The ES error being -
> security_exception: [security_exception] Reason: action [indices:admin/resolve/index] is unauthorized for user [test_user] with roles [test_dashboard_user,reporting_user], this
action is granted by the index privileges [view_index_metadata,manage,all]
The scenarios being:
Scenario one:
1. There are 3 indices
2. User has `read` access to 1 of the indices, but not to the other two
3. The call fails with a 500 Internal Server Error. The user should be able to see the index they have access to.
Scenario two:
1. This refers to a scenario where the user has `read` access to the index, but `no view_index_metadata` privileges.
Original issue ticket in Kibana for reference - [#132478](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/132478)
### Steps to Reproduce
The user has `read` access to the index, but `no view_index_metadata` privileges.
The api fails with a 500 due to the missing permissions.
### Logs (if relevant)
security_exception: [security_exception] Reason: action [indices:admin/resolve/index] is unauthorized for user [test_user] with roles [test_dashboard_user,reporting_user], this
action is granted by the index privileges [view_index_metadata,manage,all] | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86977 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87052 | cf92a16a103095105b5d1a5c403b8de8aab0e32e | 58d86b6a435ba62e584f8137ecfaed6b0abb2e25 | "2022-05-20T14:25:49Z" | java | "2022-05-26T14:24:28Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,875 | ["CHANGELOG.md", "docs/changelog/88972.yaml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/field_caps/10_basic.yml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/rest/action/RestFieldCapabilitiesAction.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/action/fieldcaps/FieldCapabilitiesRequestTests.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/rest/action/RestFieldCapabilitiesActionTests.java"] | Support fields under body as well as in url for field_caps API. | ### Description
Before ES 7.x it was possible to provide a list of fields by URL or BODY request for field_caps API.
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/6.8/search-field-caps.html
`POST _field_caps
{
"fields" : ["rating"]
}`
Starting from 7.x this feature was removed, and only one possible way it uses URI but in this case, it is possible to have an error 414 (Request-URI Too Long).
I would like to return this feature back. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86875 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/88972 | b81f4187abe788f405be74cb95126066404f8fb4 | f28f4545b24e7912a8623f5f3da9147f28e7d7ad | "2022-05-18T01:57:58Z" | java | "2022-08-04T17:44:50Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,813 | ["x-pack/plugin/searchable-snapshots/qa/azure/src/javaRestTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/searchablesnapshots/AzureSearchableSnapshotsIT.java"] | [CI] AzureSearchableSnapshotsIT testSnapshotOfSearchableSnapshot failing | This smells like the snapshot not being removed between tests.
**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/ouan3uzvpq7y6/tests/:x-pack:plugin:searchable-snapshots:qa:azure:integTest/org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.AzureSearchableSnapshotsIT/testSnapshotOfSearchableSnapshot
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:searchable-snapshots:qa:azure:integTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.AzureSearchableSnapshotsIT.testSnapshotOfSearchableSnapshot" -Dtests.seed=4601A547785914AA -Dtests.locale=th-TH-u-nu-thai-x-lvariant-TH -Dtests.timezone=GMT0 -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
8.2
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.AzureSearchableSnapshotsIT&tests.test=testSnapshotOfSearchableSnapshot
**Failure excerpt:**
```
org.elasticsearch.client.ResponseException: method [PUT], host [http://127.0.0.1:45399], URI [_snapshot/repository/searchable-snapshot?wait_for_completion=true], status line [HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request]
{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"snapshot_name_already_in_use_exception","reason":"[repository:searchable-snapshot] Invalid snapshot name [searchable-snapshot], snapshot with the same name is already in-progress"}],"type":"snapshot_name_already_in_use_exception","reason":"[repository:searchable-snapshot] Invalid snapshot name [searchable-snapshot], snapshot with the same name is already in-progress"},"status":400}
at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient.convertResponse(RestClient.java:346)
at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient.performRequest(RestClient.java:312)
at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient.performRequest(RestClient.java:302)
at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient.performRequest(RestClient.java:287)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ESRestTestCase.createSnapshot(ESRestTestCase.java:1683)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ESRestTestCase.createSnapshot(ESRestTestCase.java:1675)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.AbstractSearchableSnapshotsRestTestCase.runSearchableSnapshotsTest(AbstractSearchableSnapshotsRestTestCase.java:207)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.AbstractSearchableSnapshotsRestTestCase.runSearchableSnapshotsTest(AbstractSearchableSnapshotsRestTestCase.java:86)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.AbstractSearchableSnapshotsRestTestCase.runSearchableSnapshotsTest(AbstractSearchableSnapshotsRestTestCase.java:82)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.AbstractSearchableSnapshotsRestTestCase.testSnapshotOfSearchableSnapshot(AbstractSearchableSnapshotsRestTestCase.java:353)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:-2)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86813 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87855 | 9ff9026871e27310c307020abb1c3fef0d4fc880 | 510c85a2099d3f7720cea62a240470c803845246 | "2022-05-16T17:56:35Z" | java | "2022-06-21T09:54:25Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,804 | ["modules/reindex/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/reindex/100_tsdb.yml"] | [CI] ReindexClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=reindex/100_tsdb/from tsdb to tsdb created by template while modifying dimension} failing | Fails with this specific test seed, but not with others. It looks like the relevant randomization has to do with `ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase` line 441 or so., where we add a global template depending on whether we are using the default number of shards.
**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/kfipuq66qzp44/tests/:modules:reindex:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.index.reindex.ReindexClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=reindex%2F100_tsdb%2Ffrom%20tsdb%20to%20tsdb%20created%20by%20template%20while%20modifying%20dimension%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':modules:reindex:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.index.reindex.ReindexClientYamlTestSuiteIT.test {yaml=reindex/100_tsdb/from tsdb to tsdb created by template while modifying dimension}" -Dtests.seed=B384201DDC198C9D -Dtests.locale=ko-KR -Dtests.timezone=GB-Eire -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
Yes
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.index.reindex.ReindexClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dreindex/100_tsdb/from%20tsdb%20to%20tsdb%20created%20by%20template%20while%20modifying%20dimension%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [reindex/100_tsdb:444]: got unexpected warning header [
299 Elasticsearch-8.3.0-SNAPSHOT-c17ab3643e2b2d3125d025e1865dc9f1e67806a6 "index template [test-composable-1] has index patterns [tsdb_templated_*] matching patterns from existing older templates [global] with patterns (global => [*]); this template [test-composable-1] will take precedence during new index creation"
]
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([B384201DDC198C9D:3BD01FC772E5E165]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:503)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:472)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:-2)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: got unexpected warning header [
299 Elasticsearch-8.3.0-SNAPSHOT-c17ab3643e2b2d3125d025e1865dc9f1e67806a6 "index template [test-composable-1] has index patterns [tsdb_templated_*] matching patterns from existing older templates [global] with patterns (global => [*]); this template [test-composable-1] will take precedence during new index creation"
]
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.DoSection.checkWarningHeaders(DoSection.java:511)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.DoSection.execute(DoSection.java:369)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:492)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:472)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:-2)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86804 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86980 | 300a578ad3bff3f2a5cfcd98a5ad5d0742c876c0 | 30bb96475eca985c414a75de49b734a29a348781 | "2022-05-16T13:24:55Z" | java | "2022-05-20T15:59:18Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,803 | [".ci/scripts/packaging-test.sh"] | BWC tests failing due to git permissions failure | BWC fail to run as git clone fails.
This has failed a couple of times on ubuntu:
- https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/62qrl2o67t5ja
- https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/sc7o4hgjwfrpk
```
fatal: unsafe repository ('/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/elastic+elasticsearch+8.2+multijob+packaging-tests-upgrade/BWC_VERSION/7.17.4/os/ubuntu-20.04-packaging' is owned by someone else) |
| To add an exception for this directory, call: |
| |
| git config --global --add safe.directory /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/elastic+elasticsearch+8.2+multijob+packaging-tests-upgrade/BWC_VERSION/7.17.4/os/ubuntu-20.04-packaging
```
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86803 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86812 | 793920255bcf7a2901bb67667337730fe637d1c4 | 05d743a81748c981c1af0b992d65102c7e25df87 | "2022-05-16T11:47:40Z" | java | "2022-05-16T20:12:34Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,724 | ["docs/changelog/88470.yaml", "server/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/snapshots/ConcurrentSnapshotsIT.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/snapshots/SnapshotsService.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/snapshots/SnapshotsServiceTests.java"] | [CI] SnapshotStressTestsIT testRandomActivities failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/anyfhhx6i7naw/tests/:server:internalClusterTest/org.elasticsearch.snapshots.SnapshotStressTestsIT/testRandomActivities
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':server:internalClusterTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.snapshots.SnapshotStressTestsIT.testRandomActivities" -Dtests.seed=EB88608F2635B7C9 -Dtests.locale=tr-TR -Dtests.timezone=Pacific/Wake -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
8.2
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.snapshots.SnapshotStressTestsIT&tests.test=testRandomActivities
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: failed to acquire all permits: [repo-0, index-0, index-1, index-2, node_s5, node_s4, node_s3, node_s2, node_s1, node_s0]
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.elasticsearch.snapshots.SnapshotStressTestsIT$TrackedCluster.run(SnapshotStressTestsIT.java:345)
at org.elasticsearch.snapshots.SnapshotStressTestsIT.testRandomActivities(SnapshotStressTestsIT.java:84)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:-2)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86724 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/88470 | 7382fa3a32457b03f083fe4435906f0cc149ae33 | 0e8f5e4d0a243eadc0cbb887b2379120ec5e3037 | "2022-05-12T09:33:29Z" | java | "2022-07-27T08:12:14Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,705 | ["docs/changelog/87633.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/indices/recovery/RecoverySettings.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/indices/recovery/RecoverySettingsTests.java"] | snapshot-based peer recovery warning despite not using `indices.recovery.use_snapshots=true` | ### Elasticsearch Version
Version: 8.2.0, Build: default/tar/b174af62e8dd9f4ac4d25875e9381ffe2b9282c5/2022-04-20T10:35:10.180408517Z, JVM: 18
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
MacOS Darwin Kernel Version 21.4.0
### Problem Description
Elasticsearch throws snapshot-based peer recovery warnings despite setting `"indices.recovery.use_snapshots": false` + having `"use_for_peer_recovery": false` set on the repository.
### Steps to Reproduce
This could be tested with a 2x node cluster consisting of 1x `master/data` and 1x `data` node.
Create a snapshot repository with `"use_for_peer_recovery": false`:
```
PUT _snapshot/my_snapshot_repo
{
"type": "fs",
"settings": {
"location": "backups",
"use_for_peer_recovery": false
}
}
```
Ensure `"indices.recovery.use_snapshots": false` is set:
```
PUT _cluster/settings
{
"persistent": {
"indices.recovery.use_snapshots": false
}
}
```
Stop the data-only node and remove the contents of its `./data/indices` directory, then restart the node.
The node should log warnings about not being able to perform snapshot-based peer recoveries.
A couple other observations:
- The log message (below) is a bit confusing because `indices.recovery.max_concurrent_snapshot_file_downloads` has been left at defaults.
- These warnings can also be seen when using `"indices.recovery.use_snapshots": true` + ` "use_for_peer_recovery": true` but no valid snapshot of the index exists.
### Logs (if relevant)
```
[2022-05-11T14:51:14,538][INFO ][o.e.n.Node ] [node-c] started
[2022-05-11T14:51:15,834][WARN ][o.e.i.r.RecoverySettings ] [node-c] Unable to acquire permit to use snapshot files during recovery, this recovery will recover index files from the source node. Ensure snapshot files can be used during recovery by setting [indices.recovery.max_concurrent_snapshot_file_downloads] to be no greater than [25]
[2022-05-11T14:51:24,499][WARN ][o.e.i.r.RecoverySettings ] [node-c] Unable to acquire permit to use snapshot files during recovery, this recovery will recover index files from the source node. Ensure snapshot files can be used during recovery by setting [indices.recovery.max_concurrent_snapshot_file_downloads] to be no greater than [25]
[2022-05-11T14:51:25,005][WARN ][o.e.i.r.RecoverySettings ] [node-c] Unable to acquire permit to use snapshot files during recovery, this recovery will recover index files from the source node. Ensure snapshot files can be used during recovery by setting [indices.recovery.max_concurrent_snapshot_file_downloads] to be no greater than [25]
[2022-05-11T14:51:32,363][WARN ][o.e.i.r.RecoverySettings ] [node-c] Unable to acquire permit to use snapshot files during recovery, this recovery will recover index files from the source node. Ensure snapshot files can be used during recovery by setting [indices.recovery.max_concurrent_snapshot_file_downloads] to be no greater than [25]
[2022-05-11T14:51:48,103][WARN ][o.e.i.r.RecoverySettings ] [node-c] Unable to acquire permit to use snapshot files during recovery, this recovery will recover index files from the source node. Ensure snapshot files can be used during recovery by setting [indices.recovery.max_concurrent_snapshot_file_downloads] to be no greater than [25]
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86705 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87633 | ca7783c4296c72e70ba22139f589a8ee817cbffa | 76eaa82099f3aa1fbd5c18f2d3990d6708cad231 | "2022-05-11T19:50:34Z" | java | "2022-06-16T12:45:16Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,694 | ["docs/changelog/86732.yaml", "x-pack/docs/en/security/auditing/event-types.asciidoc", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/audit/AuditTrail.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/audit/AuditTrailService.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/audit/logfile/LoggingAuditTrail.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/transport/filter/IPFilter.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/audit/AuditTrailServiceTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/audit/logfile/LoggingAuditTrailFilterTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/audit/logfile/LoggingAuditTrailTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/transport/filter/IPFilterTests.java"] | Audit events do not consistently include the port number in "origin.address" | Some types of audit event samples from [our documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/audit-event-types.html) include the port number in "origin.address", like **access_denied**:
```json
{"type":"audit", "timestamp":"2020-12-30T22:30:06,949+0200", "node.id":
"0RMNyghkQYCc_gVd1G6tZQ", "event.type":"transport", "event.action":
"access_denied", "authentication.type":"REALM", "user.name":"user1",
"user.realm":"default_native", "user.roles":["test_role"], "origin.type":
"rest", "origin.address":"[::1]:52434", "request.id":"yKOgWn2CRQCKYgZRz3phJw",
"action":"indices:admin/auto_create", "request.name":"CreateIndexRequest",
"indices":["<index-{now/d+1d}>"]}
```
but other types like **connection_denied** from this issue does not include the port:
```json
{"type":"audit", "timestamp":"2020-12-30T21:47:31,526+0200", "node.id":
"0RMNyghkQYCc_gVd1G6tZQ", "event.type":"ip_filter", "event.action":
"connection_denied", "origin.type":"rest", "origin.address":"10.10.0.20",
"transport.profile":".http", "rule":"deny 10.10.0.0/16"}
```
I think we should be consistent here and always include the port number in the "origin.address" field. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86694 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86732 | fa4953adca7c82a749c983bef86f3e562138e31e | 954d288f4587e014ba5b381bce2bd090ce12285c | "2022-05-11T15:46:56Z" | java | "2022-05-20T11:16:18Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,572 | ["docs/changelog/86574.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/ilm/qa/multi-node/src/javaRestTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/MigrateToDataTiersIT.java", "x-pack/plugin/ilm/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ilm/action/TransportMigrateToDataTiersAction.java"] | Migrate to data tiers routing API doesn't reroute | ### Elasticsearch Version
7.17, 8.x
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Darwin
### Problem Description
The migrate to data tiers routing API changes the allocation configuration for
the indices that need migrating to data tiers routing.
After such changes we should do a cluster re-route so the allocation changes
take effect immediately.
### Steps to Reproduce
1. On a one node `data_hot,data_content,master` node create the following index
```
PUT datatiers_problem_index
{
"settings": {
"index.routing.allocation.include._tier_preference": "data_hot",
"index.routing.allocation.require.data": "hot"
}
}
```
2. Migrate to data tiers and observe the shard is not allocated afterwards
`POST _ilm/migrate_to_data_tiers`
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86572 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86574 | 7e17630e36d3aadeec441470b1e882514e83c550 | 17a62d19f93d6c53b4406c7d111baa02f9a424e1 | "2022-05-09T13:59:40Z" | java | "2022-05-11T12:28:24Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,567 | ["client/test/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/client/GraalVMThreadsFilter.java", "client/test/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/client/RestClientTestCase.java"] | Client tests failing with ThreadLeakError | ### CI Link
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/mw2zhgjnaroxk
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/og2cnfo5yzhyi
In both cases the tests ran on the `graalvm-ce17` JVM.
### Repro line
NA
### Does it reproduce?
Didn't try
### Applicable branches
main
### Failure history
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?search.timeZoneId=Europe/London&tests.container=org.elasticsearch.client.RestClientMultipleHostsTests&tests.test=classMethod
### Failure excerpt
```
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakError: There are still zombie threads that couldn't be terminated:
| 1) Thread[id=24, name=Libgraal MBean Registration, state=TIMED_WAITING, group=main] |
| at [email protected]/java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) |
| at platform/jdk.internal.vm.compiler.management/org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.management.Factory.run(Factory.java:111) |
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86567 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86976 | e51424deef25be00a93f14801d76863f3cd09df1 | 26d98d39ceaad20865c7d5a4f8f218d27499b0ad | "2022-05-09T12:03:06Z" | java | "2022-05-20T17:18:01Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,560 | ["docs/changelog/86555.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/geo/SimpleFeatureFactory.java", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/licenses/mapbox-vector-tile-NOTICE.txt", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/feature/FeatureFactory.java", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/feature/PatchedJtsAdapter.java", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/feature/FeatureFactoryTests.java"] | Foreground extrusions missing with vector tile returned by the vector tile search API | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.2.0
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Elastic Cloud on GCP
### Problem Description
We use Mapbox GL JS to retrieve tiles from the new vector tile search API.
Everything work as expected until we try to extrude the features to display it in 3D:
```
map.addLayer({
id: 'building_layer',
type: "fill-extrusion",
source: 'building_source',
minzoom: 12,
"source-layer": "hits",
paint: {
"fill-extrusion-color": "#00ade6",
"fill-extrusion-height": 2,
},
});
```
As you can see on the image, the foreground extrusions is missing:
When I decode the tile using node-mapnik I get:
```
[{"name":"hits","extent":4096,"version":2,"features":[{"type":3,"properties":{"_id":"59633","_index":"building-v1","id":59633,"gross_floor":180,"floor_nb":2,"unit_nb":1,"protected_rank":0,"principal_type":"Zone d'habitation de très faible densité","city_name":"La Tour-de-Peilz"},"geometry":[9,934,5244,26,22,18,6,7,21,17,15]}]},{"name":"meta","extent":4096,"version":2,"features":[{"type":3,"properties":{"_shards.failed":0,"_shards.skipped":0,"_shards.successful":1,"_shards.total":1,"timed_out":false,"took":1},"geometry":[9,0,8192,26,8192,0,0,8191,8191,0,15]}]}]
```
Then when I try to get the validity report of this tile with node-mapnik I got the following error:
```
[Error: Vector Tile has POLYGON with first ring clockwise. It is not valid according to v2 of VT spec.]
```
As @iverase mentionned it [here](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/foreground-extrusions-missing-with-vector-tile-returned-by-the-vector-tile-search-api/304137), this looks very similar to the bug fixed in the upstream library you are using and seems the fix has never been released:
https://github.com/wdtinc/mapbox-vector-tile-java/issues/36
### Steps to Reproduce
Create any index with a geoshape:
```
PUT /extrusion_issue
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"location": {
"type": "geo_shape"
}
}
}
}
```
Insert a document with polygon:
```
POST /extrusion_issue/_doc
{
"location" : {
"type" : "Polygon",
"coordinates" : [
[
[
6.865488747,
46.459649483
],
[
6.865734629,
46.459515699
],
[
6.865794859,
46.45956863
],
[
6.865549366,
46.459702596
],
[
6.865488747,
46.459649483
]
]
]
}
}
```
Use mapbox GL JS to retrieve the tile form the vector tile search API and extrude the polygon:
```
map.addLayer({
id: 'building_layer',
type: "fill-extrusion",
source: 'building_source',
minzoom: 12,
"source-layer": "hits",
paint: {
"fill-extrusion-color": "#00ade6",
"fill-extrusion-height": 2,
},
});
```
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86560 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86555 | 7f591b1217a5eafb4ab0ff7d7ebe528d0c6444bb | 6efa188b5e3b54b3e44ae3f51821a75c15b5651b | "2022-05-09T10:04:45Z" | java | "2022-05-17T13:53:23Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,940 | ["distribution/tools/cli-launcher/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/launcher/CliToolLauncher.java", "distribution/tools/cli-launcher/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/launcher/CliToolLauncherTests.java"] | [Certs]: Java exceptions while creating certs using `elasticsearch-certutil` tool. | **Kibana version:** 8.3 Snapshot Kibana self-managed environment
**Host OS and Browser version:** Windows, All
**Build details:**
```
VERSION: 8.3.0 Snapshot self-managed
BUILD: 52512
COMMIT: df225b213b188c81888141cee2ec191424fc0649
Elasticsearch artifact link: https://snapshots.elastic.co/8.3.0-6ba9f710/downloads/elasticsearch/elasticsearch-8.3.0-SNAPSHOT-windows-x86_64.zip
```
**Preconditions:**
1. 8.3 Snapshot Kibana self-managed environment should be available.
**Steps to reproduce:**
1. Navigate to `C:\elk\elasticsearch\bin>` through cmd.
2. Run below command:
`elasticsearch-certutil ca --pem`
3. Observe Java exceptions on running cert creation command.
**Expected Result:**
CA cert should be created on running `elasticsearch-certutil ca --pem` command.
**Screenshot:**
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86940 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86944 | 8127080f5e139d568d617db5856b3da606a49a07 | 4b2d553e51ac5e0dd62d9ca6147e46f6a8a5b227 | "2022-05-06T06:53:55Z" | java | "2022-05-20T00:07:59Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,428 | ["docs/changelog/85512.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/action/SecurityActionMapper.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/action/SecurityActionMapperTests.java", "x-pack/qa/runtime-fields/with-security/src/javaRestTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/PermissionsIT.java"] | Resolve permissions issue with `cluster:admin/scripts/painless/execute` | 2nd attempt at https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84591
references https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/48856#issuecomment-831144741
tldr; the permission structure for the endpoint isn't useful for most users. If users can create runtime fields they should have access to this api, they shouldn't need a specific permission set. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86428 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85512 | 40230125f50f6e87a3844dccc57ebf0e75aacca7 | a48965decf34624e2494c37fc424c36f57d1c427 | "2022-05-04T15:33:33Z" | java | "2022-05-17T15:22:42Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,409 | ["x-pack/docs/en/security/authentication/saml-guide.asciidoc"] | [DOCS] SAML role mapping of groups does not parse comma separated lists to string array | ### Description
Following the documentation for setting up SAML integration with Elastic, it mentions using a "groups" attribute so the SAML server can pass a list of groups back to ElasticSearch/Kibana: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/saml-guide-stack.html
You will notice here that the role mapping is specifying the group name "finance-team".
```
PUT /_security/role_mapping/saml-finance
{
"roles": [ "finance_data" ],
"enabled": true,
"rules": { "all": [
{ "field": { "realm.name": "saml1" } },
{ "field": { "groups": "finance-team" } }
] }
}
```
In my case, we were unable to get this to work because the SAML server is actually passing a string that contains a comma separated list of security groups that the user belongs to and not just one single group.
Therefore, it appears that Elastic is not converting this string to an array. I do not know if this is by design but the purpose of opening this feature request is to document that you can actually use wildcards in the role mapping:
To document this better, I think these questions will need to be answered:
- Is Elastic supposed to parse the "groups" string from SAML into an array if it detects it is a comma separated string?
- Are the wildcards actually supported on the "text" type for the user field "groups". It works, but I didn't see it documented and wondering if it could stop working in the future.
This is what the SAML server is returning to Elastic/Kibana (example):
```
"rows": [
{
"name": "mail",
"value": "[email protected]",
"claimType": null,
"attrNameFormat": "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:unspecified",
"responsePosition": "BODY",
"checkRequest": false,
"returnResponse": true,
"getInput": false
},
{
"name": "nameid",
"value": "[email protected]",
"claimType": null,
"attrNameFormat": "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:unspecified",
"responsePosition": "BODY",
"checkRequest": false,
"returnResponse": true,
"getInput": false
},
{
"name": "groups",
"value": "Organization Management,Discovery Management,Mailbox Import and Export Role,Domain Admins,Denied RODC Password Replication Group,VPN Users,Offer Remote Assistance Helpers,MSSQL - Admins,Systems Analyst",
"claimType": null,
"attrNameFormat": "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:unspecified",
"responsePosition": "BODY",
"checkRequest": false,
"returnResponse": true,
"getInput": false
}
],
```
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86409 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86770 | db08d619989a3e9e67aff376239ef8e35a010eed | 7f591b1217a5eafb4ab0ff7d7ebe528d0c6444bb | "2022-05-03T21:59:36Z" | java | "2022-05-17T13:36:55Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,383 | ["docs/changelog/87841.yaml", "docs/reference/modules/cluster/disk_allocator.asciidoc", "server/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/routing/allocation/DiskThresholdMonitorIT.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/InternalClusterInfoService.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/routing/allocation/DiskThresholdMonitor.java"] | Auto unlocking after recovering from flood-stage watermark (high disk usage) not working with threshold_enabled disabled | ### Elasticsearch Version
Version: 8.1.3, Build: default/rpm/39afaa3c0fe7db4869a161985e240bd7182d7a07/2022-04-19T08:13:25.444693396Z, JVM: 18
### Installed Plugins
translations,licensing,globalSearch,globalSearchProviders,features,mapsEms,licenseApiGuard,usageCollection,taskManager,telemetryCollectionManager,telemetryCollectionXpack,kibanaUsageCollection,sharedUX,share,embeddable,uiActionsEnhanced,screenshotMode,screenshotting,banners,telemetry,newsfeed,fieldFormats,expressions,dataViews,charts,esUiShared,bfetch,data,savedObjects,presentationUtil,expressionShape,expressionRevealImage,expressionRepeatImage,expressionMetric,expressionImage,customIntegrations,home,searchprofiler,painlessLab,grokdebugger,management,watcher,licenseManagement,advancedSettings,spaces,security,savedObjectsTagging,reporting,lists,fileUpload,ingestPipelines,encryptedSavedObjects,dataEnhanced,cloud,snapshotRestore,eventLog,actions,alerting,triggersActionsUi,transform,stackAlerts,ruleRegistry,savedObjectsManagement,console,controls,graph,fleet,indexManagement,remoteClusters,crossClusterReplication,indexLifecycleManagement,visualizations,canvas,visTypeXy,visTypeVislib,visTypeVega,visTypeTimeseries,rollup,visTypeTimelion,visTypeTagcloud,visTypeTable,visTypeMetric,visTypeHeatmap,visTypeMarkdown,dashboard,maps,dashboardEnhanced,expressionTagcloud,expressionPie,visTypePie,expressionMetricVis,expressionHeatmap,expressionGauge,dataViewFieldEditor,lens,cases,timelines,discover,osquery,observability,discoverEnhanced,dataVisualizer,ml,uptime,securitySolution,infra,upgradeAssistant,monitoring,logstash,enterpriseSearch,apm,dataViewManagement
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Linux kibana.q-mex.net 3.10.0-1160.59.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 23 16:47:03 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
### Problem Description
Some parts of the internet / stackoverflow / forums, advise to disable the `cluster.routing.allocation.disk.threshold_enabled` setting. This also disables the unlocking if the cluster is in a locked state, effectively creating a perma-lock (until someone changes the setting back).
This means indices stay locked even after disk usage dropped significantly. This is especially bothersome for indices like `.security` and `.async-search` which do not allow manual intervention.
(Not that big of a deal, having figured out now what caused my lockup. I wanted to create this GH issue for sake of documentation - I'd be OK if this were closed as `wontfix`)
### Steps to Reproduce
- Have a high disk usage to cause the lockup - ideally in a single-node deployment
- Get your disk usage back to normal levels (63% in my case)
- See that nothing happens
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86383 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87841 | a054accf5f3dfe0c138e46a2c583220b47d72437 | 806d2976aa3e2ec18a1674fecad7ae25af6c7f6b | "2022-05-03T08:48:17Z" | java | "2022-07-26T12:26:43Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,382 | ["libs/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/core/internal/provider/EmbeddedImplClassLoader.java", "libs/core/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/core/internal/provider/EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests.java", "test/framework/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/bootstrap/BootstrapForTesting.java", "test/framework/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/test/PrivilegedOperations.java", "test/framework/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/test/compiler/InMemoryJavaCompiler.java"] | [CI] EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests classMethod failing | It seems this error is windows specific
**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/6emvfcapta7xc/tests/:libs:elasticsearch-core:test/org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests/classMethod
**Reproduction line:**
`null`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests&tests.test=classMethod
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-031\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-031\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-031: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-031
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-030\foo.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-030\foo.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-030\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-030\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-030: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-030
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-029\foo.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-029\foo.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-029\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-029\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-029: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-029
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-028\foo.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-028\foo.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-028\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-028\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-028: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-028
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-027\foo.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-027\foo.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-027\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-027\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-027: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-027
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-026\foo.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-026\foo.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-026\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-026\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-026: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-026
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-025\foo.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-025\foo.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-025\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-025\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-025: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-025
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-024\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-024\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-024: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-024
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-023\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-023\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-023: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-023
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-022\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-022\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-022: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-022
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-021\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-021\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-021: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-021
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-020\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-020\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-020: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-020
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-019\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-019\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-019: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-019
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-018\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-018\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-018: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-018
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-017\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-017\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-017: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-017
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-016\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-016\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-016: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-016
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-015\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-015\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-015: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-015
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-014\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-014\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-014: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-014
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-013\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-013\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-013: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-013
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-012\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-012\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-012: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-012
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-011\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-011\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-011: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-011
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-010\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-010\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-010: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-010
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-009\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-009\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-009: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-009
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-008\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-008\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-008: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-008
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-007\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-007\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-007: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-007
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-006\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-006\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-006: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-006
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-005\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-005\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-005: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-005
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-004\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-004\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-004: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-004
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-003\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-003\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-003: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-003
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-002\impl.jar: java.nio.file.FileSystemException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-002\impl.jar: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-002: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001\tempDir-002
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\platform-support\86\libs\core\build\testrun\test\temp\org.elasticsearch.core.internal.provider.EmbeddedImplClassLoaderTests_36EE57C60F909609-001
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([36EE57C60F909609]:0)
at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.rm(IOUtils.java:341)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:209)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterAlways(TestRuleAdapter.java:31)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86382 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86413 | b71e53209f7c93e5b0ebafd643ffcccdbb375d40 | e30a0698392a6fe873aa36d134a9b0abf0fe3d11 | "2022-05-03T08:47:28Z" | java | "2022-05-06T08:53:05Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,377 | ["docs/changelog/86582.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/analytics/nested_top_metrics_sort.yml"] | [CI] XPackRestIT test {p0=analytics/nested_top_metrics_sort/terms order by top metrics size greater than 1 rewrite_to_filter_by_filter true} failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/gunr75fkh2a6q/tests/:x-pack:plugin:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT/test%20%7Bp0=analytics%2Fnested_top_metrics_sort%2Fterms%20order%20by%20top%20metrics%20size%20greater%20than%201%20rewrite_to_filter_by_filter%20true%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT.test {p0=analytics/nested_top_metrics_sort/terms order by top metrics size greater than 1 rewrite_to_filter_by_filter true}" -Dtests.seed=B86B6FF5AB8C1A8B -Dtests.locale=zh-Hant-TW -Dtests.timezone=Antarctica/Palmer -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
Yes
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT&tests.test=test%20%7Bp0%3Danalytics/nested_top_metrics_sort/terms%20order%20by%20top%20metrics%20size%20greater%20than%201%20rewrite_to_filter_by_filter%20true%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [analytics/nested_top_metrics_sort:804]:
Expected: <3>
but: was <4>
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([B86B6FF5AB8C1A8B:303F502F05707773]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:503)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:472)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor14.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError:
Expected: <3>
but: was <4>
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:923)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.MatchAssertion.doAssert(MatchAssertion.java:99)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:492)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:472)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor14.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86377 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86582 | 854d9d8a15b1107f6e08afd9c850bb0fbfeaf25c | 29552f8484394822f387a22d0ffbbf218fe840ce | "2022-05-03T07:32:07Z" | java | "2022-05-09T18:54:51Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,352 | ["distribution/tools/plugin-cli/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/plugins/cli/ListPluginsCommandTests.java", "docs/changelog/86408.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/plugins/PluginInfo.java"] | Support Windows line separators in PluginInfo.toString | We have hardcoded Unix-style newlines in PluginInfo.toString. We should use `System.lineSeparator()` instead. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86352 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86408 | 286cb2b26c5dd37d6cca8973fa684d885c1f65e9 | e71efbd21119f57ef2a0f5cfd6bf4e3c9427ca89 | "2022-05-02T16:05:41Z" | java | "2022-05-04T13:00:39Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,334 | ["docs/reference/setup/add-nodes.asciidoc"] | [Docs] "Add and remove nodes" docs should link to security "Enroll additional nodes" docs | ### Description
In the **Set up Elasticsearch** section of the docs, there is a page for [Add and remove nodes in your cluster](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/add-elasticsearch-nodes.html).
It has these instructions:
> 1. Set up a new Elasticsearch instance.
> 2. Specify the name of the cluster with the cluster.name setting in elasticsearch.yml. For example, to add a node to the logging-prod cluster, add the line cluster.name: "logging-prod" to elasticsearch.yml.
> 3. Start Elasticsearch. The node automatically discovers and joins the specified cluster.
However, if security (including TLS between nodes) is enabled (which it is by default) those instructions will not work, because each node will generate its own set of certificates.
Those steps should include some sort of link to the relevant security docs to [Enroll additional nodes in your cluster](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/configuring-stack-security.html#stack-enroll-nodes) | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86334 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/89393 | 65b05f858e3ea32f5df3f31fce55e489127cd158 | 2fad061394f62584f18693c985ad0a8b8b0c6db8 | "2022-05-02T07:56:22Z" | java | "2022-08-25T12:51:03Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,273 | ["server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/AggregationErrors.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/support/AggregationPath.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/support/AggregationPathTests.java"] | AggregationPath parsing throws the wrong exception type status code | When parsing `AggregationPath` strings, if we hit an error, we throw `AggregationExecutionException`, which is a 500 class error. But 500 class errors usually mean that retrying the request might improve the situation, where in this case we want to indicate that the user should not retry with the same request (they need to fix the path expression). | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86273 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86532 | a13b050911ec12327686b2d0befa1934b8622dbd | a052a4b712e092e1a726994aeeb74830390515e4 | "2022-04-28T19:40:28Z" | java | "2022-05-09T12:19:09Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,267 | ["docs/changelog/86191.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/termsenum/action/TransportTermsEnumAction.java", "x-pack/plugin/mapper-constant-keyword/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/constantkeyword/mapper/ConstantKeywordFieldMapper.java", "x-pack/plugin/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/terms_enum/10_basic.yml"] | Terms enum API throws null pointer exception when remote shards fail | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.3.0
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
arm64
### Problem Description
When using the `_terms_enum` API, if remote clusters return failures, but the local cluster doesn't, a null exception is thrown:
```
{
"error": {
"root_cause": [
{
"type": "null_pointer_exception",
"reason": "Cannot invoke \"java.util.List.add(Object)\" because \"shardFailures\" is null"
}
],
"type": "null_pointer_exception",
"reason": "Cannot invoke \"java.util.List.add(Object)\" because \"shardFailures\" is null"
},
"status": 500
}
```
### Steps to Reproduce
Call the _terms_enum API with a remote cluster that will return failures, e.g. because of this bug: https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86187
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86267 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86191 | b323e8e1db5ab0efda60c8b12e6658807fb20da3 | bc5cfcf4b2f23801678d9b5bab59a2d5c185d517 | "2022-04-28T13:44:36Z" | java | "2022-04-29T13:12:11Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,249 | ["docs/changelog/86315.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/transport/ClusterConnectionManager.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/transport/ClusterConnectionManagerTests.java"] | Incomplete remote response handler after transport close in integration tests | ### CI Link
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/ma2rjwewae6hi
### Repro line
./gradlew ':server:internalClusterTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT" -Dtests.seed=D2D36E011E6F103B -Dtests.locale=en-US -Dtests.timezone=UTC -Druntime.java=17
### Does it reproduce?
No
### Applicable branches
master
### Failure history
_No response_
### Failure excerpt
I don't think the failed test suite (`MultiTermVectorsIT`) has anything to do with this failure.
```
Apr 28, 2022 7:07:07 AM com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl checkThreadLeaks |
-- | --
| 2> SEVERE: 73 threads leaked from SUITE scope at org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT: |
| 2> 1) Thread[id=308, name=elasticsearch[node_s3][generic][T#1], state=WAITING, group=TGRP-MultiTermVectorsIT] |
| 2> at [email protected]/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:341) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.LinkedTransferQueue$Node.block(LinkedTransferQueue.java:470) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.unmanagedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3463) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3434) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.LinkedTransferQueue.awaitMatch(LinkedTransferQueue.java:669) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.LinkedTransferQueue.xfer(LinkedTransferQueue.java:616) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.LinkedTransferQueue.take(LinkedTransferQueue.java:1286) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1062) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1122) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) |
| 2> at [email protected]/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
```
And anther relevant snippet:
```
java.lang.RuntimeException: file handle leaks: [FileChannel(/dev/shm/elastic+elasticsearch+main+intake+multijob+part1/server/build/testrun/internalClusterTest/temp/org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT_D2D36E011E6F103B-001/tempDir-002/node_s2/_state/write.lock), FileChannel(/dev/shm/elastic+elasticsearch+main+intake+multijob+part1/server/build/testrun/internalClusterTest/temp/org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT_D2D36E011E6F103B-001/tempDir-002/node_s0/_state/write.lock), FileChannel(/dev/shm/elastic+elasticsearch+main+intake+multijob+part1/server/build/testrun/internalClusterTest/temp/org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT_D2D36E011E6F103B-001/tempDir-002/node_s1/node.lock), FileChannel(/dev/shm/elastic+elasticsearch+main+intake+multijob+part1/server/build/testrun/internalClusterTest/temp/org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT_D2D36E011E6F103B-001/tempDir-002/node_s2/_state/_m.cfs), FileChannel(/dev/shm/elastic+elasticsearch+main+intake+multijob+part1/server/build/testrun/internalClusterTest/temp/org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT_D2D36E011E6F103B-001/tempDir-002/node_s1/_state/write.lock), FileChannel(/dev/shm/elastic+elasticsearch+main+intake+multijob+part1/server/build/testrun/internalClusterTest/temp/org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT_D2D36E011E6F103B-001/tempDir-002/node_s3/node.lock), FileChannel(/dev/shm/elastic+elasticsearch+main+intake+multijob+part1/server/build/testrun/internalClusterTest/temp/org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT_D2D36E011E6F103B-001/tempDir-002/node_s2/node.lock), FileChannel(/dev/shm/elastic+elasticsearch+main+intake+multijob+part1/server/build/testrun/internalClusterTest/temp/org.elasticsearch.action.termvectors.MultiTermVectorsIT_D2D36E011E6F103B-001/tempDir-002/node_s0/node.lock)] |
-- | --
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile.LeakFS.onClose(LeakFS.java:63) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile.FilterFileSystem.close(FilterFileSystem.java:70) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile.FilterFileSystem.close(FilterFileSystem.java:71) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:223) |
| at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterAlways(TestRuleAdapter.java:31) |
| at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43) |
| at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47) |
| at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) |
| at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375) |
| at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831) |
| at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833) |
| |
| Caused by: |
| java.lang.Exception |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile.LeakFS.onOpen(LeakFS.java:46) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.callOpenHook(HandleTrackingFS.java:82) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.newFileChannel(HandleTrackingFS.java:202) |
| at org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.newFileChannel(HandleTrackingFS.java:171) |
| at java.base/java.nio.channels.FileChannel.open(FileChannel.java:298) |
| at java.base/java.nio.channels.FileChannel.open(FileChannel.java:357) |
| at org.apache.lucene.store.NativeFSLockFactory.obtainFSLock(NativeFSLockFactory.java:112) |
| at org.apache.lucene.store.FSLockFactory.obtainLock(FSLockFactory.java:43) |
| at org.apache.lucene.store.BaseDirectory.obtainLock(BaseDirectory.java:44) |
| at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.<init>(IndexWriter.java:947) |
| at org.elasticsearch.gateway.PersistedClusterStateService.createIndexWriter(PersistedClusterStateService.java:254) |
| at org.elasticsearch.gateway.PersistedClusterStateService.createWriter(PersistedClusterStateService.java:216) |
| at org.elasticsearch.gateway.GatewayMetaState$LucenePersistedState.<init>(GatewayMetaState.java:448) |
| at org.elasticsearch.gateway.GatewayMetaState.start(GatewayMetaState.java:131) |
| at org.elasticsearch.node.Node.start(Node.java:1167) |
| at org.elasticsearch.test.InternalTestCluster$NodeAndClient.startNode(InternalTestCluster.java:982) |
| at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539) |
| at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) |
| at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.ThreadContext$ContextPreservingRunnable.run(ThreadContext.java:714) |
| at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136) |
| at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) |
| ... 1 more
```
Link to logs: https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/ma2rjwewae6hi/console-log#L9010 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86249 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86315 | 6b8e141272593cb39a59f2a6c258d04ce8d729a4 | 22136f056cff00d714cdec2e60fe03605cc60004 | "2022-04-28T07:32:35Z" | java | "2022-05-02T07:49:30Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,203 | ["docs/changelog/89557.yaml", "docs/reference/ilm/actions/ilm-rollover.asciidoc", "docs/reference/settings/ilm-settings.asciidoc", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/LifecycleSettings.java", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/WaitForRolloverReadyStep.java", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/WaitForRolloverReadyStepTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/ilm/qa/multi-node/src/javaRestTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ilm/actions/RolloverActionIT.java", "x-pack/plugin/ilm/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ilm/IndexLifecycle.java"] | Prevent ILM from spuriously rolling over (many) empty indices | ### Description
This has been brought up a few times in different forms, see https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/46161, https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/73349, https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/83039, https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85054.
Any ILM policy with a `max_age` associated with the `rollover` action could trigger this scenario, but in order to talk about something concrete, I'll use metricbeat as an example (double emphasizing, though, this isn't unique to metricbeat, it's just the nature of the way `rollover` currently works with a `max_age`).
With a test 8.1.3 Elasticsearch cluster, I ran `metricbeat-8.1.2` for a few seconds and then stopped it, and then `metricbeat-8.1.3` for a bit longer. The default `metricbeat` policy has rollover with `"max_age" : "30d"` (30 days) but in order to illustrate this problem better, I've set that to `"1m"` (1 minute) instead:
```
PUT /_cluster/settings
{
"persistent": {
"indices.lifecycle.poll_interval": "5s"
}
}
PUT _ilm/policy/metricbeat
{
"policy" : {
"phases" : {
"hot" : {
"min_age" : "0ms",
"actions" : {
"rollover" : {
"max_size" : "50gb",
"max_age" : "1m"
}
}
}
}
}
}
```
After a few minutes, my cluster looks like this:
```
GET _cat/indices/.ds-metricbeat-*?s=index
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.2-2022.04.26-000001 GBqDAprYSl2NmFzi81n9Ug 1 1 1134 0 652.2kb 652.2kb
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.2-2022.04.26-000002 Ybd4SCiWT0-7W0v9zKPR4A 1 1 0 0 225b 225b
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.2-2022.04.26-000003 3_9OmFkOSKaEfF_J-_D9TA 1 1 0 0 225b 225b
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.2-2022.04.26-000004 4olQItwcTtCOWrBotcqoLw 1 1 0 0 225b 225b
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.2-2022.04.26-000005 N9_gYkcORWSVfacUwnDegw 1 1 0 0 225b 225b
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.3-2022.04.26-000001 kWW-N_bfRbO0vMR4z3F72g 1 1 862 0 639.2kb 639.2kb
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.3-2022.04.26-000002 qzu-L-zZQqqm-6GQAZMtgA 1 1 235 0 431.2kb 431.2kb
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.3-2022.04.26-000003 iW68NzFyTv-CCAg3Rsfj4A 1 1 265 0 494kb 494kb
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.3-2022.04.26-000004 NaIa-gUjShKpEHzNcAxA3w 1 1 234 0 451.7kb 451.7kb
yellow open .ds-metricbeat-8.1.3-2022.04.26-000005 lDhzxqtdR8miPnqvsf7HDQ 1 1 271 0 595.8kb 595.8kb
```
That is, for a little while, the first writer (metricbeat version 8.1.2) wrote documents, and then it stopped and was upgraded and replaced by the second writer (metricbeat version 8.1.3). Each of those writers uses a versioned datastream (`metricbeat-8.1.2` and `metricbeat-8.1.3` respectively).
The problem is easy to see -- notice that we're getting a new empty (0 document) `.ds-metricbeat-8.1.2-[...]` index every minute, and that we'll keep accumulating them forever. ILM doesn't have any special logic around empty indices like this, i.e. empty indices are treated the same as non-empty indices as far as ILM is concerned.
In this simple scenario, we know that the `metricbeat-8.1.2` datastream is done now, and can be retired. However, there's no particular point in time where Elasticsearch itself or some individual metricbeat process could know that. I'm using just one metricbeat writer, but I could be running one on each of N hosts. No one writer process in this scenario knows that it is special and should "turn off the lights when it's done".
To further complicate matters, maybe I have a weekly batch process which will run on Sunday evening and write some logs after a long quiet period (and its logs are still being monitored by metricbeat version 8.1.2)-- when it does so we could end up with more data flowing into the current `metricbeat-8.1.2` write index. Let's call that the "sporadic writer" case. In that case, we'd end up with periods of no data flowing in and the accumulation of empty indices, followed by one or more non-empty indices, and then back to accumulating empty indices again.
ILM doesn't know whether there's a sporadic writer out there or not, and ignorant of whether more documents will be coming one day, it dutifully executes the policy, rolling over the now defunct `metricbeat-8.1.2` datastream every minute and leaving a trail of empty `.ds-metricbeat-8.1.2-[...]` indices in its wake.
An additional note: my illustration here is datastream specific, but in the broad strokes this issue could also exist in a pre-datastream indexing strategy built around aliases. It would be most excellent if we were able to solve both the datastream and alias -based versions of this empty index problem (but reserving a degree of freedom, I don't think the solution must necessarily be precisely the same in both cases). | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86203 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/89557 | eddfc250e8f1aeb81275fcde0f97ab995ebb7ef7 | 21356162eb6817c5af4a3678fc49da7b7ace4332 | "2022-04-26T22:18:11Z" | java | "2022-09-19T22:37:41Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,136 | ["docs/changelog/90309.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/SearchUtils.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/search/SearchUtilsTests.java"] | The maximum number of clauses automatically gets set to 1024 when heap size is less than 1GB | The code to compute the maximum number of clauses looks like this:
```java
public static int calculateMaxClauseValue(ThreadPool threadPool) {
int searchThreadPoolSize = threadPool.info(ThreadPool.Names.SEARCH).getMax();
long heapSize = JvmStats.jvmStats().getMem().getHeapMax().getGb();
return calculateMaxClauseValue(searchThreadPoolSize, heapSize);
}
static int calculateMaxClauseValue(long threadPoolSize, double heapInGb) {
if (threadPoolSize <= 0 || heapInGb <= 0) {
return DEFAULT_MAX_CLAUSE_COUNT;
}
// In a worst-case scenario, each clause may end up using up to 16k of memory
// to load postings, positions, offsets, impacts, etc. So we calculate the
// maximum number of clauses we can support in a single thread pool by
// dividing the heap by 16k (or the equivalent, multiplying the heap in GB by
// 64k), and then divide that by the number of possible concurrent search
// threads.
int maxClauseCount = (int) (heapInGb * 65_536 / threadPoolSize);
return Math.max(DEFAULT_MAX_CLAUSE_COUNT, maxClauseCount);
}
```
@nkhristinin reported the following surprising behavior. Say you have 1 vCPU and 2 search threads,
- If you have 1GB of heap to the JVM then `maxClauseCount` will be 32,768.
- But if you give slightly less than 1GB to the heap, e.g. 1023MB, then `long heapSize` will be 0 because of the cast performed by the `getGB()` call, and `maxClauseCount` will be set to 1,024 because ef the `heapInGb <= 0` condition.
It might not be a bad thing to be more careful with small heaps, but the code doesn't suggest that this behavior is intentional. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86136 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/90309 | fb762487fd39a351eba78ff840e81f56ad93bf12 | 9d11e2168e2b56b48f4c596d91b35cf5184f2429 | "2022-04-25T12:49:42Z" | java | "2022-09-29T14:30:13Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,121 | ["docs/reference/ccr/index.asciidoc"] | [DOCS] Document Cross Cluster Replication (CCR) limitations | ### Elasticsearch Version
7.x, 8.x
### Problem Description
Given the increased adoption of CCR, it seems it would make sense to provide a dedicated section or page to document any kind of limitations. For example, it is not clear whether system indices like `.security*` can or should be replicated or not.
One might think that CCR is an easy way to replicate Kibana saved objects, Fleet/APM settings, and similar and given that `leader_index_exclusion_patterns` seems to be empty by default, it is not clear whether it is discouraged to replicate such system indices or not.
For example https://github.com/elastic/enhancements/issues/11724 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86121 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87348 | 9660e8b1c2475a5a6c6f9d4fe95d048b0656c434 | 14ef513f2c6906f407c6be7dfeea784c42b725bd | "2022-04-25T07:10:25Z" | java | "2022-10-17T20:05:29Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,111 | ["modules/data-streams/build.gradle", "modules/data-streams/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/data_stream/150_tsdb.yml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/action/admin/cluster/state/TransportClusterStateAction.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/DataStream.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/DataStreamTests.java"] | DataStream: cat indices API in time_series mode is NPE | ### Elasticsearch Version
master
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
all
### Problem Description
cat indices API in time_series mode is NPE, The reproduce steps is below:
### Steps to Reproduce
```
# step 1
PUT _index_template/test
{
"index_patterns": [
"test"
],
"template": {
"settings": {
"index.routing_path": "foo"
},
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"foo": {
"type": "keyword",
"time_series_dimension": true
}
}
}
},
"data_stream": {
"index_mode": "time_series"
}
}
# step 2
PUT _data_stream/test
# step 3
GET _cluster/state/metadata/test
GET _cat/indices/test?v
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86111 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86112 | 08c3bda45a63519007fa9f9437e2d3fd5a99618e | 1e3ad0d3548fe4eb49014c55cbf59762d514e0cd | "2022-04-24T11:38:18Z" | java | "2022-04-28T06:50:24Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,058 | ["docs/changelog/86089.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/enrich/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/enrich/EnrichPolicyRunner.java", "x-pack/plugin/enrich/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/enrich/EnrichPolicyRunnerTests.java"] | Null pointer exception executing a range enrich policy with an "object" field | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.1.1
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Darwin Kernel Version 21.4.0
### Problem Description
Under certain conditions, executing a range enrich policy on a field with wrong datatype gives a NPE instead of a more comprehensible error.
### Steps to Reproduce
```
PUT enrich_index
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"object": {
"properties": {
"field": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
}
}
}
}
PUT /_enrich/policy/enrich_policy
{
"range": {
"indices": "enrich_index",
"match_field": "object",
"enrich_fields": ["enrich_field"]
}
}
POST /_enrich/policy/enrich_policy/_execute
```
Executing the policy returns:
```json
{
"error" : {
"root_cause" : [
{
"type" : "null_pointer_exception",
"reason" : "Cannot invoke \"String.hashCode()\" because \"<local7>\" is null"
}
],
"type" : "null_pointer_exception",
"reason" : "Cannot invoke \"String.hashCode()\" because \"<local7>\" is null"
},
"status" : 500
}
```
Interestingly enough, if the enrich index were created like this (without subfield in `object`):
```
PUT enrich_index
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"object": {
"properties": {
}
}
}
}
}
```
Executing the policy would return a much better error:
```json
{
"error" : {
"root_cause" : [
{
"type" : "exception",
"reason" : "Field 'object' has type [object] which doesn't appear to be a range type"
}
],
"type" : "exception",
"reason" : "Field 'object' has type [object] which doesn't appear to be a range type"
},
"status" : 500
}
```
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86058 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86089 | fbe1c59a7b5b960c7a11f7129b9980f16ae69cb8 | f0a86b5e38f53e4a233148c5eb964332c8f8fb6a | "2022-04-21T07:34:52Z" | java | "2022-05-02T14:41:26Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,055 | ["docs/changelog/86580.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/DataTiersUsageTransportAction.java", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/DataTiersUsageTransportActionTests.java"] | Data tiers usage is 0 for partially mounted indices | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.1.2
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
ESS on Azure
### Problem Description
The `_xpack/usage` API reports the size of the data set per data tier. However, it uses the local disk size as the metric it reports on and this is 0 (zero) for partially mounted indices, hiding the size of the data set mounted on the frozen tier.
We should switch to using the `total_data_set_size` metric that was introduced when we added the frozen tier/partially mounted indices.
### Steps to Reproduce
Mount a partially mounted index on a dedicated frozen tier. Use the `_xpack/usage` API and see that no (or very little) data is reported on frozen tier.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86055 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86580 | 7db1c807f2deb764e6519f8b47ea5713f27b5a13 | d5a45867bcce65eb8251576bd0c18a36736bb296 | "2022-04-21T06:49:19Z" | java | "2022-05-12T15:25:48Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,044 | ["docs/changelog/86458.yaml", "docs/reference/search/search-vector-tile-api.asciidoc", "rest-api-spec/src/main/resources/rest-api-spec/api/search_mvt.json", "x-pack/plugin/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/vector-tile/10_basic.yml", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/javaRestTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/VectorTileRestIT.java", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/rest/RestVectorTileAction.java", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/rest/VectorTileRequest.java", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/rest/VectorTileRequestTests.java"] | Add label features to vector tile search API response | ### Description
There are [2 labeling issues in Kibana when using Vector tiles](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/130675).
1) Multiple labels for MultiPolygon and MultiLineString geometries.
<img width="500" alt="Screen Shot 2022-04-20 at 9 32 26 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/373691/164268037-0d6088f3-5bd6-4e0e-9541-d551091af843.png">
2) Multiple labels for features that span tiles. For example, hexagons that span tile boundaries.
<img width="500" alt="Screen Shot 2022-04-20 at 9 35 52 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/373691/164268658-dfdd6b0e-10b7-46da-a1e9-15e99044fc38.png">
The recommended solution is to provide features for labels, where the feature geometry is the label location.
To resolve these issues, I propose adding a new parameter, `withLabels`, to `_mvt` API that when `true` would add label features to the response. Label features could be added in 2 ways
1) another layer, "label", in the response. The "label" layer will contain Point feature for each hit and agg feature. For agg features, the Point feature will be the center of the hexagon. For hit features, the Point feature will be the centroid of the largest polygon for MultiPolygon and the centroid for the longest line for MultiLineString.
2) Include label feature in existing "hits" and "aggs" layers. Give label feature a property like "__EsIsLabelFeature" so filter expressions can be used exclude features in style rules.
Kibana is creating these centroid features today for GeoJSON sources. Kibana includes label features in GeoJSON feature collection and uses filters to exclude features in style rules (option 2 above)
cc @jsanz @thomasneirynck | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86044 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86458 | acc22de4fd6ec6a5f11ac6afb981fd261eda7af4 | db08d619989a3e9e67aff376239ef8e35a010eed | "2022-04-20T15:42:12Z" | java | "2022-05-17T13:33:29Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 86,041 | ["client/rest/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/client/RestClient.java", "client/rest/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/client/RestClientMultipleHostsIntegTests.java", "docs/changelog/87248.yaml"] | Low level rest client retrying scrolls, skipping pages | ### Elasticsearch Version
Doesn't matter
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
all
### OS Version
doesn't matter
### Problem Description
When you send a `scroll` request to the low level rest client it uses it's standard retry mechanism which catches all errors and just retries against another ES instance. The trouble with that is that you *can't* retry a scroll - it generally consumes state on the server and moves to the next page.
### Steps to Reproduce
Scroll with low level rest client.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/86041 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87248 | ddcaff0cbbba2166d22caf94b4738d80ca62cbfc | 4d2929bb281fb984c0176a59f76a886552b95ff7 | "2022-04-20T13:52:46Z" | java | "2022-05-31T14:48:41Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,992 | ["build-tools-internal/src/main/resources/forbidden/jdk-deprecated.txt"] | Build fails with JDK 18 - Method not found while parsing signature: java.awt.color.ICC_Profile#finalize() | ```
$./gradlew precommit
...
FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':client:client-benchmark-noop-api-plugin:forbiddenApisMain'.
> Parsing signatures failed: Method not found while parsing signature: java.awt.color.ICC_Profile#finalize()
...
Publishing build scan...
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/rhm5f4imnnae2
```
JDK 18 removed a number of deprecated-for-removal empty finalize() in java.desktop module, see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273103
The jdk-deprecated forbidden APIs list should be updated to reflect this.
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85992 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85994 | af7525e1f05bfb0168bbc17f2acc7d1844944998 | 6532032dd94a1a4a8a97976f15d4b496839ad961 | "2022-04-19T10:07:50Z" | java | "2022-04-22T18:51:09Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,946 | ["docs/reference/analysis/tokenfilters/keep-types-tokenfilter.asciidoc"] | Keyword tokenizer + keep_types filter causing empty string to be returned as only token | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.1.2
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
latest linux docker version
### Problem Description
Using a custom analyzer with the tokenizer set to "keyword", and putting a "keep_types" filter in it, result in no tokens.
This should return a single token of "1234567890", but instead it returns just an empty string: ""
If I replace the tokenizer with 'standard', I get the correct token back: "1234567890"
Changing the types to ALPHANUM and/or changing the text to include letters, words, or spaces, all still result in an empty string returned.
It is important to me to use the keyword tokenizer instead of the standard tokenizer because I want only 1 token (the entire string) being passed to all the filters. Using the standard tokenizer would result in a string like "1234 AB 56789" being turned into 3 tokens before it gets passed to the filters, which I don't want.
### Steps to Reproduce
`POST _analyze`
```json
{
"tokenizer": "keyword",
"filter": [
{
"type": "keep_types",
"types": [
"<NUM>"
]
}
],
"text": "1234567890"
}
```
Returns an empty token instead of "1234567890"
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85946 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87553 | 29460adf7e2863d2deb2e4ee2791a01e401f5fdc | b5a635cae9e056a25df0cc694e8abf58a7199fad | "2022-04-16T10:12:01Z" | java | "2022-06-13T09:28:32Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,879 | ["build-tools-internal/build.gradle", "client/test/build.gradle", "test/framework/build.gradle"] | [CI] RoleReferenceIntersectionTests testBuildRoleForListOfRoleReferences failing | Looks like an issue with Mockito on Java 19 when trying to use `thenCalRealMethod()` on an interface default method. Looks like there was a similar regression with Java 17: https://github.com/mockito/mockito/issues/2587
Looks like the latest byte buddy release (1.12.9) supports Java 19 so it might just be a case of bumping that?
**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/cqspj36nvbq3w/tests/:x-pack:plugin:core:test/org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.security.authz.store.RoleReferenceIntersectionTests/testBuildRoleForListOfRoleReferences
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:core:test' --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.security.authz.store.RoleReferenceIntersectionTests.testBuildRoleForListOfRoleReferences" -Dtests.seed=59168229211915B9 -Dtests.locale=sr-BA -Dtests.timezone=Pacific/Port_Moresby -Druntime.java=19`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
Didn't try
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.security.authz.store.RoleReferenceIntersectionTests&tests.test=testBuildRoleForListOfRoleReferences
**Failure excerpt:**
```
org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException:
Cannot call abstract real method on java object!
Calling real methods is only possible when mocking non abstract method.
//correct example:
when(mockOfConcreteClass.nonAbstractMethod()).thenCallRealMethod();
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([59168229211915B9:66D3411D71C06407]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.security.authz.store.RoleReferenceIntersection.lambda$buildRole$0(RoleReferenceIntersection.java:45)
at org.elasticsearch.action.ActionListener$2.onResponse(ActionListener.java:162)
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.GroupedActionListener.onResponse(GroupedActionListener.java:55)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.security.authz.store.RoleReferenceIntersectionTests.lambda$testBuildRoleForListOfRoleReferences$1(RoleReferenceIntersectionTests.java:62)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.security.authz.store.RoleReferenceIntersection.lambda$buildRole$1(RoleReferenceIntersection.java:50)
at java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1511)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.security.authz.store.RoleReferenceIntersection.buildRole(RoleReferenceIntersection.java:50)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.security.authz.store.RoleReferenceIntersectionTests.testBuildRoleForListOfRoleReferences(RoleReferenceIntersectionTests.java:66)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:578)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:828)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85879 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85881 | e307f3222f89e00bf82a008757b5e7eb05a2e3e9 | 0b999c399eb282efa151df116c78eeec3e616e4f | "2022-04-13T21:05:51Z" | java | "2022-04-14T20:19:19Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,851 | ["docs/reference/eql/eql.asciidoc", "docs/reference/modules/indices/circuit_breaker.asciidoc", "docs/reference/settings/ml-settings.asciidoc"] | [DOCS] Consolidate CircuitBreakers | 👋🏼 I see most CircuitBreakers returned via [GET Node Stats](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/cluster-nodes-stats.html) `GET _nodes/stats?filter_path=nodes.*.breakers` (v7.17.2, v8.1.2) are listed in the main Elasticsearch [CircuitBreaker Doc](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/circuit-breaker.html). However, the following are randomly scattered with their parent topic instead of consolidated with the rest.
- [`eql_sequence`](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/eql.html#eql-circuit-breaker)
- [`model_inference`](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/ml-settings.html#model-inference-circuit-breaker)
Would y'all consider consolidating these from their topics (still referenced/linked) into the main Circuit Breaker page to ease discoverability? 🙏🏼 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85851 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/90809 | bd97e2bca06c9f524ea359aecb0d848308f6abc7 | 34ff7a9d98a80e15ca25e6707153be7c45efa9e4 | "2022-04-13T02:28:15Z" | java | "2022-10-14T11:33:52Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,829 | ["docs/changelog/85830.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/routing/allocation/ShardsAvailabilityHealthIndicatorService.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/health/HealthIndicatorImpact.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/health/ImpactArea.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/routing/allocation/ShardsAvailabilityHealthIndicatorServiceTests.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/health/HealthIndicatorResultTests.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/health/HealthIndicatorServiceTests.java"] | Add `impact_areas` field to impacts | eg
```
"impacts": [
{
"severity": 3,
"description": "Searches might return slower than usual. Fewer redundant copies of the data exist on 2 indices [.ds-logslogslogs-2022.03.29-000001, my-index-000001].",
"impact_areas": [ "search" ]
}
]
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85829 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85830 | 4f58cf24f819f162ad2ec286c4bc2f6b956339f9 | 02fc46a9a226cb0c16faa60db4f818af1a4fca9b | "2022-04-12T16:50:39Z" | java | "2022-04-13T07:36:50Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,806 | ["x-pack/plugin/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/deprecation/10_basic.yml"] | [CI] XPackRestIT test {p0=deprecation/10_basic/Test Deprecations} failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/hfmf3gkkdknhw/tests/:x-pack:plugin:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT/test%20%7Bp0=deprecation%2F10_basic%2FTest%20Deprecations%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT.test {p0=deprecation/10_basic/Test Deprecations}" -Dtests.seed=5DAF017ED17971B0 -Dtests.locale=de -Dtests.timezone=Pacific/Guam -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master, 8.2, 8.1
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT&tests.test=test%20%7Bp0%3Ddeprecation/10_basic/Test%20Deprecations%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [deprecation/10_basic:13]: field [node_settings] doesn't have length [0]
Expected: <0>
but: was <1>
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([5DAF017ED17971B0:D5FB3EA47F851C48]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:493)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor14.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: field [node_settings] doesn't have length [0]
Expected: <0>
but: was <1>
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.LengthAssertion.doAssert(LengthAssertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:482)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor14.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85806 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86141 | a8f14599e9be9afdfafa9169abea809a378e954a | 2a8c5a63bab3ac5f056f3a987013a4bdf6babab0 | "2022-04-12T08:59:00Z" | java | "2022-04-25T15:22:39Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,803 | ["docs/changelog/85817.yaml", "plugins/discovery-gce/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cloud/gce/GceInstancesServiceImpl.java"] | Discovery GCE test fails on FIPS | ### CI Link
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/mcboq4te6p7o6
### Repro line
./gradlew :plugins:discovery-gce:qa:gce:check -Dtests.fips.enabled=true
### Does it reproduce?
Yes
### Applicable branches
master
### Failure history
_No response_
### Failure excerpt
This seems to have started failing since #85132
```
[2022-04-12T17:07:29,829][WARN ][o.e.c.g.GceInstancesServiceImpl] [yamlRestTest-1] unable to resolve default zone from metadata server for GCE discovery service
java.security.KeyStoreException: Uninitialized keystore
at java.security.KeyStore.size(KeyStore.java:1296) ~[?:?]
at org.bouncycastle.jsse.provider.ProvTrustManagerFactorySpi.getTrustAnchors(ProvTrustManagerFactorySpi.java:227) ~[bctls-fips-1.0.9.jar:1.0.9]
at org.bouncycastle.jsse.provider.ProvTrustManagerFactorySpi.engineInit(ProvTrustManagerFactorySpi.java:163) ~[bctls-fips-1.0.9.jar:1.0.9]
at javax.net.ssl.TrustManagerFactory.init(TrustManagerFactory.java:282) ~[?:?]
at com.google.api.client.util.SslUtils.initSslContext(SslUtils.java:107) ~[google-http-client-1.41.1.jar:1.41.1]
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85803 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85817 | 1045686698fece318e5ee0e06c3b40c5c7a869a9 | b841b5f7d55651e9edd35bddf4d0205b5c6cd696 | "2022-04-12T07:28:23Z" | java | "2022-04-13T08:57:37Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,824 | ["docs/reference/setup/install/targz.asciidoc", "docs/reference/setup/install/zip-windows.asciidoc"] | Path /etc/elasticsearch/config/certs/http_ca.crt is wrong when trying to verify Elasticsearch is running | https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/rpm.html#rpm-running-systemd
<img width="909" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8455957/162904178-7e2ec692-52eb-4c5a-bd62-42b69b888193.png">
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85824 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86390 | ce9819fa6cc1aed8d52a09ec28503487e25bb6f8 | 6ebe562c5b1f46d6b07e3f78d4752f833ed4c457 | "2022-04-12T07:24:30Z" | java | "2022-05-03T13:06:25Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,790 | ["docs/changelog/85926.yaml", "modules/ingest-common/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/ingest/common/ScriptProcessor.java", "modules/ingest-common/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/ingest/190_script_processor.yml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/ingest/IngestService.java"] | Reduce script processor overhead from safety check | Currently 99% of a profiled `script` processor's execution time comes from the invocation of `CollectionUtils.ensureNoSelfReferences()`, not the script itself (this could vary with script intensity, but it stands to reason it would take a lot to change this dramatically).
<img width="2552" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7477841/162812089-a8d9f023-abf5-4249-b676-78b2adc459a1.png">
1. Is there another way we could approach this self-reference guard rail? It's not completely fool-proof but after the first document passes this check we can be reasonably sure the Script doesn't cause self-references, except in the case of some very specific conditional behavior one would almost have to intentionally code in. As this measure is to help users prevent shooting themselves in the foot, an ostensible 100x overhead is too high a cost, surely.
2. As a half-measure, should we not execute the check if the processor has `ignore_errors` set to `true` anyway? This is the case even for some published integrations, and could benefit greatly from the reduced overhead. It's not ideal as this particular problem really should probably not be ignored since it will cause issues in a later step, but this would preserve existing behavior and reduce cost. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85790 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85926 | 6aeec65d69b7be80439b24dd02d0a462fa7f1066 | 4b286d7aa6063b5c9f8ae66ef6a3c0d1ed389138 | "2022-04-11T19:15:36Z" | java | "2022-05-02T17:38:35Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,756 | ["docs/changelog/85792.yaml", "modules/ingest-geoip/qa/full-cluster-restart/build.gradle", "modules/ingest-geoip/qa/full-cluster-restart/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/ingest/geoip/FullClusterRestartIT.java", "modules/ingest-geoip/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/ingest/geoip/DatabaseNodeService.java", "modules/ingest-geoip/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/ingest/geoip/GeoIpDownloaderTaskExecutor.java", "modules/ingest-geoip/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/ingest/geoip/DatabaseNodeServiceTests.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/IndexAbstraction.java", "test/fixtures/geoip-fixture/docker-compose.yml"] | GeoIP Ingest plugin should be not break with feature migration | ### Bug
It is possible for a system feature migration to break the geoip-ingest plugin on a cluster that has been upgraded from 7.17 to 8.x. The system features migration will reindex the `.geoip_databases` index into a new index called `.geoip_databases-reindexed-for-8`, then delete the original `.geoip_databases` index and replace it with an alias. The plugin is written to expect `.geoip_databases` to be a concrete index, so it fails to reload its database, and geoip ingest processors stop working.
We need to fix the code so that running a system feature migration doesn't create this problem.
### Reproducing
Steps to reproduce:
1. On a 7.17 cluster, [create a pipeline with a geoip processor](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/geoip-processor.html).
2. Upgrade the cluster to 8.1.
3. Run a [system features migration](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/feature-migration-api.html) and wait for it to complete.
4. Wait for the geoip-ingest plugin to reload its databases, or restart the cluster to make changes take effect
5. Ingest a document using the pipeline.
Here are some curl commands I used on my local, single-node cluster:
<details><summary>Expand for details</summary>
```
# ON 7.17 - create geoip processor
curl -s -XPUT -H'content-type:application/json' \
'localhost:9200/_ingest/pipeline/geoip' \
-d '{"description":"test","processors":[{"geoip":{"field":"ip"}}]}'
curl -s -XPUT -H'content-type:application/json' \
'localhost:9200/my-index-00001/_doc/pre_migration?pipeline=geoip' \
-d '{"ip":"8.8.8.8"}'
curl -s -XGET 'localhost:9200/my-index-00001/_doc/pre_migration'
# ON 7.17 - create snapshot
curl -s -XPUT -H'content-type:application/json' \
'localhost:9200/_snapshot/fs_backup' \
-d '{"type":"fs","settings":{"location":"/Users/wbrafford/work/es-builds/snapshots"}}'
curl -s -XPUT -H'content-type:application/json' \
'localhost:9200/_snapshot/fs_backup/pre_migration' \
-d '{"indices":"-*","feature_states":["geoip"],"include_global_state":false}'
# ON 8.1 - run feature migration
curl -s -XPOST 'localhost:9200/_migration/system_features'
# ON 8.1 - restart and test doc
curl -s -XPUT -H'content-type:application/json' \
'localhost:9200/my-index-00001/_doc/post_migration?pipeline=geoip' \
-d '{"ip":"8.8.8.8"}'
curl -s -XGET 'localhost:9200/my-index-00001/_doc/post_migration'
# restore snapshot
curl -s -XPOST -H'content-type:application/json' \
'localhost:9200/_snapshot/fs_backup/pre_migration/_restore' \
-d '{"indices":"-*","feature_states":["geoip"],"include_global_state":false}'
curl -s -XPUT -H'content-type:application/json' \
'localhost:9200/my-index-00001/_doc/post_restore?pipeline=geoip' \
-d '{"ip":"8.8.8.8"}'
curl -s -XGET 'localhost:9200/my-index-00001/_doc/post_restore'
```
</details>
### Workaround
The only fix I know of is to restore a geoip feature state from a snapshot taken before the system feature migration:
```
POST /_snapshot/<repo_name>/<snapshot_name>/_restore
{
"indices": "-*",
"feature_states": ["geoip"],
"include_global_state": false
}
```
It doesn't really matter how old the snapshot is, because once the plugin is restored to a good state, it can update the geoip index.
### Open questions
What approach should we take to fix this?
1. The `.geoip_databases` index doesn't contain any user data. We could just "migrate" it by deleting it and recreating it. This kind of fix would be the responsibility of the core-infra team.
2. We could make the geoip ingest plugin robust for the case where `.geoip_databases` is an alias, not a concrete index. This doesn't seem like something the plugin needs intrinsically, but it might be easier to do than changing the migration code.
We should also look at giving users a more convenient way to reset the state of the geoip-ingest plugin. https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/70426 would have been really useful to have for this bug.
cc @dakrone, @gwbrown, @joegallo | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85756 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85792 | a30ab8649547e5694bcd66d171ccd5cd5779f183 | cfe1f111475a09fffd0a4d208463dcb58fc70226 | "2022-04-07T21:27:31Z" | java | "2022-05-03T19:47:32Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,748 | ["docs/changelog/89199.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/spatial/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/spatial/search/aggregations/InternalGeoLine.java", "x-pack/plugin/spatial/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/spatial/search/aggregations/GeoLineAggregatorTests.java"] | GeoLine aggregation can output corrupt geojson: a line with just 1 point | Reproduction (from the docs, but removed 2 of the 3 docs):
```
PUT test
{
"mappings": {
"dynamic": "strict",
"_source": {
"enabled": false
},
"properties": {
"my_location": {
"type": "geo_point"
},
"group": {
"type": "keyword"
},
"@timestamp": {
"type": "date"
}
}
}
}
POST /test/_bulk?refresh
{"index": {}}
{"my_location": {"lat":37.3450570, "lon": -122.0499820}, "@timestamp": "2013-09-06T16:00:36"}
POST /test/_search?filter_path=aggregations
{
"aggs": {
"line": {
"geo_line": {
"point": {"field": "my_location"},
"sort": {"field": "@timestamp"}
}
}
}
}
```
This reports:
```
"geometry" : {
"coordinates" : [
[
-122.049982,
37.345057
]
],
"type" : "LineString"
},
```
which is invalid as a line should have at least 2 points, e.g. elasticsearch errors if you try to index a line with just 1 point.
If you use the geo-line aggregation in a transform, transform fails if it stumbles upon such a document.
It seems to me that the geo-line aggregation should not report these points or it should report it as points. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85748 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/89199 | 08fb6ed6923fec089b2eb3eff2a39276491937f6 | cd359b3d3993c034d8f4fe4296afcea2247cf8c4 | "2022-04-07T14:24:37Z" | java | "2022-08-09T13:07:22Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,747 | ["x-pack/plugin/security/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/authc/service/ElasticServiceAccounts.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/action/service/TransportGetServiceAccountActionTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/authc/service/ServiceAccountServiceTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/service_accounts/10_basic.yml"] | [Fleet] Create new service account `elastic/fleet-server-remote` for remote agent connections | ### Description
**Background**
As part of https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/104986 we will be adding the ability for Elastic Agents to send agent monitoring data to a remote Elasticsearch cluster. In order to achieve this, we will need a service token for the remote cluster which fleet server will use.
This service account will need less permissions than the `elastic/fleet-server` as integration data will not be sent to remote clusters yet.
**Service Account Details**
Name: `elastic/fleet-server-remote`
Permissions:
- for indices `logs-*`, `metrics-*` privileges "write", "create_index", "auto_configure"
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85747 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/100950 | 3ce905b75432e36648ae013a3580b1f12537cae9 | 63179d760adbb7b202d49150e1ee9c4fcb193b9e | "2022-04-07T13:44:46Z" | java | "2023-10-18T13:35:51Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,725 | ["docs/changelog/86192.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/searchable-snapshots/preallocate/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/searchablesnapshots/preallocate/Preallocate.java"] | Windows bwcTestSnapshots unable to upgrade a node due to assertion failing | ### CI Link
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/vn4gmfzui5s3q
### Repro line
NONE
### Does it reproduce?
Didn't try
### Applicable branches
master, 8.2
### Failure history
_No response_
### Failure excerpt
```
java.lang.AssertionError: expected file size 16777216 but was 0 |
-- | --
| » at org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.cache.shared.SharedBytes.<init>(SharedBytes.java:64) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.cache.shared.FrozenCacheService.<init>(FrozenCacheService.java:295) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.xpack.searchablesnapshots.SearchableSnapshots.createComponents(SearchableSnapshots.java:339) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.node.Node.lambda$new$16(Node.java:685) |
| » at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:273) |
| » at java.base/java.util.AbstractList$RandomAccessSpliterator.forEachRemaining(AbstractList.java:720) |
| » at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509) |
| » at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499) |
| » at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:575) |
| » at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluateToArrayNode(AbstractPipeline.java:260) |
| » at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.toArray(ReferencePipeline.java:616) |
| » at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.toArray(ReferencePipeline.java:622) |
| » at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.toList(ReferencePipeline.java:627) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.node.Node.<init>(Node.java:699) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.node.Node.<init>(Node.java:291) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.bootstrap.Bootstrap$5.<init>(Bootstrap.java:234) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.bootstrap.Bootstrap.setup(Bootstrap.java:234) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.bootstrap.Bootstrap.init(Bootstrap.java:358) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.bootstrap.Elasticsearch.init(Elasticsearch.java:166) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.bootstrap.Elasticsearch.execute(Elasticsearch.java:157) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.common.cli.EnvironmentAwareCommand.execute(EnvironmentAwareCommand.java:81) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.cli.Command.mainWithoutErrorHandling(Command.java:112) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.cli.Command.main(Command.java:77) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.bootstrap.Elasticsearch.main(Elasticsearch.java:122) |
| » at org.elasticsearch.bootstrap.Elasticsearch.main(Elasticsearch.java:80)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85725 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86192 | 1e3ad0d3548fe4eb49014c55cbf59762d514e0cd | 71c4c68c6e17b3b3d0e191647748dc51a467304c | "2022-04-06T13:28:18Z" | java | "2022-04-28T07:48:26Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,711 | ["docs/changelog/85713.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/timeseries/TimeSeriesIndexSearcher.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/timeseries/TimeSeriesIndexSearcherTests.java"] | TSDB:TimeSeriesIndexSearcher collect order error, caused by the wrong init value of tsidOrd | ### Elasticsearch Version
master
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
all
### Problem Description
TimeSeriesIndexSearcher use the tsidOrd to speed up tsid compare. There is a hidden bug:
The init value of tsidOrd is 0, so it's ok to collect data from beginning. But if collect data from the middle, the tsidOrd has a wrong init value. It will cause the PriorityQueue pop the wrong LeafWalker.
### Steps to Reproduce
Create 2 segments IndexWriter, And the first segment is:
|_tsid|@timestamp|
| ---- | ---- |
|tsid1|1|
|tsid2|11|
|tsid2|10|
|tsid3|1|
the second segment is:
|_tsid|timestamp|
| ---- | ---- |
|tsid1|1|
|tsid2|21|
|tsid2|20|
|tsid3|1|
the query is _tsid : tsid2 OR _tsid : tsid3
the current order is : tsid2/21 -> tsid2/11 -> tsid2/20 -> tsid2/10 -> tsid3/1 -> tsid3/1.
The right order is : tsid2/21 -> tsid2/20 -> tsid2/11 -> tsid2/10 -> tsid3/1 -> tsid3/1.
The reason is in
```
boolean shouldPop() throws IOException {
if (tsidOrd == -1) {
tsidOrd = tsids.ordValue();
} else if (tsidOrd != tsids.ordValue()) {
tsidOrd = tsids.ordValue();
return true;
}
return false;
}
```
the tsidOrd init value is 0, But the first tsidOrd value of this query is 1. So It pop the second segment unexpected.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85711 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85713 | a372b543f5b14a11c4b970a81a9dfadc25a3e1f9 | 1739dab88b41d60c0648c3722688af9a9d944ab9 | "2022-04-06T08:11:39Z" | java | "2022-04-13T11:46:07Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,707 | ["build-tools-internal/src/main/resources/templates/breaking-changes.asciidoc"] | Missing breaking changes section in release docs | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.2.0
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
MacOS
### Problem Description
Generating the release notes with the `generateReleaseNotes` Gradle tasks results in the documentation missing the `breaking changes` section. As a result of this the reference
```
Also see <<breaking-changes-8.2,Breaking changes in 8.2>>.
```
in file
```
docs/reference/release-notes/8.2.0.asciidoc
```
is broken.
### Steps to Reproduce
Run the Gradle task to generate the docs.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85707 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86343 | 0f43267a84736cd6789a5e625b963800d83592b9 | 746218f81a4a1fffdb6d7da77004d65caeb6c2db | "2022-04-05T17:40:13Z" | java | "2022-05-02T12:39:00Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,702 | ["server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/indices/ShardLimitValidator.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/indices/ShardLimitValidatorTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/deprecation/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/deprecation/ClusterDeprecationChecks.java", "x-pack/plugin/deprecation/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/deprecation/DeprecationChecks.java", "x-pack/plugin/deprecation/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/deprecation/ClusterDeprecationChecksTests.java"] | Emit critical deprecation warning if maximum open shards exceeded | Similar to https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/82807 Kibana upgrades can never succeed if a cluster already exceeded the maximum open shards.
It would reduce the downtime and help our users safely upgrade if we emitted a critical warning from the deprecations info API for this condition. At the moment it will only help users upgrading from 7.x to 8.x but we hope to enable the upgrade assistant during minor upgrades too https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/117220 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85702 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85967 | 051f9713e99381faaaf88ce1a0bc690f4fab0b40 | 192b4ca8595ee7227f681b33f4d68d49cfbfeca4 | "2022-04-05T15:25:58Z" | java | "2022-05-06T13:03:49Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,670 | ["rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/indices.forcemerge/10_basic.yml"] | [CI] ClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=nodes.stats/11_indices_metrics/Metric - blank for indices shard_stats} failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/i5xx5nbqxywse/tests/:rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=nodes.stats%2F11_indices_metrics%2FMetric%20-%20blank%20for%20indices%20shard_stats%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT" -Dtests.method="test {yaml=nodes.stats/11_indices_metrics/Metric - blank for indices shard_stats}" -Dtests.seed=14ACC78448D937FD -Dtests.locale=ru-RU -Dtests.timezone=Europe/Ljubljana -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
8.2
**Reproduces locally?:**
Didn't try
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dnodes.stats/11_indices_metrics/Metric%20-%20blank%20for%20indices%20shard_stats%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [nodes.stats/11_indices_metrics:338]:
Expected: <0>
but: was <1>
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([14ACC78448D937FD:9CF8F85EE6255A05]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:493)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError:
Expected: <0>
but: was <1>
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:923)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.MatchAssertion.doAssert(MatchAssertion.java:99)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:482)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85670 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85683 | 378736ac320afe5d4d82fcfb38e196346d63ca5b | 92852f3eac3c6dfe7689c61a5a852aba1d6ecb07 | "2022-04-04T09:51:35Z" | java | "2022-04-04T21:26:52Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,640 | ["qa/verify-version-constants/build.gradle"] | [CI] Verify version constants failing on pre-8.0 clusters with FIPS enabled | This looks to have been failing for awhile. https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/2zxpfgsfn4s5k/failure
```
:qa:verify-version-constants:v7.17.3#integTest FAILED
Exec output and error:
| Output for ./bin/elasticsearch-users:
| ERROR: Only PBKDF2 is allowed for password hashing in a FIPS 140 JVM. Please set the appropriate value for [ xpack.security.authc.password_hashing.algorithm ] setting.
```
It's possible here this is an issue with _any_ BWC tests against 7.17 clusters as it seems we've changed some stuff related to FIPS between now and then? | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85640 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86079 | 09ce1b0fe8b80e13b927a0d74449eb33b30f22b7 | 557398d28bd120b604db60ec038538cffb06cacf | "2022-04-01T17:42:29Z" | java | "2022-04-25T12:06:57Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,634 | ["distribution/docker/src/docker/Dockerfile", "docs/changelog/87812.yaml"] | Remove vim-tiny package from Docker image | For reasons that are unclear, we install the `vim-tiny` package in the Elasticsearch Docker image. Whilst convenient, this package is not actually necessary, therefore we should remove it. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85634 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87812 | f6bfd5c87c27107ea2ffe128f2bfbf7d77afd98e | cb70dac01609fc4865343cc0c6514b837129092e | "2022-04-01T16:22:47Z" | java | "2022-06-21T09:22:18Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,610 | ["docs/reference/troubleshooting/common-issues/circuit-breaker-errors.asciidoc", "docs/reference/troubleshooting/common-issues/disk-usage-exceeded.asciidoc", "docs/reference/troubleshooting/common-issues/high-cpu-usage.asciidoc", "docs/reference/troubleshooting/common-issues/high-jvm-memory-pressure.asciidoc", "docs/reference/troubleshooting/common-issues/red-yellow-cluster-status.asciidoc", "docs/reference/troubleshooting/common-issues/rejected-requests.asciidoc", "docs/reference/troubleshooting/common-issues/task-queue-backlog.asciidoc", "docs/reference/troubleshooting/fix-common-cluster-issues.asciidoc"] | [DOCS] Split the page Fix common cluster issues into separate pages | The page [Fix common cluster issues](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch//reference/master/fix-common-cluster-issues.html) is one of the [troubleshooting links](https://github.com/elastic/cloud/issues/92183#issuecomment-1017303716) that are going to be created on the deployment health banner to link error messages to relevant doc pages.
This page is too long and requires lots of scrolling. We can get a better user experience if we:
- link from the UI to the specific sections of this page
or
- split the page into separate pages (better for SEO)
CC @debadair
Relates to https://github.com/elastic/cloud/issues/92183 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85610 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/88495 | 5191a16e5c03dbd7b98188c9e4ca7a11a05254a5 | 26cc87360ebbd3fbd5100a26a36f6a948f4e826e | "2022-04-01T11:05:06Z" | java | "2022-07-18T15:54:02Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,592 | ["docs/changelog/85595.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/javaRestTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/VectorTileRestIT.java", "x-pack/plugin/vector-tile/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/vectortile/rest/RestVectorTileAction.java"] | Wildcards in fields parameter are not supported in vector tile search API | Currently if you add a field in the fields parameter with a wildcard, no fields will be added to the hits layer. The situation is even worst if the wildcard matches the field name of the geo_point or geo_shape field, in that case a ClassCastException is thrown. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85592 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85595 | 3381fcd6d778bd6ecc74df22c9b4adeb2966825d | 2b0a1a3e7ad1556f8789035a2dda07efc8852858 | "2022-04-01T05:43:58Z" | java | "2022-04-01T11:59:18Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,550 | ["docs/changelog/85551.yaml", "server/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/repositories/InvalidRepositoryIT.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/repositories/InvalidRepository.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/repositories/RepositoriesService.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/repositories/UnknownTypeRepository.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/repositories/InvalidRepositoryTests.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/repositories/RepositoriesServiceTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/repository-encrypted/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/repositories/encrypted/EncryptedRepositorySecretIntegTests.java"] | NPE in RepositoriesService | ### Elasticsearch Version
7.16.2, master
### Installed Plugins
no
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Linux iZbp1dn0ktfed9mjoyuiajZ 5.10.84-10.2.al8.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Feb 10 15:03:09 CST 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
### Problem Description
When put repository using PutRespository API for an existing repository, NullPointerException was thrown, short stack shows as below
```
1> java.lang.Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "org.elasticsearch.repositories.Repository.getMetadata()" because "repository" is null
1> at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.MasterService.innerExecuteTasks(MasterService.java:916) ~[main/:?]
1> at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.MasterService.executeTasks(MasterService.java:871) ~[main/:?]
1> at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.MasterService.runTasks(MasterService.java:253) [main/:?]
1> at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.MasterService$Batcher.run(MasterService.java:153) [main/:?]
1> at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.TaskBatcher.runIfNotProcessed(TaskBatcher.java:114) [main/:?]
1> at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.TaskBatcher$BatchedTask.run(TaskBatcher.java:170) [main/:?]
1> at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.ThreadContext$ContextPreservingRunnable.run(ThreadContext.java:714) [main/:?]
1> at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor$TieBreakingPrioritizedRunnable.runAndClean(PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor.java:260) [main/:?]
1> at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor$TieBreakingPrioritizedRunnable.run(PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor.java:223) [main/:?]
1> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136) [?:?]
1> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) [?:?]
1> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833) [?:?]
```
### Steps to Reproduce
I've created an IT to reproduce this issue in [#85551](https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85551), steps can be described as following:
- put repository using `RestPutRepository` API and make sure non-master node failed to create repository.
- restart master let one of the previous non-master node become master
- put the same repository using the `RestPutRepository` API.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85550 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85551 | 737eacee2db466fd4a3f293b84779ade4b24401d | 133e34dcca86ba5a754aadf8a19fef44af7b7475 | "2022-03-31T13:33:31Z" | java | "2022-04-04T15:35:53Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,539 | ["docs/changelog/85555.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/job/process/autodetect/output/AutodetectResultProcessor.java", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/job/process/normalizer/Renormalizer.java", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/job/process/normalizer/ShortCircuitingRenormalizer.java", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/job/process/autodetect/output/AutodetectResultProcessorTests.java"] | [ML] Renormalizer should not queue up quantiles docs but just keep the last | The short circuiting renormalizer used with ML anomaly detection will skip renormalizations if a more recent set of quantiles has been received. It does this by maintaining a queue of quantiles documents, but when it is ready to perform the next renormalization it drains the entire queue so that it is left with the most recent. When quantiles documents are large this is an inefficient use of memory. Instead of storing the full quantiles documents in a queue it should just retain the most recently added quantiles document. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85539 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85555 | 5914388fe3b90e670304b0f32c6ef18ad31bbb71 | 85359f3d551a977aa2df2ba6f1710c56111209c6 | "2022-03-31T10:55:19Z" | java | "2022-04-01T08:34:37Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,520 | ["docs/changelog/85531.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/sql/qa/mixed-node/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/sql/qa/mixed_node/SqlCompatIT.java"] | SQLCompatIT.testCursorFromOldNodeFailsOnNewNode fails after version bump to 8.3.0 | ### CI Link
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/vgdjkeiiridsk/tests/:x-pack:plugin:sql:qa:mixed-node:v8.2.0%23mixedClusterTest/org.elasticsearch.xpack.sql.qa.mixed_node.SqlCompatIT/testCursorFromOldNodeFailsOnNewNode?top-execution=1
### Repro line
./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:sql:qa:mixed-node:v8.2.0#mixedClusterTest' -Dtests.class="org.elasticsearch.xpack.sql.qa.mixed_node.SqlCompatIT" -Dtests.method="testCursorFromOldNodeFailsOnNewNode" -Dtests.seed=FDCF684F324DE11D -Dtests.bwc=true -Dtests.locale=es-PR -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Baku -Druntime.java=17
### Does it reproduce?
Yes
### Applicable branches
master
### Failure history
_No response_
### Failure excerpt
```
java.lang.AssertionError:
Expected: a string containing "Unsupported cursor version [8.2.0], expected [8.3.0]" |
but: was "method [POST], host [http://127.0.0.1:34941], URI [_sql], status line [HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error] |
{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"sql_illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Unsupported cursor version [1.66.82], expected [8.3.0]"}],"type":"sql_illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Unsupported cursor version [1.66.82], expected [8.3.0]"},"status":500}"
```
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85520 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85531 | 6da86a42d15fbbeb808127f3a47e715ac9094699 | 20f8a1fd206b44dd7cc3cb452fc259cce5035264 | "2022-03-31T05:08:44Z" | java | "2022-03-31T13:31:22Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,509 | ["docs/changelog/85534.yaml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/search.aggregation/360_date_histogram.yml"] | [CI] ClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=search.aggregation/360_date_histogram/Multi-value date histogram} failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/7xhn5whnmvexs/tests/:rest-api-spec:yamlRestTestV7CompatTest/org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=search.aggregation%2F360_date_histogram%2FMulti-value%20date%20histogram%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':rest-api-spec:yamlRestTestV7CompatTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT" -Dtests.method="test {yaml=search.aggregation/360_date_histogram/Multi-value date histogram}" -Dtests.seed=B09BA4416EA5068E -Dtests.locale=zh -Dtests.timezone=America/Ojinaga -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
Yes
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dsearch.aggregation/360_date_histogram/Multi-value%20date%20histogram%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [search.aggregation/360_date_histogram:235]:
Expected: <1>
but: was <0>
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([B09BA4416EA5068E:38CF9B9BC0596B76]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:493)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError:
Expected: <1>
but: was <0>
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:923)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.MatchAssertion.doAssert(MatchAssertion.java:99)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:482)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85509 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85534 | 4f9e09b03bf3007ce8de1ce5f46eda61f5929c9c | b4ff756beced1de35d355ed3ac200e27219722d2 | "2022-03-30T20:07:09Z" | java | "2022-03-31T10:54:44Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,493 | ["docs/changelog/85500.yaml", "docs/reference/search/search-your-data/highlighting.asciidoc", "modules/mapper-extras/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/match_only_text/10_basic.yml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/fetch/subphase/highlight/HighlightPhase.java"] | Highlighting in Kibana is not working for match_only_text | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.1.1.
### Installed Plugins
non
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
ESS
### Problem Description
When searching for any term in Kibana the highlighting works on any field type except `match_only_text` which has become the default field type in ~7.14 for all of the beats and Elastic Agent integrations.
E.g. here it does not work:
E.g. on 7.17 using text and keyword fields:
Discussed this with @romseygeek already. seems that the highlighter is not capeable of dealing with the specialized match_only_text field type.
### Steps to Reproduce
Index something using a `match_only_text` field.
Run a search on it. It should be highlighted.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85493 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85500 | 44e399b3a95e607f885fef85d0346166fd167e43 | 78789e2b5d1412165a892a9e39238b4260b3018b | "2022-03-30T11:24:48Z" | java | "2022-04-01T06:12:08Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,487 | ["modules/lang-mustache/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/script/mustache/MultiSearchTemplateIT.java", "modules/lang-mustache/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/script/mustache/SearchTemplateIT.java", "test/framework/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/FailBeforeCurrentVersionQueryBuilder.java"] | Improve error message for `ccs_force_fail` mode flag | ### Description
In #81809 we introduces a cluster setting that enables a pre-flight compatibility check for search requests going out from the coordinating node that checks if the request contains parts or features that are not supported on the previous minor version to quickly check full CCS compatibility for them. The error message the caller gets when e.g. using an aggregation that was just recently added could be improved. Currently the error message itself reads something like:
```
[class org.elasticsearch.action.search.SearchRequest] is not compatible with version 8.1.0 and the 'search.check_ccs_compatibility' setting is enabled.
```
The stack trace contains more information about e.g. the NamedWriteable that triggered the check to fail, but we might be able to surface more information in the error message itself. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85487 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/97059 | 42c2fa41da6c145f8de16b50900e973a6d9b665a | 84c295cbbd1fba0f67629ca887606376d91bae6b | "2022-03-30T09:27:18Z" | java | "2023-06-28T15:27:20Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,480 | ["docs/changelog/88292.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/node/DiscoveryNodeFilters.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ProactiveStorageIT.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ReactiveStorageIT.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ReactiveStorageDeciderService.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ReactiveStorageDeciderServiceTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/cluster/routing/allocation/DataTierAllocationDecider.java"] | Autoscaling may scale too far during index shrink | ### Elasticsearch Version
7.13.3
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
ubuntu
### Problem Description
When doing a shrink, a copy of each shard is first reallocated to the one node. Then a shrink is initiated, which generates new shards. In case the chosen node is above the low watermark now, the shrunk index cannot be allocated to the node. Currently, this can result in an unnecessary scale up when using autoscaling.
This relates to the work in #76206 in that fixing that one would reduce the risk of this occurring. We also have thoughts around retries in ILM to fix a stuck shrink. However, we would still need to ensure autoscaling would not scale up unnecessarily in this case (but still scale up if that is theonly way to ensure the shrink succeeds).
### Steps to Reproduce
NA
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85480 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/88292 | d4f78dbf792d7ee644f846f77604213758680cc0 | 66e750c01585b9785568125e9c56b9418fbf1a8a | "2022-03-30T06:36:31Z" | java | "2022-07-08T12:18:02Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,432 | ["docs/reference/searchable-snapshots/index.asciidoc"] | [Doc][Bug] Searchable snapshot doesn't have "recovered-" prefix but have "restored-" in 8.x | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.x
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
supported major OS
### Problem Description
In manual, there's such description
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.1/searchable-snapshots.html
> Indices managed by ILM are prefixed with `recovered-` when fully mounted.
Screenshot:
<details>
<img width="600" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/30574753/160521435-be0e0193-79b6-46e0-b30c-b8ebeb7bd784.png">
</details>
However, when testing the behavior, it's actually not using the prefix `recovered-`, but instead, it's using `restored-`.
<img width="700" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/30574753/160521823-d7c4b4af-29fb-4ffd-abdb-5fab4dbe3310.png">
---
The prefix `restored-` is the same as 7.x, which is mentioned below.
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/ilm-searchable-snapshot.html
Also additionally, the following page 8.x version also shows the correct spelling.
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.1/ilm-searchable-snapshot.html
---
Based on that, seemingly it's a simple typo when that line was added into the manual and it caused the confusion.
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.1/searchable-snapshots.html#searchable-snapshot-mount-storage-options
### Steps to Reproduce
as mentioned above.
Can we have someone double check if this is a simple doc typo please?
I am happy to file a doc fix PR but want to check about the tech part at first.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85432 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85457 | cc51c1a6396bd28b1410dd38a2f318b6c2bd8f5c | 42d007169672ee49695b28a337442716cffffdc1 | "2022-03-29T02:43:36Z" | java | "2022-03-29T15:02:26Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,409 | ["docs/changelog/85413.yaml", "docs/reference/transform/apis/put-transform.asciidoc", "docs/reference/transform/apis/start-transform.asciidoc", "x-pack/plugin/transform/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/transform/action/TransformPrivilegeChecker.java", "x-pack/plugin/transform/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/transform/action/TransformPrivilegeCheckerTests.java"] | [ML] Transform does not validate permissions appropriately when using a retention policy | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.0.0
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
n/a
### Problem Description
When creating a transform with a `retention_policy` configured, `delete` permissions are not validated against the destination index. Consequently, the transform may fail to run later once the retention policy attempts to run.
It should be validated and fail on creation (if validations are not skipped), just like we do for our other permissions.
Additionally, the documentation needs to reflect this permission nuance as right now `delete` is not mentioned.
### Steps to Reproduce
- create a transform with a retention policy with a user without delete permissions
- notice its failure
```
task encountered irrecoverable failure: org.elasticsearch.ElasticsearchSecurityException: action [indices:data/write/delete/byquery] is unauthorized for user [<username>] with roles [<roles>] on indices [<destination index>], this action is granted by the index privileges [delete,write,all]
```
Related issue: https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84941
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85409 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85413 | a5452603ccc91fe82d7f491ced34414014e08a1f | 5f03cab87e0bbd161a8fb44ebc561c79c6bc6747 | "2022-03-28T19:51:26Z" | java | "2022-03-29T11:54:31Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,400 | ["rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.allocation/10_basic.yml"] | [CI] ClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=cat.allocation/10_basic/Column headers} failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/z7i6ntwkqmto6/tests/:rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=cat.allocation%2F10_basic%2FColumn%20headers%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT" -Dtests.method="test {yaml=cat.allocation/10_basic/Column headers}" -Dtests.seed=A8D7E77577B84F59 -Dtests.locale=nl -Dtests.timezone=Antarctica/Rothera -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
8.1, master
**Reproduces locally?:**
Didn't try
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dcat.allocation/10_basic/Column%20headers%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [cat.allocation/10_basic:144]: field [$body] was expected to match the provided regex but didn't
Expected: ^ shards \s+
disk.indices \s+
disk.used \s+
disk.avail \s+
disk.total \s+
disk.percent \s+
host \s+
ip \s+
node
\n
( \s* #allow leading spaces to account for right-justified text
0 \s+
0b \s+
\d+(\.\d+)?[kmgt]?b \s+
(\d+(\.\d+)?[kmgt]b \s+) #always should return value since we filter out non data nodes by default
(\d+(\.\d+)?[kmgt]b \s+) #always should return value since we filter out non data nodes by default
(\d+ \s+) #always should return value since we filter out non data nodes by default
[-\w.]+ \s+
\d+(\.\d+){3} \s+
[-\w.]+
\n
)+
$
but: was "shards disk.indices disk.used disk.avail disk.total disk.percent host ip node\n 1 225b 8gb 39.1gb 47.2gb 17 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 yamlRestTest-0\n"
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A8D7E77577B84F59:2083D8AFD94422A1]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:489)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: field [$body] was expected to match the provided regex but didn't
Expected: ^ shards \s+
disk.indices \s+
disk.used \s+
disk.avail \s+
disk.total \s+
disk.percent \s+
host \s+
ip \s+
node
\n
( \s* #allow leading spaces to account for right-justified text
0 \s+
0b \s+
\d+(\.\d+)?[kmgt]?b \s+
(\d+(\.\d+)?[kmgt]b \s+) #always should return value since we filter out non data nodes by default
(\d+(\.\d+)?[kmgt]b \s+) #always should return value since we filter out non data nodes by default
(\d+ \s+) #always should return value since we filter out non data nodes by default
[-\w.]+ \s+
\d+(\.\d+){3} \s+
[-\w.]+
\n
)+
$
but: was "shards disk.indices disk.used disk.avail disk.total disk.percent host ip node\n 1 225b 8gb 39.1gb 47.2gb 17 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 yamlRestTest-0\n"
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.MatchAssertion.doAssert(MatchAssertion.java:64)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:478)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85400 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85459 | 50d1b4f129ce1e4f26dac5edf4507e15e4b2eb02 | dacb9a14e738073515ccaf2493b50f238edffea1 | "2022-03-28T15:52:03Z" | java | "2022-03-29T17:44:47Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,375 | ["docs/reference/settings/common-defs.asciidoc", "docs/reference/settings/security-settings.asciidoc", "docs/reference/settings/ssl-settings.asciidoc", "docs/reference/setup/install/docker/docker-compose.yml"] | `xpack.security.http.ssl.verification_mode` is missing from the docs | ### Description
- `xpack.security.http.ssl.verification_mode` is missing from the docs for 8.1. Reference https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.1/security-settings.html .
- But in fact this property exists, refer to the third point of `Resolution` in https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.1/trb-security-setup.html, but there is no place to set this property point to its meaning.
- 
- In conclusion, I hope https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.1/security-settings.html can provide a description of this property.
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85375 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/93083 | 693beaf8ce7db6d904c6cc0e8c0d73b52d391994 | 648d80e517e93f8631067d8c2e82bff0a1e297e2 | "2022-03-28T07:13:20Z" | java | "2023-01-19T16:13:55Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,357 | ["build-tools-internal/version.properties", "docs/changelog/85376.yaml"] | Upgrade Adoptium OpenJDK to 18.0.0+36 | Adoptium OpenJDK 18.0.0+36 is now available. We need to upgrade the version that is bundled with Elasticsearch to the newer version. We currently bundle 17.0.2+8. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85357 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85376 | e1882f8abf926f08287220cbfdff2e0e1edd4743 | 2da5d75ab8045b823fb7470da9b64e8bab9d1933 | "2022-03-25T10:00:59Z" | java | "2022-04-13T16:48:04Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,336 | ["docs/changelog/85340.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/plugins/PluginInfo.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/plugins/PluginInfoTests.java"] | Check for empty version while verifying Elasticsearch plugins | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.2
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Any
### Problem Description
The PluginInfo verification code in Elasticsearch ensures that plugins must match the Elasticsearch they are being installed into. However, if the plugin descriptor properties file contains an empty string, the Version.fromString call would simply return the latest Elasticsearch version.
The bug relates to the following code:
```
final String esVersionString = propsMap.remove("elasticsearch.version");
if (esVersionString == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("property [elasticsearch.version] is missing for plugin [" + name + "]");
}
final Version esVersion = Version.fromString(esVersionString);
```
Apart from checking esVersionString for null, we should also check for the String being empty, e.g `Strings.hasLength(esVersionString) == false`.
### Steps to Reproduce
- Take any Elasticsearch plugin from a version other than the current
- Manually edit the plugin-descriptor.properties file in the jar and set `elasticsearch.version=`
- Deploy the plugin in the latest version of Elasticsearch
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85336 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85340 | da8d8b17dd0b106060699a705f720f1e61f9b056 | 62448a0a70031cb67430b6f9871c428add6a3a28 | "2022-03-24T16:59:59Z" | java | "2022-03-28T18:27:28Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,308 | ["rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.snapshots/10_basic.yml"] | [CI] ClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=cat.snapshots/10_basic/Test cat snapshots output} failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/pwjaj4ctq7wvc/tests/:rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=cat.snapshots%2F10_basic%2FTest%20cat%20snapshots%20output%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`gradlew ':rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT" -Dtests.method="test {yaml=cat.snapshots/10_basic/Test cat snapshots output}" -Dtests.seed=E5AA625E88882A24 -Dtests.locale=da -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Ulaanbaatar -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dcat.snapshots/10_basic/Test%20cat%20snapshots%20output%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [cat.snapshots/10_basic:76]: field [$body] was expected to match the provided regex but didn't
Expected: ^ snap1\s+ test_cat_snapshots_1\s+ SUCCESS\s+ \d+\s+ \d\d\:\d\d\:\d\d\s+ \d+\s+ \d\d\:\d\d\:\d\d\s+ \S+\s+ 2\s+ 2\s+ 0\s+ 2\s*\n
snap2\s+ test_cat_snapshots_1\s+ SUCCESS\s+ \d+\s+ \d\d\:\d\d\:\d\d\s+ \d+\s+ \d\d\:\d\d\:\d\d\s+ \S+\s+ 2\s+ 2\s+ 0\s+ 2\s*\n
$
but: was "snap1 test_cat_snapshots_1 SUCCESS 1648110374 08:26:14 1648110374 08:26:14 0s 3 3 0 3\nsnap2 test_cat_snapshots_1 SUCCESS 1648110374 08:26:14 1648110374 08:26:14 0s 3 3 0 3\n"
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([E5AA625E88882A24:6DFE5D84267447DC]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:493)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: field [$body] was expected to match the provided regex but didn't
Expected: ^ snap1\s+ test_cat_snapshots_1\s+ SUCCESS\s+ \d+\s+ \d\d\:\d\d\:\d\d\s+ \d+\s+ \d\d\:\d\d\:\d\d\s+ \S+\s+ 2\s+ 2\s+ 0\s+ 2\s*\n
snap2\s+ test_cat_snapshots_1\s+ SUCCESS\s+ \d+\s+ \d\d\:\d\d\:\d\d\s+ \d+\s+ \d\d\:\d\d\:\d\d\s+ \S+\s+ 2\s+ 2\s+ 0\s+ 2\s*\n
$
but: was "snap1 test_cat_snapshots_1 SUCCESS 1648110374 08:26:14 1648110374 08:26:14 0s 3 3 0 3\nsnap2 test_cat_snapshots_1 SUCCESS 1648110374 08:26:14 1648110374 08:26:14 0s 3 3 0 3\n"
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.MatchAssertion.doAssert(MatchAssertion.java:64)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:482)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85308 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85997 | e70dc48220042b2184d4056f0dd99ea47ae3d4c7 | bf1a3a3a7088b799642ddf9f35bd745fe8cb7919 | "2022-03-24T09:35:18Z" | java | "2022-04-26T08:14:24Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,249 | ["docs/changelog/85325.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/coordination/JoinHelper.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/coordination/JoinTask.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/coordination/JoinTaskExecutor.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/coordination/JoinTaskExecutorTests.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/indices/cluster/ClusterStateChanges.java"] | Investigate possible election retry loop | I observed a 7.12 cluster that was struggling to complete an election, with at least one node holding over a million `elected-as-master` tasks in its pending task queue. I suspect there were two such nodes because they were just constantly winning elections and then failing because of the next election and so on...
It's currently unclear exactly how we got into this state, but it doesn't seem completely impossible if something else causes a bunch of spurious elections somehow while the master service was blocked. There were some faulty nodes involved for sure.
In any case I believe we can and should take steps to avoid processing stale `elected-as-master` tasks. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85249 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85325 | 3dec58dabe719e34fdf7627cea36317090156b5d | e4888dd80814a75d45c1f0dad4b1314a3419cd7c | "2022-03-22T22:14:42Z" | java | "2022-03-28T16:14:23Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,243 | ["docs/changelog/86132.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ProactiveStorageDeciderService.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ReactiveStorageDeciderService.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ShardsSize.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ReactiveReasonTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ReactiveStorageDeciderDecisionTests.java", "x-pack/plugin/autoscaling/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/autoscaling/storage/ReactiveStorageDeciderReasonWireSerializationTests.java"] | Provide more information about autoscaling policy decisions to improve debugging | In some contexts is unclear why an autoscaling policy decides to request
more resources, i.e. if there's an unassigned shard that remains unassigned
even after adding more resources. It would be help to have more information
around the decisions taken by the deciders so it is easier to understand and
track them. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85243 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86132 | f615744512b0e90dbb019670a68848e7499ff47a | 666e85be0919327cc252157e24cdb1382bc879bb | "2022-03-22T18:35:34Z" | java | "2022-06-08T06:45:36Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,222 | ["docs/changelog/88013.yaml", "docs/reference/modules/discovery/discovery-settings.asciidoc", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/coordination/Coordinator.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/settings/ClusterSettings.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/coordination/CoordinatorTests.java"] | More helpful logs if a single-node cluster has nontrivial discovery config | Users sometimes accidentally auto-bootstrap their nodes into single-node clusters and then try and join them all together later by setting `discovery.seed_hosts` or similar. Elasticsearch doesn't care if discovery points to a few extra nodes so today it reports no problems, but it's frustrating to the user that it doesn't do what they expect it to do and also doesn't indicate why.
It's almost certainly incorrect to have a nontrivial discovery config in a single-node cluster: `discovery.seed_hosts` and `discovery.seed_providers` should both be unset or empty[^1], so this is a strong indicator that the user is trying to form a multi-node cluster incorrectly. We can therefore be more helpful to these users by emitting periodic warnings in a single-node cluster with nontrivial discovery config:
> `This node is a fully-formed single-node cluster with cluster UUID [{clusterUUID}], but [{setting}] is set to [{value}] as if to discover other nodes and form a multi-node cluster. Fully-formed clusters do not attempt to discover other nodes, and nodes with different cluster UUIDs cannot belong to the same cluster. The cluster UUID persists across restarts and can only be changed by deleting the contents of the node's data path(s). Remove the discovery configuration to suppress this message.`
[^1]: it's also (kind of) acceptable if `discovery.seed_hosts` contains just the node's own publish address, or we're using just the `file` provider and `unicast_hosts.txt` contains just the node's own publish address. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85222 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/88013 | 4cdfe7e1b1afaae3646b681009f89e4b527bf191 | 50d2cf31b83505430c1d12b49a5f873082ea592a | "2022-03-22T12:38:23Z" | java | "2022-06-30T13:35:15Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,207 | ["server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/MetadataIndexStateService.java"] | MetadataIndexStateService block log messages are confusing | Tiny supportability nit: today we emit these log messages when adding a write block to an index:
```
[2022-03-22T19:43:26,897][INFO ][o.e.c.m.MetadataIndexStateService] [node_t1] adding block write to indices [[test-blocks/eLkrYpm_S3WNemfWpXrhPA]]
[2022-03-22T19:43:26,933][INFO ][o.e.c.m.MetadataIndexStateService] [node_t1] completed adding block write to indices [test-blocks]
```
This is kind of confusing, a `block write` sounds like we're writing a block of data. It's not clear that `write` is variable (we also say `block read`) or the name of a block setting. I think we should word this as `adding [index.blocks.write] block to indices` instead. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85207 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85237 | 942e5fd9fca2e49e70c2b6b3f4e21884615368c1 | 4e1a0631e860f20a116a2879a0dfe562bece9879 | "2022-03-22T09:54:14Z" | java | "2022-08-03T15:21:35Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,203 | ["docs/changelog/85656.yaml", "docs/reference/search/profile.asciidoc", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/profile/query/ProfileWeight.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/profile/query/QueryTimingType.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/search/profile/query/QueryProfilerTests.java"] | ProfileWeight should instrument `Weight#count`. | ### Description
As we are about to start leveraging `Weight#count` to compute total hit counts (https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84778) and aggregation counts (https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/81322), we should start instrumenting it so that we can get information about time spent in `Weight#count`. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85203 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85656 | bb3698cfee7c0a3e74d9bca09214df9aeb1e4a33 | 7e9ce33e8483825c56c62c4f095416c3e4a32d28 | "2022-03-22T08:33:11Z" | java | "2022-11-21T12:32:48Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,175 | ["x-pack/plugin/ilm/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ilm/PolicyStepsRegistry.java", "x-pack/plugin/ilm/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ilm/PolicyStepsRegistryTests.java"] | [CI] DataTiersMigrationsTests testUserOptsOutOfTierMigration failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/aodpvg6m2oba4/tests/:x-pack:plugin:ilm:internalClusterTest/org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.DataTiersMigrationsTests/testUserOptsOutOfTierMigration
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:ilm:internalClusterTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.DataTiersMigrationsTests.testUserOptsOutOfTierMigration" -Dtests.seed=D3FF350541188AFA -Dtests.locale=ar-IQ -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Famagusta -Druntime.java=18`
**Applicable branches:**
8.1
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.DataTiersMigrationsTests&tests.test=testUserOptsOutOfTierMigration
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError:
Expected: is "warm"
but: was "new"
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:923)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.DataTiersMigrationsTests.lambda$testUserOptsOutOfTierMigration$3(DataTiersMigrationsTests.java:192)
at org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase.assertBusy(ESTestCase.java:1070)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.DataTiersMigrationsTests.testUserOptsOutOfTierMigration(DataTiersMigrationsTests.java:187)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:577)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85175 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85346 | bd6b27c699de8ad807d862492e174f33fb3b2002 | ff517c57c4cbb4fc638e855805ff0e376c39a865 | "2022-03-21T15:54:47Z" | java | "2022-03-28T14:31:10Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,130 | ["docs/reference/tab-widgets/api-call.asciidoc", "docs/reference/tab-widgets/quick-start-cleanup.asciidoc", "docs/reference/tab-widgets/quick-start-install.asciidoc"] | [DOCS] Quick start `curl` documentation for http and not https | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.0.0
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Linux reinoso 5.8.0-59-generic #66~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 17 11:14:10 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
### Problem Description
On documentation: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/getting-started.html#send-requests-to-elasticsearch
You can see to use:
```bash
curl -X GET http://localhost:9200/
```
But if you use default self-management, you have a certificate and credentials.
### Steps to Reproduce
One time installed Elasticsearch 8.1.0 from Docker, you can't use:
```bash
$ curl -X GET http://localhost:9200/
curl: (52) Empty reply from server
```
I'm not sure the correct fix, but it works with `curl:`
```bash
curl -k -u elastic:<password> -X GET https://localhost:9200/
```
Where:
- `-k` is for ignore the credentials from Elasticsearch. I don't think that's a good option, but for now I don't know how to get Elasticsearch credentials.
- https, by default Elasticsearch works with https
- `-u` You need a credential in Elasticsearch by default now. And the default user is `elastic`.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85130 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86145 | a733f4287acd7816571cf2d8ad643d47a8d68a28 | 336965201b102019abcb5a28309e013748414d7d | "2022-03-19T19:41:54Z" | java | "2022-04-27T12:43:00Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,110 | ["docs/changelog/85118.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/AggregatorBase.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/bucket/sampler/random/RandomSamplerAggregator.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/bucket/sampler/random/RandomSamplerAggregatorTests.java"] | Skip sampling for min/max aggregation if value can be determined via point reader | ### Description
Min/Max aggregations do not require any scaling for the random_sampler results. Additionally, if the min/max an be determined via the pointReader (i.e. not by individual doc values), we should use that as it means that sampler doesn't need to supply documents to the min/max agg, potentially speeding things up significantly and improving accuracy.
related to: https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84353 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85110 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85118 | 64372da8a20fa30f83b65ae1ad1e9ab535e56d52 | 689e62877d327b43cbfa1a5232081715a07ac7cd | "2022-03-18T14:39:46Z" | java | "2022-04-28T18:40:36Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,105 | ["docs/changelog/85106.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/ql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ql/expression/predicate/operator/math/Maths.java", "x-pack/plugin/sql/qa/server/src/main/resources/math.csv-spec", "x-pack/plugin/sql/qa/server/src/main/resources/math.sql-spec", "x-pack/plugin/sql/qa/server/src/main/resources/unsigned-long.csv-spec", "x-pack/plugin/sql/qa/server/src/main/resources/unsigned-long.sql-spec", "x-pack/plugin/sql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/sql/expression/function/scalar/math/BinaryOptionalMathProcessor.java", "x-pack/plugin/sql/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/sql/expression/function/scalar/math/BinaryMathProcessorTests.java"] | SQL: ROUND() of big numbers leads to wrong results | - for Long values, the conversion from long to double can lead to loss of precision. Eg.
```
SELECT CAST(ROUND(922337203685477580) AS LONG) as a
```
returns
```
922337203685477632
```
- for floating point values, when the two numbers passed to ROUND() funciton are too big, the values are truncated to Long.MAX_VALUE and hence wrongly rounded. Eg.
```
SELECT ROUND(100000000000.0, 8) as a
```
returns
```
9.223372036854776E10
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85105 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85106 | 92c45385f128ccdd872b93122af77c3bd6847d03 | 087bd1d5fc7d5b08d141896f59bcf80ff211bd22 | "2022-03-18T14:18:52Z" | java | "2022-03-30T06:50:43Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,090 | ["x-pack/plugin/security/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/rest/action/profile/RestSearchProfilesAction.java", "x-pack/plugin/security/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/security/rest/action/profile/RestSearchProfilesActionTests.java"] | Search User Profiles needs to support "source" paremter | ### Description
In Elasticsearch, all GET requests that have a body must also support that body being passed as a URL parameter named `source`. (This is because GET requests with a body are not standardized and not all clients can support it.)
The `RestSearchProfilesAction` does not support the "source" parameter, as shown in this test failure:
```
./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:yamlRestTest' \
--tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT.test {p0=user_profile/10_basic/Test search user profile}" \
-Dtests.seed=70BB2C6E68358B31 -Dtests.locale=lv -Dtests.timezone=Europe/Skopje \
-Druntime.java=17 -Dtests.fips.enabled=true
```
You can solve this by switching `hasContent` + `contentParser` to `hasContentOrSourceParam()` + `contentOrSourceParamParser()` (for an example, see `RestQueryApiKeyAction`)
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85090 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85139 | 9ec646302dfbea6d1ffd2bdd1607799f3a599048 | 0d3295a15b7309fa3a8be2c6a362e0329b19ff23 | "2022-03-18T06:40:02Z" | java | "2022-03-21T12:29:20Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,075 | ["x-pack/plugin/ilm/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ilm/PolicyStepsRegistry.java", "x-pack/plugin/ilm/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ilm/PolicyStepsRegistryTests.java"] | [CI] ILMMultiNodeIT testShrinkOnTiers failing | Started failing in this way about 10 days ago (3-7-22). Seems to be affecting 7.17 and 8.1 branches.
**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/kg23spzlawfu6/tests/:x-pack:plugin:ilm:internalClusterTest/org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.ILMMultiNodeIT/testShrinkOnTiers
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:ilm:internalClusterTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.ILMMultiNodeIT.testShrinkOnTiers" -Dtests.seed=F8EDA3E765E3F9DC -Dtests.locale=fr-LU -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT-6 -Druntime.java=11`
**Applicable branches:**
7.17, 8.1
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.ILMMultiNodeIT&tests.test=testShrinkOnTiers
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Unable to find an ilm explain output for the shrunk index of myindex
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.ILMMultiNodeIT.lambda$testShrinkOnTiers$0(ILMMultiNodeIT.java:154)
at org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase.assertBusy(ESTestCase.java:1142)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.ilm.ILMMultiNodeIT.testShrinkOnTiers(ILMMultiNodeIT.java:137)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:-2)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1750)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:938)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:974)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:988)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:947)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:832)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:883)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:894)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85075 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85346 | bd6b27c699de8ad807d862492e174f33fb3b2002 | ff517c57c4cbb4fc638e855805ff0e376c39a865 | "2022-03-17T20:00:04Z" | java | "2022-03-28T14:31:10Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,046 | ["docs/reference/redirects.asciidoc", "x-pack/docs/en/security/configuring-stack-security.asciidoc", "x-pack/docs/en/security/images/elastic-security-overview.png", "x-pack/docs/en/security/index.asciidoc", "x-pack/docs/en/security/securing-communications/security-minimal-setup.asciidoc", "x-pack/docs/en/security/security-manual-configuration.asciidoc"] | 8.x security setup docs don't describe how to set up kibana | ### Description
As part of security on by default we removed a lot of the existing "setting up security" documentation, because it was no longer relevant.
However, that means that we have a gap in our docs for people who want to turn on security on an existing cluster.
In particular the 7.x docs have a page for [setting up passwords and configuring Kibana](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/security-minimal-setup.html#security-create-builtin-users) but there is no obvious replacement in 8.x
The docs jump straight into setting up TLS, and skip the Kibana authentication process.
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85046 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/88393 | 2605b9e1215041e1a7cc4983fbe919e94df86b12 | 1441367d0b14eb891b221f9a21846b791aa89cc7 | "2022-03-17T00:50:11Z" | java | "2022-07-19T14:01:34Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 85,043 | ["docs/changelog/85287.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/watcher/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/watcher/support/WatcherIndexTemplateRegistry.java"] | Watcher history created as index with wrong mapping instead of data stream after 8.0 upgrade | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.0.1
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Elastic Cloud
### Problem Description
After upgrading from 7.17 to 8.0.1 we noticed that some watches would not write their history.
The ES logs has many log lines similar to
`[instance-0000000115] watch history could not be written [mywatch_5a0585ef-b8b1-4526-8b24-9fb9bf58981d-2022-03-15T11:29:32.801579308Z], failure [org.elasticsearch.index.mapper.MapperParsingException: failed to parse]`
I noticed that `.watcher-history-16` has the wrong mapping as everything just has default `.text`+`.keyword`, and the index template has a lot more specific fields. But the index template applies to a data stream, but `.watcher-history-16` got created as an index, so the template didn't apply. It should have been created as a data stream after https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/64252, but somehow it didn't.
### Steps to Reproduce
(unconfirmed)
Create a 7.17 cluster with multiple nodes
Create multiple watches that fire rapidly.
Upgrade ES to 8.x
`.watcher-history-16` should be created as data stream, but got created as an index.
I tried it with a simple cluster and one watch firing every second and it upgraded to datastream, so it might be a race condition or depend on how many watches/how many nodes (we have ~80 watches/12 nodes)
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_
This looks a bit similar to https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/56732 except now that it's a data stream it won't be "fixed" by waiting until roll over. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/85043 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85287 | f484d5f22cfe354f7dd98619b621fd5159782051 | 45d3b962b7fc5656d5f13145c32427556b08c3ca | "2022-03-16T21:58:15Z" | java | "2022-03-23T20:54:25Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,975 | ["rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/indices.forcemerge/10_basic.yml"] | [CI] ClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=indices.get_alias/10_basic/Get alias with local flag} failing | Similar to #82151 - needs to be prepared to encounter system indices (ie. .tasks)
**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/uhzvmq7tvt5jw/tests/:rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=indices.get_alias%2F10_basic%2FGet%20alias%20with%20local%20flag%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT" -Dtests.method="test {yaml=indices.get_alias/10_basic/Get alias with local flag}" -Dtests.seed=ED7A1E2FB2CC2351 -Dtests.locale=ko -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT+3 -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
Didn't try
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dindices.get_alias/10_basic/Get%20alias%20with%20local%20flag%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [indices.get_alias/10_basic:302]: got unexpected warning header [
299 Elasticsearch-8.2.0-SNAPSHOT-61c3b82c2ed805ab9fa8de764a16e96b41488510 "this request accesses system indices: [.tasks], but in a future major version, direct access to system indices will be prevented by default"
]
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([ED7A1E2FB2CC2351:652E21F51C304EA9]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:493)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: got unexpected warning header [
299 Elasticsearch-8.2.0-SNAPSHOT-61c3b82c2ed805ab9fa8de764a16e96b41488510 "this request accesses system indices: [.tasks], but in a future major version, direct access to system indices will be prevented by default"
]
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.DoSection.checkWarningHeaders(DoSection.java:514)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.DoSection.execute(DoSection.java:372)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:482)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84975 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85683 | 378736ac320afe5d4d82fcfb38e196346d63ca5b | 92852f3eac3c6dfe7689c61a5a852aba1d6ecb07 | "2022-03-15T11:20:41Z" | java | "2022-04-04T21:26:52Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,972 | ["rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.allocation/10_basic.yml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.indices/10_basic.yml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.indices/20_hidden.yml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.shards/10_basic.yml"] | [CI] ClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=cat.indices/20_hidden/Test cat indices output for dot-hidden index and dot-prefixed pattern} failing | Similar to #82151
These regexes need to be prepared to see .tasks (and other system indices)
**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/amzx7q7wv6472/tests/:rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=cat.indices%2F20_hidden%2FTest%20cat%20indices%20output%20for%20dot-hidden%20index%20and%20dot-prefixed%20pattern%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT" -Dtests.method="test {yaml=cat.indices/20_hidden/Test cat indices output for dot-hidden index and dot-prefixed pattern}" -Dtests.seed=BBE00A4907456C0D -Dtests.locale=und -Dtests.timezone=America/Argentina/Ushuaia -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
Didn't try
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dcat.indices/20_hidden/Test%20cat%20indices%20output%20for%20dot-hidden%20index%20and%20dot-prefixed%20pattern%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [cat.indices/20_hidden:62]: field [$body] was expected to match the provided regex but didn't
Expected: ^(green \s+
open \s+
\.index1 \s+
([a-zA-Z0-9=/_+]|[\\\-]){22} \s+
1 \s+
0 \s+
0 \s+
0 \s+
(\d+|\d+[.]\d+)(kb|b) \s+
(\d+|\d+[.]\d+)(kb|b) \s*
)
$
but: was "green open .index1 EoB3_v1ZRna6bjWL6dEVZg 1 0 0 0 225b 225b\ngreen open .tasks bpEwrkQXQ32__CwtJPROgA 1 0 0 0 225b 225b\n"
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([BBE00A4907456C0D:33B43593A9B901F5]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:493)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: field [$body] was expected to match the provided regex but didn't
Expected: ^(green \s+
open \s+
\.index1 \s+
([a-zA-Z0-9=/_+]|[\\\-]){22} \s+
1 \s+
0 \s+
0 \s+
0 \s+
(\d+|\d+[.]\d+)(kb|b) \s+
(\d+|\d+[.]\d+)(kb|b) \s*
)
$
but: was "green open .index1 EoB3_v1ZRna6bjWL6dEVZg 1 0 0 0 225b 225b\ngreen open .tasks bpEwrkQXQ32__CwtJPROgA 1 0 0 0 225b 225b\n"
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.MatchAssertion.doAssert(MatchAssertion.java:64)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:482)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84972 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84539 | 8a1632235daa140f3904cfe46f8215537c75ded3 | c4b1f18f32aa337253664d1295bc1b59233b3d44 | "2022-03-15T11:02:23Z" | java | "2022-03-24T19:08:51Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,948 | ["server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/transport/ForkingResponseHandlerRunnable.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/transport/InboundHandler.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/transport/TransportService.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/transport/TransportServiceLifecycleTests.java", "test/framework/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/transport/AbstractSimpleTransportTestCase.java"] | LEAK resource not cleaned up RelocationIT testRelocationEstablishedPeerRecoveryRetentionLeases | ### CI Link
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/coilrchnhdicw
### Repro line
./gradlew ':server:internalClusterTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.recovery.RelocationIT.testRelocationEstablishedPeerRecoveryRetentionLeases" -Dtests.seed=48DD4597C7EC8FF7 -Dtests.locale=es-PA -Dtests.timezone=Europe/Bucharest -Druntime.java=17
### Does it reproduce?
No
### Applicable branches
master
### Failure history
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?search.relativeStartTime=P7D&search.timeZoneId=Europe/Bucharest&tests.container=org.elasticsearch.recovery.RelocationIT&tests.sortField=FAILED&tests.test=testRelocationEstablishedPeerRecoveryRetentionLeases&tests.unstableOnly=true
### Failure excerpt
1> [2022-03-14T13:43:38,122][INFO ][o.e.r.RelocationIT ] [testRelocationEstablishedPeerRecoveryRetentionLeases] [RelocationIT#testRelocationEstablishedPeerRecoveryRetentionLeases]: cleaned up after test
2> REPRODUCE WITH: ./gradlew ':server:internalClusterTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.recovery.RelocationIT.testRelocationEstablishedPeerRecoveryRetentionLeases" -Dtests.seed=48DD4597C7EC8FF7 -Dtests.locale=es-PA -Dtests.timezone=Europe/Bucharest -Druntime.java=17
2> java.lang.AssertionError:
Expected: an empty collection
but: <[LEAK: resource was not cleaned up before it was garbage-collected.
Recent access records:
Created at:
org.elasticsearch.common.util.MockPageCacheRecycler.wrap(MockPageCacheRecycler.java:32)
org.elasticsearch.common.util.MockPageCacheRecycler.bytePage(MockPageCacheRecycler.java:72)
org.elasticsearch.transport.BytesRefRecycler.obtain(BytesRefRecycler.java:27)
org.elasticsearch.common.io.stream.RecyclerBytesStreamOutput.ensureCapacityFromPosition(RecyclerBytesStreamOutput.java:211)
org.elasticsearch.common.io.stream.RecyclerBytesStreamOutput.ensureCapacity(RecyclerBytesStreamOutput.java:202)
org.elasticsearch.common.io.stream.RecyclerBytesStreamOutput.writeBytes(RecyclerBytesStreamOutput.java:77)
org.elasticsearch.common.io.Streams$FlushOnCloseOutputStream.writeBytes(Streams.java:274)
org.elasticsearch.common.io.stream.StreamOutput.write(StreamOutput.java:482)
java.base/java.io.OutputStream.write(OutputStream.java:127)
org.elasticsearch.common.compress.DeflateCompressor.threadLocalOutputStream(DeflateCompressor.java:179)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.coordination.PublicationTransportHandler.serializeDiffClusterState(PublicationTransportHandler.java:266)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.coordination.PublicationTransportHandler$PublicationContext.lambda$buildDiffAndSerializeStates$2(PublicationTransportHandler.java:329)
java.base/java.util.HashMap.computeIfAbsent(HashMap.java:1220)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.coordination.PublicationTransportHandler$PublicationContext.buildDiffAndSerializeStates(PublicationTransportHandler.java:327)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.coordination.PublicationTransportHandler.newPublicationContext(PublicationTransportHandler.java:213)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.coordination.Coordinator.publish(Coordinator.java:1368)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.MasterService.publish(MasterService.java:416)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.MasterService.runTasks(MasterService.java:309)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.MasterService$Batcher.run(MasterService.java:153)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.TaskBatcher.runIfNotProcessed(TaskBatcher.java:114)
org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.TaskBatcher$BatchedTask.run(TaskBatcher.java:170)
org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.ThreadContext$ContextPreservingRunnable.run(ThreadContext.java:717)
org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor$TieBreakingPrioritizedRunnable.runAndClean(PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor.java:260)
org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor$TieBreakingPrioritizedRunnable.run(PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor.java:223)
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)]>
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([48DD4597C7EC8FF7:886D486B4E0323C8]:0)
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:923)
at org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase.checkStaticState(ESTestCase.java:639)
at org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase.after(ESTestCase.java:427)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor22.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:1004)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
1> [2022-03-14T13:43:38,149][INFO ][o.e.r.RelocationIT ] [testIndexSearchAndRelocateConcurrently] before test
1> [2022-03-14T13:43:38,149][INFO ][o.e.r.RelocationIT ] [testIndexSearchAndRelocateConcurrently] [RelocationIT#testIndexSearchAndRelocateConcurrently]: setting up test
1> [2022-03-14T13:43:38,150][INFO ][o.e.t.InternalTestCluster] [testIndexSearchAndRelocateConcurrently] Setup InternalTestCluster [TEST-TEST_WORKER_VM=[471]-CLUSTER_SEED=[-2805428162336455921]-HASH=[1322FA3E367]-cluster] with seed [D9111DF33D0F030F] using [0] dedicated masters, [0] (data) nodes and [0] coord only nodes (master nodes are [auto-managed]) | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84948 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85131 | fd76f9c5d12b50eab2dd3f3c64353661d37fb071 | 8f9d2fa924bb50a0eb604c599da41ed5810d0bfa | "2022-03-14T13:10:49Z" | java | "2022-03-22T17:25:10Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,943 | ["docs/changelog/87082.yaml", "docs/reference/modules/threadpool.asciidoc", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/threadpool/ThreadPool.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/threadpool/ThreadPoolTests.java"] | Increase force_merge thread_pool based on allocated processors | ### Description
Today, [force merge is assigned one thread](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/modules-threadpool.html) only.
> For [force merge](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/indices-forcemerge.html) operations. Thread pool type is fixed with a size of 1 and an unbounded queue size.
In a large cluster where there are many processors available, there could be a backlog of force merge queued up. Perhaps we should look into changing the default of force merge thread_pool to a max of `min(1, (# of allocated processors) / 8)` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84943 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87082 | fbf335dcf147ccc65843cc83e9ca96804269a4ca | beadcaf631c5541e16b1c81e137aa7c030327059 | "2022-03-14T10:37:24Z" | java | "2022-05-25T13:45:28Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,927 | ["rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/search.aggregation/470_significant_texts.yml"] | [CI] SmokeTestMultiNodeClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=search.aggregation/470_significant_texts/*} failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/wshfsmsab4tk4/tests/:qa:smoke-test-multinode:integTest/org.elasticsearch.smoketest.SmokeTestMultiNodeClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=search.aggregation%2F470_significant_texts%2Fsignificant_texts%20with%20min_doc_count%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':qa:smoke-test-multinode:integTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.smoketest.SmokeTestMultiNodeClientYamlTestSuiteIT" -Dtests.method="test {yaml=search.aggregation/470_significant_texts/significant_texts with min_doc_count}" -Dtests.seed=A31EEA51FD9A97F7 -Dtests.locale=zh-CN -Dtests.timezone=America/Lima -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
Didn't try
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.smoketest.SmokeTestMultiNodeClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dsearch.aggregation/470_significant_texts/significant_texts%20with%20min_doc_count%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [search.aggregation/470_significant_texts:136]: field [aggregations.significant_texts.keywords.buckets] doesn't have length [1]
Expected: <1>
but: was <0>
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A31EEA51FD9A97F7:2B4AD58B5366FA0F]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:493)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: field [aggregations.significant_texts.keywords.buckets] doesn't have length [1]
Expected: <1>
but: was <0>
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.LengthAssertion.doAssert(LengthAssertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:482)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84927 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84998 | 61cd70be16e8f156173fa98c9e004cba16c835af | b0de0683f632b4ffc9bcf76cf902902cdc653cb2 | "2022-03-14T00:02:01Z" | java | "2022-03-17T10:25:05Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,869 | ["server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/SystemIndexMetadataUpgradeService.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/IndexService.java"] | [CI] ':x-pack:qa:full-cluster-restart:v7.5.0#upgradedClusterTest' | ### CI Link
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/j4ilhrcoxxn64
### Repro line
./gradlew ':x-pack:qa:full-cluster-restart:v7.5.0#upgradedClusterTest'
### Does it reproduce?
Yes
### Applicable branches
master
### Failure history
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/failures?failures.failureClassification=all_failures&failures.failureMessage=Execution%20failed%20for%20task%20*%0A%3E%20process%20was%20found%20dead%20while%20waiting%20for%20cluster%20health%20yellow%2C%20*&search.relativeStartTime=P7D&search.timeZoneId=America/Chicago
### Failure excerpt
```
» [2022-03-10T15:01:58,728][WARN ][o.e.t.RemoteClusterConnection] [v7.5.0-0] fetching nodes from external cluster [foo] failed
» org.elasticsearch.transport.ConnectTransportException: [][127.0.0.1:9200] connect_exception
» at org.elasticsearch.transport.TcpTransport$ChannelsConnectedListener.onFailure(TcpTransport.java:989) ~[elasticsearch-7.5.0.jar:7.5.0]
» at org.elasticsearch.action.ActionListener.lambda$toBiConsumer$3(ActionListener.java:162) ~[elasticsearch-7.5.0.jar:7.5.0]
...
org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor$TieBreakingPrioritizedRunnable.run(PrioritizedEsThreadPoolExecutor.java:223) ~[elasticsearch-8.1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.1.1-SNAPSHOT]
» at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136) [?:?]
» at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) [?:?]
» at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833) [?:?]
» Caused by: io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AnnotatedConnectException: Connection refused: 127.0.0.1/127.0.0.1:45187
» Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
» at sun.nio.ch.Net.pollConnect(Native Method) ~[?:?]
» at sun.nio.ch.Net.pollConnectNow(Net.java:672) ~[?:?]
» at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:946) ~[?:?]
» at io.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioSocketChannel.doFinishConnect(NioSocketChannel.java:330) ~[?:?]
» at io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioChannel$AbstractNioUnsafe.finishConnect(AbstractNioChannel.java:334) ~[?:?]
» at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:710) ~[?:?]
» at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysPlain(NioEventLoop.java:623) ~[?:?]
» at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:586) ~[?:?]
» at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:496) ~[?:?]
» at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:986) ~[?:?]
» at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74) ~[?:?]
» ... 1 more
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84869 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84994 | 91379ea21e7d987272ba49e385e74ec55a904d84 | 351a410ebfdbaf97d15971ad0a438f17d1126573 | "2022-03-10T15:19:33Z" | java | "2022-03-16T07:34:09Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,820 | ["docs/changelog/84988.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/inference/nlp/ZeroShotClassificationProcessor.java", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/inference/nlp/tokenizers/BertTokenizer.java", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/inference/nlp/tokenizers/NlpTokenizer.java", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/inference/nlp/tokenizers/RobertaTokenizer.java"] | [ML] improve zero_shot_classification speed by caching sequence tokenizations | ### Description
When completing a zero_shot classification task, there is the input sequence (provided by the user), and labels (also provided by the user).
Tokenization as it is done now tokenizes the input sequence len(labels) times. We should really only do it once and pass those tokenized values to request builder.
Some of the changes introduce here: https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84777 should make implementing this simpler (as there will be a unified temporary tokenization result object). | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84820 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84988 | 273eeddc14601988ad0a70f0b199d163c6e09f1d | 31ccf3ac09e955c446a61a7bd4a10c3b00dbcabc | "2022-03-09T15:46:59Z" | java | "2022-03-15T16:05:46Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,801 | ["docs/changelog/88785.yaml", "docs/reference/indices/diskusage.asciidoc", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/indices.stats/50_disk_usage.yml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/action/admin/indices/diskusage/IndexDiskUsageAnalyzer.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/action/admin/indices/diskusage/IndexDiskUsageStats.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/action/admin/indices/diskusage/IndexDiskUsageAnalyzerTests.java"] | Add support for vectors to the disk usage API | ### Description
We now support storing KNN vectors as part of our indexed data. These vectors should be included in the disk usage API. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84801 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/88785 | 9b5cd671ec9137466677269f28f599f11a59621a | abd561a277c4a232170485d1a4b66474aaeb5a00 | "2022-03-09T12:31:16Z" | java | "2022-07-26T14:57:47Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,788 | ["docs/changelog/87505.yaml", "server/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/AutoExpandReplicasIT.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/AutoExpandReplicas.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/AutoExpandReplicasTests.java"] | Auto-expand replicas should clamp to closest value | ### Elasticsearch Version
All
### Installed Plugins
N/A
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
N/A
### Problem Description
Today if an index has an `index.auto_expand_replicas` setting which cannot be realised in the cluster then the number of replicas is left unchanged by `AllocationService#adaptAutoExpandReplicas()`. Instead, I think we should change the number of replicas to the closest value within the permitted range.
For instance: if a cluster has a single data node which is marked as shutting down for restart then auto-expand replicas considers this cluster to have zero data nodes, and hence requires -1 replicas. If an index is created with `index.auto_expand_replicas: "0-1"` then it will not be adjusted to have zero replicas, even though this would be better than leaving it at the default value of 1 replica, and will ultimately be the correct setting.
### Steps to Reproduce
1. Create a cluster with one data node.
2. Put a `RESTART` shutdown marker on the data node.
3. Create an index with `index.auto_expand_replicas: "0-1"`
4. Observe that this results in an unassigned replica.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84788 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/87505 | 10200b40b7520f7cbf1f7651c0f15214b0c95deb | 60efb9d0e7dc1bf8ce0db5e7f220b9dee00297c8 | "2022-03-09T08:17:13Z" | java | "2022-06-13T15:23:53Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,772 | ["x-pack/plugin/logstash/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/logstash/action/TransportGetPipelineAction.java", "x-pack/plugin/logstash/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/logstash/action/TransportGetPipelineActionTests.java"] | Logstash central management API cluster side wildcard matching | ### Description
Logstash uses the endpoint `_logstash/pipeline` to retrieve the pipelines configuration from Central Management.
Logstash permit to use the `*` wildcard operator to specify the pipeline names, so a user is not required to list all the pipelines, but just capture the common not changing part of the name.
Suppose the user has a pipelines with common prefix (for example `pipeline_proxy_1`..`pipeline_proxy_10`), he could also add `pipeline_11` without restarting Logstash and changing the option `xpack.management.pipeline.id`.
Actually the feature is implemented on Logstash side, retrieving all the pipelines and then filtering out the ones that doesn't match; this is a waste.
This feature request asks to implement the wildcard operator selector on Elasticsearch side.
The rules for wildcard in pipeline names are:
must begin with a letter or underscore and contain only letters, underscores, dashes, and numbers wildcard character `*` is also acceptable and follows globbing rules.
The regexp is defined [here](https://github.com/elastic/logstash/blob/0887d7609df9ba72a5d0cd003c639b16da198622/x-pack/lib/config_management/bootstrap_check.rb#L17-L19).
We could imagine to use the `_logstash/pipeline/<pipeline_id>` where the pipeline_id is a list of comma-separated id (like it's today) but permitting the pipeline_id to use the wildcard operator.
Related:
- Logstash ER https://github.com/elastic/logstash/issues/13868
| https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84772 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85847 | 54efc59effdef98dd2ca7c87404c38c3844d65b2 | b48c92013d6968f104855da2646d314298815de0 | "2022-03-08T17:01:30Z" | java | "2022-05-16T16:09:40Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,765 | ["rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.allocation/10_basic.yml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.indices/10_basic.yml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.indices/20_hidden.yml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.shards/10_basic.yml"] | [CI] ClientYamlTestSuiteIT test {yaml=cat.indices/20_hidden/Test cat indices output with a hidden index, dot-hidden alias and dot pattern} failing | **Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/u542s62n2rpu6/tests/:rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT/test%20%7Byaml=cat.indices%2F20_hidden%2FTest%20cat%20indices%20output%20with%20a%20hidden%20index,%20dot-hidden%20alias%20and%20dot%20pattern%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':rest-api-spec:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT" -Dtests.method="test {yaml=cat.indices/20_hidden/Test cat indices output with a hidden index, dot-hidden alias and dot pattern}" -Dtests.seed=8BC046FB4B140AC -Dtests.locale=da-DK -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Tomsk -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
master
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ClientYamlTestSuiteIT&tests.test=test%20%7Byaml%3Dcat.indices/20_hidden/Test%20cat%20indices%20output%20with%20a%20hidden%20index,%20dot-hidden%20alias%20and%20dot%20pattern%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [cat.indices/20_hidden:225]: field [$body] was expected to match the provided regex but didn't
Expected: ^(green \s+
open \s+
index1 \s+
([a-zA-Z0-9=/_+]|[\\\-]){22} \s+
1 \s+
0 \s+
0 \s+
0 \s+
(\d+|\d+[.]\d+)(kb|b) \s+
(\d+|\d+[.]\d+)(kb|b) \s*
)
$
but: was "green open index1 qZ_OW205TNOPCu8s1CSMQw 1 0 0 0 225b 225b\ngreen open .tasks M5_QYgQhQxygThYUVqMM8w 1 0 0 0 225b 225b\n"
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BC046FB4B140AC:80E83BB51A4D2D54]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:493)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: field [$body] was expected to match the provided regex but didn't
Expected: ^(green \s+
open \s+
index1 \s+
([a-zA-Z0-9=/_+]|[\\\-]){22} \s+
1 \s+
0 \s+
0 \s+
0 \s+
(\d+|\d+[.]\d+)(kb|b) \s+
(\d+|\d+[.]\d+)(kb|b) \s*
)
$
but: was "green open index1 qZ_OW205TNOPCu8s1CSMQw 1 0 0 0 225b 225b\ngreen open .tasks M5_QYgQhQxygThYUVqMM8w 1 0 0 0 225b 225b\n"
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:18)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:956)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.MatchAssertion.doAssert(MatchAssertion.java:64)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.Assertion.execute(Assertion.java:65)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:482)
at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:462)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(null:-1)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84765 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84539 | 8a1632235daa140f3904cfe46f8215537c75ded3 | c4b1f18f32aa337253664d1295bc1b59233b3d44 | "2022-03-08T14:56:26Z" | java | "2022-03-24T19:08:51Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,739 | ["docs/changelog/84894.yaml", "docs/reference/settings/notification-settings.asciidoc", "x-pack/plugin/watcher/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/watcher/notification/email/EmailService.java", "x-pack/plugin/watcher/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/watcher/notification/email/EmailServiceTests.java"] | Add configurable list of allowed domains for Watcher email action | ### Description
When using the Watcher email action, it would be beneficial to be able to specify a list of allowed domains to which emails are allowed to be sent. This would probably be a non-dynamic setting, and allow specifying multiple domains. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84739 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84894 | 6a960ac1e677e1d1103b0d35eabcdb582207723b | ef01949562b80dcb5f6bf53d251a46d6caa3e478 | "2022-03-07T22:40:49Z" | java | "2022-03-16T14:03:58Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,709 | ["x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/job/process/autodetect/AutodetectProcessManager.java", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/job/process/autodetect/JobModelSnapshotUpgrader.java", "x-pack/plugin/ml/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ml/job/snapshot/upgrader/SnapshotUpgradeTask.java"] | [CI] XPackRestIT test {p0=ml/upgrade_job_snapshot/Test existing but corrupt snapshot} failing | It's timing out in feature reset. This implies we should be more brutal about killing in-progress model snapshot upgrades in feature reset. There's no point waiting for them to complete gracefully when we're resetting ML to empty.
**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/eagejrwl4tbqg/tests/:x-pack:plugin:yamlRestTest/org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT/test%20%7Bp0=ml%2Fupgrade_job_snapshot%2FTest%20existing%20but%20corrupt%20snapshot%7D
**Reproduction line:**
`./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:yamlRestTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT.test {p0=ml/upgrade_job_snapshot/Test existing but corrupt snapshot}" -Dtests.seed=E303315D855D1857 -Dtests.locale=es-EC -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Urumqi -Druntime.java=17`
**Applicable branches:**
8.1
**Reproduces locally?:**
No
**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.XPackRestIT&tests.test=test%20%7Bp0%3Dml/upgrade_job_snapshot/Test%20existing%20but%20corrupt%20snapshot%7D
**Failure excerpt:**
```
org.elasticsearch.client.ResponseException: method [POST], host [http://[::1]:41815], URI [/_features/_reset], status line [HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error]
{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"timeout_exception","reason":"Timed out waiting for completion of [org.elasticsearch.xpack.ml.job.snapshot.upgrader.SnapshotUpgradeTask@7e68ad0d]"}],"type":"failed_node_exception","reason":"Failed node [6kCknKSqQE-fAlVRXhtMVQ]","node_id":"6kCknKSqQE-fAlVRXhtMVQ","caused_by":{"type":"timeout_exception","reason":"Timed out waiting for completion of [org.elasticsearch.xpack.ml.job.snapshot.upgrader.SnapshotUpgradeTask@7e68ad0d]"}},"status":500}
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([E303315D855D1857:6B570E872BA175AF]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient.convertResponse(RestClient.java:346)
at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient.performRequest(RestClient.java:312)
at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient.performRequest(RestClient.java:287)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ml.integration.MlRestTestStateCleaner.resetFeatures(MlRestTestStateCleaner.java:36)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.AbstractXPackRestTest.clearMlState(AbstractXPackRestTest.java:131)
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.AbstractXPackRestTest.cleanup(AbstractXPackRestTest.java:115)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:-2)
at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:1004)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
``` | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84709 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85121 | 53108045c4395fe7af19ac86831613c8ec0c1a2e | bd6b27c699de8ad807d862492e174f33fb3b2002 | "2022-03-07T15:28:56Z" | java | "2022-03-28T14:20:30Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,690 | ["docs/changelog/85815.yaml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/fetch/subphase/highlight/FastVectorHighlighter.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/fetch/subphase/highlight/SourceScoreOrderFragmentsBuilder.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/fetch/subphase/highlight/SourceSimpleFragmentsBuilder.java", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/lookup/SourceLookup.java", "server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/search/fetch/subphase/highlight/FastVectorHighlighterTests.java", "test/framework/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/fetch/HighlighterTestCase.java"] | Possible problem with Fast Vector Highlighter + Multi-Fields between 7.10.2 and 7.16.3 | ### Elasticsearch Version
7.16.3
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
Linux (Mint 20), W10
### Problem Description
The same mappings and query DSL dict which work fine to produce multi-word, multi-colour highlighting in v 7.10.2 don't seem to work with v 7.16.3: on both Linux and W10 I have had to revert to 7.10.2. I'd love it if an expert could check on what's going on: maybe there has been a substantive documented change between the two ES versions.
I had a look at the latest version (8.0) for this [here](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/highlighting.html), but nothing jumped out at me. However, in the section on fvh and multi-fields I noticed that nothing was said about using `pre-tags` and `post-tags`. The point about my example is that different terms are highlighted with different colours (in fact backgrounds).
I have [posted this](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/multi-field-mapping-search-highlighting-difference-between-7-10-2-and-7-16-3/298739) in the ES forum. No replies after a few days, hence my opening of an issue here.
### Steps to Reproduce
Given this mapping:
```
mappings = \
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"esdoc_text": {
"type": "text",
"term_vector": "with_positions_offsets",
"fields": {
"stemmed": {
"type": "text",
"analyzer": "english",
"term_vector": "with_positions_offsets",
}
}
}
}
}
}
```
and this query DSL dict:
```
data = \
{
'query': {
'simple_query_string': {
'query': self.search_string,
'fields': [
self.text_field
]
}
},
'highlight': {
'fields': {
self.text_field: {
'type': 'fvh',
'pre_tags': [
'<span style="background-color: yellow">',
'<span style="background-color: skyblue">',
'<span style="background-color: lightgreen">',
'<span style="background-color: plum">',
'<span style="background-color: lightcoral">',
'<span style="background-color: silver">',
],
'post_tags': [
'</span>', '</span>', '</span>',
'</span>', '</span>', '</span>',
]
}
},
'number_of_fragments': 0
}
}
```
... I get beautiful highlighted results using 7.10.2. But using 7.16.3, the hits are returned, but there is no "highlight" key at all in the returned response.json().
NB in the above, clearly and as one might surmise from the mapping, `self.text_field` is set to either "esdoc_text" (for standard analyser results) or "esdoc_text.stemmed" (for english stemmer analyser results).
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84690 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/85815 | cce3d924754a06634a8e353fa227be3af2eeca62 | a69cdd0ff3c23df49b19c35b258b99fc18794476 | "2022-03-06T14:05:50Z" | java | "2022-04-12T14:19:36Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,656 | ["docs/changelog/86601.yaml", "rest-api-spec/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/cat.shards/10_basic.yml", "server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/rest/action/cat/RestShardsAction.java"] | GET _cat/shards returns partial data for hidden indices | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.0.0 (still true in `master` tho)
### Installed Plugins
N/A
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
N/A
### Problem Description
`GET _cat/shards` reports a line for every shard in the cluster, but any lines for shards that belong to hidden indices are mostly blank. The reason is that this API performs two transport actions. The first action retrieves the cluster state from the master, and the result determines the list of indices to show but does not use `IndicesOptions` to filter any of them out. The second action retrieves stats from each shard, and this action accepts an `IndicesOptions` to control which ones are shown. No `IndicesOptions` is given, however, so it follows the default behaviour which skips hidden indices.
### Steps to Reproduce
1. Start a cluster
2. Use some features that create hidden indices
3. Execute `GET _cat/shards` and notice that some data is missing.
### Logs (if relevant)
<details>
<summary>Expand for output</summary>
```
GET /_cat/shards?h=*&v
# 200 OK
# index shard prirep state docs store ip id node sync_id unassigned.reason unassigned.at unassigned.for unassigned.details recoverysource.type completion.size fielddata.memory_size fielddata.evictions query_cache.memory_size query_cache.evictions flush.total flush.total_time get.current get.time get.total get.exists_time get.exists_total get.missing_time get.missing_total indexing.delete_current indexing.delete_time indexing.delete_total indexing.index_current indexing.index_time indexing.index_total indexing.index_failed merges.current merges.current_docs merges.current_size merges.total merges.total_docs merges.total_size merges.total_time refresh.total refresh.time refresh.external_total refresh.external_time refresh.listeners search.fetch_current search.fetch_time search.fetch_total search.open_contexts search.query_current search.query_time search.query_total search.scroll_current search.scroll_time search.scroll_total segments.count segments.memory segments.index_writer_memory segments.version_map_memory segments.fixed_bitset_memory seq_no.max seq_no.local_checkpoint seq_no.global_checkpoint warmer.current warmer.total warmer.total_time path.data path.state bulk.total_operations bulk.total_time bulk.total_size_in_bytes bulk.avg_time bulk.avg_size_in_bytes
# .ds-.logs-deprecation.elasticsearch-default-2022.02.27-000006 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .ds-.logs-deprecation.elasticsearch-default-2022.02.27-000006 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .security-7 0 p STARTED 117 322kb 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000 0b 0b 0 0b 0 2 16ms 0 0s 5 0s 0 0s 5 0 3ms 2 0 118ms 115 0 0 0 0b 13 1232 3.3mb 849ms 126 1.8s 121 2s 0 0 26.8s 601846 0 0 45.7s 601846 0 1.5m 140176 9 0b 0b 0b 0b 702 702 702 0 120 4ms /app/data /app/data 117 125ms 634926 1ms 8656
# .security-7 0 r STARTED 117 322kb 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004 0b 0b 0 0b 0 2 19ms 0 0s 4 0s 0 0s 4 0 3ms 2 0 136ms 115 0 0 0 0b 13 1232 3.3mb 662ms 123 1.5s 121 1.6s 0 0 9.7s 303496 0 0 26.2s 303496 0 1.3m 40954 9 0b 0b 0b 0b 702 702 702 0 120 7ms /app/data /app/data 117 142ms 634926 1ms 8655
# .monitoring-kibana-7-2022.03.02 0 p STARTED 17280 9.4mb 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000 0b 288b 0 376b 0 1 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 9.1s 17280 0 0 0 0b 634 2527360 1.3gb 33.7s 6363 48s 6311 53s 0 0 1s 13973 0 0 2.3m 39262 0 0s 0 2 0b 0b 0b 0b 17279 17279 17279 0 6310 217ms /app/data /app/data 8640 9.4s 15964133 1ms 1850
# .monitoring-kibana-7-2022.03.02 0 r STARTED 17280 9.5mb 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004 0b 432b 0 0b 0 2 22ms 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 10s 17278 0 0 0 0b 629 2506122 1.2gb 32.3s 6238 46.8s 6235 51.8s 0 0 920ms 11947 0 0 2m 36617 0 0s 0 7 0b 0b 0b 0b 17279 17279 17279 0 6234 197ms /app/data /app/data 8639 10.2s 15962280 1ms 1850
# .kibana_7.17.0_001 0 p STARTED 366 10.6mb 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000 0b 0b 0 0b 0 1 0s 0 7ms 32 7ms 27 0s 5 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 6 0s 2 1ms 0 0 44ms 35 0 0 20ms 49 0 0s 0 9 0b 0b 0b 472b 407 407 407 0 1 1ms /app/data /app/data 0 0s 0 0s 0
# .kibana_7.17.0_001 0 r STARTED 366 10.6mb 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004 0b 0b 0 0b 0 1 0s 0 6ms 17 6ms 16 0s 1 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 3 0s 2 5ms 0 0 1ms 22 0 0 13ms 28 0 0s 0 9 0b 0b 0b 472b 407 407 407 0 1 5ms /app/data /app/data 0 0s 0 0s 0
# .ds-.slm-history-5-2022.01.16-000013 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .ds-.slm-history-5-2022.01.16-000013 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .metrics-endpoint.metadata_united_default 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .metrics-endpoint.metadata_united_default 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .monitoring-alerts-7 0 p STARTED 25 78.6kb 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000 0b 0b 0 0b 0 5 110ms 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 12ms 9 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 33 92ms 20 95ms 0 0 10.7s 273647 0 0 52.3s 273647 0 0s 0 9 0b 0b 0b 0b 80337 80337 80337 0 19 0s /app/data /app/data 9 13ms 4918 0s 330
# .monitoring-alerts-7 0 r STARTED 25 87.5kb 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004 0b 0b 0 0b 0 5 122ms 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 11ms 9 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 22 105ms 16 106ms 0 0 11.9s 264643 0 0 49.5s 264643 0 0s 0 9 0b 0b 0b 0b 80337 80337 80337 0 15 0s /app/data /app/data 9 12ms 4918 0s 330
# .kibana_5 0 p STARTED 336 10.5mb 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000 0b 0b 0 0b 0 1 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 6 0s 2 1ms 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 8 0b 0b 0b 424b 2590 2590 2590 0 1 1ms /app/data /app/data 0 0s 0 0s 0
# .kibana_5 0 r STARTED 336 10.5mb 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004 0b 0b 0 0b 0 1 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 3 0s 2 2ms 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 8 0b 0b 0b 424b 2590 2590 2590 0 1 2ms /app/data /app/data 0 0s 0 0s 0
# .ds-.slm-history-5-2021.12.17-000011 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .ds-.slm-history-5-2021.12.17-000011 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .ds-.logs-deprecation.elasticsearch-default-2022.02.13-000005 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .ds-.logs-deprecation.elasticsearch-default-2022.02.13-000005 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .kibana-event-log-7.14.0-000008 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .kibana-event-log-7.14.0-000008 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .kibana_3 0 r STARTED 109 10.5mb 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000 0b 0b 0 0b 0 1 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 3 0s 2 1ms 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 8 0b 0b 0b 392b 360 360 360 0 1 1ms /app/data /app/data 0 0s 0 0s 0
# .kibana_3 0 p STARTED 109 10.5mb 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004 0b 0b 0 0b 0 1 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 6 0s 2 3ms 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 8 0b 0b 0b 392b 360 360 360 0 1 3ms /app/data /app/data 0 0s 0 0s 0
# ilm-history-3-000005 0 p STARTED 0 208b 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000 0b 0b 0 0b 0 1 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 7 0s 2 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0b 0b 0b 0b -1 -1 -1 0 1 0s /app/data /app/data 0 0s 0 0s 0
# ilm-history-3-000005 0 r STARTED 0 208b 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004 0b 0b 0 0b 0 1 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 3 0s 2 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 0b 0b 0b 0b -1 -1 -1 0 1 0s /app/data /app/data 0 0s 0 0s 0
# .ds-ilm-history-5-2021.12.17-000011 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .ds-ilm-history-5-2021.12.17-000011 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .kibana-event-log-7.16.2-000001 0 r STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .kibana-event-log-7.16.2-000001 0 p STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .ds-.slm-history-5-2021.11.17-000010 0 r STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .ds-.slm-history-5-2021.11.17-000010 0 p STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .fleet-policies-7 0 p STARTED 4 25.5kb 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000 0b 0b 0 0b 0 2 12ms 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 3ms 3 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 11 39ms 6 40ms 0 0 0s 1 0 0 1ms 2 0 0s 0 4 0b 0b 0b 0b 3 3 3 0 5 0s /app/data /app/data 3 4ms 10404 0s 1014
# .fleet-policies-7 0 r STARTED 4 25.5kb 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004 0b 0b 0 0b 0 2 12ms 0 0s 0 0s 0 0s 0 0 0s 0 0 3ms 3 0 0 0 0b 0 0 0b 0s 8 26ms 6 26ms 0 0 0s 1 0 0 2ms 2 0 0s 0 4 0b 0b 0b 0b 3 3 3 0 5 0s /app/data /app/data 3 3ms 10404 0s 1014
# .ds-.watcher-history-16-2022.03.01-000011 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# .ds-.watcher-history-16-2022.03.01-000011 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# ilm-history-2-000018 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
# ilm-history-2-000018 0 r STARTED 172.27.47.21 bfcMDTiDRkietFb9v_di7w instance-0000000004
# .kibana-event-log-7.9.1-000018 0 p STARTED 172.27.127.208 FIWiKrPpSx2Ik6IO-mMaWA instance-0000000000
...
```
</details> | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84656 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/86601 | 8e08c75aa6268615121de201eba8dff21161399c | 326bb25c08ca25bdc016083d1ced5ece406241b3 | "2022-03-04T12:18:56Z" | java | "2022-05-11T06:50:12Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,644 | ["docs/reference/setup/install/deb.asciidoc"] | [DOCS] Use of apt-key is deprecated. Install instructions should be updated | From `apt-key(8)`:
```
Use of apt-key is deprecated, except for the use of apt-key del in maintainer
scripts to remove existing keys from the main keyring. If such usage of apt-key
is desired the additional installation of the GNU Privacy Guard suite (packaged
in gnupg) is required.
apt-key(8) will last be available in Debian 11 and Ubuntu 22.04.
```
The installation instructions for Debian should be updated accordingly. | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84644 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84645 | 6f7c1582881367aa7905e57663a1b172a4ff40da | 26307bbef3df4853554224cf7f7d619c908dafc5 | "2022-03-03T22:25:47Z" | java | "2022-03-07T17:24:50Z" |
closed | elastic/elasticsearch | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch | 84,627 | ["docs/changelog/84632.yaml", "x-pack/plugin/sql/qa/server/src/main/resources/math.sql-spec", "x-pack/plugin/sql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/sql/expression/function/scalar/math/MathProcessor.java", "x-pack/plugin/sql/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/sql/expression/function/scalar/math/MathFunctionProcessorTests.java"] | SQL: `RANDOM(null)` is not always `null` | ### Elasticsearch Version
8.1.0-SNAPSHOT (but also affects 7.x releases)
### Installed Plugins
_No response_
### Java Version
_bundled_
### OS Version
OSX
### Problem Description
While the docs state that `RANDOM(null) = null` that's not always the case.
### Steps to Reproduce
```
GET _sql?format=txt
{
"query": """
SELECT random(n), n FROM longs
"""
}
```
yields
```
random(n) | n
------------------+---------------
0.7308781907032909|1
0.7311469360199058|2
0.3860252809814635|null
```
Expected would be `null` for the last row.
### Logs (if relevant)
_No response_ | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/84627 | https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/84632 | dfe20f3db71cff445281a8935212a3c2d314a223 | ccea769364a0fc72d31e9d6856a25bd0d3e1523a | "2022-03-03T15:09:56Z" | java | "2022-03-14T16:55:49Z" |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.