Datasets:

---

Rexhaif

/

wmt23-pairs-sft

like 0

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: アイコス利用者であれば経験があるかたもいる思いますが。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIf you are an ICOS user, I think there are some who have experience.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nI think there are some who have experience if you are an Icos user.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Needs improvement\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nニーズ改善\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n改良が必要\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: That's still no reason to give him another venue, but the harm is being exaggerated.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし,被害を誇大化している\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n尚无理由给他另一个场地，但其危害被夸大了。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: チャットGPTってコンピュータ音痴の私では出来ませんか？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nCan't I do chat GPT because I'm computer tone deaf?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nCan't chat GPT be computer soundless me?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I'm now on book # 31 and it's only May.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n今,私は31号の本にいますが まだ5月です\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n现在我已经在读第31本书，而现在才五月。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So if you are purchasing this ring with the intent to wear it only occasionally, I say go for it!!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nですから、たまにしか着用しないつもりでこのリングを購入しているのであれば、ぜひ購入してください。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nだから、たまにしか着けないという意図でこのリングを購入するのであれば、私はそれのために行くと言います!!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Very much worth having a go at.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nで行く価値が非常にあります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n非常值得一试。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ドミニカのルイス・ロドリゲス投手、背番号は156番だそうです(^^)\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAnd I'm going to tell you about Luis Rodriguez, the Dominican pitcher, who we know has the number 156 on his back.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nDominican pitcher Luis Rodriguez, the number is 156 (^^)\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: We are very heavy handed and tend to wear out 2-3 controllers per year.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n年間2~3台のコントローラを 使い切る傾向があります\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私たちは非常に重く、年間2〜3台のコントローラーを着用する傾向があります。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 2. Na věšáku visí sako s hmotností 1,5 kg a v jeho kapse je peněženka s hmotností 0,2 kg.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nНа підвісник висить куртка вагою 1,5 кг, а в кишені - гаманець вагою 0,2 кг.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n2. На вішалці висить піджак вагою 1,5 кг, а в його кишені є гаманець вагою 0,2 кг.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 金正恩総書記が、朝鮮人民軍創建75周年に際して、人民軍将官の宿所を祝賀訪問した\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nGeneral Secretary Kim Jong-un paid a celebratory visit to the residence of a general of the Korean People's Army on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the founding of the Korean People's Army.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nOn the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the founding of the Korean People's Army, Kim Jong Un congratulated the general of the Korean People's Army on his visit to the residence of the general of the Korean People's Army\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It may be difficult to prepare these tables.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこれらのテーブルを用意するのは難しいかもしれません.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nこれらのテーブルを準備するのは難しいかもしれません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Dog chewed up the first one, husband kneeled on the screen of the second one, and the third ones still working but there’s an elbow mark in the middle of the touch screen also courtesy of the hubby...bought this one as a back up and the screens great but the battery it came with holds a charge maybe for a couple days.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n犬が最初のものを噛みしめ,夫が2番目の画面にひざまずき, 3番目のものはまだ動いているが,タッチスクリーンの中央に肘の痕跡がある.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n狗咀嚼了第一个,丈夫跪在屏幕上的第二个,和第三个仍然在工作,但有一个肘部标记在触摸屏的中间也是丈夫的礼貌...买了这个作为一个备份和屏幕伟大,但电池它来保持充电也许几天.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ※高温多湿な場所での保管は品質低下の原因になりますので避けてください。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAvoid storage in hot and humid places.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n※Please avoid storing in a high temperature and humid place because it will cause quality decline.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Also das ist nun wirklich nix neues, ist bei jedem elektronischen Ticket so. Checkin/checkout is da ne andere Hausnummer.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nSo, this is really nothing new, it's like with every electronic ticket. checkin / checkout is a different house number.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nSo that's really nothing new, it's the same with every electronic ticket. /checkout is from another house number.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: In part, because they'd be taught badly.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n教え方が悪いというのもある。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n部分原因是他们受到的教育很糟糕。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The eight-eyed Repnids seem to be watching as you settle the flyer down on the red soil, but they make no move towards you, in fact they are motionless as you climb out of the flyer and walk slowly towards them.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n八つの目のレプニドは、あなたがチラシを赤土の上に置くのを見ているように見えますが、あなたに向かって動きません。実際には、チラシから出てゆっくりと歩いても動きません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n赤土の上に着陸するのを八つ目のRepnidsが見ているような気がするが、こちらに近づいてくることはなく、それどころか、フライヤーから降りてゆっくり歩み寄っても、じっとしている。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I would also appeal to anyone who was driving in the area and who may have dash-cam footage which could assist our investigation to contact us.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこの地区で運転していた人... 捜査を支援するダッシュカメラの映像があれば...\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nまた、その地域を運転していた人や、捜査に役立つドライブレコーダーの映像を持っている可能性のある人にも、私たちに連絡するよう呼び掛けます。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: That vessel is off-limits.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nあの船は立ち入り禁止だ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n那艘船是禁区。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Fix those minor issues, and then can we have more of these please?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこれらのマイナーな問題を修正してから、これらをもっと増やすことができます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n解决这些小问题，然后我们可以有更多的这些吗？\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But I think that whenever I see a word, I put it into my memory and my memory is not a linear thing, but it's more like a bag.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、言葉を見るといつでも記憶に入れ、記憶は線形ではないと思いますが、バッグのようなものです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしかし、私は言葉を見るたびに、私はそれを私の記憶に入れて、私の記憶は線形のものではなく、それはより多くのバッグのようなものだと思います。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Klein aber oho! Ich habe mir dieses Produkt gekauft damit ich am iPad (Pro) einen Audio Ausgang habe sowie ein Display anschließen kann. Mit IOS 12 kann man nun auch Daten hin und her schieben. Dies funktioniert sehr gut. Des weiteren war die Audioausgabe wie erwartet. Andere Adapter welche ich auch schon zurück schicken musste konnten dies leider nicht. Praktisch ist der HDMI Ausgang. Ich habe nun einen PS4 Controller per BT am Tablet und das der HDMI am TV. Gleichzeitiges Laden ist kein Problem. Ton wird über HDMI geliefert. Für was nutze ich noch meine PlayStation :P Es lag ein kleiner Adapter bei welcher am Tablet befestigt werden kann. Dieser soll Stabilität bringen und hat auch eine magnetische Halterung. Mit meiner Hülle passt das nicht mit dem Adapter. Naja hält auch so sicher und hat Kontakt von daher... Alles im allen zwar etwas teuer jedoch durch den vollen Funktionsumfang gerechtfertigt. Dazu noch sehr klein das ganze und in einem Aluminium Stück stabil gefertigt. Preis Leistung passt.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI bought this product so I can connect an audio output and a display to the iPad (Pro). With iOS 12 you can now also push data back and forth. This works very well. Furthermore, the audio output was as expected. Other adapters I had to send back could not do this, unfortunately. Practically, the HDMI output. I now have a PS4 controller via BT on the tablet and the HDMI on the TV. Simultaneous charging is no problem. Audio is delivered via HDMI. What I use my PlayStation P for: There was a small adapter that can be attached to the tablet. This is supposed to bring stability and also a magnetic support. My case does not fit the adapter. Well, it also keeps in contact and therefore is safe... Everything, however, is very expensive because it fits in the middle of all the wireless devices. Aluminum performance is still very justified in a small price.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nbut small oho! I bought this product so that I can have an audio output on the iPad (Pro) as well as connect a display. With IOS 12 you can now also push data back and forth. This works very well. Furthermore, the audio output was as expected. Unfortunately, other adapters which I had to send back could not do this. The HDMI output is practical. I now have a PS4 Controller for BT on my tablet and the HDMI one on my TV. multaneous loading is not a problem. Tone is delivered via HDMI. What else do I use my PlayStation :P There is a small adapter that can be attached to the tablet. This is supposed to bring stability and also has a magnetic holder. With my case it doesn't fit with the adapter. Naja also keeps so safe and has contact from that... Although all of them are a bit expensive, they are justified by the full range of functions. In addition, the whole is very small and stably manufactured in an aluminum piece. Performance price passt.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: PLUS, the pockets for the credit cards are too big.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nさらに、クレジットカード用のポケットが大きすぎます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nさらに、クレジットカードのポケットが大きすぎます。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 自宅用のホームルーターをお探しの方必見！\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nMust see if you're looking for a residential-use home router!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIf you are looking for a home router for your home, this is a must-see!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 全作品試し読みアリ・買うよりお得。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAll works have a free trial - it's more cost-effective than buying.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAll items are available for free.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ネット予約は電話予約よりもお得！\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nOnline reservations are cheaper than telephone reservations.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nOnline reservation is more advantageous than telephone reservation!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: そうですね。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThat's right.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nYes, that's true.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The coat arrived in a vacuum sealed bag so it needs to be hung up for a few days to let wrinkles come out and to \"puff up\" a bit.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n需要挂上几天, 让纹出来,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n这件外套装在一个真空密封袋中，所以需要挂几天才能让皱纹出来并“膨胀”一点。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Zamézt a setřít schodiště před bytem směrem dolů.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nУникайте та витирайте сходи перед квартирою.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЗамести і потерти сходи перед квартирою вниз.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 口コミで好評／サントリーが開発した脚サプリ！\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt is well received by word of mouth / legs supplement developed by Suntory!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPopular by word of mouth / Leg supplement developed by Suntory.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Bisher hatte mir die Elektrik-Reihe von E. L. Todd am besten gefallen, jedoch wurde meine Meinung mit diesem Buch revidiert. Die ersten zwei Bücher fand ich sehr stark und auch empfehlenswert und hatte mich wirklich sehr auf den dritten Teil gefreut. In dem Teil gehts die ganze Zeit um die Gefühle von Volt und Taylor und ich fand es unnötig in die Länge gezogen. Taylor schwärmt schon so lange von Volt, gesteht sich endlich alles ein und ist dann bei jedem Streit wie ein kleines Kind und verzieht sich?! Gleichzeitig gab es auch Unstimmigkeiten, meines Empfindens, denn am Ende vom zweiten Teil hat Volt noch versucht Taylors Ex zu überzeugen und ihm nicht geglaubt als er sagte, Taylor würde auf ihn stehen und versucht den Ex zu überzeugen dass Taylor ohne ihn nicht könne und er es selber gehört habe. Aber am Anfang vom dritten Teil scheint Volt alles vergessen zu haben und kämpft um Taylor. Ich hatte gehofft, dass das der letzte Teil der Reihe ist und denke, dass dieser Teil der schwächste ist und auch gleichzeitig ziemlich unnötig. Ich werde trotzdem den vierten Teil lesen und hoffe das dann auch endlich rauskommt, das Taylors Freundin Sarah die Ex von Volt ist. Das würde wieder mehr Spannung in die Geschichte bringen.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nSo far, I had liked the electrics series by E. L. Todd best, but my opinion has been revised with this book. I found the first two books very strong and also recommendable and was really looking forward to the third part. The part is about Volt and Taylor's feelings all the time and I found it unnecessarily drawn-out. Taylor has been raving about Volt for so long, finally admitting everything to herself and then being like a little child in every argument and grimacing?! At the same time, there were also discrepancies, in my opinion, because at the end of the second part Volt tried to convince Taylor's ex and didn't believe him when he said Taylor would like him and tried to convince the ex that Taylor couldn't do without him and that he heard it himself. But at the beginning of the third part, Volt seems to have forgotten everything and fights for Taylor. I was hoping that this would be the last part of the series and I think that this part is the weakest and at the same time quite unnecessary. I will still read the fourth part and hope that it will finally come out that Taylor's girlfriend Sarah is Volt's ex. That would bring more suspense back into the story.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nSo far, the electric series of E. L. Todd best liked, however, my opinion was revised with this book. The first two books I found very strong and also recommendable and had really been looking forward to the third part. The part goes all the time around the feelings of Volt and Taylor and I found it unnecessarily drawn out. Taylor has been raving about Volt for so long, finally confesses everything and is then in every dispute like a little child and warps?! At the same time there were disagreements, my feeling, because at the end of the second part Volt still tried to convince Taylor's ex and did not believe him when he said Taylor would stand on him and try to convince the ex that Taylor could not without him and he had heard it himself. But at the beginning of the third part, Volt seems to have forgotten everything and is fighting for Taylor. I was hoping that was the last part of the series and I think that part is the weakest and also quite unnecessary at the same time. I will still read the fourth part and hope that finally comes out, that Taylor's girlfriend Sarah is the ex of Volt. That would bring more tension back to history.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ※本来の用途以外には使用しないでください。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nPlease do not use it for anything other than its intended purpose.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPlease do not use it for anything other than its intended purpose.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Fine, we have lots of those around.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n好吧，我们周围有很多。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n好,我们有很多周围的人。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Now Grady is back, and he's not leaving, and he's doing everything in his power to prove to her why he left, and that he's not giving her up this time around.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n他正在尽一切可能向她证明他为什么离开,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n现在格雷迪回来了，他不会再离开，他正在尽其所能向她证明他为什么离开，以及他这次不会放弃她。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The \"MusicLM Demo\" is mildly interesting.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\"MusicLM Demo\"稍微有点有趣。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n\"MusicLM Demo\"有点儿有趣。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Nicholas is working with farmers to reduce pesticide use while finding ways to address the issues caused by climate change and pests such as fall armyworm, which can devastate maize crops.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nニコラスは、気候変動やトウモロコシ作物を荒廃させる可能性のある秋の虫などの害虫によって引き起こされる問題に対処する方法を見つけながら、農薬の使用を減らすために農家と協力しています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n尼古拉斯正在与农民合作, 减少农药的使用,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Jednou z nespokojených akademiček je také Markéta Balcarová, která pátým rokem učí germanistiku na Západočeské univerzitě v Plzni.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nОдна з незадоволених викладачів - Маркета Бальчарова, яка вже п'ятий рік викладає німецьку мову в Університеті Західної Богемії в Пльзені.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nОднією з незадоволених академік є Маркета Балкарова, яка вже п'ятий рік викладає німецьку мову в Університеті Західної Богемії в Пльзені.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I'm not especially happy with killing them, but I won't be taking comments on the ethics of killing mice.)\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n倫理的な点についてはコメントは受けません)\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我对杀死他们不是特别高兴，但我不会对杀死老鼠的道德问题发表评论。）\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It is a complete PITA.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこれは完全なPITAです.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそれは完全なピタです。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Parents, including reality TV star and longtime Balenciaga fan - and brand partner - Kim Kardashian, spoke out against the brand and its \"disturbing images\" on social media.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nリアリティTVスターと長年のバレンシアガファンを含む両親 - とブランドパートナー - キム・カルダシアンは、ブランドとソーシャルメディア上のその「邪魔なイメージ」に対して話しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n父母,包括现实电视明星和长期的Balenciaga粉丝——以及品牌合作伙伴——KimKardashian,在社交媒体上对该品牌及其\"令人不安的形象\"表示强烈反对。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He's not.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそうじゃないわ\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n他不是.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But gentling despair at our messiness is crucial - because it gives us more space to tackle the ruins all around.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、私たちの乱雑さに対する優しさは重要です - なぜなら、それが私たちに周囲の廃墟に取り組むためのより多くのスペースを与えるからです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n但对我们的混乱感到温和的绝望是至关重要的——因为它给了我们更多的空间来处理周围的废墟。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And we are going to create new sentences from the text-only language model by adding the sound part to that, so that the language model will be better for the ASR, and the robustness to different speakers would be also better.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそして、文字のみの言語モデルに音声部分を追加して、我々はそこから新たな文章を作成するつもりでね、言語モデルのほうが自動音声認識にとってはいいだろうし、さまざまな話し手に対するロバスト性もよくなるだろう。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我们将通过添加声音部分，从纯文本语言模型中创建新句子，以便语言模型对ASR更好，并且对不同说话者的鲁棒性也会更好。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Over time dart became my go-to for quick UI.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n時間が経つにつれて、ダーツはクイックUIの頼りになるものになりました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n随着时间的推移， dart成为我的首选快速UI。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Last week got a ton done and feeling much better about field items.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n先週はトンを終え、フィールドアイテムについてはるかに良い感じを得ました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n先週はたくさんのことを成し遂げ、フィールドアイテムについてはるかに気分が良くなりました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 原則的には、pin配列や電圧や周波数等の規格が一致していれば一緒に使える事にはなっています。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIn principle, if standards such as pin arrays, voltages and frequencies are matched, they can be used together.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIn principle, it can be used together if the pin sequence, voltage, frequency, etc. are consistent.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: This affected the strength of the 1-piece plastic frame the surrounds the Tab A, so now the rubber outer cover feels really flexible and flimsy.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nその結果、タブAを囲む1ピースのプラスチック製フレームの強度が低下し、ゴム製のアウターカバーが実に柔軟で薄っぺらく感じられるようになった。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n所以现在外套是很,感觉很脆弱.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: There's a lot of well good stuff in this mysterious collective's backlog.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこの謎の集団の 欠陥の良いものがたくさんある\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n沢山の 素晴らしいものが この謎の集団の 埋もれた資料の中にあります\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Very disappointing since my return window has expired.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n戻る期間が過ぎたので とても残念です.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私の帰りのウィンドウが期限切れになっているので、非常に残念。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, [PERSON8], when working with [PERSON5] and when documenting what the setups are, make sure it is tested well enough by colleagues, such as [PERSON4] or even [PERSON9] for the language model checks and everybody else.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそのため 、 [ PERSON8] では 、 [ PERSON5] で作業する場合や、設定内容を記録する場合は 、 [ PERSON4] や [PERSON9] のように、言語モデルのチェックなど、同僚によって十分にテストされていることを確認してください。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n所以，[PERSON8]，在与[PERSON5]合作和记录设置时，确保它被同事，如[PERSON4]或甚至[PERSON9]进行了足够的语言模型检查和其他人的测试。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I tried reading it but I just found the language flat.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n読んでみましたが、言語がフラットであることがわかりました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我尝试阅读它，但发现语言平淡。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Out of all of those phone's, not once did I ever had any problems with the phone's themselves.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私は,電話に問題を抱えたことは一度もありません.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nこれらの電話のうち、一度も電話自体に問題があったことはありませんでした。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Pros: First, they clamp easily onto my shelf, and bend to many positions allowing me to make changes as my plants grow.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n利点: まず,簡単に棚に張り付けられるので 複数の位置に曲がることで 植物の成長に合わせて 変えました\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n优点：首先，它们可以轻松地夹在我的架子上，并且可以弯曲到许多位置，使我可以随着植物的生长进行调整。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The FAI Cup holders defeated last season's league winners at the Brandywell thanks to first-half goals from Will Patching and Michael Duffy.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nFAIカップのホルダーは、ウィル・パッティングとマイケル・ダフィーの前半のゴールにより、ブランディウェルで昨季リーグ優勝を果たした。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nFAIカップの保持者は、Will PatchingとMichael Duffyの前半のゴールのおかげで、ブランディウェルで昨シーズンのリーグ優勝者を破りました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He said that the layout of the tombs are T-shaped, a style commonly used in tombs from the 18th dynasty.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n彼は、墓のレイアウトはT字型で、第18王朝の墓で一般的に使用されているスタイルであると言いました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n墓中各处都是以T字体的形式布置,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: In our day-to-day lives, we're constantly looking for ways to increase our energy and avoid burnout, especially in our jobs.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n日々の生活の中で、私たちは常にエネルギーを増やし、特に仕事で燃え尽きないようにする方法を探しています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私たちの日常生活では、特に仕事でエネルギーを増やし、燃え尽きないようにする方法を常に模索しています。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Days later, Balenciaga released a statement apologizing for the photos and outlining the changes it would implement to avoid similar \"mistakes\" in the future.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n数日後、Balenciagaは写真に対して謝罪の声明を発表し、将来同様の「ミス」を避けるために実施する変更を概説しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n几天后, 巴伦西亚加发布了一份声明,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Collins thought she was finally getting everything she dreamed of, her brothers best friend... but when she woke up alone the next morning, and never heard from her, things definitely changed.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nコリンズは、彼女がついに彼女が夢見ていたすべてを手に入れたと思った、彼女の兄弟の親友...しかし、翌朝彼女が一人で目を覚まし、彼女から連絡がなかったとき、状況は間違いなく変わりました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n柯林斯认为她终于得到了她梦以求的一切, 她的兄弟最好的朋友...\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It worked.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n出来た。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n奏效了。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: センチュリー21 トラスト不動産 - 大泉学園駅 一軒家\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nCentury 21 Trust Property - One house at the station of the Koyasan School\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nCentury 21 Trust Real Estate - A House at Oizumi Gakuen Station\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I messed around for a little less than a week with this phone.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我用这款手机搞砸了不到一个星期。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我用这款手机花了不到一周的时间。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: My home is comfortable and wonderful and I am happy there, but I have to be somewhere else in order to chill enough to read fiction during the day without feeling guilty.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私の家は快適で素晴らしく、そこで幸せですが、罪悪感を感じることなく日中フィクションを読むのに十分な冷静さを保つためには、どこか別の場所にいなければなりません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私の家は快適で素晴らしく、そこで幸せですが、罪悪感を感じることなく日中フィクションを読むのに十分な冷静さを保つには、どこか別の場所にいなければなりません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 【紀伊御坊駅】のホテル・旅館を予約するならじゃらん。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nJalan for hotel or ryokan reservations near【Kii-Gobo Station】\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIf you book a hotel / Ryokan in [Kii-mobo Station] it is not possible.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: #Venting into the Fediverse time.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n#Venting フェデバータイムへ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n#发泄到Fediverse时间。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Polis stated that he wishes that more time was spent on the issue of immigration during the meeting of governors at the White House, but the issue \"came up.\"\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nポリスは、「ホワイトハウスの知事会議の間、移民の問題に、より多くの時間が費やされた」と、彼が希望したと述べましたが、問題は生じました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在白宫举行的州长会议上,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: <unintelligible/> silence, Czech, German, English, and then I will let on the others how they want to use it in the pipeline.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nチェコ語,ドイツ語,英語で 音声の使い方を伝えよう\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n<unintelligible/> silence、チェコ語、ドイツ語、英語、そしてそれから私は彼らがパイプラインでそれをどのように使いたいかを他の人に話します。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: コピー用紙\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nCopy paper\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\ncopier paper\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 5は途中までプレイしました。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI played up to the middle of 5.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n5 played until the middle.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Who would check every single cartridge when received????\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n受け取ったカートリッジをチェックするのは誰?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n誰が受け取ったときにすべての単一のカートリッジをチェックしますか???\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 出先で大汗かいてファミレスに逃げ込み、「大」で一気に冷却なんていうシーンに最適です。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt's perfect for the scene where you're sweating your way out of the house and running back to your family, and you're cooling off in a big way.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt is ideal for a scene where you sweat a lot on the go and escape to a family restaurant and cool down at once with \"Large\".\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The statement from Prigozhin, a millionaire who has close links to Russian President Vladimir Putin and was dubbed \"Putin's chef\" for his lucrative Kremlin catering contracts, marked a recognition of the difficulties that the Kremlin has faced in the campaign, which it initially expected to wrap up within weeks when Russian troops invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nロシア大統領ウラジーミル・プーチンと密接な関係があり、彼の有利なクレムリンのケータリング契約のために「プーチンのシェフ」と呼ばれた億万長者プリゴジンからの声明は、クレムリンがキャンペーンで直面している困難を認識しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPrigozhin 是一名百万富翁，与俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京关系密切，因其利润丰厚的克里姆林宫餐饮合同而被称为“普京的厨师”，他的声明标志着克里姆林宫认识到了竞选中面临的困难。在俄罗斯军队于 2 月 24 日入侵乌克兰时，最初预计竞选将在几周内结束。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Spring peas at Gilpin are showing up so trellise needs to be set.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nギルピンの春エンドウが顔を出しているので、棚を設置する必要があります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n吉尔平的春季豌豆正在出现，所以需要设置棚架。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Like to fail because you are unable to finish it.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n完走できないから失敗したい。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n喜欢失败，因为你无法完成它。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, it will be really multi-speaker sentences, and therefore the robustness to the different accents of these speakers could be also improved.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nだから、これは実際にはマルチ・スピーカーの文となり、従ってこれら話し手のさまざまなアクセントに対するロバスト性も向上するかもしれないんだ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n因此，这将是真正的多说话者句子，因此对这些说话者的不同口音的鲁棒性也可以得到提高。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: <unintelligible/> silence, Czech, German, English, and then I will let on the others how they want to use it in the pipeline.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n<unintelligible/> silence, Czech, German, English, and then I will let on the others how they want to use it in the pipeline. <unintelligible/> silence, Czech, German, English, and then I will let on the others how they want to use it in the pipeline. <unintelligible/> silence, Czech, German, English, and then I will let on the others how they want to use it in the pipeline. <unintelligible/> silence, Czech, German,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n<unintelligible/>沉默，捷克语，德语，英语，然后我会告诉其他人他们想如何在管道中使用它。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A družina je od skončení vyučování do čtyř hodin?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nА свита - від закінчення занять до чотирьох годин?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nА гурток триває від закінчення занять до чотирьох годин?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Absolutely!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n絶対!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n绝对喜欢！\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Especially with the competition.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n特に競争で。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n尤其是在竞争的情况下。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ※内容物、洗浄廃液や容器を廃棄する場合は、都道府県の許可を受けた専門の廃棄物処理業者に委託してください。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nFor the disposal of contents, washing, waste water and containers, please entrust the disposal to a professional waste disposal company licensed by the prefecture of Kitagawa.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nNote: When disposing of contents, cleaning effluent, or containers, please entrust it to a specialized waste disposal company authorized by the prefecture.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So it's at least unclear whether a former president can claim the privilege, saying nothing of whether the claim would succeed.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n権利の主張が成功するかどうかについては 何も言っていません. 権利の主張が成功するかどうかについては 何も言っていません.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしたがって、元大統領が特権を主張できるかどうかは少なくとも不明であり、主張が成功するかどうかは何も言わない。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He added that the war could go on for three years if Moscow decides to capture broader territories east of the Dnieper River.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n他补充说，如果莫斯科决定占领第聂伯河以东更广阔的领土，战争可能会持续三年。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n如果莫斯科决定夺取较宽的丹涅伯河以东的区域,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Have had probs with Hockey Balls.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nホッケーボールで問題があった\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n曾与曲棍球probs.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So while composting and bloom scrolling are a wonderful reminder to look up, and be aware of life beyond the screen.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n堆肥化と花のスクロールは、見上げるのに素晴らしいリマインダーであり、画面を超えて人生を認識しています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n因此，虽然堆肥和花朵滚动是一个很好的提醒，要抬头，并意识到屏幕之外的生活。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: don't believe the hype\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n誇大宣伝を信じないでください\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n誇大広告を信じないでください\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Provozovatelé však musejí zajistit pořádek, úklid a dodržování nočního klidu,“ vysvětlil starosta městské části Brno-střed, Ing. arch. Vojtěch Mencl. © (kad) (i Zpravodaj městské části Brno-střed | červen 2020 | 3\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nОднак оператори повинні забезпечити порядок, прибирання та дотримання нічного спокою, пояснив міський голова Брно-Центр, англ. Арх. Войцех Менкль. © (kad) (i Новини міста Брно-Центр | Червень 2020 | 3\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nОднак оператори повинні забезпечити порядок, прибирання та дотримання нічного спокою\", - пояснив міський голова Броварів, арх. Войцех Менкль. {(кад) (та Кореспондент Броварської міської ради | червень 2020 | 3.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I will have to leave now, because I need to give the kids lunch and so on.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n子供たちに昼食をあげないと\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n今すぐ出かけなければなりません、なぜなら子供たちに昼食を与えたりする必要があるからです。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 日本の82年生まれならば彼女よりは多少社会状況は良くなっているかもしれないが、男女雇用均等法が施行されたからといって均等とは程遠い状況はいまだ続いている。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nHaving been born in Japan in 1982, I feel the social situation is somewhat better than that of the protagonist, but even though the equal employment act has been implemented, the reality is that equality is still a long way off.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIf you were born in 1982 in Japan, the social situation may be somewhat better than her, but the situation is still far from equal because of the enforcement of the Equal Employment Law for Women.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: After 4,000 of distress Yl finds herself in a place of love and is having huge feels she doesn't know what to do with so there's a lot of both.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそして,愛に満ちている場所を見つけた. 大きくてどうするかはわからず,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在4000的痛苦之后，Yl发现自己在一个爱的地方，并且有巨大的感觉，她不知道该怎么办，所以两者都有很多。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Dog chewed up the first one, husband kneeled on the screen of the second one, and the third ones still working but there’s an elbow mark in the middle of the touch screen also courtesy of the hubby...bought this one as a back up and the screens great but the battery it came with holds a charge maybe for a couple days.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n犬が最初のものを噛み、夫が2番目のものの画面にひざまずき、3つ目はまだ機能していますが、タッチスクリーンの中央に肘の跡があります。これも夫の厚意によるものです... これはバックアップとして購入し、画面は素晴らしいですが、付属のバッテリーはおそらく数日間充電できます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n犬は最初のものを噛んだ、夫は第二のものの画面にひざまずいた、そして第三のものはまだ働いているが、夫の礼儀もタッチスクリーンの真ん中に肘の印..これは、バックアップとして購入し、画面は素晴らしいが、それが付属しているバッテリーは、多分数日間の電荷を保持しています。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: „Podle původního plánu neměla mí ská škola prázdninový provoz.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\"За початковим планом, моя школа не мала працювати на канікулах.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n«Згідно з початковим планом, у моїй школі не було святкової операції.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ※幼児や子供がかぶって遊ぶと窒息などの危険がありますのでご注意ください。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n*Caution, toddlers and children may suffocate if they place the bags over their heads to play.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n* Please note that there is a risk of suffocation if infants and children play with it.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Lost package - Re-Charged me\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nLost package - 再充電\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n丢失的包裹 - 再次收费我\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Doch nicht nur am Rentenalter will die Regierung schrauben. Die bereits vor Jahren beschlossene Anhebung der nötigen Einzahldauer für eine volle Rente soll beschleunigt werden. Außerdem sollen Einzelrentensysteme mit Privilegien für bestimmte Berufsgruppen abgeschafft werden. Die Mindestrente soll auf etwa 1200 Euro steigen.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe government is not only seeking to reduce the retirement age, but also to speed up the increase in the minimum period of contributions for a full pension, which was decided on years ago, to abolish individual pension schemes with privileges for certain occupational groups, and to raise the minimum pension to about EUR 1200.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nBut not only at the retirement age, the government wants to screw. The increase in the necessary deposit period for a full pension, which was decided years ago, should be accelerated. In addition, individual pension schemes with privileges for certain occupational groups are to be abolished. The minimum pension should rise to about 1200 euros.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON2) Yeah, when it has short context and because I make decisions based on very short context for this very low latency, then it really commits to something that in, for example, a second or two, it figures out oh, well, actually this was bad translation.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(PERSON2)Yeah,whenithasshortcontextandbecauseImakedecisionsbasedonveryshortcontextforthisverylowlatency,thenitreallycommitstosomethingthatin,forexample,asecondortwo,itfiguresoutoh,well,actuallythiswasbadtranslation.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n(PERSON2)是的，当它有很短的上下文时，因为我根据很短的上下文来做决定，所以延迟非常低，然后它真的承诺了一些东西，例如，在一两秒钟内，它弄清楚了哦，嗯，实际上这是糟糕的翻译。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: As the car changes, so does Arnie, whose newfound confidence turns to arrogance behind the wheel of his exotic beauty.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n車が変わるにつれて、その新しい自信は彼のエキゾチックな美しさの車輪の後ろの傲慢さに変わります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n随着汽车的变化，阿尼也发生了变化，他在驾驶他的异国美女时，新发现的自信变成了傲慢。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 諸事情で工事が出来ない為、Wi-Fi6じゃなくちゃそれほど意味ないのは充分知ってるのでその上で\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI know full well that it doesn't make much sense if it's not Wi-Fi 6 because I can't do the construction for various reasons, so on top of that.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nBecause we can't work due to various reasons, we know enough that it doesn't mean much unless it is Wi-Fi6, so on top\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The compressed time frame from May 10 to the 26th was well presented with the clock 7 turning pages...\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n5月10日から26日までの圧縮された時間枠は、時計7がページをめくることでよく提示されました...\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n5月10日から26日までの圧縮された時間枠は、時計7がページをめくる様子と共にうまく表現されました...\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 奄美空港の脱炭素化に向け話し合った推進協議会＝９日、奄美市笠利町\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe Amami Airport Promotion Council, which discussed decarbonization of the airport, held a meeting on June 9 in Kasari-cho, Amami City.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe council discusses the decarbonization of Amami Airport. (Mainichi/Kasari)\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So <parallel_talk> have an explicit list of things which must not appear in the output </parallel_talk>, right?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしたがって、<Parallel_talk> には、出力</ parallel_talk> に現れてはならないものの明示的なリストがあります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n所以<parallel_talk>有一个明确的列表，列出了输出</parallel_talk>中不能出现的内容，对吗？\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just word 'Chosen: A' or 'Chosen: B'.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nReply strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The end is swift, as several pairs of fangs inject their deadly venom and the air of Dyskra contaminates your lungs.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n致命的な毒を注入し ディスカラの空気は 肺を汚染します\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n结局很快，因为几对毒牙会注入致命的毒液，戴斯克拉的空气会污染你的肺部。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Chosen: B", "role": "assistant" } ]