Datasets:
MLP-SEMO
/
CSR_datasets

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
2
sentence
stringlengths
3
2.65k
Now in in India, the in- laws usually drive away the daughter- in- law if she fails to give them an heir !
So the wife hits upon a major plan - surrogate mother...
but the scientists intervened - "Sure artificial insemination" - NO said the artist (Director actually) - "Neighbourhood will come to know that the daughter - in - law is barren so they are going for surrogate mother !!
Neighbours !
society !!
gosh the same ones who watch Fashion TV day and night - watching girls between the age group of 14 to 40 ...
al in bras and panties - well those neighbors suddenly take an upper hand in family planning and decision making !!
SO the wife sends away her husband to a beer bar where girls are dancing on the stage - all mostly uneducated and illiterate - but men love such women as they can satisfy their egos a lot !
He hires the lead dancer in the pub - asks her to bear his baby - in exchange for money - she agrees - she comes home - becomes pregnant - wife and kept - both co-exist in the same house - in the mean time the prostitute also gets a taste of household life - so much caring people around - she misses them all and cries silently !!
In the mean time - no one in the family comes to know that the real daughter in law is roaming around with a pillow beneath her petticoat !!
- the mother or other elderly people never took her for check-ups - nor did they try to feel the baby's movements in the womb !!
This movie is traditional bollywood fare as far as the star power, sentimentality and love triangle of emotions.
What really bothered me about this movie was the makers' absurd notion of surrogate mother.
A whore who conceives a child with someone after have sex with the man (of the family desiring a child) is not a surrogate mother.
Neither is she a good candidate for a surrogate mother.
I have seen Indian movies and television shows that made 10 to 15 years ago that dealt with this issue more intelligently.
The whole concept of the movie is ridiculous and absolutely implausible.
I realize that most bollywood movies aren't meant to be plausible, but they don't pretend to be either.
This movie wants us to emote along with the characters, but this can't done with such a ridiculous, contrived conflict.
I would have expected better from Abbas and Mustan.
I wonder if there is any sense of sense in this movie.
Its a big joke.
Good..
Its entertaining ..
You get to see the most stupid plot played very seriously in the form of a film ..
I wonder which audience group this movie is basically targeted to.
Priety (a pros) plays a surrogate mom for a happy couple Salman/Rani who want a child but can't.
I wonder how it would be if this drama was a real-life take-off from a real couple's life.
Rani appears happy with another pretty lady in her house who has been brought in to make a child for her & Salman.
She cares for Priety and tries pushing her husband Salman to Preity so they may have some romance.
When will the audience get fed up of Salman's nakhras.
Though a good past-time, this movie is unbearable.
Absurd.
The TV guide calls this movie a mystery.
What is a mystery to me is how is it possible that a culture that can produce such intricate and complex classical music and brilliant mathematicians cannot produce a single film that would rise above the despicable trash level this film so perfectly represents.
This is Bollywood at its best/worst, I honestly cannot tell the difference.
Nauseatingly sweet, kitschy clichés on every level, story-line, situations, dialog, music and choreography.
To put it bluntly, you must be a retard to enjoy it.
I watched it to satisfy my cultural curiosity, but there were times when I had to walk away from it, because I could not take it any more.
The only redeeming quality of the movie is the exquisite beauty of the leading actresses.
...
but the keyword here is "usually."
I have been known to adore movies EVERYONE thinks are dumb.
But in the world of B-rated movies, THIS one is Z-rated.
Absolutely ridiculous.
The thing I respect about most of my favorite B-rated movies are that they don't take themselves too seriously.
The makers of movies like that sort-of treat the movie lightly, even if it's a heavy topic.
I get the impression, however, that the producers of this movie took themselves way to seriously, like they were putting together a 10-star classic, complete with poor attempts at poignant lines and dumb camera shots.
Nevertheless, despite all this, I STILL gave it 4 out of 10 stars, as I am biased towards movies like this.
If you're a B-rated fan, however, I would try too hard to find this one.
Don't even ask me why I watched this!
The only excuse I can come up with that I was sick with Bronchitis and too weak to change the channel.
:) It's too terrible for words, the movie that is, not the Bronchitis.
The acting is deplorable, Richard Grieco hams it up as a trigger-happy, gun-slinging serial killer with a penchant for knocking off cops.
Nick Mancuso phones in a performance as the cop on his trail and Nancy Allen manages to put in the only sympathetic role in the entire film.
The script is dismal, peppered with clichéd lines, "Are you ready, Pardner?"
purrs Richard Grieco to every single one of his victims.
Dire.
Avoid.
The French film "Extension Du Domaine De La Lutte" directed by iconoclast film maker Philippe Harel is based on the book of the same name written by a controversial writer Michel Houellebecq.
He has also worked on this film's scenario.
According to British cinema magazine Sight and Sound,it is also known as "Whatever."
This film has been hailed as a breath of fresh air for French cinema due to its not so common theme of sexual politics and its implications on two stupid information technology workers.
The film is marred by its much too evident voice over which introduces us to the main character.
This makes us viewers feel as if we are watching a book that is bring read.
The basic premise of problems related to loneliness due to chronic sexual drought is fine but the film goes out of hand once the hero starts recounting the misery faced by him and his friend.
Instead of sticking to its main topic the film veers in other directions leading to its downfall.
Beware:some women viewers might find not only the film but even its two heroes as moronic misogynists.
Two years ago, on Berlin Film Festival we watched the Amos Kollek movie "Sue" in the Panorama program, with a wonderful Anna Thomson in the leading part.
It's a film about loneliness and sex, and how the one thing is compensated by the other.
In the same section on the Festival now we have to complain the superfluous antithesis of Sue, "Extension du domaine de la lutte", which now tries to convince us that loneliness and having NO sex is one and the same problem.
But unfortunately we can't sympathize with "our hero" (how he is called by the story-teller), because he is unnecessarily and incomprehensibly tired of company and himself.
Own fault, I'm sorry.
I can't understand him.
Not enough, the writer/director/actor want us admitting to him, that it's not his destroyed self-consciousness or the passivity of his personality, what brought him so far, but the rotten society and its image of sexuality.
Yes, there are some deeper insights about gender relations, but we won't follow him so far...
And the point is, that there is rather any sign of reflection about his own portion to the fate, having no sex.
Who didn't notice yet, it's a quite depressing film...
In the beginning, there had been some starts to be more accurate in sketching the situation.
At the bed store the "hero" speaks about the hindrances buying a new bed.
Perhaps it's too broad getting up the stairs, you have to stay at home half a day...
THIS is a satire about a character, who doesn't know taking the life and heart in hands, DOING something...
The movie doesn`t follow this path, but handles his characters with helplessness.
Nobody believes, that "our hero" is able to instigate Tisserand for a murder.
Too dull, too kind, too - passive (not to mention Tisserand's complex;
he has an inhibition, but he couldn't be, of course, a murderer of women!).
To finish: There are women and the world, it's not a device of a modern sexualized society.
Help you as you can, but don't follow the messages and the "wisdom" of this movie, which announces bankruptcy to human relationships, without seizing the real conflicts within.
Blank check is one of those kids movies that could have been a great suspense thriller for the kids but instead it's a tired lame home alone ripoff that isn't worth a dime.
Quigley is a criminal who just escaped from jail and gets his hidden million dollars from a big score and then we meet Preston a frustrated kid whose room is taken over by his brothers to start a business and obviously dad treats his brothers better because they make money the same day he goes to a kid's birthday party and since his dad is a cheapo he goes on little kids rides while the other kids go on roller coasters then he receives a birthday card and a check of 11 bucks how cheap is this family?
So he goes to the bank to open an account and meets the gorgeous Shea Stanley were her parents mets fans?
he finds out he needs 200 to open a account meanwhile quigley gives his million to his banker friend and finds out the bills are marked so he will send a lackey named juice to get the unmarked ones when Preston leaves his bike gets run over by quigley he's about to write a check when he spots the cops and bolts back home his parents scolded him about his busted up bike and gets grounded what?
their kid got almost run over and they worried about a bike?
So Preston forges a million dollar check via his computer and comes back only to be escorted to the banker thinking that he's juice he gives Preston the money but the real juice came and realized they been duped by a kid!
So Preston buys a mansion under the name Macintosh gets a limo driver who says unfunny jokes and goes on a epic shopping spree then he spots Shea and talks about opening his account kid you're loaded and you're talking about opening an account?
We soon realized Shea is actually an FBI agent tracking down quigley and his two other accomplice's then he told his cheapy dad he's got a job working for Mr Macintosh and spends the day riding go karts playng vr games and hanging out with his limo driver buddy then he goes out on a date with Shea in a fancy restaurant what a 10 year old wining and dining a 20 something FBI agent?
Afterwards he takes her to a street geyser and playing around in the water messing up Shea's 300 dollar dress yet she takes it well if this was a bit realistic she would slap him for messing up her expensive dress so quigley and the others still mad interrogates a little kid and quickly spills the beans and Preston is being chased by quigley in a scene taken from the original script and afterwords he is hosting Mr Macintoshs birthday which is really his birthday when he discovers he couldn't pay for the party he sits in his chair and dad talks to MacIntosh which he doesn't know it's his son he's talking to and talks about Preston should be a real kid and has his whole childhood ahead of him and wants Preston to go home early what?
an hour ago you were grilling him about his finances!
so Preston asks everyone to leave and sits alone pondering when quigley and the others break in to the house to make Preston pay and so he faces then in a finale that rips off home alone quigley gets spun around in a ball while Preston is driving a go kart juice gets hit in the groin and more antics ensue until the trio get Preston cornered and when it seem all hope is lost Shea and a bunch of SWAT guys come to save the day and so quigley and his crew get sent to jail but is there any hope for Preston and Shea?
there is and she kisses him in the lips what?