MLP-SEMO/CSR_datasets · Datasets at Hugging Face

sentence stringlengths 3 2.65k
Finally the film express sexual relationship of Alex, kik, Sandu their triangle love were full of intenseness, frustration and jealous, at last, Alex waked up and realized that they would not have result and future.
Ending up was sad.
The director Tudor Giurgiu was in AMC theatre on Sunday 12:00PM on 08/10/06, with us watched the movie together.
After the movie he told the audiences that the purposed to create this film which was to express the sexual relationships of Romanian were kind of complicate.
On my point of view sexual life is always complicated in everywhere, I don't feel any particular impression and effect from the movie.
The love proceeding of Alex and Kiki, and Kiki and her brother Sandu were kind of next door neighborhood story.
The two main reasons I don't like this movie are, firstly, the film didn't told us how they started to fall in love?
Sounds like after Alex moved into the building which Kiki was living, then two girls are fall in love.
It doesn't make sense at all.
How a girl would fall in love with another girl instead of a man.
Too much fragments, you need to image and connect those stories by your mind.
Secondly, The whole film didn't have a scene of Alex and Kik's sexual intercourse, that 's what I was waiting for .
However, it still had some parts were deserved to recommend.
The "ear piercing " part was kind of interesting.
Alex was willing to suffer the pain of ear piercing to appreciate kik's love.
That was a touching scene which gave you a little idea of their love.
Also, the scene of they were lying in the soccer field, the conversation express their loves were truthful and passionate.
Considering that this movie had a serious and quite successful launching campaign, I would have expected something to be worth the fuzz...
from the opening scene on (in which the two brothers "sensually" caress each other, laying naked in a bed) it goes rapidly downwards...
nothing to get the attention, not a mind-catching thing in the whole plot, baaad baad acting (a few minor exceptions, but artificiality is at its best).
Incest and lesbianism are promising themes, but the script analyses none of the two in depth ( mind that a possible excuse of the makers, saying that they aimed for a subtle movie would be hilarious, unless subtle and superficial mean the same thing...
The too curious viewers will not get any interesting scene...
at this point, that could have saved some of the movie...
so you can imagine how bad it is.
Many other things could be said...
but please watch the movie yourselves...
I am an egoist and I would like as many people as possible to waste about 1 1/2h of their lives...
like I did :(
Yes, indeed, it could have been a good movie.
A love biangle, (sorry for the poetical license, but is not a triangle!) an interesting story, unfortunately badly told.
The image is sometimes weird, sometimes OK, the picture looks crowded and narrow-sighted.
The sound needs more attention (it usually does in Romanian movies), the light and color filters are sometimes badly chosen.
The soundtrack is short and is not helping the action.
About the acting...
sorry but the best actress is the landlady.
The others are acting immaturely and cannot convince the viewer.
The acting is poetical when it should be realistic, and realistic when it should be poetical.
It's a picture for adults, told by the children.
Bother only if extremely curious.
Closer to reality and containing more depth than "Breakdance", Stan Lathan's "Beat Street" is still a pretty dull show.
Again this pic is really only cashing in on the 'breakin' craze but at least we get a little bit of entertainment from the plot, which concerns the lives of three young friends and a younger brother, all growing up in Queens, New York.
Each has their own unique talent.
One is a hustler, one a d.j., another an artist who creates 'burners', while little bro' Lee is a hot 'hip hop' dancer.
Lathan is unable to generate any real audience interest in the story though, and his young cast are likewise struggling with their characters.
Therefore it is left almost entirely to the funky music and the 'fresh' dancing to save the day.
Choreography is again sharp for both club and street scenes, but this alone is not enough to lift ""Beat Street" to greater heights.
Unfortunately the film really falls flat late on, after showing a glimmer of hope that it just might get interesting.
Sunday, August 25, 1996 - Video
Hilariously obvious "drama" about a bunch of high school (I think) kids who enjoy non-stop hip-hop, break dancing, graffiti and trying to become a dj at the Roxy--or something.
To be totally honest I was so bored I forgot!
Even people who love the music agree this movie is terribly acted and--as a drama--failed dismally.
We're supposed to find this kids likable and nice.
I found them bland and boring.
The one that I REALLY hated was Ramon.
He does graffiti on subway trains and this is looked upon as great.
Excuse me?
He's defacing public property that isn't his to begin with.
Also these "great" kids tap into the city's electricity so they can hold a big dance party at an abandoned building.
Uh huh.
So we're supposed to find a bunch of law breakers lovable and fun.
I could forgive all that if the music was good but I can't stand hip hop.
The songs were--at best--mediocre and they were nonstop!
They're ALWAYS playing!
It got to the point that I was fast-forwarding through the many endless music numbers.
(Cut out the music and you haver a 30 minute movie--maybe) There are a few imaginative numbers--the subway dance fight, a truly funny Santa number and the climatic Roxy show.
If you love hip hop here's your movie.
But it you're looking for good drama mixed in--forget it.
Also HOW did this get a PG rating?
There's an incredible amount of swearing in this.
Maybe you shouldn't compare, but Wild Style and Style Wars are original Hip Hop.
Beat Street does have a lot of the original artists of early Hip Hop, but they've been obviously made clear that this could be their big break, of course for some it was and that's nice.
But if you view this as original Hip Hop Culture you're wrong.
It's overproduced and has a Hollywood sauce.
Rather look for the first two movies i mentioned.
They have convey the grittiness that comes with life in the ghetto.
Yes, the rating for this movie is low, but the reviews are mostly positive or even raving.
This is probably because although the story, the acting, the dialogues and the direction all are dreadful, the music and dancing is what the people love about it.
Me, i do love the dancing but at the time thought that electro was the death of Hip Hop (i was so glad when round '86 a new generation of now classic Hip Hop artists appeared, like Krs One, Public Enemy, Ultramagnetic Mc's, Jungle Brothers, Bizmarkie to name a few), and i still don't like most of the beats in this movie and that is why it doesn't work for me.
I mean, Wild Style has not much of a story but the music there is great and authentic.
Of course tastes differ and that's alright.
But as far as i'm concerned, this movie is trash except for the break dancing and some of the music and so i can't rate it higher than a 4 out of ten.
I could never stand watching Happy Days after Chachi joined the cast, so I knew I was in trouble when the best scene in this movie featured Scott Baio (a skateboard chase scene!).
Jodie Foster in her first "grown-up" role turns in her usual professional performance but that is no excuse for this boring mess.
Two hours out of my life that I'll never get back!
No noteworthy characters, unbelievable storyline, questionable editing and horrendous cinematography but worst of all, I couldn't have cared less.
The story of California teens in the 1970's, where the kids live miserable lives and all their parents are idiots.
Don't waste your time watching this ugly excuse for a movie.
Horrible film with bits of the Ramones strewn about.
Your worse than average 1970's/80's comedy format of the cool kids taking over the school with some whimsical plan.
This movie is terrible.
The plot consists of a girl who enjoys the Ramones and a school bent on fighting against their oppressive administration.
Forget this movie and watch something like Wild Zero starring Guitar Wolf if you want an entertaining B movie.
Terrible acting, terrible writing, terrible plot with the stamp of approval of the Ramones who probably needed some money quick so they said yes to this movie.
That is the only logical thing I can think of because this movie blows.
This movie is a 90 minute Ramones concert with brief periods of stupidity and absolute boredom.
What kind of high school is this anyway?
Unless you are a major Ramones fan, DO NOT and I repeat DO NOT waste your time like I did.
This is utterly unwatchable from start to finish.
This movie should be called Ramone Fever.
Everyone appears to like them in this movie.

Finally the film express sexual relationship of Alex, kik, Sandu their triangle love were full of intenseness, frustration and jealous, at last, Alex waked up and realized that they would not have result and future.

Ending up was sad.

The director Tudor Giurgiu was in AMC theatre on Sunday 12:00PM on 08/10/06, with us watched the movie together.

After the movie he told the audiences that the purposed to create this film which was to express the sexual relationships of Romanian were kind of complicate.

On my point of view sexual life is always complicated in everywhere, I don't feel any particular impression and effect from the movie.

The love proceeding of Alex and Kiki, and Kiki and her brother Sandu were kind of next door neighborhood story.

The two main reasons I don't like this movie are, firstly, the film didn't told us how they started to fall in love?

Sounds like after Alex moved into the building which Kiki was living, then two girls are fall in love.

It doesn't make sense at all.

How a girl would fall in love with another girl instead of a man.

Too much fragments, you need to image and connect those stories by your mind.

Secondly, The whole film didn't have a scene of Alex and Kik's sexual intercourse, that 's what I was waiting for .

However, it still had some parts were deserved to recommend.

The "ear piercing " part was kind of interesting.

Alex was willing to suffer the pain of ear piercing to appreciate kik's love.

That was a touching scene which gave you a little idea of their love.

Also, the scene of they were lying in the soccer field, the conversation express their loves were truthful and passionate.

Considering that this movie had a serious and quite successful launching campaign, I would have expected something to be worth the fuzz...

from the opening scene on (in which the two brothers "sensually" caress each other, laying naked in a bed) it goes rapidly downwards...

nothing to get the attention, not a mind-catching thing in the whole plot, baaad baad acting (a few minor exceptions, but artificiality is at its best).

Incest and lesbianism are promising themes, but the script analyses none of the two in depth ( mind that a possible excuse of the makers, saying that they aimed for a subtle movie would be hilarious, unless subtle and superficial mean the same thing...

The too curious viewers will not get any interesting scene...

at this point, that could have saved some of the movie...

so you can imagine how bad it is.

Many other things could be said...

but please watch the movie yourselves...

I am an egoist and I would like as many people as possible to waste about 1 1/2h of their lives...

like I did :(

Yes, indeed, it could have been a good movie.

A love biangle, (sorry for the poetical license, but is not a triangle!) an interesting story, unfortunately badly told.

The image is sometimes weird, sometimes OK, the picture looks crowded and narrow-sighted.

The sound needs more attention (it usually does in Romanian movies), the light and color filters are sometimes badly chosen.

The soundtrack is short and is not helping the action.

About the acting...

sorry but the best actress is the landlady.

The others are acting immaturely and cannot convince the viewer.

The acting is poetical when it should be realistic, and realistic when it should be poetical.

It's a picture for adults, told by the children.

Bother only if extremely curious.

Closer to reality and containing more depth than "Breakdance", Stan Lathan's "Beat Street" is still a pretty dull show.

Again this pic is really only cashing in on the 'breakin' craze but at least we get a little bit of entertainment from the plot, which concerns the lives of three young friends and a younger brother, all growing up in Queens, New York.

Each has their own unique talent.

One is a hustler, one a d.j., another an artist who creates 'burners', while little bro' Lee is a hot 'hip hop' dancer.

Lathan is unable to generate any real audience interest in the story though, and his young cast are likewise struggling with their characters.

Therefore it is left almost entirely to the funky music and the 'fresh' dancing to save the day.

Choreography is again sharp for both club and street scenes, but this alone is not enough to lift ""Beat Street" to greater heights.

Unfortunately the film really falls flat late on, after showing a glimmer of hope that it just might get interesting.

Sunday, August 25, 1996 - Video

Hilariously obvious "drama" about a bunch of high school (I think) kids who enjoy non-stop hip-hop, break dancing, graffiti and trying to become a dj at the Roxy--or something.

To be totally honest I was so bored I forgot!

Even people who love the music agree this movie is terribly acted and--as a drama--failed dismally.

We're supposed to find this kids likable and nice.

I found them bland and boring.

The one that I REALLY hated was Ramon.

He does graffiti on subway trains and this is looked upon as great.

Excuse me?

He's defacing public property that isn't his to begin with.

Also these "great" kids tap into the city's electricity so they can hold a big dance party at an abandoned building.

Uh huh.

So we're supposed to find a bunch of law breakers lovable and fun.

I could forgive all that if the music was good but I can't stand hip hop.

The songs were--at best--mediocre and they were nonstop!

They're ALWAYS playing!

It got to the point that I was fast-forwarding through the many endless music numbers.

(Cut out the music and you haver a 30 minute movie--maybe) There are a few imaginative numbers--the subway dance fight, a truly funny Santa number and the climatic Roxy show.

If you love hip hop here's your movie.

But it you're looking for good drama mixed in--forget it.

Also HOW did this get a PG rating?

There's an incredible amount of swearing in this.

Maybe you shouldn't compare, but Wild Style and Style Wars are original Hip Hop.

Beat Street does have a lot of the original artists of early Hip Hop, but they've been obviously made clear that this could be their big break, of course for some it was and that's nice.

But if you view this as original Hip Hop Culture you're wrong.

It's overproduced and has a Hollywood sauce.

Rather look for the first two movies i mentioned.

They have convey the grittiness that comes with life in the ghetto.

Yes, the rating for this movie is low, but the reviews are mostly positive or even raving.

This is probably because although the story, the acting, the dialogues and the direction all are dreadful, the music and dancing is what the people love about it.

Me, i do love the dancing but at the time thought that electro was the death of Hip Hop (i was so glad when round '86 a new generation of now classic Hip Hop artists appeared, like Krs One, Public Enemy, Ultramagnetic Mc's, Jungle Brothers, Bizmarkie to name a few), and i still don't like most of the beats in this movie and that is why it doesn't work for me.

I mean, Wild Style has not much of a story but the music there is great and authentic.

Of course tastes differ and that's alright.

But as far as i'm concerned, this movie is trash except for the break dancing and some of the music and so i can't rate it higher than a 4 out of ten.

I could never stand watching Happy Days after Chachi joined the cast, so I knew I was in trouble when the best scene in this movie featured Scott Baio (a skateboard chase scene!).

Jodie Foster in her first "grown-up" role turns in her usual professional performance but that is no excuse for this boring mess.

Two hours out of my life that I'll never get back!

No noteworthy characters, unbelievable storyline, questionable editing and horrendous cinematography but worst of all, I couldn't have cared less.

The story of California teens in the 1970's, where the kids live miserable lives and all their parents are idiots.

Don't waste your time watching this ugly excuse for a movie.

Horrible film with bits of the Ramones strewn about.

Your worse than average 1970's/80's comedy format of the cool kids taking over the school with some whimsical plan.

This movie is terrible.

The plot consists of a girl who enjoys the Ramones and a school bent on fighting against their oppressive administration.

Forget this movie and watch something like Wild Zero starring Guitar Wolf if you want an entertaining B movie.

Terrible acting, terrible writing, terrible plot with the stamp of approval of the Ramones who probably needed some money quick so they said yes to this movie.

That is the only logical thing I can think of because this movie blows.

This movie is a 90 minute Ramones concert with brief periods of stupidity and absolute boredom.

What kind of high school is this anyway?

Unless you are a major Ramones fan, DO NOT and I repeat DO NOT waste your time like I did.

This is utterly unwatchable from start to finish.

This movie should be called Ramone Fever.

Everyone appears to like them in this movie.