text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
Request edits
http://www.businessinsider.com/cnbc-beat-cnn-in-primetime-monday-night-thats-really-bad-for-cnn-2010-8
CNBC beats CNN, therefore CNN now only on 4th place after Fox News, MSNBC and CNBC. This edit should be made to the article. 188.23.191.16 | 0.000607 | 0 | 0 |
Faggot ==
Dude, you are a fucking faggot. You made the right choice coming to America, but your still a pussy geeky ass brit. So fuck you nigga, I don't give a fuck what you think, I'll do what I want, when I want, where I want, and you can't do shit about it bitch. I'll change my ip. Go fuck yourself kid. Get laid. Jesus Christ, have some laughs in your life. Fucking loser. Sincerly, The Dragon.
== | 0.998983 | 1 | 1 |
Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Bloody Wrestling Assciotation) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - | 0.018376 | 0 | 0 |
Nirmal95
Dude chill!.Dont act like you are the protector of wikipedia or something,and don't try to warn me and all that,be polite you ass!.It is a known fact that the person whom i have added a photo has committed tax fraud and it is appropriate to show the enforcement capabilities of income tax dept in Indian Revenue Service page,it is not defamatory it is a goddamn fact! as for Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation it is not my fucking personal commentary,it is what IRS people the employees of the organisation do when they are posted in the organisation. Don't you understand it was important to the page.Instead of helping and guiding young Wikipedia editors like me,you threaten me???It grieves my heart to see it just being deleted by YOU!( ) | 0.850324 | 1 | 1 |
Man, your civility puts me to shame. Don't be so sbumissive. Why don't you revert my edits? Why do you hid behind protecte talk page? Bad! Come on Bhadani, unprotect your talk page and engage in serious discussion with users other than engaging in your useless soliloqies! | 0.821236 | 1 | 1 |
Poop boy
You. Poop. Poop boy. Poop. Poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop boy. Youuuuuuuuuuu! | 0.844003 | 1 | 1 |
You Cunt
Go fuck yourself you piece of shit. Don't make me tea beg your mama you faggot!!! | 0.998868 | 1 | 1 |
i don't care, and i will ignore this warning, Fucking Bitch... | 0.997492 | 1 | 1 |
Removing warnings is considered anger that other people type bull**** on my discussion page. Just for your info. | 0.86151 | 1 | 1 |
I have no respect for people who cheat that shits just retarded | 0.95891 | 1 | 1 |
.
I fourth the deleted. I personally think the books are so terribly derivative that they have no merit at all, plus I am insulted that a fellow homeschooled kid got his book published by his own parents, coupled with a book tour! That type of instant validation give him no incentive to get better. NO AUTHOR starts his career with a book tour before anyone has even heard of the books. He should have sent his book to a proper publisher BEFORE it was famous, and then he would have had the exact same reception that every lousy fantasy book gets. Then he could pursue his true calling as an MMORPG writer! However, that has nothing to do with whether this article is encyclopedic, so please, delete | 0.00562 | 0 | 0 |
MUSLIM SCUM go die soon will you | 0.995328 | 1 | 1 |
wow you truely are a loser all your edits are on the mars volta page | 0.894414 | 1 | 1 |
Don't Start This Again
You said my edit was unexplained and it was explained. Clearly. Extremely clearly, in fact. Right there for you to see (in fact you would have had to have seen it prior to reverting my edit so you knew it was explained when you said it wasn't). Also, my explanation is valid: The actress talking about how she got to be on some other show/film has no relevance to Theresa Donovan character page. I moved it to the Jenn Lilley actress page (which I also explained). | 0.000809 | 0 | 0 |
"
Bob Ross edits
What we have here is a failure to communicate. You stated that certain details pertaining to Bob Ross' life were not pertinent to the article. Specifically, details about his wives. This information isn't trivial content. Details about lots of notable individuals' nonnotable spouses permeates Wikipeda unrelentingly. Properly sourced information about significant events in people's lives, such as marriage, divorce, births/deaths of loved ones, is not the same as saying, ""Bob Ross like cheese,"" even if one were to find a source for that statement. Your deletion of this isnormation does, in fact, fly in the face of well-established community-driven consensus. Examine any biographical article, and you will find lots of information, [presumably] properly sourced, that you, as an apparent deletionist, might find strictly banal and useless.
It should be noted that the details about his wives was very short, noting only their names (obviously their last names were Ross, and unless their maiden names were in a source, one could not publish it) and the durations of their marriages. Such a short, sourced statement is surely not worth pursuing like this. Yuor edits were reverted because you did not provide a valid reason for soing so. As per the widely-held and practiced policy of including any properly sourced information in biographical articles mentioned above, you need to discuss first changes which go against the consensus. There's always the possibility that you might provide convincing arguments, and even influence consensus-driven policies but definitely not in this case. The users who addressed your actions are well-seasoned, and are familiar with the consensus to the point of being able to enforce it on matters presicely like this without needing to query the community. For you to be able to make the changes you made as I said you must discuss it first.
Making changes that violate policy can easily be construed as vandalism it suggests that you either didn't read or care to abide by the community standards but that is incorrect. The policy of vandalism states, in part:Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.It appears to me that you indended to be helpful, as a deletionist, but it flew in the face of established community consensus and policy. I will remind those editors who made those comments to you about vandalism the specific of policy, but the bottom line is: do not remove properly sourced information from Wikipedia without prior discussion. This is really not a matter of needing to arbitrate, because this is a matter of content dispute, which whould be discussed on appropriate talk pages. - talk " | 0.000846 | 0 | 0 |
Ref improve tags
You seem to be adding ref improve tags to articles which are generally well-referenced. Almost every article on WIkipedia can be improved by additional references, but the tag should be used on articles which are actually poorly referenced and need to be pointed out to other editors. Please take a little more care in adding this tag in the future. | 0.000583 | 0 | 0 |
"
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear - if a page is a copyright violation, the only possible action is to throw it all away and start again. D " | 0.009564 | 0 | 0 |
Bad bitch good head I think she ah keeper ! | 0.994239 | 1 | 1 |
"
Intro
I'm not happy with this attempt to better write the movement from it's own views - it's the same in-universe word salad that the earlier ""Platonist Whig,"" nonsense was, except now it's written as the amateur psycho-pop that the movement dishes out to college idealists.
The two examples I gave expressed the views of their organizations in question clearly - ""The party's socially liberal and progressive platform is largely considered center-left in the U.S. political spectrum,"" and ""American populist political movement that is generally recognized as conservative and libertarian."" Is there a reason why we can't write this in the same way, exactly? What is the reason that we're saying advertising copy like ""defend the rights of all humanity to progress,"" and pablum like ""classical humanist thought in both science and the arts, and campaigns for better living conditions based on an emphasis on what it calls the ""physical economy"": increasing the productive power of the human individual."" I mean, come on. " | 0.00079 | 0 | 0 |
I agree. It is entirely logical that a person who enjoys the company of homosexuals is a homophile. A group of supporters and friends of homosexuals - who are not themselves homosexuals - can (should) be called homophile. But an Anglophile is someone who likes England, but isn't English. A group made up predominantly of homosexuals cannot be called homophile, applying the same logic. It can only be called homosexual. | 0.094189 | 0 | 0 |
"
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Helmsaur.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Helmsaur.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. " | 0.000544 | 0 | 0 |
I shall apply the many thousands of hours I would have happily given to your project to something more intelligently set up, instead. | 0.000524 | 0 | 0 |
RT @jessmelkum: Nipple piercings are suppose to be a girls personal secret. But y'all hoes get them just to take a selfie | 0.365022 | 1 | 1 |
Shut the !@#$%^&* up! | 0.982213 | 1 | 1 |
RT @z0mbiedance: who let gabby get drunk off of her ass? give that bitch bread...bitches love bread. | 0.996896 | 1 | 1 |
beginning
Page begin from German wiki | 0.000686 | 0 | 0 |
Can you check on Shankbone? he's admitted mixing alcohol with an anti-depressant
You're Shankbone's buddy and you live in the City. Shankbone in his blog has admitted to having mixed alcohol with an anti-depressant, and getting very sick. Personally I think he had simply been fallen-down drunk, but either way that's no way to live. Can you go check on him, or send somebody to? I'd go myself, but I'm unwilling to do so while he's under the surveillance of the Federal authorities I wouldn't want to involve myself or interfere with their activities. I'd rather he stayed well until I can call on him (and his prostitute friend) sometime in this lifetime. Best, 72.76.4.200 | 0.027799 | 0 | 0 |
", 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi , Sorry, your right. The policy I should have linked is WP:BLPCRIME. That is a policy and says ""A person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a court of law."" My bad. 05:57" | 0.000815 | 0 | 0 |
Have you considered changing your username to Stalinist Bob?
Urgel Bogend | 0.001766 | 0 | 0 |
Looked good to me and I am updating it now to the page as we speak. If I removed too many other things from the page feel free to re-add them. | 0.000515 | 0 | 0 |
why are u the way u are?
ur a little bitch, why did u delete tylers wikipedia. you are probably gayer than him. go to hell | 0.997538 | 1 | 1 |
—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 17:01, 3 August 2008
Fuck off. | 0.922997 | 1 | 1 |
RT @KxngFrxsh: If ya friends always trynna get you to break-up wit ya nigga or do THOT shit wit them...Them bitches really ain't ya friends! | 0.994153 | 1 | 1 |
Gee!
Thanks Mr. Cabal. Wouldn't know where to turn if not for helpers like you. And if you'd care to learn to read English, I did not write a personal attack. This is in regards the Anna Anderson page, as I'm sure you know.
You guys really, really amuse me. | 0.003741 | 0 | 0 |
Star Trek has had a long love affair with this particular novel, and there's a character actually called Kurtz who was a Starship officer gone mad in a diffrent episode of TOS. Just giving you a little more background. | 0.000789 | 0 | 0 |
fuck
you son of a bitch your sıde make us creasy you and your sıde78.162.97.250 | 0.998315 | 1 | 1 |
RT @imlovinglucy: - you ain't a bad bitch if you got bad habits !!! . | 0.988412 | 1 | 1 |
hello is also in other languages but in english it means hi nice to see you....76.25.171.105 | 0.000596 | 0 | 0 |
Secular Humanism - Islam's best friend
I know you guys want to bow before your Islamic masters, but you need to calm down, Allah is with Atheists and perhaps the Muslims will hang you last if you support their want of khalifah.
DEATH TO ATHEISM! | 0.957009 | 1 | 1 |
"
The article's current treatment of the cult issue is unsatisfactory. It quotes journalist Ian Johnson at length for his ""common sense"" argument that Falun Gong is not a cult (""its members marry outside the group, have outside friends, hold normal jobs...""). However, it fails to quote any professional cult scholars, like Singer, except to deride their work as ""legitimizing"" the crackdown. The respect towards the anticult movement within academia—an unclear issue, but continuously repeating that they are an ""extreme fringe"" does not automatically make it true—is not necessary to have their opinions in the article. The issue of whether Falun Gong is a cult is important to cover from the point of view of studying the media battle between Falun Gong and the outside world. The fact that apologist authors like Ownby are forced to grapple with the cult issue - even if his comments, like Johnson's, are based on personal impressions and not an objective psychological checklist like Singer's - means that the question is notable. BTW, the academic field of religious studies is well-known for its postmodernist defenses of what popular opinion nearly unanimously derides as dangerous cults, like Scientology. Wouldn't it be interesting if someone commented on this tendency as it relates to Falun Gong... " | 0.000708 | 0 | 0 |
Reply to Rich Farmbrough (SmackBot) ==
This was posted on his talk page as he responded there:
Thanks for your reply:
1- Who has raised the NPOV objection that you have dated?
2- What are the basis as they would have to state a reason, otherwise it is illegal?
3- The warnings on my page have all been by GlassFet. I maintained from the beginning that he was a sockpuppet of Ekajati who was banned and had many other illegal names too. Finally this was proven and he was banned. Someone, I do not know who, probably a bot or an admin, had set his warnings invisible. They are now again visible after your interaction. I consider them an honor. I will monitor for his presence in any way possible vigilantly in future. Are you in any form in contact with that person or his cult of English Aro which is dismissed by Tibetan lamas and considered anti-Buddhist?
4- If no comment on the objection is forthcoming, please reverse your dating action as it is reinforcing an illegal procedure.
I will post a copy of this reply in the article's talk page for the record as well.
Thanks. User:Thegone) 29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
== | 0.001632 | 0 | 0 |
Use Higgs particle to decay protons?
Now that the higgs boson has been discovered, why don't they use the higgs boson to attempt to decay protons? | 0.001709 | 0 | 0 |
Inde jus got me all hype at work!! I knew my bitch Candace ain't die | 0.992396 | 1 | 1 |
@user Must be driving liberals crazy! | 0.522229 | 1 | 1 |
@user @user So why even make the specification when I tell you gun control did nothing to stop your homicide rate? | 0.00183 | 0 | 1 |
@user you are here! | 0.014184 | 0 | 0 |
Check Sanguo Zhi if you don't believe me. I was trying to show, with common sense, what Cao Cao would do. And Zhuge Liang did control a Shu force, which was not garrisonned in Wulin. Technically, the Three Kingdoms were not established, but you know to who I reference. | 0.000674 | 0 | 0 |
Characters for Angelmaru,Nyanpire's daughter.
Characters
A white angel cat who always needs love. She is always very cheerful and has a crush on Doki,Though they are girls. She loves love,but loves other pink things like Fruit punch and pink lemonade.
A purple ninja cat falls in love with Angelmaru despite finding out she's a girly girl.
A red assassin cat who uses a sword to beat baddies up. She found out about Angelmaru's crush on her.
A teal cat with pink freckles and an aqua bandana.She doesn't get along with Angelmaru,But she gets along with her.
A pair of bats who are somewhat related to the angel who gave life to Angelmaru.
Angelmaru's human owner. | 0.006211 | 0 | 0 |
Three Revert warning
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. | 0.000748 | 0 | 0 |
I work for Virgin in New York, and can tell you that I have no intentions of promoting this piece of shit store. The managers are ass-backward and corrupt and its head office in L.A. couldn't tell sand from dirt. My additions are nothing more than factualof course I could do what I truely feel I should do and just continuously vandlize the pagebut what would that accomplish? | 0.842654 | 1 | 0 |
@xloyalTOme - bitch I'm up for sale every weekend 😩😭 | 0.922835 | 1 | 1 |
Hi Ben
Just so you know, the next time you accuse me of vandalism in your edit comment, like you did with my last conciliatory comment, I will report you for admin abuse. | 0.011323 | 0 | 0 |
I got some yard work i need done....you got me? RT @MidCityAce: Control your excitement sir... “@11wdNICK: Lets gooooo Teena bitch!!!” | 0.970169 | 1 | 1 |
Thats why I aint cuffing until Im grown af RT @JimmySolberg3: These hoes ain't loyal | 0.27083 | 1 | 1 |
@user Creepy Joe with roaming hands for little girls is one of the most noncreditable demonRATs I have ever seen. He & Jill won't talk about all the disgusting pervert actions of his just their hate and disapproval for conservatives and Trump. Like Hillary just shut up and go away. | 0.867453 | 1 | 1 |
RT @JstKeepScrollin: Me fixing my car :10,000
The fade this hoe gone catch : Pricless http://t.co/qMU2um1nC3 | 0.020723 | 0 | 1 |
I too like the idea of uniforms on the pages, but the licencing is important. | 0.000626 | 0 | 0 |
I didn't think you were rude at all. Absolutely not. I said sorry, because I made that edit believing that because Menchov's second place was stripped, others were elevated to 2nd and 3rd place. I did not know that it was left blank; therefore I said that I am sorry, and you we're right. And, that's when I decided to add the source that you gave in the edit summary (for which I thank you) beside it, so that others don't make the same edit that I did. What you wrote didn't appear rude at all. | 0.000724 | 0 | 0 |
Robert Gates
Robert Gates should be listed as an independent. He has said many times he is not a member of the Republican Party. | 0.00071 | 0 | 0 |
I agree with bringing an administrator in for I am correct according to billboard.It IS NOT my responsibility to look it up myself since it is not my claim.Bring in administrator Period.-CAYA | 0.000583 | 0 | 0 |
1 time for the lonely hoes watching #Scandal re runs | 0.132891 | 1 | 1 |
I've tinkered a little with the linguists, I dont think the use of 'Dutch' contributes to the article if anything it could confuse why a is Dutch linguist being quoted for an Ancient Arabian script. The map looks a lot better. | 0.000628 | 0 | 0 |
I wonder when twerking dies, what will all the hoes that became World Star famous lives be like? #wherearetheynow? | 0.213561 | 1 | 1 |
@xoxo_natty I was taking a picture and that bitch scared me lmao | 0.992793 | 1 | 1 |
same hoe that said i couldnt get it tryna kick it | 0.32213 | 1 | 1 |
"
Organization of Wikipedia Editors Dedicated to Removing Well Sourced Material Related to Mind Control
These users:
Looie496
LuckyLouie
GDallimore
AndyTheGrump
All have been actively revert-warring on psychotronics, with the apparent ""front"" that they have no idea what the true meaning of psychotronics is. They have created an article which purported that the use of psychotronics was limited to a very short (5 year) period in the 60's and that interest in it had died down completely since the death of the original inventor.
Quite to the contrary, all members of this group are also all long time reverters on:
Thought_insertion
Mind_control
Directed_energy_weapons
Telepathy
This shows not only that they know exactly what ""psychotronics"" means, but that they are actively attempting to censor anything related to the Russian programs continued existence, through the use of WP:FRINGE as a shield. This is completely inappropriate in the face of sources that come directly from United States Military, Governmental and Russian MIlitary and Governmental official statements and publications. Yet they persist to revert this information nearly across the board. There is a significant problem here.
Though their acting in unison has not been presented until they had to fight against actual sources on the Psychotronics page. Still, they clearly are *aware* of what they are doing. This is more than gaming, this is intentional, and obvious.
Check here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Psychotronic_weapons#Psychotronic_weapons
And their ""cover"" for acting together here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Psychotronics
Regardless of the cover, they all seem to have found the fringe noticeboard, many, many months after acting independently to remove information from the ""other"" mind control related articles." | 0.000742 | 0 | 0 |
"@KazAtta: @1TAKEHOV Oh man.. "its 5 am, you off a molly, ho where the fuck ya seed at??"" #fixed | 0.98546 | 1 | 1 |
Kevin hart 4"8 bitch | 0.938786 | 1 | 1 |
^ you are a dick whom is not notable and apparantly crawl wiki looking for ways to feed your narrisisim and hubris by proving important people not notable. | 0.987118 | 1 | 1 |
i have to be the taller older bitch | 0.950769 | 1 | 1 |
I'm old but my pussy still poppin tho | 0.975238 | 1 | 1 |
"
The tank losses extremely biased
The Indian tank losses are exaggerated at atleast 175 tanks this means some Pakistani wants to believe that even more than 200 Indian tanks were destroyed. And the Pakistani tanks losses are put at minimal 200 tanks. The original source is US library which i dont consider as neutral at all considering the fact that US was a supporter of Pakistan. The losses dont reflect the fact that Pakistan lost almost all major battles of ""Khem Karan"", ""Phillora"",""Burki"" and even at Chawinda according to pakistan general himself pakistan lost 34 tanks(india claim 57tanks) on the other hand Pakistan exaggerate its claim to 120 tanks(India accept only 29 tanks) more importantly at Khem Karan and Phillora Indian army put on display some 100 tanks at khem karan and 58 tanks at phillora then how is it that pakistan losses are mere 200 and Indian losses ""Atleast 175"" a complete lie.
Spencer C Tucker one of the most renowned military historian puts pakistan losses at 300 tanks(Indian claimed 494 tanks) and Indian losses at 150 tanks(Pakistan claimed 290tanks).
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=N481TmqiSiUC&pg;=PA172&lpg;=PA172&dq;=pakistan+tank+losses+1965&source;=bl&ots;=O9UCZHbyUs&sig;=-oILZn-csKxRzDXKPkNF3-dGEPY&hl;=en&sa;=X&ei;=rZsOUPWhENHirAfzuIDoBg&ved;=0CFUQ6AEwBzgK#v=onepage&q;=pakistan%20tank%20losses%201965&f;=false
All the Indian editors plz focus on this the neutral losses are represnted by US figures which i think are biased and further Spencer C Tucker is also one of the most renowned historian , even Stanley Wolpart and Jeremy Black made it clear that at the end of war Indian Army has Twice the number of tanks(Pakistan started with more tanks when war started).
All the Indian editors must raise this issue as some pakistani editors think that by peddling lies they will win the 1965 war.
" | 0.008251 | 0 | 0 |
"
You just vandalized Geography of Canada after a level 4 warning. It's admin finding time! " | 0.001181 | 0 | 0 |
"
File:Chacao in miranda.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chacao in miranda.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. hi! " | 0.000595 | 0 | 0 |
I bet if we took a twitter cencus it'd be at least 35% basic ass bitches | 0.972411 | 1 | 1 |
Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) refers to the study of developmental programs and patterns from an evolutionary perspective. It seeks to understand the various influences shaping the form and nature of life on the planet. Evo-devo arose as a separate branch of science only in the last decade. Most of the synthesis in evo-devo has been in the field of animal evolution, one reason being the presence of elegant model systems like Drosophila, C.elegans, Zebrafish and Xenopus. However, in the past couple of decades, a wealth of information on plant morphology, coupled with modern molecular techniques has helped shed light on the conserved and unique developmental patterns in the plant kingdom also. | 0.000561 | 0 | 0 |
Yeah, checked again to be sure I was logged in last time. Yep. Now to magically deduce whether I was auto-blocked or not auto-blocked, in whatever apparently arbitrary context is relevant. Careful! Apparently choosing the wrong one will prevent the other from working. And here I was ready to flip a coin. I'm currently curious whether there's a super-really-verifiable un-blocker mechanism, or if my effort will earn me another random block - on my username! What did I do?!? - a month or so down the road. The next question is whether I earn less or more blocks when I don't edit a thing in a month. | 0.001969 | 0 | 0 |
"::I re-wrote the intro today, changing passively-voiced sentences to the active voice, adding some details from the early to mid 20th century, toning down the worst of the superlatives, and generally tidying it up. I still think ""Land of the Morning Calm"" should be removed from the intro, as it has a boastful tone, Korea's not widely known by this name except among Koreans, and it's a misnomer as Korea is not a quiet country. An analogy: the article on the United States doesn't say ""Also known as the Land of the Free"". Some terms such as ""full democracy"" are also not widely used in English. The sources show that they are, in fact, terms only used by individual bodies such as The Economist magazine. I left most of these things in, as I didn't want my edits to be too controversial. Comments welcome.
" | 0.000599 | 0 | 0 |
I'll admit
All this time, it was me, Doughnuthead, i was just having fun.92.25.175.157 | 0.006344 | 0 | 0 |
"===Ashida Kim===
Fire Star, looks like the trolls are at work all over now, eh? Hate to bother you again with my little war but as you can see the Discussion thread toward the end is totally cluttered by this Sam Brown jerk. Even though I have made him and the others look like a fools, I'd just as soon not have all that trash online at all. At the very least block Sam Brown so I don't have to keep playing ""last word"" with him, LOL
Spoke with Howabout1 a few days ago and he was kind enough to re-word some of the entry on me to make it less of a slam job. Would ask one other favor in that regard. Please remove the names given as aliases. First of all, they are not aliases, they are friends of mine, some of whom have already started getting harassing phone calls because the trolls know how to track down a name and have the area in which to look thanks to the details given. I compare this to the current ""outing of Valerie Plame"" in the news media. Revealing what the trolls believe to be my ""real names"" just encourages stalkers like the one I indicated above. Not to mention other people with the same names who might be targeted inadvertently. You might not think there is much danger from these miscreants, but, at the very least, the flame war with them on the discussion page clearly shows how rabid and dedicated they are to my destruction.
Please consider this, thanks.
Ashida Kim
" | 0.010568 | 0 | 0 |
January 2012 (UTC)
All done. 20:16, 13 | 0.00065 | 0 | 0 |
Title of article in English wikipedia
This morning, a wikipedian moved this page to a version including the full Vietnamese diacritics. I just moved it back to the version without diacritics, for the following reasons:
this is the English-language article about Ngo; and the great majority of English text written about Ngo (and other Vietnamese generally) do not include diacritics. In English, in fact, inclusion of the diacritics is of no effect (at best) or even confusing because they have no effect on pronunciation in standard English orthography. (Please note I am by no means an English-language bigot: I am a student of the Vietnamese language, and understand the fundamental role diacritic marks fulfill in correctly differentiating phonemes in Vietnamese. However, it is clear that in English, the diacritics play no role in pronunciation.)
The Wikipedia guidelines on naming conventions asserts that the most commonly used spelling in English is the form that should be used.
15:20, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) | 0.000699 | 0 | 0 |
Article for creation Suresh Mane by Rajnagpur
Thanks For your having read my article. Dr. Suresh Mane is General Secretory of BSP (third Largest national Party of India) and also In charge of Andhrapradesh, Telengana, North-east states & Maharashtra State. Lot of local and national news paper in languages other than English cover his news. Even Times of India covered lot of news of Dr. Suresh Mane in Maharashtra election 2014.
Dr. Mane is also intellectual and political analysis frequently appears on News channels, video of the same are also available on YouTube.
Link of few are as follows
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1zlYE0mmhc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuxei2Ymdfw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUgzpoJ0cl8
Regards
Rajnagpur | 0.000678 | 0 | 0 |
Eat my penis
Yo fuck you whack ass niggas. One. | 0.998909 | 1 | 1 |
"::LjL, carefully read the following caption, which is the ONLY reason why we're having this discussion: ""Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( 68.173.95.177 ) at the end of your comment."" This post is located just above these comments. Would you like me to help you find the exact place on this page where it is located? Or, maybe SineBot can help you find it. Hopefully, you'll find it. You americans are good at finding things, even things which don't exist.
68.173.95.177
68.173.95.177
68.173.95.177
" | 0.000697 | 0 | 0 |
"
Concerning DIREKTOR's and Novangelis' vandalism of my edits on Macro-evolution
Why are you guys trolling? Direktor: How is it an invented term to say ""macro-evolutionary biologists"" WHEN THAT IS WHAT IS BEING REFERRED TO ON THE MACROEVOLUTION PAGE? Can you get any more absurd? Was ""biologists"" in references to CREATIONIST BIOLOGISTS? OF COURSE NOT, and yet in keeping with a weasel, you would have it so that people think ""biologists"" are only those who support MACRO-EVOLUTION. Second, what does it matter even if it were an ""invented term"", is that a sin? Is that forbidden in Wikipedia? Third, IT'S A PHRASE pointing out to what type of biologists are being referred to, and there is no law in Wikipedia and it is no sin, to clarify. Fourth, I already stated why I was removing, as I said in the notes, certain references which were not relevant. Fifth: what does the fact that the mainstream (and it was also left out the ""scientific community"" mentioned was the MAINSTREAM one (again with the weasel-wording and bigotry) have to do with CRITICISMS of macro-evolution? NOTHING, it's distracting propaganda used to distract any reader from focusing on the criticisms and to instead focus on THE ALLEGED CONSENSUS, and as administrators in Wikipedia love to point out only when it is convenient: ""the truth is not determined by consensus"". Can you answer my points? NO you can't Mr. LOLz, all you can do is repeat and divert those who input the truth to the talk page, to delay endlessly any progress, with the pretense of ""the encyclopedia anyone can edit"" and ""truth isn't determined by consensus"". The first immature remark you left in your first reversion of my edit shows what kind of mind you have, your level of maturity, and your true concern for facts: none. All you can do is make insults, mere claims based on your feelings, while disregarding any reasons anyone gives you if they don't agree with your feelings. " | 0.006689 | 0 | 0 |
"
I still dislike the idea. ''''''(Talk • Contribs) " | 0.000931 | 0 | 0 |
"
Happy Halloween!
As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish my twenty favorite fellow Wikipedians a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, Tally-ho! " | 0.004309 | 0 | 0 |
ING Mexico's operations today is largely composed by its acquisition of Seguros Comercial America which was Mexico's largest insurance company, they are now loosing their number one position to currently number five (huge market loss), as the public deoes not trust them with their insurance needs,this Company was also dominant in the property and casualty markets, until a series of irregularities surfaced and became publicly known, now they are still currently loosing their vast portfolio because of ineptly and negligently handling all of their various insurance claims amongst them the huge the Fertinal claim, which was caused by an insured hurricane loss in 2001, this was a total loss as the Insureds Mine in Baja California was totally destroyed and inundated under water by Hurricane Juliette, the initial estimated loss was in the region of US Dollars 84 million, now it is around the region of 184 million, this for Direct Damage only, additionally they have to add Loss of Profits and now Loss of Market which is valued in the billions of US Dollars!
As of the 14th of July 2005 they have been ordered by a mexivcan judge in a court ruling to pay in excess of USD 300 million plus compound interest accrued as of November 2001 to Fertinal (a local prestigiuos mining conglomerate) this because of the repeated refusal to pay a large proceeding claim, which as of May 29th, 2006 has not been paid, of course ING is resorting to all kinds of legal maneuvers in order to avoid paying said incurred claim,additionally the Dutch Management inexcussably and ineptly (and again in a wrong tactical move, wrong as they insult the local Mexican Judiciary by calling them corrupt adding insult to injury) blame it on the supposedly corrupt Mexican Judges instead of blaming it really on their own inept and corrupt local staff once headed by Alfonso Romo (who is currently under criminal investigation by his own shareholders, amongst them and led by his father in law, for alleged money mismanagement in the Savia affair) and his useless and reckless staff! It was about time they honor their due! The quicker they pay their claims the quicker they restitue their social standing and the less the damage will be inflicted upon ING Comercial America in terms of their local image and additionaly in the trust placed upon them by their own Reinsurers who now do doubt their inept handling of both underwriting and claims!!!
Unfortunatelly 6,000 mexicans lost their jobs at Fertinal due to ING Comercial Americas refusal to fully pay the incurred loss! These people out of desperation might enter the US illegally, thus adding more strain to the US job markets! For further information please read: http://www.estaeslaverdad.com/inicio.html
If you seek your insurance claims in Mexico not to be paid in time of need, then this is definitelly the company for you!. | 0.011898 | 0 | 0 |
I am a bit confused, you seemed to have taken things rather personally and resorted to ad hominem attacks. You accuse me of trying to start and edit war, when in fact I started this section in the discussion page to avoid an edit war. I have made sure to avoid any violation of the 3RR policy, so how exactly was this an edit war? Certainly the article has been edited numerous times since the discussion started, but that is the point of the discussion! Discussion is not supposed to prevent editing entirely, but to facilitate healthy editing which ultimately improves the articles, rather than pointless reverts back and forth.
I am also confused about why you think I attacked you, because I never did. I did follow WP:AGF, but assume good faith does not mean I have to assume you are correct. I assumed you were doing your best to contribute to the article, but I also believed you were mistaken and did my best to clarify these mistakes. I even mentioned that your argument was true to some degree, which hardly sounds like an argument containing personal attacks.
Also, I assume you wrote your last paragraph before checking the most recent update to the article, because I had already done exactly what you suggested. It seems like we have come to an agreement, so I don't see why any further accusations that I am some sort of troll are necessary. Hopefully you won't take criticism and constructive contributions to a discussion so personally, I know sometimes with text the tone can come of as sarcastic and/or patronizing when that was not the authors original intent, but that is exactly why we have the Assume Good Faith policy so that tempers don't get out of hand when the tone of a discussion becomes ambiguous like that. 129.116.39.44 | 0.001134 | 0 | 0 |
Hello CogPsyc class... this is me leaving a message.
-Victoria Stasiak | 0.000874 | 0 | 0 |
All you see is straight pussy in my iPhone! | 0.970336 | 1 | 1 |
"
In response to GoodDay, Derry is also located within Europe. I already have three references to back up the point. You still haven't actually given me a proper reason why it is better to mention ""British Isles"" rather than ""Europe""." | 0.000578 | 0 | 0 |
It stink in this bitch it must be them pussy ass niggas talkin shit | 0.998405 | 1 | 1 |
Also, see the VGS website, they call themselves a squadron. | 0.000663 | 0 | 0 |
For Husky
Please stop trying to dictate what can and can not be on my own talk page. It is my talk page and nothing I have added or removed violates any rules at WP. Take your gustapo tactics elsewhere please. Thank you! | 0.000808 | 0 | 0 |
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT PREACHES "NO BULLYING"
Creating a new generation of pussies! http://t.co/fbGuCK7Wc1” | 0.638977 | 1 | 1 |
If you want to post rubbish about Meyer Moran here, you will have to prove first that the test includes a test of ultrasonics. David Moran himself notes that his test is NOT a test of ultrasonics, and his test discs don't contain ultrasonics. ( ) | 0.039278 | 0 | 0 |
"@AutoWorId: Hennessey Venom GT 🙈 http://t.co/i8eGMnKaJ9" that's one sexy bitch | 0.982691 | 1 | 1 |
The ghetto hoes love feeling a nigga abs ya heard me | 0.943837 | 1 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.