text
stringlengths
7
5k
degree_of_toxicity
float64
0
1
contains_offensive_word
int64
0
1
label
int64
0
1
" This is actually false; North Africa has historically always been populated by Caucasians, not blacks. The ""Land of the Blacks"" refers to sub-Saharan Africa, not Northern Africa. Even your mixed race argument doesn't hold up because the Northern Africans appear Arab or European, not mixed race. Thanks for playing. 66.91.245.60 "
0.00818
0
0
YOU A**HOE! HEY STOP FKING YOUR MOTHR! GET A LIFE OF YOUR OWN AND START MINDING YOUR OWN BUSSINESS INSTEAD OF UNDOING OTHERS EDITS, YOU DO NOT OWN WIKIPEDIA, TRY TO KEEP WIKIPEDIA ALIVE, THERE ARE SO MANY ARTICLES WHICH ARE NOT BACKED BY SUPPORTING INFORMATION, THAT WAS HOW WIKIPEDIA FIRST CAME TO LIFE, EVERYONE WROTE WHAT THEY KNEW. STOP MORAL POLICING. GO GET A LIFE IN REAL WORLD, FIND A JOB EARN SOME MONEY, MARRY AND MAKE A LIFE INSTEAD OF SPENDING ALL TIME ON WIKIPDA. YOU ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING TO WIKIPDA by GUESSING OTHERS EDITS TO BE BAD/WRONG YOU A_HOLE. MOTHR FCUKR COME EAT MY SHT.
0.979669
1
1
I feel both qualify.
0.000637
0
0
@1D_NIPPLES_ bitch you fucking told me to sit in that seat and yo dumbass come again saying "why you sitting there" bitch #vote5sos
0.998495
1
1
Hey Joanne are ur female ay.. how old r u??
0.682038
1
0
" As this article is essentially a reconstruction of his resume, WP:RESUME would appear relevant. Per WP:NOR#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, articles are meant to ""be based on reliable, published secondary sources"" in order to provide ""interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims"" about the topic. Lack of any such interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims, is why I described the article as a ""bland and bloodless resume"" not WP:IDONTLIKEIT (as you claimed in violation of WP:AGF). If the only thing distinguishing him from my ""any random Biblical scholar"" is the adjective ""distinguished"", then we can simply make this article a soft-redirect, with the following text ""Distinguished Biblical scholar"". I answered your question citing relevant material from the guideline you based your question on. All that ""stands"" is your WP:IDIDNOTHEARTHAT. ''TalkStalk''(P) ''TalkStalk''(P) "
0.000603
0
0
" Deleting ""Future World Music"" Article Hi, Sorry to disturb, It's just I'm not fimiliar with all the precedures of writnig an article Now, I opened Future world music official website and found some information about the movies they made songs for So, I just typed thier names in this article Then, I found some info about Future World Music in the same site so, yes, I admit, I copied it but it was a couple of sentences only!! At last, I havent finished the article yet, and was planning to continue to inhance it and adding the references ""The official site"" So, please, what's wrong?? And, how to avoid that again for this exact article?? What should I do to make it accepted?? Thanks And Sorry Again Best Regards, A.Rami (Beretta)"
0.0012
0
0
flows for the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway.]]
0.000585
0
0
Jazz jumbo dick corporations. Making bitches tap out since 1999
0.977383
1
1
@woohdakidd_74 lol mane shut dat bitch shit up youn fucc wit me
0.998339
1
1
Midnight oil once had a line the beds are burning - methinks part of this house has a bad smell, tyres? Suro
0.005412
0
0
bitches http://t.co/NNg2e1Wmx9
0.985068
1
1
RT @BreadTruckkBri: Denzy a hoe 😂😂😂
0.005145
0
1
shut the fuck up u big dumb bitch ass pussy. i fucked yo wife nigga, done.
0.998914
1
1
gotta clear ya throat of all that pussy eh... RT @johnlacarbiere: My voice is the deepest in the morning
0.972231
1
1
@user this is fucking hilarious
0.987874
1
1
REDIRECT Talk:Happy Hour (comic strip)
0.000696
0
0
RT @ChiefKeef: Finna fly me a Thot out here! Get back on My make bitches Fly like Peter Pan shit.
0.99485
1
1
And it's always the black bitches that's constantly late AF for no reason. Couldn't refuse the ladies in free til 12 & $1 shots
0.823719
1
1
RT @NotoriousJB_: “@Von_VonRichter: Sometimes females are just fucking retarded bro. I swear I just want to kick y'all in the ovaries.”
0.996673
1
1
Oh god, why don't you just fuck of and die of GAIDS? -
0.996301
1
1
" Although Alexa Brown meets the minimum requirements for a separate article, I believe that WP:N's lead is relevant here: ""Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article"" is highly relevant. Creating separate pages for these tightly related subjects both causes editorial hassles (trying to keep the two pages in sync and needing to decide whether a piece of information belongs on one page or the other) and reduces the likelihood that a reader will get the whole story (because most people will only read one of them). Also, keeping it all here may reduce the temptation to use the biography for (self-)promotion of the politically active parents and/or their organization. IMO merging/not splitting is the better answer. "
0.000586
0
0
. So if anybody can find a printed magazine source, or otherwise third-party source for this, definitely contribute
0.000552
0
0
Again Koppel isn't a source. He's a vector for a source. He has to cite someone's stats since journalists don't create their own out of whole cloth. What are they? You can't identify a source only who a journalist is. I'm a journalist. I cite sources other than myself when reporting. You'e not grasping the concept here. There is arbitration.
0.0011
0
0
" Unlucky 13th; it just had to be that game for your run to end. (talk) "
0.001115
0
0
"Thank you for experimenting with the page Louis Braille on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do. →zToth "
0.000525
0
0
Adam4267 again No Drmias I'm not dumb. I'm just not a pussy and I won't be bullied by anyone. Cheers for the spelling tips, I'll keep those in mind for next time I'm updating my Facebook page. And I will stay away from your page - after this. I wouldn't want to embarass you in front of all your pals now would I?
0.592985
1
1
Thanks, Ratagonia. I appreciate that.
0.000613
0
0
You seem to have sand in your vagina. Might want to wash that stinking hole out, bitch.
0.998102
1
1
The Council of Fifty is only one part of a three legged theory of world government - as conceived and contemplated by the original creators of the doctrine. A 'SIMPLE REDIRECT' to the Council of Fifty (or theodemocracy), is similar to describing the whole of the 'American form of government' - as made up from only a legislative body alone. It also shows a lack of understanding to the dogma. To provide a wholistic view - to an encylopedic researcher - the topic suggested by the title and content of this page, more adequately describes the doctrine of world government as developed in early Mormon theology
0.000641
0
0
August 25 Thank you for experimenting with the page Julie Banderas on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
0.000518
0
0
My nigga mister meaner just hope back on the bitch
0.996016
1
1
Marcus is in this hoe schleeeeeeeeeeppppppp
0.495502
1
1
I can see that we will need to hitr people to keep our listing accurate... 216.167.133.217
0.004015
0
0
@BarackObama @MichelleObama omfg you elitist bitch no one cares what you think! go fuck yourselves are you in china anyway?
0.998581
1
1
" There are 10 things wrong with the BCCA page, it really needs to go. Probably ({cn}} would be best in the ""naked spots"" to attract more eyes to the V RS problem, to verifiably describe the ""mainstream"" this time (I am not going to start stuffing the text). This seems most consistent with policy. As for vitamin K1 (plants), the rare reaction cases at very high doses are suspected to be hypersentivity to some injected component(s) PDR, Goodman & Gillman's of the formulations e.g. propylene glycol, (oxidized?) vegetable oils, micellar emulsions and emulsifiers (ummm), polysorbates, etc. "
0.000605
0
0
Fair enough. The standards have change through the years for what people think constitutes worthwhile for days of the year article, but that doesn't mean it has to stay that way or that it will stay that way. Having a new person involved can sometimes serve as a catalyst - or a new creative force. There's not harm in being bold if your intentions are good. Anyway, keep up the good work,
0.000555
0
0
RT @RedTvvitter: "Does my Mewtwo make your pussy wet?" http://t.co/W4zzHr6Kum
0.959461
1
1
penis YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61
0.994852
1
1
Forreal forreal, I would let the founder of Capcom fuck my bitch. They made Street Fighter AND Marvel vs Capcom #EternallyGrateful
0.996096
1
1
, or perhaps use https://secure.reservexl.net/wwwimg/img/tours/593-4.jpg in its place
0.000621
0
0
Irie is a bitch for not letting me borrow his charger.
0.986587
1
1
" *********BABY EATERS???********* Alright is it true that some of the band's songs translate into lyrics like ""I'm going to cut open your fetus, and eat your baby"" ? Or other horrific lyrics?"
0.921391
1
1
Leaving certificate it says this on the website are you blind? Irish Leaving Certificate The points required for entry in 2007 are likely to be similar to those required in 2006 (570 points). Six Year Programme - A minimum of six subjects in the Leaving Certificate Examination, which must include Irish, English, Mathematics, a third language * (*NUI Matriculation requirements) and a science subject from the group Physics, Chemistry, Physics/Chemistry, or Biology. Five Year Programme - Students may be eligible for entry to the five year programme with two sciences. Applicants must obtain a minimum of six subjects, which must include Irish, English, Mathematics, a second language and a minimum of grade B in higher level Chemistry and Physics or Biology.
0.049995
0
0
Hi. KRS tells me that you may be knowledgeable about Indian political parties - The List of political parties in India is a mess! I'd appreciate any help in trying to sort it out. Thanks for your help. 15:20, Dec 19, 2003 (UTC)
0.000536
0
0
" Reply Dear you are right in your argument. The User Walkie-talkie is coming out with some crasy arguments that there is nothing even to discuss about the ""Terrorist category"". I don’t know whether he is thinking Wikipedia should be monopolized by the fascist Sri Lankan killers who are some or other way marginalizing the Tamils in Sri Lanka since the independence. He is talking about commonsense. I don’t think so even he has an iota of that. If Anton Balasingham could be named as the chief strategist and the chief negotiator or the apologist of one of the most barbaric terrorist groups, what about the following atrocities against Sri Lankan Tamils since the independence by the Sri Lankan State. Genocide '83 TABDisappearances & Extra Judicial Killings TABRape & Murder of Eelam Tamil Women TABTorture of Eelam Tamils TABWar Crimes: Sri Lanka - the Record Speaks.... Media & the Tamil Struggle Selective Reporting, Disinformation & Murder of Journalists TABSRI LANKA ACCUSED AT UNITED NATIONS State Terrorism in Sri Lanka If you go through the above incidents you will come to know they are many times worse than the highest number of suicide attacks which were targeted against innocent civilians by the LTTE. I couldn’t understand what is the importance of that banning in 20 countries when hardly most of the countries civilians had not been killed by the LTTE attacks and the LTTE's activities are expanded into those countries only to the extent of fund raising from the expatriate Tamils. He was the political adviser not the adviser to LTTE leader to carry out suicide attacks or to scheme military activities. Composing the LTTE leader's annual speech or representing LTTE doesn’t qualify him for the ""Terrorist Tag"" at all. Why the talks failed every time was mainly the hardliners in the South and not by any of the Tamil groups or LTTE. It is so stupid expecting he definitely knows all the crimes being carried out by the LTTE when he was utilised by the LTTE only at theoretical level and for negotiations. I don’t know why that particular wikipedian feels sorry for him. For what? Here anyone can comment independently and dragging a wikipedian to discuss with some other wikipedians is not acceptable. Then he can come out with his opinions here. Others are also expert in the Sri Lankan Conflict here. "
0.01428
0
0
Or someone to tell Tocino that he's a huge douche. Please don't break revert policy, my edit does not constitute vandalism. Tocino is a tool and a self-righteous prick - that much is obvious by his posts here. Stop defending idiocy, Grsz. 70.95.69.64
0.758608
1
1
@JBilinovich @JZolly23 @cmnw86 You guys wanna skull Fuck some clay birds this weeknd???
0.99728
1
1
WT:Template messages/Redirect pages#Updated, documented updates
0.000675
0
0
RT @ItsJordyyyn: The reason high school is so fucking hard is because ned never made a guide for anything past 8th grade. You feel me? Fuck…
0.991919
1
1
Some quick googling turned up http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/research/pdf_res_notes/rn01-46.pdf, apparently a background briefing for the Scottish Parliament, which says in part: Rape is a gender-specific crime. In Scotland, it can only be committed by males upon females, which appears to mean by persons biologically male at birth upon persons born biologically female. It is, therefore, a crime of specific personal violence perpetrated on females. [...] The act of rape must consist of penetration of the victim's vagina by the accused's penis. Rather unbelievably, it appears from other googling that Scotland does not even have a written-down criminal code, so it is difficulut to settle this question with sources as authoritative as would be possible in the rest of the world. (By the way, where is the link from the main article to laws about rape?) –
0.050123
0
0
My Moor friends,no not black friends,but Moor friends said Nigger came from Nigeria...You are so lost..Stop tagging me...
0.961329
1
1
Thanks for you help as I am still learning (as evidenced by my punctuation and talkpage signing errors just now) but yeah, sometimes the abbreviations and titles etc. and even body counts sadly get all mixed up in the media reports
0.000572
0
0
" pm, Yesterday (UTC−5) | decline = You should not edit war talk to me 15:18"
0.000887
0
0
new york i got 100 guns a hundred clips nigga, i'm from new york new york ja rule ft. fat joe and jadakiss - new york
0.554205
1
1
. Remember, this is just a place for the swapping of opinions, any decision to block a username is yours and yours alone
0.001477
0
0
May 2012 (UTC) He took a leave of absence from Bain in November 1993 (I've just added a source with the date) and returned to Bain the day after the election in November 1994. He also had an option of returning to Bain after the SLC Olympics were over in 2002, but by then he had decided to retry electoral politics. I chose not to include this option in the article, on the grounds it was too much detail that didn't end up mattering. 00:50, 17
0.000586
0
0
lil bitch
0.992257
1
1
If a nigga phone broke best believe he only gon memorize his main bitch number or the bitch that's cash in him out number 💯😏
0.985933
1
1
" I believe that free speech and lack of respect for privacy are different issues completely, and one cannot be used to lay into the other. As far as I am aware, the general consensus across many sites is that if you plaster your personal information all over the internet then you have little recourse when it is plastered somewhere you do not like. It is then logical that whoever holds the domain would choose not to release that information as a common sense measure. I think that the idea that ED simply wishes to ""publish all trackable personal data of victims to defame them"" is a misunderstanding at best and a blatant lie at worst, and the point it (poorly) attempts to make is not worthy of mention in the article. "
0.000972
0
0
Oh dear, Melania strutting her political thang with fact Contradict her husband and that she should just stay in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant like Trump wishes we all could return to. The wife should be seen but not heard. Just like in the 50s
0.086225
0
1
" Earlier today Justin Bieber twatted ""everybody enjoy their new years and have fun. 2010 only ends once. )"". Would you also care to add that to his wikipedia page, along with all 6538 of his other ""press releases""? Dude, it was never that funny, and its over now. Let it go. "
0.025561
0
0
" No Ezhiki. He counted very well. And speaking about his fine contributor and high-quality edits....So much to speak about them....I know he hates Poland and me also but...""This piece of trash"" ??? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Izehar&diff;=next&oldid;=33244436 ??? Look who's talking about! Good joke, ! What about you ? They didn't start the RfC against you for nothing I suppose!? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Ghirlandajo ???? Just look at his contributions: Calling names, ad hominem attacks and usage of offensive language Calling Poles Polacks When asked to apologize or stay on topic, he replied with Offensive language , ""zombie"", revert zombie, , Suggestions of being intoxicated by obscure Polish hack writers, ignorance, ad hominem arguments, calling the arguments of the opponents slurs and hysteria, offensive language, ethnic slurs... all is there, in one edit diff. Also, bizarre accusations of some sort of conspiracy if this statement is a personal opinion of Halibutt, Molobo, Rydel, and Co, you may continue gaping at your cheap Polish propaganda booklets about alleged Russian massacres, which I daresay are ""not considered a credible source even by Wikipedia"" as well ad hominem attack , later even strengthened; rvv a revert maniac: can't we block him?, , racist ethnic generalizations and accuasion of incivility on behalf of the entire Polish nation Trying to escalate the conflict at Talk:History of Belarus by posting this comment at Portal:Russia/New article announcements. The notice was finally removed after Wojsyl asked him to stay cool Accusations of: ...breaking the wiki rules: (though later removed ) ...paranoia ...bad faith: , , , , , , ...ignorance: , , ""fantasies"", rm Polish idiosyncrasies, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chernihiv&diff;=prev
0.121896
1
0
RT @_SadisticBitch: I'll never understand how people can fake an entire relationship? I can't even fake a 'hello' to a bitch that I fucking…
0.994543
1
1
REDIRECT Talk:Danish national cycle routes
0.000606
0
0
" MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? HAND.faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? moronMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotjiggabooMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotkikeniggerMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? jewfaggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? HAND.faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? moronMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotjiggabooMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotkikeniggerMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? jewfaggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? HAND.faggotMONGO, tell us.
0.691051
1
1
" Random Do we need to conform to the Low/High rating or can we change the Random Chance to ""entire"" or ""complete"", since Candy Land is all luck (minus cheating, of course)"
0.000854
0
0
" By the way, I could have sworn I recognized your name from some place, and then I realized that you were at Rational Wiki. I posted there a bit ago about my experience at Conservapedia ~ (talk) "
0.000642
0
0
My dick wants some pussy
0.989954
1
1
This psychopath echomyron needs to be banned from editing. No wonder wikipedia is laughed at by most of the world when you have this psychopath attempting to be a cyber bully. He can't be a real bully because he is a coward. He needs a keyboard to be a tough guy because his life is so pathetic.
0.933176
1
1
@mckinley719 I mean we have other pics of me ..idk why you chose that one *cough* bitch *cough*
0.920112
1
1
Where the bad bitches? Huh? Where ya hiding? *Kanye voice*
0.92531
1
1
What gives you the right to control/edit Wikipedia? Qualifications? Or are you a self-appointed, sad individual who cannot 'make-it' in the real world and feels that you must be the 'big guy' on the internet? You are the epitome of what is wrong with Wikipedia. The fact that this comment has been undone and you made threats to 'ban' its author rather proves the point: no comment can be made against the Wikipedia 'Nazis.' If you remove this comment then you are proving my point. Just comment on it and say I am wrong, rather than the sinister and clearly controlling approach you take. Retain my views and comment upon them here rather than be controlling. I may be wrong but as it stands you conform to the stereotype of the sexless, right-wing, American madmen who control Wikipedia. What kick do you get out of your control - is it sexual or poiitical? You have proved me right by deleting my commments. The very name (Vandalosm Destroyer) says it all. Agressive, vigilante etc.etc.
0.222802
1
0
d hi i am new to wikipedia and im just wondering what was so bad about my edit on red hot chili peppers?
0.000754
0
0
narc Please quit fucking up my edits on Steak Diane. Thank you. 72.33.93.156
0.9885
1
1
Not to call you a bitch ... But they gone hate on my bitches
0.99431
1
1
@user No, you are the most hysterical woman alive. Go find an island and stay there.
0.799804
1
1
I thought it was [], with [] being a diphthong. |talk|contribs|email
0.000699
0
0
How is it disruptive? How else should I write it? I added links to prove my accusations, what more could I do? Where exactly do you see personal attacks in the linked comment? Those two accounts have been revert warring over the template for months, certainly it's not a personal attack to call that behavior disruptive? Also I was invited to the discussion, so why I'm blocked for stating my opinion?90.179.235.249
0.000801
0
0
Can I Just Be Terminated. This Is Bullshit.
0.973015
1
1
Declaration of slavery It's funny, lighten up esay, why don't you eat a taco or something hombre then you can ride your little donkey pablito into town to see how the civil war in your shithole backwards asshole of a nation is going:)
0.927748
1
1
Here we go this fat bitch started talking and now will never stop
0.993117
1
1
Still havent grown up I see. You are so pathetic...u werent quick enough as it got mirrored on another site.
0.927323
1
1
Not WP:LEAD Per the content of the lead, which mentions that Rolling Stone ranked four Beatles albums among the ten greatest of all time. The Rolling Stone ranking for each of those four has been included in the article. On reflection, I think it's reasonable to stop there, rather than give the RS ranking for every single Beatles album.
0.000608
0
0
Roman Polanski You need to accept the fact that he has never been convicted of rape. If you continue on the course you are taking whether it is calling him a rapist on his page or on the talk page you will end up being blocked. I don't want that to happen but you need to learn when to back away from an argument and in this case that is now. '''''' talk
0.017139
0
0
" And those sources are not sufficiently reliable for an accusation that amounts to ""Eichenwald is a pedophile."" "
0.772294
1
1
RT @SheswantstheD: these hoes ain't loyal http://t.co/6xRobDfZtk
0.240585
1
1
Hey Listen dude, you need to stop being a little bitch about everything. You whine and whine and whine until the admins decide that they'll shut you up, by shoving a pacifier in your mouth in the form of whatever your 13-year old ass desires. Tell you what, go suck your mother's titties; you'll be farther then I am, but in a less than dignified way. Some people get off of incest; I wish you the best of luck with that. Sincerely yours, David P.S. Suck my fucking dick, you dumb bastard.
0.998155
1
1
(sorry, this is Yeti Hunter by the way - editing from Uni and forgot to log in)192.43.227.18
0.000981
0
0
Goodnight pretty bitches n real niggas fuck da rest
0.997605
1
1
The bitch coach said she didn't like my attitude.
0.982961
1
1
" Thanks, but no need for that (yet -)). Before Torchiest wrote his script the table was done manually, so it's not the end of the world if we have to do it that way but let's give him and Jonesey a few more days. Thanks for the quick reply and all the best from pen-paper-and-calculator (if not abacus) Luddite apolis "
0.000681
0
0
"see previous talk at /Archive 17 History of Coal Mining A long time ago you helped develop this article, Russia, South Africa and India are notably absent from the article, despite seemingly being major contributors. I also added a short note about Ireland. It would be appreciated, if you could find some experienced contributors to help to write sections on the regions concerned. thanks for the good suggestions. I revised and expanded the article. and Westbrook Pegler I noticed your reversion of 's edits to the Westbrook Pegler article. He has also made questionable edits to the William S. Burroughs article in which it is clear that he finds Burroughs' political views, or rather the views he implies Burroughs held, to be objectionable. It seems that Betempte cannot make edits without adding his opinion about the subject. This is something that may need to be watched. Cheers! -The '45 United States edit Following a discussion at talk, my recent collaborative edit with Dancing Philosopher and Golbez copyedits the third United States intro paragraph with the lead transition sentences, A ""second war of independence"" in the War of 1812 secured U.S. territorial claims against the British Empire and guaranteed Canadian integrity. The United States then embarked on a vigorous program of expansion across North America throughout the 19th century. ... Could you give it a look-see relative to your background in the War of 1812? looks ok to me. ) Strange edit Can you explain this edit? It seems to me to replace perfectly good punctuation with strange punctuation that makes nonsense of the sentence. Have I misunderstood? I don't understand the edit summary comment about ""reject[ing] the Wikipedia ethos"", but whatever you think of an editor, that does not justify reverting a perfectly constructive edit. I have no problem with the commasbut the previous ""edit summary"" was obscene and disgusting and degrading to Wikipedia and could not be allowed to stand. I agree that the edit summary was unhelpful (though ""obscene and disgusting and degrading"" seems somewhat of an overstatement). However, to revert a good edit because you don't like the accompanying edit summary makes no sense, and besides, the edit summary still does stand, as reverting the edit does not remove the edit summary. the statement I consider obscene, disgusting and degrading was ""who wrote this originally? an illiterate american(did I just repeat myself), or a fucking 2 year old?)"". That bespeaks an editor who does not respect the Wikipedia ethosand a ""comma fanatic"" willing to make such outrageous statements over a trivial comma issue. The comma in question does seem to have affected the meaning of the sentence—it is not the sort of ""take it or leave it"" comma which only a comma fanatic would insist on. We may therefore be dealing with some sort of all-purpose grammar fanatic, who threatens myriad rude improvements. Only time will tell. OK, Rjensen, thanks for pointing that out. I had assumed that you were referring to the edit summary in the edit that you reverted in the edit I linked to. I agree that the anonymous user has been completely out of order in his/her ridiculous attacks on everyone he/she disagrees with, and I agree completely with your assessment of the edit summary you have qu
0.001115
0
0
No not really, I picked the name to wind up the PIRA supporting scumbags who frequent Wiki. It's been fun Kingoomieiii. You really should stick to kiddie-fiddling in future, as you seem the sort. You fucking plumb
0.991931
1
1
That bitch is hella cranky today. Someone hand her a joint.
0.995748
1
1
@Italian_Montana @CarterBoy_leake ant is a pussy man, don't make me pull up the pic!!!!
0.97292
1
1
I Hate You And I hope you die in a fire. 128.61.128.159
0.950357
1
1
How is it pointless? Its engaging a social conversation. I think you have given me another warning, and it is completely unwarranted. You may interpret what I say as being a personal attact, but you cant know for sure. You didnt tell me I wasnt allowed to have a conversation with you about my favourite movies, but if you feel that strongly about it then I wont. And yet, without any irrefutable or even substancial evidence I think you have given me another warning. I have the right to be innocent until proven guilty, i should think. Also, do you have a job, you seem to always be here.
0.001319
0
0
"::::Here you go again with your condescension. I know what it means. Are you really this out of touch or are you playing a game? It is called a fool's errand for a reason. Do you seriously not understand this? Do you seriously not understand why that is an insult? Again, you have failed to do your job and simply tell Tribal why what she's doing in inappropriate. Instead, you've mistakenly turned this into a behavior issue by lying about me making ""threats"" and being a ""bully"". I've done no such things. I explained to Tribal that if she continued putting non-encylopedic, poorly sourced (or unsourced) content into hundreds of articles, it would be reported and she could get blocked. THAT is not making threats or being a bully, in the context you are trying to have others believe. Not even close. If anything, the bully is use for threatening me with bans, when I am trying hard to improve this project by stopping what I'm confident is very inappropriate editing by Tribal (because of the huge number of articles it affects). Yet all you want to focus on is these completely out-of-context behavior claims against me, instead of using your admin knowledge for an important and useful purpose - to educate Tribal on why what she is doing is wrong. Non-encylopedic content, no sourcing or unreliable sourcing, and adding content to leads that are very clearly not lead-worthy. You see what's happening and you are choosing to ignore it instead of saying directly to Tribal what the problems are with what she's doing. 76.189.121.57 "
0.008198
0
0
This is overwith and I reverted the offending comment. , Monday March 6 2006 at 05:36
0.00074
0
0