text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
Plot Hole
STOP MESSING AROUND WITH THE PLOT HOLE PART!!! IT DESERVES TO BE THERE!!! SO STOP ERASING IT!!!Tim, 6 January, 2006 | 0.013095 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks!
Thank you so much for your helpful review of Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell - it is nice to know that someone else has struggled with the same sourcing issues! | 0.000596 | 0 | 0 |
@CarelessOne92 he a real nigga tho, that bitch know her place | 0.994423 | 1 | 1 |
Teairri Marie is crazy..The poor girl ain't do anything to her..bitter ass bird | 0.960937 | 1 | 1 |
bitches dumb | 0.995281 | 1 | 1 |
Your are a filthy fuck
go fuck your self | 0.997842 | 1 | 1 |
FUCK YOU !
FUCK YOU ! BITCH, ILL SHOW UR GAME GUIDE. | 0.998105 | 1 | 1 |
Just one parting thought. I'm really not so sure that the troublesome Michaelbeckham should enjoy the privelege of a write protected user page. In the light of his behaviour, I can fully understand the susceptability of his user page to vandalism. By retaining the write protection attribute on his user page you give him both tacit and functional approval to behave in the malevolent manner that he has demonstrated. I think this incident has shown just cause for that configuration choice to be reviewed. | 0.000903 | 0 | 0 |
Good suggestions where the information might go, and good reasons why they might not be ideal. I guess these seems to me like the perfect example where an external link would be the best solution if this information existed on an independent website somewhere. Does anyone think this deserves its own article? That seems like a stretch. | 0.000531 | 0 | 0 |
I feel the page should not be deleted as you guys shouldn't have the fucking rights, to delete my shit. FUCK OFF! | 0.997096 | 1 | 1 |
Possibly unfree File:Maiden tower baku.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Maiden tower baku.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. | 0.000521 | 0 | 0 |
I am not your side bitch no more. | 0.983714 | 1 | 1 |
Your website
After looking at the HTML source for http://www.philippwesche.org/2004/profile.html I conclude that my inability to view your website with high Internet explorer security settings is due to something your ISP is doing before my browser really gets to your actual web page. I only have trouble when I put http://www.philippwesche.org in the address bar. If I put http://www.philippwesche.org/2004/profile.html in the address bar everyting is fine.
Best wishes. | 0.000643 | 0 | 0 |
Just wondering...
How is it possible we have an article on this, but not on René Froger? See nl:René Froger. | 0.000605 | 0 | 0 |
What's with Hezbolah, Mahmood Abbas, and Ismael Haniyeh? | 0.00082 | 0 | 0 |
RT @The_Race_Draft: Obama ain't playin with these hoes... http://t.co/b6Opj6D25y | 0.290579 | 1 | 1 |
"
It is infact you that has edited another users comments i will provide the links for the benifit of everyone.
here
here
here
You have been warned about this. Pro " | 0.004663 | 0 | 0 |
So how about the ones I suggested in the Talk Page? I really think that images like the one of Shego using her powers and at least one of her figthing Kim should be there. | 0.000955 | 0 | 0 |
nigga relax lmao“@SouthsideVic: I cheat on my girl with regular bitches so this a no brainer. RT “"@artillery909: http://t.co/VNmdSAT7gS"”"” | 0.967044 | 1 | 1 |
Yes agreed. And it's been removed. It truly had no place in the article. Those were the opinions of one person alone. The show was highly regarded throughout Europe. A look at the comments at Amazon and YouTube prove this. You might as well call Baywatch 'terrible' - or for that matter all the typical tripe emanating from the US television market. The author clearly suffered from a case of NPOV. | 0.000592 | 0 | 0 |
Dunno who the fuck you are, but evidently you completely misunderstood the situation. Don't post messages if you haven't got a fucking clue what's going on. 200.120.210.115 | 0.995498 | 1 | 1 |
Suitecivil your a pussy ass bitch i'd fucken kick your ass any fucken day you little bitch face cunt fuck you and fuck barcelona. | 0.998339 | 1 | 1 |
@WolfgangAbedeus @NickFilancia80 @clair3ismon3y You can tease this dick faggot | 0.994748 | 1 | 1 |
Eat Shit
Eat shit and die arseface mutherlicker137.240.136.80 | 0.995798 | 1 | 1 |
Their destructive nature that seems to destroy everyone with their taints should be removed from Wikipedia. | 0.078002 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Think before you type"" is a useful rule for anybody, including myself. On what basis do you infer that it could be intended as a ""slur""? Your readiness to dig up any miserable morsel of insult in an archived copy of a pre-edited text reveals a paltry, morbid, prejudicial character. No, your unconvincing ""irony"" won't get you out of the trap that you prepared for yourself: humans in The Last Castle have enslaved the Meks. That makes this book ""partially centered around two societies, one human and one alien, one of which has enslaved members of the other, to their mutual discomfort."" And that is all I am saying, barring unsolicited interpreters of plain English. " | 0.008034 | 0 | 0 |
RT @_Creamm_: @Victoria_Finae dont mind my retarded ass😂 | 0.940364 | 1 | 1 |
, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind. I find the Arb template I am supposed to use. talk-email 19:04 | 0.000637 | 0 | 0 |
@n0tsteven ily 2, I'm at work bitch do you even have any battle ready blades? | 0.935005 | 1 | 1 |
It is verifiably sourced that he makes some claims. There are not sources that validate if those claims are true or not. I believe you can add arbitrary fields to any infobox for them to display cant you? | 0.019302 | 0 | 0 |
Ima rude son of a bitch too because I have a period remember im gay... | 0.996226 | 1 | 1 |
You're right. I don't like how Wikipedia works, I don't like any of the experienced editors. I shouldn't be here. I did not insult anyone because I think I'm better. I do not want a Wikipedia page for your previously stated reasons. I use Wikipedia and consider it credible.nif anyone can tell you how big my dick is, it's me. Neither you nor your website give me any clout. I wasn't promoting. What am I going to say, hey go check out my Wikipedia. Fuck you, your editor friends and Wikipedia. And fuck my Wikipedia page I dont want one
add that to my wiki
I hope they ban me and delete my account so I don't have to do it | 0.992715 | 1 | 1 |
your a fucking bell end | 0.997326 | 1 | 1 |
Fuck you - you self-righteous creep. | 0.997975 | 1 | 1 |
. Go away, you're not providing value here | 0.085496 | 0 | 0 |
The idea that this planet is not at all like Mars is false. To say it is like Earth is even more false. The Earth is not tidally locked and the heat recieved by this planet as stated in the primary source is inargualby closer to Mars than it is to the Earth. Adding the GHG effect of the Earth to the Equlibrium temperature of the Earth yeilds 15°C according to the paper. But in the case of this planet, adding the GHG effect of Earth to Gliese 581 g at an equlibrium temperature of 209 K (-64 °C) that would then yield a temperature of 224 K (-49°C), and so it is ridiculous to suggest that the comparison is not relevant. Depending on the size of the actual atmosphere the planet could be even colder than Mars. | 0.001076 | 0 | 0 |
@red_is_raw lol yeah birds be chirping outside. Bastards. | 0.957834 | 1 | 1 |
🕛 is the most important thing. All this temporary bullshit and lies is fa the birds. Kill that ! | 0.984666 | 1 | 1 |
Vandalism Removal
Although disagreeing with the validity of such a diet I am sure that the word 'penis' does not belong half way down the section on it's own. As such I have gelded this article and removed it's penis. I couldn't be bothered to sign in to do it but thought I'd better announce it here in case somebody reverted my edit and brought the penis back. 194.223.81.88 | 0.032499 | 0 | 0 |
???
Is the Vision image even an issue? I uploaded that weeks ago. The image I uploaded was clearer and had better colouring (obvious). I'm sure no one is even worrying about png, jpg etc. As for abbreviations, that's also a non-isse. Just retitle if unhappy. | 0.001133 | 0 | 0 |
"
CVU Anti-Vandalism Award I have been fighting for TRANSWOMEN and for the rights of people who are brutalized everyday for their identified sexual preferences. I frequently undue damage done to pages of so called 'child molestors' which is nothing but DISGUSTING ATTACKS AND HATEFUL BS. 69.165.137.233 " | 0.51146 | 1 | 1 |
likes it up the butt | 0.879111 | 1 | 1 |
I give my niggas hope and sell these bitches dreams! | 0.995165 | 1 | 1 |
" 2007 (UTC)
In the light of what you said, especially as this is heading for FAC, it would be best if this were in BrEng. Strong national ties and all that. TALK 07:38, 2 November" | 0.000547 | 0 | 0 |
"
Horrifyingly enough, ""ritualistic penis flagellation"" is underselling the true nightmare that is the opening scene of any Hanzo film. But it'll do, because an encyclopaedia is generally not meant to contain the words ""brutally tenderises his own penis with a stick"". Never watch these movies." | 0.709445 | 1 | 1 |
@sheisdope_ Like ion care how “that bitch susie from work broke up with her man and she was tellin me the whole story” blah blah blah | 0.944739 | 1 | 1 |
Ok I want you to prove to me that Barack Obama is a significant historical figure. No source you can find can prove such a prediction because Wikipedia is not for crystal balling. Your arguments are pathetic. You clearly vote Republican and simply don't want this included so as not to tarnish the reputation of John Roberts. Get over it, he screwed up and it is very significant. | 0.130877 | 1 | 0 |
Looked through this article. Why do you think that RD entry is made (or meant) to irritate other users? (That wasn't the intention, however.) | 0.000584 | 0 | 0 |
Decisive victory?
Surely this battle qualifies as a decisive victory! It was the first EVER capture of a Japanese home island, it demonstrated fully that Japan was entirely vulnerable, and it also led to the destruction of an army of over 20,000 Japanese troops. And no, I'm not American, and I know I have no references, but surely we can come to some sort of consensus! ( ) | 0.000749 | 0 | 0 |
vis-a-vis the Sabbath | 0.005359 | 0 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of Kurt lockhart
A tag has been placed on Kurt lockhart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. └''''''┘┌talk┐ " | 0.000719 | 0 | 0 |
i am chilliwack you fucking moron | 0.998143 | 1 | 1 |
MY EDITS WERE LEGITIMATE
Okay!???? | 0.001823 | 0 | 0 |
Neither shows suck. Even so, comaring TS to KP is like Robt Jones to Teenage Robot - hard desicion.
THEY BOTH REALLY SUCK! Watch something worthwhile like Family Guy or King of the Hill.
That was really mean. Family Guy and King of the Hill are good shows, but so is KP. Don’t get hostile. =D
One of the things that make the show unique is that it is a comedy aimed at more than just kids, that doesn't revolve around a cliched 'loser' main character. In fact KP is the complete antithesis of a loser and so are her family and most of her friends. Even Ron doesn't really fit the stereotype. Both FG and KOTH can be funny but there comes a point when you want a break from all those cynical shows that are all about laughing at someone's ignorance and stupidity.
Hey wait a second. Totally Spies sucks. Kim Possible was good, but later jumped the shark. it then became the worst show ever (well, not as bad as totally spies or futurama, but got close). Also, as for another comment above, Teenage Robot was AWFUL. Robot Jones was way better. And as for the final one, King of the Hill was great, but Family Guy is unfunny. It is better than Futurama though, FUTURAMA WAS THE ABSOLUTE WORST THING EVER MADE!!!!
Don't watch the new KP, watch something good like King of the Hill or Shinigan Down. | 0.807914 | 1 | 1 |
I AM REALLY UPSET with his deletion nominations!!!!
Sorry, but you are an asshole
This is very insane to delete an article like this.
You are asshole master of deletions
22:18, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+685) . . User talk:PatGallacher (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Patricia Walsh) (current)
22:18, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+299) . . Patricia Walsh (Nominated page for deletion using Page Curation (subst:blp-prod))
22:11, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+184) . . Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (Reporting Novaranist. (TW))
22:10, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (-33) . . m Hans Kohala (Reverted 1 edit by Novaranist (talk) to last revision by Severo. (TW)) (current)
22:08, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (-82) . . Most Extreme Airports (current)
22:04, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+861) . . N User talk:Matt8600 (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Iustin beldie)
22:03, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+678) . . N User talk:Timostaurus (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Scott Wornow)
22:01, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+829) . . N User talk:Mason Decker1 (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Mario Kart/Characters) (current)
21:58, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+877) . . N User talk:Nathanielpopoca (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Nathaniel Popoca)
21:57, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+865) . . N User talk:Iustin444 (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Matei Berceanu) (current)
21:56, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+417) . . User talk:Novaranist (Only warning: Vandalism. (TW))
21:54, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+858) . . N User talk:Zachlyda (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Zachary Lyda) (current)
21:53, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+836) . . N User talk:Novaranist (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Pornography in North Korea)
21:49, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+8) . . User:Tentinator/Articles Created (current)
21:48, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+143) . . N User:Tentinator/Articles Created (←Created page with 'This is a list of all the articles that I've created. First Catilinarian Conspiracy Second Catilinarian Conspiracy In Toga Candida')
21:35, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+861) . . N User talk:Jaylentable (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Beautybaby44) (current)
20:12, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+883) . . N User talk:Conservationscience (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Conservation evidence) (current)
20:12, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+844) . . N User talk:Prasadaman (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Aman prasad) (current)
20:11, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+1,737) . . User talk:Liberalufp (Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Word windowism. (TW))
16:38, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+788) . . N User talk:Lunedeep (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Lune deep)
16:16, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+830) . . User talk:Blackiedog (Notifying author of deletion nomination for List of King Kongs)
15:58, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+917) . . N User talk:Giovz17 (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Special/wiki/Special:Preferences) (current)
15:57, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+838) . . N User talk:Jarmanpreet Sandhu (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Jarmanpreet sandhu) (current)
11:31, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+886) . . N User talk:Rpriykant (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Moneyroot Consultancy) (current)
10:53, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+808) . . N User talk:Pregish (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Pergasus Syangbo)
10:36, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+645) . . N User talk:Shresthaprabhu (General note: Removal of content, blanking. (TW)) (current)
10:33, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+850) . . N User talk:Espabangalore (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Elements spa) (current)
10:33, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+855) . . N User talk:Jadurkupi (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Music marketing) (current)
10:16, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+700) . . User talk:Jb1944 (Notifying author of deletion nomination for John Alderton (medic))
10:03, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+791) . . User talk:Hikogaratashi (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Brooks kossover) (current) | 0.746047 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Jojo_51213: What was that you tweeted? I can't concentrate enough to read it over all your sad-looking boob and pussy pics.
-men, prob… | 0.783012 | 1 | 1 |
Hmm, I do see your point. Thanks, | 0.000551 | 0 | 0 |
Briefcase
Too much importance is given to the briefcase in this article, hence my cutting of two unecessary sentences. | 0.000632 | 0 | 0 |
if dey go to linch together, she gon eat that pussy befo they come back.... | 0.986563 | 1 | 1 |
Metric warrior
Michael, could you see [here, and on his talk page. This user is ignoring the US-reelated aspect ot WP:UNIT to enforce his pro-metric POV on US-related articles. I've left a note on his talk page, both last Msay and today, short but polite, but he is accusing me of not being civil! I'm really not in the mood for dealing with this sort of user today, so please help! Thanks. - | 0.000672 | 0 | 0 |
WP:POV
I suggest you read up on Wikipedia policies, as most your edits are biased and unhelpful. They mostly consist of either inserting Persian views or deleting references to non-Persian cultures. Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia preseting a neutral point of view WP:NPOV and most of your edits violate this principle. I have reverted them and I recommend you to acquaint yourself with Wikipedia policies and to follow them rather than any nationlist agenda. | 0.000662 | 0 | 0 |
"
SPANIARDS ARE NOT WHITE?? OH LORD
51% euro/black and 46% black,that is 46% afro decent and 51% afro-mixed decent,that makes it neutral, becuase Mulatto is a separate racial group, they view themselves different from the Blacks. Now, if you have a problem with that, which you certainly have, then that don't belong in this article. It is an accurate description of DR demographics, and CCNY-DS,KNOWS IT, and WILL agree and cooperate. You can go and take your radical afrocentrism to Maulana Karenga.
and example is the demographics that show about El Salvador in wiki, it says "" 90% mestizo,9% white,1% indian"". In my personal opinion, Indian might be more percentage, some mestizos might look "" more indian than 50/50 or 40/60. Since Mestizos DUE view themselves different from Indians, why don't you go and invade the article and type "" 91% of Salvadoreans are of amerindian decent"". 90% amerindian-mixed population "" doesn't equate to "" amerinidan decent"". that just creates confusion. So if other articles of latin american countries can word it like that? why not DR?? platanogenius" | 0.052299 | 0 | 0 |
How much longer will she over-pronounce her 'g's before someone tells her it's really obnoxious and she hires a speech coach? | 0.012487 | 0 | 0 |
":::::::::: That's a pretty strained argument. I am using the Bible's POV only to argue that this is an article about a Biblical story, and that the views of those belief-systems that include the Bible, with many millions of followers around the world, do (believe it or not) actually have some relevance here... therefore it is what we call a ""significant"" view, and we cannot assert or imply that any of the significant views are either true or false, historical or fictional. Is that not clear enough? (ውይይት)
" | 0.000621 | 0 | 0 |
"
Possibly unfree Image:Afif-Safieh.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Afif-Safieh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -T " | 0.000541 | 0 | 0 |
hey
hey faggot, are you dead yet? or are you watching your mom getting raped by filthy pigs? which one is it? | 0.997724 | 1 | 1 |
"
You're both wrong. Stop this useless shouting match immediately. If you don't stop, I'll block you, and this goes for you both. - (conspire | past ops) " | 0.047474 | 0 | 0 |
The box is not silly but unnecessary and distracting. The box is already too long (you have to scroll to see the whole list and it has a potential to get longer certainly. This kind of the box is only useful and necessary in cases like 1) the article is separated into several pages because the article would be too long if those were in one page. 2) The article is about one entity among several ones. There is no much relationship between real and natural numbers except they are numbers. You want me to convince you then can I also ask you to convince me first? To my knowledge, there was no consensus about having such a box. In other words, I am just reverting the article to what it used to be and see if we can have concensus or something. 03:04, Mar 28, 2004 (UTC) | 0.000795 | 0 | 0 |
Update
Taxonomy of Banksia integrifolia and Banksia integrifolia#Taxonomy are in my opinion done. I'll be moving on to distribution and habitat tomorrow. Thanks for your patience. ;-) Hesperian | 0.000655 | 0 | 0 |
}}
{{WikiProject New Zealand
|class=C
|importance=low
|politics=yes
|politics-importance=low | 0.000932 | 0 | 0 |
Stern fixed the image of the league.. NBA players not knocking they bitch out in elevators. | 0.605565 | 1 | 1 |
"
Keegan found a proxy in one of the last socks though.— (琉竜) " | 0.000951 | 0 | 0 |
"
Each of the examples you give are either: (a) just two nouns conjoined by the word ""and"" (a la France and Germany); or (b) an determined reading not to interpret ""Britain and Ireland"" as another way of saying ""British Isles"" (contrary to the sources on that page and a la those pedantic arguments that if it doesn't include the Isle of Man then it cannot mean the ""British Isles"").
WRT your suggestion for a dab page links: UKGBI is about as reasonable as it gets but even when that polity existed ""Britain and Ireland"" was not a common term for it (a la GB and GBR, not BI or even GBI, for the country code) and it isn't today. In contrast, it is a common name of the topic described at British Isles.
Why not have it as a seperate article on terminology? Because Terminology of the British Isles already exits. Why not redirect to the terminology page? Because the title is an another name for the topic described at British Isles not the one described at Terminology of the British Isles.
Why are you so resistant to it being so when it is supported by secondary sources? Why are you suggesting that it be a dab page, an article of its own, redirected elsewhere ... anything but redirected to British Isles - where even in the lead to that article the phrase is bolded as another term for that topic? RA " | 0.000712 | 0 | 0 |
Geneology
This part of the article, especially the last sentence, is POV. | 0.00058 | 0 | 0 |
"
Dear DCstats and ERosa
Starting a new section here because the preceding is hopelessly indented.
DCstats and ERosa, you are mistaken in your thinking. Jdannan and Avenue are quite correct. I know this might be very difficult for you to accept. You claim to have references supporting your interpretation. However, I think you are misinterpreting the statements from the textbooks you are reading. I can't speak for your ""petroleum industry statistican"" friend. My guess is that you conveyed your misinterpretation of the situation to him/her. I have a ph.d. in mathematics and after reading this talk page and thinking I was almost losing my mind, I consulted with several other ph.d. mathematician and statistician friends of mine who confirmed that Jdannan and Avenue are indeed correct. And the interpretation given in the article is basically correct as well. In fact, it's the interpretation I've seen given in every stats book I've looked at.
Some references, since these seem to be very important to people:
""Warning! There is much confusion about how to interpret a confidence interval. A confidence interval is not a probability statement about θ since θ is a fixed quantity, not a random variable."" — Larry Wasserman, All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference, p. 92
""CAUTION! A 95% confidence interval does not mean that there is a 95% probability that the interval contains μ. Remember, probability describes the likelihood of undetermined events. Therefore, it does not make sense to talk about the probability that the interval contains μ, since the population mean is a fixed value. Think of it this way: Suppose I flip a coin and obtain a head. If I ask you to determine the probability that the flip resulted in a head, it would not be 0.5, because the outcome has already been determined. Instead the probability is 0 or 1. Confidence intervals work the same way. Because μ is already determined, we do not say that there is a 95% probability that the interval contains μ."" — Michael Sullivan III, Statistics: Informed Decisions Using Data, p. 453
""The idea of interval estimation is complicated; an example is in order. Suppose that, for each λ, x is a real random variable normally distributed about λ with unit variance; then, as is very easy to see with the aid of a table of the normal distribution, if M(x) is taken to be the interval [x − 1.9600, x + 1.9600], then (1) P(λ in M(x) | λ) = α, where α is constant and almost equal to 0.95. It is usually thought necessary to warn the novice that such an equation as (1) does not concern the probability that a random variable λ lies in a fixed set M(x). Of course, λ is given and therefore not random in the context at hand; and given λ, α is the probability that M(x), which is a contraction of x, has as its value an interval that contains λ."" — Leonard J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics, p. 260
Your misunderstanding seems to be based on an inadequate grasp of a few facts:
The population mean μ is a fixed constant, not a random variable.
The endpoints of the confidence interval are random variables, not fixed constants.
A statement about the level of confidence of a confidence interval is a probabilistic statement about the endpoints of the interval considered as random variables.
The issue about whether μ is ""known"" or not is a complete red herring. What matters is that μ is fixed, not whether it's ""known"". This also has absolutely nothing to do with probabilistic interpretations of quantum physics, good lord.
Let me go through an example which has the most simplifying assumptions. Suppose we have a normally distributed random variable X on a population with mean μ = 100 and standard deviation σ = 16, and suppose we select samples of size n = 100. Then the sample mean X-bar is a sampling distribution defined on the space of all possible samples of size 100, and it has mean μ = 100 and standard deviation σ/sqrt(n) = 16/sqrt(100) = 16/10 = 1.6. A 95% confidence interval for μ based on this sampling is then given by (X-bar − zα/2*σ/sqrt(n), X-bar + zα/2*σ/sqrt(n)) = (X-bar − (1.96)*1.6, X-bar + (1.96)*1.6) = (X-bar − 3.136, X-bar + 3.136).
Now, note the following facts:
The confidence interval is defined to be a random interval, i.e. the endpoints of the confidence interval are random variables defined in terms of the sample mean X-bar.
We ""know"" what the population mean μ is, and yet we wer | 0.000792 | 0 | 0 |
You probably noticed that the stl template can now be used to group articles under a number of various working groups. I've been working through Category:Unassessed St. Louis articles and slowly rating and sorting articles. Generally, the work is pretty easy, but i do have a problem with certain businesses, musuems, parks, and other minor things. They don't specifically belong to of the working groups I made, and I am very reluctant to begin new working groups because there are already way too many. The education group, which is shaping up nicely is a bit overloaded. I'm trying to decide if I should group all the museums under them or not. Musuems may also be categorized under buildings and structures and therefore architecture, and some of them can fall under History. I made a proto-list at List of museums in Greater St. Louis which seems like a useful place to work from, but should I really make a museums working group? Alternately I could just leave all the museums without a group and just let them fall under the general wikiproject. What are your thoughts? | 0.000564 | 0 | 0 |
This can no longer be considered a good article.
Recent damaging changes by NorthBySouthBaranof should either be removed, or remove this article from the featured section.
Problems include sources that are lying. And a complete lack of care for the neutral point of view you guys always go on about. Specifically in terms of the Gamergate section
North should face sanctions and this article should be fixed. Thanks 71.192.72.22 | 0.000713 | 0 | 0 |
Oh and also I was reading stuff about me in your talk thing and by the way I'm a he, not a she, just so you know. | 0.000757 | 0 | 0 |
@JZolly23 @HannahKubiak Everybody knows that bitches love mullets #Pantiedropin | 0.952686 | 1 | 1 |
I've done a bit more - but still loads to do here! | 0.000672 | 0 | 0 |
Blood this nigga Dion retarded | 0.987945 | 1 | 1 |
"
First, you are misreading what your first source is. The document you reference is a UN interum report on Resolution 425. 425 dates back to 1978. That document (the report) does not reflect any agreement between the UN and Israel. 425 calls for many things, but there had been no public pledge from Israel on dismantling the SLA. In fact, Israel in public had been saying the opposite. They were not planning to leave until early July. The report being issued on the 22nd isn't very meaningful. Its coincidence. There was a whole series of meetings between the SLA (see later material) and UN/various countries that was a whole lot more damaging than the interium erport on 425.
Second, I think its better to deal with Charbel Barakat's fuller and more accurate version of what happened in May from his congressional testimony in June 2000:
""During the month of May 2000 our people remitted a memorandum to the office of the United Nations in Nakura in south Lebanon offering suggestions to avoid bloodshed and exodus. During the same month delegations representing our community met with diplomats of the US, UK, and French embassies in Israel and at the United Nations. And on May 18, our representatives met with the office of the Secretary General of the United Nations in New York ... Instead of taking our demands for protection on our land seriously, the United Nations declined to assist us ... The United States, UK and France dismissed our fears and insisted on guarantees which were allegedly granted by the Beirut regime ... The State of Israel only prepared for our potential exodus, ruling out our determination to remain on our land and defend ourselves.""
""Despite the abandonment by the international community and against all odds, our people decided to remain and fight for their land and rights while calling endlessly on the UN to deploy its units around our villages.
On May 22, 2000, and as Israeli units were implementing their own withdrawal and the commander of the SLA was absent in France, the mostly Shiite sector of the security zone collapsed. It appeared that Shiite officers were told by the Israelis that they must leave before the borders closed. Even after the invasion of Hizbollah of this area, the mostly Christian-Druse eastern enclave and the Christian western enclave, decided to defend themselves and protect their citizens after Israel’s withdrawal.
On May 23, 2000, at 8 PM, SLA officers in the western sector received orders from the Israelis to leave their posts as Hizbollah was advancing towards their villages. Thus the SLA was imploded from the inside and was dismantled without any battle. The main reason why the SLA did not remain and fight was the fact that the border was closed behind its back. Without access to medical and logistical supplies, our people was condemned either to surrender to its enemy or flee across the border."" (from [www.10452lccc.com/special%20studies/barakatjune2000.htm])
The SLA did collapse. What Charbel Barakat is talking about in the MEF comments is that the remainder of the SLA (Christian) in the west did not collapse and was dismanted by Israel. But it was only dismanted after most of the SLA had collapsed. Charbel Barakat and other dead-enders may have wanted (in theory anyway) to fight on in the west, but Israel wasn't going to make any commitment to keep a miniture version of the SLA going in a tiny pocket on the west end of the border. The caution I would give about Barakat and a couple others from the SLA is that sometimes they think of their Christian portion of the SLA as if it were the entire SLA. And from that point of view, the SLA did not collapse and was dismantled by Israel.
The biggest claim made by Barakat is in weasel-words: ""It appeared that Shiite officers were told by the Israelis that they must leave"". 'It appeared that"" means he is guessing. Nobody on either side of the border has outright claimed that the Shites were told to leave and that is why they collapsed on the 22nd. Even Barakat is unwilling to make that claim.
Now lots of other things may have happened that the public doesn't know about with regard to the SLA collapse. But the only people who would know the truth are a handful of people at the top of the Israeli government and army. Nobody in the SLA knows much of anything because if Israel was going to collapse them, they would hardly tell them their plan. People (including me) can make lots of hunches and theories about what might have happened, but there are no facts to back any of those theories up. " | 0.00065 | 0 | 0 |
Room for improvement?
The Spanish version of this article goes into a far greater depth - is there any chance of using material from that version, once translated, in here? | 0.000577 | 0 | 0 |
your boring
and retarded two | 0.935458 | 1 | 1 |
FUCK YOU! GO SUCK COCK YOU FUCKING COCK SUCKERS! | 0.998249 | 1 | 1 |
" November 2010 (UTC)
CS, if you give me (or one of my Talk Page Stalkers) permission, we can just copy some of the basic parts to your Archive subpage and your talk page, to get you going. Then you will just need to change the image. I have the search tool on my userpage because I don't know how to add it elsewhere I'm not that good at this stuff, set mine up by copying other people. (Talk) 13:07, 14" | 0.000599 | 0 | 0 |
"
The Grifters tells the story of Lilly Dillon
I thought it was more about the Cusac character.
It tells the interlocking stories of three characters. None of the three should be considered the ""main"" character. -The'FortyFive' " | 0.000586 | 0 | 0 |
@SammyLightning_ I got hoes in different area codes | 0.006668 | 0 | 1 |
"
What???!!! What? Has reason finally prevailed???? I proceeded to edit the Rand piece as promised just supra , lo and behold, LaVey had been subject to a waylay. He's no longer in the ""influenced"" box. What happened? Who did the dirty job? Why? Again, I'm obssessed with reasoned discourse. AOluwatoyin" | 0.003582 | 0 | 0 |
Andor Szentivanyi was Dean of Medicine from lobbying for Moffitt's construction to a few days before Moffitt's grand opening. From 1980 to 1986, Andor Szentivanyi ran the college of medicine. | 0.000802 | 0 | 0 |
RT @PhillyTheBoss: "Eating pussy" ... makes sense. RT @Minnie__804: Y'all gotta grow up. Food and sex go hand n hand. | 0.980148 | 1 | 1 |
"the process of making an informed decision.
What's an RFC?
(outdent) Request for Comment.
I am sure that DG wasn't implying that I was atempting to conceal the prior conversation. - (cast a spell) " | 0.000613 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hey yo Curps I have been trying to keep it real here on wikipedia making helpful additions and so on and when I was searching some articles this caught my eye
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Game_Hunters_(sketch_comedy)
I do not know how to request an article for deletion so I thought I'd bring it to your attention since u seem to have your business pretty together
As I understand it this article is almost definately written by someone in the group and that is not allowed I think? also if you serach these cats in google nothing comes back so it is pretty much ""Unremarkable People or Group"" (As listed under Speedy Deletion Guidelinezz) matter if u ask me
hope I was of some help, thinking maybe about registerin a name on the site and adding some fresh new information about the author George Saunders, he is great
your friend,
66.229.17.88" | 0.009016 | 0 | 0 |
Hello Wikipelli. Yes, it is a controvertial addition, but people just can't walk around deleting things they don't like, as many IP editors have been doing here. It is a cited point from a noteworthy third party source. She lacks her own page, but she is certainly a student at this school and is as notable as an alumni - it IS news. Funny how no one is complaining about Michael Skakel. But, I agree, the first source does not cite the school. I've added two more to rectify that. Best, | 0.000789 | 0 | 0 |
"
I wish I could, Psychohistorian, but I can't as I have been gagged by an administrator who considers I am something of a ""systematic personal attacker"", no matter I had no complaints before.
Honestly, I suggest you to take a break and leave the article to Stormfront for a while. You can always retake it later, nominate the article for deletion, open an RfC, etc.
Do not violate the 3RR please. It's better to bear a bad article than to be blocked on unquestionable grounds as that.
But personally I am quitting it for mental health. I have more than enough with appealing my unjust block and other areas that interest me more than a non-existent race. Maybe, if my appeal succeeds, and after a loooong recess, I might retake it. But not right now. Sorry. " | 0.003785 | 0 | 0 |
.@SenBlumenthal ➡️ Liar. Just like your “service in Vietnam.” BTW, Liar they’re ILLEGAL Immigrants aka Invaders. Glad I could educate you, dummy. #StopTheInvasion #DeportThemAll #BuildTheWall | 0.921233 | 1 | 1 |
Do you suck dick private? BULL SHIT! I bet you could suck a golf ball through a garden hose! |Talk | 0.998349 | 1 | 1 |
Pure trolling
hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moronhi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moronhi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moronhi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron | 0.97498 | 1 | 1 |
RT @philiciaaaa: mcm 😍
bc tomorrow's 6 months 💘
Fuck everyone who said we wouldn't last. Proved you bitches wrong @tropicaldrew_ http://t.… | 0.989919 | 1 | 1 |
(Personal attacks or harassment) ( | 0.0008 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.