text
stringlengths
7
5k
degree_of_toxicity
float64
0
1
contains_offensive_word
int64
0
1
label
int64
0
1
No, you were trying to sound cool but ended up sounding like a retard.
0.950194
1
1
" I have no problem with the goal, but the ""add first, supply support later (only when forced)"" approach doesn't seem to be in line with Wikipedia requirements that the verifiability for everything be established within the article (and though, for example, I accept TR as a given, I'm sure lots of people consider saying eight presidents and a lot of other notable people were in the NRA to be contentious – for that matter, I wouldn't be surprised if someone [not me] challenged the NRA's site as being an SPS). Thanks for clearing up (so far I've noticed) Kennedy, Sheridan, Ike & Reagan... "
0.00053
0
0
my right ear is throbbing harder than a virgins pussy
0.986561
1
1
THE OFFICIAL DEATH CERTIFICATE BY RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SAYS DEC 21 1879 AND YOUR OTHER LANGUAGE WIKIPEDIAS SAY SAME, GROW UP, WILL YOU!
0.506353
1
1
"==Disgusting== This guy is a disgusting sex columnist. He revels in it. He does it on purpose, and it's what gives him and his column their edge. It seperates him from every other sex advice giver I've ever read and it's his signature attitude, tone, and approach to the issues. But there seems to be no way to adduce this highly pertinent and relevant information without violating the lame, loose, sloppy, ill-thought-out NPOV rule. Hilariously (and disgustingly), people tell me providing this information violates article ""neutrality."" Any help here by any person of quality, integrity, and intelligence would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.129.156 (talk) Imagine that a sex columnist who enjoys sex. How can we work that into the article? ;-) Nik (talk) What, Nik? Hello? ...I would still like to hear an answer to my question if anyone out there has any integity and intelligence. Is insight and perceptivity BANNED on Wikipedia? Must everything be banal and bland?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.129.156 (talk) I marvel a bit that even my attempt to DISCUSS this issue gets censored repeatedly (by anonymous censors who do nothing on Wikipedia save delete THIS). Must even the DISCUSSION of this issue be censored and not allowed to exist? I'm a longtime reader and fan of Dan Savage, but he IS a distinctive columnist with a distinctive style. Must even a DISCUSSION of that uniqueness which goes unmentioned in the article, due to phony NPOV considerations be rigorously censored? "
0.733972
1
1
" History and ethnogenesis This part of the article is total crap! It is written by some incompetent greeks probably. Neither the bulgarians are slavs, neither ""byzantine""!!!"
0.865437
1
0
RT @44BINKO: @BreadTruckkBri 😂😂😂 knwin I heard dat hoe changed
0.100354
1
1
REDIRECT User talk:Arre 9/December 2011 Archive
0.000638
0
0
the ass so you can see what it feels like!!!
0.982529
1
1
"{| class=""infobox"" width=""315px"" |- ! align=""center"" | Archives |- | Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 |} Thanks for Bethlehem work Hi I just wanted to stop by and say thank you for your efforts in copyediting the Bethlehem article. I'm trying to improve it for GA status,per it being the Collaboration of the Week for Wikipedia:WikiProject Palestine. Award for your great photographic work The da Vinci Barnstar This award is given to may be awarded to anyone who has enhanced Wikipedia through their technical work..."" and you most certainly deserve it. Sincerely, Thank you, Izak, for that very heartwarming award. That someone has noticed my contributions and sees them as noteworthy makes all the hard work worthwhile. Hi Gila: Yes, you make beautiful art and I appreciate it as I am sure many others do. Best wishes, Hi Gila: It's agood idea to have page for awards and barnstars, like so: Armenian Genocide Peres' denial of the genocide should be noted in this article, failing to do so makes it more of a hagiography than a biography. His shortcomings must also be mentioned in addition to his feats like winning the noble prize. Do you think it'd fit better in political views? In anycase it must, and will, be mentioned somewhere. How about adding this in his political views segment: Peres' foreign policy outlook is markedly realist. For example, to placate Turkey, the only significant Muslim country in the region that is friendly towards Israel, Peres has explicity denied the Armenian genocide, which caused an uproar among genocide scholars.(citation) Peres made these statements in 2001, when he was foreign minister. Clearly, he was caving in to Turkish pressure. Israel has very few friends and cannot afford to lose them, so basically it is not free to take the position that would seem to mesh with its outlook and history, which is to recognize that the Armenians were murdered en mass. Now he is president, an honorary position, not a political one, and his ""views,"" whatever they may have been back then, are worth about as much as mine are. I have no problem with mentioning this ""view"" in the section on his political outlook, but a separate section on this one utterance gives it undue importance and distorts the picture. sumac opening sentence I don't know what the right wording is, but do you see the problem with ""Sumac (also Rhus) is a genus of approximately 250 species of flowering plants in the family Anacardiaceae""? First of all, there is no reason to italicize Sumac. Secondly, it is not accurate to say ""Sumac is a genus"" because there is no genus called Sumac (but there is one called Rhus). I may be too steeped in botanical jargon to easily come up wi
0.000721
0
0
I'd rather be a troll than the north end of a south bound mule.
0.290895
1
1
RT @CapoToHeaven Niggas will cheat and not even know that bitch name. That shit aint cheating.
0.997489
1
1
I am still a gigantic faggot
0.856492
1
1
rDNS Actually no, sir. You removed the wrong sentence. According to RFC1912 an IP-address can only resolve into ONE hostname (which is logical, since otherwise it wouldn't be resolving to a name at all). That was exactly my point: The RFC is this strict because it assures auth options, like whitelisting and such. Since only one name can resolve out of each IP-address, and unique IPv4 addresses are hard to come by these days, there is no way to keep combining the two. My statement was entirely correct, so I will reverse your stupid changes.
0.039245
0
0
Get someone to agree with you.
0.00077
0
0
Hi again! I have changed now and you can change so that it will be like the number 5 in my evidence cause I dont know how to do. Anyway, I found evidence that 250 000 died and I have tousand more evidence if you want.
0.021238
0
0
, 11 November 2010 (UTC) I'm afraid I'm unable to accept that. If you've missed my quotes, then you based your statements and accusations on your own fantasy, did you not? 17:03
0.001596
0
0
Bachelor Number One The song on the matrix album has a song titled 'Summertime' by Bachelor Number one which has the sound of Sublime and sublime is mentioned numerous time. Is this song officially credited to Sublime, etc?
0.000574
0
0
Broken Link The first external link is broken: http://www.cyberkineticsinc.com/content/medicalproducts/braingate.jsp
0.000616
0
0
Careful there - the combination of straw men and blowing so much smoke could be a fire hazard.
0.003411
0
0
Stressed out? Your contributions are huge, but I recommend stepping back from the stuff and start writing some articles again...I don't know all your interests, but there are over a thousand redlined links of unwritten articles which you can find through Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected Areas and or just go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected Areas/Status and follow the links to lists of wilderness areas, national forests and fish and wildlife areas. Maybe that gives you more stress. It's so easy to get drawn into this thing, I would stop placing stress on yourself to feel the need to contribute more than you feel comfortable or in areas that you feel burned out in. Just a few thoughts.
0.004449
0
0
Good article Thank you for reviewing Search engine optimization and promoting it to good article! (Talk/Contrib)
0.000554
0
0
Bitzy probably popped a Percocet before she had these drinks with Mellie. She seems like that kind of of trill ol' bitch. #ScandalABC
0.88418
1
1
" Actually my position is that Dummett being shocked is as much a fact about Frege as the fact that ""the sky is blue"" (also interesting) is a fact about Frege. Tkuvho, however is on a crusade against anti-semitism, and feels that the article needs something POV that tells the reader that Frege needs to be condemned for being one. Apparently merely stating that Frege is an anti-semite based on the contents of the 1924 diary and letting the reader be the judge isn't enough. "
0.000934
0
0
Which may well be true, but I only noticed it because I occasionally use an old computer with Windows XP SP2 I think and noticed that all Chinese characters appear as squares. I'm sure lots of people are still using XP.
0.000578
0
0
When my right hand get out niggas gon remember why we tru loyal pussy
0.982494
1
1
I can be a bitch and I'm fine with that😌
0.957689
1
1
Hopefully this niggah buys my gamma 11's cause I want them
0.964966
1
1
NO! NOT SPIKE! Please not Spike...why... (I wasn't aware of this one...)...Stop, let us pray! (that this madness will end...)
0.025102
0
0
She was like ima need you to write a statement. Bitch write yourself a diet! It's always the old people trying to snitch, bitch
0.990209
1
1
", 7 September 2006 (UTC) Until their site gets more press, it's a non issue. Of course, when/if they do, I have to admit I will look forward on principle to it's immediate recreation should they gain notability/noteriety in the press to merit inclusion. (T) 00:40"
0.000541
0
0
I don't care how old I am, when you put me in front of a bag of takis I'll eat that bitch
0.994747
1
1
@bijoudulcet geminis rule hoe. 😌
0.002089
0
1
Fake ass hoes all around
0.986686
1
1
hope you ROT IN HELL YOU MOTHER FUCKING IDIOT! PERISH IN THE FLAMING BOWELS OF HELL! I HOP THAT YOU DIE ALONE, AND SAD you FUCKER! I NEED YOU TO PERISH! END UR LIFE RIGHT NOW
0.996205
1
1
I perceive a very strong emotional response here. First of all, you seem to be adopting a position that you deem to be somehow 'correct'. I do not see what makes your POV more relevant or acceptable that other peoples'. Are you entitled to make pronouncements on behalf of English Wikipedia? If so, who appointed you to this role? I have no relationship with this particular editor, or any other for that matter. My revert has been simply an expression of my opinion as I was entirely unaware of the history behind this. However, I do not understand why you take it upon yourself to pass judgment as to what constitutes a 'correct position'. 71.39.6.142
0.000571
0
0
You Suck, her's why Your Spanish name, your shitbrown attitude, your out-right stupidity...the list goes on and on. You're probably one of those silly shitbags who gets nailed to a cross on Easter as well. Slurp shit and die.
0.997199
1
1
I'm an idiot , everybody knows that my page is inundated with complaints from people all of them harrassing me because I'm deleting thing I knopw nothing about.
0.41279
1
1
If u bad niggas a really play nice to get to the pussy then... that ass gone 😂
0.995998
1
1
!@elenakoshkaxoxo will do anything to be a member of your guild, you can use her up, she loves to choke on cocks and her pussy stays wet all day! Your mission is to prove that you are a sword slinger !
0.990456
1
1
) The sources cited in the article are, and always have been, reliable...ABC news, Popular Science, Esquire magazine, and so on. Anyone who thinks that these sources are not legitimate by Wikipedia standards has a severe reading comprehension problem. You are vandalizing a legitimate Wikipedia entry. I'm requesting that you desist. (By the way, that's non-negotiable.
0.004742
0
0
RT @nrana777: girl logic: "if I say bye I don't actually mean it" then don't fucken say bye you dumb bitch.
0.994873
1
1
RT @ReggieRipBam: All I ever do is fuck bitches & count stacks
0.99621
1
1
kiss my ass jehochman - i have many ip's, have fun!!!!!
0.993615
1
1
Aaaaah, I think I understand more now. Still, no one I know has ever used my computer except me, let alone edited stuff on Wikipedia. I think it's due to the Hotspot Shield I sometimes engage. Thanks for the help!
0.000739
0
0
RT @iLGDaily: I'ma get wifey not cunt who spreads legs for anyone. Settle for nothing but the rarest. Difference better you and me lmao
0.617553
1
1
" Returned advice I strongly recommend that you look to your own inaccuracies and ramblings. It is not up to other people to correct your spelling, grammar, incorrect links, etc. If this ""article"" is the best you can do, I suggest you do as I do and simply READ Wikipedia with minimal input. "
0.00089
0
0
fuck u little bitch. im the porn king
0.998077
1
1
" I redirected it as it was just plot summary, and not really ""deserving"" of being it's own page. So I moved the plot summary to the episode list and redirected the article here. Similar treatment will be given for Slayers special, but the episode summarys need reducing in size massively first. I haven't done that as I need to rewatch it first. As for it being barely mentioned, this is due to the way the article is being edited rather then anything else. Basically I've been doing things here and there, just adding release dates and sources etc as I get a few minutes and come across them. By all means add any relevant, properly sourced material you think it useful (such as release details, directors etc), but it's unlikely it will benefit from going back to being a seperate article. It's definately not a question of favouritism or anything else, it's just a work in progress. Unfortunately Slayers isn't a priority for my editing, so it's very much stop/start at this end. I'm happy to provide example pages if it helps. "
0.000585
0
0
" Wat she meant to say was ""Rob is a crybaby, we are tired of hearing from him so please leave him alone"". rob is trouble and has been for years but no one has the sack to do anything about it. i feel ur pain."
0.081542
0
0
I'M GETTING ANGRY AT YOU!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE GETTING CLOSE TO BE BLOCKED FROM EDITING!!!!
0.542014
1
1
Wikipedia, a phenomenon tied to racist cunts? Ugh you disgust me, and now so does Wikipedia. Well done, you win, you just proved there's no point in editing this Hitlerphile circlejerk. Jews are communists/putinists!!! Fucking hell, I can't believe I spent so much time talking to you respectfully. The Prague Process which doesn't even exist is never going to work anyway, so I will just let its inevitable failure play out in front of your pathetic eyes. I'm going to have a shower to get rid of the filth I covered myself in by sinking to your level on your playing field. If anyone asks, I will cite this page and tell them that yes, the rumours are true, The Free Encyclopedia doesn't work, and controversial articles on Wikipedia are honeypots for racist cunts.
0.983772
1
1
@coL_ACHES Why do you bitch about everything?
0.988631
1
1
why did you get this IP address banned from editing wikipedia you douchen faggot go fuck your self you sutpid whore
0.998215
1
1
Put that on everything I love. Ain't no ugly bitch Finna talk to me crazy in my car. I'd put her ass out and make her walk
0.995576
1
1
@LouieVRee @TehReelHov dat bitch a tampon
0.995984
1
1
hoes even stupider
0.951494
1
1
Ah What? You gotta girlfriend? The pedophile apologizer has a girlfriend now? Does she share your view on kids? Please, please promise the world one thing. You won't have any children please, will you?! 18:44, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
0.692229
1
1
Adolf... One of these days gonna come pay you a visit. Would love for you to stick your nose in affairs that don't concern you when we meet. It's real easy to be a little wannabe Nazi while hiding in front of your little screen.
0.944762
1
1
pervert, ps karl swithwnbank wrothe this not littledan9999
0.837583
1
1
i want to speak to the manager. Do you... do you own Wikipedia now, sir Thomas? I hate you, you have no say in what I have say to the world on Wikipedia. I see your true colors, Tommy, they're ugly and gay. Like you.
0.966599
1
1
" Welp. I could remove the topic of theosophy from the segment, but ""spiritual density"" as a new age term has moved beyond theosophy, as has the entire branch of this type of cosmological model. I have only really recently just written the article... ... references to individuals listed are as examples of a higher-degree of thinking and that of service orientation. ... the original theosophical model was only the root... many ideas since have surfaced, I have tried to synthesize it the best way I could since when I stumbled upon this article it was a stub. How should I best fix it according to the above clarification? - ironyWrit"
0.000616
0
0
For what it's worth, it makes a lot of sense to me. There are many The Sun publications for instance, there is absolutely no harm at all in linking it and in fact, to some readers, it may be useful. Removing the links can only be detrimental to the article.
0.000569
0
0
@user GOP, Conservatives, Evangelicals, Traditionalists"" Catholics are all hypocrites.""
0.768674
1
1
Just incase anyone is interested my favourite hobby is playing with other peoples cock'n'balls. Superb.
0.490572
1
1
"undefined Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Monica L. Brown Hello, Miss Monica Brown! I'm . I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Monica L. Brown. You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Monica L. Brown. (talk - contribs) "
0.000569
0
0
Jackie never tried to leap out of the car. She just got and grabbed JFK's head.
0.015093
0
0
more than a month later, the idiotic back and forth continues. is dan ashley on at just 9 and 11, or is he on at 6, 9, and 11? dear god, will we ever have an authoritative answer to this burning conflict? film at eleven. so to speak.
0.53539
1
1
Heh. Suck it down chump.
0.996681
1
1
You didn't respond I'm waiting
0.001881
0
0
" False inormation in the article As you would expect, the propagandists would say and do everything to mislead us. They once again proved themselfs to be the proven LIARS we alreayd knew they were since the article wrongly states that the darker picture with the ""fall-off"" effects is the edited one, which is pure BS. The original photo is the one with the ""fall-off"" effect which was printed in The West Australian already back in august 2, 1969 (~6 min in this clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMuTiziCszU) while the lighten up picture is the EDITED version who came out much later. So unless the propaganda trolls cant find a version of THEIR claimed original version dated EARLIER than august second 1969, i suggest them to SHUTUP. Proven fake: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/Aldrin_Apollo_11_original.jpg/179px-Aldrin_Apollo_11_original.jpg Original: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg/180px-Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.145.38.53 Youtube is not a reliable source for information about a conspiracy theory. Is there a reliable source available that supports your claim? The Buzz Alrdin photo is explained at Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#Issues with crosshairs in photos. You talkin' to me? The video shows a guy holding up the actual newspaper from 2 aug 1969 to prove that the ""fall-off"" picture is how the original one looked like, but then its youtube who isnt a reliable source!? your desperate try for making a point is laughable... but i wouldnt expect more from a propaganda TROLL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.145.38.53 No, that newspaper doesn't show what the original one looks like. The original is a transparency that is in NASA's vaults. They made prints that were widely reprinted. See this for more information. You talkin' to me? Bullshit! excuses from NASA wont make it true! you have the history of that picture in the video i linked to and even the NASA site you linked to shows the fact that the darker picture is the first one, the original from 1969, while the more lighten edited version came out 1975. So why you arguing? you dont have a chance here. As i said, BRING UP a picture dated earlier than 2 aug 1969 or SHUTUP - its that simple! 91.145.38.53, please stop insulting other editors and please sign your posts, just put four tildes at the end . I dont tolerating having my talk session closed, this is what the propagandists do? censoring their opponents! Unless the propagandists cant bring up the picture THEY claim to be the original together with a date which needs to be earlier than second of august 1969, i will change the article. False misleading information should never be tolerated! Its already proven that the ""fall-off"" darker version IS the original. If anyone wants to argue, then bring up! 91.145.38.53 The propaganda liars This article is beyond laughable! Since the propagandists trash talking and like to ""debunk"" ppl like Bart Sibrel, Ralph Rene, and Bill Kaysing (with no evidence to debunk them, however) we should debunk the LIARS the propagandists listen to! ""youtube is not a reliable source"" the propagandists says... still they link to youtube videos themselfs to suit their false propaganda in a desperate act to try prove THEIR laughable points. So if they can link to youtube videos, i will do the same just to prove that THEIR sources are nothing else than FALSE PROPAGANDA. Using proven liars like Jay Windley, Phil Plait, and Svectors youtube series as some kinda evidence is laughable. I think that these trolls needs their own section! lets see what kinda ppl who is behind the sites that the propagandists always links to. Its time to face their cl
0.229728
1
1
these judges gon try & hoe Floyd if he don't show out this last round
0.006894
0
1
Never let a boy make you feel like you're anything less than a bad bitch
0.984369
1
1
sup Thanks for the anal sex yesterday! Love, George (your homosexual lover)
0.909384
1
1
He is a Tajik and thus an ethnic Persian, Tajik=Persian, idiot Pashtun Turk.84.59.202.75
0.959541
1
1
I be damn if i go ova dea n get my ass blown💣 up i kno wat it look like bitch i play 🔫Call Of Duty frequently
0.985103
1
1
" Thanks for the kind words. (talk) "
0.000528
0
0
oh no, blocked from editing a worthless wikipedia run by idjits like you, tragic.
0.873902
1
1
@kieffer_jason is that all you have to say you sound like a little bitch nagging and shit where u be at
0.988581
1
1
😂😂 niggas sending screenshots of me to they bitches like " stop texting cuh " 😭
0.97655
1
1
RT @bdha: http://t.co/zPrnmY7kQR What a shit heel.
0.973137
1
1
In the language area the FYROM language is called <>. UNBELIEVABLE LIE !!! This is f*cking unbelievable. Greece has never recognised the FYROM language as <>. Not even all countries in the world has recognised FYROM as <> to start with. This is a provokation for most of us Greeks and a HUGE HISTORICAL LIE to write that minorities in north Greece speak <>(meaning the FYROM language) especially in a Greece related article !! The citizens of FYROM have no historical connection with Ancient Makedonia and with Alexander the Great. THEY ARE LIARS !!! In the below links you will find some details of why we Greeks we will never recognise these Slavic falsifiers as <> http://history-of-macedonia.com/wordpress/2009/02/09/an-essay-about-macedonia/ http://history-of-macedonia.com/wordpress/2009/02/11/the-greeks-of-macedonia-in-slavic-sources/ http://history-of-macedonia.com/wordpress/2008/09/10/pseudomacedonians-the-fallacy-of-their-cause-by-vasil-gligorov/ http://history-of-macedonia.com/wordpress/2008/09/10/a-thesis-on-fyromian-denial-syndrom/ Also when i try to edit it some administrator\administrators start to make the usual threats that they will block my account for messing with their Pseudomakedonian language...They love having this LIE in the Greek wikipedia page i guess grrrrrrrrr
0.817747
1
1
If I was stranded on a desert island and I could only bring 1 thing, I would bring Dora. That hoe has everything in that backpack.
0.000957
0
1
RT @jessietorr: yeah "basic bitches" are a thing but how many straight white men do you know who are all the same and SO boring??
0.947298
1
1
Flag icons should not be used for the release info, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/archive31#Flags for past discussion. The superscripted country abbreviations (JPN, EUR, etc) should be wikilinked to the appropriate articles so people can easily discover what they mean; I personally would use JP and EU instead of JPN and EUR. Other than that, I have no opinion.
0.00055
0
0
For some reason I always assume guys who act like that in trucks have tiny dicks HAHA #fag
0.932868
1
1
He called himself hand banana and attempted to rape me from behind, i try not to speak to him anymore
0.866149
1
1
RT @ReeseZamora: @daxmw23 Dax we don't love these hoes
0.203416
1
1
Proposed deletion of Rosa Bonilla Hello, Hondureñodecorazon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rosa Bonilla, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Rosa Bonilla to be deleted, please add a reference to the article. If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page. Thanks,
0.000636
0
0
OK, clear enough for a peeon. , waits for audience applause, not a sausage.
0.382229
1
1
It That is what you're gonna get son! 82.132.229.92
0.023857
0
0
@ICBC_World214 @FreeBlizz_ICBC bitch bought her son some talking bout I had to get em before they sold out
0.824739
1
1
DONT SEND ME A WARNING AGAIN OR I WILL RAPE YOUR FACE AND YOUR DAD BUM HOLE
0.988232
1
1
@phreshagu_25 yeah you right and you know them Mexicans bringing all they family that hoe finna be packed
0.576387
1
0
""" company to include Comcast"
0.000681
0
0
bitches be like thanks.
0.981364
1
1
If you got a good girl don't turn her into a "bad bitch".
0.970998
1
1
"==Andrew WIlcko== Some of the people, places or things you have written about may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. "
0.000553
0
0
" October 2014 The Super Disambiguator's Bonus Barnstar The Super Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to the winners of the Disambiguation Pages With Links monthly challenge (bonus list section) who have gone above and beyond to remove ambiguous links.This award is presented to ', for successfully fixing 1966 links in the bonus list challenge of September, 2014''. ''' (sing) @ "
0.000666
0
0
@WBeezy_ call out bitch
0.987194
1
1