alozowski's picture
alozowski HF Staff
Apply Ruff
fdfafe5
# MIT License
# Copyright (c) 2024 The HuggingFace Team
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
# of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
# in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
# to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
# copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
# furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
# The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
# copies or substantial portions of the Software.
# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
# IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
# FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
# AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
# LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
# OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
# SOFTWARE.
import re
import logging
import numpy as np
from aenum import extend_enum
from lighteval.tasks.requests import Doc
from lighteval.metrics.metrics import Metrics
from lighteval.tasks.lighteval_task import LightevalTaskConfig
from lighteval.metrics.metrics_sample import JudgeLLM
from lighteval.metrics.utils.metric_utils import (
MetricUseCase,
MetricCategory,
CorpusLevelMetricGrouping,
)
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
JUDGE_ANSWER_SYSTEM_PROMPT = """You will be provided with the summary of a document, a piece of text, a question generated from that text, and the correct or "gold" answer to the question. Additionally, you will receive a model answer. Your task is to determine wether the model answer is correct using the provided "gold" answer as a reference.
# Steps
1. **Document Understanding**:
- Analyze the provided document summary to grasp the context and main themes.
2. **Chunk Understanding**:
- Examine the provided text (chunk) to understand its content.
3. **Question Understanding**:
- Interpret the given question to fully comprehend what is being asked.
4. **Ground Truth Answer Understanding**:
- Understand the provided ground truth answer, identifying its key points.
5. **Answer Understanding**:
- Examine the Model Answer, identifying key points and assessing accuracy and factuality.
6. **Final Answer**:
- 0 or 1 (0 if the model answer is incorrect, 1 if it is correct).
# Output Format
- Provide your final evaluation of whether the answer is correct within `<final_answer>` XML tags.
- Include a detailed analysis for each part within the designated XML tags: `<document_understanding>`, `<chunk_understanding>`, `<question_understanding>`, `<ground_truth_answer_understanding>`, `<model_answer_understanding>`, and `<final_answer>`.
# Examples
**Input**:
```xml
<document_summary>
[Summary]
</document_summary>
<piece_of_text>
[Text]
</piece_of_text>
<question>
[Question]
</question>
<gold_answer>
[Gold Answer]
</gold_answer>
<model_answer>
[Model Answer]
</model_answer>
```
**Output**:
```xml
<document_understanding>
Understanding of the summary including key themes
</document_understanding>
<chunk_understanding>
Analysis of the piece of text
</chunk_understanding>
<question_understanding>
Comprehension of the question being asked
</question_understanding>
<ground_truth_answer_understanding>
Key points from the gold answer
</ground_truth_answer_understanding>
<model_answer_understanding>
Key points and accuracy of Answer A
</model_answer_understanding>
<final_answer>
1 or 0 (1 if the model answer is correct, 0 if it is incorrect)
</final_answer>
```
# Notes
- Always focus on key points and factual correctness as per the ground truth.
- Avoid any biases and rely solely on the evidence presented.
- Enclose all evaluations and analyses in the specified XML tags for clarity and structure."""
JUDGE_ANSWER_USER_PROMPT = """<document_summary>
{summary}
</document_summary>
<piece_of_text>
{chunk}
</piece_of_text>
<question>
{question}
</question>
<gold_answer>
{oracle_answer}
</gold_answer>
<model_answer>
{model_answer}
</model_answer>"""
def get_judge_prompt(question: str, answer: str, gold: str, **kwargs):
chunk = kwargs.get("chunks", "")
summary = kwargs.get("documents", "")
prompt = [
{"role": "system", "content": JUDGE_ANSWER_SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{
"role": "user",
"content": JUDGE_ANSWER_USER_PROMPT.format(
summary=summary, chunk=chunk, question=question, oracle_answer=gold, model_answer=answer
),
},
]
return prompt
def process_judge_response_yourbench(response):
# extract the final answer using regex from the response xml
try:
answer = re.search(r"<final_answer>(.*?)</final_answer>", response, re.DOTALL).group(1)
return int(answer)
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Error processing judge response: {e}")
return 0
class JudgeLLMYourBench(JudgeLLM):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__(
judge_model_name="Qwen/QwQ-32B",
template=get_judge_prompt,
process_judge_response=process_judge_response_yourbench,
judge_backend="inference-providers",
short_judge_name="yourbench_judge",
hf_provider="novita",
max_tokens=2048,
)
def compute(self, sample_ids: list[str], responses: list, formatted_docs: list[Doc]) -> list[dict[str, float]]:
# If we are evaluating a multiturn task, we need to have specific field in the formatted doc
questions = [formatted_doc.specific["question"] for formatted_doc in formatted_docs]
golds = [formatted_doc.get_golds()[0] for formatted_doc in formatted_docs]
predictions = [response[0].result[0] for response in responses]
options = [None] * len(questions)
chunks = [formatted_doc.specific["chunks"][0] for formatted_doc in formatted_docs]
documents = [formatted_doc.specific["document"] for formatted_doc in formatted_docs]
score, _, _ = self.judge.evaluate_answer_batch(
questions, predictions, options, golds, chunks=chunks, documents=documents
)
metrics = []
for i in range(len(sample_ids)):
metrics.append({
"accuracy": score[i],
})
return metrics
ZEROSHOT_QA_USER_PROMPT = """Answer the following question:
<question>
{question}
</question>
Enclose your full answer in <answer> XML tags. For example:
<answer>
[your answer here]
</answer>"""
def yourbench_prompt(line, task_name: str = ""):
return Doc(
task_name=task_name,
query=ZEROSHOT_QA_USER_PROMPT.format(question=line["question"]),
choices=[line["ground_truth_answer"]],
gold_index=0,
specific={
"question_category": line["question_category"],
"kind": line["kind"],
"estimated_difficulty": line["estimated_difficulty"],
"document_id": line["document_id"],
"question_generating_model": line["question_generating_model"],
"chunks": line["chunks"],
"question": line["question"],
"document": line["document"],
},
)
yourbench_metrics = CorpusLevelMetricGrouping(
metric_name=["accuracy"],
higher_is_better={"accuracy": True},
category=MetricCategory.LLM_AS_JUDGE,
use_case=MetricUseCase.ACCURACY,
sample_level_fn=JudgeLLMYourBench().compute,
corpus_level_fn={"accuracy": np.mean},
)
extend_enum(Metrics, "yourbench_metrics", yourbench_metrics)
yourbench = LightevalTaskConfig(
name="HF_TASK_NAME", # noqa: F821
suite=["custom"],
prompt_function=yourbench_prompt,
hf_repo="HF_DATASET_NAME", # noqa: F821
hf_subset="lighteval",
hf_avail_splits=["train"],
evaluation_splits=["train"],
few_shots_split=None,
few_shots_select=None,
generation_size=8192,
metric=[Metrics.yourbench_metrics],
stop_sequence=[],
trust_dataset=True,
version=0,
)
TASKS_TABLE = [yourbench]