Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| ProjID,Year of project,Organization id,Organization type,Role in Organization,Organization Size,IT Department Size,Customer Organization Type,Estimated duration,Actual duration,% project gain (loss),Development Type,Application Domains,Government Policy Impact,Organization Management Structure Clarity,Developer Hiring Policy,Developer Training,Top management opinion of previous system,User computer experience,Project Manager Experience,Consultant Availability,DBMS expert availability,Software Tool Experience,Programmers Experience in Programming Language,Team Selection,Team size,Dedicated team members,Daily working hours,Income Satisfaction,Schedule quality,Methodology,# Multiple programing languages ,Programming language used,DBMS used,Technical stability,Open source software,Level of outsourcing,Outsourcing impact,Degree of software reuse ,Use of standards,Requirement Accuracy Level,Technical Documentation,Comments within the code,User manual,Required reusability,Product complexity,Reliability requirements,Specified H/W | |
| 1,2015,1,University,Developer,>500,31-35,In-house Development,2,3,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,6,6,8,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Agile,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,Missing,No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 2,2016,25,Private Software company,Developer,6-10,1-5,Department in a Private Company,2,3,Missing,Development of new software,Mobile applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,First time on this project,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,2,"Java,Android",MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Simple and clear,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 3,2008,2,Private Software company,Company Manager,6-10,6-10,Bank,3,5,0%,Development of new software,Mobile applications,Very Negative,No organization management structure exists,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",6,6,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,ASP.net,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to redesign the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,User manual does not cover all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Complex,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time but we do not have prior experience with it | |
| 4,2009,42,Public Software company,Project Manager,11-20,6-10,Federal Ministry,6,6,-17%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",6,4,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,C#,ORACLE,one time during project development,No,Outsourcing to an entity with same experience and capabilities as the development team,Schedule Underrun,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 5,2016,42,Public Software company,Project Manager,11-20,6-10,Federal Ministry,12,24,-17%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,9,9,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,3,"Java,C#,PHP",ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Complex,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 6,2012,42,Public Software company,Project Manager,11-20,6-10,Federal Ministry,6,8,0%,Customization of imported software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,No,No Computer experience,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,7,7,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,C#,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Complex,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 7,2016,42,Public Software company,Developer,11-20,1-5,Federal Ministry,6,9,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,5,5,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Java,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,Outsourcing to an entity with same experience and capabilities as the development team,Schedule Underrun,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 8,2018,42,Public Software company,Technical Consultant,11-20,6-10,Federal Ministry,4,4,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,No,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,5,5,10,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,3,"Java,Android,C#",MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,2-3 times,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 9,2018,42,Public Software company,Technical Consultant,11-20,1-5,Federal Ministry,6,6,0%,Development of new software,Mobile applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,4,4,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Android ,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 10,2015,3,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Unit in a Federal Ministry,12,45,0%,Development of new software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations but are not implemented – hiring acquaintances,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,4,3,7,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Hybrid Methodologies,1,C#,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,Missing,All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 11,2001,4,Public Software company,Project Manager,11-20,11-15,Bank,9,36,-25%,Development of new software,Banking systems,Missing,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations but are not implemented – hiring acquaintances,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,7,3,9,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,Outsourcing to an entity with same experience and capabilities as the development team,Schedule Overrun,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time but we do not have prior experience with it | |
| 12,2000,5,Private Software company,Project Manager,6-10,6-10,Department in a Private Company,6,9,0%,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,No Impact,No organization management structure exists,No specific policy followed,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,6 months - 1 year,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,4,4,10,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic 6,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,one time during project development,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 13,2016,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Department in a Federal Ministry,2,4,N/A,Development of new software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on experience in application type,3,2,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 14,2009,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Factory,3,5,N/A,Development of new software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,2-3 years,Based on experience in application type,5,2,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Prototyping,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 15,2010,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Department in a Hospital,3,4,N/A,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,4,2,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Prototyping,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 16,2016,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Nile TV Channel,2.5,5,N/A,Development of new software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,More than 4 years,Based on experience in application type,4,2,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 17,2014,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Factory,2,4,N/A,Upgrading existing software - New technology,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,4,1,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Prototyping,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 18,2012,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Department in a Private Company,1,1.5,N/A,Modifying existing software,Financial and managerial,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,More than 4 years,Based on experience in application type,2,1,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Prototyping,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 19,2014,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Non-profit Organization,4.5,9,N/A,Development of new software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,7,0,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Prototyping,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,Outsourcing to an entity with same experience and capabilities as the development team,Schedule Underrun,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 20,2018,3,Private Software company,Company Manager,1-5,1-5,Private Company,4,7,63%,Development of new software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on experience in application type,2,0,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 21,2015,7,Private Software company,Project Manager,31-40,26-30,Federal Ministry,6,9,-102%,Customization of imported software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,No Computer experience,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,48,48,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Agile,2,Python/Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 22,2000,8,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,6-10,Bank,4,6,0%,Development of new software,Banking systems,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,First time on this project,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,6,6,12,Satisfied,No Schedule,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Visual Basic 6,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 23,2009,9,Federal Ministry,Developer,>500,6-10,In-house Development,3,5,Missing,Development of new software,Web applications,Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 24,2008,8,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,6-10,Bank,4,4,Missing,Development of new software,Banking systems,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,6,6,12,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Visual Basic 6,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 25,2015,10,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,6-10,Private Company,12,25,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,6,2,6,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,No Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Simple and clear,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 26,2011,11,Public Software company,Developer,>500,>50,Missing,1,3,17%,Customization of imported software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,2,1,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,2,Python/Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time but we do not have prior experience with it | |
| 27,2018,3,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Hospital,3,3,25%,Development of new software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations but are not implemented – hiring acquaintances,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,4,1,7,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 28,2017,3,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Private Company,5,5,0%,Modifying existing software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,1-2 years,2-3 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",2,2,5,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 29,2009,3,Private Software company,Developer,1-5,1-5,Private Company,5,24,0%,Upgrading existing software - New technology,ERP,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations but are not implemented – hiring acquaintances,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",2,0,10,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 30,2013,5,Private Software company,Project Manager,6-10,6-10,Department in a Private Company,20,22,20%,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,No Impact,No organization management structure exists,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,First time on this project,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,2,1,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic 6,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Missing,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 31,2006,5,Private Software company,Project Manager,6-10,6-10,Department in a Private Company,3,7,0%,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,No Impact,Organization management structure isn’t clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,No,1-2 years,6 months - 1 year,Based on existing developers,2,1,5,Normal,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic 6,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to redesign the software system",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,User manual does not cover all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 32,2018,5,Private Software company,Project Manager,6-10,6-10,Private Company,7,18,-100%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,1,0,8,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Visual Basic 6,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,2-3 times,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,User manual does not cover all the software system,Will not be reused,Complex,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 33,2016,12,Private Software company,System Administrator,41-50,6-10,Department in a Private Company,7,22,0%,Customization of imported software,ERP,No Impact,Missing,Missing,Missing,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,No,1-2 years,6 months - 1 year,Missing,10,5,8,Missing,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,2,Python/Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,User manual does not cover all the software system,Missing,Missing,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 34,2004,8,Private Software company,Developer,21-30,6-10,Unit in a Federal Ministry,4,12,Missing,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,No Computer experience,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,No,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,8,Very Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,ASP.net,ORACLE,one time during project development,Yes,Outsourcing to an entity with same experience and capabilities as the development team,Schedule Overrun,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Missing,User manual does not cover all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 35,2015,21,Freelancer,Developer,N/A,N/A,Private Company,6,12,N/A,Development of new software,Mobile applications,Negative,No organization management structure exists,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,No Computer experience,No previous experience,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,First time on this project,First time on this project,Based on existing developers,3,3,4,Very Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Android ,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,No Comments,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 36,2019,13,Private Software company,Developer,11-20,1-5,Bank,4,4,Missing,Modifying existing software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,First time on this project,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,2,1,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,No Methodologies,1,Java,MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Use of standards for all the software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Complex,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time but we do not have prior experience with it | |
| 37,2012,11,Public Software company,Developer,>500,>50,Private Company,12,18,-4%,Modifying existing software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",12,12,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,2,Python/Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 38,2018,11,Public Software company,Technical Consultant,>500,>50,Private Company,6,6,4%,Modifying existing software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",9,8,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,2,Python/Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,Outsourcing to an entity with better experience and capabilities than the development team,No affect,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 39,2014,11,Public Software company,Technical Consultant,>500,>50,Private Company,6,12,6%,Development of new software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,1-2 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",10,10,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,2,Python/Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 40,2016,14,Federal Ministry,Project Manager,351-400,1-5,In-house Development,2,24,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,No organization management structure exists,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,8,Normal,No Schedule,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 41,2009,14,Federal Ministry,Project Manager,>500,16-20,In-house Development,12,36,-122%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations but are not implemented – hiring acquaintances,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,2-3 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,5,0,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic 6,ORACLE,Frequent Changes,No,Outsourcing to an entity with better experience and capabilities than the development team,No affect,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Complex,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 42,2001,8,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,1-5,Bank,3,5,Missing,Development of new software,Banking systems,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,6,6,12,Satisfied,No Schedule,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Visual Basic 6,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 43,2017,13,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,1-5,Private Company,6,7,0%,Development of new software,ERP,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,2,0,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Agile,2,Python/Java,MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 44,2015,13,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,1-5,Department in a University,7,7,Missing,Development of new software,Mobile applications,Negative,No organization management structure exists,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,No Computer experience,No previous experience,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,No,First time on this project,First time on this project,Based on existing developers,4,4,5,Missing,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,No Methodologies,1,Java,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to redesign the software system",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 45,2017,15,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,6-10,Private Company,3,6,Missing,Modifying existing software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,No,2-3 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",5,5,5,Normal,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Hybrid Methodologies,1,ASP.net,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 46,2016,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,>500,>50,Private Company,6,12,3%,Development of new software,Web applications,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,5,5,7,Normal,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Java,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,Outsourcing to an entity with same experience and capabilities as the development team,Schedule Overrun,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 47,2018,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,>500,>50,Department in a Federal Ministry,6,11,4%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,No,2-3 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",12,12,7,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Java,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Complex,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time but we do not have prior experience with it | |
| 48,2017,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,>500,>50,Federal Ministry,4,6,6%,Modifying existing software,Financial and managerial,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",6,6,7,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 49,2012,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,>500,>50,Private Company,0.25,0.5,45%,Customization of imported software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,1-2 years,6 months - 1 year,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",6,6,14,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,2,Python/Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase a complete software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 50,2012,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,>500,>50,Department in a University,0.25,0.5,12%,Customization of imported software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,1-2 years,6 months - 1 year,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",6,6,14,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,2,Python/Java,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase a complete software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 51,2016,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,>500,>50,Missing,3,11,9%,Modifying existing software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 52,2016,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,>500,>50,Missing,7,12,-1%,Modifying existing software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,No previous experience,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,4,4,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 53,2012,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,>500,>50,Private Company,1,1.5,41%,Customization of imported software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,1-2 years,6 months - 1 year,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",6,4,14,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase a complete software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 54,2017,13,Private Software company,Developer,11-20,6-10,Private Company,6,18,-21%,Development of new software,ERP,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,3,0,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,Python,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,No user manual available,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Complex,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 55,2014,14,Federal Ministry,Developer,>500,36-40,In-house Development,3,4,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",No previous experience,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,First time on this project,6 months - 1 year,Based on existing developers,2,2,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 56,2005,14,Federal Ministry,Developer,>500,36-40,In-house Development,2,6,-13%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,2-3 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",5,1,8,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 57,2009,5,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,6-10,Department in a Federal Ministry,4,6,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,First time on this project,2-3 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",2,1,8,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic 6,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 58,2015,11,Public Software company,Developer,>500,>50,Missing,8,12,-1%,Modifying existing software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,No,Familiar with Basics,No previous experience,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,4,4,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 59,2017,42,Public Software company,Project Manager,11-20,1-5,Federal Ministry,3,3,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,No,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,4,4,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,C#,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Complex,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 60,2007,5,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,1-5,Department in a Federal Ministry,5,6,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,1,1,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic .Net,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,No Comments,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 61,2010,16,Private Software company,Project Manager,51-100,6-10,Private Company,15,12,0%,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,No Impact,No organization management structure exists,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",4,2,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic .Net,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,one time during project development,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 62,2017,5,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,6-10,Department in a Private Company,2,3,Missing,Development of new software,Mobile applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,More than 4 years,First time on this project,Based on experience in application type,1,1,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,2,CH,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,No Comments,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 63,2013,11,Public Software company,Project Manager,151-200,>50,Federal Ministry,6,8,0%,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Missing,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,12,0,8,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 64,2016,9,Federal Ministry,Project Manager,>500,16-20,In-house Development,5,8,Missing,Development of new software,Web applications,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 65,2011,17,Federal directorates,Project Manager,51-100,11-15,Unit in a Federal Ministry,6,9,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations but are not implemented – hiring acquaintances,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,6 months - 1 year,Based on existing developers,11,11,8,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,C++,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,Outsourcing to an entity with same experience and capabilities as the development team,Schedule Underrun,Reuse/purchase a complete software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 66,2006,18,Private Software company,Project Manager,51-100,6-10,Department in a Federal Ministry,12,18,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,10,4,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Visual Basic 6,MySQL,one time during project development,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 67,2006,18,Private Software company,Project Manager,51-100,6-10,Department in a Federal Ministry,3,6,Missing,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,10,5,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Visual Basic 6,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 68,2014,7,Private Software company,Developer,31-40,26-30,Federal Ministry,10,16,Missing,Upgrading existing software - New technology,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure isn’t clear,No specific policy followed,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,10,10,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 69,2006,18,Private Software company,Project Manager,51-100,6-10,Federal Ministry,3,6,Missing,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations but are not implemented – hiring acquaintances,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,1-2 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,5,2,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic 6,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 70,2018,19,Corporate IT department,Project Manager,151-200,1-5,In-house Development,18,24,Missing,Development of new software,ERP,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Missing,Missing,Yes,Missing,Missing,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",1,1,8,Normal,Missing,Agile,3,Pytho/HTML/PHP,PostgreSQL,Missing,Yes,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing,Missing | |
| 71,2018,42,Public Software company,Project Manager,51-100,1-5,Federal Ministry,6,6,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,PHP,ORACLE,one time during project development,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Complex,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 72,2013,11,Public Software company,Developer,>500,>50,Private Company,1,2,43%,Customization of imported software,ERP,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,1-2 years,6 months - 1 year,Based on existing developers,6,6,14,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase a complete software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 73,2011,11,Public Software company,Developer,101-150,>50,Private Company,3,4,8%,Development of new software,ERP,Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,25,20,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Complex,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Missing | |
| 74,2018,20,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,21-25,Unit in a Federal Ministry,9,15,0%,Development of new software,ERP,Negative,No organization management structure exists,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",18,16,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Python,PostgreSQL,one time during project development,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Detailed comments within code,No user manual available,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 75,2016,12,Private Software company,Developer,11-20,6-10,Public Company,6,16,Missing,Development of new software,ERP,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,12,12,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,2,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 76,2017,22,Private Software company,Project Manager,6-10,1-5,Unit in a Federal Ministry,8,13,N/A,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",8,8,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Java,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 77,2016,22,Private Software company,Project Manager,6-10,1-5,Unit in a Federal Ministry,12,9,9%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,6,6,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Java,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,Missing,Not required | |
| 78,2008,5,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,6-10,Department in a Private Company,2,2.5,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,No organization management structure exists,No specific policy followed,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,No,No Computer experience,Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,2,1,7,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Visual Basic .Net,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,No Comments,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 79,2015,2,Private Software company,Company Manager,11-20,11-15,Department in a Bank,3,5,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",5,5,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Hybrid Methodologies,2,Visual Basic/C#,MySQL,one time during project development,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to redesign the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,"Unclear user manual, written in technical terminology",Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 80,2014,2,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,11-15,Unit in a Federal Ministry,6,12,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,More than 4 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,5,3,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,ASP.net,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase a complete software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to redesign the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,User manual does not cover all the software system,Will not be reused,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 81,2013,44,Freelancer,Developer,N/A,N/A,Department in a University,4,5,0%,Development of new software,Web applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,2,2,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 82,2010,44,Freelancer,Developer,N/A,N/A,Unit in a Federal Ministry,4,4,0%,Development of new software,Web applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,No,First time on this project,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,4,4,8,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 83,2009,23,University,Project Manager,>500,6-10,Department in a University,4,12,0%,Development of new software,Web applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,6 months - 1 year,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,4,2,6,Very Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Other,2,PHP/Oracle,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Detailed comments within code,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 84,2018,23,University,Project Manager,>500,6-10,Department in a University,4,6,50%,Development of new software,Web applications,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,No previous experience,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,3,2,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,PHP,ORACLE,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 85,2004,45,Freelancer,Developer,N/A,N/A,Private Company,4,5,-14%,Upgrading existing software - New technology,Financial and managerial,Negative,No organization management structure exists,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,No previous experience,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,8,0,6,Satisfied,No Schedule,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Simple and clear,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 86,2002,45,Freelancer,Project Manager,N/A,N/A,Department in a Private Company,7,10,0%,Upgrading existing software - New technology,Financial and managerial,Negative,No organization management structure exists,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,No Computer experience,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,1,1,10,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Simple and clear,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 87,2004,3,Private Software company,Project Manager,N/A,N/A,Private Company,12,36,50%,Upgrading existing software - New technology,Bespoke applications,Negative,No organization management structure exists,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",2,2,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,2-3 times,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 88,2007,3,Private Software company,Project Manager,N/A,N/A,Department in a Private Company,2,9,0%,Upgrading existing software - New technology,Financial and managerial,Negative,No organization management structure exists,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,No previous experience,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,1,0,8,Very Satisfied,No Schedule,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time but we do not have prior experience with it | |
| 89,1997,3,Private Software company,Project Manager,N/A,N/A,Department in a Private Company,12,48,-100%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,No organization management structure exists,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",1,1,10,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,Frequent Changes,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 90,2013,24,Federal directorates,Developer,151-200,11-15,In-house Development,6,8,Missing,Development of new software,Web applications,Positive,Organization management structure isn’t clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,5,0,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Javascript/PHP,MySQL,one time during project development,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 91,2016,24,Federal directorates,Developer,151-200,11-15,In-house Development,5,24,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,2,0,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,No Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Complex,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Required specialized H/W that was not available on time | |
| 92,2017,27,Federal directorates,Project Manager,351-400,6-10,In-house Development,3,2,33%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,7,4,8,Very Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments for programmer's convenience,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 93,2017,27,Federal directorates,Project Manager,351-400,6-10,In-house Development,3,6,Missing,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,4,0,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 94,2014,26,Corporate IT department,Developer,151-200,6-10,In-house Development,9,13,Missing,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,2,1,9,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Involves very complex algorithms and difficult to understand,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 95,2016,7,Private Software company,Technical Manager,41-50,41-45,Federal Ministry,4,10,0%,Customization of imported software,ERP,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical and project management issues,Yes,6 months - 1 year,First time on this project,Based on existing developers,45,45,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Python,PostgreSQL,Frequent Changes,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Missing,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 96,2006,31,Private Software company,Developer,6-10,6-10,Department in a Federal Ministry,6,12,0%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",6,1,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,PHP,ORACLE,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,No Comments,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Simple and clear,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 97,2019,32,Private Software company,Developer,6-10,1-5,Private School,1,1,-22%,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",5,3,8,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 98,2019,28,Private Software company,Project Manager,6-10,1-5,Private Company,4,8,Missing,Development of new software,ERP,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,3,2,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Agile,2,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase a complete software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,No Comments,"Unclear user manual, written in technical terminology",Will not be reused,Complex,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 99,2018,33,Corporate IT department,Project Manager,>500,>50,In-house Development,6,5.5,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",3,3,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,3,ASP.net/Javascript/C#,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Use of standards for all the software development lifecycle,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Complex,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 100,2019,29,Private Software company,Company Manager,1-5,1-5,Private Company,3,1,Missing,Development of new software,ERP,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",5,3,8,Very Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Not required | |
| 101,2016,30,Private Software company,Developer,1-5,1-5,Private Company,1,2,Missing,Development of new software,Web applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",No previous experience,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",2,1,8,Normal,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 102,2005,18,Private Software company,Project Manager,51-100,6-10,In-house Development,3,4,Missing,Upgrading existing software - New technology,Financial and managerial,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,3,2,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,one time during project development,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Some complexity with clear aspects,Major monetary losses,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 103,2016,9,Federal directorates,Developer,>500,16-20,In-house Development,6,8,Missing,Development of new software,Web applications,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,5,3,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments for programmer's convenience,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 104,1994,35,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,6-10,Bank,9,15,N/A,Development of new software,Banking systems,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,First time on this project,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,5,5,9,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 105,1993,35,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,6-10,Bank,9,15,N/A,Development of new software,Banking systems,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,First time on this project,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,7,5,9,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 106,2001,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,1-5,1-5,Bank,9,9,N/A,Development of new software,Banking systems,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,9,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 107,2002,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,1-5,Bank,9,9,N/A,Development of new software,Banking systems,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,6,6,9,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 108,1998,35,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,6-10,Bank,12,12,N/A,Development of new software,Banking systems,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,No,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,6,3,9,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 109,2018,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,6-10,1-5,Bank,9,9,N/A,Development of new software,Banking systems,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,6,3,9,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 110,1997,35,Private Software company,Project Manager,21-30,6-10,Bank,12,9,N/A,Development of new software,Banking systems,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,7,5,9,Normal,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 111,2001,6,Private Software company,Project Manager,11-20,1-5,Bank,9,12,N/A,Development of new software,Banking systems,Very Positive,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,No specific policy followed,No training provided,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,6,3,9,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,Minor monetary losses that can be easily mitigated,Not required | |
| 112,2017,33,Corporate IT department,Developer,>500,>50,In-house Development,5,6,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,6,2,8,Satisfied,Devised a schedule with no periodic evaluation,Agile,1,C#,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Some complexity with clear aspects,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Required specialized H/W that was available on time but we do not have prior experience with it | |
| 113,2018,36,Private Software company,Planning Coordinator,41-50,31-35,Bank,7,11,Missing,Development of new software,Banking systems,Negative,Organization management structure isn’t clear,No hiring standards but applicant evaluation is applied,No training provided,No,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,5,4,6,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Java,MySQL,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to redesign the software system",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Detailed comments within code,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Reusing of the complete software system to develop another software system,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 114,2019,37,Private Software company,Project Manager,51-100,6-10,Private Company,3,7,Missing,Customization of imported software,ERP,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",5,0,9,Satisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Agile,1,Python,PostgreSQL,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Use of standards for specific phases in software development lifecycle,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to re-analyze from the beginning",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,User manual does not cover all the software system,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Some complexity with clear aspects,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Not required | |
| 115,2017,39,Telecommunication company,Developer,>500,>50,In-house Development,8,14,Missing,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience but not on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,1-2 years,1-2 years,Based on existing developers,9,4,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Java,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,one time during project development,No,Outsourcing to an entity with same experience and capabilities as the development team,Schedule Overrun,Reuse/purchase from previous software system,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to redesign the software system",Minimal coverage - Large parts of the development lifecycle not covered,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was not available on time | |
| 116,2018,38,University,Project Manager,>500,1-5,In-house Development,2,3,Missing,Customization of imported software,Bespoke applications,No Impact,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,No Computer experience,Previous experience on similar systems,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,No,First time on this project,1-2 years,"Based on job specialization (analysts, designers, ..., etc.)",2,1,8,Very Satisfied,No Schedule,Agile,1,PHP,MySQL,No Technology Change,Yes,Outsourcing to an entity with better experience and capabilities than the development team,No affect,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to reprogram the software system",No documentation - No documentation available,No Comments,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Customizations of the software system to be sold to other customers,Simple and clear,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 117,1998,4,Public Software company,Developer,11-20,11-15,Bank,6,18,0%,Development of new software,Banking systems,Very Negative,Missing,No specific policy followed,Developers were trained specifically for this project,No,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",No previous experience,A consultant advised on the technical issues only,Yes,First time on this project,First time on this project,Based on existing developers,5,4,12,Normal,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,one time during project development,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the technical specifications from previous software system,Not using any standards,Missing,No documentation - No documentation available,No Comments,No user manual available,Will not be reused,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 118,2006,14,Federal Ministry,Project Manager,>500,26-30,In-house Development,2,5,Missing,Development of new software,Financial and managerial,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,Organization provides periodic training which was utilized,Yes,"Previous computer system exists in the customer organization (i.e., users have experience dealing with computers)",Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,2-3 years,2-3 years,Based on existing developers,2,0,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and did not follow it,Waterfall,1,Oracle Developer,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",All phases documented - All stages of the system development documented,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,Clear user manual that covers all the software system,Will not be reused,Simple and clear,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |
| 119,2016,43,Telecommunication company,Developer,>500,>50,In-house Development,3,12,Missing,Upgrading existing software - New technology,Bespoke applications,Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations and are applied,No training provided,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,First time on this project,First time on this project,Based on existing developers,2,1,8,Unsatisfied,Devised a schedule and followed it with periodic evaluation,Hybrid Methodologies,1,PHP,ORACLE,No Technology Change,No,No outsourcing,N/A,Reuse the design of the previous software system,Not using any standards,"Accurate - All requirements specified accurately, and the software was developed accordingly",No documentation - No documentation available,Comments in some modules for other programmers understanding,No user manual available,Reusing of some modules to develop other systems,Simple and clear,"Medium monetary loss, can be mitigated",Required specialized H/W that was available on time and we have prior experience with it | |
| 120,2016,14,Federal Ministry,Technical Consultant,>500,16-20,Federal Ministry,12,36,-150%,Development of new software,Bespoke applications,Very Negative,Organization management structure is clear and all procedures are clear,There exists hiring standards and applicant evaluations but are not implemented – hiring acquaintances,Developers were trained specifically for this project,Yes,Familiar with Basics,Previous experience on similar systems,No consultancy - Consultant not utilized,Yes,More than 4 years,More than 4 years,Based on existing developers,3,3,8,Unsatisfied,No Schedule,Hybrid Methodologies,1,Visual Basic 6,MICROSOFT SQL SERVER,No Technology Change,Yes,No outsourcing,N/A,No Reuse,Not using any standards,"Inaccurate - Requirements not specified accurately, developers had to redesign the software system",Minimal coverage - Only simple parts of the development lifecycle not covered,No Comments,User manual does not cover all the software system,Will not be reused,Some complexity with clear aspects,User inconvenience and dissatisfaction only,Not required | |