Ok let me make that clear if you did not yet understand what is wrong, we are not talking about freedom of usage of general purpose dataset or any other object, it is a dataset made for unethical practice, a knife can be used in kitchen for cutting chicken vegetable etc, a dataset for military usage won't be used in a kitchen!
I will no longer respond ,peace.
hassenhamdi
AI & ML interests
Recent Activity
Organizations
hassenhamdi's activity
@JLouisBiz I have read your comment but it does not make any sense , what is the purpose of regulations and law if there is no limitations to what one can do.
We are not talking about chair here or any ordinary object for innocent usage, we are talking about war tech developement, are a chair and war tools that made primary for destruction and killing the same !!!?
They are not , probably if compared it with a gun it might be more comparable , you can have a gun to protect yourself but you need a permission for possessing a gun as us citizen or you get arrested for possessing unathorized item, you ask why , to unsure public safety, but even with such procedure there still horrifying incident that happens, we are not talking about something similar to chair here, the analogy is poorly representitive of the present situation.
And it is not about opensource and free software it is about not developing war tools.
Take an example someone using their computer for piracy , cyber threats , scams fraudelent activities etcs., do you let them just go their way or some actions need be made to protect people , war tech are far worse than any thing mentioned earlier.
Yesterday a dataset been uploaded on huggingface ,your favorite daily place for AI dataset, model, post ,research, learning about AI etc, for military applications which is against ethics and responsible AI, huggingface policies as stated in their restricted content list:
1. Unlawful or illegal Content
...
Content promoting high-risk illegal activities (weapons development, illegal substances, scams, gambling, pseudo-pharmaceuticals, plagiarism, etc.).
...
3. Harmful or Abusive Content
Terrorist Content or Content that glorifies **violence**, suffering, or humiliation.
...
we may also moderate other types of Content in response to evolving challenges posed by advancements in Machine Learning.
I urge community to report any content against ethical use of tech stack including AI , keeping huggingface good place for AI and data enthusiasts.
Here the link to the dataset: ZennyKenny/tactical-military-reasoning-v.1.0
Take action report it, let the platform stay an enjoyable place for whatever you are using it for AI , Data etc.
How shameful.
It will be nice addition to make paper that include benchmarking against different task and models.
It is about morality , what you made could be not of a big significance for military research and applications but may Allah forbid noramlize the idea of use AI and IT or any other thing in general to things such deceptive content , military and etc.
Such things are likely to be misused so such things should not be passed as 'OK' but be opposed to collectively.
I am reporting this.
We are not in need for applying AI to military to be used for war to kill civilians (women ,children )and innocents people.
Are you aware of what's going on in Palestine due to misuse of AI to target civilans ???
"The conversion process is designed to be simple and efficient and requires only an input model (in HF format) and a target bitrate. By computing Hessians on the fly and thanks to a fused Viterbi kernel, the quantizer can convert a model in a single step, taking a couple of minutes for smaller models, up to a few hours for larger ones (70B+) (on a single RTX 4090 or equivalent GPU.)"
Repo: https://github.com/turboderp-org/exllamav3
it will be great addition if it does maybe with an editor like reddit ๐ค post .
fix the link to github it has ')**' at the end.
Also it appears that huggingface posts don't handle markdowns.
MohamedRashad/Quran-Recitations
Check it out ๐ฅท
Researchers from University of Science and Technology of China and Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence have developed a novel retrieval model that mimics the slow-thinking capabilities of reasoning-focused LLMs like OpenAI's O1 and DeepSeek's R1.
Unlike traditional embedding models that directly match queries with documents, O1 Embedder first generates thoughtful reflections about the query before performing retrieval. This two-step process significantly improves performance on complex retrieval tasks, especially those requiring intensive reasoning or zero-shot generalization to new domains.
The technical implementation is fascinating:
- The model integrates two essential functions: Thinking and Embedding
- It uses an "Exploration-Refinement" data synthesis workflow where initial thoughts are generated by an LLM and refined by a retrieval committee
- A multi-task training method fine-tunes a pre-trained LLM to generate retrieval thoughts via behavior cloning while simultaneously learning embedding capabilities through contrastive learning
- Memory-efficient joint training enables both tasks to share encoding results, dramatically increasing batch size
The results are impressive - O1 Embedder outperforms existing methods across 12 datasets in both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios. For example, it achieves a 3.9% improvement on Natural Questions and a 3.0% boost on HotPotQA compared to models without thinking capabilities.
This approach represents a significant paradigm shift in retrieval technology, bridging the gap between traditional dense retrieval and the reasoning capabilities of large language models.
What do you think about this approach? Could "thinking before retrieval" transform how we build search systems?
Would like to see performance on well known benchmark datasets.
Weโre excited to unveil **Graph-Enhanced Singular Adaptive Learning (GESAL)**, a framework that lets LLMs like
meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B
adapt in real time using user feedback. Check out the code and white paper on GitHub!๐ **Code**: [https://github.com/writer/AI-Adaptive-Learning-GESAL](https://github.com/writer/AI-Adaptive-Learning-GESAL)
---
## Why GESAL?
Static LLMs struggle to adapt without heavy retraining. GESAL solves this with:
- **SVF**: Adapts weights via \( W' = U (\Sigma \cdot z) V^T \), using few parameters.
- **Graph Memory**: Stores adaptations in nodes for scalability.
- **RL**: Updates via \( J(z) = \mathbb{E}[\log \pi_z(y|x) r] \) based on feedback.
---
## How It Works
Ask "How many Rโs in โstrawberryโ?" If it says "2" and you say "no," GESAL learns to say "3" next time, avoiding repeats.
---
## Try It
Built with Hugging Faceโs
transformers
:pip install transformers torch numpy
python Adaptive_Learning_(GESAL).py
Needs a Hugging Face token for Llama-3.2-1B.
---
## Results
GESAL hits 95% accuracy after 5 feedbacks vs. LoRAโs 70%. Itโs efficient (~0.5M params) and scalable.
That's where FastRTC comes in! It makes WebRTC and Websocket streams super easy with minimal code and overhead.
Check out our org: hf.co/fastrtc
We have Navid-AI/The-Arabic-Rag-Leaderboard,
an Update for OALL/Open-Arabic-LLM-Leaderboard
and the release of atlasia/darija-chatbot-arena
All of this announcements was under 12 hours of time ๐คฏ
I like the website UI , looks neat. experience might become better if removing the loading , and the example link to example instead of 404 error page. Overall , I hope that people use your project reasonably. @Abhaykoul
AI and emotion , honestly I genuinely can't comprehend that, the world contains 8B human being (some of them are demons in the flesh of humans), and seeking to make machine more emotional, whereas in the real world people tend to act like machines, I think there real need for people is to be connected to Allah (God) then they won't have any emptiness nor the need for any other emotional support, faith (is both emotional and rational) is a primary instinctive need for human being, I think people should stem the grain of faith in their heart to find the pleasure of it and the true meaning of love. Genuinely I advice people to know who is Allah and what does it mean to believe.
Sorry the audio quality sucks, I will buy a new microphone today. Why does some moron like me solve these things and not you? I know more about how computers work than you do, that's it. Swarm algorithms were big in the 90's and early 2000's. Computers were absolute dog doo doo then in one specific way, compared to now. That one way, which everyone overlooks, is the entire secret behind why swarm algorithms are so good.