Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -17,21 +17,18 @@ The goal of the DocuMint model is to generate docstrings that are concise (brief
|
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-
- **Developed by:**
|
21 |
-
- **
|
22 |
-
- **
|
23 |
-
- **
|
24 |
-
- **
|
25 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
26 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
27 |
|
28 |
### Model Sources [optional]
|
29 |
|
30 |
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
31 |
|
32 |
-
- **Repository:**
|
33 |
-
- **Paper [optional]:**
|
34 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
35 |
|
36 |
## Uses
|
37 |
|
@@ -39,66 +36,24 @@ The goal of the DocuMint model is to generate docstrings that are concise (brief
|
|
39 |
|
40 |
### Direct Use
|
41 |
|
42 |
-
|
43 |
|
44 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
45 |
-
|
46 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
47 |
-
|
48 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
49 |
-
|
50 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
51 |
-
|
52 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
53 |
-
|
54 |
-
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
55 |
-
|
56 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
57 |
-
|
58 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
59 |
-
|
60 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
61 |
-
|
62 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
63 |
-
|
64 |
-
### Recommendations
|
65 |
-
|
66 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
67 |
-
|
68 |
-
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
69 |
-
|
70 |
-
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
71 |
-
|
72 |
-
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
73 |
-
|
74 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
75 |
|
76 |
## Training Details
|
77 |
|
78 |
### Training Data
|
79 |
|
80 |
-
|
81 |
-
|
82 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
83 |
-
|
84 |
-
### Training Procedure
|
85 |
-
|
86 |
-
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
87 |
-
|
88 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
89 |
-
|
90 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
91 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
93 |
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
94 |
|
95 |
-
-
|
96 |
|
97 |
-
|
98 |
|
99 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
100 |
|
101 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
102 |
|
103 |
## Evaluation
|
104 |
|
@@ -106,67 +61,19 @@ Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
|
106 |
|
107 |
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
108 |
|
109 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
110 |
-
|
111 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
112 |
-
|
113 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
114 |
-
|
115 |
-
#### Factors
|
116 |
-
|
117 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
118 |
-
|
119 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
120 |
-
|
121 |
#### Metrics
|
122 |
|
123 |
-
|
124 |
|
125 |
-
|
126 |
-
|
127 |
-
### Results
|
128 |
-
|
129 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
130 |
-
|
131 |
-
#### Summary
|
132 |
-
|
133 |
-
|
134 |
-
|
135 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
136 |
-
|
137 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
138 |
|
139 |
-
|
140 |
-
|
141 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
142 |
-
|
143 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
144 |
-
|
145 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
146 |
-
|
147 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
148 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
149 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
150 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
151 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
152 |
-
|
153 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
154 |
-
|
155 |
-
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
156 |
-
|
157 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
158 |
|
159 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
160 |
-
|
161 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
162 |
|
163 |
#### Hardware
|
164 |
|
165 |
-
|
166 |
|
167 |
-
#### Software
|
168 |
-
|
169 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
170 |
|
171 |
## Citation [optional]
|
172 |
|
@@ -174,29 +81,19 @@ Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator]
|
|
174 |
|
175 |
**BibTeX:**
|
176 |
|
177 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
179 |
-
**APA:**
|
180 |
-
|
181 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
182 |
-
|
183 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
184 |
-
|
185 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
|
186 |
-
|
187 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
188 |
-
|
189 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
190 |
-
|
191 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
192 |
-
|
193 |
-
## Model Card Authors [optional]
|
194 |
|
195 |
[More Information Needed]
|
196 |
|
197 |
## Model Card Contact
|
198 |
|
199 |
-
|
200 |
-
|
201 |
|
202 |
- PEFT 0.8.2
|
|
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
+
- **Developed by:** Bibek Poudel, Adam Cook, Sekou Traore, Shelah Ameli (University of Tennessee, Knoxville)
|
21 |
+
- **Model type:** Causal language model fine-tuned for code documentation generation
|
22 |
+
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English, Python
|
23 |
+
- **License:** MIT
|
24 |
+
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** google/codegemma-2b
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
26 |
### Model Sources [optional]
|
27 |
|
28 |
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
29 |
|
30 |
+
- **Repository:** TODO
|
31 |
+
- **Paper [optional]:** TODO
|
|
|
32 |
|
33 |
## Uses
|
34 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
37 |
### Direct Use
|
38 |
|
39 |
+
The DocuMint model can be used directly to generate high-quality docstrings for Python functions. Given a Python function definition, the model will output a docstring in the format """<generated docstring>""".
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
42 |
## Training Details
|
43 |
|
44 |
### Training Data
|
45 |
|
46 |
+
The training data consists of 100,000 Python functions and their docstrings extracted from popular open-source repositories in the FLOSS ecosystem. Repositories were filtered based on metrics such as number of contributors (> 50), commits (> 5k), stars (> 35k), and forks (> 10k) to focus on well-established and actively maintained projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
48 |
+
An abstract syntax tree (AST) based parser was used to extract functions and docstrings. Challenges in the data sampling process included syntactic errors, multi-language repositories, computational expense, repository size discrepancies, and ensuring diversity while avoiding repetition.
|
49 |
|
50 |
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
51 |
|
52 |
+
The model was fine-tuned using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for 4 epochs with a batch size of 8 and gradient accumulation steps of 16. The initial learning rate was 2e-4. In total, there were 78,446,592 LoRA parameters and 185,040,896 training tokens. The full hyperparameter configuration is provided in Table 2 of the paper.
|
53 |
|
54 |
+
Fine-tuning was performed using an Intel 12900K CPU, an Nvidia RTX-3090 GPU, and 64 GB RAM. Total fine-tuning time was 48 GPU hours.
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
58 |
## Evaluation
|
59 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
62 |
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
#### Metrics
|
65 |
|
66 |
+
- **Accuracy:** Measures the coverage of the generated docstring on code elements like input/output variables. Calculated using cosine similarity between the generated and expert docstring embeddings.
|
67 |
|
68 |
+
- **Conciseness:** Measures the ability to convey information succinctly without verbosity. Calculated as a compression ratio between the compressed and original docstring sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
70 |
+
- **Clarity:** Measures readability using simple, unambiguous language. Calculated using the Flesch-Kincaid readability score.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
73 |
#### Hardware
|
74 |
|
75 |
+
Single GPU RTX-3090
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
78 |
## Citation [optional]
|
79 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
82 |
**BibTeX:**
|
83 |
|
84 |
+
(TODO)
|
85 |
+
@misc{poudel2024documint,
|
86 |
+
title={DocuMint: Docstring Generation for Python using Small Language Models},
|
87 |
+
author={Bibek Poudel* and Adam Cook* and Sekou Traore* and Shelah Ameli*},
|
88 |
+
year={2024},
|
89 |
+
}
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
92 |
[More Information Needed]
|
93 |
|
94 |
## Model Card Contact
|
95 |
|
96 |
+
- For questions or more information, please contact:
|
97 |
+
{bpoudel3,acook46,staore1,oameli}@vols.utk.edu
|
98 |
|
99 |
- PEFT 0.8.2
|