tokens: Therefore , the applicant has no legal interest in raising that line of argument ( see , to that effect , judgment of 28 February 2017 , JingAo Solar and Others v Council , T ‑ 157 / 14 , not published , EU : T : 2017 : 127 , paragraphs 64 to 72 ) . 36 In the second place , with regard to the arguments alleging infringement of Article 11 ( 5 ) and Article 17 ( 3 ) of the basic regulation ( see paragraphs 16 and 17 above ) , firstly , it must be borne in mind that , in interpreting a provision of EU law , it is necessary to consider not only its wording , but also the context in which it occurs and the objectives pursued by the legislation of which it is part ( see judgment of 18 September 2014 , Valimar , C ‑ 374 / 12 , EU : C : 2014 : 2231 , paragraph 42 and the case-law cited ) . 37 Secondly , it follows from Article 11 ( 5 ) of the basic regulation that ‘ the relevant provisions of this Regulation with regard to procedures and the conduct of investigations , excluding those relating to time-limits , shall apply to any review carried out pursuant to paragraphs 2 , 3 and 4 ’ .