tokens: It is by reference to that case-law that the General Court held , in the context of the application of Article 11 ( 3 ) of Council Regulation ( EC ) No 384 / 96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community ( OJ 1996 L 56 , p . 1 ) ( subsequently Article 11 ( 3 ) of the basic regulation ) , that the purpose of the review procedure was therefore to adapt the duties imposed to take account of an evolution in the factors which gave rise to them and the procedure therefore presupposed that those factors had altered ( judgment of 29 June 2000 , Medici Grimm v Council , T ‑ 7 / 99 , EU : T : 2000 : 175 , paragraph 82 ) . 27 It follows that a request for an interim review , provided for under Article 11 ( 3 ) of the basic regulation , that is limited to dumping aspects and lodged by an exporting producer must include evidence offered in support that the factors that formed the basis for setting the dumping margin used to establish the anti-dumping duty applicable to the exporting producer who lodged the request have changed in a significant and lasting manner . 28 In the present case , as the applicant did not take part in the investigation that led to the adoption of the definitive regulation , the applicant is to be considered , pursuant to both Article 18 ( 1 ) of the basic regulation ( now Article 18 ( 1 ) of Regulation 2016 / 1036 ) and paragraph 6 of the notice of the opening of the initial proceeding ( OJ 2010 C 160 , p . 20 ) , to have failed to cooperate with the investigation .