tokens: The applicant ’ s request for an interim review should , it argues , be considered to be a voluntary response within the meaning of that provision . 19 In the sixth place , the applicant claims , in its reply , that , following its request and demonstration of individual and specific changed circumstances , the Commission ought at least to treat it as a now cooperating exporter and , in accordance with Article 9 ( 6 ) of the basic regulation , apply the rate of anti-dumping duty based on the weighted average margin of dumping established for the exporting producers included in the sample . 20 In the seventh place , the applicant claims that it has already put forward its arguments regarding Article 17 ( 3 ) of the basic regulation in its reply to the general disclosure document , but that the Commission failed to respond to those arguments in the contested decision , thereby infringing the applicant ’ s right to a fair hearing and its rights of defence .